Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-19-21City of W heat -Midge PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA August 19, 2021 Notice is hereby given of a Public Meeting to be held before the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission on August 19, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. This meeting will be conducted as a virtual meeting and in person at 7500 W. 291h Avenue, Municipal Building, if allowed to meet on that date per COVID-19 restrictions. Members of the Planning Commission and City staff will be physically present at the Municipal building for this meeting if allowed by health guidelines. The public may participate in these ways: 1. Provide comment in advance at www.wheatridgespeaks.org (comment by noon on August 18) 2. Virtually attend and participate in the meeting through a device or phone: • Click hereto join and provide public comment (create a Zoom account to join) • Or call 1-669-900-6833 with Meeting ID 820 1854 0321 and Passcode: 140016 3. View the meeting live or later at www.wheatridgespeaks.org, Channel 8, or YouTube Live at https://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/view 4. Attend in person (meeting will be in-person unless prohibited by COVID-19 restrictions). 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE THE ORDER OF THE AGENDA 5. PUBLIC COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS (Public comments may be limited to 3 minutes.) 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Study Session — Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan Update Planning Commission Agenda—August 19, 2021 (continued on neat page) OLD BUSINESS A. Upcoming Dates 8. ADJOURNMENT Public comment is welcome during any public hearing item. The standard procedure for a public hearing is as follows: Page 2 a. Staff presentation b. Applicant presentation — if applicable c. Public comment —time may be limited at the discretion of the Chair, often to 3 minutes d. Staff/applicant response e. Close public hearing f Commission discussion and decision Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Sara Spaulding, Public Information Officer at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of a meeting ifyou are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. ♦��4_ Wheatf id e I ( OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT " Memorandum TO: Planning Commission FROM: Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager DATE: August 12, 2021 (for the August 19 Study Session) SUBJECT: Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan Update BACKGROUND In November 2020, City Council was introduced to the idea of a Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan. On January 25, 2021, Council awarded a contract to MIG, Inc. (MIG), a professional planning firm, to lead the community through the master planning process. Study sessions were held in May 2021 with City Council and with the Planning Commission to introduce the consultant team, share the existing conditions scan, and preview the public process. The purpose of the August 19 study session is to provide an update on the project, specifically to share public input to date and to seek direction related to development of a preferred concept. The same content will be presented to City Council in a study session on August 16. PROJECT STATUS The City and SCL Health, with the help of MIG, are committed to partnering with the community to ensure all voices are heard in the planning process. Public engagement began in April 2021 and opportunities for community input have included a range of stakeholders, events, and activities. Completed activities include the following: • April 16 — Stakeholder steering committee meeting • May 1 — Public meeting #1 (on-site walking tour) • May 6 — Planning Commission study session • May 10 — City Council study session • May 20 — Community focus group A meeting • May 24 — Community focus group B meeting • May 27 — Business/development focus group meeting • June 10 — Public meeting #2 (virtual visioning session) • June 10 to July 10 — Online visioning survey • July 5 — Stakeholder steering committee meeting • July 21 — Community focus group A meeting • July 23 — Community focus group B meeting • August 3 — Public meeting #3 (in-person review of conceptual plans) 0 August 3 to 10 —Online survey for conceptual plans Looking ahead, the fourth and final public meeting will occur on September 22; this is scheduled to be an in-person open house format to review the final recommendations. Public hearings for the final master plan document are scheduled for October before the Planning Commission and City Council. In addition, project information has been made consistently available on the City's website, on What's Up Wheat Ridge (WUWR), in the Mayor's Matters newsletter, and the Connections newsletter. Engagement opportunities have been shared widely through print and social media, flyers at City buildings, email and word of mouth. As of the writing of this memo, there have been 1,844 unique visitors to the project page on WUWR. KEY THEMES Attached are the slides associated with the August 3 public meeting and online survey. This includes a summary of public input to -date and a summary of findings from the market and traffic studies. Key themes from public input so far include the following: • The importance of the history and legacy of the campus. • The opportunity to create a center for the community anchored by civic and cultural uses. • A desire for parks, open space and buffers with adjacent neighborhoods. • Both a concern and a desire for housing and increased connectivity. • Excitement for locally serving retail, dining and entertainment. A summary of input from the August 3 meeting and corresponding online survey will be shared at the study session; the survey closes on August 10. Technical analysis completed to date includes a market and traffic study. Key takeaways from the market study include the following: • There is a strong demand for a wide range of housing types (from residential to senior to multifamily). • There is limited demand for retail and the potential for cannibalizing sales from Wadsworth and 38th Avenue. • There is limited demand for office uses. • Employment -generating uses could come from medical office, civic, agricultural/culinary, and assisted living (senior care) uses. The preliminary concepts introduced to the public in August and in the enclosed attachment is based on public input and market realities. They do not yet contemplate if or how the transportation network may change (roads, sidewalks, bike lanes, signals). Those recommendations will be provided once there is a preferred land use concept. Because the hospital is a significant generator of vehicular trips, it is unlikely that any land use concept would meet or exceed the current trip generation. NEXT STEPS As noted above, the purpose of the August 19 study session is to provide an update on the project, to share public input to date, and to seek direction related to development of a preferred concept. 2 Based on August feedback, the consultant team will begin work on the draft master plan. A public open house is scheduled for September 22 to share the draft. Public hearings are scheduled for October 7 and October 25 before Planning Commission and City Council, respectively. ATTACHMENT: 1. Lutheran Legacy Campus — Slides from August 3 Public Meeting r r 'J•// City of Wheat idle SCL Health LUTHERAN Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan PUBLIC MEETING #3 108/03/2021 In association with: EPS I Fehr and Peers I The Abo Group ATTACHMENT 1 Meeting Agenda 5:30 — 5:35 Welcome and Introductions 5:35 — 6:05 Project Presentation • KeyThemes • Contexts & Considerations • Preliminary Alternatives BREAKOUT TOACTIVITYSTATIONS 6:05 — 6:55 6:55 — 7:00 Activity Stations Summary and Next Steps ELutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan City of W heat Midge =11 SCL Health ,r LUTHERAN AN. ;.�•.,. '., �' +., „ 'qF F •'�, �:. i r - � j @+,A,� ••S Iii. . $�' — ,. -, . , �, ,. '> ' . ,�` ,; " ,,' ' .may., _, : �. ..�. '. ,.- .. °� 4.,,. - , ' ';: ar• - rel" r wm- _ C amm ._.. ,:, :W•-�' 4" ., 61 1r .. ! x,rr y*k-n �. ,.d u - � °„ ,•,"' •�, s '� - -' � 'j � ' - 7 :. .. - _ _, D — �� " � ', "':`'. R '+ . ♦ i .�.,, . I. r ,.� .l .� ,s � �... , ^....,: F � .+1...1i '.���< 4, .) r - �,�}_TI r, " u �r�. ,S�` y ,;;, �"�.`�r �r �. �, „ X14. �� ,�':. • �. x c :.. .. ,*. 1 ,' o_. ...*. 1� ( ,� ea',' ,,�„� - a I a f jj w AW— t, ,a..- .. n .. . . " � �. - .,,", ♦ � aF -.» r. �... , �1i � ' F' c ''� _ ' {'� 1 ( IRI` � �yf .s m.. �. � .):- ::. iae. r .,' �- P4?>sY .gr,4 • : ... , . ..' r 1- - eF i�� `�- � , � c.:: �� ,.+ir � , a. � '�, i t. � �` ,, rpJi , z ;� * -®'�I • ms's, I" z -+f' - �+ �°: _ - - r � � _ `watop 38t Avenue -� ♦ "� y _. , rw, .,� .F71+.,n �r,, - Ile;^ c D s- s' _( - 1r TV 4 •;:n Y O ' Wn x �s { _ Z r• r � , 1 ., �_J .:_,� �i''i 1. X11 _ _ • '. :.+a i _ [I _ -�. -'�= •��i'F:. „ - , ';.r: ���� "3 . ,, ry�iN - •1' •:. ,�:, � •�.. ':r: ..�:�'� 'a,.y .- - � 1 _ �. r.`".:�— I � s.' wwi'i a t+'•` N�"- - rA � , Y. , ve u e ON; AMP- WIT, ,y d 1� y •.wrJF,t�:. :, r i7, {, � -. Q :� �. Y � � -F� '� ., - 1 -� 9d a � r. r .. ,f , lF. , h^ M .,r t ( , 1 WW� 4 a:�Rs Fr'�' � z ti+F a ^ r _ ` f z .� r �- +y , e ,+' rA. ♦"qu ' _' '� � .��(� � e fit :: - .. ® � - _�, .i "'�I eek., � fl � �� _ �� � f � •x ` �;. � .—,_ , � _ �`�. ,` ... �'--• „� .� , ,: r'. ;' ', > .:. ;, _ 'fie � .' `i+ ': .., �. ' II a q/ 32nd ^ I , Avenue ,ri r 3 2 - - _ �y! , ` !F ^r';4. �' ,wr.. , .aw ,.. _, ._ ,, �'". y. ,. � =b "-•: .. ;, QCa.. ; I X- � - - ..,..t!` - p.�r ,� � -"". l e Y!;"s' - ei Rr1r r'f a,.i a �`':, �, h"''�^� �1�, .,. ....:;�• � ,'-..: *'.°:.. ''i -' •_ � ... ,. b�, � u•y,, yu., �. ",, ,F::., .. , ,,, -w . ":. �.-r,., •{' ._ _ s• moo` w _n1..A:. R_` 17: "ter. .�'»' il4i� ,fie' f: sin F-1 t' _ � ., ,, � , , � r,�y i zm �` ' '� „ i� �Dsr , 1 - iP �— 4, ; �_- �. 1 7!! , � �✓ ta+ t, _ ya. •�*�Fr. 1 i ' � ` -� �,y # -- Z �' � .-, . , {"�-♦.r., -, � � °,.., ...� :, .:+ti�`1'9'7i ,i.11 r f ,F�. 1 .,r- � - - f � ® `'' i- — .. Structure Plan The Structure Plan corresponds with the community vision and keyva!ues. It provides strategic guidance for the future redevelopment of Wheat Ridge. 1. ASSETS -Parks and Open Space 1 Public - 's,� �i J 2. FOUNDATION Neighborhoods see Chapter 3 criteria for Eiffererent Neighborhootl types 11111► Neighborhood 4— Buffer Area 0 z 0 Corridor 38TH AVE 32ND AVE I I -r^ i Kipling Corridor -P r 1 ZrM The Structure Plan provides strategic guidance for future development and redevelopment efforts. The categories displayed on the Structure Plan show the general locations of desired future land us(s, but the map symbols "Ipecially corridor widths and sizes of activity centers) re 'rot irtended to depict precise boundaries. I Connects to Arvada ✓ -I' �l Cj Jr- 245L - 26TH AVE 1"� _l± _ -____• av7 Connects o nnec of Wheat is ce aDepot R e9 c I hs r o+ _ sport r u D Rey nal Cn ncil et overran nt , «ate it -L:_. .. - `y -- 0-n Associates Please see Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan for a description of Assets, Foundations, Corridors, Gateways, and Activity Centers 3. CORRIDORS, GATEWAYS t �• •• Primary _- Main Street _ Neighborhood / J Primary ■ Mixed -Use Employment Mixed -Use Commercial i• Corridor with i Commercial Gateway Commercial Em to ment Corridor NOghborhooC Portals Corridor w,. Neighborhootl Portals l' Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan 4. ACTIVITY CENTERS Regional Commercial Center >� R. - Community Commercial Center Neighborhood `J Commercial Center i Employment/ Commercial Center Primary Employment Center of W heat �dge =I'm SCL Health ,r LUTHERAN Wadsworth Corridor 44TH AVE it T it 'Z J: ! ! - _. Connects to 38TH AVE_ \/ate tr6e,t-R"� Highland! iosp Ill! 32ND AVE Z R Cj Jr- 245L - 26TH AVE 1"� _l± _ -____• av7 Connects o nnec of Wheat is ce aDepot R e9 c I hs r o+ _ sport r u D Rey nal Cn ncil et overran nt , «ate it -L:_. .. - `y -- 0-n Associates Please see Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan for a description of Assets, Foundations, Corridors, Gateways, and Activity Centers 3. CORRIDORS, GATEWAYS t �• •• Primary _- Main Street _ Neighborhood / J Primary ■ Mixed -Use Employment Mixed -Use Commercial i• Corridor with i Commercial Gateway Commercial Em to ment Corridor NOghborhooC Portals Corridor w,. Neighborhootl Portals l' Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan 4. ACTIVITY CENTERS Regional Commercial Center >� R. - Community Commercial Center Neighborhood `J Commercial Center i Employment/ Commercial Center Primary Employment Center of W heat �dge =I'm SCL Health ,r LUTHERAN Task 1: Proiect Management and Coordination Task Public Task 3. Background, Vision and M I G input Phase 1 Community and Stakeholder Engagement • Public Meeting #1: Self -Guided Campus Tour • Stakeholder Steering Committee Meetings • City County and Planning Commission Study Sessions, Round 1 • Neighbor, Community and Business Focus Groups, Round 1 • Public Meeting #2: Virtual, Visioning • Online Survey, Visioning • Facilities Focus Group Tour • Email and Phone Questions and Comments ■ Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan Sample Focus Group Recording =11111w Envision Wheat Ridge Reslient Local Vibrant Quality 1r SCL Health LUTHERAN CAMPUS FOCUS GROUPS Economy Neighborhoods Community Transportation Ensure Key Values Based on a and an Array of Character and Connections Amenities, Sustainable Balanced Mix Housing Quality Design and Options Services, and Future of Uses Options Resources Group A Questions or Concerns Group B Questions or Concerns RAWp if comme tial, ditch has connectivity, been bike, ped access / ` m want to see restricted and naretyina may not fit +1 / y 2 local _rem concern businesses, not overall character dont add traffic Inima just narl chains of WR to aborrhodjacet edge as a height wad. n't went to neighborhoods open spat outside our concern about safer access detract from other back door ecting to property businesses nearby high density ccdudleym a adn to crown _ 38THAVENVE housing amcorsu(o hill - formalize r,-. y am:. -`,,, y.; � i.;r ry ^^h, rs (this inn to Bel Mar) Dote traffic moree tats neighborhood) g In l.:�- housing at height might n" connectivity e t f.c �, fl6„ • r to 38th Ur— housing hborhood Y ,.$ _ :r. -' � A. Y4� � � be okay if it's r ar low density we awes in the middle lots of dogs, ® berm serves - no dopark need to account O� as buffer want ` ;I'y se , 1 f,� Q kt y / JL,& ' �� - � 1 - park/pley a ent Mellings/ totrendy sufficiently for to rete n berm.. — - 1�-.. 6' S,ir = rj( f ! areas a Flyers i parking so it ® on dudley T �` r L avin - "y ,,'y4_} T1f open space aide f' i'� t e ! (Beyond advert slog doesnt overflow r d'`t r r'+ i, r.o- onl net concern with into adjacent +1 U; n print as putting neighborhoods idea ofa a - I �n t '.' 1 �, 3i 1- a. much as housing for 1ic'4 I ,. y �: is g expand key possible expand in - homelessness person t q�� r 7 C values options in on campus S �. , ' ^3 In F +In = ovlD tL'14{ lc�►j� ,- 7l� a m OpportunitiesY;;, ^; �, Opportunities y L parking (possible gated resdens �ryr hi r�, 1 sM,�',• ij trans[ garage] to family tom„unity +1 wy., rrt u ,�""� 4 (raerskpc&open we don't have opporunniesprevent spl➢over �friendly component- public space-. , 'A ace sidewalks, but tow, Denten lowerdensity t -z "commons” park •- i s :-r>: i .y neighborhoods stores movies on the playground `, .�'.. - we don't need lawn, ret ��; +1 sidewalks o center, farmers 1y t [Here are raniaemn who are market i place for i® mpimeatner ok with h'gner densry y- ... ,.,.,,, ., �, , f kids to play view looking keep character of wheat nnnsng rts hard to find - r . O south at omplementary ridge - couple stories, housng low, —ant) u,s 7, r ,i�A1 Tower of c Businesses doesn't look too prefab model efor othetexampies dog park m¢robrewery +, kI_ ' 7t n, Memories play fields of good d -igen - want to gative ® �'''�;jg'�: . sidewalks to ao notation associated •y connect us wuh density some are not L : ... y' •+ to it opposed to N 32ND AVENUE keep +1 higtry neighborhood il�, community mixofbusinesses, �® housing walkable _ _ character small businesses n1,^ gathering owned businesses, retail, I hbornood �� feel higher density/ entertainment- iter to mainsrant, coffee retail, seg old town arvada or golden - restaurant, coffee -can feel, multiple high density intensity Could evo something to walk toe take kids, do destlnation. not always +1 gear towards g, walk, perks work if done on me perimeter an low Campus Map right and walkable/bikeable In2 me (good ex. it JR 8loan's Lake & stepped down Downtown) near enighbors Community Focus Groups #1— Key Takeaways • Strong focus on public amenities: dog parks, community gathering spaces, amphitheater, play fields, recreation center, farmers market • Provide connectivity to existing destinations without increasing number of vehicles on site through safe -multimodal options. • Higher density housing that transitions with mixed use • Main street feel with destinations • Maintain neighborhood character and ensure site is family friendly • Priority Community Amenities • Community gathering spots • Amphitheater, play fields, recreation center, farmers market, playgrounds Community Focus Groups #2 — Key Takeaways • Focus on examining reuse of existing facilities • Have density transition from center to edges • Implement multi -modal transportation while considering impacts on vehicular traffic, with emphasis on walkability • Mixed-use setting that can become city's "center of gravity"with relocated services • Maintain existing natural features and enhance connections internally • Architecturally stimulating, no sterile high rises • Not a primary employment center • Priority Community Amenities • Library, Dog Park, and Water features Business Focus Groups — Key Takeaways • Increase heights to allow for more housing and open space • Having housing transition from less dense on the perimeter to denser in the center • Mixed-use and affordable housing that serves a variety of people • Ensure connectivity to existing open space and commercial corridor • Free public amenities • Quality commercial product • Consider using historic tax credits • Priority Community Amenities • Library • Open space Focus Groups — Common Themes and Values • Create density that transitions from the edge to the center to ensure compatibility with adjacent neighborhoods • Create a mixed-use environment that transitions seamlessly between uses and builds off existing infrastructure • Promote safe multimodal connections that does not exacerbate traffic • Provide a variety of free, public amenities that incorporates existing natural features • Build a variety of housing that serves a diversity of people Public Meeting #2 (Virtual) • Thursday, June 10th, from 6:30 — 8:OOPM • Over 50 attendees • Focus on visioning, roles and uses • Launch of the online survey Structure Plan A t ry y a 1. ASSETS J � 2. FOUNDATION ro _.� OF� p■E .......c. u..=... .... 3. CORRIDORS,GATEWAYS ■ „... N�..,a. Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan 4. ACTIVITY CENTERS` cT� U 0 C.- !fit ■ Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan ©u;0 Online Survey TRAFFIC VisiLorsSummary Whats! p Whea-Ridge from 07JL! 112 1 TO C6Ja1'2 2W Im r Jun'L1 N"., In 11J,, 21 TRAFFIC Visitors Summary 'f'haC'sUp`.h'hea. Ridge Born 13`efr'2.o CC, U 21 200 100 814a, 21 22Mar 21 *Select a sectlon of thegraph to zoom Highlights DAILY MONTHLY NEW TOTAL VISITS MAX VISITORS PER DAY REGISTRATIONS 560 61 4 ENGAGED VISITORS INFORMED VISITORS AWARE VISITORS 49 171 394 ].J on 11 sJw z1 Highlights DAILY MONTHLY NEW VISITS MAX VISITORS PER DAY REGISTRATIONS �TOTAL 2.1 k 119 27 ENGAGED VISITORS INFORMED VISITORS AWARE VISITORS 60 484 1.4 k SApr'21 19Apr 21 3May '21 17 May 21 31 May 21 19 Jun 21 28 Jun 21 _ Pageviews _ Visitors _ Visits _ New Regi=trat. ons When considering ZONE 1, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? "BLANK are an appropriate use" Single -Family Homes Duplexes, Triplexes orTownhomes 38 Apartments or Condominiums Open Space Civic or Office Retail or Dining In Entertainment Another Use ___0 Q10 When considering Zone 1, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? mryn� aa„a pp A®I Dugs. T,- 0- p es0p spaw Is an ap rwtl uca 1 - Y l t 1 011" 10 d y < y' r Am x v l r . •..nz a y` - ow t.,'',<4�i�+'°`4�`',.,} e ;��` k :,�� r „a'13,t� _r •.. �� �� ::�,•+ !, � �_ 1_.—_ �:$9r .iS`-+i'34 f —711 • • • • • • • • • • f - ZONE 3� . ,,:: w. .,�v�• z ` ZONE ZONE • • • �s- �F.; �. G srte,- ''- M: When considering ZONE 3, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? "BLANK are an appropriate use" Single -Family Homes Duplexes, Triplexes orTownhomes 29 Apartments or Condominiums Open Space Civic orOffice Retail or Dining Entertainment Another Use to 3, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? 45t MIN� - ... When considering ZONE 4, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? "BLANK are an appropriate use" Single -Family Homes Duplexes, Triplexes orTownhomes Apartments or Condominiums Open Space Civic or Office IID Retail or Dining Entertainment Another Use c4, how much do you agree or disagree with the following statements? ®®� F * Ei R - City of Key Themes from the Visioning Phase wheatl�i'dge Ji SCL Health ,r LUTHERAN • Role: • Continued open space by maintaining existing natural features • Community center that is compatible with existing neighborhoods and upholds the site's history • Mixed-use site that provides business and employment opportunities • Housing diversity focused on low-mid density • Community benefits: • Dog Park • Library • Childcare ■ Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan • Bike facilities • Artist Center/district • Gardens • Educational facilities IM I GI - City of Key Themes from the Visioning Phase wheatl�i'dge Ji SCL Health ,r LUTHERAN • Importance of the history and legacy of the campus • Opportunity to create a center for the community, anchored by civic and cultural uses • Desire for parks, open space and buffers with the adjacent neighbors • Both concern and desire for housing and increased connectivity • Excitement for potentially local -serving retail, dining and entertainment ELutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan consi context & cl e rati ons Common Starting Points • Existing Regulatory Considerations: • New residential development is limited to 35' in height • New non-residential development is limited to 50' in height • Height restrictions do not apply to adaptive reuse • If rezoned, undercurrent Charter limits, the full site could absorb up to 2,100 residential units • Non -Developable Area Assumptions: • Approximately 6.OAC of Rocky Mountain Ditch will likely remain in place • The Foothills M.O.B. (2.5AC) and Collier Hospice (5.OAC) will remain in place as their existing uses • Approximately 7.5AC of major roadways will likely remain in place • The North Tower and requisite parking (W) could be adaptively reused • The existing on-site (medical) office program is the largest the market will absorb — that use and requisite parking requires approximately 6.75AC • Therefore, 69.25AC remain of potential redevelopment or new uses What the Market says • Residential • Strong demand for wide variety of housing types (single family to multifamily) • Master Planned project could absorb the housing unit cap of 2,100 units over a 10 year build out • Retail/Commercial • Limited demand for retail (less than 50,000 sf) without anchor use(s) • Potential to compete with or cannibalize sales from Wadsworth/38th Avenue • Orientation near 38th Avenue and with public gathering spaces What the Market says • Office/Employment • Not a strong traditional office location. • New, larger office building (over 40,000 sf) development likely not feasible • Maintaining the Employment Legacy • Keep existing MOBS with diversified user mix • Explore potential for agricultural/culinary type uses • Civic employment • Continuum of health care associated with housing products What the Traffic says • When comparing the existing uses to a Base Market Development Scenario: Scenario Conditions Base Market Development Scenario Change AM IPM 1.2751 1 1,0011 1 -2741 -377 Potential Improvements • Modify unsignalized intersections • Signalize stop -controlled intersections • Modify signalized intersection • Extend turn lane length • Change signal timing (time of day plans) • Add turn lane • Add access into site • E.g. Create east -west connection by extending 35th Avenue into the site through Dudley Street F Potential Multimodal Connections, Programs, and Policies • Transportation Demand Management • Parking pricing and supply • Transit passes • Commuter incentives • Bike parking • Improve bicycle and pedestrian connectivity • Bike lanes • Complete sidewalk network • Enhanced crossings • Better connections to bus stops alternatives Concept A Existing Use to Remain OLow Density Residential Toxmhome Residential Q Multifamily Residental Office 0 Mixed Use 0 Cioic Retail Park! Openspace Pocky Mountain Ditch 11111 I Ground Floor Retail Edge >� Primary Ci¢ulation �Connection to Existing Road Network Adaptive Reuse Community Gathering 0 325 250 500 OFeet 3zHu '(OWNWME 4G0AcFs Low D",T5 341'N I=Aptn 0 0 6 38TH o a y MuLTr f::AMtLq t \ 13ID j s "fir 141DAcv�s � I �iGSnNCr I � 51dA�s i lcnraw j5 iiH 3cl& 33RD 0 Key Elements in Concept A • Retail/Dining edge along 38t"Avenue • Low -Density Residential mirroring existing housing on the west side of Dudley Street • Large, Civic Core • West Pines Behavioral Health remaining in place as existing use • Small, distributed open spaces supporting adjacent new and existing uses x n. a ,t - '}. ° ... -jam ., .. f- � �g _ � '.•�_ �• y' �r r- Y 1 F. Cone toA em Iv. lz AiL L v 9 r. A . t 'i w �s. Co t IF w „` -•�4 yr S., Ali � I �:.: 21 L --___o k .��- 'i�''•.�"'� fly... f /�t _ ��� .. .107 6rs r[li Y: ��' a ��• as "O L --___o k .��- 'i�''•.�"'� fly... f /�t _ ��� .. .107 6rs / �® F Concept 6 Exisfing Use to Remain Low Density Residential Toxmhome Residential Multifamily Residenfial Office O Mixed Use Cleic Retail Park! Openspace Rocky Mountain Ditch 11111 I Ground Floor Retail Edge O Primary Ci¢ulation �Connection to Existing Road Network z Adaptive Reuse Community Gathering o 125 250 500 O Feet W 0 O O O O 38rH z 0 a r•J PARx 4.IoAc� I rr o43oAc€Eswl =9% Mrr(60 use IIV AIAW; LILTI , 10LOAcg% v 'ZESVR5NnAr. 14.4oAmv �wsrtJrs 51DAc�s j .. 3 35iH 3cl& 33RD 0 Key Elements in Concept 6 • Large, Mixed -Use destination north of the Rocky Mountain Ditch • Diverse and distributed housing products • Small civic, and office presence • Open space on the eastern and western 35th avenue alignments x n. a - 'j- � ... � -jam ., .. f - �� �g _ � '.•�_ �• y' �r " r- Y -� C006p;B y. ®R AL- ANNEWSM-1 1111 K- 'a. u. a , /ft i a : - Cone _ ,'� �' - �' ,, -- �'�' ~rpt �•' �y '�@ - - $ ,. - r or,® IL Concept C Existing Use to Remain OLow Density Residential Toxmhome Residential Q Multifamily Residental Office Mixed Use Cleic Retail Park! Openspace Rocky Mountain Ditch 11111 I Ground Floor Retail Edge Primary Ci¢ulation �Connection to Existing Road Network Adaptive Reuse Community Gathering o 125 250 500 O Feet W 0 O O � 33rH 0 � v i - r- .._..... ws Civic Cil w# 2EdA>� .3cdAcrts, 4abdtx�s i, r . MuLTt �iwtay 61AAr� i fl'ZoA 34!H % *' MHrr FpµrLK SIE .. ✓.�W �EN6rvY R�� I �wsrtJrs I -1&-mL �Z&Acg% VA ZX Z,q.W 35TH 3cl& 33RD 0 IIII_ 7 low wnwoi mm— iuirtuu ��j 4L n:. �. • J f Y ��=! R' ,L� _ fit♦ �• � '_ R• � V - i=Os�. .�►/ � � 7� 3 _ �.� c .., � F � [ F 4�c,.a-.1a�w�'a- "1 + ALIX'sx , � l�a m w f � e y f CO n t�C � _�� -.4 1, —_ � � .•� � �$ � moi, � �:_ too Aro$ 3 . p — ae r ` Ail _', � � '�1�.�= S , Po ql' •'tee i ��. J rALt 0 ' F v Phase 2 Community and Stakeholder Engagement • Neighbor, Community and Business Focus Groups, Round 2 • Public Meeting #3: Preliminary Alternatives • Parallel Online Engagement • City Council and Planning Commission Study Sessions, Round 2 • Stakeholder Steering Committee Meeting • Public Meeting #4: Final Recommendations ■ Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan r r 'J•// City of Wheat idle SCL Health LUTHERAN Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan PUBLIC MEETING #3 108/03/2021 In association with: EPS I Fehr and Peers I The Abo Group