Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout3557 Urban CourtCity of / W heat lidge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building F: 303.237.8929 November 22, 2019 Owner/Occupant 3557 Urban Court Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 7500 W. 291h Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2855 RE: Previously permitted project plans available for retrieval — Permit 201801378 (Single Family Dwelling) Owner/Occupant, This letter is being sent to you because a project for which a permit was issued by the City of Wheat Ridge Building Division and plans and/or other documents were required was recently completed and approved. In accordance with the Building Division's document retention policy, the associated plans and/or other documents are scheduled for disposal. We are writing to offer you an opportunity to retrieve those approved plans and/or documents prior to their disposal by the Building Division. The plans and/or documents are available for retrieval for a period of 20 working days (4 weeks) from the date of this letter — December 26th — and must be retrieved in person at the Building Division offices. This letter must be presented at the time of retrieval of the plans and/or documents. Plans and/or documents available for retrieval CANNOT be mailed and plans and/or documents will NOT be available for retrieval after the expiration of the retrieval period. You may retrieve plans and/or documents between the hours of 7:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, at the Building Division offices located at 7500 W. 291h Avenue in Wheat Ridge. Cordially, Kimberly Cook Permit Technician 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2873 Fax: 303-237-8929 www.ci.wheatrid eg co.us City of W heat id ,e COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT www.ci.wheatridge.co.us -�•-,ten..—. .,.-.z--•-. -_-�- _. •- _ _ _. O N kn 00 t` M 00 0 a y yJ O A 3 U 01 � U A o a� m o d 4 H 4-4 U b O H N W A a3 4-4 N U O A iJ g y, q cl .,l U ro ro 0 ro r4 N N 0 A U yi -i4J O q a ro x U z° ro U —1 44 W O tri b w N .H U 44 O ro Q 0O U C `ya U 4J P U O ro w U 44 W 'A U .rl 14 4J 43 U m O U a p O 41 ro 4J W G .,i rn G G O N o o ay ) kn �°02 N .p o m z � 7 q o U Q d r M i N o0 0 a � v �V a > by d w v Id o rr\\ w > to O w H ,b U V o d � H a w 0 ou 00 0 w v b� kn In El 00 Oca '" U N U q O N CJS O U r.41W WE �� w o�z r 0U N N o O 04 d II Q ai U Z d 'd U r`1 rd q4.) ,4 CU ro U y� W c� v a� w L o O vi l A U �4J .-I o C ens.. >.rCID lel o 'CU -U6 ro o cp cd �Zp G CL 4 oW V Fy ecce M CL, L ' tt z 0 Ei 0 cc 3 wA 3 a o z d a QQAc,O 4) 0 0 00 > L xaAN"a z rtw� o °•' d^o UOQ�aO � ° ro N V W o N44A r o q y a fyr �l u is N N 6 n z O a a N o 0 vj y 3oado roU F a�' OUars.r� 0 ry p' i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPE6TIPIS1 NOTICE Inspection Type: ,r«, G '� -�� 7, Job Address: Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspections -Time 05_ PM Re -Inspection required: Yes o When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: , Inspector: -'- DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION_ NOTICE Inspection Type: _ Job Address:-- C.D�a0� Permit Number: C: '[ ❑ No one available for inspection: Time t` I I e_-_AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Ye' When corrections have been made,(cbfor re -inspection at 303-234-5933 DaterInspecton� �� DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE _ i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type:L/C5-2i F:T Job Address: C1 Permit Number:`w] ❑ No one available for inspection: Ti Re -Inspection required Ye� No When corrections have been made. RtW for f Dated In at M A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax IN PECTION NONCE Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number:�,5'j�� ❑ No one available for inspection: Time -. aAIV,%PM Re -Inspection required: Yes FNo �P When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: k to '/� Inspector: --- DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE 2 i CITY OF WHEAT. Buitdiri!`'Inspection-'6Iv Bion (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 1 �'r` `' e C-'Y� Job Address: Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspectionjiniq Re -Inspection required: Yes 4o When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: '�-_} '; \r, Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i Flrq<,- CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Divisionell (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Y m r D Inspection Type: - ' c... Job Address:, Permit Number:'-' ❑ No one av la1059ion: Time M Re -Inspection required: No When corrections have been made, ca31for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 I�Ins ecDate.� t��_-.. DO NOT REM' VE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE : ;- Building Inspection Division -� (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax . INSPECTION NOTICE qjfQ Inspection Type: i r Job Address:'^? �`L P rJ U ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required Ye No When corrections have been made, call or re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date` Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE : ;- Building Inspection Division -� (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax . INSPECTION NOTICE qjfQ Inspection Type: i r Job Address:'^? �`L P rJ U ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/PM Re -Inspection required Ye No When corrections have been made, call or re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date` Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i Flrq<,- CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Divisionell (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Y m r D Inspection Type: - ' c... Job Address:, Permit Number:'-' ❑ No one av la1059ion: Time M Re -Inspection required: No When corrections have been made, ca31for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 I�Ins ecDate.� t��_-.. DO NOT REM' VE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Bial ling ,inspection�,ivision (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax Inspection Type: Job Address: Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Time �1AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No When corrections have een made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 DateZ_7 Inspector: � DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: - yz_ Job Address: Permit Number: F1 LINo one available for inspection: Time 1 i f t¢ 'MkPM Re -Inspection required: YesNgo When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234 - Date: Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE Designing to Meet IRC Fire- Protection Provisions for IMJWI ist Floor Systems - - • City of '� W heat- �dge COMMUNITY Dtvttc>I'MINI APPROVED Re iewed for Code Compliance r A. Ali 01 f &41 Ary Plans x miner Date Valk v of aennh: The issuance of o permitor approwl of puns specmflcatlaa and canputabons shah not be a pnm,t/or, or an opprovd of, any wolabon to MW of the provisions of the building code or of any My arOnances. Pemft w"UM ep to glue m4horit y to violate or cancel the prowsbns of the 0 COM or other OrOnonon of the City sholl not be valid rAq gning to Meet IRC Protection Provisions I -Joist Floor Systems According to current builder surveys, home builders choose 1 -joist framing for use in about 50 percent of raised floor and first -floor -over -basement construction in U.S. single-family homes. There are many reasons for the consistent popularity of 1 -joist floor assemblies. They help builders realize savings as a result of reduced callbacks. The I joist manufacturing process results in high quality, reliable joists that deliver consistent performance on the job, and that means flatter, quieter floor assemblies. In some states and jurisdictions around the country, building materials dealers and their builder customers are facing tougher restrictions related to floor systems. Both the 2012 and 2015 versions of the International Residential Code (IRC) include fire -protective membrane provisions to enhance the fire performance of floor systems. The IRC requires that all residential floors, with several notable exceptions, need to be covered with drywall or have some other means of increased fire protection. There are numerous fire protection provisions for all types of floor systems in the IRC, but designers and builders have several options on how to meet those provisions. APA System Report SR -405 provides additional options for builders that use i joists. SR -405 is intended to provide prescriptive fire assem- blies for fire protection of floors constructed with prefabricated wood ]-joists when 2012 IRC Section R501.3 and 2015 IRC Section R302.13 provisions are adopted by the local jurisdiction. This APA publication describes the fire protective membrane provisions of the code as they specifically relate to I joist floor systems and presents several options builders can consider. The code -compliant options covered in this brochure include: ■ Gypsum board or wood structural panel ceiling membranes • Gypsum board attached to I joist webs ■ Gypsum board attached to the entire depth of ]-joists • Mineral wool insulation on the top of the bottom flanges ■ Ceramic fiber blanket attached to I- joist webs • Fire protective coatings In APA System Report SR -405, each of these options is thoroughly explained with technical drawings and specifications to ensure code requirements are met. N Fin PmkWm °t Fbm Comsttonod whh " rat Juana CA Designing to Meet IRC Fire Protection Provisions for I -Joist Floor Systems WOOD The Natural Choice Engineered wood products are a good choice for the environment. They are manufactured for years of trouble-free, dependable use. They help reduce waste by decreasing disposal costs and product damage. Wood is a renewable resource that is easily manufactured into a variety of viable products. A few facts about wood. ■ We're growing more wood every day. Forests fully cover one-third of the United States' and one-half of Canada's land mass. American landowners plant more than two billion trees every year. In addition, millions of trees seed naturally. The forest products industry, which comprises about 15 percent of forestland ownership, is responsible for 41 percent of replanted forest acreage. That works out to more than one billion trees a year, or about three million trees planted every day. This high rate of replanting accounts for the fact that each year, 27 percent more timber is grown than is harvested. Canada's replanting record shows a fourfold increase in the number of trees planted between 1975 and 1990. ■ Life Cycle Assessment shows wood is the greenest building product. A 2004 Consortium for Research on Renewable Industrial Materials (CORRIM) study gave scientific validation to the strength of wood as a green building product. In examining building products' life cycles — from extraction of the raw material to demolition of the building at the end of its long lifespan — CORRIM found that wood was better for the environment than steel or concrete in terms of embodied energy, global warming potential, air emissions, water emissions and solid waste production. For the complete details of the report, visit www.CORRIM.org. ■ Manufacturing wood is energy efficient. j Percent of Percent of Wood products made up 47 percent of all Material Production Energy Use industrial raw materials manufactured in the Wood 47 4 United States, yet consumed only 4 percent of the Steel 23 48 energy needed to manufacture all industrial raw Aluminum 2 8 materials, according to a 1987 study. ■ Good news for a healthy planet. For every ton of wood grown, a young forest produces 1.07 tons of oxygen and absorbs 1.47 tons of carbon dioxide. Wood: It's the natural choice for the environment, for design and for strong, NOTICE: A-The recommendations lasting construction. in this guide apply onlY RpSEo� H�TM1NG �2�Ss�a Eoess 451 W. 000 1.09 nttc Ps to products that bear the APA trademark. Only produds bearing the APA trademark are subject to the i Association's qual' r auditing progra 00 city �or Wheat Ridge Form No. R425 ■ © 2015 APA - The Engineered Wood Association 0 www.apawood.org 1 2 Designing to Meet IRC Fire Protection Provisions for 1 -Joist Floor Systems EXCEPTIONS TO THE IRC FIRE PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS Designers and builders should also note that there are some exceptions to 2012 IRC Section R501.3 and 2015 IRC Section R302.13 that make enhanced fire protection unnecessary, such as floors constructed with 2x10 dimension lumber, structural composite lumber, or their equivalent. Also, floor assemblies located directly over a space protected by an automatic sprinkler system do not require a fire protective membrane. Home sprinkler systems are currently not the norm but are gaining traction in some regions. According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), residential fire sprinkler ordinances have been adopted by several hundred U.S. communities for use in single-family homes. While the high cost is a factor for sprinkler systems, NFPA reports that costs have been decreasing in commu- nities where sprinklers are required. Another exception is when only a small area of the floor is unprotected (less than or equal to 80 square feet per story), pro- vided code -required fire blocking is in place to separate the unprotected portion from the remainder of the floor assembly. Enhanced fire protection is not required for floors over crawl spaces, provided the crawl space is not intended for stor- age or contains fuel -fired appliances. If the crawl space is intended for storage or fuel -fired appliances, builders may want to consider installing a durable membrane, such as 5/8 -inch wood structural panels, which are listed in the code. STRATEGIES TO MEET FLOOR ASSEMBLY FIRE -PROTECTION PROVISIONS Here are six methods that can be used in jurisdictions where 2012 IRC Section R501.3 or 2015 IRC Section R302.13 has been adopted. In each of these methods, the I joists must meet the provisions of ASTM D5055 and be installed and ckstructed in accordance with codes, APA Product Reports, code evaluation reports, and manufacturer's instructions. MEN5/8-in 1. 1/2 -Inch Gypsum Instadd a layer of 1/2 -inch g ora wood structural panel, of the flange. Nere drywall to the UN ment insulation is r most climate zones, are becoming more hood of a finished or 5/8 -inch Wood Structural Panel Ceiling Membranes a board bottom are several ben is to installing aside of 1 jo s. Because base - 'r equi/sem y energy codes in fra ed entexterior walls increasing the likeli- While the IRC does not require this gyps boar o be finished, com- bining drywall on asement ihng, along with framing on /thebment wallsovideshome- owners witunities to Basil pgrade to a finished basption. The additio f drywall The IRC does not require the gypsum board applied to the underside of the 1 -joist floor systems to be covered with tape and joint compound. also incres the mass of the floor an cts as a dampe o floor vibrations, increasing horn wner comfort. Noise transmission is also reduced. Th are some significant advantages to finishe asements. Basements can be transformed into home the?en h ice spaces, children's play rooms, libraries, cr rooms, music rooms or in-home workshops, providlders Clt of account for proper conditioning of finished rooms roviding correctly sized heating and cooling equt and Wheat Ridge ilding Form No. R425 • © 2015 APA - The Engineered Wood Association 0 www.apawood.org 1 4 Designing to Meet IRC Fire Protection Provisions foi I -forst Floor Systems FIGURE 4 1/2 -INCH GYPSUM BOARD ATTACHED TO FLANGE WITH WEB HOLE 1" 1" r -8. Max - 1" 4-�t - - Floor sheathing 1/2" Gypsum board - --- - I -joist web - --- 1" _ p. 1" 8" Max ---------- .1 -,---------1 Flanges must be covered above and below web holes in this option. Fasteners shall be installed 1/2 inch from gypsum edges and 16 inches on center. At hole location, fasteners shall be installed on the flanges 1 inch from the end of the gypsum board. Gypsum at the hole location is required to be installed to protect the flanges only, but not the web. As with the round hole option, square or rectangular holes are permitted per the manufacturer's APA Product Report or code evaluation report. METHOD 4. Mineral Wool Batts Installers can add a 3 -inch -thick layer of 2.5 lb/ft' nominal mineral wool fiber insulation to the top of the bottom flange between 1 -joists with a mini- mum flange size of 1-1/8 inches thick x 1-3/4 inches wide (see Figure 5). In this method, the insulation is secured with insulation stay wires spaced no more than 24 inches apart and no more than 4 inches from ends of the batts. Use minimum 15 -1/4 -inch, 18 -1/2 -inch, and 23 -inch -wide batts when I -joist spacing is 16 inches, 19.2 inches, and 24 inches on center, respectively. The thickness of the mineral wool insulation can be reduced to 2 inches if the joist spacing is limited to 16 inches or less. Installing mineral wool between I -joists is one of several methods As an option for unfinished basements, this method builders and installing dealers can use to meet the IRC provisions. has some advantages in that it does not affix any other material directly to the I joists with any kind of fasteners. Installation is simple, requiring minimal tools. While essentially closing up the cavities between the 1 -joists, it is relatively easy to remove the batts to add mechanical system components in the future. Mineral wool batts are readily available from a variety of manufacturers. As with Method 1, this option also helps to minimize noise transfer between the basement and the first floor living space. FIGURE 5 1/2 -INCH GYPSUM BOARD ATTACHED TO MINERAL WOOL - Floor sheathing - I -joist - I I I i - ! Mineral wool insulation Form No. R425 ■ © 2015 APA - The Engineered Wood Association ■ www.apawood.org 1 7 i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE `ffuildirfg� Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • 30 2Y-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE' Inspection Type: -rte Job Address: .� S ❑ No one available for inspection: Time j N,AMr Re -Inspection required: Yes 'No ,F When correctio s hav been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: ,22, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE A i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE �"- Inspection Type: l 9 � ilc I Job Address: C_v Permit: Number: 5� ter. ❑ No one available for inspection: Tim v AM/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes No ,A When corrections have been made, can fors re -inspection at 303-234-5933_, ! eft i Date: °Inspector:'}}� - - %,_ _ DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE { Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: ,"5 Tz 1� PIT e A Retic , _;W-) LM Job Address:`�� > 9 Permit Number: ❑ No one available for inspection: Time Q ` �AWPM Re -Inspection required Yes No When corrections have been made, call,forre-inspection at 303-234-5933 Dater _ f Inspector i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE -1 I§uilding Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECT N NOTICE Inspection Type: Job Address: 14 Permit Number: � `%'1422 3'? -9' ❑ No one available for inspection: Time Re -Inspection required: Yes_��-_ c -- �. When correcti ns hive been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: Inspector: f f DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE 01/30/2019 WED 11:47 FAX 303 420 0207 Redline HTG � , / 4' 71 CIfY Of -�'� Wheat�idge MUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUB -CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZATION FORM 0001/001 This form must be signed by each sub -contractor. This form will not be accepted with missing information. Subcontractor's City of Wheat Ridge License number must be provided in the applicable space. Subcontractor's insurance and license must be up to date prior to permit issuance. Project Address: 35sn Ur bav1 Cf Permit #: a0(S 0 �$ General Contractor: Ko d- 1 Te6 L 1l`1'1''L; e.-� ii Q NJ I Electrical Sub -Contractor Company Name: Phone #: State License #: Master #: (required field) Signature of Authorized Agent Date Plumbing Sub -Contractor Company Name: Phone #: State License #: Master #: Ofte (required field) Signature of Authorized Agent Date I Mechanical Contractor Oncl L-UwJ1F , Company Name: � Phone: ! ao — D53 -a 406 4140 n �� L #required field) ;74411A r I Signature of u or1zed Agent Date Wanda 10'10-3M-9035 i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax SPECTIPN NOTICE Inspection Type: 8 Job Address: 7 S S` (' Permit Number: 0 v ❑ No one available for inspection: Time _js M Re -Inspection required:Yes Nd When corrections have been made, calf for r -inspection a4 303-2-5933 .ti 'Date: Inspec' �.so _ t r: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE V i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 37-8929 Fax INSP 10 ICE Inspection Type: Job Address: _--- Permit Number:/ , J ❑ No one available for inspection: Time -_2 � AM/ &") Re -Inspection required:` Yes) No When corrections have been 'h de, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: Inspector/,__. DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i� I* � 4 i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: F_...'_ Job Address:36-6 h a Ll Permit Number: iw a l go L� ❑ No one available for inspection 71me i % ./Ci AM/PM Re -Inspection required: YesNo When corrections have been made, call for re-inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: / Inspector: M DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE 9 i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 3 Z4 - Ho w se_ L,, rro Job Address:. 5-57 UrLaii O t Permit Number: 2-01001371 r,✓Ka P PP royiod f t :: ❑ No one available for inspection: Time U_APM Re -Inspection required: YesNo, When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: 111Z110 Inspector:ne, Loy -elf DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 306 I ,11-oof / _-?�Qi - Job Address: 35i 7 Ur4o, C-1 Permit Number: 2,01901 _37 0 L1 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time./AIV,I/PM Re -Inspection required: Yes ,NQ' When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303 -234 - Date: 101'3dj!" Inspector: batne. Cove, DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE N i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division _ (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: 34-All'C�-00 Job Address: ?U7 Man 6+1 Permit Number: 20/00�3?� i ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AM/IVF Re -Inspection required: (9 No When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: U 2-ql 10 Inspector: bare Lol.-Ct DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Building Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: ,U - iZ©U _�/1G!�7G /`0;'- Job Address: 511 S) Permit Number: 2-010, 3?� ❑ No one available for inspection: Time AUIPM Re -Inspection required: Yes No V When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: NV7 61f Inspector: DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE 7D i CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE B'ui'lding Inspection Division (303) 234-5933 Inspection line (303) 235-2855 Office • (303) 237-8929 Fax INSPECTION NOTICE Inspection Type: a o -/ - , ! m .. L)n d - = n -k Job Address: 3 .:, S 7 G) r- an C -� Permit Number: -;? d )19 a >'3 i S nn) r -/!rA VnL�- -_T-f)-tr_ /- Pip r -Vu -e w a 11 ❑ No one available for inspection: Time f &PM Re -Inspection required: Yes N When corrections have been made, call for re -inspection at 303-234-5933 Date: l0 3 / S Inspector: _T b DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 400,000.00 FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Plan Review Fee 1,993.58 Use Tax 8,400.00 Permit Fee 3,067.05 Engin. Review Fee 150.00 ** TOTAL ** 13,610.63 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Homeowner performing Mechanical and Plumbing work. All roughs to be done at Framing Inspection. Approved per plans and red -line notes on plans. Must comply with 2012 IRC, 2014 NEC and all applicable City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Codes. Work is subject to field inspections. I, the property owner, by my signature, attest that I currently reside at the project property, intend to reside at the property for a period of one year after completion of the project, and am personally performing all work, without the assistance of hired or professional workers. If professionals are hired, those contractors are licensed with the City of Wheat Ridge and are listed on the permit. Consultations and inspections will only be performed with the homeowner of record present. As part of the foundation inspection and PRIOR to the placement of concrete and before proceeding with any further construction, a completed, signed and sealed, Foundation Setback and Elevation Certification shall be submitted to the City for review. The certification form shall be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the state of Colorado, stating that the foundation was constructed in compliance with all applicable minimum setback and elevation requirements of the City. Owner/Contractor is responsible for locating property lines and constructing improvements according to the approved plan and required development standards. The City is not responsible for inaccurate information submitted within the plan set and any construction errors resulting from inaccurate information. Prior to issuance of a CO, TWO (2) trees shall be planted within the front setback. In addition, no less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the gross lot area and no less than City of Wheat Ridge Single Family - New PERMIT - 201801378 PERMIT NO: 201801378 ISSUED: 06/27/2018 JOB ADDRESS: 3557 Urban CT EXPIRES: 06/27/2019 JOB DESCRIPTION: New single family home; unfinished basement - 2,441 sq ft; attached garage - 1,070 sq ft plus 776 sq ft RV bay; 2,263 sq ft total *** CONTACTS *** OWNER (303)619-7077 MICHAEL GLAVAN GC (303)437-5568 Garth Stevens 170649 North Tech Contracting LLC SUB (970)214-5985 Kevin P. Herbert 180185 Herbert Instrumentation Srvs. *** PARCEL INFO *** ZONE CODE: UA / Unassigned USE: UA / Unassigned SUBDIVISION CODE: 2403 / APPLEWOOD VILLAGES, PROSPECT V BLOCK/LOT#: / *** FEE SUMMARY *** ESTIMATED PROJECT VALUATION: 400,000.00 FEES Total Valuation 0.00 Plan Review Fee 1,993.58 Use Tax 8,400.00 Permit Fee 3,067.05 Engin. Review Fee 150.00 ** TOTAL ** 13,610.63 *** COMMENTS *** *** CONDITIONS *** Homeowner performing Mechanical and Plumbing work. All roughs to be done at Framing Inspection. Approved per plans and red -line notes on plans. Must comply with 2012 IRC, 2014 NEC and all applicable City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Codes. Work is subject to field inspections. I, the property owner, by my signature, attest that I currently reside at the project property, intend to reside at the property for a period of one year after completion of the project, and am personally performing all work, without the assistance of hired or professional workers. If professionals are hired, those contractors are licensed with the City of Wheat Ridge and are listed on the permit. Consultations and inspections will only be performed with the homeowner of record present. As part of the foundation inspection and PRIOR to the placement of concrete and before proceeding with any further construction, a completed, signed and sealed, Foundation Setback and Elevation Certification shall be submitted to the City for review. The certification form shall be fully completed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed in the state of Colorado, stating that the foundation was constructed in compliance with all applicable minimum setback and elevation requirements of the City. Owner/Contractor is responsible for locating property lines and constructing improvements according to the approved plan and required development standards. The City is not responsible for inaccurate information submitted within the plan set and any construction errors resulting from inaccurate information. Prior to issuance of a CO, TWO (2) trees shall be planted within the front setback. In addition, no less than twenty-five percent (25%) of the gross lot area and no less than one hundred percent (100%) of the front yard shall be landscaped. All landscaping shall be in conformance with Section 26-502 of the Zoning and Development Code. All landscaping shall ve installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan prior to C.O., a landscape escrow agreement with financial guarantee in the amount of 125% of the cost of the installation shall be required. For one- or two-family dwellings, the first twenty-five feet (25&#39;) of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials. A right-of-way permit may be required; contact Public Works Department at 303-235-2861. I, by my signature, do hereby attest that the work to be performed shall comply with all accompanying approved plans and specifications, applicable building codes, and all applicable municipal codes, policies and procedures, and that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property and am authorized to obtain this permit and perform the work described and approved in conjunction with thisppenmt. I further attest that I am legally authorized to include all entities named within this document as parties to the work to be pertbrmed and that all work to be performed is disclosed in this document and/or its' accompanying approved plans and specifications. Signature of OWNER or CONTRACTOR (Circle one) Date 1. This permit was issued based on the information provided in thepermit application and accompanying Flans and specifications and is subject to the compliance with those documents, and all applicable statutes, ordinances, regulations, policies and procedures. 2. This permit shall expire 365 days after the date of issuance regardless of activity. Requests for extension must be made in writing and received prior to the date of expiration. An extension of no more than 180 days made be granted at the discretion of the Chief Building Official and may be subject to a fee equal to one-half of the originalpermit fee. 3. If this permit expires, a new permit may be required to be obtained. Issuance of a new permit shall be subject to the standard requirements, fees androcedures for approval of any new permit. Re -issuance or extension of expired permits is at the sole discretion of the Chief Building Official and is not guaranteed. 4. No work of any manner shall be performed that shall results in a changeof the natural flow of water without prior and specific approval. 5. The permit holder shall notify the Building and Inspection Services Division in accordance with established policy of all required inspections and shall not proceed or conceal work without written approval of such work from the Building and Inspection Services Division. 6. The issuance or granting of a permit shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, an violation of any provision of any applicable code or any ordinance pr regulation of this jurisdiction. Approval of work is subject to field inspection. Signature of Chief BuildinOff c&f"'_" Date REQUESTS MUST BE MADE Y 11:59PM ANY BUSINESS DAY FOR INSPECTION THE FOLLOWING BUSINESS DAY. �A City of 0;ArWh6atp'jdgC RECEIVLL, MAY 1 1 7018 Building & Inspection Services Division 7500 W. 291h Ave., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office: 303-235-2855 * Fax: 303-237-8929 Inspection Line: 303-234-5933 Email: permits[a@ci.wheatridge.co.us FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date: 511111-6 Plan/Permit # gc,/q t /3-7 �r Plan Review Fe Building Permit Application *** Please complete all highlighted areas on both sides of this form. Incomplete applications may not be processed. *** Property Address Owner and Karen Glavan Property Owner Email:_Mglavan@Municipaltreatment.com Tenant (Commercial Projects Only) Property Owner Mailing Address: Address: 12250 W 38th Ave. City, State, Zip Wheat Ridge CO 80033: Architect/Engineer: Bill Myhern EV Studios Phone: 303-619-7077 Architect/Engineer E-mail: BiIIM@EVsutios.com Phone:_303-670-7242 Contractor: City of Wheat Ridge License #: 4q Phone:_303-437-5568 Contractor E-mail Address: Northtechcontractiing@outlook.com _ For Plan Review Questions & Comments (please print): CONTACT NAME _Garth Stevens CONTACT EMAIL(please print): Sub Contractors (Must provide Wheat Ridge License No.): Electrical: Plumbing: W.R. City License # W.R. City License # hone: 303-437-5568 Other City Licensed Sub: Other City Licensed Sub: City License # City License # Mechanical: W.R. City License # COMMERCIAL ® RESIDENTIAL Description of work: For ALL projects, provide a detailed description of work to be performed, including current use of areas, proposed uses, square footage, existing condition and proposed new condition, appliance size and efficiency, type and amount of materials to be used, etc. O�\ Ac -a. C � Z. d Commercial Projects Only: Occupancy Type Sq. Ft./LF OQJC��, BTUs Amps Squares L, 1-i I Construction Type: Gallons Project Value: (Contract value or the cost of all materials and labor included in the entire project) cid OWNER/CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE OF UNDERSTANDING AND AGREEMENT I hereby certify that the setback distances proposed by this permit application are accurate and do not violate applicable ordinances, rules or regulations of the City of Wheat Ridge or covenants, easements or restrictions of record; that all measurements shown and allegations made are accurate; that I have read and agree to abide by all conditions printed on this application and that I assume full responsibility for compliance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge codes and ordinances for work under any permit issued based on this application; that I am the legal owner or have been authorized by the legal owner of the property to perform the described work and am also authorized by the legal owner of any entity included on this application to list that entity on this application. 1, the applicant for this building permit application, warrant the truthfulness of the information provided on the application. CIRCLE ONE: (OWNER) (CONTRACTOR) or (AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE) of (OWNER) c(CONTRACTOR) Signature (first annddlast name): _`%� � // �-''�' DATE: c/ Printed Name: /" rf C�a, � / /dt�'C,A., ZONING COMMMENTS: �t Reviewer: . V T —> I � (Al Lb I BUILDING DEPASTMEN.T CO ENTS: Reviewer: L PUBLIC WORKS COMMENTS: Reviewer. A v lj ����laola DEPARTMENT USE ONLY OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: T'"' CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Y Cr�(T.c - 11 q6 Co) 37.p = 69, zzs gsMT- 7,qq i CxJ . Mmm wt, -,.46-3 Cx 1 101-82 ZZ$r 108 go= grip - L,INac� GSC P"Wv FDEZ IF-Tre .4 % /C UX'4`I IO-r�? Building Division Valuation: _ City of SINGLE FAMIL-YIDUPLEX UBI 9�' c� R catRBUILDING PE�1 P/ IT AP PLI�'�Q TIONAE VIEW Date: Location: 3 57 ATTENTION: BUELDING DIVISION I have reviewed the submitted application documents to construct a located at the above referenced address. Please note the comments checked below. 1. / Drainage: a. Drainage Letter & Plan required: yes No b. Site drainage/grading plan have been reviewed and are: :ZOKO refer to 2. Public Improvements required & to be completed with project: stipulations. a. street paving/patching: Yes --t No b. curb & gutter: yes No Completed c. sidewalk: Yes No Completed Completed d. Other (specify): Yes — No Completed For items not constructed, the amount of funds taken in lieu of construction: 3. -Z Does all existing roadway/alley R.O.W. meet the standards of the City: If not, what is required? If R.O.W. is required, has the deed been received: No Yes No (see Note below) NOTE: All deeds must be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 4. APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and hereby approves this Permit Application, subject to the stated requirements and/or attached stipulations. Signature Mark Van Nattan Date 5. J# NOT APPROVED: The Public Works Department has reviewed the submitted material and does not approve this Permit Application for the stated reason(s): Signature Mark Van Nattan Date 6. 4L Stipulations: 42rWag It 7. 4Z— A Grading Certification Letter from the Engineer -of -Record accompanied by an Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) shall be required prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy. 8. NOTE: ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AS A RESULT OF PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED PER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. Rev 04/2016 City of WheatNidge PUBLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Address: 3557 Urban Ct. Permit Number: 201801378 Approval of this building permit is subject to the following conditions and notes: 1) The maximum allowable slope is 4:1 due to vegetation, stabilization (erosion control) and future maintenance concerns. Grading plan should be adjusted to reflect. 2) Show features such as swales and flow arrows to indicate post -development site follows historic drainage patterns per Colorado water law. 3) Perimeter drain should discharge to areas where runoff is controlled. 4) Direct roof drain downspouts as shown to protect adjacent properties from stormwater runoff. 5) Public improvements such as curb, gutter and sidewalk are required for this property. Completion of driveway connection to Urban Ct. requires sidewalk and gutter to current City standards. A ROW Construction Permit is required prior to the commencement of any work in public ROW. Contact Public Works at 303-235-2861. Utility relocations to be coordinated with appropriate franchised utility company. 6) A new reverse curb chase shall be constructed by applicant's contractor to meet current City standards. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby agrees to pay for installation of said chase. Work shall be one (1) curb chase, complete, in place, as located and directed by City Inspector — please contact Russ Higgins at 303-235-2869. Note: curb chase shall flow from gutter flowline to a location behind sidewalk (see plan and detail). Page 1 of 1 City of �a.� Ridgc t. City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOPMENT IIEVIEW FEES Date: / Location of Construction: -3 E2 - A;:7 UR Purpose of Construction: .t��� �� ���� �t✓� s ®®�!� Single Family 1 Commercial Multi -Family Development Review Processing Fee: ................................................ $100.00 $ (Required of all projects for document processing) Single Family Residence/Duplex Review Fee: ..................................... $50.00 $_5O. 9W Commercial/Multi-Family Review Fees: ® Review of existing or minimal technical documents: ........................ $200.00 $ c Initial review' of technical civil engineering documents (Fee includes reviews of the 1" and 2nd submittals): .......................... $600.00 $ o Traffic Impact Study Review Fee: (Fee includes reviews of the 1 n and 2nd submittals): ........................... $500.00 $ ® Trip Generation Study Review Fee: ............................................... ­ $200.00 $ ® O & M Manual Review & SMA Recording Fee ................................ S100.00 $ ' Each Application will be reviewed by staff once and returned for changes. If after review of the second submittal changes have not been made to the civil documents or the Traffic Study as requested by staff, further reviews of the Application will be subject to the following Resubmittal Fees: ® Resubmittal Fees: 3`d submittal (% initial review fee): .................................................... $300.00 S 4d' submittal (full initial review fee) :................................................. 5600.00 $ All subsequent submittals: ................................................................. $600.00 --- (Full initial review fee) 5 TOTAL REVIEW FEES (due at time of Building Permit issuance): PLEASE NOTE THAT IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE FEES, THERE WILL BE ADDITIONAL LICENSING AND PERMITTING FEES REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. ww NN .ai." hes tridge.co. us Rev 12/12 City of W heat Rdge PUBLIC WORKS City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 NOTIFICATION FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS RESTORATION Dear Contractor: In conjunction with the approval of the building permit application for the above referenced address, this letter is to inform you that all existing public improvements located along the frontage of said address shall be restored, (if damaged from related construction) to an acceptable condition, as determined by City of Wheat Ridge Public Works Department, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Prior to any construction commencing, the City's representative will conduct an onsite inspection to determine the existing condition(s) of the public improvements at this address. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. Sincerely, David F. Brossman, P.L.S. Development Review Engineer CC: File www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Rev 2/08 RESIDENTIAL Building Permit — Plan Review Worksheet Address: 365'3 n & - Zoning: Rev. 09/2017 Lot Size: �„ 5 >0 sq. ft. Lot Width: I Li 0 ft. Property in the flood plain? If yes, notify PW Floodplain Administrator and add surveying condition FLD Subdivision: ('� UAV Any conflict? (Y/N) Related Cases: Type of project (applicable survey conditions in parenthesis): A/ ❑ Accessory ISP, ILC or site plan none if in floodplain (FLD) ❑ Addition ILC and site plan if Win 2' of setback or in floodplain (FND) if in floodplain (FLD) New ILC and site plan pec (FNIIL _� if w/in 2' of setback (NRS) if in floodplain (FLD) Maximum Lot Coverage: �15 % sq. ft. Existing Improvements (footprints): Proposed Improvements (footprints): 22(G 3 House: sq. ft. House/addition: % v'A sq. ft. j'y -i (� Shed: sq. ft. Shed: sq. ft Detached garage: sq ft. Detached Garage: sq. ft. Other: sq. ft. Other: sq. ft. Total Existing sq. ft Proposed+Existing `� �c� sq. ft Lot Coverage C) % Lot Coverage � �c -3 % Required Setbacks: FR S S R Provided Setbacks: FR S : LS S-)_` 15 R For additions or new construction, is the structure within 2 feet of minimum setbacks? A/4-) I add surv.-cendUiGnFND. Maximum Height: j ft. Maximum Size: sq. ft. Proposed Height: ! _ '^' t Proposed Size: LA \ sq. ft. Does the bulk plane apply? (Y/N) If yes, does it meet on all sides (Y/N): FR -- S S R ' (See 26-642' and 26-120.C.1 —applies to all single-family structures (new, addition, accessory) in R -1C and R-3) Parkland Conditions q e S Does the permit result in a new dwelling unit (new structure or conversion from non -res use) . If yes, have parkland dedication fees already been paid (eg with a previous land use approval)?c'S L"'1'`�� If fees are owed, add condition PFEE, notify owner, notify building division, enter fee amou t in ADG. Rev. 09/2017 Streetscape Conditions Does the permit result in any of the following conditions? ❑ Construction of new roads ❑ Platting of new lots 'Er New development ❑ Additions that increase gross floor area (not just the footprint) by 60% or more (proposed floor area — existing floor area ) / existing floor area = % increase If any box above is checked... For SF/DUPLEX—Is there existing ❑ Curb ❑ Gutter L15 -ft+ sidewalk adjacent to the property? If curb, gutter or sidewalk is missing, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required. MULTIFAMILY—Does the frontage meet current city standards? If not, streetscape construction or fees -in -lieu will be required. Fees -in -lieu of dedication or construction are due at the time the permit is issued. Access Conditions (apply to all new driveways, garages, additions, or new homes/units) ❑ For one and two-family dwellings, the first 25' of driveway area from the existing edge of pavement into the site shall be surfaced with concrete, asphalt, brick pavers or similar materials. ❑ For all uses other than one and two family dwellings, no vehicle entrances or exits may be closer than 25' to any property line, except when used as joint access for two or more lots. ❑ In residential zone districts, curb cuts shall be at least 10 feet and not more than 24 feet in width. ❑ One and two-family dwellings may have horseshoe driveways, provided that the street accesses are at least 30 feet apart, measured from the interior edges. ❑ For all uses, one access point per property is permitted. Landscaping Conditions (apply to additions and new dwelling units) ❑ For one -and two-family dwellings, one tree for every 70 feet of street frontage is required. Frontage idth of driveway �� / 70 = �� (round up for required trees) o:.lc,- Street trees required: Street trees provided: ❑ 1 o an 250%, of the entire lot must be landscaped prior to issuance of C.O. ❑ In the event that landscaping cannot be installed due to inclement weather prior to the issuance of a C.O., an escrow agreement with financial guarantees may be allowed to ensure future installation. 125% of the cost of the proposed improvements will be required with the agreement. These funds will be reimbursed back to the property owner or contractor once the improvements are in place. Dwelling Unit ❑ Not approved as an independent dwelling unit. City of wh6atj�idge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUB -CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZATION FORM *This application must be signed by each sub -contractor confirming the same. Project Address: 7 -,FT ? 4e , � ,,.,. C Permit General Contractor: Electrical Contractor - Wheat Ridge License # Company Name: Phone #: State License #: Master #: Signature of Authorized Agent Date Company Name: , ,�,� s�,,, pr- Phone #: 70'7- -61 -7Q ? State License #: Master #: Signature of thorized Agent Date Mechanical Contractor - Wheat Ridge License # Company Name:/,4,,,� �,�„ ��, Phone: .Sd7-G / p -?or 7 7 Signature of A orized Agent Date *This application must be signed by each sub -contractor confirming the same. After Recording Return To: CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC. 7600 EAST ORCHARD ROAD #250-N GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 ATTN: Prepared By: CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO., INC. 7600 E. ORCHARD RD #250-N GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 (303) 320-4040 [Space Above This Line For Recording Data] DEED OF TRUST GLAVAN Loan #f: 197909213 MIN:100030201979092133 HERS Phone: 1-888-679-6377 PIN: 3130030760 DEFINITIONS Words used in multiple sections of this document are defined below and other words are defiled in Sections 3, 11, 13, 18, 20 and 21. Certain rules regarding the usage of words used in this document are also provided in Section 16. (A) "Security Instrument" means this document, which is dated SEPTEMBER 18, 2013, together with all Riders to this document. (B) "Borrower" is MICHAEL S. GLAVAN AND KAREN GLAVAN. Borrower is the trustor under this Security Instrument. (C) "Lender" is CHERRY CREEK MORTGAGE CO. , INC.. Lender is a CORPORATION organized and existing under the laws of THE STATE OF COLORADO. Lender's address is 7600 E. ORCHARD RD #250-N, GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111. (D) "Trustee" is the Public Trustee of JEFFERSON County, Colorado. (E) "HERS" is Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. MFRS is a separate corporation that is acting solely as a nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns. MFRS is the beneficiary under this Security Instrument. MFRS is organized and existing under the laws of Delaware, and has an address and telephone number of P.O. Box 2026, Flint, MI 48501-2026, tel. (888) 679-MERS. (F) "Nate" means the promissory note signed by Borrower and dated SEPTEMBER 18, 2013. The Note COLORADO -Single Family -Fannie Mae/Freddie Alac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT IM 313.15 Page I of 16 Form 30061/01 1111R. r11,1,R11 III 197909213 states that Borrower owes Lender THREE HUNDRED FIFTY-ONE THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND 00/100 Dollars (U.S. $351, 500.00) plus interest. Borrower has promised to pay this debt in regular Periodic Payments and to pay the debt in full not later than OCTOBER 1, 2043. (G) "Property" means the property that is described below under the heading "Transfer of Rights in the Property." (H) "Loan" means the debt evidenced by the Note, plus interest, any prepayment charges and late charges due under the Note, and all sums due under this Security hlstrument, plus interest. (I) "Riders" means all Riders to this Security Instrument that are executed by Borrower. The following Riders are to be executed by Borrower [check box as applicable]: O Adjustable Rate Rider O Condominium Rider O Second Home Rider ❑Balloon Rider ❑Planned Unit Development Rider OBiweekly Payment Rider O 1-4 Family Rider OOther(s) [specify] (3) "Applicable Lav" means all controlling applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, ordinances and administrative rules and orders (that have the effect of Jaw) as well as all applicable filial, non -appealable judicial opinions. (K) "Community Association Dues, Fees, and Assessments" means all dues, fees, assessments and other charges that are imposed on Borrower or the Property by a condominium association, homeowners association or similar organization. (L) "Electronic Funds Transfer" means any transfer of funds, other than a transaction originated by check, draft, or similar paper instrument, which is initiated through an electronic terminal, telephonic instrument, computer, or magnetic tape so as to order, instruct, or authorize a financial institution to debit or credit an account. Such term includes, but is not limited to, point-of-sale transfers, automated teller machine transactions, transfers initiated by telephone, wire transfers, and automated clearinghouse transfers. (M) "Escrow Items" means those items that are described in Section 3. (N) "Miscellaneous Proceeds" means any compensation, settlement, award of damages, or proceeds paid by any third party (other than insurance proceeds paid under the coverages described in Section 5) for: (i) damage to, or destruction of, the Property; (ii) condemnation or other taking of all or any part of the Property; (iii) conveyance in lieu of condemnation; or (iv) misrepresentations of, or omissions as to, the value and/or condition of the Property. (0) "Mortgage Insurance" means insurance protecting Lender against the nonpayment of, or default on, the Loan. COLORADO -Single Family-Fannic Mae/Freddie Mac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT M 313.15 Page 2 of 16 Form 3006 1/01 197909213 (P) "Periodic Payment" means the regularly scheduled amount due for (i) principal and interest under the Note, plus (ii) any amounts under Section 3 of this Security Instrument. (Q) "RESPA" means the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (12 U.S.C. §2601 et seq.) and its implementing regulation, Regulation X (12 C.F.R. Part 1024), as they might be amended from time to time, or any additional or successor legislation or regulation that governs the same subject matter. As used in this Security Instrument, "RESPA" refers to all requirements and restrictions that are imposed in regard to a "federally related mortgage loan" even if the Loan does not qualify as a "federally related mortgage loan" under RESPA. (R) "Successor in Interest of Borrower" means any party that has taken title to the Property, whether or not that party has assumed Borrower's obligations under the Note and/or this Security Instrument. TRANSFER OF RIGHTS IN THE PROPERTY The beneficiary of this Security Instrument is MERS (solely as nominee for Lender and Lenders successors and assigns) and the successors and assigns of MERS. This Security Instrument secures to Lender: (i) the repayment of the Loan, and all renewals, extensions and modifications of the Note; and (ii) the performance of Borrower's covenants and agreements under this Security Instrument and the Note. For this purpose, Borrower, in consideration of the debt and the trust herein created, irrevocably grants and conveys to Trustee, in trust, with power of sale, the following described property located in the COUNTY (Type of Recording Jurisdiction) of JEFFERSON: (Name of Recording Jurisdiction) SEE ATTACHED which currently has the address of 12250 WEST 38TH AVENUE, WHEAT RIDGE, Colorado 80033 ("Property Address"): TOGETHER WITH all the improvements now or hereafter erected on the property, and all casements, appurtenances, and fixtures now or hereafter a part of the property. All replacements and additions shall also be covered by this Security Instrument. All of the foregoing is referred to in this Security Instrument as the "Property." Borrower understands and agrees that MERS holds only legal title to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) has the right: to exercise any or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell ti►e Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, releasing and canceling this Security Instrument. BORROWER COVENANTS that Borrower is lawfully seised of the estate hereby conveyed and has the right to grant and convey the Property and that the Property is unencumbered, except for encumbrances of record. Borrower warrants and will defend generally the title to the Property against all claims and demands, subject to any encumbrances of record and liens for taxes for the current year not yet due and payable. THIS SECURITY INSTRUMENT combines uniform covenants for national use and non-uniform COLORADO -Single Family -Fannie Mae/Freddie Efac UNIFORM INSTRUMENT 10 313.15 Page 3 of 16 Form 30061/01 IIII ��%;S II 197909213 covenants with limited variations by jurisdiction to constitute a uniform security instrument covering real property. UNIFORM COVENANTS. Borrower and Lender covenant and agree as follows: I. Payment of Principal, Interest, Escrow Items, Prepayment Charges, and Late Charges. Borrower shall pay when due the principal of, and interest on, the debt evidenced by the Note and any prepayment charges and late charges due tinder the Note. Borrower shall also pay fluids for Escrow Items pursuant to Section 3. Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument shall be made in U.S. currency. However, if any check or other instrument received by Lender as payment wader the Note or this Security Instrument is returned to Lender unpaid, Lender may require that any or all subsequent payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument be made in one or more of tine following forms, as selected by Lender: (a) cash; (b) money order; (c) certified check, bank check, treasurer's check or cashier's check, provided any such check is drawn upon an institution whose deposits are insured by a federal agency, instrumentality, or entity; or (d) Electronic Funds Transfer. Payments are deemed received by Lender when received at the location designated in the Note or at such other location as may be designated by Lender in accordance with the notice provisions in Section 15. Lender may return any payment or partial payment if the payment or partial payments are insufficient to bring the Loan current. Lender may accept any payment or partial payment insufficient to bring the Loan current, without waiver of any rights hereunder or prejudice to its rights to refuse such payment or partial payments in the future, but Lender is not obligated to apply such payments at the time such payments are accepted. If each Periodic Payment is applied as of its scheduled due date, then Lender need not pay interest on unapplied funds. Lender may ]hold such unapplied funds until Borrower makes payment to bring file Loan current. If Borrower does not do so within a reasonable period of time, Lender shall either apply such funds or return them to Borrower. If not applied earlier, such funds will be applied to the outstanding principal balance under the Note immediately prior to foreclosure. No offset or claim which Borrower might have now or in tine future against Lender shall relieve Borrower from making payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument or performing the covenants and agreements secured by this Security Instrument. 2. Application of Payments or Proceeds. Except as otherwise described in this Section 2, all payments accepted and applied by Lender shall be applied in the following order of priority: (a) interest due under the Note; (b) principal due under the Note; (c) announts due under Section 3. Such payments shall be applied to each Periodic Payment in the order in which it became due. Any remaining amounts shall be applied first to late charges, second to any other amounts due under this Security Instrument, and then to reduce tine principal balance of the Note. If Lender receives a payment from Borrower for a delinquent Periodic Payment which includes a sufficient amount to pay any late charge due, the payment may be applied to the delinquent payment and the late charge. If more than one Periodic Payment is outstanding, Lender may apply any payment received from Borrower to tine repayment of the Periodic Payments if, and to tine extent that, each payment can be paid in full. To the extent that any excess exists after the payment is applied to the full payment of one or more Periodic Payments, such excess may be applied to any late charges due. Voluntary prepayments shall be applied first to any prepayment charges and then as described in the Note. COLORADO -Single Family -Fannie Mae/Freddie Mae UNIFORM INSTRUMENT M 313.15 Page 4 of 16 Form 30061/01 It kill 611�' R, r City of f �Zcat. PI'dgc CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BUILDING AND INSPECTION SERVICES DIVISION 7500 W 29th Ave Wheat Ndge, CO 80033.8001 p. 303.235.2855.f 303.237.8929 A copy of this form must be completed by each agency Indicated on the Permit Submittal Checklist for the project type and be attached to the Building Permit Application at the time of submission. Applications presented for submission without a completed Proof of Submission form from a required agency will not be accepted or processed, Date: 5/8/2018 Project Address: 3557 Urban Cl, Name of Firm/individual submitting documents: Michael Glavan Project Type/Description: Single Family Residential Home Signature of Firm Representative or Individual: DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS POINT - FOR AGENCY USE ONL I, I- uy, and do, by my signature below, hereby ac the project Indicated above. AaencY represented: (Please check one) o West Metro Fire Protection o Arvada Fire Protection o Wheat Ridge Water District v, Consolidated Mutual Water District o Valley Water District o Denver Water am a duty authorized representative of the agency indicated below nowledge receipt of documents necessary for review and approval of Agency Notes:r Signature: o Wheat Ridge Sanitation District o Clear Creek Sanitation District o Fruitdale Sanitation District o Westridge Sanitation District o Other 11` MAY 1 1 2018 Pe � 00, or W 116 -at Fl(jge CITY OF XV1IEAT 1110011 BUILDING AND 1NSPCCTION SERVICES DIVISION 7S001V 291h Ave %Vheai 11fdge, Co 80033.8001 p. 303,235.2855.f 303.237.8929 Proof of Submission for Permitting/Plan Review A copy of this form must be completed by each agency Indlcated on the Permit Submittal Checklist for the project type and be attached to the Building Permit Application at the time of submission. Applications presented for submission without a completed Proof of Submission form from a required agency will not be accepted or processed, Date: 5/8/2018 Project Address: 3557 Urban Ct. Name of Ftrmlindividual submitting documents: Mlchael Glavan _ Projeqt Type/Description: single Family Residential Home Signature of Firm Representative or Individual: C DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS POINT - FOR AGENCY USE ONLY I, am a duly authorized representative of the agency Indicated below and do, by my signature be ow, hereby acknowledge receipt of documents necessary for review and approval of the project indicated above. haency representedt (Please check one) o West Metro Fire Protection o Wheat Ridge Sanitation District o Arvada Fire Protection o Clear Creek Sanitation District o Wheat Ridge Water District o Fruitdale Sanitation District o Consolidated Mutual Water District o Westrldge Sanitation District o Valley Water District o Denver Water Other �Jc3y�tt�wEsf L +rG�u�uu Sp��►rtzszT Agency Notes: signature:/?'//11Date: (Agency Representative) RECEIVED /1'!a A u/ es-} e cc 1 MAX 1 i Z01$ , o14 013-7 � May 8, 2018 Mike Glavan Email: mglaven@municipaltreatment.com Re: NWLSD — 3557 Urban Ct. — Sanitary Service Availability Martin/Martin, Inc Project No.: 17.0638.C.01 Dear Mr. Glaven, On behalf of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District (NWLSD), Martin/Martin Inc., acting as the District's Consulting Engineer, offers the following in response to the Site Plan received May 8`h, 2018 concerning a single-family home at the above reference address. The Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District has no objections with the proposed development conditional on the items identified herein are fully addressed. The following are general requirements for sanitary sewer service. Rules, Regulations and Standards of Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District must be complied with at all times. The subject lot at the address referenced above is within the boundary and service area of the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District. Treatment of sewage generated within the Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District is provided by the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (Metro). Existing Sanitary Sewer Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District has the following sanitary sewer main(s) in the vicinity of the proposed property: • 8 -inch mainline running north to south, east of the referenced property within Urban Ct. It appears the property may be serviced by gravity flow; however, the homeowner/developer is responsible for determining horizontal locations and vertical depths of the existing sanitary sewer main and to verify if gravity flow is feasible or if a private individual sewage ejector (lift station) is required. The issuance of a sewer tap permit by the District does not in any way guarantee that the property can be served by gravity flow. All lots (buildings) shall have individual services. All service connections shall be made at least 5' downstream of District manholes. Sanitary details for a service wye connection can be provided upon request. Costs All costs involved are to be deposited in advance — tap fees, observation/inspection fees— are the responsibility of the Owner/Developer at the then current rate fee structure. A minimum 72 -hour notice prior to construction is required following District receipt of all fees. These fee amounts can be paid directly to the District Office prior to connection, payable to Northwest Lakewood Sanitation District, which also collects Metro Wastewater's "connection fees". Any questions regarding this document, please contact us at (303) 431-6100. Sincerely, Bill Willis, PE Cc: AJ Beckman — SDMSI, Inc. Tim Flynn — Collins, Cockrel, Cole 12499 WES( CCLFAX,'VtN'J' LAKEWOOD, CCLORAD.0 S%i 15 AMAIN 343.431.6100 MARTINIMARI N.COM y City of �Wheat�idge BLIC WORKS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Address: 3557 Urban Ct. Permit Number: 201801378 Approval of this building permit is subject to the following conditions and notes: 1) The maximum allowable slope is 4:1 due to vegetation, stabilization (erosion control) and future maintenance concerns. Grading plan should be adjusted to reflect. 2) Show features such as swales and flow arrows to indicate post -development site follows historic drainage patterns per Colorado water law. 3) Perimeter drain should discharge to areas where runoff is controlled. 4) Direct roof drain downspouts as shown to protect adjacent properties from stormwater runoff. 5) Public improvements such as curb, gutter and sidewalk are required for this property. Completion of driveway connection to Urban Ct. requires sidewalk and gutter to current City standards. A ROW Construction Permit is required prior to the commencement of any work in public ROW. Contact Public Works at 303-235-2861. Utility relocations to be coordinated with appropriate franchised utility company. 6) A new reverse curb chase shall be constructed by applicant's contractor to meet current City standards. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby agrees to pay for installation of said chase. Work shall be one (1) curb chase, complete, in place, as located and directed by City Inspector — please contact Russ Higgins at 303-235-2869. Note: curb chase shall flow from gutter flowline to a location behind sidewalk (see plan and detail). Page 1 of 1 L GUTTER LIP TO BACK OF WALK C SECTION A -A DETAIL "A" HOT DIPPED GALVENIZED STEEL TREAD PLATE 2" X 2" X a" GALVANIZED ANGLE IRON z" X a" COUNTERSINK SCREWS, 3 DRILLED AND TAPPE41D PER SIDE (SCREWS TO BE IN PLACE AT THE TIME OF POUR TO KEEP THREADS CLEAN.) 2" X 4" ANCHOR BOLT WELDED TO ANGLE IRON @ 2'-0" O.C. SW VARIES FL (SEE PLANS) 2' 7,. 1"/FT 1,2" FT 6„ --� --� 2'-3" . 7 -for 2'-8" wide Reverse Chase Section mountable sidewalk) SECTION B -B MOUNTABLE CURB MEASUREMENT: EACH PAYMENT: SC OR SC2 SIDEWALK CHASE `►l41 11 City of `�qM�heatF�dge DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION U -A01 CURB.CHASE SIDEWALK CHASE 2OF2 APPROVED BY: SN APPROVE DATE 10/2016 You created this PDF from an application that is not licensed to print to novaPDF printer (http://www. nova pdf.com) DETAIL CODE U CGenerated by REScheck-Web Software 41(i Compliance Certificate Project Graven Residence Energy Code: Location: Construction Type: Project Type: Orientation: Conditioned Floor Area Glazing Area Climate Zone: Permit Date: Permit Number: 2012 IECC Wheat Ridge, Colorado Single-family New Construction Bldg. faces 135 deg. from North 2,263 ft2 23% 5 (6158 HDD) Construction Site: Owner/Agent: 3557 Urban Ct Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 (- city or �wh M DMLOPMEMr'--o APPROVED 4pla",vif d€S�20 iancgna, __61 Date it. r nr ,ssuonce of o pr.m;r m e„prwp/ p�� y�V «�MIIYIMne sho;not bP a Ce�mR Jor, w pp rorvl oLany rabuonw ot.,t.e:M w r,. aurn�o..;+ry1 ,ro �Rl a �i1i,.snce,. �l.nra �aMsaraMw�sa,yt men'°n+„anM[nef�M�g North Tech�Co lracting 4905 Ellis Street Golden, Colorado 80403 northtechcontractingooutlook.com Compliance: Passes using ILIA trade-off Compliance: 34.5% Better Than Code Maximum UA: 493 Your UA: 323 The % Better or Worse Than Code Index reflects how close to compliance the house is based on code trade-off rules. It DOES NOT provide an estimate of energy use or cost relative to a minimum -code home. Envelope Assemblies Ceiling: Raised or Energy Truss Wall: Insulated Concrete Forms Orientation: Front Door: Solid Door (under 50% glazing) Orientation: Front Door: Solid Door (under 50% glazing) Orientation: Front Door: Glass Door (over 50% glazing) Orientation: Front Door: Glass Door (over 50% glazing) Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame Orientation: Front Window copy: Vinyl Frame Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame Orientation: Front Project Title: Graven Residence Data filename: 2,263 49.0✓ 49.0 0.010 23 680 27.5 0.039 8 Report date: 05/03/18 !Soo) 9 Pagel of 9 24 0.210 5 21 0.210 4 64 0.300 19 96 0.300 29 55 0.300 17 30 0.300 9 10 0.300 3 Pe . - £ 10 0.300 3 8 0.300 2 Report date: 05/03/18 !Soo) 9 Pagel of 9 Window: Vinyl Frame 34 0.300 10 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 8 0.300 2 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 30 0.300 9 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 45 0.300 14 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 30 0.300 9 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 8 0.300 2 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 8 0.300 2 Orientation: Front Wall: Insulated Concrete Forms 340 27.5 0.039 13 Orientation: Left side Wall: Insulated Concrete Forms 700 27.5 0.039 27 Orientation: Back Wall: Insulated Concrete Forms 510 27.5 0.039 20 Orientation: Right side Basement: Insulated Concrete Forms 680 27.5 0.031 18 Orientation: Front Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 9.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Window: Vinyl Frame 45 0.300 14 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 20 0.300 6 Orientation: Front Window: Vinyl Frame 20 0.300 6 Orientation: Front Basement: Insulated Concrete Forms 340 27.5 0.031 11 Orientation: Left side Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 9.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Basement: Insulated Concrete Forms 700 27.5 0.031 22 Orientation: Back Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 9.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Basement: Insulated Concrete Forms 510 27.5 0.031 16 Orientation: Unspecified Wall height: 10.0' Depth below grade: 9.0' Insulation depth: 10.0' Compliance Statement: The proposed building design described here is consistent with the building plans, specifications, and other calculations submitted with the permit application. The proposed building has been designed to meet the 2012 IECC requirements in REScheck Version : REScheck-Web and to comply with the mandatory requirements listed in the REScheck Inspection Checklist. Name - Title Signature Date Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 2 of 9 CREScheck Software Version : REScheck-Web �J( Inspection Checklist Energy Code: 2012 IECC Requirements: 0.0% were addressed directly in the REScheck software Text in the "Comments/Assumptions" column is provided by the user in the REScheck Requirements screen. For each requirement, the user certifies that a code requirement will be met and how that is documented, or that an exception is being claimed. Where compliance is itemized in a separate table, a reference to that table is provided. Section # Pre-Inspection/Plan Review Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Re .ID 103.1, Construction drawings and ❑Complies 103.2 documentation demonstrate []Does Not [PR1]1 energy code compliance for the []Not Observable building envelope. ❑Not Applicable 103.1, Construction drawings and ❑Complies 103.2, documentation demonstrate ❑Does Not 403.7 energy code compliance for ❑Not Observable [PR3]1 lighting and mechanical systems. ❑Not Applicable Systems serving multiple dwelling units must demonstrate compliance with the IECC Commercial Provisions. 302.1, Heating and cooling equipment is Heating: Heating: ❑Complies 403.6 sized per ACCA Manual S based Btu/hr Btu/hr ❑Does Not [PR2]2 on loads calculated per ACCA Cooling:Cooling: ❑Not Observable Manual J or other methods Btu/hr Btu/hr []Not Applicable PP approved by the code official. Additional Comments/Assumptions: High Impact (Tier 1) 1 2 (Medium Impact (Tier 2) 1 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 3 of 9 Section # Foundation Inspection T;Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Re .ID 402.1.1 Conditioned basement wall R- R- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [F04]1 insulation R -value. Where interior R_ R- ❑Does Not table for values. m insulation is used, verification ❑Not Observable may need to occur during ❑Not Applicable Insulation Inspection. Not required in warm -humid locations in Climate Zone 3. 303.2 Conditioned basement wall [Complies (F05]1 insulation installed per ❑Does Not manufacturer's instructions. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.2.8 Conditioned basement wall ft ft ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies [F06]1 insulation depth of burial or []Does Not table for values. distance from top of wall. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 303.2.1 A protective covering is installed ❑Complies [FO11]2 to protect exposed exterior ❑Does Not insulation and extends a ❑Not Observable minimum of 6 in. below grade. ❑Not Applicable 403.8 Snow- and ice -melting system ❑Complies [FO12]2 controls installed. ❑Does Not F ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: dilde"c D`viso 11 High Impact (Tier 1) 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 1 low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 4 of 9 Section # Framing / Rough -In Inspection Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Re .ID 402.1.1, Door U -factor. U- U- []Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.3.4 []Does Not table for values. [FR111 []Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, Glazing U -factor (area -weighted U- U- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.3.1, average). ❑Does Not table for values. 402.3.3, ❑ Not Observable 402.3.6, ❑ Not Applicable 402.5 [FR2]1 303.1.3 U -factors of fenestration products ❑Complies [FR4]1 are determined in accordance ❑Does Not with the NFRC test procedure or ❑Not Observable taken from the default table. []Not Applicable 402.4.1.1 Air barrier and thermal barrier ❑Complies [FR23]1 installed per manufacturer's ❑Does Not instructions. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.4.3 Fenestration that is not site built ❑Complies [FR20]1 is listed and labeled as meeting ❑Does Not AAMA /WDMA/CSA 101/I.S.2/A440 ❑Not Observable or has infiltration rates per NFRC ❑Not Applicable 400 that do not exceed code limits. 402.4.4 IC -rated recessed lighting fixtures ❑Complies [FR16]2 sealed at housing/interior finish ❑Does Not and labeled to indicate :52.0 cfm ❑Not Observable leakage at 75 Pa. []Not Applicable 403.2.1 Supply ducts in attics are R- R- ❑Complies [FR12]1 insulated to 2tR-8. All other ducts R- R- ❑Does Not in unconditioned spaces or ❑Not Observable outside the building envelope are ❑Not Applicable insulated to zR-6. 403.2.2 All joints and seams of air ducts, ❑Complies [FR13]1 air handlers, and filter boxes are ❑Does Not sealed. ❑Not Observable _ ❑Not Applicable 403.2.3 Building cavities are not used as ❑Complies [FR15]3 ducts or plenums. []Does Not []Not Observable []Not Applicable 403.3 HVAC piping conveying fluids R- R- ❑Complies [FR17]2 above 105 °F or chilled fluids ❑Does Not below 55 °F are insulated to zR- ❑Not Observable - 3. ❑Not Applicable 403.3.1 Protection of insulation on HVAC ❑Complies [FR24]1 piping. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.4.2 Hot water pipes are insulated to R- R- ❑Complies [FR18]2 zR-3. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 1 I High Impact (Tier 1) 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) 1 - Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 5 of 9 Section # Framing / Rough -in Inspection & Req.ID 403.5 Automatic or gravity dampers are [FR19]2 installed on all outdoor air t* intakes and exhausts. Additional Comments/Assumptions: Plans VerifiedI I Field Verified Complies? Value Value uc.ompnes ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Comments/Assumptions 111 High Impact (Tier 1) 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 6 of 9 Section # Insulation Inspection Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Re .ID 303.1 All installed insulation is labeled ❑Complies [IN13]2 or the installed R -values ❑Does Not - provided. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.1.1, Wall insulation R -value. If this is a R- R- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.2.5, mass wall with at least 1/2 of the ❑ Wood ❑ Wood ❑Does Not table for values. 402.2.6 wall insulation on the wall ❑ Mass ❑ Mass ❑Not Observable [IN3]1 exterior, the exterior insulation E] Steel ❑Steel []Not Applicable requirement applies (FR10). 303.2 Wall insulation is installed per ❑Complies [IN4]1 manufacturer's instructions. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 11 High Impact (Tier 1) 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) ,N Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 7 of 9 Section # Final Inspection Provisions Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Re .ID 402.1.1, Ceiling insulation R -value. R- R- ❑Complies See the Envelope Assemblies 402.2.1, ❑ Wood ❑ Wood ❑Does Not table for values. 402.2.2, E] Steel ❑ Steel [-]Not Observable 402.2.6 ❑ Not Applicable [FI1]1 303.1.1.1, Ceiling insulation installed per ❑Complies 303.2 manufacturer's instructions. ❑Does Not [FI2]1 Blown insulation marked every ❑Not Observable 300 ft2. ❑Not Applicable 402.2.3 Vented attics with air permeable ❑Complies [F122]2 insulation include baffle adjacent ❑Does Not to soffit and eave vents that ❑Not Observable extends over insulation. ❑Not Applicable 402.2.4 Attic access hatch and door R- R- ❑Complies [FI3]1 insulation all -value of the ❑Does Not 21 adjacent assembly. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 402.4.1.2 Blower door test @ 50 Pa. <=5 ACH 50 = ACH 50 = ❑Complies [F117]1 ach in Climate Zones 1-2, and ❑Does Not _ <=3 ach in Climate Zones 3-8. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.2.2 Duct tightness test result of <=4 cfm/100 cfm/100 ❑Complies [FI4]1 cfm/100 ft2 across the system or ft2 ft2 ❑Does Not <=3 cfm/100 ft2 without air ❑Not Observable handler @ 25 Pa. For rough -in ❑Not Applicable tests, verification may need to occur during Framing Inspection. 403.2.2.1 Air handler leakage designated ❑Complies [FI24]1 by manufacturer at <=2% of ❑Does Not design air flow. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.1.1 Programmable thermostats ❑Complies [Fl9]2 installed on forced air furnaces. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.1.2 Heat pump thermostat installed ❑Complies [FI10]2 on heat pumps. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.4.1 Circulating service hot water ❑Complies [FI11]2 systems have automatic or ❑Does Not accessible manual controls. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 403.5.1 All mechanical ventilation system ❑Complies [F125]2 fans not part of tested and listed ❑Does Not HVAC equipment meet efficacy ❑Not Observable and air flow limits. ❑Not Applicable 404.1 75% of lamps in permanent ❑Complies [F16]1 fixtures or 75% of permanent ❑Does Not fixtures have high efficacy lamps. ❑Not Observable Does not apply to low -voltage ❑Not Applicable lighting. 111 High Impact (Tier 1) J 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 8 of 9 Section # Final Inspection Provisions Plans Verified Value Field Verified Value Complies? Comments/Assumptions & Re .ID 404.1.1 Fuel gas lighting systems have ❑Complies [FI23]3 no continuous pilot light. ❑Does Not ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable 401.3 Compliance certificate posted. ❑Complies [F[7]2 []Does Not _ ❑Not Observable []Not Applicable 303.3 Manufacturer manuals for ❑Complies [FI18]3 mechanical and water heating ❑Does Not systems have been provided. ❑Not Observable ❑Not Applicable Additional Comments/Assumptions: 11 High Impact (Tier 1) 2 1 Medium Impact (Tier 2) 3 1 Low Impact (Tier 3) Project Title: Graven Residence Report date: 05/03/18 Data filename: Page 9 of 9 2012 IECC Energy Efficiency Certificate Above -Grade Wall 27.50 Below -Grade Wall 27.50 Floor 0.00 Ceiling / Roof 98.00 Ductwork (unconditioned spaces): Window 0.30 Door 0.30 Heating System: Cooling System: Water Heater: Name: Date: Comments Radjant • S/N" I979 ••s N S] HEATING musT BB CALCULATION HEATED AREA Basement west 1300 0.25 70 23000 52000 Basement east 1300 Master Suite 800 _ GrtRm/Kit/Din/Nk 800 Entry Bdrms/Den 800 RV Garage 760 Michael Glavan :412-ol got 49787 0.25 70 23000 52000 0.3 70 17000 32000 0.4 70 22500 32000 0.35 70 19800 32000 0.4 60 18500 30200 Notes: Estimated Heat Required = 124,000 btu. For your consideration we have a 95% efficient, LP or NG, Direct Vent with pvc pipe, american GT 540 tankless unit that is delivered for $1,599.95 plus $239.95 for the concentric vent kit and isolator valve kit that meets your project estimated heating and hot water needs. SOME IMPORTANT NOTES ABOUT FREE DESIGN ASSISTANCE 1. A complete design for an underfloor radiant heating system would include a complete review of the plans, a study of State and Local Building codes, a detailed heat loss calculation, coordination with the builder, several site visits, coordination with the supplier of the heating unit, a written contract, and a fee of several thousand dollars. 2. This free service is not to be confused with a complete design. It is intended to be useful to the customer for making preliminary decisions This information is given in good faith, but Radiantec Company makes no warranty or assumes no liability for its accuracy. 3. It is not possible for Radiantec Company to be aware of the ramifications of all State and Local building codes. Code compliance is the customer's responsibilit, Radiantec Company will assist the customer in obtaining waivers or exceptions when new technology conflicts with applicable codes. Radiantec Company will not apply restocking fees if exchanges are needed to meet applicable codes. Z �V4 ik ,_Z Radiantv*�c9 Al MCI 154 CALCULATIC HEATED AREA Future Zone Notes PROJECT NAME: Michael Glavan 49787 0 0 0 0 0 Estimated Heat Required = 124,000 btu. For your consideration we have a 95% efficient, LP or NG, Direct Vent with pvc pipe, american GT 540 tankless unit that is delivered for $1,599.95 plus $239.95 for the concentric vent kit and isolator valve kit that meets your project estimated heating and hot water needs. SOME IMPORTANT NOTES ABOUT FREE DESIGN ASSISTANCE 1. A complete design for an underfloor radiant heating system would include a complete review of the plans, a study of State and Local Building codes, a detailed heat loss calculation, coordination with the builder, several site visits, coordination with the supplier of the heating unit, a written contract, and a fee of several thousand dollars. 2. This free service is not to be confused with a complete design. It is intended to be useful to the customer for making preliminary decisions This information is given in good faith, but Radiantec Company makes no warranty or City of assumes no liability for its accuracy. 3. It is not possible for Radiantec Company to be aware of the ramifications of all State and Local building codes. Wheat Ridge Code compliance is the customer's responsibility. Radiantec Company will assist the customer in obtaining waivers Building Divison, or exceptions when new technology conflicts with applicable codes. Radiantec Company will not apply restocking fees if exchanges are needed to meet applicable codes. Tj7j ENGINE EOTECHNicAt ENGINEERING-.--QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTtONS-`'.*ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSE R E C E V E 0" Geotechnical Engineering Report A Y f Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 41,ler- �a-.� � t✓ -4s' �' o-hr�'6G /C W � e o�o�rerr' l3 Mr.Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 19 (901379' October 3, 2017 Mr.Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re: Geotechnical Investigation Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Project No: D 17G 146 Mr. Glavan: ENGINEERING ` Pursuant to your request, Triax Engineering, LLC ("Triax") has completed the Geotechnical Investigation for Single family residence at 12550 W 38th Avenue in Wheat Ridge, CO. The attached report presents the results of the field investigation and laboratory testing and recommendations for foundation type and bearing pressures and other recommendations related to the proposed construction. We appreciate and wish to thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If we can be of additional assistance, please contact us at (72'0) 230-1931. Very Truly Y Triax Engin ItBvlr 1 r e Vinod. Ravindran, President Distribution: Via Email RAVIN C d by Vaud 45421 4 sr eviewed �" �t�, Crfy Of "'Meet n; r Table of Contents nts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 1. INTRODUCTION: 1 2.0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: 3.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES: 1 4.0 SITE CONDITIONS: 5.0 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION: 2 6.0 GENERAL SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS: 3 7.0 GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS: 4 8.0 DESIGN ENGINEERING ANALYSIS: 4 8.1 SHALLOW SPREAD FOOTINGS: 9.0 SLAB ON GRADE CONSTRUCTION: 6 0.0 POST CONSTRUCTION VERTICAL MOVEMENT: 11.0 LATERAL LOADS: g 12.0 DRAINAGE: 9 13.OSITE PREPARATION: 10 14.0 STRUCTURAL FILL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS: 10 15.0 EXCAVATIONS AND SHORING: 11 16.0 LIMITATIONS: 12 City of Irl -'Creat hide GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •:• QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS•: ENVIRONMENTAL List of Tables and Figures Table 1 Summary of Field Exploration.......................................................... Table 2 Subsurface Stratigraphy..................................................................... Table 3 Groundwater Conditions.................................................................... Table 4 Allowable Bearing Capacities........................................................... Table 5 Slab Perfonnance Risk....................................................................... Table 6 Equivalent fluid pressures.................................................................. Table 7 Compaction Specifications................................................................ Attachments: Boring Location Plan Boring Logs Key to Classification Terms Laboratory Test Results ................................................... 3 ..................................................... 3 ..................................................... 4 ..................................................... 5 ....................................................... ..................................................... 8 ....... ...................... .............. I....... 11 City of 110)eat Ric , J {J .� GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING•:-QAJQC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS -.'-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC 1. Introduction: This report presents the results of our Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed single family residence at 12550 W 38th Avenue in Wheat Ridge, CO. The object of this investigation was to evaluate the physical properties of the soils underlying the site and provide foundation and earthwork recommendations based on our findings. 2.0 Proposed Construction: It is our understanding that the proposed construction will consist of approximately 2,000 sq. ft. of single family residence. The proposed construction will consist of concrete floor system, concrete foundation walls and wood frame construction above grade. Although foundation loads are unknown at the time of this report, it is anticipated that the structure will be loaded with column and wall loads on the order of 18 kips and 2 kips per linear foot, respectively. Should designs details differ from those presented, this firm should be notified so we can provide additional recommendations, if required. 3.0 Purpose and Scope of Services: The purpose of our geotechnical investigation was to evaluate the site's subsurface and ground water conditions. Our scope of services includes the following: 1) Drilling and sampling of one boring to depth of 25 -ft . 2) Evaluation of the in-place conditions of the subsurface soils through Standard Penetration tests 3) Observation of the ground water conditions during field exploration operations; 4) Perform laboratory tests such as Atterberg limits, gradations and moisture content tests; 5) Review and evaluation of the field and laboratory test programs during their execution with modifications of these programs, when necessary, to adjust to subsurface conditions revealed by them; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING❖QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS-.'- ENVIRONMENTAL SIU -ANALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC Page 2 of 13 6) Consultations with Prime Professional and members of the design team on findings and recommendations; and preparation of a written geotechnical engineering report for use by the members of the design team in their preparation of design and construction documents. The Scope of Services did not include any environmental assessment for the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic materials in the soil, surface water, groundwater, or air, on or below or around this site. Any statements in this report or on the boring logs regarding odors, colors or unusual or suspicious items or conditions are strictly for the information of the client. 4.0 Site Conditions: The project site was located to the west of existing residence. The project site was gradually sloping towards the north, with an approximate elevation difference of approximately 2 -ft from the center of the lot. 5.0 Geotechnical Investigation: Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling one boring to depth of 25 -ft, from the existing grade at the locations indicated on the Site Map. The borings were advanced using a 4 -inch diameter continuous flight auger powered by a CME -45 drilling rig. Samples were taken at selected intervals using a Standard split spoon and a California ring sampler, which was driven into the soil by dropping a 140 -pound hammer through a free fall of 30 inches. The number of blows required to drive the sampler into the soil is known as a penetration test. The number of blows required for the sampler to penetrate 12 inches is evaluated and gives an indication of the consistency or relative density of the soils and bedrock encountered. The results of the penetration test and log of materials encountered are presented in the Logs of Exploratory Boring. Samples were returned to the laboratory where they were visually classified and testing was assigned to evaluate the engineering pydiperties o he soil GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING -.-° TESTING AND INSPECTIONS -'.-ENVIRONMENTAL I Triax Engineering, LLC Page 3 of 13 layers. Laboratory testing consisted of moisture and density determinations, and gradation tests. The results of the laboratory testing are also presented in this report. The results of the penetration test and log of materials encountered are presented in the Logs of Exploratory Borings. Samples were returned to the laboratory where they were visually classified and testing was assigned to evaluate the engineering properties of the soil layers. Laboratory testing consisted of moisture and density determinations, and gradation tests. The results of the laboratory testing are also presented in this report. Table 1 Summary of Field Exploration Boring No. Depth (ft) B-1 25 -ft 6.0 General Subsurface Conditions: The subsurface conditions may generally be grouped into four generalized strata with similar physical and engineering properties as per the boring logs provided at the end of this report. Brown silty sand, and clayey sands were encountered up to depths of 15 -ft. Very stiff sandy clays were encountered below a depth of 15 -ft. Bedrock was not encountered within the depths of our exploratory boring. Table 2 Subsurface Stratigraphy Material Description A roximate Depth ft Consistency Brown Silty Sand 0-7 Very Stiff Brown Clayey Sand 7-14 Very Stiff to Hard Brown Sandy Clay 14-25 Very Stiff Brown Silty Sand 25 Medium Dense GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING•:•QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS --.-ENVIRONMENTAL SIU"ANALYSES I Triax Engineering, LLC Page 4 of 13 7.0 Groundwater Conditions: Ground water seepage was not encountered in our boring during the time of our field exploration. However, ground water levels will fluctuate with seasonal climatic variations and changes in land use. It is not unusual to encounter shallow ground water during snow melt or during or after periods of precipitation. The surface water tends to percolate down until it encounters a relatively impervious layer. Table 3 Groundwater Conditions Boring No. Date of Measurement Depth from Existing grade it) B-1 8/25/17 N/a Accurate determination of the groundwater elevation may not be possible even after several' days of observation. Seasonal variation, temperature, recent precipitation and localized construction activities that influence drainage characteristics may influence the groundwater table and volumes of water will depend on the permeability of soils. Groundwater conditions can differ between borehole locations and in areas not explored. 8.0 Design Engineering Analysis: The recommendations presented below are based on the data obtained from our field and laboratory tests, our past experience with geotechnical conditions similar to those at this site, and our engineering design analysis. Based on the soils encountered at the project site, shallow spread footings can be utilized in conjunction with soil modification outlined below to support the proposed structure, only if the owner understands the risk and can tolerate some movement. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING❖QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS -'.-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE A` A�VSES Triax Engineering, LLC Page 5 of 13 8.1 Shallow Spread Footings: The proposed single family residence at the subject property can be supported by Shallow spread -type footings founded on undisturbed in-situ soils, bearing at minimum depth of 3 -feet below the lowest finished grade. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,750 pounds per square foot (PSF) is recommended for the design of shallow spread -type footings bearing undisturbed in-situ soils. Table 4 Allowable Bearing Capacities Bearing Depth Type of foundation Allowable Bearing Capacity s 3 -ft below existing grade Shallow spread footings founded on 1,750 psf undisturbed in-situ soils In order to minimize the sensitivity of the structure to differential movement, the footings and walls should be reinforced to allow for a degree of load re -distribution should a localized zone of the supporting soils become saturated. Stem walls should either be positively separated from the floor slabs or reinforced to prevent cracking at the slab stem wall interface. Significant moisture increase in the in-situ soils could create additional and/or excessive movements in some areas of the site. Accordingly, the site drainage and moisture protection provisions, recommended in this report are critical design considerations. Prior to placing concrete, all bearing surfaces must be cleared of all loose material. Disturbed material may only be re -compacted with guidance from, and after contacting this office. To verify the soil conditions and soil bearing capacity, it is required that an open hole observation be performed. The entire excavation must be dug down to final grade prior to the observation. If potentially GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING•:-QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS-.'- ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC Page 6 of 13 expansive clay, deleterious material, or other unsuitable conditions are found, additional over -excavation of some or the entire site may be required — replacing inadequate soils with acceptable materials. Revised foundation recommendations — such as the use of drilled piers — may also be required. Please call to schedule this inspection. Ensure that the requirements contained herein are reflected in any construction plans developed for this site. In order to minimize the chances of water damage to the structure(s), an exterior perimeter drain is recommended for structures built on this site. This drain may flow into a sump pit fitted with a pump, or may flow to a suitable `daylight' outside of the structure. 9.0 Slab on grade Construction: The risk of Slab Performance at this site is judged to be moderate under current moisture conditions. However, it must be understood, that changes in the water content of these soils may cause the soil to swell or shrink, which may cause movement or cracking of slabs. Table 5 Slab Performance Risk Building Slab Performance Risk Single Family Residence low 11 However, if some movement of a slab is not acceptable, the proposed structure should be constructed utilizing a structural floor system, rather than a slab. Potential vertical movements on the order of 1 '/2 inches can be anticipated at this project site due to moisture variation at the project site. 01 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING °QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS --.-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC Page 7 of 13 Should the owner elect to accept the risks of expansive / consolidating soils and the effects they may have on slabs, the following measures have been shown to be helpful when constructing slabs. The following information however, must not be construed as an approval to construct slabs—on—grade. Slabs should bear on proof -rolled and re -compacted materials. A proof -roll of the subgrade shall be observed by the geotechnical engineer's representative. They must not bear on gravel or other materials which may allow the migration of water below the slabs. If the on-site soils are not acceptable, it is preferable to bear slabs on non -expansive imported materials. This will minimize the transfer and retention of water below the slab. Materials with a Liquid Limit below 30 and a Plasticity Index between 10 and 15 are preferred. Slabs shall be isolated from foundation components by slip joints constructed to allow the independent movement of the slab. Slabs shall also be separated from any utility components by isolation joints. Mechanical equipment resting on slabs must be fitted with expandable / collapsible sections in order to allow movement of the slab without damage to the equipment or to the structure. Non-bearing partition walls must be constructed with a minimum of one inch of float to allow for movement of the slab without damaging any part of the structure. All doors shall be constructed with at least a Iinch gap at floor level. It is the owner's responsibility to monitor and maintain all floats and gaps as necessary. If additional information on float is needed, please contact this office. A properly engineered and constructed vapor barrier should be provided beneath slabs -on -grade that will be carpeted or receive moisture sensitive coverings or adhesives. Slabs must be appropriately reinforced to resist the anticipated loads as well as the effects of the supporting soils. Floor slabs must also be scored in accordance with the American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommendations in order to control cracking of the slab due to shrinkage or other factors. These scores should be a maximum of 12 feet apart.�tl GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ❖QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS-'.- ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC Page 8 of 13 10.0 Post Construction Vertical Movement: Total movement resulting from the provided structural loads is estimated to be on the order of about 1 inch. Differential movement should be on the order of '/2 to 3/4 of the estimated total movement. Additional foundation movements could occur if water from any source infiltrates the foundation soils; therefore, proper drainage should be provided in the final design and during construction and throughout the life of the structure. An exterior foundation perimeter drain is recommended below foundation elevations. 11.0 Lateral Loads: The ultimate passive soil resistance against edges of footings, grade beams, etc., with properly compacted (non -expansive) backfill, should be considered as being equal to forces exerted by a fluid of 45 pounds per cubic foot (PCF) unit weight. Below grade walls must be designed for lateral loads. For "active" conditions, the walls should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 45 PCF for properly compacted backfill. For "at rest" conditions, equivalent fluid pressures of 60 PCF should be used. For "passive" conditions, equivalent fluid pressures of 295 PCF (without factor of safety) should be used. These loads do not include swelling pressures, hydrostatic loads or surcharge loads, such as sloping backfill or vehicles. Table 6 Equivalent fluid pressures Equivalent Fluid Pressure Sandy Clays (On-site materials) Structural backfill (Properly Com acted Active 45 pcf 45 pcf Passive 275 pef without factor of safety) 255 pcf At rest 60 pcf 60 pef GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-:-QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS --.-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES I Triax Engineering, LLC Page 9 of 13 The above values are for properly compacted backfill. These values are not valid for submerged conditions. Onsite clays present at the site are expansive and will exert excessive pressures on walls. Therefore onsite clays are not recommended for structural fill or as backfill. 12.0 Drainage: An exterior foundation perimeter drain is recommended in order to protect the structure from water damage. Foundation wall must be braced or be supported by first floor framing prior to backfilling the foundation. The risk for wetting of foundation soils can be reduced by carefully planned and maintained surface drainage. The following precautions should be observed during construction and be maintained at all times after the structure is completed. Excessive wetting or drying of open foundation excavations should be avoided as much as possible during construction. Backfill adjacent to foundation walls should be moistened and compacted. Any settlement of backfill after completion of the structure should be repaired and positive drainage reestablished. The ground surface surrounding the structures should be sloped to drain away from the structures in all directions. A minimum slope of 12 inches in the first 10 feet should be achieved and maintained after construction. Roof downspouts and drains for the structures should discharge to the surface well beyond the limits of all backfill. Irrigated landscaping should not be placed within 5 to 10 feet of the foundation walls. Plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding the structures. These membranes trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabnaritableoption to control weed growth and allow some evaporation. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS -'.-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC l Page 10 of 13 In order to minimize the chances of water damage to the structures, an exterior perimeter drain is recommended for any structures built on this site. This drain may flow into a sump pit fitted with a pump, or may flow to a suitable `daylight' outside of these structures. 13.0 Site Preparation: Organic material, manmade fill, and any debris or deleterious materials should be removed from the foundation area and wasted off site or used for non-structural purposes. Structural fill material must be placed in 8 inches loose layers and compacted to 6 -inch lifts, and compacted to 95 percent of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density within 2 percent of the optimum moisture content. Structures supported by insufficiently compacted structural fill may settle. Any fill utilized for non- structural purposes — such as landscape backfill — must be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D 698. In hot, windy or dry weather, the site should be periodically wetted with a water spray if needed to maintain its moisture content and not dry out excessively. 14.0 Structural Fill and Compaction Requirements: Any select structural fill used at the site should have a Liquid Limit less than 30 and a Plasticity Index between 5 and 15. The fill should contain no particles greater than 3 inches in diameter. The percent passing U.S. Standard Sieve No. 4 should be between 40 and 80 percent and passing Sieve No. 40 between 10 and 50 percent. The percent passing Sieve No. 200 should be less than 50 percent. The fill materials shall be placed in loose lifts not to exceed 8 inches and compacted to as outlined in the following table. Onsite soils at this project site cannot be used as structural fill. N- �� e 0*' GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING❖QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS -'.-'ENVIRONMENTAL I Triax Engineering, LLC I Page 11 of 13 If the existing grade has to be raised to attain the finish grade elevation, select fill should be placed, compacted and tested for compaction compliance by Triax Engineering, LLC. Table 7 Compaction Specifications Soil Type Dry Density Moisture Content Structural Fill (non expansive select fill) Min. 95% (ASTM D 698) -2 to +2% of OMC Onsite soils Min. 95% (ASTM D 698) -2 to +2% of OMC Class 6 ABC Min. 95% (ASTM D 698) -2 to +2% of OMC 15.0 Excavations and Shoring: Excavations should not remain open for extended periods of time, permitting wetting or drying of the bearing materials. Moisture changes of the bearing materials may increase the risk for movement. Care should be taken when working near the sides of excavations at all times, and the slopes should be monitored by onsite personnel during construction for evidence of sloughing, bulging or toppling of the sidewalls or cracking at the ground surface. Surcharge loading at the top of the cut by equipment, materials, or vehicles must be avoided, since surcharge loading will increase the risk of caving. Spoils of the excavation must be placed a minimum of 5 horizontal feet from the edge of the excavation. Final evaluation of excavations, excavation slopes and soil and bedrock materials exposed in excavations should be done during construction by the contractors "competent person" as required by OSHA guidelines. Due to the soil types present, shoring or stabilization of the excavation may be necessary at this site. An open -hole observation should be performed if required by the local municipality or if there are any concerns regarding excavation safety or stability. If the proposed excavation is within 10' of any existing structure, or if potential property damage or safety is an issue, some form of shoring may be required. fl{ t;M Wo't�Zi §o rim - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING-'.- QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS-'.- ENVIRONMENTAL SITE { Triax Engineering, LLC 1 Page 12 of 13 16.0 Limitations: In any subsurface investigation, limited data is available from which to formulate soil descriptions and generate recommendations for foundations and related construction components. The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings performed at the indicated locations. The report does not reflect variations that may occur between borings across the site. The samples taken are indicative of the subsurface materials at the time and at the location the samples were taken. Precipitation, seasonal changes, and excavating are just a few of the factors, which may create changes in the composition of the site. If variations then appear evident, it will be necessary to re-evaluate our recommendations after performing on-site observations and tests to establish the engineering significance of any variations. This report does not address nor was intended to address any environmental issues, hazardous materials or toxic waste issues, or other subsurface situations or conditions other than those described within this report. The project geotechnical engineer declares that the findings, recommendations and/or professional advice contained herein have been made and this report prepared in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practice in the fields of geotechnical engineering and engineering geology. No other warranties are implied or expressed. This report is valid until site conditions change due to disturbance (cut and fill grading) or changes to nearby drainage conditions, or for 3 years from the date of this report, whichever occurs first. Beyond this validation date, Triax shall not accept any liability associated with the engineering recommendations in the report, particularly if the site conditions have changed. If this report is desired for use for design purposes beyond this validation date, we highly recommend drilling additional borings so that we can verify the subsurface conditions and validate the recommendations in this report." �,�� 01 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING 4.'-QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS-.'- ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC Page 13 of 13 This report is intended for the sole use of Mr. Mike Glavan and approved agents during the construction of the above mentioned project site. This office cannot be responsible for any conclusions or recommendations made by other parties based upon the data contained herein. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING -:•QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS-'.- ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES >-, 00 Cd to I I 0 Z (AVM-JO-IHOIH Os)_ MVEIZin J'afloo - ow C. a. w < z 0 a. Wri Bz ozo mmm. O 'oo .i Wom >-, 00 Cd to I I Log of Boring:B-'I ELEVATION AND Dong: Lat: Long: Elev:ft. E N G I N E E R I N G DATE STARTED: DATE FINISHED: 08/25/17 08125/17 TOTAL DEPTH (ft.): GROUND WATER (ft): During Drilling: After 48 Hrs: 25 ADDRESS: 12550.W 38th Avenue Project Name: Single Family Residence Wheat Ride CO 80033 Location: Proposed Residence BY: HAMMER WEIGHT: 140 lbsLOGGED DROP: 30 Inches Sardar Khudhur =Y SAMPLES LABORATORY TESTS o E m ° 3 ° o 6 - 3 �� �a E v x o m n Moisture Content o 0 0 Lu ° MATERIAL DESCRIPTION ❑ co o mLL tiGa 0 a �E x W N M � a c o j Aggregate / Gravel Bed •'• Brown Silty Sand j Bu — Very Stiff 4.5 21.4% NP NP SM CA 22 i 5 3.0 i Ss 28 25 8.1 0.7 CA Brown Clayey Sand "Al Very Stiff to Hard 10— 10 }f}}} -- -- 8.0 319% ! 32 14 SC.. f/ SS 31 /}fJJ f / Brown Sandy Clay 15 }• —Very Stiff ts.s 0.1 SS 27 20 , ......—._... 25.8 ; CA 20 1 25 a.8 BrICAediumiDense nd SS 24 — End of Borehole — 30- 035Soil 35— SoilStratigraphic boundaries represent approximate boundary lines between 40 different soil / rock types. Actual tran-si-fion-mav be aradual. yy i�! i3f 2Ct No.: D17G146 Triax Engineering, LLC 12445 E 39th Avenue Suite 317 Denver CO 80239 Plate: 2 1720.230931 PAY 790 9aiP infono triax0eo.com TRIA E N G I N E E R I N G Client: Project: Mr. Mike Glavan Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Project #: D17G146 3oring;Depth ; MC LL ; PI % NIDD ; % USCS;AASHTO; UCS pH Su ; Resistivity, N (ft) ; (%) ; (%);(%); Fines; (pcf) ; Swell ; Class.; Class. (tsf) ohm.cm i i _r-____ r___ -____I___ ________ ______y_ -_____r__ -___ i _________-_____�_____�___-______� 1 I 1 1 1 1 -------------- i - ' ' �' -------- -- _ _ _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ------- I --____-__ ------ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - r i 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � • 1 , 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 1 ;E-1 ; 3 14.5 ; NP; NP ; 21.4% ; ; :SM ; A-2-4(0) ----------- _ - - - - - - �- - - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 - - - - - - -1--------- 4 ------ - - - - - - - N _ _ _ _ _ F ---------- :B-1 --------r;8-1 : 5 ;3 - - ' - - -1- - - - - - - - - - - - - l - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - � - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - r 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 i ;B-1 ; 7 ;8.1 ; ; ; ; 121.3 ; 0.7% ; ; 7.2 4 - - - - - - l - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - N _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ; I- - - - - - - - - - r 1 1 1 1 1 1 B-1 ; 10 ;8 ; 32 ; 14 ; 33.9% ; ; ;SC ; A-2-6(1) 1_ _ _ _ _ _ J _ _ _ _ _ y _ - ' - ~ ' - - y - -1- ' ' ' _ _ _ _I- ' - - _ _ _ 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _I_ _ _ _ _ _ - ' 'a - ' ' _ _ _ H _ _ _ _ _ _ _ F• _ _ _ _ _ H - - - - - - - - - r 1 1 1 1 I ;B-1 ; 15 16.8 ; ; ; ; 97.2 ; 0.1% ; ; 1.7 -- - - - - - L - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - ..1 - - - - - _ F _ _ _ _ - _ _ H - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 B-1 ; 20 125.8 ; ; 1 - - - L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _1_ _ _ _ _ _ _ L _ _ _ _ _ _ 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _I- - - - - - - - � - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - /" - - - - - - - - - r 1 1 ;B-1 :25 14.8 ; ; ; ; ; -------------------------- 1--------- I - - - - - - 4 - - - - - - - 1- - - - - - F - - - - - - - - - r MC= Moisture Content(%) LL= Liquid Limit (%) P1= Plasticity Index (%) pH = pH (distilled water)/pH (cacl2) LICS = Unconfined Compressive Strength Su= water soluble sulfates, % by dry wt. Triax Engineering, LLC '12445 E 39th Avenue Unit 517 Denver CO 80239 PH: 720.230.1931 FAX: 720.230.5471 EMAIL: info@triaxgeo.com Client: Mr. Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue FRIA E N G IN E E R i NG)k Project: Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Project #: D17G146 Boring : B-1 Lab ID #: 17-1026 Depth: 3 ft Sieve Analysis 100 90 80 70 60 q 50 c Q, m 40 D_ 30 20 10 M 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 Diameter of Particles in mm Silt or Clay Sand IGrave! Cobbles % Fines Fine I Medium JCoarse Fine Coarse I Description: I Brown Silty Sand i % Gravel 0.3% % Sand 78.3% % Fines 21.4% Atterberg Limits LL NP PI NP Classification AASHTO A-2-4(0) USCS SM City of f I nax Engineering, LLC i 'Wheat t ic# e 12445 E 39th Avenue Unit 517 Denver CO 80239 PH: 720.230.1931 FAX: 720.230.5471 EMAIL: info@triageodrti'�cn, Client: Mr. Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue E N G I N E E R I N Project: Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Project D17G146 ohinq #: B-1 Lab ID #: 17-1028 Depth: 7 ft Swell / Consolidation 4 3 z 2 -3 -4 L- 0.1 I Description: I Brown Clayey Sand 1.0 10.0 Applied Pressure (kso 100.0 NDD (pcf) % Moisture % Fines % Swell Swelling due to wetting under constant pressure Dry Wet 8.1 0.7 121.3 131.1 LL P1 Y" Triax Engineering, LLC 12445 E 39th Avenue Unit 517 Denver CO 80239 PH: 720.230.1931 FAX: 720.230-5471 EMAIL: info@tri'axgeo.com Client: Mr. Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue E N G I N E E R I N G Project: Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Project #: D17G146 Boring #: B-1 Lab ID #: 17-1028 Depth: 7 ft liEN011C 4- cL 12000- tn - 10000- U) rrL�� 8000- - ' �} - 6000 - E 0 4000- 0 2000- .......... 0 L 0.0 0.5 1.1 1 Description: J Brown Clayey Sand psf W 2.1 2.7 3.2 Axial Strain(%) tsf. psi Unconfined Compressive Strength 14319 7.2 99.4 Undrained Shear 7160 3.6 49.7 Strength Strain at Failure 4.3% StrainRate 1.0%/Min _ _. ----------- "�� ' � -14000 -12000 -10000 -8000 - 6000 - 4000 3.7 4.3 Wet Density Dry Density Moisture Content(%) Wt of Specimen Length/Diameter Average Specimen Diameter Average Specimen Height -2000 -0 5.3 122.2 pcf 113.0 pcf 8.1 349.1 9 2.0 1.9 in. 3.8 in. Triax Engineering, LLC 12445 E 39th Avenue Unit 517 Denver CO 80239 PH: 720.230.1931 FAX: 720.230.5471 EMAIL: info@triaxdeo.com Client: Mr. Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue Project: Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Project : D17G146 Boring : B-1 Lab ID : 17-1029 Depth: 10 ft Sieve Analysis 100 90 80 De 70 60 c� CL 50 m 40 30 20 10 0 ------ -- --- LUE 0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 Diameter of Particles in mm Silt or clay Sand Gravel Cobbles % Fines Fine Medium Icoarse Fine Coarse I Description: I Brown Clayey Sand I % Gravel 4.9% % Sand 61.2% % Fines 33.9% tter erg Limits LL 32 PI 14 Classification 1 AASHTO A-2-6(1) LISCS Sc Triax Engineering, LLC 12445 E 39th Avenue Unit 517 Denver CO 80239 PH: 720.230.1931 FAX: 720.230.5471 EMAIL: info@triaxgeo.com Client: lient: Mr. Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue EN GIN EERING ?J Project: Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Project #: D17G146 113oring #: B-1 Lab ID #: 17-1030 Depth: 15 ft Swell I Consolidation 4 3 Z__ 2 -3 -4 L- 0.1 1.0 10.0 Applied Pressure (ksf) IDescription: I Brown Sandy Clay I ND (pcf) % Moisture % Fines % Swell Swelling due to wetting under constant pressure Dry Wet 16.8 0.1 97.2 113.6 LL P1 Triax Engineering, LLC 12445 E 39th Avenue Unit 517 Denver CO 80239 PH: 720.230.1931 FAX: 720.230.5471 EMAIL: info@triaxgeo.com Client: Mr. Mike Glavan 12550 W 38th Avenue Project: Single Family Residence 12550 W 38th Avenue Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Project #: D17G146 Boring #: B-1 Lab ID #: 17-1030 Depth: 15 ft 4000- 3600- 3200- U) 000-3600-3200- - 2800- 2400— U) 800 - 2400— U) - N 2000- 1600 000- 1600 1200 0 U 800 400 0 0.0 0.5 1.1 1.6 2.2 2.7 3.3 3.8 Axial Strain(%) Description: ' Brown Sandy Clay psf. tsf. psi Unconfined Compressive 115.8 Dry Density 99.2 Strength 3486 1.7 24.2 Undrained Shear 1743 0.9 12.1 Strength 3.7 Strain at Failure 4.4% StrainRate 1.1 %/Min 4.4 4.9 5.4 6.0 Wet Density 115.8 Dry Density 99.2 Moisture Content(%) 16.8 Wt of Specimen 322.8 Length/Diameter 1.9 Average Specimen Diameter 1.9 Average Specimen Height 3.7 -4000 -3600 +3200 -2800 -2400 -2000 -1600 -1200 -800 -400 -0 6.5 pcf pcf N iriax Engineering, LLC 12445 E 39th Avenue Unit 517 Denver CO 80239 PH: 720.230.1931 FAX: 720.230.5471 EMAIL: info@triaxgeo.com <z GENERAL NOTES Consistency of Fine — Grained Soils Unconfined Compressive Strength, Qu, sf Standard Penetration Blow Counts(N-Value) Consistency <500 0-1 Very Soft 500-1000 2-4 Soft 1000-2000 4-8 Medium Stiff 2000-4000 8-15 Stiff 4000-8000 15-30 Very Stiff 8000+ >30 Hard Relative Density of Coarse Grained Soils Grain Size Terminoloav Standard Penetration Blow Counts N -Value Consistency 0-3 Very Loose 4-9 Loose 10-29 Medium Dense 30-49 Dense >50 Very Dense Plasticity Description Term PI Range Non Plastic 0 Low Plasticity 1-10 Medium Plasticity 11-30 High Plasticity >30 Terminology Nominal Particle Size Boulders Over 12 inch (300mm) Cobbles 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm) Gravel 3 in. to #4 Sieve (75mm to 4.75mm) Sand #4 to #200 Sieve (4.75 mm to 0.075 mm) Silt/ClayPassing #200 Sieve (<0.075mm) Slab Performance Risk Slab Performance Risk Category Representative % Swell 500 Psf Surcharge) Representative % Swell 1000 Psf Surcharge) Low 0 to <3 0 to <2 Moderate 3 to <5 2 to <4 High 5 to <8 4 to <6 Very High >_8 >_6 The data collected by Triax Engineering, LLC during this investigation was used to provide geotechnical information and recommendations regarding subsurface conditions on the site investigated, the effect of those conditions on the proposed construction, and the foundation type for the named client. The stratification lines indicated on the boring log are approximate, and subsurface conditions encountered during construction may differ from those presented herein. This uncertainty cannot be eliminated because of the many variability's associated with geology. For example material and engineering characteristics of soil and bedrock may change more gradually or more quickly indicated in this report and the actual engineering properties of non -sampled soil or rock may differ from interpretations. Quantitative conclusions regarding the performance of geotechnical structures prior to construction are not possible because of the complexity of subsurface conditions. Rather, engineering judgments and experience are used to estimate likely geotechnical performance and provide the necessary recommendations. Put another way, we cannot be sure about what is not visible, so the collected data and our training and experience are used to develop predictions and recommendations. There are no guarantees or warranties implied or expressed. The owner and/or client must understand that uncertainties are associated with geotechnical engineering, and they, the owner and/or client, must determine the level of risk they are willing to accept for the proposed construction. The risks can be reduced, but not eliminated, through more detailed investigation, which costs more money and takes more time, and through any appropriate construction, which might be recommended as a result of that, more detailed investigation. To reduce the level of uncertainty, this report was prepared only for the referenced client and for the proposed construction indicated in the report. Unless authorized by us in writing, the owner will assume additional geotechnical risk if this report is used for any construction that differs from that indicated in the report. Our firm should be consulted well before changes in the proposed construction occur, such as the nature, size, configuration, orientation, or location of any improvements. Additionally, the knowledge and experience of the local geotechnical practice is continually expanding and it must be understood the presented recommendations were made according to the standard of practice at the time of report issuance. If the construction occurs 1 or more years after issuance of the report, the owner and/or client should contact our firm to determine if additional investigation or revised recommendations world be advisable. r— Geotechnical -Engineering Report —) The Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA) has prepared this advisory to help you - assumedly a client representative - interpret and apply this geotechnical -engineering report as effectively as possible. In that way, clients can benefit from a lowered exposure to the subsurface problems that, for decades, have been a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. If you have questions or want more information about any of the issues discussed below, contact your GBA-member geotechnical engineer. Active involvement in the Geoprofessional Business Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk -confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Geotechnical -Engineering Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and Projects Geotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical -engineering study conducted for a given civil engineer will not likely meet the needs of a civil - works constructor or even a different civil engineer. Because each geotechnical -engineering study is unique, each geotechnical - engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. Those who rely on a geotechnical -engineering report prepared for a different client can be seriously misled. No one except authorized client representatives should rely on this geotechnical -engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one - not even you - should apply this report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read this Report in Full Costly problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical - engineering report did not read it in its entirety. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. Read this report in full. You Need to Inform Your Geotechnical Engineer about Change Your geotechnical engineer considered unique, project -specific factors when designing the study behind this report and developing the confirmation -dependent recommendations the report conveys. A few typical factors include: • the client's goals, objectives, budget, schedule, and risk -management preferences; • the general nature of the structure involved, its size, configuration, and performance criteria; • the structure's location and orientation on the site; and • other planned or existing site improvements, such as retaining walls, access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Typical changes that could erode the reliability of this report include those that affect: • the site's size or shape; • the function of the proposed structure, as when it's changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light -industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse; • the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure; • the composition of the design team; or • project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes - even minor ones - and request an assessment of their impact. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that arise because the geotechnical engineer was not informed about developments the engineer otherwise _ would have considered. This Report May Not Be Reliable Do not rely on this report if your geotechnical engineer prepared it: • for a different client; • for a different project; • for a different site (that may or may not include all or a portion of the original site); or • before important events occurred at the site or adjacent to it; e.g., man-made events like construction or environmental remediation, or natural events like floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Note, too, that it could be unwise to rely on a geotechnical -engineering report whose reliability may have been affected by the passage of time, because of factors like changed subsurface conditions; new or modified codes, standards, or regulations; or new techniques or tools. If your geotechnical engineer has not indicated an `apply -by" date on the report, ask what it should be, and, in general, if you are the least bit uncertain about the continued reliability of this report, contact your geotechnical engineer before applying it. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis - if any is required at all - could prevent major problems. Most of the "Findings" Related in This Report Are Professional Opinions Before construction begins, geotechnical engineers explore a site's subsurface through various sampling and testing procedures. Geotechnical engineers can observe actual subsurface conditions only at those specific locations where sampling and testing were performed. The data derived from that sampling and testing were reviewed by your geotechnical engineer, who then applied professional judgment '10111 form opinions about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual sitewide-subsurface conditions may differ - maybe significantly - from those indicated in this report. Confront that risk by retaining your geotechnical engineer to serve on the design team from project start to project finish, so the individual can provide inforined guidance quicEl}, whenever needed. This Report's Recommendations Are Confirmation -Dependent The recommendations included in this report - including any options or alternatives - are confirmation -dependent. In other words, they are not final, because the geotechnical engineer who developed them relied heavily on judgment and opinion to do so. Your geotechnical engineer can finalize the recommendations only after observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. If through observation your geotechnical engineer confirms that the conditions assumed to exist actually do exist, the recommendations can be relied upon, assuming no other changes have occurred. The geotechnical engineer who prepared this report cannot assume responsibility or liability for confirmation - dependent recommendations if you fail to retain that engineer to perform construction observation. This Report Could Be Misinterpreted Other design professionals' misinterpretation of geotechnical - engineering reports has resulted in costly problems. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer serve as a full-time member -of the design team, to: • confer with other design -team members, • help develop specifications, • review pertinent elements of other design professionals' plans and specifications, and • be on hand quickly whenever geotechnical -engineering guidance is needed. You should also confront the risk of constructors misinterpreting this report. Do so by retaining your geotechnical engineer to participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences and to perform construction observation. Give Constructors a Complete Report and Guidance Some owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can shift unanticipated -subsurface -conditions liability to constructors by limiting the information they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent the costly, contentious problems this practice has caused, include the complete geotechnical -engineering report, along with any attachments or appendices, with your contract documents, but be certain to note conspicuously that you've included the material for informational purposes only. To avoid misunderstanding, you may also want to note that "informational purposes" means constructors have no right to rely on the interpretations, opinions, conclusions, or recommendations in the report, but they may rely on the factual data relative to the specific times, locations, and depths/elevations referenced. Be certain that constructors know they may learn about specific project requirements, including options selected from the report, only from the design drawings and specifications. Remind constructors that they may perform their own studies if they want to, and be sure to allow enough time to permit them to do so. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Conducting prebid and preconstruction conferences can also be valuable in this respect. Read Responsibility Provisions Closely Some client representatives, design professionals, and constructors do not realize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. That lack of understanding has nurtured unrealistic expectations that have resulted in disappointments, delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. To confront that risk, geotechnical engineers commonly include explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled "limitations," many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Geoenvironmental Concerns Are Not Covered the personnel, equipment, and techniques used to perform an environmental study - e.g., a "phase -one" or "phase -two" environmental site assessment - differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical -engineering study. For that reason, a geotechnical - engineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated subsurface environmental problems have led to project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own environmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk -management guidance. As a general rule, do not rely on an environmental report prepared for a different client, site, or project, or that is more than six months old. Obtain Professional Assistance to Deal with Moisture Infiltration and Mold While your geotechnical engineer may have addressed groundwater, water infiltration, or similar issues in this report, none of the engineer's services were designed, conducted, or intended to prevent uncontrolled migration of moisture - including water vapor - from the soil through building slabs and walls and into the building interior, where it can cause mold growth and material -performance deficiencies. Accordingly; proper implementation of the geotechnical engineer's recommendations will not of itself be sufficient to prevent moisture infiltration. Confront the risk of moisture infiltration by including building -envelope or mold specialists on the design team. Geotechnical engineers are not building - envelope or mold specialists. GEOPROFESSIONAL BUSINESS GAFA ASSOCIATION Telephone: 301/565-2733 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org wwwgeoprofessional.org Copyright 2016 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA), Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is stricth prohibited, except with GB.Ns specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes- of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document or its wording as a complement to or as an ele ent of a report of any kind. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be committing negligent i, - MAJOR DIVISIONS GROUP SYMBOLS DESCRIPTIONS Well -Graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand Mixtures, N 0 U) > 2 -C LL GW Little or no Fines L) M W > (D (D > U- a) 6�5 C: ......... -: ". Poorly -Graded Gravels, Gravel -Sand Mixtures, ( n ID GP CD w 0 6 U :t-- Little or no Fines CD > (3 0 z U) GM Silty Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Silt Mixtures 0 t0 c LU LL (5 < z > a. GC Clayey Gravels, Gravel -Sand -Clay Mixtures W z LU 2 (D 0 SW ........ Well -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, u� Cc . U) Little or no Fines 0 .2! SP Poorly -Graded Sands, Gravelly Sands, 0 0 0 Z Little or no Fines Z SM Silty Sands, Sand -Silt Mixtures 0 M Cr LU LL LL CU -i __j < ME 0 M 0 CL E SC Clayey Sands, Sand -Clay Mixtures 0 Lncn ¢ < Inorganic Silts & Very Fine Sands, Rock Flour, U) j ML Silty or Clayey Fine Sands or Clayey Silts with -j 0 < �E 6 06 0) cn >- i:j I_- 1-- CD Slight Plasticty (n U) N Z (n LO U) Inorganic Clays of Low to Medium Plasticity, > CL Gravelly Clays, Sandy Clays, Silty Clays, w Q) Lean Clays <Inorganic CD MH Silts, Micaceous or Diatomaceous mo 1: C\j 06 Cn Fine Sand or Silty Soils, Elastic Silts 6 < HQ -j CD LO z u. C: Fn CH Inorganic Clays of High Plasticity, Fat Clays SANDSTONE SILTSTONE U) Z 0 —i < CLAYSTONE 0 < SHALE ILL IGNEOUS BEDROCK METAMORPHIC BEDROCK V Indicates Final Observed Groundwater Level GROUNDWATER Indicates Initial Observed Groundwater Location Triax Engineering, LLC EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page EX -1 The soil conditions at the site of the proposed single family residence located at 12550 W 38th Avenue in Wheat ridge, CO, was explored by drilling one boring to a depth of 25 -ft . Laboratory tests were performed on selected specimens to evaluate the engineering characteristics of various soil strata encountered in our borings. This report presents a description of subsurface conditions encountered at the site, recommended foundation systems, and design and construction criteria influenced by the subsurface conditions. It is based on data obtained from field investigations, laboratory test results and our previous experience. A summary of our findings and recommendations is presented below: This executive summary must be used in conjunction with the entire report. Please note that this section provides a broad overview and will not include specific details for each item. Therefore, the report must be read in its entirety to achieve a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. • The subsurface conditions may generally be grouped into four generalized strata with similar physical and engineering properties. For detailed descriptions, the boring logs provided at the end of this report. • Ground water seepage was not encountered in our boring during the time of our field exploration. However, ground water levels will fluctuate with seasonal climatic variations and changes in the land use. • The proposed single family residence at the subject property can be supported by Shallow spread -type footings founded on undisturbed in-situ soils, bearing at minimum depth of 3 -feet below the lowest finished grade. An allowable soil bearing pressure of 1,750 pounds per square foot (PSF) is recommended for the design of shallow spread -type footings bearing on undisturbed in-situ soils. • There is a low risk of slab movement at the proposed slab elevations when the slab is supported by the near -surface soils under current moisture conditions. Potential vertical movements on the order of 1 1/2 inches can be anticipated at this project site due to moisture variation at the project site. rg� GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •:• QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS -'.-ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ANALYSES Triax Engineering, LLC Table EX -1 Recommended Foundation Systems Page EX -2 Bearing Depth Type of Foundation Allowable BearingCapacity sf) 3 -ft below existing grade Shallow spread footings founded on 1,750 psf undisturbed in-situ soils • In order to minimize the chance for moisture infiltration into the foundation soils and limit the potential for movement of the foundations and/or slabs, positive drainage down and away from all fourtdation walls and the structure should be established and maintained at all times. • An exterior foundation perimeter drain is recommended below foundation elevations. • Detailed descriptions of subsurface conditions, engineering analysis, and design recommendations are included in this report. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING •:-QA/QC TESTING AND INSPECTIONS•;•ENVIRONMENTAL SITE Existing ROW 5' minimum transition from new driveway to match existing driveway. 5' min. ADA -compliant transition zone from reverse sidewalk chase to driveway. :grade area as needed allow flow to north r historical conditions 5' stones (measured from BOW) IM_ ll =-5.0' either side of reverse SW chase 5.0' S, r 5.0' ..12' 1 max. y t per A_ UA Install new modified drivecut (CDOT M-609-1 Type 3) to 3557 Urban Ct. per detail between curb chase and new stone to west. Construct 5' wide sidewalk w/mountable curb Install reverse curb chase as shown herein - refer to City -standard detail. EXlSlliip ROLA 3557 Urban Ct. Glavan Legend -= ROW CURRENT Road Centerline CLASS Primary road, interstate highway, limited access road Secondary road, U.S. highway Connecting road, county roads Neighborhood road, city street, unimproved road Special Road Feature N W E S to s o to Feet Horizontal Coordinate System: NAD83/92 State Plane, Colorado Central Zone 0502 Vertical Datum: NAVD88 DISCLAIMER NOTICE: This is a pictorial representation of geographic and demographic information. Reliance upon the accuracy, reliability and authority of this information is solely the requestor's responsibility. The City of Wheat Ridge, in Jefferson County, Colorado - a political subdivision of the State of Colorado, has compiled for its use certain computerized information. This information is available to assist in identifying general areas of concern only. The computerized information provided herein should only be relied upon with corroboration of the methods, assumptions, and results by a qualified independent source. The user of this information shall indemnify and hold free the City of Wheat Ridge from any and all liabilities, damages, lawsuits, and causes of action that result as a consequence of his reliance on information provided herein. J heatgc 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 303.234.5900 DATE: 06/13/2018 51 DRIVEWAY WIDTH SHOWN ON PLANS 5 r— B 1 SLOPE VARIES A 2x zx 2x zx SIDEWALK WIDTH 12:1 SHOWN ON PLANS I 12:1 B CONCRETE AND GUTTI CONCRETE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE TYPE 3 (Provide bond breaker between driveway and drive cut/sidewalk. Reverse curb chase A DRIVEWAY WIDTH _ TRANSITION SHOWN ON PLANS TRANSITION 411 6° 4" J 61' _ 6" { i CONCRETE ` CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION A -A PAVEMENT Driveway SIDEWALK WIDTH SHOWN ON PLANS 6" n - CURB & GUTTER VARIES 6 2x SECTION B-8 NOTES 1. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIPMENT, JUNCTION BOXES, AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE PLACED IN FRONT OF THE DRIVEWAY RAMP ACCESS AREAS. 2. FOR THE CURB AND GUTTER SHOWN,SEE PLANS FOR CURB TYPE. 3. RAMP SLOPES SHALL BE 12:1 OR FLATTER - Provide bond breaker between driveway and drive cut/sidewalk. DRIVEWAY (BY OTHERS) CONCRETE \ CURB &GUTTER RAMP WITH 12H:1V SLOPE (TYP.) CONCRETE _ SIDEWALK CURB & GUTTER '� TYPE 3 ISOMETRIC VIEW MODIFIED Computer File Information Sheet Revisions Colorado Department of TransportationCURB GUTTERS STANDARD PLAN NO. Creation Date: 07/04/12 Initials: DD Date: Comments 4201 East Arkansas Avenue > > Last Modification Date: 07/04/12 Initials: LTA � _=_ )i)% Denver, Colorado 80222 hone: 757-9083 AND SIDEWALKS M-6091 FuAPoth:www.coloradadot.info/business/designsupport �_ MOMMMMIll Fax: (303) 757-9820 Drawing File Nome: 609010404.d n Project Development Branch DD/LTA Issued By: Project Development Branch on July 4, 2012 Sheet No. 4 of 4 CAD Ver.: MicroStation V8 Scale: Not to Scale Units: English IVFaA City of Wh6atP,iclge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SUB -CONTRACTOR AUTHORIZATION FORM This form must be signed by each sub -contractor. Subcontractor's City of Wheat Ridge License number must be provided in the applicable space. This form will not be accepted with missing information. Project Address: SS -7 Z, e.' an ICI- Permit#446 r 3-7( General Contractor:— ale�41, Can /,;C •4 I Electrical Sub -Contractor I Company Name:. F;,% 4r ey,A Phone #:_ ?D 6y� �'�P r State License Ql,06 ? 4 / Master #:_ O / OS Wheat Ridge. Lici chse #: (required field) - S_ Signature of Aut orized Agent Dat" Plumbing Sub -Contractor I Company Name:, �e ewn o/— Phone #:-- State License # Master #: Wheat Ridge License #: (required Geld) Signature of Autl zed Agent _ Date I Mechanical Contractor I Company Name�.ueta e -.,A e.- Phone: Wheat Ridge' License #: (required field) Signature of � orized Agent Date