HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-18-07<k�o
P ,_ City of
Wheat I jdge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 291 Ave.
May 31, 2018
Nick Proctor
226 Hall Road
Bailey, CO 80421
Re: Case No. WA -18-07
Dear Mr. Proctor:
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
Please be advised that your request for a 264 square foot (44%) variance from the maximum size
of 600 square feet for an accessory structure on property zoned Residential -Three (R-3) and
located at 4373 Moore Street has been approved.
Enclosed is a copy of the Approval of Variance. Please note that all variance requests
automatically expire within 180 days (November 31, 2018) of the date it was granted unless a
building permit for the variance has been obtained within such period of time.
Please feel free to be in touch with any further questions.
Sincerely,
nc Lft�
Tammy Odean
Administrative Assistant
Enclosure: Approval of Variance
Case Report
Cc: WA -18-07 (case file)
WA1807.doc
www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
7500 West 29th Avenue City of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 `{ I h6a lqge
303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857
Approval of Variance
WHEREAS, an application for a variance was submitted for the property located at 4373 Moore
Street referenced as Case No. WA -18-07 / Proctor; and
WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the variance, relying on criteria listed in Section
26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department has properly notified pursuant to Section
26-109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; and
WHEREAS, there were no registered objections regarding the application;
NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that approval of a 264 square foot (44%) variance from
the maximum size of 600 square feet for an accessory structure on property zoned Residential -
Three (Case No. WA -18-07 / Proctor) is granted for the property located 4373 Moore Street, based
on the following findings of fact:
1. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The particular physical surrounding of the property results in a unique hardship upon the
owner.
3. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located.
4. The hardship has not been created by any person presently having interest in the property.
5. The unusual circumstances necessitating the request are present in the neighborhood and
not unique to the property.
With the following conditions:
1. The design and site plan of the proposed garage shall be consistent with the representation
depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of
a building permit.
S-)3
Da
City of
'WheatRi
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Community Development Director DATE: May 31, 2018
CASE MANAGER: Zack Wallace Mendez
CASE NO. & NAME: WA-18-07 / Proctor
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a 264 square foot (441/o) variance from the maximum 600 square
foot size for an accessory structure on property zoned Residential -Three (R-3)
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4373 Moore Street
APPLICANT (S):
OWNER (S):
APPROXIMATE AREA:
PRESENT ZONING:
PRESENT LAND USE:
Nick Proctor
Nick Proctor
11,215 square feet (0.26 acres)
Residential -Three (R-3)
Duplex
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
Location M:
Administrative Review 1
Case No. WA-18-07/Proctor
Site
JURISDICTION:
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to make an
administrative decision.
I. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a 264 square foot (44%) variance from the maximum size for a
major accessory structure in the Residential -Three (R-3) zone district, resulting in an accessory
structure measuring 864 square feet. The purpose of the variance is to allow for the construction of a
pre -fabricated detached garage.
Section 26-115.0 (Variances and Waivers) of the Wheat Ridge City Code empowers the Director of
Community Development to decide upon applications for administrative variances from the strict
application of the zoning district development standards that are not in excess of fifty (50) percent of
the standard.
II. CASE ANALYSIS
The variance is being requested so the property owner may place a garage in the rear yard of the
property. The property is located on the west side of Moore Street just south of 44th Avenue. The
property is half of a duplex that was constructed in 1954 on Lot 2 of the JayLarry Subdivision. The
County's parcel lines indicate the property underwent a duplex split. This half of the duplex sits on
approximately 11,215 square feet of land. (Exhibit 1, Aerial).
The property is zoned Residential -Three (R-3), a zone district that provides high quality, safe, quiet
and stable medium to high-density residential neighborhoods, and prohibits activities of any nature
which are incompatible with the medium to high-density residential character. The surrounding
neighborhood includes a mix of different zone districts. Along Moore Street is also zoned R-3, with the
exception of the property at the southeast corner of 44th Avenue & Moore Street, which is zoned Mixed
Use -Neighborhood (MU -N). To the east is a Planned Residential Development, the Newgate
Apartments. To the west are many residential properties zoned Agricultural -One (A-1), one property
zoned Residential -Two, one property zoned Commercial -One, and a row of homes zoned Residential -
Three. (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map).
The garage measures 36' by 24' for a total of 864 square feet. It is planned to be placed in the rear
yard, approximately 5.5-6 feet from each side property line, and approximately 150 feet from the front
property line. The applicant originally requested a reduced rear yard setback, but withdrew that request
after learning the reduced setback was not supported by Staff. As such, the garage will meet the
minimum 10 -foot rear yard setbacks. This side of the duplex does not currently have a garage. (Exhibit
3, Site Plan).
During the public notice period, Staff did not receive any calls or letters regarding the request.
III. VARIANCE CRITERIA
In order to approve an administrative variance, the Community Development Director must determine
that the majority of the "criteria for review" listed in Section 26-115.C.4 of the City Code have been
met. The applicant has provided their analysis of the application's compliance with the variance
Administrative Review
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
criteria ,(Exhibit 4, Criteria Responses). Staff provides the following review and analysis of the
variance criteria.
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located.
If the request were denied, the property would continue to yield a reasonable return in use. The
property would continue to function as a duplex unit, regardless of the outcome of the variance
request.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
A variance is not likely to alter the character of the locality. While the proposed structure will
be larger than what is permissible in the R-3 zone district, it is not out of character with the
area. Several properties to the west, zoned agriculturally, have large accessory structures in
excess of 1,000 square feet. Additionally, the properties to the south of the subject property
have large garages, in excess of 1,000 square feet, though they are multi -family properties, and
generally comply with the allowance of 600 square feet per unit maximum in the R-3 zone
district. The neighboring duplex unit to the north has a 600 square foot garage, in addition to
approximately 600 square feet of sheds (minor accessory structures), well in excess of the 100
square foot allowance for minor accessory structures in the R-3 zone district.
Accessory structures dominate many of the properties in close proximity to the subject
property, and as such the addition of an 864 square foot garage will not alter the character of
the locality.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application,
which would not be possible without the variance.
The property currently does not have a garage, which can be a substantial investment for the
property owners given the winter snowfall and potential for hail and storms during the spring
and summer. That being said, this investment would be possible without the variance, as a 600 -
square foot garage could be placed on the property.
Staff finds this criterion has not been met.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific
property involved results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as
distinguished from a mere inconvenience if the strict letter of the regulations were carried
out.
The neighboring properties to the west are zoned agriculturally, and have no maximum on
accessory structure size, so long as the maximum lot coverage of 25% is not exceeded. These
properties have accessory structures that are approximately 2,700 square feet in size, 650
Administrative Review
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
square feet plus what appears to be approximately 600 square feet of shed space in 5 sheds, 700
square feet plus 200 square feet of shed space, and 560 square feet. To the south are two multi-
family properties that are the same size as the lot this duplex sits on (pre -duplex split) of 19,160
square feet. One has 6 units, while the other has 4 units. The 4 -unit property has approximately
2,500 square feet of major accessory structures (approximately 625 square feet per unit).
Additionally, there are 5 small sheds on the property amounting to approximately 495 square
feet. The 6 -unit property has an approximately 3,680 square foot garage (approximately 615
square feet per unit). Additionally, the duplex attached to this has a 600 square foot garage and
other accessory structures measuring approximately 550 square feet. Based on the physical
surrounding limiting the accessory square footage to 600 square feet presents a hardship on the
property owner.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
5. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an
interest in the property.
The hardship stems from the City's accessory structure size limitations, which limit this duplex
unit to 600 square feet, when most neighbors have well over 1,000 square feet of accessory
structures. Sheds and detached garages dominate the surrounding area, and limiting the
property owner to only 600 square feet constitutes a hardship that has not been created by any
person presently having interest in the property.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious
to other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located,
by, among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or
development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing
the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The request would not be detrimental to public welfare and would not be injurious to
neighboring property or improvements. It would not hinder or impair the development of the
adjacent properties. The adequate supply of air and light would not be compromised as a result
of this request.
The request would not increase the congestion in the streets, nor would it cause an obstruction
to motorists on the adjacent streets. The addition would not impede the sight distance triangle
and would not increase the danger of fire.
It is unlikely that the request would impair property values in the neighborhood.
Staff finds this criterion has been met.
7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present in
the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
Administrative Review
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
Many neighboring properties have detached garages in excess of 600 square feet. This is
largely due to the different zoning designation between the Moore Street properties (many of
which still have garages larger than 600 square feet due to the number of units on the
properties) and the Newcombe Street properties. The subject property sits on Moore, and is one
of only three units on the block that does not consist of a multi -family (3+ unit) development.
In this sense, it is more in line with the characteristics of the Newcombe Street agriculturally -
zoned properties. This is true for the other two low-density properties on the block.
Staff finds that this criterion has been met.
8. Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with
disabilities.
Single family homes and their accessory buildings are not required to meet building codes
pertaining to the accommodation of persons with disabilities.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable.
9. The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the
Architectural and Site Design Manual
The Architectural and Site Design Manual does not apply to single and two family dwelling
units.
Staff finds this criterion is not applicable.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Having found the application to be in compliance with the majority of the review criteria, staff
recommends APPROVAL of a 264 square foot (44%) variance from the maximum 600 square foot
size for an accessory structure on property zoned Residential -Three (R-3) located at 4373 Moore
Street. Staff has found that there are unique circumstances attributed to this request. Therefore, staff
recommends approval for the following reasons:
1. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality.
2. The particular physical surrounding of the property results in a unique hardship upon the
owner.
3. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located.
4. The hardship has not been created by any person presently having interest in the property.
5. The unusual circumstances necessitating the request are present in the neighborhood and not
unique to the property.
With the following conditions:
1. The design and site plan of the proposed garage shall be consistent with the representation
depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a
building permit.
Administrative Review
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
4V lyatR�dge
Geographic
Information Systems
Legend
Subject Property
n
EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL
FF
i
Administrative Review 6
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
,m „o
te Projection N
.
N
77.
r
`�.
Administrative Review 6
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP
ow
— --- 45TH•AVE
'city or
Wheat�dge
Administrative Review
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
G I•
i
44THIRLT•---
r�
1V
o n 1P0 tm V.
State Plane Coordinate Projection six N
Colo atlo Central Zone A
Datum' NAD83 N
ua..wrs�:
7
Geographic
Information Systems
Legend
I Subject Property
Displayed Zone Districts
Agricultural -One (A-1)
Residential -Two (R-2)
r,
Residential -Three (R-3)
mil
Planned Residential
Development (PRD)
Commercial -One (C-1)
Planned Commercial
i
F_
Development (PCD)
Mixed Use
UJ
m
Neighborhood (MU -N)
g
O
U
.. r z
Administrative Review
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
G I•
i
44THIRLT•---
r�
1V
o n 1P0 tm V.
State Plane Coordinate Projection six N
Colo atlo Central Zone A
Datum' NAD83 N
ua..wrs�:
7
EXHIBIT 3: SITE PLAN
Administrative Review
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
EXHIBIT 4: CRITERIA RESPONSE
081812;54p Proctor Sales & Service
City of
/" Wh tdge
' COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENT
Review Criteria: Variance
303-986-7208
A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances when: a
unique physical hardship is present. Per Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code,
the reviewing authority (Community Development Director, Board of Adjustment, Planning
Commission, or City Council) shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which an
applicant demonstrates that a majority of the following criteria have been met:
P.1
1. The. property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
Permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
,�� which it is located.
lv't/ 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
1 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application,
which would not be possible without the variance.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific / property results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished
from a-moreInconvenience.
1
5. If there is a particular or unique hardship, the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been
created by any person presently having an interest in the property.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property or Improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by,
among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or
development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing
the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood.
The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present
In the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with
disabilities. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.]
The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the
+Archr7ectural and Site Design Manual [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family
homes.]
Rev. 512014
Administrative Review 9
Case No. WA -18-07 /Proctor
EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS
• �" �i rr.�7 4G
r
Bird's eye view of the property looking west. The proposed location of the garage is indicated with
a white arrow. The large accessory structures on other properties can also be seen in this
image.(Photo courtesy of Google)
Administrative Review 10
Case No. WA -18-071 Proctor
City of
" Wheat Edge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857
LETTER NOTICE
May 18, 2018
Dear Property Owner:
This is to inform you of Case No. WA -18-07 request for approval of 264 sq. ft.
(44%) variance from the maximum 600 sq. ft. accessory structure size in the
Residential -Three (R-3) zone district on property located at 4373 Moore Street.
The attached aerial photo identifies the location of the variance request.
The applicant for this case is requesting a variance eligible for administrative
review per section 26-115.0 of the Municipal Code to be granted by the Zoning
Administrator without need for a public hearing. Prior to the rendering of a
decision, all adjacent property owners are required to be notified of the request.
If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846 or
if you would like to submit comments concerning this request, please do so in
writing by 5:00 p.m. on May 29, 2018.
Thank you.
WA1807.doc
www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
Site Plan
r
�c�ty� or
Wheat�dge
Geographic
Information Systems
Lenend
Subject Property
—44TH -PL --i
I
44TH"AVE - - - — - -
•,
_I
State Plane Coordinate Projection N
Colorado Central Zona
Datum: WD83
M4�/npw�M�wygE<w. as�yA<iiou.wa N'�w
MCFARLIN CHRISTOPHER G MCFARLIN
BYBEE DANIEL P LINDA PROCTOR NICKOLAS WILLIAM
4340 NEWCOMBE ST 29281 UPPER MOSS ROCK RD 4373 MOORE ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 GOLDEN CO 80401 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
SIMMONS LEE M
90427 TIMBERS RIDGE RD
VALENTINE NE 69201
HONEBEIN JERRY J
4350 NEWCOMBE ST
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033
MORRISON R H JR
7367 MC INTYRE ST
ARVADA CO 80007
MARCUS C MUELLER TRUST
9543 BRENTWOOD WAY Unit B
WESTMINSTER CO 80021
NOTE: Land use applications must be
f submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a
V, City of planner. Incomplete applications will not
Jrr `AJhealt be accepted—refer to submittal checklists.
LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION
Community Development Department
7500 West 29th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846
(Please print or type all information)
Applicant
Phone _ Email
Address, City, State, Zip
Owner M,`y-- 9"C�c r
Phone 7ZO 41 Z4 bo Email t'Proms r t vA- - borx
_
Address, City, State, Zip -;, 4--G H0.1 I
R,4 13 ( -(,to a v 4Z 1
Contact
Phone Email
Address, City, State, Zip
(The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions
regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post
public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report
prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written
communication to applicant and owner.)
Location of request (address):_ 7.3 rvtyc7� 91-( LJkt.-. - CJ o 50C) 33
Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request):
O Change of Zone or Zone Conditions
O Special Use Permit O Subdivision - specify type:
O Planned Development (ODP, SDP)
0 Conditional Use Permit 0 Administrative (up to 3 lots)
0 Planned Building Group
0 Site Plan 0 Minor (4 or 5 lots)
0 Temporary Use, Building, Sign
0 Concept Plan 0 Major (6 or more lots)
AVariance/Waiver (from Section 26-
0 Right of Way Vacation 0 Other:
Detailed description of request:
do/o a� Ptar O� •-�-a cC.a p�'J4--
-
/ a4 rl` r (L 13,.J LJ]
41� SoJ rro°.t� I v+r CouCJ 6� 1`-r/ ���G�rr✓01 TLa
6arx7 e- w a- w °`tea 1`s hj' kt1%k6-k S4v q1.
I certify that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and that in
filing this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent
the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney
from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf.
Notarized Signature of Applicant�/�j %/z
State of Colorado
County o£a f i ►2S ss
The foregoing instrument (Land Use Processing Applications was acknowledged by me this a J day of A(� , 20
by YMJ WNBO
�} NOTARY PUBLIC
STATEOFCOLORADO
My commission expires / 0 NOTARY ID2DO44024359
Public r k�Y IXPIRESA666ST29 2018
To be filled out by staff:
Date received 5-1 �1-1V _
Comp Plan Design.
Related Case No.
Assessor's Parcel No. 39-�I1-/ -O►S
Size (acres or sgtt) ITIS
Rev 1/22/ 2016
Fee $ 200,06
Receipt No. 0t> A O l q 4S 0'0
Pre -App Mtg. Date _
Current Zoning �pc. d t.A : --3 -3
Proposed Zoning
Case No. WA -11'e)
Quarter Section Map
Case Manager
Current Use
Proposed Use
-ee7oes-t- �
�(Z-::�,\
City of Wheat Ridge
2018-05-18 15:09 CDBA
ZONING APPLICATION FEES
CDA018900 AMOUNT
FMSD ZONING APPLICATION FEE 200.00
PAYMENT RECEIVED AMOUNT
VS / 5359 200.00
AUTH CODE: 887772
TOTAL 200.00
City of
Wl�eat�gge
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Submittal Checklist: Variance
Project Name:
Project Location: 6r3 7 3 w»o6'G _2 o o 33
Rev. 5/2014
Application Contents:
A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a
unique physical hardship is present. The following items represent a complete variance
application:
1. Completed, notarized land use application form
Application fee Cbu&,(cs
1-4.
Signed submittal checklis this document)
Proof of ownership—e.g. deed
5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s)
_6. Written request and description of the proposal
Include a response to the variance review criteria—these are found in Section
26-115 of the municipal code
Include an explanation as to why alternate designs that may comply with the zoning
standards are not feasible
Include an explanation of the unique physical hardship that necessitates relief
Survey or Improvement Location Certificate (ILC) of the property
8. To -scale site plan indicating existing and proposed building footprints and setbacks
" 9. Proposed building elevations indicating proposed heights, materials, and color scheme
As applicant for this project, l hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with
this submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded,
the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event any
revisions need to be made after the second (2"d) full review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittal
fee.
Signature: Al Date: _�-� 2 – 2d 17
r'
Name (please print): ' [ t*f PC CZL Phone:
Community Development Department - (303) 235-2846 • www.ci.wheatridge.co.us
May 08 18 12:54p Proctor Sales & Service 303-986-7208 p.1
I- R 0PFI<TyIq
City of'
W heat edge
COMMUN ITY DEVELOPWNT
Review Criteria: Variance
0 T
A variance provides relief from the strict application of zoning standards in instances where a
unique physical hardship is present. Per Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code,
the reviewing authority (Community Development Director, Board of Adjustment, Planning
Commission, or City Council) shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which an
applicant demonstrates that a majority of the following criteria have been met:
1. The property in question would not yield a reasonable return in use, service or income if
j permitted to be used only under the conditions allowed by regulation for the district in
which it is located.
��
CX 2. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality.
1 3. The applicant is proposing a substantial investment in the property with this application,
which would not be possible without the variance.
4. The particular physical surrounding, shape or topographical condition of the specific
property results in a particular and unique hardship (upon the owner) as distinguished
from a mere inconvenience.
5. If there is a particular or unique hardship, the alleged difficulty or hardship has not been
created by any person presently having an interest in the property.
6. The granting of the variance would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
i other property or improvements in the neighborhood in which the property is located, by,
among other things, substantially or permanently impairing the appropriate use or
' development of adjacent property, impairing the adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, substantially increasing the congestion in public streets or increasing
the danger of fire or endangering the public safety, or substantially diminishing or
impairing property values within the neighborhood.
P OC7. The unusual circumstances or conditions necessitating the variance request are present
in the neighborhood and are not unique to the property.
Granting of the variance would result in a reasonable accommodation of a person with
disabilities. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family homes.]
�The application is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the
-�Architeclural and Site Design Manual. [Does not typically apply to single- or two-family
homes.]
Community Development Department, (303) 235-2646 www.ei.wheatridge.co.us
Rev. 512014
60
Truss Bracing Roof Purlins using 2x6 lumber Truss Bracing
---BUILDING TO BE BUILT BY A. PROFESSIONAL BUILDER'^
200 or 12
Top plate
at Top of
le Inside
d Outside
* Set Poles a minimum of T in ground
' If selling an Concrete Slab Anchor with steel Anchors, Minimum of 2' into footing Wlproper attachment
' Pole Bracing Should be done as poles are set- see bracing pictures
` In areas with Extreme Weahter Conditions, laminate poles w12x6's on both sides w1W Wood Screws
& adhesive and should run from ground level to tike bottom of the 2x10 top plate.
Place 2x10 or 2x12 Top Plate Level at top of Poles -1-2x10 or 12 on both sides of poles (ie. Inside and outside)
secure the board to the pole W14" wood screw, 4 screws per side at each pole.
` Trusses Should be placed 4' OC all bracing should be pul in as trusses are set. - see bracing pictures
Pedins should be set 30" OC
' Bracing at Top of Pole: 1-4' 2x6 on both sides of the pole and 1-6'2x6 brace from inside of Pole to Truss between the Top Plate
` Truss Bracing: Brace should run from the peak of the truss 12' to the top of the bottom cord of the 4th truss do this on both ends
" X Bracing: A 12'2x6 X should be made an top of the bottom cords of the let 4 trusses on both ends
Screw metal down to Patine w/the metal to wood scram
' Rake & Corner: Place Rake & Carrier on both ends before putting the Ridge Cap on
" Ridge Cap: Place Ridge Cap down the center of the building on top and on top of Rake 8 Comer
"'AUiLO1NG TO BE BUILT BYA PROFESSIONAL BUILDER"
pmt M
S,$3aa. Rid y
''
8 BH�• g A_3i
ig
�s
m
3g
a tat•v 4112 44 0-0.0 0.0.0
�.•• ■• tiruviK YLYy SPACINCI WOT/PLY
0-0-0 0 0-0 1 4A (n 181 lbs
___0414
__ _.... __.._w..._..__...
...._.i__._._._._... . _.----._.........._.._.__.
INK 24.0 0
4)•0.9
All glptGmShowntohe9nRic20 unless othel ile?noted,
Loading fpso
120
General
C515ummary
DeflecMgq
� W
—(loc)
GSL1CLL:
'
Eldgema: ti#L'2A06{
TC: 0.92(2-2j
1krrTT; a9Ain
111"9
Allowea
(b,7) L/120
T(OI,:
TP11.2f1f)2
RtpMbr7ncreaso:Nd
6C: 0.69(5.6)
0.62(2.7)
vCnI.L: 026in
tion 7i
1./929
9(171 1./18D
i1CLL : 0
11mMq n,a,L.: 1159E
�Wbb:
At 141
ACOL. i !
RC801011 Summary
JT Br $r Width R B. W,gh ManRaacr
1
MUOmvt; lit Maxq+indunlia M411lU lift_
Max.Hodts
17
1' 3,S is 1.96 in
5 1 9.5 in 1.116ie l,ffAll,a
.554 Me
S."rittx
-0411M
.SSA ab
ZC, IMs
Material Summary
TC SYt I z x 0
9C SYPB1 P'x 6
blobs; SYPf/3 to 4
Br"Clag Summery
'1� Brecitlg 1hnitnM1et7A ^OC. Purl{ndrpign bP OdlOta
af:91'{t01n(c PurlinM1nlC l(W,Puflindexj�hy�lhopg,
Units Sum mallry
1) 710 "IM 1103 had6 dcd11ncd [e¢ 1110 0040ft of1m1anoodond tmUnlnuced Sauw hada filrhiPaJMbjj, le oOliordmme wnhABC57 - OS wAh d� reltew Apt UW dprW inpnL' 20P• .d•
'RMUenel&Mmwidm ttol'afaC*MC,11+PaWro CAM" Partially PRmd (Co aI.0).BtlyftCnteMU(i' 1.0%ThemjnlConttllionU,dmftd(Cl .12),DOL ^1,15,
mM'4oraiglvetlen differn litrm Mpvgpllg onl�dmKlxegnvrdbnn vortQ� MMw lmlda
2)TMnbrmaheabmdeai(eledfarlheeffWM0CWindIM&innecnr&MOvAthASCE7-05 withfir. iblllMrAwordefm
CaloMiffr-"q'h-1311,No' Bad ?AWTtcg400111endwebeomldderod. DOI,n9.60 od¢gtut90MPh,1 F n¢aC.Eno%sed0ohin/Fiip.puilding
I4) Mi *MUM abrege attic londmgit>rgnoLOean aPpnad n Accordance with IBC 1607.1
to daamttnnnq wldi i8C 1607.1; minimum 9t31d.'o do Mt apply
S) Yt+larrt wi.§ tloafpned pe an AgrilaJMrnf Inas. See HCSi.to far ilemiflal{on and Ie hpol" Iffaeinp
Wile 19414m; Mmtmr)0, meat Cal, maA eh+,N NvN (Mx emnpr Map ff dfffbmnt tam aldk axlnl (m).Only lu W MoaPortimn 7n0Ra praahavn e, tna� ;Fdc,
23 0,919 .;.776IM 01, nmw .... —
t
Notes:
1) Whenthip tntre has bade ahmcn Ar±ltmlky AIsar = {1tMpnetlan, the 1]ouble Palygnn Mcllted per TPi {,20(lMhupler 3 d,all be hied,
2)HnlldingWmmtdmovodl'yteffwc{&tQfAle(mwtido0wdeadM O11101ar10hdo notomrtedI'CbY.5psf.
3)Of1p(RngVW4Pthat'vp*telfwdiyhlartheIRM dndtdhe.dendkmdmaletlalRdonctosd�C•DLtpAtsf
4)MAN, OR mdamimmtnn� fvot7ktdmcrdpfigayvl9atllCygr6dcttjpinlirmntigChaillQlha ICut(n¢6nLI gihrnxnudlhnllanstZ lOdnnlle
5) arecob mm chord'vAlh nm*mvd lemalmrU.
6) YUo "Syl- lobal elium in tha "Mnperial Btmttttoiy' ninny: k+tpctuee lite hewsptA dce{glt NtinpsoflCoalivA lune 1, 2013 acre lroed
71 f tedanm9talarnlbrpditgtmgnir perp d;, Mlhep4maofiholrumachbcrdlomidAltite(mtaShan) orthkdpdimo(tvAsdhnw�),lunsingby Mlxrn, SccBCSt A3fbrnddlrionitlftmm�nan
R) LlMad wind apliRronelltatslaued mC&C Only landing
ALL PER 9OM PARRICATINII, IdANOL N0 BR1tCfM OP R48TALEMANY IRUSS 0ASED UPON Tfa1$ TRUSS DFLSIt3t (171tAW1N0 ARF, tN37itlICTPp TO RRPER Ttt
ALL OFTFf6INS7RL1C7t01+X9, adM1TAT1ON5 ANOQilAtrl j1tCAiCOTdS S>?f PtriRTF11Nt'Fi@ iL1Q1A; MbTALPRI/fiUCTS DMIGW t9O7'fs ISSiJEI)WITli.Tf ttE-pri4F(1N
AND �/AtLAt11,Bfttt3MPAQI,P,<mON1tEQ[iAgX.bdSICNVALii)0NtYVKMN.EACILIMMi31ilLC(WNW ettenrtr:dears
Tntct3ni1d4b Software v5,9;t a9
7.4 #0 NeW Products
rNel WrhoodAdvancedSafes 11 Series Search
2017
GENERAL INFORMATION as of Dec 31, 2017
PIN/Schedule: 300201438 AIN/Parcel ID: 39-211-10-015
Status: Active Property Type: Residential
Property Address: 04373 MOORE ST lowner Name(s)
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 PROCTOR NICKOLAS WILLIAM
Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY
Neighborhood: 2408 - FRUITDALE, LEES, STONERIDGE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Subdivision Name: 382800 - JAYLARRY
3lock Lot Key ISection Township Range QuarterSection Land Sqft
0002 OOB 21 3 69 NE 11215
Total 111215
PROPERTYINVENTORY
Property Type MULTI
Design: 1 Story/Ranch
Item Quality No.
Fireplace (Above Grade) Average 1
Base Bath Average 1
Number of Units Average 1
1/2 Bath (2 fixture) Average 1
Bedroom (Above Grade) Average 2
Adjustment Code Adjustment SqF
Hot Water Heat 11325
SALE HISTORY
Year Built: 1954 Adjusted Year Built: 1954
Areas Quality JConstructionlSqft
First FlooAverage F 11325
Out ShediAveragel 1 205
Land Characteristic
Typical Location
Sale Date
Sale Amount Deed Type
Reception
02-02-1996
88,000 Warranty Deed - Joint Tenancy
F0184179
04-01-1999
131,300 Warranty Deed -Joint Tenancy
F0848245
11-03-2004
0 Public Trustees Deed
F2122052
02-18-2005
132,000 Special Warranty Deed
F2175295
06-27-2016
195,000 Warran Deed
12016063094
TAX INFORMATION
2017 Payable 2018
Actual Value
Total 240,72
Assessed Valu
Total 17,332
Mill Levy Information
Tax District
3109
County
22.4200
School
42.8780
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST
0.0000
URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD CONT DIST
0.5000
URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT
0.0570
VALLEY WATER DIST
0.0000
FRUIfDALE SAN DIST
2.1880
WHEAT RIDGE
1.8300
ARVADA FIRE DIST
14.7230
otal
84.5960
Property
Information .
10 F 3 Next
GENERAL INFORMATION
PIN/Schedule: 300201438 AIN/Parcel ID: 39-211-10-015
Status: Active Property Type: Residential
Property Address: 04373 MOORE ST Owner Names
WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 PROCTOR NICKOLAS WILLIAM
Mailing Address: SAME ADDRESS AS PROPERTY
Neighborhood: 2408 - FRUITDALE, LEES, STONERIDGE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Subdivision Name: 382800 - .AYLARRY
Block Lot Key ection ownshi Range QuarterSection Land S ft
0002 OOB 21 3 69 NE 11215
Lot
[Total 111215
Assessor Parcel Maps Associated with Schedule
LmPQ39--211.Pdf
PROPERTYINVENTORY
Property Type MULTI
Year Built: 1954
Design: 1 Story/Ranch
Improvement Number: 1
Item Quality No.
Fireplace (Above Grade) Average 1
Bedroom (Above Grade) Average Z
F0848245
1/2 Bath (2 fixture) Average 1
0 Public Trustees Deed
Base Bath Average 1
02-18-2005
Nbr of Dwelling Units Average 1
F2175295
Adjustment Code Adjustment SqF
195,000 Warran Deed
Land Characteristics
Hot Water Heat 1325
2.1880
Typical Location
SALE HISTORY
Interactive Ma❑
Adjusted Year Built: 1954
Areas Quality Construction113251
Sgft
Out Shed Average
205
First Floo Average F
Sale Date
Sale Amount Deed Tye
Reception
02-02-1996
88,000 Warranty Deed - Joint Tenancy
F0184179
04-01-1999
131,300 Warranty Deed - Joint Tenancy
F0848245
11-03-2004
0 Public Trustees Deed
F2122052
02-18-2005
132,000 Special Warrant Deed
F2175295
06-27-2016
195,000 Warran Deed
2016063094
TAX INFORMATION
2017 Payable 2018
Actual Value
Total 240,724
Assessed Value
Total 17,332
Treasurer Information
View Mill Levy Detail For Year
201
2017 Mill Levy Information
Tax District
310
County
22.42001
School
42.878
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DIST
0.0000
URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD CONT DIST
0.5000
URBAN DRAINAGE&FLOOD C SO PLAT
0.0570
VALLEY WATER DIST
0.0000
FRUITDALE SAN DIST
2.1880
WHEAT RIDGE
1.8300
ARVADA FIRE DIST
14.7230
Total
84.5960
3 2017