Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Council Agenda Packet 02-12-18
AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING February 12, 2018 7:00 p.m. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Sara Spaulding, Public Information Officer, at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS APPROVAL OF Council Minutes of January 8, 2018 and January 22, 2018, Study Session Notes of December 18, 2017 and Special Study Session Notes of January 8, 2018 PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES Heart Healthy Week Proclamation CITIZENS’ RIGHT TO SPEAK a. Citizens, who wish, may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of 3 minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster. b. Citizens who wish to speak on Agenda Items, please sign the GENERAL AGENDA ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is called to be heard. c. Citizens who wish to speak on Study Session Agenda Items, please sign the STUDY SESSION AGENDA ROSTER. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA a) Resolution 10-2018 – amending the Fiscal Year 2018 Budget to reflect the approval of a Supplemental Budget Appropriation for the Re-Appropriation and Re-Encumbrance of 2017 Fiscal Year Encumbered Funds in the amount of $3,814,603.10 b) Motion to approve payment to Kaiser Permanente for January 2018 Membership Billing in the amount of $195,189.45 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: February 12, 2018 Page -2- CONSENT AGENDA cont. c) Motion to award a contract, and approve subsequent payments, to Daiz Construction Group, Lakewood, CO in the amount of $347,392 with a contingency amount of $34,740 for the 2017 Miscellaneous Street and Drainage Project d) Resolution 11-2018 – amending the Fiscal Year 2017 General Fund Budget to reflect the approval of a Supplemental Budget Appropriation in the amount of $122,327.90 for on-call Building Permit Inspections, Plan Review and other Support Services and related costs. e) Motion to make an appointment to fill a vacancy on the Board of Adjustment, District II, term to expire 3/02/20 f) Motion to appoint Wanda Sang and Nancy Snow to the Election Commission PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 2. Council Bill 01-2018– approving the rezoning of property located on the West of Interstate-70, between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) (Case No. WZ-16-07/Clear Creek Crossing) CONTINUANCE REQUESTED TO MARCH 26, 2018 ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING 3. Council Bill 04-2018 – amending Sections 11-291 and 11-401 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning the Authorized Activities of Marijuana Testing Facilities DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTION 4. Motion to approve a contract in an amount not to exceed $825,000 to Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. for ongoing Building Permit, Plan Review and Inspection Services and authorizing all subsequent payments CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS ADJOURNMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING January 8, 2018 Mayor Starker called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Monica Duran Zachary Urban Janeece Hoppe George Pond Kristi Davis Tim Fitzgerald Larry Mathews Leah Dozeman Also present: City Clerk, Janelle Shaver; City Treasurer, Jerry DiTullio; City Attorney, Jerry Dahl; City Manager, Patrick Goff; Police Chief Daniel Brennan;; Community Development Director, Ken Johnstone; other staff, guests and interested citizens. APPROVAL OF Minutes of the Council Meetings of November 13, 2017, November 27, 2017 and December 11, 2017 and the Study Session Notes of November 20, 2017 and December 4, 2017 There being no objections, the minutes of the regular meetings of November 13, 2017, November 27, 2017 and December 11, 2017 and the Study Session Notes of November 20, 2017 and December 4, 2017 were approved as published. PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES Wheat Ridge High School Poms 4A State Champions Mayor Starker welcomed the Wheat Ridge High School Poms team to the dais. Councilmember Hoppe read congratulations to the team for winning the 4A state championship. Coaches Caitlin Orms and Brittany Griffin were present with the team. Ms. Orms spoke about the duties and training for the team. They will be going to Nationals in Florida February 1-5. CITIZENS RIGHT TO SPEAK Dorothy Archer (WR) addressed the 35ft height allowance in R1-C. She talked about how Council is not listening to the citizens. A suggested moratorium was ignored. She reported that Edgewater has changed their height limit to 25 ft. She has grave concerns. Council has not addressed Zone 1 or Zone 2 and they have ignored 100 signatures. She pointed out this a small area. To the assertion that we have to change so people will move here, she noted that houses in District 1 have no problem selling; people from north Denver are coming here because they are sad at what’s happening to them. Council needs to know this issue isn’t going to go away. Mark Bowman (WR) requested the city address accessory dwelling units at a study session in the near future. Englewood is having this discussion and 88% of the people who have participated in their discussion support ADU’s. Our City should look at what other cities are doing. Bob Brazell donated his time to Michale Illo. Michael Illo (WR) commented on the study session about height limits for houses. People were well-informed and it was clear what people wanted – to preserve their property values, lifestyle, access to sunlight, etc. He mentioned the 100 signatures in support of a 25 ft limit for houses in their district. He explained that 25 ft is enough to accommodate a 2-story structure, and noted the Planning Director expressed willingness to compromise. He pointed out several flaws with the survey: • It had not one question specific to R1-C neighborhoods. • It was not verifiable, i.e. anyone from anywhere could fill out the survey. • People could take the survey multiple times. He doesn’t believe the legislative process should be based in information that is not verifiable and is irrelevant. He suggested the process needs to continue so that real citizen concerns can be addressed. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA a) Motion to approve payment to Faris Machinery Company of Commerce City, CO, for one 2018 Elgin Pelican Mechanical Street Sweeper with options in a total amount not to exceed $199,705 [funds from 2018 Fleet Replacement account and street sweeper grant ($75K) from Regional Air Quality Council] b) Resolution 07-2018 – a resolution granting approval to the Longs Peak Metropolitan District to include additional parcels within its boundaries and to provide service to those parcels [parcels from previous Jeffco animal shelter] c) Resolution 05-2018 – a resolution of the Wheat Ridge City Council expressing support for the Dream Act of 2017 [request from Metro Mayors Caucus] d) Resolution 04-2018 – a resolution approving an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City of Wheat Ridge and the City of Lakewood concerning Forensic Crime Lab and Analyst Services in the amount of $71,200 [annual renewal; 2018 savings for this arrangement = $34,955] e) Resolution 06-2018 – a resolution approving the 2018 Police Recruit Training Agreement to provide Law Enforcement Academy Training for six Wheat Ridge Police Recruits at the Combined Regional Academy [$36K; budgeted] Councilmember Pond introduced the Consent Agenda. Motion by Councilmember Pond to approve the Consent Agenda items a) thru e); seconded by Councilmember Hoppe. Councilmember Mathews asked to pull Items b) and c). Motion to approve Items a), d) and e) carried 8-0. Councilmember Pond read a description of Item b) and moved its approval; seconded by Councilmember Duran. Mr. Mathews asked when staff knew that Clear Creek Crossing was going to be a hospital. Mr. Goff said that was not germane to the Metropolitan District. The ODP will be discussed with a later agenda item. The motion to approve Item b) carried 8-0. Councilmember Pond read an explanation of Item c) and moved its approval; seconded by Councilmember Mathews. Councilmember Mathews voiced that he is opposed to becoming involved in matters of national and international politics. As with the Paris Accords, he doesn’t believe it is appropriate for the City Council to speak for the whole City on such issues. Councilmember Duran said she thinks it’s extremely important for the City to show support for the Dream Act. She would like to see resources on the City website and she thinks it’s important to show unity and that we stand together as a City and a Council. The motion to approve Item c) carried 7-1, with Councilmember Mathews voting no. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 2. Resolution 01-2018– A resolution approving a sixty-three lot Subdivision Plat for property zoned Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-N) at 11818 W. 52nd Avenue (Case No. WS-17-01/Hance Ranch) The applicant is requesting approval of a sixty-three lot subdivision plat for the 3.91 acre parcel for the purpose of building sixty-three townhomes. Councilmember Mathews introduced Resolution 01-2018 Mayor Starker opened the public hearing and swore in the speakers. Staff Presentation ~ Meredith Reckert • Ms. Reckert began with an explanation of what a subdivision does (defines property lines and allows the City to evaluate ROW and civil documents for traffic and drainage) and what it does not do (change zoning or permitted uses, or examine site design or building placement). • She entered into the record the case file and packet material, the zoning ordinance and subdivision regulations, the Comprehensive Plan and the contents of the digital presentation. • The purposed subdivision will create 63 town home lots with eight tracts. • Because more than five lots are proposed City Councilk is the final authority. • The Planning Commission has heard the case and recommends approval. • A neighborhood meeting is not required for a subdivision plat. • The property is bounded by 52nd Avenue (N), Taft Court (W) and Tabor Street (E). • The property of 3.91 acres was previously an alpaca farm. • The property was rezoned in 2016. The northern plot (the subject of this application) was zoned Mixed Use Neighborhood to encourage a medium density mixed use development that would allow both commercial and residential. • The south parcel is now zoned MU-Commercial TOD, but it not under consideration. • With an aerial map, Ms. Reckert described adjacent land uses and highlighted the various infrastructure upgrades that have been done in anticipation of commuter rail coming to the area (realignment of Tabor to the south, a traffic signal at Tabor & Ridge Road, and construction of Taft Court between Ridge Road and 52nd. • Slides of the area were presented and described. • She went through the steps that have already been completed: rezoning from R-1 to MU-N and MU-C TOD in 2016; administrative approval of the Concept Plan in March 2017; and approval of the two-lot subdivision by City Council last June. Following approval of the plat tonight, the next steps will be administrative approval of the Site Development Plan and building permits. • The purpose of this Plat is not to review specific site details, but rather to confirm property boundaries, access, easements, etc. • Each townhome will have a separate parcel. Eight tracts are being dedicated: o Tract A provides access from Taft Ct and 51st Ave, and interior circulation. o Tract B in the middle is for landscaping, including walking paths. o Tracts C and D along 51st Avenue are detention ponds. • Primary access to the development will be from Taft at 51st Ave. There will be no direct access to Tabor Street a condition added by the Planning Commission. • There are east/west pedestrian connections to public streets. • There will be public streets on all sides of the development, except for Taft Ct which was built as an RTD improvement. • All streets will have separated sidewalks, tree lawns and on-street parking. • All agencies can serve the parcels with improvements installed at the developer’s expense. • Public Works has reviewed the drainage plan. Drainage flows southeast to the detention ponds on 51st Ave., which release into a public storm system in Tabor St. • Parks Department is asking for a fee of $127,000. It must be paid before the plat is recorded. • At a public hearing on Dec 7 the Planning Commission made recommendations. • She reviewed the staff recommendations that are listed in the motion. Public Comment Mike Childers (Arvada) was sworn in by the Mayor. He serves on the board of a nearby HOA. He urged the City to seriously review these documents to make sure we are not overpopulating this piece of property. The area already has issues. An auto repair shop was built recently on 52nd Avenue and inadequate parking was provided – forcing cars to be parked on 52nd Avenue. He has concerns about the safety of people pulling out onto to 52nd Avenue. He suggested this design looks to have fairly narrow streets and doesn’t provide parking for anyone other than the owners. He implored the City to take steps to ensure we are not developing something that won’t be attractive – when other more spacious and accommodating developments are available. Council Questions Councilmember Mathews noted that $127K will be paid to the Parks Department, but wondered what green space would be on site. Ms. Reckert testified the minimum requirement for a mixed use development with a single use is 15% total landscaped area, with 75% usable space. That is being done by providing the walking paths. Councilmember Davis shared concerns about traffic on 52nd as expressed by the Planning Commission and asked if the City is doing anything proactively to slow traffic? Mark Westberg testified that 2E dollars for this area have already been prioritized by the City. 52nd is at or near the top of the list. It is a collector street with only two lanes now; the plan for the future is to have three lanes from Tabor to Ward Road. Our side will have detached sidewalks. When pressed about slowing traffic, he noted it’s a short section of street. They are looking at bike lanes or off-street parking or both that may help slow traffic. There is a signal at Ward Road that people will be coming to. They have consulted with partners of Jefferson County and Arvada to see what they are willing to do on the north side. Arvada has been responsive; the County has not. The concern is safety for foot traffic to the school. Councilmember Urban asked about parking requirements. Ms. Reckert testified that each unit will have two parking spaces in garages - which exceeds the minimum requirement of one space. There will also be about 50 additional spaces on the adjacent street frontages of Taft, Tabor, 51st, and 52nd. These four streets will be standard width and should not be affected by the on-street parking. Councilmember Duran inquired about the concern of drainage. Mr. Westberg testified there is a large amount of offsite drainage across 52nd to provide for storm events. The applicant was invited to speak. Noah Nemmers of Baseline Engineering Corporation of Golden was sworn in. His firm represents the applicant. He had nothing to offer and there were no questions for him. Councilmember Mathews asked about the zoning for the individual units. Ms. Reckert said they will be town homes, they are zoned MU-N and each would be occupied by one family. Councilor Mathews expressed concern that these units may not remain as single-family. Mr. Johnstone said the zoning code defines a household unit and a family; it can be a group related by birth or three unrelated individuals and the same rules will apply here. Enforcement is done on a complaint basis. Councilmember Urban asked how Tract B will be maintained. Ms. Reckert said that will be done by the homeowners association. The units will face Tract B. Ms. Reckert confirmed that the property had previously been subdivided into multiple residential lots. Motion by Councilmember Mathews to approve Resolution No. 01-2018, a resolution approving a sixty-three lot Subdivision Plat for property zoned Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-N) at 11818 W. 52nd Avenue (Case No. WS-17-01/Hance Ranch) for the following reasons: 1. City Council has conducted a proper public hearing meeting all public notice requirements as required by Section 26-109 and 26-407 of the Code of Laws. 2. The requested subdivision has been reviewed by the Planning Commission, which has forwarded its recommendation for approval. 3. All requirements of the subdivision regulations have been met. 4. The proposed plat will facilitate redevelopment of the site consistent with the zone change and Concept Plan. 5. Utility districts can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer’s expense. With the following conditions: 1. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) be executed with required security prior to recordation of the subdivision plat. 2. The developer shall pay parks fees at the time of plat recording in the amount of $127,362. 3. The Homeowners’ Association covenants shall be reviewed and approved by Staff prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. There shall be no access from Tract A to Tabor Street. seconded by Councilmember Duran. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. The motion carried 8-0 3. Resolution 02-2018 – A resolution approving a six-lot Subdivision Plat for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) at 2850 and 2880 Teller Street (Case No. WS-17-02/Teller Street) The request is for approval of a six-lot subdivision plat that is in accordance with the R-2 zone district regulations; it will create six new single-family home sites. Councilmember Duran introduced Resolution 02-2018. Councilmember Hoppe announced that she has personal and extensive knowledge of this project. She has discussed this with the City Attorney and they have decided it would be prudent for her to recuse herself. There being no objection to her recusal, Councilmember Hoppe left the Council Chambers at 8:04pm. Staff Presentation ~ Meredith Reckert • Ms. Reckert entered into the record the case file and packet material, the subdivision regulations and the contents of the digital presentation. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing and swore in the speakers. • Ms. Reckert testified that all posting and notification requirements had been met. • She reported that six lots is considered a major subdivision and requires City Council approval. Planning Commission has recommended approval and a neighborhood meeting is not required. • The property currently has 2 parcels and totals 1.4 acres. The northern parcel is vacant; the southern parcel has a single family home that will be demolished. • The intent is to accommodate single family houses. o All the new lots are at least 9,000 sf in size – required for single family. o 12,500 sf is required for a duplex; these lots will not accommodate duplexes. • The property is surrounded by R-2 zoning, but the area is primarily an established single family neighborhood, with a few duplexes and some horse properties • The interior lots will use a single private drive accessed from Teller Street. • An interior hammerhead will accommodate emergency vehicle turnaround; the fire department has approved this design. • Tract A in the SE corner will include some detention improvements. • Teller Street is not wide enough to accommodate the required curb, gutter and 5 ft sidewalk, so the City is requesting a 1½ ft dedication for Teller and Public Works is asking for fees in lieu of construction of public improvements since there are no sidewalks to the north or south of this property. • All agencies can serve the property with improvements installed by the developer. • Public Works has reviewed and approved the drainage report. • The Parks Department will require $12K in lieu of parkland dedication. • She reviewed the Planning Commission recommendations and conditions. • A previous easement providing rear access to the property adjacent to the NW parcel has been extinguished, so no condition is necessary related to that. Berin Jacob Wachsmann (WR), the applicant, introduced himself. He had no comments and there were no questions of him. Council Questions • Councilmember Fitzgerald had a minor questions about the setback related to the house on 29th. It is fine. • Councilmember Mathews asked why this isn’t being rezoned to R-1. Ms. Reckert explained it wasn’t necessary: Single family is allowed in R-2, and these lots are too small to ever build any kind of duplex. Upper stories could not be rented out. • Councilmember Urban asked about marketing individual lots. Mr. Wachsmann said the lots can’t be sold until the platting is approved. They will either sell the subdivision or build it out – whatever makes the most financial sense at the time. • Councilmember Mathews asked about parking accommodations. Ms. Reckert said if there is street parking, two onsite spaces are required. If there is no street parking they need four spaces, which is often a 2-car garage and two pads in the driveway. • Councilmember Duran confirmed there are no issue with emergency vehicles. • Councilmember Duran asked about the value of the homes. Mr. Wachsmann said it would depend on market value. A number of homes in the area have sold recently for $750K; new construction has sold for higher. They envision the end users as families; they didn’t do duplexes because they don’t want to increase density. It’s a low density neighborhood, and they want to keep the country feel. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Duran to approve Resolution No. 02-2018 – A resolution approving a six-lot Subdivision Plat for property zoned Residential-Two (R-2) at 2850 and 2880 Teller Street (Case No. WS-17-02/Teller Street) for the following reasons: 1. City Council has conducted a proper public hearing meeting all public notice requirements as required by Section 26-109 and 26-407 of the Code of Laws. 2. The requested subdivision has been reviewed by the Planning Commission, which has forwarded its recommendation for approval. 3. The proposed lots meet or exceed the R-2 zone district regulations. 4. All requirements of the subdivision regulations have been met. 5. Utility districts can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer’s expense. With the following conditions: 1. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement be executed whereby all private infrastructure improvements are in place prior to issuance of building permits for individual lots. 2. The developer pay parks fees at the time of plat recording in the amount of $12,486.45. 3. The Homeowners’ Association covenants be reviewed and approved by Staff. seconded by Councilmember Davis. Councilmember Urban asked if the other conditions suggested by Planning Commission had been addressed. Ms. Reckert said they had, and are not needed for the motion. The motion carried 7-0. Councilmember Hoppe returned to the Chambers at 8:21pm. 4. Council Bill 20-2017: (Ordinance 1632) – An ordinance approving a Radio Tower Space License Agreement between the City of Wheat Ridge and DMR Networks, Inc. At the November 27 regular meeting, Council approved on first reading Council Bill No. 20-2017, an ordinance approving a radio tower space license agreement for the North Table Mountain site. At that meeting, staff indicated that amendments concerning indemnification and insurance would be drafted for second reading. The public hearing that was originally scheduled for December 11, 2017 was continued until January 8, 2018 to allow the time necessary to craft the required amendments. Councilmember Hoppe introduced Council Bill 20-2017 Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. City Clerk Shaver had previously assigned Ordinance 1632 to this bill. Staff Presentation ~ City Attorney, Jerry Dahl Mr. Dahl went through the indemnification language and pointed out the changes. Insurance language was also addressed. Chief Brennan added that this will provide a good radio system for the City. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Hoppe to approve Council Bill 20-2017 – an ordinance approving a Radio Tower Space License Agreement between the City of Wheat Ridge and DMR Networks, Inc. on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Councilmember Duran; carried 8-0. 5. Resolution 03-2018 – A Resolution approving a Special Use Permit to allow a major automotive repair facility on property zoned Commercial-One (C-1) located at 11072 W. 44th Ave. and 4380 Pierson Street (Case No. Sup-17-04/Subapros) The applicant is requesting approval of a Special Use Permit (SUP) to open a major automotive repair facility – a use that is not a use by right for property zoned C-1 Councilmember Dozeman introduced Resolution 03-2018. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing and swore in the speakers. Staff Presentation ~ Ken Johnstone Mr. Johnstone explained the SUP would have been granted administratively, but a written objection to the SUP was received, which triggered the public hearing. • The entire frontage of the property between Pierson and Parfet faces 44th Avenue. • There are multiple parcels, but have been under one ownership for some time. It has been a commercial pump company since the 1970’s. The property is for sale. • Subapros, a Subaru service business that currently operates in unincorporated Jefferson County, is under contract to purchase the property with the intent to open a major auto repair facility. • Minor auto repair is a use by right in this district; major auto repair is not. • The new Fruitdale Lofts are just to the east and Prospect Park is nearby to the west.. • Surrounding properties are also zoned C-1, which allows for office, general business, retail sales and service. There in some R-2 in the area. The 44th ave corridor has mostly commercial uyses, but areas to the north and south are primarily zoned residential, with some agricultural zones mixed in. • With an aerial photo he explained how the existing buildings will be used. o Some of the uses will be minor auto repair. o No new buildings will be added. o Some parking lot surface and landscaping improvements are planned. o The main shop, with several bay doors, will be close to 44th Avenue. o The body shop will be in the middle – not adjacent to any neighbors. o The minor uses will be located at the rear of the property next to neighbors. o A residential style building in the rear is set up for office space. • Eye-level photos were explained. • He went through the differences in the code for major and minor auto repair. Major auto repair requires a Special Use Permit. • A neighborhood meeting was held; nine neighbors attended; notes are in the packet. • No outside agencies or city departments expressed concerns. • Letters of objections(in the packet) were received and had three primary concerns: 1) Drainage into adjacent properties; 2) Pollution and environmental waste; and 3) Lack of adherence to the City’s Comprehensive Plan and the Fruitdale Subarea Plan (and compatibility with surrounding uses). He explained those issues and how they will be addressed. 1) Since there will be no new construction a review of drainage is not triggered; it is an historical condition we can’t ask them to address. 2) It is presumed that the property will be managed in accordance with applicable environmental laws. The paint booth and handling of oil are things the City can oversee with the building code. Bigger environmental concerns are not regulated at the local level; it’s more state and federal. 3) Regarding the Comprehensive Plan – it is primarily consulted for rezonings – not Special Use Permits; it is an advisory document only, not a regulatory document. • He went through the staff recommendations and the list of conditions that are listed in the motion. Public Comment Elizabeth Smith (WR) is a resident of Fruitdale. She spoke about it as a protected corridor and listed the recommendations of the Fruitdale Subarea Plan. It is to be an agriculture themed area. • Per City Code, SUP’s are discretionary and should have no detrimental effect on the general health, welfare and convenience of those living in the area. Subapros and the City acknowledge this use will cause more noise, traffic, and odor that they name as “negative externalities”, but conclude that because they will be indoor activities, it is not a detriment. o The buildings, large metal sheds that aren’t insulated, will produce noise. o Repair bay door will be open – especially in the summer. o The lube, oil and tire facility will be immediately adjacent to three neighboring homes, with only a fence as a buffer. o Run-off will contain numerous substances that the wholesale pipe/pump supply place did not have. • An SUP requires that the use will not create impacts greater than what is allowed in the existing zoning. The sheer size of this facility dwarfs other auto uses in the area. • Staff and the Planning Commission contend that since there are already automotive uses in the area – one more won’t matter. The neighbors disagree. If this goes in there will be automotive uses on three of four corners; the neighbors feel they are getting surrounded by an automotive ghetto – when they are in Fruitdale, an historic area near a park and the greenbelt. • Code states the use must be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. It’s not compatible with the park, Fruitdale Lofts, Parkside, and individual homes - or with what the Fruitdale area is supposed to be. • She asked why the Comprehensive Plan is so important if we aren’t going to pay attention to it. • She read from page 30 of the Comprehensive Plan a description of the small neighborhood businesses recommended for 44th & Parfet. • She read the City’s goals for the Fruitdale area, and submitted that approval of this use furthers none of those goals. Neither does it advance what people want to see in the area. Julie Rochel (WR) lives behind this property. She said all the questions from the neighborhood meeting were addressed, except for her concern that the entire parking lot of this business drains onto her property. This is detrimental to the animals she has on her land. To now have a variety of automotive fluids draining onto her property is not fair to her. She is opposed to this. Tom Parchman (WR) told Council the neighbors are thrilled about the Fruitdale Subarea Plan and he hopes the Council, as representatives of the people, will look at these important policies established in the Plan. Although this property is zoned Commercial, the surrounding neighborhood is residential – not industrial, not commercial. Council’s approval of this use is discretionary, and he encouraged Council to build Fruitdale into the enclave the important policies said it should be. Mayor Starker swore in additional speakers. Bryce Purchase (WR) lives next to where the offices will be. While he is a proud Subaru driver, he is concerned about the body shop. There is already a body shop directly across the street – which will mean double the odor. He asked that the property line labeled 106 feet be reviewed because it is wrong. It come onto his property much further than indicated. He believes the new owners will improve the property, but he is concerned about more odor and property lines. Peter Kula (Denver), the applicant, addressed the neighbors’ concerns. o He doesn’t think his business will cause the impact that is being expressed. o Their business is currently at 49th & ward Road and is zoned C-3. They want to move from unincorporated Jeffco into Wheat Ridge. o They want to improve the property with landscaping, fencing, paving and painting. o The steel buildings will be insulated for sound deadening. o Most of their business will be on 44th Avenue resulting in minimal impact to the side and rear neighbors. Interior parking with continued fencing will protect the neighbors. o Aesthetically, the improvements will improve the appearance of the area. o Regarding anticipated odors and noise, he noted that the Jefferson County Health Dept has very strict standards for noise levels; those have been researched and they will be compliant. Air standards and EPA requirements will also guide their paint operation. The paint booth will be a minimal part of their business. o They are a god neighbor where they are, and they want to be a good neighbor here. o They want to stay in Wheat Ridge. Most of their employees live in Wheat Ridge, and theirs is a family owned and operated business. Melissa Lawrence (WR) moved here 2 ½ years ago. She shared that they have a close, loving neighborhood; they support each other. Her concerns are environmental, and the noise and light pollution that will affect their homes and the park where children play. She read a prepared statement listing negative effects of this land use: added particles of dirt, rubber, metal, oil, grease, transmission fluid and increased exhaust particles in the air; these substances flowing into our storm sewers; negative impact to the nearby park, waterway and classified wetlands which house protected migratory birds and other wildlife; noise, light and environmental pollution; the burning of waste oil by Subapro is not a clean process and will impact the neighbors; the chemicals in an auto body shop are various; neurological pollutants are found in some auto body paint. Mayor Starker declared a break at 9:07pm. The meeting resumed at 9:14pm. Council questions Councilmember Pond asked if approving this SUP would allow the same use with different buildings. Mr. Johnstone said it would be on a case by case basis because conditions for an SUP’s are fairly site-specific. This could be handled administratively, but specific language could be added at this time to prevent that. Councilmember Davis appreciates getting the property upgraded, but also appreciates the neighbors’ concerns about pollutants. • Mr. Kula explained how sand pits are used to filter automotive drainage, but they have no plans for that at this time. They have a sand pit where they are now, and it doesn’t get used. • Fluids in the main shop will be handled with pigmat or floor-dry. • Subaru’s generally don’t leak on the ground. • The parking along 44th Ave will be the holding/staging area. • He explained where activities will occur, noting how fluids won’t be near the neighbors. Auto parts and auto body parts do not leak. • Construction of a sand pit for the entire facility would be cost prohibitive, and really not necessary. He noted the oversite by the Fire Department, Jeffco Health and Safety, and lots of rules that have to be followed. Mitigation is chosen by what’s feasible, what’s economical and what is absolutely required. Councilmember Duran asked about land uses next to their existing location. • Mr Kula said west of them is a landscaping contractor; south includes insurance, medical and dental ofices; south of that is Kaiser; the north side is train tracks; the east side is Ward Road. There is residential across the train tracks. • Waste oil will be collected and burned in the winter in a waste oil burner. Those burners have been EPA approved since 1980; it’s a very strict process. There is no odor. • Recycling would involve a large truck coming in to remove the oil and driving it to another location(s). They chose to burn the waste oil on site and use it to heat the property. It saves energy and never leaves the property, thereby reducing the risk of spillage. • How will the property to the south be protected? Mr. Johnstone said it’s very flat – they haven’t looked at what to do so he doesn’t know if there are options. City stormwater regulations and the state stormwater discharge permit are not triggered in this case because they are not touching the site improvements. He said if Council thinks this new use is a concern the staff can explore potential conditions for that. He cautioned he is unsure of options, and doesn’t want to overpromise at this point. Councilmember Hoppe received confirmation that the applicant doesn’t currently own this property, and that long term storage of cars for restoration will probably be in the northern section of the parking lot on the east side of the main building behind the 6-foot fence. Councilmember Urban asked if installation and use of the waste oil burner is a use by right in C-1, or is enabled by the SUP. Mr. Johnstone testified it would be an allowed use in the zone as long as it is compliant with the building code. Additionally, • Mr. Kula informed that the “major auto repair” designation was needed to allow them to rebuild engines, replace transmissions, and have the paint operation. • Regarding what chemicals would escape this property as a major repair vs minor repair, Mr. Kula explained that the paint booth is a significant trigger for that, however there are strict regulations and the chemicals are very different (more water soluble and less toxic) than even five years ago. Paint booths have a multi-layer filtration systems that is required and regulated by the Fire Dept, the Health Dept and the EPA. He also noted that the business to the north, “Reflections”, is a full-time auto body and paint facility that does it every day, whereas their painting would be intermittent and less frequent. Councilmember Mathews asked about hazmat inspections. Mr. Kula explained that the Fire Dept is the most frequent and main (initial) inspector. They ensure there is an adequate number of fire extinguishers and that there is correct isolation of chemicals in appropriate cabinetry. Unresolved problems would be reported to the Health Dept, the EPA or OSHA. Mr. Mathews asked what would trigger an inspection by the EPA. Mr. Kula said he wasn’t sure – maybe a large spill, but they’ve never had that experience. Councilmember Dozeman asked about acquisition and opening. Mr. Kula said acquisition is scheduled for Wednesday and their opening is scheduled for March 1. The power is good, but dated. A number of electrical and other upgrades are needed, along with the installation of insulation. ~ Mr. Johnstone informed her that other automotive businesses in the area are a mix of uses by right and Special Use Permits. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Dozeman to approve resolution 03-2018 – a resolution approving a Special Use Permit to allow a major automotive repair facility on property zoned Commercial-One (C-1) located at 11072 W. 44th Ave. and 4380 Pierson Street for the following reasons: 1. City Council has conducted a proper public hearing that meets all public notice requirements as required by Section 26-109 of the Code of Laws. 2. The proposed Special Use Permit has been reviewed by the Community Development Department, which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The proposed Special Use Permit has been found to comply with the “criteria for review” in Section 26-114-D of the Code of Laws. With the following conditions: 1. Landscaping improvements along the W. 44th Avenue frontage and at the corner with Pierson Street will be required before a certificate of occupancy may be issued, including: a. A four-foot fence along the north property line to screen the parking area, b. Irrigation and plant material in the existing ±800-square foot bed at the northwest corner, and c. Maintenance of the existing ±800-square foot bed at the northeast corner and along the east property line. 2. Pursuant to Section 26-502.E.12.j of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, no parking area shall be used for the sale, storage, repair of, dismantling or servicing of any vehicles, equipment materials or supplies; vehicles stored in excess of seventy-two (72) hours for the purpose of being repaired must be screened from view from adjacent streets and properties by a six-foot-high solid fence. 3. The Special Use Permit shall be granted to the applicant, SubaPros, and shall not be transferred or assigned. seconded by Councilmember Mathews. Councilmember Fitzgerald announced he would be voting no because this is not compatible with the recommendations of the Fruitdale Subarea Plan, and it doesn’t comply with the 2005 NRS recommendations. We have too many automotive businesses. They do not add class to our city and make it hard for us to attract higher class businesses. Councilmember Hoppe will vote no because this is not compatible with the guiding and visionary documents for the area. The City has invested quite a bit into this corridor. Councilmember Duran will vote no because she is looking at the bigger picture for that area and listening to the citizens. Councilmember Mathews always struggles with property rights vs neighborhood rights, but finds the distinction between major and minor auto repair to be somewhat arbitrary. He noted a business across the street has this exact same use. He will support this. Councilmember Urban believes that the distinction between major and minor use is also about the amount of investment by the owner. A minor auto repair business would be a use by right, while this applicant has committed to investing a major amount of money and effort into making this a secure and environmentally friendly site. He thinks this applicant will be a better neighbor than what could possibly come as a use by right. Councilmember Pond believes the vision for Fruitdale is a journey. It’s also important to him that this property is zoned C-1 and has a long list of allowed uses by right; he doesn’t care what adjacent neighbors are zoned. He believes the fact that this applicant is using existing buildings makes this special use a transitional use in the journey of the Fruitdale area. He will not support this unless there is stronger wording that guarantees continued use of the existing buildings. Councilmember Dozeman expressed mixed feelings on this. She supports private property rights, but the NRS designates this area as an Orchard District and this use doesn’t fit that. She believes the applicant will be a great neighbor and has addressed the neighbors’ concerns. She sees the distinction between major and minor auto repair as small. She will support this. Councilmember Pond suggested the addition of a further condition that would prevent new development on this property under this Special Use Permit. Discussion followed. Mr. Dahl offered potential wording. Motion by Councilmember Pond to amend the main motion with an additional Condition #4 stating that no new buildings may be constructed on this site, but building renovation of existing structures will be permitted; seconded by Councilmember Mathews. There was brief discussion clarifying that façade replacement and new signage would be allowed under this amendment. The motion to amend carried 7-1, with Councilmember Fitzgerald voting no. The main motion carried 5-3, with Councilmembers Fitzgerald, Hoppe and Duran voting no. ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING 6. Council Bill 01-2018 – An Ordinance approving the rezoning of property located on the west side of interstate-70, between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) (Case No. WZ-16-07/Clear Creek Crossing) Evergreen Devco, Inc. purchased 109 acres of undeveloped property on the west side of I-70 and south of Clear Creek in December 2016 with the articulated intent of building a development of mixed-use commercial, entertainment, residential and a major employer. Evergreen has applied for a rezoning of this property from the current Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to a Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) designation. The PCD focused on retail uses. The desire for a PMUD is to allow a development with a much broader mix of residential, employment, retail, hotel, restaurant and entertainment uses, including a hospital campus. The applicant is also requesting approval of an Outline Development Plan (ODP), supported by a Vision Book that establishes the intended design and architectural themes and materials, as well as a Design Pattern Book that includes the more substantive development regulations. Councilmember Fitzgerald introduced Council Bill 01-2018. Motion by Councilmember Fitzgerald to approve Council Bill 01-2018 an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located on the west side of interstate-70, between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) (Case No. WZ-16-07/Clear Creek Crossing) on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, February 12, 2018 at 7 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by Councilmember Pond; Councilmember Urban stated that prior to this meeting he spoke briefly with representatives of Lutheran Medical Center about the moratorium on free standing emergency rooms. As a natural outflow of that conversation the topic of this case about Clear Creek Crossing developed. He informed them of the quasi-judicial nature of this case and that he can only consider material presented at the public hearing. He thought it proper and important to disclose this brief conversation, but does not think it will impact or weigh on his decision making abilities regarding this case. Councilmember Mathews noted this is a major surprise -- a major change from retail to direct competition with our existing hospital, Lutheran, that has been a major component of our community for at least 100 years. He thinks more study is necessary on the impacts of how this would affect our community. He would like it tabled. Councilmember Hoppe noted that Council was always told there would be a large employment area in the development, followed by quick service, entertainment and residential/hotel. This is not a surprise – we just didn’t know who the mayor employer was because the developer was under contract to not tell the Council who it was. She doesn’t appreciate the assumption that Council is being hoodwinked by our staff. Councilmember Duran doesn’t think fingers are being pointed to anyone on staff. Since it has been revealed that it will be a hospital she thinks more discussion is necessary and she would like it on a study session so questions and concerns can be addressed. Councilmember Pond appreciates the questions, but doesn’t think it’s proper to discuss this outside a public hearing. He thinks questions can be answered with that process. Councilmember Urban asked why this didn’t go to the Planning Commission first. Mr. Goff stated that Mr. Johnstone typically prefers to go to Planning Commission first, but because of the nature of the project and its size and the proposed use, staff thought it best to get it before City Council first so they would be aware of this use. Councilmember Mathews stated he resents the implication that he was trying to use the term “hoodwinked”. He asked if a hospital was in the initial use. Mr. Goff said he fully understands the concern and consulted Mr. Dahl about the possibility of a study session first. Because an application was submitted on December 14, 2016 it became quasi- judicial. At that time a hospital was not planned, but this project has evolved for years. At the time of the application Evergreen asked if the City could be as flexible as possible about the uses. The City worked through that – noting that until June of 2017 Walmart was a potential tenant. Following that the City worked with Evergreen on the Vision Book, the Design Book and other allowed uses for the zoning. Not until recently did the City find out that the employment use was a hospital and that the developer had been under a confidentiality agreement. In the past, when it was a Cabella’s project, the City met with Councilmember two at a time to inform them of dates that weren’t ready for the public. Now, since this is quasi-judicial, that is not available – nor is a study session or an executive session. He wanted to get the information to the Council as soon as possible, so the public hearing process was chosen as the next step. Councilmember Davis agreed with Councilmember Pond about proceeding with 1st reading, but thinks there is a lot of discussion that needs to happen. Councilmember Dozeman supports proceeding with the hearing process, but thinks rezoning it as a hospital is a very different conversation than what has been happening with the public. We went to the public and asked for funding for hook ramps under the guise of retail and housing. She suggested that had the public known this project was going to be a major hospital site that could cannibalize from a long standing, high- quality member of our community, she doesn’t think the funding would have been approved. She’s interested in what this conversation will produce. Councilmember Mathews stated he supports having this move forward, but wanted to make sure the public is aware of the nuance of what is happening – that Council was not aware a hospital was going to be proposed, and that there be timely and thorough discussion and full disclosure to the citizens. A sign for a rezoning hearing on that property would be seen by no one and he’d support anything the City can do to publicize this issue. Councilmember Duran said her vote to support 1st reading is only a vote to have the conversation and to foster transparency. Mr. Dahl reminded Council that approving 1st Reading is only granting the due process that the applicant is entitled to and has no bearing on how a councilmember may vote at the public hearing. He advised that at 2nd reading the public hearing could be continued for additional hearings. He thanked Council for reserving their thoughts about the ultimate project. Councilmember Urban asked what Council’s capacity at the hearing, or prior to the hearing, will be to ask for additional information. Mr. Dahl said that would be appropriate if it is apart from the motion for 1st Reading. The motion carried 7-1, with Councilmember Urban voting no. 7. Council Bill 02-2018 - An Ordinance extending the Temporary Moratorium of the submission, acceptance, processing, and approval of applications and requests for a permit, license land use approval or other approval for a Freestanding Emergency Room Facility In April of 2017 the Council adopted a one-year moratorium on the submission, acceptance, processing and approval of applications and requests related to freestanding emergency room facilities. This ordinance extends the moratorium period for an additional 120 days, to and including August 27, 2018. Councilmember Davis introduced Council Bill 02-2018. Motion by Councilmember Davis to approve Council Bill 02-2018 - an ordinance extending the Temporary Moratorium of the submission, acceptance, processing, and approval of applications and requests for a permit, license land use approval or other approval for a Freestanding Emergency Room Facility on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, January 22, 2018 at 7 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by Councilmember Duran; carried 8-0. 8. Council Bill 03-2018 – An ordinance amending Chapter 7 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws regarding Elections to ensure consistency and compatibility with the Colorado Municipal Election Laws This ordinance would delete those sections of the Code which are adequately covered and governed by state law in C.R.S. 31-10-101 et seq., also known as the "Colorado Municipal Election Code,” as well as related portions of Title 1, C. R. S. This ensures consistency and compatibility with state law, and also removes the need to amend the City Code every time there is a change in these sections of the state law. Councilmember Urban introduced Council Bill 03-2018. Motion by Councilmember Urban to approve Council Bill 03-2018 – an ordinance amending Chapter 7 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws regarding Elections to ensure consistency and compatibility with the Colorado Municipal Election Laws, on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, January 22, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and that it take effect upon adoption and signature of the Mayor and City Clerk, seconded by Councilmember Mathews; carried 8-0. CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS Treasurer DiTullio noted that ballot issue 2E set a maximum of $3.7M in revenue the City could collect in the first year of 2E. Due to the extra revenue that was taken in because of the hail storm, the 2017 revenue looks to be about $300K over that amount. Council will have to ask the voters what to do with that money. A study session to discuss options is suggested. ~ He reported meeting with representatives of the Department of Local Affairs about their program Colorado Resiliency Framework dealing with way for cities to be sustainable with their budgets. Because Wheat Ridge uses priority based budgeting they would like to use Wheat Ridge as a case study. Clerk Shaver announced that this year’s application process for boards and commissions has begun. It would be helpful if board members who want to reapply and any new applicants could send their applications in as soon as possible. The deadline is January 31. Applications are available on the City website, and information is also available on Channel 8. Janeece Hoppe reported hearing from a couple citizens who support the tree replacement program. She suggested Council consider this as a free service to citizens to be paid for with extra funds – should the voters approve spending it. Zachary Urban Motion by Councilmember Urban to direct the City Treasurer to provide an economic analysis of the sales and use tax for the area from 32nd to 42nd, from Allison to Dudley; seconded by Councilmember Duran. There was a question about the purpose of this information. Councilmember Urban stated it would provide information about a concentrated existing medical facility that could be compared and contrasted with a new medical facility. Treasurer DiTullio said he would compile three years of data surrounding Lutheran Hospital, adjacent medical facilities and other sales tax generating businesses in that area. Discussion followed. When the discussion crept into the merits of a scheduled rezoning case Mr. Dahl recommended termination of the conversation. The motion carried 6-2, with Councilmembers Fitzgerald and Davis voting no. Mayor Starker thanked citizens for coming to speak on the various issues, congratulated the WRHS Poms for taking state two years in a row, and announced the passing of lifelong Wheat Ridge resident and former City Council member Kent Davis. The City Council Meeting adjourned at 10:50 pm. ADJOURN to Special Study Session _____________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 12, 2018 Tim Fitzgerald, Mayor Pro tem The preceding Minutes were prepared according to §47 of Robert’s Rules of Order, i.e. they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD’s of the meetings are available for listening or viewing in the City Clerk’s Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING January 22, 2018 Mayor Starker called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Boy Scout Troop 329 performed the flag ceremony, posted the colors and recited the pledge. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Zachary Urban Janeece Hoppe George Pond Kristi Davis Tim Fitzgerald Larry Mathews Leah Dozeman Absent: Monica Duran (excused) Also present: City Clerk, Janelle Shaver; City Treasurer, Jerry DiTullio; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; City Manager, Patrick Goff; Administrative Services Director, Heather Geyer; Community Development Director, Ken Johnstone; Public Works Director, Scott Brink; Parks & Recreation Director, Joyce Manwaring; other staff, guests and interested citizens. PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES none CITIZENS RIGHT TO SPEAK Dorothy Archer (WR) distributed a packet of information to the Council containing the ordinance Edgewater passed limiting residential heights to 25 feet. She spoke of Arvada’s plans to address this same issue. An Arvada planner, whose contact information she also gave them, told her Arvada realizes that 35 feet is no longer an acceptable height, and he would be glad to speak with anyone. A lady in the Lakewood Planning department told her that Lakewood is not experiencing scraping, but they do have very strict standards that must be followed. ~ She spoke about the new houses at 32nd & Teller. The owner told her the sf house is not quite 30 feet high (with a sloped roof), and the duplex is 27 feet high. Additionally, the garage was kept at one-story out of consideration for the neighbors to the east. ~ She invited Council to drive by a new house that is being built using the 35 ft height/15ft bulk plane rules. Council should see how uncomplimentary it is to the neighbors. ~ She will continue to come every week if necessary until Council addresses this 35 ft/15 ft bulk plane issue in east Wheat Ridge. Bob Brazell (WR) addressed the issue of ADU’s. He thinks if people want to add a second house on their property they should buy a duplex. He believes it isn’t fair to the existing neighbors, who bought property in a neighborhood with a specific zoning, to allow people to come in and actually change the zoning to allow for additional rental City Council Minutes January 22, 2018 units on a single lot. Zoning is zoning. He thinks this is a selfish desire that will deflate property values and crowd the streets with added cars and traffic. He doesn’t think we need more people in Wheat Ridge – reminding Council that our property values have remained high because we don’t have this kind of nonsense. Michael Illo (WR) distributed a packet of material to the Council which contained examples of how he thought a public representative used his elected office to represent his personal opinions with numerous derogatory statements and incitements. He understands that everyone has a right to free speech, but he thinks it is a conflict of interest for elected officials to use their publicly funded office to express personal views, say negative things about people in the city and influence people. He hopes there can be a protocol for how elected representatives conduct themselves. This is the only example he has seen of an elected official trying to go behind the scenes and instigate arguments. He thinks this is deceitful and makes the whole city government structure look suspect. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA 1. CONSENT AGENDA a) Motion to approve the purchase of 2018 vehicle replacements and the purchase and installation of lighting, auxiliary and communications equipment in a total amount not to exceed $351,897 [4 Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicles @ $33,425; 2 Ford Fusion hybrid sedans @ $22,430; 1 mid-size 4x2 Chevrolet Colorado ext cab pickup ($22,376); 1 mid-size 4x2 Chevrolet Colorado ext cab pickup ($27,507; 1 Ford F-350 Cab & Chassis w/ dump body ($40,454) = $268,897; lighting, markings and communication equip = $83,000] b) Motion to appoint Jerry DiTullio as a City Director to the Wheat Ridge Business District Board of Directors, term to expire March 31, 2021 c) Resolution 09-2018 – amending the Fiscal year 2018 General Fund Budget in the amount of $6,698 for the purpose of appropriating Grant Awards for the purchase and installation of a Bike and Pedestrian Counter on the Clear Creek Trail and for a Pergola and Fruit Trees at Happiness Gardens [unbudgeted; two unanticipated grants from JeffCo Public Health; portable bike/ped counter = $4,048; pergola (shade for gardeners) and fruit trees (to provide healthy foods) = $2,650] d) Motion to approve payment to Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) for 2018 Workers’ Compensation Premium in the amount of $304,536 and 2018 Property/Casualty Premium in the amount of $231,139 [workers’ comp premium down $53,560 from last year; property/casualty premium up $35,497 from last year] City Council Minutes January 22, 2018 e) Motion to approve 2018 Payment to Renewal Wheat Ridge in the amount of $300,000 [budgeted; yearly contribution for RWR operating expenses] Councilmember Hoppe introduced the Consent Agenda. Motion by Councilmember Hoppe to approve the Consent Agenda items a), b) c), d), and e); seconded by Councilmember Urban; carried 7-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 2. Council Bill 02-2018– An Ordinance extending the Temporary Moratorium of the submission, acceptance, processing, and approval of applications and requests for a permit, license land use approval or other approval for a Freestanding Emergency Room Facility The one-year moratorium on applications and requests related to freestanding emergency rooms expires in April. This ordinance extends the moratorium period for an additional 120 days, to and including August 27, 2018. Councilmember Davis introduced Council Bill 02-2018. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. Staff presentation Mr. Dahl explained the extension. There is some expectation that the legislature will act on this matter during this year’s session. He advised that the extension is appropriate. There was no public comment on the ordinance. Motion by Councilmember Davis to approve Council Bill 02-2018 an ordinance extending the Temporary Moratorium of the submission, acceptance, processing, and approval of applications and requests for a permit, license, land use approval or other approval for a freestanding emergency room facility, on second reading, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Councilmember Fitzgerald. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Clerk Shaver assigned Ordinance 1634. The motion carried 7-0. 3. Council Bill 03-2018 – An Ordinance amending Chapter 7 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws regarding Elections to ensure consistency and compatibility with the Colorado Municipal Election Laws City Council Minutes January 22, 2018 This ordinance will delete certain sections of the City’s Election Code which are adequately covered and governed by state law. Councilmember Urban introduced Council Bill 03-2018. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. Clerk Shaver assigned Ordinance 1635. Staff presentation Jerry Dahl explained that this section of our Code grows smaller as state law becomes more specific. Many municipalities defer to state laws on this subject. The City does hold its elections in November and all elections are now coordinated elections with the County. Since the City already subscribes to state municipal election laws, it makes sense to remove sections of our code that are covered by state law so that changes aren’t necessary every time state law changes. The sections being deleted deal with reporting requirements, filings, violations, penalties and automatic recounts – all of which are governed by state statues. Sections that are specific to Wheat Ridge will not be removed. Clerk Shaver explained how the change will affect reporting requirements for candidates. Current Wheat Ridge Code requires candidates and committees to file two campaign finance reports -- 11 days before the election and 30 days after the election. Following adoption of this ordinance we will follow the state requirement of three reports – 21 days before the election, the Friday before the election and 30 days after the election. She added that most cities she knows of, certainly in Jefferson County, all require the three reports; Wheat Ridge has had a unique set of reporting rules. She pointed out that with mail-in ballots this reporting schedule will benefit the voters by providing them with financial information from the candidates and committees earlier in the process. Councilmember Urban asked if the Election Commission would be affected. No. Motion by Councilmember Urban to approve Council Bill 03-2018, an ordinance amending Chapter 7 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws regarding elections to ensure consistency and compatibility with the Colorado Municipal Election Laws, on second reading to take effect immediately upon passage as provided by Section 5.13 of the Charter; seconded by Councilmember Hoppe; carried 7-0. DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS 4. Motion to award contract to Design Concepts, Inc. in a not to exceed amount of $175,695 for the purpose of preparing the design and construction documents for Prospect Park Renovation Phase II City Council Minutes January 22, 2018 This contract includes design development, preparation of construction documents, building, and bid analysis services. It includes services from the vendors DHM Design, JVA Engineering and Ackerman Engineering. This phase of the renovation includes the addition of lighted pickle ball courts, improved park entrance drive, improved access to the north side of Prospect Lake and the addition of a fishing dock and small shelter, a new picnic pavilion, resurfaced trail, relocation of the playground, and changes to the driveway into the south parking lot. Councilmember Mathews introduced Item 4. Staff presentation Joyce Manwaring reported this phase includes the construction of pickle ball courts on the northwest side of the park, improvements to the lake edge, replacement of the pavilion on the south side of the park, and a new trail and new entry into that area. Depending on grant funding and the market at bidding, it is hoped all of Phase ll can be completed. Council questions Councilmember Urban had a question about the letter addressing engineering services for map revisions. If we aren’t intending to use those services because we don’t want to impact he flood plain, why are we setting aside $20K for that? Ms. Manwaring reported that it is specifically worded as “not to exceed”. While the intent is not to impact the flood plain, in the event the design requires even a small change funding will be there for that permit so the project can continue. Hope those funds won’t be need. Councilmember Urban hopes that any impact to the flood plain doesn’t cause any downstream problems for residential neighbors east and south of the park. Motion by Councilmember Mathews to award contract to Design Concepts, Inc. in a not to exceed amount of $175,695 for the purpose of preparing the design and construction documents for Prospect Park Renovation Phase II; seconded by Councilmember Dozeman; carried 7-0. 5. Resolution 08-2018 – A Resolution accepting a water color painting by Artist Charlotte Talbert. The Cultural Commission has received a request to accept the donation of a painting by longtime resident Charlotte Talbert. Council approval is required. Councilmember Dozeman introduced Item 5. Staff presentation Ms. Manwaring and citizen Moe Keller displayed the painting that has been donated to the City. City Council Minutes January 22, 2018 Citizen comment Moe Keller (WR) reported that her neighbor of 40 year, Charlotte Talbert, passed away last May at the age of 93. Charlotte founded the Wheat Ridge Art League in 1974 and was president of it many times. She was on the Carnation Festival board for some 20 years and set up the Art League displays for the festival. Her neighbors thought it fitting to honor her by purchasing one of her paintings and donating it to the City. Perhaps it could hang in City Hall or in the Active Adult Center where the Art League still meets. The neighbors are willing to create a plaque to accompany the painting and will be gathering some history on Charlotte. Motion by Councilmember Dozeman to approve Resolution No. 08-2018, a resolution accepting a water color painting by artist Charlotte Talbert, seconded by Councilmember Mathews; carried 7-0. CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS Mr. Goff gave an update on the Ridge Home property as a follow-up to the email he sent to Council several months ago. Jefferson County Human Services is looking at acquiring the property that is located in Wheat Ridge. It is currently owned by the state and is zoned A-1. Structures on the north are vacant. The buildings still under operation continue to house developmentally disabled offenders that don’t fit in the corrections system. Legislation is being drafted on the transfer. Nothing is final. Jeffco plans to use this property for their Jeffco Prosperity Project to help families break the cycle of generational poverty. Since this is in Wheat Ridge he wanted to give Council a heads up. There are no plans or financing in place. Institutional buildings would be razed and the site cleaned up. City may be asked for funding or to be a partner is this effort. He recommended joining the Arvada City Council in a meeting with the County about this. Councilmember Mathews asked if the buildings would fall under our City’s codes. Yes. The County has been told it would have to go through the standard rezoning process. Councilmember Urban inquired why it is zoned A-1. Mr. Johnstone had no information on that; it is old zoning from prior to incorporation. Councilmember Urban understands that the Jeffco Housing Authority is also interested in this property. Mr. Goff noted the final ownership is undecided, but the Housing Authority is one of the partners. Clerk Shaver noted that when she was a child and Ridge Home was in operation it had barns and cows -- likely a dairy operation and other farm uses for the Home. CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS none ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS Treasurer DiTullio reported that on January 17th Localworks had a Pints and Policy discussion. 25 citizens were there, including him, Scott Brink from Public Works and City Council Minutes January 22, 2018 Guy Nahmiach from the Parks Commission, to talk about the 2E projects. He read information from a flyer he distributed at that meeting and reported on the CSAFE account. Janeece Hoppe announced that she and Councilmember Dozeman would like to have the topic of a tree removal, trim and replacement grant program be added to a future study session – preferably in the early spring for seasonal reasons. Kristi Davis asked to add a mulching program to that discussion. Zach Urban thanked the Boy Scouts of Troop 329 for attending the meeting. He jokingly apologized there were no contentious issues this evening – as he knows one of the elements of the Communications merit badge is to develop two sides to one issue. Tim Fitzgerald, in response to Mr. Brazell’s comment, reported that the city manager is actively involved in discussing the renewal projects. Council will be discussing it at a later date, and probably as a result will also discuss ADUs. It is coming; things don’t happen instantly. ~ He announced that Mr. Pond and he will be having a citizen listening session on March 10 at 9:30 at Morningstar (38th & Kipling), in the meeting room upstairs. Mayor Starker thanked Troop 329 for helping is with the flag ceremony and for coming in to find out about how city government works. ~ He thanked the Parks Department and staff for acquiring the beautiful painting by Charlotte Talbert. ADJOURNMENT to Special Study Session The City Council Meeting adjourned at 7:54 pm. _____________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 12, 2018 Tim Fitzgerald, Mayor Pro tem The preceding Minutes were prepared according to §47 of Robert’s Rules of Order, i.e. they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD’s of the meetings are available for listening or viewing in the City Clerk’s Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions. City Council Minutes January 22, 2018 STUDY SESSION NOTES CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO City Council Chambers 7500 W. 29th Avenue December 18 2017 Mayor Starker called the Study Session to order at 6:30 p.m. Council members present: Monica Duran, Janeece Hoppe, Zachary Urban, George Pond, Kristi Davis, Tim Fitzgerald, Larry Mathews, Leah Dozeman Also present: City Clerk, Janelle Shaver; City Manager, Patrick Goff; Community Development Director, Ken Johnstone; other staff, guests and interested citizens CITIZEN COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS Bob Brazell (WR) talked about how neighbors should look after one another to obtain safety and happiness as a community; there must be give and take by everyone. Unfortunately some of the people moving in just want to take – take their neighbor’s view so they can have one, and take their privacy, sunshine, and quality of life so they can have what they want. That’s not neighborly; that’s selfish. Let them go elsewhere. Our neighbors in Edgewater mirror our R1-C area in lot size and they have responsibly instituted a 28ft height limit on pitched roofs and 25 ft for flat roofs. The only things that can exceed are chimneys and vent pipes to ensure the privacy of others. He hopes the Council will show the same compassion and concern for its residents as the Edgewater Council has for theirs. John Fielding (WR) thanked Mr. Goff, Mr. Tardiff and Monica Duran for helping with his roof. ~ He believes we all agree we like the small town feel – parks, open space, view of the mountains, sense of community and respect -- that’s why we live here. If Council lets people build 35 foot towers we all lose. 25 feet is more than enough. It will start a rush of people behaving badly, building bad houses and popping the tops of existing houses, diminishing the rich historic value of older homes, blocking the breeze, sunlight and views from their neighbors and saying to heck with everyone else. Is this the legacy of disregard and disrespect we want to leave? It will bring more people, noise and traffic and less tranquility, respect and willingness for everyone to get along. We are not Denver. This is Wheat Ridge and that’s why we live here. He urged support for 25 feet. Dorothy Archer (WR) said she is 100% behind the last two people who spoke. She supports R1-C and R-3, believes Council should carry this to R-1 and R-2. She asked Council to please keep us who we are. We don’t need 35 feet houses. Our houses sell immediately and people come here because they love it. We should keep it that way. Victoria Mendoza (WR) lives in SE corner of Wheat Ridge where most houses are R- 1C. It is a small corner of the city that makes up 11% of the city. She asked Council to set a height limit of 25ft. for new houses in this area – like Edgewater has. She asked them to keep the integrity of the neighborhood and recognize that a height of 35 ft is excessive. She would like it reduced to 25 ft and 28 ft. She feels this needs to be STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -2- decided soon because more of this will permanently change the look and feel of this area and the character people love so much. Jesse Hill (WR) has spent a lot of time on bulk plane with the City. He feels the pain of the current 15 ft bulk plane; it’s been very difficult to work with on design and he wishes that would be revisited and changed to 17 ft or adjust the base plane. ~ He noted the great diagrams from the staff that show the restrictions of the current 15 ft bulk plane. He mentioned that reality may also include sloped lots and smaller lots, and it forces designs to conform to new houses that are already going to be there. You lose certain architectural styles such as the cross gable group; dormers can be difficult to work in. He stated it is tough to get a variance because the general hardship is seen as self-imposed and the variance process is not easy. In looking at the images, he believes adding any more limitations will force taller, blockier, flat roofed structures. If someone wants a back yard it will be tough to do. Also, when porches are included for lot coverage that forces the structure higher. ~ He believes there are a lot of opinions out there -- a lot of fear about people and trash taking over the neighborhood. It’s unfortunate some of the comments are so negative. He noted the house built next to him sold for $380/sf —more than any other property out there. This isn’t a property value thing; it’s the neighbors not wanting to buy the piece of property next to them to control it. There are other options out there. He hopes this can be resolved soon. Benny Gonzales (WR) spoke to 25 ft height limit in R-1C only. He and his wife moved here from Thornton in 2012 because they like the small town atmosphere, the character of each house being a little different. They didn’t like what was happening in Denver with building heights, so they chose Wheat Ridge. Since moving here his nice view of the mountains has been taken away and it seems like the builder just took advantage of the 35 ft allowance and built to the maximum. He wants things to be equal and fair – including fair for the small houses. He believes two stories fits the neighborhood. People can build the design they want, any way they want, build with better materials to increase the value, make it as valuable as they want, and the 15 foot bulk plane gives enough space. He would like to see the 35 ft limit decreased to 25 ft. He asked Council to consider that the over 100 people who signed the petition last year in favor of the bulk plane also wanted a 25 ft height limit. Many are not here tonight, but he’s recently spoken to 10 people just on his block that favor the 25 ft limit. Marina Sarmiento (WR) said she agrees with what the previous speakers have said; she favors keeping the 25 ft bulk plane in R-1C. She thinks if people want to build something new, they should consider that the neighbors have small homes and they’re taking away our views. It feels invading and unfair. Alvaro Lazalde (WR) yielded his time to Michael Epson. Michael Epson (WR) is a 28-year resident in R-1C. He passed out some graphics to the Council and explained the various diagrams and pictures. He made a special note of one picture of a house up the street from him. The lady who lived there had spent 10 years cultivating a very private garden. As the picture shows, the deck at the back of the house that was built next to her looks directly over her garden. This upset her so much she sold her house and moved out of Wheat Ridge. Her realtor said she lost $20-30K because of the tower house next to her. The handout also included four sheets of the 30 original signatures that were collected last year supporting the 12½ ft bulk plane STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -3- and a 25 ft height limit. An additional 70 signatures are on file with the City from people who signed for a 15 ft bulk plane and 25 ft height limit. He made the point that there are only 740 houses in the R1-C and these 100 signatures were gathered in a very short amount of time. He asked Council to consider the 25 ft height limit in R1-C only; it’s only 11% of the City – an isolated area of small lots and small houses. He asked them to keep Wheat Ridge, Wheat Ridge. They don’t want to be Denver or the Highlands. They want to preserve their bungalow neighborhood. It’s the affordable part of Wheat Ridge and they don’t want to lose the small town feel they have with small lots that let them know all their neighbors. Peter Perrone (lives in WR) spoke about Item #2 – marijuana research license. • His company, Gobi Analytical on Youngfield, is the only marijuana testing lab in Wheat Ridge. They test medical and retail marijuana. • They do quality control testing for the marijuana industry. They make sure the products that are sold are true to their label, efficacious, and safe from contaminants such as ecoli, salmonella, yeast and mold. • They have a full microbiology lab that does food-testing for safety, and a full chemistry lab and instrumental analysis lab that does quality control testing similar to what he did for 20 years on pharmaceuticals. • Since the State now allows a research license, they want to have that here is Wheat Ridge. The first step is to create that type of license. • As an analytical lab they would do DNA testing on plants for potency and contaminants. Currently very little research like this has been done on these products. • There are also other cannabinoid substances besides THC they would like to test – such as CBD that is used for epilepsy and PTSD. • They would not be doing any human testing. They would test the product before it’s consumed and after. • He stated this is a vital component of the state’s cannabis system that has been neglected here and throughout the world. • This is an opportunity to be on the forefront of cannabis research to make sure the products are safe, effective and are being consumed in the proper way for the proper ailments when people take them as medicine. Edith Weiss (WR) said she agrees with her neighbors on the issues of sunshine, selfishness and privacy. She added that these tower houses leave almost no green, no yard. They are so huge there is so much to heat and cool. For a planet that is warming up, she suggested it isn’t very forward thinking or smart to build so huge and leave so little land for bees and insects. Kim Calomino (WR) believes that bulk plane is a complicated matter not understood by builders or residents. She thinks Council has heard from a select group of people in District 1 who are not well informed. She said Wheat Ridge is one of two cities in the state that has height limits in its charter; it’s unique and limits affordable housing. She believes there is no advantage to further limiting height. Mostly she thinks it is a complicated issue that shouldn’t be dealt with in a piecemeal manner, isolating bulk plane then height and whatever else, as we address zoning issues that will decide what kind of community we want, what kind of homeowners we want to welcome, and what we want our community to look like. She noted the discussion of ADUs has not been STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -4- finished and thinks limiting height will limit the opportunity for carriage houses and ADUs over garages. She advised that these issues are complex and interactive and Council should be considered all together when the NRS and the Comprehensive Plan are reviewed. Council should not act hastily. ~ She added that she thinks research on marijuana is important and encouraged Council to allow that in Wheat Ridge. 1. Residential Height Limitations in R1-C – Ken Johnstone • Mr. Johnstone touched on the history of the bulk plane process. Regulations were adopted and have been an effective tool in that they do what was intended. Whether that is sufficient is under consideration. o We now have bigger setbacks – 8 ft for 2-story and 10-13 ft for 3-story. o There are people who want to limit the scale in east Wheat Ridge. o A survey was recently on the website for 16 days in November. o Council has set an update of the NRS as a policy priority for 2018 o At Council’s direction staff will include these issues in the biannual citizen survey. • He went through the staff memo and diagrams that describes the impact of 25 ft height limits on small lots. There is a slight impact on the ability to build a 2-story home. • The website survey showed mixed responses on additional height limits and restrictions on 3-story houses. • He pointed out the City zoning maps that were included in the packet. • He referenced Attachment #3 which showed the practical impact of the new bulk plane standards on a 50’x125’ lot that is a typical size in R1-C. • If Council wants to allow second story construction in R1-C, 25 ft might not be enough. • Any ordinance would go through the Planning Commission. • He explained the option of having overlay zones with restrictions in certain areas. Council discussion followed. Councilmember Mathews favors addressing this in all zones. On the issue of neighbor’s right vs property owner’s rights he noted we have zoning codes to maintain order in the community; we do lots of regulating. He suggested what folks want is for there to be consistency with the surroundings. Besides property rights there are also neighborhood rights. When people move into a neighborhood they have expectations that it will remain the same. Councilmember Fitzgerald would rather wait do it with the NRS study. 1) He urged his colleagues to look at what the 2005 NRS says about houses in District 1. He hopes to redo the NRS, align the goals, and finalize them at a retreat. Height restrictions would be contrary to what the 2005 NRS suggests for housing in District 1. 2) The people who did the online poll said they don’t want further height restrictions. 3) He doesn’t want to restudy something that’s already been studied; doing that puts aside discussion of things that could move our city forward. He also doesn’t want to discuss bulk plane, ADU’s or Air B&Bs until after the NRS is visited. Councilmember Davis thinks this should be looked at globally in all zones districts, and noted the zones are patchwork. She pointed out there are people who have invested STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -5- money in plans and she doesn’t think it’s fair to change the rules now. Plus, there are people with larger lots who may want to put a mother-in-law suite on their roof. Mr. Johnstone concurred that one of the pictures Mr. Epson handed out was of a house that was built before the bulk plane regulations were put in. Councilmember Hoppe stated this is the seventh time Council has addressed height, so this is not being swept under the rug. She believes the15 ft bulk plane regulations were well thought out, and 25 feet only allows for a single story – which she thinks is not prudent. She talked about people trying to grow in their homes and had questions about Attachment 3. She believes the 15 ft bulk plane has destroyed the option of a 3-story house going straight up near a property line, and since those houses now can’t offer any extra square footage they won’t be practical. Mr. Johnstone added the caveat of maximum lot coverage in R1-C which affects square footage. She supports a citizen charter review commission to look at the 35 foot height limit and other issues. She would like to see ADUs addressed with the NRS, but also noted that staff has full plates and recommended that Council prioritize its discussions. Councilmember Mathews reminded the body that we got to this point because we inherited Jefferson County zoning and a large housing stock that was already built. The forefathers did a good job, but likely didn’t envision “scraping” and 35 ft tall houses. Councilmember Duran reminded Council this discussion was asked for in June/July 2016; this isn’t bait and switch because we didn’t have this discussion when we should have [with the bulk plane]. She supports the 25 ft limit in R1-C and is worried that while Council takes the time to discuss ADUs and Air B&Bs the neighborhood is being changed dramatically. This is only 740 homes that are unique/special to the area. She doesn’t want to lose that while the discussion is delayed because we have concerns about other developers coming in. She also doesn’t favor piecemeal action, but reminded Council of all the neighbors who live here that signed in support of 25 feet. Failure to act on this will drive them from their homes. Councilmember Dozeman thinks the bulk plane was a good compromise, and that it made dramatic restrictions. She appreciates the desire to preserve the neighborhood, but thinks piecemealing this together is requiring people to enter an HOA without having agreed to that. Concerning neighbors’ right vs property rights, she thinks the bulk plane restrictions are adequate. She doesn’t support government creating restrictions after the fact. Imposing these restrictions will prevent people from growing in the community. Councilmember Urban noted the NRS recommends deciding who the residents of Wheat Ridge will be. Do we care about the people who live here now, or are we wanting a different kind of resident to move here? He thinks the bulk plane offered some compromise, but believes an overlay area would also be a good compromise for this small area. By not putting any restrictions we are pushing current residents out to make way for new ones; that’s not acceptable to him. We should be able to welcome new residents in without an expense to current residents. He thinks 25 feet is a good compromise. While 35 feet may be appropriate for most of the city, in this small R1-C area putting 3-story towers next to 1-story ranch houses becomes onerous. Councilmember Hoppe disagreed that it’s not one or the other. She reported receiving calls and emails from people who live in R1-C in Wheat Ridge that do not support 25 feet, so she doesn’t think failure to support 25 feet is failure to support current residents. STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -6- She also noted that most of the people who took the survey said the City shouldn’t prohibit 2-story houses or lower the height restrictions. Councilmember Duran reminded Council of the 100 R1-C people who signed a petition for 25 feet. She asked Mr. Johnstone to explain overlay zones. He explained why overlay zones are done and how they can be applied to smaller geographic areas. This could be crafted to apply only to the R1-C lots in District 1. He reported that variances would still be allowed and that the City has a pretty high allowance for administrative variances; up to 50% variance is allowed if most of the criteria are met. Protest would trigger a hearing before the Board of Adjustments. Councilmember Duran asked for consensus to limit new construction of one and two family houses to 25 ft high in all zones by establishing an overlay zone in a specific area. The consensus failed by a vote of 3-5. Councilmember Hoppe received consensus to not move forward on the topic of 25 ft height maximum in any district. The vote was 5-3. 2. Marijuana Research & Development Licenses – Carmen Berry Carmen Beery highlighted her memo explaining that during the 2017 session the state legislature created yet another category of marijuana enterprise – a research and development license and a research and development cultivation license. Testing facilities that focus primarily on quality control are already allowed, and Wheat Ridge has one of those. This new license is more about research developing new products by conducting clinical trials. Both testing and clinical trials on animals and humans are potentially authorized. The question for Council is do you want to have this type of license in Wheat Ridge, and if so, where can they locate. Discussion followed. • Councilmember Pond supports bringing research into the community. • Councilmember Davis supports looking into this, but would like more clarification about the regulations. • Councilmember Hoppe supports bringing forward licensing options. If there are clinical trials on humans, she would like to have some boundaries on location. • Councilmember Duran supports the concept but has questions about protocol. • Councilmember Mathews thinks R & D is ambiguous. Five categories are listed, but the level of local oversite is unclear to him. • Councilmember Urban supports and would encourage pharmaceutical and nutraceutical R & D in the city. These would be high-paying jobs. Beyond some questions of where and how this would be done, he would prefer to leave it up to the state’s scientific advisory board to determine what is appropriate to be researched and what is not. The City does not have the expertise. He asked if this applies to industrial hemp. Ms. Beery explained that some of these questions will be answered by the State in the regulations that have already been set up. This goes into effect January 1. She knows hemp testing is not allowed with this license. Mr. Johnstone added that industrial hemp is allowed in industrial districts as a separate activity. STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -7- Councilmember Fitzgerald suggested this license would produce no extra traffic for the Gobi firm. He thinks we are fortunate to have them here. He asked if there is a time frame. Mr. Perrone said they will be making proposals (bidding) on research projects to firms in Boulder and Denver, and they do have competitors. From a competitive standpoint, they would like to be first. Councilmember Pond offered his thoughts on research testing. Mr. Perrone reported that they already are prohibited from growing and selling marijuana; they also cannot have it consumed on their premises or partner with anyone who does. They have no intention of doing clinical trials -- that will be done at hospitals and research institutions that already have cancer and other patients. They would test samples prior to being given to the patients to ensure potency and freedom from contamination. There may also be testing blood and urine following consumption and the effects of nutrients and pesticides on plants. Councilmember Davis said she is happy to hear this testing is separate from federally regulated testing. Councilmember Mathews asked how this testing will be different than the testing that is done now. Mr. Perrone explained that right now all they can do is quality control testing for licensed growers and edible manufacturers. Once hospitals and universities get research licenses Gobi will be able to do related testing for them. Councilmember Mathews asked if this would require a new type of license or if the City could just expand the allowed activities for existing testing licenses. Ms. Berry said that certainly could be an option. The facilities would still need the required state license. Ms. Berry confirmed for Councilmember Urban that the City has the authority to amend the list of allowed activities. Councilmember Fitzgerald received consensus to direct staff to create an ordinance, as simple as possible, to allow for marijuana testing associated with research and development. 3. Sign Code Regulations – Zack Wallace Mendez, City Planner II Mr. Mendez explained that Council previous preferences on the sign code went to Planning Commission. He presented issues that are still unsettled. Yard signs on residential properties. Council wanted no limits. The Planning Commission has concerns about that, and suggests limiting the number to preserve neighborhood integrity and prevent visual clutter. Following discussion Councilmember Urban received consensus to not limit the number of yard signs. Free standing signs The previous consensus was to require monument signs with new development; replacements could be monument or free standing. Following discussion Councilmember Urban received consensus to stick with the existing consensus. Non-conforming signs -- Need to set a time The Planning Commission proposed a 3-year amortization of non-conforming signs, and a 10-year amortization of all pole signs. Following discussion Councilmember Hoppe received consensus to bring this back at a future date with more information about how STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -8- many non-conforming signs there are, including information from the WRBD. There will be no amortization schedule at this time. Changeable copy signs (LED) Currently these signs are not allowed in MUN or Mixed Use-Commercial TOD. Previously there was 3-3 vote to keep it the same and Mayor Jay voted to keep it the same. What would Council like to do? Discussion focused primarily around the possibility of doing a carve-out to allow a changeable copy sign at Sevens Elementary School. Councilmember Pond received consensus to continue prohibition in MUN and MUC TOD. The vote was 5-3. No decision was reached about whether or not to do a carve-out for Stevens Elementary. Staff will return with information about variances for schools. A break was taken at 9:35pm. The study session resumed at 9:37pm. 4. Freestanding Emergency Rooms – Kenneth Johnstone This is a new use that has emerged in the state. The state has not adopted any regulations. The City currently only allows them in hospital zones or MUC. We have done moratoriums to buy time until the state does something. There is talk that the state may enact regulations this session. We could extend our moratorium for 90 days and begin drafting regulations now, or we can do nothing and let our current restrictions prevail. Brief discussion followed. Councilmember Hoppe received consensus to extend the moratorium for 120 days. 5. Staff Report(s) Mr. Goff relayed a question from Deputy Clerk Robin Eaton asking if the Council wants to continue having the position of Library Liaison. The person appointed to that position has never reported to Council and cannot be reached. There was agreement to continue the position and to advertise for it. 6. Elected Officials Report(s) Mayor Starker reported the Metro Mayor’s Caucus has solicited support of a letter to Senators Bennet and Gardner in support of the Dream Act. There was support. He will bring it back in January. ADJOURNMENT The Study Session adjourned at 9:44pm. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 12, 2018 ________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Tim Fitzgerald, Mayor Pro Tem STUDY SESSION NOTES: December 18, 2017 Page -9- SPECIAL STUDY SESSION NOTES CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO City Council Chambers 7500 W. 29th Avenue January 8, 2018 Upon adjournment of the Regular City Council Meeting Mayor Bud Starker called the Special Study Session to order at 10:54 p.m. Council members present: George Pond, Janeece Hoppe, Monica Duran, Tim Fitzgerald, Zachary Urban, Leah Dozeman, and Larry Mathews Absent: Kristi Davis (excused) Also present: City Clerk, Janelle Shaver; City Attorney, Jerry Dahl; City Manager, Patrick Goff; other staff, guests and interested citizens. CITIZEN COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS none APPROVAL OF AGENDA 1. Clear Creek Crossing I-70 Hook Ramp Construction Mr. Goff reported that related to the I-70 hook ramps the City has two proposed IGA’s – one with CDOT and one with the Long’s Peak Metropolitan District. He introduced • Steve Nguyen, our Engineering Manager, • Kim Seter of Seter & Vanderwall, LLC, who represents the Metropolitan District, and • Tyler Carlson of Evergreen Devco if Council would like to ask them questions. Steve Nguyen summarized. • The IGA with CDOT sets the terms for modifying/reconstructing the ramps in full compliance with CDOT standards and defines long-term maintenance responsibilities. • The IGA with Long’s Peak sets who is responsible for the construction of the ramps and for compliance with CDOT standards (quality assurance, testing standards, etc.) in dealing with Evergreen. Mr. Goff informed Council • The hook ramps will be paid for with 2E funds up to $10M. • Construction will be by Mortenson Construction, who is Evergreen’s contractor. Mr. Dahl suggested Council think of the IGA with the Metropolitan District as the City being the owner, and Longs Peak being the general contractor. The City is contracting with Long’s Peak to produce this improvement. The City’s obligation is to pay -- $10M, less money that has already been spent such as money to the Denver Water Board for the changes to the bore tunnel. Costs beyond $10M will be the responsibility of Long’s Peak. This arrangement protects the City from the risk of cost over-runs. Mr. Seter stressed that he, Mr. Goff and Mr. Dahl have been talking about this agreement for a while, but wanted Council to be aware that Long’s Peak has not yet SPECIAL STUDY SESSION NOTES: January 8, 2018 Page -2- seen this agreement or made commitments to pay for the entire project. Mr. Goff agreed some negotiation is yet to happen, but he wanted to get an update to Council. Council questions Mr. Urban suggested there seems to be a traffic jam of players with the City contracting with AECOM and coordinating with the Metro District, who is then contracting with Evergreen, who is contracting with Mortenson. He asked why the City wasn’t doing the contracting. Mr. Goff said it is more efficient and cost effective to have Long’s Peak build the ramps; the service plan the City approved with them gives them the authority to build these infrastructure improvements. Staff capacity is an issue; the City has several projects going on right now. AECOM is just a staff extension that will help manage the project with billing, invoicing and making sure the CDOT standards are met. Projects with multi-party agreements are common for CDOT. Councilmember Fitzgerald asked for consensus to suspend the rules and go past 11:00pm. The consensus was approved 6-1. Councilmember Mathews had two questions: Was the project put out for public bids and awarded to the lowest responsible bidder? Should the project be completed for less than $10M, who keeps the left over money? o Tyler Carlson noted that Evergreen is not a direct party to this contract. It’s an IGA between the District and the City. Evergreen is the controlling member of the District with three seats on the Board; Coors has two seats. He stated that Mortenson is only being hired as a construction manager to facilitate the bidding process. Mortenson may bid on the project, but the Metro District will compare the bids and make a recommendation to the City. The City will select their choice for the most qualified bidder. o Mr. Carlson said it’s also important to note is that the District is not being compensated for this work. Third party costs will be reimbursed, but there is no fee for this. He agreed with Councilmember Urban and would rather not have the District building the improvements, but it is a staffing issue for the City. There are also other district improvements later in the year that will roll into this – so it does end up being more efficient. The Districts goal is to be good stewards for the City – to be eyes and ears for bidding, contracting, and facilitating – to make sure it’s done properly. The District has the staff to do it. It’s also not a stipulated sum contract. Mr. Goff indicated this will come to another study session so there can be more discussion. ADJOURNMENT The Special Study Session adjourned at 11:08p.m. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 12, 2018 _________________________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Tim Fitzgerald, Mayor pro tem SPECIAL STUDY SESSION NOTES: January 8, 2018 Page -3- ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 10-2018 – A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018 BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE RE-APPROPRIATION AND RE-ENCUMBRANCE OF 2017 FISCAL YEAR ENCUMBERED FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,814,603.10 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Administrative Services Director City Manager ISSUE: There are 55 open purchase orders from the 2017 budget that need to be carried over to the 2018 budget. Each purchase order is associated with a specific project that was not fully completed in the 2017 fiscal year. The funds which were encumbered for these purchase orders were transferred to the unreserved fund balance of the relevant fund when the purchase orders were closed. To continue or close out these projects in 2018, a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $3,814,603.10 is necessary to allow transfer of these funds into specific budget line items in the 2018 Budget. PRIOR ACTION: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: A supplemental budget appropriation is requested in the amount of $3,814,603.10. When the purchase orders were closed on December 31, 2017, the funds encumbered for those purchase orders are transferred to the unreserved fund balance in each of the funds listed below. Therefore, there are adequate funds in the various unreserved fund balances to meet this request and there will not be a net negative effect to the unreserved fund balances. A detailed list of open purchase orders for 2017 is attached. The funds will be distributed as follows: Council Action Form – Budget Carryovers February 12, 2018 Page 2 General Fund $ 648,284.71 Police Investigation Fund $ 24,800.00 Capital Investment Program Fund (CIP) $ 1,259,258.77 Bond Issue 2E $ 486,462.49 Open Space Fund $ 1,084,331.28 Conservation Trust Fund $ 264,297.25 Equipment Replacement Fund $ 47,168.60 Total: $ 3,814,603.10 BACKGROUND: Swanhorst & Company LLC, the City’s independent auditor, included the following note and recommendation in their 2004 Audit Management Letter dated March 25, 2005: The City currently utilizes encumbrance accounting. State budget law requires the re-appropriation of purchase orders and projects for each new budget year. While the City is a home-rule City and is not required to follow the state law, current practice throughout Colorado does not include the use of encumbrances. We recommend that the City consider utilizing generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for its budgeting basis. City Council adopted the 2004 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report on August 8, 2005, and approved a motion to direct staff to implement this recommendation. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the supplemental budget appropriations. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Resolution No. 10-2018 – A resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2018 Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the re-appropriation and re-encumbrance of the 2017 fiscal year encumbered funds in the amount of $3,814,603.10.” Or, “I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution No. 10-2018, a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2018 Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the re-appropriation and re-encumbrance of the 2017 fiscal year encumbered funds in the amount of $3,814,603.10 for the following reason(s) _______________________________.” REPORT PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY: Jennifer Nellis, Purchasing and Contracting Agent Heather Geyer, Administrative Services Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 10-2018 2. Open Purchase Order Report for 2017 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 10 Series of 2018 TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2018 BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE RE-APPROPRIATION AND RE-ENCUMBRANCE OF 2017 FISCAL YEAR ENCUMBERED FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,814,603.10 WHEREAS, the City’s independent auditor has recommended that the City utilize generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for its budgeting basis which requires all encumbrances to expire at year end; and WHEREAS, 55 purchase orders remained open on December 31, 2017; and WHEREAS, to continue these projects in 2018 a supplemental budget appropriation is necessary to transfer the funds from unreserved fund balances to specific 2018 budget line items: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows: A. The City of Wheat Ridge fiscal year 2018 Budget be amended accordingly, specifically transferring a total of $3,814,603.10 from the following unreserved fund balances to specific 2018 Budget line items as detailed in the attached spreadsheets: General Fund $ 648,284.71 Police Investigation Fund $ 24,800.00 Capital Investment Program Fund (CIP) $ 1,259,258.77 Bond Issue 2E $ 486,462.49 Open Space Fund $ 1,084,331.28 Conservation Trust Fund $ 264,297.25 Equipment Replacement Fund $ 47,168.60 Total: $ 3,814,603.10 DONE AND RESOLVED this 12th day of February 2018. Bud Starker, Mayor ATTEST: Janelle Shaver, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 1 OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 1 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME General Fund 01-102-700-780 OUTSIDE AGENCY CONTRIBUTIONS 61999/1 11/09/2017 COMMUNITY OUTREACH FUNDS 1 1,800.00$ 1,800.00$ 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 01-102-700-780 TOTAL 1,800.00$ 01-105-700-721 NRS IMPLEMENTATION 61875/2 01/25/2017 RIDGE AT 38TH STRATEGIC PLAN 1 $ 10,000.00 $ 77,000.00 30132 LOCALWORKS 61875/3 01/25/2017 CORE PROGRAMS - RIDGE AT 38TH 1 $ 8,242.70 $ 249,000.00 30132 LOCALWORKS 01-105-700-721 TOTAL 18,242.70$ 326,000.00$ 01-106-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61848/2 12/31/2016 ENCUMBER FUNDS FOR CLEAR CREEK CROSSING CONSULTANT SERVICES 1 $ 6,012.50 $ 15,750.00 31250 ECONOMIC & PLANNING SYSTEMS 01-106-700-750 TOTAL $ 6,012.50 01-107-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61889/2 02/02/2017 INCREASE FOR VARIOUS LEGAL SERVICES 1 $ 499.54 $ 4,500.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 01-107-700-750 TOTAL $ 499.54 Description: PO 61848 is for financial consulting services in support of the City's evaluation of the need for public financing assistance to provide developers with a reasonable rate of return at the Clear Creek Crossing project. Evaluation work will continue in 2018. Description: The remaining balance of PO 61875 is being used for the purchase of banners for the light poles that are being replaced. The banners were not complete as of December 31, 2017, however have been received in January of 2018. The invoice will be paid and the PO closed once the carryovers are approved and allocated. Description: Legal services were requested by Human Resources in late December, and the charge for that time was not included in the last invoice for service provided. Description: Mayor Jay encumbered funds on PO 61999 to be carried over to 2018 for a use to be identified by Mayor Starker. ATTACHMENT 2 OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 2 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 01-113-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61835/1 12/07/2016 G-LINE GRAND OPENING PARTY 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 01-113-700-750 TOTAL $ 20,000.00 01-117-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61827/2 10/27/2016 TRAINING AND DEDICATED SUPPORT 1 2,812.50$ 7,200.00$ 31427 DATA MANAGEMENT, INC. 01-117-700-750 TOTAL 2,812.50$ 01-117-800-806 61826/1 10/25/2016 CONVERSION OF RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT INFO 1 4,425.00$ 8,520.00$ 740 AMERICAN DATA GROUP, INC. 01-117-800-806 TOTAL 4,425.00$ 01-118-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 61948/1 06/05/2017 PLUMBING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION DOC 1 674.20$ 7,054.00$ 31528 THE BALLARD GROUP, INC. 62000/1 11/09/2017 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 1 2,980.00$ 3,700.00$ 31595 RMH GROUP 62016/1 12/22/2017 SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 1 7,669.00$ 7,669.00$ 31529 IPARAMETRICS 01-118-700-750 TOTAL 11,323.20$ Description: The remaining balance of PO 61827 is for TimeClock Plus time and attendance software training and product support, for modules not yet being used. Work continues as staff expands the use of this software product now to part-time employees. Description: PO 61826 is for work being done to convert a Right-of-Way access database to the ADG permit module. Completion of the conversion is ongoing. Description: RTD was unable to open the G-Line in 2016, nor in 2017 as hoped, and the opening date is yet to be determined. These funds are specific to the G-Line Grand Opening Party for the Ward Rd. TOD Station in Wheat Ridge. Description: PO 61948 is for plumbing renovations needed at City Hall, the remaining balance is for services not yet rendered for construction oversight. Construction is budgeted in 2018. PO 62000 is for replacement of transfer switches at City Hall, the project is not complete and additional design work is needed. PO 62016 is for the development of a security management plan as follow-up to the assessment completed in 2017. Work on the plan is not complete. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 3 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 01-122-700-704 CONTRACTUAL SVCS BUILDING INSPECTION 61962/3 07/11/2017 ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING INSPECTION SVC 1 $ 9,850.00 $ 605,000.00 31522 CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES 61962/07/11/2017 BUILDING INSPECTION SERVICES $ 183,298.75 $ 183,298.75 01-122-700-704 TOTAL $ 193,148.75 01-201-800-802 OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 61843/1 12/21/2016 POLICE CHIEF CONFERENCE ROOM CHAIRS 1 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 20103 OFFICESCAPES 01-201-800-802 TOTAL $ 3,000.00 01-207-650-657 RANGE SUPPLIES POLICE TRAINING 62008/2 12/05/2017 1000/CASE SPEER GOLD DOT AMMO 4 1,372.00$ 1,372.00$ 22923 ULTRAMAX AMMUNITION 62008/3 1000/CASE SPEER GOLD DOT AMMO 4 1,232.00$ 1,232.00$ 62008/4 1000/CASE SPEER GOLD DOT AMMO 3 1,134.00$ 1,134.00$ 62008/5 1000/CASE SPEER GOLD DOT AMMO 1 326.00$ 326.00$ 01-207-650-657 TOTAL 4,064.00$ 01-303-650-660 OPERATING SUPPLIES STREET MAINTENANCE 61870/1 01/18/2017 2017 ROAD & SALT DE-ICER 1 $ 18,250.00 $ 175,000.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 01-303-650-660 TOTAL $ 18,250.00 Description: PO 61843 encumbers funds for the purchase of chairs for the Chief's conference room. The choice of chairs was not finalized before year-end. Chairs will be ordered in 2018. Description: PO 62008 represents items ordered, but not received in 2017. Description: PO 61962 represents the balance for contracted building inspection services, performed on an on-call basis, and significantly impacted by the May 8, 2017 hail event in the City and region. Following approval of carry-overs and the Resolution for a Supplemental Budget Appropriation approved payments for November and December 2017 will be paid and will close out PO 61962. Description: PO 61870 balance is needed to pay one last invoice for a 200 Ton salt order requested in 2017, but not delivered until January 2018. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 4 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 01-303-700-704 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 61988/1 09/14/2017 REPAIR CLOCKS & MONUMENT SIGNS 1 $ 3,705.72 $ 3,705.72 31572 GREENLINE SIGN SERVICES 61988/2 REPAIR 4 CLOCKS 1 $ 2,655.00 $ 2,655.00 01-303-700-704 TOTAL $ 6,360.72 01-303-800-807 FLEET REPLACEMENT 61963/1 07/12/2017 UPFIT FOR UNIT 245 1 $ 98,708.00 $ 98,708.00 31304 AUTO TRUCK GROUP 01-303-800-807 TOTAL $ 98,708.00 01-601-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 62013/1 12/19/2017 ANALYSIS OF PFOS DIVISION ORGANIZATION 1 4,800.00$ 4,800.00$ 30807 ERIC S. MARBURGER 01-601-700-750 TOTAL 4,800.00$ 01-603-700-774 FACILITY REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 62004/1 11/15/2017 KIOSKS FOR CREEKSIDE & FOUNDER'S PARK 1 16,498.00$ 16,498.00$ 30939 ICON SHELTER SYSTEMS INC 62024/1 12/29/2017 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC ART FOUNDER's 1 2,775.00$ 2,775.00$ 31570 ART MANAGEMENT & PLANNING 01-603-700-774 TOTAL 19,273.00$ 01-603-800-809 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 61996/1 10/11/2017 JOHN DEERE UTILITY TRACTOR 1 40,933.35$ 40,933.35$ 31111 DEERE & COMPANY 01-603-800-809 TOTAL 40,933.35$ Description: PO 61996 is for the purchase of a new tractor, John Deere is experiencing long lead times, and delivery is not anticipated until May or June, 2018. Description: PO 61963 is for a hydraulic system truck dump body, lighting ordered for the new cab and chassis sand/snow plow truck, unit 245. The upfit workorder was initiated in mid-summer knowing that lead times for completion were long. The truck upfit is not yet complete, but delivery of the truck and bed is expected by early February, to be followed by decals and some specific auxiliary items. Description: PO 62004 for the kiosks is open as the kiosks were not delivered until January 2018, with installation expected in the next few months. PO 62024 is for cleaning of the sculpture in Founder's Park, which will be completed in 2018. Description: Work to repair clocks and monument signs at various locations along 38th Avenue was not completed in 2017 as parts are on order for these specialized, and older clocks. Description: PO 62013 represents analysis work and reporting that will not be completed by year end. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 5 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 01-604-700-704 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 61926/2 04/06/2017 ON-CALL FORESTRY MAINTENANCE SERVICES 1 $ 3,859.45 $ 11,500.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 01-604-700-704 TOTAL $ 3,859.45 01-605-700-704 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62022/1 12/28/2017 STABILIZATION OF SOUTH BANK OF CLR CRK 1 3,500.00$ 3,500.00$ 31612 ARROWHEAD LANDSCAPING 01-605-700-704 TOTAL 3,500.00$ 01-610-700-783 HAIL STORM LOSSES 61989/1 09/15/2017 LED PEDESTRIAN LIGHT POLE REPLACEMENT 1 $ 187,272.00 $ 187,272.00 31068 MOUNTAIN STATES LIGHTING 01-610-700-783 TOTAL $ 187,272.00 TOTAL 01 648,284.71$ 17-202-700-704 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62025/2 12/29/2017 TRAILER MOUNTING FOR READER EQUIPMENT 1 $ 4,800.00 $ 4,800.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 17-202-700-704 TOTAL $ 4,800.00 17-202-800-809 OTHER MAJOR EQUIPMENT 62025/1 12/29/2017 LICENSE PLATE READER EQUIPMENT 1 $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 17-202-800-809 TOTAL $ 20,000.00 TOTAL 17 $ 24,800.00 Description: PO 61836 represents the City of Wheat Ridge portion of a joint project with Urban Drainage. Due to use of seasonal planting materials, work is scheduled for Spring 2018. Description: The remaining balance of this PO 61926 is for stump grinding work not completed in 2017. Description: PO 61989 is for 72 light poles with accessories for replacement along 38th Ave. as a result of the May 8, 2017 hail storm. Poles were received in January 2018. Police Investigations Fund Description: Funds encumbered for crime prevention equipment (Justice Assistance Grant approved for a license plate reader), to be purchased in 2018. Description: Funds encumbered for a trailer purchase and for mounting the crime prevention equipment (Justice Assistance Grant approved for a license plate reader), to be purchased in 20 POLICE INVESTIGATIONS FUND GENERAL FUND OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 6 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME Capital Project Fund 30-302-800-833 MISC DRAINAGE IMPROVE ENGINEERING 62021/1 12/28/2017 COMBINE WITH MINOR STREETS PROJECTS 1 60,000.00$ 60,000.00$ 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 62021/3 12/31/2017 STREET PROJECT INCREASED ENCUMBRANCE 1 92,132.00$ 30-302-800-833 TOTAL 152,132.00$ 30-302-800-840 STREET IMPROVEMENTS & MAINTENANCE 62021/2 12/28/2017 2017 MINOR STREET PROJECTS 1 $ 230,000.00 $ 230,000.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 30-302-800-840 TOTAL $ 230,000.00 30-303-800-841 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING DEVELOPMENT 61993/1 09/28/2017 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING TRAFFIC STUDY 1 32,731.59$ 88,409.05$ 30978 WSP USA INC. 61993/2 09/28/2017 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING DEVELOPMENT 1 29,183.02$ 55,100.00$ 30978 WSP USA INC. 62015/2 12/22/2017 CCC DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 1 50,000.00$ 50,000.00$ 31608 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 30-303-800-841 TOTAL 111,914.61$ Description: PO 62017 design is complete, but construction observation will occur in 2018. PO 62021 line 1 encumbers funds for work that was out to bid at the end of the year and will be awarded in early 2018. Line 3 increases the encumbrance for the combined projects. Description: PO 62021 line 2 encumbers funds for work that was out to bid at the end of the year and will be awarded in early 2018. Description: Regarding PO 61993, the engineering work for a traffic study specific to the Clear Creek Crossing Development is ongoing. Project work was expanded again in 2017, as seen in the line item increases to the PO. Engineering work will continue in 2018. PO 62015 line 2 is specific to development review services, supplementing City staff, for projects other than the hook ramp construction at the Clear Creek Crossing site. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 7 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 30-303-800-851 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 61908/1 03/08/2017 SIGNAL DESIGN FOR APPLEWOOD CENTER 1 $ 400.00 $ 31,865.00 31484 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 61956/1 06/21/2017 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAST AND POLE 1 $ 10,623.00 $ 11,113.00 31541 MILLERBERND MFG. CO. 61956/2 06/21/2017 LONGER SIGNAL MAST AND POLE 1 $ 16,887.00 $ 17,597.00 31541 MILLERBERND MFG. CO. 62018/1 12/28/2017 APPLEWOOD SIGNAL CONSTRUCTION 1 $ 294,921.00 $ 294,921.00 13170 W.L. CONTRACTORS, INC. 62018/2 12/28/2017 PROJECT CONTINGENCY 1 $ 29,492.00 $ 29,492.00 13170 W.L. CONTRACTORS, INC. 30-303-800-851 TOTAL $ 352,323.00 30-303-800-861 ADA TRANSITION PLAN 61806/1 08/10/2016 ADA TRANSITION PLAN CONSULTANT 1 $ 4,820.97 $ 43,247.60 31380 ALFRED BENESCH & COMPANY 61806/2 08/10/2016 ADDITION TO SCOPE 1 $ 2,939.03 $ 2,939.03 31380 ALFRED BENESCH & COMPANY 30-303-800-861 TOTAL $ 7,760.00 30-303-800-865 WADSWORTH EA - DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION 61766/2 05/10/2016 ENVIRONMENTAL ENG. CONSULT. CONTIN.1 $ 45,328.46 $ 120,000.00 31330 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. 61766/4 05/10/2016 INCREASE FOR GRANT APPLICATION 1 $ 27,075.58 $ 32,000.00 31330 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. 61766/6 05/10/2016 INCREASE FOR HISTORICAL ASSESS AFFECT 1 $ 166,034.68 $ 172,878.36 31330 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. 30-303-800-865 TOTAL $ 238,438.72 Description: The PO 61908 balance is for construction observation and material acceptance services to be performed in 2018 when the traffic signal poles/masts are received, and when construction at the intersection is underway. PO 61956 is for several sizes of poles and masts for the new Applewood Center signal. PO 62018 was issued following the approved award for construction of the intersection and installation of the traffic signal components. Work is underway in 2018. Description: PO 61806 represents hiring a consultant to assist the City in developing an ADA Transition Plan for curbs/ramps, sidewalks and other improvements needed in the right-of-way; and to begin repairs and corrections based on identified priorities, following a RFP process conducted in 2016. Work continues into 2018. Description: PO 61766 is for the consultant work being done by HDR Engineering, Inc. on the Environmental Assessment (EA) aspect of reconfiguring Wadsworth Blvd. This step is required following a PEL, and prior to construction. Work on the EA continued through 2017, and was significantly expanded due to concern about historic property determinations. HDR will continue to provide consulting services on this project in 2018, and has yet to invoice the City for 2017 expenses at the end of the year. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 8 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 30-303-800-884 PREVENTATIVE MAINT STREET MAINTENANCE 61663/1 12/23/2015 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 1 51,475.04$ 85,750.00$ 31269 EST, INC. 30-303-800-884 TOTAL 51,475.04$ 30-610-800-811 CITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL OPERATION 61158/1 12/31/2014 ENCUMBER FUNDS FOR COURT AREA REMODEL 1 63,000.00$ 63,000.00$ 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 30-610-800-811 TOTAL 63,000.00$ 30-610-800-872 ARIAL PHOTO/GIS UPDATES 61974/1 08/17/2017 LAND SURVEYING FOR ROW MAPPING ADJ 1 $ 12,015.00 $ 24,960.00 29613 FLATIRONS, INC. 30-610-800-872 TOTAL $ 12,015.00 30-610-800-873 PD EVIDENCE CLIMATE CONTROL 61927/1 42832 A&E FOR EVIDENCE BUILDING ADDITION 1 $ 1,923.40 $ 11,723.00 23164 OZ ARCHITECTURE OF DENVER 62019/1 43097 ENCUMBERED CONSTRUCTION FUNDS 1 $ 38,277.00 $ 38,277.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 30-610-800-873 TOTAL $ 40,200.40 TOTAL 30 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM FUND (CIP)1,259,258.77$ Description: PO 61974 remains open as the project was put on hold pending approval of the plat for Clear Creek Crossing. Description: PO 61927 remains open as a fire-suppression system must be approved by West Metro Fire, and the architect has not been able to complete the plans, and is under contract to the City to provide construction observation services. Additionally, invoices are being disputed, and will be paid applying a credit memo following approval of carryovers. PO 62019 Description: PO 61158 is to encumber funds for remodeling of the Court facilities and offices. Court staff has been discussing and planning for this project, but due to capacity has been unable to begin working with an architect or GC. The project remains a priority. Description: PO 61663, issued to EST, Inc. in December of 2015, represents program funds intended for engineering services and analysis of deficient bridges in three locations. Work is underway and as funds are approved for bridge repairs, EST will provide project specific structural plans. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 9 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 31-101-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - CCC HOOK RAMPS 62015/1 12/22/2017 CCC HOOK RAMP ENGINEERING PROF. SERVICES 1 78,378.00$ 78,378.00$ 31608 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 62028/1 12/31/2017 TASK A PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PORTION 1 72,933.99$ 74,806.00$ 31608 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 31-101-700-750 TOTAL 151,311.99$ 31-102-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - WARD ROAD 62023/1 12/28/2017 WARD ROAD ENGINEERING PROF. SERVICES 1 29,487.82$ 34,650.00$ 31608 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 62028/3 12/31/2017 TASK A PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PORTION 1 27,627.90$ 28,337.00$ 31608 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 31-102-700-750 TOTAL 57,115.72$ 31-102-800-801 VISIONING 61942/1 05/25/2017 WARD RD. STORM WATER ASSESSMENT 1 3,213.12$ 24,850.00$ 31520 OLSSON ASSOCIATES 61997/1 10/27/2017 WARD RD. BRIDGE VISIONING 1 12,025.20$ 40,500.00$ 30978 WSP USA INC. 31-102-800-801 TOTAL 15,238.32$ 31-103-700-750 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - WADSWORTH BLVD 61766/5 05/10/2016 INCREASE FOR GRANT PREPARATION 1 6,768.89$ 8,000.00$ 31330 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. 61766/7 05/10/2016 INCREASE FOR HISTORICAL ASSESSMENT 1 95,332.84$ 97,043.76$ 31330 HDR ENGINEERING, INC. 62028/2 12/31/2017 TASK A PROGRAM MANAGEMENT PORTION 1 9,944.73$ 10,200.00$ 31608 AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES 31-103-700-750 TOTAL 112,046.46$ Description: PO 62015 represents the funds allocated to Task B of the professional services agreement, and only for what was thought to be needed in 2017. There will not be any invoices to pay from the 2017 budget, as services related to this PO will begin in 2018. PO 62028 is for program management services prorated by the percent of work funded for each project, and will continue through 2018. Description: PO 62023 represents funds allocated to Task E of the professional services agreement, 2017 portion only. As seen, a small percentage of work has been complete, with services continuing in 2018. PO 62028 is for program management services prorated by the percent of work funded for each project, and will continue through 2018. Description: PO 61942 represents ongoing assessment services, as development of the Ward Rd. Station is considered. PO 61997 is for a bridge visioning assessment report , and remains open in the event that further analysis is needed. Description: This portion of PO 61766, line items 5 and 7, are specific to the 2E bond fund account identified as Fund 31. Work on the EA continued through 2017, and was significantly expanded due to concern about historic property determinations. HDR will continue to provide consulting services on this project in 2018, and has yet to invoice the City for 2017 expenses at the end of the year. PO 62028 is for program management services prorated by the percent of work funded for each project, and will continue through 2018. Ballot Issue 2E Fund OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 10 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 31-104-800-801 WATERLINE - ANDERSON PARK 62003/1 11/14/2017 RNR WATERLINE - ANDERSON PARK CONST.1 150,750.00$ 150,750.00$ 31270 DIAZ CONSTRUCTION GROUP 31-104-800-801 TOTAL 150,750.00$ TOTAL 31 486,462.49$ Open Space Fund 32-601-800-865 PW/PARKS OPERATIONS FACILITY 61785/2 07/05/2016 PHASE II - CONSTRUCTION ADMIN 1 950.81$ 3,000.00$ 31364 INTERGROUP ARCHITECTS 61949/1 06/06/2017 CONSTRUCT EQUIPMENT STORAGE BLDG 1 167,137.02$ 317,000.00$ 31530 DSRW ENT dba CALLAHAN CONST. 61950/1 06/07/2017 EQUIPMENT STORAGE BLDG CONTINGENCY 1 27,668.00$ 28,667.00$ 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 32-601-800-865 TOTAL 195,755.83$ 32-601-800-871 PARKS MAINTENANCE PROJECTS 61939/1 05/11/2017 IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTINGENCY 1 7,288.00$ 7,628.00$ 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 32-601-800-871 TOTAL 7,288.00$ 32-601-800-872 TRAIL REPLACEMENT/REPAIR62027/1 12/29/2017 JOHNSON PARK TRAIL REPLACEMENT PROJECT 1 198,294.00$ 198,294.00$ 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 32-601-800-872 TOTAL 198,294.00$ BALLOT ISSUE - 2E Description: PO 61939 represents contingency funds for the Panorama Park Irrigation replacement project. Work continues on the project into 2018, therefore contingency needs may still Description: PO 62027 is for the construction of a replacement portion of the Clear Creek Trail near Johnson Park, replacing asphalt with concrete. The project was bid in 2017, but all bids were over budget. The City has applied for a grant for a portion of this project, and execution of the award is anticipated in early 2018. The project will be divided and bid as two projects in Description: PO 61785 line 2 includes construction administration which will be needed in 2018. PO 61949 is for construction of the new storage facility for Parks equipment. Delays were encountered in 2017 due to steel shortages and wet weather. The projected completion date is targeted for mid March, 2018. PO 61950 represents contingency funds approved for the construction of the equipment storage building. Description: PO 62003 represents award of the reconstruction of the waterline at Anderson Park. A Notice to Proceed has been issued, with work to be completed in 2018. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 11 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 32-601-800-873 PROSPECT PARK IMPROVEMENTS 61818/2 09/27/2016 INCREASE PO FOR CLOMR/LOMR WORK 1 $ 2,079.80 $ 17,265.00 29985 DESIGN CONCEPTS INC61958/1 06/29/2017 PROSPECT PARK PHASE I CONSTRUCTION 1 $ 680,913.65 $ 1,998,690.00 22611 COLORADO DESIGNSCAPES 32-601-800-873 TOTAL $ 682,993.45 TOTAL 32 OPEN SPACE FUND 1,084,331.28$ Conservation Trust Fund 54-601-800-860 FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS 61778/1 06/17/2016 INDOOR POOL IMPROVEMENTS 1 5,800.00$ 56,085.00$ 31355 AQUATIC CHEMICAL SOLUTIONS 54-601-800-860 TOTAL 5,800.00$ 54-601-800-866 PROSPECT PARK RENOVATION 61955/1 06/20/2017 MATERIAL TESTING DURING CONSTRUCTION 1 $ 6,478.00 $ 7,543.00 30564 TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC. 61958/2 06/29/2017 PHASE I CONSTRUCTION PROJECT 1 $ 166,025.70 $ 210,310.00 22611 COLORADO DESIGNSCAPES 62026/1 12/29/2017 ENCUMBER FOR PHASE II CONSTRUCTION 1 $ 47,697.00 $ 47,697.00 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 54-601-800-866 TOTAL $ 220,200.70 Description: PO 61955 remains open for material testing as may be needed for Phase 1 construction at Prospect Park. PO 61958 representsPhase 1 construction not yet complete at Prospect Park. Issues with a sewer line delayed work in 2017, as sod cannot be laid until Spring. PO 62026 encumbers funds intended for Phase II construction, which will be bid out in Description: PO 61778 was for replacement of the indoor slide, and replacement of grates surrounding the indoor pool. Warranty work is still needed on the grates, to be replaced with factory molded corners. Description: PO 61818 line 2 is for CLOMR/LOMR assessment needed for Phase I renovations at Prospect Park. This is a phased project with park construction beginning in 2017, and continuing in 2018. PO 61958 is for construction of the Phase I work. Construction work was delayed in 2017 due to a sewer line issue and then to wet weather conditions. Phase 1 completion is anticipated by the end of May, 2018. OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 12 of 13 PO/LINE ORDERED DESCRIPTION OPEN QTY OPEN AMT ORIG AMT / NAME 54-601-800-870 RECREATION CENTER 62014/1 12/19/2017 OCTANE FITNESS EQUIPMENT 1 $ 4,795.00 $ 4,795.00 31607 FOUNDATION FITNESS 62014/2 12/19/2017 OCTANE FITNESS EQUIPMENT ACCESSORIES 1 $ 200.00 $ 200.00 31607 FOUNDATION FITNESS 62014/3 12/19/2017 INSTALLATION AND SHIPPING 1 $ 375.00 $ 375.00 31607 FOUNDATION FITNESS 54-601-800-870 TOTAL $ 5,370.00 54-601-800-873 RESURFACE TENNIS/BASKETBALL COURTS 61965/1 07/13/2017 TENNIS/SPORT COURT MAINTENANCE 1 $ 5,844.00 $ 20,154.00 23254 COATINGS, INC. 54-601-800-873 TOTAL $ 5,844.00 54-601-800-879 PANORAMA PARK IRRIGATION 61938/2 05/11/2017 IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION 1 $ 27,082.55 $ 40,197.00 31510 SABELL'S ENTERPRISES LLC 54-601-800-879 TOTAL $ 27,082.55 TOTAL 54 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 264,297.25$ 57-204-800-805 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT62020/1 12/28/2017 FUNDS FOR INSTALLING PD MOBILE RADIOS 1 47,168.60$ 47,168.60$ 22233 VARIOUS VENDORS 57-204-800-805 TOTAL 47,168.60$ TOTAL 57 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 47,168.60$ Description: PO 62020 represents funds encumbered to install new mobile radio equipment in police vehicles. The person working on the purchase and installation of equipment is no longer an employee of the City. The next phase for bidding and scheduling installation has been reassigned effective January 30, 2018. Description: PO 61938 line 2 remains open as the irrigation system requires warranty repairs, and sod replacement in the Spring of 2018. Description: PO 62014 for fitness equipment replacement at the recreation center, is open as the equipment was not received until January 3, 2018. Following approval of the carry overs, this PO will be paid and closed out. Description: The balance of PO 61965 represents work needed on the courts at the Apel Baker facility. This work requires warm weather, and will be scheduled for May 2018. Equipment Replacement OPEN PURCHASE ORDER REPORT FOR 2017 END OF YEAR Page 13 of 13 FUND TOTALS TOTAL 01 648,284.71$ TOTAL 17 POLICE INVESTIGATION FUND 24,800.00$ TOTAL 30 CAPITAL INVESTMENT PROGRAM FUND (CIP)1,259,258.77$ TOTAL 31 BOND ISSUE 2E 486,462.49$ TOTAL 32 OPEN SPACE FUND 1,084,331.28$ TOTAL 54 CONSERVATION TRUST FUND 264,297.25$ TOTAL 57 47,168.60$ GRAND TOTAL 3,814,603.10$ EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND GENERAL FUND ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE PAYMENT TO KAISER PERMANENTE FOR JANUARY 2018 MEMBERSHIP BILLING IN THE AMOUNT OF $195,189.45 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Administrative Services Director City Manager ISSUE: For 2018, the City offers employees two medical plans through Kaiser Permanente; a High Deductible plan and Deductible HMO Plan. Both plans are also offered as COBRA protection for former employees who choose to enroll. January monthly billing is in the amount of $195,189.45 which requires City Council approval. PRIOR ACTION: None. FINANCIAL IMPACT: While monthly costs vary depending on the number of employees and dependents enrolled, for 2018 these costs will average around $195,000 per month. The January 2018 bill is for active and COBRA membership billing. Monthly bills over $75,000 will be brought to City Council for approval. BACKGROUND: Kaiser Permanente has been the City of Wheat Ridge’s medical plan provider for several years. Based on the City’s shift to two deductible plans and a robust wellness program, Kaiser plan renewals have been minimal compared to the market the past two years. Council Action Form – Kaiser January 2018 Billing February 12, 2018 Page 2 RECOMMENDATIONS: It is our recommendation to pay the January 2018 Kaiser bill. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to pay the January 2018 Kaiser bill in the total amount of $195,189.45. Or, “I move to deny the payment of the January 2018 Kaiser bill in the amount of $195,189.45 for the following reason(s) _______________________________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Tamara Dixon, Human Resources Manager Heather Geyer, Administrative Services Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2018 January Kaiser Bill ATTACHMENT 1 ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO AWARD A CONTRACT, AND APPROVE SUBSEQUENT PAYMENTS, TO DIAZ CONSTRUCTION GROUP, LAKEWOOD, CO IN THE AMOUNT OF $347,392, WITH A CONTINGENCY AMOUNT OF $34,740 FOR THE 2017 MISCELLANEOUS STREET AND DRAINAGE PROJECT PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Public Works Director City Manager ISSUE: The bid package for the 2017 Miscellaneous Street and Drainage Project included proposed improvements at four locations across the City. Since this project included work at multiple locations, the individual projects were packaged separately as follows: Base bid - reconstruct Union Street south of 34th Place Alternate 1 - construct a drainage channel within Union Street right-of-way north of 32nd Drive Alternate 2 - replace an irrigation crossing under Miller Street at W 50th Avenue Alternate 3 - construct curb/gutter along the west side of Ames Street north of W 26th Avenue. Bids were opened on January 23, 2018, and came in substantially higher than the engineer’s estimate. Staff evaluated the bids along with the company’s references and experience as a basis for recommendation. Staff is recommending that the lowest responsive bidder, Diaz Construction Group, be awarded a contract for the Base Bid and Alternates 1 and 2 in the amount of $347,392, with a contingency of $34,740, for a total of $382,132. Council Action Form – Misc Street and Drainage Improvements February 12, 2018 Page 2 PRIOR ACTION: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for this program was approved in the 2017 Capital Improvement Program budget in two different line items. Some of the budgeted funds were used to pay consultants to design the projects and to prepare the construction drawings. The Minor Street Improvement Projects line item 30-303-800-840 has an available budget of $241,396 and the Miscellaneous Drainage Improvement Projects line item 30-302-800-833 has an available budget of $183,824 for a total available budget of $425,220. BACKGROUND: The various locations included in the 2017 Miscellaneous Street and Drainage Project were assembled to combine street reconstruction and drainage improvements to take advantage of similar construction aspects. The project consists of: Union Street improvements – a project was developed to improve Union Street south of West 34th Place. Currently, Union Street is a dirt road heading south from W 34th Place that serves four residential properties. The road is approximately 320 feet in length and ends at a turn around. This project will help reduce street maintenance and improve drainage for the adjacent properties by paving the street and installing curb/gutter. At the residents’ request, the on-street parking was reduced at the south end to save several large oak trees. W 32nd Drive and Union Street Drainage improvements – Runoff from the neighborhood south and west of the intersection at W 32nd Drive and Union Street converges at this intersection. The runoff flows north along some existing curb/gutter but also overtops the trail entrance to Lewis Meadows Park, frequently washing out the trail surface at this location. This project regrades the trail entrance and replaces the curb/gutter with a drainage channel to prevent the overtopping of the trail entrance. Irrigation Culvert replacement on Miller Street at W 50th Avenue – This project replaces a badly deteriorated irrigation pipe crossing under Miller Street. An existing corrugated metal pipe that carries flow from the Bayou Ditch has deteriorated to the point where a replacement is necessary. This irrigation crossing has been in operation for many years and will be replaced with a reinforced concrete pipe for better longevity. 26th Avenue and Ames Street curb and gutter installation improvements – In 2014, the City completed a major drainage project in the southeast part of the City that had previously experienced drainage problems for many years due to the lack of a storm sewer system to capture the flows that crossed W 29th Avenue. That project discharged the captured flow onto Sheridan Boulevard and a new detention basin at the Richards-Hart Estate. That project also included installing curb/gutter along Ames Street from W 28th Avenue to the first driveway south of the Richards-Hart Estate to prevent ongoing erosion problems along the Richards-Hart Estate property. The installation of curb/gutter under this project extends the curb/gutter to W 26th Council Action Form – Misc Street and Drainage Improvements February 12, 2018 Page 3 Avenue. At the time of the original project, the property owner to the south of the Richards-Hart Estate was not interested in extending the curb/gutter due to several trees that would be impacted. Bids for the ITB-18-02 2017 Miscellaneous Street Projects were opened on January 23, 2018. Four bids were received. All bids met the initial bid requirements and all four were substantially above the engineering estimate. Staff has analyzed the bids and believe the high prices are largely due to the scattered locations, relatively small size of the individual projects, and the increasingly competitive construction market we continue to experience. After the bids were opened, staff realized that two of the quantities were wrong in bid alternates 1 and 2. The Corrected Bid Tab, Attachment 1, shows the corrected amounts for the bidders. The 2017 Miscellaneous Street Project is comprised of the following: Base Bid – Union Street, south of 34th Place, street reconstruction. Alternate 1 – 32nd Place and Union Street drainage improvement Alternate 2 – Irrigation pipe replacement at Miller Street south of 50th Avenue. Alternate 3 – Ames Street curb/gutter installation from Richard Hart Estates to 26th Avenue. Bid Ranges Engineer’s Estimate Base Bid: $242,690.00 - $285,358.00 $167,707.00 Bid Alternates: 1 $58,377.00 - $88,293.75 $41,626.00 2 $43,068.00 - $106,604.30 $20,484.00 3 $57,095.00 - $115,569.50 $32,329.00 Recognizing that the high total cost of base bid and all bid alternates exceeds the budget amount, staff recommends that the base bid and bid alternates 1 and 2 be awarded, as these are the highest priority projects. Bid alternate 3 will be included in a future drainage improvement project at W 26th and Fenton Street in 2019. The lowest responsible and responsive bidder, including the base bid and bid alternates 1 and 2, Diaz Construction, Lakewood, CO, has met the bid and qualification requirements. A contingency amount of $34,740 is requested to allow for the cost of other potential unanticipated items related to the project that can sometimes occur after the commencement of construction. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based upon the contractor's demonstrated capabilities and performance on previous projects and due to available budget, Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to Diaz Construction Group that includes the Base Bid and Bid Alternates 1 and 2 as outlined above. Staff also recommends that the Director of Public Works be authorized to issue change orders up to a total contract and contingency amount of $382,132.00. Council Action Form – Misc Street and Drainage Improvements February 12, 2018 Page 4 RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to award a contract, and approve subsequent payments, to Diaz Construction Group, Lakewood, CO, in the amount of $347,392, with a contingency amount of $34,740 for the 2017 Miscellaneous Street and Drainage Project Base Bid and Bid Alternates 1 and 2.” Or, “I move to deny the award to Diaz Construction Group, Lakewood, CO for the 2017 Miscellaneous Street and Drainage Project Base Bid and Bid Alternates 1 and 2, for the following reason(s) _________________________________________________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Mark Westberg, Projects Supervisor Jennifer Nellis, Purchasing Agent Scott Brink, Director of Public Works Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Corrected Bid Tab 2. Project Map page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 1 Subject to review for completeness and accuracy. CORRECTED Quantity error - Bid Alts 1 and 2 PROJECT: ITB-18-02 ALLOWED VENDOR (PRIME)Diaz Construction Group KECI Colorado, Inc. PLM Asphalt & Concrete, Inc Technology Constructors, Inc. LOCATION Lakewood, CO Sedalia, CO Aurora, CO Arvada, CO PROPOSAL FORM Yes Yes Yes Yes ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM (0)Yes Yes Yes Yes CONTRACTOR'S QUALIFICATION FORM Yes Yes Yes Yes NON-DISCRIMINATION ASSURANCE FORM Yes Yes Yes Yes ILLEGAL ALIEN COMPLIANCE Yes Yes Yes Yes LIST OF SUB-CONTRACTORS Yes Yes Yes Yes NON-COLLUSION AFFADAVIT Yes Yes Yes Yes BID BOND Yes Yes Yes Yes KEEP JOBS IN COLORADO Yes Yes Yes Yes PAGE 27 BASE BID Sub-Total 48,375.00$ 107,241.00$ 115,237.40$ 80,530.00$ PAGE 28 BASE BID Sub-Total 197,572.00$ 162,437.00$ 170,120.70$ 162,160.00$ TOTAL AMOUNT OF BASE BID: $ 245,947.00 $ 269,678.00 $ 285,358.10 $ 242,690.00 $ - PAGE 29-30 BID-ALT #1 TOTAL $ 75,645.00 $ 86,457.00 $ 92,107.10 $ 72,761.00 CORRECTED BID-ALT #1 TOTAL $ 58,377.00 $ 85,018.00 $ 88,293.75 $ 71,322.00 PAGE 30 BID-ALT #2 TOTAL $ 43,268.00 $ 70,385.00 $ 107,610.30 $ 50,986.00 CORRECTED BID-ALT #2 TOTAL $ 43,068.00 $ 70,135.00 $ 106,604.30 $ 50,746.00 PAGE 31 BID-ALT #3 TOTAL $ 57,095.00 $ 99,555.00 $ 115,569.50 $ 77,565.00 2017 MISC STREET PROJECTS DUE DATE/TIME: TUESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2018 BY 1 P.M. LOCAL TIME REQUESTED BY: MARK WESTBERG, PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT SUPERVISOR OPENED BY: JENNIFER NELLIS, PURCHASING AGENT WITNESSED BY: JODI BAROS Base Bid Bid Alt 1 Bid Alt 2 Bid Alt 3 Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan,Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand),MapmyIndia, NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity 3105000 3105000 3110000 3110000 3115000 3115000 3120000 3120000 3125000 312500016 9 5 0 0 0 16 9 5 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 5 0 0 0 17 0 5 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 17 1 5 0 0 0 17 1 5 0 0 0 DATE: 12/12/2008 PA T H : D : \ G I S D a t a \ G I S \ M X D s \ T e m p l a t e s \ A - s i z e . m x d State Plane Coordinate Projection Colorado Central ZoneDatum: NAD83 2017 Misc Street Projects ³ 1,300 0 1,300 2,600 Feet LEGEND City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado7500 West 29th AvenueWheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001303.234.5900 Base Bid(Union St South of W 34th Pl.)Bid Alt 1 (Union St north of W 32nd Ave)Bid Alt 2 (Miller St north of W 50th Ave)Bid Alt 3 (Ames St north of W 26th Ave) ATTACHMENT 2 ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 11-2018 – A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2017 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $122,327.90 FOR ON-CALL BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES AND RELATED COSTS PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO ______________________________ ______________________________ Community Development Director City Manager ISSUE: On May 8, 2017, the City of Wheat Ridge experienced an extremely damaging hailstorm, and as a result, the workload for the City’s building division increased exponentially for all of 2017. In 2017, the City processed approximately 7000 residential roof permits and conducted nearly 16,000 roof-related inspections. This was in addition to it being a busy year in general in processing a diverse range of residential and commercial building permits. At our peak, we had as many as 8-9 inspectors and 4-5 permit technicians working on a daily basis. The bulk of this work has been performed by our contract building inspection firm, Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. (CAA). On August 14, 2017, City Council approved Resolution 27-2017, authorizing an additional $841,330 in a budget supplemental for “on-call building inspections, plan review and other support services and related costs.” That approval was based on our estimate of expenses that would be incurred based on the volume of work that had been experienced at that time. Our actual work volume peaked in September and October and as a result, our preliminary expense estimates were slightly lower than actual costs incurred. By way of example, our cost estimate for August was $150,000 and actual costs for CAA were $163,710. For November, we had estimated a weather Council Action Form – Building Division Budget Supplemental February 12, 2018 Page 2 slowdown resulting in a $50,000 estimate for CAA. The mild weather resulted in higher than estimated inspection volume and actual costs of $110,765. Costs have also been incurred for temporary help to assist in scanning files for our permanent electronic records and for additional credit card processing fees. The year-end “Roofing Permit and Inspections Report” is attached for further reference. PRIOR ACTION: During the annual budget adoption process for 2017, City Council approved $34,000 in the budget for building division contract services. As noted, On August 14, 2017, City Council approved an initial budget supplemental of $841,330. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Building Division’s contract services account had a balance of $74,491.21 prior to paying CAA bills for November and December and credit card processing fees for December. CAA costs for November were $110,765 and for December were $82,383.75. Credit card fees for December were $3,670.36, for a grand total of $196,819.11. After expending the existing funds, an additional budget supplemental is needed in the amount of $122,327.90. Permit fees associated with residential and commercial roofs have exceeded $1,750,000. Total permit fees for 2017 exceeded $2,270,000. BACKGROUND: The City of Wheat Ridge was at the center of the damaging May 8 hailstorm. This storm is on track to be one of the costliest weather-related storm event in Colorado’s history, exceeding $1 billion in claims. Staff had initially estimated 7,000 residential re-roof permits would be issued in 2017, with an additional smaller surge potentially in 2018. At year-end, 6,662 residential roof permits had been issued, plus an additional 323 commercial roofs and 94 homeowner roof permits. To respond to the permit application and inspection volume, staff has brought on between 4 and 8 additional inspectors, between 2 and 4 additional building permit technicians, and plan reviewers as needed, through our contract inspection firm, Charles Abbott Associates. The City has continued to offer next day inspections throughout the storm and introduced an on-line roof permit application process to ease the administrative burden on our contractor customers. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the resolution in order to provide for a supplemental budget appropriation of $122,327.90 for the purpose of amending the fiscal year 2017 budget to reflect the need for additional building division staff resources to respond to the permit and inspection volume associated with the May 8 hailstorm. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Resolution No. 11-2018, a resolution amending the fiscal year 2017 General Fund budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $122,327.90 for on-call building permit inspections, plan review and other support services and related costs.” Council Action Form – Building Division Budget Supplemental February 12, 2018 Page 3 Or, “I move to table indefinitely Resolution No. 11-2018, a resolution amending the fiscal year 2017 General Fund budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $122,327.90 for on-call building permit inspections, plan review and other support services and related costs for the following reason(s) _______________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 11-2018 2. Roofing Permits and Inspections Report – 2017 Year-End CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 11 Series of 2018 TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2017 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $122,327.90 FOR ON-CALL BUILDING PERMIT INSPECTIONS, PLAN REVIEW AND OTHER SUPPORT SERVICES AND RELATED COSTS WHEREAS, the City regularly contracts with an outside firm to provide intermittent building inspections, plan review and other building division related services; and WHEREAS, Charles Abbott Associates was selected through a competitive bidding process as the top firm to provide said services through RFQ-17-09 in the spring of 2017; and WHEREAS, a hailstorm on May 8, 2017, has resulted in a significant increase in the amount of contract building permit-related services required by the City to address the associated building permit and inspection volume; and WHEREAS, said storm has also resulted in increases in credit card processing fees, temporary labor and other office supply expenses; and WHEREAS, the requested funding is available in the General Fund undesignated reserves. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado as follows: Section 1. A transfer of $122,327.90 from General Fund undesignated reserves for on-call building permit inspections, plan reviews and other support services to account 01-122-700-704 DONE AND RESOLVED this 12th day of February 2018. William “Bud” Starker, Mayor ATTEST: Janelle Shaver, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 1 Roofing Permits and Inspections - 2017 Year-end Report Resulting from hail storm on May 8, 2017 RESIDENTIAL ROOFING PERMITS PROCESSED RRF = Residential roof Date All Permits Processed RRF Permits Processed All Permits Fees All Permits Use Tax All Permits Total RRF Permit Fees RRF Permit Use Tax RRF Permit Total May 8 - May 28, 2017 (3 wks)265 211 60,791.50$ 62,519.08$ 123,310.58$ 43,701.90$ 37,189.33$ 80,891.23$ May 29 - June 11, 2017 (2 wks)717 673 158,076.00$ 169,052.75$ 327,128.75$ 144,062.30$ 144,672.33$ 288,734.63$ June 12 - June 25, 2017 (2 wks)540 452 127,207.80$ 152,697.47$ 279,905.27$ 97,639.50$ 99,443.93$ 197,083.43$ June 26 - July 9 (2 wks)976 888 230,117.77$ 258,922.61$ 489,040.38$ 198,771.67$ 203,227.30$ 401,998.97$ July 10 - July 23 (2 wks)1063 973 260,681.30$ 317,151.34$ 577,832.64$ 215,690.13$ 220,732.00$ 436,422.13$ July 24 - August 6 (2 wks)882 771 231,927.95$ 316,974.46$ 548,902.41$ 172,812.75$ 177,565.46$ 350,378.21$ August 7 - August 20 (2wks)776 654 216,285.30$ 337,503.13$ 553,788.43$ 152,426.25$ 157,706.27$ 310,132.52$ August 21 - Sept 3 (2 wks)519 413 114,472.35$ 128,698.42$ 243,170.77$ 94,596.10$ 97,211.59$ 191,807.69$ Sept 4 - Sept 18 (2 wks)413 288 96,850.80$ 112,399.52$ 209,250.32$ 68,478.50$ 70,947.14$ 139,425.64$ Sept 19 - Oct 1 (2 wks)515 359 159,761.50$ 273,079.88$ 432,841.38$ 87,866.85$ 91,415.39$ 179,282.24$ Oct 2 - Oct 15 (2 wks)388 285 86,265.00$ 99,699.87$ 185,964.87$ 64,936.74$ 67,083.10$ 132,019.84$ Oct 16 - Oct 29 (2 wks)337 219 96,906.15$ 156,144.31$ 253,050.46$ 49,469.00$ 50,490.06$ 99,959.06$ Oct 30 - Nov 12 (2 wks)280 165 68,503.90$ 91,352.22$ 159,856.12$ 36,906.30$ 37,399.32$ 74,305.62$ Nov 13 - Nov 26 (2 wks)224 137 76,648.45$ 170,859.01$ 247,507.46$ 24,637.70$ 32,107.85$ 56,745.55$ Nov 27 - Dec 10 (2 wks)211 106 82,939.75$ 179,079.05$ 262,018.80$ 32,028.00$ 32,955.00$ 64,983.00$ Dec 11 - Dec 24 (2 wks)133 61 38,899.93$ 61,454.46$ 100,354.39$ 13,405.48$ 13,115.18$ 26,520.66$ Dec 25 - Dec 31 (1 wk)29 7 7,101.10$ 12,031.73$ 19,132.83$ 1,398.40$ 1,327.87$ 2,726.27$ Totals since storm 8268 6662 2,113,436.55$ 2,899,619.31$ 5,013,055.86$ 1,498,827.57$ 1,534,589.12$ 3,033,416.69$ 2017 8764 6723 2,270,183.75$ 3,237,553.03$ 5,507,736.78$ 1,511,385.62$ 1,544,488.71$ 3,055,874.33$ 2016 1597 231 464,848.76$ 806,358.14$ 1,271,206.90$ 45,749.70$ 39,455.48$ 85,205.18$ ATTACHMENT 2 Roofing Permits and Inspections - 2017 Year-end Report Page 2 RRF PERMIT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED Including in person (May 8 to June 8) and online (June 8 to Dec 31) RRF = Residential Roofing Permit Date Weekly Total Week of May 8 5 Week of May 15 52 Week of May 22 154 Week of May 29 283 Week of June 5 681 Week of June 12 591 Week of June 19 475 Week of June 26 491 Week of July 3 301 Week of July 10 422 Week of July 17 416 Week of July 24 288 Week of July 31 329 Week of August 7 241 Week of August 14 245 Week of August 21 233 Week of August 28 185 Week of Sept 4 163 Week of Sept 11 219 Week of Sept 18 177 Week of Sept 25 176 Week of Oct 2 132 Week of Oct 9 118 Week of Oct 16 124 Week of Oct 23 102 Week of Oct 30 89 Week of Nov 6 86 Week of Nov 13 80 Week of Nov 20 48 Week of Nov 27 66 Week of Dec 4 40 Week of Dec 11 50 Week of Dec 18 12 Week of Dec 25 7 Total applications submitted 7081 2017 7142 2016 231 5 52 154 283 681 591 475 491 301 422416 288 329 241 245233 185163 219 177 176 132118124102 89 86 80 48 66 40 50 12 70 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Residential Roofing Permit Applications Submitted, by Week Roofing Permits and Inspections - 2017 Year-end Report Page 3 ROOFING INSPECTIONS COMPLETED Includes sheathing, midroof, and final inspections completed from May 8 to Dec 31 Date Roof-Related Inspections Week of May 8 19 Week of May 15 16 Week of May 22 135 Week of May 29 241 Week of June 5 339 Week of June 12 470 Week of June 19 438 Week of June 26 520 Week of July 3 449 Week of July 10 700 Week of July 17 662 Week of July 24 650 Week of July 31 735 Week of August 7 669 Week of August 14 775 Week of August 21 715 Week of August 28 660 Week of Sept 4 591 Week of Sept 11 752 Week of Sept 18 715 Week of Sept 25 458 Week of Oct 2 586 Week of Oct 9 451 Week of Oct 16 583 Week of Oct 23 479 Week of Oct 30 464 Week of Nov 6 330 Week of Nov 13 485 Week of Nov 20 181 Week of Nov 27 403 Week of Dec 4 340 Week of Dec 11 338 Week of Dec 18 194 Week of Dec 25 60 Total roofing inspections 15,603 2017 15,869 2016 1029 19 16 135 241 339 470 438 520 449 700662650 735 669 775 715 660 591 752715 458 586 451 583 479464 330 485 181 403 340338 194 60 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 Roofing Inspections Completed, by Week Roofing Permits and Inspections - 2017 Year-end Report Page 4 CONTRACT LABOR - ACTUAL AND ESTIMATED COSTS Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. (CAA) Actual and estimated invoice amounts from CAA - invoices are received monthly, estimates are based on hourly rate Date Permit Technicians Hours Billed Permit Tech Cost ($65/hr) Inspectors Hours Billed Inspector Cost ($95/hr)Total Cost Month of June - Actual 2 6 94,780.00$ Month of July - Actual 3-4 6-7 122,591.25$ Month of August - Actual 3-4 7-8 163,710.00$ Month of September - Actual 3 8-9 146,596.25$ Month of October - Actual 3 8-9 162,472.50$ Month of November - Actual 1.5 FTE 5.5 FTE 110,765.00$ Month of December - Actual 1.5 FTE 4 FTE 82,383.75$ CAA Total 883,298.75$ Kelly Services Based on weekly invoice amounts - no additional services expected in 2017 Date No. of Staff Total Cost Week of August 21 1 480.00$ Week of August 28 1 1,020.00$ Week of Sept 4 1 600.00$ Week of Sept 11 1 870.00$ Week of Sept 18 1 1,020.00$ Week of Sept 25 1 960.00$ Week of Oct 2 1 870.00$ Week of Oct 9 1 900.00$ Week of Oct 16 1 990.00$ Week of Oct 23 1 982.50$ Week of Oct 30 1 825.00$ Week of Nov 6 1 1,200.00$ Week of Nov 13 1 960.00$ Week of Nov 20 1 1,050.00$ Kelly Services Total 12,727.50$ Roofing Permits and Inspections - 2017 Year-end Report Page 5 ROOFING PERMITS BY TYPE Comparison of residential (RRF), commercial (CRF), and homeowner (HRP) roofing permits from May 8 to Dec 31. All RRF totals are from page 1 of this report. Roof Permit Type #%$%$%$% Residential (RRF)6662 94.1 1,498,827.57$ 85.5 1,534,589.12$ 76.0 3,033,416.69$ 80.4 Commercial (CRF)323 4.6 237,758.45$ 13.6 468,272.82$ 23.2 706,031.27$ 18.7 Homeowner (HRP)94 1.3 17,109.50$ 1.0 16,279.20$ 0.8 33,388.70$ 0.9 Totals 7079 100.0 1,753,695.52$ 100.0 2,019,141.14$ 100.0 3,772,836.66$ 100.0 Permits Processed Permit Fees Use Tax Total Revenue (Fees + Use Tax) ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO MAKE AN APPOINTMENT TO FILL A VACANCY ON THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS, DISTRICT II, TERM TO EXPIRE 3/02/20 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ City Clerk City Manager ISSUE: Due to the recent resignation of Lily Griego, one of the District II positions on the Board of Adjustments is vacant. The term of this position ends March 2, 2020. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: Following the resignation of Lily Griego from the Board of Adjustments, the City Clerk’s office advertised the position. Applications for the position have been received from Larry Richmond, 4455 Carr Street (a resident of District II), and Robert DeVries, 3405 Harlan Street (a resident of District I). Section. 2-53 (c) of the City Code states in part: “………All appointments to all boards and commissions shall be made to achieve equal representation from each council district to each board or commission. If, after reasonable advertisement, no applications are received from residents within the relevant council district for a vacancy on any board or commission, the council may appoint any otherwise qualified resident……… “ Larry Richmond is currently on the Board of Adjustment as an At-Large Alternate. Council Action Form – Board of Adjustments Appointment February 12, 2018 Page 2 RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to appoint _________________________________ to the Board of Adjustment for District II to fill a vacancy, term ending March 2, 2020.” or “I move to deny the appointment of __________________to the Board of Adjustment for the following reason(s) . REPORT PREPARED BY: Robin Eaton, Deputy City Clerk Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Larry Richmond 2. Application Robert DeVries ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 2 ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO APPOINT WANDA SANG AND NANCY SNOW TO THE ELECTION COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ City Clerk City Manager ISSUE: The two positions on the Election Commission are due for appointment. The positions were properly advertised. Only two applications were received. Wanda Sang and Nancy Snow currently serve on the Election Commission and both have reapplied. Both individuals meet the qualifications to serve and both have extensive knowledge and experience with elections. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. BACKGROUND: The Election Commission consists of the City Clerk and two (2) registered electors of the City. The Election Commission assists the Office of the City Clerk in election procedures and process, establishes proof of residency qualification where residency is in question, and provides the appropriate procedure to be used when an election procedure is in doubt. By Charter, Election Commission members are appointed by the City Council and serve for a term of two (2) years. RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the City Council appoint Wanda Sang and Nancy Snow to serve on the Election Commission. Council Action Form – Appointment to Election Commission February 12, 2018 Page 2 RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to appoint Wanda Sang and Nancy Snow to the Election Commission, terms to expire December 9, 2019.” or “I move to deny the appointment of Wanda Sang and Nancy Snow to the Election Commission for the following reason(s)_____________________. REPORT PREPARED BY: Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application from Wanda Sang 2. Application from Nancy Snow ATTACHMENT 1 ATTACHMENT 2 Memorandum TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Patrick Goff, City Manager Jerry Dahl, City Attorney DATE: February 8, 2018 SUBJECT: Continuance of Clear Creek Crossing Public Hearing On February 8, 2018, the City received a request from Evergreen Devco LLC (Evergreen) for a continuance of Council Bill No. 01-2018, which was originally scheduled for February 12, 2018. Section 26-109.E.1. of the Wheat Ridge City Code of Laws allows that “one (1) postponement by the applicant may be allowed by the planning commission, board of adjustments or city council. Upon the second request for postponement, the planning commission, board of adjustments or city council shall have the authority, which they may exercise at their discretion, to dismiss the application.” The City Attorney and I have conferred and it is the City’s practice to grant an applicant a continuance on an applicant’s first request. Mr. Dahl strongly requests that City Council grant this continuance. If you have any concerns please contact Mr. Dahl. Recommended Motion: “I move to postpone Council Bill No. 01-2018 – an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located on the west side of Interstate-70, between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) (Case No. WZ-16-07/Clear Creek Crossing) until March 26, 2018” Attachment: 1. Evergreen Continuance Request, dated February 8, 2018 16498840 February 8, 2018 Gerald Dahl, City Attorney Murray Dahl Keuchenmeister Renaud LLP 710 Kipling Street Suite 300 Lakewood, CO 80215 Patrick Goff, City Manager City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue 1st Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 City Council Members City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue 1st Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Request to Continue Council Bill 01-2018 (an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located on the west side of interstate-70, between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) (Case No. WZ-16-07/Clear Creek Crossing)) Ladies and Gentlemen: We represent Evergreen Devco LLC (“Evergreen”) with respect to its application, submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge (the “City”) on or around December 15, 2016 (the “Application”), for approval of an Outline Development Plan (“ODP”) Amendment for the project known as Clear Creek Crossing. Currently the public hearing to further consider the Application has been scheduled for February 12, 2018. However, we have received concerns expressed by members of the community, and therefore Evergreen requests additional time in order to investigate alternatives and address the concerns that have been raised. Specifically, the undersigned, on behalf of Evergreen, respectfully requests that the public hearing concerning the Application be continued to the regular meeting date on March 26, 2018. 2 16498840 Please let me know as soon as possible if the Council intends to grant this Request for Continuance. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP Carolynne C. White, Esq. Attorney cc: Monica Duran, District I Janeece Hoppe, District I Kristi Davis, District II Zachary Urban, District II Tim Fitzgerald, District III George Pond, District III Larry Mathews, District IV Leah Dozeman, District IV Ken Johnstone, Planning Director Case No. WZ-16-07/Clear Creek Crossing ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 01-2018 – AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF INTERSTATE-70, BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 34TH AVENUE AND CLEAR CREEK FROM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD) TO PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (PMUD) (CASE NO. WZ-16-07/CLEAR CREEK CROSSING) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (1/8/18) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (2/12/18) RESOLUTIONS Continuance requested to March 26, 2018 QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ _____________________________________ Community Development Director City Manager ISSUE: Evergreen Devco, Inc. acquired 109 acres of undeveloped property on the west side of I-70 and south of Clear Creek in December 2016 with the intent of developing a mixed-use commercial and residential development. Evergreen has applied for a rezoning of this property from the current Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to a Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) designation. In contrast to the previous zoning on the property, which was focused on retail uses, the intent is to create a development with a much broader mix of residential, employment, retail, hotels, restaurants and entertainment. The applicant is requesting approval of an Outline Development Plan (ODP), supported by a Vision Book that establishes the intended design and architectural themes and materials, as well as a Design Pattern Book that includes the more substantive development regulations. Council Action Form – Clear Creek Crossing February 12, 2018 Page 2 PRIOR ACTION: This zone change request was heard by the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on January 18, 2018. The Planning Commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of this project with two conditions: 1. There be an addition of maximum residential height of 65 feet in Planning Area 1. 2. At least 50% of the proposed total square footage at the ground floor level shall contain nonresidential uses across all Planning Areas. The Planning Commission staff report, draft minutes of the meetings are provided as attachments. Prior to this application, the property was annexed into the City in 2005, and two different Planned Commercial Development proposals were approved by the City in 2006 and 2011. The City has worked with the Colorado Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration on an Environment Assessment (EA) to determine the improvements necessary to the surrounding local street network and adjacent Interstate-70. The first EA was completed in 2006, with the City initiating an update to this document in 2014 to propose a phased approach to development of the site and infrastructure. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Fees in the amount of $27,175 were collected for the processing of Case No. WZ-16-07. If this zone change request is approved, the subsequent development will support the City’s economic development goals. It is anticipated the City will enter into a public/private joint development agreement with the developer, Evergreen Devco, to fund portions of the necessary public infrastructure over a period of time through a share back of a portion of City tax revenues that are generated from this site. The terms have not been negotiated, and will not be initiated until a zoning document is approved. BACKGROUND: Existing Conditions The property is undeveloped, with the exception of a portion of the local road network having been built (40th Avenue underpass and short extension). There is an active grading and fill permit that authorizes the import of fill material and overlot grading. Denver Water is under construction for a new 80-inch water line, which replaces two existing water lines that traverse the property and have existed for many years. Surrounding Land Uses Properties to the west are located in unincorporated Jefferson County, and are generally water storage facilities for Coors and the Applewood Golf Course. Clear Creek is located to the north, along with additional vacant properties owned by Coors and zoned for low intensity office/industrial uses as part of the original Coors/Cabela’s ODP. Properties directly to the south are generally highway oriented commercial uses, including a gas station, hotel and restaurants, all part of the 70 West Business Center Planned Commercial Development. Properties adjacent to the southwest include larger lot single-family homes located in unincorporated Jefferson County. Council Action Form – Clear Creek Crossing February 12, 2018 Page 3 Across I-70 to the east is the Applewood Village shopping center with various retail/restaurant uses. Zone Change Request The applicant is requesting approval of an Outline Development Plan (ODP), supported by a Vision Book that establishes the intended design and architectural themes and materials, as well as a Design Pattern Book that includes the more substantive development regulations. Much like the previous zoning document for the project, the current Outline Development Plan divides the 109-acre site into Planning Areas (PAs) and creates a slightly different list of permitted uses in each of those PAs. The application seeks to ensure a fair amount of flexibility in the land use mix, as the developer is negotiating with numerous potential end users and tenants. Further, based on the highway adjacent location, a wide variety of land uses may be appropriate in each of the planning areas and help to achieve the vision of a dynamic mixed-use development concept. Following is a brief summary of the new land use concept by Planning Area. Refer to the Planning Commission staff report for a more detailed discussion of the proposed zoning and an analysis of the zone change criteria. PA-1 – 25.43 acres – Located east of Clear Creek Drive and immediately adjacent to I-70 and therefore appropriate for a large variety of commercial retail, office, multi-family, entertainment and employment uses including hospitals, and research and development. The developer is negotiating with a potential major employer to anchor this planning area and provide a daytime population that would benefit the retail and restaurant components of the project. PA-2 – 13.84 acres – This area is also east of Clear Creek Drive, but further removed from I-70. It could have strong potential for multi-family, with the adjacency to Clear Creek and the associated greenbelt and the potential for attractive west facing views. It also has commercial potential and it too has a great deal of flexibility in uses, not knowing specifically how the development program for the project will evolve over time. PA-3 – 11.04 acres – This area is adjacent to I-70, Clear Creek Drive and 40th Avenue, offering prime commercial retail, restaurant, and entertainment potential. Residential uses and more automobile-oriented uses are not allowed in this planning area. It is the intent in this planning area to achieve a high degree of walkability and high quality urban design and architecture at the heart of the project. PA-4 – 6.10 acres in total – This area is adjacent on either side of the new on and off ramps from I-70, as such a greater amount of auto oriented uses are allowed, including car washes and restaurant drive-throughs and motor vehicle fueling. Residential uses are not allowed in this more auto-oriented district. Council Action Form – Clear Creek Crossing February 12, 2018 Page 4 PA-5 – 4.19 acres – This area borders existing single-family residential to the southwest, and as such, intensive uses such as light industrial are not allowed. With proximity to the I-70 ramps, this district is appropriate for commercial uses, including some auto-oriented uses. PA-6 – 18.75 acres – This area was previously planned as the Walmart site and is a large site that can accommodate larger format users, including possibly larger retail users and possibly larger entertainment uses. However, with its western views and adjacency to water it could also have potential for multi-family uses, particularly if PA-2 does not become a multi-family site. PA-7 – 3.43 acres – This is a small planning area located at a signalized intersection along Clear Creek Drive, so likely has good potential for smaller format retail, restaurant, office, etc. PA-8 – 11.72 acres – This area straddles Clear Creek and was previously acquired from Jefferson County after Foothills (Table Mountain) Animal Shelter was decommissioned and moved. A large portion of PA-8 is in the floodplain and this district will function as privately owned/maintained open space. Review Process Approval of this ODP is the first step in a Planned Development process. The ODP approves permitted uses, access configuration for cars, bikes and pedestrians. The Vision Book establishes the architectural design themes, and the Design Pattern Book establishes all of the development regulations for site planning, landscaping, architectural details, etc. These regulatory documents will be used during the Planning Commission’s subsequent review of Specific Development Plans for each phase of the project. These regulatory documents will also be utilized by an Architectural Control Committee proposed to be created by the developer, which will perform schematic design review prior to SDP application submittal to ensure that projects are achieving high quality design and site configuration that in conformance with the regulatory documents from the outset. The applicant will also be submitting a revised subdivision plat for the development, which will be reviewed and approved by both the Planning Commission and City Council. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Council Bill No. 01-2018 an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located on the west side of Interstate-70 between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek from Planned Commercial Development to Planned Mixed Use Development with an Outline Development Plan, Design Pattern Book, and Vision book on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which calls for a Regional Commercial Center on the site. 3. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of adoption of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, namely a more Council Action Form – Clear Creek Crossing February 12, 2018 Page 5 diverse mix of uses, which responds to market demands, mitigates transportation impacts, and yields a more robust development. 4. The proposed zoning includes a circulation network that supports the City’s goals related to bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, 5. The proposed zoning establishes enhanced design controls related to site design, building design, materials, and landscaping that will result in a high-quality development. 6. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request.” With the following conditions: 1. There be an addition of maximum residential height of 65 feet in PA 1. 2. At least 50% of the proposed total square footage at the ground floor level shall contain nonresidential uses across all Planning Areas, and 3. ______.” Or, “I move to deny Council Bill No. 01-2018 an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located on the west side of Interstate-70 between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek from Planned Commercial Development to Planned Mixed Use Development with an Outline Development Plan, Design Pattern Book, and Vision book on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Zack Wallace Mendez, Planner II Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill No. 01-2018 2. Planning Commission Staff Report 3. Planning Commission draft meeting minutes CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER FITZGERALD COUNCIL BILL NO. 01 ORDINANCE NO. _________ Series of 2018 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF INTERSTATE-70, BETWEEN APPROXIMATELY 34TH AVENUE AND CLEAR CREEK FROM PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD) TO PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPENT (PMUD) (CASE NO. WZ-16-07 / CLEAR CREEK CROSSING) WHEREAS, Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws establishes procedures for the City’s review and approval of requests for land use cases; and, WHEREAS, Evergreen Devco, Inc. has submitted a land use application for approval of a zone change to the Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) zone district with an Outline Development Plan (ODP), Design Pattern Book, and Vision Book for property located west of Interstate-70, between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a comprehensive plan— Envision Wheat Ridge—which calls for a Regional Commercial Center west of Interstate 70 and south of Clear Creek; and, WHEREAS, the proposed planned development will permit a well-designed, innovative development with greater control and specificity of intended development character, use, operations, and maintenance that is not feasible under a standard zone district; and WHEREAS, the proposed planned development will further promote the public health, safety and general welfare by permitting greater flexibility and innovation in land development based upon this comprehensive, integrated plan. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Upon application by Evergreen Devco, Inc. for approval of a zone change ordinance from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP), Design Pattern Book, and Vision Book for property located west of Interstate-70, between approximately 34th Avenue and Clear Creek , and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change is approved for the following described land: ATTACHMENT 1 LOTS 1, 2 AND 3, BLOCK 1; LOT 1, BLOCK 2; LOT 1, BLOCK 3; LOT 1, BLOCK 4; THAT PORTION OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5 AS CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 2004 UNDER RECEPTION NO. F2149072; LOTS 3 THROUGH 6, BLOCK 5; AND TRACTS A, B, C AND D; CLEAR CREEK CROSSING SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability; Conflicting Ordinance Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of the ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 7 to 1 on this 8th day of January, 2018, ordered it published with Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for Monday, February 12, 2018 at 7:00 o’clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of _____ to _____, this _____ day of ___________, 2018. SIGNED by the Mayor on this _______ day of _______________, 2018. ______________________________________ Bud Starker, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk Approved as to Form _______________________________________ Gerald Dahl, City Attorney 1st publication: January 11, 2018 2nd publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript: Effective Date: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Zack Wallace Mendez and Kenneth Johnstone DATE OF MEETING: January 18, 2018 CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) LOCATION OF REQUEST: West of I-70 between Clear Creek and 34th Ave (approximately) PROPERTY OWNER: Evergreen Clear Creek Crossing LLC and Broken Arrow 3 LLC APPROXIMATE AREA: Approximately 109 acres PRESENT ZONING: Planned Commercial Development (PCD) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed-Use Commercial, Regional Commercial Center ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS ZONING ORDINANCE DIGITAL PRESENTATION VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 2 All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST Case No. WZ-16-07 is an application for approval of a zone change from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP), supported by a Vision Book that establishes the intended design and architectural themes and materials, as well as a Design Pattern Book that includes the more substantive development regulations. The purpose of the request is to permit the development of a 109-acre mixed-use development west of Interstate 70, south of Clear Creek, and north of 34th Avenue (approximately) (Exhibit 4, Applicant Letter). Rezoning to a planned development in the City of Wheat Ridge involves a two-step process. The first step is the Outline Development Plan, which, if approved, changes the zoning designation on the land, establishes allowed uses and development standards for the property, and establishes access configurations for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles. The second step in the process is the Specific Development Plan (SDP), which focuses on specific details of a development such as final drainage, architecture, lot layouts, and specific building location and orientation. The SDP must be found to be compliant with the ODP in order to be approved. For this development, if the ODP is approved, there are likely to be numerous SDP applications for the different phases or “Planning Areas” identified by the applicant (Exhibit 7, Outline Development Plan). The applicant is requesting a two-step approval, which is permitted pursuant to Section 26-302 of the Municipal Code. The ODP document requires public hearings before the Planning Commission and the City Council, with the City Council being the final deciding body. If the ODP is approved, the applicant can apply for SDP approval(s). Each application must be heard at a public hearing before the Planning Commission, who is the final deciding body for SDP approval. A subdivision plat will also be required with this development. The applicant recently submitted the subdivision plat application for its first review at the end of December, and it is currently being reviewed by Staff and referral agencies. The plat will be reviewed by Planning Commission and City Council. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY Annexation/Zoning Approximately 178 acres of land was annexed in 2005 west of I-70 and south of Highway 58 (Exhibit 3, Annexation History Map). The annexation was known as the Coors/Cabela’s annexation and Cabela’s subsequently purchased portions of the Coors properties with the intent of building a new retail store. City Council approved a rezoning of the properties to Planned Commercial Development with approval of an ODP in 2006 and a Final Development Plan for an 185,000 square foot store in August 2006. Many things changed in the corporate structure of Cabela’s shortly after those approvals. Notably, Cabela’s became a publicly traded company and their Board of Directors made a decision that they would no longer “self-develop” their properties/stores but would rather seek a developer partner. Not long after, the economy entered the Great Recession. In 2011, an additional 33 acres (approximately) of land along Clear Creek west of I-70 was annexed (Exhibit 3, Annexation History Map). The Cabela’s property was rezoned a second time, to accommodate a somewhat smaller Cabela’s store as well as a 177,000 square foot Walmart. In all, Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 3 nearly 1,000,000 square feet of retail/office was proposed in that rezoning, which was an aggressive amount of commercial space to get fully filled. In 2012, Cabela’s made the corporate decision to locate two stores in Colorado along the I-25 corridor at the north and south ends of the Denver metropolitan area, both of which opened in 2013. Until recently, Walmart continued to be a part of the proposed Clear Creek Crossing project, seeking to locate a Super Walmart in this location, which was part of the 2011 approval. In the summer of 2017, Walmart made the decision not to build in this location. Environmental Assessment for Road Improvements When the property was going through the annexation and rezoning process in 2005/2006, there was a parallel process being coordinated through the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to determine what improvements would be needed to the adjacent street and highway network to serve the 100-acre site. At that time, the final state- and federally-approved Environmental Assessment (EA) required the construction of the following improvements: • New underpass at 40th (complete) – (Exhibit 5, Site Photos) • Widening 32nd near Youngfield and I-70 (complete) – (Exhibit 5, Site Photos) • New on/off ramps from I-70 into the project (under design, funded through 2E bond) • Construction of Clear Creek Drive from 32nd, north through the project, over Clear Creek and up to SH58 • Construction of an entirely new interchange at SH58 and Clear Creek Drive The original EA required that all of these infrastructure upgrades be fully completed prior to any certificates of occupancy being approved for any portion of the Clear Creek Crossing development. This is an expensive list of public infrastructure projects to design and build, and the scope of these costs has always been a challenging aspect of getting the Clear Creek Crossing project completed. For that reason, in 2014, the City initiated an update to the Environmental Assessment (EA) to determine whether the construction of road infrastructure could be phased, and thus reduce the initial cost for the project. The City hired a transportation consultant to determine whether the requirement to build Clear Creek Drive over the creek and up to SH58, including a new interchange, could become a second phase that gets built when properties north of the creek develop in the future. Alongside a traffic consultant, the City has been working with CDOT and FHWA through that analysis. Phasing the project does appear to be a feasible alternative to constructing all of the originally required EA improvements at this time. Staff anticipates approval of an update to the EA in early 2018 to reflect this phased approach. The first phase includes the proposed rezoning before you today, which involves development located only south of Clear Creek. This will allow Clear Creek Drive to end prior to crossing Clear Creek as a first phase, and a new interchange at SH58 will not be required at this time. It is important to note that the new mix of uses proposed as part of this PMUD application, including employment, multi-family, retail and entertainment often have varied peak hours of activity, helping to spread the traffic out over the course of a day, reducing congestion at certain intersections and helping to make the phasing of required improvements possible. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 4 Existing Conditions/Site Constraints The subject property of today’s rezoning application consists of a portion of the 2005 annexed property and all of the 2011 annexed property (Exhibit 3, Annexation History Map). This property is undeveloped, with the exception of a portion of the local road network having been built (40th Avenue underpass and short extension) (Exhibit 1, Aerial Photo). The subject property was previously used as a gravel mine, and Coors at one point anticipated using the property for additional water storage facilities. Based on physical aspects of the site, the project includes significant site development costs relative to grading, the import of significant amounts of fill materials, and the construction of a regional stormwater detention facility. There is an active grading and fill permit that authorizes the import of fill material and overlot grading. The site features steep slopes, especially near Clear Creek, Interstate 70, and upon entering the site from the south (See Page 12 of the Design Pattern book, Exhibit 8) Denver Water is actively under construction for a new 80-inch water line, which replaces two existing water lines that traverse the property and have existed for many decades. This will result in a substantial easement across the property and dictates the alignment of some roads and buildings in the site. This multi-year Denver Water project includes boring under I-70 and the Applewood Shopping Center and terminates at the Moffat Treatment Center off of 20th Avenue in Lakewood. Page 12 of the Design Pattern Book (Exhibit 8) shows the alignment of the Denver Water easement on the site. Surrounding Land Uses and Zoning Properties to the west are generally water storage facilities for Coors and the Applewood Golf Course, some are located within the City of Wheat Ridge and zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) with very limited uses while others further west are located in unincorporated Jefferson County. Clear Creek is located to the north, along with additional vacant properties owned by Coors and zoned PCD for low intensity office/industrial uses as part of the original Coors/Cabela’s ODP. Properties directly to the south are generally highway oriented commercial uses, including a gas station, hotel and restaurants, all zoned PCD per the 70 West Business Center development plans and amendments. Properties adjacent to the southwest include larger lot single- family homes located in unincorporated Jefferson County. Across I-70 to the east is the Applewood Village shopping center with various retail/restaurant uses (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). III. PROPOSED ZONING Much has happened since this property was first approved for a development project in 2006. The country and region have endured the Great Recession and much has changed in the world of retail commercial development. Similar to the previous zoning document for the project, the proposed Outline Development Plan divides the 109-acre site into multiple Planning Areas (PAs) but the proposed PMUD creates a slightly different list of permitted uses and development standards in each of those PAs. The application seeks to ensure a fair amount of flexibility in the land use mix, as the developer is negotiating with numerous potential end users and tenants. Further, based on the highway-adjacent Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 5 location, a wide variety of land uses may be appropriate in each of the planning areas and help to achieve the vision of a dynamic mixed-use development concept. As noted previously, this application is comprised of three central components: the Outline Development Plan, the Vision Book, and the Design Pattern Book. While it is rare for a project in Wheat Ridge to include these two supplementary books, it is not uncommon for a development of this size to utilize these more graphic-heavy documents. The Design Pattern Book is akin to the City’s own Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM), the formatting of which lends itself to more photographs and graphics to explain required development standards. The content and purpose of each of these documents is noted below: • Outline Development Plan: This four-page document will be recorded with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder and is the document that officially changes the zoning on the property from PCD to PMUD. The first sheet includes standard declarations, signature blocks, the legal description, and a statement on the character of the development. The second sheet includes a general graphic layout of the Planning Areas and proposed circulation concepts, which is a required component of an ODP. The third and fourth pages establish the land uses for each Planning Area, which are permitted uses, special uses, and not permitted uses. • Vision Book: The Vision Book expands upon the statement of the development’s character. It was developed in the early stages of planning by the applicant, and while it is not a regulatory document (eg it lacks details regarding specific quantitative development standards) it is helpful in establishing the overall design intent and will certainly be used as a point of reference during the SDP review process and by the Design Review Committee (explained further later in this report). The Vision Book establishes five themed districts (mill, vineyard, harvest, homestead, and wagon) which reflect the mix of functions and uses proposed for the site. • Design Pattern Book: This nearly 100-page document is a regulatory document and includes the design standards for the site as a whole and each planning area. Similar to the City’s ASDM, it is organized into different chapters addressing site design, building design, building materials, landscape design, lighting, and signage. Where standards differ by Planning Area, they are differentiated in this book. The Design Pattern Book also references the themed districts established by the Vision Book. Again, similar to the ASDM, the pattern book includes design standards and guidelines, and it is against this document that future development and SDP applications will be assessed for compliance. Architectural Control Committee An Architectural Design Committee (ACC) will be established to ensure compliance with the Design Pattern Book, and conduct schematic design review prior to the City’s planning review. The City has not seen this review model utilized on other developments, but is not uncommon for a development of this size. This will help to facilitate a clear, consistent, and predictable process for development within the project. The ACC will be comprised of 6 members: 3 appointed by mutual agreement between the Developer and the City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Director, 2 seats held by the Developer, and 1 seat held by a City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division staff member. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 6 Prior to submittal of a Specific Development Plan (SDP) application to the City, the ACC will review an applicant’s schematic designs and provide comments to the City regarding the design and its compliance with the Design Pattern Book. An applicant would then submit a SDP application to the City. The City will refer the SDP application to the ACC to ensure consistency with the approved schematic design, and to garner any additional comments on the SDP. As previously noted, the Planning Commission is the final authority for approval of a SDP. Planning Areas Following is a brief summary of the proposed development by Planning Area. Permitted uses for each Planning Area are identified on sheets 3 and 4 of the ODP, and development standards are included in the Design Pattern Book as noted below. PA-1 – This area is east of Clear Creek Drive and immediately adjacent to I-70 and therefore appropriate for a large variety of commercial retail, office, entertainment and employment uses. Multi-family residential would also be allowed, as would various employment based uses, notably offices, hospitals and research and development. The developer is negotiating with a potential major employer to anchor this planning area and provide a daytime population that would benefit the retail and restaurant components of the project. Refer to pages 24-27 of the Design Pattern Book (Exhibit 8) for Planning Area 1 site development standards. PA-2 – This area is also east of Clear Creek Drive, but further removed from I-70. It could have strong potential for multi-family, with the adjacency to Clear Creek and the potential for attractive west-facing views. It also has commercial potential and it too has a great deal of flexibility in uses, not knowing specifically how the development program for the project will evolve over time. Refer to pages 28-31 of the Design Pattern Book for Planning Area 2 site development standards. PA-3 This area is adjacent to I-70, Clear Creek Drive and 40th Avenue, offering prime commercial retail, restaurant, and entertainment potential. As a result, residential uses are excluded from this planning area. Motor fueling stations are not allowed in this planning area, as is also the case in PA-1 and PA-2. It is the intent in this planning area to achieve a high degree of walkability and high-quality urban design and architecture at the heart of the project. Refer to pages 32-35 of the Design Pattern Book for Planning Areas 3 and 4 site development standards. PA-4 – This area is adjacent on either side of the new on and off ramps from I-70, and as such a greater amount of auto-oriented uses are allowed, including car washes, restaurant drive-throughs, and motor vehicle fueling stations. Residential uses are not allowed in this more auto-oriented district. Refer to pages 32-35 of the Design Pattern Book for Planning Areas 3 and 4 site development standards. PA-5 – This area is adjacent to PA-6 to the north, a vacant commercial lot to the south, and a portion of an existing single-family residential neighborhood further to the southwest. The physical grade of the property in this planning area is such that it sits somewhat below those adjacent properties. Multi- family is allowed, but more intensive uses such as light industrial are not allowed. With proximity to the I-70 ramps, this district is appropriate for commercial uses, including some auto-oriented uses. A 20-foot landscaped setback is required as a buffer between this development site and adjacent single- Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 7 family neighborhood. Refer to pages 36-37 of the Design Pattern Book for Planning Areas 5, 6, and 7 site development standards. PA-6 – This area was previously planned as the Walmart site and is a large site that can accommodate larger format users, including possibly larger retail users and possibly larger entertainment uses. However, with its western views and adjacency to water it could also have potential for multi-family uses, particularly if PA-2 does not become a multi-family site. A 20-foot landscaped setback is required as a buffer between this development site and adjacent single-family neighborhood. Refer to pages 36-37 of the Design Pattern Book for Planning Areas 5, 6, and 7 site development standards. PA-7 – This is a small planning area located at a signalized intersection along Clear Creek Drive, so likely has good potential for smaller format retail, restaurant, office, etc. Refer to pages 36-37 of the Design Pattern Book for Planning Areas 5, 6, and 7 site development standards. PA-8 – This area straddles Clear Creek and was previously acquired from Jefferson County after Foothills (Table Mountain) Animal Shelter was decommissioned and moved. A large portion of PA- 8 is in the floodplain and this district will function as privately owned/maintained open space. Refer to pages 38-39 of the Design Pattern Book for Planning Area 8 site development standards. Key differences between the approved 2011 PCD and the proposed PMUD can be found on the following page: 2011 Approval Current Proposal Larger development area including the areas north of Clear Creek, including Clear Creek Drive extending north of the Creek and connecting a new interchange with Highway 58. The development area is limited to areas south of Clear Creek, limiting the need for public improvements along Highway 58 and north of the Creek. PA 8 extends North of the Creek but is restricted to open space and park uses. Development centered around Super Walmart and Cablea’s with a very suburban development pattern featuring large setbacks filled with parking. Development not centered around one or two particular tenants. Development pattern is a mix of suburban and urban, with a strong emphasis on placemaking. Build-to requirements are present in many of the Planning Areas (PAs) Permitted uses were almost exclusively retail and commercial. Mix of permitted uses, including residential, retail, office, employment, hospitality, and entertainment. Maximum building height reflective of retail entitlement, ranging from 35’ – 50’ depending on the lot. Maximum building height reflective of mixed-use proposal, ranging from 50’ – 90’ depending on the Planning Area and use. Sign Package Both the proposed and previously approved sign packages include allowances for Landmark ID signage for development visibility along the Interstate, project ID signage for development identification upon entering the site, primary monument signage which identifies multiple tenants, and major tenant ID signage which identifes one primary business. Both sign packages allow for tenant wall signage at approximately 1 square foot per linear eligible frontage. Additionally, the previous approval and proposed package allow a total of 26 freestanding signs related to tenants. The proposed sign package includes four additional sign types: • Other tenant signs – similar to major tenant ID signs, but provide more flexibility in terms of design (more user oriented), but still must be associated with the Clear Creek Crossing brand. Secondary monuments will be encouaged in leiu of multiple ‘other tenant’ signs. • Secondary monument – simiar to primary monument but shorter, small sign area, meant for smaller tenants than the primary monument advertises. • Interpretative/trailhead – related to the Clear Creek trailheads and trails through the site. • Wayfinding signage – directional signage within the development. Circulation Concepts Among the purposes of an Outline Development plan is to establish general circulation concepts, and these are reflected in both the ODP and Design Pattern Book. As shown in the graphic on the previous page, the primary street grid is similar to the previous design with Clear Creek Drive bisecting the site on a diagonal and W. 40th Avenue connecting to I-70. Page 2 of the ODP and page 41 of the Design Pattern Book (Exhibit 8) show conceptual locations for the secondary street network which includes a series of signalized and full movement intersections as well as internal loop road. Both public and private streets will include upgraded streetscape standards including detached sidewalks and tree lawns. Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity is critical in a site of this size and with proximity to the Clear Creek Trail. Page 49 of the Design Pattern Book (Exhibit 8) demonstrates the pedestrian connectivity to and through the site. In addition to the standard 6-foot detached sidewalk, a multi-use trail will be created on the west side of the site adjacent to the Coors Pond connecting existing and proposed Prospect Recreation and Park District facilities and trails to Clear Creek. The multi-use trail will have a portion that runs along Clear Creek Drive. This area will include a 10-foot wide sidewalk and connect directly with the Clear Creek Trail. A secondary trail will be established on the east side of the property adjacent to I-70. Currently the Youngfield Service Road provides access to a parking lot and trailhead, this access will remain, though in a different form than what is currently found at the site. Finally, in Planning Area 3, a public gathering space will be established. IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-112.E. The Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 10 The change of zone will promote the health, safety and general welfare of the community by providing multi-use trails (Page 49 of Exhibit 8, Design Pattern Book) into and through the site and by formally connecting the Clear Creek Trail, the development site, and existing residential neighborhoods. The proposed PMUD zoning will add value to the property and surrounding community by enabling a more robust, economically sustainable, and vibrant regional center. The ODP, Vision Book, and specifically the Design Pattern Book, working in tandem with the Design Review Committee, establish enhanced design controls, which should benefit the community. The Wheat Ridge Police Department and West Metro Fire Protection District have received copies of these proposed development plans and have not noted any safety concerns. Adverse effects to surrounding neighborhoods are mitigated by buffering. The proposed Planning Areas nearest the existing low-density residential neighborhoods will be buffered by a minimum 20’ wide landscaped setback. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. This parcel is undeveloped, and has sat vacant for many years. Previously it served as a gravel mine, and was at one time anticipated to be a water storage site for Coors. As such, there is currently a lack of infrastructure serving the site. The Youngfield Service Road and 40th Avenue underpass currently allow access to the perimeter of the site, but access to the interior portions of the site is non-existent. The same situation holds true for water and sanitary service to the site, as well as telecommunications, gas, and electricity. As was previously noted, one of the chief obstacles in developing this site has been paying for the vast amount of new road infrastructure that is required. Reevaluation of the EA by the City, CDOT, and FHWA determined that the proposed development is possible without extending Clear Creek Crossing Drive across Clear Creek and without constructing a new interchange along State Highway 58. This determination was based on the mixed use nature of the proposed development. Employment, multi-family, retail and entertainment uses, have different peak hours of activity, helping to disperse the traffic throughout the course of the day and reduce congestion at certain intersections. That said the developer, will still be responsible for significant infrastructure investments to serve the development. In 2006, the City executed a redevelopment agreement with the developer at the time to formalize a public private partnership to fund the public infrastructure. In 2011, terms of an agreement could not be reached with the Cabela’s developers. It is anticipated that the City will enter into a joint development agreement with the new developer, Evergreen Devco, to fund portions of the necessary public infrastructure over a period of time through a share back of a portion of the City tax revenues that are generated from this project. The terms of that agreement Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 11 have not yet been negotiated with the Urban Renewal Authority or City Council, pending first the approval of these zoning documents. In 2016 voters approved Ballot Measure 2E, which funded several projects across the City. One key project included in the bond was the construction of new on- and off-ramps from Interstate 70 into the Clear Creek Crossing site. The developer is aware that beyond roadway improvements, there is also a need for water, sanitary sewer, and other utility services to the site as well as significant drainage and storm sewer infrastructure. The specific phasing of infrastructure installment will be established in the future by a subdivision improvement agreement with requirements for adequate infrastructure prior to Certificates of Occupancy and with consideration for the EA approval and emergency response requirements. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 3. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one (1) of the following conditions exists: a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. The proposed PMUD zoning is consistent with the City’s adopted plans, which have long called for a mixed used regional development on the site. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as “mixed-use commercial” with a “regional commercial center.” The Comprehensive Plan specifically calls out the “Crossing at Clear Creek” site in the Mixed-Use Commerical area designation: The future Crossing at Clear Creek development area (also designated as a Regional Retail Center) will develop with a mix of uses including large anchor retail, smaller complementary retail, and additional secondary uses (including employment) (Page 22). The Regional Commercial Center designation is a designation that is not found anywhere else in the City other than the Clear Creek Crossing site, and states: A 100-acre+ commercial center is located at the I-70 interchange and will serve a 5- mile+ trade area. The center will feature several anchor stores and other retail tenants, in addition to secondary uses such as employment, restaurants, or a hotel. Buildings could be higher intensity (possibly 5 or more stories) than other parts of the community east and south of I-70, so long as they are designed with landscaping, high quality urban design and architecture, preserve significant views to the extent possible, and incorporate green space (Page 29). The Comprehensive Plan was adopted in October 2009, and the designations for the subject property were very clearly influenced by the Cabela’s development plans approved in the 2005/2006 timeframe, which called for Cabela’s to be the main anchor tenant with secondary Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 12 retail and restaurants to be located on the site. Even the 2011 approvals were in line with this 2009 vision, and called for a large Cabela’s store, Super Walmart, and several smaller tenants. Additionally, the northeast portion of the subject property is designated as “Parks and Open Space.” This portion is entirely encompassed by Planning Area 8, which permits only parks and open space. While the proposed development falls in line with much of the Comprehensive Plan designations, there are a few elements that were not contemplated in 2009 that are proposed for the Clear Creek Crossing site: multi-family housing, a mix of smaller junior box restaurants, smaller retailers, office-type employment, and entertainment uses potentially serving as anchors (as opposed to a Super Walmart or Cabelas). See subsection c below. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is in error. Staff has not found any evidence of an error with the current Planned Commercial Development (PCD) zoning designation as it appears on the City zoning maps. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing character of the area. Since the first development plans were approved in 2006, and the subsequent adoption of the Comprehensive Plan in 2009, the region and country have endured the Great Recession, and the world of retail commercial development has changed dramatically. Additionally, the housing market is currently experiencing a lack of supply, and the contemporary expectation of regional developments is that they accommodate a desire to “live, work, and play.” The current development plan differs slightly from the Comprehensive Plan designation, with the inclusion of a residential component and smaller tenants anchoring the site (rather than Walmart and Cabela’s). These components are indicative of changes in the retail market, as well as changes in housing demand, employment locations, and smaller (though still regionally significant) retailers in the Denver metropolitan area marketplace. The Comprehensive Plan is nearly 10 years old, and it is in the public interest to approve a zone change that responds to these changes and delivers a contemporary incarnation of a “regional commercial center.” Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 13 d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan. Subsection c above also addresses this criterion. The need for a wider diversity of residential, employment, and retail spaces was likely not anticipated at the time the Comprehensive Plan was adopted. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request. V. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Prior to submittal of an application for a zone change, the applicant is required to hold a neighborhood input meeting in accordance with the requirements of section 26-109. A meeting for neighborhood input was held on December 6, 2016. Approximately 60 residents and property owners from the neighborhood attended the meeting. General questions were asked about the potential tenants, 2E funds, on- and off- ramps at Highway 58, and general concerns over the amount of children who will attend local schools and the amount of traffic that could be generated impacting 32nd Avenue. A complete summary of the meeting is included in Exhibit 6, Neighborhood Meeting Notes. VI. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and regarding the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow: Applewood Sanitation District: In January 2017, the district responded that the site could be served contingent upon review and approval of associated district forms, construction plans and a utility report. During a second referral in May 2017, the District expressed the need for the applicant to provide a Funding Agreement and/or Agreement for Extension of Sanitary Sewer Mains. The applicant has been working through designs with Applewood Sanitation and Consolidated Mutual in the months since, and is making forward progress. Century Link: No comments or objections. Jefferson County Planning: Provided list of 46 comments on the development plan, many of which ensured thoughtful consideration of the residential neighborhoods to the southwest of the development site, which are located in unincorporated Jefferson County. Comments were addressed in subsequent ODP reviews. Urban Drainage: Wishes to incorporate Clear Creek as a true amenity to the development and City, and would like to be part of helping shape improvements along the creek front. Also noted there is floodplain on the site. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 14 Jeffco Schools: Provided standard comment letter indicating local schools and the potential number of students the project would yield. Jeffco Public Health: Provided standard comments on air quality, environmental site assessment, types of uses that are regulated by the County health department, active living, noise, and radon. West Metro Fire Protection District: No comments or concerns. Xcel Energy: No concerns, but asked for utility easements to be placed on the subdivision plat (which is currently being reviewed and is out on referral through January 19). VII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the proposed zone change promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. Staff further concludes that the public infrastructure and utilities will adequately serve the property. Finally, Staff concludes that the zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan by promoting a mix of uses along a neighborhood commercial corridor, and also responds to changing conditions that were not considered by the 2009 Comprehensive Plan. Because the zone change evaluation criteria support the zone change request, staff recommends approval of Case No. WZ-16-07. VIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS Option A: “I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-16-07, a request for approval of a zone change from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) for property located west of Interstate 70 between Clear Creek and 34th Avenue, approximately, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which calls for a Regional Commercial Center on the site. 3. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of adoption of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, namely a more diverse mix of uses which responds to market demands, mitigates transportation impacts, and yields a more robust development. 4. The proposed zoning includes a circulation network that supports the City’s goals related to bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, 5. The proposed zoning establishes enhanced design controls related to site design, building design, materials, and landscaping that will result in a high-quality development. 6. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request.” Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 15 Option B: “I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-16-07, a request for approval of a zone change from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) for property located west of Interstate 70 between Clear Creek and 34th Avenue, approximately, for the following reasons: 1. 2. …” Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 16 EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 17 EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 18 EXHIBIT 3: ANNEXATION HISTORY MAP Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 19 [see next page] EXHIBIT 4: APPLICANT LETTER Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 21 Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 22 EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS View of the property looking north from the bend in Youngfield Service Road north of 32nd Avenue. The future Clear Creek Crossing will be located here and enter the development to the north. The existing Ramada can be seen to the left. Looking south along Youngfield Service Road. Interstate 70 can be seen to the right, and the proposed development area is located to the left. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 24 View looking northwest from Youngfield Service Road into the proposed development site. Construction crews can be seen to the right working on the Denver Water line that traverses the site. The bodies of water seen in the photo are owned by Coors and are beyond the proposed development area. Looking west from Youngfield Service Road into the proposed development site. Highway 58 can be seen to the left of the photo. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 25 Looking south into the proposed development area from the parking area near the Clear Creek trailhead. This was the location of the Jefferson County Animal Shelter before it was demolished in the early 2010s. View looking south along Youngfield Service Road and I-70. To the left is a pathway that provides access to the Clear Creek Trail. The developer has been very conscientious in ensuring trail access remains, as well as providing new connections through the site between Clear Creek and 32nd Avenue. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 26 View of the intersection of 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street, with Interstate 70 in the background. The City completed the necessary improvements to this intersection and underpass, per the Environmental Assessment associated with the prior Clear Creek Crossing plans. View looking south along Youngfield Service Road. The 40th Avenue underpass, completed by the Metropolitan District/Developer per the Environmental Assessment associated with the prior Clear Creek Crossing, can be seen to the left. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 27 Meeting Date: December 6, 2016 Attending Staff: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner Lisa Ritchie, Planner II Patrick Goff, City Manager Ken Johnstone, Community Development Director Scott Brink, Public Works Director Sara Spaulding, Public Information Officer Property Address: SW Corner SH 58 and I-70 Applicant: Applicant Present?: Tyler Carlson, Evergreen Development Company Christine McRight, Evergreen Development Company Lyle DeVries, Felsburg Holt & Ullevig (FHU) Jared Carlon, Norris Allison Wenlund, Norris Yes Existing Zoning: Existing Comp. Plan: Planned Commercial Development Regional Commercial Center Mixed Use Employment Existing Site Conditions: The site is located at the southwest corner of State Highway 58 and Interstate 70. The majority of the 211- acre property was annexed into the City in 2005, and an Outline Development Plan and Final Development Plan were approved shortly thereafter. The remainder of the site was annexed in 2011, the ODP was amended, and the Design Pattern Book was included to serve as design guidelines for the project. An Environmental Assessment was completed in 2006 which outlined the necessary transportation related improvements that were needed prior to retail site development. In spite of the previous approvals, the site remains primarily vacant undeveloped land. The southwest corner contains a water storage pond owned by Coors Brewing Company. Clear Creek and the adjacent Clear Creek regional trail traverses the northern portion of the site. The site is currently undergoing fill operations under separate permit, but no permanent improvements are in place. Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: The applicant is proposing to rezone to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) to expand the allowed uses to include residential and employment. Generally, the southern portion of the site EXHIBIT 6: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 28 would have minor modifications to existing Outline Development Plan, with the majority of the changes occurring on the central portion. At this time, no changes are proposed to the northern portion on property owned by Coors Brewing Company. In 2016, the City of Wheat Ridge contracted with FHU to reevaluate the approved Environmental Assessment to determine the amount of phased development that may occur without constructing the transportation improvements north of Clear Creek, including the bridge for Clear Creek Drive to cross Clear Creek and a new interchange at SH 58 near Holman Street. Attendance from the neighborhood: Approximately 60 residents and property owners from the neighborhood attended the meeting; see attached sign-up sheets. The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting: • Staff explained the purpose of this neighborhood meeting, and briefly described the process for rezoning to Planned Mixed Use Development. • The applicant gave an overview of the history of the site, and explained the development concept that likely includes a large format retailer (potentially a Super Walmart), smaller format retail, restaurant and entertainment, a new employment use, and multi-family residential development. • The meeting then transitioned to an “open house” format, with staff and the applicant taking questions in smaller group settings, with the following focus areas: Planning and Trails, Transportation and Engineering, and Leasing. The following general issues and questions were discussed regarding the application: How many dwelling units are planned? • The applicant is still determining the final number of proposed units. The multi-family is proposed to be located in the central portion of the site, or Planning Areas 1 and/or 5. What is the reason for not constructing the improvements to State Highway 58 at this time? Can the phasing for the I-70 Hook Ramps and the State Highway 58 improvements be switched? • At this time, it is cost prohibitive to require that all adjacent transportation improvements be constructed up front. The City of Wheat Ridge has been working with Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to allow a phased approach to improvements. Because the property north of Clear Creek is owned by Coors Brewing Company, who is not interested in developing that area of the site at this time, the adjacent SH 58 improvements are not currently warranted. The I-70 hooks would be adjacent to the development proposed by Evergreen and would be necessary as the first phase. Why is Walmart a potential tenant and what is the proposed size? • The Super Walmart is proposed to be roughly 190,000 square feet. Walmart has been located to the east of the site in the Applewood Village Shopping Center for approximately 40 years. Walmart was previously approved to expand into a larger facility in early Clear Creek Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 29 Crossing approvals. Walmart and Evergreen are currently still negotiating as to whether or not they will move into Clear Creek Crossing. A large format retailer is important in this type of development for the success of the smaller tenants. Will overnight camping in RVs be allowed on a potential Walmart site? • The applicant does not intend to permit this, and will be determining the appropriate means to prohibit overnight camping within the development. What is the amount of the public investment that will be provided by the City? • Wheat Ridge voters recently passed ballot question 2E, which approved a 12-year, ½ cent sales tax increase to fund certain improvements within the City. As part of that measure, approximately $10 million was allocated to the Clear Creek Crossing development to fund to construction of the I-70 hook ramps. Any additional public investment has not been determined, and will need to be approved by City Council and/or the Urban Renewal Authority. Will there be additional opportunity to comment on the development plans? • Yes, the applicant intends to hold additional community meetings to hear feedback on desired tenants and on the development plans as they proceed. In addition, the application will require public hearings before Planning Commission and City Council with opportunities for public comment. What will the future trail network look like? • A new trail is planned that will connect the Applewood Golf Course with the Clear Creek Trail. It will be located along the south and east sides of the existing water storage pond, and then likely align near Clear Creek Drive to connect to the Clear Creek Trail. In addition, general concern was expressed over the amount of children who will attend local schools, and the additional traffic that could be generated impacting 32nd Avenue. Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 30 [see attached document] EXHIBIT 7: ODP DOCUMENT APPLICANT:DATE:SHEET TITLE: C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : CLEAR CREEK CROSSING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G AN O F F I C I A L P L A N N E D M I X E D U S E O U T L I N E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O L O R A D O A P A R C E L O F L A N D , L O C A T E D I N T H E S E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 9 , T H E S W 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 0 , TH E N E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 9 , T 3 S , R 6 9 W , O F T H E S I X T H P . M . , CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O DECEMBER 14, 2016 MAY 10, 2017 JULY 21, 2017 AUGUST 30, 2017 NOVEMBER 20, 2017 JANUARY 02, 2017 LE G A L D E S C R I P T I O N CH A R A C T E R O F D E V E L O P M E N T I, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D O H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H E S U R V E Y O F T H E B O U N D A R Y O F T H E C L E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G DE V E L O P M E N T W A S M A D E B Y M E O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN AC C O R D A N C E W I T H A L L A P P L I C A B L E C O L O R A D O S T A T U T E S , C U R R E N T REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY RE P R E S E N T S S A I D S U R V E Y . CA S E H I S T O R Y TH E B E L O W - S I G N E D O W N E R ( S ) , O R L E G A L L Y D E S I G N A T E D A G E N T ( S ) THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HE R E O N W I L L B E D E V E L O P E D A S A P L A N N E D D E V E L O P M E N T I N ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN TH I S P L A N , A N D A S M A Y O T H E R W I S E B E R E Q U I R E D B Y L A W . I ( W E ) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE APPROVAL OF REZONING TO PLANNED DE V E L O P M E N T , A N D A P P R O V A L O F T H I S O U T L I N E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N , DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RI G H T S M A Y O N L Y A R I S E A N D A C C R U E P U R S U A N T T O T H E P R O V I S I O N S O F SECTION 26-121 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. OW N E R ' S C E R T I F I C A T E U N I F I E D C O N T R O L S T A T E M E N T PL A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N C E R T I F I C A T E CI T Y C E R T I F I C A T I O N JE F F E R S O N C O U N T Y C L E R K & R E C O R D E R CH A I R P E R S O N AT T E S T CI T Y C L E R K MAYOR CO M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T D I R E C T O R ST A T E O F C O L O R A D O ) ) S S CO U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N ) TH E F O R E G O I N G I N S T R U M E N T W A S A C K N O W L E D G E D B E F O R E M E T H I S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , A . D . 2 0 1 8 BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . WI T N E S S M Y H A N D A N D O F F I C I A L S E A L . M Y C O M M I S S I O N E X P I R E S : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ NO T A R Y P U B L I C ST A T E O F C O L O R A D O )) SS CO U N T Y O F J E F E R S O N ) I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H I S P L A N W A S F I L E D I N T H E O F F I C E O F T H E COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDED OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, CO L O R A D O , A T _ _ _ _ _ O ' C L O C K _ _ _ _ _ . M . O N T H E _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , A . D . , I N B O O K _ _ _ _ _ , P A G E _ _ _ _ _ , R E C EPTION NO. __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . JE F F E R S O N C O U N T Y C L E R K A N D R E C O R D E R BY : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ DE P U T Y RE C O M M E N D E D F O R A P P R O V A L T H I S _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , 2 0 _ _ B Y T H E W H E A T R I D G E P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N . AP P R O V E D T H I S _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ B Y T H E W H E A T R I D G E C I T Y C O U N C I L . CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G , L . L . C . VI C I N I T Y M A P PR O J E C T T E A M 01 CO V E R S H E E T 02 LA N D U S E M A P 03 PE R M I T T E D U S E S 04 PE R M I T T E D U S E S C O N T I N U E D PR E P A R E D F O R : CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G , L . L . C . 18 7 3 S . B E L L A I R E S T R E E T SU I T E 1 1 0 6 DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 2 2 PL A N N I N G & L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E : NO R R I S D E S I G N 11 0 1 B A N N O C K S T R E E T DE N V E R , C O 8 0 2 0 4 EN G I N E E R : MA R T I N / M A R T I N 12 4 9 9 W E S T C O L F A X A V E N U E LA K E W O O D , C O 8 0 2 1 5 SI T E P L A N N I N G : GA L L O W A Y 61 6 2 S . W I L L O W D R I V E , S U I T E 3 2 0 GR E E N W O O D V I L L A G E , C O 8 0 1 1 1 01 OF 04COVER SHEET SU R V E Y O R ' S C E R T I F I C A T E GE N E R A L N O T E TH I S O U T L I N E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N I S C O N C E P T U A L I N N A T U R E . SP E C I F I C D E V E L O P M E N T E L E M E N T S S U C H A S S I T E L A Y O U T A N D B U I L D I N G AR C H I T E C T U R E H A V E N O T B E E N A D D R E S S E D O N T H I S D O C U M E N T . A S A RE S U L T , A S P E C I F I C D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N M U S T B E S U B M I T T E D A N D AP P R O V E D B Y T H E C I T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E P R I O R T O T H E S U B M I T T A L O F BU I L D I N G P E R M I T A P P L I C A T I O N A N D A N Y S U B S E Q U E N T S I T E DE V E L O P M E N T . SI T E 3 2 n d A v e . AP P L E W O O D GO L F C O U R S E C L E A R C R E E K T O M C I N T Y R E I- 7 0 TH E C L E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G M I X E D U S E D E V E L O P M E N T I S I N T E N D E D T O PR O V I D E T H E C I T Y OF W H E A T R I D G E W I T H A D E S T I N A T I O N D E V E L O P M E N T T H A T P R O V I D E S A WI D E R A N G E O F U S E S T O H E L P G R O W T H E C I T Y ’ S C O M M E R C I A L , RE S I D E N T I A L , A N D E M P L O Y M E N T B A S E S . T H R O U G H T H E U S E O F U N I F Y I N G DE S I G N E L E M E N T S , I N C L U D I N G A R C H I T E C T U R A L S T Y L E , LA N D S C A P E D E S I G N , U R B A N D E S I G N W I T H S P E C I A L A T T E N T I O N P A I D T O IT S P U B L I C S P A C E S , T H I S P R O J E C T I S E N V I S I O N E D T O B E U N I Q U E AN D A U T H E N T I C I N I T S U S E S A N D A R C H I T E C T U R A L S T Y L E , W H I L E S T I L L PR O V I D I N G A C O H E S I V E E X P E R I E N C E F O R T H E U S E R . TH E O V E R A L L P R O J E C T W I L L F O C U S O N C R E A T I N G S T R O N G S E N S E O F P L A C E T H A T P R O T E C T S T H E C U L T U R A L H E R I T A G E A N D P R O M O T E CU L T U R A L A W A R E N E S S A N D S T R O N G K I N S H I P T I E S . C L E A R C R E E K CR O S S I N G W I L L C E L E B R A T E T H E I N T R I N S I C V A L U E S T H A T D E F I N E T H E CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E A N D W I L L E M B R A C E T H E S I M P L E B E A U T I E S O F TH E L A N D S C A P E I N A N A U T H E N T I C G E S T U R E . T H E O V E R A L L D E S I G N TH E M E F O R T H E P R O J E C T I S A M O D E R N A G R A R I A N D E S I G N A E S T H E T I C TH A T B L E N D S T R A D I T I O N A L A G R A R I A N F O R M S A N D M A T E R I A L S WI T H M O D E R N A R C H E T Y P E S A N D U S E R S . T O A C C O M P L I S H T H I S T H E M I N G WI T H I N T H E D I S T I N C T L A N D U S E S W I T H I N T H E P R O J E C T , A G R O U P OF D I S T R I C T S H A V E B E E N E S T A B L I S H E D T O A L L O W A U N I Q U E T R E A T M E N T FO R E A C H L A N D U S E W H I L E M A I N T A I N I N G C O H E S I V E D E S I G N EL E M E N T S T H R O U G H O U T A L L D I S T R I C T S . T H E P R O J E C T I S E N V I S I O N E D T O B E O N E G R O W N F R O M T H E E A R T H W I T H A S T R O N G E M P H A S I S ON T H E B A S E P L A N E A N D T H E B U I L D I N G S I N T E G R A T I O N W I T H T H E S I T E AN D S U R R O U N D I N G C O N T E X T . WI T H T H E S I T E ’ S P R O X I M I T Y T O C L E A R C R E E K , A L O N G W I T H T H E R I C H HI S T O R Y O F T H E A R E A , T H E O V E R A L L C H A R A C T E R O F T H I S DE V E L O P M E N T W I L L F O C U S O N A S T R O N G C O N N E C T I O N T O T H E C R E E K TH R O U G H T H E U S E O F T R A I L N E T W O R K S , S I G N A G E , W A Y F I N D I N G GR A P H I C S , A N D O T H E R S I T E A M E N I T I E S . TH I S D E V E L O P M E N T W I L L F O C U S O N A C O M M U N I T Y D R I V E N A P P R O A C H , AC C O M P L I S H E D B Y C R E A T I N G C O N N E C T I O N S T O T H E SU R R O U N D I N G N E I G H B O R H O O D S F O R E A S Y A C C E S S I N T O T H E S I T E , UN I F Y I N G D E S I G N E L E M E N T S , A N D P R O V I D I N G N U M E R O U S OP P O R T U N I T I E S T O S H O P , L I V E , W O R K , A N D P L A Y W I T H I N T H I S D E V E L O P M E N T . LO T S 1 A N D 2 , B L O C K 1 ; LO T S 1 A N D 2 , B L O C K 2 ; LO T 1 , B L O C K 3 ; LO T S 1 , 2 A N D 3 , B L O C K 4 ; AN D T R A C T S A A N D B ; CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G S U B D I V I S I O N F I L I N G N O . 2 , CO U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O TO T A L A R E A O F A L L P A R C E L S = 4 , 7 9 1 , 2 8 7 S Q . F T . ( 1 0 9 . 9 9 3 A C R E S ) M O R E O R L E S S NO T E : T H E P R O P O S E D P L A N N I N G A R E A L A N D V A L U E S H E R E I N H A V E B E E N AD J U S T E D T O A C C O U N T F O R T H E R E V I S E D R O W D E D I C A T I O N . 40 t h A v e . YO U N G F I E L D SE R V I C E R O A D YO U N G F I E L D S t . SH E E T I N D E X AN X - 0 5 - 0 1 , S U P - 0 5 - 0 1 , W Z - 0 5 - 0 1 , W Z - 0 5 - 0 2 , S U P - 0 5 - 0 4 , S U P - 0 6 - 0 5 , WZ - 0 6 - 0 3 , W S - 0 6 - 0 1 , M S - 0 6 - 0 9 , M S - 0 6 - 1 0 , S U P - 1 0 - 0 1 , A N X - 1 1 - 0 1 , WZ - 1 1 - 0 1 , W Z - 1 1 - 0 2 , W S - 1 1 - 0 1 , W Z - 1 6 - 0 7 ST A T E O F C O L O R A D O ) ) S S CO U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N ) TH E F O R E G O I N G I N S T R U M E N T W A S A C K N O W L E D G E D B E F O R E M E T H I S _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D A Y O F _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , A . D . 2 0 1 8 BY _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . WI T N E S S M Y H A N D A N D O F F I C I A L S E A L . M Y C O M M I S S I O N E X P I R E S : _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ NO T A R Y P U B L I C BR O K E N H I L L 3 , L . L . C . APPLICANT:DATE:SHEET TITLE: C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : CLEAR CREEK CROSSING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G AN O F F I C I A L P L A N N E D M I X E D U S E O U T L I N E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O L O R A D O A P A R C E L O F L A N D , L O C A T E D I N T H E S E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 9 , T H E S W 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 0 , TH E N E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 9 , T 3 S , R 6 9 W , O F T H E S I X T H P . M . , CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O DECEMBER 14, 2016 MAY 10, 2017 JULY 21, 2017 AUGUST 30, 2017 NOVEMBER 20, 2017 JANUARY 02, 2017 02 OF 04LAND USE CL E A R C R E E K D R I V E ZO N I N G : P I D OF F I C E / W A R E H O U S E (E X I S T I N G ) ZONING:SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING) PL A N N I N G AR E A 1 (2 5 . 4 3 A C R E S ) RA I L R O A D R . O . W . C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E PL A N N I N G AR E A 4 (3 . 1 2 A C R E S ) PL A N N I N G A R E A 6 (1 8 . 7 5 A C R E S ) PL A N N I N G AR E A 3 (1 1 . 0 4 A C R E S ) RE G I O N A L WA T E R QU A L I T Y (1 1 . 7 2 A C R E S ) W. 32ND AVE. 4 0 T H A V E . CL E A R C R E E K LA N D S U M M A R Y PL A N N I N G A R E A 1 25 . 4 3 A C R E S PL A N N I N G A R E A 2 13 . 8 4 A C R E S PL A N N I N G A R E A 3 11 . 0 4 A C R E S PL A N N I N G A R E A 4 6. 1 0 A C R E S PL A N N I N G A R E A 5 4. 1 9 A C R E S PL A N N I N G A R E A 6 18 . 7 5 A C R E S PL A N N I N G A R E A 7 3. 4 3 A C R E S PL A N N I N G A R E A 8 15 . 4 8 A C R E S RE G I O N A L W A T E R Q U A L I T Y 1 1 . 7 2 A C R E S TO T A L 10 9 . 9 9 A C R E S FU T U R E HO O K RA M P S 1. I N T E R N A L P E D E S T R I A N C R O S S A C C E S S B E T W E E N PL A N N I N G A R E A S S H A L L B E P R O V I D E D ; L O C A T I O N S AN D A L I G N M E N T O F S U C H C O N N E C T I O N S S H A L L BE F I N A L I Z E D D U R I N G S P E C I F I C D E V E L O P M E N T PL A N S P R O C E S S I N G . 2. T H E C O L O R A D O D E P A R T M E N T O F TR A N S P O R T A T I O N “ A C C E S S C O N T R O L L I N E ” DE P I C T E D A S T H E C D O T ' A ' L I N E I S U S E D T O RE G U L A T E T H E “ C O N T R O L O F A C C E S S ” T O IN T E R S T A T E R I G H T S - O F - W A Y A N D D E S I G N A T E D FR O N T A G E R O A D S F O R B O T H T R A N S P O R T A T I O N AN D N O N - T R A N S P O R T A T I O N P U R P O S E S . A L L L A N D OW N E R S A D J A C E N T T O “ A C C E S S C O N T R O L L I N E S ” AR E R E S T R I C T E D F R O M E A C H A N D E V E R Y R I G H T OF A C C E S S , I N G R E S S , A N D E G R E S S T O PR O P E R T I E S A D J A C E N T A N D A B U T T I N G T H E AC C E S S C O N T R O L L I N E . APPLICANT:DATE:SHEET TITLE: C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : CLEAR CREEK CROSSING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G AN O F F I C I A L P L A N N E D M I X E D U S E O U T L I N E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O L O R A D O A P A R C E L O F L A N D , L O C A T E D I N T H E S E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 9 , T H E S W 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 0 , TH E N E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 9 , T 3 S , R 6 9 W , O F T H E S I X T H P . M . , CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O DECEMBER 14, 2016 MAY 10, 2017 JULY 21, 2017 AUGUST 30, 2017 NOVEMBER 20, 2017 JANUARY 02, 2017LEGENDPLANNING AREA BOUNDARY EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL PROPOSED PRIMARY TRAIL VEHICULAR ACCESS (CONCEPTUAL) PL A N N I N G AR E A 2 (1 3 . 8 4 A C R E S ) PLANNING AREA 5 (4 . 1 9 A C R E S ) PL A N N I N G AR E A 7 (3 . 4 3 A C R E S ) PL A N N I N G AR E A 4 (2 . 9 8 A C R E S ) PL A N N I N G AR E A 8 (1 5 . 4 8 A C R E S ) ZO N I N G : P C D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) MU L T I - U S E T R A I L C O N N E C T I O N (B Y P R O S P E C T R E C R E A T I O N AN D P A R K D I S T R I C T ) NO T E S ZO N I N G : P C D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) OFF-SITE MULTI-USE TRAIL CONNECTION CDOT 'A' LINEPLANNING AREA PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR CROSS ACCESS (CONCEPTUAL)PROPOSED SECONDARY TRAIL CLEAR CREEK APPLICANT:DATE:SHEET TITLE: C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : CLEAR CREEK CROSSING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G AN O F F I C I A L P L A N N E D M I X E D U S E O U T L I N E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O L O R A D O A P A R C E L O F L A N D , L O C A T E D I N T H E S E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 9 , T H E S W 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 0 , TH E N E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 9 , T 3 S , R 6 9 W , O F T H E S I X T H P . M . , CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O DECEMBER 14, 2016 MAY 10, 2017 JULY 21, 2017 AUGUST 30, 2017 NOVEMBER 20, 2017 JANUARY 02, 2017 03 OF 04USE TABLE AL L O W E D U S E S PA - 1 P A - 2 PA - 3 PA - 4 PA - 5 PA - 6 PA - 7 PA - 8 RE S I D E N T I A L I N C L U D I N G : AS S I S T E D L I V I N G F A C I L I T Y P P N P N P P P N P N P DW E L L I N G , S I N G L E A T T A C H E D NP P N P N P P P N P N P DW E L L I N G , D U P L E X NP P N P N P P P N P N P DW E L L I N G , M U L T I P L E P P N P N P P P N P N P DW E L L I N G , L I V E / W O R K P P N P N P P P N P N P PU B L I C , C I V I C A N D I N S T I T U T I O N A L I N C L U D I N G : CO M M U N I T Y B U I L D I N G S I N C L U D I N G L I B R A R I E S , A N D M U S E U M S PP P P P P P N P GO V E R N M E N T A N D Q U A S I - G O V E R N M E N T A L B U I L D I N G S A N D O F F I C E S PP P P P P P N P HO S P I T A L P N P N P N P N P N P N P N P PA R K S , O P E N S P A C E , P L A Y G R O U N D S A N D P L A Z A S PP P P P P P P PU B L I C U S E S A N D B U I L D I N G S P P N P N P N P N P N P N P I N D O O R A M U S E M E N T A N D R E C R E A T I O N A L E N T E R P R I S E S PP P P P P P N P OU T D O O R A M U S E M E N T F A C I L I T I E S P P P PP P P N P SC H O O L S , P U B L I C A N D P R I V A T E , C O L L E G E S , U N I V E R S I T I E S , T R A D E SC H O O L S P P NP N P N P N P N P N P UT I L I T I E S , M A J O R NP N P N P N P N P N P N P P UT I L I T I E S , M I N O R PP P P P P P P UR B A N G A R D E N S ( S E E 2 6 - 6 3 7 ) P P N P N P N P N P N P N P TR A N S I T S T A T I O N S , P U B L I C O R P R I V A T E PP P P P P P N P WA T E R S T O R A G E NP N P N P N P N P N P N P P CO M M E R C I A L S E R V I C E S A N D R E T A I L I N C L U D I N G : AD U L T E N T E R T A I N M E N T NP N P N P N P N P N P N P N P A M U S E M E N T F A C I L I T I E S O R O U T D O O R R E C R E A T I O N PP P P P P P N P AN I M A L D A Y C A R E , I N D O O R W I T H N O O U T D O O R R U N S O R P E N S PP P N PP P P N P AP P L I A N C E , H O M E I M P R O V E M E N T A N D H O M E F U R N I S H I N G S T O R E S PP P P P P P N P AU T O S E R V I C E A S A N A C C E S S O R Y T O P R I M A R Y P N P N P PP P P N P BA N K S A N D F I N A N C I A L I N S T I T U T I O N S , N O D R I V E - T H R O U G H O R D R I V E - U P PN PP P P P P N P BA N K S A N D F I N A N C I A L I N S T I T U T I O N S , D R I V E - T H R O U G H O R D R I V E - U P PN PP *P P P P N P BA R S , T A V E R N S A N D N I G H T C L U B S PP P P P P P N P CA R W A S H E S , A S A C C E S S O R Y T O R E T A I L N PN PN PP P P P N P DA Y C A R E C E N T E R , C H I L D A N D A D U L T PP P P P P P N P DR I V E - U P O R D R I V E - T H R O U G H U S E S ( S E E 2 6 - 1 1 0 6 E W H E A T R I D G E M U N I . CO D E ) P N P P * P P P N P N P DR U G S T O R E S , D R I V E - T H R O U G H O R D R I V E - U P PP P P P P P N P EA T I N G E S T A B L I S H M E N T , S I T D O W N PP P P P P P N P EA T I N G E S T A B L I S H M E N T , D R I V E - T H R O U G H O R D R I V E - U P PN PP *P P P P N P GR O C E R Y & S P E C I A L T Y F O O D S T O R E S P P P PP P P N P HA I R , N A I L A N D C O S M E T I C S E R V I C E S PP P P P P P N P LE G E N D : P: P E R M I T T E D U S E NP : N O T P E R M I T T E D U S E SU : S P E C I A L U S E NO T E S : 1. O U T D O O R D I S P L A Y A L L O W E D A S S H O W N O N T H E S P E C I F I C D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N A N D I S SU B J E C T T O S E C T I O N 2 6 - 6 3 1 O F T H E W H E A T R I D G E C O D E O F L A W S . T E M P O R A R Y S A L E S A R E AL L O W E D P U R S U A N T T O S E C T I O N 2 6 - 6 3 0 O F T H E W H E A T R I D G E C O D E O F L A W S . 2. A R C H I T E C T U R A L D E S I G N , S I T E D E S I G N , S T R E E T S C A P E , S I G N A G E , F E N C I N G , L I G H T I N G A N D LA N D S C A P I N G S H A L L B E I N C O N F O R M A N C E W I T H T H E C L E A R C R E E K CROSSING DESIGN PA T T E R N B O O K , K E P T O N F I L E W I T H T H E C I T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . * D R I V E - U P O R D R I V E - T H R U U S E S P E R M I T T E D O N L Y A S P A R T O F A MU L T I - T E N A N T B U I L D I N G APPLICANT:DATE:SHEET TITLE: C H E C K E D B Y : D R A W N B Y : CLEAR CREEK CROSSING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CL E A R C R E E K C R O S S I N G AN O F F I C I A L P L A N N E D M I X E D U S E O U T L I N E D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O L O R A D O A P A R C E L O F L A N D , L O C A T E D I N T H E S E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 1 9 , T H E S W 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 0 , TH E N E 1 4 O F S E C T I O N 2 9 , T 3 S , R 6 9 W , O F T H E S I X T H P . M . , CI T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E , C O U N T Y O F J E F F E R S O N , S T A T E O F C O L O R A D O DECEMBER 14, 2016 MAY 10, 2017 JULY 21, 2017 AUGUST 30, 2017 NOVEMBER 20, 2017 JANUARY 02, 2017 04 OF 04USE TABLE CONTINUED AL L O W E D U S E S , C O N T I N U E D PA - 1 P A - 2 PA - 3 PA - 4 PA - 5 P A - 6 PA - 7 PA - 8 CO M M E R C I A L S E R V I C E S A N D R E T A I L I N C L U D I N G ( C O N T I N U E D ) : HA R D W A R E S T O R E S P P P P P P P N P LI Q U O R S T O R E S NP N P P P P P P N P MO T O R F U E L I N G S T A T I O N S NP N P N P P P P P N P MO T O R V E H I C L E S A L E S , O U T D O O R D I S P L A Y NP N P N P N P N P N P N P N P MO T O R V E H I C L E S A L E S , I N D O O R D I S P L A Y PP P P P P P N P OP T I C A L S T O R E S P P P P P P P N P OU T D O O R S T O R A G E A S A C C E S S O R Y U S E P N P N P N P N P N P N P N P PA W N B R O K E R S NP N P N P N P N P N P N P N P PE R S O N A L S E R V I C E S P P P P P P P N P PH O T O C O P Y I N G A N D P R I N T I N G P P P P P P P N P PR O D U C E S T A N D S ( S E E 2 6 - 6 3 6 A N D 2 6 - 6 1 3 F O R H O M E O C C U P A T I O N PP P P P P P N P RE C R E A T I O N A L F A C I L I T I E S , C O M M E R C I A L PP P P P P P N P RE P A I R , R E N T A L A N D S E R V I C I N G O F A U T O M O B I L E S , N O O U T D O O R S T O R A G E PN P N P P P P P N P RE T A I L PP P P P P P N P SP O R T I N G G O O D S S T O R E P P P P P P P N P VE T E R I N A R Y C L I N I C S A N D H O S P I T A L S , N O O U T D O O R R U N S O R P E N S PP P P P P P N P HO S P I T A L I T Y A N D E N T E R T A I N M E N T I N C L U D I N G : AR T S T U D I O S A N D G A L L E R I E S P P P P P P P N P HO T E L S , M O T E L S A N D E X T E N D E D S T A Y L O D G I N G PP P P P P P N P PR I V A T E C L U B S A N D S O C I A L C L U B S NP N P N P N P N P N P N P N P ST U D I O S I N C L U D I N G A R T , M U S I C , D A N C E , T V A N D R A D I O B R O A D C A S T I N G ST A T I O N S PP P P P P P N P TE M P O R A R Y O U T D O O R T H E A T E R / P E R F O R M A N C E P P P P P P P N P TH E A T E R S PP P P P P P N P OF F I C E A N D I N D U S T R I A L I N C L U D I N G : ME D I C A L A N D D E N T A L C L I N I C S P P P P P P P N P OF F I C E S PP P P P P P N P OF F I C E - W A R E H O U S E , N O O U T D O O R S T O R A G E P N P N P N P N P N P N P N P PR O C E S S I N G , A S S E M B L Y O R L I G H T I N D U S T R I A L O P E R A T I O N S SU N P N P N P N P N P N P N P RE S E A R C H L A B O R A T O R I E S A N D O F F I C E S P P N P N P N P N P N P N P WA R E H O U S E NP N P N P N P N P P N P N P WH O L E S A L E NP N P N P N P N P P N P N P AN C I L L A R Y U S E S I N C L U D I N G : PA R K I N G F A C I L I T I E S ( I N C L U D I N G S T R U C T U R E S ) PP P P P P P N P TE M P O R A R Y U S E S I N C L U D I N G : SP E C I A L E V E N T S , I N C L U D I N G F E S T I V A L A N D F A R M E R S M A R K E T S ( S E E 26 - 6 3 5 ) PP P P P P P N P OT H E R SI M I L A R U S E S P E R S E C T I O N 2 6 - 3 0 9 O F T H E W H E A T R I D G E C O D E O F L A W S P P P P P P P N P LE G E N D : P: P E R M I T T E D U S E NP : N O T P E R M I T T E D U S E SU : S P E C I A L U S E NO T E S : 1. O U T D O O R D I S P L A Y A L L O W E D A S S H O W N O N T H E S P E C I F I C D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N A N D I S SU B J E C T T O S E C T I O N 2 6 - 6 3 1 O F T H E W H E A T R I D G E C O D E O F L A W S . T E M P O R A R Y S A L E S A R E AL L O W E D P U R S U A N T T O S E C T I O N 2 6 - 6 3 0 O F T H E W H E A T R I D G E C O D E O F L A W S . 2. A R C H I T E C T U R A L D E S I G N , S I T E D E S I G N , S T R E E T S C A P E , S I G N A G E , F E N C I N G , L I G H T I N G A N D LA N D S C A P I N G S H A L L B E I N C O N F O R M A N C E W I T H T H E C L E A R C R E E K CROSSING DESIGN PA T T E R N B O O K , K E P T O N F I L E W I T H T H E C I T Y O F W H E A T R I D G E C O M M U N I T Y D E V E L O P M E N T DE P A R T M E N T . Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 31 [see attached document] EXHIBIT 8: DESIGN PATTERN BOOK Design Pattern Book January, 2018 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0.0 DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS 5 0.1 Design Development Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.0 OVERVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 1.1 Property Description & Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.2 Purpose & Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3 Planning Goals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.4 Document Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 Site Planning Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5.1 Site Analysis and Constraints . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.6 Concept Description and Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.6.1 Concept Site Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.0 SITE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.1 Development Standards. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2 Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.1 District Diagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.2 Planning Area 1: Mill District Development Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.2.3 Planning Area 2: Homestead District Development Standards . . . . . . 2.2.4 Planning Areas 3-4: Vineyard District Development Standards . . . . . . 2.2.5 Planning Areas 5-7: Harvest District Development Standards . . . . . . . 2.2.6 Planning Area 8: Wagon District Development Standards . . . . . . . . . . 2.3 Streets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.1 Public Street Design and Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.2 Private Street Design and Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.3 Public Street Sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.3.4 Conceptual Private Street Sections. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4 Pedestrian Connectivity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.1 Pedestrian Connectivity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.2 Public Trails, Sidewalks & Bike Lanes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.4.3 Pedestrian Access & Circulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.5 Parking & Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.6 Bicycle Parking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.7 Service & Loading Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.8 Fencing & Screening . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.9 Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.10 Plaza & Gathering Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.11 Open Space & Views . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.12 Public Art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.0 BUILDING DESIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 3.1 Building Form, Height & Massing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2 Pedestrian Oriented Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.3 Variety and Scale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.4 Building Facades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 Building Transparency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.6 Building Entries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.7 Awnings and Canopies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.8 Parking Structures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.9 Roof Top Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.10.1 Multifamily - Site Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.10.2 Multifamily - Architecture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4.0 MATERIALS 75 4.1 Building Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.2 Material Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.0 LANDSCAPE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 5.1 General Landscape Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.2 Landscape Design within Districts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.3 Trees, Shrubs & Plants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.4 Streetscapes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5 Site Furnishings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.6 Trail Furnishings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.0 LIGHTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 6.1 Street & Parking Area Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.2 Pedestrian Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.3 Accent Lighting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.4 General Light Standards and Intensity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.0 SIGNAGE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 7.1 Conceptual Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.2 Signage Family . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.3 Signage Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.4 Freestanding Signs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.5 Building Signs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX B: MASTER MATERIAL PALETTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . APPENDIX C: PLANT LIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CLEAR CREEK CROSSING4 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 5 0.0 - DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS CLEAR CREEK CROSSING6 0.0 Schematic Design Review Process Clear Creek Crossing ODP must comply with all applicable statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations promulgated by the City and other governmental entities which have jurisdiction over the Project, including revocable permits in the right-of-way (ROW), Americans with Disabilities Act, building permits, and permits for other public works matters. GENERAL COMPLIANCE APPLICABILITY OBJECTIVE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SCHEMATIC DESIGN A pre-application meeting shall be held between the Applicant and with both the ACC as well as City of Wheat Ridge to review the scope of the Project, the design review process, and identify all requirements, presumptions and considerations. The Applicant shall submit at the pre-application meeting the following: • Intent Statement • Development scope, Project uses and adjacent uses, and Project description • Context Photos • Conceptual Site Plan • Conceptual Elevations, are encouraged • Any special considerations The Applicant team shall submit a Schematic Design Development Plan to the ACC. The ACC will request a meeting to discuss the application within 14 days from the receipt of the Schematic Design Plan. At this meeting, the Schematic Plan will be reviewed for compliance with the ODP and Design Pattern Book. In addition, the Application will be reviewed for its overall compatibility with the Project Vision Book. The applicant shall submit the following: • Narrative describing elements of Project design and their compliance with the ODP and DPB. • Site Plan • Floor Plans • Elevations All development within Clear Creek Crossing is subject to the Clear Creek Crossing Design Pattern Book. Design review shall be conducted by the Architectural Control Committee (ACC) as established by the Master Developer and the City of Wheat Ridge. The objective of the design review process is to create a clear, consistent, and predictable process for development at the Project. The ACC shall perform schematic design review prior to the planning review process required and conducted by the City of Wheat Ridge. The Applicant team shall meet with or submit approved design documents to the ACC at the following four key Project phases: Pre-Application Conference, Schematic Design, Design Development, and Final Recordation Phase. Informal design review meetings may be requested by the Applicant at any point in the development process as necessary to identify solutions on specif c issues. APPROVAL The Schematic Design Development Plan shall be reviewed and comments shall be provided by ACC to Applicant within 14 business days after receipt of such submittal. ACC shall approve, recommend revision and re-submittal for subsequent Schematic Design Review or deny the submittal. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 7 0.1 Design Development Review Process DESIGN DEVELOPMENT City Staff shall include the Clear Creek Crossing ACC in its referral process as it relates to documents and plans submitted to City of Wheat Ridge within the requirements of Specif c Development Plan review and approval processes. The ACC will provide comments on these documents and plans to Wheat Ridge planning staff as requested in referral correspondence. Schematic Design review comments and approval correspondence will be provided to Wheat Ridge planning staff as an attachment to the referral comments. The City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission has the ability to grant waivers to the standards set forth in this Design Pattern Book through a Specif c Development Plan public hearing. MODIFICATION OF DESIGN STANDARDS These Design Standards are intended to have some f exibility. The ACC, with Wheat Ridge Community Development Director review and approval, may grant an alternative to a design standard if it f nds the Applicant has satisf ed the following: • Alternative is consistent with the stated intent of the design standard. • Alternative achieves or implements the stated intent to the same degree or better than strict compliance to the design standard would have achieved otherwise. • Alternative will not create adverse impacts on adjacent developments. AMENDMENT OF DESIGN PATTERN BOOK ARCHITECTURAL CONTROL COMMITTEE (ACC) The ACC shall be permitted to recommend amendment of the text of the Design Pattern Book at any time. However, if the ACC elects to amend the text of any of the provisions, such amendment shall not be effective until the ACC obtains written approval of the consent of the Wheat Ridge Community Development Director. Committee: • 3 seats, appointed by mutual agreement between the Developer and City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Director: • 2 seats held by the Developer • 1 seat held by City of Wheat Ridge Planning Staff member Summary of Schematic Review Procedure and Architectural Control Committee’s Role: • Submittal to ACC for Schematic Design Review and Approval • ACC provides letter to City regarding required schematic design review indicating plans are consistent with the intent of the overall development including any conditions or stipulations of approval. • City of Wheat Ridge referral to ACC during SDP review and approval processes. • ACC provides letter from to City regarding SDP document referrals, describing any signif cant differences from approved schematic design and including any additional comments relative to the design intent of the proposed site plan. CLEAR CREEK CROSSING8 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 9 1.0 - PROJECT OVERVIEW CLEAR CREEK CROSSING10 1.1 Property Description Located at the southwest quadrant of Hwy 58 and I-70 in Wheat Ridge, Clear Creek Crossing is an 100-acre Planned Mixed-Use development, including retail, entertainment, hotel, multifamily residential and employment land uses. With the site’s proximity to Clear Creek, the Project will include a strong connection to the creek with its trail networks to and through the planned development. Clear Creek Crossing’s community-driven approach will embrace simplicity in its design, taking cues from the natural beauty and history of the location while taking advantage of visibility and direct accessibility to a major freeway corridor, providing the community with exciting new opportunities to live, work, shop, dine, stay and play. Clear Creek Crossing Outline Development Plan (ODP) includes eight (8) planning areas, each with unique development standards. The site’s location at the junction of I-70 and Hwy 58 offers an opportunity for a wide mix of uses within the planned development, given its superb visibility and accessibility, via planned ramps directly into Clear Creek Crossing. The site envelopes a signif cant portion of Clear Creek and its associated trail, providing existing connections to regional trails and surrounding communities. Refer to the Clear Creek Crossing ODP for the allowable use chart and a depiction of the individual planning areas. Specif c Project guidelines and land development standards are detailed in the Clear Creek Crossing Design Pattern Book, intended to provide clear and consistent direction for the future development of the Project. 11DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 1. 1 V i c i n i t y M a p NO R T H CLEAR CREEK CROSSING12 The Clear Creek Crossing Design Pattern Book, (the “CCC-DPB”) serves as a complementary document to the Clear Creek Crossing Planned Mixed Use Outline Development Plan, (the “CCC-ODP”) approved pursuant to Case No. WZ-16-07. The purpose of the CCC-DPB is to establish design and regulatory guidelines adopted by City of Wheat Ridge, intended as a guiding document that works with the CCC-ODP. Included with the CCC-ODP submittal, the Clear Creek Crossing Vision Book articulates the conceptual design direction of the planned mixed use development, whereas the CCC-DPB and ODP provide the framework for guiding the development requirements and design direction through the various Specif c Development Plan approvals that will be processed throughout the duration of Project’s development. The CCC-DPB establishes guidelines as well as standards for Clear Creek Crossing, through the application of rules and regulations with the intention of creating a unique mixed-use environment optimally suited to its location at the conf uence of a state highway and interstate freeway. These guidelines will establish a framework to guide developers, users, tenants and their respective design teams through the process of creating a clear and consistent design aesthetic that will work in unity with each of the Project’s Planning Areas, while contributing to the greater whole that is the City of Wheat Ridge. While the goals established in the CCC-DPB are meant to provide a clear and consistent direction for the initial and future development, they are also intended to be reasonably f exible. As market conditions change and building uses and types evolve over time, these guidelines are intended to encourage a level of design creativity that contributes to the uniqueness and sense of place envisioned for Clear Creek Crossing. The guidelines and standards set forth must strike a balance between f exibility and predictability as follows: 1. Recognize that the Project will be developed over time; 2. Create and maintain a standard of quality that will sustain value; 3. Promote a cohesive development pattern, while allowing for diversity and variety in the design and construction of individual Projects; and 4. Guide city planners, designers, developers and users/owners in making consistent choices that reinforce the Project goals. 1.2 Purpose and Guidelines DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 13 1.3 Planning Goals PROJECT GOAL: The overall goal for Clear Creek Crossing is to create a thriving mixed use environment that creates a strong sense of place and provides the community with a gathering place in an environment that is safe, comfortable, casual and enjoyable to visitors of all ages. The development plan will guide the combination of a variety of uses such as retail, restaurant, hospitality, entertainment, multifamily residential, off ce and/or employment into a cohesive Project with strong patterns that are walkable and easily identif able, with well-balanced groupings of buildings that work together to enhance not only the overall character of the Project, but its surroundings as well. The character of Clear Creek Crossing will be def ned by its unique architectural style, pedestrian plazas, multi-use trail connections and cohesive unifying elements that integrate its varied land uses into one Project that enhances the community with its unique identity. CORE DESIGN OBJECTIVES: The core architectural and urban design values in the Clear Creek Crossing Development Plan should be implemented through the following objectives: • Create a diverse, mixed use context that creates a strong sense of place and a destination for the surrounding communities. • Develop a master site plan that encourages connectivity of uses through vehicular and pedestrian circulation where possible given the constraints present within the site. • Provide a rich and diverse network of streets and pedestrian walks and bike ways that connect the Project both internally and externally to surrounding neighborhoods, in a meaningful way providing the user with a unique experience not found elsewhere. • Create a walkable outdoor experience that extends the hours of activities and provides the community with a central gathering space that offers a variety of activities for everyone to enjoy. • Establish an architectural theme that connects to the history of the site and community, while encouraging progressive design with high quality and eff cient materials. DESIGN INTENT The Intent Statement serves as a big picture goal with objectives establishing principles for the design topic. In areas where there may not be a specif c Standard or Guideline, the Intent Statements are used to provide the design team with direction in resolving any questions or lack of clarity that the Outline Development Plan does not address. These Intent Statements should not be used, in and of themselves, as Standards or Guidelines. 1.4 Document Organization The Clear Creek Crossing Design Guidelines are organized into six categories: • Site Design • Building Design / Architectural Elevations • Product Standards • Landscape • Lighting • Signage DESIGN STANDARDS Design Standards are prescriptive criteria that provide specif c directions based on the Intent Statements. These Design Standards denote issues that are considered essential and will use the term “shall” to indicate that compliance is required. DESIGN GUIDELINES Design Guidelines provide the designers with additional considerations and alternative ways to accomplish the Intent Statements. The Design Guidelines are not mandatory criteria but will be considered a strong desire of the development. Design Guidelines use the term “should” or “may” to denote direction considered appropriate rather than mandatory in accomplishing the Intent Statement. Each of the topics are then comprised of three major components that shall provide a guide for developers and designers through the process. • Design Intent • Design Standards • Design Guidelines CLEAR CREEK CROSSING14 1.5 Site Planning Approach When developing the Clear Creek Crossing site plan, consider physical characteristics and surrounding interests. 1. First and foremost, recognize the impacts of traff c to and through the site, outside of any site design, but given the uses being requested based on relevant market demand. Limit allowable development based on what “Phase Two I-70 Improvements” can support. 2. Consider the relative peripheral location of the site, and how it connects to surrounding established neighborhoods as well as to the region/ city. 3. Consider physical characteristics of the site including topography as well as set public street and freeway ramp connections and their related constraints such as A-line, the Colorado Department of Transportation “access control line” is used to regulate the “control of access” to interstate rights-of-way and designated frontage roads for both transportation and non-transportation purposes. All land owners adjacent to “access control lines” are restricted from each and every right of access, from or to any part of Clear Creek Crossing Drive and the west-bound Interstate 70 off and on ramps, including the ability to ingress and egress properties adjacent and abutting the access control. Recognize that there are two streets in the Project, connecting offsite to the east and south and terminating in the Project where they connect to create a signalized intersection within the Project. 4. Ensure that site planning efforts on this phase of CCC will not constrain future phases, including Molson Coors land as well as proposed extension/connection of Clear Creek Dr to Hwy 58, neither of which are included in this ODP. Set site planning priorities to guide successful Project outcomes. 1. Create marketable parcels to support the feasibility of CCC: Design circulation networks (vehicular.pedestrian/bicycle) to be effective onsite as well as offsite i. Multiple buildings with varying functions and required interconnectivity, ii. Large parking f elds to accommodate parking-ratio requirements and optimize access to buildings from parking lots, iii. Ring road providing access to parking f elds as well as building entrances, iv. Allow walls, fencing, security gate, etc. depending upon Employer’s operational needs. 2. Recognize that retail sales tax revenues from future users/tenants support the overall feasibility of this Project. 3. Meet parking requirements of users as a peripheral location is vehicle-oriented. a. Parcels, especially retail and hotel, should maximize opportunities of an interstate location, focusing on accessibility as well as visibility to broaden market as much as possible, capitalizing on “drive-by I-70” traff c, whether as commute or mountain trip. b. Multifamily residential and hotel parcels should capitalize on view corridors as well as connections to other parcels for working and shopping. c. Employment parcel should respond to a user’s likely site design requirements to maximize marketability, including: a. Employees and Employment Campus Visitors b. Apartment residents c. Hotel guests d. Retail shoppers e. Local and “Regional Traff c” Diners f. Drive-through customers, whether to bank(s), fuel, restaurants or “other” such as pharmacy, car wash, package pick-up, etc. g. Traff c with no intentions of stopping at CCC, including local traff c as well as “bypass” traff c avoiding I-70 issues. h. Visitors to Clear Creek Trail, whether driving, walking or cycling to and through the site, potentially with an intention of shopping or dining. 1. Consider ‘who’ will be visiting CCC and facilitate where they need to go, both with the Project and in terms of access to/from CCC: 2. Maintain pedestrian/cyclist connectivity. Safety should be a high priority in design. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 15 Determine the overall approach to site planning for the Project, from which development standards will be established. 1. Walkability and connectivity are high priorities for this mixed-use development. 2. Interstate visibility corridors are signif cant factors in marketability of parcels and drive value for many parcels. Given this consideration, view corridors must be maintained and in many locations along both Clear Creek Dr. and 40th Avenue, the street-oriented building placement is not the best approach to developing an effective master site plan. 3. Natural amenities def ne the uniqueness of the site and should be embraced whether through view corridors to the mountains and creek, or through a circulation plan that integrates on the on-site multi-use trail and sidewalk system with existing sidewalks and regional trails. Planning Area (PA) access points should respond to Circulation Plan as well as likely uses within each PA and adjacent PAs. 1. PA site design should respond to street and pedestrian circulation system (see Sections 2.2 Streets & 2.3 Pedestrian Connectivity) as well as future users’ site requirements in a way that supports parcel marketability but also promotes the Project vision, connecting the proposed land uses within the Master Plan as well as to the community. 2. PA site design should consider requirements and constraints of physical characteristics of each respective area. 3. PA site design should facilitate connections between planning areas as well as throughout the Project in order to encourage an optimally functioning mixed-use development. 1.5 Site Planning Approach (cont.) CLEAR CREEK CROSSING16 1.5.1 Site Analysis and Constraints The site planning approach for Clear Creek Crossing is inf uenced by several key opportunities as well as constraints presented by the existing site conditions that drive the development plan. The proximity to Clear Creek as well as its regional trail, and spectacular views of Green Mountain and South Table Mountain are signif cant to the site as a whole and especially to Planning Area 2’s multi-family residential use; its location directly adjacent to this corridor aims to embrace the Creek and associated views and to provide convenient access for the residents to the Clear Creek Trail. The I-70 visibility corridor drives the location of all the site uses, especially as it pertains to visibility of retail and commercial uses. The CDOT “access line” or “A-Line” which restricts any access drives in this def ned area associated with the freeway ramps, limits access point f exibility to several parcels also directing the overall traff c patterns in the development. Also, the steep slopes throughout the site drive where access points can be placed along public roadways and inf uence opportunities for cross access between planning areas. The Denver Water easement that runs through the site constrains land use options given the restrictions on various elements within that easement. Lastly, the 100-year and 500-year f ood plains further constrain the site overall. 17DESIGN PATTERN BOOK CL E A R C R E E K CD O T ‘ A ’ L I N E CL E A R C R E E K RIP A R I A N A R E A ST E E P S L O P E S DE N V E R W A T E R EA S E M E N T VI E W S 10 0 Y E A R F L O O D LI N E ZO N I N G : S F R E S I D E N T I A L (E X I S T I N G ) CO O R S ’ W A T E R S T O R A G E MA P L E G R O V E EL E M E N T A R Y SC H O O L PA PA PA 1 1 PA PA PA PA PA P 2 2 2 2 2 PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA A P 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 P P P P P P 4 4 4 4 PA PA PA PA PA P P PA PA A A 4 4 A 4 4 PA PA PA PA PA A PA A P 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 PA PA PA A PA PA PA A A A 5 5 5 A A PA PA PA A P 6 6 6 A A A A A A 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ZO N I N G : IN D U S T R I A L (E X I S T I N G ) C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 4 0 T H A V E N U E YO U N G F I E L D S T R E E T W 3 2 N D A V E N U E A IL R O A D AP P L E W O O D G O L F C O U R S E (P R O S P E C T R E C R E A T I O N & P A R K D I S T R I C T ) PA PA PA PA PA PA A PA PA P P 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 VIE W T O G R E E N M O U N T A I N PA PA 1 1 SI T E V I E W S F R O M I - 7 0 VIEW T O S O U T H T A B L E M O U N T A I N PL A N N E D I - 7 0 HO O K R A M P S PA PA PA PA PA PA PA A A A P A A A A A 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 P RE G I O N A L WA T E R QU A L I T Y O ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) 1. 5 . 1 S i t e A n a l y s i s a n d C o n s t r a i n t s D i a g r a m NO R T H CLEAR CREEK CROSSING18 1.6 Concept Description & Site Plan Clear Creek Crossing will focus on creating a strong sense of place, protecting the area’s heritage while introducing a wide array of land uses to a site located at a key conf uence of a major traff c corridor. The planned development will celebrate the intrinsic values that def ne the City of Wheat Ridge, embracing the simple beauties of the landscape in an authentic gesture. Through a community-driven approach, Clear Creek Crossing has been planned around the priority of connecting the surrounding neighborhoods and the Clear Creek Trail. The unif ed design elements will connect the various uses within the planned mixed use development particularly at the ground plane, with site signage. Pedestrian circulation, and landscape elements providing common visual cues across the development. Through the use of unifying design elements, including architectural style, landscape design, urban design with special attention paid to its public spaces, this Project is envisioned to be unique and authentic in its uses and architectural style, while still providing a cohesive experience for the user. The overall design theme for the Project is a modern agrarian design aesthetic that blends traditional agrarian forms and materials with modern architypes and users. The Project is envisioned to be one grown from the earth with a strong emphasis on the base plane and the buildings integration with the site and surrounding context. With the site’s proximity to Clear Creek, along with the rich history of the area, the overall character of the Project will focus on a strong connection to the creek through the trail networks, signage, wayf nding graphics, and other site amenities. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 19 ZO N I N G : S F R E S I D E N T I A L (E X I S T I N G ) CO O R S ’ W A T E R S T O R A G E MA P L E G R O V E EL E M E N T A R Y SC H O O L PA 1 PA 2 PA 3 PA 4 PA 4 PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 ZO N I N G : IN D U S T R I A L (E X I S T I N G ) C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 4 0 T H A V E N U E YO U N G F I E L D S T R E E T W 3 2 N D A V E N U E RA I L R O A D AP P L E W O O D G O L F C O U R S E (P R O S P E C T R E C R E A T I O N & P A R K D I S T R I C T ) PL A N N E D I - 7 0 HO O K R A M P S PA 8 RE G I O N A L WA T E R QU A L I T Y ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) CL E A R C R E E K 1. 6 . 1 C o n c e p t S i t e P l a n NO R T H CLEAR CREEK CROSSING20 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 21 2.0 - SITE DESIGN CLEAR CREEK CROSSING22 2.2 Districts The Districts have been created to def ne groupings of the eight (8) Planning Areas in the Project. The Districts are intended to provide design direction unique to the use and character of these def ned areas, while still maintaining cohesive theming through the use of architecture, landscape, urban design and signage within the Project. There are f ve unique District types within the Project: MILL - Employment uses, encouraging medium to high density development, with uses including corporate campus-type uses such as off ce, research & development, hospital, and university/education uses. Parking is likely to be a combination of surface and structure. Building height, density and setbacks ref ect the site’s location at the junction of a State highway and on an interstate freeway. VINEYARD - Retail and entertainment uses including stores, shop buildings, banks, restaurants including both full-service and quick-serve and entertainment including theater and gaming. Buildings shall be placed according to the requirements of the respective use and in consideration of the characteristics of the site, while placing a priority on circulation, walkability and common site amenities. Parking will be in surface lots, with potential for a structure to serve entertainment uses. Site design at the pedestrian level, will take an urban approach in that the site will encourage walkability, connecting Planning Areas and various tenants/users/owners within them. Where possible, siting of buildings should prioritize fronting to public or private streets with parking located behind to help establish placemaking. HOMESTEAD - Multifamily residential uses, including apartments and/or town home formats. Buildings shall be placed according to the requirements of the use and in consideration of the characteristics of the site, while placing a priority on circulation and walkability to other Districts including the adjacent Clear Creek Trail. Parking will be in surface lots; with above-grade garages tucked under units in buildings or in separate buildings allowed as well. HARVEST - Retail , in the form of large-format retail with accessory small retail, restaurants and hotel uses will create the Harvest District. Buildings shall be placed according to the requirements of the respective use and in consideration of the characteristics of the site particularly its shape and vehicular/pedestrian connections to other Districts. Parking will be in surface lots with potential for a structure to serve more intense retail or hotel uses. Signage will be “brand-forward” as required by national operators but will meet the requirements of the Clear Creek Crossing Master Sign Package. WAGON - Multi-use trail and sidewalk networks connect to all other Districts, as well as locations off-site to the north at Clear Creek Trail and to the south, at the planned trail by Prospect District connecting to the existing Applewood Golf Course and adjacent neighborhood. The trails will include common surface design, wayf nding signage, trash receptacles, benches and other amenities. Landscape will be natural and native to the region. Shade will be provided by trees and a small structure near a small surface parking lot located at the end of Clear Creek Dr. Additional street parking will be located along Clear Creek Dr, near Clear Creek and for convenient access to the existing regional trail system. 2.1 Development Standards The CCC-ODP includes eight (8) Planning Areas. Each Planning Area has a distinct set of development standards, providing an overall foundation upon which all future development shall be built. In the CCC-ODP, employment uses abut the interstate within PA-1, providing maximum visibility and access from high traff c corridors, specif cally I-70 to the east and Hwy. 58 to the north. Residential uses are thoughtfully placed to the south of Clear Creek and west of the employment uses in PA-2, providing opportunities for beautiful, unobstructed mountain and creek views, as well as excellent trail access. The balance of the planned development allows various commercial uses including retail, off ce and hotel uses. Refer to the CCC-ODP map for the permitted uses chart by Planning Area. 23DESIGN PATTERN BOOK23 | 2. 2 . 1 D i s t r i c t D i a g r a m HO M E S T E A D RE S I D E N T I A L DI S T R I C T MI L L CO M M E R C I A L DI S T R I C T HA R V E S T CO M M E R C I A L DI S T R I C T VI N E Y A R D CO M M E R C I A L DI S T R I C T CO O R S ’ W A T E R S T O R A G E PO T E N T I A L FU T U R E CO N N E C T I V I T Y (F U T U R E P H A S E ) RA I L R O A D YO U N G F I E L D S T R E E T W 3 2 N D A V E N U E MA P L E G R O V E EL E M E N T A R Y SC H O O L WA G O N OP E N S P A C E DI S T R I C T PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 PA 4 PA 4 PA 3 PA 1 PA 5 PA 2 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 4 0 T H A V E N U E AP P L E W O O D G O L F C O U R S E (P R O S P E C T R E C R E A T I O N & P A R K D I S T R I C T ) HA S HA S HA S A A E)E))E) PA 8 A V E N U E ZO N I N G : S F R E S I D E N T I A L (E X I S T I N G ) ZO N I N G : IN D U S T R I A L (E X I S T I N G ) ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) PO T E PO T E PO T E PO T E PO T NT NT NT NT N FU T U FU T U FU T U FU T U FU T R R R R CO N N CO N N CO N N CO N N CO N EC T EC T EC T EC C C (F U T (F U T (F U T (F U ( UR E RE E E UR UR PH PH PH D I HO H H H H H M R E SCO IN E Y A RD OM M E R C I A L WA GO N O PE N S P A C E DI S T R I C T PA PA 4 V CO HA RV E S T CO MM E R C IA L DI S T R I C T IME ST E A D D D D ID E N T I A L MI L L OM ME R CI A L DI S TR I CT ST R I C T ID E N T I A L OM M E R C I A L DI S TR I CT P A 6 PA 7PA 3 CO P A 1 PA 2 C L L L L L L E E A A A A A R R R C C C C C R R R R E E E E E E E E E K K K K D D D D R R R R I I I I I V V V V V V E E E E E E E E E E E E E N U N U U U U N N N N U U U N U U E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U U U U N N N U U N N N N N N N U N U N U N U N U E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U N U N U U N N E E E E E E E E E E N U E E N U E A A A A A A V E V E V E V A V A A A 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 4 T H T H T H T H T H T H A A A A A 4 0 T H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V E V E E V A A A A A A A V V V V V V A V E A A A A A A A A 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 4 4 H H T H H T H T H H H H H H H T T T H H H H T H T H T H T T T T T H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A T H T H H T H T A A A 4 0 T H A 4 0 T H A V E AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L PP AP P P A EW O O EW O O O OO EW O O O WO O O EW EW W EW EW W D G O O D G O D G O DG O DG O DG G G G G D LF C LF C LF C LF C LF C L OU R S OU R S OU R S OU R S OU R S O E E E E TI A TI A TI A A TI A I L L L L L RE E RE RE E I I I I VI T Y VI T Y VI T Y VI T Y IT Y VI T Y VI T Y HA S HA S HA S HA S AS E)E)E) E Y Y Y Y Y Y Y P A 8 ZO N I ZO N I ZO N I ZO N I ZO N I N N N N O ZO ZO O ZO ZO G: NG : NG : NG : NG NG G G NG G G G PD PD D PD P P P CO M M CO M M CO M M MM CO M M MM MM CO M CO M CO O CO O C CI CI I C C C C C C ER C ER C C ER C ER C ER ER R R R L L AL L AL AL A VA C (V A C VA C (V A C (V A C (V A C VA C VA C ((V A C AC C (V ((( T)) NT ) NT )T T NT AN T AN N AN N AN AN AN AN AN AN AN N AN ZO N I ZO N I ZO N I I I ZO N ZO N G NG NG NG NG NG :: :: : PD PD PD PD PD PD CO M M CO M M CO M M CO M M CO M M M M R ER ER ER R ER ER E RC I RC I CI I RC AL AL AL AL AL AL L (V A C (V A C AC (V A C (V A C (V A C (V A (V A AN AN N AN AN AN A A A NT ) NT ) NT ) NT ) NT ) N N CL E A R C R E E K NO R T H CLEAR CREEK CROSSING24 MILL DISTRICT KEY MAP PLANNING AREA DIAGRAM 2.2.2 PLANNING AREA 1: MILL DISTRICT DIDIDID MILL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT INEINENENEYARDYARDYARDYARDYARD OMMEOMMEMEERCIALRCIALC POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTIVITY(FUTURE PHASE) HOMHOMHOMHOMHOMOMOMO RESIRESIRRERESIREES COWAGOWAGOWWAGOWAGOWAGOWWAGOWAANNNNNN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN ENOEOPEPESPSPACESPACESPACESPACEACCSPACEAAC DISTRDISTRDISDISTRDISTRDISTSICTCTICTCTCICTICTCT PA 4PA 4PA 4A4AAPA 4PA 4AVVVV COCCO VVV PA 1 ISTRISTRSTRISTRSTRISTSICTICTICTICTTC HHARVHAESTSSTT COMMEMRCIALALAL DISTRDISTRDISTISSTRRICTICTTII OMMEOMMEMMERCIALCIALRCRDISTRDISTRDISTRSTRTRSICTICTICTICTCTCT MEMEMEMEMEMEEESTEASTEASTEASTEASTEASTSDDDDDDDDDDDDD IDIDIDDIDDENTIAENTIAENTIAENTIAENTIAENTIAENTIAENTILLLLLL MILL OMMERCIAL DISTRICT PA 5 5A 5AP PA 6 PA 7PPA 7P PA 3PA 3 CCO PA 1 PA 2PA 2PAPA 2PAA2PAPA C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 40 T H A V E N U E APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE(PROSPECT RECREATION TIATIATIAIAAL L LLLREREE TITITIIVITYVITYVITYIVITYYPHASE)PHASE)PHASE)SASE) EEEEE YYYYY PPA 8PA 8PA 8A8PA 8A8 ZONING: S(EX ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL(VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) CLEAR CREEK Employment uses encouraging medium to high density development in area adjacent to I-70 and visible from Hwy 58. Consistent with intent, guidelines and standards set forth for design theme and architecture as well as site elements detailed in the Design Pattern Book. PUBLIC GATHERING SPACE TRAILHEAD EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL PRIMARY MULTI-USE TRAIL SECONDARY TRAIL P M PUBLIC SIDEWALKP S PLANNING AREA CONNECTIVITY TRAIL CONNECTIONS EXISTING SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION LIMITED MOVEMENT INTERSECTION SS E F I S E F II PROPOSED SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION P F N P F IN INTERNAL ROAD NETWORK CDOT ‘A’ LINE MINOR ACCESS MAJOR ACCESS MILL PA 1 PPPPAAA 7777 D R I V E RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV EE D RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR 40 T H A V E N U E MILLMILL PA 1 VVVVVVIINNNNNEEEEEEYYYYYAAAAAAAARRRRRRDDDDD PPPAAAAA 3333 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 0 U U U U U E E E E E U U U U U E E E U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T T T T T T T T T 0 0 0 0 0 0 T T T T T T T T T T T T T 0 0 0 T T T T T T 0 T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U U U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U U U U U U U U N U T T T T T T T T T T E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E A A V V V V V V V A A V V T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A V V V T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H A A A T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E HHHHHHHHOOOOOOOMMMMMM PPPPPPPPAAAAA 22222222 MMMMMMMMEEEEEEESSSSSSSSTTTTTTEEEEEEAAAAADDDDDD V EE MMMMMEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTEEEEEEEEAAAAAADDDDDD DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 25 PERMITTED USES REFER TO CLEAR CREEK CROSSING OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ALL PERMITTED USES SETBACKS AND BUILDING ORIENTATION PRIMARY EMPLOYMENT USES • NO MORE THAN 30% OF THE FRONTAGE OF PA-1 MAY HAVE SURFACE PARKING WITHIN 20 FEET OF A ROADWAY. PARKING MUST BE BUFFERED FROM THE ROADWAY BY LANDSCAPING AND / OR A BUILDING • MINIMUM SETBACK ADJACENT TO PA-2 SHALL BE 5’ PER STORY COMMERCIAL / RETAIL / OTHER USES PRIMARY STREET FRONTAGE: CLEAR CREEK DRIVE • AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA SECONDARY STREET FRONTAGE: 40TH AVENUE • AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG 40TH AVENUE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA • WHERE THE PROVIDED BUILD-TO EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, THE EXCESS SHALL BE TRANSFERED TO MEET THE STANDARD ON THE OTHER STREET FRONTAGE • MINIMUM SETBACK ADJACENT TO PA-2 SHALL BE 5’ PER STORY • NOTE: BUILDING PLACEMENT, HEIGHT, DENSITY AND SETBACKS REFLECT THE SITE’S LOCATION AT THE JUNCTION OF A STATE HIGHWAY AND AN INTERSTATE FREEWAY MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 80% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 20% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT PRIMARY EMPLOYMENT USES: 90’-0” COMMERCIAL / RETAIL / OTHER SINGLE COMMERCIAL USES:62’-0” MIXED USE (DEFINED AS VERTICAL INTEGRATION OF USES):90’-0” PARKING SURFACE AND/OR STRUCTURED PARKING PER SECTION 2.3.4 (PARKING AND SERVICE) AND SECTION 3.8 (PARKING STRUCTURES). ALL PARKING SHALL MEET THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE STANDARDS, CHAPTER 26, ARTICLE V, SEC. 26-501 BICYCLE PARKING BICYCLE PARKING PER SECTION 2.4.1 (BICYCLE PARKING)1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 20 AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES, BUT NO LESS THAN 4 SPACES REFER TO SECTION 3.0 (BUILDING DESIGN) REFER TO SECTION 4.0 (MATERIALS) REFER TO SECTION 5.0 (LANDSCAPE) REFER TO SECTION 6.0 (LIGHTING) SIGNAGE REFER TO SECTION 7.0 (SIGNAGE) OTHER REQUIREMENTS PLAZA AND GATHERING AREA REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SECTION 2.7 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SECTION 2.9 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: MILL DISTRICT CLEAR CREEK CROSSING26 SITE PLANNING: MILL DISTRICT FIGURE 1: PLANNING AREA 1: EMPLOYMENT USES BUILDING ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) FIGURE 2: PLANNING AREA 1: COMMERCIAL / RETAIL / OTHER USES BUILDING ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) CLEA R C R E E K DRIVE 40 T H A V E N U E SETBACK: 5 FEET PER STORY SETBACK: 5 FEET PER STORY NO MORE THAN 30% OF THE FRONTAGE OF PLANNING AREA 1 MAY HAVE SURFACE PARKING WITHIN 20 FEET OF THE ROADWAY. PARKING MUST BE BUFFERED BY LANDSCAPING AND / OR A BUILDING CLEA R C R E E K DRIVE 40 T H A V E N U E SETBACK: 5 FEET PER STORY SETBACK: 5 FEET PER STORY AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG 40TH AVENUE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA PA-1 PA-1 30 % 50% 30 % DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 27 FIGURE 3: PLANNING AREA 1 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY FRONTAGE ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) CLEA R C R E E K DRIVE 40 T H A V E N U E PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STREET FRONTAGE FOR THE PURPOSES OF CALCULATING BUILD-TO REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOT INCLUDE PRIMARY ACCESS DRIVES, AS ILLUSTRATED SITE PLANNING: MILL DISTRICT PA-1 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING28 HOMESTEAD DISTRICT KEY MAP PLANNING AREA DIAGRAM 2.2.3 PLANNING AREA 2: HOMESTEAD DISTRICT HOMESTEAD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT CO INEINENENEYARDYARDYARDYARDYARD OMMEOMMEMEERCIALRCIALC POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTIVITY(FUTURE PHASE) HOMHHH RES DI COWAGOWAGOWWAGOWAGOWAGOWWAGOWAANNNNNN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN ENOEOPEPESPSPACESPACESPACESPACEACCSPACEAAC DISTRDISTRDISDISTRDISTRDISTSICTCTICTCTCICTICTCT PA 4PA 4PA 4A4AAPA 4PA 4AVVVVVV COCCO MILLLM OMMEOMMRCIALAL HHARVHAESTSSTT COMMEMRCIALALAL DISTRDISTRDISTISSTRRICTICTTII OMMEOMMEMMERCIALCIALRCRDISTRDISTRDISTRSTRTRSICTICTICTICTCTCT MESTEADDD IDENTIAL I OMMEERCIALCI DISTRICTCTT IDENTIAL STRICT PA 5 5A 5AP PA 6 PA 7PPA 7P PA 3PA 3 CCO PA 1PA PA 2 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 40 T H A V E N U E APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE(PROSPECT RECREATION TIATIATIAIAAL L LLLREREE TITITIIVITYVITYVITYIVITYYPHASE)PHASE)PHASE)SASE) EEEEE YYYYY PPA 8PA 8PA 8A8PA 8A8 ZONING: S(EX ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL(VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) CLEAR CREEK Residential uses encouraging medium to high density development at a location adjacent to I-70 and visible from Hwy 58. Consistent with intent, guidelines and standards set forth for design theme and architecture as well as site elements detailed in the Design Pattern Book. Flexibility to shift the Homestead District to other planning areas that allow residential uses. PPPPPPPPAAAAA 8888888 PA 2 HOMESTEAD PPPPAAA 7777 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E E GI O N A L ER Q U A L I T Y ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL CLEAR CREEK RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV EE A R R D RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR A R R R R R C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C R R R R R EE EEE KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK DKDD RR 40 T H A V E E E E E E E E E GI GI G G G G G G G G ON ON N ON ON ON ON N N O L L AL AL AL AL L AL AL A A A EEEEKKKKKKKK 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 0 0 0 T T T T T T T 0T T T T T T T T T T T A A V V T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A AV T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H A A A T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V HOM PA 2PA 2 MESTEAD V EE MESTEAD C L E E E E E R R R R R R QU QU QU QU U U QU QU U QU QU Q Q AL AL AL AL AL AL AL A A PUBLIC GATHERING SPACE TRAILHEAD EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL PRIMARY MULTI-USE TRAIL SECONDARY TRAIL P M PUBLIC SIDEWALKP S PLANNING AREA CONNECTIVITY TRAIL CONNECTIONS EXISTING SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION LIMITED MOVEMENT INTERSECTION SS E F I S E F II PROPOSED SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION P F N P F IN INTERNAL ROAD NETWORK CDOT ‘A’ LINE MINOR ACCESS MAJOR ACCESS DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 29 PERMITTED USES REFER TO CLEAR CREEK CROSSING OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ALL PERMITTED USES SITE PLANNING BUILDINGS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO THE SETBACKS OUTLINED BELOW. GIVEN PLANNING AREA’S ADJACENCY TO CLEAR CREEK TO THE NORTH AND MOUNTAIN VIEWS TO THE SOUTH, BUILDINGS SHALL BE PLACED TO CAPTURE VIEWS. PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY TO ADJACENT USES AS WELL AS WITH THE TRAIL NETWORK IS REQUIRED. WHEN MULTI-FAMILY USES ARE PROPOSED IN OTHER PLANNING AREAS, THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FROM THE HOMESTEAD DISTRICT SHALL APPLY: MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED, MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT, PARKING, BICYCLE PARKING, BUILDINGS / ARCHITECTURE, MATERIALS, LANDSCAPE, LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS. SETBACKS AND BUILDING ORIENTATION RESIDENTIAL USES PRIMARY FRONTAGE: CLEAR CREEK ORIENTATION • AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN 0-20 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE ORIENTED TOWARD CLEAR CREEK SECONDARY FRONTAGE: CLEAR CREEK DRIVE • AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA NON-RESIDENTIAL USES: PRIMARY FRONTAGE: CLEAR CREEK DRIVE • AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN 0-20 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE SECONDARY FRONTAGE: INTERNAL DRIVE • AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG THE INTERNAL DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA • NOTE: BUILDINGS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE USE AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SITE, WHILE PLACING A PRIORITY ON CIRCULATION AND WALKABILITY TO OTHER DISTRICTS INCLUDING THE ADJACENT CLEAR CREEK TRAIL MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 80% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 20% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT SINGLE USE, COMMERCIAL:56’-0” MIXED USE (DEFINED AS VERTICAL INTEGRATION OF USES):90’-0” RESIDENTIAL USES:65’-0” PARKING SURFACE AND/OR STRUCTURED PARKING PER SECTION 2.3.4 (PARKING AND SERVICE) AND SECTION 3.8 (PARKING STRUCTURES). ALL PARKING SHALL MEET THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE STANDARDS, CHAPTER 26, ARTICLE V, SEC. 26-501 1.0 SPACE PER 1 BEDROOM MFR UNIT 2.0 SPACES PER 2-3 BEDROOM MFR UNIT 2.5 SPACES PER 4 BEDROOM MFR UNIT PLUS 1.0 GUEST SPACE PER 10 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING BICYCLE PARKING PER SECTION 2.4.1 (BICYCLE PARKING)1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 10 UNITS, BUT NO LESS THAN 3 SPACES BUILDINGS / ARCHITECTURE REFER TO SECTION 3.0 (BUILDING DESIGN) AND 3.10.2 (MULTI-FAMILY ARCHITECTURE) MATERIALS REFER TO SECTION 4.0 (MATERIALS) LANDSCAPE REFER TO SECTION 5.0 (LANDSCAPE) LIGHTING REFER TO SECTION 6.0 (LIGHTING) SIGNAGE REFER TO SECTION 7.0 (SIGNAGE) OTHER REQUIREMENTS PLAZA AND GATHERING AREA REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SECTION 2.7 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SECTION 2.9 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: HOMESTEAD DISTRICT CLEAR CREEK CROSSING30 FIGURE 1: PLANNING AREA 2: RESIDENTIAL USES BUILDING ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) FIGURE 2: PLANNING AREA 2: NON-RESIDENTIAL USES BUILDING ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) CLE A R C R E E K D R I V E AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN 0-20 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE CLEA R C R E E K D R I V E AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN 0-20 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE ORIENTED TOWARD THE CREEK PA-2 PA-2 AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN 0-20 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE PRIMARY INTERNAL DRIVE: AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG THE INTERNAL DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA 50 % 5 0 % 30% 50% SITE PLANNING: HOMESTEAD DISTRICT DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 31 SITE PLANNING: HOMESTEAD DISTRICT FIGURE 3: PLANNING AREA 2 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY FRONTAGE ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) PA-2 PRIMARY STREET FRONTAGE FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING BUILD-TO REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOT INCLUDE PRIMARY ACCESS DRIVES, AS ILLUSTRATED INTERNAL DRIVE FRONTAGE FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING BUILD-TO REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOT INCLUDE PRIMARY ACCESS DRIVES, AS ILLUSTRATED CLEAR CREEK CROSSING32 VINEYARD DISTRICT KEY MAP PLANNING AREA DIAGRAM 2.2.4 PLANNING AREAS 3-4: VINEYARD DISTRICT HOMHOMHOMH RESRESIRESI DIDIDI CO VINEYARD COMMERCIALDISTRICT POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTIVITY(FUTURE PHASE) WAGOWAGOWWAGOWAGOWAGOWWAGOWAANNNNNN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN ENOEOPEPESPSPACESPACESPACESPACEACCSPACEAAC DISTRDISTRDISDISTRDISTRDISTSICTCTICTCTCICTICTCT PA 4PA 4 PA 3 V CO MEMEMEESTEASTEASTEASTDDDDD IDIDIDENTIAENTIAENTIALLL ISTRISTRISTRICTICTICT MILLLM OMMEOMMERCIALCIAL DISTRRICTCTT HHARVHAESTSSTT COMMEMRCIALALAL DISTRDISTRDISTISTRSTRRICTICTTIIC OMMERCIALDISTRICT PA 5A 5A 5AP PA 6 PA 7PPA 7P PA 3 CO PA 1P PA 2PA 2PA 2 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 40 T H A V E N U E APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE(PROSPECT RECREATION TIATIATIAIAAL L LLLREREE TITITIIVITYVITYVITYIVITYYPHASE)PHASE)PHASE)SASE) EEEEE YYYYY PPA 8PA 8PA 8A8PA 8A8 ZONING: S(EX ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL(VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) CLEAR CREEK Planning Area 3: Commercial uses including retail, restaurant and entertainment at a highly visible and accessible location adjacent to I-70. Planning Area 4: Commercial uses including retail and restaurant on highly visible and accessible pad locations north and south of the planned westbound I-70 hook ramps. Consistent with intent, guidelines and standards set forth for design theme and architecture as well as site elements detailed in the Design Pattern Book. VINEYARD PA 4PA 4 PA 3 VVVEEEESSSSSTTTT PPPPPPPPAAAA 5556666 HHHHHAAARRRVVVV PAAA 66 ZONI ET PLANNED I-70 HOOK RAMPS PA 4 AMAMAMAMAMAMPSPSPSPSPSPSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSPSS PA 4 HOHOHOHOHOOKOKOKOKOKOK RRRRRAAAAA 40 T H A V E N U E VINEYARD PA 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 0 4 4 0 4 0 U U U U U U E E E E E E U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U U U U U U U U E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T T T T T T T T 0 0 0 T T T T T T 0T N N N N N N N N N U U N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U U U U U U U N U T T T T T T T T T T E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E A A A V V V V V V T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A V V V V V T T T H H A T T H H H H H H H H A A A T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E PUBLIC GATHERING SPACE TRAILHEAD EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL PRIMARY MULTI-USE TRAIL SECONDARY TRAIL P M PUBLIC SIDEWALKP S PLANNING AREA CONNECTIVITY TRAIL CONNECTIONS EXISTING SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION LIMITED MOVEMENT INTERSECTION SS E F I S E F II PROPOSED SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION P F N P F IN INTERNAL ROAD NETWORK CDOT ‘A’ LINE MINOR ACCESS MAJOR ACCESS DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 33 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: PLANNING AREA 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: VINEYARD DISTRICT PERMITTED USES REFER TO CLEAR CREEK CROSSING OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ALL PERMITTED USES SITE PLANNING BUILDINGS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO THE SETBACKS OUTLINED BELOW. BUILD-TO STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREA 3 SHALL BE REQUIRED ON CLEAR CREEK DRIVE, 40TH AVENUE AND/OR PRIVATE INTERNAL DRIVES. REFER TO SECTION 2.3.4 FOR FURTHER STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. SETBACKS AND BUILDING ORIENTATION PRIMARY FRONTAGE: CLEAR CREEK DRIVE • AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA SECONDARY FRONTAGE: 40TH AVENUE • AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG 40TH MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA • WHERE PROVIDED BUILD-TO EXCEEDS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENT, THE REQUIRED BUILD-TO REQUIREMENT ALONG THE OTHER STREET FRONTAGE MAY BE REDUCED BY AN EQUAL AMOUNT. THIS TRANSFERABILITY APPLIES TO 40TH AVENUE, ‘ CLEAR CREEK DRIVE, AND THE INTERNAL PRIVATE DRIVE • A SETBACK OF 5 FEET PER STROY SHALL APPLY FROM THE PROPERTY LINE ABUTTING INTERSTATE 70 • MODIFICATIONS AND VARIATIONS TO THE BUILD-TO CAN BE APPROVED DURING THE SDP PROCESS, WHERE THE INTENT OF THE BUILD-TO REQUIREMENT IS BEING MET • NO PARKING SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE INTERSECTION OF CLEAR CREEK DRIVE AND 40TH AVENUE, ONLY BUILDINGS, LANDSCAPING AND HARDSCAPING SHALL BE PERMITTED (SEE PA-3 AND PA-4 SITE PLANNING ILLUSTRATION) MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 80% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 20% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT SINGLE USE, COMMERCIAL:56’-0” MIXED USE (DEFINED AS VERTICAL INTEGRATION OF USES):90’-0” RESIDENTIAL USES:65’-0” PARKING SURFACE AND/OR STRUCTURED PARKING PER SECTION 2.3.4 (PARKING AND SERVICE) AND SECTION 3.8 (PARKING STRUC-TURES). ALL PARKING SHALL MEET THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE STANDARDS, CHAPTER 26, ARTICLE V, SEC. 26-501 1.0 SPACE PER 1 BEDROOM MFR UNIT 2.0 SPACES PER 2-3 BEDROOM MFR UNIT 2.5 SPACES PER 4 BEDROOM MFR UNIT PLUS 1.0 GUEST SPACE PER 10 SPACES BICYCLE PARKING BICYCLE PARKING PER SECTION 2.4.1 (BICYCLE PARKING)1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 10 UNITS, BUT NO LESS THAN 3 SPACES BUILDINGS / ARCHITECTURE REFER TO SECTION 3.0 (BUILDING DESIGN) AND 3.10.2 (MULTI-FAMILY ARCHITECTURE) MATERIALS REFER TO SECTION 4.0 (MATERIALS) LANDSCAPE REFER TO SECTION 5.0 (LANDSCAPE) LIGHTING REFER TO SECTION 6.0 (LIGHTING) SIGNAGE REFER TO SECTION 7.0 (SIGNAGE) OTHER REQUIREMENTS PLAZA AND GATHERING AREA REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SECTION 2.7 PUBLIC ART REQUIREMENT, REFER TO SECTION 2.9 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING34 PERMITTED USES REFER TO CLEAR CREEK CROSSING OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ALL PERMITTED USES SITE PLANNING BUILD-TO STANDARDS ARE NOT REQUIRED ON CLEAR CREEK DRIVE IN PLANNING AREA 4 SETBACKS AND BUILDING ORIENTATION FRONT (ADJ. STREET):15’-0” SIDE (ADJ. STREET):10’-0” REAR (ADJ. STREET):15’-0” MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 80% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 20% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 50’-0” PARKING SURFACE AND/OR STRUCTURE PARKING PER SECTION 2.3.4 (PARKING AND SERVICE) AND SECTION 3.8 (PARKING STRUCTURES) BICYCLE PARKING BICYCLE PARKING PER SECTION 2.4.1 (BICYCLE PARKING)1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 20 AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES, BUT NO LESS THAN 4 SPACES BUILDINGS / ARCHITECTURE REFER TO SECTION 3.0 (BUILDING DESIGN) MATERIALS REFER TO SECTION 4.0 (MATERIALS) LANDSCAPE REFER TO SECTION 5.0 (LANDSCAPE) LIGHTING REFER TO SECTION 6.0 (LIGHTING) SIGNAGE REFER TO SECTION 7.0 (SIGNAGE) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: PLANNING AREA 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: VINEYARD DISTRICT DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 35 SITE PLANNING: VINEYARD DISTRICT FIGURE 1: PLANNING AREAS 3 & 4: ALL ALLOWABLE USES BUILDING ORIENTATION AND SETBACKS ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) PA-3 PA-4 PA-4 CLEAR CREEK DRIVE 40 T H A V E N U E I-70 HOOK RAMPS AT LEAST 30% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG 40TH AVENUE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN THE REQUIRED 0-20 FOOT BUILD-TO AREA 30 % BUILDING, LANDSCAPE OR HARDSCAPE ONLY, NO PARKING ALLOWED AT LEAST 50% OF THE PROPERTY’S FRONTAGE ALONG CLEAR CREEK DRIVE MUST CONTAIN A BUILDING WITHIN 0-20 FEET OF THE PROPERTY LINE 50% FIGURE 2: PLANNING AREAS 3 & 4 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY FRONTAGE ILLUSTRATION (NOT TO SCALE) SETBACK: 5 FEET PER STORY CLEAR CREEK DRIVE40 T H A V E N U E PA-3 PA-4 PA-4 I-70 HOOK RAMPS PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STREET FRONTAGE FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING BUILD-TO REQUIREMENTS SHALL NOT INCLUDE PRIMARY ACCESS DRIVES, AS ILLUSTRATED CLEAR CREEK CROSSING36 HARVEST DISTRICT KEY MAP PLANNING AREA DIAGRAM 2.2.5 PLANNING AREAS 5-7: HARVEST DISTRICT HOMHOMHOMH RESRESIRESI DIDIDI CO HARVEST COMMERCIAL DISTRICT INEINENENEYARDYARDYARDYARDYARD OMMEOMMEMEERCIALRCIALC POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTIVITY(FUTURE PHASE) WAGOWAGOWWAGOWAGOWAGOWWAGOWAANNNNNN OPEN OPEN OPEN OPEN ENOEOPEPESPSPACESPACESPACESPACEACCSPACEAAC DISTRDISTRDISDISTRDISTRDISTSICTCTICTCTCICTICTCT PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 PA 4PA 4PA 4A4AAPA 4PA 4AVVVVVV COCCO MEMEMEESTEASTEASTEASTDDDDD IDIDIDENTIAENTIAENTIALLL ISTRISTRISTRICTICTICT MILLLM OMMEOMMERCIALCIAL DISTRRICTCTT OMMEOMMEMMERCIALCIALRCRDISTRDISTRDISTRSTRTRSICTICTICTICTCTCT HARVEST COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 PA 3PA 3 CCO PA 1P PA 2PA 2PA 2 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 40 T H A V E N U E APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE(PROSPECT RECREATION TIATIATIAIAAL L LLLREREE TITITIIVITYVITYVITYIVITYYPHASE)PHASE)PHASE)SASE) EEEEE YYYYY PPA 8PA 8PA 8A8PA 8A8 ZONING: S(EX ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL(VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) CLEAR CREEK Planning Area 5: Commercial uses including retail, restaurant and hotel on accessible pad sites along Clear Creek Drive. Planning Area 6: Commercial uses including retail, restaurant and entertainment at a highly visible and accessible location adjacent to I-70. Planning Area 7: Commercial uses including retail, restaurant and hotel on accessible pad sites along Clear Creek Drive at the 40th Avenue intersection. Consistent with intent, guidelines and standards set forth for design theme and architecture as well as site elements detailed in the Design Pattern Book. HARVEST PA 5PA 6 PA 7 VEST PA 56 PA 7 HARV PA 6 ZON C R E E K D R I V E PPPAAA 444444444PPPAA 44 RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV EE D RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR R E E EEE KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK DD RR 40 T H A V E N U E VVVVVVIINNNEEEEYYYYYAAAAAAAARRRRRDDDD PPPAAAAA 3333 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 4 0 U U U U U E E E E E E E E U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T 0 0 0 T T T T T T 0 T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N U U U N N N N N N N N N N N U U U U U U U N N N N N N N N N U DDD V EE DDDD T T T T T T T T T T T T E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E A A V V V V V V V V V T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A V V V T T T T T H H H H H H H H H A A A T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T T H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E PUBLIC GATHERING SPACE TRAILHEAD EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL PRIMARY MULTI-USE TRAIL SECONDARY TRAIL P M PUBLIC SIDEWALKP S PLANNING AREA CONNECTIVITY TRAIL CONNECTIONS EXISTING SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION LIMITED MOVEMENT INTERSECTION SS E F I S E F II PROPOSED SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION P F N P F IN INTERNAL ROAD NETWORK CDOT ‘A’ LINE MINOR ACCESS MAJOR ACCESS DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 37 PERMITTED USES REFER TO CLEAR CREEK CROSSING OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ALL PERMITTED USES SITE PLANNING BUILDINGS SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO THE SETBACKS OUTLINED BELOW. BUILD-TO STANDARDS ARE NOT REQUIRED ON CLEAR CREEK DRIVE IN PLANNING AREA 5, 6, OR 7. REFER TO SECTION 2.3.4 FOR FURTHER STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES. WHEN MULTI-FAMILY USES ARE PROPOSED IN THE HARVEST DISTRICT (PA-5, PA- 6, OR PA-7), THE FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENT STAN-DARDS FROM THE HOMESTEAD DISTRICT SHALL APPLY: MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT, PARKING, BICYCLE PARKING, BUILDINGS / ARCHITECTURE, MATERIALS, LANDSCAPE, LIGHTING, SIGNAGE, AND OTHER REQUIREMENTS SETBACKS AND BUILDING ORIENTATION PLANNING AREA 5 • MINIMUM SETBACK IS 5’ PER STORY• WHERE DEVELOPMENT ABUTS A LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE, A 20 FOOT SETBACK LANDSCAPED WITH GRASS AND TREES AND/OR SHRUBS SHALL APPLY PLANNING AREA 6 • BUILDINGS SHALL BE ORIENTED PROXIMATE TO PRIMARY PEDESTRIAN ROUTES WITHIN AND AMONG THE PLANNING AREA, TO BE APPROVED DURING SDP REVIEW• ALONG THE SOUTHERN AND WESTERN PROPERTY LINES OF THE PLANNING AREA, A MINIMUM SETBACK OF 5 FEET PER STORY SHALL APPLY• WHERE DEVELOPMENT ABUTS A LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USE, A 20 FOOT SETBACK LANDSCAPED WITH GRASS AND TREES AND/OR SHRUBS SHALL APPLY PLANNING AREA 7: • MINIMUM SETBACK OF 5 FEET PER STORY SHALL APPLY MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 80% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 20% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 65’-0” PARKING SURFACE AND/OR STRUCTURE PARKING PER SECTION 2.3.4 (PARKING AND SERVICE) AND SECTION 3.8 (PARKING STRUCTURES) BICYCLE PARKING BICYCLE PARKING PER SECTION 2.4.1 (BICYCLE PARKING)1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 20 AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES, BUT NO LESS THAN 4 SPACES BUILDINGS / ARCHITECTURE REFER TO SECTION 3.0 (BUILDING DESIGN) MATERIALS REFER TO SECTION 4.0 (MATERIALS) LANDSCAPE REFER TO SECTION 5.0 (LANDSCAPE) LIGHTING REFER TO SECTION 6.0 (LIGHTING) SIGNAGE REFER TO SECTION 7.0 (SIGNAGE) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: HARVEST DISTRICT CLEAR CREEK CROSSING38 2.2.6 PLANNING AREAS 8: WAGON DISTRICT POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTIVITY(FUTURE PHASE) WAGON OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PA 5PAPA 5A 5PA 5PAA5 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 40 T H A V E N U E APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE(PROSPECT RECREATION PHASE)PHASE)ASE)ASE) PA 8 ZONING: S(EX ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL(VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) HOHOMHOMHHHHHHHH RESIRESI DIDIDII COCO IINEININEEININNYARDARDYARDDDYARDDYARA OMMEOMMOMMEMOMMOMOMEMERCIALIACIARCIAACCIA PAPPA 4PAPAPA 4444VVVVVVVV COCOCOCOCOCCCO HHARVHARVHAHARVHAHARVAESTESTESTSTTTST COMMECOMMEMMECOMOMMMMRCIRCIALIALAAA DISTRDISTRDISTRDISTRDISTISDISSTRICTICTTICTICICTC OOMMEOOORCIALCCIDISTRTRTRTRTRTRDISTRRICTICTICICTICTCTCCIC MEMEMESTEASTEAEADDDD IDDIDENTIAENTTIALL ISTRISIRIICTICTC MILLMILLMILL OMMEOMMEMRCIALRCIALC DISTRDISTRISTICTICTCT PA 6PA 6PA 6PA 6 PA 7PA 7PA 7PA7A 7A 7PA 7 PA PA PA 3PAA3PAPAAA COCOCOCCCO PA 1PA 1P PA 2PA 2PA 2 POTENTPOTENTPOTENTPOTEOTENTFUTURFUTURFUTFUTURFU CONNECTCONNECTONNECCONNECTCC(FUTUR(FUTUR(FUTURE(FUTURE(FUTUREEPPHPHP WAGON OPEN SPACE DISTRICT C LLLLL EE AAAAAA RRR CCCCCC RRRRR EEEEEE EEE KKK DDD RRRR III VVVVVV EEE EN U U U U EN U U EN U NU U NU EN U U EN N EN E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U U EN U U U U EN U U EN U U U U U N EN N N N EN EN E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E U U U EN U U U U EN EN N EN E E E E E E E E EN U E AV E AV E AV AV A 40 T H 40 T H 40 T H TH T 40 4 4 A A A AV E AV E AV E E AV E E VE E E VE AV E VE V V V V V V V AV AV A A A A A 40 T H 40 T H 40 T H H 40 T H TH H H H H H H TH T 40 T T 40 T T 40 T T 0T 0 0 0 40 0 0 40 40 4 4 A A A A A A A A E E E E VE AV E AV E V V V V AV AV V V AV A A A H TH H H H H H T T 0 A A A 40 T H AV E APPLEWOOAPPLEWOOAPPLEWOOAPPLEWOOOOOAPPLEWAPPLEWAPPLEWOOAPPLEWAPPLEWPPLEWPLEWDGOLFCD GOLF CDGOLFCD GOLF CD GOLF CGOLD GOLF CGGOURSEOOURSEOURSEOURSE TIATIATIAIAAL L LLLREREE TITITIIVITYVITYVITYIVITYYPHASE)PHASE)PHASE)S E YYYYY PA 8 ZOZONING: ZONING: ZONINGZONINGZONING:ONING:G:: ONIONINGZONGZN PDPPD PD PDCOMMERCCOCOMMCOOCOMMERCMMEROMMERCMMERCCCICOMORCCIICOMMERCRALALALLLLL(VACAN(VACA(VACANVACANVACANVACANANTVACANCAN(VACANTT)NT)T)NNTVA(VACANT ZONINGZONINGZONINGZONINGZONIG: G: G: G: PD PD PD PDPPCOMMECOMMERCOMMERCOMMERCOMMMERCIRCIRCICIALALALALAL (VAC(VA(VACANVAN(VACAN(VACANACANA(VACANAANNT)NT)NT)NT)NNT) CLEAR CREEK Multi-use trail, open space and water storage land uses, connected by a pedestrian network that links to the Clear Creek Regional Trail. Consistent with intent, guidelines and standards set forth for design theme and architecture as well as site elements detailed in the Design Pattern Book. WAGON DISTRICT KEY MAP MULTI-USE TRAIL NEIGHBORHOOD TRAIL CONNECTION EXISTING POND EXISTING TREES MULTI-USE TRAIL DRAINAGE SWALE CROSSING EXISTING DRAINAGE SWALE PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED RETAIL (HARVEST DISTRICT) EXISTING RESIDENTIAL TRAIL CORRIDOR CROSS-SECTION RETAIL CONNECTION FUTURE CONNECTION TO PROSPECT DISTRICT BY OTHERS Note: Both of the above trail alignment and amenity graphics are conceptual in nature and subject to change pursuant to future approvals by the City of Wheat Ridge SHADE STRUCTURE PARKING REGIONAL WATER QUALITY EXISTING POND CLEAR CREEK CLEA R C R E E K D R I V E 10’ MULTI-USE TRAIL EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL EXISTING TREES 6’ SIDEWALK PARALLEL PARKING BIKE RACK & MAP KIOSK SIGN KIOSK CONNECTION TO CLEAR CREEK TRAIL MULTI-USE TRAIL PROPOSED RETAIL PARKING TRAIL MARKER TRAIL CORRIDOR CROSS-SECTION DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 39 PERMITTED USES REFER TO CLEAR CREEK CROSSING OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT FOR ALL PERMITTED USES SETBACKS 10’-0” FROM ALL PROPERTY LINES BUILDING ORIENTATION N/A MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE 20% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIRED 80% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35’-0” UPPER STORY STEPBACKS N/A OPEN SPACE REFER TO SECTION 2.8 (OPEN SPACE AND VIEWS) TRAILS AND SIDEWALKS INTERCONNECTED SYSTEM INCLUDES SIDEWALKS, BIKE PATHS, MULTI-USE TRAILS AND TRAIL HEADS. CIRCULATION DESIGN PER SECTION 2.3.1 (PUBLIC TRAILS, SIDEWALKS AND BIKE LANES) AND TRAIL AMENITIES PER SECTION 5.6 (TRAIL FURNISHINGS). PARKING SURFACE PARKING LOT AND STREET PARKING SHALL SERVE THE CLEAR CREEK TRAIL AT THE CLEAR CREEK DRIVE CUL-DE-SAC TERMINATION, PER SECTION 2.2.3 (PUBLIC STREET SECTIONS). ALL PARKING SHALL MEET THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE STANDARDS, CHAPTER 26, ARTICLE V, SEC. 26-501 BICYCLE PARKING BICYCLE PARKING PER SECTION 2.4.1 (BICYCLE PARKING) AND SECTION 5.6 (TRAIL FURNISHING)1 BICYCLE SPACE PER EVERY 20 AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES, BUT NO LESS THAN 4 SPACES BUILDINGS / ARCHITECTURE REFER TO SECTION 3.0 (BUILDING DESIGN) MATERIALS REFER TO SECTION 4.0 (MATERIALS) LANDSCAPE REFER TO SECTION 5.0 (LANDSCAPE) LIGHTING REFER TO SECTION 6.0 (LIGHTING) SIGNAGE REFER TO SECTION 7.0 (SIGNAGE) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: WAGON DISTRICT CLEAR CREEK CROSSING40 2.3 Streets Access to the surrounding thoroughfares will provide multiple opportunities to enter the development including connections planned for the Project density and trips produced. Four access points are planned to accommodate the development, including a direct access to and from Interstate 70 through the use of planned hook ramps, a 40th Avenue underpass connection to Youngf eld Road, a connection to the south to 32nd Avenue and a future extension of Clear Creek Drive to the north of Clear Creek Crossing and connecting with Highway 58. There are two primary streets within Clear Creek Crossing, both extending and connecting to existing streets adjacent to the Site. Clear Creek Drive is a planned four-lane street with a dedicated turning lane extending southerly to its alignment with the existing Youngf eld Service Rd, where it connects to 32nd Ave at a signalized intersection, just west of the existing I-70 freeway bridge. To the north, Clear Creek Drive will cross a planned signalized intersection with the planned I-70 ramps, aligned at approximately 38th Ave, after which the collector street will cross the Site diagonally to the northwest, intersecting with 40th Ave. Clear Creek Drive will terminate near the northwest boundary of the Site in a cul-de-sac near a planned trailhead and trail, which will connect to the existing Clear Creek Regional Trail, along the creek. A future phase of the development to the north and west future phase eventually will extend the street beyond the cul-de-sac to its proposed connection with Hwy 58. The other planned primary street which runs east/west within the Site, 40th Avenue is a two-lane street with a dedicated turning lane aligned to connect to existing 40th Ave, just east of the Site boundary at its intersection with Youngf eld Service Rd. The existing 40th Ave is also a two-lane street with a dedicated turning lane, extending westerly, under the I-70 40th Ave bridge where the street intersects and terminates at Youngf eld Rd. The Project will require a variety of intersection types and design to enhance safety and connectivity throughout the site. Within Clear Creek Crossing, there are four signalized full movement (primary) intersections and f ve additional full movement and two limited movement intersections at various planned drive locations, primarily along Clear Creek Dr. Treatments of the planned primary intersections, including the I-70 ramp entrance to Clear Creek Dr, as well as the 40th Ave and Clear Creek Dr intersection may utilize design enhancements to include, raised crosswalks, change in pavement pattern and/or materials and additional signage. 41DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 2. 3 S t r e e t M a p ZO N I N G : S F R E S I D E N T I A L (E X I S T I N G ) CO O R S ’ W A T E R S T O R A G E MA P L E G R O V E EL E M E N T A R Y SC H O O L PL A N N E D I - 7 0 HO O K R A M P S PA 1 PA 2 PA 3 PA 4 P A 4 PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 ZO N I N G : IN D U S T R I A L (E X I S T I N G ) YO U N G F I E L D S T R E E T W 3 2 N D A V E N U E RA I L R O A D TR A I L H E A D EN L A R G E M E N T C L E A R C R E E K D R IV E PA R K I N G TR A I L H E A D MU L T I - U S E T R A I L AP P L E W O O D G O L F C O U R S E (P R O S P E C T R E C R E A T I O N & P A R K D I S T R I C T ) PO T E N T I A L FU T U R E CO N N E C T I V I T Y (F U T U R E P H A S E ) PA 8 ZO N I ZO N I ON I ON I ON I ON I ZO N I NI ZO N I NI NI NI NI N N N N N N ZO N ZO N ZO N O Z Z NG : NG : NG : NG : NG : NG : G: NG :G: NG :G:G G G G G N N N R SF R R SF R SF R SF R SF R SF R R R R R R R R R SF R FR R F F SF F SF SF S ES I D ES I D ES I D ES I D ES I D ES I D ES I D ES I D ES I D D SI ES I SI SI I I SI SI SI SI SI ES I S S S S ES S S S S S S S S S E E E E EN T I EN T I EN T I EN T I EN T I EN T I EN T I EN T I EN T I EN T I T NT NT NT T EN T NT EN EN N N E E E AL AL L AL AL AL L L L L A A A A A A A A A A XI EX I (E X I (E X I (E X I (E X I (E X I EX I I (E X I XI (E X I X (E X (E X EX EX X (((( IN IN N N IN N N N N TI N N TI N N ST I N ST I N N TI N N ST I N N ST I N ST I N ST I ST I TI ST T T T T T T T T T ST S S S G)G)G)G))G)G))G)G)G)G))G G G G G G G G G G PA 1 PA 2 PA 5 PA 6 P A 7 PA 3 AI AI AI I AI LH LH LH L L TR A I L H E A D E N L A R G E M E N T RE G I O N A L WA T E R QU A L I T Y ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E CL E A R C R E E K 4 0 T H A V E N U E PA 4 4 PA 4 4 PA 4 A 4 0 N U 0 N U 0 T T 0 T N N N N N N N N N N T T 0 T N N N N N N N T T 0 T T T E N E N N N N N E N N N N E E E N N T T E N E N N N N N N N E N T T V E E E E E E E V E V V V E V V V V V V E V V V V V E E A A A A A H H H H H H H H A A A H A A A A A A A H A A A A H H H H H V V V V V V V V V E E E E E E E V E E E E V E E E E E E V V V V V V V V V V V A H H A H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A H H H H H H H A A A A A H H H H H A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V E E E E E V E V V V E V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V E E V V E E V V V A A A A A A A A H H H H H H H H H H A H A A H A A A H A A A A A H A H A A A H H V V V V V V A A A A A V V V V V V EX I S T I N G S I G N A L I Z E D FU L L M O V E M E N T IN T E R S E C T I O N FU L L M O V E M E N T IN T E R S E C T I O N LIM I T E D M O V E M E N T IN T E R S E C T I O N AC C E S S D R I V E PR O P O S E D S I G N A L I Z E D FU L L M O V E M E N T IN T E R S E C T I O N IN T E R N A L R O A D NE T W O R K CD O T ‘ A ’ L I N E NO R T H CLEAR CREEK CROSSING42 2.3.1 Public Street Design and Circulation DESIGN INTENT • Introduce a street and sidewalk pattern, orientation, and hierarchy that encourages walkability between and through the Districts. • Design and construct streets that support a multi-modal environment, including vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle traff c. • The streetscape treatments should be an element that provides continuity throughout the Project. • Maintain pedestrian safety at primary intersections within the Project. • Signage on streets should be a cohesive design element that clearly identif es the Project and its users from the streets DESIGN STANDARDS • Ensure clear sight lines are maintained at public street intersections to provide for vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle safety. • Public street design shall follow the appropriate street section templates included in 2.3.3 Public Street Sections in this document. • Clear lane marking and signs for bicycle and vehicle travel shall be maintained throughout the Project’s public streets. • Vehicle access driveways on public streets shall meet the following requirements: • No vehicle access driveways may be closer than twenty-f ve (25) feet to any property line except when used for joint access for two (2) or more parcels within a planning area. Flexibility in this requirement is allowed should the Planning Areas be further subdivided in the future. • Vehicle access drives on the same parcel shall be spaced at not less than 100’ intervals. • Curb cuts in commercial districts shall not be more than 35’ in width when serving an individual parcel and shall not in any instance be less than 20’. • All curb cuts and driveways shall be not less than 10 degrees off perpendicular to the street it serves. • Any potential vehicular traff c conf icts with users of multi-use trails shall be minimized. • Tree lawns (area between sidewalk and street) shall be landscaped with street trees and sod, or in lieu of sod a combination of shrubs, ornamental grasses, and perennials. • Street tree selection and planting design along public streets shall be designed to unify the project through consistent application of landscape patterns. • Landscape design within tree lawns shall not interfere with walkability, accessibility, or safety along public streets. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Shared curb cuts and driveways are encouraged between multiple parcels. Where access points are shared or where adherence to these standards would leave a parcel without vehicular access, curb cut setback or spacing requirements may be adjusted. • Use of wayf nding signage to communicate access to trail connection amenities is highly encouraged. Provide wayf nding signage at key locations along public streets. • Use of enhanced paving crosswalks or other alternative methods of making pedestrian travel for clarity and safety is highly encouraged. • Landscape islands with pedestrian walkways may be incorporated at street intersections, amenity spaces, or building entrances creating clear separation from vehicular and pedestrian circulation. Vehicular, Pedestrian and Bicycle Network Landscaped streetscape Enhanced paving at crosswalks DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 43 DESIGN GUIDELINES • Specialty intersection treatments are encouraged to support pedestrian traff c. • Throughout the Project the streets should be visually cohesive through the use of similar or complementary streetscape elements, hardscape treatments and planting. • Street trees should be selected to create a continuous canopy at maturity allowing 30’ spacing where available. • A specialty paving system or pattern, with or without a change in material is encouraged at primary street intersections with the Walking Zone. • Signage on streets should be a cohesive design element that clearly identif es the Project and its users from the streets. 2.3.2 Private Street Design and Circulation DESIGN INTENT • Assure through internal streets that traff c is dispersed eff ciently and safely providing ease of entry to the Project, as well as exit from the various Districts. • Establish logical, safe and attractive connections to and throughout the development. • At Project’s vehicular entry points, provide clear separation from bicycles and pedestrians. • Minimize conf icts between vehicles and pedestrians by limiting curb cuts along pedestrian centric streets. • Encourage site access drives that promote effective circulation among adjacent parcels within the Project. DESIGN STANDARDS • Internal streets shall include a Pedestrian Walking Zone (sidewalk) and an Amenity Zone. • Pedestrian walking zones shall be unobstructed and clear along all streets. Private zones should connect to adjacent streets and Walking Zones through a combination of concrete w/ pattern, texture, or concrete pavers. • The Amenity Zone shall be a minimum of six ft. (6’) wide and contain trees, pedestrian lighting, streetscape elements, wayf nding, signage, and furnishings to maintain Project continuity . • Pedestrian Walking Zones and bicycle lanes shall prioritize safety in design, particularly in areas near the planned I-70 ramps. • The branching height of mature trees shall be a minimum of eight (8’) feet in height for unobstructed Walking Zones. • Walking Zones shall be organized to create a continuity of walkable areas throughout the Project. Pedestrian walking zone Landscaped amenity zone Landscaping to enhance pedestrian zones 44 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING 2. 3 . 3 P u b l i c S t r e e t S e c t i o n P r o p o s e d A c c e s s P o i n t NO R T H DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 45 2.3.3 Public Street Sections (cont.) CLEAR CREEK CROSSING46 2.3.3 Public Street Sections (cont.) DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 47 2.3.4 Conceptual Private Street Section The above conceptual private street section is intended to provide an idea of the spatial feel of the internal private drives. Actual internal access drives will be proposed, reviewed and approved by the City of Wheat Ridge at the time of the Specif c Development Plan. The above graphic demonstrates two street section instances, the left demonstrating a street abutting a parking f eld primarily applicable to the Harvest and Mill Districts and the right side of the section demonstrating a more pedestrian oriented section likely to be proposed in the Vineyard District. 48 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING 2.4 Pedestrian Connectivity A major component of Clear Creek Crossing is pedestrian connectivity, both internal to the site, as well as externally to existing adjacent neighborhoods and the Clear Creek Trail. This connectivity is intended to serve the needs of the community encouraging use of the trail. Access to the Clear Creek Trail will be of importance in site planning efforts for the Development, as Clear Creek and its associated trail not only drives the design inspiration of Clear Creek Crossing, but also provides a regional connection to the community that should be celebrated. Special emphasis placed on quality and functionality of the pedestrian environment improves social interaction, connects the existing fabric of the adjacent neighborhood and encourages travel from destination to destination within the larger community without the use of a motor vehicle. 49DESIGN PATTERN BOOK ZO N I N G : S F R E S I D E N T I A L (E X I S T I N G ) ZO N I N G : IN D U S T R I A L (E X I S T I N G ) CO O R S ’ W A T E R S T O R A G E MA P L E G R O V E EL E M E N T A R Y SC H O O L PA 1 PA 2 PA 3 PA 4 PA 5 PA 6 RA I L R O A D YO U N G F I E L D S T R E E T W 3 2 N D A V E N U E AP P L E W O O D G O L F C O U R S E (P R O S P E C T R E C R E A T I O N & P A R K D I S T R I C T ) PA 7 PA 8 R E G I O N A L W A T E R Q U A L I T Y ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) 4 0 T H A V E . PA 4 R E G I R E G I R E G O N A L O N A L O N A L O N A L N A L L A L L W A T T W A T W A T W A T A T A T T E R E R E R E D D D D D D D AL L AL AL AL A )))) PA 4 PA 3 PA P P P P 4 PA 5 PA 6 PA 4 PE D E S T R I A N C R O S S I N G E N L A R G E M E N T PO T E N T I A L FU T U R E R O A D CO N N E C T I V I T Y (F U T U R E P H A S E ) G E N L A R G E M E N T NT CL E A R C R E E K D R I V E I- 7 0 H O O K R A M P PE D E S T R I A N C R O S S I N G PU B L I C S I D E W A L K PA - 4 FU L L I N T E R S E C T I O N PA - 4 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E V E N U E PE D E S T R I A N C R O S S I N G EN L A R G E M E N T CL E A R C R E E K R R R R C L E A R C R E E K D R I V P V E V E V E . V E . V E PA 1 0 T 0 T H A H A V V 0 T 0 T H A H A V V A V P PA 1 AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P L AP P AP P AP P P AP A EW O O EW O O EW O O WO O O O O W EW W EW EW EW EW D G O D G O D G O D G O DG O GO DG O G G G D LF C LF C LF C LF C LF C OU R S OU R S UR S OU R S OU R S O E E E E G:G: NG : : NG : :G: NG : NG NG G NG G PD PD PD PD P P P CI CI CI C C C RC RC ER C RC ER C ER C ER C ER ER R R R R L L AL AL AL AL AL C C C C C C C C NT ) NT ) NT ) )T) NT N N AN N AN AN AN AN AN A A A A A APA 7 R E G I R E G I R E R O N A L O N A L O N A L N W A T W A T W A T W A W A W T R E R E R E R R R R Q U A L Q U A L Q U A L U Q Y I T Y I T Y I T Y Y I T Y Y ZO N I ZO N I ZO N I ON I ZO N I ZO N I ON ZO ZO O O ZO N N N N N N CO M M CO M M CO M M CO M M MM MM CO M M CO M M CO M M M CO O O O O O O O CO E E E E (V A C (V A C (V A C (V A C (V A C VA C (V A C C (V A C VA C VA C VA ( R E G I R E G I R E G I E O N A L O N A L O N A W A T W A T W A T A A W W A W R E R E R E R Q U A L Q U A L Q U A L Q Q Q U A L A L L A L A T Y T Y I T Y I T Y I T Y I T Y Y P PA R R R A 2 L L E E A A R R R C C R R E E E E E E E E E E E E K K D D R R I I V V C C L L L L E A 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 E E E E E E E E 4 C C C C4 C C C C C C C C C R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R R E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E PU B L I C G A T H E R I N G SP A C E TR A I L H E A D EX I S T I N G C L E A R CR E E K T R A I L PR I M A R Y MU L T I - U S E T R A I L SE C O N D A R Y T R A I L P P P M M M PU B L I C S I D E W A L K P P P P P P P P P PSSSS PL A N N I N G A R E A CO N N E C T I V I T Y TR A I L C O N N E C T I O N S SI G N A L 2. 4 . 1 P e d e s t r i a n C o n n e c t i v i t y M a p NO R T H CLEAR CREEK CROSSING50 2.4.2 Public Trails, Sidewalks & Bike Lanes DESIGN INTENT • Provide entry points to the Project for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians. • Create a vibrant streetscape environment that focuses on the pedestrian and complements the vision for a walkable, mixed-use planned development. • Provide clear paths of travel for bicyclists, pedestrians, and vehicles with designated areas of travel to minimize conf icts. • Encourage a safe and convenient pedestrian and bicyclist experience at the Project, maintaining safety as the highest priority. • Provide direct and comfortable pedestrian connections between developed uses and publicly accessible open space including Clear Creek Trail and plazas within the Project. • Incorporate a public amenity zone with enhanced streetscape amenities including street trees, plantings, benches, and pedestrian lighting that form a cohesive image for the Project. DESIGN STANDARDS • Vehicular access shall be designed to minimize any conf icts between streets and primary pedestrian or bicycle access at the Project. • Detached sidewalks with tree lawns (which shall include street trees) or attached sidewalks with Amenity Zones (which shall include street trees in cut-outs) between the curb and walking zone shall be provided. • Streets, pedestrian networks and bike routes shall be connected to the existing development in the surrounding area. • Sidewalks shall be at least six (6’) feet wide and the Amenity Zone shall be at least six (6’) feet wide. • A system of pedestrian sidewalks shall be provided and designed to provide direct access and convenient connections to and between the following: • All site amenities or publicly accessible open spaces and plazas. • Public and private sidewalks on adjacent properties that extend to adjoining land uses, developments, and public facilities such as parks, green-ways, schools, recreational facilities and public off ce buildings. • Pedestrian lighting shall be provided on streets that are considered major pedestrian environments within the Project. At plaza and trail locations, site amenities shall support the pedestrian and cyclist experience, providing adequate and convenient facilities. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Primary intersections may be set apart with aesthetic design elements that mirror the signif cance of the signalized full movement. • Landscape should consider its purpose as a visual cue and unifying element. Landscape in the Amenity Zones should not impede circulation for any of the modes of travel through the Project. • Where possible, private amenity zones should be utilized to provide additional pedestrian amenities, such as benches or planters. Additional seating areas within the streetscape, especially near corners and areas with high pedestrian traff c, are encouraged. Comfortable and direct connections Multi-Use trail Multi-modal connections DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 51 2.4.3 Pedestrian Access & Circulation DESIGN INTENT • Create an inviting environment that has clear circulation paths from parking areas to building entries. • Provide accessibility for pedestrians to safely navigate within Districts as well as between them. • Provide clear, visually interesting accessible routes for pedestrians to navigate through the mid-points of blocks and intersections. • Provide direct and comfortable pedestrian connections between developed uses and publicly accessible open space including Clear Creek Trail and plazas within the Project. DESIGN STANDARDS • An on-site system of pedestrian walkways shall be provided and designed to provide direct access and convenient connections to and between the following: • Primary entrances to each primary building, including pad site buildings; • All surface parking areas or parking structures; • Nearby site amenities. • Walkways must be clear of low branches, vegetation and similar impediments. • Areas within the Project where the pedestrian walkway crosses a parking area or internal street, the walkway shall be clearly differentiated through a change in color or material. • Pedestrian walkways shall be continued across driveways and drive aisles in parking lots. • Where walkways occur along a building facade, the required walkway must be clear of door swings, exterior display areas, shopping cart storage, and similar impediments. DESIGN GUIDELINES • The number of curb cuts should be minimized to the extent possible and be shared between uses and parking areas except in retail. • Drop off areas for specif c uses such as hotels, employment, and residential areas may be allowed when deemed appropriate and not in conf ict with the general pedestrian and vehicular traff c patterns. • Connections between pedestrian walking zones and multi-use trails are encouraged. • Design of pedestrian elements should be cohesive throughout the Project, serving as a visual connector between the Districts. Clear walkways along building facade Material change at walkways Pedestrian connections CLEAR CREEK CROSSING52 2.5 Parking and Service DESIGN STANDARDS • Parking requirements by use are set forth in the Development Standards Table in Section 1.7 of this document. • When a parking lot or loading area is placed between the public right-of-way and a building, or adjacent to existing residential uses, view-obscuring screening shall be established between the ROW or residential use and the parking area and composed of live plantings, berms, or walls, or a combination thereof. The height of the screening shall be subject to the sight distance triangle requirements. • Drive-through lanes are allowed within a “build-to” area as long as lane(s) is (are) screened with 3’ tall landscaping, berming, and/or wall. • Landscaped islands and/or medians are required in larger parking areas to minimize the aesthetic impacts of large, uninterrupted parking areas. Large areas of surface parking shall be divided by landscaped medians, accordingly: • All parking areas in excess of twenty-f ve (25) spaces shall have at least one (1) interior landscaped island per twenty-f ve (25) spaces. For double bay parking this space may be reduced to one parking lot island per thirteen (13) double bay parking spaces. • Each such landscaped island shall occupy the equivalent of one (1) parking space (minimum) and each such required island shall be landscaped with a minimum of one (1) two-inch caliper tree or larger and four (4) shrubs or accepted groundcover. • Parking lot islands shall be irrigated with an automated sprinkler and have raised concrete curbs. • No landscaping within landscaped islands may obstruct visibility for vehicles entering, maneuvering in, or exiting the parking lot. • Parking lots over 400 spaces shall be broken up into smaller lots with landscaped pedestrian paths leading to primary building entrances. • Stacking for drive-through facilities shall not be located directly adjacent to existing residential uses. • Multifamily parking shall not be placed within the minimum frontyard setback. Where the sideyard or rearyard setback is adjacent to a public street, a landscape buffer of at least 10 feet is required. DESIGN INTENT • Promote a walkable, pedestrian-friendly site with minimizing visual impact of parking areas. • Encourage a visually appealing appearance of surface parking areas while maintaining adequate facilities to serve various uses within the Project. • Consider shared parking as a way to promote connectivity through the Project. • Accommodate and encourage multi-modal transportation usage which may reduce parking through parking reductions. • Provide adequate lighting levels to create a safe, secure environment while limiting negative impacts on adjacent properties. Landscaped Parking Islands Landscaped Parking Islands DESIGN GUIDELINES • The visibility of parking from the street should be minimized. • Shared parking between users is encouraged. • The use of perimeter walls, berms, landscaping, or placement of buildings may be used to reduce the visual impact of parking areas. • Parking Structures are encouraged where appropriate and cost effective within the development to help manage large expanses of parking lots as well as to encourage effective pedestrian connectivity within the Project. • In order to minimize large expanses of parking, interior landscaped pedestrian paths are suggested to break up large lots and provide safe pedestrian connection to the primary building entrances. • Minimize surface parking where possible through the use of Shared Parking and Parking Reductions as outlined in 26-501. Aggregate LandscapingLandscaped Parking Islands DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 53 2.6 Bicycle Parking DESIGN INTENT • Accommodate and encourage multi-modal transportation usage which may reduce parking lot sizes overall through parking reductions. • Provide adequate bicycle parking facilities to encourage cycling as a viable transportation mode for visitors and residents of the Project. • Encourage the connection between Clear Creek Trail and the Project by providing conveniently located bicycle parking in all Districts. • Maintain safety for cyclists through thoughtful location of bicycle parking facilities. DESIGN STANDARDS • Bicycle parking requirements by use are set forth in the Development Standards Table on Page 12 of this document. • The required bicycle rack is the “inverted U” type and shall count as two (2) bicycle spaces. Other types of bicycle racks may be approved by the community development director • Parking for bicycles shall be provided on site and shall be well-lit areas as near to the building or facility entrance as possible but not more than f fty (50) feet away. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Bicycle parking should be encouraged near RTD bus stops to facilitate multi-modal transportation. • Bicycle parking facilities should be safely accessible from streets and multi-use trails. • Where possible, bicycle parking areas should utilize already existing weather protected areas such as building overhangs. • Bicycle parking facilities should include provisions for storage and locking of bicycles in secure racks, or equivalent installation, in which the user may lock both the bicycle frame and wheels to the rack. Bicycle parking Bicycle parking Bicycle parking CLEAR CREEK CROSSING54 2.7 Service & Loading Areas DESIGN INTENT • Minimize visibility and impact of service areas by locating parking and service access away from primary building access points, and pedestrian activity areas, providing screening as necessary. • Eliminate conf icts between service areas, on-site vehicular circulation and pedestrian connections. • Provide clean, safe and functional service areas behind buildings. DESIGN STANDARDS • Loading shall not occur from any public street, major interior drive, nor occupy or intrude into any f re lane or required parking spaces. Where possible, loading docks must be located on the site so as not to be viewed from major roads, access ways, or residentially zoned property. • On-site loading shall not be located near pedestrian-use areas such as sidewalks, plazas, or open spaces. • Service and delivery activities shall be separated from primary building access points and shall be screened from the public view and avoided along the street. • Suff cient loading and maneuvering space shall be provided for trucks and other service vehicles. • Locate service areas and associated equipment (i.e. dumpsters, loading docks) away from residential zones, to limit smell and visual disturbance. • Service areas that are visible from public/private streets will be screened from view with walls matching the architectural character of the building to which it is attached, or through extensive landscaping. • 8’-0” Max. height for screen wall. • Trash dumpsters shall be shielded from view by solid screen walls with a gate or door at least 6’-0” in height, creating a trash enclosure. • Trash dumpsters may not project above the trash enclosure. • Trash enclosures may not be located within f ve feet of windows, doors, combustible walls or roof eaves. • Trash enclosures may not be located between the building and street unless screened from visibility. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Combining multi-tenant trash receptacles and service areas is encouraged to maximize operations eff ciency and minimize obstacles in pedestrian zones. • Screen walls and trash enclosures should be similar in design and materials within the various Planning Areas. Trash enclosure screening Minimize visibility of service areas Solid screening DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 55 2.8 Fencing & Screening DESIGN INTENT • Minimize the visual presence of off-street service functions, such as deliveries and refuse pick up, by locating service areas away from primary public points. • Screen or buffer service areas, refuse containers and mechanical/utility equipment from views from streets, open spaces and adjacent properties. • Provide security for private and common spaces not open to the general public. DESIGN STANDARDS • Service and delivery facilities and utility appurtenances such as gas meters, transformers, and switch gear shall be separated from the primary public building entries and shall be screened if visible from the public right-of-way. • All fencing must exhibit a high quality design and construction ref ecting the architectural character, color and material of the building or buildings to which it is attached or directly related. • Screening enclosures for refuse container and service areas shall be consistent with building architecture and shall utilize similar materials. • Screen walls and fences shall be a minimum of one foot higher than the object being screened, but not more than eight feet high on all sides where access is not needed. • An opaque metal gate shall be included where required for complete screening. • All fences and railings must be securely fastened in place in pavement or footings. • Pool enclosure fence = 60” minimum height. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Where topography or building forms create special conditions, screen wall height, and / or location requirements may be modif ed. • Where building form or architecture suggests that ancillary structures or walls contrast with the primary building, fences and screen walls may differ in design and materials from the primary building. • Fencing may be combined with low walls for enhanced design. • When possible, equipment screens should be placed back from building edges so as to not negatively affect building mass and scale. • Fencing and walls in the commercial, retail and high density residential areas of Clear Creek Crossing should be as minimal as possible. • The height of fences and walls may vary depending on the purpose and location. Where pedestrian access needs to be limited, a fence or wall as high as 4 feet may be used. Where a parking lot screen is required, the fences or walls may be as low as 3 feet. Where a fence, wall or railing provides a safe barrier between severe grade changes, a minimum height of 42 inches must be provided. Screen Wall Screen Wall Site Fencing Screen Wall CLEAR CREEK CROSSING56 2.9 Walls DESIGN INTENT • Walls, particularly in visible areas, will incorporate or give the appearance of f eld stone and natural stone to create an agrarian feel. • Wall design, particularly in areas adjacent to ROW, should incorporate color and materials to complement the architecture and provide a unifying element throughout the Project. • Wall types will vary depending on visibility from the R.O.W. • Highly visible walls in pedestrian areas should be designed with materials for the pedestrian scale. DESIGN STANDARDS • Walls shall meet City of Wheat Ridge minimum standards as ref ected in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. • Large retaining walls where hidden from view can be MSE type walls. • Incorporate tiering of walls where possible and provide planting area between tiered wall partitions. • Select materials for high quality and durability. • Where segmental block walls are used, the masonry units shall have multiple sizes, textures, or a randomized pattern to add interest. • Provide blended color throughout block selection to be visually appealing. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Emphasize raw material in gathering areas. May include board formed concrete or gabion type walls. • Utilize landscape design to screen retaining walls where visible from the ROW. • Walls visible from the R.O.W. should have an enhanced f nish similar to f eld stone or natural stone and may include faux stone products. GabionBoard Form Segment Block MSE Natural Stone DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 57 2.10 Plaza & Gathering Areas DESIGN INTENT • Provide spaces that are open and inviting to the public, which serve as areas for relaxation and community interaction, and create variety and interest in the public realm. • Allow for spaces adjacent to building and public rights-of-way than can accommodate special amenities such as café seating, public art, water features, and planters. • Design spaces that can accommodate high levels of pedestrian use. • Create a comfortable night ambiance in publicly accessible open space and plazas utilizing adequate light levels to achieve safety and eff cient wayf nding. • Provide multi-functional spaces that can accommodate special events and functions. DESIGN STANDARDS • Plaza/gathering areas shall be required in PA1, PA3, and PA6 only. • Plaza/gathering areas shall provide a minimum of 5,000 square feet within each Planning Area; designated plaza/gathering areas may be divided into up to f ve (5) non-contiguous locations within each Planning Area, as required. • Locate plazas and gathering areas for high visibility and public safety. • Each plaza shall provide at least one (1) tree for every 1000 square feet of plaza area. • A minimum of 15% of the plaza shall be composed of planting materials (grass, ground covers, planting beds, etc.) • Deciduous shade trees shall be provided near seating areas. • Lighting shall be designed to illuminate pedestrian pathways and provide for human safety and security. • Paving materials shall incorporate colored, patterned or decorative concrete, crusher f nes, brick or stone pavers, exposed aggregates and/or other decorative f nish elements. • At least two of each of the following design elements shall be incorporated in the Homestead, Mill, Vineyard and Harvest Districts: • Plazas or courtyards that contain open eating areas, landscaping, and/or fountains. Where possible, buildings should be placed to enclose these spaces on three sides. These areas shall count toward the minimum required landscaped area established in Chapter 26 of the Code of Laws. • Pedestrian activities such as seating areas, arcades, bike racks, benches and seat walls should be placed on site, close to building entrances. • For multi-family residential properties, open space shall incorporate amenities for play or congregation. Acceptable amenities include play structures, picnic tables, benches, community gardens, doggie yard or sporting area/f elds. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Design of plazas should take into consideration ease of maintenance and snow removal. • Paving/hardscape should be considered as the primary surface treatment, with landscaping and or turf as secondary surface treatments. • Where possible, permeable paving or landscaping should be used to reduce water run off on site. • Trash receptacles should not be placed immediately adjacent to benches or other seating areas. • Other amenities, such as water features, public art, power outlets, and drinking fountains, should be incorporated into a plaza. • Plaza standards may be modif ed for special plaza conditions, conf gurations, functions or size. • Plazas should be oriented to take advantage of views and sun exposure. • Plazas should feature entrances to retail spaces along their perimeter where possible to activate the space. • Keep lighting f xtures at a pedestrian scale. Light bollards, step, and walkway lights are encouraged. Plazas and gathering areas CLEAR CREEK CROSSING58 2.11 Open Space & Views DESIGN INTENT • Open space should feature high-quality amenities and encourage pedestrian activity. • In site planning, emphasize views toward the foothills and other prominent natural features around the site including Clear Creek. • Public areas and landscape features should embrace scenic view corridors unique to the Project’s location. DESIGN STANDARDS • Site planning, landscape design and building orientation as well as placement shall respect the site’s natural beauty as well as existing view corridors. • Site planning shall require pedestrian connections from the planning areas to points of accessibility to the multi-use trail system, whether direct of indirect. • Detention areas may be used as open space, provided that they are designed to be usable and do not allow standing water. • Multi-use trails, not included in rights-of-way, may be used as open space. DESIGN GUIDELINES • All open spaces should be designed with quality hardscape and planting materials. Ornamental trees and other plantings that provide seasonal interest are encouraged. • Open spaces should be oriented to take advantage of views and sunlight; where possible, open spaces should connect visually and physically to adjacent sidewalks and multi-use trails. • Rooftop amenities and patios are encouraged to maximize opportunities for the enjoyment of scenic views of both the mountains and the creek. Site Views Multi-use trail Site Views DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 59 2.12 Public Art DESIGN INTENT • Engage the City’s diverse communities by creating collaborations between artists and community members to achieve works of artistic excellence. • Creatively express the memory, values, traditions, customs or aspirations of community members. • Support the opportunity for public art to respond to the character and history of particular places. • Use public art and the public input process to promote a sense of unity among various groups within a community. DESIGN STANDARDS • Exterior art may be in the form of sculptures, statues, paintings or fountains. Art should be located where it is visible from the public right-of-way or in a prominent location in a public plaza. • Public Art is required in the Mill, Vineyard and Harvest Districts (Planning Areas 1,3, and 6). • All Public Art shall be submitted to the Design Review Process of the ACC. • All Public Art installations shall be approved by the City of Wheat Ridge Cultural Commission. • The ACC will interview and approve the artists for these amenities. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Locate artwork in public plazas near major entries or where otherwise visible and accessible for public enjoyment. • The provision of public art is encouraged and may be functional or purely an art form. • Public art should be considered a complement to other amenities in plazas, private amenity zones, public amenity zones or other public areas. • Public art should not compete with or detract from buildings or storefronts, nor should it obstruct pedestrian walkways or vehicular traff c. • Public Art may include but is not limited to: sculpture, two-dimensional works, wall murals and graphics, hardscape, towers, landscape and water features. Art installations should be constructed of durable and maintainable materials such as stone or metal. • Public Art shall be encouraged in any of the Planning Areas where it is not required, with exception of PA-4. • Proposed public art should represent a reasonable investment relative to the scale of the development within the Planning Area. Sculptural art Mural Sculptural art CLEAR CREEK CROSSING60 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 61 3.0 - BUILDING DESIGN CLEAR CREEK CROSSING62 3.1 Building Form, Height, and Massing DESIGN INTENT • Create building forms that are consistent with the Agrarian style of architecture def ned in the Clear Creek Crossing Vision Book. • Provide for continuity between the Districts and varied building types. • Form the building edges that reinforce pedestrian activity and create a sense of place. • Enhance corners and facades of buildings with architectural elements that support their function as ‘gateway’ buildings as well as providing iconic features throught the Project. • Provide visual interest at pedestrian levels, reduce the bulk of large buildings and use architectural features and materials to ref ect the Project’s character. • Create buildings with mass and form that provide a human-scale relationship between structures, streets and open spaces/plazas. DESIGN STANDARDS • Buildings shall use a graduation of the building height and mass through modulation of the building form. • Roof forms longer than 100’ shall be broken with a vertical change of not less than 2’ in height. • Building masses shall provide a clear delineation of entries through the use of varied building forms and roof elements. • The base of buildings shall provide visual mass utilizing a variety of materials that grounds the building and ties it into the Agrarian theme of the Project. • Buildings shall utilize forms (such as corner elements, protruded or recessed bays, changes of materials or, expressed structural elements), to transition between higher and lower buildings. • Architectural features such as corners or tower elements shall be 4 sided elements and clearly be differentiated at the parapet line if all sides are visible from a primary public right of way. • Architectural details shall occur on all four sides of the building to reduce the back of house appearance. • Roof forms and parapet heights should be varied, and where appropriate, should emphasize the facade articulation and variation of building materials. Roof forms over 50 linear feet shall incorporate at least two of the following: • Changes in roof or parapet height • Decorative cornice or eave treatment • Differentiation in material and/or color • Changes in roof type, such as hipped or gabled roof ines and modulated f at roof lines. Varied roof form Agrarian forms Clear delineation of building entries Creating a sense of place DESIGN GUIDELINES • EIFS may be used as a material for roof top screening or enclosures. • Consider views from neighboring buildings in the design and enclosure of rooftop equipment. • Consider the possibility of rooftop patios, green roofs, or decorative ballast on f at roofs. • Encourage rooftop activation that captures scenic views of the mountains and Clear Creek. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 63 3.2 Pedestrian Oriented Design DESIGN INTENT • Use the location of building walls to def ne pedestrian areas and streetscapes at a human scale. • Reinforce pedestrian activity and create a pedestrian- friendly environment. • Create continuity of edges to articulate the pedestrian walking zone. DESIGN STANDARDS • Ground f oors along primary pedestrian routes shall be given extra attention to achieve a higher level of architecture, by using pedestrian scaled facades. • Overhanging elements shall be a minimum of 10-ft above the sidewalks except for signage. • Overhanging pendant/blade signs and awnings may extend as low as 8-ft. • A variety of large overhangs, projecting roof forms, extension of entries or overhead trellises shall be encouraged in pedestrian areas to provide cover and visual interest to the public areas. • High Quality durable building materials shall be used in major pedestrian areas. • Special attention is required to manage rain water, snow melt, etc. in pedestrian areas in order to mitigate hazards, damage and nuisances in these areas. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Canopies, awnings, blade signs, balconies, and other architectural elements may overhang and extend from buildings, creating shade, amenities and pedestrian scale signage in order to activate buildings and encourage pedestrian traff c close to buildings. Activate pedestrian zones Outdoor seating Sculptural design in pedestrian zones Durable materials Pedestrian scale environment CLEAR CREEK CROSSING64 3.3 Variety and Scale DESIGN INTENT • Create buildings that provide visual interest and variety. • Create buildings that provide human scale in the lower portions of the public facing facades. • Create buildings that are contextual with the Districts and transition well to adjacent Districts. • Take advantage of view corridors into the site, using a variety and a range of building scale to pique curiosity of traff c on adjacent highways and freeways. DESIGN STANDARDS • Buildings shall be designed to accommodate human scale, providing interest and variety, using the following: • Expression of architectural or structural modules. • Varied window sizes, shapes, and patterns pertaining to visible/logical changes in massing and/or function. • Varied shadow patterns using Projecting architectural elements. • Variation of material modules, joints and connection details, surface relief, color and texture. • Building form such as recessed or Projecting bays or balconies, contrasting shapes, or changes in basic modules • Emphasis of building entries or important corners through Projecting or recessed forms, detail, color or materials, or windows/glazing. • Facades or forms of a building that face the pedestrian or open space shall receive a high level of design attention and detailing, using materials consistent with Clear Creek Crossing Building Design Standards. • Breaking up long building facades is required. Maximum length of blank wall along pedestrian zone is 20 horizontal feet DESIGN GUIDELINES • Portions of the street-facing facade that are stepped back from the facade should be allowed greater simplicity in façade detailing and scale. • Buildings that are immediately adjacent to residential neighborhoods should minimize the impact of building height, shadow and sun exposure on adjacent properties. • Buildings closest to major highways should embrace scale as an opportunity to mirror the intensity of nearby traff c, whereas buildings closer to pedestrian routes should scale to a more human level in design of architectural elements. Use of varied materials Projecting architectural elements Modern Agrarian aesthetic Creative use of materials and signage DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 65 3.4 Building Facades DESIGN INTENT • Emphasize important elements, and attract interest in buildings along primary view corridors. • As the physical constraints of the site allow, shape the location of building walls to def ne and contain the street space in a way that reinforces pedestrian activity and creates a coherent “place”. • Provide human-scaled architectural elements through changes in plane, material, texture and detail. • Moderate scale changes between adjacent buildings. • Take advantage of opportunities to enhance the arrival experience, terminate vistas, and identify building entries. DESIGN STANDARDS • All building facades visible from a street or public space shall provide a level of f nished architectural quality and be designed to the human scale. Each facade that is visible from a street or public space shall incorporate at least three of the following elements: • Reveals • Belt courses • Cornices • Deep overhangs a minimum of 3 feet in depth • Expression of a structural or architectural repeating element of at least one foot in depth • Recessed windows and/or storefronts • Color and/or texture differences • Articulation of windows and doorways, which may include sills, mullions, or pilasters that create a three-dimensional expression • When changes in plane and material occur, materials shall return to the inside corner of the projecting element. • For buildings taller than one story or setback 20 feet or more from the street, changes in plane depth to achieve facade articulation should be greater than one foot. • Each facade that faces a street or public space shall have at least one variation in plane depth, a minimum of one foot for every 50 linear feet of the length of the facade. Non-permanent features such as canopies or awnings will not qualify as variation. Plane depth variation may be accomplished through elements such as: • Upper level stepbacks • Dormers • Recessed entries • Porticos • Recessed windows and/or storefronts • Offset in the general plane of the facade including columns, pilasters, protruding bays, reveals, f ns, ribs, balconies, cornices or eaves. • Building parapet heights shall be varied and provide vertical relief to the parapet line. Parapet changes should be proportionate to the building element that it ref ects; at a minimum there must be at least of (1) foot in height in difference from the adjacent parapet. • For facades longer than 200 feet, at least one major identifying feature shall be incorporated into the building design. This feature shall be one of the following or a similar feature that creates visual interest: cupola, rotunda, spire, dome or clock. • Base elements shall not exceed two stories in height unless overall height of the building form and massing dictate a taller base. • Base elements shall be detailed to enhance the architectural character of the streetscape and provide pedestrian friendly scale. • Provide appropriate building accent lighting above street level to highlight architectural elements. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Large areas of undifferentiated or blank building facades should be avoided. • Where buildings have base, middle, and top, f oor lines in buildings should be articulated, helping to differentiate each layer. • Scaling elements and details should be integral with the building form and construction, not a thinly applied façade. • Variation in building scaling and detail should relate to the scale and function of pedestrian-active uses along the facade, creating human-scale design to support entrances, plazas, patios and amenity areas. • Both horizontal and vertical architectural scaling patterns should be used. Varied treatment of adjacent facades Enhanced arrival experience CLEAR CREEK CROSSING66 3.5 Building Transparency DESIGN INTENT • In Districts with commercial uses provide glazing on the ground f oor that increases the visibility of active uses or goods. • Create a pedestrian-friendly street environment and encourage visitors to walk between multiple destinations within the Project. • Reveal the activity of the building to the pedestrian, to activate and secure the street. DESIGN STANDARDS • Ground f oor transparency shall be measured by the length of transparent area between 0 feet and 10 feet above f nish f oor divided by the total length of that same building facade. • Windows used to meet the transparency requirements shall comply with the following standards: • Windows shall be a minimum of 5 feet in vertical dimension. • Window glazing shall be clear and shall transmit at least 65% of the visible daylight. • There shall be no ref ective coatings on the f rst surface of the glass. • Open display of individual merchandise is permitted. • Where operationally required for screening of utility spaces such as kitchens, stock rooms, off ces, etc. of commercial uses, use of graphic window coverings shall be permitted including vinyl decals or other artistic screening materials. DESIGN GUIDELINES • A variety of glass types may be used at or above the ground f oor, such as translucent glass, etched glass, glass block, acrylic channel glass, as long as the minimum transparency standards are met. • Operable openings that integrate indoor and outdoor spaces are encouraged where uses permit and is relevant to the building use. • Opaque glass or spandrel glass may be used but may not be counted towards meeting the minimum percentage for transparency. • Low-E coating are encouraged on the second and third surfaces to provide greater energy conservation. • Sun screens and shades are encouraged as long as they don’t signif cantly obstruct views through the windows. • A lower ratio of transparency to opacity may be allowed on the upper f oors of buildings if additional architectural treatments are provided. • Retail or restaurant uses: Where a retail or restaurant use occupies the ground f oor, the facade facing the primary street shall be at least 60% transparent. All other facades facing a street or public space shall be at least 30% transparent. • All other residential uses (excluding retail/restaurant): The facade facing the primary street shall be at least 40% transparent. All other facades facing a street or public space shall be at least 25% transparent. • Residential uses: Where a residential use occupies the ground f oor, windows shall be provided where appropriate to create visual interest, while also balancing the need for residents’ privacy. • Transparency shall be calculated as the percentage of clear, non-ref ective glass within the area between three (3) feet and eight (8) feet above the f rst f oor f nished elevation. • Transparent doors and window mullions shall count as transparent area. • Structural elements and opaque or ref ective glass shall not be counted as transparent area. • Glass display cases may count toward transparent area if they give the appearance of windows and are maintained with items of interest, including window display graphics that do not include advertisements. • For retail or restaurant uses on corner lots, the minimum transparency required for the primary street facade may be transferred to the secondary street facade provided that the primary street transparency is not less than 30%. Ground f oor transparency Ground f oor transparency Window display graphic DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 67 3.6 Building Entries DESIGN INTENT • Visually emphasize the major entry or entries to a building or ground f oor use. • Provide convenient access to buildings from streets, drives and pedestrian corridors. • Enhance the scale, activity, and function of the public streets. • Promote the convenience of pedestrian activity and circulation along the street by creating external, street-oriented entries. DESIGN STANDARDS • Buildings shall provide at least one primary building entry oriented to or visible from a public right-of-way. A corner building may combine two required entrances in one “corner entrance”. • Street oriented building entries shall be directly connected to the public sidewalk by a paved walk, stair or ramp. • The primary entry of each building shall be emphasized through at least two of the following: • Changes in the wall plane or building massing • Differentiation in material and/or color • Higher level of detail • Enhanced lighting • Greater amount of transparency • The following are standard acceptable entrance types: • Flush: An entrance on the same plane as the subject building facade. • Recessed Entrance: An entrance inset behind the plane of the subject building facade by no more than 10 feet. • Corner Entrance: An angled or rounded street-facing entrance located on the corner of a building 45 degrees to the intersecting streets. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Primary entries that are located on the side of a building may be allowed so long as they are visible from the public right-of-way and are directly connected to the public sidewalk by a paved walk, stair, or ramp. • Where parking is located internal to the site, multiple building entries are encouraged to allow direct access to the buildings. Recessed entrance Change in material Greater amount of transparency CLEAR CREEK CROSSING68 3.7 Awnings and Canopies DESIGN INTENT • Create clear identif able entry points for specif c users. • Enhance the pedestrian-oriented design and attractiveness, adding visual interest. • Enhance the pedestrian environment, reinforce building patterns and rhythms. • Create shade and comfort on the sidewalks. DESIGN STANDARDS • Generally, awnings shall be cantilevered from the building face to keep the sidewalk as clear and unobstructed as possible. • Awnings shall be an integral part of the architectural design of the building to which they are attached and shall be compatible with the building. • No back lit awnings shall be permitted. • Awnings shall be durable and designed with high quality materials. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Awnings should be unique, creative and pedestrian in scale. • Awnings should be consistent with and relate to the facade of the building. • Awnings should be durable and designed with high quality materials. • Awnings should be positioned so that signage is not obstructed. Cantilevered details Unique materiality Provide shade in pedestrian zones Modern Agrarian aesthetic Identif able entries DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 69 3.8 Parking Structures DESIGN INTENT • Mitigate the visual impact from parking garages onto public streets, open spaces and residential units such as glare of vehicle headlights, and the light trespass of internal lighting. • Create parking structures with signage that clearly identify parking opportunities and f t within the context of the District. • Provide ground f oor pedestrian-active fenestration within parking garage facades that adjoin a public street or open space. • Avoid large areas of undifferentiated or blank walls along public streets or open spaces. DESIGN STANDARDS • Spandrel panels, decorative panels or walls shall be at least 3 foot 6 inches high in order to conceal the headlights of parked cars from pedestrians on the opposite side of the street. • Rooftop parking deck lighting shall be limited to 20 feet in height, and shall be low cut-off type f xtures. • Parking structures that front on public streets, shall include retail, commercial, or off ce on 40% of the ground level. • Enhanced architecture with upgraded materials shall be required on f rst f oor (minimum). • Parking garage facades oriented to public streets shall include a minimum of three (3) architectural elements that provide variety and human scale, such as the following: • Expression of building structure; • Differing patterns or sizes of openings. • Changes in plane of walls. • Changes in material, pattern or color. • Expression of material or cladding system modules; • Joint patterns and attachment details. • Signs, art or ornament graphics integral with the building. • Quality, durable materials with smaller scaled modules, patterns, or textures. • Concealment of the parking garage interior at the street or aggregated open space-facing ground f oor level. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Encourage parking garage facades adjoining public pedestrian areas to be partially or wholly concealed behind a building structure that can accommodate other active uses such as commercial, institutional or residential. • When public garages occur along major street frontages, ground f oor activation/uses should be implemented. • Architectural and/or pedestrian active use standards for a parking garage may be waived if planned future building phases conceal the parking garage or add further building elements that provide pedestrian active uses or architectural interest to it. • Where it is impractical due to depth or slope to include ground f oor activation or to conceal the garage behind other street facing uses, the architectural treatment of the street facing garage façade, especially the ground f oor, should be fenestrated or screened for variety and human scale. Durable materials Durable materials Durable materials Durable materials CLEAR CREEK CROSSING70 3.9 Roof Top Design DESIGN INTENT • Reduce the visual clutter of rooftop equipment as seen from the street. • Reduce equipment noise impacts onto adjacent residential uses. • Incorporate rooftop screening elements into the architectural design of the building. DESIGN STANDARDS • Roof mounted mechanical, electrical and communication equipment that is visible from public streets, adjacent to residential uses or open spaces shall be screened from public view. • Rooftop design shall be designed either to be unobtrusive or subordinate to the building’s form and façade architecture, or should be designed to complete the building’s architectural expression. • Sloped roofs are acceptable. If asphalt shingles are used they must be high quality architectural shingles. • Rooftop equipment shall be screened via extended parapet or other compatible screening material. • Roof top patios shall not be oriented to adjacent residential properties located within 300 feet. DESIGN GUIDELINES • EIFS may be used as a material for roof top screening or enclosures. • Consider views from neighboring buildings in the design and enclosure of rooftop equipment. • Encourage rooftop activation that captures scenic views of mountains and Clear Creek including rooftop patios, green roofs or decorative ballast on f at roofs. Rooftop views Screen wall Screened rooftop equipment DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 71 3.10.1 Multifamily - Site Planning DESIGN INTENT • Site design approach is suburban with buildings setback from the street and parking lots internal to the development, minimizing their view from surrounding street(s). • Take advantage of view corridors from the site, providing residents opportunities to enjoy adjacency to Clear Creek as well as mountain vistas to the South and West of the site. • Design site with a convenient system of travel for residents, including connections within the site as well as to adjacent street(s). DESIGN STANDARDS • Any parking lot adjacent to a public street shall be screened by a combination of a minimum 5-foot wide landscape buffer and a vertical screening device, 30” to 42” • Where a parking lot abuts a property with a residential use such as where the Mill District shares a boundary with the Homestead District, a minimum 10-foot wide landscape buffer is required between the parking lot and the adjacent property line. • On-street parking on adjacent streets may count toward minimum required visitor parking and requires approval by Public Works Department. • For multi-family residential properties, open space shall incorporate amenities for play or congregation. Acceptable amenities include play structures, picnic tables, benches, or sporting area/f elds. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Pedestrian circulation should be incorporated into the design of each site with a network of walkways into, across, and through the site. • Parking lots should be arranged to maximize the connectivity and continuity of pedestrian walkways and minimize the distances pedestrians must travel between buildings. Wherever possible, parking lots should be placed in locations internal to the site, where they are not visible from the street. • Parking areas should be in safe, convenient locations for residents and guests. Carports and garages are encouraged for resident parking spaces. • Subject to approval of Community Development and Public Works Departments, detention areas may be used as open space. Pedestrian circulation Landscape buffers Carports CLEAR CREEK CROSSING72 DESIGN INTENT • Create building forms that are consistent with the Modern Agrarian style of architecture def ned in the Clear Creek Crossing Vision Book – Homestead District. • Provide visual interest at pedestrian levels, reducing the bulk of large buildings through architectural detail, landscaping and site amenities. • Place buildings on the site in a way that reinforces pedestrian activity and creates a coherent place. • Relate building height and scale to neighboring properties. DESIGN STANDARDS • Facade detail: Building facades visible from a street or public space shall provide a level of f nished architectural quality and be designed to the human scale. • Facade articulation: Each facade that faces a street or public space shall have at least one variation in plane depth, a minimum of one foot for every 50 linear feet of the length of the facade. Non-permanent features such as canopies or awnings will not qualify as variation. • Primary entrance: The primary entry of each building shall be emphasized through at least two of the following: • Changes in wall plane or building massing • Higher level of detail • Enhanced lighting • Transparency: Where a residential use occupies the ground f oor, windows shall be provided where appropriate to create visual interest, while also balancing the need for residents’ privacy. • Fenestration: At least 25% of each facade shall contain openings such as doors, windows, or balconies. • Multiple unit entrances: For buildings with multiple exterior entrances to multiple units, each unit’s entrance shall be def ned with recessed entrance, projecting entrance, change in height, change in material • Buildings shall be constructed of durable materials. Approved materials include, but are not limited to: • Stone • Integral colored textured concrete block • Hard coat stucco • Synthetic stone and masonry materials • Fiber Cement Siding/Panel • Material variation: All building facades visible from a street or public space shall employ differentiation in materials and/or colors • When multiple garages or carports are attached as one structure, there shall be a clear delineation between parking stalls or garages. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Roof forms and parapet heights should be varied, and where appropriate, should emphasize the facade articulation and variation of building materials. • Accessory structures such as carports, garages, and storage units should be designed to be consistent with the primary building(s) and to avoid monotonous facades. Wherever possible, garage doors should be placed so that they are not visible from the street. • Service, loading, and utility areas should be screened from view and minimize impact to surrounding properties. 3.10.2 Multifamily - Architecture Reinforce pedestrian activity Material variation Def ned entrances Varied roof heights Material variation DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 73 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING74 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 75 4.0 - MATERIALS CLEAR CREEK CROSSING76 4.1 Building Materials DESIGN INTENT • Utilize materials that are compatible with the modern Agrarian design aesthetic. • Encourage human-scaled buildings through the use of well-detailed and articulated materials, individually and in combination. • Use materials that convey a sense of quality, permanence and attention to detail, creating a rich variety of materials, colors and textures. • Use materials that support a more sustainable environment. • Ensure that building facades are visually active and are appropriately scaled through the use of varied architectural details, materials, textures and colors. • Use of materials to create continuity between buildings and Districts. DESIGN STANDARDS • Buildings shall be comprised of materials from the Agrarian Materials Palette consisting of Primary and Secondary Materials. • Alternative materials are allowed but are required to be submitted by the applicant as such, subject to ACC and City of Wheat Ridge approval. • Materials shall be selected with the objectives of quality and durability appropriate to the development. • Building color schemes shall tie building elements together, relate separate buildings to each other, and shall be used to enhance the architectural form and character of the building. • Intense bright or f orescent colors shall be limited in use, as accents or to create brand identify and shall not be the predominate color on any wall or roof of a building. • Primary materials shall consist of more than 50% of the overall buildings material palette. • Primary materials shall be focused in areas where public interaction and visibility is more prominent. • Secondary materials shall be utilized in non-pedestrian areas or areas that are less visible from public view. • Buildings should incorporate at a minimum of (3) primary materials. • Facades at street level that are adjacent to the public right-of-way, private streets or sidewalks shall be constructed of material that is durable and appropriate to pedestrian contact. • EIFS is not allowed at ground level or adjacent to primary pedestrian activity areas without appropriate hard surface material treatment to protect lower portion of wall. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Building colors should utilize earth and other natural tones as found in the surrounding environment as their primary consideration. • Building materials at the pedestrian level should respond to the character of the streetscape environment through scale, texture, color and detail. • In selecting materials, consideration should be given to ongoing maintenance and vandalism. • Natural wood siding or an equivalent synthetic product should be considered for use in areas as accent features on the buildings. • Building materials should incorporate new technologies and materials when possible in order to promote sustainability and energy resource responsibility. Accent stone Modern Agrarian materials Mix of materials DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 77 PRIMARY BUILDING MATERIALS: A. STONE: A variety of stone options are available throughout the Project. The three primary stone options shall be the following: • Field Stone: Large random sized shapes laid in a random pattern. • Coursed Stone: Varied sizes of cut and tumbled stone with natural face features laid in an ashlar coursing. • Cut Stone: Regular sized stone modules laid in traditional masonry patterns, i.e. running bond, stacked bond, etc. B. METAL: A variety of metal options are available through the Project. Colors are to be consistent with the overall Project. Bright colors are discouraged and shall not make up more than 20% of the building’s surface area. • Natural copper, rust colored, bronze or zinc f nishes having self-healing patinas are preferred over painted f nishes. • The three primary metal panel options are the following: a. Standing Seam: Metal panels that utilizes a raised seam in a regular pattern or spacing. b. Ribbed or Corrugated: Metal panels that have curved or ribbed linear patterns. c. Flat Panel: Metal panels that have a f at surface and utilize dry or wet sealed joints in rhythmic or random patterns for articulation. C. WOOD: A variety of wood products are available through the Project: The three primary wood f nishes are the following: • Board and Batten: Flat panel • Pre-f nished or painted wood panels with protruding vertical smaller wood strips creating a regular vertical pattern. • Cedar Siding: Natural rough sawn or milled cedar lap siding with overlapping or f ush joints. May be installed in vertical or horizontal patters and can be used on vertical or horizontal surfaces. • Reclaimed Wood or Barnwood: Wood that has been reclaimed and has a natural aged aesthetic. • Additional Wood Note: Synthetic or Alternative wood options may be utilized in lieu of natural wood if it is deemed to be unf t for the application but the desired look is to mimic or represent a wood product.. D. FIBER CEMENT PANELS: Acceptable material. Colors and textures to be complementary to overall development. E. GLASS: All glass or glazing is considered a primary building material and counts towards the overall building materials percentage. F. ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST & DECORATIVE STONE ELEMENTS: Include caps, lintels, cornices. All aforementioned are acceptable. Colors shall be complementary to overall Project. SECONDARY BUILDING MATERIALS: A. COLORED AND TEXTURED CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (CMU): Standard gray colored CMU is NOT acceptable, unless covered by another building f nish material. Split faced or honed CMU must be used as the primary element when exposed to view. CMU shall not be painted except where not visible from public streets or walkways. B. MASONRY BRICK: Acceptable material. Colors and textures to be complementary to overall development. Design and detail is to be varied and interesting and not portray a neo traditional or faux historic character. Shall not be painted unless requested and approved by the Community Development Director. C. STUCCO: Acceptable material. Generally discouraged at the bases of buildings and adjacent to pedestrian walkways. Should have natural stone aggregates and texture. Standard sand or quartzputz textures are prohibited. Break up large components and fascias through the use of joints and changes in plane and color to maintain scale of the facade. D. EIFS: Allowed on the ground f oor, street facing facades directly abutting the R.O.W. in a limited amount (20%) and should only be used as ornamental details such as parapet caps, cornices, belt courses, window details, etc. • Allowed material in non-pedestrian areas such as loading areas and internal courtyards not visible from public view. • Allowed on the upper f oors (2nd Floor and above) on all building types but may not exceed 75% of the façade material including windows and fenestration. • If located on the ground f oor in any location of a building shall have a masonry or stone base provided as a water table feature. • In limited applications EIFS or Synthetic Stucco may be used as a primary building materials that exceeds the above requirements at the discretion of the ACC and the City of Wheat Ridge’s Planning Director’s approval. • EIFS reveals are required to break up big f elds of EIFS walls. 4.2 Building Material Types Mix of materials Mix of materials CLEAR CREEK CROSSING78 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 79 5.0 - LANDSCAPE CLEAR CREEK CROSSING80 5.1 General Landscape Design DESIGN INTENT • Obtain landscape design inspiration from native regions proximate to the site as well as from the site’s rich cultural history. • Complement the overall modern agrarian design theme with landscape design through use of consistent patterns, texture, and form. • Provide seasonal interest and visual enhancement of the Project. • Create an overall landscape design that is ecologically sensitive, demanding fewer resources than a typical landscape. • Promote diversity of tree and plant material, while maintaining sustainable, water-wise, and low maintenance landscape approaches. • Utilize landscape to enhance site user experience by emphasizing views, providing screening, and offering a comfortable experience in outdoor spaces throughout the Project. • Promote a walkable, pedestrian friendly site utilizing landscape design to enhance the site experience. • Improve the appearance of surface parking areas with landscape that complements without creating hindrances. • The metropolitan district will maintain and install 40th Avenue and Clear Creek Drive Right of Way landscaping on both sides of the road, with the exception of the Coors frontage along Clear Creek Drive. DESIGN STANDARDS • The Project shall meet the City of Wheat Ridge Landscape Regulations as referenced in the Code or Ordinances, Chapter 26-502. • The Project shall utilize the concepts of water-wise and xeriscape landscaping as a means to water conservation in a semi-arid climate. • Specif ed plant materials shall meet industry standards and City requirements and be suited to the environment. • Landscape and irrigation design shall reduce the impact of drought on landscape and provide for eff cient water usage. • All landscaped areas shall be irrigated with an underground automatic irrigation system. All new irrigation systems shall utilize automatic rain shut-off technology. • Artif cial turf or artif cial plants are not allowed. • Reference the recommended plant list in Appendix C. Final plant selection to be reviewed at time of specif c plan review. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Use plants with more naturalized form in the buffers and open spaces throughout the Project, whereas planting selection for central gathering spaces should complement the form and architecture of the surrounding buildings and amenities. • Select trees, shrubs and perennials for their hardiness and demonstrated success in this semi-arid environment. • Encourage lower water use turf grasses in select locations. In high visibility areas, manicured turf or ground cover should be used to maintain a well-kept appearance. In other areas, native and/or adapted grass plantings may grow to maintain a naturalized appearance. • Utilize high eff ciency irrigation systems capable of adjusting water application according to plant’s needs. • Inconspicuous landscape lighting shall be provided to enhance landscape features. • General landscape design, including the location of landscape areas, their type, form and materials, should aim to control erosion and prevent sedimentation in municipal water drainage systems. Seasonal landscaping Agrarian aesthetic DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 81 5.2 Landscape Design Within Districts DESIGN INTENT • Emphasize the modern agrarian design theme as a commonality among all Districts. • Coordinate the landscape design between and through the Districts including landscape areas surrounding buildings, parking lots, streetscape, plaza areas or other gathering spaces, as well as the multi-use trails, which connect to regional trail systems including Clear Creek. • Create distinct patterns within each District through plants selection and overall design while still providing cohesive elements throughout the Project that relate back to the overall theme. Use of each District’s distinct character can further drive the landscape design. Refer to the Clear Creek Crossing Vision Book precedents for District character guidance. • Provide consistent landscape elements and materials throughout the Project, while adhering to the District design direction as well as guidelines and standards for other elements outlined herein. DESIGN STANDARDS • In all Districts, any area of the lot not covered by building, parking, walkways, storage, service areas or display shall receive landscape treatment. • Within commercial zones landscaping shall not be less than 20% of the gross lot size. No more than 30% of the total landscape coverage can be manicured turf. • Within multi-family residential zones landscaping shall not be less than 30% of the gross lot size. No more than 60% of the total landscape coverage can be manicured turf. • When a use / structure is adjacent to an existing residential use, a 20 foot landscape buffer is required in addition to the required setback DESIGN GUIDELINES • Plant materials should be predominantly drought tolerant species suitable to the climate and/or native to the region. • Where substantial pedestrian traff c and informal recreational activities are likely to occur, irrigated turf, either native or non-native, may be used so long as the overall plant palette is primarily drought tolerant. High water use turf types should be conf ned to high visibility areas, such as tree lawns, and active parks, retail/commercial building frontages. • Consider use of low water demand turf varieties such as Texas hybrid bluegrass, buffalo grass, blue grama grass, and tall fescue grass in low visibility, passive areas, and areas outside of retail/commercial building frontages. • To enhance the water quality leaving the site, water may be treated with water quality ponds or swales where appropriate. Water quality ponds or swales should be designed with the naturalized landscape strategy in mind. Agrarian aesthetic Agrarian aesthetic Design cues from site and site history CLEAR CREEK CROSSING82 5.3 Trees, Shrubs & Plants DESIGN INTENT • Convey a strong connection to agrarian land patterns as a design theme through landscape planting design. • Maintain both variety and distinct geometry in the landscape to recall cultivated land. Maintain strong year-round form in landscape design utilizing variety within landscape layout and plant selection. • Plant massings and monocultures can contribute to communicating the agrarian design theme. However, large plant massings should be designed in a way that can accommodate plant life cycles or disease within a species without detracting from the overall landscape appearance and character. • Provide seasonal interest and visual enhancement of the Project. • Utilize landscape design to add value to the community while maintaining sustainable, water-wise, and low maintenance landscape approaches. DESIGN STANDARDS • Specif ed plant materials shall meet industry standards and City requirements and be suited to an urban environment. • Artif cial turf or artif cial plants are not allowed. • All new plantings shall meet these minimum size requirements: • Deciduous Trees: 2-inch caliper • Ornamental Trees: 2-inch caliper • Evergreen and coniferous trees: 6-feet tall • Shrubs: #5 container • Vines, perennials, and ornamental grasses: #1 container • Mass Ground covers: #1 container • Street trees, whether on public or private property, shall conform to the plant list contained in the City of Wheat Ridge Streetscape Design Manual. • Deciduous trees in key public gathering areas shall be up-sized to 2.5” caliper. • Reference the recommended plant list in Appendix C. Final plant selection to be reviewed at time of specif c plan review. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Strong patterning in landscape layout is encouraged throughout the project to communicate the agrarian design theme. Design form should emphasize simple lines and agricultural character. • To ensure the landscape design provides an appealing and low-maintenance result, avoid over-use of a single plant species or excessively large mono-culture plant groupings. Evergreen and deciduous plants, as well as cool and warm season grasses should be mixed with enough variety to provide seasonal interest and visual enhancement. • Select trees and other plant materials that are drought tolerant and suitable to the climate or native to the region. • Natives should be given preference where appropriate. • Native plants should be used in designated natural areas and trail corridors to transition from developed areas to open space and the Clear Creek Trail. • Adapted and commonly accepted species may be used in high visibility areas. Use the recommended plant list in Appendix C as a guide for plant characteristics when selecting plants. Seasonal landscaping DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 83 5.4 Streetscapes DESIGN INTENT • Create a functional streetscape environment that unif es the Project while providing necessary amenities to pedestrians. • Provide unique character by using cohesive plantings, street trees, and other amenities within the Project. • Create a streetscape that promotes overall pedestrian circulation in a safe manner. • Encourage pedestrian activity on the sidewalk, supporting adjacent activities such as shopping, dining, strolling and gathering. • Each District’s character should drive the landscape design, with agrarian style inf uencing elements within the streetscape. DESIGN STANDARDS • Amenity Zone shall be a minimum of 6 (six) feet in width. Reference the Wheat Ridge Streetscape Design Manual for further information on Amenity Zone design. • Trees must be provided within a required Amenity Zone, with minor adjustments for elements such as signage, light pole spacing, driveways, or required public/private utility facilities. • Street lights shall be placed as generally required by the City of Wheat Ridge standards. • Trees shall be located in tree openings that are 6’ x 10’ minimum with an understory treatment that contains either sod, ornamental grasses, perennials, shrubs or a combination thereof. • Avoid random changes in street tree species. One tree species on both sides of street shall be utilized on the same block. • Vary street tree species in logical locations to limit potential impacts from loss of a particular species. Utilize trees with similar form, color, and texture characteristics for design continuity. • Aside from trees, the R.O.W. landscape from the back-of-curb and the property line shall not exceed a height of 36” above the level of the roadway. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Active uses should be placed along the streets to encourage and enhance pedestrian circulation within Districts, and enhance overall experience. Follow industry standards to address potential public safety concerns. • Streets should be visually consistent and a have a cohesive rhythm created by street trees, plantings, furnishings, paving, and lighting. • Street furnishings, trees and amenities should occupy consistent, well def ned amenity zones parallel to the pedestrian walking zone. • Sidewalk uses, outdoor seating, street-carts and vendors are subject to compliance with all applicable City laws and regulations, and are encouraged outside of the pedestrian walking zone. • Temporary lighting for special events and holidays is allowed and should be used for decorative purposes only. Interactive design elements Agrarian aesthetic Pedestrian scaled elements CLEAR CREEK CROSSING84 5.5 Site Furnishings DESIGN INTENT • Enhance the pedestrian experience along public rights-of-way as well as within the Districts through use of appropriate site furniture. • Provide visual cohesiveness through site furnishings that are consistent and complementary throughout the Project while also allowing for distinctive variation within each District. • Although site furniture in each District may vary, site furniture selection should achieve a recognizable agrarian style through the use of common materiality and form. • Provide necessary elements for pedestrian comfort and convenience, as well as site orderliness. • Complement the simple agrarian materiality relating to architecture, paving, walls, etc. DESIGN STANDARDS • Benches along sidewalks shall be oriented so they will not impede pedestrian movement. • A consistent standard for site furniture shall be developed before any installation is approved. • Seating shall be placed near building entrances, plazas, and gathering spaces. • Site furniture shall meet minimum City of Wheat Ridge and ADA requirements. • Placement of site furniture shall complement the overall walkability of the development. • Bicycle and scooter parking shall utilize cohesive and consistent bicycle parking f xtures. • A minimum of one bench is suggested for every 200 feet of commercial building frontage. Benches shall be grouped where appropriate. • At least one trash and one recycling receptacle shall be located at each main building entry, common courtyard, or seating area. • Raw, simple materials such as corten steel, concrete and natural wood or wood-look shall be emphasized in furnishings to relate to the modern agrarian theme. • A simple unif ed color palette and agrarian feel shall be maintained in site furnishing choices. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Maintenance, safety, and comfort should be considered in the selection, design and placement of site furniture. • Site furniture should be used to create public open spaces and plazas where heavy pedestrian use is anticipated. • Adequate quantities of site furniture should be implemented in all public areas, including benches, bicycle racks, and trash receptacles. • Patio seating for restaurants, coffee houses, or similar uses is encouraged. • Within plazas and gathering spaces more unique site furniture is encouraged to provide added visual interest and promote the use of these spaces. Site Furnishings Site Furnishings DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 85 5.6 Trail Furnishings DESIGN STANDARDS • Benches shall be located along the perimeter of the Trail and out of the main throughways. • Trail furnishings shall not block the minimum unobstructed pedestrian walking zones. • Simple forms emphasizing concrete, wood, and steel shall be used. Manufactured, wood-look materials are acceptable. • 42” height 3-rail fence with wire mesh shall be used where necessary for trail user safety and must be compatible with site furnishing design direction. Trail fencing shall comply with Parks & Recreation Guidelines as well as City of Wheat Ridge Code. DESIGN INTENT • Provide furnishings along the multi-use trail for comfort and convenience, as well as cleanliness. • Create visual continuity across the Project by connecting trail furnishings to the agrarian style. • Enhance the Trail with amenities to better serve those who live, work, and play nearby. • At the trailhead, provide adequate site amenities to serve a larger group of users such as parking and other facilities commonly found along the regional Clear Creek Trail. • Locate trail benches to provide respites for enjoyment of key views of surrounding natural features or points of interest. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Maintenance, safety, and comfort should be a primary consideration in the type, design, and placement of trail furniture. • Site furniture should be placed along trail in locations that have heavy pedestrian use. • Durable, high quality site furniture should be employed along the trail. • Bicycle parking for convenience of visitors to the trail should be located so that stopping at the Project to shop or dine is convenient. • Adequate quantities of site furniture should be provided in all public areas, including benches, bicycle racks, and trash receptacles. Trail Head Example Bicycle Parking Site Furnishings CLEAR CREEK CROSSING86 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 87 6.0 - LIGHTING CLEAR CREEK CROSSING88 6.1 Street and Parking Area Lighting DESIGN STANDARDS • Provide adequate lighting for safety and security following IESNA illumination guidelines. • All exterior lights for streets, parking drives, walkways and buildings shall be LED. • Pole height shall not exceed 25 feet, including pole base height. DESIGN INTENT • Lighting design provides an opportunity to unify the Project through connectivity of f xtures, harmonizing with the agrarian theme. • The street and parking area light f xture design should be minimalistic with a clean appearance that diminishes visually during the day time without detracting from the overall design theme. • Streets and parking areas should be illuminated in a consistent, attractive and unobtrusive manner that minimizes light pollution, light trespass and glare. • Lighting provides an opportunity to demonstrate energy eff ciency and promote sustainability initiatives at the Project. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Parking area light f xtures should complement the lighting of adjacent streets and properties using consistent f xtures, LED color temperature and illumination levels. • Street lighting f xture placement should create an organized appearance that is coordinated with the location of trees, curb cuts, signage and other design features to provide a coordinated and consistent streetscape. • Light poles should be located in a manner that provides a unif ed, organized appearance throughout the development, with spacing that meets the lighting criteria standards, as outlined. • Accessories and banners may be included in pole and f xture design if there is a clear connection to the overall agrarian design theme. • Lighting design should minimize light pollution, light trespass, uplight and glare. Downcast lighting LED lighting Parking Lot Lighting DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 89 6.2 Pedestrian Lighting DESIGN STANDARDS • Provide adequate lighting for safety and security following IESNA illumination guidelines. This shall include areas providing pedestrian connection to the primary multi-use trail. • All light f xtures shall be integral LED type. • Light f xtures and pole height shall not exceed 14 feet (this includes the pole base height). • Lighting shall be directed to the pedestrian zone avoiding glare to adjacent areas. • Lighting shall be designed to provide even and uniform light distribution. • Pedestrian light f xture design shall be of a consistent type, color temperature and illumination levels. DESIGN INTENT • Lighting on-site will promote a safe environment in all areas. • Incorporate pedestrian lighting at a useful and appealing scale to create visual interest in public areas, plazas and on-site amenities. • Use lighting f xtures as a design element that unif es the Districts through connections to the modern agrarian style at the Project. DESIGN GUIDELINES • When pedestrian lighting is used on streets or in parking areas it should be distinguishable, clearly def ning the pedestrian path of travel. • Raw, simple materials and f nishes should be emphasized in lighting components to relate to the modern agrarian design aesthetic to complement the overall unifying theme of the Project. • Lighting within Districts should be relevant and useful, connecting to the character and use of each respective District. • Various post attachment methods may be used, but priority should be given to maintaining a cohesive look throughout the Project. • Lighting design should minimize light pollution, light trespass, uplight and glare. Streetscape lighting Pedestrian scale lighting Streetscape / Pedestrian lighting CLEAR CREEK CROSSING90 6.3 Accent Lighting DESIGN STANDARDS • Lighting shall be used to highlight entrances and other prominent architectural features to provide clear direction for both pedestrian and vehicular traff c through the Districts. • Fixture color selection shall correlate with the material palette as well as natural color choices. Galvanized aluminum or similar f nishes are also acceptable. • Simple, rustic, or plain forms shall be emphasized over ornate or decorative styles. • A unif ed color temperature and lamp type shall be maintained wherever possible. • Fixtures shall contain only low wattage bulbs that are not greater than f fty lumens per bulb (equivalent to a seven watt C7 incandescent lamp); LED lamps are preferred. • Light f xtures shall be approved by the ACC and the City of Wheat Ridge. DESIGN INTENT • Enhance night-time views of buildings with accent lighting highlighting key amenities and architectural elements. • Incorporate pedestrian lighting to enhance the building entrances and facilitate ease of circulation. • Accent lighting fxtures should enhance and unify the Districts through connection to the agrarian style of the Project. • Select accent lighting for highlighting key areas of the site as appropriate. • The accent lighting design should add to the character and aesthetic appeal of the Project. • Enhance or highlight key architectural elements and informational displays. • Accent lighting f xture selection should enhance and unify the Districts through connection to the modern agrarian style of the Project. • The accent lighting should minimize light pollution, light trespass, uplight and glare. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Accent lighting design should minimize light pollution, light trespass, up-light and glare. • The overall scale of architectural accent lighting should be proportional to the building or structure to which the f xture is mounted. • Public gathering areas are encouraged to utilize decorative lighting, overhead string lighting or outdoor track lighting, as long as it connects to the character and use of the District. • Low level bollards, tree accent lights, or similar accent lighting should be provided in key landscape areas for night-time interest and wayf nding. • Holiday lighting is encouraged. Accent Lighting Selective use of accent lighting Accent lighting Accent lighting to highlight pedestrian spaces DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 91 6.4 General Light Standards and Intensity DESIGN STANDARDS • All exterior lights for streets, parking drives, walkways and buildings shall be LED (light emitting diode), casting a white light. • Full cut-off f xtures shall be used on all exterior locations. • A photometric lighting plan is required for all Specif c Development Plans to ensure adequate and appropriate light levels are provided for each site condition. • Light levels at the property line shall be measured as line of sight from f ve (5) feet above the ground at the property line to the nearest and brightest light source on the property. Light plans shall ref ect the theoretical light levels at the property line using this method. • Lighting plans shall identify the light loss factors (adjustments for dirt and age of f xture/lamp) for all types of exterior lights proposed. The specif ed lighting levels for any use are maximums under any f xture and are the light levels allowed without adjustments for light loss factors. • All canopy lights shall be recessed so that no lens or light source drops below the ceiling surface of the canopy. • Site lighting shall conform to the standards contained in the Lighting for Exterior Environment RP-33-99 by the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). DESIGN INTENT • The light intensity levels within all areas should correspond to use and potential hazards. • Lighting should provide adequate for adequate safety and security. • Lighting should not be placed to cause glare or excessive light spillage on neighboring sites. • Site lighting should provide consistent levels of illumination, avoiding pockets of very high or low levels of illumination. DESIGN GUIDELINES • Lighting shall provide uniform illumination in compliance with the following maximum levels of light f xture illumination: Commercial and Retail Uses Minimum to Maximum* Parking Lots 1.0 to 5.0 foot-candles Driveways 1.0 to 2.0 foot-candles Property Line No Minimum to 0.10 foot-candle (line of sight) Walkways 2.0 to 2.0 foot-candles Canopy Areas / Entryways 5.0 to 5.0 foot-candles Loading Docks 5.0 to 5.0 foot-candles Bikeways, Multi-Use Trails 1.0 to 2.0 foot-candles Courts, Plazas, Terraces 1.5 to 2.0 foot-candles *Values given are a minimum average maintained horizontal, foot-candles which are measured at the average point of illumination between brightest and darkest areas, 4-5 feet above the ground surface. (Source: IES Lighting Handbook - 4th Edition) CLEAR CREEK CROSSING92 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 93 7.0 - SIGNAGE CLEAR CREEK CROSSING94 DESIGN GUIDELINES • Overall signage design should embrace the use of natural materials, juxtaposed with the contemporary materials, using a natural color palette, accented by one or more vibrant colors. • Sign design should correspond to the set signage family; variations may be allowed subject to ACC review and City approval. • Signage should have simple, modern, and eff cient style that connects to the Project’s agrarian theme and the material palette, with some f exibility allowed to accommodate users, whether more creative or more programmed. • Signage should be designed to minimize clutter, with an emphasis on managing locations to minimize conf icts, blockages and obstructions of both circulation patterns and view corridors. 7.1 Conceptual Signage DESIGN INTENT • Creates a unif ed signage family, encouraging well-placed shared signs throughout the development. • Provide guidelines and standards for master sign plans to be submitted for each planning area, or portion thereof at least two (2) acres or more in size which is under unif ed control either by ownership, legal association or leasehold. • Through materials, parallels the relationship between the development and the nearby Clear Creek with its natural trails as well as the Project’s agrarian design theme. • An innovative design approach to signage is encouraged and is important to establishing the Project’s unique brand and image. • Accommodates the varied needs of a large mixed-use planned development with a functional signage program that supports a wide spectrum of uses and visitors.DESIGN STANDARDS • All signage shall be designed according to the standards and guidelines of the signage family. • Two types of signage shall be allowed at the Project: free-standing signage or site signs and wall-mounted signage or building signs. • Temporary signs shall be allowed according to City Code. • All signs shall be constructed of materials from the Clear Creek Crossing palette, see Section 4.0. • All sign design including color and materials, must be submitted to the ACC and the City for review and approval, respectively. • All illuminated signage shall comply with Section 26-503 of the Zoning and Development code. • Signage locations must generally comply with the Project Signage Map and/or general specif cations for placement of signs as determined by type included herein. • All signs must comply with Chapter 26 of the Zoning and Development Code, including sight triangle requirements, subject to a future master sign plan, as approved by the Planning Commission. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 95 7.2 Signage Family BRAND DESIGN The brandmark “C” and “Clear Creek Crossing” are both die cut through the various materials to reveal the layered aspects of both the literal materials and the diversity of businesses and services offered at this development. Detail on the signage creates dimensionality and interaction between the natural wood material and the ref ned metal, again reinforcing the relationships between Clear Creek and the Project and uniquely identif es Clear Creek Crossing with a logo: a beautiful natural amenity along with its associated regional trail, both crossing through the newly developed site. The accent color is a fresh and modern green, inspired by new growth at the Project with the option to further expand upon and integrate additional brand accent colors. 50’-75’ Landmark ID CLEAR CREEK CROSSING96 7.2 Signage Family, Cont. 20’ 12’ 8’8’ 12’ 6’ 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 Primary Monument Major Tenant ID Secondary Monument Interpretive / Trail Head Wayf nding Project ID DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 97 7.2 Signage Family, Cont. SIGN TYPE PLANNING AREA*MAX SIGN AREA MAX NUMBER OF SIGNS MAX. SIGN HEIGHT MIN. SETBACK LANDMARK ID*1,3,8 900 SF 3 75'30' PRIMARY MONUMENT*1,3,6 400 SF 4 20'10' SECONDARY MONUMENT*1,3,4,6,7 150 SF 10 12'5' MAJOR TENANT ID*1,2,3,6 150 SF 4 12'5' OTHER TENANT *1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 50 SF 12 8'5' PROJECT ID 1,3,4 50 SF 4 6'5' WAYFINDING 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 25 SF 8 8'5' INTERPRETIVE/TRAIL HEAD 1,2 25 SF 2 8'5' 26 TOTAL SIGN AREA PERMITTED EQUAL TO: PRIMARY WALL-MOUNTED SIGN 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 SECONDARY WALL-MOUNTED SIGN 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 UNDER CANOPY SIGN 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 PROJECTING SIGN 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 PAINTED & CREATIVE SIGN 3,4,6 OTHER SIGNS REFER TO SECTION 7.0 SIGNAGE OF THIS DOCUMENT FOR ADDITIONAL INTENT, GUIDELINES, AND STANDARDS SIGNAGE PER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE STANDARDS, CHAPTER 26, ARTICLE V, 26-701 MAXIMUM = TOTAL SIGN AREA (SF) ALLOWED LENGTH OF ELIGIBLE WALL X 1 SQUARE FOOT (SEE SECTION 7.5 FOR WALL ELIGIBILITY) BUILDING SIGNAGE FREESTANDING SIGNAGE *MAXIMUM TOTAL NUMBER OF TENANT RELATED SIGNS: * Note: The following sign location graphic map is conceptual and intended to give an idea of the overall sign plan for the site. The signage allowance chart dictates the total number of signs allowed. CLEAR CREEK CROSSING98 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 99 7. 3 S i g n a g e M a p ZO N I N G : S F R E S I D E N T I A L (E X I S T I N G ) CO O R S ’ W A T E R S T O R A G E MA P L E G R O V E EL E M E N T A R Y SC H O O L YO U N G F I E L D S T R E E T AP P L E W O O D G O L F C O U R S E (P R O S P E C T R E C R E A T I O N & P A R K D I S T R I C T ) PA 1 PA 2 PA 3 PA 4 1. L A N D M A R K I D 2. P R I M A R Y M O N U M E N T 5. M A J O R T E N A N T 6. O T H E R T E N A N T 4. P R O J E C T I D 3. S E C O N D A R Y M O N U M E N T 7. W A Y F I N D I N G 8. I N T E R P R E T I V E / T R A I L H E A D 1 1 1 1 P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P PA 4 PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 RE G I O N A L WA T E R QU A L I T Y ZO N I N G : IN D U S T R I A L (E X I S T I N G ) RA I L R O A D C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 4 0 T H A V E N U E W 3 2 N D A V E N U E PA 8 ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) ZO N I N G : P D CO M M E R C I A L (V A C A N T ) CL E A R C R E E K P A A R R C C C R R R E K K K D D E E A A B C P P P P P P P P P P R R I I V V E E NO R T H CLEAR CREEK CROSSING100 7.4 Freestanding Signs DESIGN GUIDELINES • Visibility, location of trees and vegetation, and compatibility with the surrounding landscaping and hardscaping should be considered in the placement and design of signs. • Sign lighting should be consistent with the lighting of building elements and storefront lighting. • Signs adjacent to residential neighborhoods should be turned off after business hours. • Sign lighting should be designed to minimize light pollution, in compliance with dark sky principles. Pedestrian lights shall be semi-cutoff f xtures at a minimum. • Except for Other Tenant signs, all sign types should have simple, modern, and eff cient style that connects to the sign family and material palette. • A Master Sign Plan shall be submitted for each Planning Area, and shall conform to the overall intent, standards and guidelines set forth in this document. DESIGN STANDARDS • Freestanding signs will consist of the following types of site signage: • Landmark ID Monument • Primary Monument • Secondary Monument • Project ID Monument • Major Tenant Sign • Other Tenant Sign • Wayf nding Signage • Interpretive / Trail head Signage • Landmark ID Monument Signs shall be designed to be visible by traff c along the adjacent highways, with clear identif cation of CCC as well as major tenants, with no more than six tenant panels. Maximum height of these signs shall be 50 feet, unless the panels are not visible to nearby highway traff c; Landmark signs may be up to 75 feet and only as tall as necessary to provide adequate visibility. • Monument and Project ID signs establish the character and identify of the development and shall be sited in key locations, primarily at intersections or important access drives. • Project ID signs identify the development and shall be sited in key locations, primarily at intersections or important gateways. Project ID and Monument signs are intended for a similar purpose; these sign types shall be interchangeable at gateway locations and key intersections. • Major Tenant signs shall include freestanding signs for users >30,000 SF. • Other Tenant signs shall not be required to connect to the sign family but should follow all other standards and shall be located on the lot which they advertise. • All freestanding signs shall be integrated into the streetscape, complementing items such as plantings, trees, paving patterns, and street furnishings. • No signs shall obstruct designated sidewalks. • Designated setback requirements begin at edge of ROW. The materials of freestanding signs shall be similar or closely related to the materials of the primary structures. • Variations in design and location from Master Signage Plan are allowed subject to approval of the Community Development Director. • All signs must comply with the method of measuring the surface area of the sign as outlined in Chapter 26 of the Zoning and Development Code. • All signs must comply with sight triangle requirements as outlined in Chapter 26 of the Zoning and Development Code. DESIGN INTENT • Develop freestanding sign family for the site that allows some f exibility while maintaining a brand identity for the site that serves to connect the Districts. • Through materials and color palette, design a freestanding sign family that is inspired by the natural and cultural cues that surround the site’s location • Create a balance in both design and placement of site signage, so that the Project brand is unique while the users/tenants logos are prominently placed appropriately based on relative signif cance within the overall development. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 101 LANDMARK ID MONUMENT Freestanding sign, signif cant in height to allow visibility from freeway and highway corridors Maximum area: 900 SF Maximum height: 50’-75’ Minimum setback: 30’ Maximum number in project: 3 Maximum number of panels: 6 (per sign) • Signs may be internally illuminated • May utilize a digital reader board • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area 7.4 Freestanding Signs (cont.) SIGNAGE AREA CALCULATION Dimensions Total CCC Logo 9’ x 6’ 54 SF ‘Clear Creek Crossing’: 41’ x 2’ 82 SF Store Panels (6) 6’ x 18’ 648 SF Total Sign Area: 784 SF 36’ 18’ 6’ 9’ 41’ 50’-75’ 2’ Landmark ID 6’ CLEAR CREEK CROSSING102 4’ 2’ 12’ 2’ 4’ 1’ 7.4 Freestanding Signs (cont.) Primary Monument Secondary Monument PRIMARY MONUMENT Freestanding sign, providing prominent onsite identif cation of both CCC and its most signif cant retail, entertainment and employment uses at CCC. Primary Monument Signs will be encouraged to minimize the total number of Major Tenant Signs Maximum area: 400 SF Maximum height: 20’ Minimum setback: 10’ Maximum number in project: 3 Maximum number of panels: 6 (per sign) • Signs may be internally illuminated • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area SIGNAGE AREA CALCULATION Dimensions Total CCC Logo 3’ x 2’ 6 SF ‘Clear Creek Crossing’: 11’-6” x 1’ 11.5 SF Major Tenant / User 5’ x 1” 6” 45 SF Panels (6) Total Sign Area: 62.5 SF SECONDARY MONUMENT Freestanding sign, designed to identify CCC as well as smaller tenants/users. Located along public streets, near access drives within CCC. Secondary Monument signs will be encouraged to minimize the total number of ‘Other Tenant signs. Maximum area: 150 SF Maximum height: 12’ Minimum setback: 5’ Maximum number in project: 6 Maximum number of panels: 4 (per sign) • Signs may be internally illuminated • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area SIGNAGE AREA CALCULATION Dimensions Total CCC Logo 2’ x 2’ 4 SF Tenant / User Panels (4) 4’ x 1’ 16 SF Total Sign Area: 20 SF 2’ 3’ 5’ 7’ 6”11’6”20’ 1’ 1’ 6” DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 103 7.4 Freestanding Signs (cont.) MAJOR TENANT MONUMENT Freestanding signs are associated with large commercial or employment users, generally greater than 30,000 square feet. Designed to associate with the CCC signage family, Major Tenant signs provide clear identif cation of the tenant along a public street within CCC. Primary Monument signs will be encouraged to minimize the total number of Major Tenant signs. Maximum area: 150 SF Maximum height: 12’ Minimum setback: 5’ Maximum number in project: 5 • Identif cation of CCC is required • Signs may be internally illuminated • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area SIGNAGE AREA CALCULATION Dimensions Total CCC Logo 3’ x 2’ / 4’ x 4’ 22 SF ‘Clear Creek Crossing’: 11’-6”’ x 1’ 11.5 SF Major Tenant Logo 12’ x 2’-6” 30 SF Total Sign Area: 63.5 SF OTHER TENANT SIGN Freestanding ‘Other’ signs are associated with residential, commercial or employment users. Designed to associate with the CCC signage family, other tenant signs provide clear identif cation of the tenant within the boundaries of the lot, either on public street or visible from a public street within CCC. Secondary Monument signs will be encouraged to minimize the total number if Other Tenant signs. Maximum area: 50 SF Maximum height: 8’ Minimum setback: 5’ Maximum number in project: 12 • Identif cation of CCC is required • Signs may be internally illuminated • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area 2’ 3’ 4’ 4’ 2’ 6” 1’ 12’ 11’ 6” 12’ Major Tenant CLEAR CREEK CROSSING104 7.4 Freestanding Signs (cont.) PROJECT ID Freestanding Project ID signs are located at gateway entrances to CCC at the I-70 ramps and 40th Avenue. The Project ID signs are designed to convey a sense of arrival as well as an identif cation of CCC that connects to the balance of the signage family design. Flanked signs are encouraged in a well landscaped buffer. Length of the sign at its base should be guided by site characteristics and may employ a wrap design. Maximum area: 250 SF Maximum height: 6’ Minimum setback: 5’ Maximum number in project: 4 • Signs may be internally illuminated • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area SIGNAGE AREA CALCULATION Dimensions Total CCC Logo 5’ x 6’ 30 SF ‘Clear Creek Crossing’: 30’ x 2’ 60 SF Total Sign Area: 90 SF 6’ 30’ 2’ 5’ 6’ Project ID DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 105 4’ 2’ 8’ 3’ 6” 6” 7.4 Freestanding Signs (cont.) INTERPRETIVE / TRAIL HEAD Freestanding Interpretive / Trail head signs are directional signs associated with the multi-use trail and have the similar design and scale of the Wayf nding signs within the Project. The Interpretive / Trailhead signs are located where they best assist pedestrians, hikers and cyclists. Maximum area: 25 SF Maximum height: 8’ Minimum setback: 5’ Maximum number in project: 2 • Signs may be internally illuminated • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area SIGNAGE AREA CALCULATION Dimensions Total CCC Logo 1’ x 1’ 1 SF Info Panels 4’ x 2’-6” 10 SF Total Sign Area: 11 SF WAYFINDING Freestanding Wayf nding signs are directional signs within the Project, providing distance/direction to tenants/users, trails and other CCC Project amenities. Wayf nding signs are located where they can provide guidance within CCC. Maximum area: 25 SF Maximum height: 8’ Minimum setback: 5’ Maximum number in project: 8 • Signs may be internally illuminated • Signs must be placed within a landscaped area SIGNAGE AREA CALCULATION Dimensions Total ‘Clear Creek Crossing’: 0’-6”’ x 4’ 2 SF Info Panels 3’-6” x 2’ 7 SF Total Sign Area: 9 SF Interpretive / Trail Head 4’ 2’ 6” 8’ 1’ Wayfi nding 1 ’ CLEAR CREEK CROSSING106 7.5 Building Signs DESIGN GUIDELINES • Painted signs and other creative signage expressions, including possible unique roof signage, are encouraged in Vineyard and Harvest Districts only, subject to approval of ACC and at the sole discretion of the Community Development. • Building sign lighting should be designed to minimize light pollution, in compliance with dark sky principles. DESIGN INTENT • Identify individual retail shops, anchor tenants, commercial tenants, or Project with wall mounted signs as required. • Intended to be visible from both building entrances as well as traff c thoroughfares, depending upon orientation. • Through materials and style, connects to building architecture. • Prioritize legibility and brand recognition, providing clear identif cation and direction complementary to freestanding signage. DESIGN STANDARDS • Building signs shall consist of the following types: • Primary Wall Mounted Tenant Sign • Secondary Wall Mounted Tenant Sign • Under Canopy Sign • Projecting Sign • Total allowable wall sign area shall be determined for each user by calculating the linear footage of eligible sign frontage and allowing one (1) square foot of signage per lineal foot of eligible frontage. • In determining wall eligibility, only the footprint of the structure can be used. The f oor area of gas station and drive-thru canopies cannot be applied toward the freestanding sign allowance. • Total allowable wall sign area may be re-distributed among signs provided signs are located on an eligible building frontage. • Building signs shall be constructed of durable materials permanently aff xed to an exterior surface of any building, wall or structure. • Building signs shall not extend more than 15 inches beyond the wall, with exception of projecting signs, which are allowed when oriented toward pedestrians.. • Signs placed upon marquees, canopies or awnings shall be considered as signs. • Sign design shall correspond to a set signage family, with variations allowed subject to approval of the Community Director. • Building signs located within 300 feet of and/or highly visible from existing residential uses shall be constructed either with an opaque background and translucent text and symbols, or with a dark (not white, off-white, light gray, cream or yellow) background and generally lighter colored text and symbols. • House or building address number signs shall be consistent with section 26-639 of the Zoning and Development Code. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 107 7.5 Building Signs (cont.) Primary Wall Mounted Tenant Sign: These signs identify the individual tenants within the building and are located on the exterior of the building in which the tenant is located. These signs should be located on the side of the building that is considered the primary entry/exit to the tenant space. For tenants with a corner entry, the tenant may choose which side is considered primary. Tenants are permitted multiple signs on the primary entry/exit facade of the building, as long as the overall permitted sign area is not exceeded. Secondary Wall Mounted Tenant Sign: Tenants are also permitted secondary wall mounted signs that may be placed on a non-entrance/exit side of the building that contains the tenant’s space. Secondary Wall Mounted Signs are permitted provided they face public right-of ways, parking areas, private streets or drives. Secondary signs may not exceed the size of primary signs on the same building. CLEAR CREEK CROSSING108 7.5 Building Signs (cont.) Under Canopy Sign: In addition to the wall mounted tenant signs, each tenant is permitted one pedestrian-oriented under canopy or arcade sign with a maximum area of 6 SF. These under canopy signs are not permitted to be internally illuminated, must maintain 9’ vertical clearance above pedestrian walkways, and shall only contain the tenant name and logo associated with the space. May use up to 50% of the allowed wall sign allocation for canopies Projecting Sign: Projecting signs are def ned as signs aff xed to any building, wall or structure, extending beyond the building more than 15”. Projecting and wall signs are not permissible on the same wall. Tenants are allowed one projecting sign per street frontage per business and should be oriented toward pedestrians. Sign area is limited to 1 SF for each foot of height of the building to which the sign is attached. The maximum height is the top of the wall or parapet, and signs may not be roof mounted. The maximum Projection is 10’. The sign must maintain a minimum distance of 7’from the street frontage or sidewalk. Painted & Creative Signs: These signs are expressive and intended to be used sparingly, in order to maximize impact while maintaining a tasteful aesthetic at the Project. Limited to use in the Vineyard and Harvest Districts, artistic signs shall count toward total allowed sign area fro wall mounted signs. Individual designs are subject to the approval of the ACC and the Community Development Director. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 109 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING110 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 111 APPENDIX A : GLOSSARY OF TERMS CLEAR CREEK CROSSING112 The terms included here are terms that are consistently referenced throughout this design guidelines and standards document. Active Use A use that invites and plans for pedestrian activity. Acrylic Channel Glass Channel glass wall system consisting of self-supporting translucent glass channels and an extruded metal perimeter frame. The end result is a wall that obscures vision but allows light to pass through. Amenity Zone The portion of the public rights-of-way adjacent to the back of the curb reserved for amenities. The purpose of the amenity zone is to locate elements of the streetscape, such as trees, benches, lights, bicycle racks and trash receptacles, in a consolidated area outside of the pedestrian walking zone. Applicant Any owner, developer, builder, or other person seeking approval from the City as required by these Urban Design Standards and Guidelines. Architecture Review Board The applicant will have a Covenants, Controls, and Restrictions review board that will review all development for the compliance with this Off cial Development Plan prior to submission to the City of Wheat Ridge. After review of the proposal, a letter of approval or disapproval will be submitted to the City. Tenants of the development will have the opportunity to design and develop their own buildings and storefronts, which designs will be reviewed by the Covenants, Controls, and Restrictions review board. The Covenants, Controls, and Restrictions review board reserves the right to reject any submittal that does not comply with the intent of this document. Block For purposes of these Standards and Guidelines, a tract of land within the Site bounded by public streets, private streets, or by private drives. Build-to Line A line extending through a lot which is generally parallel to the front property line and marks the location from which the principle vertical plane of the front building elevation, exclusive of porches, bay windows, canopies, awnings and similar appurtenances, must be erected. CDOT ‘A’ Line The Colorado Department of Transportation “access control line” depicted as the CDOT ‘A’ Line is used to regulate the “control of access” to interstate rights-of-way and designated frontage roads for both transportation and non-transportation purposes. All land owners adjacent to “access control lines” are restricted from each and every right of access, from or to any part of Clear Creek Crossing Drive and the west-bound Interstate 70 off and on ramps, including the ability to ingress and egress properties adjacent and abutting the access control. Detached Sidewalk A paved walkway that is not attached to the street curb or a building and is commonly separated from the curb by a tree lawn or by an amenity zone. Glossary of Terms DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 113 Developer The owner of a site, or a Project proponent or agent authorized by the owner to act on behalf of the owner in the design and construction of any development within the site. EIFS Exterior Insulating Finishing System. Façade The exterior vertical walls of a building and any face of a building given special architectural treatment. Fenestration The arrangement, proportioning and design of windows and openings within a building façade. Floor Area Ratio (FAR) The ratio of gross f oor area of a building to the area of the zone lot on which the building is located. Furnishings Any of numerous types of street furniture, f xtures, or equipment most commonly used on commercial streets. Examples include pedestrian lights, benches, newspaper vending boxes, trash receptacles, planters, tree grates, fences railings, bicycle racks, mailboxes, fountains, kiosks, and public telephones. Gabion Wall A gabion is a cage, cylinder, or box f lled with rocks used for landscaping. A gabion wall is a retaining wall made of stacked stone-f lled gabions tied together with wire. LEED® Certifi cation, Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. Green Building Rating System, developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC), which provides a suite of standards for environmentally sustainable design. Live Work buildings A building type that has a commercial use on the main f oor and residential above or attached. Mixed Use Buildings The use of a structure that combines or integrates both residential and non-residential uses in the same structure/building. Modifi cation Any departure from a standard or requirement contained in these Urban Design Standards and Guidelines as reviewed during the Design Review Process (Chapter 10.0). Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Glossary of Terms CLEAR CREEK CROSSING114 Mechanically Stabilized Earth or MSE walls stabilize unstable slopes and retain soil on steep slopes and under crest loads. Non-Residential Uses All uses of property other than residential use. Open Space Open Space is def ned to include plazas and landscape areas open to the sky. This def nition includes both green landscapes and hardscape areas outside of the public rights-of-way. Parking Structure Any building or part of a building wherein more than three (3) motor vehicles are or can be housed or stored, including, but not limited to, parking decks and multilevel parking structures. Park An area of land which is developed or intended for development with landscaping and other features which promote recreational activities, passive or active, by the public. May be either publicly or privately owned. Parkway Parkways are typically characterized by landscape features such as broad medians incorporating tree and shrub masses, spacious tree lawns and linear tree plantings f anking wide streets. The term parkway and boulevard are often used interchangeably. Pedestrian Active Uses. Business or activities that engages the interest of people passing by on adjacent sidewalks and allows views into store windows and building interiors. Pedestrian Walking Zone The portion of sidewalk either within public rights-of-way or on private property, between the amenity zone and the building related zone and reserved for unimpeded pedestrian travel. The purpose of the pedestrian walking zone is to provide an area outside of the amenity zone the remains clear for pedestrian walking. See Illustration No. 2. Plaza An open area at ground or elevated level accessible to the public at all times, and not within the right- of-way, which is unobstructed from its lowest level to the sky, although it may contain arbors, trellis, gazebos, picnic covers, sun shades and other non-enclosed roof-like forms that add to the usability and enjoyment of outdoors. The majority of the surface is hardscaped, but any portion of a plaza occupied by landscaping, statuary, pools, and open recreation facilities shall be considered to be a part of the plaza for the purpose of computing a f oor area premium credit. The term “plaza” shall not include off-street loading areas, driveways, off-street parking areas or pedestrian ways accessory thereto. Quality Refers to the use of a material that is low maintenance, will stand up to wear and tear and is appropriate for the intended use or design application. Glossary of Terms DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 115 Glossary of Terms Quartzputz Quartzputz is one of the original stucco textures. Not an acceptable texture at Clear Creek Crossing. Retail Any space or building used for the sale of goods to the ultimate consumer for direct consumption and not for resale. Right-of-Way The area of land under public ownership and commonly reserved for public use as a street, which may also include areas devoted to tree lawns, sidewalks, trails, bicycle paths, benches, and other public amenities and subsurface utilities. Scale The perceived size of a building, space, or roadway in relation to a human or automobile that affects the apparent size of street spaces and how comfortable they feel to pedestrians and drivers. Architectural design details and overall organization of the street can affect scale. Story Where the term “story” is used in the various zone districts for the purpose of determining setback from perimeter lot lines for nonresidential buildings, each twelve (12) feet of building height shall be considered a story, and for residential buildings, each ten (10) feet of building height shall be considered a story Street Trees Trees that line the street in a right-of-way between the curb and the abutting property line, or pedestrian path. Streetscape A term generally referring to pedestrian amenities and landscape improvements located within the public-right- of-way or public easement. The term “streetscape” generally refers to the public amenity zone, the unobstructed pedestrian zone and the pedestrian amenities, furnishings and landscape improvements such as tree lawns or trees in grates. Terminating Vistas A term generally referring to points of interest at the end of certain important street view corridors through the Development. Tree Lawn The area of lawn or planting between the curb and the detached sidewalk where street trees are planted. Wayfi nding How occupants traverse a space. Supplemented with signage and the built environment. CLEAR CREEK CROSSING116 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 117 APPENDIX B : MATERIAL LIST CLEAR CREEK CROSSING118 Materials STONE • Field Stone: Large random sized shapes laid in a random pattern. • Coursed Stone: Varied sizes of cut and tumbled stone with natural face features laid in an ashlar coursing. • Cut Stone: Regular sized stone modules laid in traditional masonry patterns, i.e. running bond, stacked bond, etc. METAL • Standing Seam: Metal panels that utilizes a raised seam in a regular pattern or spacing. • Ribbed or Corrugated: Metal panels that have curved or ribbed linear patterns. • Flat Panel: Metal panels that have a f at surface and utilize dry or wet sealed joints in rhythmic or random patterns for articulation. WOOD • Board and Batten: Flat panel pref nished or painted wood panels with protruding vertical smaller wood strips creating a regular vertical pattern. • Cedar Siding: Natural rough sawn or milled cedar lap siding with overlapping or f ush joints. May be installed in vertical or horizontal patters and can be used on vertical or horizontal surfaces. • Reclaimed Wood or Barnwood: Wood that has been reclaimed and has a natural aged aesthetic. • Additional Wood Note: Synthetic or Alternative wood options may be utilized in lieu of natural wood if it is deemed to be unf t for the application but the desired look is to mimic or represent a wood product. FIBER CEMENT PANELS • Nichiha - Acceptable material. Colors and textures to be complementary to overall development. GLASS • All glass or glazing is considered a primary building material and counts towards the overall building materials percentage. PRECAST & DECORATIVE STONE ELEMENTS • Include caps, lintels, cornices. All aforementioned are acceptable. Colors shall be complementary to overall Project. SECONDARY MATERIALS • COLORED AND TEXTURED CONCRETE MASONRY UNITS (CMU): Standard gray colored CMU is NOT acceptable, unless covered by another building f nish material. Split faced or honed CMU must be used as the primary element when exposed to view. CMU shall not be painted except where not visible from public streets or walkways. • MASONRY BRICK: Acceptable material. Colors and textures to be complementary to overall development. Design and detail is to be varied and interesting and not portray a neo traditional or faux historic character. Shall not be painted. • STUCCO: Acceptable material. Generally discouraged at the bases of buildings and adjacent to pedestrian walkways. Should have natural stone aggregates and texture. Standard sand or quartzputz textures are prohibited. Break up large components and • ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST CONCRETE: Shall be integrally colored and may be textured if desired. May be used as a veneer applied over an independently constructed enclosure and substrate. Break up large components and fascias through the use of joints and changes in plane and texture to maintain scale of the facade. • EIFS or Synthetic Stucco: Allowed on the ground f oor, street facing facades directly abutting the R.O.W. in a limited amount (20%) and should only be used as ornamental details such as parapet caps, cornices, belt courses, window details, etc. DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 119 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING120 DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 121 APPENDIX C : PLANT LIST CLEAR CREEK CROSSING122 Plant List DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES Scientif c Name Common NameAcer Miyabei ‘Morton’ State Street Maple Catalpa speciosa Western Catalpa Celtis occidentalis Western Hackberry Gleditsia triacanthos inermis ‘Imperial’ Imperial HoneylocustGleditsia triacanthos inermis ‘Shademaster’ Shademaster Locust Gymnocladus dioicus Kentucky CoffeetreePopulus x acuminata Lanceleaf CottonwoodPopulus sargentii Plains CottonwoodQuercus macrocarpa Burr OakUlmus Parvifolia ‘Emerii’ Allee Elm EVERGREEN TREES Scientif c Name Common NameAbies concolor White FirJuniperus scopulorum Rocky Mountain JuniperPicea pungens Colorado SprucePicea engelmanni Engleman SprucePinus aristata Bristlecone PinePinus edulis Pinyon PinePinus f exilis Limber PinePinus nigra Austrian Pine Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine DECIDUOUS SHRUBS Scientif c Name Common NameAmelanchier alnifolia Saskatoon ServiceberryAmorpha fruticosa False IndigoAronia arbutifolia ‘Brilliantissima, Brilliant Red ChokeberryAronia melanocarpa ‘Iriquois Beauty’ Dwarf ChokecherryBuddleia davidii Butterf y BushCaryopteris x clandonensis Blue Mist SpireaCercocarpus intricatus Littleleaf Mountain MahoganyChamaebatiaria millefolium FernbushChrysothamnus nauseous RabbitbrushCornus sericea ‘Isanti’ Isanti DogwoodForsythia ‘Arnold Dwarf’ Arnold Dwarf Forsythia Lonicera involucrate Twinberry HoneysuckleMahonia repens Creeping Oregon GrapePhiladelphus microphyllus Littleleaf MockorangePhysocarpus monogynus Mountain NinebarkPrunus besseyi Western SandcherryPrunus besseyi ‘Pawnee Buttes’ Pawnee Buttes SandcherryRhus Glabra Smooth Sumac Rhus trilobata Three Leaf SumacRibes cereum Golden CurrantRosa woodsii Woods RoseSalix purpurea ‘Nana’ Dwarf Arctic Blue Willow ORNAMENTAL TREES Scientif c Name Common NameAcer grandidentatum Bigtooth MapleAmelanchier x grandif ora Autumn Brilliance ServiceberryBetula occidentalis fontinalis Western Red BirchCraetageus crus-galli ‘Inermis” Thornless Cockspur HawthornCrateagus phaenopyrum Washingtion HawthornKorelreuterisa paniculatat Goldenrain TreeMalus X ‘Spring Snow’ Spring Snow CrabapplePrunus americana American PlumSyringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac EVERGREEN SHRUBS Scientif c Name Common NameArctostaphylos ‘Panchito’ Panchito ManzanitaCotoneaster dammeri ‘Coral Beauty’ Coral Beauty CotoneasterEuonymus Fortunei ‘Emerald Gaiety’ Emerald Gaiety EuonymusPicea pungens ‘Globosa’ Globe SprucePicea pungens ‘R.H. Montgomery’ R.H. Montgomery SprucePinus mugo ‘Slowmound’ Slowmound Mugo PinePinus mugo ‘Tannenbaum’ Tannenbaum Mugo PinePinus mugo ‘White Bud’ White Bud Mugo PineJuniperus communis ‘Mondap’ Alpine Carpet Juniper Juniperus sabina ‘Monna’ Calgary Carpet Juniper Juniperus sabina ‘Buffalo’ Buffalo JuniperJuniperus virginiana ‘Blue Arrow’ Blue Arrow JuniperYucca f lamentosa ‘Ivory Tower’ Ivory Tower Yucca Scientif c Name Common NameSpiraea Japonica ‘Goldf ame’ Goldf ame SpireaSpriaea Nipponica ‘Snowmound’ Snowmound SpireaSpirea Japonica ‘Little Princess’ Little Princess SpireaSymphoricarpos albus Snowberry Syringa patula ‘Miss Kim’ Miss Kim LilacSyringa vulgaris Common Purple Lilac Physocarpus monogynus Mountain NinebarkPrunus besseyi Western SandcherryPrunus besseyi ‘Pawnee Buttes’ Pawnee Buttes SandcherryRhus Glabra Smooth Sumac Rhus trilobata Three Leaf SumacRibes cereum Golden CurrantRosa woodsii Woods RoseSalix purpurea ‘Nana’ Dwarf Arctic Blue WillowSpiraea Japonica ‘Goldf ame’ Goldf ame SpireaSpriaea Nipponica ‘Snowmound’ Snowmound SpireaSpirea Japonica ‘Little Princess’ Little Princess SpireaSymphoricarpos albus Snowberry Syringa patula ‘Miss Kim’ Miss Kim LilacSyringa vulgaris Common Purple Lilac DESIGN PATTERN BOOK 123 Plant List (Cont) ORNAMENTAL GRASS Scientif c Name Common NameAndropogon Gerardii Big BluestemBouteloua curpitendula Side-Oats GramaBouteloua gracilis ‘Blonde Ambition’ Blonde Ambition Grama GrassCalamagrostis acutif ora ‘Karl Foerster’ Feather Reed GrassDeschampsia caespitosa Tufted HairgrassMiscanthus sinensis ‘Adagio’ Adagio Maiden GrassPanicum virgatum SwitchgrassSchizachyrium scoparium Little BluestemSporobolus heterolepis Prairie Dropseed PERENNIALS Scientif c Name Common NameAchillea millefolium Common White MarrowAquilegia caerulea Native ColumbineArnica cordifolia Heartleaf ArnicaCoreopsis tinctoria Plains CoreopsisErigeron speciosus Aspen Daisey Dalea purpurea Purple Prairie CloverDelphinium virescens Plains LarkspurGaillardia aristata Blanket FlowerGeranium richardsonii Richardson GeraniumIris missouriensis Rocky Mountain Wild IrisLiatris puncata Spotted Gayfeather Oenothera caespitosa Tufted Evening Primrose Penstemon strictus Rocky Mountain PenstemonRatibida columnifera Mexican HatRudbeckia hirata Black Eyed SusanThermopsis divaricarpa Gold BannerYucca glaua SoapweedZinnia Grandif ora Rocky Mountain Zinnia Planning Commission WZ-16-07 / Clear Creek Crossing 32 [see attached document] EXHIBIT 9: VISION BOOK January, 2018 VISION BOOKCLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO 1CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 VISION Located at the southwest quadrant of Hwy 58 and I-70 in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, Clear Creek Crossing is an 110-acre planned mixed use development, including retail, entertainment, hotel, multi-family residential and employment land uses. With the site’s proximity to Clear Creek, the project will include a strong connection to the creek through the use of trail networks to and through the planned development. Clear Creek Crossing’s community-driven approach will embrace simplicity in its design, taking cues from the natural beauty and history of the location while taking advantage of visibility and direct accessibility to a major freeway corridor. It will provide the community with exciting new opportunities to live, work, shop, dine, stay and play. 2CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY 2018 Community is not a place, but the connection among people with something in common - sharing experiences. Where communities connect to the place, that is Clear Creek Crossing. VISION 3CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 ZONING: SF RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING) COORS’ WATER STORAGE MAPLE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PA 1 PA 2 PA 3 PA 4 PA 4 PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 ZONING: INDUSTRIAL (EXISTING) C LEAR CREEK DRIVE C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 40 T H A V E N U E YOUNGFIELD STREET W 3 2 N D A V E N U E RAILROAD APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE (PROSPECT RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT) PLANNED I-70 HOOK RAMPS PA 8 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) CLEAR CREEK PROJECT Clear Creek Crossing Outline Development Plan (ODP) includes eight (8) planning areas, each with unique development standards. The site’s location at the junction of I-70 and Hwy 58 off ers an opportunity for a wide mix of uses within the planned development, given its superb visibility and accessibility, via planned ramps directly into Clear Creek Crossing. The site envelopes a signifi cant portion of Clear Creek and its associated trail, providing existing connections to regional trails and surrounding communities. Refer to the Clear Creek Crossing Offi cial Development Plan for the allowable use chart and a depiction of the individual planning areas. Specifi c project guidelines and land development standards are detailed in the Clear Creek Crossing Design Pattern Book, intended to provide clear and consistent direction for the future development of the project. 4CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 PROJECT SITE HISTORY This site has a rich history that extends all the way back to the Colorado Gold Rush. Clear Creek is renowned for its part in the most intense and early mining activity during the Gold Rush of 1859. Later on, this site, also known as the Arapahoe Bar, was the location of the fi rst irrigation ditch and commercial farming operation in Colorado. For over 155 years men, women and children have come to this place to experience the thrill of discovery and the connection with the great Colorado outdoors. OVERALL CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT The Clear Creek Crossing Planned Mixed Use Development is intended to provide the City of Wheat Ridge with a destination development that includes a wide range of uses to grow the City’s commercial, residential, and employment bases. Through the use of unifying design elements, including architectural style, landscape design and urban design with special attention paid to its public spaces, this project will be unique in uses and authentic in its architectural style, while providing a cohesive experience for the user. The development will focus on creating a strong sense of place that respects the cultural heritage, promoting cultural awareness as well as strong kinship ties. Clear Creek Crossing will celebrate the intrinsic values that defi ne the City of Wheat Ridge, seeking to embrace the simple beauties of the landscape in an authentic gesture. The overall design theme for the project is a modern agrarian aesthetic that blends traditional agrarian forms and materials with modern archetypes and users. To accomplish this theming among the distinct land uses within the project, a group of districts have been established to allow a unique treatment for each land use while maintaining cohesive design elements throughout all districts. The project is envisioned to be one grown from the earth with a strong emphasis on the base plane and building integration with the site as well as surrounding context. With its proximity to Clear Creek, along with the rich history of the area, the overall character of this development will focus on a strong connection to the creek through the use of trail networks, signage, wayfi nding graphics, and other site amenities. Clear Creek Crossing will focus on a community-driven approach, accomplished by creating connections to the surrounding neighborhoods for easy access into the site, unifying design elements, and providing numerous opportunities to shop, live, work, and play. 5CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 HOMESTEAD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT MILL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT HARVEST COMMERCIAL DISTRICT VINEYARD COMMERCIAL DISTRICT COORS’ WATER STORAGE POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTIVITY (FUTURE PHASE) RAILROAD YOUNGFIELD STREET W 3 2 N D A V E N U E WAGON OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 PA 4PA 4 PA 3 PA 1 PA 5 PA 2 C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E 40 T H A V E N U E APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE (PROSPECT RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT) HASHASHASAAE)E)E)) PA 8 E NU EZONING: SF RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING) ZONING: INDUSTRIAL (EXISTING) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) POTPOPOTPOTPOTPENTENTENTNTEN FUTFUTFUTFUTFUFURURURUR CONCONCONCONCONNECNECNECNECECCTTT (FU(FU(FU(FU(TURTURTURUREPEPPEE DI HHHHHOM RES CO INEYARD OMMERCIAL WAGON OPEN SPACE DISTRICT PAPA4V CO HARVEST COMMERCIAL DISTRICT I MESTEADDD IDENTIAL MILL OMMERCIAL DISTRICT STRICT IDENTIAL OMMERCIAL DISTRICT PA 6 PA 7 PA 3 CO PA 1 PA 2 C L L L L L L E E A A A A A A R R R C C C C R R R R EEEE E E E KKK DDD RRRR I I I I VVVVVV EEEEEE E E E E E E E E E E E E E U NU U U U NU N U U NU NU U U NU NU N N N N N N N N E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E NU NU NU U N N E E E E E E E E E E E NU E E E E E E U U NU U U U N N N N N E E E E E EN U E A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A VE V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V A A A A V V V V A VE A A A A A A A A 40 40 40 40 0 40 40 0 40 4 0 40 0 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 TH TH TH H H H TH H TH H H H H H H TH H H TH H TH H H H H H H H H H TH T T T T T T A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A H TH H TH A A A A A A 40 T H A A A A A VE VE V V V A V A A A A 40 40 40 40 40 4 4 4 4 4 TH TH TH TH TH TH A A A A A 40 T H A 40 TH A VE AAAPPAPPAPAPPAPAPPAPPAPPAPPPLEWLEWLELEWLEWLEWLEWLEWWLLEWWOODOODOODOODODODOODO GOGOGOGOGOOGOGGGGGLFLFLFLFLL CCOUCOUCOUCOORSERSERSERSSES IALIALIALLIALIA REREREE IVIVIVIVVVITYITYITYITYITYITYTY HASHASHASSASE)E)E) E YYYYYYY PA 8 ZONZOZOZONZONZONOZONNONNNZOZOINGINGINGNGINGGNGIGNGGGG:: PPP: PP:PPD DD D COMCOCOCOCOMCOOOMCOMMOMCOMMMERMERMERMERMERMERRMERRRCCCCCCIAACIACCCCICCALLLLLLLL (V(VA(VAVAVAVA(V(VVAVAVA((CANCANCANCANACANANCANCANNANCNCANNNCANTT)T)T)TT) ZONZOZONZONZONOINGINGINGINGINIG: PP: P: P: PPPDDDDDD COMCCOMCOMCOMMMERMERMERMMERRERRCIACIACIACIAAIACIALLLLLL (VA(VA(VA(VA(VA(VA(VAAACACCANANCANCANCANCANAANNNNNNNT)T)T)T)T) CLEAR CREEK NORTH SCALE: 1”=300’ 0 300 600 Project Districts The Clear Creek Crossing Planned Mixed Use Outline Development Plan includes eight planning areas; based on the proposed use within each planning area, distinct groupings or Districts have been created in order to apply distinct and varied treatment that is unique to the use within that district, while maintaining cohesive theming through the use of architecture, landscape, urban design, and signage. DISTRICTS 5 6CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 DISTRICTS The Harvest District encompasses retail and hospitality uses. Design inspiration comes from cultivated agrarian land patterns. Defi ned with landscape treatment recalling plentiful harvest, the District is characterized by form following function. The Mill District’s form follows function of activity and productivity. The employment land use is complemented with raw agrarian materials. Landscape design and form may refl ect working mills using key agricultural imagery like storage silos or water wheels as inspiration in this District. The Vineyard District includes entertainment, restaurant, and retail uses creating a central social destination. Strong unifi ed architecture and design refl ecting cultivated land forms will establish this portion of Clear Creek Crossing creating a unique community experience. Anchored by multi-family land use, the Homestead District is for dwelling. Agrarian forms in architecture, landscape, and amenities create a community that off ers a place to call home. Opportunities for community gardens can refl ect the nature of a traditional homestead. The Homestead will make the most of mountain views and proximity to Clear Creek, with strong connectivity to the rest of the community. Consisting of the foot trails and bike ways, the creek area, and scenic views, the Wagon District will be a place of activity and leisure that provides strong connectivity throughout the entire site including convenient access to Clear Creek. The Wagon District will serve the community by providing an important link to the great Colorado outdoors. HARVESTMILLVINEYARD HOMESTEAD WAGON 7CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 MILL The Mill District encompasses employment uses, encouraging medium to high density development, with uses including corporate campus-type uses such as offi ce, research & development, hospital, and university/education uses. Buildings shall be placed according to the requirements of the respective use and in consideration of the characteristics of the site. Parking is likely to be surface with a potential for structured parking where appropriate. Building height, density and setbacks refl ect the site’s location on an interstate. The Vineyard District is comprised of retail and entertainment uses including stores, shop buildings, banks, restaurants including both full-service and quick- serve, theater and gaming. Buildings shall be placed according to the requirements of the respective use and in consideration of the characteristics of the site, while placing a priority on circulation, walkability and common site amenities. Parking will be in surface lots, with potential for structured parking to serve entertainment uses. Site design at the pedestrian level will encourage walkability by connecting users to the planning areas and the various tenants within them. Where possible, siting of buildings should prioritize fronting to public or private streets with parking located behind to help establish place- making. Retail, in the form of large format with accessory small retail uses, restaurant and hotel uses will create the Harvest District. Buildings shall be placed according to the requirements of the respective use and in consideration of the characteristics of the site, while placing a priority on circulation and walkability. Parking will be in surface lots. Signage is intended to be “brand- forward” as required by national operators but should coordinate with the overall Clear Creek Crossing signage design. Multifamily residential uses, including apartment complex and/or townhome formats comprise the Homestead District. Buildings shall be placed according to the requirements of the respective use and in consideration of the characteristics of the site, while placing a priority on circulation and walkability. Parking will be in surface lots. In addition, above grade garages tucked under units in buildings or in separate buildings shall be allowed. The Wagon District is a multi use trail network connecting to all other Districts by sidewalks. It connects to locations off - site to the north at Clear Creek Trail and to the south, at the planned trail by Prospect Recreation and Park District connecting to the Applewood neighborhood through the existing Applewood Golf Course. The trails will include common surface design, wayfi nding signage, trash receptacles, benches and other amenities. Landscaping should be natural and native to the region. Shade shall be provided by trees and a trailhead shade structure with a small surface parking lot at the northern end of the site as well as street parking along Clear Creek Drive will be utilized to provide access to the Clear Creek Trail. HARVESTVINEYARD HOMESTEAD WAGON DISTRICTS 8CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 ARCHITECTURE Architectural design is grounded in the beauty and history of the site with a modern agrarian aesthetic, blending traditional forms with modern users. Simple yet expressive structures create a strong sense of place while respecting the cultural heritage of the location. ARCHITECTURAL INTENT & CHARACTER With respect to the surroundings of this site as well as its rich history and relation to Clear Creek, the architecture of this development should be one that is grounded in its site, both from a local and regional perspective. While the intent of the development as a whole is intended to create a cohesive and inviting environment, the architectural style of individual buildings is intended to remain fl exible in design in order to allow for a unique development and discourage monotony. The architecture is intended to be of a modern expression while including hints of vernacular architectural styles of the Front Range and the Rocky Mountain region. This will manifest itself in the building forms and massing, roof forms, fenestration patterns & openings, overhangs and canopies, materials and fi nishes, building transparency and the utilization of indoor/outdoor spaces which provide a strong connection to the outdoor lifestyle. Key themes to be considered to achieve this vernacular Colorado style include modern interpretations of authentic architectural styles including ranch, agrarian, prairie, and western industrial. It is imperative that some fl exibility in the following standards and guidelines be considered to allow for architectural variety and franchise architecture, as long as the proposed quality is consistent with these guidelines. 9CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Connected to the rich history of the location as well as its proximity to Clear Creek, simple forms and materials drawn from barns, sheds and stone buildings inspire the modern agrarian design direction. These buildings are utilitarian, with design and materials intended to serve a functional purpose, built to last over time. Pure yet expressive structures, these simple forms are a response to the site and in many ways contemporary in approach. ARCHITECTURE 10CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Key architectural themes call for a utilitarian approach to building and roof forms arising from basic needs, where every element has a purpose. Rugged but inviting, these structures refl ect the outdoor lifestyle embedded in the culture of the community, manifested through building and roof forms, massing, transparency, fenestration patterns, openings and canopies. ARCHITECTURE 11CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 The building forms at Clear Creek Crossing utilize simple modern agrarian archetypes. Buildings are to be broken down into smaller human scaled elements that are seamlessly integrated into the ground plane. Buildings are designed to feel indigenous to the area and representative of the agricultural history of the site. The roof forms of the buildings are intended to be one of the key design elements for the buildings at Clear Creek Crossing. Buildings will incorporate a variety of roof types, slopes, and materials. ARCHITECTURE 12CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Material palette may apply to architecture, signage and site amenities at Clear Creek Crossing. Materials should be simplistic in approach to the agrarian design and provide a connection to the natural cues of the site. ARCHITECTURE AGRARIAN MATERIAL PALETTE CMU STUCCO BOARD FORMED CONCRETE SECONDARY BOARD & BATTEN WOOD CEDAR SIDING STANDING SEAM CUT STONE WEATHERED METAL COURSED STONE STONE RECLAIMED RUSTIC FIELDSTONE 13CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 The overall material palette for Clear Creek Crossing should be applied using the basic agrarian principles illustrated throughout the Vision Book. Material applications should be authentically applied with a focus on simplicity and an emphasis towards enhancing the building forms. ARCHITECTURE 14CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 While a cohesive and inviting environment is the intention, the architectural style of individual buildings may remain reasonably fl exible, responding to the needs and expression of the respective uses, as suggested within the Districts. ARCHITECTURE 15CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Mill District Employment uses including corporate campus facilities, offi ces, hospital, research and development buildings. DISTRICT ARCHITECTURE 16CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Vineyard District Retail uses including stores and shop buildings, banks, and restaurants arranged both individually and in a collective format. DISTRICT ARCHITECTURE 17CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Homestead District Multi-family residential uses including apartments and townhomes. DISTRICT ARCHITECTURE 18CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Harvest District Larger format retail and hotel uses with potential for smaller retail uses as an accessory to the District. DISTRICT ARCHITECTURE 19CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Wagon District Multi-use trail and sidewalk network connecting the Districts as well as providing a link to Clear Creek and nearby neighborhoods. DISTRICT ARCHITECTURE 20CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 21CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 EXISTING TRAIL Existing Clear Creek Trail A key goal of Clear Creek Crossing is to maintain equivalent opportunities to access the Clear Creek trail system as they exist in the pre-development condition. Parking, interpretive signage, and access points are all considered as amenities to carry into the fi nished project. BRIDGEBRIDBRIDGEGE EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAILEEXISEXISNTINGTINGCLECLEAR CAR AR R CLEAR CREEK EXISTING TRAILHEAD/PARKING LOT AAIILLLL EXISTING REGIONAL DETENTION EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL CONNECTIONIEXISEXISEXISSSSTINGTINGTINGCLECLECLEAR CAR CAR CREEKREEKREEK TRATRATRAIL CIL CIL CONNEONNEONNECTIOCTIOCTIONNN EXISTING UNPAVED PARKING WITH ARAPAHOE BAR INTERPRETIVE SIGN ARAPAHOE BAR INTERPRETATIVE SIGN REGIONAL DETENTION AREA OBLIQUE AERIAL OF SITE NORTH CLEAR CREEK CROSSING SITE BRIDBRIDRIDGEGEGE EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL 22CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION ZONING: SF RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING) ZONING: INDUSTRIAL (EXISTING) COORS’ WATER STORAGE MAPLE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PA 1 PA 2 PA 3 PA 4 PA 5 PA 6 RAILROAD YOUNGFIELD STREET W 3 2 N D A V E N U E APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE (PROSPECT RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT) PA 7 PA 8 RE G I O N A L W A T E R QU A L I T Y ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) 40 T H A V E . PA 4 RE G RE G RE G R IO N IO N N ON O L L AL L AL AL AL AL WA T T WA T WA T T WA T WA T AT ER ER ER E E D DD D D D AAAAALLLLLL ))))) PA 4PA 3 PPPPPA 4 PA 5 PA 6 PA 4 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENLARGEMENT POTENTIAL FUTURE ROAD CONNECTIVITY (FUTURE PHASE) G ENLARGEMENT NT CLEAR CREEK DRIVE I-70 HOOK RAMP PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PUBLIC SIDEWALK PA-4 FULL INTERSECTIONPA-4 C LEAR CREEK DRIVE EN U E PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ENLARGEMENT CLEAR CREEK R R R C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E P VE VE VE VE .. VE PA 1 0 0 TH TH A A V V 0 0 TH TH A A V V AV PPA 1 AAAPPAPPAPPAPAPPAPPAPPPAPPPPPLEWLEWLEWLEWLEWLEWLEWWWLEWLEWOODOODOODOODODODOD GOGOGOGOGOGGOGGGLFLFLFLFLL COUCOUCOUCOUCOORSERSERSERSRSESS NGNGNGNGGGNGNGGGGG: : PPPP: PP::PDDD ERERERERERERRRRRRRRCCCIACIACIAACCCACCCCCLLLLLLL CANCANCANCANANCACANNNCNAANCACANT)T)T)TT)T PA 7 RE G RE G RE R IO N IO N N ON AL AL AL WA T T WA T WA T WA WA ER R ER ER R R QU A QU A QU A U Q Q T LI T LI T LI T Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ZOZONZONZONOZOZONONNZONNZOONOININININININN COCOCOMCOMCOMCOMCOCOMCOMMOOMMOOOOOOMEMEMEMEMMMMMM (V(VA(VAVA(VA(VA(VAVA(VVA((CCCCCCCCCCC RE G RE G E R IO N IO N ON AL AL A WA T WA T WA T A A A W W R ER ER ER QU A QU A QU A A A A QU A U LI T LI T LI T LI T LI T L L Y Y Y Y Y Y PPAR R R A2 L L E E AA R R R C C RR EE EEEEEEEE KK DD RR I I VV EEE C C L L L L E A 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 EEEEEEEE 4 CCCC 4 CCCCCCCCCRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE PUBLIC GATHERING SPACE TRAILHEAD EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL PRIMARY MULTI-USE TRAIL SECONDARY TRAIL PPP MMMM PUBLIC SIDEWALKPPPPPPPPPPP SSSSS PLANNING AREA CONNECTIVITY TRAIL CONNECTIONS SIGNAL NORTH SCALE: 1”=300’ 0 300 600 Trail connections throughout Clear Creek Crossing connect pedestrian and bicyclists to the Districts, emphasizing the underlying theme of the development: the great Colorado outdoors. Fundamental to the culture of the surrounding communities, the trail network links to both the existing Clear Creek Regional Trail as well as the surrounding neighborhoods. 23CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 NEIGHBORHOOD TRAIL CONNECTION *NOT TO SCALE - applies to all graphics on this page. Multi-use trail and sidewalk connections will encourage residents, workers and visitors alike to enjoy the outdoors and stay awhile. With links to Clear Creek as well as connections to the trail connection to Applewood Golf Course planned by the Prospect Recreation and Park District, it is an important amenity to Clear Creek Crossing. Wider than typical and with off site connections, the multi-use trail will be suitable for walkers, cyclists and families and will include wayfi nding signage, benches and natural landscaping. Parking and a small shelter for users will be located at the northern end of Clear Creek Drive, where the network connects to the Clear Creek Regional Trail. Note: Both of the above trail alignment and amenity graphics are conceptual in nature and subject to change pursuant to future approvals by the City of Wheat Ridge NORTH MULTI-USE TRAIL PROPOSED RETAIL PARKING TRAIL MARKER TRAIL CORRIDOR CROSS-SECTION EXISTING POND EXISTING TREES MULTI-USE TRAIL DRAINAGE SWALE CROSSING EXISTING DRAINAGE SWALE PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED RETAIL (HARVEST DISTRICT) EXISTING RESIDENTIAL TRAIL CORRIDOR CROSS-SECTION RETAIL CONNECTION FUTURE CONNECTION TO PROSPECT DISTRICT BY OTHERS CIRCULATION SHADE STRUCTURE PARKING REGIONAL WATER QUALITY EXISTING POND CLEAR CREEK CLE A R C R E E K D R I V E 10’ MULTI-USE TRAIL EXISTING CLEAR CREEK TRAIL EXISTING TREES 6’ SIDEWALK PARALLEL PARKING BIKE RACK & MAP KIOSK SIGN KIOSK CONNECTION TO CLEAR CREEK TRAIL 24CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 ZONING: SF RESIDENTIAL (EXISTING) COORS’ WATER STORAGE MAPLE GROVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PLANNED I-70 HOOK RAMPS PA 1 PA 2 PA 3 PA 4 PA 4 PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 L YOUNGFIELD STREET W 3 2 N D A V E N U E RAILROAD TRAILHEAD ENLARGEMENT C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E PARKING TRAILHEAD MULTI-USE TRAIL APPLEWOOD GOLF COURSE (PROSPECT RECREATION & PARK DISTRICT) POTENTIAL FUTURE CONNECTIVITY (FUTURE PHASE) PA 8 ZZONZONZONZONONONONZONNZONNNNNNONNZNONOONIIIINGINGINGINGNGNNNGINGINGIINGNGNGGGINGINGINGINN: S: S:S: S:S: S: S:SSSS:S:: F RF RF RFFFRF RRRF RF RF RF RF FFFFF RRRRRRRESIEESIESIESIESIESIESISSSSISISISIISIESIESSIESIIESIESISISSESISISSESESSSIIESDENDENDENDEENDENDENDEEENDENENEEDENNDEDEDEENTIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIATIAAAL LLL LLL LLLL L (EX(EX(EX(EX(EX(EX(EX(EX(EX((EX(EX(XXEEXXEX(((ISTISTISTISTISTSSTSISTISTISTISTTISTTTISTTTTISTTTTINGINGINGINGINGNGNNGNINGNGNGNINGINGNGNINGINGINGNGNGINGNNINGN))))))))))))))))) PA 1 PA 2 PA 5 PA 6 PA 7 PA 3 AAAAILHILLILHILH TRAILHEAD ENLARGEMENT REGIONAL WATER QUALITY ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) ZONING: PD COMMERCIAL (VACANT) C L E A R C R E E K D R I V E CLEAR CREEK 40 T H A V E N U E PA 4 4PA 44PA4A 4 0 NU 0 NU T T T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N T T T N N N N N N T T E E E E E E E N N N N N N N N T E E E E E E E N N N N N N E E VE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E VE VE V V V V V V V V V V V H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V VE E E E E E E E E E E E VE V V V V V V V V V V V V V H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V V V V V VE E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E VE V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V V H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A V V V V V V A A A A V V V V V V V EXISTING SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION LIMITED MOVEMENT INTERSECTION ACCESS DRIVE PROPOSED SIGNALIZED FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTION INTERNAL ROAD NETWORK CDOT ‘A’ LINE NORTH 0 300 600 Ensuring fluid vehicular circulation and access into and within the development is integral to the success of the project. Traffi c through Clear Creek Crossing from the planned I-70 hook ramps must be responsibly managed to provide safe traffi c patterns within the areas surrounding the development. Local drives that provide access into individual planning areas will be fi nalized at the time of the Specific Development Plan for each develop- able lot. An update to the 2007 traffi c impact study has been prepared to determine future traffi c impacts and to recommend necessary on-site and off -site infrastructure improvements. VEHICLE CIRCULATION 25CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Signage design for Clear Creek Crossing further introduces the brand into the built environment. The use of synthetic wood juxtaposed with the contemporary and vibrant acrylic and metal elements, further parallels the relationship between the development, the nearby Clear Creek with its natural trails and the agrarian style found throughout the development. Primary design consideration is given to legibility and brand recognition in order to provide viewers with clear direction and a sense of arrival. SIGNAGE 26CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 SIGNAGE Freestanding Signs Clear Creek Crossing site signage allows fl exibility while maintaining a brand identity. Through materials and color palette, the freestanding sign family is inspired by the natural and cultural cues that surround the Site. Building Signage Wall-mounted signs will prioritize legibility and brand recognition, providing clear identifi cation and direction complementary to freestanding signage. Building signage calls for attention to detail, especially at the pedestrian-level and encourages creativity in the Harvest and Vineyard Districts. 27CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 High quality landscaping and urban design will unify Clear Creek Crossing and create a place for the community to gather. Landscape treatment will bring added interest to walkways, entries, parking areas, and open space areas. Site amenities will add layers of interest by inviting visitors to stop and enjoy the outdoors with conveniences such as benches, shade, and bike racks. LANDSCAPE 28WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING RADIATING LINES SIMPLE NATURAL FORM CROP PATTERNS Landscape design inspiration is taken from agrarian land and farming precedents to anchor this project in its rich environmental heritage. Adding to that theme will be a strong focus on creating a naturalized landscape setting that relates closely to Clear Creek and the adjacent foothills. More concentrated urban settings will be developed on the interior of Clear Creek Crossing and will be inspired by this theme. LANDSCAPE INSPIRATION 29CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 In developed areas, raw materials and simple forms will bring unity to the landscape theme. A more naturalized landscape approach is encouraged near the Clear Creek and Trail. Naturalized open space and views will be prioritized wherever feasible. Sustainable, locally appropriate planting and design will be common to the landscape treatment throughout. Overall, the landscape and urban design will focus on creating modern-feeling spaces with a tie to the past using raw, authentic materials. LANDSCAPE IMPLEMENTATION 30CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 SOCIALIZE PLAY Clear Creek Crossing is a special development opportunity, off ering an excellent I-70 location ripe for a mixed use development. With a community-driven approach to sourcing demand, the planned development will become a place as unique and welcoming as its beautiful location, naturally connecting the community to Clear Creek Crossing. LIVE WORK DINE SHOP EXERCISE STAY LIFESTYLE 31CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 Galloway provides you with superior development solutions for retail, commercial, mixed-use, residential, industrial and infrastructure projects. Our unique, collaborative approach provides all key services under one roof in order to streamline the development process and facilitate communication and coordination between project team members. Our comprehensive team consists of the most knowledgeable, dedicated and talented individuals in the industry who truly care about your success. We off er thoughtful, creative design solutions at every stage of the process, and our extensive industry knowledge helps minimize surprises throughout the development process. Evergreen Devco is a fully diversifi ed real estate company with deep experience in retail, commercial and multi-family development, asset management, property management and leasing. The development and consulting company was founded in 1974 by Bruce Pomeroy and Andrew Skipper, and has offi ces in Phoenix, Los Angeles, and Denver and recently expanded into Salt Lake City. Evergreen has completed more than 500 development projects across the United States in more than 175 municipalities. Established in 1985, Norris Design’s strategic partnership in planning, landscape architecture and project promotion encompasses local, regional, national and international projects. We combine responsive service with creative solutions that are grounded in realism to deliver a design that thrives, both today and in the future. Our knowledge and implementation of green building strategies is key to our design process and the success of our projects. Our designs always refl ect our clients’ vision, goals and resources. We take great care to ensure that our solutions can be built and built well, not just for an immediate transformation – but a successful continuum that will continue to unfold. Clients ask us most often if their vision will come to life. At Norris Design we can say “yes” every time. PROJECT TEAM 32CLEAR CREEK CROSSING WHEAT RIDGE, CO | JANUARY, 2018 CLEAR CREEK CROSSING www.cccrossing.com Clear Creek Crossing is envisioned to be unique and authentic in its variety of land uses, architectural style and use of unifying design elements, providing a cohesive experience for residents visitors, workers and shoppers. The project’s design will pay special attention to its public spaces and will respond to the site’s unique shape, historical relevance, topographical features, and both proximity and direct access to freeway corridors. With a strong emphasis placed on the base plane and the connection to Clear Creek and its established regional trail system, Clear Creek Crossing will be a place where a community comes together. SUMMARY Planning Commission Minutes - 1 – January 18, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting January 18, 2018 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair OHM at 7:01 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Alan Bucknam Emery Dorsey Janet Leo Scott Ohm Amanda Weaver Vivian Vos Commission Members Absent: Dirk Boden Donna Kimsey Staff Members Present: Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Scott Brink, Public Works Director Zack Wallace Mendez, Planner II Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried 6-0. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – December 7, 2017 It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to approve the minutes of December 7, 2017, as written. Motion carried 6-0-1 with Commissioner LEO abstaining. ATTACHMENT 3 Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial Formatted: Centered Planning Commission Minutes - 2 – January 18, 2018 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) No one wished to speak at this time. 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WZ-16-07: an application filed by Evergreen-Clear Creek Crossing, LLC, for a zone change from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan, Design Pattern Book and Vision Book on property located west of I-70 between Clear Creek and 34th Avenue (approximately). Mr. Wallace Mendez gave a short presentation regarding the zone change and the application. He entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. He stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked how the bike parking in the Design Patter Book compares to the bicycle parking requirements in the Mixed Use code. Mr. Wallace Mendez said the bike parking regulations are consistent with the Mixed Use code. He added that bike connectivity was extremely important for this site. Commissioner DORSEY asked about the I-70 hook ramp and has concerns about safety and wondered if a hook ramp is necessary. Mr. Brink said the concerns are valid and there have been numerous studies done by CDOT, which included looking at the weave patterns to ensure that I-70 is not adversely impacted. The proposed changes will remove the westbound I-70 entrance from 32nd and Youngfield and re-route through the Clear Creek Crossing site. Commissioner VOS asked what employment use entails compared to retail use. She also asked how many acres are in Clear Creek Crossing (CCC) and how it is broken down in each Planning Area. Mr. Wallace Mendez explained that retail use is primarily where people go to shop and employment use is where people go to work like an office building. He added the total acreage is approximately 109 acres and the acreage in each Planning Area is broken down on page 2 of the ODP. Commissioner VOS also asked about the use list and it being updated. Planning Commission Minutes - 3 – January 18, 2018 Mr. Wallace Mendez explained the uses were originally approved in 2005 when Cabela’s owned the site were largely retail and commercial in nature; then in 2011 it was approved for a smaller Cabela’s and a Super Walmart, the uses mainly limited to retail and commercial. The uses for this proposed rezoning have been expanded to include more employment and residential uses which will be allowed in several districts. Commissioner LEO thought the information provided is very thorough and she is looking forward to seeing the site plan as it moves forward. Commissioner WEAVER asked where most of the traffic comes in and out of the Clear Creek Crossing site, in addition to bike traffic Mr. Brink explained most of the traffic will be coming into the site from I-70. He added that connectivity will be accommodated from all over with bike/pedestrian access and there will also be a transit center for RTD. Commissioner BUCKNAM also wanted to know if PA 5 and PA 6 have been broken apart due to elevation and grade change. Mr. Wallace Mendez and Mr. Johnstone said there will be a tiered design from PA 5 to PA 6 because PA 5 does sit in a hole so there will be a grading transition. Commissioner OHM noted two ballot issues that were approved by voters in 2009 to exempt certain areas of the City from the City Charter’s height and density limits and asked if the Clear Creek Crossing site was located in one of these areas. Mr. Johnstone said CCC is exempt from the charter for height restrictions. Commissioner OHM also asked about the uses not conforming to the Mixed Use Commercial zone district or why not make this site a Mixed Use Transit area. Mr. Johnstone explained the developer is looking for some flexibility due to the fact that this is a challenging site and it is also a highway site which lends itself to a variety of uses. Commissioner OHM also asked what the percentage of total square footage contains residential at the ground floor level. Mr. Johnstone replied that is an unknown right now. Residential uses are allowed in PA 1, 2, and 6, so we don’t know right now exactly where the residential uses will end up, and how much will be built. Mr. Johnstone also noted that another aspect of this project, which is on hold pending approval of the zoning documents, is the determination if this development is part of a public/private deal and if the City will be investing additional dollars into the project. If this is the case, and tax increment financing is utilized that will likely limit the number of residential units Planning Commission Minutes - 4 – January 18, 2018 on the project due to the revenue and taxes generated compared to retail and commercial uses. Tyler Carlson, Evergreen Development, applicant 1873 S. Belair St., Ste. 1200, Denver Mr. Carlson presented a video before his presentation which provided the developer’s vision for the CCC site. Mr. Carlson explained that a number of man hours and money have gone into transitioning this property to a long term community asset and to create a mixed use environment. He gave some history of the site and the phasing of its improvements. The vision is to make this a great mixed use community that is synergistic and symbiotic. He also explained that another goal is to improve connectivity in the community through circulation and through the physical inter-connectivity with RTD and existing and proposed trail systems. Mr. Carlson then gave a brief description about each of the Planning Areas and answered Commissioner VOS’ question about who the owner of PA 8 will be. He said the owner is Long’s Peak Metro District and it will strictly be open space. Commissioner VOS has concerns about views being blocked for people on the east side of the highway and the light that the site will generate at night from signage and parking lights. She also has concerns about some of the businesses being in operation 24/7. Mr. Carlson explained that there is strict parking lot lighting standards that will be finalized with staff and will require downward lit low profile fixtures; it will be less light intrusive than the Applewood Shopping Center across I-70. The signage will follow the building frontage and will dictate the size of the signage. The signs will be on at night, but again the properties across I-70 are commercial and not residential so their lights will be on as well. Mr. Carlson addressed the 24/7 concern and said because this site is located adjacent to a highway some business will be open 24/7, for example, fueling stations and some restaurants. This project will impact people’s lives, maybe good and bad, but what is being proposed is less intrusive than other developments. Max Stich, 1000 East 16th Avenue, Denver Legal Counsel for Lutheran Hospital Mr. Stich said the few points he wants to make are in regards to the health, safety and welfare of the community. First, he said the uses for PA 1 were not listed in the original packet submitted to the neighborhood. He felt the neighborhood could not respond because hospital use was not included. The second point Mr. Stich wanted to address is that a portion of PA1 is in the 100 year flood plain and per code a hospital cannot be built in a 100 year flood plain. He also stated that most Planning Commission Minutes - 5 – January 18, 2018 of PA1 is within the 500 year flood plain and it is recommended by the EPA, but not required that the community regulate a hospital in a flood plain to promote the health and safety of the community. He stated the hospital use needed to be looked at more critically in terms of lighting, traffic, and noise. He suggested hospitals be removed from PA 1 or the decision be stayed until the community is informed of the proposed hospital use. Carol Salzmann, 8300 West 38th Avenue, Wheat Ridge VP of Community and Government Affairs at Lutheran Medical Center Ms. Salzmann said she would like to see a delay on the Clear Creek Crossing zone change because Lutheran was notified of a possible hospital use at CCC just two weeks before this meeting and there has been no opportunity to figure out the impact this will have on the hospital, its employees, and community partners. In speaking on behalf of Lutheran, she stated they believe in economic development in the City, but are concerned about the proposed hospital use, and wants more time to review and understand the impacts this may have on the largest employer in Wheat Ridge. She did state she likes the rest of the CCC proposal and believes it will be welcomed in the community. Bruce Waring, 3320 Oak Street, Wheat Ridge Resident Mr. Waring stated he likes the overall contribution of this project to the community. He is concerned about the broad change in the zone change uses because of the possible duplication of the hospital uses in the community. Mr. Carlson replied to some of the public’s comments and stated that in December of 2016 when Evergreen development closed on this site the main anchor was Walmart, which also had concerns from the neighbors. In June of 2017 Walmart pulled out of the deal, which from a development perspective was catastrophic to the project, due to the large amount of infrastructure that needs to be build, which is difficult without an anchor tenant. During the search for a new retail anchor there was zero interest, so the search moved to the employment sector and Evergreen was approached by multiple health care systems interested in this site. Mr. Carlson explained that hospitals have been beneficial to regional centers like this proposal, and cited a few examples around the metro area. Mr. Carlson also explained this is an appropriate site for a hospital because of the highway access with no single family homes adjacent to the PA1 site. He also added the hospital use for this site has always been proposed as a permitted use. In response to PA1 being in the 100 year flood plain, he stated that is an incorrect statement, but it does sit in the 500 year flood plain. If a hospital does come in, it will be up to them if they want to change the grading to take the hospital out of the flood plain and comply with the recommendations of the State. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked to see a slide of the flood plain for this site. Planning Commission Minutes - 6 – January 18, 2018 Mr. Carlson pulled up a slide from his presentation and explained the 100 year flood plain is primarily contained in the Wagon district, PA8, and only touched PA1 by a couple of feet. Commissioner VOS proposed a motion for continuance for two reasons: 1) The use schedule hasn’t been publicized to the neighborhood in a neighborhood meeting and, 2) 24/7 facilities not be in the use chart. There was not a second to this motion so it failed. Mr. Johnstone spoke about the neighborhood meeting which occurred in the fall of 2016 and its purpose was to gather broad noticing of 600 feet around the site which is then given high level information about a possible application submittal. The application was submitted in December of 2016 with a hospital being listed as a permitted use. Mr. Johnstone added there was no improper disclosure of when hospitals became a permitted use in the proposed ODP. There was then additional discussion about a hospital being a conditional use compared to a permitted use. Mr. Johnstone added that a conditional use is an administrative review and to make it a conditional use will make it difficult for the developer to market the property moving forward, as the use would be discretionary. Conditional uses are currently contemplated in the Mixed Use zone districts as uses they may have different vehicular patterns that are appropriate to regulate a little more closely. Mr. Johnstone added it would be complicated process for both Staff and the developer to advise a major medical user if they are going to build a multi-million dollar hospital, when the use is up to discretion, they won’t take that risk. Mr. Johnstone said he understood the concern being raised, but thinks the Conditional Use Permit process as a practical solution deserves much more discussion. Commissioner BUCKNAM said he does not feel hospital use should be excluded from the list of uses. It would be easy to grade the property to get it out of the 500 year flood plain and believes it is up to the market to decide if Wheat Ridge needs another hospital. He added that from a planning perspective, a hospital on this site would be appropriate. Commissioner LEO understands all the hospital concerns but thinks the Commission should concentrate on the zone change. Commissioner OHM discussed adding a condition to the motion for 50% of ground floor level being nonresidential for the entire site. There was discussion with Mr. Carlson and staff on the intent on nonresidential at the ground floor level. Mr. Johnstone agreed staff will work on the language before it is presented to City Council. Planning Commission Minutes - 7 – January 18, 2018 It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to recommend APPROVAL of Case no. WZ-16-07, a request for approval of a zone change from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) for property located west of Interstate 70 between Clear Creek and 34th Avenue, approximately, for the following reasons; 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, which calls for a Regional Commercial Center on the site. 3. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of adoption of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, namely a more diverse mix of uses which responds to market demands, mitigates transportation impacts, and yields a more robust development. 4. The proposed zoning includes a circulation network that supports the City’s goals related to bicycle and pedestrian connectivity, 5. The proposed zoning establishes enhanced design controls related to site design, building design, materials, and landscaping that will result in a high-quality development. 6. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request. With the following conditions: 1. There be an addition of maximum residential height of 65 feet in PA1. 2. At least 50% of the proposed total square footage at the ground floor level shall contain nonresidential uses across all Planning Areas. Motion carried 5-1 with Commissioner VOS voting against. 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS 10. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner LEO to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Planning Commission Minutes - 8 – January 18, 2018 Motion passed 6-0. __________________________ _______________________________ Scott Ohm, Chair Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL 04-2018 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 11-291 AND 11-401 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, CONCERNING THE AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES OF MARIJUANA TESTING FACILITIES PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (2/12/2018) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (3/12/2018) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________ ______________________________ City Attorney City Manager ISSUE: Council Bill 04-2018 authorizes City-licensed marijuana testing facilities to conduct all marijuana testing activities authorized by state law. Other types of activities, such as cultivation, product development and clinical trials, are still prohibited within testing facilities in the City. PRIOR ACTION: At the December 18, 2017 Study Session, City Council provided consensus to bring forward an ordinance that allows marijuana “testing facilities” to conduct a broader array of testing activities than is currently permitted by local law. The new array of testing activities that would be allowed are only those that state law currently defines, regulates and permits. FINANCIAL IMPACT: No financial impact is projected. BACKGROUND: During the 2017 legislative session, the state legislature adopted House Bill 17-1367, creating and authorizing two (2) new types of marijuana-related licenses: the “research and development” license and the “research and development cultivation” license. The new “research and development” license authorizes its holder to conduct a variety of activities, including the testing of marijuana, conducting clinical trials and investigations, and researching the efficacy and safety of marijuana as a medical treatment. Council Action Form – Authorized Activities of Marijuana Testing Facilities February 12, 2018 Page 2 The City currently allows and licenses “marijuana testing facilities” within the City. These City testing facilities are currently authorized to conduct only those activities that the state allows state-licensed “testing facilities” to conduct. HB 17-1367 allows the new “research and development” licenses to conduct additional types of testing activities. On December 18, 2017 the Council discussed the possibilities of authorizing additional marijuana testing activities in the City and/or authorizing “research and development” licenses in the City. Consensus of Council that evening was that no additional local license types are currently desired. Council expressed that it should consider permitting City “testing facilities” – a license type already locally allowed – to conduct the full gamut of testing activities authorized by state law, whether authorized under state law to “testing” licenses or to “research and development” licenses, under the state’s nomenclature. Council further directed that the draft ordinance make clear that any other activities authorized by state law to occur in “research and development” facilities – such as clinical trials, cultivation of marijuana, research projects – remain prohibited in City testing facilities. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the ordinance on first reading. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Council Bill 04-2018, an ordinance amending sections 11-291 and 11-401 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning the authorized activities of marijuana testing facilities, on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, March 12, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and that it take effect fifteen (15) days after final publication.” Or, “I move to postpone indefinitely Council Bill 04-2018, an ordinance amending sections 11-291 and 11-401 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, concerning the authorized activities of marijuana testing facilities, for the following reason(s)_________________________________________.” REPORT PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY: Carmen Beery, City Attorney’s Office Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill 04-2018 2. HB 17-1367 1 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. 04 Ordinance No. _________ Series 2018 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 11-291 AND 11-401 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, CONCERNING THE AUTHORIZED ACTIVITIES OF MARIJUANA TESTING FACILITIES WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge (“City”) is a home rule municipality operating under a charter adopted pursuant to Article XX of the Colorado Constitution and vested with the authority by that article and the Colorado Revised Statutes to adopt ordinances for the regulation of land use and the protection of the public health, safety and welfare; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority granted by Section 14, Article XVIII and Section 16, Article XVIII of the Colorado Constitution, the Colorado Retail Marijuana Code, Article 43.4, Title 12, C.R.S., and the Colorado Medical Marijuana Code, Article 43.3, Title 12, C.R.S., the Wheat Ridge City Council (“Council”) previously adopted local regulations governing marijuana establishments; and WHEREAS, such regulations, codified in part under Articles XII and XIII, respectively, of Chapter 11 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (“Code”), authorize the location and conduct of marijuana “testing facilities” within the City; and WHEREAS, during the 2017 legislative session, the Colorado legislature adopted House Bill 17-1367, creating and authorizing two new types of marijuana-related licenses, the “research and development” license and the “research and development cultivation” license; and WHEREAS, the newly-created “research and development” license authorizes its holder to conduct a variety of activities, including the testing of marijuana, conducting clinical trials and investigations, and researching the efficacy and safety of marijuana as a medical treatment; and WHEREAS, the Council finds that the testing activities authorized by “research and development” licenses, under state law, are consistent and compatible with the testing activities that the City currently permits to be conducted by “testing facilities” within the City; and WHEREAS, the Council further finds that all other types of activities authorized by “research and development” licenses under state law, such as research, product development and clinical trials, are inconsistent and incompatible with the testing activities that City-licensed “testing facilities” may conduct; and ATTACHMENT 1 2 WHEREAS, the Council therefore wishes to authorize City-licensed “testing facilities” to also conduct only those testing activities authorized by state law to be undertaken by the new “research and development” licenses created by HB 17-1367. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 11-291 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (“Code”), concerning definitions applicable to medical marijuana establishment licensing, is hereby amended by the following amendment to the existing definition: Medical marijuana testing facility shall mean a premises licensed TO TEST MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA—INFUSED PRODUCTS pursuant to the Colorado Medical Marijuana Code to operate a business as described by C.R.S. § 12-43.3-405 (MEDICAL MARIJUANA TESTING LICENSE) AND/OR C.R.S. § 12-43.3-408(1)(A) (MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE). NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF THE COLORADO MEDICAL MARIJUANA CODE, OR THE RULES PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, TO THE CONTRARY, SUCH FACILITIES MAY CONDUCT TESTING ACTIVITIES ONLY; ANY OTHER ACTIVITY PERMITTED IN SUCH FACILITIES BY STATE LAW OR RULE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CULTIVATION, RESEARCH, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND CLINICAL TRAILS, ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. Section 2. Section 11-401 of the Code, concerning definitions applicable to retail marijuana establishment licensing, is hereby amended by the following amendments to two (2) existing definitions set forth thereunder: Medical marijuana testing facility shall mean a premises licensed TO TEST MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA—INFUSED PRODUCTS pursuant to the Colorado Medical Marijuana Code to operate a business as described by C.R.S. § 12-43.3-405 (MEDICAL MARIJUANA TESTING LICENSE) AND/OR C.R.S. § 12-43.3-408(1)(A) (MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE). NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF THE COLORADO MEDICAL MARIJUANA CODE, OR THE RULES PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, TO THE CONTRARY, SUCH FACILITIES MAY CONDUCT TESTING ACTIVITIES ONLY; ANY OTHER ACTIVITY PERMITTED IN SUCH FACILITIES BY STATE LAW OR RULE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CULTIVATION, RESEARCH, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND CLINICAL TRIALS AND INVESTIGATIONS, ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. 3 Retail marijuana testing facility means a person PREMISES licensed TO TEST MARIJUANA AND MARIJUANA—INFUSED PRODUCTS pursuant to the Colorado Retail Marijuana Code to operate a business as described in C.R.S. § 12-43.4-405 (RETAIL MARIJUANA TESTING LICENSE) AND/OR C.R.S. § 12-43.3-408(1)(A) (MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE). NOTWITHSTANDING ANY PROVISION OF THE COLORADO MEDICAL MARIJUANA CODE, THE COLORADO RETAIL MARIJUANA CODE, OR THE RULES PROMULGATED THEREUNDER, TO THE CONTRARY, SUCH FACILITIES MAY CONDUCT TESTING ACTIVITIES ONLY; ANY OTHER ACTIVITY PERMITTED IN SUCH FACILITIES BY STATE LAW OR RULE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO CULTIVATION, RESEARCH, PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND CLINICAL TRIALS AND INVESTIGATIONS, ARE EXPRESSLY PROHIBITED. Section 3. Severability, Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of ___ to _____ on this _____ day of ____________, 2018, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge, and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for ___________ , 2018, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of ___ to ___, this _____ day of ______________, 2018. SIGNED by the Mayor on this _____ day of ____________, 2018. _________________________ Bud Starker, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________ Janelle Shaver, City Clerk 4 Approved as to Form _________________________ Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney First Publication: Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: HOUSE BILL 17-1367 BY REPRESENTATIVE(S) Pabon and Arndt, Ginal, Gray, Hansen, Herod, Hooton, Jackson, Kennedy, Kraft-Tharp, Lebsock, Lontine, Melton, Michaelson Jenet, Pettersen, Rosenthal, Singer, Duran; also SENATOR(S) Jahn and Baumgardner, Coram, Crowder, Hill, Holbert, Kefalas, Neville T., Smallwood, Sonnenberg, Grantham. CONCERNING MARIJUANA RESEARCH AUTHORIZATION, AND, IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, MAKING AN APPROPRIATION. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Colorado: SECTION 1. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-43.3-202, amend (2)(a) introductory portion, (2)(a)(XX), and (2)(a)(XXI); and add (2)(a)(XXII) as follows: 12-43.3-202. Powers and duties of state licensing authority - rules. (2) (a) Rules promulgated pursuant to p-aragr p • 1 ii (±) SUBSECTION (1)(b) of this section may include, but need not be limited to, the following subjects: (XX) Such other matters as are necessary for the fair, impartial, stringent, and comprehensive administration of this arti‘..le,a,1d ARTICLE 43.3; Capital letters indicate new material added to existing statutes; dashes through words indicate deletions from existing statutes and such material not part of act. ATTACHMENT 2 (XXI) The parameters and qualifications of an indirect beneficial interest owner and a qualified limited passive investor; (XXII) MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSES AND MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSES, INCLUDING APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS; RENEWAL REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING WHETHER ADDITIONAL RESEARCH PROJECTS MAY BE ADDED OR CONSIDERED; CONDITIONS FOR LICENSE REVOCATION; SECURITY MEASURES TO ENSURE MARIJUANA IS NOT DIVERTED TO PURPOSES OTHER THAN RESEARCH; THE AMOUNT OF PLANTS, USEABLE MARIJUANA, MARIJUANA CONCENTRATES, OR MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCTS A LICENSEE MAY HAVE ON ITS PREMISES; LICENSEE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS; THE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH MARIJUANA POSSESSED BY MEDICAL MARIJUANA LICENSEES MAY BE DONATED TO MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEES AND MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEES; PROVISIONS TO PREVENT CONTAMINATION; REQUIREMENTS FOR DESTRUCTION OF MARIJUANA AFTER THE RESEARCH IS CONCLUDED; AND ANY ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. SECTION 2. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-43.3-301, amend (1)(d); and add (1)(g) and (1)(h) as follows: 12-43.3-301. Local licensing authority - applications - licenses. (1) A local licensing authority may issue only the following medical marijuana licenses upon payment of the fee and compliance with all local licensing requirements to be determined by the local licensing authority: (d) A medical marijuana testing facility license; and (g) A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE; AND (h) A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSE. SECTION 3. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-43.3-401, amend (1) introductory portion; and add (1)(g) and (1)(h) as follows: 12-43.3-401. Classes of licenses. (1) For the purpose of regulating the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, and sale of medical marijuana, PAGE 2-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 the state licensing authority in its discretion, upon application in the prescribed form made to it, may issue and grant to the applicant a license from any ofthe following classes, subject to the provisions and restrictions provided by this aitia., ARTICLE 43.3: (g) MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE; AND (h) MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSE. SECTION 4. In Colorado Revised Statutes, add 12-43.3-409 as follows: 12-43.3-409. Marijuana research and development license - marijuana research and development cultivation license - definition. (1) (a) A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE MAY BE ISSUED TO A PERSON TO POSSESS MARIJUANA FOR THE LIMITED RESEARCH PURPOSES IDENTIFIED IN SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION. (b) A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSE MAY BE ISSUED TO A PERSON TO GROW, CULTIVATE, POSSESS, AND TRANSFER, BY SALE OR DONATION, MARIJUANA PURSUANT TO SECTION 12-43.3-202 (2)(a)(XXII) OR SUBSECTION (4) OF THIS SECTION FOR THE LIMITED RESEARCH PURPOSES IDENTIFIED IN SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION. (2) A LICENSE IDENTIFIED IN SUBSECTION (1) OF THIS SECTION MAY BE ISSUED FOR THE FOLLOWING LIMITED RESEARCH PURPOSES: (a) To TEST CHEMICAL POTENCY AND COMPOSITION LEVELS; (b) TO CONDUCT CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF MARIJUANA-DERIVED MEDICINAL PRODUCTS; (c) To CONDUCT RESEARCH ON THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF ADMINISTERING MARIJUANA AS PART OF MEDICAL TREATMENT; (d) To CONDUCT GENOMIC, HORTICULTURAL, OR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH; AND PAGE 3-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 (e) To CONDUCT RESEARCH ON MARIJUANA-AFFILIATED PRODUCTS OR SYSTEMS. (3) (a) As PART OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS FOR A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSE, AN APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT TO THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY A DESCRIPTION OF THE RESEARCH THAT THE APPLICANT INTENDS TO CONDUCT AND WHETHER THE RESEARCH WILL BE CONDUCTED WITH A PUBLIC INSTITUTION OR USING PUBLIC MONEY. IF THE RESEARCH WILL NOT BE CONDUCTED WITH A PUBLIC INSTITUTION OR WITH PUBLIC MONEY, THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY SHALL GRANT THE APPLICATION IF IT DETERMINES THAT THE APPLICATION MEETS THE CRITERIA IN SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION. (b) IF THE RESEARCH WILL BE CONDUCTED WITH A PUBLIC INSTITUTION OR PUBLIC MONEY, THE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COUNCIL ESTABLISHED IN SECTION 25-1.5-106.5 (3) SHALL REVIEW AN APPLICANT'S RESEARCH PROJECT TO DETERMINE THAT IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION AND TO ASSESS THE FOLLOWING: (I) THE PROJECT'S QUALITY, STUDY DESIGN, VALUE, OR IMPACT; (II) WHETHER THE APPLICANT HAS THE APPROPRIATE PERSONNEL; EXPERTISE; FACILITIES; INFRASTRUCTURE; FUNDING; AND HUMAN, ANIMAL, OR OTHER APPROVALS IN PLACE TO SUCCESSFULLY CONDUCT THE PROJECT; AND (III) WHETHER THE AMOUNT OF MARIJUANA TO BE GROWN BY THE APPLICANT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROJECT'S SCOPE AND GOALS. (c) IF THE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COUNCIL DETERMINES THAT THE RESEARCH PROJECT DOES NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SUBSECTION (2) OF THIS SECTION OR ASSESSES THE CRITERIA IN THIS SUBSECTION (3) TO BE INADEQUATE, THE APPLICATION MUST BE DENIED. (4) A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEE MAY ONLY TRANSFER, BY SALE OR DONATION, MARIJUANA GROWN WITHIN ITS OPERATION TO OTHER MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEES OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEES. THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY MAY REVOKE PAGE 4-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSE FOR VIOLATIONS OF THIS SUBSECTION (4) AND ANY OTHER VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE 43.3. (5) A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEE OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEE MAY CONTRACT TO PERFORM RESEARCH IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION RESEARCH INSTITUTION OR ANOTHER MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEE OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEE. (6) THE GROWING, CULTIVATING, POSSESSING, OR TRANSFERRING, BY SALE OR DONATION, OF MARIJUANA IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION AND THE RULES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO IT, BY A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEE OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEE, IS NOT A CRIMINAL OR CIVIL OFFENSE UNDER STATE LAW. A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSE OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSE MUST BE ISSUED IN THE NAME OF THE APPLICANT AND MUST SPECIFY THE LOCATION IN COLORADO AT WHICH THE MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEE OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEE INTENDS TO OPERATE. A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEE OR. MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEE SHALL NOT ALLOW ANY OTHER PERSON TO EXERCISE THE PRIVILEGE OF THE LICENSE. (7) IF THE RESEARCH CONDUCTED INCLUDES A PUBLIC INSTITUTION OR PUBLIC MONEY, THE SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COUNCIL SHALL REVIEW ANY REPORTS MADE BY MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEES AND MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEES UNDER STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY RULE AND PROVIDE THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY WITH ITS DETERMINATION ON WHETHER THE RESEARCH PROJECT CONTINUES TO MEET RESEARCH QUALIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. SECTION 5. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-43.3405, amend (1) as follows: 12-43.3-405. Medical marijuana testing facility license - rules. (1) A medical marijuana testing facility license may be issued to a person PAGE 5-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 who performs testing and research on medical marijuana for medical marijuana licensees, MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCTS FOR MARIJUANA AND RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT LICENSEES AND MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEES, AND MARIJUANA OR MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCTS GROWN OR PRODUCED BY A REGISTERED PATIENT OR REGISTERED PRIMARY CAREGIVER ON BEHALF OF A REGISTERED PATIENT, UPON VERIFICATION OF REGISTRATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-1.5-106 (7)(e) AND VERIFICATION THAT THE PATIENT IS A PARTICIPANT IN A CLINICAL OR OBSERVATIONAL STUDY CONDUCTED BY A MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT LICENSEE OR MARIJUANA RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CULTIVATION LICENSEE. The facility may develop and test medical marijuana products. SECTION 6. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 25-1.5-106.5, amend (5) as follows: 25-1.5-106.5. Medical marijuana health research grant program. (5) Sources of marijuana. (a) The attorney general shall seek authority from the federal government to permit Colorado institutions of higher education to contract with the national institute of drug abuse to cultivate marijuana and its component parts for use in research studies funded pursuant to this section. (b) A PERSON WHO HOLDS AN OPTIONAL PREMISES CULTIVATION LICENSE OR MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING LICENSE ISSUED PURSUANT TO PART 4 OF ARTICLE 43.3 OF TITLE 12 OR A RETAIL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION FACILITY LICENSE OR A RETAIL MARIJUANA PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING LICENSE ISSUED PURSUANT TO PART 4 OF ARTICLE 43.4 OF TITLE 12 MAY TRANSFER MARIJUANA TO A MEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY, INCLUDING AT AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION, FOR USE IN RESEARCH STUDIES FUNDED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, A MEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO CONDUCT MEDICAL RESEARCH REGARDING MARIJUANA IS EXEMPT FROM ALL OTHERWISE APPLICABLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE POSSESSION AND USE OF MARIJUANA; EXCEPT THAT THE FACILITY SHALL USE THE MARIJUANA ONLY FOR THE MEDICAL RESEARCH AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION, SHALL NOT POSSESS AT ANY TIME A QUANTITY OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA OR MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCT IN EXCESS OF THE LIMIT PAGE 6-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 ESTABLISHED IN RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY, AND SHALL DESTROY ALL MARIJUANA REMAINING AFTER THE RESEARCH HAS BEEN COMPLETED. FOR THE FISCAL YEARS BEGINNING ON OR AFTER JULY 1, 2017, THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY MAY ANNUALLY APPROPRIATE UP TO ONE PERCENT OF THE AVAILABLE MONEY IN THE MARIJUANA TAX CASH FUND CREATED IN SECTION 39-28.8-501 TO THE DEPARTMENT TO BE USED TO AWARD GRANTS PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION TO MEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITIES SO THAT A FACILITY MAY: (I) PURCHASE MARIJUANA FROM A LICENSEE SPECIFIED IN THIS SUBSECTION (5)(b) THAT WILL BE USED IN THE RESEARCH; AND (II) CONDUCT THE MEDICAL RESEARCH. SECTION 7. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-43.3-202, amend (1)(h) and (2.5)(a) introductory portion; and add (2.5)(a)(I)(G) as follows: 12-43.3-202. Powers and duties of state licensing authority - rules. (1) The state licensing authority shall: (h) Develop and maintain a seed-to-sale tracking system that tracks medical marijuana from either the seed or immature plant stage until the medical marijuana or medical marijuana-infused product is sold to a customer at a medical marijuana center to ensure that no medical marijuana grown or processed by a medical marijuana establishment is sold or otherwise transferred except by a medical marijuana center; EXCEPT THAT THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA OR MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCT IS NO LONGER SUBJECT TO THE TRACKING SYSTEM ONCE THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA OR MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCT HAS BEEN: (I) TRANSFERRED TO A MEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-1.5-106.5 (5)(b); OR (H) TRANSFERRED TO A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER IN QUANTITIES THAT ARE LIMITED AS SPECIFIED IN RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENTS OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AND AGRICULTURE. THE RULES MUST DEFINE A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT RESEARCH AND MUST AUTHORIZE A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER TO CONDUCT RESEARCH TO ESTABLISH SAFE AND EFFECTIVE PROTOCOLS FOR PAGE 7-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 THE USE OF PESTICIDES ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (1)(h)(II) TO CONDUCT PESTICIDE RESEARCH REGARDING MARIJUANA MUST BE LOCATED IN COLORADO, MUST CONDUCT THE RESEARCH IN COLORADO, AND IS EXEMPT FROM ALL OTHERWISE APPLICABLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE POSSESSION AND USE OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA OR MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCT; EXCEPT THAT THE MANUFACTURER SHALL: (A) NOT POSSESS AT ANY TIME A QUANTITY OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA OR MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCT IN EXCESS OF THE LIMIT ESTABLISHED IN RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY; (B) USE THE MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCT ONLY FOR THE PESTICIDE RESEARCH AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (1)(h)(II); (C) DESTROY, IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY, ALL MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCT REMAINING AFTER THE RESEARCH HAS BEEN COMPLETED; AND (D) NOT APPLY PESTICIDES FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ON THE LICENSED PREMISES OF A MEDICAL MARIJUANA BUSINESS. (2.5) (a) Rules promulgated pursuant to paiagap (I)) .,f su stA,tiUir (I-) SUBSECTION (1)(b) of this section must include, but need not be limited to, the following subjects: (I) (G) A STATE, LOCAL, OR MUNICIPAL AGENCY SHALL NOT EMPLOY OR USE THE RESULTS OF ANY TEST OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA OR MEDICAL MARIJUANA-INFUSED PRODUCTS CONDUCTED BY AN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY THAT IS NOT CERTIFIED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (2.5)(a)(I) FOR THE PARTICULAR TESTING CATEGORY AND ACCREDITED TO THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION/INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION 17025:2005 STANDARD, OR ANY SUBSEQUENT SUPERSEDING STANDARD, IN THAT FIELD OF TESTING. PAGE 8-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 SECTION 8. In Colorado Revised Statutes, 12-43.4-202, amend (1) and (3)(a) introductory portion; and add (3)(a)(IV)(H) as follows: 12-43.4-202. Powers and duties of state licensing authority - rules. (1) To ENSURE THAT NO MARIJUANA GROWN OR PROCESSED BY A RETAIL MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT IS SOLE) OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT BY A RETAIL MARIJUANA STORE OR AS AUTHORIZED BY LAW, the state licensing authority shall develop and maintain a seed-to-sale tracking system that tracks retail marijuana from either seed or immature plant stage until the marijuana or retail marijuana product is sold to a customer at a retail marijuana store, to-L,Lib tn. ,..,that-ntrmarijtrana-gr awn-orproccs s erl-by a-Tetail-marijuana-e-stablishmcntis-scrld-or othenvise-transferred-except-by a-rttai-Hrrarij-trarra-stort: EXCEPT THAT RETAIL MARIJUANA OR RETAIL MARIJUANA PRODUCT IS NO LONGER SUBJECT TO THE TRACKING SYSTEM ONCE THE RETAIL MARIJUANA HAS BEEN: (a) TRANSFERRED TO A MEDICAL RESEARCH FACILITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 25-1.5-106.5 (5)(b); OR (b) TRANSFERRED TO A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER IN QUANTITIES THAT ARE LIMITED AS SPECIFIED IN RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY, IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENTS OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AND AGRICULTURE. THE RULES MUST DEFINE A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER THAT IS AUTHORIZED TO CONDUCT RESEARCH AND MUST AUTHORIZE A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER TO CONDUCT RESEARCH TO ESTABLISH SAFE AND EFFECTIVE PROTOCOLS FOR THE USE OF PESTICIDES ON RETAIL MARIJUANA. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, A PESTICIDE MANUFACTURER AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (1)(b) TO CONDUCT PESTICIDE RESEARCH REGARDING RETAIL MARIJUANA MUST BE LOCATED IN COLORADO, MUST CONDUCT THE RESEARCH IN COLORADO, AND IS EXEMPT FROM ALL OTHERWISE APPLICABLE RESTRICTIONS ON THE POSSESSION AND USE OF RETAIL MARIJUANA; EXCEPT THAT THE MANUFACTURER SHALL: (I) NOT POSSESS AT ANY TIME A QUANTITY OF RETAIL MARIJUANA IN EXCESS OF THE LIMIT ESTABLISHED IN RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY; (II) USE THE RETAIL MARIJUANA ONLY FOR THE PESTICIDE RESEARCH AUTHORIZED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (1)(b); PAGE 9-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 (III) DESTROY, IN COMPLIANCE WITH RULES PROMULGATED BY THE STATE LICENSING AUTHORITY, ALL RETAIL MARIJUANA REMAINING AFTER THE RESEARCH HAS BEEN COMPLETED; AND (IV) NOT APPLY PESTICIDES FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES ON THE LICENSED PREMISES OF A RETAIL MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT. (3) (a) Rules promulgated pursuant to-paragrap bsectiorr (2) SUBSECTION (2)(b) of this section must include, but need not be limited to, the following subjects: (IV) (H) A STATE, LOCAL, OR MUNICIPAL AGENCY SHALL NOT EMPLOY OR USE THE RESULTS OF ANY TEST OF MARIJUANA OR MARIJUANA PRODUCTS CONDUCTED BY AN ANALYTICAL LABORATORY THAT IS NOT CERTIFIED PURSUANT TO THIS SUBSECTION (3)(a)(1V) FOR THE PARTICULAR TESTING CATEGORY AND ACCREDITED TO THE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION/INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION 17025:2005 STANDARD, OR ANY SUBSEQUENT SUPERSEDING STANDARD, IN THAT FIELD OF TESTING. SECTION 9. Appropriation. (1) For the 2017-18 state fiscal year, $62,210 is appropriated to the department of revenue. This appropriation is from the marijuana cash fund created in section 12-43.3-501 (1)(a), C.R.S. To implement this act, the department may use this appropriation as follows: (a) $43,200 for marijuana enforcement; and (b) $19,010 for the purchase of legal services. (2) For the 2017-18 state fiscal year, $19,010 is appropriated to the department of law. This appropriation is from reappropriated funds received from the department of revenue under subsection (1)(b) of this section and is based on an assumption that the department of law will require an additional 0.1 FTE. To implement this act, the department of law may use this appropriation to provide legal services for the department of revenue. SECTION 10. Appropriation. (1) For the 2017-18 state fiscal year, $164,461 is appropriated to the department of revenue. This PAGE 10-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 appropriation is from the marijuana cash fund created in section 12-43.3-501 (1)(a), C.R.S. To implement this act, the department may use this appropriation as follows: (a) $78,421 for marijuana enforcement, which amount is based on an assumption that the department will require an additional 0.5 FTE; (b) $10,000 for tax administration IT system (GenTax) support; and (c) $76,040 for the purchase of legal services. (2) For the 2017-18 state fiscal year, $76,040 is appropriated to the department of law. This appropriation is from reappropriated funds received from the department of revenue under subsection (1)(c) of this section and is based on an assumption that the department of law will require an additional 0.4 FTE. To implement this act, the department of law may use this appropriation to provide legal services for the department of revenue. SECTION II. Act subject to petition - effective date - applicability. (1) Sections 1 through 5, section 10, and this section 11 of this act take effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly (August 9, 2017, if adjournment sine die is on May 10, 2017); except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V ofthe state constitution against section 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, or 11 of this act within such period, then the section or sections will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2018 and, in such case, will take effect on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor. (2) (a) Sections 6 through 9 of this act take effect January 1, 2018; except that, if a referendum petition is filed pursuant to section 1 (3) of article V of the state constitution against section 6, 7, 8, or 9 of this act within the ninety-day period after final adjournment of the general assembly, the section or sections will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in November 2018 and, in such case, will take effect on January 1, 2019, or on the date of the official declaration of the vote thereon by the governor, whichever is later. PAGE 11-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 Crisanta Duran SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Kevin J. Grantham PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE M lyn Ed CHIEF CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Effie Ameen SECRETARY OF THE SENATE (b) Sections 6 through 9 of this act apply to conduct occurring on or after the applicable effective date of this act. APPROVED John W. Hickenlooper GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PAGE 12-HOUSE BILL 17-1367 Af4fr/.. N.17 f_T1 ‘16 tni 10I _ John W. Hickenlooper Governor STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR 136 State Capitol Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone (303) 866-2471 Fax (303) 866-2003 June 7, 2017 The Honorable Colorado House of Representatives General Assembly State Capitol 200 E. Colfax Ave. Denver, CO 80203 Dear Members of the Colorado House of Representatives: Today, we filed with the Secretary of State House Bill 17-1367, "Concerning Marijuana Research Authorization" (HB 17-1367). As I am neither signing nor vetoing HB 17-1367, the bill's provisions will take effect on the applicable effective dates set out in the bill. This letter sets forth my reasons for allowing HB 17-1367 to become law absent my signature. HB 17-1367 creates a new license type for entities using marijuana for research purposes, provides the Marijuana Enforcement Division (MED) rulemaking authority, and makes changes to medical and recreational marijuana testing. We take no issue with the bill's goals. However, there is one critical matter that should be addressed. Sections 7 and 8 of HB 17-1367 both provide that: (Al (Sitate, local, or municipal agency shall not employ or use the results of any test of marijuana or marijuana products conducted by an analytical laboratory that is not certified pursuant to this subsection (3)(a)(IV) for the particular testing category and accredited to the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission 17025:2005 standard. or any subsequent superseding standard, in that field of testing (emphasis added). During FIB 17-1367's consideration, multiple amendments were added in the final days of session. As part of one amendment, the word "and" (emphasized above) was inserted to replace the word "or." We confirmed with the sponsors this change was unintended. However, the change has significant implications. Due to this change, no state or local agency may use or employ test results from a lab not certified by the Department of Revenue (DOR), and accredited to the International Organization for Standardization/International Electrotechnical Commission (ISO Accredited). At present, only two testing facilities in the State meet both requirements. Consequently, this provision will limit the MED's ability to rely on test results for regulatory and enforcement purposes. During the brief period between the effective date of January 1, 2018 and the initial days of the 201S Regular Session, when corrective action may be enacted, licensees will remain subject to all potency and contaminants testing requirements. Additionally, the State pesticide and random testing programs will Sincerely, ohn NV. Hickenlooper Colorado House of Representatives June 7, 2017 Page 2 of 2 remain in operation. Hov,:c\.er, MED will b unable to initiate enfortxinnt ri:tions trig.lered by failed testing unless the law is changed. Given the processes for testing and enforcement established in MED rules, it is highly unlikely that any enforcement action will be triggered in the first month of 2018. Therefore, a correction enacted by the General Assembly in the early weeks of session is critical. We communicated this issue to the sponsors and proponents of HB 17-1367. As a result of these conversations, the sponsors and proponents, in coordination with State agencies, will present draft legislation to the General Assembly. for consideration in the initial days of the 2018 Regular Session. This will correct the language error and restore the affected components of the State's testing program. We urge the General Assembly to address this matter as soon as possible, so the State's testing program, which exists to protect marijuana consumers and employees of licensed marijuana businesses, will not be compromised. We stand ready to work with the General Assembly in this effort. For these reasons, and with the understanding that all parties will work cooperatively and expeditiously in the 2018 Regular Session, I allowed HB 17-1367 to become law without my signature. Governor ITEM NO: DATE: February 12, 2018 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE A CONTRACT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $825,000 TO CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ONGOING BUILDING PERMIT, PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING ALL SUBSEQUENT PAYMENTS PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Director of Community Development City Manager ISSUE: The City has historically contracted with an outside professional services firm to provide a portion of the City’s building division customer service functions related primarily to building inspections. When the building division has been fully staffed, this outside contract firm has provided coverage for staff absences for vacations and trainings. Additionally, the outside firm provides technical expertise in areas such as commercial electrical inspections, which the City has not always been able to provide with in-house staff. Complex building permit plan reviews have also frequently been outsourced to our outside contract firm. For several reasons explained further below, the City has negotiated a contract with Charles Abbott and Associates (CAA) to provide full service building division services. In other words, the City is proposing to fully outsource our building division staffing to allow CAA to function effectively as an extension of City Staff. PRIOR ACTION: The contract for building division professional services periodically is placed out for public bidding and most recently, in early 2017, the City selected CAA to provide those services. CAA has been functioning in this role since April 2017, starting with the City just weeks before the May 8 hailstorm. Because of the abrupt timing of the departure of the City’s previous contract Council Action Form – Contract Building Division Services February 12, 2018 Page 2 firm and the significantly higher volume of permits and inspections associated with the May 8 storm, it was not possible to finalize a long-term contract with CAA when bringing them on board in mid-April and they have been providing services to the City under an interim Letter of Agreement. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The fee structure in the contract (attached) is such that CAA receives the majority of the building permit fees paid to the City, exclusive of use tax. Those fees include building permit fees, plan review fees and contractor licensing fees. The proposal is that CAA would receive 68% of those fees, meaning that the City still receives 32% of the fees, which will cover staff administrative costs for other Community Development staff who are involved in a smaller way in processing building permits and conducting inspections. The contract is also structured in a manner whereby when building permit revenues exceed certain thresholds in any given month, the percentage portion of what is shared back with CAA will be reduced slightly (from 68% to 60% when revenues exceed $60,001/month and from 60% to 55% when monthly revenues exceed $100,000). This is in recognition of some efficiencies they are able to achieve as work volume increases. CAA will also play a role in reviewing and approving all business licenses, which are processed through the City’s Administrative Services Department. CAA will assign all business license applications to an inspector for review and then schedule a field inspection. If corrective work is required to comply with applicable building codes, a re-inspection will also be required on a portion of these license applications before final approval. CAA proposes to assign a flat fee of $95 per application for those services. Based on an average number of licenses processed by the building division over the past 4 years (240/year), CAA would be due $22,800 for that work. CAA will also provide 24-hour coverage for after-hours emergency inspections that are needed for situations where the integrity of a building is affected by instances such as fires or vehicle crashes that cause structural damage. No additional fee will be assessed for those responses. It is of course important to understand what the anticipated impact will be to the City’s General Fund budget, which is where all building permit revenues are allocated and from where all current building division expenses are paid. To that end, staff has looked back at past years to analyze and compare the CAA proposed pricing structure relative to the actual building division budget. The following table illustrates how the proposed contract would have impacted the City’s General Fund budget in 2014-2016. 2014 2015 2016 Revenue Baseline $1,010,285 $1,006,882 $857,151 68% Revenue Share with CAA $686,994 $684,680 $582,863 32% City Revenue $323,291 $322,202 $274,288 Council Action Form – Contract Building Division Services February 12, 2018 Page 3 Business License Costs $22,800 $22,800 $22,800 Expenses $495,330 $591,081 $627,062 Impact on General Fund Negative $214,464 Negative $116,400 Positive $21,400 These raw revenue and expense figures do not factor in City expenses related to city issued vehicles, mobile phones, Surface Pros, etc., all of which would be fully covered by CAA per the terms of the proposed contract. These figures also do not factor in staff time and expense associated with recruiting and training new building division staff. Finally, these figures do not account for the reduced percentage share back that would occur in months where certain building division revenue thresholds are exceeded, as explained on page 2 of this council action form. On balance, staff feels this outsourced model will generally be revenue neutral and any potential additional expenses are outweighed by what we believe will be an improved customer service delivery model. The 2018 Budget includes a total of $868,433 for the Building Division. Of that, $402,000 was estimated for contractual inspection services. In “Personnel Services,” which includes staff salaries, wages and benefits, a total of $433,742 was approved. A portion of that $433,742 will be needed to cover staff expenses through the end of February – approximately $36,000. Of the total budget of $868,433, staff estimates $825,000 will be able to be moved into the Contractual Services line item to cover estimated CAA costs. BACKGROUND: As noted, the City has always had a need to maintain a contract based professional services firm to provide a portion of the City’s customer service functions of the building division within the Community Development Department. The building division provides four (4) core functions: contractor licensing, building permitting and associated plan review, building inspections and hotel/motel inspections. The building division also provides support to other departments/divisions in regards to business licensing and code enforcement. Historically, the amount of work outsourced to our contract firm has ebbed and flowed based on our work volume and level of internal staffing. When internal staff positions have been vacant or specialty technical skill sets have been absent in our internal staffing, we have relied more heavily on our contract inspection firm to provide building division services. As City Council may be aware, it has been challenging to keep our building division fully staffed over the last several years. The pool of qualified candidates for building inspector positions is limited and the profession has not been adequately replacing itself with the number of new professionals entering the field. Similarly, the pool of qualified Chief Building Official candidates is extremely limited and as a result, it has been challenging to recruit and retain individuals in that position. As a result, the CBO position has been vacant for extended periods over the past 3+ years. Lacking a permanent CBO also makes recruitment and retention of other building division staff (Permit Technicians and Inspectors/Plans Reviewers) more difficult. Council Action Form – Contract Building Division Services February 12, 2018 Page 4 The model of fully out-sourcing building division services is certainly not without precedent in the Denver Metro and Front Range area. Centennial has long fully out-sourced those functions and Denver also outsources a portion of these functions. Small communities like the Towns of Bennett and Lyons fully outsource and most of the mid to large Denver metro communities out-source a portion of these functions to be able to respond more quickly to ebbs and flows in permit and inspection work volumes. For these and other reasons, the City is proposing a long-term contract with CAA to provide 100% of our building division staffing as a seamless extension of the Community Development Department staff. It should be noted that CAA provides full service building division services to the majority of their clients, many of whom are based in California. In checking references as part of the process of selecting CAA in early 2017, we received very positive feedback about CAA from several of those clients that they fully service. Many of their clients have used CAA for over 20 years. Staff believes the outsourced building division staffing model has the strong potential of improving customer service, for the following reasons: • CAA has a strong customer service ethos and provides regular training for their employees in that regard • CAA has a depth of well-trained staff resources who are able to deliver high quality professional services from the first day they are assigned to the City; no training is required as would otherwise be the case when the City hires new team members • CAA has an ability to rapidly adjust the amount of staffing as work volume ebbs and flows, ensuring the City always has adequate inspectors and permit techs to meet changing demands As a practical matter, because of the significant staffing needs resulting from the May 8 hailstorm, CAA has been functioning almost like a full service building division contract firm over the course of much of 2017. On a daily basis, CAA has provided as many as 6 inspectors and 3 or 4 permit technicians to augment City staff at the peak volume of work flow associated primarily with residential re-roof permits resulting from the May 8 hailstorm. CAA has also conducted a large percentage of building permit plan reviews. The City was fortunate that CAA had sufficient staff resources to meet the City’s needs and has been providing staff from as far away as Georgia, Nevada and California. CAA has been absorbing costs associated with car rentals, hotels, per diems, etc. with these employees who are based in these out of state locations. RECOMMENDATIONS: While this is a significant change in business model for the City, staff is confident it can result in improved and consistent customer service delivery. Staff is committed to ensuring that the CAA employees working through this contract will be perceived in the community as extensions of City staff and ultimately are accountable to the Community Development Director and City Manager in the same manner as City employees would be. To that end, they will have City ID badges and business cards, wear City logo clothing, place City logos on sides of vehicles, etc. Council Action Form – Contract Building Division Services February 12, 2018 Page 5 RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve a contract in an amount not to exceed $825,000 to Charles Abbott Associates, Inc., Broomfield, CO, for ongoing building permit, plan review and inspection services and authorizing all subsequent payments.” Or, “I move to deny approval of a contract in an amount not to exceed $825,000 to Charles Abbott Associates, Inc., Broomfield, CO, for ongoing building permit, plan review and inspection services for the following reason(s) .” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Ken Johnstone, Director of Community Development Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Professional Services Contract with Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 1 CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR FULL SERVICE BUILDING DIVISION SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made this ________ day of ______________ 2018, by and between the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as the “City” or “Owner” and CHARLES ABBOTT ASSOCIATES, INC., hereinafter referred to as “Consultant”, with corporate offices located at 27401 Los Altos, Suite 220, Mission Viejo, CA 92691 and local offices located at 390 Interlocken Crescent, 3rd Floor, Broomfield, CO 80021. WITNESSETH, that the City of Wheat Ridge and the Consultant in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 – SERVICES The City proposes to utilize the services of Consultant for Full Service Building Division Services. The Consultant has represented to the City that the Consultant has the requisite qualifications and experience, and has the requisite facilities to properly perform the proposed services in a thorough, competent, professional, and workmanlike manner. A. Consultant will perform services and the related work described above, as per the Statement of Work, attached as Exhibit A. B. Consultant will perform services based on directives issued by the City. Consultant will not undertake any work, which will result in costs, expenses, or fees without written permission from the City. Consultant will not further subcontract or assign said work to any other individual or company without consent of the City. C. The City may require Consultant to provide additional services beyond the items described above. For such services, the rates and quantities will be negotiated between the City and Consultant. If approved by the City, a written work order will be provided. D. Consultant will perform the services under this Agreement in a skillful and competent manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of the work in which Consultant is engaged. Services provided pursuant to this Agreement will be provided in a substantial, first class, and workmanlike manner to conform to the standards of quality normally provided in the field. ARTICLE 2 – TERM This Agreement will take effect upon signing by both parties and issuance of a Notice to Proceed by the City. The initial term of the contract will be 3 years from the effective date, with the option of the Parties to mutually agree to an additional 2-year extension. Notwithstanding any other provision in the Contract to the contrary, the Parties understand and acknowledge that the City is subject to Article X, § 20 of the Colorado Constitution ("TABOR"). The Contract does not create a multi-fiscal year direct or indirect debt or obligation within the meaning of TABOR and, therefore, notwithstanding anything in the Contract to the contrary, all payment obligations of the City are expressly dependent and conditioned upon the continuing appropriation of funds beyond the term of the City’s current fiscal period ending upon the next succeeding December 31. Financial obligations of the City payable after the current fiscal year are contingent upon funds for that purpose being appropriated, budgeted, and otherwise made available in accordance with ordinances and resolutions of the City and other applicable law. ATTACHMENT 1 Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 2 ARTICLE 3 – PAYMENT AND FEE SCHEDULE It is understood and agreed, by and between the parties hereto, that the City shall pay the Consultant for services provided based on a percentage of fees collected on a monthly basis. The Consultant shall accept a a Not to Exceed amount of Eight Hundred Twenty-five Thousand dollars, $825,000 as full payment for such services, except as otherwise approved by City Council, if the earned amount exceeds this annual amount. Consultant will provide monthly invoices, which will itemize all work performed and related charges for that work. The City will pay each such invoice within 30 days of receipt of each invoice. Consultant will provide an unconditional release for any and all amounts due upon receiving payment from the City. The City will contact Consultant not later than 5 days of receipt of any invoice which is in dispute. CAA proposes to provide all Building and Safety Services outlined in the Scope of Work for the following percentage of fees collected, except Business License processing and inspection fees will be $95 per license application. Fees below are inclusive of all costs, including general and administrative, travel, per diem, training, materials, supplies, and other items necessary to complete the project. Fees listed include: • As-Needed Company Liaison • As-Needed Operational Support • Certified Building Official • Certified Building Inspectors • Certified Plan Reviewer • Permit Technicians Additional qualified personnel are available as needed. Monthly Fees Collected* CAA’s % of Fees First $60,000/month 68% Amounts from $60,001/month - $100,000/month 60% Over $100,001/month 55% * cumulative CAA will respond to all emergency inspections after hours at no cost to the city. A. Invoices by Task Invoices will be submitted by the Consultant monthly for services performed and expenses incurred pursuant to this Agreement during the prior month. The processing of payment will be expedited by the Treasurer's Office through proper accounting procedures. Payment will be made to the Consultant within thirty (30) days of the receipt of the approved invoices for services rendered. B. Funding There is in effect within the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, a provision of the City's Code of Laws which limits the amount for which the City shall be liable to the amount expressly appropriated by the City Council, either through budgeted appropriation, or contract or bid award. The Consultant is specifically advised of the provisions of this portion of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which was enacted pursuant to Ordinance 787, Series of 1989, and expressly incorporated herein. This contract is specifically subject to the provisions of said Ordinance and adopted Code Section. Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 3 ARTICLE 4 – INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT In performing the work under this Agreement, the Consultant acts as an independent Consultant and is solely responsible for necessary and adequate worker’s compensation insurance, person injury and property damage insurance, as well as errors and omissions insurance. The Consultant, as an independent Consultant, is obligated to pay federal and state income tax on monies earned. The personnel employed by the Consultant are not and shall not become employees, agents or servants of the City because of the performance of any work by this agreement. The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for it, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other than bona fide employees working solely for the Consultant, any commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach or violation of this warranty, the City will have the right to annul this Agreement without liability or in its discretion to deduct from the Agreement price or consideration, or otherwise recover the full amount of such fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or contingent fee. ARTICLE 5 – INSURANCE A. In accordance with Article 4 above, the Consultant shall furnish a certificate of insurance upon notification of award and prior to performance. Consultant will neither work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required hereunder from a company or companies rated A or better, nor will Consultant allow any additional Sub-Consultant to commence work for any part of this agreement until all insurance required of this Agreement (as outlined below) has been obtained. B. Throughout the term of this Agreement, at Consultant’s sole cost and expense, Consultant will keep, or cause to be kept, in full force and effect, for the mutual benefit of the City and Consultant the following insurance policies: • General Liability Insurance – Providing protection of $1,000,000 per occurrence / $2,000,000 annual aggregate against claims and liabilities for personal injury, death, or property damage arising from Consultant’s activities. • Professional Liability Insurance – Providing protection for at least $2,000,000 per occurrence/annual aggregate against claims and liabilities of the Consultant. • Automobile Liability Insurance – Providing protection for at least $1,000,000 combined single limit. • Worker’s Compensation Insurance – In accordance with the provisions of the laws of the State of Colorado. All insurance required by this Agreement will be carried only with responsible insurance companies licensed to do business in the State of Colorado. General and Auto Liability policies will name the City, its officers, agents and employees as additional insured. Nothing herein shall be deemed or construed as a waiver of any of the protections to, which the Agencies may be entitled pursuant to the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, sections 24-10-101, C.R.S., as amended. ARTICLE 6 – INDEMNIFICATION To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against any damage, liability or cost (including reasonable attorney fees and cost of defense) to the extent caused by the Contractor’s negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the services under the Contract and those of any sub-contractors, sub-consultants or anyone for whom the Contractor is legally liable. It is the intention of the Parties that each shall be responsible for their own negligent acts. These defense and indemnification obligations shall survive the expiration or termination of the Contract. The Parties acknowledge that the provisions of this Paragraph are not intended to waive or alter any of the immunities, limitations, and defenses afforded to the City under the common law, the Colorado Governmental Immunity Act, C.R.S. §§ 24-10-101, et seq. or any other law. Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 4 ARTICLE 7 – CHANGE ORDERS OR EXTENSIONS The City may, from time to time, require changes in the scope of services of the Consultant to be performed herein. Such changes, including any increase or decrease in the amount of the Consultant’s compensation, must be mutually agreed upon in writing by the City and the Consultant. The Consultant shall be compensated for all authorized changes in services, pursuant to the Request for Proposal, or if no provision exists, pursuant to the terms of the Change Order. ARTICLE 8 – EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Consultant shall adhere to acceptable affirmative action guidelines in selecting employees and shall ensure that employees are treated equally during employment, without regard to their age, race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Such action shall include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship., The Consultant agrees to post in conspicuous places, available to employees and applicants for employment, notices provided by the local public agency setting forth the provisions of this nondiscrimination clause. The Consultant will cause the foregoing provisions to be inserted in all subcontracts for any work covered by this Agreement so that such provisions will be binding upon each sub-consultant, provided that the foregoing provisions shall not apply to contracts or subcontracts for standard commercial supplies or raw materials. ARTICLE 9 – CHARTER, LAWS AND ORDINANCES The Consultant at all times during the performance of this Agreement, agrees to strictly adhere to all applicable Federal, State and Local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances that affect or govern the work as contemplated under this Agreement. ARTICLE 10 – LAW AND VENUE The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern as to the interpretation, validity, and effect of this Agreement. The parties agree that venue and jurisdiction for disputes regarding performance of this contract is with the District Court of Jefferson County, Colorado. ARTICLE 11 – TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by the City for any reason or for no reason by notifying the Consultant in writing of the same not less than thirty (30) days prior to the intended date of termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Contract, upon the City’s failure to appropriate funds for payment of the compensation required by the Contract, the Contract shall automatically terminate as of the date prior appropriated funds are exhausted. Consultant may terminate this agreement by providing the City with written notice, at least 60 days in advance of such termination. Termination shall not affect rights, duties and liability which accrue prior to termination. In the event of any termination, the City shall be liable to Consultant for payments representing compensation for services up to the point of termination, based on the work competed to such date. The Parties each agree to bear their own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in connection with any termination, including any judicial proceedings resulting therefrom. Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 5 ARTICLE 12 – NOTICES City Contact: Contractor Contact: Ken Johnstone Community Services Director Charles Abbott Associates 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 kjohnstone@ci.wheatridge.co.us Phone: 303-235-2844 Phone: ARTICLE 13 – ASSIGNMENT AND SUB-CONSULTANTS The duties and obligations of the Consultant arising hereunder cannot be assigned, delegated, nor subcontracted except with the express written consent of the City. The sub-consultants permitted by the City shall be subject to the requirements of this Agreement, and the Consultant is responsible for all subcontracting arrangements and the delivery of services as set forth in this Agreement. The Consultant shall be responsible for the performance of any sub-consultant. ARTICLE 14 – SEVERABILITY To the extent that the Agreement may be executed and performance of the obligations of the parties may be accomplished within the intent of the Agreement, the terms of this Agreement are severable, and should any term or provision hereof be declared invalid or become inoperative for any reason, such invalidity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other term or provision hereof. The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, or the same term upon subsequent breach. ARTICLE 15 – INTEGRATION OF UNDERSTANDINGS This Agreement supersedes any and all agreements, either oral or written, between the parties hereto, and contains all of the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to rendering of services described herein. This Agreement is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force and effect whatsoever, unless embodied herein in writing. No subsequent novation, renewal, addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or effect unless embodied in writing and signed by an authorized representative of the City and the Consultant. ARTICLE 16 – PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYING OR CONTRACTING WITH ILLEGAL ALIENS A. The Consultant hereby certifies that at the time of executing this Agreement it does not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien who will perform work under this Agreement and that it will participate in either the E-Verify Program or Department Program as those terms are defined in C.R.S. §§ 8-17.5-101(3.7) and (3.3), respectively, (the “Programs”) in order to confirm the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for employment to perform work under this Agreement. B. The Consultant shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perform the work under this Agreement or enter into a contract with a sub-consultant that fails to certify to the Consultant that the sub-consultant shall not knowingly employ or contract with an illegal alien to perform work under this Agreement. C. The Consultant has confirmed the employment eligibility of all employees who are newly hired for employment to perform work under the Agreement through participation in either the E-Verify Program or the Department Program. D. The Consultant is prohibited from using the Programs procedures to undertake pre-employment screening of job applicants while this Agreement is being performed. Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 6 E. If the Consultant obtains actual knowledge that a sub-consultant performing the work under this Agreement knowingly employs or contracts with an illegal alien, the Consultant shall be required to: (a) notify the sub-consultant and the City within three (3) days that the Consultant has actual knowledge that the sub-consultant is knowingly employing or contracting with an illegal alien; and (b) terminate the subcontract with the sub-consultant if within three (3) days of receiving the notice, required pursuant to C.R.S. § 8-17.5-102(2)(III)(A), the sub-consultant does not stop employing or contracting with the illegal alien; except that the Consultant shall not terminate the contract with the sub-consultant if during such three (3) days the sub-consultant provides information to establish that the sub-consultant has not knowingly employed or contracted with an illegal alien. F. The Consultant shall comply with any reasonable request by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (the “Department”) made in the course of an investigation that the Department is undertaking pursuant to the authority established in C.R.S. § 8-17.5-102(5). ARTICLE 17 – OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS Consultant agrees that all original documents, plans, reports, and other materials developed during the course of providing the services specified in the Agreement will be the property of the City and will be provided by the Consultant to the City upon their completion. ARTICLE 18 – CONSULTANT’S RECORDS Consultant will keep records and invoices in connection with its work to be performed under this Agreement. Consultant will maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement. All such records will be clearly identifiable. Consultant will allow a representative of the City during normal business hours to examine, audit, and make transcripts or copies of such records. Consultant will allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to the Agreement for a period of five years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. ARTICLE 19 – NON-SOLICITATION During and for a period of six (6) months following termination of this Agreement, the City shall not directly or indirectly solicit for hire or engage any personnel (whether as employee, consultant or in any other capacity) of CAA with responsibilities related to this Agreement without CAA’s prior written consent. Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 7 ARTICLE 20 – AUTHORIZATION Each party represents and warrants that it has the power and ability to enter into this Agreement, to grant the rights granted herein and to perform the duties and obligations described herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement in two (2) copies, each of which shall be deemed an original on the day and year first written above. ATTEST: ______________________________ JANELLE SHAVER, CITY CLERK ______________________________ DATE (Seal) APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________ GERALD DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST TO CONTRACTOR: ________________________________ NAME ________________________________ TITLE ________________________________ DATE OWNER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 7500 W 29TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 303-234-5900 ______________________________ BUD STARKER, MAYOR CONSULTANT Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. 27401 Los Altos, Suite 220 Mission Viejo, CA 92691 PHONE _____________________________ AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Rusty R. Reed PRINT NAME CEO/President TITLE __________________________________ DATE Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 8 EXHIBIT A - STATEMENT OF WORK Charles Abbott Associates, Inc. (CAA) will provide Full Service Building Division Services to the City of Wheat Ridge (City), including plan review and building inspection services as well as Building Official services. CAA offers to provide the requested services to the City as dictated by workload, including building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and residential code inspections and plan check, support staffing at the public counter during regular business hours, complex code interpretation, policy and procedure recommendations, complaint investigations, and all other related activities. CAA will provide guaranteed turnaround times and on-call emergency staff as needed. CAA is committed to fulfilling these services in a comprehensive and thorough manner with staff that is service oriented, courteous, and reliable. CAA will provide ICC certified staff to serve as the City’s Building Official, Permit Technician(s) as well as ICC Certified Building Inspector(s), Plans Examiner(s), and Registered Professionals as dictated by workload. CAA’s Building Inspector(s) will be available to conduct all inspection requests no later than the next business day. CAA staff will process and route construction drawings for plan check, calculate permit fees, issue and close out permits, conduct minor plan checks over the counter, and perform related tasks as needed. CAA will provide building code related code enforcement and be available to consult with office staff on building department or permit issues and questions as they arise. Administration CAA will serve as the City’s Building Official and be responsible for the administration and enforcement of the City’s various codes and ordinances related to building safety while ensuring that the health and safety of the public are maintained through adherence to the requirements established by law for the construction, alteration or use of new and existing buildings. Through cooperation with other departments, CAA is able to assist in protecting the economic interests of the community with the ultimate goal of ensuring the development of safe and sustainable buildings for subsequent generations. Complete Administration of the Building Safety Division includes the following Certified Building Official Responsibilities: • Quality control review of plan checks and inspections • Building codes updates and adoption • Enforce building codes and ADA Standards for Accessible Design • Enforce adopted codes with regard to unsafe structures, existing building, rental property maintenance and energy code compliance • Lend expertise in the plan review and inspection of historic structures • Ensure compliance with zoning conditions, certificate of appropriateness, and conditions of approval • Resolution of residents inquiries and complaints • Building Official Administration, processing of complex Building Code Issues and dispute resolution • Building and Safety Procedures Manual development and maintenance Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 9 • Ensure preparation of detailed monthly, quarterly, and annual reports of their activities to the City on accountability report forms approved by the City. The reports will include, but are not limited to, staffing levels provided, staff hours expended, the number of plans reviewed, number of inspections performed, and other statistical information pertinent to the services provided • Participate in pre-development review and provide comments • Attendance of Building Code Advisory Board, Planning Commission and Council meetings (as-needed) • Ensure the maintenance of all necessary equipment to perform the contracted services • Ensure proper staffing levels, supervision and training of all subordinate team members in order to maintain the minimum production standards • Ensure records maintenance of approved plans and permits as required by law • Develop training and educational materials relevant to building safety for dissemination to the elected and appointed officials, contractors and general public • Attend court hearings regarding building code violations when requested • Attend meetings of other local building officials to discuss proposed code changes, enforcement issues, new code compliant technology and alternatives • Review for approval all alternative materials, designs or methods of construction for compliance with the intent and provisions of the code • Consultation with City staff in other departments/divisions on applicability of building codes and regulations on City projects, such as something like a minor Rec Center remodel. • Assist in website maintenance and development for Building Division content • Assist the City in acquiring and implementing new building permitting software • Building Division Policy and procedure drafting and implementation • Establish and communicate communications and reporting protocols • Establish and communicate to the City how CAA will communicate and report out to the City/Community Development Director (CDD) • Establish billing protocols • Additional services as needed and as requested Building Inspection CAA will provide the inspection of structures under construction in the City for compliance with all local ordinances, state and federal laws that pertain to Building and Safety and for compliance with the adopted Building Code, Residential Code, Plumbing Code, Electrical Code, Mechanical Code, Property Maintenance Code, City adopted or proposed Sustainability Standards, and Accessibility Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 10 and Energy Codes in addition to any Building Division Policy Statements as issued by the Chief Building Official. CAA will provide inspectors as required by workload. A CAA Building Inspector will be available at all times to conduct urgent building inspections, should they arise. • Inspection Personnel Qualifications CAA assigned staff will perform inspection services as required by the City. Our staff will meet or exceed the City’s minimum qualifications for all position(s). Competent inspectors will be provided whose background, experience, applicable certifications and demeanor demonstrates the ability to conduct inspections in accordance with jurisdiction standards. All CAA inspectors are ICC certified. • Inspection Responsibilities Inspectors assigned to the City will perform periodic construction inspections to verify that the work of construction is in conformance with the approved project plans, as well as identifying issues of non-compliance with applicable codes. Projects under construction by permit from the City will be inspected for compliance with the City adopted Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, Electrical, Energy, Property Maintenance, and Accessibility Codes, as well as a working familiarity with the Fire Codes. Inspectors are accessible and available to meet with the project design team and/or the client’s representatives to work out problems and help resolve issues quickly and efficiently. Our inspection staff easily integrates into client organizations. • Guaranteed Response Times In an effort to provide quality assurance, CAA proposes to use our "best service guarantee" program. This program assures the City that all turn around times are met or improved, all inspections are conducted when requested, and emergency response is timely and effective. • CAA will conduct any necessary or required building investigations as directed by the City. Investigations will include field and office research, investigation follow-ups and preparation of notices, letters, or documents. • CAA will provide and maintain all vehicles and equipment required or necessary to carry out inspections and duties of the Building Services Division. • CAA will conduct all inspections the following day for all requests received the day before up to 12 A.M. Plan Review CAA will provide the plan review of any and all types of structures including, but not limited to, single family dwellings, multi-family dwellings, industrial and commercial buildings for compliance with all local ordinances and State and Federal laws that pertain to Building and Safety, and for compliance with the adopted Building Code, Residential Code, Plumbing Code, Electrical Code, and Mechanical Code, Building Standards Code, Accessibility and Energy Standards, and the Municipal Code. Plan review will be performed in-house in most cases and off-site when the need arise due to workload variations and in order to meet our committed timelines. All initial reviews will be returned within 10 business days for single family residential, small and large commercial projects, and improvement plans. Rechecks will be returned within 5 working days. These are maximum times, and we typically are able to turn around simple plan reviews in less than half the time. CAA will provide Rapid Plan Review services at the public counter on Thursday and Friday mornings Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 11 By cooperating and working closely with all of the entities responsible for project approval, CAA forms a collaborative working relationship that centers on successful project processing. As a result, the development approval process with other departments is timely, seamless and efficient. Team members minimize surprises that can lead to costly delays due to plan revisions late in the approval process by beginning work early with the project design team involved in major construction projects. CAA plan reviewers are always willing to meet with clients for pre-design meetings, pre-submittal meetings or as needed to resolve complex code related plan review issues in the most efficient manner possible; this is just part of the facilitative approach to plan review which emphasizes building safety while allowing for innovation to resolve complicated building design issues. Our approach to plan review ensures that plans submitted to CAA for review are properly tracked and processed. Our system ensures that each plan or permit is assigned, returned, and handled on time and within budget. The status of any plan can easily be determined at any point in time. Our registered professionals and certified plan examiners review all plans and calculations, thus assuring that the technical components and all code items are thoroughly reviewed. Most of our plans examiners are cross-trained and also certified as inspectors, providing a very efficient use of personnel and expediting the process for the applicant. We provide timely turnaround of plan reviews and re-reviews based on guaranteed turn-around times. Our staff also handles any coordination required as part of the review. Building Counter Operations CAA can provide permit technician assistance at the public counter to receive and review applications, issue permits, license building contractors, respond to in-person queries, be available for scheduled meetings, and provide assistance over the phone and via email to both City staff and the public as required. CAA will also provide staffing to the City’s Thursday and Friday morning Rapid Review process. CAA will provide the processing and issuance of Building permits including building, plumbing, electrical and mechanical permits, plan check submittals, data entry, scanning, reporting, and other related permit technician duties as assigned. Optionally, CAA will provide a Permit Technician with computer skills and knowledge of plan check issues to the City to coordinate the plan check and inspection process, including the tracking, routing, and storage of building plans and filing of building permit applications. Our staff will provide information regarding building permit applications, plan check, inspection services and related matters to the public in a courteous and expeditious manner. CAA will calculate and collect all necessary fees and permits for plan submission, permits, and inspections, including contractor license fees and will also facilitate the collection of fees from other departments and/or agencies related to the issuance of a building permit. Staffing CAA will offer employment to the current City Building Division staff contingent on contract award and cover any costs associated with ensuring continuous health insurance coverage during the transition from City employment to CAA employment. Full Service Building Division Services Consultant Agreement Page 12 Operational Cost CAA will provide all materials, resources, tools and training required for our professionals to perform their assigned duties, including vehicles, cell phones, iPads, and other technology devices that enhance our service. CAA expects CAA employees to receive City badges, business cards, Outlook e-mail access, ADG access, and other IT network access as needed and appropriate, so that they can seamlessly function as an extension of City Staff. Fee Schedule CAA proposes to provide all Building and Safety Services outlined in the Scope of Work for the following percentage of fees collected, except Business License processing and inspection fees will be $95 per license application. Fees below are inclusive of all costs, including general and administrative, travel, per diem, training, materials, supplies, and other items necessary to complete the project. Fees listed include: • As-Needed Company Liaison • As-Needed Operational Support • Certified Building Official • Certified Building Inspectors • Certified Plan Reviewer • Permit Technicians Additional qualified personnel are available as needed. Monthly Fees Collected* CAA’s % of Fees First $60,000/month 68% Amounts from $60,001/month - $100,000/month 60% Over $100,001/month 55% * cumulative CAA will respond to all emergency inspections after hours at no cost to the city.