Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-17-10City of jdge��(Wh6atl� MUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building September 11, 2017 Kyle Arienta Precision Renovations 724 Albion St Denver, CO 80220 Re: Case No. WA -17-10 Dear Mr. Arienta: 7500 W. 29`h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 Please be advised that your request for a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the 10 -foot rear yard setback requirement for a residential addition on property zoned Residential -Two (R-2) and located at 3990 Carr Street has been approved. Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance. Please note that all variance requests automatically expire within 180 days (March 8, 2018) of the date it was granted unless a building permit for the variance has been obtained within such period of time. You are now welcome to apply for a building permit to construct the deck. Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions. Sincerely, Tammy Odean Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Approval of Variance Case Report Cc: Andrew Guerrero WA -17-10 (case file) WA1710.doc www.ci.wheatridge.co.us 7500 West 29th Avenue City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Wheat F1 iAe 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Approval of Variance WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 3990 Carr Street referenced as Case No. WA -17-10 / Arienta; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 5 -foot variance (50%) from the minimum rear yard setback requirement of 10 feet for rear yards on property zoned Residential -Two (Case No. WA -17-10 / Arienta) is granted for the property located at 3090 Reed Street, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 2. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment that would not be possible without a variance. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification period. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the addition be similar in character to the existing house and consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. Community D 41) 7 Date � City Of Wheat TO: CASE MANAGER: CASE NO. & NAME: ACTION REQUESTED: LOCATION OF REQUEST APPLICANT (S): OWNER (S): APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING: PRESENT LAND USE: age CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT Community Development Director Scott Cutler WA -17-10 / Arienta DATE: September 6, 2017 Approval of a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the 10 -foot rear yard setback requirement for a residential addition on property located at 3990 Carr Street and zoned Residential -Two (R-2) 3990 Carr Street Kyle Arienta, Precision Renovations Andrew Gurrero 12,602 Square Feet (0.289 Acres) Residential -Two (R-2) Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Map (X) NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION STRATEGY Site JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make an administrative decision. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the 10 -foot rear yard setback requirement for a single-family home. The purpose of this variance is to allow for the homeowner to construct an addition on their existing home. Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard. II. CASE ANALYSIS The variance is being requested so the property owners may construct an addition on the east side of their home. The property is located on the southeast corner of W. 40"' Avenue and Carr Street. The existing house sits on a 12,602 square foot parcel and was originally constructed in 1952 per the Jefferson County Assessor (Exhibit 1, Aerial). The property is zoned Residential -Two (R-2), as are all of the surrounding areas (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). The land uses are primarily single-family homes, with some duplexes. The R-2 zone district provides for high quality, safe, quiet and stable low to moderate -density residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of any nature which are incompatible with the residential character. All residential zone districts require larger side and rear yard setback minimums when adjacent to public streets, limiting the buildable area of this property. On this property, the eastern property line is considered the rear property line, and in the R-2 zone district, a single-family home requires a 10 -foot minimum rear setback. The proposed addition will encroach upon this required setback, prompting the request for a 5 -foot (50%) variance to the 10 -foot setback (Exhibit 3, Site Plan). The elevation drawing submitted (Exhibit 4), shows how the proposed addition would fit in with the existing house. The roof peak is lower than the existing peak, and the pitch matches the existing roof pitch. The purpose of the addition is to accommodate a new bedroom and bathroom for an aging parent. The property owner had previously inquired about an additional dwelling unit, but this is not permitted. The primary reason for the variance request is based on the existing layout of the home and yard. The submitted floor plan (Exhibit 5), shows the logic behind the applicant's request. It would be difficult to create a bedroom and bathroom addition to the home on the street -facing side of the home without significantly altering the layout of the home and disrupting the facade and yard. The applicant's request would not disturb the facades and would have minimal visual impact. It would also more easily connect to the existing home through the living room and allow the family to continue to use the existing private backyard and patio without disrupting or partitioning the yard. The addition is designed to line up with the existing concrete patio. The existing plumbing lines are also the most accessible from the location of the proposed addition. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-101 Arienta The site photographs provided indicate the current conditions of the rear yard and side yard along W. 401h Avenue, as well as the Carr Street frontage (Exhibit 6). The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property, as illustrated in the provided site plan, elevation, and written request (Exhibit 7, Request). The request includes detailed reasoning about why they have chosen the specific location for the proposed addition. Development Standards The parcel does not meet minimum standards for the R-2 zone district, as it is too narrow on the Carr Street frontage. The proposed addition meets all requirements for the R-2 zone district besides the rear setback requirement. The following table compares the required R-2 development standards with the actual and proposed conditions: R-2 Development Standards: Required Actual Lot Area 9,000 square feet (min) 12,602 square feet Lot Width (corner lot) 80 feet (min for both frontages) 75 feet (west) 175 feet (north) Building Coverage 40% (max) 27.14% (with addition) One -Family Dwelling: Allowed Proposed Addition Height 35 feet (max) —12.5 feet (below existing roofline) Rear Setback (east) 10 feet (min) 5 feet Side Setback (south) 5 feet (min) —5 feet (in-line with house) Side Setback (north, for corner lot) 25 feet (min) —35 feet III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve an administrative variance, the Community Development Director must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria (Exhibit 7, Request). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. A variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. The R-2 zone district allows additions of the proposed size, and many surrounding properties have similarly -sized setbacks. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta The front yard is considered to be on Carr Street due to the position of the front door, the assigned address, and the existing setbacks, though the home has a more established presence on W. 40th Avenue. To note, the side setback requirement for homes in the R-2 zone district is 5 feet, which would not require a variance, and this request visually functions as a side setback request. The home to the east, 8220 W. 40th Avenue, has a side setback of approximately 5 feet. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property, consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy. Constructing an addition would allow space for the applicant's mother to live independently while still in the same home as the family. Per Assessor records, the home has only one full bath. An additional bedroom and full bathroom will increase the value of this property. The applicant has already invested substantially in the property, building an attractive front and side fence and making minor facade upgrades. Building an addition along the Carr Street facade of the home is possible because of the existing 47 -to -50 -foot setback, but it would highly disrupt the flow of the home, requiring the existing front entrance to be relocated (Exhibit 5). It would also disturb the front yard and may require the removal of one or two mature trees. Given the layout and position of the existing home, the position of the trees on the lot, and desire to preserve the minimal usable rear yard space, it is virtually impossible to make this investment without a variance. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. Being a corner lot triggers the need for two frontages of the structure to be setback at least 25 feet from the property line adjacent to a public street, and the position of the home on the property leaves no usable space in the side yard to the south. The location of the home on the lot could warrant an addition to the front towards Carr Street, but as noted in Criterion #3, any addition would highly disrupt the front fagade and require the relocation of the front door and entrance area. It would also not make sense to have a bedroom as the front entrance of the home. At least four trees in the street -facing setbacks are mature, and their removal would reduce the quality of the yard. The developable area of the rear yard is also limited due to the 10 -foot required setback. The applicant wishes to preserve some usable space in this area, since it is the only private outdoor space on the lot. The proposed addition preserves the rear patio and eliminates the existing covered portion of the patio which currently has a nonconforming 0 -foot rear setback. An addition meeting all rear setback requirements would require reconfiguration that would effectively eliminate most of the patio and usable yard space. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. Because the current owner neither platted the lot, nor constructed the home in its current location or orientation, the difficulties have not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets. The addition would not impede the sight distance triangle and would not increase the danger of fire. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. Some lots in the immediate vicinity of the property—such as 4095 Carr Street, 4101 Brentwood Street and 8225 W. 41" Avenue—have similar rear/side yard conditions. These properties have limited rear and side yard space to add on to the homes, and are limited by the required 25 foot setbacks for yards facing public streets. If these homeowners wished to build additions or accessory structures, they would likely need to pursue a variance. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the required 10 -foot rear yard setback for one -family dwellings in the R-2 zone. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The alleged hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment that would not be possible without a variance. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification period. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the addition be similar in character to the existing house and consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. Administrative Review Case No, WA -17-10 /Arienta Wheatf <1,C ge Geographic Information Systems Legend Q Subject Property 04065 - k EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL R • 'A01— - N � f IaWr�rrir .ice .tet. +s-er •:.sem ... 04020 1 08295 w oszlo r 03920. 03939 Ic ,� 03912 03915r t " 0 ipJ 03910 + 03901 State Plane Coordinate Projection ij Colorado Central Zone A Datum' NA083 N uu •�otKr. � /P�w v� �ruyryt w..aov Abu n��vr� • � rwi rN. .rnMF � - ��� ✓ns ne .M u��vvww• Administrative Review 7 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP * ; 04000, 'q 1` Ilk, 03980 0396 ,r 03880 7 031870 0 041 a `*w Sp ;,r ]� F. VJ7VD �P 03 03885•; t..0318601 0338515 :1InT7`' awl r 04021 08200 F7: State Plate Coordinate Projection N Colorado Central Zone Datum: 14AD83 wvM4 4 W ar Administrative Review 8 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta r o . I Wheat ice Geographic 04101 Information Systems 01700 Leciend Q Subject Property l Residential -Two (R-2) Residential -One (R-1) 04095 04090 z• f1�f1Y11 x t �r� sk * ; 04000, 'q 1` Ilk, 03980 0396 ,r 03880 7 031870 0 041 a `*w Sp ;,r ]� F. VJ7VD �P 03 03885•; t..0318601 0338515 :1InT7`' awl r 04021 08200 F7: State Plate Coordinate Projection N Colorado Central Zone Datum: 14AD83 wvM4 4 W ar Administrative Review 8 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta 1 EXHIBIT 3: SITE PLAN 1� VSe n IF- [,e 1-coY- w � sT Administrative Review 9 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta EXHIBIT 4: ELEVATION meg, 1� ceb� Asap 01 l_ocKv� Baa.. ov, 12 Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta \N 0'IN 10 EXHIBIT 5: FLOOR PLAN 18.5' Covered Patio ro be removed Concrete Patio '^ Li [647.5 Sq ft] m Approx. Open Patio location of addition Bedroom Dining First Floor [2347.83 Sq 1t] Bath Storage 0 Family N � 14.6' En 2 Car Attached ty [556.5 Sq ft] 16.5' 7 Bedroom 21' Carr Street Mud Rm 10TH sa1N Iry,6 Mme,, Inc. Area Glwlatbn. Summa LWlnq Ane Gkulation 0@12118 Bath Fn 2347.83 Sq It N rn ui n U3 Kitchen Laundry Bedroom Dining First Floor [2347.83 Sq 1t] Bath Administrative Review 11 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta W_ Living Bedroom 14.6' En Front entrance 16.5' 40 N Carr Street 10TH sa1N Iry,6 Mme,, Inc. Area Glwlatbn. Summa LWlnq Ane Gkulation 0@12118 First Floor 2347.83 Sq It 19.1 x 26.5 = 506.15 33.1x 26.5 = 877.15 31.1 x 27.3 . 849.03 7 x 16.5 = 115.5 Total Living Area (Rounded): 2348 Sq ft Non -living Area 2 Car Attached 556.5 Sq ft 21 x 26.5 = 556.5 C orete Patio 647.5 Sq R 35 x 18.5 647.5 Administrative Review 11 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta View of the side and rear yard looking south from W. 40th Avenue. The addition would extend into the rear yard, behind the large trees from this vantage point, built in line with the south side of the home. Administrative Review IZ Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta View of the eastern edge of the property, with the neighboring house seen to the left. The addition would likely not be visible in this photo due to the trees. The neighbor's house is set back approximately 5 feet from the property line. The visible roofline inside the fence is an existing chicken coop, which will remain. A view from across W. 40'h Avenue looking southeast at the property. The fenced side yard is visible to the right, including a mature tree. The addition would not be visible in this photo, as it would be located behind the existing garage. An addition in the yard adjacent to W. 40I' Avenue is not desirable because of the character and floorplan of the home and existing mature trees. Administrative Review 13 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta i I � 1 ; View into the rear yard from W. 4Wh Avenue. The chicken coop on the left would remain. The structure in the distance, a covered patio, which has 0 -foot setbacks, would be removed to make room for the one-story addition, which would be visible from this perspective. View of the side yard from W. 40'h Avenue. The front yard is visible on the right, which is the Carr Street frontage (just out of view of the photo). Administrative Review 14 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta A; •' View of the front yard from Carr Street. Note the mature trees and established front yard/porch area. The neighbor's garage to the south is located on the right. While the setbacks would allow for an addition in this area, it would highly disrupt the front yard and require a major re -configuration of the front fagade and interior living space. Administrative Review 15 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta EXHIBIT 7: REQUEST Scott Cutler From: Andrew Guerrero <andyrok17@me.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 5:08 PM To: Scott Cutler Cc: Precision Subject: Re: 3990 Carr Variance Attachments: 3990 Carr Home Layout.pdf Hey Scott, I've attached the layout of our house. Hopefully that will work! In response to your other questions as to why we are choosing that area of the house, please see below. We did our best to try and explain why we really need this variance. Again this is an overwhelming process for us, but we hope we can work with the city of Wheat Ridge to meet our family's needs. 1) We don't want to dramatically change the front facade of the home and this is a location that is hidden from the front and wouldn't impact the overall appearance from the street view. With the variance, the new structure would run along the same line as the original house line and would feel more natural. Adding an addition in another area would also impact the overall house layout/flow and could be more costly. 2) We feel like it's the best place for our aging mother and allows her easy access into the shared family room of the main house. There is also a paved area which makes it safer for her to walk and easier for snow removal. Having her in this area also feels like the safest place because it isn't close to the street. 3) Building anywhere else in the backyard area would make the yard less usable and less functional for the family because it would partition the yard. We are also trying to minimize the impact on any existing mature trees in the yard and we have several. 4) This is the best area for plumbing accessibility. We are happy to answer any other questions. Thank you for your help! Andy Rok Guerrero 720.935.5489 www.andyrok.com Administrative Review 16 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta EXHIBIT 8: IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE (ILC) - e DA7EZp,sJ FEL-250,LC- JOB#_ CUExr _awxr-7r;7+ua-as�iAYAi2ARr> AnaRfw'ris ,_,199OygII.. ; LA NO SURVEYING G....MERO 5460 WARD ROAD - $URC 160 ARVAo.)A. CM0111,00 HOOD2 (303) 42Q+T78e LEGAL DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CHR11VICATIE(FIM I""'� CUFNM THE NORTR t/Z OF LIDT 1, Note: TECELEH SOSnrVISIOa, COU ry C,EStIGCate is Hascd On CoIIh9I aS Shown, OF JEFFPa$ON, SPATE OF An Improvetneai Sem Phd is Recommended )IN COLOP&M For Precise location oflmprovements. -1� L Loa110ara3Veee uat[mo.,:.m Aex.a>zde Swk: l' 3U' F.aS W.f R" �r girt/ rf wgs�o.. wW 4M Areae SD e.QN• MM P.d-srI. I (leper 313 .g. 7➢ oees"PAick M.1 rase i LOYI 111 i IV 000mac q, thaws -. e;11dR7 A 1�[IE7 i 1 1 I I O, the bass o' my aAcwledgs, information and belief, I hereby oartHy that efts WMp ernent loostion caNlicate wag p'epan c b' FREC29SON RZMMTIOKS , that it Ig not a Land. Survey Plat or I Wrommenl Survey Plet, and that It to not to be retied upon for the estabuslMWIl of tense. IwAdng, or other future in.prola'reY, Ines. I further cerity that the tlrProvenle'Hfi:: s on e Jfts u rbsd paz-c-i this dais, ekeept ut:ity crreeLors are erhrey withh tho bo-rdaeas of the pane., 9;g as ehxvn. •,:�:_t•,..... are no en:-ucnneru upon ire cesu.� Pre'ruuses dy I-Iwooernarrs O'1 ary sdJoring pee, �, exdept as iNyC�'�'. *W tLW N -t s n� apparent cVlderos or sign o= any easement emssing or t:wrdent:g a -y pert of tfs%"pacei, except as r Mad. x -Gr. ra r.,pwsner. rm:- anNfiwe ie rapo•m e: nt sde r /�- � � � ev a>m. •wm • .or r .ern e+aRr m..a. rrs+wn >u,. A .,... r.&IleP. .i y—wo 1.115 twlmlrryryheim, edsr' �I+oAwrner. RSm�M}yPbL geNtadat6o.n �pil'4'U�+il*iPorr.'rra s .anr -ts re rXee. IU PGR 6ISe?014u.KCs l0Ia E.tbraa nX ac3epkfr- .(4.nmc. rwtla .. e5.d*Mn o:Glbte:onc t,1C5rlri tlmu-ftTx. ACOtrYC:.•51b'usm W(?;'ra>,enri 4'aX CeriSct'e'A a�YR' `a .• i•e4-10 b Al— —w!r� 7 NrAan'.l Onllam.i�0 --YTi®YtlIH al 6fWts41M� PtOi]1a fWbiJ Administrative Review 17 Case No. WA -17-10 /Arienta Scott Cutler From: Andrew Guerrero <andyrok17@me.com> Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 5:08 PM To: Scott Cutler Cc: Precision Subject: Re: 3990 Carr Variance Attachments: 3990 Carr Home Layout.pdf Hey Scott, I've attached the layout of our house. Hopefully that will work! In response to your other questions as to why we are choosing that area of the house, please see below. We did our best to try and explain why we really need this variance. Again this is an overwhelming process for us, but we hope we can work with the city of Wheat Ridge to meet our family's needs. 1) We don't want to dramatically change the front facade of the home and this is a location that is hidden from the front and wouldn't impact the overall appearance from the street view. With the variance, the new structure would run along the same line as the original house line and would feel more natural. Adding an addition in another area would also impact the overall house layout/flow and could be more costly. 2) We feel like it's the best place for our aging mother and allows her easy access into the shared family room of the main house. There is also a paved area which makes it safer for her to walk and easier for snow removal. Having her in this area also feels like the safest place because it isn't close to the street. 3) Building anywhere else in the backyard area would make the yard less usable and less functional for the family because it would partition the yard. We are also trying to minimize the impact on any existing mature trees in the yard and we have several. 4) This is the best area for plumbing accessibility. We are happy to answer any other questions. Thank you for your help! Andy Rok Guerrero 720.935.5489 www.andvrok.com On Aug 25, 2017, at 4:26 PM, Scott Cutler <scutler a,ci.wheatrid e.co.us> wrote: Hi Andy- Would you be able to send me a sketch of the floor plan of your existing house? We're trying to figure ut why you've placed the addition where you did, and why it's shaped the way it is. I'm guessing the floo Ian of the house, and the setup of the yard has something to do with your request. Would you be able to end a floor plan sketch and explanation over when you get a chance? We basically need to prove to our rector that a variance is necessary over other options (like expanding the house towards Carr Street, 40` ve, or in the backyard in a way that would meet all setback requirements). No rush, as I'm abou%o head out of the office for the weekend! -Scott Scott Cutler Planning Technician Office Phone: 303-235-2849 <image001.jpg> From: Scott Cutler Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:37 AM To: 'Andrew Guerrero' <andyrokl7@me. Subject: RE: 3990 Carr Variance Yours isn't ready yet, but I've attached a sample lettxr so you can get an idea. See you tomorrow! Scott Cutler Planning Technician Office Phone: 303-235-2849 <image001.jpg> From: Andrew Guerrero [mailto:andyrokl7@me.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 9:29 AM To: Scott Cutler <scutler@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Re: 3990 Carr Variance Okay no sweat. Can you send me a copy of the letter you will be sending ou�\10 everyone? Andy Rok Guerrero 720.935.5489 www.andyrok.com On Aug 22, 2017, at 7:58 AM, Scott Cutler <scutler a ci.wheatrid eg co.us> wrote: lliY of W heat Ridge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WA -17-10 DEADLINE FOR WRITTEN COMMENTS: September 5, 2017 residing at as the applicant for Case No Public Notice at Andrew Guerrero (name) 3990 Carr Street (address) WA -17-10 hereby certify that I have posted the sign for 3990 Carr Street (location) on this IS day of August and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for ten (10) days prior to and including the deadline for written comments regarding this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Development Department for this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file. MAP F e4, City of /W heatj�idge MUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE August 23, 2017 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA -17-10, a request for approval of a 5 -foot (50%) variance from the minimum rear yard setback requirement of 10 -feet for an addition on property located at 3990 Carr Street and zoned Residential -Two (R-2). The attached aerial photo identifies the location of the variance request. The applicant for this case is requesting a variance eligible for administrative review per section 26-115.0 of the Municipal Code to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adiacent property owners are required to be notified of the request. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on September 5, 2017. Thank you. wAl7l0.doc www.ci.w heatridge.co.0 s 04065'. I � Odp55 ,�► _ r 04035 a. c 04025 I 20 08295 03950 04015] 03920 r 40TH AVE 040 1 P3939 SALAS RICHARD R HAHN SUNNY RENEE FISHER COREY J FALGIEN BRIANNE N SWAIN SUSAN E ROMANO MARY ANN 04055 CARR ST 08295 W 40TH AVE 04025 CARR ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SCHAEFER ALICIA R 04020 CARR ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 DOMENICK MICHAEL A DOMENICK MARILYN A 03950 CARR ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 GUTIERREZ IRENE 08220 W 40TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 STEEL JEFFREY ROSS 04035 CARR ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Cily of W heat I idyc OMMUNHY NV1101'101NI Submittal Checklist: Variance Project Name: ���` ��� l�dC) �iC) Project Location: Qf 0 s: G qy�-- r( Rev. 512014 Application Contents: A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. The following items represent a complete variance application: 01. Completed, notarized land yse application form 0�-k-yr\kD2- C-2. Application fee ,�) u1� T3. Signed submittal checklist (this document) �4. Proof of ownership—e.g. deed 0 e7tL- 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s) ©wNE� _6. Wri n request and description of the proposal Include a response to the variance review criteria—these are found in Section /16-115 of the municipal code Include an explanation as to why alternate designs that may comply with the zoning standards are not feasible V / Include an explanation of the unique physical hardship that necessitates relief `� 7. Surveyor Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property -� To -scale site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks 99. Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. 1 fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT b distributed for City review. In addition,/ understand that in the event any revisions need to be ma after the second (2"d) full review, 1 will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. - Signature: Date. r t� Name (please print): l ; e --� Phone:,? Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 - www.ci.wheatridge.co.us 8.18.2017 To Whom It May Concern: I Andrew Guerrero owner of the property on 3990 Carr Street, Wheat Ridge CO 80033, here give authority and permission to Kyle Arienta of Precision Renovations to act on my Behalf with the City of Wheat Ridge in regard to all issues with Renovation of our home. I give Kyle permission to act an agent of behalf of me the home owner. Andrew Guerrero 3990 Carr Street Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Andyrokl7@me.com Phone: 720.935.5489 Contact for Kyle Arienta Kyte Arienta Precision Renovations LLC www.precision-renovations.com (0) 303.333.3123 (F) 303.322.0266 (C) 720.854.4744 F A Case No. o52_e511 D96 I_ Page 36_ Building Sketch Borrower Guerrero. Andrew & Ann P Property Address 3990 Carr St City Wheat Ridge — _-- -- _--_ - County Jefferson---_ -- State CO __----lip Code 80033 LenderCllem Paramount Equity Mortgage Form SKT.BLDSKI - "TOTAL° appraisal software by a la mode, Inc. - 1 -800-ALAMODE 18.5' Covered Patio Concrete Patio m u [647.5 Sq ft] Open Patio 1' 18.5 Storage in rn Family N m 2 Car Attached [556.5 Sq ft] JIM 7 Bedroom 21' Mud Rm Bath in N 4\ Ifl n `a Kitchen Laundry 2' Bedroom Dining First Floor [2347.83 Scl ft] Bath w Living Bedroom 14.6' 16.5' mru sk.m, W • u mod., inc Area calculations Summary Living Arae Calculation DeteRs First Floor 2347.83 Sq ft 19.1 x 26.5 = 506.15 33.1 x 26.5 = 877.15 31.1 x 27.3 = 849.03 7 x 16.5 - 115.5 Total Living Area (Rounded): 2348 Sq }t Non-livrrq Area 2 Car Attached 556.5 Sq ft 21 x 26.5 = 556.5 Concrete Patio 647.5 Sq ft 35 x 18.5 = 647.5 Form SKT.BLDSKI - "TOTAL° appraisal software by a la mode, Inc. - 1 -800-ALAMODE H M O M BM V) O O t� bo to UO 0 a, y � bA M .b a Cd co e a� a� 3 �U ° i Z�i3 W vU r. w oA y; '~ o ami ccz .� 0co r. bD aoi i1... P�., ' ~ T❑ by >~ In v bo r A O N >,0 » . to vi 7� n aNibo c°d r`7 p b N W �a?, ins o op cd O o -d y y id N Y 'C ►�" v' >, M by a> Q rn `� ° 0 vi CC! Y U 3 Y o r y U co cd 4-. Y .—.Y O ai bb moi, y o aa) w !tci Y ° o. •.. a, ° O o .., o a� 'b uj > w as Y 'ii a+ •U 'O y yS 4 o 'd a! V) o cd ^d . o .r 0 3 b '0 cd o b o> o id F�+ Q1 Y m •� ^ CA V1 C's VI bU U =0 3 0.aoi -00 $ 0 p o a� co 4r 'v 0 a) W, 6 w 3 "t7 O abi ° w 0 0 0 Y o w L 'O O C U U 4: bo O o °O O CY0 O sU, y O v� cd CIS O •00 ; O. - y O w m U G y y �' �'O 03 a� :� W" U Z r. y 0 .OU b OA ¢ y 0 A y a> o y bq a� Y O .o Y o 42 00 0 0 °�two z a �-d o A> 3 0' v� 3 o x 3 apiF� 'tg)� �, O Q v o v cd a O 0 -o ° w 3 Y w M •U ,fl ¢ OI �' ... N OD Y W .0 w O C U N O iC � �'L " 0 w> kw� L Cd 'D.d .0 O W r- =0 O 00 p ' LO r2 o cc °0 a)O Q oE COT ZO aQi� zWzH Jg W >v Q.�Yno�°W ►�. '" W V Q c°i o V +°- °= Y x `� ami 's• bo° C7 ci °= o 4-, '� Y 'x ac°icd Y A. U 0 U cn a ea NW Cmi Eataib nob Riyj l or Wry a SEowa Mhs14M Avg SU RLO.W. Food F No./111 I I LOT 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 LF11W On the basis of my knowledge, information and belief, I hereby certify that this improvement location certificate was prepared for PRECISION RENOVATIONS , that it is not a Land Survey Plat or Improvement Survey Plat, and that R is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or other future improvement lines. I further certify that the improvements on the escrl pare this date, except utility connections, are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, a as shown, t are noNencroachments upon the described premises by Improvements on any adjoining pre , except as in ed, and that is no apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any part of s parcel, except as ted. J„TICE T Irrpro:crnel; iaca9on —tificite ie pimp— tcW V,e 4' Sc of uY. DY p0'bCe 6SHt6a rc <' B9Caal.en property wrxrs prop�R, 4n- A„xae pretax rr�t�an:shp a Cue irnp-rnt cn :s to ft bo :ndan lines can be oete.m: an IrrgtraeenrJ.^, Survzy Wt:t. Irr 4 i sittwc�i es sAa�n on y appanv. itrprvrenta^M a u a�craa:hm, L� aye noted. R.E. PORT S ASSOCI7+TES INC a',tl Re E. Par, will not IiaWe to - y Location . and this only to t'x carom spect�caf}' show- t,reaa A:tYp1a11', anoEOr U9B of t Itr,M:riemeM L ✓N rerhfi0s;e'.o• arry ;s * 2,'�eercent to ali t a'aed hereon Nor[ 8URYEY m aRnr/N uswc HJITTF� AAIaIEE OR BEARPIGfi �11a dlt®IbrOM6 or CLJETfT �.R;i6�SFHN RY,IJ9Vh�'iFBiS AAORM-5.__j44A—GPRR--6TR8R-T L A N D S U R V E Y I N G NAME AIW L ANDREW 0-- 5460 WARD ROAD • SUITE 160 ARVAD.A, COLORADO BOOM (303) 420-4788 LEGAL DESCRIPTION IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE(PER CLIENT) F —T, E NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 1, j.]p[6: TEGELER SUBDIVISION, COUNTY r Certificate is PAsW on Control as Shown, OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF An Improvement Survey Plat is Recommended COLORADO For Precisc Location of Improvements. r,a>mm afFmce Liors ifSbwn ae Agroaimft - Fmot tsa Scale: 1"=30' NW Cmi Eataib nob Riyj l or Wry a SEowa Mhs14M Avg SU RLO.W. Food F No./111 I I LOT 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 LF11W On the basis of my knowledge, information and belief, I hereby certify that this improvement location certificate was prepared for PRECISION RENOVATIONS , that it is not a Land Survey Plat or Improvement Survey Plat, and that R is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or other future improvement lines. I further certify that the improvements on the escrl pare this date, except utility connections, are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, a as shown, t are noNencroachments upon the described premises by Improvements on any adjoining pre , except as in ed, and that is no apparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening any part of s parcel, except as ted. J„TICE T Irrpro:crnel; iaca9on —tificite ie pimp— tcW V,e 4' Sc of uY. DY p0'bCe 6SHt6a rc <' B9Caal.en property wrxrs prop�R, 4n- A„xae pretax rr�t�an:shp a Cue irnp-rnt cn :s to ft bo :ndan lines can be oete.m: an IrrgtraeenrJ.^, Survzy Wt:t. Irr 4 i sittwc�i es sAa�n on y appanv. itrprvrenta^M a u a�craa:hm, L� aye noted. R.E. PORT S ASSOCI7+TES INC a',tl Re E. Par, will not IiaWe to - y Location . and this only to t'x carom spect�caf}' show- t,reaa A:tYp1a11', anoEOr U9B of t Itr,M:riemeM L ✓N rerhfi0s;e'.o• arry ;s * 2,'�eercent to ali t a'aed hereon Nor[ 8URYEY m aRnr/N uswc HJITTF� AAIaIEE OR BEARPIGfi �11a dlt®IbrOM6 or i `1 NA a a a WA r� r fi a WA City of Wheat kid 9811612017 1Id ZONING Air}CDRb LICATIUN FE`G CDD816. FM5D ZONINGAFF�� LICATItiN FEE; AMOUNT PAYMENT RECEIVED 200.09 CHECK: 1066 TOTAL AMOUNT ----------------x'99.00 --- - _ 209.00 41submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a City Of planner. Incomplete applications will nc i�9rWh6atWideye V, be accepted—refer to submittal checldisi LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) nn f f k-, I � pi,,-'ct5ic e� , Applicant-�` +5' C o &vA Vrc � '"3 Phone 92C '559 1(74 �fEmail `e4ic aar fjci? 5 . cc�:� Address, City, State, Zip ' qLf pT I j c o 6L VPoVP--' 00;7 3 r /� \ Vwner � - nC, f -e ;�J Gj 1^ e C c e r'0 Phone -7153 .3 5'- rq�-q Email ;g I -D Address, City, State, Zip 391 1 Cc i -r SL-) 9� 3 1 fttj— Contact V -44t Sp ont � rh�il(C t Address, City, State, Zip (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): 13 COO 61. CU-rc 5 Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): O Change of Zone or Zone Conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision - specify type: O Planned Development (ODP, SDP) O Conditional Use Permit O Administrative (up to 3 lots) O Planned Building Group O Site Plan O Minor (4 or 5 lots) O Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Concept Plan O Major (6 or more lots) O Variance/Waiver (from Section 26-) O Right of Way Vacation O Other: f Detailed description of request: PsS [ � FU U Q-�j� l CA-) f T (( no P6,3 erJ a c)d, I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. OZOZ `ZZ'II2Idd S3XId}3 NOISSIWWOO AW Notarized Signature of Applicant ii'h/� 18K l0D910Z (JI AWH.L0N State of Colorado OQ� 0g00 d0 uws} ss OI'IH[ld A�IH.LOI1 County of Ste- >� KdSQO a dwwL The foAegoipg instrument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged by me this day of 20 by JeA N aoN ry Public To be filled out by staff: Date received Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. Assessor's Parcel No.�f Size (acres or sgft) 4 L:6-2 Rev 1/22/ 2016 My commission expires `l / ZZ/20ZW Fee $ �200,0 Receipt No. C I) fj U i P (a Pre -App Mtg. Date Current Zoning &es a CNI : s. Ta -Jr> 2 Proposed Zoning Case No. JjA- I I - it) Quarter Section Map Case Manager [ 1 .t l e r - Current Use Proposed Use