HomeMy WebLinkAbout04/04/19I
City of
WheatPdge
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
April 4, 2019
Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning
Commission on April 4, 2019 at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal
Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
*Agendapackets and minutes are available online athttp://www.ci.wheatridge.co.usl95/Plarming-
Commission
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be
recommended for placement on the agenda.)
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—March 21,2019
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the dme for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the
agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.)
7. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WS -18-06: An application filed by Toll Southwest, LLC for approval of a major subdivision
for a 200 -unit townhome development for property zoned Mixed Use -Commercial TOD (MU -C TOD)
and located at 5060 Ward Road.
B. Case Nos. WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26: An application filed by Ames Partners, LLC for approval of a
zone change from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) with approval
of an Outline Development Plan (ODP) and Specific Development Plan (SDP) for development of two
duplexes located at the northeast comer of W. 33" Avenue and Ames Street
C. Case No. WZ-18-23: An application filed by Regency Centers for approval of a Master Sign Plan for
Applewood Village Shopping Center on property zoned Planned Commercial Development (PCD) at
the northeast comer of the property located at 3210-3600 Youngfield Street
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
A. Planning Commission Dinner/Training April 18, 2019
10. ADJOURNMENT
Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat
Ridge. Call Sara Spaulding Public Information Officer at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of a
meeting if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance.
City of
i�9r
WheatMidge
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of Meeting
March21, 2019
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair OHM at 7:03 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29"' Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Commission Members Present: Melissa Antol
Daniel Larson
Janet Leo
Scott Ohm
Richard Peterson
Jahi Simbai
Vivian Vos
Commission Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: Ken Johnstone, Community Development Director
Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager
Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
It was moved by Commissioner PETERSON and seconded by Commissioner LEO
to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried 7-0.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — February 7, 2019
It was moved by Commissioner LEO and seconded by Commissioner LARSON to
approve the minutes of February 7, 2019, as written. Motion carried 5-0-2 with
Commissioners ANTOL and SIMBAI abstaining.
6. CITIZEN COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS (Public comments may be limited to 3
minutes)
Planning Commission Minutes 1 —
March 21, 2019
No one wished to speak at this time.
OLD BUSINESS
8. NEW BUSINESS
A. NRS ( Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy) Study Session
Ms. Mikulak gave a brief description of the NRS document and introductions of
the Staff, PC Commissioners and NRS Committee.
The NRS study session began with comments and perspectives on the process from
the three Co-chairs: Rachel Hultin, Kathleen Martell and Corey Stites.
Ms. Hultin explained the process of the Steering Committee and the importance of
the participation and engagement of the community. She also mentioned how
lucky they are to be working with the staff from czb consultants.
Ms. Martell talked about the 27 members of the steering committee and how they
are a good representation of the City and the demographics are very diverse. The
committee broke into groups and held meetings throughout the City with
businesses or in coffee shops to talk with members of the community. Ms. Martell
explained that after these meetings a survey was created and there was also an open
house to reach even more members of the Wheat Ridge Community.
Mr. Stites spoke about the community outreach and the different demographic
groups which included families, new residents, long-term residents, renters, seniors
and business owners. He commented on the survey, saying 1053 people
participated and there were 120 attendees at the December 2018 open house and
about 95 at the February open houses.
Ms. Hultin said the final phase of the process is now being entered into and it has
been nice to see all the involved citizens who have taken part of this process.
Eric Ameigh and Thomas Eddington, consultants with czb, then spoke about the
emerging NRS direction. They talked about the process update and the different
phases of the timeline which included some problem solving and talking with the
community through small meetings, the survey and open houses then convening
again with the steering committee to discuss the pulse of the community. They
found that overall Wheat Ridge is satisfied with how things are going and not
much change is needed; except for a couple of items. Mr. Ameigh explained there
is a desire for neighborhoods to self -manage change at the neighborhood level and
there is a desire for improved corridors around the City.
Planning Commission Minutes -2—
March
2—
March 21, 2019
In response to a question from Commissioner ANTOL, czb confirmed the strategy
will include the next steps and address resources need.
Mr. Johnstone added that the 2005 document served as a roadmap and the 2019
NRS document update will inform work programs for the Community
Development department for the next 5 to 10 years.
Commissioner VOS commended the steering committee, noting that the extent of
public participation is a testament to their hard work.
Mr. Ameigh and Mr. Eddington agreed and commended the level of commitment
of the steering committee is incredible and the effort the community has put forth
has been amazing. Mr. Ameigh noted that it's hard to replicate and sustain that
level of commitment and engagement.
Commissioner VOS noted it would be good to keep the Steering Committee
involved in some way after the adoption of the NRS document.
Mr. Eddington addressed a question from Commissioner VOS and defined a node
as a center of activity, usually a cluster of activity, and explained that usually a
cluster of activity can be retail or restaurants.
In response to a question from Commissioner PETERSON, there was discussion
on how to manage the outside influence of the metro area. Both Mr. Eddington
and Mr. Ameigh explained it would be difficult to isolate the City of Wheat Ridge
but the City's vision can be preserved with the right tools.
Mr. Johnstone and Ms. Mikulak added the City of Wheat Ridge has identified itself
as a quirky City. There was discussion of managing density, character, and
quirkiness within the realities of the regional market. There was discussion of how
demographics affect the types of businesses that the community wants to see.
Managing change and growth is different in every community and the values of
that community need to be defined.
In response to a question from Commissioner LARSON, about what has been
accomplished since 2005; Mr. Johnstone listed a variety of accomplishments,
including adoption of a new Comprehensive Plan in 2009, adoption of several
subarea plans, work on Wadsworth Boulevard and 38a' Avenue, and many zoning
code amendments. Ms. Mikulak added that there were 10 strategies that were
discrete action items with focus on strengthening both residential and commercial
markets.
Commissioner PETERSON observed that people sometimes get defensive in the
face of change and asked if there will be an education component to this document
and an education on what is about to happen.
Planning Commission Minutes -3—
March
3—
March 21, 2019
Ms. Hultin explained the average citizen is not aware how the processes move
through the City, but there are others who are the stewards of our heritage and thi,,
document is not just the what, but the how and that will elevate civic engagement.
Ms. Martell added that people are aware change is coming and they are excited
about creating neighborhood identity and a feel of agency in their own
neighborhoods.
Mr. Ameigh said there are some people who are naive in the community and some
who are change agents so it is hard to generalize.
Ms. Hultin added there are communication infrastructure issues in the City of
Wheat Ridge, for example not everyone gets the same utility bill and we need to
get a communication channel in place.
Commissioner LEO thanked the hard work of the Steering Committee and said she
has been impressed with the change that has happened in the City of Wheat Ridge.
She knows that people can be afraid of change. Commissioner LEO mentioned
that people may want growth, but they want to go home to their street and still fell
the same because the neighborhoods have distinct characteristics; she is not
surprised by what she read that people are generally happy with the City.
Commissioner PETERSON asked about rental housing and renter's rights and
believes more should be done to support short- and long-term renters. He also
mentioned the City should look at Code Enforcement also.
Ms. Mikulak acknowledged that the public input has been different from what staff
and czb expected, particularly related to rentals and code enforcement.
B. Election of Officers
Commissioner OHM was elected Chair and Commissioner LARSON was elected
Vice Chair.
9. OLD BUSINESS
10. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner VOS and seconded by Commissioner LEO to
adjourn the meeting at 9:18 p.m. Motion carried 7-0.
Scott Ohm, Chair Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes
March 21, 2019
4—
♦��4'
City of
"� �7�Theat�idge
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO:
Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: Lauren Mikulak
DATE OF MEETING:
April 4, 2019
CASE NO. & NAME:
WS -18-06 / The Ridge at Ward Station
ACTION REQUESTED:
Request for approval of a major subdivision for a 200 -unit townhome
development on property zoned Mixed Use -Commercial Transit Oriented
Development (MU -C TOD)
LOCATION OF REQUEST:
5060 Ward Road
APPLICANT(S):
Toll Southwest, LLC
PROPERTY OWNER(S):
Applicant is under contract; current owneris lBC Denver, II, LLC
APPROXIMATE AREA:
593,903 Square Feet (13.6 Acres)
PRESENT ZONING:
Mixed Use -Commercial Transit Oriented Development (MU -C TOD)
PRESENT LAND USE:
Vacant land
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE & SUBDIVISION RUGS (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
LOCATION MAP
Planning Commission
Case No. WS -18-061 The IMge of WP d Station
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case.
I. REQUEST
The applicant is requesting approval of a major subdivision that includes right-of-way dedication and
creates 201 lots and 50 tracts. The property is zoned Mixed Use -Commercial Transit Oriented
Development (MU -C TOD). It is located at 5060 Ward Road at the southeast corner of Ward and
W. 52nd Avenue and is the location of the former Jolly Rancher factory. The purpose of the request is
to prepare the site for a 200 -unit townhome development.
Because of the dedication of new public streets and based on the number of lots being created, the plat
is processed as a major subdivision. hi this case, Planning Commission will make a recommendation to
City Council, which is the final authority for approval of a major subdivision.
The property is the subject of several related land use applications and agreements that are not under
consideration by the Planning Commission. These include the following:
• Concept Plan—A concept plan is required in a mixed use zone district for any phased
development or for any projects over 10 acres in size. The neighborhood meeting required for
the concept plan was held in April 2018. A concept plan for development is being reviewed.
All concept plans in mixed use zone districts are reviewed administratively.
• Site Plan Each building or phase of development in a mixed use zone district requires site
plan review to confirm compliance with the City's adopted zoning and design codes. Staff is
reviewing site plans for the town home portion of the development. All site plans in mixed use
zone districts are reviewed administratively.
• Metro District Service Plan—A metropolitan district and associated service plan were approved
for the property in 2012. Because of changes in the land use concepts and financial analysis, an
updated service plan will be presented to City Council.
While these applications are related, they are not part of the platting request and should not influence
the Planning Commission's recommendation on the subdivision.
The purpose of a subdivision plat is not to review specific site plan details, but rather to confirm
property boundaries, access, rights-of-way, easements, and utility service in order to create
developable parcels.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject property is located in the far northwest corner of the City, immediately northwest of
RTD's Wheat Ridge - Ward commuter rail station. The site is L shaped and is bounded by Ward Road
on the west, W. 52nd Avenue on the north, and Ridge Road on the south (Exhi�. The entire
site is currently vacant and consists of several parcels, totaling approximately 13.6 acres.
The property is zoned Mixed Use -Commercial Transit Oriented Development (MU -C TOD), a zone
district which is intended for areas within one-half mile of light rail and commuter rail stations. The
MU -C TOD zone district follows the MU -C framework but is specifically designed to allow densities
that support transit ridership and to encourage land uses and building form that enhance connections to
transit. The site was rezoned from Planned Industrial Development (PID) and Light Industrial (1) to
MU -C TOD by City Council in July 2012.
Planning Commission
Case No. WS-18-06/The Ridge at Ward Station
The properties in the area include a variety of zoning designations and land uses �oning).
A Conoco gas station is located at the corner of Ward Road and W. 52°d Avenue and a variety of light
industrial uses are adjacent to the northeast and south. These are zoned PID and Industrial -
Employment (I -E) and include manufacturing uses, RV storage, boat storage, a landscape contractor,
CrossFit, and auto repair among others. To the east is RTD's surface parking lot and beyond that are
residential uses.
The nearby residential uses include the Hance Ranch townhome project at 52°d between Taft and
Tabor Streets which is zoned MU -N and expected to be under construction this spring. The property at
Ridge between Taft and Tabor Streets is zoned MU -C TOD and is being explored for an apartment
use. Beyond these to the west the land uses transition to lower -density residential uses. Ward Road and
W. 52°d Avenue represent the City's boundary and across these streets are properties within
unincorporated Jefferson County and the City of Arvada �.
The site is currently owned by a single landowner and is comprised of several unplatted parcels. The
applicant, Toll Southwest LLC (dba Toll Brothers), is under contract to purchase the property. The site
was the former location of the Jolly Rancher factory. The business closed at this location in 2002 when
it was purchased by Hershey Foods. The buildings were demolished over time between 2004 and 2012.
The site has been unused and vacant since the closure and demolition.
The station area in general is identified in the City's comprehensive plan, Envision Wheat Ridge, as a
high priority redevelopment area. The subject property is the largest parcel under single ownership and
is widely recognized as an underutilized and potentially catalytic development site. If the subdivision
is approved, the applicant intends to develop 200 townhomes in four (4) phases. The applicant is
serving as the master developer and will be responsible for public improvements in and around the
property.
III. PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAT
The proposed subdivision plat is comprised of eight (8) sheets and is
organized as follows:
• The cover sheet includes the legal description and signature blocks.
• Sheets 2 and 3 includes standards notes and declarations as well as tract and lot summary
tables.
• Sheet 4 depicts the existing conditions and is used to remove the existing parcel lines.
• Sheet 5 depicts the proposed conditions for the overall site and dedicates new public streets
within the site and additional right-of-way around the perimeter.
• For readability, the proposed subdivision design is shown at a larger scale on Sheets 6, 7 and 8
which depict bearings and details for all lots, tracts, and easements.
Important features of the plat are further described below.
Perimeter Right -of -Way (ROW)
When new properties are created through the subdivision process, staff reviews adjacent street
improvements to confirm that they meet current roadway design standards. Street and sidewalk widths
are inadequate on 52°d Avenue, Ward Road, and Ridge Road, so additional right-of-way is proposed to
be dedicated along the entire perimeter of the site. The widths of these perimeter ROW dedications are
Planning Commission
Case No. WS-18-06/The Ridge at Ward Station
sized to accommodate detached sidewalks and tree lawns. Ridge Road would also accommodate on -
street parking.
Interior Circulation and Right -of -Way
The subdivision plat includes dedication of three new public streets W. 51' Avenue, Vivian Street,
and Union Street the designs and alignment for which further the City's vision for a walkable station
area.
The station area has long been dominated by industrial land uses. The arrival of the RTD commuter
rail and Wheat Ridge - Ward Station have resulted in several planning efforts that call for a broad mix
of uses and a more complete and walkable street grid. hi addition, the mixed use zoning has block
length standards that identify 1600 to 1800 linear feet as the preferred block size perimeter. This
dimensional standard is scaled to the pedestrian and based on comfortable walking distance.
The proposed street design and block sizes shown on the plat were largely dictated by the limited depth
of the site and the established sizes of townhomes and alleys. All three complete blocks created by this
plat are well within zoning standards:
• Northwest block perimeter (bounded by 52°d, Ward, 51' and Vivian) = 1502 feet
• Southwest block perimeter (bounded by 51st, Ward, Ridge, and Vivian) = 1048 feet
• Southeast block perimeter (bounded by 51st, Vivian, Ridge, and Union) = 1377 feet
The curvilinear design of the street grid meets the City's desire for connectivity and provides a more
residential character for this new neighborhood. The new streets within the site (51st Avenue and
Vivian Street) would have detached sidewalk and on -street parking. Union Street, on the east side of
the property, is dedicated but will dead-end unless and until additional properties develop further to the
north.
The alignment of 51st Avenue at Ward is subject to CDOT approval because Ward Road is a state
highway. The applicant is working with CDOT to obtain the appropriate access permits. CDOT will
require that athird lane be constructed on Ward to serve as an acceleration and deceleration lane. This
access point will not be signalized and will be limited to a three-quarters movement that prohibits a left
turn movement out of the site.
The location of Vivian Street at 52°d Avenue has been designed to align with the existing Vivian Street
to the north. The location of Vivian Street at Ridge is roughly mid -block; there are no existing streets
with which to align.
The total area of ROW dedication including interior and perimeter dedications is 3.5 acres in size.
The development is proposed to be served by a series of private alleys. These will not be dedicated as
public right-of-way and are shown as tracts.
Lot Configuration
As noted above, the street layout considered the typical dimensions of the townhomes and alleys, and
the resulting lot configuration results in a logical layout. All existing parcel lines are proposed to be
vacated (shown on Sheet 3), and a total of 201 development lots are proposed to be created. Two
hundred (200) are sized appropriately for proposed townhomes. The largest lot created by the plat
(Block 16, Lot 1) is located at the southeast corner and is sized for commercial or mixed use
development.
Planning Commission
Case No. WS-18-06/The Ridge at Ward Station
The MU -C TOD zone district does not include minimum lot size and lot width requirements, but the
proposed lots appear to be shaped and sized appropriately to accommodate future development.
Tract Configuration and Easements
A series of 50 tracts includes all of the areas within the site that are not otherwise part of the ROW
dedication or within the development lots. These tracts include all common areas, utilities, drainage
features, alleys, and open space amenities.
Tract U and W are among the largest and are designed to accommodate a privately maintained,
publicly accessible pocket park and linear park/paseo. These are consistent with the City's 2015
Northwest Subarea Plan, which calls for a park within the station area, and with the 2016 Vision Plan
that calls for recreational infrastructure including a linear park.
Because Wheat Ridge is not a full service city, the applicant has been working with the appropriate
service providers for wet and dry utility designs. Adequate capacity exists to serve the development.
As is customary with a townhome development, easements traverse the site and are often located
within alleys.
Drainage
Because of the large size of the property, the existing topography, and the historic flows across the site,
the project includes two separate drainage facilities. Six tracts are identified as having a drainage
purpose. Two underground detention chambers are proposed for water quality and detention and will
be located within Tract U (below the linear park/paseo) and in Tract E (below the alley). The other
tracts include lesser components of the system. All stormwater will be conveyed into the existing storm
sewer within Ridge Road and be conveyed to the regional detention pond to the east at Ridge Road and
Robb Street.
A final drainage report and plan along with civil construction documents are under review and will be
finalized with the completion of the site plan application and prior to issuance of any permits. The plat
includes appropriate easements for the drainage system, notably on Sheet 2 in Note 8.
Parkland Dedication
The subdivision regulations include a parkland dedication requirement for all residential subdivisions
based on the assumption that additional residents in the City will impact the demand for parks and
open space. When land is not dedicated for a public park, a fee is required in lieu. Developments in
TOD areas are subject to a reduced fee of $2,021.62 per unit.
Some of the area of the pocket park and linear park must fulfill minimum open space requirements in
the zoning code, but the balance may count toward the parkland dedication requirement. This balance
is not expected to fulfill all of the parkland dedication requirement, so a fee will also be owed. These
calculations will be determined based on the final site design, and the fee owed will be included in the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement. A condition of approval is included to this effect.
Development Covenant and Subdivision Improvement Agreement
The applicant is responsible for installing all public improvements, including the drainage system, the
streetscape improvements, the new streets, utilities and the open space. These obligations will
ultimately be memorialized in a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) between the City and
Planning Commission
Case No. WS-18-06/The Ridge at Ward Station
developer. The SIA dictates construction and maintenance responsibilities as well as the timing of
permit issuance relative to the completion of public improvements. Because the metropolitan district is
expected to have a role in the funding, construction, and/or maintenance of some of these elements and
because the metro district service plan requires an update, a Development Covenant will be used in
addition to an SIA. A condition of approval is included to this effect.
The Development Covenant obligates the developer to complete the improvements, but does not
include the same specificity as the SIA. The covenant is recorded with the plat and will allow the
developer to close on the property, take control of the metro district, and update the metro district
service plan. Shortly thereafter, the SIA will be completed with the metro district as a party to the
agreement. This sequencing of agreements is permitted by the subdivision regulations and is common
for larger developments.
V. AGENCY REFERRALS
All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the subdivision plat and regarding the
ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to
accommodate future development, and the applicant is in direct contact with the appropriate utility
agencies. Specific referral responses follow; agencies are notified that no comment shall be presumed
to mean no concerns.
Wheat Ridge Public Works: The subdivision plat has been reviewed and approved.
Renewal Wheat Ridge: Finds no conflict with urban renewal plans.
Wheat Ridge Police: No comments
Arvada Fire: Can serve.
Arvada Planning & Traffic: Minor comments on site design; the Cities of Wheat Ridge and
Arvada continue to coordinate on infrastructure improvements in the station area pursuant to a
Memorandum of Understanding and Intergovernmental Agreement.
Colorado Department of Transportation: Access on Ward Road will require access permits,
and the applicant has applied for these permits.
Century Link: No comment. Utility coordination is ongoing.
Comcast Cable: No comment. Utility coordination is ongoing.
Fruitdale Sanitation: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing.
Jefferson County Planning: No comments
Prospect Park Rec District: No comments
RTD: No comments
Planning Commission
Case No. WS-18-06/The Ridge at Ward Station
Valley Water: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing.
Xcel Energy: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing.
VI. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff concludes that the proposed major subdivision plat complies with the MU -C TOD zone district
regulations and results in a logical lot layout for future development. Staff concludes that the
subdivision plat complies with the standards in Article IV (subdivision regulations) of the zoning and
development code and that all utility agencies can serve the property with improvements installed at
the developer's expense. For these reasons, Staff recommends approval of the plat with the conditions
listed below.
VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS
Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WS -18-06, a request for approval of a
major subdivision plat on property zoned Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) and located at the 5060
Ward Road, for the following reasons:
1. All requirements of the subdivision regulations (Article IV) of the zoning and development
code have been met.
2. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the
developer's expense.
With the following conditions:
1. The applicant shall enter into a development covenant prior to recordation of the
subdivision plat and subsequently into a subdivision improvement agreement.
2. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall enter into a subdivision
improvement agreement and shall provide homeowner's association covenants for review
and approval by staff.
3. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay the required fees -in -lieu of
parkland dedication.
Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WS -18-06, a request for approval of a major
subdivision plat on property zoned Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) and located at the 5060 Ward
Road, for the following reasons:
Planning Commission
Case No. WS-18-06/The Ridge at Ward Station
K
- - W52ND AVE 7 -�
~ N t a
pp
i
Ia JIMno
i
- _RIDGE RD
✓'rte "' �` � ��� I '""Y
1
J
�
T
,
W52ND AVE
MU -N
PID
N
a
�
a
3
MU -C TOD
I
-E
RIDGE RD
C-2
PID
EXHIBIT 3: PROPOSED PLAT
[attached]
Planning Commission 10
Case No. WS-18-06/The Ridge at Ward Station
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET 1 OF 8
OWNERS CERTEICATE:
WE, TOLL SOUTHWEST, LLC., BEING THE OWNER(S) OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 13.6341 ACRES DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
'G'.
THE SOUTH 17 FEET OF THE WEST 251 FEET OF LOT 13, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
AND THE WEST 518.12 FEET OF LOT 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 25 FEET THEREOF,
EXCEPT ANY PORTION THEREOF FALLING WITHIN WARD ROAD,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO.
PARCEL B:
THAT PORTION OF LOT 13,
STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 13, STANDLEY HEIGHTS, FROM WHICH THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13 BEARS
SOUTH 89°11.9'WEST A DISTANCE OF 251.02 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89°11.9'EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13, A DISTANCE OF 257.10 FEET TO A POINT 537.97 FEET EAST OF
THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN;
THENCE NORTH 0°04.2'WEST PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 17, A DISTANCE OF 17.0 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 89°11.9'WEST A DISTANCE OF 257.10 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0004.2'EAST A DISTANCE OF 17.0 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
PARCEL C-
A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN LOT 17,
TYPE AREA
STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
THENCE NORTH
A SUBDIVISION RECORDED IN THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY,
COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 17;
50TH PLACE AS
THENCE NORTH 0004.2'WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE
OF 25.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF WEST
50TH PLACE AS CONVEYED TO JEFFERSON COUNTY BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED IN BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409 OF SAID OFFICIAL
RECORDS;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHOSE CENTRAL
THENCE NORTH 88059.0'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE
AS RECORDED IN SAID BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409 A
DISTANCE OF 750.12 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
88259.0'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED
THENCE NORTH 88°59.0'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE
AS RECORDED IN BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409 A
DISTANCE OF 286.12 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WEST 50TH PLACE
AS RECORDED IN BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409;
THENCE NORTH 0°03.6'WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE
OF 215.60 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 232.87 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0003.6'WEST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A
DISTANCE OF 0.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 43.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0°03.6'EAST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A
DISTANCE OF 0.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0' WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 10.24 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING
NORTH 0'03.6'WEST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 17 A DISTANCE OF
215.60 FEET FROM A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF WEST
50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN SAID BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409;
OF 97.05 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88059.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 60.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0°03.6'EAST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A
DISTANCE OF 21.14 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 97.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0003.6'WEST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A
DISTANCE OF 195.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID LOT 17;
THENCE NORTH
THENCE SOUTH 89°11.9' WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17, A DISTANCE
OF 74.50 FEET TO A POINT 518.12 FEET EAST OF THE
WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17, SAID 518.12 FEET BEING A DISTANCE MEASURED
AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17;
THENCE SOUTH 00°04.2'EAST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE OF 389.80 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE
OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN SAID BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND
409;
THENCE NORTH 88059.0'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE
AS RECORDED IN SAID BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409 A
DISTANCE OF 231.93 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL D-
A PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 13, STANDLEY HEIGHTS, BEING LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER
OF SECTION 17. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE STH P.M.. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER OF SAID SECTION 17;
THENCE SOUTH 00018'19"EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 17, THE BASIS OF BEARING, A
DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 89211'27"EAST AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 17 A DISTANCE OF
30.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89°11'27"EAST AND ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 518.12 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 13 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH 89011'27"WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 348.12 FEET TO A POINT 170.00 FEET EAST OF
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE SOUTH 00018'19"EAST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13 TO A POINT 150.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID
LOT 13;
THENCE SOUTH 89°11'27"WEST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE
OF SAID LOT 13 AND 150.00 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE SOUTH 00°18'19"EAST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 250.02 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF A
PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1862 AT PAGE 375 OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, SAID CORNER BEING
17.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE NORTH 89°11'47"EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1862 AT PAGE 375 AND PARALLEL WITH THE
SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 250.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED IN BOOK 1862 AT
PAGE 375;
THENCE NORTH 89°11'47"EAST PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 0.02 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
A PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NO. 82047968;
THENCE NORTH 89011'47"EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NUMBER 82047968 A DISTANCE OF
256.95 FEET TO A POINT 17.00 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE SOUTH 00°18'19"EAST PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 17.0 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT
13 AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL DESCRIBED AT RECEPTION NUMBER 82047968 SAID CORNER BEING 537.97 FEET EAST OF
THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER;
THENCE NORTH 89211'47"EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 10.16 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 13;
THENCE NORTH 00°18'24"WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 13 A DISTANCE OF 417.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
PARCEL E:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS;
TYPE AREA
SHEET 1
THENCE NORTH
0204.2'WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE OF 25.00
FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH
LINE OF WEST
50TH PLACE AS
CONVEYED TO JEFFERSON COUNTY BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED IN BOOK 987
AT PAGES 407 AND 409 OF SAID
OFFICIAL
RECORDS;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHOSE CENTRAL
ANGLE IS 67000.3', WHOSE RADIUS IS 270.54
THENCE NORTH
88259.0'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED
IN BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND
409 A
DISTANCE OF 750.12 FEET;
THENCE NORTH
0°03.6'WEST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE OF
215.60 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING;
THENCE SOUTH
88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE
OF 60.46 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH
0003.6'EAST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE OF
21.14 FEET;
ON
THENCE SOUTH
88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE
OF 97.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH
0203.6'WEST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE OF
195.06 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
NORTH LINE
OF SAID LOT 17;
PAGES 407 AND 409 A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED
IN
THENCE NORTH
89°11.9'EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE OF 443.59
FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID
LOT 17;
THENCE NORTH 0'WEST ALONG THE EAST EINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE
OF 2 FEET;
LOCATION
C 1/4 COR. v E 1/4 COR.
SEC. 17 Om SEC. 17
3 I RTD i
RIDGE RD /
UNINCORPORATED GOMM�,R %.� CITY OF
COUNTY ARVADA
CITY OF
r - - - WHEAT RIDGE
S 1/4 COR. - SE COR.
SEC. 17 SEC. 17
VICINITY MAP
SCALE. 1" 1000'
OWNERS CERTEICATE CONTINUED (PARCEL E CONTINUED):
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
OWNERS CERTEICATE CONTINUED:
OWNER:
TOLL SOUTHWEST, LLC
SIGNATURE
BY:
AS
STATE OF COLORADO
)SS
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON )
TOLL SOUTHWEST, LLC.
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
DAY OF
A.D. 20 BY
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
NOTARY PUBLIC
PLANNING COMMISSION CERTEICATON:
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE
OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2012 AT RECEPTION NO. 2012110197.
SUBORDINATELY DESCRIBED AS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN BEING MONUMENTED BY A NO. 6 REHAB WITH A 2-1/2 INCH ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "LS 27609 1998"IN A
RANGE BOX, WHENCE THE EAST /a CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17 AS MONUMENTED BY A 2 INCH DIAMETER PIPE WITH A
3-1/4 INCH BRASS CAP STAMPED "LS 13212 1984"IN A RANGE BOX IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°11'13"E, A DISTANCE OF
2646.81 FEET, WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO:
THENCE S82'16'17"E, A DISTANCE OF 201.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE EXISTING 60' PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAY OF WEST 52ND AVENUE AND 170.00 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13, STANDLEY
HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE N 89°11'14"E, A DISTANCE OF 348.12 FEET TO NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE S 00°18'39"E, A DISTANCE OF 414.96 FEET ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 13, TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE N 88°57'32"E, A DISTANCE OF 518.08 FEET, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID LOT 13, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO;
THENCE S 00°17'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 387.86 FEET, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN JEFFERSON COUNTY BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED IN BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND
409;
THENCE S 8844'38"W, A DISTANCE OF 1036.22 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN SAID
BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409 TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17;
THENCE N 00'18'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 658.76 FEET, ALONG THE SAID WEST LINE OF LOTS 17 AND 13 TO A POINT 150.00
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE N 89°11'14"E, A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 TO A POINT 150 FEET
SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 13;
THENCE N 00'18'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE SAID LOT 13 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 593,903 SQUARE FEET (13.6341 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING HEREON CONTAINED INTO LOTS AND TRACTS
UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF RIDGE AT WARD STATION, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE,
COLORADO AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THE PUBLIC THOSE PORTIONS OF
REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND DO FURTHER DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE
MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY
SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR
ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY
SEWER LINES, HYDRANTS, STORMWATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LIGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES
THERETO.
SHEETINDEX
TYPE AREA
SHEET 1
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS DAY OF
THENCE SOUTH 0°03.6'EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE
OF 5.27 FEET TO A NON -TANGENT
POINT
BY WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION.
ON A CURVE, SAID POINT BEING A POINT OF CURVATURE;
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SHEETS 5-8
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, WHOSE CENTRAL
ANGLE IS 67000.3', WHOSE RADIUS IS 270.54
FEET, AND WHOSE CHORD BEARS SOUTH 57°01.9'EAST A DISTANCE OF 298.66 FEET TO A POINT 240.60 FEET NORTH
OF
THE EXTENDED SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 17;
CHAIRPERSON
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT
17 A DISTANCE OF 200.44 FEET TO A POINT
50.00 FEET EAST OF THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17;
THENCE SOUTH 0°03.6'EAST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 215.60 FEET TO A POINT
ON
THE EXTENDED NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN BOOK
987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0'WEST ALONG THE EXTENDED NORTH LINE OF WEST
50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN BOOK 987
AT
CITY CERTEICATION ZACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATED INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY:
PAGES 407 AND 409 A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED
IN
1
BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409;
THENCE NORTH 0'WEST ALONG THE EAST EINE OF SAID LOT 17 A DISTANCE
OF 2 FEET;
THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, HEREBY ACCEPTS THE DEDICATION AND CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF THOSE LOTS, TRACTS,
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.9.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT
17 A DISTANCE OF 232.87 FEET;
EASEMENTS AND OTHER INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY DENOTED ON THIS PLAT AS BEING DEDICATED TO THE CITY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES.
THENCE NORTH 0°03.6' WEST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 0.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT
17 A DISTANCE OF 43.00 FEET;
APPROVED THIS DAY OF BY WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL.
THENCE SOUTH 0°03.6'EAST PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17
A DISTANCE OF 0.80 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 88°59.0'WEST PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT
17 A DISTANCE OF 10.24 FEET TO THE TRUE
ATTEST
POINT OF BEGINNING,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
CITY CLERK MAYOR
EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE
OF COLORADO, DESCRIBED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 2012 AT RECEPTION NO. 2012110197.
SUBORDINATELY DESCRIBED AS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTER 1/4 CORNER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL
MERIDIAN BEING MONUMENTED BY A NO. 6 REHAB WITH A 2-1/2 INCH ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "LS 27609 1998"IN A
RANGE BOX, WHENCE THE EAST /a CORNER OF SAID SECTION 17 AS MONUMENTED BY A 2 INCH DIAMETER PIPE WITH A
3-1/4 INCH BRASS CAP STAMPED "LS 13212 1984"IN A RANGE BOX IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N 89°11'13"E, A DISTANCE OF
2646.81 FEET, WITH ALL BEARINGS RELATIVE THERETO:
THENCE S82'16'17"E, A DISTANCE OF 201.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE EXISTING 60' PUBLIC
RIGHT OF WAY OF WEST 52ND AVENUE AND 170.00 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 13, STANDLEY
HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE ALONG THE SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE N 89°11'14"E, A DISTANCE OF 348.12 FEET TO NORTHEAST
CORNER OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE S 00°18'39"E, A DISTANCE OF 414.96 FEET ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 13, TO
THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST ONE-HALF OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE N 88°57'32"E, A DISTANCE OF 518.08 FEET, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID LOT 13, ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO;
THENCE S 00°17'58"E, A DISTANCE OF 387.86 FEET, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT 17 TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN JEFFERSON COUNTY BY INSTRUMENTS RECORDED IN BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND
409;
THENCE S 8844'38"W, A DISTANCE OF 1036.22 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 50TH PLACE AS RECORDED IN SAID
BOOK 987 AT PAGES 407 AND 409 TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 17;
THENCE N 00'18'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 658.76 FEET, ALONG THE SAID WEST LINE OF LOTS 17 AND 13 TO A POINT 150.00
FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 13;
THENCE N 89°11'14"E, A DISTANCE OF 170.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 13 TO A POINT 150 FEET
SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 13;
THENCE N 00'18'34"W, A DISTANCE OF 150.00 FEET PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE SAID LOT 13 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID PARCEL CONTAINING A CALCULATED AREA OF 593,903 SQUARE FEET (13.6341 ACRES), MORE OR LESS
HAVE LAID OUT, SUBDIVIDED AND PLATTED SAID LAND AS PER THE DRAWING HEREON CONTAINED INTO LOTS AND TRACTS
UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF RIDGE AT WARD STATION, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE,
COLORADO AND BY THESE PRESENTS DO DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THE PUBLIC THOSE PORTIONS OF
REAL PROPERTY SHOWN AS RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND DO FURTHER DEDICATE TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE AND THOSE
MUNICIPALLY OWNED AND/OR MUNICIPALLY FRANCHISED UTILITIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY
SHOWN AS EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT FOR
ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC LINES, GAS LINES, WATER AND SANITARY
SEWER LINES, HYDRANTS, STORMWATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES, DETENTION PONDS, STREET LIGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES
THERETO.
SHEETINDEX
TYPE AREA
SHEET 1
COVER SHEET
SHEET 2
TRACT AND LAND USE SUMMARY
SHEET 3
LOT SUMMARY TABLES
SHEET 4
EXISTING CONDITIONS
SHEETS 5-8
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
CASE HISTORY
WCP-18-01
WS -18-18-06
WSP-18-07
REVISION BLOCK
DESCRIPTION
DATE
INITIAL PREPARATION
9/17/2018
REVISION 1
11/13/2018
REVISION 2
1/2/2019
REVISION 3
2/14/2019
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATION:
I, KEVIN J. KUCHARCZYK., A DULY REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAT TRULY AND CORRECTLY REPRESENTS THE RESULTS OF A SURVEY MADE ON OCTOBER 25-30, 2017, BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT ALL MONUMENTS EXISTS AS SHOWN HEREON; THAT MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE ERRORS ARE LESS THAN 1:50,000 (SECOND
ORDER); AND THAT SAID PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO DEALING
WITH MONUMENTS, SUBDIVISIONS OR SURVEYING OF LAND AND ALL PROVISIONS, WITHIN MY CONTROL, OF THE TOWN SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS.
I ATTEST THE ABOVE ON THIS DAY OF
KEVIN J KUCHARCZYK., PLS NO. 34591
FOR AND ON BEHALF OF CVL CONSULTANTS OF COLORADO, INC.
10333 E. DRY CREEK ROAD, SUITE 240
ENGLEWOOD, CO 80112
(720)-249-3584
CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE:
2019.
ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF
JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO THIS DAY OF 1 20
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
BY: DEPUTY CLERK
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 8130306502
SHEET 1 OF 8
COVER SHEET
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
NOTES:
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE (3) YEARS SHEET 2 OF 8
AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN
(10) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON.
2. ANY PERSON WHO KNOWINGLY REMOVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY COMMITS A CLASS TWO (2)
MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO STATE STATUTE 18-4-508, C.R.S.
3. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY CVL CONSULTANTS OF COLORADO, INC. TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD.
FOR ALL INFORMATION REGARDING EASEMENTS, RIGHTS—OF—WAY AND TITLE OF RECORD, CVL CONSULTANTS OF COLORADO, INC. RELIED UPON
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE, COMMITMENT NO. 100—N0014041-010—TO2, AMENDMENT NO. 3, ISSUED BY FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE
COMPANY AND HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 21. 2018 AT 7:00 A.M.
4. BASIS OF BEARINGS: BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE HORIZONTAL CONTROL SYSTEM BETWEEN THE CENTER QUARTER OF SECTION 17
(POINT NO. 12109) BEING MONUMENTED BY A N0. 6 REBAR AND 2-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP IN A RANGE BOX STAMPED PLS 27609 AND THE EAST QUARTER
CORNER OF SECTION 17 (POINT NO. 12209) BEING MONUMENTED BY A 2" PIPE AND 3-1/4" BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX STAMPED LS 13212 HAVING AN
ASSUMED BEARING OF NORTH 89°11'13" EAST.
5. PER COLORADO REVISED STATUTES SEC. 38-51-106(L), ALL LINEAR UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET. ONE METER
EQUALS 39.37 DIVIDED BY 12 U.S. SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY.
6. TRACT B MAY BE USED AS PUBLIC ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS TO ADJACENT PARCELS UPON DEVELOPMENT BY OTHERS.
7. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF 201 LOTS AND 50 TRACTS IN THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION SUBDIVISION.
8. TRACTS E & U ARE NON—BUILDABLE TRACTS FOR THE USE OF STORMWATER DRAINAGE/WATER QUALITY FACILITIES AND IS FULLY ENCUMBERED BY A
STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT TO THE BENEFIT OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. THE STORMWATER DRAINAGE FACILITIES WITHIN THIS AREA SHALL BE
CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION
AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM
NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE
CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERCATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL
BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS.
9. TRACTS 1-0, Q—T, U1—V, W1—W2, X—KK, MM, AND 00—PP ARE NON—BUILDABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF UTILITIES AND OPEN SPACE.
10. TRACTS A—D AND E1—H ARE NON—BUILDABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESS AND EMERGENCY ACCESS.
11. TRACTS E. P. U. W. LL AND NN ARE NON—BUILDABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF DRAINAGE.
12. TRACT E IS NON—BUILDABLE FOR THE PURPOSE OF DRAINAGE, ACCESS, EMERGENCY ACCESS AND UTILITIES.
13. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF BLOCK 16, LOT 1, ALL LOTS ARE CONSIDERED TOWNHOME LOTS AND SHALL NOT BE DEVELOPED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN
TOWNHOMES.
14. THE POCKET PARK AND LINEAR PARKS IN TRACT U AND W SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC IN ADDITION TO OWNERS, TENANTS, CUSTOMERS AND
GUESTS.
15. THE ZONING FOR THE SITE IS MU—C TOD.
15. ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS WITHIN THE PLATTED BOUNDARY OF THE SUBDIVISION SHALL FOREVER BE REMOVED, TERMINATED, AND EXTINGUISHED UPON
RECORDATION OF THIS PLAT WITH THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER.
17. THIS PLAT CONTAINS LOTS, BLOCKS, OR OTHER LAND INTENDED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OWNER—OCCUPIED MULTI—FAMILY DWELLING UNITS OR
ASSOCIATED COMMON AREAS, LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS, OR IMPROVEMENTS (THE "MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA"). TO THE EXTENT THAT THE
FOLLOWING CLAIMS INVOLVE ANY MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA (OR THE IMPROVEMENTS THEREON) WITHIN THE PROPERTY COVERED BY THIS PLAT,
SUCH CLAIMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO BINDING ARBITRATION IN LIEU OF SUBMITTING ANY SUCH CLAIM TO A COURT OF LAW.
ANY AND ALL CLAIMS THAT ALLEGE A CONSTRUCTION DEFECT AS DEFINED AT SECTION 26-1302 OF THE CODE OF LAWS AND: (1) ARE BETWEEN ANY
TWO OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING PERSONS OR ENTITIES: (A) ANY OWNER OF ANY PORTION OF THE MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (B) ANY
COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION CREATED WITH RESPECT TO THE MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (C) THE SUBDIVIDER, DEVELOPER,
CONTRACTOR, OR ANYONE CLAIMING UNDER OR THROUGH ANY SUCH PERSONS, (D) ANY PARTY THAT CONSTRUCTS OR DESIGNS ANY PORTION OF ANY
RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS UPON THE MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, AND (E) ANY CONSTRUCTION PROFESSIONAL AS DEFINED IN THE
CONSTRUCTION DEFECT ACTION REFORM ACT, C.R.S. § 13-80-802.5, ET SEC., AS AMENDED ("CDARA"); AND (2) THAT PERTAINS TO ANY OF: (A) THE
MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (B) ANY DWELLING UNIT, COMMON AREA DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURE, LIMITED COMMON ELEMENTS, OR OTHER
IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED ON THE MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA, (C) THE COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY TO BE CREATED FOR THE
MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA OR ANY PORTION THEREOF, OR (D) THE DECLARATION OR OTHER DOCUMENTS GOVERNING SUCH COMMUNITY.
THE FOREGOING SHALL NOT PRECLUDE ANY OF THE PERSONS OR ENTITIES DESCRIBED ABOVE FROM ENDEAVORING TO RESOLVE ANY SUCH CLAIM(S)
THROUGH EITHER NEGOTIATION OR MEDIATION BEFORE SUBMITTING SUCH CLAIM(S) TO BINDING ARBITRATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE MULTI—FAMILY
DEVELOPMENT AREA MAY ALSO BE SUBJECT TO A DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS THAT MAY IMPLEMENT AND EXPAND
UPON THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PLAT NOTE AND THAT MAY EXEMPT CERTAIN CLAIMS FROM THE REQUIREMENT THAT SUCH CLAIMS MUST BE SUBMITTED
TO BINDING ARBITRATION, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT ANY SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENT OR CHANGE TO SUCH DECLARATION OF COVENANTS,CONDITIONS OR
RESTRICTION SHALL NOT ELIMINATE THIS REQUIREMENT THAT CONSTRUCTION DEFECT CLAIMS SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO BIDING ARBITRATION IN LIEU OF
SUBMITTING ANY SUCH CLAIM TO A COURT OF LAW.
FOR PURPOSES OF THIS PLAT NOTE, BINDING ARBITRATION SHALL MEAN SUBMISSION OF ANY CLAIM DESCRIBED ABOVE TO THE ARBITRATION SERVICE
PROVIDER SPECIFIED IN THE DECLARATION OR OTHER GOVERNING DOCUMENTS OF THE COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY, IF QUALIFIED PURSUANT TO THE
UNIFORM ARBITRATION ACT, PART 2 OF ARTICLE 22 OF TITLE 13, C.R.S., AND, IF NOT, AN ARBITRATION SERVICE PROVIDER SO QUALIFIED IN SUCH
ARBITRATION; THE COSTS AND EXPENSES OF ARBITRATION TO BE BORNE EQUALLY BY THE PARTIES.
ALL FUTURE PURCHASERS OF ANY INTEREST IN THE
MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA ARE DEEMED TO
HAVE ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF
THIS PLAT NOTE AND SHALL BE
BOUND BY THE PLAT NOTE, WHICH IS RECORDED IN
THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDER'S OFFICE,
DEEMED TO BE A COVENANT RUNNING
WITH THE MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA,
AND BINDING UPON ALL SUCCESSORS IN
INTEREST, GRANTEES,
OWNERS, HEIRS, ASSIGNS, AND
ALL OTHERS WHO ACQUIRE AN INTEREST IN OR TO
THE MULTI—FAMILY DEVELOPMENT AREA,
TOGETHER WITH ANY
COMMON INTEREST COMMUNITY
ASSOCIATION ASSOCIATED THEREWITH.
20,401 S.F.
18. THE OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANTS LIMITED RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES TO ACCESS AND TO FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH THOSE AREAS
INDICATED AS 'ACCESS EASEMENT/EMERGENCY ACCESS' AS ILLUSTRATED ON THIS PLAT. SUCH GRANT OF EASEMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE OWNERS,
TENANTS, CUSTOMERS, GUESTS OF THE OWNERS, EMERGENCY PERSONNEL/VEHICLES, AND SHALL FURTHERMORE GRANT ACCESS TO AND FREE MOVEMENT
FROM SIMILARLY RECORDED EASEMENTS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR ABUTTING PUBLIC STREETS.
THE OWNER, HIS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANTS LIMITED RIGHTS AND PRIVILEGES TO ACCESS AND TO FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH THOSE
AREAS INDICATED AS ACCESS EASEMENTS (A.E.) AND AS ILLUSTRATED UPON THIS PLAT. SUCH GRANT OF EASEMENT SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE
OWNERS, TENANTS, CUSTOMERS, GUESTS OF THE OWNERS, AND EMERGENCY ACCESS AND SHALL FURTHERMORE GRANT ACCESS TO AND FREE
MOVEMENT THROUGH SAID EASEMENTS TO THOSE ENTERING SAID EASEMENTS FROM SIMILARLY RECORDED EASEMENTS FROM ADJACENT
PROPERTIES AND/OR FROM ABUTTING PUBLIC STREETS.
STATEMENT OF ACCURACY:
THE GEODETIC POINT COORDINATE DATA SHOWN HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM THE NAD 83 HARN STATE PLANE COLORADO CENTRAL LIPS
0502 COORDINATE SYSTEM, AND HAS A HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASSIFICATION OF 0.07 U.S. SURVEY FEET AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL, AS
DEFINED IN THE GEOSPATIAL ACCURACY STANDARDS OF THE FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE (FGDC—STD-007.2-1998).
PER COLORADO REVISED STATUTES SEC. 38-51-106(L), ALL LINEAR UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS LAND SURVEY PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET. ONE
METER EQUALS 39.37 DIVIDED BY 12 U.S. SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY.
CURRENT CITY DATUM:
1. THIS PLAT IS BASED ON THE CURRENT CITY DATUM, WHICH USES A HORIZONTAL COORDINATE SYSTEM THAT IS GROUND—BASED, MODIFIED
FORM OF THE NAD83/92 STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM, COLORADO CENTRAL ZONE 0502, AND THE NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988
(NAVD88).
2. THE GROUND TO STATE PLANE GRID COMBINED SCALE FACTOR IS 0.99974780300, SCALED FROM BASE POINT PHAC1 (PERMANENT HIGH
ACCURACY CONTROL POINT # 1) HAVING THE FOLLOWING NAD83/92 (NAD83 HARN) STATE PLANE COORDINATES: PHAC 1: NORTHING: 1701258.75,
EASTING: 3118217.58, ELEVATION 5471.62 (NAVD 88).
TRACT SUMMARY TABLE
TRACT AREA
AREA
USE
A
0.133 AC.
5,783 S.F.
UTILITIES/ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
B
0.387 AC.
16,878 S.F.
UTILITIES/ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
C
0.493 AC.
21,475 S.F.
UTILITIES / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
D
0.468 AC.
20,401 S.F.
UTILITIES / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
E
0.283 AC.
12,321 S.F.
DRAINAGE / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS / UTILITIES
E-1
0.034 AC.
1,482 S.F.
UTILITIES / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
E-2
0.012 AC.
520 S.F.
UTILITIES / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
F
0.081 AC.
3,510 S.F.
UTILITIES / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
G
0.081 AC.
3,510 S.F.
UTILITIES / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
H
0.081 AC.
3,510 S.F.
UTILITIES / ACCESS / EMERGENCY ACCESS
0.038 AC.
1,636 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
J
0.012 AC.
512 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
K
0.012 AC.
525 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
L
0.159 AC.
6,944 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
M
0.018 AC.
787 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
N
0.012 AC.
528 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
0
0.007 AC.
299 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
P
0.050 AC.
2,178 S.F.
DRAINAGE / OPEN SPACE
Q
0.032 AC.
1,402 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
R
0.013 AC.
578 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
S
0.020 AC.
852 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
T
0.160 AC.
6,953 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
U
0.347 AC.
15,136 S.F.
DRAINAGE / OPEN SPACE
U-1
0.060 AC.
2,595 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
U-2
0.059 AC.
2,562 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
U-3
0.059 AC.
2,557 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
U-4
0.059 AC.
2,561 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
V
0.018 AC.
801 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
W
0.508 AC.
22,113 S.F.
DRAINAGE / OPEN SPACE
W-1
0.014 AC.
608 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
W-2
0.018 AC.
765 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
X
0.012 AC.
534 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
Y
0.022 AC.
969 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
Z
0.007 AC.
293 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
AA
0.007 AC.
317 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
BB
0.018 AC.
798 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
CC
0.011 AC.
501 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
DD
0.026 AC.
1,122 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
EE
0.011 AC.
489 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
FF
0.045 AC.
1,953 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
GG
0.007 AC.
290 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
HH
0.175 AC.
7,622 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
II
0.006 AC.
282 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
JJ
0.013 AC.
570 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
KK
0.013 AC.
570 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
LL
0.038 AC.
1,660 S.F.
DRAINAGE / OPEN SPACE
MM
0.006 AC.
244 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
NN
0.019 AC.
844 S.F.
DRAINAGE / OPEN SPACE
00
0.020 AC.
868 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
PP
0.009 AC.
410 S.F.
OPEN SPACE/UTILITIES
LAND USE SUMMARY CHART
TYPE
AREA
AREA
% OF TOTAL AREA
TOWNHOUSE LOTS
5.685 AC.
247,647 S.F.
41.69%
BLOCK 16, LOT 1
0.225 AC.
9,784 S.F.
1.65%
OPEN SPACE / UTILITIES
1.178 AC.
51,296 S.F.
8.64%
ACCESS / UTILITIES
1.769 AC.
77,069 S.F.
12.98%
DRAINAGE
1.245 AC.
54,251 S.F.
9.13%
ROAD RIGHT OF WAY
3.532 AC.
153,856 S.F.
25.91%
TOTAL
13.634 AC.
593,903 S.F.
100%
MIN, MAX, AND AVERAGE LOT SIZE
TYPE
SQ. FT.
AREA
MINIMUM LOT SIZE
1,136 S.F.
0.026 AC.
MAXIMUM LOT SIZE
2,467 S.F.
0.057 AC.
AVERAGE LOT SIZE
1,238 S.F.
0.029 AC.
BLOCK 16, LOT 1
9,784 S.F.
0.225 AC.
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 8130306502
SHEET 2 OF 8
TRACT AND LAND USE SUMMARY
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET 3 OF 8
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
LOT SUMMARY TABLE
BLOCK NO.
LOT NO.
SQUARE
FOOT
ACRES
1
1
1268
S. F.
0.029
AC.
2
1248
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1248
S. F.
0.029
AC.
9
4
1136
S. F.
0.026
AC.
5
1136
S. F.
0.026
AC.
14
6
1156
S. F.
0.027
AC.
2
1
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
6
2
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
4
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
7
5
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
6
1273
S. F.
0.029
AC.
7
1372
S. F.
0.032
AC.
8
1505
S. F.
0.035
AC.
9
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
10
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
10
11
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
12
1162
S. F.
0.027
AC.
13
1254
S. F.
0.029
AC.
14
1254
S. F.
0.029
AC.
15
15
1161
S. F.
0.027
AC.
16
1162
S. F.
0.027
AC.
17
1254
S. F.
0.029
AC.
11
18
1254
S. F.
0.029
AC.
19
1162
S. F.
0.027
AC.
3
1
1182
S. F.
0.027
AC.
2
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
4
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
5
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
8
6
1182
S. F.
0.027
AC.
7
1182
S. F.
0.027
AC.
8
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
9
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
12
10
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
11
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
12
1182
S. F.
0.027
AC.
4
1
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
2
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
4
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
5
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
6
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
7
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
16
8
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
5
1
1234
S. F.
0.028
AC.
2
1212
S. F.
0.028
AC.
3
1212
S. F.
0.028
AC.
4
1222
S. F.
0.028
AC.
5
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
6
1428
S. F.
0.033
AC.
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
LOT SUMMARY TABLE
BLOCK NO.
LOT NO.
SQUARE
FOOT
ACRES
7
1366
S. F.
0.031
AC.
8
1405
S. F.
0.032
AC.
9
1399
S. F.
0.032
AC.
9
10
1298
S. F.
0.030
AC.
11
1359
S. F.
0.031
AC.
14
12
1433
S. F.
0.033
AC.
13
1362
S. F.
0.031
AC.
6
1
1529
S. F.
0.035
AC.
2
1245
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1594
S. F.
0.037
AC.
7
1
1427
S. F.
0.033
AC.
2
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
3
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
4
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
5
1263
S. F.
0.029
AC.
6
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
10
7
1182
S. F.
0.027
AC.
8
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
9
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
15
11
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
12
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
13
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
11
14
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
15
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
16
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
17
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
18
1262
S. F.
0.029
AC.
19
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
20
1299
S. F.
0.030
AC.
8
1
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
2
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
3
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
4
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
12
5
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
6
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
7
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
8
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
9
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
11
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
12
2467
S. F.
0.057
AC.
13
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
14
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
16
15
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
3
16
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
17
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
18
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
19
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
20
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
21
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
LOT SUMMARY TABLE
BLOCK NO.
LOT NO.
SQUARE
FOOT
ACRES
22
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
23
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
24
1176
S. F.
0.027
AC.
9
1
1198
S. F.
0.027
AC.
2
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
14
3
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
4
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
5
1204
S. F.
0.028
AC.
6
1325
S. F.
0.030
AC.
7
1204
S. F.
0.028
AC.
8
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
9
1178
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
11
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
12
1199
S. F.
0.028
AC.
13
1371
S. F.
0.031
AC.
10
1
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
2
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
4
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
15
5
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
6
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
7
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
11
1
1381
S. F.
0.032
AC.
2
1238
S. F.
0.028
AC.
3
1238
S. F.
0.028
AC.
4
1238
S. F.
0.028
AC.
5
1238
S. F.
0.028
AC.
6
1259
S. F.
0.029
AC.
7
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
8
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
9
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
11
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
12
1
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
2
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
3
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
4
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
5
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
6
1171
S. F.
0.027
AC.
7
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
8
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
9
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
16
11
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
3
1
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
2
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
3
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
4
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
5
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
6
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 8130306502
SHEET 3 OF 8
LOT SUMMARY TABLES
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
LOT SUMMARY TABLE
BLOCK NO.
LOT NO.
SQUARE
FOOT
ACRES
7
1291
S. F.
0.030
AC.
8
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
9
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
11
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
14
1
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
2
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
4
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
5
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
6
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
7
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
8
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
9
1182
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1295
S. F.
0.030
AC.
11
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
12
1271
S. F.
0.029
AC.
13
1156
S. F.
0.027
AC.
14
1156
S. F.
0.027
AC.
15
1575
S. F.
0.036
AC.
15
1
1500
S. F.
0.034
AC.
2
1274
S. F.
0.029
AC.
3
1204
S. F.
0.028
AC.
4
1181
S. F.
0.027
AC.
5
1320
S. F.
0.030
AC.
6
2300
S. F.
0.053
AC.
7
1335
S. F.
0.031
AC.
8
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
9
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
10
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
11
1157
S. F.
0.027
AC.
12
1177
S. F.
0.027
AC.
13
1185
S. F.
0.027
AC.
14
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
15
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
16
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
17
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
18
1185
S. F.
0.027
AC.
19
1185
S. F.
0.027
AC.
20
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
21
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
22
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
23
1160
S. F.
0.027
AC.
24
1169
S. F.
0.027
AC.
16
1
9784
S. F.
0.225
AC.
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 8130306502
SHEET 3 OF 8
LOT SUMMARY TABLES
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET 4 OF 8
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)
PT. N0. 12109
646.81'
C 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17 N89°11'13"E
NORTH LINE, SEI/4, SEC. 17
FOUND #6 DEBAR AND 2-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP _ W. 52ND AVENUE
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 8130306509
LEGEND
FOUND SECTION CORNER
(AS NOTED)
FOUND PROPERTY MONUMENT
O (AS NOTED)
SET 18" LONG #5 REBAR &
1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED "PLS 34591"
EX. EXISTING
R.O.W. RIGHT OF WAY
50 25 0 50 100
SCALE: 1" = 50'
SHEET 4 OF 8
EXISTING CONDITIONS
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
NOTE:
STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY MONUMENTS SHALL BE SET PRIOR TO
FINAL LIFT OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT. MONUMENT HARDWARE AND
RANGE BOXES WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT
RIDGE UPON REQUEST (303.235.2861
LEGEND
J. E.
UTILITY EASEMENT
F.S.D.
FRUITDALE SANITARY DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
V.W.D.
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
A.E.
ACCESS EASEMENT / EMERGENCY ACCESS
EX U.E.
EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT
R.O.W.
RIGHT OF WAY
•
SET 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED LS NO. 34591
0
FOUND 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED ITS NO. 25369
O
SET 30" LONG #6 REBAR & 2" ALUMINUM CAP
A####
SET 3-1/4" BRASS CAP ON 30" LONG & 2-1/4"
DIAMETER ALUMINUM PIPE STAMPED ITS NO. 34591. THE
NUMBER REPRESENTS THE CITY MONUMENT DESIGNATION.
13.00'
EASEMENT LINE
S45'18'34"E
TRACT AND LOT LINE
C4
RIGHT OF WAY LINE
CURVE TABLE
CURVE NO.
LENGTH
RADIUS
DELTA
CHORD DIRECTION
CHORD LENGTH
C1
20.53'
13.00'
9030'07"
N4533'42"W
18.47'
C2
11.19'
13.00'
49'19'02"
N65°01'55"E
10.85'
C3
20.42'
13.00'
90°00'00"
S45'18'34"E
18.38'
C4
20.31'
13.00'
89°29'53"
S44'26'1 8"W
1&30'
C5
16.88'
13.00'
74°24'34"
53'10'07"W
15.72'
C6
18.18'
13.00'
80°08'22"
S74°06'21 "E
16.74'
C7
72.60'
181.50'
22°55'10"
S77°17'03"W
72.12'
C8
20.20'
13.00'
89°02'43"
N44'13'17"E
18.23'
C9
20.42'
13.00'
90°00'00"
S44°41'26"W
18.38'
C10
12.77'
13.00'
56'16'24"
N62'1 0'22"W
12.26'
C11
67.80'
118.50'
32°46'48"
NI 7'38'46"W
66.88'
C12
20.42'
13.00'
90°00'00"
N43'44'38"E
18.38'
C13
20.42'
13.00'
90°00'00"
S46°15'22"E
18.38'
C14
57.97'
181.50'
18'17'57"
NI 0'24'20"W
57.72'
C15
20.52'
13.00'
90°25'13"
52539'17"W
18.45'
C16
36.98'
118.50'
17°52'45"
S79'48'1 6"W
36.83'
C17
20.64'
13.00'
90'57'17"
N45°46'43"W
18.54'
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
LENGTH
DIRECTION
1.1
14.50'
N88°44'38"E
1.2
20.00'
NO°18'34"W
1.3
20.00'
NO°18'05"W
S 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17
FOUND 2" DIAMETER PIPE
WITH 3-1/4" BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX PLS 13212
STATE PLANE COORD
N: 1710537.5325 LAT: 39'47'01.23408"N
E: 3101757.2008 LONG: 105'08'16.56364"W
WHEAT RIDGE DATUM
N: 710969.0338
E 102539.6519
BEING A PART OF THE
14.5' PUBLIC R.O.W.
HEREBY DEDICATED J
TO THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE
BY THIS PLAT
> U o OD
Q O o CC)
Ln
O co
o m
L
b w
� or7
W z 1b
w o
o
Z
N: 712770.604
E 102559 929 FFF
PT. NO. 12109
C 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17
FOUND #6 REBAR AND 2-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP
IN RANGE BOX PLS 27609
STATE PLANE COORD
N: 1713176.7555 LAT: 39'47'27.31690"N
E 3101742.8843 LONG: 105'08'16.61228"W
CITY WHEAT RIDGE DATUM
N: 713608.9225 N: 713581.767
E 102525.3318
E 102725.544
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET 5 OF 8
rUnLl1 K. V. VV. NLKLnT
DEDICATED
W. 52ND AVENUE
.X. 60' PUBLIC R.O.'
N: 713586.704
�'F- in 7iL73 63n
(BASIS OF BEARINGS)
_ NBY'11'13"E 2646.81'
NORTH LINE, SE 1/4 SEC. 17
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
PT. NO. 12209
E 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17
FOUND 2" DIAMETER PIPE WITH
3-1/4" BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX PLS 13212
STATE PLANE COORD
N: 1713214.3018 LAT: 39'47'27.58238"N
E 3104388.8933 LONG: 105'07'42.71372"W
WHEAT RIDGE DATUM
N: 713646.4783
E 105172.0083
N: 713181.168
E: 103593.876
STANDLEYHE/GHTS
ZONED AE
LOT 14
WARD ROAD STAT/ON
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 50
( IN FEET )
I inch - 50 ft.
SHEET 5 OF 8
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
OVERALL PLAN
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
LvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
C: Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 8130306505
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
KEY MAP
LEGEND
U. E.
UTILITY EASEMENT
F.S.D.
FRUITDALE SANITARY DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
V.W.D.
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
A.E.
ACCESS EASEMENT / EMERGENCY ACCESS
EX U.E.
EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT
R.O.W.
RIGHT OF WAY
C2
SET 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED LS NO. 34591
O
FOUND 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED LS NQ 25369
O
SET 30" LONG #6 REBAR & 2" ALUMINUM CAP
STAMPED I S NO. 34591
0####
SET 3-1/4" BRASS CAP ON 30" LONG & 2-1/4"
DIAMETER ALUMINUM PIPE STAMPED LS NO. 34591. THE
NUMBER REPRESENTS THE CITY MONUMENT DESIGNATION.
90°00'00"
EASEMENT LINE
S44°41'27"W
TRACT AND LOT LINE
C4
BOUNDARY LINE
CURVE TABLE
CURVE NO.
RADIUS
DELTA
LENGTH
CHORD DIRECTION
CHORD LENGTH
C1
13.00'
90°30'07"
20.53'
N45°33'42"W
18.47'
C2
13.00'
90°00'07"
20.42'
S45C8'30"E
18.39'
C3
26.00'
90°00'00"
40.84'
S44°41'27"W
36.77'
C4
27.00'
40°23'54"
19.04'
N1 9'53'23"E
18.65'
C5
53.00'
40°23'54"
37.37'
N1 9'53'23"E
36.60'
C6
13.00'
49°19'03"
11.19'
N65°01'55"E
10.85'
C7
13.00'
89°29'53"
20.31'
S44'26'1 8"W
18.30'
C8
10.00'
90°30'08"
15.80'
N45°33'43"W
14.20'
C9
113.01'
2°42'57"
5.36'
N61'05'51 "E
5.36'
C10
26.00'
90°30'06"
41.07'
S45°33'40"E
36.93'
C11
5200'
90°30'13"
82.14'
S45°33'40"E
73.86'
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L1
S46°04'02"W
13.75'
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 30 60
( IN FEET )
1 inch - 30 ft.
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET 6 OF 8
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
588°2,_' 06"W
20 9.17'
POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PT. NO. 12109
C 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17
FOUND #5 REBAR AND 2-1/2" ALUMINUM CAP
IN RANGE BOX PLS 27609
STATE PLANE COOED
N: 1713176.7555 LAT: 39'47'27.31690"N
E 3101742.8943 LONG: 105'08'16.61228"W
CITY WHEAT RIDGE DATUM
N: 713608.9225
E 102525.3318
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
_SB2'76'77"E POINT OF o
201 98, � BEGINNING
(77E)
3.00'
N89°11'13"E 2646.81
W. 52ND AVENUEBASIS OF BEARINGS
(Ex. 60' PUBLIC R.O.W.) N. LINE, SE 1/4 SEC.
3' PUBLIC R.O.W. HEREBY
DEDICATED BY
S89°11'14"W 184.00' THIS PLAT
N89°11'13"E 348.12'
22.65' 22.29' 22.29' 20.29' 20.29' 17.57' 4, C'7
#9390
3' PUBLIC R.O.W. HEREBY
FF DEDICATED BY
IG! THIS PLAT
0
S89'11'14"W 75.12'
ME
PT. NO. 12209
E 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17
FOUND 2" DIAMETER PIPE WITH
3-1/4" BRASS CAP
IN RANGE BOX PLS 13212
STATE PLANE COORD
N: 1713214.3018 LAT: 39'47' 27.58238"N
E 3104388.8933 LONG: 105'07'42.71372"W
WHEAT RIDGE DATUM
N: 713646.4783
E 1051720083
5.00'co
L=3.10' Y=2YI
a a O 5' U E w o 0
M r O O O O IM Y
61 ^ O O O O O tp O O
N N c0 LL U [O li U t9 LL U 6 L� U 10 L� U t9 L� U �fJ U U N li U c0 L� V t0 li U
O O u7 Ul Q u7 fl) a ID U1 a N V] a Ln U]'D ID Ul a if] < Q l0 fA Q Lf] (/] IfJ Q
m coo coo or �m NK~ °'n 3 aN m�
TRACT 13 co No 3 m o ' m o 3 '� 0 3 '� o 'n No 3 rvi in 0 N O 0
z _
1,536 S.F. _o �o v �o a �o v �o �0 0
0.038 AC.
I d d Q �a °O O N O M
1 O O N O M O V O N O m O U N \\
N O O O O O O O O O O N ,nom
Z Z Z
S U.
Oz
5° uE�z Mo �a
0 W S'O - _ -
x 0.00' -27.56'-- -2223'- -2821'-
O Ls - 2265' --22.29'- -22.29'- 20.29- X0.29'- 20.65 9.55'
O A S69°11'14"W 143.89' 589°11'14"W 88.00'
o OE� 30' V HID., a 0 TRACT B
F. SD. UE
r�S7 9Y SZEAAD TE 5,783 SAF. PRIVATE ALLEY 26'A.E N N 0387 AC.
x DOC &ZA/T 0.133 AC.
ZONED -E
�L�24 S89°11'14"W 139.56' 589'11'1- 46.91' 06
pG �3� -13.32' -20.64'-10.22' -20.65'----22.29'- --22.29'' -20.65'- 9.59
O 20 =9.02' :5' U.E
O U a n o «i 1,427 S.F. m
Z cmo �n �n LL a N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o N O
0.033 AC.
�Q vi< uia via via uri via N C) Ifs U.E J
v Io d N 3 N 3 3 3 W N 3 W N 3 n o 3 889°41'21"W 57.00' Q
60' EX. R.O.W. a o0 a o o v o a v a� .� 2 r� F
o a m W 0 1,157 S.F. o Q LOT 1A
0 Oo o m 0 N v a a M °Oo N °ao O N 0.027 AC. "' ZONED PID
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N a
30' 30' z o
S89'41'21"W 57.00' 1
2 z5'UE z 2 5'UE
_ ri o a 3 0 .31' UE, AE
TRACT L
6,944 S.F. 20.65' 22.29 22.29' 20.64' 20.65' 22.29' 2229' 20.65' N N 0 "� 1,157 S.F. o
0.159 AC. 889°11'14"W 85.87 TRACTL 589'11'14"W 85.88' o NN 0.027 AC,
3 30' V141.0,
N 8911 14 E 170.00' 6,944 SF. N 3 FSO UE
0.159 AC. o } O S89°41'21"W 57.00'
- 15b_50 889°41'26"W 67,59' -------*589°41'26"W 84.75' 589°41' 6"W 84.76' 9Y SEPARATE
14.50 7.42' 2 -� 22.65' 22.29' 22.65' 26.38' 22.00' 22.00' 20.37' 20.38' 22.00' 22.00' 20.38' WIC I- co- 4 5 UES m DOCUMENT
S89°41'26"W 57.00'90 S89'41'26"W Lu Lu W o N 1,271 SE N
1 26.00' 2 5' U E 5' U E Z d z N 0.029 AC
O 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 b o 0 0 0 0 0 0 W U� tO
0 o O o O o 0 o O o O
0 1,152 S.F. o L� �i 2 cv 2 cv L: cv r L� cv L� ci L� ci L` '� cv '� W 'L 0 tO
N N W E a a '� a E a in a a a a . i via F ui a E via Z b O S89'41'21"W 57.00'
0.027 AC. in N ui in vi vi in w W W w vi u� W in u� ui ur u� Q Q W
26'A.E o o� �o Nn ym vrn �n Nr ym �o� Nr Ip} in in _
3 3 mr� nN mn 3 3 coN 3 NN 3 ,nN 3 ON 3 3 �N 3 LnN Nn 3 cD 3 0' m 5 ��
S89°41'26"W 57.00' N O NO NO o N o N o o O N o N o N 1,263 SE N
"v�0 a a �o �o a -70 �0 a �a �o v �0 a � (h N An
O n M ,.,r N � � r� r� n � (p 0.029 AC. M
N 2 C m _m m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o S89°41'21"W 57.00' o )
cA 1,271 SE N m o � � � `O o o m o �' o 0
E.0
029 AC. r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63' R.O.W. z
Ir z 2 z z z z `5• UE z 2 z z 6 w
S89'41'26"W 57.00' 0
L - _ N 0.0930 AC. N
m 0 2265'`--2229`--2265`-9.00-20.38- X200`- X200'-- �0.3T- 9.00' -20.38'- X200'- X200'---20.38` 9.51' N
N 3 N S89'41 26"W 269.61' 31.5' 31.5'
0 1,157 S.F. 0 889'41'21"W 57.00'
N 0.027 AS, �" .00' 30' VWD., - m TRACT
FSO. U.E TRACT 26' U.E., A.E. 0 801 S.F. o O
PRIVATE ALLEY 21,475 S.F. 0 0.018 AC U7
589°41'26"W 57.00' 9Y SER4RA TE N
DOCUMENT 0.493 AC. WHEAT RIDGE INDUSTRIAL
o� 4 � 589'41'21"W 57.00' CENTER SUBDIVISION
N TRACTC S89°41'26"W 64.61'
889°41'26"W 153.00'
N t,27t SF. N a N PEC. NO. F0672939
N N 21,475 S.F. 8.34' 20.65' 2229' 22.29' 20.65' 18.78 -1.7T- -TRACT78S.F. - 7
0.029 AS 3----��
5' UES{ 0.493 AC. 5 i� 578 S.F. '16 0 1,182 SE O o
C' OR's ren o o ren L° N77• 0.013 AC. 0.. 027 AC.
S89°41'26"W 57.00' ry0 L -J TRACTT 0 0 ® 5' UE_ O o 46'48-w f5' U.E.
_ r 5,953 S.F. 0 o O 0 o N 3 WI 86.78' #9389 o
N a N o S89°41'1"W 57.00'
w >
-AD m 6 N / 0.160 AC. U �j 2 cv u�i L� cv i L� cj i i TRACT S 0 0 13 6.06' J
> cv h N 1,271 S.F. N ) S89'41'26"W 56.85' vi a "5a N a N a 852 S.F. z 0,031 ACzZ ZZ B N
O o O N 0.029 AG N O � m r N
w z oC =2.75' S' UE N N n N W N "' L 2.08 0.031 AC.
z 4 ^ o NO "v N o � o 0.020 AC. N77 14.59' 0.029 AC. N O
Q Q U in n o 0 rn 0 0 � o ren ) 46'4S'W r
z v a O S69°41'26"W 57.00' 0 5 m oa ro ro m o- 0 65.22' -' J
w Q' J m 1.291 SE N f 7 d N' F
wz s 00 a 6 °' 0.030 Aa `� 0 v o M 0 N 0 0 / I/ 12 J W ,. 889°41'21"W 57.00' Q
O ' N 0 1,182 S.F. o m o O U 1,433 S.F. �� v O m g N
S89'41'26"W 57.00' 0.033 AC.
U LL Q Ln N 0.027 AC. N r.j 5' (/E z O� / O N I
1,157 s.F. o a
'DO� N �°j, rns' N77'46. it u o N 0.027 Ac.
w } 889°41'26"W 57.00' ! ® m m '` O � � 43"W v 30' VWD.,
O X 3 N 6 N 20.65' 22.29' 22.29' 20.65' ^ y ri 64.27= o a a
U W TRACT M m� N m or' p o
O rn N 1,271 S.F. N m S89°41'26"W 85.88' / h �� o S89'41'21 "W 57.0,
a ri 787 S.F. rri v p N 0.029 AC. N / ,N P� .24' 1,3591 S.F. ^� h m 9Y SEPARATE
z 0.018 AC. S) } 3 r a ,C� o N 10 N DOCUMENT
0 889°41'26"W 57.00' 0 W S89441'26"W 57.00' 0.031 AC. o ,
044jN v�P vv .99' N77• G 4� O Ni 1,271 S.F. N
W v Q b� r7 ,000 QQ� W.�/ 48'45"w 6 b 2N h0/ 61p N
r 7 / 22' // n 0.029 AC.
o� P 8. co 5' UES
O 1,152 S.F. o w o N 7 N o 30' FSO. U.E ,<<r O' Sx A`'b // o
I- N 9' 4i u o 2 LOT 1B
�c�i 1,271 S.F. N 9Y SEEDAD TE TRACTC o / Sx, TRACTQ 0 v / 2 0 589°41'�1"W 57.00'
N 0.027 AC. j o / N
f5' UE 0.029 Ac. `� DOCUMENT 21,475 S.F. h vo x0, 1,402 S.F. 0A ^ v o N in ZONED PID
K / O F 0.032 AC. 0 CD - m 11 m TRACT B
889'41'26"W 57.00' a 589°41'26"W 57.00' TRACTT 0.493 AC ao 0, o
0 0 1,177 S.F. 0 16,878 SF.
6,953 S.F. Y S ti°j O'2 B p W� M � 0.027 AS. 0.387 AC.
9S 29 �. 40 ,h ro N N
0o m 0.160 AC. °�
N B NY2. ,O#' `ti x9° `TO S x" rr ri uwi 589'41'21"W 57.06'
cV 1,271 S.F. cJ B m GN -9N0 /�� A Sx' 9.,o U, �O�
N 0.029 AC. Nj 1,291 S.F. N 'E R x0" -
0.030 Ac. ,N6450g 0� N `L S OT3 5' UE �0� m V TRACT W-2 0.018 S.
889'41'26"W 57.00' 889'4126'W 57.00' CHB 32 R' 4n 4.94' x9s 038`9 OR9 N 37' UE, AE
_- __L_75. ii� x• 2 ST S. S89'41'2VW 57.00'
N°' -.00'--------- k005 U 9 020,0-
14.5' R.O.W. HEREBY o 1,157 S.F. � N 889'41'26"W 68.00' GV` �: y60,E�y� � F � � � 12 no m
1,177 SE
DEDICATED TO THE 0.027 Acs' UES 30' V.W0' WEE p N �:�� 0x9 goxos P�2 0.027 Ac.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE S89°41'26"W 57.00' BY SEPARATE g Ngtr NONWC9 G9 SxR S� A'"
BY THIS PLAT ! DOCUMENT g2a 1r* F 1Ir'/
N GN �� R' 09 O•. 90 F TRACTW 889°41'21"W 57.00'
rn 5.00' 7 6 bj 22,113 S.F. --
0 N
N 1,271 S.F. AI Sa9°41'26"W 58.00' �=2LUL 1017' Sx 006'6' 6?9 / hi^ N
0.508 AC. 0 13 N
s. G� S, s, aV N 1,021 s.F.
0.029 AS, S� - 20.65'- -20.29' - - 20.28'- L=18 61'- i ^ N 0.029 AC. 0
_ Sx, °9 ,c
889'41'26"W 57.00' 5' L 1.7a
_ _ 0O 69 `L h / N S89'41'21"W 57.00' z
N 11 N n n r r L'- U N 'i aC\ b 1n in
14
Ni 1,271 SF. N TRACT °' m Uc� rn Loci m u'ti m '�O via O rn OrLN o 1,177 S.F. O N88°rJ7'32"E 518.08'
N I � a2s Ac. �a via �, �a via N �o NM W
1 _5 AE -.C' 299 S.F. N is m co v o
a o N N N o TRACT P P 0.027 AC.
0.007 AC, -3-P- roN 3 N 3 N '� No -o �0 2,178 S.F. o S00'18'39"E
47.58
S89'41 26"W 57.00' 3 N 2 N o cA o N o N 0 S89'41'�1"W 57.00 0
n .,1 o n o 0 0.050 AC 15.11'
6.82'
v 12 v m m m ca ro r�i m !'1 m n.00
1,152 10 S.F. O O O O N O M O
=3.13' 0027 Ac. 2s' UE, z o S o MATCHLINE -SEE SHEET 8
889°41'26"W 56.62' A. E.
5' U.E�
A TRACTN 528 SF. m 5.00'
OL2g• 0.012 AC. w 26.00' 20.65' 20.29' ?0,28' 20.3 ' 20.29' O6
44.00' S89'41 26"W 215.22'
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 7
SHEET 6 OF 8
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
NORTHWEST PLAN
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 813030650fl
LEGEND
J. E.
UTILITY EASEMENT
F.S.D.
FRUITDALE SANITARY DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
V.W.D.
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
A.E.
ACCESS EASEMENT / EMERGENCY ACCESS
EX U.E.
EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT
R.O.W.
RIGHT OF WAY
0
SET 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED LS NO. 34591
O
FOUND 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED LS NO. 25,369
N43°44'38"E
SET 30" LONG #6 REBAR & 2" ALUMINUM CAP
STAMPED LS NO. 34591
C14
SET 3-1/4" BRASS CAP ON 30" LONG & 2-1/4"
DIAMETER ALUMINUM PIPE STAMPED LS NO. 34591. THE
NUMBER REPRESENTS THE CITY MONUMENT DESIGNATION.
32°46'48"
EASEMENT LINE
NN 7'38'46"W
TRACT AND LOT LINE
C15
BOUNDARY LINE
CURVE TABLE
CURVE NO.
RADIUS
DELTA
LENGTH
CHORD DIRECTION
CHORD LENGTH
C12
13.00'
89°59'53"
20.42'
S44°41'30"W
18.38'
C13
13.00'
90°00'00"
20.42'
N43°44'38"E
18.38'
C14
118.50'
32°46'48"
67.80'
NN 7'38'46"W
66.88'
C15
13.00'
56°16'23"
12.77'
N62'1 0'22"W
12.26'
C16
63.00'
56.16'25"
61.88'
N62'1 0'22"W
59.42'
C17
63.00'
32°46'49"
36.04'
NN 7'38'46"W
35.55'
C18
37.00'
56.16'23"
36.34'
N62'1 0'22"W
34.90'
C19
37.00'
32'46'48"
21.17'
N1 7'38'46"W
20.88'
C20
26.00'
90.56'50"
41.27'
S45'46'58"E
37.07'
C21
13.00'
74'24'34"
16.88'
S03'1 0'07"W
15.72'
C22
13.00'
80'08'22"
18.18'
574'06'21 "E
16.74'
C23
181.50
22'55'10"
72.60'
S77'1 7'03"W
72.12'
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L2
N89°41'26"E
26.00'
1.3
N89°43'41"E
10.00'
L4
S00'1 8'33"E
9.83'
L5
S89'43'41 "W
9.50'
1.7
S00'1 8'34"E
57.01'
1.8
N01.15'22"W
7.39'
L9
N55°57'50"E
11.19'
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 30 60
( IN FEET )
1 inch - 30 ft.
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET 7 OF 8
OF THE 6TH P.M.,
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 6
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 6 ,� m m = m = m
■ ' 11.70'
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
44.00' S89°41'26"W 215.22'
Y R N4W cA m 7
o 4VX tiX Oo �. o 1,07 S.F. N
o.027 Ac. 2
rn " 5N 588'44'38"W 57.00' B Q m
F
#9388 W. 51 ST AVE.
C n 48947'26"E 293.15' 63' R.O.W. HEREBY o #9387 °N' 16
30.00' 0 263.75' DEDICATED a 0 7 ACS.Fo
o N 0027 Ac.
o M
BY THIS PLAT
888°4438"W 57.00
o 5' U E
TRACT Wa� m m ' CD
n " A 22,113 S.F. w 17 N
1,,57 S.F. 0 o h
0.59e Ac. N 0 027 AC V M W
44.00' 5.00' S89°41'26"W 211.85' CSS 588'44'38"W 57.00' W=
07U -5Ra 26.00' 20.65' 20.29' 20.29' 20.29 20.29' 20.65' 14.39'
A�4 TRACT X 534 S.F.0.012 AC. 0 3 'n O 18
5' UE O N N 1,262 S.F. N W
0 0 0 0.029 AC. o Q (�
J 589'41'26"W 56.65' N N N a J
=3.03' 588°44'38"W 57.00'
14.5' R.O.W. HEREBY 1 m m m E ci of U c5 o u' cv o U cv o o W �5 Z z
DEDICATED TO THE 1,177 S.F. 0 TRACTGG u� v, Q in Q via m PQ o 3 �O' x, o_ Q W
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE 3 0.027 AC. S� 290 S.F. via
BY THIS PLAT S89'41'26"W 57.00' 0.007 AC. 7 °' o -�' o '> 0 3 ^ 0 3 0 �I 3 ,n o 3 moo; m °' a '
o o o o a No n N"� r�i
TRACT IFF \ N 1,271 AC. N (�
� 0 r.� o �j 1,27, AC, N I
f5� U.E � � � � � ro �_ �o CO 0045 AC. N� �s
} N 2 N O III O O N M V L
I o 1,157 S F o 888°44'38"W 57.00' 1 Q
N o.ov Ac. o
z z z z
589°41'26"W 57.00' 26' U6, 5' UE�
60' EX. R.O.W. A.E. L=122' 855°5750"11 � �F- N 20
m �-20.65'- -?0.29'--20.29'- �19.0T- -L=20.73= 55 7 r'o 1,299 S,F, N
N ® 3 N N89°41'26"E 85.30' 7 55 1,204 S.F. O'F \2 5` - 0.030 AG
0 1,157 S.F. 0 �F� (1028 AC.
30' 30' 0.027 A%7.
C. N 5.00' 30' VWO., CF6 `5T E 29 0. S88°44'38 "W 57.00' F '
589°41'26"W 57.00' F.S.D. UE 50 TRACTVV-1608 S.F. o
BYSEPARATE 26' U.E., A.E. A 5'j N 0.014 AC. �� 0
5' UE L=5.41' C 5' UE 2 8' 26. 0'
DOCUMENT �2�� 555 1 V r7 7_34.6`
N 4 N TRACT 00 ,,271 aF. ,i 00 `-'o ZU G� L 488°44'38"E
20,401 S.F. S89°41'26"W 85.30' 0.029 AC. 0 6' �° /L 32 ga GC3 510.90'
w o 1,157 SE d C
0.027 Ao. N 0.458 AC. - 7g OE \ O -9
o o N .00� --- L=0.91' 5
z z 889'41'26"W 57.00' 589'41'26"W 57.00' �'� .54 9 8 ��
Qo U V " 55 1.ne sF. Do s8 �8 '- CAR
1 x027 AC. 54 8 ti 0-yAS' �� #9385
o w N 6 °J N F� 488°44'38"E
d z = 1,291 S.F. w 30' F. U. \ O 9 P O 2.
0 1,157 S.F. o N N
z o 3 N N 0.030 Ac. \ F-' `' 20 '` O 9 �� �� 554.64'
ov, o.027Ac. 5'UE BYSEPARATE V' V� 5X o'` 40 �-�s ! O 32°46'48"
z O 889°41'26"W 57.00' A 6 O 55 � 00�
�w o DOCUMENT \ 'L p. ,P��6, 5 E E 150
z N w S89'41'26"W 57.00' x E 50 R%
TRACT D 10 P
z in in N 31° 20,401 S. 2- WP 5 1,177 SE O
G N 2 N m \ Z d' '7 5
U "v N 1,2916 S.F. o N w N N 1,271 SF. cJ of TRACTHH F, �° 0.468 AC. o9; ss 5 0.027 AC, 5 EO YaS
Fl -N N N 0.029 AG N ro 7,6« S.F. O C" Q
v 0.030 AC. � Q '
0.175 AC. \ 1
oci
cQ1�I 589'41'26"W 57.00' X#9386 s89 4r2s"w 57.00' F, o �� 5,Rmsw
,.,1 n s.1,157 SFT 47 0
� o TRACTY o o ro-I b�ca A s L0.027 AC.
B o 969 S.F. o m 3 N S88°44'38"W 67.58' 06, \9
�� o N o 22.65' 22.29' 22.65' �. tW =4.69' ° 45
0.022 AC. o N 1,271 S.F. N o A ID' -o
0 U S89°41'26"W 57.00' z N 0.029 AC. \ �! Ate. 550 12 �' N
26' U.E.. 5 U.E 5' UE 0 \ 1,199 S.F. 5 F6
p j OC z� A.E. S89°41'26"W 57.00' o a Oo o F, tC 0.028 AGS 9' N
11� D_
(p 7
Q co = ruNio NUl �U Qcv r UO 1 S.Fa
0.030 ACN 1,914 SFcQv
V
13
� X 589°41'26"W 57.00' 2.450.030 ACN o 1,371 SFN�o DG
LJ 5' o N
o ,
0.031 AC. k0 VA 10,
m « =1036S
o`L
8 S89°41'26"W 56.88'
N E TRACT
DD
0 1,157 S.F. TRACT HH 1,122 S.F.
7WA57.00'10
p 7,6°' S.F.S U. E 0.026 AC.
089°4102
06 0.175 AC. _ X4.45,_
��.�9'65'-689' _---- -
14.5' R.O.W. HEREBY m \49.76-2�.65'-
9 401°15'22"W 588'44'38"W 74.23'
N S88'44'38"W 14424
DEDICATED TO THE 7.39
1,157 S.F.
I
I
w N 'CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE N 0.027 AC. S`I TRACT 30' vH1.G, uJ a
BY THIS PLAT S89°41'26"W 57.00' ESO. UE
20,401 S.F. BY SEPARATE - d PRIVATE ALLEY F
0.468 AC. '
DOCUMENT N N
N 10 N 5.09' '- W
0 1,157 S.F. 0 888°44'38"W 273.42'
N (.027 Ac. E - 20.65- -20.29' - -20.29'- 2029' - -20.29'- -20.64'- 14.00' -20.65- - - 20.29'- -20.29'- - - 20.29'- -20.29'- - - 20.65'- 9.41' W
T5' U E oLLJ
589°41'26"W 57.00' m L o m U _
�5' UE o m b 0 0 0 0 o O Q ' W
11 N S UE N 0 0 o Ucv Ucv Uci EU ¢ r i`Q ii via a L, vri via via ii viQ in Fob in
1,157 S.F. 1.2 o U d I� E o n Q vi Q ,n vi Q u� U 1 in < n U A N d.
0.027 AC. 6.31' vi Q irl U Q N vi F - r n n N 3 N 3 N W
I\ r N i cn N 3 cn N 7 in N 3 in o cn (n
�o �o N �o iv �o N N U0 ccj
N S89°41'26"W 57.00' TRACT AA 3 ^o N o iv 0 N 0 a 0 N O N N 0 N 0 N 0 N o N o ,N 0 uNi U- o E c
m
317 S F. _ N `r W
W �3
TEL
TRACTZ 0.007 AC. 0 o Z
293 S.F. 12 61. � o o o o o f o x o 0 f 8 N J
z z
0.007 AC. 2,467 S.F. o z 0 z O z5' UE L=3.64''
o LS 0.057 AQ 5' U.E -
0 L
- - - - - _ _ L
N J --- O O 29'
0 4 O ?9' O O G� , r,
20.65' 20."9 20.°9' 20."9' °0 °9' °0.6 1 .00' 0. 5' 0. 0. �0. 0.� 7.0 o /<
-1111-111A1 "I z-'
#9383
PT. NO. 13109
S 1T4 CORNER SEC. 17
FOUND 2" DIAMETER PIPE WITH
3-11.4" BRASS CAP
N RANGE BOX PLS 13212
STATE PLANE COOED
N: 1710537.5325 LOU 39'47'01.23408"N
E: 3101757.2008 LONG: 105°08'16.55364"W
WHEAT RIDGE DATUM
N: 710959.0338
E 102539.6519
� I
Ny11} j
- >O
K
w
N I
S88°44'38"W 1036.2
W. 50TH AVENUE
EX. 50' PUBLIC R.O.W.)
20' R.O.W. HEREBY
DEDICATED BY
THIS PLAT
1
i 1
L1
#9382 '
1
1
1
1
1
■
PROPOSED
KEY
CORD
MAP
TIONS
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 8130306502
SHEET 7 OF 8
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
SOUTHWEST PLAN
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
KEY MAP
LEGEND
J. E.
UTILITY EASEMENT
F.S.D.
FRUITDALE SANITARY DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
V.W.D.
VALLEY WATER DISTRICT UTILITY EASEMENT
A.E.
ACCESS EASEMENT / EMERGENCY ACCESS
EX U.E.
EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT
R.O.W.
RIGHT OF WAY
C25
SET 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" RED PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED LS N0, 34591
O
FOUND 18" LONG #5 REBAR & 1-1/4" ORANGE PLASTIC CAP
STAMPED LS NO. 25369
O
SET 30" LONG #6 REBAR & 2" ALUMINUM CAP
STAMPED LS NO. 34591
ZAF####
SET 3-1/4" BRASS CAP ON 30" LONG & 2-1/4"
DIAMETER ALUMINUM PIPE STAMPED LS NO. 34591. THE
NUMBER REPRESENTS THE CITY MONUMENT DESIGNATION.
87°26'50"
EASEMENT LINE
S24'1 0'06"W
TRACT AND LOT LINE
C27
BOUNDARY LINE
CURVE TABLE
CURVE NO.
RADIUS
DELTA
LENGTH
CHORD DIRECTION
CHORD LENGTH
C24
13.00'
89°02'43"
20.20'
N44°13'17"E
18.23'
C25
118-50'
18°12'14"
37.65'
S79°37'04"W
37.49'
C26
13.00'
87°26'50"
19.84'
S24'1 0'06"W
17.97'
C27
13.00'
90°00'00"
20.42'
S46'1 5'22"E
18.38'
C28
13.00'
90°57'17"
20.64'
N45°46'43"W
18.54'
C29
150.00'
2°47'31"
7.31'
N01°05'48"E
7.31'
LINE TABLE
LINE NO.
DIRECTION
LENGTH
L10
N88'41'31 "E
25.43'
L11
S01'1 5'20"E
5.50'
L12
N88°44'40"E
32.70'
L13
N88°44'38"E
26.00'
L14
N88°44'38"E
10.00'
L15
S01'1 5'22"E
9.00'
L16
N88°44'38"E
9.00'
L17
S01°1522"E
10.00'
GRAPHIC SCALE
30 0 30 60
( IN FEET )
1 inch - 30 ft.
THE RIDGE A T WARD STATION
A RESUBDIVISION OF A PART OF LOTS 13 AND 17, STANDLEY HEIGHTS,
BEING A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
SHEET 8 OF 8
MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 6
m T -T- m m m m m m m
16,878 S.F.
°57'32"E 518.08'
1.04' N88°44'38"E- 1.04' 588°44'3E
14'38"W 125.00'
11.00' 57.00' 26.00' 57.00' 11
N 12 O 717 N 1
1°91 SF N
N
'
355.95' 0.387 AC.
26.00
I
20.65'
22.29'
2229'
f5' UE
20.65'
N
15.22
-
47258
S.F.
-
o
'
0.027 A0,
5 UE
N88'44'38"E 59.60'
00'
119'
W. 51 ST AVE.
5' U E
°�
r7
63' R.O.W. HEREBY
4- - -
o
500'18'39'E
DEDICATED
TRACT U
0.027 AC.
'
BY THIS PLAT
G° /
I
f
16.82'
N F N
15,136 S.F.
0
g
PIP
N Na
282 S.F.
0.006 AS.
N
N 1,157 S.F.
0
0
N
0.347 AC.
0.027 AS.
d z
1
TRACT
m
U
° 8
1.04'
.NB8°44'38"E
1.04' 581
r
a
01,027 AC.
N
N
588°44'38"W 129.00'
26.00'
57.00'
U W
'
1,500 S.F. N
41 o S. F.
61.00'
a
11.00'
57.00'
I
o
I
N 0.030 AC.
6
AE
N
1,177 S.F.
1 3
DOCUMENT
�O
=6.72'
0.034 AC.
12 11
U-2
r,
588'44'38"W 57.00'
1
N
r N
co
1
N
3
m
7
1,177 S.F.
N
N
1,291 S.F.
N I
iv No
N No
�j
1,381 S.F.
N
o
N
0.027 AC,
I
N O
o
0.030 AC.
5'
'NED
5 U. E'er I
TRACT E-1
1,482 S
0.032 AC.
N o
I in
N o
N
N o
N
N
= o
26' UE,
cv
U a
0
cN�l
o
N
N
in
5' U E
�. 1J
s
-F.
0.034 AC.
z
1
588°44'38"W 57.00'
I
AE
I
588'44'38"W 57.00'
o
N
M
I
S88°44'38"W 61.00'
o�
�
U
-
m
a 1J
'
PRIVATE
z
I
m
a
m
N
=
2
Z
2
N
ALLEY G
0
1,157 S.F.
1 4
�, UE
0
1,157 S.F.
0
1,238 5,F.
o
N
0.027 AC.
>
i
0.027 AC.
1
N
0.028 AS.
22.Z9
I
26.00'
I
s' U.E
2229'
20.65'
588°44'38' 57.00'
15.22'
o Q o
20.65'
588°44'38"W 57.00'
�'
01
o
-� 11
S88°44'38"W 61.00'
0) �-
.19'
a,o
w o_
h
m.i
-
N
v vm
N
10
cC�
Q nN
3
y°
3
o<
N N
o
11157 S.F.
0.027 AS
>
0
1,157 S.F.
LL,
I 30' F. UE
0
1,238 S.F.
0-028 AC.
<N
d
N
0.027LL, AC.
N
RY SEPARATE
0.283 AC. �o
SSS°44'38"W 57.00'
I
N TRACT N
I
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
N
I
588'44'38"W 61.00'
o
N N
DOCUMENT
min
3,510 S.F. _uT
L1.1
'n
-
m
;n 117
N
9
0.081 AC. �
°N'
4
LJ,J
N
4
N:
0
1,157 S.F.
0 0
0
1,157 S.F.
O7
'
0
0
1,238 S.F.
o
a o
N
0.027 AC.
20.79'
z z
N
0.027 AC.
z
i
0.028 AC.
N
z z
s' U.E'y
I
I
r5' UE
L1J
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
588'44'38"W 57.00'
Z
588'44'38"W 61.00'
F
J
I
N
5
N
UN
0
8
1,157 SE
N
a
30' V. W.
IN5
o
1,157 S.F.
I
p
1,238 SF.
N
N
0.027 AC.
F.SD. U.E.
N
0.027 AC.
s' UE
L)
N
0.028 AC
5' U. E
BY SEPARATE
S88 -44'38"W 57.00
DOCUMENT
588'44'38"WQ 57.00'
S88'44'38"W 61.
vi a
I
6
6
rn coo
1.29' SJ`-
26' U.E,
o
1.171 SFE
'
O
I
1 1 1,259 S.F.
0.029 AC.
N
N
N O
N
0.030 AC.
i
/J,E
N
I
1 0.027 AC.
O
o
m
588°44'38"W 57.00'
588444'38"W 57.00'
b
61
588'44'38"W .00'
TRACT U-1
°57'32"E 518.08'
1.04' N88°44'38"E- 1.04' 588°44'3E
14'38"W 125.00'
11.00' 57.00' 26.00' 57.00' 11
N 12 O 717 N 1
1°91 SF N
N
LI?
109.00'
26.00
I
20.65'
22.29'
2229'
f5' UE
20.65'
N
15.22
-
1
S.F.
-
o
'
0.027 A0,
5 UE
N88'44'38"E 59.60'
'95O
119'
W. 51 ST AVE.
5' U E
°�
r7
63' R.O.W. HEREBY
4- - -
o
N 1,157 S.F.
DEDICATED
_
m
0.027 AC.
'
BY THIS PLAT
G° /
I
f
�I
N F N
.
10 TRACT II
0
g
PIP
N Na
282 S.F.
0.006 AS.
N
N 1,157 S.F.
0
°57'32"E 518.08'
1.04' N88°44'38"E- 1.04' 588°44'3E
14'38"W 125.00'
11.00' 57.00' 26.00' 57.00' 11
N 12 O 717 N 1
1°91 SF N
N
1 3
5
C2 2258'
26.00
I
20.65'
22.29'
2229'
f5' UE
20.65'
N
15.22
-
20.65
S.F.
-
o
Q
0.027 A0,
5 UE
N88'44'38"E 59.60'
'95O
119'
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
5' U E
°�
r7
10
N
o
N 1,157 S.F.
W �
N
0.027 AC.
N
1
G° /
I
3
�I
N F N
o
0
g
PIP
N Na
9
N
N 1,157 S.F.
0
0
N
o_ oNI
0.027 AS.
d z
1 m
TRACT
I
U
° 8
c5
588'44'38"W 57.00'
�i
r
a
01,027 AC.
N
N
5
' U.E
Ls'
6
U W
-8
588°4438W 57.00'
1,500 S.F. N
41 o S. F.
BY SEPARA TE
a
via
Nrn
co
W 7
E 1,291 S.F.
o
in O
N 0.030 AC.
6
AE
N
1,177 S.F.
1 3
DOCUMENT
�O
=6.72'
0.034 AC.
0.009 AS.
U-2
r,
588'44'38"W 57.00'
N
r N
AE
>'
Ln
3
m
3
588°44'38'W 65.32'
in
N I
iv No
N No
N o
-�'
f
f
O
N O
o
'NED
5 U. E'er I
TRACT E-1
1,482 S
i°
N o
I in
N o
N
N o
N
N
= o
N
cv
U a
0
cN�l
o
N
N
in
�. 1J
s
-F.
0.034 AC.
z
M
4
o N Q
2 N
a
o
N
M
o
�
o�
-
a 1J
1,274 s.F. a
0.029 AC.
PRIVATE
z
I
o
z
z
�o
O
Z
588°44'38"W 60.68'
ALLEY G
1 4
�, UE
22.Z9
I
26.00'
20.65'
22.29'
2229'
20.65'
15.22'
20.65'
o
-� 11
2
3 0.�9'
.19'
N
1,204 S.F.
z�
'
z y
0.028 AS.
588'44'38"W 58.41'
`J m
N
I 30' F. UE
TRACT E
12,321 S.F. E
PRIVATE
ALLEYK
.� o
RY SEPARATE
0.283 AC. �o
U 1
-9.99'
o
DOCUMENT
N
LLJ
4 N
LLI
1,181 S.F.
�
00 29'
20 29'
2029'
20.29
20.65'
10.00'
20.79'
°57'32"E 518.08'
1.04' N88°44'38"E- 1.04' 588°44'3E
14'38"W 125.00'
11.00' 57.00' 26.00' 57.00' 11
N 12 O 717 N 1
1°91 SF N
N
1 3
1,177 S.F. c
N
I
0.027 AC.
F26'
A. E-..
57.00'
f5' UE
N
S88" 4'38"W 57.00'
c
-
N
S.F.
N 1,157 S.F.
o
Q
0.027 A0,
5 UE
~
~
0 0
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
o
°�
r7
10
N
a
N 1,157 S.F.
W �
N
0.027 AC.
N
O
a
P
I
3
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
N F N
N N
�a
N Na
9
N
N 1,157 S.F.
0
0
N
o_ oNI
0.027 AS.
d z
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
o
U
° 8
N
588'44'38"W 57.00'
0.081 AC.
N
F
01,027 AC.
N
N
5
' U.E
Ls'
6
U W
-8
588°4438W 57.00'
I
I
0.027 AC.
5'UE
BY SEPARA TE
30' VWD.,
N
Nrn
co
W 7
E 1,291 S.F.
o
in O
N 0.030 AC.
6
AE
N
1,177 S.F.
1 3
DOCUMENT
�O
0.027 AC.
S88' 4'38"W 57.00'
TRACT
U-2
r,
rn
1 3
0.030 AC.
U. E,
I
0
F26'
A. E-..
57.00'
588'44'38"W 57.00'
N
2
0.027 AC.
s' uE--
S.F.
F
�
001.157
a.az7 Aa5' UE -
'0
~
588°44'38"W 57.00'
0 0
�
o
0 0
F
3
M } rn
o
1,157 S.F.
W �
N
0.027 Ac.
J
a �I
O
a
P
I
588'44'38"W 57.00'
N w N
N F N
�a
N
4
5' UE
Q
C w o
0
1,157 S.F.
d z
0.027 AS,
NN �
f5' UE
TRACT
3,510 S.F.
N
588'44'38"W 57.00'
0.081 AC.
m
3 no
u�No
N
5
30' VWD.,
6
1,157 S.F.
F. SD. U. E.
I
I
0.027 AC.
5'UE
BY SEPARA TE
30' VWD.,
N
No
��
588'44'38"W 57.00'
DOCUMENT
26' UE,
N �O
6
AE
N
1,177 S.F.
1 3
DOCUMENT
�O
0.027 AC.
�
26' U. E,
�O N
r,
588'44'38"W 57.00'
rn
1 3
M
N
0.027 AS.
0
4'38"W
57.00'
11
1,157 OF,
0.027 AC.
s' uE--
57.00'
M
J
TRACT U
15,136 S.F.
0.347 AC.
r7
U
a
12
1 3
1,177 S.F.
N
0.027 AS.
0 1,157 S.F.
4'38"W
57.00'
11
1,157 OF,
0.027 AC.
s' uE--
4'38"W 57.00'
10
1,157 S.F.
0.027 AC.
m
AE
u 9
N
0 1,157 S.F.
0
0 o
N 0.027 AC.
N
W
57.00'
I
J
'0
~
�F.o
a
a
o
o
F
NC.
<
R
a
�Q
o
- a
E457
57.00'N.F.AC.
u
O
a
P
I
w
�
�a
Q
5' UE
Q
S88°44'38"W 57.00'
TRACT
w
U-3
45.35'
- - - N 88'44' 38"E
W. 51 ST AVE.
63' R.O.W. HEREBY
DEDICATED
BY THIS PLAT
AE
Q 12,321 S.F. '60
I
N
W
I
I
I
J
'0
�
bz
a
a
o
o
w
F
<
R
a
�Q
o
- a
O
u
O
a
P
I
w
�
�a
Q
Q
N
TRACT H
w
rn
3,510 S.F.
NN �
a r
0.081 AC.
N
N a
o
�N
3 no
u�No
I
o
O
0
�Nro
i
m
N
3
N
I
I
3
0
30' VWD.,
N
No
��
N
ESD. U6
N �O
N �O
BY SEPARATE
DOCUMENT
�O
N
�
26' U. E,
�O N
U
N
in
N
AE
Ln
o
O
I
W. 51 ST AVE.
63' R.O.W. HEREBY
DEDICATED
BY THIS PLAT
44'38"W
20.00'
W TRACT E o 0
Q 12,321 S.F. '60
0283 AC.
20.79' 10.00' 20.79' 20.35' 20.35 20.35' 20.35' 250'
J
0
0
'0
K
bz
a
o
0
0
Q
o
Q
a
�Q
o
- a
u
O
a
P
LO
�a
�a
�a
Q
N
wLT
��a
r�
NN �
3
m�
3
rN
�N
3 no
u�No
3 ,moo
o
O
�Nro
,nN
-O
3
N
nN
3
ro
N
N
No
��
N
No
�O
N �O
N �O
N
�O
N
�O
N
�O N
U
N
in
N
Ln
O
in
in
ui a
f
f
f
o
m
o
rn o
a o
_
0
o
o
f
f
o
o
L5'uE
O
26' A. E
z
z
4
-
44'38"W
20.00'
W TRACT E o 0
Q 12,321 S.F. '60
0283 AC.
20.79' 10.00' 20.79' 20.35' 20.35 20.35' 20.35' 250'
J
0
0
K
I rn 0.027 AC. 25.00 X3.41 Y
S88°44'38"W 58.14' Y 5' U.E. o o N
o TRACT E-2 0 L5' UE o 0 o U o 0 0o a o 0 o N
W, m O 520 S.F. o o F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¢ o o U E E r U r U O
0 a
W mN 0.012 AC. No 0 0 0 o o U o U r a r a N a Wa a
6 N O o o U c3 G - w U w cv - a N ui a in ui a in F �n vi �n vi o vi a
N 1,320 S.F. o L13 LL cv LL cJ " c3 " " a a in u� ui a �n ui a �n via u� O O O r O rn N o 0
' m --_-- uc via uc via �n via in vi vi F O� Or ins 'nN �N 3 wN 3 coN 3 coN 3 coo am
w 0.030 AC. in vi a o o N N 3 3 m 3 � O o o rn
LJ.I - vi _ ^ �n 'nN 3 coN 3 coN 3 coN 3 co roo �o �o N N N �o 'n coO
NN L12 w nrq 3 iiN 3 uNio 3 wo 3 1170 3 �0 3 3 roo N O , �o N �o N �o N �d N UQ N �o N �o N �o N �o N �o N �o
Z if] E- .76 I+10 �O N _ N N �O N N �O �O N �O N N u� N
J, L1 0 o N o N o N o N o N o N N U Q N N in in o in f m o rn o o N o N o N o N
I m .71' 6 0�' o N r ori M a o o 0 0 o n o 0 0 0
(� 6.00' L15 2,300 SE r m o rn o 0 5 B i o o o z
L14 TRACT MM 0.053 AS. n 6 O z z `n o 5' Uz
z z
z
�' L16 244 5-F. 1 5 �5 U -E �- -
0.006 AC. j_
E .3 _35' ° .35' 2 .35' 2 .79 0.0 20. 9' 20. 5' °0. "0.3 50' 0.
' CES J 6 14' °3. 1' °0'9' 20.29 20 °9' 20.'9' 20. 5' 10 00' ' .7 ' 588°44'38W 54286'
20' R.O.W. HEREBY
20' R.O.W. HEREBY DEDICATED BY
6.00' THIS PLAT
DEDICATED BY
' THIS PLAT
1
1
1
1
S88°44'38"W 1036.22'
W. 50TH AVENUE
(EX. 50' PUBLIC R.O.W.)
1
9,784 S.F.
0-225 AC.
} Q
Awa
Ir
W }
CIDOxp o
O O I-<-
- ro
Z IY
Lu
� p
n
� p
45' R. 0.. W
SII
o W 0L
3 W }
o O 2 CO
0 0
o Z § UJ
OOQ
z 0LL)
0
NW
c p
#9381
i
03
i�
0
0
U)
SHEET 8 OF 8
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
SOUTHEAST PLAN
ENGINEER/SURVEYOR
kvA
10333 E. Dry Creek Rd.
Suite 240
Englewood, CO 80112
Tel: (720) 482-9526
CONSULTANTS CVLINC.NET
THE RIDGE AT WARD STATION J.N. 81 30 306 508
♦�4le
Wh6atRiLd e
g
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission MEETING DATE: April 4, 2019
CASE MANAGER: Scott Cutler
CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-18-25 & WZ-18-26 / Ames Partners PRD
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential
Development with approval of an Outline Development Plan (ODP) and
Specific Development Plan (SDP) for the development of two duplexes.
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3330 Ames (Northeast corner of W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street)
APPLICANT/OWNER (S): Ames Partners LLC (Jay Feaster)
APPROXIMATE AREA: 18,762 square feet (0.43 acres)
PRESENT ZONING: Residential -Three (R-3)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood Buffer Area
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
Location Map
era
4 1 F
i N
F
Planning Commission 1
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
Site
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this
case.
I. REQUEST
Case No. WZ-18-25 is an application for approval of a zone change with an Outline Development Plan
(ODP) and Specific Development Plan (SDP) for property located at the northeast corner of W. 33`d
Avenue and Ames Street. The purpose of the request is to change the zoning from Residential -Three
(R-3) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) to allow for the construction of two duplexes.
Rezoning to a planned development in the City of Wheat Ridge entails approval of two documents.
The first is the Outline Development Plan (ODP). The approval of the ODP changes the zoning
designation on the land, establishes allowed uses and development standards for the property, and
establishes access configurations for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles. The second document is the
Specific Development Plan (SDP), which focuses on specific details of a development such as site
design, architecture, landscaping, and drainage design. The SDP must be found to be compliant with
the ODP in order to be approved. Case No. WZ-18-26 is the application for approval of the SDP.
Section 26-302 of the Municipal Code allows for concurrent or sequential applications for the ODP
and SDP. In this case, the applicant is requesting concurrent review of the ODP and SDP. Because of
this, the City Council is the final approving body for both documents.
In addition, a minor subdivision plat is being processed for the site, Case No. MS -18-07, which is
required to be reviewed by Planning Commission. The plat is currently under review by staff and will
track behind the ODP/SDP in public hearings; Planning Commission will review the plat at a later
hearing after City Council has reviewed the zone change request.
II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY
The subject property is located in southeast Wheat Ridge, on the northeast corner of W. 33`d Avenue at
Ames Street. Sheridan Boulevard is located half a block to the east. The site is vacant and was
previously owned by the apartment building to the north �, M. Ownership of the subject
property has transferred several times in recent years. The site consists of four lots: two developable
parcels and two tracts for the vacated alley between Ames Street and Sheridan Boulevard.
The property is zoned Residential -Three (R-3), which permits medium to high-densit residential
development, ranging from single-family to multi -unit developments (Exhibit 2, Zon). Lots to
the north and south (across W. 33`d Avenue) are also zoned R-3. Much of the surrounding
neighborhood, including the lots directly across Ames Street, are zoned Residential -One C (R -1C),
which permits small -lot single-family homes. The senior living facility to the east of the property is
zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
As stated above, the subject property is vacant. The lot was platted as part of a Resubdivision of Block
5 Columbia Heights in 1945. Both sides of the alleyway were vacated over time, including the east
side of the alley in 1957. No alley exists currently, though the lots remain.
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
Under the current zoning, the site can be developed with up to five residential units; the code allows
one unit for every 3,630 square feet of land area. In recent years, staff has reviewed applications from
prior property owners that included townhome development. The current property owner is proposing
four (4) units as part of two (2) duplexes. Because the duplexes would be detached and require separate
lots, each duplex lot would need to meet the minimum R-3 size and width standards. These standards
are presented in the table below:
R-3 Development Standards
Minimum lot area
Minimum lot width
Single-family
7,500 sf
60' *
Duplex
9,000 sf
75' *
Multifamily (3+ units)
12,500 sf
1001*
* Corner lots must be at least 80 feet wide on both street frontages
The subject property has 124.25 feet of frontage along Ames Street and 151 feet of frontage along
W. 33`d Avenue for a total area of 18,762 square feet. The overall area would allow for two duplex lots
and the proposed four units is within R-3 density standards. However, the dimensions of the property
cannot meet minimum lot width requirements for two duplex lots and a simple replat would result in
several variances. For these reasons, the applicant has proposed a rezoning to Planned Residential
Development.
III. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Attached is a copy of the proposed Outline Development Plan for the site, which contains two sheets
(Exhibit 3, Outline Development Plan). The first page is a cover page with certification and signature
blocks for the property owners, Planning Commission, City Council, and the Mayor. There is also a
character of development statement, list of permitted uses, and other standard notes. The second page
includes the conceptual layout of the property, including driveways and building orientation.
Allowable Uses
Uses permitted per the ODP are duplexes, single family homes, and accessory uses (home occupations
and household pets). Detached accessory structures such as sheds and gazebos are also permitted.
Development Standards
In general, the development standards follow the R-3 standards with some modifications to
accommodate smaller lot development and in response to the surrounding multi -family, institutional,
and small lot single family uses. In the spirit of providing a high quality development through a PRD,
the project proposes reduced building height, increased open space, and architectural standards.
Size, Setback, Lot Coverage — The ODP calls for the following development standards which
vary slightly from R-3 as noted in the table:
Standard
Proposed
Compared to R-3
Minimum Lot Size
8,450 square feet
550 sf less
Minimum Lot Width
53 feet
22-27 feet less
Maximum Building Coverage
40%
Same
Front setback (Ames Street)
25 feet
Same
Side setbacks
8 feet
2 feet less
Rear setback
5 feet
5 feet less
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
Density — The proposed density is 9.29 units per acre, which is less than the current R-3 zoning
which allows up to 12 units per acre, and far less than the maximum for Planned
Developments, which is 21 units per acre. The applicant would be allowed up to 5 units under
the R-3 zoning, but has proposed 4 units in the ODP/SDP. Duplexes are an appropriate land use
situated between multi -family, institutional, and small lot single-family uses.
• Parking —The ODP states all parking shall be in conformance with Section 26-501 of the City
Code. For two-family residential (duplexes), 2 off-street spaces per dwelling unit must be
provided. Both Ames Street and W. 33`d Avenue also allow public street parking. The applicant
has proposed on-site parking be in the form of detached garages.
• Building height— Maximum building height is limited to 29 feet, which is lower than the City's
standard 35 -foot height limit. This effectively limits the structure to a two-story home.
Detached garages are limited to 15 feet in height, which is consistent with other residential
zone districts.
• Architecture — The ODP proposes a traditional architectural design and states that the duplexes
will be two stories, with vertical and horizontal wood siding, asphalt shingle pitched roofs, and
covered front porches. The City does not have architectural standards for single-family homes
or duplexes.
• Access —Vehicular access is to be gained from a single access point from W. 33`d Avenue into
a private rear driveway, where the garages can be accessed. The fronts of the duplexes will face
Ames Street.
• Open space — All landscaping and open space requirements shall conform with Section 26-502
of the Municipal Code. However, the applicant has proposed an increased minimum
landscaping requirement of 40%, up from the Code -required 25%.
• Code compliance — In all other areas, the project is proposed to comply with the zoning code
including lighting, fencing, streetscape design, and setback encroachments.
IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA
Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-303.D. The Planning
Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following
criteria have been met:
1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and
will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area.
The proposed development is a compatible land use and density with the surrounding land uses,
and the investment contributes to a variety of housing types in the area. The zoning and new
housing stock will likely add value to the area The site design, setbacks, reduced building heights,
and enhanced open space will add visual interest.
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
The Planned Residential Development zoning is expected to have a positive impact on the
neighborhood from a property value perspective. The proposed zoning complies with safety and
access requirements of the fire district. The project will not result in significant adverse effects on
the surrounding area. The proposed duplex zoning arguably provides a more compatible land use
for the area than alternatives allowed under the current R-3, such as a five -unit townhome
development.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
2. The development proposed on the subject property is not feasible under any other zone
district, and would require an unreasonable number of variances or waivers and conditions.
The current R-3 zoning would allow up to 5 attached townhome units on the property, and because
the W. 33`d Avenue frontage is wider, they would likely face that direction. Multifamily in R-3 is
allowed on sites larger than 12,500 square feet and 100 feet wide, which the property exceeds, and
1 unit per 3,630 square feet of land area is allowed. However, the applicant desires a duplex
construction type to reduce the impact and scale of the development (Exhibit 8, .WcantLetter).
In R-3, duplexes require 9,000 square feet of lot area each, with 75 feet of lot width. Although
overall site area is sufficient for two duplexes at 18,762 square feet, the site is too narrow to
facilitate two duplex lots, at 148 feet along W. 33`d Avenue and 124.25 feet along Ames Street. The
required water quality area also requires the reduction of overall lot sizes since water quality areas
are required to be in separate unbuildable tracts. Developing two duplexes under the R-3 standards
would require lot width variances, plus lot size variances since the water quality tract is subtracted
from the duplex lot areas. Therefore, the PRD zoning is necessary to avoid an unreasonable
number of variances.
The density proposed is one unit less than what would be allowed under the R-3 zoning, but the
R-3 zoning does not accommodate the smaller lot and smaller scale construction that is proposed.
Given the proposed use, the surrounding conditions, the requirement for a water quality tract, and
the surrounding conditions, the PRD zoning is the most appropriate zone change option. It will also
allow the applicant to commit to enhanced architecture and landscaping not normally required in
other zone districts, including R-3.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
3. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the
change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are
under capacity.
All of the service providers and utility districts have indicated that they have no concerns with the
proposal and have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at the
developer's expense. The development of the site will require upgrades to the sidewalks and curb
ramp along the street frontages of the site.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
4. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one 1 of the following conditions
exists:
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with
the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other
related policies or plans for the area.
Envision Wheat Ridge, the City's 2009 comprehensive plan, is organized around six key values,
one of which is to "promote vibrant neighborhoods and an array of housing options." With
single family homes, mid-century apartments, and age -restricted facilities; the area already has
a diversity of housing options. The provision of a duplex introduces a complementary option
that reflects this key value of the comprehensive plan.
Within Envision Wheat Ridge, the Structure Plan map provides high-level guidance for
achieving the City's vision by designating development priorities and future land areas
4, Comprehensive Plan). The "neighborhood buffer" designation encompasses the east side of
Ames Street between W. 26a' Avenue and W. 41' Avenue, parallel to Sheridan Boulevard. The
west side of Ames is designated "neighborhood." The neighborhood buffer area encourages
improvement of underutilized properties, including a mix of residential uses. The proposed
zone change is consistent with the neighborhood buffer designation, and the duplex project
supports the City's stated goals of increasing options for homeownership and attracting a range
of household types. It will also act as a transition from the higher -intensity Sheridan Boulevard
to the lower -intensity single-family uses to the east and south. Lastly, it will facilitate
development of a long -vacant lot.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City
of Wheat Ridge is in error.
Staff finds no evidence of an error on the official zoning maps.
Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable.
c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is
in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing
character of the area.
The area has long included a mix of housing types, ages, and densities. The investments and
changes complement the diversity of land uses in the area and strengthen the residential market.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was
not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive
plan.
Staff finds no evidence of an unanticipated need. The proposed zone change responds directly
to goals identified in the comprehensive plan.
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable.
Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request.
V. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Attached is a copy of the proposed Specific Development Plan (SDP), which includes nine sheets
regarding site design, building design, and landscaping (Exhibit 5, Specific Development Plan). In
addition to the standard certification and signature blocks, the site data table confirms the SDP
complies with the development standards provided by the ODP. Key components of the site design are
described below.
Site Design
The duplex buildings are proposed to face Ames Street, which matches the existing conditions in the
neighborhood. Detached garages will be provided for each unit, with a private walkway from the
duplex unit through a private yard to the garage. The garages will be accessed from a private driveway
on the east side of the site, off of W. 33`d Avenue. Yards will be fenced, providing privacy for the
residents and also for the neighboring properties. New sidewalks will be constructed on the property
frontage, with a new curb ramp at the corner of W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street to meet ADA
requirements. The setbacks on both streets are context appropriate, attempting to match the
surrounding conditions.
Architecture
The City does not have architectural requirements for single or two-family buildings, which includes
duplexes. However, the applicant has proposed enhanced architecture, with vertical board and batten
siding, grey asphalt shingles, and variations in siding patterns on the side fagades. Each unit will have a
covered porch. The detached garages will match the duplexes in color and materials. The duplexes will
be two stories with pitched roofs in a more traditional or farmhouse style.
Landscaping
The ODP requires each lot to be at least 40% landscaped. The SDP proposes each lot to be 41.48%
landscaped, with additional landscaping to be provided in the water quality area at the north of the site.
A total of 4 street trees are provided, plus 17 shrubs, and 46 ornamental grasses. Each duplex will have
a landscaped front yard and private rear yard with a concrete patio and sod yard.
Drainage
Drainage is accommodated in a water quality area on its own tract at the north of the site, between the
northern duplex and the neighboring property. This area will contain irrigated turf, sod, and rock
mulch, as well as plantings on the east side. The area is sized sufficiently for the added impervious
surface on the site, and acts as an additional buffer between the proposed development and the
apartment building to the north. Based on the total area of impervious surface being less than 10,000
square feet, full -flood attenuation is not required.
VI. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA
Criteria for the review of SDP documents is provided in Section 26-305.D. Staff has provided analysis
of these criteria below. Planning Commission shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to
which the criteria have been met.
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
1. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned
development as stated in section 26-301 of the zoning and development code.
The purpose of utilizing planned development zoning is to provide flexibility while
accommodating well-designed, innovative developments that demonstrate efficient use of land and
may not be feasible under a standard zone district. The SDP achieves these goals and proposes
unique duplexes with an emphasis on enhanced landscaping and architecture.
Staff has concluded that the SDP is consistent with these goals by adding to the diversity of
housing types in Wheat Ridge, while maintaining the overall character of the neighborhood
through smaller building footprints and two-story buildings.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
2. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the design intent or purpose of the
approved outline development plan
The SDP is consistent with the intent and character statements of the outline development plan.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
3. The proposed uses indicated in the specific development plan are consistent with the uses
approved by the outline development plan.
The proposed uses in the SDP are identical to those of the outline development plan.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
4. The site is appropriately designed and it consistent with the development guidelines
established in the outline development plan.
The SDP is consistent with the development guidelines of the outline development plan in all
respects including related to height, density, setbacks, parking, landscaping, fencing, and building
design.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
5. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the subject property, or the applicant
will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity.
All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at
the developers' expense.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
6. The proposed specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable
standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual, Streetscape Design Manual,
and other applicable design standards.
The proposed SDP is in conformance with the design standards established in the ODP.
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
Because both W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street are classified as local streets, the Streetscatie
Design Manual does not apply. However, the sidewalks and curb ramp are being upgraded to the
City's standard for local streets, and landscaping is being provided along the street frontage in
excess of zoning code requirements.
Staff concludes that this criterion has been met.
Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate the SDP support the request.
VII. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING & PUBLIC INPUT
Pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Code of Laws, the applicant notified all property owners and
residents within 600 feet of the site of the neighborhood meeting. Neighborhood meetings are required
prior to submittal of an application for a zone change.
The neighborhood input meeting was held on November 8, 2018. Two (2) members of the public
attended the meeting in addition to the applicant and staff. A full summary of the meeting is attached
in Exhibit 7, Neighborhood Meering Notes.
Public noticing is required prior to public hearings. As of the date of this publication, staff received
one (1) phone call about the application, with a message of support. If any comments are provided
prior to the Planning Commission public hearing on April 4, they will be entered into the record and
distributed to Commissioners at the public hearing.
VIII. AGENCY REFERRAL
All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and regarding
the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow:
Wheat Ridge Public Works: No concerns with the ODP/SDP. The subdivision plat and civil
construction plans are under review and must be approved prior to application for building
permit.
West Metro Fire Protection District: No comments or concerns; access is sufficient.
Wheat Ridge Water District: No comments, can serve.
Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: No objections, can serve.
Xcel Energy: No objections. Utility coordination is ongoing.
Century Link: No objections.
IX. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff has concluded that the proposed rezoning and Outline Development Plan are consistent with the
zone change criteria and the Specific Development Plan is consistent with the planned development
regulations, with the goals and policies of the City's guiding documents, and with the ODP. Because
Planning Commission
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
the requirements for an ODP/SDP have been met and the review criteria support the ODP/SDP, a
recommendation for approval is given.
X. SUGGESTED MOTIONS — ZONE CHANGE (ODP)
Option A:
"I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-18-25, a request for approval of a zone change
from Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development with an Outline Development Plan
(ODP) for property located at the northeast corner of W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street, for the
following reasons:
1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community
and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area.
2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's
Comprehensive Plan.
3. The proposed zoning is consistent with the intent of a planned development, compatible with
surrounding land uses, and will result in a high-quality development.
4. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request.
Option B:
"I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-18-25, a request for approval of a zone change from
Residential -Three (R-3) to Planned Residential Development with an Outline Development Plan
(ODP) for property located at the northeast corner of W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street, for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3. ...
XI. SUGGESTED MOTIONS — SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Option A:
"I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WS -18-26, a request for approval of a Specific
Development Plan on property located at the northeast corner of W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street, for
the following reasons:
1. The specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development, as
stated in Section 26-301 of the City Code.
2. The specific development plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the outline
development plan.
3. The proposed uses are consistent with those approved by the outline development plan.
4. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property with improvements
installed at the developer's expense.
5. The specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set
forth in the outline development plan and with the City's adopted codes and policies.
(Option B on next page)
Planning Commission 10
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
Option B:
"I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WS- 18-26, a request for approval of a Specific
Development Plan on property located at the northeast corner of W. 33`d Avenue and Ames Street, for
the following reasons:
1.
2.
Planning Commission 11
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL
City of
Wheatl d e t -
Geographic
Information Systems
Legend..
Q Subject Property
t i
q
Fl `MIN,
A I',
Cal
- r
ilJ
f~ ! I F
V
I
I'C ,
a � �
,.:�.
33RD AVE
Rt. brdaeacaoramala Roia�ra :�N
�' • H D83 Zone
D.M.OeWm: NAa83
.. _ t .,'- mow`` , • .. __._. .._..
Planning Commission 12
Case Nos. WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-261Ames Partners Duplexes
EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP
Planning Commission 13
Case Nos. WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-261Ames Partners Duplexes
EXHIBIT 3: OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Attached as an 11x17 document on the following page.
Planning Commission 14
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, MICHAEL D. MILLER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE
BOUNDARY OF THE OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS MADE BY ME OR
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,
INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO
STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN
ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
MICHAEL D. MILLER, PLS
COLORADO LICENSE NUMBER 38111
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 10 AND 11, TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 1/2 OF THE VACATED ALLEY
ADJOINING SAID LOTS, A RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 5 OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE / UNIFIED CONTROL STATEMENT
THE BELOW SIGNED OWNER(S) OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENTS THEREOF,
DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL
BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN, AND AS MAY
OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY LAW, I (WE) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE
APPROVAL OF A REZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND APPROVAL OF
THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY
RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-121 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF
LAWS.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
JAY FEASTER, FOR AMES PARTNERS LLC
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON )
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
DAY OF A.D. 20BY
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
NOTARY PUBLIC
ODP NOTE:
THIS OUTLINE DEVEOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC
DEVELOPMENT ELEMENTS SUCH AS SITE LAYOUT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE
HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC
DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF
WEHAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF A RIGHT—OF—WAY OR BUILDING
PERMIT APPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT.
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON )
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT
GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK M.
ON THE DAY OF 20_ A.D., IN
BOOK PAGE , RECEPTION NO.
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
BY:
(DEPUTY)
VICINITY MAP
ARCHITECTURE
fIE916ARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
oW'
m
W¢�
z
�
LL
Q
�
w
w
O
M
W
2
C
c
Q
O
o
M
g
m
CT LO
TION
2s
z�n zPROJ
zIVY):
ErA"..'
Jo
>
3
33RD AVE
w
�
FF
0
Fz 0
w
o
w
z
Q
lwi a
U
m
32ND AVE
z
R
30TH AVE
29TH AVE
(1)
NORTH
VICINITY MAP — NOT TO SCALE
CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOOD:
THE AMES PARTNERS DUPLEXES COMPLIES DIRECTLY WITH
THE WHEAT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY PRESERVING
AND ENHANCING THE NEIGHBORHOOD, PROVIDING HOUSING
DIVERSITY, AND ENHANCING COMMUNITY CHARACTER. THE
PROJECT IS PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY, CLEARLY DEFINES
PEDESTRIAN AND PARKING AREAS, AND WILL BE VISUALLY
ATTRACTIVE USING WELL—THOUGHT OUT LANDSCAPING,
FACADES, STREET PRESENCE, AND APPROPRIATELY SCALED
RESIDENCES. ARCHITECTURE WILL BE TRADITIONAL AND WILL
FEATURE COVERED FRONT PORCHES, VERTICAL AND
HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING, OPEN REAR PATIOS, CEDAR
FENCES, ASPHALT SHINGLE SLOPED ROOFS, AND A HIGH
LEVEL OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY NOT TYPICALLY FOUND
ON PRODUCTION HOMES. EACH UNIT FEATURES 3
BEDROOMS, 3 BATHROOMS, AND EXCLUSIVE OWN 2—CAR
GARAGES, DETACHED FROM THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS, ACCESSED FROM THE ALLEY. THE PROJECT WILL
REQUIRE A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3 TO PRD.
PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS DAY OF 20_
BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION.
CHAIRPERSON
CITY CERTIFICATION:
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
RIDGE CITY COUNCIL.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
ALLOWED USES:
ALLOWED USES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
PRIMARY USES:
• SINGLE FAMILY
• DUPLEXES
ACCESSORY USES:
• HOME OCCUPATIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 26-613 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS.
• HOUSEHOLD PETS, LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 3 DOGS AND 4 CATS.
DETACHED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (SHEDS, GAZEBOS) ARE PERMITTED.
20_ BY THE WHEAT
MAYOR
LAND USE TABLE:
TOTAL LOT SIZE: 18,762 SF
MAX. BUILDING COVERAGE: 7,505 SF (40%)
MIN. LANDSCAPING: 7,505 SF (40%)
TOTAL DWELLING UNITS: 4 UNITS
DWELLING UNITS/ACRE: 9.29
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:
1. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 8,450 SQUARE FEET
2. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 53 FEET
3. MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: 40%
4. MAXIMUM DENSITY: 4 UNITS WITHIN TWO BUILDINGS.
5. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 29' FEET
6. SETBACKS:
a. MINIMUM SETBACK ALONG AMES STREET: 25'
b. MINIMUM SETBACK ALONG 33RD AVENUE: 8'
c. MINIMUM NORTH PROPERTY LINE SETBACK: 8'
d. MINIMUM EAST PROPERTY LINE SETBACK: 5'
e. MINIMUM INTERNAL SIDE SETBACK: 5'
f. BUILDING SETBACK ENCROACHMENTS ARE PERMITTED IN CONFORMANCE
WITH SECTION 26-611 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL CODE.
7. PARKING: ALL PARKING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION
26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS.
a. DETACHED GARAGES ARE ALLOWED (20'X21', EAST PORTION OF LOT,
ALLEY LOADED, MAX HEIGHT OF 15—FEET)
8. LANDSCAPING: ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH
SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS (REQUIRED
MINIMUM LANDSCAPING IS 40% PER THIS ODP).
9. EXTERIOR LIGHTING: ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH
SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS.
10. SIGNAGE: ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII
(SIGN CODE) OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS.
11. FENCING: ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION
26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS.
12. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN: (2) TWO—FAMILY (DUPLEX) RESIDENTIAL
STRUCTURES, TWO STORIES, WITH VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL WOOD
SIDING, ASPHALT SHINGLE PITCHED ROOFS, COVERED FRONT PORCHES,
CONCRETE REAR PATIOS, SIDE & REAR GRASS YARDS.
PHASING:
THIS PROJECT IS ANTICIPATED TO HAVE ONLY ONE PHASE. HOWEVER,
FUTURE PHASING, IF REQUIRED, WILL NOT REQUIRE AMENDMENT TO
THIS PLAN.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 10 AND 11, TOGETHER WITH THE 1/2 OF THE VACATED ALLEY
ADJOINING SAID LOTS, A RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 5 OF COLUMBIA
HEIGHTS, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
THE EAST 1/2 OF THE VACATED ALLEY ADJOINING LOTS 12 AND 13, A
SUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 5 COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, AS VACATED BY
INSTRUMENT RECORDED JULY 1ST 1957 IN BOOK 1068 PAGE 60,
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.
PROJECT INFORMATION:
OWNER/DEVELOPER/BUILDER:
AMES PARTNERS, LCC
JAY FEASTER
19510 W. 55TH PLACE
GOLDEN, COLORADO 80403
720-691-7916
ARCHITECT:
FIEBIG ARCHITECTURE, PLLC
MICHAEL FIEBIG
906 TIMBERVALE TRAIL
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129
303-594-7584
ODP SHEET INDEX:
ODP -1 — COVER SHEET
ODP -2 — ODP SITE PLAN
CASE HISTORY:
WZ-18-25
WZ-18-26
MS -18-07
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/26/2019
REVISIONS:
ODP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
COVER SHEET
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
ODP -1
ARCHITECTURE
fIE916ARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
W¢�
z
�
LL
Q
V�/J)Lu
N
M
�
M
M
T
W
W
�
Er
Q
w
O
M
W
2
C
c
Q
O
o
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/26/2019
REVISIONS:
ODP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
COVER SHEET
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
ODP -1
U_
I
z
2
FN
W
I
0
Z
OH
aZ
M W i
I
N 6 y
lZa
W
0
0
W Y
M O
I g�
��W
d y
0
• `U
M y m6
W W
0 N
to
0 Y
M}a
I �
OD WO W
N
N
0
W Y
M o <
CL
0 LL,
W
CL
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CIN OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 10 AND 11, TOGETHER WITH THE WEST 1/2 OF THE VACATED ALLEY
ADJOINING SAID LOTS. A RESUBDIVISION OF BLOCK 5 OF COLUMBIA HEIGHTS.
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
4.8' I
ronur crTo�rv. nc_n• (4'-9 3/4")
33RD AVE (60 -FT R.O.W.)
LEGEND:
PROPERTY/LOT LINE
SEMACK/ZONE LOT
DEPTH (SEE CALLOUTS)
8' CEDAR FENCE
CONCRETE
PONDWATER
RE:ACMLCONTROL
I
ADJACENT ZONING:
N -C (ASSISTED
LIVING FACILITY)
SITE PLAN
SCALE 3/32"=1'-0"
NORTH
FIERIG
ARCHITECTURE
fIE916ARCH.COM
ADJACENT ZONING: R-3
U
�
J
w
W¢�
z
�
LL
Q
V�/J)Lu
N
M
�
M
M
T
W
W
�
Er
Q
Lu
NORTH
FIERIG
ARCHITECTURE
fIE916ARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
W¢�
z
�
LL
Q
V�/J)Lu
N
M
�
M
M
T
W
W
�
Er
Q
Lu
O
M
W
2
C
c
Q
O
�o
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/26/2019
REVISIONS:
ODP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
SITE PLAN
ISCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
EXHIBIT 4: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The following ism excerpt him the ShucNve Map v ithmthe Comprehensive Flare.
ILI ��
W. 35v`Ave
Subjed Woperty
Neighborhoods
rd
PIM wg Commis...
Cese Nee Ws 18-25mNWs1826/Pone1 PVMvs Ppl es
EXHIBIT 5: SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Attached as an 11x17 document on the following page.
Planning Commission 17
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
THE BELOW SIGNED OWNER(S) OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENTS THEREOF,
DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL
BE DEVELOPED AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN, AND AS MAY
OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY LAW, I (WE) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE
APPROVAL OF A REZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND APPROVAL OF
THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY
RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PURSUANT
TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-121 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF
LAWS.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
JAY FEASTER, FOR AMES PARTNERS LLC
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON )
THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS
DAY OF A.D. 20BY
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES:
NOTARY PUBLIC
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
I, MICHAEL D. MILLER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF THE
BOUNDARY OF THE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN WAS MADE BY ME OR
UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE,
INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO
STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, THE ACCOMPANYING PLAN
ACCURATELY REPRESENTS SAID SURVEY.
SIGNATURE: DATE:
MICHAEL D. MILLER, PLS
COLORADO LICENSE NUMBER 38111
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF COLORADO )
) SS
COUNTY OF JEFFERSON )
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT
GOLDEN, COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK M.
ON THE DAY OF 20— A.D., IN
BOOK PAGE , RECEPTION NO.
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
BY:
(DEPUTY)
PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION:
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL THIS DAY OF 20_
BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION.
CHAIRPERSON
CITY CERTIFICATION:
APPROVED THIS DAY OF
RIDGE CITY COUNCIL.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
20_ BY THE WHEAT
MAYOR
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
VICINITY MAP
- COVER SHEET
ARCHIiECTURE
SDP -2
- SITE PLAN
ZONING:
PROPOSED LAND
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
USE: DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
SDP -3
- LANDSCAPE PLAN
AREAS
SDP -4
- LANDSCAPE NOTES &
DETAILS
BUILDING
COVERAGE (SF)
SDP -5
- BUILDING ELEVATIONS
- UNITS
o
SDP -6
In Li
- UNITS
w
SDP -7
w
- UNITS
3316 & 3324
SDP -8
- BUILDING ELEVATIONS
- UNITS
3316 & 3324
m
- DETACHED GARAGE ELEVATIONS
m
m
w
0.1941
8456
1 2759 (32.6%)
40%
3536 (41.8%)
23%
FLOOR AREA BY
USE:
mz
Inn
z
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS:
4
PROPOSED DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE:
PROJ
CT LOC
I TION
PROPOSED
STANDARD (ONSITE, GARAGE PARKING)
N a
2 PER UNIT;
8 TOTAL
BICYCLE
N/A
0
ON STREET
N/A
8
_
}
Jo
w
N
3I
L,33RD AVE
FF
FF
Z
�
LLI
V)
w
Ld
Q
u- D
U
m
32ND AVE
Z
29TH AVE
30TH AVE
NORTH
VICINITY MAP - NOT TO SCALE
CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOOD:
THE AMES PARTNERS DUPLEXES COMPLIES DIRECTLY WITH
THE WHEAT RIDGE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY PRESERVING
AND ENHANCING THE NEIGHBORHOOD, PROVIDING HOUSING
DIVERSITY, AND ENHANCING COMMUNITY CHARACTER. THE
PROJECT IS PEDESTRIAN FRIENDLY, CLEARLY DEFINES
PEDESTRIAN AND PARKING AREAS, AND WILL BE VISUALLY
ATTRACTIVE USING WELL -THOUGHT OUT LANDSCAPING,
FACADES, STREET PRESENCE, AND APPROPRIATELY SCALED
RESIDENCES. ARCHITECTURE WILL BE TRADITIONAL AND WILL
FEATURE COVERED FRONT PORCHES, VERTICAL AND
HORIZONTAL WOOD SIDING, OPEN REAR PATIOS, CEDAR
FENCES, ASPHALT SHINGLE SLOPED ROOFS, AND A HIGH
LEVEL OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY NOT TYPICALLY FOUND
ON PRODUCTION HOMES. EACH UNIT FEATURES 3
BEDROOMS, 3 BATHROOMS, AND EXCLUSIVE OWN 2 -CAR
GARAGES, DETACHED FROM THE PRIMARY RESIDENTIAL
BUILDINGS, ACCESSED FROM THE ALLEY. THE PROJECT WILL
REQUIRE A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-3 TO PRD.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION, CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
COLORADO.
SDP SHEET INDEX:
SDP -1
- COVER SHEET
ARCHIiECTURE
SDP -2
- SITE PLAN
ZONING:
PROPOSED LAND
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
USE: DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
SDP -3
- LANDSCAPE PLAN
AREAS
SDP -4
- LANDSCAPE NOTES &
DETAILS
BUILDING
COVERAGE (SF)
SDP -5
- BUILDING ELEVATIONS
- UNITS
3300 & 3308
SDP -6
- BUILDING ELEVATIONS
- UNITS
3300 & 3308
SDP -7
- BUILDING ELEVATIONS
- UNITS
3316 & 3324
SDP -8
- BUILDING ELEVATIONS
- UNITS
3316 & 3324
SDP -9
- DETACHED GARAGE ELEVATIONS
23%
PROJECT DATA TABLE:
ARCHIiECTURE
fIEBIGARCH.COM
ZONING:
PROPOSED LAND
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
USE: DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL
AREAS
ACRES
SQUARE
FEET
BUILDING
COVERAGE (SF)
REQUIRED
LANDSCAPE
LANDSCAPE
(SF)
SOD (% OF
LANDSCAPE)
TRACT A
0.0425
1849.75
o
00
�
W
o
a
N/A
DRAINAGE POND
RE: SITE PLAN
N/A
1849.75
N/A
LOT 1
0.1941
8456
2759 (32.6%)
40%
3536 (41.8%)
23%
LOT 2
0.1941
8456
1 2759 (32.6%)
40%
3536 (41.8%)
23%
FLOOR AREA BY
USE:
RESIDENTIAL:
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS:
4
PROPOSED DENSITY UNITS PER ACRE:
9.29
PARKING SUMMARY:
REQUIRED
PROPOSED
STANDARD (ONSITE, GARAGE PARKING)
2 PER UNIT;
8 TOTAL
2 PER UNIT;
8 TOTAL
BICYCLE
N/A
0
ON STREET
N/A
8
NOTE: SOD CANNOT MAKE UP MORE THAN 50% OF ANY LOT'S LANDSCAPING.
MULCH CANNOT EXCEED 35% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPING FOR ANY LOT.
CASE HISTORY:
WZ-18-25
WZ-18-26
MS -18-07
PHASING:
THIS PROJECT IS ANTICIPATED TO HAVE ONLY ONE PHASE. HOWEVER,
FUTURE PHASING, IF REQUIRED, WILL NOT REQUIRE AMENDMENT TO
THIS PLAN.
PROJECT DIRECTORY:
OWNER/DEVELOPER/BUILDER:
AMES PARTNERS, LCC
JAY FEASTER
19510 W. 55TH PLACE
GOLDEN, COLORADO 80403
720-891-7916
ARCHITECT:
FIEBIG ARCHITECTURE, PLLC
MICHAEL FIEBIG
906 TIMBERVALE TRAIL
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80129
303-594-7584
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:
JENNIFER GOSCHA
303-564-7840
fIEBIG
ARCHIiECTURE
fIEBIGARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
J
�
Lu
Z
<
c/)c�
w
Q
N
CID
-'M
M
o
00
�
W
o
a
w
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
O
M
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/22/2019
REVISIONS:
SDP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
COVER SHEET
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -1
LEGEND:
PROPERTY/LOT LINE
SETBACK/ZONE LOT
DEPTH (SEE CALLOUTS)
6' CEDAR FENCE
d .
•' •d'::': CONCRETE
•4
WATER
RE: CIVIILLUALITY POND
ORIG. GRADE SPOT ELEVATION CALLOUT
ELEVATION: XXXX.XX'
A/c A/C UNIT
�1 ROOF DOWNSPOUT W/
DRAINAGE DIRECTION
ry
iff
W
ORIG. GRADE ELEVATION:
0
o�
az
wM
low
Z N
a
aw
d'
O
W Y
cn
Mai
0w
amZn
to
N K Y
N M } Q
I
www
oN
N
Y
o:
M}a
co
O N
N
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CIN OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
151.00'
3.8' 16'-0"
FRONT SETBACK: 25'-0" 50'-10" 32'-4 1/4" 21'-0" (3'-9 3/4") CROSS EASEMENT BY PLAT
ACCESS
ORIG. GRADE
WATER QUALITY LANDSCAPE WALL, ELEVATION: 5462.95'
POND, RE: CIVIL MAX HT: 1'-9"
J
TRACT A
AREA = 1849.75 SF
d:
d
FLOWLINE:
4
♦d
COVLKLU --\
+5463.77'
I PORCH, TYP.
,•
LOT 1
• d
:n•
�
J
AREA = 8456 SF
44
d <
J
cn Er
LU
Z
<
d
c�
o
00
�
W
o
ErM
Lu
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
r
IL
Q
•d .:
a �
z
d
d
a:
.. 4.. 4
' ;a
j
d
I NEW CONCRETE
a
WALK TIED TO
cn
EXISTING WALK
IN R.O.W.
ur:
z
...
a.
a.
♦ a' ,
FLOWLINE:
ORIG. GRADE
+5464.44'
ELEVATION:
4' 4.
1
X5464.36'
4'
— —
y:
d -
2
4 ♦a
d
d'
�
de:
r—♦ �T
LOT 2
:SF]
i
�
m
AREA = 8456
SIDEWALK, 6"
<
•
.
;AL CURB, 2'
'
'
•.
14
d v. d ',
: < '
ER, RE: CIVIL
:.° .
;4 :♦.
4'
°
�4T
,
4.
G. E
,.
4
i
<a
e:
•• a�.
3.8'
NCONCRETE
EW
(3
—9 3�4")
I WALK TIED TO
„
2'-0
EXISTING WALK
IN R.O.W.
FLOWLINE-
+5465.22 ;
12" ROOF EAVES,
TYP EA. SIDE
12" ROOF EAVES,
TYP EA. SIDE
3324 AMES ST.
FFE: +5467.85'
3316 AMES ST.
FFE: +5467.85'
3308 AMES ST.
3300 AMES ST.
FFE: +5468.82'
LLL / —
12'-0" 1
11'-0"
21.3' (21'-4 1/4")
I -
• SOD YARD
s.I
4•
.'CONC..;
'PATIO a CONCRETE c�
WALKWAYS TO
1.: GARAGES
j.
•T..
'.a I •.t 4:
..fid. '•r �'
� 6—FOOT CEDAR
FENCE BETWEEN
�a' , •'.... '.•; ': UNITS c,
CONC..
PATIO
SOD YARD
d.
•d
I b.a
♦d'
GATE
12'-0" Ilk 21.3' (21'-4 1/4")
11'-0"
I •4 d.
I
♦ :. : '' P.' ..',e :. SOD YARD
.'.PATIO CONCRETE O1
WALKWAYS TO
GARAGES
I ' • 'P
I.
4 • i
6 -FOOT CEDAR
FENCE BETWEEN
UNITS o�
CONC. I
PATIO,
SOD YARD
I a;.
..
d.
I4
M O Q i v in, I�/�715' SIDEWALK, 6"/�17�Jalo o f2R.O.W. TO BE VERTICAL CURB, 2'
N DEDICATED a GUTTER, RE: CIVIL
ORIG. GRAD GRASS
n e
ELEVATION: 5465.89 ,• d ;a n.
♦ 4'
.a
25'-0" FRONT SETBACK 1,-0" 48'-10"
33RD AVE (SECONDARY STREET)
—0"
of CDOT TYPE 2 (SECTION
IIB), 2' CATCH GUTTER
WITH 6" VERTICAL
1 CURB, REQUIRED
I ALONG NORTH SIDE OF
////// •<' . THE DRIVE AISLE
d:
'
777
CDOT TYPE 2 (SECTION
IIB), 1' SPILL GUTTER
io d • :?' e':; • : •. WITH 6" VERTICAL
I .: y " • : e . 1 CURB, REQUIRED
ALONG EAST SIDE OF
DRIVE AISLE. PROVIDE
• GAPS IN CURB WHERE
DOWNSPOUTS DRAIN
FROM NEIGHBORING
I BUILDING
d
U
U .a de,. "d •.
W ' •. 4
17
• 4
4. .. I
• 4
4
•e : t
z . . •°
p� . 1
a •4..
z
e `.a..
11'-4" '* 1
...' ad
•7 7k
ORIG. GRADE .. 4 a
ELEVATION:
GATE 5463.34' <
GATE
GATE
I i-"+
GRASS
.ELEVATION:' VALK
d• :d
'-0" 32'-4 1/4" _ 21'-0"
54.83.72
4
♦d
fIEBIGARCH.COM
d
• d
:n•
�
J
z
44
d <
J
cn Er
LU
Z
<
cn
w
Q
N
M
MI..
c�
o
00
�
W
o
ErM
Lu
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
r
IL
Q
•d .:
a �
z
d
z
.. 4.. 4
' ;a
a
z
...
a.
a.
♦ a' ,
•�.a.
z
O
4' 4.
1
4'
1
W
d -
2
4 ♦a
d'
r—♦ �T
i
�
m
<
•
•.
14
a:
�4T
,
4.
G. E
,.
i
<a
e:
3.8'
16'-0"
(3
—9 3�4")
DRIVE AISLE
„
2'-0
SITE PLAN
SCALE: 1/8'=1'-0"
NORTH
fIEBIG
ARCHIiECTJRE
fIEBIGARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
J
cn Er
LU
Z
<
cn
w
Q
N
M
MI..
c�
o
00
�
W
o
ErM
Lu
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
O
M
M
PROJ. N0. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/26/2019
REVISIONS:
SDP DRAWINGS
ISHEET TITLE:
SITE PLAN
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -2
LEGEND:
PROPERTY LINE
SETBACK/ZONE LOT DEPTH (SEE CALLOUTS)
6' CEDAR FENCE
ORIG. GRADE SPOT ELEVATION CALLOUT
ELEVATION: XXXX.XX'
ac A/C UNIT
�O ROOF DOWNSPOUT W/
DRAINAGE DIRECTION
°
CONCRETE
SF
REQUIRED TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA:
4,690
OF
TOTAL LIVING VEGETATION:
7,072
HARDSCAPES
1,578
SF
X X X X X X X X X X X 1" GRANITE ROCK MULCH
OVER
WEED
2,014
SF
x x x x x X X X X X X
BARRIER FABRIC, 3" THICK
WITH
303-564-7840
SHRUBS/PERENNIALS
1" GRANITE ROCK MULCH
OVER
WEED
2,370
SF
BARRIER FABRIC, 3" THICK
(NO
PLANTS)
�
IRRIGATED TURF
N
5,058
SF
PLANT KEY:
KEY # SIZE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME LEGEND
TREES DECIDUOUS:
GI 4 2.25" CAL. BB GLEDITSIA TRICANTHOS 'IMPERIAL' HONEYLOCUST, IMPERIAL
SHRUBS DECIDUOUS:
SLM 10 #5 GAL CONT SPIREA BUMALDA 'LIMEMOUND'
VRH 8 #5 GAL CONT VIBURNUM RHYTIOOPHYLOIDES
'ALLEGHANY'
ORNAMENTAL GRASSES:
HEL 12 #1 GAL CONT HELICOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS
GRIPER, LIMEMOUND
VIBURNUM, LEATHERLEAF
BLUE ARENA
PAN 34 #1 GAL CONT PANICUM VIRGATUM 'SHENANDOAH' SWITCH GRASS
TOTAL COMBINED LOT AREA:
18,762
SF
REQUIRED TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA:
4,690
OF
TOTAL LIVING VEGETATION:
7,072
SF
TOTAL NON—LIVING MATERIAL:
3,948
SF
PROPOSED TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREA:
11,020
SF
PERCENTAGE OF TURF:
5,058
SF -46%
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
151.00'
3.8'8'"
(3'-9 3/4") 9 -0" -0
(E) VACATED
DRIVE AISLE ALLEY 1'-0"
FRONT SETBACK: 25'-W 50'-10" 32'-41/4" 21'-0" EASEMENT
LANDSCAPE NOTES TRACT A: ANY ORIG. GRADE
ORIG. GRADE ELEVATION: 5464.83 WATER QUALITY LANDSCAPE WALL, SHRUBS OR PERENNIALS TO BE ELEVATION: 5462.95
POND, RE: CIVIL MAX HT: 1'-9" INSTALLED SOUTH OF POND LIMITS
RE: CIVIL
xxx xxXXX —
QN &{..X X X%1,/b<,� X 'X & X 1 1 N
TRACT AL4xx
x
AREA = 1849.75 SEX X X X X X X x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x X X X X x x x x X X X X X X X X X X X X d��, <° `
x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X '°
11
d
X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x x X X X X X X X x x x x x x x x x x x x z x x x x x x x X X X X X X X X Xx x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xx128.°^ x x x x x x x x21 414XMp xx x x x x x x x x x x . 8 d x x x> x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x xx
m z p +y1 }+ G T GATE Y +++ ° ,
DS P R A A/c
a _ DS
,da a.
a
a di
°
d " 3324 AMES ST. X �° d
z °
FL N GTI X X FFE +5467.85'°a o d
a
+5 3. > ° SOD YARD X s
d
OT 1 DETACHED d
a 3. °
I CONC. c5
X X
AREA SF PATIO ° CONCRETE GARAGE z
WALKWAYS TO X X FFE: 0
eGARAGES +5466.61' w °
�5� PAN` z d
Q 4 ° d °a).aPA °
d 4
Po °d ° ° e a Q °d °
X X X aX °X X X
X x X X X r ` a
° a
d d
X x x x x x x x x x °
° a �6) HEL° as ° a
°d
W a 6—FOOT CEDAR zo °
W ° FENCE BETWEEN x x °
NEW CONCRETE d UNITS
a a ° I WALK TIED TO CONC. ° e " DETACHED e °
(n ° J EXISTING WALK X X PATIO GARAGE p a
IN R.O.W., TYP SOD YARD x x FFE: U
® N I 3316 AMES ST. +5466.61' n
�e
COVERED PORCH x X FFE: +5467.85' �' z e d
Q TYP: 72 SF X X d x x
N $ d°
L -L- n x x DS r r r r r f f f f f f f 4 DS
i
ry ac 4) PAN -j
FLOWLINE: ORIG. GRADEb GATE GATE °
et +5464.44' ELEVATION:
L J d° 5464.36' X X Nbi
m a„
o 41 �J� I \ — — — — o — ORIG. GRADE
f— < a 1z'-°^ x1.3' (zr-a va^) ELEVATION:
V)
N m o I ❑ GTE GATE 5463.34'
12" ROOF EAVES, )1`0" a
Ds TYP EA. SIDE ac
x �Ni'WIt _T �
Q dx xx x z
3308 AMES ST.
d
LOT 2 X FFE: +5468.82' a °
YARD
a, AREA = 8456' SF SOD �„°°
a°
d °
d xj x
CONC
.
9) PAN PATO'
DF+FE5T4A6C7H.5ED4
NCRETEU
WALKWAYS TO
5 SIDEWALK, 6" GARAGES
VERTICAL CURB 2' Ix
zaU 8
d
GUTTER, RE: CIVIL PA
ad
a `
e °
as
e° d' de c
x °x X X X x u
a
X X X X X °
° X X x X x X X x X xfi1c Xp da c
4 r' ' I ,,( 4
4 614
6—FOOT CEDAR 0
FENCE BETWEEN
ad <
UNITS
° rn X% CONC. GARAGEED z ° A
°
LLu PATIO FFE: 0 d °
e SOD YARD x x a°
rFF
+ 467.54'
+INE: 468. 2' a z
GTI x x x %;.� b5 x -x x x r„�. r,Xjx
r, X X x NC DS (4)' PAN' ,
1 x x k x x� x 9 x �x x0x �x xx x x II II a GAT TE 4xxxxxx �`, �X X, x, °
° a <
.11-4'
(4 PAN—/(7) SLM
m
ORIG. GRAD ° GRASS GTI GRASS GTI d
d d
ELEVATION: 5465.89' d ° 0 G p °
(QIDEWALK ° d a SIDEWALK d d eE AT ON• 5 3.72• ° d
Y
_ 3.8'
25'-0" FRONT SETBACK 1 " 48'-10" 1-0^ 32'-41/4" 1'-0" (3,_93/4"P DRIVE AISLE
33RD AVE (SE
EET)
0 4 8 16
SCALE : 1/8"= 1'0"
FIEBIG
ARCHITECTURE
FIEBIGARCH.CUM
LANDSCAPE BY:
Jennifer Goscha
8 Haystack Road
Glenwood Springs
CO 81601
303-564-7840
jmgoscha@gmail.com
v
�
�
N
O
O
C
O
PROD. NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 02/20/2019
REVISIONS:
V RAW1NG5
ISHEET TITLE:
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -3
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES:
THE LANDSCAPE PLAN IS INTENDED TO SHOW THE OVERALL
LANDSCAPING INTENT OF THE PROJECT AND NOT INTENDED AS A
LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT. PROPOSED PLANTING
LOCATIONS AND POTENTIAL VARIETIES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN WERE
PROVIDED FOR INCORPORATION INTO THIS DOCUMENT.
FINAL PLANT SELECTION, IRRIGATION DESIGN, SOIL AMENDMENT
REQUIREMENTS, AND RELATED LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS AND
SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT REQUIREMENTS:
LANDSCAPING SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE CODE. SPECIFICALLY, LANDSCAPING TO CONSIST OF THE
FOLLOWING:
NO LESS THAN 25% OF THE GROSS LOT AREA AND NO LESS
THAN 100% OF THE FRONT YARD SETBACK SHALL BE LANDSCAPED
(EXCLUSIVE OF DRIVEWAY AND SIDEWALK ACCESS TO THE HOME).
NO MORE THAN 50% OF THE TOTAL LANDSCAPE COVERAGE SHALL
BE COMPRISED OF TURF.
IRRIGATION NOTE:
AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE INSTALLED WITH SEPARATE
ZONES FOR POPUYP SPRAY IN ALL TURF AREAS, AND DRIP
EMITTERS IN ALL PLANTING BEDS.
STREET TREE REQUIREMENTS:
DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENT: 1 TREE
PER 70 LE OF FRONTAGE
PROJECT FRONTAGE: 258 LE
STREET TREES REQUIRED: 4
STREET TREES PROVIDED: 4
4X4 POST
1" CROWN
CLIP ANGLE
CLIP ANGLE
N
8' O.C. (MAX.)
2X4 RAIL (ON EDGE)
(6' RENCE ONLY)
2X4 RAIL (ON EDGE)
FACE BOARDS ON BOTH J
SIDES. (1"X4" OR 1"X6" CEDAR)
I 4
CLASS B CONCRETE)
NOTES:
ALL FACE BOARDS SHALL BE OF CEDAR.
4"X4" POSTS ADN 2"X4" RAILS SHALL BE
CEDAR OR PRESSURE TREATED FIR.
PAY ITEM: PER LF OR 6' CEDAR FENCE
DETAIL OF CEDAR FENCE (3 FT. & 6 FT.
HEIGHT
(3 FT OR 6 FT)
4' DETAIL
City of L -E01 WOOD.FENC1 CODE
Wheat Midge
T AND 6' CEDAR FENCE L
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION APPROVED BY: SN APPROVE DATE 10/2016
F I E B I G
ARCHITECTURE
FIEBIGARCH.COM
LANDSCAPE BY:
Jennifer Goscha
8 Haystack Road
Glenwood Springs
CO 81601
303-564-7840
jmgoscha@gmail.com
PROJ. NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 02/20/2019
REVISIONS:
V RAWING5
SHEET TITLE:
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
SCALE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -4
DO NOT CUT LEADER. PRUNE DAMAGED OR DEAD WOOD AFTER
PLANTING AND STAKING. KEEP CROWN SHAPE TYPICAL OF SPECIES.
14 GUAGE GALV. WIRE
WITH 1/2" 0 X 18" WHITE PVC PIPE ON EACH WIRE.
SPECIFIED TREE STRAP COLLAR, DO NOT TWIST.
SPECIFIED POSTS, 2 EA 6/8' HT. ALLIGN AS APPROVED. KEEP PLUMB
WITH TOPS EVEN. DRIVE 12" INTO UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE OUTSIDE
PLANTING PIT. TREE STAKES LOCATED INSIDE WATERING SAUCER ON
TREESGREATER THAN 3" CAL. USE GUYS AS PER EVERGREEN TREES.
WRAP ENTIRE SURFACE OF TRUNK UP TO BRANCHES WITH REQUIRED
WRAPPING WHEN SPECIFIED. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS. SECURE @ TOP
WITH DUCT TAPE.
0" AT TRUNK 4" DEPTH SPECIFIED MULCH AT EDGE OF RING, INSIDE 4"
WATERING SAUCER. REMOVE SAUCER UPON SODDING/SEEDING IN
IRRIGATED AREAS.
PLANT TREE 24" ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE LEVEL ON UNDISTURBED
SOIL. SET TRUNK PLUMB.
SPECIFIED BACKFILL MIXTURE. ADMENDMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN TOP 12"
III—I I —III—_I DEPTH.
-III—I I REMOVE ALL TWINE & WIRE FROM BALL. REMOVE WIRE BASKETS.
III—I—III-III-III INITIAL STABILIZING BACKFILL 1/3 DEPTH, COMPACTED.
-I II III-III-III-�
UNDISTURBED PIT BOTTOM FOR ROOT BALL BASE.
BALL DIA. + 24"
,20
DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING
OF \NHEgT
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
NOT TO SCALE GUYING DETAIL
DETAIL
8
CODE
OF ""EqT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
L -B01 TREE
DETAIL
L
ENGINEERING DIVISION
COtORA00 APPROVED BY: SNN 06/07
CODE
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING
L
ENGINEERING DIVISION
COGORPOO APPROVED BY: SNN 06/07
4X4 POST
1" CROWN
CLIP ANGLE
CLIP ANGLE
N
8' O.C. (MAX.)
2X4 RAIL (ON EDGE)
(6' RENCE ONLY)
2X4 RAIL (ON EDGE)
FACE BOARDS ON BOTH J
SIDES. (1"X4" OR 1"X6" CEDAR)
I 4
CLASS B CONCRETE)
NOTES:
ALL FACE BOARDS SHALL BE OF CEDAR.
4"X4" POSTS ADN 2"X4" RAILS SHALL BE
CEDAR OR PRESSURE TREATED FIR.
PAY ITEM: PER LF OR 6' CEDAR FENCE
DETAIL OF CEDAR FENCE (3 FT. & 6 FT.
HEIGHT
(3 FT OR 6 FT)
4' DETAIL
City of L -E01 WOOD.FENC1 CODE
Wheat Midge
T AND 6' CEDAR FENCE L
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION APPROVED BY: SN APPROVE DATE 10/2016
F I E B I G
ARCHITECTURE
FIEBIGARCH.COM
LANDSCAPE BY:
Jennifer Goscha
8 Haystack Road
Glenwood Springs
CO 81601
303-564-7840
jmgoscha@gmail.com
PROJ. NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 02/20/2019
REVISIONS:
V RAWING5
SHEET TITLE:
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
SCALE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -4
NOTE:
DO NOT PLANT ANY PLANT WITH ROOTBALL NOT IN
CONFORMANCE WITH COLORADO NURSERY ACT
REQUIREMENTS. HOLD MULCH GRADE 1" BELOW
EDGE OF WALK, EDGING OR CURB.
CONCRETE CURB, EDGING, OR SIDEWALK
3'-4' SETBACK
PRUNE ALL DAMAGED OR DEAD WOOD
AFTER PLANTING AND MULCHING
SET SHRUB AT GRADE GROWN IN CONTAINER
OR GROWN IN NURSERY. SET TOP OF JUNIPER'S
ROOTBALL TO FINISH GRADE OF MULCH
APPLY SPECIFIED MULCH AT 3" DEPTH
- SCORE CONTAINER ROOTBALLS WITH
- ENCIRCLING ROOTS
I- FILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL
MIX. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR COMPOSITION
REMOVE CONTAINER. PLACE ROOTBALL ON
UNDISTURBED SOIL
BALL DIA. + 12"
SHRUB PLANTING
NOT TO SCALE
OF \NHEgT
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
L-AO1 SHRUB
DETAIL
8
CODE
DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS
SHRUB PLANTING
L
ENGINEERING DIVISION
COtORA00 APPROVED BY: SNN 06/07
4X4 POST
1" CROWN
CLIP ANGLE
CLIP ANGLE
N
8' O.C. (MAX.)
2X4 RAIL (ON EDGE)
(6' RENCE ONLY)
2X4 RAIL (ON EDGE)
FACE BOARDS ON BOTH J
SIDES. (1"X4" OR 1"X6" CEDAR)
I 4
CLASS B CONCRETE)
NOTES:
ALL FACE BOARDS SHALL BE OF CEDAR.
4"X4" POSTS ADN 2"X4" RAILS SHALL BE
CEDAR OR PRESSURE TREATED FIR.
PAY ITEM: PER LF OR 6' CEDAR FENCE
DETAIL OF CEDAR FENCE (3 FT. & 6 FT.
HEIGHT
(3 FT OR 6 FT)
4' DETAIL
City of L -E01 WOOD.FENC1 CODE
Wheat Midge
T AND 6' CEDAR FENCE L
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION APPROVED BY: SN APPROVE DATE 10/2016
F I E B I G
ARCHITECTURE
FIEBIGARCH.COM
LANDSCAPE BY:
Jennifer Goscha
8 Haystack Road
Glenwood Springs
CO 81601
303-564-7840
jmgoscha@gmail.com
PROJ. NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 02/20/2019
REVISIONS:
V RAWING5
SHEET TITLE:
LANDSCAPE DETAILS
SCALE:
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -4
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
MATERIAL LEGEND/SYMBOLS
VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING, COLOR: FARMHOUSE
WHITE
HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING, COLOR:
FARMHOUSE WHITE
ASPHALT SHINGLES - TAMKO
HERITAGE, OXFORD GREY
0 T.O.130 ROOF
++130 8
MIDPOINT
+
125 8
T.O. PLATE
+120 2
2ND FLOOR FFE
+111 2
T.O. PLATE
+110 -2
1ST FLOOR FFE
+101-2
PRIMARY BASE PLANE
5366.42 +100 -0
T.O. ROOF
+130 -6
MIDPOINT
+125 8
T.O. PLATE
+120+1202
2ND FLOOR FFE
tbPLATE
'+110 2
�FiOOR FFE
+101 2
PRIMARY BASE PLANE
5366.42 +100 -0
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0'
REAR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0'
fIEBIG
ARCHIiECTURE
fIEBIGARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
J
cn Er
LU
Z
<
cn
w
Q
N
M
M
c�
o
oo
�
W
o
ItM
a
Lu
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
O
M
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/22/2019
REVISIONS:
SDP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
ELEVATIONS
UNITS 3300 & 3308
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -5
MATERIAL LEGEND/SYMBOLS
VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING, COLOR: FARMHOUSE
WHITE
HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING, COLOR:
FARMHOUSE WHITE
T•0. ROOF
+130+130 B
ROOF MIDPOINT
25 B� -
T•0. PLATE
+120+120 2T
2ND FLOOR FFE
A!"FpTE
x+110 2
FLOOR FFE
+1m 2
PRIMARY BASE PLANE
5366.42 (+100--u-)
ASPHALT SHINGLES -
TAMKO HERITAGE,
OXFORD GREY
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
1 SCALE: 1 /4'=1'-0' - - - - - - - - - -
SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0'
fIEBIG
ARCHIiECTURE
fIEBIGARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
J
cn Er
LU
Z
<
cn
w
Q
N
M
M
c�
o
oo
�
W
o
ErM
a
w
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
O
M
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/22/2019
REVISIONS:
SDP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
ELEVATIONS
UNITS 3300 & 3308
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -6
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
MATERIAL LEGEND/SYMBOLS
VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING, COLOR: FARMHOUSE
WHITE
HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING, COLOR:
FARMHOUSE WHITE
ASPHALT SHINGLES - TAMKO
HERITAGE, OXFORD GREY
+10. RW
130'-„
ROOF MIDPOINT
^
T•0. PLATE
+120+120 8
w 2ND FM
8
008
L61 PLATE
+110'-8-
MATERIAL
11 -8
w IST FLOOR FFE
+101+101 8
PRIMARY BASE PLANE
5365.37 (+100--0-)
+10. ROOF
130-11
ROOF MIDPOINT
+126 -1
T•0. PLATE
+120+120 8
FLOOR FFE
+111.-d
T.O. PLATE
+11 -8
w 15T FLOOR FFE
+101+101 8
PRIMARY BASE PLANE
5365.37 (+100--0-)
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-O'
REAR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-O'
fIEBIG
ARCHIiECTURE
fIEBIGARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
J
�
LU
Z
<
c/)c�
w
Q
N
M
M
o
oo
�
W
o
ItM
a
Lu
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
O
M
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/22/2019
REVISIONS:
SDP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
ELEVATIONS
UNITS 3316 & 3324
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -7
MATERIAL LEGEND/SYMBOLS
+130'-11
126' 1
MIDPOINT
+
T.12O. 0 -6 PLATE
+
2NDFLOOR FFE
+111-6
T.O. PLATE
+11OW -6
1ST FL00R FFE
+101-6
PRIMARY BASE PLANE
53
65.37 +100 -0
VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING, COLOR: FARMHOUSE
WHITE
HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING, COLOR:
FARMHOUSE WHITE
ASPHALT SHINGLES -
TAMKO HERITAGE,
OXFORD GREY
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
1 SCALE: 1 /4'=1'-0' - - - - - - - - - -
SIDE ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0'
fIEBIG
ARCHIiECTURE
fIEBIGARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
J
cn Er
LU
Z
<
cn
w
Q
N
M
M
c�
o
00
�
W
o
ErM
a
Lu
ap
O
M
W
2
C
G
Q
O
M
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/22/2019
REVISIONS:
SDP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
ELEVATIONS
UNITS 3316 & 3324
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -8
AMES PARTNERS PLANNED
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
LOTS 1 AND 2 OF THE FEASTER SUBDIVISION
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO
MATERIAL LEGEND/SYMBOLS
VERTICAL BOARD & BATTEN
SIDING, COLOR: FARMHOUSE
WHITE
HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING, COLOR:
FARMHOUSE WHITE
ElASPHALT SHINGLES - TAMKO
HERITAGE, OXFORD GREY
T.O. ROOF
+114-9"
I
I
T.O. SLAB OL
+100'-6-
REAR BASE PLANE
+100 -0
I
T.O. ROOF
+114 -9
I
I
T.O. SLAB
+100'-6-
REAR
100 -6REAR BASE PLANE
+100'-0"
T.O. ROOF ,,
- P" [T V 1 V 1 SHECI I SUNAD I AND
SUI N IWN
GH
SPECIFIC GRADE AND FNDN HEIGHTS.
I
REAR
SIDE
GARAGE ELEVATIONS
SCALE: 1/4'=1'-0'
FIERIG
ARCHITECTURE
fIE916ARCH.COM
U
�
J
w
W¢�
z
�
LL
Q
c/) �/�
Lu
N
M
�
M
M
T
W
W
�
Er
Q
w
O
M
W
2
C
c
Q
O
�o
M
PROJ, NO. 180406
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
CADD FILE:
DATE: 03/22/2019
REVISIONS:
SDP DRAWINGS
SHEET TITLE:
GARAGE ELEVATIONS
SCALE: AS NOTED
SHEET NUMBER:
SDP -9
EXHIBIT 6: SITE PHOTOS
View of the subject property looking northeast along Ames Street. The neighboring apartment
building can be seen in the background. The water quality area would be located in the space between
the northern lot and the apartment building, acting as an additional buffer.
View of the site looking east from Ames Street. The neighboring apartment building is to the left, and
the commercial assisted living facility is in the background. The proposed alley and single -story
garages provide a separation and buffer between the subject site and the assisted living.
Planning Commission 19
Case Nos. WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-261Ames Partners Duplexes
View of the subject property looking north from W. 33`d Avenue. Both adjacent lots can be seen in the
photo. The driveway would be located to the west (left) of the assisted living facility, allowing access
to the detached garages.
View of the subject property looking north from W. 33`d Avenue, up Ames Street. The buildings
across Ames Street are primarily single-family homes on small lots.
Planning Commission 20
Case Nos. WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-261Ames Partners Duplexes
EXHIBIT 7: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING
NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES
Meeting Date: November 8, 2018
Attending Staff: Scott Cutler, Planner II
Location of Meeting: Wheat Ridge Municipal Building
Property Address: Vacant lot, NE corner of W. 33`d Ave & Ames Street
Property Owner(s): Novy Development LLC
Applicant: Jay Feaster
Applicant Present? Yes
Existing Zoning: Residential -Three (R-3)
Existing Comp. Plan: Neighborhood Buffer
Existing Site Conditions: The site is located at the northeast corner of Ames Street and W. 33`d
Avenue near the eastern border of Wheat Ridge. It is currently vacant, with the exception of some
gardening boxes. The property is zoned Residential -Three (R-3), which permits medium to high-
density residential development, ranging from single-family to multi -unit developments. Properties to
the north and south (across W. 33`d Avenue) are also zoned R-3. Much of the surrounding
neighborhood, including the properties directly across Ames Street, are zoned Residential -One C (R -
1C), which permits small -lot single-family homes. The senior living facility to the east of the property
is zoned Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
The site consists of four parcels: two large, platted lots on Ames Street, and two narrow (each
approximately 8 -feet wide) tracts at the eastern edge of the property. These tracts were created when
the 16 -foot wide alley was vacated. When vacations occur, the land being vacated is split between the
properties abutting the vacated land. A former owner of the subject site acquired the neighbor's 8 -foot
portion of the alley, thus giving the full width of the former alley to the subject property. The four
parcels total approximately 18,720 square feet (a survey will determine the exact figure).
Applicant Preliminary Proposal: The applicant has proposed to rezone the property from R-3 to
Planned Residential Development (PRD), allowing them to subdivide the property for two duplexes.
Due to the number of variances required by the applicant's proposed subdivision and future
development if using the R-3 zoning, a PRD was pursued to eliminate the need for variances and to
ensure high-quality architectural and site design. The two-story duplexes would have rear detached
garages accessed from an alley off of W. 33`d Avenue.
Planning Commission 21
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting:
• In addition to the applicant and staff, 2 residents from the neighborhood attended the meeting; see
attached sign-up sheets.
• Staff explained the purpose of the neighborhood meeting, and informed the members of the public
of the rezoning and planned development process.
• Staff discussed the site, its zoning and land use.
• The applicant presented their proposal and answered further questions, with help from staff.
• The members of the public were informed of their opportunity to make comments during the
process and at the required public hearings.
The following issues were discussed regarding the zone change request and proposed future
development:
A resident notified the applicant and staff of some code enforcement issues in the neighborhood,
including a nearby business that dumps water in the vacant lot.
Staff passed the information along to Code Enforcement and the Stormwater Manager.
Parking issues were discussed, including potential illegal parking and abandoned vehicles.
The proposed development includes on-site garages for each duplex unit, and will make street
changes to make street parking safer. The applicant noted that developing the site may ward off
some of the illegal activity that currently occurs there. Staff noted that Wheat Ridge has a 72 -
hour parking limit in one location on the street, but that all streets in this area allow public
parking.
• What is the arrangement of the duplexes?
Two duplexes are planned for a total offour units. They would be two stories with pitched
roofs, and detached garages in the rear. Most likely they would be 3 bedrooms, 2.5 bathrooms,
with an unfinished basement, for a total of approximately 2, 000 square feet. Interior details
haven't been worked out yet, but the applicant showed images of potential finishes.
• What is the proposed sale price?
Approximately $650-700 thousand, but the final price will be determined by the cost of
construction and market viability. The applicant noted that similar homes sell for upwards of
$750-800 thousand just a few blocks east in Denver.
• A resident noted that the water table is fairly high in this area
Noted, the applicant obtained a soils test for the property.
• A fence was suggested along the rear property line adjacent to the nursing home.
The applicant explained the site design and said that the backyards would be fenced.
Planning Commission 22
Case Nos WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-26/Ames Partners Duplexes
EXHIBIT 8: APPLICANT LETTER
Dear City of Wheat Ridge,
We are exciting about the opportunity to build one of our new homes in Wheat
Ridge. We take great pride in our work; it is truly a passion for us.
The previously proposed construction project with the previous owner consisted of
a row home with three floors and reaching a height of almost 35 feet. This
construction form has seen a great deal of backlash from the Sloan Lake Denver
neighborhood where new construction and soaring new buildings litter the
landscape. But our lot is not Denver and we felt that something of this nature would
severely detract from the neighborhood feel. The original owners site plan was
oriented with the front doors facing 33rd instead of Ames, like the remainder of the
neighbors. They did this to squeeze 5 units onto the lot and affectively would have
ended up paving over a good portion of the lot with drive aisles and patio work
There would be no private space for the home owners and because of the height, it
would infringe upon the privacy of the neighbors. Again, we felt that this just would
not be appropriate in Wheat Ridge, which is why decided to drop to only 4 units and
reorient the fronts of the homes back onto Ames street. We also dropped the 3rd
floors and plan to do only 2 story units with pitched roofs similar to a more
traditional design aesthetics and basements. We feel this would allow our new
homes to be more welcomed into the community by giving the block congruity,
giving these new homes nice front setbacks but also private back yards.
To accomplish this, we would like to apply for a Planned Development at this time.
Please see our proposed site plan and please let us know if we can provide anything
further to the city or the neighbors. This is our first time working with the city of
Wheat Ridge, so please let us know what our next steps should be. Thank you for
your consideration.
Sincerely,
Jay Feaster
Ames Partners LLC
720-891-7916
Team@FeasterRealty.com
Planning Commission 23
Case Nos. WZ-18-25 and WZ-18-261Ames Partners Duplexes
♦�4le
1w Ir
Wh6atRiLd e
g
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE
PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT
TO: Planning Commission MEETING DATE: April 4, 2019
CASE MANAGER: Scott Cutler
CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-18-23 / Applewood Village Master Sign Plan
ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a master sign plan for a Planned Commercial Development (PCD)
LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3210-3600 Youngfield Street (Applewood Village Shopping Center)
APPLICANT (S):
US Retail Partners, LLC c/o Regency Centers
OWNER (S):
US Retail Partners
APPROXIMATE AREA:
34.55 acres
PRESENT ZONING:
Planned Commercial Development (PCD)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Mixed -Use Commercial / Primary Commercial Corridor / Community
Commercial Center
ENTER INTO RECORD:
(X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
(X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION
Location Map
Planning Commission
Case No. WZ-18-23 /APSC Master Sign Plan
Site
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this
case.
I. REQUEST
Case No. WZ-18-23 is an application by US Retail Partners LLC, requesting approval of a master sign
plan for the Applewood Village Shopping Center Planned Commercial Development. The application
is for the entire site, located on the east side of Youngfield Street between W. 32°d Avenue and W. 38"
Avenue. The proposed master sign plan will apply to all lots that comprise the shopping center.
Section 26-708.1) of the City Code establishes the procedure for master sign plan approval by the
Planning Commission:
D. Master sign plan.
The planning commission may approve a master sign plan for any existing or proposed
commercial, mixed use, or industrial development of at least two (2) acres or more in size
which is under unified control either by ownership, legal association or leasehold.
2. The intent and purpose is to encourage well-planned and designed signage within a large
multiple building or multiple use complex which expresses unification and integration by
elements of architectural style, size, color, placement and lighting while at the same time
allowing for reasonable individual business identification. An additional purpose is to
encourage the elimination of existing nonconforming signs. The planning commission may
grant as a bonus for well-designed plans additional signs and/or up to a fifty (50) percent
increase in maximum square footage for each sign, and/or may permit signs in locations other
than normally permitted, based upon a finding that the proposed master sign plan substantially
meets the intent and purpose of this subsection relating to unification and integration of
signage.
Once approved at a public hearing by planning commission, all master sign plans shall be
recorded with the Jefferson County Recorder's Office and shall constitute a covenant and must
be complied with by all owners, proprietors, lessees or assigns, whether current or future. No
substantial variation from the plan shall be permitted without planning commission approval.
Noticing requirements for a master sign plan process shall follow the procedures outlined in
section 26-109.
The City has only a few properties with master sign plans, including the Lutheran Hospital campus,
Kipling Ridge, and the Corners at Wheat Ridge. Master sign plans are appropriate on these types of
developments where multiple buildings on multiple lots comprise a single cohesive development. The
City's sign code works well for single buildings on single lots, but a master sign plan better serves
these larger developments.
IL EXISTING CONDITIONS
The subject properties are located on the east side of Youngfield Street between W. 32°d and W. 38"'
Avenues with frontage on each of those streets (Exhibit 1, Aeria�. The site is zoned Planned
Planning Commission
CaseNo. WZ-18-231APSC Master Sign Plan
Commercial Development (PCD), which was approved as an Outline Development Plan in 2014 (Case
No. WZ-18-08) (Exhibit 2, Zoning Map). The Applewood Village Shopping Center is comprised of
approximately 34.55 acres in western Wheat Ridge, adjacent to the I-70 corridor, and is the city's
largest commercial center.
Applewood Village Shopping Center was originally constructed in the 1960s but has seen incremental
changes since then, with redevelopment activity picking up over the past five years. A new Wells
Fargo building was constructed in the middle of the site, a Starbucks was constructed at the southwest
corner, a King Soopers fueling station opened at the southeast corner, a new signal was installed at
32nd And Xenon, and the old Wells Fargo building was demolished. The northern building (formerly
Walmart) is currently being renovated to accommodate four new retail tenants, a major parking lot
redesign and landscaping project has commenced, and a new restaurant is being constructed along
Youngfield Street. The owner anticipates several additional investments in the site over the next few
years.
There are some existing freestanding signs on the property, including an approximately 28 -foot tall
sign at the main entrance on Youngfield Street across from the eastbound I-70 ramp entrance. There
are two individual tenant freestanding signs as well as a vacated pole sign that was used by the former
Walmart. There is currently no cohesive branding for the shopping center or a consistent internal
wayfinding signage system. For a center of its size, there is a dearth of freestanding signage.
Per City Code, the development is eligible for a master sign plan because it is over two acres in size, is
under unified ownership, and includes commercial development. The 2014 ODP did not address
signage with the understanding that a master sign plan would follow.
III. CASE ANALYSIS
The proposed master sign plan is comprised of four sheets (Exhibit 3, Master Sign Plan). The first
sheet contains signature blocks required for recordation, a vicinity map, and a brief explanation of the
purpose of the document. Signage for the site is expected to comply with the standards in Article VII
of Chapter 26 (the "sign code") except as modified by the master sign plan. Sheet 2 includes the
signage standards for freestanding/monument signs, wall signs, wayfinding signs, murals, and non-
conforming signs. Sheet 3 includes a site plan for the entire property and the locations of the existing
and proposed freestanding signs. Sheet 4 provides elevations for the freestanding signs with
dimensions and fabrication specifications.
The standards proposed in the master sign plan are summarized below in the order they appear on
Sheet 2. For each type of sign, the provided analysis compares the standards proposed in the master
sign plan with the standards in the City's sign code. The applicant's letter of request is provided in
Exhibit 4, ApplicaTRequest.
Freestanding Signs
• Allowed per Code: The sign code allows one freestanding sign per street frontage and a
maximum of two per lot. The maximum height is 50 feet since the site is located within'/4 mile
of I-70; those signs must be set back 30 feet. Signs between 7 and 15 feet tall must be set back
10 feet. The shopping center consists of 6 lots, 5 of which have street frontage. Based on the lot
configuration, the sign code would allow a total of 7 signs on the property. The largest lot (Lot
1), which is approximately 83% of the total site and has three street frontages and under the
Planning Commission 3
Case No. WZ-18-23 /APSC Master Sign Plan
sign code would still be limited to 2 freestanding signs. Changeable copy signs (which include
electronic message centers) are limited to 2 total per unified development. Maximum size of
freestanding signs is based on the area of the buildings; the signs on Lot 1 would be allowed up
to 400 square feet of sign area under the sign code.
Proposed by Applicant: The master sign plan proposes four (4) new freestanding signs and a
hierarchy of three sign types:
A "Primary Multi -tenant Sign" is 50 feet tall, 596 square feet, and set back 15 feet from
the property line on Youngfield Street. It would replace the existing 28 -foot multi -
tenant sign at the main entrance on Youngfield Street. The proposed sign is taller and
closer to the street than the code would otherwise allow. The Planning Commission is
permitted to approve up to a 50% increase in maximum square footage for each
freestanding sign, per Sec. 26-708.D.2. This sign will also accommodate an electronic
message center at the top of the sign, not to exceed 25% of the sign area This limitation
is imposed the by the sign plan and not present in the sign code.
A "Secondary Multi -tenant Sign" is 30 feet tall, 281 square feet, and set back 1 foot
from the property line on Youngfield Street. It will replace the existing freestanding
Walmart sign. The sign is located to accommodate future development of the RTD bus
transfer station and to accommodate a future 8 -foot detached sidewalk and 6 -foot
landscaped amenity zone on Youngfield Street, resulting in a perceived 15 -foot setback
from the edge of asphalt. The sign must comply with sight triangle regulations for
arterial streets, and a diagram will be submitted as part of the building permit.
Two "Tertiary Multi -tenant Signs" are 10 feet tall, 29.3 square feet each, and set back 5
feet from the property line on W. 38th Avenue and W. 32nd Avenue. The sign on 32nd
Avenue is proposed to include a changeable copy portion to show gas prices, not to
occupy more than 15% of the sign. The sign on 38d' Avenue will not include changeable
copy.
New freestanding single -tenant signs are not permitted by the master sign plan.
Findings: Staff finds that the proposed freestanding signs are consistent with the intent of the
sign code by promoting a cohesive design, by reducing the overall number of freestanding
signs that could be allowed, and substantially reducing the allowed size of all freestanding
signs with the exception of the Primary Multi -tenant Sign. The proposed designs are
appropriate for the scale of the development and will reduce sign clutter along street frontages
with only two freestanding signs on Youngfield Street along the length of six city blocks. Per
Code, all freestanding signs in the shopping center could be up to 50 feet tall, but the applicant
has only proposed one 50 -foot sign. Although the proposed signs are larger than what exists on
site today, they will allow for cohesive branding of the shopping center, improve wayfinding,
and increase the presence from I-70 which is significantly elevated above the site. The
prohibition on new single -tenant freestanding signs will also reduce clutter.
Wall Signs
• Allowed per Code: Wall signs are allowed on building fagades that are adjacent to a public
street or major interior drive. Size is limited to 1 -square foot for every linear foot of the fagade
to which the sign is affixed (a 1:1 ratio).
Proposed by Applicant:
Planning Commission
Case No. WZ-18-23 /APSC Master Sign Plan
o The master sign plan proposes that eligible fagades for wall signs include not only those
that face a public street or major interior drive, but also the corner of a building. This
would allow signage on buildings that face private parking lots that are not major
interior drives.
o A ratio of 1.5 square feet of wall signage per 1 linear foot of store frontage is proposed,
an increase from the 1:1 ratio in the sign code. The signage would not be able to exceed
75% of the total linear store frontage, which is a stricter provision and one that is not in
the sign code.
o Painted wall signs are proposed to be prohibited to provide a consistent aesthetic.
o Logos cannot exceed 30% of the sign area and cannot exceed total letter height of the
sign. The City cannot regulate sign content, but the applicant has proposed to limit the
size of business logos and will regulate this policy as a tenant -landlord agreement.
o Plastic wall -mounted "box" signs are prohibited. The City does not prohibit box signs in
the sign code. Effectively, the applicant is proposing restrictions on rectangular plastic
sign cabinets, as opposed to channel letters which would be permitted.
Findings: Staff finds that the proposed wall signs are consistent with the intent of the sign code.
The applicant has requested signage on additional fagades (those on corners which do not face
a street or major interior drive) and a higher ratio (1.5 square feet per 1 linear foot), but these
are appropriate requests given the orientation of the buildings. Their increased standards for the
types of wall signs allowed and the limitation on logo size and paint also are stricter than City
requirements. Due to the size of the shopping center and its layout, larger wall signs are
especially appropriate for visibility and wayfinding purposes within the 34 -acre site.
Informational Wa)finding Signs
• Allowed per Code: "Directional signs" are allowed per the sign code, with a maximum of 4
square feet per side. They cannot exceed 4 feet in height, or 3 feet in height if within a required
site distance triangle. There is no limit on the numbers of the signs. Directional signage must be
clearly incidental to the primary signage on a property and may only provide necessary
directional information or location of onsite buildings or facilities.
Murals
Proposed by Applicant: The master sign plan proposes a maximum height of 8 feet, with a
maximum area of 10 square feet.
Findings: Staff finds the request to be appropriate given the size of the development. The layout
of the site and multiple access points can potentially be confusing for customers, and the site is
congested enough to warrant additional signage allowances. The allowance will be particularly
useful for the multiple tenants who do not have any visibility from public streets.
Allowed per Code: The sign code allows freestanding statues, sculptures, graphic
illustrations/designs, or an architectural design or relief applied directly to or within a wall of a
building, which does not advertise or promote a particular business, service, or branded
product.
Proposed by Applicant: The master sign plan proposes a more specific requirement, but it is
very similar to the Code allowance.
Planning Commission
Case No. WZ-18-23 /APSC Master Sign Plan
Artwork not consisting of any business logo or name can be allowed with property
management approval.
Murals do not count against tenant allowed sign square footage.
Findings: Staff finds that the proposed mural regulation is consistent with the intent of the sign
code in allowing a more creative approach to signage and more integration of public art. The
murals would require a more specific agreement between the tenant and landlord that would not
be required by City Code. Typically the City would not review or approve murals/artwork on
private property which are not otherwise classified as signs. Murals already do not count
against allowed sign square footage since they are not allowed to advertise or promote a
particular business or product.
Non -conforming Signs
• Allowed per Code: Nonconforming signs are permitted to remain, but their relocation or
replacement is not permitted unless brought into conformance. Sign cabinets/faces may be
upgraded on nonconforming signs, but structural upgrades for freestanding signs would trigger
the requirement to be removed or converted into conforming signs. Nonconforming signs must
be removed if their use is discontinued for more than 60 days. If it is destroyed or damaged
more than 50 percent of its replacement cost, it must also be removed.
Proposed by applicant:
o There are two existing nonconforming signs proposed to remain, and one (the former
Walmart sign) that will be replaced by the Secondary Multi -tenant Sign.
o The two existing nonconforming signs to remain Applejack and Chili's will be
subject to a private agreement between the landlord and tenant that will dictate when it
needs to be replaced. The master sign plan allows both to remain.
o If a sign is damaged exceeding 33% the cost to replace the sign, it must be removed.
This is a lower threshold than the City's standard 50% replacement cost for the purpose
of achieving more unified signage.
Findings: Staff finds the proposed nonconforming sign regulations to be appropriate given the
existing conditions on the site. The former Walmart sign should have already been removed as
the Walmart use has been discontinued for more than 60 days. The site is currently an active
construction site and the sign will be removed as part of the site work for the reconstruction of
the parking lot, and replaced with the Secondary Multi -tenant sign. The sign code has
historically been generous in the protections of nonconforming signs, so from the City's
standpoint, the other two nonconforming signs could remain. The landlord may impose more
strict requirements upon the removal of the Chili's and Applejack sign by separate agreement
which the landlord would be responsible for enforcing.
As noted above, the site will comply with the signage standards in the City Code except as modified by
the master sign plan. For example, blade signs and temporary signs will all comply with the City's
standard regulations and therefore are not included in the master sign plan document.
IV. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff concludes that the subject property is eligible for a master sign plan and that the proposed plan
promotes well-planned and well-designed signage. Staff further finds that the sign plan is reasonable in
Planning Commission
Case No. WZ-18-23 /APSC Master Sign Plan
its requests particularly given the size of the development and is consistent with the intent of the
sign code. For these reasons, staff recommends approval of the site plan.
V. SUGGESTED MOTIONS
Option A:
"I move to APPROVE Case No. WZ-18-23, a request for approval of a master sign plan for a planned
commercial development (PCD) located on the east side of Youngfield Street between W. 32°d Avenue
and W. 38x' Avenue, for the following reasons:
1. The site is eligible for a master sign plan.
2. The master sign plan promotes well-planned and well-designed signage.
3. The master sign plan is consistent with the intent of the sign code and is appropriate for the
context of the development.
Option B:
"I move to DENY Case No. WZ-18-23, a request for approval of a master sign plan for a planned
commercial development (PCD) located on the east side of Youngfield Street between W. 32°d Avenue
and W. 38x' Avenue, for the following reasons:
1.
2. ...
Planning Commission
Case No. WZ-18-23 /APSC Master Sign Plan
EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL
%of
Wh Ra I ge
Geographic
Information Systems
Legend
O Subject Property
I + a
a..
I IVB
T171
I s
M$
- — - _ 32NDAVE`�
Hr
z
z
Planning Commission
Case No. WZ-18-23 /A PSC Master Sign Plan
- 35THFAVE 10�01 'ALM .w
8
EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP
Planning Commission
Case No. WZ-18-23 /A PSC Master Sign Plan
EXHIBIT 3: MASTER SIGN PLAN
See attached.
Planning Commission 10
Case No. WZ-18-23 /APSC Master Sign Plan
APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
AMENDMENT #17 - MASTER SIGN PLAN
AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,STATE OF COLORADO
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
The below signed owner(s), or legally designated agents) thereof,do
hereby agree that the property legally described hereon will be developed
in accordance with the rest no ti ors and condi ti ors contained in this plan,
and as may otherwise be required bylaw. I (we) further recognized that the
Approval of this Lester sign plan does not create a vested property right.
Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions
of Section 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge code of laws.
Will Damrath
By U.S. Retail Partners, LLC
A Delaware limited Ii abilitycompany
Its: Sole Member
By GRI Regency, LLC
A Delaware limited Ii abilitycompany
Its: Sole Member
By Regency Centers, L. P.,
A Delaware limited partnership
Its: Managing Member
By Regency Centers Corporation
A Florida corporation
Its: General Partner
By
Name: William J Damrath
State of Colorado )
)SS
County of
The foregoing instrument was Acknowledged
before me this day of --201 9
Witness my hand end official seal.
My c on missi on expires:
PLANNING COMMISSION
CERTIFICATE
Approved this day of ,2019
by
Wheat Ridge Planning Commission.
SIGN TYPES NOT PERMITTED
COUNTY CLERK AND
RECORDERS CERTIFICATE
StateofColoado )
) SS
County of Jefferson )
I hereby certifythat this plan was filed in the office ofthe County Clerk and
RecorderofleH rson CountyatGoideo,Colorado,at
o'clock—.M. on the day of_. 2019, in Book_
Page Reception No.
JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
Deputy
CITY CERTIFICATION
Approved this_ day of_ J 2019 by the City of Wheat
Ridge.
City Clerk
Mayor
Community Development Director
THE FOLLOWING SIGN TYPES ARE NOT PERMITTED:
I: Roof signs where the sign projects above the building facade parapet or roof structure.
ii: Individual wall mounted Box signs with plastic faces.
iii: Animated, flashing and/or audible signs.
IV: Portable, trailer
SITE DATA
PROJECT LOCATION ACREAGE
Applewood Village Shopping Center Approximately 3q 55 acres
W 32nd Ave & YoungfleldNE Corner
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 86633
GOVERNING CODES
City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado
Coda of Lawn, Chapter 26, Article VII Zoning. PCD
EXPLANATION OF DOCUMENT AND GENERAL
NOTES
A The purpose of this sign policy is to create a consistent, professional graphic envimment that also affords
the flexibility for tenant businesses to design and install distinctive signs that provide for evolving brand
identity need.
B. All tenant businesses aro required to install building signage to identify its promises.
C. No sign shall be erected in a location as to interfere with momrvehicle or pedestrian traffic or traffic signals.
D. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN THIS MASTER SIGN PLAN, ALL SIGNAGE ON THE PROPERTY
SHALL COMPLY WITH THE SIGN CODE (ARTICLE VIU OF CHAPTER 26 OF THE CITY OF
WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL CODE.
E. Shopping center businesses must obtain landlord approval before applying for a sign permit with
the City of Wheat Ridge.
CASE HISTORY
WZ-10-23 (MASTER SIGN PLAN)
WZ-14-09 (ODP)
VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE
058
NORTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING ALL OF LOTS 1 U ANO TRACT A, APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2, LOT 1,
APPLEW000 VILLAGE SOUTHWEST CORNER TOGETHER WITH UNPLATTEO PARCELS SITUATED WITHIN THE NORTHWEST ONECHARTER
OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 8TH PRINICPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT POPE, COUNTY
OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMECNNG AT THE CENTER CHARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29 ANO CONSIDERING THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID NORTHWEST CHARTER TO BEAR S89°29'2904 WTH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO;
THENCE N64°01'19'w A DISTANCE OF 358.]4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON THE
WESTERLY RIGHT OFWAY LINE OF WRIGHT COURT IA PUBLIC RIGHT OFWAY)ANO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT
A, APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2,
THENCE se9°29'29"W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT A, A DISTANCE OF 15500 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, APPLEWOOO VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2, SATO POINT ALSO BEING THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 22, APPLEW000 VILLAGE;
THENCE S00°54'01"E, ALONG TH LINE COMMON TO SAID LOTS 3 ANO 22, A DISTANCE OF 113.19 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OFWAYUNE OF WEST 32ND AVENUE IA PUBLIC RIGHT OFWAY)
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-oF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOURTEEN (14) COURSES.
1) N82°31'21'w A DISTANCE OF 83.]1 FEET;
2) N88°13'59"W A OISTANCE OF 72 137 FEET;
3) N88°14'22"W A 01 STANCE OF 58.35 FEET;
4) N04 °45'38"E, A DISTANCE OF ] 49 FEET;
5) 3891 A DISTANCE OF 96 86 FEET;
61558°0942"W A DISTANCE OF 14 67 FEET;
]I 389.01 A DISTANCE OF 12.50 FEET;
8) S00°24'32"E, A OISTANCE OF 8.00 FEET;
9) S89°0T49"E, A DISTANCE OF 125 48 FEET TO A POINT OF NONTANGENTCURVATURE;
10) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF AN ARC LENGTH OF 8.]6 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°48'54', ANO WHICH CHORD BEARS N26°35'55"W A DISTANCE OF 8 45 FEET.
11) Noo°11'28.1 W, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET;
12) S89°48'32"W, A DISTANCE OF 32.54 FEET;
13) S00 °54'01"E A DISTANCE OF 2.64 FEET;
14) S89°29'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 246 67 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT CURVATURE;
THENCE TRANSITIONING FROM THE SAID NORTH RIGHT -OFWAY OF WEST 32NO AVENUE TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF YOUNGFIELO STREET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH OF 58.65 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3].50 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89.361 ANO WHICH CHORD BEARS N45°42'15"W, A DISTANCE OF 52.85 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE SAM EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY of YOUNGFIELO STREET IA PUBLIC RIGHT UF-WAYI;
THENCE Noo°54'01 "W ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT UF -WAY, A DISTANCE OF 1223.8] FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH
LINE OF UNPLATTEO LANDS DESCRIBES AT RECEPTION NO. F1 790462,
THENCE ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SATO LOT 1 ANO SAID UNPLATTEO LANDS THE FOLLOWNG THREE (3) COURSES.
11 N89°25'1]'E, A DISTANCE OF 144.00 FEET;
21 NOR °54'01 "W A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET;
3) se9°28'1 ]•w, A DISTANCE OF 144.00 FEET TO SAM EASTERLY RIGHT OFWAYUNE OF YOUNG IELO STREET;
THENCE Noo°54'01 "W ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OFWAYUNE, A DISTANCE OF 13562 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE RIGHT;
THENCE TRANSITIONING FROM THE SAID EAST RIGHT -OFWAY OF YOUNGFIELO STREET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OFWAYOF
WEST 35TH AVENUE IA PUBLIC RIGHT -OF-WAY) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH OF240.55 FEET, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1 ]8.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ]]°25'48', ANO WHICH CHORD BEARS N37°48'53"E, A DISTANCE
OF 22266 FEET;
THENCE M6°31'47"E ALONG SATO SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 698.]] FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2 ANO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIOGEVIEW ACRES PRO FILING, FILED
IN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK ANO RECORDER'S OFFICE IN BOOK 23, PAGE14;
THENCE ALONG THE COMMON UNE BETWEEN SAID APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2 STARTING ALONG SAID
RIOGEVHW ACRES PRO FILING ANO ENDING AT SAM APPLEW000 VILLAGE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES.
1) Soo -46'08"E, A DISTANCE OF 666.2] FEET;
21 S89°2fi'1]"W A DISTANCE OF 068 FEET;
31300°53'19"E, A OISTANCE OF 896 32 FEET;
4) S48°30'24'E, A DISTANCE OF 234.05 FEET TO A NONTANGENTCURVE TO THE LEFT ANO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF SAID WRIGHT COURT;
THENCE ALONG SAM NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY ANO SAID CURVE To THE LEFT AN ARC LENGTH of 148.16 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 45 00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 188°38'41', ANO A CHORD WHICH BEARS S37° 10'15"W A DISTANCE OF 89 74 FEET;
THENCE S00°54'01 "E, CONTINUING ALONG SAID WRIGHT COURT, A DISTANCE OF 38.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SHEETINDEX
PAGE 1 of 4:
COVER SHEET
PAGE 2 of 4:
SIGN STANDARDS
PAGE 3 of 4:
Co
VJ
PAGE 4 of 4:
F
6
n
w
�
m
--__--
AVE
IN
pill
�INe
T
APPLEW000
W
i;
SHOPPING
SITE
v
CENTER
6 LL
s�
3YN0 AVE
NORTH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PARCEL OF LAND BEING ALL OF LOTS 1 U ANO TRACT A, APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2, LOT 1,
APPLEW000 VILLAGE SOUTHWEST CORNER TOGETHER WITH UNPLATTEO PARCELS SITUATED WITHIN THE NORTHWEST ONECHARTER
OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 8TH PRINICPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT POPE, COUNTY
OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS.
COMMECNNG AT THE CENTER CHARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 29 ANO CONSIDERING THE SOUTH LINE
OF SAID NORTHWEST CHARTER TO BEAR S89°29'2904 WTH ALL BEARINGS CONTAINED HEREIN RELATIVE THERETO;
THENCE N64°01'19'w A DISTANCE OF 358.]4 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING ON THE
WESTERLY RIGHT OFWAY LINE OF WRIGHT COURT IA PUBLIC RIGHT OFWAY)ANO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID TRACT
A, APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2,
THENCE se9°29'29"W ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT A, A DISTANCE OF 15500 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3, APPLEWOOO VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2, SATO POINT ALSO BEING THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 22, APPLEW000 VILLAGE;
THENCE S00°54'01"E, ALONG TH LINE COMMON TO SAID LOTS 3 ANO 22, A DISTANCE OF 113.19 FEET TO THE
NORTHERLY RIGHT OFWAYUNE OF WEST 32ND AVENUE IA PUBLIC RIGHT OFWAY)
THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT-oF-WAY LINE THE FOLLOWING FOURTEEN (14) COURSES.
1) N82°31'21'w A DISTANCE OF 83.]1 FEET;
2) N88°13'59"W A OISTANCE OF 72 137 FEET;
3) N88°14'22"W A 01 STANCE OF 58.35 FEET;
4) N04 °45'38"E, A DISTANCE OF ] 49 FEET;
5) 3891 A DISTANCE OF 96 86 FEET;
61558°0942"W A DISTANCE OF 14 67 FEET;
]I 389.01 A DISTANCE OF 12.50 FEET;
8) S00°24'32"E, A OISTANCE OF 8.00 FEET;
9) S89°0T49"E, A DISTANCE OF 125 48 FEET TO A POINT OF NONTANGENTCURVATURE;
10) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT OF AN ARC LENGTH OF 8.]6 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 9.50 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 52°48'54', ANO WHICH CHORD BEARS N26°35'55"W A DISTANCE OF 8 45 FEET.
11) Noo°11'28.1 W, A DISTANCE OF 2.00 FEET;
12) S89°48'32"W, A DISTANCE OF 32.54 FEET;
13) S00 °54'01"E A DISTANCE OF 2.64 FEET;
14) S89°29'29"W, A DISTANCE OF 246 67 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENT CURVATURE;
THENCE TRANSITIONING FROM THE SAID NORTH RIGHT -OFWAY OF WEST 32NO AVENUE TO THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF YOUNGFIELO STREET ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH OF 58.65 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3].50 FEET,
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89.361 ANO WHICH CHORD BEARS N45°42'15"W, A DISTANCE OF 52.85 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE SAM EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY of YOUNGFIELO STREET IA PUBLIC RIGHT UF-WAYI;
THENCE Noo°54'01 "W ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT UF -WAY, A DISTANCE OF 1223.8] FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH
LINE OF UNPLATTEO LANDS DESCRIBES AT RECEPTION NO. F1 790462,
THENCE ALONG THE COMMON LINE OF SATO LOT 1 ANO SAID UNPLATTEO LANDS THE FOLLOWNG THREE (3) COURSES.
11 N89°25'1]'E, A DISTANCE OF 144.00 FEET;
21 NOR °54'01 "W A DISTANCE OF 200.00 FEET;
3) se9°28'1 ]•w, A DISTANCE OF 144.00 FEET TO SAM EASTERLY RIGHT OFWAYUNE OF YOUNG IELO STREET;
THENCE Noo°54'01 "W ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT OFWAYUNE, A DISTANCE OF 13562 FEET TO A CURVE TO THE RIGHT;
THENCE TRANSITIONING FROM THE SAID EAST RIGHT -OFWAY OF YOUNGFIELO STREET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OFWAYOF
WEST 35TH AVENUE IA PUBLIC RIGHT -OF-WAY) ALONG SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT AN ARC LENGTH OF240.55 FEET, HAVING A
RADIUS OF 1 ]8.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF ]]°25'48', ANO WHICH CHORD BEARS N37°48'53"E, A DISTANCE
OF 22266 FEET;
THENCE M6°31'47"E ALONG SATO SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 698.]] FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF SAID APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2 ANO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIOGEVIEW ACRES PRO FILING, FILED
IN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK ANO RECORDER'S OFFICE IN BOOK 23, PAGE14;
THENCE ALONG THE COMMON UNE BETWEEN SAID APPLEW000 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER FILING NO. 2 STARTING ALONG SAID
RIOGEVHW ACRES PRO FILING ANO ENDING AT SAM APPLEW000 VILLAGE THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) COURSES.
1) Soo -46'08"E, A DISTANCE OF 666.2] FEET;
21 S89°2fi'1]"W A DISTANCE OF 068 FEET;
31300°53'19"E, A OISTANCE OF 896 32 FEET;
4) S48°30'24'E, A DISTANCE OF 234.05 FEET TO A NONTANGENTCURVE TO THE LEFT ANO THE NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY
OF SAID WRIGHT COURT;
THENCE ALONG SAM NORTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY ANO SAID CURVE To THE LEFT AN ARC LENGTH of 148.16 FEET, HAVING A RADIUS
OF 45 00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 188°38'41', ANO A CHORD WHICH BEARS S37° 10'15"W A DISTANCE OF 89 74 FEET;
THENCE S00°54'01 "E, CONTINUING ALONG SAID WRIGHT COURT, A DISTANCE OF 38.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SHEETINDEX
PAGE 1 of 4:
COVER SHEET
PAGE 2 of 4:
SIGN STANDARDS
PAGE 3 of 4:
SITE MAP
PAGE 4 of 4:
SIGN TYPE VISUAL REFERENCE
PREPARED By
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
A Delaware Limited Partnership
Its Managing Member
APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
AMENDMENT #17 - MASTER SIGN PLAN
AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,STATE OF COLORADO
SIGNAGE STANDARDS
SIGN TYPE
REQUIREMENT
FREESTANDING
A. Monument sign designs and locations will he consistent with the keymap and
MONUMENT SIGNS
elevations for monument signs within the shopping center.
B. Monument signs are freestanding signs that display multiple tenants an the sign.
(Definition per City Code)
Monument signs shall be located in the common area of the property to accomodate
advertisement for more than one tenant.
C. Changeable copy where allowed will change no more than every eight (8)
seconds.
D. All new freestanding signs shall be placed within landscaped areas.
E. Monument sign bases shall be consistent with materials of the primary structures.
F. Changeable Copy Signs are not permitted an freestanding single tenant signs.
G. a. Primary Multi tenant Sign:
1. Maximum number: 1
2. Maximum height: 50 feet
3. Minimum setback: 15' from public right of way
INFORMATIONAL
4. Maximum size: Refer to Sheet 4 (Sign Elevations)
WAYFINDING SIGNS
5. Changeable Copy Sign shall not occupy more than 25% of the sign
b. Secondary Multi tenant Sign:
(Definition per City Code)
1. Maximum number: 1
MURALS
2. Maximum height: 30 feet
3. Minimum setback: 1' from public right of way
4. Maximum size: Refer to Sheet 4 (Sign Elevations)
5. Changeable Copy Sign not permitted
c. Tertiary Multi tenant Sign:
1. Maximum number: 2
2. Maximum height: 10 feet
3. Minimum setback: 5' from public right of way
4. Maximum size: Refer to Sheet 4 (Sign Elevations)
5. Changeable Copy Sign shall not occupy more than 15% of the sign
6. Changeable Copy Sign not permitted an the 2nd Tertiary Sign
d. Freestanding Single Tenant Signs:
1. New freestanding single tenant signs are not permitted.
H. Freestanding signs may have a combined 1,200 square feet total. Max height 50 ft
(HIGHWAY ONLY)
SIGN TYPE
REQUIREMENT
WALL SIGNS
A. Signage placed an marquees, canopies or awnings are considered wall
(Definition per City Code)
signs and are calculated based upon the length of the wall to which they
are attached.
(Definition per City Code)
B. Signs shall not extend above the tap of the parapet or mansard irrespective
of the roof deck location or height.
C. Painted wall signs are not permitted.
D. Businesses shall be granted one 111 wall sign per eligible frontage. Eligible
frontages are those facing a public street, major interior drive or corner of
building unless otherwise approved by property management.
E. Lagos cannot exceed 30% of sign area and cannot exceed total letter height
of sign.
Allowable Size of Wall Signs
1. All tenants shall be allowed 1.5 square feet of wall signage per 1 linear foot
of stare frontage not to exceed 75% of the total linear stare frontage.
INFORMATIONAL
A. Maximum height of eight (8) feet.
WAYFINDING SIGNS
B. Maximum of ten (10) square feet of sign area.
C. Text, logo and arrows are allowed.
(Definition per City Code)
MURALS
Artwork not consisting of any businesses logo or name can be allowed with
property management approval. Murals do not count against tenant allowed
sign square footage.
SIGN TYPE
REQUIREMENT
NON -CONFORMING
A Relocation,replacement,rebuilding, enlargement or extension of a non conforming sign
SIGNS
is not permitted.
B. Existing non conforming freestanding signs:
(Definition per City Code)
Existing freestanding signs for Chili's restaurant at 3240 Yaungfield Street:
This freestanding sign may remain in place pursuant to this MASTER SIGN PLAN and
terms of private agreement between Landlord and Tenant.
Existing freestanding sign for Applejack Wine & Spirits at 3320 Yaungfield Street:
This freestanding sign may remain in place pursuant to this MASTER SIGN PLAN and
terms of private agreement between Landlord and Tenant.
C. If a non conforming sign suffers damage exceeding thirty three percent (33%) of the cast
to replace the sign, the sign may not be reconstructed and must be replaced with a sign
conforming to this MASTER SIGN PLAN.
Wall signs and other non conforming signs will be required to fallow the same criteria as
set forth above.
This criteria shall apply to Businesses that are within the property defined in the legal
description.
Building permits for non conforming sign repair are subject to Landlord approval prior to
submittal to this City.
PREPARED BY
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
A Delaware Limited Partnership
Its Managing Member
APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
AMENDMENT #17 - MASTER SIGN PLAN
AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSONSTATE OF COLORADO
SITE PLAN for GPPLEW999 VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTERLINE A
\\/ LU
L J i sxn AHI
p���� I
plll�
�11 Illf I rIs 1III
LT III
�.KK I I
1��� -- - - _ yLI� •IIITERTIAYMULTI-TENANT
_ ^ --- 1 ' ONUMENTSIGN
1 '�l iiilll I II IIII V 3G SOFT
TALL
1 VIII -11 1
FROM PROPERTY
IN
OF
5'FROM PROPERTY LINE
(POTENTIAL LOCATION
TERTIARY'MONUMENT
O UTENANT
10NLITEN
MANT
10II`lL-v�^Id�IYLIJp[ - I1111T1C1 III
30 SO FT
INSTALL A MINIMUM OF -r r 1 \'y11 C
5' FROM PROPERTY LINE
\ 0 - --_—_ raxreary
fixe
--- --- -----
NUNN LEEi.
EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN REGENCY CENTERS, L".
_________ _________ ______ _______ ______________w 11 ILLI, nom.a,, umlrea aaImx�mlx
rxnnrvxxsoxrvmmuxry __ It METRIC MISE,
mMEMOR uvexo' �r�
IR
30'MONUMENT SIGN '^'"°*"'ifPMONUMENT SIGN 50'TALL SIGN II III
�xF APPROX 173 89 FTII eV
• .... ..
----------------------------�1@P13YET SISE
0fi90-5fiF�-----_------_------------ II II
INSTALL WITH A MINIMUM I ME
PROPERTY LINE (REPLACES EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN
x�p xx3TATE
:09252018
of 4
APPLEWOOD VILLAGE SHOPPING CENTER PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT (PCD)
AMENDMENT #17 - MASTER SIGN PLAN
AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO
SITUATED IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER SECTION OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON,STATE OF COLORADO
21'-0" OAL
FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGN
PRIMARY MULTI -TENANT SIGN 1 - 50 FT
PS 1
APPROX. 596 SO. FT
DOTTED LINE REPRESENTS MAXIMUM
1BLE SIZE AND PLACEMENT FOR A ELECTRONIC
(ABLE COPY SIGN (25% OF SIGN AREA OR LESS)
IF HIGHER RESOLUTION)
13'- 10 318" OAL
FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGN -
SECONDARY MULTI -TENANT SIGN 2 - 30FT
SS 2
APPROX. 281 SO. FT
4'-6112"
3'- 10"
x
a
0
O
O
ST RCCTCRE MATERIAL AWMINUM
TYPE SBUARE TUBE
SIZE 2•; 2(ENG PEERING TO DETERMINE)
PAINT SHERWIN # ES 1070
FINISH ATIN
POLE COVER MATERIAL ALUMINUM
PAwT SHERWIN#Es1mo
FINISH SATIN
CABINET
BACKUP
NYLON
BACKUP
PUSH THRU MATERIAL N" CLEAR ACRYLIC (STOCK)
PROJECTION '6"
EDGEFNSH NIA
VINYL LAYER 151 SURFACE
COLOR 3M 363033 RED
STRUCTURE
FACE
LIGHTING
BASE COVER MATERIAL AWCOBOND
COLOR CHAMPAGNE MET ATTIC
01 FOOTING MATERIAL CONCRETE
SIZE AS RED RED PER ENGINEERING
MATERIAL
ALUMINUM WI ROUT -BUT FACES
uGHTING
MITE LED
PAINT
sw#sNlsoo
FINISH
SATIN
MATERIAL
ACRYLIC
BACKUP COLOR
#7328 MITE ACRYLIC
LAYER
ie)SURFAOE
COLOR
T.B.B. BY CUSTOMER
MATERIAL
ALUMINUM
TYPE
SQUARE TUBE
SIZE
ENGINEERING TO DETERMINE
PAINT
SHERWIN #E51070
FINISH
SATIN
RETAINER
1112"ALUMINUM
TYPE
POLYCARBONATE
COLOR
NMITE
TYPE
LEC WASH ILLUMINATION
SCPPLIER
YESCC
LIGHT COLOR
NMITE
BOLDED DOTTED LINE REPRESENTS MAXIMUM
ALLOWABLE SIZE FOR A ELECTRONIC GAS PRICE
CHANGEABLE COPY SIGN (15% OF SIGN AREA)
ZOMM OR HIGHER RESOLUTION)
NOTE: CHANGEABLE COPY SIGN ONLY PERMITTED
ON THE SOUTHERN TERTIARY MULTI TENANT SIGN
FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGN -
TERTIARY MULTI -TENANT SIGN 3 - 1 OFT
TS 3
APPROX. 29.3 SO. FT
PREPARED BY
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
A Delaware Limited Partnership
Its Managing Member
PAINT
SHERWIN WILLIAMS # ES 1676
PAINT
SHERWIN WILLIAMS # SN 1666
VINYL
3M STANDARD COLOR #3636-33 REB
FACE
MITE POLYCARBONATE
VINYL
#7725SE-324 FROSTED VINYL i ST SURFACE
UBSTRATE
AILCOBOND
COLOR
CHAMPAGNE METALLIC
NON
ETN NE
BOLDED DOTTED LINE REPRESENTS MAXIMUM
ALLOWABLE SIZE FOR A ELECTRONIC GAS PRICE
CHANGEABLE COPY SIGN (15% OF SIGN AREA)
ZOMM OR HIGHER RESOLUTION)
NOTE: CHANGEABLE COPY SIGN ONLY PERMITTED
ON THE SOUTHERN TERTIARY MULTI TENANT SIGN
FREESTANDING MONUMENT SIGN -
TERTIARY MULTI -TENANT SIGN 3 - 1 OFT
TS 3
APPROX. 29.3 SO. FT
PREPARED BY
REGENCY CENTERS, L.P.
A Delaware Limited Partnership
Its Managing Member
EXHIBIT 4: APPLICANT LETTER
Regency
Centers.
March 8, 2019
Scott Cutler
Planner II
City of Wheat Ridge
7500 W. 29'h Avenue
Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001
8480 East Orchard Road
Suite 6900
Greenwood Village. CO 80111
303 300 8300
RegencyCenters.com
Re: Letter of Request
Case No. WZ-18-23/ Applewood Village Master Sign Plan and Freestanding Signs
Dear Mr. Cutler:
Please accept our application for approval of a Master Sign Plan for the Applewood Village Shopping Center.
The Master Sign Plan includes four (4) freestanding signs in lieu of the City code that allows a maximum of two
freestanding signs per property. The rational for the two additional signs is as follows:
1) Applewood Village is the largest retail shopping center in Wheat Ridge with approximately 350,000 square feet
of buildings on roughly 40 -acres.
2) The property is atypical in that it has frontage on three streets, with over half a mile (3,362 linear feet) of street
frontage.
3) The close proximity of the shopping center to 1-70 enables it to draw from regional customers and travelers
alike. Traffic travels on 1-70 at high speed, so signage at the shopping center needs to be more substantial than
typical neighborhood retail properties in terms of the number of signs, the size and the height of signs in order to
attract prospective customers from I-70.
Regency Centers respectfully requests the Planning Commission's approval of the Master Sign Plan with four
freestanding signs.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Thomas Metzger
Senior Project Manager
Case No. WZ-18-231 Applewood Village Master Sign Plan
Planning Commission 11
Case No. WZ-18-23 /AVSCMaster Sign Plan
EXHIBIT 5: SITE PHOTOS
View of the site looking north on Youngfield Street. The existing freestanding sign can be seen in the
background, which would be replaced by the Primary Multi -tenant Sign and shifted east for a larger
setback from the street. The site is so large that the end of the site at W. 38' Avenue cannot be seen in
this photo, demonstrating the desire for additional signage.
Planning Commission 12
Case No. WZ-18-23 /AVSC Master Sign Plan