Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/07/19I City of WheatP,idge PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA February 7, 2019 Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on February 7, 2019 at 7:00 p.m, in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. *Agendapackets and minutes are available online athttp://www.ci.wheatridge.co.usl95/Plarming- Commission 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be recommended for placement on the agenda.) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—January 17, 2019 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case Nos. WZ-18-017. WZ18-18 & WS -18-02: An application filed by Upham Partners, LLC for approval of a zone change from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP); approval of a Specific Development Plan; and approval of a major subdivision for 38 townhomes located at 4000, 4042, 4062 and 4066 Upham Street. S. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Resolution 01-2019 10. ADJOURNMENT Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Sara Spaulding Public Information Officer at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of a meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. City of i�9r WheatMidge PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting January 17, 2019 CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair BUCKNAM at 6:59 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29a' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Commission Members Absent: Alan Bucknam Emery Dorsey Janet Leo Scott Ohm Richard Peterson Amanda Weaver Vivian Vos Daniel Larson 06 Staff Members Present: Ken Johntstone, Community Development Director Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager Jordan Jefferies, Civil Engineer II Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner LEO to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried 7-0. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — November 15, 2018 It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner PETERSON to approve the minutes of November 15, 2018, as written. Motion carried 7-0. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2019 -I— No one wished to speak at this time. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. WS -18-01 & WZ-18-13: An application filed by Wonderland Homes for approval of a 56 -lot subdivision and for approval of a Specific Development Plan for property zoned Planned Residential Development (PRD) and located at 5372-5392 Quail Street. Mr. Johnstone explained that for The City of Wheat Ridge to move forward with public hearings on these two cases a portion of Quail Street's right of way (ROW) on the City of Arvada's side will need to be in place. The ROW acceptance was scheduled for a City Council meeting on January 7, however it did not occur. Mr. Johnstone explained there are some title issues which need to be resolved so staff recommends postponing the public hearing indefinitely. It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to indefinitely postpone the public hearings for Case NO's. WS -18- 01 and WZ-18-03, Quail Run Subdivision Plat and Specific Development Plan, with full new public notice being provided for future Planning Commission public hearing. Motion approved 7-0. B. Case No. WS -18-07: An application filed by TH Yarrow Gardens, LLC for approval of a 89 -lot subdivision for property zoned Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) and Planned Residential Development (PRD) located at 4255 Yarrow Street and 7955 West 42" Avenue. Ms. Mikulak gave a short presentation regarding the subdivision and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Commissioner OHM mentioned he still has concerns regarding the traffic in the area on Yarrow Street which is one lane and if one car wants to turn left on 44"' Avenue all traffic backs up. He asked if there could be a designated right turn lane only and no straight or left turn option. Mr. Jefferies said there has been a traffic study and there is a plan to add a signal light at 41" and Wadsworth Blvd. when the Wadsworth project is finished. This will be another way to exit the neighborhood, not just Yarrow Street. He also mentioned there is a potential for adding a light at 44ffi Avenue and Yarrow, but at this time it is not being looked at due to the widening of Wadsworth. Planning Commission Minutes -2— January 2— January 17, 2019 Roger Loecher Wheat Ridge Resident Mr. Loecher noted he does not have a problem with the townhomes going in at Yarrow Gardens, just the traffic it is going to create. He noted that the property owners (he being one of them) will not allow 41" to be extended out to Wadsworth and if there is a light put at 44"' and Yarrow, he feels it will take away from the business parking lot. He feels putting a light at Ammons is a much better idea. Authur Brenner 7A Evergreen Resident, Wheat Ridge Property Owner He asked if the townhomes will be for rent or sale. Commissioner BUCKNAM said it is not pertinent to this case. Commissioner VOS asked if the subdivision development can be reversed until the roads and the flow of traffic get figured out. Ms. Mikulak explained that this case is regarding the lot line adjustment and the traffic study was not re opened and there is no way to unwind the zoning or the plat that is in place. She said that staff shares the concern for traffic but the street is not going to be expanded before the development. It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WS -18-07, a request for approval of an 89 -lot subdivision on property zoned Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) and Planned Residential Development (PRD) and located at the northwest corner of Yarrow Street and W. 42" Avenue (approximately 4255 Yarrow), for the following reasons. 1. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. 2. The requirements of Article IV of the zoning and development code have been met. With the following condition: 1. The revisions requested by the Public Works Department related to labels, notes, and typos shall be addressed prior to the City Council public hearing. Motion carried 7-0. Planning Commission Minutes -3— January 3— January 17, 2019 C. Case No. WZ-18-28: An application filed by GoFarm for approval of a Specific Development Plan Amendment for property zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to allow an accessory structure for local food share distribution located at 7495 West 29"' Avenue. Ms. Mikulak gave a short presentation regarding the Specific Development Plan Amendment and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Ms. Mikulak mentioned two other potential locations for the container were added that are not listed in the agenda packet. Commissioner PETERSON asked if the development standards for this shipping container apply to other properties in Wheat Ridge as Well. Ms. Mikulak explained that the development standards are specific for this sight only and it is a custom document for this Planned Development. Commissioner PETERSON asked if there is traffic flow preferences for the three locations and said he prefers the northern location because it seems the easiest to get to without blocking any traffic. 1 Commissioner OHM thanked staff for the additional locations because he did not think the original site was good for the code because he felt it could be a front yard accessory building which is not allowed in the code. He also liked the northern- most sight because there are pine trees to help buffer the east side properties and it does not hinder the flow of traffic in the parking lot. He also asked about the Building Department's comment about the structure being attached to the ground. Ms. Mikulak explained the1choring system is so the structure cannot be moved. Commissioner DORSEY also said he likes the northern site preferably, especially when food deliveries are made and he wondered how the food deliveries are made. Ms. Mikulak reserved that question for the applicant. Commissioner VOS wanted the artwork explained and setbacks. Ms. Mikulak explained the difference between art and signage. She said that any graphic that promotes commercial activity is considered signage. In this instance, the murals will not detract from the sign allowance. Ms. Mikulak added that the minimum setbacks are 30 feet from Wadsworth and 291h Avenue, 25 feet from the 30u' Avenue right-of-way and 20 feet from the eastern property line. Planning Commission Minutes -4— January 4— January 17, 2019 Commissioner LEO asked how this is an associated use to the planned development. Ms. Mikulak said it promotes health and is not limited to the cliental at MCPN, but people buy shares and then come pick up their produce and take it home. She explained it is a complimentary use in providing a public health focus. Commissioner WEAVER asked if GoFarm will be written in to the planning document. Ms. Mikulak said it will be written in as a local food share program. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked if there needs to be a certain amount of transparency and could it be artwork similar to what was done at Sprouts and Lucky's. Ms. Mikulak mentioned that both those sites have master sign plans so artwork and transparencies were a part of the plans. Commissioner PETERSON asked if the advertising on the container will be charged against the signage for the clinic. Ms. Mikulak said no, it is by structure. Lindsey Hoffman GoFarm Employee Ms. Hoffman explained that not every shareholder picks up food every week so traffic can be very light. She explained that two of the other locations in Golden will receive the food and then a small van will deliver the food to the Wheat Ridge location on Wednesday afternoons and then the van return to Golden. She also said the food will only be located in the container. Ms. Hoffman also mentioned GoFarm also prefers the northern site as well. Commissioner WEAVER asked about the fee structure. Ms. Hoffman said their mission is to make local healthy food more accessible and affordable. She mentioned they do accept Snap which are food stamps and double up food bucks for the people who are on low-income food programs. Commissioner LEO asked if the container is refrigerated and if so, is there any noise associated with the refrigeration. Ms. Hoffman said yes the container will be refrigerated, this is how the food remains fresh and there is no noise heard outside the container. She also explained Planning Commission Minutes - 5— January 17, 2019 that if a share is not picked up by Friday or there is extra food left over it is then donated to other GoFarm programs or food banks. Commissioner LEO also wanted to know if a shareholder pays to become a shareholder. Ms. Hoffman said a shareholder is synonymous with customer, so a person is paying for food. Commissioner VOS asked if the container is 8 x 20 -feet and wondered where the door is located for shareholders to access. She also asked if at a later time tents will be set up outside where those would be located. Ms. Hoffman answered yes to the size of the container and said the doors are the typical doors at the end of the container. She added there might be a small welcome table outside, then the shareholders will enter the container to collect their food. She added there will always be one employee there to welcome people during the hours of food collection. She mentioned that the tents will be setup next to the container and would fill the rest of the parking space and would not take up any more spaces. Commissioner VOS asked where the container will hook up to electricity. She added she prefers the northern location as well. Ms. Hoffman said the power is existing such as a light pole and the power cables will be buried. Ms. Mikulak added that the tents would have to be approved by MCPN, and they are allowed by the City as a produce stand which is part of an urban agricultural initiative and all produce stands are allowed in all zone districts in the City. Commissioner DORSEY asked how waste will be hauled away. Ms. Hoffman said the waste, which is minimal, will go to another of their sites and will be composted. We ask shareholders to bring their own bags to take their food home in. if Commissioner BUCKNAM asked how long the season for food collection. Ms. Hoffman said the season is 20 weeks long; it starts the 2°d week in June and goes until the last week in October. She added that GoFarm started a winter share this year which goes from January to April although there is no set plans for a winter share at this site yet. The container will be there year round no matter what. Louise Canjar 3055 Webster Street Planning Commission Minutes -6— January 6— January 17, 2019 Ms. Canjar thinks the GoFarm model is a wonderful, but she does not want to look at a shipping container every day and would prefer to see it located on the 29"' Avenue or Wadsworth Blvd. locations not the northern location. Donald Edelen 2935 Webster Street Mr. Edelen also thinks the GoFarm idea is good, but does not want to see the container from his back yard. He has two major concerns: 1) he feels the northern location is not a large enough area for the container. 2) He thinks the container would be encroaching on the setback on the northern location and he also thinks there is an easement on the northern side of the property that he is worried about. Mr. Edelen mentioned he does not want to see outside stands like a farmers market. He would also like to know the hours of operation. He also mentioned concerns about 30"' Avenue being connected to Wadsworth Blvd. Lauren Neighbor from Webster Street Ms. Lauren mentioned she does not like the idea of GoFarm and feels the MCPN parking lot should be left alone. Commissioner OHM added some information about the distance from the curb of the northern location to the homes on the north side of the MCPN property. He calculated the distance from the scale on the PCD that is located in the agenda packet and he believes there to be about 130 feet in between the two. He suggested tC ome evergreen trees could be planted as a buffer. ommissioner BUCKNAM asked if there is an answer to the possibility of 301i Avenue connecting to Wadsworth and if there is a grade change from the surrounding properties to the northern location site. Ms. Mikulak responded that the house north of MCPN property is 2 to 3 feet lower than the northern most proposed GoFarm site and Wadsworth sits about 10 feet higher than the eastern side of the MCPN property. She also mentioned there is no plan to connect 30"' Avenue to Wadsworth. Commissioner BUCKNAM also asked if the public noticing could be addressed. Ms. Mikulak said there is no neighborhood meeting requirement for an SDP amendment and there is a 300 -foot radius for noticing a public hearing, in addition to two yellow signs, one on 291i Avenue and one on Wadsworth Blvd. She also mentioned that no letters were received and she only received 2 phone calls inquiring about details, but nothing for or against. Planning Commission Minutes -7— January 7— January 17, 2019 Commissioner WEAVER asked if a condition of container placement should be in the motion. Ms. Mikulak responded that currently there is no condition related to placement, only that it be consistent with the SDP. She explained that if there is any contemplation of another location or multiple locations other than the location adjacent to Wadsworth then that needs to be specified in a condition of approval. Commissioner VOS asked if the case could be postponed so the residents could have a discussion with GoFarm. Ms. Mikulak said the City does not get involved with communication between the applicant and the residents, but if they want to have a discussion later, they can, but there will not be a postponement. Commissioner PETERSON asked what the side yard distance is between houses is in this neighborhood and the distance from the front of one house to the front of another house across the street. Ms. Mikulak explained the side setbacks are 5 to 15 feet on an individual lot so the homes can be 10 to 20 feet apart. The front yard setbacks are a minimum of 25 feet so including right-of-way there can be about 90 feet in-between the front of the homes. Commissioner PETERSON wanted confirmation that the distance between the nearest house and the container, in the northern location is greater that the distance between homes in this neighborhood. Ms. Mikulak confirmed this to be true. Commissioner OHM asked if the initial location on the western site is considered to be in the front yard setback which is not allowed in the City's code. Ms. Mikulak explained that the container, doesn't sit in any yard because it is outside the 50 -foot setback to Wadsworth. Also, the standards are dictated by the requirements for this property in the Planned Development; so the other standards, in other zone districts, do not apply. Commissioner LEO asked what type of fence is on the eastern side of the MCPN property. Ms. Mikulak said it is a solid fence and is 6 feet in height and runs the length of the property. Planning Commission Minutes -8— January 8— January 17, 2019 Commissioner DORSEY asked if the container could be put on the pad on the bump out close to the northern site which would place it further away from the homes and not take from parking spaces. Eileen O'Rourke Founder & CEO of GoFarm Ms. O'Rourke said the MCPN manager does not want to disrupt the landscaping and preferred the parking spaces. Commissioner Peterson asked if the container could be placed on the east side of the 12 parking places instead of the west side of the northern site. Ms. O'Rourke explained there is a light pole on the west side of the 12 parking spaces and the power runs from the MCPN building to the light pole and that is where they will tap into the power. Ms. Hoffman added that the GoFarm mission is to increase access to local healthy food and to be an asset in the community, not a hindrance. There is not a lot of activity around the GoFarm container. She mentioned that some of their locations have winter shares and she would love for anyone to visit and check them out. It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner OHM to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-18-28, a request for approval of an amended Specific Development Plan providing for accessory use and structure related to local food distribution on property zoned Planned Commercial Development and located at 7495 W. 29' Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development, as stated in Section 26-301 of the Code of Laws. 2. The specific development plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the outline development plan. 3. The proposed uses are consistent with those approved by the outline development plan. 4. The proposed use and structure does not diminish the quality of the project and is not detrimental to the site or vicinity. 5. All responding agencies have indicated they have no concerns with the proposal. 6. The specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the criteria for review. With the following conditions: 1. The new structure shall be consistent with the ODP and SDP subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. Planning Commission Minutes -9— January 9— January 17, 2019 2. Electrical service shall be provided underground and not overhead. 3. There are three proposed, sites if the north site is selected, landscaping needs to be addressed for buffering issues. Commissioner PETERSON is hesitant to force GoFarm into planting expensive trees on the northern site because he is afraid GoFarm will go away and he doesn't want that to happen. He reiterated the space from container to nearby houses is greater than distance from house to house. Commissioner OHM confirmed the cost of the trees will be inexpensive and the underground electricity will cost more. He would rather see the container on the north site because he does not want other commercial properties to think they have a right to put a containers along Wadsworth, if placed on the western site. He also likes the traffic circulation on the north site on this property. Commissioner LEO thinks the fence on the back of the neighborhood properties should be enough screening. Commissioner WEAVER said she is in support of GoFarm; it will be an asset and not a detriment to the community. She explained it is a great way for the community to access healthy food and it is not a farmers market Commissioner BUCKNAM added he thinks the name of GoFarm is ideal for Wheat Ridge since it is the home of the Wheat Ridge Farmers, the local high school. He has seen the containers in Golden and thinks it is a great model and idea and he likes the relationship with MCPN. He also likes the flexibility of the three different sites on the property. Motion approved 7-0. D. Case No. ZOA-18-05: An ordinance amending Article IV of Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws to regulate the creation of flag lots. Mr. Johnstone gave a brief explanation of flag lots, access to a street and a history of previously approved subdivisions with flag lots. Commissioner PETERSON asked if there can be more than one flag made in a subdivision. Mr. Johnstone and Ms. Mikulak said yes, but the access point would usually have to be wider, and it would depend on utility districts requirements. Commissioner OHM said he is glad to see there will be a hearing process for flag lots although he wondered how often this is going to happen. Planning Commission Minutes - 10— January 17, 2019 Commissioner VOS asked why there is any subdivision under administrative review and not public hearing. Mr. Johnstone explained that usually a lot is oversized and follows all the development standards after a two lot split, but in some communities the neighbors have had some concerns with so staff is looking at the subdivision only with flag lots going through a public hearing process. Commissioner BUCKNAM likes the fact that there is administrative review because it frees up time for more substantial cases. He feels that maybe the public is wanting to be notified about such flag lot subdivisions and they were not. Mr. Johnstone agreed and added there will probably not be too many cases heard regarding flag lots. Commissioner VOS asked how a flag lot would differ from adding an accessory dwelling unit to a property. Mr. Johnstone said that a flag lot is a legal residential lot with a dwelling. He explained the lot being subdivided could eventually have two separate owners. Ms. Mikulak added that the flag log is not a secondary lot, it will have to meet all the development standards like the front lot in terms of area and width. She said it has to be a developable lot. Commissioner OHM asked if there could be a neighborhood average to determine lot width and size that could trigger noticing for a subdivision. Mr. Johnstone explained that subdivision are considered ministerial actions, meaning that if all the boxes are checked it should be approved. There is not much discretion, the owner is still complying with the zoning that is already in place and that is why there is not a notice sent to the neighbors, but there will be with the new ordinance for any subdivision containing a flag lot. Ms. Mikulak added that the zoning is in place and neighbors are not notified for building a garage or a shed for example, which is also the same for a minor two lot subdivision; if all the boxes for the development standards can be checked, then there is no notification. Commissioner Peterson asked if the pole of the flag lot is included in the minimum lot size. Mr. Johnstone explained it is included, but staff still makes sure the lot is buildable and a variance would not be supported after a lot has just been created. Planning Commission Minutes - 11 — January 17, 2019 It was moved by Commissioner PETERSON and seconded by Commissioner OHM to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. ZOA-18-05, a proposed ordinance amending Chapter 26 to regulate the creation of flag lots. Motion carried 7-0. 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS Ms. Mikulak mentioned there will be Planning Commission meeting on February 7 and the March 21 meeting will include a study session with the NRS. She added there will be an online survey that will be out in February and a study session with City Council on March 18. 10. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner LEO to adjourn the meeting at 9:25 p.m. Motion carried 7-0. Alan Bucknam, Chair Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes January 17, 2019 -12— `f A41 TO: CASE MANAGER: CASE NO. & NAME: Wh6atRjLd e g CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT Planning Commission MEETING DATE: February 7, 2019 Lauren Mikulak WZ-18-07, WZ-18-08 and WS -18-02 / Ridgetop Village ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) with approval of an associated Outline Development Plan (ODP), Specific Development Plan (SDP), and subdivision plat for the construction of a 38 -unit townhome project LOCATION OF REQUEST: 4000, 4042, 4062, and 4066 Upham Street APPLICANT (S): Upham Partners, LLC OWNER (S): Upham Partners, LLC APPROXIMATE AREA: 80,029 square feet or 1.84 acres (net size) PRESENT ZONING: Residential -Three (R-3) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Location Map Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST This request is for approval of three related applications for the purpose of developing a 38 -unit townhome project. The specific case numbers and applications are: • Case No. WZ-18-17 —Request for approval of a zone change from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) • Case No. WZ-18-18 — Request for approval of a Specific Development Plan (SDP), and • Case No. WS -18-02 —Request for approval of a 38 -lot major subdivision. Rezoning to a planned development in the City of Wheat Ridge entails approval of two documents. The first is the Outline Development Plan, which, if approved, changes the zoning designation on the land, establishes allowed uses and development standards for the property, and establishes access configurations for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles. The second document is the Specific Development Plan (SDP), which focuses on specific details of a development such as site design, architecture, landscaping, and drainage design. The SDP must be found to be compliant with the ODP in order to be approved. Section 26-302 of the Municipal Code allows for concurrent or sequential applications for the ODP and SDP, and also allows for concurrent review of the SDP and plat. In this case, the applicant is requesting concurrent review of all three applications: ODP, SDP, and plat (Exhibit 1, Applicant Proposal). All three documents must be reviewed at a public hearing before the Planning Commission who will make its recommendations to City Council. The three documents are inextricably related, and for that reason are presented together in this staff report. Three separate motions are provided. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY The subject property is located on the east side of Upham Street between W. 38"' Avenue and W. 44u' Avenue. The property is currently comprised of four lots, each containing a single-family home (Exhibit 2, Aerial). The homes are small by contemporary standards and particularly small relative to their respective lots. A summary of conditions is provided in the table below; all data in the table comes from the Jefferson County Assessor. Address Lot Size House Size Year Built Condition 4000 Upham 18,121 sf (0.416 ac) 1,053 sf 1952 Average 4042 Upham 25,439 sf (0.584 ac) 1,240 sf 1928 Fair 4062 Upham 21,780 sf 0.500 ac 699 sf 1947 Fair 4066 Upham 21,780 sf (0.500 ac) 1,072 sf 1940 Fair The applicant purchased all four lots in mid -2018, and the total size is 1.9 acres. The property is flat and nearly square with 264 feet of frontage on Upham Street and a depth of 308 feet. Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village The subject property is zoned Residential -Three (R-3) and is immediately surrounded by residential zoning, including R-2 and R-3 (Exhibit 3, Zoning Map). The R-3 zoning designation allows for single-, two-, or multi -family development up to 12 units per acre. The R-3 district is established to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable medium to high-density residential neighborhoods, and to prohibit activities of any nature which are incompatible with the medium to high-density residential character Upham Street is '/2 -mile in length between 38"' and 44"' Avenues and includes a wide mix of land uses (Exhibit 4, Land Use and Exhibit 5, Site Photos). The subject property is in the middle third of this block. Immediately to the north is a 2'/2 -story apartment building, which was constructed in 1960 and includes 23 units. Further north along Upham are a mix of single-family homes and duplexes as well as the four-story Town Center Apartment buildings at 44"' Avenue. Across Upham Street to the west of the subject property are three mid-century apartment complexes and two single-family homes. The densities for the multifamily projects immediately surrounding the subject site range from 20 to 26 units per acre. Those that exceed the City's maximum 21 dwelling units per acre are considered legally nonconforming because they predate the City's incorporation. Immediately to the south of the subject property is a single-family home zone R-3. Further south, Upham transitions from a residential neighborhood to mixed use as it approaches 38u' Avenue. Land uses include an office building, fire station, Stevens Elementary, and the four-story West End 38 mixed use development. Zoning at the south end of the block is Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) and Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C). Behind the subject property to the east is a campus owned by Jeffco Public Schools including Stevens Elementary, Sobesky Academy, and outdoor play fields. The school property is approximately 19 acres in size and extends to Reed Street. III. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Attached is a copy of the proposed Outline Development Plan (ODP) which contains two sheets (Exhibit 6, Outline Development Plan). The first page is a typical cover page with certification and signature blocks for the property owners, and Planning Commission, City Council, and Mayor. Also on the first page is a character of development statement, list of permitted uses, and other standard notes. The second page incudes the conceptual layout of the property, including right-of-way, alley, and open space locations. Development Standards The cover sheet includes the development standards that will govern future development on the site. These are typically expressed as parameters (minimums and maximums) with references to the code sections with which the development will comply. The development standards are summarized here: • Uses — The applicant has proposed a townhome development in which the only permitted primary uses are townhome units and open space. Accessory uses are limited to home occupations and household pets which are customary in all residential zone districts. The ODP prohibits detached accessory structures and RV/boat storage within the development, which is also typical of the City's more recent PRDs. Planning Commission 3 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village • Maximum Height— The proposed maximum height is 35 feet which is consistent with the maximum height in the City's residential zone districts. • Maximum Units/Density —The ODP proposes a maximum of 38 townhomes which results in a density of 20.8 dwelling units per acre. Maximum allowable density for a PRD is 21 dwelling units per acre, consistent with the City Charter. Minimum Setbacks — The ODP proposes to orient townhomes toward Upham Street with a minimum front setback of 15 feet. Side setbacks for the westernmost units along Upham are proposed to be 10 feet, but side setbacks increase to a minimum of 20 feet for the rest of the site. This was intentional to provide additional buffering particularly for the single-family home to the south. Rear setbacks are proposed at a minimum of 5 feet where adjacent to the Jeffco Schools drainage facility. Parking — The ODP requires that the townhomes are wide enough to accommodate two -car garages for each unit. This is consistent with the R-3 standard which requires spaces based on bedrooms (2 spaces for every 2 or 3 bedroom unit). Additionally, the ODP requires 9 off- street parking spaces. This roughly equates to 1 visitor space for every 8 spaces. This exceeds the typical R-3 standard of 1 visitor space for every 10 parking spaces. Open Space/Landscaping — The OPD proposes 30% open space which is consistent with R-3 multifamily requirements. R-3 standards do not require that open space be consolidated or amenitized, but the intent of a Planned Development is to provide elevated designs and unique developments. To that end, a unique feature of the ODP is the requirement for a community park in the central portion of the development (labeled as use area B). Additionally, as noted in the character statement, this project is unique in providing fenced, landscaped front yards for all townhome units. Artificial turf in limited areas are permitted in front yards. General planting requirements (eg numbers of shrubs, trees, plant sizes) will comply with the City's zoning code. Architecture and Site Design — The character of the project is intended to incorporate contemporary and traditional elements with references to mid-century modern architecture. To that end, the ODP proposes slight modifications to the Architectural and Site Design Manual that correspond with and memorialize this architectural approach. Code compliance — In all other areas, the project is proposed to comply with the zoning code including related to lighting, signage, fencing, streetscape design, and setback encroachments (eg chimneys, eaves). Conceptual Layout The second sheet of the ODP provides a sketch plan of the development which indicates two access points on Upham, with buildings located along the north, west, and south perimeter of the site. Two access points have been required by the West Metro Fire District, and the internal loop road configuration also meets water district requirements. Because the ODP and SDP are being processed concurrently, the specific site design is further described below in Section V. Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-303.D. The Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. As described above, the proposed development is a compatible land use and density with the surrounding land uses, and the investment provides a new housing type for the area which does not have any townhome development in this block or nearby. The project follows other public and private investments on the nearby 38"' Avenue Main Street corridor. The zoning and new housing stock will likely add value. The site design, setbacks, and proposed open space promote will add visual enhancement and appropriate buffering. The Planned Residential Development zoning is expected to have a positive impact on the neighborhood from a property value perspective. The proposed zoning complies with safety and access requirements of the fire district. The project will not result in significant adverse effects on the surrounding area Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 2. The development proposed on the subject property is not feasible under any other zone district, and would require an unreasonable number of variances or waivers and conditions. Most of the proposed development standards comply with the existing R-3 zoning, however because the density exceeds 12 units per acre, the development is not feasible under any straight residential zone district. Because the site exceeds one acre in size, it is only eligible to be rezoned to a mixed use or planned development district. Given the proposed use and surrounding conditions, the PRD zoning is the most appropriate zone change option. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 3. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All of the service providers and utility districts have indicated that they have no concerns with the proposal and have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. The width of Upham Street in front of the property is currently substandard, and a right-of-way dedication will be required as part of the subdivision plat. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 4. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one 1 of the following conditions exists: Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. Envision Wheat Ridge, the City's 2009 comprehensive plan, is organized around six key values, one of which is to "promote vibrant neighborhoods and an array of housing options." With single family homes, duplexes, new market -rate apartments, mid-century apartments, and income- and age -restricted apartments; Upham Street already has an incredible diversity of housing options. The provision of a townhome product introduces a complementary option that reflects the key value of the comprehensive plan. Within Envision Wheat Ridge, the Structure Plan map provides high-level guidance for achieving the City's vision by designating development priorities and future land areas (Exhibit 7, Adopted Plans). The "mixed use town center" designation encompasses the east side of Wadsworth and extends toward Upham Street. The west side of Upham is designated "neighborhood transition" which reflects this close proximity to Wadsworth. The east side of Upham is designated "neighborhood," and 38ffi Avenue to the south is designated as a "main street." This multitude of designations surrounding the subject property, reflect and call for the diversity of land uses on Upham Street. The proposed zone change is consistent with these designations, and the townhome project supports the City's stated goals of increasing options for homeownership and attracting a range of household types. The comprehensive plan identifies 38"' Avenue as a priority reinvestment corridor. To that end, the City's 38"' Avenue Subarea Plan was adopted in 2011. The vision statement for the corridor calls for "a strong identity and robust commercial and residential markets." The proposed rezoning contributes to a stronger residential market in the area, which in turn attracts a more robust commercial market to the 38a' Avenue corridor. The Subarea Plan also identifies a series of sub -districts. The subject property is within the areas denoted as "Downtown Wheat Ridge" and "Wadsworth Town Center" (Exhibit 7, -. These designations call for and recognize a mix of uses and higher intensity development as compared with the "Residential" sub -district and neighborhoods further east. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is in error. Staff finds no evidence of an error on the official zoning maps. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing character of the area. The area has long included a mix of housing types, ages, and densities. The proposed zone change responds to the more recent public and private investments that bookend Upham Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village Street at 38"' and 441' Avenues. The investments and changes complement the diversity of land uses in the area and strengthen the residential market. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan. Staff finds no evidence of an unanticipated need. The proposed zone change responds directly to goals identified in the comprehensive plan. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request. V. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Specific Development Plan is comprised of 16 sheets and provides details regarding site design, building design, landscaping, and lighting (Exhibit 8, Specific Development Plan). In addition, the SDP includes details on fencing, furnishing, light fixtures, and a utility plan. In addition to standard certification and signature blocks, the site data table on the cover sheet confirms the SDP complies with the development standards provided by the ODP. Key components of the site design are described below and explained in the applicant's proposal letter (Exhibit 1, Applicant Proposal). Site Design The 38 proposed townhomes are distributed among nine buildings ranging in size from two to six units. There is some variety among unit widths, but all accommodate a standard width two -car garage and all are alley loaded. In addition, all townhomes have front yards, which is a unique feature amid the townhome developments the City has recently reviewed. The yards are enclosed by a low fence and have concrete patios. These are best illustrated in the artistic renderings provided in (Exhibit 9, Renderings). Alleys are arranged in a grid and are designed at the minimum possible width to allow more open space elsewhere on the site and in front yards. The central community park is encircled by specialty paving and visitor parking and also includes bicycle parking, mail kiosks, and benches. Sidewalks extend along the fronts of all units and connect out to a new sidewalk along the Upham Street frontage. These sidewalks are illuminated by downcast bollards and pathway lights (shown on sheets 15 and 16). The project provides 76 garage spaces, 9 off-street visitor spaces (including one accessible space), and 8 on -street spaces. The developer will be responsible for constructing curb, gutter, and attached sidewalk along Upham where none exists today, and the consolidation of four existing driveways to two increases the existing on -street parking by two spaces. On -street parking is common on Upham Street, especially recently throughout the construction of the nearby West End 38 project. The applicant has responded to staff requests to reduce the size of the central park in order to provide off- street spaces. Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village Architecture The townhomes are proposed to be three stories in height, and the architectural style is intended to include traditional and contemporary design features with elements of mid-century modern design. The elevations include abundant windows, and variations in the roofline include shed and gable designs. Materials include brick, and horizontal and vertical siding. Colors palettes vary to provide interest among the buildings, including two different bricks and several siding and accent colors. Front elevations have variation in plane depth through offsets in the building fagade, recessed entries and window bays, and incorporation of balconies. Publicly visible side and rear elevations, including those adjacent to the central park and Upham also feature enhanced elevations with additional material changes and inset garage doors. The plane changes are best illustrated on SDP sheets 9, 10 and 11. Landscaping The project exceeds the minimum requirements in terms of plant material with 8 street trees along Upham and 42 trees within the site (where only 25 are required by code). Landscape areas include a mix of sod and planting beds. The SDP prescribes the landscaping in the "public" areas including along walking paths, along the perimeter, and within the park All front yards include patios and landscape beds and may be further customized to include additional patio space or dog -friendly artificial turf. A perimeter fence is proposed along the north, east, and south property lines. Drainage The site is relatively flat and there is no storm sewer in Upham Street, so the applicant has worked closely with Jeffco Public Schools to coordinate shared use of an existing detention facility immediately east of the site on the school district's property. The school district has provided written consent to this arrangement and an access and maintenance agreement is prepared be executed if the project is approved by the City. The developer will be responsible for slight modifications to the existing detention design to accommodate the additional volume from the townhome project. VI. SDP CRITERIA Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-305.D. The Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development as stated in section 26-301 of this article. The purpose of utilizing planned development zoning is to provide flexibility while accommodating well-designed, innovative developments that demonstrate efficient use of land and may not be feasible under a standard zone district. The SDP achieves these goals and proposes a particularly unique townhome development with an emphasis on front yard open space that promotes a neighborhood -like character within the development. Staff concludes this criterion has been met. Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village 2. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the design intent or purpose of the approved outline development plan. The SDP is consistent with the intent and character statements of the outline development plan. Staff concludes this criterion has been met. 3. The proposed uses indicated in the specific development plan are consistent with the uses approved by the outline development plan. The SDP is consistent with the use standards of the outline development plan. Staff concludes this criterion has been met. 4. The site is appropriately designed and is consistent with the development guidelines established in the outline development plan. The SDP is consistent with the development guidelines of the outline development plan in all respects including related to height, density, setbacks, parking, landscaping, lighting, fencing, signage and building design. Staff concludes this criterion has been met. 5. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the subject property, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at the developers' expense. Staff concludes this criterion has been met. 6. The proposed specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual, Streetscape Design Manual, and other applicable design standards. The SDP is in substantial compliance with the site design and multifamily building design standards of the Architectural and Site Design Manual (chapters 3 and 4.2). These standards relate specifically to pedestrian connectivity, building placement, open space design, fagade design, roof forms, building materials, and windows. Because Upham is classified as a local street, the Streetscape Design Manual does not apply, however, the proposed private street trees are consistent with the manual's guidance relative to these plantings. Staff concludes this criterion has been met. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate the SDP support the request. Planning Commission Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village VII. SUBDIVISION PLAT The proposed plat document consists of three pages. The first page includes a legal description of the property; signature blocks for the owner, City, surveyor and County; and standard declarations and notes. The second page includes the proposed lot layout, including lot lines, tracts, and easements (Exhibit 10, Proposed Plat). Lot Configuration The second sheet shows the proposed lot configuration. As noted above the site is nearly square in shape at approximately 264 feet in width and 308 feet in depth. The lot layout corresponds to the SDP with establishment of 38 townhome lots. Because of the proposed yard spaces, the lots are larger than the building footprints, and several lots are irregular in shape or oversized because of additional side yard space (this includes Lots 1, 3, 6, 7, 11, 16, 21, 22, 27, 30, 33, 34, and 38). Neither the ODP, nor the zoning code establish a minimum size or width for attached townhome lots. A plat note on the cover sheet restricts the property from being developed as anything other than townhomes. Tract Configuration A series of nine tracts are established for a variety of purposes in the development. The purpose of each tract is noted in a table on sheet one; they include: • Tracts A, B, D, F, G and H correspond to the locations of sidewalks and/or plantings and are denoted for access. • Tract C corresponds to the alley locations and is denoted for access. • Tract E corresponds to the location of the community park, parking, and loop road and is denoted as such. • Tract I includes the area being dedicated for right-of-way (ROW). When new lots are created through the City's subdivision process, staff reviews adjacent street improvements to confirm that they meet current roadway standards. Upham is considered to be substandard in width, so the majority of Tract I dedicates 6.5 feet in width. This will enable the developer to provide on -street parking, curb, gutter, and an attached 5 -foot sidewalk along the frontage of the project. The southern portion of Tract I is wider and effectively dedicates the eastern half of Upham Street because it was never officially dedicated to the City and has existed as a prescriptive easement. Easements The third sheet of the proposed subdivision shows the easements that traverse the site. Wheat Ridge is not a full-service city, so the applicant has been actively working with utility providers to identify where wet and dry utility service will be located. Water and sanitation easements are shown as coterminous with the internal alleys. These easements will be recorded by separate document but cross-referenced on this sheet in the provided blanks. The applicant is actively working with Neel designers who requires that appropriate dry utility easements be provided by separate document upon completion of final design. Given that utility coordination is often ongoing through a development process, staff has recommended a standard condition that any additional utility information that is available prior to recordation be updated accordingly on the plat. Drainage easements are provided at the far eastern end of the property where inlet structures convey flows to the offsite detention facility. A note on the cover sheet provides a blanket cross access easement over all tracts within the property boundary, including for alleys, sidewalks and the park. Planning Commission 10 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village Homeowners ' Association Because of the maintenance obligation of tracts, the City typically requires formation of a Homeowners' Association (HOA). A standard condition of approval requires staff review of HOA covenants to ensure maintenance of common areas and drainage. The applicant has expressed an interest in potentially forming a metropolitan district to serve this function. Formation of such a district would be subject to City Council review and approval. Notes on the cover sheet of the plat allow for either an HOA or metro district. Fees in Lieu ofParkland Pursuant to Section 26-414 of the Code of Laws, parkland dedication is required for all new residential subdivisions. When land is not dedicated for a public park, a fee in lieu of parkland is required. The Parks Department has indicated that fees in lieu of land dedication will be required, and the City adopted fee amount is $2,497.29 per unit. Credit is given for the four pre-existing single family homes, so the total fee owed will be $84,907.86. This fee is required to be paid at the time of plat recording as a condition of approval. VIII. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING & PUBLIC INPUT Pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Code of Laws, the applicant notified all property owners and residents within 600 feet of the site of the neighborhood meeting. Neighborhood meetings are required prior to submittal of an application for a zone change. The neighborhood input meeting was held on January 16, 2018. Nine members of the public attended the meeting in addition to the applicant and staff. Reactions to the conceptual designs included positive, neutral, and negative comments. Questions were related to site and building design, potential prices, parking, and timing. A full summary of the meeting is attached in Exhibit 11, Neighborhood Meeting Notes. Public noticing is required prior to public hearings, and as of February 1, three letters of support have been submitted. They are attached as Exhibit 12, Public Comment. If any comments are provided prior to the Planning Commission public hearing on February 7, they will be entered into the record and distributed to Commissioners at the public hearing. IX. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change, ODP, SDP, and subdivision, specifically regarding the ability to serve the property. Referral responses follow: Wheat Ridge Public Works: The ODP, SDP, plat and supporting technical documents have been reviewed and approved. Wheat Ridge Parks & Recreation: Fees in lieu of parkland dedication are required. Wheat Ridge Building Division: No comments provided. Coordination will continue through development. Planning Commission 11 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village West Metro Fire District: Can serve, proposed access and hydrant design is acceptable. Coordination will continue through development. Xcel Energy: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing. Century Link: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing. Comcast Cable: No comments provided. Utility coordination is ongoing. Wheat Ridge Water District: No comments provided. Utility coordination is ongoing. Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing. Jeffco Public Schools: Coordination on drainage design is ongoing. X. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Regarding the zone change request and Outline Development Plan, Staff concludes that the proposed zone change promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. Staff further concludes that utility infrastructure is adjacent to and can serve the property at the developer's expense. Finally, Staff concludes that the zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's adopted plans by diversifying housing stock and household types and by providing homeownership opportunities. Because the zone change evaluation criteria support the zone change request, Staff recommends approval of the zone change. Regarding the Specific Development Plan, Staff has concluded that the proposed SDP is consistent with the planned development regulations, with the goals and policies of the City's guiding documents, and with the proposed ODP. Because the review criteria support the SDP, Staff recommends approval of the Specific Development Plan. Regarding the subdivision plat, Staff concludes that the proposed subdivision is compliant with subdivision regulations (Article VI of the zoning code) and with the proposed zoning regulations. Staff further concludes that the subdivision plat results in a logical lot layout for the proposed development and that all utility agencies can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. For these reasons, Staff recommends approval of the plat with the conditions listed below. Planning Commission 12 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village XI. SUGGESTED MOTIONS — ZONE CHANGE Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-18-17, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential -Three to Planned Residential Development with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at 4000 to 4066 Upham Street, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed zoning is consistent with the intent of a planned development, compatible with surrounding land uses, and will result in a high-quality development. 4. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request. Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-18-17, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential -Three to Planned Residential Development with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at 4000 to 4066 Upham Street, for the following reasons: 2. ... XII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS — SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-18-18, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan on property located at 4000 to 4066 Upham Street, for the following reasons: 1. The specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development, as stated in Section 26-301 of the Code of Laws. 2. The specific development plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the outline development plan. 3. The proposed uses are consistent with those approved by the outline development plan. 4. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at the developers' expense. 5. The specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the outline development plan and with the City's adopted design manuals. Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-18-18, a request for approval of a Specific Development Plan on property located at 4000 to 4066 Upham Street, for the following reasons: 2. ... Planning Commission 13 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village XIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS — SUBDIVISION Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WS- 18-02, a request for approval of a 38 -lot major subdivision plat for property located at 4000 to 4066 Upham Street, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the subdivision regulations have been met. 2. The plat is consistent with zoning on the property. 3. Utility districts can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. With the following conditions: 1. Sheet 2 shall be updated prior to the City Council public hearing to remove the existing parcel line between 4062 and 4066 Upham Street. 2. Note 4 shall be updated prior to recordation to indicate the current zoning as PRD. 3. The applicant shall continue to coordinate utility service with the appropriate agencies and any updated information regarding dry utility easements shall be reflected on the plat at recordation. 4. The developer shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement prior to recordation of the subdivision plat. 5. The developer shall pay parks fees at the time of plat recording in the amount of $84,907.86. 6. The Homeowners' Association covenants and/or metropolitan district service plan shall be reviewed by Staff prior to issuance of a building permit." Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WS- 18-02, a request for approval of a 38 -lot subdivision plat for property located at 4000 to 4066 Upham Street, for the following reasons: 1. 2. ... Planning Commission 14 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village EXHIBIT 1: APPLICANT PROPOSAL see attached Planning Commission 15 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village UPNAM PARTNERS LLC - 4251 KIPLING ST, SUITE 310, WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 January 28, 2019 RidgeTop Village - Development and Project Vision Overview RidgeTop Village is comprised of approximately 1.84 acres, currently zoned R-3. The subject addresses currently include 4 single family detached residential homes built in the 1940's - 1950's, and are in poor condition. The adjacent properties to the site include a mix of single story and 2.5 story post World War II apartment style buildings, a few isolated single-family homes, an office building, Stevens Elementary School and West Metro fire station. The general vicinity would best be described as transitional as you move south to 38th Avenue. Our proposal is to build a 38 unit, fee simple town home project that supports the long term redevelopment plans along 38th Avenue, contributes and benefits from the new mixed-use developments currently under constriction nearby and is compatible with the surrounding area. The recent influx of both public and private investment near the intersection of Wadsworth and 38th Avenue has recently changed the dynamic to enhance the 38th Avenue corridor. The recently opened "Corners" project and two high density apartment projects under construction are creating a diversity of housing types in the immediate area. The lack of for -sale new home product in the area was a major factor in our decision to purchase the property and pursue the zone change. We felt the time was right to introduce this product to the area. We embraced the City's vision in reviewing the two major redevelopment plans for the area and recognized there was a dynamic energy along the western portion of 38th Avenue. The project site is just outside the confluence of The 38th Corridor Plan and the Wadsworth Boulevard Redevelopment Plan. Located just north of 38th Avenue and a short drive or walk to Wadsworth Boulevard creates a very unique opportunity to provide a high-density residential project to take advantage of the redeveloping commercial corridors nearby. The site is currently zoned R-3 which promotes medium density land uses. The site is surrounded by other R-3 Zoned parcels and the existing apartment projects have densities similar to the density proposed. This change of zone will enable opportunities for unique live work environments along with nearby shopping and recreation opportunities. The added density allowed under a PRD will help support the nearby commercial uses along 38th and Wadsworth while maintaining the integrity of the adjacent R-3 residential uses. Site Planning During our due diligence and preliminary site planning we discovered that the property naturally surface flows to the east but was eventually impeded by the raised sports fields of Stevens Elementary School. Within these sports fields was an existing storm water detention basin built at the time to accommodate the needs of the school site. We contacted the facilities department for Jeffco School District to investigate the opportunity to accept drainage from our property and received supportive initial feedback. We then did additional engineering studies and worked in conjunction with Jeffco schools to further refine the concept. We have received preliminary approval from Jeffco schools to proceed with the design. The ability to use an off-site stormwater basin resulted in the unique opportunity to create a project with additional open space and building separation all while effectively maximizing the allowable UPNAM PARTNERS LLC - 4251 KIPLING ST, SUITE 310, WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 density under the PRD Zoning. Having the centrally located park with units flanking the perimeter will create a greater sense of privacy, pride of ownership, and attractive views of the park for many of the units. The units in Buildings 5 and 6 will be the only two buildings directly facing each other. However, that creates a landscaped corridor that leads both physically and visually to the park and the two complement each other very well. The other major feature of RidgeTop Village which is very unique to other town home projects is the addition of a private landscaped yard area for each unit. Buyers are looking for outdoor living space, areas for entertaining, a place for a pet or child to play, and the ability to personalize their space such as a vegetable garden. All while still having a low maintenance requirement. Street Scene The street scene along Upham was one of the most important design features of the project. We originally intended to have a single point of access but during our due diligence and preliminary site planning we were informed that the water districts would require a loop system for this size of a project. That resulted in also having two vehicular points of access to coincide with the water loop. In working with adjacent owners, they were sensitive to not having a roadway against the property lines so we worked to put a duplex on the north and south side of the frontage and a fourplex in the middle. The result is only three buildings, 8 units, and less massing along the street. Having a duplex adjacent to the SFR to the south was determined to be the most compatible building type and creates a very unique street scene that is unique to the rest of the project. Set Backs Careful consideration was given to the building setbacks proposed for the project. The setback along Upham is 15' and will enhance the pedestrian scale along the street. The setback will contain the low fenced private yards creating a very social environment for pedestrians and residents. At the very initial neighborhood meeting we heard from the homeowners across the street that they did not want a truly urban setting with minimum or zero lot line along Upham. Our north and south setbacks are varied. For the units along Upham only those two duplexes are 10' from their adjacent Property Line and is constricted to be just the initial 25% of the side Property Line. The remaining 75% of the side Property Line is restricted to have a 20' setback. This was done to have a more compatible environment to the adjacent neighbors. By having the private yards and common area landscaping we were able to accomplish very attractive buffer to the adjacent owners for privacy and massing concerns. Parking Each townhome includes an attached 2 car garage, there are 9 guest parking spaces centrally located at the center of the project adjacent to the park. The parking along Upham Street is also improved due to the reduction of curb cuts from four to two and increases the amount of on -street parking from currently 6 spaces to 8 spaces. During the SDP review process and working with staff the project evolved to increase the guest parking around the park along with suggested floor plan revisions to the product to effectively make the garages wider and more capable for 2 cars, garbage & recycling bins, and additional storage. The minimum width of the units was increased from 17' to 20' wide. Overall parking ratio onsite is 2.24/unit. UPNAM PARTNERS LLC - 4251 KIPLING ST, SUITE 310, WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 Buyer Profile The target buyer for these units are anticipated to be single professionals, young couples and first time homebuyers. Young families will also consider RidgeTop Village due to the ample on- site open space, private yard area and proximity to the Stevens Middle School. Their buying decisions are based on being a short distance from restaurants and amenities, near transportation corridors and employment centers. Our focus is to also remain affordable to the first-time homebuyer yet offer a slightly larger unit for the money. With the inclusion of the added open space features we feel we will be in strong demand to one of the few for -sale projects in the vicinity. The size of the project will also be attractive as there will be a greater sense of community, pride of ownership, opportunity for block parties and other neighborhood activities. Architectural Design The inspiration to the design of the townhome units came from many nearby examples within Wheat Ridge of Mid -Century Modern architecture. Design features include horizontal design features, shed roof lines, colors, materials, fence details, and front doors. Units will range from 1600 sf to 1790 sf with three distinct floor plans with 2-3 bedrooms. The majority of the units (79%) will be 2 bedrooms with the remaining units 3 bedrooms. There will be a diversity of building types throughout the project with duplex, 4, 5 and 6 plex buildings. To further enhance the variety within the project there are two color schemes proposed with color variations of brick, paint, and roof materials. We feel this will create a more attractive project that does not appear monotonous to those both living in the community and viewing it from Upham Street Private Yards Based on the market research and demographics of the target buyer profile our vision was to create a ground level outdoor living space for each homeowner. The intent was always to go beyond conventional decks and balconies as commonly used in numerous other Townhome projects. We wanted to create a truly private yard that can be furnished, decorated, customized, and used for outdoor living to suit the buyers' personal needs. A low wooden fence and gate will be installed to physically establish the areas. We intend to offer three pre- selected landscape designs buyers can choose from three pre -determined designs including hardscape, artificial turf, and a more xeriscape option. These yards range in depth from 12-15 feet. We look forward to working with Wheat Ridge's Planning, Zoning, and Building Departments on this exciting new endeavor. Neil Shea Managing Partner — Upham Partners LLC EXHIBIT 2: AERIAL The subject site is located at 4000 4066 Upharn Street and is outlived in blue. Planning Commission 17 CaseNos. WZ18-O, WZ18-18, WS 18-02/Zddgetop Rllage EXHIBIT 3: ZONING MAP The subject site is located at 4000 4066 Upharn Street and is outlived in blue. A Planning Commission 18 CaseNos. WZ18-O, WZ18-18, WS 18-02/Zddgetop Rllage sll F- r - . H Public Commercial — _ W 38TH AVE 1 a_ Is I/\ EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS Looking north on Upham Street. The southernmost of the existing homes (4000 Upham) is on the right hand side; all four existing homes are in this image. Planning Commission 20 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZI&1$ WS- I&02/Ridgetop IWage Panoramic view looking north along Upham from the south side of the site. The existing two story apartments are visible on the left side of the image, and the existing brick single-family home immediately south of the subject site is visible on the right side of the image in the shade. Panoramic view looking north along Upham from the north side of the site. The existing 21/22 story brick apartments immediately north of the subj ect site are visible on the left side of the image, and on the right side are the existing single-storyp multifamily apartments. Planning Commission 22 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZI&1$ WS- I&02/Ridgelop IWage EXHIBIT 6: OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN see attached Planning Commission 23 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE BELOW SIGNED OWNER(S), OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN, AND AS MAY OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY LAW. I (WE) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE APPROVAL OF THIS SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-121 OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. NEIL SHEA, MANAGING PARTNER, UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 BY WITNESSED MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) I HEREBY CERTIFY HAT THIS PLAN WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO AT O'CLOCK—M. ON THE DAY OF , A.D., IN BOOK , PAGE , RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, CHARLES N. BECKSTROM, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF RIDGETOP VILLAGE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. (SURVEYOR'S SEAL) APPROVED THIS DAY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL. ATTEST CITY CLERK SIGNATURE MAYOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO DESIGN TEAM: VICINITY MAP RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS DAY OF CHAIRPERSON BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE RIDGETOP VILLAGE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF THIRTY—EIGHT FEE SIMPLE TOWN HOME UNITS CENTERED AROUND A COMMON GREENSPACE AMENITY. THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE CONNECTION POINTS THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE CENTRAL POCKET PARK. RIDGETOP VILLAGE IS LOCATED ON UPHAM STREET, LESS THAN HALF A BLOCK NORTH OF WHEAT RIDGE'S MAIN STREET, 38TH AVENUE. THE APPROXIMATELY 1.84 ACRE SITE WILL COMPLIMENT NEARBY REDEVELOPMENT. THE ARCHITECTURE IS A MARRIAGE OF CONTEMPORARY AND TRADITIONAL STYLES WITH SUBTLE DESIGN ELEMENTS OFFERING HOMAGE TO THE MID—CENTURY MODERN THEME PRESENT AMONG MANY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE WILL BE TWO ENTRY POINTS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT FROM UPHAM STREET WITH STREETSCAPE AND SIGN MONUMENTS TO PROVIDE A SENSE OF ENTRY FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. EACH OWNER WILL ENJOY BOTH PRIVACY OFFERED BY PRIVATE, LOW—FENCED YARDS WITH MINIMALIST LANDSCAPING, AS WELL AS EASY ACCESS TO THE MAIN FOCAL POINT OF THE DEVELOPMENT, A CENTRAL POCKET PARK. THIS GATHERING SPACE OFFERS A GENEROUS SOD LAWN BORDERED BY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, PARK BENCHES, AND SHADE TREES, WHERE RESIDENTS MAY ENTERTAIN, PLAY, AND RELAX. 0 1000 2000 1000' PREPARED BY HANGAR 41- ARCHITECTURE 825 SANTA FE DRIVE DENVER, CO 80204 CONTACT: MATTHEW JOINER, AIA 303.954.0933 MJOINER®HANGAR-41.COM PREPARED FOR UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC 4251 KIPLING STREET, SUITE 310 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 CONTACT: NEIL SHEA 303-870-0533 SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER W W 1 COVER SHEET 2 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN 10' FOR FRONT 25%, (AS SHOWN) 20' FOR REAR 75% (AS SHOWN) MINIMUM REAR SETBACK 5' (AS SHOWN) MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 30% MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE NO MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED PER 1, 2, OR 3 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 2 SPACES VISITOR PARKING SPACES W W BICYCLE PARKING 44 E TH AVE y= 0 )N z ZLu �jN N M z Q 'N PROJECT S ITE Lu o Q l� W �cc n jl 4 11 T A VEJNf_ f —F T V O m Z N O Q C7 0 �o� a O Z It 3 TH A V NUE � M w D w N C) 0 U M WW Z o BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. THE RIDGETOP VILLAGE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF THIRTY—EIGHT FEE SIMPLE TOWN HOME UNITS CENTERED AROUND A COMMON GREENSPACE AMENITY. THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE CONNECTION POINTS THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE CENTRAL POCKET PARK. RIDGETOP VILLAGE IS LOCATED ON UPHAM STREET, LESS THAN HALF A BLOCK NORTH OF WHEAT RIDGE'S MAIN STREET, 38TH AVENUE. THE APPROXIMATELY 1.84 ACRE SITE WILL COMPLIMENT NEARBY REDEVELOPMENT. THE ARCHITECTURE IS A MARRIAGE OF CONTEMPORARY AND TRADITIONAL STYLES WITH SUBTLE DESIGN ELEMENTS OFFERING HOMAGE TO THE MID—CENTURY MODERN THEME PRESENT AMONG MANY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE WILL BE TWO ENTRY POINTS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT FROM UPHAM STREET WITH STREETSCAPE AND SIGN MONUMENTS TO PROVIDE A SENSE OF ENTRY FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. EACH OWNER WILL ENJOY BOTH PRIVACY OFFERED BY PRIVATE, LOW—FENCED YARDS WITH MINIMALIST LANDSCAPING, AS WELL AS EASY ACCESS TO THE MAIN FOCAL POINT OF THE DEVELOPMENT, A CENTRAL POCKET PARK. THIS GATHERING SPACE OFFERS A GENEROUS SOD LAWN BORDERED BY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, PARK BENCHES, AND SHADE TREES, WHERE RESIDENTS MAY ENTERTAIN, PLAY, AND RELAX. 0 1000 2000 1000' PREPARED BY HANGAR 41- ARCHITECTURE 825 SANTA FE DRIVE DENVER, CO 80204 CONTACT: MATTHEW JOINER, AIA 303.954.0933 MJOINER®HANGAR-41.COM PREPARED FOR UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC 4251 KIPLING STREET, SUITE 310 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 CONTACT: NEIL SHEA 303-870-0533 SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 COVER SHEET 2 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN 10' FOR FRONT 25%, (AS SHOWN) 20' FOR REAR 75% (AS SHOWN) MINIMUM REAR SETBACK SITE DATA TABLE ZONING PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) LAND USE TOWNHOMES NUMBER OF UNITS 38 CASE HISTORY WZ-18-17 WZ-18-18 WS -18-02 OWNER/APPLICANT UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC 4251 KIPLING STREET, SUITE 310 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 CONTACT: NEIL SHEA 303-870-0533 neil®visionacquisitions.com CIVIL ENGINEER BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING LLC 3253 NORTH GAYLORD STREET DENVER, CO 80205 CONTACT: JESSE DONOVAN, PE 720-540-8629 jesse@brightlightereng.com ARCHITECT HANGAR 41, LLC 825 SANTA FE DRIVE DENVER, CO 80204 CONTACT: MATTHEW JOINER 303-954-0933 mjoiner@hangar-41.com II_1I11I.Y11_1»_1:Zy71IIIIdI OUTDOOR DESIGN GROUP, INC. 590 WEBSTER STREET ARVADA, CO 80002 CONTACT: MATT CORRION, PLA 303-993-4811 mcorrion@odgdesign.com SURVEYOR ENGINEERING SERVICE COMPANY 14190 EAST EVANS AVENUE AURORA, CO 80014 CONTACT: BRETT MILLER, PLS 303-337-1393 x101 bmiller®engineeringserviceco.com GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER A.G. WASSENAAR, INC 2180 SOUTH IVANHOE STREET, SUITE 5 DENVER, CO 80222 CONTACT: KEITH SEATON, PE 303-759-8100 www.agwassenaar.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IIlsmII111[a1]alai [el► C3S ENGINEERING, INC. 1737 CENTRAL STREET, SUITE 201 DENVER, CO 80211 CONTACT: THERESA SANTOS 303-480-5144 theresa®c3sengineeringinc.com DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 1. USE AREAS: i. USE AREA "A" AS TOWNHOME UNITS DEFINED AS LOTS 1-38 DISTRIBUTED INTO 9 BUILDINGS ii. USE AREA "B" AS THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND SHALL UTILIZED AS A COMMUNITY PARK iii. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: HOME OCCUPATIONS AND HOUSEHOLD PETS iv. PROHIBITED ACCESSORY USES: ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, RV/BOAT/TRAILER STORAGE 2. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 35 FEET 3. TOWNHOME MAXIMUM DENSITY: 38 UNITS 4. MINIMUM SETBACKS, AS SHOWN ON OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN (MEASURED TO FOUNDATION) i. SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED: a. FRONT SETBACK=15' b. SIDE SETBACK=10' AT FRONT 25%, 20' AT REAR 75% OF LOT FROM PRIMARY STREET FRONT c. REAR SETBACK=5' 5. BUILDING SETBACK ENCROACHMENTS: ARE PERMITTED BY CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26 611 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL CODE. 6. PARKING i. OFF—STREET PARKING: ALL TOWNHOMES WILL HAVE TWO—CAR GARAGES. ii. VISTOR PARKING: a. GUEST PARKING 9 SPACES PER 38 UNITS (.24/UNIT) 71ANDSCAPING i. MINIMUM OPEN SPACE:30% ii. ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-502 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF SHALL BE PERMITTED AS AN OPTION WITHIN PRIVATE FRONT YARDS AS SHOWN IN THE SDP. 8. EXTERIOR LIGHTING: ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 EXTERIOR LIGHTING OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS 9. SIGNAGE: ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII SIGN CODE OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. 10. FENCING: ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 FENCING OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. 11. ARCHITECTURAL AND STREETSCAPE DESIGN i. STREETSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN MANUAL. II. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELEMENTS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ASDM, SECTION 4.3 EXCEPT IN THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: a. FACADE ARTICULATION: a.a. DESIGN SHALL HIGHLIGHT HUMAN SCALE TO EXCEED ASDM REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIATION IN PLAN DEPTH WITH: — RECESSED UNIT ENTRIES THAT EXTEND TO UPPER LEVELS; — UPPER LEVEL RECESSED VOLUMES ON GARAGE FACADES; — DEEP, ATTACHED METAL LEVEL 2 BALCONIES EXTEND OVER GENEROUS LEVEL 1 PATIOS TO CREATE TWO OUTDOOR ROOMS, ONE EXPOSED AND ONE PARTIALLY COVERED; — ROOF LINES WITH VARYING SOFFIT EXTENSIONS AND DEPTH b. MATERIALS: b.a. DESIGN SHALL MODIFY ASDM MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. BRICK SHALL COVER 1/3 MIN., OF THE BUILDING FACADE: — A BRICK PLINTH SHALL INCLUDE SILL AND HEADER HEIGHT BANDS THAT COVER ALL SIDES THE FULL HEIGHT OF LEVEL 1; 2. LAP SIDING SHALL COVER 2/3 MAX., OF THE BUILDING FACADE: — LAP SIDING SHALL INCLUDE VARIETY IN COLOR, DEPTH OF PLANK, AND ORIENTATION TO EMPHASIZE HUMAN SCALE AND VARIETY IN VOLUME, AND UNIQUENESS BETWEEN MULTIPLE BUILDINGS; 3. OPENINGS AND BALCONIES SHALL BE ON 40% MIN. OF BUILDING ENTRY AND GARAGE FACADES — THE PREDOMINANT LENGTH — AND ON NO LESS THAN 15% MIN. OF EACH OF THE BUILDING END FACADES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE EAST ih OF THE NORTHWEST iA OF THE SOUTHWEST X OF THE SOUTHEAST X OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST %; THENCE SOO*14'04"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST ih A DISTANCE OF 132.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOO'14'04"E ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 264.61 FEET; THENCE N89'39'47"E A DISTANCE OF 328.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST THENCE N00'13'09"W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET; THENCE N89'39'47"W A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00'13'09"W ALONG A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 209.63 FEET; THENCE N89'39'59"E ALONG A LINE THAT IS 132.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST % A DISTANCE OF 308.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS (82,849 SQUARE FEET) 1.9020 ACRES. PROJECT NUMBER REQUIRED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 35' MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK 15' (AS SHOWN) MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK 10' FOR FRONT 25%, (AS SHOWN) 20' FOR REAR 75% (AS SHOWN) MINIMUM REAR SETBACK 5' (AS SHOWN) MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 30% MINIMUM PRIVATE OPEN SPACE NO MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED PER 1, 2, OR 3 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 2 SPACES VISITOR PARKING SPACES 9 PER 38 UNITS (.24/UNIT) BICYCLE PARKING 4 PER 38 UNITS (.1/UNIT) CASE HISTORY WZ-18-17 WZ-18-18 WS -18-02 OWNER/APPLICANT UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC 4251 KIPLING STREET, SUITE 310 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 CONTACT: NEIL SHEA 303-870-0533 neil®visionacquisitions.com CIVIL ENGINEER BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING LLC 3253 NORTH GAYLORD STREET DENVER, CO 80205 CONTACT: JESSE DONOVAN, PE 720-540-8629 jesse@brightlightereng.com ARCHITECT HANGAR 41, LLC 825 SANTA FE DRIVE DENVER, CO 80204 CONTACT: MATTHEW JOINER 303-954-0933 mjoiner@hangar-41.com II_1I11I.Y11_1»_1:Zy71IIIIdI OUTDOOR DESIGN GROUP, INC. 590 WEBSTER STREET ARVADA, CO 80002 CONTACT: MATT CORRION, PLA 303-993-4811 mcorrion@odgdesign.com SURVEYOR ENGINEERING SERVICE COMPANY 14190 EAST EVANS AVENUE AURORA, CO 80014 CONTACT: BRETT MILLER, PLS 303-337-1393 x101 bmiller®engineeringserviceco.com GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER A.G. WASSENAAR, INC 2180 SOUTH IVANHOE STREET, SUITE 5 DENVER, CO 80222 CONTACT: KEITH SEATON, PE 303-759-8100 www.agwassenaar.com NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION IIlsmII111[a1]alai [el► C3S ENGINEERING, INC. 1737 CENTRAL STREET, SUITE 201 DENVER, CO 80211 CONTACT: THERESA SANTOS 303-480-5144 theresa®c3sengineeringinc.com DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: 1. USE AREAS: i. USE AREA "A" AS TOWNHOME UNITS DEFINED AS LOTS 1-38 DISTRIBUTED INTO 9 BUILDINGS ii. USE AREA "B" AS THE CENTRAL AREA OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND SHALL UTILIZED AS A COMMUNITY PARK iii. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES: HOME OCCUPATIONS AND HOUSEHOLD PETS iv. PROHIBITED ACCESSORY USES: ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, RV/BOAT/TRAILER STORAGE 2. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 35 FEET 3. TOWNHOME MAXIMUM DENSITY: 38 UNITS 4. MINIMUM SETBACKS, AS SHOWN ON OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN (MEASURED TO FOUNDATION) i. SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED: a. FRONT SETBACK=15' b. SIDE SETBACK=10' AT FRONT 25%, 20' AT REAR 75% OF LOT FROM PRIMARY STREET FRONT c. REAR SETBACK=5' 5. BUILDING SETBACK ENCROACHMENTS: ARE PERMITTED BY CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26 611 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL CODE. 6. PARKING i. OFF—STREET PARKING: ALL TOWNHOMES WILL HAVE TWO—CAR GARAGES. ii. VISTOR PARKING: a. GUEST PARKING 9 SPACES PER 38 UNITS (.24/UNIT) 71ANDSCAPING i. MINIMUM OPEN SPACE:30% ii. ALL LANDSCAPE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-502 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS WITH THE EXCEPTION THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF SHALL BE PERMITTED AS AN OPTION WITHIN PRIVATE FRONT YARDS AS SHOWN IN THE SDP. 8. EXTERIOR LIGHTING: ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 EXTERIOR LIGHTING OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS 9. SIGNAGE: ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII SIGN CODE OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. 10. FENCING: ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 FENCING OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. 11. ARCHITECTURAL AND STREETSCAPE DESIGN i. STREETSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE STREETSCAPE DESIGN MANUAL. II. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN ELEMENTS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ASDM, SECTION 4.3 EXCEPT IN THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS: a. FACADE ARTICULATION: a.a. DESIGN SHALL HIGHLIGHT HUMAN SCALE TO EXCEED ASDM REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIATION IN PLAN DEPTH WITH: — RECESSED UNIT ENTRIES THAT EXTEND TO UPPER LEVELS; — UPPER LEVEL RECESSED VOLUMES ON GARAGE FACADES; — DEEP, ATTACHED METAL LEVEL 2 BALCONIES EXTEND OVER GENEROUS LEVEL 1 PATIOS TO CREATE TWO OUTDOOR ROOMS, ONE EXPOSED AND ONE PARTIALLY COVERED; — ROOF LINES WITH VARYING SOFFIT EXTENSIONS AND DEPTH b. MATERIALS: b.a. DESIGN SHALL MODIFY ASDM MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS: 1. BRICK SHALL COVER 1/3 MIN., OF THE BUILDING FACADE: — A BRICK PLINTH SHALL INCLUDE SILL AND HEADER HEIGHT BANDS THAT COVER ALL SIDES THE FULL HEIGHT OF LEVEL 1; 2. LAP SIDING SHALL COVER 2/3 MAX., OF THE BUILDING FACADE: — LAP SIDING SHALL INCLUDE VARIETY IN COLOR, DEPTH OF PLANK, AND ORIENTATION TO EMPHASIZE HUMAN SCALE AND VARIETY IN VOLUME, AND UNIQUENESS BETWEEN MULTIPLE BUILDINGS; 3. OPENINGS AND BALCONIES SHALL BE ON 40% MIN. OF BUILDING ENTRY AND GARAGE FACADES — THE PREDOMINANT LENGTH — AND ON NO LESS THAN 15% MIN. OF EACH OF THE BUILDING END FACADES. LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE EAST ih OF THE NORTHWEST iA OF THE SOUTHWEST X OF THE SOUTHEAST X OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST %; THENCE SOO*14'04"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST ih A DISTANCE OF 132.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOO'14'04"E ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 264.61 FEET; THENCE N89'39'47"E A DISTANCE OF 328.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST THENCE N00'13'09"W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET; THENCE N89'39'47"W A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00'13'09"W ALONG A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 209.63 FEET; THENCE N89'39'59"E ALONG A LINE THAT IS 132.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST % A DISTANCE OF 308.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS (82,849 SQUARE FEET) 1.9020 ACRES. PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08.20.2018 DESIGNER MJ REVIEWER BP Z O 1 OF 2 co co 0 Ln 0 c rn Lu W Z O z 0 N nZ Q Hwo N vZ W a Q y= 0 )N z ZLu Zc N M z Q 'N O M Q LL Lu o �~ �cc n V f —F T o V) i M Y U c N O Q C7 0 �o� a L<_ Z 1 OF 2 co co co rn W 0 N 0 N z 0 N Q Q Hwo N W uH W y= 0 04 ZLu J Q Q CD J a M > (o Q C7 0 O a 0 Z It w O � M w D w N C) 0 U M WW Z o z w L.L O Q c:) W m H Q z co c 1 OF 2 co co co rn W 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N Q N N O0 O 0 0 04 o z CD J J w Q Q ~com m Z) z co c v, 07 a_ C/) o (/) a Ll 0 0 0 L> O z O Elf 0 o' LL C/) = ° z 0 W m O o r 0 N 0 M 0 �z COVER SHEET 1 OF 2 ADJACENT/TLSTORY MULTI -UNIT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING//////////////, ADJACENT"I -STORY MULT RES DENTAL, BUILDING/////// IT ADJACENT/ , STORY MULTI eESieEraTiaL eUiLeiric j WEST OF PROPERTY ZONING: R-3 ?D..iqCFNT 2-S-ORY MULTI—UNIT RESIDENTIAL BUIUING���������// ADJACENt 2 -STORY MULTI -UNIT RESIDENTIAL B U I L D I N G RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATR DGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO FRONT 25% OF SITE o F • -T - I I 0 � � I • � I I Z I • O � I I L=L, I I H i 34' MAX. PROP. yl 22.0'— BLDG. FTPRNT --------------------- • I f_ • 1 .0'MIN z I �0 �o • I N N � I ADJACENT 3 -STORY MULTI -UNIT RES I DE NORTH OF PROPERTY ZONING: R-3 REAR 75% OF SITE p UNIT ACCESS SIDEWALK �I o N UNIT FRONT YARDS I I O z I I I I I X I Q I I Q �m M I I I I DRIVE AISLE GUEST • I PARKING I � I I I I I I • I I o00 I I • I c oFIRE ACCES% I z I 22.0, COMMUNITY PARK DRIVE ONLY; I O • u- II RAISED 6" I • z II 30.0' I (24.0'MIN)^ 1f 34' MAX. PROP. BLDG. FTPRNT6&, I I / • / • VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING f (INCL. VAN ACC.) 15.0' MIN 0� z DRIVE AISLE IF �O N • I I" I--------------------- • f I Q I i • Z ' elf L,34' MAX. PROP. I? BLDG. FTPRNT --------------------- • 22.0' FRONT 25% OF SITE UNIT FRONT YARDS ' I f I O Z I I � � I X I Q 0 m I Y I N � 5.0' � fI II oz I I X i I I I Q I �o �m ------ I I I I UNIT FRONT YARDS UNIT ACCESS SIDE✓VALK I I UNIT FRONT YARDS - f ---- I _- I Oz I LI I X II I Q I I I m I I I I I I PROJECT DATE 08.20.2018 DESIGNER MJ O Z BP Z Q� 0 N 0 N I I I I � X I I Q Vz :2o *k Jz � Q J m I LU I I..L UNIT FRONT YARDS — 0 0 N r� Z N r O UNIT ACCESS SIDEWALK — . REAR 75% OF SITE SOUTH OF PROPERTY ZONINC R-3 UNIT FRONT YARDS no — • 5.0' LEGEND NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPERTY LINES SETBACK LINES PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT CURB /GUTTER 0 CONCRETE SIDEWALK 0 DRIVE AISLE SURFACE RASIED DRIVE AISLE EXISTING SCHOOL YARD EAST OF PROPERTY ZONING: / R-2 EXISTING DETENTIONPOND TO BE USED FOR PROPOS OFF-SITE DETENTIO of'� SITE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING DETENTION BASEBALL FIELD AND YARD 0 30' 60' G G PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08.20.2018 DESIGNER MJ REVIEWER BP Z 0 2 0F 2 2 R 0 c 0 u rn W Z 0 0 N 0 N U ' n z z � Vz LL *k Jz � Q N LU o I..L z. U 00 O N r� Z �W V r O �0 Q � 00 z a o 0 F U U V S Z.; F O 17 V) m > M sem+r L T N N D 00 0 Po Q > 2 0F 2 2 R W rn W o N 0 N 0 N 0 N Q z � LU M *k JLu Q N LU r I..L 00 O 6) O �W V r O z Q Lu J = D Po > Q cD a) o o z WQ O _ rn � W N 0 M D W o U � W 't [)� Lu Z � 0 z 0 CO Lu m m z U U) c/)C/) Q o a O 2 0F 2 2 R w rn W o N 0 N 0 N 0 N Q O � O M *k *k Q N N r O 00 O 6) O N r r O z Q U Q � m m m z U U) c/)C/) o a O p O w0z z O T D' F O U E_ LL z oLLJ m O 0 N M �� 0 0 0 � z COVER SHEET 2 0F 2 EXHIBIT 7: ADOPTED PLANS This image ism excerpt from the Structure Map within the City's Comprehensive Plan (2009). The Structure Map provides high-level guidance for achieving the City's vision by designating development priorities and future land areas. The location of the subject property is denoted by the star. ■ Public Main Street (38th Ave) ■ Neighborhood Buffer Primary Commercial Corridor (Wadsworth Blvd) Neighborhood O Community Commercial Center - Neighborhood Commercial Corridor (44th Ave) Planning Commission 25 Case Pikes. WZ1&17, 6 I &18, W&1 &021I dgefop Village This image shows the sub -districts identified in the 38ffi Avenue Corridor Plan (2011) which include districts along Wadsworth, 38°h and the surrounding areas. The location of the subject property is again denoted by the star and is within the area designated as "Downtown Wheat Ridge." ................;P."_ ............... NtlOR13r. n.u.......dii HS S3Wtl i r v 0334 v NO1N3d I.tl?1O R +� NVTdVH N m nvr I'MSatlW ONtllM3N 4� L � 1NO1N38 N N i 3StlHJ i U 4. M3d30 NO1N3d I.tl?1O R +� NVTdVH N m nvr I'MSatlW ONtllM3N Planning Commission 26 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-I8-I8, WS -I8-02 /RidgeQ p Village 4� 30831d N i i i 10 HOIH :131131 S OL1 { WtlHdl i� 3 � i� NtlA 3 H.LNOMSOVM Planning Commission 26 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-I8-I8, WS -I8-02 /RidgeQ p Village EXHIBIT 8: SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN see attached Planning Commission 27 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE BELOW SIGNED OWNER(S), OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN, AND AS MAY OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY LAW. I (WE) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE APPROVAL OF THIS SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-121 OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. NEIL SHEA, MANAGING PARTNER, UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC STATE OF COLORADO ) )SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20 BY WITNESSED MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ) HEREBY CERTIFY HAT THIS PLAN WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO AT O'CLOCK .M. ON THE DAY OF , A.D., IN BOOK , PAGE , RECEPTION NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I, CHARLES N. BECKSTROM, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF RIDGETOP VILLAGE WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. SIGNATURE (SURVEYOR'S SEAL) CITY CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS DAY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL. ATTEST CITY CLERK MAYOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO DESIGN TEAM: VICINITY MAP PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS DAY OF CHAIRPERSON Im BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. 1 THE RIDGETOP VILLAGE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF THIRTY-EIGHT FEE SIMPLE TOWN HOME UNITS CENTERED AROUND A COMMON GREENSPACE AMENITY. THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE CONNECTION POINTS THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE CENTRAL POCKET PARK. RIDGETOP VILLAGE IS LOCATED ON UPHAM STREET, LESS THAN HALF A BLOCK NORTH OF WHEAT RIDGE'S MAIN STREET, 38TH AVENUE. THE APPROXIMATELY 1.84 ACRE SITE WILL COMPLIMENT NEARBY REDEVELOPMENT. THE ARCHITECTURE IS A MARRIAGE OF CONTEMPORARY AND TRADITIONAL STYLES WITH SUBTLE DESIGN ELEMENTS OFFERING HOMAGE TO THE MID-CENTURY MODERN THEME PRESENT AMONG MANY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE WILL BE TWO ENTRY POINTS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT FROM UPHAM STREET WITH STREETSCAPE AND SIGN MONUMENTS TO PROVIDE A SENSE OF ENTRY FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. EACH OWNER WILL ENJOY BOTH PRIVACY OFFERED BY PRIVATE, LOW—FENCED YARDS WITH MINIMALIST LANDSCAPING, AS WELL AS EASY ACCESS TO THE MAIN FOCAL POINT OF THE DEVELOPMENT, A CENTRAL POCKET PARK. THIS GATHERING SPACE OFFERS A GENEROUS SOD LAWN BORDERED BY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, PARK BENCHES, AND SHADE TREES, WHERE RESIDENTS MAY ENTERTAIN, PLAY, AND RELAX. o 1000 2000 1" 1000' PREPARED BY BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING 3253 NORTH GAYLORD STREET DENVER, CO 80205 CONTACT: JESSE DONOVAN, PE 720-504-8629 jesse@brightlightereng.com PREPARED FOR UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC 4251 KIPLING STREET, SUITE 310 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 CONTACT: NEIL SHEA 303-870-0533 SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER W 1 COVER SHEET 2 SITE PLAN 3 UTILITY PLAN 4 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 5 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS h ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 7 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS W ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 44 E A lf ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES 11 ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES 12 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANT LIST 13 �. 14 PROJECT SITE SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 16 W Lqe � > 4l T A IGEN E U o J � �w� O CD w Lu O v 3 z Q Lu ij TH A UE Q O U N = z o — LL Q o C) � 0 w U U) Lu o Im BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. 1 THE RIDGETOP VILLAGE PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF THIRTY-EIGHT FEE SIMPLE TOWN HOME UNITS CENTERED AROUND A COMMON GREENSPACE AMENITY. THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE CONNECTION POINTS THROUGHOUT THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE CENTRAL POCKET PARK. RIDGETOP VILLAGE IS LOCATED ON UPHAM STREET, LESS THAN HALF A BLOCK NORTH OF WHEAT RIDGE'S MAIN STREET, 38TH AVENUE. THE APPROXIMATELY 1.84 ACRE SITE WILL COMPLIMENT NEARBY REDEVELOPMENT. THE ARCHITECTURE IS A MARRIAGE OF CONTEMPORARY AND TRADITIONAL STYLES WITH SUBTLE DESIGN ELEMENTS OFFERING HOMAGE TO THE MID-CENTURY MODERN THEME PRESENT AMONG MANY OF WHEAT RIDGE'S OLDER NEIGHBORHOODS. THERE WILL BE TWO ENTRY POINTS INTO THE DEVELOPMENT FROM UPHAM STREET WITH STREETSCAPE AND SIGN MONUMENTS TO PROVIDE A SENSE OF ENTRY FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD. EACH OWNER WILL ENJOY BOTH PRIVACY OFFERED BY PRIVATE, LOW—FENCED YARDS WITH MINIMALIST LANDSCAPING, AS WELL AS EASY ACCESS TO THE MAIN FOCAL POINT OF THE DEVELOPMENT, A CENTRAL POCKET PARK. THIS GATHERING SPACE OFFERS A GENEROUS SOD LAWN BORDERED BY PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS, PARK BENCHES, AND SHADE TREES, WHERE RESIDENTS MAY ENTERTAIN, PLAY, AND RELAX. o 1000 2000 1" 1000' PREPARED BY BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING 3253 NORTH GAYLORD STREET DENVER, CO 80205 CONTACT: JESSE DONOVAN, PE 720-504-8629 jesse@brightlightereng.com PREPARED FOR UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC 4251 KIPLING STREET, SUITE 310 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 CONTACT: NEIL SHEA 303-870-0533 SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE 1 COVER SHEET 2 SITE PLAN 3 UTILITY PLAN 4 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 5 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 6 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 7 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 8 ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 9 ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES 10 ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES 11 ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES 12 LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANT LIST 13 LANDSCAPE PLAN 14 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 15 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 16 LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS CASE HISTORY V\/Z- 18-17 V\/Z-1 8-18 WS -18-02 OWNER/APPLICANT UPHAM PARTNERS, LLC 4251 KIPLING STREET, SUITE 310 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80033 CONTACT: NEIL SHEA 303-870-0533 neilQvisionocquisitions.com N CIVIL ENGINEER BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING LLC 3253 NORTH GAYLORD STREET DENVER, CO 80205 CONTACT: JESSE DONOVAN, PE 720-540-8629 jesse@brightlightereng.com ARCHITECT HANGAR 41, LLC 825 SANTA FE DRIVE DENVER, CO 80204 CONTACT: MATT JOINER 303-954-0933 mjoiner@hongor-4l.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OUTDOOR DESIGN GROUP, INC. 590 WEBSTER STREET ARVADA, CO 80002 CONTACT: MATT CORRION, PLA 303-993-4811 mcorrion@odgdesign.com SURVEYOR ENGINEERING SERVICE COMPANY 14190 EAST EVANS AVENUE AURORA, CO 80014 CONTACT: BRETT MILLER, PLS 303-337-1393 x101 bmiller@engineeringserviceco.com GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER A.G. WASSENAAR, INC 2180 SOUTH IVANHOE STREET, SUITE 5 DENVER, CO 80222 CONTACT: KEITH SEATON, PE 303-759-8100 www.agwassenaar.com SITE DATA TABLE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LIGHTING DESIGN C3S ENGINEERING, INC. 1737 CENTRAL STREET, SUITE 201 DENVER, CO 80211 CONTACT: THERESA SANTOS 303-480-5144 thereso@c3sengineeringinc.com ZONING PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) LAND USE TOWNHOMES TOTAL AREA [ACRES/SQ.FT.] GROSS [ACRES/SQ.FT.] NET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 1.90 ACRES 1.84 ACRES LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED PROVIDED MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 80,029 100 MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK 15' 15' MINIMUM SIDE SETBACK 10' 10' MINIMUM REAR SETBACK 5' 5' MAXIMUM DENSITY 21 UNITS/ACRE 38 UNITS PROPOSED MINIMUM OPEN SPACE 30% 34% PARKING REQUIRED PER 1, 2, OR 3 BEDROOM RESIDENCE 2 SPACES 76 SPACES PROPOSED VISITOR PARKING SPACES 0.24 PER UNIT 9 SPACES (17 SPACES INCLUDING ADJACENT STREET PARKING) BICYCLE PARKING 0.1 PER UNIT 4 BICYCLE SPACES LOT COVERAGE *SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE EAST % OF THE NORTHWEST X OF THE SOUTHWEST '/a OF THE SOUTHEAST '/a OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST %; THENCE S00° 14'04"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST % A DISTANCE OF 132.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOO* 14'04"E ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 264.61 FEET; THENCE N89039'47"E A DISTANCE OF 328.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST THENCE NOU 13'09"W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET; THENCE N89039'47"W A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00° 13'09"W ALONG A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 209.63 FEET; THENCE N89039'59"E ALONG A LINE THAT IS 132.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST % A DISTANCE OF 308.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS (82,849 SQUARE FEET) 1.9020 ACRES. PROJECT NUMBER SQ. FT. PERCENT (%) NET LOT AREA 80,029 100 BUILDING COVERAGE 26,428 33 LANDSCAPE/OPEN SPACE* 28,083 34 HARD SURFACE 25,518 33 *SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE EAST % OF THE NORTHWEST X OF THE SOUTHWEST '/a OF THE SOUTHEAST '/a OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID EAST %; THENCE S00° 14'04"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST % A DISTANCE OF 132.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING SOO* 14'04"E ALONG SAID EAST LINE A DISTANCE OF 264.61 FEET; THENCE N89039'47"E A DISTANCE OF 328.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST THENCE NOU 13'09"W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET; THENCE N89039'47"W A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00° 13'09"W ALONG A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 209.63 FEET; THENCE N89039'59"E ALONG A LINE THAT IS 132.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST % A DISTANCE OF 308.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS (82,849 SQUARE FEET) 1.9020 ACRES. PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER CWK REVIEWER PSD o 0 BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING z 00 00 00 Q w o 0 J Wco N 0 (y) 00 O z Q O c O O Lu j Q c O 04 J = O N 0 > Z) U o O J � �w� O CD w Lu O � o z Q Lu ~ W N Q O U N = z o — LL Q o C) � 0 w U U) Lu o w U U) V) 1 OF 16 00 00 00 W o 0 0 0 Q O O M 04 04 0 0000 0 O) 0 N o 0 U V) w o Q z - m m - CD m m V) cf) > cf) U) U) > a a a a W p 0 0 p cl� cf) U) U) cn z 0 N M zElf O W —m O N M =>:o 0 0 0 w =D D- z COVER SHEET 1 OF 16 EXISTING I EDGE OF ASPHALT PROPERLY LINE (TYP.) RANGE LINE-/ I 26.5 (� OF RAW) 25' X 15'— SIGHT 5' -SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE (TYP.) D STOP SIGN - NORTHERN VEHICULAR ENTRANCE PROJECT - IDENTIFICATION SIGN ON 3' FENCE CORNERS (NP.) PROPOSEDSTOP SIGN PROPOSED 2' PAN, 6" VERTICAL CURB, AND 5' ATTACHED WALK 25' X 15' J SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE (TYP.) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LEGEND EXISTING _ FFLOWLINE T/1 DC\IAIAI a a a a A BUILDING 6 BUILDING 2 14 SIX UNITS 123.0'x34' FOUR UNITS o 0 83.0' x 34' I w00 o rRivmL i r LivV< < If r. iv, L, Nrvu 3 rL 3) TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PROPERTY LINE ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY 3960 UPHAM STREET X �— x — — r— X 3oz.asa PROPERLY LINE (NP.) 20' SETBACK (REAR 75% OF SITE) 0 20 40 V 1 ° = 20' 22 23 24 25 CA 4 26 O 27 A BUILDING 6 DESIGNER 14 SIX UNITS 123.0'x34' JSD o YARD FENCE (TYP.) ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY a UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER 14 REVIEWER JSD o 0 J w00 �co N 07 (yy) O z Q 2O O Lu QO -r 00 O G INVI'vilvirl VIM 26.0' GARAGE FACE TO GARAGE FACE 24.0' CLEAR FIRE LANE 4% PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY LOT LINE EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED SETBACK PROPOSED FLOW LINE PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB PROPOSED LIP LINE EXISTING FLOW LINE EXISTING TOP BACK OF CURB EXISTING LIP LINE PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVING PROP. DECORATIVE CONCRETE PAVING PROPOSED STRIPING PROPOSED ADA PARKING STRIPING PROPOSED SIGNAGE PROPOSED UNIT NUMBER PROPOSED GARAGE PARKING SPACE FACE OF BUILDING GARAGE DOOR (TYP.) �4% I CONCRETE PAVEMENT .qPr.TinKl ,o -A 0 5 10 1' = 5' R.0 W. LINE (WEST SIDE) PROPERTY LINE OF R.O.W (RIDGETOP VILLAGE) AFTER DEDICATION 10.0' I 26.5' 11.0 6' I ' I . 0 5.0 DRIVE PARKING SIDEWALK Vnrrr n' ACDWAi T LANE �' r%0F 1 lP%L I FrW LIVIL1 1 1 UPHAM STREET SECTION 0 5 10 6" VERTICAL CURB PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER CWK REVIEWER JSD o 0 BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING z 00 00 00 rn Q Lu o 0 J w00 �co N 07 (yy) O z Q 2O O Lu QO -r 00 O G O O ti _ > Z) U .� O J (D- O W (D Lu W >ON�a o z Lu 0 ~ W< � � O U CD N=O z — Q o 0 Lu U �/ o U) W o Lu U U) C/") 2 00 00 00 rn W o 0 0 0 Q O O M N N O 00 0 O) 0 N o z 0 U C/") w o Q z - m m - CD m m C/-) > cf) U) U) w o 0 0 0 cl� cf) co co z Q c~n N M zElf O W -m O N M > =>:o 0 0 0 w =D � z SITE PLAN OF 16 T WATER MAIN EXTENSION TEE W = 0 En U) Ln 6" WATER CROSSING 0 QI i wl Qi �I a� �- Q P En EXISTING 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER will 6" WATER CROSSING I ' I o I � MAIN EXTENSION TEE ' EXISTING SANITARY E SEWER MANHOLE RIM=5425.91 _ INV. OUT(N)=5416.36 = I INV. IN(S)=5416.41 iu� PROPOSED SERVICE LINE 0 I WITH CORP STOP, CURB STOP, AND METER (TYP.). cn w � MH -A3 4'0 SAN MIT' cn RIM=5425.21 INV IN (8'E) =5417.82 I INV IN (8'S) =5417.82 ' INV OUT (8'N) -5417.62 PP I MH -A3-1 HE- , 4'0 SAN MIT I RIM -5425.83 INV OUT (8"N) =5419.71 i 0 RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO U MH I U) MH -A? 4'0 SAN MH 4'0 SAN MH SERVICE LINE RIM RIM -5425.72 = WITH CORP STOP, CURB STOP, INV IN (8"N) =5416.79 1.5" WATER CROSSING AND METER INV IN (81) =5416.79 U V wINLET INV IN (8"S) -5416.79 o TYPE R INLET INV OUT (8°W) =5416.59 O v 2 -5424.31 Q o co INV 1.5" WATER CROSSING ? P INV cnI Q > � N 12" WATER AND GAS CROSSING EX. STORM MANHOLE w ,I INLET = I W 6" WATER CROSSING ABANDONED Z 1 ~o MH -A1 TYPE R INLET 4'0 SAN MIT w 'qtQ RIM -5426.35 W ' U INV IN (81) -5416.02 INV Q INV IN (8°S) =5415.82 LL 0 INV OUT (8"N) =5415.80 4'0 SAN MH T WATER MAIN EXTENSION TEE W = 0 En U) Ln 6" WATER CROSSING 0 QI i wl Qi �I a� �- Q P En EXISTING 8" PVC SANITARY SEWER will 6" WATER CROSSING I ' I o I � MAIN EXTENSION TEE ' EXISTING SANITARY E SEWER MANHOLE RIM=5425.91 _ INV. OUT(N)=5416.36 = I INV. IN(S)=5416.41 iu� PROPOSED SERVICE LINE 0 I WITH CORP STOP, CURB STOP, AND METER (TYP.). cn w � MH -A3 4'0 SAN MIT' cn RIM=5425.21 INV IN (8'E) =5417.82 I INV IN (8'S) =5417.82 ' INV OUT (8'N) -5417.62 PP I MH -A3-1 HE- , 4'0 SAN MIT I RIM -5425.83 INV OUT (8"N) =5419.71 i 0 RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO U MH -A1-1 CROSSING. LOWER - X - - WATER PIPE UNDER 8" PVC STORM PIPE AT 2.0% 4'0 SAN MH PROPOSED SERVICE LINE RIM -5426.74 WITH CORP STOP, CURB STOP, W 1.5" WATER CROSSING AND METER (TYP.). 6 YARD DRAIN ( ) 11.0' Ill a o a To' � SED2 ARY EASEMENT z M v Lo PVC @ 0.60% 0 6" WATER MAIN EXTENSION ,o �R10.0 12 13 `n 1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (TYPJ 1a � II 30.0' P OPOSEI DENVER! WATER 22.0' 15 PROPOSED SANITARY EASEMENT VAN R10. 0' nccessie - J v 'cNn- � 6" WATER MAIN EXTENSION `! r, 1.5" WATER CROSSING / 6" PVC STORM PIPE AT 2.0% N 6" YARD DRAIN (TYP.) x_ x- x X 8" PVC STORM PIPE AT 2.0% EX. OVERHEAD E _ WELECTRIC TO , BE REMOVED i � I f ❑ ❑ ❑ ,0 11 J� w / EXISTING DETENTION POND TO BE o 4'0 SAN MH MODIFIED/ENLARGED RIM -5424.45 PROP. NV OUT (8"W) =5419.11 DRAINAGE ESMT EX. ABANDONED h 8" PVC @ 1.00% � TELECOM TO 230.4' - 8" PVC @ 0.60% PR. DRAINAGE ESMT I v M M moLno z] zoo 31 33 37 22.0' 11. ' 1.0' . PROPOSED SANITARY EASEMENT 1.5" WATER 6" YARD DRAIN (TYP.) -oHE- _ caH - - X X oHE- - En CROSSING. LOWER - X - - WATER PIPE UNDER 8" PVC STORM PIPE AT 2.0% -oHE---- .� CWK SANITARY BE REMOVED 0 TO REMAIN CA O z w W EX. STORM PVC PIPE 2.0 60 V wINLET M4 o TYPE R INLET = O v 2 -5424.31 Q o co INV IN (8"S) =5420.95 ? P INV OUT (24"NE) -5420.95 > w N EX. STORM MANHOLE w 0 INLET 1.0 X09 W 019t0 ABANDONED Z W ~o 10' TYPE R INLET w 'qtQ BE REMOVED O Z U ,^ INV IN (8"N) =5422.08 0 LL 0 0 4'0 SAN MH NV OUT (18"SE) -5422.0 RIM -5423.77 17 18 19 20 21 u, w � I W w o D J a Q Q W = F F m m - - - m Iw m 18" F.E.S. U) U) U) U) w a a a a p p U) U) W PROPOSED � _ � o FENCE N M V z� CD w O N Mm M :-o 0 0 23 24 25 26 27 Q Z UTILITY PLAN 24" F.E.S. rx PROP. DRAINAGE ESMT 230.4' - 8" PVC @ 0.60% PR. DRAINAGE ESMT I v M M moLno z] zoo 31 33 37 22.0' 11. ' 1.0' . PROPOSED SANITARY EASEMENT 1.5" WATER 6" YARD DRAIN (TYP.) -oHE- _ caH - - X X oHE- - X - 1.5" WATER CROSSING - X - - CROSSING. LOWER - X - - WATER PIPE UNDER 8" PVC STORM PIPE AT 2.0% -oHE---- .� CWK SANITARY 6" PVC STORM PIPE AT 2.0% 0 20 40 1 „ 20' a Gk El ss NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY LOT LINE EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED FLOW LINE PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB LIP LINE, AND CONCRETE EXISTING FLOW LINE EXISTING TOP BACK OF CURB EXISTING LIP LINE =0196,1Ali IkuOlt' PROPOSED ADA PARKING STRIPING PROPOSED SIGNAGE PROPOSED UNIT COUNT PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED/EXISTING STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED/EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE PROPOSED/EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE PIPE CROSSING REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER HYDRANT WATER METER PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 / EX. FENCE CWK REVIEWER / 0 TO REMAIN W w W EX. STORM PVC PIPE 2.0 N V wINLET M4 15' TYPE R INLET = O v RIM -5424.31 Q o co INV IN (8"S) =5420.95 ? O INV OUT (24"NE) -5420.95 > w N EX. STORM MANHOLE w 0 EX z W 019t0 ABANDONED Z W ~o TELECOM TO w 'qtQ BE REMOVED O Z U ,^ W MIT A4 0 LL 0 0 4'0 SAN MH RIM -5423.77 o w U) NV OUT (8"W) =5419.20 p w � I W o D J a Q Q W = F F Gk El ss NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LEGEND PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY LOT LINE EXISTING EASEMENT PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED SETBACK LINE PROPOSED FLOW LINE PROPOSED TOP BACK OF CURB LIP LINE, AND CONCRETE EXISTING FLOW LINE EXISTING TOP BACK OF CURB EXISTING LIP LINE =0196,1Ali IkuOlt' PROPOSED ADA PARKING STRIPING PROPOSED SIGNAGE PROPOSED UNIT COUNT PROPOSED STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PROPOSED/EXISTING STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED/EXISTING STORM STRUCTURE PROPOSED/EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE PIPE CROSSING REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTER HYDRANT WATER METER PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER CWK REVIEWER JSD 0 0 BRIGHTLIGHTER ENGINEERING z co co co rn JW W 0 0 W w W N � N V N M4 co Q O v O W Q o co 6 N ? O N C a > O N O w 0 o z W 019t0 Z W ~o w 'qtQ O Z U ,^ W 2 0 LL 0 0 UE o w U) LLI p W w 3 OF 16_ co co co rn W 0 0 0 0 N N N N Q O v O ch 0 N N O co O N O O 0 z O w D J a Q Q Q F F F m m CD m m U) U) U) U) w a a a a p p U) U) zz � U) � N M V z� CD w O N Mm M :-o 0 0 0 W Q Z UTILITY PLAN 3 OF 16_ ^ABLE & SHED rx SPHALT SHINGL ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 & 7, SIDE 'B' (SOUTH) SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" LLLVf IIVIV-u SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" MATERIAL COVERAGES (PER ELEVATION) BRICK❑ 30% MIN. COVERAGE. 08/20/2018 *INCLUDES BELT COURSING AT BOTH SILL AND HEAD HT. LAP SIDING❑ 60% MAX. COVERAGE. AP *INCLUDES 2 COLORS 112 SIZE/ORIENTATION VARIATIONS PER ELEV. MIN. OPENINGS❑ 35-40% ON ENTRY AND GARAGE FACADES (DOMINANT BUILDING LENGTHS) i( 15% MIN. ON BUILDING SIDES (MAJORITY OF LEVEL 1 IS GARAGE WALL) PAINTED SOFFI- LAP SIDING (1-1) VINYL WINDOW, BANDING & TRIN LAP SIDING (1-3) BRICK BASE (B' SILL & HEADER COURSES, ALL GABLE & SHED rx ASPHALT SHINGL SIDE 'A' (NORTH) FRONT (UPHAM) SIDE 'B' (SOUTH) PAINTED SOFFIT LAP SIDING (1-2) VINYL WINDOW, BANDING & TRIM LAP SIDING (1-3) DETACHED BALD & RAILING BRICK BASE (B' SILL & HEADER COURSES, ALL ELEVATION - BUILDING 1 & 7, REAR SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" REAR jr LAP SIDING (1-2) SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" I BALCONY ABOVE I I EDGE OF PATIO I .AP SIDING (1-1) ZECESSED :NTRY BAY 8________ 9___ PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP 0 N 0 N 4 OF 16 m LLl 0 N 0 N J i( O N 1000 �V /rw�T1 (A M c l� < Q 0 O O l) W J Q O �N Z° Q J O r- � ? 0 o (o w w J W ^o LL Tn i� e mo� c p Z 4 OF 16 m LLl 0 N 0 N J 0 N LLI N 1000 �V /rw�T1 (A M c z a 0 O O l) W J Q O �N o � J O r- � ? 0 o (o w w J W ^o LL i� d c p Z W O cNo > 0 w OT w O U (D o w 0 � U c oU) J w W J Q o w 4 OF 16 m w < 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N < p N p M 0 0 O m o a 0 0 ElE Elf LnLn w 0 J J Q J Q J Q CD m m m m a a a a w K 0 z N M z� O W m O N M O O O O w� ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 4 OF 16 ^ABLE & SHED rx SPHALT SHINGL IL ELEVATION - BUILDINGS 2 & 8, SIDE'B' SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" PAINTED SOFFI- LAP SIDING (1-2) VINYL WINDOW, BANDING & TRIN LAP SIDING (1-3) BRICK BASE (B' SILL & HEADER COURSES, ALL SABLE & SHED rx SPHALT SHINGL SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" SIDE 'A' REAR FRONT PAINTED SOFFI- LAP SIDING (1-2) VINYL WINDOW, BANDING & TRIN LAP SIDING (1-3) DETACHED BALI & RAILING BRICK BASE (B' SILL & HEADER COURSES, ALL MATERIAL COVERAGES (PER ELEVATION) BRICK❑ 30% MIN. COVERAGE. 08/20/2018 *INCLUDES BELT COURSING AT BOTH SILL AND HEAD HT. LAP SIDING❑ 60% MAX. COVERAGE. AP *INCLUDES 2 COLORS 112 SIZE/ORIENTATION VARIATIONS PER ELEV. MIN. OPENINGS❑ 35-40% ON ENTRY AND GARAGE FACADES (DOMINANT BUILDING LENGTHS) i( 15% MIN. ON BUILDING SIDES (MAJORITY OF LEVEL 1 IS GARAGE WALL) ELEVATION - BUILDINGS 2 & 8, REAR SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" i IIz -----� -AwI II ==allll II �/ N SIDE 'B' �-.. 8___-____9 RECESSED BAY, L2-L3 LAP SIDING (1-2) LAP SIDING (1-3) LAP SIDING (1-1) LAP SIDING (L1)RECESSED ENTRY LAP SIDING (1-2) I BALCONY ABOVE I I EDGE OF PATIO I PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP fr 0 N 5 m F- LU fr 0 N J i( O N p /r LIT�1 V (A M 00 00 l� < Q 2 O L0 W 0 J Q O 00N Z° Q J O C ow ElE w J W ^ LL Tn (9 e mo� c p Zcq 5 m F- LU 0 N 0 N J w L N p /r LIT�1 V (A M 00 00 Z Q 2 O L0 W 0 J Q O 00N o J O C ow ElE w J W ^ LL o (9 d c p Zcq W O c > 0 w OT w O U 0 w 0 0 � U c o J w U) W J Q o w 5 m w < 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N < p N p M O 0 O m o a 0 0 ElE Elf LnLn w 0 J J Q J Q J Q CD m m m m a a a a w K 0 z N M O W m O N M O O O O w � w z ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS OF 16 0 GABLE & SHED mnnc7 ASPHALT SHINGL 0 ❑ ❑ PAINTED SOFFIT ELEVATION - BUILDINGS 3 & 9, SIDE'B' SCALE: 1/8"= 1"- 0" LAP SIDING (1-5) VINYL WINDOW, BANDING & TRIM LAP SIDING (1-3) BRICK BASE (Be SILL & HEADER COURSES, ALL ___.. _.. Z.. 3 _.._ j:6 1 REAR I SIDE'A' SIDE'B' FRONT oE:nE:ccE:n DA\/ i ELEVATION - BUILDINGS 3 & 9, REAR SCALE: 1/8" = 1 " - 0" SABLE & SHED ROOF, SPHALT SHINGLE, (R2) SCALE: 1/8"= 1"- 0" PAINTED SOFFITS WINDOWVINYL BANDING _ .�� • Imo■ ■ ■ ■■ ■ ■■ ■■ ■ SILL& HEADER BELT ■■ ■■ ■■ �� COURSES, ■ ■ I■ ■I - - ■I ■ ■ ...■I ■ ■ LLL Vf I IVIV - U SCALE: 1/8" = 1 " - 0" BALCONYABOVE NI ISI I K AV-- v li I1 v-- V II iE v-- v I EDGE OF PATIO I MATERIAL COVERAGES (PER ELEVATION) BRICK❑ 30% MIN. COVERAGE. 08/20/2018 *INCLUDES BELT COURSING AT BOTH SILL AND HEAD HT. LAP SIDING❑ 60% MAX. COVERAGE. AP *INCLUDES 2 COLORS ❑ 2 SIZE/ORIENTATION VARIATIONS PER ELEV. MIN. OPENINGS❑ 35-40% ON ENTRY AND GARAGE FACADES (DOMINANT BUILDING LENGTHS) i( 15% MIN. ON BUILDING SIDES (MAJORITY OF LEVEL 1 IS GARAGE WALL) LAP SIDING (1-5) LAP SIDING (1-3) LAP SIDING (1-4) LAP SIDING (1-4)RECESSED ENTRY LAP SIDING (1-5) PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP fr N 6 OF 16 m w0000 < fr N JLLI i( O N 04 p /rwLIT�1 V F- M 00 �s a 2 O L0 W J Q O 00N Z° Q J O C Ow J � o w C9 a W Tn p e W mo� ccl > 6 OF 16 m w0000 < N N JLLI N LU N 04 p /rwLIT�1 V F- M 00 Z Q 2 O L0 W J Q O 00N o J O C Ow J � o w C9 a W c p z W O ccl > 0 w OT U w O o 0 0 � U c oU) w W o J w J Q J Q 6 OF 16 m w0000 < N N N N < p N p M O NT O o a 0 0 E ElfLnLn w 0 J J Q J Q J Q CD m m m m 7 a a a a w r �2 z N M O W m ON M O O O O w � w z ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 6 OF 16 SABLE & SHED rx SPHALT SHINGL ELEVATION - BUILDING 4, SIDE '13' (SOUTH) SCALE: 1/8"= 1"- 0" imimimi IBJ LLL Vf I IVIV - u SCALE: 1/8"= 1"- 0" PAINTED SOFFI- LAP SIDING (1-5) VINYL WINDOW, BANDING & TRIN LAP SIDING (1-3) BRICK BASE (B,9 SILL & HEADER COURSES, ALL FRONT (UPHAM) SIDE (SOUTH) ELEVATION - BUILDING 4, REAR SCALE: 1/8"= 1"- 0" GABLE & SHED ROOF, ASPHALT SHINGLE, (R2) PAINTED SOFFITS LAP SIDING (L5) VINYL WINDOW, TYP. - BANDING & TRIM, PTD. LAP SIDING (1-3) DETACHED BALCONY- & RAILING BRICK BASE (132); SILL & HEADER BELT - COURSES, ALL SIDES MATERIAL COVERAGES (PER ELEVATION) BRICK❑ 30% MIN. COVERAGE. 08/20/2018 *INCLUDES BELT COURSING AT BOTH SILL AND HEAD HT. LAP SIDING❑ 60% MAX. COVERAGE. AP *INCLUDES 2 COLORS 112 SIZE/ORIENTATION VARIATIONS PER ELEV. MIN. OPENINGS❑ 35-40% ON ENTRY AND GARAGE FACADES (DOMINANT BUILDING LENGTHS) 0 N 15% MIN. ON BUILDING SIDES (MAJORITY OF LEVEL 1 IS GARAGE WALL) EDGE OF PATIO EDGE OF PATIO LLL Vf I IVIV - u SCALE: 1/8"= 1"- 0" y REAR 10 ��_.. 8_-_-..__-9 9— LAP SIDING (1-5) LAP SIDING (1-3) LAP SIDING (1-4) LAP SIDING (1-4)RECESSED ENTRY O • -SIDING (1-5) ■t■ EM mmi_■ 7m■ PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP fr 0 N 7 OF 16 m w < fr 0 N Jw 0 N O \V; p /rLuT�1 V (A M 00 00 Z a NT O O l) W J Q O �N Z° Q J 0 r— OW J ^ LL o w (9 d W Tn p e W mo� cli (D > 7 OF 16 m w < 0 N 0 N Jw 0 N LU N p /rLuT�1 V (A M 00 00 Z a NT O O l) W J Q O �N o J 0 r— OW J ^ LL o w (9 d W c p z W O cli (D > 0 w OT U w O o ILw 0 0 U c o0 W o J w J Q J Q 7 OF 16 m w < 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N < p N p M O NT O o a 0 0 E ElfLnLn w 0 J J Q J Q J Q CD m m m m a a a a w r �2 z N M z� O W m O N M O O O O W � W Z ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 7 OF 16 ^ABLE & SHED ROCS SPHALT SHINGLE I ELEVATION - BUILDINGS 5 & 6, SIDE 'B' SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" PAINTED SOFFITS LAP SIDING (L2)— VINYL WINDOW, T` BANDING & TRIM, F LAP SIDING (1-3) BRICK BASE (131); SILL & HEADER BE COURSES, ALL SIC SABLE & SHED rx SPHALT SHINGL SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" PAINTED SOFFIT LAP SIDING (1-2) VINYL WINDOW, BANDING & TRIN LAP SIDING (1-3) DETACHED BALI & RAILING BRICK BASE (B' SILL & HEADER COURSES, ALL MATERIAL COVERAGES (PER ELEVATION) BRICK❑ 30% MIN. COVERAGE. 08/20/2018 *INCLUDES BELT COURSING AT BOTH SILL AND HEAD HT. LAP SIDING❑ 60% MAX. COVERAGE. AP *INCLUDES 2 COLORS 112 SIZE/ORIENTATION VARIATIONS PER ELEV. MIN. OPENINGS❑ 35-40% ON ENTRY AND GARAGE FACADES (DOMINANT BUILDING LENGTHS) i( 15% MIN. ON BUILDING SIDES (MAJORITY OF LEVEL 1 IS GARAGE WALL) _.. _.. _.. Z.. _.. _.. _.._ 3 _.._ 1 REAR 5 SIDE 'A' SIDE 'B' 10 6 i FRONT I I 7 SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" RECESSED BAY, L2-L3 _AP SIDING L2) LAP SIDING (L3) LAP SIDING (L1) ' "^ `''DING CESSED ' BAYS SCALE: 1/8" = 1" - 0" iii II Nl�lh I �l = IDING IBALCONY ABOVE I I EDGE OF PATIO I PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP fr 0 N 8 0F 16 u+, m w < fr 0 N JLLI i( O N 04 p /Lu " F- M 00 l� < Q 2 O L0 W J Q O 00N Z° Q J O C Ow J � o w C9 a W Tn p e W mo� cli (D > 8 0F 16 m w < 0 N 0 N JLLI 0 N LU N 04 p /Lu " F- M 00 Z Q 2 O L0 W J Q O 00N o J O C Ow J � o w C9 a W c p z W O cli (D > 0 w OT U w O 0 0 0 � U c oU) w W o J w J Q J Q 8 0F 16 m w < 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N < p N p M O 0 O m o a 0 0 ElE Elf LnLn w 0 J J Q J Q J Q CD m m m m a a a a w K 0 z N M O W m O N M W � � z ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS 8 0F 16 JJ l_= J1 = ® lob 71 71 - man 0 PERSPECTIVE - VIEW EAST FROM UPHAM NTS T, AAA �I IIII'� II � i I I - I _� t - -__. __Tc _-��_1J_ I� ® I J �I PERSPECTIVE -VIEW N.E. FROM UPHAM NTS PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP s N s N 9 OF 16 u-, m QWcr) w < s N s N s N ILL, O \V; O /rL,T�1 V (A M 00 c ZQ 2 oo Lo W J Q 0 Zc J a O C d i > U 0 m w Jw W Tn C9 e mo c p z 9 OF 16 m QWcr) w < s N s N s N ILL, L Q � O /rL,T�1 V (A M 00 c ZQ 2 oo Lo W J Q 0 o J a O C d i > U 0 m w Jw W o C9 a c p z W O cli (D > p LU OTwO U (D 0 w 0 � U V oU) J W W d J Q oo c w � U) 9 OF 16 m w < s N s N s N s N Q � O N O M O 0 O m o a s 0 E El ElfLnLn w 0 J J Q J Q J Q m m m CDLn m a a a a w K 0 z r N M O W m O N M w� ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES 9 OF 16 i II .f I � I 11 PERSPECTIVE - VIEW EAST FROM THE CENTRAL PARK NTS WP' 11 PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP N N 10 OF 16 2 �2 u-, WN N N J N O \V; p /r��T1 V (A M c Z Q 2 O r) Lr) W J Q O O Zc J O N C i ? 0 ElE W W Tn CW9 e mo� c p z 10 OF 16 2 �2 �2m WN N N J N co p /r��T1 V (A M c Z Q 2 O r) Lr) W J Q O O o J O N C i ? 0 ElE W W o CW9 a c p z WO Ln cliF- (D > p Lu OTwO Ln U (D o w 0 U c oU) J W W J Q o c W 10 OF 16 2 �2 �2m w0000 < N N N N < p N O M O 0 O m o a s `o ElE Elf Ln Ln w 0 J J Q J Q J Q CD m m m m a a a a w K 0 z N M Z W O W m O N M O O O O W � W Z ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES 10 OF 16 1 L1 0 000 ®® PERSPECTIVE - VIEW NORTHWEST ACROSS THE CENTRAL PARK NTS 911 � � I ffE- U PROJECT NUMBER UP1801 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER MC J REVIEWER AP 0 N 0 N u-, m w <c 0 N 0 N JLU 0 N O \V; p /rIL,T�1 V U) M c Z Q 2 O lrr)i W J Q O O Zc J O N C OW w J W ^ LL Tn e mo� c p z m w <c 0 N 0 N JLU 0 N LU N 04 p /rIL,T�1 V U) M c Z Q 2 O lrr)i W J Q O O o J O N C OW w J W ^ LL o d c p z WO LnLn cliF- (D > p Lu OTwO U (D ci o w 0 U c oU) J w W d J Q o c w � U m w <c 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 N <c p N O M O 0 O m o a 0 `o Elfw LnLn w 0 J J Q J Q J Q CD m m m m a a a a w K 0 z N M Z W O W m ON M O O O O W � W Z ARCHITECTURAL PERSPECTIVES RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECFC DEVELOPMENT PLAN �N WHEAT RUGE, COLORADO APART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES (00 OQO DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES Blue Chip Juniper Juniperus horizonta lis 'Blue Chip' 8-12" 6-8' Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 6 SRJ Skyrocket Juniper MATURE MATURE WATER Low SIZE AND 5 Gallon Cont SYMBOL COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Pinus mugo 'Mops' 2-3' 2-3' SUN/SHADE Sun / Part Shade QTY 16 DBE Dwarf Blue Eastern White Pine HEIGHT SPREAD USE Medium CONDITION 5 Gallon Cont AGG Autumn Gold Ginkgo Ginkgo biloba'Autumn Gold' 25-50' 25-35' Medium Sun 2" Cal., B&B 2 SKC Seedless Kentucky Coffeetree Gymnocladus dio icus 'Espresso' 50-60' 40-50' Low Sun 2" Cal., B&B 2 SSL Sterling Silver Linden Tilia 1omentosa 'Sterling Silver' 40-50' 20-35' Medium Sun 2" Cal., B&B 3 ACE Accolade Elm UImus Accolade 50-70' 30-40' Medium Sun 2" Cal., B&B 2 ORNAMENTAL TREES HEIGHT SPREAD USE 0 CONDITION BBG Big Bluestem Grass MATURE MATURE WATER Low SIZE AND 5 Gallon Cont SYMBOL COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Avalanche' 34 18-24" SUN/SHADE Sun / Part Shade QTY 16 FRG Feather Reed Grass HEIGHT SPREAD USE Low CONDITION 5 Gallon Cont CSM Crimson Sunsets Maple Acer x Crimson Sunset 30-35' 20-25' Medium Sun 2" Cal., B&B 7 FFH Frans Fontaine Hornbeam Carpinus betulus'Frans Fontaine' 20-30' 10-15' Medium Sun / Part Shade 2" Cal., B&B 8 EAR Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis 20-30' 20-30' Medium Adaptable 2" Cal., B&B 2 TOP Tower Poplar Populus x canescens'Tower' 30-40' 8-10' Medium Sun 1-1/2" Cal., B&B 4 ABP Autumn Blaze Pear Pyrus calleryana'Auturnn Blaze' 25-35' 20-30' Medium Sun 2" Cal., B&B 4 SCP Summer Charm Peking Lilac Syringa pekinensis Summer Charm 15-20' 10-15' Low Sun 2" Cal., B&B 2 EVERGREEN TREES Plume Grass Saccharum ravennae 8-12' 34 Medium Sun 5 Gallon Cont 6 PERENNIALS MATURE MATURE WATER SIZE AND SYMBOL COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MATURE MATURE WATER SUN/SHADE SIZE AND QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME HEIGHT SPREAD USE SUN/SHADE CONDITION QTY FNS Fastigate Norway Spruce Picea abies'Cupressina' 15-20' 4-6' Medium Sun 6' ht, B&B 3 CBS Colorado Blue Spruce Picea pungens 40-60' 20-30' Medium Sun / Part Shade 6' ht, B&B 1 CGB Compact Gem Bosnina Pine Pinus Ieucodermis'Compact Gerd 10-15' 5-8' Low Sun / Part Shade 6' ht, B&B 2 DECIDUOUS SHRUBS White Bleeding Heart Dicentra spectabilis'Alba' 24 18-24" Medium Shade 4" Pot/ 24" O.C. 15 OGD Orange Daylily MATURE MATURE WATER Low SIZE AND 4" Pot/ 24" O.C. SYMBOL COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME Kniphota uvaria 34 24 SUN/SHADE Sun QTYHEIGHT 20 PGF Purple Gayfeather Liatris spicata'Floristan Violet SPREAD USE Low CONDITION 4" Pot/ 36" O.C. RES Regent Seryice berry Amelanchier alnilolia 'Regent 64 6-8' Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 6 SOS Standing Ovation Serviceberry Amelanchier alntiia Standing Ovation 12-15' 34 Medium Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 6 RCB Red Columnar Barberry Berberis thunbergii'Helmond Pillar' 4-5' 18-24" Low Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cant 34 BYD Bud's Yellow Dogwood Cornus alba 'Bud's Yellow' 64 5-6' Medium Adaptable 5 Gallon Cont 12 ISB Isanti Dogwood Cornus stolonitbra 'Isanti' 4-5' 4-6' Medium Adaptable 5 Gallon Cont 6 BRB Burkwoodii Red Broom Cytisus scoparius'Burkwoodii' 2-3' 34 Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 6 RUS Russian Sage Perovskia atriplicifolia 34 34 Very Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 13 MTP Mango Tango Potentilla Potentilla fruticosa Mango Tango 18-24 18-24 Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 19 BLV Blackhaw Viburnum Viburnum pruntlium 12-15' 10-15' Medium Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 1 MM Midnight Wine Weigela Weigela forida MidnightWine 18-24" 18-24" Medium Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 29 EVERGREEN SHRUBS MATURE MATURE WATER SIZE AND SYMBOL COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SUN/SHADE QTY HEIGHT SPREAD USE CONDITION BCJ Blue Chip Juniper Juniperus horizonta lis 'Blue Chip' 8-12" 6-8' Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 6 SRJ Skyrocket Juniper Juniperus scopulorum'Skyrockef 15-20' 2-3' Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 6 MMP Miniature Muga Pine Pinus mugo 'Mops' 2-3' 2-3' Low Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 16 DBE Dwarf Blue Eastern White Pine Pinus strobus'Blue Shag' 34 34 Medium Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 3 BEY Bright Edge Yucca Yucca filamento sa 'Bright Edge' 24 24 Low Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 6 ORNAMENTAL GRASSES W< Q � U 0 N z 0 LL MATURE MATURE WATER U SIZE AND SYMBOL COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME W 0 C:)0 SUN/SHADE QTY � ,,,,;_ HEIGHT SPREAD USE 0 CONDITION BBG Big Bluestem Grass Andropogon gerardii 4-6' 2-3' Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 8 VFR Vaiegated Feather Reed Grass Calamagrostis acutiflora 'Avalanche' 34 18-24" Low Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 16 FRG Feather Reed Grass Calamagrostis acutiflora'Karl Foerster' 4-5' 18-24" Low Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 11 KOR Korean Feather Reed Grass Calamagrostis brachytricha 34 2-3' Low Shade 5 Gallon Cont 30 BBF Boulder Blue Fescue Grass Festuca glauca 'Boulder Blue' 8-12" 8-10" Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 30 RJB Red Baron Japanese Blood Grass Imperata cylindrica'Red Baron' 12-18" 12-18" Medium Adaptable 1 Gallon Cont 6 VMG Variegated Maiden Grass Miscanthus sinensis'Variegalus' 4-5' 24 Medium Sun / Part Shade 5 Gallon Cont 19 RMM Regal Mist Muhiy Grass Muhlenbergia capillaris Regal Mist 34 34 Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 21 HMS Heavy Metal Blue Switch Grass Panicum virgatum'Heavy Metal' 34 12-18" Low Sun 5 Gallon Cont 22 PLG Plume Grass Saccharum ravennae 8-12' 34 Medium Sun 5 Gallon Cont 6 PERENNIALS 18)60SYMBOL MATURE MATURE WATER SIZE AND COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SUN/SHADE QTY HEIGHT SPREAD USE SPACING BSR Black Snakeroot Actaea racemosa racemosa 'Brunette' 4-6' 2-3' Medium Sun / Part Shade 4" Pot/ 36" O.C. 12 FLI False Indigo Baptisia australis 34 2-3' Low Sun / Part Shade 4" Pot/ 36" O.C. 18 WBH White Bleeding Heart Dicentra spectabilis'Alba' 24 18-24" Medium Shade 4" Pot/ 24" O.C. 15 OGD Orange Daylily Hemerocallis'Rocket City' 34 2-3' Low Sun 4" Pot/ 24" O.C. 19 RHP Red-hot Poker Kniphota uvaria 34 24 Low Sun 4" Pot/ 36" O.C. 20 PGF Purple Gayfeather Liatris spicata'Floristan Violet 24 18-24" Low Sun 4" Pot/ 36" O.C. 31 PES Purple Emperor Stonecrop Sedum'Purple Emperor' 12-18" 12-18" Low Sun 4" Pot/ 18" O.C. 23 SOD .yam ° 90 / 10 Fescue/Bluegrass Mix . t. 1. ALL LOW PERENNIAL AND GROUNDCOVER PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED WESTERN RED CEDAR WOOD MULCH, AT A DEPTH OF 3". WEED BARRIER FABRIC IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER WOOD MULCH. 2. ALL PLANTING BED AREAS NOT DESIGNATED AS COBBLE SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 1-1 /2" DARK GRAY ANGULAR GRANITE, AT A DEPTH OF 3", INSTALLED OVER PERMEABLE WEED BARRIER FABRIC. DO NOT INSTALL EDGING BETWEEN WOOD MULCH AND ROCK MULCH AREAS. 3. ALL PLANTING BED AREA DESIGNATED AS COBBLE SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 5-10" NATURAL GRAY COBBLE OVER PERMEABLE WEED BARRIER FABRIC. FILL IN GAPS WITH 3/4" ROCK MULCH OR PEA GRAVEL OF SIMILAR COLOR TO COBBLE SO THAT NO FABRIC IS VISIBLE 4. SOD EDGER SHALL BE 14 GAUGE ROLLED TOP STEEL EDGING (DARK GREEN COLOR) IN THE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. EDGER IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE SOD ABUTS CONCRETE. 5. ALL AREAS TO BE LANDSCAPED SHALL HAVE ORGANIC AMENDMENTS THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED INTO THE SOIL AT A RATE OF 5 CUBIC YARDS PER 1 ,000 SQUARE FEET, AND TILLED TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 6. ALL SOD AREAS, BED AREAS, AND LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE FINE GRADED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF NEW PLANT MATERIAL. ROCKS, WOOD, AND ANY MATERIAL LARGER THAN 1 " IN DIAMETER SHALL BE REMOVED FROM ALL PLANTING AREAS PRIOR TO SODDING AND PLANTING NEW MATERIALS. 7. EXISTING TURF, SHRUBS, TREES, AND PLANT MATERIAL TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE FULLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE, INCLUDING ALL ROOTS. 8. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE WATERED BY A FULLY AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. 9. SOD AREAS SHALL BE ZONED SEPARATELY THAN BEDS, AND SHALL BE IRRIGATED VIA POP-UP SPRAY HEADS PROVIDING FULL (HEAD TO HEAD) COVERAGE. HEADS SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE WITH REPLACEABLE NOZZLES, PRESSURE REGULATORS, AND CHECK VALVES. 10. BED AREAS SHALL BE ZONED SEPARATELY THAN SOD AREAS, AND SHALL BE IRRIGATED BY INDIVIDUAL DRIP EMITTERS TO EACH PLANT. DRIP COMPONENTS SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE RAIN -BIRD OR EQUAL POINT SOURCE EMITTERS, WITH ALL PLANTS RECEIVING IRRIGATION. PLANT MATERIAL NOTES AND SPECIFICATIONS 1. NO SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. VARIETIES HAVE BEEN CHOSEN FOR THEIR SPECIFIC CHARACTERISTICS. 2. CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO TAGGING PLANT MATERIALS FOR THE PROJECT, TO CONFIRM WHETHER OR NOT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WANTS TO BE PRESENT TO SELECT ANY OF THE PLANT MATERIAL FOR THE PROJECT. 3. REQUIREMENTS FOR MEASUREMENTS, GRADING, BRANCHING, QUALITY, AND THE BALLING AND BURLAPPING OF PLANTS LISTED IN THE PLANT LIST SHALL FOLLOW THE CURRENT ISSUE OF AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK ISSUED BY THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. (ANSI -Z 60.1 , OR MOST CURRENT PUBLICATION). 4. PLANTS SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE MEASUREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE PLANT LIST, WHICH ARE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE SIZES. 5. ALL MATERIALS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO INSPECTION AND APPROVAL. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT WORK AND MATERIALS THAT THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FEELS DO NOT MEET THESE SPECIFICATIONS, PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. 6. PLANTS ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM WEATHER AND SUN WHEN BEING STORED AT THE SITE. KEEP ROOTS MOIST AT ALL TIMES. 7. EACH PLANT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY MEANS OF A GROWERS LABEL AFFIXED TO THE PLANT. REMOVE ALL LABELS AFTER PLANTING AND MAKE LABELS AVAILABLE TO THE OWNER OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 8. FOR BALLED AND BURLAPPED TREES AND SHRUBS, REMOVE BURLAP FROM THE TOP AND SIDES OF THE ROOT BALL, BUT NOT THE BOTTOM, AFTER SETTING THE ROOT BALL IN THE HOLE. A MINIMUM OF 3/4 OF THE WIRE BASKET AND SURPLUS NYLON OR BINDING SHALL BE COMPLETELY REMOVED. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION SITE AREA CALCULATIONS DESCRIPTION REQ. PROVIDED LOT SIZE 7 82,849 SF MINIMUM OPEN SPACE (30%) 24,855 SF (34%) 28,083 SF PUBLIC N/A (19%) 15,586 SF USABLE N/A (42%) 6,541 SF - SOD N/A (25%) 1,606 SF - HARDSCAPE N/A (75%) 4,935 SF PRIVATE N/A (15%) 12,497 SF USABLE N/A (42-80%) 5,239 - 9,998 SF - SOD N/A (0%) 0 SF - HARDSCAPE N/A (100%) 5,239 - 9,998 SF STREETSCAPE CALCULATIONS DESCRIPTION REQ. PROVIDED UPHAM STREET - 213 LF (213 LF / 30) x 1 TREE 7 8 TREES TOTAL LANDSCAPING CALCULATIONS DESCRIPTION REQ. MINIMUM PROVIDED TREE (24,855 / 1,000) x 1 25 TREES 42 TREES SHRUBS (24,855 / 1,000) x 10 249 SHRUBS 283 SHRUBS s . �\0 PUBLIC 169 SHRUBS O Ah *PRIVATE 114+ (MIN. 3 /YARD) NOTE: * PRIVATE YARD SHRUB LOCATIONS AND SPECIES T.B.D., SEE YARD EXHIBIT FOR DETAILS (DETAIL E, SHEET 14) .� ,oft �" • Call 3 business days in advance before you dig, grade, or excavate for the marking of underground member utilities PROJECT NUMBER 18035 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER JG REVIEWER MC , s . �\0 0 C\1 x�� O Ah cil OUTDOOR - DESIGN GROUP www.ODGDESIGN.COM OUTDOOR DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5690 WEBSTER STREET ARVADA, CO 80002 (303) 993-4811 Z 00 00 00 rn Q Lu LU � o C14 00 0 C\1 (D Iq Z < C� � C'7 O ('7 � w J J0 Q � M O > C) � -_-Q 0 J O(D - _j W > ONS qq C Z LLQ (0 0 0 W< Q � U 0 N z 0 LL Q C:) U U o C/) Q W 0 C:)0 - U) U) 0 Q 12 OF 16. J' 00 00 00 rn W o C14 0 C14 0 C\1 0 C\1 Q O N N O M O 00 O O) O N O z O_ I— Cl U C/) w 0 Q z CD - m m m - m U-) 00 > U) U) U) > w a o a 0 a 0 a 0 Q::� C0 U) U) U) C0 z 0 z� OW — m O 0 0 N 0 M 0 w �z LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANT LIST 12 OF 16. J' LANDSCAPE PLAN rH-'� 6' PRIVACY FENCE 14 PROPERTY LINE 1-RUS 1 -SSL 5 -HMS PRIVATE YARD, rF-"'�SEE EXHIBIT. q4,,) 3HORIZONTAL RAIL FENCE ROCK MULCH 1 -ABP (�G-� 3-MTP 14 FENCE COLUMN 3 -PGF SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE: NO FENCES OR LANDSCAPE TO EXCEED 36" IN HEIGHT, STREET TREES OMITTED. 4-VFR FIRE HYDRANT, NP. rff"'� ENTRY SIGN q4,,) 3 -PGF 2 -MTP 1 -ABP 2 -HMS 2 -HMS 7 -SCP 2 -HMS F 3' HORIZONTAL RAIL FENCE 14 C 2 -HMS � 7 -SCP D 2 -HMS III 2 -HMS M 1 -ABP M � 2 -MTP 2 -PGF 3 -PES rff'� ENTRY SIGN q4�) 4-RMM SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGLE: NO FENCES OR LANDSCAPE TO EXCEED 36" IN HEIGHT, STREET TREES OMITTED. 3 -PGF 4 -PES 2 -MTP 1 -ABP rG-� 2 -MTP 114 FENCE COLUMN F 14,) 3HORIZONTAL RAIL FENCE PROPERTY LINE 5 -HMS 1 -SSL 1-RUS STEEL EDGER G 14 FENCE COLUMN H6' PRIVACY FENCE 14 PROPERTY LINE RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECFC DEVELOPMENT PLAN �N WHEAT RUGE, COLORADO APART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO n Mr"i F-- MSM 6' PRIVACY FENCE ('-H 14 STEEL EDGER, TYP. I F 3' HORIZONTAL RAIL FENCE q4,,,) 3HORIZONTAL RAIL FENCE F I 14 I 6' PRIVACY FENCE H 14 I I I 1► ' 0 10' 20' 40' SCALE:1 "=20' LANDSCAPE LEGEND 000 o°o0 0 PRIVATE YARD EXHIBIT NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION (SEE SHEET L1 FOR FULL PLANT LIST) DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES ORNAMENTAL TREES EVERGREEN TREES DECIDUOUS SHRUBS EVERGREEN SHRUBS ORNAMENTAL GRASSES PERENNIALS BOULDERS PRIVATE YARD LANDSCAPING SOD COBBLE & FENCE & PRIVACY FENCE i oNincropp Rpn Tr) MKIToiNi o RAIMInAUM 4 0 5' 10, SCALE:1 "=5' NOTES: 1. A MINIMUM OF 20% OF EACH PRIVATE YARD MUST BE DESIGNATED AS A LANDSCAPE BED WITH A MINIMUM OF 1 SHRUB PER 20 SF OF LANDSCAPE BED AREA. ADDITIONAL SHRUBS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES, AND PERENNIAL PLANTINGS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED. 2. LANDSCAPE BED AREAS MUST BE MULCHED WITH 3" DEPTH 1-1/2" DARK GRAY ANGULAR GRANITE (NO PINKS, REDS, OR BROWNS) 3. SHREDDED WESTERN RED CEDAR MULCH MAY BE USED AT A 3" DEPTH UNDER PERENNIALS, GROUND COVERS, AND AROUND THE BASE OF TREES AND SHRUBS. NO DYED MULCHES PERMITTED 4. ANY TREE PLANTINGS SHOWN WITHIN THE PRIVATE YARDS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (SHEET 10) ARE REQUIRED. 5. CUSTOMIZABLE SPACE OPTIONS TO BE INSTALLED BY DEVELOPER. wo^rb ftw aS iJ 9T] SY it :i. f _ t� S'1 _ _ _ - r _ Y r) U J � Call 3 business days in advance before you dig, grade, or excavate for the marking of underground member utilities PROJECT NUMBER 18035 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER LU �00 JG REVIEWER 0 MC is .00 zQ U j 75 (y) 0 (� 0) LU .00 Q x� � � O � FSS�ON AL -0 OUTDOOR —DESIGN GROUP— WWW.ODGDESIGN.COM OUTDOOR DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5690 WEBSTER STREET ARVADA, CO 80002 (303) 993-4811 z co co co M Q Lu LU �00 o 0 0 0 Iq zQ U j 75 (y) 0 (� 0) LU J JO Q 00 ('-, '7 o� O i U I. -.p J N (.C)�Q (C) W (D> J Ill O c) z LLJ CD ~ O 0 w � Q � U (D N=o Q o U U oQ LU C)o 0- U) U) cis I I 13 OF 16 J' co co co M W o 0 0 0 Q O O co N N O co O M O N O z CD t2 cis LLJ 0 Q z m m CD m m CO U) U) U) > LLJ 0- o a 0 a 0 a 0 0::� CO U) U) U) CO z 0 I N M I II- z ow — m O C) N M 0 0 0 LLJ �z LANDSCAPE PLAN I I 13 OF 16 J' RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SPECFC D PLAN Ill WHEAT RCOLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PLANTING DETAIL FOR SHRUBS, AND ALL PLANTING DETAIL FOR PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, PLANTING DETAIL FOR ALL TREES & B&B SHRUBS ��� CONTAINER PLANTS LARGER THAN 1 GALLON �r,� &ALL CONTAINER PLANTS 1 GALLON OR SMALLER N.T.S. \ � N.T.S. \ � N.T.S. DO NOT CUT LEADER PRUNE IMMEDIATELY PRIOR TO PLANTING 1/2(X) (X) 1/2(X) ENTRY SIGN 8' MAX USE NYLON TREE STRAPS AT END OF WIRE (EVERGREEN TREES ONLY) 24" LENGTH BY 3/4 DIA. P.V.C. MARKERS (TYP.) OVER WIRES 12 GAUGE GALVANIZED WIRE USE 3 GUY ASSEMBLIES FOR EVERGREENS, AND TREES OVER 3" CALIPER 24" LENGTH BY 3/4 DIA. P.V.C. MARKERS (TYP.) OVER WIRES TOP OF ROOT FLARE SHALL BE 3" ABOVE GRADE OUTSIDE OF PIT. 3" DEPTH SPECIFIED MULCH. PULL MULCH AWAY FROM TRUNK. MULCH TO 6" OUTSIDE OF STAKES. (PROVIDE 24" RADIUS WOOD MULCH RING WHEN PLANTING IN NATIVE GRASS AREAS) TREATED WOOD POST WITH GROMMETED NYLON STRAPS. USE TWO GUY WIRES NOTES: 1. INSTALL WATERING SAUCER IN NATIVE AREAS. 2. CONSTRUCT 6" HEIGHT WATERING RING FOR INITIAL WATERING. REMOVE IN SOD AREAS PRIOR TO MULCHING. 3. AFTER SEPTEMBER 1 ST, INSTALL 4" TREE TAPE ON DECIDUOUS TREES FROM 6" OFF THE GROUND TO THE FIRST BRANCH. REMOVE PROMPTLY IN SPRING. 4. COMPLETELY REMOVE WIRE BASKET, ALL TWINE & PLASTIC. REMOVE BURLAP OFF TOP 2/3 OF BALL. 5. FILL PLANT PIT WITH 1/2 SPECIFIED SOIL MIX AND 1/2 PIT SOIL. NOTE: 1. ONLY GALVANIZED AND/OR COATED METALS TO BE USED TO PREVENT RUST STAINS. 2. POWDER COATING COLOR AND FONT TYPE T.B.D. 3. SEE FENCE COLUMN DETAIL (DETAIL G, SHEET 14) FOR FOOTING DETAIL. GATE N.T.S. PRECAST CONCRETE CAP WITH 2" OVERHANG GALVANIZED STEEL SIGN, POWDER COATED, FONT AND COLORS T.B.D. DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK, ALIGNED 2 BLOCKS DEEP FOR 8" DEPTH SPECIFIED PLANTINGS, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN ON SHEET 13 FOR INFORMATION. SET TOP OF ROOT BALL 1" HIGHER THAN THE FINISHED BED GRADE IN _ - SPECIFIED MULCH- CAREFULLY TUCK - MULCH AROUND EACH PLANT (PROVIDE 12" RADIUS WOOD MULCH RING WHEN PLANTING IN NATIVE GRASS AREAS) LOOSEN SIDES OF PLANT PIT AND WATER THE FILL IN WELL TO ELIMINATE NOTES: LARGE AIR POCKETS 1. PRUNE ALL DEAD OR DAMAGED BRANCHES PRIOR TO, AND AFTER PLANTING. 2. CRUMBLING OR BROKEN ROOT BALLS WILL BE REJECTED. 3. DIG PLANT PIT TWICE AS WIDE AND HIGH AS CONTAINER. 4. TAKE CARE NOT TO DAMAGE ROOT BALL WHEN REMOVING THE PLANT FROM IT'S CONTAINER. 5. FOR ALL PLANTS IDENTIFIED WITH WATER USE OF "LOW" OR "VERY LOW" ON THE PLANT LIST, KEEP WOOD MULCH 2" BACK FROM TRUNK OR STEM. 6. FILL PLANT PIT WITH 1/2 SPECIFIED SOIL MIX AND 1/2 PIT SOIL. 7. SCORE ROOT BOUND ROOT BALLS TO FREE UP ROOTS. 3' HORIZONTAL RAIL FENCE 8' MAX coCO NOTE: 1. THE SIDE OF FENCE WITH POSTS EXPOSED TO FACE INWARD TOWARD PRIVATE YARDS. DOG WASTE STATION N.T.S. 4"X4" CEDAR POST 2"X6" CEDAR RAILS 2"X2" CEDAR RAILS BEVEL TOP OF CONCRETE AWAY FROM POST CONCRETE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" DEPTH COMPACTED GRAVEL O.C. SPACING 2-1/4" OR 4" SIZE PLANT MATERIAL AS SPECIFIED ON THE PLANT LIST SPECIFIED MULCH- CAREFULLY TUCK MULCH AROUND 0 01.0 EACH PLANT TO PREVENT THE SMALL PLANTS FROM DRYING OUT (PROVIDE 8" RADIUS WOOD MULCH RING WHEN PLANTING IN NATIVE GRASS AREAS) PLANTING BED SOIL- AMENDED PER SPECIFICATIONS O UNLESS A FORMAL PATTERN IS CALLED FOR, OO O PLACE PLANTS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF O THE PLANTING AREA FIRST, THEN FILL IN THE O CENTER RANDOMLY AND AVOID CREATING "ROWS" NOTE: IF INDIVIDUAL PLANT LOCATIONS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN, SPACE PLANTS AT THE O.C. SPACING SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST FENCE COLUMN N.T.S. GATE, SEE PLAN FOR LOCATION 12" CONCRETE CAP WITH 2" OVERHANG 3' 4"X4" CEDAR POST �O 00 12"X12"X4" DECORATIVE CONCRETE BLOCK, ALIGNED 2 BLOCKS DEEP 00 FOR 8" TOTAL DEPTH �O 00 CONCRETE M I�IIIII a CMU BLOCK CONCRETE FOOTER COMPACTEDGRAVEL COMPACTED SUBGRADE 19 NOTES: 1. QUANTITY:9 2. LOCATION: ONLY ALONG UPHAM STREET, SEE SHEET 13 3. THE SIDE OF FENCE WITH POSTS AND HARDWARE EXPOSED TO FACE INWARD TOWARD PRIVATE YARDS. CLUSTER MAIL BOX NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION BOULDER N HT. OF BOULDER _NIIIII. 1/4( X) I= PLACE FLATTEST SIDE COMPACTED OF BOULDER DOWN SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. CONTACT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF BOULDERS. 2. BURY 1/4 OF THE TOTAL HEIGHT OF EACH BOULDER INTO THE GROUND. 3. PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM EACH BOULDER. 4. THOROUGHLY COMPACT, PUDDLE AND STABILIZE BACKFILL, AND SURROUNDING GRADES PRIOR TO COMPLETION. 5. DO NOT PLACE BOULDERS IN FLOWLINE OF SWALES OR ANY LOCATION WHERE DRAINAGE COULD BE INHIBITED BY BOULDERS. 6' PRIVACY FENCE N.T.S. SIZE AND TYPE OF BOULDER PER MATERIALS SCHEDULE AND SPECIFICATIONS l71oo SPECIFIED MULCH FINISH GRADE SLOPE AWAY FROM BOULDER u0A NOTES: 1. THE SIDE OF FENCE WITH POSTS EXPOSED TO FACE ADJACENT PROPERTIES, NOT INWARD TOWARD DEVELOPMENT. BENCH CONCRETE FOOTING 4" DEPTH COMPACTED GRAVEL NOTES: 1. DOGIPOT ALUMINUM PET STATION #17PW-00005 2. ON -LEASH SIGN CHOICE (ITEM #1203/1204) 3. POWDER COATED FOREST GREEN 4. ANCHORED IN CONCRETE FINISH GRADE NOTES: 1. MODEL: #3313 SALSBURY CLUSTER BOX UNIT (F SERIES) 2. QUANTITY:3 3. COLOR: BRONZE 4.13 B SIZE DOORS, 1 PARCEL LOCKER, 1 OUTGOING MAIL COMPARTMENT N.T.S. CEDAR POST 'CEDAR ETS 'CEDAR NGERS ZETE TH kCTED GRAVEL of o rJ a '1'1 it _ _ i'_ 'i. _ _ _ `1 LJ J ti Call 3 business days in advance before you dig, grade, or excavate for the marking of underground member utilities PROJECT NUMBER v PROJECT DATE N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. N.T.S. O --REGIS .00 s . o �\0 .00 x�� O Ah 00 0 0 PET SIGN 18"H x 11.5"W 18 TOP VIEW j 75 (y)(� O CLASP & HANDLE 3 .63 GAUGE REFLECTIVE PET WASTE Q c) 00 -, ('7 co > Z) 6' 0 ALUMINUM , mnxP n�ev (D Q _j LU O qq p z L N (0 � ~ C) ° O°°aPE. � Q � U 0 N I I Q �� �� 2X2 CEDAR RAILS BAG DISPENSER U PLEASE KEEP C Q L 0 2"X6" CEDAR RAILS 15.5"H x 9.4"W x 3.25°D FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW I I I I 4"X4" CEDAR POST .08 GAUGE POWDER COATED ALUMINUM 400 BAG CAPACITY C/) o o 30.5" 17" I I I I 7"7 M HINGE � Q II II CO o o z - m m - CD STEEL TRASH ° ° ° m o C/-) C0 > U) U) co NOTE: RECEPTACLE °°°° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° °°° a a o 0 0 0 Q::� 1. SEE FENCE DETAIL (F/14) FOR FOOTINGS. WITH LID U) ° ° ° ° °°° 9® - - 00 CN 2 THE SIDE OF FENCE WITH POSTS AND HINGES EXPOSED 23"H x 1 1.5°DIA. z °°°°°°° o®o N M 14- NOTES: TO FACE INWARD TOWARD PRIVATE YARDS. 16 GAUGE POWDER 99 O C) N M 1. MODEL: EV26 KEYSTONE RIDGE EVERETT BENCH WITH BACK 6' COATED ALUMINUM 6 6 6 a w 2. QUANTITY: 2 10 GALLON CAPACITY z 06 LANDSCAPE DETAILS _ 3. COLOR: BRONZE POWDER COATED CONCRETE FOOTING 4" DEPTH COMPACTED GRAVEL NOTES: 1. DOGIPOT ALUMINUM PET STATION #17PW-00005 2. ON -LEASH SIGN CHOICE (ITEM #1203/1204) 3. POWDER COATED FOREST GREEN 4. ANCHORED IN CONCRETE FINISH GRADE NOTES: 1. MODEL: #3313 SALSBURY CLUSTER BOX UNIT (F SERIES) 2. QUANTITY:3 3. COLOR: BRONZE 4.13 B SIZE DOORS, 1 PARCEL LOCKER, 1 OUTGOING MAIL COMPARTMENT N.T.S. CEDAR POST 'CEDAR ETS 'CEDAR NGERS ZETE TH kCTED GRAVEL of o rJ a '1'1 it _ _ i'_ 'i. _ _ _ `1 LJ J ti Call 3 business days in advance before you dig, grade, or excavate for the marking of underground member utilities PROJECT NUMBER 18035 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER JG REVIEWER MC O --REGIS .00 s . o �\0 .00 x�� O Ah nit OUTDOOR - DESIGN GROUP WWW.ODGDESIGN.COM OUTDOOR DESIGN GROUP, INC. 5690 WEBSTER STREET ARVADA, CO 80002 (303) 993-4811 z C0 C0 C0 M Q Lu I— LU LU o 00 0 0 Iq z < j 75 (y)(� O � L J J0 Q c) 00 -, ('7 co > Z) 0 0 Q J (0- o (D Q _j LU O qq p z L N (0 � ~ C) w � Q � U 0 N = 0 Q o U U C Q L 0 Cn U 1 14 OF 16 J' C0 C0 C0 M w o 0 0 0 Q O NT O co N N O C0 0 M 0 N o CD U C/) w o Q z - m m - CD m m C/-) C0 > U) U) co w o 0 0 0 Q::� C0 U) U) 07 C0 z 13� N M 14- z� O w M O C) N M 6 6 6 w z LANDSCAPE DETAILS 1 14 OF 16 J' RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 00 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0'0 'I 0.0 +0.� W I 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +OC D 11 w O 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. Lu V 0.0 +0� 0.0 +C O M0 0 +0.� +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0 0 +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 Schedule Symbol Label QTY Catalog Number Description Lamp GO Number Lamps Lumens per Lamp LLF Wat stage U) GO GO "Po GO GO WW ^ Q CD 0 EL 0 0 GO GO GO GO z v � z � O W MM O 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. 9 0.0 +0.p O O L�.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 + +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 t0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 38 WS -W37612 WALL SCONCE 1 850 0.85 16.5 A 4 B 38 SHARP(8) A032614 LED 3000K PHILIPS 1 1388 0.85 19 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 OIO +O p O r+o o +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 O II- +0.1 +0.0 + 0 0 +0.0 +0.0 +O C O C 20 6643-30BZ LANDSCAPE BOLLARD LIGHT NA 1 548.5925 0.85 13.2336 -0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.� 0 0 +01 0 . +0.0 +0.0 ® . °.°. # {+ + + + + +fl:1 + +Q1 0 +0.0 +0.0 +o.0 a a :.. N so+ °1 0'J ;� 1• D 18 6091 MINI BOLLARD NA 1 98.82359 0.85 3.0 I C '. ,� . _ 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. 0.0 I +QrNI 0 +0.1 +0.1 Q 0 0.0 +02 + o 0 0 O o 0. + 0. o 0 a 0 + - + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. C 0 +1.9 „ Fr I B 0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. 0.0 +O.JI 1 +0.3 + +4.2 +0.3 +0 1� + •. 0• 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 / U L Statistics O+ • e Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. } 0.0 +O. 1 LT, +1.4 +0.2 +fle �. •+0 0 0+0.0 0.0 +0.0 �0.0 +0. C Calc Zone #1 + 0.2 is 6.6 is 0.0 is N/A N/A c B 71 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + 0 O.JI +0 +4.0 +0.3 +.� 00. 00'0 + + + 0.0 +0.0/ +0.0 +O .0 I O O + 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.� 0.0 + 0 + 0 0 + +0.8 +0.1 0.0 X0.0 +0.0 +O.0 2 I`B B B B B B B B B I �0.0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. 0 +O.NI 0 O.OI +0. +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.0 +0.1 +0.3 +1.7 +0.9 +1.7 +0.9 +1.6 +0.8 +1.3 +0.8 +0.2 +0.2 +0.3 +1.4 +0.9 +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +1.0 +1.0 +1.1 +1.2 +0.8 0.1 +0.0 +O .0 0.0 +0.0 -0+0.0 +0.0 0 �0.� I 0 O.OI +O.b +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.3 +1.4 +0.9 +1.1 +1.5 +1.5 +1.3 +1.6 +1.2 +1.6 +1.3 +1.7 +1.0 0.1 woo "'•0.0 +O .0 I 4 - 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + On + 0 0 + 0. 0. + 0.0 + 0.4.1 'TO 'TO 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 +� 0.0 0.1 0.6 + 0.1 + 0.0 + 0.0 + B B B B B B 0.0 'o .0 'o .0 + O.0 00 + 00 00 0. o I`d� I 10 a2 0 0 00 0.1 000. ° ° o 00 00 0o LIv+ o0 00 + oc . o i I�3 I�+O. B O o 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 + 0 10.0 6.6 +0.4 +0.1 E + + �+ 1 +0.0 +0.0 + C 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 w 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +O. C + 0 0.� 1 +1.3 +0.3 ++� 0.0 'Do +0 0 +01_ +0.6 +0.1 +0.0 + +0E 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. C 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. + 0 C O. 1I 02 +0. 7 +0.4 0.2 9 • +0.0 'Loo '00 ` '00 0 +0.0 +0.0 + 00.0 +0.2 + 6 +0.7 '0? +0.5 +0.3 +0.4 +0.� +0.4 +0.2 + 4 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0. C �Ii o ,; 0.0 +00,.p +00 + ITO 0 0.0 +00 100 X00 +.0 0�0 + 0A + + + +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 1.1 0.3 0 �Q +0.0 +00 +0.�1 +0. +0.4 *1 +0 + +0.0 +0.0 +TUU + +. +. +. +. - + + + +O +0.o +o 0.0 �.0 CI-i'o.Q 1 02 7 i' :1 0', O 0 0.0 a 8- 0 0.0 .o .0 VIIIIt n a 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. 0.0 t0.� 1 +1.0 +0.3 + 70 +0.1 +0.0 + 0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 2 �+ - 0.0 + 0.0 + 00 + 0.0 0 0 4 1 2 + 1. + B5.6 + 0.3 + 0.1 + 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 Oo 1 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0 0 0.0 Lv 0.0 + 0.0 + o S 0.0 +0.0 +00 +0 008 SET 0 +0. +1.0 +0.20 0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.5 To + +0.0 +0.0 + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 ° vnN ACCESSIBLE C L 0.0 +0.0 +0 0 +0 + .0 O.Q 0 + + + + +0.4 +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0 0 +O 1 itr4 +D D I0 +O n + D 0 0.0 +0.0 +O .0 B B B B B B 0.0 +0.0 +10 +0. to.� 0I 0 I +0.1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.3 +1.1 +0.8 +1.2 +0.8 +1.2 +0.8 +1.2 +0.8 +1.2 +0.6 +1.0 +0.6 1 +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 I I - 0.0 + 0.0 + 00 + 0. 0 'IO.a it 0 + 0.0 +'TOIw 0.0 'Loo 'Loo .1.0.1 + 02 + 1.3 + 1.1 + 1.1 .6 .2 .6 .2 + .6 0.3 + 02 + 0.4 + 21 .2 + 23 .1 + 24 .2 + 25 .1 + 2.1 + 1. 0.1 o I /+ 0.0 O.0 0.0 +0.0 +0 0 +0. 0 tog 0 + +1.1 +0.1 O a.7 0+ B B B B B 0 +0 0 +0.0 +0. C - 0.0 + 0.0 + 00 +Y 0 . 0 Oq 1 0 + 0. +� 5 + 0.4 0.1 O &.1 •..: 0 +0.0 +0. 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. C n a+ Io 0.0 +0.0 +00 +0. 0 I0.0 1 + +1.8 +0.3 Ovt �.0 6 •. +0.0 +0.0 +O .0 + A A A A A A A A T _ 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 I0. 3 �.2 +0.4 0. + +0.0 ' 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0. C + + + ° 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 Q 0 O 1 0.1 + + 2.0 + 0.2 0 + + 000 + 0.1 + 0. 07 + 0.� 06 0.30 0.4 + + 1 o I$ °• + o0.0 + 02 0 + 04 + �0. +n 4 + ® + 04 + 0 + 3 + 0.1 "To .0 +0 .0 + O.0 �60 + EMT 0.0 +04 O +0.0 +0. 0 X0.0 + 0 ° + + 0 +0.0 +0.0 +O.0 - 0.0 + 0.0 + 0. + 0 i4 0.0 I + 0 I + 0.0 0.0 x0.0 - '0 0.0 '0uu O6\ - �- 0.0 - +U -F- '0 0.0 XD.O 0ti X'10-7 .1- + -0T 'EDv �.g\ + 0- + �:0 X -+0.0 00-X00 +4-4- + +0 �.0 + �6.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 + 0.0 'To 0.0 'To 0.0 DL w+ 0.0 + 0.0 + aC 0.0 +0.0 +0. +0. + 0 0 0 + 0 I +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 1 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0 +0.0 +0.0 +0C �� - GAS 0 0 +o o +o +o. o o + o +o o +o o 'Loo +o F710 o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o o +o 0 o +o o +o o +o c 0 o III � I 0.0 +0.0 +0. +O.0 0 D + 0 I +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0 I +0.0 +0.0 +0. C FS -]N 1 SITEPHOTOMETRIC PLAN SCALE'. 1" = 20' 0 5' 10' 20 40' 60' 80' PROJECT NUMBER 00 PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER C3S REVIEWER TNS o N AOF C3S ,WI INCIO RPO RATED - CONSULTING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS 1737 Central Street, Suite ao1 Denver, CO 8o2ii T' 303480.5144 wwwc3sengineeringinc com z 00 00 00 rn < 11-- w o N 0 N 0 N 0 W Q O rLu O Cl) M J N N0 W Q o 0 0 O o J 0 0 a \ U 00 W / C:) WC:) c D 11 w O N < Lu W J LL Q C=) 3: z (/7 U o O Q U) 15 : 16_ 00 00 00 rn W o N 0 N 0 N 0 Q O V O Cl) EE N N0 CO O O o N 0 O 11 IZ U (/7 W Q O m GO GO GO U) GO GO GO GO GO GO WW d 0 0 EL 0 0 GO GO GO GO z v � z � O W MM O N 9 O O O O W � SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 15 : 16_ RIDGETOP VILLAGE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEATRIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MOD - model: WS -W65607 dweLED'' Outdoor Sconce WAC LIGHTING Responsible Lighting® Fixture Type: Catalog Number: Location: Expertly crafted from die cast aluminum.The Mod family features a smooth curved modern shape. ADA compliant and Dark Sky friendly. Ideal for exterior residential, hospitality and commercial applications. Diecast aluminum construction Dark Sky friendly Luminaire may be rotated 180° when mounting ETL & cETL wet location listed, IP65 ADA compliant, low profile design 100% 10% electronic low voltage (ELV) dimming Driver located inside the fixture Universal driver R 20V-22OV-277V) CRI:90 Color Temp: 3000K Rated Life: 70,000 5 year warranty 2 IM°, r T 5y' 'I 14° 14� �oPn 4- FW—S-1 • WS Example: WS -W65607 -BZ Construction: Diecast aluminum construction Light Source: LED Dimming: 100%-1are, Electronic Low Voltage (ELV) Standards: ETL & cETL wet location listed, IP65, ADA compliant, Dark Sky Friendly LED Delivered Watt Lumens Lumens Finish 6" WS -W65607 16.5W 1165 850 BZ Bronze GH Graphite — wadi htin .com Head uarters/Eastern Distribution Center Central Distribution Center Western Distribution Center 9 9 q Phone (800) 526.2588 44 Harbor Park Drive 1600 Distribution Ct 1750 Archibald Avenue Fax 800 526.2585 Port Washington, NY 11050 LithiaSprings, GA 30122 Ontario CA 91760 ( ) 9 WAC Lighting retains the right to modify the design ofourproducts at any time as part ofthe company's continuous improvementprogram. TYPE A C� MOUNTED AT 8'-0'' AT FRONT DOOR FIN - model: WP-LED1 Endurance Wallpack Die cast aluminum factory sealed housings with patent pending design for a water and dust proof IP66 rated outdoor luminaire FEATURES • Factory Sealed LED Light Engine • 20° Forward Throw Illumination • Photo/Motion Sensor Compatible (Sold Separately) • Built-in Level For Easy Adjustment • Suitable to install in all directions • Multi -Function Dimming: ELV (120V) or 0-1 OV 85 CRI • 100,000 hour rated life WAC LIGHTING Responsible Lighting® Fixture Type: Catalog Number: Location: Construction: Die-cast aluminum Power: Integral driver in luminaire. Universal voltage input (120V -277V) Dimming:100%- 30% with 0 - IOV dimmer (120V -27N) 100%-15%with Electronic Low Voltage (ELV) dimmer (120V only) Finish: Architectural Bronze, Graphite, and White Standards: IP66, Wet Location, ETL & cETL Listed Total Harmonic Distortion: 35% Operating Temperature: -40°C F40°F) to 4G`C (1 WF) PHOTOMETRY 90 q5 Left Plane ------ Front Plane 0 Delivered Power Comoarabie Color Temp Lumens CBCP Finish WP-LED119 19W39WHID l 7IN- O� u 66 l—(Re' l-4"-1 iess,wET PRODUCT DESCRIPTION aBZ Die cast aluminum factory sealed housings with patent pending design for a water and dust proof IP66 rated outdoor luminaire FEATURES • Factory Sealed LED Light Engine • 20° Forward Throw Illumination • Photo/Motion Sensor Compatible (Sold Separately) • Built-in Level For Easy Adjustment • Suitable to install in all directions • Multi -Function Dimming: ELV (120V) or 0-1 OV 85 CRI • 100,000 hour rated life WAC LIGHTING Responsible Lighting® Fixture Type: Catalog Number: Location: Construction: Die-cast aluminum Power: Integral driver in luminaire. Universal voltage input (120V -277V) Dimming:100%- 30% with 0 - IOV dimmer (120V -27N) 100%-15%with Electronic Low Voltage (ELV) dimmer (120V only) Finish: Architectural Bronze, Graphite, and White Standards: IP66, Wet Location, ETL & cETL Listed Total Harmonic Distortion: 35% Operating Temperature: -40°C F40°F) to 4G`C (1 WF) PHOTOMETRY 90 q5 Left Plane ------ Front Plane 0 Delivered Power Comoarabie Color Temp Lumens CBCP Finish WP-LED119 19W39WHID www.waclighting.com 30 50 3000K 5000K 1390 1460 1030 1048 aBZ Architectural8ronze Port Washington, NY 11050 27 2700K Warm White WP-LED12] 2]W ]OW HID 30 3000OK 2075 1461 :8Z Architectural Graphite BZ Bronzeon Aluminum 6643 277V N 50 5000K 2135 146] ai Architectural White ' 0 � O WP-LED135 35W 700WHID 30 3000K 2750 1930 U °O O co O� 50 5000K 2825 1921 0 Example: WP-LED119-501 MS -120 -BZ Bronze PC -120 -BZ Bron MS -120 - Gray ze -Ta Motion Sensor Photo Sensor PC-120-GY Gray (120V) MS -120 -WT Whit, � � (130V) PC.14D-WT Whfte WAC Lighting Headquarters/Eastern Distribution Center Western Distribution Center www.waclighting.com 44 Harbor Park Drive • Port Washington, NY 11050 1750 Archibald Avenue • Ontario, CA 91760 Phone 800 526.2588•Fax 800 526.2585 Phone 516 515.5000•Fax 516 515.5050 Phone 800 526.2588•Fax 800 526.2585 WAC Lighting retains the right to modify the design ofourproducts at anytime as partofthe company's continuous improvement program. AUG2017 TYPE B 4 MOUNTED AT 8'-6" ABOVE GARAGE DOOR PARK 12V/120V/277V LED BOLLARD 6641/6642/6643 4" 27" b" PRODUCT DESCRIPTION Sleek linear design blends seamlessly into pathways while providing soft, even illumination FEATURES IP66 rated, Protected against powerful water jets Factory sealed watertight fixtures Mounting accessories included • UL& cUL 1838 Listed (12Vh 1598 Listed (120V/277V) Madel CnIm Tamm Finishes 6643 -BZ Example: 6643-308Z WAC LANDSCAPE LIGHTING Fixture Type: Catalog Number: Location: SPECIFICATIONS 6641 Input: 9-15VAC (Transformer is required) Power: 5.5W / 6.OVA Brightness: Up to 150 In CRI: 90 Rated Life: 60,000 hours Dimming: MLVdimmingonly 6642 Input: 120V Power: 12.SW Brightness: Up to 390 In CRI: 90 Rated Life: 60,000 hours Dimming: TRIAC or ELV dimming 6643 Input: 277V Power: 10.5W Brightness: U to 430 In 9 p CRI: 90 Rated Life: 60,000 hours Dimming: ELV dimming only Mounting accessory included M6000 -STAKE M6640 -CON -KIT 12V 120V/277V s� wadighting.com 27 2700K Warm White BZ Bronzeon Aluminum 6641 12V Phone (800) 526.2588 W Harbor Park Drive 1600 Distribution Ct 30 3000KPure White BK Blackon Aluminum Port Washington, NY 11050 27 2700K Warm White BZ Bronzeon Aluminum 6642 720V to modify the design ofourproducts at anytime as partofthe company's continuous improvement program 30 3000K Pure White BK Blackon Aluminum M 27 2700K Warm White BZ Bronzeon Aluminum 6643 277V N N0 30 3000KPure White BK Blackon Aluminum 6643 -BZ Example: 6643-308Z WAC LANDSCAPE LIGHTING Fixture Type: Catalog Number: Location: SPECIFICATIONS 6641 Input: 9-15VAC (Transformer is required) Power: 5.5W / 6.OVA Brightness: Up to 150 In CRI: 90 Rated Life: 60,000 hours Dimming: MLVdimmingonly 6642 Input: 120V Power: 12.SW Brightness: Up to 390 In CRI: 90 Rated Life: 60,000 hours Dimming: TRIAC or ELV dimming 6643 Input: 277V Power: 10.5W Brightness: U to 430 In 9 p CRI: 90 Rated Life: 60,000 hours Dimming: ELV dimming only Mounting accessory included M6000 -STAKE M6640 -CON -KIT 12V 120V/277V s� wadighting.com Headquarters/Eastern Distribution Center Central Distribution Center Western Distribution Center Phone (800) 526.2588 W Harbor Park Drive 1600 Distribution Ct 1750 Archibald Avenue Fax (800)526.2585 Port Washington, NY 11050 Lithia Springs, GA 30122 Ontario, CA 91760 WAC Lighting retains the right to modify the design ofourproducts at anytime as partofthe company's continuous improvement program TYPE C O LOCATED IN MAIN AREAS AND AT PARK QUAD LED PATH LIGHT 6091 3R' 3'h• 23' WAC LANDSCAPE LIGHTING Fixture Type: Catalog Number: Location: PRODUCT DESCRIPTION SPECIFICATIONS Sleek linear design blends seamlessly into pathways while providing soft, even illumination Input: 9-1 5VAC (Transformer is required) Power: 3.0W / 4.5VA Brightness: Up to 100 In Cith 90 Rated Life: 60,000 hours IP66 rated, Protected against powerful waterjets Factory sealed water tight fixtures Solid diecast corrosion resistant aluminum alloy Recommended spacing for installation: Residential 8 to 1 Oh; Commercial: 5 to 7ft Mounting stake, 6 foot lead wire, and direct burial gel filled wire nuts are included Maintains constant lumen output against voltage drop UL & cut 1838 Listed Color Temo Finish 6091- BZ Example: 6091-30BZ 0. Ire 0.2fc 6' 5' he 3'3" from the source Avg 3 6f xx waclighting.com 27 2700K Warm White Central Distribution Center 6091 Quad Phone (800) 526.2588 BZ Bronzeon Aluminum 1600 Distribution Ct 30 3000K Pure White Fax (800)526.2585 6091- BZ Example: 6091-30BZ 0. Ire 0.2fc 6' 5' he 3'3" from the source Avg 3 6f xx waclighting.com Headquarters/Eastern Distribution Center Central Distribution Center Western Distribution Center Phone (800) 526.2588 44 Harbor Park Drive 1600 Distribution Ct 1750 Archibald Avenue Fax (800)526.2585 Port Washington, NY 11050 Lithia Springs, GA 30122 Ontario, CA 91760 WACLighting retains the right to modify the design ofourproducts at any time as partof the company's continuous improvement program. TYPE D ❑ LOCATED IN PEDESTRIAN PATHS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION LIGHTING NOTE: PROPOSED LUMINAIRES INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY, AQIAC ENT TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, SHALL BE ORIENTED IN SUCH A MANNER OR LIMITED IN LUMEN OUTPUT TO PREVENT GLARE AND SHALL NOTE IXCEED NATIONAL IES LIGHTING STANDARDS FOR DISABILITY GLARE. ALL EXTERIOR LUMINAIRES ARE FULL CUT OFF PROJECT NUMBER co PROJECT DATE 08/20/2018 DESIGNER C3S REVIEWER TNS o N 41 INC3R�D- CONSULTING ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS 1737 Central Street, Suite ao1 Denver, CO Soni T 303 48o 5144 wwwc3sengineeringinc com Z co co co rn W L— o N 0 N /J I..L 0 �W I..I_ Q O rW U) M M J N N0 UJ Q o 0 0 � O N 0 LLO U °O O co O� w () o c0 LL] > 0 0 W W N Q' L Q T 2 W r Q ' V, ,^ _ W J LL 0 C Z U(E o LL] o 13-� Q Q Q F F F co co co rn W L— o N 0 N 0 N 0 Q O V O M N N0 GO O � O N 0 LL - U W J Q Q Q Q F F F F c m J) fn fn fn w 0- - J) o fn fn fn J) o CD W O W M O N M O O O O W � Iz z LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS Alt II Looking southeast from the northern entrance drive Planning Commission 30 Case Nos. GPZ-I8-17, GPZ-18-1$ GPS-18-02 /Ridgetop Village EXHIBIT 10: SUBDIVISION PLAT see attached Planning Commission 31 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village LAND USE SUMMARY TABLE DATA TABLE TRACT USE AREA A PRIVATE ACCESS 313 SQ. FT. / 0.0072 ACRES B PRIVATE ACCESS 3,388 SQ. FT. / 0.0778 ACRES C PRIVATE ACCESS & UTILITY 20,999 SQ. FT. / 0.4821 ACRES D PRIVATE ACCESS 1,073 SQ. FT. / 0.0246 ACRES E PRIVATE ACCESS, UTILITY, OPEN SPACE & PARKING 8,740 SQ. FT. / 0.2006 ACRES F PRIVATE ACCESS 1,698 SQ. FT. / 0.0390 ACRES G PRIVATE ACCESS 319 SQ. FT. / 0.0072 ACRES H PRIVATE ACCESS 3,311 SQ. FT. / 0.0760 ACRES I PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 2,820 SQ. FT. / 0.0647 ACRES LOTS 1-38 40,188 SQ. FT. / 0.9226 ACRES TOTAL NET 80,029 SQ. FT. / 1.8372 ACRES TOTAL GROSS 82,849 SQ. FT. / 1.9020 ACRES Ol/1/NERS'CERT/F/CATE RIDGETOP VILLAGE SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1 SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LINE DATA TABLE LOT NUMBER SQUARE FEET ACRES LOT 1 1,435 0.0329 LOT 2 957 0.0220 LOT 3 1,054 0.0242 LOT 4 940 0.0216 LOT 5 940 0.0216 LOT 6 1,150 0.0264 LOT 7 1,165 0.0267 LOT 8 939 0.0216 LOT 9 939 0.0216 LOT 10 939 0.0216 LOT 11 1,308 0.0300 LOT 12 1,047 0.0240 LOT 13 940 0.0216 LOT 14 940 0.0216 LOT 15 1,048 0.0241 LOT 16 1,168 0.0268 LOT 17 959 0.0220 LOT 18 959 0.0220 LOT 19 959 0.0220 LOT 20 958 0.0220 LOT 21 1,270 0.0292 LOT 22 1,063 0.0244 LOT 23 961 0.0221 LOT 24 961 0.0221 LOT 25 961 0.0221 LOT 26 961 0.0221 LOT 27 1,377 0.0316 LOT 28 957 0.0220 LOT 29 1,434 0.0329 LOT 30 1,182 0.0271 LOT 31 950 0.0218 LOT 32 950 0.0218 LOT 33 1,052 0.0242 LOT 34 1,067 0.0245 LOT 35 950 0.0218 LOT 36 950 0.0218 LOT 37 950 0.0218 LOT 38 1,445 10.0332 TOTAL 40, I88 0.9226 WE, UPHAM PARTNERS LLC, BEING THE OWNERS OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 1.9020 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE EAST 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S41050'16"E A DISTANCE OF 1960.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S00014'00"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID EAST 1/2 A DISTANCE OF 264.61 FEET; THENCE S89039'47"WA DISTANCE OF 328.96 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST 1/2; THENCE N0001 3'09"W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET; THENCE N89039'47"W A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE N00013'09"W ALONG A LINE THAT IS 20.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 209.63 FEET; THENCE N89039'59"E ALONG A LINE THAT IS 132.00 FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID EAST 1/2 A DISTANCE OF 308.89 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL CONTAINS (82,849 SQUARE FEET) 1.9020 ACRES. HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING HEREON CONTAINED INTO LOTS UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF RIDGETOP VILLAGE SUBDIVISION FILING NO 1, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THE PUBLIC THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND DO FURTHER DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES, HYDRANTS, STORMWATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LIGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES THERETO. UPHAM PARTNERS LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BY: NAME: NEIL SHEA TITLE: MANAGING PARTNER STATE OF )SS COUNTY OF THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BY ME THIS DAY OF 20 ,A.D. BY NEIL SHEA. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC l/1/h'EATR/OGEGEODET/C/NFOR/IrIAT/ON. 1. THE CURRENT CITY DATUM COORDINATE SYSTEM USED IS A GROUND-BASED MODIFIED FORM OF THE NAD83/92 STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, COLORADO CENTRAL ZONE 0502. 2. VERTICAL DATUM USED IS THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88). 3. GROUND TO GRID COMBINED SCALE FACTOR IS 0.99974780300, SCALED FROM BASE POINT PHAC 1 (PERMANENT HIGH ACCURACY CONTROL POINT #1) HAVING THE FOLLOWING NAD83/92 STATE PLANE COORDINATES: PHAC 1: NORTHING: 1701258.75, EASTING: 3118217.58, ELEVATION: 5471.62. STATEMENT OFA CCURACY THE GEODETIC POINT COORDINATE DATA SHOWN HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM THE NAD 83 HARN STATE PLANE COLORADO CENTRAL FIPS 0502 COORDINATE SYSTEM, AND HAS A HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION OF 0.07 U.S. SURVEY FEET AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL, AS DEFINED IN THE GEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY STANDARDS OF THE FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE (FGDC-STD-007.2-1998). C 1/4 COR. INDEX DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. E 1/4 COR. SEC. 23 W 44th AVE EASEMENT LAYOUT 3 SEC. 23 U) w ~~ U) W w w 0 w w � w a > w m _ 3: U) 0 < Q a SITE SAF oFSAS cr�V2�i� S 1/4 COR. SEC. 23 W 38th AVE SE COR. VICINITY MAP SEC. 23 SCALE: 1"=500' SURI/EYORSNOTES. 1. THIS SURVEY WAS BASED ON TITLE COMMITMENT NUMBER 598-F0597699-150-KB3, AMENDMENT NO. 10 PREPARED BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY AS AGENT FOR FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF MAY 24, 2018 AT 7:00 A.M., AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY THIS SURVEYOR FOR OTHER EASEMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS OF RECORD. 2. BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE "X" AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD PLAIN ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 08059CO214F LAST REVISED FEBRUARY 5, 2014. NO OFFICE CALCULATIONS OR FIELD SURVEYING WAS PERFORMED TO DETERMINE THIS INFORMATION. 3. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN BEARING S00017'47"E AS REFERENCED ON THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE HORIZONTAL CONTROL NETWORK AND BOUNDED BY THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREON. 4. THIS SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED: R-3 (RESIDENTIAL 3) PER THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. 5. THE ADDRESSES OF THE SURVEYED PROPERTY ARE 4000, 4042, 4062 &4066 UPHAM STREET. THE PROPERTY WILL BE READDRESSED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT. 6. PER COLORADO REVISED STATUTES SEC. 38-51-106 (L), ALL LINEAL UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET. ONE METER EQUALS 39.37 DIVIDED BY 12 U.S. SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. 7. ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT, MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. 8. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS, OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT, LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENT, OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR, PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508 OF THE COLORADO REVISED STATUTES. 9. TRACT I IS HEREBY DEDICATED AS PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 10. INDIVIDUAL TOWNHOUSE LOTS SHALL NOT BE DEVELOPED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN TOWNHOMES. 11. RIDGETOP VILLAGE HOA/METRO DISTRICT AND ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF TRACTS A, B, C, D, E, F, G AND H. 12. RIDGETOP VILLAGE HOA/METRO DISTRICT AND ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS WILL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ALL PRIVATELY OWNED UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. CROSSACCESSEASE/IrIENT RIDGETOP VILLAGE HOA/METRO DISTRICT, AND ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANTS A BLANKET EASEMENT FOR ACCESS, AND TO FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH TRACTS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, AND H. SUCH GRANT OF EASEMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE OWNERS, TENANTS, AND GUESTS OF THE OWNERS, AND SHALL FURTHERMORE GRANT ACCESS TO AND FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH SAID EASEMENTS TO THOSE ENTERING SAID EASEMENTS FROM ABUTTING PUBLIC STREETS. CONSTRUCT/ONDEFECTS THIS PLAT CONTAINS LOTS, BLOCKS, OR OTHER LAND INTENDED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OWNER -OCCUPIED MULTI -FAMILY DWELLING UNITS OR ASSOCIATED COMMON AREAS, LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS, OR IMPROVEMENTS (THE "MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA"). TO THE EXTENT THAT THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS INVOLVE ANY MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA (OR THE IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) WITHIN THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS PLAT, SUCH CLAIMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO BINDING ARBITRATION IN LIEU OF SUBMITTING ANY SUCH CLAIM TO A COURT OF LAW. ANY AND ALL CLAIMS THAT ALLEGE A CONSTRUCTION DEFECT AS DEFINED AT SECTION 26-1302 OF THE CODE OF LAWS AND: (1) ARE BETWEEN ANY TWO OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS OR ENTITIES: (A) ANY OWNER OF ANY PORTION OF THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (B) ANY COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION CREATED WITH RESPECT TO THE MULTI- FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (C) THE SUBDIVIDER, DEVELOPER, CONTRACTOR, OR ANYONE CLAIMING UNDER OR THROUGH ANY SUCH PERSONS, (D) ANY PARTY THAT CONSTRUCTS OR DESIGNS ANY PORTION OF ANY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS UPON THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND (E) ANY CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL AS DEFINED IN THE CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTION REFORM ACT, C.R.S. § 13-80-802.5, ET SEQ., AS AMENDED ("CDARA"); AND (2) THAT PERTAINS TO ANY OF: (A) THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (B) ANY DWELLING UNIT, COMMON AREA DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURE, LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS, OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED ON THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (C) THE COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY TO BE CREATED FOR THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, OR (D) THE DECLARATION OR OTHER DOCUMENTS GOVERNING SUCH COMMUNITY. THE FOREGOING SHALL NOT PRECLUDE ANY OF THE PERSONS OR ENTITIES DESCRIBED ABOVE FROM ENDEAVORING TO RESOLVE ANY SUCH CLAIM(S) THROUGH EITHER NEGOTIATION OR MEDIATION BEFORE SUBMITTING SUCH CLAIM(S) TO BINDING ARBITRATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THAT MAY IMPLEMENT AND EXPAND UPON THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PLAT NOTE AND THAT MAY EXEMPT CERTAIN CLAIMS FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT SUCH CLAIMS MUST BE SUBMITTED TO BINDING ARBITRATION, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT OR CHANGE TO SUCH DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS OR RESTRICTION SHALL NOT ELIMINATE THIS REQUIREMENT THAT CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO BIDING ARBITRATION IN LIEU OF SUBMITTING ANY SUCH CLAIM TO A COURT OF LAW. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT NOTE, BINDING ARBITRATION SHALL MEAN SUBMISSION OF ANY CLAIM DESCRIBED ABOVE TO THE ARBITRATION SERVICE PROVIDER SPECIFIED IN THE DECLARATION OR OTHER GOVERNING DOCUMENTS OF THE COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY, IF QUALIFIED PURSUANT TO THE UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT, PART 2 OF ARTICLE 22 OF TITLE 13, C.R.S., AND, IF NOT, AN ARBITRATION SERVICE PROVIDER SO QUALIFIED IN SUCH ARBITRATION; THE COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ARBITRATION TO BE BORNE EQUALLY BY THE PARTIES. ALL FUTURE PURCHASERS OF ANY INTEREST IN THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA ARE DEEMED TO HAVE ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS PLAT NOTE AND SHALL BE BOUND BY THE PLAT NOTE, WHICH IS RECORDED IN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE, DEEMED TO BE A COVENANT RUNNING WITH THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND BINDING UPON ALL SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, GRANTEES, OWNERS, HEIRS, ASSIGNS, AND ALL OTHERS WHO ACQUIRE AN INTEREST IN OR TO THE MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, TOGETHER WITH ANY COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATED THEREWITH. SUR I/EOR S CERT/F/CA LC I, CHARLES N. BECKSTROM, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY OF RIDGETOP VILLAGE SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1 WAS MADE BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAT ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY. CHARLES N. BECKSTROM COLORADO PLS NO. 33202 C/TYCERT/F/CAT/ON APPROVED THIS ATTEST CITY CLERK DAY OF , 20 BY THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING 001WIWISS/ON CERT/F/CAT/ON MAYOR RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS DAY OF , 20 BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON CLERKANO RECORDER S CERT/F/CATE. ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO THIS DAY OF , 20 JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY CLERK SHEET INDEX DESCRIPTION SHEET NO. COVER SHEET 1 PROPOSED LOT LAYOUT 2 EASEMENT LAYOUT 3 COVER SHEET SHEET 1 OF 3 2 12 30 O 6 20 40 Scale: 1 " = 20' LEGEND PLAT BOUNDARY LINE ADJACENT R.O.W./LOT/PARCEL LINES SECTION LINE ---------- TIE LINE R.O.W./LOT LINE HEREBY CREATED BY THIS PLAT CENTER LINE EXISTING PARCEL LINE HEREBY REMOVED BY THIS PLAT R.O.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY L.S. NO. LAND SURVEYOR NUMBER SECTION CORNER • SET 3/4"x30" PIN & 2" ALUMINUM CAP L.S. NO. 33202 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED RID TOP VILLAGE SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1 SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO C 1 /4 T.3S., R.6 I I IN-707019.90 LI NORTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, T.3S. ,R.69W., OF THE 6TH P.M. N89041'34"E 2627.84' - - - - - - - - - - E.119452.82 - - n 6.50r47.11' _ _ WEST 44TH AVENUE 1313.92' co 1313.92' - 1.89' CORNER OF SECTION 23, o z O Z � I 9W., OF THE 6TH P.M. (PUBLIC R.O.W. VARIES) M a O I ' I P //VT F (FOUND 3 1/4" BRASS CAP L.S. a� = W o CALCULATED SE 1/16 CORNER Chd=N44°42'58"E I % COMMENCEMENT NO. 13212 IN RANGE BOX.) 0 1,435 SQUARE FEET OF SECTION 23 T.3S. R.69W. OF (SET 3/4"x30" REBAR & 3 1/4" N Co �� ' ' �o / I E 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 23, WHEAT RIDGE POINT #14709 4.78' ALUMINUM CAP L.S. NO. 33202) w �� 1- I T.3S., R.69W. OF THE 6TH P.M. LAT: 39°46'35.8539" N LI? STATE PLANE COORDINATES o S�� ' FOUND 3 1/4" BRASS CAP L.S. LONG. 105004'53.1524"W Lu NU- uj N: 1706723.12 E: 3118967.86 O I c i .�/ 1 NO. 13212 IN RANGE BOX. ) N STATE PLANE COORDINATES N: 1708037.64; E: 3117648.92 LOT 2 WHEAT RIDGE CITY DATUM CD R" ' N Co WHEAT RIDGE POINT #14809 H I I N: 707153.66; E: 119754.67 C Co LAT: 39046'35.8741" N WHEAT RIDGE CITY DATUM S39054'58"E ELEVATION: 5. 00 ���/ LONG: 105004'19.5029" W N: 708468.52; E: 118435.38 N89039'59"E 1315.37' - - - - N89046'47"E 44.15' N89°39'5"E 1315 37' STATE PLANE COORDINATES C 1 /4 T.3S., R.6 I I IN-707019.90 LI 20.0' 20.0' 224.42' E.119452.82 CD n 6.50r47.11' _ CD co 40.00' - 1.89' N o z O Z � I � ° O M a O I ' I LOT 1 S89039'08"W `� a� = W o 0.0072 ACRES Chd=N44°42'58"E � z � 0 1,435 SQUARE FEET CD T_ I 1 5.65' 0.0329 ACRES CD 4.78' 0 0 � m N CDf Z w o LI? U� Mev ( z 55.28' w U �L Lu NU- uj � C �Ow� N89046'47"E 47.05' m �¢¢ N `-n LOT 2 NN89039'08"E HQ¢ C, Eo O' 957 SQUARE FEET H I I S00°20'59"E 0.0220 ACRES Co C7 0a- S39054'58"E O0Co 5. 00 O_ =4.50" I _j co O N89046'47"E 44.15' LL p QIw o N89039'08"E 45.01' 0.30' P O CD n - A=90°07'39" 5.08' TRACT B cV N89°46'47"E 22 00' C; IQ 224.42' � n c7 _ CD 0 m o N 0 CD o z O Z Co 00 � W ° O M a O I ' I O °O Z S89039'08"W `� a� = W o 0.0072 ACRES Chd=N44°42'58"E � z � N: 1708051.74; E: 3120276.06 WHEAT RIDGE CITY DATUM Lu j ' N: 708482.61; E: 121063.18 0 0 It D MPLAVV � DD / 1 REC. NO. 2018003341 oo ( ) Co ZONED. - R3 N89039'59"E 308.89' 239.13' TRACT B N00°20'51 "W 14.26' p0//VT OF N89039'53"E 94.13' N89039'09"E 100.27' 7.74' I BEG//V/V//VG 1 IQ 224.42' 20.00' TRACT A=89°52'21" Lu LU� 28.05' Lu 0 Lo � w Q R-6.27 C'1 o 00 � W 313 SQUARE FEET M a O I ' I CIOo S89039'08"W `� a� = W o 0.0072 ACRES Chd=N44°42'58"E Co 00 � o T_>_ L6 I 1 5.65' Co zLCo 4.78' 0 0 � m N w �I LI? U� Mev 0 o Z w U �L Lu NU- uj � C �Ow� o Ln m �¢¢ N `-n HQ¢ NN89039'08"E HQ¢ C, H?¢ Co 44.98' S00°20'59"E Z I ( N 0a- O N O0Co 5. 00 O_ ct)O J I _j co O TRACT D Joao I o �o P O CD z 1 073 SQUARE FEET 0' A=90°07'39" Lu Noow N - � N .54 0.0246 A R=4.00' U ° m ° 0.0316 ACRES� N89046'47"E 40.66'LL L=6.29' O O p m N56::Chd=S45*17'02"E'42"E m O z z N N 7.62' LOT 12 0 5.66' � Z I �j 20.45 1,047 SQUARE FEET N Lu I 20.00 C 0.0240 ACRES 0 c7 N89046'47"E 47.02' 0 0 LL 4.24'LL T_ O 20.00' ° O 20.00' 20.00' Lu 2 O LOT 13 z J N89039'08"E I Z Iq o N 940 SQUARE FEET o 0 H I I 20.00' (0/ Co 0.0216 ACRES N Co Co 0 I 20.00 N N89046'47"E 47.02' 20.00 20.00 W0 25.52 N 104.00' m Q W w ih IOO �Q o o LOT 14 00 ^ J I I Q z o 940 SQUARE FEET o Z N w D� I Cl)N 0.0216 ACRES 0 j I 0 w U N89046'47"E 47.02' Iw m I U Q ti =o I D� - _� LOT 15 = w H U I a a I _ 1,048 SQUARE FEET 0 m Q J 0.0241 ACRES N56°29'15"W L{' N O U- U i z R=49002'21" a a CA = � 7.39 L=6.27' ~ m LOT 21 N89046'47"E 40.87' Chd=N44°42'58"E Q I I J ~ 0 CV 0.34' 5.65' Q /y� w >� � >� w O N: 1708051.74; E: 3120276.06 WHEAT RIDGE CITY DATUM Lu j ' N: 708482.61; E: 121063.18 0 0 It D MPLAVV � DD / 1 REC. NO. 2018003341 oo ( ) Co ZONED. - R3 N89039'59"E 308.89' 239.13' TRACT B N00°20'51 "W 14.26' p0//VT OF N89039'53"E 94.13' N89039'09"E 100.27' 7.74' I BEG//V/V//VG 1 A=90007'39" R=3.00' TRACT C L=4.72' 20,999 SQUARE FEET Chd=S45°17'02"E 0.4821 ACRES 4.25' N89046'47"E 3.98' N89039'08"E 92.98' 0 O rn EXISTING PARCEL LINE HEREBY REMOVED BY THIS PLAT TRACT E 8,740 SQUARE FEET 00 0.2006 ACRES z o N 0 0 z z TRACT 88 SQUARE F 0.0778 ACRES 26.05' 28.97' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 11.30' F__ � S89039'08"W 6.42' rn rn � � o � Lu � w w w o U_w �w �w O�w r C) HQQ `n ��¢ `n H�Q ' r�Q r OWN N 00- N 0�� °' ~�� °V ~ B N JCO C)-1JCoO oo JuO 0�C 0 Co O Z Co O Z Co O Z M O Z FE 26.07' 224.42' 20.00' 20.00' Lu LU� 28.05' Lu 0 Lo � w Q I C'1 o 00 � S89039'09"W w I M a O I ' I CIOo S89039'08"W `� �� I ' 5.63' o0 5.45' 00 � o 5.47' I 1 Lu zLCo 4.78' 0 0 w 0 LI? U� Mev 0 Lu w� �wv Z w U �L Lu NU- uj � C �Ow� o Ln m �¢¢ N `-n HQ¢ N - HQ¢ C, H?¢ Co 0c N NN 0�� N 0a- O N O0Co � ct)O J m _j co O JCoo Joao o �o P O CD z C)qcj- z C) qcj- Noow N CV � N � ° NO m ° m ° 0.0316 ACRES� 0 3,3 N 0 O L=4.71' m o m O z z N z Co Z 7.37 20.45 Co 20.00 0 20.00 22.55 A=90007'39" R=3.00' TRACT C L=4.72' 20,999 SQUARE FEET Chd=S45°17'02"E 0.4821 ACRES 4.25' N89046'47"E 3.98' N89039'08"E 92.98' 0 O rn EXISTING PARCEL LINE HEREBY REMOVED BY THIS PLAT TRACT E 8,740 SQUARE FEET 00 0.2006 ACRES z o N 0 0 z z TRACT 88 SQUARE F 0.0778 ACRES 26.05' 28.97' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 11.30' F__ � S89039'08"W 6.42' rn rn � � o � Lu � w w w o U_w �w �w O�w r C) HQQ `n ��¢ `n H�Q ' r�Q r OWN N 00- N 0�� °' ~�� °V ~ B N JCO C)-1JCoO oo JuO 0�C 0 Co O Z Co O Z Co O Z M O Z FE Lu TRACT D N89°39'08"E 92.98' 1.49' � I I N: 707021.66 224.42' I E: 119755.20 1 I I I' I I ' 1 � I I 1 ' Lu LU� o I Lu i � w Q I C'1 o I 1 CD Co CO O O o w I M a O I ' I CIOo 00 �� I ' �w 5.45' w T I � o I 1 cli O 0 zLCo 4.78' 0 0 I 0 m 0 0 o Z Lu NU- uj Co It w Co to ww Co U_ Ow wa) Co O 0? o i aj U' , A=89052'21" Ln 04 ui LOT 27 m HJ I; ? Q o �o ' I 1,377 SQUARE FE ET? R=3.00' Noow N N 0VO N ° NO ° O o ° 0.0316 ACRES� N � d O O L=4.71' m o m Co�o O m N z Co Z Co Co Chd=N44°52'21 "E 0 N z I 1 0 0 4.24'LL 22.55' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' ' 2 Lu TRACT D N89°39'08"E 92.98' 1.49' � I I N: 707021.66 224.42' I E: 119755.20 1 I I I' I I ' 1 � I I 1 ' Lu LU� o I Lu i � w Q I C'1 o I 1 CD Co CO O O o w I M a O I ' I CIOo 00 �� I ' �w 5.45' w T I � o Lu TRACT D N89°39'08"E 92.98' 1.49' � I I N89039'08"E 224.42' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' o 20.00' � w z No rn oLo � I CIOo 00 w0 ' � o I 1 cli O 0 zLCo 4.78' 0 0 I 0 m 0 0 o Z Lu NU- uj Co It w Co to ww Co U_ Ow wa) Co O 0? o i aj U' , A=89052'21" Ln 04 ui LOT 27 m HJ I; ? Q o �o ' I 1,377 SQUARE FE ET? R=3.00' Noow N N 0VO N ° NO ° O o ° 0.0316 ACRES� N � d O C/) O ozJ O L=4.71' o�o zJ o zJ Co�o O zo z Co Z Co Co Chd=N44°52'21 "E N = cch• I 1 0 0 4.24'LL Z ' N89039'08"E 7.44' 135.44' 1 20.00' 1 20.00' 0 N 20.00' (0/ � 1.51 7.36 22.55 20.00 20.00 20.00 20.00 25.52 N I �i CD N N o N I Q cN w U �� Iw Lu = w H ' I O I csD U- w U- U i CO, CV r00 � U CA � LOT 21 I I M I O Q O N ° ~ 0 CV >� w >� /y� w >� /� w Luu- >� w O 1,270 SQUARE FEET J w ' ' �' z J Co o > N L.L W r L > W LL W r L v > � V/ W r Lu v > N W Nov 0.0292 ACRES Q= I O N ~ O O0c� N ~< O 00N N ~ O OWN N ~ O OCYo N W~ ' I ^ W W_ N89°52'37"E z J m o z J m o O z J m o o z J° o O z Co o 4.81' °' °' °' Lo o ' I C o Lo Co 1 Co 0 o 0 CIO o Z° �� O I Ii WO m z 27.43' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 11.31' N C) C? TRACT F 1,698 SQUARE FEET ° N89 36 37 E 118.74 N89 36-37"E W Q o W 0.0390 ACRES N89036'37"E 118.77' 14.11' O p p I' o a Lu TRACT D N89°39'08"E 92.98' 1.49' � I I O 25.22' I 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' o 20.00' 13.55' z No rn oLo � I CIOo 00 � o I 1 cli O 0 zLCo 4.78' 0 0 I 0 m 0 o Z Lu NU- uj Co It w Co to ww Co U_ Ow wa) Co O 0? o Nw aj U' , ov Ln 04 ui LOT 27 m HJ I; ? Q ?N 1,377 SQUARE FE ET? Noow N N 0VO N ° NO ° O o ° 0.0316 ACRES� O C/) O ozJ O C/) o CD o�o zJ o zJ Co�o O zo z Co Co Co Co N 0 0 Z 7.44' 1 20.45' 1 20.00' 1 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 1 27.56' O az O I I= a o UJ �� to � I � o I 1 I � m 1 1 100 N I z O_ o U I , Lu 0 LL I; 0 ``' ( Q 0 N00020'52"W A=90°07'39" N89°39'08"E 135.45' 1 Co w N Q w N89°39'08"E 45.02' N89°46'47"E N a� 5.00 R=3.00 I I w (D 3.98 L=4.72' I = I m o A_89°52'21" Chd=S45°17'02"E O I ' w `) o TRACT G R-3.00' 4.25' N ' ' ' Z w = N 319 SQUARE FEET Chd=N44°42'58"E TRACT C N89039'47"E 0.0073 ACRES EXISTING PARCEL LINE 4.24 20,999 SQUARE FEET � I20.00' N89°39'08"E 44.99' 0.4821 ACRES N89039'08"E 224.47' HEREBY REMOVED BY THIS PLAT I I Q A=90°07'39" 7.38' 22.55' 20.00' 20.00' 20.45' 26.01' - 20.45' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 27.63' w 0.46' � TRACT I Z02 N89°46'47"E 44.15' LR -6 29' o 0 6N3 EChd=S45°17'02"E Co' � � "' TRACT H � � I 2,820 SQUARE FEET w w w o w o w o w o w i O �, 4.49 LOT 28 5.66 � � �'' � w New Mew N 3,311 SQUARE FEET N � � w L" Lei � w L" �O � w L" I� � w L" O U- I ' . 0.0647 ACRES rn O w rLu O � 957 SQUARE FEET o � M w ti M Lu ti M Lu t` M w �n 0.0760 ACRES ~ `` D L6 o � N Lr? O �U It �U �U It �U O O COMSU MSU CoMSU CoMSU CoMSU 0.0220 ACRES m o ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ N N Q ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ Q ¢ I Q L6 C)O OCoN 0CoN N 0CoN N OCoN O O OWN N Oc'1Cq N OC'1C. N 0aN N OCnM U C'7 �j O N CoO CoO O z O Lo Cn O Lo Cn O Ln Cn O Lo O r L� ° z JN �o J J JN z Jti J J J JL � N894647E 47.02 CO� o Lo o Lo o o� o� oN Lo Lo Lo oN �� O w J 55.35' ih c� N N N o o o o - � 1 C) 0�, M o o N89°39'09"E z z z S89°39'09"W N89°39'08"E z z z z i I o Lu w z 7 - LOT 29 `' o z 6.45' 4.75' o N 5.52' C:) w>- "' 1,434 SQUARE FEET z N r__ � N N r ' I Z = 00 0 0.0329 ACRES o o o Z z 29.00' 20.00' 20.00' 25.20' z Z 25.97' 20.00' 20.00' 20.00' 9.30' 1 ' O o N89046'47"E 22.00' I � 1.98' O N89037'49"E 94.20' N89039'09"E 95.27' N00020'43"W ' N:706757.05 20.00' 26.50' 47.02' z 5.36' TRACT H 235.24' TRACT H 7.41' 18.22' I N:706755.27 p 'R E:119756.28 � E:119453.83 UHIPL 'rVEO S89°39'47"W 328.96' UH1PLA r rE10 o ,, S 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 23 (REC. NO. F1001145) (REC. NO. 05930068) N �`` SE CORNER OF SECTION 23 T.3S. R.69W. OF THE 6TH P.M. T.3S., R.69W., OF THE 6TH P.M. ZO/UED. R3 ZO/UED. R3 rn SSS\� i (FOUND 3 1/4" BRASS CAP L.S. (FOUND 3 1/4" BRASS CAP L.S. CD �32�`` NO. 13212 IN RANGE BOX.) WHEAT RIDGE POINT #15809 NO. 13212 IN RANGE BOX.) I �. LAT: 39046'09.7639" N LAT 39°4609 72WHEAT RIDGE 05" N #15709 0 76�>> I LONG: 105°04'19.4871" W LONG: 105004'53.2076" W CC ; STATE PLANE COORDINATES STATE PLANE COORDINATES N: 1705409.82; E: 31120289.73 N: 1705393.28; E: 3117656.79 WEST 38TH AVENUE WHEAT RIDGE CITY DATUM WHEAT RIDGE CITY DATUM (PUBLIC VARIES) 1316.83' N: 705840.03; E: 121076.85 N: 705823.48; E: 118443.25 A - - - - - - - - 1316.83' - - - R.O.W.. - - - - - - - - - - - - S89038'24"E 2633.65' SOUTH LINE OF THE SE 1/4 OF SECTION 23, T.3S. ,R.69W., OF THE 6TH P.M. PROPOSED LOT LAYOUT I SHEET 2 OF 3 2 12 • 41 6 20 -• LEGEND Scale: 1 " = 20' PLAT BOUNDARY LINE ADJACENT R.O.W./LOT/PARCEL LINES CENTER LINE LOT LINE HEREBY CREATED BY THIS PLAT - - - - EXISTING DENVER WATER EASEMENT LINE ----------- EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LINE R.O.W. RIGHT-OF-WAY • SET 3/4"x30" PIN & 2" ALUMINUM CAP L.S. NO. 33202 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED LINE TABLE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT C U RVE DATA TAB L E DENVER WATER EASEMENT L//I/EBEAR//I/G COURSE DELTA' RADIUS LENGT Chd BEARING Chd LENGTH C1 90007'39" 40.00' 62.92' S45017'02"E 56.63' C2 89052'21" 40.00' 62.74' S44 42 58' W 56.51' C3 66 10 36 10.00 11.55 N32 52 06 E 10.92 C4 8045'16" 10.00' 1.53' N04035'51 "W 1.53' LINE TABLE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LINE TABLE DENVER WATER EASEMENT L//I/EBEAR//I/G D/STANCE L1 S89039'08"W 14.86' L2 N00020'52"W 8.50' L3 S89039'08"W 113.00' L4 S00013'1 YE 6.03' L5 S89046'47"W 5.98' L6 N00013'09"W 36.02' L7 N89039'08"E 123.89' L8 S00013'1 YE 74.00' L9 S89039'08"W 124.07' L10 N00013'09"W 30.00' L11 N89039'08"E 118.02' L12 N00020'52"W 8.50' L13 N89039'08"E 10.00' L14 S00020'52"E 7.66' L15 N00013'13"W 74.00' LINE TABLE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT L//I/E BEAR//I/G D/STANCE L16 N00013'13"W 179.50' L17 S89039'08"W 49.00' L18 N00013'09"W 25.00' L19 N89039'08"E 49.00' L20 N 00013' 13"W 50.50' L21 N89039'08"E 22.00' L22 S00013'13"E 50.00' L23 N89039'08"E 231.40' L24 S00014'00"E 25.00' L25 S89039'06"W 231.41' L26 S00013'13"E 105.00' L27 N89039'08"E 231.44' L28 S00014'00"E 25.00' L29 S89039'08"W 231.44' L30 S00013'13"E 50.00' L31 S89039'08"W 22.00' RID TOP VILLAGE SUBDIVISION FILING NO. 1 SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 20.0' 1 20.0' 40.00' I o I i N89 3 47n E 20.00 20.00' F -w Q0 0 N O Co0 O ii TRACT I L I I I I I I I I N89°39'08"E 7.47' IJ JI I I I I I I I I � I I � � I I rn oQ 0 oa M U) m- 0 w = C:) �� C:) Lu m 2 DETAIL "B" DRAINAGE EASEMENT SCALE:1 "=20' ry ao N Lo Lo LOT 1 LOT 2 r I I o I I I I I I I I I N89°39'08"E 7.47' IJ JI I I I I I I I I � I I � � I I UMPLAVVED (REC. NO. 2018003341) ZONED. - R3 N89039'59"E 308.89' D J 0 J h 0 r Irl r 0 0 0 0 0 _ RACT B J J J J J 0 L19 I L__ ll-------� ---- ------------------------------------------- ----- ----� �_-I-------------- � .-----------�---- _ L23 ' TRACT A L7 � • TRACT C DRAINAGE EASEMENT o I� \C� EXISTING 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (SEE DETAIL "A") I J (J EXISTING 30' DENVER WATER EASEMENT TO REMAIN I m I TO REMAIN o (REC. NO. ) I (REC. NO. L25 L L17 -.. -..-.. I.-..- L3 - I -..-..- -..-.. -..- I - -, L5 J 1 1 rry TRACT D I I L1 c) O LOT 21 I I H o LOT 12 1 i O O 0 r r r N EXISTING 30' DENVER WATER EASEMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ Ei II TO REMAIN OJ OJ OJ OJ I J I (REC. NO. ) W = LOT 13 _� i 1 i� m I ° I Co i Lo. TRACT F `o I J 1 TRACT E J I I LOT 14 I I I I I I I I I 1► - I EXISTING 22' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT II TO REMAIN N M O LOT 15 i 1 (REC. NO. ) I I N N N N N LOT 27 I 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 1 L13 1 Nr I I �.. TRACT D i I � __ IL------------------------------------------------.=----------------------------------------------- - '------------------- 1 o DRAINAGE EASEMENTrt2 o' I(SEE DETAIL B ) JI I EXISTING 30 DENVER WATER EASEMENT 00 N TRACT G I TO REMAIN O/ EXISTING 22 SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT N (REC. NO. ) TO REMAIN I 1 0 TRACT C (REC. NO. ) - 1 L9 - - --- ----- ------ --------------------------- I I LOT 28 I 1 TRACT H h M M M M M M M M M of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _jI J J J J J J J J J LOT 29 L----L31----J UMPLAVVED S89039'47"W 328.9611 UMPLA MD (REC. NO. F1001145) I (REC. NO. 05930068) ZONED. - R3 ZONED. - R3 I 2 Co �w Lu H �U- u-0 o� Z Lu U) = m I- !__� LL Ci ON N z w0 wU �� 00 w� z� J w Cf) Lu w= Q �Zo N QC:) QLu o az C� U Dw o U) LOT 11 S00°14'00"E 2.37' N89°46'04"E 7.47' Cf)Im Cl?Cf) N N co 0 U -)I o r r O O z I (n S89°46'04"W 7.4 LOT 21 DETAIL "A" DRAINAGE EASEMENT SCALE:1 "=20' LOT 27 S00°14'00"E 0.54' N89°39'08"E 7.47' C)f 0 0 I 0 u') U) N L Co o C) Cf) 0 0 zl S89°39'08"W 7.47' LOT 38 DETAIL "B" DRAINAGE EASEMENT SCALE:1 "=20' EASEMENT LAYOUT SHEET 3 OF 3 EXHIBIT 11: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES Meeting Date: Attending Staff: Location of Meeting: Property Address: Property Owner(s): Property Owner(s) Present? Applicant: Applicant Present? Existing Zoning: Existing Comp. Plan: January 16, 2018 Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager Zack Wallace Mendez, Planner II Wheat Ridge Municipal Center, Police Training Room 4000-4066 Upham Street Nodef Colorado Inc. No Tony Del Grippo and Neil Shea Yes Residential -Three (R-3) Neighborhood Existing Site Conditions: The subject properties are located on the east side of Upham Street between W. 38'' Avenue and W. 441' Avenue. There are a total of four lots, each containing a single family home. The lots are zoned Residential -Three (R-3). According the Jefferson County Assessor, the four lots are under single ownership and collectively total approximately 87,000 square feet or 2 acres in size. To the east are two JeffCo Public Schools: Stevens Elementary and Sobesky Academy. To the north is a 2.5 story apartment building built in 1960. Further north along Upham are a mix of single-family homes and duplexes. Across Upham Street to the west are three mid-century apartment complexes and a single family home; these properties, and properties to the south, are also zoned R-3. The 38"' Avenue corridor to the south is zoned for mixed-use development and West End 38, a four-story apartment building with a retail component, is expected to break ground soon between Upham and Vance Streets. Applicant Preliminary Proposal: The applicant would like to rezone and subdivide the property to develop townhomes. (The proposed site plan shows 44 units, though the applicant acknowledged this number will need to be reduced.) The existing four homes would be demolished. The proposed site plan gains access from Upham Street at a centered entrance, with homes facing Upham Street on either side. Interior homes are Planning Commission 33 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village shown to be oriented east -west. The central homes are proposed to face a large landscape area that is centered on the site to the entrance. Garages would be accessed through a network of internal alleys. Pedestrian access would be to the front of the homes, with a network of internal sidewalks. A detention area for drainage is proposed at the east of the site. The homes are proposed to be three stories with garage access on the first floor. Each building would contain 4-5 townhomes. The applicant noted the possibility of private patios or decks on the first or second floor which would face the landscaped areas. The homes would be on individual parcels and would be a for -sale product. The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting: • In addition to the applicant and staff, nine members of the public attended the meeting. • Staff discussed the site, its zoning and future land use. • The applicant and members of the public were informed of the process for a planned development zone change. • The members of the public were informed of their opportunity to make comments during the process and at the public hearing, if required. The following issues were discussed regarding the proposed development: • In general, attendees were interested in understanding why the zone change was desired, if there would be redevelopment, and what the applicant's long-term plans are for the property. Three attendees were supportive of the request. Two attendees were neutral. Some expressed distrust of the applicant's intentions, expressed concern that 44u' Avenue would become overdeveloped, and expressed concern regarding multi -story infill development that was occurring in East Wheat Ridge. • Will the units be for rent or for sale? The units will be for sale product. • How much will the units sell for? The applicant stated he believes they will be priced in the mid -400s, based on current market conditions. • Will there be visitor parking? Yes, the City requires visitor parking spaces be provided for project of this nature. • A neighbor expressed concern over the current condition of the property, code violations, and any involvement of the current owner in the redevelopment plans. The applicant stated the current owner would not be involved in the redevelopment. Staff added that Code Enforcement should be notified of any code violation concerns. • What are the proposed setbacks along Upham Street? Current standards, under the R-3 zoning require a 25 foot setback. The applicant stated they would likely propose a similar setback, as they would like to provide private front yard space for the units in lieu of the typical rooftop decks seen in recent developments in Denver. The units will not be pushed up to the sidewalk. • How tall will the units be? Planning Commission 34 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village Current standards, under the R-3 zoning allow up to 35 foot tall structures. Due to fire department requirements the applicant stated they will aim to keep the units at 30 feet. • Are there any plans for the City to widen Upham Street? The applicant will be required to dedicate a portion of their land to ensure Upham Street is adequately sized for today's street section standards. This, however, will not add any travel lanes to Upham. • What will the lighting be like on the property? Lighting will be placed to ensure safety, but is required to be downcast. The City Code requires that light not spill over property lines. • Are there any plans for fencing the property, especially along the south side adjacent to the single-family residential? There will likely be a 6 -foot tall solid wood fence there. • Timeline for the project? The applicant stated they are in the very early stages of development. Best case scenario the applicant would start construction in 2019, with construction being phased and lasting approximately 2 years. • Will this be a covenant controlled community? The property will be maintained by an HOA, yes. • Will any of these units be turned into rentals? Due to FHA loan requirements, the developer cannot sell to more than a certain number of investors (LLCs). However, they cannot guarantee people will not rent them out, so it is likely a few units will be turned into rentals after they are sold. Aside from the neighbors at the meeting, staff received no comment from others in the area regarding the proposal in association with the neighborhood meeting. Planning Commission 35 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village EXHIBIT 12: PUBLIC COMMENT see attached Planning Commission 36 Case Nos. WZ-18-17, WZ-18-18, WS -18-02 /Ridgetop Village Current Property Management - 16948 S Golden Rd Unit F Golden, CO 80401 January 17, 2019 Re: Upcoming Wheat Ridge Planning Commission Bearing for RidgeTop Village Town Homes on February 7, 2019 To Whom It May Concern: As the owner of 3955 Upham St, Current Property Management is in support of the RidgeTop Village town home site for the proposed 38 town homes units. The owners of 4000, 4042, 4062, & 4066 Upham St, Upham Partners LLC, have shared with us their site plan and overall vision for the project. We offer our full support of the project, and believe their project will have a positive economic and esthetic impact on the immediate neighborhood and the Ridge at 381h business district. If we can be of any further assistance or answer any questions in regards to our opinion of the impact this project on Wheat fudge and the immediate neighborhood, please don't hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Current Property Management V �. Moore Family Trust — 7521 Terry Ct, Arvada, CO 80007 January 15, 2019 Re: Upcoming Wheat Ridge Planning Commission Hearing for RidgeTop Village Town Homes on February 7, 2019 To Whom It May Concern: As the owner of the 2 properties known as 3900 & 3920 Upham St, Moore Family Trust is in support of the RidgeTop Village town home site for the proposed 38 town homes units. The owners of 4000, 4042, 4062, & 4066 Upham St, Upham Partners LLC, have met with the Moore family and shared with us their site plan and overall vision for the project. We offer our full support of the project, and believe their project will have a positive economic and esthetic impact on the immediate neighborhood and the Ridge at 381h business district. If we can be of any further assistance or answer any questions in regards to our opinion of the impact this project on Wheat Ridge and the immediate neighborhood, please don't hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Moore Family Trust -gay-�35 9 Planning Commission, City of Wheat Ridge Wheat Ridge City Council. To whom it may concern. I am writing to enthusiastically support the Ridge Top Village Town Home project at about 4000 Upham St. I am planning on them being my new next-door neighbors. My name is Rob McLeod and my wife is Michelle McLeod, we own and reside at 3960 Upham St Our home has been in our family, through Michelle's mother and grandparents since the home was new, and her grandparents, Joe and Vera Pearson were newlyweds in 1934. Joe Pearson was even one the fire chiefs the Wheat Ridge Fire Dept, and his family was deeply involved in early Wheat Ridge history. He was one of Wheat Ridge's carnation growers the city even now celebrates. As a matter of fact, we still get the water bill in his name, my wife has never wanted to change it. My wife has fond memories of her child -hood here, and Upham Street was once a vibrant part of community. We've have seen Upham Street begin to stagnate, and perhaps even begin to become very ill, and I am excited that Neil Shea, Vision Acquisitions and others have conceived of a way to bring new life to Upham Street and the community around us. I know there will be the normal concerns of congestion, traffic, noise and the like, and I expect that. I believe these issues can, will be, and/or have been addressed. I am excited to see new life and projects happening in the neighborhood, with the Corners and West End 38, and now the Ridge Top Village Town Home project. I just want the City of Wheat Ridge to know that our family on Upham Street, is strongly supporting the Ridge Top Village Town home project and am looking forward to meeting many of our new neighbors. Sincerely Rob and Michelle McLeod rrr�... CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISION RESOLUTION NO. 01 Series of 2019 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A DESIGNATED PUBLIC PLACE FOR THE POSTING OF MEETING NOTICES AS REQUIRED BY THE COLORADO OPEN MEETINGS LAW WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, deems it in the public interest to provide full and timely notice of all of its meetings; and WHEREAS, the Colorado state legislature amended the Colorado Open Meetings Laws, Section 24-6-401, et seq., C.R.S. to require all "local public bodies" subject to the requirements of the law to annually designate at the local public body's first regular meeting of each calendar year, the place for posting notices of public hearings no less than twenty-four hours prior to the holding of the meeting; and WHEREAS, "local public body" is defined by Section 24-6-402(1)(a) to include "any board, committee, commission, authority, or other advisory, policy-making, rule-making, or formally constituted body of any political subdivision of the state and any public or private entity to which a political subdivision, or an official thereof, has delegated a governmental decision- making function but does not include persons on the administrative staff of the local public body". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, that: 1. The lobby of the Municipal Building and the City's website shall constitute the designated public place for the posting of meeting notices as required by the Colorado Open Meetings Law. 2. The Community Development Director or his designee shall be responsible for posting the required notices no later than twenty-four (24) hours prior to the holding of the meeting. 3. All meeting notices shall include specific agenda information, where possible. DONE AND RESOLVED THIS day of 2019. Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: Secretary to the Planning Commission