HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/25/2005
,.J II _ I _ _ )
~{)/M~
6:30 p.m. Pre-Meeting
~\~:I\J~~\
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
July 25, 2005
7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF July 11. 2005
PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES
15 Minute Recess for Dessert Reception
Business Awards
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
1 Citizens, who wish, may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of
3 Minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster.
2 Citizens who wish to speak on Agenda Items, please sign the GENERAL
AGENDA ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is
called to be heard
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Item 1.
Consent Agenda:
A. Award ITB-05-023 Kipling Street Pedestrian Project in an amount not
to exceed $179,737 03
B Approval of participation in the XCEL Energy Quality of Services Plan
proceedings at the Public Utilities Commission
C RESOLUTION 38-2005 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2005 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET TO
REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,98170. ALONG WITH
AWARDING ITB-05-17 ESTES-CARR MAJOR STRE:.ET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PHASE II, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $765,981 70
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. July 11, 2005
Page -2-
D RESOLUTION 39-2005 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2005 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT
OF $21,000 TOWARDS THE PURCHASE OF FOUR POLICE
VEHICLES, ALONG WITH APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF FOUR
FULLY EQUIPPED POLICE VEHICLES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $129,000.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
Item 2.
Item 3.
COUNCIL BILL 11-2005 - AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM A-1 , AGRICULTURE-ONE
AND C-1, COMMERCIAL-ONE TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990
PARFET STREET
(Case No WZ-05-05) (Michael G Pharo Associates for Bear Land
(Holdings)
Public Meeting on 2006 Budget.
DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS
Item 4.
Item 5.
RESOLUTION 36-2005 - A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY REPORT,
REPOSITIONING WHEAT RIDGE, AND ADOPTING ITS FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AS GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR REVITALIZING
THE CITY
RESOLUTION 37-2005 - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
FORMATION OF WHEAT RIDGE 2020, A NON-PROFIT
CORPORATION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSISTING THE CITY IN
BRINGING ABOUT COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION AND AMENDING
THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE
APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE
AMOUNT OF $415,000 TO BEGIN BUILDING THE RECOMMENDED
ORGANIZATION, WR2020, WHICH IN TURN WILL SET DIRECTION
FOR, AND IMPLEMENT THE NINE STRATEGIES CONTAINED WITHIN
THE NRS REPOSITIONING WHEAT RIDGE REPORT
CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS
CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS
ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS
ADJOURNMENT
@~w @@(!D~@~[S ~~~QDlf~~
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
JulV 11. 2005
Mayor Cerveny called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7 00 P m Councilmembers
present: Karen Adams, Karen Berry, Jerry DiTullio, Dean Gokey, Lena Rotola, Wanda Sang,
Larry Schulz, and Mike Stites Also present: City Clerk, Pamela Anderson, City Manager,
Randy Young, Deputy City Manager Patrick Goff; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl, Director of
Community Development, Alan White, staff; and interested citizens
APPROV AL OF MINUTES OF June 27. 2005
Motion by Mr DiTullio for the approval of the Minutes of June 27,2005, seconded by Mrs
Sang, carried 8-0
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
No one was present to speak.
Item 1.
Consent Aqenda:
A. RESOLUTION 33-2005 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) BETWEEN THE
JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
ENVIRONMENT AND THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR
COOPERATIVE MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN THE
AMOUNT OF $5,913 00
B RESOLUTION 34-2005 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FIRST
AMENDMENT TO ANNEXATION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT AMONG THE CITY, CABELA'S RETAIL, INC, AND
THE COORS BREWING COMPANY
C RESOLUTION 35-2005 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2005 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET TO
REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $127,700 TO EXPAND THE
SCOPE OF THE POLICE EVIDENCE COMPOUND PROJECT
D APPROVE PURCHASE OF PARKS AND RECREATION MINIBUS IN
THE AMOUNT OF $53,755 00
Consent Agenda was introduced and read by Mrs Adams
Motion by Mrs Adams for approval of the Consent Agenda, seconded by Mr Gokey;
carri"d 8-0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 11, 2005
Page -2-
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
Item 2.
COUNCIL BILL 12-2005 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 26-
204 AND SECTION 26-501 C 4. OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF
LAWS CONCERNING THE LOCATION OF PARKING FACILITIES
Mayor Cerveny opened the public hearing
Council Bill 12-2005 was introduced on second reading by Mr Gokey City Clerk
Pamela Anderson assigned Ordinance No 1348 and read the executive summary
Alan White, Director of Community Development, made the staff presentation He noted
that this is a public hearing and all required notifications were made
Mayor closed the public hearing
Motion by Mr Gokey to approve Council Bill 12-2005 (Ordinance No 1348) on second
reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by Mrs Rotola,
carried 8-0
ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS
At Mr DiTullio's request, City Attorney Jerry Dahl explained the difference between a public
meeting and a social gathering
Meeting adjourned at 7.28 p m
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON July 25, 2005 BY A VOTE OF _ to _
Lena Rotola, Council President
The preceding Minutes were prepared according to ~47 of Robert's Rules of Order, i e
they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the
members Tape recordings and video recordings of the meetings are available for
listening or viewing in the City Clerk's Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and
Resolutions
City of Wheat Ridge
Office of Economic Development
Memorandum
.---'1
Etg.~opt!,~pment
{Wheat 'Riage, Co[oraao
TO'
Mayor and City Council
FROM.
0/
Barbara Delgadillo, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE:
July 21, 2005
SUBJECT:
Business Award Presentations
The business awards are scheduled to be presented during your Monday night meeting. A power point
presentation and script have been prepared to add significance to the program as well as provide you with the key
elements for each of the recipients.
The Mayor will begin the presentation with opening remarks and will introduce the presenter of the first award.
Each presenter will then explain the award, and announce this year's recipient and give very brief overview of the
company.
The order of events for the evening is as follows:
Recipient
Cultural Commission Award
Recipient Comments and Photo
Presenter
Commission Representative (to be determined)
Reinvestment A ward
Recipient Comments and Photo
Mike Stites/Karen Adams
Small Business of the Year Award
Recipient Comments and Photo
Dean Gokey/Karen Berry
Business of the Year Award
Recipient Comments and Photo
Jerry DiTullio!Wanda Sang
Community Partnership A ward
Recipient Comments and Photo
Lena Rotola/Larry Schulz
Group Photo of all recipients and Mayor/City Council
Mayor to Recess to small Reception in Lobby
Attached is the draft script for the evening. Each pair of presenters will need to determine who will read the script
and introduce the company I will be coordinating the power point presentation that will coincide with your
presentations.
Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. I may be reached at 303-235-2806
Business A wards Presentation
Thank you for joining us for the presentation of the 3rd Annual Wheat Ridge
Business Awards, given by the City of Wheat Ridge and the Office of Economic
Development.
It's a pleasure to honor these very special businesses who have helped to
make Wheat Ridge a great place to live and work.
Nominations for the awards were submitted by local businesses and the
winners were determined by a selection committee composed oflast year's award
recipients, and one member from business communities that included the West
Chamber, Enterprise Wheat Ridge, Applewood Business Association and the
Wheat Ridge Business Association.
All the nominees will be honored at our second annual business appreciation
lunch on August 5 from 11 :30 to 1 at the Recreation Center.
We have five awards we would like to present, and we will begin with the
Cultural Commission award. Here to present that award is ?????
c
-)
(Cultural Commission)
Speaker:
The Cultural Commission Award is new this year and is a special tribute that
recognizes a business which has made an impact on our community through one or
more ofthe following areas:
Promoting culture and the arts,
Encouraging the appreciation of culture and art,
Promoting awareness of our cultural activities, diversity and heritage,
Promoting a creative environment,
Supporting opportunities in art education for all ages and incorporating art
into the architecture and design oftheir building.
We are very proud to announce present this year's award to Noodles and
Company at 3294 Y oungfield. The general manager is Cathy Coulter.
Noodles and Company has 19 employees and has actively supported and
promoted a number of cultural events, include the Performance in the Park Annual
Series at Anderson Park.
Here to accept the award is:
(c ,~, C ~~~ "v (
) .
Mike Stites and Karen Adams will now present the next award.
(Mike Stites and Karen Adams)
Speaker
Our next award is the Re-investment Award. This award recognizes a business
that has demonstrated one or more of the following:
Made a significant investment in property
Improved the overall appearance of the site
Helps upgrade the overall image of Wheat Ridge
Maintained property at the highest standards
This year we present the award to a long time business in the Wheat Ridge
area, J & B Tax Accountants, Inc, 8151 W. 44th Avenue.
J & B is a family run business, having been founded in 1977 by Verlyn
"Whitey" Johnson in a building at the current location. His son's Dan and J.D.
Johnson still operate at that address, but the property has undergone a major
facelift that reflects the history of the company while looking toward the future.
When the building was damaged by fire, Dan and J.D. worked with the city
of Wheat Ridge to come up with a new building that enhances the neighborhood
while blending into the residential setting at its property borders. The Johnson's
see the re-vitalization of the office building as their commitment to forge a better
and more inviting community. They have been in the new facility since 2000.
Here to accept the award are Don and J.D. Johnson. Congratulations.
(Pause for comments from the recipient, photo o~! T'J'
Dean Gokey and Karen Berry will now present our next award.
(Dean Gokey and Karen Berry)
Our next presentation is for the Small Business of the Year Award. This award
recognizes a business that has demonstrated one or more of the following:
Has 15 or less employees
Has shown a successful history and is positioned for growth
Offers unusual opportunities
Has participated in various community and city efforts and events
This year, the award goes to another long time Wheat Ridge company ~- Drum
City-Guitarland, Inc on W. 44th Avenue. It has been in the same location for 40
years. It was founded by brothers, Jason and Tim Kae, and it has 5 employees.
While it might be a small company, Drum City-Guitarland has a big customer
base. Orders come in from around the world. The company conducts a lot of
business through its website and has built a well-respected reputation in the music
industry.
Here to accept the award are Tim and Jason Kae. Congratulations.
(Pause for comments from the recipient, photo op)
Jerry DiTullio and Wanda Sang will now present our next award.
Jerry DiTullio and Wanda Sang
Our next award goes to the Business of the Year. This award recognizes a
business that has demonstrated one or more of the following:
? Demonstrated growth in employment numbers
? Demonstrated growth in retail sales or overall production
? Has made significant capital investment in its operations
? Has participated in various community and city efforts and
events
This year's award is presented to PG Construction Services, rnc at 7114 W. 44th
Ave. Pam Goff is the General Manager.
PG Construction is a full service general contracting firm that was founded in 1995
and specializes in remodeling and rehabilitative construction. The number of
employees fluctuates according to the seasons and the number of working
contracts. The company is working hard at establishing long lasting professional
and personal relationships. Their goal is competitive pricing, quality service and
good customer relationships. They are looking toward growing in Wheat Ridge as
part of Enterprise Wheat Ridge, a business association dedicated to helping
businesses grow. Being sure that Wheat Ridge could become more attractive and
sustaining, Pam, along with a handful of other business leaders, created and
developed the Enterprise Wheat Ridge business association. She has served as its
President for three years and has dedicated herself unselfishly to promoting and
encouraging business interaction, community service activities and supporting new
and existing businesses.
Here tonight to accept the award are Pam and David Goff. Congratulations.
.--
(Pause for comments from the recipient, photo op)
Lena Rotola and Larry Schulz will now present our next award.
(Lena Rotola and Larry Schulz)
Our most prestigious award of the evening is the City Council Community
Partnership Award. This award gives the City Council an opportunity to
recognize a company for their overall contributions to the City of Wheat Ridge. It
incorporates criteria from all award categories as well as contributions in
volunteerism, leadership, and community investment/involvement.
This year's winner is ADP/SIS at 4720 and 4725 Independence Street. ADP/SIS
is a division of the Brokerage Services Group of Automatic Data Processing. It's a
leading provider of securities and information processing software solutions.
It has been at its current address in Wheat Ridge since 1987 and employs 150
people. Dave Holland is Director of Configuration Management and Dave
Swift is the Senior Vice President and General Manager. ADP/SIS has
demonstrated its commitment to Wheat Ridge by expanding its facilities here in
our city after researching other potential locations. It built a new structure at 4720
Independence, which was completed in 2002.
The company is working to make a positive impression on the community with its
buildings and well-maintained grounds and wants to be a positive influence on
neighboring businesses and residences.
The Company works at giving back to the community in a number of ways. In
2001 the company began a reading program with the neighborhood school,
Pennington Elementary. ADP/SIS employees visit classrooms twice a week during
lunch hours to volunteer with reading, writing or math tutorial sessions in grade K
through 6. Up to now employees have contributed more than 18-hundred hours of
time to this effort.
The company also sponsored an essay contest at the school for 3 years and gave
gift certificates from Walden Books to the winners.
ADP/SIS was the main sponsor for a city-wide essay contest for 6th graders in 2004
and has donated retired PCs from the company, office supplies and books to
schools for students who have no access to computers.
The company also actively participates in the United Way Campaign each year,
and employees give blood as part of the Bonfils blood drive.
The company has served as a major sponsor of the Bright Beginnings Golf
Tournament and also takes part in the Starlight Children's Foundation, Jeffco
Action Center Food drive, the Marine Corp Toys for Tots Program and Bike to
Work Day.
The company believes that by taking part in these events, it is not only giving back
to the community, but it improves the morale for employees, who enjoy taking
part.
For all these efforts, we salute ADP/SIS by giving the company the City Council's
Community Partnership Award.
Here to accept the award are David Swift, Senior Vice President and General
Manager and David Holland, Director of Configuration Management.
'" ------
Pause for recipient comments and photo op.
Pause for group photo of all recipients and Mayor/Council Members.
(Mayor)
On behalf of the City of Wheat Ridge, I want to congratulate all of this year's
award recipients and thank everyone who participated through nominating a
business and selecting the recipients.
Many nominations were received making it difficult to select just one recipient. It
is Council's intent to honor all of the business nominees and recipients during our
annual Business Appreciation Luncheon on Friday, August 5 at the Recreation
Center.
I encourage all of you to RSVP for this event if you haven't already done so. It is
the one time the City can say "thank you" to all of you. If you need information,
call Barbara Delgadillo of our City Manager'slEconomic Development office at
303-235-2806.
Recess for reception to honor the recipients.
ITEM NO' I. A I
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
I /'
I'r$~'
Ifni
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
July 25, 2005
TITLE:
AWARD ITB-05-023 KIPLING STREET PEDESTRIAN PROJECT
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $179,737.03
o PUBLIC HEARING
[8J BIDS/MOTIONS
o RESOLUTIONS
o ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date'_)
o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
Quasi-Judicial 0
d~
[8J
o
CIt~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The KIpling Street Pedestrian Project will construct a much needed sidewalk facility along the south
side ofI-70 South Frontage Road from Kiplmg Street approxImately 600 feet west. An alternative bid
Item was mcIuded to construct sIdewalks adjacent to the Ramada Inn motel at the southeast comer of
KIpling Street and South 1-70 Frontage Road. ThIs project was planned in conjunction WIth an Xcel
Energy powerhne undergrounding project, which has been completed. The project is phase two of a
multI-phase pedestrian enhancement program for the area. The scope of the pedestrian program also
includes mstallation of pedestrian hghting along the frontage road, WhICh has been completed by Excel
Energy. On July 11,2005, three (3) bids were received. The apparent low bidder was Concrete
Construction Specialhes, LLC, Castle Rock, Colorado in the amount 01'$163,397.30 for the base bid
and Alternate A. Their initial bid dId not acknowledge Addendum 2, which was a deduct. The two
other bIds received were over budget. Staff worked WIth Concrete Construction SpecIalhes, LLC
which resulted m a lower price for the project. References and experience were evaluated by the
Public Works Department. Staff recommends award of the project to the lowest responSIVe and
responsible bidder, Concrete Construction SpeCIalties, LLC m the bId amount 01'$163,397.30.
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
BIds for the Kiphng Street Pedestrian Project, #S-01-05, were opened on Tuesday, July 12,2005
Three (3) bIds were received. The bIds were compnsed of two parts, base bid and alternate bId A.
The base bId proVIded for construction of sidewalk on the south side ofI-70 Frontage Road from
Klplmg to about 600 feet west. Alternate A will provide for construction of sidewalk at the southeast
comer of the Kiplmg and 1-70 South Frontage intersection. The base bids ranged from $89,093.80 to
$155,043.00 and bids for alternative A ranged from $74,303.50 to $95,23785 The Engineer's
Estimate for the base bid and alternate bid A were $93,148 15 and $67,954.30 respectively. Staff
recommends awarding both base bid and alternate A. The lowest responsible and responsive bidder,
Concrete Construction Specialttes, LLC Castle Rock, Colorado has met the bid and qualification
requirements. Based upon the contractor's demonstrated capabilities and experience, Staff
recommends award to Concrete Construction SpeCialties, LLC
A 10% contingency amount of $16,339 73 IS requested to allow the cost of other Items related to the
proj ect.
AL TERNA TIVES CONSIDERED:
No award and Kipling Street Pedestnan Project will not be accomphshed.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Fundmg for this program has been approved m the 2005 Capital Improvement Program budget as the
Kiplmg Pedestrian Improvement Projects line item in the amount of $200,000 00 $28,466.39 was
previously authorized from this account to pay for the pedestrian light installation and a fire hydrant
relocation. Staff recommends that $8,20342 be transferred from Minor Street Improvement Project
Account 30-303-800-840 to Kipling Pedestnan Improvements Account 30-303-800-842 to allow a
standard 10 percent project contmgency
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to award ITB-05-023, Kipling Street Pedestrian Project, #S-O 1-05 to Concrete Construction
Speclalttes, LLC, Castle Rock, Colorado in the bid amount of$163,397.30
I further move that a contingency amount of $16,339 73 be approved.
I further move that the Director of Pubhc Works be authorized to issue change orders up to a total
contract and contingency amount of$179,737.03
I further move that $8,203.42 be transferred from account 30-303-800-840 to the Kipling Pedestrian
Improvement Project account 30-303-800-842 to increase the project contingency to a standard 10
percent.
I further move that all costs associated with this contract be paid from account number 30-303-800-
842, and that these funds be encumbered for the length of the project in accordance With Ordinance
#787, 1989 Series."
or,
"I move to deny award of ITB-05-023 Kiplmg Street Pedestnan Project for the following reason(s)
Report Prepared by'
Reviewed by'
Tim Paranto, Duector of Public Works
Lmda Tnmble, Purchasmg Agent
Attachments:
1. 2005 Capital Improvement Program Descnption
2. Project LocatIOn Map
3 BId Tab Sheet
050725 Request for City Council Action Kipling Ped Phase II
Capital Inl'estment Program
3.
Hotel/Motel District Pedestrian Improvements
2005 Budget: $200,000
Description: A portlOn ofthe east sIde of KIpling Street south ofI-70 and the South 1-70
Frontage Road will be Improved by installation of sidewalks and pedestnan hghtmg. ThIs project
will be financed with Hotel/Motcl tax funds and IS the second of a multi-year program.
Justification: Kiplmg Street and the South 1-70 Frontage Road do not have continuous sIdewalks
allowmg pedestnan travel withm tins portion ofthe Hotel/Motel distnet.
4.
46th Ave.-nO, Estes-Carr Major Street Improvement
2005 Budget: $750,000
Description: This project consIsts of installatIOn of storm sewer and reconstruction ofthe street
section. ThIS is the second of a multi-year program for the area.
Justification: ThIS neighborhood has very poor drainage, which has resulted m dIstorted curblmes
and failed pavement sectIons.
5.
Public Improvements Projects, Development Driven
2005 Budget: $75,000
Description: Up-commg developments may require City-financed street improvements.
Justification: Contingent funding should be provided for specIal project needs.
-
6.
Street Light Installation
2005 Budget: $5,000
Description: InstallatIOn of new streetlights requested by cItizens or recommended by the
department and approved by the City
Justification: New street lighting IS provIded to accommodate areas ofthe City which require
additional hghting for safety or as otherwise Justified by the City
7.
Street Preventative Maintenance Projects
2005 Budget: $900,000
Description: The annual street preventative mamtenance work and costs are as follows.
Concrete replacement area.
Northwest area of the City between 1-70 and Kiplmg St.
from Clear Creek north to City limits
$200,000
Asphalt patchmg and overlay area.
32nd Avenue, KJplmg to Simms
38th Avenue, Sheridan to Wadsworth
48th Avenue, Harlan to Marshall
Marshall Street, Harlan to North CIty LImits
$500,000
189
ATTACHMENT 1
47TH PL
VE
44TH PL
I
J
V>
et::
W
-l
-l
:::!:
tn
w
I- <.)
Z
V> W
V> 0
Z
et:: W
0...
W
0 49TH AVE
z
KIPLING STREET PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT
l-
V>
"
z
:J
0...
~
---
---
---
49TH AVE
r
QV
l-
V>
et::
W
-l
-l
:::!:
l-
V>
"
z
:J
0...
~
l-
V>
W
W
-l
ATTACHMENT 2
l-
V>
W
<.)
Z
W
o
z
W
0...
W
o
z
---
47TH AVE
l-
V>
>=
45TH
..-
\
~
'C
(j)
;f ,1-\
O'l
c
'W
-%
::;
(l.
'" v.-
0
:0 \~ j
,.. .s
'" ~
oI- I
'" ro
"Z-'O '"
'" C t: '"
~5 ;; .<.
'"
E "Z-
0- 0
0 <!i
'7
0 gO
0 ",N ,..:'Z
~ii' "'-
"Z- "'0::
~~ "'I!) OLU
o . ':<.0 ~LU
",01:) 0- t=''Z
00 ",'" ifl-
'" . ?~ ~o
e:U1 0- o'Z
~t: 9b ~LU
"'
o
u
uiz
00
0-
~~
~,..J
\1.1::>
:r.~
~t-
u..0
ota
~ (/)
u 'i
\1.1
~
~
0-
~
-
~
"
t;
\1.1
~
0-
o
5
0-
~
'ti,\ ~ ~
~ " <>::I - .
~ -:;r- 'C'"" --
~ i~ ~ ~ '" T0 J'\ -~ ;:<;
i:1 ~ <'{ ~
-;r- -7 --r -:r Q(J '-C\ / ~
~€ .~ '" <::r
'" ""
0)-=0 ~ ..p.. -\A- '<f4.
~\ ~\ ~\
~ r" . -il
-)J- <t:J ~ ~ ""
~ ~ .~ -; 0('\ 1;
'" 1 c- .:J_
-.) ~ ~ -T ' - .::::. --;:. -r:. 0"
5 t; ~ ~
;/:\. .:.;
.y -...> I::::: tf\- If\.
X
~\ Q\ <l
<;: ~ \.(l' <>:)
" t2
~ cJ t<') ,; ~
..r ~ ~ ~ -;: ~ t:)
~ ~ ~ ,-;:. ..... -z ~
.,0 --r- / c,~
~ ,I, ~ -r
r::- r:- ~
~~ -
l~ ""- """ '*
% ~ ~ ~
if) l
Ul ~
0
~ ~
Ul 4
if) \ '"
- ~ ~ ~ ~
if)
0 ~ ~ ~
0 ~ ~ <!
0 ~ ... 1
" 'g ~
\ ~ ~ ~ ?5
z. - ~
0 ~ ~
~ z. ~~ i \ t ~
0 0 ~ V)
0 ~ \ uJii'. ~ ~ ~ I d
-z. 0 ~~ ~ \ ~ ~
uJ 9 lUlU <i:
;;- r- OO
'G
ill
...,
o
ct.
0..
~"t'"t'~ctttAeN"t' 3
ITEM NO' ~
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
'~$~' !
"
,q ~
COUNCIL MEETING DATE'
July 25,2005
TITLE:
APPROVAL OF PARTICIPATION IN THE XCEL ENERGY
QUALITY OF SERVICE PLAN PROCEEDINGS AT THE PUBLIC
UTILITIES COMMISSION
D PUBLIC HEARING
i:8J BIDS/MOTIONS
D RESOLUTIONS
D ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING (Date _)
D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
Quasi-JudicIal
Ci~d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Xcel Energy filed a required QualIty of ServIce Plan with the Public Utilities CommiSSIOn (PUC) on
July I, 2005. Staff recommends partIcipating in the proceedings JOIntly with many other cIties. Ken
Fellman of KiSSInger & Fellman, PC will be retained to represent the cities. The City of Wheat
Ridge would contribute $3,000 toward the legal fund managed by the City of Englewood.
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
Currently, the PUC monitors and regulates the servIce provided by the utilitIes, Including Xcel Energy.
The Quality of Service Plan approved for Xcel Energy by the PUC will impact the City and its
reSIdents. KnOWIng ofthe cItIes' Interest in thIS issue, the Colorado MUnIcipal League has facilitated
an economic means for all interested CIties to partIcipate In the PUC proceedings and be represented
by speCIal counsel. The City of Englewood has agreed that their outside counsel, Ken Fellman of
Kissinger & Fellman, P c., represent the interest of various cities and that a speCIal fund be managed
by Englewood to finance Mr Fellman's activitIes. Cities participating, or indicatmg strong interest in
participating m the joint representation include' Boulder, Broomfield, Englewood, Black Hawk,
Arvada, Evans, Aurora, Denver, Westminster, LOUIsville, Lafayette, Greenwood Village, SterlIng,
Glendale, Nederland and Walkins.
AL TERNA TlVES CONSIDERED:
N/A
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cooperative representation at the PUC is being funded by contributions from cities based upon
population. The fixed fee is ten cents per capita, with a maximum fee of$15,000 and a minimum fee
of $500 The City's contribution would be $3,000 and is available in the Professional Services
account of the Public Works Engineering budget, 01-302-700-750.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move that the City intervene m the Public Utilities Commission Docket No. 05A-268E, Xce\
Energy Electric Service Quality of ServIce Plan.
1 further move to engage the firm of Kissmger & Fellman, P c., Denver, Colorado to represent the
CIty at the Public Utilities CommisslOn:'
or,
"1 move that the City not intervene m the Pubhc UtIlities Commission Docket No. 05A-268E, Xcel
Energy Electric ServIce Quahty of Service Plan for the following reason(s)
Report Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
Tim Paranto, Public Works DIrector
Randy Young, City Manager
Attachments:
None
050725 xcel energy puc qsp
ITEM NO. ~
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
,(:i$~'
~~
I III UII
=-=.-.,
COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
July 25, 2005
TITLE:
RESOLUTION 38-2005 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2005 CAP IT AL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT
OF $15,981.70, ALONG WITH AWARDING ITB-OS-17 ESTES-
CARR MAJOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PHASE II
IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $765,981.70
o PUBLIC HEARING
o BIDS/MOTIONS
[g] RESOLUTIONS
o ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING (Date' _)
o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
Quasi-JudicIal:
~~
City Manag& d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The Estes-Carr Street Improvement Project, Phase II will reconstruct Dudley and Cody Street from
46th A venue to 1-70 South Frontage Road and the northern portion of Carr Street between 46th A venue
and 1-70 South Frontage Road. The project scope includes reconstruction of the failing streets caused
by poor dralllage, which has resulted III distorted curblines and failed pavement sections. ThIs is phase
two of a multi-phase project whIch will address the streets in the Clearvale Subdivision. On July 11,
2005, four (4) bids were received. The apparent lowest bidder was New Design Construction, Denver,
Colorado in the amount of$696,347 00. Their bid met all of the bid reqUIrements. References and
experience were evaluated by Public Works. Staff recommends award of the project to the lowest
responsive and responsible bIdder, New Design Construction in the bid amount of $696,347.00,
The City has been awarded a Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) grant in the amount of
$188,437.00 to assist in the financing of the street improvements in the Clearvale Subdivision. At the
December 13, 2004 CIty Council meeting, a motion allocating full jurisdictional award of CDBG grant
dollars to the Estes-Carr Phase II project was approved. The current crp Budget reflects $40,000 00
revenue from CDBG This account, 30-520-00-539, should be increased by $148,437.00 to reflect the
actual CDBG grant of$188,437 .00. CIP expenditure line item 30-303-800-842, 46th A venue - 1-70,
Estes-Carr Major Street Improvement project should be increased from $750,000.00 to 765,981.70 to
reflect the recommended low bid and a standard 10% contingency.
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
Bids for the Carr-Estes Major Street Improvement Project, #S-02-05, were opened on Monday, July
14,2005. Four (4) bids were received. The bids ranged from $696,347.00 to $1,098,75240. The
Engineer's Estimate for the project was $705,359.75 The lowest responsible and responsive bidder,
New Design ConstructIOn, Denver, Colorado has met the bid and qualification requirements. Based
upon the contractor's demonstrated capabilities and experience, Staff recommends award to new
Design Construction.
AL TERNA TIVES CONSIDERED:
No award and Phase II of Carr-Estes Major Street Improvement Project will not be accomplished.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funding for this program has been approved in the 2005 CIP budget in the amount of $750,000. A
CIP budget anlendment is requested for this project to increase CDBG projected revenues from
$40,00000 to $188,437.00 and the 46th Avenue - 1-70, Carr-Estes Major Improvement expenditure
from $750,000.00 to $765,981 70
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"1 move to approve Resolution 38-2005 - A Resolution amending the fiscal year 2005 Capital
Investment Program (CIP) budget to reflect the approval a supplemental budget appropriation to
provIde for utilizatIOn of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the amount of
$148,43700, along WIth awarding ITB-05-17 Estes-Carr Major Street Improvement Project, Phase II
III an amount not to exceed $765,981. 70.
or,
"I move to table indefinitely ResolutIOn 38-2005 - A ResolutlOn amending the fiscal year 2005 Capital
Investment Program (CIP) budget to reflect a supplemental budget appropriation to provide for
utilization of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in the amount of$148,437, along
with awarding ITB-05-17 Estes-Carr Major Street Improvement Project, Phase II in the amount of
$765,981 70 forthefollowing reason(s)
"
Report Prepared by:
RevIewed by'
Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works
Linda Trimble, Purchasmg Agent
Attachments:
1 2005 Capital Improvement Program Description
2. Project LocatIon Map
3. Bid Tab Sheet
4 Resolution 38-2005
050725 Request for City Council Action 46th CaFEstes Phase II
Capital Investment Program
3.
HoteVMotel District Pedestrian Improvements
2005 Budget: $200,000
Description: A porhon ofthe east side ofKlplmg Street south ofI-70 and the South 1-70
Frontage Road will be Improved by mstallation of sIdewalks and pedestnan lIghting. ThIs project
will be financed with HotellMotel tax funds and IS the second of a multI-year program.
Justification: Kipling Street and the South 1-70 Frontage Road do not have continuous sidewalks
allowmg pedestrian travel Wlthin thIs portIon ofthe HotellMotel distnct.
4.
5.
6.
7.
46th Ave.-I70, Estes-Carr Major Street Improvement
2005 Budget: $750,000
Description: This project consists of installatIOn of storm sewer and reconstruction ofthe street
sectIon. This is thc second of a multi-year program for the area.
Justification: This neighborhood has very poor drainage, which has resulted m distorted curblmes
and failed pavement sectIOns.
Public Improvements Projects, Development Driven
2005 Budget: $75,000
Description: Up-commg developments may reqUIre City-financed street Improvements.
Justification: Contingent fundmg should be provIded for special project needs.
Street Light Installation
2005 Budget: $5,000
Description: Installation of new streetlIghts requested by cItizens or recommended by the
department and approved by the City
Justification: New street lighting IS provided to accommodate areas ofthe City which require
additional lIghting for safety or as othelWlse Justified by the City
Street Preventative Maintenance Projects
2005 Budget: $900,000
Description: The annual street preventative mamtenance work and costs arc as follows:
Concrete replacement area.
Northwest area ofthe City between 1-70 and Kiplmg St.
from Clear Creek north to City limits
$200,000
Asphalt patchmg and overlay area.
32nd Avenue, Kipling to Simms
38th Avenue, Shendan to Wadsworth
48th Avenue, Harlan to Marshall
Marshall Street, Harlan to North City Limits
$500,000
189
ATTACHMENT 1
w
r
(j)
r
u
~
w;
~
J
o
0::::
CL
1$ "..,.,0
01'-'"
Cf5=
~ 1$ 3:>H30NJd30N'\
[JSIll'
'!i..
\,
lS~l)l
15 NQSnur
~
~
.
n
\
~ If
I ~
~,
.
ATTACHMENT 2
';l}
&, ~ r-
l1 '- ~ ~ ~I~ ~ -:r- ~ u; .r. ~
Ez "'" ..,l ..:;.. --;:
0.9 "' ~ -;;:>-r-- ---r- ~-z.-T
o'!! S
o.t,G ~ ~I'c
. ",C'l;::Z ""<t..J .,p,
~ ~.b' fu O? --:2..
0 it-~\D~Ul \.(\:'\
'i$~~O~~ ~ -:s-
() o..l.l) _r- ""
uiz oowo;:-lI>- -:t: ~~~'~~
a:. ' :)... ~ t9 ~~';J-$-1.
Qolllo'j::oZ ~ J) IJ
GO %t:~O~Ul ~ ~ -:T:2.-;r--?=--r
0- -";:"7""7"'" /'
~~ ~~ 5' ""
_0
'4,-1 ~ ,;..
u.I? ~
:x:~
~t- ~ <No
u-O ~.~ jl~ ~ ~~J"\'^~
oUi \~ '-
~ ~ u::/ .,;,.~ -;:.
t: -;r- --::>- ---r ~"'2";7--
<>
() ~:! l,c -
'ti\
~
G UCl ~-}~~
~ :s ~\~,~~-$ os-
"".
-c....~ ~ -::r
... "" -Q. ~ \(\
~~~ . c-
::::: <A
u.I
~ ~
:x: ~ \
0-
~ if)
\U ~ U
0 ~
d:: ~
() \U ;;:j ~ ~
~ if) ~ ~
-
if) % ~
'U, 0 ~ ~ ~
0 ~
u.I 0
" Q~
\ \\\.\ ~ ~
t) z ~ :
0
ex:: z. ~~ ~ .
uJ 0 0 .~ It \
...., 0 ~ i \Un:
~ ;;:0 ~
m 0 f@, ;;:j S I :0
'?, \U
0- /' l-
c
\l)
:1:
\ l~
~ '::( '6
.0 ~ \
.,...s 0 .~I
CO \.- Ul ...Q
g~ '(),~ ~\
z.-o~ UJ
uJet- 1..9
~ -.:J ~ Ii
------
A1'1'ActtMEN1' 3
RESOLUTION NO. 38
Series of 2005
TITLE:
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005
CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET TO
REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL
BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
$15,981.70, ALONG WITH AWARDING ITB-05-17 ESTES-
CARR MAJOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
PHASE II, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $765,981.70
WHEREAS, the City's current budget for Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) funds projection needs to be adjusted to reflect the increase in the actual amount
as determined by Jefferson County for 2005;
WHEREAS, the City has determmed to allocate the 2005 CDBG funds as
additional funds to extend a roadway improvement project in the HUD qualified area.
This funding will assist in the revitalization of the Clearvale SubdIvision.
WHEREAS, funds in the 46th Avenue - 1-70 Estes-Carr Major Street
Improvement CIP account should be mcreased as a result of this mcrease in CDBG
fundmg to finance the project;
WHEREAS, bids have been received for constructIon of the Estes-Carr Major
Street Improvement Project, Phase II;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows:
A. The City of Wheat Ridge fiscal year 2005 CIP Budget be amended
accordingly, specifically adjusting the Community Development Block
Grant line Item, account # 30-520-00-539, from $40,000 00 to
$188,437.00 and amend the 46th Avenue - 1-70, Carr-Estes Major Street
Improvement line Item, account # 30-303-800-846, from $750,000.00 to
$766,000 00
B Award the lIB-05-17, Estes-Carr Street Improvement Project, Phase II,
#S-02-05, to New Design Construction in the bid amount of $696,347 00.
C Approve a contingency amount of $69,634 70
ATTACHMENT 4
D. Authorize the Director of Public Works to issue change orders up to a total
contract and contingency amount of$765,981 70.
E. Authorize that all costs associated with this contract be paid from account
number 30-303-800-846, and that these funds be encumbered for the
length of the project in accordance with Ordinance #787,1989 Series.
DONE AND RESOLVED THIS _ day of July 2005.
Gretchen Cerveny, Mayor
ATTEST:
Pam Anderson, City Clerk
ITEMNO ~I
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
<"~0'
",,~;l'1
'0'~
1.,,$,.
-'''"",]. ,,,,,::;..,,,
...:. t, B";:"
1111 UII
.~
COUNCIL MEETING DATE'
July 25,2005
TITLE:
RESOLUTION 39-2005 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2005 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT
THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $21,000 TOWARDS THE
PURCHASE OF FOUR POLICE VEHICLES, ALONG WITH
APPROVING THE PURCHASE OF FOUR FULLY EQUIPPED
POLICE VEHICLES IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $129,000
o PUBLIC HEARING
o BIDS/MOTIONS
rgJ RESOLUTIONS
o ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING (Date. _)
o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
~
~~~
CIty Mana~
Quasi-Judicial:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff IS recommending the purchase of the followmg vehIcles. three (3) new model year 2005 Crown
Vlctona polIce option marked sedans to be added to the current fleet inventory in the Patrol & Traffic
Bureau Divisions, in order to accommodate vehicle needs of an increased patrol and traffic division
staff; one (1) new model year 2005 Crown Victoria police option unmarked sedan to replace one 2003
Crown Victoria in the Administration Division. Unit 95 was involved m an accident in July of this
year resultmg in damage to the vehIcle that is beyond repair. The city was not at fault for the accident
mvolving Unit 95 and CIRSA will be recovering $13,45000 for replacement of Unit 95. After
applying a $10,000 00 deductible the city will receive $3,450.00 to offset the costs of replacing Unit
95 All four vehicles are available through the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Bid
Award #07006YYY08M. The costs of the vehIcles will be $82,709 00 and the additional equipment
and installations are estimated to be $46,291.00 for an amount not to exceed $129,00000. An
addItIonal budget appropriation of $21,000.00 is required for the purchase of four fully equipped
police vehicles.
COMMISSIONfBOARD RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
City Council approved a supplement budget appropriation of $108,000 for the purchase of three
additIonal police patrol sedans on June 27, 2005 in conjunction with approval of additional Police
Department staff. The police staff sedan destroyed in a recent accident should be replaced at thIS time
to maintain an adequate police fleet. The costs of the new police vehIcles includes the vehicle
purchase pnces and the costs of installing radios, light bars, other auxiliary equipment and paint
detailing. The costs of the vehicles will be $82,70900 and the additional equipment and installations
are estImated to be $46,291.00 for an amount not to exceed $129,000.00. An additional $21,00000 is
required for the purchase offour fully equipped police vehicles.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
N/A
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The funds for the purchase of the three, marked polIce patrol vehIcles are budgeted in the 2005 PublIc
Works Department General Fund budget, Account Number 01-303-800-807, Fleet Replacement as a
result of the June 27, 2005 City Council approved supplemental budget appropnation from General
Fund unreserved fund balance in the amount of $108,000 00. Funding for the purchase ofthese three
polIce vehicles plus one, unmarked police administration vehicle exceeds the current Fleet
Replacement budget requiring an additional appropriation from General Fund reserves m the amount
of $21 ,000 00
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Resolution 39-2005 - A resolutIOn amending the fiscal year 2005 General Fund
Budget to reflect the approval of a Supplemental Budget Appropnatwn in the amount of $21 ,000.00
towards the purchase of four police vehicles, along with approving the purchase offour fully equipped
police vehicles m the amount not to exceed $129,00000."
or,
"I move deny approval of ResolutIOn 39-2005 - A resolutIOn amending the fiscal year 2005 General
Fund Budget to reflect the approval of a Supplemental Budget Appropriation in the amount of
$21,000 00 towards the purchase of four police vehicles, along with approving the purchase of four
fully equipped polIce vehicles m an amount not to exceed $129,000.00 for the followmg reason(s)
"
Report Prepared bY'
Reviewed by:
Greg Knudson, Operations Manager
Tim Paranto, Director ofPubhc Works
Attachments:
I. Fleet Replacement Guidelines
2. State of Colorado Price Agreement for Large Pollce Patrol Sedan
3. ResolutiOn 39-2005
050725 CAF 4police sedans 2005
OPERATIONS DIVISION
-
City ofWhP.at Ridge
Department of Public Works
FLEET REPLACEMENT GUILDlINES
The current fleet replacement guidelines are based upon the age and mileagelhours of the unit.
Old age or high mileagelhours does not automatically justify replacement, but instead triggers an
investigation into all reasons for replacement as noted below.
. High and/or rising maintenance/repair costs.
. High and/or rising operating cost (fuel economy).
. Excessive downtime
. Past useful service, technological, or economical life (see definitions below).
. Parts/service no longer available.
. Federal, state and/or local requirements render unit not legally usable.
. Overall mechanical condition.
. Overall physical appearance.
. User distrust and/or dissatisfaction due to perceived unsafe condition of vehicle based
upon high mileage.
. Poor utilization (unit too big, small for job, seasonal use only, etc.). If possible, a unit that
has no other deficiencies other than poor utilization will be moved within the fleet rather
than deleted.
DEFINITIONS
Service Life: Refers to the amount of time a unit is capable of operating and rendering service.
This life may be indefinite if the unit receives adequate maintenance and worn out parts are
dutifully replaced.
Technological Life: Represents the relative productivity decline of a unit when compared to a
newer unit.
Economical Life: Refers to the length of time that the average total vehicle cost is at its
minimum.
ATTACHMENT 1
FLEET REPLACEMENT GUILDUNE TABLES
LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES (UNDER 8,600 GVWR)
Description Hours/Miles Years
Police Patrol Sedan - Marked 80,000 miles 2 t04
Police Patrol Sedan - Unmarked 80,000 miles 2t04
Police Sedan - Administrative 80,000 miles 8 to 10
Police TrucklVan 80,000 miles 8 to 10
Police Motorcycle 30,000 mites 4t05
Police Patrol SUV 80,000 miles 2 to 4
Administrative Sedans 80,000 miles 8 to 10
Light Duty Small TruckNan 80,000 miles 8 to 10
MEDIUM DUlY VEHICLES (8,600 to 10,000 GVWR)
Description HourslMiles Years
Van, Truck w/Gasoline Engine 100,000 miles 10 to 12
Van, Truck wlDiesel Engine 150,000 miles 10 to 15
HEAVY DUTY VEHICLES (OVER 10,000 GVWRI AND HEAVY EQUIPMENT
Description Hours/Miles Years
Single-Axle Dump Truck wlPlow 150,000 miles 10 to 12
Tandem-Axle Dump Truck w/Plow 150,000 miles 10 to 12
Stfeet Sweeper-Mechanical 10,000 hours/30,OOO miles 8 to 10
street Sweeper-Vacuum 8,000 hours/30,OOO miles 8 to 10
Jet Radder (storm sewer cleaner) 10,000 hours 12 to 15
Articulated Loader 10,000 hours 12 to 15
Backhoe 10,000 hours 12 to 15
Grader 10,000 hours 12 to 15
Tractor w/1mplements 10,000 hours 12 to 15
Note: These replacement guidelines figures are an average of the figures being used by other Front Range municipalities
~.-w- --~~~---.. ..... - - ~ .... .... ..... .................. ............ '''''......v..Vo..1
ri:1bv 1 Vi 0
Agreement Number'
07006YYY08M
MANDATORY
Agreement Status:
Current
State of Colorado
Price Agreement
:~:. <.;
Category:
Vehicles
Commodity Description.
Sedan, Large, Patrol
Division of Finance and Procurement
State Purchasing Office
22S E. 16th Ave, Suite 802
Denver, CO 80203
Period Covered.
09/18/2003 - 07/0112005
Please direct purchasing agent
inquiries on 1his award to'
Michael Wallace at (303) 866-6143
Option to Renew for 1 More Year(s)
Commodity Code 070-06
Contract Status: Not applicable
Amendment Number: Amendment Effective on:
Reason For Amendment:
Amendment History:
Ordering Information
Contact: Don Stafford
Order Number: 303-232-2200 x1362
Toll Free Number'S00-510-3673
Fax: 303-234-5781
Company'
Does Business
As'
Address:
City, State, Zip
LAKEWOOD FORD mc
LAKEWOOD FORD mc
11000 WEST COLFAX
LAKEWOOD, CO 80215-
3727
Contact Email'
Terms:
F.O.B:
Delivery'
Minimum Order'
This Agreement Results from Solicitation Number- IFB-AF A- VElllCLES-MW -04
Conditions of Agreement:
IN IFord Crown \1ctoria \Sedan. lar~e patrol ILakewood Ford IGasoline l=:::J
Vehicle Price $23,321 00
lfthe Police Package #500 is deleted, then $4133.00 is creditied. Base Price would then be
$19,194.00.
.http://wwwgssa.state.co.usIPriceA wd.nsflbOb 1 c9ac1 b0f27fd872S6794006211 b8/2b888d4 h
ATTACHMENT 2
11/8/2004
~ ~~ ......--....~_...... ..... _ .................... ..... ..... ................. ....v.. ,.......l.lJ.VJV.>
r<1g,c L Ul 0
Please see .~ttached letters below f()f information on option changes fOf Model Year 2005
~~'lhtl
~'
l'Td Di450_0407150951.pd Crown Vie 05 Option.FfJF
Original Options.
[(j
, A7.pd.
The above options may still apply, but please refer to the below fOf possible changes/updates:
m'~l
ffii.~
fut Di4!lJ_ O407150952.pd
Contact vendor for delivl!ry charges outside Metro Denver area.
OPTIONS PLEASE contact vendor for option availability, specifications, etc. Options for
the above vehicle ONLY below:
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDIllONS:
USAGE: This award will be used by General Support Services, the Division of Central Services, State Fleet
Management (SFM), which provides vehicles to various State agencies and institutions of higher education.
Additionally, Political Subdivisions (Counties, Cities, School Districts) may also use this Award at their discretion.
LEASE/PURCHASE: These vehicles will be obtained through the use of third-party financing (\ease purchase or
installment purchase) as performed during pOOr years. State payment for vehicles financed through a third party is
contingent upon payment to or for the State by such third party. All vehicles purchased or leased will be titled to
the State.
VEHICLE CONFIGURA T10N: All vendors shall include, at the minimum, all manufacturer standard new vehicle
equipment Exceptions to options will be allowed only if the basic requirements of the Standard Specifications are
essentiaBy unaltered. The State will be sole judge of what consliMes an allowable exception.
Vehicles shall be of the same make, model, and equipment level as specified on PO. NO SUBSTITUllONS WILL
BE ALLOWED. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GV'NR) bid shall meet or exceed minimum GV'NR specified in
base vehicle configuration.
Vehicles shall be delivered complete; that is, with all manufacturer standard equipment, and in compfiance with
the SFM Standard Specifications and requested optional items as listed on the SFM purchase order. SFM
reserves the right to return a vehicle, after acceptance, that is not complete according to SFM Standard
Specifications and any state purchase order, if later found to be in violation. Vendor shall promptly ,correct vehicle
to award specification or correct financially to SFM satisfaction,
Options fisted shall be bid and provided as factory installed under the tenns of the full, factory-backed, bumper to
bumper warranty. This includes but is not timited to: air conditioning, radios, cruise control, bumpers, towing
packages, tow hooks, etc. Dealer-installed options will not be permitted unless pre-approved by the State in
writing and, where appficable, indicated on bid sheet as a "dealer installed" non-factory item. If dealers substitute
a non-OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) option in their bid, in place of an available OEM option, the State
may return the vehicle for a correctly equipped one any time after the non-OEM option is discovered, and/or
require the vendor to make payment to SFM for all expenses plus hand6ng fees to repair a non-OEM option that
http.l/www.gsS<Lstate.co.usfPriceAwd.nsf/bOblc9ac 1 b0f27fd87256794006211 b8/1b888d4 '". 11/8/2004
rag\::.J Vi 0
fails within 3 years or 36,000 miles, and/or initiate suspension/debarment proceedings.
Options not specifically included in the lFB shall be provided by the vendor at a cost that is not higher than the
Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price (MSRP).
TIres: TIres are typically specified as AU SeasonlMud and Snow radials. All Terrain tires are a more aggressive
tread pattern and on a 4X4 truck, are open side lug. Closed lug design tires called All Terrain by the OEM or
dealer are not acceptable by SFM for an All Terrain tire option. Vendor shall provide open side lug All Terrain tires
when specified by SFM purchase order.
DATES AND CONFIRMATIONS REQUIRED:
For each vehicle ordered, Vendors shall complete and return a Vendor Confirmation form (see
Exhibit C) to SFM or other ordering agency as soon as it is available, but no later than five (5)
working days after notification from the manufacturer. This fOfm shall include the following
information:
1. Date vendof receives SFM PO
2. Manufacturer's factory order # and date received.
3. Manufacturer's factory production date
4. Estimated date of delivery to SFM or ordering agency.
The dealer shall notify SFM no later than 10 business days that they have no OEM
confirmation. The dealer shall inform SFM immediately by phone and in writing when the
dealer is aware or suspects that there is a problem with an order Of a production date from the
factory The dealer shall demonstrate to the STATE OF COLORADO all efforts made to secure
vehicles. My dealer failing to supply estimated delivery dates may be considered non
responsive.
SPECIAL CONDIllONS OF BID:
If an awarded vendor is either unable to provide a vehicle(s}, or is unable to provide them
within a reasonable time, the State reserves the right to cancel that order and place the order
with th~ next lowest bidder or to conduct another bid. Unless otherwise approved by SFM or
the ordering agency, all model year 2003 vehicles, ordered as a result of this IFB, shall be
delivefed and invoiced no later than June 30, 2003 or as specified by SFM. Special equipped
vehicles will be bid and awarded separately (i.e. handicapped busses, large cargo vans).
In the event that OEM is unable to deliver ordered vehicle(s) within model year ordered, SFM
reserves the right to choose out of dealer stock a unit(s) as close to original specification. SFM
will be invoiced at awarded state price with OEM to reimburse dealer any difference in cost.
This will only apply to vehicles ordered prior to build-out and considered within normal and
acceptable ordering and build time frames. Vehicles ordered by SFM after last order date has
been announced by OEM will not be subject to this clause. Dealer acknowledges that the OEM
has partnered to provide factory incentives to dealer in the overall interest of the state.
Vehicles that are ordered prior to build-out and considered within normal and acceptable
ordering and build timeframes are expected to be delivered through dealer within usual Spring
delivery timeframe of current model year. SFM and SFM's customer is caused harm and
expense when vehicles are "rolled ovef" to the next model year. Should OEM not build and
deliver on a timely basis (strike and similar situations beyond contfol of OEM excepted), SFM
will count this as a delivery and performance issue that may jeopardize future awards
regardless of low bid status.
Due to state budget conditions, SFM cannot accept any vehicles (except Public Safety
http://www gssa.state.co.uslPriceA wd.nsflbObl c9ac 1 b0f27fd87256794006211 b8/2b888d4.. 11/8/2004
.L us.... , VL U
undercover and Patrol vehicles) prior to March 1, 2004. Vendors shall make delivery
after this date. Note: Public Safety undercover and Patrol Vehicles may be accepted
after the award(s) are made.
Starting in early fall, 2003, SFM will be ordering law enforcement vehicles for the Colorado
Department of Public Safety and State Patrol as early orders for delivery starting
approximately November 2003. SFM will coordinate this with the awarded dealer. All other
terms & conditions set forth in this General Conditions will apply.
Bids are requested for 2004 model year vehicles only. It is anticipated that awards will be in
place during the fourth quartef of the 2003 calendar year and will remain in place through
factory fleet close dates for 2004 models-late spring through early summer of 2004. If a model
year change occurs during this time, or if the awarded vendor will allow, 2005 model year
vehicles may be sold under the terms, conditions, and prices of the 200 model year awards at
the sole discretion of the SPO. Extension of the existing Agreement(s) will occur, and the
length of the extension, along with any other applicable considerations will be agreed to
between the SPO and the vendor. Changes to existing Terms and Conditions are at the sole
discretion of the SPO. Model year substitutions MUST be approved by the SPO, SFM or the
Of de ring agency.
Vendor shall notify SFM immediately of any mid-year model changes including
discontinuations, mid-yeaf introductions, etc., as related to specific body code vehicle included
on an IFB/price agreement.
PAYMENT TERMS:
The State's payment terms for this bid are net 20 days. Every effort will be made by SFM or
the ordering agency to assure payment will occur within twenty (20) days from date of delivery.
In payment of delivered vehicles, the State will issue, or cause to be issued by its third-party
financing company, payment instruments.
All payments issued undef the resulting agreement will be directly referenced and sent to the
awarded vendor ONLY. No third-party billing or payments (i.e. GMAC) will be allowed under
the agreement. This applies to ANY agency or political subdivision using the resulting
agreement( s).
Vendors are reminded that the State cannot guarantee payment terms for MAPO agencies, or
political subdivisions. Most ordering entities have remitted payment in a timely matter in
the past, and vendors should confirm individually with the ordering agency all payment terms.
Dealer agreements with third-parties (GMAC, Wells Fargo, etc.) will have no effect on any of
the payment tefms and conditions. No security interest or similar interest between a
dealeflvendor and their financing company will be applicable to any State agency or political
subdivision purchasing vehicles from the resulting price agreements.
POINTS OF CONTACT: Questions regarding this price agreements should be directed to the
Purchasing Agent above or SFM, 303-289-5042, or the non-state ordering agency contact as
indicated on confirming purchase orders.
http.llwww gssa.state.co.usIPriceA wd,nsffbOb 1 c9acl b0f27fd87256794006211b8/2b888d4... 11/8/2004
.L u6'" ..J V.I.. V
NOTE ON WARRANlY DOCUMENTS:
In some cases, a manufacturer may offer the same warranty coverage for many vehicles in
their product line For bidders who are offering bids on several vehicle categories that have the
same coverage, warranty information as required on bid sheets need be submitted only once.
Bidders shall indicate on EACH bid a clear reference to the appropriate warranty document(s).
DELlVERY(SFM ONLY):
The State's terms are FOB destination with freight included to destinations in metropolitan
Denver (6 county area-Denver, Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Douglas, and Jefferson). Delivery
to Department of CorrE:lctions in Canon City, will be FOB destination with freight included, and
wjJJ be coordinated with venders who are in close proximity. Other Deliveries outside metro
Denver is FOB destination with freight added. Delivery charges outside of metfo Denver are to
be agreed upon between the ordering agency and the awafded vendor, prior to delivery. Any
ordering agency may arrange to pick up a vehicle from the awarded vendor at no additional
charge.
For vehicles delivered to other SFM designated agency locations such as Colorado State
Patfol, Department of Corrections, and Department of Transportation, vendors shall notify SFM
of scheduled delivery to designated agency at least one day prior to the delivery. .
Deliveries of new vehicles will be pre-approved by SFM to facilitate available resources and
expedite delivery times. Vendors shall call SFM at least one working day before delivery.
Vendors shall have the P.O. number available and the number of vehicles to be delivered
when calling. New vehicles will be accepted between the hours of B am to 12 noon and 2 PM
to 4 PM. Monday through Friday. No deliveries will be made 3 business days prior to the
end of the month. Also, no deliveries on State holidays, which include for 2003' May 26TH,
and July 4TH. If vendor shows up at SFM without an appointment, the vendor may be turned
away until a scheduled appointment is available
VEHICLE DELIVERY CONDITION:
The following requirements apply to vehicles at time of delivery to SFM:
Vendors shall bring these items into the SFM office (all documents shall be typed):
1. The dealer's invoice with a typed VIN, the State Purchase Order #, and the dealer's stock #.
2. The manufacturer's window sticker with price and option info. Do not leave the sticker on
the vehicle door glass.
3. The manufacturer's "Certificate of Origin" with a typed assignment as follows (there shall be
no corrections):
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF CENTRAL SERVICES
1001 EAST 62ND AVE
DENVER, CO 80216
4. The Application for Title and/or Registration.
5. Two ~ets o! keys plus the ~ey code (usually on a sticker or tag) needed for key duplication.
6. A weight slip shall be proVided whenever a body has been modified. This includes hi-cube
vans, box trucks and buses.
Vendors shall leave in the vehicle:
http.l/www.gssa.state.co.us/PriceAwd.nsflbOblc9ac1b0f27fd87256794006211b8/2b888d4...1118/2004
.1 ats\:; v Vi 0
7. The owner's manual visible on the front seat
8 The dealer stock # on the windshield
9. A forty-five(45) day permit shall be attached in the license plate area on the rear of the
vehicle.
10. Vehicles shall be washed, serviced and in standard "make ready" condition; i.e ,prepared
for immediate use including no less than one quarter (1/4) tank reading of fuel. Vehicles
delivered with less than 1/4 tank fuel will be refused.
SFM shall make a cursory visual check of the delivered vehicle's condition and options to
expedite the delivery process. However, should any problems be found after delivery, SFM has
four (4) weeks to inspect and reject vehicle while the vehicle is still on SFM's lot. The dealer
shall retrieve the vehicle within one business day of notification for correction/repairs and
redeliver said vehicle as soon as the repairs are complete. The dealer will expedite repairs to
its maximum capability, so as not to cause undo financial hardship to the STATE OF
COLORADO. This is in addition to terms found under vehicle configuration.
VEHICLE DEUVERY CONDITION:
The following requirements apply to vehicles at time of delivery to SFM:
Vendors shall bring these items into tha SFM office (all documents shall be typed):
1. The dealer's invoice with a typed VIN, the State Purchase Order #, and the dealer's stock #.
2. The manufacturer's window sticker with price and option info Do not leave the sticker on
the vehicle door glass.
3, The manufacturer's "Certificate of Origin" with a typed assignment as follows (there shall be
no corrections):
STATE OF COLORADO, DCS
1001 EAST 62ND AVE
DENVER, CO 80216
4. The Application for Title and odometer statement.
5. Two sets of keys plus the key code (usually on a sticker or tag) needed for key duplication.
6. A weight slip shall be provided whenever a body has been modified. This includes hi-cube
vans, box trucks and buses, stake beds, for example.
Vendors shall leave in the vehicle:
7. The owner's manual visible on the front seat
8. The dealer stock # on the windshield
9. A forty-five(45) day permit shall be attached in the license plate area on the rear of the
vehicle.
10. Vehicles shall be washed, serviced and in standard "make ready" condition; i.e., prepared
for immediate use including no less than one quarter (1/4) tank reading of fuel. Vehicles
delivered with less than 1/4 tank fuel will be refused.
11. SFM shall make a cursory visual check of the delivered vehicle's condition and options to
expedite the delivery process. However, should any problems be found after delivery, SFM has
four (4) weeks to inspect and reject vehicle while the vehicle is still on SFM's lot. The dealer
shall retrieve the vehicle within one business day of notification for correction/repairs and
redeliver said vehicle as soon as the repairs are complete. The dealer will expedite repaifs to
its maximum capability, so as not to cause undo financial hafdship to the STATE OF
COLORADO. This is in addition to terms found under vehicle configuration.
9.0 DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAPO AGENCIES
http.llwww.gssa.state,co.usIPriceAwd.nsflbOb 1 c9ac1 b0f27fd87256794006211 b8/2b888d4 '". 11/812004
--V"'................~--~.. ~ - ...................... .& ..... ....................... ...."'.1. 1 '"'J..I.~Vl'-'>.J'
r<1nC J Vi 0
9.1 CHARGES ALLOWED
All SFM purchases will NOT be charged for delivery. However, MAPO locations outside of the
Denver Metro area (as defined below) may be charged a delivery fee, Vendors MUST indicate
below either a flat fee, or a per-mile-fee for delivery.
NO DELIVERY CHARGE FOR THESE COUNTIES!!!!
Denver Metro: Denver, Arapahoe, Adams, Weld, Boulder, Jefferson, Douglas, EI Paso, Elbert,
and Morgan Counties.
NO DELIVERY CHARGE FOR THESE COUNTIES!!!!
All other counties in Colorado may incur delivery charges. Vendors need to indicate below the
applicable charges:
Flat fee for delivery: $
Counties:
Fee-Per -Mile' $
Counties:
Vendors may NOT combine both above, but may indicate applicability. For instance, a Pueblo
County delivery may be charged a flat fee delivery charge, but Mesa County might be charged
at the fee-per-mile-rate
Vendors MUST indicate above which delivery charges will apply, and also indicate the
applicable counties.
The fees above are all-inclusive, and separate charges, such as chase drivers, etc. will NOT
apply.
DELIVERY INSTRUCTIONS FOR MAPOIPOLITICAL SUBS
All MAPO agencies MUST specify on the Purchase Order OR commitment document all
delivery Terms and Conditions that apply. None of the delivery instructions shall be
inconvenient to the vendof. but should be along the lines of the established SFM delivery
instructions, or from past orders by the MAPO agency.
If the delivery instructions afe issued to the Vendor, the Vendor MUST comply with them, or,
contact the MAPO agency and clarify, or, change the delivery instructions after notifying the
MAPO agency.
The SPO should be notified immediately of all problems regarding the deliveries of vehicles for
MAPO agencies
Close Out Date. Vendor shall notify SFM of the close out date for this model as soon as that
information is available
http://www,gssa,state,co.us/PriceAwd.nsflbOb 1 c9ac 1 b0f27fd87256794oo6211b8/2b888d4, 1118/2004
October 21, 2004
Mithael Wallace
Purchasing Agent
STATE 01 COLORADO
GSS, Div of Purchasing, 225 E. 16th Ave, Ste 802
Denver CO 80203
Re: STATE PRICE AGREEMENT #07006YYY08M - BODY CODE A7
Dear Michael
When you approved the renewal of State Price Agreement 007006YYY08M JOT tbe 2005 Ford Crown
Victoria "Police Interceptor," there were two new options that were designated "Late Availability" with the
pricing "Not Yet Available." Following is the updated informatiou:
ODflOll tOIle (iOS "ADtomatk 8re Suooressiol\ Smem-: MSBP Is $2,500.00. state lid 'lice Is $2,245.00. ThiS
0I)li00 can De ontere4lntmedialeIJ bllt Job #1 Jl[OOlIt1ioII does not ~ lIIl1i1 MardI, 2005.
'0800 (Ode fi5I "tiAly-tof-lbe-RtAD- Padl~ MmP is $4;090.00. Slate Ild PriCe IS $3.660.00. 1bis oplion
tall be onlered lmI1edialelJ and JOb #1 produdion Is SdledUlell (0 ~ In Detember, 2004.
I am including a revised copy of the "Option-to-Reoew" Proposal with the State Bid I'rice Comparison
between the 2005 vs 2004 model year. The only r~ision is the additioB of the prices of the above options on
page #3. You may want to replace the original on the State I'rice Agrttmellt website with this revised copy.
Mter you have had an opportunity to review this information, please contact me if you have any
questions and/or concerns.
Respectfully,
~
Don Stafford,
F1ul Milnager
C.C.; Ron Clatterbuck
Kyle Shelton
~~:-i&~~,j~~~~~f~ti&;7~~:l~~~~~€~i;%~{E~~t~;~?~~~~5f:;5f;r~t
11000 W. Colfax Avenue
Lakewood, CO. 8021r
303 . 232 - 220C.-
www.fordlandl.com
1.aOO.S10-FORD(3673)
JulJ 15, 2004
Mithael Wallace
Purthasilll! ~nl
STAn 01 COLORADO
GS!, DiY 01 'orchasiJlR, 225 t. 16Ch Ave., Sle 802
Denver (0 80203
Ie: "OUlloll te lelleW''' 'Anesll. Statt Pritt A!remeul #07006YY\'ClSH . BodJ Code A7
JearXf. 'Ianace,
lakewood FonIlaDC1. Int., on bel\aIl ollortl Kolor eOlllll31\Y, Is !)\eased 10 oller Ille Slale 01 eolorallo a "Rollover- (JIrIce
pro1edion) oIllle Slate Pt1re II.!reeI1tIIl #0700tiYYY08M lor IIIe 2005 Ford trown VlctOl1a "P()Ii(t Inlerreptor-. 11lis
l'oukl be tile IirsI fear 01 me -OPlioo to leoew lor 2 Kore Years- ( see atlaclUneut). 11te period rotered by tIlis oller
wm lie lDuIedlate1J IIDOIllssUance of new auo 10 laleWood for1IIan{t tbroiJeh me ead OIl1le 2005 DlO(\e\ year ( laSl
onItl dale Is antlciPaled IB JUlIe. 2005 ).
l1Ie beneIiI, 10 lIle Slate of Colorado, 01 acttp(\Di lhis oller ViIl be oblious. You WiD rettiYe 2004 Ilr_ on lIle 2005
tvPl, ll1er.flarllel lQlliPmem, Dealer tlllOm, Sbop KanualS anclledocea 'ncIM on m( lXlenl1etl Wammfies. AlSO,
lbe stale and POlilital SlIIHIiYisiOns Will lie aIlIe to onJer 2005 tVPIs imDJedialetJ.
'I1Ii5 "Ioftover" oDer 1i'iIllndode:
1) TIle 2005 ([OWl V"ldoria "Polite IntercePlor- priced eladlJ as lIle 2004 mOOelIn lIle Slate Ptice Agreem.ent
0100tiYYY0SM.
feature and SpedIkafioB tbaDl!tS to tJle 2005 JOOOeI are lisIed below:
. Indel' hood ~ Is tletelell
. Whip lalIio ADIeIIDa OIl til!Itl rear lIIlarler panel replaces embedded anlenna In rear 'Ii1dow.
2) 18 llsIed '1adOrY 'Pllolf' prlted exacoJ as mey were In me Slate price Agreement 070t6mOSK, ilt1u0in~ aU
ladOll opflOllS listed II 1I1adU1lenl "e-. Willi lIIe IoDowln2 excepfions:
. Slate option 255 Alt fUd . factory Opljon 7601 CVPI NGV ( Narl Gas VeIlide) Is HOlONGER AVAIlAIll.
. HEW factory tpelon. - AmMA.TIC RRE StlPPIWSIOli mltJr' ( itS ). Utt 1\'111l11i1ilJ . Pritiat a IItlld lYlllalllt
. NEW Factory Option. "VISlBllIlY IME PAClAGF' (6511).JlWl Is $1,845.... Slatt Prict a $1,672.00
. NEW fatlory Option. -lEADy.tor-tIIe-ROAD PAtlAGr {651 )-Utt l\'lllibllkJ' PIIdnt aNtt It/inHate
. lIFl factory GprIOR. ..,em llUTRlBmON 101 . fRONT' ( 661) 'lISlIP Is $~5." - Slatt 1'Itce Is $89.00
. lIFl factory Opflon . "POUtE POWER PIGTAIL- << m-1) -1lSllP \s $25.98 . $lilt Prict h $24.00
.. - - -. - - .' - .. -- - -. - -. . - .. -< . .. - - - - " - - ~ - - ~.
11000 W. Colfax Avenue
Lakewood, CO. B0215
303 - 232 - 2200
www.fordlandl.com
1-BOO.S10.FORD(3673)
(2)
3) AIl listed "Alter -Market ODtions" priced exactlY as they were In lIle State PrKe AtreemenI1l7006YYY08M: Ibis,
alSO, \ntlooa aU Mter-Marliet opt\ons "sled \n Atlaclllnenl "D".
4) All listed "Dealer Ootions" priced exactly as \hey were in the Stale Price Agreement 07006YYY08H Alladunent
"J".
5} AIllistet1 "InoD >>anuals" pncet1 exactlY as they were in me Slale price Atreemenl 0700timOSM AUadlment
"D".
ti) AIlINet1. '"fM( lxttlllled Warranties" in lhe Slate pnee A21eement 07000YYYOSM AIlac1Ullenl -r willi reduced
JJJ1t!!Ji (see atlactlllent).
Al1er JOU haYe IlatI an O(lportunitJ 10 renew 1bls Inlormat\Ol\, lllease OOl\lad me it you havt lIl\J q1ltS00Ils anlllor I any
ol1lliS lDlormatiOa is meal or I addi1iooallntormation Is needed, 'l11aIl} JOIIlor l!iviJlg lIS tile owortunilJ to sene
you aDO llOOi tomnIto w~ db you aDO tile State ol tolorilOO oUl1nt lIus new nollet year.
_. ~
fto- ~
POD Slll!!Dnl,
fleet KaDal!Cl'
t.t.; Ion aanertlllCl, Slale Heel xew lelllcte toorllillalOf
IJle lbellOB, COIOrallo Slale PalrO!
Terry lJan, lMt RtIDOUaI G\)lel1llllelll J(ana~
lIIlacllllellls: topy 01 Slate Pike Al!reeltteDl.7006lYY08X (oler Sheet wi Oplioalo Renew SlaIemenl
One H~ 2005 11 2004 Mte tomtlartson l'fO\lllSlll
2005 Police lDIercentOf aJllI Special Senlce VellkIe llIeraJure
"Option to Renew" Proposal
Iti/te Plitt "freement #OltJOfiYffOSH I 80df (ode Al
lmfOOD fORDWlD,1lt.
Hed 1enim fJiFiIIg/l
11800 Well tollaIlve
We....., ct 8t21S
DOlI RaIItr.. fled lIi1Dater
001232-2200 cl.1362
lor
HicbaellYaDace
State 01 [Olorado
r_______________________________________________________________
2005 Proposed Pricln! vs 2004 stale Bid Price
r___'_______________..___________________________________________
TIllS lOUr (4) page Proposallnduaes a complete aUll comprellensiu })litt tOftlI)al1soD 01 Ole 2004 10m crown Victorla "Pollce
Jntertep(or" ( CVPI ) ftwardell on Slale Price ~eemenl #01OO6m88M (Body toae 11 ) ana the 2005 Mooel tVPlllropost(1
as I "'Prlct ProIectetlltoDoyer. TI1lS pme comparisoll ildul\eS Ole base 'elUde, 811 arallable lactoll opOons, dealer opOons,
mop mmals, eItenaell stmtt POlities, atler-marliet equipment and new ladory epOoDS.
OfOerlodt D~rtD"OD
mn or (flOWe .IIU AGRF.EMFXf #07006mOSM
I1eI1s 6114 ()plions 1RdRIIet1l1J J/IJ/e PORce PId6(!e #5N Be l11diak:d Jf/JJJ ..
P11 2005 lORD mOWl( \'lemmA "POUtllN'lERtEPTlR"
P7t eum IPn,,,s
'72Ol (WI Base VdIlde lrilIl PatUte w/3.Z11a1io lxle, lIldldes:
'13OA (WI lase VeIUde Tr\m famie '1/3.55 Balio 1iIIIted Slip A1le
75IA CYPl nmT APPfABAIltI Padal!e 'II 3.2'1 Ballo Axle
7701 OPI nmT lPPf.UAN(l Paelate w/3.55lilio llJIllletl SlIp AIle
PA(IAGES aid 'It"S:
4tA lOMFOIT & tlliVBllEKE BOCP, badldes:
m lAMP PItE-WIIE GB.OtP,lnclndes:
53M BADlO Nom SWPmsION PAmAGE, lDduaes:
65A POlItI pm PAtlAGE - WE, IntlUdes:
68P POIICI pm PAtlAGE - tOMPlIIE, Includes:
65W mmBm PAenGE, (Requires 68'), inclUdes:
6GB srm:r APPEAIWKE PltlAGE, Inclndes:
Page 1 of4
10/21/2004
lAKEWOOO FORDlAND, INC.
Don Stafford. Fleet Manager
(303) 232.2200 el<!. 1362
2005 State 2004 Slale Dil1erence
Rid Ptltt RiI1Pt1te
23,327 .00 23,321.'0 0.00
~
Ii
".,zita:
.
"n..,.. 19,194.00 19,194.00 0.00
~jj~=!.
~_..
~ .." .." ...0
.....~
149.10 149.0. 1.10
tsUO 138." 0.00
296." 29(j." I.~
781." 18tH 0.00
46." 4Utl 0.00
It~ 81." 81.00 0.00
639.0' Ci3UO 0.00
:t~.;.~.<j: 1,'186.0' 1,1811.00 0.00
i:'~
,~;. '.
~~
@~~ 896.0. 8%." 0.00
.,.~:!-'*
138." 138." 11.00
2005 CVP\ Rou.OVER PROPOSAL
2005 vs 2004 CVPI PRICING
2005 stale
Bid Price
Order Code Description
128
153
151
172
11S
1TI
185
181
189
432
435
436
431
438
439
418
525
553
i42
9t6
!l48
1)52
953
955
HI
2tl
411
451:
511
511
5tY
511
54G
54M
58F
581
59C
59K
611
611
68&
88ft
SSP
96A
9liB
I
FREE STlUIDlNG OPTIOru:
floor tolerlng . tarpel ( lnclodeS Front I Rear F\OOr Mats )
Ucwt Plate Rracllel ( FrClnt )
Ilear Door locks IlIlIndles 1B0peraliYe
Wmae Prep Pada2e . GliI1e Lamp, SiIeI and Spealler WIring
Wll'int Prep Pada2e - Born I Siren
Silicone loses wi A1Iaillt Oamps
Uteral Row ReinIorcellleDt
Root W'1fiJlg ( IDle ill (wier 0I1ool ), Im:ludes lateral low Reinlorcement
Boot W'mg (lIO JloIe In Roo( )
leyed me - ley (Ode 1284X
leyed Mile - ley (ede t294X
leyedllike. ley (ode ot35X
leYed me -ley (Ode 1-&351
leyed Alike -ley (Odc G51lJl
leyed Mile -Icy (ode 11511
tom1esy lamps Bisablel1
Speed toIltr&l
TJact10a COOtroI (A.YaIlablt w 17m &: 1501 )
WlletI toYers. fUll .01/1'1/1501" nel) ~J.]
2-Way ladio Prewe il'f~1
~~,
Belli W'lIlt1OY 111 POlltt Delete (leal swildtes ollly, operallle 1r0llllroo.I dt1~4Z
Two-lolle Paint #1
Two-Tone Paint #2
Tl'o-lOlle Painl #3
TnIIll pntlT" 1I/1eY1ilr IfoJd UIIel
SUn: i-WIJ hwtt DriYtt Seat
Fl2U1e Ilotlleattl' . ~
Umited Slip Iilltteldial (tpl.1~ &: 151.\ I UtI 01 736A & TIOA) _.t...~,::_:....,
lpollalllp, JlriYu'S Side; 6" hi1J #225 '1/160,000 CP,A-Pil1lIrMolUlled t~
w~ - Spollamll Prep (DrlYer's Side Only)
SJIOlLamtJ, Dnal Stde; Ii" IB\tJ #225 wi 169,001 lP,l-Pil1Ir MoOled
WIrtDt - SllOllamP Prep (Dual Side)
I.&tllDt Gas tap
lamp, Dome Map ( 5" telder MOIIIl ) Jelefe
ItADIO: AM/FM Stereo
IADIO: IlCdlonic AM I 1M FIll I.ogit Stereo ...1 t:auette Player
Power ldjllUable Pedals (Brllle aDd lttelalor )
'ilIe Air l\ats - DrlYer & FrOD! Pa~
DeclDd Release on Door and IoslI1Ullenl Panel -ltUifioll PO'lered
leated Mlrron
I.amiDaled SetlllilJ Side GIm
SUn: 00111 Budets I OOUlllear ~I 'II HanUal DriVer Passen.,6er
SElTS: 0011I SpIil BeDell I Oolll Rear ( Some ieslrktiollS I Some GpliOllS NIl )
Mol~, Fro,t BotIJUde, CoJor-leyed-lNSTAllEII
Moldinl!S, Front Bodyside, Mor-leYed. mllrull.lJ, SDlPPED IN TIM t~fi
mn: Ootll front Butlels I ViUJllear Seal
\(11;
;~~i~;
~IE
t.{~i
.~~:
i~]
&~
I
f~
:<"pn_...:
tit;!
Page 2 of 4
1012112004
LAKEWOOO FORDLANO, INC.
Don Stafford, Fleet Manager
(3031 %32.2200 en. 13&2
tH.OO
'.00
2UO
lUG
31.00
295.00
'16.00
181.00
79.00
.(0.0.
,(6."
40."
.(6.0.
46."
46.01
19."
20Ut
211.f1t
33.~
42...
25."
"11.M
'(11.ot
m.ot
172."
351."
32."
tRot
172...
M."
322.01
174.01
10."
U.
!It.ot
2b9.00
114.00
211.00
5'1.0'