Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WA-17-14
t4( City of Wheat dge ___?IeFOMmUNiTY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building June 5, 2018 Nicole Schaefer 2920 Ward Court Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 Ms. Schaefer: 7500 W. 29t' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 3.03.235.2857 This letter is in regard to your request for approval of an extension of the variance granted pursuant to Case No. WA -17-14. On November 17, 2017, you were granted a 2.5 -foot variance from the 5 -foot side yard setback requirement for the construction of a shed addition, on property zoned Residential -Two (R-2) and located at 2920 Ward Court. Pursuant to Section 26-115.C.4, extensions for good cause shown may be approved by the Community Development Director if a request is made in writing prior to the expiration date of the variance approval. The Community Development Department acknowledges your request for extension received May 30, 2018 and hereby grants an extension for 180 days. Please be advised that if a building permit is not obtained by Monday, December 3, 2018 your variance will expire. Sincerely, Kenneth Johnstone, AICP Community Development Director cc: Case File WA -17-14 www.ci.wh eatridgexom s City of f' l W heat P, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 November 17, 2017 Joseph & Nicole Schaefer 2910 Ward Ct. Wheat Ridge, CO 80215 Re: Case No. WA -17-14 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Schaefer: Please be advised that your request for a 2.5 -foot (50%) variance from the 5 -foot side yard setback requirement for a residential addition on property zoned Residential -Two (R-2) and located at 2920 Ward Court has been approved. Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance. Please note that all variance requests automatically expire within 180 days (May 16, 2018) of the date it was granted unless a building permit for the variance has been obtained within such period of time. You are now welcome to apply for a building permit. Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions. Sincerely, Tammy Odean Administrative Assistant Enclosure: Approval of Variance Case Report Cc: WA -17-14 (case file) WA1714.doc NN N%n xLiN heatridge.co.us 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 City of W h6 at P iAle 11*� Approval of Variance WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 2920 Ward Court referenced as Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a 2.5 -foot (50%) variance from the required 5 -foot side yard setback for residential additions on property zoned Residential -Two (Case No. WA -17- 14 / Schaefer) is granted for the property located at 2920 Ward Court, based on the following findings of fact: The variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 2. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 3. Existing conditions on the property present a particular and unique hardship. 4. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification period. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the addition be similar in character to the existing house and consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. th Johnstone, AY P unity DevelopnIent Director 1 Da IV 6 4 41 City of Wh6atl<iL�jge TO: CASE MANAGER: "u I �l ACTION REQUESTED CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT Community Development Director Scott Cutler WA -17-14 / Schaefer DATE: October 30, 3017 Approval of a 2.5 -foot (50%) variance from the 5 -foot side yard setback requirement, allowing an addition to be constructed on property located at 2920 Ward Court and zoned Residential -Two (R-2). LOCATION OF REQUEST: 2920 Ward Court APPLICANT/OWNER: APPROXIMATE AREA: PRESENT ZONING PRESENT LAND USE Nicole and Joseph Schaefer 9,552 square feet (0.219 acres) Residential -Two (R-2) Single Family Residential ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE Location Map LAKEMOD Site JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a 2.5 -foot (50%) variance from the 5 -foot side yard setback requirement for structures in the Residential -Two (R-2) zone district. The purpose of this variance is to allow for the homeowner to construct a 14 -foot by 8 -foot storage room addition on the south side of their property, next to the existing attached garage. Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of the standard. II. CASE ANALYSIS The variance is being requested so the property owner may construct an attached storage room along the southern portion of their home. The property is located on the east side of Ward Court between W. 291h Avenue and W. 31St Avenue (Exhibit 1) in the Maple Grove Village Blocks 2-10 Subdivision. The existing single-family house sits on a 9,552 square foot parcel and was constructed in 1960 per the Jefferson County Assessor. The property is zoned Residential -Two (R-2), as are all of the surrounding properties on Ward Court, W. 29th Avenue, and W. 31St Avenue (Exhibit 2). Lena Gulch borders the property on the east, and properties to the east of Lena Gulch are zoned Residential -One (R-1). The City of Lakewood lies one property to the south, the border being W. 29th Avenue. The surrounding land uses are primarily single-family homes. The R-2 zone district provides for high quality, safe, quiet and stable low to moderate -density residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of any nature which are incompatible with the low to moderate -density residential character. The R-2 zone district requires 5 -foot side setbacks. The proposed addition will therefore encroach upon this required setback, prompting the request for a 2.5 - foot variance from the side setback (50%). The primary reason for the variance request is the immediate need for additional storage space coupled with lack of other possible locations on the property. The applicant has a growing family, with a child on the way and elderly parents moving in. The proposed location (Exhibit 3) is along the southern side of the home, next to the attached garage. The topography of the site and the position of the home on the lot limit feasible locations of additions or outbuildings. The topography and floodway map (Exhibit 4) shows the steep slope from the side of the home to the edge of the property at the east. The Lena Gulch floodway is located just to the east of the rear property line. The topo lines, shown at intervals of 1 -foot, show the terraced sides of the yard, which create a bowl -shaped backyard. The existing deck accesses the rear yard by way of a staircase, as the backyard is approximately 7 feet lower than the front yard. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer The site photographs provided indicate the current conditions of the property (Exhibit 5). The addition is partially constructed, and was discovered by a building inspector, who placed a Stop Work Order on the property for a basement demolition and finish without a permit. The basement scope of work was approved through a building permit on October 30, 2017. The storage room is under 120 square feet. If it was detached it would not require a building permit, but because it is tied into the existing home as an addition, a permit will be required. While the addition is not likely a substantial investment, it will provide additional storage for a growing household. In combination with the basement remodel, the homeowners are making an overall investment that is substantial, and will improve the functionality of the property. Development Standards The parcel meets minimum standards for the R-2 zone district. The proposed addition meets all requirements for the R-2 zone district besides the side setback requirement. The following table compares the required R-2 development standards with the actual and proposed conditions: R-2 Development Standards: Required Actual Lot Area 7,500 square feet min 9,552 square feet Lot Width 75 feet 84 feet Building Coverage 40% (max) 24.8% with addition) One -Family Dwelling: Required Proposed Addition Height 35 feet (max at roof midpoint) 8 feet Side Setback (south) 5 feet (min) 2.5 feet Front Setback (west) 25 feet (min) —30 feet (in-line with house) Public Noticing Period During the 10 -day public notification period, staff received two phone inquiries, including a call of support from the resident to the east. No written objections were received regarding the variance request. III. VARIANCE CRITERIA In order to approve a variance, the Board of Adjustment must determine that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been met. The applicant has provided a short analysis of the application's compliance with the variance criteria (Exhibit 6). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the variance criteria. 1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in which it is located. If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The property would continue to function as a single-family residence, regardless of the outcome of the variance request. However, the family would be limited in their storage capacity for the three additional residents. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. A variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. The R-2 zone district allows additions of the proposed size and height. The existing single-family home is set back approximately 30 feet from the property line along Ward Court, and the storage room will be set back from the street a couple of feet further. The roof will slope down from 9 feet to 7 feet, matching the pitch of the existing roof. At 8 feet wide, it will have little visual impact on the surrounding area. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application, which would not be possible without the variance. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property, including a basement remodel, which is consistent with the Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy. The proposed addition is the only portion of this investment which requires a variance. An addition would be possible without a variance, but the 5 -foot setback requirement would require the addition to be 2.5 feet narrower, making it approximately 5.5 feet wide. While a smaller addition could still be used for storage, it would significantly reduce the functionality of the storage area and accessibility of the space. Staff finds this criterion has not been met. 4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried out. Exhibit 3 indicates the proposed location of the addition, and Exhibit 4 shows the topography of the property. The rear yard has steep terraces on either side, and the middle portion is set significantly lower than the front of the house. Stairs up from the yard allow access to the deck and rear door. An addition could not feasibly be located anywhere else on the property unless the existing rear deck was removed and a storage room built in its place. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. The applicant created their own hardship by starting construction on the addition without verifying setback requirements or obtaining a building permit. However, the applicant did not build the home in its current position and has no control over the topography of the side and rear yards. These physical hardships would have existed regardless of whether the applicant had started the work prematurely. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 /Schaefer Staff finds this criterion has been met. 6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or impairing property values within the neighborhood. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result of this request. The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction to motorists on the adjacent streets, and would not increase the danger of fire. It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood. Staff finds this criterion has been met. 7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. The property in question is the same size and width as the other properties on Ward Court (Exhibit 7, Subdivision). Many of the homes have a similar floor plan and are built at or near the required side setbacks, which limits expansion on the sides. The homes are pushed back on the lots, limiting expansion to the rear of the property. Because of the proximity of the neighborhood to Lena Gulch, several properties on the east side of Ward Court and west side of Vivian Street have topographical challenges. Staff finds that this criterion has been met. 8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with disabilities. Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities. Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. 9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling units, or their associated accessory buildings. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer Staff finds this criterion is not applicable. IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Having found the application in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff recommends APPROVAL of a 2.5 -foot (50%) variance from the required 5 -foot side yard setback for residential additions in the R-2 zone. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request that would warrant approval of a variance. Therefore, staff recommends approval for the following reasons: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. 2. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 3. Existing conditions on the property present a particular and unique hardship. 4. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property. 5. No objections were received regarding the variance request during the public notification period. With the following conditions: 1. The design and architecture of the addition be similar in character to the existing house and consistent with representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 /Schaefer EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 /Schaefer EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP 03138 03115 03110 030964 Cily of flip W heat �cige � R # F Geographic 03100 Information Systems 75 12415 03109 ±` 03100 03092 k' Legend 11S Q Subject Property �.....i Wheat Ridge City Limits 70 12410 03090 03098 03088 City of Lakewood V 0 Residential -One (R-1) - 050 03015 Q 03010 Residential -Two (R-2) 03079 03068 '# 03000 03015 o3oio 03005 ��"" I �� 03059 ~ U) 03048 02980 _ Q 12505 02980 02985 °J 7 It.f" 03029 vn' 02960. 03018 29TH PL 02955 02960 om�: "02940 ., 02979 12520 12500 ifto 02968 02920 � 12515- 12485 AVE........ ........................... 02900 LAKEWOOD 02949 02948 Administrative Review 8 Case No. WA -17-14 /Schaefer State Plane Coordinate Prgaclion N Colorado Central Zo„e Datum: NAD83 ` N Administrative Review 8 Case No. WA -17-14 /Schaefer EXHIBIT 3: SITE PLAN Note: The property lines on this photo are provided by the Jefferson County Assessor and are +/- 5 feet in accuracy. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer E EXHIBIT 4: TOPOGRAPHY & FLOODWAY The yard slopes steeply down to Lena Gulch, approximately 6 feet down from the house to property line. The back yard is sloped with terraces across the sides. The front and side yards are relatively flat. The floodway is located just to the east of the property line. Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer 10 EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS i� •� k View of the partially -constructed shed looking west towards Ward Court, from the side yard. The completed shed would be lower than the existing roofline. (photo provided by applicant) Another view of the partially -constructed shed looking east towards the backyard. The yard slopes down from the existing chain link fence. The applicant has placed a tarp on the shed while the variance case is being processed. (photo provided by applicant) Administrative Review 11 Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer ,•, S r f a i i� •� k View of the partially -constructed shed looking west towards Ward Court, from the side yard. The completed shed would be lower than the existing roofline. (photo provided by applicant) Another view of the partially -constructed shed looking east towards the backyard. The yard slopes down from the existing chain link fence. The applicant has placed a tarp on the shed while the variance case is being processed. (photo provided by applicant) Administrative Review 11 Case No. WA -17-14 / Schaefer owl "r. 4 A view of the addition looking northeast towards the subject property. The addition would line up with the front of the garage, and the side would be set back 2.5 feet from the property line. Administrative Review 12 Case No. WA -17-14 /Schaefer EXHIBIT 6: WRITTEN REQUEST .w�. ... s.- . .r . .O O.; —aawwjwl1w• •• c'1 So w -c, Wo t,i di on i br o -b Ir +0 bLA i id vn srv� f spce G1 ccvrtr-v of #ham \-J&Vu - } kmvcve," �+ wDud VDC neXf- Ab 1 �1'1PCS51 U -C c�G+ rr�a�ir�ls `7 lawY, erg u-x.p r.,,cr�f-o 41 down ire b CL L.a,Gst opi- oyl vv o tot % 90-rden ak-w ; neat° -Pro n+ CSW r 1Ajowct LOO iL v'evl) awAjVtI'C�� p� In �s S . Y�l� i(� i/l ours Vv p isl.i OL Irl at I kc �-o Ct &O y- -Tint ani OLV Coy. 1l,'� lrla v� G1v `� 4-0 W ac.L (oL VDC. hC)(4 4 Qr or r, of +�Ve P* DP er, 9 age O�tafns �� W� Dave oXpitsr-�ct oa i 1 Y�.i� -�-� iS lc�, � a� � ha\/ �9 C� baps ul M� `�vnck,� G�a� 5L�-1t� vU-f'. (iy� e VJ L We -aye, o lso nio v � Yr►� h u�� �+ ���� o fs hr r� A--p,.v, t o �p� �� cL�-� -�o `�,, ►-� r-Oorn , 4't r -n I Iry 1 11 �� 4hung wif-hou-+ C 8htA. Administrative Review 13 Case No. WA -17-14 /Schaefer I ---------- EXHIBIT 7: SUBDIVISION MAPLE GROVE VILLAGE BLOCKS 2 THROUGH /0 M A Lr' S �54 14 ZN It 41 4 cl to T L i x 4 �7 TA X4"r' 7 IR 3 14 6 a ikos- J V� ok. 5 AWS I ;p. is N a 23 ze 35 1� < 4 �hh� y3 b 3 34 3 16 20 —2kLL- M 6 lrj I'M A, IWX ,Yea - I T - -W — 644' I. W ftsy� NOTES RPM,, o.' A, Aor Arl AVsw. Pr 4,f /,:-w6 e4 - Administrative Review Case No. WA -17-14 ISchaefer W. 29 21 IM 12 13 14 6 41 r�c I 'c 4r ev" ;,IT U)sDr-Ac c *-ZFLA C EY �" Lmo, GKELRl%Q SOW 14 US POSTAGE edge $ 00.469 enue ti First -Class D 80033-8001 Mailed From 80033 10/31/2017 -63-2-A 0061829455 VANDAVEER GERALDINE 02979 VIVIAN ST WHEAT RIDGE C- N p F 1- i1 rT 0%011 AI1 7 vAWDAV;-mK GERALDI-KE N V -K. M? A-1-4 ISA j( 6. 0 b If - b U:L:i, p City of Wheat jdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE October 31, 2017 Dear Property Owner: This is to inform you of Case No. WA -17-14, a request for approval of a 2 1/2 -foot (50%) variance from the minimum side yard setback requirement of 5 -feet for a shed on property located at 2920 Ward Court and zoned Residential -Two (R-2). The attached aerial photo identifies the location of the variance request. The applicant for this case is requesting a variance eligible for administrative review per section 26-115.0 of the Municipal Code to be granted by the Zoning Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in writing by 5:00 p.m. on November 9, 2017. Thank you. WA17114.doc www.d.w heatridge.co. u s KING KENNETH W KING ELAINE R VANDAVEER GERALDINE CLAUSEN JAMES K CLAUSEN JACK W 02949 VIVIAN ST 02979 VIVIAN ST 02940 WARD CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 HEINY CHRISTOPHER JAMES HEINY PAMELA 02935 WARD CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 HALEY ANTHONY W 13400 W 16TH DR GOLDEN CO 80401 ABBOTT DARRION ABBOTT TRACI 02915 WARD CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80215 City of W heatidgC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Submittal Checklist: Variance Project Name: God, Project Location: Rev. 5/2014 Application Contents: A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a unique physical hardship is present. The following items represent a complete variance application: Completed, notarized land use application form Application fee _ Signed submittal checklist (this document) ✓ 4. Proof of ownership—e.g. deed WaS. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s) 6. Written request and description of the proposal Include a response to the variance review criteria—these are found in Section 26-115 of the municipal code Include an explanation as to why alternate designs that may comply with the zoning standards are not feasible Include an explanation of the unique physical hardship that necessitates relief 7. Surveyor Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property .- _8. To -scale site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks _9. Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme City of Wheat Ridge 10/2/2017 12:35 CDBA ZONING APPLICATION FEES CDA017240 AMOUNT FMSD ZONING APPLICATION FLES 200.00 PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT NC / 0501 200.00 AUTH CODE: 023447 TOTAL 200,00 As applicant for this project, 1 hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. l fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, l understand that in the event any revisions need to be made after the second (2"d) full review, 1 will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. Signature. ' Date: f J I I Name (please print):tt�oI 5K Phone: � � 3'i e5'94Z;� Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 - www.d.wheatridge.co.us Return To: "T1AA-CREF `I*rust Company, FSB Attn: Collateral 'Team - P1111, 1500 Solana Blvd, Bldg. 6, Suite 6200, Westlake 'I'X 76262 Prepared By: Tiandra Gaskin c/o PHH Mortgage, 1 Mortgage Way, Mount Laurel, NJ 08054 (Space,Ibove'1'Iris tine For Recording; D.1t31 DEED OF TRUST MIN 101035671431017931 Cie L DEFINITIONS Words used in multiple sections of this document are defined below and other words are defined in Sections 3, 11, 13, 18, 20 and 21. Certain rules regarding the usage of words used in this document are also provided in Section 16. (A) "Security Instrument" means this document, which is dated July 23, 2016 together with all Riders to this document. (B) "Borrower" is Joseph Otto Michael Sehacfe" h 36Y�e-�� f i� cz SeV)ae.he t 1 V �V.,f Borrower is the trustor under this Security Instrument. (C) "I.ender" is TIAA-CRF.F "Trust Company, FSIs Lender is a Federal Savings Bank 7143101793 COLORADO -Single Family -Fannie N1ao/Froddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT WITH NIERS Form 3006 1101 I 1OTRa/�J'a r� NOTE: Land use applications must be submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a L IIy Of planner. Incomplete applications will not ��WheatKidgc be accepted—refer to submittal checklists. LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant �N t W}1 G Address, City, State, Zip P' on e -Vc �i 3''f 4 email 10 k'col-f l,. 7lXYiiC''1ZJitLw o, l Phone -71 990-- Lf Email Contact h Phone -190 �a"1ttmail , ' 'La C Address, City, State, Zip WCU'(X , (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): O Change of Zone or Zone Conditions O Special Use Permit O Subdivision — specify type: O Planned Development (ODP, SDP) O Conditional Use Permit O Administrative (up to 3 lots) O Planned Building Group O Site Plan O Minor (4 or 5 lots) 71 Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Concept Plan O Major (6 or more lots) lkVariance/Waiver (from Section 26- O Right of Way Vacation O Other: Detailed description of request: pen jl�,A " +0 hu- i Id ehcd on f>0ilf i -i sid r Of—house- L) 1f1t�+� C�ny(�f`iP. ' � YlCty�', -�'it� f�0'' t� i(.�fi1C�t1S ��x� n©►rlt'� ii'� t 1 �i'�t. rh I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Notarized Signature of Applicant State of Colorado_ } ss County of The foregoing instrument (Land Use Processing Application) was acknowledged by me thisc>3 day of Ck, 20� by rycxole Scl. c�e�'c� 7 IAYtAESUE MCRIMMON My commission expires J / /20/ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID # 20154009457 My r XPIRrS MARCH 06. 201 To be filled out by staff: Date received (�% �3 - (-] Fee $ - )p,06 Case No. W 0 - I 1- Comp Plan Design. Receipt No. CDAOI !—')IVO Quarter Section Map Related Case No. Pre -App Mtg. Dat Case Manager Assessor's Parcel No. / Current Zoning Current Use �5; Size (acres or sgft)cj5S2 t't Proposed Zoning Proposed Use Rev 1'22/2016 WC VVOLL[Cii On t� bC OJDiC +0 JDLAI Id (_n 5rVIO-1 I sf_ywco L'" Crvr�y c5f Avl\_JCtyd 4,- f -f \N OU j�l b c -vo rv_ i IG tovol.1-1 r Lu_pvy)cy-yj-- 41 L-Oe,5t(01 tc octrC[Cn Os -ecu nccv -Pron+ (too \,,\ICWCL �ooic_'Ve_vl) RW*A�vcufl �Oj,,yjpert U) -W) is 5 f5exce 'ne igVlIDCq-G \A4()LA_ioff. V, 0+ 5c=t. CL Sr, �+ Cha is -� hco- \N %C -c c 4-0 Lt CC bf, hC)c-f 4-0 51 c of -f-hr-, h©F-,�-r*tA \N e, h el v c c tble \N,r C YJC C CCMj+jOnG_A ha b \Ne- ave, ck I e6- o ni C) h n -I t 0 VVCL, .4t noorn .-For- tv