Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWA-19-01CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Tammy Odean, Secretary to the City of Wheat Ridge Board of Adjustment, do hereby certify that the following Resolution was duly adopted in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, on the 25th day of April 2019. CASE NO: WA -19-01 APPLICANT'S NAME: Amy Coffey WHEREAS, application Case No. WA -19-01 was not eligible for administrative review; and WHEREAS, the property has been posted the fifteen days required by law and in recognition that there were no protests registered against it; and WHEREAS, the relief applied for may be granted without detriment to the public welfare and without substantially impairing the intent and purpose of the regulations governing the City of Wheat Ridge; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Board of Adjustment application Case No. WA -19-01 be, and hereby is, APPROVED. TYPE OF VARIANCE: Request for approval of three variance on property located in the Residential -One C (R -1C) zone district: • Request A: a five-foot (100%) variance from the five-foot side setback requirement for the deck, resulting in a 0 -foot setback for the deck, • Request B: a two -foot six-inch (50%) variance from the five-foot side setback for an above ground pool resulting in a two -foot six-inch setback, and • Request C: a two -foot two-inch (36.1%) variance from the maximum allowed fence height of six -feet resulting in a privacy fence up to eight -foot two -inches in height. The eight -foot two -inches at the high point is due to a change of grade. FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. The variance would not alter the essential character of the locality. 2. The physical location of the home on the property and the topography both present a particular and unique hardship. 3. The alleged difficulty or hardship has not been created by any person presently having an interest in the property. 4. The request would not be detrimental to public welfare. 5. The therapy pool provides a reasonable accommodation for treatment of arthritis. 6. The majority of the variance criteria have been met. 7. Any other location would be more detrimental to the locality of the pool and deck. Board of Adjustment Page 1 8. The height of the west side privacy fence should cause no negative impact to the property owner to the west as that house is a significant distance to the north of the proposed deck and pool. WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The design of the deck, pool, and fence shall be consistent with the representations depicted in the application materials, subject to staff review and approval through review of a building permit. 2. Drainage shall be addressed to pull drainage away from neighboring property. 3. Consideration for placement of the pool and its impact on the sewer line shall be addressed with a new cleanout and appropriate inspections. VOTE: YES: ABBOTT, BELL, DE VRIES, GRIFFETH, HOVLAND, KUNTZ, RICHMOND, PAGE NO: ABSENT: BRADFORD ADOPTED and made effective this 25th day of April 25, 2019. Thomas Abbott, Chair Board of Adjustment Tammy Od , Secretary Board of Adjustment Board of Adjustment Page 2