Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Agenda Packet 07-10-17 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING July 10, 2017 7:00 p.m. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Sara Spaulding, Public Information Officer, at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS APPROVAL OF Council Minutes of June 12, 2017 and Study Notes of June 19, 2017 PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES First Opportunity for Public Input on the 2018 Budget CITIZENS’ RIGHT TO SPEAK a. Citizens, who wish, may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of 3 minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster. b. Citizens who wish to speak on Agenda Items, please sign the GENERAL AGENDA ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is called to be heard. c. Citizens who wish to speak on Study Session Agenda Items, please sign the STUDY SESSION AGENDA ROSTER. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA a) Motion to approve the purchase of snow and ice control equipment from Auto Truck Group of Colorado Springs, Co, in an amount not to exceed $98,708 b) Motion to award a contract for Bus Shelter and bus bench cleaning, and snow and refuse removal services to United Facilities Solutions of Littleton, Co, in an amount not to exceed $40,000 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: July 10, 2017 Page -2- PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 2. Council Bill 10-2017 – approving the rezoning of property located at 6610 West 31st Avenue from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C) (Case No. WZ-17- 02/Gustafson) 3. Council Bill 11-2017 – approving the rezoning of property located at 6375 West 44th Avenue from Commercial-One (C-1) to mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) (Case No. WZ-17-04/Conway) 4. Council Bill 12-2017 – reappointing Presiding Municipal Judge Christopher Randall, increasing his hourly compensation and approving a Presiding Municipal Judge Services Agreement 5. Council Bill 13-2017 – approving a Lease with Verizon Wireless for placement of a Cellular Antenna Facility on the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center 6. Council Bill 14-2017 – amending Sections 16-81 and 16-84 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws to legalize gravity knives and switchblades, consistent with State Law DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS 7. Resolution No. 25-2017 – adopting the City of Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS ADJOURNMENT ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: FIRST OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC INPUT ON THE 2018 BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (10/17/2016) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (10/24/2016) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ _______________________________ Administrative Services Director City Manager ISSUE: The process for the development of the 2018 budget is underway. An important phase of this process is offering the public opportunities to provide input to City Council prior to the presentation of the 2018 proposed budget. This public input opportunity at this meeting is the first of two; the second opportunity for public input will be during the regular City Council meeting on Monday, August 14, 2017. PRIOR ACTION: No prior action was necessary on this item. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial impact on this item. BACKGROUND: Each year, the City invites the public to provide input on the budget prior to the budget being presented to City Council. This community engagement practice is in line with best practices used by local governments across the country and endorsed by the Government Finance Officers’ Association (GFOA). Staff includes a summary of all feedback received from these public input meetings in the presentation of the proposed budget to City Council. First Public Input Opportunity on the 2018 Budget July 10, 2017 Page 2 The 2018 Budget is scheduled to be presented to the Mayor and City Council on Monday, September 18, 2017. Following review and direction from City Council, the City will hold a public hearing on the proposed 2018 Budget on Monday, September 25, 2017. The 2018 Budget is scheduled for adoption on Monday, October 9, 2017. The proposed budget will be available online on the City website prior to the September 18th meeting. The public is invited to provide input on the proposed 2018 Budget at the September 18th and 25th meetings. RECOMMENDATIONS: No recommendation on this item is necessary. RECOMMENDED MOTION: No formal action by City Council is necessary at this time. REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Heather Geyer, Administrative Services Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE THE PURCHASE OF SNOW AND ICE CONTROL EQUIPMENT FROM AUTO TRUCK GROUP OF COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $98,708 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Public Works Director City Manager ISSUE: The Public Works Department is proposing the purchase of various snow and ice control equipment, including a dump body, lighting, hydraulics and other options to be installed on the new tandem cab and chassis plow truck purchased earlier this year. The total expense of the various equipment, lighting, hydraulics and options is not to exceed $98,708. . PRIOR ACTION: Purchase of a new plow truck cab and chassis was approved by the City Council on January 23, 2017. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The funds for the purchase of this equipment are budgeted in the 2017 Public Works Department General Fund budget, account number 01-303-800-807, Fleet Replacement. The total approved budgeted amount for this account is $547,000, and the proposed equipment purchase was originally budgeted within that amount. BACKGROUND: After contacting the available tandem snow and ice control equipment upfit dealers in the Denver area, it was determined the City would best be served by using the National Joint Powers Alliance (NJPA) contract, as proposed by Auto Truck Group. NJPA is a cooperative purchasing group Council Action Form – Snow Plow Equipment Upfit July 10, 2017 Page 2 which performs national research that allows the City to attain equipment in accordance with bid/purchasing requirements. By using NJPA contract #080114-HPI, the appropriate equipment, lighting, hydraulics and options to upfit the new International tandem cab and chassis, can be provided by Auto Truck Group, an authorized dealer located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The existing, obsolete equipment will be sent to auction. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends using the NJPA contract to purchase the necessary equipment, lighting and hydraulics to properly upfit the new International tandem cab and chassis. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve the purchase of snow and ice control equipment from Auto Truck Group of Colorado Springs, CO, in an amount not to exceed $98,708.” Or, “I move to postpone indefinitely the approval of the purchase of snow and ice control equipment from Auto Truck Group of Colorado Springs, CO, for the following reason(s): _____________” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Greg Knudson, Operations Manager Scott Brink, Public Works Director Jennifer Nellis, Purchasing Agent Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Auto Truck Quote #77309 per NJPA Contract #080114-HPI ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO AWARD A CONTRACT FOR BUS SHELTER AND BUS BENCH CLEANING, AND SNOW AND REFUSE REMOVAL SERVICES TO UNITED FACILITIES SOLUTIONS OF LITTLETON, COLORADO, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $40,000 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Public Works Director City Manager ISSUE: The Public Works Department is requesting approval of a contract for bus shelter and bus bench cleaning and snow and refuse removal services within the City at pre-determined sites. Based upon bid requirements and performance, staff recommends award to United Facilities Solutions, LLC, of Littleton, Colorado in an amount not to exceed $40,000. PRIOR ACTION: Council awarded a contract for bus shelter cleaning and snow removal services to Front Range Services in 2012, following a formal solicitation process. The contract included four additional one-year contract renewal periods, subject to City review and approval. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The funds for these services are budgeted in the 2017 Public Works Department General Fund Budget, account number 01-303-700-704, Contractual Services. The budget amount for these services in 2017 is $40,000. Council Action Form – Bus Shelter Cleaning July 10, 2017 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The City recently conducted a competitive, formal solicitation RFB-17-18 for Bus Shelter Cleaning and Snow Removal Services and Bus Bench Cleaning and Refuse Removal Services. The term for these services is one year, with the option to renew with this vendor for up to four additional one-year periods, subject to their performance, and approval of the annual itemized budget. Four proposals were received for these specialized services in response to the solicitation. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon proposed pricing, and qualifications to perform the required services, staff recommends award to United Facilities Solutions, LLC, of Littleton, Colorado. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to award a contract for bus shelter and bus bench cleaning, and snow and refuse removal services to United Facilities Solutions, LLC, of Littleton, Colorado in an amount not to exceed $40,000.” Or, “I move to deny awarding a contract for bus shelter and bus bench cleaning, and snow and refuse removal services to United Facilities Solutions, LLC, of Littleton, Colorado in an amount not to exceed $40,000. for the following reason(s): _______________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Greg Knudson, Operations Manager Scott Brink, Director of Public Works Jennifer Nellis, Purchasing Agent Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Bid Tabulation Sheet PROJECT: RFB-17-18 �� • City of _?WheatRL,dge REQUESTED BY: GREG KNUDSON, PUBLIC WORKS -OPERATIONS BUS SHELTER CLEANING & SNOW REMOVAL SERVICES & BUS BENCH CLEANING & TRA�O I OPENED BY: JENNIFER NELLIS, PURCHASING AGENT DUE DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, JUNE 20, 2016 BY 1 P.M. LOCAL TIME � ITNESSED BY: CINDY RAIOLO, PURCHASING TECHNICIAN Carnation Building City Block Solutions, United Facilities Front Range VENDOR Services. Inc. LLC Solutions, LLC Services, Inc. LOCATION Denver, CO Denver, CO Littleton, CO Commerce City, CO , .. , , .. BIDDER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FORM Yes Yes Yes Yes ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDA (0) Yes Yes Yes Yes ILLEGAL ALIEN COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes NON-DISCRIMINATION ASSURANCE FORM Yes Yes Yes Yes NON-COLLUSION AFFADAVIT Yes Yes Yes Yes VENDOR QUALIFICATION FORM Yes Yes Yes Yes ATTACHMENT C -PRICE PAGE Yes Yes Yes Yes UNIT PRICE -ONE BUS SHELTER LOCATION PER WK $10.33 $5.85 $8.75 $14.50 UNIT PRICE -SNOW REMOVAL 1 SHELTER LOCATION $15.50 $8.35 $10.00 $14.50 UNIT PRICE -BUS BENCH ONCE PER WEEK $10.33 $4.80 $4.80 $14.50 UNIT PRICE -REFUSE COLLECTION ONCE EVERY WK $5.17 $7.30 $4.80 $14.50 page 1 of 1 Attachment 1 ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 10-2017 – AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6610 WEST 31ST AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) TO RESIDENTIAL-ONE C (R-1C) (CASE NO. WZ-17- 02/GUSTAFSON) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (6/12/2017) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (7/10/2017) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ _____________________________________ Community Development Director City Manager ISSUE: The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C) for property located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue. The proposed rezoning area includes one parcel, the total size of which is approximately a third of an acre. The current R-2 zoning allows for a duplex, but the smaller minimum lot size established by the proposed R-1C zoning will allow the property to be subdivided into two parcels. The subdivision and rezoning will allow for the construction of two homes. PRIOR ACTION: Planning Commission heard the request at a public hearing on May 18, 2017 and recommended approval. The staff report and meeting minutes from the Planning Commission meeting are attached. Council Action Form – Gustafson Rezoning July 10, 2017 Page 2 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed zone change is not expected to have a direct financial impact on the City. Fees in the amount of $871 were collected for the review and processing of Case No. WZ-17-02. BACKGROUND: The property is located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue in the southeast quadrant of the City. The property is currently zoned Residential-Two (R-2) which primarily allows single-family homes and duplexes depending on the lot size. Because the property is 15,760 square feet in size, it would meet the minimum requirements to allow either a single-family home or a duplex. Currently, only a foundation exists on the subject property, but originally, this property was the site of a church, which was built in 1920. The applicants purchased the property in 2016 with the intention of renovating the church structure and adding a second story in order to utilize it as their home. The applicants obtained all appropriate building permits, but when they began renovations, the existing structure turned out to be less structurally sound than it had appeared, and they were forced to tear it down. Due to the increased costs now associated with the project, the property owners contemplated constructing a duplex on the R-2 zoned property in order to sell an additional unit. Under current zoning a duplex would be allowed on the property, as it has adequate lot frontage and size. However, the owners felt a duplex is inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood and felt that two single-family homes better fit the character of the predominately single-family neighborhood. Surrounding Land Uses The property is currently zoned Residential-Two (R-2), as is much of the surrounding neighborhood to the west and north. To the east and southeast is a variety of single-family zone districts, including Residential-One (R-1), Residential-One A (R-1A), and Residential-One C (R- 1C), all of which are single-family zone districts. The majority of surrounding land use is single-family, with the exception of a church located east of the subject property across Newland Street. Current and Proposed Zoning The proposed zone district, R-1C, allows for smaller single-family home lots than the current R-2 does, however R-1C disallows duplexes. While R-2 is the predominant zoning in the area, single-family homes are the predominant land use, so the zone change and resulting development would be more in line with the character of the neighborhood despite having a slightly smaller lot size. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Council Bill No. 10-2017, an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C), on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication for the following reasons: 1. City Council has conducted a proper public hearing that meets all public notice requirements as required by Section 26-109 of the Code of Laws. Council Action Form – Gustafson Rezoning July 10, 2017 Page 3 2. The requested rezoning has been reviewed by the Planning Commission, which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The requested rezoning has been found to comply with the criteria for review in Section 26-112.E. of the Code of Laws.” Or, “I move to deny Council Bill No. 10-2017, an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C), on second reading for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. ” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Zack Wallace Mendez, Planner II Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill No. 10-2017 2. Planning Commission staff report with attachments 3. Planning Commission hearing minutes ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HOPPE COUNCIL BILL NO. 10 ORDINANCE NO. _________ Series of 2017 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6610 WEST 31ST AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) TO RESIDENTIAL-ONE C (R-1C) (CASE NO. WZ-17-02 / GUSTAFSON) WHEREAS, Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws establishes procedures for the City’s review and approval of requests for land use cases; and, WHEREAS, Brenden Gustafson has submitted a land use application for approval of a zone change to the Residential-One C (R-1C) zone district for property located at 6610 West 31st Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a comprehensive plan— Envision Wheat Ridge—which supports opportunities for home ownership and encourages investment in established neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 2017 and voted to recommend approval of rezoning the property to Residential-One C (R-1C) , NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Upon application by Brenden Gustafson for approval of a zone change ordinance from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C) for property located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue, and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change is approved for the following described land: LOT 21, HALLER SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability; Conflicting Ordinance Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of the ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 12th day of June, 2017, ordered it published with Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for Monday, July 10, 2017 at 7 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of _____ to _____, this _____ day of ___________, 2017. SIGNED by the Mayor on this _______ day of _______________, 2017. ______________________________________ Joyce Jay, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Approved as to Form _______________________________________ Gerald Dahl, City Attorney 1st publication: June 15, 2017 2nd publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript: Effective Date: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Zack Wallace Mendez DATE OF MEETING: May 18, 2017 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-17-02 / Gustafson ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6610 W. 31st Avenue PROPERTY OWNER: 6610 31st Ave, LLC APPROXIMATE AREA: 0.362 acres (15,762 square feet) PRESENT ZONING: Residential-Two (R-2) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS ZONING ORDINANCE DIGITAL PRESENTATION VICINITY MAP Attachment 2 Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 2 All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The owners of 6610 W. 31st Avenue have submitted this application requesting approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C) on their property. The zone change is the first step of the process for approval for the property to be utilized for two single-family homes. The applicant is concurrently under review for a two-lot subdivision on this property. The goal of the zone change and subdivision is to create a buildable parcel for a single-family home on the west half of the lot, while maintaining the east side of the lot to rebuild a home on an existing foundation. (Exhibit 1, Applicant Letter) The two-lot subdivision is a related case, but does not require any public hearings. The plat is being reviewed by Staff, and is being designed to meet the lot width and lot size requirements of the R-1C zone district. Specific development standards, such as setbacks and lot coverage would be reviewed during the building permit process, during which time the structures would also be reviewed to ensure compliance with existing building codes. No action will be taken on the subdivision pending City Council review and approval of this rezoning ordinance. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY The subject property is located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue. The property is approximately 0.362 acres in size located at the southwest corner of Newland Street and 31st Avenue. Currently there is a concrete foundation oriented towards Newland Street on the east side of the property. The applicants purchased the property in November 2016 with the intention of renovating the church building that once stood on the site and adding a second story in order to make the property their home. The applicants obtained all appropriate building permits, but when they began renovations on the existing structure, the structure turned out to be less structurally sound than it had appeared, and they were forced to tear it down. Due to the increased costs now associated with the project, the property owners contemplated constructing a duplex on the R-2 property in order to sell an additional unit. Under the current zoning a duplex would be allowed on the property, as it has adequate lot frontage and size. The owners felt a duplex, however, was inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood and felt that two single-family homes better fit the character of the predominately single-family neighborhood (Exhibit 2, Aerial Photo). The property is currently zoned Residential-Two (R-2) as is much of the surrounding neighborhood to the west and north. To the east and southeast is a variety of single-family zone districts, including Residential-One (R-1), Residential-One A (R-1A), and Residential-One C (R- 1C), all of which are single-family zone districts (Exhibit 3, Zoning Map). The majority of surrounding land use is single-family, with the exception of a church located east of the subject property across Newland Street. Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 3 III. PROPOSED ZONING The applicants are requesting the property be rezoned to Residential-One C (R-1C), a zone district intended to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable medium-density single-family residential neighborhoods. In addition to small lot single-family homes, the zone district permits churches, schools, government buildings, and group homes. Most uses other than single-family homes require special use permits and larger lot sizes. The property is currently zoned Residential-Two (R-2). This zone district is intended to provide high-quality, safe, quiet and stable low to moderate-density residential neighborhoods. This zone district allows single-family homes and duplexes, in addition to churches, schools, government buildings, and group homes. Similar to the aforementioned R-1C zone district, most uses other than single-family homes and duplexes require special use permits. The applicants are requesting the zone change to R-1C so they can subdivide the property and build two single-family homes rather than a duplex, which is currently allowed on the subject property. While R-2 is the predominant zoning in the area, single-family homes are the predominant land use, so the zone change and resulting development would be more in line with the character of the neighborhood despite having a slightly smaller lot size. The following table compares the existing and proposed zoning for the property, with standards for new development or major additions. The development standards are largely the same with two exceptions: the front and rear setbacks are reduced by five feet, and more notably, the recently adopted bulk plane regulations (Ordinance 1613) would apply to the proposed R-1C zoning but would not apply to the current R-2 zoning. The bulk plane regulations in particularly may result in a more contextually appropriate development than would otherwise be allowed in R-2. Development Standard CURRENT ZONING Residential-Two (R-2) PROPOSED ZONING Residential-One C (R-1C) Uses Allows for single family homes and duplexes. Also allows for churches, schools, and government buildings. Allows for single-family homes. Also allows for churches, schools, and government buildings. Architectural Standards None None Max. Building Height 35’ 35’ plus bulk plane regulations Max. Lot coverage 40% 40% Setbacks Front / street facing Rear setback Side setbacks 25’ 10’ 5’ (5’ per story for duplex) 20’ 5’ 5’ Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 4 IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-112.E. The Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. The zone change will not result in adverse effects on the surrounding area. The rezoning would allow for the same number of units as are currently allowed, though in single-family form rather than a duplex. Staff expects no significant adverse effects on the surrounding area. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property. In the event that the current utility capacity is not adequate, the property owner/developer will be responsible for utility upgrades. A building permit will be required for any construction on the property, and fire and building codes are required to be met. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 3. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one (1) of the following conditions exists: a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. Envision Wheat Ridge, the City’s comprehensive plan, identifies this area as a Neighborhood (Exhibit 4, Comprehensive Plan Map). This designation identifies areas where people own homes and thrive and where residents of all ages can live safely and comfortably. Defining characteristics of an established neighborhood in the comprehensive plan are: consistent character, mature landscaping, high rates of reinvestment and home ownership, consistent maintenance, and high desirability. City goals that are met with the rezoning proposal include encouraging reinvestment in a property, maintaining consistent character, and creating opportunities for home ownership. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 5 b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is in error. Staff has not found any evidence of an error with the current R-2 zoning designation as it appears on the City zoning maps. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing character of the area. Staff finds no evidence of significant changes in the area. The zone change request from R-2 to R-1C neither responds to nor results in notable change of character. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan. The proposed rezoning does not relate to an unanticipated community need. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request. V. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING / PUBLIC NOTICING Prior to submittal of an application for a zone change, the applicant is required to hold a neighborhood input meeting in accordance with the requirements of section 26-109. A meeting for neighborhood input was held on March 21, 2017. There were several attendees from the neighborhood at the meeting. A full summary of the meeting is provided in Exhibit 6, Neighborhood Meeting. During the public noticing period, Staff received three letters, all of which are in support of the rezoning application (Exhibit 7, Comments Received). VI. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and regarding the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow: Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 6 Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: No objection to the proposed zoning application. Each single-family home is required to have a separate sanitary sewer service line and connection to the district main. Appropriate tap fees will apply. Consolidated Mutual Water District: No objection to the proposed zoning application. New applications for water service should be completed anytime there is a change in use. A remodel or building addition is considered a change in use. Each separate structure must be served by a separate tap and meter. West Metro Fire Protection District: No objection to the proposed zoning application. Century Link (Engineering): No objection to the proposed zoning application. Century Link (ROW): No objection to the proposed zoning application. Xcel Energy: No objection to the proposed zoning application. Wheat Ridge Public Works: No objection to the proposed zoning application. VII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the proposed zone change promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. Staff further concludes that the proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Because the zone change evaluation criteria support the zone change request, staff recommends approval of Case No. WZ-17-04. VIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS Option A: “I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-17-04, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C) for property located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 3. The zone change will provide additional opportunity for reinvestment in the area. 4. The zone change will result in single-family development, which is consistent with the predominant land use in the area. 5. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request.” Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 7 Option B: “I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-17-04, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-1C) for property located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. 2. …” Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 8 [see attached] EXHIBIT 1: APPLICANT LETTER Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 9 Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 10 Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 11 Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 12 EXHIBIT 2: AERIAL Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 13 EXHIBIT 3: ZONING MAP Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 14 EXHIBIT 4: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 15 EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS View of the subject property looking west from Newland Street. The existing foundation is visible. View of the subject property looking southeast from 31st Avenue near the western property line. Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 16 View of the subject property from Newland Street looking northwest. Panorama of the property frontage along Newland Street. Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 17 Meeting Date: March 21, 2017 Attending Staff: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Scott Cutler, Planning Technician Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building Lobby Conference Room 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO Property Address: 6610 W. 31st Avenue Property Owner(s): Brendan and Kimiko Gustafson Property Owner(s) Present? Yes Applicant: Same as Property Owner Applicant Present? Yes Existing Zoning: Residential-Two (R-2) Existing Comp. Plan: Neighborhood Existing Site Conditions: The subject property is located at 6610 W. 31st Avenue in the southeast quadrant of the City. The site is zoned Residential-Two (R-2) and is generally surrounded by residential uses. R-2 is intended to establish high quality, safe, and stable low to moderate-density residential neighborhoods. It requires a minimum lot size of 9,000 sq ft for single-family dwellings and 12,500 sq ft for duplexes. The only exception is a property to the east across Newland, which has historically functioned as a church. That church is zoned Residential-One (R-1), but all other properties immediately surrounding the site are zoned R-2. The property is at the southwest corner of 31st and Newland Street. It has a frontage of approximately 146 feet on W. 31st Avenue and 110 feet on Newland. Based on Jefferson County records, the subject property has a total area of about 15,700 square feet. Previously, an 1100-square foot structure was located on the property and was used as a church. It was recently removed after it was determined to be structurally unsound, but the foundation remains intact. Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: EXHIBIT 6: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 18 Original proposal: The applicants purchased the property with the intent of rehabilitating and expanding the existing structure to convert it to a single family home. The applicants worked with a design team, submitted a permit application, and were issued a building permit by the City on January 27, 2017. The scope of work included interior demolition; an additional 1000 square feet of living area; new siding; updated electrical, plumbing and HVAC; new framing on the main floor; and new kitchen, bathrooms, and windows. The work was valued at over $220,000. Upon receiving the permit and commencing demolition, it became apparent that the existing structure was beyond repair, and existing walls essentially collapsed requiring the applicants to abandon their plans for an addition. In an effort to identify alternative development scenarios for the property, the applicants proposed several different platting and zone change options. Updated Proposal: The applicants have decided to pursue a zone change to Residential-One B (R-1B) from R-2. Due to the demolition issues, the intent is to use the original foundation as a footprint for a new home, expanding to make room for a two-car garage. The applicants stated their desire for two single-family homes instead of building a duplex, which would not be allowed under R-2 zoning, but would be under R-1B if a zone change was successful. Subsequent to rezoning the property, a subdivision plat would be required to divide the property into two lots would require a variance to the minimum lot width standard for the 80’ required lot width for a corner lot. The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting: • In addition to the applicant and staff, seven members of the public attended the neighborhood meeting: Edwin Rossillon, Joyce Gallo, I. Gallo, Mike Lantry, Barbara Lantry, Randy Steinheimer, and Warren Hughes. • All of the members of the public reside in the 600 foot radius from the project site • Staff discussed the site, its zoning potential, future land use, and the surrounding neighborhood • The applicant and members of the public were informed of the process for the proposed rezone and subdivision process. • The members of the public were informed of their opportunity to make comments during the process and at the public hearing, if required. The following issues were discussed regarding the rezone request and proposed development: • Will the second home be a rental property or are there plans to sell the home? It is likely not a good investment to build a new home on an expensive lot and turn it into a rental property. (The applicants mentioned they do own two rental properties but that this site would not be appropriate for a rental) • What is the house going to look like? Many residents expressed concerns about the architecture of the house and how it would fit in with the neighborhood. Material quality also Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 19 was mentioned to be important factor in support. The proposed design is contemporary, but largely within the footprint of the original church on the property. If successful in getting a rezone, the other home would also have a contemporary style. The intent is not to create an “ultra-modern” style, but one that attempts to respect the neighbors while still being contemporary. Staff added that single-family homes are not subject to an architectural review. • Is there a builder lined up for the project? Was there a permit? There is no builder lined up; material quality is important. Yes, there was a permit for the work on the church. • Will there be a fence on the property line? Yes, and the applicant will consult with the direct neighbor to the west about the design of the fence. • Does splitting an existing lot affect property values? Property values will likely increase due to the new investment (the current site is dilapidated and unused). Smaller lots than surrounding not likely to affect property values. One resident commented that they have split a lot before and it increased their property values, and that these lots are still relatively large compared to Denver and other suburbs. • Why is the applicant an LLC? They don’t want liability, but are not intending to “flip” the property. • Will there be a fence on the property line? Yes, and the applicant will consult with the direct neighbor about the design of the fence. Aside from the seven neighbors at the meeting, staff received no comment from others in the area regarding the proposal. Overall, the look and material of the proposed home(s) were the largest concerns. Subdividing/rezoning the lot was not met with major criticism, and some neighbors were supportive. Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 20 Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 21 EXHIBIT 7: COMMENTS RECEIVED Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 22 Planning Commission WZ-17-02 / Gustafson 23 ��'� .... _ ., City of • . r\VheatRi9ge PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting May 18, 2017 1.CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair OHM at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2.ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Commission Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Alan Bucknam Dirk Boden Emery Dorsey Donna Kimsey Janet Leo Scott Ohm Amanda Weaver Vivian Vos Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Zack Wallace Mendez, Planner II Mark Westberg, Engineering Projects Supervisor Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary 3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner DORSEY to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried 8-0. 5.APPROVAL OF MINUTES -May 4, 2017 It was moved by Commissioner WEA VER and seconded by CommissionerKIMSEY to approve the minutes of May 4, 2017, as written. Motion carried 8-0. 6.PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) Planning Commission Minutes May 18, 2017 - 1 - Attachment 3 Commissioner BUCKNAM wanted clarification about the 45-foot ROW on Tabor Street and if it includes the 11 Yz-foot ROW that's dedicated by this plat or is the 11 1/2-feet being dedicated in addition to the 45-foot ROW, making the narrowest part of ROW on Tabor Street 56-feet. Ms. Reckert said it is in addition to the 45-foot ROW. Commissioner BUCKNAM also asked what the timeline is for extending 51 st Avenue ROW to Swadley Street. Ms. Reckert explained it is the responsibility of the developer for the section between Taft and Tabor when the property develops. As other properties develop to the west, those developers will be responsible for their piece of 51 st Ave. Mr. Westberg added that 515t will stop at Tabor Street, not Swadley Street. Commissioner WEA VER clarified that the next step in this case will go to City Council and a site plan will need to be reviewed. She wondered if people want more information on the traffic where can they find this. Ms. Reckert says the case file can be reviewed at the City Offices. The next piece of the plat will show lot layouts and that will be a good time for the community to give comments. It was moved by Commissioner LEO and seconded by Commissioner KIMSEY to APPROVE Case No. MS-17-08, a request for approval of a two­ lot subdivision plat for property generally addressed as 11818 W. 52°d Avenue, for the following reasons: 1.All requirements of the subdivision regulations have been met.2.The proposed plat will facilitate redevelopment of the site consistentwith the zone change and Concept Plan.3.Utility districts can serve the property with improvements installed atthe developer's expense. 4.The criteria used to evaluate a ROW vacation supports the request. Motion carried 8-0. Commissioner BODEN asked for a 5-minute recess. B.Case No. WZ-17-02: An applications filed by Brendan Gustafson, for approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-lC) located at 6610 West 31st Avenue. Mr. Wallace Mendez gave a short presentation regarding the zone change and the application. He entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet Planning Commission Minutes May 18, 2017 -4- materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. He stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Mr. Wallace Mendez handed out a letter received anonymously by the City and entered it into the record. Commissioner BODEN asked if the property falls short of 3151 A venue or does it extend all the way to 31st A venue. Mr. Wallace Mendez explained that some of what appears to be the property on the aerial image is dedicated ROW and that is why the property line does not extend all the way to the street. Commissioner BODEN also asked what district the new Bulk Plane Ordinance applies to. Mr. Wallace Mendez informed the Commission that the Bulk Plane applies to Residential-One C (R-lC) and single-family homes in Residential-3 (R-3). Commissioner BUCKNAM asked if the subdivision that will be reviewed administratively will run north to south or east to west. Mr. Wallace Mendez stated the subdivision will run north to south so there will be an east and west property. Commissioner VOS asked if the current foundation and the home on the new property will follow the R-lC setbacks. Mr. Wallace Mendez confirmed the subdivision will be in compliance with the R-1 C development standards. Commissioner LEO asked if the R-2 zone district allows group homes and daycares of a certain size if it is a private home, so that is not going to make a difference in the zone change. Mr. Wallace Mendez confirmed that accessory uses such as group homes and day cares are allowed in all zone districts, and that many of these uses require a large amount of land area and/or special use permits. He also stated that in the R-1 C, after the proposed subdivision, accessory uses will be more limited than they are currently for this property because there will not be adequate land size on either property. The only use that will be allowed would be a group home for children, but it will require a special use permit. Commissioner LEO wanted clarification that the anonymous letter received was stating the opposite of reality. Mr. Wallace Mendez stated that is correct. Planning Commission Minutes May 18,2017 -5- Commissioner OHM asked if there will be a variance required with the R-lC. Mr. Wallace Mendez stated no variance will be required. Commissioner OHM asked what the minimum lot width is for R-2 and for R-IC. Mr. Wallace Mendez clarified that the minimum lot width in the R-2 zone district is 75-feet and in the R-lC is 50 feet, but for a comer lot in both zone districts the minimum width is 80 feet. He explained that the minimum lot widths for the proposed R-1 C properties will be met. Kimiko and Brendan Gustafson, Applicant 6803 West 32°d Avenue, Wheat Ridge Ms. Gustafson explained that her family has been a part of the Wheat Ridge Community since 1978. Right now she and her husband live in the same house her grandmother did, but it is a duplex, and she would like to live in a single family home on not as busy of a street. Mr. Gustafson thanked the Commission for listening to their story and would like them to consider this zone change so they can develop two houses on the property that the neighborhood can be proud of. Bill Tanner 6705 West 3pt Avenue Mr. Tanner stated he misunderstood the zone change being proposed and what the uses could be in the R-1 C zone district. He stated he would like to see this family move into the neighborhood and build two houses on the property. For this reason, he is changing his opposition to supportive. Jane Jones 6417 West 29th Avenue Ms. Jones stated she loves this community and was afraid the rezone was going to be commercial and would like to see the zone change be to Residential-One. She wanted to clarify there will not be three houses on this property. Commissioner OHM and Mr. Wallace Mendez explained that only two homes will be allowed on this property and the allowed accessory uses are miriimal. Joe Drew 6660 West 29th Avenue Mr. Drew stated he thinks the zone change is a favorable option for this property. Planning Commission Minutes May 18, 2017 -6- Michael Corey 6417 West 29th Avenue Mr. Corey said he will be happy to finally see someone paying taxes on this property. It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner WEA VER to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-17-04, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-lC) for property located at 6610 West 3pt Avenue, for the following reasons: 1.The zone change will result in single-family development, which is consistent with the predominant land use in the area. 2.The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, orwelfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 3.The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan.4.The zone change will provide additional opportunity for reinvestmentin the area. 5.The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request. Motion carried 8-0. Commissioner OHM thanked staff for this case not requiring a variance. C.Case No. WZ-17-04: An application filed by Ryan and Lisa Conway for approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU­ N) located at 6375 West 44th Avenue. Mr. Wallace Mendez gave a short presentation regarding the zone change and theapplication. He entered into the record the contents of the case file, packetmaterials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. Hestated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore thePlanning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Commissioner BODEN asked if the zone change takes place does staff see anyconflict with behavior that can be suitable for someone's backyard, but not suitable for the park due there not being fences. Mr. Wallace Mendez agreed that situations can arise, but owner has the option tofence the property with a 6-foot fence. Ryan and Lisa Conway Planning Commission Minutes May 18, 2017 -7- ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 11-2017 – AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6375 WEST 44TH AVENUE FROM COMMERCIAL-ONE (C-1) TO MIXED USE-NEIGHBORHOOD (MU-N) (CASE NO. WZ-17- 04/CONWAY) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (6/12/2017) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (7/10/2017) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ _____________________________________ Community Development Director City Manager ISSUE: The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) for property located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue. The proposed rezoning area includes one parcel, the total size of which is approximately a quarter of an acre. The purpose of the zone change is to allow the property to be utilized solely as a residential use in the immediate future, and have the possibility of being utilized as a live/work space in the future. At this time, the applicant is not proposing any new development or modifications to the site. If the property is redeveloped in the future under the proposed MU-N zoning, an administrative site plan review would be required to confirm that proposed development meets the standards of the mixed use zone district. Council Action Form – Conway Rezoning July 10, 2017 Page 2 PRIOR ACTION: Planning Commission heard the request at a public hearing on May 18, 2017 and recommended approval. The staff report and meeting minutes from the Planning Commission meeting are attached. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed zone change is not expected to have a direct financial impact on the City. Fees in the amount of $862 were collected for the review and processing of Case No. WZ-17-04. BACKGROUND: The property is located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue in the northeast quadrant of the City, immediately west of Hopper Hollow Park. The property is currently zoned Commercial-One (C-1) which allows a wide range of commercial uses, such as office, general business, retail sales, and service establishments, which are oriented towards the community or entire region. The primary structure on the property was originally built in 1942 and has served a variety of purposes over the years, though it appears to have originally been constructed as a home and converted to a commercial structure. Based on the City’s business license and building permit records, the property was most recently used as a church, engineering office, adult daycare facility, and retail store. Surrounding Land Uses The site is zoned Commercial-One (C-1), and surrounding properties include a variety of zoning designations and land uses. To the north of the subject property is an area of residentially zoned properties, mostly Residential-Three (R-3), with some Residential-Two (R-2) in the periphery. The associated land uses to the northwest coincide with the zoning with several multi-family residential buildings. To the south of the property, along 44th Avenue, are properties zoned Restricted Commercial (RC) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Most of these properties were originally constructed as single-family homes in the 1950s, and have since been converted to small commercial offices. That being said, a residential presence still remains along 44th Avenue, with residences located to the southeast and southwest of the subject property. To the west of the subject property is a mix of commercial zoning designations, both Commercial-One (C-1) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC), with small-scale commercial land uses. Immediately adjacent to the subject property to the west is a property zoned Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N). This property was rezoned from Restricted Commercial (RC) to MU-N in 2014 in anticipation of utilizing the site as a mixed residential and commercial (live/work) property. To the east of the property is the City of Wheat Ridge’s Hopper Hollow Park, which was constructed in 2015, and has mixed zoning: Commercial-One (C-1) nearest 44th Avenue and a mix of Residential-Three (R-3) and Residential-Two (R-2) further north. Current and Proposed Zoning The proposed zone district, MU-N, is a less intensive commercial zone district because it limits or disallows several of the larger scale and auto-oriented uses which are permitted in current C-1 Council Action Form – Conway Rezoning July 10, 2017 Page 3 zoning. A significant difference between the C-1 and MU-N zone district is in the treatment of residential uses. In the C-1 zone district, residential uses are permitted on a very limited basis per section 26-626 of the city code. Existing residential uses may continue, but new residential uses must be accessory to a commercial use. Because the subject property was previously converted entirely to a commercial use, it cannot be converted back to a primary residential use under the current C-1 zoning. Unlike in Commercial-One, a new residence is a permitted use in the Mixed Use-Neighborhood zone district. The zone change would allow the current owners and applicants to make this property and existing structure their home, while also allowing the option of one day moving their small business to operate from the property. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Council Bill No. 11-2017, an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N), on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication for the following reasons: 1. City Council has conducted a proper public hearing that meets all public notice requirements as required by Section 26-109 of the Code of Laws. 2. The requested rezoning has been reviewed by the Planning Commission, which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The requested rezoning has been found to comply with the criteria for review in Section 26-112.E. of the Code of Laws.” Or, “I move to deny Council Bill No. 11-2017, an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N), on second reading for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. ” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Zack Wallace Mendez, Planner II Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill No. 11-2017 2. Planning Commission staff report with attachments 3. Planning Commission hearing minutes CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DAVIS COUNCIL BILL NO. 11 ORDINANCE NO. _________ Series of 2017 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6375 WEST 44TH AVENUE FROM COMMERCIAL-ONE (C-1) TO MIXED USE-NEIGHBORHOOD (MU-N) (CASE NO. WZ-17-04 / CONWAY) WHEREAS, Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws establishes procedures for the City’s review and approval of requests for land use cases; and, WHEREAS, Ryan and Lisa Conway have submitted a land use application for approval of a zone change to the Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) zone district for property located at 6375 West 44th Avenue; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a comprehensive plan— Envision Wheat Ridge—which calls for a mix of land uses along W. 44th Avenue by virtue of it being designated a neighborhood commercial corridor; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 18, 2017, and voted to recommend approval of rezoning the property to Mixed-Use-Neighborhood (MU-N). NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Upon application by Ryan and Lisa Conway for approval of a zone change ordinance from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) for property located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue, and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change is approved for the following described land: LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRAUER SUBDIVISION, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of Attachment 1 health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability; Conflicting Ordinance Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of the ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 12th day of June, 2017, ordered it published with Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for Monday, July 10, 2017 at 7:00 o’clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of _____ to _____, this _____ day of ___________, 2017. SIGNED by the Mayor on this _______ day of _______________, 2017. ______________________________________ Joyce Jay, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Approved as to Form _______________________________________ Gerald Dahl, City Attorney 1st publication: June 15, 2017 2nd publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript: Effective Date: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Zack Wallace Mendez DATE OF MEETING: May 18, 2017 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-17-04 / Conway ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 6375 W. 44th Avenue PROPERTY OWNER: Ryan and Lisa Conway APPROXIMATE AREA: 0.295 acres (12,832 square feet) PRESENT ZONING: Commercial-One (C-1) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood Commercial Corridor ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS ZONING ORDINANCE DIGITAL PRESENTATION VICINITY MAP Attachment 2 Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 2 All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I.REQUESTThe owners of 6375 W. 44th Avenue have submitted this application requesting approval of azone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) on the property. The zone change is the first step of the approval process for the existing structure on the property to be used residentially. If approved, the owners have stated they intend to make modifications tothe interior of the structure in order to meet existing building codes for a dwelling unit. Theyhave also contemplated adding a commercial component to the structure to utilize the structureas a live/work space (Exhibit 1, Applicant Letter). The zone change will allow the property to be used for residential or commercial uses, as well as a mix (live/work or mixed use) of residential and commercial uses. If the rezoning is approved, building permits will be necessary for anyconversion of use. Building permits are reviewed by the Planning Division and Public WorksDepartment as needed to ensure compliance with City standards. II.EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY The subject property is located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue. The property is approximately 0.295 acres in size and located on the north side of 44th Avenue, immediately adjacent to Hopper Hollow Park (Exhibit 2, Aerial Photo). Currently the property contains one structure that has a footprint of approximately 700 square feet. The structure was originally constructed in 1942 and has served a variety of uses over the years. It appears to have originally been constructed as a home. Based on the City’s business license and building permit records, the property was most recently used as a church, engineering office, adult daycare facility, and retail store. The site is zoned Commercial-One (C-1), and surrounding properties include a variety of zoning designations and land uses. To the north of the subject property is an area of residentially zoned properties, mostly Residential-Three (R-3), with some Residential-Two (R-2) in the periphery. The associated land uses to the northwest coincide with the zoning with several multi-family residential buildings. To the south of the property, along 44th Avenue, are properties zoned Restricted Commercial (RC) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC). Most of these properties were originally constructed as single-family homes in the 1950s, and have since been converted to small commercial offices. That being said, a residential presence still remains along 44th Avenue, with residences located to the southeast and southwest of the subject property. To the west of the subject property is a mix of commercial zoning designations, both Commercial-One (C-1) and Neighborhood Commercial (NC), with small scale commercial land uses. Immediately adjacent to the subject property to the west is a property zoned Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N). This property was rezoned from Restricted Commercial (RC) to MU-N in 2014 in anticipation of utilizing the site as a mixed residential and commercial (live/work) property. To the east of the property is the City of Wheat Ridge’s Hopper Hollow Park, which was constructed in 2015, and has mixed zoning, Commercial-One (C-1) nearest 44th Avenue and a mix of Residential-Three (R-3) and Residential-Two (R-2) further north (Exhibit 3, Zoning Map). Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 3 III. PROPOSED ZONING The applicants are requesting the property be rezoned to Mixed Use-Neighborhood, a zone district intended to provide medium density mixed use development. In addition to residential and office uses, it allows for a range of neighborhood serving commercial and retail uses. The property is currently zoned Commercial-One (C-1). This zone district was established to accommodate a wide range of commercial uses, such as office, general business, retail sales, and service establishments, which are oriented towards the community or entire region. The applicant intends to utilize the property solely as a home or as a live/work space in the future. If the rezoning is approved, the conversion of the structure into a residential use, in whole or part, will require building permits and inspections through the Building Division to ensure compliance with city codes, the International Building Code, and the International Fire Code. The following table compares the existing and proposed zoning for the property, with standards for new development or major additions. In terms of permitted uses, MU-N is a less intensive commercial zone district because it limits or disallows several of the larger scale and auto-oriented uses which are permitted in C-1. In terms of residential uses, MU-N is more flexible because the C-1 zone district would not otherwise allow the property to convert to a residential use. The applicants are not currently proposing to redevelop the property, but if development were to occur in the future, the design standards are comparable under both zone districts. CURRENT ZONING Commercial-One (C-1) PROPOSED ZONING Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) Uses Allows a wide range of commercial uses including office, general business, retail sales, and service establishments Allows new residential, commercial or mixed use – includes multi-family and live/work facilities, excludes outdoor storage Architectural Standards Traditional Overlay ASDM standards apply, including high quality architecture: standards related to articulation, variation, materials, transparency Mixed-Use standards apply, including high quality architecture: standards related to articulation, variation, materials, transparency Max. Building Height 50’ 35’ if the building has residential use, 50’ for all other uses Max. Lot coverage 80% 90% for mixed use 85% for single use Min. Landscaping 20% 10% for mixed use 15% for single use Build-to Area 0-12’ along front property line 0-12’ along front property line Setbacks North: 10’ plus 5’ per story East / West: 0’ if nonflammable or 5’ per story North: 5’ East / West: 0’ Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 4 IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-112.E. The Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. The change of zone will not result in adverse effects on the surrounding area. The rezoning would limit the range of commercial uses allowed on the site to more neighborhood oriented commercial activities, as opposed to the potential for more intensive commercial activities which are permitted under C-1. While the MU-N zone district will expand use options by allowing for residential uses, these are generally considered to be less intensive than commercial uses. Based on the existing character and land use patterns on 44th Avenue, MU-N is a more appropriate zone district than C-1 in terms of land use and intensity. For that reason, the zone change should not have an adverse effect on the surrounding area. The MU-N zoning is expected to add value to the subject property and also to the surrounding community. The mixed use development standards will support compatibility between future redevelopment and existing land uses. The subject site serves as a transition between commercial activity and the park, so the residential uses that MU-N would allow would be an appropriate transitional use. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. Adequate infrastructure currently serves the property, and no new development is proposed at this time. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property. In the event that the current utility capacity is not adequate for a future use, the property owner/developer would be responsible for utility upgrades. A building permit will be required for modifications made to the structure to ensure compliance with the Building Code, as well as the Fire Code. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 3. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one (1) of the following conditions exists: a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 5 West 44th Avenue is a primary east-west thoroughfare in the City which is classified as a minor arterial and is predominantly commercial in character. Envision Wheat Ridge, the City’s 2009 comprehensive plan, identifies the corridor as a Neighborhood Commercial Corridor. This designation envisions a corridor with a broad mix of activities, including small-scale, pedestrian friendly mixed-use retail, commercial businesses, and residential, with a focus on promoting a compatible mix of uses to supply the daily services and needs of adjacent residential areas. A stated goal in the comprehensive plan is to promote reinvestment in property and to promote a mix of neighborhood supporting uses, including residential use and office use. This zone change request supports the comprehensive plan by enabling investment in the property and by aligning the zoning with the City’s mixed use goals. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is in error. Staff has not found any evidence of an error with the current C-1 zoning designation as it appears on the City zoning maps. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing character of the area. Staff finds no evidence of significant changes in the area. The zone change request from C-1 to MU-N neither responds to nor results in notable change of character. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan. The proposed rezoning does not relate to an unanticipated need. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request. V. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Prior to submittal of an application for a zone change, the applicant is required to hold a neighborhood input meeting in accordance with the requirements of section 26-109. Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 6 A meeting for neighborhood input was held on April 4, 2017. Four people from the neighborhood attended the meeting. In general attendees supported the request. Some concerns were raised and those are expressed in the meeting summary (Exhibit 6, Neighborhood Meeting Notes) VI. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and regarding the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow: Wheat Ridge Public Works Department: No comments. Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: No objections. West Metro Fire Protection District: No comments or concerns. Xcel Energy: No objection. Century Link: No objection. VII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the proposed zone change promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. Staff further concludes that utility infrastructure adequately serves the property, and the applicant will be responsible for upgrades, if needed in the future. Finally, Staff concludes that the zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan by promoting a mix of uses along a neighborhood commercial corridor. Because the zone change evaluation criteria support the zone change request, staff recommends approval of Case No. WZ-17-04. VIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS Option A: “I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-17-04, a request for approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) for property located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. Utility infrastructure adequately services the property. 3. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the character of 44th Avenue. Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 7 4. The zone change will provide additional opportunity for reinvestment in the area. 5. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request.” Option B: “I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-17-04, a request for approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) for property located at 6375 W. 44th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. 2. …” Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 8 EXHIBIT 1: APPLICANT LETTER Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 9 EXHIBIT 2: AERIAL Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 10 EXHIBIT 3: ZONING MAP Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 11 EXHIBIT 4: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 12 EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS View of the existing structure on the subject property. This photo was taken looking west along the 44th Avenue sidewalk along the eastern property line. View of the subject property looking west from Hopper Hollow Park—the park is in the foreground. Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 13 View of the subject property looking east from the adjacent property frontage. View of the property looking south from inside Hopper Hollow Park. The existing structure is visible behind the tree and white truck. The split rail fence in the foreground is within the park, and no divisional fence separates the park and subject property. Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 14 Meeting Date: April 4, 2017 Attending Staff: Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge City Hall – 7500 W. 29th Avenue Property Address: 6375 West 44th Avenue Property Owner(s): Lisa and Ryan Conway Property Owner(s) Present? Yes Applicant: Lisa and Ryan Conway Applicant Present? Yes Existing Zoning: Commercial-One (C-1) Existing Comp. Plan: Neighborhood Commercial Corridor Existing Site Conditions: The property is located at 6409 West 44th Avenue in the northeast quadrant of the City. The site is zoned Commercial-One (C-1) and is surrounded by a mix of residential and commercial uses. Properties to the west are zoned Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU-N) and Neighborhood-Commercial (N-C), and properties to the southwest are zoned N-C and Restricted-Commercial (R-C). To the east and north is a property with split zoning that is City-owned and was developed last year into Hopper Hollow Park. Based on Jefferson County records, the subject property has a total area of 12,832 square feet and is part of the Brauer Subdivision. The structure on the building was originally constructed in 1942 and has a footprint of approximately 700 square feet. Based on the City’s business license and building permit records, the property was most recently used as a church, engineering office, adult daycare facility, and retail store. Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: The applicant is proposing to rezone the property from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use- Neighborhood (MU-N). The purpose of the rezone is to expand possible uses for the property, including the potential for a live/work scenario. EXHIBIT 6: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 15 The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting: • In addition to the applicant and staff, four members of the public attended the neighborhood meeting including Jennifer Hayden, Leonard Shields, Tyson Martens, and Mary Kay Massey. • Not all attendees provided their addresses, but all indicated they are property owners in the area. • Staff discussed the site, its zoning, and the comprehensive plan designation of 44th Avenue. • Staff explained the difference between the C-1 and the MU-N zone districts in terms of permitted uses and development standards. • The applicant and members of the public were informed of the process for a zone change. • The members of the public were informed of their opportunity to make comments during the process and at the public hearing. The following issues were discussed regarding the zone change request: • In general, attendees were interested in understanding why the zone change was desired, if there would be redevelopment, why the applicants want to live in this location, and what the applicant’s long-term plans are for the property. Two attendees were supportive of the request. Two attendees expressed distrust of the applicant’s intentions, expressed concern that 44th Avenue would become overdeveloped, and expressed concern regarding multi-story infill development that was occurring in East Wheat Ridge. • An attendee expressed concern that the City does not have a view shed ordinance, and staff explained the content and applicability of the recently approved bulk plane ordinance. • What are the applicant’s plans for the property? The applicant intends to live on the property and possibly to use the property for a live/work arrangement. One of the owners is a hair stylist and it may be possible or desirable to work out of the home. • Why did the applicant’s close on the property if the current zoning doesn’t match their intended residential use? There was a misunderstanding regarding the current zoning and permitted uses given that the property was originally constructed as a house. • Does the applicant plan to develop the property? The applicant is not currently planning to change the footprint of the structure, but plans to remodel the interior. • Does the applicant own or intend to own adjacent properties (to consolidate for redevelopment)? No, the applicant does not own or intend to own or consolidate adjacent properties for development. • Why does the applicant want to live on 44th Avenue? The applicants have a family and enjoy being next to the park. Real estate prices in Denver, Wheat Ridge and the metro area are making home ownership more difficult to achieve, and the property was in their preferred location and price range. • Will marijuana-related uses be proposed or permitted? No, marijuana-related uses are not only not permitted in the MU-N zone district, but they are also not permitted within this proximity of a public park. • Will multifamily development, group homes or homeless shelters be permitted? Planning Commission WZ-17-04 / Conway 16 Multifamily development is permitted in MU-N. Group homes are permitted in C-1 and MU-N zone districts. Homeless shelters are not listed in the City’s use charts. The size of the property would be a limiting factor for any of these uses because the site would need to accommodate parking, drainage, setback and open space requirements. • Can the property be rezoned to a residential-only zone district? Based on the City’s comprehensive plan and the “Neighborhood Commercial Corridor” designation of W. 44th Avenue, it would probably not be appropriate to rezone the property to a residential zone district. • What is the maximum building height and how does it compare to other zone districts? In C-1 the maximum building height is 50 feet. In MU-N the maximum height for non- residential uses is 50 feet, but the maximum height for a structure with a residential use is 35 consistent with the other residential zone districts in the City. Aside from the four neighbors at the meeting, staff received one inquiry from someone who could not attend the meeting. When the proposal was explained there were no concerns expressed. ��'� .... _ ., City of • . r\VheatRi9ge PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting May 18, 2017 1.CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair OHM at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2.ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Commission Members Absent: Staff Members Present: Alan Bucknam Dirk Boden Emery Dorsey Donna Kimsey Janet Leo Scott Ohm Amanda Weaver Vivian Vos Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Zack Wallace Mendez, Planner II Mark Westberg, Engineering Projects Supervisor Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary 3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4.APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner DORSEY to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried 8-0. 5.APPROVAL OF MINUTES -May 4, 2017 It was moved by Commissioner WEA VER and seconded by CommissionerKIMSEY to approve the minutes of May 4, 2017, as written. Motion carried 8-0. 6.PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) Planning Commission Minutes May 18, 2017 - 1 - Attachment 3 Michael Corey 6417 West 29th Avenue Mr. Corey said he will be happy to finally see someone paying taxes on this property. It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner WEA VER to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-17-04, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential-Two (R-2) to Residential-One C (R-lC) for property located at 6610 West 3pt Avenue, for the following reasons: 1.The zone change will result in single-family development, which is consistent with the predominant land use in the area. 2.The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, orwelfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 3.The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan.4.The zone change will provide additional opportunity for reinvestmentin the area. 5.The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request. Motion carried 8-0. Commissioner OHM thanked staff for this case not requiring a variance. C.Case No. WZ-17-04: An application filed by Ryan and Lisa Conway for approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Neighborhood (MU­ N) located at 6375 West 44th Avenue. Mr. Wallace Mendez gave a short presentation regarding the zone change and theapplication. He entered into the record the contents of the case file, packetmaterials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. Hestated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore thePlanning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Commissioner BODEN asked if the zone change takes place does staff see anyconflict with behavior that can be suitable for someone's backyard, but not suitable for the park due there not being fences. Mr. Wallace Mendez agreed that situations can arise, but owner has the option tofence the property with a 6-foot fence. Ryan and Lisa Conway Planning Commission Minutes May 18, 2017 -7- 3156 West 381h Avenue No additional Comments. It was moved by Commissioner WEA VER and seconded by Commissioner KIMSEY to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-17-04, a request for approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use­Neighborhood (MU-N) for property located at 6375 West 44th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1.The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area.2.Utility infrastructure adequately services the property. 3.The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives ofthe City's Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the character of44th Avenue.4.The zone change will provide additional opportunity for reinvestment in the area.5.The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request. Motion carried 8-0. 8.OTHER ITEMS 9.ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner KIMSEY and seconded by CommissionerBUCKNAM to adjourn the meeting at 8:33 p.m. Motion carried 8-0. Planning Commission Minutes May 18, 2017 --r= � T;mmy OdeaJ,Recording -8- ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NUMBER 12-2017 - AN ORDINANCE REAPPOINTING PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE CHRISTOPHER RANDALL, INCREASING HIS HOURLY COMPENSATION AND APPROVING A PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE SERVICES AGREEMENT PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (06/26/2017) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (07/10/2017) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ City Attorney City Manager ISSUE: The City’s Home Rule Charter provides for appointment of the Municipal Court Judge for a term of two years. The current term of Presiding Judge Christopher Randall expires July 1, 2017. PRIOR ACTION: The Judge was reappointed in June 2015. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Judge is presently compensated at $96.09 per hour. This rate has been in effect since 2015. The Judge requested an increase to $98.97 per hour. This change is reflected in the attached Agreement. BACKGROUND: The Judge has provided a memorandum (attached) requesting reappointment and an increase in hourly compensation. Council Action Form – Reappointment of Municipal Judge July 10, 2017 Page 2 RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Council Bill No. 12-2017, an ordinance reappointing presiding Municipal Judge Christopher Randall, increasing his hourly compensation and approving a presiding municipal judge services agreement, on second reading, order it published and take effect upon adoption.” Or "I move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill 12-2017, an ordinance reappointing presiding Municipal Judge Christopher Randall, increasing his hourly compensation and approving a presiding municipal judge services agreement for the following reason(s) ________________." REPORT PREPARED BY: Gerald Dahl, City Attorney Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill 12-2017 2. Municipal Judge Services Agreement 3. Judge’s letter to Council (with 4 Attachments) 4. Comparative Salary Spreadsheet CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER HOPPE COUNCIL BILL NO. 12 ORDINANCE NO. ________ Series of 2017 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE REAPPOINTING PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE CHRISTOPHER RANDALL, INCREASING HIS COMPENSATION AND APPROVING A PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE SERVICES AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the current presiding municipal judge, Christopher Randall was reappointed effective July 1, 2015 for a two-year term expiring on July 1, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Judge has continued to serve since that date; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Charter Section 8.3, the City Council shall appoint all judges for a term of two years; and WHEREAS, Judge Randall has requested reappointment at the end of his current term, as well as an increase in his hourly rate in the Presiding Municipal Judge Services Agreement ; and WHEREAS, the Council wishes to reappoint Judge Randall, and to approve an increase in his compensation and other changes to the Agreement; and WHEREAS, Charter Section 8.5 requires the Council to set the Judge’s compensation by ordinance. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Pursuant to Sections 8.3 and 8.5 of the Home Rule Charter, Presiding Municipal Judge Christopher Randall is hereby reappointed for a term of two years, expiring on July 1, 2019. The Presiding Judge’s compensation shall be $98.97 per hour. The terms and conditions of the Presiding Judge’s appointment shall be as set forth in the Presiding Municipal Judge Services Agreement, effective as of July 1, 2017, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Severability; Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Attachment 1 Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption at second reading, as permitted by the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 6 to 0 on this 26th day of June, 2017, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for July 10, 2017, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of ______ to _______, this ___day of _________, 2017. SIGNED by the Mayor on this ________ day of _________, 2017. Joyce Jay, Mayor ATTEST: Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Approved As To Form Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney First Publication: June 29, 2017 Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: Attachment 2 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE SERVICES AGREEMENT is entered into and effective as of the 1st day of July 2017 ("Effective Date"), by and between the CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO (the “City”) and CHRISTOPHER D. RANDALL, (“Presiding Judge”), together referred to herein as the "Parties." In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 – SERVICES Pursuant to Chapter VIII of the Wheat Ridge Home Rule Charter (the "Charter"), Presiding Judge shall have the following duties: A. Ensure the presence of a municipal judge at all Wheat Ridge Municipal Court ("Municipal Court") cases, by either presiding over such cases personally or by scheduling an Associate Judge to hear such case(s) and by establishing an on-call municipal judge schedule; B. Formulate and amend the local rules of the Municipal Court with the approval of the Colorado Supreme Court; C. Supervise the Associate Judges, if any, and all Municipal Court personnel; serve as Department Head for the Municipal Court staff; attend Department Director meetings, in person or by designee, and meetings with the City Manager, City Attorney and City Council as needed; and D. Responsible for preparation of annual department budget, monitoring of operational expenses and overall delivery of court services. ARTICLE 2 – QUALIFICATIONS The Presiding Judge shall continuously maintain the following qualifications: A. Licensed to practice law in all Colorado courts, including the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado; and B. Resident within 40 miles of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Court. ARTICLE 3 - TERM; TERMINATION Pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Charter, this Agreement shall be for a two (2) year term, ending on July 1, 2019. This Agreement may be terminated during its term for any of the reasons enumerated in Section 8.3 of the Charter. ARTICLE 4 – COMPENSATION, PERFORMANCE The Parties agree that Presiding Judge shall be compensated at $98.97 per hour for services rendered under this Agreement. Presiding Judge may also be compensated for reimbursable expenses properly invoiced to the City as set forth below. For purposes of this Agreement, "reimbursable expenses" shall mean those expenses directly incurred by Presiding WR MuniCourt/MuniJudgeContract - Randall -2- Judge in the performance of his duties under this Agreement, including mileage and travel expense. Presiding Judge shall be paid via the current City system for recording and compensating hourly employees. A. Funding. This Agreement is specifically subject to the provisions of Section 2-3(c) of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which limits the amount for which the City shall be liable to the amount expressly appropriated by the City Council, either through budgeted appropriation, or contract or bid appointment. The Parties further recognize and agree that the City, as a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, is subject to the Constitution and laws of the State of Colorado. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the obligation of the City to make payment to Presiding Judge is expressly subject to annual appropriations by the City of funds for the next ensuing budget year. B. Performance Pursuant to Section 8.3 of the Home Rule Charter, Presiding Judge is appointed for a two year term. In contrast to other employees of the City, the Judge’s compensation is set by the Council by ordinance, rather than through the annual performance review process for other city employees. Also, the Presiding Judge is not an at-will employee as all other city employees are. In recognition of these distinctions, the parties agree that the Council functions as the performance review body for the Presiding Judge, exercising that authority by ordinance as required by the Charter. ARTICLE 5 – INDEMNIFICATION, INSURANCE AND BENEFITS • Pursuant to the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, §§ 24-10-101 et seq., C.R.S., Presiding Judge is an appointed official of the City entitled to any and all benefits of law pertaining to judicial or sovereign immunity and to coverage by the City's insurance applicable to persons holding such a position for claims brought against him in his official capacity or arising out of his performance of his official duties as described. Presiding Judge shall be eligible to participate in the following insurance and benefit programs available to City employees, at a level equal to the average number of hours of work per week performed by the Presiding Judge, which for purposes of this Agreement, the Parties agree shall be a minimum of thirty (30) hours per week: • short term disability; long term disability; • worker’s compensation; • group term life insurance; • employee assistance plan; • retirement plan; WR MuniCourt/MuniJudgeContract - Randall -3- • official holidays (6 hours of holiday pay per holiday recognizing ten (10) holidays per year per Section 5-1 of the City’s Personnel Policies); • personal time off (PTO) leave accrued per pay period dependent upon the number of hours of work per week and longevity in the position, all as governed by Section 5.6 of the City’s Personnel Policies; • extended sick leave; • jury duty pay; employee • recreation program benefit; • Kaiser Permanente HMO; Delta Dental; RPS section 125 cafeteria plan; and Eye- Med vision. The City agrees to pay the applicable premium for the rate level, consistent with the City insurance plan as amended from time to time. • As a department head, Presiding Judge receives an annual $600 allowance for cellular telephone. For all such insurance and benefit programs, to the extent the programs or any of their features are altered, amended or eliminated with respect to all eligible City employees, such alteration, amendment or elimination shall also apply to Presiding Judge in the same manner. WR MuniCourt/MuniJudgeContract - Randall -4- ARTICLE 6 – CHARTER, LAWS AND ORDINANCES Presiding Judge shall at all times during the performance of this Agreement, strictly adhere to all applicable federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances that affect or govern the work as herein contemplated. ARTICLE 7 – EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Presiding Judge shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Presiding Judge shall adhere to acceptable affirmative action guidelines in selecting employees and shall ensure that employees are treated equally during employment, without regard to their age, race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. ARTICLE 8 – JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE An independent, fair and impartial judiciary is indispensable to our system of justice. The United States legal system is based upon the principle that an independent, impartial, and competent judiciary, composed of men and women of integrity, will interpret and apply the law that governs our society. Thus, the judiciary plays a vital role in preserving the principles of justice and the rule of law. Judges, individually and collectively, must respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to maintain and enhance confidence in the legal system. Presiding Judge is expected to uphold these principles. ARTICLE 9 – JUDICIAL IMPARTIALITY Presiding Judge shall uphold and apply the law, and shall perform all duties of judicial office impartially. Impartially means absence of bias or prejudice in favor of, or against, particular parties or classes of parties, as well as maintenance of an open mind in considering issues that may come before the judge. Presiding Judge shall perform the duties of the judicial office, including administrative duties, without bias or prejudice. Presiding Judge shall not be swayed by public clamor or fear of criticism. Presiding Judge shall not permit social, political, financial, or other interests or relationships to influence the judge’s judicial conduct or judgment. Presiding Judge shall not convey or permit others to convey the impression that any person is able to influence the judge. ARTICLE 10 - EX PARTE COMMUNICATION Presiding Judge shall not initiate, permit or consider ex parte communications, or consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers, concerning pending or impending matters. ARTICLE 11 – LAW AND VENUE The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern as to the interpretation, validity, and effect of this Agreement. The Parties agree that venue and jurisdiction for disputes regarding any aspect of this Agreement is proper and exclusive with the District Court of Jefferson County, Colorado. WR MuniCourt/MuniJudgeContract - Randall -5- ARTICLE 12 – NOTICES Any notice required or permitted by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been sufficiently given for all purposes if sent by certified mail or registered mail, postage and fees prepaid, addressed to the party to whom such notice is to be given at the address set forth below. Such notice shall be deemed to have been given when deposited in the United States Mail. If to the City: City Manager 7500 W 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Fax: (303) 234-5924 With a copy to: City Attorney 7500 W 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Fax: (303) 234-5924 If to Presiding Judge: Christopher D. Randall, Esq. 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Fax (303) 980-1721 ARTICLE 13 – ASSIGNMENT AND SUBCONTRACTORS The duties and obligations of Presiding Judge may not be assigned, delegated, or subcontracted except with the express written consent of the City. ARTICLE 11 – SEVERABILITY To the extent that the Agreement may be executed and performance of the obligations of the Parties may be accomplished within the intent of the Agreement, the terms of this Agreement are severable, and should any term or provision hereof be declared invalid or become inoperative for any reason, such invalidity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other term or provision hereof. The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, or the same term upon subsequent breach. ARTICLE 12 – INTEGRATION OF UNDERSTANDINGS This Agreement is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the Parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force and effect whatsoever, unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent novation, renewal, addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in writing and signed by Presiding Judge and an authorized representative of the City. ARTICLE 13 – AMENDMENTS The City may, from time to time, require changes in the scope of services of the Presiding Judge to be performed herein. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in WR MuniCourt/MuniJudgeContract - Randall -6- the amount of the Judge’s compensation, must be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Presiding Judge, as an amendment to this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement in two (2) copies, each of which shall be deemed an original, as of the day and year first written above. ATTEST: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO ________________________________ By: ____________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Joyce Jay, Mayor Seal APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney PRESIDING JUDGE Christopher D. Randall City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2835 F: 303.235.2829 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us May 25, 2017 Honorable Joyce Jay, Mayor Members of the Wheat Ridge City Council City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th St. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Mayor Jay and Members of City Council: The City Charter creates a municipal court and directs the city council to appoint a presiding judge. The Charter requires that all municipal judges have been on the bench or have practiced law for a period of years. I have thirty-one (31) years in the practice of law and twenty-five (25) years on the bench of which fifteen has been as the presiding judge in Wheat Ridge. The Charter states that Council shall appoint a presiding judge for a term of two (2) years. By charter, the duties of the judge are to supervise court personnel and submit a yearly budget. In practice, the Colorado Supreme Court establishes the judge’s mandate: that is, to justly determine all municipal ordinance violations, ensure criminal law procedures, administer cases fairly, and follow city, state, and federal laws and constitutions. Although not part of the Supreme Court’s mandate, a presiding judge should seek to reduce risk for the City. Finally, over the past two years there has been an explosion of legislation directed at municipal courts. As a result, the presiding judge reviews and incorporates new legislation into the operation of the court. The Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct (Code) guides judicial ethics and requires independence, impartiality, competence, and integrity of any judge. Inherent in the Code is the precept that judges must respect and honor the judicial office as a public trust and strive to maintain and enhance confidence in the legal system. I began as Presiding Judge in Wheat Ridge in January 2002, pursuant to a formal services agreement and have been the Presiding Judge continuously for fifteen (15) years. Each services agreement is for a two-year term. My most recent two-year contract for services began July 2015, and ends June 2017. I am requesting renewal of the contract. Please see the enclosed attachments for information about court, accomplishments, projects, and goals. Attachment 3 I am also requesting a salary increase. The City adopted a pay for performance program for employees in 2013, and most city employees and all court staff received raises in 2017. Although the pay for performance program does not apply to my position, its precepts are aspirational. Since I assess team members annually, I am aware of the program’s standards and ratings. I have not received an increase for two (2) years. Based on the court’s proficiency and performance I am requesting a 3% increase to $98.97 an hour. Please see the enclosed attachments for accomplishments and projects. Year to date, I am working an average of thirty-two (32) hours per week. Regular court sessions take about twenty-four (24) hours a week. Most court days take ten-plus hours to complete. Preparation for jury trials and the jury trials add a few days per year. Other work hours are related to new legislation, extended court sessions, managerial duties, director obligations, legal research, administrative matters, budget, personnel (including recruitment and interviewing), and meetings. Currently, the court administrator and I are perfecting the new payroll system called TimeClock. This is an dynamic City with an interesting court docket. I enjoy the challenge and energy of the City and the court. I look forward to another two years to continue to provide service. Sincerely yours, Christopher D. Randall Presiding Judge Wheat Ridge Municipal Court Attachments: 1. Court Goals and Mission, 2017 2. Municipal Court Projects, 2017 3. Purposes of a City Criminal Code 4. Criminal Sentencing Factors Considered ATTACHMENT 1 WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL COURT COURT GOALS AND MISSION 2017 1. Provide efficient and professional service to customers. Assist customers to the extent permitted by ethical rules law. 2. Treat each customer equally regardless of gender, race, nationality, economic circumstances, or cultural background. 3. Provide a safe environment for employees and customers. 4. Attract, reward, compensate and retain exceptional employees. 5. Develop ways and means to provide services more effectively and efficiently. 6. Use various measurement tools as a process of evaluation to align customer service expectations to available personnel and fiscal resources. 7. Develop a customer service action plan. 8. Increase customer’s access to information regarding court services through maintenance and improvement of the court web site. 9. Develop strategies, programs, and sentences that mitigate crime, rehabilitate offenders, reduce traffic violations, and influence code issues. 10. Seek to upgrade old technologies and equipment within budgetary limits. 11. Remodel the courtroom and clerk’s office to increase security, improve customer service, and improve team member efficiency. ATTACHMENT 2 MUNICIPAL COURT PROJECTS 2017 Christopher Randall – Presiding Judge Kersten Armstrong – Court Administrator Mary McKenna – Deputy Court Administrator 1. Assist court team members to develop professionally a. Cross-training, goal setting, court mission development, staff education, conferences, seminars b. Monthly court staff meetings 2. Court entryway remodel to accommodate security equipment and provide meeting space for attorneys, witnesses, and staff 3. Court clerk window remodel to allow full time staffing at window(s) to improve customer service and staff efficiency 4. Staff development a. Collections investigator reclassification – completed b. Recruit Deputy Court Clerk II c. Recruit Court Marshal d. Recruit Deputy Court Clerk I e. Five year staffing plan f. Department and City-wide on-boarding process g. Succession planning h. Monthly staff meetings 5. Court efficiency, public relations, and customer service a. Old form amendment and new form creation b. Court procedures manual update c. On-line payments of fines and costs d. Monthly municipal judges meetings to develop best practices for municipal courts e. Flexibility with and alternative programs regarding payment of fines, restitution, and costs f. Train collections investigator g. Recognize and support victims of crimes to extent allowed by ethics and law h. Authorship of bi-annual Nuts and Bolts booklet for municipal judges 6. Legislative mandates a. Automatic appointment of attorneys for in-custody detainees (legislature postponed until Summer 2018) b. Added due process procedures for non-payment of monetary amounts c. Accelerated bond hearing times and personal recognizance bond requirements for persons in-custody d. Proliferation of various due process requirements e. Municipal court records sealing and expungement ATTACHMENT 2 f. Driving under revocation traffic infraction for municipal court (if approved by City Council) g. Amendment to texting while driving traffic infraction h. Expanded arraignment requirements i. Removal of certain weapons from illegal weapon list 7. Work with City Attorney to decriminalization certain ordinances and to permit penalty assessments for others 8. Work with police department and emergent JeffComm Dispatch to allow for court access to probable cause affidavits and arrest warrants 9. Time Clock payroll training 10. Priority Base Budgeting amendments 11. Work with the Colorado Municipal League to craft legislation 12. Engage in a best practices committee to educate advocacy groups and the Colorado Municipal League 13. Budget supplementation and amendment 14. Write articles for Mayor’s Matters newsletter ATTACHMENT 3 PURPOSES OF A CITY CRIMINAL CODE The Court is to construe the criminal City Code in such manner as to promote fulfillment of its general purposes, namely: 1. To define offenses. 2. To give warning of the prohibited conduct. 3. To give warning of the penalties authorized upon conviction. 4. To forbid the commission of offenses. 5. To prevent their occurrence through the deterrent influence of a sentence. 6. To provide for punishment. 7. To prevent crime. 8. To promote acceptance of responsibility and accountability by offenders. 9. To consider restitution to crime victim to make them whole. 10. To provide safety and security for victims and the public. State and Federal case law and §§ 18-1-102 & 102.5 (C.R.S. 2016) ATTACHMENT 4 CRIMINAL SENTENCING FACTORS CONSIDERATIONS By Christopher D. Randall Concepts from State and Federal case law, City Ordinances, §§ 18-1-102 & 102.5 C.R.S., and 18 U.S.C. § 3553 Sentencing is an art and varies from case to case. Pursuant to common sense, state statutes, and federal statutes, sentences should be sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with the purposes of sentencing. The court should be able to state the reasons on the record (in court) for imposing a sentence. Some of the principles and purposes of sentencing are as follows: Restoration for victim (reimbursement for pecuniary/financial loss; restitution). Victim must submit bills or invoices. Victim safety Protection of the public Sentencing is individualized Reduce recidivism; deter offender from repeating the same or similar conduct Deter others from engaging in criminal conduct Punishment to the offender. However, no sentence should be cruel or unusual. Sentencing should be fair and impartial Court considers the rehabilitation likelihood Ability to comply w/sentence Acceptance of accountability for actions Distinguish between serious & minor offenses; distinguish between violent crimes against persons and non-violent crimes The nature and elements of the offense; e.g. crimes of violence, bodily injury, injury to pets or livestock, loss of property The seriousness of the offense; e.g. crimes against persons involving injury versus crimes of a less significant nature The history and character of the offender ATTACHMENT 4 The criminal record of the offender Success or failure w/sentences in other cases Aggravating circumstances. Victim, police, prosecutor, or anyone else can submit evidence. Mitigating circumstances; offender and others can submit statements, documents, photographs, etc.; e.g., subsequent remedial measures, victim’s provocation, remorse, acceptance of responsibility To select a sentence, a sentence length, and level of supervision that addresses the offender’s individual characteristics and reduces the potential that the offender will engage in further criminal conduct after completing his or her sentence. Promote respect for the law. Promote responsibility Promote accountability Provide restoration and healing for community Reduce costs to society AGENCY Pop.Base Hourly Rate B o n u s Ne x t P a y Re v i e w Yr s i n J o b La s t P a y I n c . % E m p l o y e r Pa y s An n u a l Em p l o y e r Po r t i o n So c . Se c . / M e d i c a r e Me d i c a l De n t a l Vi s i o n Ot h e r B e n e f i t s Au t o o r C e l l Al l o w . PT O Va c . Si c k Ho l i d a y Ot h e r Wheat Ridge (.75 FTE ) 33,000 $96.09 -$ Jun-17 14 Jul-15 5.00%$7,495 7.65%$14,308 $434 -$ Life, STD, LTD; Rec Pass, Sect. 125, EAP, Wellness $600 100 ----------60 ----- $58 -$ ---------------------- Arvada 147,571 $70.95 $ - Jun-17 16 Jun-17 13.0%$19,214 1.45%$9,624 $783 $0 ------------------------120 3.69 per paych eck 72 24 • $700-full day; • $350-half day; • $90-2 hr minimum -$ ---------------------- Aurora 325,078 $68.27 -$ Jan-18 Va r i e s Jan-17 7.0%$9,940 7.65% $7,127 single / $13,824 EE + 1 / $16,476 family $525 $0 Life Ins, Hlth Svgs, LTD, 457, EAP ---------------- 0-2yr/ 96; 15+/18 4 104 80 24 $75.00 -$ Jan-18 Va r i e s Jan-17 Boulder 103,100 $59.40 -$ Jul-11 8 Jul-10 13.70%$16,927 7.65%$15,658 $1,260 -$ ------------------------184 112 80 24 $67.01 -$ Oct-11 9 Oct-10 13.70%NA 7.65%-$ -$ -$ ------------------------92 56 40 12 Broomfield (24 hrs wk) 66,529 $73.72 -$ NR 0 NR 6% Money Purchase Plan NA 7.65% $5,640 single/$7, 680 EE +1, $9,960 family $34.90 single -$ Life Ins, Hlth Svgs, LTD, 457, EAP ---------------- 182 hrs./5 yrs of servic e 0 0 STD, funeral $70.00 -$ 2017 - Judge Compensation ANNUAL ALLOCATION of LEAVE HOURSSALARY DATA RETIREMENT PLAN(s)EMPLOYER's ANNUAL COST for BENEFITS/PROGRAMS No Benefits (Relief Judge) No Benefits No Benefits No Benefits (Relief Judge) (Relief Judge) (Relief Judge) (Part-Time) AGENCY Pop.Base Hourly Rate B o n u s Ne x t P a y Re v i e w Yr s i n J o b La s t P a y I n c . % E m p l o y e r Pa y s An n u a l Em p l o y e r Po r t i o n So c . Se c . / M e d i c a r e Me d i c a l De n t a l Vi s i o n Ot h e r B e n e f i t s Au t o o r C e l l Al l o w . PT O Va c . Si c k Ho l i d a y Ot h e r 2017 - Judge Compensation ANNUAL ALLOCATION of LEAVE HOURSSALARY DATA RETIREMENT PLAN(s)EMPLOYER's ANNUAL COST for BENEFITS/PROGRAMS Englewood 32,491 $66.48 -$ Unknown 19 Jan-17 10%$13,828 7.65%$9,620 $750 -$ $250 Wellness $1 , 2 0 0 Te c h n o l o g y Al l o w n c e --------210 48 96 -------- Fort Collins (.8 FTE)167,500 $70.40 -$ Dec-17 28 Jan-16 13%$15,230 7.65%$10,824 $588 -$ $867 - Life & LTD ----------------240 120 72 -------- Greeley 87,596 $43.27 -$ Mar-12 1 Mar-09 6%$5,400 7.65%$1,112 $353 $15 ----------------160 ----------------80 8 Lakewood Presiding 148,300 $64.02 -$ Mar-12 3 Mar-11 10%$12,869 1.45%92.50%90%100%3% contribute to 457 plan $000 per year --------144 96 112 -------- $59.16 -$ Mar-12 21 Mar-11 10%$12,869 1.45%92.50%90%100%3% contribute to 457 plan ----------------160 144 112 -------- $70 -$ ---------------------- Longmont 90,000 $62.50 -$ Jun-18 1 na 12.00%$15,600 7.65%$11,000 $360 $30 $400- Retiree HAS ----------------96 96 80 8 No Benefits (Part-Time) Lakewood Municipal Not Applicable - No Part-Time Judges Not Applicable - No Part-Time Judges $50 per hour No Benefits (Part-Time) (Part-Time) (Part-Time) AGENCY Pop.Base Hourly Rate B o n u s Ne x t P a y Re v i e w Yr s i n J o b La s t P a y I n c . % E m p l o y e r Pa y s An n u a l Em p l o y e r Po r t i o n So c . Se c . / M e d i c a r e Me d i c a l De n t a l Vi s i o n Ot h e r B e n e f i t s Au t o o r C e l l Al l o w . PT O Va c . Si c k Ho l i d a y Ot h e r 2017 - Judge Compensation ANNUAL ALLOCATION of LEAVE HOURSSALARY DATA RETIREMENT PLAN(s)EMPLOYER's ANNUAL COST for BENEFITS/PROGRAMS Loveland 75,019 $60.10 -$ Dec-17 2 Feb-17 3%$3,750 7.65%$7,015 $275 -$ Life, LTD, STD, Wellness ----------------110 64 88 -------- $65.00 -$ ---------------------- Thornton 134,139 $69.16 3,667.00$ Aug-17 29 Dec-16 10%$14,385 7.65%$5,155 $296 $52 Life Insurance 0 --------240 96 72 16 $78 -$ Varies V a r i e s Varies Westminster 109,838 $67.31 to $72.12 -$ 10.25%$22,000 1.45%$11,797 In M e d i c a l -$ --------$6,000 214 80 10 -$ 10.25%Employee paid 1.45%$4,515 In Me d i c a l -$ ----------------190 80 10 Cities shaded in blue provided updated information for the 2017 Fiscal Year. Other cities compensation data is from 2011. City of Wheat Ridge Department Director Salary Range - $49.04 to $75.96/hour; Police Chief - $53.56 to $82.98/hour Cities shaded in lime green provided updated information after the Study Session on June 5th. ATTACHMENT 4 (Contractual- vacant at the moment) No Benefits No Benefits Associate Judge (Relief Judge) ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 13-2017 – AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A LEASE WITH VERIZON WIRELESS FOR PLACEMENT OF A CELLULAR ANTENNA FACILITY ON THE WHEAT RIDGE RECREATION CENTER PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (06/26/2017) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (07/10/2017) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ City Attorney City Manager ISSUE: Council is asked to approve a lease with Verizon Wireless for placement of a cellular antenna facility on the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center. PRIOR ACTION: The Jefferson County Open Space Committee has approved the subordination of the Jefferson County right of reverter based upon use of Open Space funds to initially acquire the Recreation Center property. The Board of County Commissioners will act on this in the near future. County staff will recommend approval, thereby clearing the necessary precondition to approve the lease. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The lease will produce revenue of $25,000 per year in the first year. BACKGROUND: The Parks and Recreation Department has been in negotiation with Verizon for several months. The term is five years, with three options to extend for five years each. The annual rental payment is $25,000 for the first year, increasing by 2% for each following year. The antenna facility will be fully contained on the roof of the building, as shown on the attached photo Council Action Form – Cell Antenna at Recreation Center July 10, 2017 Page 2 simulations. There will be an assessory concrete equipment pad (10’ x 10’) at the rear (west) side of the building. A location diagram and photo simulation are attached. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Council Bill No. 13-2017, an ordinance approving a lease with Verizon Wireless for placement of a cellular antenna facility on the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center, on second reading, and that it take effect upon adoption.” Or, “I move to deny approval of Council Bill No. 13-2017, an ordinance approving a lease with Verizon Wireless for placement of a cellular antenna facility on the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center for the following reason(s) _______________________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Gerald Dahl, City Attorney Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Ordinance 13-2017 2. Memorandum of Lease 3. Photo simulations and facility diagram CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER URBAN COUNCIL BILL NO. 13 ORDINANCE NO. _________ Series 2017 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING A LEASE WITH VERIZON WIRELESS FOR PLACEMENT OF A CELLULAR ANTENNA FACILITY ON THE WHEAT RIDGE RECREATION CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado is a Colorado home rule municipality, duly organized and existing pursuant to Section 6 of Article XX of the Colorado Constitution and governed by its elected City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has authority to approve leases for uses of City property; and WHEREAS, the Council wishes to approve a lease with Verizon Wireless for the placement of a cellular antenna facility on the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center building, subject to terms and conditions of said lease; and WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Open Space Commission and the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners have approved the subordination of the Jefferson County right of reverter based upon use of Open Space funds to initially acquire the Recreation Center property, thereby clearing the necessary precondition to approval of the lease. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Lease approved. The lease between the City of Wheat Ridge and Verizon Wireless (VAW), LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless, a memorandum of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the same, in form approved by the City Attorney. Section 2. Effective date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon adoption and signature by the Mayor, as permitted by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 6 to 0 on this 26th day of June, 2017, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge, and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for July 10, 2017 at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of ___ to ___, this _____ day of ______________, 2017. Attachment 1 SIGNED by the Mayor on this _____ day of ____________, 2017. _________________________ Joyce Jay, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Approved as to Form _________________________ Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney First Publication: June 29, 2017 Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: Published: Wheat Ridge Transcript and www.ci.wheatridge.co.us EXHIBIT A MEMORANDUM OF LEASE DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: Sherman & Howard L.L.C. 633 17th Street, Suite 3000 Denver, Colorado 80202 Attn: Eileen Lynch Re: DEN Liam/ 309715 (Space above this line for recorder’s use) MEMORANDUM OF LAND AND ROOFTOP LEASE AGREEMENT This Memorandum of LAND AND ROOFTOP LEASE AGREEMENT is made as of the date of full execution, between the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, with its principal offices located at 7500 W. 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 hereinafter designated “Landlord” and Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless, with offices located at 180 Washington Valley Road, Bedminster, New Jersey 07921, hereinafter referred to as "Tenant." Landlord and Tenant are at times collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party." 1. Landlord and Tenant entered into a Land and Rooftop Lease Agreement (the "Agreement") on __________________________, 20__ for an initial term of five (5) years, commencing on the Commencement Date (as defined below). The Agreement shall automatically be extended for 3 additional 5-year terms unless the Tenant or the Landlord terminate it pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. 2. Landlord leased to Tenant approximately 240 square feet of ground space (the “Ground Space”) and approximately 1,325 square feet of rooftop space as shown on the site plan attached as Exhibit B (the “Rooftop Space”) of the building (the “Building”) located at 4005 Kipling Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033, the underlying real property of which is legally described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof (the Building and such real property are hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as the “Property”), for the installation, operation and maintenance of communications equipment, including Tenant’s antennas; together with such additional space on the Building and on the roof of the Building as reasonably necessary for the installation, operation and maintenance of wires, cables, conduits and pipes (the “Cabling Space”) running between and among the Ground Space and Rooftop Space and to all necessary electrical and telephone utility sources located on the Building; together with the non-exclusive right (the “Access Rights”) of ingress and egress from a public right-of-way, seven (7) days a week, twenty four (24) hours a day to access the Ground Space, Cabling Space, and Rooftop Space (subject to limited Building access discussed in the Agreement) for the purpose of installation, operation and maintenance of Tenant’s communications facility. The Ground Space, Rooftop Space, Cabling Space and Access Rights are hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Premises” and are as shown on Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof. Attachment 2 2 DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 3. The Commencement Date of the Agreement, of which this is a Memorandum, is based upon the date Tenant is granted a building permit by the governmental agency charged with issuing such permits, or the date of execution of the Agreement by the Parties, whichever is later. 4. If Landlord elects, during the initial term and all renewal terms of the Agreement, to grant to a third party by easement or other legal instrument an interest in and to the Premises, for the purpose of operating and maintaining communications facilities or the management thereof, with or without an assignment of the Agreement to such third party, Tenant shall have the right of first refusal to meet any bona fide offer of sale or transfer on the same terms and conditions of such offer. 5. The terms, covenants and provisions of the Agreement, the terms of which are hereby incorporated by reference into this Memorandum, shall extend to and be binding upon the respective executors, administrators, heirs, successors and assigns of Landlord and Tenant. Signatures on following page 3 DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, LANDLORD and TENANT have caused this Memorandum to be duly executed on the date of full execution. LANDLORD: City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado By: Name: Joyce Jay Title: Mayor Date: ATTEST:___________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk [seal] APPROVED AS TO FORM: ________________________________ Gerald Dahl, City Attorney TENANT: Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless By: Name: ______________________________ Title: ______________________________ Date: ______________________________ 4 DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF ___________________ ) I, ___________________, a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby certify that Joyce Jay personally came before me this day and acknowledged that she is the Mayor of The City of Wheat Ridge, and she, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing MEMORANDUM OF LAND AND ROOFTOP LEASE AGREEMENT as her own act and deed on behalf of The City of Wheat Ridge. WITNESS my hand and official Notarial Seal, this day of , 20___. ____________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: ______________________ STATE OF _________________ ) ) ACKNOWLEDGEMENT COUNTY OF ___________________ ) I, ___________________, a Notary Public for said County and State, do hereby certify that ___________________personally came before me this day and acknowledged that they are the ___________________ of Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and they, being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing MEMORANDUM OF LAND AND ROOFTOP LEASE AGREEMENT as their own act and deed on behalf of Verizon Wireless (VAW) LLC d/b/a Verizon Wireless. WITNESS my hand and official Notarial Seal, this day of , 20___. ____________________________________ Notary Public My Commission Expires: ______________________ 5 DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 EXHIBIT “A” DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: APN: 203666 PARCEL A: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21, WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS S00º04'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 1315.13 FEET; THENCE S89º24'00"W, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KIPLING STREET; THENCE S00º04'58"E, ALONG THE SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF KIPLING STREET, A DISTANCE OF 30.59 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF KIPLING STREET THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: S00º04'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 107.70 FEET; S89º24'00"W, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; S00º04'58"W, A DISTANCE OF 237.46 FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF KIPLING STREET, N90º00'00"W A DISTANCE OF 178.57 FEET; THENCE S03º33'38"E, A DISTANCE OF 196.43 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 29º00'21", A RADIUS OF 50.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 25.31 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT; THENCE ALONG SAID TANGENT S32º33'59"E, A DISTANCE OF 132.81 FEET; THENCE S51º57'45"W, A DISTANCE OF 34.51 FEET: THENCE N32º33'59"W A DISTANCE OF 118.69 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVE; THENCE ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49º29'42", A RADIUS OF 32.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 27.64 FEET; THENCE N00º00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF 126.23 FEET; THENCE N05º12'16"W, A DISTANCE OF 52.78 FEET; THENCE N03º33'38"W, A DISTANCE OF 59.79 FEET; THENCE N90º00'00"W, A DISTANCE OF 377.06 FEET; THENCE N00º00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF 124.22 FEET; THENCE S90º00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF 428.17 FEET: THENCE N00º00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF 219.29 FEET; THENCE N89º24'00"E, A DISTANCE OF 167.70 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL B: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21, WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS S00º04'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 1315.13 FEET; THENCE S89º24'00"W, ALONG THE NORTH OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21, A 6 DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KIPLING STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF KIPLING STREET THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES S00º04'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 138.29 FEET S89º24'00"W, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET S00º04'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 237.46 FEET THENCE DEPARTING SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KIPLING STREET, N90º00'00"W, A DISTANCE OF 209.31 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S03º33'38"E, A DISTANCE OF 59.79 FEET; THENCE S05º12'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 52.78 FEET; THENCE S00º00'00"W, A DISTANCE OF 195.18 FEET; THENCE N90º00'00"W, A DISTANCE OF 385.56 FEET; THENCE N00º00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF 307.40 FEET; THENCE S90º00'00"E, A DISTANCE OF 377.06 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. APN: 203660 A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21, WHENCE THE SOUTHEAST CORNER THEREOF BEARS S.00º04’58”E., A DISTANCE OF 1315.13 FEET; THENCE S.89°24'00"W., ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 21, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KIPLING STREET AND THE EASTERLY EXTENSION OF THE SOUTH BOUNDARY UNE OF GREEN VALLEY SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN BOOK 11 AT PAGE 34 IN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING S.89°24'00'W., ALONG SAID EASTERLY EXTENSION AND SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 621.82 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF CAMBRIDGE PARK SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN BOOK 125 AT PAGES 39 THROUGH 41, IN JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE S.00º08’23”E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID CAMBRIDGE PARK SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 1026.29 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 80076775 IN JEFFERSON COUNTY RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWING TEN (10) COURSES: 1. N.58°51'37"E., A DISTANCE OF 32.00 FEET; 2. N.02°18`23"W., A DISTANCE OF 67.00 FEET; 3. N.47°41'37"E., A DISTANCE OF 47.00 FEET; 4. N.78°21'37"E., A DISTANCE OF 180.00 FEET; 5. N.50°11'37"E., A DISTANCE OF 53.00 FEET; 6. N.01°31'37'1E., A DISTANCE OF 74.00 FEET; 7. N.73°43'23"W., A DISTANCE OF 31.00 FEET; 8. N.27°58'09"E., A DISTANCE OF 63.68 FEET; 9. N.63°43'27"E., A DISTANCE OF 57.06 FEET; 10. S.00°06'41"E., A DISTANCE OF 35.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF BLEVINS SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN BOOK 29 AT PAGE 23; THENCE N.63°22'33"E., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SUBDIVISION, A DISTANCE OF 313.59 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KIPLING STREET; THENCE N.00º04’58”W., ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 259.62 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST 40TH AVENUE; THENCE S.89°24'00"W., ALONG SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 280.75 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF BLEVINS SUBDIVISION; THENCE N.00º06’41”W., ALONG SAID WEST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID WEST 40TH AVENUE; 7 DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 THENCE N.89°24'00"E., ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 280.78 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID KIPLING STREET; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING THREE (3) COURSES: 1. N.00°04'58"W., A DISTANCE OF 130.01 FEET; 2. N.89°24'00"E., A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; 3. N.00°04'58"W., A DISTANCE OF 138.29 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. 8 DEN Liam/309715 Active/45513398.1 EXHIBIT “B” PREMISES (Attached) Lo c a t i o n Pr o p o s e d Ex i s t i n g DEN LIAM 4005 Kipling StreetWheat Ridge, CO 80033 View 1 of 3 April 12, 2016 Prepared by: ZLN 1 PROPOSED ANTENNA ARRAY TO BE INSTALLED BEHIND RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WALLS PER CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (TYP OF 3 LOCATIONS) Attachment 3 Lo c a t i o n Pr o p o s e d Ex i s t i n g DEN LIAM 4005 Kipling StreetWheat Ridge, CO 80033 April 12, 2016 Prepared by: ZLN View 2 of 3 2 PROPOSED ANTENNA ARRAY TO BE INSTALLED BEHIND RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WALLS PER CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (TYP OF 3 LOCATIONS) Lo c a t i o n Pr o p o s e d Ex i s t i n g DEN LIAM 4005 Kipling StreetWheat Ridge, CO 80033 April 12, 2016 Prepared by: ZLN View 3 of 3 3 PROPOSED ANTENNA ARRAY TO BE INSTALLED BEHIND RF TRANSPARENT SCREEN WALLS PER CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (TYP OF 3 LOCATIONS) ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 14-2017 – AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 16-81 AND 16-84 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO LEGALIZE GRAVITY KNIVES AND SWITCHBLADES, CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (06/26/2017) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (07/10/2017) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Chief of Police City Manager ISSUE: Through the adoption of Senate Bill 17-008 during the last legislative session, the Colorado Legislature amended state statutes to remove gravity knives and switchblades from the list of weapons that it is unlawful to possess under state law. This amendment goes into effect on August 9, 2017. The Wheat Ridge Police Department recommends amending sections 16-81 and 16-84 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws to legalize gravity knives and switchblades, to be consistent with state law. PRIOR ACTION: There is no prior action by Council regarding this issue. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact to the City for this ordinance change. BACKGROUND: On March 23, 2017, the Colorado Legislature, through Senate Bill 17-008, amended Colorado Revised Statutes 18-12-101 to remove the definitions of “gravity knife” and “switchblade,” and amended 18-12-102 to remove them as illegal weapons. Amendment to Legalize Gravity Knives and Switchblades July 10, 2017 Page 2 Colorado law first prohibited possession of mechanical knives in 1951. This prohibition remained in place until a new law was enacted in 1971. Under the 1971 law, gravity knives and switchblade knives were included in the definition of “illegal weapon,” and possession of an illegal weapon was classified as a class 1 misdemeanor. In 1979, the law was amended to include a definition of “dangerous weapons” and create an analogous prohibition on possessing a dangerous weapon, a class 5 felony. Gravity knives and switchblade knives have continued to be classified as “illegal weapons.” A gravity knife means any knife where the blade is released from the handle or sheath by the force of gravity or the application of centrifugal force, and which blade, upon release, becomes locked in place by means of a button, spring, plate, level or other device. A switchblade knife means any knife where the blade opens automatically by manual pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in its handle. By state law and city ordinance, any knife or blade over three and one-half inches in length may not be carried concealed. This does not include a knife or hatchet of the type customarily used in hunting, fishing or camping when such is being carried for sporting use; and does not include any instruments being used in pursuance of a lawful home use, trade, occupation, profession, or other uses that are lawful under federal or state statutes; and does not include items of display or a collector's items in any home or place of business. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends amending sections 16-81 and 16-84 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws to legalize gravity knives and switchblades, to be consistent with state law. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Council Bill 14-2017, an ordinance to amend sections 16-81 and 16-84 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws to legalize gravity knives and switchblades, consistent with state law, on second reading, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication.” Or, “I move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill 14-2017, an ordinance to amend sections 16-81 and 16-84 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws to legalize gravity knives and switchblades, consistent with state law for the following reason(s) _______________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Daniel Brennan, Chief of Police Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill 14-2017 2. Senate Bill 17-008 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER MATHEWS Council Bill No. 14 Ordinance No. __________ Series of 2017 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 16-81 AND 16-84 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO LEGALIZE GRAVITY KNIVES AND SWITCHBLADES, CONSISTENT WITH STATE LAW WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado (the “City”), is a Colorado home rule municipality, duly organized and existing pursuant to Section 6 of Article XX of the Colorado Constitution; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule authority and C.R.S. § 31-15-401, the City, acting through its City Council (the “Council”), is authorized to adopt rules and regulations prohibiting certain conduct and defining general offenses that harm or pose a threat to the public health, safety or welfare; and WHEREAS, pursuant to such authority, the Council has previously defined and adopted certain general offenses, codified as Chapter 16 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (“Code”), including a prohibition of carrying, concealing and using illegal weapons, generally consistent with a parallel state statute; and WHEREAS, through the adoption of Senate Bill 17-008 during the last legislative session, the Colorado Legislature amended the parallel state statute to remove gravity knives and switchblades from the list of weapons that it is unlawful to possess under state law; and WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Police Department has recommended that certain provisions of the Code be amended to achieve the same result under local law, in the interests of consistency and uniform enforcement; and WHEREAS, the Council therefore finds that it is desirable and appropriate to amend the Code to eliminate the inclusion of gravity knives and switchblades in the list of illegal weapons, to be consistent with state law. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 16-81 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning definitions relevant to weapons offenses, is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 16-81. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this division, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Blackjack means any billy, sandclub, sandbag, sap or other hand-operated striking weapon consisting, at the striking end, of an encased piece of lead or other heavy substance and, at the handle end, a strap or springy shaft which increases the force of Attachment 1 2 impact; or any device or article consisting of two (2) or more separate portions, linked together by a chain, strap or other fastener, which configuration is designed to increase the striking force or impact of the device or article. Concealment means the deliberate hiding of a weapon upon or near the person with the intent to avoid the lawful detection thereof. It shall be evidence of concealment that the weapon is hidden so as to make it immediately available for use in the fashion in which the weapon is designed to be used. Crossbow means any device resembling a rifle or handgun in configuration, having a bow or similar device mounted perpendicularly to a stock, grip or frame, and usually equipped with a winch or similar device which draws back the bowstring and cocks the weapon and which fires an arrow, bolt, quarrel, stone or similar shaft from a groove or depression in the stock, grip or frame by the manipulation of a trigger or similar mechanism. Firearm means any pistol, revolver, self-loading pistol, rifle, shotgun or any other device designed to shoot, project, throw or hurl a projectile or projectiles by means of the explosion of gunpowder or other explosive substance. Gravity knife means any knife the blade of which is released from the handle or sheath thereof by the force of gravity or the application of centrifugal force and which blade, upon release, becomes locked in place by means of a button, spring, plate, level or other device. Knife means any dagger, knife, bayonet, straightrazor, dirk, machete, stiletto, sword or swordcane with a blade over three and one-half (3½) inches in length, or any other dangerous instrument designed to inflict cutting, stabbing or tearing wounds; but, as used in this section, does not include a knife or hatchet of the type customarily used in hunting, fishing or camping when such is being carried for sporting use; and does not include any instruments being used in pursuance of a lawful home use, trade, occupation or profession or otherwise being lawful under federal or state statutes, or being used as an item of display or a collector's item in any home or place of business. Switchblade knife means any knife, the blade of which opens automatically by manual pressure applied to a button, spring or other device in its handle. Section 2. Section 16-84 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning illegal weapons, is hereby amended as follows: Sec. 16-84. - Carrying, etc., illegal weapons. (a) It is unlawful for any person to knowingly carry, conceal or cause to be concealed in any vehicle or to use any blackjack, gravity knife, multifixed bladed stellate throwing knife, switchblade knife or brass or metallic knuckles. (b) Nothing in this section shall apply to peace officers or to members of the Armed Forces of the United States or the Colorado National Guard acting in the lawful discharge of their duties. 3 Section 3. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability; Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 6 to 0 on this 26 day of June, 2017, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for July 10, 2017, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of ______ to ______, this ________ day of _____________________, 2017. SIGNED by the Mayor on this ________ day of ____________________, 2017. Joyce Jay, Mayor ATTEST: Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Approved As To Form Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney First Publication: June 29, 2017 Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: SENATE BILL 17-008 BY SENATOR(S) Hill, Baumgardner, Cooke, Crowder, Holbert, Lambert, Lundberg, Marble, Neville T., Priola, Scott, Sonnenberg; also REPRESENT ATIVE(S) Lebsock, Becker J ., Garnett, Humphrey, Lewis, Liston, Lundeen, McKean, Neville P., Singer, Van Winkle, Williams D., Wist, Duran. CONCERNING LEGALIZING CERTAIN KNIVES. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-12-101,amend (1) introductory portion; and repeal (l)(e) and (l)G) as follows: 18-12-101. Definitions -peace officer affirmative defense. (1) As used in this article ARTICLE 12, unless the context otherwise requires: (e)"61avity knife" mcm1s mry knife that has a blade 1clcased from the bandlc OI sheath thereof by the fo1cc of g1avity 01 the application of eenttifngal fo1ce. G)"Switchblade knife" means any knife, the blade of which opens automatically by hand pressme applied to a button, spring, 01 other de\'iec in its handle. Capital letters indicate new material added to existing statutes; dashes through words indicate deletions from existing statutes and such material not part of act. Attachment 2 SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 18-12-102, amend (2) as follows: 18-12-102. Possessing a dangerous or illegal weapon - affirmative defense. (2) As used in this section, the term "illegal weapon" means a blackjack, gas gun, OR metallic knuckles. giaoicy knife, 01 sw itchhladc knife. SECTION 3. Act subject to petition -effective date. This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 9, 2017, if adjournment sine die is on May 10, 2017); except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November2018 PAGE 2-SENA TE BILL 17-008 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor. Kevin . Grantham PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE ?](� Effie Ameen SECRETARY OF THE SENATE APPROVED 31 rz I rt1 PAGE3-SENATEBILL 17-008 Crisanta Duran SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES �1'tfu¢d�Marilyn Eddins CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ITEM NO: DATE: July 10, 2017 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 25-2017 - A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Director of Public Works City Manager ISSUE: The City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan serves as a guide to plan, construct, enhance and improve bicycle and pedestrian mobility throughout the City. The plan also guides and works in conjunction with the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to identify opportunities for improvements. In late 2015, it was felt by staff, Council and the community that the plan needed to be updated as a result of changing travel modes, community needs and priorities, and to also incorporate latest industry practices. PRIOR ACTION: After staff completed a standard solicitation and procurement process, the City Council on May 9, 2016, awarded a contract to Toole Design Group to assist the City in updating its Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Work on the plan commenced with the gathering of data and roll out of a public process in the summer of 2016. Updates were provided to Council on October 1, 2016 and on May 1, 2017. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for this work was approved in the 2016 and 2017 CIP Budget for the Bike/Pedestrian Master Plan, line item 30-303-800-853 in the amount of $60,000. Council Action Form – Bike Ped Master Plan July 10, 2017 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The City’s existing bicycle and sidewalk network can be described as scattered and incomplete. Sidewalks are often absent, or there are gaps along a number of collector and arterial streets in the City. In addition, the overall bicycle and pedestrian network in general lacks good continuity and/or connectivity to adjacent communities in some locations. Also, connectivity to parks, trails, schools, and other destinations in many areas is often limited. In 2010, the City developed and formally adopted a bicycle and pedestrian master plan. The plan provided guidance concerning street right-of-way needs and improvements to be implemented as proposed developments were reviewed and as City projects were designed. Since adoption of the 2010 plan, the City has implemented bicycle and pedestrian improvements where opportunities have presented themselves and where funding has been available; often in conjunction with other infrastructure improvements or maintenance-related projects. For example, bicycle lanes were installed on 32nd Avenue as part of a mill and overlay project. This not only improved bicycle safety and mobility within Wheat Ridge, but also provided improved east-west connectivity with Denver and Jefferson County/Golden. Similarly, bicycle facilities were installed on Pierce Street, providing a vital north-south corridor connection across the City between Lakewood and the Clear Creek Regional Trail. Additionally, construction of the Kipling multi-use trail has improved connectivity and safety for bicyclists and pedestrians needing to reach local destinations such as Crown Hill Park, the Clear Creek Trail, the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center, Discovery Park, Everett Middle School, local properties and businesses, and other destinations in adjacent communities within the Kipling corridor. Current design work for Wadsworth Boulevard improvements also includes provisions for future bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Smaller projects to improve safety, such as enhanced crosswalks and flashing beacons (particularly near schools), and small sidewalk projects to fill gaps, have been completed over the past few years. In addition to the City’s pavement management program, opportunities to enhance bicycle and pedestrian mobility have also occurred through private redevelopment projects, such as Kipling Ridge (Sprouts). The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan plays a significant role in guiding implementation of effective policies and practices to improve bicycle and pedestrian modes as convenient transportation options. In addition, the plan identifies specific mobility needs such as access to transit and safety enhancement opportunities. The plan also assists in identifying and prioritizing long-term capital needs and costs, and the development of a long-term capital plan for constructing improvements. Several key steps and courses of action have been completed as part of the plan update, including the following: 1. Mapping and supporting data have been updated to summarize existing infrastructure assets, identify existing transportation gaps and safety needs, and to provide base Council Action Form – Bike Ped Master Plan July 10, 2017 Page 3 mapping for future improvements. 2. The City and the consultant hosted a “Vision and Goals” workshop in August, 2016 with various community stakeholders, including representatives of Jefferson County Schools, the Wheat Ridge Active Transportation and Advisory Team (ATAT), Bike JeffCo, RTD, CDOT, and other key stakeholders such as the senior community. In addition to developing a draft mission and goals statement, the group discussed and identified various needs and issues, such as destinations, gaps, barriers, safety needs, ways to prioritize, and suggestions regarding overall process and policy. 3. A web site was created to present information and ways to encourage citizens to provide input regarding the plan, including an on-line “Wiki-Map,” an easily accessible, on-line map where users can click on suggestions and directly add input to the map. 4. Input was solicited through standard communication channels, including strong promotion through social media. A flyer/handout (in both English and Spanish) was also created to encourage participation and input. Representatives of both the City and the consulting agency promoted the update and encouraged public input through engagement at community events such as the Carnation Festival and Ridgefest. 5. The City and the consultant hosted two technical advisory committee (TAC) meetings late last year that included representatives of the stakeholder groups mentioned above and neighboring communities such as Lakewood, Arvada, Edgewater, and Jefferson County. This group’s discussion further expanded the needs and issues discussed at the Vision and Goals Workshop, such as connections to neighboring communities, wayfinding, and how the ADA Transition Plan (developed concurrently) should integrate with this plan. 6. A public informational meeting (open house) was held at the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center on October 5, 2016 to listen to the community directly and gather additional input. Information regarding the ADA Transition Plan was also provided at this meeting. Turnout for the meeting was strong, and a wide range of diverse interests were represented. Next steps and actions A draft of the updated Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan was completed and provided to Council for discussion and comment at the May 1, 2017 Study Session. This draft was also distributed to members of the Technical Advisory Group and posted on the City website for additional public input. All comments have been received, reviewed, and incorporated into the final document. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approving the attached resolution adopting the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Council Action Form – Bike Ped Master Plan July 10, 2017 Page 4 RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Resolution No. 25-2017, a resolution adopting the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.” Or, “I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution No. 25-2017, a resolution adopting the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan for the following reason(s): ___________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Scott Brink, Director of Public Works Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 25-2017 2. Bike/Ped Master Plan CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 25 Series of 2017 TITLE: A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, A bicycle and pedestrian master plan was previously completed by the City in 2010; and WHEREAS, The existing bicycle and pedestrian master plan requires updating as a result of changing community priorities and needs, the need for improved capital planning, and to reflect recent updates; and WHEREAS, The City, with the guidance of a professional consultant, have updated the plan through an extensive public process; and WHEREAS, said Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is ready to be formally adopted by the City Council in accordance with the City’s policies and procedures. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, that: The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, as presented to the City Council on this date, is adopted. This Resolution shall be effective immediately upon adoption. DONE AND RESOLVED this _____ day of ____________, 2017. Joyce Jay, Mayor ATTEST: Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Attachment 1 Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian MasteR Plan UPdate June 2017 Attachment 2 ii                            Page intentionally left blank     iii    Acknowledgments    City of Wheat Ridge City Council  Monica Duran  Janeece Hoppe  Kristi Davis  Zachary Urban  Tim Fitzgerald  George Pond  Larry Mathews  Genevieve Wooden  City of Wheat Ridge  Scott Brink  Mark Westberg  Steve Nguyen  Lisa Ritchie  Sara Spaulding     Technical Advisory Committee  City of Wheat Ridge: Public Works, Planning and Zoning   Ken Brubaker, Colorado Department of Transportation  Yelena Onnen, Jefferson County  Wesley Dismore, City of Arvada  John Padon, City of Lakewood  Rachel Hultin, Wheat Ridge Active Transportation Advisory Team  Charlie Myers, Bike Jeffco    Toole Design Group  Jessica Fields  Joe Fish  Geneva Hooten  Jared Draper   Ashley Haire  Kurtis Wall     Photo Credits: Toole Design Group, except as otherwise noted.    iv    Page intentionally left blank  v    CONTENTS   CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION _____________________________________________________________________ 1  Plan Purpose __________________________________________________________________________________ 1  The Wheat Ridge Context  _______________________________________________________________________ 1  Recent Accomplishments ________________________________________________________________________ 2  Public Engagement Process ______________________________________________________________________ 3  Plan Vision and Goals ___________________________________________________________________________ 9  CHAPTER 2: WALKING AND BIKING IN WHEAT RIDGE TODAY _________________________________________ 10  Levels of Bicycling and Walking __________________________________________________________________ 10  Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes __________________________________________________________________ 12  Facilities_____________________________________________________________________________________ 12  Barriers to Walking and Bicycling  ________________________________________________________________ 17  CHAPTER 3: BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS _________________________________________________ 19  Current Programs _____________________________________________________________________________ 19  New Program Recommendations ________________________________________________________________ 21  CHAPTER 4: PEDESTRIAN ELEMENT ______________________________________________________________ 27  Introduction _________________________________________________________________________________ 27  Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox ____________________________________________________________________ 28  Priority Pedestrian Routes ______________________________________________________________________ 35  Citywide Pedestrian Recommendations ___________________________________________________________ 37  School Walksheds _____________________________________________________________________________ 37  CHAPTER 5: BICYCLE ELEMENT __________________________________________________________________ 40  Introduction _________________________________________________________________________________ 40  Bicycle Facilities Toolbox _______________________________________________________________________ 40  Bicycle Network Development  __________________________________________________________________ 44  Bicycle Facility Recommendations ________________________________________________________________ 47  CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTATION _________________________________________________________________ 51  Prioritization _________________________________________________________________________________ 51  Cost Estimates ________________________________________________________________________________ 55  Implementation Strategy _______________________________________________________________________ 58  Conclusion ___________________________________________________________________________________ 58  APPENDICES  Appendix A: Related Plans  Appendix B: K‐8 School Walkshed Maps  Appendix C: ATAT Pedestrian Priority Routes  Appendix D: Funding Sources  vi                              Page intentionally left blank  1    CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION  Wheat Ridge is a city with strong historical roots, yet it is undergoing  change along with the rest of the Denver region. New residents and  businesses are bringing fresh ideas to the City and strengthening its  character and sense of place. Additionally, the Regional  Transportation District (RTD) will begin rail service to downtown  Denver on the Gold Line in 2017, potentially catalyzing significant  reinvestment along the northern edge of Wheat Ridge. At the same  time, there is a strong commitment to preserving the heritage of  Wheat Ridge and a desire to ensure long‐time residents continue to  feel at home in their city. The 2017 Wheat Ridge Bicycle and  Pedestrian Master Plan provides a blueprint for creating a more  bicycle and pedestrian‐friendly city within this dynamic framework.   Plan Purpose  This Plan serves as an update to the 2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian  Master Plan, which presented a framework of practical and  comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian facilities that promoted safe,  sustainable, and healthy travel options. Since the previous Plan was  completed, the City has implemented a number of projects to  improve conditions for people walking and biking. The 2017 Plan  builds on these successes and establishes a vision for a complete  and connected network of bicycle facilities and pedestrian routes,  along with recommended policies to support active transportation.  The Plan’s recommendations support the Wheat Ridge community’s  vision for safe, active transportation that is accessible to a wide  range of people, including youth and seniors, families, bicyclists of  varying skill levels, and people with disabilities.   The Wheat Ridge Context   The City of Wheat Ridge is in the west Denver metro area and shares  borders with Denver, Lakewood, Edgewater, Arvada, and Lakeside.  As such, Wheat Ridge plays an important role in regional  connectivity. It is generally bounded by Interstate 70 (I‐70) to the  north and west, Sheridan Boulevard to the east, and West 26th  Avenue to the south.   For its 31,000 residents, the city offers a small town feel with access  to amenities more commonly found in larger cities. Wheat Ridge is  close to the recreational opportunities available in the foothills and  provides easy access to the Rocky Mountains via I‐70. There are also  a large number of City parks and Crown Hill Park, which is owned  and maintained by Jefferson County Open Space.   Plan Organization  This Plan is organized into six  chapters including this one.   Chapter 1 serves as the  introduction to the plan and  includes the Wheat Ridge  context, recent  accomplishments, the planning  process, and Plan vision and  goals.   Chapter 2 provides an overview  of the current status of bicycling  and walking in Wheat Ridge.  Chapter 3 summarizes current  programs related to bicycling  and walking and provides  suggestions for possible future  program efforts.   Chapter 4 represents the  pedestrian element of the Plan,  including the identification of  priority pedestrian routes and  appropriate pedestrian  treatments for implementation  in Wheat Ridge.   Chapter 5 represents the bicycle  element of the Plan, including  recommended bicycle facilities  and associated costs.   Chapter 6 includes prioritized  bicycle and pedestrian projects  to conclude the Plan.  Appendices provide  supplemental detail on topics  such as related plans, priority  pedestrian routes, and funding  sources.   2    The city’s land use and street network patterns greatly influence how people get around today. In the  eastern portion of the city (closer to Denver), the street grid is well connected, but as post‐WWII  development occurred farther west, streets were built with less emphasis on connectivity. This resulted  in high volumes of traffic being funneled onto arterials such as Wadsworth Boulevard and Kipling Street,  which now act as barriers for people walking and bicycling. The city’s main east/west streets ‐ 44th  Avenue and 38th Avenue ‐ provide good connectivity for vehicles, but are less comfortable for bicyclists  and pedestrians. Lower‐volume city streets are often more comfortable for people walking and biking.  However, these streets are generally narrow and lack pedestrian facilities such as sidewalks and curb  ramps, creating a character that reflects the city’s rural heritage but also posing challenges for  retrofitting these streets with pedestrian and bicycle facilities.    Recent Accomplishments   The City has implemented many of the proposed projects from the 2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master  Plan. These projects were constructed through routine street maintenance and dedicated funding from  City Council. Key improvements implemented since 2010 include:    Sidewalk on Wadsworth Boulevard, between 26th Avenue and 32nd Avenue   Bike lane, paved shoulder, and shared lane markings on Pierce Street from 26th Avenue to 48th  Avenue   Bike lane along West 32nd Avenue from Sheridan Boulevard to Youngfield Street   Trail or sidewalk along Kipling Street, from 32nd Avenue to the Clear Creek Trail, including a  bicycle and pedestrian bridge over Clear Creek   Clear Creek Trail trailhead improvements at Kipling Street   Bike lanes on Tabor Street, north of I‐70   Striped shoulder on Miller Street, north of 44th Avenue    In addition to these accomplishments, several important projects are currently under development. In  November 2016, Wheat Ridge residents voted to support Ballot Issue 2E, a 12 year, ½ cent sales tax that  will fund four major projects, three of which will create better conditions for walking and bicycling.  Revenues from the tax will be used to leverage state and federal grants to reconfigure Wadsworth  Boulevard, to fund infrastructure improvements around the Wheat Ridge ‐ Ward Station on the G Line  near 52nd Avenue and Ward Road, and to implement infrastructure improvements associated with the  Clear Creek Crossing development at Youngfield Street and I‐70.   The City is currently developing an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan to improve  accessibility to pedestrian facilities. The Transition Plan includes an assessment of existing pedestrian  facilities (i.e., sidewalks and curb ramps) along roadways to document the presence and condition of  these facilities. The Transition Plan will catalog existing barriers to ADA access and include strategies to  address them.   3    Active Transportation Advisory Team (ATAT) fun ride to celebrate the Kipling Street Trail Ribbon Cutting, October 2016 (Photo  Credit: ATAT)   Public Engagement Process  Wheat Ridge residents and stakeholders played a critical role in shaping the 2017 Plan Update. Public  engagement was focused on Wheat Ridge residents and visitors, community stakeholders, the project  Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), and City Council to meet the following goals:    To solicit feedback on existing walking and bicycling issues and successes,   To educate the public and stakeholders about pedestrian and bicycle facilities,    To develop proposals for enhancing walking and bicycling in Wheat Ridge,   To build momentum for plan implementation and related efforts, and   To be equitable and balanced across the City.   The workshops, events, and meetings conducted as part of this project’s community engagement  process are discussed in this section of the Plan.          4    Vision and Goals Workshop   The first official meeting for the project was a Vision and Goals workshop held on August 5, 2016. The  purpose of this workshop – held with City staff, stakeholders, advocates, and community members –  was to introduce the project and solicit input regarding the future of walking and biking in Wheat Ridge.  Attendees answered the following questions:  1. What three words best describe bicycling in Wheat Ridge today?   2. What three words best describe walking in Wheat Ridge today?   3. What one word describes your future vision for active transportation in Wheat Ridge?    Responses showed that there are major barriers within the City posed by Interstate‐70 and principal  arterials like Wadsworth Boulevard. However, stakeholders envision a connected, integrated, and  intuitive city for people who walk or bike. Responses gathered at this workshop directly influenced the  Vision and Goals statements.             Online Map‐Based Survey   The project team developed an online interactive map that was available for input between June and  October 2016. Users were asked to identify routes they already use or would use if made safe and  convenient and any barriers to bicycling or walking (see Chapter 2 for more discussion of the survey  results). The map was available as a link from the project page on the City’s website, and was widely  shared with help from city staff and community members.   August 5, 2016, Vision and Goals Workshop  5           Online map‐based survey  6    Ridgefest  The project team spoke to approximately 60 people at the Ridgefest event on Saturday, September 10,  2016 in central Wheat Ridge between 3:00 PM and 7:00 PM.1 This free, all‐ages event was an  opportunity for the community to celebrate the heritage of Ridge at 38 through diverse offerings like a  classic car show, an artisan marketplace, beer tasting and food contests, and local bluegrass music.     This event targeted the citizens of Wheat Ridge and provided a forum to introduce the project, advertise  the online interactive map, share information about the RTD G Line, and engage in one‐on‐one dialogue  about walking and biking in Wheat Ridge. Using a plotted map with existing bicycle routes and  previously planned facilities, the project team asked people where they lived and places they wanted to  go, sparking discussions about challenging intersections, streets with missing sidewalks, and much more.      The project team discusses potential new bikeways and pedestrian routes at the 38th Avenue RidgeFest, September 2016 (Photo  Credit: ATAT)                                                                 1 Ridge at 38. 2016 RidgeFest. http://ridgeat38.com/event/2016‐ridgefest/   7    Technical Advisory Committee (TAC)   The TAC is composed of City staff and representatives from Jefferson County, the Cities of Arvada and  Lakewood, the Colorado Department of Transportation, and advocacy organizations.   The TAC met twice over the course of the project and played an important role in the development of  this Plan. TAC members guided the overall direction of the project, spread the word about the Plan,  contributed ideas and offered local expertise, and reviewed recommendations.    The first TAC meeting was held in September  2016 at City Hall. In addition to an overview  of the project’s existing conditions and draft  themes, the group discussed pedestrian  network recommendations.   The second TAC meeting was held in  November 2016. The project team  presented key recommendation themes  which had emerged through the Vision and  Goals workshop, meetings with City staff,  and public engagement. The following  themes emerged:   Pedestrian Themes   Access to transit   Focus on key destinations (shopping centers, schools, parks, etc.)   Integration with ADA Transition Plan   Serve needs of aging population and younger families  Bicycle Network Themes   Access to G Line Stations (Ward Road, Arvada Ridge, Olde Town Arvada)   Access to Clear Creek Trail   Crossing Interstate‐70   Connectivity to neighboring jurisdictions  o 35th Avenue to Denver  o South to Lakewood and the W Line  o I‐70 crossings and G Line Station areas to Arvada  o Clear Creek Trail to Golden  The team reviewed the online interactive map input which showed that safety concerns at intersections,  heavy traffic, and high vehicle speeds were the most common barriers for both walking and bicycling.  Additionally, priority pedestrian routes for the Plan and sidewalk walksheds around schools were  discussed (see Chapter 4 and Appendix B).         September 22, 2016 TAC Meeting    8    Open House  Over 40 people attended the project open house on Wednesday, October 5, 2016 at the Apex Center  between 6:00 PM and 8:00 PM. The team presented information on several topics:    Project schedule   Draft vision and goals for the Plan    Previous planning efforts, including the 2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan and the 2015  Parks & Recreation Master Plan   The ADA Transition Plan   Non‐infrastructure policies and programs in education, encouragement, and enforcement    Bicycle comfort assessment and the level of traffic stress concept    Attendees provided valuable feedback in several areas:    Existing education, enforcement and encouragement programs     Preferred bicycle facility types (e.g., protected bike lanes, sidepaths, trails, and buffered bike  lanes) as they relate to levels of traffic stress    Key bicycle and pedestrian routes between key activity centers within the City   Streets and intersections where infrastructure improvements, improved crossings, traffic  calming, better signal detection for bicyclists, etc. are desired         October 5, 2016 Open House    9    Open House participants were given three voting dots and were asked ‘What’s Most Important to You?’  in each of the following categories: access, facilities, and programs. This exercise was intended as an  introduction to the main themes of the Plan and to gauge priorities going forward. Residents showed  their overwhelming support for the following:    Access to transit, e.g., G Line Stations   Better Clear Creek Trail Connections   Connections to neighboring cities   Closing sidewalk gaps   Better street crossings   More encouragement programs  Plan Vision and Goals   A vision statement is an inspirational description of the future that should be realistic, yet ambitious. It  should answer the question, “what will success look like?”. The following vision statement was  developed for the Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan based on input received at the  Visioning and Goals Workshop:   The Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan envisions Wheat Ridge as a comfortable and safe  place to walk and ride a bike for people of all ages and abilities. The network of bicycle and  pedestrian facilities is connected, intuitive, and integrated with the local and regional context.  The system promotes health, safety, and regional connectivity for all residents.   The following goals support and promote the vision by providing a framework for the development of  the Plan’s recommendations:   1. Complete a connected network of comfortable bicycle facilities.   2. Create a walkable city that is comfortable and safe for residents of all ages and abilities.    3. Improve connections between all types of transportation, especially transit.   4. Increase access to the region’s parks, major destinations, and recreational opportunities.   5. Create a plan that is implementable and sensitive to the Wheat Ridge context.   The vision and goals served as the foundation for the development of plan recommendations.      10    CHAPTER 2: WALKING AND BIKING IN WHEAT RIDGE TODAY  Before making recommendations for the expansion of bicycling and walking programs and facilities, it is  important to understand current conditions. This section provides a summary of bicycling and walking  trends, facilities, and crashes. This baseline assessment was used to inform the development of  recommendations and provide a snapshot for future comparison.   Levels of Bicycling and Walking  Despite having a street network that provides limited connectivity in many areas of the city, there are  encouraging trends related to biking and walking in Wheat Ridge. The number of people who bike to  work increased from around 40 in 2000 (0.3 percent of commuters) to around 200 per day by 2015 (1.4  percent of commuters), a four‐fold increase. By comparison, the statewide average increased from 0.8  percent to 1.3 percent during the same time period. Wheat Ridge had the highest rate of increase  among other nearby cities in the Denver Metro Area (Figure 1).2   Figure 1. Bicycling Commute Rates in 2000 and 2015 for Nearby Cities      Levels of walking in Wheat Ridge have also increased, although less significantly than bicycling rates.  Rates of walking as a share of all work commutes increased from 2.05 percent in 2000 to 2.55 percent  by 2015, a 24 percent increase (Figure 2). The statewide average remained constant during this time  period, and among the other nearby cities listed in Figure 2, only Golden showed a higher increase than  Wheat Ridge (27 percent increase). Furthermore, the combined growth in bicycling and walking was  higher in Wheat Ridge than in any other area.                                                                2 US Census. American Fact Finder. Means of Transportation to Work, Census 2000 Summary File 3 and 2011‐2015 American  Community Survey 5‐Year Estimates.   2.3% 1.7% 0.7% 0.5% 1.4% 0.5% 0.3% 1.0% 0.6% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% Denver Golden Lakewood Broomfield Wheat Ridge Arvada Westminster 2000 2015 11    Figure 2. Walking Commute Rates in 2000 and 2015 for Nearby Cities3    Despite these increases, the change in commute mode share does not tell the whole story. A survey  conducted for this project shows that Wheat Ridge residents who walk or bike daily are twice as likely to  do so for recreation than for transportation (Figure 3), indicating that levels of bicycling and walking may  be higher than suggested by the commute data.4     Figure 3. Trip Purpose among Survey Respondents Who Walk or Bike Daily                                                                   3 US Census. American Fact Finder. Means of Transportation to Work, Census 2000 Summary File 3 and 2011‐2015 American  Community Survey 5‐Year Estimates.  4 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Online Survey.  9.0% 4.5% 2.5% 1.5% 1.0% 1.3% 1.0% 7.1% 4.3% 2.1% 1.5% 1.1% 1.0% 0.9% Golden Denver Wheat Ridge Lakewood Broomfield Westminster Arvada 2000 2015 Recreation 67% Transportation 33% 12      Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes  Between 2011 and 2013, there were 51 reported crashes involving a pedestrian and 36 reported crashes  involving a bicyclist within or adjacent to the Wheat Ridge city boundary. The injury totals for these  crashes are shown in Table 1. Although the overall number of crashes is small compared to the number  of motor vehicle crashes, these crashes often result in injury. Fortunately, there were no reported  fatalities from 2011 through 2013.     Table 1. Crashes Involving Pedestrians and Bicyclists, 2011‐20135  Type Year Crashes Injury Level  No Injury Possible Injury Minor Injury Serious Injury Killed  Pe d e s t r i a n   2011 20  26 5 8 6  0  2012 16 19 2 8 3 0  2013 15  17 2 7 4  0  Bi k e   2011 11 12 1 7 1 0  2012 11  13 2 6 1  0  2013 14 23 4 7 0 0  Total 87  110 16 43  15  0    Facilities  While most streets in the City do not currently have bicycle facilities and many lack sidewalks, bike lanes  have been installed on several important through streets, including 32nd Avenue, 26th Avenue, and  portions of Pierce Street and Tabor Street. Additionally, the Clear Creek Trail provides an important  east/west connection. Residential streets in Wheat Ridge typically have very low traffic volumes and  therefore may provide a comfortable bicycling experience without dedicated bicycle facilities. Lack of  sidewalks is more problematic, particularly for young children who are not always aware of nearby  dangers such as approaching cars, or for people using wheelchairs or other mobility devices.                                                                5 Denver Regional Council of Governments Regional Data Catalog. Crash Points Shapefiles. Crashes within 250 feet of Wheat  Ridge City Boundaries are included. Years 2011 through 2013 were the more recent three years of available data as of January  2017.     13    A neighborhood street is typically comfortable for riders of all ages and abilities (Photo Credit: ATAT)  Wheat Ridge currently implements high‐visibility crosswalks on a routine basis in school zones, adjacent  to parks, and at busy intersections. The City has also proactively installed pedestrian crossings in several  locations around the City, including:   Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) on West 44th Avenue at Van Gordon Street, Robb  Street, east of Miller Street, and at Lamar Street (see below).   RRFBs on West 32nd Avenue at Wheat Ridge High School/Crown Hill Park.   RRFBs along West 38th Avenue at Upham Street and Benton Street.    Pedestrian signal on West 38th Avenue at Kullerstrand Elementary School.   Pedestrian signal on West 41st Avenue at Wilmore‐Davis Elementary School.    14      Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons provide visibility to pedestrians at crosswalks   Vehicle speeds have been proven to be the most important  factor in determining the level of comfort a person feels while  biking or walking on a particular street. For this reason,  transportation professionals use a suite of design techniques  known as “traffic calming” to help slow traffic on  neighborhood streets. Traffic calming solutions may include  curb extensions, raised crosswalks, speed humps, or traffic  circles, among others.    Traffic calming strategies have not been widely implemented  in Wheat Ridge, but the City does have an existing  Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) that  allows residents to request traffic calming measures in  response to speeding concerns. The city has implemented a  variety of traffic calming treatments such as curb extensions,  chicanes, and median dividers (e.g., on Teller Street south of  34th Avenue and on 41st Avenue between Brentwood Street  and Wadsworth Boulevard).      Chicane with On‐Street Parking   Curb Extensions Median Divider with Pedestrian Refuge JOHNSONPARK WR HISTORICALPARK BOYD'SCROSSINGPARKBAUGHPARK APEL-BACHERPARK HOPPERHOLLOW PARKPROSPECTPARKANDERSONPARKHAPPINESSGARDENSPARK RANDALLPARKTOWNCENTERWHEAT RIDGERECREATIONCENTER LOUISETURNER PARK COMMUNITYCENTER PANORAMA PARKLEWISMEADOWSPARK STITESPARKHAYWARDPARK RICHARDS-HARTESTATE MANWARINGATHLETICFIELD PARAMOUNTPARK FRUITDALEPARK YE OLDEFIREHOUSE 37TH& UPHAMPARKDISCOVERYPARK CROWN HILLLAKE PARK West 32nd Avenue West 38th Avenue West 44th Avenue Ralston Road West48thAvenue Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t West 58th Avenue K i p l i n g P a r k w a y Wa r d R o a d Sh e r i d a n B o u l e v a r d Ki p l i n g S t r e e t W a d s w o r t h B y p a s s Wa d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d West 46th Avenue West 26th Avenue Pa r f e t S t r e e t West 44th Avenue Lo w e l l B o u l e v a r d West 56th Avenue West 27th Avenue Te l l e r S t r e e t Ridge Road Grandview Avenue Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t Y a r r o w S t r e e t West 58th Avenue West 17th Avenue West 20th Avenue West 52nd Avenue B r o ok s D r i v e West 32nd Avenue Fi e l d S t r e e t W e s t 48th Avenue Ha r l a n S t r e e t Ol d e W a d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d Wes t 38th Avenue West 23rd Avenue Ca r r S t r e e t L u t h e r a n P a r k w a y Te n n y s o n S t r e e t We s t 5 0 t h A v e n u e West 29th Avenue West 41st Avenue West 57th Avenue Ro b b S t r e e t Mi l l e r S t r e e t Q u a i l S t r e e t West 55th Avenue West 54th Avenue West 25th Avenue Al k i r e S t r e e t D e n v e r W e s t P a r k w a y T a b l e MountainParkway North Interstate Highway 70 Service R o a d North Interstate Highway 7 0 Fr o n t a g e R o a d Pi e r c e S t r e e t West 35th Avenue West 60th Avenue I n d e p e n d e n c e S tr e e t Oa k S t r e e t Wa r d R o a d El d r i d g e S t r e e t La m a r S t r e e t M a r s h a l l S t r e e t Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Ta b o r S t r e e t Pe r r y S t r e e t Ga r r i s o n S t r e e t Du d l e y S t r e e t Al l i s o n S t r e e t Si m m s S t r e e t Figure 4. Existing Pedestrian FacilitiesCity of Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Date: 6/22/2017 City Boundary G Line Station Park Existing Facilities Trail Sidepath Sidewalk 0 0.5 10.25 Miles JOHNSONPARK WR HISTORICALPARK BOYD'SCROSSINGPARKBAUGHPARK APEL-BACHERPARK HOPPERHOLLOW PARKPROSPECTPARKANDERSONPARKHAPPINESSGARDENSPARK RANDALLPARKTOWNCENTERWHEAT RIDGERECREATIONCENTER LOUISETURNER PARK COMMUNITYCENTER PANORAMA PARKLEWISMEADOWSPARK STITESPARKHAYWARDPARK RICHARDS-HARTESTATE MANWARINGATHLETICFIELD PARAMOUNTPARK FRUITDALEPARK YE OLDEFIREHOUSE 37TH& UPHAMPARKDISCOVERYPARK CROWN HILLLAKE PARK West 32nd Avenue West 38th Avenue West 44th Avenue Ralston Road West48thAvenue Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t West 58th Avenue K i p l i n g P a r k w a y Wa r d R o a d Sh e r i d a n B o u l e v a r d Ki p l i n g S t r e e t W a d s w o r t h B y p a s s Wa d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d West 46th Avenue West 26th Avenue Pa r f e t S t r e e t West 44th Avenue Lo w e l l B o u l e v a r d West 56th Avenue West 27th Avenue Te l l e r S t r e e t Ridge Road Grandview Avenue Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t Y a r r o w S t r e e t West 58th Avenue West 17th Avenue West 20th Avenue West 52nd Avenue B r o ok s D r i v e West 32nd Avenue Fi e l d S t r e e t W e s t 48th Avenue Ha r l a n S t r e e t Ol d e W a d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d Wes t 38th Avenue West 23rd Avenue Ca r r S t r e e t L u t h e r a n P a r k w a y Te n n y s o n S t r e e t We s t 5 0 t h A v e n u e West 29th Avenue West 41st Avenue West 57th Avenue Ro b b S t r e e t Mi l l e r S t r e e t Q u a i l S t r e e t West 55th Avenue West 54th Avenue West 25th Avenue Al k i r e S t r e e t D e n v e r W e s t P a r k w a y T a b l e MountainParkway North Interstate Highway 70 Service R o a d North Interstate Highway 7 0 Fr o n t a g e R o a d Pi e r c e S t r e e t West 35th Avenue West 60th Avenue I n d e p e n d e n c e S tr e e t Oa k S t r e e t Wa r d R o a d El d r i d g e S t r e e t La m a r S t r e e t M a r s h a l l S t r e e t Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Ta b o r S t r e e t Pe r r y S t r e e t Ga r r i s o n S t r e e t Du d l e y S t r e e t Al l i s o n S t r e e t Si m m s S t r e e t Figure 5. Existing Bicycle FacilitiesCity of Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Date: 6/22/2017 City Boundary G Line Station Park Existing Facilities Trail Unpaved Trail Sidepath Bike Lane Shared Lane Marking Shoulder 0 0.5 10.25 Miles 17    Barriers to Walking and Bicycling   As part of the 2017 Plan Update process, an online map‐based survey was implemented to gain a better  understanding of important network gaps, physical barriers, and attitudes related to bicycling and  walking in Wheat Ridge. The survey was available from the end of July through the middle of October  and was promoted through a project flyer distributed at community events, through the City’s social  media outlets and webpage, by the Active Transportation Advisory Team (ATAT), and at the project  Open House. A total of 99 people participated.   When asked why it is difficult to walk in Wheat Ridge, survey respondents listed lack of sidewalks (27  percent), sidewalk gaps (16 percent), or traffic speeds (15 percent) as the most common reasons (see  Figure 6). This suggests that completing the sidewalk network and focusing on vehicular speed  reductions can improve the pedestrian experience.   Similarly, traffic speeds were the most commonly cited difficulty for bicyclists (Figure 7). These findings  are consistent with a 2015 ATAT survey that revealed 40 percent of respondents believe that biking or  walking in Wheat Ridge is challenging or in need of improvement.    Figure 6. Summary of Responses to 2016 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Survey Question, “Why is  it Difficult to Walk in Wheat Ridge?”    1 5 6 9 11 15 16 27 No existing trail No painted bike lanes No curb ramps Too much traffic Sidewalk in disrepair Traffic too fast Gaps in the sidewalk No sidewalk Why Is It Difficult to Walk? Sample Comments from Online Survey Respondents “Many of the existing sidewalks in Wheat Ridge are too narrow and will barely accommodate my wife's  walker. She has fallen twice when her walker slipped off the edge of the sidewalks. Also, many bushes and  trees extend out over the sidewalks forcing us to walk in the street.”   “No sidewalk, narrow pavement, traffic moving quickly makes it very unsafe for pedestrians.”  “We bike to the Youngfield trailhead to access the Clear Creek bike path. The route is occasionally difficult  and dangerous for a bike, particularly near the Walmart. On Youngfield, we take the sidewalk because we  don't feel comfortable on the street.”   18    Figure 7. Summary of Responses to 2016 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Survey Question, “Why is  it Difficult to Bike in Wheat Ridge?”      In 2010, the Community Assessment Survey for Older  Adults (CASOA™) conducted a statistically valid survey of  residents age 60 years or older in Wheat Ridge.6 In that  survey, 17 percent of respondents reported that the ease of  walking is excellent, while 50 percent reported it as good.  The remainder (32 percent) reported the ease of walking as  fair or poor, suggesting nearly a third of older Wheat Ridge residents find the walking environment  deficient. Given the high number of older residents in Wheat Ridge, these findings are particularly  noteworthy and were a central focus of this planning process. The report concluded that “the greatest  area of resident need [is] civic engagement.” Improving seniors’ mobility choices will greatly benefit  their ability to get around and access the various social and engagement opportunities offered  throughout the city and region.                                                                       6 Jefferson County. Community Assessment Survey for Older Adults. Accessed Jan 7, 2017. http://jeffco.us/human‐ services/aging‐well‐project/community‐assessment‐survey‐for‐older‐adults/  1 1 5 10 12 13 Not enough lighting Streets do not connect No existing trail Too much traffic No painted bike lanes Traffic too fast Why Is It Difficult to Bike? Making the city walkable and transit‐ friendly is about more than  transportation. It is a way to ensure  people remain connected to the fabric  of their community as they age.   19    CHAPTER 3: BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROGRAMS   An expanded set of bicycle and pedestrian programs, implemented through strong partnerships and  collaboration, will support the vision of Wheat Ridge as a comfortable and safe place to walk and bike  for people of all ages and abilities.   The League of American Bicyclists (LAB) runs a national program to designate cities as Bicycle Friendly  Communities, based on their facilities, levels of biking, and programs. While Wheat Ridge has yet to  apply for designation as a Bicycle Friendly Community, LAB provided an informal assessment of Wheat  Ridge’s status in 2014. Along with engineering‐related recommendations, the assessment identified  opportunities for improvement in the following broad areas:   Strengthening youth‐focused bike education, recreation, and empowerment programs    Bicycle skills classes for adults   Educational messages for all road users   Encouragement programs such as Open Streets events or other bike‐related community  celebrations   Greater promotion of bicycling to boost the local economy   Participation in the Bicycle Friendly Business program   Employing law enforcement officers on bikes   Wayfinding and maps to promote bicycling within the community   Greater engagement of law enforcement on bicycling issues   Increased data collection and reporting    This chapter documents current programs and presents ideas for new and expanded programs related  to education, encouragement, enforcement, and evaluation. The recommendations are informed by the  findings of the LAB assessment as well input from City staff and the community, and are focused on  those that will be most effective at helping achieve the 2017 Plan goals.   Current Programs  The majority of bicycle‐ and pedestrian‐related programming in Wheat Ridge is currently conducted by  the ATAT, an important driving force behind changes in the city related to bicycling and walking. The  “mighty ATATs” (members of the ATAT) strive to build a more inclusive community for all Wheat Ridge  residents and visitors through a variety of education and encouragement programs, highlighted in this  section.   Ride for Reading  The Ride for Reading program is an ATAT program that collects and donates books and bikes around  Wheat Ridge to people of all ages. The program is completely volunteer‐run and brings together  neighbors, businesses, and students. For example, ATAT hosts Saturday events around town at local  businesses and, in exchange for donated books and bikes, people are given bags with coupons and other  swag donated by local businesses. Bicycles donated by businesses and community members are  inventoried, repaired, and stored around the City in volunteers’ homes. When the bikes are given out,  ATAT provides a helmet, lock, and light with each bike along with a safety check. This program is a  positive example of community‐led engagement and should be continued, with greater support from  other community partners as possible.  20    A successful Ride for Reading day (Photo Credit: ATAT)   Community Bike Rides   Community bike rides provide people of all abilities an opportunity to ride together in a safe, social  setting. Currently, ATAT organizes community bike rides to help novice riders navigate the city and reach  their favorite destinations. In the summer, ATAT hosts weekly cruiser rides to connect people who walk  and bike with local businesses. These family friendly cruiser rides are short, slow‐paced and locally‐ focused.   Bike Rodeos    Bike rodeos educate children and provide a safe, fun and encouraging environment for biking. Rodeos  feature bicycle safety skills instruction, bicycle skills practice, equipment inspections, and helmet fitting  for children. Related to this effort, ATAT has participated in community events and offered information,  equipment, and assistance to provide a fun and encouraging environment for biking. Where possible,  bike rodeos and related events should be co‐hosted by elementary schools in Wheat Ridge.      21    New Program Recommendations  To accomplish the Plan’s goals, additional programs and practices may be needed. These additional  activities would build greater support for bicycling and walking, which is needed to bolster bold  infrastructure investments in the future.   Implementing programs through partnerships with community organizations will likely continue to be  the most effective strategy, as nonprofit agencies are often better suited to running education and  encouragement programs than city government. However, there are examples where cities have  initiated programs like those below on their own.   New funding sources (e.g., state, federal or foundation grants) will likely be needed to accomplish these  program recommendations (see Appendix D for a list of potential funding sources). In addition, the City  should work closely with regional partners such as Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG)  and Jefferson County who share similar goals related to active transportation.   Education   The following programs are proposed to enable people of all ages and abilities to develop the skills and  confidence to ride and care for their bikes.   Pedestrian Safety Education Campaign   The City should launch a pedestrian safety education campaign that focuses on both motorists and  pedestrians. Regularly reviewing crash data and adapting the messages to meet the needs will help  improve pedestrian safety.   Example Program: The City of Newark, NJ developed a pedestrian safety‐focused campaign to change  pedestrian and motorist behavior and to reduce the incidence of pedestrian injuries and fatalities on  New Jersey’s roadway. Using the state’s crash and fatality data, the campaign targeted all drivers 20‐49  years of age and all adult pedestrians. Campaign messages were delivered by outdoor advertising, radio,  internet advertising, outreach materials in the street, and social media.   Who: City‐led  Bicycle Mentor Events and Partnerships    Bicycle mentor programs (sometimes called bike buddy programs) partner more experienced bicyclists  with novice riders for daily commutes or recreational rides. Mentorship programs allow people who are  new or novice bike riders to learn more about the bicycle network, rules of the road, and bicycle  etiquette through a peer‐to‐peer, informal social setting. Such rides can happen one‐on‐one or as part  of group rides. Once new riders become more confident, they can mentor new riders.  Example Program: The 511’s Bike Buddy Ridematch service in El Cerrito, CA helps people find other local  bicyclists. As explained on their website, “new bikers will be 'buddied up’ with experienced bicyclists to  gather tips, route information and moral support, while experienced bicyclists can find others to ride  with or novice bicyclists to assist.”7  Who: Community‐led                                                               7 City of El Cerrito California. 511’s Bike Buddy Program. Accessed Mar. 29, 2017.   http://www.el‐cerrito.org/index.aspx?NID=535   22    Bicycle Maintenance Classes    Low‐cost or free bike maintenance classes make it easier for residents with seldom‐used or broken  bicycles to start riding again. Workshops can be held at schools, parks, or multi‐family housing  complexes.  Example Program: Washington State’s Cascade Bicycle Club provides several education classes –  including those related to riding and maintenance – to help community members “build the knowledge,  skills and community support to achieve all your bicycling goals.”8 Their maintenance classes include fix‐ a‐flat; maintenance for every rider; chains and derailleurs; and brakes, wheels and tires. They cost  between $30 and $40, are open to the public, and are easy to find and register for online.   Who: Community‐led  Encouragement  The following programs are proposed to help increase ridership, comfort, and connectivity in Wheat  Ridge.  Encourage Active Commutes within the City of Wheat Ridge    The City of Wheat Ridge and other Wheat Ridge businesses should encourage their employees to walk,  bike, and take transit for daily travel. The City should work to educate people about safe transportation  behaviors, available Transportation Demand Management incentive programs, and opportunities to  become more involved in the culture of walking and biking in Wheat Ridge. There are a variety of ways  to incentivize walking, biking, and transit, including competitions (with transportation or health‐related  prizes), financial incentives, and free transit passes.   Example Program: The City and County of Denver’s employee wellness program includes education  about opportunities for active transportation and wellbeing challenges to incentivize more activity  throughout the day, such as by walking and biking.   Who: City‐led  Create a City Bike Map     City bike maps help people who are new to bicycling or who are less familiar with the routes in an area  to plan their ride. The City should create or partner with Jefferson County to create a bicycle map to  show all routes and highlight the network of comfortable facilities across Wheat Ridge. A map may be  particularly helpful for bicyclists in Wheat Ridge because covering long distances through local streets  often requires the use of indirect routes or navigating offset intersections, which can be confusing.  Online maps using existing platforms are likely to be the easiest and quickest approach for publishing a  bike map for Wheat Ridge. Bike maps work best in conjunction within implementation of a  comprehensive wayfinding system, such as that planned within Jefferson County. Madison, WI and  Austin, TX have exemplary city bike maps.   Who: City‐led with support from Jefferson County  Increase the Online Presence of Walking and Biking in Wheat Ridge   The City could create a homepage for walking and biking on its website. Providing current and easily‐ accessible information about walking and biking including the bike network, new City initiatives, bicycle                                                               8 Cascade Bicycle Club. Adult Classes. Accessed Mar 29, 2017. https://www.cascade.org/learn/adult‐classes  23    parking, and community events will keep residents informed and involved. In addition, the City should  include biking and walking directions to help community members reach city facilities and events.   Example Program: The City of Fort Collins, CO “FC Bikes” program page provides a comprehensive yet  easily‐accessible clearinghouse of information.9 The page includes an overview of bicycle‐related  updates with drop‐down menus highlighting the City’s encouragement and education programs, plans  and projects, and resources.   Who: City‐led  Establish Walking School Buses and Bike Trains   Walking school buses and bike trains are adult‐supervised groups of students walking or biking to school  that can help alleviate parental concerns about personal security and traffic safety. As the Plan’s  engineering recommendations are implemented, walking and biking routes can be created to direct  students to intersections with adequate pedestrian facilities and crossing guards. Walkshed maps for K‐8  schools in Wheat Ridge are provided in Appendix B.   Historically, ATAT has organized a walking school bus to Compass Montessori School and a bike train  from B&F Tire to downtown Denver in 2016. These efforts should be continued and expanded upon  where possible.   Example Program: Portland, Oregon’s Safe Routes to School program includes bike trains at  participating elementary schools.10 One element of their program’s success is building bike trains along  the city’s low‐stress residential neighborhood greenways.    Who: Community and school‐led  Provide Bicycle Parking at Community Events   Provision of high‐capacity bicycle parking at community events can be an effective encouragement  strategy.11 Bicycle parking makes the end‐of‐trip process faster and more convenient, and it provides  visibility and legitimacy for biking. Currently, ATAT volunteers provide bike parking at some community  events. However, a more formalized process would ensure that all major events have adequate parking  to encourage more people arrive by bike.   Example Program: The City of Portland, OR provides temporary event bike parking recommendations,  permits for the use of parking lanes, and contact information for local parking providers within the city.    Who: City‐led  Highlight National Bicycling and Walking Events    The City and community advocacy groups should continue to highlight national bicycle events like  National Bike Month, Bike to Work Day, the National Bike Challenge (see below), International Walk to  School Day, Spare the Air Day, and car‐free commute challenges. These events encourage people to  walk, bike, and take transit in a supportive context, and potentially develop new, sustainable habits.                                                                9 City of Fort Colls. FC Bikes. Accessed Mar 29, 2017. http://www.fcgov.com/bicycling/  10 Safe Routes Campaigns. Bike Train. Accessed Mar 30, 2017. https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/552063   11 The Association of Pedestrian and Bicycle Professionals’ Bicycle Parking Guidelines, 2nd Edition, includes a section on event  bicycle parking. For event parking, the Guidelines provide a discussion of three types of parking ‐‐ valet, attended (self‐park),  and unattended ‐‐ and recommendations for suitable rack types.  24    Example Program: The City of Boulder, Colorado’s Walk & Bike Month began as a single day of bicycling  events in 1977 and has grown to a month‐long celebration of Boulder’s active transportation culture.12  Walk & Bike Month includes a diverse list of more than more than 60 free events for people of all ages,  including mountain bike rides, running activities, scavenger hunts, historical walking tours, hikes, and  more.13 Bike to Work Day in June is the main event, with almost 50 breakfast stations around Boulder  serving free food and drink to the estimated 7,000 participants riding or walking to work.   Walk & Bike Month is sponsored by the City of Boulder and Community Cycles, a local nonprofit that  educates and advocates for safe bicycle use, who coordinates activities and volunteers during the  month. The month culminates in Bike to Work Day with more than 60 breakfast and bike service stations  around the city.14   Who: City‐led with community support                                                                    12 Bike and Walk Month. About Boulder Walk & Bike Month. Accessed Mar. 29, 2017.  http://www.walkandbikemonth.org/about/  13 Ibid.   14 Bike and Walk Month. Bike to Work Day. Accessed Mar. 29, 2017. http://www.walkandbikemonth.org/events/bike‐to‐work‐ day/  National Bike Challenge encouragement sponsored by the ATAT  (Photo Credit: ATAT)  25        Enforcement  The following programs are proposed to increase safety for people walking and biking. However,  enforcement programs require a commitment of resources from the Wheat Ridge Police Department  (WRPD). As resources are limited, this Plan recognizes that infrastructure design is likely to be the most  effective way to encourage and ensure safe behavior on the part of motorists, bicyclists, and  pedestrians. High quality sidewalks, crosswalks, and bicycle facilities should be designed and  constructed so that safe and legal use of these facilities is convenient for people walking and biking.  Nonetheless, targeted enforcement efforts help encourage civility on public streets.   Improve Enforcement Trainings    Provide regular education about holistic enforcement of traffic laws, including the rights and  responsibilities specific to bicyclists and pedestrians, for all officers who conduct enforcement. Consider  similar trainings for school bus drivers.   Example Program: In Fort Collins, CO, the 2011 Bicycle Safety Education Plan recommended that Fort  Collins Police Services provide with training for officers to help them understand typical behaviors, as  well as rights and responsibilities of bicyclists on the road.15 Currently, Police Services offers a two‐hour  course on these topics every two years, which is required of all new recruits and optional for others.  Additionally, Police Services provides officer education every spring and fall regarding rules of the road  and how to cite bicycle infractions.   Who: WRPD‐led  Position Speed Feedback Trailers as Needed    As speeding was a top issue cited by community members during this process, the City should work to  address vehicular speeds through enforcement and education. One potential solution to mitigate  vehicular speeding is to use portable speed feedback trailers to make drivers more aware of their actual  speeds.   Example Program: The City and County of Denver uses smart trailers, portable driver feedback signs  (“your speed is…”), and a stealth system (involving small boxes temporarily attached to poles) to collect  speed data. The stealth stat monitors volume and 85th percentile speed and has been used to monitor  speeds before and after installation of a photo radar system. These are also used on streets where  public works has had difficulty in collecting speed data. All three tools help Denver to dynamically  address speeding issues as they can be repositioned throughout the city.  Who: WRPD‐led  Evaluation   The following programs are proposed to collect valuable feedback to ensure an effective use of public  resources. While national guidance and best practices should be used where possible, collecting data  specific to Wheat Ridge can create a compelling and credible story to support future efforts.                                                                 15 State of Bicycling in Fort Collins. August 2014.  http://www.fcgov.com/bicycling/pdf/appendix_b_state_of_bicycling_in_fort_collins.pdf?1416526711  26    Develop a Strategy for Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting  Wheat Ridge’s current bicycle and pedestrian count data comes from manual counts conducted by  volunteers. A routine counting program would help the City evaluate ridership trends and make the case  for future investments in active transportation infrastructure. The City should conduct pre‐ and post‐ data collection for new bicycle infrastructure projects to determine the effect of different investment  decisions. Behavioral observations, such as compliance with signals or jaywalking can also be performed  along with volume data collection.   Example Program: The Colorado Department of Transportation completed a Non‐Motorized Count  Strategic Plan in 2016 to outline strategies for collecting counts of pedestrians and bicyclists, including  counter technologies, location types, data management, and resource needs.    Who: City‐led  Analyze Crash Data on a Periodic Basis     Bicycle and pedestrian crash data is collected by Wheat Ridge Police Department and other law  enforcement agencies that respond to crashes in Wheat Ridge. Periodic analysis of this data may reveal  opportunities for implementing safety projects to reduce pedestrian and bicycle crashes and increase  comfort. In particular, the City should review crashes at locations with higher concentrations of crashes  as well as contributing factors common throughout the City.   Example Program: The City and County of Denver has conducted pedestrian and bicycle crash studies  and is now developing a Vision Zero Action Plan that will include strategies to reduce fatalities and  serious injuries throughout the city, but especially along high injury corridors.   Who: City‐led     27    CHAPTER 4: PEDESTRIAN ELEMENT  Introduction  Walking is the most basic and universal form of transportation, yet the needs of pedestrians are often  overlooked or considered after those of other modes of transportation. Pedestrians are also the most  vulnerable transportation system users. For example, 25 percent of crashes involving a pedestrian in  Wheat Ridge from 2011 to 2013 resulted in a serious injury, compared to only 2 percent of all crashes.    Designing a transportation system that works well for pedestrians requires slowing vehicles and  providing comfortable walking environments through separation from traffic, thoughtful intersection  design, pedestrian amenities, and seamless integration with destinations, including transit facilities. As a  community with a high percentage of seniors, many of whom do not or eventually will not drive,  providing comfortable and convenient walking facilities is extremely important for Wheat Ridge.16  Additionally, Wheat Ridge has a relatively high percentage of commuters who use transit. Transit users  are an important target audience for pedestrian improvements since they often walk to access transit.  Figure 8 shows the combined level of transit and walking as a percentage of all commute trips, across  several geographic areas within Colorado. Although lower than Denver and Golden, the combined  transit and walk mode share is higher in Wheat Ridge than in many other cities in the west Denver  metro area (Figure 8).   Figure 8. Combined Walk and Transit Commute Mode Share for Nearby Cities, 2011‐201517      In this section of the plan, options for improving the pedestrian environment are provided. A Pedestrian  Facility Toolbox, with treatments suitable for implementation in Wheat Ridge, is first presented. The  toolbox includes implementation considerations for pedestrian routes and intersections. These include  sidewalks, paths, pedestrian signals, crosswalk markings, and traffic calming measures. Some of the  recommendations will also improve conditions for bicyclists. To focus Wheat Ridge’s future  implementation efforts on the areas with the greatest need, priority pedestrian routes were also  identified. Finally, policy and project recommendations and proposed.                                                                  16 This Plan incorporates the ADA Transition Plan’s recommendations for improved accessibility and compliance related to  walking, especially pertinent for seniors who use mobility devices.    17 US Census. American Fact Finder. 2011‐2015 American Community Survey 5‐Year Estimates.  11.6% 11.3% 6.8% 6.2% 6.1% 5.6% 5.0% 4.8% 3.8% Golden Denver Wheat Ridge Lakewood Colorado Westminster Broomfield Jefferson County Arvada 28    Pedestrian Facilities Toolbox    Sidewalks   Sidewalks are the most common type of  pedestrian facility. They play a critical role in the  function, enjoyment, and accessibility of  neighborhoods, main streets, and other  community destinations. They also provide a  dedicated space with the primary purpose of  accommodating pedestrian travel. In most areas,  sidewalks constitute the majority of the pedestrian  network. Key considerations related to the  comfort of sidewalks include:    Width: Sidewalks less than 5 feet wide do  not allow people to comfortably walk  side‐by‐side. Wider sidewalks are needed  in areas with high pedestrian traffic or  high traffic volumes or speed. In locations  where a significant portion of bicyclists  are likely to ride on the sidewalk instead of on the street, a sidepath may be constructed  instead of a sidewalk to provide adequate space for pedestrians and bicyclists.18   Horizontal separation from traffic: On streets with higher speeds or volumes, a buffer should  be provided between the sidewalks and traffic.   Vertical barrier between sidewalk and traffic:  Street trees, light poles, on‐street parking, or  other vertical barriers provide a sense of enclosure and separation for pedestrians.    Shade: Street trees, awnings, or other shade features create a more comfortable walking  environment in the summer months.   Other Features: Benches, lighting, trash cans, wayfinding, and similar features provide a  necessary service to pedestrians throughout their journey. They are particularly important  around bus stops.                                                                      18 The Shared‐Use Path Level of Service Calculator (2006) and the American Association of State and Highway Transportation  Officials (AASHTO) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities should be referenced for shared use path design guidance.   Urban and suburban neighborhoods often have 5‐foot  sidewalks. It is preferable to have a wide terrace between  the curb and the sidewalk to separate pedestrians from the  road and to provide room for street trees, utility poles, and  other furnishings.  “I walk twice/week to the Walmart /King Soopers center for groceries, lunch, etc. Along my 0.2 mile route, I  have to push my child's stroller onto the street three times because of poor sidewalks or no sidewalks. There  are many folks who walk this route, pushing grocery utility carts, strollers, walkers.”    – Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Survey Respondent  29    Curbless Streets  Many of Wheat Ridge’s original developments did not include sidewalks, but rather were built with  curbless streets and adjacent ditches. This characteristic street type remains prominent today and  widespread construction of sidewalks on such streets is neither feasible (from a financial standpoint) or  desirable to many Wheat Ridge residents. Although sidewalks are the best way to provide separation  from motor vehicles, curbless streets can work well in a residential setting with low levels of vehicle  traffic. This condition is most appropriate for streets that serve short, local trips.   Engineering treatments are needed on curbless streets to ensure that vehicle speeds are appropriate for  interaction with pedestrians and bicyclists. If motorists drive too fast on shared streets, the streets will  not only be unsafe, but they will discourage people from walking or biking there. Several treatments can  be employed to increase comfort for all street users. In many cases, a combination of treatments should  be applied together in order to achieve the best outcome.         Striped Shoulder/Pedestrian Lane  On streets with adequate width, striping a shoulder  where pedestrians can walk, provides a dedicated  space and visual narrowing of the roadway that may  encourage drivers to slow down. This treatment has  been implemented on Miller Street, north of 44th  Avenue.       Advisory Shoulder  Similar to a striped shoulder, advisory shoulders  create a dedicated space for pedestrians or bicyclists,  but allow motorists to cross the dashed shoulder  marking when pedestrians and bicyclists are not  present, in order to pass an oncoming vehicle. They  may be useful on streets without adequate width to  accommodate a striped shoulder. As a relatively new  treatment type in the US, advisory shoulders should  be accompanied by education and signage to ensure  that they are understood by the public. They also  require an approved Request to Experiment from the  Federal Highway Administration.19                                                                     19 Federal Highway Administration. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices: Experimentations.  https://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/condexper.htm  30    Traffic Calming  Traffic calming is the use of physical engineering measures that change the design of streets to reduce  speeds, alter driver behavior, and improve conditions for non‐motorized street users. Traffic calming  aims to slow the speeds of motorists to a “desired speed” (usually 20 miles per hour [mph] or less for  residential streets and 25 to 35 mph for collectors and minor arterials). The greatest benefit of traffic  calming is increased safety and comfort for all users, including drivers and people trying to cross the  street.   Traffic calming is essential to creating a comfortable, multimodal environment. Vertical treatments such  as speed humps, speed cushions, raised crossings, and other similar measures force drivers to slow  down. Horizontal treatments such as chicanes have a similar effect. Although not exclusive to curbless  streets, they can be used effectively in that context to reduce speeding.  Wheat Ridge has an existing Neighborhood Traffic Management Program, which includes criteria for  installation of speed humps and speed radar boards.20 This program creates a strong foundation for  implementation of traffic calming in Wheat Ridge, but could be expanded to address a broader range of  strategies. Additionally, as the current policy relies on residents to raise concerns, a more proactive  approach to traffic calming is needed to promote safe walking and bicycling in Wheat Ridge.                                                                    20 City of Wheat Ridge. Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (4‐28‐14). Accessed March 20, 2017.  http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/DocumentCenter/View/160   31    Figure 9. Traffic Calming Examples    Speed Cushion Speed Hump Traffic Circle  Chicanes  Chicane with On‐Street Parking  Median Gateway 32    Intersections and Midblock Crossings  Intersections and midblock crossings are a natural point of conflict between all street users. Through  careful design, many of the inherent conflicts associated with these locations can be addressed. In this  section, treatment options that increase pedestrian safety, comfort, and convenience at intersections  and midblock crossings are presented.       High‐Visibility Crosswalks  Crosswalks marked with continental, ladder, or  zebra patterns have been found to be significantly  more visible to motorists21 and to reduce crashes by  48 percent.22 High‐visibility crosswalks are  especially beneficial on multi‐lane streets in  conjunction with additional countermeasures, such  as median refuge islands and rectangular rapid flash  beacons. Crosswalks must be a minimum of 6 feet  wide, or the full width of the connecting sidewalk or  sidepath, whichever is wider.     Advance Yield Lines   Advance yield lines, which are composed of solid  white triangles (often referred to as “shark’s  teeth”), indicate where drivers should yield to  pedestrians in crosswalks. They allow pedestrians  to be more easily seen by advancing drivers, whose  view might otherwise be blocked by a vehicle in the  adjacent lane. When applied to midblock  crosswalks, advance yield lines should be 20 to 50  feet from the crosswalk. Wheat Ridge has installed  advance yield lines on West 44th Avenue at Robb  Street.                                                                    21 K. Fitzpatrick, S. Chrysler, V. Iragavarapu, and E.S. Park. Detection Distances to Crosswalk Markings: Transverse Lines,  Continental Markings, and Bar Pairs. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2250.  Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2011.  22 L. Chen, C. Chen, R. Ewing, C. McKnight, R. Srinivasan, and M. Roe. Safety Countermeasures and Crash Reduction in New York  City—Experience and Lessons Learned. Accident Analysis and Prevention. In print, 2012. Retrieved August 14, 2015.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.009  33    Median Refuge Island  Median refuge islands provide space in the middle of  intersections or midblock crossings for pedestrians to  wait and look for oncoming traffic. They make  crossings easier for pedestrians by providing a refuge  area for people crossing the street to wait, rest, or  look for oncoming motorists. Median islands should  be a minimum of six feet in width, which allows for  people using wheelchairs, strollers and bicycles to  use them comfortably. Medians also have a traffic  calming benefit and limit vehicle turning conflicts.       Curb Extension  Curb extensions or “bulbouts” extend the sidewalk  into the parking lane of a street to narrow the  roadway, slow traffic, increase visibility of  pedestrians, and reduce the distance of the street  crossing. Curb extensions can be used at  intersections or mid‐block crossings. Additionally,  curb extensions can be planted with trees or other  landscaping.       Pedestrian Countdown Timer   Countdown timers added to pedestrian signals  inform pedestrians of the amount of time remaining  before the solid “DON’T WALK” phase of the signal  cycle. This tool increases compliance by discouraging  pedestrians from beginning to cross near the end of  the cycle. Reduced crash rates and delays can be  realized through the installation of countdown  signals.  34    Leading Pedestrian Interval   Traditional signal timing often results in pedestrian  signals entering the “WALK” phase at the same time  turning traffic is given the green arrow or straight‐ through traffic is given the green light, allowing right‐ turning traffic to enter the crosswalk. This creates  conflicts between pedestrians in the crosswalk and  turning motorists who either do not see the  pedestrian or believe they can pass through the  intersection before the pedestrian arrives at the  conflict point.  Leading pedestrian intervals (LPIs) start the “WALK”  phase three to ten seconds before motor vehicle  traffic is allowed to proceed, allowing pedestrians to  enter the crosswalk before turning motor vehicles  begin moving through the intersection. LPIs may reduce crashes by as much as 60 percent.23  Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon  Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons (RRFBs) are user‐actuated systems that supplement warning signs at  unsignalized crossing locations. When a pedestrian triggers the system, the lights flash rapidly, drawing  attention to the warning sign and the presence of a pedestrian. RRFBs are only active when triggered by  a pedestrian either actively (i.e., push button) or passively (i.e., sensor). They cost less than full signals  and have been shown to increase driver yielding.24   RRFBs work best in  conjunction with a  median refuge island.  In such cases, a beacon  can be placed in the  median, which  enhances the visibility  of the crossing  significantly. This is  particularly important  for streets with four or  more lanes, as the distance between beacons increases. RRFBs on four lane roads should also be paired  with advanced yield lines to reduce the likelihood of multiple threat crashes, which are not solved by the  presence of an RRFB. A multiple threat crash involves a driver stopping in one lane of a multilane road to  permit pedestrians to cross while an oncoming vehicle (in the same direction) fails to see or yield to the  pedestrian who is crossing.                                                                23 A.C. Fayish and Frank Gross. Safety effectiveness of leading pedestrian intervals evaluated by a before–after study with  comparison groups. Transportation Research Record No. 2198 (2010): 15–22.  24 Federal Highway Administration. Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacon. May 2009.   https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/conventional/unsignalized/tech_sum/fhwasa09009/fhwasa09009.pdf   35    High‐Intensity Activated Crosswalk Beacon   The High‐intensity Activated Crosswalk Beacon (HAWK) is a type of signal intended to allow pedestrians  and bicyclists to stop traffic to cross high‐volume arterial streets. This type of signal may be used in lieu  of a full signal or at locations which do not meet traffic signal warrants, but where assistance is needed  for pedestrians or bicyclists to cross a high‐volume street. HAWK signals should be considered for all trail  crossings if other engineering measures are found inadequate to create safe crossings.   There are currently no HAWK signals in Wheat Ridge; however, they may be justified on Sheridan  Boulevard, Wadsworth Boulevard, Kipling Street, 44th Avenue, or 38th Avenue. Midblock or  unsignalized intersection locations with frequent pedestrian crossings along these streets are good  candidates for HAWK signal installation due to high traffic volumes, speed, and number of lanes.     Curb Ramps  Curb ramps provide a transition between sidewalks  and crosswalks and must be installed at all intersection  and midblock pedestrian crossings, as mandated by  federal legislation. They allow people using  wheelchairs, strollers, walkers, crutches, handcarts,  bicycles, or who have mobility restrictions to more  easily navigate the city. They also serve a wayfinding  function for visually impaired pedestrians. Curb ramps  should be installed at each intersection and midblock  crossing throughout Wheat Ridge. These must include  detectible warning surfaces (such as the yellow,  bumpy pad in the photo at right, also known as a  truncated dome).  Wheat Ridge is currently developing an ADA Transition  Plan, which provides more detailed information  regarding the highest priorities for implementation of  curb ramps. From the standpoint of enhancing  mobility throughout the community, curb ramps along priority pedestrian routes should be considered  for replacement to achieve compliance with national guidance. Additionally, curb ramps should always  be evaluated and updated as needed during resurfacing projects.    Priority Pedestrian Routes  Most pedestrian trips are less than a mile in length and are focused around activity centers and in  compact neighborhoods where destinations are close together. This Plan’s analysis of pedestrian needs  and identification of priority routes is based on input from the public received through the project online  interactive map, open house, and the Ridgefest event. It also reflects input from the ATAT, which  identified high priority pedestrian routes for consideration by the project team (Appendix C).        36    The route identification process began with a GIS‐based demand analysis that incorporated the  following spatial data:   RTD G Line Stations and Bus Stops   Schools   City and Regional Parks   Destinations identified by the public through the Online Map‐Based Survey or public events   Other destinations used to develop routes in the 2016 JeffCo [Jefferson County] Regional  Bikeways Wayfinding Guide, a multijurisdictional study recently completed in Jefferson County.    Based on these datasets, a demand map was developed to identify areas with the greatest potential for  walk trips (Figure 10). In addition to the demand map, consideration was given to the priority pedestrian  routes provided by ATAT to the project team. The ATAT map divided routes into two tiers indicating  higher and lower priorities.   Building from the demand map and preliminary recommended routes, the project team developed a  refined set of corridors that are recommended as priority pedestrian routes (Figure 11). These corridors  were carefully selected to connect people to important destinations and result in a well‐connected and  comprehensive pedestrian network. In general, the routes follow major streets, as they are the most  likely to serve a higher volume of pedestrians and provide direct access to destinations. However,  additional routes that feed into the Clear Creek Trail, connect directly to schools, or provide a high  degree of connectivity are also included.   The City recognizes that these are not the only places where people walk, or the only places that need  investment to improve walkability. As previously noted, people often walk on residential streets that  lack sidewalks, and in some cases this works fine for most people, but in other cases sidewalks,  crosswalks, or other improvements may be needed.    Recommendations for Priority Pedestrian Routes   The identified pedestrian routes should be considered as the highest priority for implementation of  pedestrian facilities. The following guidelines for implementation should be applied to the priority  pedestrian routes to improve conditions for people who walk:   Infrastructure    Sidewalks ‐ Implement sidewalks on both sides of the street and fill high‐priority sidewalk gaps  along arterials. In some cases, these gaps overlap with gaps in the bicycle network and, as a  result, sidepaths are recommended to serve both user groups. Recommended sidewalk projects  are listed in Table 4 and 6 of ‘Chapter 6, Implementation.’   Curb ramps ‐ Prioritize installation of curb ramps along priority routes, especially near transit  stops or other priority destinations identified in the ADA Transition Plan.   Transit amenities ‐ Provide bus shelters and other amenities to increase the convenience and  comfort of pedestrians waiting for the bus.  Increased Separation   Separation ‐ Provide separation from traffic through landscaped buffers and/or on‐street  parking.  37     Residential streets ‐ Implement striped shoulders on residential streets within the pedestrian  priority route network where adequate width exists. For narrow streets, explore the use of  advisory shoulders.   Crossings    Frequent crossings ‐ Implement designated pedestrian crossings at regular intervals (target:  approximately every 500 feet).     Pedestrian‐focused crossings ‐ Ensure crossings at signals and midblock locations adhere to best  practice guidance.   Speed Management   Signal timing ‐ Implement traffic signal timing modifications to support desired operating  speeds of 30 mph or less, where applicable.   School zones ‐ Proactively implement engineering measures to reduce speeds in school zones.     Traffic calming on residential streets ‐ Pilot traffic calming measures on residential streets  within the pedestrian priority route network, evaluating outcomes such as vehicle speed,  pedestrian and bicycle usage, and resident satisfaction.  Citywide Pedestrian Recommendations  The following pedestrian improvement strategies are intended to improve conditions for pedestrians  across Wheat Ridge:   Programs and Policies   Expand the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Management Program to include other treatments such  as chicanes, neighborhood traffic circles, speed cushions, and gateway treatments.    Develop pedestrian crossing guidelines for arterials, including location criteria and treatment  selection.   Crossing Improvements   Pedestrian signals ‐ Upgrade pedestrian signals to include countdown timers where they are not  currently installed. Implement LPIs at locations with a high volume of pedestrians or turning  conflicts.   Advanced stop lines ‐ Add advanced stop lines to existing midblock crossings on multi‐lane  streets where not currently installed.    Enhance pedestrian crossings ‐ Evaluate opportunities to implement HAWK signals on arterials  such as Sheridan Boulevard, Wadsworth Boulevard, Kipling Street, 44th Avenue, or 38th Avenue.     School Walksheds  In addition to priority pedestrian routes, the project team created a series of maps to identify potential  locations for implementation of school‐related infrastructure improvements (Appendix B). These maps  highlight the areas that are accessible to the school within a half‐mile walk, based on the existing street  network and trail system. Opportunities to increase levels of walking to school through construction of  sidewalks or trails may exist where there are significant differences between the walking distance and  straight‐line distance.         BOYD'SCROSSINGPARKBAUGH PARK APEL-BACHERPARK HOPPERHOLLOW PARKPROSPECTPARKANDERSONPARKHAPPINESSGARDENSPARKRANDALL PARKTOWNCENTERWHEAT RIDGERECREATIONCENTERLOUISETURNER PARK COMMUNITYCENTER PANORAMAPARKLEWISMEADOWS PARK STITESPARKHAYWARDPARK RICHARDS-HARTESTATE MANWARINGATHLETICFIELD PARAMOUNTPARK FRUITDALEPARK YE OLDEFIREHOUSE 37TH &UPHAMPARKDISCOVERYPARK CROWN HILLLAKE PARK West 32nd Avenue West 38th Avenue West 44th Avenue Ralston Road West 48thAvenue Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t West 58th Avenue K i p l i n g P a r k w a y Wa r d R o a d Sh e r i d a n B o u l e v a r d Ki p l i n g S t r e e t W a d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d W a d s w o r t h B y p a s s West 46th Avenue West 26th Avenue Pa r f e t S t r e e t West 44th Avenue Lo w e l l B o u l e v a r d West 56th Avenue West 27th Avenue Te l l e r S t r e e t Ridge Road Grandview Avenue Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t Y a r r o w S t r e e t West 58th Avenue West 17th Avenue West 20th Avenue West 52nd Avenue B r o oks D r i v e West 32nd Avenue Fi e l d S t r e e t West 48th Avenue Ha r l a n S t r e e t Ol d e W a d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d We st 38th Avenue West 23rd Avenue Ca r r S t r e e t Te n n y s o n S t r e e t We s t 5 0 t h A v e n u e West 29th Avenue L u t h e r a n P a r k w a y West 41st Avenue West 57th Avenue Ro b b S t r e e t Mil l e r S t r e e t Q u a i l S t r e e t West 55th Avenue West 54th Avenue West 25th Avenue Al k i r e S t r e e t D e n v e r W e s t P a r k w a y T a b l e MountainParkway North Interstate Highway 70 S ervice R o a d North Interstate Highway 7 0 F r o n t a ge R o a d Pi e r c e S t r e e t West 35th Avenue West 60th Avenue I n d e p e n d e n c e S tr e e t Oa k S t r e e t Wa r d R o a d Eld r i d g e S t r e e t La m a r S t r e e t M a r s h a l l S t r e e t Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Ta b o r S t r e e t Pe r r y S t r e e t Ga r r i s o n S t r e e t Du d l e y S t r e e t Al l i s o n S t r e e t Si m m s S t r e e t Figure 10. Pedestrian Priority AreasCity of Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Date: 5/23/2017 0 0.5 10.25 Miles Pedestrian Priority Low High JOHNSONPARK WR HISTORICALPARK BOYD'SCROSSINGPARKBAUGHPARK APEL-BACHERPARK HOPPERHOLLOW PARKPROSPECTPARKANDERSONPARKHAPPINESSGARDENSPARK RANDALLPARKTOWNCENTERWHEAT RIDGERECREATIONCENTER LOUISETURNER PARK COMMUNITYCENTER PANORAMA PARKLEWISMEADOWSPARK STITESPARKHAYWARDPARK RICHARDS-HARTESTATE MANWARINGATHLETICFIELD PARAMOUNTPARK FRUITDALEPARK YE OLDEFIREHOUSE 37TH& UPHAMPARKDISCOVERYPARK CROWN HILLLAKE PARK West 32nd Avenue West 38th Avenue West 44th Avenue Ralston Road West 48thAvenue Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t West 58th Avenue K i p l i n g P a r k w a y Wa r d R o a d Sh e r i d a n B o u l e v a r d Ki p l i n g S t r e e t W a d s w o r t h B y p a s s Wa d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d West 46th Avenue West 26th Avenue Pa r f e t S t r e e t West 44th Avenue Lo w e l l B o u l e v a r d West 56th Avenue West 27th Avenue Te l l e r S t r e e t Ridge Road Grandview Avenue Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t Y a r r o w S t r e e t West 58th Avenue West 17th Avenue West 20th Avenue West 52nd Avenue B r o oks D r i v e West 32nd Avenue Fi e l d S t r e e t W e s t 48th Avenue Ha r l a n S t r e e t Ol d e W a d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d W est 38th Avenue West 23rd Avenue Ca r r S t r e e t L u t h e r a n P a r k w a y Te n n y s o n S t r e e t We s t 5 0 t h A v e n u e West 29th Avenue West 41st Avenue West 57th Avenue Ro b b S t r e e t Mil l e r S t r e e t Q u a i l S t r e e t West 55th Avenue West 54th Avenue West 25th Avenue Al k i r e S t r e e t D e n v e r W e s t P a r k w a y T a b l e MountainParkway North Interstate Highway 70 S ervice R o a d North Interstate Highway 7 0 Fr o n t a g e R o a d Pi e r c e S t r e e t West 35th Avenue West 60th Avenue I n d e p e n d e n c e S tr e e t Oa k S t r e e t Wa r d R o a d Eld r i d g e S t r e e t La m a r S t r e e t M a r s h a l l S t r e e t Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Ta b o r S t r e e t Pe r r y S t r e e t Ga r r i s o n S t r e e t Du d l e y S t r e e t Al l i s o n S t r e e t Si m m s S t r e e t Figure 11. Proposed Pedestrian RoutesCity of Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Date: 6/22/2017 City Boundary G Line Station Park Existing Trail Proposed Facility on Priority Route Existing Facility on Priority Route 0 0.5 10.25 Miles 40    CHAPTER 5: BICYCLE ELEMENT  Introduction  Wheat Ridge has made substantial progress implementing bicycle facilities since the adoption of the  2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Many of the “quick wins,” such as existing roadway shoulders  that can easily be striped as bike lanes, have already been achieved. However, through implementation  of trail connections, sidepaths along major streets, bike lanes, shared streets, and wayfinding, a well‐ connected, comfortable bicycle network can be developed.   In this section of the plan, a Bicycle Facilities Toolbox is included to provide context and implementation  considerations for treatments that may be appropriate for implementation in Wheat Ridge. Additionally,  a comprehensive network map with recommended projects is provided.   Bicycle Facilities Toolbox  The Plan’s bicycle infrastructure recommendations are categorized into four broad categories: paved  trails, sidepaths and separated bike lanes, bike lanes, and shared streets. Some of these facility types  include variations, such as the addition of a striped buffer to a standard bike lane. Variations and  optional treatments are described in more detail in this section of the plan.  Paved Trail  A paved trail or shared use path is an off‐street  bicycle and pedestrian facility that is physically  separated from motor vehicle traffic. Typically,  shared use paths are located in parks, stream valley  greenways, along a utility corridor, or along  abandoned railroad corridors. Shared use paths are  for bicyclists, pedestrians, skaters, wheelchair users,  and other non‐motorized users. They are typically  constructed of concrete or asphalt and play an  important role in the overall bike network.     Design Criteria   Minimum width: 10 feet       Preferred Width: 10‐12 feet    References and Resources   American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for the  Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012)    National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide  (2012)   Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTD) (2009)      41    Sidepath  A sidepath is a shared use path located adjacent to a  street. It is designed for two‐way use by bicyclists  and pedestrians. Sidepaths are sometimes created by  designating a wide sidewalk for shared use, or they  may be a segment of a longer path system. The use  of sidepaths should be limited to roadways with  limited points of conflict at intersections and  driveways. Special consideration should be given to  traffic control where sidepaths pass through  signalized intersections. Designating a narrow  sidewalk as a sidepath without making improvements  to accommodate a mixture of bike and pedestrian traffic is not recommended.    Design Criteria   Minimum width: 10 feet       Preferred Width: 12‐14 feet    References and Resources   AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012)    NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012)    Separated Bike Lane  A separated bike lane, sometimes called a cycle track,  is a bicycle facility that is physically separated from  both the street and the sidewalk. A separated bike  lane may be constructed at street level using street  space, or at the sidewalk level using space adjacent  to the street. Separated bike lanes isolate bicyclists  from motor vehicle traffic using a variety of methods,  including curbs, raised concrete medians, bollards,  on‐street parking, large planting pots/boxes,  landscaped buffers, or other methods.   Separated bike lanes designed to be level with the  sidewalk should provide a vertical separation between bicyclists and pedestrians, or different surface  treatments to delineate the bicycle space from the pedestrian space (such as asphalt versus concrete).     The provision of separated bike lanes should consider the design and function of intersections, which  may require adjustments to signal timing and phasing and/or modifications to pavement and curb  sections.        42    Design Criteria   Minimum width: 5 feet (one‐way facility); 8 feet (bi‐directional facility)   Preferred width: 6.5 feet (one‐way facility) allows for same‐direction passing; 10+ feet (bi‐ directional facility)    References and Resources   Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide (2015)   NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012)   Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Separated Bike Lane Planning and  Design Guide (2015)    Bike Lane  Bike lanes use pavement markings to designate a  portion of a street for the preferential or exclusive  use of bicycles. Bike lane markings are sometimes  dashed where vehicles are allowed to cross the bike  lane, such as for right turns or at driveway crossings.  Bike lanes are best suited for two‐way local and  collector streets where there is enough width to  accommodate a bike lane in both directions, and on  one‐way streets where there is enough width for a  single bike lane.    Design Criteria   Minimum Width: 4 feet exclusive of gutter, 5 feet next to parked cars     Preferred Width: 5 feet exclusive of gutter, 6+ feet next to parked cars    References and Resources   AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012)    NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012)   Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (2009)    Buffered Bike Lane  Buffered bike lanes are created by striping a buffer  zone between a bike lane and the adjacent travel  lane. Some buffered bike lanes also offer a painted  buffer between the bike lane and an adjacent parking  lane. Buffered bike lanes should be considered at  locations where there is excess pavement width or  where adjacent motor vehicle traffic speeds exceed  35 mph.  43    Design Criteria   Minimum width: See bike lane minima; 2 feet for buffer adjacent to traffic         Preferred Width: See bike lane minima; 3‐4 feet for buffer adjacent to traffic   References and Resources   FHWA Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide (2015)   NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012)    Shared Lane Markings  Shared lane markings (also known as “sharrows”) are  used on streets where bicyclists and motor vehicles  share the same travel lane. They may be used to  designate a preferred route for bicyclists where there  is not sufficient width for bike lanes. The sharrow  indicates to bicyclists the most appropriate location  to ride. It also provides a visual cue to motorists that  bicyclists may be present and have a right to use the  street. Sharrows should be placed at least 4 feet (on  center) from the face of curb where on‐street parking  is prohibited, or at least 11 feet (on center) from the face of curb where on‐street parking is allowed.  Sharrows should be used only on low‐volume, low‐speed streets and are not appropriate on streets with  speed limits greater than 35 mph.     Design Criteria   Preferred on streets with posted speed limits of up to 25 mph and traffic volumes of less than  4,000 vehicles per day. Maximum posted speed of street: 35 mph   The marking’s centerline must be minimum 4’ from curb where parking is prohibited.   The marking’s centerline must be minimum 11’ from curb where parking is permitted, so that it  is outside the door zone of parked vehicles.    For narrow lanes, it may be desirable to center shared lane markings along the centerline of the  outside travel lane.  References and Resources   AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (2012)    NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012)   MUTCD (2009)  44    Neighborhood Bikeway  A neighborhood bikeway is a street with low motorized  traffic volumes and low speeds intended to provide  priority to bicyclists and neighborhood motor vehicle  traffic. Neighborhood bikeways may simply have signs  and shared lane markings, or may include traffic  calming elements consisting of speed humps, traffic  circles, chicanes, or traffic diverters.     Design Criteria   Maximum Average Daily Traffic (ADT): 3,000   Preferred ADT: up to 1,000   Target motorist speeds are typically around 20 mph   Speed differential between bicyclists and vehicles less than 15 mph  References & Resources   NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide (2012)  Bicycle Network Development  The plan vision and goals served as the overarching framework for development of bicycle network  recommendations. The network, containing both recommended facility locations and types, was crafted  to meet the following Plan goals:    Complete a connected network of low‐stress bicycle facilities.    Improve intermodal connections, especially access to transit.    Increase access to the region’s parks, major destinations, and recreational opportunities.    Create a plan that is implementable and sensitive to the Wheat Ridge context.   Constraints  While Wheat Ridge has substantial opportunities for promoting and increasing bicycling, significant  challenges also exist. Foremost among these is that few streets provide connectivity over long distances.  Opportunities for east‐west connectivity are particularly constrained.  The recommended bicycle  network proposes connections using low‐stress neighborhood streets, but these routes are less direct  than the city’s arterials.     Similarly, the Rocky Mountain Ditch, Lena Gulch, and connections through Lutheran Hospital would  significantly improve overall connectivity, but development of bicycle facilities through these properties  is not viable at this time. Connectivity to the Clear Creek Trail is another substantial challenge,  particularly west of Kipling Street, where the topography is steep and much of the adjacent land has  been developed and occupied.     While the 2017 Plan is focused on shorter‐term, feasible recommendations, opportunities to address  significant connectivity gaps should be explored over the long‐term. As attitudes toward bicycling  change over time, tackling these barriers may become more realistic.    45    Network Development Process  With consideration of the goals and constraints outlined above, the project team began developing the  2017 network recommendations by reviewing the proposed facilities from the City’s previous Bicycle  and Pedestrian Master Plan. These facilities (both location and type) were compared to the input  received throughout the planning process and consideration of best practices, which have evolved over  the last several years. Some facility recommendations were removed, or the facility type  recommendation was modified to better fit the plan goals of developing a connected network of low‐ stress bicycle facilities.   Information reviewed and incorporated into the network development process includes:    Existing and proposed bicycle network data provided by the City.   Input received from the TAC, City staff, and the public at the October open house.   Key activity areas and transit hubs within the City (as noted by the public, the TAC, and the City).   Information regarding planned developments (e.g., the Applewood Development, Ward Road  Station area).   Key online interactive map inputs, including barrier and line data.   Bicycle networks of Arvada, Denver, and Lakewood.   Jefferson County wayfinding network.   Bike Jeffco’s recommendations for north‐south connectivity on Marshall Street and Garrison  Street.    Using this data, the team evaluated streets for their potential in forming a gridded network of bicycle  facilities that are comfortable for a large percentage of Wheat Ridge residents. The resulting network is  shown in Figure 12, along with associated facility recommendations. Recommendations are made for  paved trails, on‐street bicycle facilities (which could include sidepaths, separated bike lanes, or  conventional bike lanes), and neighborhood bikeways.       JOHNSONPARK WR HISTORICALPARK BOYD'SCROSSINGPARKBAUGHPARK APEL-BACHERPARK HOPPERHOLLOW PARKPROSPECTPARKANDERSONPARKHAPPINESSGARDENSPARK RANDALLPARKTOWNCENTERWHEAT RIDGERECREATIONCENTER LOUISETURNER PARK COMMUNITYCENTER PANORAMA PARKLEWISMEADOWSPARK STITESPARKHAYWARDPARK RICHARDS-HARTESTATE MANWARINGATHLETICFIELD PARAMOUNTPARK FRUITDALEPARK YE OLDEFIREHOUSE 37TH& UPHAMPARKDISCOVERYPARK CROWN HILLLAKE PARK West 32nd Avenue West 38th Avenue West 44th Avenue Ralston Road West 48thAvenue Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t West 58th Avenue K i p l i n g P a r k w a y Wa r d R o a d Sh e r i d a n B o u l e v a r d Ki p l i n g S t r e e t W a d s w o r t h B y p a s s Wa d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d West 46th Avenue West 26th Avenue Pa r f e t S t r e e t West 44th Avenue Lo w e l l B o u l e v a r d West 56th Avenue West 27th Avenue Te l l e r S t r e e t Ridge Road Grandview Avenue Mc I n t y r e S t r e e t Y a r r o w S t r e e t West 58th Avenue West 17th Avenue West 20th Avenue West 52nd Avenue B r o oks D r i v e West 32nd Avenue Fi e l d S t r e e t W e s t 48th Avenue Ha r l a n S t r e e t Ol d e W a d s w o r t h B o u l e v a r d W est 38th Avenue West 23rd Avenue Ca r r S t r e e t L u t h e r a n P a r k w a y Te n n y s o n S t r e e t We s t 5 0 t h A v e n u e West 29th Avenue West 41st Avenue West 57th Avenue Ro b b S t r e e t Mil l e r S t r e e t Q u a i l S t r e e t West 55th Avenue West 54th Avenue West 25th Avenue Al k i r e S t r e e t D e n v e r W e s t P a r k w a y T a b l e MountainParkway North Interstate Highway 70 S ervice R o a d North Interstate Highway 7 0 Fr o n t a g e R o a d Pi e r c e S t r e e t West 35th Avenue West 60th Avenue I n d e p e n d e n c e S tr e e t Oa k S t r e e t Wa r d R o a d Eld r i d g e S t r e e t La m a r S t r e e t M a r s h a l l S t r e e t Yo u n g f i e l d S t r e e t Ta b o r S t r e e t Pe r r y S t r e e t Ga r r i s o n S t r e e t Du d l e y S t r e e t Al l i s o n S t r e e t Si m m s S t r e e t Figure 12. Proposed Bicycle FacilitiesCity of Wheat Ridge Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Date: 6/22/2017 City Boundary G Line Station Park Existing Facilities Trail Unpaved Trail Sidepath Bike Lane Shared Lane Marking Shoulder Proposed Facilities Paved Trail Sidepath On-Street Bicycle Facility Neighborhood Bikeway 0 0.5 10.25 Miles 47    Bicycle Facility Recommendations  In this section, brief descriptions of the facility recommendations shown in Figure 12 are provided.  Specific projects are also listed in Tables 4 and 6 of ‘Chapter 6, Implementation.’   Paved Trails  The Clear Creek Trail forms the spine of Wheat Ridge’s bicycle network and attracts bicyclists of all ages  and abilities. It is an important regional corridor for transportation and recreation and provides a  comfortable means of biking to Golden or Denver.   The strong desire to access the Clear Creek Trail was reaffirmed at every stage of the public engagement  process. There are many existing access points, but most are informal and unpaved. Additionally,  wayfinding to trail access points has not been consistently implemented. Consistent with  recommendations from the 2015 Wheat Ridge Parks and Recreation Master Plan, this plan recommends  formalizing the connections to the Clear Creek Trail and providing amenities such as benches, trash cans,  and informational kiosks (including  wayfinding maps) at access points. In  addition to trailhead amenities, these  locations will require a short length of trail  to connect to adjoining streets.   Formalized connections to the Clear Creek  Trail are recommended at the following  locations:    Tabor Street (north of trail)   Oak Street (south of trail)    Iris Street (north of trail)   Hoyt Court (north of trail)   Garrison Street (north of trail)     A typical concept for trail access is shown in  Figure 13.    In addition to connections to Clear Creek  Trail, paved trails are recommended for  implementation as part of the Clear Creek  Crossing development, southwest of the I‐ 70/CO 58 interchange. The exact alignment  of those trails is to be determined in the  development review process. The Clear Creek Trail near Wadsworth Boulevard  48    Figure 13. Typical Clear Creek Trail Trailhead Diagram             49    Sidepaths and Separated Bike Lanes  The recently completed sidepath along Kipling Street provides a great connection between two  important bike routes – West 32nd Avenue and the Clear Creek Trail. Sidepaths are appropriate for such  high‐volume, high‐speed streets and are recommended on other arterials as discussed below. These  projects provide connectivity for bicyclists and also fill important gaps in the pedestrian network.  Potential sidepath projects are listed in Table 4.  Bike Lanes  Bike lanes provide delineated space for bicyclists. For the purposes of this plan, this recommendation  category includes standard bike lanes and buffered bike lanes. The appropriate variation or treatment  type for each recommendation should be investigated in more detail during the development of a  specific project. In cases where a lower‐stress variation (such as a wider or buffered bike lane) is  feasible, it should be implemented to provide greater comfort. Bike lanes are proposed for several  corridors, as listed in Table 4.   Neighborhood Bikeways  Neighborhood bikeways encompass a range of strategies intended to increase comfort for bicyclists and  pedestrians on streets without dedicated facilities. They are an important part of the overall bicycle  network in Wheat Ridge and are especially important because of the lack of connectivity in the street  network in many areas, and the limited right‐of‐way on most streets in the city.  A comprehensive network of neighborhood bikeways is proposed in this plan, in combination with off‐ street facilities and bike lanes as previously discussed. The proposed network takes advantage of the  City’s residential streets, which are generally low‐volume, low‐speed streets with on‐street parking. To  promote the use of this network, the City can implement pavement markings, signage, traffic calming  measures where needed (i.e., where vehicular speeding is high or believed to be an issue), crossing  improvements, and wayfinding. Many of the treatments discussed in the curbless streets section of  Chapter 4, ‘Pedestrian Element,’ also contribute to an improved environment for bicycling. Potential  neighborhood bikeways are listed in Table 4.  Wayfinding  Wayfinding is an important supplement to bicycle infrastructure. Strategically located signage helps  bicyclists get where they want to go. It is particularly important for less‐experienced bicyclist who may  not be familiar with the network.   The 2016 Jefferson County (JeffCo) Regional Bikeways Wayfinding Guide serves as a toolkit for the  development of a regional wayfinding network.25 When implemented, the wayfinding signs will form a  core component of a more intuitively navigable regional bikeway network. The wayfinding project  establishes graphic standards and a framework for implementation, as well as first, second, and third  priority wayfinding routes across the County. Within the City of Wheat Ridge, two routes ‐ 32nd Avenue  and a north‐south route that passes through Crown Hill Park to Arvada by way of Independence Street –  are identified as Priority 1 Routes. The regional wayfinding network informed the development of                                                               25 Jefferson County. Transportation and Engineering. http://jeffco.us/transportation‐and‐engineering/transportation‐ plans/bicycle‐and‐pedestrian‐plan/   50    bicycle network recommendations within this Plan as to ensure that bicyclists traveling both within the  City and throughout the County are safe and comfortable.  The intent of the JeffCo Wayfinding Guide is for regional routes to be implemented simultaneously, even  though many of them cross jurisdictional boundaries. Therefore, the City of Wheat Ridge should  continue coordinating with Jefferson County, Arvada, Lakewood, Westminster, and Golden, to ensure  the signage is fabricated and installed in concert.   Wayfinding is also needed on routes that fall outside the recommendations of the Jeffco Wayfinding  Guide. In particular, the following types of wayfinding are needed in Wheat Ridge:   Signage directing bicyclists to the Clear Creek Trail from feeder streets,   Routes that cross offset intersections,   Sidepaths that cross streets, and   Signage from bike facilities to key destinations, such as the Wheat Ridge Recreation Center,  Crown Hill Park, other city parks, libraries, schools, and other activity centers.     For wayfinding that falls outside the regional priority routes, the City should use the wayfinding  standards outlined in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards.      51    CHAPTER 6: IMPLEMENTATION  The infrastructure recommendations described in the Pedestrian and Bicycle Elements of this Plan will  help Wheat Ridge become a more bicycle‐ and pedestrian‐friendly city. This chapter provides guidance  for the City in the selection and funding of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure projects. The  implementation approach focuses on completing gaps in the pedestrian priority route network,  improving access to the Clear Creek Trail, and developing a citywide low‐stress bike network that is  comfortable for all riders.   Prioritization  The recommended pedestrian and bicycle facilities were evaluated across six categories related to the  overall goals of the community. For each category, up to four points were awarded based on the criteria  described in Table 2.   Table 2. Prioritization Criteria  Local vs. Regional Regional routes are classified as routes or streets that provide clear and  direct bike or pedestrian access into neighboring communities.  Proposed  facilities along these routes receive 4 points while local proposed facilities  receive 2 points.  Access to School Access to school was determined with the use of ½ mile network  walkshed. Proposed facilities that provide a direct connection to a school  receive 4 points, while proposed facilities that do not provide a direct  connection but are within the ½ mile walkshed receive 2 points.  Proposed  facilities outside of the ½ mile walkshed received zero points.  Geographic Priority Areas Proposed facilities along the corridor or directly within a Geographic  Priority Area (as defined in the 2010 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan)  receive a score of 4 points. Facilities that intersect or cross a corridor  identified as a Geographic Priority Area receive 2 points.  For example, a  proposed neighborhood bikeway along Depew Street crosses 38th Avenue  between Wadsworth and Sheridan (a geographic priority area) and  receives a score of 2 points.  Serves Multiple User Types Paved trails and sidepaths are given 4 points because these facilities are  used by both bicyclists and pedestrians. Detached sidewalks, bike lanes,  and neighborhood bikeways are given a 2 score of 2 points.  None of the  proposed facilities received a score of zero points.  Connectivity with Other Modes Proposed facilities within ½ mile of a G Line stop receive 4 points and  proposed facilities within ¼ mile of a bus stop are given a score of 2  points.  There were very few projects that score a zero due to the number  of bus stops within the community.  Completes a Gap or Extends  Existing Route/Trail  Proposed facilities that complete a gap and connect existing facilities on  each end receive 4 points. Proposed facilities that extend existing facilities  receive 3 points. Proposed facilities that intersect, but do not connect to  existing facilities on either end receive 2 points.      52    The prioritization criteria were applied to 118 potential projects, including construction of sidewalks,  trails, sidepaths, bike lanes, and neighborhood bikeways. These projects are ranked separately for  sidewalks and bicycle facilities (trails, sidepaths, bike lanes, and neighborhood bikeways).   Sidewalks  Sidewalk improvements should be focused along priority pedestrian routes as these corridors were  carefully selected to connect people to important destinations and establish a comprehensive  pedestrian network. Table 3 shows the ranking of sidewalk projects needed to fill gaps in the pedestrian  priority network (see also Figure 11).   Table 3. Proposed Sidewalk Projects  Rank Proposed Route From To Score 1 Ward Road26 49th Avenue 52nd Avenue 22 2 Kipling Street 35th Avenue 38th Avenue 18 3 32nd Avenue Garrison Street Dudley Street 14 4 41st Avenue Miller Street Kipling Street 14 5 Ridge Road Tabor Street Parfet Street 14 6 Tabor Street 49th Avenue 52nd Avenue 14 7 Tabor Street Clear Creek Trail 48th Avenue 14 8 38th Avenue Routt Street Moore Street 12 9 44th Avenue Youngfield Street Existing sidewalk to the West 12 10 52nd Avenue Taft Court Tabor Street 12 11 Garrison Street 45th Avenue 46th Place 12 12 Garrison Street 42nd Avenue 44th Avenue 12 13 Pierce Street 29th Avenue 32nd Avenue 12 14 Youngfield Street Clear Creek Trail 44th Avenue 12 15 48th Avenue Wadsworth Boulevard Upham Street 10 16 48th Avenue Pierce Street Clear Creek Trailhead 10 17 Dover Street 38th Avenue 44th Avenue 10 18 Dudley Street 32nd Place 34th Avenue 10 19 Eldridge Street 44th Avenue 48th Avenue 9 20 29th Avenue Jay Street Ingalls Street 8 21 48th Avenue Harlan Street 51st Street 8                                                                   26 The Ward Road sidewalk gap overlaps with a high‐priority sidepath recommendation for bicyclists. To  accommodate both pedestrians and bicyclists, a sidepath is recommended for Ward Road.    53    Bicycle Facilities  Since the existing bicycle facility network is less developed than the sidewalk network, there are more  recommendations for new bicycle facilities to be implemented than sidewalks. These recommendations  are shown in Table 4, ranked by priority.   Table 4. Proposed Bicycle Facility Projects  Rank Proposed Route From To Facility Type Score  1 Kipling Parkway 44th Avenue 51st Place Sidepath 21 2 Ward Road 44th Avenue 52nd Avenue Sidepath 20 3 44th Avenue Eldridge Street Harlan Street Sidepath 19 4 32nd Avenue Zinnia Court Youngfield Street Bike Lane 17 5 38th Avenue Youngfield Street Kipling Street Bike Lane 17 6 Ridge Road Ward Road Miller Street Bike Lane 17 7 CC Trail Moore Street Kipling Street Paved Trail 17 8 CC Trail Connector 44th Avenue Youngfield Service Road Paved Trail 17 9 Wadsworth Boulevard 32nd Avenue 48th Avenue Sidepath 17 10 Independence Street 49th Avenue 51st Avenue Bike Lane 15 11 35th Avenue Kipling Street Independence Street Neighborhood Bikeway 15 12 35th Avenue Parfet Street Kipling Street Neighborhood Bikeway 15 13 CC Trail Connector Wheat Ridge Rec Center 38th Avenue Paved Trail 15 14 Pierce Street 36th Avenue 38th Avenue Bike Lane 14 15 41st Avenue Dover Street Wadsworth Boulevard Neighborhood Bikeway 14 16 41st Avenue Reed Street Sheridan Boulevard Neighborhood Bikeway 14 17 High Court 38th Avenue 39th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 14 18 Youngfield Street 32nd Avenue 42nd Avenue Sidepath 14 19 Tabor Street Ridge Road 52nd Avenue Bike Lane 13 20 35th Avenue Teller Street Pierce Street Neighborhood Bikeway 13 21 Independence Street 35th Avenue 37th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 13 22 CC Trail Connector Iris Street/42nd Avenue Clear Creek Trail Paved Trail 13 23 CC Trail Connector Hoyt Court Clear Creek Trail Paved Trail 13 24 CC Trail Connector Garrison Street Clear Creek Trail Paved Trail 13 25 Tabor Street Clear Creek Trail 48th Avenue Bike Lane 12 26 35th Avenue Wadsworth Boulevard Upham Street Neighborhood Bikeway 12 27 Parfet Street Clear Creek Trail I‐70 Frontage Road South Neighborhood Bikeway 12 28 Parfet Street 32nd Avenue 41st Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 12 29 Upham Street 38th Avenue 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 12 30 Harlan Street 38th Avenue 44th Avenue Sidepath 12 31 Garrison Street Clear Creek Trail 44th Avenue Bike Lane 11 32 Miller Street 50th Avenue Ridge Road Bike Lane 11 33 35th Avenue Cul‐de‐sac Simms Street Neighborhood Bikeway 11 34 Holland Street 37th Avenue 38th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 11 35 Moore Street Clear Creek Trail 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 11 36 29th Avenue Ward Court Vivian Street Paved Trail 11 37 50th Avenue Miller Street Independence Street Bike Lane 10 38 34th Place Upham Street Teller Street Neighborhood Bikeway 10 39 39th Avenue High Court Reed Street Neighborhood Bikeway 10 40 Depew Street 26th Avenue 41st Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 10 41 Independence Street 44th Avenue 48th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 10 42 Teller Street 26th Avenue 38th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 10 43 29th Avenue Wadsworth Boulevard Sheridan Boulevard Neighborhood Bikeway 9 44 48th Avenue Wadsworth Boulevard Pierce Street Neighborhood Bikeway 9 45 Miller Court 38th Place 41st Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 9 46 Ward Court 29th Avenue 32nd Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 9 47 Oak Street 41st Place Clear Creek Trail Paved Trail 9 48 43rd Avenue Vance Street Upham Street Bike Lane 8 49 49th Avenue Miller Street Garrison Street Bike Lane 8 50 Garrison Street 44th Avenue 51st Avenue Bike Lane 8 51 I‐70 Frontage Road South Swadley Street Garrison Street Bike Lane 8 52 41st Avenue Parfet Street Oak Street Neighborhood Bikeway 8 54    Rank Proposed Route From To Facility Type Score  53 41st Avenue Oak Street Miller Court Neighborhood Bikeway 8 54 45th Avenue Teller Street Harlan Street Neighborhood Bikeway 8 55 Balsam Street 41st Avenue 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 56 Balsam Street 38th Avenue 41st Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 57 Depew Street 41st Avenue 43rd Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 58 Dudley Street 32nd Avenue 38th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 59 Fenton Street 26th Avenue 32nd Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 60 Iris Street 42nd Avenue 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 61 Lutheran Parkway 32nd Avenue 38th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 62 Marshall Street 38th Avenue 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 63 Marshall Street 32nd Avenue 35th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 64 Marshall Street 35th Avenue 38th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 65 Miller Street I‐70 Frontage Road North 50th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 66 Miller Street 32nd Avenue 35th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 67 Morningside Drive Rangeview Drive 32nd Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 8 68 Otis Street 48th Avenue Clear Creek Trailhead Neighborhood Bikeway 8 69 Robb Street I‐70 Frontage Road North Wheat Ridge city limit Neighborhood Bikeway 8 70 Twilight Drive 26th Avenue Rangeview Drive Neighborhood Bikeway 8 71 Union Street 32nd Avenue 32nd Drive Neighborhood Bikeway 8 72 48th Avenue Clear Creek Trail Harlan Street Bike Lane 6 73 37th Place Moore Street Miller Court Neighborhood Bikeway 6 74 42nd Avenue Youngfield Street Xenon Street Neighborhood Bikeway 6 75 45th Avenue Garrison Street Everett Street Neighborhood Bikeway 6 76 46th Avenue Tabor Street Swadley Street Neighborhood Bikeway 6 77 46th Avenue Everett Street Carr Street Neighborhood Bikeway 6 78 47th Avenue Balsam Street Wadsworth Boulevard Neighborhood Bikeway 6 79 47th Avenue Pierce Street Harlan Street Neighborhood Bikeway 6 80 Balsam Street 44th Avenue 47th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 81 Dover Street 38th Avenue 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 82 Jay Street 44th Avenue 47th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 83 Jay Street 41st Avenue 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 84 Miller Court 35th Avenue 37th Place Neighborhood Bikeway 6 85 Moore Street 37th Place 38th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 86 Oak Street 41st Avenue 41st Place Neighborhood Bikeway 6 87 Rangeview Drive Twilight Drive Morningside Drive Neighborhood Bikeway 6 88 Robb Street 44th Avenue I‐70 Frontage Road South Neighborhood Bikeway 6 89 Simms Street 35th Avenue 38th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 90 Swadley Street 46th Avenue I‐70 Frontage Road South Neighborhood Bikeway 6 91 Teller Street 44th Avenue 45th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 92 Upham Street 34th Place 35th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 93 Xenon Street 42nd Avenue 44th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 6 94 50th Avenue Oak Street Miller Street Neighborhood Bikeway 4 95 Carr Street 46th Avenue 48th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 4 96 Oak Street I‐70 Frontage Road North 50th Avenue Neighborhood Bikeway 4      55    Cost Estimates  Implementation of the pedestrian and bicycle facility recommendations described above would require  a significant capital investment over the course of several years. To accomplish this, Wheat Ridge would  need to dedicate local funding and secure federal funding or funding from other sources.   Planning‐level typical bicycle and pedestrian facility cost estimates are shown in Table 5. These are  order‐of‐magnitude estimates and do not include right‐of‐way acquisition or other unforeseen costs  that may be incurred. Actual costs will vary based on the ultimate project scope (i.e. potential  combination of projects, or use of city staff) and economic conditions at the time of construction.    Table 5. Bicycle Facility Planning‐level Typical Costs  Facility/Treatment Type Typical Cost Range Prevailing  Typical Cost Low High  Paved Trail $800,000 per mile $1.5 million per mile  $1 million per  mile  A concrete trail in an  independent alignment like  a greenbelt or former  railroad.   Example: An 8‐foot wide  connector trail linking a  neighborhood to a Greenbelt  Spine Trail.  Example: A 12‐foot wide trail  long a wooded greenbelt with  undulating topography and  numerous drainage crossings.  May include boardwalk  sections and small bridges.  Sidewalks and Sidepaths  $450,000 per mile $1.25 million per mile  $1 million per  mile A concrete sidewalk or path  along a roadway.   Example: An 8‐foot wide  connector sidepath along a  roadway as part of a larger  reconstruction project with  existing cleared and graded  right‐of‐way.  Example: A 12‐foot wide  sidepath with multiple grade‐ separated roadway crossings  and built in uncleared right‐ of‐way requiring grading.  Separated Bike Lane  $250,000 per mile $1 million per mile  $750,000 per  mile  Also known as a cycle track,  these can be one‐way or  two‐way. Separated from  the street by vertical  elements (e.g., flex posts,  bollards, medians, planters.).   Example: Reconfigure a  roadway to include a two‐ way flex post‐separated bike  lane on existing pavement as  part of a resurfacing project.  Example: Widen a roadway  by 14 feet independent of a  larger roadway project  expressly to add a pair of one‐ way median‐separated bike  lanes.   Bike Lanes $20,000 to $40,000 per mile  $650,000 per mile  $25,000 per  mile  Includes variations of bike  lanes, wide bike lanes, and  buffered bike lanes.  Significant savings can be  realized by constructing as  part of a larger roadway  project.  Example: Add bike lanes as  part of a resurfacing project  requiring no additional  pavement, but including  additional pavement  markings and signs. Lower‐ end estimates do not include  resurfacing.  Example: Widen a roadway  by 14 feet independent of a  larger roadway project  expressly to add buffered bike  lanes.      56    Shared Street $10,000 per mile $50,000 per mile  $20,000 per  mile  Low‐cost, strategically‐ placed pavement markings  (e.g., sharrows) and signage  along bike routes.  Example: Add bike route  signs or simple wayfinding  signs to an existing low‐ stress bikeway.  Example: Restripe a roadway  to provide a wide outside  shared lane with sharrows as  a stand‐alone project.   Neighborhood Bikeways  $100,000 per mile $500,000 per mile  $200,000 per  mile  Streets with various  combinations of traffic  calming, traffic diversion,  high‐visibility pavement  markings and enhanced  signage (depending on  context).  Example: Add bicycle  boulevard signs, shared lane  markings, and minor traffic  calming such as rubberized  speed cushions.  Example: Reconfigure or add  traffic signals at major  intersections and add  significant traffic calming  features, such as curb  extensions, mini traffic circles,  traffic diverters, and raised  crosswalks.   Shared Lane Markings  $10,000 per mile $50,000 per mile  $20,000 per  mile  Low‐cost, strategically‐ placed pavement  markings (e.g., shared  lane markings) and  signage along bike routes.   Example: Add Bikes May  Use Full Lane signs or  simple wayfinding signs to  an existing street.  Example: Restripe a  roadway to provide a wide  outside shared lane with  shared lane markings as a  stand‐alone project.     In Table 6, the top 10 sidewalk and top 10 bicycle facility projects are listed, along with order of  magnitude costs.      57    Table 6. High Priority Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Projects27  Category Description Cost  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on the west side of Kipling Street from 32 nd Avenue to north of  35th Avenue (south of Sprouts Market) $$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on 32nd Avenue from Garrison Street to Dudley Street $$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on 41st Avenue from Miller Street to Kipling Street $$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on Ridge Road from Tabor Street to Parfet Street $$$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on Tabor Street from 49th Avenue to 52nd Avenue $$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on Tabor Street from Clear Creek Trail to I‐70 Frontage Road28 $$$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on 38th Avenue from Routt Street to Moore Street $$$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on 44th Avenue from Youngfield Street to existing sidewalk to  the west $$$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on 52nd Avenue from west of Taft Court to Tabor Street $$  Sidewalk Construct sidewalk on Garrison Street from 45th Avenue to 46th Place $$  Sidepath Construct sidepath on Kipling Street, from 44th Avenue to 51st Place $$$  Sidepath Construct sidepath on Ward Road from 44th Avenue to 52nd Avenue $$$  Sidepath Construct sidepath on 44th Avenue from Eldridge Street to Harlan Street $$$  Bike Lane Implement bike lanes on 32nd Avenue from Zinnia Court to Ward Court $  Bike Lane Implement bike lanes on 38th Avenue from Youngfield Street to Kipling Street $  Bike Lane Implement bike lanes on Ridge Road from Ward Road to Miller Street $  Paved Trail Extend the Clear Creek Trail from 43rd Avenue to Kipling Street $$  Bike Lane Implement bike lanes on Independence Street from 49th Avenue to 51st Avenue $  Neighborhood  Bikeway  Implement neighborhood bikeway treatments on 35th Avenue from Kipling Street  to Independence Street $  Neighborhood  Bikeway  Implement neighborhood bikeway treatments on 35th Avenue from Parfet Street  to Kipling Street $$  $ ‐ less than $100,000; $$ ‐ $100,000‐$500,000; $$$ ‐ $500,000 or more                                                               27 Sidepath along Wadsworth Boulevard from 32nd Avenue to 48th Avenue and paved trail through the Clear Creek  crossing development are also highly ranked, but are not listed here because these facilities will be implemented in  conjunction with other planned projects.    28 The northern portion of this project may not be feasible within the constraints of the current Tabor St. bridge  over I‐70. Bike lanes are also proposed for this section and could provide a minimal level of pedestrian  accommodation until the opportunity for implementation of a sidewalk is presented.  58    Implementation Strategy   Given resource constraints, it is recommended that Wheat Ridge focus its effort on implementing the  high priority projects in the near term. However, the City should take advantage of opportunities to  implement other proposed projects by leveraging routine maintenance projects, other capital  improvement projects, or private funding through new development or redevelopment. The City should  remain flexible in elevating the priority of lower‐ranked projects, as all the proposed projects would  offer a benefit to Wheat Ridge residents.  Appendix D summarizes potential federal, state, regional, and locally‐administered funds for bicycle and  pedestrian infrastructure. Included within each category are a description of the funding source,  eligibility requirements, and direction to additional information where available.  Conclusion  This plan update has confirmed the Wheat Ridge community’s interest and dedication to providing a  more comfortable and inviting environment for people who walk or bike. Building from the existing base  of support and enthusiasm for active transportation, there are several strategic opportunities for the  City to make walking and biking more attractive, comfortable, and convenient for all of Wheat Ridge.   Strengthening the base of programs to encourage and educate residents is a low‐cost way to improve  walking and across the City. In addition, building the network through engineering strategies will  improve the City’s bicycle and pedestrian network. However, while this Plan outlines several projects for  implementation, greater investment in bicycling and walking facilities is needed to complete the  network and encourage people of all ages and abilities to get outside and enjoy Wheat Ridge by foot or  bike.            APPENDICES     Appendix A: Related Plans  The city, state, and region have adopted a number of plans that include evaluation and  recommendations related to walking and bicycling. This section summarizes the relevant  recommendations from existing plans that informed this Plan.    Recent planning efforts, including the 2015 Parks and Recreation Master Plan, envision a Wheat Ridge in  which residents are connected to every park, trail and open space system with routes designed for  biking, walking and active transportation. The City is building on these previous efforts by developing  the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan.   This Plan relates to the Strategic Prioritized Goals for the 2009 Five‐year Strategic Plan. These goals  address the challenges confronting the community and recognize the valuable community and city  assets that can be utilized to successfully meet those challenges. A walkable and bikeable city can help  attract and retain a fully engaged workforce (Goal 1: City Services). The goals of this Plan are consistent  with the Strategic Plan’s goal of Sustainable Growth by promoting the integration of multimodal  transportation systems and f the city as a steward of public resources by pursuing activities that support  environmental equity and health for all citizens.   Supporting active transportation investments supports and develops “thriving neighborhoods and  commercial centers” (Goal 4: Economic Vitality). Finally, this relates to Goal 5: Quality of Life by  preserving environmental resources, enhancing Wheat Ridge’s small town values, providing a safe  environment, and promoting opportunities for citizens to engage in an active lifestyle. It also promotes  civic engagement (Goal 6) by enhancing the sense of community.   Jefferson County – Countywide Transportation Plan (1998, amended 2002 and 2014)  Jefferson County’s Countywide Transportation Plan identifies four primary policy areas to guide bicycle  and pedestrian investments in the County, including:   Coordination ‐ All agencies involved with the planning and implementation of pedestrian and  bicycle facilities should work together to develop a coordinated effort to complete a project  which is safe and convenient for alternative modes.   Maintenance ‐ It is recommended that the Cities and County evaluate how issues such as citizen  concerns, regular maintenance and snow/sand removal are addressed. If deficiencies exist,  appropriate departments would set up programs to meet the needs of people using alternative  mode facilities.   Right‐of‐Way ‐ The inclusion of the acquisition of Right‐of‐Way (ROW) for the construction of  safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle facilities is needed when building new roadways.    Funding ‐ There should be coordinated efforts to actively compete for alternative mode funding  sources through the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) and the Colorado  Department of Transportation (CDOT).         Jefferson County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2012)  The Jefferson Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan supports the goals and policies identified in the Jefferson  Countywide Transportation Plan and County Comprehensive Master Plan, and outlines a long‐term vision  for the County by providing details about future transportation investments to help the County achieve  its goal of increasing the number of bike and walk trips. A regional approach that focuses on bicycle and  pedestrian accommodations that are continuous and consistent throughout the cities, towns, and  unincorporated areas of Jefferson County is also identified.  The JeffCo Regional Bikeways Wayfinding Guide (2016)   The JeffCo Regional Bikeways Wayfinding Guide serves as a toolkit for the development of a regional  wayfinding network. When implemented, the wayfinding signs will be a core component of the well‐ used, more intuitively navigable, and memorable JeffCo Regional Bikeway network. Through this Guide,  a clearer visual language and universal graphic standards were created to guide residents and visitors  along regional bikeways and to destinations throughout the county. The signage includes tier one, two,  and three tier destinations with mileage, distance, and travel time estimates. The Central Corridor  (Chatfield Reservoir, Kipling Street, US‐285, to Estes connection to Lakewood will pass through Wheat  Ridge and 32nd Avenue).            Appendix B: K‐8 School Walkshed Maps      å PROSPECT VALLEYELEMENTARYSCHOOL 41ST AV 33RDAV 31ST AV 36THPL 27THAV 30TH AV 28T HCDS A V P A R F E T C T UR B A N DR TA F T C T 39TH CI 39TH PL D A W N C T UN I O N S T 38TH PL TA B O R ST 40TH CI SI M M S S T OW E N S C T 33RD PL QU E E N ST 31ST P L RANGEVI E W PL QU A I L ST PI E R S O N ST OAK ST PA R F E T ST OA K S T NE L S O N ST MO O R E ST MI L L E R ST 38TH AV 39TH PL 38TH AV 36THPL TA B O R C T RO L F E C T 39THAV 38THPL 37THPL 35TH AV BEN T H A V E N DR 34THPL 34THPL 33RDPL 31STAV 33RDAV TAB O R S T MO O R E C T 34THAV 34THAV 36THAV 36THPL 30THPL QU A I L CT LE E S T 31STAV QU A I L S T MO O R E ST 35THPL RO U T T ST UN I O N ST 37THAV TA F T C T KL I N E ST 30THAV 34TH PL 31ST AV 35TH AV 32ND PL PI E R S O N CT 31ST P L 29TH AV MOU N T A I N SHA D O W S D R 37TH PL 36TH AV 37TH PL 36TH AV 37TH AV 27TH DR 39TH AV 39TH PL M O O R E C T 32ND AV NE W M A N S T 38TH PL OW E N S C T TA F T C T 29TH AV 26TH AV 27TH PL UN I O N C T 35TH AV 26TH PL 31ST AV MOR N I N G S I D E D R CIRCLE D R OW E N S S T PI E R S O N S T OW E N S S T OH A Y R E C T 40TH AV UN I O N C T UN I O N S T TA F T S T 28TH PL 36TH AV PI E R S O N S T RO U T T S T QU A I L S T 35TH PL NELSO N D R PARA M O U N T P Y DA W N C T 27TH AV 29TH P L TABOR D R QU A I L S T 28TH AV 29TH AV 31ST AV MO O R E S T 41ST PL 41ST AV 34TH PL 31ST PL NE L S O N S T 28TH P L RO U T T S T TA B O R C T 30TH AV OA K S T RANGEV I E W D R 28TH PL OA K S T SKY L I N E D R 32ND PL KL I N E S T P I E R S O N W Y 33RD AV LE W I S S T MI L L E R C T SI M M S C T MO O R E S T R O B B S T MO O R E S T SW A D L E Y S T SWADL E Y D R 41ST AV SI M M S S T PA R F E T S T 34TH AV ROUTT CI 30TH P L MI L L E R C T SI M M S S T SI M M S S T NE L S O N S T MI L L E R S T PAR F E T D R M I L L E R S T TWILI G H T D R HILLS I D E D R APPLEW O O DKNOLL D R ROBB CI å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance PROSPECT VALLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL å KULLERSTRANDELEMENTARYSCHOOL 33RD PL 31ST AV 30THAV SIM M S DR 35TH AV 39TH CI 39TH PL UN I O N S T 38TH PL 40TH CI 36TH PL 37TH PL VI V I A N C T WA R D R D 40TH AV 39TH PL 29THPL 42NDAV 36THPL VI V I A N C T TA B O R C T RO L F E C T 39THAV 38THPL UR B A N S T WR I G H T C T RO B B ST 42NDAV 33RDPL 33RDAV 34THAV 33RDAV 29THAV 29THAV RO U T T ST UN I O N ST TA F T C T 30TH P L UR B A N CT ZI N N I A CT 29TH PL 37TH PL 40TH AV 36TH AV 37TH PL 36TH AV 37TH AVWR I G H T C T 32ND AV VI V I A N C T WR I G H T S T W R I G H T S T 28TH P L UR B A N S T 38TH AV 28TH PL TA F T C T 44TH AV UN I O N C T 35TH AV Z I N N I A C T VA N GO R D O N S T UN I O N C T ZI N N I A S T UN I O N S T XE N O N S T ZI N N I A C T RO U T T S T 29TH P L TABOR D R WR I G H T S T 32ND DR 31ST AV 42ND AV 31ST AV 30TH DR MOU N T A I N SHA D O W S D R RO U T T S T TA B O R C T 32ND PLAL K I R E C T SI M M S C T R O B B S T WR I G H T C T WR I G H T S T 31ST PL SW A D L E Y S T SWADL E Y D R 38TH DR SI M M S S T VI V I A N S T ROUTT CI AL K I R E S T YO U N G F I E L D S T 30TH P L XE N O N S T SI M M S S T WA R D C T VI V I A N S T SI M M S S T TA B O R S T 31ST AV VIVIAN D R SIM M S S T 34TH PL 43RD AV ROBB CI YO U N G F I E L D S E R V I C E R D å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance KULLERSTRAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL n n nn å CHILDREN'SDAYPRESCHOOL T E L L E R S T AM M O N S S T 39TH AV38TH PL WE B S T E R S T 42ND AV 41ST AV41ST AV NEWLAND CDS ST 39TH AV RE E D S T NEWLANDCDS ST Z E P H Y R S T Q U A Y S T SA U L S B U R Y CT RE E D S T 35TH AV NEWLANDCDS ST 33RD AV 45THAV 36TH PL 44THPL 31STAV 34THPL 38TH AV 30THAV 33RD AV AM M O N S S T 35THPL UP H A M C T 39THAV 34TH P L 44THPL 34THPL 31ST AV 33RD AV 31ST PL 39TH AV 43RD PL 45TH AV 29TH PL 40TH AV 30TH AV AL L I S O N ST UP H A M S T QU A Y S T WE B S T E R ST RE E D S T HI G H C T AL L I S O N S T VA N C E S T AM M O N S CT BA L S A M S T MELROSE D R QU A Y S T 43RD AV 45TH AV OT I S S T HI G H C T 36TH PL 37TH AV VA N C E S T 36TH AV YU K O N C T 34TH DR 3 ACRE LN BA L S A M S T CO D Y S T YA R R O W C T YA R R O W S T QU A Y S T 33RD AV UP H A M S T VA N C E S T VA N C E S T QU A Y S T 45TH AV 37TH AV 42ND AV 43RD AV YA R R O W S T OT I S S T YA R R O W C T 30TH AVVA N C E S T OT I S S T PI E R C E S T 45TH AV 45TH PL WE B S T E R S T NE W L A N D S T UP H A M S T VA N C E S T YU K O N C T BR E N T W O O D S T ZE P H Y R C T 31ST AV 30TH AV RE E D S T CA R R S T 34TH AV NE W L A N D S T 35TH AV 32ND AV SA U L S B U R Y S T 44TH AV 44TH PL YAR R O W S T TE L L E R S T SA U L S B U R Y S T YA R R O W S T ZE P H Y R S T AL L I S O N S T BA L S A M S T BR E N T W O O D S T NE W L A N D S T 35TH AV TE L L E R S T OT I S S T AL L I S O N C T 45TH AV 32ND PL MA R S H A L L S T QU A Y S T BA L S A M S T BR E N T W O O D S T AL L I S O N S T UP H A M S T CA R R S T å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance CHILDREN'S DAY PRESCHOOL n n n n å EVERITTMIDDLESCHOOL 38TH PL 41ST AV 38TH AV JO H N S O N S T GA R R I S O N S T 43RD A V IN D E P E N D E N C E C T 39THAV 45TH AV 44TH PL JE L L I S O N CT 45TH PL 33RD PL 44TH AV 31ST P L 38TH AV 36TH AV 36TH AV I R I S C T OA K S T 37THPL 43RDAV 42NDAV 34THPL 31STAV MO O R E C T J E L L I S O N S T 34THAV IN D E P E N D E N C E CT GA R R I S O N S T 36THAV 36THPL LE E S T MO O R E ST 35THPL MI L L E R S T 37THAV 44TH PL KL I N E ST 34TH PL 37TH PL 35TH AV 32ND PL 45TH AV 32ND AV 39TH AV HO Y T C T 39TH PL M O O R E C T OW E N S C T NE W M A N S T OH A Y R E C T OA K S T M O R N I N G S I D E D R PA R F E T S T 39TH AV SKYLINE DR OW E N S S T 37TH AV IR I S C T FIE L D S T IR I S C T HO L L A N D C T 39TH AV OW E N S S T OW E N S S T MO O R E C T HO Y T S T OA K S T GA R L A N D S T HO L L A N D S T FL O W E R S T 36TH AV HO Y T S T LE E S T HILLSI D E D R 35TH PL 41ST AV 41ST PL MO O R E S T FL O W E R S T 35TH AV 34TH PL 31ST PL MO O R E S T PA R F E T S T NE L S O N S T I N D E P E N D E N C E C T OA K S T KL I N E S T 33RD AV HO Y T S T LE W I S S T HO L L A N D S T MI L L E R C T HO Y T C T 37TH AV 36TH AV MO O R E S T 35TH AV GA R L A N D S T MO O R E S T JE L L I S O N S T IR I S S T IN D E P E N D E N C E S T GA R L A N D S T 41ST AV HO L L A N D S T PA R F E T S T 34TH DR GA R R I S O N S T GA R L A N D S T MI L L E R C T IN D E P E N D E N C E S T 46TH AV GA R R I S O N S T GA R L A N D S T NE L S O N S T MI L L E R S T M I L L E R S T 34TH AV FIEL D D R GA R R I S O N S T å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance EVERITT MIDDLE SCHOOL n n nn åWHEATRIDGE 5-8 OT I S ST TE L L E R S T JA Y S T 46TH AV T E L L E R S T AM M O N S S T 39TH AV 38TH AV WE B S T E R S T 42ND AV 41ST AV NEWLAND CDS ST 39TH AV RE E D S T NEWLANDCDS ST Z E P H Y R S T 42ND AV Q U A Y S T Q U A Y S T SA U L S B U R Y CT RE E D S T NEWLANDCDS ST SA U L S B U R Y S T 45THAV 36TH PL 44THPL 46THPL 46THCI 41ST AV 34THPL RE E D ST 46THAV 33RD AV AM M O N S S T 39THAV 35THPL 39THAV 34TH P L 44THPL 43RDAV 34THPL 31ST AV 33RD AV 39TH AV 31ST PL 39TH AV WE B S T E R S T 43RD PL AL L I S O N ST RE E D S T HI G H C T AL L I S O N S T AM M O N S CT MELROSE D R QU A Y S T 43RD AV OT I S S T HI G H C T WE B S T E R S T VA N C E S T SA U L S B U R Y ST PI E R C E S T 33RD AV NE W L A N D S T LA M A R S T 36TH PL KE N D A L L S T 37TH AV VA N C E S T 36TH AV YU K O N C T 40TH AV 31ST AV 34TH DR 3 ACRE LN BA L S A M S T 46TH AV YA R R O W C T YA R R O W S T 33RD AV UP H A M S T VA N C E S T VA N C E S T JA Y S T 45TH PL QU A Y S T 46TH AV 45TH AV 37TH AV 42ND AV KE N D A L L S T 43RD AV YA R R O W S T M A R S H A L L S T OT I S S T LA M A R S T YA R R O W C T OT I S S T NE W L A N D S T QU A Y S T 45TH AV 45TH PL JA Y S T ZE P H Y R C T MA R S H A L L S T 32ND AV 31ST AV LA M A R S T LA M A R S T 34TH AV NE W L A N D S T YU K O N C T 35TH AV YAR R O W S T 35TH AV TE L L E R S T 35TH AV OT I S S T AL L I S O N C T 45TH PL UP H A M S T 45TH AVVA N C E S T 44TH PL 32ND PL MA R S H A L L S T KE N D A L L S T LA M A R S T QU A Y S T MA R S H A L L S T AL L I S O N S T 45TH AV KE N D A L L S T YA R R O W S T ZE P H Y R S T AL L I S O N S T SA U L S B U R Y S T UP H A M S T 44TH AV BA L S A M S T å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance WHEAT RIDGE 5-8 n n n å STS PETERAND PAULSCHOOL 41ST AV 39TH AV 43RDAV 44TH AV 39TH AV IN G A L L S S T 46THAV WE B S T E R S T NEWLAND CDS ST 41ST AV 35TH AV RE E D S T NEWLANDCDS ST 42ND AV Q U A Y S T SA U L S B U R Y CT RE E D S T WE B S T E R ST VA N C E ST T E L L E R S T PI E R C E S T JA Y S T LA M A R ST IN G A L L S ST KE N D A L L ST JA Y ST NEWLANDCDS ST HA R L A N ST GR A Y S T SA U L S B U R Y S T IN G A L L S S T HA R L A N C T 36TH PL FE N T O N ST 34THPL 33RD AV OT I S S T IN G A L L S S T 39THAV 35THPL 39THPL 34TH P L 44THPL IN G A L L S S T 43RDAV 34THPL 33RD AV 39TH AV FE N T O N CT 46TH PL TE L L E R S T 46TH PL 43RD PL RE E D S T HI G H C T QU A Y S T 43RD AV IN G A L L S S T OT I S S T HI G H C T 40TH AV39TH PL39TH AV 39TH AV 33RD AV 36TH PL 37TH AV VA N C E S T 36TH AV YU K O N C T 40TH AV 47TH AV 3 ACRE LN 35TH AV 38TH AV IN G A L L S S T UP H A M S T VA N C E S T 37TH PL VA N C E S T JA Y S T WE B S T E R S T 45TH PL QU A Y S T 46TH AV GR A Y S T 45TH AV 37TH AV 42ND AV 46TH PL KE N D A L L S T 43RD AV YA R R O W S T M A R S H A L L S T OT I S S T LA M A R S T OT I S S T NE W L A N D S T QU A Y S T 45TH AV 45TH PL GR A Y S T 34TH AV GR A Y S T JA Y S T 43RD AV 46TH AV 37TH AV MAR S H A L L S T I N G A L L S C T LA M A R S T LA M A R S T 34TH AV NE W L A N D S T YU K O N C T 35TH AV HA R L A N S T TE L L E R S T OT I S S T 32ND AV JA Y S T 46TH PL 45TH PL 45TH AV 44TH PL 32ND PL MA R S H A L L S T FE N T O N S T KE N D A L L S T IN G A L L S S T LA M A R S T QU A Y S T JA Y S T MA R S H A L L S T KE N D A L L S T UP H A M S T VA N C E S T UP H A M S T SA U L S B U R Y S T 45TH AV å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance STS PETER AND PAUL SCHOOL n n n n åSTEVENSELEMENTARYSCHOOL T E L L E R S T 39TH AV IN G A L L S S T WE B S T E R S T 42ND AV 41ST AV NEWLAND CDS ST 39TH AV 41ST AV RE E D S T NEWLANDCDS ST Z E P H Y R S T 42ND AV Q U A Y S T 47TH AV SA U L S B U R Y CT 48TH CI RE E D S T NEWLANDCDS ST SA U L S B U R Y S T 45THAV IN G A L L S S T 36TH PL 44THPL 46THCI 46THPL 40THAV 34THPL 39THAV VA N C E S T U P H A M S T 46THAV I N G A L L S S T OT I S S T IN G A L L S S T 39THAV 35THPL BALSAMST 34TH P L 44THPL 43RDAV 34THPL 39TH AV 39TH AV 46TH PL 38TH AV 46TH PL 43RD PL OT I S S T LA M A R S T M A R S H A L L S T JA Y S T RE E D S T MA R S H A L L ST HI G H C T AL L I S O N S T MELROSE D R QU A Y S T 33RD AV 43RD AV 47TH AV IN G A L L S S T OT I S S T HI G H C T 46TH AV 36TH PL 37TH AV 36TH AV YU K O N C T 40TH AV 34TH DR 3 ACRE LN 46TH AV YA R R O W C T YA R R O W S T IN G A L L S S T 33RD AV UP H A M S T VA N C E S T VA N C E S T JA Y S T WE B S T E R S T 45TH PL QU A Y S T 46TH AV 45TH AV 37TH AV 42ND AV 46TH PL KE N D A L L S T 43RD AV YA R R O W S T YA R R O W C T OT I S S T QU A Y S T PI E R C E S T 45TH AV 45TH PL JA Y S T ZE P H Y R C T MA R S H A L L S T I N G A L L S C T 48 T H A V YA R R O W S T 33RD AV LA M A R S T LA M A R S T 34TH AV 48TH AV NE W L A N D S T YU K O N C T 35TH AV KE N D A L L S T 35TH AV TE L L E R S T OT I S S T AL L I S O N C T 47TH PL JA Y S T 46TH PL 45TH PL 45TH AV 44TH PL 32ND PL MA R S H A L L S T KE N D A L L S T IN G A L L S S T LA M A R S T QU A Y S T JA Y S T MA R S H A L L S T NE W L A N D S T AL L I S O N S T 47TH AV YA R R O W S T ZE P H Y R S T 35TH AV TE L L E R S T VA N C E S T AL L I S O N S T UP H A M S T 45TH AV 44TH AV UP H A M S T SA U L S B U R Y S T å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance STEVENS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL n n nåWILMORE DAVISELEMENTARYSCHOOL CODY CT T E L L E R S T 41STAV AM M O N S S T 39TH AV 47THPLCA R R ST 38TH PL WE B S T E R S T 45TH PL 42ND AV 41ST AV UP H A M ST 39TH AV RE E D S T Z E P H Y R S T 47TH AV DU D L E Y S T SA U L S B U R Y CT RE E D S T EV E R E T T S T SA U L S B U R Y S T 35TH AV 45THAV EV E R E T T S T 36TH PL 44THPL 46THCI 46THPL 34THPL 46THAV 48TH CI FIELDDR AM M O N S S T 37THPL 35THPL 39THAV 34TH P L 44THPL 34THPL FIELD DR 39TH AV39TH AV 46THAV 43RD PL EVERETTDR 40TH AV RE E D S T HI G H C T AL L I S O N S T 46TH PL MELROSE D R 33RD AV 34TH AV 43RD AV HI G H C T DO V E R S T 33RD AV 32ND PL 38TH AV YU K O N C T EV E R E T T S T 36TH AV 37TH AV 34TH DR 3 ACRE LN BA L S A M S T CO D Y S T 46TH AV YA R R O W C T YA R R O W S T 44TH PL 33RD AV UP H A M S T VA N C E S T VA N C E S T WE B S T E R S T 45TH PL 46TH AV 45TH AV 42ND AV 46TH PL 43RD AV YA R R O W S T YA R R O W C T YA R R O W S T 45TH AV EVERETT D R 45TH AV BR E N T W O O D S T ZE P H Y R C T EV E R E T T S T CA R R S T EV E R E T T S T EVERETT DR CO D Y S T 48TH A V CA R R S T 34TH AV 48TH AV YU K O N C T 35TH AV DO V E R S T 35TH AV 35TH AV TE L L E R S T AL L I S O N C T ES T E S S T DU D L E Y S T BR E N T W O O D S T BA L S A M S T DO V E R S T CO D Y S T BR E N T W O O D S T AL L I S O N S T 47TH AV 44TH AV EV E R E T T S T ES T E S S T YA R R O W S T ZE P H Y R S T 46TH AV TE L L E R S T VA N C E S T AL L I S O N S T EV E R E T T C T UP H A M S T BA L S A M S T UP H A M S T ES T E S S T DU D L E Y S T SA U L S B U R Y S T CA R R S T å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance WILMORE DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL n n n n åCOMPASS MONTESSORI- WHEAT RIDGECHARTER SCHOOL LE E S T 41ST AV JO H N S O N ST 44TH AV 43RD A V IN D E P E N D E N C E C T 39THAV 44TH PL 43RD AV 38TH AV I R I S C T 45TH AV 39THAV 38TH AV 37THPL 43RDAV 42NDAV M I L L E R S T QU A I L CT MILLER C T MI L L E R S T 37THAV 44TH PL 37TH PL QU A I L S T PI E R S O N CT PA R F E T S T OW E N S ST NE L S O N ST 47TH PL MI L L E R ST OA K S T MO O R E ST IN D E P E N D E N C E ST HO Y T S T 47TH AV 46TH PL QU A I L S T 39TH AV HO Y T C T 39TH PL NE W M A N S T PA R F E T S T HO L L A N D S T 38TH PL 45TH AV 50TH AV 48TH NORTHAV - FRN I-70 NE L S O N S T 50TH AV 40TH AV OW E N S S T IR I S C T IN D E P E N D E N C E S T KI P L I N G S T 39TH AV PI E R S O N S T 47TH AV MO O R E C T PI E R S O N S T OA K S T PI E R S O N S T 48TH AV LE E S T 47TH PL 47TH AV 41ST PL 41ST AV 48TH NORTHAV - FRN I-70 MO O R E S T PA R F E T S T IR I S S T 49TH AV 48TH SOUTHAV - FRN I-70 OA K S T 49TH AV HO Y T S T OA K S T HO Y T S T HO L L A N D S T MI L L E R C T HO Y T C T MO O R E S T JE L L I S O N S T IR I S S T 41ST AV 46TH AV 47TH AV NE L S O N S T 50TH AV PA R F E T S T IN D E P E N D E N C E S T å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance COMPASS MONTESSORI - CHARTER SCHOOL n n n n åNORMA ANDERSONPRESCHOOL 41ST AV 44TH AV 43RD A V 39THAV 44TH PL 43RD AV PA R F E T S T 39THPL 40THCI MO O R E ST MI L L E R ST LE E ST 38TH AV SW A D L E Y ST 39TH PL RO L F E C T 39THAV 38THPL RO B B S T M I L L E R S T SI M M S CT QU A I L CT MI L L E R S T 44TH PL PI E R S O N CT 47TH PL OA K S T QU A I L S T 38TH AV 39TH AV 39TH PL 49TH AV NE W M A N S T PA R F E T S T 45TH P L 46TH AV 38TH PL 45TH AV 50TH AV 48TH NORTHAV - FRN I-70 NE L S O N S T OW E N S S T PI E R S O N S T 47TH AV 40TH AV KI P L I N G S T MO O R E C T PI E R S O N S T OA K S T PI E R S O N S T 48TH AV 46TH AV 47TH AV LE E S T 46TH PL 47TH PL 50TH AV 41ST PL 41ST AV 41ST AV SW A D L E Y S T MO O R E S T SI M M S S T PA R F E T S T 49TH AV 50TH AV RO U T T S T RO U T T S T OA K S T 49TH AV OA K S T MI L L E R C T SI M M S C T MO O R E S T R O B B S T JE L L I S O N S T RO B B S T SI M M S S T 46TH AV 47TH AV NE L S O N S T PA R F E T S T 48TH SOUTHAV - FRN I-70 å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance NORMA ANDERSON PRESCHOOL n n n å ALPINEVALLEYSCHOOL 41ST AV 43RD A V 44TH PL 43RD AV 39TH CI 39TH PL 40TH CI 39TH PL RO L F E C T 39THAV 38THPL RO B B S T MIL L E R S T SI M M S CT MI L L E R S T 44TH PL RIDGE RD 47TH PL OA K S T QU A I L S T 39TH AV 39TH PL NE W M A N S T PA R F E T S T 45TH P L 38TH PL SI M M S P L 45TH AV 50TH AV 48TH NORTHAV - FRN I-70 NE L S O N S T OW E N S S T SW A D L E Y S T PIE R S O N S T 47TH AV 40TH AV MO O R E C T PI E R S O N S T TA B O R S T OA K S T PI E R S O N S T 48THNORTH AV - FR N I-70 RO U T T S T 48TH AV 46TH AV 47TH AV LE E S T 46TH PL 47TH PL 49TH AV 44TH AV 46TH AV SI M M S C T OA K S T 50TH AV ROB B S T 41ST PL 41ST AV SW A D L E Y S T MO O R E S T SI M M S S T PA R F E T S T RO U T T S T S I M M S S T 49TH AV OA K S T PA R F E T S T MI L L E R C T MO O R E S T NE L S O N S T RO B B S T 46TH AV 47TH AV 41ST AV TA B O R S T 50TH AV 48TH SOUTHAV - FRN I-70 PA R F E T S T å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance ALPINE VALLEY SCHOOL n n n å PENNINGTONELEMENTARYSCHOOL 41ST AV KIP L I N G CT 43RD A V IN D E P E N D E N C E C T 39THAV 41ST AV O A K S T 50TH AV GA R R I S O N S T 48THAV 43RDAV JE L L I S O N ST HO Y T ST 42NDAV MIL L E R S T JE L L I S O N CT JO H N S O N ST51ST PL 51ST AV KI P L I N G S T 45TH PL MI L L E R S T 44TH PL 46TH AV HO Y T S T 47TH PL NE W M A N S T FL O W E R CT 44TH AV FI E L D C T 50TH AV HO Y T C T 51ST AV HO Y T C T 39TH AV NE W C O M B ST 45TH AV 48TH NORTHAV - FRN I-70 NE L S O N S T IR I S C T FIE L D S T IN D E P E N D E N C E S T EV E R E T T S T 48TH AV 47TH PL 9F HO L L A N D S T 39TH AV MO O R E C T EVERE T T D R LE E S T 45TH AV 47TH AV GA R L A N D S T EV E R E T T S T FL O W E R S T G A R R I S O N S T MO O R E S T IR I S S T EV E R E T T S T FI E L D S T MI L L E R C T NE L S O N S T MO O R E S T FLO W E R S T 49TH AV ES T E S S T EV E R E T T S T HO Y T S T HO Y T S T HO Y T C T JE L L I S O N S T IR I S S T 41ST AV 46TH PL 49TH AV 49TH PL 48TH SOUTHAV - FRN I-70 47TH AV 46TH AV GA R L A N D S T 48TH NORTHAV - FRN I-70 49TH AV 50TH AV GA R L A N D S T HO L L A N D S T GA R R I S O N S T EV E R E T T C T IN D E P E N D E N C E S T FIEL D D R å Focus School n Other K-8 SchoolSidewalk TrailWalkable Network1/2 Mile Walking Area1/2 Mile Buffer Date: 1/27/201700.250.125 Miles User: jfish Path: H:\B000\B030 Wheat Ridge Bike Ped Plan\PRODUCTION\GIS\MXDs\2017_January\2017_DRAFT_WR_School_Walksheds.mxd K-8 SchoolWalking Distance PENNINGTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL     Appendix C: ATAT Pedestrian Priority Routes                                 Page intentionally left blank           Appendix D: Funding Sources   Summarized here are potential Federal, State, regional, and locally‐administered funds for bicycle and  pedestrian infrastructure. Included within each category are a description of the funding source, some  eligibility requirements, and direction to additional information where available.  Federal Funding   In December 2015, President Obama signed the newest transportation authorization bill, Fixing  America’s Surface Transportation Act (the FAST Act), into law. The FAST Act streamlines some programs  but is not expected to substantially affect program eligibility or funding requirements at the local level.  As with any new legislation, it is possible that some of the individual components of specific programs  will change in the near future. Therefore, the City of Wheat Ridge should use up‐to‐date information,  regulations, and requirements when pursuing grant money.   Transportation Alternatives   The FAST Act replaced the former Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) with a set‐aside of funds  under the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STBG). For administrative purposes, the Federal  Highway Administration (FHWA) will refer to these funds as the TA Set‐Aside. The TA Set‐Aside  authorizes funding for programs and projects defined as transportation alternatives, including on‐ and  off‐road active transportation facilities, infrastructure projects for improving non‐driver access to public  transportation and enhanced mobility, recreational trail projects, and safe routes to school projects.  Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Grant   TIGER grants fund a broad array of road, rail, transit, bicycle, and pedestrian projects. The program  focuses on capital projects that generate economic development and improve access to reliable, safe,  and affordable transportation, especially for disadvantaged communities. TIGER grants only fund  projects that have gone through preliminary design and there is typically preference given to projects  with broad stakeholder support. Applicants are required to demonstrate that project benefits outweigh  costs. Projects in urban areas, such as in Wheat Ridge, must request at least $10 million with a minimum  20 percent match.   Enhanced Mobility of Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities Program  This program is intended to enhance mobility for seniors and persons with disabilities by providing funds  for programs to serve transit‐dependent populations beyond traditional public transportation services  and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services (this program  consolidates New Freedom eligible projects). Bicycle and pedestrian improvements that provide access  to an eligible public transportation facility and meet the needs of the elderly and individuals with  disabilities can receive funding.  Section 402 State and Community Highway Safety Grant Program  The Section 402 program provides grants to states to improve driver behavior and reduce deaths and  injuries from motor vehicle‐related crashes. The program is jointly administered by the National  Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) at the  federal level and by State Highway Safety Offices at the state level. Funds may be used to reduce  impaired driving, reduce speeding, improve pedestrian and bicycle safety, and reduce school bus deaths  and injuries, among other activities. Child and adult bicycle safety education is eligible for funding.       State‐Administered Funding   This section describes State‐administered funding sources, including those that use Federal funds and  those that use state‐generated revenue:    Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS)   Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Trails Program    Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)    Federal Lands Access Program (FLAP)    Land and Water Conservation Fund    Safe Sidewalk Program   Safe Routes to Schools (SRTS)   This program provides funding for education, enforcement, evaluations, and infrastructure  improvements near elementary and middle schools that promote students walking and biking to school.  Currently, the SRTS program is administered by CDOT. Interested communities can apply for  infrastructure and non‐infrastructure projects through a competitive application process.   Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Funds  CPW’s Trails Program receives RTP funds through FHWA. Eligible grant applicants for this funding include  local, state, and federal agencies, non‐profits, clubs, recreation and metro districts.   Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)   HSIP funds are available for safety projects aimed at reducing traffic fatalities and serious injuries. Bike  lanes, roadway shoulders, crosswalks, intersection improvements, underpasses, and signs are examples  of eligible projects. Projects in high‐crash locations are most likely to receive funding. Colorado has  identified bicycle and pedestrian safety as Emphasis Areas and is more likely to fund bicycle and  pedestrian safety projects as a result.  Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Trails Program   CPW receives four types of grant funds which are distributed annually to successful trail grant  applicants: Great Outdoors Colorado (GOCO) Local Government matching grants, Great Outdoors  Colorado (GOCO) State Parks matching grants, Federal Recreational Trails Program (RTP) Funds, and  Federal Land and Water Conservation Funds (LWCF).  Regionally Administered   This section describes funding sources administered by the Denver Region Council of Governments  (DRCOG), including several Federal funding programs. In the descriptions below, the programs are  referred to by their new names under the FAST Act:    Surface Transportation Block Grant Program    Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Set‐Aside    Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program    Community Services Block Grant Program (CSBG)    Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH)    Surface Transportation Block Grant Program   The STBG Program is the new name for the Surface Transportation Program. This flexible program may  be used by States and localities for projects to preserve and improve the conditions and performance on      any Federal‐aid highway, bridge and tunnel projects on any public road, pedestrian and bicycle  infrastructure anywhere, and transit capital projects, including intercity bus terminals. Eligibility includes  bicycle transportation and pedestrian walkways, ADA sidewalk modification, recreational trails, and any  activity eligible under the Set‐Aside program (see below). DRCOG and the State control funds which they  can spend or distribute within the region.   Surface Transportation Block Grant Program Set‐Aside   This Set‐Aside, established in the FAST Act, replaces the Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP).29  Funding through the Set‐Aside can be used for the construction of sidewalks, walkways or curb ramps;  bike lane striping, bike parking and bus racks; traffic calming; off‐road trails; bike and pedestrian bridges  and underpasses; ADA compliance; acquisition of railroad rights‐of‐way; and planning, design and  construction of multiuse trails and rail‐with‐trail projects. Larger Metropolitan Planning Organizations,  such as DRCOG, control a share of the funds to distribute locally through a competitive process.   Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement (CMAQ) Program   The CMAQ program supports surface transportation projects, like those for active transportation  projects, due to their linkage to air quality improvements. Because Wheat Ridge is within the larger  Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas that are not in compliance with the National Ambient Air  Quality Standards, projects to improve air quality via active modes could be eligible for CMAQ funding.  Local Funding   This section describes locally‐administered funding sources:    General Fund    Bond Financing   Impact Fees    Special Assessment or Taxing Districts    Development‐driven Projects    General Fund   General funds, like those used for maintenance and some capital improvement projects, can be  leveraged to enhance bicycle and pedestrian access. For example, streets identified for reconstruction  or repaving should be evaluated for their potential to complete or augment the existing bicycle and  pedestrian networks.   Bond Financing  Bond financing is a long‐term borrowing tool used to provide funds for capital projects. Bond measures  are approved by voters and can authorize specific projects, including transportation improvements  identified through the legislative process.   Impact Fees   Impact fees are paid by the developers to fund a fraction of the improvements that are required  because of the new growth. Impact fees can be instituted to fund bicycle and pedestrian projects, such  as trails. Impact fees are typically tied to trip generation rates and traffic impacts produced by a                                                               29 The TAP included the former Transportation Enhancements Program, the Safe Routes to School Program, and  the Recreational Trails Program.        proposed project. Establishing a clear nexus between the impact fee and the project’s impacts is critical.  Impact fees may be considered at a citywide scale or for new developments within the city.    Special Assessment or Taxing Districts   Special districts are organized to fund a specific project that benefits an identifiable group of properties.  They are designated areas within which property owners are assessed a charge to defray the costs of  capital improvements that can benefit the properties within the district. The costs of improvements are  generally divided among property owners within a specified area. The contribution by owner can be  allocated based on property frontage or other methods such as traffic trip generation. Transportation  Development Districts (TDD) are one example of these districts used to finance transportation  improvements, such as bicycle and pedestrian amenities. A TDD has the power to issue a bond to pay for  the construction of projects that can benefit the district. Special districts may be considered for some  areas within the study area; especially within downtown cores.   Development‐Driven Projects  Developers construct the local streets within subdivisions and may participate in the construction of  collector/arterial streets and trails adjacent to their properties  Other Sources   This section describes other potential funding sources:    The Kresge Foundation    The Conservation Fund   People for Bikes    The Walmart Foundation   Robert Wood Johnson Foundation   Bike Shop Sponsorships   Home Owners’ Associations   Crowdfunding     The Kresge Foundation   The Kresge Foundation provides grants to nonprofit organizations and government agencies seeking  financial assistance for projects that contribute to improving health at the community level. The goal of  these grants is to create a comprehensive system that improves health outcomes, promotes health  equity, reduces per‐capita health costs, remove barriers to health, and offers the greatest promise for  adoption on a larger scale. Active transportation facilities may be competitive for this funding.   The Conservation Fund  The Conservation Fund provides loans for land acquisition to support the creation of bicycle and  pedestrian facilities.  Their loan program offers flexible financing as well as sustained and expert  technical assistance to organizations aiming to protect key properties in their communities.  People for Bikes   People for Bikes supports bicycle infrastructure projects and advocacy initiatives that make it easier and  safer for all people to ride. Their grant funds are awarded to infrastructure projects such as bike paths,  lanes, trails, bridges, and end‐of‐trip facilities such as bike racks, bike parking, and bike storage. Some  examples of People for Bikes grants in the Denver region.       Denver‐Boulder Bikeway – In 2001, a $10,000 grant to Bicycle Colorado to ensure the US‐36  bikeway was included as the preferred alternative.    BikeDenver – In 2009, BikeDenver received $10,000 to implement a bike share program and  improve city infrastructure and policies related to bicycling. Similarly, in 2011 they received  $2,500 to launch their first Viva Streets event in August 2011.     Walmart Foundation  Walmart Foundation provides significant funding for projects that align with their key focus areas:  Opportunity, Sustainability and Community. In addition, staff are encouraged to participate in volunteer  projects and can provide smaller levels of financial support.     Robert Wood Johnson Foundation    The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation provides grants for projects that improve community health and  the health care system with a focus on non‐infrastructure projects.  Most grants are awarded through  calls for proposals (CFPs) available on their website. Brief proposals for projects that suggest new and  creative approaches to solving health and health care problems can be submitted at any time.    Bike Shop Sponsorships  Trail and bicycle programs have a positive effect on the economy.  Many of those who benefit would like  to give back.  Bike shops are often willing to donate a portion of their proceeds towards community  events or the completion of a particular project.  Home Owners’ Associations  As more and more communities recognize the benefits of biking and walking, they are willing to support  extensions of existing systems or connections to their neighborhood.  Home Owners Associations and  other neighborhood groups are often willing to fund all or part of a project to hasten its completion.  Crowdfunding   Crowdfunding focuses on raising money for projects through many small donations. Websites, such as  gofundme.com, ioby.com, and indiegogo.com, allow fundraising campaigns to be easily established. In  2014, Memphis raised $70,000 through crowdfunding to build a separated bicycle lane. In 2015, Denver  launched a crowdfunding campaign focused on corporate donors for the planning and design of a  protected bike lane in downtown. Crowdfunding can be a creative approach to using community‐based  donations to leverage public funding.