HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/27/2006
6:30 p.m. Pre-Meeting
;\ ~ -: n~;\
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING
February 27.2006
7:00 p.m.
CALL TO ORDER
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF February 13, 2006
PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES
Salvation Army Award to City of Wheat Ridge Employees
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
1 Citizens, who wish. may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of
3 Minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster,
2 Citizens who wish to speak on Agenda Items. please sign the GENERAL
AGENDA ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is
called to be heard
APPROV AL OF AGENDA
Item 1,
CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Motion to approve an Investment Oversight Committee
B Award ITB-06-12 2005 Crack Seal Project in the amount not to exceed
$43.301 50
C RESOLUTION 08-2006 .. AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2006
GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
$95,003.26 FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RADIO UPGRADE
PROJECT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA. FEBRUARY 27, 2006
Page -2-
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING
Item 2,
Item 3,
A REQUEST FOR HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION FOR
PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2) LOCATED AT 7495 W
29TH AVENUE.
(CASE NO WHL-05-01)
(CONTINUED FROM JANUARY 23,2006 FOR ACTION ONL Y)
A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
AND PLAT FOR PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT 4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET
(CASE NOS WZ-05-11 AND MS-05-04) (PHARO FOR BEAR LAND
HOLDINGS)
ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING
Item 4,
COUNCIL BILL 05-2006 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26
OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO
REFERENCES TO THE STREETSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL
DESIGN MANUAL.
COUNCIL BILL 06-2006 - AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE
APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2, RESIDENTIAL-TWO TO
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF
AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
7495 W 29TH AVENUE
(CASE NO WZ-05-10) (MICHAEL PHARO FOR M & E FINANCIAL LLC)
DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS
Item 5,
Item 6,
Item 7,
Board and Commission Appointments
Housing Authority Appointment
CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS
CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS
ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS
ADJOURNMENT
W~lMImJmB
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
February 13. 2006
Mayor DiTullio called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7'04 p m Councilmembers
present: Karen Adams, Karen Berry, Dean Gokey, Lena Rotola, Wanda Sang, Larry Schulz,
Mike Stites, and Terry Womble Also present: City Clerk, Pamela Anderson, City Manager,
Randy Young, City Attorney, Gerald Dahl, Deputy City Manager, Patrick Goff; Director of
Community Development, Alan White, Director of Public Works, Tim Paranto, staff; and
interested citizens
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF January 23. 2005
Motion by Mr Gokey for the approval of the Minutes of January 23, 2005, seconded by Mrs
Sang, earned 8-0
PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES
Mayor DiTullio read Proclamations for Metro Mayors and Commissioners Youth Awards for the
following students
Michael McCurdy
Kayla Knabe
Lillian Montanez-Meneses
Jeremy Campbell
Recess called at 7 11 P m
Meeting resumed at 7.22 P m
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
There was no one present to speak
Item 1,
CONSENT AGENDA:
A. RESOLUTION 03-2006 - AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005
GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE
ESTIP AGREEMENT PAYMENT TO VM RENTALS IN THE AMOUNT
OF $6,761 00
B RESOLUTION 04-2006 - AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2005
GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A
SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE ANNUAL
SALES TAX INCENTIVE PAYMENT TO THE WHEAT RIDGE URBAN
RENEWAL AUTHORITY IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000 00
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 13, 2006
Page -2-
C RESOLUTION 05-2006 - AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2006
BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL
BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE REAPPROPRIATION AND
REENCUMBERANCE OF 2005 FISCAL YEAR ENCUMBERED
FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,716,61645
D RESOLUTION 06-2006 - ACCEPTING THE MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING FOR THE DENVER METRO AUTO THEFT
TEAM
E ALLOCATION OF $40,000 FROM THE 2006 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BUDGET TO THE WHEAT RIDGE
BUSINESS DISTRICT
F Motion to adopt Revised City Council Rules of Order and Procedure
(Revised January 2006)
Consent Agenda was introduced and read by Mr Stites.
Motion by Mr Stites for approval of the Consent Agenda, seconded by Mr Womble,
carried 8-0
ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING
Item 2,
COUNCIL BILL 01-2006 - AN ORDINANCE ENACTING CHAPTER 20
OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, ENTITLED STORMWATER
QUALITY AND CONTROL.
Council Bill 01-2006 was Introduced on first reading by Mrs Sang
Motion by Mrs Sang to approve Council Bill 01-2006 on first reading, order it published,
public heanng set for Monday, August 14, 2006 at 700 P m in City Council Chambers,
and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by Mr Womble and Mrs
Rotola, carried 8-0
Item 3,
COUNCIL BILL 04-2006 - AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR A
REQUEST FOR REZONING FROM RESTRICTED COMMERCIAL (R-C)
TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD) FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 6690 W 44TH AVENUE
(Case No WZ-05-14) (Kasay Abraham)
Council Bill 04-2006 was introduced on first reading by Mrs Sang
Motion by Mrs Sang to approve Council Bill 04-2006 on first reading, order it published,
public hearing set for Monday, March 13, 2006 at 7 00 P m in City Council Chambers,
and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by Mr Schulz;
earned 8-0
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 13, 2006
Page -3-
DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS
Item 4,
Wheat Ridge Foundation Vacancy Appointments
Motion by Mr Stites to appoint Dewey Bridge to the Wheat Ridge Foundation; term to
expire March 2, 2008, seconded by Womble, carried 8-0
Motion by Mr Stites to appoint Lorraine Wright to the Wheat Ridge Foundation; term
to expire March 2, 2008, seconded by Mrs Rotola, carried 8-0
Item 5,
RESOLUTION 07-2006 - FOR REFERENDUM C ACCOUNTABILITY
AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDING
Resolution 07-2006 was introduced by Mr Schulz and he read the resolution in its
entirety into the record
Motion by Mr Schulz to approve Resolution 07-2006, seconded by Mrs Sang, carried
8-0
Item 6,
Motion Approving Formation of Budget Oversight Committee
Item 6 was introduced by Mr Gokey
Motion by Mr Gokey to approve the formation of a Wheat Ridge Budget Oversight
Committee He further moved that the City Manager's Office meet with the Mayor,
Mayor pro-tem and Council President, to determine the structure, duties and
implementation of the Budget Oversight Committee He further moved that the Budget
Oversight Committee be In place for the 2006 and 2007 budget years for the following
reasons
1 Establishing the Budget Oversight Committee would fulfill one more of the
recommendations of the Blue Ribbon Panel
2 Establishing the Budget Oversight Committee is consistent with the goals of
the City CouncIl's Strategic Plan for the City
3 The Budget Oversight Committee allows for a more open and transparent
partnership between citizens, Council and staff concerning taxpayer dollars,
seconded by Mrs Sang
Mr Gokey gave a PowerPoint presentation
Louise Turner, 11256 W 38th Avenue, testified in support of the item She stated that
this would get more citizen activity on the budget.
Roger Loecher, 4599 Carr Street, testified for the item, or if there was not a committee,
than find a way to get more citizen involvement.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES FEBRUARY 13, 2006
Page -4-
Discussion followed
Mr Gokey entered letters into the record of former Councilmembers Mancinelli and
Davis supporting the Budget Oversight Committee
Motion failed 5-3 with Councilmembers Gokey, Sang, and Womble voting yes
Motion by Mr Stites to
1 Have a budget presentation at the televised town hall meeting
2 Create a mailing list of those citizens that would like to be informed of any meeting,
information, or information on how to be involved in the budget process
3 Increase the number of public hearings on the budget.
4 Increase citizen participation by having smaller District community meetings with
staff for information and participation
5 As Council President, work with staff on an extended schedule for City Council
budget meetings,
Seconded by Councilmember Rotola
Motion to amend by Ms Berry to add to Mr Stites motion that we look at upgrading and
revamping the web-site to have better accessible and easy to understand budget
information, City Council Meeting Minutes and Agendas, seconded by Mr Schulz;
carried 8-0
Motion to amend by Mr Gokey to have a line-item budget format for these meetings,
seconded by Mrs Sang, failed 6-2, with Mr Gokey and Mrs Sang voting yes
Original Motion as amended carried 8-0.
ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS
Councilmembers expressed their appreciation for the many citizens who have applied
for Board and Commission appointments
Meeting adjourned at 8 34 P m.
1-1~~ \ .( \~rJ '-
Y/cimela Y Anderson, City Cler'R--
APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY 27, 2006 BY A VOTE OF to
Mike Stites, Council President
The preceding Minutes were prepared according to 947 of Robert's Rules of Order, i.e
they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the
members Recordings and DVDs of the meetings are available for listening or viewing in
the City Clerk's Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions
~
,~
s;._
'-:: ~
' ,-
, -
~ ~ -
.....-
. R b
"'1~ t
,
:::. -...'
~"" ~ ,
~:;---
:; :::
~ ~ ~
::.. 1-" '\,~
~ > .
'- %~
;p..... ~ ~
i ,('~
.
~~' ~
'" ~
, "'-~
-1
-
-1 -
~
-
- ~ CfJ
0i >
-.
~ ~ ~
0
:J 0 -< Q ~
0 ~
- U1 c ~ X
'Jl 7' ~ -i -
> CJ rr: 0
'J! > z
=-\ C 7', Z ::" - Z
:-'1 -.I
- l ---'\ 7' ~ (./)
~ -;j ~ - ~ ::::J >
,.'
- ;:: r, ~ ~ ?='
~ n 0
m :J:2 ~ ......<
C- O 0 ::::J rj ti, ;
- -;:; v ~ -. "'l'1
r > Z ..... Q.. c:
-, 0 r'
- CfJ (fQ , -1
..- ~ ~ z ~ -i
- 'X. ~
0 - z 0 ~ >
- z
oJ
0 - 7' S >
r ~
7J - '2: (./) CfJ
> ?=' .!::, "C 0
z -
>. ? r-, Q
- ~ -
'J! - <-
r, ~ -
\ ~ CfJ
> rI). -
Z 0
r1 Z
lfl
ITEM NO,
\ I j?,
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
I'~$~' .
I I '
!~II;IWI
. ~ J
'~
COUNCIL MEETING DATE
February 27. 2006
TITLE:
AWARD ITB-06-12 2005 CRACK SEAL PROJECT IN THE
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $43,301.50
o PUBLIC HEARING
~ BIDS/MOTIONS
o RESOLUTIONS
o ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING {Date _)
o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
QuasI-Judicial 0 ~
/ ~ No
---------- :I / ~
,J/~~ , ~
DIrector of PublIc . orks
0Z-~
City Mana
,
'--\
,j
EXECllT1VE SlIMMARY:
The 2006 Crack Seal Project wIll prOVide the needed maIntenace treatments to local streets by pnonty
in the western two third of the city The crack. fillmg treatment wtll reduce water infiltratIOn under
pavements. The streets bemg crack. sealed wtll also receive a fog or slurry seal later thiS year through a
separate proJect. These treatments will Improve and extend the pavement lIfe of these streets as part of
the ongomg mamtenance program, On February 14.2006. seven (7) bids were received. All bIds met
the mItlal bid reqUirements, except Supenor Asphalt. The apparent low bIdder was CoatIngs Inc.,
Arvada. Colorado m the total amount of $39.36500 References and expenence were evaluated by
PublIc Works. CoatIngs Inc has sucessfull) completed slmtlar CIty projects m the past. Staff
recommends a\\ard of the project to the lowest responsive bidder. CoatIngs Inc. m the amount of
$39.365 00
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
NiA
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
Bids for the 2006 Crack Seal Project, #S-PM-04-06, were opened on Tuesday, February 14,2006
Seven (7) bids were received and ranged from $39,365 00 to $59,620 00 The EngIneer's Estimate
was $45.00000 The lowest responsible and responsive bidder, Coatmgs Inc., Arvada, Colorado has
met the bId and qualificatIOn reqUirements, Based upon the contractor's demonstrated capabilities and
performance on prevIOus projects, Staff recommends award to Coatings Inc.
A 10% contmgency amount of$3,936.50 IS requested to allow for the cost of other Items related to the
project.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
No award and 2006 Crack Seal Projects will not be accomplIshed.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Funding for thiS program has been approved as the Street Preventive Maintenance Projects line Item of
the 2006 Capital Investment Program budget In the amount of$1 ,200.000.00 ThiS project IS the lirsl
one of the four preventive projects that the City wIiIImplement thiS year.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to award ITB-06-12, 2006 Crack Seal ProJect, #S-PM-04-06 to Coatings Inc. Ar\-'ada.
Colorado In the amount of$39,365.00
1 further move that a contingency amount of $3.936.50 be approved.
I further move that the dIrector of Public Works be authonzed to Issue change orders up to a total
contract and contingency amount of$43.301 50
1 further move that all costs associated With thIS contract be paid from account number 30-303-800-
884. and that these funds be encumbered for the length of the project in accordance WIth Ordinance
#787. 1989 Senes."
or.
"I move to deny award of ITB-06-12 2006 Crack Seal Project for the follOWing reason(s)
Report ImtIated h;.
Report Prepared bY'
ReVIewed b;.
Steve Nguyen. EngIneenng Manager
Tim Paranto, Director of Publutc Works
Lmda Tnmble. Purchasmg Agent
Attachments:
2006 Capital Improvement Program DescnptlOn
..., Project LocatIon Map
3 Bid TabulatIOn Sheet
060227 lTB-Ob.12 crack seal C AF doc
Capita/Investment Program
~
7. Street Preventative Maintenance Projects
2006 Budget: $1.200.000
Description: The annual street preventative mamtenance work and costs are as follows
Concrete replacement area.
Replace broken, dtstorted and non-complIant concrete curbs, stdewalks
and handIcap ramps on streets meluded m the Asphalt resurfacmg
project $ 210,000
Asphalt patchmg and overlay area,
35th Avenue, Shendan to PIerce
44'" Avenue, Harlan to Upham
PIerce Street, 29th to 44th $ 675,000
Crack/slurry sealmg area.
Westerly half of the CIty by pnonty $ 315,000
Justification: Preventative street mamtenance work IS requIred to replace defectIve concrete,
replace or add to pavement surface by an asphalt overlay, patch Isolated structural fatlures m
eXlstmg asphalt streets, waterproof and Improve the texture of asphalt weanng surfaces by a
slurry seal coat and reduce water mfiltratlOn under pavements by sealmg cracks, Preventattve
mamtenance prolongs the usefulitfe of streets and SIdewalks and reduces the costly alternatIVe
of reconstructmg streets,
8 Youngfield Street, 38th Avenue to 44th Avenue
2006 Budget: $3,600,000
Description: \\ tden Youngfield Street to a four-lane sectlon WIth center turn lane.
Justification: Recent traffic studtes have tdentilied the need for Improvements on thiS street to
accommodate present and future traffic demands.
DPW TRAFFIC
1. Neighborhood Traffic Management Projects
2006 Budget. $25,000
Description: Speed boards will be mstalled at two locatIons.
Justification: ElectroniC speed boards WIll be mstalled at two locations that have a hIstory of
excessIve speedmg,
zoo
ATTACHMENT 1
o
?J
)/"
o
7'
(j)
\'l
f:
-0
?J
o
C-
\'l
CJ
~
'}
2.
'"
;j.
c 1" I I 1 \ \ l ! \\ r'
<JJ
'" ~ ~, , \
<1, \\
0> \ ".: '~'i \ ~ \ ,;, \
c ;.: --::.. ' ..
,j, ~
1'0 :(~ ~ ~ \ \ i , - ~~,
>: ~..,) \ \
l) );) ~~C.2"-
<~5 \, \
:3 \~ "\. - ,
0.. i ""
! , ,
1
~ ! '1
'" I '\. i
,
I , ,
~ , ~,' ( \ , ,
I ~ c I \.~ I
"' ~-.t'~ '\ \ \ \\ -<
"
<(
<C 1~~ ,~ , ,
, ,
\~',\ -'"
I J-
'1\ ,
" '\ \
\ ~ ,
o ~ \ \' I
3.... ~ \
E z r- .' \, \ \' \ ,-
0.'2 'i( ;. '" ",' " " ,
o 'g " \ \
'~ ~\~ I - '--:
I o;:s I i
\~ N .:. "" -, , 1'; t"- ii,
:i. i~:>- ::.. i , -
-' '-.D ~ u.l \ -
0 ~. ~ I,. (!)J 0 ~ " , ~
() , ~ 0 f- -'(~ ,
~:.. ~ ~ ~ I t,:->\
U-lz _ ..--- w>- ~k~ , -, I
cD~N5~ ---. " ~" \ ,
ClO t:~o~u ~, \ "- , "".
0_ --- ." i I . "- \ ,
-I- 1~ I
0::4: - \ ,
\ -. I
I-..J I "
<=> \.." "
uJal I I \
I<l: :\ \ , -
~I- 'i-\ >
u.O ,I '\ \c~
oai ,p '\
>- ,1 . , " \1 , \ "-\ -1
I- , -tj : I -, , \ \ ~
() ~~t \ ,
"
" I
"\ i
-" I,. , .' , . - l~\
i ,~ "'-:.\ ,
..::!I~' \
-1.{ ....1 \
, ,...j. , \, i ':>..-1
\
~'t>: I " ") t---;
'-., \ !
~\ ----+-.. J_ ~ - ,
~ _ ~r21 , .....\ ,
\ \ \, I .....--...f-, \
" ,-~ , ,
\ 'T i --+--_ __-----II
, Z i !
I \
0.. \ U) Q
..J 0: , f- , 1 I,
4: I I/l 0 \ <( I \ I
'"
U-l ! u f- <.)
III :; <.) r-- u.. I
::s:: ex: <( '5 ::i
\ w
<.) I/l 0: <( -< i
.. u.J I- 0 :J
<t <J) <9 z 0
0:: 0 u..
0 <( 0 u.. 11
<.) 0 0.. <.) <( 0: ~ r
'-? u.J W Z 0 :J ~
:J I- U) D
I- Z 0: c/} 0 <.) 0 1!!
U 0 :J 0..
0:: >- ;:: U) ~ Z "0
W z f- u.. ~ li
--, 0 0 '" a. <( 0 :J 0 :J g>
0 0 - l/) w Ci Z ..J I- W
Z g :;: ~~ I- ....J Z ....J ;;
c:: <9 ..
w a: U) 0 0 0 0 "-
a.. > w w w en ::i iii u
..J >- o a <.) <.) W ~
0-
ATTACHMENT 3
o
U
Wz
<':>0
0-
-I-
o::~
I-...J
~::l
wID
r~
3:1-
u.O
oiii
>-
I-
U
~
."">
c:
~
0>
<(
en
c:: ~
'"
'"
.c::
!:!
~
a.
w (;
D J
~ l;
'" ~
of-
'" I1l !
z "
;f ~ >--
0-' ;:
o
z
1;1 N
~..., ~
I'~ J,
c 0
a .
I~ m
'"I-
a> _
E z
a.Q
o '"
o "
o
<"I.JN ..::
:.e >- !l.
:= .0 :s w
~ (0 '_"': 0
..: 0 IZ-
~v~s
::>,.....w>-
? N ,5"-
~o~u
i
i
1-'
u'
wi
-,
o
0::
a..
-'
~
w,
I/) ,
:.&:::
U
~
0::
U
I-
U
UJ
....,
o
0::
a..
, I ,
I I I
I I
I I ,
H
I
I
,
I
,
I
I , I i
I I
i ,
I I I
, I I
I I
I
-
I i I
I
I I
, 1 I
,
I
I
I ; i I I I i , ,
I I
I I I 1 ,
t'-I: i , I
, i !
, , I , I I I
, ,
I
I I I , I , !
I I I
I ,
i ! I i
I r
, , "'~JI
' ~ I , ! I
, ~ -J ,
\- ~ I I ! I '?~ I
~ l - \
'''''''-. ~ I -""" \ , \ \ ! I
~~~1 I , ", i \ , ,
~I ) ~ I
~ I I I " I
I .'
I , , r ,
, I ! ! I I
1 I' Z
I i I i I 0
i Cf)
I 0:: I l-
I
VJ 0 <l:
w
'-' I- U
:;; U I- u.
rr ~ >
w ..J
VJ <l: <(
- W I- 0 ::>
<J) (9 z
0 u... a
0 <l: 0 u. 0:: :;!
0 0... U <(
Cl W CD Z 0 ::>
, ::> l- I/)
z 0:: 0
Q ::> Cf) U 0 a..
0::: z >- >-- I- U. Cf) ~ z ~
0 0 '" '" <( 0 ::> 0 ::>
0 i= <J) w '" Z ..J I- CD -'
Z ..: :;; > '-' (9 I- ..J Z
W U '" ::; VJ (/) 0 0 0 0
0 w w w
> ~ >-- 00 (/) ..J U U m m
0;
..
.c
~
"
~
u
15
Co
c
,
,
)
,
" ~
0.
ITEM NO' ~I
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
'I~$~
~
IIII UII
~
COUNCIL MEETING DATE.
FebruaI) 27.2006
TITLE:
RESOLUTION 08-2006 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE
FISCAL YEAR 2006 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT
THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $95,003.26 FOR THE
POLICE DEPARTMENT RADIO UPGRADE PROJECT
o PUBLIC HEARING
o BIDS/MOTIONS
[SJ RESOLUTIONS
o ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING (Date _)
o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
Quasi-JudICIal
o
Yes
[8J
No
~)
/ 1--1
! ,/(f/~;f
0~~
City Man er ,
EXEClTIVE SlIMMARY:
Clt)' Council approved ResolutIon 05-2006 on February 13th amendmg the fiscal year 2006 budget to
reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropnatlOn for the reappropnatlOn and reencumbrance
of 2005 fiscal year encumbered funds m the amount of $2.716.616 45 Inadvertently. funds for the
Pollce Department radIO upgrade proJect were not encumbered In 2005 and therefore were not
Included as part of ResolutIon 05-2006 to be carned over mto the 2006 Budget.
To continue these proJects m 2006. a supplemental budget appropnatlOn IS necessary to transfer these
funds Into speCIfic budget lme Items m the 2006 General Fund Budget as detailed m the FmanClal
Impact sectIon beloVo
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
None
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
None
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
None
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
A supplemental budget approprIation IS requested In the amount of$95,003.26 Funds in this amount
were not encumbered in the 2005 Budget and therefore were transferred to the General Fund
unreserved fund balance. Therefore, there are adequate funds in the unreserved fund balance to meet
thIS request. The funds wIll be dIstributed as follows,
Police AdminIstratIOn Operating Supplies
Police CommunIcatIOns Operating Supplies
Police CommunIcatIOns Contractual ServIces
Police CommunIcatIOns EqUipment
Total
01- 201-650-660
01-204-650-660
01- 204- 700- 704
01-204-800-805
$14,69498
$62.412,23
$4,361 91
$13,534.14
$95,003.26
RECOMME1I,JDED MOTION:
"I move to approve Resolution 08-2006 - A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2006 General Fund
Budget to Reflect the Approval o1'a Supplemental Budget AppropriatIOn In the Amount of$95,003,26
for the Police Department RadIO Upgrade Project."
or.
"1 move to postpone indefinItely ResolutIOn 08-2006, for the follOWing
reason( s)
Report Prepared by'
RevIewed by'
Patrick GofL Deputy CIty Manager
Randy Young, CIty Manager
Attachments:
I ResolutIOn 08-2006
060117 1006 Budgel Rcapproprlallon No 2 doc
RESOLUTION 08
Series of 2006
TITLE:
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR
2006 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT
THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL
BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF
$95,003.26 FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
RADIO UPGRADE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the CIty received a grant m the amount of $1.5 million to upgrade
the Police Department's radiO system. and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved an additIOnal $157.000 to complete the
upgrade to the Pohce Department's radiO system, and
WHEREAS, the Police Department radiO system upgrade project was not
completed m 2005 and the funds for the project were madvertently released mto the
General Fund unreserved fund balance.
WHEREAS, to contmue this project m 2006 a supplemental budget appropnatlOn
IS necessary to transfer the funds from unreserved fund balance to specific budget lme
Items In the 2006 General Fund Budget:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the Ci~ of
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows:
A The City of Wheat RIdge fiscal year 2006 Budget be amended
accordmgl]. speClficall] transfernng a latal of$95.003.26 from the
General Fund unreserved fund balance to the followmg 2006 Budget lme
Items.
01-201-650-660
01-204-650-660
01-204-700-704
01-204-800-805
Total
$14.694 98
$62.412,23
$4.36191
$13.534.14
$95.003.26
DONE AND RESOLVED THIS _ day of February 2006.
ATTEST:
.Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
Pam Anderson, City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 1
ITEM NO
Q."
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
I I
I '
P:Y1
L--
COUNCIL MEETING DATE
February 27, 2006
TITLE:
A REQUEST FOR HISTORICAL LANDMARK DESIGNATION
FOR PROPERTY ZONED RESIDENTIAL-TWO (R-2)
LOCATED AT 7495 W. 29TH AVENUE (CASE NO. WHL-05-01)
D PUBLIC HEARING
~ BIDSIMOTIONS
D RESOLUTIONS
D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING
D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
QuasI-Judicial
~
Yes
D
No
[;~~~ !drdc-
~uur c1>
CIt) Managt\f ~
Community Development Director
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This publIc ht:arlng was concludt:d on January 23, 2005 and contlnut:d for actIOn only to February 27,
2005 CouncIl's motion directed staff. the landowner and the HistorIcal Society to meet to attempt to
reach a compromise regarding the historIcal deSignatIOn on the property
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
The Wheat RIdge HistorIcal SOCiety recommended approval of the deSignatIOn at a public hearing
held on December 14,2005
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
Staff, the lando\'mer, and representatives of the HistorIcal Society met on February 15th Attached
IS a roster lIsting the attendees at thiS meeting. Mr Andy Miller, a partner in the ownership of the
Site, presented hiS proposal for saving some of the structures on the site. The proposal IS to
preserve the OlInger house at ItS current location and in its current configuration and move or
replIcate the pergola somewhere else on the Site, Without the historical designatIOn of the entire
sIte, This would be accomplished through the rezonmg process by placing conditIOns on the
approval of the rezomng and/or placIng commitments on the Outline Development Plan (ODP)
Mr Miller made a further commitment to record a deed restnctlOn on the property to protect the
house, He committed to work WIth the Histoncal Society on the placement of the relocated or
replIcated pergola,
Mr Miller offered to give the farm house and barn to any entity that wanted to relocate them,
which might prove difficult. SavIng the structures on the site would significantly affect the
economics of develOPIng the site.
The recommended motion IS to not approve the hlstonc designation as requested in the
applIcatIOn. The motion is not effectIve until and unless the Council approves an ODP that
Includes several condItIOns, Including retaming the OlInger house, movmg or reconstructing the
pergola, and mmOrIng the architecture of the Olinger house. Should an ODP WIth the stated
conditIOns not be approved. the recommended demal motIon would not take effect and Counctl
would meet to take final actIOn on the histonc designation request.
The HistOrIcal Society members present at the meetIng were In agreement With the compromIse
Attachment 2 IS a letter submitted by the Society
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
...,
Approve the landmark deSignatIOn applIcatIOn.
Do not approve the landmark deSignatIOn applicatIOn.
Staff recommends the histOrIC landmark deSIgnatIon not be approved.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
No review fees are collected for the processIng of hlstonc deSignatIOn applicatIOns. There wIll be no
direct monetary Impact to the CIty If the request IS approved. Redevelopment and any subsequent
revenue gaInS from sales and property taxes may be Impacted by the landmark deSIgnatIon.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move that City CounCIl declme to approve the applicatIOn under Case No WHL-05-0l for the
follOWIng reasons
The absence of suffiCient factors under Section 26-906 of the Wheat RIdge Code of Laws;
2. The property owner does not consent to the deSIgnatIOn, and
3 The applicant and property owner have reached an agreement with respect to the preservation
of certaIn structures and elements on the site.
I further move that Case No WHL-05-0l be postponed indefinitely
2
I further move that Clt) Council's actIOn shall not take effect until the approval by the City Council of
an Outlme Development Plan for the subject property, which approval shall contam as conditIons that:
the Olinger house shall be retamed m Its present locatIOn and extenor condition; normal
mamtenance and upkeep excepted;
2. the mtenor of the mam house may be used for any purpose permitted by the then-current
zonmg;
3 the eXlstmg pergola shall be moved, If feasible, to a locatIOn or locations on the subject
property or shall be reconstructed at one or more locations on the subject property;
4 an optIOn to acqUire the old house and barn on the site (for no monetary consideratIOn)
shall be granted to any responsible orgamzatlOn, conditioned upon such option bemg
exercised and the bUildIngs moved off of the site pnor to the Initiation of anv constructIOn
on the site by the o\'mer; ~~
A
5 the architectural design of any new structures on the property wIil1bQrrow elements of the
(\0 ') architectural style of the Olinger house. IncludIng such elements as, by way of example,
\:::: roof lines and shapes, building matenals and colors, WIndow patterns, buildIng Size,
buildIng mass, and
6 the property owner shall have consented to the foregoing conditIOns of an OutlIne
Development Plan approval on the record before the CIty Council
I further move that In the event the ODP shall not have been approved, With all of the foregoing
conditIOns, pnor to Apnl 24. 2006, the demal of Case No WHL-05-0 I shall not take effect and Said
case shall be rescheduled for action only by the Council at the next available regular Council
meetIng,"
Report Prepared by Alan White (303-235-2844)
Attachments:
I Attendance of 2/15/06 MeetIng
') Letter from Wheat Ridge HistOrIcal Society
v4~
/tY~~~'"
~5 ~ \P. VIA
'" '\ v '" ,.... .
3
~ ~
""" Q, ~ f1
~ '::::::.
~ W -
"- \
f'1 -
t \ \ N -
~ ......... ~
b') N cf\ -3
~ \f\ I -
, I ~ ,
en N) ~ ~
"> ~
t{)
~
~
Q --V
~ ...
ts
\ ~
<.0 Q) .ft
<:) :) 'i c ~ ::i
<:) C 0 ~
C"l Q) .- r
~ ~ ~ ~ \L ~
\0 0.- N 'Cl <f. "
.-
< :S C -
0') Ul ~ t
'C C'l ~
~ . '-
~ Ul 0 "
~ ~ '-'
\00 \.0 .J -
.0 ~ 0.-
0.>
U- t-
~ ~ ~
r:{
)~ w
J --J
--J
\-\
t
't::
~ ~ D
w 2-
~ cr
..,- N (0 ~ UJ <.D
A TI ACllMlLNl' 1
---------- - - --
N
0- t'.-
t- r't- '--
C'l) ~ ~ ::::::-
<:::r ? ~
:r f ~
l :::r- ..,n
Oc:l N c<) -Ii:)
('() :::r t 00
I'f, \ ~
I t"""> C1
"" C ::s-
a cJ\ rfJ r'>
ro ,0
r>
5
Q
cl:.
<! \
':t..
~
.-t- ~
?
$
j t
..... ?
4: 0
V'l [
)'of) ~
s:
c-L- 0 ()
, t CJ
~ "2
~ ? ~
I:;',J ~ ~ ~
:::>
c::S CI\ -:S
....c: (S r:. ~
V) cs G) . ;j
\>
~ U '.:J-
-
- y i 0
~ ~ ~
c 0
c:0 - <;!:
<::S cl
~
.
0 ..- N C0 ><:l'" ill co I'- co
I'- co ()) ..- ..- ..,- ..,- ..- ..,- ..,- ..- ..-
Date:
Wednesday, February nod 2006
DRAFT
To: Wheat Ridge City Council
From: Wheat Ridge Historical Society
Subject: Compromise Regarding Historical Designation of Olinger Property
Introduction
The Wheat Ridge Hlstoncal Society (WRHS) contInues to be of the opInIOn that all of the OlInger
property at 29th & Wadsworth ments landmark designatIOn. SInce that optIOn has met with resistance
from the owners we have agreed to a compromise that allows for preservation of some of the most
Significant structures/features on the site.
From an hlstonc perspective, the property contaInS the follOWing contributIng structures/features.
1) 1914 OlInger House,
2) Pergola,
3) Sunken Gardens,
4) Pump house,
5) 1892 Farmhouse, and
6) 1892 Barn.
The OlInger House IS by far the most slgruficant structure With ItS closely associated Pergola and
Sunken Gardens. The Pump house IS slgruficant as an example of our rural hentage relatIng to water
and ditch nghts. The Farm house and ItS associated Barn have their own Important story to tell of
the property's earlIer agncultural connection. Non-contributIng structures/features Include the 1969
Chapel, the 1950's Garage, and the eXistIng parkIng lot.
Back2round
The WRHS also belIeves, as do a large and groWIng number of extremely warned members of the
commumty, that the property clearly meets the cntena for such deSignatIOn. It IS a well-documented
fact that George OlInger was an Important hlstonc figure In Wheat Ridge, Jefferson County, and the
surroundIng Denver metro area.
Indeed., under Sec.26-902 (lntent and Purposes) of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws such deSignatIOn
would
A. "Preserve, protect, enhance and regulate", a "remmder of past eras. "and a
person of 10calhIstonc Imporlance" (George W OlInger),
B "Ensure that the hIstonc character of the property IS preserved in development"
of the property;
C "Stimulate cultural dimenSions by fostenng the knowledge of Wheat Ridge's
hentage and cultIvate CIVIC pnde m accomplIshments of the past", and
D Allow for future "cooperatIOn With state and federal hlstonc preservatIOn
efforts" .
ATTACHMENT 2
DRAFT
Regardmg cntena (Sec,26-906) While a property need only meet one(l) of the critena for hlstonc
designatIOn, the WRHS subrruts that the Olmger property actually meets four(4) of the cntena.
2.a. It exemplIfies or reflects the broad cultural or social history of Wheat Ridge,
2.b. It IS Identified with an hlstonc person,
2.c The pergola IS a dlstmgUlshmg feature valuable for the study of ItS penod,
2 e. Unammous recommendatIOn by the WRHS board of directors.
We also belIeve that hlstonc deSignatIOn will not mterfere with part A.I ofSec 26-906 (l.e the owners'
ability to earn a reasonable return) There are a number of financial benefits for the landowner as
outlmed m Sec,26-904 (Benefits of historic landmark deSignatIOn). There are tax mcentlves, mvestment
tax credits, pnvate or publIc grants such as the State Hlstonc Fund and economIc Incentives to name a
few The WRHS would stand ready to assist m those processes whenever necessary.
Furthermore, new development could be accomplIshed under the provlSlons of Sec 26-911 and by
followmg normal land-use processes. Other cities (e.g. Golden, Arvada and Littleton) have successfully
demonstrated that hlstonc properties can produce a reasonable finanCial return for property owners and
their mUnICipalIties.
We might pomt out here that Sec 26 Art IX probably needs to be updated to Include provIsions for the
now-common concept of historic districts, That said, nothmg in the current code disallows new
construction on an hlstonc property and both major and minor changes are allowed.
In addItIOn, rezoning for other uses IS perfectly acceptable on Instonc properties, which would further
mcrease the possibilIties for finanCIal return. The WRHS has absolutely no objections to that.
Wheat Ridge pndes Itself on bemg a communIty with UnIque features. The 20/20 plan encourages us to
embrace our hentage, We feellnstonc deSignatIOn of the property, even with appropnate new
development added. would be a great asset to our communIty The wish of the WRHS remams to have
the property developed with historic designation to safeguard thiS dlstmctlve local landmark.
Report of Meetinl!,
On January 23, 2006 the City CouncIl directed staff, the owner, and the applIcant (WRHS) to meet and
reach a compromise Subsequent to that, the owners have met With City staff to revise the owners'
Outlme Development Plan.
On Wednesday, February 15, SIX members of the WRHS Board of Directors met at the OlInger House
for a tour ThiS tour was faCilItated by city staff at the owners' approval. Others In attendance Included
Jim Lindberg (Director of PreservatIOn InItiatives from the NatIOnal Trust for Histonc PreservatIOn),
Steve Turner (Director of Preservation Services from Hlstonc Denver, Inc ), Mark Rodman (Executive
Director from Colorado PreservatIOn, Inc.), Debra Andrews and MIllIe Roeder (two Board Members
from the Jefferson County Hlstoncal CommiSSIOn), Alan Femstem (Executive Director for Jeffco
Housmg Authonty), Bill Lundsford (HOUSing Development Manager for the City of Lakewood), Valeria
Horan (Grand-daughter of George Olinger), and Ann Schwayder (Denver Post) and half a dozen others
Interested In the project.
After the tour, five members of the WRHS Board of Directors met with one of the owners, Andrew
MIller, at City Hall With Randy Young and City Staff. Also in attendance for a portIOn ofthe meetmg
DRAFT
were the two gentlemen from the NatIOnal Trust and HIstone Denver, and Alan Femstem. At thIS
meetIng Mr MIller presented rus new plan for development of the Oltnger Property, As we understand
It, thIS new plan IS the end-result of work on the part of the owners wltrun their orgamzatlon and with
CIty Staff. The new plan was not open for change, although the discussion followmg Mr Miller's
presentatIOn was seen by us to be constructive at the tIme While presenting and dlscussmg his new plan
for commercIal use of the Olmger Property, Mr. Miller shared wIth us mSlghts mto hIs world of
development where, m the case of an acqUIsItIOn such as the Olinger Property, development would
ordInanly mvolve Demolition of the old and Construction of the new accordmg to the Umform
BUIldIng Code. As part of the dIscussIon, we made It clear that the WRHS was founded on an Illterest m
the hIstory of Wheat RIdge where. ItS mISSion mvolves Preservation. Rehabilitation. Restoration. &
Reconstruction of our local hentage accordIng to The Secretary of lntenor's Standards for the
Treatment of Hlstonc PropertIes.
By the end of the meetIng, we were asked to support the owners' new plan WIth the understandmg that
CIty Staff would recommend denial of the WRHS applIcatIOn for the HIstonc PreservatIOn of the entIre
OlInger Property In trade for speCific conditIons to be contallled WIthin the owners' final approved
Outline Development Plan. It was our understandIng at the meetmg that development of the property
With these speCific condItIons would Illsure that three of the hlstoncally slgmficant structures/features
would be saved on-SIte, and two of the other hIstoncally SIgnIficant structures would be offered for
rescue off sIte To thIS end, we appreciated the owners' willmgness to make the savmg of the Olmger
House, Pergola, and Sunken Gardens a reality
Conditions of Compromise
In conSIderatIon of the meetmg and mformatIOn we have slllce receIved, and WIth reference to The
Secretarv of Intenor's Standards for the Treatment of Hlstonc PropertIes (see Standards attached), thiS
report IS submitted In support of an OutlIne Development Plan for the Olinger Property based on the
proVISIOn that the final approved ODP contaInS specific condItIons that portray the follOWIng mtentIOns
The property shall be subdIVided mto two parcels (see SIte Plan attached) leavmg the southern
parcel contaInIng the Olmger House, the Chapel and the Sunken Gardens as It IS,
A deed restnctIOn III perpetuIty shall be recorded requmng that the Standards for Rehahilitation
shall be applIed to the extenor of the OlInger House and Its eXIstIng settIng, whIch Illcludes the
formal front entranceway, the deSIgn landscape around the house, and the mature healthy trees,
In the meetIng It was presented to us that the Pergola needed to be moved due to eXlstmg COOT
nght-of-way and future plans to Widen Wadsworth. We have SInce learned from COOT that
plans do not yet eXIst for the WIdenIng of Wadsworth between 32nd Avenue and Colfax, the
Pergola IS not currently m]eopardy from State Highway dedication and won't be for many years,
Thus, the Pergola shall remam m ItS hlstonc locatIon and shall be reconstructed by an
expenenced PreservatIOn Contractor capable of performIng the work in adherence with the
Standards {or Reconstruction,
The eXlstmg Sunken Gardens shall be retaIned under the Standards for Preservation. If the
Sunken Gardens become endangered, then an alternate treatment plan (l.e, Rehabilitation or
Reconstruction) shall be adopted. The chOIce of alternatIVe treatment plan will recogmze the
Sunken Gardens IS a slgmficant hlstoncal feature associated closely WIth the Olinger House's
ongInal use and has pnonty over the Chapel In ItS consIderatIOn for ultImate survIval on the
property m ItS ongmallocatIOn,
..,
3
4
r, s:'J t~ =T
b-I1 _ ~ j"~a!
5 The eXistIng 1892 Farm house and 1892 Barn shall be offered for removal from the property (for
no monetary consideratIOn) to any responsible party, conditIOned upon such option bemg
exercised and the bUlldmg moved off of the site pnor to the InitiatIOn of any constructIOn on the
site by the owners;
6 The architectural design of any new structures. Including associated sIgnage features. on the
property will borrow elements of the arclutectural style of the Ohnger House. IncludIng such
elements as. by way of example. roof hnes and shapes, buildmg matenals and colors. wmdo\\
patterns. bUIldIng Size, and bUIldIng mass;
7 The eXIstmg trees on the southern parcel shall not be removed for reasons other than vcnfied
condltlOn of disease. All reasonable attempts to leave eXIsting healthy trees on the northern
parcel shall be made exceptmg the removal of trees absolutely deemed necessary by the owners
for new constructIOn on the northern parcel,
8, The access onto the property from the northeast comer shall be restncted to "pedestnan only"
traffic.
9, The property owners shall have consented to the foregoIng conditIOns of the OutlIne
Development Plan approval on the record before the City Council.
Partin2 Thou2hts
We are contmumg to dISCUSS the Issue of standards of rehabIhtatlOn, reconstructIOn. and preservatIon as
applIed to the House, Pergola and Sunken Gardens. It IS cntIcal to the City of Wheat Ridge that some
standards be m place, m addltlOn to the recorded deed restnctlOn, to make 'savmg the Olmger mansIOn'
meamngful.
Although no answer to the preservatIon of all the hIstoncally SIgnIficant structures/features on the
property IS ImmedIately available and no long-term guarantee eXlsts for the savmg of the entIre property
unchanged, the WRHS feels the proposed compromise presents one possible solution for the Olmger
Property's contmued presence m Wheat RIdge as a umque and Irreplaceable landmark,
STANDARDS FOR REHABILITATION
f'; r-. '" r:- "T'
8 '; ,~,} (,.. i"", Ii
U~i.i""",i II
NOTE: AS APPLIED TO THE OLINGER HOUSE & ITS SETTING, THE TERM "PROPERTY"
WOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE TERM "HOUSE & SETTING" IN THE STANDARDS AS
LISTED BELOW,
REHABILITATION IS DEFINED AS the act or process of making possible a compatible use for a property
through repair, alterations, and additions while preserving those portions or features which convey Its
historical, cultural, or architectural values.
1 A property will be used as it was historically or be given a new use that requires minimal change to its
distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships.
2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved The removal of distinctive
materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that characterize a property will
be avoided.
3 Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use. Changes that create
a false sense of historical development, such as adding conjectural features or elements from other
historic properties, will not be undertaken
4 Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and
preserved
5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship
that characterize a property will be preserved
6 Deteriorated historic features will be repaired rather than replaced Where the severity of deterioration
requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature will match the old in design, color,
texture, and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features will be substantiated by
documentary and physical evidence.
7 Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means possible.
Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used,
8 Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed,
mitigation measures will be undertaken
9 New additions, exterior alterations, or related new construction will not destroy historic materials,
features, and spatial relationships that charactenze the property The new work will be differentiated
from the old and will be compatible with the historic materials, features, size, scale and proportion,
and massing to protect the integrity of the property and its environment.
10, New additions and adjacent or related new construction will be undertaken in a such a manner that, if
removed in the future, the essential form and integrity of the historic property and its environment
would be unimpaired
RehabilitatIon as a Treatment
When repair and replacement of deteriorated features are necessary, when alterations or additions to the
property are planned for a new or continued use, and when its depiction at a particular period of time is not
appropriate, Rehabilitation may be considered as a treatment.
STANDARDS FOR RECONSTRUCTION
DRAFT
NOTE: AS APPLIED TO THE OLINGER PERGOLA, THE TERM "PROPERTY" WOULD BE
REPLACED WITH THE TERM "PERGOLA" IN THE STANDARDS AS LISTED BELOW
RECONSTRUCTION IS DEFINED AS the act or process of depicting, by means of new construction, the form,
features, and detailing of a non-surviving site, landscape, building, structure, or object for the purpose of
replicating its appearance at a specific period of time and in its historic location
1 Reconstruction will be used to depict vanished or non-surviving portions of a property when
documentary and physical evidence is available to permit accurate reconstruction with minimal
conjecture, and such reconstruction is essential to the public understanding of the property
2 Reconstruction of a landscape, building, structure, or object in its historic location will be preceded by
a thorough archeological investigation to identify and evaluate those features and artifacts which are
essential to an accurate reconstruction If such resources must be disturbed, mitigation measures will
be undertaken
3 Reconstruction will include measures to preserve any remaining historic materials, features, and
spatial relationships.
4 Reconstruction will be based on the accurate duplication of historic features and elements
substantiated by documentary or physical evidence rather than on conjectural designs or the
availability of different features from other historic properties. A reconstructed property will re-create
the appearance of the non-surviving historic property in materials, design, color, and texture
5 A reconstruction will be clearly identified as a contemporary re-creation
6 Designs that were never executed historically will not be constructed
Recon<,truct'on as a Treatment
When a contemporary depiction is required to understand and interpret a property's historic value (including
the re-creation of missing components in a historic distnct or site ); when no other property with the same
associative value has survived, and when sufficient historical documentation exists to ensure an accurate
reproduction, Reconstruction may be considered as a treatment.
STANDARDS FOR PRESERVATION
~n ^ ~T
'-'oiI~IoI~~r '
NOTE' AS APPLIED TO THE OLINGER SUNKEN GARDENS, THE TERM "PROPERTY"
WOULD BE REPLACED WITH THE TERM "SUNKEN GARDE:NS" IN T~E: STA"-'DlIRDS AS
LISTED BELOW,
PRESERVATION IS DEFINED as the act or process of applying measures necessary to sustain the existing
form, integrity, and materials of an historic property Work, including preliminary measures to protect and
stabilize the property, generally focuses upon the ongoing maintenance and repair of histonc matenals and
features rather than extensive replacement and new construction New exterior additions are not within the
scope of this treatment; however, the limited and sensitive upgrading of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing
systems and other code-required work to make properties functional is appropriate within a preservation
project.
1 A property will be used as it was historically, or be given a new use that maximizes the retention of
distinctive materials, features, spaces, and spatial relationships. Where a treatment and use have not
been identified, a property will be protected and, if necessary, stabilized until additional work may be
undertaken
2. The historic character of a property will be retained and preserved The replacement of intact or
repairable historic materials or alteration of features, spaces, and spatial relationships that
characterize a property will be avoided
3 Each property will be recognized as a physical record of its time, place, and use Work needed to
stabilize, consolidate, and conserve existing historic materials and features will be physically and
visually compatible, identifiable upon close inspection, and properly documented for future research.
4 Changes to a property that have acquired historic significance in their own right will be retained and
preserved
5 Distinctive materials, features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship
that characterize a property will be preserved
6 The existing condition of historic features will be evaluated to determine the appropriate level of
intervention needed Where the severity of deterioration requires repair or limited replacement of a
distinctive feature, the new material will match the old in composition, design, color, and texture
7 Chemical or physical treatments, if appropriate, will be undertaken using the gentlest means pOSSible
Treatments that cause damage to historic materials will not be used
8 Archeological resources will be protected and preserved in place. If such resources must be disturbed,
mitigation measures will be undertaken
Preservation as a Treatment
When the property's distinctive materials, features, and spaces are essentially intact and thus convey the
historic significance without extensive repair or replacement, when depiction at a particular period of time is
not appropriate, and when a continuing or new use does not require additions or extensive alterations,
Preservation may be considered as a treatment,
~
0-
I
<D
W
:r;
t-
l.c
o
o
t-~
t;2S
~~
01-
<Do'
W~
~~
<J:~
lio~
.-~
'-:0
6~
>-: V) ~
Wns:
> ..
0::: .~ ;=
:::) ~:;:
:.f) ~ ~
0"
.t-~
<( .~
. <0_
f-<'<
-.J6
<(~
w
en
l.c
o
~ i :]
~, ~ ~-
~. .
~~j
";1--..
/ ~ ',-
,/ "',- .. ,,",I"" ... -;,',
. /;~ ,.1"", ".", '.', ~
",' ;,;,1,' ",',"
~ I' ;If '-, " '. " /:<:.~~::: /;':' -
~~ '-/'
o ".~l~.i~~iJ~~
I h>~~."h-~ ~
! ~~r~;~i'~~i~
:ii~~~dii~i,iH
" e~a~it~l-$dH
!~~m~ir~i~~H i
"~ ~a~.~~, ~\"i:~ .;
- OJ. ~ "t-.~'~~~ l~. . i
I h"' lliioP~" .~! <
~ ~",~~d.~hi5i~d i
~ rh ~H~l~!s~m~ h
~ ,~;; e~hh;l.~.~~ ~
.
v
.......
~~
~1
'I'-......,
:r ~g
\I .-
,) r
,/ I
~~~ jl
rl-l *
~~l :
-ta ~ I
,
.
~
.
:J
.
w
en
.....
I
t-
~
o
.....
t-
<:
U
o
..J
W
U
a:
'"
Q.
. ~
c'
~i
:';; i ~
S~ ~.~ ~ S~>
.n~-:S. Ie~
S~::~ ~ ! ! :Iu
~'ihlili8H!~
II ~ ' ~ I I , a
!I - - I " ~ [~ ", ~ 1'1 : < i
;-.... ...~ 11)./'/) ~, !
.O.:Wl...~~~r Irf~o
II t
ra ,''>'; t 18 ~;; ~; ';l6'~' "\
' I d . <~ lS; ~l a~I~~E '.
-' · I " '15,~;~ ~~. Ii
l- ~ E I.. _~. if: ~ Ii Ie!
M l .!! ~; L s ~If~r I~~
~' I 8: ~ if' h~ IE _l~~~~t i~; j
~! 6 -5~ .~. ~c~.. .'.; , ,1
~ .~ .' ",,1 ~!/~ :.~ 1l'~YEl" i . I'~
. ~. ~ w.~ r ~~ :l"i;.. .. ~ " "~I
-Ii! t! ~a... - < '" i1.. ~ I
~ 01; t~i ~b ilti g~;~ l ~ ~ii
~; I. .;" i~~ eL ~~~~~i~ ~ i l:l'
~5 ~. ~i~ ~~! if ~~;J~!~ ~ i ~'Itl
~ ~, ~5 i.- 5;- xi ~~;~! ~ ( . ~ ~!
~ _~ ..I ..il ,.g ~~ ....lg~5 - ~ ~;1~
n~ l- [:1'
11\ ~I l~ L '~, "I~.'~ f '
\......- I " I ...
\ I 1 "'~- -~.
\ : '.1 \~~
\ '\ ! ! ~I I j"
\~ ~ ~ - i'"
I w ~ I \ I
~J ~!,-,-! L ! j
~
!~g
,""
,",
\ .=j~<~'
, >.,ie. ~
I ~. ~~6.
I ~~i~~i
j u.
I
I
,
I
J
I
I
.'
>,.'
<a
~I
I '
i :
~ U a H
i .it;dl~l~
. = ! ~ ~~ ~ i ~, i
laH';;.~I. <
" -. 0 J.t ~ II . ell . ....{; ..
!
L
,-..,
.....
,--
-"-
..-
&..-
o
?
"--
...0<
~.
i
.~~~j
Btt...;;;&
\~'" ~o~~;.
: i'
~l
Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc.
September 23, 2005
Ms. MeredIth Reckert
Seruor Planner
CltV of Wheat RIdge
7500 West 29th Avenue
Vvneat RIdge, Colorado 80215
Re Medved - Parkmg Study
Dear Ms, Reckert:
As a functIon of the entItlement process for the Medved expansIOn we are provldmg the
followmg mformatlOn and conclUSIOns related to parkmg at auto dealershIps. We have
revle\\ed the parkmg cntena \vhlch are m place m several metro areajunsdlctlOns. We
have also revIewed four submIttal documents m vanous JurisdIctIOns. The followmg
trends seem to be apparent.
· Not all dealersrups are sImIlar m sIze and functIOn. Compared to a conunerClal use
such as food store or general office, auto dealershIps can vary WIdely m theIr SIze,
scale, and possible relatIOnshIp to adjacent or related dealershIps.
· Some junsdlctlOns appear to recognIze the above stated trends and base theIr parkmg
reqUIrements on a break down of on-sIte functIon such as dIsplay, servIce, office,
parts/warehouse, employees, etc Others have cntena whIch mayor may not apply to
all dealershIps.
· Most junsdlctlons reconunend 1 space per 1000 square feet of bUlldmg, dIsplay area
or m Wheat RIdge, lot area. An addItlOnal parkmg cntenon mcludes 1 space per
employee at maxImum shIft and 3 spaces per servIce bay. ThIs cntenon appears
somewhat constant m several junsdlctlOns,
· Some junsdlctlOns such as An'ada, LIttleton, and \Vestmmster have no cntena for
auto sales. They refer to other jUnSdlCtIOnS for cntena when needed or utIlIze related
cntena applIcable to mdIvldual dealershIp functIOns,
In our sItuatIon we are accomplIshmg at least three thmgs.
I We are provldmg InItIal parkmg for the proposed Hununer dealershIp ThIS InItIal
phase of the overall zonIng approval \VIll be followed as the market allows by
addItIOnal faCIlItIes
') Vie WIll be provldmg an area for Inventory parkmg to relIeve pressures on the
eXlstmg dealershIps.
3 \\' e \vl11 be IncorporatIng the reqUIrement to prOVIde for employee parkIng from the
eXIstIng dealersrups. ThIS IS to proVIde relIef to the eXlstmg SItuatIOn whIch reqUIres
parkmg on Parfet Street.
283" 'V;'esr Oxrord A\'e" "6, Englewood, Co I,
EXHIBIT 4
3/783.3773 . e-mail: mplmdplm<1'aoLcorn
. I
2
The Wheat Ridge criteria are somewhat confusmg In that "lot area" is not defined. Ifwe
assume that lot area mcludes only the dealershIp structure and perhaps extenor dIsplay
area, the standard IS supportable. Iflot area extends beyond the structure to mclude
parking and openspace areas It does not. The cntenon of 1 space per employee on
maxImum shift IS m Ime with other Junsdlctions.
Based on our mvestlgatlOns, we recommend the following criteria be applied to the
Medved expansIOn.
. 1 space per 1000 square feet of mtenor and extenor dIsplay area
. 1 space per 250 square feet of office area
. 1 space per 1000 square feet of warehouse area
. 3 spaces per servIce bay
Our ImtJaI submittal for the Hummer dealershIp WIll generate the followmg.
. :t 8000 square feet of dIsplay 8 spaces
. :t750 square feet of office 3 spaces
. 8 employees at maxImum shift 8 spaces
. no servIce/no warehousmg 0 spaces
Sub- Total 19 spaces 19 spaces
. employees from eXIsting dealership
. mventory
Total
50 spaces
177 snaces
246 spaces
Future improvements mcludmg planned expanSiOn of the Hummer inventory storage
area, the other dealershIp, warehousmg and service facil1ties wlll generate approxImately
185 spaces, AddItIOnal mventory storage wlll be approxImately 68 spaces. These spaces
wIll be delmeated m future phases. Total on-site parkmg or mventory storage spaces for
the 10 acre property w!ll be approximately 500 spaces.
Please let me know If I can answer any questiOns.
MGP/las
c John Medved
Diana Blanch
Denrus Polk
Bruce McLennan
Wendell Ayers
Marshall FIshman
.--
Juri~diction
- _..A~~c:;ounty - Car Dealership/Sales
, - -Arvad <3 - Auto Sales
-Arvi' ~ - Warehouse
- --Cas!.1 ~ Rock - Auto Sales
Ratio/Spaces
1 space per 1000 sq, ft. auto display area plus
1 space per employee on max, shift
n/a, has never come up
1 space per 1000 sq ft. GFA
1,5 space per 1000 sq. ft. indoor display plus
3 space per service bay plus
1 space per employee at max shift
1 space per 1000 sq ft, GFA plus
3 spaces per 1000 sq. ft. retail/office plus__
1 space per company vehicle
1 space per 1000 sq. ft, auto display area plus
1 space per employee on max, shift
case by case
cas~case
5 space per 1000 sq. ft. GFA
1 space per 1000 sq, ft. GFA
as per any other jurisdiction or '_____
1 space per 300 sq ft,
1 space per 800 sq ft,
n/a, utilize related criteria
1 space per 200 square feet - showroom/parts
1 space per 500 square feet - service
1 space per 1000 sq. ft. lot area plus
1 space per employee on max,'shift ----
-'castle Rock"::.'tVarE';house
----
-c~ nnial - Car Dealership/Sales
Gol~ n - Auto Sales
-GOld ~..I1_~WarehousE!
--Lakeyvood - Auto Sales
-Lake~~oi - Warehous
.- Litti~ton - Auto Sales
-. Littleton - Warehouse
- westminster - Auto Sales
-~-~
-~atl3idg~ -~"'" Car Sales, et al
(
CASE NO WHL-05-0l
Add additional conditlOn 5A, to read.
No application for a demohtion penmt shall be accepted, nor any such permit issued by
(}- . the City for the Olmger house (mansion) or the pergola until the pending ODP
application for the subject property has either been approved or demed, pursuant to the
customary review process for such applicatlOns.
ITEM NO. 3,'
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
IlJk
-;; ~ i
I // I
COUNCIL MEETING DATE.
February 27, 2006
TITLE:
A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF A FINAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLAT FOR PROPERTY ZONED
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT
4900 AND 4990 P ARFET STREET (CASE NOS. WZ-OS-ll AND
MS-OS-04/PHARO FOR BEAR LAND HOLDINGS)
~ PUBLIC HEARING
o BIDSIMOTIONS
o RESOLUTIONS
o ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING
o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
QuasI-JUdiCial
~
Yes
o
No
"!ofL
{l~/'
Community Development DIrector
CIt}~l~'~,~
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
A Final Development Plan and plat approval IS beIng requested for the propertIes located at 4900
and 4990 Parfet Street. The Intent of the approval IS to allow for constructIOn ofa new auto
dealership ThiS property was rezoned In July of2005 from A-I, Agnculture-One and C-I,
CommerCial-One to Planned CommerCial Development (PCD)
Planmng Commission reviewed these requests at publIc hearIng held on February 2, 2006 MotIOns
were made to recommend approval of both the Final Development Plan and plat WIth reasons and
conditIons detailed below
ThIS CIty CouncIl actIon IS related to Goal 4 of the Strategic Plan to promote 1-70 as a major
commerCial center by proVIdIng destInatIOn retaIl busmesses and an expanded tax base and mcreased
property values.
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDA nON:
Planning Commission reviewed these requests at public hearing held on February 2, 2006 A motion
was made to recommend approval of the Final Development Plan for the follo\.vmg reasons:
1. ProvIsIOns for employee parking have been incorporated into the FDP.
2 The Fmal Development Plan is consistent with the standards set forth in the approved
OutlIne Development Plan for the site.
3 All reqUIrements for a PCD Final Development Plan have been met.
With the followmg conditions.
I The drainage system for the northern portion of the site be redesigned to accommodate
a half-\\oldth (30') dedicatIOn for W 50th Avenue.
., Pnor to installatIOn of the vehicle demonstratIOn testmg area, additional mformatlon be
provided regarding the use, maintenance and management of this area.
3 The applicant contmue working with the ditch companies to resolve concerns prior to
issuance of a building permit.
4 The applIcant contmue working With the Clear Creek Valley Water and Sarutation
Dlstnct for inclUSIOn mto the district for sanitary sewer purposes.
5 The final development plan be modified on page 3 of7 to require that employee parking
for the new dealership be changed from 19 to 25, employee parking for the existing dealership be
changed from 50 to 75 and mventory and/or guest parking be changed from 173 to 142.
Planmng CommissIOn also recommended approval of the final plat for the followmg reasons:
I All reqUIrements of the SubdiviSIOn RegulatIOns have been met.
2. Staff recommends approvaL
With the followmg condItIons
1. 30' of right-of-way be dedicated for West 50th Avenue and the easements on the north end
be redefined to reflect reqUIred changes.
Two area property owners were present at thiS publIc hearing to speak to this request. The adjacent
property owner, Chuck Stiesmeyer reSiding at 4996 Parfet Street, spoke regarding the parking of
vehicles on Parfet Street, excessive traffic speeds on Parfet Street, lightmg, construction of drainage
Improvements and the extensIOn of W 50th A venue.
Mike Rich IS the new property owner of 4980 Oak Street, He spoke in regard to the narrow width of
Oak Street. He thmks extensIOn of W 50th A venue would be beneficial to hiS busmess.
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
West 50th Avenue
2
The applicant does not concur with Staffs and Planning Commission's recommendatIOn that W
50th Avenue be dedicated (#1 of Planning CommissIOn's conditIOns of the FDP approval and #1 of
Plannmg Commission's condition of the plat approval recommendation) At the zone change
heanng in front ofOty Council in July of2005, a dedication for W. 50th Avenue dedication was
not made a conditIOn of approvaL The applicant has indicated that dedicatIOn and construction of
50th A venue will provide no benefit to the property owner
Staff feels the construction ofW. 50th Avenue between Oak Street and Parfet is critical. Wmston
ASSOCiates has been workmg with staff in the creatIOn of three subarea plans, one of which IS for
the northwest area m the City with boundarIes generally from W 52nd Avenue to the north 1-70
Frontage Road and Ward Road to Tabor Street. Transit Onented DeSign (TOD) is bemg explored
due to RTD's planned lIght rail transit stop for the Goldline m the vicmlty of Ward Road and W.
50th Place. The mtent of TOD is to encourage pedestrian activity through the use of street grids
which m turn Impacts the type, form and quality of commercial development. Although the
proposed subarea plan circulation plans are not adopted, they mclude a recommendatlon for the
50th Avenue through connectIOn.
Not only IS the extenslOn of 50th A venue essential to provide the east/west grid connectlons for
TOD but also to prOVide a secondary access route through the City's industrial area, BeSIdes the
north 1-70 Frontage Road, there are no other east/west road connections between Kipling and
Ward Road. 50th Avenue between Kiplmg and Miller was recently constructed as part of the
Arvada Rtdge commercial development. 50th Avenue between Miller and Oak Streets is already
completed. as IS a portIOn east from Robb Street to the northwest comer of the eastern Medved lot
with unbUllt right-of-way extendmg from the temporary cul-de-sac east to Parlet. AcqulSltion of
this sectIOn of 50th between Parfet and Oak Streets would ensure the future completIOn of the
east/west connectIOn between Klplmg and Ward Road.
Drainage
ThiS property IS located wlthm the Columbme Basm Dramage Outfall plan area. ThiS is a major
regIOnal dramage system plan which mcludes properties to the northwest m Arvada, contmues east
through the ne\'. development at 50th A venue and Kipling, to past Garnson Street. The plan, adopted
by Urban Dramage and Flood Control Dlstnct m 1994, shows reqUlred conveyance facIlitIes on the
site runnmg north along Oak Street to W 50th Avenue and extendmg over to Parfet Street. To
accommodate the new dealership, off-site improvements between Oak and Mdler must also be
completed,
IfW 50th A venue IS reqUlred to be dedicated, both the Fmal Development Plan and plat would need to
be moddied to shIft the dramage along the northern property lme to the south. Required modifications
on the north end should not affect the proposed FDP for thiS phase of the development which is
located farther to the south.
All of the dramage Improvements noted above must be completed With this proposed phase of
development. The applIcant's engineers are workmg on acquiSltlon of the off-Site property UntIl the
off site Improvements are completed, a temporary retentIOn facilIty will be allowed.
3
Parking on Parlet Street
One of the major Impacts of the Medved autoplex has been parklllg. The Zorung and
Development Code requires that commercIal developments provIde all parking for customers,
employees and inventory on-site. In each of the previous land use approvals for the dealershIp, the
Issue of cars parkIng on Parfet Street was addressed. There appear to be up to 50 velucles parked
on Parfet Street most of the time. A condition of approval of the zone change and ODP in 2005
was that employee parklllg for all three parcels be accommodated on sIte and that there would be
no exceptions. As such, StaffreqUlred a parklllg study with the FDP and plat submIttal. Staffhas
reviewed the submItted analysIs and concluded that the analysis is credible A parkmg breakdown
on Sheet 3 of the proposed FDP lllcludes 19 spaces for employees of the new dealership, 50
employee parkIng spaces for the overall autoplex and 173 inventory and/or customer parkmg
spaces.
At the February 2 Planmng CommIssion, condItion #5 of their recommendatIOn of approval of the
FDP was that this parking breakdown be reallocated to mcrease the nwnber of autoplex employee
parking spaces from 50 to 75, thereby reducing the inventory/guest parking spaces from 173 to 148.
The applicant does not concur with this condItIon.
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:
Do not approve this request.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
A one tIme review fee was collected for the processmg of this applIcation. AddItional rcvlew fees wIll
be reqUired for the processing ofthe bUIlding permit. Sales tax revenues are generated from the sale of
verucles to Wheat Ridge residents only Sales tax revenues wIll be generated by the sales of auto
parts. Use tax will also be collected on any bUlldmg materials.
RECOMMENDED MOTIONS:
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Option A
"1 move to APPROVE Case No. WZ-05-11, a request for approval of a Planned Commercial
Development Final Development Plan for propertIes located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street for the
followmg reasons.
I ProviSIOns for employee parkmg have been Illcorporated mto the FDP
2. The Final Development Plan IS consIstent WIth the standards set forth m the approved
Outlme Development Plan for the sIte.
3. All requirements for a PCD Final Development Plan have been met.
With the followmg condItions
4
I, The dramage system for the northern portlOn of the site be redesigned to accommodate
a half-width (30') dedicatlOn for W 50th Avenue.
2. Pnor to mstallatlOn of the vehicle demonstration testing area, addltionallllformation be
provided regardmg the use, mailltenance and management oftlus area.
3 The applicant contmue workmg with the ditch companies to resolve concerns pnor to
Issuance of a buildmg permit.
4. The applicant contmue working With the Clear Creek Valley Water and SanitatlOn
District for mclusion mto the dlstnct for sarutary sewer purposes."
OR
"1 move to DENY Case No WZ-05-11, a request for approval of a Planned CommefClal
Development Fmal Development Plan for properties located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street for the
follo\\'lllg reasons
2"
FINAL PLAT
OptIOn A
"I move to APPROVE Case No MS-05-04, a request for approval of a final plat for property
zoned Planned CommerCial Development located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street for the followmg
reasons
..,
All reqUirements of the SubdiVISion RegulatIOns have been met.
Staff recommends approval.
With the followmg conditions
30' ofnght-of-way be dedicated for West 50th Avenue and the easements on the north end be
redefined to reflect reqUired changes."
OR
Option B:
"1 move to DENY Case No MS-05-04. a request for approval of a final plat for property zoned
Planned Commercial Development located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street.
2."
Report Prepared by: ~leredlth Reckert (303-235-2848)
ReViewed by' Alan White
5
Attachments:
1. Planmng CommIssion staff report (with exhibIts)
2. Correspondence from applicant dated February 16,2006
Request for City Council Action-report form
6
CITY OF 'WHEAT RIDGE
PLA..~G DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO' Flanmng ComrlllsslOn
CASE l\fA;.~AGER. M, Reckert
CASE ~O. & l"AME-
WZ-05-11IMS-05-04
DATE OF MEETL"IG Feb 2,2006
ACTION REQUESTED'
Approval of a PCD final development plan and plat
LOCATION OF REQlJEST' 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street
APPLI CA.c'\'T fOWNER:
MIchael G Pharo AssocIates for Bear Land Holdings
APPROXD1ATE AREA,
10.59 acres
PRESENT ZONING
Planned CommercIal Development
ENTER J'\'TO RECORD:
() COMPREHENSNE PLAN
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE
(X) SUBDNISION REGULATIONS
(X)
(X)
CASE FILE & PACKET MA TERlALS
DIGITAL PRESENT A TION
,i C
~ . ;\
~l..) : A-1
I (~--.-J td
..t --.:: ~
I', \ Pqo
Location Map
A-1
I II-" i ,--;
I
---'
\" L_c
c.
Existing Oealershi Properties =
~
Planning COl1111llssion
WZ-05-11fMS-05-04
1
ATTACHMENT 1
All notIficatIOn and postIng requirements have been met; therefore, there is junsdIctlOn to hear thIS
case.
I. REQUEST
ThIs applIcatIOn IS for approval of a Planned CommercIal Development Final Development Plan and
plat for propertIes located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street. The purpose of thIs land use applIcatIOn IS
for the constructIOn of a new auto dealershIp. The applIcant plans on future phases on the property
wluch would allow an add1tJonal dealerslup and an office/warehouse for parts dIstributIOn. The future
phases wlll be reviewed at a later date through the Final Development Plan process.
See applIcant's explanatIOn of the request.
II. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
The property m question is comprised of two parcels contaming a total of 10.59 acres. It IS located on
the eastern Side of Parfet Street and extends over to Oak: Street. The property was rezoned from C-l,
CommerCial-One and A-I, Agnculture-One to Planned Commercial Development pursuant to Case
No WZ-05-05
The property IS relat1vely flat, has a house and several outbuildmgs on the very northern part. An open
ditch (Wadsworth Ditch) runs along the north Side of these buildmgs. Two additIOnal open channel
d1tches (Bayou and Swadley) traverse the southern end of the property
Abuttmg the property to the north IS a smgle famlly reSidence zoned A-I and the detentIOn area for the
Hoss Planned Industnal Development. Although thiS detentIOn area will serve the mdustnal
development to the north, 1t IS also zoned A-I The L & K Industnal Park Planned Industnal
Development abuts the property on the east, as does the 70 West lndustnal Park Wh1Ch IS also zoned
Pill To the south IS a tnangular stnp of land zoned C-2 and A-I Wh1Ch has two billboards on It. Tlus
parcel separates the subject property from the north 1-70 Frontage Road. The ongmal dealershIp of the
Medved Autoplex IS located to the west, across Parfet Street.
III. PROPERTY HISTORY
The followmg IS a bnef hIStOry of the Medved Autoplex h1StOry which includes property located at
11001 W 1-70FrontageRoadNorth(Chevrolet,Hummer,Cadlllac), 11201 W 1-70FrontageRoad
North (Chrysler, Plymouth, Jeep and preVIOusly-owned vehicles) and vacant property on the east Side
ofParfet Street whIch IS subject to thIs development apphcatlOn.
The property (all three ongInal parcels) was rezoned from Agnculture-One to Commercial-One
pursuant to Case No. WZ-86-1O The rezomng encompassed all three parcels and mcluded a condition
that pnor to any development, a site plan approval process be completed in front ofPlanrnng
CommiSSIOn and C1ty CounCIl. A two-lot subdlv1s1on was approved wluch dIvided the property on the
west SIde of Parfet mto rn'o parcels (Case No MS-86-3). A slte plan was approved for the Chevrolet
dealershIp (11001 W 1-70 Frontage Road North) w1th a spec1al use permIt to allow major automotlve
repaIr (Case No, SUP-86-1O)
Planning CommiSSIOn
WZ-05-llfMS-05-04
2
In 1994, the owner applIed for a planned buildmg group plan to establ1sh an mtenm used car sales
operatiOn on the westerly parcel (11201 W 1-70 Frontage Road) The mtenm site plan allowed for a
25' x 55' modular bUlldmg to serve as a sales office. The northern half of the site was proposed as a
test track for Hummer testmg.
In 1998, the applIcant applIed for an amendment to the recorded planned bUlldmg group for 11201 W
1-70 Frontage Road to allow constructIOn of two bUlldmgs contammg a total of 98,000 square feet of
buIldmg area, An additIOnal bUIlding With 9000 square feet of area was proposed on the north end of
the property. This bUlldmg was mtended to serve as a child care facilIty for employees. A 10' milit-
h ~
of-way vacatIOn also occurred for West 50t Avenue wluch was dedicated back to the property owner
In 1999, the dealershIp was cited for havmg illegal vehIcle storage on the vacant property on the east
Side of Parfet. In response to the citatIOn, an applIcatIOn was subrrutted for approval of a temporary
use permit to allow temporary vehIcle storage. The request was demed by the Board of Adjustment on
December 9, 1999
The applicant filed SUIt With the Jefferson County Dlsmct Court against the City of Wheat Ridge and
the Board of Adjustment. The court upheld the deCISIOn of the Board of Adjustment.
On July 25, 2005, the Wheat Ridge City Council approved a zone change to PCD and an Outlme
Development Plan for the subject property.
IV. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The Outlme Development Plan (ODP), wluch accompanies a rezomng ordmance, sets the allowable
uses and development standards for the property. Typically the Outlme Development Plan IS general
m nature and serves as the bluepnnt for development of the property. The Outlme Development Plan
IS also used to establish deSign parameters mcludmg maXIlllum buildmg height, mInimum landscaped
coverage and mlmmum penmeter setbacksmXJli1li-mW;~~Jllji1~T~
The proposed FInal Development Plan encompasses the southern two-thirds of the site and IS proposed
for a new vehicle dealership (Hummer) ~dS~~1IT~~ A temporary
retentIOn pond IS beIng shown to accommodate storm water until the off-sIte property acqUlsltJon and
constructIOn occurs for thiS portIOn of the Columbme BasIn. The property owner's agent IS in the
process of acqumng the property from the State Land Board. ThiS could take SIX months to a year to
complete. Upon constructIOn of the detentIOn pond and off-Site Improvements, an addll10nal
dealership may be requested which would be located where the north end of the retentIOn pond is
currently shown. An FDP amendment would be required for the new dealership. See SectIOn VI. for
more detail.
Allowable uses:
Permitted uses on the approved ODP mcluded auto sales and rental, warehousmg and parts distribution
and repan and detailIng, test dnvmg and general office, service and retaIl uses. The proposed Final
Development Plan IS beIng proposed to allow a new dealershIp (Hummer), The site plan includes a
vehicle demonstratIOn area for test dnvmg these vehIcles. It IS located between the bUlldmg and the
retentIOn pond. Staff has requested additIOnal InformatIOn regardmg the use, mamtenance and
Planning Comrmssion
WZ.05-11i?vlS-05-04
3
management oftlus area. This mformatJon wIll be provIded when the dealershIp IS built and thIS area
IS Installed.
Structure Design:
The new dealerslup buildmg IS 8889 s.f., IS 33' tall and IS oriented toward Parfet Street. Proposed
arclutectural matenals Include smooth and rough-faced block, bnck, and a stone fayade treatment
around the structure entrance. Staff concludes that the proposed structure deSIgn IS consistent wnh the
CIty'S architectural deSign gUIdelInes.
Wall SIgnS are shown on the east and west elevatlOns. Two freestandmg SIgnS are proposed, a
monument SIgn at the entrance and a hIghway onented SIgn 50' m heIght to the southeast of the
structure A future 50' lugh francluse SIgn IS shown west ofthe pylon SIgn for tlus dealershIp A note
has been added that tlus SIgn cannot be used until an addItlOnal dealerslup IS approved through an
amended FDP process.
Landscaping:
The mImmum landscaped coverage required by the ODP is 20%. On the site data breakdown,
nwnbers were proVIded for percent coverage m this phase of 49.1 %. TIns figure mcludes the formal
landscaped areas, the vehIcle demonstratIon area and the retentIOn pond. The 20% ODP mIrumum for
the entIre 10 acres must be met WIth any future development phases.
Street trees WIth 3" calIper are shown m tree lawns along both the Parfet and Oak Street frontages for
thIS phase. All mmImum landscape quantltles reqUIred per Section 26-502 have been met.
Access:
A single access pomt IS shown on both Parfet Street and Oak Street with a dnve alsle connectIOn
between the two, These access pomts alIgn with the eXIstmg southern curb cut on the dealership to the
west.
Parking:
One of the major Impacts of the dealerslup has been parkmg. The Zoning and Development Code
reqUIres that commerCIal developments proVIde all parkmg for customers, employees and Inventory
on-SIte. In each of the prevIOus land use approvals for the dealershIp, the Issue of cars parkmg on
Parfet Street was addressed. DISCUSSIOn and resultant condItIons approval dunng the 1999 process
specified that parkmg could occur on Parfet Street only dunng constructlOn of the newest dealerslup.
The most recent mspectlOn showed 52 vehIcles parked along Parfet. A condItlon of approval of the
zone change and ODP was that employee parkmg for all three parcels IS to be accommodated on SIte
and that there would be no exceptlOns.
As such, StaffreqUlred a parkmg study WIth the FDP and plat submIttal~~s.::~
Staff has reVIewed the attached analysIs and concludes that Ifthe numbers used for total number of
employees IS correct, that the analYSIS IS credible. AddItlOnal phases of development on thIS parcel
must prOVIde adequate parlong for employees,- dIsplay and mtenor building space.
Planmng COnumSSlOIl
WZ-05-11/MS-05-04
4
Development Standards:
The followmg development standards are depicted on the ODP. The proposed development and any
future development of the site must comply WIth these standards.
I R OD I P
I Item eauired bv P ronded bv FDP I
Building & Hard Surfaced 80% 52.9%
Coverage
Minimum Setbacks 50' from r-o-w if parking, 30' ,
I Front: from r-o-w ifIandscaped (west Front. 97'
and east) SIdes, 184' and 492'
Sides: 15' from external and mternal Rear: 344'
property hnes (south)
Rear: 30' from single farmly homes
(north)
Min. Landscaped Coverage 20% 47.1 % of tills phase
:\'lin. Parking Required Refer to SectIOn 26-501 of the Meets the standards of Section
WheatR.1dge 26-501
Code of Laws for addItIOnal
reQUlrements
Max. Building Height 50' 33'
Sign age Refer to ArtIcle VIl of the One monument and one
Wheat R.1dge Code of Laws hIghway onented SIgn are
perrmtted
Fencing \ Refer to SectIOn 26-603 of the Meets the standards of SectIOn
Wheat R.1dge Code of Laws 26-603
Exterior Lighting Refer to SectIon 26-503 of the Meets the standards of SectIOn
WheatR.1dge 26-503
Code of Laws
I Architectural Detail I Refer to the Streets cape and ConsIstent WIth Streetscape and
Archztectura[ Desi~n Alanua[ ArchItectural DeSIgn Manual
Staff concludes that the proposed development standards are generally consIstent WIth those
established by the approved Outlme Development Plan. All reqUIrements for a Planned CommercIal
Development Flllal Development Plan have been met.
V. FI~AL PLAT
The property IS currently comprised of two parcels. The applIcant IS requestmg approval of a
ldt fth I I ~_"o!-~
conso I a Ion 0 e OIS mto one parce . li.!~i!&!.l,I~~Jw!Qll.gp~ " " a'
Planrung CommissIOn
WZ-05-11IMS-05-04
5
The plat estabhshes typIcal utIlIty easements around the penmeter. A blanket access easement IS
provIded by note #3
30' of nght-of-way IS bemg dedIcated for Oak Street. Staff IS suggesting that 30' of right-of-way be
dedicated for W 50t!'. Avenue. The ap~hcant does not concur WIth tills dedIcation. See Staffs
dIscussIOn of the unportance of the 50t Avenue extensIOn m SectlOn VII. of thIs report. If 50th
Avenue IS reqUIred to be dedIcated, modIficatIOns to the easements on the north side must occur,
The permanent stormwater detentIOn easement IS show with the appropnate mamtenance note (#4)
All regulatIOns and standards of ArtIcle IV of the Code of Laws have been met.
VI. REGIONAL DRAINAGE ISSUES
There are concerns of development of thIS property regardmg regIOnal dramage. ThIS property IS
located WIthIn the ColumbIne BaSIn Dramage Outfall plan area, Accordmg to the plan adopted by
Urban Dramage and Flood Control DIStnct, there are conveyance facihtles shown runrung north along
Oak Street to W 50th Avenue and extendmg over to Parfet Street. An addItIonal conveyance faclhty
would run adpcent to the Xcel Energy easement on the south SIde of the parcel. The Arvada channel
IS reqUlred off-SIte followmg the old raIlroad nght-of-way from Parfet Street east to Miller Street.
ThIs old nght-of-way IS currently owned by the State Land Board.
The deSIgn proposed shows an open channel runrung along the north side of the subject property in an
easement. A total of 80' ofnght-of-way IS needed to accommodate the open channel. The eXlstmg
FDP and plat show a 40' easement. The remamder of thIs easement WIll have to be acqUIred from
property to the north. IfW. 50th Avenue IS dedIcated and bUIlt, It will dIsplace the area shown as
channel. If the street IS built, the channel WIll have to be accommodated In a box culvert whIch wIll be
very expensIve to bUIld or shIfted south into the future development phase A total of 80' of easement
m addltlon to the 30' for 50th would be requued. Although the channel deSIgn WIll not Impact the
southern part of the property (thIS phase), It Will affect the developabihty of the northern portlOn. All
of the dramage Improvements noted above must be completed WIth thIS proposed phase of
development. m~itnilt~tmu~lli~.JiUl
VII. WEST 50TH AVENUE
The Issue of extensIOn of Vv' 50th Avenue has been debated SInce the ongmal parcel on the west SIde
ofParfet was platted. W. 50th Avenue currently extends from MIller to Oak Street, east of the subject
parcel and from Robb Street east where It dead-ends Into a cul-de-sac on 11201 W. 1-70 Frontage
Road North (western Autoplex parcel)
1986:
In the mId-1980's, an amendment was made to the Major Streets Plan of the ComprehenSIve Plan.
Tlus amendment deSIgnated an artenal street com dol' between K1plmg Street and Ward Road. SInce
50th was a lOgIcal extenSIon, 40' of nght-of way was dedIcated for 50th Avenue as part of the two-lot
subdiVISIOn approval on the parcel on the west SIde ofParfet m 1986
Planning Comrrusslon
WZ-05.llfMS.05-04
6
1994:
Dunng the 1994 Planned Buildmg Group approval for an mtenm used car sales operatIon on 11201
W. 1-70 Frontage Road North, the applIcant ind1cated that he felt It was premature to develop 50th
Avenue at the trrne. but would be wl!lmg to part1c1pate when the time was appropnate. A condItIOn of
C1ty Council approval was that W. 50th be constructed on both sectIOns of the Medved property when
a bUlldmg penmt for the \\ estern parcellS 1ssued.
1998:
As part of the PBG revIew for a permanent dealerslup on 11201 W 1-70 Frontage Road, street
construction plans for 50th Avenue were revIewed and 11 was md1cated that these Improvements should
be completed on both lots connectmg to Parfet pnor to Issuance of a C 0 The street extensIOn was
needed as the plan relied on 50th Avenue for the unloadmg ofveh1cles on the north end. The plan was
appro\ed by Clly Councl! on July 13 but was reconsIdered at the next meetmg (July 27) The
reconsIderatIOn allowed constructIOn of a cul..de-sac off 50th on the north s1de of the property (in lieu
of full street extensIOn) WIth the vacatIon of the southern 10' of that nght-of-way Further, that the
deSIgnatIOn for 50th be changed from an artenal to a collector and that 50th Avenue would only be
completed if and when the res1dentlal propert1es to the east on Parfet are developed for mdustnal or
commercIal uses
2000:
The new ComprehenSIve Plan 1S adopted. The connectIOn of 50th Avenue between Parfet and Oak
Street IS deleted on the Roadway ClassIficatIOn Map.
2003:
Dunng the final development plan and plat heanngs for Case No W2-03-08 (Hoss PID), Public
Works requested a 25' WIde dedIcatIon for 50th Avenue extendm~ west from Oak Street. The purpose
was to reserve one-half of the nght-of-way WIdth m the event sot IS extended from Oak Street to
Parfel. ThIS condItIOn was not mcluded m the motion for approval and no nght-of-way dedIcatIOn
occurred,
2005:
Dunng the public heanngs for the zone change on the subject property, Staff made recommendatIOns
to both Planmng Commlss10n and CIty CounCIl that nght-of-way for W 50th Avenue be dedIcated
between Oak and Parfet Streets, At the May 19, 2005 Planmng CommISSIon publIc heanng the
follOWIng condlllOn was Included In the motIon of approval "Applicant shall be reqUlred to proVIde
30 feet ofnght-of-way or easement for West 50th Avenue extensIOn on the north property lme and/or
draInage purposes. ThIS Issue shall be resolved pnor to or concurrent WIth the final development plan
and final piat." At the July 25, 2005 CIty CouncIl publIc heanng, thIS cond11lOn was not mcluded m
the zone change motIOn for approval.
In response to adoptIOn of the NeIghborhood ReVItalizatIOn Study, Winston ASSOCIates was retamed to
work WIth staff In the creatIOn of three subarea plans. One of the subareas beIng conSIdered IS the
northwest area m the cIty WIth boundanes generally from W 52nd Avenue to the north 1-70 Frontage
Road and Ward Road to Tabor Street TranSIt Onented DeSIgn (TOD) IS bemg explored due to
RTD's planned lIght raIl transIt stop for the Goldlme in the vlclmty of Ward Road and W 50th Pl.Jce,
Planning CommissIOn
WZ-05-11/1vlS-05-04
7
The mtent of TOD IS to encourage pedestnan activity through the use of street gnds whIch m turn
Impact the type, form and qualIty of commercIal development. At the most recent subarea plan
meetmg held on ] anuary 24, maps were shown with the extension of 50th Avenue from Ward east to
Tabor and beyond. Not only IS the extensIOn of50lh Avenue essential to proVide a secondary access
route through tills mdustrial area but also to provIde the eastJwest gnd connectIOns for TOD
Although the proposed subarea plan clrculatlOn plans are not adopted, Staff will recommend that they
mclude the 50th Avenue through connectlOn. ~~~
BeSIdes the north 1-70 Frontage Road, there are no other east/west road connections between K1plIng
and Ward Road. 50th Avenue bet\veen Klpling and Miller was recently constructed as part of the
Arvada RIdge commerCial development. 50th Avenue between Miller and Oak Streets IS already
completed, as IS portIOn east from Robb Street to the northwest comer of the eastern Medved lot With
unbuilt nght-of-way extendmg from the temporary cul-de-sac east to Parfet. AcqUlsltlOn oftlus
sectIOn of 50th between Parfet and Oak Streets would ensure the future completIOn of the east/west
connectIon between K1plmg and Ward Road.
VIII. AGE:'fCY REFERRALS
All affected service agencies were contacted regardmg the ability to serve the property. The developer
\\'111 be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development. Specific
referral responses follow
Aryada Fire Protection District: Will reqUire the mstallatlOn of additional hydrants. Emergency
access lanes shall be Signed as fire lanes. The bUlldmg Will be required to be spnnklered.
Ditch Companies: The affected ditch companIes have reVIewed changes to the current ditch
configurations. The applIcant must contmue workIng With them to resolve any Issues.
Valle) Watcr District: Valley Water Dlstnct has adequate capaCity to serve the pro] ect. AdditIOnal
water mam Imes, fire hydrants or fire spnnkler hnes may be needed.
Clear Creek Valley'" atcr and Sanitation District: The property owner must petitIOn to be
mcluded m the servIce dlstnct. The site can be served by a sewer maIn extensIOn.
Public Works Department: The Public Works Department has reviewed a dramage report. Public
Works recommends a 30' nght-of-way dedicatIOn occur for W 50th Avenue and that the draInage
system on the north end of the site be redeSigned to accommodate the street. If that occurs,
correspondmg changes must be to the FDP and plat documents.
Construction of the dramage faCIlIties on the entire site will be reqUired at the hme of constructlOn of
the Autoplex expansion. ThIs would mclude Improvements on the north end and constructlOn of the
off-Site Arvada channel. Until that occurs a temporary retentlOn pond will be permitted. The City
may assist Medved ill the constructlOn of the M'ada Channel by partlclpatmg in partial
reimbursement If necessary
Planrnng ComnusslOn
WZ-05-ll.'I\-1S-05-04
8
IX. SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Staff concludes that the proposed FDP IS consistent with the standards establIshed m the ODP and all
reqUlrements for a PCD Final Development Plan have been met. Therefore Staff gives a
recommendatlOn of approval with the condlt1ons listed m the suggested motlOn for approval
Option A:
"I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No WZ-OS-ll, a request for approval of a Fmal
Development Plan for property zoned Planned Commercial Development located at 4900 and 4990
Parfet Street for the followmg reasons,
I ProVlslOns for employee parkmg have been mcorporated mto the FDP.
2. The Final Development Plan IS consistent with the standards set forth m the approved Outlme
Development Plan for the sHe.
3 All rcquuements for a peD Final Development Plan have been met.
With the followmg condltlOns
1 The dramage system for the northern ~ortIon of the site be redeSigned to accommodate a
half-wIdth (30') dedIcatIon for W sot Avenue.
2. Poor to mstallatlOn of the vehIcle demonstratlOn testmg area, additIOnal mforn1atlon be
prOVIded regardmg the use, mamtenance and management of thIs area.
3 The applIcant contmue workmg with the ditch compames to resolve concerns poor to
Issuance of a bUlldmg permit.
4 The appl1cant contmue workmg wIth the Clear Creek Valley Water and SanltatlOn Dlstnct
for mclUSlOn mto the dlStnct for sanitary sewer purposes."
Option B:
"1 move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-05-11, a request for approval of a Final
Development Plan for property zoned Planned CommerCIal Development located at 4900 and 4990
Parfet Street for the followmg reasons
I
2.
3 "
FINAL PLAT
Staff concludes that all reqUlrements of the SubdIVISion RegulatlOns have been met therefore a
recommendatlOn of approval IS given with conditions listed belo\'<
Option A:
"1 move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No MS-OS-04, a request for approval of a final plat for
property zoned Planned CommerCIal Development located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street for the
followmg reasons
1. All reqUlrements of the SubdiVISion Regulauons have been met.
Planning COmID1ssion
WZ-05-IIIMS-05-04
9
2. Staff recommends approval.
WIth the followmg condItIons
1 30' ofnght-of-way be dedIcated for West 50th Avenue and the easements on the north end be
redefined to reflect reqUlred changes.."
Option B:
"1 move to recommend DENIAL of Case No, MS-05-04, a request for approval of a final plat for
property zoned Planned CommercIal Development located at 4900 and 4990 Parfet Street:
1.
2
~ "
-'
Planrung CommissIOn
WZ-05-II/MS.05-04
10
)
Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc.
September 30, 2005
Ms, MeredIth Reckert
Seruor Planner
CltV of Wheat RIdge
7500 West 29th Av~nue
\Vheat fudge, Colorado 80215
Re' Medved Autoplex
Dear Ms, Reckert:
Please find enclosed the followmg matenals related to the site design and development of
the Medved property'
1 ApphcatlOn Fonn - notarized
2 FInal Development Plan
. Techmcal Data
. Site Plan
. Landscape Plan
. Architectural ElevatIOns
. Llghtmg - Photometncs
. Slgnage
3 ConstructIOn Plans ~ Pnvate These drawmgs pertam to reqUIred engmeenng
Improvements on the subject property
4 Constructlon Plans - Public These drawmgs pertam to reqUIred engmeenng
Improvements off-sIte.
5 SubdiVISIOn Plat: We are plattmg the entire 10.59 acre property as a smgle parcel
The milIa] FDP submittal consists of 6 0 acres
6 ALTA Survev
7 FInal DraInage Study: In assoCIatIOn wah tills dramage study we are provldmg
caples of all draInage Improvement documents and "redlme" documents for return to
Urban DraInage and Flood Control Authonty
8 SubmIttal Fee. ProVided under separate cover IS a check for $5566 00 ThiS amount
was detennmed In the followmg manner'
FDP applicatIOn fee S50000
FDP acreage fee-$500/6 0 ac 3000,00
FDP pubhcatlOn fee 300,00
Sub Total $380000
MInor SubdiVISIOn ApplicatIOn fee
Mmor SubdlvlslOn fee-S200/6 0 ac
Mmor SubdiViSion pubhcatlOn fee
Sub Total
600 00
120000
150,00
$195000
283'; 'X'e.:>t Oxford Ave.. Ii\) Englewood, Colorado S\
EXHIBIT 1
773 . e-mail: mplandplan@aol.com
2
Overpayment Relmbursement $184.00
Total $5566.00
9 Parkmg Study: As prevIOusly requested to support on-sIte and off-SIte parkmg
reqUirements.
10 ArchItectural ConstructIOn Plans In an effort to provide mformation to you m an
orderly fashlOn, these plans can be antlcipated in mid-October. We hope that havmg
a complete submIttal for revIew will assist in expectmg necessary entitlements.
As you know, the complexity of thIs project IS unusual. The compleXIty IS dIrectly
related to reqUired off-SIte dramage improvements. The need for expediency from a
corporate standpoint IS also notIceable. This submittal conforms to our objectIves as
provIded to the CIty as early as Apnl of this year. We are requestmg that we be allowed
to develop the mltial dealerslup utilizmg a temporary retentIOn pond. Tlus submIttal
document those off-SIte improvements necessary to implement an on-site detentlOn pond
and proVIde an out-flow to the east. Both on-sIte and off-SIte Improvements need to
occur on a phased basis given market condItions, access to land owned by the State, and
general coordmatlOn wIth the numerous public and private agencIes. Tlus submIttal IS
our IrutJal attempt to address these compleXItIes. There will be numerous subsequent
submIttals m the future, We need to schedule meetmgs to evolve a SubdIvIsIOn
Improvement Agreement whereby oblIgatIons, tJmmg, finanCIal consideratIOns, and other
factors umque to this sltuatlOn can be defined.
Please let me know If I can do more at thIS tIme.
ff!la;o
MGP/las
c John Medved
DJana Blanch
Denrus Polk
Bruce McLennan
Wendell Ayers
Marshall FIshman
. < P HHP'o pre: ,0 HHlif IIliH ~
! I [s it'l (~ l~ . ~ 1
[ i 9.. t :: ~ ~ 10 ~
(~ ,. ~ <" i r le. g h!.~g
i ~ i'P~"t~ [. r () ,2": if rj~t ~
i ' h~oo !~] g !~ [J e l~;
, ~r~.t -~ S : r] g 1" -'." tHpo
, ~tr[(~ W"'-D1DAr'
l I q;' r~~ r~;;; ~~ 'il i 1 ~
I ;~ r1 Li ~ .1. !': n~ r; ;iL :.g .
r -or ;.!:!. l '" ~ l !I" g. ~llH '\ ,
l i ~;1 i ~ '. 8 I .
.' 0 HHdr ~ .
< :HI~ .. ~
~ !~~n~i ci ~ ~ j >
o ~ : c ~{.: a ~ r rth <
f:! U ~! H1 1 ~~ftl~ ,1h. UJ>Ui'lGJ:"
~~n ,~
'llfi;i I"~ ~f,.,~~: ifif
t;~fi I" t
~i(.Hi " mm ~ ! J i'
o:ni ,if l' ~IH ;~ .~~~,,~
~%- I ~;!~~i~ i 1110<
1 ~;;~[ r _.. r
~'" ' !r~ ~ ~ i" ~ !! f P;"C'"
~z I ~~~~i~i i <C ~ ~ ~j ~ i ~ g ~ i ,L. I I I
, . E~if; i " ~~ ~ ( r If le I
I ~..: i ' ~ i i"' ! .
, .
r I ~ H8
- ~ &. r.
":: ~ c
:-.. S
~ ~
l -
c
,
<
i
I
I
~I
!
I
!
1
't ~'
, ~
'0
, "
.~
~ ~ c'
, 5 ~
~: ~
~~ f
I f) g_
Is.
: ~ [ll 0
! ~ ~
s. ~ j '"
,
"
f'
~ :
0.,
S;;>
~ ~j
HI
t I
i
c
l'-~
fH~
i-~)o~
tit < 0
~ H;;:
~ go ~ .J
tJ: ~
dig
., -
~ [i g
.9t':
i ~t
lh
p-
iii
.t[
!h
jh
~rr
,g E, '~~~~'Ii; e'~~
~~ ~~ ~~,!"i'SI !:~e
t, ,. :ll~sho~ H
Ei 8~ "\:,',.~ =11
^i ~1 ~~iE~!~p~ ii~
!~ ':~a,s~lg ~~
,! ~;E~5!ii ='0
, ;'~\E!h .~
! 51~~i~,. ~,
, i',1!tH <.
~ !H~~~i~ 5"
~ ~I~~~i!~ .~
',',i,<'o ia
.'.. e-~ '"
~;~Iil~";l~~ =<';2
<;' :~r i!..,~;1 ;:! ~
mm'. 51
oS",,~i ,.
1;~~~;i~ll!i~li!!il!1 I;I~~~
:o~~",o.-.,..-, c,! "0' ~
~~~~~~. ';'~m~~.~~~~~=~ ~~E~ ~
l,~~~el;! 1""ieiaOi @,,; t
"!"!~~"!!"o,,~, ~i'! 8
5,":i~'"~i,:.!!~gE" ,.,.
ii~~'iii~,~~~:!~~!!~ e;ii
!!~~!\~i!;!~~ii~~!\! ~~i:
-Iii ,I~!.~~' ::E~.. ~I~!
~i~~!!;~i!!~~!!~g:!; ~!:l
!:'~~i!\i~I~"'~'~'~ ~=\
.l5~'SoE5 ,,5l~!i~il .\~
S~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~C~~~ ~;~
!l.g\l~o!l,i~'1~~;'1 ~l;
.ii~5.~~!i!~~l!,~!i; Iii
-\i-~,< _*
. II". ,,\~,,,
\ ':' ~".. - "
~\\,", ,~ H* II
! ~~:\ ' ~, ~-~
" ,~ ~~ '; /
W .~,\: " ~
," :j,
" \ /"
~ ~.\ li ~~ / ~
~\\ I I ,'I~ %
.;,~ I \~ ,.; __
, \,; I,? ~
~
iji
,
~F( d
~ p: ::.;
de:
i .;r ~ "'-"
?:~ ~
L,.i~ ~
!.' ~
~ i ~ 3""
~ ~ ~
,I r....
1 'c-
~i ~,
I ~~
! lO
, .
5 .
~i
i
!
"ni;;
Hmt
i;~n [
~;~Jts
;lm~
101: ,
i; ~!!
"~~i
Hih
;;-fg,!H.
lfiji
;Ii!
I"
. rl
1
mi i~ im ~m I~~ UH mi flU
- ~~i: :~~ ~.~ ~~~ ~t ~~~
~i ; I 1~' [ill~ i!!
, .
:2;~~
..,
"00"\)I,~'.W6)J71!'
H7\l'"
P&rf~!5~CI!__
- -~--:
'o:'" I "f:'S :
\ll' ----- ' "~" '
.; ~, I
{ ~
,,;;.-
, :z::z 5'_~
1'i;; f ~c
~; g.g.
~I~ ~~
~:~ ~~ *------
:;J - r'
t. ,-' .,
'!! I l' il
! ~ " -----......
*,; I
~
6
~~~~
i:-:i
*
:~I
!I~
!r;
r~----- ~-
ii* ~>~
--~:r _~~~
f"..:' ...~
,....t:31
~"::?-' ...;;
b
~
( i
!
,
.
i
!
;
r
I ! I I I
r~ .~ -if ~~1~1~ I
,7 if !~~ ii-..! f
;,~ ,; ~~~ ,.,,!-
~; 0;:; 8~ ~ Il'!~l..l
.: !~ fff [~~~!~
t ;- i q =. ~ ~1 f ~ i ~
f -, ij H .,Wn ..
I ~ ~ t i ~! t ; ~j
~ t ~ ~ /;! f f~ ~
~ , i. f .l ~
r ~ i !i i
f ;;:
r
H
~.g
~
"
1~1~~9
iiP~1i
, t!H"
'] Co ~
fllH
h"!H
~ 1.1;
~ pr~
f ~iH
I g'r.
"
EXHIBIT 2
o
::
-
-
-.
:::
>(:
;po
ri (!l
~~
c rc
-
rO
5'"0
~a
,
c rtl
R ::
2.......
0"'" _
-,->J
~;::l _
:::r..... "'..
n::::r--
0' ('0 ::
&VJ
_0
,~ c
:s::;- >
.; g ....
(1'" ....
~'tO 0
o c __
-,1'; ~
:::E~ n
::r 0 .... ~
("C--.~ __
~S---~
~~ 0 S
g. 0 rtl (D
.('0 S. ~ Q.
Q~ ~ n
c ~ 0 0
;::l~_
~ to \oJ ;3
o g; a a
::: ~ r? (D
~~ = l-1
NO ....... 8.
~~-o =-
_ r: __
.:-' U ~ U
~i3 :: (D
;:c.;::l <
o ........ ~. (D
o ,0'<:: ...-
-'-:; 0
() c' - '"0
5-~ :r a
..., '" r? 0
t!:T_::l
0"0\1_
w -.
VJ"""
0"<
c
S-O
'""-'l
~~
(JQ -
('0 ....
O'rc
\O~
:::E-
~ ~
.r- _.
Q.
CTeI
rtl
~
(D
Q.
<
(D
c..,
n I
::::r I
(D ,
<
""l
o
...-
(D
-
!.!' I
if ;
II '
II ,
,
Michael G. Pharo Associates, Inc.
February 16, 2006
Ms. MeredIth Reckert
Semor Planner
CIty of Wheat RIdge
7500 West 29th Avenue
\\ 'beat R..1dge, Colorado 80215
Re Medved Rezomng - Case No WZ-05-11
bear Ms, Reckert.
The purpose of thIs letter IS to provide a response to the condItIOns of approval Imposed
by the Plannmg COITUTIlSSlOn for the above referenced case.
')
Our positIOn remams the same on the \\7est 50th Avenue Issue. We do not accept
thIs conditIOn. The request for a 31) foot dedicatIOn IS for a road that we do not
need for vehIcular access, the eXIstence of a R.O W reserve or road IS a secunty
lIabIlJty, there IS no mdlcatlOn that the City can readIly obtam other portIOns of
the R.O W due to ownership and junsdlctlOn Issues, there IS no timetable for
ImplementatIOn of the road - If e\ er, and we are already provldmg considerable
publIc land for the area-wide dramage faCIlIty
We accept the condJtlOn to proVIde detaIls of the vehIcle demonstratIOn area pnor
to constructIOn.
\\'e accept the conditIOn to contmue \\ orklng wJth the dJtch company
'Ne accept the conditIOn to contmuc working WIth the Clear Creek Water and
SanItatIon Dlstnct.
\\7 e do not accept the condl tlon to alter our parkmg program because the
conditIOn IS not based upon ObjectIve cntena. The number of employees at the
proposed dealershIp IS lImited due to the small sIze of the facIlIty, employees are
to be transferred from the exlstmg dealership to the proposed faCIlIty, the number
of spaces proVIded IS based upon accepted cntena as documented In numerous
jUnSdIctlOns m the metro area, and there wIll be no parts sales or servIce
proVided at the proposed facllll: -\11 aenal photo mterpretatlon and actual
counts on Parfet Street have concluded the need to prOVIde parkmg for 50
employees ThIS numher was reVIewed and accepted by your office as
appropnate as part of our parkmg study To arbJtranly deSIgnate an addItIOnal 25
spaces for employees \\ ho do not eXIst would remove the abIlIty to store 25
mventory cars. Fmally, as part of future FDP submIttals for zoned and approved
,
,)
4
5
:2'35 \\est Oxford ,,\enue, 0(, EnQle",ood, C"ior3do' ohone: 3031783-3772' fax "13:783-3773'
ATTACHMENT 2
Ms. Reckert
February 16,2006
Page 2
facihtIes on the property, we WIll have the ability to adjust the parkmg/storage
spaces as may be warranted.
Thanks for your contmued efforts on tills proJect.
Smcerely,
t<,hchael G Pharo
MGP'las
c John Medved
DIana Blanch
Denms Polk
Bruce McLennan
Wendell Ayers
\~
'- '/
""
-""=
\ I '
!. \\, ~ 10l
! />
- ,
I~ ~:.... ~- }~,
" \,
., -,
&.
, ...
<--------->--- ~
,
I
,~<: I
... ,
r-
" ' ,
\ ,
- \.--:
!
I
I
'"
'c
( '-.--,~
/--'-
'~~
@O.3~
:ACc~SS
~ ,
,,'~'
-
.~
.- - ~ '-- :----.
-~../ .r~:.>., " /'\. ,," ''-','''';:-'
"6 - . of:] 0 ".' ~
" - - - -"- - r-----. r-----..
", (] .~---,--..- r,~ '------.J' .-
- - n .,., , ~ '__........... _ l
EXHIBIT 7
"""-~
~
~
J
ITEMNO ~
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
~.!
c:r"i;;
-1: .j
~'.5
,
COUNCIL MEETING DATE
February 27,2006
TITLE:
COUNCIL BILL NO. 05-2006: AN ORDINANCE AMENDIl\'G
CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS
PERTAINING TO REFERENCES TO THE STREETS CAPE
AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN MANUAL
D PUBLIC HEARING
D BIDSIMOTIONS
D RESOLUTIONS
~ ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date Feb 27,2006)
D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
QuasI-Judicial D
~~
~
No
Commumty Development Director
~.
.~-q
City Ma er .j
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
In February of 200 I, the City of Wheat Ridge adopted the Streetscape and Architectural DeSign
Manual as a regulatIOn and supplement to the Zomng and Development code. SectIOn 2 o of the
manual relates speCifically to archltectural standards m the Clty of Wheat RIdge which pertam to
reqUIrements regardIng fa<,:ade deslgn, screenmg ofmechamcal eqmpment and acceptable
archltectural matenals.
These archllectural standards are reqmred to be met for the development of any property wlthm the
ArchItectural DeSIgn Overlay Dlstnct which IS defined as all properties wlth NC, RC, C-l C-2, I
and PD zonIng,
The IndlVldual zone dlstnct development standards m Chapter 26 do not reference the reqmred
streetscape and architectural standards. The proposed ordInance adds a reference to the Streetscape and
ArchItectural Manual m each of the affected zomng dlstnct development standards.
PlannIng CommissIOn reviewed the proposed ordInance at a publIc heanng held on December 1,
2005 A recommendatIon of approval was gIVen.
publIcatIon."
Or,
"I move to table mdefimtely Council Bill No. 05-2006, Case No ZOA-05-04. an ordmance amendmg
Chapter 26 of the Wheat RIdge Code of Laws pertammg to references to the Streetscape and
Architectural DesIgn Manual."
Report Prepared by' MeredIth Reckert, 303-235-2848
RevIewed by' Alan WhIte
Attachments.
1 December 1, 2005 Planmng CommISSIOn memo
2. CouncIl BIll No, 05-2006
Request tor City Council ActIOn-report form
3
City of Wheat Ridge
Community Development Department
Memorandum
TO: ~anmng ComrmsslOn
FROM: (Meredith Reckert
SUBJECT: Case No. ZOA-05-04/Cross references
DA TE: November 22, 2005
Attached 1S staff's recommended language to allow for cross-references between the commerCIal
zone distnct regulatIOns and the Streetscape and Architectural Design gmdelmes,
In February of 2001, the City of Wheat Ridge adopted the Streetscape and Architectural Design
Manual as a regulation and supplement to the Zonmg and Development code SectIOn 2.0 of the
manual relates speCIfically to architectural standards in the City of Wheat Ridge which pertain to
requirements regarding fa<;ade design, screening of mechamcal equipment and acceptable
architectural matenals.
These architectural standards are required to be met for the development of any property withm the
ArchItectural DeSign Overlay Dlstnct which is defined as all properties with NC, RC, C-l C-2, I and
PD zonmg
The mdlvldual zone distnct development standards m Chapter 26 do not reference the required
streetscape and architectural standards. The proposed ordmance adds a reference to the Streetscape
and Architectural Manual in each of the affected zonmg dIStrict development standards.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
"1 move that Case No ZOA-05-04, proposed amendments to various sections of Chapter 26 of the
Wheat Ridge Code of Laws referencmg the Streetscape and Architectural Design Manual, be
forwarded to City Council with a recommendatIOn of APPRO V AL for the followmg reasons.
I
The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted legislatIOn pertaining to the development
standards for the commercIal zone dlstncts;
The City of Wheat Ridge has adopted legislatIOn pertammg to streetscape and
architectural design guideltnes,
There are no cross references between the two different sets of standards."
')
3
ATTACHMENT 1
1
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 5. Section 26-220 Light Industnal Dlstnct (I), of the Wheat R1dge Code of
Laws IS hereby amended as follows
A. Intent and purpose. The mtent of this dlstnct is to permit the use of prevIOus
Industnal (I)-zoned property for commercial and l1ght mdustnal uses. Rezomng to
Industna1lI) Zone Dlstnct classification shall not be permitted, however, eXlstmg
Industnal (I)-zoned property may be developed and used m accordance With provIsions
set forth herem.
B Development standards
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streets cape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 6. Safetv Clause. The City of\Vbeat Ridge hereby finds, determmes, and
declares that thiS ordmance IS promulgated under the general polIce power of the City of Wheat
Ridge, that It IS promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the publ1c and that thiS
ordmance IS necessary for the preservatIOn of health and safety and for the protectIOn of publIc
convemence and welfare. The City Council further determmes that the ordmance bears a
ratIOnal relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attamed.
Section 7. SeverabllItv, If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zomng
code or the applIcation thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by
a court of competent JunsdlctlOn mvalId, such Judgment shall not affect appl1catlOn to other
persons or CIrcumstances.
Section 8. Supersession Clause, If any proVISion, reqUIrements or standard
established by thiS Ordmance IS found to conflIct With SImilar prOVISIOns, requlfements or
standards found elsewhere m the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are m
eXistence as of the date of adoptIOn of thiS Ordmance, the proVISions, reqUIrements and standards
here shall supersede and prevail
3
Section 9. EffectIve Date. This ordmance shall take effect 15 days after final
publIcatlOn.
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first readmg by a vote of to
m this day of , 2006, ordered publIshed m full m a newspaper
of general ClrculatlOn m the City of Wheat fudge and PublIc Heanng and conslderatlOn on final
passage set for ,2006, at 7'00 o'clock p.m., m the Councll
Chambers, 7500 West 291h Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final readmg by a
vote of to , thiS day of , 2006
SIGNED by the Mayor on thiS
day of
,2006.
JERRY DITULLIO, MAYOR
ATTEST
Pamela Y Anderson, CIty Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY
GERALD DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY
1 ST publIcatIOn
2nd pubhcatIOn.
Wheat Ridge Transcnpt
EffectIVe Date
4
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER
Council Bill No. 05-2006
Ordinance No.
Series of 2006
TITLE: AN ORDINAt~CE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT
RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO REFERENCES TO THE
STREETSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN MANUAL
WHEREAS, the CIty of Wheat R.1dge has adopted legislatIOn pertammg to the
development standards for the commercIal zone dlstncts,
WHEREAS, the CIty of Wheat RIdge has adopted legIslatIOn pertammg to
streetscape and architectural deSIgn gUldelmes;
\VHEREAS, there are no cross references between the two dIfferent sets of
standards,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE, COLOR.\DO THAT:
Section 1. SectIOn 26-216 NeIghborhood CommercIal Dlstnct (NC) ofthe Wheat
RIdge Code of Laws IS hereby amended as follows
A Intent and purpose. ThIS dlstnct IS establIshed to provIde for a reasonably
compatible transItIOn between resIdentIal and more mtenslve commercIal land uses, It
provIdes for resldenlJal scale, nelghborhood-onented professIOnal offices and servIces
whIch, by theH nature and through deSIgn lImItatIOn, WIll promote neIghborhood stabIllly
and protect neIghborhood values and character The dlstnct also proVIdes lImIted
nClghborhood-onented retaIl uses by specIal use approvaL ThIS dlstnct was formerly
tItled the "Restncted CommercIal One (RC-l) Dlstnct," IS hereby renamed, and the tItle
of saId dlstnct IS hereby changed on the offiCIal zomng map
B Development standards.
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
ATTACHMENT 2
1
Section 2. SectIOn 26-217 Restncted CommerCIal Dlstnct (RC) of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws IS hereby amended as follows
A. Intent and purpose. This dlstnct IS establIshed to accommodate vanous types of
office uses performmg admmlstratlve, professIOnal and personal services, and to provide
for a lImited range ofretall uses which are neighborhood onented, It IS the mten! that
general retml uses that serve the commumty or regIOn, who1esalmg, warehousmg,
mdustnal, and uses which reqUire outSide storage or display be prohibited, smce these
uses are mcompatible With other uses m this dlstnct.
B Development standards.
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 3. Section 26-218 Commercial-One Dlstnct (C-1) of the Wheat Ridge Code
of Laws IS hereby amended as follows
A, Intent and purpose. ThiS dlstnct IS establIshed to proVide for areas With a Wide
range of commercial land uses 'W hlch I11clude office, general busmess, and retail sales and
service establ1shments ThiS dlstnct IS supported by the commumty and/or entIre regIOn.
B Development standards
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as ma} be amended from time to time.
Section 4. Section 26-219 Commercial-Two Dlstnct (C-2) of the Wheat RIdge Code of
Laws IS hereby amended as follows
A, Intent and purpose, ThIS dlstnct IS establIshed to proVide for areas WIth a Wide
range of commerCial land uses which mclude office, general busmess, more mtenslve
retml sales, wholesale busmesses, and I1ght manufactunng. Tills dlstnct generally
depends on the entire regIOn for the market area.
B Development standards
2
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER
Council Bill No. 05-2006
Ordinance No.
Series of 2006
~(
'--'l
. '\
',\J '''',
)
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT
RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO REFERENCES TO THE
STREETSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN MANUAL
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted legislation pertaining to the
development standards for the commercial zone districts,
WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted legislation pertaming to
streetscape and architectural deSign guidelines;
WHEREAS, there are no cross references between the two different sets of
standards;
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE, COLORADO THAT:
Section 1. Section 26-216. Neighborhood Commercial District (NC) of the Wheat
Ridge Code of Laws is hereby amended as follows.
A. Intent and purpose This district is established to prOVIde for a reasonably
compatible transition between residential and more intensive commercial land uses. It
proVIdes for residential scale, neighborhood-oriented profeSSIOnal offices and servIces
which, by their nature and through design limitation, Will promote neIghborhood stablhty
and protect neIghborhood values and character. The district also provides limited
neIghborhood-oriented retail uses by special use approval. This district was formerly
titled the "Restricted Commercial One (RC-l) District," is hereby renamed, and the title
of saId district is hereby changed on the official zoning map.
B. Development standards
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 2. Section 26-217 Restncted Commercial District (RC) of the Wheat Ridge
Code of Laws is hereby amended as follows.
A. Intent and purpose This distnct IS established to accommodate various types of
office uses performmg administrative, professional and personal services, and to provide
for a limited range of retail uses which are neighborhood oriented. It is the intent that
general retail uses that serve the commumty or region, wholesaling, warehousing,
industrial, and uses which require outside storage or display be prohibited, since these
uses are mcompatible wIth other uses III this district.
B. Development standards.
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 3. SectIOn 26-218. Commercial-One District (C-1) of the Wheat Ridge Code
of Laws is hereby amended as follows:
A. Intent and purpose This district IS established to provide for areas with a wide
range of commercial land uses which include office, general business, and retail sales and
service establishments. This district IS supported by the community and/or entire region.
B Development standards,
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 4. Section 26-219. Commercial-Two District (C-2) of the Wheat Ridge Code of
Laws IS hereby amended as follows:
A. Intent and purpose. This distnct is established to proVIde for areas wIth a wide
range of commercial land uses which include office, general business, more intensive
retail sales, wholesale businesses, and I1ght manufactunng. This district generally
depends on the entlfe regIOn for the market area.
B Development standards.
2
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 5. Section 26-220. Light Industnal Distnct (I). of the Wheat Ridge Code of
Laws is hereby amended as follows.
A. Intent and purpose The intent of this district IS to pen11lt the use of previous
Industrial (I)-zoned property for commercial and light industrial uses. Rezoning to
Industnal (1) Zone District classification shall not be permitted; however, existing
Industrial (I)-zoned property may be developed and used m accordance with proviSions
set forth herein.
B Development standards,
12. Streetscape and Architectural Design Guidelines: See Streetscape and
Architectural Design Manual, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 6. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determmes, and
declares that this ordmance IS promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat
Ridge, that it IS promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this
ordmance IS necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public
convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordmance bears a
rational relatIOn to the proper legislative object sought to be attained.
Section 7. Severabihtv. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning
code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by
a court of competent jurisdictIOn invahd, such Judgment shall not affect application to other
persons or circumstances.
Section 8. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirements or standard
established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or
standards found elsewhere m the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in
eXistence as of the date of adoptIOn of this Ordinance, the proVisions, requirements and standards
here shall supersede and prevail
3
Section 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final
publicatIon. . ;_
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of ~ to
In thIs day of , 2006, ordered publIshed 1D full in a newspaper
of general circulation in the City of Wheat RIdge and Public Heanng and consideration on final
passage set for H ^ \<.. \. ~\ ~3 ,2006, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., 1D the CouncIl
Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat RIdge, Colorado
o
/"", l( '-
, \....' \ \
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a '.f .....{
vote of to , this day of , 2006. I ( i \
SIGNED by the Mayor on this
day of
,2006
JERRY DITULLIO. MAYOR
ATTEST.
Pamela Y Anderson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY
GERALD DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY
1 ST publication.
2nd publication.
Wheat RIdge Transcript
Effective Date:
4
ITEM NO: S,
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
COl.JNCn.. ,,-lEETING DATE:
February 27,2006
TITLE:
COUl\'CIL BILL XO. 06-2006: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING
FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-2,
RESIDEl\'TIAL-TWO TO PLANNED COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLIl\"E
DEVELOPMEl\T PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7495
W. 29th AVENUE (CASE NO. WZ-OS-IO)
o PUBLIC HEARNG
o BIDS\fOTIONS
o RESOLUTIONS
~ ORDL'JANCES FOR 1ST REf\DING (Februaf! 2"7.2006)
o ORDINA..:"\'CES FOR 2i\TI READING
QuasI-JudIcIal [gJ
Yes
~ din:- ~
o
No
CommUnIty Development Director
12~ '
~"L 0-----
City Mana r '\
EXEC1;nVE SV\1\lARY:
The applicant requests approval of a zone change from R-2, ReSldenl1al- Two to Planned Commercial
Development {PCD) and for approval of a PCD Outlme Development Plan for property located at
7495 W 29th Avenue
The Outlme Development Plan accompames the rezonmg ordmance and sets allowable uses and
development standards It IS general m nature and ser. es as a baSIC bluepnnt for development of the
property A final development plan and plat would have to be approved at a future date pnor to any
development occumng on the property
ThiS case IS scheduled for a Planmng CommIsSIOn public heanng on March 16,2006
ThiS City CounCil actIon IS related to Goal 2 of the StrategIc Plan of planmng for growth and
opportunItles. it IS also related to ~1ZS strategies of promotmg development of the Wadsworth
comdor by provldmg destmatlOn relad busmesses, an expanded tax base and mcreased property
values.
C01W\IISSION/BOARD RECOl\1l\1El'IDA nON:
ThIS case was ongmally scheduled for a Plannmg CommIssIon pubhc heanng on February 2.
2006 It was contmued until March 16, 2006 No actIOn was taken by Plannmg CommIssIOn at
the February 2 meetmg due to the contInuance
STATE\JE~T OF THE ISSUES:
The PlannIng CommIssIon pubhc hearing for the zone change and ODP request was contInued so
that the desIgn for the property could be modJiied. It IS the apphcant's mtent that the eXIstIng
house (manslOn) and possibly the chapel be Incorporated Into the plan, as well as the pergola. If
the zone change IS appro\ ed, the remamdcr of the structures on Ihe property would be offered for
relocatIOn to any Interested party lfnot relocated, the structures would be demolished and the
remamder of the sIte would be developed for commercial uses IncludIng retaIl, office, restaurant,
and neIghborhood serVIce estabhshments. NegotIations regardIng the structures on the property
are stIll takmg place between staff, the property owner and the Wheat RIdge Hlstoncal SOCIety
AL TER.'\'A TlVES CONSIDERED:
Do not approve the zone change. As recommended by the CIty Attorney, demal should occur only at
second readmg, as mdefimtely tablIng the ordmance on first readmg demes the apphcant due process.
FINANCIAL DIPACT:
A one lIme reVle\\ fee was collected for the processmg of thIs applicatIOn. AddltlOna] reVle\\ fees wlll
be reqUIred for the processIng of the final development plan and plat and bUIldIng permIt. Sales tax
revenues mJY be generated If the property IS rezoned for retall uses. Use tax w1l1 also be collected 011
any bUlldmg matenals.
RECO:\IMENDED MOTIONS:
"1 move to approve on first readmg Councll B1II No 06-2006, Case No \\'Z-05-10, a request for
approval of a zone change from R-2, Resldentla]- T\\ 0 to Planned CommerCIal Development and
for appro\al of an OutlIne Development Plan for property located at 7495 W 29th A venue, ordered
publIshed, publIc heanng set for
OR
"[ move to table mdefimtely Councll Blll1\o n6-2006, CJse No WZ-05..10, a request for approval
of a zone change from R-2, ReSIdentIal.. Two to Planned CommercIal Development and for
Jpproval of an OutlIne Development Plan for property located at 7495 W 29th Avenue."
Report Prepared by' Meredith Reckert (303-235-2848)
ReVIewed by' Alan WhIte
2
Attachments:
1 CouncIl Blll No 06-2006
ReQuest f('f Crt" Cmmcll ".erion-report form
3
I~TRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER
Council Bill No. 06-2006
Ordinance No.
Series of 2006
TITLE: AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZO:\E
CHANGE FROM R-2, RESIDEl\TIAL-TWO TO PLAl\]\'ED CO\IMERCIAL
DEVELOPEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLI~E
DEVELOPEMENT PLA..N FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7495 W. 29TH
AVENUE (CASE NO. WZ-05-10)
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE,
COLORADO niA.. T
Section 1. Upon applicatIOn by f\.1Jchael G Pharo ASSOCiates for M &: E F1113.11Cl:11.
LLC, approval of a zone change from R-2, ResIdentIal-Two to Planned CommerCIal
Development and for approval of an Outlme Dn elopment Plan for propeny loca1.:8 at -: 4L/~ \\
29th A venue and pursuant to the fmdmgs made based on testimony and eVIdence presented at a
public hearmg before the \Vheat Rtdge Cny CounClI, a zone change and Out\me Development
Plan are approved for the followmg described land
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE ONE..QUARTER OF SECTIOl\ 26.
TOW>iSHIP:; SOUTH, RA~GE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M, COl'NTY OF
JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORf....DO, BEING THE \VEST ONE-HALF OF LOT :;,
BLOCK 1, BARTH'S SCBDIVISION, BEI1\G MORE PARTICL'LARL Y DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS
BEGINNING AT THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION. THENCE
S02038'05"E. 66\ 2S FEET TO A Por:':T ON THE EAST RIGHT OF \VA Y U1\'E OF
WADSWORTH BOULEVARD, WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGIJ\TNING,
THENCE SOoo02'OYE AL01\'G SAID RIGHT-OF-WA Y LINE 635 80 FEET,
THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF- WA Y LINE S89052 \3"E, 315 06 FET,
THENCE 1\00000'3YE 63539 FEET THE:':CE ]\'89047 46"W, 31554 FEET TO THE
TRUE POL'iT OF BEGINNr\G THE ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS
200,40] SQL'ARE FEET OR 4 601 -\CRES !\fORE OR LESS
Section 2. \' ested Propenv RH?hts, Approval of thIS zone change and Outline
Development Plan does not create a \ested propen} nght. Vested propeny nghts may only
arIse and accrue pursuant to the proVISIOns of SectIon 26-12\ of the Code of Laws of the CIty of
'Wneat R1dge
Section 3. Safetv Clause, The CIty of \\ineat Rtdge hereby finds, determmes, and
declares that thIS ordll1ance IS promulgated under the general pollee power of the Clly elf 'W neat
R1dge, that It ]S promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the publIc and that thIS
ordmance IS necessary for the preservatIon of health and safety and for the protectIOn ofpubltc
A TT ACHlVIENT 1
con\'emence and welfare The City CounCIl further determmes that the ordmance bears a
rational relatIOn to the proper leglslatlve object sought to be attained,
Section 4. Se\'erablllt\ , If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of thiS Zomng Code
or the applicatIOn thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be aJJusted by a
court of competent JunsdictlOn mvalld, such Judgment shall not affect apphcatJon to other
persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any proVIsIOn, reqUIrements or standard
established by thiS Ordinance IS found to conflict With Similar proVISIOns, reqUIrements or
standards found elsewhere In the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat R.1dge, which are In
eXistence as of the date of adoptIOn of thIS Ordinance, the pro\'ISIOns, reqUIrements and standard,
here shall supersede and prevail.
Section 6 .
ThIS Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publlcallnn,
I:\TTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of to
on thiS day of . 2006, ordered published In full In a newspaper uf
general CIrculatIOn In the City of 'I.Jv neat R.1dge and Public Heanng and consideratIOn on final
passage set for .2006, at 700 o'clock p.m., In the Councll Chambers. 7500
West 29th Avenue, \Vheat R.1dge. Colorado
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a
\'ote of to . thiS day of . 2006
SIG]'\ED by the :..lay or on thiS
dav of
,2006
JERRY DITULLIO, MAYOR
ATTEST
Pamela Y Anderson, CllY Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY
GERAL DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY
2
~
!o~ ,I ~~
" I
\ )
"./:~/
ITEM NO
6,
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
. k..,. ,__ ~ ,~
~~
I i
COUNCIL MEETING DATE February 27, 2006
TITLE:
BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS
o PUBLIC HEARING
~ BlDSIMOTIONS
o RESOLUTIONS
o ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING (Date: _)
o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
QuasI-JudIcIal
o
Yes
~
No
I
, ~A" l,~ SCii<,,( '-. __
"-.Oity Clerk \.
~
' ~'c
CIty Man r 1
EXECl1T1VE Sl1MMARY:
The Board and CommIssIon vacancIes were advertIsed In the Wheat Ridge Transcript, Channel 8 and
the CIty's Website. Current members were contacted by mad and asked If they wanted to serve another
term ApphcatlOns were received and compiled the Clerk's Office and CIty Council held a reception
for the apphcants on F ebruaI) 21, 2006
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDA nON:
None
ST A TEMENT OF THE ISSUES:
If appoIntments are not made, the vacancies will remain. This could Impact the ability of a board or
commISSIOn to conduct bUSIness if a quorum IS unable to be held.
ALTERN A TlVES CONSIDERED:
None
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"} move to appoint. to the... .. .Board/Commlssion: tenn to expire March 2,...,., "(see attachment})
Report Prepared by' JanIce Smothers (303) 235-2815
Reviewed by' Pam Anderson. City Clerk (303) 235-2823
Attachments:
I DetaIled appomtments by position and dlstnct.
2. Applicant lIst
BOARD AND COMMISSION APPOINTMENT BY DISTRICT
DISTRICT I
I move to appoint:
~ Geis+ to the Animal Welfare and Control Commission, term
~i'ng rit2109.
..v1\lVl~ ~ltvULo the Board of Adjustment, term ending 3/2/09.
l~ ~to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending
3/2/09.
~e<A (3 ~ to the Parks & Recreation Commission, term ending
3/2/09. U
--/tvu;.. ~~ to the Planning Commission, term ending 3/2/09.
~ M~o the Liquor Authority, term ending 312109.
~~ de ~to the Cultural Arts Commission, term ending 3/2/09.
to the Cultural Arts Commission, term ending 3/2/08.
I~)
~-o.
DISTRICT II
~/"'rt move to appoint:
~i
~
~3
to the Animal Welfare and Control Commission, term
to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending
the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending
ATTACHMENT 1
DISTRICT II CON'T
~lM~
3/2/09.
3~~
~ ~-:>
to the Parks & Recreation Commission, term ending
to the Parks & Recreation Commission, term ending
to the Liquor Licensing Authority, term ending 3/2/09.
~JVUt1.l. VlWM(f'-- to the Cultural Commission, term ending 3/2/09.
~ ~lJ.
DISTRICT III
I move to appoint:
3/2/09.
3/2/09.
to the Board of Adjustment, term ending 3/2/09.
to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending
to the Parks & Recreation Commission, term ending
to the Planning Commission, term ending 3/2/09.
to the Liquor Authority, term ending 3/2/09.
to the Cultural Commission, term ending 3/2/09.
to the Cultural Commission, term ending 3/2/09.
9~-
@2/21/06
2006 DISTRICT I APPLICANTS
RECEPTION RSVP
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
Animal Welfare( 1)
Jean Schilling
eRoger Baker
eKathy Deitsch
BOA(1)
Betty Jo Page
Building Code( 1)
Kenneth Adams
Cultural(2)
Ronald Gehauf
Liquor Authority( 1)
DaVid Berry
eCarolyn Peterson
Parks & Rec( 1 )
eRyan Eggelton
eKaren Grupe
Plannlng( 1)
Anne Brinkman
eDavls Reinhart
enewapplicants
@2121106 2006 DISTRICT II APPLICANTS
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
Animal Welfare( 1)
Erna Mcintyre
Building Code(2)
Cultural( 1)
Liquor Authonty( 1 )
Kent DavIs
Parks & Rec(2)
Charles Spielman
eMlchael Snow
enew applicants
- ---- --
requested renewal YES
new applicant
new applicant YES
requested renewal YES
---
requested renewal YES
requested renewal
requested renewal
new applicant
YES
new applicant
new applicant
YES
can't attend but will send stateme
requested renewal
new applicant
YES
YES
requested renewal
requested renewal
YES
requested renewal
new applicant
YES
ATTACHMENT 2
DISTRICT IV
I move to appoint:
~~ tk.UcL
3/2/09.
to the Animal Welfare Control Commission, term ending
LaMrJ iA~
~ CCt l (CJ\A.) ?
3/2/09.
to the Board of Adjustment, term ending 3/2/09.
to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending
\~ s+~ to the Planning Commission, term ending 3/2/09.
~ P L C~ to the Liquor Licensing Authority, term ending 3/2/09.
to the Cultural Commission, term ending, 3/2109. (At
Large Position)
JfI7A~ (fllAAj Luvr~ the Cultural Commission, term ending, 3/21r1J.9
to the Cultural Commission, term ending, 3/2109.
p~ /)/lWYV1
WHEAT RIDGE FOUNDATION
I move to appoint:
Duy'l VIe.. ~ 11- to the Wheat Ridge Foundation, term ending 3/2/09.
u'-<..~ IH{.~
to the Wheat Ridge Foundation, term ending 3/2/09.
&(.iVIr--~~ U It (~ to the Wheat Ridge Foundation, term ending 3/2/09.
Srry f-o.
@2/21/06 2006 DISTRICT III APPLICANTS
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
BOA(1)
Building Coder 1)
Parks & Rec(2)
Planning(1 )
Liquor Authonty( 1 )
Cultural(2)
Janet Bell
Ronald Abo
Richard Matthews
Jerry Scezney
Virginia Johnson
-new applicants
requested renewal
requested renewal (verbal)
requested renewal
requested renewal
will send in renewal
@2/21/06 2006 DISTRICT IV APPliCANTS
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
Animal Welfare(1)
BOA(')
BUilding Coder 1)
Cultural(2)
Cultural
Plannlng( 1)
liquor Authonty( 1)
WR Foundalion
WR Foundalion
WR Foundation
Robert Hance
John Kellow
_Larry Linker
Geoffrey Wodell
Kim Stewart
_Tracy Langworthy
Judith DiCroce
_new applicants
Donna Downing
-Lesa Mullaney-Meeks
_Barbara Dellinger
-new applicants
requested renewal
requested renewal
new applicant
YES
YES
requested renewal AT LARGE POSITION
requested renewal
new applicant
requested renewal
requested renewal
new applicant
new applicant
YES
YES
YES
YES
\ i .~r \. l
\ -\;,,"
;\;,-," ",
'\ , ,
,~\\ Jvj (;-
/) .- "-
,'---, \J
INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER
Council Bill No. 06-2006
Ordinance No.
Series of 2006
\\ j\.0 l<,L/::
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE APPROVAL OF A ZONE
CHANGE FROM R-2, RESIDENTIAL- TWO TO PLANNED
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPEMENT AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN
OUTLINE DEVELOPEMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
7495 W. 29TH AVENUE (CASE NO. WZ-05-10)
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE. COLORADO THAT.
Section }, Upon applIcation by Michael G Pharo Associates for M & E Financial,
LLC, approval of a zone change from R-2, Residential-Two to Planned Commercial
Development and for approval of an OutlIne Development Plan for property located at 7495 W.
29th A venue and pursuant to the findings made based on testImony and eVIdence presented at a
public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City CouncIl, a zone change and Outline Development
Plan are approved for the following described land.
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SE ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION
26, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF
JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING THE WEST ONE-HALF OF
LOT 3, BLOCK L BARTH'S SUBDIVISION, BEING MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING AT THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION;
THENCE S02038'05"E. 661.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT OF
WAY LINE OF WADSWORTH BOULEVARD, WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOoo02'03"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE 63580 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE
S89052'13"E, 315 06 FET, THENCE NOooOO'33"E, 635.39 FEET; THENCE
N89047'46"W, 315.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING THE
ABOVE DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINS 200,401 SQUARE FEET OR 4 601
ACRES MORE OR LESS.
Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change and Outlme
Development Plan does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only
arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of
Wheat Ridge.
Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and
declares that this ordinance IS promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat
Ridge, that It is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the publIc and that thIS
ordinance IS necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public
convenience and welfare. The City Council further detenmnes that the ordmance bears a
rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attamed.
Section 4. Severability. If an) clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zomng Code
or the application thereof to any person or Clfcumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a
court of competent junsdlctlon mvahd, such Judgment shall not affect application to other
persons or circumstances.
Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision, requirements or standard
established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or
standards found elsewhere m the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in
eXistence as of the date of adoptIOn of this Ordinance, the provisions, reqUirements and standards
here shall supersede and prevail.
Section 6 .
This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication.
'(-0
"1~ c
\
. (
, {
""
b
INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first readmg by a vote of to
on this _ day of , 2006, ordered pubhshed in full in a newspaper of
general circulatIOn in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideratIOn on final
passage set for f\ \~,~ iL 2-Lf, 2006, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500
West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final readmg by a
vote of to , this day of ,2006.
SIGNED by the Mayor on this
day of
,2006
JERRY DITULLIO, MAYOR
ATTEST:
Pamela Y Anderson, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY
GERAL DAHL, CITY ATTORNEY
2
1 st publication:
2nd publicatIOn.
Wheat Ridge Transcript
Effective Date
3
~
~~~
~w,
~/
ITEM NO: ,.
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION
l~~.,~
~~
COUNCIL MEETING DATE February 27, 2006
TITLE:
HOUSING AUTHORITY APPOINTMENT
D PUBLIC HEARING
[8J BIDS/MOTIONS
D RESOLUTIONS
D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date _)
D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING
QuasI-JudIcIal
D
Yes
[8J
No
(,,'--~,~lL0l~
, Q1ty Clerk
~
' 0-> d
City M er '>S
EXECCTIVE SUMMARY:
An applicatIon for the City CouncIl position for the Housmg Authority has been received from Terry
Womble The Housmg Authont)'s members are appomted b) the Mayor and ratIfied by Clt) Council.
The term of thIs appomtment expIres m March of2009.
COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION:
None
ST A TEMEl"T OF THE ISSUES:
There WIll be a vacancy If the applicant IS not appomted,
AL TERNA TlVES CONSIDERED:
None
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
None
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
..\ move to ratIfY the mayoral appointment of Terry Womble to the Housing Authority. term to expire
March. 2009 .,
or:
Report Prepared by Janice Smothers (303) 235-2815
Reviewed by' Pam Anderson, CIty Clerk (303) 235-2823
Attachments:
ApplIcatIOn - TeIT) Womble
fOlstribU1ed to:
Jats, '1/11 !()t,
City Clerk: ...........
City Treas:
Council: %
Mailof' \.-
Ci"" ,]r' I-
Ci., v
Dep~ ;'; Jads:
r
t-'-------~PPL Y ONLY FOR ONE BOARD OR
COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO THE:
/ '~<,<>---I- rQ,) e (Jou~;~.(c;' AI.i,~Lo/{ y
(BO D/COMMISS N/COMMITTEE)
DATE. ,2 /i//o~ DISTRICT I
! I
HOW LONG HAVE YOU BEEN A RESIDENT OF WHEAT RIDGE.
'/
ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER? ~~ C,
WHY ARE YOU SEEKING THIS A;POINTMENT? i: cC'-< 1, k '" '" + ~"
'\-L-.cc- /""'5 t)~", (.{CO..aPI,S~-(' /'Jv 't~" (.ii.o"'1V
I f
IJ ~
--- '~I ~
,
l-vcr-' Ie
/'
DO YOU HAVE EXPERIENCE IN THIS AREA? V.,. <.,
HAVE YOU EVER SERVED. OR ARE YOU CURRENTLY ON A
BOA~~(~~~rl~I~~~M~lc;;~~.~~~t)S~~,~~~,~ ~NE? HOW LONG? ,L( <;,
ARE THERE ANY CONFLICTS WHICH WOULD INTERFERE WITH REGULAR
ATTENDANCE OR DUTIES? /)0
~ J I it
SIGNATURE I /~ I, [J~l. "
PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME. ~ ,^ ;;~ w/ a ({i
'-- / / ,(\ J
ADDRESS' J r; ({! ! -€ I {" f :;/ LJ(\~"f I'r J~ ;' c 0 &Cio:S?
HOME PHONE. 303- 4-;),,0 - .~ S 3 s-
BUSINESS PHONE. ?,a J - r; 0(- 301/
E-MAIL ADDRESS' 1-- (..'J "--,,,,~/-e. @ C c!--ro<sf fl'/t-
City of Wheat Ridge
In this space there is a large scale map that could not be scanned at
the this time. Please see the Wheat ridge Clerks office if you would
like to see the map.
'Ii
(I:
{.
"-
~
"
'\
~
.
AA
~
11I""
rij!>t"'""'"
'-"~.','" t., ~ ~., .~.
_.. rt, .
LIII>..,. ...." '"
1,.- ~~ -..~ .~
.. ~ it
~ ....."
Page 1 of 1
Janice Smothers
From:
Janice Smothers
Sent: Tuesday, January 0069'51 AM .-----......
To: BFTireCo@aol.co ;-COunciiiOf8ct:1',1:z@~()mcas~okey@comcast.net; Karen Berry
khberry26@hotmail. ; -*lpa@comcast.net; sangjw@netzero.net; Womble, Terry
Cc: Pam Anderson
Subject: 2006 Board and Commission Renewals
Attachments: 2006 and commission renewals.xls
-
--
--...- .~
----- ....-.--
-
---
January 24, 2006
TO: Council Members
SUBJECT:
2006 Board and Commission Application Process
Please refer to the attached listing, by District, for the 2006 Board and Commission renewal
applicants as of 1/24/06.
We asked the existing members to respond by February 6, 2006, if they wanted to serve another
term. As you can see, the majority of responses have been received, but we are waiting on a few
In addition, the new applicant applications have been distributed in your mail boxes.
If you have any questions, please give me a call
I will keep you posted on updates.
janice
1/24/2006
@1/24/06
BOARD NAME
Cultural
Geoffrey Wodell
Animal Welfare
Jean Schilling
eRoger Baker
BOA
Betty Jo Page
Building Code
Kenneth Adams
Cultural(2)
Ronald Gehauf
Liquor Authority
David Berry
_Carolyn Peterson
Parks & Rec
Johnathan Puckett
_Ryan Eggelton
Planning
Anne Brinkman
-David Reinhart
-new applicants
BOARD NAME
Building Code(2)
Cultural
Liquor Authority
Kent Davis
Animal Welfare
Erna Mcintyre
Parks & Rec(2)
Charles Spielman
-Michael Snow
-new applicants
BOARD NAME
BOA
Janet Bell
Building Code
Ronald Aba
Parks & Rec(Z)
Richard Matthews
PlanninQ
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
AL
x
x
new applicant
x
x
Itr not returned yet
x
new applicant
x
new applicant
x
new applicant
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
II
x
II
x
II
II
Itr not retIJ rnEld yet
new applicant
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
III
x
III
Itr not returned yet
III
Itr not returned yet
;:-<..({ (/
, ' .
_L ,..
Jerry Scezney
Liquor Authority
Brenda Locricchio
Cultural(2)
Virginia Johnson
Sharon Couturier
_new applicants
BOARD NAME
Cultural(2)
Building Code
John Kellow
-Larry Linker
Planning
Kim Stewart
-Tracy Langworthy
Liquor Authority
Judith DiCroce
Animal Welfare
Robert Hance
lJ;r1
BOA
Q",; nc f
W(\"t
Daniel Bybee
-new applicants
BOARD NAME
WHEAT RIDGE FOUNDATION
WR Found Donna Downing
WR Found Johnathan Puckett
WR Found John Miks
WR Found _Lesa Mullaney-Meeks
-new a licants
III
Itr not returned yet
III
x
III
III
Itr not returned yet
x
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
IV
x
new applicant
IV
x
new applicant
IV
x
IV
~
4tr l'Iet r1iltlolrRS8 Jet'"
IV
U~t/
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
x
(District II)
(District II)
(District II)
(O,stTict 1\)
new applicant
x
X
wtFOLud o&tJ)(t~~ ~i1lVl~1Z
UT, [IF IJJHEHT F'1I1I3E
Fax: 3CL3~'3459;:'4
** Tra.nsmiT
Conf' _ F'epot i:
t..+.
F',l
Line t'~umbp_.r.1 (ITI IJF J"HEHT FID
" ~J - .' GE
Fa 7('(7--~45SC4
Jan ~'4 ~f":II:,
w.v
;: . .J _ ._'..:...' ~
Fd Fhone Number Mode
~tart
[~"jJ LENH ..
NORMRL ,:'4,W:1::,
~1- ..
Time
CI~'3:,1I
F '.3'~jPl F i:>: u.1t I
3 j:j Ci f
ttete j
Janice Smothers
From:
Janice Smothers
Tuesday, January 24. 2008 9:51 AM
BFTireCo@aol com; CounciilorSchulz@comcast.net; egokey@comcast.nat: Karen Berry
khberry26@hotmail.com; klpa@comcast.net; sangjw@netzero net: Womble, Terry
Cc; Pam Anderson
Subject: 2006 Board and Commission Renewals
Attachments: 2006 and commission renewals.xls
Sent:
To:
-'...............---
-
_.----......----.~--" ~
_..~._-"-
January 24, 2006
TO: Council Members
SUBJECT:
2006 Board and Commission Application Process
Please refer to the attached listing, by District, for the 2006 Board and Commi'ssion renewal
applicants as of 1/24/06
We asked the existing members to respond by February 6, 2006, if they wanted to serve another
term. As you can see, the majority of responses have been received, but we .:lre waiting on a few.
In addition, the new applicant applications have been distributed in your mail boxes.
If you have any questions, please give me a call
I will keep you posted on updates.
janlce
@2/21/06
RECEPTION RSVP
2006 DISTRICT I APPLICANTS
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
Animal Welfare(1)
BOA(1)
Building Code(1)
Cultural(2)
Liquor Authority(1)
Parks & Rec( 1 )
Planning( 1)
Jean Schilling
_Roger Saker
.Kathy Deitsch
Betty Jo Page
Kenneth Adams
Ronald Gehauf
David Berry
-Carolyn Peterson
_Ryan Eggelton
_Karen Grupe
Anne Brinkman
_Davis Reinhart
-new applicants
@2/21/06 2006 DISTRICT II APPLICANTS
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
Animal Welfare( 1)
Building Code(2)
Cultural(1 )
Liquor Authority( 1)
Parks & Rec(2)
Erna Mcintyre
Kent Davis
Charles Spielman
-Michael Snow
-new applicants
requested renewal
new applicant
new applicant
requested renewal
requested renewal
requested renewal
requested renewal
new applicant
new applicant
new applicant
requested renewal
new applicant
requested renewal
requested renewal
requested renewal
new applicant
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
can't attend but will send stateme
YES
YES
YES
YES
@2/21/06 2006 DISTRICT III APPLICANTS
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
BOA(1)
Building Code( 1)
Parks & Rec(2)
Planning(1 )
Liquor Authority( 1 )
Cultural(2)
Janet Bell
Ronald Abo
Richard Matthews
Jerry Scezney
Virginia Johnson
_new applicants
requested renewal
requested renewal (verbal)
requested renewal
requested renewal
will send in renewal
@2/21/06 2006 DISTRICT IV APPLICANTS
BOARD/POSITIONS NAME
Animal Welfare( 1)
BOA(1)
Building Code(1)
Cultural(2)
Cultural
Planning(1 )
Liquor Authority(1)
WR Foundation
WR Foundation
WR Foundation
Robert Hance
John Kellow
-Larry Linker
Geoffrey Wodell
Kim Stewart
- Tracy Langworthy
Judith DiCroce
_new applicants
Donna Downing
-Lesa Mullaney-Meeks
-Barbara Dellinger
_new applicants
requested renewal
requested renewal
new applicant
YES
will not make it: ill
YES
requested renewal AT LARGE POSITION
requested renewal
new applicant
requested renewal
requested renewal
new applicant
new applicant
YES
YES
YES
YES
@2/06/06
BOARD NAME
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
Animal Welfare
Jean Schilling
_Roger Baker
_Kathy Deitsch
BOA
'ltJ
Betty Jo Page
Building Code
Kenneth Adams
Cultural(2)
Ronald Gehauf
Liquor Authority
David Berry
-Carolyn Peterson
Parks & Rec
Johnathan Puckett
-Ryan Eggelton
_Karen Grupe
Planning
Anne Brinkman
-Davis Reinhart
_new applicants
BOARD NAME
Building Code(2)
Cultural
Liquor Authority
Kent Davis
Animal Welfare
Erna Mcintyre
Parks & Rec(2)
Charles Spielman
_Michael Snow
-new applicants
X
new applicant
new applicant
X
X
X
X
new applicant
X
new applicant
new applicant
X
new applicant
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
II
X
II
X
II
II
x
new applicant
Building Code
John Kellow IV X
-Larry Linker
Planning
Kim Stewart IV X
_ Tracy Langworthy
Liquor Authority
Judith DiCroce IV X
Animal Welfare
Robert Hance IV X
BOA
[)~___.------w-
_new applicants
BOARD NAME
BOA
Janet Bell
Building Code
Ronald Aba
Parks & Rec(2)
Richard Matthews
Planning
Jerry Scezney
Liquor Authority
Brenda Locricchio
Cultural(2)
Virginia Johnson
Sharon Couturier
_new applicants
BOARD NAME
Cultural(2)
Cultural
Geoffrey Wodell
BOARD NAME
WHEAT RIDGE FOUNDATION
WR Found Donna Downing
WR Found Johnathan Puckett
WR Found John Miks
WR Found _Lesa Mullaney-Meeks
WR Found _Barbara Dellinger
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
III X
III Itr not returned yet
III >< Itr AS! mlblrRea 'j'et
III X
III X
III Itr not returned yet
III X
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
AL
X
new applicant
new applicant
--.....x__ ._______.ffsigned
2006 WANTS TO SERVE ANOTHER TERM
DISTRICT YES NO
X
(District II) \ 10( S
(District II)
(District lit)
X
X
'-1 f'-,
J' "r
t';;7
new aoolicant I
(/)
UJ
';t, . "-
Z JI--0\1\ ,..'"
0:: '\.l""''\.>
:::> ~ ~.:::;:'...'.'::..>.
I--r-F"V-
UJ
0::
~+ ,~,Sl, ;;.') ::t "-
,~ .:::'. 2..~~ :2.~ ~::.. -~ (' ~ <S
_ .J S.-"'~- ~ ,,-:'~~----
",2:'_ -' ~~~~ ~'''~4~.
~ r.) \ (.:J a \J
"- .? < <. ~
\
,tt ~ ;
1
,
~ II!
4:: ,I
'2 II"
t'>) \ '> '> '>'> '> '\ ',. '> ')\~ ')\ '))\'> '> ') \+ ')
.~'" ."J ,I
=' '-"'J...,
_c_:~
--. -- \
::,-,t;~
.~> ,>----~
o :"
z ",-8(:;\ -.:;,
___;:,),-\:)0
z 0 ~(, (j'-
0:: 0' r- \-(.i -~ -
:::> ..~ -_. ., -
\-~::~-"! ~":",~~
UJ- ..
0::
\\J'"
~j
.J\. ..[\'
,,'\., 'J'\~'U' ,~'\ '. f
').J'" '\.) \,," I lJ
'V" ,;-/" ~~
I
<'
"J
'v
7"
l-
t)
ii
t)
is - = '" "", "", - - - - "',,, - - " "'\- -" ;;!
~~~ ... H€J '~\\'~'~
__- -0-0-0000 0000' rororo
QiQiQi oooQ)Q)Q) ,s,s,s,s -0-0'0
:? :? :? t) t) t) 0:: 0:: 0:: :J :J :J :J e \ e C
o~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~__-_ooo
K. . . c c c _ _ _ . . . . · · · · 0,0 ·
~ E E E ~ ~ ~,g g g ~ ~ ~ 2 2 2 g g g g 3 Z Z Z :o!:o:o
o '2 '2 '2 0 0 0 '33 '3 ro ro ro .!!l .!!l .!ll 0- 0- 0- 0- S S S S u- \U- u-
m~~~mmmmmm~~~~~~~~~~oo00333
, ,- \ :::;
, 10) e <I> .Q ~ Q)
, \<1> \".:ro3 .c cQ)="':O>
C 0 to Q) e 0 Q)- o'c Q) ole
0> Q) Q) OJ Q) co :J - .c ro ill' 0 0 \ ~ <I> ::> '0 ::> ,-
< ", g ~ . \1 0 . ~. " E c toE 0' = E " 0 ~ ~
~ el ro g, =',.g. 4:: .0"..9 e ~'2 ~ ~ !2 f'\,,!! 00 ,'R o\.':?' 3: C 0 <I>
~~% .m=~.. ~...'J6_~_M.O.
UJ (/) '2,.t.g ~,Qi Q) :g,~ ~ ~ ~ CO (/) * ~,8 ~.c :g~15,g; ~ ro:Z
< e _ OJ ~_ _ e ro e e ~'.c OJ ~ - - e - ro ,- ~ - e e e
.::. w'.o.,,~eec rol e'-C;>C ._eo>'roO e
~ m E'o ... . o~ ~ = g c .S · · .~ 0,0 =. ~ 0 ~
Z~UJo::co~o~o::~~t)O::4::~~O~CO~O::>(/)C)~O~
'v
,.
-----------
o
z
Z
a::
:;)
tu
a::
(j)
u.J
~.
z'
a::
:;)
tu
a::
o
u.J
--'
4:
~
a::
u.J
r-
tu
--'
'0
a:
'(j)
0-
;t
== == \== _ _ _ _ _ _ ::: \'2. '2. '2. '2. '2.,
\
I
.. .' I. I . · miii
" ~OO "00 ~o 0 ,,~O;;..~
,$ 00 a::Q) ,s $ a::Q) ,s 0 Q),s $ 00 ,s -0 -0 -0
\~ ' ~ ,0"" ~ "ee.
O~ m",m<-~"'< m"'~<'--~ mm<"'-
",. e & _.. . ~ -'... e\& - 000 ·
< E < " ~ [' 0 2 E ~ g < " ~ eO' , E < '6 e 0 ~ ~ ~'\"
o '2 0 3 '" 5- 3'2 , ,2" 03 , · 5-"3 "32 0 'S j; 5- '" '" '" ,"3
~ <,~ ~ ~ ~ 5 0'< ~ j~ ~ ~ 0: 5 0 0 <,~ ~ ~ 5" " "0
~ e . 0 ~'
Cf)~C _ ro ~E'6'~ Q)~O)c $
rn . E ,. '. g c ~ g ~ ~ · · 0 ' \- ~
~~~c...E:c:-2$%.(/) 0~~N'B~",g\Q)3-t::ec...~ .g
"',~ < S 'l' _ . e '" _ _ D ,. 0 0 0 · DO. 0 co. ~
u 0 ,s 1::.- Q) G u (/) 10 \$ <( -0 8 --' .., 0 :r:: ciS' 'lfi ~ '6 2 0 ~ ?
"' "',1 .1;; Ifi ~ ~,. .0 <e" ,'" 1\'~ i ~'. "';;; c 1;;,." ~
,.e.['e."..~E.lc~e--._e Mee.
"\ 1\ ~ ,. ~ [', ~ i Ec . e 0 Q >; .g',2 .g g -'6s\"3 -'6 '6 -'6 g
_ ,_~ ,<0"'",\0~~"''''1~>''''''01~1101~
-,-
c ' ~ , -'i\ c./\ "ceCa
\'L-l> ' -\\ G (, - 0 rJ, <0
"r- \y I '?-' ~ ~
C \\...\) , -1(f '\ -) -" ,.:>
~ wc1,u. ( (pyVVv'tw.e- ~~
J~ ~c,
~
'VJwk o~\\ p~~
'2,~<''i>\<Y \~ \
~ r~~
1ft,( ~. C~ ~ IV- "J..-(, .
,,^ <Y' ; j.,-i ~
\~~'I' #'
~~~I
is Zf)y; ~\j
~ 'f:L\~J ~7.)
~~~J'
CJ0q ~~~
(,--z
/ (!to
~.
~
Mch~ -t>~
L~ hu--" -!cJ.
~ hQ sj-vL~
lUJcJ;fh~
~~f]
Hdil~
~(~
7/0.
~-L( .
./0.
(f tAih !),
LUU~.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PUBLIC BEARING ROSTER
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
PUBLIC BEARING BEFORE THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COURCIL
CASE NO.
COURCIL BILL NO.
TITLE:
A REQUEST FOR THE APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PLAT
FOR PROPERTY ZONED PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED AT
4900 AND 4990 PARFET STREET
(CASE NOS. WZ-05-11 AND MS-05-04) (PHARO FOR BEAR LAND HOLDINGS
YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS CHECK
IN FAVOR OPPOSED
, ,
, ,
- .J
) C . J \
'" C.~.
"
------
IF YOU HEED MORE ROOM PLEASE SIGN ON BACK OF PAGEl
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK
DATE: February 27, 2006
ANY PERSON MAY SPEAK ON MATTERS OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS FOR A MAXIMUM OF
THREE MINUTES, UNLESS ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY AGREEMENT OF
COUNCIL.
EACH SUCH PERSON MUST SIGN THE PUBLIC COMMENT ROSTER, STATING NAME,
ADDRESS, AND TOPIC OF COMMENT. PLEASE PRINT!!!!!!!!
NAME
ADDRESS
TOPIC
~ T, M ,vA\.i \-\P 3::l..~o (,v~y C.}.
""" J-..:'':,;('f.Jo... Np/5t>i1 Qis7) w~l-..;dl Iftr. .L1Y7./,,/
-r II . '), {) I r ~
'-i /'t ( r.- '-'.,c ::'0<0/'_ .~ I r u /tV.e bC;7~R
WI\<At 1c;J<le P~rR.-
!PL.... ~uJ. 1=\,) ~""J... t
wiAr''\ -J ('\: c.f;y: I -!-b-v7o>- "1
A,/1t" '.... f.-.. _ 1/"V 0rl/, . If"
n U ~ v
'DI <; 1v I?,(: f?H..f., ~ v '" 7i 0"'"