Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06/11/2007 6:30 p.m. Pre-Meeting ~~!,~~~ CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING June 11. 2007 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF Mav 14. 2007 PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES Glory of God Lutheran Church 25th Anniversary of Naming the Church - June 17, 2007 CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK 1. Citizens, who wish, may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of 3 Minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster. 2. Citizens who wish to speak on Agenda Items, please sign the GENERAL AGENDA ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is called to be heard. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Item 1. CONSENT AGENDA A. RESOLUTION 16-2007 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) BE1WEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AND THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR COOPERATIVE MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,602.50. B. RESOLUTION 18-2007 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,716 FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE MODEL PROCESS FOR NUISANCE ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: June 11, 2007 Page -2- C. Approval of Architectural and Site Design Manual. D. Approval of RFP-07-16 Marketing and branding Project to Communication Infrastructure Group, LLC in the not to exceed amount of $30,490.00. E. Approval of RFP-07-04 Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) Telephony System to Milestone Networks in the Total Amount of $325,250.83. F. Approval of RFP-07-08 Insurance Broker Services to Insurance Management Associates, Inc. (IMA) of Colorado on a Commission Based Agreement. G. Ratification of the Metro Mayors Caucus Memorandum of Understanding. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING COUNCIL BILL 06-2007. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE- ENACTING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO SIGN CODE. COUNCIL BILL 07-2007, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO PROVIDE FOR THE ZONING OF SOCIAL CLUBS, AND COUNCIL BILL 08-200Z, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO INCLUDE A NEW ARTICLE XI CONCERNING THE LICENSING OF SOCIAL CLUBS. (CASE NO. ZOA-06-05) COUNCIL BILL 09-2007 -AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 5 AND 21 OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CONCERNING CERTAIN CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES. REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DRIVE THROUGH FACILITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3190 YOUNGFIELD STREET. (CASE NO. WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08) ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. COUNCIL BILL 10-2007 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 26- 711 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO THE REGULATION OF BILLBOARDS. COUNCIL BILL 11-2007: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, ENTITLED LICENSES, PERMITS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS REGULATIONS, SPECIFICALLY CODE SECTION 11-231 CONCERNING THE LICENSING OF MASSAGE THERAPISTS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROVISIONAL LICENSING OF MASSAGE THERAPISTS. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: June 11, 2007 COUNCIL BILL 12-2007: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING REAPPOINTING PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE CHRISTOPHER RANDALL AND INCREASING HIS BENEFITS AND HOURLY COMPENSATION. COUNCIL BILL 13-2007 - AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING A STRUCTURE LOCATE-D ON THEPROPERTY AT 9201 W 44TH AVENUE AS AN HISTORICAL LANDMARK. (CASE NO. WHL-07-01) COUNCIL BILL 14-2007 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16, ARTICLE III, SECTIONS 41 THROUGH 43 OF THE CITY CODE CONCERNING MISCELLANEOUS OFFENSES. COUNCIL BILL 15-2007 - AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A COMPETITIVE CABLE FRANCHISE APPLICATION, REVIEW AND EVALUATION PROCESS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY FRANCHISE APPLICATION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO ~76.41 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS. DECISIONS. RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS Item 8. Item 9. Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Page -3- RESOLUTION 15-2007 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR ADDITIONAL STUDY TO BE COMPLETED FOR THE WADSWORTH CORRIDOR SUBAREA PLAN IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $39,950.00. RESOLUTION 17-2007 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN JEFFERSON COUNTY, THE CITY OF ARVADA, THE CITY OF LAKEWOOD, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, THE CITY OF GOLDEN, AND THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A COUNTY-WIDE DOG LICENSING PROGRAM. CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS ADJOURNMENT mY'.,........' __.' .'. .. .' - , " ".' ,-' ','... , .. .:;;,'(.(,~i;~!!'!': ~ i~,:::::~' ", -; ".,. .. < . :' ",.' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Mav 14. 2007 Mayor DiTullio called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Council members present: Karen Adams, Karen Berry, Dean Gokey, Lena Rotola, Wanda Sang, Larry Schulz, Mike Stites, and Terry Womble. Also present: City Clerk, Michael Snow; City Manager, Randy Young; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; Director of Community Development, Alan White; Director of Public Works, Tim Paranto; Police Chief, Dan Brennan; Planner, Travis Crane; staff; and interested citizens. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF Aoril23. 2007 Motion by Council Member Schulz for the approval of the Minutes of April 23, 2007; seconded by Council Member Womble; carried 7-0, with Council Member Gokey abstaining due to his absence at the April 23, 2007 meeting. PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES Mayor DiTullio presented Proclamations for: Mental Health Month - May 2007. Mark Stone of the Jefferson Center for Mental Health accepted the proclamation and spoke of the JCMH services. National Police Week - May 13 - 19, 2007; Chief Brennan accepted the Mayor's proclamation and spoke in recognition of Police personnel and the services they provide. Muscular Dystrophy Association 2007 Wheat Ridge Goodwill Ambassador; Shawn Miller, the 2007 Muscular Dystrophy Wheat Ridge Goodwill Ambassador and a Second Grader at Kullerstrand Elementary, was on hand to accept the proclamation and to speak on behalf of citizens in the community with Muscular Dystrophy. CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK Cheryl Brungardt, expressed her displeasure with the recent acts of Council Member Womble. Roger Loecher spoke of similar and much worse things that have happened between Council Members in the past and that they have now moved on, and respect one another. He encouraged Council Members to work towards the same today. Mr. Loecher also expressed his belief that Council Members deserve a pay raise. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14, 2007 Page -2- David Berry spoke on the matter of Council Member Womble's false accusations of Council Member Berry's work performance and its threat to his family's well-being. Item 1. Consent Agenda A. CITY CONTRIBUTIONS TO OUTSIDE AGENCIES. B. AWARD ITB-07-34 2007 MINOR STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $284,917.80. C. AWARD CONTRACT SOQ-07-29 GIS IMPLEMENTATION PHASE IV IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,940.00. D. AWARD RFB-07-33 PANASONIC COMPUTER NOTEBOOKS TO PORTABLE COMPUTER SYSTEMS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $38,008.00. E. APPROVE INCREASE IN PROJECT CONTINGENCY FOR PROJECT ITB-06-35 YOUNGFIELD STREET, 38TH - 44TH AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,368.65. F. PAYMENT TO MURRAY DAHL KUECHENMEISTER & RENAUD FOR APRIL 2007 CITY ATTORNEY SERVICES IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,517.88. G. AWARD RFP-07-31, ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ASSESSMENT TO THE MERCER GROUP, INC. IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $42,070.00. H. RESOLUTION 15-2007 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR ADDITIONAL STUDY TO BE COMPLETED FOR THE WADSWORTH CORRIDOR SUBAREA PLAN IN THE AMOUNT OF $40,000.00. Consent Agenda was introduced and read by Council Member Stites. Council Member Gokey requested that items B, C, E, G and H be removed from the Consent Agenda. Motion by Council Member Stites for approval of the Consent Agenda items A, D and F; seconded by Council Member Womble; carried 8-0. Motion by Council Member Gokey to approve Consent Agenda Item B; seconded by Council Member Sang. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14, 2007 Page -3- Motion by Council Member Gokey to amend Consent Agenda Item B to strike the item and language for the speed bump at Panorama Park; seconded by Council Member Womble; failed 2-6; with Council Members Gokey and Womble voting Yes. Original Motion to approve Consent Agenda Item B carried 7-1 with Council Member Gokey voting No. Motion by Council Member Gokey to approve Consent Agenda Item C; seconded by Council Member Sang; carried 8-0. Motion by Council Member Sang to approve Consent Agenda Item E; seconded by Council Member Schulz; carried 8-0. Motion by Council Member Sang to approve Consent Agenda Item G; seconded by Council Member Stites; carried 7-1, with Council Member Womble voting No. Motion by Council Member Berry to approve Consent Agenda Item H; seconded by Council Members Schulz and Rotola. Louise Turner spoke in opposition of the additional funding for the Wadsworth Corridor Subarea study. Roger Laecher spoke in opposition to the additional funding and recommended Council and City Management arrange community meetings to discuss the community's needs and wishes for the Plan. Substitute Motion by Council Member Schulz to amend the original motion to bring Consent Agenda Item H to the May 21, 2007 Council Study Session for further discussion and study before approval; seconded by Council Member Sang; carried 5-3 with Council Members Rotola, Adams and Berry voting No. Original Motion, as amended, carried 5-3 with Council Members Rotola, Adams and Berry voting No. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING Item 2. COUNCIL BILL 02-2007 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE CODE OF LAWS CONCERNING THE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCESS. Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Council Bill 02-2007 was introduced on second reading by Council Member Sang, who read the executive summary. City Clerk Michael Snow assigned Ordinance No. 1383. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14, 2007 Page -4- Mr. White presented the staff report (attached to this packet). Duane Chesley spoke in support of the proposed amendment and urged Council to approve it tonight. Mayor DiTullio called for a recess at 8:40pm; resuming at 8:52. Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing. Motion by Council Member Sang to approve Council Bill 02-2007 (Ordinance 1383) on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Mrs. Rotola. Motion by Council Member Gokey to amend Section 2 of Council Bill 02-2007 such that the Community Development Director shall notify City Council of the date and location of all approved administrative variances of greater than 10%; seconded by Council Member Sang; tied 4-4 with Council Members Stites, Rotola, Adams and Berry voting No. Motion failed with Mayor DiTullio voting No. Motion by Council Member Gokey to postpone until after the adoption of the Architectural Manual; seconded by Council Member Womble; failed 3-5 with Council Members Womble, Gokey and Sang voting Yes. Alan White suggested the following amendments to Council Bill 02-2007: 1. Page 4, Paragraph D, [3.] to read: Will The special use will not create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning for the property. adversely aff::::t ~.r.:) adequate IigAt an= 2:~, :lor cause signifi:;z:-:t z1~, wmer or n:'c: ;::::Jllution. 2. Page 9, Paragraph C, to read: .. .intended character of the development and must provide enough information for the review bodies to determine how the property will be developed. 3. Page 10, Paragraph d, to read: A "to scale" sketch plan showing general indicatien of access to the property, areas to be landscaped, parking areas, building locations, buffering, pedestrian linkages on site and to adjacent sites, and any other design features such as plazas, courtyards, outdoor seating areas or other areas of interest. The drawing shall include existing conditions on properties adjacent to the proposed development, including but not limited to buildings, easements, landscaping, topography and other improvements. 4. Page 11, Item v, to read: Aerial perspective or "birds'-eye-view" image of the project showing building location, layout, bulk and height in three dimensions. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14, 2007 Page -5- 5. Page 17, Item b1, to read: The proposed final development plan conforms with the approved outline development plan and incorporates all recommended changes, modifications and conditions of approval imposed by City Council. 6. Page 18, Item c, to read: The Community Development Director may approve, deny or approve the proposed final development plan with conditions. In the case of a denial by the Community Development Director, or if the applicant objects to conditions of approval imposed by the Community Development Director, the applicant may appeal the decision to City Council at a public hearing within thirty (30) days of the decision. Council Member Sang affirmed her original motion to approve Council Bill 02-2007 and agreed to the amendments suggested by Alan White; seconded by Mrs. Rotola; carried 7-1 with Council Member Gokey voting No. Motion by Council Member Stites to adopt, as an Administrative Rule rather than as part of the Ordinance language, Council Member Gokey's original motion regarding Community Development Director notification to Council Members of Administrative Variances of more than 10%; seconded by Council Member Sang; carried 6-2 with Council Members Rotola and Adams voting No. Item 3. COUNCIL BILL 03-2007 - AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR , APPROVAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL ONE (C-1) TO PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD) AND FOR APPROVAL OF AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT LOT 2, CADENCE SUBDIVISION (CASE NO. WZ-06-11/BENTON). Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Council Bill 03-2007 was introduced on second reading by Mr. Womble who read the Executive summary. City Clerk Michael Snow assigned Ordinance No. 1384. Travis Crane presented the staff report (attached to this packet). Representing the applicant, Lucy Dinneen of DTF Benton LLC, spoke in favor ofthe rezoning and urged the Council to approve. Mrs. Dinneen informed Council that the property owner would agree to the following amendments to the proposed rezoning: 1. increase the 3-foot setback to 5 feet 2. designate only single-family development in the Plan. Charles Durbin and John Montoya spoke in opposition to the rezoning. Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing. Mayor called for a recess at 10:02pm, to resume at 10:1 Opm CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14, 2007 Page -6- Mr. Crane informed Council of the following additional conditions amenable to the property owner's agent, Lucy Dinneen: 1. Increase front-yard setback from 21.5 to 25 feet; 2. Increase percentage of brick on first floor of the East, street-facing side of the building to 100%. Rezoning/Outline Development Plan Motion by Council Member Womble to table indefinitely Council Bill 03-2007, thereby denying case number WZ-06-11, a request for rezoning from Commercial One to Planned Residential Development including an Outline Development Plan for property known as Lot 2 Cadence Subdivision for the following reasons: 1. The design is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The design is not consistent with the area. Motion seconded by Council Member Sang; failed 2-6 with Council Members Sang and Womble voting Yes. Motion by Council Member Berry to approve Council Bill 03-2007 as amended by Travis Crane, Case No. WZ-06-11, Ordinance No. 1384, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will be consistent with the existing surrounding land use. A residential structure will provide a buffer from the existing commercial development adjacent to West 38th Avenue. 2. The change in zone will not adversely affect the public health, safety or welfare, nor will it create an isolated or spot zone district. 3. The change in zone will be in conformance with several goals of the Comprehensive Plan, specifically providing quality, aesthetically pleasing housing, providing a variety of housing and development that is a contribution to and compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Motion seconded by Council Member Rotola. Council Members Berry and Rotola reaffirmed their Motion and Second, agreeing to the amendments previously mentioned by Mr. Crane: 1. The front-yard setback shall be increased to 25 feet. 2. The eastern elevation, for the first floor, shall be 100% brick fa9ade. Motion by Council Member Gokey to further amend the proposed rezoning to allow for a single-family home only; seconded by Council Member Sang; carried 5-3, with Council Members Stites, Rotola and Adams voting No. Original Motion by Council Member Berry to approve Rezoning and Outline Development Plan with the agreed amendments carried 8-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14, 2007 Page -7- Final Development Plan I Motion by Council Member Berry to approve the Final Development Plan, as amended to reflect the single-family residential designation, associated with Case No. WZ-06-11 for the property known as Lot 2 Cadence Subdivision for the following reasons: 1. The Final Development Plan is consistent with the Outline Development Plan. 2. The Final Development Plan meets the standards established in Chapter 26, Article III of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws; seconded by Council Member Rotola; carried 8-0. Item 4. COUNCIL BILL 04-2007 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO INCLUDE A NEW ARTICLE V, CONCERNING THE ADMINISTRATIVE MODEL PROCESS OF CERTAIN CODE OF LAWS PROVISIONS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 15 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO PROVIDE THAT A NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE V, SHALL CONSTITUTE A NOTICE TO ABATE A NUISANCE. Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Council Bill 04-2007 was introduced on second reading by Mr. Stites who read the executive summary. City Clerk Michael Snow assigned Ordinance No. 1385. Police Chief Dan Brennan presented the staff report. Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing. Motion by Council Member Stites to approve Council Bill 04-2007 (Ordinance 1385) on second reading and that it take effect June 15, 2007; seconded by Council Member Womble; carried 8-0. Item 5. COUNCIL BILL 05-2007, AN ORDINANCE APPROVING DISPOSITION OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF 38TH AVENUE AND HIGH COURT. Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing. Council Bill 05-2007 was introduced on second reading by Council Member Womble who read the executive summary. City Clerk Michael Snow assigned Ordinance No. 1386. Rob Osborn, Director of WR2020, presented the report. Motion by Council Member Schulz to continue the Council Meeting beyond the approaching 11 :OOpm hour; seconded by Council Members Adams and Sang; carried 7- 1 with Council Member Gokey voting No. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14,2007 Page -8- No citizens were present to speak. Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing. Motion by Council Member Womble to approve Council Bill 05-2007 (Ordinance 1386) on second reading and that it take effect immediately upon adoption; seconded by Council Members Gokey and Rotola; carried 8-0. ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING Item 6. COUNCIL BILL 06-2007, AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE- ENACTING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO SIGN CODE. Council Bill 06-2007 was introduced on first reading by Mr. Schulz. Motion by Council Member Schulz to approve Council Bill 06-2007 on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, June 11, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Council Member Rotola; carried 8-0. Item 7. COUNCIL BILL 07-2007, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO PROVIDE FOR THE ZONING OF SOCIAL CLUBS, AND COUNCIL BILL 08-2007, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO INCLUDE A NEW ARTICLE XI CONCERNING THE LICENSING OF SOCIAL CLUBS, CASE NO. ZOA-06-05. Council Bill 07-2007 was introduced on first reading by Council Member Sang. Motion by Council Member Sang to approve Council Bill 07-2007 and Council Bill 08- 2007 on first reading, order them published, public hearing set for Monday, June 11, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, and that they take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Council Member Schulz; carried 8-0. Item 8. COUNCIL BILL 09-2007 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 5 AND 21 OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CONCERNING CERTAIN CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES. Council Bill 09-2007 was introduced on first reading by Council Member Schulz. Motion by Council Member Schulz to approve Council Bill 09-2007 on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, June 11, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by Council Member Sang; carried 8-0. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: May 14, 2007 Page -9- CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS Concerning the Reappointment of Municipal Judge Randall, Mr. Dahl asked Council for input as to whether they would prefer to meet with Judge Randall during a Study Session prior to considering a Council Action to reappoint, or whether they would like to immediately consider reappointment at a subsequent Council Meeting. Motion by Council Member Stites to instruct Mr. Dahl to bring a reappointment package to Council on the June 11, 2007 Council Meeting; seconded by Council Member Gokey; carried 8-0 ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS City Clerk Michael Snow informed Council and viewers that State Senate Bill 045, Concerning Open Records Retrieval Fees, was passed by the Legislature and signed by the Governor on April 19, 2007. The Bill, which limits per-page fees to $.25 for such records to be produced, does not, however, go into affect until August 8th, at the soonest. Therefore, the City of Wheat Ridge will maintain its $.50 per-page fee until that time. Motion by Council Member Gokey to adjourn; seconded by Council Member Sang; tied 4-4 with Council Members Adams, Berry, Rotola, and Schulz voting No. Mayor DiTullio broke the tie by voting yes. Motion carried 5-4. Meeting adjourned at 11 :06 p.m. ~ Michael Snow, City Clerk APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JUNE 11, 2007 BY A VOTE OF _ to Mike Stites, Mayor pro tem The preceding Minutes were prepared according to ~47 of Robert's Rules of Order, i.e. they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD's of the meetings are available for listening or viewing in the City Clerk's Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions. PROCLAMATION GLORY OF GOD LUTHERAN CHURCH SIB Annlve..... of N.mln. the Chu.ch June 17, 2007 WHEREAS, this unto itself may not seem unusual for a church to reach a 25th anniversary, but in this particular case it is unique and significant; and j W l1.I!;KEAS, three Lutheran Churches from two different Synods after many years merged to become one in the State of Colorado and named itself Glory of God Lutheran Church, Saint Timothy and Agape both from the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod, formed a partnership to become Gloria Dei located on 32nd and Zinnia, Gloria Dei then formed a partnership with Saint Mark Lutheran Churc;h from the Lutheran Church of America, located on 38th Avenue near Ward. These three congregations successfully formed a partnership and became a strong Lutheran witness in the community; and WHEREAS, the congregation formalized the name to Glory of God Lutheran Church in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (formerly LCA), in June 1982. Since that time, this unified congregation has met at its present location 12200 West 38th Avenue, Wheat Ridge Colorado 80033; and '" l1.I!;KEAS, the church serves the community of Wheat Ridge by hosting the Habitat for Humanity Pumpkin Patch, Life Line Screening, Flu Shots administered by Mile High Health Team, renowned photographer John Fielder's presentations, and the church is used by groups such as: North Metro Developmentally Disabled Group, School Groups, Boy and Girl Scout Troops and various teachers use the church for student tutor sessions. NOW, THEREFORE, the Mayor and City Council for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, do hereby recognize and applaud Glory of God Lutheran Church on its 25th Anniversary of Naming the Church, congratulate the church body on 25 years of community dedication and service. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and Seal of the City of Wheat Ridge this day of 2007. Michael Snow, City Clerk IIJ;JJ~ ~~,.'...H'" > 1'/ ~ a - 0 u m C'Ol.ORJ>.,QO ITEM NO: l. 1\. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION , .~ ~. -",-&f ('a~' ~~l ~{::~~~ m ill W!I. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11,2007 TITLE: RESOLUTION 16-2007 - A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AND T.liE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR COOPERATIVE MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,602.50 o PUBLIC HEARING o BIDS/MOTIONS l8J RESOLUTIONS o ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date) o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND'READING Quasi-Judicial: 0 f?t~iJ1J l8J No ( ~Q..:)rd City 11ana~ 6' EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: To effectively deal with the continuing threat of mosquito borne transmission of West Nile Virus the Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment (JCDHE) has contracted with OtterTail Environmental for integrated mosquito management. Mosquito season is generally May through September in Colorado with peak activity months being July and August. Although we cannot predict how severe West Nile virus season will be this year, a typically wet spring, followed by a hot summer, can increase the population of infected mosquitoes. JCDHE will be working with OtterTail Environmental to control the mosquito species that can cany West Nile Virus. The primary means of control will be to monitor habitat suitable for mosquitoes throughout the county and eliminate larvae before they become adult mosquitoes. The services are detailed in the attached IGA. OtterTail Environmental will provide Integrated Mosquito Management (IMM) services which include identification and classification of mosquito breeding habitat, surveillance of adult and larval mosquitoes, larval mosquito control (application of larvicides, source reduction, and/or biologic controls), and public education and outreach. Adulticiding - the killing of adult mosquitoes through aerial sprays and fogging - is not anticipated but the contractor shall maintain the capabilities to implement, manage, and provide properly trained staff and supervisors to conduct adulticiding if requested by JCDHE to do so. The proposed contract amount does not include the cost for adulticiding. cOMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDA nON: None. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: None ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: An alternative would be for the City to coordinate its own prevention and control program. While this is an option, it would neither be cost effective nor an effective countywide operation. In addition, the City would be responsible for identifying and mapping the affected areas, outreach and information to all residents and for applying any necessary larvicides and insecticides. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Jefferson County and the City of Wheat Ridge share the expense for mosquito control equally. Total cost for full prevention and control services in Wheat Ridge is $13,205.00, the same as last year. Wheat Ridge's portion of this expense is $6,602.50. Funds have been budgeted and are available in the Central Charges Division of the General Fund. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution 16-2007 - A Resolution Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement (lGA) Between the Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment and the City of Wheat Ridge for Cooperative Mosquito Management Program in the Amount of $6,602.50." or, "I move to table indefinitely Resolution 16-2007 for the following reason(s) " Report Prepared by: Patrick Goff, Deputy City Manager Reviewed by: Randy Young, City Manager Attachments: 1. IGA with Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment (JCDHE) 2. Resolution 16-2007 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR COOPERATIVE MOSOT}ITO MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TillS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into and effective as of the _ day of .2007, between the JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, whose address is 1801 19th Street, Golden, CO 80401, hereinafter referred to as the "Health Department"; and the CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, a municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, with its principal office located at 7500 W. 29th Ave, Wheat Ridge, CO, hereinafter referred to as "Wheat Ridge." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the objective of public health mosquito control is to prevent the mosquito-borne transmission of diseases to humans, livestock, and domestic pets, and in order to effectively deal with the continuing threat of mosquito-borne transmission of West Nile Virus and other arboviral diseases, the Health Department has contracted with OtterTail Environmental, Inc., ("OtterTail") for Integrated Mosquito Management ("IMM") services within certain areas of Jefferson County, Colorado, during the year 2007; these services shall be provided to Jefferson County and various municipalities within Jefferson County at a cost per square mile basis, and WHEREAS, said IMM services are detailed in a document entitled PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT, signed April 17, 2007, which includes the scope of work, the service area map, the mosquito surveillance plan, the sentinel zone protocols, and a copy of the signed confidentiality statement; a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment A, and WHEREAS, for a price to be paid to OtterTail by Wheat Ridge through payment to the Health Department, OtterTail, through the direction of the Health Department, will perform the IMM services as detailed in Attachment A for an area of appw,.illtately 9.5 square miles located within the boundaries of Wheat Ridge; and WHEREAS, the parties now desire to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement so as to memorialize their agreement with respect to their respective responsibilities regarding the provision of such IMM services within Wheat Ridge's boundaries. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. PROVISION OF IMM SERVICES ,,",Ul1ll>l WHEAT RIDGE: Upon the signing of this Intergovernmental Agreement by the parties hereto, the Health Department will direct OtterTail, during the year 2007, to perform the IMM services set forth in Attachment A for an area of approximately 9.5 square miles located within the boundary of Wheat Ridge. The services and service fee do not include adulticide services. The Health Department will monitor the need for adulticiding and will advise the County and all participating municipalities if an adulticide program is recornmended and approved by the Board of Health and Board of County Commissioners. Page 1 of3 A I TACHMENT 1 2. PROVISION OF OTHER IMM SERVICES BY WHEAT RIDGE: Wheat Ridge shall designate a point of contact for communication with the Health Department; provide public education to their citizens; refer citizen complaints to OtterTail; coordinate with the Health Department on IMM services or concerns; and advise the Health Department, by report, of the IMM services, if any, conducted or directed by Wheat Ridge. The IMM service reports shall be submitted on a monthly basis on or before the 5th of the month effective July 2007 and ending October 2007. The monthly IMM service report, with the notation "re: West Nile IGA Report", shall be sent to Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment, 1801 19th Street, Golden Colorado 80401. 3. MONITORING THE PROVISION OF IMM SERVICES: Staff from the Health Department will monitor the work of OtterTail and Wheat Ridge to ensure that the IMM services detailed in Paragraph 1 and 2 above are fulfilled. The Health Department will be responsible for coordinating between OtterTail and Wheat Ridge for the delivery ofIMM services detailed in Attachment A. As needed, the Health Department will provide Wheat Ridge with public education information and periodic reports regarding the status of mosquito-borne diseases and vector control. Questions regarding the Health Department's IMM services shall be through Dr. James Dale, Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment, 1801 19th Street, Golden, Colorado, 80401; PHONE: 303-271- 5718; FAX: 303-271-5702; EMAIL: idale@ieffco.us. 4. PAYMENT OF WHEAT RIDGE IMM SERVICE FEE: Wheat Ridge agrees to pay to the Health Department six thousand six hundred two and 5011 00 dollars (6,602.50) which is equal to 50 percent of the total Wheat Ridge IMM service fee of thirteen thousand two hundred five dollars ($13,205.00) to reimburse the Health Department for Wheat Ridge's share of the IMM services performed by OtterTail. After execution of this Intergovemmental Agreement by the last party, Wheat Ridge shall pay the Health Department in three equal payments of two thousand two hundred and 83/100 dollars ($2,200.83) in response to July, August and September invoices from the Health Department. The payment, with a notation "re: West Nile IGA", shall be sentto Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment, 1801 19th Street, Golden Colorado 80401. 5. PAYMENT OF UNIcORPORATED JEFFERSON COUNTY IMM SERVICE FEE: The Health Department will pay for and direct OtterTail to perform the IMM services as set forth in Attachment A located within unincorporated Jefferson County. 6. TERM;: The term of this IU;"'5v ..emmental Agreement shall be from the date of signature by the last party hereunder to and until December 31, 2007. 7. LIABILITY INSURANCE cOVERAGE/INDEMNITYIWARRANTY: As described in Paragraphs 5 and 6 of the PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT, OtterTail shall maintain liability insurance coverage and will hereby indemnify and hold the Health Department and Wheat Ridge hannless from all claims, damages, loss, injury, cost and expense, including attorneys' fees resulting from or related to any negligent or intentional acts or omissions of OtterTail, its agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants, in its P",iUHUance of the agreement. A copy of Otter Tail's Certificate of Liability Insurance is provided as Attachment B. 8. NO GUARANTEE BY THE HEAL TH DEPARTMENT: Wheat Ridge acknowledges that Page 2 of3 although the objective ofthe IMM services to be performed within Wheat Ridge's boundaries by OtterTail is to reduce the mosquito population and the consequent threat of transmission of West Nile Virus, the Health Department makes no guarantee as to the effectiveness of such IMM services in achieving such objective. 9. ~NTIRE AGREEMENT: This writing constitutes the entire Intergovernmental Agreement between the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter herein, and shall be binding upon said parties, their officers, employees, agents and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of the respective survivors, heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns of said parties. 10. NO WAIVER OF IMMUNITY: No portion of this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be deemed to constitute a waiver of any immunities the parties or their officers or employees may possess, nor shall any portion of this Intergovernmental Agreement be deemed to have created a duty of care which did not previously exist with respect to any person not a party to this Intergovernmental Agreement. 11. NO l111KD PARTY BENEFICIARY ENFORCEMENT: It is expressly understood and agreed that the enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Intergovernmental Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the undersigned parties and nothing in this Intergovernmental Agreement shall give or allow any claim or right of action whatsoever by any other person not included in this Intergovernmental Agreement. It is the express intention of the undersigned parties that any entity other than the undersigned parties receiving services or benefits under this Intergovernmental Agreement shall be an incidental beneficiary only. Signed by the parties' the day of .2007. Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment By: By: Secretary to the Board of Health President Board of Health ATTEST: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, a municipal corporation of the STATE OF COLORADO By: City/Town Clerk By: Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: City Attorney Page 3 of3 ( PURCHASE OF SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, dated for reference purposes only the 30th day of March, 2007, is made and entered into by and between the Jefferson County Department of HeaIth and Environment (JCDHE), 180119th Street, Golden, CO 80401, hereinafter referred to as nJCDHE", and OtterTaiI Environmental, Inc., 1045 N. Ford Street, Golden, CO 80401, hereinafter referred to.as "Contractor." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, JCDHE is interested in contracting with a professional to provide public health integrated mosquito management services for the purpose of preventing and controlling mosquito-borne diseases such as West Nile Virus and West Equine Encephalomyelitis; and WHEREAS, the Contractor desires to provide those services to JCDHE, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto covenant and agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall be in effect for the period April 17 , 2007 through December 31, 2007. 2. RESPONSffiILITffiS These are defined in the Integrated Mosquito Management Program, Jefferson County, Colorado, Scope of Work, General Description and Specifications (Eight pages plus Attachments A,B, and C) that are ,attached as Exhibit A. 3. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT a. JCDHE will reimburse the Contractor a total of$213,226 in 5 equal monthly payments starting in June, 2006. Contractor services will be documented and app,vved prior to authorization for payment. The final or fifth payment will be made after the completion and appw val of all contract requirements. b. Contractor shall submit a monthly invoice to JCDHE by the 5th of the following month of service. Failure to submit billing information in a timely manner and correct format shall result in non- payment of invoice. c. Contractor shall be reimbursed within fourteen (14) days after receipt and "ee.~ ~a1 of the invoice. 4. CONFIDENTIALITY a. In performing services under the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contractor agrees to comply with all JCDHE confidentiality requirements. Contractor must sign and retnffi tbe Statement of Confidentiality, attached as Exhibit B, with the Purchase of Services Agreement. II II Ii ( Purchase of Services Agreement, Public Health Integrated Mosquito Management Services Page 2 5. ,INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR STATUS. PAYMENT OF TAXES AND INSURANCE; COVERAGE a: In performing services under this Agreement the Contractor is acting as an independent contractor and not as an agent or employee of JCDHE. b. As an independent contractor, the Contractor is solely liable and responsible for maintaining v, v.:"... 's compensation insurance which complies with statutory requirements in the State of Colorado; unemployment fusurance benefits, and the withholding and payment of any and all federal, state and local taxes applicable to the receipt of funds or other consideration by the Contractor under the terms of this Ae>"'''''uent. 6. INDEMNIFICATION, a. Contractor hereby indemnifies and holds JCDHE and the municipalities in Jefferson County harmless from all claims, damages, loss, injury, cost and expense, including attorneys' fees resulting from or related to any negligent or intentional acts or omissions of the Contractor, its agents, employees, subcontractors and consultants, in its performance of this Agreement. This provision shall survive the termination of this Agreement. , 7. INSURANCE a. In performing services under this Agreement, the Contractor shall submit a certificate of insurance to JCDHE establishing the Contractor has professional liability insurance provided by an insurance carrier licensed to do business in the State of Colorado and meets or exceeds JCDHE minimum insurance requirements. 8. NON ASSIGNMENT a. Neither this Agreement nor any interest therein, or any claim thereunder, shall be assigned by the Contractor to any third person without the prior written consent of JCDHE. 9. ,OFFICIALS NOT TO BE~!',l:' II a. No elected or employed member ofJCDHE shall directly or indirectly receive or be paid any share or part of this Agreemeiltor any benefit that may arise thereof. the Contractor warrants that it has not retained any company or person (other than a bona fide employee working solely for the Contractor) to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that the Contractor has not paid or agreed to pay to any company or person, (other than a bona fide employee working for the Contractor), any fee, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award of this Agreement to the Contractor. Upon learning of any breach or violation of this provision, JCDHE shall have the right to terminate this Agreement with no further liability or obligation for payment. Purchase of Services Agreement, Public Health Integrated Mosquito Management Services Page 3 10. J<;MPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY USE OF COLORADO LABOR ILLEGAL ALIENS a. The Contractor shall not refuse to hire, discharge, promote, demote or discriminate in matt~rs of compensation against any person otherwise qualified, solely because of race, creed, sex, color, national origin or ancestry, disability or age. The Contractor shall not knowingly empioy unauthorized aliens to perform any portion of the Agreement and shall comply with the provisions of the hnmigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. 11. NON-APPROPRIATION a. The payment of JCDHE's obligations hereunder in the fiscal years subsequent to the Agreement period are contingent upon funds for this Agreement being appropriated and budgeted. Iffunds for this Agreement are not "l'l'LUl'L;ated and budgeted in any year subsequent to the fiscal year of the execution of this A&......~ent, this Agreement shall terminate. JCDHE's fiscal year is the calendar year. 12. STATUTES. REGULATIONS AND ORDINANCES a. The Contractor shall observe and comply with federal, state and local laws, regulations, rules or ordinances that affect those employed or engaged by it, the materials or equipment used or the performance of the project and shall procure any and all necessary approvals, licenses and permits all at its own expense. 13. SEVERABILITY a. If any provision of this Agreement or the application thereofto any person or in any circumstance shall be unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this A",...........ent and the application of such provision to other persons or in other circumstances shall not be effected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law. 14. ENTIRE AGREEMENI: This Agreement and Exhibits constitute the entire Agreement among the partners and all other and prior Agreements among the parties relating to such subject matter are hereby cancelled and superseded in their entireties. No variations, modifications or changes herein or hereof shall be binding upon any party hereto u.'1les3 set forth in a document duly ex;;;cu,cd by :;ueh pad:y. ( ( Purchase of Services Agreement, Public Health Integrated Mosquito Management Services Page 4 IN "Wl'fNESS ~/T1 WHEREOF, the parties ~erero have duly executed be effective as of J./; I 7 '7 . this Agreenient as of JJ;,!'!'J;,RSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT ;di~ J CONTRACTOR ~_J Cathy Corcoran, President Board of Health ArrEST: By: OJ...., 0(/1 SSN I EIN , A.ttacbtllent A. ( ( EXHIBIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK GENERAL DESCRIPTION AND SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL DESCRIPTION The service provider shall conduct an Integrated Mosquito Management (IMM) Program for Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment (JDCHE) during the spring, summer and fall of 2007. This program will be designed and implemented to control the spread of the West Nile Virus (WNV) and other mosquito-borne diseases such as Western Equine Encephalitis (WEE) by reducing the number of disease causing , mosquitoes. The service provider shall employ established IMM principles and practices to reduce the numbers of disease causing mosquitoes in Jefferson County. These principles and practices include: identification and classification of mosquito breeding habitat, surveillance of adult and larval mosquitoes, larval mosquito control (application of larvicides, source reduction, and/or biologic controls), and public education' and outreach. Adulticiding - the killing of adult mosquitoes through aerial sprays and fogging - is not anticipated but the service provider shall maintain the capabilities to implement, manage, and / or provide properly trained staff and supervisors to conduct adulticiding if requested by JCDHE to do so. , The service provider shall provide the following IMM services within the service area: A. Adult Mosquito Surveillance B., Larval Mosquito Surveillance and Control C. Public Education D. Reporting E. Record Keeping F. Adult Mosquito Control Service Coordination G. Department Employee Training H. Board of Health Appearances The service provider shall follow all applicable and appropriate Federal, State, and Local rules and regulations such as EPA, OSHA, FIFRA and the like pertaining to the implementation of the IMM services provided by the service provider in this Scope of Work. The service area is generally described as the "plains" area of Jefferson County Colorado and consists of approximately 153 square miles. Specific requirements pertaining to the service area, the services to be provided, term of the contract, and the work products are described in the Specifications section of this Scope of Work. 2007 IMM SOW FINAL SA,doc Page 1 of8 ( ( EXHIBIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreem(\nt: SCOPE OF WORK SPECIFICATIONS I. SERVICE AREA The service area is generally described as the "plains" area of Jefferson County bounded by Broomfield County on the north, Chatfield State Park on the south, Sheridan Boulevard on the east, and the Hogback on the west. The 2006 Integrated Mosquito Manag~mentService,Area Map (Attachment A) illustrates the service area and the known potential larval development (PLD) sites, A summary of the service area is provided in the table below. Areal Municioalit\(, Unincorporated Jefferson County Edgewafer , Lakeside Littleton. MQrrison . Mountairi VieW Golden Wheat Ridge Lakewood Bow Mar Arvada Total Square Miles: Sai.lare Miles 77.2 0.7 0,3 0.6 1.2 0.1 9.3 9.5 26.7 0.3 27.5 153.4 , II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED A. Adult Mosauito Surveillance 1. The service provider shall provide all supplies, equipment and personnel to operate and maintain: a) Sixteen (16) CDC light traps at various sites selected with the concurrence of JCDHE within the service area. These traps shall be operated one night per week on the same day of the week for a period of13 weeks from June 4, 2007 to August 31, 2007 b) Nine (9) gravid traps at sites selected with the concurrence of JCDHE within the service area. The gravid trap sites mayor may not coincide with the CDC light trap sites identified in paragraph a) above. These traps shall be operated one night per week on the same day of the week for a period of 13 weeks from June 4, 2007 to August 31 , 2007. 2007 IMM SOW FINAL SA.doc Page 2 of 8 ( EXHmIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK c) Five (5) traps, included in paragraphs A, 1, a & b above, a second night each week during the period of June 25, 2007 through August 10, 2007 as part of the Mosquito Sentinel Program in accordance with state guideline,s. The Mosquito Sentinel Program trap locations will be designated by JCDHE in collaboration with the service provider. 2. If for any reason, such as inclement weather, any of the trap nights described in paragraph a, b, and/or c above is cancelled, the service provider shall notify JCDHE immediately. JCDHE may require the service provider to resche,dule the cancelled trap night as conditions allow. 3. After each trap night the service provider shall collect, identify, speciate, and count all trapped mosquitoes by methods recognized by CDC and/or the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) and report this information to JCDHE at least once per week. '. 4. All' mosquito trapping activities including the submission of mosquito pool specimens shall be conducted in accordance with the protocols established in the current CDPHE Mosquito Surveillance Plan. A copy of the CDPHE 2005 Mosquito Surveillance Plan and West Nile Virus Mosquito Testing 2007 Sentinel Zone Protocol are provided in Attachment Band C respectively. CDPHE updates or changes to these plans will provided by JCDHE to the service provider. > 5. The service provider shall assume all liability for the placement and operation of any and all equipment. JCDHE shall not be responsible for any lost, damaged or stolen traps and/or equipment. 6. The service provider shall maintain a toll-free (in Colorado) telephone line and shall accept calls from the public reporting mosquito problems and/or standing, stagnant water in the service area that may indicate the presence of PLD sites. The service provider shall maintain a log of calls received and shall summarize call activity in weekly and annual reports. B. larval Mosauito Surveillance and Control: The primary and priority focus of , larval control will be for tnose mosquitoes competent to transmit diseases such as WNV. All mosquito complaints shall be thoroughly investigated and larval control implemented based a balanced evaluation of risk associated with concurrent infestation with mosquitoes presenting a public health problem and impact on quality of life in the community. Initial Inspection of PLD Sites: By June 21, 2007 the service provider shall condL:ct an initial inspection of all knovJi1 PLD sites wiih:n the service area. At the end of the 2006 IMM season there were approximately 600 known PLD sites 2007 IMM SOW FINAL SA,doc Page 3 of 8 ( EXHmIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK contained in the 153.4 square mile service area. The 2007'IMM service area and known PLD sites are identified on the Jefferson County Integrated Mosquito Management Service, Area Map (Attachment A). The purpose of the initial PLD inspection is to classify each PLD site as "targeted" or "non-breeding". Targeted PLD sites are those sites which have the highest potential for mosquito breeding. The remaining sites shall be classified as non-breeding PLD sites or removed from the list of PLD sites if the site no longer has the potential to breed mosquitoes. Any new PLD sites identified during the initial inspection of PLD sites shall be added to the list of PLD sites and shall be classified as "targeted" or "non-breeding". On or before June 30, 2007 the service provider shall provide an updated list, based on the previous end-of..;season PLD inventory, of all PLD sites and their classification. The list shall include the serv,ice provider's recommendations for additions, deletions, and/or revisions to the list of PLD sites. 1. Larval Mosquito Surveillance' and' Control: Upon completion and/or commensurate with the initial inspection of designated PLD sites, the service provider shall commence the following routine PLD surveillance and larval control activities: , a) T~rgeted sites shall be inspected at least once per week by visual observation and by dipping any standing water for mosquito larvae. b) Non-breeding sites shall be inspected based on changes in climactic conditions but at least once per month to determine if any changes have occurred that would warrant a re-evaluation of their status. c) Storm water structures shall be inspected based on environmental conditions that could promote the development of mosquito larva at such structures. Strategically lo,cated storm water structures (catch basins, detention ponds, storm water inlet boxes, and the like) shall be inspected at least once per week for the presence of mosquito larvae. The results of the storm water structure inspections shall be included in the weekly totals and year to date totals in the weekly reports. , d) During the course of conducting IMM activities, identify any additional and/or new PLD sites by noting any areas of clogged ditches and streams, standing water, etc., and inspect and classify each additional and/or new PLD site as a targeted or non-breeding site. All additional and/or new PLD sites shali be mapped and recorded, regardless of their classification. Note such features as abandoned swimming pools, etc., which have the potential for supporting iarval devalopment, report these features to 2007 IMM SOW FINAL SAdoc Page 4 of8 ( EXHIBIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK JCDHE, and work with local code enforcement officials to locate, identify, and apply the appropriate IMM measures to these sites. e) If it is determined that any PLD site in a, b, c, and/or d above are producing Culex sp. or other potential arboviral vector mosquitoes, apply the appropriate, federally approved materials, such as but not limited to 180-day briquettes, 30-day residual pellets, granular larvicides, monomolecular oils, etc. and/or utilize other recognized methods of larval control such as source reduction. f) Use tt)e most appropriat~ method.for larvicicl~,distribution, sucl'\ as hand application, backpack broadcasters, All Terrain Vehicle (ATV), etc. g) Maintain Material Safety Data (MSD) sheets for all products used and provide such information upon request to employees, the public, and/or JCDHE. h) As appropriate, conduct and document post-treatment quality control inspections within 24 to 48 hours to assure the larvae population has been controlled. If larvae are found, a second application of control material shall be applied. These activities shall be included in the weekly activity reports. , i) Develop a method to contact private property land owners and obtain permission to enter property to conduct IMM activities. Entry onto private property shall be by prior authorization of the owner/agent. j) Maintain real-time documentation of all PLD site surveillance and larval control activity and enter real-time data into a JCDHE approved electronic database. An electronic copy of the database shall be provided to JCDHE on or before November 1. 2007 and/or upon the request of JCDHE. c. Public Education 1. The service provider shall maintain a public education website providing general information on WNV and WEE, including basic disease information, tips for personal protection, information for homeowners on standing water, aerial spraying information (if appropriate), phone numbers to call, links to other websites, etc. 2. The service provider shall coordinate with JCDHE to provide printed public education information relating to WNV and/or WEE for the topics referenced in paragraph 1, above. 3. in the eVeilt :r.at auJlticiding or aerial sp:3yi,;g is 10 be perfoi.nsd, t:IO sE:rvh.:e provider shall notify all residents in the area to be sprayed who are registered 2007 IMM sow FINAL SAdoc Page 5 of 8 ( EXHIBIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK in the State of Colorado Pesticide Sensitive Registry. A minimum of 3 attempts shall be made to reach these persons prior to the spraying or application. The Ultra Low Volume (ULV) insecticide application will be shut off in front of and upwind from sensitive resident's properties. The service provider shall maintain MSD sheets for all products used and shall provide such information upon request to employees, the public, and/or JCDHE. If adulticide spraying is required the service provider shall collaborate with JCDHE to coordinate the delivery of these services. D. Record Keeoina The, service provider shall maintain all records and documents pertaining to the services provided under this contract for a period of 3-years. By December 1, 2007 and/or upon the request of JCDHE, the service provider shall provide JCpHE with copies. of any and all records and documents pertaining to the services provided under this contract in an electronic and/or hard copy format approved by JCDHE. E. Reeortinp " 1. Weekly,Report: The service provider shall provide a weekly summary report of IMMservice activities. Weekly reports shall include but not limited to: , a) The total number of PLD site inspections and post-treatment quality control inspections performed and the number these inspections for each municipality and for the unincorporated area of the County. b) The number of larvicide applications, including products used and methods of dispersal. c) The number of mosquitoes caught in light and gravid trapping, including the number of the various Culex or other arboviral vector species. d) The number of inspectors used and the amount of time spent conducting contract work, reported as larval inspection time, mosquito trapping time, and office or support time. e) The number of complaints received, areas inspected because of those complaints, the findings of each inspection and actions taken. 2. Annual Report: By December 1, 2007 the service provider shall provide an annual report to JCDHE regarding all IMM service activities performed under this contract. The annual report shall be provided in a format acceptable to JCDI-:E both electronically and in hard copy (5 copies) and shall include but not limited to: a) surveillance activities and findings, 2007 IMMSOW FINAL SA.doc Page 6 of8 ( ( EXHIBIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK b) total hours logged for each service activity by the service provider and its employees, c) total number of PLD sites inspected, total number of sites treated, total number of mosquito trap nights, etc. d) an end of season map that illustrates the PLD sites identified and inspected during the contract season, e) the GIS shape files or other electronic files used to create the PLDsite map. f) a complete list of all PLD sites and their classification. The PLD list shall include the service provider's recommendations for additions, deletions, and/or revisions to the list of PLD sites. F. Adult Mos,guit6 ControlProtiram Develobment and' Coordination: 'In the event of a Public Health Emergency, the service provider shall assist JCDHE in the development of timely adult mosquito control programs, such as ground and/or aerial adulticide spraying. Adult mosquito control programs shall be conducted accordance with all state and federal requirements. The cost of this service and adult mosquito control programs are not included in this contract. , G. Deoartment, Emolovee Trainino: Upon request the service provider shall provide up to four (4) hours of training for Department employees. H. Board of Health AOQ.earances: Upon request the service provider shall appear before the Jefferson County Board of Health to provide updates and/or a year- end report on contract activities. Up to six Board of Health appearances may be requested by JCDHE. III. TERM OF SERVICE AGREEMENT The Service Agreement shall be in effect for the period beginning April 17 , 2007 through December 31, 2007. All field service activities shall commence no later than June 1, 2007 and shall continue until JCDHE determines that a specific field service is no longer needed, but no later than September 30, 2007. IV. WORK PRODUCTS Any and all maps, reports, spreadsheets, databases, geographical information system (GIS) files, newsletters and other hard copy or electronic documents generated by the service provider in fulfillment of its obligations under this contract shall be the property of JCDHE, who shall have sole and complete discretion regarding their use and di:;l~jbutic,i. I..a work pioduct.. shall Le delivared tv JemiE in a mutua Ii}> agreed upun hardcopy and/or electronic format suitable for including in reports and folders. The data 2007 IMM SOW FINAL SAdoc Page 7 of8 ( ( EXHmIT A JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT 2007 INTEGRATED MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT SERVICES Service Agreement: SCOPE OF WORK and weekly reports will be furnished in standard 8 % by 11 inch paper. All reports will include the activity undertaken in each of the cities in the County. Delivery of the principal work products shall be provided according to the following delivery schedule. : Work Product Delivery Schedule I Work Product Begin Larval Mosquito Surveillance and Control Begin Adult Mosquito Surveillance First Weekly Report CoinpletelnitiallilSpection of f.>LD Sites ' Provide updated list of PLD sites and their classification End Adult Mosquito Surveillance End Larval Mosquito Surveillance and Ccmtrol Last Weekly Report Electronic database of larval' surveillance and control activities I Copy of records and documents pertaining to 2007 IMM' services under this contract I FirSt draft Annual RePQrt I Final draft Annual Report Delivery Date June 1, 2007 June4, 2007 June 8, 2007 "Ju.ne,21 , 2007 June 30, 2007 August 31, 2007 September 30, 2007 October 5, 2007 November 1,2007 '\0(" , December 1, 2007 , December 1, 2007 December 31, 2007 ACRONYMS Acronym DefinitiOn CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CDPHE Colorado Department of Puplic Health and Environment and its employees GIS Geographical Information Systems IMM Integrated Mosquito Management JCDHE Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment and its employees MSD Material Safety Data PLD Potential Larval Development WEE Westem Equine Encephalitis WNV West Nile Virus Attachment A: Jefferson County IMM Program Service Area Map Attachment 8: CDPHE 2005 Mosquito Surveillance Plan Attachment C: CDPHE West Nile Virus Mosquito Testing 2007 Sentinel Zone Protocol 2007 IMM SOW FINAL SA.doc Page 8 of8 2006 Integrated Mosquito Management Service Area Map ,; \" .' , L 'L :,\. , I: ; " " \'0 - _ ,( 1')..;';'" i.::, ,..;f." 0.: ~' € fittUre:#t ;,,~n:r:':==r'OGnm.l . D!1te'l'flil1 I '1frivironmentall ~ Attachment A Attacbment B Attachment B 2005 Mosquito Surveillance Plan 3/23/05 A. Introduction: Mosquito trapping and testing data provide both qualitative and quantitative information on arbovirus activity and potential human risk in an area. Advances in testing mosquito pools and calculation of minimum infection rates allow an integrated system based on mosquito surveillance to comprise a large part of the arbovirus surveillance strategy. Testing will focus on Culex species of mosquitoes, as these are the primary human vectors. B. Plan Description: Mosquito testing this season will remain essentially unchanged from 2004. It will again have a three-tiered approach utilizing, once again, sentinel, floater, and permanent mosquito trap sites. Sentinel sites (see attached Mosquito Sentinel Site Guidelines) will act as a longitudinal system to replace chicken flocks, provide population data based on a consistent trapping protocol, and allow testing for the three arboviruses present in Colorado (Western equine, St Louis, and West Nile). Permanent traps are the ,loDl!:-term mosquito trap sites that local surveillance I control operations maintain at their own discretion, above and beYOlid the sentinel sites agreed to by CJ)PHE. Floater traps are those that are deployed based on current surveillance data such as positive birds and horses or human cases to provide local risk assessment, and to support local control and prevention decisions. Sentinel Trans Unlike sllntinel chicken flocks, whose sole purpose as a surveillance tool was to detect the presence of mosquito borne viruses, mosquito sentinel sites will also provide temporal mosquito population data, species make-up, and infection rate data. In addition, the long- term baseline data that will be collected, using a standardized trapping and testing protocol, can be used to accurately compare year-to-year changes in mosquito populations. It is hoped that this approach can be sustained and provide a long-term surveillance system for arbovirus activity into the future. Mosquitoes will be collected at the sentinel sites weekly and all pools of Culex species will be tested forWNV using RT-PCR. A sample of submitted pools will also be tested for Western Equine Encephalitis (WEE) and St. Louis Encephalitis (SLE) viruses. This will permit accurate mosquito infection rates to be calculated. The number of sentinel mosquito trap sites will increase slightly (21 sites) from last season (15 sites) to upgrade the level of eoverHge acro~s the state, As was the case last season. the selection of sentinel sites wi1\ J:tandal'OSMosqlMo"lCo!lecIProlocolsl'OSMo"lSurveilPIn _ RevB _ 3-23-0S,doc 1 Attachment B be determined by geographic location and the willingness of the local health agency, MAD, etc. to assume the responsibilities of maintaining a site during this and subsequent years. Floater Mosouito Trans "Floater" mosquito trap testing will integrate the qualitative virus data collected from dead birds, horse and human cases ,with the quantitative data mosquito trapping can provide. Local agencies will decide the need for trapping in their area, which should be driven by positive virus fmdings using other surveillance tools (positive dead birds or horses). These trap site locations are expected to change from year to year based on local surveillance needs. Permanent MOSQuito Trans The third category of mosquito trapping includes permanimt mosquito trapsltesthat iocal organizations and agencies operate and maintain, usually to mouitor nuisance mosquito populations. The testing of Culex pools collected from these traps depends largely upon the conditions that exist at that site. Sampling and testing criteria will be discussed below (see C. 3. c. Mosquito testing criteria). Surveillance Dates to Remember Dead bird and mosquito surveillance activities will commence May l't. luitial testing will focus on dead birds as they will be a more sensitive indicator of virus activity early in the season when mosquito populations and infection rates are low. Once virus is detected in an area, mosquito testing should be used to assess the level of risk for human transmission. Dead bird testing should be limited to no more than two or three WNV+ birds from the same area (i.e., approx. 5 mf area or 1.25 mi. radius). Further bird testing does not provide additional information and expends limited lab resources. Unlike last season l1owever, corvid bird specimens meeting sampling ~.:t~.:a will be accepted beyond the July 1st deadline date for bird testing if no other WNV + birds or other surveillance tool iudicates virus activity in that area. All Culex spp. mosquito pools from sentinel trap sites will be tested using RT -PCR at the CDPHEILSD lab in Denver. However, mosquito pools from sentinel traps in Moffat, Mesa, and Delta counties will be sent to and tested at the regional labv.,,;v.; in Grand Junction. Prior to July,I!S, Culex mosquito pools fromfloater and permanent traps should be tested at the CDPHE Laboratory Services Division (LSD) using RT -PCR because of its greater sensitivity.. ..' .; , ' ' '?one Trauniu!!: During this early trapping period (May l't to July 1'\ in an effort to stretch diagnostic resources, surveillance participants are strongly encouraged to "zone" trap their floater and permanent trap captures. That is, co-mingle, by species, Culex mosquito captures from several floater or permanent traps in a general geographic area to increase the size of pools being tested. Because early season Culex numbers are not expected to be very high until later in the season, pooling captures from several traps will reduce the number of small mosquito pools that use the same test as would a pool of 50 J:tanda/'05MosqlMo"'lCollectProtocolsl'05MosqSurveilPIn _ RevB _3-23-05,doc 2 Attachment B mosquitoes. If a positive, co-mingled pool is detected, subsequent collections specific to a trap may be submitted in order to determine which trap the positive pool came from. After Julv I!!, when expanding Culex mosquito populations and increasing infection rates should offset the lower sensitivity ofVecTest@, mosquitoes from these floater and permanent traps will be tested by VecTest@ at the six regional laboratories. If WEE or SLE activity is observed, regional labs will be provided with multi-antigen VecTest@ kits valid for all three viruses. Participants in the surveillance program are encouraged to use limited mosquito testing resources responsibly. At this time there will be no testing quota assigned to each county. Depending on the intensity of virus activity that is detected, the risk of human exposure, planned control..fIv,;", etc., diagnostic resources may be diverted to where they are needed most. Regional epidemiologists 'and CDPHE will be monitoring diagnostic resource usage, suggesting where testing is needed and curtailing usage when it's at't'.~t'.;ate based on virus activity and the resources that are available for that region or county. C. Plan Criteria: 1. Sentinel Mosquito Trap Sites: a. Obligations: '1) Trapping Schedule: weekly from early May through September. In 2005, 'it is recommended that a trapping frequency of one uight per week be observed, adding additional uights if needed due to inclement weather. 2) Each site will consist of2CDC CO' baited, light traps and one gravid trap. 3) Traps shall be properly maintained and baited "t'l'>Vl',;ately (i.e., dry ice for light traps and straw-manure infusion for gravid traps). See "Mosquito Trapping and Handling Protocol" dated 4/29/04. 4) Accurate records ,m\lintl\ined (date, # trap nights, # mosquitoes by species" Culex population density, weather conditions, etc.) 5) W eeklv submission of Culex mosquito pools and data to LSD in Denver or if the pools are from Mesa, Delta, and Moffat counties, pools should be sent to the regional lab in Grand Junction. 6) Calculation of Infection Rates b; Site considerations: 1) Care should be used in selecting a sentinel trap site so they do not have to be moved to insure continuity of data. Site should be stable and easily accessible. 2) 'Site has a history of significant Culex mosquito activity and close proximity to 81'1',vl',;ate Culex breeding habitat 3) Close proximity to human populations 4}.. Availability ofrestiyg sites,and,pwtection frof\l w:nd (e,g. culverls. fences. shrubbery, trees, sheds, etc.) 5) Away from competing sources of light (light traps) or oviposition sites (gravid traps). 6) Avoid areas where heavy, regular adult mosquito and/or insect control areperformed. 7) History of past arbovirus activity. Note: "Sentinef' trap sites should remain at the same site each season; however, tr.lpS can h m:)\'ed withi" a gerernl are~ (< 0." mile. 0f,imilar habitat ir. (:~dcr J:tandal'05Mosq/Mo"'lCollectProtocolsl'OSMo"'lSurveilPIn_RevB _3-23-0S,doc 3 Attachment B to improve trap p",fuuuance and are not required to hang from the same tree week after week. c. Mosquito pooling suggestions: 1) Sorted Culex mosquitoes of the same species from the two light traps can be co- mingled into common pools. 2) Sorted mosquitoes from the gravid traps cannot be co-mingled with the same species from light traps. They must remain segregated in separate pools. Note: to calculate mosquito population density, take the total number of captured mosquitoes, by species, and divide by the number of trap nights. 2. Floater Mosquito Traps a. Location l',,.r",,,uces: same as above, except that a confirmed, infected dead bird, horse~ and/or human case has been reported in the area." " b. Deployment considerations: 1) Surveillance data will be used to support mosquito control activitivies . 2) Trap(s) deployed for a minimum of two (2) weeks. 3) Trap(s) operated a minimum of one night per week, adjusted to allow for inclement weather. 4) Traps properly maintained and baited al'l'wl',;ately. 5) Mosquito captures sorted and pooled. Culex species submitted to the al'l'wl',;ate regional lab or LSD lab for testing. c. Obligations: 1) Trap data (e.g., trap nights, species, #'s, dates, Culex population density, weather conditions, etc.) maintained. 2) Calculation of Infection Rates 3) "Zone Trapping" see above. 3. Permanent Mosquito Traps a. Location preferences: same as those described for sentinel andjloater traps. b. Deployment considerations: the selected location has a history of trapping at that site. c. Mosquito testing criteria: 1) Many permanent traps have an established history and have collected an abundance of mosquito data over the years, but often have been deployed as a result of nuisance mosquito monitoring as opposed to arbovirus activity in which case, nuisance mosquito species will not be tested at this time 2) Culex mosquitoes from permanent traps should be tested if the site is within 1.25 mi. of a WNV+ bird, horse or human case, a sustained increase in the Culex mosquito population is noted, and/or the site provides the only arbovims surveillance data for that area. ' c. Obligations: 1) Trap data (e.g., trap nights, spp. #'s, dates, Culex population density, weather conditions, etc.) maintained. 2) Calculation of Infection Rates 3) "Zone Trapping" see above. J:tandal'05Mosq/Mo"'lCollectProtocol&"05Mo"'lSurveilPIn _Rev 8 _3-23-05.doc 4 Attachment C o<ado Department .fPublicHealth ndEnvironment West Nile Virus Mosquito Testing 2007 SENTINEL ZONE PROTOCOL Sentinel Zone Concent The goal of surveillance for mosquito-borne viruses (WNV, SLE, WEE) is to determine the human transmission risk in order to implement control and prevention strategies. To facilitate a standardized method of data collection and insure continued operation during anticipated budget reductions, the mosquito sentinel site concept was launched in 2004. Although these sites have, in general, accurately assessed West Nile Virus (WNV) activity in the region some problems have been identified. Specifically there was concern that a single site provided a poor representation of the region's mosquito populations and, more importantly, a single site was vulnerable to environmental changes that could reduce its effectiveness. To address the problems associated with a single trap location, the sentinel site concept is being modified into a "Sentinel Zone" approach. Within a defmed "sentinel zone" mosquito traps are set in strategic locations to ensure successful trapping of adequate numbers of mosquitoes throughout the WNV season. If one trap. or site become,s inoperable, mosquitoes fr9m other traps in the zone can stili be tested and the poor trap site can be relocated to another location within the zone. , " Following standardized trapping and testing protocols, a sentinel zone would provide data about mosquito population density, species make-up and arboviral activity that is comparable over the years. Furthermore, 'this approach will provide sufficient mosquito testing volume for calculating accurate infections rates to allow control decisions to be made (i.e. to spray or not to spray) in time to have a public health benefit. All Culex species mosquitoes collected in the sentinel zones will be tested for WNV by RT-PCR and Ii sample of the submitted pools will also be tested for Western equine encephalitis (WEE) and St. Louis encephalitis (SLE), Scone of Work I) Definin!! a zone: Local agencies can determine where a zone will be located and what geographic area it will encompass within the following parameters: ~ A wne will be a circle with a minimum radius of 1.5 miles and a maximum radius of 5 miles ~ The center point of the circle will be used as the geo reference pnint for the wne (latitude/longitude). 2) Trao olacement: Each zone will consist of five CO2 baited light traps. Local agencies can determine where within the zone these traps are located. ~ Gravid traps or additional light traps can be maintained in the zone, however mosquitoes from other traps cannot be combined with the five zone traps for either testing or calculation of infection rates. ~ The same location for each trap must be used throughout a season. However, when neces~arv a non-producing trap can be moved to another location within the zone although this should be minimized and occur early in the season. Coi~ Dq,.rm.enl nfPublic Health andEmironment Attachment C 3) Traooinl! schedule: To better reflect the WNV transmission season in Colorado AND ensure the majority of samples (:::60%) are tested during the peak of the transmission season the following schedule will be used. This schedule will result in a total of 100 trap/nights per zone for the season. Agencies can decide which night of the week to use although the same day should be used each week when possible ~ Weeks of June 4th through June ISth, 2007 - trap one night per week ~ Weeks of June 25th through August 6th, 2007 - trap two nights per week ~ Weeks of August 13th through August 27th, 2007 - trap one night per week 4) Mosouito Submission: The 5 traps within the sentinel zone could be viewed as one large mosquito trap from which the pooled infection rate and vector index will be calculated to assess human risk. ~ All female Culex mosquitoes trapped in a sentinel zone must be submitted to the state lab. ~ Submit mosquitoes in separate pools by Cx. taralis and other Culex (i.e. Cx. pipiens, Cx erythrothorax, Cx resturans combined). ~ Pool size can be up to 65 mosquitoes per vial. ~ CRITICAL -- the exact number of mosquitoes per vial must be recorded as this affects the infection rate calculations. ~ Culex mosquitoes captured in the 5 zone traps and the captures from the 2 nights per week during the peak of the trapping period should be co-mingled into the minimum number of pools. This will extend limited testing resources. 5) Data Maintenance: Accurate records of trapping results must be maintained to allow year- to-year comparisons and monitor trends in mosquito populations. Dramatic changes in Culex numbers or proportions can provide an early indication of increasing human risk. ~ It is stronl!lv recommended that all mosquitoes in the traps be identified to species and that population data be maintained for all species. ~ At a minimum, data to maintain should include: trapping dates, # mosquitoes in the zone traps, Culex population density by species (Cx tarsalis and other Culex at a minimum), and weather conditions on night of mosquito trapping. ~ At the end of the season, a file with the sentinel zone data for the entire season (preferably in electronic format) must be sent to CDPHE. 6) Other Considerations: ~ Sentinel zones should contain areas that are suitable for Culex mosquitoes to breed and are in close proximity to human populations. ~ Sentinel zone traps should not be located in an area with regular, heavy spraying operations for adult mosquito or other arthropod control (orchards or agriculture areas). Areas with ongoing larviciding are OK. ~ Traps within a zone should have an availability of mosquito resting sites and protection from wind (i.e. culverts, fences, shrubbery, trees, sheds, etc) and should be placed away from competing sources of light and carbon dioxide (e.g., a stockyard). ~ Traps should be placed on the leeward side of obstacles if possible. For example, if the pre\ailing wind is generally from the weSt just after dusk, try to place tile trap on the east side oftrees, sheds, etc. Exhibit B JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT STATEMENT OF COh..:<iliENTIALITY Clients of JCDHE have the right to protection of their personal and confidential information. This protection is required of all staff, business associates, independent contractors, students, volunteers, and any other individuals that access paper and electronic records. State statutes and Federal regulations require this protection by the department and individuals. Appropriate and proper uses and disclosures of protected health information are described in the department's Policy S and the Notice ofPrivacv Practices. Every individual in the department that has access to protected health information is responsible for the proper use and disclosure of this information. (See the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, 42 D.S.C., regulations at 4S C.F. R. Parts 160 and 164.) Specific state statutes and Federal laws govern the use and disclosure of information about clients enrolled in our alcohol and substance abuse programs. (See 42 D.S.C. 290dd-3 & 42 D.S.C. 290ee-3 and 42 CFR Part 2 for law and regulations.) Violation of these laws and regulations is a crime and will be reported. I understand that violation of the department's privacy practices and policies is punishable by the county disciplinary policy and various state and Federal laws. I will not use or disclose any protected health information in violation of these policies, laws and regulations. I have received a copy of the department's Privacy Policy and the Notice of Privacy Practices. bJ~~ Staff / Busines& Associate / Independe ontractor / Student / V oluuteer Signature Ec/F Print Name L/- -30-07 Date e-r~; t GJ/ht-onJ'YJlyrkJ}::t11 c. lCDHE 04/03, 10/03 'I'm/HIP AAlExhibils A - C/Ex, C - Statement of Confidentiality, doc DATE (MPNDD/YYYY) 03/29/2007 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF ",FORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, ~ n:,.,,, OR AL TEA THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. I INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE - NAlC # "NSURERk Hartford Casualty Insurance Co :9424 IINSURERS: Pinnacol Assurance Co I INSURER C: , INSURER 0: I INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWIT ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUI MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITION! POLICIES, AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, m'm~ TYPE OF INSURANCE POUCYNUMBER ~f~E GENERALUABlUTY 34SBAPC7671 06/23/2006 X COMMERClALGENERALUABIUTY = ::J CLAlMSMAOE m OCCUR ACORD CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE PROD~ (303)740-9404 Gaspar-Jones & Assoc., Inc. 7100 E. Belleview #101 P.O. Box 4516 Greenwood Village, CO 80155 INSURED UITERTAIL ENVIRONMENTAL 1045 N FORO ST GOLDEN, CO 80403 FAX (303)779-8376 A "R~~~NI UMITS 06/23/2007 EACH OCCURRENCE . ~DAMAGETORENTED $ "O"''''IO'C:IO'~~\ MEDEXP(ArrJ one person) $ I PERSONAL & M:N INJURY $ I GENERAL AGGREGATE $ I PROOUCTS-COMPIOPAGG 1$ I I 06/23/20071 COMBINEO SINGLE UMIT I (Ea_1 · I. I. I. A GEN'LAGGREGATE UMrr APPLIES PER: Xl POUCY n ':2i n Loe AUTOMOBILE UABfUTY I ANY AUTO AL1.O\MIlEDAUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS X HIRED AUTOS X NON-OWNEO AUTOS BODILY INJURY (1'0<,-1 34SBAPC7671 06/23/2006 BODILY INJURY (perpelSOl1) PROPERTY ~MAGE (Per"accldenI) GARAGEUABlUTY ~ Atf( AUTO EXCESSJUMBREUA UABIUTY :=J OCCUR 0 ClAIMS MADE IAUTOONLY.EAACClDENT 1$ I Ol}1ERTHAN EAACC I $ AUTOONL Y: AGG I $ I EACH OCCURRENCE I $ I AOOREGAlE I . I I. I I. I I. 07 /01/2007 L)(JiIIiJ,\'T~'\\!,; I IOJl'.1 rE:L:EACH ACCIDENT I $ I ELIlSEASE.EAEMPLOYEE 1$ I ELDlSEASE-POUCYUMIT 1$ I DEDUCTIBLE -, RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSA110N AND EMPLOYERS' UABlUTY B ~,~WJir&'ift:cl~~cunVE ~~~OVlU:-ONSbeIoN OTHER 4072127 07/01/2006 DESCRIPTION OF OP~110NSII-0CA110NS'-VEHiCLES IEXCLUSIONSADDED BY ENDORSEMENTI SPECIAL P~ONS [he cities ot Arvada, Golden, Littleton, Lakewood and Wheat Ridge are held harmless insured contract. · 10 day notice on non-payment as per the CF;RTlFlCATJ: !-Inr nl=~ I I I 2.000"00~ 300.0001 10.00~' 2"000"00~ 4.000.000 4.000.00~ 2.000.00~ 1.!l00.00~ 1.000.00~ 1.000"00~ CANCF-II Al1n~ SHOULDANYOFTHEABOVE DESCRIBeD POUClES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRA110N DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURERWlLL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30* DAYS WRITTEN NOnCE TO THECER11RCATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH N011CE SHAll IMPOSE NO OBUGATION OR UABl.UTY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS ORREPRESENTATlVES. I AUTHORlZEDREPRESENTA11VE Maureen Noreiko Jefferson County Dept of Health & Environment Attn: Jenni Springer 1801 19th Street Golden, CO 80401 ACORD 25 (2001/08) FAX: (303)271-5702 @ACORD CORPORATION 1988 IMPORTANT If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy{ies) must be endorsed, A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement{s). If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the tenns and conditions ofthe policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement{s), DISCLAIMER The Certificate of Insurance on the reverse side of this form does not constitute a contract between the issuing insurer{s), authorized representative or producer, and the certificate holder, nor does it affirmatively or negatively amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed thereon. ACORD 25 (2001108) RESOLUTION NO. 16 SERIES OF 2007 TITLE: A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (IGA) BETWEEN THE JEFFERSON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT AND THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE FOR COOPERATIVE MOSQUITO MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,602.50 WHEREAS, the intergovernmental agreements between political subdivisions of the State of Colorado are authorized by C.R.S. ~ 29-1-205; and WHEREAS, Jefferson County will permit and encourage governments to make the most efficient and effective use of their powers and responsibilities by cooperating and contracting with other governments; and WHEREAS, in order to effectively deal with the continuing threat of mosquito borne transmission of West Nile Virus, the Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment has contracted with OtterTail Environmental for integrated mosquito management (IMM) service within Jefferson County, Colorado, during the year 2006; and WHEREAS, the agreement with the Jefferson County Department of Health and Environment will help slow the spread and impact of the West Nile Virus; and WHEREAS, initial cost for prevention services will not exceed $6,602.50 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE THAT: 1. The City of Wheat Ridge desires to be a party to the Intergovernmental Agreement coordinating mosquito control activities. 2. The Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and empowered to execute the Intergovernmental Agreement on behalf of the City of Wheat Ridge. DONE AND RESOLVED at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado on the day of .2007. Jerry DiTullio, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk A I I ACHMENT 2 ITEM NO: -, ,.13 I REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION /" ,...." ~~~:~j::t~ ~,C~~'@:~ "> '~$'~ I'.."_N"": i-';."'"-{ "J"" ".."" "_~."" ,..., IJ[[fj COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11,2007 TITLE: RESOLUTION 18-2007 - A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,716 FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE MODEL PROCESS FOR NillSANCE ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS o PUBLIC HEARING o BIDS/MOTIONS ~ RESOLUTIONS o ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING (Date: o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ) Quasi-Judicial: o Yes ~ No ~Nu.*= <:RJc::uf'q Jimbfi0ACiing ChiVfPolice Randyyo~, CityM~ger EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Administrative Model Process for Nuisance Ordinance Violations moves the process from its current criminal, due process model, to an administrative model. The proposed administrative model makes the process more efficient by establishing appropriate and specific timelines for a property owner to come into compliance. It establishes specific penalties for first, second and third offenses and allows for a timely hearing process before an Administrative Hearing Officer. It includes a property abatement process, if necessary, and finally, this process allows for a criminal nuisance enforcement process, if required, The process of changing to an administrative model will enable the City to be more responsive to community concerns regarding code enforcement issues. This process should minimize the time and effort spent by City employees in achieving compliance from property owners, and provide for a more timely resolution of violations. The Administrative Model Process was discussed by City Council during the February 5, 2007 Study Session. A copy of the memorandum presented at the February Study Session which outlines the process and implementation costs is included as Attachment #1. City Council adopted the Ordinance implementing the Administrative Model Process at the May 14, 2007 City Council meeting. The process is scheduled to go into effect June 15, 2007. Supplemental budget funding is requested for the implementation of this process. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: N/A STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: In order to initiate the Administrative Model Process, it is necessary to consider this supplemental budget resolution to defray the additional costs of the program. These costs represent additional hours of personnel labor to existing positions in the Finance Division and in the Municipal Court, but do not require the additional hiring of any employees. There is also a one-time software purchase with subsequent software maintenance in future years. Revenue estimates from the collection of fines are also presented in the Financial Impact section. ~TERNATIVES CONSIDERED: I. Do not approve the additional funding for the Administrative Model Process. This alternative is not recommended for reasons outlined in the statement of issues. 2. Approve the additional funding for the Administrative Model Process. City staff recommends this alternative as the preferred alternative. 3. Seek other methods of funding the process. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The financial impact to the City will be in added costs to the Municipal Court and Finance Division. No additional personnel will be required for the operation of the Administrative Model Process, however; additional labor hours will be added to existing positions. There is also a one- time software purchase. For this supplemental budget request, staff is requesting additional funding for the remainder ofthe year 2007 only. That cost is estimated to be $22,716. · Finance/Administrative Services )>> Personnel )>> Software . Municipal Courts )>> Personnel )>> Materials )>> AHO (Estimate $65 per hr. x 255 hrs.) $ 8,500 $ 2,900 $ 2,940 $ 88 $ 8,288 . TOTAL COSTS JUNE-DECEMBER 2007 $22,716 Cities that have moved to the proposed administrative hearing model report a 70% compliance rate by property owners advised of code violations. Based on past cases, the estimated revenue is projected as follows: . Estimated Revenue - )>> 2006 -1,080 Code Enforcement Cases )>> 4,019 re-contacts )>> 70% Compliance Rate ~ Anticipate 324 citations issued ~ 324 (citations) X $150 (fIrst offense fIne) = $48,600 (full year estimate) ~ Estimated Revenue JUNE-DECEMBER 2007 = $24,300 City StaffwilI review the actual costs and revenue on a month-to-month basis to determine more precise figures for the Administrative Model Process in 2008 and subsequent years. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to adopt Resolution 18-2007 - A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2007 General Fund Budget to Reflect the Approval of a Supplemental Budget Appropriation in the Amount of$22,716 for the implementation of the Administrative Model Process for nuisance ordinance violations." or, "1 move to table indefInitely Resolution 18-2007 - A Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 2007 General Fund Budget to Reflect the Approval of a Supplemental Budget Appropriation in the Amount of $22,716 for the implementation of the Administrative Model Process for nuisance ordinance violations forthefollowingreason(s) " Report Prepared by: Reviewed by: Commander Jim Lorentz Chief Dan Brennan Patrick Goff, Deputy City Manager Attachments: I. Staff Report to City Council, dated January 31, 2007 2. Revised Chapter 14 ordinances 3. Resolution 18-2007 WHEATRIDGE POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: VIA: Mayor Jerry DiTullio and City Council Daniel Brennan, Chief of Police Randy Young, City Manager FROM: Wade Hammond, Commander Support Services Bureau Rollie Inskeep, Supervisor Community Services Unit DATE: January 31, 2007 SUBJECT: Administrative Enforcement Process for Code Ordinance Violations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Historically, the enforcement of code ordinances in the City of Wheat Ridge has been an arduous process, oftentimes with conflicting direction being given to the staff tasked with this function in the past. In 2000, City Council moved the code enforcement function from Community Development to the Police Department's Animal and Parks Enforcement Unit without any additional personnel being assigned to this unit. City Council's recent direction and policy pertaining to the enforcement of code ordinances has been consistent and clear. It has been apparent to members of the department that our current method of enforcing City code violations has not accomplished the results desired for a variety of reasons. Last year staff began exploring different alternatives to developing a more efficient and effective code enforcement process. With City Councils approval an alternative method of handling code ordinance violations has been researched. The Administrative Enforcement Process for code ordinance violations moves the process from a criminal, due process model to an administrative model. The proposed administrative model makes the process more efficient; establishes appropriate and specific timelines for a property owner to come into compliance; establishes specific penalties for first, second and third offenses; allows for a timely hearing process before an Administrative Hearing Officer if desired; and ATTACHMENT 1 includes a property abatement process if necessary. Lastly, this process does allow for a criminal code enforcement process if necessary. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The main issues facing City employees responsible for the enforcement of code ordinances are: time and manpower losses in an attempt to obtain voluntary compliance from property owners; workload demands from animal control and parks functions; the extended time it takes for a code violation to move through the court system; repeat offenders; absentee landlords; and the lengthy time it takes to recover abatement costs from property liens. The process of changing to an administrative enforcement model will enable the City to be more responsive to community concerns regarding code enforcement issues. This process should minimize the time and effort spent by City employees in achieving compliance from property owners. Staff has researched similar administrative hearing processes from Denver, Aurora, Ft. Collins and Craig, CO. Additionally, staff has worked with the City Attorney's Office, the City Municipal Courts, Information Technology Division and the Finance Division on developing an administrative enforcement model that will work for our community. Conceptually the proposed Administrative Hearing process will be structured as follows: ~ Violation is reported from citizen complainant or officer initiated; ~ A warning notice is issued by a Community Services Officer (CSO) to the property owner/renter giving them ten (10) days to bring the property into compliance; ~ CSO will photograph the violations; ~ After ten (10) days the CSO will recheck the property and if it is not in compliance issue an administrative summons to the violator which has a fine attached; ~ Violator has ten (10) days to come into compliance; ~ Primary CSO rechecks the property for compliance and if not corrected the property would be abated using the existing process; ~ The responsible party is sent a bill which includes the cost of the abatement, cost of time involved for the city employees, and the fine; ~ The responsible party has thirty (30) days to pay the bill or the property will have a property tax lien placed against it; ~ City staff recommends the following fine schedule: $150 for the first violation, $250 for the second violation, and $500 for the third violation. After three violations the owner could be charged criminally: ~ The violator may contest the charge and request a hearing within five (5) days after the issuance of the citation; and ~ An administrative hearing will be held before an administrative hearing officer no later than fourteen (14) days from the initial summons being issued. Prior to this system going into effect, a strong educational component is recommended. City staff recommends a thorough educational campaign that includes utilizing the media, the Wheat Ridge Connection, Channel 8 cable, and presenting the program at public meetings. Additionally, staff recommends a presi;lntation to WR2020. Other jurisdictions have seen a significant increase in compliance with this system and City staff feels that this educational component is vital to the success of this recommended program. FINANCIAL IMPACT; The current model used by the City for nuisance abatement taxes the available personnel resources we have. City staff believes that re-visits or compliance checks will be reduced with this new model. The department has met with representatives from the Municipal Courts, City Information Technology and the Finance Division to discuss workload and financial costs. Cities that have moved to this model report a 70% compliance rate by property owners advised of code violations. In 2006, the Community Services Unit handled approximately 2196 reported code ordinance violations. Seventy percent of 2196 is 1537, resulting in 659 anticipated administrative citations being issued based on 2006 data. Based on these estimates the Police Department anticipates adding to the workload of the Municipal courts and the Finance Division. Based on these projections the following costs are estimated: The Finance/Administrative Service Division oroiects: Personnel costs -- (Yo additional position for data entry and billing) Computer Software -- (Utility billing software) $17,000 $ 10,000 Courts Proiects: Personnel costs -- (362 additional staff hours) $ 6,814 Materials -- (File jackets and labels) $ 224 Hearing officer -- (330 hours/yr @ $65/hour) $21,450 Total Proaram Costs = $55.488 $98,850 Anticioated Revenue= 659 administrative summonses X $150 (first offense) Staff anticipates an impact to the budget for abating properties as well. In 2006, approximately $18,447 was spent for property abatement. In 2007, $25,000 has been budgeted for abatements. Staff recommends evaluating budget abatement dollars in 2007 and coming forward to City Council with any budget supplemental in 2007 if needed. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: 1. Maintain the current code enforcement model. 2. Continue to seek other methods of code ordinance enforcement including staffing increases in the Community Services. 3. Move to the administrative enforcement model of code ordinance enforcement. RECOMMENDATION: The Police Department recommends adopting the administrative enforcement model. This process is worthwhile and provides for a more effective and efficient process in handling nuisance related issues in our community. Staff requests that City Council approve moving forward with implementing an administrative enforcement process and consider adding additional personnel and operating resources as described under financial impacts. Staff is not requesting additional personnel for the Community Services Unit until a more thorough workload analysis can be conducted if this proposal is adopted. Based on City Council's recommendations and direction, our staff will work with the City Attorney and other City Departments to implement this process. If this recommendation is approved, City staff will begin work on evaluating the feasibility of moving other code ordinance violations enforced through Community Development and Public Works to this administrative model. Attachments: City Council Staff Report dated November 1, 2006 Memorandum from City Attorney dated December 7, 2006 Recommended Code of Law revisions Code Enforcement flowcharts Sample copy of code enforcement warning notice CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER STITES Council Bill No. 04 Ordinance No. 1 ~Il~ Series of 2007 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO INCLUDE A NEW ARTICLE V, CONCERNING THE ADMINISTRATIVE MODEL PROCESS OF CERTAIN CODE OF LAWS PROVISIONS, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 15 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO PROVIDE THAT A NOTICE OF VIOLATION ISSUED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 2, ARTICLE V, SHALL CONSTITUTE A NOTICE TO ABATE A NUISANCE WHEREAS, the City CounCil finds that the violaUon of certain provisions of the City's Code of Laws (the "Code") affects the livability of the City's neighborhoods and that residential, commercial and industrial neighborhoods in the City each experience problems with such violations; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to encourage compliance with ordinances that affect the quality of life in the City by requiring those who violate said ordinances to bear the cost of enforcement; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that increased enforcement of these ordinances would benefit the residents and businesses of the City;.and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there IS a need for an alternative method of enforcement for certain specified violations of the Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that an appropriate method of enforcement for such violations is an administrative citation program which imposes administrative penalties for certain violations of the Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that certain amendments should be made to the Code to accommodate the addition of the administrative citation program; and WHEREAS, the City Counc~ wishes to amend Chapter 2 of the Code to include a new Article V to (illow for the administrative enforcement of the Code and to amend Section 15-8 of the Code to provide that a notice of violation served pursuant to the administrative enforcement article shall constitute service of a notice to abate; 1 ATTACHMENT 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Chapter 2 of the Code, entitled "Administration," is hereby amended by adding a new Article V, Administrative Enforcement, as follows: ARTICLE V. ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT Sec. 2-80. Purpose; scope The purpose of this Article is to encourage prompt compliance with this Code and prompt payment of penalties for violations thereof. This Article provides for administrative penalties that may be imposed for violation of the following portions of this Code: Chapter 5, Buildings and Building Regulations; Chapter 13, Motor Vehicles and Traffic; Chapter 15, Nuisances; Chapter 26, Zoning. Sec. 2-81. Definitions. For the purposes of this Article the following terms shall have the meanings assigned to them below. A. "Administrative Hearing Officer" or "AHO" means the person with exclusive authority to hear appeals from, administrative citations issued under this Ordinance. B. "Applicable sections" means those sections in the Code of Laws contained within the Chapters listed in Section 2-80. C. "Code officer" shall mean the City Manager or the City Manager's designee, including but not limited to a community service officer, the building official, the property inspector or any other city official or employee charged with enforcing the provisions of this Article. D. "Manager" shall mean the City Manager or the City Manager's designee. E. "Municipal Court" means the Municipal Court for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. F. "Responsible party" shall mean a person or entity who has violated this Code or, in the case of property subject to an administrative citation under this Article, who has possession or control of any real property or premises, whether as owner, occupant or tenant, or in the case of a motor vehicle, as owner or operator of the same. Sec. 2-82. Authority. 2 (a) Any Responsible Party violating applicable sections may be issued an administrative citation by a code officer as provided in this Article. (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this Code, responsible parties cited under the provisions of this Article shall have only the appeal rights granted herein. (c) Administrative citations shall be issued only after the responsible party has received a notice of violation and has been given time to comply as stated in the notice of violation. (d) Each day a violation exists or continues shall constitute a separate and distinct violation for which a separate administrative citation may be issued. However, once an administrative citation has been issued for a violation of an applicable section, no additional administrative citation shall be issued for the same violation for ten days or, if the responsible party appeals, until after the appeal has been heard and the responsible party has not complied with an order of the Administrative Hearing Officer within ten (10) days of its issuance or such other time as the AHO has specified. (e) A fine assessed by means of an administrative citation issued by the code officer shall be payable directly to the Office of the City Treasurer, and if not timely paid, shall be collected in accordance with the procedures specified in this Article. (f) Enforcement actions for violations of applicable sections are intended to be alternative in nature. At anyone time, the City may pursue a civil, criminal, or administrative action against a responsible party. The City may also choose to pursue an alternative action upon staying the original action. Sec. 2-83. Notice of violation. (a) Upon becoming aware of a violation of an applicable section, a code officer may issue a notice of violation to the responsible party. The notice shall state the date and location of the violation, the approximate time the violation was observed, identifying, where applicable, the property in violation by address or legal description. The notice shall refer to the applicable section violated, describe the violation, and describe the action required to correct the violation. The notice shall require the responsible party to correct the violation within ten (10) days, and shall explain the consequences of failure to correct said violation, including the issuance of an administrative citation. (b) Service of a notice of a violation on the responsible party shall be by any of the following means: 3 1. If the responsible party resides at the site of the violation, the code officer may personally deliver a copy of the notice of violation to the responsible party at that site; or 2. A copy of the notice may be mailed by first class mail to the last known address of the responsible party as reflected in the county real estate records; or 3. A copy of the notice of violation may be posted in a conspicuous place on the unoccupied premises. Sec. 2-84. Administrative citation. (a) If the responsible party has failed to correct the violation noted in the notice of violation within the time provided on such notice, a code officer may issue an administrative citation to the responsible party on a form approved by the City Manager (b) The code officer may require that the responsible party provide evidence of identity and residential or working address. (c) The code officer shall attempt to issue the administrative citation to the responsible party at the site of any violation. The code officer may issue the administrative citation to the responsible party by the methods described in Section 2-83, subsection (b), above. (d) The code officer shall attempt to obtain the signature of the person receiving the administrative citation on the citation. If that person refuses or fails to sign the administrative citation, the failure or refusal to sign shall not affect the validity of the citation and subsequent proceedings. (e) Notice shall be deemed served on the earliest of: (i) the date of receipt by the responsible party, if personally served; (ii) the fourth day after the mailing of the administrative citation; or (iii) t~e date the administrative citation was posted. Sec. 2-85. Contents of administrative citation. (a) The administrative citation shall state the location of the violations and the date and approximate time the violations were observed. Where applicable, the administrative citation shall identify the property in violation by address or legal description. (b) The administrative citation shall refer to the applicable sections violated and describe the violations. (c) The administrative citation shall describe the action required to correct the violations. 4 (d) The administrative citation shall require the responsible party to correct the violations immediately and shall explain the consequences of failure to correct said violations. (e) The administrative citation shall state the amount of fine imposed for the violations. (f) The administrative citation shall explain how the fine shall be paid, the time period by which it shall be paid, and the consequences of failure to pay the fine. (g) The administrative citation shall briefly state the process for appealing the administrative citation. (h) The administrative citation shall contain the signature of the code officer and the signature of the responsible party if it can be obtained. Sec. 2-86. Appeal of administrative citation. (a) A person served with an administrative citation may file a notice of appeal within five (5) calendar days from the service of the administrative citation. Compliance with this time limit shall be a jurisdictional prerequisite to any appeal brought under this Article, and failure to comply shall bar any such appeal. (b) The notice of appeal shall be made in writing and shall be filed with the Municipal Court in person, by facsimile transmission or by mail. Regardless of the manner of filing such appeal, the notice of appeal must be filed with the Municipal Court within five (5) calendar days from the date the administrative citation was served. (c) As soon as practicable after receiving the written notice of appeal, the Municipal Court shall assign an AHO who shall schedule a date, time and location for the hearing. (d) Written notice of the date, time and location of the hearing shall be personally served upon or sent by first class mail to the responsible party at least five (5) calendar days prior to the date of the hearing. The hearing shall be held no more than fourteen (14) days after the date upon which the administrative citation was issued. (e) In computing the day a notice of appeal must be filed or the day by which a hearing must be held, the first day is excluded and the last day is included. If the last day of any period is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period is extended to the first day thereafter which is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. 5 Sec. 2-87. Administrative hearing officers. (a) The Administrative Hearing Officer must be an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado with a minimum of three years of experience. (b) Any person designated to serve as an AHO is subject to disqualification for bias, prejudice, interest, or for any other reason for which a judge may be disqualified in a court of law. ' Sec. 2-88. Administrative appeals. (a) Administrative appeals are intended to be informal in nature. Formal rules of evidence and discovery do not apply. The procedure and format of the administrative hearing shall follow the procedures provided in this Section. (b) The parties to an administrative appeal shall be the responsible party and the Wheat Ridge Police Department. Parties may be represented by legal counsel. Each parties may call and question witnesses, cross-examine witnesses and present evidence in support of its case. (c) The AHO, at the request of any party to the hearing, may subpoena witnesses, documents and other evidence where the attendance of the witness or the admission of evidence is deemed necessary to decide the issues at the hearing. All costs related to the subpoena, including witness and mileage fees, shall be borne by the party requesting the subpoena. The form of, and the process for issuing, subpoenas shall be the same as in the Municipal Court. (d) The AHO shall have the power to call and question witnesses, review and consider the relevancy of documentary or other tangible evidence, and rule on evidentiary questions. (e) The only issue to be decided by the AHO is whether the code officer exceeded his/her authority in issuing the administrative citation. The City bears the burden of proof to establish the existence of a violation of the Code. In the case of a nuisance abatement hearing, the City bears the burden of proof to establish the existence of a public nuisance. The City's meeting of this burden of proof shall constitute prima facie evidence that the code officer did not exceed his/her authority. The appellant shall have the burden of rebutting such evidence. (f) The standard of proof required in an administrative appeal is a preponderance of the evidence. 6 (g) Copies, photographs, and photocopies may be admitted into evidence or substituted in evidence in place of original documents. (h) Hearings shall be recorded by electronic means and transcripts of such recordings shall be made at the expense of the party requesting the transcript. (i) Whenever it appears that a petition is not filed within the time permitted by the particular law or ordinance involved, .or that the AHO for some other reason lacks jurisdiction, the case may be dismissed on the motion of any party or on the AHO's own motion. (j) The decisi.on of the AHO shall be kn.own as an administrative enforcement order. (k) The AHO may uphold the administrative citation and all penalties or dismiss the administrative citation and all penalties or may waive or conditi.onally reduce the penalties assessed by the administrative citation. The AHO may also impose conditions and deadlines to correct the violations or require payment of any outstanding penalties. (I) In the event that the AHO d.oes n.ot dismiss the administrative citation, the AHO shall assess reasonable administrative costs of n.ot less than .one hundred dollars ($100), but not to exceed two hundred dollars ($200). (m)The administrative enforcement order shall become final .on the date of mailing the order t.o the responsible party. A copy of the order shall be provided to the City. Sec. 2-89. Failure to .obey subpoena. It is unlawful for any person to refuse to obey a subpoena issued by an AHO. Failure to obey a subpoena constitutes contempt and may be criminally prosecuted and have penalties imposed in the same manner as violation of a Municipal Court subpoena. Sec. 2-90. Failure to attend administrative appeal. Any responsible party who fails to appear at the hearing is deemed to waive the right to a hearing and the adjudicati.on of the issues related to the hearing, provided that pr.oper notice of the hearing has been provided. Sec. 2-91. Failure to comply with administrative enforcement order It is unlawful for a resp.onsible party who has been served with a copy of the final administrative enforcement .order, to fail to c.omply with the order. Failure t.o comply with a final administrative enforcement order may be criminally 7 prosecuted and have penalties imposed similar to those for failure to comply with an order of the Municipal Court. Sec. 2-92. Penalties assessed. (a) The Manager shall develop guidelines for fines based upon the Manager's assessment of the cost to the City for enforcing the provisions of this Article. Such guidelines shall be approved by the City Council. Thereafter, the Manager shall publish a schedule of fines for administrative citations. The schedule of fines shall be graduated in amount, with the smallest fine being assessed for the first administrative citation and increasingly larger fines for second, third and subsequent administrative citations. No single fine assessed for an administrative citation shall exceed $1,000. The schedule of fines shall be amended no more than once per year. (b) If the responsible party fails to correct the violation, subsequent administrative citations may be issued for violations of the same applicable section. The fine assessed for each administrative citation issued for violations of the same applicable section(s) shall not exceed the amount set in the Manager's schedule of fines regardless of the number of violations per citation. (c) Payment of the fine shall not excuse the failure to correct the violations nor shall it bar further enforcement action by the City. (d) All fines assessed shall be payable to the City of Wheat Ridge. Sec. 2-93. Failure to pay fines (a) The failure of any responsible party to pay the fines assessed by an administrative citation within the time specified on the citation or administrative enforcement order, if an administrative hearing was held, may result in the imposition of a late fee of fifty dollars ($50.00), a twenty percent (20%) charge to defray the cost of collection, and interest at a rate of ten percent (10%) per annum on all unpaid amounts. ' (b) In the event of failure to pay all fines assessed, the Manager may refer the matter for collection by whatever means are available to the City. (c) In the case of delinquent charges, assessments or taxes, including fines and the costs of nuisance abatement, the Manager shall, pursuant to C.R.S. S 31-20-105, certify the same to the treasurer of the county to be collected and paid over by the treasurer of the county in the same manner as taxes are collected. 8 (d) An action or other process provided by law may be maintained by the City to recover or collect any amounts, including late fees, interests, and administrative costs, owing under this article. Section 2. Section 15-8. Abatement, subsection (a) is hereby amended as follows: a) Notice to abate. Any authorized city officer, upon the discovery of any nuisance on public or private property in the city, may, in the exercise of his discretion, notify the responsible party in writing, requiring the responsible party to remove and abate from the property the thing or things therein described as a nuisance. SERVICE OF A NOTICE OF VIOLATION BY A CODE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 2-83 OF THIS CODE SHALL BE CONSIDERED SERVICE OF A NOTICE TO ABATE AND THE CITY MAY BEGIN THE ABATEMENT PROCESS WITH THE APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT ORDER. For any nuisance which does not threaten eminent danger of damage or injury, and for which a discretionary notice to abate has been issued, the reasonable time for abatement shall not exceed seven (7) days unless it appears from the facts and circumstances that compliance could not reasonably be made within seven (7) days or that a good faith attempt at compliance is being made. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect On June 15, 2007, as permitted by the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 7 to 0 on this 23rd day of Avril , 2007 ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for Mav 14 , 2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED reading by a vote of R to 0 , this Mav , 2007. on second and final 14th day of 9 SIGNED b 2007 Y the Mayor on this ATTEST: fidJ~ ~clme1' S" , u.n.,' , ,,', City Clerk First Publicatio . Second P b' n. April 26 Wh u hcation' May 17 ,2007 eat Rid e . . 2007 Effective D~te:ranscriPt . June 15. 2007 15th d JdH~ ~t::PlTullio, Mayor .' 10 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO RESOLUTION 18 Series of 2007 A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $22,716 FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE MODEL PROCESS FOR NUISANCE ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the violation of certain provisions of the City's Code of Laws (the "Code") affects the livability of the City's neighborhoods and that residential, commercial and industrial neighborhoods in the City each experience problems with such violations; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to encourage compliance with ordinances that affect the quality of life in the City by requiring those who violate said ordinances to bear the cost of enforcement; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that increased enforcement of these ordinances would benefit the residents and businesses of the City; and WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Charter requires that amendments to the budget be effected by the City Council adopting a Resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ofthe City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows: A. The City Council authorizes the transfer of$22,716 from the General Fund undesignated reserves to the following account( s) and amending the 2007 fiscal year budget accordingly. · Finance Personnel (01-103-600-602) $ 8,500 · Information Technology Software (01 -117-700-755) $ 2,900 · Municipal Court Personnel (01-109-600-602) $ 2,940 · Materials (01-109-650-651) $ 88 · Administrative Hearing Officer (01-109-600-619) $ 8,288 TOTAL $22,716 DONE AND RESOLVED THIS day of 2007. Jerry DiTullio, Mayor ATTEST: Michael D. Snow, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 3 A~' we"" "/ ~ 0 - ~ u ~~",-...!' 1 f<1 CbLoR/l.Q9 ITEM NO: Le. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ~""i"{{\.!/" ,'''''''''' ' ~..'2:1 ..., '"_"';:;:',c'~_~/' &A'Q~,~~:'~"'~'<I~~~-', n....... ,.-"", . iiiL___-- ~linilf~"b. J'T"'\., 0~~3 ~qg&i11 0 l~< '.iP ~;':,j7Cii~~t ~~~, ~~~~I~- COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TITLE: APPROVAL OF ARCtll 1 ECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL o PUBLIC HEARING C8J BIDS/MOTIONS o RESOLUTIONS o ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date: o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ) Quasi-Judicial: o Yes o No ~1liiL City~a ~ Community Development Director ]:XECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Streets cape and Architectural Manual was adopted in 2001. The purpose of the current Manual is to regulate streetscape improvements in the right-of-way and building architecture. Since the adoption of the Manual, Staff has found it increasingly difficult to implement certain sections, particularly the streets cape component. While the current Manual addresses architectural requirements, it ignores site layout and development. Additionally, there are sections in the Manual which are conflicting. Staff is proposing an update to the Manual. The new document would be named the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The streetscape elements would be removed. The new Manual would apply to all multi-family (3 or more units), commercial and industrial developments and redevelopments in excess of a 50% increase in building footprint. Overlay areas have been included which establish building placement in relation to the street frontage. Design principles and standards have been created which will give developers and staff an expectation for site and building design. The revised Manual is the companion piece to the recently adopted Chapter 26 changes. Adoption of the revised Manual implements several of Council 's strategic plan goals. Clearly defined standards and guidelines and standards for infill development implement the goal of preparing for growth and opportunities. Design standards for multi-family development will help implement the goal of providing better quality housing stock. The goal of redeveloping major corridors is partly implemented by including requirements for pedestrian connections and pedestrian-scale development, making development more people oriented. This goal is also implemented by applying the standards to all commercial and industrial zone districts which are located along the City's major corridors. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Input was solicited from the Planning Commission on April 19,2007 and May 17, 2007. The Commission did not have any suggested changes or additions. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The revised Manual incorporates many of the ideas and regulations in the previous Manual, although there are many new requirements for site design that were not addressed in the previous Manual. The revised Manual eliminates many of the conflicting and confusing requirements and much of the redundancy of the previous Manual. Staff has met with the development community on several occasions to discuss the revised Manual, with positive response and several design professionals assisted in reviewing the document. Changes were made based on that review. Techniques and regulations of various other cities were researched and many included in the Manual have been implemented regionally and nationally. In several instances the new Manual provides developers choices for compliance in an effort to provide flexibility without dictating design. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Do not adopt the revised Manual; use the existing Manual. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact to the City as a result of adopting this Manual. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt the Architectural and Site Design Manual." Report Prepared by: Alan White Reviewed by: Attachments: 1. Architectural and Site Design Manual City of Wheat Ridge ARCHITECTURAL & SITE DESIGN MANuAL Revised May 2007 Acknowledgements Under the anthority granted by Section26-222.E of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM), originally adopted on 26 February 200 I is amended jointly by the Director of Community Development and Pnblic Works Director. ATTACHMENT 1 Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual I .'T~:Blii'~(3i!{~~~~Jl1l8m'S;: .>~'" , " ;. '. ." 1'. :.\~:J ,', :' ...l ,'~ '" ;", ~-_. .,,: ," , ~,,'~d Ii'/ '. . -, .. ~-.-" -'-c' , ,'. _ ~ -,~" .-1: c->.::,,'~>."". ., .__ , , " " ID:Jfi~ij~~8J:~h.;;i:~:~:i~;..D..,:.;'.~~?;;;i.~~..~'..,; .;: ::~S~":i~5~:':.;"'~";:.'i.';;;;1;' ,',: '- -~. .'- ';,.' . .- ,.":-, -:>,' : ". -. ,~," ,.";--.-" ~~~.-, ,,'}: .. - -~ : :- - ," ,~. ~ :~:-< .:.,,~::~,~,r -'-..; .. --<__'.1.1;;:.'- r, ,_' ~ to;' ";:' '~~\':;-. ",',.. ",'..-" .' ~". 0-0," -t;/'-, ,",.- '..' ,.,,'.-- .:),' "." . ".~", " ~", .' r '-,,'" ';-.~ __;' , '.-._,-:,,-.," ,., ".'" --'.0,.",' ~.:_ ~-; :;.1 ',,',.- " <::".- >,:'\' ~ - ~, ',1m '.,:':,.c" ',~ ?"-.;'." ,-,<~(,;, " " .. :; ~~-':;::- ;';;f<~',::,' .- """ -""'-;:'J',' - ";.' " ,<;: ~n" > ," ,.',_.':."\,",'C' .'-i};'e-'..- -',',"'.,' ""',: BMilli"^i;'imiiICb' 'So stafta .. <':"(<',", ,0' ,~<".' 26" -',,, < : : ,::::::~;;,%~ ;,i:::,e~?~:\~~~n1r:?i;;:~: r, " , ' . ,:~~:?~~~~~t;{::~, ' /:'::~.":;" .,OVerla F'i ' Sv..;.".~..' ';.~.:~.~:~;~:~~';;'.~~j'~..li'-....~.LU~~"f;~..;~)~-i-;::-:-;;:.,....~;.."'..~:;32.. -,,' ~ ,'-;.~ ~-"" , ':"", >' - ''",'',t:..::"<<: ~.~ ~~ ,"'-' ,',c" r_'-~ ;_. ' . ,;y;~:~ ~ '~l- - DefiDitiOIlS;:r..;.....;.....,'i......;.;.~.~.u.....;..;....n......................ii...~...;.......;............i.......,34 . -, .' ", '''.,;;~~~l~,:f~.-., ::;:_~:,~,,::},} ;,~>~,,_~;; ~~"J;:':i-~J;~;':~~~,.. -,~ <c':i;:" "-. .,~'O""",;,',: - ':~' , ~.<.,. . . ,-", ',' '- - ,;. .,',,',:.:.": ~.-. ,,:,,~~>:_ ___'.' - '-J .,'~[ . .. . . _'..,' _ . ,'....' _ ' . , '.~'oC..~':. -; ,,, '.' _ _ '.. ,,:;:,-.." ',",'" ,,' ,.,' ,'<.:.<.: '~f:< ,'.".,,' :IY;' ~->,,;,:,:'r~ ",,,,. , -.... .0,," ''''.~ ' ,.",:;: ;>'.-:,' Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 2 1. INTRODUCTION The Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) for the City of Wheat Ridge covers a variety of elements that will establish a clear blueprint for site development and architectural standards for connnerciaI, industrial and multi-family structures. The Manual contains goals, principles and examples which will provide consistent yet flexible design guidelines for the City of Wheat Ridge. A. Background: The Historical Context of Wheat Ridge's Character Wheat Ridge had its origins in the silver and gold rush days of Colorado in the late 1800's. Miners traveled back and forth between Golden, Blackhawk and Central City through what is now the City of Wheat Ridge, to Denver. Eventually, farmers settled Wheat Ridge and the routes between Denver and points west became established as the main thoroughfares we know today. Wheat Ridge t..~,.. an incorporated City in 1969. - -' ig, 1: The Wheat Ridge float in a 1914 parade along an arly Denver streetscave. , d e;icec haract:r in the cj;ity. On ional ver urban grid p . The and the struc older. Historically, many of the connnercial corridors were pleasant, tree-lined country lanes with smaller scale neighborhood- oriented retail shops. The proliferation of automobile travel as the main mode of transportation was at odds with creating pedestrian-friendly and pedestrian oriented developments. The suburban development patteI)l moved buildings from the street edge Fig. 2: An aerial view of Wheat Ridge's core commercial areas (Wadsworth Blvd 7nd 3Efh Avenue) showing the predominance of individual buildings surrounded OV parkin$! lots. Wheat Ridge ArchitecturaI and Site Design Manual 3 and placed large parking lots between the building and street What were once small-scale buildings with intimate settings are now disorganized streetscapes dominated by parking lots, over-scaled signs and under- utilized or non-existent sidewalks. Wheat Ridge's commercial corridors provide many benefits to the City and surrounding neighborhoods. These corridors serve as gateways into the City and establish the image of the City. They provide service, shopping, dining, cultural and entertainment opportunities for residents of the adjacent neighborhood, the city and the region. Business activity along these corridors provides a significant tax base for the City. The corridors can either connect or separate the residential neighborhoods and add to a sense of community pride. B. Purposes of the ASDM The City's current zoning code is to a large degree focused on "Greenfield" development - development of open land. The size of properties and proximity of the commercial corridors to Pig. 3: Wheat Ridge'sftrstpost office, nawpreservedin residential neighborhoods is not conducive to Greenfield ,the Wheat Ridge Historical Park. development Today, the major development opportunities in ommer edevelopment-o' ted, makin toappl Following the standards and procedures of this manual will also: . Bring about greater consistency and predictability in the City's design review process . Build upon and amplify the rules and regnlations of Chapter 26 Zoning and Development of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws . Implement the directions outlined in the City's Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy The ASDM is not intended to preclude an individual planner or architect's creativity. This Manual presents important, bnt general, design concepts. It is intended to address site and architectural design; two aspects of development which have been largely ignored in the City of Wheat Ridge. This Manual should be used in concert with Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. This Manual is not intended to be all inclusive; many aspects of site development have not been addressed. Where the Manual is silent, the Zoning Code should be consulted. It is intended that the Zoning Code will be amended to follow a form-based format, and this Manual will continue to provide consistent site and architectural design gnidance. There are several subareas within the City which address future development for a particular area of the City. These subareas are unique in character, and present different development and redevelopment opportuDities. Subarea plans have been created for these subareaS; plans which act as a blueprint for growth within the subareas. In addition to these subarea plans, a comprehensive plan also exists which provides Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 4 guidance for future development City-wide. Subarea plans may suggest or recommend specific desigu themes or inclusion of an area into one of the overlay districts shown on Figure 35. The requirements of this Manual may be modified in specific areas of the City through additional overlay zones. The Manual contains photographs and illustrations which should provide direction and clarity. Where the text in the Manual and graphics conflict, the text shall control. c. Overall Goals of the ASDM I. Encourage creative site and building desigu which in turn creates unique and sustainable places. 2. Major commercial areas and associated streets should be planned and desigued to balance traffic needs with those of pedestrians and adjacent land uses. 3. Buildings and landscaping should contribute to the physical definition of streets and sidewalks as civic places. 4. The desigu of buildings should acknowledge that the uses within buildings may change over time, while the form of the building and its relationship to the street is more enduring. Therefore the placement, form and desigu of buildings are integral and important aspects of regulating community development. 5. New buildings and streetscape should relate to any positive established character of existing buildings and streetscape desigu elements. Enhance edestrion oriented activity by providing a trian sc to businesses. 8. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Desigu Manual 5 II. APPLICABILITY A. Review Process All development within the Architectural Design Overlay Districts other than single-family and two-family homes shall be subject to the standards contained in the ASDM as well as the underlying zoning for the property. This Manual shall also apply to "major additions", as defined in Section V, Definitions. In the instance of a major addition, regnlations will not apply where infeasible. For example, if a major addition occurs to a building in the traditional area, and the existing building is located 50 feet from the front property line, the addition need not comply with the build-to area requirement as it would be nearly impossible. This shall not be construed to mean that noue of the regulations apply for major additions. This Manual is intended to be used as a supplement to the regnlations listed in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws (Zoning & Development). Where this Manual and the regulations of the Code of Laws are in conflict, this Manual takes precedence. In these standards the words "shall", "is" and "are" indicate required provisions; "should" indicates recommended provisions (guidelines); and "may" indicates optional provisions. To the extent that an approved site development application includes additional conditions or specific plan or design details, the requirements of approved site development application shall be in addition to those set forth in the ASDM. Terms used throughout the ASOM shall be accorded their commonly accepted meanings or as defined in Section V, Oefmitions. In the event of conflicts between these definitions and those of the Wheat Ridge Code, those of the ASOM shall take precedence for projects with the jurisdiction of the ASOM. 1. At the Pre-application Meeting the applicant will be invited to participate in a discussion with the ORC regarding the applicant's submittal. The ORC will provide assistance to the applicant by helping to interpret the goals, principles, guidelines and standards in the ASOM. If the ORC determines that -major adjustments to the Conceptual Design Plan are required, or that additional ORC review is necessary to provide adequate direction to the applicant, a follow-up Pre-application Meeting may be required. 2. The ORC will produce a written record of the pre-application meeting and provide such to the applicant(s) or agent of the applicant(s). 3. Subsequent submittals (e.g. Land Use Applications or Building Permit Applications) shall be consistent with the advice and direction given at the pre-application meeting. B. Pre-Application Meeting Submittal Requirements The following information must be submitted to the DRC prior to the Pre-Application Meeting: 1. General Information . Project title and location; . Request (include applicable approvals sought); . ,Examination of and written response to the Design Prin9iples listed below in Section C; . Date of submittal to the DRC; Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Mannal 6 o Contact information for applicant and all consultants. 2. Site Plan The site plan should contain existing and proposed conditions of the entire development ".~..-.;y, drawn to scale, showing at minimum the following detail: o Location of required setbacks for buildings and parking; o Location of all driveways, parking areas, loading areas and pedestrian walkways; o Location (footprints) of existing and proposed structures with entrances identified; o The location and type of any outdoor storage or trash disposal facilities; o Location and dimensions of all signs including setback dimensions; o Location, size, and number of parking spaces to be provided, including handicapped spaces. 3. Conceptual Architectural Plans o Preliminary elevations of any proposed structure(s) or additions to existing structure(s) with notations as to the types of materials and colors to be used; . Preliminary elevations of any accessory appurtenances such as dumpster enclosures. The following design principles shall be incorporated into each new commercial, industrial, mixed use or multi-family residential building or any l1ll\ior addition to any existing commercial, industrial, mixed use or multi-family building. Upon submittal for pre-application meetings, land use applications or building permits, the applicant shall, in writing, respond to each one of these design principles and explain how each principle is being met. The Design Review Committee shall determine compliance with the design principles. These design principles are broad goals to be achieved with development or redevelopment. The language relating to these design principles is somewhat nebulous. For example, commercial/industrial design principle number 2 states that "building design shall contain significant interest". The term "significant" is not quantifiable. The design standards listed in section III strive to further define each design principle, complete with diagrams and examples. By following the design standards in section III, the design principles will be achieved. Compliance with these design principles must be achieved to gain DRC approval of the site and building design. It should be noted that in most land use cases, the DRC is not the decision making body that approves an application. This Manual contains design standards which must be incorporated into the site and building design. Except where otherwise noted, these standards are mandatory. Graphic examples can be found in Section III of this Manual. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 7 CommerciallIndustrial Desilrn Princioles 1. Create a pedestrian travel system similar to a roadway network into, across and through the site. A connected, continuous pedestrian sidewalk system will make pedestrian activity more convenient and prevalent. 2. Building design shall contain significant interest, level of detail and hwnan scale. Where these elements are present on adjacent buildings and/or properties, building architecture and design shall be consistent with surronnding buildings. 3. Development or redevelopment shall minimize impact to surrounding properties. 4. Incorporate well designed landscaping which establishes a buffer between incompatible uses and clearly defines a street edge. 5. Site design shall foster both pedestrian and automobile traffic and safety, and shall include unique amenities and a level of interest to patrons and passers-by. 6. Parking areas shall be de-emphasized and made less prominent. 7. Signage shall be well designed and located strategically so as to lessen the impact of advertising. Multi-Familv Desilrn Princioles t 5. Parking areas shall be located in safe, convenient locations for residents and gnests. 6. Building and site design shall contain an ample amount of visual interest and avoid monotony or a "fonnulaic" design. Mixed use projects (a mix of commercial and residential) shall follow the Commercial and Indnstrial Design Principles and Design Standards. D. Varying From the Requirements The requirements listed in this Manual shall not be completely waived. The requirements are structured in a manner to provide some latitude for site and building design. Only a few requirements are exact; the build- to area or specific buffering requirements for example. For these 'exact' regnlations, and only these 'exact' regulations, the variance process in Section 26-115 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws applies. A variance cannot be processed for anything specifically prohibited in this Manual. For instance, a requirement exists which prohibits parking between the building fa~ade and front property line in the urban areas. This is not eligible for a variance. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 8 III. DESIGN STANDARDS The following mandatory desilffi sW'ldards shall be inw'l'v.~;~d into each new commercial and industrial site and building, as well as each major expansion of any existing commercial and industrial buildings. Major expansion is defined in Section V (Definitions). Each mandatory design standard relates to the design principles listed in Section II C. Compliance with these mandatory design standards will help ensure achievement of the design principles. The design principles are reiterated to show relevance and context with the site and building design standards. A. CommerciallIndustrial Design Standards Princinle: Create a nedestrian travel svstem similar to a roadwav network into. across and throueh the.. .~ite. A connected" continuous uedestrian sidewalk svstem will make fJedestrian activitv more convenient and nrevalent. I. The streets, bikeways, paths and trails of adjacent neighborhoods shall be extended into the proposed development. Although cu.~",,; o'ity is iu.,..v. .....t, traffic calming measures may be used to discourage short-cuts and diverting high volumes oftraflic through adjacent neighborhoods. 2. Continuous, wide pedestrian sidewalks shall be provided between buildings to promote a safe, pleasant ironm shall connect cent side "If ... Fig. 7: Interconnected parking lots and drive aisles with continuous sidewalks make this example pedestrianfriendly. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 9 4. In the traditional areas as shown in Figure 35, the area between the fayade of the building and the property line shall be reserved for pedestrian activity, outdoor seating or plazas and/or landscaping. This standard shall apply to that percentage of buildings required adjacent to street frontages in the contemporary areas as well. 5. Pedestrian entries into bnildings shall face the adjacent street. All facades ofbnildings facing any street or public space shall provide a level of finished architectural quality "l'l"Vl'.;ate to the public character of that street or space. The entranceways shall be clearly defined and be prominently identifiable. This shall not preclude the presence of additional subordinate entrances at the rear or side of a building. . . Fig. 8: This building is constructed to the build~to line at each streetfrontage. Only pedestrian activity occurs between theface of the building and the right-(Jf-way. The building entrance is clearly identified Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 10 6. Pedestrian walkways shall be constructed to minimum industry standards. Detailed accents such as brick, flagstone, scored or colored concrete shall be used at main entrances to delineate and accentuate the pedestrian travel way to the building. 7. Pedestrian walkways shall be continued across driveways, drive aisles in parking lots and intersections. At intersections, crosswalks with enhanced pavement are encouraged to provide for increased safety and to add an aesthetic element to the streetscape. Fig. 9: Photo afpedestrian paving Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 11 Princinle: Buildim! desirm shall contain simificant interest, level of detail and human scale. Where the.r;:fi. elements are nresent on adiacent buildinf!s and/or nronerties. buildinv architecture and desion shall hp. consistent with surroundino buildinos. 1. A building entrance of finished architectural quality shall face an adjacent street. All facades of buildings facing any street or public space shall provide a level of finished architectural quality a"".v".;ate to the public character of that street or space. Buildings shall have at least one significant pedestrian entty (used singly for one use or jointly for several uses) that faces the street or public way. Individual ground floor shops within a building should have a direct pedestrian entty. The primary entty of a building and/or its shop front shall be emphasized through changes in wall plane or building massing, differentiation in material and/or color, greater level of detail and enhanced lighting as well as pennanent signage. 2. Building facades that face a public street or plaza shall have at least one variation in plane depth (a minimum of four feet) for each every 50 linear feet (or portion thereof) for the length of the fa~ade. Canopies, awnings or other non-pennanent features will not count solely as a variation. Such a variation may be accomplished by recessed entries, porticos, upper level step-backs, donners, or any of the following offsets in the general plane of the fa~ade: columns, pilasters, protruding bays, reveals, projecting ribs, balconies, and cornices or eaves. 3. Building facades shall be designed to provide a human scale. Human scale and detail shall be incv. "v.u.~d into fa~ade design by the use of at least ee of the following methods: . strongly e>:pressed glazing mullions that create a three dimensional e><pression Fig.IO: This building has a prominent entrance feature whichfaces the street frontage. It contains variation in plane, farade and building materials. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 12 4. All building facades shall have one change in materials for each 10 feet (and portion thereot) of wall height. A change in material must be at least two feet in height. Masonry patterns, such as headers or rowlocks can count as a change of materials. Windows, canopies and doorways will not count as a change in materials. 5. Buildings shall be constructed of durable materials, such as brick, stone, integral colored textured concrete block, stucco, synthetic stone and masonry materials. Corrugated metal panels, plywood paneling, un-articulated large fonnat concrete panels, exposed raw concrete and vinyl siding are not allowed. Architectural metal and smooth faced concrete masonry units (C.M.U.) may be used as an accent, but shall not constitute more than 20% of any fa~ade. 6. The character of new development should relate to, and use the positive examples as design resources from the surrounding neighborhood, street patterns, and neighboring structures. The character of the surrounding neighborhood shall be established by the existing facades, building footprint, building materials, rooflines, and windows/doorways. A redevelopment should honor the basic patterns and positive architectural themes of nearby existing development. The materials and form of any addition to an existing building shall relate to the existing building. Buildings that express a standardized corporate identity are discouraged. ., Fig. 11: These buildings share similar durable ma/erials, form, envelope and height. Their orientanon tawards the street and distance from the street define a street edge. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 13 7. The transparency of groWld floor facades facing any street or pedestrian way, regardless of distance, shall be at least 60% and not more than 85%. Transparency shall be calculated as the percentage of the groWld floor elevation as measured from the finished grade at the base of the wall, to the second level finished floor elevation. Transparent doors may COWlt as part of the transparent area. Window mullions may be included in the transparent area calculations. However, structural elements may not be included in the transparency calculations. Opaque or reflective glass shall not be included in transparency calculations. If glass display cases are used, they must give the appearance of windows (at least 2 ' deep) and should be maintained with items of interest. For corner lots, the minimum percentage of transparency can be allocated from one street fayade to another. At no time can the p~, "~.....ge of transparency on a street frontage be less than 30%. 8. Opaque (solid) storefront security closures (rolling doors, etc.) that block the views into a building are not allowed. 9. For building fa~ades longer than 200 feet, at least I major identifYing object shall be incorporated into the building design. A major identifying object would include a cupola, rotanda, spire, dome, clock tower or similar architectural feature which creates visual interest. Fig. 12: This example contain3 a major identifying object and 60% transparency on two elevations which/ace a streetfrontage. 10. For buildings located in the traditional areas, at least 60% of the lot width on the ",:"''''J street frontage must be occupied by buildings located within the 0-12 build-to area. For example, on a primary street frontage where a lot is 100 feet wide, at least 60 feet of building fvv.",:"; must be constructed in the build-to area. The remaining 40% may be used to access, landscaping, access to parking in the rear or other uses pennitted by this Manual. For corner lots, this requirement can be reduced to 50% of the lot width on the primary frontage with at least 25% of the lot width of the secondary street frontage occupied by buildings located within the build-to area. For smaller lots, the Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 14 ability to access the parking in the rear must be maintained. At no time shall this requirement preclude the establishment or maintenance of a drive aisle to access the side or rear of the building. 11. For buildings located in the contemporary areas, at least 40% of the lot width on the primary street frontage must be occupied by buildings located within the 0-20 foot build-to area. For example, on a primary street frontage where a lot is 100 feet wide, at least 40 feet of the building footprint must be constructed in the build-to area. The remaining 60% may be used for access, parking, landscaping or other uses permitted by this Manual. In the instance of a comer lot with more than one street frontage, the build-to area shall be established at the primary street frontage (area of main entrance). The required setback at the secondary street frontage shall be consistent with the applicable zone district in which the property is located. The requirements for maintaining the sight distance triangle as defined in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws shall be followed and observed. For smaller lots, the ability to access the parking in the rear must be maintained. At no time shall this requirement preclude the establishment or maintenance of a drive aisle to access the side or rear of the building. Fig. 13: This building occupies more than 50% olthe lot width at the build-to area on the primary streetfrontage. The building occupies in excess 0125% afthe secondary streetfrontage as well, far surpassing the traditional overlay minimum requirements. Princivle: DeveloDment or redevelovment shall minimize imnact to surrnundinu DTonerties. I. All loading equipment and service areas shall be adequately screened and located towards the rear of the building. 2. All rooftop equipment and trash areas shall be screened from view so as not to be visible from the property line viewed from ground level. Screening elements andlor enclosures shall be composed of fonus, materials and colors that are either an extension of the building's exterior form, material and Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 15 color palette, or neutral forms, materials and colors designed to minimize their visual impact. All trash areas shall be incorporated into the building design and screened with full wall enclosures or wing- walls and shall not be located between the building fayade and the right-of-way. ..a...", -A.. '-L Fig.14: This electrical equipment is screened by a wingwall and doors, and is located to the rear of/he building. .1-A.. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 16 3. The edges of new and existing commercial development shall provide a safe, quiet and visually pleasant transition to adjacent residential neighborhoods. Larger buildings should be located adjacent to commercial corridors and transition to smaller buildings closer to residential, low-density neighborhoods. Landscape and architectural treatments such as screen walls may be used as edge buffers. 4. There shall be a transition between incompatible uses on adjacent properties. The transition may include locating the building away from the dissimilar use, transitioning the building height to minimize impact or increasing landscape buffering. 5. Particular care shall be given to ensure development will not adversely impact the supply of light to adjacent properties, nor shall large shadows cast on adjacent properties. The height of any new building or major addition shall be of the same scale as adjacent buildings. Fig. 15: The commercial buildings transition to the residential structures. The forms and heights of the commercial structures decrease with proximity to residential structures. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 17 Princinle: Incorvorate well desir:ned landsca7);nf! which est{7hlishes a!!'dk:,.lyetwe~J'l incomDatible uses and clearlv defines a street edCTp., I. Except in traditional areas as shown in Figure 35, a mmunum IO-foot landscape area must be established behind the right-of-way on all street frontages. Street trees shall be planted within this landscape strip consistent with the standards located within Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 2. A minimum IO-foot landscape buffer must be established between any parking areas and the property line, and between any adjacent property which contains a residential use. The buffer can be reduced to 5 feet if a six foot fence is installed on the t',Vt'~"f line. This shall not apply to drive aisles or drive through lanes. . . Fig.16: The commercial property incorporates a heavy :.....,.;..~'...~.. bqffer on the property line which is adjacent to a residential use. A six-footfence and trees help screen the parking area. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 18 3. The space between adjacent buildings shall ,be minimized, clearly defining a continuous building fayade. In these instances, the buildings shall meet all applicable fire and building codes for fire resistant construction. Fig. 17: These multiple buildings create a continuous buildingfafade and defined street edge, making the area more pedestrian friendly, Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 19 Princivle: Site desivn shall foster both vedestrian and automobile traffic and safetv. and shall include uniaue amenities and a level of interest to vatrons and na~sers-bv. Two of the following techniques must be used in traditional areas. One technique must be used in the, Cvu~m"orary and suburban areas: . Plazas, courtyards and arcades are strongly encouraged in all commercial areas. Buildings should be placed to enclose courtyards or plazas on at least three sides. These features shall be located directly adjacent to sidewalks which access the right-of- way and may contain seating areas, open eating areas, landscaping, public art and fountains. These areas shall count towards the minimum landscaped area required by the Code of Laws. . Pedestrian seating should be accommodated onsite, particularly near entrances. Seating may include benches, movable chairs, seat walls and planter walls. Seating opportunities will encourage additional pedestrian use of the streetscape areas. Benches and movable chairs are a simple way to help establish the identity of the community along the street. Fig.18: Typical courtyard creates a public gathering space. Fig. 19: The courtyard is enclosed on three sides. Ample outdoor seating is provided which gtvesjUll views to the right-of-way and sidewalk. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 20 The following are all required elements of site design: . Front parking lots shall be interconnected so as to allow continuous vehicle passage without re- entering the street. . Generous sidewalks at the store fronts shall be connected to on-street sidewalks adjacent to all rights-of-way. . Continuous, wide pedestrian sidewalks shall be provided between buildings to promote a safe, pleasant walking environment. . Parking lots and drive aisles shall be arranged to maximize the connectivity and continuity of pedestrian walkways and minimize the distances pedestrians must travel between buildings. Pedestrian walkways shall be provided which minimize the need for pedestrians to travel in unsafe areas, such as drive aisles and behind parked cars. - . Fig. 20: These properties have interconnected walkways and parking areas. Property divisions are obscured creating a strong pedestrian environment. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 21 Princinle: Parkinv areafif shall be de-emnha.~ized and made less nrominent. I. In traditional areas, parking shall be located to the side or rear of the building. If a building is located on a corner lot, any parking located adjacent to the secondary street frontage must be behind the midpoint of the wall facing the secondary street frontage. 2. Parking access drives shall be consolidated to minimize curb cuts and minimize breaks in the o.u."Juut facades. 3. In non-traditional areas surface parking and drives are allowed between a public street and a building fa~ade when screened from the street by either a low wall and/or landscape buffer of at least ten (10) feet in width. If a landscape buffer is utilized, trees and shrubs must be planted to further soften the parking edge. 4. Except where separated by buildings, all parking lots must be interconnected to allow users to circulate without having to re-enter a street. 5. Large parking lots shall be divided into smaller segments and should be generously planted with shade trees. Large, open parking areas are to be avoided. g. .. ~ ... ~ .:; ~ '" ." C S ... '" Primary 5~t Fronlilge Building Wall ----- midpoint Fig. 21: An example of a parking area on a corner lot in a traditional area. The parking is located behind the midpoint of the building wall atfjacent to the secoruJary streetfrontage. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 22 6. Shared parking is encouraged for traditional overlay areas and developments with limited parking availability. Shared parking recognizes that various uses utilize parking to different degrees throughout the day. Shared parking is calculated using the Sharing Factor Matrix below (Fig. 21). In the event of mixed-uses, the actual parking required is calculated by adding the total number of spaces required by each separate function and dividing the total by the 6}'}"0}'.;ate factor from the Sharing Factor matrix. For example: If the residential function requires 10 spaces and the office portion requires 12 spaces, independently they would require 22 spaces, bnt when divided by the sharing factor of lA, they would require ouly 16 spaces. A second way to use the sharing factor is if there is a total of 22 spaces available on the site, multiplying this by the factor 104 produces the equivalent 000 spaces. Building uses may be sized to a functional density corresponding to 30 parking spaces. (Note: When three functions share parking, use the lowest factor so that enough parking is assured.) 7. Where possible, on-street parking may be counted towards the required parking counts. On street parking shall not be allowed on State highways, arterials or in locations where the street width cannot accommodate the parked vehicle. When adjacent to City-owned parking lots, parking may be accommodated in a City-owned parking lot. Fig. 22: These parking areas are interconnected, reducing the need to re.enter the street. I I I Residential I Lad"in" I Office I Retail Shared Part<in.ll, Factor Residential I LOd"in9 J :;;;::>~i ~;:~ "). ,,~~;:~:~:~'~;;.I 1 Office Retail I "1.4 ,.',," ," .i,1.2 ,..' 'I "1.7 .. ,'. ' 1.3... ""....,1"""..,., ',.,'..,1.2'; . _ ",~'.;,1:2 '1~,:-~,,-i~: -",,;,: ~";:;1 I Fig. 23: Shared Parkingfaciar table Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 23 Principle: Signage shall be well designed and located strategically so as to lessen the impact of advertising. 1. Innovative and unique signs and graphics are encouraged. 2. The structura1 support of projecting signs should be integrated into the design of the sign, either by being simple and inconspicuous, or by being creative in the use of structural elements, lighting, color and materials. 3. Projecting signs should not be located closer than twenty-five (25) feet apart unless the signs work together to make a unified and compatible design or the sign group is integral to the building architecture, reinforcing a significant building feature such as a primary entry. 4. Projecting signs are allowed and encouraged in the urban areas. There is no setback from the right-of- way for projecting signs. Encroachments into the right-of-way are permitted provided the appropriate approvals from the City are granted. - ";",.;,,~,:,,,,":-_<'+::<;'i.: '-,,~ . Fig. 24: Projecting signage should be integrated into design in urban areas. 5. Consolidated monument signage is encouraged in multiple use developments. Monument signs are required for new development, and must be located within a landscaped area. Pole signs are not allowed with new development, unless the development is located within Y. mile of the interstate and a highway oriented sign is proposed. 6. The materials of a freestanding sign should be the same as, or closely related to, the materials used on the building to which the sign is related. F~g. 25: This monument sign advertises/or the entire multi-use building. . Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 24 7. Building wall signs should fit within the architectural features of the fa~ade (e.g. not overlapping columns or covering windows), and complement the building architecture. Wall signs may extend beyond physical lease space. 8. 9. Fig. 26: The wall signage on this building utilizes canopies and recessed areas on thefaeade to advertise. 10. Sign faces shall be of a darker hue with light colored text. Fig. 27: These signs have a dark background with light text. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 25 B. Multi-Family Residential Design Standards Principle: Provide an ample amount of usable open space for residents to congregate in a central, convenient location. I. At least 10% of the ",v"",'j must be dedicated to open space for use by the residents and tenants of any multi-family development. The open space shaIl be usable and contain amenities for play or congregation. Acceptable amenities include play structures, picnic tables, benches, sporting areas such as soccer goals, tennis courts or basketball courts. These areas must contain irrigated sod or cv~,,~~ble landscaping eqnivalent. 2. Detention areas may be used as open space provided these areas are improved properly. The design of the detention/open space shaIl not aIlow standing water. . . Fig. 28: This multi-fami/y development contains ample open space to be used as recreation areafor the tenants. Wheat Ridge ArchitecturaI and Site Design Manual 26 Principle: Building design shall contain significant interest, level of detail and human scale. Where these elements are present on adjacent buildings and/or properties, building architecture and design shall be consistent with surrounding buildings. 1. For buildings with one entrance to many units, the public entries shall have pedestrian connectivity into the site from adjacent streets. For buildings with multiple entrances, pedestrian connectivity shall be provided to each main entrance at each ground floor unit. All facades of buildings facing any street or public space should provide a level of finished architectural quality al'l"Ul'.;ate to the public character of that street or space. Buildings should have at least one significant pedestrian enlIy (used singly for one use or jointly for several uses) that faces the street or public way. Individual ground floor units within a building should have a direct pedestrian enlIy. The primary entry of a building should be emphasized through changes in wall plane or building massing, differentiation in material andlor color, greater level of detail and enhanced lighting as well as permanent signage. 2. Building facades should be designed to provide a hnman scale. Hnman scale and detail should be incorporated into fa~de design by the use of at least three of the following methods: . reveals . belt courses . cornices 4. Buildings shall be constructed of durable materials, such as brick, stone, integral colored textured concrete block, stucco, synthetic stone, vinyl siding and masonry materials. Corrugated metal panels. plywood paneling, un-articulated large fonnat concrete panels, and exposed raw CVUU"" are not allowed. Architectural metal and smooth faced concrete masonry units (C.M.V.) may be used as an accent, but shall not constitute more than 20% of any fa~ade. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 27 5. At least 25% of any fayade visible from public right-of-way shall contain stone, stucco, brick or similar resilient mortar building material. 6. The character of new development should relate to, and use the positive examples as design resources from the surrounding neighborhood, street patterns, and neighboring structures. A redevelopment should honor the basic patterns and architectural themes of nearby existing development. Fig. 29: This multi-fami/y development contains similar building materials as the mixed use development on the aq;acent parcel. The structw-es are all afthe samefarm and bulk. .A.. ~ .L.A.. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 28 Principle: Building and site design shall contain an ample amount of visual interest and avoid monotony or a "formulaic" design. 1. If the development includes multiple main building structures, each structure shall be unique in size, elevation height, shape, roof line and orientation to prevent a standardized site design. Dormers should be used to break up simple roofforms. 2. Building spacing and orientation shall vary between buildings. 3. Accessory buildings shall not be located in the front yard, or located in a build-to area in the traditional or contemporary areas. If possible, detached garages or carports should be accessed from an alley or rear drive. Individnal and common storage areas (such as for maintenance equipment) shall be considered in the initial design of the main structure(s) and incorporated into the design of the main structure or garage. 4. Detached structures shall be of the same building material type as the main structures, Fig. 30: This multi-family development contains varied 7ooftines. While the units have similar themes, they differ in scale, setback and materials used. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 29 Principle: Each fQl;ade should have a significant number of porches, balconies and window openings. Each entranceway to the building or unit shall be clearly defined 1. For buildings with multiple exterior entrances to multiple units, each individual unit entrance must be defmed and must contain a variation in two of the following ways: . Change in setback . Change in height . Change in materials For buildings with multiple units served by one common entrance, there must be at least one change in plane for each 50 feet of wall length. The change in plane can be accomplished by: . Change in setback . Change in height . Change in materials . Addition of porches/patios 2. At least 25% of each elevation shall contain openings such as doors or windows. For example, if a fa9ade contains 1,000 square feet, 250 square feet of the fa9ade must be treated with openings such as windows, doorways, orches, balconies or similar tr lInent. Fig. 31: These townhomes have clearly identified entrances, staggered setbacks. varying heights and building materials. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 30 Principle: Parking areas shall be located in sqfe, convenient locationsfor residents and guests, 1. At least 33% of the supplied parking spaces shall be within carports or garages. 2. Detached garages and carports are not allowed within the front setback area, or if located in a traditional or cvmc<vporary area, within the build-to area. 3. Sidewalks shall be provided from parking areas to the main entrance of each building. These sidewalks shall fonn a network for pedestrian traffic. 4. The parking areas shall be well lit to provide security for owners, tenants and guests. 5. When multiple garages or carports are attached as one structure, there shall be a clear delineation between parking stalls or garages. There shall be a minimum recess of 3 feet between each garage space. The garage or carport structure shall have similar building materials to the main structure. 6. The vehicular access garage doors on detached garages shall not face the primary street frontage. Fig. 32: The detached garages which serve these townhomes are located in the rear of the properly. Pedestrian connections are present between the garages and the units. The garages and main buildings are of similar building materials. The garage doors do notface the primary streetfrontage. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Desigu Manual 31 IV. OVERLAY AREAS The City contains three overlay areas: traditional, contemporary and suburban. These three areas are identified on the map on page 39 (Figure 35). These areas are established to dictate placement of the building as it relates to the street frontage. All of the design standards and principles apply in these overlay areas. A. Traditional Overlay Traditional areas have a neo-traditional character - wide sidewalks are located in front of the stv..:: v~";, strong pedestrian presence on the sidewalks, buildings are located much closer to the street and parking areas are located behind or beside the building facade. These traditional areas are intended to be more pedestrian oriented thereby creating more a vibrant, walkable environment, a precursor to mixed use. A consistent street edge should be established in the traditional areas, with parking areas located in the side or rear yard. The percentage of buildings shall be calculated by measuring all building facades which face the primary street frontage. Of this total, 60% of the collective building fa~ade measure shall be located in the 0-12 foot build-to area. Nothing in this section shall preclude more than 60% of the collective building facades from being located within the build-to area. A 0-12 foot build-to area is established in the traditional areas. At least 60% of the linear measure of the building facade which faces the primary street frontage must be located within this build-to area. A setback as defined in the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws establishes a minimum line where a building must be located behind. The build-to area establishes a twelve-foot window for location of the building fa~ade in close e front p Where a setback d' tates ce a be located the -to window w d. Fig. 33: This building is an example of development in the traditional area. Fig. 34: This building occupies the required build-to area in a traditional overlay area. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 32 B. Contemporary Overlay Contemporary overlay areas are intended to incorporate elements of the traditional areas while allowing more flexibility in building placement. A 0-20 foot build-to area is established in the wm'mpv.wj areas. At least 40% of the linear measure of the building facade which faces the primary street frontage must be located within this build-to area. In the case of multiple buildings on one single parcel, the build-to area applies to the property as a whole. In this situation, 40% of the total sum of all building facades which face the primary street frontage must be located within this build-to area. For instance, on a property which contains multiple buildings with a total measure of 2,000 linear feet of building facades, 800 lineal feet of building fa~ade must be constructed within the build-to area. When multiple buildings are present, the requirement for facades within the build-to area may be applied to many buildings, or one building. The intent is not to require each building to be located within the build-to area. In the instance of a corner lot with more than one street frontage, the build-to area shall be established at the primary street frontage (area of main entrance). The required setback at the secondary street frontage shall be consistent with the applicable zone district in which the property is located. The requirements for maintaining the sight distance triangle as defined in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws shall be followed and observed. The percentage of buildings shall be calculated by measuring all building facades which face the primary street frontage. Ofthis total, 40% of the collective building fa~ade measure shall be located in the 0-20 foot othing . shall preclude mo than 40% u' . the bu D. Inclusion in an Overlay Area Properties are shown in ,a particular overlay area (traditional, contemporary or suburban) in Figure 35. Where a property owner wishes to include his or her property into another overlay area, a written request must be submitted to the Director of Community Development requesting this inclusion. A P'Vt""j owner can only request inclusion into an overlay area which is more intensive than the district his or her t'''P'' ') currently resides. For example, a property owner who owns a property shown in the suburban area may request inclusion into the contemporary area, or from the contemporary area into the traditional area. A property owner with a property in a traditional area may not seek inclusion into the suburban area. Additionally, the Director can, at his or her sole discretion, include a property in an overlay area. A property can be included into an overlay area based upon adjacency to other areas, recent development trends or recommendations in an adopted subarea plan. The Director also has the ability to interpret the overlay area map (Fig. 35) which identifies the separate overlay areas. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 33 V. DEFINITIONS Amenity Zone An area along the street curb where trees, planters, furnishings and lighting are arranged. This area typically ranges from 5 to 12 feet in width. It usually replaces the tree lawn in more intense commercial developments. Architectural Bay The area between two vertical elements, usually structural supports, that are usually spaced in repetition. Articulation A juncture in the face of a building that generally provides relief in an otherwise flat surface. Attached Sidewalk A sidewalk which is attached to the back of the street curb. Belt Course Usually referred to in masorny construction as a continuous row of a ,,~~.-m of masorny around the fa~ade of a bnilding. B An area established adjacent to the primary street ontage where a uilding (or portion thereof) must be located. The build-to area differs by overlay zone: traditional, cv...-..."orary and suburban. Bulk The three dimensional volume of a building. CDOT Colorado Department of Transportation Caliper The diameter of the trunk of a tree measured 6 inches above the ground. Character A viewer's impression of the elements which make up a particular ~o.,.,._,ition of the landscape, trees, buildings, space, furniture, materials and colors. Commercial InfiU New construction of a building or buildings in a commercially zoned district. Commercial Street A street where the primary activity is to provide ,goods and services to the public. An area of shops, stores, service businesses, and offices. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 34 Corner Lot A lot which fronts at least two public streets. Curb Cut Any break in the street curb for a driveway which provides vehicular access from the street. Curb Ramp A sloping area of the sidewalk which allows for access of people with disabilities, wheelchairs, pedestrians and bicycles. Detached Sidewalk A sidewalk parallel, but not connected, to the street. Typically, detached sidewalks are separated from the curb with a tree lawn. EIFS Exterior Insulating Finish System or a synthetic stucco building material. Elevation The exterior face of a building. The north elevation is the north side of the building (as seen by looking south). Form The three dimensional shape and structure of a building. Groundcovers Low growing plant materials which are typically used in place of turf in tree lawns and as foreground plants in landscape shrub beds. Ground covers usually do not exceed 6" in height. Hardscape Exterior ground surface areas which are paved with some impervious material. Human Scale Proportions of elements that relate to the size of a human body. Icon A sign whose form suggests its meaning. Luminaires The light source of a light fixture. Typically located on poles or are wall mounted. Mass The exterior form and shape of a building. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 35 Major Additions Development (or redevelopment) which increases existing building square footage by 50% or more. Median A raised island of paving or planting located in the center of the street dividing the two ways of travel along a street. Mixed-Use A development that has a mixture of different uses within its boundaries. Mixed use developments typically contain commercial on the ground floor and residential above, or if a one story building, commercial in front with residential behind. Mullion An upright dividing bar in a window or screen. Overlay Ar~a An area of the City designated to identifY different build-to areas. All design principles and standards are applicable in the three overlay areas. Public Frontage The area between the back of curb and the ROW line. Residential Street A street which provides access to primarily residential uses. Reflective Glass Glass that has a percentage of outdoor visible light reflectivity greater than 19%. Reveal A space or an indention in the surface of a building that separates materials or is used as an accent in the field of the same material. Right-of-way The area of the street that is in public ownership. They area between private property and street is referred to as the right-of-way. Scale The proportions of elements that relate to the street in relation to a human or automobile. Scale affects the arrangement of streetscape elements to form spaces that are comfortable for pedestrians and drivers alike. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manualf 36 Secondary Street Frontage The property line perpendicular to the primary street frontage. The secondary street frontage is only applicable for lots with mnltiple street frontages. Sidewalk A paved surface expressly intended for pedestrian use. Splash Strip A paved strip along the back of the curb that provides protection for plant areas and tree lawns from chemicals and sand spread on the street. Step-out Strip A paved strip along the back of the curb that provides an area for stepping out of vehicles parked along the curb. Streets cape The landscape, pedestrian or other improvements within the public right-of-way. It is typically an area between the curb and right-of way line, but it may be in some cases, within easements adjacent to the right- of-way. the streetscape ches, planters, ds, mailbo lawn. Tree Lawn The area between the back of the curb and the detached sidewalk. Universal Design Design that accommodates people with all ranges of physical abilities. Xeriscape An "w.v"vh to planting design using established landscape and horticultural principles to reduce water consumption and maintenance oflandscapes. Zero Lot Lines Where no setback is required between the building and the property line. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 37 BffiLlOGRAPHY Citv af Wheat Rid"e Zanin" Ordinance. February 26 2001, City of Wheat Ridge. Wad.warth Boulevard Carridar Transoartation. Land Use and Desi"n Plan. May 12, 1999, City of Wheat Ridge. !lihlia"raohkal Sketches. Earlv Settlers af Wheat Rid"e, 1976, Researehed by the Wheat Ridge Historical Committee and the Wheat Ridge Centennial-Bicentennial Commission. .Cauntv Wale Tran..nartatian Plan. April 1998, A cooperative effort of Jefferson County, City of Arvada, City of Broomfield, City of Golden, City of Lakewood, City of Westminster, and City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Standards and Guide for Traffle Cantral far Street and Hi"hwav Canstruction. Maintenance. Utilitv. and Incident Mana"ement Oneratians. September 3, 1993, U.S. Department of Transportation, . . Federal Highway Administration. Part VI afthe Manual an Unifarm Traffic Cantrol Devices (MUTCDl I988 Education of MUTCD. Revision 3, September 3, 1993, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Landscane Vacahularv. 1964, by Warner L. Marsh, Miramar Publishing Co., Los Angeles, California. ~~'. Wheat Ridge Architectural and Site Design Manual 38 ITEM NO: 1,1), REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION rIJ ~. ."-. ,\II, - ~ _ ~0 ~ .,,', . -~"'- 1? ' ~~)~,S1Q! -, 0'1 ~~_ G, I~ 0>' ',-. ::c""~- :> _.' ~ -- . ~"')P1 0f$~ '7'0 o'~ Ilu WI COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11,2007 TITLE: APPROVAL OF RFP-07-16 MARKETING AND BRANDING PROJECT TO COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP, LLC IN THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $30,490.00 D PUBLIC HEARING IZI BIDSIMOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date: D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ) Quasi-Judicial: D Yes . O~)r#) Deputy City Manager . It' IZI No -UJ.-uw~/JJvfi fofCity Manager If EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: In 2006, City Council identified a Marketing and Branding Project as a top priority in the City. The purpose of the Marketing and Branding Project is to assess the need for a new brand and logo. The Project will consist of the following elements: · Conducting a comprehensive inventory of current City Logo uses. · Creating a new brand and logo for the City of Wheat Ridge. · Creating standards for use (a Standards Manual), including applying standards to elements such as signage, printed materials, vehicle graphics, stationary, forms, and other applications. Following approval of this award by City Council, the consultant will begin work on July 12, 2007. Staff has scheduled the consultant to make a project kick-off presentation to City Council at the Monday, August 6, 2007 City Council Study Session. On May 2, 2007, nine (9) bids were received. All bids met the initial bid requirements. The Evaluation Committee reviewed and scored the proposals. Five firms were short listed and invited for interviews. The number one overall ranking firm after the interviews was Communication Infrastructure Group, LLC of Evergreen, Colorado. Staff recommends award to Communication Infrastructure Group, LLC based on qualifications and experience in the not to exceed amount of $30,490.00. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: No Commission/Board recommendation is required for this project. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: N/A ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: No award of the Marketing and Branding Project will delay the moving forward with the project as outlined as a goal in the 2007 City Council Strategic Plan. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for this project has been approved as the Marketing and Branding Project line item of the 2007 City Operating Budget in the amount of $50,000. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve award of RFP-07-16 Marketing and Branding Project to Communication Infrastructure Group, LLC of Evergreen, Colorado in the Not to Exceed Amount of $30,490.00." or, "I move to deny award ofRFP-07-16 Marketing and Branding Project for the following reason(s) " Initiated by: Report Prepared by: Reviewed by: Heather Geyer, Assistant to the City Manager/PIO Heather Geyer, Assistant to the City Manager/PIO Linda Trimble, Purchasing Agent Attachments: I. Bid Tabulation Sheet 2. Vendor Proposal CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BID TABULATION PROJECT: MARKETING & BRANDING CONSULTANT BID/PROPOSAL NO. RFP-07-16 BID DUE DA TElTIME 05/02107 by 4:00 pm REQUESTING OEPT.lDIVISION CITY MANAGER VENDOR 80M/'.€- i.luuJ MuJl1p".tt/-y' bl'f\frltULl~.afJ'()Vl -r/rle.- Duran )I. A$5()~a.N..S er$Hve. Inf~<I! &ml.(J ., f7)1Lj) -I LOCATION (},r.l.e/~ h;r/- e-DIIl ns b.erd I"'(! ell! brlaJcl-P,,? , . c:'IDES6RIIimiI@riF~CJalilS;lSER"7ICES~':< ',.,., <,'.'-. -. ,',,'.," rr;' r;: - .. ~';' ';~"W ;-:':~.'.:'.\.- ~''''; - . . -I SIGNATURE PAGE '1e5 Ye-S 'iR-S Yes )I. ACCEPTS VISA No 'Ie, No Yct-5 n QUALIFICATIONS 11,5> Yes Yes Yes ::I: 'YLS YB Ve~ ~t.S i: EXPERIENCE YtS Ye--S Yes Ye.S m APPROACH Yes Yes Y-fP Yes Z FEE SCHEDULE -I ILLEGAL ALIEN FORM Yes. 'lei> y~ YeP ~ ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM 1 Yts No Yl.0 'It}> J:\BID TABULATION SHEETS\RFP-07-16.doc OPENEDBY-JJ~ biRaa Triml3le, P'II:"Ra~iR~ Aacrf,. WITNESSED BY ~ A/I~~ PAGE-1-DF -t- KJ>ra..JC,. Orhlf- 1x. lusIljft- U!+rd-rm b.tn vu- . ~,~ Yes. Ye.s /Jo y' e,s , Ye.s y~ YL5 Yes Yes Yes '1e.,s _Yes Y,s Yes AilJ AJlJ ""ffi5IPROPOSAL NO. RFP..o7-16 BiQOUE DATElTIME 05/02107 by 4:00 pm REQUESTING OEPT.J01V1SiON CITY MANAGER L . 'VENDOR . P&M . \.jC\.~ WLl/!JI 11.._,'" At:i.>ltfft5u,.0 tytJJhVl t::1w7 LOCATION ~~nfgJ[l/;L' iffYI;Il'..u.Jrxrl ~'J.i!tI J!1eSCBirp'flOfll'~)!l.ej\"$:I.$\i,B<Yi}l~S' . .,.:.:~t",,,.,,,;,J:'..,nJ"rc ""N\ ",'" '. ............,......,'::,'-'",," ,'" SIGNATURE PAGE ~~ ~€f> ~.t.$ - ACCEPTS VISA 'ItS ~O "'its QUALlFlCA1l0". ~,'it>~' EXPERIENCE _ ~ ~es Yes APPROACH 'Its 'Je-S 'I es FEE SCHEDULE No \fe-s \f e- $ - - - ILLEGAL ALIEN FORM Yes Ye..S Ye; - - ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM 1 rJO N/) 'ye..!7 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BID TABULATION PROJECT: MARKETING & BRANDING CONSULTANT . - - - -=D;.~,,2~~ WITNESSED BY b.t.Mn P1.;.ML1l.l.I PAGE~ OF f0 ~.-;~'~'" - 1 \ \ L L---- J:161D TABULATION SHEETSIRfP-07-16.dOC Foreseeable issues in the implementation of this project 1. Through our experience in this area - particularly on projects financed using public funds - we recognize the possibility that we may encounter resistance from members of the public. Their objection will likely be to question the need for this effort; asking "Why is the City is spending money on a logo when I've got a huge pothole our-in front of my house?" To counteract this resistance, we recommend creating key messages and a Q&A document that address the need for such an overall brand audit and redefinition and help frame the expenditure of funds in the proper context. 2. CIG will deliver the complete scope of services outlined in this proposal within the timeframe above, provided that the City of Wheat Ridge can meet the necessary review ahd feedback timeframes. Once the timeline is formalized following the project kick-off meeting, any adjustments in turnaround times for public or city input will impact the project delivery schedule. Previous roles in presenting and attending meetings with citizens or council: As mentioned in our presentation of case studies and past experience, CIG has the expertise the City of Wheat Ridge needs to conduct a public involvement / public input program the community will respect. Whether it is our work for RID, Adams County, City of Thornton, Cherokee's redevelopment of the former Gates Rubber Factory site or Denver's Transportation Expansion (T-REX) Project, CIG has the skills, experience and political savvy required to ensure and secure public input and support for the Wheat Ridge brand and identity project. Fee Schedule CIGHourlyR~tes; Executive Oversight Project Management Copywriting Graphic Design Account Coordination Reimbgrsable ~enses; Mileage: Copies: Long distance charges: Courier / postage: Travel: $150 $100 $90 $85 $45 $ .485 / mile (federal reimbursable rate) at cost at cost at cost at cost, as approved by client In Closing: CIG respectfully submits this proposal in response to the City of Wheat Ridge's RFP #07-16, and based on the scope of work we estimate our fees at $30,490. We believe CIG is uniquely qualified and experienced to perform the scope of services you have outlined. We look forward to working closely with you and the people of your community - always exceeding their expectations and helping you achieve complete success. ATTACHMENT 2 tf ,. , , , , , , , , , , , , .. " , , , , " " " " " " " " " " . . . . . . . . . . . tt: ITEM NO: l. f", REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION 'l~$'~ !lIT w~j COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11,2007 TITLE: APPROVAL OF RFP-07-04 VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCAL (VOIP) TELEPHONY SYSTEM TO MILESTONE NETWORKS IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $325,250.83 D PUBLIC HEARING IZI BIDSIMOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING (Date: D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ) Quasi-Judicial: D ..Q1;.=lt~ Deputy City Manager - IZI No City~Q.Jt EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City's current phone and voicemail system is over 12 years old and is in need of replacement due to the growing frequency of failures and anomalies. The telephone system consists of two MiTel telephone switches, an auto attendant system with voice mail, as well as three Nortel telephone switches and voice mail at the remote sites. The telephone system currently has 500 extensions and voice mailboxes serving every department in the City. While it has functioned well during the past decade, there are many limitations, including archaic features, of the existing technology. In addition, the MiTel voice mail system is no longer supported by the manufacturer as of January 2007. A request for proposal was issued by the Purchasing Division and ten bids were received on April 17,2007. All bids met the initial bid requirements. A ten person committee, comprised of representatives from all City divisions, based its recommendation on the lowest most responsive and responsible proposal. Staff has evaluated the bids and checked references and recommends an award to Milestone Network in the amount of$325,250.83. This updated technology solution will upgrade, unifY and standardize all telephone infrastructure and equipment to create a more reliable, feature rich and seamless telecommunications and data network. It will also provide for better methods and logic to enable citizens to contact departments and address the City's call routing issues. The new VOIP technology will also permit the IT Division to better and more easily manage the phone system from a centralized command and control interface, COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: None STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The scheduled and budgeted replacement of obsolete phone equipment at all sites, ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Traditional PBX phone systems, but IT decided VOIP is the technology of the future. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Staff recommends awarding the purchase of the new phone system to MileStone Networks in the total amount of$325,250,83. This project was discussed with Council during the 2007 budget process and these funds were approved as part of the 2007 budget. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the award ofRFP-07-04 VOIP Telephone System to Milestone Networks of Englewood, Colorado in the total amount of$325,250.83". or, "I move to deny authorization for the City of Wheat Ridge to purchase a VOIP Telephone System from Milestone Networks for the following reason(s) " Report Prepared by: Reviewed by: Michael Steinke, IT Manager Linda Trimble, Purchasing Agent Patrick Goff, Deputy City Manager Attachments: 1. Bid Tabulation Sheet 2. Milestone Network Proposal CITY Of WHEAl RIDGE BID lABULA110N !lIDiPRoPOSAL NO, RFP-07-04 BiD DUE DA~jj;--;:;iE 04/17/07 by 4:00 pm REQUES.ING DEPT./DNlSION 11 OpENED ll~ Linda Trimble, purchasing Agen' WITNESSED a~ - Julie pavel, purchasing Assistant ~ - PAGE-L--OF _{;b ~ ~ ~ PROJEC1: VOIP TELEPHONE SYS1EM ",ENDOR 1fli\,<\r.;\ 'e.c..,!\f'O)\o~'1 - N'j c~~~';(~$,;:;c:.0.;;:~~iJ'i';7":::" "~ \..bCATlbN ''Q.~s()Ji'i)e1'J!l1l\l.q ~GNAiUR€. PAG€. ~~ ACC€.PiS VISA t-! () - - QUALlFICAilONS <It ~)t~('\t.<\Ot. No "fA!'liIN IN6- ~eS i€.C\-INICAL APPROAC\-I '/~ V€.NDOR QU€.SiIONNAIR€' '1es - - ~ICE SC\-I€.DULE 'ies I!:L€.GAL ALI€.N F,?RM N () ~CKNOWL€.DGE ADE€.NDUM #1 N () ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM #2 N D J:\BID TA6ULA<lON S\-IEE<$\RFP.o7.04.dOC ~e;\ 'S~\- \ O~\- ":l'("\~(b-t- ~e0~n1\~~ ~~~;:: ".:,~.'~,,,~K,>i,.'-;.;);,.;';i,,{;-:t -'~ ". "je.s \ 'I e..s - ~O R 'l~ No 'ks 'i~ ~f2. "jes ~es ~ 'les ~.es ~f.S L~ 'itS ':kS 'j~ 'Its \ 'ks \ \.H ~\x'.l.rJ \ -:r.sc... ::ref<\ W\te.. ~ f\0l o..Q - Idi to, S ~ .. ,. ."., "les 'Jes ' 'les - '1es - ~ "'1e.s - '1es - les. 'ies '1.N(.om(>\e.\e. jes '1es. \ I CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BID ,TABULATION PROJECT: VOIP TELEPHONE SYSTEM OPENED BY -ft - Linda Trimble, purchasing Age~ 'v'~rrNESSED BY , Julie Pavel, purchasing Assistant :;::x ) PAGE.d.- OF.-B BIDIPHurOSAl NO. RFP-07-04 BID DUE DATElTIME 04117107 by 4:00 pm REQUESTING DEPT.lDlVISfON IT l.e: heros VENDOR I-ewo." f\-1to-,"h 1"e&\1"IO\o~'1 ,~~~,~, ' .. 1€~)~\})0"d. <;,;"o-1:X,"'--:~';;'-":'-'"' ,,~.,'~;:,"~. ,,' . LOCATION Descri:Ie1110N4l~~'(,:S1!>l'l!il1lSES"'" ' ~' ._-~,:.",,-,~.-" <>.-, ~e.s ies 'Yes. "/tS ' "1es ~~ 'Ies 'Yes ~e.,s ~e.s '!e,s "/e.s "'i-es Yes, 'Il\CO(l\p\<..~ '1es ~es ~e.s ~e.s. '/e.s SIGNATURE PAGE ACCEPTS VISA QUALIFICATIONS ~ f.)(~{,(('N:4 Ti\A-lN i.N& TECHNICAL APPROACH VENDOR QUESTIONNAIRE PRICE SCHEDULE ILLEGAL ALIEN FORM ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM #1 'ies - 'leS '1es - ~~S ~ts. 1es ~ 'jes - ~ "Ie::. ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENOUM #2 J:\BID TABULATION SHEETS\RFP.07-04.dOC , .s0C'1~_ '7es '/e9 "/e.s '/es '1es Yes 'Ie.:::. 'Ies '''/es 'fes , .;~....:~,:V'l-i': '_'i~"""~'}~~""" . '':.::. .~.;. : f ~ i Jr..j;: Quote Milestone Networks, Inc. 88 Inverness Circle East A212 Englewood, CO 80112 Sherry Jacobsen Main - (303) 468-6010 Fax - (303) 468-6011 info@milestonenetworks.com http://www.milestonenetworks.com Q-364 11111111111111111111111111111111111 Created 6/1/2007 Modified 611/2007 Valid for 30 Days Customer City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 U5 Shipping Address Same As Billing Address Contact PO: None Shipping: None Product Code Description Sell Qty Total 99997 Q-362 City Hall - w/3 year Support $174755.86 1 $174755.86 99997 Q-361 Public Works - w/3 year Support $20514.00 1 $20514.00 99997 Q-360 Anderson Complex - w/3 year Support $25131.31 1 $25131.31 99997 Q-359 Senior Center - w/3 year Support $17176.55 1 $17176.55 ---.-_._- -_._-~_.._._-- ------.---.-.-.-- 99997 Q-358 Recreation Center - w/3 year Support $33226.11 1 $33226.11 ~.--_._---- ------------ SUA1500RM2U APC Smart-UPS RM 1500VA USB & Serial - UPS (rack mountable) $699.00 11 $7689.00 FF420 4-Port V.34 Fax Server PSTN/PBX Model $1799.00 1 $1799.00 FF820 8-Port V.34 Fax Server PSTN/PBX Model $2999.00 1 $2999.00 USB1100 Premier Tech Music On Hold USB1100 $230.00 2 $460.00 91072 ShoreTel Analysis - 1st 2 sites & Project Report $1500.00 2 $3000.00 99996 Milestone Networks Installation, Integration, Configuration $32500.00 1 $32500.00 ..----.-..------ 99994 ShoreTel End User Training (24 students per class) per student $600,00 10 $6000.00 99997 5HORETEL OPTIONS: $0.00 0 $0,00 ---- .-....------------ 40003 ShoreTel Agent Call Manager $295.00 0 $0.00 40004 ShoreTel Supervisor Call Manager $595.00 0 $0,00 10246 ShoreTeJ Base, Audio & Web Conference SW with 12 ports $15600.00 0 $0.00 10248 ShoreTel Add-on, Audio & Web Conference SW (12 Ports) $13200.00 0 $0,00 Subtotal $325250,83 Page 1 Signature Total $325250.83 ATTACHMENT 2 ITEM NO: L ~ REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ~$"~ f;:t',~~_,."':~\,}.i ~ ItQ UII COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11,2007 TITLE: APPROVAL OF RFP-07-08 INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES TO INSURANCE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. (IMA) OF COLORADO ON A COMMISSION BASED AGREEMENT D PUBLIC HEARING IZI BIDSIMOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date: D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ) Quasi-Judicial: D Yes IZI No ~ot....:r'CP City Manat\r ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For our employee insurance benefits, the City contracts with a brokerage firm to provide the following services: review benefit contracts; solicit and negotiate rates for benefit plans in coordination with Human Resources; provide updated information and changes in regulations concerning benefits provided to public employees; evaluate and underwrite data for any changes in benefit plans; counsel, advise and make recommendations to the Administrative Services Department/Human Resources concerning various applicable issues; and, act as liaison to insurers when service problems occur. The contract with the current brokerage firm expires in 2007 therefore in accordance with policy the City initiated a Request for Proposal (RFP) process. Nine (9) brokerage firms submitted written proposals and after a careful screGning process, the final selection consisted of a panel interview with two (2) of the companies, Gallagher Benefit Services, as well as our current provider, Insurance Management Associates, Inc. (IMA). IMA has proven to be very innovative and has provided state-of-the art technologies in the area of insurance. Therefore, it is our recommendation to retain the broker services ofIMA with an effective date of August 17, 2007. On February 20, 2007, nine (9) proposals were received. All proposers met the initial bid requirements except Misken Benefits of Lake wood. Two firms were short listed and interviews were conducted. IMA of Colorado was ranked number one overall. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: None STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: None ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: IMA of Colorado will continue to receive commissions from the benefit insurance companies. It is estimated to be $65,000 based on commissions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to Award RFP-07-08 Insurance Broker Services to IMA of Colorado, Denver, CO on a commission based agreement, effective August 17, 2007." or, "I move to deny award ofRFP-07 -08 Insurance Broker Services for the following reason(s) " Report Prepared by: Reviewed by: Ruth Johnson, Human Resources Representative Karen Croom, Human Resources Manager Patrick Goff, Deputy City Manager Linda Trimble, Purchasing Agent Attachment: 1. Bid Tabulation Sheet 070611 RFP-07-08 Broker Services CAF.doc _M'~"-- ....,-".,.,,---- l"- I"- I ~." rl\Ol'l \ G,,\~"" \ "uf> -liW<.r ' """~ _ ;,0"""", ,""",,""'M: l',...."''''' """"",,,.,,I IW'''' '" Q,... ~\o; - ""!l"::- s'~~ r,.-.~",,-Yk\l ~ ~ . "'<"'" . '-"'" ,,,,.- ._-_..~~._.--_..~.. _.~.- -.-.-'-'--"" -,_.~.-._--_.._._~-"-~--- --_..~_._. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BID TABULATION PROJECT: INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES r"" . RFP.07 -08 - BID DUE Op.'T8TIME 02/20/07 by 4:00 pm REQUES'TING DEP,,/QIVISIDN HUMAN RESOURCES ~ -- ~ --- fVENbOR 1es \ '/es ~ 'Ies -1 ~:es \i-e.s ' \ ~es - \ ~-es \-~es \' - ~es ~ 'ks 'its ~e.S 'Jes ~. - - - - - \ ~~~ _ "1e51_ itS ~es \ 'i-es \ 'ies \ ~es 'ies -I -' -- 'Jes ~.e.<::, ~e..s ~-eS - - - ~es ~es '\e.s Nt> -- !:6CA1"\ON ~RII'TIO'" --GOODS I SERVICES_ SIGNATURE PAGE - - ~ \ QUAUFICA TIONS - ~-es - , EXPERIENCE TECHNICAL APPROACH REFERENCES & LOCATION ~CHEDU~ of RA~S - -- - ILLEGAL ALIEN FORM - ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM #'\ 1_ ~ ~ I o~EIIED BY - -t _ Linda Trimble, purcha~ WI'fIlESSED BY Julie pavel, purchasing Assistant \ PAGE....1-- D~ ~eS - 'Ies ......-" ~e.s ~ ~e.s ~es '/~ 'Ie..<::. ,- 'j~S ~es - \ 'Jes \ 'ies !nC.O'('('l~\(.. N o'\\-e... - ND'{\('.. '1es - - ~es -r - ~ ~ r L J:\BIO TABULATION S\1IOETSIRFI'-07-0B_dOC --~_.._-_.."....,...~..".....,.._......-. ,~,+---,-----"'-""'~-"-""~~-"-"'-" ._.._.._._...~ ,"...-"-...,,..........-....-- CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BID TABULATION PROJECT: INSURANCE BROKER SERVICES . BID/PROPOSAL NO. RFP.07.08 . BID DUE DA TEmME 02120/07 by 4:00 pm . REQUESTING DEPTJOIVISION HUMAN RESOURCES , OPENED BY . " J Linda Trimble, Purchasing Agenp- . W1TNESSE.D BY - Julie Pavel, Purchasing Assistant ~ PAGE A- OF d. VENDOR ~\ flood ~ ::r. \'i\ f>I cfr ~n,,/ Pe.~ ~ (c\c>ro.c.o LOCATION !2Ml"IIlOOc1 PI', Cc\\in'l \Jef\\let DESCRIPTION -Gooos I SERVICES v SIGNATURE PAGE '1es ~~ ~es , QUALIFICATIONS Yes. '~es 'J-es EXPERIENCE ~~ ~es Yes. TECHNICAL APPROACH 'Yes 'Jes Yes REFERENCES & LOCATION ~es. 'fes Yes SCHEDULE OF RATES 'fes. 'Jes Ve3 ILLEGAL ALIEN FORM 'Yes 1es "ks ACKNOWLEDGE ADDENDUM #1 ~e.s "'Jf,.<;, No J;IBID TABULATION SHEETSIRFP.07-08,doc ITEM NO: L 6, REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION '~c.", ,1 '(>"'W'''-- ~ " ' ;;~<i;~ "., -:.--- COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 nILE: RAHJ<ICATION OF Hi,)!' METRO MAYORS CAUCUS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING D PUBLIC HEARING IZI BIDS/MOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date: D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING ) Quasi-Judicial: D Yes IZI No ~ City Clerk CityM~~r~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Mayor DiTullio has asked for the Ratification of the Metro Mayors Memorandum of Understanding dated November 14, 2006, by and among the local governments (Attachment 1). This Memorandum of Understanding calls for municipalities to protect and enhance the quality of life in the metro area. Local Governments are in a unique position to provide consumer education and access to information and other resources which are crucial first steps in attaining the economic and environmental benefits of increased energy efficiency, as well as preserving and enhancing our quality of life. COMMISSIONIBOARD RECOMMENDATION: None STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: None ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to ratify the Metro Mayors Memorandum of Understanding dated November 14, 2006, by and among the local governments in the Denver Colorado metropolitan area and authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City." or: "I move to deny ratification of the Memorandum of Understanding." Report Prepared by; Janice Smdthers (303) 235-2815 Reviewed by: Michael Snow, City Clerk (303) 235-2823 Attachments: 1. Memorandum of Understanding ~ METRO MAYORS CAUCUS \VI '''-''''''' "";1'111'.'.'",.' III HI,",,,.,,,,, TIDS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING is made and entered into this 14 day ofNovemher 2006, by and among the local governments in the Denver Colorado metropolitan area, bodies politic organized under and existing by virtue of the laws of the State of Colorado. WHEREAS, the Metro Mayors Caucus has previously adopted strong policy resolutions calling for municipalities to protect and enhance the quality oflife in the metro area; and WHEREAS, energy efficiency and conservation provide measurable envirorunental benefits in the Conn of reduced pollutant emissions and decreased consumption off mite energy resources while offering the ~....v"_':'J for substantial cost savings to local governments, industry and taxpayers and creating high quality local jobs and boosting local economic development; and WHEREAS, through application of best practices and available technology, the United Slates can produce the same amount of gross domestic product as currently produced, using significantly less energy and without lowering our current quality oflife; and WHEREAS, the Metro Denver Economic Development Corporation identifies energy efficiency programs as an important opportunity for the Denver Metro Area to realize substantial economic and environmental benefits and to assume a national leadership position in the area of energy efficiency; and WHEREAS, in November 2004, Colorado's voters voiced solid support f(}r reducing Colorado's dependency on non.renewable energy sources by passing Amendment 37; and WHEREAS, local governments are in a unique position to provide conswner education and access to information and other resources which are crucial fll"St steps in attaining the economic and environmental benefits of increased energy efficiency, as well as preserving and enhancing our qualityoflife; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the undersigned mayors (hereinafter referred to as we) endorse and uphold the principles of stewardship and our fiduciary responsibilities. To further these principles, we intend to take voluntary actions, individually or collectively. Such actions may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. To Improve Our Municipal Operations.._ a. Assessing energy efficiency opportunities in municipal operations and in the community, setting energy efficiency targets and creating an action plan; b. Retrofitting municipal facilities with energy efficient technologies and urging employees to practice energy conservation; c. Purchasing Energy Star equipment and appliances for municipal use, and encouraging our citizens to do the same; d. Evaluating opportunities to increase pwnp efficiency in water and wastewater systems and recovering wastewater treatment methane for energy production; e. Recovering landfill methane for energy production; f. Increasing precycling and recycling rates in municipal operations and in the community; g. IncOIporating energy efficiency in municipal operations wherever feasible and cost effective, including but not limited to the following: (a) in the retrofit of existing buildings, include improvements in design, lighting, and heating/cooling systems; (b) replacement of traditional street lighting and traffic signals with more efficient light flXtures and traffic signal synchronization; (c) incorporation of energy efficiency features in new government buildings; h. Implementing alternatives wherever feasible and cost effective, that will reduce fuel consumption in municipal operations, including but not limited to the following: increasing average fuel economy of municipal fleet vehicles; launching an employee education program, including anti-idling messages; converting diesel vehicles to alternate fuels; and exploring early adoption of emerging technologies such as plug.in hybrids and alternatively fueled vehicles. 2. To Educote Our Citizens... a. Leading or assisting citizen, school, institutional, professional, business and industry educational campaigns about the benefits of energy efficiency and conservation; b. Facilitating dissemination of infonnation on the availability and cost.effectiveness of energy efficient products and services, and how businesses and individuals may participate in energy efficiency programs; c. Coordinating programs and services that connect individuals and businesses to energy efficiency resources at the national, state and local levels; d. Promoting alternative transportation options such as walking and cycling, and use of transit; 3. To CoUahoTllte with Others... a. Working with agencies such as the Regional Transportation District and the Denver Regional Council ofGovemments to promote commuter trip reduction programs, and incentives for car pooling and use of transit; b. Working with others to establish educational programs, websites and other methods for providing information on energy efficiency, pennit requirements, incentives, rebates and services; AI I ACHMENT 1 c. Encouraging government agencies, utilities, developers and others to implement programs that offer opportunities and incentives for the efficient use of energy, such as (a) efficient lighting, (b) energy-saving design and construction of new buildings and homes, (c) analysis and renovation of existing buildings and homes to optimize .....::w.__.w_ and reduce energy requirements, and (d) replacement on an as- needed basis of energy inefficient equipment and lighting; d. Encouraging utilities to establish rate structures and incentives that encourage energy efficiency; e. Working in cooperation with other jurisdictions to promote the concept of sustain ability in multi-jurisdictional projects and initiatives; 4. To Establish Programs and Policies... a. Making energy efficiency a priority within the community through building code improvements; b. Supporting the use ofwaste-t<H:Jlergy technology; c. Providing free or low-cost services, such as free lighting assessment or design assistance for individuals or small businesses; d. Promoting the use oflife-cycle cost analysis in development and landscaping practices, including mitigating market impediments; e. Promoting sustainable residential, commercial and industrial building practices using recognized standards and certification programs; f. Amending regulations, fee structures, permitting procedures and planning de\:isions to promote energy efficient technologies and standards; g. Supporting efforts to pass or strengthen legislation that (1) promotes energy efficiency and conservation, and (2) provides incentives for investment in efficient and clean energy technologies. Execution in Counterpilrts. This Agreement lOay be executed in countetpartS, each of which shall be effective and which together shall constitute one and the same instrument Signed. onN...,..-..:..:....~ 14,2006 Ken Fellman, Mayor of Arvada Edward J. Tauer, Mayor of Aurora Sue F. Horn, Mayor of Bennett Mark R. Ruzzin, Mayor of Boulder Richard D. Pilgrim. Mayor of Bow Mar Janice E. Pawlowski, Mayor of Brighton Karen Stuart, Mayor of Broomfield Randy Reed, Mayor of Castle Rock Randolph E. Pye, Mayor of Centennial Michael J. Wozniak, Mayor of Cherry Hills Village Sean Ford, Mayor of Commerce City (approved-not executed) Wade Carlson, Mayor ofDacono John W. Hickenlooper, Mayor of Denver Ronalda Goodner, Mayor ofEdgewater Olga Wolosyn. Mayor of Englewood (approved 1'101 execuled) Andrew J. Moore, Mayor of Erie Dale Sparks, Mayor of Federal Heights (approved not ex<<uted) Mike Simone, Mayor of Firestone Stephen J. Sullivan, Mayor ofFoxfield Eric E. Doering, Mayor of Frederick Lany Harte, Mayor of Glendale Charles J. Baroch, Mayor of Golden Nancy N. SbaJpe, Mayor of Greenwood Village Christopher J. Berry, Mayor of Lafayette Stephen A. Burkholder, Mayor ofLakewood James A Taylor, Mayor of Littleton JohnR. O'Boyle, Jr., Mayor of Lone Tree Julia Pirnack, Mayor ofLongmont (approved-nor executed) Charles L. Sisko Mayor of Louisville Allen Williams, Mayor of Morrison (approved - not executed) Kathleen M. Novak, MayorofNortbglenn David Casiano, Mayor ofparker Mary L. Carter, Mayor of Sheridan Andrew Muckle, Mayor of Superior Noel I. Busck, Mayor ofThomton Nancy McNally, Mayor of Westminster Jerry DiTullio, Mayor of Wheat Ridge (approved-not executed) 2 ITEM NO: 2, REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION tt"."'-~,. "," . ..~, : '-",,:"-.., ':~-",.',.. ~:/ ,<)5- .,..,,~ COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11,2007 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL 06-2007, AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE- ENACTING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO SIGN CODE IZI PUBLIC HEARING D BIDS/MOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date: May 14, 2007) IZI ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING Quasi-Judicial: D IZI Yes No A dJIL Community Development Director City~~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:. The existing sign code was adopted as a part of the overall zoning code rewrite in 200 I. The Community Development Department has been working on revisions to the sign code since 2003. Attached is the ordinance repealing and re-enacting Article VII of Chapter 26. The maior changes proposed are: 1. Incorporation of charts for the Residential, Agriculture and Public Facilities Districts and Commercial, Industrial and Mixed Use districts to be more "user friendly". The charts include provisions for permitted signs, prohibited signs, signs exempt from permitting and specifications for size, height, number and setbacks. 2. Definitions have been added or modified. 3. New categories have been added including "rooms for rent" signs, menu reader board signs, canopy signs and changeable copy signs. 4. Other categories have been modified including the reduction of the amount of door and window signs allowed, reduction of setbacks for portable signs and projecting signs and modification of banner allowances. 5. Performance standards have been added which deal with lighting, sight distance and maintenance of signs. Adoption of this ordinance implements Council's goal of creating a strong partnership with the community. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDA nON: The Planning Commission's public hearings on this ordinance occurred on October 7, 2004 and January 20,2005. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Please note that the ordinance has been prepared to repeal and re-enact Article VII, Sections 26-701 through 26-710. This does not lend to doing bold and strike-throughs to show the changes. Changes proposed are designated with red-colored typeface. The changes proposed are intended to provide more flexibility for business owners while protecting the visual appearance of the City's commercial areas. Provisions have been included to negate impacts to adjacent residential properties. At the last study session with City Council on this topic (April 2, 2007), consensus was given on the following items: 1. Increasing the time allowance for inflatables from one 30-day period (or two IS-day periods) to one 60-day period (or two 30-day periods or four IS-day periods). 2. Keeping the existing regulations relative to non-conforming signs as amended by City Council last year. Another item of concern which was not addressed at the study session is the issue of portable signs. Under current regulations, a multi-tenant building can have a maximum oftwo portable signs set out near the street. This means that if there are more than two tenants in a building, the first two tenants to receive permits would meet the maximum. Business owners who cannot be issued sign permits for portables have complained that this regulation is inequitable. However, staffhas concern about how loosening this standard would visually impact our commercial corridors. Staff has also included a provision that lighted signs be turned off one hour after the business which they are advertising is closed. The allowance for Master Sign Plans has been included back in the legislation. Subsequent to the first reading, written correspondence was submitted by Torn Abbott with commentary on the proposed regulations. Staff has the following comments relative to his correspondence. 1. The sign code does not prohibit someone from displaying "art" on their business property, Murals are also allowed so long as they do not directly advertise the business in the building where they are painted. The mural on the west side ofthe Valente's Restaurant building is not considered a sign as it depicts an Italian countryside scene, not a restaurant serving Italian cuisine. 2 2. Icon type signage is permitted but the square footage is counted toward the sign square footage allowances. 3. The current regulations for banners is vague as to when they can be put up and for how long they can be had. Banners have been addressed per staff s recommendation that each business is allowed one at any time. The size permitted is one-half of the wall signage allowance. 4. Home occupation signs are proposed to be permitted on arterial streets in the city. 5, Either moving signs can be allowed or not at all. Selective allowances for moving or flashing signs would be hard to administer and enforce. 6. Most city-sponsored signage is related to traffic control. Staff concludes that Public Works has rationale for the need for traffic control signage relating to the health, safety and welfare of the traveling public. An open house regarding the sign code was held on June 5, 2007. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: 1. Do not approve the proposed legislation. 2. ModifY existing proposed legislation. ,FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact to the City as a result of adopting this ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Council Bill 02-2007 on second reading, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication." Or, "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill 02-2007, and thereby deny Case No. ZOA-03-18, an ordinance amending Chapter 26 concerning the development review process." Report Prepared by: Meredith Reckert Reviewed by: Alan White Attachments: L Council Bill 06-2007 2. October 7, 2004 Planning Commission minutes 3. January 20,2005 Planning Commission minutes 4. Abbott letter dated April 1 , 2007 3 -INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHULZ Council Bill No. 06-2007 Ordinance No. Series of 2007 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING ARTICLE VII OF CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TO SIGN CODE WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted regulations pertaining to the regulation of signs; WHEREAS, the City has identified changes which will improve the readability and understanding of the sign code; WHEREAS, commercial signage is prominently displayed along the city's most traveled streets; WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge is concerned about the negative affects of exterior lighting and its affects on adjacent properties; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Article VII of Chapter 26, Sections 26-701 through 26-710, of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws is hereby repealed and reenacted as follows: Section 26-701. Intent and purpose. The intent and purpose of this article is: A. To protect the public from signs which are structurally unsafe; B. To promote traffic safety and the free movement of traffic, and protect the public from the hazardous conditions which result from signs that obscure or distract the vision of motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians; C. To facilitate easy, safe and pleasant communication between people and their surroundings; D. To conserve the character and economic value of buildings and neighborhoods; ATTACHMENT 1 1 E. To provide a balance between legitimate identification and advertising needs and the visual discord which signs sometimes cause, and to provide a sense of balance or proportion between a sign and the building or property which it serves; F. To encourage the erection of signs which are legible in their surroundings, compatible with the visual character of the surrounding area, appropriate to the activities identified; and G. To ensure that adequate and effective advertising signage opportunities exist within a regulatory framework which protects the constitutionally guaranteed right of free speech. H. It is not the intent ofthese regulations to prohibit or unreasonably regulate or to require permits for the legitimate display of traditional holiday season decorations; provided, however, that such decorations or displays are installed and maintained in a safe manner. Section 26-702. Definitions. For the purposes ofthis article, the following words and phrases shall have the meanings respectively ascribed to them by this section: Animated sign. A sign or parts thereof, which revolve, whirl, twirl or utilize motion, implied or actual, in a horizontal or vertical plane or both. The only animated type of signs that are permitted are "barber pole" signs. Arcade sign. Any sign projecting beneath and attached to the underside of any balcony, canopy, awning or other structural overhang or passageway. Artistic mural or sculpture. A freestanding statue or sculpture or a graphic illustration or design, or an architectural design or relief applied directly to or incorporated within a wall of a building, which does not advertise or promote a particular business, service or "branded" product. Awning. A movable shelter supported entirely from the exterior wall of a building and/or a type which can be retracted against the face of the supporting building. Banner. A sign or advertising display constructed of cloth, canvas, fabric or other light material that is mounted with no enclosing framework intended to be displayed for a short period oftime. Billboard. Any sign in excess of fifty (50) square feet in size oriented to the interstate highway utilized to advertise a product or service that is not produced or conducted on the same property as the sign. 2 Building front. The exterior walles) of a building facing a public street or streets or other public right-of-way other than alleys, or one (1) exterior wall containing the primary entrance to the building if not directly facing upon a public street. Canopy. A roof-like structure serving the purpose of protecting vehicles and/or pedestrians and which may be freestanding or attached to a building, is provided with supports, and is open on three (3) sides if attached and on all sides if freestanding. Changeable copy sign. A sign, either illuminated or nonilluminated, which is designed so that the message or any part of the message may be periodically changed, either mechanically or electronically, however, where a change in message occurs no sooner than every fifteen (15) seconds. Development. A single lot, parcel or tract ofland or portions or combinations of lots, parcels or tracts ofland which are held in single or common ownership and which exist as a distinct functional entity. Multi-use and multi-tenant buildings and multiple building complexes which are held in singular or common ownership, either by individual, corporation, partnership or other legally recognized entity, shall be considered a "development" for the purpose of signage. Erect. To build, construct, attach, hang, place, suspend, affix, relocate or reconstruct any sign or sign-supporting structure, Flashing sign: A sign that is illuminated with intermittent lighting, animated lighting or with varying intensities of light at intervals of fifteen (15) seconds or less, including a moving light or lights. Freestanding sign. A sign that is permanent and self-supporting, being nondependent on support from a building or other structure, including signs placed upon fences or nonsupporting walls. Illuminated sign. A sign that is illuminated with constant intensities of light of a non-varying nature. There are three (3) types of illuminated lights as follows: (a) Direct. Lighting by means of an unshielded light source which is effectively visible as a part of the sign. Neon lighting is considered direct lighting. (b) Indirect. Lighting which illuminates the front of a sign or the entire building facade upon which the sign is displayed, the source of the light being shielded from public view and from surrounding properties. Indirect illumination does not include lighting which is primarily used for purposes other than sign illumination, such as parking lot lighting. (c) Internal. Lighting by means of a light source which is within a sign having a translucent background and which silhouettes opaque letters or designs, or lighting within 3 or behind letters or designs which are themselves made of translucent or opaque material. Informational sign. A freestanding or wall-type sign, not located within public street right-of-way, which gives necessary direction or non-advertising information to motor vehicle operators or pedestrians, such as entrance, exit, parking limitations or location of onsite buildings or facilities. A company logo or name no larger than one (1) square foot may be included on each such permitted sign. Lot. A tract, building site, parcel or portion of land separated from other parcels or portions by description, as on a subdivision plat of record or survey map or by metes and bounds, for the purpose of sale, lease or use. Major interior drive. A drive aisle located on private property which connects two (2) public streets or provides access to two (2) or more parcels ofland or developments. Nonconforming sign. A sign which does not conform with the regulations set forth in this article, but which did meet the requirements of the regulations existing at the date of its erection. Off-premises sign. Any sign, fifty (50) square feet or smaller, which advertises or directs attention to a business, commodity, service or activity conducted, sold or offered elsewhere other than on the property which the sign is located. Public and semi-public signs are not considered off-premises signs. Painted sign. A sign that is painted directly onto the exterior surface of a building, wall or structure. Political sign. A noncommercial sign, which is exempt from permit requirements, erected or placed so as to advertise, announce, declare or state a political message, whether relating to a political campaign or election or any other issue of public concern which is protected by the First Amendment right of free speech. Portable sign. Any sign which is supported by one (1) or more uprights or braces upon the ground and which is of portable design. Projecting sign. A sign which is affixed to any building, wall or structure and which extends beyond the building wall more than fifteen (15) inches. Public sign, A sign that is required by federal, state or local law or ordinance necessary for public information. Revolving sign. A sign utilizing an axis point to pivot the sign surface. Roof sign. A sign erected, constructed and maintained above the eaves and attached to the roof of a building. 4 Semipublic sign. A sign giving information as to church location, educational institutions or service club locations. Sign. Any object or device or part thereof situated outdoors or indoors, viewed from outdoors by the general public, and which object or device or the effect produced thereby is used to advertise, announce, identify, declare, demonstrate, display, instruct, direct or attract attention by means including, but not limited to, words, letters, figures, designs, fixtures, colors, motion, illumination, sound or projecting images. Sign permit. A building permit issued for the erection, construction, enlargement, alteration, repair, relocation, improvement, removal, conversion or demolition of any sign issued pursuant to the building code of the city or this sign code. Sign structure. Any supports, uprights, braces or framework of a sign which does not include any portion of the sign message. Street frontage. For the purpose of signage, frontage upon a street is obtained by ownership, easement or leasehold only ifused for vehicular access to the property, or if not used for vehicular access, only if such street frontage is at least fifty (50) feet in width. Where the regulations allow "one sign per street frontage," the intent is that the sign allowed is placed upon or facing the street, unless specifically otherwise permitted. Surface area of sign. The total area enclosed by the shortest line that can be drawn around the entire sign, including any architectural embellislunent or background material or color forming an integral part of the display and used to differentiate the sign from its surroundings. Sign support structures which do not bear advertising material shall be excluded in computation of sign area. Signs without backing (i.e., freestanding, projecting, A-frame or pedestal signs) are allowed the maximum square footage for each side for double-faced signs; however, signs having more than two (2) sides or faces shall not exceed the total face area allowed for a double-faced sign. Temporary sign. Any sign, banner, pennant, valance or other outdoor advertising sign constructed oflight fabric, cardboard, wallboard, plywood, sheet metal, paper or other light materials, with or without a frame, intended or designed to be displayed for a limited period of time. Traffic and regulatory signs. Signs, signals or markings placed or erected by federal, state or local authority for the purpose of regulating, waming or guiding traffic. Unlawful sign. Any sign or outdoor advertising device erected in the absence of a permit required by this article, or in violation of any of the limitations, prohibitions or requirements of this article. Unsafe sign. Any sign or advertising structure found unsafe or insecure or creating a hazard or menace to the public safety, health and welfare. 5 Wall sign. A sign constructed of durable materials or painted and which is permanently affixed to an exterior surface of any building, wall or structure and which does not extend more than fifteen (15) inches beyond the building wall, except that signage placed upon marquees, canopies or awnings shall be considered as wall signs. Section 26-703. Enforcement and penalties. Enforcement and penalties shall be in accordance with those provisions set forth in article X. In addition to any remedies set forth in section 26-1004 et seq., specific authority is granted to the enforcement officer to remove, or have removed, the following signs after posting of a notice at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to removal upon the premises where such sign(s) is located: A. Signs which are prohibited pursuant to the residential/agriculture/public facilities and commercial/industrial/mixed use sign standard charts. B. Unsafe signs. Section 26-704. Contractor's license required. A. No person shall engage in the business of installing, altering or repairing any sign within the corporate limits of the city unless he is the holder of a currently valid, city sign contractor's license, except for those signs exempt from permit. B. The city shall have the power to suspend or revoke the license of any holder of a sign license issued pursuant to this article, in accordance with the provisions as set forth in the building code. (See chapter 5 of this Code of Laws for related provisions.) Section 26-705. Permit required. A. No sign or modification to an existing sign shall be erected, placed or displayed outdoors within the city limits until a permit for such sign has been issued by the city, unless such sign is exempt from a permit in accordance with this sign code. B. An application, accompanied by a " to scale" drawing, for each separate sign permit shall be made to the department of community development on a form supplied by the department. Such applications shall set forth the name and address of the applicant; the location where such sign is to be erected or located; the name, phone number and address ofthe owner of the property; the size, height, type and general description of such proposed sign, including the materials of which it is constructed, the sign contractor's name, phone number and address and such other pertinent information required or deemed necessary by the department to determine the sign's safety and conformance to this article. A "to scale" plot plan of the lot or parcel shall accompany the application and shall show the location of the proposed sign and the location, type and size of other signs which exist upon the lot. The mere application for a sign permit does 6 not assure that a permit will be issued; therefore, it is advised that signs not be fabricated, constructed or purchased prior to issuance of a sign permit. C. Fees for the erection of signs shall be established and set forth in Appendix A. Permit fees and city use tax will be waived where a nonconforming sign is removed and replaced by a sign conforming with these regulations. Section 26-706. Non-conforming signs. A. Nonconforming signs. A lawful sign existing on the effective date of the ordinance from which this article is derived may be continued, although such sign does not conform to the provisions of this article, subject to the following provisions: 1. Relocation, or replacement of a nonconforming sign is not permitted unless such sign is brought into conformance with this article. Enlargement or extension of a nonconforming sign is permitted so long as the nonconformity is not increased. Rebuilding or reconstructing a nonconforming sign is permitted only if the rebuilding or reconstruction is limited to installing a new sign cabinet on an existing support structure. Installing a new sign cabinet together with a new support structure shall constitute replacement of the nonconforming sign and shall require conformance with this article. 2. In the event the use of a nonconforming sign is discontinued for a period of sixty (60) consecutive days, the nonconforming sign shall thereafter conform to the provisions of the zoning district in which it is located or be removed. For the purpose of this section, the term "discontinued" shall apply to uses which customarily operate on a continuous basis versus a seasonal basis. Seasonal uses shall be subject to a twelve-month period of nonuse prior to requiring full compliance with these regulations. 3. A nonconforming sign that is destroyed or damaged more than fifty (50) percent of its net worth due to natural causes may not be reconstructed except in accordance with the provisions of this article; however, any sign destroyed or damaged to any extent by vandalism may be rebuilt to its original state within six (6) months or otherwise it must be reconstructed in conformance with this article. 4. Normal maintenance which does not require modification of the sign structure, supports or members shall be permitted. A face change is considered normal maintenance. 5. In order to provide an incentive for removal of nonconforming signs, permit fees and city use tax will be waived where a nonconforming sign is removed and replaced by a sign conforming with these regulations. B. Discontinued business, etc. Whenever a use ofland and/or building using an identification sign is discontinued, except for seasonal uses pursuant to subsection A.2., above, the sign shall be removed or obscured by the person owning the property within thirty (30) days after the discontinuance of such use. Any such sign which is 7 nonconforming to these regulations and which is not used to advertise an active business within sixty (60) days of discontinuance shall be removed or otherwise brought into compliance. Section. 26-707. General provisions/performance standards. A. Sight distance triangle 1. No sign is allowed which would violate the sight distance triangle requirements of section 26-603B. 2. At signalized intersections, where both streets are collectors and/or arterial, the required sight distance shall be governed by the standards set forth in the most current edition of the policy on geometric design of highways and streets, published by the American Association State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). B. Location of signs I. All signs allowed by this article, except billboards, public signs, and semipublic signs shall be located on the lot which they advertise. C. Streets and rights-of-way 1. No sign shall be erected in such a location as to interfere with motor vehicle or pedestrian traffic. 2. No sign is allowed in the public right-of-way, with the exception of signs on bus benches and shelters pursuant to article IV of chapter 21, and public, semi-public, traffic and regulatory signs. 3. No sign is allowed which may be construed as a traffic sign or signal or which may be confusing to motorists or mistaken as a traffic signal. 4. Where it is difficult to determine the pubic right-of-way boundary due to lack of curb, gutter and/or sidewalk, or survey markers, such boundaries shall be presumed to be ten (10) feet from the edge of pavement or back of curb. Where a sidewalk exists, such boundaries shall be presumed to be two (2) feet from outside edge of sidewalk. 5. Attachment of any sign to utility poles or other poles or structures within public right-of-way is prohibited, except as approved by City Council pursuant to this article. 6. Temporary signs found by an enforcement officer to be located within city right-of-way or in violation of sight triangle requirements shall be removed by such enforcement officer with no requirement of notice. 8 D. Interference 1. No sign is allowed which employs a lighting or control mechanism which causes radio, radar, cellular telephone or television ink":","uce. 2. No sign is allowed which, even though in general conformance with the standards and requirements of this sign code, is judged by the chief of police and public works director as a dangerous sign due to interference with a traffic control device by being in direct line between the control device and oncoming traffic or otherwise in visual competition with a traffic control device. E. Compliance with building codes 1. No sign shall be erected, constructed or maintained which obstructs or is attached to any fire escape, window, door or opening used as a means of egress or ingress or for frrefighting purposes, or is placed which interferes with any opening required for light or ventilation. 2. No sign is permitted which is structurally unsafe as determined by the chief building official, based upon criteria established in the adopted building codes. 3. The design of all sign structure members and foundation shall conform to the requirements of the building code relative to allowable stresses, materials and engineering standards. Loads, both vertical and horizontal, shall not produce stresses exceeding those specified in the building code, and material construction shall be ofthe quality and grade required by the building code. All signs and structures shall be designed and constructed to meet the adopted building and electrical codes. F. Outside display 1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 26-631, any merchandise dis- played outside of a building in such a way as to attract attention when viewed by the general public by placement upon a pole, a fence, a platform, roof or other similar device or structure shall be considered a sign and is prohibited. This shall not, however, be construed to prohibit merchandise customarily stored outside of buildings and placed upon shelves or tables, such as automobiles, campers, boats, plant materials, produce or lumber. G. Illumination 1. All illuminated signage shall comply with Section 26-503 of the zoning and development code. 2. Signs within one hundred (100) feet of a residential structure, may be lighted indirectly or internally. 9 3. Signs over one hundred (100) feet from a residential structure, may use any type oflighting source, except search or flashing lights, provided that they are shaded, shielded or directed so that the light shall not adversely affect surrounding premises or interfere with safe vision on public or private roadways, including highways. 4. All direct and indirect lighting sources shall be downcast to reduce glare, skyglow and light pollution. 5. Internally lighted signs with white or light-colored backgrounds, with or without sign copy are prohibited, 6. All lighted signs shall be turned off one-hour after the business which they are advertising is closed. H. Maintenance 1. Any sign, including temporary signs, that becomes discolored, ragged, shredded, detached, etc., shall be removed or repaired. J. Removal or reconstruction of dangerous signs. 1. All signs which are prohibited shall conform to the provisions of this article either by removal or reconstruction, whichever applies, within sixty (60) days after the owner of such sign is notified of the violation. Section 26-708. Miscellaneous provisions. A. Building addresses 1. House or building address number signs shall be consistent with Section 26-419 C. - E. of the zoning and development code. B. Signs located on bus benches and bus stop shelters. 1. Signs located on bus benches shall be in conformance with Code of Laws, Article IV, Section 21-124. 2. Signs located on a bus stop shelter shall be in conformance with Code of Laws, Article IV, Section 21-151. Such signs shall be limited to two (2) faces per shelter for commercial advertising purposes with a maximum of twenty-four (24) square feet per face. C. Freestanding signs - Commercial, Industrial and Mixed Use zone districts 10 1. Where two (2) freestanding signs are permitted by virtue of multiple street frontage, each permitted sign shall be allowed to have the maximum square footage allowed based on the formulas shown in Section 26-708.C.5. In addition, the sign area allowed may be transferred from one (1) sign to another; provided, that no freestanding sign shall exceed four hundred (400) square feet in area. 2. Where multiple signs are permitted because of multiple street frontage, the signs may be erected on the same street frontage. 3. For double-faced signs, each sign face can have the maximum square footage allowed. 4. Landscaping requirement: For new development or total redevelopment, all freestanding signs shall be placed within landscaped areas. 5. Maximum sign area: Based upon the following table: Maximum Sign Area (Square Feet = s.f.)* TABLE INSET: Floor Area of Building Single Use Development Multiple Use Development 0--1,500 s.f. 35 s.f. 60 s.f. 1,501--5,000 s.f. 35 s.f. plus 1 s.f. per each additional 50 s.f. of floor area over 1,501. 60 s.f. plus 1 s.f. per each additional 40 s.f. of floor area over 1,501. 5,001--50,000 s.f. 100 s.f. plus 1 s.f. per each additional 500 s.f. of floor area over 5,001. 50 s.f. of 150 s.f. plus 1 s.f. per each 300 s.f. of floor area over 5,001. Over 50,001 s.f. 190 s.f. plus 1 s.f. per each additional I ,000 s.f. of floor area over 50,001 up to a maximum size of 300 s.f. 300 s.f. plus 1 s.f. per each additional 1 ,000 s.f. of floor area over 50,001 up to a maximum size of 400 s.f. 11 *In computing allowable sign size, only the footprint of the structure can be used. The floor area of gas station and drive-thru canopies cannot be applied toward the freestanding sign allowance. D. districts Freestanding signs - Residential, Agriculture and Public Facilities zone 1. Where two (2) freestanding signs are permitted by virtue of multiple street frontage, each permitted sign shall be allowed to have the maximum square footage allowed, as defined in Section 26-708.C.5. 2. Where multiple signs are permitted because of multiple street frontage, the signs may be erected on the same street frontage. 3. For double-faced signs, each sign face can have the maximum square footage allowed. 4. Landscaping requirement: For new development or total redevelopment, all freestanding signs shall be placed within landscaped areas. E. Master Sign Plan 1. The planning commission may approve a master sign plan for any existing or proposed commercial or industrial development of at least two (2) acres or more in size which is under unified control either by ownership, legal association or leasehold. 2. The intent and purpose is to encourage well-planned and designed signage within a large multiple building or multiple use complex which expresses unification and integration by elements of architectural style, size, color, placement and lighting while at the same time allowing for reasonable individual business identification. An additional purpose is to encourage the elimination of existing nonconforming signs. The planning commission may grant as a bonus for well-designed plans additional signs and/or up to a fifty (50) percent increase in maximum square footage for each sign, and/or may permit signs in locations other than normally permitted, based upon a finding that the proposed master sign plan substantially meets the intent and purpose of this subsection relating to unification and integration of signage. 3. Once approved at a public hearing by planning commission, all master sign plans shall be recorded with the Jefferson County Recorder's office and shall constitute a covenant and must be complied with by all owners, proprietors, lessees or assigns, whether current or future. No substantial variation from the plan shall be permitted without planning commission approval. Noticing requirements for a master sign plan process shall follow the procedures outlined in Section 26-109. 12 Section 26-709. Residential, Agricnlture and Pnblic Facilities zone districts sign standards chart. SEE CHART NO.1 Section 26-710. Commercial, Industrial and Mixed Use zone districts sign standards chart. SEE CHART NO.2 Section 2. Safetv Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare ofthe public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 3. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 4. Suoersession Clause. If any provision, requirements or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge, which are in existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards here shall supersede and prevail. Section 5. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to o in this 14th day of May ,2007, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for June 11 .2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to . this day of . 2007, 13 SIGNED by the Mayor on this ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk 1ST bl' . pu lcatlOn: May 17. 2007 2nd publication: ' Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: day of JERRY DITULLIO, MAYOR ,2007. APPROVED AS TO FORM BY CITY ATTORNEY GERAJDDAHL, CITY ATTORNEY 14 CHART 1 I Section 26.709 *Note: Sections with recommended changes are shaded in red. TABLE 1. SIGN STANDAIWS li'; ;:U:;illENTIAL, AGRICULTURAL, AND PUBLIC FACILITIES ZONES (R-l, R-IA, R-lB, R-IC, '1.-2, R-2A, R-J R-3A, A-I, A ~,PF) TYPE OF SIGN ALWWED .. PERMIT> l\1A,XIM:Ul\i !lIZE AND REQUIRED HEIGHT PER SIGN 1. Animated 2, Arcade 3. Canopy 4. Changeable Copy S. Freestanding 6. Off-Premises Signs 7, Portable 8. Projecting MAXIMUM' NUMBER MINIMUM SETBACK OTHER REQUIREMENTS No NO No Yes Yes Maximum of 32 square feet per sign. Maximum beight 7 feet for all residential zones. Yes Yes ~{mdamm sign area is 2 SllHBf6 feet fer sash 1,Q9(j SE(HaFfl feet af Iel-a<ea. Maximum of32 square feet per sign. ~4"J:mi'R'lllm. Rei~t in R I, R l!~. ~~ ~~. ~_ ~~,:?_ ~, D_ ~.'\;- A 1 ana LA.. :2 ElistFiets, €: feet. Mfui'~-CW:':t'''. :'.~':sfft ::-. ~. ~, "? :;\; llBd PRD diolfiets, '.vithout eemmereial uses, 12 feet M.,dfllllffi haigbt in PIW distFie~ \'tith eemmereialases and far sSffiffisfeialases anly, 2j' feet. Maximum height 7 feet for all residential zones. No Yes Yes 6 square feet per side per sign. No Residenlial/AgriculluraJ/PF Zones Sign Chart 1 per street frontage, but no more than 2 par development 1 per street frontage I per street frontage, but no more than 2 per development. 5 feet from any property line ~5 feet from any property line Must be setback a minimum of +G-feet: 5 feet from any street right-of-way line if""", 36 inches or 2 feet iflHl<lef 36 inches or less in height. The time lapse between the change in information shall not be less than 15 seconds. Not permitted for residential uses. Not permitted for single family and two- family dwellings. Permitted only for public and semi-public signs and biiiboards. Not permitted for single family and two-family dwellings. A-frame or pedestal s~le only. Must be anchored to the ground or weighted sufficiently to prevent movement by wind. Must only be displayed during normal hours of operation. May be located on a sidewalk provided that adequate clearance exists to meet ADA requirements. Must be displayed only on the premise being advertised. 1 TYPE OF SIGN 9. Public and Semi- Public Signs 10. Residential Subdivision Identification Signs 11. Temporary Subcatel!ories: a. Bal/oons or other Yes inflatable devices b. Banners Yes ALLOWED PERMIT MAXIMUM SIZE AND REQUIRED, HEIGHT PER SIGN Yes 6 square feet per sign Yes Yes Yes Not to exceed 20 square feet in area or 6 feet in height. Yes Balloons and reqnired tethers cannot exceed a height of 35' measured from existing grade. No Total size for any single or combined banners affIxed to a wall based on one half (112) the allowance for wall signs. If am",. ta roRse, s~e is the same as if it ...~_ ~......~~1.._..l .._ ..1._ _____A.. aajaeeRt 'sailElieg '::all11a~:e street HeRtag.. Residential/Agricultural/PF Zones Sign Chart MAXIMUM NUMBER MINIMUM .sETBACK 2 per organization or attraction To be determined by the Community Development Director 1 per street frontage Monument-type signs must be set back on the property a minimum of 10 feet, unless incorporated into a traffic island entrance, then 25 feet back from face of street curb and 3 feet from edge of traffic island. 1 time per year None for up to ;j() 60 days, or 2 times per year for up to # 30 days each time, or 4 times per year for up to 15 days each time. 1 per use per N/ A activity OTHER REQUIREMENTS May be located off-premises with approval of property owner and Community Development Director. May be located in r~o~w with approval of Public Works Director. Monument, fence, or wall-incorporated only. Fence or wall incorporated type signs may be placed parallel with and at property line following the same height and sight distance requirements as for a wall or fence. Not permitted for single family and two- family dwellings. Permitted only to advertise special events and sales. Shall be securely anchored or attached so as to prevent ,.t;<;<I......."'..;....."l, entanglement or encr...."'...J..,....""lt onto adjacent properties or public streets, or undue hazard to motorists or pedestrians. Roof-mounting is permitted. Not permitted for single family and two- family dwellings. Pe""ill.. en!:>'le ......ftis. sr.oial eveRt, .... sales. Shall be securely anchored or attached so as to prevent dislocation, entanglement or encro"'...'h...."...~ onto adjacent properties or public streets, or undue hazard to motorists or pedestrians. May be plaoed upon a building wall but shall not be attached to fencing, landscaping, freestanding posts or utility poles. Banners may be placed 2 MAXIMUM NUMBER MINIMUM SETBACK O:fHERREQUIREMENTS only on walls facing a public street or major interior drive. TYPE OF bIGN "..... ALLOWEDI'E\.l.MIT MAXIMUM SIZE AND REQUIRED HEIGHT PER SIGN c. Construction Signs Yes No Shall not exceed 32 square feet. Shall not exceed &-feel 7 feet in height. TemfleFar/ signs as pemiUed unGer seetien 2€ ,09 L. Shall not be illuminated. Must be located on the property where active construction work is oeeuring. 1 per street 5 feet frontage allowed between the time a building permit is issued and a certificate of occupancy is obtained or any number of signs which are necessary for safety on the premises. d. Pennants, streamers Yes and similar devices Ves None e. Real ;;'.s~ate Signs Yes No 9 square feet for one and two~ family dwelling residential uses, 50 square feet for maltifomily all other uses. f Temporary Model Yes Home Signs Yes Not to exceed 12 square feet each. Not over 6-feel 7 feet in height if a freestanding type. Not permitted for single family and two- family dwellings. Permitted only to advertise special events and sales. Shall be securely anchored or attaChed so as to prevent dislocation, entanglement, or encroachment onto adjacent properties or public streets, or undue hazard to motorists or pedestrians. 1 time per year None for up to W60 days, or 2 times per year for up to ~ 30 days each time, or 4 times per year for up to 15 days each time. 1 per street frontage allowed 5 feet 1 per model home 5 feet Shall not be illuminated. Must be located on the property being advertised. 1 per street front or major interior drive per activity N/A Not permitted for single family and two- family dwellings. For uses which have a rear entry 01' delivery door, 1 noniUuminated wan sign per use. 12, Wall or Painted Yes No larger than 1 square foot for every linear foot of the side of the building to which it is affixed. Signs affIxed to _elled or detasheel eaasflies and marquees or awnings shall be considered wall signs and shall be calculated based upon the length of the wall Yes ResidentiallAgriculturallPF Zones Sign Chart 3 'TYPE OF SIGN ----', ..;;",;, 13. Miscellaneous - ~--... tl. Artisle Murals or Yes Sculptures ALLOWE.D PERMIT 'MAXIMUM SIZE AND ,REQU1JU;D HEIGHT PER SIGN < - io"Wiilch they are attached or adjacent to, For buildings with flat roofs, wall signs shall not extend above the top of parapet or mansard, and ifplaced upon a parapet or mansard, shall not extend more than 3 feet above the deck line. ". MAXIMUM:, tINIMUM.i~tT. H~...~ REQUIREMEN~...." < " ,NUMBER. ... SETBACK...., '..,. ,.... .... ~'~ -'- ...;,2.. None ..~ NQlimit None b. Barber Shop Pale:; No c, Flags (city, state, Yes national only), placards, """- badges, insignias, or similar devices of any governmental agency Or civic, charitable, religiOUS, patriotic, politica/' fraternal or similar nonprofit organization. d. Flashing Signs and No Search Lights e. Historic plaques, Yes cornerstones, erected by the city ar historical agencies designating an area ar property of local historical importance f. Home OCcU[JI1Iion- Yes, as Yes Signs Jaccessory to I No "- - - No - -, Flagpole cannot exceed 35 reet None in height. Flagpole must meet setback requirements of the Zone district in which they are constructed. -. No Shall'not exceed 3 square reet in size. None ~ None -IMaximum or2 square reet in size. /1 per home Occupation ., ~"- - -J ShaH not advertise or promote a particular business, service or "branded". prodUct. A . company, firm, aSSOciation, society, etc., logo is not considered within the scope of t~is definition and is considered a sign. - - -- AllOwed when located on their own premises or displayed along any march or parade route or in sockets along any street doring a fund. raising drive or other similar special event Any such devices to be placed within public right-or-way may only be approved by city council. - ~able proVided that suct; designations are in accordance with article IX of the Zoning and Development Code. ReSidentiallAgricu/turallPF Zones Sign Chart -. ,- - tanding - May be freestanding or wall mounted. _ ,Allowed only on properties located on arterial ., "1\\'I~#\Jr ,N1JM.Bf.ll TYrf.OV SIGN. ""7r'\ALLO"'f.'P :r)(llM.I1'~~\)!;lSlfj'..~""'..'.' 'llf.QUIllf.U\l\EIGllT yf.ll SIGN a residential ,\\Ome occupation. iNlp.. [No g, Youse or building Ncs address number slgl'lS iNo 4 s<\u",e feet per side. 11' freestanding, shall not e"ceed 36 Inches In height 11' within a ,re<\uired sight distance triangle, or 4& Inches where outside 01' a sight distance triangle, If an organ\<lltlon lOgO is IncorpOrated Into tbe sign, tile logo sban not e'Sceed 1 square foot \n S\'Z.c. h, In!ormatiOnal SIgl'IS ,yes AccessOry to the Primary Use l'No S\>O,II not ""ceed & s<\ua<e fcet In size pet sign, I, political Compalgn ,yes Sigl'lS 2 S'l"",e 1'eet [No j. "RoontJor Rent" \Yes Sign k. RoofSigl'lS \'No ]>.10 limit 11'10 !. TemPorary \ yes decorations or displays when such are clearly associated with any national. local or religiOUS hOlidaY or celebration r----"," TrliJJic control or' yes RegulalOr)' SigllS ~es ... ~Jlehicle signll/le o. WinlloW or DoOr \yes SignS [NIp.. [No limit J.jo limit 1 per ~acant unit ~1Nl\f\\'l:.{""C ,"" \o,.-J:iV.\l.llv,QUJ.l<""u",. ,S\!.tBi\CR ,NIp.. (~one INOue ~one None J.1,o limit streets. Must mectthc provisions 01' Chapter ').6, Article fI/ , Sec, 26-41 9C, (' "restroolllS" "no smoldng," "wheel Chalr ,.e. ~ . -, (' II' II II t," entra1\ce," etc,), or dlrectlon... ..e, .n, Ou "tlUnp," "(\rive-\lIf\l," etc,)' }l\aJ be wall- mounted, freestanding nr attached to other freeStanding signS or canopies, butshal\ no! ,be collllted against the a\\owob\e s.t.< 01' another tYPe 01' permitted sign. tAaJ be i\\urninated bJ internal light on\J~ ~' Shan not be located In publie rlg\lt-of-waJ or on munlC\pOny owned property. ~ust be onthe property {or whl~ ad~ertlslng. As required bY regulation or statute of the federa\' state or munlc\pal go~ernU\ent. i\noWedo~t\Ve ~ehle\eS. Banners or tempOral")' signS attached to ~ehle\es are not anowed. ,permitted eveo If It Is visoble from outdOOrs. :rnose signs which adver\i.se tempOrarY uses such as ru""".ge sales, g",age sales and open 5 Mi\XIMUrd . 'NUM.BER ,orYPE OJ! SIGN i\LLO"WED \l'ERIdl'I ' \MAJUM.\JM sI7-E AND ,1tEQUIRED . HEIGH'I pER SIGN p,Menu gqa,diVrive ,NO Through DirecWr)' SignS 1. Order conflrmation\NO Boards _ ";nn Chart MINiM\Jrd SE'IBACJ.{ otHERREQ\JlREMENl'S , 6 'N~"_"'W-~~-'~-""" "." T""T ,. .... """,_ '" C_C>AL. _""",,^"" ,,- "" D" C (l'lC,RC,C-\,C-2,l) ,." ~ .'., l\iAX\!dU1\'\' "0 !dU'\!dU!d: ',' .,.., " ......, O'f\lER \l.EQU1l\E!dEN'fS - .. , ,.., ;.I,W",~D l.'ER1\'\l'f" 1\'\, "..,.".~SIZ~A..l'!D .. ;..,..' n'l.'EO}'S\G~ " "'.,' . REQUIRED llEIGll'fl.'ERSIGN NlJ!dllER' SE'fllACK 1. .j\nimated No 4S'luarefeet~ Iper~ NIA Can e"tend into rigbt-of-way with an appro\'ed 2. Arcade yes yes rigbt-of-way permit. w.;es, Sball not eJdend abOve the ~ busineSS bOttOm of ea\'e, balconY, conopy, awnlug or otner structural overhaUg or pasSageWay to which It Is affixed. Min\murn belght 7 feet above street frontage or sideWall< level. Yes yes !day use up to 50% of the allowed 1 per street N/A 3.'canopY wall sign allocation for canopies. frontage or major interior dri.ve yes !dnst follow the freestanding and 1 per street 5 feet from any '\'be time lapse between the cbange in 4. Cbangeable Copy Yes Information sball not be lesS than \5 secondS. wall siguage size and heigbt frontage, but propertY line if regulations. nO more tban freestanding, NIA 2 per if wall slgoage. development. Yes Bascd on table In section 26-708. I per street 10 feet wnere For neW development or total redevelopment, 5. Freestonding Yes all new freestOllding signs sttalllle placed 50 feet m",,\mum height allowed frontll\\e, not to edjacent to within londscal'ed arellS. ~ 1. !t.. for retail and service businesses exceed 2 per residentially zoned ,.. .. . .. within 114 roile from propertY line development, properties; "" "0' "T of an interstate highway ~ ~ ~ ; '., ' ~e. ~ ~ ~ .:-~ ~ AnY other perrn\ltOd freestondlng ~. ~ sign shall uot e"ceed IS feet In ~ 5 feet from - '.- height. street right-of-way "0' " ' \funder 7 feet in '0' , '0' nelght, 10 feet for ~ signs 7 to ~ IS feet high, and 30 feet for signs over ~ IS feet high, permitted only for publiC ond semi-public signs ~<"l"u....rnises Signs No ct4All'f 2' section 26-110 '\ _ ._dOc Sian Chart TYPE OF SIGN ALLOWED PERMIT MAXIMUM SIZE AND MAXIMUM MINIMUM OTHER REQUIREMENTS REQUIRED HEIGHT PER SIGN NUMBER SETBACK and billboards. 7. Portable Yes Yes 6 square feet per side per sign. 1 per street Must be setback a A-frame or pedestal style only, Must be frontage, but no p1;nin1l1fn of..J..Q....feet achored to the ground or weighted sufficiently more than 2 per 5 feet from any to prevent movement by wind. Must only be development. street right-of-way displayed during Donna! hours of operation. line if e>rer 36 inches May be located on a sidewalk provided that or 2 feet if lIB<leF 36 adequate clearance exists to meet ADA inches or less in requirements. Must be displayed only on the height. premise being advertised. 8. Projecting Yes Yes 1 square foot for each 1 foot of 1 per street May extend into Projecting and wall sign not permissable on height of the building wall to frontage per the right-of-way same wall. Maximum projection 10 feet-e:n4, which the sign is to be attached. business with an approved i8 aay eyoal, 8.t ',vithin 19 fe.l.flll. pr.p.Fly Maximum height, top of wall or right-of-way permit liae SF street Fight sf way. parapet; not to be roof mounted. Minimum height, 7 feet from street frontage or sidewalk. 9, Public and Semi- Yes No 6 square feet per sign 2 per To be determined May be located off-premises with approval of Public Signs organization by the Community property owner and Community Development or attraction Development Director. May be located in r-o-w with Director approval of Public Works Director, 10. D~~;~"'ntial No Subdivision Id{"ntifit"l'lti"n Signs 11. Temporary Suhcatep"ories: a. Balloons or other "Yes "Yes Balloons and required tethers 1 time per year None Pennitted only to advertise special events and inflatable devices cannot exceed the maximum for up to;>\) 60 sales. Shall be securely anchored or attached permitted building height for the days, or 2 times per so as to prevent dislocation, entanglement or zone district in which they are year for up to encroachment onto adjacent properties or located measured from existing ." 30 days each public streets, or undue hazard to motorists or grade. time, or 4 times per pedestrians. Roof mounting is permitted. year for up to 15 days each time. b. Banners Yes No Total size for any single or 1 per business N/A Permitt.. .nly t. advertise sp..inl .vonts an. combined banners affIXed to a or activity saJes,--Shall be securely anchored or attached wall based on one half (II2) the so as to prevent dislocation, entanglement or Commercial/Industrial/Mixed Use Zones Sign Chart 2 TYPE OF SIGN ALLOWED PERMIT" MAXIMUM SIZE AND' REQUIRED' HEIGHT PER SIGN allowance for wall signs. If aftiJ,ea ta roRse, size is the same as if it c. Construction Signs Yes d. Pennants, streamers Yes and similar devices e. Real Estate Signs Yes f Temporory Model No Home Signs 12, Wall or Painted Yes v:as attaehea t8 tile nearest No Shall not exceed 32 square feet Shall not exceed 8-fee! 7 feet in height Yes None No 50 square feet Yes No larger than I square foot for every linear foot of the side of the building to which it is affixed. Signs affIXed to attaeheel ar aetaSRi!a 8anABie~ and marquees Commercial/Industrial/Mixed Use Zones Sign Chart MAXIMUM NUMBER MINIMUM SETBACK I per street 5 feet frontage allowed between the time a building pemit is issued and a certificate of occupancy is obtained or any number of signs which are necessary for safety on the premises. 1 time per year None for up to 3{) 60 days, or 2 times per year for up to M 30 days each time, or 4 times per year for up to 15 days each time. I per street 5 feet frontage allowed I per street Nt A frontage or major interior drive per activity OTHERREQuuu:MENTS encroachment onto adjacent properties or public streets, or undue hazard to motorists or pedestrians, May be placed upon a building wall but shall not be attached to fencing, landscaping, freestanding posts or utility poles. Banners may be placed only on walls facing a public street or major interior drive. Teffifl8flU:: s:&""~ M :p.;......:'"Jel liBeler sastian 26 7091.. Shall not be illuminated. Must be located on the property where active construction work is occuring. Permitted only to advertise special events and sales. Shall be securely anchored or attached so as to prevent dislocation, entanglement or encroachment onto adjacent properties or public streets, or undue hazard to motorists or pedestrians. Tem138Far",' signs a:.'-., '. t'_........~eEl liBeler seetieR 26 709 L. Shall not be illuminated. Must be located on the property being advertised, For uses which have a rear entty or delivery door, 1 non illuminated wall sign per use. 3 M,.",UM\lM, MINIM\lM 01\lE\\\\EQ\lUlEMI"""" . T'" 0",0' _.... """,T """"O~ .,..'" .. """,,,,. ..",,,,.' . .. .. · .'. .. ., .,.. . """""", .,.,,,, "" "".. or awnings shall be considered wall signs and sball be calculated based uJ'On the length of the wall to whicb they arc attached or adjacent to. For buildings witb flat roofs, wall signs shall not extend abOve the to;> of ;>llflljlet or mansard, and if placed upon a parapet or mansard, shall not extend more than 3 feet above the dec\< line. ,,--- .," ..... ........-,,-...- ."..._MY. .."'" · ~ -.................-' -- -.........--........ is not eonsidered witbin tbe seOpe of tbls definition and is eonsidered a sign. Ni A lVIust be wall mounted. S P I ' '" --".."'~'" ".- ,,-'" ." .. -"' ~".. .. - ..... - ~~.,;;:;.. ",.~y .~ . \~ -~. Fla ole must Allowed when located on their own premises ,,"","'.".. Y" .. ~,,,,,..-"-,,,..,.. ,;- .-""'..-......- M-'''.)''''''- -" ....-."..,--.... . ' .' d . r ot.er sUnilar .-,C\al event. -""",,,., ~-_. - -'" "-..' ".- _. "...""'" ~ ^""'" -" "'".., -..... ......,.- -- "".,.".., "" '" -"" ~., ,,,,,M-. -, similar nonprofitorganiZation e, Flashing Signs and NO -'- . . . ... ......."'-...-- f."..'-'~' Y. .. """..-,-""."", · · ,,~..",...- ,~' - . 1 r 4 ,y __ C.\nn Chart ,.,~,...tc~r.". _.f""" ""('~\~'~~:.:.:' historiCal agencieS designating an area or property of local historical importance :-Ves g. HOJJleOccupation \'Ye., a' SigllS accessory to aresidcnt\a\ home otCu'Qat\on. iNo h. Bouse or building N" addresS nu",ber signs i. lliJormatiOnal Signs ,"{es . AccessOry to the Primary Use r-J. political Ca",paign ,"{es Signs 1<. "Room]or Rent"lYes Sign L Roof Signs' No ""Temporary ,"{es decorations or disPiays when such are clearly associated with any national. local or religiOUS holidaY or celebration ... Tr.iJfic control or iY es Regula/OJ')' Signs ~a"imum oU .quare feet in .i.... 1 per home oeeupation :NfA JsIA :No Ihnit INo 4 SQU5Iefeet per side. If freestandh,g, shall not exceed 36 inches in height if witnin a required sight d\s\ance triangle, or 48 inches where outside of a sight distance triangle, If an organu.auon logo is incorporated into tM sign. the logo shaU not e"'lceed 1 square foot in size. }lolimit INo }lo limit ,No ~,~... '-hart ~\J~' sv:rll,;.CK .,. ,:-- \O'fl1V,R R'EQ\Jl~"'~' j.tay be freestanding or wall mounted. . ,;.\loWed only on properties located on arte"al streets. 5' if freestanding :NIA 'No limit 'No limit :Must meetme provisions of Chapter 26, Article \V, SeC. 26-41 9C. INone li,e, "restrooms," "nO smo\ting," ,;;;meel chair , . _,I' "' "" ut" entrance," etc.), or direet\OnlU ,I,e. In, 0 , "rsmP," ";\rive.\lIfU," etc,), 1-\ay be wall- mounted. freestanding or attaChed to other freestanding signs or canopi.., but:na\1 not Ibe colJ1\ted against the allowable S1t.e of another I)'pe of per\llitted sign. 1-\~y be \\\um\nated by internal light onlY~ ~. S\la\l not be located in public right-of-Way or on municipaUy-owned propertY. ~ustbeOn~ advertising. ,None :None .... required by regulatioU or stlltute of tbe federal, state or municipal govertlment. 5 TYPE 01' SiG~ ALLOWED PE"Rl\!.l'f MAXiMUM SiZE AND MAXiMUM Mi~iMUM O'fHER RJl.QUiltJl.ME~TS " ' ,,' REQUlRJl.D HEiGHT pER SIGN ., NUMBER' SETBACK ,. ,'"" o. Wk2e!ed..a&erti!Ji1ig Allowed only No ~one ~one ~IA Banners or temporarY signs attached to ~ vehicle for currently vebicles are not allowed. signage licensed, operative vehicles wblch are l"ImarilY used by its owner for service, deliver)' or general tranSportation on a regnlar basis. p. Window or Door yes No Sign shall not obstrUct more tban WA WA permitted even If It Is vlsable from outdOOrs, Signs ~ZS percent of the door Those signs wblcb advertise temporarY uses or windoW area. such as rummage sales, garage sales and open. bouses shall be located on private propertY. ~:,n;:::mg~~:~ :W;~I~~ :::~~:~~i~ ;'~t~: q. Menu BourdIVrive yes yes 30 square feet per sign, Sball not 2 per commercial 10 feet from right- M'y be wall mounted or freestatldlng bUt will Through DirectOry exceed (; feet In heigbt if activity of-Way not be counted against the allowable number SignS freestatlding. If an organizational or size of another tylle of permitted sign. May logo In Incorporated intO the sign, be illuminated by internalllglltlng only. No the logo sball not exceed 1 square slgnage or advertising may be vls.ble from the foot in size. right-of-way. 1. Order confirUlatlon yes Yes 3 square feet per sign, Shall not 1 per drive througb 10 feet from rigllt- May be wall Ulounted or freestanding but will Boards exceed 4 feet in heigllt, jane of-way not be counted against the allowable number or size of another IYpe of permitted sign. May be illuminated by internalligllting only, No slgnage or advertising may be vlsable from the rigllt-of-way. 6 ~_~o" Sian Chart elsewhere, Lot 7 can be developed in accordance with applicable zoning regulations." The motion passed 8-0. B. Case No. ZOA-03-18: An ordinance amending Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to signage. ...L- The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She distributed a proposed amendment by staff regarding reader-board menus. She reviewed the staff report containing proposed amendments to the sign code. Previous suggestions made by the Commission were incorporated into the proposed amendments. In response to a question from Commissioner McMILLIN regarding the length of life for cabinet signs, Ms. Reckert stated that in talking with a sign company representative, she learned that the life depends upon the quality of construction. Nonconforming signs can stay until changes are requested, Commissioner SCEZNY questioned the value of making a differentiation between natural causes or vandalism in the destruction or removal of more than 50% of a nonconforming sign. There was discussion regarding a possible requirement to replace nonconforming signs regardless ofthe reason they are destroyed. There was a consensus of the Commission that it is very important to consider sight triangles when placing signs at signalized intersections. During discussion of banner regulations, Commissioner McMILLIN commented that he was surprised there have been no comments from the business community regarding limitation on banners. Chair PLUMMER invited comments from those in attendance. Miltou Tedford Mr. Tedford expressed concern about rental property which he constructed about twenty years ago south of 44th on Moore. The city granted a temporary sign permit and, for the past twenty years he has had a sign on private property located at 44th and Moore. He has an agreement with the property owner for placement of the sign. He stated the sign is crucial in obtainrng tenants for his 52 rental units on Moore. On August 3, 2004, he received notification from the city that the sign was in violation because it was an off-premises sign. His suggestions to remedy the situation included: (I) ,that his sign be grandfathered; (2) that the sign code allow p.vp",,~j within 100 yards of a main arterial street to have off-premises signage; and (3) twenty years with the sign in the same place should be supported under the statute of limitations. He submitted photos of his property and other off-premises signs along West 44th Avenue. Ms. Reckert commented that while there was evidence that a temporary sign permit was issued in 1985, there are no records showing that it was everrenewed. Planning Commission October 7, 2004 Page 4 ATTACHMENT 2 Nancy Snow 11155 West 40th Ms. Snow expressed concern about large balloons that block views of mountains and excessive pennants and banners that clutter up the city and detract from landscaping. She agreed with a height limit for balloons but would like to see a size limit, also. She would also like to see a limit on the size and number of streamers and pennants. She also pointed out that flags are not defined in sign code and there is no limit on their size or number. She would like to see a limit on the number of political signs to eliminate several signs in one yard for the same candidate or issue. There also needs to be a definition in the chart for changeable signs. Gretchen Cerveny Ms. Cerveny testified as the city's mayor and former small business owner. She stated that part of the attraction of Wheat Ridge is its eclectic nature. City revenues come from use and sales taxes and business licenses and therefore the sign code should be supportive of businesses. Small businesses often have very limited resources and banners and pennants are inexpensive ways to advertise. She supported a limitation on the number of temporary permits since small business owners have a hard time leaving their businesses to keep getting permits and the city is limited on hiring people to keep track of the permits. She favored allowing businesses to have at least one banner. She suggested educational efforts to inform small business owners about signage. She favored a sign code that is flexible and that will honor the diversity of Wheat Ridge. " There was a consensus of the Commission that the sign code needs more consideration. Staff will also survey surrounding jurisdictions regarding their sign codes. It was moved by Commissioner McNAMEE and seconded by Commissioner WESLEY to continue Case No. ZOA-03-18 to a date uucertain. The motion passed unanimously. 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business to come before the Commission. 10. COMMISSION REPORTS There were no Commission reports. 11. COMMITTEE AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS There were no committee and department reports. 12. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner CHIL VERS and seconded by Commissioner STEWART to adjourn the meeting at 10:02 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. e Phil Plummer, Chair Ann Lazzeri, Recording Secretary Planning Commission October 7, 2004 Page 5 the recently installed city lighting, such as along 38th A venue, illegal and cause a financial burden to the city for lighting replacement. Commissioner McMILLIN commented that the ordinance won't require replacement of the lights, but any new lighting would have to conform to the ordinance. Mayor Cerveny stated that she would like to see any new lighting look the same as that already installed. Chair PLUMMER commented that shields could be placed on existing lights without a great deal of expense. New lighting could look the same and still conform to the new lighting standards. There was discussion about giving direction to staff to research and report on options for retrofitting existing street and pedestrian lights It was moved by Commissioner McMILLIN and seconded by Commissioner WESLEY that the ordinance be amended under Section E, 1 ''Parking Lots" to read: Maximum foot-candles shall not exceed ten (10) foot-candles for parking lots measured as an average of readings taken directly under a main lighting standard and directly between two lighting standards in the interior of the parking lot. The motion passed 3-2 with Commissioners CIDL VERS and SCEZNEY voting no and Commissioners STEWART and WITT absent. It was moved by Conunissioner McMILLIN and seconded by Commissioner WESLEY that Case No. ZOA-03-18, proposed amendments to Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws regarding the sign code, be approved with the amendment to Section E, 1. The motion passed 5-0 with Commissioners STEWART and WITT absent. - B. Case No. ZOA.03-18: An ordinance amending Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws pertaining to signage. ..-../ This case was presented by Meredith Reckert. There was jurisdiction to hear the case and Ms. Reckert reviewed the staff report. Time limits on the disPlay of political signs and number of signs allowed per candidate or issue were diScussed and whether or not time limits would infringe upon freedom of speech. Commissioner WESLEY suggested that the city attorney research case law regarding such limitations and their relation to freedom of speech. Amortization for nonconforming signs was discussed. Commissioner CHlL VERS commented that it is important to reach a long-term solution to nonconforming signs in the city.' Commissioner WESLEY suggested defining political campaign signs which would be different than political signs. Chair PLUMMER asked to hear from members of the public. Planning Commission January 20, 2005 Page 3 ATTACHMENT 3 Gretchen Cerveny 3425 Moore Street Mayor Cerveny asked for more clarification regarding flags, pennants and streamers. She asked if flags on light poles along 38th, balloons such as those on dealership automobiles, and streamers such as on Casey's RV were allowed under the proposed ordinance. Ms. Reckert explained that the 38th A venue business district and holiday flags are permitted under the flags for non-profit organizations or holiday decorations categories of the regulations. The streamers similar to those at Casey's RV are allowed up to 30 days per year; The balloon regulations apply to large adverti,sing balloons and not small balloons such as those attached to automobiles at dealerships. It was moved by Commissioner McMILLIN and seconded by Commissioner CIDL VERS that Case No. ZOA-03-18, proposed amendments to Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws regarding sign code, b,e forwarded to City Council with a recommendation of . approval for the following reasons: 1. The changes will improve readability and understanding of the sign code. 2. The changes deal more effectively with negative effects of exterior lighting on adjacent properties. With the following conditions: 1. Accept Option B amortizing nonconformities over a five-year deadline and eliminating section (B) of Option B pertaining to discontIllued businesses. The city attorney will research case law regarding time limitations for political campaign signs as they relate to free speech. The category for ''Pennants, streamers, and similar devises" be expanded as discussed. ~ 2. 3. The motion passed 5-0 with Commissioners STEWART and WITT absent. 8. OLD BUSINESS There was no old business to corne before the Commission. 9. NEW BUSINESS There was no new business to corne before the Commission. 10. COMMISSION REPORTS There were no commission reports. 11. COMlVUllJ!..E AND DEPARTMENT REPORTS There were no committee and department reports. Planning Commission January 20, 2005 Page 4 April 01,2007 Some thoughts related to the Wheat Ridge Sign Code: 1. Encourage the display of public art by not automatically considering "art" as "signage" when its' subject directly or abstractly relates to the business that is displaying it. For example: A cat hospital displaying at its front door a large sculpture of a kitten with a ball of twine, or a green dinosaur statue at a Sinclair station, should not have the square feet of the sculpture subtracted from its' allotted "signage". The appropriateness and allowability of the "art" could be determined by the Board of Adjustment, but on the basis of its' art component rather than the current "excess signage" perspective, 2. Encourage "icon" type signage. Example: A coffee shop sign with a cut-out of a coffee cup (the icon) standing above it, or a vision clinic with a pair of eye glasses hanging under it, a gift store with a gift box attached to the sign, etc. These icon signs work well for the business and for the passing customer, and allow a point of visual interest to the shopping area without adding to the clutter of conventional signage. Allow within limits, that the icon portion of the signage not be included in the total calculation of allowable square footage, 3. Discourage the use of excessive banners and other temporary signage, as currently occurs in particular at liquor stores and taverns, Possibly just enforce the current code, 4, Allow some type of "home business" signage. If code described design criteria are applied to these signs they would not be "objectionable" at all, and would add to the value ofthe business to the surrounding community and therefore the viability of the business and the city sales tax base, The compatibility or lack of compatibility of the signage to the neighborhood could easily be determined by the Board of Adjustment. 5. Take a good objective look at the current prohibitions related to "moving", "flashing", etc. components of the current code. I feel that the broad assumptions related to citizen "safety" are far too weighted from the perspective of myth and urban legend rather than actual data and science, I feel that some motion component could be allowed in select cases and or locations. 6. Take a good look at the visual "clutter" being caused by the city itself in its' ever- growing number of traffic signs related to warnings, cautions, and other ';;necessary" "information". Tom Abbott 10780 W. 35tl' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO ATTACHMENT 4 ITEM NO: 3, REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ~''''..- ~ ","ni:"'o-;:~~',:',";:' ~:~~lY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11,2007 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL 07-2007, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO PROVIDE FORltl~ ZONING OF SOCIAL CLUBS, AND COUNCIL BILL 08-2007, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF Ttl~ WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO INCLUDE A NEW ARTICLE XI CONCERNING TifE LICENSING OF SOCIAL CLUBS, CASE NO. ZOA-06-05 IZI PUBLIC HEARING D BIDS/MOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date: May 14, 2007) IZI ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING Quasi-Judicial: D Yes IZI No ~4^ aId= City~ Community Development Director EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Currently social clubs are permitted uses in the C-l, C-2 and I zone districts. They are combined with "private clubs, bingo parlors, and similar uses." The zoning regulations do not contain a definition of social club and there are no other reqillrements or restrictions on the location of social clubs. Social clubs are required to obtain a business license, The proposed amendment to Chapter 26 defines social clubs and lists them separately in the use chart for commercial and industrial uses. Social clubs will be permitted uses in the C-l, C-2, and I zone districts, as they are now, but with the added requirements proposed in a companion ordinance amending Chapter II. The ordinance amending chapter 11 requires the owners of such establislunents to obtain a social club license and requires such establislunents to be located 100 feet from residentially zoned properties, or any properties zoned A-I or A-2 and used residentially. Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amending Chapter 26. These ordinances implement Council's strategic goal of creating a strong partnership with the community. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: At a public hearing on May 3, 2007 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance amending Chapter 26. No board or commission is required to review amendments to Chapter II. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The proposed ordinance changes were presented to City Council at the February 20th study session. The Chapter 26 changes were discussed with Planning Commission at a study session on April 5, 2007. The Chapter 26 amendments include the addition of the following definition for social clubs: "A busiuess whose sole, exclusive, or principle service provided is the leasing of space to persons or groups for private events such as parties or fundraisers. Social clubs do not include liquor licensed establishments, private clubs or lodges, hotels, public and private schools, colleges or universities, or churches." This definition was modified based on a recommendation from Planning Commission, The definition does not include bars and similar establislunents that are required to obtain a liquor license because the liquor licensing process and revocation procedures provide a level of control of the conduct at the establislunent which is sought to be controlled by the social club license. Also not included in the definition are establislunents such as Elks Club, VFW, or Sons ofItaly, who occasionally may rent out halls for various functions, but whose sole business is not renting out the facility to private parties. Under the Chapter 26 changes, Social clubs will be permitted uses in the C-I, C-2, and I zone districts, as they are now and would also be allowed in PCDs and PIDs unless specifically prohibited or not listed. Many older PCDs and PlDs simply reference the Cl, C-2 and I zone districts. The amendments to Chapter 11 require the owners of such establislunents to obtain a license from the City to operate a social club. The license requirements are modeled after the adult business license requirements, and there is the additional requirement that such uses must be located 100 feet from residentially zoned properties. (Three options were presented to Council at the February 20, 2007 study session and Council selected 100 feet, See Attaclunent 3 for a map of areas that would be available for these establislunents.) Unlike adult businesses, there is no distance requirement proposed from schools, day care facilities, churches, parks, recreation centers, or community centers. The license requires a background check of owners and managers and, if issued, must be renewed annually. Prior to issuing licenses or renewals, inspections of the premises are conducted by the building official and fire marshal. Site plans are also required to be submitted in order to assess the adequacy of parking and impacts oflighting, trash storage, etc. on adjacent residential uses. The licensing ordinance requires the owner or a manager to be present during events, A social club cannot operate during the hours of2:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. A license may be denied or, if issued, may be suspended or revoked for a number of reasons, including incidents of disorderly conduct, consuming or possessing narcotics or dangerous drugs by persons on the premises, the manager is not present on the premises during an event, being open beyond the allowable hours of operation specified in the ordinance, public displays of indecency on the premises or immediately adjacent thereto, acts of prostitution, consumption of alcoholic beverages by persons under 21 or visibly intoxicated persons, and making false statements on the application. Denial, suspension or revocation of a license may be appealed to the City Manager. Two of the existing social clubs (there are three in the City) are recognized as legal nonconforming uses in the ordinance and are allowed to remain at their current locations, even if the distance requirements are not met. However, all existing establishments would be required to obtain a license and be subject to all of the other conduct requirements of the licensing ordinance. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Do not amend the regulations. Adopt the zoning changes, but not the licensing requirements. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Adoption ofthe amendment to Chapter 26 does not result in a financial impact to the City. Adoption ofthe Chapter II amendment will require additional staff time to implement; to conduct background checks, to review site plans and spacing requirements, and review application information. The following fees are proposed which will help defray these costs: licensing fee - $500.00; processing fee - $150.00; renewal fee - $250.00. The three existing establishments would pay fees totaling $1,950.00 in the first year and $750.00 in each subsequent year. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Council Bill 07-2007 on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication. " "I move to adopt Council Bill 08-2007 on second reading and that it take effect 15 days after final publication. " Or, "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill 07-2007 and Council Bill 08-2007." Report Prepared by: Alan White, Community Development Director Reviewed by: Attachments: 1. Council Bill 07-2007. 2. Council Bill 08-2007. 3. Map of Potential Social Club Locations CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. 07-2007 Ordinance No. ~AN"C. Series of 2007 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 26 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO PROVIDE FOR THE ZONING OF SOCIAL CLUBS WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there has been an increase in complaints regarding the operation of social clubs in the City, specifically with respect to crime, disorderly conduct, litter, noise, traffic and parking; and WHEREAS, such operation of social clubs affects the livability of the adjacent neighborhoods, especially residential neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to minimize and control the adverse effects that social clubs may have within the City and thereby protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens; preserve the quality of life; preserve the property values and character of surrounding neighborhoods; deter the spread of urban blight and protect citizens from increased crime; and WHEREAS, separating social clubs from residential neighborhoods would serve to protect the health, safety and welfare, improve the quality of life, and protect property values of the citizenry; and WHEREAS, locational requirements alone do not adequately protect the health, safety, and general welfare of citizens and thus, certain requirements with respect to the licensing and operation of social clubs are in the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 26-123 of the City's Code of Laws is hereby amended by the addition of the following definition to be added alphabetically: Social Club. A business whose sole, exclusive, or principal service provided is the leasing of space to persons or groups for private events such as parties or fund raisers. Social clubs do not include liquor licensed establishments, ATTACHMENT 1 private clubs or lodges, hotels, public and private schools, colleges or universities, or churches. Section 2. Section 26-204 of the City's Code of Laws is hereby amended by adding to the Table of Uses - Commercial and Industrial Districts, the following: I Uses Social club Notes NC In accordance with Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Chapter " , article XI RC C-' C-2 P P I P Section 2. Safetv Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after final publication, as provided by Section 5." of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 14th day of May , 2007, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for _ .Tnn" 11 , 2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, reading by ADOPTED AND a vote of , 2007. ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final to this day of 2 SIGNED by the Mayor on this 2007. ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk First Publication: May 17. 2007 Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: day of Jerry DiTullio, Mayor Approved As To Form Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney 3 CITY OF WHEAT RI DGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SANG Council Bill No. 08-2007 Ordinance No. Series of 2007 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS TO INCLUDE A NEW ARTICLE XI CONCERNING THE LICENSING OF SOCIAL CLUBS WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there has been an increase in complaints regarding the operation of social clubs in the City, specifically with respect to crime, disorderly conduct, litter, noise, traffic and parking; and WHEREAS, such operation of social clubs affects the livability of the adjacent neighborhoods, especially residential neighborhoods; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to minimize and control the adverse effects that social clubs may have within the City and thereby protect the health, safety, and welfare of citizens; preserve the quality of life; preserve the property values and character of surrounding neighborhoods; deter the spread of urban blight and protect citizens from increased crime; and WHEREAS, Colorado courts have determined that social clubs are not subject to the state's beer and liquor license codes; and WHEREAS, separating social clubs from residential neighborhoods would serve to protect the health, safety and welfare, improve the quality of life, and protect property values of the citizenry; and WHEREAS, the regulation of social clubs within the City through licensing would protect and preserve the health, safety and welfare of the patrons of such clubs as well as the citizens of the City; and WHEREAS, nominal license fees are directly related to the cost of regulating social clubs and are necessary to help defray the expense incurred by the City of such regulation; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: V 4020907 ATTACHMENT 2 Section 1. Chapter 11 of the City's Code of Laws, entitled "Licenses, Permits and Miscellaneous Business Regulations," is hereby amended by adding a new Article XI, Social Clubs, as follows: ARTICLE XI. SOCIAL CLUBS Sec. 11-250. Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this article, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: Applicant means and includes: (1) If an individual, that person making an application for a license under this article; (2) If a partnership, the partners owning ten (10) percent or more of the partnership which is making application for a license under this article; (3) If a corporation, the president, vice-president, secretary, treasurer, the directors, manager and each stockholder owning ten (10) percent or more of the stock of the corporation. Alcohol beverage means fermented malt beverage or malt, vinous, or spirituous liquors as those terms are defined in the Colorado Beer Code and the Colorado Liquor Code at C.R.S, 99 12-46-103 and 12-47-103, respectively; except that "alcohol beverage" shall not include confectionery containing alcohol within the limits prescribed by section 25-5-410(1 )(i)(II), C.R.S. Assault means a knowing or reckless or criminally negligent causing of bodily injury of a person by another. City manager means the city manager for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, or the city manager's designee. Club or lodge, private means an association of persons for the promotion of some nonprofit common object, such as literature, science, politics or good fellowship, meeting periodically, limited to members, within a building, not more than one-third (1/3) of the gross floor area of which is used for residential occupancy. Examples: Elks, Masons, Kiwanis, etc. Disorderly conduct means the intentional, knowing, or reckless: V4020907 2 (1) Making of a coarse and obviously offensive utterance, gesture or display when such utterance, gesture or display causes injury or tends to invite an immediate breach of the peace; (2) Abusing or threatening a person in an obviously offensive manner; or (3) Fighting with another in a public place, except as a participant in a sporting event. Finance division means the finance division for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Investigator means a member of the Wheat Ridge Police Department. Manager includes the person or those persons who manage, direct, supervise, oversee and administer the acts, transactions and acts of servants of the establishments governed by this article. Patron means a person present during the time the social club is open and operating who is not the licensee or its manager, employee, or agent. Premises means that area as defined in the social club license. Social club means a private business that leases space to persons for private events, such as parties or fund raisers. Social clubs do not include liquor licensed establishments, private clubs or lodges, hotels, public and private schools, colleges or universities, or churches. All other words and phrases used in this article shall have the meanings attached by this Code or by the Colorado Statutes regulating the sale of liquor, or if not otherwise defined by law, as used in their common, ordinary and accepted sense and meaning. Sec. 11-251. Location of social clubs. (a) It is unlawful to operate or cause to be operated a social club in any location except as provided in this Code. (b) It is unlawful to operate or cause to be operated a social club within one hundred (100) feet of the property line of any lot, tract or parcel of land within the City which is zoned for residential use, or zoned A-1 or A-2 and used for residential purposes. (c) For the purpose of subsection (b) of this section, the distance between a social club and a residential district or a residential lot shall be measured in a V 4020907 3 straight line, without regard to intervening structures, objects or city limits, from the closest exterior wall of the structure in which the social club is located to the property line of such use. (d) A social club lawfully operating on the effective date of this article, , 2007, is not rendered a nonconforming use by the present or subsequent location of a residential district or a residential lot within one hundred (100) feet of the social club; however, if a social club becomes a legal, nonconforming use as a result of the passage of this ordinance and it ceases operation for a period of sixty (60) days or more regardless of any intent to resume operation, it may not recommence operation in that location. (e) A social club lawfully operating within the city as of the effective date of this article that does not conform with the zoning requirement of Chapter 26 of this Code may continue to exist as a legal nonconforming use after the effective date of this article only if it otherwise complies with the provisions of this article within ninety (90) days of the effective date of this article. The city's regulations concerning nonconforming uses, found at Section 26-120 of this Code, shall apply to such nonconforming uses. Sec. 11-252. License required; original license fee; application fees; license renewal. (a) No person shall conduct or operate a social club without first having obtained a social club license issued by the city as required by this article. This requirement to obtain a social club license is in addition to the requirement to obtain a business license pursuant to Article II of this Chapter. Each applicant shall pay an initial social club license fee of five hundred dollars ($500.00). (b) Each applicant, whether an individual, partnership, limited liability company, or corporation, shall pay the following application fees at the time of submitting any application to the finance division: (1) An application processing fee of one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00). Such application fee shall be nonrefundable. (2) An application investigation fee in the amount then charged by the Wheat Ridge police department for each person who will be investigated as required by this article, plus those costs incurred by the City for outside agency review pursuant to section 11-255(b). Such application investigation fee shall be nonrefundable following a determination by the finance division that the application is complete in accordance with section 11-254. The application investigation fee shall be refunded upon written request by the applicant in the event that the applicant withdraws its application prior to the finance division's determination that the application is complete. V4020907 4 (c) In the event an application for a social club license is withdrawn prior to issuance or to being denied, the original license fee, but not the application processing fee or the application investigation fee, shall be refunded in full to the applicant. (d) Renewal of an existing license issued pursuant to this article shall be granted upon the payment of the annual licensing fee of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) and the filing of a completed renewal application with the finance division not less than forty-five (45) days prior to the date of license expiration. The finance division may waive the timely filing requirement where the licensee demonstrates in writing that the failure to timely file is not solely the result of the applicant's neglect; provided that no renewal application shall be accepted by the finance division from any licensee after the license expires. (e) A license that is under suspension may be renewed in accordance with this section provided that such renewal shall not modify, alter, terminate, or shorten the period or term of the suspension. The suspension of a license shall not extend the term of the license or otherwise relieve the licensee from timely seeking renewal of the license in accordance with this section. Sec. 11-253. License application. (a) All applicants for a social club license shall file a completed application for such license with the finance division on forms to be provided by the finance division. (b) The completed application shall contain the following information and shall be accompanied by the following documents: (1) Each individual applicant, partner of a partnership, managing officer or managing director of a corporation, the manager of a limited liability company and all business managers shall be named in each application form, and each of them shall be photographed and fingerprinted by the Wheat Ridge police department. The Wheat Ridge police department shall thereafter forward such photographs and fingerprints to all appropriate referral agencies, including the finance division who shall include them in the application. (2) If the applicant is: a. An individual, the individual shall state such person's legal name and any aliases and submit satisfactory proof that the individual is eighteen (18) years of age or older; b. A partnership, the partnership shall state its complete name and the names of all partners, whether the partnership is general or limited, and provide a copy of the partnership agreement, if any; V 4020907 5 c. A corporation, the corporation shall state its complete name, the date of its incorporation, evidence that the corporation is in good standing under the statutes of the State of Colorado, or in the case of a foreign corporation, evidence that it is currently authorized to do business in the State of Colorado, the names and capacity of all officers, directors, and the name of the registered corporate agent and the address of the registered office for service of process; d. A limited liability company, the company shall state its complete name, the date of its formation, evidence that the company is in good standing under the statutes of the State of Colorado, or in the case of a foreign company, evidence that it is currently authorized to do business in the State of Colorado and the name of its members, the manager, and registered agent and the address of the registered office for service of process. (3) The applicant shall state whether the applicant or any other individual listed pursuant to subsection (b)(1) of this section has previously operated or is currently operating or has been employed at an unlicensed social club as defined in this article or has had a previous social club license under this article or other social club ordinances, resolutions or regulations from another municipality or county denied, suspended or revoked, or declared a public nuisance, including the name and location of the social club for which the permit was denied, suspended or revoked, or been declared a public nuisance, as well as the date of the denial, suspension or revocation. Additionally, the applicant shall state whether the applicant or any other individuals listed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section has been a partner in a partnership or an officer or director of a corporation or manager of a limited liability company of a social club whose license has previously been denied, suspended or revoked, including the name and location of the social club for which the license was denied, suspended or revoked, as well as the date of the denial, suspension or revocation. The applicant shall state whether the applicant or any other individual listed pursuant to subsection (b)(1) of this section holds any other licenses under this article or other similar social club ordinance or regulation from another municipality or county and, if so, the names and locations of such other permitted businesses; (4) The location of the proposed social club, including a legal description of the property, street address, and telephone number(s), if any; (5) Proof of the applicant's right to possession of the premises wherein the social club will be conducted; (6) The applicant's mailing address and residential address; (7) The applicant's social security number, driver's license number and/or federally issued tax identification number or, if the applicant is not a natural person, such information for the individuals listed in subsection (b)(2)b., c. and d V 4020907 6 (8) A current improvement location certificate depicting parking areas, location and type of exterior lighting, trash storage areas, loading areas, entrances to the structure and existing setbacks of all structures and a straight- line drawing prepared by a land surveyor, prepared within thirty (30) days prior to the application, and depicting the property lines and the structures containing any social club within one hundred (100) feet of the closest exterior wall of the structure in which the social club will be located and the property line of any church, school, child care facility, public park, recreational center, community center, residential zone district, or a residential lot within one hundred (100) feet from the closest exterior wall of the structure in which the social club will be located. (9) If the applicant intends to operate the social club under a name other than that of the applicant, the applicant shall state the business name to be used and submit copies of documentation evidencing the registration of the business name under applicable laws. Sec. 11-254. Determination of completed application. (a) Not more than ten (10) days following submission of an application, the finance division shall review the application for completeness and conformance with the application requirements of section 11-253. The finance division shall not accept for filing any application that is not complete in every detail. (b) All applicants shall promptly notify the finance division in writing in the event that any information contained in an application has changed or any information is discovered by the applicant to be incorrect in any way from what is stated on the application, and every applicant shall have the continuing duty to promptly update and supplement such information during the term of any social club license issued to the applicant. Sec. 11-255. Investigation. (a) Upon receipt of a complete application, the finance division shall transmit the application to the Wheat Ridge police department, which shall cause the investigation of the applicant and the manager of the social club and the accuracy of the information provided in the application. The police department shall submit a written report of the investigation to the finance division within thirty (30) days after receiving the application from the finance division. (b) Within five (5) days of receipt of an application for a social club license, the finance division shall notify the local fire marshal and the community development department of such application. Review costs incurred by the City for outside referral agency review shall be paid by the applicant as part of the application investigation fee imposed pursuant to section 11-252(b)(2). V4020907 7 (c) The local fire marshal and the community development department shall commence the inspection of the premises for which a social club license is sought promptly upon receipt of notice of the application, and shall complete a written certification of whether the premises are in compliance with the building code and the zoning code within fifteen (15) days after receipt of the application. (d) The finance division may cause to be conducted any other investigation deemed necessary to determine the application's conformance with any requirement of this article. Sec. 11-256. Approval or denial of application. (a) A completed license application shall be administratively approved or denied by the finance division within sixty (60) days of the date of the filing of a complete application. The finance division shall deny a license application if: (1) The applicant is under the age of eighteen (18) years; (2) The application or any investigation performed or ordered by the city demonstrates or establishes that the proposed social club fails to conform to any requirement of this article, the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, or other applicable law; (3) The applicant knowingly made a false statement or knowingly gave false information in connection with the application; (4) The individual applicant or a director or officer of a corporation, partner of a partnership, or manager of a limited liability company or manager of the social club has had a social club license revoked or suspended within five (5) years prior to the application; (5) The individual applicant or a director or officer of a corporation, or partner of a partnership or manager of a limited liability company or manager of the social club has operated a social club as defined in this article which was determined to be a public nuisance under state, federal or local law within five (5) years prior to the application; (6) A partnership, corporate or limited liability company applicant is not in good standing or authorized to do business in the State of Colorado; or (7) The applicant is overdue in payment to the city of taxes, fees, fines, or penalties assessed against the applicant or imposed against the applicant in relation to any business in which the applicant is the owner of at least a ten percent (10%) interest. V4020907 8 (b) In the event that the finance division approves a license application, the finance division shall notify the applicant of such approval in writing, sent by certified mail to the address of the applicant as shown in the application. Nothing in this article shall prevent or preclude the finance division from revoking such approval where it is discovered that the application contained or included a false or incorrect statement or false or incorrect information which would otherwise constitute sufficient grounds or basis for the denial of the application. Approval of a license application shall not constitute issuance of a social club license. Issuance of a license shall be made only in accordance with section 11-257. The decision of the finance division to approve a license application shall not be construed as a quasi-judicial act but shall be a final administrative decision of the city. (c) The finance division's approval of a license application shall be valid for one year following the date of approval. Failure to obtain the issuance of the license pursuant to section 11-257 within such one-year period shall require the submission of a new application. (d) In the event that the finance division denies a license application, the finance division shall prepare written findings of fact and a decision stating the reasons or basis for the denial. A copy of the finance division's findings and decision shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address of the applicant as shown in the application within ten (10) days after the date of the finance division's denial. The finance division's decision to deny a license application shall become a final administrative decision of the city on the fourteenth day following the date of the decision unless the applicant files a timely request for appeal to the city manager as provided by section 11-260. Sec. 11-257. Issuance of license. (a) No license shall be issued by the finance division after approval of an application until such time as the building in which the business is to be conducted is ready for occupancy with such furniture, fixtures, and equipment in place as are necessary to comply with the provisions of this article and other applicable codes of the city or state, and then only after inspection of the premises and certification that the applicant has complied with the plans and specifications approved by the city with the application. (b) If the licensed premises has been closed or inactive for at least sixty (60) days, the finance division may revoke or elect not to renew the license. Sec. 11-258. Term of the license. All licenses issued pursuant to this article shall be valid for twelve (12) months from the date of issuance, unless sooner revoked. V 4020907 9 Sec. 11-259. Suspension; revocation of license. (a) The finance division may suspend or revoke a license upon a finding of any of the following factors: (1) Any incident of disorderly conduct, a violation of Chapter 16 of this Code, or any violation of Sections 11-263 through 11-268 of this Article have occurred upon the licensed premises or upon any parking areas, sidewalks, access ways or grounds within the immediate neighborhood of the licensed premises involving a patron or customer, manager, employee, or the licensee; (2) The licensee, manager, or any employees thereof illegally offered for sale or illegally allowed to be consumed or possessed upon the licensed premises, or upon any parking areas, sidewalks, walkways, access ways or grounds immediately adjacent to the licensed premises, narcotics or dangerous drugs; (3) The licensee or manager is not upon the licensed premises at all times that the licensed premises is open for business or at all times when the licensed premises is occupied by any employee, agent, patron, invitee, or other person; (4) The licensed premises was open for business during hours prohibited by this article; (5) The licensee, manager, or employee has allowed or permitted patrons or employees to engage in acts of prostitution or negotiations for acts of prostitution within the licensed establishment or upon any parking areas, sidewalks, access ways, or grounds immediately adjacent to the licensed establishment; (6) The licensee, manager, or employee has allowed or permitted patrons to engage in public displays of indecency or has allowed or permitted patrons or employees to engage in acts of public urination or defecation within the licensed establishment or upon any parking areas, sidewalks, access ways, or grounds immediately adjacent to the licensed establishment; (7) The licensee, manager, or employee has allowed the consumption of an alcohol beverage within the licensed premises, or upon any parking areas, sidewalks, walkways, access ways or grounds immediately adjacent to the licensed premises, by (1) any person under the age of twenty-one (21) years; (2) a habitual drunkard; or (3) a visibly intoxicated person; or has permitted any person under the age of eighteen (18) years to participate in the serving of an alcohol beverage within the licensed premises. V 4020907 10 (8) The licensee or manager knowingly made a false statement or knowingly gave false information in connection with an application for a license or a renewal of a license; (9) The licensee, manager, or employee knowingly violated or knowingly allowed or permitted a violation of any provision of this article; (10) A manager of the licensed establishment is under the age of eighteen (18) years; (11) The licensee, in the case of a corporation or limited liability company, is not in good standing or authorized to do business in the State of Colorado; (12) The licensee is delinquent in payment to the city or state for any taxes or fees past due; or. (13) Any other violation of this Article. (b) No such suspension shall be for a longer period than six (6) months. (c) In the event of suspension or cessation of business, no portion of the license fee shall be refunded. (d) In addition to the factors listed in subsection (a), the finance division may revoke any license granted pursuant to this article upon a finding that either: (1) The social club was operated and open during a period of time when the social club license was suspended; or (2) The license application should have been denied under the criteria set forth in section 11-256(a). Sec. 11-260. Appeals. (a) Application denial. In the event that the finance division denies a license application, an applicant shall have the right to a quasi-judicial hearing before the city manager for the purpose of appealing the finance division's administrative decision. A written request for a hearing shall be made to the city manager within ten (10) days of the date of the mailing of the finance division's written findings and decision denying the license application. The hearing shall be conducted within ten (10) days of the city manager's receipt of the written request for a hearing unless a later date is requested by the applicant. Upon receipt of a timely request for a hearing, the city manager shall schedule a hearing and notify the applicant of the date, time, and place of the hearing. Such notification may be made by the city by telephone provided that a written notice shall also be mailed or delivered to the applicant at the applicant's address shown in the application. V 4020907 11 An applicant may be represented at the hearing by an attorney or other representative, An applicant or the city may request a continuance or postponement of the hearing date. In no event shall the city be entitled to more than one (1) continuance unless agreed to by the applicant. (b) Suspension; revocation. If the city seeks to suspend or revoke a license, the licensee shall be entitled to a quasi-judicial hearing before the city manager, When there is probable cause to believe that a licensee has violated or permitted a violation of this article to occur in or near the licensed establishment, the city attorney may file a written complaint with the city manager setting forth the circumstances of the violation. The city manager shall send a copy of the complaint by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the licensee at the address as shown on the license application, together with a notice to appear before the city manager for the purpose of a hearing to be conducted at a specified date and time and at a place designated in the notice to show cause why the licensee's license should not be suspended. Such hearing shall be held on a date not less than fourteen (14) days following the date of mailing of the complaint and notice to the licensee. (c) The city manager shall have the power to issue subpoenas granted to municipal courts pursuant to the Colorado municipal court rules of procedure, Rule 217; the power to administer oaths; and, when necessary, the power to grant continuances. (d) At the hearing, the city manager shall hear and consider such evidence and testimony presented by the city, the applicant, and any other witnesses presented by the city or the applicant which are relevant to (i) the stated reason and basis for the finance division's denial of the license application or (ii) whether the violations that are the basis for the suspension or revocation occurred. The city manager shall conduct the hearing in conformity with quasi-judicial proceedings and shall permit the relevant testimony of witnesses, cross- examination, and presentation of relevant documents and other evidence. The hearing shall be recorded by electronic recording device. Any person requesting a transcript of such record shall pay the reasonable cost of preparing the record. (e) Not less than ten (10) days following the conclusion of the hearing, the city manager shall send a written order by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the applicant or licensee at the address as shown on the application or license, as applicable. (1) In the case of an application denied by the finance division, the order shall include findings of fact and a final decision concerning the approval or denial of the application. If the city manager approves the application, such approval shall constitute approval by the finance division, and the applicant may seek issuance of a license in accordance with Section 11-257. V 4020907 12 (2) In the case of a suspension or revocation, the city manager shall make written findings of fact from the statements and evidence offered and shall reach a conclusion as to whether the alleged violations occurred. If the city manager determines that a violation did occur that warrants suspension or revocation of the license pursuant to Section 11-259, the city manager shall also issue an order suspending or revoking the license. A copy of the findings, conclusion, and order shall be hand-delivered or mailed to the licensee by certified mail, return receipt requested, at the address as shown on the license application. (f) The order of the city manager made pursuant to this section shall be a final decision and may be appealed to the district court pursuant to Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure 106(a)(4) or to the Wheat Ridge Municipal Court pursuant to this subsection (f). For purposes of any appeal, the city manager's decision shall be final upon the earlier of the date of the applicant's receipt of the order or four (4) days following the date of mailing. Sec. 11-261. Display of license; transferability; change of ownership; change of corporate structure. (a) Any social club license issued pursuant to the terms of this article shall be prominently displayed at all times upon the premises for which the license was issued. (b) Licenses issued under this article shall not be transferable, sold, or leased except as provided herein. Any change in the partners of a partnership or in officers or directors of a corporate licensee or manager of a limited liability company holding a social club license may result in termination of the license of the partnership or corporation, unless such licensee, within thirty (30) days of any such change, files a written notice of such change accompanied by the application processing fee and the application investigation fee as required by subsection (b) of Section 11-252. Any such change shall be reported on forms provided by the finance division and shall require the names of all new partners of a partnership, officers, and directors of a corporation, and the manager of a limited liability company and any information as required by section 11-253. Approval or denial by the finance division of such transfer shall be upon the same terms as provided for in this article for the approval or denial of a social club license. (c) When a license has been issued to a husband and wife or to general or limited partners, the death of a spouse or partner shall not require the surviving spouse or partner to obtain a new license. All rights and privileges granted under the original license shall continue in full force and effect as to such survivors for the balance of the license. (d) Each license issued under this article is separate and distinct, and no person shall exercise any of the privileges granted under any license other than V 4020907 13 that which he holds. A separate license shall be issued for each specific business or business entity and each geographical location. Sec. 11-262. Manager; change of manager. (a) A registered manager shall be on the premises of a social club at all times that the social club is open and operating. A social club may have more than one (1) registered manager. It shall be unlawful for any person to work as a manager of a social club without first registering with the finance division. (b) In the event a licensee changes the manager of a social club, the licensee shall immediately report such change and register the new manager on forms provided by the finance division within ten (10) days of such change. The new manager shall be photographed and fingerprinted by the Wheat Ridge police department and shall be investigated pursuant to Section 11-255, above. The fee for investigation of a new manager shall be one hundred dollars ($100.00). The finance division shall cause the application to be investigated and shall approve or disapprove the change of manager, based on the applicable standards of denial in subsection (a) of Section 11-256 within ten (10) days of receipt of a complete application and fee. Sec. 11-263. Hours of operation. It shall be unlawful for a social club to be open for business or for the licensee or any employee of a licensee to allow patrons upon the licensed premises on any day from 2:00 a.m. until 7:00 a.m. Sec. 11-264 Security requirements. In addition to a registered manager, security guards shall be present at all times the social club is open and operating. Security guards shall be charged with observing the behavior of patrons to ensure that no violations of this article take place. There shall be one security guard present for every one hundred patrons. Sec. 11-265. Indoor activities. All activities at the social club shall be conducted indoors and no patrons shall be allowed to linger outside the social club unobserved or for longer than 15 minutes. Sec. 11-266. Lighting requirements. (a) All off-street parking areas and premise entries of social clubs shall be illuminated from dusk to closing hours of operation with a lighting system which provides an average maintained horizontal illumination of one (1) foot-candle of V4020907 14 light on the parking surface and/or walkways consistent with the requirements of chapter 26 of this Code. This required lighting level is established in order to provide sufficient illumination of the parking areas and walkways to help ensure the personal safety of patrons and employees and to reduce the incidence of vandalism and other criminal conduct. (b) All social clubs shall be equipped with overhead lighting fixtures of sufficient intensity to illuminate every place to which patrons are permitted access to provide an illumination of not less than two (2) foot-candles of light as measured at the floor level. Sec. 11-267. Noise; vibration. The licensee shall insure that noise or sound and vibration do not disturb the peace of the neighborhood in which it is located. It shall be unlawful for noise or sound to emanate from any social club if such noise or sound is louder than a normal conversation when heard at or inside the property line of property other than that of the social club itself. It shall be unlawful for a social club to emit vibration through the air or the ground if such vibrations are perceivable beyond the property line of the social club. Sec. 11-268. Notification of certain conduct in licensed premises. (a) Any licensee and its employees shall immediately report to the Wheat Ridge police department any unlawful act, disorderly conduct or assault committed on the premises. (b) Each licensee shall post and keep at all times visible to the public in a conspicuous place on the premises a sign to be provided by the city clerk's office which shall be in the following form: WARNING: The City of Wheat Ridge Police must be notified of all disturbances including disorderly conduct and assault which occur in this licensed establishment. (c) It shall not be a defense to a prosecution of a licensee under this section that the licensee was not personally present on the premises at the time such unlawful or disorderly act, conduct or disturbance was committed; provided, however, that an agent, servant or employee of the licensee shall not be responsible hereunder when such agent, servant or employee is absent from the premises. (d) Failure to comply with the requirements of this section may be considered by the finance division in any action relating to revocation, suspension or non- renewal of a license. A violation of this section is also a criminal offense, V 4020907 15 punishable by a fine or imprisonment, or both, as provided in section 1-5 of this Code. Sec. 11-269. Right of entry; inspection. (a) The application for a social club license shall constitute consent of the licensee and his agents or employees to permit the Wheat Ridge Police Department, the city building inspector, the health commissioner, any representatives of the fire department or any other agent of the city to conduct routine inspections of the social club during the hours the establishment is conducting business to insure compliance with the law. (b) A person who operates a social club or his agent or employee commits a misdemeanor of the first degree if he refuses to permit such lawful inspection of the premises. Section 2. Safetv. Clause, The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 14t:h day of ~v , 2007, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general- circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for June 11 , 2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m" in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED reading by a vote of to , this .2007. on second and final day of V 4020907 16 SIGNED by the Mayor on this 2007. ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk First Publication: May 17, 2007 Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: V 4020907 day of Jerry DiTullio, Mayor Approved As To Form Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney 17 ~~' .H",1', ~ 0 - D o "=," I"'l C'OLOR"'og ITEM NO: 4-. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ~~ ~ ,AI~$~ :"'_~',.. ~"p,.,tt""._,.",:t;" ........._'-!~ 1= ' ">" IILI /III 1~=k\J COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 14, 2007 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL 09-2007 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 5 AND 21 OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CONCERNING CERTAIN CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES IZI PUBLIC HEARING D BIDSIMOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date:) IZI ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING Quasi-Judicial: D City~1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Chapter 21 of the City Code generally regulates the issuance and administration of Municipal Contractors licenses. The section of the Code that addresses revocation of Municipal Contractors licenses is currently located in Chapter 5. The attached ordinance would move the paragraphs dealing with Municipal Contractor license revocations from Chapter 5 to Chapter 21. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: None STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Contractors obtaining permits to work in City right-of-way are required to hold a Municipal Contractors License. In June of 2006 the sections of the City Code that dealt with Municipal Contractors Licenses were moved from Chapter 5 to Chapter 21, Streets and Sidewalks, which regulates work in the City's streets. This change was initiated to consolidate subjects dealing with right-of way permits. Inadvertently, the section concerning revocation of contractor licenses was overlooked. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED:. None FINANCIAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Council Bill 09-2007 - An Ordinance Amending Chapters 5 and 21 ofthe City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Concerning Certain Contractor's Licenses, on second reading, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication." or, "I move to table indefmitely Council Bill 09-2007 - An Ordinance Amending Chapters 5 and 21 of the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Laws Concerning Certain Contractor's Licenses for the following reason(s) " Report Prepared by: Reviewed by: Tim Paranto, Director of Public Works Randy Young, City Manager Attachments: 1. Council Bill 09-2007 070514 CAP ord for contractor license change 5-14-7.doc CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER SCHULZ Council Bill No. 09 Ordinance No. Series of 2007 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 5 AND 21 OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CONCERNING CERTAIN CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws governs the issuance and revocation of various classes of license for contractors; and WHEREAS, Chapter 21 of the Code does not contain a procedure for revocation of certain contractor licenses; and WHEREAS, Chapter 5 of the Code contains references to the director of public works, which references should instead appear in Chapter 21, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. The introductory sentences of Code Sections 5-124(a)(b) and (c) are amended as follows: (a) Authority. The director of community development may suspend or revoke class I through class XIV licenses. +Re director of publio wy.~~e ~:::y ::usj::end or revz!~:: ::1:::3!: .1.1, through ::1::::::: ': lioenBoB. License suspension or revocation may occur when the licensee commits one (1) or more of the following acts or omissions: . . . (b) Procedure. When any of the acts or omissions as herein enumerated are committed by a license holder and the director ::f ;:>~:I::: worl::: e> ~i::9 director of community development, as :::;:;:I:3able, deems that such license shall be suspended or revoked, the procedure shall be as follows: (c) Emergency suspension. If the director ::f ;:>:!:E:: works or tRe director of community development finds that cause doe exist for suspension or revocation of a license, he may enter an order for immediate suspension of such license, pending further investigation. The license may, upon notice of such suspension, request an immediate hearing before the r.:aYef [director z~ P'}t':s-w::~I~e ::~ t!":{) director of community A I I ACHMENT 1 development ::5 +f:lisable} and the hearing shall be conducted in the manner prescribed by under subsection (b) above. Section 2. Subsection 5-125( a) of the Code of Laws is hereby repealed. Section 3. Chapter 21 of the Code is amended by the addition of a new section 21-22, to read: (a) Authority. The director of public works may suspend or revoke class A through C licenses. License suspension or revocation may occur when the licensee commits one (1) or more of the following acts or omissions: (1) Failing to comply with any of the licensee responsibilities as outlined in this Chapter. (2) Knowingly combining or conspiring with a person by permitting one's license to be used by such person, firm or corporation. (3) Acting as agent, partner, associate or in any other capacity with persons, firms or corporations to evade the provisions of this Chapter. (4) Committing any act of negligence, incompetence, or misconduct in the performance of the contractor's specific trade which results in a substantial threat to public health and safety. (5) Performing under his/her license in an unworkmanlike, careless, or reckless manner. (b) Procedure. When any of the acts or commissions as herein enumerated are committed by a license holder and the director of public works deems that such license shall be suspended or revoked, the procedure shall be as follows: (1) The licensee shall be notified, in writing, by or by personal service, at least seven (7) days prior to suspension or revocation. (2) Appeals of a license suspension or termination shall be made to the director of public works. Appeals must be made in writing within seven (7) working days of receipt of notice. (3) The hearing date shall be set within fourteen (14) days of receipt of the protest and the licensee shall be notified of the same. (4) When a hearing is conducted, the licensee and other interested parties may be in attendance. Upon 2 completion of the hearing, the director of public works shall take all evidence admitted under advisement and shall notify the licensee of their findings and rulings, either during the meeting or in writing by certified mail. (c) Emergency suspension. If the director of public works finds that cause does exist for suspension or revocation of a license, he may enter an order for immediate suspension of such license, pending further investigation. The licensee may, upon notice of such suspension, request an immediate hearing before the director of public works and the hearing shall be conducted in the manner prescribed by under subsection (b) above. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to o on this 14th day of May i 2007, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for June 11 , 2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day of ,2007. SIGNED by the Mayor on this day of .2007. Jerry DiTullio, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk Approved As To Form Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney First Publication: May 17, 2007 Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: 3 ITEM NO: & REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION "..=,~01 r.r-~~(_ ..) J_,l// I~B5'- COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TITLE: REQUEST FORAPPROV AL OF A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND A SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A DRIVE THROUGH FACILITY FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 3190 YOUNGFIELD STREET (CASE NO. WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08) IZI PUBLIC HEARING D BIDSIMOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date:) D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING Quasi-Judicial: [gJ ~t1lL D No Community Development Director ~. ~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Craig Dunham is requesting a Final Development Plan and a special use permit to allow a drive through facility for the property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street. The subject parcel is 29,578 square feet in size, The current zoning designation of Planned Commercial Development (PCD) allows a wide range of commercial retail and service entities. The site currently contains an abandoned gas station. An Outline Development Plan was approved by City Council in 2001. The Outline Development Plan included a range of allowed uses. The applicant wishes to construct a bank, one of the allowed uses on the Outline Development Plan. The applicant is also proposing a drive through on the property. The Outline Development Plan specifies that any drive through use will require a special use permit. The Final Development Plan shows a 4,477 square foot building footprint to be constructed on the property. Areas oflandscaping and parking are also shown in the Final Development Plan. This request relates to City Council goals of the City being prepared for growth and opportunities. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: Planning Commission heard the request for the Final Development Plan on May 17, 2007. Planning Commission recommended approval of Final Development Plan for the following reasons: 1. The Final Development Plan is consistent with the Outline Development Plan. 2. The Final Development Plan meets the standards established in Chapter 26, Article III of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Planning Commission did not review the special use pennit request. The Code of Laws specifies that any special use permit request starts as an administrative review. A ten-day posting period allows any neighbor to submit written objections. If any objection is received, or if any of the special use pennit criteria are not met, the Community Development Director will forward the request to City Council for review. Because the applicant is requesting approval of a Final Development Plan as well, the ten-day public posting period was forgone and the request was forwarded to City Council. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: None. AL TERNA TIVES CONSIDERED: Do not approve the request for Final Development Plan or the special use permit. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City has received a one-time application fee for the land use application. Building pennit fees and use taxes will be collected during construction. There is typically little revenue generated from a bank, as sales tax is not collected. RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: There are two requests associated with this application. Each request will require a separate motion. Final Development Plan Motion for Approval: "I move to APPROVE Case No. WZ-06-09, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: I. The Final Development Plan is consistent with the Outline Development Plan. 2. The Final Development Plan meets the standards established in Chapter 26, Article III of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. OR Motion for Denial: "I move to DENY of Case No. WZ-06-09, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: 1. ..." Special Use Permit Motion for Approval "I move to APPROVE Case No. SUP-06-08, a request for approval of a special use permit for the property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed drive through will not contribute to blight in the neighborhood. The development of the property will be an improvement over existing conditions. 2. The use will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety or welfare of persons in the area. 3. The building will be appropriately designed and all development standards listed on the Outline Development Plan have been met. OR Motion for Denial "I move to DENY Case No. SUP-06-08, a request for approval of a special use permit for the property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: 1. ..." Report Prepared by: Travis Crane Reviewed by: Alan White Attachments: 1. City Council Staff Report (with exhibits) TO: City Council CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLA.. m1.HG DIVISION STAFF REPORT CASE MANAGER: Travis Crane CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08/Dunham DATE OF MEETING: June 11,2007 ACTION REQUESTED: A request for a Final Development Plan and a Special Use Permit to allow a drive through facility. LOCATION OF REQUEST: 3190 Youngfield Street APPLICANT (S): Craig Dunham WI Davis Partnership OWNER (S): Walgreen Co. APPROXIMATE AREA: 29,578 sq. ft. (0.679 &C.) PRESENT ZU1\li\G: Planned Commercial Development (PCD) ENTER INTO RECORD: ( ) (X) ( ) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS DIGITAL PRESENTATION (X) (X) Location Map Subject Property All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. ATTACHMENT 1 City Council WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08/Dunham 1 I. REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a Final Development Plan and a Special Use Permit to allow a drive through facility (Exhibit 1, Letter of Request). The current Planned Commercial Development zoning designation allows a wide range of commercial uses. The applicant wishes to construct a 4,477 square foot bank, one of the allowed uses listed on the "1'1'''' led Outline Development Plan. The property contains an abandoned gas station, which ultimately would be removed. The property is bounded by Y oungfield Street to the west and West 32nd Avenue to the north, and is 29,578 square feet in size. The property was rezoned to Planned Commercial Development in 2001, in conjunction with the construction of the Walgreen's drug store. The gas station remained operational until 2006, when the underground tanks, gas pumps and canopy were all removed. The property is still owned by the Walgreen Corporation. The applicant has received proper consent from the property owners to pursue this application. II. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Final Development Plan (FDP) shows the site layout including building layout, parking areas, landscape areas and typical building elevations (Exhibit 2, FDP). The FDP conforms to the general layout and development standards as established in the Outline Development Plan. Existing Conditions The site currently contains an abandoned gas station. The gas station was operational until 2006, at which time the gas tanks, gas pumps and canopy were removed. A phase I environmental study was undertaken to determine the extent, if any, of subsurface contamination. The result of the report was that no further action was needed to remediate the site. The property has free access on West 32nd Avenue and on Y oungfield Street. These access points will be closed with the redevelopment of the site. Building Setbacks Page 2 of the FDP shows the site layout. The ODP specified minimum setbacks and maximum lot coverage for the property. The ODP states that a minimum setback of25 feet is required when adjacent to any right-of-way or residential properties, and all other setbacks shall be 10 feet. The building complies with the minimum required setbacks. The ODP specifies that a maximum of 80% ofthe lot may be covered by paving and structure. The FDP proposes 73% lot coverage, far below the maximum allowance. Landscaping The Final Development Plan details 27% landscaping on the property. The Outline Development Plan specified that at least 20% of the rezoned area (lots 1 and 2) must be landscaped. When the Walgreen's was constructed, approximately 18% of the Walgreen's lot was landscaped. As a result, the subject parcel must contain at least 22% landscaping, giving a total landscaped area of20% for lots 1 and 2. There will be 12 street trees located adjacent to right-of-way, surpassing the m;n;mum requirement of9 street trees. Adequate trees and shrubs are being shown on the landscaping page. Parking/Access The ODP references the Zoning Code'for parking standards. The Code requires a minimum of 1 space for each 200 square feet of building area, less any dedications. Based on this City Council , 2 WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08/Dunham requirement, a total of23 parking spaces are required. The FDP details 24 parking spaces to be located on the site. The existing curb cuts on the property will be removed. The property will gain access from West 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street via two access points on the adjacent property. When the properties were rezoned in 2001, cross access easements were established in an attempt to control access to both properties. The result is one access point on West 32nd Avenue and one on Y oungfield Street to serve both properties. Each access point is restricted; vehicles leaving the site may only turn right out onto eastbound West 32nd Avenue or northbound Y oungfield Street. There are areas of public dedication shown adjacent to West 32nd Avenue and Youngfield Street. These areas consist of real property to be dedicated to the City and easements dedicated to the City for the construction of public improvements. These areas of dedication will be conveyed by separate instrwnent at a later date prior to construction. It should be noted that a traffic generation letter was submitted which indicates that the proposed use will result in a decrease ofvehic1es per day as compared to the previous use, a gas station. Elevations Page 4 of the Final Development Plan shows some typical building elevations. These elevations are representative of the standards established on the Outline Development Plan. The Outline Development Plan requires that any building must be constructed of brick, glass, masonry and/or rock, and that the buildings on lots 1 (Walgreen's site) and 2 (snbject parcel) shall have consistent and cohesive design. The elevations shown meet the minimwn requirements established on the ODP. III. SPECIAL USE PERMIT The Special Use Permit will allow a drive through facility on the property. The applicant is requesting a drive through for a bank. The drive through will be located on the west side of the bank adjacent to Y oungfield Street. The cars will queue around the north side of the building. Typically, the Special Use Permit review process begins administratively with a ten-day public noticing period. Because the applicant was also requesting a Final Development Plan approval, the ten-day public notice period was forgone in lieu of City Council review. Staff has the following comments regarding the criteria used to evaluate a special use permit request: Per the Code of Laws Sec. 26-114 (D) before a special use permit is approved, the applicant shall show, and the community development director or city council shall fmd, the proposed special use: 1. Will not have a detrimental effect upon the general health, welfare, safety and convenience of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed use. The proposed use should not have a detrimental effect on the general health, safety or welfare of persons in the neighborhood. The development of the property will be an improvement over existing conditions. The traffic generated by the proposed use is less than .the traffic generated by the previous use. City Council WZ-06~09 & SUP-06-08/Dunham ' 3 2. Will not create or contribute to blight in the neighborhood by virtue of physical or operational characteristics of the proposed use. The proposed drive through facility should not contribute to blight in the neighborhood. The property currently contains a vacant building. The applicant proposes to construct a new building, which would be an improvement over the existing building. The site will be totally reconstructed - new parking areas and new landscape areas will be installed. The site is currently devoid of any landscaping. Additionally, there are large, continuous curb cuts on each street frontage that allow unregulated access to either West 32nd Avenue or Y oungfield Street. 3. Will not adversely affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air, water or noise pollution. The proposed drive through facility should not affect the adequate light and air, nor cause significant air pollution. The drive through will be located on the west side of the building, aW>vAimately 45 feet from Y oungfield Street. The drive through will accommodate one automated teller machine. 4. Will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, or unsafe parking, loading, service or internal traffic conflicts to the detriment of persons whether on or off the site. The request will not result in undue traffic congestion in the area. All of the City's parking requirements have been met. The property is accessed by two access points: one on West 32nd Avenue and one on Y oungfield Street. These access points also serve the property directly to the east. The traffic generated by the intended use is less than the traffic generated by the prevIous use. 5. Will be appropriately designed, including setbacks, heights, parking, bulk, buffering, screening and landscaping, so as to be in harmony and compatible with the character of the surrounding areas and neighborhood, especially with adjacent properties. The proposed building will conform to all development standards listed on the Outline Development Plan. The building facades will be of high quality materials. The building design meets the minimum requirements listed on the Outline Development Plan. The property will contain the minimum required landscape buffer along West 32nd Avenue. All setbacks are being met, and the building height does not exceed the maximum allowed on the ODP. 6. Will not overburden the capacities of the existing streets, utilities, parks, schools and other public facilities and services. The proposed use will not overburden the capacities of existing streets, utilities, parks, schools or other public facilities and services. All of the necessary agencies for public facilities and utilities were notified of this request the responding agencies stated that service can be provided to the p.vp.;..lj. 7. History of compliance by the applicant with Code requirements and prior conditions, if any, regarding the subject property. City Council WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08/Dunharn 4 The applicant has no history of compliance or noncompliance with the City of Wheat Ridge code requirements. 8. Ability ofthe applicant or any permitted successor-in-interest to continuously meet the conditions of the proposed permit. If conditions of an approved special use permit are violated, City Council has the authority to revoke the special use permit. 9. Other factors relevant to the specific application. There are no other relevant factors. IV. PLA.,11Hl_G COMMISSION ACTION Planning Commission reviewed the Final Development Plan request on May 17, 2007. The special use permit request was not reviewed at Planning Commission, as the Code of Laws specifies the special use permit process begins with an administrative review with appeal to City Council. Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Development Plan with no conditions. V. AGENCY REFERRAL All responding agencies have indicated that they can serve the property, and the applicant will bear the cost of upgrading any service to the property. A fInal drainage report and plan has been reviewed by the Public Works Department. While some minor issues need to be resolved, Public Works is satisfied that the applicant will detain all drainage onsite to be released at historic flow rates and will mitigate any negative impacts to surrounding properties. VI. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The required neighborhood meeting was held on April 12, 2006. There was 1 attendee at the neighborhood meeting. The attendee asked about access points and traffic. A meeting synopsis has been included as Exhibit 3. VII. STAFF CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDED MOTION(S): Staff concludes that the Final Development Plan conforms to the standards established on the Outline Development Plan. Additionally, the criteria for a Special Use Permit are being met. Each request will require a separate motion. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN OPTION A: "I move to APPROVE Case No. WZ-06-09, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: 1. The Final Development Plan is consistent with the Outline Development Plan. 2. The Final Development Plan meets the standards established in Chapter 26, Article III of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. OPTION B: City CO)lncil WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08/Dunham 5 "I move to DENY of Case No. WZ-06-09, a request for approval of a Final Development Plan for property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: 1. " SPECIAL USE PERMIT OPTION A: "I move to APPROVE Case No. SUP-06-08, a request for approval of a special use permit for the property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: 1. The Y."yv,ed drive through will not contribute to blight in the neighborhood. The development of the property will be an improvement over existing conditions. 2. The use will not have a detrimental effect on the health, safety or welfare of persons in the area. 3. The building will be "yy.vy.:ately designed and all development standards listed on the Outline Development Plan have been met. OPTION B: "I move to DENY Case No. SUP-06-08, a request for approval of a special use permit for the property located at 3190 Y oungfield Street, for the following reasons: 1. " City Council WZ-06-09 & SUP-06-08/Dunham 9 Oct. 3, 2006 IRIECCIEHVIEIDJ OCT I 62006 , -----., '-- .------ .- PROJECT NARRATIVE FirstBank of Wheat Ridge at 32'" Ave. & Y oungtield St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado Architect's Project No. 05235.00 Travis Crane, AlCP Senior Planner City of Wheat Ridge Planning D';.!'artment 7500W.29 Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Mr. Crane: Submitted herewith for your review is the Site Plan for a new branch bank of FirstBank, prepared by Davis Partnership Architects. This project is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of32'" A venue and Y oungfield Street. The existing site formerly served as a gasoline service station. Although the underground gasoline tanks have been removed, the existing retail building remains. The proposed site construction will consist of total demolition of existing buildings, structures and removal of all existing asphalt paving. Accommodations for the future reconstruction of 32" Ave. & Y oungfield St. intersection are provided. The proposed project is a one-story branch bank of FirstBank totaling approximately 4,460 square feet. Exterior building materials most likely will include a masonry veneer in combination with fixed glass in an aluminum storefront system, Access to the site will be provided by two existing curb cuts, one each on 32'" Avenue and Y oungfield St. Two existing curb cuts on Y oungsfield St. and one on 32" Ave, will be abandoned with this proposal. Drive lanes, drive through queuing and parking for vehicular traffic have been organized in such a way as to provide a safe and efficient circulation system for both drivers and pedestrians. Site planning and pedestrian concerns have been addressed and are in compliance with design guidelines and restrictions. This proposal is compatible with the surrounding area by offering a neighborhood financial service. The size and scale of the proposed building is similar in nature to other single use developments along 32'" Ave, & Y oungfield St. This submittal includes a scaled Site Plan, copy of the Property Deed, Landscape Plan, Drainage Report and Plan, Grading and Erosion Plan, a Trip Generationlfraffic Impact Letter, and this written narrative. We appreciate your review of these plans and look forward to hearing your comments. Sincerely, -- , Craig Dunh , AlA Associate cc: Stan Lee Gary Adams Kevin Scott FirstBank Holding Company Davis 'Partnership P.C., Architects Davis Partnership P.C., Architects Davis Partnership P.C, Architects Denver Office: 2301 Sle Vail Office: 0225 Main S EXHIBIT 1 '.861.8555 Fax 303.861.3027 60 Fa, 970,926.8961 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80215 City of Wheat Ridge Telephone (303)235-2846 Fax (303)235-2857 Date: 12 April 2006 City Staff Present: Travis Crane Location of Meeting: Municipal Building, 2nd floor conference room Property Address: 3190 Youngfield Street Property Owner: Walgreen Co. Property Owner Present? No Applicant: Craig Dunham, Davis Partnership Existing Zoning: Planned Commercial Development (PCD) Comp Plan Designation: Neighborhood Retail (NR) Existing use/site conditions: Abandoned gas station. Applicant proposal: Would like to apply for a Final Development Plan to construct a bank with a drive through. The request would also include a special use permit (to allow the drive through). Issues discussed: There was one neighbor in attendance. Questions were asked about access to the property, roadway improvements needed at 32nd and Y oungfie1d and if a traffic study would be submitted. The applicant felt it was a good plan and a good use of the property, and that it would improve existing conditions. EXHIBIT 3 ITEM NO: G. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION ~' 07;~-:-:'i' ~?;i Il~ '<v COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June 11, 2007 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL 10-2007, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 26-711 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS PERTAINING TOuu; REGULATION OF BILLBOARDS D PUBLIC HEARING D BIDS/MOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS IZI ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING (Date: June 1 L 2007) D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING Quasi-Judicial: D IZI Yes No ~JJ~ ~" CitYMan~n Community Development Director ~XECUTIVE SUMMARY: The proposed ordinance amends Section 26-711 of the Zoning and Development Code containing the billboard regulations of the City. The current regulations set the maximum number of billboards at 16 and establish maximum size, height, setback and spacing requirements. The regulations do not provide any guidance for the permitting of billboards. The proposed ordinance vests the current 16 billboard locations with the underlying property. All other size, setback, height and spacing requirements are not changed. The ordinance also repeals the B-1 District since it is no longer needed. Planning Commission recommended adoption of the ordinance. The proposed ordinance implements Council's strategic goals of planning for growth and opportunities by creating clear regulations for billboards. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION.:. The proposed regulations were presented to Planning Commission at a study session on April 5, 2007. At a public hearing on May 3, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the proposed ordinance with no changes. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: The proposed regulations were presented to City Council at a study session on February 20,2007. Council directed staff to bring the proposed amendments forward. The current billboard regulations were adopted in 1991 and were not revised when Chapter 26 was updated in 2001. The regulations establish two billboard districts -I) essentially adjacent to I-70 (called B-2) and 2) the remainder of the City (called B-1). (See Attachment 1.) The regulations required all billboards in the B-1 District to be removed by 1996. These have all been removed and this district is no longer needed. The regulations of the B-2 District set the maximum number of billboards in the district at 16. Height, setback, spacing, and maximum size standards are also established. Other than these standards, there is no guidance in the Code as to who "owns" the right to the billboard, when that right expires, who can apply for a billboard permit, and how permits are to be issued ifthere are competing interests for one billboard. Billboard companies typically enter into ground leases with a property owner and pay the owner rent for the right to have their billboard on that property. Leases are typically for 10 years. There have been two instances in the past three years where ground leases expired. Absent guidance in the Code, and with the assistance of the City Attorney, staff created a process and policies for dealing with this situation. This process essentially ties the right to the billboard to the ground lease. When the lease expires, so does the right to the biJlboard. That 16th billboard then becomes available for any company or land owner to pursue on a first come, first served basis. In cases where permit applications are filed at the same time for that 16th billboard, a lottery is held to determine who receives the right to the billboard. The process is a bit cumbersome and time consuming. The billboard companies have provided a letter of opposition to the proposed amendment. (See Attachment 2.) Essentially their recommended approach is Alternative #2 and would vest the right to a billboard with the permit holder (the billboard company), not the underlying property owner. A billboard location would become available when one company removed one of the 16 billboards. Staff does not see this alternative solving any of the problems with the existing "temporary" process. What constitutes removal- when everything is removed, even the caisson? When the face comes off? When the pole structure is removed? At what point during removal can another company submit a permit for the "available billboard location" -- a month in advance because they know the lease is expiring and the billboard will have to be removed? The company removing the billboard will argue one thing, the competing company will argue another and City staff will be in the middle - probably conducting another lottery. The City Attorney has provided an opinion of the proposed ordinance and the billboard companies' assertions. (See Attachment 3.) He opines that the proposed ordinance does not deprive the billboard companies of due process and is a legitimate approach to the regulation of billboards. One change has been made to the ordinance since it was presented at study session. The length of time a billboard location may exist without an active billboard use was increased from 60 days to 90 days. The following active billboard use definition was included: "active billboard use" shall mean that both of the following are continuously maintained on a permitted billboard location and in compliance with all city requirements: (1) a supporting pole or structure, and (2) a display facility capable of displaying message copy. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Several alternatives to deal with the lack of specifics in the Code were considered: 1. CodifY the procedures and policies used in the past two instances. 2. Vest the right to a billboard with the current permit holder (billboard company). 3, Vest the right to a billboard with the land where billboards are currently located. The proposed ordinance implements staff's recommended approach, Alternative #3. Vesting with the underlying property defines the 16 locations, allows the billboard companies to compete for the sites when leases expire, and adds value to the underlying property. It has the added advantages of taking staff out of the business of monitoring lease expirations and conducting lotteries to determine. who is granted the available billboard. Planning Commission requested that staff investigate how other jurisdictions permit billboards. None of the jurisdictions examined had a limit on the number of billboards. Wheat Ridge is unique in that regard. The results revealed that there are as many approaches as there are jurisdictions. Below is a summary ofthat information. . Arvada - Allowed only in B-4 zone district; no limit on number; considered principal use on lot. . Lakewood - Not mentioned in sign code. . Golden - Not mentioned in sign code. . Aurora - Allowed in certain commercial and industrial zone districts; no limit on number; cannot be visible from freeways or interstate highways. . Denver - Allowed, but under several spacing and visibility restrictions; no limit on number. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Because only 16 billboards are authorized by the ordinance and this number is not proposed to be changed, the revenue to the City from billboard permits will not change. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Council Bill 10-2007 on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, June 25,2007 at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and that it take effect IS days after final publication." Report Prepared by: Alan White, Community Development Director Attachments: 1. Map Showing Billboard Districts 2. Letter from Billboard Companies 3. Response Memorandum from City Attorney 4. Map of Current Billboard Locations 5. Council Bill 10-2007 OA19 NYOlllilHS t-:_~ . L \ I -""" Ul ~ :t: l; N J .. ~ 5 " % - ~% . 0 ~N t:~ ~i( ~i :>-j 0- -Ul u.... i( - to) - u. u. o .... C'ol J1 ch 08 ATTACHMENT 1 SCBS OUTDOOR .~"'4~mYr" MILE HIGH @rJ!J'[j'@@@[t1 ADVERTISING TO: FROM: DATE: RE: MEMORANDUM City of Wheat Ridge Mayor and City Council ~~iye~ CBS Outdoor, Inc., Lamar Advertising Co., Mile High Outdoor, In . :}5"'7 February 21,2007 Proposed Revision to Wheat Ridge Billboard Ordinance The Director Of Community Development has proposed an amendment to a portion of the Wheat Ridge Sign Code relating to billboards. The covering Memorandum states essentially that the existing ordinance should be changed to make the land upon which existing billboards currently exist the only permissible locations for billboards, now and in the future, The sole justifiCation is to relieve claimed administrative burdens on the Community Development Department. This proposal is unnecessary, and may well be unconstitutional. The change is unnecessary since the "problem" the amendment is designed to correct has only occurred once in the 16 years since the billboard regulations were passed in 1991. This "problem" is that two billboard companies applied for a new permit when one of the existing 16 billboards was removed, This "problem," however, was only created by the Director when, after discussions with only one billboard company (United Outdoor), he utilized new "draft policies," which "policies" ignored a much more obvious approach to resolving the issue. Unfortunately and also derived without discussion with or the benefit of the analysis by any company in the industry other than United, the Director's proposed solution,: (1) provides a total and undeserved windfall to those property owners lucky enough to have existing billboards on their property; (2) blocks all other property owners in Wheat Ridge's B-2 zone from having an equal opportunity to receive the income from billboard rentals; and (3) takes property without compensation from the existing billboard companies which are, as admitted by the Director in his Memo, "the current permit holders" and whose permit rights will be stripped and effectively given to the property owners. A much simpler solution is to provide that no new billboard permit be issued until one of the existing billboards has been physically removed or destroyed. ;Background: Most, if not all, of the existing 16 billboards in Wheat Ridge were erected pursuant to sign permits granted to CBS Outdoor, Lamar Advertising and 766292 ATTACHMENT 2 Mile High Outdoor (and two granted to United Outdoor, which is believed to be the major proponent of the proposed amendment). The billboards were erected on properties l?n which the billboard companies obtained land leases with property owners. In all cases, the billboards were erected, paid for and maintained by the billboard company. The billboards are the property of and owned by the billboard company, not by the landowner. Since most of these leases are for 10 years or more, they expire and billboards are removed ver'y infrequently. (We do not believe the Department has issued more than two or three new permits in the last 10 years.) CBS, Lamar and Mile High Outdoor have received no new permits ill the past ten years. Since the Wheat Ridge billboard code requires that a new sign permit be obtained before erecting or remodeling any billboard, and states that only 16 may exist at one time, one would have thought that a new permit could be issued only when the number of billboards drops to 15 - i. e., when an existing billboard has been physically removed. This is easy to determine administratively since the applicant would need to advise the Department which sign had been removed - a fact the Department can visually verify in minutes, if not by merely looking at before and after photographs. Nonetheless, when discussing only with United when a new permit could be issued, the Director.told it that the new permit could be issued ouly when the underlying lease expired. Not only is there no reference in the billboard code to leases (much less the permissible number of them), but this is a more difficult matter to determine administratively, because the Department has not required that leases on file with them reflect the expiration date. Thus, in one case in the last 16 years, the Department held a lottery, which it would not have done if it had used the removal of a billboard as the key factor. The Director's Prooosed Solution, First, the present proposed ordinance would allow the property owners who fortuitously have billboards on their property at this time the perpetual and exclusive right to maintain a billboard on their property. This light is not one they have ever had before or one they ever sought or paid for. Nonetheless, as noted in the Director's Memorandum, this gift will "add value to the underlying property." Yet this is value that they will gain solely because a billboard company previously paid for erecting and maintaining the billboard on their property.l Indeed, the windfall may be much larger and with less potential benefit to the City than even the Director imagines. Under the Director's proposal, the existing landowner has the the right to maintain the billboard on his property. The billboard can be moved to another location on that property. Furthermore, if the property is divided the 1 It is unclear why the proposed ordirlance limits the number of billboards to one per assessor's parcel number. At least one landowner already has two billboards in existence on one piece of property. Indeed, because of its location on the interstate highway, it could not be removed without payment of full just compensation. -2~ right remains with the portion of the property containing the billboard. (These additional provisions appear central to allowing the proposal to work.) Thus, one can fully expect that if this ordinance were adopted billboard companies will approach each present landowner and (a) ask them to allow the company to move the billboard to a comer or side of the property, and (b) pay the landowner a substantial sum to sell that sliver to the billboard company, which will then possess the right to own that billboard in that location forever without having to pay any further rent. Thus, it is likely that the only beneficiaries of the new ordinance will be the handful of existing landowners and the purchasing billboard companies. Second, not all billboards in Wheat Ridge have remained in the same location. This proposed ordinance will not only provide a windfall to the owners of existing billboard locations, it will obviously preclude all other property owners whose land is presently zoned for billboards (the only function of the B.2 zone), from ever having the opportunity to have a billboard built on their property and from receiving the significant lease revenues the billboard companies pay. Just as the existing landowners , are fortuitous financial beneficiaries of the new proposal, all other landowners in the B-2 zone will be gratuitously deprived of an equivalent opportunity to obtain any financial benefit. As noted above, even any new owners of the existing billboard locations are also likely to be foreclosed from any future benefit of the proposal. Finally, "current permit holders (billboard company)" will be stripped of their permits and their position without compensation. Their rights are being handed over to the landowners, whose ouly f'mancial participation has to be receive revenues from the billboard companies derived from property paid for, erected and maintained by the billboard company itself. The alternative proposal suggested above, has none of the foregoing problems, is administratively easy to administer (on me extremely rare occasions when the is'Sue may arise), and is completely consistent with the existing ordinance (which, incidentally, established the 16 billboard limit as a quid pro quo for the billboard companies to remove their billboards from throughout the remainder of Wheat Ridge withQut payment of compensation). When a billboard is removed or destroyed, the present code requires that a new permit be obtained to rebuild or replace it. It is highly uulikely that a billboard will be removed uuless the company's lease is being terminated. If the code provided (as has always previously been assumed to be the case) that anyone could seek a new permit when one of the existing billboards is removed or destroyed, then me only thing the Department would have to do is check to see that a previously existing billboard is gone, before issuing a new permit. If multipll? applications are filed on the same day, there is no problem with the holding of a lottery to determine which billbo,ard applicant should get one (although it would help if ouly one application per location were included rather than allowing the billboard companies and the landowners to file separate applications for the same billboard). It is noteworthy that the existing lawsuit does not challenge the procedures of the lottery that was held. Rather it asserts that no lottery was needed because the first permit application was submitted the day the lease was terminated and the billboard was removed, which was the day before any other applications were submitted. - 3 - " Our representatives would be happy to expand on the foregoing points and to answer any questions you might have. They are: Mr. Dan Scherer General Manager CBS Outdoor 4647 Leyden St, Denver, Colorado 80216 303-333-5400 Mr. Alan Weiss General Manager Mile High Outdoor Advertising '300 E. Hampden #324 Englewood, CO 80113 303.783.4800 Mr. Frank Bullock General Manager 12301 N Grant St Suite 240 Thornton, CO 80241 303-280-7000 -4- f',1u~RAY DAH,L , KUGr.B~S:NME'5TE:~ R ENg>...U 0 LLF-!'! MEMORANDUM TO: CC: Mayor and City Council Randy Young; Alan White FROM: Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney March 12,2007 DATE: RE: Correspondence from CBS Outdoor, et al. regarding Proposed Revision to Billboard Ordinance Council will have received a copy of a February 21, 2007 memorandum from CBS Outdoor, Inc., Lamar Advertising Company, and Mile Hi Outdoor, Inc., concerning the proposed revisions to the City's billboard ordinance. The billboard companies have raised a number of concerns they have with this ordinance. The purpose of this memorandum is to advise what steps, if any, the Council should take in response to that memorandum. My review of the memorandum leads me to conclude that there are no legal deficiencies in the proposed billboard ordinance, and that the reason it was suggested to the Council initially remains unchanged. The staff continues to recommend that it be approved. The billboard companies make the statement that they believe the ordinance is somehow unconstitutional, but do not really demonstrate why. Of course, any land use resulting regulation restricts the use of private property in certain ways, and unless the restriction removes all economic all use of the property, there is no "taking" in constitutional terms, In the case of the proposed ordinance, all of the billboards currently in place will remain, so long as the landlords and the billboard companies remain in agreement. No billboard permits are revoked. Billboard companies are free to negotiate with landowners for permission to maintain a billboard on those properties. The ordinance leaves the negotiating where it should be - between the landowners and the billboard companies. The billboard companies also have raised the concem that property owners will be inspired to subdivide off small slivers of their property in order to sell those parcels to ATTACHMENT 3 billboard companies. Of course, any such division of property would be a "subdivision" under the City's land use code and would only be approved if it met the requirements of the subdivision regulations, Also, as Council is aware, the present draft ordinance provides that any subdivision of property would not result in entitlement to an additional billboard on that property; the billboard entitlement would remain with the portion of the property upon which the billboard was in existence. The proposed ordinance is a legitimate exercise of the City's legislative authority to regulate land use matters. Because it is legislative, it will be subject to a public hearing before the City Council. I understand that a number of you have or will be contacted by the billboard companies for some form of private meeting outside of the legislative hearing process, While this is not prohibited, I see no reason for such meetings in light of the fact that there will be a public hearing on the ordinance. The three billboard companies who wrote the memorandum, any other billboard companies, and interested landowners and other citizens will have the full opportunity to express their opinions to the City Council at that time, Finally, the billboard companies' memorandum makes some allegations about the current lawsuit brought against the City by CBS Outdoor. In that case, CBS Outdoor does challenge the City's use of a lottery to process a particular billboard permit application, The status of this case is that the City won in District Court and CBS Outdoor has appealed. I advise you not to engage in a discussion with CBS Outdoor regarding the case while it remains on appeal. Please do not hesitate to contact me if this memorandum raises many questions. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. Ordinance No. Series of 2007 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE OF LAWS SECTION 26- 711.C.1, CONCERNING BILLBOARDS IN THE B-2 BILLBOARD DISTRICT AND REPEALING SECTION 26-711.B WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge, acting through its City Council, has authority pursuant to Article XX, Section 6 of the Colorado Constitution and, inter alia, C.R.S. 31-23-101 et sea. and 29-20-101 et sea. to regulate the use of land and structures thereon; and WHEREAS, pursuant to this authority, the City Council has previously enacted Section 26-711.C of the Code of Laws, concerning billboard signs in the B- 2 District; and WHEREAS, said Section 26-711.C currently permits a maximum of sixteen (16) billboards in the B-2 District; and WHEREAS, at the time of adoption of this Ordinance, the maximum sixteen billboards are in place in the B-2 District; and WHEREAS, the sixteen-billboard limitation has been difficult to administer in practice, owing to the difficulty in determining when individual billboard leases cease or are terminated; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that in order to eliminate these administrative difficulties, Section 26-711 should be amended to provide that the sixteen billboard locations presently in use in the B-2 District shall be designated as the only locations upon which billboards are permitted in the B-2 District; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this ordinance will preserve and protect existing property rights by recognizing the right of the property owners of the designated sixteen locations to continue to operate or lease the same for display of billboards; and WHEREAS the City Council finds that Code Section 26-711.B, concerning billboards in the B-1 District is no longer necessary as all billboards in the B-1 District were removed prior to January 1, 1996. ATTACHMENT 5 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Section 26-711.C.1 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws is amended to read: Maximum number allowed is sixteen (16), UNDER THE FOLLOWING RESTRICTIONS: provided ~ha!: :;xi:;ting billboard:; located v..ithin ths :3 1 :listrist :nay-----l3e rek:::;at::;;:l--t::; t:-;3 ::: 2 district re;;;,;:!I::;::;::; 3f th3 ;,\,,:-3;;i;n;.;;;, ffiffi1 t U-. (A) THE PERMITTED NUMBER OF BILLBOARDS AND PERMITTED LOCATIONS FOR SUCH BILLBOARDS WITHIN THE B-2 DISTRICT SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: ID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 APN 39-174-07-001 39-174-07-012 39-202-00-009 39-201-06-001 39-201-01-003 39-163-00-022 39-164-05-001 39-164-00-018 39-143-00-098 39-143-00-101 39-133-05-001 39-133-05-006 39-133-07-001 39-133-09-001 39-133-04-003 Address 4990 Ward Rd. 4800 Ward Rd. 12505 W. 44th Ave. 12351 W. 44th Ave. no address 4800 Partet S1. 10501 W. 1-70 FR N 10101 W. 1-70 FR N 8105 W. 48th Ave. 7881 W. 48th Ave. no address 4901 Marshall 81. 6400 W. 48th Ave_ 6161 W. 48th Ave. 6300 W. 49th Dr. Schedule # 109992 109982 042865 136582 406411 043805 042788 072159 085976 004073 194269 164345 003811 109721 136945 # of Billboards I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 2 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I (B) IN THE EVENT ANY OF THE ABOVE-LISTED LOCATIONS SHALL CEASE TO BE IN ACTIVE BILLBOARD USE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 CONSECUTIVE DAYS OR MORE, SAID LOCATION SHALL CEASE TO BE A PERMITTED LOCATION, AND THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SUCH BILLBOARDS AND LOCATIONS DESCRIBED AND PERMITTED HEREIN SHALL BE REDUCED ACCORDINGLY. 2 (C) AS USED IN THIS SECTION, "ACTIVE BILLBOARD USE" SHALL MEAN THAT BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING ARE CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAINED ON A PERMITTED BILLBOARD LOCATION AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY REQUiREMENTS: (I) A SUPPORTING POLE OR STRUCTURE, AND (2) A DISPLAY FACILITY CAPABLE OF DISPLAYING MESSAGE COPY. (D) A BILLBOARD MAY BE MOVED, SO LONG AS IT REMAINS ON THE PERMITTED LOCATION. (E) IN THE EVENT THE PARCEL CONTAINING A PERMITTED LOCATION is SUBDIVIDED, THE BILLBOARD AND THE ENTITLEMENT TO CONSTRUCT AND MAINTAIN A BILLBOARD SHALL REMAIN WITH THAT PORTION OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY ON WHICH THE BILLBOARD WAS SITUATED AT THE TIME OF SUBDIVISION APPROVAL. THE REMAINING PORTION(S) OF THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTY SHALL HAVE NO RIGHT TO PLACE OR MAINTAIN A BILLBOARD ON SUCH PROPERTY. (F) ALL BILLBOARDS SHALL CONTINUOUSLY BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS CHAPTER 26. Section 2. Section 26-711.B of the Code of Laws is repealed. Section 3, Figure 26-711.1 is hereby amended to delete the reference to the B-1 District. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of to on this day of . 2007, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for ,2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to ,this day of ,2007. 3 SIGNED by the Mayor on this ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk First Publication: Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: day of Jerry DiTullio, Mayor Approved As To Form ,2007. Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney 4 ITEM NO: I, REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION --?5~'~ ,~it~;;''l'0' ~< --< 1'ii}Ji: jillt~ ~~:0 n~ rll .D. -'--. COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June II, 2007 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL 11-2007: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, ENTITLED LICENSES, PERMITS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS REGULATIONS, SPECIFICALLY CODE SECTION 11-231 CONCERNING THE LICENSING OF MASSAGE TllliRAPISTS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROVISIONAL LICENSING OF MASSAGE ItlEHAPISTS o PUBLIC HEARING o BIDS/MOTIONS o RESOLUTIONS [gj ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (Date: June II. 2007) o ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING Quasi-Judicial: D Yes [gj No ~<::>....rcl City ManaJ. !" City Attorney EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Ordinance amends Chapter II of the Code of Laws by amending Section 11-231 to provide for the provisional licensing of massage therapists. Since the passage of the ordinance that required all massage therapists/massage therapy centers in the City to be licensed, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation has tightened its regulations concerning criminal background investigations. These investigations can now take up to 90 days to complete, This has left massage therapy centers in the City at a disadvantage in competing for qualified massage therapists. The amendment allows massage therapists to perform massage with a "provisional" license while the complete criminal background investigation is being completed. It requires a police review of police department records from Wheat Ridge, the applicant's city-of-residence, plus those communities in which the applicant has performed massage. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDATION: N/A STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: Many well-established massage therapy centers in the City have been negatively affected by the increased time that CBI investigations are taking under the new regulations. The review required for the issuance of a provisional license will provide the City with important information concerning the applicant's moral character and can be performed more quickly than the full criminal background investigation. The satisfactory completion ofthe review will allow the massage therapist to either practice massage therapy individually or become employed immediately with one of the City's massage therapy centers. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City will incur ouly modest additional expenses as a result of this amendment. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Council Bill 11-2007: An Ordinance Amending Chapter II ofthe Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Entitled Licenses, Permits and Miscellaneous Business Regulations, Specifically Code Section 11-231 Concerning the Licensing of Massage Therapists to Provide for the Provisional Licensing of Massage Therapists, on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, June 25, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and that it take effect upon adoption at second reading." or, "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill 11-2007: An Ordinance Amending Chapter 11 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, Entitled Licenses, Permits and Miscellaneous Business Regulations, Specifically Code Section 11-231 Concerning the Licensing of Massage Therapists to Provide for the Provisional Licensing of Massage Therapists for the following reason( s) " Report Prepared by: Gerald Dahl, City Attorney (303) 493-6670 Reviewed by: Patrick Goff, Deputy City Manager :t\.ttachments: 1. Council Billll-2007 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER Council Bill No. .:11 Ordinance No, Series of 2007 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, ENTITLED LICENSES, PERMITS AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS REGULATIONS, SPECIFICALLY CODE SECTION 11-231 CONCERNING THE LICENSING OF MASSAGE THERAPISTS TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROVISIONAL LICENSING OF MASSAGE THERAPISTS WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge Code of Laws requires that all massage therapists must be licensed by the City prior to offering or performing massage in the City for pay of any kind; and WHEREAS, the application process for a massage therapist license requires a criminal background investigation; and WHEREAS, the required criminal background investigation can take as long as three months to complete, which places massage therapy centers in the City at a disadvantage in competing for qualified massage therapists; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to amend Article X of Chapter 11 of the Code of Laws to provide for the provisional licensing of massage therapists; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Existing Section 11-231 of the Code of Laws ,is re-Iettered as subsection (a) and titled "License required; exceptions" and the section is further amended by the addition of a new subsection (b) to read in its entirety as follows: (B) PROVISIONAL LICENSE: THE CITY MAY ISSUE A PROVISIONAL MASSAGE THERAPY LICENSE TO ALL APPLICANTS WHO SUBMIT A COMPLETED MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND FEES AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 11-232 OF THIS ARTICLE. (1) ISSUANCE OF THE PROVISIONAL LICENSE SHALL BE BASED UPON A REVIEW OF THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT RECORDS, AS WELL AS THE RECORDS OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FOR THE APPLICANT'S RESIDENCE AND ALL JURISDICTIONS IN WHICH THE A I I ACHMENT 1 APPLICANT HAS PRACTICED MASSAGE WITHIN THE PAST 5 YEARS. SUCH REVIEW SHALL BE CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE THE APPLICANT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 11-233(1) OF THIS ARTICLE; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SUCH REVIEW SHALL NOT SUBSTITUTE FOR NOR NEGATE ANY FINDINGS OF THE FULL CRIMINAL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATION PROVIDED FOR IN SUBSECTION 11- 232(C)(1) AS PART OF THE APPLICATION PROCESS, (2) THE PROVISIONAL LICENSE SHALL BE VALID UNTIL THE PROVISIONAL LICENSEE'S APPLICATION FOR A PERMANENT LICENSE IS APPROVED OR DENIED BY THE CITY. a. APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF A MASSAGE THERAPIST LICENSE APPLICATION MUST OCCUR NO LATER THAN 180 DAYS AFTER THE CITY'S RECEIPT OF THE APPLICATION AND ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND FEES AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 11-232 OF THIS ARTICLE. THE CITY MAY EXTEND THE PROVISIONAL LICENSE PERIOD FOR UP TO AN ADDITIONAL 90 DAYS IF APPROVAL OR DENIAL OF THE APPLICATION IS DELAYED BEYOND THE 180 DAYS OR THE APPLICATION IS LOST, MISPLACED OR DESTROYED WHILE IN THE CITY'S POSSESSION. b. THE PROVISIONAL LICENSE IS SUBJECT TO ALL OTHER REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS ARTICLE. Section 2. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that. it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 3. Severabilitv. If any section, subsection or clause of this Ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption on second reading, as permitted by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of to on this 11th day of June, 2007, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for June 25,2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this 25th day of June, 2007. SIGNED by the Mayor on this 2007. day of Jerry DiTullio, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney First Publication: Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: ~~' WHEAr 1', ~ 0 - ~ u ~ C'O(ofi.sJ,) ITEM NO: <X, REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION i~$~' ":""0 c.~ Ilu WI COUNCIL MEETING DATE: June II, 2007 TITLE: COUNCIL BILL 12-2007: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING REAPPOINTING PRESIDING MUNICIPAL JUDGE CHRISTOPHER RANDALL AND INCREASING HIS BENEFITS AND HOURLY COMPENSATION D PUBLIC HEARING D BIDS/MOTIONS D RESOLUTIONS I:8J ORDINANCES FOR 1 ST READING (Date: June II, 2007) D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING Quasi-Judicial: D Yes I:8J No CitYM~ '1r City Attorney EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The current Presiding Municipal Judge's term of appointment ended on August 23, 2006. Presiding Judge Christopher Randall has continued to serve since that date. Charter Section 8.3 requires the Council to appoint municipal judges for terms of two years. Judge Randall requests reappointment, a small increase in hourly rate, and that his services agreement be amended to permit him to participate in certain benefit programs available to other City employees: short term disability; long term disability; worker's compensation; group term life insurance; employee assistance plan; retirement plan; official holidays; personal time off leave; extended sick leave; jury duty pay; and employee recreation program benefit. Charter Section 8.3 requires the judge's compensation to be set by ordinance. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES: In March, 2006 the City Council approved an amendment to the Judge's contract permitting him to participate in the City's health and dental plans. Permitting the Judge to also participate in the other requested plans available to other City employees (worker's compensation is already a provided benefit), and increasing his hourly rate to $87.15 will result in an approximate $16,973.00 increase in cost to the City annually. COMMISSION/BOARD RECOMMENDA nON: N/A ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED: Do not renew the current contract; put the work of municipal judge out to bid for requests for proposals; schedule a meeting with the Judge before acting. FINANCIAL IMPACT,: Increasing the Judge's hourly rate and allowing the Judge to participate in the additional benefit programs will result in an annual cost increase to the City of$16,973.00. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Council Bill 12-2007: An Ordinance Amending Reappointing Presiding Municipal Judge Christopher Randall and Increasing his Benefits and Hourly Compensation on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, June 25, 2007 at 7:00 p.m. in City Council Chambers, and that it take effect upon adoption." or, "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill 12-2007: An Ordinance Amending Reappointing Presiding Municipal Judge Christopher Randall and Increasing his Benefits and Hourly Compensation for the following reason(s) " Report Prepared by: Gerald Dahl, City Attorney (303) 493-6670 Reviewed by: Patrick Goff, Deputy City Manager Attachments: I. Memorandum from City Attorney 2. Letter from Judge Randall 3. Current municipal judge services agreement 4. Council Bill 12-2007 i'v1URR.AY DA}-,.iL KUEG~.Er-.4tvlS:I5T'ER RENAUD LLt::> MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Gerald E, Dahl, City Attorney DATE: May 16, 2007 RE: Contract with Presiding Municipal Judge The current presiding municipal judge, Christopher Randall was reappointed in 2004 for a term ending on August 23, 2006. Pursuant to Charter Section 8.3, the City Council shall appoint all judges for a term of two (2) years. Accordingly, Judge Randall's term has expired and the Council needs to either reappoint him or initiate a process to request proposals to fill the position, When Judge Randall was first appointed in 2002, the City had three municipal judges; as a result of resignations, Judge Randall is now the City's only judge. Judge Randall has requested reappointment, a small increase in his hourly rate, and change to his services agreement which would allow him to obtain additional benefits available to other City employees, specifically: . Short-term disability · Long-term disability · Worker's compensation . Group term life insurance · Employee assistance plan . Retirement Plan . Official Holidays . Personal time-off leave · Extended sick leave . Jury duty pay · Employee recreation program benefit A copy of Judge Randall's May 10, 2007 letter detailing his experience on the Wheat Ridge Municipal Court and his request is attached. Judge Randall has also asked me to convey to the Council that he is pleased to meet with the Council at any time, or for Council members to attend a court session, ATTACHMENT 1