The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-15-21City of W heat -Midge PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA April 15, 2021 Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on April 15, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. This meeting will be conducted as a VIRTUAL MEETING. No members of the Commission or City Staff will be physically present at the municipal building for this meeting. The public may not attend in person; however, the public may participate in these ways: 1. Provide comment in advance at www.wheatridgespeaks.org (comment by noon on April 14) 2. Virtually attend and participate in the meeting through a device or phone: • Click hereto join and provide public comment (create a Zoom account to join) • Or call 1-669-900-6833 with Meeting ID 935 1252 4139 and Passcode 152597 3. View the meeting live or later at www.wheatridgespeaks.org, Channel 8, or YouTube Live at https://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/view 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA (Items of new and old business may be recommended for placement on the agenda.) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —January 21, 2021 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda. Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) (continued on next page) Planning Commission Agenda — April 15, 2021 PUBLIC HEARING * A. Case No. WZ-21-02: an application filed by Noel Guerrero with Molson Coors for approval of a Specific Development Plan (SDP) amendment to allow a 40 -foot tall sound wall on property zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) and located at 10619 West 50' Avenue. 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS A. Upcoming Dates 10. ADJOURNMENT Public comment is welcome during any public hearing item. The standard procedure for a public hearing is as follows: Page 2 a. Staff presentation b. Applicant presentation — if applicable c. Public comment —time may be limited at the discretion of the Chair, often to 3 minutes d. Staff/applicant response e. Close public hearing f Commission discussion and decision Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Sara Spaulding, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of a meeting ifyou are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. City of WheatMidge PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting January 21, 2021 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair OHM at 7:00 p.m. This meeting was held virtually, using Zoom video -teleconferencing technology. As duly announced and publicly noticed, the City previously approved this meeting format in order to continue with normal business amid the COVID-19 pandemic and the related public emergency orders promulgated by the State of Colorado and the Wheat Ridge City Council. Before calling the meeting to order, the Chair stated the rules and procedures necessitated by this virtual meeting format. 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present: Melissa Antol Kristine Disney Will Kerns Ari Krichiver Daniel Larson Janet Leo Scott Ohm Jahi Simbai Commission Members Absent: None Staff Members Present: Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager Zareen Tasneem, Planner I Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner LEO and seconded by Commissioner LARSON to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried 8-0. Planning Commission Minutes 1 — January 21, 2021 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — December 17, 2020 It was moved by Commissioner DISNEY and seconded by Commissioner SIMBAI to approve the minutes of December 17, 2020, as written. Motion carried 7-0-1 with Commissioner LEO abstaining. 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) No one wished to speak at this time. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. MS -20-06: an application filed by Habitat for Humanity of Metro Denver, Inc. for approval of a minor subdivision to replat 3 lots into 4 lots on property zoned Residential -Two A (R -2A) located at on vacant land south of 4550 Miller Street. Ms. Tasneem gave a short presentation regarding the minor subdivision and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Ms. Tasneem added that no formal comments were received on Wheat Ridge Speaks, however, there was one inquiry received about the ownership of the property and timing of construction. Staff commented that Habitat for Humanity owns the land, and the applicant will be available to answer the question about construction. Kory Whitaker, Real Estate Manager, Habitat for Humanity Applicant Mr. Whitaker gave a brief video presentation regarding the Miller Gardens Subdivision. Commissioner KERNS inquired about the street improvements. Mr. Whitaker explained there will be a 6 -foot detached sidewalk and a 6 -foot tree lawn. The curb and gutter will be attached to the Montessori School's curb and gutter to the south. Commissioner DISNEY asked where the residents will park. Ms. Mikulak mentioned the applicant will have to comply with the zoning code parking requirements which is 4 parking spaces per unit. On -street, driveway, and garage parking spaces are provided and can all count towards meeting the parking requirement. Planning Commission Minutes -2— January 2— January 21, 2021 Commissioner SIMBAI asked why the parkland dedication fee could be different and inquired if another structure type could be built besides duplexes. Ms. Tasneem confirmed that single family homes or duplexes can be built on this property, based on the property's zoning, and Ms. Mikulak added that the parkland dedication is based on how many units are actually built and will be assessed at time of building permit. Commissioner SIMBAI asked if there is an update on the drainage report that is pending approval and if it is possible to move forward on this project without that report being finalized. Mr. Brossman said the drainage report is under review and is close to having all the civil plans completed. He added that the plan is close enough to finalization and approval to review the plat. Commissioner LARSON asked if the front doors of the duplexes will face Miller Street. Mr. Whitaker confirmed that the front doors will face Miller Street. Commissioner Larson also asked if the residents will be able to park on the pervious drainage areas. Mr. Whitaker explained that the residents should be able to park on the pervious parking pads without an issue. Commissioner ANTOL wanted to be reminded how the rules of fees in lieu of parkland dedication works. Ms. Mikulak explained the fees are used to improve existing parks and trail systems owned and maintained by the City of Wheat Ridge and not to always build more parkland. Commissioner KRICHIVER asked if there is any plan to regulate the intersection at Miller Street and W. 44"' Avenue due to the increased traffic in this area or this proj ect. Ms. Mikulak explained that Miller Street is a collector street and these duplexes will not make a significant impact on traffic in this area based on the existing volumes; no improvements to Miller or the intersections are triggered by this proposal. PUBLIC COMMENT Planning Commission Minutes -3— January 3— January 21, 2021 Nobody wished to speak. Chair OHM closed the public forum. Commissioner KRICHIVER said he is excited to see Habitat for Humanity in the Community and thinks this is a great project. Commissioners OHM and LARSON agreed and added the project will be beneficial to the area It was moved by Commissioner DISNEY and seconded by Commissioner KRICHIVER to APPROVE Case No. MS -20-06, a request for approval of a 4 - lot subdivision on property zoned Residential -Two A (R -2A) and located south of 4550 Miller Street, for the following reasons: 1. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. 2. The requirements of Article IV (Subdivision Regulations) of the zoning and development code have been met. With the following conditions: 1. Fees in lieu of parkland dedication shall be provided at time of building permit. 2. The developer shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with required security prior to recordation of the subdivision plat. Motion approved 8-0. B. Case No. WS -19-06: an application filed by Frank Zwolinski, Power Surveying Company, for approval of a 6 -lot subdivision for townhomes on property zoned Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) and located at 7661 West 41" Avenue. Ms. Tasneem gave a short presentation regarding the subdivision and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Ms. Tasneem also summarized and entered into the record the one comment received through Wheat Ridge Speaks. She described follow-up between the staff and the commenter and added that parking was reviewed during the site plan process and is not under review tonight. Frank Cefaratti, Owner 3605 Dudley Street Mr. Cefaratti gave a brief presentation regarding the Sweetridge subdivision. Planning Commission Minutes -4— January 4— January 21, 2021 Commissioner KERNS asked about on -street parking. Mr. Cefaratti mentioned that he has an after-hours parking agreement with the neighbor to the east who owns the medical office building. Commissioner SIMBAI asked to understand the roles of Mr. Cefaratti versus Frank Zwolinski who was listed as the applicant. Mr. Cefaratti said he is part of the ownership group, and Mr. Zwolinski is the surveyor for the subdivision who handled putting together the plat document. In response to a question from Commissioner SIMBAI about the townhomes being built before the subdivision case was submitted, Ms. Tasneem stated that townhomes are a use -by -right in the MU -C zone district. If a request for a subdivision had not been submitted, then the building would have stayed as rental apartments, maintained under one ownership, and the units could not be sold individually. Commissioner LARSON asked if the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) has been issued. Ms. Tasneem confirmed the CO has been issued, but the units cannot be sold individually until City Council has approved the subdivision and the plat has been recorded at the County. Ms. Mikulak added the units can be advertised for sale and go under contract, but no closing can occur until the plat is recorded. Commissioner Larson also inquired if there will be a limit to the number of these 6 townhomes that can be rented by the owners in the HOA regulations. Mr. Cefaratti said there will be no limitations in the HOA documents. He does not think this site will be one for attracting investors. Commissioner KRICHIVER asked if the Short -Term Rental ordinance is approved will this subdivision have to follow those limitations. Ms. Mikulak explained that, in a townhome situation, each owner can have a short- term rental unless otherwise precluded by the covenants of that property. Commissioner KRICHIVER asked what the price -point of the townhomes will be. Mr. Cefaratti said the units are 3 bedroom 3 '/2 bath and will run from $490,000 to $510,000. Commissioner OHM asked why in Tract D the easement does not go all the way to the property line. Planning Commission Minutes - 5— January 21, 2021 Ms. Tasneem explained it is related to the water lines getting to the individual units. Mr. Cefaratti added that the easement ends at the curb, and the area between the western boundary of that easement line and the western property line will all be landscaped. Commissioner OHM asked if there was a traffic count done. Ms. Mikulak said no traffic study was required and we expect there will be about 60 trips per day, based on standards from the ITE Manual for trip generation. Ms. Tasneem said the concerned citizen who submitted a comment on Wheat Ridge Speaks was referred to the City's Neighborhood Traffic Management Program. She added the concerns were more for the Yarrow Street neighborhood at large, versus for this particular development specifically. Commissioner OHM asked if this is considered a slot home development. Ms. Mikulak clarified that this is not a slot home development because the southernmost unit is oriented to W. 41" Avenue and doesn't meet the definition of a slot home simply by virtue of being sideways -oriented townhomes. Commissioner OHM also inquired if the deck of that front unit protrudes into the front yard setback. Ms. Tasneem mentioned that in the Mixed -Use districts there are build -to requirements and for this site, because it is zoned MU -C, it is 0-20 feet. A portion of the building structure has to be within the build -to area; there is no front setback. Public Comment Nobody wished to speak. Chair OHM closed the public forum. Commissioner DISNEY complimented Mr. Cefaratti on the construction of these units which has a very peaceful setting to it and hopes City Council entertains some traffic management in the area. It moved by Commissioner SIMBAI and seconded by Commissioner LEO to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WS -19-06, a request for approval of a 6 - lot subdivision on property zoned Mixed Use -Commercial (MU -C) and locate at 7661 West 41' Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. 2. The requirements of Article IV (Subdivision Regulations) of the zoning and development code have been met. Planning Commission Minutes -6— January 6— January 21, 2021 With the following conditions: The developer shall record documentation establishing a homeowner's association for the site concurrently with the recordation of the subdivision plat. Motion carried 8-0. 8. OLD BUSINESS Commissioner OHM complimented staff on the word crafting of a condition for a previous case heard in December. 9. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ms. Mikulak confirmed there will not be a Planning Commission meeting on February 4. 2. Ms. Mikulak mentioned staff is about to launch the 2°d and final round of the Let's Talk conversations for the Bel Aire and East Wheat Ridge neighborhoods and encouraged residents to participate. 3. Commissioner ANTOL asked about the status of the 44ffi Avenue Corridor Plan. Ms. Mikulak mention a contract was awarded a year ago but has been put on hold due to COVID budget cuts and is still on the list for the future. She also mentioned there is a Lutheran Hospital Master Plan in the works to consider the future of the 100 -acre site due to SCL purchasing property at the Clear Creek Crossing site: 10. ADJOURNMENT r It was moved by Commissioner DISNEY and seconded by Commissioner LARSON to adjourn the meeting at 8:30 p.m. Motion carried 8-0. Scott Ohm, Chair Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes January 21, 2021 7— ♦�4I Wh6atBiid e g CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT REVIEW DATES: April 15, 2021 CASE MANAGER: Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-21-02 / RMBC Sound Wall SDP Amendment ACTION REQUESTED: Request for a Specific Development Plan (SDP) amendment to allow a 40 -foot tall sound wall on property zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 10619 W. 50th Ave. APPLICANT / OWNER: Noel Guerrero, Molson Coors APPROXIMATE AREA: Approximately 1,194,590 square feet (27.42 acres) PRESENT ZONING: Planned Industrial Development (PID) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Employment ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) DIGITAL PRESENTATION Location Map (subject site outlined in red) Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST This request is for approval of a Specific Development Plan amendment for a 40 -foot tall sound wall on property zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID). This sound wall is proposed to surround the existing oxygen plant on the north side of the property and is in response to complaints from the adjacent neighborhood. Pursuant to Section 26-302 of the Municipal Code, there are two distinct steps in establishing a planned development: 1) approval of an outline development plan (ODP) that establishes the planned development zoning designation, permitted uses, underlying development parameters, and general design concepts; and 2) approval of a specific development plan (SDP) to provide specific site plans, building elevations, and civil documents. An ODP and SDP were both established for the site by way of a Final Development Plan dating back to 1976, and heavy industrial uses are permitted. Final Development Plans were replaced with the Planned Development ODP and SDP process in 2012 per Ordinance 1515. As such, the original Final Development Plan is treated the same as either the ODP or SDP as applicable to future amendments. Since the proposed sound wall relates to the site-specific planning, it must follow the SDP amendment process pursuant to Section 26-307 of the Municipal Code. It does not qualify for administrative review since walls and fencing were not contemplated beyond what is allowed by the fencing code regulations (Section 26-603 of the Municipal Code), which only allows walls or fences up to six feet in height. Given the size and purpose, staff has reviewed this as a structure, not a divisional wall or fence. The criteria for review and analysis of the SDP are provided in Sections III and IV below. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY The subject property is zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) and is located in the Coors Planned Industrial Development, a major industrial and employment hub in the city, near the southwest corner of Miller Street and Ridge Road. It contains the Praxair Plant (aka Rocky Mountain Bottling Company) within Lot 1 of the Rocky Mountain Bottling Company Subdivision. The lot contains four (4) industrial buildings, and measures 1,194,590 square feet (27.42 acres) in size. The surrounding area has primarily industrial uses. Properties to the south, west, and east are also zoned PID and contain a mix of industrial uses. Properties to the north, across Ridge Road, are zoned PID, Planned Residential Development (PRD), and Agricultural -One (A-1), and contain a Fire Station, single-family homes, and government facilities. A copy of the approved Final Development Plan (FDP) for the subject property is attached, which was originally approved by City Council in 1976, with 10 subsequent amendments, and titled "Coors Planned Industrial Development' r'xhibit 3, Final Development Plan). This plan is included to provide context when reviewing the SDP Amendment. Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment While the site has been utilized as a manufacturing facility for decades, noise complaints have increased in the last few years. The property owner completed improvements on the site, some of which were required for compliance with federal environmental regulations. The applicant has worked with neighbors and the City Council to address noise complaints, and the proposed sound wall is one of the mitigation solutions. III. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Attached is a copy of the proposed SDP amendment, which includes 4 sheets (Exhibit 4, Specific Development 01 endmen : • Sheet 1: Cover page — This page includes signature blocks, legal description, and general reference information, as well as the development standards established per the original FDP. • Sheet 2: Site plan — This detailed plan shows the site layout, including building location, parking, water detention, easements, and the site data table. • Sheet 3: Enlarged site plan — This detailed plan shows more specific details of the proposed sound wall. • Sheet 4: Sound wall elevations — Includes building materials matrix and legend. The scope of the Planning Commission review is focused on the sound wall as a structure, and the features of the wall are summarized below: Setbacks, Height, and Lot Coverage The proposed sound wall meets the requirements for a 25 -foot setback along the northern (rear) property line, and 10 -foot setbacks at side property lines. A setback of approximately 39 feet is provided along the northern property line, and over 200 feet of setback is provided at side property lines. The sound wall is proposed at 40 -feet in height, where a maximum of 50 -feet is allowed for buildings per the PID zoning. The PID allows for a maximum of 85% lot coverage. A total of 66.35% of lot coverage is proposed. Architectural Standards The PID requires all fencing to be in conformance with Section 26-603 of the Municipal Code, which allows fencing or divisional walls up to 6 -feet in height. The proposed sound wall is not considered a divisional wall and therefore is not subject to the fencing and wall requirements and is instead proposed to substantially comply with the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) and development standards applicable to buildings and structures. The PID specifically refers to architectural design being subject to compliance with the "streetscape and architectural design manual," which was the predecessor to the Architectural and Site Design Manual's (ASDM) and Streetscape Design Manual. Based on the location of the sound wall and its proximity to and visibility from a public street, the current ASDM shall apply. The ASDM includes architectural standards for Heavy Commercial/Light Industrial buildings, including requirements pertaining to fagade design, materials, transparency, and screening. The sound Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment wall substantially meets the ASDM standards, but exceptions are being requested related to requirements for: • Emphasis on primary entries • Variation in roof form • Limitation on the use of metal panel as a material • Material variation; and • Transparency Staff is supporting the proposed design and exceptions from the ASDM because of the unique purpose of the sound wall: first, it is a structure and not a building, so it not subject to the strict provisions of the ASDM in the same way as a building; and second, the wall is necessary to achieve noise mitigation, and it cannot be structurally altered to such a degree that its functional purpose is compromised. Further details on the requested exceptions can be found in the SDP criteria analysis below, as well as the applicant's letter attached (Exhibit 6, Applicant Letter). The wall achieves the intent of the ASDM by providing base and cap articulation, variation in material and color, and the articulation of bays through columns and panels. The PID also calls for use of earth tones, which is being met. The sound wall does not trigger any right-of-way improvements. Therefore, the Streetscape Design Manual does not apply to the subject project. Landscaping The PID calls for a minimum of 20% landscaping where 34.45% of the site is landscaped. Overall compliance with the landscaping plan of record is achieved on site. Typically, landscaping is required at the base of walls to soften their appearance. Due to grades, the base of the wall is not visible from Ridge Road so typical requirements for landscaping at the base of walls would not be beneficial. A cross-section diagram showing the view from Ridge Road has been provided ILxhibit 4, Specific Development Plan Amendment and Exhibit 5, Sound Wall Exhibits). Noise The City's noise regulations are not located in the zoning code, but rather are established in Section 16-103 (Unreasonable noise; disturbing the peace). This code section includes limitations on unreasonable noise for all properties in the City and specific limits for industrial land uses. It also outlines a permit process for special exceptions, and the applicant is pursuing a noise permit, which is scheduled to be reviewed by City Council on April 12, 2021. Staff will report on the results of that decision at the Planning Commission public hearing. Compliance with the noise regulations are not within the purview of the Community Development staff or Planning Commission, however, a noise engineering analysis has been provided to prove that the sound wall design will achieve the intent to mitigate noise. IV. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN CRITERIA Criteria for the review of SDP documents is provided in Section 26-305.D. Staff has provided analysis of these criteria below. Planning Commission shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which the criteria have been met. Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment 1. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the purpose of a planned development as stated in section 26-301 of the zoning and development code. The intent of a planned development is to permit well-designed, innovative developments which may not be feasible under a standard zone district and to promote flexible and efficient use of land. Other general purposes of a planned development are: • To promote the efficient use of land to facilitate a more economic arrangement of building, circulation systems, land use and utilities. • To promote compatible development with adjacent commercial, residential and/or industrial land uses through proper land use transitions and buffering techniques. • To promote conformance with the adopted comprehensive plan, established policies and guidelines for the area and for the community. Staff has concluded that the SDP is consistent with these goals by supporting the employment base in the area per the comprehensive plan, promoting an efficient use of the site, and adding a sound wall that supports more compatible development with adjacent land uses in response to noise complaints. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 2. The proposed specific development plan is consistent with the design intent or purpose of the approved outline development plan. Per the established FDP, the character of this development shall reflect the industrial nature of the intended use. Acceptable materials shall be concrete, metal or glass. Building colors shall be earth tones. The amended SDP is consistent with the intent and character statement of the established FDP and mitigates impacts on the adjacent uses. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 3. The proposed uses indicated in the specific development plan are consistent with the uses approved by the outline development plan. The proposed use is consistent with the allowed uses from the FDP and is being proposed by the same owner that originally proposed the FDP. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 4. The site is appropriately designed and it consistent with the development guidelines established in the outline development plan. The SDP amendment is consistent with the development guidelines of the FDP in all respects including height, setbacks, building coverage, landscaping, parking, lighting, fencing, and signage. The sound wall meets the intent of the ASDM, with some relief as appropriate for a structure (as opposed to a building) and in order to maintain the wall's structural integrity to effectively mitigate sound. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment 5. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the subject property, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. The property contains an established industrial use and services are provided for. No objections or concerns were raised by utility agencies with this SDP amendment. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 6. The proposed specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual, Streetscape Design Manual, and other applicable design standards. The SDP amendment meets the intent and substantially meets the requirements of the ASDM by providing for a higher level of fagade detail and articulation. Because of the nature of the proposed improvement being a sound wall which cannot be structurally altered to a degree that minimizes its function and the fact that it is a unique structure rather than a building or fence, the applicant has requested exceptions to the following requirements of Section 4.2 of the ASDM: • Emphasis on primary entries - The primary entry shall be emphasized through at least two of the following: Changes in wall plane or building massing, differentiation in material and/or color, higher level of detail, or enhanced lighting. • Variation in roof form - Roof forms and parapet heights should be varied, and where appropriate, should emphasize the fagade articulation and variation of building materials. Roof forms over 100 linear feet shall incorporate at least two of the following: changes in roof or parapet height, decorative cornice or eave treatment, differentiation in material and/or color, or changes in roof type, such as hipped or gabled roof lines and modulated flat roof lines. • Limitation on the use of metal panel as a material - Each facade shall contain at least 40% of one or more of the following materials: brick, stone, integral colored textured concrete block, hard coat stucco, synthetic brick and masonry materials, or terra-cotta. The following materials are allowed but may not exceed 60% of any facade: smooth -faced concrete masonry units (cmu), exterior insulating finishing system (EIFS), metal panels, or articulated concrete panels. • Material variation - Each facade shall include at least three different materials. A change in color or texture may count as one material variation. Windows, canopies, and doorways will not count as a change in material. • Transparency - Each facade shall be at least 15 percent transparent. Staff finds that the requirements pertaining to emphasis on primary entries, variation in roof form, and transparency are not applicable to the proposed sound wall, but some variation is needed to meet the intent of the ASDM and to help achieve visual interest. The sound wall is proposed to be comprised of all metal panel as needed for structural integrity. That said, the intent of the ASDM has been achieved by providing two panel types with repeating structural elements that vary in depth by at least one foot with three different colors incorporated, all in earth tones as required by the PID. It also has a cornice top which extends outward from the main body of the wall. The applicant contends that adding materials other than metal panels to the noise wall would significantly impact the structural integrity of the wall, as well as prevent it from achieving its noise reduction purpose. Staff supports the requested exceptions and finds that the SDP amendment meets the intent of the ASDM. Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment The sound wall does not trigger any right-of-way improvements. Therefore, the Streetscape Design Manual does not apply to the subject project. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. VII. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the SDP amendment request. Specific referral responses follow: • Engineering Division: No objections. • Building Division: Will review all building permits in coordination with the Planning Division and Engineering. • Police Department: No objections. • Arvada Fire Protection District: No comments. • Valley Water: No comments. • Xcel Energy: No comments. • Century Link: No comments. • Comcast: No comments. • Clear Creek Valley Sanitation: No comments. • City of Arvada Planning Department: No comments. VIII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded that the proposed Specific Development Plan amendment is consistent with the planned development regulations, with the goals and policies of the City's guiding documents, and with the Coors Planned Industrial Development. Because the requirements for an SDP have been met and the review criteria support the SDP, a recommendation for approval is given. X. SUGGESTED MOTIONS — SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-21-02, a request for approval of a specific development plan amendment on property zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) located at 10619 W. 501h Ave. for the following reasons: 1. The specific development plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of a planned development, as stated in Section 26-301 of the City Code. 2. The specific development plan is consistent with the intent and purpose of the outline development plan. 3. The proposed uses are consistent with those approved by the outline development plan. 4. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. 5. The specific development plan is in substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the outline development plan and with the City's adopted codes and policies. With the following conditions: Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment 1. Prior to construction, a building permit shall be subject to review and approval by staff and shall be consistent with the representations depicted in the SDP. Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-21-02, a request for approval of a specific development plan amendment on property zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) located at 10619 W. 501h Ave. for the following reasons: 2. ... 3. ... Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment wf' �P�igv Ge rapM1 c Inlarmd on Systms L aentl QSable¢ Property 1 iWhmt Rope ON Gm6 EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL (2018) C eNo. W 21-021R BCSa d Wall SDPAmWment 9 EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP O'w��, mix=Informy� C o9raphc don SYs9mns l aentl N QSuble¢ProPerry L.31 Wheat R09e QN nrttirs y I/ DAVE L _ D A } .' 0004 S6 r`r - �'- Je � a " - - -50TH-AVE- r . J / 0 r� ... QQ r+f Case No. WZ21-021B BCSovd dull SDPAmendmarc 10 EXHIBIT 3: FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (Attached) Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment 11 q IMIMM MAN 061LI,p r�4 qvzt,1,S6,t1 3333 3333 3333... 3333 3333. 3333 .. 7,17 d! F r H IJ 'NEU I SHEET 1 OF - O HLM N STRIAL-D VEL IBOOK_PAGE INDUS` OPMENT -ORS FILINGS NO. 1 & 2, AMENDMENT# 10 i RErEPTlOf4 NO. DATE OF RECORDING FINAL DEVELOPMEN T PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE VICINIT11Y MAP INCLUDING" APART OF TALMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILING NO. 1, APART OF THE N,W,114, S.E.1/4 AND APART OF THE S.W.1/4, N E. `114, ALL IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, T RANGE 69 WtST OF I HE SIXTH P.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO. 0 SHEET 1 OF 6 IlL l)l� AREA LEGAL DESCRIPTION ED USES ALLOW E CITY CERTIFICATION ORIGINAL P I D FINAL DEVELOPMEN T PLAN BOOK 14 PAGE 18 REC;1:FTlON No. 00947892 DATE 3,118176 COORS BREWING COMPANY, BEING THE OWNER OF THE 'A. PROPERTY OF 2B.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS DESCRIBED AS F LLOWS: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS: SEC, 26-302 B. APPROVAL THIS 'jf�DAY OF !'�LLcn_W2011 By THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE P I D AMENDMENT No, 4,1 BOOK 36 PAGF. I 2 x OF PLANNED FILING NO. 1, A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: RECEPTION No. 8401 r574 2 LOT 1 COORS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT DATE� 2127184 -PRWEC LOCA 71101N-�- _F TUN v PORTION OF MILLER STREET R -OF-WAY AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 89, RIGHT MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: SEC, 26 -302 H, ATTEST L MILLER. ST UA01SON W 50T "AVE UlK�5 PAGE 16 UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 86051871, AND A PORTION OF LOT 8 OF ARVADA RIDGE FINAL PLAT, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, LANDSCAPING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20% OF THE TOTAL LOT P I D AMENDMENT No. 2 TY OF502) RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, C OUN I AREA" Sr(SECTION 26 CI CLERK MAYOR BOOK 89 PACE 16 RECEPTION No. 86051871 I I F11_E I A 7 ,�J, r,PARTICULARLY JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MORE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: ALL PARKING SHALL BE IN 'CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-501 5;46f86 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS P I D AMENDMENT No. 3 �il'11119, T, t ,, A PORTION OF TALMAR INDU�_T JAIL PARK, FILING NO, 1, AND A PORTION R CT L J1l`I, N -E 1-1/4, SE ION 16, OF THE N.W. !/4, &E. 1/4, AND THE S.W, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WESTl 61H., P,M,, WHEAT RIDGE, T TI ALL EXIERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WfFH SEC ON ODP BOOK 70 P�GE 5 RECEPTION No. 93127559 26-503 OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS." DATE 8/20/93 PThRrMICATI COLORADO, DESCRIBED FOLLOWS; COMMON !NG AT THE SZ. CORNER, SCRIBED AS F' CbMMUNITY _DEVELdPMENJ RECTOR 'W 44,,A� qfo, N.W, 1/4, S.E, A14 OF SAID SECTION 16, THDICE S89�30'02')Y ALONG "ALL FENCING SHA➢LL BE IN CONFORMANCE WIT] SECTION 26-603 v P I D AMENDMENT No, 4 THE SOUTH LINE OF IFIE N,W. 1/4-� S1, 1/4, 30,00 FEET TO THE TRUE i rF T POINT OFF BEGINING, THENCE CON TINUING S,809 30'02"W, 0121,39 r_F_ I OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS�" ODP BOOK 105 PAGE 47 RECEPTION No� F1063350 WHEA17 RIDGE, CC) 1 72 FT, EAST OF THE S.W. MORE OR LESS TO A POINT THAT IS 376� ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE Vit OF THE I DATE 5130ioo 1 /,/+, T 10 1 � CORNER, N.W. 1/4, S.E. HENCE NOR -IH AND PARALLEL T THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS." NORTH -SOUTH CENTER- LINE OF SECTION 16, 1323-12 FEET , TO A I I[ POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT -017 -WAY LINE OF THE COLORADO AND I ll 3333. P I D AMENDMENT No. 5 415 EXPLANATIU13N OF AMENDMENT SOUTHERN RAIL -ROAD, THENCE N74'40'181 ALONG THE SAID SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY 11 IRE, 642,61 FEET To THE N.W. CORNER OF SAID ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL TO Tu- APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STREETSCAPE UUNTT CLERK I ANDKECORDERS CERTIFICATE ODP BOOK u PAGE 64 RECEPTION No, F1490796 DATE 51 AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN MANUAL." !3102 AMENDMENT TO ADD ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT A14D OXYGEN PLANT TALMAR NDUSTRjAl PARK,FILING NO. S012`571 ALONG THE INCLUDING BUILDINGS 218 AND 22B, AND EXPANSION OF SITE THE WEST LINE OF SAID INDUSTRIAL PARK 389.34 FEET, THENCE CIRCULATION' ROAD AS.INDICATED ON THE SITI: PLAIN. z _r iOUNDARY OF -Tj�- MILLER _9 1717 Wl� T E 1\189'33'01"E, 3B3�2 ELI, TO T HE "� - -10 ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK I P I D AMENDMENT No, 6 ODPBOOK 118 PAGE 50 1'�, THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY; THENCE ALONG A NON -TANGENT CURVE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA OF 171911", A RADIUS OF 770-00 FEET, AND CHARACTER ONF DEVELOPPMENT D AND REr'0RDER OF JEFFERSON �OUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO ION RECEP TION No, F1620499 DATE 12/04 THIS DAY OF 20 AT 19 AN ARC LENGTH OF 232.76 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING S8 -5147"T -1 JV_kLm -------- O'CLOCK__A_+_A I 1231,88 7 FEET THENCE SO'12'10"W, 2J6.62 FEET, THENCE ALONG A FEET: H �, m THE CHARACTER OF TH'IS DEVELOPMENT SHALL REFLECT THE --------- 40,1 TANGENTAL 'CURVE TO TH� RID -IT WITH A DELTA. OF 1711'391'50", A RADIUS INDUSTRIAL NATURE OF THE INTENDED USE, ACCEPTABLE MATERIALS P I D AMENDMENT No, 7 FILING OF 6-170.00 FEET AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 2-05-56 FEET; THENCE SHALL BE CONCRETE, METAL OR GLASS. BUILDING COLORS SHALL BE No. 2 OPD D S17,271'39"W, 164.38'; THENCE ALONG A TANGEENTAL CURVE TO THE LEFT EARTH TONES. REG No. 2006151563 DATE 121215106 HAVING A DELTA OF 1'10'49". A RADIUS OF 730.00 FEET AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 15,04 FEET; THENCE S8947'48`W, 3U.00 FEET; THENCE LINE OF MIL' R STREET FILING No, 2 FDP REC No. 2006151564 DATE 12/28106 r F LE S0*12121 ALONG !H`- WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY 228,79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION ONWNER'S CERTIFICA71 E N W RK AND RECORP61tv Y. ELEX TKE RtSN 240 53, P I D AMt -NDMENT No. 8 8 A PACE 73 IND BOOK 80, PAGE 16 OF T DESCRIBED IN BOOK Z: . U m IHE RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, CONTAINING 28.74 ACRES, T E BELOW SIC-NED OWNER(S�, OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) MARA FILING Nos, 1 and 2 FDP MORE OR LESS. THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY RECNo. 201019957 DATE 12130110 DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS PLANNED DLVELOPMENT REVISED 08121/17 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS P 1 D AMENDMENT No- 9 CONTAINED iN THIS PLAN, AND AS MAY OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY FILING Nos, I and 2 FDP U_ CA"EtE HISTORY NUMBERS- `R'S CERTIFICATE SURVEYU I LAW, 1 (WE) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND APPROVAL REVC No, 2011042C,118 5 REZONING OF THIS DATE 04129/11 FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY WZ-77-16, WZ-83-36. WZ-85-28, WZ-93-4, WZ-99-1 `WZ-06-01, A 11- --------- DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFO ATION T. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONIV ARISE AND ACCRUE RICH, -I INDEX OF DOCUMENTS3 P I D AMENDMENT No. 0 WZ-02-D4, WZ-02-11, WV -06-01, MS -06-05, SHO REIN 0,11 THE (FDP FILLINGS NO. 1 at 2, AM MENT PERSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION' 26-121 OF THE WHEAT 1 ANX-06-01, WZ-10-05, WZ-10-10, WZ-17-06 #10 N VERIFIED I BY ME AND TO T HAS THE BES F M Y RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. FILING Nos. I and I FDP KNOWLEDGE, I RMATION AND BELIEF, IS CO R OND IN ACCORDANCE W1 -HE CITY OF WHEAT RID MUNICIPAL CODE OF SHEET I TITLE PAGE SHEET 2 SITE PLAN REG No. DATE LAWS, AND ALL APP BLE CO' ORADO -I TUTES, 'CURRENT 4- SHEET 3 OXYGEN PLANT AND CONTROL ROOM ELEVATIONS t- SHEET 4 ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT ELEVATION REVISED EDITION AS AM D, AND T UPON COMLETITION OF 11 T SURVEY THE PROJECT I AGREE TO F I`1 N AS-BUIL'I SU BILL DILLAMAN, SHEET 5 ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT CONTROL ROOM ELEVATIONS SHEET 6 FIRE HYDRANT AND EMERGENCY LANE SIGNAGE EXHIBIT ACCURATELY LOCATING ALL C UCTED ITEMS. STATE OF COLORADO GRFY WOLF ARf�`HITECT-LTRF, 6 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON ARCHTECTURE PL AN N I NG ;N'IEF�NM DESION SIGN RE THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEF�L) ME THIS 4 1543 CHAVPA I ftYL 200 DENVER COLORADO 6002 DAY OF PAO-f-J! ^,L, 20±2 BY c 30x,9 �_4107 fox 303�,N)2Q97 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: SEAL) -7j N6W PUBLIC GAYLEW CARR --- GWAPROJECfN0, 17-464 A UAK HISTORY (SURVEYOR'S T SHEEL (GVVA SHEET WO.) 0 Ln Ov 04 �z qi L, 01 Wc0mmmmEXP`lRLS*RGi!7 Confideritial Proprietary Infarmotian T if'o NAME DATE MILIL-ERCOORS °4 > >tc C7 o 01P, q�� '�2 0�z LO N Nm 00 w" REY infor 'ut f 0S 0:1040wr MdNlas b'�jw tat"' DWN NCD 11,01.17 Dwc� 0 0) q 41 svr2t 0 Ono tfo, not he , shalt usm by anyona 011W than Cows TIRE I B PLUS FURNACE UPGRADE DES KWH 7 0 m 00 r- 0 CD LO LO 10 c; �Z- 6 ro cj N 0 i Brewing cornpmv withaut the priff Written pejmis4p, of caors Brewing 7 CHK KWH z Z Z z 1- z ZLjv, �_OSE zwf� �_C)z z F_ ,,LXJN ::F '15 U U) z z z = i This and the c ' rforlmoalzo ontamFewdlered) shall not t� �qljtd, IrWoduwd T used, APVD KWH U U 1W z W z z 01 zo';; z c%17j �6 U z �E Ld - 41 Whole or in part, for any pur- 1 SHEET TITLE PAGE < U M M m mw W M mw��;5 -WY 0 0 W. 0SW uAtm ally by cs n In 7- m ca MZO 6n :�Zc Ln E3 V) ocr� U > �1 0 z 0 z 0 writing Brewing Company, All copyrights are SCALE N-1 iii T. OF LU m 0� Ld M Li m or mod by < < < < < 0\J J M L K 1 1 H f �F D C D 3333.------ 1�__, E F -cl Z_ 4 5 7 A PID ZON'L_ G 'A' Z,3 E H I or T 0 RY Jt N A fisomm (D L:�L:UW A .9 L �E PROPOSED mr, I-) U-) 11) 113F 4 4 m (D C> lr� 37.75 0 d' q SEE BELOW 50.000, SQ,FT BLDG, HIT. _35' 0 5I 10 --1.— z Zz 6 z d'Z6 z C5 02 0 LLj 2,28 ACRES t; ETC, C, GENERAL USAGE 0 co 1,- (0 Ld T z Ld Z I 1 z z z OF- V) LL4- :ZLLl: l-_ F -^z BUILDING NO, 27/ RAW MATERIALS PROCESSING F_ nz ACREAGE OF LANDSCAPING, U i W i z LEJ Z LLJ zow LLJ M z Lyk Q 0'.5; 7 M :�> 5 9.9 ACRES TOTAL :E�Em 0 0 0 C) r)Z() nZ0 Jt N A fisomm (D L:�L:UW A .9 L �E PROPOSED mr, I-) U-) 11) 113F 4 4 m (D C> lr� 37.75 0 d' q SEE BELOW 50.000, SQ,FT BLDG, HIT. _35' 0 5I 10 --1.— z Zz 6 z d'Z6 z C5 02 (ji 5N LLj 2,28 ACRES t; ETC, C, GENERAL USAGE W :2 14; BATCH, HOUSE zL1j W Ld T z Ld z W PI ACRES BUILDING Q. 26 STREET STREET LOADING & ROADS z 8 ACRES ADDED 20.53 nx BUILDING NO, 27/ RAW MATERIALS PROCESSING LJ ACREAGE OF LANDSCAPING, ,500 SQ,FT' BLDG. HT. 45) '10.7 ACRES BUILDING NO, 28 NATURAL GRASS, PONDS, MIN 20% �ACRES �REJMMMD 34.45 D C B I TO BE REMOVED c D D F c� HI 1j I k/ % SHEET —OF 6 BOOK L _PAG_�— "VFELO�PMFN I 1= RECEPTION NO, FILINGS NO. I & 2, AMENDMENT# 10 IDATE OF RECORDING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INCLUDING A PART OF TALMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILING NO, 1; A PART OF THE NBA/4, S.E.1/41 AND A PART OF THE S.W.1/4, N.E: 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO. LAND USE CHART SHEET 2 OF 6 I FlU663 PL� F C 0 N VER T BATCH TCH AND CULLET L SJ'. SILO HIT, 6-6'--7 'ULLET PLANTS TO I PRODUCE FLINT GLASS NEW OXYGEN PLANT (A) 350 Sj-. EILDG HT 10' 1211 AND CONTROL ROOM (B) BUFFE TANK HT,'73' _6" (AMENDMENT 10) 480S. BLDG HT. 15' (A) SILO 11 T $9'-11 7%8" L-9 21 NEW ABATEMENT EOUIPMEN] 1 AND CONTROL ROOM B) EXHAUST H-I, 94'-Y' (AMENDMENT 10) 23] NEW NEW ASPHALT ROAD EXPANSION 36,968 S.F, (AMENDNAIENT 10) TOTAL SQ. FT. 466,801 SO. FT mov- L:�L:UW A .9 L �E PROPOSED _"J'G ",/111AII ERAGE 2 SIEC� 26-302 B. 10.V1 ACRES, �66 8nj SF 37.75 BUILDING HEIGHT IMAX X 5 u-'- 0 SEE BELOW 50.000, SQ,FT BLDG, HIT. _35' 'LOT SIZES MIN I ACRE 28.74 ACRES, 1 251 951 SF ACREAGE OF HARD SURFACE 22,100 SOYT, BLDG. HT 35' PRODU-CTICN STORAGE 02 0 AREAS, CONCRETE, ASPHALT, 2,28 ACRES 8.07 ETC, C, GENERAL USAGE 14; BATCH, HOUSE F7 PARKING, OFF ACREAGE OF EXIST L PI ACRES BUILDING Q. 26 STREET STREET LOADING & ROADS -------- 8 ACRES ADDED 20.53 5.9 ACRES TOTAL BUILDING NO, 27/ RAW MATERIALS PROCESSING ROAD ACREAGE OF LANDSCAPING, ,500 SQ,FT' BLDG. HT. 45) '10.7 ACRES BUILDING NO, 28 NATURAL GRASS, PONDS, MIN 20% �ACRES �REJMMMD 34.45 I DECORATIVE GRAVEL ETC. PROPANE VAPORIZATION STATION I TO BE REMOVED 9.9 ACRES TOTAL SETBACKS SEC, 126-302 B. ELECTRICAL SWITCH STATION I FlU663 PL� F C 0 N VER T BATCH TCH AND CULLET L SJ'. SILO HIT, 6-6'--7 'ULLET PLANTS TO I PRODUCE FLINT GLASS NEW OXYGEN PLANT (A) 350 Sj-. EILDG HT 10' 1211 AND CONTROL ROOM (B) BUFFE TANK HT,'73' _6" (AMENDMENT 10) 480S. BLDG HT. 15' (A) SILO 11 T $9'-11 7%8" L-9 21 NEW ABATEMENT EOUIPMEN] 1 AND CONTROL ROOM B) EXHAUST H-I, 94'-Y' (AMENDMENT 10) 23] NEW NEW ASPHALT ROAD EXPANSION 36,968 S.F, (AMENDNAIENT 10) TOTAL SQ. FT. 466,801 SO. FT mov- BUILDING NO, 25 PRODUCTION &- SOME WAREHOUSE 130,000 SQ,71. BiDG. HT, 52' GAS T FUTURE EXPANSION EXIST, T ELEPHONE 50.000, SQ,FT BLDG, HIT. _35' EXIST OFFICE STORES AREA BUILDING NO, 36 22,100 SOYT, BLDG. HT 35' PRODU-CTICN STORAGE 02 W— 103,000 SQ,F T T BL H T. 37 WATER SERVICE 01 IMP STATIONS 14; BATCH, HOUSE SILO STORAGE OF RAW MATERIALS EXIST 9 900 SQ'FT. BLDG. Hi. V-10' El BUILDING Q. 26 AIR COMPRESSOR & STORAGE TANKS -------- )<-- w%000 SO'FT BLDG. HT. 30' BUILDING NO, 27/ RAW MATERIALS PROCESSING ROAD EXPANSION ,500 SQ,FT' BLDG. HT. 45) PROPOSED BUILDING NO, 28 RAW I'viATEERIALS PROCESSING EXISITNG 5,000 SQ.FT, BLDG. HT, 30' L7 PROPANE VAPORIZATION STATION I TO BE REMOVED 1 0 (11 BUILDING NO.40 ELECTRICAL SWITCH STATION SUB -STATION CONTROL BUILDING NO,41 900 SOY T BLDG. HT, 15' EELECTRICAL SWITCH STATION MAIN SERVICE ENTRANCE 900 SQ.FTL BLDG. HT. 15' REMOVED J 10 L FUEL STORAGE PROPANE AND FUEL OiL STORAGE GAS METER STATION CULLET RECYCLING CENTER 12 I nu "ILDING NO 29 43,000 SO.FT. BLDG. HT, 35' 6,000 SQ FT, BLDG. HT, 20` CONSTRUCTION SHOP P15MOLD BULK GLASS ADDITION / MAINTENANCE 40,200 SQ F"', BLDG. H'T, 35' SHOP ADDITION 10,000 SQ. BUDG. HIT 35' REPEPT CE IAUNCH% - LOCKER ROOM ADDITION NOT TO BE PERFORMED 3 25' "EXPANSION E18 81 1 BUILDING ADDITION 1,092 SQ.FT. BLDG. HT, 35 11L 19 STORAGE EXISTING STORAGE BUNKERS 1,106 SQ,FT. BLDG, HT. W I FlU663 PL� F C 0 N VER T BATCH TCH AND CULLET L SJ'. SILO HIT, 6-6'--7 'ULLET PLANTS TO I PRODUCE FLINT GLASS NEW OXYGEN PLANT (A) 350 Sj-. EILDG HT 10' 1211 AND CONTROL ROOM (B) BUFFE TANK HT,'73' _6" (AMENDMENT 10) 480S. BLDG HT. 15' (A) SILO 11 T $9'-11 7%8" L-9 21 NEW ABATEMENT EOUIPMEN] 1 AND CONTROL ROOM B) EXHAUST H-I, 94'-Y' (AMENDMENT 10) 23] NEW NEW ASPHALT ROAD EXPANSION 36,968 S.F, (AMENDNAIENT 10) TOTAL SQ. FT. 466,801 SO. FT mov- AERIAL MAPPED 1983 JRELD REVISED 19-92 COORS) BREWING CO. CLASS 0 1- PERATIONS JLE--FFEPSON COUNTY, COLORADO 0 50 1.00 SCALE li, = 1001 Carfidenhai ""' N Tf dudes ation of u pr�tetory0�11ln rm Cels Ile,Company and has hem is fa'stt confidence and shall ml be used by anyone oliber tW c"S not be canted, mprodooed of dead, in whole, or fu part, for any pur— pose w1mlsomr unless speciffeety authorized in wdling by Coots 8jewhug Comluuvyy Ail copyi#8 are hereby exprassly reserved by DE5 nvHK APVD- GREY WOLF-ARCHITECTUPtv. APC417IICIURF PI_N414ftNITEROR DCSGd DEMr.R "0I'4)R4vQ 80202 292,9)07 Y 30,:29,2 4297 ME VWAPROJECTNO. 17-464 S H 2 (GWA SHEET M) NAME DATE MILLERCOORS NCD 11-01,17 i DWG, KWH TITLS KWH B PLUS FURNACE UPGRADE KWH SHEET TIM SITE PLAN F SP.T OF 4 5 EXIS I . _'ANI I ANY SEWEH, EXIST. GAS T - EXIST, T ELEPHONE EXIST ELIRIECT !CAL EXIST. IRRIGATION DITCH W— EXAJIST, WATER SERVICE EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT --GAS EXIST PAS (STREP I) PJ.D, BOUNDARY -------- )<-- FENCE PROPOSED ROAD EXPANSION PROPOSED E ARLA OFINORK EXISITNG POND AERIAL MAPPED 1983 JRELD REVISED 19-92 COORS) BREWING CO. CLASS 0 1- PERATIONS JLE--FFEPSON COUNTY, COLORADO 0 50 1.00 SCALE li, = 1001 Carfidenhai ""' N Tf dudes ation of u pr�tetory0�11ln rm Cels Ile,Company and has hem is fa'stt confidence and shall ml be used by anyone oliber tW c"S not be canted, mprodooed of dead, in whole, or fu part, for any pur— pose w1mlsomr unless speciffeety authorized in wdling by Coots 8jewhug Comluuvyy Ail copyi#8 are hereby exprassly reserved by DE5 nvHK APVD- GREY WOLF-ARCHITECTUPtv. APC417IICIURF PI_N414ftNITEROR DCSGd DEMr.R "0I'4)R4vQ 80202 292,9)07 Y 30,:29,2 4297 ME VWAPROJECTNO. 17-464 S H 2 (GWA SHEET M) NAME DATE MILLERCOORS NCD 11-01,17 i DWG, KWH TITLS KWH B PLUS FURNACE UPGRADE KWH SHEET TIM SITE PLAN F SP.T OF 4 5 -7 J 4 --S TIF -IN TEF PRO E L 1 INLET DIAIMPER 891-" 7/1"8)) CEL 6 6 CLEAN OUT P 64 0 INLET DUCT..: FILINUGS NO. 1 & 2, AMENDMENT # 10 DA: -11E OF RECORDING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN T AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN I HE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INCLUDING A PART OF TALMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILING NO. €, A PART OF THE N,W,1/4, S.E.1/4 AND A PART OF THE S.W.1/4, N.E. 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, C-OLORg SHEET 4 OF 6 CJ. ft, DS1 STIORAGE SILO j 84`0 EXHAJST S -Ary ............ j---- CCI500'VESSELSFl '4)-PLACEL-S 71 . .......... DUCT SUPPOR Ii P L A, I F 0 FIV 61 4 " 0 BY P A S 4 7'-- 6 0U ILL I PLIMUlei -i, z 0 J, (Y10 FL E)t P1 JI FR D A I'V P E T pi", 4'—IDLCS, ABATEMENT EQUIPMENTANDCONTROL P SITE CA E HJS�TORY 0 0 LO 0�, cli C31 C(7 CDC> c� CD yY —co —L5— LO 11') -7 C50 6 7h -c L�2 (D Z ZZ 4,o 0 z z z ZW Z Ui I z z z 0 f-- `L� W. Lj F— t-- 1-- 1-- F-02: F— MEW V) f-- t, i— z z z z z Amf,-- Lij W L1.1 L-1 LL] 50w Lj Uj I-- LLJ < j :� Uzj0w:i wz z -1 z to 0 0 OZO OZO 0 Uj z z ZZU ZZO Z z mcC 0 LLL Ld UJ!5 uj-j l LJ f 00fY mcL jEL— gi 0 w LLI W< < < < < 0 N 11 M L K G L 0� E D C LL B D YVA S T F S n R A C E � 1 D )-Jt EI SACK STATION ii DEES C111K —vo �p ANT BATF DE AU ,�) I �-T - BLOWER L t E-OLIPM.-N C 1 -RC of 0 3 U Y'NLP-1., SH 1 S1 F1 P FOR E-EVATIONS, ii DEES C111K —vo �p LEXH AU ,�) I �-T - BLOWER L 0 GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURF. EAROKITEC-URE PLANNNG INTERIOR DE51GN EAST LEVATION 154,1 C.HmrpkA 0WVtP, CO�QRADO 303,197.,9107 F— 303232:x287 P ` —9-1 1--r- -0-4— L A K E #'22 GWAPROJECTNO 17 -AAA Goliffilential Proprietary Informlion ibis drowung includes confidential prolprbitar, info moUon of Coots, Cornpuny and has been issued 10 strici confidence and sliqlhiot be used by anyone other -than Com Braving Cowpony without the prior Witten Permission of Com Rrv*g This drawing mid the nfarmntim Contained thereto '401f, not be coplej, reproduced or used, in whafe or In part, for any pur— pose whemew unless vi-Ifleally outhodzed in witiq by Coors '7'are DEES C111K —vo �p H i ISHE4 L- I GWA SHEET NO,) NAME DATE I I MILLE RCOORS NCS DwrG1-- - - CNH 1ITLE B PLUS FURNACE UPGRADE KWH. 0" ABATEMENT EQUIPMENT SHEET E T1 TL E ELEVATION --F—S—IAL—E- 4 1 _07 HT, 4 o 6 K L A f G R0D L L -j I DATE OF RECORDING FILINGS NO. 1 & 2, AMENDMENT# 10 I FINAL DEI VELOPMEN PLAN AN OFFIVf.'AIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INCLUDING A PART 0117 T, LI INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILING N0.1 I A PART OF THE. ' 14, S, E. 1141 AN D A PART OF THE S, W, 1114, A .E. 1/43 ALL IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH P. JEFFERSON COUNTY, CO LOR.A.D0. SHEET 6 OF 6 GENERAL NOTE: DRIVE LANES ARE EMERGENCY ACCESS LANES EMERGENCY ACCESS LANE SIGN FIRE HYDRANT OEM ff 2 EMERGENCY ACCESS LANE 'AS E INI I TOPS` c'I � "A" wl < 6 0 z zijjl-- U.j Li Oz '75 I -- Co Ld z Z. < t; z -s�d -j -1, L,j zc5L z I L < W Li ld LLI T W uj Yw -2i LD c:1 cl Z E� L'j U Z z7oizzu z Cr f1i uJ --j L' -I I iE 2E I < LL� E D '117 IL I Sl` Th, 7-' T A 11 EHOITT h1l J-' G. 6 IR I � —o— — ------------ �fideMwl T'im drowing ;nv',6dccirfid enil el prnfirlelory iniomaotio. of Coors Breeirig C(imporiv and bli,- beff, isawed in st'ict confiderce �lqd Mo f used, br, nnymea oe., tri 'IuMDES DIrripilrly wrlhoul the oiro- wriften Derrroiozicn iI Cv'ro 13f1"A7q K lr CrImany, Tl* firoeivic Pind Cle informotign ol)fd"iled Morion, �hcjl 1APVD rso be cooled, ipprc,1-jud or in whole, or iii pvt "f oily pur-, 101 40' 80' 120' pose 'Aabie'vs, unllea' rpedficall+ lin, ffj7ed in v.,ritiol; l/ mots: Brevang r',ornpcny, All copyingll(E ure SCALF- i 40' N A N/I F— j GREY WOLF ARCHFI—FECTURE I 5ir �HAMF�'i S- in, GWAPROJECT NO, 17-464 -T 6 'GWA SHEET NO.) D4TE L 0 7D F?�') NCD D VA" U AW, B PLUS FURNACE UPGRADE!, 064' HYDRANT AND E[v',1LPC-E-tK-'Y I-Al'41-- SKj[',1AG'r-- EE- X 4 -IIB. IIID SCALo Sri T,. 6) "'1 I EXHIBIT 4: SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Attached) Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment 12 2 A I B VICINITY MAP r,gel3« „PrnV Prinbowi MdI Ferret nd r� W55in�, RAINBOW o� RIDGE Waarnm 541h A,q Ridge ApeM1mene Q ^ �'I, "5611'r, W 6M, PJ y' OBERON Amada cemetery pq h ha — S6 � ARVADA I S° d' 9t aam y,�ypn 54t P1 A — .. r' PLAZA AREA N' 54th Ave _ =� — ad9a0.e .i 5"' Pt o a wean dlreAve X61 1D .o nown — _ = wsaea Ae F 3 yV` PROJECT LOCATION 3 WHEAT RIDGE, CO 5 7 Wst stPl 41 MlF ILLER ST GARRISON LAKE W 50TH AVE wsmna4e 11 Ale Ave 114911,Ale war"_h Fvc ry ® m 9,h Ave W 4Ah PI oY W 4]h Ave �KIRGng Vlllaga — Ayartmente0 MANSFIELD W 96bt Ave m Pennln91 lememery sebeel G WUIn Am W4am M. PTARMIGAN = - CONDOS WUthAve Google W44m n� EXPLANATION OF AMENDMENT AMENDMENT TO ADD NOISE WALL AROUND OXYGEN PLANT. NO CHANGES TO USES OR DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE PROPOSED WITH THIS AMENDMENT. CASE HISTORY NUMBERS: WZ-77-16, WZ-83-36, WZ-85-28, WZ-93-4, WZ-99-1, WZ-02-04, WZ-02-11, WZ-06-01, WV -06-01, MS -06-05, ANX-06-01, WZ-10-05, WZ-10-10, WZ-17-06, WZ-21-02 C I D I E I F G H CASE HISTORY Lu \ \ \ \ 0M \J� Broil Corrigy Alaut the prior r IRM Breeilg CHK N JMa N 0 MP\M 3c cn MN 01 ^ M LO .�� m ��Q hereby el�resel reeerYed by Care BreeIng y: N n 1 ON- d'\ d'\ H\ U\ H\ \ 0 It -M N O CA \ N 1 O O a0 n to In In L 12F -z M N 0 Z 0 0 0 6 6 oar oar o WEN z o o z o w Z Z Z Z Z ZDF ZDF Z vi WN Z Z Z (9 a W H W H W F W F W F W HOW W HOW W l-_ W NNW Q W U= z z W z 2 M M M M M M LZM MZM M w 0�2rn w M w= M NM w U o 0 0 0 0 o pZ0 pZ0 p 0 z z Z w Z ww Z Z w Z w Z w ZZU w ZZU w Z w ood 0 z Q M M M M M Ma Ma M Q� Q M M ir M Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q P 10 1 N I M I J I H G F E D C A B C FILINGS NO. 1 & 2, AMENDMENT # 11 AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INCLUDING A PART OF TALMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILING NO. 1, A PART OF THE N.W.1/4, S.E.1/4 AND A PART OF THE S.W.1/4, N.E. 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO. SHEET 1 OF 4 LEGAL DESCRIPTION COORS BREWING COMPANY, BEING THE OWNER OF THE REAL PROPERTY OF 28.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: LOT 1 OF COORS PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT FILING NO. 1, A PORTION OF MILLER STREET RIGHT—OF—WAY AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 890 PAGE 16 UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER 86051871, AND A PORTION OF LOT 8 OF ARVADA RIDGE FINAL PLAT, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF TALMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILING NO. 1, AND A PORTION OF THE N.W. 1/4, S.E. 1/4, AND THE S.W. 1/4, N.E. 1/4, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6TH. P.M., WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE S.E. CORNER, N.W. 1/4, S.E. 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 16, THENCE S89'30'02"W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE N.W. 1/4, S.E. 1/4, 30.00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINING, THENCE CONTINUING S89030'02"W, 921.39 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT THAT IS 376.72 FT. EAST OF THE S.W. CORNER, N.W. 1/4, S.E. 1/4, THENCE NORTH AND PARALLEL TO THE NORTH—SOUTH CENTER— LINE OF SECTION 16, 1323.42 FEET , TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF THE COLORADO AND SOUTHERN RAIL—ROAD, THENCE N74'40'18"E ALONG THE SAID SOUTH RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE, 642.61 FEET TO THE N.W. CORNER OF SAID TALMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK,FILING NO.1,THENCE SO'12'57"E ALONG THE THE WEST LINE OF SAID INDUSTRIAL PARK 389.34 FEET, THENCE N89'33'01"E, 383.29 FEET, TO THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE MILLER STREET RIGHT—OF—WAY; THENCE ALONG A NON—TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT HAVING A DELTA OF 17019'11", A RADIUS OF 770.00 FEET, AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 232.76 FEET WITH A CHORD BEARING S8'51'47"E, 231.88 FEET; THENCE SO'12'10"W, 236.62 FEET; THENCE ALONG A TANGENTAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A DELTA OF 17'39'50", A RADIUS OF 670.00 FEET AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 206.56 FEET; THENCE S17'27'39"W, 164.38'; THENCE ALONG A TANGENTAL CURVE TO THE LEFT HAVING A DELTA OF 1'10'49", A RADIUS OF 730.00 FEET AND AN ARC LENGTH OF 15.04 FEET; THENCE S89'47'48"W, 30.00 FEET; THENCE SO'12'12"E ALONG THE WEST RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF MILLER STREET 228.79 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN BOOK 2163, PAGE 738 AND BOOK 89, PAGE 16 OF THE RECORDS OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO, CONTAINING 28.74 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I,— DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN ON THE (FDP FILLINGS NO. 1 & 2. AMENDMENT 11 HAS BEEN VERIFIED BY ME AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE, INFORMATION AND BELIEF, IS CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE MUNICIPAL CODE OF LAWS, AND ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED, AND THAT UPON COMLETITION OF THE PROJECT I AGREE TO FURNISH AN AS—BUILT SURVEY ACCURATELY LOCATING ALL CONSTRUCTED ITEMS. (SURVEYOR'S SEAL) SIGNATURE ALLOWED USES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACKS: SEC. 26-302 B. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 50'-0" MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE: SEC. 26-302 B. "LANDSCAPING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20% OF THE TOTAL LOT AREA" (SECTION 26-502) "ALL PARKING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS." ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS." "ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS." "ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS." ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL TO BE APPROVED BY THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STREETSCAPE AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN MANUAL." A SOUND WALL SHALL BE PERMITTED THROUGH THIS AMENDMENT, SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO BUILDINGS EXCEPT FOR THE STANDARDS LIMITING THE AMOUNT OF METAL PANEL TO 607% REQUIRING THE ADDITION OF 40% OF OTHER FACADE MATERIALS, REQUIRING AT LEAST 3 MATERIALS ON THE FACADE, AND ALL TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS. CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE CHARACTER OF THIS DEVELOPMENT SHALL REFLECT THE INDUSTRIAL NATURE OF THE INTENDED USE. ACCEPTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BE CONCRETE, METAL OR GLASS. BUILDING COLORS SHALL BE EARTH TONES. OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE BELOW SIGNED OWNER(S), OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT(S) THEREOF, DO HEREBY AGREE THAT THE PROPERTY LEGALLY DESCRIBED HEREON WILL BE DEVELOPED AS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE USES, RESTRICTIONS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THIS PLAN, AND AS MAY OTHERWISE BE REQUIRED BY LAW. I (WE) FURTHER RECOGNIZE THAT THE APPROVAL OF A REZONING TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT, AND APPROVAL OF THIS FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, DOES NOT CREATE A VESTED PROPERTY RIGHT. VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS MAY ONLY ARISE AND ACCRUE PERSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 26-121 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. BILL DILLAMAN STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF JEFFERSON THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF A.D. 20_ BY WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NOTARY PUBLIC APPROVAL THIS WHEAT RIDGE ATTEST CITY CLERK J K L SHEET 1 OF 4 BOOK PAGE RECEPTION NO. DATE OF RECORDING CITY CERTIFICATION DAY OF _ 20_ BY THE CITY OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MAYOR COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE ACCEPTED FOR RECORDING IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF JEFFERSON COUNTY AT GOLDEN, COLORADO ON THIS _ DAY OF 20_— AT --O'CLOCK— JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY: DEPUTY CLERK REVISED 08/21/17 PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION APPROVED THIS DAY OF BY THE WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION. CHAIRPERSON ENTS SHEET 1 TITLE PAGE SHEET 2 SITE PLAN SHEET 3 ENLARGED SITE PLAN SHEET 4 SOUND WALL ELEVATIONS Consia ltid Proprietary Information This ,dudes anffdentld praprie�Cyanpfammymtian of Caare BInreeInetri t conftnoe and andel notban been be used by anyone other than Coors D DES Broil Corrigy Alaut the prior r IRM Breeilg CHK yp��ermieataddlrroaoeffi�CCqoors Morm�atlalThwntaylM$Ior�dn dual APUD not be capill, reproduced or used, In elude or In part, for any r autllalzed In reWng by any Breehg Componyc All copyright. are hereby el�resel reeerYed by Care BreeIng y: D I E I F G H J ORIGINAL P I D FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BOOK 14 PAGE 18 RECEPTION No. 00947892 DATE 3/18/76 P I D AMENDMENT No. 1 BOOK 36 PAGE 11 RECEPTION No. 84017574 DATE 2/27/84 P I D AMENDMENT No. 2 BOOK 89 PAGE 16 RECEPTION No. 86051871 DATE 5/16/86 P I D AMENDMENT No. 3 ODP BOOK 70 PAGE 51 RECEPTION No. 93127559 DATE 8/20/93 P I D AMENDMENT No. 4 ODP BOOK 105 PAGE 47 RECEPTION No. F1063350 DATE 5/30/00 P I D AMENDMENT No. 5 ODP BOOK 115 PAGE 64 RECEPTION No. F1480796 DATE 5/13/02 P I D AMENDMENT No. 6 ODP BOOK 118 PAGE 50 RECEPTION No. F1620499 DATE 12/04 P I D AMENDMENT No. 7 FILING No. 2 OPD REC No. 2006151563 DATE 12/28/06 FILING No. 2 FDP REC No. 2006151564 DATE 12/28/06 P I D AMENDMENT No. 8 FILING Nos. 1 and 2 FDP REC No. 201019957 DATE 12/30/10 P I D AMENDMENT No. 9 FILING Nos. 1 and 2 FDP REC No. 2011042918 DATE 04/29/11 P I D AMENDMENT No. 10 FILING Nos. 1 and 2 FDP REC No. 2017120476 DATE 11/22/17 P I D AMENDMENT No. 11 FILING Nos. 1 and 2 FDP REC No. DATE GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN 1543 CHAMPA ST SUITE 200 DENVER COLORADO 80202 303.292.9107 fax 303.292-4297 ■ ® ■ email: archOgmyndfetudio.eom GWA PROJECT N0. 17_464.3 SHEET 1 (GWA SHEET NO.) NAME DATE MILLERCOORS CW 11.06.20 TITLE K SvM OUND WALL AT OXYGEN PLAN KO rn IF TITLE PAGE NTS I SHT. 1 OF 4 K I L 2 3 0 5 Ono 7 2 3 GRA( m 5 GRAD 7 A B C D E F G H J K L COORS PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT SHO. OF 4 BOOK PAGE RECEPTION NO. FILINGS NO. 1 & 2, AMENDMENT # DATEOFRECORDING AN AMENDMENT TO A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INCLUDING A PART OF TALMAR INDUSTRIAL PARK, FILING NO. 1, A PART OF THE N.W.1/4, S.E.1/4 AND A PART OF THE S.W.1/4, N.E. 1/4, ALL IN SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH P.M., JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO. SHEET 4 OF 4 }103'-4" O.A.W. amu, iyMANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS HORIZONTAL RIB PBR—PANEL J WEST WALL ELEVATION lom KEYNOTE LEGEND METAL COLUMN, MATCH DARK BROWN PREFINISHED PBR METAL WALL PANEL, DARK BROWN (KOKO BROWN) PREFINISHED PBR METAL WALL PANEL, MEDIUM BROWN (SADDLE TAN) ®PREFINISHED PBU METAL WALL PANEL, LIGHT BROWN (LIGHT STONE) PREFINISHED METAL DOOR, DARK BROWN TO MATCH ADJACENT METAL WALL PANEL !tiRl1RTIG I\�I.{}/:1 BJ+�1 �11PJ EAST WALL ELEVATION NORTH WALL ELEVATION MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE ARwimcm E PLWNIND INIERIDR DIMON 150.5ST 21 BW 1i 1R CCWU E=2 ]0311]9291" .810) W. =21i ■ email: vdiayey.wkWab.mn I GWAPROJECTNO. 17-464,3 1 0 11111111111 1 01111111111 IF 11i111111111111 L 111111111111 1111111111 111111111111110111111111 0 SHEET 4 (GWASHEETN0.1 axl Iwm heei Illned End by unpa Eli MZ (OIIg60R°11= dd „1, pe�,q„P,By,pa ffmi ti o ti to tiouuaaea 9 M Y Do" Uni y AN w alae 6n��q canpmlt NAME DATE MILLERCOORS DNN NCD 11.06.20 DWG. TITLE SOUND WALL AT OXYGEN PL DES CHK K� APw Krm OXYGEN PLANT SOUND WALL SHEET ELEVATIONS TITLE SCALE ve• = v -D• I SHT. 4 OF A B C D E F G H J K L amu, iyMANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS HORIZONTAL RIB PBR—PANEL J WEST WALL ELEVATION lom KEYNOTE LEGEND METAL COLUMN, MATCH DARK BROWN PREFINISHED PBR METAL WALL PANEL, DARK BROWN (KOKO BROWN) PREFINISHED PBR METAL WALL PANEL, MEDIUM BROWN (SADDLE TAN) ®PREFINISHED PBU METAL WALL PANEL, LIGHT BROWN (LIGHT STONE) PREFINISHED METAL DOOR, DARK BROWN TO MATCH ADJACENT METAL WALL PANEL !tiRl1RTIG I\�I.{}/:1 BJ+�1 �11PJ EAST WALL ELEVATION NORTH WALL ELEVATION MANUFACTURES INSTRUCTIONS GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE ARwimcm E PLWNIND INIERIDR DIMON 150.5ST 21 BW 1i 1R CCWU E=2 ]0311]9291" .810) W. =21i ■ email: vdiayey.wkWab.mn I GWAPROJECTNO. 17-464,3 1 2 3 An I [:1 7 SHEET 4 (GWASHEETN0.1 axl Iwm heei Illned End by unpa Eli MZ (OIIg60R°11= dd „1, pe�,q„P,By,pa ffmi ti o ti to tiouuaaea 9 M Y Do" Uni y AN w alae 6n��q canpmlt NAME DATE MILLERCOORS DNN NCD 11.06.20 DWG. TITLE SOUND WALL AT OXYGEN PL DES CHK K� APw Krm OXYGEN PLANT SOUND WALL SHEET ELEVATIONS TITLE SCALE ve• = v -D• I SHT. 4 OF A B C D E F G H J K L 2 3 An I [:1 7 EXHIBIT 5: SOUND WALL EXHIBITS (Attached) Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment 13 KEYNOTE LEGEND ❑I METAL COLUMN, MATCH DARK BROWN aPREFINISHED PBR METAL WALL PANEL, DARK BROWN (KOKO BROWN) ❑3 PREFINISHED PBR METAL WALL PANEL, MEDIUM BROWN (SADDLE TAN) ®PREFINISHED PBU METAL WALL PANEL, LIGHT BROWN (LIGHT STONE) ❑5 PREFINISHED METAL DOOR, DARK BROWN TO MATCH ADJACENT METAL WALL PANEL WEST WALL ELEVATION EAST WALL ELEVATION NORTH WALL ELEVATION ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ■ INTERIOR DESIGN 1543 champa st.#200 ■ denver, co 80202 phone: 303.292.9107 ■ fax: 303.292.4297 f 6 ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATION APPEARING HEREIN IS CO'YRGHTED INFORMATION AND SHALL NOT RE DUPUCATED, DISCLOSED. OR OTHERNSE OUPUCATED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF GREY WOLF ARCHRECNRE PROJECT NUMBER 21-464.3 DRAWN XY CHECKED KWH ISSUE 01.26.21 SDP 1st SUB 03.12.21 SDP REV1 REVISIONS ELEVATIONS A1.0 � z I__L O w w W Q X V J z� o� wz zw zoo <�� zZ n 0 u� < O n `n w O0u- LL U u/ w ■ ALL DRAWN AND WRITTEN INFORMATION APPEARING HEREIN IS CO'YRGHTED INFORMATION AND SHALL NOT RE DUPUCATED, DISCLOSED. OR OTHERNSE OUPUCATED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF GREY WOLF ARCHRECNRE PROJECT NUMBER 21-464.3 DRAWN XY CHECKED KWH ISSUE 01.26.21 SDP 1st SUB 03.12.21 SDP REV1 REVISIONS ELEVATIONS A1.0 PERSPECTIVE VIEW VIEW FROM RIDGE ROAD PERSPECTIVE VIEW ENLARGED ISOMETRIC VIEW ARCHITECTURE PLANNING INTERIOR DESIGN 1543 champa St.#200 denver, co 80202 phone: 303.292.9107 fax: 303.292.4297 6 NL DRUM NO N1TRN IfpYATION NPENMM 1-111113116 COPNIMTEO NFMMAIIM .AND SE W BE DIRNATED, Dom. M DREIR6E DUIWTED MRNUT THE MITTEN CONSENT M MEY MAF NN1111EC1URE PROUECT NUMBER 21-464.3 DRANK XY MECKED KWH ISSUE 01.26.21 SDP let SUB 03.12.21 SDP REVI REMSIONS ELEVATIONS A1.1 wz zw zoo � o u�Qz � O Onw ODw LL LL ■U�w NL DRUM NO N1TRN IfpYATION NPENMM 1-111113116 COPNIMTEO NFMMAIIM .AND SE W BE DIRNATED, Dom. M DREIR6E DUIWTED MRNUT THE MITTEN CONSENT M MEY MAF NN1111EC1URE PROUECT NUMBER 21-464.3 DRANK XY MECKED KWH ISSUE 01.26.21 SDP let SUB 03.12.21 SDP REVI REMSIONS ELEVATIONS A1.1 Note: staff report provided here was updated on April 13 to include this section exhibit II' -6' 0 i , SITE SECTION A2.0 1 1/16"= 1'-0" 77 ARCHITECTURE PLANNING ■ INTERIOR DESIGN 1543 champa st. #200 ■ denver, co 8 202 phone: 303.292.9107 ■ fax: 303.292.4297 m X W Elm Wz zW zoo Q U �zz nWz:) 7;o U� <o 0 n W w OPLL UU LL w ■ ALL DRAWN AND WaTIEN INFORMATION APPEMNG HEREIN IS COPYIWGHTED INFORMATION AND SHALL NOT BE DUPLICATED, DISCLOSED, OR OTHERNSE DUPUCATED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE PROJECT NUMBER 21-464.3 DRAWN XY CHECKED KW ISSUE 01.26.21 SDP 1st SUB REVISIONS SITE SECTION EXHIBIT 6: APPLICANT LETTER (Attached) Case No. WZ-21-02 /RTC Sound Wall SDP Amendment 14 GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE MEN Thursday, April 01, 2021 Stephanie Stevens, AICP /Senior Planner Community Development Department 7500 W. 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 (Phone)303-235-2848 (e-mail) sstevens@ci.wheatridge.co.us Re: 10619 W. 50" Ave SDP Amendment 11 Dear Ms. Stevens, We are applying for an SDP Amendment for the Rocky Mountain Bottling Company in order for them to add a noise wall to their property. This noise wall will be around the existing oxygen plant at their facility and is in response to complaints from the adjacent neighborhood. The wall is a technically designed sound wall, not a building or a fence, thereby subjecting it to the standards outlined in the SDP. Please note that the existing zoning does not contemplate walls beyond what is allowed by the fencing code. Therefore, we need an amendment and review by the Planning Commission. Compliance with Wheat Ridge Specific Development Plan Review Criteria The project meets the intent and requirements of Section 26-301 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal code. The intent of the planned development district is to permit the establishment of well-designed, innovative developments which may not be feasible under a standard zone district, but which may be permitted through the use of an approved development plan by assuring greater control and specificity of intended development character, use, operations and maintenance, while at the same time allowing flexibility and diversity. The project is an amendment to an existing PID. The proposed uses for the Amendment correspond to the existing use of the property and ODP, as it is all industrial development. No additional infrastructure or facilities will be required by this proposed amendment. Existing Zoning The project is zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) and contains several different industrial uses. Across Ridge Road to the north is Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Agriculture -One (A-1). Compliance with Coors Planned Industrial Development Requirements Minimum building setbacks: sec. 26-302 b. Maximum building height: 50'-0" Maximum building coverage: sec. 26-302 b. Because this is a PID district, the Industrial Employment (I -E) zoning standards apply. The northern property line is at the rear of the property and requires a setback of 25 feet. Side setbacks are 10 feet. The noise wall meets all setback requirements. For I -E, the maximum height of structures is 50 feet. The noise wall is 40 feet and so meets this requirement. The noise wall adds very little building coverage tothe site, so the building coverage still does not exceed the maximum allowed. 1543 CHAMPA STREET SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 303.292.9107 arch@greywolfstudio.com GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE MEN Landscaping shall be a minimum of 20% of the total lot area (section 26-502) The project already meets all landscaping minimums. No additional landscaping is proposed as part of the project All parking shall be in conformance with section 26-501 of the wheat ridge code of laws. No new parking is proposed in this project. All exterior lighting shall be in conformance with section 26-503 of wheat ridge code of laws. No new exterior lighting is proposed in this project. All fencing shall be in conformance with section 26-603 of the wheat ridge code of laws. No fencing is proposed in this project. The noise wall will be reviewed under the Architectural and Site Design Manual. All signage shall be in conformance with article vii of the wheat ridge code of laws. No signage is proposed in this project. Architectural detail to be approved by the planning and development director in accordance with the streetscape and architectural design manual. Please see below review of compliance with the current Architectural and Site Design Manual. The character of this development shall reflect the industrial nature of the intended use. Acceptable materials shall be concrete, metal or glass. Building colors shall be earth tones. The noise wall's facade will be made up of earth -toned metal. Fencing and Wall Requirements Section 26-603: Generally, no divisional fence, wall or hedge above the height of forty-eight (48) inches shall be permitted within a minimum required front yard, or above the height of six (6) feet in instances not otherwise specified. The noise wall is 40 feet tall. Due to its height, the noise wall is not covered by the fencing and wall requirements. The wall instead will substantially comply with the Architectural and Site Design Manual. This is also the reason why we need an amendment and review by the Planning Commission. Compliance with Architectural and Site Design Manual -4.2 Heavy Commercial / Light Industrial The proposed amendment is in substantial compliance with the applicable design standards, which are the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The project is requesting relief from a few sections due to both technical and structural design requirements of the noise wall as well as the nature of the noise wall itself. A - Facade Design - Design Standards 1 - Facade Detail— Each facade shall incorporate at least two of the following elements: Reveals, Belt courses, Cornices, Deep overhangs a minimum of 3 feet in depth, Expression of a structural or architectural repeating element of least one foot in depth, Recessed windows and/or storefronts, Color and/or texture differences, or Articulation of windows and doorways, which may include sills, mullions, or pilasters that create a three-dimensional expression. The noise wall meets this requirement by having 3 different color differences in the different metal panel types and by having repeating columns (structural elements) that are at least one foot in depth. 2 — Facade Articulation - Each facade shall have at least one variation in plane depth, a minimum of one foot in depth for every 100 linear feet of the length of the facade. Nonpermanent features such as canopies or awnings will 1543 CHAMPA STREET SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 303.292.9107 arch@greywolfstudio.com GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE MEN not qualify as variation. Plane depth variation maybe accomplished through elements such as: Upper level stepbacks, Recessed entries, Recessed windows and/or storefronts, or Offsets in the general plane of the facade including columns, pilasters, protruding bays, reveals, fins, ribs, balconies, cornices or eaves. The noise wall meets this requirement through repeating structural columns that are least 1' in depth from the main plane of the wall. The noise wall also has a cornice which extends out from the main body of the wall. 5— Overhead Roll -up Doors - Overhead roll -up doors should be placed on facades that are not visible from the public street or visible from an adjacent residential property. If roll -up doors are visible from the street, architectural enhancement shall be provided, such as canopies, recessed entries, or variation in the surrounding building materials. The project is not proposing any overhead roll -up doors. B - Materials — Design Standards 3 — Prohibited Materials - The following materials are not allowed: Plywood paneling, Vinyl and aluminum siding, Un -articulated large format concrete panels, or Exposed raw concrete. The noise wall does not include any prohibited materials. D — Screening — Loading, Service Areas, and Utilities No loading, service areas, or utility areas are proposed for this project. Requests for Relief from the Architectural and Site Design Manual Architectural and Site Design Manual -4.2 Heavy Commercial / Light Industrial A - Facade Design — Design Standards 3 - Primary Entrance - The primary entryshall be emphasized through at least two of the following: Changes in wall plane or building massing, Differentiation in material and/or color, Higher level of detail, or Enhanced lighting. The design team is requesting relief from the primary entrance design standard. The noise wall is screening the north, east, and west sides of the oxygen plant. Primary access to the oxygen plant is from the south side, where there is no screen wall. Therefore, there is no primary entrance to emphasize, and this design standard cannot be met. 4 — Roof Form - Roof forms and parapet heights should be varied, and where appropriate, should emphasize the facade articulation and variation of building materials. Roof forms over 100linearfeet shall incorporate at least two of the following: Changes in roof or parapet height, Decorative cornice or eave treatment, Differentiation in material and/or color, or Changes in roof type, such as hipped or gabled roof lines and modulated flat roof lines. The design team is requesting relief from the roof form design standard. The noise wall does not have a roof, so would not be able to meet any roof standards. B - Materials — Design Standards 1— Primary Materials - each facade shall contain at least 40% of one or more of the following materials: Brick, Stone, Integral colored textured concrete block, Hard coat stucco, Synthetic brick and masonry materials, or Terra- cotta. The design team is requesting relief from the use of 'primary materials' on the wall. Adding materials other than metal panels to the noise wall would significantly impact the structural integrity of the wall, as well as prevent it from achieving its noise reduction purpose. The metal panels are an integral part of the wall's sound reduction and isolation characteristics. 1543 CHAMPA STREET SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 303.292.9107 arch@greywolfstudio.com GREY WOLF ARCHITECTURE MEN 2— Secondary Materials - the follo wing materials are allowed but may not exceed 60% of any facade: Smooth - faced concrete masonry units (CMU), Exterior insulating finishing system (EIFS), Metal panels, or Articulated concrete panels. The design team is requesting to increase the allowed metal panel usage from 60% to 100%. The metal panels are an integral part of the wall's sound reduction and isolation characteristics. Adding materials other than metal panels to the noise wall would significantly impact the structural integrity of the wall, as well as prevent it from achieving its noise reduction purpose. 4 — Material Variation - Each facade shall include at least three different materials. A change in color or texture may count as one material variation. Windows, canopies, and doorways will not count as a change in material. The design team is requesting relief from the requirement to have three different materials on the facade. The design team has tried to meet the intent of the design standard by providing as much variation as possible with the metal panels, while still preserving the structural integrity of the noise wall. The noise wall includes two different metal panel types in three different colors with two different orientations. C —Transparency — Design Standards 1 - Each facade shall be at least 15 percent transparent. 2 - Transparency calculation: transparency shall be calculated as the percentage of clear, non -reflective glass within the ground floorfacade. Transparent doors and window mullions shall count as transparent area. Structural elements and opaque or reflective glass shall not be counted as transparent area. The design team is requesting relief from the transparency design standard. The purpose of this structure is to reduce noise from the adjacent oxygen plant. Transparency in the noise wall would prevent it from achieving this purpose. Compliance with Streetscape Design Manual 1.3 Applicability The standards and guidelines in this manual apply to: • Any new development along collector and arterial streets, identified in the Roadway Classification Map (Figure 1.14). This includes new development, redevelopment, and additions over 50 percent of the existing floor area. • Improvements to existing collectors and arterials. • The new construction of collectors, arterials, or any local street serving mixed use or commercial development. • Any City funded street improvement project. Based on this list, the noise wall does not trigger any ROW improvements. Therefore, the Streetscape Design Manual does not apply to the project. We look forward to your review of our SDP application. Best regards, Kenneth W. Harshman, AIA Principal Grey Wolf Architecture 1543 CHAMPA STREET SUITE 200 DENVER, COLORADO 80202 303.292.9107 arch@greywolfstudio.com