HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-16-211.
2.
3.
4.
City of
]� W heat�cdge
PLANNING COMMISSION
Minutes of Meeting
September 16, 2021
CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chair LARSON at 7:01 p.m. This meeting was held
in person and virtually, using Zoom video -teleconferencing technology. As duly
announced and publicly noticed, the City previously approved this meeting format in
order to continue with normal business amid the COVID-19 pandemic and the related
public emergency orders promulgated by the State of Colorado and the Wheat Ridge City
Council. Before calling the meeting to order, the Chair stated the rules and procedures
necessitated by this virtual meeting format.
ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS
Commission Members Present:
Commission Members Absent
Staff Members Present
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Melissa Antol
Kristine Disney
Will Kerns
Ari Krichiver
Daniel Larson
Janet Leo
Scott Ohm
Jahi Simbai
Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager
Zareen Tasneem, Planner I
Robin Eaton, Deputy City Clerk
APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA
It was moved by Commissioner ANTOL and seconded by Commissioner LEO to
approve the order of the agenda as amended. Motion carried 7-0.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — September 2, 2021
Planning Commission Minutes
September 16, 2021
-1—
It was moved by Commissioner OHM and seconded by Commissioner DISNEY to
approve the minutes of September 2, 2021, as written. Motion carried 5-0-2 with
Commissioners KRICHIVER and KERNS abstaining.
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing
on the agenda.)
Vivian Vos, resident
6920 W. 4711 Place
Ms. Vos spoke of the most previous City Council meeting and the subdivision that was
approved in a MU -N zone district. She mentioned there was a lot of discussion amongst
the City Council members and explained the subdivision is not welcomed by the
neighbors. She would like to see design plans given to the Planning Commission and City
Council members.
Chair LARSON closed the Public Forum.
7. PUBLIC HEARING
A. Case No. WZ-21-05: an application filed by David Heller for approval of a zone
change from Residential -Two (R-2) to Mixed Use -Neighborhood (MU -N) for the
property located at 4535 Wadsworth Boulevard.
Ms. Tasneem gave a short presentation regarding the zone change and the
application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet
materials, the zoning ordinance, and the contents of the digital presentation. She
stated the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the
Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case.
Commissioner KRICHIVER asked if the setbacks are a product of the proposed
zoning.
Ms. Tasneem confirmed the setbacks are compliance with the requirements of the
MU -N zone district.
Commissioner ANTOL wanted clarification on the difference between Mixed Use -
Commercial (MU -C) and MU -N.
Ms. Tasneem mentioned there is some MU -N to the north of said property. She
added MU -N is for small neighborhood corridor types of uses and Mixed Use -
Commercial (MU -C) is more intense with its uses. Ms. Mikulak added that the
other zone districts: Neighborhood Commercial (NC) and Restricted Commercial
(RC), in the area, are legacy districts which have been around since before the City
existed and the code does not allow zone changes to those districts anymore. These
Planning Commission Minutes -2—
September
2—
September 16, 2021
zone districts are limited in their land uses which is closest to the MU -N zone
district.
Commissioner DISNEY is curious why the applicant does not know how they will
use the property if the zone change is approved.
David Heller, applicant
730 W. Alameda, Lakewood
Mr. Heller explained that he purchased the property for future opportunity for
development which could happen 7-10 years down the road.
Commissioner KERNS asked if the church is still active.
Mr. Heller explained it is currently vacant but is a permitted use in the MU -N zone
district, adding that MU -N will allow for a wider range of uses.
Commissioner LARSON inquired about leasing the building as a residence.
Mr. Heller said that is not his focus based on the configuration of the interior space.
Commissioner LARSON asked for clarification on the definition of unplatted in
the context of the staff report.
Ms. Tasneem explained that this property never went through a subdivision
process.
Commissioner KRICHIVER is curious about why the applicant was asking for this
change now if not developing for 7-10 years.
Mr. Heller explained he is interested in participating in the redevelopment of the
Wadsworth Road Improvement Project and is aware that will take a couple of years
until completion. Ms. Mikulak explained the premise of a speculative zone change
and explained the other zone change options. Mr. Heller's only other option was to
go to a Planned Development zone district, and he would have had to know what
his plan would be moving forward. She explained the purpose of planned
developments and that they can be high risk and very expensive. There are no
unique circumstances warranting a planned development for this parcel, and it
cannot be rezoned to RC or NC. Ms. Mikulak reiterated that staff did not
recommend MU -C because it is too intensive for this segment of the corridor.
In response to a question from Commissioner ANTOL about how much right-of-
way will be taken for the Wadsworth Road Improvement Project, Ms. Mikulak said
all property acquisitions have been completed along the entire Wadsworth Corridor
and the width varies from property to property and about 20 feet of width along the
eastern property line will be taken from this property which is more than average
Planning Commission Minutes -3—
September
3—
September 16, 2021
because the road shifts in this area to accommodate the potentially historic property
across the street.
Commissioner KERNS asked if this church carries any historic designation. He
also inquired about how many stories would be in a 35 -foot and 50 -foot -high
building.
Ms. Mikulak said it is not on any historic register and was not flagged through the
federal process for Wadsworth as being historic. Staff confirmed a 35 -foot
residential building could be 3 stories and a 50 -foot commercial building is usually
3 stories as well because commercial floorplates are usually closer to 12 feet in
height.
Public Comment
Vivian Vos, resident
6920 W. 47t' Place
Ms. Vos is concerned about the speculative nature of the zone change and that an
unknown development could result in multiple townhomes in a subdivision. She
also thinks the church is historic and likes the size of the gym.
Commissioner LARSON closed the public comment.
Commissioner DISNEY is a little nervous about the unknown development that
can go on this property but is not worried if it will be housing because it is on the
Wadsworth corridor and she does believe it needs to be rezoned from a residential
district.
Commissioner OHM asked if there will be a center median on Wadsworth. He
also inquired about the rezoning process in general.
Ms. Mikulak confirmed there will be a center median. She also explained that staff
receives frequent inquiries about zone changes and more often than not staff
discourages rezoning. If staff believe they can support a zone change, then the first
step in the process would be a pre -application meeting with staff, followed by a
neighborhood meeting. If the applicant wants to move forward, they will
eventually need to go through two public hearings with Planning Commission and
City Council.
Commissioner ANTOL thinks it is very important to allow reinvestment, especially
on the Wadsworth Corridor.
Commissioner KRICHIVER believes there is no logical use for this property under
the current zoning and believes a zone change is warranted and it makes sense.
Planning Commission Minutes -4—
September
4—
September 16, 2021
Commissioner LARSON asked what uses are not allowed under the MU -N zoning.
He also asked the applicant to keep the property well maintained.
Ms. Tasneem and Ms. Mikulak shared that higher level, intense commercial uses
are not allowed including but not limited to very large retail spaces, many auto -
oriented uses and industrial uses.
It was moved by Commissioner OHM and seconded by Commissioner
DISNEY to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-21-05, a request for
approval of a zoned change from Residential -Two (R-2) to Mixed -Use
Neighborhood (MU -N) for property located at 4535 Wadsworth Boulevard,
for the following g reasons:
1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or
welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on
the surrounding area.
2. Utility infrastructure adequately services the property.
3. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of
the City's Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the character of
Wadsworth Boulevard.
4. The zone change will provide additional opportunity for reinvestment
in the area.
5. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change supports a request.
Motion carried 7-0.
B. ZOA-21-03: an ordinance amending Chapter 26 9f the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws
concerning letter notice to property owners and occupants for land use
applications.
Ms. Mikulak gave a short presentation regarding letter notice to property owners
and occupants for land use applications.
Public Comment
No one wished to speak at this time.
Commissioner LARSON closed the public comment.
In response to a question from Commissioner KERNS, Ms. Mikulak explained that
the only change to the letter notice within the existing 600 -foot radius is who will
receive the letter, which will be property owners and occupants. She added that PO
Boxes are not included; the letter will go to all physical addresses and owner
mailing addresses.
Commissioner OHM inquired about the language of the proposed motion.
Planning Commission Minutes -5—
September
5—
September 16, 2021
Ms. Mikulak said the recommended motion mimics the ordinance title.
Commissioner KRICHIVER asked who the 3rd party is that the occupant addresses
will come from.
Ms. Mikulak said she can't remember the name. She mentioned this option was
explored a year ago with our Let's Talk program.
Commissioner KRICHIVER also wondered if changes to the fee or frequency of
data purchase will require another code amendment.
Ms. Mikulak clarified that it will not require another code change. She added that
City Council can approve fee changes as part of the annual budget process.
Commissioner LARSON wondered why the Post Office cannot give staff a list of
mailboxes in the area.
Ms. Mikulak explained the challenges and reasons to have staff manage the address
pull process to ensure it meets legal requirements.
It was moved by Commissioner KRICHIVER and seconded by Commissioner
ANTOL to recommend approval of the proposed ordinance amending
Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws concerning letter notice to
property owners and occupants for land use applications as outlined in case
number ZOA-21-03.
Motion carried 7-0.
8. OLD BUSINESS
9. NEW BUSINESS
A. Upcoming Dates
Ms. Mikulak mentioned that both October Planning Commission dates will have
cases to hear. She also status updates regarding births and maternity/paternity
leave within the department.
B. Ms. Mikulak said that Council had recently awarded the construction contract for
the Wadsworth Improvement Project and there would be a groundbreaking date in
October.
Planning Commission Minutes -6—
September
6—
September 16, 2021
10. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Commissioner DISNEY and seconded by Commissioner KERNS to
adjourn the meeting at 8:23 p.m. Motion carried 7-0.
4ajnLarson, Chair Tammy O n, Recording Secretary
Planning Commission Minutes -7—
September
7—
September 16, 2021