Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WZ-19-03
_?030173453--.— --------/ -3D 2oa0 2'Y7- 9Anr _ ��o o✓rza�o CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JstS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC. MIX=_DELISE DEVELOPMENT 15 TO REHABILITATE TH5 FOF3TER GRAVEL NINE 51?E INTO 4 VIBRANT M!X OF COMMERCIAL. RETAIL AND RESIDENT AL USES SURROUNDING A PRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE 4 VITAL AND 'LI I=E 4r I,17Y FOR THE RE DENTS AND PATRONS OF t1.:S GE✓ELOFMEN7 AND THE GREATER COMA'UNIT1`. THE HIGHLY V1518LE RECREATIONAL ACTiVMES OCCU'Rtr, CN THE LAKE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRI'", ARY GAT W4v AeF`ECT Cl THIS DEVELOI-ENT. THE PROIJECT PROPOSES TRANSIT SJPPORTIvE USES AND DENS!T E9 GIVEN T4E PRCxln T- TO THE as!EAT R;. -E - WARD S`.ATION. A RESIDENTIAL CO.-!MJNiTY IS PROPOSED FOR THE UPPER FLAMNiIYs AREA (PA!) WITH RETAIL AMENMES. THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITEiCPQP^RAFHY TC PROVIDE v.EIUB TO THE LAKEFRONT. T»E L XIER PENNSULA SITE M PLANNING A -,MA (PA3) 15 PROPOSED TO CON',A!N RETAIL. THE DESIGN 'LATENT FOR M5 AREA i5 TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE WATER -FRONT LOCATION .AND SITE VI9IBILIT-FROM'.-10 TO SHOU�ASE WATER '.><ORTS- TH:5 ACTDV:TY NODE WOJLD AL50 SERVE TO CRE47E A GATEWAY- INTO THE CITY'. THE KEY PROXIMITY AND vISIBIL!TY OF THIS DEVELOP". IEN' ?O 714E I ---Cl WARD ROAD.AND WHEAT RIDGE -WARD 5'.AT;CN :A TDOR5 WILL OF --ER :A UNIQUE LEVEL OF 'VITALITY AND COMMUN'.TY SYNERGY THAT WILL BE FJRTHER ENHANCED BY THE OVERALL CCMFLEI- NTART' ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CC!'G-kIN'!T DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH F' aNNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WZ-Ig_v- I STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DE`/FLO-MNT PLAN 15 CONCEPTUAL M NATURE, SPECIFIC DE'VELOR ENT ELEME!NTE £UCH. AS SITE LA"OIJT AND BUILDING AHwHITEGTlRE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED CH THIS )OCb!•^EENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFZ DEVELOPMENT PLAN -J5T BE 8UBC1!TTED AND APPROVED BY THE CIT 7 OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF =R154T-OF-WAY OBUILDING BUILDIG � 1 PERMIT APPLICATION AND ANY 5UBSEQU.'ENT SITE DEVELOFT-1ENi. J DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1 ALL PARKING AND LOADING SHALL BE iN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-10S CF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LA'W9, WITH THE FOLLCW!^iG MODIFICATIONS / ADDITIONS: PARCM, FOR MULTI-'J5E BUILDINGS W,MLO BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF BUILDINGS. AND AND 9TRIJCTURED PARKING 15 ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACT!011.. FREE-STANDING C0!'t'EF-_lAL ELWLD!NGB MIM PROVIDE 5URFACE FAR<IN's AT A RATE TO BE PETER-IINED BASED ON THE 5PECISC PROPOSED USE. 6!CY'r_LE PARKING AND vE141OfiLAR w^AD!1•Cs FCR PASSENGERS AND, AS APPROPRIATE, MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE PRO'✓ (DEED M aO5EE PROXIM:TY TO THE FRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR AL L PRIMARY STRUCTURES. SERVICE LOADING AREAS FCR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPING AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCT!ON5 SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMAR- ENTRANCE. ALL EXTERioR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN C ONFOR' •.ANGE WITH SECTION 26-50:! OF THE LIS TEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAM. ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CCWFOWANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE Q;.TH ARTICLE V:i OF THE WHEAT Ritz CODE OF LAWS. BILLPAAb ARE : RCHIBITED. ARCHITECT!' RAL, SITE. AND STREETSCAPE PEESGN 5HALL EE IN C:XdFC d',ANCE WITH THE ARC F+iTECTJR4L AND SITE DESIGN rANUAL (A5Dr" AND 57REETSC4PE DE$VL rA,NUAL OUTDOOR 6TOR4 E: BOATS AND INVENTORY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS IN PA -2 COMPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION 26 -629 - STANDARDS FOR ACCE55ORY 5-RJCTJRES, ACOE950RY 9iRUCTURE9 SHALL BE ALCOVED, F'ROVICED THAT TOTAL Fi.00R AREA OF ACCESSORY STRIXTURES SHALL. NOT EXCEED 'DENT'.' PERCENT O-- T. Z FOOTPRNT PCCUPIED BY THE PRIMARY STRJCPJRE OR STRUCTURES ON THE 5::BJECT LCT. ACCE55ORY BUILDINGS SHALL BE COMPRISED OF FOTd'S, MAiERlA� 5. AND COLOR`' THAT RE COMPATIBLE 'JIT14 THE ARC'.•r'ECTURAL QUALMEB OF THE ?BINARY g'J!LD'IN . GRI'✓E THRT$ ARE PROHIBITED PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM FvsILDIN'G CO✓:R'+rsE i 10 Y 6JILD t0 !-'.0 F -RCN'. AGE ROAD=22_ FRO' PQOPERT_UKE :2°b ; !°1JILD TG WARD ROAD ! D-22' FRCP: PROPERTY LINE M 3DX• _._. _.._....__.._____. T..___._.._._.. AXI'JLJJ B DWG 6EI - ! 20' MIN. 90' F!AX. i'aTC I ) —� � PLANNING- AREA 2, _ -1 MMP'UA'i SEBACG FRO*< PROPERTY ID' FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE I MAXIMUM BJ:LDING HEIGHT 35: MAx, (3 STCR_E5_____-- JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS 9, 10, 11 & TA NICHOLAS GARDENS, _ EP THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HMMAYIi, STATE OF COLORADO, 94 A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 2L US IN BOOK 1999 AT PAGE 306. A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANG 99 WEST OF THE 6th PAH. COUNTY O OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO CONTATNMO 2273 ACRES MORE OR LESS ( Qgoj Za SF WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION�,�yr4 VICINITY MAP: 0 60' Do, ?004 GRAPHIC SCALE: I' = 200'-0• PROJECT TEAM OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING -�_ -__--__-------- J A� SITE SPAL; , T. F 5 _ L_ INCLUDE A RIBLiCLY-ACCESSBLE MULTI -USE TRAIL CONNEC:!NG TO :HE CITY'S LINEAR AW, - - P, N THINK ?MIK 5D!O, INC, NORTH OF THE 1 -TD FRCAITA, ROAD. THEE FINAL LOCA1"ON, DESIGN, AND MAINTENANCE GBLIGA71ONa SHALL BE PO BCX 191 DE?ER1-!NEC AT T:M!E OF SDP AND PLAT REVIEJ THROUGH APPRC'✓�L OF CiNL CONSTRUCTION DO.^,..^1EN?9 AND FREDERICK, CC 90530 A 61,350 IS:ON IhrpRO'✓EMENS AGREEME'Ni. CONTACT: PATRCK BERREND E! THE S!*E SHALL iNCLUD-E A POND THAT i5 NO LESS THAN FiW_ ACRES IN SIZE, WHICH MAY ALSO SERVE AS A ^RCHITECT, NCARB A5 a STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT. IN THE EVENT OF A NATURAL REDUCTION N POND 3D3.9S0-9935 j SIZE(I.E. LONG= ER^ GRO.YaH;J THE AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS OPEN SPACE. IF A REDUCTION IN THE FOND SIZE (NATURAL OR MAN MADEi RESULTS IN A QUEST FOR INCREASED DEVELOPABLE LANG AREA FROM UN -T IS CIVIL E!iGO.EER: OIT L L OFIIEN RC DEPICTED ON SHEET 2 AN AMENDED O SHALL BE REQUIRED To F5TAB :SH DEVEL ''T STANDARDS, ACCESS. ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTANTS AND LAND USE CONCEP'B FOR THE A'vD1TIONA'�_ GE'VE_CPAEliE AREA d20 21" AVENUE C) LANDSCAPE COVERAGE FOR EAC14 DEVELOPABLE LOT IN PA -1 AND PA•2 SHALL BE AT L E45T B% AND 54ALL (393; l6A-9515 OTHER' BE IN CONFOR^14NCE WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE LYHE4T RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. DJ ARBORIST SHALL IDENTIFY ND -INVASIVE AND NCN-NU:SANCE 9PEC:E5 OF TREES TO BE -RESER/ED AND SUCH ANALYSIS SHA -L ACCOMPANY THE SDP WITH THE INTENT TO P'RESER'VE A HEALTHY AND MAIUFS 'REE CANOPY TO ! TEE -E/TENT FEASIBLE SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF STAFF AND FANNING COMMI55IRN. 0 60' Do, ?004 GRAPHIC SCALE: I' = 200'-0• PROJECT TEAM OWNER: ARG14ITAW, 1715B LAKE HOLDINGS, DLG N THINK ?MIK 5D!O, INC, 1919 SO:JTH LAKE E ROROAD PO BCX 191 LAKEWOOD, CO 92201 FREDERICK, CC 90530 CONTACT: MARK JOL57AD CONTACT: PATRCK BERREND 303.6!5-'0663 ^RCHITECT, NCARB 3D3.9S0-9935 SUF✓ET'CR' id1BURVEI CIVIL E!iGO.EER: 331?2 A. AIRPORT ROAD OA ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTANTS BOULDER COLORADO 90321 d20 21" AVENUE CCVTAC'•: RORER? RUBINO -LS LCNGMCN', CO 92521 R01 (393; l6A-9515 CONTACT: JOEL SEAMCN9. P.E. 3DB -65:-'v626 OWNER'S CF:R71!Tl;.4'fF. 71'6 bekw SQ%d .^.airo(:). x looy desY,eetw aganPs), it-Wf, It Mah, agae !ha! M,U PIWAY kgaIly dasrrbad lwr ,. -A 4e d i*99d as a %Mgd Dewacvffent n a—cla— wtn IM uses, reatY tbna am =Oto is ."Id it Pis DIeR a'd a- nT,y otie^nise a"i f9atifetl Y gw, i. ('Ae; fu;re^ reccgtize flet he a;gxa✓al cf a !ezorxly t� PlarraT Daaionatxt aprD ei of d s o axx cepa {Van dies rat Yeats a ue *d FT'-pertY rmht. Vaetsd pvpeiy Vt. ITBy CMJ afSe'o.'d aCCfJe I'.xratar.: LO the p(oJ.�cr:9 Of Saphxl 25-121 c' tura Wt—t Ritlga Cx1e cf Lana. Iw.k "awd - MITrL>tir-wrsw.. als ialy Houil c s, L Stat. of Ci WD 1 3—ty of Jeff<y 1 711 tore 1A� 0tsrenf xaa IIaYAN9�3d Uetwe ms Mrs _I I of D.NarM.t4L° O 2020. by _=tk1:..A*vm!?i 'Ally ul n torp and Affiai e L MY axnvws:.dn e..4uras' EWHERRANIM41I O hblary''x'•-- ,r BUTE OF COLRW NOTARY IO 200740/(MU I SLIRVEYOFfi CCE�-RT',,K_ATE U"A"W w�'•l+Ee : xeb? 1_tli v pert IT. _y Of ^5 tz'vrrlary cf JMS Laka HrDF4xJs, LLC aae nam !ri fn2 CL veer ffN 61BCT Wtq>H.'skr and tG the best Of n kraatat , mf tier: and baA:f. M ac—Clava with al a?plCable C t4mdJ 2tail , Cv f rs iaad e6i& as aPerd=-4 On aoczx ertyd3 pan as al* repreaents sa'd ' � • 9v rts0b �.�-� j� 14142 vs/ �•'�•�... �,,r' i ------------- LL C^..iW`Y CLERK AND RECORD&C CERTIRCA rE State or Cdxafu c—ly c Jefferson f h—by MIll'y ttat tris Fief: was UB7 In Pe oflce of ft Ca ty 06-k and P.cxfrder al Jetfwwo Owity at CxWeI; Cora d%at_...._ obhsl�_.V.. at It. o1AD, h JEFFERSON COUNT' CLERIC AND RECORDER BY _ ISN PLANNING CCMMHSSi�N CERTIFCATIGN EFiecrn7rsrdsd fa approrel fhls .� �� rYty of Dc.3n6nr' .467D by the WrDg;t Rdge Pafr'A'A) (�CI:l11Sa-bl� THINKTANK s t d i AIcIYUocurO IuhOa Mei(A aRlAtiY RBtrlok bene -trAst ctlo tat Pehlcicott9MA-997- dlonet (phbTle! 303.997.4925 flTwbue) 303-960-992s Y_ (y m W� W 00 _ i DTP —RE -SUBtsIT9 11-JJL 3e _— ODP RE -51&'[17 4 70 -MAI' -20 OOP ki-6JBMIT-1 0 -MAR -20 ODP :d-JUN•B W, Pp(e_ day IV w Of 1WVP Mw tY6 hsata[ HJU C!S'!%a.Tuil ISaVEC FOR: DOTE: 1 I 4TTEET City Cle(k R/mlvf ! aeuuoIn.,-,. n I— CaT ny i]e','gq- I PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET SHEET INDEX: ODP 1 CC+F_R SHEEt (DP 2'' LAND AND USE MAP ODP 1 JOE NUMBER I5-800 r�Iw. *,AD-lD)-7345.3 !i --------.... ,SEE NO ! E d 1-E - f JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT i AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO *�E. _�.... - P:A^NING AREA I S8, ACRES N0 E ---- - ---- - TRACTS 5, A t1 6 72. NICHOLAS GARDENS, 9 EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, N A DEED RECORDED D 3. PAD FEBRUARY 2l Me IN BOOK 1998 AT PAGE 3SS I A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTION 2q 1 -D SHA! L BE — TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE ft P.M. pet,.k berrer d -architect Rcelb COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO f . CONTAINING 22.73 ACRES MORE OR LESS ( W24838 SF �/• 1 i ` EE NOTE 4 Ti 1 C:-. �O �P:��I Rr �� diiiia•niiy � ' �r � ,;fir. PLANNING AREA 2 17.87 ACRES y PLANNED COMMEH-RCIA.I_ DEVELOPMENT ow 40% f r C NOTE 1 LAND SUMMARY P 'W' _�.... - P:A^NING AREA I S8, ACRES --` THINK TANK I PLANNING AREA Il.9T ACRES �a � D 3. PAD CO'1HERCIAL SERVICES AND RETAIL I )TE 2 -D SHA! L BE — �- pet,.k berrer d -architect Rcelb B.ARR, TAVERN5, ANC NIGHT CLUB& I W t BOaT RECREAT CNAL VEHICLE AND 'RAILER SALES RENALS, [ SER`ACE I p _DAY ARE CENTER, CHILD AND ADULT — 0 C 20' SKETCH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: . - OV -0' 1 1 LAND SUMMARY _�.... - P:A^NING AREA I S8, ACRES --` THINK TANK I PLANNING AREA Il.9T ACRES s [ u 4 i s � D 3. PAD CO'1HERCIAL SERVICES AND RETAIL _. rrcnu4core ;a�dxst.. n7eAas. )TE 2 -D SHA! L BE — �- pet,.k berrer d -architect Rcelb B.ARR, TAVERN5, ANC NIGHT CLUB& p67rickelhBdAe k"lonet W (phw ) 303-897-4948 (MD W) 303-960-9925 BOaT RECREAT CNAL VEHICLE AND 'RAILER SALES RENALS, [ SER`ACE I p _DAY ARE CENTER, CHILD AND ADULT — P P EA TYa 57 B SHMENT P P _ i_URBANGARDENS_ p j- VETERINARY CLINICS AND HOSPITAL$-NCUTDOO O R FENS II: H06PIT41. ITT AND ENTEWAINMENT 0 C 20' SKETCH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: . - OV -0' PAWS, OPEN SPACE AND PL AZA. P - F 1 LAND SUMMARY _�.... - P:A^NING AREA I S8, ACRES --` THINK TANK I PLANNING AREA Il.9T ACRES s [ u 4 i s U?IL!?.ES, MINOR P CO'1HERCIAL SERVICES AND RETAIL _. rrcnu4core ;a�dxst.. n7eAas. PERMITTED AND JSE6 ARE SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE. JSES NOT LIST DEEMED EXCLUDED. -D SHA! L BE — BANKS AND FiNANGIAL INSTIT4 -!CN9 - NO DRIVE THRi pet,.k berrer d -architect Rcelb B.ARR, TAVERN5, ANC NIGHT CLUB& p67rickelhBdAe k"lonet - - PERMITTED USES (phw ) 303-897-4948 (MD W) 303-960-9925 PAWS, OPEN SPACE AND PL AZA. P - F ALLOLED USES - --.------------------- RESIDENTIaL INCLLblNa: r- -------- ------ — ASslS?EO LIVVING FACI!:TY Pa•1 PA -2 p — T P DUELLING. MULTIPL-c .___.____._.__._ P DJELL!fY. LIVE /WORK IN NACL PUBLIC. GvlG AND !NS`ITUTIGL I.PJfNG: COWB'•uNITY BUf! DInYsS RJGLUDING LIBRAR!E6, MAI5EUM5 P ~ p '� PAWS, OPEN SPACE AND PL AZA. P - F PUBLIC USES AND BU!LC!NGS P I . _ ..___-_ -__ _ REGREA?!ON FACI!ITIES, INDGOR - -- P L LRSAN GARDENS I P P U?IL!?.ES, MINOR P CO'1HERCIAL SERVICES AND RETAIL I PHOT,.•,CpY!N'a-JND PRINT7� ANIMAL DAYCARE P- P BANKS AND FiNANGIAL INSTIT4 -!CN9 - NO DRIVE THRi P P B.ARR, TAVERN5, ANC NIGHT CLUB& -AnaN FACILITIES, COMMERCIAL BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOaT RECREAT CNAL VEHICLE AND 'RAILER SALES RENALS, [ SER`ACE I p _DAY ARE CENTER, CHILD AND ADULT — P P EA TYa 57 B SHMENT P P — FAST FOOD EATING ESTABL1941ENT - NO DRIVE THR) p p MICROBRELERYiMIGROD!5TtLLERY WITH TAP ROOM PJF RE-9UBMiT 5 -I MIGROBRELERY, MICRODi5TILLERYWITIIOU'T TAF ROOM P P - -.-- _ PERSONAL -RYG E5 P p I PHOT,.•,CpY!N'a-JND PRINT7� p P PRODUCE I, ROC'JCE STANDS _ P p -AnaN FACILITIES, COMMERCIAL REPAIR RENTAL AND SERVICING OF BOATS - OUTDOOR STORAGE P RETAIL SALES UP TO 20OW G5F FOR ONE TENANT SPACE P _ i_URBANGARDENS_ p j- VETERINARY CLINICS AND HOSPITAL$-NCUTDOO O R FENS p H06PIT41. ITT AND ENTEWAINMENT ART STUC!O5 AAID CALLER!E5 P HOTEL5, MOTELS p : .._._.__..................._-.__._.__-_......_-______.._-__�.-..._- ....___ STUDIOS, !^CLUD!rYs ART. MUSIC, DANCE, TELEV!SfON ANC RADIO P P (.THEATERS OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL - — MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES _ OFF IGFS P p I ANCILLARY USES PARING FACi!ITIES p p tEMPORARY USE" i_._.____. ! 9PEG..^ 6 EVENTS, I-NGLUD(NG FESTIVALS AND FARMERS MARKEF P LEG?MZ P PERMITTED USE SHEET NOTES U EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT PROpERT,. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT 'A' ADHERES TO ST4BL:SH-0 ACCESS ROUTES RF -ER TO 'DECLARAVON OF EASEMENT' AND RECORDED PLAT. NO B'JILDIN3 OR GRADING ! DRAINAGE PERMIT SHALL BE ISSUED FOR F LAMM AREA TWO UNTI•. THE CLAIMED DEFECT IN ACCESS ACROSS TRACT A IS RESOLVED TO THE SATISFAG*.ION OF i14 C!Y ATTORNEI 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES. SIDEWALKS. LAND6GAIII PARKING TO BE DETER•WNED AT SDP FA)BMIT-,AL_ 3) E!-IERG-ENGY SERVICE. Iw-RESS / EGRESS ONLY. 4) VEHICLE 41-CE55 5) PED TRAIL TO CGNANECT TO LINEAR PARK CBT CITY) WITH CR065 WALK ACRO6S i•l0 FRONT ROAD. b) DITCHES MAY BE RE -AL iGNED OR BURIED AS RESURED. ') SLOPE EASEMENT BOUNDARY. 6) THE COMMUNITY D'E'VELOPMENT DIRECTOR NAS THE AUTHORITY TO CETER"!'�NE THAT A USE NOT SFCCIF[CALLY LISTED SHOULD BE 60 PERMITTEC OR ALLda'ED CN THE DA5:5 OF !T BEING SIMILAR TO A LISTED US.. COMPATIBLE N_ HARAGTER ANri IMPACT WTH U5E5 IN THE ZONE DISTRICT, CO!NSiST_N' WITH THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH XU NGT BE OBJEOT:ONABLF TO NEARBY "R0PER7Y BY REASON CF ODOR. DUST, PT1E5, GTS NOISE. RADIATION NEAT. GLARE V:BRA-ION, iRAF!C GENERAT',ON. PARKING NE'cDS, OL"DO_R STORAGE OR USE. OR 15 NOT HA-<ARCCU6 TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF 5JRR.'IUDING AREAS THR�H DANGER -- FIRE OR EXPLOSION THE DIRECTOR'S DECIS:GN MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJJ6TMENT AS AN INTERPRETATION RECJEST. 159UED FOR• PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOS NUriBER 18-aoo ODP �•`+J6t'IT M H.AWtm PJF RE-9UBMiT 5 �-JUL-20 F R CD E-5'J'3'11T 'i 20`611'-20 ODP (g-515MIT Il 10 Ir✓1R-20 ODp 74 -JUN -19 159UED FOR• PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOS NUriBER 18-aoo Win[ O Vptl J Cpm MRS B® �- CE LI FMS OegarorCMe: TOCEAA Money Recervetl moeq Me: CO6823915 Recount Care: 11GFV20 ❑WtlM OusrnLulpns: 23.88 2388 PP VISA 8355IPDTH. 84958583 Money: 23.88 Change me: aaa IF From: ZONING M ISCELWJEOOS FEES ❑cgnenimhuaemobon .. ®oaRnnirtore ® FiisD z3.08 DIST CD. ZUMI ZONING MIsC,LuNEODS FEES RECORDING FEES o09 Reception #for JMS Lake Holdings LLC: 2020173453 CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE J15 LAKE HOLDINGS, LLO.MIOM- BE DEVELOrial IB TO REHABILITATE THIS FORMER GRAVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL ARD RESDENTIAL USES SIIRROIINDIN.a A PRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PAW WHICH WILL BE A VITAL AND UNIQUE AMENITY FOR THE IMSIOENTS AND PATRCUS OF THIS DEVEL(DPMENT ARD THE GREATER CaFMNRttY. THE HIGHLY VI5I5LE AC9VmEs OCCORING ON THE LAKE WILL 5ERVE TO ENHANCE THE 'FEGMARY GATEWAY' ASPECT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT THE PROJECT PROPOSES TRANSIT BURFORD VE USES AND DEN5171EB GIVEN THE PRONtil TO THE WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION. A RESIDENTIAL COM IANITY IS PROPOSED FOR THE CAPER PLANNIN'.a AREA (PAI) WITH RETAIL AMEN1nE6 THE ARCHITTOWURE WILL FRONT AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL PEDE57RIAN COR. POOR5 AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE 51TE TOPOGRAPHY 70 PROVIDE VIEWS 70 THE LAKEFTFOI THE LOWER PENINSULA SITE N PLANNING AREA (PA]) IS PROFUSED TO CONTAIN NAIL. THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IB TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE WATER -FRO T LOCATION AND SITE VSIBI Im FROM 1 1 To SHOWDASE WATER SPORTS. FDA ACTIVITr NODE WOULD ALSO SERVE TO CREAM A GATEWAY INTO THE Cltt. THE KEY PROXIMTY AND VISIBILITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE I -TO, WARD ROAD, AND Up i RIDGE -WARD BTATION CORRIDORS WILL O FER A LoUGUE LEVEL OF VITALITY AND CO`IMNRITY BTNBBSY THAT WILL BE FURTHER ENHANCED Br THE OVERALL COMPLEMENTARY ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND CO" IMAUTY PH FELOPERNT OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WLI9-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES TWA OUTLINE DEVELOR9ENT PLAN Is CONCEPTUAL IN NAnff. SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENTS SUCH AS 51TE LAYOUT AND BUILDING, ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RE5ULi, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED ADD AFPRO ED BY THE CIT] OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR 70 THE GLEM1774- OF A RIGHT -CF -WAY OR BUILDING PERT] APPLICATION AND ANT W56HQUHNT SITE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING AND LOADING BHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 36-1109 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, WITH THE FOLLOWIN3 MODIFICATIONS I ADDITIONS= PAWING FORMUL1I-0SE BWLOINCGS SHOULD HE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF ERWLDIbKiS, AND AND STRUCTURED PAWING 16 ENCOURAGED. WHERE PRACTICAL. P EOE -STANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PAWING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PR'OPO5ED BE. 511 PARKING ADD VEHICULAR LOADING FOR PASSENGERS AND, 45 APFEr.PRIATE, MERCHANDISE, SHALL GE TROIIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMTY 70 THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRUCTURES. SERVICE LOADING, AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPING AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTIF S SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH BECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAM, ALL F.IRCIN.a SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 36-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE LADE OF LAWS. ALL VICINAGE SHALL BE IN CONFCAIANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, BILLBOARDS ARE FROHIBITED. ARCHITECTURAL, BITE, AND BLffETBCAPE DE51GN SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL (AODM AND STREETSCAPE DESIGN MANUAL. OUTDOOR STORAGE: BOATS AND NVENTOR D ARE TO BE DIAPLAI£D IN OUTDOOR AREAS N PA -2 COMPLYING, WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE 5ECTION Ga-b3B, STANDARDS FOR ACCEBBORY STRUCTURES. ACCESSORY BTRJCTPRES SHALL BE ALLOWED, PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STROCNffS SHALL NOT EXCEED RUHMT PERMIIJT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE PRIMARY SrH1cTWff OR STRIIcnffS CN THE SUBJECT LOT A D ES`ORY BUILDINGS SHALL BE COIMFRISED OF HCHOD, MATERIALS, AND CALORS THAT AM COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITIES OF THE PRIMARY BUILDING. DRI VE THRJ'S ARE PROHIBITED PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIhNM BPILDING COVERYE1 WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION 1T9. BUILD ro -TO PRONrAGE ROAD 0-30FROM PROPERTY LINE 30n BUILD TO WARD ROAD 0-20' HROM PlArde r LINE 30% MAXIMIUM BUILDING HEIGHT 120' MIN GO MAX (6 STORIES) 393-618-6663 PLANNING AREA 2 WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION 55 LAKE HOLDINGS. LLC THINK TANK 5=10, INC. MINIMN'I SETBACK FR NT PROPERTY PO BOX TBI IO' FROM E457 ROMERTY LINE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT W 49TH STREET 1 35' MAX. (3 STORIES) JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS 9.14 n a Of NIGIOLl3 GARDEN& EXCEPT III PORTON CONVEI'EO TO TRE LETT. OF HICHNI/i. STATE OF WLCRADQ IN A SEED RECORDED FEBROMY M SW IN BOOK 1999 AT PAGE 368. A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION A. TONNSHIP 3 SOURI RANGE 89 WEST OF THE Sir P.M. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO GONTNNING 2273 ACRES MORE OR LESS (990248,35 SF I- ) OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING A) THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A PU5LICLY-4CCE$6I5LE 1AUI-0SE TRAIL CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S LINEAR PARK NORTH OF THE 1-10 FRONTAGE ROAD. THE FINAL LOCATION DESIGN, AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS SHALL BE DEMIRONED AT TIME OF 5DP AND PLAT REVIEW 7HRCWH APi20VA1. OF CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND A BPBDIVIBION IMPROVEMENT AGREEFTENT. B) THE SITE SHALL INCWDE A POND THAT 16 NO LESS THAN PI VE ACRES M SIE, WHICH MAY ALSO SERVE AS A AS A STOTd9WATER MANAGEMENT FADOL In EOR! THE DEVELOPMENT. IN THE EVENT CE A NATURAL REDACTION IN POND SIZE (IE, LONG-TERM DROJGHD THE AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS OPEN SPACE. IP A RDACTON IN THE POND SIZE (NATURAL OR MAN MADE) RESULTS IN A REQUEST FOR INCREASED DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA FROM WHAT 15 DEPICTED CN SHEET 2, AN AMENDED ODP SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT 5TANDAR S, ACCESS. AND LAND USE CONCEPTS FCR THE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPABLE AREA C) LANDSCAPE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN Pi AND Pi SHALL BE AT LEAST Be. AND SHALL OTHERJIISE HE IN COrFORall WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS D) GRFORRIST SHALL IDENTIFY roak INVASIVE AND NON -NUISANCE SPECIES OF TffES TO BE R £SERVED AND SUCH ANALYSIS SHALL ACCOMPANY THE SDP WITH THE INTENT TO PRESERVE A HEALTHY AND MATURE TREE CANOPY TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE 5.2301 TO 74E REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF 5747 AND PLANNING CPO ISSION. PROJECT TEAM OOP WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION 55 LAKE HOLDINGS. LLC THINK TANK 5=10, INC. VICINITY PO BOX TBI MAP:,PH"��201 FREDERICI(. CO W530 W 49TH STREET CONTACT: PATRICK BERREND 393-618-6663 ARCHITECT, NCARB F DID! SURVEYOR: RUBINO SURVErNG DID! 3313 AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTANTS BOULDER COLORADO W301 HBO aat AVENUE CONTACT ROBERT J. RJBINO PL5 LONGffONT, CO 89501 (393)464-eEoB 0) RD 303-651-6626 LH W.1 DO z w a w 10e V -A - Z l➢1 0 IM w O iL 0 4 Z Z Q <1-A WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA Q Q F w Q w Q 3 1-70 BID OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING A) THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A PU5LICLY-4CCE$6I5LE 1AUI-0SE TRAIL CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S LINEAR PARK NORTH OF THE 1-10 FRONTAGE ROAD. THE FINAL LOCATION DESIGN, AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS SHALL BE DEMIRONED AT TIME OF 5DP AND PLAT REVIEW 7HRCWH APi20VA1. OF CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND A BPBDIVIBION IMPROVEMENT AGREEFTENT. B) THE SITE SHALL INCWDE A POND THAT 16 NO LESS THAN PI VE ACRES M SIE, WHICH MAY ALSO SERVE AS A AS A STOTd9WATER MANAGEMENT FADOL In EOR! THE DEVELOPMENT. IN THE EVENT CE A NATURAL REDACTION IN POND SIZE (IE, LONG-TERM DROJGHD THE AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS OPEN SPACE. IP A RDACTON IN THE POND SIZE (NATURAL OR MAN MADE) RESULTS IN A REQUEST FOR INCREASED DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA FROM WHAT 15 DEPICTED CN SHEET 2, AN AMENDED ODP SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT 5TANDAR S, ACCESS. AND LAND USE CONCEPTS FCR THE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPABLE AREA C) LANDSCAPE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN Pi AND Pi SHALL BE AT LEAST Be. AND SHALL OTHERJIISE HE IN COrFORall WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS D) GRFORRIST SHALL IDENTIFY roak INVASIVE AND NON -NUISANCE SPECIES OF TffES TO BE R £SERVED AND SUCH ANALYSIS SHALL ACCOMPANY THE SDP WITH THE INTENT TO PRESERVE A HEALTHY AND MATURE TREE CANOPY TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE 5.2301 TO 74E REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF 5747 AND PLANNING CPO ISSION. PROJECT TEAM OOP COATER: 0 60' LAKE HOLDINGS. LLC THINK TANK 5=10, INC. VICINITY PO BOX TBI MAP:,PH"��201 FREDERICI(. CO W530 CONTACT: MARK JOLSTAD CONTACT: PATRICK BERREND 393-618-6663 ARCHITECT, NCARB 393-969-9945 OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING A) THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A PU5LICLY-4CCE$6I5LE 1AUI-0SE TRAIL CONNECTING TO THE CITY'S LINEAR PARK NORTH OF THE 1-10 FRONTAGE ROAD. THE FINAL LOCATION DESIGN, AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS SHALL BE DEMIRONED AT TIME OF 5DP AND PLAT REVIEW 7HRCWH APi20VA1. OF CIVIL CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS AND A BPBDIVIBION IMPROVEMENT AGREEFTENT. B) THE SITE SHALL INCWDE A POND THAT 16 NO LESS THAN PI VE ACRES M SIE, WHICH MAY ALSO SERVE AS A AS A STOTd9WATER MANAGEMENT FADOL In EOR! THE DEVELOPMENT. IN THE EVENT CE A NATURAL REDACTION IN POND SIZE (IE, LONG-TERM DROJGHD THE AREA SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS OPEN SPACE. IP A RDACTON IN THE POND SIZE (NATURAL OR MAN MADE) RESULTS IN A REQUEST FOR INCREASED DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA FROM WHAT 15 DEPICTED CN SHEET 2, AN AMENDED ODP SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH DEVELOPMENT 5TANDAR S, ACCESS. AND LAND USE CONCEPTS FCR THE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPABLE AREA C) LANDSCAPE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN Pi AND Pi SHALL BE AT LEAST Be. AND SHALL OTHERJIISE HE IN COrFORall WITH SECTION 26-502 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS D) GRFORRIST SHALL IDENTIFY roak INVASIVE AND NON -NUISANCE SPECIES OF TffES TO BE R £SERVED AND SUCH ANALYSIS SHALL ACCOMPANY THE SDP WITH THE INTENT TO PRESERVE A HEALTHY AND MATURE TREE CANOPY TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE 5.2301 TO 74E REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF 5747 AND PLANNING CPO ISSION. PROJECT TEAM OOP COATER: ARCHTECT: LAKE HOLDINGS. LLC THINK TANK 5=10, INC. IMS 919 SOUTH LAKE ROAD PO BOX TBI LAKEIW.JOT)CO BM21 FREDERICI(. CO W530 CONTACT: MARK JOLSTAD CONTACT: PATRICK BERREND 393-618-6663 ARCHITECT, NCARB 393-969-9945 SURVEYOR: RUBINO SURVErNG CIVIL ENGINEER: 3313 AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTANTS BOULDER COLORADO W301 HBO aat AVENUE CONTACT ROBERT J. RJBINO PL5 LONGffONT, CO 89501 (393)464-eEoB CONTACT: JOEL BEAMCD, P£. RD 303-651-6626 The bebw slalal cowrsAsl, or egaly deskJlatei Agents), Thais W lerede egee not We Prepore agaly desei lean will be deeelo ed as a Ramand Espveapran[ IT ccandi wHM1 thin Li asUcl'ms aM Andorra Conanno In in6 plan, add as trey othi bre RgLIFN by law (vre) further reo-xsha that tine appo✓al H a resp4T to Panne) Dp opopllent and apiparty of tNs yspaid Csakprenf plan doormay not C�fa a NReef Glome Oft Veda.] proom of eafen may only The aro t Roe CAnkeof to the MmkMs ah 9eCtlon 26-121 of tle NAtiat R$E Cctle of Laws. fell Aland -MenierHManager JMS lens Hd0ng; CLO) Nate of ColoraN I 1 ss coutly of JeRRsn 1 The letookend Ipartia nt yaks acknnMa{ed before me thin �y of � A . p ty yetri my Lana and offireal RI. My arrmssen Aman s'. Notary Triple SURVERFORS CERRRGATE not nomads, chi that the all of ife Berl N JMS fake HdOings, LLC was mems by me or ul my dal sageNSM and to Ad best of hey MawleJje, Mwmafon aM betel, In acmndarce %an all applenb6 Colomamb stated, CurtaN enii enol as amaN,d, top aammgsnyimg pan accurni normal said survey (SrteeyIX%fiban Signature )sk; County of Jeffersen 1 I nrreby wM1ry Whet ma plan MGs am in Re o0de of the Caunry Ci and liecwde of Femoral County at loltlei, Voi at tldodr_.M on Whe ay of AD IT Bak_ Fagg_ Toenail Na JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By Dep ry PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION IRemmamd for apparel this Way N bV We, Wheat Edge Pdnnln9 Ccmmasa,. Clary ¢n CIN CERRRCATION )WPraeed fn'Is ay R GR An Aneat Rodat (My Coral ATE6T Clry Clerk Mayor Lana ty Development okenter SHEET INDEX: OOP 1 COVER SHEET ODP 21 LAND USE MAP 00 THINKTANK soIt :, d : o patrick demand - arpM1item, r1oaN palrlckethinkgnkeludlwel (plwne) 503-99]-0948 (Imbllel 303-980-0925 PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ODP 1 JOB NUMBER w z 0 -A L -A w m RD <1 LH z w w 10e V -A - ® l➢1 w w iL 4 Z Ci <1-A Q F w w PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ODP 1 JOB NUMBER JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT SEE AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO e NOTE TPA STA STATE n 6 EO MGNOWB DEED RE DICEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HICNFEBR ATY 21 OF CIXAOOK IN A DEED RCu^4`HGEO FEBRUARY 21, THE O BOOK1399 V4 AT PAGEON TOWNSHIP OF THE RANGE ES OF aTHE M A, TOWNSHIP3 FJEFF RSCIR fig WEST COLORADO THE PM GWNMOFCRES ORESTATE S IDQSW -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT CQMAINING 2ZTl ACRES MUNE DP U=55(B'489B fiF/ - ) SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 4 1-70 BEE,OTE 1) ffACT "A" LLI < BUILDING PAD w BUILDING PAD =SEE NOTE 7 � O 0 ?PLANNING OPEN SPACE Q o SEE NOTE O N o AREA 1 SEE NOTE Q �3: cn 4.86 ACRES gpg IAgO ��oN`� w O JU OPg 6 w ggKE ,oM' 11 111 CON gg N U gUA OANO `•" OPEN SP PGg gE 00 �PgOVEI Rg OgGK FY .w•• ...o•` 111 COPEUOPU P L1 0 mm�mnnnow ggAvg G C�g0��.�n 111111`` gU\ 0\NO PARS\N ggp G P..........1 11111 ,11111 w P gJ PARKING 11 11 1111 P Y �� EEE.EEE.EEE.EEEEEpE�EE.EEE �� C` C, C� AQP BUILDING PAD m Q g�P� OPCS PLANNING < SEE NOTE 2 w AREA 2 cn 17.87 ACRES PARKING WARD POND SEE NOTE 3 1 } SIT'SOUND "NIARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LAND SUMMARY PLANNING AREA I D PLANNING AMA 2 SKETCH PLAN 33. 13 ACRES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P DWELLING, MULTIPLE P GRAPHIC SCALE: I' = 60'-O' LAND SUMMARY PLANNING AREA I 426 ACRES PLANNING AMA 2 11 Sl ACRES TOTAL SITE 33. 13 ACRES DEEMED EXCWDEO S ARE SHOJM N THE TOLLOWING TABLE. I15E5 NOT LISTED SHALL BE PERMITTED USES ALLOWED UtE5 PA -I PA-: RESIDENTIAL INCTUDII a: P ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P DWELLING, MULTIPLE P DWELLING. LIVE / WORK P PUBLIC, CIVIC AND NST ITIONAL INCLUDING: CP UNITY BUILDINGS INCLUDING LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND PLAZAS P P PUBLIC USES AND BUILDI1,65 P EOffAT10N FACILITES. INDOOR P P URBMI GARDENS P P UTILITIES, MINOR P C011ERCIAL SERVICES ATD RETAIL ANIMAL DAYCARE P P RANKS AVT) FNANCCAL NSTINTONS - NO DRIVE TWOU P P BARS, TAVERE, AND NIGHT CLUBS P F BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOAT RECREATIOd4L VEHICLE AND TRAILER SALES, RENTALS, 1 SERVICE P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P EATIN'S ESTABLISHMENT P F FAST FWD EATING ESTABLISHMENT - ND DROVE THpI P F MICROBREW£RY, MICRODI6TILLER1 WITH TAP RCg9 P P MCCRDBRELLERY, MICRODISTILLERY WITHOUT TAP ROOM P P PERSONAL SERVICES P P PHOTOCOPYING AID PRINTING P P FRWUOE 5TAND5 F P RECREATION FACILITES, COMMERCIAL P P REPAIR RENTAL AND SERVICING OF BOATS - OUTDOOR 5TOR43E P ,NAIL SALES UP TO 30000 GSE FOR ONE TENANT SPACE P P URBAI GARDENS P F VETERINARY CLINICS AND HO5PI741-5 - NO OUMOOR PEN5 P P HOSPITALITY AND ENTERTAINMENT ART $TUC 105 AND GALLERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS P SNDCo5, INCLUDING ARC MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND PAID 10 P F THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P F ANCILLARY USES PARKING FACILRCE5 P P TEMPORARY USES sPECI4 EVENTS, NCLUDING FESTIVALS AND FARYERS MARKET P P LEGEND: P FER'IITTED USE SHEET NOTES: N EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERLY TRAVER5E5 ADJACENT PROPERTY THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT 'AADHER£5 TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO'DECLARATICN OF EASEMENT" AND RECORDED PLAT, NO BUILDIFA'a OR GRINDING / DR ,NAGE PER 117 SHALL BE ISSUED FOR PLMWINEF AREA TWO UNTIL THE CLAIMED DEFECT N YLE55 ACROSS TRACT A Is fffDLVED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY ATTCEIEY. ]) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SOCIE4 K5. LANDSCAPING, PARKA TO BE DETER9NED AT SDP 5UBM77AL. 3) EMERGENCY 5ERVIOE. INGRE55 / EGRE56 ONLY, 4) ADTI OLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONNECT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH CROSS WALK ACROSS 1-10 FROM ROAD. 6) DITCHES MAY BE RE ALIGNED OR BURIED AS REM1ffD. l) SLOPE EASEMENT BOUNDARY, 5) THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPI'IENT DIRECTOR HA5 THE AUTHORITY TO DETEWINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE SO PER!WTTED OR 4 -LOPED ON THE BASS OF IT SONS SIMILAR TO A LISIED USE, CP`1PATIBLE IN CHAR TER AND IMPACT WITH USES IN THE ACNE DISTRICT, CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH UOULD NOT BE OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BY REA50N OF WOR, DUST, PUPBS, GAS NOISE RADIATION, HEAT, GLARE, VIBRATION, TRAFFIC GENERATION PAk:ML NEEDS OUTDOOR STORACaE OR USE OR B NOT HAZARDOUS TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF SURROUNDING AREAS THROUGH DANGER OF FIRE OR EXPLOSION. THE DIF£CTOR'S DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJW5TMENT AS AN INTERPRETATION REQUEST. :: THINKTANK e amM=wre 'ros v wFem CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER DOZEMAN COUNCIL BILL NO. 19 ORDINANCE NO. 1699 Series of 2020 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF W. 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH FROM AGRICULTURAL -TWO (A-2) TO PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (PMUD) WITH AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (ODP) (CASE NO. WZ-19-03 / WARD ROAD POND ODP) WHEREAS, Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws establishes procedures for the City's review and approval of requests for land use cases; and, WHEREAS, JMS Lake Holdings LLC submitted a land use application for approval of a zone change to the Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) District for property at the southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a Comprehensive Plan, Northwest Subarea Plan, and TOD vision documents which call for transit supportive uses including residential development to support the viability of nearby businesses and employers, and recreational and commercial employment uses; and, WHEREAS, the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding area, balances the site's proximity to transit, access to water, visibility from the interstate, and adjacency to a state highway, and complies with the comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the zone change criteria support the request; and, WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 1, 2020 and voted to recommend approval of the rezoning of the property to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD), NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Upon application by JMS Lake Holdings LLC for approval of a zone change ordinance from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) for property located at the southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road, and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change is approved for the following described land: TRACTS 9, 10, 11, & 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1968 IN BOOK 1999 AT PAGE 368. A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST Y40F SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6 T" P.M., COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, CONTAINING 22.73 ACRES MORE OR LESS (990,248.38 SF Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severabilitv; Conflicting Ordinance Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of the ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 8 to 0 on this 12t'' day of October 2020, ordered it published with Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for Monday, November 9, 2020 at 7:00 o'clock p.m., as a virtual meeting, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of 8 to 0 this 9t" day of November 2020. SIGNED by the Mayor on this 9t" day of November, 2020. Bud Starker, Mayor ATT �,ST: S 9)Kirkpatrick, City Clerk /4F vr,zcgT Approved as to Form toRA�O Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney First Publication: October 15, 2020 Second Publication: November 12, 2020 Jeffco Transcript Effective Date: November 27, 2020 Published: Jeffco Transcript and www.ci.wheatridge.co.us City Council Meeting Minutes CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING November 9. 2020 Note: This meeting was held virtually, using Zoom video -teleconferencing technology. As duly announced and publicly noticed, Council previously approved this format in order to continue with normal business and respond to the CoVid-19 Pandemic and the related public emergency orders promulgated by the President of the United States, the Governor of Colorado, and the Wheat Ridge City Council. Before calling the meeting to order, Mayor Starker stated the rules and procedures necessitated by this meeting format. Mayor Starker called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Janeece Hoppe Judy Hutchinson Zachary Urban Rachel Hultin Amanda Weaver Korey Stites Leah Dozeman Valerie Nosier Beck Also present: City Clerk, Steve Kirkpatrick; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; City Manager, Patrick Goff; City Treasurer, Chris Miller; Administrative Services Director, Allison Scheck; Community Development Director Ken Johnstone; Patrick Berrend, architect for the proposed PMUD (item 2) and several Wheat Ridge 101 graduates: Lisa Rucker, Al Gallo, Betty Jo , Nancy Dragani, Pat ----, Melody Mascarenes other staff, guests and interested citizens. 01 D CEREMONIES Mayor Starker three proclamations. Wheat Ridge 101 Gra Recognition The City recognized the citizens have comp City's operations, structures and strate fo Small Business Saturday WChe course, which addresses the ng the people of our City. Each year since 2010 the na ' as recognized the ne-4tkQpatronize local, small businesses. Billions ar ent each year on the designated, hich is the Saturday following Thanks i g (and the day following "Black Friday"). The PhyQr read a proclamatio Glaring Small Business Saturday in Wheat Ridge on Nove ?r 28, 2020. City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 page 2 \W10m Recognition r recognized Bill Peterson, a veteran of World War II. He was a gunner n ess with the US Army Air Corps unit known as the Flying Tigers. Th proclamation recognizing Mr. Peterson as an example of the brav en ho have fearlessly and faithfully served our country, defending o r way of or declared November 11 as Veteran's Day in Wheat Ridge. AP Without objectionXe Study Session Notes of October 19, 2020, City ouncil Minutes of October 26, 2020 aSpecial Study Session Notes of October 26, 20 were approved as published. APPROVAL OF AGEND Without objection or correctidgi, the agenda stood as anngxfnced. CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK This item began at 7:13 PM. Guy Nahmiach, 3650 Ward Road — caNd to th k everyone for their support for the Gazette as it restarts publication. In 10ys he next issue will circulate. If you have a letter to the editor please, send it along. Note about Wheat Rid0e Speaks: Citizens may visit the Wheat idge Speak website and enter written comments of up to 1,000 words on a5f Council agenda em. The deadline for citizens to submit comments is 12:90 Noon Mountain Tim on the day of a Council session so that Council memb s, other elected officials %d City Staff have time to review th/commen before the meeting on Mond evening. The City e transcribes those Wheat Ridge peaks comments into these mig each comment along with the rec d for that agenda item, includingclude a public hearing (verbatim, so g as the comments do not cous language or unlawful hate speech). No comme appeared in Wheat Ridge Speaks for this Council sessi. 1. C SENT AGENDA Discu ion began at approximately 7:20 PM ncilmember Stites introduced the consent agenda a. Motion to approve monthly payments to Kaiser Permanente for January thro December 2021 membership billing not to exceed a total amount of $2,600,( City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 �9 Motion to award a contract to Seven Point Construction, of Cent al Colorado, i e amount of $329,255 for safety and other improvemen City Hall and apprdlft.a 5% contingency in the amount of $16,463 fo oreseen project expenses c. Motion to adopt the 2D24,City Council Mpel'i"ng Calendar d. Motion to cancel the Novembe 2020 and December 28, 2020 Regular business meetings of the eat Rid ity Council due to the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays. e. Resolutio 56-2020 - a resolution approving an a dment to the inter rnmental agreement with Jefferson County for C S Act local ernment distributions M ,lion by Councilmember Stites to approve Consent Agenda Items a.), b.), c-', and .'�e.) Seconded by Councilmember Urban; motion carried 8-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING Discussion began at approximately 7:29 PM 2. Council Bill No.19-2020 — An Ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at the southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) Councilmember Dozeman introduced Council Bill No. 19-2020 The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan for property located at the southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road. The zone change will allow for a variety of commercial, residential, and recreational uses on the property. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. The City Clerk Steve Kirkpatrick assigned Ordinance No. 1699 Staff Presentation by Lauren Mikulak, Director of Planning and Scott Cutler, Planner II with the City of Wheat Ridge: The Planning staff gave a detailed presentation and incorporated into the public record the files related to this case, including but not limited to the proceedings of the Planning Commission, public comments and their presentation to Council. Public Comment Guy Nahmiach, 3650 Ward Road. Called to ask if anyone knows how many different species of birds and fishes live in the subject area. He wondered if any of the studies done for this development included an impact study on the fauna. City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 page 4 Elizabeth Smith, 4255 Parfet St. Called to support Guy's concerns about the impact of the project on the birds, animals and fishes living in that habitat. She is concerned that we are losing our attractive wild spaces as the City grows. Council Questions and comments Councilmember Hoppe noted that staff who testified were appropriately sworn to tell the truth. Councilmembers asked a number of questions about the habitat for animals, especially birds and fishes. They asked about any state or county agencies that have regulations concerning the environmental impacts. Staff responded that no agency has expressed concerns because, among other provisions, the project must preserve the pond. Councilmembers asked whether any agencies need to approve the plan, beside the agencies who have already reviewed and commented. Mr. Berrend testified as to details on the future of the pond and the wildlife living on and near the site. Mr. Cutler also answered Council's questions with details and specifics. For instance, trees other than nuisance species, will be preserved. Council asked about which specific species are considered nuisances, and Mr. Berrend provided a detailed answer; most are invasive species. Mr. Cutler explained that the trail described in the Plan will be open to the public, however the pond will not be open to the public for boating or fishing. Councilmember Hoppe asked for the specific language that Mr. Dahl recommends adding to the motion to approve, with respect to an easement yet to be settled. Mr. Cutler stated the condition: No building permit or grading and drainage permit may be issued until the defect in access in Tract A is resolved to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. Mayor Starker asked several detailed questions about water rights, the plans for commercial and residential buildings on the East side of the plot, and similar specifics. Mr. Berrend responded with details. Councilmember Hultin asked at what point in the process Council will have information on what will happen to the trees currently located on the site. Mr. Cutler responded that landscaping and grading plans must, and will, address that and other questions, and Council will approve the final plan. Councilmember Hultin asked about requirements to preserve as many non-invasive species as possible. Mr. Cutler replied that the current plan does require attention to preserving trees and the tree canopy. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by Councilmember Dozeman to approve Council Bill No.19-2020 — an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at the southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 page 5 Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP), on second reading and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication, for the following reasons: 1. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the rezoning after conducting a proper public hearing. 2. The proposed rezoning has been reviewed by the Community Development Department, which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The proposed rezoning has been found to comply with the criteria for review in Section 26-303 of the Code of Laws. Subject to the following condition (added during the Council meeting): No building permit or grading and drainage permit may be granted until resolution of the claimed defect in access across Tract A is resolved to the satisfaction of the City Attorney. Seconded by Councilmember Urban, motion carried 8-0. 3. Council Bill 20-2020 - An ordinance repealing ordinance 1691, Series 2020, an \ ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 9800 W. 38th Aveny uncilmember Weaver introduced Council Bill No. 20-2020 A re ndum petition has been found to be sufficient with respect to Or nce 1691, Series 2 , which rezoned property at 9800 W. 38th Avenue. Under ction 6.2(b) of the Charter, a Council is required to either repeal the ordinance efer the same to the voters. This dinance repeals Ordinance 1691. Mayor Starker opene a public hearing. The Mayor reviewed the pr edures. No citizens ap ared in chambers to address this issue. There were none who ted to speak th gh the Zoom format or by telephone. City Clerk Steve Kirkpatrick assigned 010ance No. 1700. City Attorney Gerald Dahl reviewed a coun ' bill with members where Ordinance 1691 rezoned certain real prope at 9800 WesNth Avenue from R-1 to PRD, with an ODP permitting four single f ily homes and threes. The Ordinance was adopted on July 13, 2020yol A referendum petiti was timely filed on August 27, 2020. T City Clerk certified the petition as suffic' t, following amendment as permitted by the Ne Under the Charter, a su ient referendum petition requires the Council to epeal the subject ordinance r refer it to the voters of the city "at the next regular municip lection, or at a spe ' election called therefor." $Gncil has chosen to repeal the ordinance, and this Ordinance doing so was n first reading on October 26, 2020. City Council Minutes November 9, 2020 page 9 also asked for a future Study Session to address a wildlife and habitat %gement plan. Consensus achieved. Council:nX ber Urban asked that either Treasurer Miller or staff provide ouncil a breakdown who pays property and use taxes, in terms of factors irenue ding profit vs. not-for-profit, o anizational/business size (by metrics like annual r and numbers of employees) an a contribution of each of these categories the City's revenue stream from those to S. Mr. Goff indicated that staff would alyze the data available and provide as much in ation for Council as it will yiel . Councilmember Hutchinson nked our Veterans fo eir service and emphasized the need to recognize their service sacrifice. Councilmember Urban echoed those pres ' ns of gratitude to our Veterans. Several Councilmembers thanked Mayo%tose Hoppe for her service. Mayor Pro Tem Hoppe thanked her peers forth he past and for the honor of electing her again, and looks forward to co inuiin a role she enjoys. Mayor Starker congratulated uncilmember Hoppe d thanked her for doing what in his opinion is an excellent ' in the role of Mayor Pro Councilmember Hop asked for a consensus to bring forwa\aferendum. tudy Session the question of financ egulations for petition circulators seekin Consensus ac . ved. She also a hasized that saluting and honoring all veterans on VeteraDay every year is ry important. fllayor thanks all who attended and participated. Next Saturday at 9 AM the Mayor will be held on Zoom. ADJOURNMENT The me djourned at 8:55 pm. Steve ' patrick, City Clerk APP V CITY COUNCIL ON Janeece Hoppe, Ik4ayor Pro Tem December 14 . 2020 The preceding Minutes were prepared according to §47 of Robert's Rules of Order, i.e. they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD's of the meetings are available for listening or viewing by contacting the City Clerk's Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions. WZ-19-03 Ward Road Pond (southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road N and Ward Road) Request for approval of a zone change to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) City Council November 9, 2020 1 24 �R" iL88RR ";. Jo t1 F. j 1 . M --z ■■ ppppr - �i .. ... } . Li l -- r d w _ W 4 40'TH AVE - w L]�—E a rd c . '14M-.Wl o �ct IA a rd Planned Development Process Step 1- Outline Development Plan: — Accompanies the zone change request — Establishes development standards, uses, density — Establishes general site layout and access Step 2 - Specific Development Plan: — Provides a more detailed review of the proposed We are here development: e.g. architecture, landscaping, site design — Must be compliant with approved ODP Step 3 - Subdivision: — To remove internal lot lines, sell/develop lots separately, and establish additional easements — Will typically accommodate SDP 0 BUILDING PAD SEE NCTE 2 SEE NOTE 4 I HAOT "A" SEE NOTE 4 e _ O _ U Y Q _ a_ \ 0 m< w� c~—n ORT _ w PARKING SEE NOTE7 BUILDING PAD L< P R NAING SEE NOTE 2 OPEN SPACE Mme/.88 ACRE a EE' DEO U I aBOVEI -� SPE 7' C 5QP PLANNING AREA 2 U Y Q BUILDING PAD SEE NOTE 2 a_ \ 0 m< w� c~—n 17.87 ACRES PARKING W@rc7 Gdoad pcnc7 AI PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DE`J-- 0 a r �mnuuu SEE NOTE 4 aaa�a,P•,p,a••+• .•paa•♦aaa• � �. PLANNING AREA 1 EM OPEN SPACE 4.86 ACRES- owsoos' 00 VY, 00 �N "so 00 00 V WO Goals',W ow 00 01 00y_f' -.ddsbL T, EE NC OPEN SPACE ` EE 1\,()TE 7- - s � .nnow"�'•i ,'„' OQ � -PAG PLANNING AREA 2 17.87 ACRES SEE NOTE 4 P ,Fll' '; ) oQ Y I vv E i TILE I F -E m a EE TE w _ I FAFKING Development Standards PROPOSED ZONING: PMUD (with ODP) Uses Selected MU -C TOD uses, plus additional recreational and sales uses Architecture Comply with Architectural and Site Design Manual Building PA -1: 90' or 6 stories Height PA -2: 35' or 3 stories Parking Comply with Mixed Use code section, based on use or unit count Setbacks PA -1: 0'-20' build to from Ward Rd (30%) and Frontage Rd (20%) PA -2: 10' from eastern property line Landscape 15% of each planning area (not including water) Pedestrian trail connecting to City's future trail/bridge to TOD 0 WS G I I' Kaiser Vampus --I r c Nil .- ' I II � � 11 I � I, N vv 7f E S Process Neighborhood Meeting — Held on June 11, 2019 — 1 attendee from the surrounding area Referral — No concerns from outside agencies or City departments Planning Commission recommended approval 15 -day Public Hearin noticing for City Council 0 — Wheat Ridge Speaks �o Findings ODP Findings: — Allows for a compatible land use — Complies with comprehensive plan and City's vision for transit -supportive uses in the Northwest Subarea — Provides opportunity for reinvestment —The infrastructure in the area can support the development —The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request Staff Recommendation ODP: Staff recommends approval 14'= o® 14--t o® Wh6atP,ii.dge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WZ-19-03 /Ward Pond ODP CITY COUNCIL HEARING DATE: November 9, 2020 I, Greg Lockridge (n a m e) residing at 8226 Urban court Arvada, CO 80005 (address) as the applicant for Case No. WZ-19-03 hereby certify that I have posted the sign for Public Notice at Southeast corner of I-70 Frontage Rd. N and Ward Road (location) on this 21 day of October and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on the map below. Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Community Development Department for this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file. MAP ♦�A City of W heat Kildgc PUBLIC POSTING REQUIREMENTS One sign must be posted per 400 feet (2 signs on Ward Road and 3 signs on 1-70 Frontage Rd N). In addition, the following requirements must be met: ■ The sign must be located within the property boundaries. ■ The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. ■ The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. ■ The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. ■ The sign must be legible and posted for fifteen (15) continuous days prior to and including the day of the hearing; sign must be in place until 5pm on November 9, 2020. It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form to the Community Development Department. Wheat Ridge Speaks Published Comments for October 1, 2020 Planning Commission Meeting Zone Change at SE Corner of W 1-70 Frontage Rd N and Ward Rd We own the building at 4865 Ward. We would welcome well designed multi -story buildings, either office buildings or residential. This unique site is currently an eyesore. Redevelopment will allow the ability of the City to have an excellent entrance to the City. The public area around the pond should encourage active use of the pond for many recreational type uses. With a quality developer the challenge will be making the site work economically. I would ask the City to give the developer an open range (flexibility) of options to make a lasting first impression for all traveling along 1-70. Kent Thompson kthompson@cretrg.com 09/21/2020 1:44 pm Kent Thompson 620 N. 48th Lincoln, 68504 The Colorado River Surfing Association, a non-profit promoting river surfing, endorses this zoning change in the hope that part of the business plan of a cable wakeboard park open to the public, would one day include a "floating wave pool" or a "fixed wave pool". (See "Guide to the major standing wave pool technologies" by WavePoolMag August 27, 2020 https:Hwavepoolmag.com/what-is-standing-wave-technology/) Wave pools mimic stationary standing river waves that allows for ocean style surfing by "landlocked surfers". Stationary standing river waves are very popular and are enjoyed by an ever growing surf community in Colorado and beyond who will literally drop all other life activities to surf the limited number of days during the months of the snow melt/runoff river season that allows for surfing the stationary standing river waves in Colorado. A standing wave pool with stationary wave at the Word Road Pond could be a viable business venture that would extend the popularity of the river surfing experience and healthy enjoyment of surfing endless waves to: Colorado surfers; visiting surfers; and those who would just like to learn to surf. The location of "Planning Area 2" (as described in the zoning change application for the Ward Road Pond) is adjacent to 1-70 and would be visible to the metro area drivers and visitors traveling to/from the mountains on the 1-70 corridor thus making it an ideal location for business open to the public for water recreation such as a cable wakeboard park and stationary wave pool. Colorado River Surfing Association http://coloradoriversurfing.org 09/29/2020 10:24 am David Riordon PO Box 7353 Denver, 80207 Please see attachment/file re: Colorado River Surfing Association (CRSA) comment 09/29/2020 10:24 am in support of Zone Change. 09/29/2020 3:17 pm David Riordon PO Box 7353 Denver. 80207 From: Scott Cutler To: "catrick berrend" Subject: RE: IMS Lake - Access Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2019 10:04:00 AM Attachments: imaoe001.Dno imaae002.aif Hi Patrick— An update for you regarding access. At this time, we are able to accept resubmittaIs and continue processing the application. After reviewing the documents we found Tract A likely grants access to your client's parcel with the adjacent access easement. Howeverwe do not believe that access to be fully secured for a couple of reasons, one due the likelihood of the owner of Tract A to challenge the interpretation that Tract A grants access, and the fact that they have actively barricaded the site to prevent access. Evidence of secure access must be provided prior to plat approval; the most obvious solution is to purchase Tract but we understand it isn't that simple. Even modified easement language to be more specific about the use of Tract A or the public accessing adjacent properties through this easement would be beneficial, but that requires that property owner to agree. This question will come up at City Council and having something stronger than just having the 1989 plat approval with the existing Tract A language will be beneficial to your case. Enjoy your Thanksgiving! Best, Scott Cutler Planner II Community Development Department Office Phone: 303-235-2849 �R50 Marketing Logo ❑® From: Scott Cutler Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 3:28 PM To: 'Patrick berrend' <patrick@thinktankstudio.net> Subject: RE: JMS Lake - Access Quick update, we are meeting with the City Attorney next Monday to discuss. Scott Cutler Planner II Community Development Department Office Phone: 303-235-2849 ❑■ From: Patrick berrend <Datrick(cDthinktankstudio.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 3:22 PM To: Scott Cutler<scutler(cDci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: JMS Lake - Access Scott: Thank you. I am also being told there is an additional title -work exhibit prepared by the title insurer reflecting the nature of the easements. We will have them transit that to you as well. Regards: Patrick Berrend—Architect, NCARB, LEEDap 303.960.9925 IMI From: Scott Cutler[mailtoscutler(cDci.wheatridge.co.usl Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2019 1:52 PM To: Patrick berrend <patrlck(cDthlnktankstudlo.net> Subject: JMS Lake -Access Hi Patrick— We've forwarded the info to our City Attorney who would like to review. He said he should have a definitive read on everything by next Tuesday. Thanks, Scott Cutler Planner II Community Development Department 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2849 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us ❑® CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only forthe use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the Intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately bye -mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original messagefrom your computer, and any networkto which yourcomputer Is connected. Thankyou. I 1 I,4 JMS Lake Holdings LLC a p Parcel: 39-201-01002 //NK = �X/ST/A/4 FFA/GE BWE a 6'x/sr/N6 ,ADW ra 115 1-r Wriv To De-rrc1t.M /A, a /F I DW vER N.FS 4G,errAoLe ✓% To �r,Ess t�wy �E f I I I � I If rvATE^e ,Eb fNN/NL Off' A?Zr-CS I / / / / I I / I / I I / I I / I / I / I I I I / / / / I I / I / I I / I r— I; 1686 490.5 ' 254.6 4'50- W t of Bei N= f68� Na169Rev.2 N 181 Gravel Sondcomp61+Y '- aa ...- - I.. r G6r Ie trr14 IT eve �nskY s A6ner `I e- YQI it / i77 9-13.66 Add Pars 1621 947-66 Add 18WR.82 NICHOLA GARDENS .66 Co 12.9 t ROA urw 3 t`, IS SU$ ON � GOj1` ke GRAVEL a• rr£����11 PIT r Orl1 00 .0". -- prp eel ♦•; � 8 RV EY RAwll en 5 11^58 5p4 k A as F032^tilt) ra r A _p{Illect P�rchc'51 F032- g q Curtis we!/n 14Cft& ,- `J !T A �M n . !Te z Rashes Curtis N. {yelln Ah"� SAA i 1e 6 F Wiliam E. Amen .point s tat rn y.�gRev. par �rA 517-.9 Lot 18.5 {81 ` �� '4 � r3 enc -- er. Gpl T �1O� Cores' m r_ 1-5-66 Name Change Par. 169,170 DI 148-66 CecW Bwdap Por.174RIm D T x21.66 1 oroez;JIS Nes. 16,1II06BFree , C 2D 179661220 la,l@F,1826,]e2H 02.L&MK: pW.r611in 10;aft 1e 6 F Wiliam E. Amen .point s tat rn y.�gRev. par �rA 517-.9 Lot 18.5 {81 ` �� '4 � r3 enc -- er. Gpl T �1O� Cores' m r_ jmaum munon ar xam�n or c we Rwusr w rrtW IN ec. 20 tVi T 3 S.. IS SWWO NalteRre2 l�Ca4 IIS Lot As 8 H. Son q�l �E � T�O R S0`1�o � ,,3r,•lr. e rs. iF GRAVEL l PIT ..... yyyy s -J ~ N I Sonfic, v pvd a �uM++�. E• �A ¢ Purchased, on Pfoled FOZZ-10) It 111144 41%•p/ Lofts PfARG OF THE Vq fy I' 8' 3 '7' 7D� tee, e Lot 13 WKliam E- Atlan o -I lar 3 al �y GRAVEL PIT Lot e r ip.. Carr �[ Qsw a (`18.7N ltl .o-mww 4n.pav � s E/ay E 3 S.egl. h. \J®weAe ti s E� w [{ Iy ak• The following parcels newt soW by �.,,,, the Gglorado Division of Highways p to OC of adjacent properly: oo e Parcels 15208, 182FR, 18213R, IS2HRlISZJR,and 102KR (Shown os IB2Kf�11A a 182KRBI. Sot flab sheets for deloils. 1 Lot 10 KE. V4 Sea 20 T3 S,R69 W for N "wlrt ! eI 1+ ob L Kpy, 'Inn 1414, Sao Wn os a *1044 r+'t Lot /3 �KRBI dlnl almzr Mal.11A � moRsm t70 -3B1266 See IB HT OF WAY M H if Lot l Cpl.-Vc.% 30 J�47. RMSKIRB S ,e ro T :eras G IR]RHim M _ 1/4 Sam 20 2dr-111 p . r30� 2B a2K1U a 112101T 3 S., It 69 W 9-12-64 y� s•a-as Itis so'q — O I a -2w, 211 l Late — p-ISEa ( NICHOLA GARDENS SUB Is+" I Lel` g l 3y N 2S Z4 e rs. iF GRAVEL l PIT ..... yyyy s -J ~ N I Sonfic, v pvd a �uM++�. E• �A ¢ Purchased, on Pfoled FOZZ-10) It 111144 41%•p/ Lofts PfARG OF THE Vq fy I' 8' 3 '7' 7D� tee, e Lot 13 WKliam E- Atlan o -I lar 3 al �y GRAVEL PIT Lot e r ip.. Carr �[ Qsw a (`18.7N ltl .o-mww 4n.pav � s E/ay E 3 S.egl. h. \J®weAe ti s E� w [{ Iy ak• The following parcels newt soW by �.,,,, the Gglorado Division of Highways p to OC of adjacent properly: oo e Parcels 15208, 182FR, 18213R, IS2HRlISZJR,and 102KR (Shown os IB2Kf�11A a 182KRBI. Sot flab sheets for deloils. 1 Lot 10 KE. V4 Sea 20 T3 S,R69 W for N "wlrt ! eI 1+ ob L Kpy, 'Inn 1414, Sao Wn os a *1044 r+'t Lot /3 �KRBI dlnl almzr Mal.11A � moRsm t70 -3B1266 See IB HT OF WAY M H if Lot l Cpl.-Vc.% 30 J�47. S ,e ro T :eras O p . r30� 2B ` rrl.! yv5l�dy B O I 211 l l 3y 2S Z4 ® UMv L. Hookintal .t•n� rsy R. Hofklnser, ® Gulf Oil Carp I b K sol ureonaky �`(rC.s.T81'ra ON. Woodworth V Lyle G. Woodworth i i Mount Olivet Cemetery Association Lee S. Mendel ' 2 I ®® DoriRRaws Ds R. Rows, ® ®almmo 1. Edwprds ® ®Alma I - Edwards ITO ITI Daleled KW. IFI Sec 21 I T.3 S., R 69 YW All I(NowALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS That I, or We, REARM SAND 6 GRAVEL CO7PANr In. Omnis, w G,onbn, d me.. —Count' of aertenve ,and Stated calarsd.. far and Ieonns1dedian al fM nam d TEN DOLLAR;ad dhs, Road ed ukX" onmM atim, left raid Bawler 00=ft n Inbead Od4fMMCW.Mewl NMoab)e)IdaeeldodownsaWP4 have Insides. em obw4sMdadoatwre4ondbr.Ihew prOesme do hereby ORA19 049"At SELL. CaVWYAND CONNFIAW uses The DeyartmentofHighways, State gf Cdor the Orantw, us rnecenwn and awgw fomwL the folneMa rqM and to Is n1d, pop r I Swnb(e the Gx, q Jaffeman ed sic" of Gohwol* awed by WW fists, w Grwlee. M.dh EAG(dNDEPERYeWffOPRMWSGrACCMC r7/EdM4VXRO9d94M2ERS Is and boa M Owl d 6n riRM- of.." M Colorods Side mW,.W Ka 34 .e Rraewry *dWWndaoawdal9 Man Mand non SMted Cabndo. and bn ad b waPNlptJyF.liayl h,I O we'ral Ihe0aontm s,6nws,t ahumn9 upon new wgtmh daq w as,wnlM moewps,iw de¢rlMd an Wines - v, 1 70-3(8)2" Seel 2 Parcel No, 174 Rev. 2 northerly lin 8e8ieainR at a Point on the "at line of tot 12, Nicholas Carden Subdivision In the NO} of 89dtion 20, T. 3 8., R. 69 G., of tW..Siath Principal Meridian, in Jefferson County, Colorido, frog which point the northeast comer of said Section 20 bears N. 63' 35' 15" R. a distance of 1470.5 featZ _r 1. Thence S. 64' 20' 30" W. a distance of 168.4 feat; "] 2. Thence N. 79' 14' W. a distance of 497.1 feet; 3. hence S. e4' 45' 30" V. a dtatanca of 314.5 feat; 4. hsees N. 45' 07' 30"•N. a distance of 70.6 feet; ijr IV r'-„ri �er'z nn4 ry nY. 39 lopeihr with all IM ayprlp Ihmento belonging. Ewpiftlit wsrr, Non 1No grant, IM right M the Ownla Or Creditos M haer the folleMng PON or pints al swan M Inn WeMlare let forth MMIwNr, Mb IIMMd. hares, N of by IM Mellor a Orentae, to iha width and paps, Mrshmtlr do signed: WIDTH USE OR PURPOSE CENTER OF ICC SSOPPOSITE— I;Uvosr ]E no points of access acca ding to orderlln bMllcnino M Ibe MnMaat Project No I 70-3(6)266 See. 2 Forthsr angling Non IN, gnat, Refight of the Onnlor or Orvtlps to )lave Dern anon the aforesaid line Maws of MON plans when possaperayt under and nedw%and pNM openiop in mid Fen sada, may be p%NM fa IMt Popme by am Sealer. This dined. and On rights and Inkmts hrein merP4 shall be and c=HWM a Perpelpl burden open Ihaml Pw- Perty M Or -da a Ow rkw%Mjoking IM MMW"m I bed amu Rha or San. Meanwhich seem will be dshiM,nhardn W tells and shell be binding upon His OraMCr a OrMan, oM all the heirs, succession and aWpq M Iha Grmdva Senlon, j0h respect M add adjoining ml pop". - AM'll��ialtlur� )IM MsrinlwfMdfd rMiM,-aapeMMM,aavbn,odsidnMas asionig ,domrp noµ prod, halgola ab aoerMand MMlbe Man IM sueenren od agipw,lha obew6aphine aeneM rlpMeadlMresfs, In Me RuW aid id" mSerld�il'd nisi li af&iwgeaw>ed ii p %Wdrdi all ant euay pts or pp I" - Way daboigMMdal �, OmwMe M a" pad MreA by lhrmpll ar wtlr Iha DmbM Sa O^i* WAMOWAND FOREVER DEFEND.- — -Z-r . ,c_ .'&Abid,riedldd'abCdelMndML..�J " Xf ). 32. I . 1WT9td6 OMD 6 ORA . CO. "AFFra- II atC{ 1. L 13 A: / I masoning" owner we Mle / %M ".g, A.0, 1956_. TM ae.pdp henMnnM war aaerMmgm �, "Wliae. wlynane nae d/hien oil :• NrOaniiYlalen mein ?1";t Public L rn ]E Ig m '. I •. i fie ga d S it ISIS, g EEd $ggee - € ,S yf P L ♦�4le ® City of Wheat ��e CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT REVIEW DATES: October 1, 2020 (Planning Commission) / November 9, 2020 (City Council) CASE MANAGER: Scott Cutler CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-19-03 / JMS Lake Holdings LLC ODP (Ward Road Pond ODP) ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A-1) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with approval of an Outline Development Plan (ODP). LOCATION OF REQUEST: Southeast Corner of I-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road APPLICANT/OWNER (S): JMS Lake Holdings LLC (Mark Jolstad) APPROXIMATE AREA: 990,248 square feet (22.73 acres) PRESENT ZONING: Agricultural -Two (A-2) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed -Use Employment ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X) Location Map COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DIGITAL PRESENTATION A. =adj Planning Commission 1 Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP Site All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST Case No. WZ-19-03 is an application for approval of a zone change with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at the southeast corner of the Interstate 70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road. The purpose of the request is to change the zoning from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) to allow for a variety of commercial and residential uses on the property. Because the site exceeds one (1) acre in size, the only zone change option is to a planned development or to a mixed-use straight zone district. In this case, the site has unique characteristics, including steep topography, three street frontages, and a pond; so a planned development is the most appropriate option. Rezoning to a planned development in the City of Wheat Ridge entails approval of two documents. The first is the Outline Development Plan (ODP). The approval of the ODP changes the zoning designation on the land, establishes allowed uses and development standards for the property, and establishes access configurations for vehicles and pedestrians. The second document is the Specific Development Plan (SDP), which focuses on specific details of a development such as site design, architecture, landscaping, and drainage design. The SDP must be found to be compliant with the ODP in order to be approved. Section 26-302 of the Municipal Code allows for concurrent or sequential applications for the ODP and SDP. In this case, the applicant is requesting sequential review of the ODP and SDP. The ODP document requires public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council, with the City Council being the final deciding body. If the ODP is approved, the applicant can apply for SDP approval. The SDP application will be heard at Planning Commission, who is the final deciding body for SDP approval. There may be one or more SDPs depending on whether development is phased. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS/PROPERTY HISTORY The site is located at the southeast corner of the I-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road (Exhibit 1, Aerial). The site borders Interstate 70 to the south, Ward Road to the west, I-70 Frontage Road to the north, and an adjacent property zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) to the east. The property is approximately 990,248 square feet (22.73 acres), is in the Nicholas Gardens subdivision, and is currently vacant. The site's primary feature is a large pond that takes up the majority of the site. It is commonly referred to as Ward Road Pond. The site slopes steeply from the frontage road down to the pond (Exhibit 2, �. The majority of the land on the site is located northeast of the pond towards the corner of the frontage road and Ward Road. It is traversed by two irrigation ditches and a gravel access road. A spit of land separates Ward Road Pond from another pond to the east, which is under separate ownership. The spit of land widens to form a rectangular portion that extends into Ward Road Pond. In the 1960s, the site was used as a gravel quarry for the construction of I-70. The property was owned by the City of Arvada from 1974 to 2016, and for a period of nearly 30 years it was leased to Colorado Parks and Wildlife. They stocked the pond for fishing, but discontinued their lease and the fishing Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP pond access in 2015. Fishing access utilized a dirt parking lot (now overgrown) at the northwest corner of the site, but the property was never improved further and is currently vacant. Surrounding properties include a variety of land uses and zoning (Exhibit 3, Zoning Map). Across Ward Road to the west are several properties zoned Commercial -One (C-1) including a large Kaiser Permanente office and four additional office/flex buildings. Across the frontage road to the north are several properties zoned Industrial Employment (I -E). To the east is the adjacent pond property, which is zoned PID and part of the larger Lakemont Center PID which includes the development to the north of the frontage road in that area. The adjacent pond property has not developed but is zoned for a variety of uses including hotel and commercial. To the south is I-70 and the off -ramp to Ward Road. The Wheat Ridge • Ward commuter rail station for the RTD G Line is located approximately a'/2 mile walk away from the subject site. That distance will be reduced further when the City completes the trail and pedestrian bridge on the west side of Lakemont Center connecting the frontage road directly to the station. III. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Attached is a copy of the proposed Outline Development Plan for the site, which contains two sheets (Exhibit 4, Outline Development Plan). The first page is a cover sheet with certification and signature blocks for the property owners, Planning Commission, City Council, and the Mayor. There is also a character of development statement, development standards, planning area standards, open space requirements, and other standard notes. The second page includes the conceptual layout of the property, including access, open space, and planning areas. It also contains a list of proposed permitted uses in each planning area. As noted above the ODP is a property -specific zoning document that establishes the underlying development standards. These are described below, would run with the land if approved, and cannot be changed without going through a subsequent zone change process. Site Configuration and Access The large site is proposed to be split into two "planning areas." Planning Area 1 (PA -1) will be located on the land adjacent to the corner of the frontage road and Ward Road and will be approximately 5 acres. Planning Area 2 (PA -2) will contain the balance of the site, including the pond, some of its banks, and the spit of land on the east side of the pond, totaling nearly 18 acres. The dividing line between the two planning areas is the approximate location of one of the ditches that traverses the site on the slope, traveling from the southwest to the northeast. The portion of frontage road adjacent to the site is under City controlled right-of-way, while Ward Road and the Interstate are both under the control of the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). CDOT will allow only an emergency access on Ward Road, so public vehicular access is proposed to come exclusively from the I-70 Frontage Road. PA -1 will have one primary access point approximately halfway between Ward Road and Van Gordon Street. PA -2 will have one access point at the far east side of the site, with a drive aisle along the spit of land to reach the developable site. The PA -2 access point is not located within the subject site; rather it traverses "Tract A" of the Lakemont Center PID which contains a platted access and utility easement. Staff and the City Attorney have reviewed the access, and are of the opinion that the zoning and subdivision documents for the adjacent property (Lakemont Center) grant sufficient access in this location. Tract A is almost entirely encumbered by access and utility easements and is not developable for any other purpose. Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP Allowable Uses Uses permitted by the ODP vary depending on the planning area. PA -1 allows a wide variety of uses, including residential, public, commercial, hospitality, and offices. PA -2 does not allow residential uses but would also allow the sale of boats to take advantage of the water surrounding the developable land. The full list of uses are shown on page 2 of the ODP document. With the '/2 -mile proximity to the transit station, the list of permitted uses was developed using the MU -C TOD zone district as a basis and with some modifications. The ODP prohibits drive-thrus from both planning areas. Industrial uses are also prohibited. Outdoor storage in association with recreational/retail uses is permitted in PA -2, with limitations. The permitted uses seek to balance the site's proximity to transit, access to water, visibility from the interstate, and adjacency to a state highway. Development Standards The development standards proposed are on page 1 of the ODP document, with some references to the map on page 2. Building Coverage and Setbacks — The maximum building coverage in PA -1 is 70%. This site is smaller at approximately 5 acres and will allow a larger building. An approximate footprint of the building is shown on page 2 of the ODP. PA -1 has build -to requirements in lieu of building setbacks to encourage the building to be constructed close to the streets, creating a more walkable and urban environment. At least 20% of the building must be within 0'-20' of the property line on the frontage road, and 30% of the building must be within 0'-20' of the property line on Ward Road. This requirement will result in a building at the hard corner, with access/parking behind or on the side. Mixed-use zone districts typically require 30-50 percent build -to zones, but due to the prominent slope easement along the frontage road and the length of PA -1, the 20-30 percent requirement was deemed more appropriate for this site and will still achieve the desired urban design. PA -2 does not have a maximum building coverage outlined in the ODP, but is still limited to the approximate footprint shown on page 2. Any additional development in PA -2 would require an amendment to the ODP, which is considered a new rezoning application. PA -2 also has a limited footprint due to the size of the pond and the need for an access road across the spit to the development site. Any building in PA -2 would need to be set back 10 feet from the eastern property line. Parking — The ODP states that parking shall comply with Section 26-1109 of the City Code, which is the parking standard for mixed-use zone districts. In addition, parking for multi -use buildings should be located at the rear or side of buildings and structured parking is encourage where practical. Freestanding commercial buildings may provide surface parking in compliance with the code. Specific parking amounts will be determined at time of SDP and are based on the square footage, uses, and/or amount of residential units. Building height — The maximum building height for PA -1 is 90 feet, or 6 stories, whichever is more restrictive. This helps allow multi -story development on a steeply sloped site. This maximum height is consistent with the allowed maximum height in the MU -C TOD zone district, but taller than the maximum height in the adjacent C-1 zone district of 50 feet. However, there are no adjacent residential properties that would be impacted by a 6 -story building. The maximum height in PA -2 is 35 feet, or 3 stories. Again the standards are balancing the site's infill location between the transit station and interstate. Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP Architecture — Building design is expected to comply with the City's Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) and will be reviewed at time of SDP. Open space — The ODP requires the site to include a publicly -accessible multi -use trail connecting to the City's future linear park north of the frontage road, with a connection to Ward Road as shown on page 2 of the ODP. The ODP also proposes a minimum size of 5 acres for the pond, which also can serve as a stormwater management facility. If a future developer wishes to fill a portion of the pond for future development, a new ODP would be required at that time to establish development standards and land use concepts for that additional developable area. The concept plan on sheet 2 accounts only for the current developable area based on the current size of the pond (approximately 11.5 acres). The minimum pond size was recommended by staff in order to preserve open space and the water amenity on the site, even in the event future development is proposed. In additional to overall open space requirements, the ODP also requires each planning area contain at least 15% landscape coverage which shall be otherwise in conformance with Section 26-502 of the City Code, which discusses landscaping requirements. This landscaping area can include the areas identified as open space on page 2 of the ODP, but not the pond itself. A large portion of the slope is proposed to be preserved as open space, located primarily on the north side of the pond between it and PA -1. Some of the slope along the frontage road is placed in a slope easement which was established with the construction of the road. Code compliance — hi all other areas, the project is proposed to comply with the zoning code including lighting, fencing, streetscape design, and signage. Outdoor storage is permitted in PA -2 in association with boat sales, and must comply with Section 26-628 of the City Code which largely pertains to screening. Drainage As part of the zoning application, the applicant was required to submit a Preliminary Drainage Plan & Letter which provides a conceptual proposal for accommodating stormwater runoff. On-site water quality and detention will be provided to treat and capture runoff from new impervious surfaces and to capture any historical runoff flows; the pond can be used for detention. The Engineering Division has no concerns with the preliminary drainage plan. A full drainage report and final design will be required at the time of SDP application(s). Traffic Staff required inclusion of a Traffic Impact Study with the ODP application which was reviewed by the Engineering Division. As the site is currently vacant, any development on the site will result in a net increase of traffic. The trip generation report is speculative, but it assumed the land uses with the highest trip generation. This means it assumed the most intensive mix of development permitted by the ODP to calculate potential trip amounts, including multifamily housing, commercial retail, recreational vehicle sales (similar to boat sales), and a restaurant use. The development has the potential to add about 2,362 daily trips, with 125 of those occurring in the morning peak hour, and 226 in the afternoon peak hour. The study also includes an analysis of the distribution of trips or a prediction of where vehicles will go when they leave the site. It predicts that most vehicles will exit the site and travel to the signalized frontage road and Ward Road intersection, since there will not be any public access allowed directly Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP onto Ward Road. About 30% of the trips are predicted to utilize Tabor Street off the frontage road and east of the site. The total trip count has to be considered in the context of its proximity to a major highway interchange. Current traffic counts at Ward and the frontage road during the morning peak hour were observed at 3,132 (as noted this site is expected to add 125 to the morning peak). Traffic in the area is expected to increase by 2040, and the additional trips from this site are expected to have little impact on the overall transportation system. The study specifically states: "...the addition of site -generated traffic is expected to contribute no significant impact to traffic operations for the existing and surrounding roadway system." After a review of the study, the Engineering Division agrees with the findings in the report and has no concerns about the existing roadways. At this time, staff is not recommending that the applicant be responsible for specific upgrades to the adjacent roadways beyond routine streetscape enhancements. As noted, the site is also located nearby the Wheat Ridge • Ward commuter rail station, which has the potential to allow for a reduction in traffic generated by multifamily housing if people choose to walk or carpool to the transit station. The area is seeing several significant upgrades to the pedestrian network, including the future pedestrian trail/bridge and sidewalks along Ward Road, the I-70 Frontage Road, and further north on 52°d Avenue due to adjacent development. IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-303.D. The applicant also provided a response to the criteria (Exhibit 6, Applicant Letter). The Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. The proposed development is compatible in terms of land use with the surrounding land uses, and complements the natural features of the site by preserving a significant amount of open space and providing pedestrian amenities. The surrounding area is largely commercial and industrial in nature, so development on this site will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding area. The site has long been vacant for many years, and the area surrounding it has seen major changes in the past 5 years in preparation for the opening of the commuter rail station, including significant residential and commercial development. The proposed zoning and subsequent investment are an appropriate use and will not have an adverse effect. The proposed zoning promotes the health, safety, and welfare of the community and balances the site's proximity to transit, access to water, visibility from the interstate, and adjacency to a state highway. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 2. The development proposed on the subject property is not feasible under any other zone district, and would require an unreasonable number of variances or waivers and conditions. The site's current A-2 zoning appears on the City's earliest zoning maps and is a vestige of its past as a gravel quarry. In today's context, it is an atypical zoning designation for a property with adjacency to an interstate and'/2-mile proximity to a commuter rail station.. Under A-2, the Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP property could be developed for single-family homes on lots of one acre or more, or be used for agricultural purposes. Any other development on the site would require a rezoning to a more permissive zone district. Section 26-30 LB.1 of the City Code requires any application for a zone change for commercial purposes to be to a planned development or mixed-use zone district. Given the proposed variety of uses, the surrounding conditions, the unique topography and presence of a large pond, the PMUD zoning is the most appropriate zone change option. It will also allow the applicant to commit to customized standards for the site, including a customized list of permitted uses and open space requirements. While a mixed-use zoning may be more feasible for other sites in the area, the effect the topography and water have on opportunities for development on the site is substantial and lends itself better to a planned development. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 3. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. Service providers and utility districts have indicated that they have no concerns with the proposal and have indicated they can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. The development of the site will build sidewalks and curb ramps along the street frontages of the site. Exact requirements will be imposed at time of the SDP and subdivision plat review, to comply with the City's Streetscape Design Manual. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 4. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one 1 of the following conditions exists: a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. Within Envision Wheat Ridge (the City's comprehensive plan) the Structure Plan map provides high-level guidance for achieving the City's vision by designating development priorities and future land areas (Exhibit 4, Comprehensive Plan). The "mixed-use employment" designation encompasses the entire Ward Road Pond site as well as all of the area within approximately'/2 mile of the Wheat Ridge • Ward commuter rail station. While not immediately on the site, the map also specifically labels the TOD site as an employment/commercial center. The designation encourages mixed-use development that emphasizes employment complemented with commercial/retail and multifamily housing in a transit -oriented, pedestrian -friendly setting. Buildings in these areas are permitted to be higher intensity than other parts of Wheat Ridge. The more recent Northwest Subarea Plan (2013) depicts the future land use for the subject site as open space, which on the surface conflicts with the comprehensive plan. The plan does describe, however, that the site was selected as a potential open space location because it Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP currently existed as open space. The plan also has a disclaimer that the land use map is intended to be flexible and allow for a variety of development options. The 2017 TOD Vision document depicts the site as containing a mix of office (at the corner of Ward/Frontage) and recreational uses with a potential regional park containing both ponds. After approval of the 2E bond funds, staff explored the viability of a publicly -owned regional park and determined it to be infeasible based on ownership, cost, and site constraints. While a specific, consistent vision for the subject site does not exist across these three planning documents, the ODP attempts to provide a mix of uses that addresses the desires for the greater TOD area. Specifically, the ODP designates a large portion of the lakeshore as open space, and requires the developers of the planning areas to include a publicly accessible pedestrian trail to complement the City's nearby infrastructure investments. Both planning areas permit public and private recreational uses with a public trail and private boat enterprise. Office/employment uses are also permitted in both planning areas. While residential uses are not specifically called out in any document, the site's proximity to the commuter rail station and to other mixed-use zone districts makes it a very viable residential development site. The City understands that "retail follows rooftops" and in order to encourage a mix of employment and retail uses in the TOD area, some residential uses are necessary as transit supportive uses and to support the viability of nearby businesses and employers. With this entitlement, the transit station is essentially bookended by transit supportive densities at the north and south ends of the subarea, with a rich diversity of employment uses in between. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is in error. Staff finds no evidence of an error on the official zoning maps. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing character of the area. The area has seen an increasing interest in development, including the adjacent Lakemont Center property. A large amount of public and private investment is taking place in the area that makes the underlying Agricultural zoning less relevant; the viability of actual agriculture taking place on the site is also dubious given the slope and other existing conditions. The City's investment in the area through the 2E bonds will improve roads in the area, primarily north of the train tracks, and create better conditions for walkable and transit -oriented development. The future pedestrian trail and bridge will directly link this site with the commuter rail station and dense infill development to the north of the tracks. The Ridge at Ward Station and the Hance Ranch developments are providing hundreds of market -rate townhomes within '/a mile of the commuter rail station. Commercial and industrial sites are also being developed or reinvested in, including 12060 W. 52nd Avenue this year, and a new building in Lakemont Center in 2018. Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP The investments and changes complement the diversity of land uses in the area and strengthen the residential and commercial markets. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan. As described in Criteria A above, the City's comprehensive plan was developed in 2009 in the very early stages of planning for the TOD area. FasTracks was approved by Denver area voters in 2004, and the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the G Line occurred from 2007 to 2009 through which a final alignment for the Gold Line was determined. In 2011, the City entered an intergovernmental agreement with RTD which included design parameters for the station. It wasn't until September 2014 that the City approved a special use permit for the site design of the Wheat Ridge • Ward Station. The G Line and station did not open until April 2019 nearly 10 years after adoption of the comprehensive plan. The City has long anticipated a mix of uses in and around the potential transit station, but the specific demand for and location of residential uses could not have been fully anticipated by the comprehensive plan or the Northwest Area plan based on the timeline and evolution of the RTD G Line. The City has since refined a vision for residential and employment and uses, and this zone change is necessary to provide transit -supportive uses that fulfill that vision. Staff concludes that this criterion is has been met. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request. VII. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING & PUBLIC INPUT Pursuant to Section 26-109 of the Code of Laws, the applicant notified all property owners and residents within 600 feet of the site of the neighborhood meeting. Neighborhood meetings are required prior to submittal of an application for a zone change. The neighborhood input meeting was held on June 11, 2019. One (1) member of the public, an adjacent business owner, attended the meeting in addition to the applicant and staff. A summary of the meeting is attached in Exhibit 7, Neighborhood Meering Notes. Public noticing is required prior to public hearings. If any comments are provided prior to the Planning Commission public hearing on October 1, they will be entered into the record and distributed to Commissioners at the public hearing. Comments collected on Wheat Ridge Speaks will also be reviewed by Planning Commissioners and entered into the public record. VIII. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and regarding the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow: Planning Commission Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP Wheat Ridge Engineering Division: No concerns with the ODP. Access configuration is supported as is preliminary drainage. Wheat Ridge Economic Development: No comments at this time. Arvada Fire Protection District: No objections, can serve. Specific comments to be provided at time of SDP. Valley Water District: No objections, can serve. Specific comments to be provided at time of SDP. Fruitdale Sanitation District: Specific comments to be provided at time of SDP. Xcel Energy: No objections, can serve. Century Link: No comments. Comcast: No comments. Colorado Department of Transportation: No concerns with the ODP plans, since access onto Ward Road is limited to emergencies only. CDOT to review construction plans at time of SDP and/or building permit. Mile High Flood District: No concerns. IX. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded that the proposed rezoning and Outline Development Plan are consistent with the zone change criteria. Because the requirements for an ODP have been met and the review criteria support the ODP, a recommendation for approval is given. X. SUGGESTED MOTIONS — ZONE CHANGE (ODP) Option A: "I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-19-03, a request for approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at the southeast corner of I-70 Frontage Road and Ward Road, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan and its vision for transit supportive uses in the Northwest Subarea. 3. The proposed zoning and land use are consistent with the intent of a planned development, compatible with surrounding land uses, and will result in a high-quality development. 4. The infrastructure in the area can support the development. 5. The proposed zoning balances the site's proximity to transit, access to water, visibility from the interstate, and adjacency to a state highway. 6. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request. Planning Commission 10 Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-19-03, a request for approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at the southeast corner of I-70 Frontage Road and Ward Road, for the following reasons: 1..., 2...." Planning Commission 11 Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Plmm; Commsss;on 12 Case No. W 19-031 WaN Pond ODP EXHIBIT 2: TOPOGRAPHY Index contours are shown in brown/orange. Each line represents 5 feet in elevation. The site slopes steeply from the frontage road down to the pond dropping over 50 feet from an elevation of 5465 to 5415. Much of this sloped area will be preserved by the ODP, and any development on the northwest area of land (PA -1) will be required to work with the topography. The spit of land in PA -2 is flat. Planning Commission 13 Case No. WZ-19-03 /Ward Pond ODP EXHIBIT 3: ZONING MAP Plmm; Commsss;on 14 Case No. W 19-031 WaN Pond ODP EXHIBIT 4: OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Attached as an 11x17 document on the following page. Planning Commission 15 Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JM5 LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC. MIXED -LSE DEVELOPMENT IS TO REHABILITATE T4I5 FORMER GROVEL MINE 51TE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SURROUNDING A PRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL Anne UNIQUE AMENITY FOR THE RESIDENTS ANO PATRONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ANO THE GREATER COMMUNITY. THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURRING ON THE LACE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRIMARY GATEWAY' ASPECT OF THIS DEVELOPI-INJt THE PROJECT FAGee8re TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE USES AND DENSRIE5 GIVEN THE PROXIMITY TO THE WHEAT RIDGE - "Fee STATION. A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 15 PROPOSED FOR THE UPEER PLANNING AREA (PAI) WITH RETAIL AMENITIES. THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT A TUD ADDRESS THE SLffET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY TORPre VIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE LOWER PENINSULA 51¢ IN PLANNING AREA (PAD IS FROPOSED TO CONTAIN RETAIL. THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE PECER RECTOT LOCATION AND 51TE V151BIL17Y FROM 1-10 TO SHRCU E WATER SPORTS. THI5 ACTT VItt NODE WCKLD AL50 SERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY, THE KEY FROXIMITY AND VISBILITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARP ROAD, AND WHEAT RIDGE -WARD STATION CORRIDORS WILL OFFER A DUQUE LEVEL OF VITALITY AMR COMMUNITY SYTEAW THAT WILL BE FURTHER RUPARGED BY THE OVERALL cgMPLEMENTARr ARCHILECTURAL, LAWGCAPE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH PLANING AREAS. CASE HISTORY UD Is 03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC PIE VE-Craf Nr ELEMENTS SUCH AS 51TE LAYOUT ADD BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN AlCorre Ep ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MOST BE 505MITTEp AND APP%IVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF ARIGHT -OF -WAY OR BUILDING IFFENT AFPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING AND LOADING & ALL BE IN CCNFORRIANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE W LAWS, WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS/ADDITIONS: PARKIF'GFORMULTI-ILSEBWLDINGE, STOWED BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF BWLDINDE, AND AND STRUCTURED PARKING 15 ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL. FIRESTANDINGCOMMIE SSIAL BINDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PAVING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE EPECIFIC PROPOSED USE, BICYCLE PARKING AND VEHICULAR LOADING FOR PA%ENGER5 AN1D. AS APPROPRIATE MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE R20VIDED IN CLOSE RROXIMITY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL F RIMART STRUCTURES. SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIFPING AVD OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. ALL EXTERIOR LISTATING, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE TW EAT RIDGE CODE CF LAWS. ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAUB, ALL BIGNAGE 5HALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. BILL20AR AS ARE FROHISITEO, ARCHITECTURAL, SITE, AND STREETSCAF E PE51GN SPALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MNLUAL (ASIDE) AND SLREETSCAPE DESIGN MANUAL. OUTDOOR STORAGE: 5OA75 AND INVENTORY ARE 70 BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS IN fei COMPLYING WITH WiEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION D6-6DB STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STRICTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED nossi R£RCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE PRIMARY STRUCN R OR STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT LOT ACCESSORY EUILDMGS SPALL BE COMPRISED OF FORMS, MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITIES OF THE PRIMARY BUILDING, DRIVE THRU'5 ARE PROHIBITED, PLANNING AREA 1 naxlMurl auILD11G COVERAGE MAP: 10% &UILD 10-10 FRpMiKaE ROAD 0-30' FROIM FRCFERII" LINE 20% BUILD TO WARD ROAD I m 30FROM FROPERY LINE 30% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 120' MIN. GO MAX (6 SAOIeE6) PLANNING AREA 2 MAP: 0 200' F0 wX lei MINIMUM SETBACK FROM FROF-ERTY FREDERICK CO 80530 10' FROM EAST FROPERTY LINE MAXIMUM BULPI G HEIGHT NEI AAW �,PH�=�,mm-0. 35' MAX. s STORIES) MIMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS S. tq n & le NICHOLAS GARDENS, E%CEPT THAT TORTpN CONVEYED TO THE DEPT OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21 W IN BOOK 999 AT PAGE M A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST VL OF SECTION A, TOWNSHIP 9 Wert RANGE SS WEST OF THE SM PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 AURES MORE OR LESS (86]$iS3S SF IA) WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION W 49TH STREET F W W 2 H N w O Z O 0 Q CDZ > WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA O Q (Z >Q )-7a VICINITY ARCHITECT: MAP: 0 200' F0 wX lei LAKEWOOD, CO Sent FREDERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MAW JOL5TAD CONTACT: PAlli SQUW p NEI AAW �,PH�=�,mm-0. ARCHITECT, FI OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING A) THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A FDALIOLY-ACCESSIBLE MULTI -WE TRAIL CONNECTINS TO THE ORT'6 LINEAR PARIS NORTH OF THE 1-10 FRONTAGE ROAD. THE FINAL LOCATION, DESIGN, AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS SHALL BE DETHERI AT TIME OF SOP AND PLAT REVIEW THROUGH APPROVAL OF CIVIL CONSTRUCTION OCQUARTNS AND A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGRffEMENT B) THE SITE STALL INCLUDE A POND THAT IS NO LESS THAN FI VE ACRES IN SIZE. el MAY AL50 SERVE AS A As A IT, LeN -DR naNAdersalr HE AREY FOR BE CONS PERE) 1N THEE VENA OF A Na REDUCTION IN TWE 1N RD SIZE (IE, URAL R M N MADE) THE AREA STALL ES CONSIDERED AS CRETIN LREACEOPAB IFA D AREA F IN WR POND SIZE (NATURAL OR MAN MADE) LADED O E A REQUEST FOR INCREASED DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA FROM WHAT IS DEPICTED USE SLEET 2, AN AMENDED ODP SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH DEVELCRIENT STANDARDS, ACCESS, AND LAUD USE CCWJEPTS FOR THE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPABLE AREA U LANDSCAPE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN PA -1 AND PA -2 SHALL BE AT LEAST IS% ADD SHALL OTHERWISE BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26 -SO2 W THE WHEAT RIDGE COPE OF LAWS. O) ARBORIST 5HALL IDENTIFY NON-INVASIVE AND NON-WIISANCE SPECIES OF TREES TO BE RffSE ILEO AND SIGN ANALYSIS 54ALL ACCOMPANY THE SOP WITH THE INTENT TO A HEALTHY AND MATURE GREE CANOPY TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE SJBJECr TO THE REVIEW AND AFPROVAL OF STAFF AND PLANNING COFMI%10N. PROJECT TEAM OWNER ARCHITECT: JETS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLS THINK TANK 51DDI0, INC. leis SOUTH LAKE ROAD F0 wX lei LAKEWOOD, CO Sent FREDERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MAW JOL5TAD CONTACT: PAlli SQUW p 303-618-6663 ARCHITECT, FI 301 SURVEYOR: ANSI EURVED TNG CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTANTS BOULDER. COLORADO W301 420 Not AVENUE CONTACT: ROBERT L RUBINO PL5 LONGMONT, CO W501 (303) 464-9515 CONTACT JOEL BEAMONB, P£. 303-651-6626 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE Tie Sam slpned W XW,, or ADD dymnatatl @0RDS), TRUST, ac money agree For the property Leede tlesonded hereon vkh be doesmapeM as a Plairned oerebpment It savtlaice Kenn the utas, resMc1'ms and comity s PonWPeU In IN, plea aro a, may O1Penwhe be fapFeU b) 1w. I (vel al rental That tis aEpm21 of a reamlq to law all Deakebpment aN apprtrml of Ins iii pun, does not Oeste a :realed proWSYy right Restore poly fl is my only III and acrns Rimm t to tle artanons of 6m[M 26 121 Wife Meet Edge (otle of Lava (Nark Jdelad - mnw, JM5 Lalm MUNI ITTO DATA ce Cobad ) ) son County ce Jefarwn ) May fordeba g InsMtrent was Wenowle$rytl Word The thin �y N � AD. 20— by WCHUC my hand and oH'c'al Per W rommis ew ayires'. Trans Pnidlc BUCE)ROR'S GERIIRCATE Jon nelebv oeNlfv fret ire v y of AT nderbeemy e JM5 eTakenue on an T LLC wore nam ty ire ATTheUndermytl�tenan Wgi tothebestUke operaableharriWaM thd,In nsandrce call aF(Jmba ra acca etanyl Jan ransetl erpre ee SLIT tie acwmpenNnU Flan accUratey represents s31tl surrey (SLAWAR3 Beat Sensors COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE Strafe of cobretll ) )ss Cannot W JeHamn ) I FerelH ceUHy iret OR pan work Hotel b the oreca U the Connie Earn and Ranrtlar of: Jameson Fairly at Wooden Cof at oCIxY ivk on try �yof AD, In Break Magi Rsepten Uo JEFFERSON COUMY CLERK AND RECORDER Ry EVAR, PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION IRSLTRIdetl for approval He tlav of by COTe Most Edge Plamhg Cossink,. Clelrpvxn CITY CE TIRCAMON Agm,af ink tlav W P lie Most Edi Any Corral ATTEST AD Clerk Meyer Canminity Deas pment D'reWa SHEET INDEX: 011 1 COVER 54EEi OUR 21 LAND USE MAP 00 THINKTANK ■■ a t a a I a esiriac n uRr:EeN(n Real JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO : NEE OTE TRACTS 9, 10, n a P{ NICHOLAS GARDENS, EWA THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE REPO OF D H EXM1YTVG STALE RT ON CONVEYED IN A DEED THE DEFT. RECORDED FEBRUARY M 908 IN BOOK 1999 AT PAGE 380. A PORTION OF THE NOHIHE VO OF SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 9111 PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO n -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT MTS ACRES MORE OR LIM(9932993S SF 4-) SEE NOTE 4 LIT 0 < BUILDING PAD m SEE NOTE 2 Q 0 LE UONNM 6 ��\� \O NG�N O V SEE NOTE 4 Lu 1> PLANNING o AREA 1 co 4.86 ACRES Lu v gU\CD\NG E Q GA Q 1� TRACT ,1A1 1-70 NORTH BUILDING PAD >.ESEE NOTE 7 SEE NOTE 2 OPEN SPACE PARKING U r oQ BUILDING PAD m Q PLANNING < SEE NOTE 2 w AREA 2 crF FF 17.87 ACRES F PARKING WARD POND LAND SUMMARY PLANNING AREA 1 456 ACRES PLANNING AREA 2 I1.91 ACRES TOTAL 517E 22.13 4CRE5 PERMITTED USES ALLOUFF) LLSEs PAT I 00 THINKTANK ■■ s , d i , armuttwe Rwaeael9r. Imeows RESIDENTIAL INCLUDING= P A55157ED LIVING FACILITY P O'LELLING, MULTIPLE P PE95rtTE0 ALJD USES ARE SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE. USES NOT u DEEMED EXCLUDED. sTED suALL aE DWELLING, W UE MOVER PaTnok o9TreRa - areniftoOt m3Tc p(pkkMNN3-997 0KIR91 (mbift)309-99T-9948 (maGIM) 303-900A945 PUBLIC, CIVIC AND INSTITO71C INCLUDING: 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PAWING TO BE PERMITTED USES ALLOUFF) LLSEs PAT I PA -2 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDING= P A55157ED LIVING FACILITY P O'LELLING, MULTIPLE P DWELLING, W UE MOVER P PUBLIC, CIVIC AND INSTITO71C INCLUDING: 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PAWING TO BE COMMUNITY BUILDINGS INCLUDING LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P PARKE, OPEN SPACE AND PLAZ4s P P PUBLIC USES AND BUILDIN66 P RECREATION PACITTIRS, INDOOR P P URBAN GARDENS P P UTILITIES, MINOR P COMMERCIAL SERNGES AND RETAIL 6) ORCHES MAY BE F ALIGNED OR EURED AS REQUIRED. ANIMAL DAYCARE P P BANKS AND FINM AL IN57I71170R5 - NO DRI VE THIEL P P BARS, TAVERNS, AND NIGHT CLUBS P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOAT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND TRAILER SALES, RENTALS, <SERVICE LISTED USE, COMPATIBLE IN CHAR46TER AVD IMPACT WITH LESS IN P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P EATING ESTABLISHMENT P P FAST FOOD EATING ESTABLISHMENT - NO DRIVE THRI P P MICRCASSFU£RY, MORODISTLLERT WITH TAP RK)CM P P MIGROBREWERY, MICRODI5TILLERY WITHOUT TAP ROOM P P PIPFCNAL SE OEs P P PHOTOCOPYING AND PRINTING P P PRODUCE STANDS P P RECREATION FACILITIES, COMMERCIAL P P REPAIR RENTAL AND SERMONIC, OF BOATS - OUTDOOR STORAGE P RETAIL SALES UP TO 20000 65F FOR ONE TENAVT SPACE P P URBAN GARDENS P P VETERINARY CLINICS AND HOSPITALS - NO OUTDOOR PENS P P HOSPITALITT AND ENTERTAINMENT ART 57JDI05 AND GALLERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS P STUDIOS, FALLW)NG ART, MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RADIO P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P P ANCILLARY USES PAEn'ING FACILTIEs P P TEMPORARY USES SPECIAL EV 1,75, INCLUDING FESTIVALS AND FARMERS MARKET P P LEGEND: P PERMITTED USE PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT U z 1� Q V 1 z IL w 0 z IL U1 aLd v Y z V PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN O AD 120' SKETCH PLAN O D P GRAPHIC SCALE I' = 60'-O" 2 JOB NUMBER SHEET NOTES. - U EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SIAPUPOT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT - PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'A' ADHERE5 TO - ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO'DECLARAMON OF EASEMENT' - AND ECORDED PLAT. 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PAWING TO BE DETERMINED AT SDP 505MITTAL. _- 3) EMERGENCY SERVICE, INGRESS A EGRESS ONLY. 4) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONNECT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH ORO55 WALK / ACROSS 1-10 FRONT ROAD. 6) ORCHES MAY BE F ALIGNED OR EURED AS REQUIRED. _- l) SLOPE EASEMENT BOJNDARY. 8) THE COMMUNITY DEVELC ENT DIRECTOR HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SEE NOTE 3 11 DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE 50 PERMITTED CR ALLOIIED ON THE 54516 OF rc BEING SIMILAR TO A 1 LISTED USE, COMPATIBLE IN CHAR46TER AVD IMPACT WITH LESS IN THE ZONE DISTRICT, CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT, ANO WHICH WOULD NOT 5E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BY REASON GA5 NOISE RADIATION, HEAT, GLARE, VIBRATION, OF ODOR DUST, FUiME5TION SIT E DGDNDARy , ITRAFFICOR NOT HAZARDOUS Tb HE HEALARRING TH DME5SATPnOF �RROEUNDINOR IG REAS THROUGH DANGER OF FIRE OR EXPLOSION THE D1FCC7OR 5 DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE SOARED OF ADJUSTMENT AS AN INTERRRETATION •�I REQUEST. PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT U z 1� Q V 1 z IL w 0 z IL U1 aLd v Y z V PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN O AD 120' SKETCH PLAN O D P GRAPHIC SCALE I' = 60'-O" 2 JOB NUMBER EXHIBIT 5: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The following is an excerpt from the Structure Map within the Comprehensive Plan. Kaiser ■Mixed -Use Commercial im Planning Commission Case No. WZ-19-03 / Ward Pond ODP w ' Z Tabor P, OS[)CCI I ake Subject Property I� Primary YN Gateway RM r Neighborhood + Commercial Corridor „.,m NNyM1Dalioetl / 4 17 EXHIBIT 6: APPLICANT LETTER NN THINKTANK ■■ t u d i o sciptamure aroaa design mtedors 16 -March -20 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Atmr: Lauren Mikulak — Planning Manager Reference: 1MS Lake—Request for Rezone Application w/ ODP 1MS Lake Holdings, LLC (Applicant) Dear Ms. Mikulak: Please seethe attached Land Use Case Processing Application and supporting ODP materials for your review and consideration of the proposed -JM5 Lake' project request for re -zoning of the subject parcel located at the NE corner of Ward Road and Interstate 70 consisting of Tracts 9-12 Nicholas Gardens. (Address THD) Project Site: The 22.73 acre subject parcel was originally platted in Jefferson County as part of the Nicholas Gardens Subdivision in 1907 prior to the incorporation of the City of Wheat Ridge. The original historic use of the site is unknown. More recently, the property was an active gravel mine to support the construction of the Interstate 70 road grade. When mining operations ceased the natural springs and seepage from the onsite irrigation ditch infrastructure created the pond covering approximately 51%of property. As a result of the mining activity, the remaining portion of the property consists lmirlyofsteep, tree covered, gravel embankments to the waterline averaging 5:1 slopes. These slope areas consist of approximately 4G% of the ental site area. Additionally, a small peninsula which housed the excavation equipmentjute Into the lake creating an approximately 2 acre site with related site access consisting of approximately 9% of the overall site area. The previous land owner, The City of Arvada in association with the Colorado Department cf W ildlife informally allowed limited public access to the shoreline for fishing. The present owner (applicant) purchased the property in its existing condition in July of 2016 with the goal of rehabilitating this malutained and undarutlllzed property into a key recreational and mixed-use gateway project at one of the principal entrances to the City of Wheat Ridge. Project Scopa: The applicant proposes to re -cone the 2273 acre subject parcel from Its current Agricultural Two (Ag -Two) designation to the Planned Mixed Use Development IPMUD) zone district to provide the necessary flexibility for the future redevelopment of this site. The proposed project scope will entail a mix of commercial, retail and residential uses surroundlug o private lake & linear open space feature for the enjoyment of the residents and patrons. PO. Box ]81, Fredrr6k COOraW 805309781 n 303.99.49M Plmming Commission 18 Care No. WZ19-03/ Ward Pond ODP The app llcant Is proposingto develop the subject property In two phases/ pl a nn Ing areas for consideration: A ba ltl- famlly residential community is proposed for the upper Plan n Ing Areal and will consist of or d rise, multi -family apartments with complementary retall amenities configured amp structured parking integrated and concealed within the exls[Ingslte topography. Thearchnecture will frontand addressthe street (1-70 Frontage Road -North) as well as future Ward Station pedestrian corridors as outlined in the Wheat Ridge - Ward Station Vision. Additionally, the proposed development will take advantage of the existing topography of the hlghpoint of the site to provide views of and additional pedestrian access to the linear open space feature and the lakefront on the property. The lower, peninsula site In Planning Area 21s proposed to house a retail marine dealership & service facility, a wakeboard cable park and a feature restaurant. The design intent for this area is to take advantage cribs Inherent water front character and develop the architecture, the landscape and the site amenities into a feature recreational and residential destination. We believe the PMUD zone district and related land use regulations as prescribed by the City of Wheat Ridge afford the Applicant the necessary flexibility for the proposed site program. ODP Review Criteria: We believe this request for re zone meets the intent and requirements of 426-303.D of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code for the following reasons: 1. We believe the rehabilitation ofthis vacant brownfield site interne benefit of life, safety and welfare ofthe subject property and to the community at -large. The proposed redevelopment will allow the applicant the ability to significantly improve the property by fostering new community enhancing businesses, residences and amenitlec which will ameliorate the previous derelict use of the property. Further, the Integration of this property within the surrounding Ward Station TOD development is an inherent benefit not only to the applicant, but also to the future residents, business operators and the surrounding community as a whole - 2. The proposed concept for Planning Area 1 and Planning Area 2 is not possible under the present Ag -Two zone district regulations and could only be accomplished with the inherent flexibllity afforded by a rezone to the PMUD mixed-use zone district. 3. Present locatlonsofspedal fistricrutflity Infrastructure and municipal Infrastructure includingsite accesses, Flue -protection and site utllitles will be sultable for the applicant as connect to serve the project The applicant will provide for the Infrastructure on private property as required to facilitate connection to special district and municipal services. 4. Review Criteria Cond ltlons: a. We bel leve the proposed request for rezone Is in of lgn mens with the City of Wheat Ridge Oamprehensive Plan, Wheat Ridge - Northwest Subarea Plan and Wheat Ridge - Word Station Vision documents in which, the subject property is depicted as a regional park. While the proposed developmentwill remain private property, the proposed mix of uses is largelyfocused around the recreational amenities afforded bythe lake and waterfrontareas of the site which are proposed to remain and be enhanced. The developed site would retain an atypically large percentage of open space due to the presence of the lake and waterfront. The intent of the prosed land -use, density and character of the development dovetails well with the overall nature and character outlined in the aforementioned vision documents as well as with the development currently in progress immediately north of Imports. b- Not Applicable u We believe that the adjacent RTD Ward Station project and the related TOD development surrounding the codon area Is so broad reaching in Its effects on this area of Wheat Ridge, that It Is Indeed in the Interest of the community to encourage redevelopment of this site at this time. The redevelopment of this specific site as a key gateway from Ward Road and as a feature recreational and open space amenlry has been widely published in both the Plodding Commission 19 Col. WZ19-03/ Ward Pond ODP Wheat Ridge — Word Station Vision and the Wheat Ridge - Northwest Subarea Plan documents. We believe that the inherent synergy between the development of the Ward Station area and this proposed development is indeed in the public interest and further W be occurring in close proximity and time frame to each other in mutually benefit both projects as well as greater Wheat Ridge. d. Not Applicable OOP Checklist Criteria: We believe the proposed request for change of zone district is fundamentally necessary for the Applicant to rehabilitate this property in virtually any manner. This is due To the limitations of permitted and conditional uses, building types, densities and geometric configurations, etc. as prescribed by the current Ag -Two zoning district designation of the subject property. Since the conclusion of gravel mining operations on this site, the property has remained vacant and undeveloped. As such, this property remains one of the last remaining properties in the vicinity retaining the original Ag -Two zone designation. This is contrasted with the neighboring C-1, FE and PID zone districts. The proposed PMUD zone district in addition to providing the Applicant the flexibility required for this proposal would also be more complementary with the existing neighboring zone districts and the projected development on those properties. This property location aligns with stated goals within both the Wheat Ridge — Ward Station Vision and the Wheat Ridge - Northwa t5obarea Plan documents of creating a gateway from the 1-70 & Ward Road interchange into the Ward Station area. We believe the proposed development and rehabilitation will focus on the positive open space and recreational aspects of this site such as the lake and the topography and utilize them to best advantage to create a vibrant mixed-use community that would complement and enhance the current development occurring in the immediate vicinity of this site and provide the gateway focus onto Ward Road and the Ward Station area from the Interstate. We bel [eve the scale and density of proposed development would also be commensurate to that which Is being developed in the immediate vicinity Site access is currently being studied in conjunction with CDOT and the City of Wheat Ridge Engineering Department to best meet the needs of the development and restrictions on the adjacent arterials. We believe that the best access to the upper Planning Area 1 will be from the 1-70 Frontage Road — North, approximately mid -block, a minimum of 350 feet East of Ward Road. The proposed access to Planning Area 2 will be the historic access pant just past the apex of the cure on 1-70 Frontage Road — North. There is presently a curbcuiatth[s location and there is an access and drainage service easements In place on the property at this location to facilitate access m the peninsula site. Our meetings with both CDOT and Arvada Fire Department have indicated that no new access from or on to Ward Read would be permitted due to COOT design criteria and the future modifications to the Ward Read off ramp. The existing access to SW corner of this site from Ward Road would be permissible to remain for a gated emergency and service ingress and egress only. Utility infrastructure services delivered to the site are all presently contained within the 1-70 Frontage Road —North, and the connections will be proposed at or near the site access points identified for Planning Area I& Planning Area 2 respectively Special District utilities are provided by Valley Water District and Fru[tdale Sanitation District. Energy infrastructure is provided by %cel Energy. The subject property is currently within the service area of the Wheat Ridge Police Department and Arvada Fire Protection District. Preliminary inquiry with Arvada Fire Protection has indicated feasibility for the proposed uses Planning Commission 20 Case No. WZ19-03/ Ward Pond ODP and access points, with the engineering of fire protection water service needs to each planning area to be determined at the time of site development. To conclude, we again believe this application for re -zoning of the subject parcel is in keeping of the intent and statutory requirements prescribed in the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code as well as the guidelines outlined in the Wheat Ridge — Ward Station Vision and the Wheat Ridge - Northwest Subarea Plan documents. We believe this proposed application for re -zone to be complementary and synergistic with the development activities underway in the immediate vicinity. We look forward to receiving your input and feedback on this proposal. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or should you require further information. Regards: Patrick Berrend —Architect, NCARB Via: Electronic Enclosures: ODP Application Materials Planning Commission 21 Case No. WZ-19-03 / Ward Pond ODP EXHIBIT 7: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING NOTES Meeting Date: Attending Staff: Location of Meeting: Property Address: Property Owner(s): Property Owner(s) Present? Applicant: Applicant Present? Existing Zoning: Existing Comp. Plan: June 11, 2019 Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner Scott Cutler, Planner II City of Wheat Ridge Recreation Center Southeast corner of W. I-70 Frontage Road N and Ward Road JMS Lake Holdings (Mark Jolstad) Yes Mark Jolstad Think Tank Yes Agricultural -Two (A-2) Mixed -Use Employment The following is a summary of the neighborhood meeting: • In addition to the applicant and staff, one (1) member of the public attended the neighborhood meeting. • Staff discussed the site and its zoning. • The applicant and members of the public were informed of the process for a Planned Development. • The members of the public were informed of their opportunity to make comments during the process and at the public hearings. • Meeting attendees were able to provide comments on the proposal. The following comments were made regarding the PMUD request and proposed development: Discussion about the adjacent property owner to the east regarding an access easement and their potential refusal to acknowledge it. Can the City enforce a blocked easement? Blocked easements on private property are civil matters to be dealt with between the two property owners. The City acknowledges an access easement across "Tract A" in Lakemont Center but discussions of the easement need to be between the property owners. Planning Commission 22 Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP • Discussion about CDOT access easement off of Ward Road. • Discussion about mixed-use zoning to be developed in 2 phases. Staff discussed the Planned Development process and recommended a Planned Mixed Use Development over a straight zone district such as Mixed Use Commercial Transit Oriented Development (MU -C TOD) due to the developability challenges of the site including topography and water. If the rezoning is approved, the next step would be a Specific Development Plan for each of the two phases. • Discussion with the applicant about permitted uses. Staff recommended no conditional uses in the use chart, just show the proposed permitted uses. Processing a conditional use with a planned development is uncommon. • Does CDOT have an access plan or roadway classification for Ward Road? Staff was not sure but gave contact information for CDOT representatives. The application will also be referred to CDOT, and they would have to approve any access and construction in their right-of-way on Ward Road. Planning Commission 23 Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Pond ODP City of �Wh6at�dgc POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO. WZ-19-03 / Ward Pond ODP PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE: October 1, 2020 residing at z2 (address as the applicant for Case No. WZ-19-03 hereby certify that I have posted the sign for Public Notice at Southeast comer of I-70 Frontage Rd. N and Wad Road (I o c at i on) on this 17 day of September and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day of public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position 1 on the map below. Signature: NOTE: This form must be submitted to the Commumty Development Department for this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file. WZ-19-03 Ward Road Pond (southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road N and Ward Road) Request for approval of a zone change to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) Planning Commission October 1, 2020 1 24 �R" iL88RR ";. Jo t1 F. j 1 . M --z ■■ ppppr - �i .. ... } . Li l -- r d w _ W 4 40'TH AVE - w L]�—E a rd c . '14M-.Wl o �ct IA a rd Planned Development Process Step 1- Outline Development Plan: — Accompanies the zone change request — Establishes development standards, uses, density — Establishes general site layout and access Step 2 - Specific Development Plan: — Provides a more detailed review of the proposed We are here development: e.g. architecture, landscaping, site design — Must be compliant with approved ODP Step 3 - Subdivision: — To remove internal lot lines, sell/develop lots separately, and establish additional easements — Will typically accommodate SDP 0 BUILDING PAD SEE NCTE 2 SEE NOTE 4 I HAOT "A" SEE NOTE 4 e _ O _ U Y Q _ a_ \ 0 m< w� c~—n ORT _ w PARKING SEE NOTE7 BUILDING PAD L< P R NAING SEE NOTE 2 OPEN SPACE Mme/.88 ACRE a EE' DEO U I aBOVEI -� SPE 7' C 5QP PLANNING AREA 2 U Y Q BUILDING PAD SEE NOTE 2 a_ \ 0 m< w� c~—n 17.87 ACRES PARKING W@rc7 Gdoad pcnc7 AI PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DE`J-- 0 a r �mnuuu SEE NOTE 4 aaa�a,P•,p,a••+• .•paa•♦aaa• � �. PLANNING AREA 1 EM OPEN SPACE 4.86 ACRES- owsoos' 00 VY, 00 �N "so 00 00 V WO Goals',W ow 00 01 00y_f' -.ddsbL T, EE NC OPEN SPACE ` EE 1\,()TE 7- - s � .nnow"�'•i ,'„' OQ � -PAG PLANNING AREA 2 17.87 ACRES SEE NOTE 4 P ,Fll' '; ) oQ Y I vv E i TILE I F -E m a EE TE w _ I FAFKING Development Standards PROPOSED ZONING: PMUD (with ODP) Uses Selected MU -C TOD uses, plus additional recreational and sales uses Architecture Comply with Architectural and Site Design Manual Building PA -1: 90' or 6 stories Height PA -2: 35' or 3 stories Parking Comply with Mixed Use code section, based on use or unit count Setbacks PA -1: 0'-20' build to from Ward Rd (30%) and Frontage Rd (20%) PA -2: 10' from eastern property line Landscape 15% of each planning area (not including water) Pedestrian trail connecting to City's future trail/bridge to TOD 0 WS G I I' Kaiser Vampus --I r c Nil .- ' I II � � 11 I � I, N vv 7f E S Process Neighborhood Meeting — Held on June 11, 2019 — 1 attendee from the surrounding area Referral — No concerns from outside agencies or City departments 15 -day Public Hearing noticing for Planning Commission — Wheat Ridge Speaks 14'= Findings ODP Findings: — Allows for a compatible land use — Complies with comprehensive plan and City's vision for transit -supportive uses in the Northwest Subarea — Provides opportunity for reinvestment —The infrastructure in the area can support the development —The criteria used to evaluate a zone change support the request Staff Recommendation ODP: Staff recommends approval 14'= o® 14--t o® Columbine Tree Service, Inc. 5790 West Coalmine Avenue Littleton CO 80123 June 15, 2020 Scott Cutler — Case Planner Wheat Ridge Community Development Dept. 7500 West 29' Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Mr. Cutler: I am writing to you at the request of Mark Jolstad regarding his property at the SE corner of Ward Road and 1-70 Frontage Road North. Columbine Tree Service, Inc. is licensed arborist with 47 years of experience in Metro Denver. We were hired by Mark to perform tree maintenance on the existing property. This included removal of invasive and nuisance species as well as pruning of remaining viable tree species on the property. The vast majority of the trees and woody shrubs removed as part of our property maintenance were invasive and nuisance species including the following: Siberian Elm (Ulmus pumila) Russian Olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) Plains Cottonwood (Populus deltoids, sargentii, monilifera, etc.) Tree of Heaven (Ailanthus altissima) Tamarisk (Tamarix ramosissima) These trees are well documented as invasive and nuisance species for their adverse effects on waterways as well as crowding out other desired species of trees and shrubs and their structural weakness to snows and wind. Additionally, the only native species, (Plains Cottonwood) seen on the property were largely volunteer female seeded trees, which are generally not desirable in urban landscapes. There were very few trees present that would be considered desirable and worth conserving. These were primarily various varieties of Green Ash and Hackberry, all of which were unmaintained volunteers. The Green Ash varieties are also susceptible to the Emerald Ash Borer and may potentially already be contaminated. These existing species of approximately 3 inch caliper and larger were pruned and left in place. I would estimate this to be less than 5% of the trees on the site. It should be noted that any change to the existing grading of the site greater than approximately 3-4 inches plus or minus during future construction will result in the die -off of existing trees. In our opinion, a more effective plan for long- term sustainable trees on this site would be to plant regionally accepted; cold, drought and pollution tolerant species once the final grading of the site is established. The site specific selection of future specimens, their controlled planting, irrigation and long term maintenance will result in a more healthy and long-lived urban forestry than trying to preserve the handful of existing trees present. Please contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely: C�C���►n-` Tim Fohn — Owner (303) 979-5330 TRACTS 9, 10, 11, & 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1968 IN BOOK 1999 AT PAGE 368. A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST % SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6T" P.M., COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO, CONTAINING 22.73 ACRES MORE OR LESS (990,248.38 SF +/-) A.L.T.A./N.S.P.S. LAND TITLE SURVEY A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 1 OF 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1968, IN BOOK 1999, AT PAGE 368, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 12, FROM WHICH POINT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST BEARS NORTH 63°35'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1470.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64°20'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 468.4 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79°14' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 497.1 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89°45'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 314.5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45°07'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 70.6 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°00'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.1 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14°02'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 103.1 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, SAME BEING THE EASTERLY PRESENT RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE (NOVEMBER, 1964) OF WARD ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE SAID EASTERLY PRESENT RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE, SOUTH 00'00'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 873.8 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, THE SAME BEING THE NORTH RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF A DEDICATED ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT—OF—WAY LINE OF THE DEDICATED ROAD, NORTH 64°20'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1442.6 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS; THENCE ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 12, NORTH 00'16' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 88.6 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN RULE AND ORDER RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1972, IN BOOK 2336, AT PAGE 579, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9 WHICH IS 161.7 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, THENCE SOUTH 9'55'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 203.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0°00'15" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9, A DISTANCE OF 110.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4°00'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 142.9 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14'02'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 103.1 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9; THENCE NORTH 0°00'15" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9, A DISTANCE OF 352.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1988, AT RECEPTION NUMBER 88105019, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A PORTION OF TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE SOUTH 0°18'19" EAST (ASSUMED BEARING), ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 9, A DISTANCE OF 43.98 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.; THENCE SOUTH 0°15'12" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 55.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12°14'03" EAST, 45.81 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 27.00 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 73°15'10"; THENCE NORTH 85°29'12" EAST 221.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89°07'50" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12, A DISTANCE OF 366.43 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 974.00 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°20'54"; THENCE SOUTH 76°31'16" EAST, 16.17 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 367.03 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49°12'05", TO THE NORTH LINE OF TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12; THENCE SOUTH 89°07'50 WEST, 1178.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. SCHEDULE B -SECTION 2 TITLE EXCEPTION COMMENTS: 9. DITCH RIGHT—OF—WAY, AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF NICHOLAS GARDENS, RECORDED APRIL 25, 1907, AT RECEPTION NUMBER 72347. (EXISTING DITCHES ARE PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON) 10. PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF COLORADO UTILITY EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 6, 1988, AT RECEPTION NUMBER 88087096. (PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON) 11. STORM SEWER EASEMENT, GRANTED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1988, AT RECEPTION NUMBER 88105017. (PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON) 12. SLOPE EASEMENT, GRANTED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1988, AT RECEPTION NUMBER 88105018. (PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON) 13. RESERVATION OF RIGHT—OF—ENTRY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1988, AT RECEPTION NUMBER 88105019. (PLOTTED AND SHOWN HEREON) 14. EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES. (NOT ADDRESSED) GENERAL NOTES: 1. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATE SHOWN HEREON. 2. THIS A.L.T.A./N.S.P.S. LAND TITLE SURVEY, AND THE INFORMATION HEREON, MAY NOT BE USED FOR ANY ADDITIONAL OR EXTENDED PURPOSES BEYOND THAT FOR WHICH IT WAS INTENDED AND MAY NOT BE USED BY ANY PARTIES OTHER THAN THOSE TO WHICH IT IS CERTIFIED. 3. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY RUBINO SURVEYING TO DETERMINE OWNERSHIP OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD, RIGHT OF WAY OR TITLE OF RECORD. RUBINO SURVEYING RELIED UPON STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, COMMITMENT NO. 15000310328, EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 30, 2015. 4. THE BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20 WHICH IS ASSUMED TO BEAR N89`27'15"E BETWEEN MONUMENTS FOUND AND DESCRIBED HEREON. 5. THIS SURVEY IS VALID ONLY IF PRINT HAS SEAL AND SIGNATURE OF SURVEYOR. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: TO: MARK JOLSTAD; STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH 2016 MINIMUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDES ITEMS 1, 2, 4, 6(a), 7(a) 8, 9 AND 11(a) OF TABLE A THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON 9/15/18. ROBERT J. RUBINO, PLS 14142 S 14142 10/ 19/ 18,' y4fu udllealm �'`�� prepared by: RUBINO SURVEYING 3312 AIRPORT ROAD BOULDER, COLORADO 80301 (303) 464-9515 f C0� N 1/4 COR SEC 20 J FIND BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX PLS ILLEGIBLE GD N 1/4 COR SEC 20 FIND BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX PLS ILLEGIBLE A.L.T.A./N.S.P.S. LAN® TITLE SURVEY A PORTION OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, REG NG/�80 6969 X30' INGRESS EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT )T 1 BLOCK 2 CENTER - STAGE 2 E COR NW1/4 NE1/4 J89°27'15" E V 1323.45' �E COR SEC 20 -ND BRASS CAP IN RANGE BOX PLS ILLEGIBLE LOT 1 BLOCK 2 LAKEMONT CENTER - STAGE 2 LAKE i E / BILLBOARD SIGN / / / / / / / / GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. R x ' UHIL Ul JURVLI: DRAWN BY: BR 2001 From: Scott Cutler To: "oatrick berrend"; "Mark ]olstad" Subject: Ward Pond DDP - Public Hearings Date: Tuesday, September 8, 2020 1:43:00 PM Attachments: imaae001.ono Patrick and Mark— We've determined that the ODP is ready for public hearings. I will make one last run through the document to make sure no final edits need to be made. Zone changes require two public hearings, one recommendation hearing at Planning Commission, and then a final decision on the ordinance at City Cou ncil. The proposed hearing dates are below: October 1, 2020 at 7pm — Planning Commission November 12, 2020 at 7pm—City Council Please let me know by this Thursday if these dates work for you, as we must publish the hearing dates by Friday. You will need to be available for questions during the hearings, which are currently being conducted virtually via Zoom. If these dates work, I will need a presentation for Planning Commission from you by next Thurdsay, September 17 at noon (at the very latest). We publish our staff reports, staff presentations, and applicant presentations on wheatridgesneaks.ore two weeks in advance of the hearing date, which is why the presentation deadline is next Thursday. I will send instructions for the presentation later this week, but they are typically 5-8 minutes in length and will allow you to introduce yourself and the proposal. Typically, an applicant narrates over PowerPoint slides with some introduction and description of the site layout and intended use. Staff will handle the technical aspects in our presentation, including the zoning, engineering, process, etc. Thanks, Scott Cutler, AICP Planner II Community Development Department 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2849 www.cimheatridge.co.us Email ❑® CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only forthe use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the Intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately bye -mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original messagefrom your computer, and any networkto which yourcomputer Is connected. Thankyou. CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JM5 LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC. MIXED -LSE DEVELOPMENT IS TO REHABILITATE T4I5 FORMER GROVEL MINE 51TE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SURROUNDING A PRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL Anne UNIQUE AMENITY FOR THE RESIDENTS ANO PATRONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ANO THE GREATER COMMUNITY. THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURRING ON THE LACE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRIMARY GATEWAY' ASPECT OF THIS DEVELOPI-INJt THE PROJECT FAGee8re TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE USES AND DENSRIE5 GIVEN THE PROXIMITY TO THE WHEAT RIDGE - "Fee STATION. A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 15 PROPOSED FOR THE UPEER PLANNING AREA (PAI) WITH RETAIL AMENITIES. THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT A TUD ADDRESS THE SLffET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY TORPre VIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE LOWER PENINSULA 51¢ IN PLANNING AREA (PAD IS FROPOSED TO CONTAIN RETAIL. THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE PECER RECTOT LOCATION AND 51TE V151BIL17Y FROM 1-10 TO SHRCU E WATER SPORTS. THI5 ACTT VItt NODE WCKLD AL50 SERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY, THE KEY FROXIMITY AND VISBILITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARP ROAD, AND WHEAT RIDGE -WARD STATION CORRIDORS WILL OFFER A DUQUE LEVEL OF VITALITY AMR COMMUNITY SYTEAW THAT WILL BE FURTHER RUPARGED BY THE OVERALL cgMPLEMENTARr ARCHILECTURAL, LAWGCAPE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH PLANING AREAS. CASE HISTORY UD Is 03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC PIE VE-Craf Nr ELEMENTS SUCH AS 51TE LAYOUT ADD BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN AlCorre Ep ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MOST BE 505MITTEp AND APP%IVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF ARIGHT -OF -WAY OR BUILDING IFFENT AFPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING AND LOADING & ALL BE IN CCNFORRIANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE W LAWS, WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS/ADDITIONS: PARKIF'GFORMULTI-ILSEBWLDINGE, STOWED BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF BWLDINDE, AND AND STRUCTURED PARKING 15 ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL. FIRESTANDINGCOMMIE SSIAL BINDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PAVING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE EPECIFIC PROPOSED USE, BICYCLE PARKING AND VEHICULAR LOADING FOR PA%ENGER5 AN1D. AS APPROPRIATE MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE R20VIDED IN CLOSE RROXIMITY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL F RIMART STRUCTURES. SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIFPING AVD OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. ALL EXTERIOR LISTATING, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE TW EAT RIDGE CODE CF LAWS. ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAUB, ALL BIGNAGE 5HALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. BILL20AR AS ARE FROHISITEO, ARCHITECTURAL, SITE, AND STREETSCAF E PE51GN SPALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MNLUAL (ASIDE) AND SLREETSCAPE DESIGN MANUAL. OUTDOOR STORAGE: 5OA75 AND INVENTORY ARE 70 BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS IN fei COMPLYING WITH WiEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION D6-6DB STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STRICTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED nossi R£RCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE PRIMARY STRUCN R OR STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT LOT ACCESSORY EUILDMGS SPALL BE COMPRISED OF FORMS, MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL QUALITIES OF THE PRIMARY BUILDING, DRIVE THRU'5 ARE PROHIBITED, PLANNING AREA 1 naxlMurl auILD11G COVERAGE MAP: 10% &UILD 10-10 FRpMiKaE ROAD 0-30' FROIM FRCFERII" LINE 20% BUILD TO WARD ROAD I m 30FROM FROPERY LINE 30% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 120' MIN. GO MAX (6 SAOIeE6) PLANNING AREA 2 MAP: 0 200' F0 wX lei MINIMUM SETBACK FROM FROF-ERTY FREDERICK CO 80530 10' FROM EAST FROPERTY LINE MAXIMUM BULPI G HEIGHT NEI AAW �,PH�=�,mm-0. 35' MAX. s STORIES) MIMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS S. tq n & le NICHOLAS GARDENS, E%CEPT THAT TORTpN CONVEYED TO THE DEPT OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21 W IN BOOK 999 AT PAGE M A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST VL OF SECTION A, TOWNSHIP 9 Wert RANGE SS WEST OF THE SM PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 AURES MORE OR LESS (86]$iS3S SF IA) WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION W 49TH STREET F W W 2 H N w O Z O 0 Q CDZ > WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA O Q (Z >Q )-7a VICINITY ARCHITECT: MAP: 0 200' F0 wX lei LAKEWOOD, CO Sent FREDERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MAW JOL5TAD CONTACT: PAlli SQUW p NEI AAW �,PH�=�,mm-0. ARCHITECT, FI OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING A) THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A FDALIOLY-ACCESSIBLE MULTI -WE TRAIL CONNECTINS TO THE ORT'6 LINEAR PARIS NORTH OF THE 1-10 FRONTAGE ROAD. THE FINAL LOCATION, DESIGN, AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS SHALL BE DETHERI AT TIME OF SOP AND PLAT REVIEW THROUGH APPROVAL OF CIVIL CONSTRUCTION OCQUARTNS AND A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGRffEMENT B) THE SITE STALL INCLUDE A POND THAT IS NO LESS THAN FI VE ACRES IN SIZE. el MAY AL50 SERVE AS A As A IT, LeN -DR naNAdersalr HE AREY FOR BE CONS PERE) 1N THEE VENA OF A Na REDUCTION IN TWE 1N RD SIZE (IE, URAL R M N MADE) THE AREA STALL ES CONSIDERED AS CRETIN LREACEOPAB IFA D AREA F IN WR POND SIZE (NATURAL OR MAN MADE) LADED O E A REQUEST FOR INCREASED DEVELOPABLE LAND AREA FROM WHAT IS DEPICTED USE SLEET 2, AN AMENDED ODP SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH DEVELCRIENT STANDARDS, ACCESS, AND LAUD USE CCWJEPTS FOR THE ADDITIONAL DEVELOPABLE AREA U LANDSCAPE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN PA -1 AND PA -2 SHALL BE AT LEAST IS% ADD SHALL OTHERWISE BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26 -SO2 W THE WHEAT RIDGE COPE OF LAWS. O) ARBORIST 5HALL IDENTIFY NON-INVASIVE AND NON-WIISANCE SPECIES OF TREES TO BE RffSE ILEO AND SIGN ANALYSIS 54ALL ACCOMPANY THE SOP WITH THE INTENT TO A HEALTHY AND MATURE GREE CANOPY TO THE EXTENT FEASIBLE SJBJECr TO THE REVIEW AND AFPROVAL OF STAFF AND PLANNING COFMI%10N. PROJECT TEAM OWNER ARCHITECT: JETS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLS THINK TANK 51DDI0, INC. leis SOUTH LAKE ROAD F0 wX lei LAKEWOOD, CO Sent FREDERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MAW JOL5TAD CONTACT: PAlli SQUW p 303-618-6663 ARCHITECT, FI 301 SURVEYOR: ANSI EURVED TNG CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTANTS BOULDER. COLORADO W301 420 Not AVENUE CONTACT: ROBERT L RUBINO PL5 LONGMONT, CO W501 (303) 464-9515 CONTACT JOEL BEAMONB, P£. 303-651-6626 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE Tie Sam slpned W XW,, or ADD dymnatatl @0RDS), TRUST, ac money agree For the property Leede tlesonded hereon vkh be doesmapeM as a Plairned oerebpment It savtlaice Kenn the utas, resMc1'ms and comity s PonWPeU In IN, plea aro a, may O1Penwhe be fapFeU b) 1w. I (vel al rental That tis aEpm21 of a reamlq to law all Deakebpment aN apprtrml of Ins iii pun, does not Oeste a :realed proWSYy right Restore poly fl is my only III and acrns Rimm t to tle artanons of 6m[M 26 121 Wife Meet Edge (otle of Lava (Nark Jdelad - mnw, JM5 Lalm MUNI ITTO DATA ce Cobad ) ) son County ce Jefarwn ) May fordeba g InsMtrent was Wenowle$rytl Word The thin �y N � AD. 20— by WCHUC my hand and oH'c'al Per W rommis ew ayires'. Trans Pnidlc BUCE)ROR'S GERIIRCATE Jon nelebv oeNlfv fret ire v y of AT nderbeemy e JM5 eTakenue on an T LLC wore nam ty ire ATTheUndermytl�tenan Wgi tothebestUke operaableharriWaM thd,In nsandrce call aF(Jmba ra acca etanyl Jan ransetl erpre ee SLIT tie acwmpenNnU Flan accUratey represents s31tl surrey (SLAWAR3 Beat Sensors COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE Strafe of cobretll ) )ss Cannot W JeHamn ) I FerelH ceUHy iret OR pan work Hotel b the oreca U the Connie Earn and Ranrtlar of: Jameson Fairly at Wooden Cof at oCIxY ivk on try �yof AD, In Break Magi Rsepten Uo JEFFERSON COUMY CLERK AND RECORDER Ry EVAR, PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION IRSLTRIdetl for approval He tlav of by COTe Most Edge Plamhg Cossink,. Clelrpvxn CITY CE TIRCAMON Agm,af ink tlav W P lie Most Edi Any Corral ATTEST AD Clerk Meyer Canminity Deas pment D'reWa SHEET INDEX: 011 1 COVER 54EEi OUR 21 LAND USE MAP 00 THINKTANK ■■ a t a a I a esiriac n uRr:EeN(n Real JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO : NEE OTE TRACTS 9, 10, n a P{ NICHOLAS GARDENS, EWA THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE REPO OF D H EXM1YTVG STALE RT ON CONVEYED IN A DEED THE DEFT. RECORDED FEBRUARY M 908 IN BOOK 1999 AT PAGE 380. A PORTION OF THE NOHIHE VO OF SECTION 24 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 9111 PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO n -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT MTS ACRES MORE OR LIM(9932993S SF 4-) SEE NOTE 4 LIT 0 < BUILDING PAD m SEE NOTE 2 Q 0 LE UONNM 6 ��\� \O NG�N O V SEE NOTE 4 Lu 1> PLANNING o AREA 1 co 4.86 ACRES Lu v gU\CD\NG E Q GA Q 1� TRACT ,1A1 1-70 NORTH BUILDING PAD >.ESEE NOTE 7 SEE NOTE 2 OPEN SPACE PARKING U r oQ BUILDING PAD m Q PLANNING < SEE NOTE 2 w AREA 2 crF FF 17.87 ACRES F PARKING WARD POND LAND SUMMARY PLANNING AREA 1 456 ACRES PLANNING AREA 2 I1.91 ACRES TOTAL 517E 22.13 4CRE5 PERMITTED USES ALLOUFF) LLSEs PAT I 00 THINKTANK ■■ s , d i , armuttwe Rwaeael9r. Imeows RESIDENTIAL INCLUDING= P A55157ED LIVING FACILITY P O'LELLING, MULTIPLE P PE95rtTE0 ALJD USES ARE SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWING TABLE. USES NOT u DEEMED EXCLUDED. sTED suALL aE DWELLING, W UE MOVER PaTnok o9TreRa - areniftoOt m3Tc p(pkkMNN3-997 0KIR91 (mbift)309-99T-9948 (maGIM) 303-900A945 PUBLIC, CIVIC AND INSTITO71C INCLUDING: 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PAWING TO BE PERMITTED USES ALLOUFF) LLSEs PAT I PA -2 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDING= P A55157ED LIVING FACILITY P O'LELLING, MULTIPLE P DWELLING, W UE MOVER P PUBLIC, CIVIC AND INSTITO71C INCLUDING: 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PAWING TO BE COMMUNITY BUILDINGS INCLUDING LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P PARKE, OPEN SPACE AND PLAZ4s P P PUBLIC USES AND BUILDIN66 P RECREATION PACITTIRS, INDOOR P P URBAN GARDENS P P UTILITIES, MINOR P COMMERCIAL SERNGES AND RETAIL 6) ORCHES MAY BE F ALIGNED OR EURED AS REQUIRED. ANIMAL DAYCARE P P BANKS AND FINM AL IN57I71170R5 - NO DRI VE THIEL P P BARS, TAVERNS, AND NIGHT CLUBS P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOAT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND TRAILER SALES, RENTALS, <SERVICE LISTED USE, COMPATIBLE IN CHAR46TER AVD IMPACT WITH LESS IN P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P EATING ESTABLISHMENT P P FAST FOOD EATING ESTABLISHMENT - NO DRIVE THRI P P MICRCASSFU£RY, MORODISTLLERT WITH TAP RK)CM P P MIGROBREWERY, MICRODI5TILLERY WITHOUT TAP ROOM P P PIPFCNAL SE OEs P P PHOTOCOPYING AND PRINTING P P PRODUCE STANDS P P RECREATION FACILITIES, COMMERCIAL P P REPAIR RENTAL AND SERMONIC, OF BOATS - OUTDOOR STORAGE P RETAIL SALES UP TO 20000 65F FOR ONE TENAVT SPACE P P URBAN GARDENS P P VETERINARY CLINICS AND HOSPITALS - NO OUTDOOR PENS P P HOSPITALITT AND ENTERTAINMENT ART 57JDI05 AND GALLERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS P STUDIOS, FALLW)NG ART, MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RADIO P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P P ANCILLARY USES PAEn'ING FACILTIEs P P TEMPORARY USES SPECIAL EV 1,75, INCLUDING FESTIVALS AND FARMERS MARKET P P LEGEND: P PERMITTED USE PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT U z 1� Q V 1 z IL w 0 z IL U1 aLd v Y z V PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN O AD 120' SKETCH PLAN O D P GRAPHIC SCALE I' = 60'-O" 2 JOB NUMBER SHEET NOTES. - U EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SIAPUPOT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT - PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'A' ADHERE5 TO - ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO'DECLARAMON OF EASEMENT' - AND ECORDED PLAT. 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PAWING TO BE DETERMINED AT SDP 505MITTAL. _- 3) EMERGENCY SERVICE, INGRESS A EGRESS ONLY. 4) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONNECT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH ORO55 WALK / ACROSS 1-10 FRONT ROAD. 6) ORCHES MAY BE F ALIGNED OR EURED AS REQUIRED. _- l) SLOPE EASEMENT BOJNDARY. 8) THE COMMUNITY DEVELC ENT DIRECTOR HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SEE NOTE 3 11 DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE 50 PERMITTED CR ALLOIIED ON THE 54516 OF rc BEING SIMILAR TO A 1 LISTED USE, COMPATIBLE IN CHAR46TER AVD IMPACT WITH LESS IN THE ZONE DISTRICT, CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT, ANO WHICH WOULD NOT 5E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BY REASON GA5 NOISE RADIATION, HEAT, GLARE, VIBRATION, OF ODOR DUST, FUiME5TION SIT E DGDNDARy , ITRAFFICOR NOT HAZARDOUS Tb HE HEALARRING TH DME5SATPnOF �RROEUNDINOR IG REAS THROUGH DANGER OF FIRE OR EXPLOSION THE D1FCC7OR 5 DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE SOARED OF ADJUSTMENT AS AN INTERRRETATION •�I REQUEST. PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT U z 1� Q V 1 z IL w 0 z IL U1 aLd v Y z V PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN O AD 120' SKETCH PLAN O D P GRAPHIC SCALE I' = 60'-O" 2 JOB NUMBER THINK TANK s t U d i o architecture urban design interiors MEMORANDUM: Record of notification to David Parker — Manager of Swadley Ditch Association Contact: 303-981-5035 • 27 -Feb -20 Initial Mailing—No response • 11 -Mar -20 Certified Mailing— Returned to sender • 17 -Jul -20 Greg Lockridge spoke on the phone with David Parker (the ditch association manager) informing him of city of Wheat Ridge requirements for notification describing our proposed project and location of property and asking him if an email with .pdf attachment would be an acceptable form of contact rather than U.S. mail and hard copy. He indicated that he would prefer an email with attachment. • 17 -Jul -20 Greg Lockridge emailed David Parker at dpinsincPgmail.com with .pdf of JMS Lake ODP sheets attached to that email. In the email we requested a confirmation response and had email notifications on. No response received. • 21 -Jul -20 Follow-up via phone call asking him if he had received the email and if he would be so kind as to respond to my email with a confirmation of receipt. On the phone he indicated he would. No response received. • 3 -Aug -20 Follow-up via phone asking if he would respond to my email with a confirmation of receipt. He indicated that he would. To date I have received nothing from the association. P.O. Box 781, Frederick, Colorado 80530-0781 © 303.997.4948 City of �Wheat.p COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29�Ave. 303.235.2857 August 6, 2020 Patrick Berrend Think Tank Studio PO Box 781 Frederick, CO 80530 Mr. Berrend: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: This letter is in regards to your application for approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A- 2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan. I have reviewed your fourth submittal and have the following comments. Also, refer to the redlined ODP document. General Comments 1. Comment Responses: Please use the provided Word file of this letter to respond to the subsequent comments and provide it as part of the next submittal. ODP Document In preparation for public hearings and the associated scrutiny from decision makers and the public, I requested that a few staff take a final read through. There are a few new comments provided below which will greatly help to improve the clarity and intent of the document. Refer to redlines. Sheet 1 2. In Open Space and Landscaping: a. For Note A, add the following to the end of the sentence for clarity: "...and plat review through approval of civil construction documents and a Subdivision Improvement Agreement." This does not change the previously agreed-upon process, just adds clarity for staff and decision -makers. b. For Note B, remove "provided that" and add the following: "In the event of a natural reduction in pond size (i.e., long-term drought) the area shall be considered as open space. If a reduction in the pond size (natural or manmade) results in a request for increased developable land area from what is depicted on Sheet 2, an amended ODP shall be required to establish development standards, access, and land use concepts for the additional developable area." c. For Note D, add: "...and such analysis shall accompany the SDP with the intent to preserve a healthy and mature tree canopy to the extent feasible subject to the review and approval of staff and the Planning Commission." Alternatively, you can add a tree per square foot ratio with a caliper credit to Note C. 3. In Development Standards: a. For the Outdoor Storage section, add "in PA -2" as shown on redlines. b. For the Standards for Off -Street Vehicle Parking section, you already say parking shall comply with 26-1109. You can combine the sections to state: "All parking and loading www.cimheattidge.co.us shall be in conformance with Section 26-1109 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws, with the following modifications/additions:..." and then insert the rest of the language on the ODP. This will provide clarity and combine the two separate parking sections. 4. In Planning Area 1, the font makes the 70% look like 10%. Change if possible or "cross" the 7. Sheet 2 5. In the Use Chart, bold the main categories "Residential", "Public, Civic, and Institutional", "Commercial Services and Retail", "Hospitality and Entertainment', "Office and Industrial", and "Ancillary." It is still difficult to distinguish these categories from the actual uses. 6. The slope easement will need to be shown on the future subdivision for this site. * Staff did not receive a survey that shows the existing slope easement, so please provide if you have it.* After all of the above comments are resolved, Staff will have no further comments on the ODP and the Planning Commission and City Council hearing dates can be scheduled. En$ineerine comments No additional comments. Additional comments Ditch Companies: Thank you for submitting correspondence with the Wadsworth Ditch Association. The City will need written approval from the Swadley Ditch Association before being able to process an SDP or building permits for this site, but we are able to proceed with the ODP at this time. Specific designs will be reviewed at time of SDP and should be presented to both ditch companies. Colorado Department of Transportation: In your meeting, did CDOT approve the ODP plans as shown? The City needs to confirm in order to write the staff report. Please forward any confirmation from CDOT if you have it, as we have not heard anything from them. This concludes the summary of comments. Please re -submit the ODP as one PDF file. For questions or clarification on any comments, feel free to directly contact me or Jordan Jefferies. Sincerely, Scott Cutler Planner II cc: WZ-19-03 case file Mark Jolstad Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JM8 LAKE HOLDINGS, LLS. MINED -USE DEVELOPMENT 18 TO FESANN (TATE T4I5 FOESLER GROVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES 91JRROIJNDINS A PRIVATE LAKE Anne LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL AND UNIQUE AMENITY EOR THE RESIDENTS AMC PATRONS OF THIS pEVELOPMENT AMC THE GREATER (OMMUNRY. THE HIGHLY VISENE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURING ON THE LACE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRIMARY GATEWA)' ASPECT OF THI5 DEVELOPMENT THE PROJECT F ossfas s TRANSIT SUPPORTIVE IA5E5 AND DEBRIE5 GIVEN THE PROXIMITT TO THE WHEAT RIDGE - "Fee STATION. A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 15 PROPOSED FOR THE DIFFER PLANNING AREA (PAI) WITH RETAIL AMENITIES. THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT ANT, ADPFE55 THE 6LHET AND LOCAL PECESTRIAN COfcRIpORS AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY TORPR VIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE LOWER PENINSULA 51¢ IN PLANNING AREA (PAD 16 PROPOSED TO CONTAIN RETAIL. THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE WATER-FEURT LOCATION AND 51TE V151BIL17Y FROM 1-10 TO SHOLCABE WATER 5POR75. TH15 ACTIVITY NODE WCKI AL50 5ERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY, THE KEY F a%<MITY AND VISIBILITY Or THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARD ROAD, AND WHEAT RIDGE -WART, STATION CORRIDORS WILL Cri A NJIWE LEVEL OF VITALITY ANT, COMMUNITY ST EUFADS THAT WILL BE wRTHER ENHMICED BY THE OVERALL cq-1PLEMENTARr ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WZ-19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC PEVE-CEMENT ELEMENTS SUCH AS 51TE LAYOUT ANP SCOLDING ARCHITECNff HAVE NOT BEEN ACCRE65ET, ON THIS DOCUMENT A6 A RESULT, A SPECIFIC CEVELOFMENT PLAN MOST BE SUBMITTED AND APP6m'ED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE 6U51 OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR BUILDING PEp'llr APPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING 54ALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-1103 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAGS. ALL EXTERIOR Llsarl SHALL BE IN CONFORsol WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WL EAT RIDGE CODE CE LAWS. ALL FENCING SHALL 5E IN CONEOFR ANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAW, ALL SIGNI SHALL SE IN COMFORMIANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. BILL20ARp0 ARE EROHIBNEP, ARCHITECTURAL, SITE, ANT, ETREETSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE IN cON=ORIANCE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AVD SITE DESIGN MANUAL (ASIDE) AND n P/ sLREErSCAFE DESIGN MANUAL. OUTDOOR STORAGE: 5OA75 AND INVENTORY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUMDDS AREAS COMPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION 26-628. STANDARDS FOR OFF-STREET VEHICULAR PARKING, BICYCLE PARKINGAND 26-1109. The first statementabove should LOADING say, "All parking and loading shall be in PAWING FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE COnforrtlan Ce with section 2F1109 of the REAR OR 5IDE OF BUILDINGS, AND STRUCTURED PARKING, 16 ENCWW{CEp, Wheffi Rld eCOde 0f 2w5, Wlltl ltle fe OWln Wl PRACTICAL PAGE STANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY PROVIDE 9 9 SURFACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE DETER'11NED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC mOdlfi Cdfi0n5: Parking for mWfi USe bW ding5 PROPOSED USE BICYCLE PARKING AND VEHICULAR LOADING FORShOWd be OCdted..P (ContlnDe f,0 end Of P465ENGERS AND, AS APFRGPRIATE, MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE PROVIDED section IN CLOSE Fess TTY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY ) 5TRRUDDREs. SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE SHIFPING AND OTHER 51MILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE FRIMARY ENTRANCE, 6TANpARTS5 FOR ACCE650RM" STRICTURES. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED. PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCES..ORY STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED NATTY F£RCENT OF THE FOOTFRINT OCCUPIED BY THE FRIMARr STRICnRE OR STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT LOT. ACCESSORY 601LDNGS SHALL BE COMPRISED OF PORM, M47ERIALS. AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARLHITECTIRI QUALITIES OF THE PRIT BUILDING, OR OF THIRD ARE FROHIBITEp. PLANNING AREA 1 naxlMurl auILDII�G COVERAGE 1 COVER SHEET TQ% &MILD 10 -10 FRp�iKaE ROAD 0 -DP PROM F£IFERTI" LINE 20% MILD r0 WARD ROAD I 0-W NROM FROFERTI" LINE 30% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 120 MIN. GO MAX (6 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 1 COVER SHEET OUR 21 OWNR: E ARCHITECT: MINIMUM SETBACK FROM FROF-£RTY THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A PUBLICLY -ACCESSIBLE MOTI-WE TR41L CONNECTINS TO THE OI6 10' FROM EAST FROPERTY LINE MAXIMUM BITHOIFG HEIGHT JMS LACE HOLDINGS LLS 35' MAX. (3 RTORIEB) TRACTS S. tq tl & P4 MONY S GARDENS, E%CEPT THAT FBI CONVEYED TO THE DEPT OF Al STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 2f, W IN BOOK 999 AT PAGE M A PORRON OF THE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTION A, TOWNSHIP 9 SODTT{ RANGE SS WEST OF THE SM PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 ACRES MONS OR I£SS I GROAQ3B SF IA) WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION 49TH 0 60' 120' 200' SPA and platcivil construction through NITY MAP: approval Of civil a subdivision cti i n This on may GRAPHIC ECAL6 I' _ ]om'-m' inadvertantly make documents and a subdivision it look like 10% improvement agreement. Instead Of TO%. OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING PROJECT TEAM OWNERS CERTIFICATE Tiny mbm slpnai W ns), or k}talry Weduated @jWDW), er thereof, ao leby send That the Penalty egally desontetl hereon Wll be dessmpel as a PIaIYVJ Cerebpment I, savtlance with the utas, exondms and comilms dontared In IN, pleb one er may O1PenMse be Found by law I oval Turner recognize That The approval o1 a reamlq to Clarmd Cevebpment and appeal N Ins Roil mekSnertl Who does not 0adte a :rental grolwrYy night Vestal or Ty Ferns trey only an® and acrns Rim men To the pmvlslme o16m[M 2E-121 W the vrF®t Code Code o1 Lava Mark uWand - cane, JMS Lady Fbltlhgs, LLlJ State N Cobad ) az IXtinty N JeHerwn ) had, pedge d 1nsMnent wind Wenekele Sal Lsbre me,hin sky N � AC. 20— tk Witness my hand and Under seal. W rommissim exams chains Pike SURVEYOR'S CERIIRCATE ooefee cenLLGmmma vat the bounso my at JMS ak feel T LDo Tina nem ey Mre m ureter my earl eln and m g i m ma beet rn hey he Im>Jn+pe, mmreeon am Flet, in acmexv elm all amended, tie acwmpe N110 Flan Washately aboun n6 bad sa,a, (Scrayea5ea) Signakire ) ss Cement ce Defamer ) I hardly sell post OR pan was HOW in the affli ef the (Rana Clink and Ranraa of Jefferson Do imy at Cagan, Novi at bogxk—M on tle �yOf AD, in RUNS Myw�Weepibn The— JEFFERSON WJEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECDRCER Ry DWUTy PLANNING COMMISSION OERTIFIOATION Poex rarst for approval He day Of RCOTe Most All Parma Ccmisa'm. Clelrpvxn CUP CCRDRCA00N AIRm,af the dine d by Te Meet Edge Cm Chancel ATTET AD Clerk Meyer Canmunity Devedpment DNAXz- SHEET INDEX: ODP1 1 COVER SHEET OUR 21 OWNR: E ARCHITECT: A) THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A PUBLICLY -ACCESSIBLE MOTI-WE TR41L CONNECTINS TO THE OI6 LINEAR PARIS JMS LACE HOLDINGS LLS THINK TANK BIDDIO, IVO, NORTH OF THE 1-10 FRONTAGE ROAD. THE FNAL LOCATION, DESIGN, MND MAINTENANCE IGATICNS SHALL BE SOUTH LAKE PEX l81 DETIFFAMIKED AT TIME OF .,'dr r.,_m. -- --- - ----- LAKEWOOD,lei Fel PR 80530 FREDERICK CONTACT: MARK JOLbTAD CONTACTCO JOL5 T CONTACT: PFl BERRENp B) THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A PONT, THAT IS NO LESS THAN FIVE ACES IN SIZE, WHICH MAY ALSO SERVE ASA 303-618-6663 ARCHITECT, NOARB ASA FACILITY FOR THE N €3 THE MINIMUM SURFACE AREA 303-960-9925 E ADJWATER TO ACCOUNT HAY BE ADJUSTED r0 AMBIENT RO DWATE POR CHANGES N AMBIENT GROIMDWATER LEVELS 02 CHANGES THE SITE IN THE slrE's ENDAM EXEMPTION FROM AIIGnEMar1ON UNDER STATE WATER POTION RUBINO SURVEYING RM51W SWF CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTANTS C) 00VERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN PA -I NEAP BE AT LEAST 15% AND SHALL BOULDER. 80301 420 420 21st AVENUE OTHERWISE ID E CO OTHERWISE BE IN CCMg31ANCE WITH RECTION 26-502 THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, CONTACT: ROBERT J. RIIBINO PL5 ROGERJ, F LONGMONr, CO 00501 (909) 464-9515 SgJOEL BEAMONB, P£. p) BO91 SHALL IOENIIFY NO-INVARI ARRI NVE AND NON-W119ANCE SPECIES W TREES f,0 BE PRE9ERVEp. 303-651--651- 6626 Insert between B and C or add to the end of B'. In the event ofa natural reduction in pond size (ie., long- ongterra termdrought) the area shall be considered as open space and such analysis shall accompany the SDP with the intent preserve a Ufa reduction in the pond size (natural or manmade) results health y and m ature tree canopy to the extent feasible subject to the review in a request for increased developable land area sheet 2, and appreval of staff and the Planning Commission. an amended CDP shall be required to establish development standards, access and land use concepts for (Alternatively, you can add a tree per square foot ratio with a call per credit the additional developable area to note A OWNERS CERTIFICATE Tiny mbm slpnai W ns), or k}talry Weduated @jWDW), er thereof, ao leby send That the Penalty egally desontetl hereon Wll be dessmpel as a PIaIYVJ Cerebpment I, savtlance with the utas, exondms and comilms dontared In IN, pleb one er may O1PenMse be Found by law I oval Turner recognize That The approval o1 a reamlq to Clarmd Cevebpment and appeal N Ins Roil mekSnertl Who does not 0adte a :rental grolwrYy night Vestal or Ty Ferns trey only an® and acrns Rim men To the pmvlslme o16m[M 2E-121 W the vrF®t Code Code o1 Lava Mark uWand - cane, JMS Lady Fbltlhgs, LLlJ State N Cobad ) az IXtinty N JeHerwn ) had, pedge d 1nsMnent wind Wenekele Sal Lsbre me,hin sky N � AC. 20— tk Witness my hand and Under seal. W rommissim exams chains Pike SURVEYOR'S CERIIRCATE ooefee cenLLGmmma vat the bounso my at JMS ak feel T LDo Tina nem ey Mre m ureter my earl eln and m g i m ma beet rn hey he Im>Jn+pe, mmreeon am Flet, in acmexv elm all amended, tie acwmpe N110 Flan Washately aboun n6 bad sa,a, (Scrayea5ea) Signakire ) ss Cement ce Defamer ) I hardly sell post OR pan was HOW in the affli ef the (Rana Clink and Ranraa of Jefferson Do imy at Cagan, Novi at bogxk—M on tle �yOf AD, in RUNS Myw�Weepibn The— JEFFERSON WJEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECDRCER Ry DWUTy PLANNING COMMISSION OERTIFIOATION Poex rarst for approval He day Of RCOTe Most All Parma Ccmisa'm. Clelrpvxn CUP CCRDRCA00N AIRm,af the dine d by Te Meet Edge Cm Chancel ATTET AD Clerk Meyer Canmunity Devedpment DNAXz- SHEET INDEX: ODP1 1 COVER SHEET OUR 21 LAND USE MAP 00 THINKTANK ■■ a e a a I a amaXeiWre uRr:EM(n Mmes Batrlck pertvitl - Sunn c( Were RatMAcethinkteniumu lomat (Pham) 3019-9W-4948 W ikl 9]R-%0.9925 Age d IL F F0 L- U Z 0 U uu 0 � � pit ND C —/ W Q� Q W Lu Lu ::� raw arse'. PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ODP 1 JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS & A n 6 2 NCHOIPB BORDERS, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HICHl STATE OF CIXARADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1M IN BOOK 999 AT PAGE N& A PORTON OF THE NORTHEPBT V4 OF SEDDON A, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUL RANGE fig WEST OF THE BM PM COUNTY OF JEFFERSON.STATE OF COLORADO -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT COMNNING RUM ACRES MORE OR LESS 199]/'4338 SF♦/-) SEE NOTE 4 0 o BUILDING PAD Lu �m SEE NOTE U o PLANNING AREA 1 w UCN�M O 64.86 ACRES KENC SEE NO�� gU��O�NO E SEE NOTE 3 BUILDING PAD SEE NOTE G 1-70 FRof ONTAGE ROAD NO SEE NOTE 7 OPEN SPACE e OPEN S� S PARKING * SEE 9 NOTE 1 I BUILDING PAD PLANNING Q SEE NOTE AREA 2 17.87 ACRES PA�KIN� WARD POND SIT'SOUND "OlARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT SEE NOTE 4 Bold PLANNINES AREA 1 O Bold 11 S1 ACRES SKETCH PLAN ASSISTED LIVING FADU-17Y P DWELLING, MULTIPLE P GRAPHIC SCALE I' = 60'-0' P SEE NOTE 4 Bold LAND SUMMARY PLANNINES AREA 1 426 ACRES Bold 11 S1 ACRES TOTAL SITE 0 Q ASSISTED LIVING FADU-17Y P DWELLING, MULTIPLE P L Bold P Fu6LIC, CIVIC AND MSTITTIONAL INCLUDING: �Bold CP UWTY BuILDINLS INCLUDING LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P cn P LAND SUMMARY PLANNINES AREA 1 426 ACRES PLANNING AMA 2 11 S1 ACRES TOTAL SITE 22 13 ACRES PERMITTED AND USES ARE SHOJM M THE FOLLOWING TABLE. USES NOt LISTED SHALL BE DEEMED EXCLUDED. PERMITTED USES ALLOEED USE5 PA -I PA-: ,RESIDENTIAL INCTUPT S: P ASSISTED LIVING FADU-17Y P DWELLING, MULTIPLE P DWELLING. LIVE / JORK P Fu6LIC, CIVIC AND MSTITTIONAL INCLUDING: CP UWTY BuILDINLS INCLUDING LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND PLAZAS P P PUBLIC USES AND BWLDI1,65 P FEDERATION[ PACILITES. INDOOR P P URBAN GARDENS P P UTILITIES, MINOR P 0011ERCIAL SERVICES MID RETAIL ANIMAL DAYCARE P P SAN" AND FINANCIAL M5TINTONS - NO DRIVE THRI P P BARS, TAVERNS, AND NIGHT CLUBS P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOAT RECREA7ICNAL VEHICLE AND TRAILER SALES, RENTALS, 4 SERVICE P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P RATING ESTABLISHMENT P P FAST FWD EATING ESTABLISHMENT - NO DRIVE 1YRI P P MICROBREW£RY, FIICRODISTILLERY WITH TAP RCg9 P P MICRDBRELLERY, MICRODISTILLERY WITHOUT TAP ROOM P P PERSONAL SERVICES P P PHOTCCOPYING ANO, PRINTING P P ERODUCE 5TAND5 P P RECREATION FACILITES, COMMERCIAL P P REPAIR RENTAL AND SERVICING OF BOATS - OUTDOOR 5TOR43E P RETAIL SALES UP TO 20000 GSE FOR ONE TENANT SPACE P P URBAN GARDENS P P VETERINARY CLINICS AND H05PI7A-5 - NO OUMOOR PENS P P H05PI7ALI7Y AND ENTERTAINMENT ART $TUC 105 AND GALLERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS P STEP 105, INCLUDING ARC MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RAD 10 P P THEATERS P P OFFICE MID INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P P ANCILLARY LEES PARKING FACILITIES P P TEMPORARY USES SPECI4 EVENTS, INCLUDING FESTIVALS AND PARTNERS MARKET P P LEGEND: P PERMITTED USE SHEET N07E5: N 74875IFN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY rRAVER5E5 ADJACENT PROPERTY 7419 DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE 7PVC7 'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS RUNTES REFER TO'DECLARATICN OF EASEMENT" AND RECORDED PLAT, 2) PROPOSED DRVE AISLES SIDEWALK$ LANDSCAPING, PARTING TO BE DETEFVWAED AT SDP SUEN177AL. 3) EMERGENCY SERVILE, IFGRff% / FGRE% ONLY. 4) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONNEC7 TO LINEAR PARK BY CITY) WITH CROSS WALK ACROSS 1-70 FRONT ROAD, 5) DITCHES MAY BE ME ALIGNED OR BURIED AS RffL UIEFT) v SLOPE EASEMENt BOUNDARY. 5) THE COMMUNITY DEVELOF11ENT DIRECTOR 4A5 THE AU7-ORITY TO DETEWIRS THAT A u5E NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE SO PERMITTED OR ALLOWED ON THE BASIS OF IT BEIFG SNILAR 70 A LISTED USE, Cp9PA7IBLE IN CHAR4C7ER AND PIRACY WITH USES IN THE ZONE DISTRICT, CONSISTENT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH UOALD NOT BE OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BY REA50N R�ICQR DUST GENERGRT)IOMrISF'AFREZ NEEDS, 011GAS NCISS D R STOHEAT GRA(EEOR UUSE FIOU OR 5 NOT HAZARDOUS 70 THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF 5URROUNDIFG AREAS THROUGH CANCER! � ARE OR EX9-0610N. THE DIRECTORS DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT AS AN INfrFEFETATIOJ REQUEST, 00 THINKTANK ONI a :, d 1 o amM=w,e 'ros v ~m CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC. MIXED -LIFE DEVELOPMENT IS TO REHABILITATE T4I5 FOESLER GROVEL MINE 51TE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SURROUNDING A PRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL Anne UNIQUE AMENITY EOR THE RESIDENTS ANO PATRONS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT ANO THE GREATER (OMMUDITY THE HIGHLY VISENE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURRING ON THE LACE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRIMARY Geyli ASPECT OF THI5 DEVELOPMENT THE PROJECT FROBECE S TRANSIT 5UEPORTIVE USES AND DENSITIES GIVEN THE PROXIMITY TO THE WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION, A REBIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 15 PROPOSED FOR THE UPFER PLANNING AREA (PAI) WITH RETAIL AMENITIES. THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT ALJp ADDRESS THE SUET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN CORRIpOR5 AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY TORPROc VIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE LOWER PENINSULA 51¢ IN PLANNING AREA (PAD 16 FROPOSED TO CONTAIN RETAIL. THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE WATER-FRIINT LOCATION AND 51TE V151BIL17Y FROM 1-10 TO S CUCASE WATER SPORTS. TH15 ACTT VItt NODE WCKI AL50 5ERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY, THE KEY FROXIMITY AND VISBILITY Or THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARP ROAD, AND WHEAT RIDGE -WARD STATION CORRIDORS WILL Cell A DUQUE LEVEL OE VITALITY AMR COMMUNITY STNER'iY THAT WILL BE FURTHER FANVOED BY THE OVERALL CQMPLEHENTARY ARCHTECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WZ-19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC PEVELOPr¢NT ELEMENTS SUCH AS 51TE LArOUT ADD BJILDING ARCHITECnff HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT. A5 A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MOST BE SUBMITTED AND APP6m'ED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE 6.15 TIAL OF A RIGHT -OE -WAY OR BUILDING F£R011T AFPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING 5 -ALL BE IN CONFORMAVC£ WITH SECTION 36-1103 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAW. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE LLHEAT RIDGE CODE CE LAWS. ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 O THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, RLL BIGNI SHALL SE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. BILLE30ABI ARE FROHOUTEP, ARCHITEclu¢AL, SITE, AW, ETREETSCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE M CONEOWANCE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL (RARE) AND SLREETSCAFE DESIGN MANUAL. OUTDOOR STORM 5OA75 AND INVENFORY ARE 70 BE DISPLAYED IN OU'DOOR AREAS COMPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION 26-628. STANDARDS FOR O F-57REET VEHICULAR PARKING, BICYCLE PARKING, AND LOADING PARKING OR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE EAR OR 51DE Gir BUILDINGS, AND STRJCNffD PARKING, IS ENCWRAGED. WHERE PRACTICAL PERE STANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE DETEOMINED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC FRGPOSED USE. BIOYCLE PARAINa AND v7NOTLAR LOADING FOR PASSENGERS AND, AS APPROPRIATE, MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE fere) TTY TO THE PRIMARY ENTR4NCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRUCTURES. SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE 5HIPPING AND OTHER 51MILAR FUNCTIONS BHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE FRIMARY ENTRANCE. STAN )i FOR ACCESSORi" STRUCTURES. ACCESSORY St21cTURES SHALL BE ALLOWED PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSi STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED N£MY F£RCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE FRMARr STRUCnRE OR STRUCTURES ON THE Skiii T LOT. ACCESSORY BULLDMGS SHALL BE CCMFE ED OF FORM, MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARCHITECRW AL QUALITIES OF THE PRIMART BUILDING, DRIVE THIRD ARE FROHIBITEp. PLANNING AREA 1 naxlMurl BUILDING COVERAGE MAP: 10% &IILD 10-10 FRpIiKaE ROAD 0-20' FROIM F£IFERTI" LINE 20% BUILD TO WARD ROAD I m W FROM F ADEE S"t LINE 30% MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 120 MIN. GO MAX (6 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 MAP: 0 60' 120' =A-A 200' Fa) BOX lei MINIMUM SETBACK FROM FROF-ERTY FREDERICK CO 80530 10' FROM EAST FROPERTY LINE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT Gers,PH 35' MAX. s 5TORIES) MIMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS S. tq n & le NICHOLAS GARDENS, IRGEPT THAT TORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEBT OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY M W IN BOOK 999 AT PAGE M A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST VL OF SECTION A, TOWNSHIP 9 Wert RANGE SS WEST OF THE SM PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 ACRES MONS OR LESS (86]$iS3B SF IA) WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION W 49TH STREET F W W 2 H N w O Z O 0 Q CDZ Q WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA O Q Q >Q VICINITY ARCHITECT: MAP: 0 60' 120' =A-A 200' Fa) BOX lei LAKEWOOD, CO Wnel FREDERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MAW JOL5TAD CONTACT: PATRIOC es]r Es D Gers,PH I- � ,mm -0. OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING A) THE SITE WALL INCLUDE A PUBLICLY -ACCESSIBLE MULTI -LOSE TRAIL CONNECTING TO THE ORT'6 LINEAR PARIS NORTH OF THE 1-10 FRONTAGE ROAD. THE FINAL LOCATION, DESIGN, AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS WALL BE DETHEATIR O AT TIME OF Si THROJCSH APPROVAL W CIVIL CONSTRICTION DOCUMENTS. B) THE SITE WALL INCLUDE A POND THAT I6 NO LESS THAN F1 VE ACES M SIZE, Win MAY ALSO Ser" AS A AS A STO3MWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT; F%IVIDED THAT THE MINIMUM SURFACE AREA MAY BE ADJUSTED TO ACCOUNT FOR CHANGES M AMBIENT GROUNDWATER LEVELS OR CHANGES M THE SITE'S EXEMPTION FROM AI D ENTARM UNDER STATE WATER POLICY C) LANDSCAPE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN PA -1 AND PA -2 WALL BE AT LEAST 15% AND 5 -mal OTHERWISE BE IN COE05abl CE WITH SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, P) ARBORIST 54ALL IOSCHAT NON-INVASIVE AND NON-1,115ANCE SPECIES W TREES TO SE PRESERVES. PROJECT TEAM OWNER ARCHITECT: DES LAKE HOLDINGS, LLS THINK TANK STUDIO, IND. leis SOUTH LAKE ROAD Fa) BOX lei LAKEWOOD, CO Wnel FREDERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MAW JOL5TAD CONTACT: PATRIOC es]r Es D 303-618-6663 ARCHITECT Ni 303-960-9925 SURVEYOR: RBaMW SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AIRPORT ROAD RO.:KY RIDGE COJSJLTANTS BOULDER. COLORADO 80301 420 Not AVENUE CONTACT: ROBERT L RllBINO PL5 LCNGMONT CO 80501 (303) 464-9515 OOJTACT JOEL BEAMONB, P£. 303-651-6626 OWNERS CERTIFICATE Tiny Sam slened W XW,, an ADD dymnated @09nbs), TRUST, ac lately agree For the prepare, Leede desonded hereon vkh be doesm ped as a Plalrned DVAbpment IN aavtlaMe Kenn the utas, iesMcl'ms and comity s donWPetl In IN, plea aro a, may offenr se be fapned b) 1w. I (vel al rental That He aTpm21 of a reamlq to law all Deakebpment aid app al of Ins iii magnern pan does not Rete a :rested ameshy right Vestay pity fli my only an® and acrns Rimm t to tle artanons of 6m[lm 26 121 W Fe Meet Edge (Ads of Lava (Nark Jdelad - o'nmx, JMS Lelm Fbltlhgs, LL[J Snake ce Cobad ) ) ria County ce Jefarwn ) May fardeba g InsMkrent was Wenowle$rytl Word The thin �y N � AD. 20— by Witness my hand and oH'c'al seal. W rommissiw depres'. Trans Pndlc SOVEVOR'S GER ITCATE ua nelebv oeNlfv C m [rev y of AT nderbeemy o1 JMS Lamm on an T LLC was Me ty ire auMerie tl�tanan Wgi tothebestUke Imarukay<le, haat W and thd, In nsandrse wth all aTp'mba rabmN etanyl Jan asnnaetl erpialre as SLIT tle acwmpenNnO Flan accuratey represents saltl surrey (SLAWRA Beat 6k]natre COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDEFS CERTIFICATE Strafe of Opbmtla ) ) ss Cannot of JeRason ) I MerelH sell trek OR pan was eko b the oreca ef the ante Earn and Racookr of Jefferson Ginty at Wooden, Cofmtlq at oCIxY ivk on ire �yof AD, In Break Magi Rsepten Try— JEFFERSON WJEFFERSON COUMY CLERK AND RECORDER By EVAR, PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION IRacmeMed for approval He tlav of R Wry Most Edge Plamhg Cossink,. Clelrpvxn CITY CERIIRCAMON Aq.om ova _tlav of by lie Most Edi Any allld. ATTEST Ory Clerk Meyer Canm into Deredpment D'reaMa SHEET INDEX: 011 1 COVER SHEET OUR 21 Leal USE MAP 00 THINKTANK ■■ a t a a I a asiWaaWre uRr:EeN(n Real JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT SEE AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO e NOTE TRACTS STATE n 6 EO MGNOWB DEED RE DICEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HICNFEBR ATY 21 OF CIXAOOK IN A DEED RCu^4`HGEO FEBRUARY 21, THE O BOOK1399 V4 AT PAGEOR OPNSHIP OF THE RANGE ES OF SECTOR M A, TOWNSHIP3 FJEFFDMME fig WEST COLORADO THE PM GOUN�INGR OFCRES ORESTATE S IDQSW -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT CQMAINING 2ZTl ACRES MUNE DP U=55(B'489B fiF/ - ) SEE NOTE 4 SEE NOTE 4 1-70 BEE,OTE 1) ffACT "A" LLI < BUILDING PAD w BUILDING PAD =SEE NOTE 7 � O 0 ?PLANNING OPEN SPACE Q o SEE NOTE O N o AREA 1 SEE NOTE Q �3: cn 4.86 ACRES gpg IAgO ��oN`� w O JU OPg 6 w ggKE ,oM' CON gg N U gUA OANO `•" OPEN SP PGg gE 00 �PgOVEI Rg OgGK FY .w•• ...o•` 111 COPEUOPU P L1 0 mm�mnnnow ggAvg G C�g0��.�n 111111`` gU\ 0\NO PARS\N ggp G P..........1I I11111I111111 w P gJ PARKING 11 11 1111 P Y �� EEE.EEE.EEE.EEEEEpE�EE.EEE �� C` C, C� AQP BUILDING PAD m Q g�P� OPCS PLANNING < SEE NOTE 2 w AREA 2 cn 17.87 ACRES PARKING WARD POND SEE NOTE 3 ) } SIT'SOUND "NIARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT LAND SUMMARY PLANNINS AREA 1 O PLANNING AMA 2 SKETCH PLAN 22 13 ACRES ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P DWELLING, MULTIPLE P GRAPHIC SCALE: I' = 60'-0' LAND SUMMARY PLANNINS AREA 1 426 ACRES PLANNING AMA 2 1197 ACRES TOTAL SITE 22 13 ACRES DEEMED EXCWDEO S ARE SHOJM N THE POLLOWING TABLE. USES NOT LISTED SHALL BE PERMITTED USES ALLOWED UtE5 PA -I PA-: RESIDENTIAL INCTUDII a: P ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P DWELLING, MULTIPLE P DWELLING. LIVE / WORK P PUBLIC, CIVIC AND NSTITTIONAL INCLUDING: CP UNITY BUILDINLS INCLUDING LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P PARKA, OPEN SPACE AND PLAZAS P P PUBLIC USES AND BWLDI1,65 P FEDERATION[ FACILITES. INDOOR P P URBAN GARDENS P P UTILITIES, MINOR P C011ERCIAL SERVICES AND RETAIL ANIMAL DAYCARE P P SAN" AVT) FINANCIAL NSTINTONS - NO DRIVE THRJ P P BARS, TAVERNS, AND NIGHT CLUBS P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOAT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND TRAILER SALES, RENTALS, 1 SERVICE P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P RATING, ESTABLISHMENT P P FAST FWD EATING ESTABLI54MENT - ND DRIVE THpI P P MICROBREW£RY, MIC ODISTILLERY WITH TAP RCg9 P P MICRDBRELLERY, MICRODISTILLERY WITHOUT TAP SOON P P PERSONAL SERVICES P P PHOTOCOPYING AND PRIMING P P FRODUCE 5TAND5 F P RECREATION FACILITES, COMMERCIAL P P REPAIR RENTAL AND SERVICING OF BOATS - OUTDOOR 5TOR46E P RETAIL SALES UP TO 20000 GSE FOR ONE TENANT SPACE P P URBAN GARDENS P P VETERINARY CLINICS AND HOSPITALS - NO OUMOOR PENS P P HOSPITALITY AND ENTERTAINMENT ART $TUC 105 AND GALLERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS P SnD1o5, INCLUDING ARC MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RAP 10 P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDU57RI,1L MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P P ANCILLARY USES PARKING FACILITES P P TEMPORARY USES SPECI4 EVENTS, NCLUDING FESTIVALS AND PARTNERS MARKET P P LEGEND: P FERII'7ED USE SHEET NOTES: N EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY rRAVER5E5 ADJACENT PROPERTY 7419 DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT 'AADHER£5 TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO'DECLARATCN OF EASEMENT" AND RECORDED PLAT, 2) PROPOSED DRVP AISLES SIDEWALK$ LANDSCAPING, PARTING TO 5E DETER NED AT SDP SUEMI77AL. 3) EMERGENCY SERVICE, EGRESS / EGRESS ONLY. 4) V THOLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONNEC7 TO LINEAR PARK BY CIN) WITH CROSS WALK ACROSS 1-10 FRONT ROAD, 5) DITCHES MAY BE ME ALIGNED OR BURIED AS RffQUIRED. 1) SLOPE EASEMENT BOUNDARY. 5) THE COMMUNITY DEVELOF11ENT DIRECTOR HA5 THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE SO PER1I7TED OR ALLOWED ON THE 54515 OF IT BEIFG SNILAR 70 A LISTED USE, Cp9PA7I5LE IN CHARACTER AND YPACT WITH USES IN THE ZONE DISTRICT, CGNSISfrNT WITH THE INTENT OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH LLGJLD NOT BE OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BY REA50N 1 RICOR DUST C£NER6R1)IOMNSF'ARNG NEEDS, QUIGAS ROSS D R STOHEAT GRAGEEOR UUSE TOW OR 5 NOT HAZ4RDOU5 70 THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF 5URR0JNDIFG AREAS THROUGH QA R � FIRE OR EXR0610N. THE DIRECTORS DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJWSTMMKT AS AN INfrRFRETATION REQUEST. :: THINKTANK e amM=wre 'ros v ~m City of Wheatjdge COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. June 17, 2020 Patrick Berrend Think Tank Studio PO Box 781 Frederick, CO 80530 Mr. Berrend: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 This letter is in regards to your application for approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A- 2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan. I have reviewed your third submittal and have the following comments. Please also refer to the redlined copies of the draft documents and the Engineering letter. General Comments 1. Comment Responses: Please use the provided Word file of this letter to respond to the subsequent comments and provide it as part of the next submittal. Some comments require detailed responses. ODP Document Sheet 1 2. In Character of Development, remove "Street" after "Ward." 3. In the Planning Area 1 chart, the build -to percentages seem low, especially when compared to the proposed building footprint shown on Sheet 2. The build -to areas would only apply to the platted PA -1, so should be increased. The graphic on Sheet 2 shows over 50% build -to for each frontage, but 50% for the I-70 Frontage Road and 30% for Ward Rd may be appropriate given those reflect the MU -C TOD requirements. Are the slopes a consideration? Are there more detailed proposed building footprints that are driving the minimum percentages you've proposed? 4. In the Open Space and Landscaping section: a. The language proposed regarding the trail is inappropriate for the ODP and must be removed, only to include the following in italics: The site shall include a publicly - accessible multi -use trail connecting to the City's linear park north of the I-70Frontage Road. The final location, design, and maintenance obligations shall be determined at time of SDP through approval of Civil Construction documents. i. As discussed previously, the inclusion of the trail is vital to the City's recommendation of approval on the rezoning. We understand grading and final design may alter the location and access points as shown on Sheet 2, but this is true for all types of development, and can be determined at time of SDP when PA -1 and/or PA -2 is developed. ii. The statement regarding liability is also inappropriate for the ODP and can be determined at time of SDP or plat, including through a platted public access easement. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) will tie the construction www.cimheattidge.co.us of the trail to one of the developments, likely PA -1 since it more closely borders that proposed development. There are numerous examples of publicly -accessible amenities (including trails and sidewalks) on private property and by water in the City and metro area; and easements, the SIA, development covenants, and maintenance agreements can be set up to determine liability and long-term maintenance. The type of statement you included is never included in ODPs or site plans, and implies a lack of commitment to City Council. b. The proposed minimum area of 2 acres for the pond is substantially smaller than the current area (we estimate 12-13 acres), and a reduction of that scale would drastically alter the site and affect the traffic study. Either propose a larger minimum size for the pond, or include a graphic (Sheet 3) that would show how PA -2 would be developed if the pond was reduced in size as a separate development scenario, understanding that this is a vastly different request than the ODP currently shows. The City cannot recommend a rezoning at this time that reduces the area this drastically, without a more detailed understanding of what that scenario would look like, and how it would provide recreational amenities as discussed in the Character of Development. Subsequent proposals to reduce the size of the pond would require a new rezoning application from the property owner. Remove all additional language except for the sentence regarding minimum area, and the pond serving as stormwater management for the development: The site shall include a pond that is no less than XX acres in size, which may also serve as a stormwater management facility for the development. c. For item D, change "will" to "shall." As the City does not define "nuisance species", please clarify. Sheet 2 5. In the Use Chart: a. Remove all gaps between categories in Commercial Services and Retail, as previously requested. Bold the main categories. Refer to redlines. b. Remove NP from the legend. The blanks you show on the chart mean not permitted. 6. Is the slope easement boundary existing or proposed? Why is a slope easement required? Does it run from that boundary north to the frontage road? 7. Add "and recorded plat" to Note #1. EnLineerine comments See attached letter from Jordan Jefferies, dated June 16, 2020. A stamped copy of the approved Traffic Impact Study is also provided. Additional comments Ditch Companies: Please reach out to the ditch companies if you haven't already regarding this land use application. While specific designs can be handled at the time of SDP, they should be made aware of the ODP application and provide any preliminary comments prior to public hearings. Provide proof of correspondence with these companies. Colorado Department of Transportation: Please contact CDOT directly regarding access onto Ward Road, access permits, potential roadway improvements, and their requirements for traffic studies. Working with CDOT as soon as possible is crucial to the success of the project. We understand there Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP are potential modifications to the interchange to the southwest of the site, which may have minor impacts on final site design and public improvements in that area. This concludes the summary of comments. Please re -submit the ODP as one PDF file. For questions or clarification on any comments, feel free to directly contact me or Jordan Jefferies. Sincerely, Scott Cutler Planner II cc: WZ-19-03 case file Mark Jolstad Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP City of Wheatljc PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO: Scott Cutler, Planner FROM: Jordan Jefferies, PE DATE: June 16, 2020 SUBJECT: WZ-19-03 / JMS Lake Holdings ODP I have completed Engineering review of the third submittal, received on June 3, 2020, of the JMS Lake Holdings planned mixed use development located at the southeast comer of the westbound I-70 Frontage Rd and Ward Rd and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Outline Development Plan: All Engineering comments have been adequately addressed. Engineering has no additional comments. Traffic Impact Study: All Engineering comments have been addressed and/or clarified. The TIS is hereby approved. **NOTE**: Please be sure all survey work and platting is performed on the City Datum. It is critical to ensure that the surveyor is aware of the datum requirements prior to initiating survey data collection. A Datum Conversion information sheet is provided with these comments to instruct the surveyor on how to ensure the data is collected in accordance with City requirements. FUTURE REQUIREMENTS (Specific Development Phase): CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater thin one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, ROW Construction, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Ward Road Pond ODP_R—ew-3 letter doc: Public Works Engineering June 16, 2020 Page 2 Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. 2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement: Prior to the issuance of any Building, Sitework, or Right -of -Way Construction Permits or the commencement of any construction activities, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) shall be executed by the project owner/developer. The project owner/developer will need to contact the Dept. of Community Development at 303.235.2846 to obtain a copy of the SIA template. Please note that an approved engineer's itemized cost estimate for the public improvements will be included in the SIA (refer to Other Requirement #3 below). SIAs are recorded at the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office with the Final Plat. 3. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee: Upon acceptance of the Itemized Engineer's Cost Estimate, an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (ILOC) in the amount of reflecting the total amount of the approved cost estimate plus 25% (125% of the total estimate) shall be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval at the time of SIA submittal. The total amount required for the Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be determined upon approval of the cost estimate. The ILOC shall remain in force for the entire duration of the project, and the City reserves the right to request the ILOC be renewed if deemed necessary. A photocopy of both the itemized cost estimate and ILOC will be attached to the SIA and recorded at the county. 4. Private improvements Cost Estimate & Use Tax: A cost estimate for private infrastructure improvements will be required prior to issuance of a Sitework Permit. The private improvements cost estimate shall include a breakdown of costs for all non-public "horizontal" infrastructure installed on site, including but not limited to: paving, curb & gutter, sidewalks, sanitary sewer, water mains, hydrants, lighting, private storm sewer improvements, and landscaping. Costs associated with "vertical" construction and public infrastructure should not be included. The private improvements cost estimate will be used to determine the City use tax due for this project. City use tax is due upon application for a Sitework Permit. 2 -Year Warranty Period and Guarantee for Public Improvements Upon completion of all public improvements and Final Acceptance has been granted by the City Inspector, the original Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be surrendered. At that time a 2 -year warranty period for the completed and approved public improvements shall commence. If at any time during said 2 -year Warranty Period the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Developer shall complete such work upon request. Upon commencement of the 2 -year Warranty Period, a 2nd Letter of Credit in the amount of 25% of the original itemized engineer's cost estimate shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge and be dated as to expire on the 2 -year anniversary of the Warranty Period commencement date. The City shall retain said Ward Road Pond ODP Review -3 lettendoc Public Works Engineering June 16, 2020 Page 3 Letter of Credit for the entire 2 -year Warranty Period. Upon completion of the 2 -year Warranty Period, the 2nd Letter of Credit shall be surrendered by the City of Wheat Ridge. 6. Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing: a. ROW Permits. Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way (ROW), the necessary Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right -of -Way Construction Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan (if applicable), Construction Control Plan and easement or ROW dedications b. Licensing. All work within the public Right -of -Way shall only be performed by a municipally -licensed contractor. 7. Sitework Permit: Prior to construction of any private infrastructure on the site, a Sitework Permit will need to be obtained from the City Building Department. Payment of the City use tax is required at the time of application for the Sitework Permit. Sitework Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study (if applicable), Construction Plans, and Construction Control Plan. 8. Construction Control Plan: A Construction Control Plan (CCP) shall be required prior to issuance of Sitework and ROW Permits. The Construction Control Plan is a modified set of construction plans used in the field to facilitate recordation of key as -built elevations and dimensions. The CCP shall be developed by the design engineer and architect and shall be submitted to the City for review and final approval. Instructions for development of the CCP are included with this letter. 9. Pre -Construction Meeting: Prior to commencement of any construction activities the contractor shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with the city of Wheat Ridge public works at 303.235.2861. The contractor shall be responsible for contacting all applicable utility districts for this meeting. 10. Drainage Certification/ As -Built Plans/ SMA and O & M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancv for the subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer -of -Record shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter (DCL) stating that the overall site grading was completed per the approved Grading and Drainage Plans, all Ward Road Pond ODP Review -3 lettendoc Public Works Engineering June 16, 2020 Page 4 drainage facilities were constructed per the approved construction plans and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The DCL shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As -Built Plans on the Current City Datum for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. b. As -Built Plans: The following items shall be included in the As -Built Plan prior to City acceptance: i. Storm Sewer (this info referenced in DCL) 1. Detention/WQ pond volume (sufficient spot elevations for engineer to calculate the volume). 2. Detention/WQ pond Outlet Structure elevations. 3. Manholes, rim and invert elevations. 4. Drop Inlets, grate and invert elevations ii. Lighting within Public ROW only) 1. Streetlight locations. 2. Pedestrian light locations. 3. Pull Box locations. 4. Electric meter location(s) Three (3) copies of the "As -Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: i. One (1) hardcopy is to be signed & sealed on 24" X 36" bond paper, and ii. Two (2) electronic files are to be delivered on DVD/CD-ROM as follows: 1. One (1) file in AutoCAD 2015 DWG or older format, AND 2. One (1) file in PDF format (of the signed & sealed sheets). 11. Information pertaining to the Public Works development requirements, Site Drainage Requirements, the City's Street Construction Standards & Details in AmoCADO DWG format, ROW maps, and City -based coordinate and land surveying information (i.e., Current City Datum), is all available on the Public Works, Development Review page of the City of Wheat Ridge website at: www.ci.wheatridee.co.us Ward Road Pond ODP Review -3 lettendoc CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IS TO REHABILITATE THIS POWER GRAVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERSIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SIIRROWJDING AFRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL AND UVOME A`TNITY FOR THE RESIDENTS AND PATRONS OF THIS DEVELOPHENT AND THE GREATER CCMhNNITY. THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURIFAG ON THE LANE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE'FRIMART GATEWAY' A51 ECT OF THIS DEVELO`mENT. THE PROJECT FStoass 8 TRANSIT 5UR'GRTIVE USES AND DENSITIES GIVEN THE PROXIMITY TO THE WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION, A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 15 FBTrOSEP EOR THE JPPER PLANNING AREA (PAI) WITH RETAIL AMENITIES THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT Adds ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL FEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TGROGRAPHY TO PROVIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT THE LOWER PENINSULA SITE M PLANNING AREA (RAW) 15 PROPOSED TO CONTAIN RETAIL. THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE Je TER -FRONT LOCATION AND 51TE VI5181LIiY FROM 1-10 TO Eppead E "TER SPORTS. THIS ACTIVItt NODE WOULD ALSO 5ERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY. THE KEY FROXIMITY AND VISIBILITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARD ROAD, AND WHEAT RIDGE-WARC•'aipGGiSTATICN CORRIDORS WILL CAREER A IMIGUF LEVEL W VITALITY AND COMMJNITr SYNERGY THAT WILL BE FURTHER ENHANCED BY THE OVERALL C01FLEMENTARY ARCHITECTURAL LAJDF.CAPE ANO CO`PNMITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WL -19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CLTNGEPTJAL IN NATURE SPECIFIC DEVELGfl¢NT ELEMENTS SUCH AS SITE LAYWT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELORIENT PLAN MUST BE 5U45MITTED AND AFPROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE WBMITTAL OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR PANILDING PERMIT AFPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT 51M DEVELOPMENT. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING, SHALL BE N CONPORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 W THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL EMERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL 51GN4SE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. BILLBOARDS ARE PROHIBITED. ARCHITECTURAL, SITE, AND STREETSCAFE DESIGN SHALL BE IN CO60RMANCE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL (ASPM) AND 5LREETSCAFE DESIGN MANUAL. OUTDOOR STORAGE: BOATS ANC) INVENTORY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS CLNPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION 26-628. STANDARDS FOR 0FF-57REE7 VEHICULAR MARLING, BICYCLE PARKING, AND LOADING PARADE FOR MULTIUSE EUILDINGB SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE O BUILDINGS, AND STRUCTURED "ARCING 18 ENCOURAGED, WERE FRACTGAL. FREE-5TANCING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE PETERMINED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PROFOSET) USE. BICYCLE PAWING AND VEHICULAR LOApNG FOR PASSENGERS AND, AS APPROPRIATE, MERCHANDISE. SHALL BE PROVIDED N CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRUCTURES. SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPING AND OTHER SIMILAR MWNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMI ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOYED, FROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCE55DRY 57RNC7URE5 5HALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY PERCENT O THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE OR 57RJCTURE5 ON THE SUBJECT LOT. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS WALL BE COMPRISED OF FOR16, MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIELE WITH THE ARGHRECTURAL OJALTIE6 W THE PRIMARY BUILDInG. DRIVE THRU'S ARE PROHIBITED PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BIIILDIIJ'a COVERAGE JM5 LAKE HOLDIFGS, LLC T0% &JILD TO -l0 TRENTAL£ ROAD 0-.0' FROM PROPERTY LINE 20% BUILD TO WARD ROAD 0 -ND FROM PROPERTY LINE 10% MAXIMUM &NILDINi HEIGHT 90MIN. 90' MAK (6 5TORIE5) PLANNING AREA 2 JM5 LAKE HOLDIFGS, LLC THINK TANK STUDIO, INC 919 SWTH LNCE ROAD PO BOX 18I MINIMUi'I SETBACK FROM PROPERTY EREPERICK CO 80530 10' FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE MAXIMUM E MILDING HEIGHT 301 35' MAX (3 STCRIEB) I ntages seemcrease or since theyreflectm on next JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS 9, fq 11 n 12 NICHOLAS GARDENS, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED i0 TIE DEP! OF HIGMVAYS STATE OF COLORADO. IN A OWED REWRDED FEBRUARY Z 1998 IN BOCK IRS AT PM£ 984 A PORTON OF TIE NCRTHEA9i V4 OF SECTON W TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 91 PM. CWNIY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 22M ACRES MJfE OR LESS ( 99024898 SF 1/-) WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION PP�LL�NE W 49TH STREET H W W H rn w O Z O 0 CE O (D Z Q ----------------- WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA 0 0 irQ 3 1-70 prate for referto OPEN SPACE & ent letter. smallerthan 1g and would fntally e site VICINITY MAP: A) SUBJECT TO NITRE OETERMNATION THAT DESIRED INARE55 AND EGRESS LOCATICMS ARE FEASIBLE AND OETAILEP B) PA -2 SHALL INCLUDE A POND THAT IS NO LESS THAN 2 ACRES IN SIZE, PROVIDED THAT THE POND MAY ALSO SERCF AS A STORMWATER MANA(EMENT FACILITY AND THAT THE LAND OWNER MAY SEEK AFI ROVAL OF Mi PLANS FOR THE 517E NOT TO INCLUDE THE POND IN THE EVENT THAT (A) WATER DEPLETIONS FROM THE HISTORIC OR RECONFIGURED FOND ARE DEEMED SUBJECT TO REPLACEMENT (8) THE POND IS NO LONGER A PASSIVE OR OPERATIONAL AMENITY FOR USES AND DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. OR (C) MORE INTEN51 RE OR CCNRIW IFA'a USE OF LAND OCCUPIED BY THE POND 15 COMPELLED BY LAID USE PLANE, COURT ORDER OR OTHER DIRECTLY APPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL- ACTION. OR LANDSCAFE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN PA -1 AND PA -2 SHALL BE AT LEAST 15% AND SHALL OTHERWISE BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-602 We THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. O) ARBORIST WILL IPEMIFY NON-INVASIVE AND deadNUISANCESPECIES W TREES TO BE FRESERVED. 0 60' 120' 200' GR.AP41C�200' 0' PROJECT TEAM OWNER: ARCHITECT: JM5 LAKE HOLDIFGS, LLC THINK TANK STUDIO, INC 919 SWTH LNCE ROAD PO BOX 18I LARCEJCDv' CO 80th EREPERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MARC JOL6TAD CONTACT: PATRICIA BERREND 301 ARCHITECT. NCARB 303-960-9925 BNRVETOR: REBIND SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AIRPORT ROAD ROOKY RIDGE CONE U 14Nt5 Boost COLORADO W301 420 21st AVENUE CONTACT: ROBERT J. RUBINO PLS LONGNMONT, OO W501 (303) OH -W5 CONTACT JOEL 5EAMOOB PE, 303-651-6626 The meas agree dariei or 1Aga1N dnngretm atei tha ed,, dy hereby agree that the pvpaty lelally d9spU2d heem well de cost as a Mennen Dera'cprent in md¢tlanee on tee ri res9dtlom and nmillms e Menai in this plan, and as easy imse e ha reeulred try Joe pap) W w Irlha fee DVA that me appyAll of s rennin to IPlnned 0. dcpnent end egxwel of th, yuhhe Ueeebproom pen does NO aeaR a rested p VAR rmL Vestad propaee, lights Key my arse and everne pvwent to the nonsense of Kanter 26 Us of In whose: page Code of Laws. (Mark Jolslad - wmer JMS Lake Hddings LLC) Shod of Loaned I 1 as Gare of.aaesm I The mrRglng Instrument was admsMeegal neddre me this say of _ AD 20_ Cy NAh,azs no To and of nal Real My comms Vannes'. Nomre nmlp SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE m redone ta'Wdy test me Hunts of me sdUeary, of JMS lake Hoallgs LLC ass mase My Ire or mee na down sepomsLn and to tee real of T/ kmmeegA monster ext telitt in eocpeenee an ell appleede aosido symay, dumM1 reused de9er as mended me aemrYerReaing plan accwe@ly hypo cents said ounce, CLIMEARD D1vp agnaWre, COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE Sate of Loaned I 1 as Dane of .efmon I 1 home/ same that the pan was had In No olfm W Not emne Code and Re¢Ne of Jefferson County at Cdtlen, Cdaado, at ddock—M on the �y of AD, in Pmk, Pa3o rACNlaon No— JEFFERSON CIXINIY CLERK AND RECORDER BY Deputy PUNNING COMMISSION CEWIRCATION Co mmendo] for ap(m21 this day of b/ the wheat Edged Panel Carta on CheNeKon CIN CERTIFIC4T1oN Amneyal this day of Ay the wheat Ede Cry CJVcl1. ATTEST Ge Next Mayor Camnlnity Deadcpnent Direcbr SHEET INDEX: OOP[ 1 COVER SHEET ODP 2 1 LAND USE MAP ME THINKTANK ■■1 a :, a 1 o art osetoe UR UWP MIMus pal berhand - archil nears patrkksdM1Nkterkeludb/nt P,hi 9IXL9974948 (mnblle) 303-9609925 V ES 0 -1 REF 0- W H J - T_ CL LH W q z U RD Q z w W Ll PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ODP 1 JOB NUMBER Lu 0 o BUILDING PAD J Ir SEE NOTE 2 QEl W NG 0 U I I ■ 1// r, SEE NOTE 3 JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLOSEE RADO NOTE TMSTA STATE OF & 1ZOLO NICHOLAS A DEED NR RE EM ET T T PORTION DONVEYEG TO NNE DEPT OF XIGNNAY6, STATE OE COLOBA K 1IN A DEEDS 36S. EO FE%UPNOF THE NO BOOFFEA TBBB AT PAGE ON A SIHIP OF THE RANGE 0 Va OF sTHE ft SIDR TCWNG NT 8 SOUTH, RANGE B9 WEST OF THE M PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATEC9024IDO I -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT DONrAINING9znAcaESNOIaEOR1,=GS (eeoza•sPHIE +/ SEE NOTE 4 J s RAUT "A" SE OTE IBDd SEE NOTE 4 ROAD GGGNTAGE n L VII Bold Lu BUILDING PAD = SEE NOTE 7 G PLANNINGOPEN SPACE e �G AREA 1 SEE NOTE 2 �P Q P VE w 4.86 ACRES KEGGpE GO �•�.o•+•�v BDId n O OANG o00o Lv `v v OG o gU\L • ..00o•.� P 31T��milli) ARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT O 60' 130' SKETCH PLAN J) GRAPHIC SCALE: I' = 60'-0' Bold LAND SUMMARY BANNING AREA 4B6 ADffS BANNING AREA 3 Q TOTAL SITE �� z 0 - UBold Y BUILDING PAD M<Ef DUELLING, LIVE / WORK PLANNING SEE NOTE 2 pet Dbem - archilnmb RffiLD, CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL NCWDING: apCko w ~ P AREA 2 (re 303-997A91 PERMITTED USES WELD USES ANO BUILDMGS 17.87 ACRES PARKING F F URBAN GARDENS P F UTILITIES, MINOR Bold WARD POND 1 IRI BDd 31T��milli) ARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT O 60' 130' SKETCH PLAN J) GRAPHIC SCALE: I' = 60'-0' Bold LAND SUMMARY BANNING AREA 4B6 ADffS BANNING AREA 3 I MSIACRES TOTAL SITE 1 23. 13 ACRES LEGEr1D: P PER-IILLED USE NP NOT PEWITTED UBE 54EE7 NOTES: and T u EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT F B)FERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO 'DECLARATION OF EASEMENT / v FROPOSEO DRI AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT 5DP 5JBMITTAL. 3) EMERGENCY 5ERVICE, MGRE`a5 / EGRESS ONLY. 4) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO COFMEOT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH OR055 WALK ACROSS 1-10 FROFT ROAD. 6) DITCHES MAY BE RE -ALIGNED OR BURIED AS REQUIRED. 1) SLOPE EASEMENT BO.WDARf S Th15 BXISTIng,OF 5) THE CO1 NNF r DEVELO ENT DIRECTORPr0POSBd? DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY F£1I OR ALLOIIED ON THE HAB15 OF IT BEING BIHILAR TO A LISTED UBE, COMPATIBLE IN CHARACTER AND IMPACT WITH USES IN THE ZONE DlsrROT COWESTENr WITH THE 1NTENr OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH WOULD NOT 6E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BREASON OF DOOR RADIATION, WHAT, RAF CC GENERATIONPARKING NEEDSOUTDOORSTCRAGEE OR NEE, OR S NOT HAZARDOUS TO THE HEALTH AND SAFELY OF SJRROUNDMG AREAS THFOI DANGER OF FIRE OR EXB0510N. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJU5RTENr AS AN INLERRffLATION REQUEST. PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOB NUMBER ALLO¢D USES THINK TANK FA -0 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDMC. e ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P PERMITTED AND LLSE5 ARE SHOWN IN THE FOLLOWUNG TABLE, USES NOT LISTED SHALL BE P DEEMED EXCLUDED. DUELLING, LIVE / WORK P pet Dbem - archilnmb RffiLD, CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL NCWDING: apCko 3NRWUeU P (re 303-997A91 PERMITTED USES WELD USES ANO BUILDMGS (mobile) 303-980F9925 LEGEr1D: P PER-IILLED USE NP NOT PEWITTED UBE 54EE7 NOTES: and T u EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT F B)FERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO 'DECLARATION OF EASEMENT / v FROPOSEO DRI AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT 5DP 5JBMITTAL. 3) EMERGENCY 5ERVICE, MGRE`a5 / EGRESS ONLY. 4) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO COFMEOT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH OR055 WALK ACROSS 1-10 FROFT ROAD. 6) DITCHES MAY BE RE -ALIGNED OR BURIED AS REQUIRED. 1) SLOPE EASEMENT BO.WDARf S Th15 BXISTIng,OF 5) THE CO1 NNF r DEVELO ENT DIRECTORPr0POSBd? DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY F£1I OR ALLOIIED ON THE HAB15 OF IT BEING BIHILAR TO A LISTED UBE, COMPATIBLE IN CHARACTER AND IMPACT WITH USES IN THE ZONE DlsrROT COWESTENr WITH THE 1NTENr OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH WOULD NOT 6E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BREASON OF DOOR RADIATION, WHAT, RAF CC GENERATIONPARKING NEEDSOUTDOORSTCRAGEE OR NEE, OR S NOT HAZARDOUS TO THE HEALTH AND SAFELY OF SJRROUNDMG AREAS THFOI DANGER OF FIRE OR EXB0510N. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJU5RTENr AS AN INLERRffLATION REQUEST. PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOB NUMBER ALLO¢D USES PA -I FA -0 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDMC. ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P D.ELLING, MULTIPLE P DUELLING, LIVE / WORK P RffiLD, CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL NCWDING: CQ UUITY BUILDINGS INOLGDMG LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P HARCB OPEN SPACE AND PLAZAS F F WELD USES ANO BUILDMGS F RECREATION FACILITIES, INDOOR F F URBAN GARDENS P F UTILITIES, MINOR P COF1FBROAL SERVICES AND RETAIL ANIMAL DAYCARE P P BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - NO DRIVE THEIR P P BARS. TAVERNS, AND NIGHT CLU55 P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOAT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND TRAILER SALES, RENTALS, a SERVICE P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P EATING ESTABLISHMENT P P FAST FOOp EA9NG ESTABLISHMENT - NO DRI VE THRU P P MICROB BBRIFF, M1C¢ODISTILLEFf WITH TAP ROdS P P MOROBREWERY, MICRODISTILLERY WITHOUT TAP ROOM P F MBR3ONAL SERVICES P F FHOTCCOPYIFG AND PRINTIW' P P PRODUCE STANDS P P RECREATION FACILRIE5, Cq'IMERCIAL P P REPAIR AURAL AND SIBIM CIFYS OF BOATS - OUTDOOR STORAGE P RETAIL SALES UP TO .0000 Gff FOR ONE TENANT SPACE P P URBAN GARI F P ,IETERINAR! OFFICE AND HOSPITALS - NO OUTDOOR PENS P P HOSFITALITY AND ENTERTAMMENT ART SnDIOS AND GALLERIES F F HOTEL$ MOTELS P 57JDIO5,N IPG ART, MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RADIO P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P CEFICES P P ANCILLARY USES FARKIN.G FACILITES F F TEMFORAW USES SFECIAL EVENTS, INCLUDING FESTIVALS AND PAWERS MARKET F F LEGEr1D: P PER-IILLED USE NP NOT PEWITTED UBE 54EE7 NOTES: and T u EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT F B)FERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO 'DECLARATION OF EASEMENT / v FROPOSEO DRI AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT 5DP 5JBMITTAL. 3) EMERGENCY 5ERVICE, MGRE`a5 / EGRESS ONLY. 4) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO COFMEOT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH OR055 WALK ACROSS 1-10 FROFT ROAD. 6) DITCHES MAY BE RE -ALIGNED OR BURIED AS REQUIRED. 1) SLOPE EASEMENT BO.WDARf S Th15 BXISTIng,OF 5) THE CO1 NNF r DEVELO ENT DIRECTORPr0POSBd? DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY F£1I OR ALLOIIED ON THE HAB15 OF IT BEING BIHILAR TO A LISTED UBE, COMPATIBLE IN CHARACTER AND IMPACT WITH USES IN THE ZONE DlsrROT COWESTENr WITH THE 1NTENr OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH WOULD NOT 6E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BREASON OF DOOR RADIATION, WHAT, RAF CC GENERATIONPARKING NEEDSOUTDOORSTCRAGEE OR NEE, OR S NOT HAZARDOUS TO THE HEALTH AND SAFELY OF SJRROUNDMG AREAS THFOI DANGER OF FIRE OR EXB0510N. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJU5RTENr AS AN INLERRffLATION REQUEST. PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOB NUMBER CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT IS TO REHABILITATE THIS POWER GRAVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMIERaAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SURROUNDING APRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL AND UNIQUE AYBJI Y FOR THE RESIDENTS AND PATRONS OF OPUS DEVELOPMENT AND THE GREATER 001111 ITS. THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURIFAG ON THE LANE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE'FRIMART GATE"Y' ASPECT OF THIS DEVELOF'IEM. THE PROJECT FRq'05E5 TRANSIT 5UFFORTIVE U5E5 AND DENSITIES GIVEN THE PROXIMITY 70 THE WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION. A RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY 15 FRTrOSEp EOR THE JPPER PLANNING, AREA (PAC WITH RETAIL AMENITIES THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL FEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TGpSSRAPHY TO PROVIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRmT THE LOWER PENINSULA SITE M P1.4di AREA (RAW) 15 PROPOSED TO CONTAIN RETAIL. THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE WATER -FRONT LOCATION AND 51M YBIBILTY FROM 1-10 TO EHGLCASE "TER SPORTS. THIS ACCLsin NODE WOULD ALSO 5ERVE 70 CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY. THE KEY FROXIMITY AND VISIBILITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARP ROAD, AND WHEAT RIDGE -WARP STREET STATION CORRIDORS WILL QEER A UNIONS LEVEL W VITALITY AND COMMUNITY SYNERGY THAT WILL BE FURTHER ENHANCED BY THE OVERALL COMPLEMENTARY ARCHITECTURAL LAJDF.CAPE ANP GGYMU ITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WZ-19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC DEVELGfl¢NT ELEMENTS SUCH AS SITE LAYOUT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE N07 BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELORIENT PLAN MOST BE 5JBMITTED AND AFFFS) NED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE WBMITTAL OF A RIGHT -OP -WAY OR PAIILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT 517E DEVELOPMENT. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING, SHALL BE N CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 W THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL 5V11 RIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL 51GF4GE SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTI4E VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. BILLBOARDS ARE PROHIBITED. ARCHITECTURAL, SITE, AND STREETSCAFE DESIGN SHALL BE IN CONEOR SSRI WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL (ASPM) AND 5LREETSCAFE DESIGN MANUAL. OUTDOOR STORA GE: BOATS ANIS) INVENTORY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS COMPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION 26-628. STANDARDS FOR C F-57REEi VEHICULAR PARKING, BICYCLE PAISSUNGa, AND LOADING PARADE FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF BWLDINGB AND STRICTURED PARKING 18 ENOOU UE iD, WHERE FIRPCTICA-. RIBE-5TANPINS COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE PETERTRI BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PROPOSE) USE. BICYCLE PARWNG AND VEHICULAR LOADNG FOR PASSENGERS AND, AS APPROPRIATE, MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE PROVIDED N CLOSE PROXIHLY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRICTURES. SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPING AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARf ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRICTURES. ACCESSORY STRICTURES SHALL BE ALLOYED, FROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCE55DRY 57FWC7URE5 544111. NOT EXCEED TIIENTY PERCENT OF THE FOOTFR IM OCCUPIED BY THE PRIMARY STRUCTURE OR 57RJCTURE5 ON THE SUBJECT LOT. ACCESSORY BUILDINGS WALL BE COMPRISED OF FOAMS MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIELE WITH THE ARGHRECTURA. QUALITIES W THE PRIMARY BUILDING DRIVE THRI'6 ARE PROHIBITED PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BIIILDIIJ'a COVERAGE JM5 LAKE HOLDIFGS, LLC T0% &JILD TO -r,0 FRONTAGE ROAD 0-.0' FROM PROFERTY LINE 20% BUILD TO WARD ROAD 0 -ND FROM PROPERTY LINE 10% MAXIMUM &dILDINi HEIGHT 90MIN. 90' MAK (6 5TORIE5) PLANNING AREA 2 JM5 LAKE HOLDIFGS, LLC THINK TANK STUDIO, INC 919 SOUTH LAKE ROAD PO BOX TBI MINIMUM SETBACK FROM PROPERTY EREPERICK CO 80530 10' FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE MAXIMUM E MILDING HEIGHT 301 35' MAX (3 STORIEB) JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS 9, fq 11 n 12 NICHOLAS GARDENS, EXCEPT THAT PgiFION CONVEYED TO TIE DEPT OF HIGHWAYS STATE OF COLORADO. IN A OWED RECORDED FE&RIPAY Z 1968 IN BOCK 1999 AT PM£ 984 A PORTON OF TIE NORETHEIST V4 OF SECTON W TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 61 P.M. CGINIY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 22M ACRES MORE OR LESS ( 99024898 SF 1/-) WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION ol W 49TH STREET H W W H fn w O Z O 0 CE O (D Z Q ----------------- WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA 0 0 irQ 3 1-70 0 60' 120' 200' VICINITY MAP: G�,PHI��SC�F. 1- -%0-e. OPEN SPACE & LANDSCAPING A) SUBJECT TO NNRE OEtERMNAtION THAT Pi 5hel INARE55 ANE EGRESS LOCATIONS ARE FEASIBLE ANP OETAILEP PESIW RESPONSIVE TO THE THEN-EXI5TI4G ANO PROPOSED LAND USES ON THE SUBJECT SITE MIO PROVIDED THAT AN APPROPRIATE MECHANISM 15 IDENTIFIED TO TRANSFER LIABILITY FOR PERSONS AND ACTIVITIES ORIGINATING FROM CEP -SITE LOCATION THE SITE SHALL INCLUDE A PUBLICLY-ACCESBILE MULTI -USE TRAIL CONNECTING TO THE CRY'S LINEAR PARK NORTH OF THE 1-10 PR NFLAGE ROAD. B) PA -2 SHALL INCLUDE A POND THAT IS NO LESS THAN 2 ACRES IN SIZE, PROVIDED THAT THE POND MAY ALSO SERVE AS A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY AND THAT THE LAND OWNER MAY SEEK APPROVAL OF NN,ff PLANS FOR THE 517E NOT TO INCLUDE THE POND IN THE EVENT THAT (A) "MR DEPLETIONS FROM THE HISTORIC OR RECONFIGURED FOND ARE DEEMED SUBJECT TO REPLACEMENT (8) THE POND IS NO LOW ER A PASSIVE OR OPERATIONAL AMENITY FOR USES AND DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE. OR (C) MORE INTEN51 RE OR GDR IFA'a USE OF LAND OCCUPIED BY THE POND 15 COMPELLED BY LAND USE PLANE, COURT ORDER OR OFFER DIRECTLY AFPLICABLE GOVERNMENTAL. ACTION. OR LANDSCAFE COVERAGE FOR EACH DEVELOPABLE LOT IN PA -I AND PA -2 SHALL BE AT LEAST 15% AND SHALL OTHERWISE BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-602 W THE WHEAT RIDGE COPE OF LAWS. )1 ARBORIST WILL 1)ENTIFY NON-INVASIVE AND NeedNUISANCESPECIES W TREES TO BE PRESERVED. PROJECT TEAM OWNER- ARCHITECT: JM5 LAKE HOLDIFGS, LLC THINK TANK STUDIO, INC 919 SOUTH LAKE ROAD PO BOX TBI LiJ<JCwc , PC 8021 EREPERICK CO 80530 CONTACT: MARC JOL5TAD CONTACT: PATRIIX BERQEIND 301 ARCHITECT. NC4R5 303-960-9925 BIRVEYOR RIBINO SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AIRPORT ROAD ROOKY RIDGE CONEWLTAMS BOULDER COLORADO W301 42011at AVENUE CONTACT: ROBERT J. RUBINO PLS LONGTONT, OO W501 (303)464-WI5 CONTACT JOEL SERMONS PE, 303-651-6626 The mlow Spred mens I, or 1Aga1N drepreted atansal. MORAD, on henry amen that the property lelally Admitted eeml will be dedek5etl as a Portion Deva'cpTent in mooOnce with iT ul Conaeom and nonnhms contained in this NOT and as nay MKmlse W Rqulred try ew, I pap) Wrlh r fec OPH that lre appyAll of s Mori to (Planned CH aliment end approval of TS Wfhe de olopmell pen, does Pont agate a vested prothe right Vested propdty lights Key my wise and sconce present to the porlskns of 9eA m 26 El of lie WRAP RI Cole of Laws. (Mark tested - ovarl JMS LAND Hdtlinga LLC) State of Cohedo I 1 as Canty of.aee-set I The ForRWing Instalment was admsMetlgal before me this aay of _ AD 201 by Wtheas no To ami otfiaal east My commss'm Vannes'. Notary Rm1[ SUFSEPORS CERTIFICATE d ReMby Jerry test the survey of The, bolxeary N JMS take HOINIIgs LLC `oas matle by Ire or order my de9N suRemem and to the Feet of Fre kmmodgA Inbnneter em met in eoceal an su applkede aVasda shades, aumM1 haysm mekn as mender, Me acmrrerrang plan sccure@ly resents said wmey, CLIPSAWD yes) Agri couMY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE State of Colonel I 1 as Gamy of . efsxn I 1 hereat same tret dna pan was elm In do o fm Of lire county Kenn and Founder of Jefferson county at Cotler, Cdaado, at ddock—M on file Byrn AD, in Rmk , Pope RecNmon No— JEFFERSON (CANNILY CLERK AND RECORDER BY Deputy PUNNING COMMISSION CEWIRCATION LFecommentlm for akm✓al this day of de the Wrest Edged Pbni Commisson Cheperson CIN CERTIFICAT1oN AmPoseel this day of A the Wleat Ede Cry OJVcl1. ATTEST Ob Olek Mayor Coundenry Drdcprent Director SHEET INDEX: ODP1 1 COVER SHEET ODP 2 1 LAND (LSE MAP ME THINKTANK ■■1 a :, d 1 o artTMCW,e uRn UWP inlMus pill bernal - archil nmrb patrlck9tbNktikaludlo3Wt (Metre) 973-9974995 (mobile) 303-9609925 V z 0 -1 REF 0— w H J — T_ CL LH w q z U RD Q z Die w cf) F— Q w u Ll c¢ PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ODP 1 JOB NUMBER Lu 0 o BUILDING PAD w Ir SEE NOTE 2 Qo C5 Im W N� 0 U I I ■ 1// r, SEE NOTE 3 JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLOSEE RADO NOTE TMSTA STATE OF & 1ZOLO NICHOLAS A DEED NR RE EM ET T T PORTION DONVEYEG TO NNE DEPT OF XIGNNAY6, STATE O£ COLOBA K 1IN A DEEDS 36S. EO FE%UPNOF THE NO BOCK TBBB AT PAGE ON A SIHIP OF THE RANGE 0 ES OF sTHE ft SIDR TOWNSHIP 8 BOOTH, RANGE B9 WEST OF THE M PM. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATEC9024IDO I -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT DONrAINING9znAcaESNOIaEOR1,=BS (eeozaBSBHIE +/ SEE NOTE 4 TAT c c' 0A SEE NOTE 4 w PLANNING Q AREA 1 cn cn 4.86 ACRES v gU\LO\NO E Q RFLA BUILDING PAD SEE NOTE 2 1-70 NOTE 7 OPEN SPACE OPg� Y BUILDING PAD PLANNING SEE NOTE 2 AREA 2 17.87 ACRES PARKING WARD POND 31TEImilli) ARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT O 60' 130' SKETCH PLAN J) GRAPHIC SCALE: I' = 60'-0' )AII Q F— CU F— LAND SUMMARY BANNING AREA I AB6 ADffS BANNING AREA 3 1 ACRES TOTAL SITE 23. 13 ACRES LEGEr1D: P PER-IITTED USE NP NOT PEWITTED UBE SHEET NOTES: u EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT F B)FERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO 'DECLARATION OF EASEMENT v FROPOSEO DRI AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT 5DP 5JBMITTAL. 3) EMERGENCY 5ERVICE, MGRE`a5 / EGRESS ONLY. A) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONFECT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH OR055 WALK ACROSS 1-10 FROfFT ROAD. 6) DITCHES MAY BE RE -ALIGNED OR BURIED AS REQUIRED. 1) SLOPE EASEMENT BOUNDARY e) THE CO`R'NNF r DEVELO ENT DIRECTOR HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE 50 F£1I OR ALLOIIED ON THE BASIS OF IT BEING BIHILAR TO A LISTED UBE, COMPATIBLE IN CHARACTER AND IMPACT WITH USES IN THE ZONE DIsrROT COWESTENr WITH THE 1NTENr OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH WOULD NOT 6E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BREASON OF DOOR RADIATION, WHAT, RAF CC GENERATIONPARKING NEEDSOUTDOORSTCRAGEE OR NEE, OR S NOT HAZARDOUS TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF SJRROUNDMG AREAS THFOI DANGER OF FIRE OR EXBO510N. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJU5TMENr AS AN INTERRffTATION REQUEST. V w z c� 4[ w z CL w H w 1 ~ w w Q z J 0 U PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOB NUMBER ALLO¢D USES THINK TANK FA -0 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDMC. e ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P D.ELLING, MULTIPLE P PERMITTED AND LLSE5 ARE SHPLN N THE FOLLOWUNG TABLE, USES NOT LISTED SHALL BE DEEMED EXCLUDED. pet Dbem - archilnmb CQ UUITY BCILDINGS INOLCDMG LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS apCko 3NRWUtlq)IeU HARCB OPEN SPACE AND PLAZAS F (re 303-997499 PERMITTED USES (mobile) 303-980F9925 LEGEr1D: P PER-IITTED USE NP NOT PEWITTED UBE SHEET NOTES: u EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT F B)FERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO 'DECLARATION OF EASEMENT v FROPOSEO DRI AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT 5DP 5JBMITTAL. 3) EMERGENCY 5ERVICE, MGRE`a5 / EGRESS ONLY. A) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONFECT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH OR055 WALK ACROSS 1-10 FROfFT ROAD. 6) DITCHES MAY BE RE -ALIGNED OR BURIED AS REQUIRED. 1) SLOPE EASEMENT BOUNDARY e) THE CO`R'NNF r DEVELO ENT DIRECTOR HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE 50 F£1I OR ALLOIIED ON THE BASIS OF IT BEING BIHILAR TO A LISTED UBE, COMPATIBLE IN CHARACTER AND IMPACT WITH USES IN THE ZONE DIsrROT COWESTENr WITH THE 1NTENr OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH WOULD NOT 6E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BREASON OF DOOR RADIATION, WHAT, RAF CC GENERATIONPARKING NEEDSOUTDOORSTCRAGEE OR NEE, OR S NOT HAZARDOUS TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF SJRROUNDMG AREAS THFOI DANGER OF FIRE OR EXBO510N. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJU5TMENr AS AN INTERRffTATION REQUEST. V w z c� 4[ w z CL w H w 1 ~ w w Q z J 0 U PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOB NUMBER ALLO¢D USES PA -I FA -0 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDMC. P ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY P D.ELLING, MULTIPLE P DUELLING, LIVE / WORK P RffiLD, CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL NI CQ UUITY BCILDINGS INOLCDMG LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P HARCB OPEN SPACE AND PLAZAS F F WELD USES ANO BUILDMGS F RECREATION FACILITIES, INDOOR F F URBAN GARDENS P F UTILITIES, MINOR P CO`1FBROAL SERVICES AND RETAIL ANIMAL DAYCARE P P BANKS AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - NO DRIVE THEIR P P BARS. TAVERNS, AND NIGHT CLU55 P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P BOAT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND TRAILER SALES, RENTALS, a SERVICE P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P EATING ESTABLISHMENT P P FAST FOOp EA9NG ESTABLISHMENT - NO DRI VE THRU P P MICROB BBRIFF, M1C¢ODISTILLEFf WITH TAP ROdS P P MOROBREWERY, MICRODISTILLERY WITHOUT TAP ROOM P F MBR50NAL SERVICES P F PHOTOCOPYING AND PRINTIW' P P F DJCE STANDS P P RECREATION FACILRIE5, Cq'IMERCIAL P P REPAIR AURAL AND SIBIM CIFYS OF BOATS - OUTDOOR STORAGE P RETAIL SALES UP TO .0000 Gff FOR ONE TENANT SPACE P P URBAN GARI F P ,IETERINAR! OFFICE AND HOSPITALS - NO OUTDOOR PENS P P HOSFITALITY AND ENTERTAMMENT ART SnDIOS AND GALLERIES F F HOTEL$ MOTELS P 57JDIO5,N IPG ART, MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RADIO P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P CEFICES F P ANCILLARY USES FARKIN.G FACILITES F F TEMFORAW USES SFECIAL EVENTS, INCLUDING FESTIVALS AND FAWERS MARKET F F LEGEr1D: P PER-IITTED USE NP NOT PEWITTED UBE SHEET NOTES: u EASTERN ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT F B)FERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO 'DECLARATION OF EASEMENT v FROPOSEO DRI AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT 5DP 5JBMITTAL. 3) EMERGENCY 5ERVICE, MGRE`a5 / EGRESS ONLY. A) VEHICLE ACCESS 5) PED TRAIL TO CONFECT TO LINEAR PARK (BY CITY) WITH OR055 WALK ACROSS 1-10 FROfFT ROAD. 6) DITCHES MAY BE RE -ALIGNED OR BURIED AS REQUIRED. 1) SLOPE EASEMENT BOUNDARY e) THE CO`R'NNF r DEVELO ENT DIRECTOR HAS THE AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE THAT A USE NOT SPECIFICALLY LISTED SHOULD BE 50 F£1I OR ALLOIIED ON THE BASIS OF IT BEING BIHILAR TO A LISTED UBE, COMPATIBLE IN CHARACTER AND IMPACT WITH USES IN THE ZONE DIsrROT COWESTENr WITH THE 1NTENr OF THE DISTRICT, AND WHICH WOULD NOT 6E OBJECTIONABLE TO NEARBY PROPERTY BREASON OF DOOR RADIATION, WHAT, RAF CC GENERATIONPARKING NEEDSOUTDOORSTCRAGEE OR NEE, OR S NOT HAZARDOUS TO THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF SJRROUNDMG AREAS THFOI DANGER OF FIRE OR EXBO510N. THE DIRECTOR'S DECISION MAY BE APPLIED TO THE BOARD OF ADJU5TMENr AS AN INTERRffTATION REQUEST. V w z c� 4[ w z CL w H w 1 ~ w w Q z J 0 U PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 JOB NUMBER TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For JMS Lake Wheat Ridge, Colorado February 2020 Revised: June 2020 Prepared for: Think Tank Studio PO Box 781 Frederick, Colorado 80350 Prepared by: SM ROCHA, LLC TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 23410 06/09/2020 8703 Yates Drive, Suite 210 Westminster, Colorado 80031 (303)458-9798 Project Engineer: Stephen Simon, EIT Engineer in Responsible Charge: Fred Lantz, PE 20-011145 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 Table of Contents Page I. Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 ProjectOverview...........................................................................................................................1 StudyArea Boundaries.................................................................................................................1 SiteDescription.............................................................................................................................1 Existing and Committed Surface Transportation Network.............................................................4 II. Existing Traffic Conditions...........................................................................................................5 Existing Traffic Analysis Results...................................................................................................7 III. Future Traffic Conditions Without Proposed Development......................................................8 Background Traffic Analysis Results — Year 2022......................................................................11 Background Traffic Analysis Results — Year 2040......................................................................12 IV. Proposed Project Traffic...........................................................................................................13 TripGeneration...........................................................................................................................13 Adjustments to Trip Generation Rates........................................................................................14 TripDistribution...........................................................................................................................14 TripAssignment..........................................................................................................................14 V. Future Traffic Conditions With Proposed Developments........................................................16 VI. Project Impacts..........................................................................................................................19 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service...................................................................................19 Total Traffic Analysis Results Upon Development Build-Out......................................................20 VII. Conclusion................................................................................................................................22 SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page i JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 List of Figures Page Figure1 — Location..............................................................................................................................2 — Existing Traffic.................................................7 Figure2 — Site Plan.............................................................................................................................3 Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary Figure 3 — Existing Traffic Volumes.....................................................................................................6 Table 3 — Figure 4 — Background Traffic Volumes — Year 2022..........................................................................9 Figure 5 — Background Traffic Volumes — Year 2040........................................................................10 Figure 6 — Distribution and Site Generated Assignment....................................................................15 Trip Generation Summary .................................................................................................14 Figure 7 — Total Traffic Volumes — Year 2022...................................................................................17 Table 6 — Figure 8 — Total Traffic Volumes — Year 2040...................................................................................18 List of Tables Page Table 1 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Existing Traffic.................................................7 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Table 2 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Background Traffic — Year 2022 ....................11 Table 3 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Background Traffic — Year 2040 ....................12 Table 4 — Trip Generation Rates.......................................................................................................13 Table 5 — Trip Generation Summary .................................................................................................14 Table 6 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Total Traffic — Year 2022 ...............................19 Table 7 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Total Traffic — Year 2040 ...............................20 Appendices APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS APPENDIX C CAPACITY WORKSHEETS SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page ii JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 I. Introduction Project Overview This traffic impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements associated with the development entitled JMS Lake. This proposed mixed-use development is anticipated to consist of multi -family residential housing, retail businesses, a sit-down restaurant, and marine dealership sales accompanying a wakeboard park. The development is located to the southeast corner of the intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Study Area Boundaries The study area to be examined in this analysis encompasses the W 1-70 Frontage Road intersections with Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, Tabor Street, and proposed site accesses. Figure 1 illustrates location of the site and study intersections. Site Description Specific land uses and densities are currently undefined. However, for purposes of this analysis the proposed development is assumed to entail the new construction of approximately 100 mid -rise residential dwelling units, up to 30,000 square feet of retail shopping uses, an approximate 5,000 square foot sit-down restaurant, and up to 25,000 square feet of aquatics related dealership and servicing sales. Densities are generally determined based upon the available buildable area multiplied by a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.2, which is considered typical for commercial oriented businesses. Land for the development is currently vacant and surrounded by a mix of commercial, light industrial, medical, and open space land uses. Proposed access to the development is provided at the following locations: one full -movement access onto W 1-70 Frontage Road between Ward Road and Van Gordon Street (referred to as Access A), and one full -movement access onto W 1-70 Frontage Road east of Van Gordon Street (referred to as Access B). For purposes of this study, it is anticipated that development construction would be completed by end of Year 2022. A conceptual site plan, as prepared by Think Tank Studio, is shown on Figure 2. This plan is provided for illustrative purposes. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 1 N r Z O N CN CN '^ y �1� /•��e! VJ y}aoN o LL UO O J Z !, LU H ff; N 1' L w �o _ a, � a i (F �1 • Y 1 YR �� � �i f I •• V 1 �' v � � ♦ a B t ft —_ �- a �. � L ; � =.� r w �. EIr •.- - - K � ' tat d. `Y � 1 e t MMed .1 , c+ k - _. -. in a�cr�; �u�i fit•. i t1 � �=.YQ� �` CO It 43 .7 � ac. M� _ �r��� rrte�,,•• r y - 1 1 �l♦ U � .... .. J Y Afq O N (4 U y aoN o a ]NO �VIIO�I-IWW00 1-3 dQ E W N Z d Q � J 0)0 - LU N ft - IS O Cl) N O N N � 11 c m co h c 0 U c 0 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 Existing and Committed Surface Transportation Network Within the study area, W 1-70 Frontage Road is the primary roadway that will accommodate traffic to and from the proposed development. The secondary roadways include Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, and Tabor Street. A brief description of each roadway is provided below: W 1-70 Frontage Road is an east -west collector roadway having two through lanes (one lane in each direction) with a combination of shared and exclusive turn lanes at the intersections within the study area. W 1-70 Frontage Road provides a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Ward Road is a north -south state roadway having four through lanes (two lanes in each direction) with exclusive turn lanes at the intersection within the study area. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) categorizes the adjacent segment of Ward Road (State Highway 72) as a Non -Rural Principal Highway (NR -A) and provides a posted speed limit of 40 MPH. Van Gordon Street is a north -south local roadway having two through lanes (one lane in each direction) with shared turn lanes at the intersection within the study area. Van Gordon Street provides a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. Tabor Street is a north -south collector roadway having two through lanes (one lane in each direction) with exclusive turn lanes at the intersection within the study area. Tabor Street provides a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. The study intersection of Ward Road and W 1-70 Frontage Road is signalized. All other study intersections operate under a stop -controlled condition. A stop -controlled intersection is defined as a roadway intersection where vehicle rights-of-way are controlled by one or more "STOP" signs. No regional or specific improvements for the above described roadways are known to be planned or committed at this time. The study area roadways appear to be built to their ultimate cross-sections. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 4 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 II. Existing Traffic Conditions Morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hour traffic counts were collected at the intersections of W I- 70 Frontage Road with Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, and Tabor Street. Average daily (24-hour) traffic volumes were collected on W 1-70 Frontage Road and on Ward Road. These counts are shown on Figure 3. Traffic count data is included for reference in Appendix A. Existing signal timing parameters for W 1-70 Frontage Road and Ward Road were assumed based on the existing signal head configuration and allowable movements. Assumed timings were used throughout this study to the best extent possible in order to remain consistent with typical CDOT signal coordination plans. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 5 N N @ U O o Z (ED O r m\ , �m /aa�/S Fogel r� i O 88/99-4 f T ZE/Old �rn �r 0 C- O N T O O N N O c f f 189/89 NNV FZM/M cv� 41 1 4 r64/66 41 1 . E9/78-21, tl T ro 8E/n-4 41 T 4021/94L1–I- -"`O 9Z/L- EE/L7-,F f M N N M i to UZ`� w 0 C 0 P: m N N W � ¢ Q N 0 E 0 a T m c 0 U c 0 c O O c - O O N . 2 E E c� o w m a w a) (n � a> J (n > D • 0 , T m c 0 U c 0 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 The Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Analysis techniques, as published in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the Transportation Research Board and as incorporated into the SYNCHRO computer program, were used to analyze the study intersections for existing traffic conditions. These nationally accepted techniques allow for the determination of intersection level of service (LOS) based on the congestion and delay of each traffic movement. Level of service is a method of measurement used by transportation professionals to quantify a driver's perception of travel conditions that include travel time, number of stops, and total amount of stopped delay experienced on a roadway network. The HCM categorizes level of service into a range from "A" which indicates little, if any, vehicle delay, to "F" which indicates a level of operation considered unacceptable to most drivers. These levels of service grades with brief descriptions of the operating condition, for unsignalized and signalized intersections, are included for reference in Appendix B and have been used throughout this study. The level of service analyses results for existing conditions are summarized in Table 1. Intersection capacity worksheets developed for this study are provided in Appendix C. Table 1— Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary— Existing Traffic INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GROUPS h&AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR W 1-70 Frontage Road / Ward Road (Signalized) B (12.6) B (17.2) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Sheet (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Steel (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B B Southbound Right A A Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Sew ice (Control Delay in secly eh) Stop -Control led Intersection: Level of Sew ice Existing Traffic Analysis Results Under existing conditions, operational analysis shows that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 7 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 III. Future Traffic Conditions Without Proposed Development Background traffic is the traffic projected to be on area roadways without consideration of the proposed development. Background traffic includes traffic generated by development of vacant parcels in the area. To account for projected increases in background traffic for Years 2022 and 2040, a compounded annual growth rate was determined using traffic data provided by CDOT's Online Transportation Information System (OTIS), which anticipates a 20 -year growth rate less than one percent. Therefore, in order to provide for a conservative analysis, a growth rate of approximately two percent was applied to existing traffic volumes. This annual growth rate is also consistent with regional growth projections and the level of in -f11 development expected within the area. Pursuant to the non -committed area roadway improvements discussed in Section I, Year 2022 and Year 2040 background traffic conditions assume no roadway improvements to accommodate regional transportation demands. Year 2040 assumes existing signal timing parameters for W 1-70 Frontage Road and Ward Road with optimized intersection splits in effort to better long-term intersection performance. This assumption provides for a conservative analysis. Projected background traffic volumes and intersection geometry for Years 2022 and 2040 are shown on Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 8 N N @ U O o Z (ED O m o� /aa�/S Fogel r� i O Z6 / 69-4 fl T EE /Old Mo � N O � C- � N m O c N V (O N tlL/lL �o FLL9l 996 . 1 4 -�9/CN , 1 . 99/L8-21, tl T f 04/Sl-* 41 T Z9Zl/9181 INN LZ/L-�j NM 7E/67-* N f M N O V i T m 0 U c O c O O c - O O N . 2 a� o c� o E wa U) a� J n > D • 0 , T m 0 U c O N N @ U O o Z (ED O rr N , r n O N /aa�/S Fogel r� i O M / 66-4 fl T 84/Sly 'vrn � N M � N O C- O O O c M V OO(O 0M �f tZOI/ZOl Mrn O O N . mM� F814Z/6LEl M� 2 41 1 4 r4L/617 tl 1 S6/9Z1-2" 41 T f LS/lZ-* 41 T 9081/mz-l- oMr 6E/ Mm 09/lL-,F 5 m a w a o o (n � v o N i T m c 0 U c 0 c O O c - O O N . 2 o E c� o w 5 m a w a o o (n � a> J (n > D • 0 , T m c 0 U c 0 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 As with existing traffic conditions, the operations of study intersections were analyzed under background conditions, without the proposed development, using the SYNCHRO computer program. Background traffic level of service analysis results for Year 2022 are listed in Table 2. Year 2040 operational results are summarized in Table 3. Definitions of levels of service are given in Appendix B. Intersection capacity worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Table 2 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Background Traffic — Year 2022 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GROUPS AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR W 1-70 Frontage Road / Ward Road (Signalized) B (13.5) B (18.5) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Sheet (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Sheet (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B B Southbound Right A A Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Sew ice (Control Delay in sec/v eh) Stop -Control led Intersection: Level of Sew ice Background Traffic Analysis Results —Year 2022 Year 2022 background traffic analysis indicates that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. Unsignalized intersections within the study area operate at or better than LOS B during both AM and PM peak traffic periods. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 11 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 Table 3 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary —Background Traffic —Year 2040 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GROUPS AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR W 1-70 Frontage Road / Ward Road (Signalized) F (91.8) E (72.2) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Sheet (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Sheet (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B C Southbound Right B B Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Sew ice (Control Delay in sec/v eh) Stop -Control led Intersection: Level of Sew ice Background Traffic Analysis Results —Year 2040 By Year 2040 and without the proposed development, the study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road experiences LOS F operations during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS E operations during the PM peak traffic hour. The LOS F operation anticipated during the AM peak traffic period is attributed to the high southbound through volumes, whereas the LOS E operation anticipated during the PM peak traffic period is attributed to the eastbound and westbound left turning movements. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS C or better during the PM peak traffic hour. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 12 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study IV. Proposed Project Traffic Trip Generation June 2020 Standard traffic generation characteristics compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in their report entitled Trip Generation, 10th Edition, were applied to the proposed land use in order to estimate average daily traffic (ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour vehicle trips. A vehicle trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from a point of origin to a point of destination. The ITE land use codes 221 (Multi -Family Housing (Mid -Rise)), 820 (Shopping Center), 842 (Recreational Vehicle Sales), and 932 (High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant) were used for estimating trip generation because of their best fit to the proposed land use descriptions. As actual land uses, densities or site plans within the JMS Lake development area become more defined over time, it is expected that traffic generation characteristics considered within this study will need to be updated by more specific traffic analyses or studies to help assess if transportation improvements are needed to mitigate potential traffic impacts. Trip generation rates used in this study are presented in Table 4. Table 4 — Trip Generation Rates Key: DU —Dwelling Units. KSF —Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area. Note: All data and calculations above are subject to being rounded to nearest value. Table 5 illustrates projected average daily traffic (ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour traffic volumes likely generated by the proposed development upon build -out. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 13 TRIP GENERATION RATES 24 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ITE ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL CODE LAND USE UNIT HOUR 221 Mubi-Family Housing (Mid -Rise) DU 5.44 0.09 0.27 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 820 Shopping Center KSF 37.75 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 842 Recreational Vehicle Sales KSF 5.00 0.39 0.07 0.46 0.24 0.53 0.77 932 Sit -Down Restaurant KSF 112.18 5.47 4.47 9.94 6.06 3.71 9.77 Key: DU —Dwelling Units. KSF —Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area. Note: All data and calculations above are subject to being rounded to nearest value. Table 5 illustrates projected average daily traffic (ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour traffic volumes likely generated by the proposed development upon build -out. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 13 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 Table 5 — Trip Generation Summary ITE CODE LAND USE SIZE TOTAL TRIPS GENERATED 24 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR HOUR ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL 221 820 842 932 Mubi-Farnly Housing (Mid -Rise) Shopping Center Recreational Vehicle Sales Sit -Down Restaurant 100 DU 30.0 KSF 25.0 KSF 5.0 KSF 544 1,133 125 561 9 17 10 27 27 36 11 28 2 12 22 50 27 55 6 30 17 59 13 19 44 114 19 49 Total. 1 2,362 1 64 61 125 1 118 108 226 Note: All data and calculations above are subject to being rounded to nearest value. Upon build -out, Table 5 illustrates that the proposed development has the potential to generate approximately 2,362 daily trips with 125 of those occurring during the morning peak hour and 226 during the afternoon peak hour. Adjustments to Trip Generation Rates It is probable that the proximity of regional transportation hubs, including a Park -and -Ride bus stop and a light-rail station, could provide a reduction in vehicle trip generation for the proposed development. An exact vehicle trip reduction cannot be determined at this time, but could be as little as 10 percent. Moreover, a development of this type is not likely to attract pass -by trips from the adjacent roadway system. As such, no trip reduction was taken in this study. Trip Distribution The overall directional distribution of site -generated traffic was determined based on the location of development site within the City, proposed and existing area land uses, allowed turning movements, and available roadway network. Overall trip distribution patterns for the development are shown on Figure 6. Trip Assignment Traffic assignment is how generated and distributed vehicle trips are expected to be loaded onto the available roadway network. Applying trip distribution patterns to site -generated traffic provides the overall site -generated trip assignments shown on Figure 6. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 14 7aMs Jogsl O m o_I O 8l/Old T mm N N M M V M N tl 4 tL4/SZ -- g ssaaad � N f I I 2 9 I I 1 4 r9 /6 O t I I O I c 0 U c O c O � U) m m Z -EQ O E 75 a w U) a a> J (n > D I c 0 U c O JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 V. Future Traffic Conditions With Proposed Developments Site -generated traffic was added to background traffic projections for Years 2022 and 2040 to develop total traffic projections. For analysis purposes, it was assumed that development construction would be completed by end of Year 2022. Pursuant to area roadway improvement discussions provided in Section III, Year 2022 and Year 2040 total traffic conditions assume no roadway improvements to accommodate regional transportation demands. Roadway improvements associated with site development are expected to be limited to site access and frontage as required by the governing agency. Projected Year 2022 total traffic volumes and intersection geometry are shown in Figure 7. Figure 8 shows projected total traffic volumes and intersection geometry for Year 2040. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 16 N Z 0 U o o O O U p N E 41��N Q @ LL W (0 N � (6 O c } C D Z p O N � (ED QLL ani � K=¢Q J � O Q O 0a > /aa�/S Fogel r� i O Z6/69-4 fl T l9/OZ-+ � N N � N O N -- 8 SSdJJb' -- ♦- 1 \ O I 1 V � N I � mr tll/9 1 4 V -9l/6 laMS uoryoE) USA r" m� O O c u - O N 'k N N O N . n N m -8M96 FLL911996 E -zz/Zl ry tl 1 4 -lG/CN F -69/4E 41 1 0 o 101/901 tl T f T 41 T fi 04/9l-4 Z9Zl/9181 INN a> r�o LZ IL- Nn 7C/67-* N • M M , N 7 T c 0 U c O c O O c u - O O N . E a� m oZ E =E C7 0 o p N N ww 5 (n � a> J > (n > ) D • 0 , T c 0 U c O N N @ U O o Z (ED 16, �r O_ V /aa�/S Fogel r� i O M/66-4 fl T 99/9Z-+ � M N � M O RY r -- 8 SSdJJb' -- ♦- N I I rvn tll/9 1 4 V -9l/6 laMS uoryoE) USA r" O N O O O M V O 0 M t671/LZl M m F817Z/6LEl -zz/Zl M m r7L1614 1 4 -69/7S 41 OEl/971 tl 1 f 1 F' lZ-* 41 1 9081/mz—l- fMf N� 6E/ll� MN 09/ L -,F 0 r (pM MV V V N N N i T m 0 U c 0 c O O c u - O O N . E a� m oZ E =E C7 o 0 w p N N w 5 a) (n � a> J (n � D • 0 , T m 0 U c 0 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 VI. Project Impacts The analyses and procedures described in this study were performed in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and are based upon the worst-case conditions that occur during a typical weekday upon build -out of site development and analyzed land uses. Therefore, study intersections are likely to operate with traffic conditions better than those described within this study, which represent the peak hours of weekday operations only. Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service As with background traffic, the operations of the study intersections were analyzed under projected total traffic conditions using the SYNCHRO computer program. Total traffic level of service analysis results for Years 2022 and 2040 are summarized in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively. Definitions of levels of service are given in Appendix B. Intersection capacity worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Table 6 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Total Traffic — Year 2022 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE GROUPS W 1-70 Frontage Road / Ward Road (Signalized) B (16.1) C (22.5) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B C Southbound Right A B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Access A (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Access B (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B B Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Service (Control Delay in see/veh) Stop -Controlled Intersection: Level of Service SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 19 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 Table 7 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Total Traffic — Year 2040 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE GROUPS W 1-70 Frontage Road / Ward Road (Signalized) F (96.2) E (79.3) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B C W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left C D Southbound Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Access A (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B C W 1-70 Frontage Road / Access B (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B B Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Service (Control Delay in see/veh) Stop -Controlled Intersection: Level of Service Total Traffic Analysis Results Upon Development Build -Out Table 7 illustrates how, by Year 2040 and upon development build -out, the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road shows an overall LOS F operation during the morning peak traffic hour and LOS E operation during the afternoon peak traffic hour. The LOS F operation anticipated during the AM peak traffic period is attributed to the high southbound through volumes, whereas the LOS E operation anticipated during the PM peak traffic period is attributed to the eastbound, westbound, and southbound left turning movements. Compared to the background traffic analysis, the traffic generated by the proposed development is not expected to significantly change the operations of the study intersection. The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS B or better for the morning peak traffic hour and LOS C or better for the afternoon peak traffic hour. The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS C or better for the morning peak traffic hour and LOS D or better for the afternoon peak traffic hour. The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Access A is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS B or better for the morning peak traffic hour and LOS C or better for the afternoon peak traffic hour. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 20 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Access B is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS B or better for both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. These intersection operations are similar to background conditions. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 21 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study June 2020 LVA 1 11�a p=* I This traffic impact study addressed the capacity, geometric, and control requirements associated with the development entitled JMS Lake. This proposed mixed-use development is anticipated to consist of multi -family residential housing, retail businesses, a sit-down restaurant, and marine dealership sales accompanying a wakeboard park. The development is located to the southeast of the intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The study area examined in this analysis encompassed the W 1-70 Frontage Road intersections with Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, Tabor Street, and proposed site accesses. Analysis was conducted for critical AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour traffic operations for existing traffic conditions, Year 2022 and Year 2040 background traffic conditions, and Year 2022 and Year 2040 total traffic conditions. Under existing conditions, operational analysis shows that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. Year 2022 background traffic analysis indicates that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. Unsignalized intersections within the study area operate at or better than LOS B during both AM and PM peak traffic periods. By Year 2040 and without the proposed development, the study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road experiences LOS F operations during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS E operations during the PM peak traffic hour. The LOS F operation anticipated during the AM peak traffic period is attributed to the high southbound through volumes, whereas the LOS E operation anticipated during the PM peak traffic period is attributed to the eastbound and westbound left turning movements. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS C or better during the PM peak traffic hour. Analysis of future traffic conditions indicates that the addition of site -generated traffic is expected to contribute no significant negative impact to traffic operations for the existing and surrounding roadway system upon consideration of the roadway and intersection control improvements assumed within this analysis. With all conservative assumptions defined in this analysis, the study intersections are projected to operate at future levels of service comparable to Year 2040 background traffic conditions. Proposed site accesses have long-term operations at LOS C or better during peak traffic periods and upon build -out. SM ROCHA, LLC — Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 22 APPENDIX A Traffic Count Data Location: 1 WARD RD & 170 FRONTAGE RD AM L A 1 Traffic Data Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 rvices Inc, Peak Hour: 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (3,614) 1,876 0.91 989 (1,951) WARD RD 00 170 FRONTAGE RD 4 Cn � o (275)� to� � 0 � J L 58 (209) � 168 12 � N � 22 121 0.63 6 W 0.93 E 0.80 49 ~ S r 40 159 31 C7 1 (100) � (300) n n r C) ccoo co 0') 170 FRONTAGE RD WARD RD 1 t (3,525) 1,816 0.94 1,086 (2,128) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! 1 �0 1 � 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD WARD RD WARD RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 10 1 11 0 9 245 18 0 10 460 5 770 3,040 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 2 0 3 0 5 3 10 0 13 198 17 0 11 449 5 716 3,109 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 5 0 6 0 12 3 9 0 20 250 12 0 19 440 3 779 3,132 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 1 0 6 0 9 8 10 0 32 241 17 0 23 415 13 775 3,060 0 0 1 0 8:00 AM 0 6 10 1 12 5 20 0 1 215 0 22 17 839 3,011 0 0 0 1 8:15 AM 0 2 0 9 0 7 6 19 0 26 213 14 0 20 409 739 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 5 0 10 0 10 7 7 0 25 220 19 0 15 375 14 707 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 10 4 16 0 9 1 14 0 17 239 22 0 25 362 7 726 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 30 10 60 1 74 34 100 0 163 1,821 144 0 145 3,391 78 6,051 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour 0 12 6 31 1 40 22 58 0 99 919 68 0 84 11745 47 3,132 0 0 1 1 MON Location: 1 WARD RD & 170 FRONTAGE RD PM L A 1 Traffic Data W-MIKI-01011 Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (2,588) 1,300 0.91 1,802 (3,563) WARD RD WARD RD 170 FRONTAGE RD N W O O7 W � W o (156)� to� � J (495) � o 95 68 � N L 122 � � 13 244 0.8622 W 0.93 E 0.86 ~ r 109 206 S ==� 153 116 �n C7 0 (329) ntr (315) C) � C-0 6, N a') 170 FRONTAGE RD 00 WARD RD 1 t Rolling (2,807) 1,429 0.95 1,729 (3,429) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts Left 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD WARD RD WARD RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 13 1 14 0 38 3 33 0 12 426 25 0 17 303 8 893 3,434 0 0 1 0 4:15 PM 0 6 7 28 0 30 4 31 0 13 395 19 0 12 269 10 824 3,479 PF 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 13 2 28 0 25 3 37 0 16 415 17 0 15 313 9 893 3,472 1 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 24 3 34 0 20 2 19 0 8 396 16 0 13 280 9 824 3,452 0 1 0 0 5:00 PM 0 25 10 26 0 am 4 35 0 12 406 MM 0 23 342 j 938 3,407 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 14 3 28 0 26 0 29 0 12 360 13 0 24 304 4 817 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 11 2 16 0 31 1 41 0 8 411 15 0 20 315 2 873 2 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 8 1 12 0 26 0 23 0 8 392 18 0 23 265 3 779 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 114 29 186 0 230 17 248 0 89 3,201 139 0 147 2,391 50 6,841 3 1 1 0 Peak Hour 0 68 22 116 0 109 13 122 0 49 1,612 68 0 63 11204 33 3,479 1 1 0 0 MON Data Location: 2 VAN GORDON ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD AM L A 1 Traffic Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 rvices Inc, Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (39) 21 0.82 44 (68) VAN GORDON ST 170 FRONTAGE RD --4 o � o (203)J l tU (219) � o � L21 � 113 23 N 40=106 127 0.79 135 W 0.81 E 0 0.81 158 � ~ S r � 149 o � o (281) n 4 t r �(268) 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T �0� N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! S 1 Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD VAN GORDON ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 7 19 0 0 0 19 1 0 1 0 3 50 233 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 1 31 0 0 0 18 2 0 1 0 1 54 277 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 3 25 0 0 0 22 4 0 4 0 3 61 289 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 2 35 0 0 0 22 4 0 3 0 2 68 290 0 0 1 8:00 AM 44 19 0 0 36 3 � 0 4 94 306 0 0 8:15 AM 0 2 30 0 0 0 24 4 0 4 0 2 66 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 6 27 0 0 0 20 4 0 2 0 3 62 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 9 34 0 0 0 26 10 0 4 0 1 84 0 0 0 Count Total 0 36 245 0 0 0 187 32 0 23 0 16 539 0 0 1 Peak Hour 0 23 135 0 0 0 106 21 0 14 0 7 306 0 0 0 MON Data Location: 2 VAN GORDON ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD PM L A 1 Traffic Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 rvices Inc, Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (116) 64 0.55 51 (101) VAN GORDON ST �o o� N W 170 FRONTAGE RD o 0 00 0 I L1 �Lt° (460) 0 � ,J L 25 N �237 26 � N *= 211 o 211 236 � E o 0.89 W 0.76 E 0.83 o 0 W� 155 129 S r ° 167 0 0 313 ° ��► ° 307 n rS 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD VAN GORDON ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 7 34 0 0 0 63 0 0 5 0 8 117 423 0 0 1 4:15 PM 0 6 33 0 0 0 53 3 0 3 0 5 103 455 IF 0 0 4:30 PM 0 6 32 0 0 0 55 6 0 9 0 6 114 440 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 6 26 0 0 0 38 10 0 7 0 2 89 445 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 8 38 0 0 0 65 6 FM 0 19 0 13 149 445 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 8 27 0 0 0 34 5 0 6 0 8 88 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 7 35 0 0 0 59 5 0 2 0 11 119 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 14 26 0 0 0 33 4 0 5 0 7 89 0 0 0 Count Total 0 62 251 0 0 0 400 39 0 56 0 60 868 0 0 1 Peak Hour 0 26 129 0 0 0 211 25 0 38 0 26 455 0 0 0 MON Data Location: 3 TABOR ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD AM L A 1 Traffic W-MIKI-01011 Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (155) 76 0.73 82 (145) TABOR ST 170 FRONTAGE RD o o a') o (307)l to� � 0 � J L 67 (395) � 168 15 N 40=158 225 0.87 107 W 0.85 E 0 0.87 122 � ~ S r � 173 � (206) � � (304) n41 r 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! S 1 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD TABOR ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 3 10 0 0 0 21 12 0 11 0 5 62 333 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 4 19 0 0 0 25 7 0 12 0 4 71 395 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 1 20 0 0 0 33 16 0 12 0 5 87 421 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 3 24 0 0 0 39 17 0 23 0 7 113 419 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 4 31 0 0 0 51 14 0 21 0 423 0 0 8:15 AM 0 2 25 0 0 0 39 18 0 12 0 1 97 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 5 20 0 0 0 28 18 0 11 0 3 85 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 4 31 0 0 0 40 17 0 22 0 3 117 0 0 0 Count Total 0 26 180 0 0 0 276 119 0 124 0 31 756 0 0 0 Peak Hour 0 15 107 0 0 0 158 67 0 66 0 10 423 0 0 0 MON Data Location: 3 TABOR ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD PM L A 1 Traffic W-MIKI-01011 Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (205) 120 0.65 107 (194) 1 1 TABOR ST 170 FRONTAGE RD W iv o 00 00 0 (386)J l 0 � t (477) L 78 � 203 29 � N *=171 249 0.71196 W 0.81 E 0.83 ~ r 0 225 � S 284 � � (383) n (485) r 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! S 1 Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD TABOR ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 9 41 0 0 0 46 18 0 10 0 3 127 537 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 8 34 0 0 0 40 17 0 17 0 7 123 594 IF 0 1 4:30 PM 0 3 52 0 0 0 51 26 0 21 0 4 157 579 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 9 40 0 0 0 41 17 0 17 0 6 130 561 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 70 0 0 0 39 18 0 33 0 15 J;gmL 528 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 6 28 0 0 0 36 16 0 19 0 3 108 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 5 33 0 0 0 52 17 0 23 0 9 139 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 3 33 0 0 0 30 13 0 14 0 4 97 0 0 0 Count Total 0 52 331 0 0 0 335 142 0 154 0 51 1,065 0 0 1 Peak Hour 0 29 196 0 0 0 171 78 0 88 0 32 594 0 0 1 cl N K OCo V V LOON M NCO M LO LO LO MO N M) M NM 00- MO 0000 VCO V-qT V= CO M LD V O) O V M VV O Cl) ON= O V O (O V O N N W I N 00 COQ M0LOM0 01� V O LO LL 0 '(f)NM NCO NLO NN NNNNN M MN M 0M MM Oma U Z 0 O Of LL O O uj 0 Of 0 N d V M M L 0 N O W co O w R � m v ry w w m R (D LOLO a M H Q 000 MIS W CO O0 W MMM V LO LO V M OM M CON V V 00 LO W LO L 0 0 0 M N,3- LO=00 O) 0 o 0� 00)0M 000N= 0 GLOM 0 LO=OHO FNM M VM LO V M S 0)� V =0 p] D) 00 � Ln m0 � Ln Cn M0 -qT V L0,3- NCO 00,3- M 0I 0M = MLO M rM M LO 000)00 N=O) fO I 0( NM LO LO LO O V 000 O MO CO LO N V N0 0 M M 0 MLO f- 0N000 V V�,=0� V LO 000)0 �� W M Z � Q O N 9 � LL � O N � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F C 1- Y- F C � Q00000000000a00000000000.-- O o m o m o.-- �� O o 0 NM V Ln (O I� COO) O NM V Ln (O I� COO) O� 0000000000-0000000000— 0 (D a 0 Q a(D aQ U) a �a (7 iO iOp Np Of ILO V 00 MM—O)=10 CO COM O COLO ='qT LO M00 LO MN00 0 LO (O LO Or V 00(O MNN 0 0LO0 V O V O (O ip 0 �p ALO V N �NNM M MMM V -N� Ln W co V N Ln 0_ O O Q 76 O km2: O H O ui 0 Ofw O z O Of LL O N 0) V M M L 0 O O W co O w R � m v ry w w M O >L LO V Q H p Q M V V V CO LO M O OIC CO 000 M0 V 0 MMS =MM= W V V M 000-qT V MCO LO V V o I 0000) 0(00 V V o I N N N N LO N 0 CO N LO co N LO N N LO COT V MLD 00N OM N CO V N Ln 0)0)N NCO MO) Cl)IS 00 (O Cl) (D 00 LO 01n 000lnM ln o 0L ONN CO O CO LO o 0 N LOO LO LO 0] N 0 m N 111 p Q O N 9 � LL � O N � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F C� YM —O YM —0 C Q00000000000 a0 o00000O� - O C . O C pQ �0 a_ E00NMVLDOrWmo=00NMVLnOrW0== 00000000-0000000 _ a0 � U) aQ a �a (7 APPENDIX B Level of Service Definitions The following information can be found in the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010: Chapter 18 — Signalized Intersections and Chapter 19 — Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections. Automobile Level of Service (LOS) for Signalized Intersections Levels of service are defined to represent reasonable ranges in control delay. LOS A Describes operations with a control delay of 10s/veh or less and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. If it is due to favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. LOS B Describes operations with control delay between 10 and 20 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A. LOS C Describes operations with control delay between 20 and 35 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when progression is favorable or the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS D Describes operations with control delay between 35 and 55 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. LOS E Describes operations with control delay between 55 and 80 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. LOS F Describes operations with control delay exceeding 80 s/veh or a volume -to -capacity ratio greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Level of Service (LOS) for Unsignalized TWSC Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay (s/veh) A 0-10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F > 50 APPENDIX C Capacity Worksheets Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT R�SArS9TSAIT Lane Configurations rj rj T, rj tt IN WI tt if Traffic Volume NPb) 12 6 31 41 22 68 99 919 so 84 1746 47 Future Volume(vph) 12 6 31 41 22 68 99 919 so 84 1746 47 Sort How One) 1770 1g32 0 1770 1660 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 1 R ToPeimltled 0701 0ABC 0059 0271 Sort How pen) 1one 1632 0 1360 1660 0 110 3619 1683 606 3619 1 R Sort FlowGYTOy 34 63 76 76 Lane Group FlOw(vph) 13 41 0 46 AV 0 led 999 74 91 1SA7 61 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA pm o NA Perm pmupt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 'EO 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split ff) 240 240 240 240 120 640 640 120 640 640 Total Split CA) 240°% 240°% 240°% 240°% 120% 640°% 640°% 120°% 640°% 640°% Yellow Time ff) 30 30 30 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 At Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Total Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Green is) 8% 8% AA 8% 803 741 741 ]]3 69 69 Actuated g/CPop 009 009 009 009 "0 0 7 074 0]] 070 070 v/cPop Oil 024 038 Das 051 038 006 019 0]] 006 Control Delay 425 202 611 229 206 71 16 3A 144 10 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 425 202 611 229 206 71 16 3A 144 10 LOS D C D C C A A A B A Approach Delay 255 Bey 8A 136 Approach LOB C C A B Queue Length 6(th Q1) MMT�E 2A 14 12 128 0 9 380 0 Queue Length 96th Q1) 26 36 61 59 67 196 16 21 624 A Harder Llnk Dist NO 1 61A no 613 Tum Bay Length G) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 248 }ii 258 see 221 2621 1192 ads 2470 1127 Rebated Cap add 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap add 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 006 012 OP 024 049 038 006 019 0]] 006 Hersechon bum in Cycle LengLh.100 Actuated Cycle LengLh.100 Off ad 0(0°Da, Relemned to phase 2: Be TL and 6: Be TL, Bhtl N Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings ECist ng Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour Maximum we Date :0 ]] Wersecton Signal Delay 12b etllon LOS. B Wersetllon Capacity Ullleallon 760% ISD La1111N Sound Analysis Period pin) 15 Splits and Phases:1 Wad Food &W NO Frontage Food -♦ Yel 2 -401 a, fli;k6 7 February 2020 SynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour Intersection _IW Major1 IF Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 138 Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 127 Stage 1 - - - 127 - Movement - WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations *' T+ - Y - Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 135 106 21 14 7 Future Vol, veh/h 23 135 106 21 14 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None - - 657 None - None Storage Length - Stage 1 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvnnt Flow 25 147 115 23 15 8 Major/Minor Major1 IF Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 138 0 0 324 127 Stage 1 - - - 127 - Stage 2 - - - 197 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1446 - - 670 923 Stage 1 - - - 899 - Stage 2 - - - 836 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1446 - - 657 923 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 657 - Stage 1 - - - 882 - Stage 2 - - - 836 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 10.1 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1446 - - - 727 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - - 0.031 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 Future Vol, veh/h 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 16 107 158 67 66 10 107 158 67 66 10 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 641 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 116 172 73 72 11 Major/Minor Major1 - - 633 831 Conflicting Flow All 245 0 0 357 209 Stage 1 - - - 209 - Stage 2 - - - 148 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1321 - - 641 831 Stage 1 - - - 826 - Stage 2 - - - 880 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1321 - - 633 831 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 633 - Stage 1 - - - 816 - - Stage 2 - - - 880 - 1:1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 11.1 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1321 - - - 633 831 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - - 0.113 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 - - - 11.4 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4 0 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings EList ng Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour Lane Configurations ) February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC WBi WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations ) WI T, WI tt IN WI tt if TaXlc Volume NPb) 63 09 13 122 49 1612 so so 1204 "63 Future Volume(vph) 63 22 116 109 13 122 49 1612 so so 1204 "63 Sort FlowmW) 1770 1609 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 1Eye ToPeimltled 0516 0507 0164 0076 Sort How pen) 961 1609 0 306 3619 1683 142 3619 1Eye Sort FlowGYTOy 126 91 64 64 Lane Group FlOw(bph) 74 is 147 0 63 1762 74 63 1one 36 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA prompt NA Perm erupt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 S 6 2 1 6 0 Permitted Phases 4 S 2 2 6 6 Oeletor Phase 4 4 S S 6 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split Q) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split Q) 300 300 300 300 100 Soo Soo 100 Soo Soo Total Split CA) 250°% 250°% 250°% 250°% SeCO 667% 667% SeCO 667% 667% Yellow Tim Q) 30 30 30 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 At Fed Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust Q) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time Q) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 notal Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Greens) 182 182 to 2 182 8]b at S G S S7 820 820 expands g/CRa110 016 016 016 016 073 Obi Oso 073 Obi Obi v/cRa110 Obi 042 "a 046 Old 073 007 Oso 054 003 Control Delay 675 143 a2 226 69 160 29 Too 119 07 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 675 143 a2 226 69 160 29 Too 119 07 LOS E B F C A B A B B A Approach Delay 286 610 162 116 Approach LOB C 0 B B Queue Length 6(th Q1) 63 16 S9 ad 9 447 2 11 265 0 Queue Length 96th Q1) 99 72 161 96 2a 611 21 28 364 6 Harder Wk Dist NO 182 618 no 613 Tum Bay Length G) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 200 Got 196 407 296 2412 1099 UP 2416 1101 Reheated Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Reduotn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Started Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Ratio OW 0A 060 Oso Old 073 007 Oso 054 ON Cone 120 expands Cy„ce LengLh.120 Oflsal0 (0A, Relemnedto phase 2:NBTLand 6:SBTL Brad N Green Natural Cycle: So Control Type: expands Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings ECist ng Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour Maximum vk Date "a WerSatllon Signal Delay: P2 dtllon LO S.B Wersetllon Capacity Ullleallon N 0% ISD La1111N Pound Analysis Period pin) 15 Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Food &W NO Founded Food Y01 0 -401 102 1 06 So 1 7 February 2020 Syncho Paper SM FO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 Future Vol, veh/h 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 28 129 211 25 38 26 129 211 25 38 26 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - - 5.42 - 0 2.218 - 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 575 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 140 229 27 41 28 Major/Minor Major1 - 638 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 439 243 Stage 1 - - - 243 - Stage 2 - - - 196 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1309 - - 575 796 Stage 1 - - - 797 - Stage 2 - - - 837 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1309 - - 562 796 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 562 - Stage 1 - - - 779 - i Stage 2 - - - 837 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 11.3 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1309 - - - 638 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - - - 0.109 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.3 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 Future Vol, veh/h 29 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 32 196 171 78 88 32 196 171 78 88 32 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None Critical HdwyStg 1 None - None - - - - 5.42 160 0 0 0 3.318 0 1292 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - 809 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 213 186 85 96 35 Major/Minor Major1 ! Minor2 810 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 271 0 0 506 229 Stage 1 - - - 229 - Stage 2 - - - 277 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1292 - - 526 810 Stage 1 - - - 809 - Stage 2 - - - 770 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1292 - - 513 810 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 513 - Stage 1 - - - 789 - - Stage 2 - - - 770 - q:'1111:�9:3 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 12.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1292 - - - 513 810 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - - 0.186 0.043 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - - 13.6 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.7 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL� L Lane Configurations rj rj T, rj }} IN Traffic Volume NPb) 13 6 Be 43 2a 60 103 966 71 8 Future Volume(vph) 13 6 Be 43 2a 60 103 966 71 AV 1816 49 Sort How One) 1770 1630 0 1770 1662 0 1770 36.+9 1683 171 ToPeimltled 0699 0730 0967 0257 Sort How pen) 1302 1630 0 1360 1662 0 106 3619 1683 47� Sort FlowQSOy 36 66 76 76 Lane Group Flow(bph) 14 42 0 47 90 0 112 toe) ]] 96� Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA true NA Perm true NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 69 69 60 'E9 69 69 60 69 69 69 Minimum Split ff) 249 249 240 249 109 269 25.0 109 250 250 Total Split ff) 249 249 240 249 129 649 640 129 649 649 Total Split CA) 240% 240% 240% 240% 129% 640% 640% 120% 640% 640% Yellow Time ff) 39 39 a0 39 39 49 40 39 49 49 At Per Time is) 29 29 20 29 29 29 20 29 29 29 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total WSTIme ff) 69 69 60 69 69 69 60 69 69 69 Leatl/L>,9 Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Greens) A9 A9 A9 A9 802 7a 739 ]]2 696 696 Actuated g/CPop 099 099 099 099 "0 074 074 0]] 070 070 v/cPop Ott 024 039 Das 053 040 096 021 "a 096 Control Delay 425 199 61 4 229 229 ]3 1 A a6 169 11 Queue Delay 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total Delay 425 199 61 4 229 229 ]3 1 A a6 169 11 TO D B D C C A A A B A Approach Delay 256 Be A4 149 Approach LOB C C A B Queue Largo 6(th Q1) A 4 29 16 1A 136 0 9 416 0 Queue Largo 96th Q1) 27 36 64 61 72 208 16 22 R27 9 Harder unk Dist NO 182 61A no 613 Tum Bay Length QL) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 247 "638 258 363 220 2616 1189 464 2462 1124 Rebated Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 096 Ott Old 024 051 040 096 020 0%0 096 Horsemen bum in Cycle LengLh.100 All Actuated Cycle Largo 100 Off ad 0 (0°D6, Relemnedto phase 2:BeTLand 6:BeTL, Man N Green Nalual Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Pa11P "a Intersection Cignal Delay : to bedlonLO BB Intersection Capacity Unheated 7A o% ICO Laval N Menace Amlyss Period pin) 15 A ago pementle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Road &W 170 Frontage Road 901 4I♦03 -401 los 1 06 R7 February 2020 BynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations a' T+ - V - Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 140 110 22 15 7 Future Vol, veh/h 24 140 110 22 15 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None - - 894 None - None Storage Length - Platoon blocked, % - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 152 120 24 16 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 144 0 0 336 132 Stage 1 - - - 132 - Stage 2 - - - 204 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1438 - - 659 917 Stage 1 - - - 894 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1438 - - 646 917 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 646 - Stage 1 - - - 876 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 10.2 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1438 - - - 713 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.034 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 10.2 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 Future Vol, veh/h 16 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 17 111 164 70 69 10 111 164 70 69 10 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 630 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 121 178 76 75 11 Major/Minor Major1 824 0.013 - Conflicting Flow All 254 0 0 371 216 Stage 1 - - - 216 - Stage 2 - - - 155 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1311 - - 630 824 Stage 1 - - - 820 - Stage 2 - - - 873 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1311 - - 622 824 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 622 - Stage 1 - - - 809 - i Stage 2 - - - 873 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1:1111:1 1 0 11.3 B 1311 - - - 622 824 0.013 - - - 0.121 0.013 7.8 - - - 11.6 9.4 A B A 0 0.4 0 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL L Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPb) 22a 121 113 14 127 61 1677 71 65 1252 Mi Future Volume(vph) 71 2a 121 113 14 127 61 1677 71 65 1252 34 Sort How Ont) 1770 1628 0 1770 1611 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 ToPeimltled 0506 0495 0149 0963 Sort How pen) 943 1628 0 922 1611 0 27S 36.+9 1683 117 36.+9 Sort FlowQSOy 122 S7 64 64 Lane Group Flow (bph) 77 167 0 123 163 0 66 1 Sao 77 72 1361 7 Tum Type Perm NA Perm NA pm NA Perm truth NA Perm Protected Phases 4 S 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 S 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 S S 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 69 69 60 69 69 69 60 69 69 69 Minimum Split ff) 249 249 240 249 109 269 25.0 109 259 259 Total Split ff) 309 309 300 309 109 Soo Soo 109 Soo Soo Total Split CA) 250% 250% 250% 250% So% 65.7°% 65.7°% So% 65.7°% 65.7°% Yellow Tim ff) 39 39 30 39 39 49 40 39 49 49 At Fed Time is) 29 29 20 29 29 29 20 29 29 29 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total WS Time ff) 69 69 60 69 69 69 60 69 69 69 Leatl/L>,9 Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT BItl Green (s) 189 189 to 9 189 879 at 2 G 2 872 813 813 expands g/CRaLIo 016 016 016 016 072 053 Oso 073 053 053 v/cRaLlo 052 044 096 047 020 076 097 Das 057 093 Control Delay 675 169 915 243 63 175 31 163 125 0% Queue Delay 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total Delay 675 169 915 243 63 175 31 163 125 0% TO E B F C A B A B B A Approach Delay 295 643 165 125 Approach LOB C D B B Queue Largo 6(th Q1) 93 w7r� 9 499 3 12 291 0 Queue Largo 96th Q1) 102 32 M65 106 24 652 22 43 391 6 Harder Link Dist QI) 613 no 613 Tum Bay Length M) 90 116 46 160 120 Base CapacityNPh) r �111�61 404 276 2394 1091 163 post 1093 r U"` Beheaded Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Started Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk RaLld 0 B 036 054 033 020 076 097 Das 057 093 Hersechon armory Cycle Length. 120 expands Cycle Largo 120 Offset 0 (ODS), Relemnedtd phase 2:NBTLand 6:SBTL, Man N Green Nalual Cycle: 30 Control Type: expands Coordinated February 2020 Bynum Perot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Pa11P "5 Intersection Cignal Delay : to bedlonLO BB Intersection Capacity Ullleallon So 0% ICO Laval N SerecaE Amlyss Period pin) 15 A ago pementle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Road &W 170 Fronded Road Y01 0 -401 102 1 06 So 1 7 February 2020 BynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 Future Vol, veh/h 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 134 219 26 40 27 134 219 26 40 27 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 146 238 28 43 29 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 266 0 0 456 252 Stage 1 - - - 252 - Stage 2 - - - 204 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1298 - - 562 787 Stage 1 - - - 790 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1298 - - 549 787 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 549 - Stage 1 - - - 771 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 11.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1298 - - - 625 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - - - 0.117 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.5 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 Future Vol, veh/h 30 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 33 204 178 81 92 33 204 178 81 92 33 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 513 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 222 193 88 100 36 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 802 Conflicting Flow All 281 0 0 525 237 Stage 1 - - - 237 - Stage 2 - - - 288 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1282 - - 513 802 Stage 1 - - - 802 - Stage 2 - - - 761 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1282 - - 500 802 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 500 - Stage 1 - - - 781 - i Stage 2 - - - 761 - 1:1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 12.9 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1282 - - - 500 802 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - - 0.2 0.045 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - - 14 9.7 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.7 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2040 BL WBi WBR NdL� Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPb) to 9 47 62 "63 AV 149 1 a7 102 126 261A Future Volume oph) 1A 9 47 62 "63 AV 149 1 a7 102 126 261A 71 Sort How Ont) 1770 1630 0 1770 1660 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 To Peimltled 0540 0717 0061 0121 Sort How pen) 1006 1630 0 1"636 1660 0 114 3619 1683 225 3619 Sort FlowQSOy 61 96 76 76 Lane Group Flow oph) 20 61 0 67 131 0 162 1499 111 1W 246 M Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA true NA Perm true NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Belli ff) 240 240 240 240 100 620 620 140 650 650 Total Split CA) 240% 240% 240% 240% 100% 620% 620% 140% 650% 650% Yellow Time ff) 30 30 a0 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 At Fed Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Leadl Dead Led Lad Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Green (s) 103 103 103 103 770 661 65.1 723 627 627 Actuated g/CRaLIo 010 010 010 010 077 055 065 072 053 053 v/cRaLlo 019 029 049 051 050 055 011 046 128 098 Control Delay 436 179 633 213 21 133 a 7 90 1626 23 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 436 179 633 213 21 133 a 7 90 1626 23 TO D B D C C B A A F A Approach Delay 242 Be 142 1424 Approach LOB C C B F Queue Largo 6(th Q1) 12 6 41 OTT 44 267 7 16 -1228 0 Queue Largo 96th Q1) 34 42 at 76 M50 446 33 ad M386 1A Harder unk Dist QI) 182 61A no 613 Tum Bay Length M) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 191 361 253 392 270 2304 1067 at 2218 1020 Beheaded Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced we Rano 010 017 026 Das 095 095 0� Hersechon armory Cycle Length. 100 Actuated Cycle Largo 100 Offset SO @694), Referenatl to phase 2NBTLand 6:SBTL, Man N amen Nalual Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Maximum vk CUP 12A Intersection Cignal Delay: 91% �'edlon LO C.F Intersection Capacity Unheated 1041°% ICD Laval N Menace Amlyss Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue lstheornally lmmne. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes. A agopemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Road &W 170 Frontage Road �Ot 1" 105 1W6 So7 February 2020 CynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations a �. HCM Lane LOS ►� - B Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 203 159 32 21 11 Future Vol, veh/h 35 203 159 32 21 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None None - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 38 221 173 35 23 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 208 0 0 488 191 Stage 1 - - - 191 - Stage 2 - - - 297 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1363 - - 539 851 Stage 1 - - - 841 - Stage 2 - - - 754 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1363 - - 522 851 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 522 - Stage 1 - - - 814 - i Stage 2 - - - 754 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 11.3 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1363 - - - 602 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - - - 0.058 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 11.3 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.2 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 Future Vol, veh/h 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 25 161 237 101 99 15 161 237 101 99 15 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 504 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 175 258 110 108 16 Major/Minor Major1 IF Major2 Minor2 0.022 Conflicting Flow All 368 0 0 538 313 Stage 1 - - - 313 - Stage 2 - - - 225 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1191 - - 504 727 Stage 1 - - - 741 - Stage 2 - - - 812 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1191 - - 493 727 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 493 - Stage 1 - - - 725 - - Stage 2 - - - 812 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) EB WB S� 1 0 13.7 B 493 727 0.218 0.022 14.3 10.1 B B 0.8 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2040 BL WBi WBR Be Tran Configurations s rr r s wr r Trani Volume Npb) 174 164 4 2 20 74 Fors 102 95 1806 FNure 102 "63 P4 164 20 TToooo ifi3 74 102 96 1506 50 How One) Bartle Row WW) 1� 0 P10 1611 0 aFordse) 3639 1683 3639 ye 1663 fted 0402 0394 05a OA99 05a OA99 SortTo How Bartle Flow 749 0 P34 1611 0 99 3639 1663 99 3639 1663 Bartle Flow GYTO y 82 64 Flown Group Flow (bpb) NA 0 17Sen 21 PN 0 80 2628 111 103 1963 54 64 TLaneom Toch Type Pillerm Perm NA Perm NA pom A Perm eruptNA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 11 6 PermittedPhases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Phase 4 4 8 8 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Pr Bw11M Phase Minimum mal (s) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 S Minimum Balli ff) 24A 240 290 240 100 260 0 100 Total Belli 290 290 290 290 100 810 810 G 100 G0 810 G0 810 TotalCA Bp111 Pa 24a0 24x0 24a0 24a0 83°h 61b°0 614°0 8a0 614°0 61b°0 lo Yellow Tim ff) 20 20 30 20 20 90 20 NFFred el 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Adjust Wi ➢meTime 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) ) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Dead Lag las Dead Lag Lag DeadOpllmha'I dLed Yes Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall RamrMmla None None None None None &Max G7Max50 None GMaz CA4az LXtl Green is) 240 240 290 240 510 520 eACTx Atlualto Rano 020 020 020 020 045 062 002 060 042 045 044 064 0770 64 044 WSRolo 074 048 122 Edol 1 19 011 006 006 Control Belay 761 as 7 1864 s0 361 at7 300 1134 94 509 609 Z00 10 Delay 09 09 o0 09 09 00 00 09 02 00 Total Total Belay 761 33.] 1864 361 at 1134 94 609 2a 10 Los F C r 2 c F A B C A Approach Delay 474 Too 1070 240 LOS Approach LOS o F F c Queue largo 65th Q1) s2 Too -169 � 16 � 21 667 o Queue Fargo 95th Q1) M]8 156 HIID 191 191 W2 Al 421 Mno 36 M21 12 Distgh Ql) ITom 182 618 J 880 0 613 61a B y Le Tum Bay Langlh Ql) 90 116 46 160 120 Base _ 149 391 ID6 W9� 136 ley 2211 10f0 1W 2270 1035 tedCapacity Fee Reheated Capr&tlupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BpIIIbse Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 StoraReduce Cap eel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fato Reduced vk Rano 074 048 122 048 059 119 011 076 0%6 006 Horsemen armory Cycle Length. 120 expands Cycle Fargo 120 Offset 0 (0°h), Relemnedto phase 2:NBTLand 6:BBTL Bah N Green Nalual Cycle: 140 Control Type: expands Coordinated February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 20a0 Maximum vk CUP :122 Intersection Cignal Delay 722 �'edlon LOC. E Intersection Capacity Ullleallon 1112°% ICO Laval N CerecaH Amlyss Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically lmmna. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes. A agopemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases : 1 Wad HoaO &W 170 Fronded HoaO Y01 1021 102 1 06 So7 February 2020 CynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 Future Vol, veh/h 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 194 317 38 57 39 194 317 38 57 39 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 211 345 41 62 42 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 386 0 0 661 366 Stage 1 - - - 366 - Stage 2 - - - 295 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1172 - - 427 679 Stage 1 - - - 702 - Stage 2 - - - 755 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1172 - - 409 679 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 409 - Stage 1 - - - 673 - i Stage 2 - - - 755 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 14.4 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1172 - - - 488 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.036 - - - 0.214 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - - 14.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.8 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Major1 700 0.041 - Conflicting Flow All 406 0 0 759 Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 - - - 343 - Stage 2 - - Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j + T+ - - ►j r Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 294 257 117 132 48 Future Vol, veh/h 44 294 257 117 132 48 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 75 - - 160 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 48 320 279 127 143 52 Major/Minor Major1 700 0.041 - Conflicting Flow All 406 0 0 759 343 Stage 1 - - - 343 - Stage 2 - - - 416 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1153 - - 374 700 Stage 1 - - - 719 - Stage 2 - - - 666 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1153 - - 358 700 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 358 - Stage 1 - - - 689 - - Stage 2 - - - 666 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) February 2020 :1_1111:1 Ti 0 18.7 C 1153 - - - 358 700 0.041 - - - 0.401 0.075 8.3 - - - 21.6 10.6 A C B 0.1 1.9 0.2 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL Net Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPO) 13 6 Be 67 2a 79 103 966 96 106 1816 Future Voluyvpme(h) 13 6 Be 67 2a 79 103 966 96 106 1816 49 Bart Flow W) W 1770 1630 0 1770 1647 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 ToPeimltled 0SAO 0730 0060 0242 Bart How pen) 1174 1630 0 1360 1647 0 112 3619 1683 461 3619 Bart FlowQaOg 36 do 76 76 Lane Group Flow (bph) 14 42 0 73 111 0 112 1 Oak 104 116 1973 7 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA true NA Perm true NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permltled Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 OeletlOr Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split ff) 240 240 240 240 120 640 640 120 640 640 Total Split CA) 240°% 240°% 240°% 240°% 120% 640°% 640°% 120°% 640°% 640°% Yellow Time ff) 30 30 30 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 Al Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Jeweled Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Othruze'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Greens) 107 107 107 107 749 663 653 730 65.7 65.7 Adheredg/C Rano Oil Oil Oil Oil 076 005 066 074 005 005 v/c Rano Oil 021 050 044 054 044 Oto 027 006 006 Cower Delay 402 Ul 5 2 180 227 94 30 46 193 12 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 402 Ul 5 2 180 227 94 30 46 193 12 TO 0 B 0 B C A A A B A Approach Delay 2a6 Be 100 180 Approach LOB C C B B Queue length 60th Q1) MMT�E 46 16 16 148 6 13 448 0 Queue length 96th Q1) 26 34 do 63 73 21 2A 30 we 9 Harder The Dist NO 286 no 613 Tum Bay Faro Ql) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 213 258 382 217 2346 1076 432 2o26 1065 Bhrvallon Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Feedutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Manage Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 006 Ott 028 029 052 044 Oto 027 0%6 006 Hersechon bum in CycleFargo 100 Adhered Cycle Leng1h.100 Off ad 0(0°Da, Relemned to phase 2: Be TL and 6: Be TL, Ban N Green Nalual Cycle: 90 Cower Type: Adhered Coordinated � June 2020 BynMm Repot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Date "5 Intersection Cignal Delay : 161 etllonLOS .B Intersection Capacity Ullleallon796% ICO Laval N Menace Amlys6 Period pin) 15 A 96Npemenble volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo cores Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Hood &W 170 donate Hood 901 4I♦03 -401 los 1 06 R112, 1 Ml7 June 2020 BynMm Paper SM RO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations a �. HCM Lane LOS ►� - B Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 161 132 22 15 7 Future Vol, veh/h 24 161 132 22 15 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None None - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 175 143 24 16 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 167 0 0 382 155 Stage 1 - - - 155 - Stage 2 - - - 227 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1411 - - 620 891 Stage 1 - - - 873 - Stage 2 - - - 811 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1411 - - 608 891 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 608 - Stage 1 - - - 856 - Stage 2 - - - 811 - 1:1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 10.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1411 - - - 676 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.035 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 10.5 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.1 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 27 120 174 70 69 20 120 174 70 69 20 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 597 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 130 189 76 75 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 812 Conflicting Flow All 265 0 0 411 227 Stage 1 - - - 227 - Stage 2 - - - 184 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1299 - - 597 812 Stage 1 - - - 811 - Stage 2 - - - 848 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1299 - - 584 812 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 584 - Stage 1 - - - 794 - - Stage 2 - - - 848 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 11.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1299 - - - 584 812 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.128 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 - - - 12.1 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 0.1 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 173 Future Vo,veh/h 173 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 35 13 126 34 12 35 13 126 34 12 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1342 - 0.075 - - 0.011 - 0 0 226 0 207 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 165 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 188 38 14 137 37 13 Major/Minor Major1 - 1342 - 0.075 - - 0.011 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 226 0 372 207 Stage 1 - - - - 207 - Stage 2 - - - - 165 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1342 - 629 833 Stage 1 - - - - 828 - Stage 2 - - - - 864 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1342 - 622 833 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 622 - Stage 1 - - - - 828 - i Stage 2 - - - - 854 - i HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.7 10.8 B 666 - - 1342 - 0.075 - - 0.011 - 10.8 - - 7.7 0 B A A 0.2 0 - June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBTIW WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations TI) Traffic Vol, veh/h 167 Future Vo,veh/h 167 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 7 187 9 6 9 7 187 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # Major1 - 1381 - Minor1 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 192 0 406 0 0 - 0 - 187 - 0 0 - - 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 182 10 8 203 10 7 Major/Minor Major1 - 1381 - Minor1 0.024 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 192 0 406 187 Stage 1 - - - - 187 - Stage 2 - - - - 219 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1381 - 601 855 Stage 1 - - - - 845 - Stage 2 - - - - 817 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1381 - 597 855 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 597 - Stage 1 - - - - 845 - i Stage 2 - - - - 811 - Approach UB WB N HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 10.4 - HCM LOS B 8mi a FMW 18FMe 8Pin, 1011.11ii :1.1Mq:I.WITl:1Wllll:11 Capacity (veh/h) 679 - - 1381 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 - 7.6 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 _ - 0 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL Net L Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPO) 2a 121 166 14 159 61 1677 118 101 1252 Future Volume(vph) 71 2a 121 166 14 159 61 1677 118 101 1252 34 Bart Flowwon 7770 1628 0 1770 1606 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 1M ToPeimltled 0460 0533 0146 0062 Bart How pen) 867 1628 0 993 1606 0 270 36.+9 1683 W 36.+9 1Eye Bart FlowQJTOg 122 S7 64 64 Lane Group Flow(vph) 77 167 0 170 in 0 66 1Sao led 110 1361 W Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA pmupl NA Perm pm�pl NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 2 1 6 Permltled Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Oelector Phase 4 4 8 8 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split ff) 300 300 300 300 100 800 800 100 800 800 Total Split CA) 250°% 250°% 250°% 250°% So% 66.7% 66.7% So% 66.7% 66.7% Yellow Tim ff) 30 30 a0 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 Al Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Jeweled Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Opllmha'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Ertl Green (s) 227 227 227 227 817 75 763 Sob 7S 7S expands g/CFano 019 019 019 019 053 053 053 070 055 055 v/cRallo 0 a 0 B 091 050 022 0%2 ale 073 059 004 Cower Delay 630 145 93.1 27a 74 215 62 435 142 0% Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 630 145 93.1 27a 74 215 62 435 142 ox Los 0 B F c A c A 0 B A Approach Delay 271 635 21 163 Approach LOB C E C B Queue length 60th Mn 62 22 127 67 11 660 36 o2a 0 Queue length 96th Mn 103 32 1049 141 24 662 44 MBe 391 6 Harder The Dist QI) 132 236 no 0 613 Tum Bay Faro Ql)_ 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 173 436 206 403 250 2121 1017 160 pope 1062 Bhrvallon Cap anupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Feedutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Manage Cap anupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 093 036 0%3 047 022 0%2 ale 073 059 004 Hersechon ar Cycle Fargo 120 expands Cycle Leng1h.120 Offsa1.0 (ODS), Relemnec to phase 2:NBTLand 6:Bert Ban N Green Nalual Cycle: 30 Cower Type: expands Coordinated � June 2020 Bynchm Repot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Date 091 Intersection Cignal Delay 225 etllonLOS .0 Intersection Capacity UllleallonSOS% ICO Laval N CerecaE Analysis Period pin) 15 A 96Npemenble volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum Damon cores Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Food &W 170 Fronded Food Y01 0 -401 102 1 06 So 1 7 June 2020 CynMm Repoh SM RO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 Future Vol, veh/h 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 173 259 26 40 27 173 259 26 40 27 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 188 282 28 43 29 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 310 0 0 542 296 Stage 1 - - - 296 - Stage 2 - - - 246 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1250 - - 501 743 Stage 1 - - - 755 - Stage 2 - - - 795 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1250 - - 488 743 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 488 - Stage 1 - - - 735 - Stage 2 - - - 795 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 12.3 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1250 - - - 566 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - - - 0.129 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - - 12.3 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 Future Vol, veh/h 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 51 220 196 81 92 51 220 196 81 92 51 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 465 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 239 213 88 100 55 Major/Minor Major1� Minor2 0.041 - Conflicting Flow All 301 0 0 598 257 Stage 1 - - - 257 - Stage 2 - - - 341 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1260 - - 465 782 Stage 1 - - - 786 - Stage 2 - - - 720 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1260 - - 446 782 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 446 - Stage 1 - - - 755 - - Stage 2 - - - 720 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) :1_1111:1 1.4 0 13.5 B 1260 - - - 446 782 0.041 - - - 0.224 0.071 8 - - - 15.4 10 A C B 0.1 0.8 0.2 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 177 Future Vo,veh/h 177 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 65 24 262 59 22 65 24 262 59 22 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1301 - Minor1 - 0 0 263 0 228 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 337 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 192 71 26 285 64 24 Major/Minor Major1 - 1301 - Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 263 0 565 228 Stage 1 - - - - 228 - Stage 2 - - - - 337 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1301 - 486 811 Stage 1 - - - - 810 - Stage 2 - - - - 723 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1301 - 474 811 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 474 - Stage 1 - - - - 810 - Stage 2 - - - - 706 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.7 13.1 B 534 - - 1301 - 0.165 - - 0.02 - 13.1 - - 7.8 0 B A A 0.6 0.1 - June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 196 Future Vo,veh/h 196 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 17 12 235 16 11 17 12 235 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # WB Nth Minor1 0.4 11.2 0 0 231 0 222 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 281 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 213 18 13 255 17 12 Major/Minor Major1 WB Nth Minor1 0.4 11.2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 231 0 503 222 Stage 1 - - - - 222 - Stage 2 - - - - 281 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1337 - 528 818 Stage 1 - - - - 815 - Stage 2 - - - - 767 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1337 - 522 818 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 522 - Stage 1 - - - - 815 - i Stage 2 - - - - 759 - i HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB Nth 0 0.4 11.2 B NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT 612 - - 1337 - 0.048 - - 0.01 - 11.2 - - 7.7 0 B A A 0.2 0 - June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings L WBi WBR Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Lane Configurations AM Peak Hour -Year 2040 A --* e Id- ek— 4J- ellt r \sw 1 ✓ June 2020 BynMm Repot SM RO CHA LLC L WBi WBR NBL Net Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPO) To 9 47 do "63 106 149 1 a7 127 196 261A Future Volume(eph) 1A 9 47 do "63 106 149 1 a7 127 196 261A 71 Bart Flowm2) 1770 1630 0 1770 1660 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 ToPeimltled 0496 0717 0963 0113 Bart How pen) 924 1630 0 1"636 1660 0 117 3619 1683 210 3619 Bart FlowQJTOg 61 116 76 76 Lane Group Flow oph) 20 61 0 93 161 0 162 1499 138 168 246 M Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA true NA Perm true NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permltled Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Oelector Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split Q) 240 240 240 240 100 260 26.0 100 260 260 Total Belli Q) 240 240 240 240 100 620 620 140 660 660 Total Split CA) 240% 240% 240% 240% 100% 620% 620% 140% 660% 660% Yellow Time Q) 30 30 a 0 30 30 40 4 0 30 40 40 Al Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust Q) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time Q) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Jeweled Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Onnize'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Greens) 122 122 122 122 740 sol 63.1 715 617 617 Adheredg/C Rano Ott Ott Ott Ott 074 093 093 072 092 092 Vic Rano Ot8 026 067 060 064 067 Ota 066 130 098 Cower Delay 409 162 60.3 179 ass 149 4A 140 1619 23 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 409 162 60.3 179 ass 149 4A 140 1619 23 TO 0 B 0 B C B A B F A Approach Delay 223 167 1603 Approach LOB C C B F Queue Lenigh 60th Mn MMTTMMMT 6 46 27 14 2 -1262 0 Queue Lenigh 96th Mn "63 41 103 76 Am 461 46 64 M386 1A Harder The Dist QI) 182 26 no 613 Tum Bay Faro Mn 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 176 361 '111M 406 253 221 1026 BOB 2184 1006 BhrvaLlon Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Feedutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Manage Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced we RaLlo Oil OP 037 OW 064 067 Ota 052 130 IrILUNUUMH ary CycleFargo 100 Adhered Cycle LengLh.100 Offse1.0 (0°D6, Relemnedto phase 2:BeTLand 6:BeTL, Ban N Green Nalual Cycle: 160 Cower Type: Adhered Coordinated � June 2020 BynMm Repot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 20a0 Maximum vk Date 1 so Intersection Cignal Delay :962 tllon LOC. F Intersection Capacity Ullleallon 1N9% ICD Laval N Menace Amlys6 Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue lstheoranally lmmne. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo cycles. A 96Npemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo cycles. Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Food &W 170 donate Hood SOL 1" 105 1W6 So7 June 2020 CynMm Paper SM RO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 Future Vol, veh/h 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 38 224 181 32 21 11 224 181 32 21 11 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 0 2.218 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 507 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 243 197 35 23 12 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 232 0 0 534 215 Stage 1 - - - 215 - Stage 2 - - - 319 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1336 - - 507 825 Stage 1 - - - 821 - Stage 2 - - - 737 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1336 - - 490 825 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 490 - Stage 1 - - - 794 - i Stage 2 - - - 737 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 11.7 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1336 - - - 569 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - - - 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.2 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 Future Vol, veh/h 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 35 170 247 101 99 25 170 247 101 99 25 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 478 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 185 268 110 108 27 Major/Minor M or2 Minor2 0.038 Conflicting Flow All 378 0 0 578 323 Stage 1 - - - 323 - Stage 2 - - - 255 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1180 - - 478 718 Stage 1 - - - 734 - Stage 2 - - - 788 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1180 - - 464 718 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 464 - Stage 1 - - - 712 - - Stage 2 - - - 788 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1180 - 0.029 - 8.1 - A 14.1 B 464 718 0.232 0.038 15.1 10.2 C B 0.9 0.1 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 246 Future Vo,veh/h 246 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 35 13 179 34 12 35 13 179 34 12 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1256 - 0.089 - - 0.011 - 0 0 305 0 286 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 223 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 267 38 14 195 37 13 Major/Minor Major1 - 1256 - 0.089 - - 0.011 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 305 0 509 286 Stage 1 - - - - 286 - Stage 2 - - - - 223 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1256 - 524 753 Stage 1 - - - - 763 - Stage 2 - - - - 814 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1256 - 518 753 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 518 - Stage 1 - - - - 763 - Stage 2 - - - - 804 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.5 12 B 564 - - 1256 - 0.089 - - 0.011 - 12 - - 7.9 0 B A A 0.3 0 - June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBTIW WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations TI) Traffic Vol, veh/h 236 Future Vo,veh/h 236 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 7 265 9 6 9 7 265 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1297 - Minor1 - 0.006 - 0 0 267 0 262 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 304 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 257 10 8 288 10 7 Major/Minor Major1 - 1297 - Minor1 - 0.006 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 267 0 566 262 Stage 1 - - - - 262 - Stage 2 - - - - 304 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1297 - 486 777 Stage 1 - - - - 782 - Stage 2 - - - - 748 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1297 - 483 777 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 483 - Stage 1 - - - - 782 - Stage 2 - - - - 743 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.2 11.5 B 569 - - 1297 - 0.029 - - 0.006 - 11.5 - - 7.8 0 B A A 0.1 0 - June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2040 BL WBi WBR NBL Net Trn0 Configurations s s rr r s wr r Faire Volume Nph) 174 207 2 20 215 74 2415 149 130 Future Volume 102 "63 P4 207 20 216 74 241 Sase) ID9 130 TTwowo 50 How Battle Row WW) 0 16V8 0 3639 1683 o5e) 3639 16s3 ye fted 0o27609 o94 0394 05a OA99 05a OA99 SortTo How Battle Flow Q 649 1622 0 P34 16Vs 0 99 3639 1663 99 3639 1663 Battle Flow JTO s2 64 Flown Lane Group Flow (epM1) illPerm PNA 0 56 PNA 0 80 26NA 141 1963 54 64 Toch Type Perm NA en Perm NA pmu5 NA en Perm pm�1 NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 2 1 6 Perector 4 8 2 2 6 6 Pass DoArSwitch 4 4 8 8 6 2 2 1 6 6 Phase Bw11M Phase Minimum (s) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Split Minimum Balli ff) 240 240 290 240 100 260 0 100 250 50 2b0 Total Belli 290 290 290 290 100 810 G 81 0 100 810 810 CA Bp111 Pa 242°0 24x0 24a0 242°0 83°h 61b°0 614°0 83°0 614°0 61b°0 YTotalellow Yellow TTim ff) 30 30 30 30 30 90 30 NFPer el 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Wi➢ Adjust 00 00 00 00 00 00 Q1Time ) Total Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Dead Lag las Dead Lag Lag dLag DeadOpllmha'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes recall RTProtGre None None GMax750 G750Max GMaz CA4az LXtl Green is) 240 240 240 290 240 240 240 510 S20 520 Atlualno Ra110 ex 020 020 020 020 045 060 002 060 042 064 044 0770 044 64 Vic 002 048 144 445 059 119 016 las 103 006 006 Cower Delay 1104 as 7 3054 410 300 1134 09 1114 Z00 10 Queue Delay QualDelay 09 00 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 T018I Belay Ob 33.] 3084 410 317 1134 69 1114 2a 10 Los r C r B c r A r C A Delay Approach Oh C91 1654 m 63 2S Approach LOs E F F C Queue length 60th Mn _ s6 100 134 16 -1291 -06 627 0 Queue l Mn 1000 156 M04 1p04 229 W2 Mno 57 6] 1000 12 The Dist Ilnk Ql) ITom 182 286 � 880 613 61a B go Tum Bay Langlh Mn 90 146 116 46 160 120 BaseCapacityCap NPP) 121 391 ID6 Ws _ 136 2211 1013 i0 2270 1035 Bedroc0n Capr&tlupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Manage Cap nadir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduce Reduced vk Ra110 son 092 048 15 Obs 059 119 016 1A3 0%6 006 Cycle Fargo 120 expands Cycle Leng1h.120 Offsa1.0 (0°0), Relemnec to phase 2:NBTLand 6:Bert Man N Green Nalual Cycle: 150 Cower Type: expands Coordinated i June 2020 BynMm Perot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Maximum vk Rarlo:1 54 Intersection Cignal Delay 793 tllon LOC. E Intersection Capacity Ullleallon 1155% ICO Laval N Monaco Analysis Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue lstheoie111ally lmmna. Queue shown 6 maximum enation cycles. A 96Npemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum enation cycles. Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Food &W 170 Fronded Food Y01 1021 102 1 06 So7 June 2020 CynMm Fepoh SM RO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 Future Vol, veh/h 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 233 357 38 57 39 233 357 38 57 39 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 253 388 41 62 42 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 429 0 0 746 409 Stage 1 - - - 409 - Stage 2 - - - 337 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1130 - - 381 642 Stage 1 - - - 671 - Stage 2 - - - 723 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1130 - - 365 642 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 365 - Stage 1 - - - 642 - Stage 2 - - - 723 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 15.6 HCM LOS C Capacity (veh/h) 1130 - - - 443 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - - - 0.236 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 0 - - 15.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.9 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 Future Vol, veh/h 61 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 66 310 275 117 132 66 310 275 117 132 66 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 339 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 337 299 127 143 72 Major/Minor - - 319 Minor2 0.059 - Conflicting Flow All 426 0 0 832 363 Stage 1 - - - 363 - Stage 2 - - - 469 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1133 - - 339 682 Stage 1 - - - 704 - Stage 2 - - - 630 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1133 - - 319 682 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 319 - Stage 1 - - - 663 - - Stage 2 - - - 630 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) :1_1111:1 1.4 0 20.4 C 1133 - - - 319 682 0.059 - - - 0.45 0.105 8.4 - - - 25.2 10.9 A D B 0.2 2.2 0.4 June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 247 Future Vo,veh/h 247 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 65 24 372 59 22 65 24 372 59 22 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1220 - Minor1 - 0.021 - 0 0 339 0 304 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 456 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 268 71 26 404 64 24 Major/Minor Major1 - 1220 - Minor1 - 0.021 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 339 0 760 304 Stage 1 - - - - 304 - Stage 2 - - - - 456 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 374 736 Stage 1 - - - - 748 - Stage 2 - - - - 638 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 364 736 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 364 - Stage 1 - - - - 748 - Stage 2 - - - - 621 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.5 15.8 C 422 - - 1220 - 0.209 - - 0.021 - 15.8 - - 8 0 C A A 0.8 0.1 - June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 273 Future Vo,veh/h 273 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 17 12 329 16 11 17 12 329 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # ' Minor1 - 0.01 - 0 0 315 0 306 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 384 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 297 18 13 358 17 12 Major/Minor Major1 ' Minor1 - 0.01 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 315 0 690 306 Stage 1 - - - - 306 - Stage 2 - - - - 384 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1245 - 411 734 Stage 1 - - - - 747 - Stage 2 - - - - 688 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1245 - 406 734 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 406 - Stage 1 - - - - 747 - - Stage 2 - - - - 679 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.3 12.7 B 496 - - 1245 - 0.059 - - 0.01 - 12.7 - - 7.9 0 B A A 0.2 0 - June 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC City of �Wheat,R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29� Ave. April 14, 2020 Patrick Berrend Think Tank Studio PO Box 781 Frederick, CO 80530 Mr. Berrend: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 This letter is in regards to your application for approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A- 2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan. I have reviewed your second submittal and have the following comments. Please also refer to the redlined copies of the draft documents, Engineering comments, and comments from outside agencies. General Comments 1. Comment Responses: Please use the provided Word file of this letter to respond to the subsequent comments and provide it as part of the second submittal. 2. Water Rights: Have the ditch companies provided any responses? See response from Mile High Flood Control District below in Additional Comments. 3. Framing ofApplication: The cover letter accompanying the submittal is much improved. Thank you for your work on that document and the attention paid to the ODP criteria. 4. NOTE: Activity including equipment, accessory structures, and grading work have been observed on the property at different periods of time over the last year. The Community Development Director, Ken Johnstone, will be providing a letter under separate cover regarding the current zoning and grading activity occurring on the site. This may include ceasing activity on the site and/or acquiring a grading permit. Activity on the site outside of the scope of current zoning or active permits has the potential to threaten the viability of the zoning application. Compliance with the Director's letter and acceptance of the below comments will be required prior to the third submittal of the ODP application. ODP Document Sheet 1 5. The owner's LLC name should be after "owner" because Jefferson County will reject a document if the LLC and person's relationship to the LLC is not included. 6. In Character of Development: a. In the first paragraph, remove "as part of the Northwest Subarea Plan." This site is not specifically defined in the subarea plan as requiring transit -supportive uses. Add "given the proximity to the Wheat Ridge Ward Station." b. In the last paragraph, change "Ward Street" to "Wheat Ridge - Ward" which is the official RTD name for that station. w .ci.wheatridgexo.us 7. Remove the landscaping line from Development Standards. This will be replaced with a separate Open Space and Landscaping section (see comment #10 below). 8. Planning Area 1 chart: a. Which frontage(s) does the build -to requirement apply to? For a standard build -to requirement there is a primary frontage and secondary frontage with required percentages of building within those frontages. In MU -C TOD, 50% of the primary frontage (I-70 Frontage Road) and 30% of the secondary frontage (Ward Road) must be filled with a building. If you wish to modify these percentages in the ODP you can do so, but please include more detail on the build -to requirement. For example you could reduce the required build -to on Ward but increase the required build -to on the Frontage Road. b. The maximum height seems too high for a typical residential product with structured parking, even on a slope. If the preliminary designs don't require this height, please lower it to a more appropriate height such as 6 stories or 90'. Wheat Ridge measures building height based on the average finished grade, not from the absolute lowest to the absolute highest point (Sec. 26-123). Building height is often a point of controversy and ODPs should attempt to provide a realistic height while providing some flexibility that won't require modifications in the future. c. Remove the open space line. 9. In the Planning Area 2 chart, remove the open space line. 10. Create a new section called Open Space and Landscaping with the following copy in italics (some of which was already included in other sections of the ODP, and some is requested by the City): a. The site shall include a publicly -accessible multi -use trail connecting to the City's linear park north of the I-70 Frontage Road. (The ped trail is currently shown on PA -2 but this language allows some flexibility on final location.) b. PA -2 shall include a pond that is no less than XX acres in size. (We understand you wish to preserve the pond, and this requirement would allow it to be preserved while allowing some flexibility for filling portions or re -grading.) c. Landscape coverage for each developable lot in PA -1 and PA -2 shall be at least 15% and shall otherwise be in conformance with Section 26-502 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. d. Trees: Given the high number of mature trees on the property and this site's history as a fishing pond with agricultural zoning, a commitment to open space amenities is an essential component of this rezoning application. To that end, the ODP should include some provisions for tree protection and/or replacement. This may require an arborist to survey and asses the health of the existing trees, particularly those over 4" in caliper, if you have not already completed one. Please clarify what is meant by "Slope Protection Area" on Sheet 2. Please include proposed protections in the next revision; we're assuming you don't plan to clear-cut the site and memorializing that intent in the ODP is important for storytelling. Sheet 2 11. In the Use Chart: a. Add this note at the top: "Permitted and uses are shown in the following table. Uses not listed shall be deemed excluded." b. Remove group homes from the list; this is not a transit -supportive use nor supported in this location. c. Recreational uses are appropriate in PA -2 including parks, recreation facilities, and urban gardens. The previous comment letter was referring to remove larger institutional uses; I Case No. WZ-19-03 / Ward Road Pond ODP apologize for the lack of clarity. Recreational uses are good and in keeping with the subarea plan and outdoor recreation theme. d. The Commercial Services and Retail section should be in alphabetical order and all extra gaps should be removed. e. Fast food is acceptable as a permitted use, but the City is not supportive of drive thrus (of any type) in PA -1 due to its topography, access, and proximity to the TOD area. Add "no drive thru" as you did for the banking category. Also add a note that drive-thrus regardless of use are prohibited, on Sheet 1 in Development Standards. f For vet clinics, change "pin" to "pen." g. Why are special events including farmers markets not included in PA -1? This would be an appropriate accessory use if the building wanted to host an event or market. h. Remove extended stay lodging from the hotel line. i. Given its size and access constraints, hotels are not an appropriate use for PA -2. Remove. j. Remove Special Use and Conditional from the legend since they are not included. k. Add this note at the bottom: "The community development director has the authority to determine that a use not specifically listed should be so permitted or allowed on the basis of it being similar to a listed use, compatible in character and impact with uses in the zone district, consistent with the intent of the district, and which would not be objectionable to nearby property by reason of odor, dust, fumes, gas, noise, radiation, heat, glare, vibration, traffic generation, parking needs, outdoor storage or use, or is not hazardous to the health and safety of surrounding areas through danger of fire or explosion. The director's decision may be appealed to the board of adjustment as an interpretation request." 12. Per your discussions with the City Attorney, your access proposal for the east side (including Note 4) are appropriate at the ODP stage, but access must be formalized (including design) at time of plat and SDP for PA -2. 13. Show the linear park (by city) in the northeast corner, across the frontage road from the site. This will give City Council the context for the area and show a potential connection to the ped trail you've proposed. It needs to be clear the ped trail proposed would tie into the City's linear park infrastructure. 14. Align the break in the building with the access point as shown in redlines. It is not clear if this is a break, a proposed drive aisle, or something else. Label, and describe in the response. 15. What is the zig-zag line shown near the northern property line? Remove. 16. Add a note to/for the ditches stating they may be realigned or buried. This may not be clear to decision -makers without this extra indication. Additional comments The application was also sent on referral to other City departments and outside agencies. Attached are the comments that were received. Wheat Ridge Engineering Division: See attached letter and redlines from Jordan Jefferies, dated March 31, 2020, which includes the traffic study review. Arvada Fire Protection District: See attached redlines from Steven Parker. More detailed comments will be provide in the future when specific development plans are received for review. Colorado Department of Transportation: Comments from CDOT were not provided by the requested referral deadline. As we anticipate comments, they will be forwarded to you as soon as we Case No. WZ-19-03 / Ward Road Pond ODP receive them. Please contact CDOT directly regarding access onto Ward Road, access permits, potential roadway improvements, and their requirements for traffic studies. Working with CDOT as soon as possible is crucial to the success of the project. We understand there are potential modifications to the interchange to the southwest of the site, which may have minor impacts on final site design and public improvements in that area. Mile High Flood Control District. Brooke Seymour provided the following comment: "It does not appear that this site includes any major drainage features, so we won't have any comment on this development. However, please feel free to reach out to me if any specific drainage questions come up. Note that water rights is not within our area of expertise. (We engage water rights experts whenever the issue comes up on our own projects.)" This concludes the summary of comments. Please re -submit the ODP as one PDF file. For questions or clarification on any comments, feel free to directly contact me or Jordan Jefferies. Sincerely, Scott Cutler Planner II cc: WZ-19-03 case file Mark Jolstad Case No. WZ-19-03 / Ward Road Pond ODP City of Wheatljc PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO: Scott Cutler, Planner FROM: Jordan Jefferies, PE DATE: March 31, 2020 SUBJECT: WZ-19-03 / JMS Lake Holdings ODP I have completed Engineering review of the second submittal, received on March 23, 2020, of the JMS Lake Holdings planned mixed use development located at the southeast comer of the westbound I-70 frontage road and Ward road and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Outline Development Plan: 1. ODP2—Sketeh Plan: The accesses don't match what's shown in Figure 2 of the Traffic Impact Study. Please coordinate and show accurate access layout in all documents. 2. ODP2—Sketeh Plan: Use consistent linetypes and lineweights for building pads. The addition of a legend would be helpful. 3. ODP2 — Sketch Plan: Tract A is not shown, but it's referred to in the sheet notes. Please show Tract A in the plan for reference. 4. General: At the time of platting and site plan, the actual design of the access through adjacent Tract A must be negotiated with the owner of Tract A. Traffic Impact Study: 1. Figure 2—Site Plan: Additional access is shown in the ODP. Coordinate plans and verify that this additional access shown in the ODP is not required. 2. Page S: Is a 2% growth rate realistic for this area? Why does the growth rate deviate from the CLOT OTIS projections? 3. Figure 6—Site Development Distribution: How were the distribution percentages determined? Seems like southbound Ward should be increased and northbound Ward should be decreased. Southbound Ward to I-70 is likely to see a higher percentage of the traffic. 4. Figure 6—Site DevelopmentDistrihufion: Will these be strictly trips to/from boat shop? These appear higher than estimated trips in Table 5. Is more traffic anticipated than indicated by ITE manual? If not, trips at this entrance should more closely align Ward Road Pond ODP_Review-2 lettadoc: Public Works Engineering March 31, 2020 Page 2 with the trips in Table 5 for the boat shop. Excess trips should be distributed to the other entrance. **NOTE**: Please be sure all survey work and platting is performed on the City Datum. It is critical to ensure that the surveyor is aware of the datum requirements prior to initiating survey data collection. A Datum Conversion information sheet is provided with these comments to instruct the surveyor on how to ensure the data is collected in accordance with City requirements. FUTURE REQUIREMENTS (Specific Development Phase): 1. CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater than one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (S WMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The S WMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, ROW Construction, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the S WMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. 2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement: Prior to the issuance of any Building, Sitework, or Right -of -Way Construction Permits or the commencement of any construction activities, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) shall be executed by the project owner/developer. The project owner/developer will need to contact the Dept. of Community Development at 303.235.2846 to obtain a copy of the SIA template. Please note that an approved engineer's itemized cost estimate for the public improvements will be included in the SIA (refer to Other Requirement #3 below). SIAs are recorded at the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office with the Final Plat. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee: Upon acceptance of the Itemized Engineer's Cost Estimate, an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (ILOC) in the amount of reflecting the total amount of the approved cost estimate plus 25% (125% of the total estimate) shall be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval at the time of SIA submittal. The total amount required for the Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be determined upon approval of the cost estimate. The ILOC shall remain in force for the entire duration of the project, and the City reserves the right to request the ILOC be renewed if deemed necessary. A photocopy of both the itemized cost estimate and ILOC will be attached to the SIA and recorded at the county. Ward Road Pond ODP Review -2 lettendoc Public Works Engineering March 31, 2020 Page 3 4. Private improvements Cost Estimate & Use Tax: A cost estimate for private infrastructure improvements will be required prior to issuance of a Sitework Permit. The private improvements cost estimate shall include a breakdown of costs for all non-public "horizontal" infrastructure installed on site, including but not limited to: paving, curb & gutter, sidewalks, sanitary sewer, water mains, hydrants, lighting, private storm sewer improvements, and landscaping. Costs associated with "vertical" construction and public infrastructure should not be included. The private improvements cost estimate will be used to determine the City use tax due for this project. City use tax is due upon application for a Sitework Permit. 2 -Year Warranty Period and Guarantee for Public Improvements Upon completion of all public improvements and Final Acceptance has been granted by the City Inspector, the original Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be surrendered. At that time a 2 -year warranty period for the completed and approved public improvements shall commence. If at any time during said 2 -year Warranty Period the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Developer shall complete such work upon request. Upon commencement of the 2 -year Warranty Period, a 2nd Letter of Credit in the amount of 25% of the original itemized engineer's cost estimate shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge and be dated as to expire on the 2 -year anniversary of the Warranty Period commencement date. The City shall retain said Letter of Credit for the entire 2 -year Warranty Period. Upon completion of the 2 -year Warranty Period, the 2nd Letter of Credit shall be surrendered by the City of Wheat Ridge. 6. Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing: a. ROW Permits. Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way (ROW), the necessary Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right -of -Way Construction Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan (if applicable), Construction Control Plan and easement or ROW dedications b. Licensing. All work within the public Right -of -Way shall only be performed by a municipally -licensed contractor. 7. Sitework Permit: Prior to construction of any private infrastructure on the site, a Sitework Permit will need to be obtained from the City Building Department. Payment of the City use tax is required at the time of application for the Sitework Permit. Sitework Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study (if applicable), Construction Plans, and Construction Control Plan. Ward Road Pond ODP Review -2 lettendoc Public Works Engineering March 31, 2020 Page 4 8. Construction Control Plan: A Construction Control Plan (CCP) shall be required prior to issuance of Sitework and ROW Permits. The Construction Control Plan is a modified set of construction plans used in the field to facilitate recordation of key as -built elevations and dimensions. The CCP shall be developed by the design engineer and architect and shall be submitted to the City for review and final approval. Instructions for development of the CCP are included with this letter. 9. Pre -Construction Meeting: Prior to commencement of any construction activities the contractor shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with the city of Wheat Ridge public works at 303.235.2861. The contractor shall be responsible for contacting all applicable utility districts for this meeting. 10. Drainage Certification/ As -Built Plans/ SMA and O & M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer -of -Record shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter (DCL) stating that the overall site grading was completed per the approved Grading and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed per the approved construction plans and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The DCL shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As -Built Plans on the Current City Datum for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. b. As -Built Plans: The following items shall be included in the As -Built Plan prior to City acceptance: Storm Sewer (this info referenced in DCL) 1. Detention/WQ pond volume (sufficient spot elevations for engineer to calculate the volume). 2. Detention/WQ pond Outlet Structure elevations. 3. Manholes, rim and invert elevations. 4. Drop Inlets, grate and invert elevations ii. Lighting (within Public ROW only) 1. Streetlight locations. 2. Pedestrian light locations. 3. Pull Box locations. 4. Electric meter location(s) Three (3) copies of the "As -Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: i. One (1) hardcopy is to be signed & sealed on 24" X 36" bond paper, and Ward Road Pond ODP Review -2 lettendoc Public Works Engineering March 31, 2020 Page 5 ii. Two (2) electronic Files are to be delivered on DVD/CD-ROM as follows: 1. One (1) file in AutoCAD 2015 DWG or older format, AND 2. One (1) file in PDF format (of the signed & sealed sheets). 11. Information pertaining to the Public Works development requirements, Site Drainage Requirements, the City's Street Construction Standards & Details in AutoCAD@ DWG format, ROW maps, and City -based coordinate and land surveying information (i.e., Current City Datum), is all available on the Public Works, Development Review page of the City of Wheat Ridge website at: www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Ward Road Pond ODP Review -2 lettendoc JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMEN given its pro Ximit fl rsa,gne ¢NIOHous GARI to the rARleat Ridge EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CETT. OF - Wara bFN On. HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED THE INTENT OF THE d15 LANE HOLDropi LLD. MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT 15 FESRUAAY 4 £BB IN SOUK 1999 AT PAGE 350. TO REHABILITATE THIS FORMER GRAVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX, A POK110N OF THE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTION 24 COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SURROUNDING A PRI ARE LAKE TOWNSHIP 9 SOLI RANGE BS WEST OF THE Gth PM ARE LMEAR PARD WHICH WILL BE A VITAL ANP, UNIQUE AME OR THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COBB)H 0 RESIP,ENiS Al PATRCTIS W THIS pEVELOT-TENT AND GREATER CONTAINING 22]3 PLNEB MORE OR EE36 (E�248% BE H-1 COMMUNITY THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATONAL VmES POWERS ON THE LANE WILL SERVE TO ENHaucE THE " ARr GATEWAY" ASEEcr A RESIDENTIAL COHMW ltt IS PROPOSED FOR THE LETTER PLANNMG AREA (FAV WITH RETAIL AYIENmEs. THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRRQNT AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN COBEIRDOR5 AND WILL AL50 TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TOPOGRAPHY TO FROVIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE LOWER PENINSULA SITE IN PLANNING AREA (P42)IS FRq'OBED TO CONTAIN RETAIL, THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IB TO TAKE ADVANTAGE CF THE WATER -FRONT LOCATION Al SITE VISIBILITY FROM I -TO TO SHOWCASE WATER SPORTS THIS ACTIVITY NOPE WOULD ALSO o CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY. THE KEY PROXIMITY AND ISy� JBILFA�W THIS PHVELOPEENr TO THE 1-10, WARD ROAD, AND WARD ET STATION CORRIOORs WILL CLEAR A UNIQUE LEAEL OF VITALLY AND COMIANCIY SYNE kir THAT WILL BE FURTHER ENHANCED BY THE OoDIP LL COMPLEMENTARY aRGHITEcruRAL, LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOE-IENr OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS, CASE HISTORY WZ-19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE, 5PECIFlC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENTS F.UCH AS 51TE LAYOUT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS DOCUMENT, AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MU57 BE BUBEIRTED AND APR20VED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDCi FRIOR TO THE BJEAITTAL OF A RIGHT -CF -WAY OR BUILDINS PERMIT APPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT 017E DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING SHALL BE IN cONFO@1ANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 W THE fall RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. LA ALL Al Y35 3EF13F- TCF THE W,.�-.�� ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING BHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL FENDING 54ALL BE IN CoC FORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL BICNAE 5HALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTC-B VII OF THE WHEAT RIOCE CODE OF LAWS. BILLBOARDS ARE EROHIBTTEP, ARCHITECTURAL, SITE, ANP sTREETBEENEE DESIGN SHALL BE IN COFORHANCE WITH THE ARCHNECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN HNLIAL (ASPM) AND sTREErFAAPE OE51GN EFEN AL. OUTDOOR STORAGE: SOAr6 AND INVENTGRY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS COMPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE BEDECK] 2B iftsa STANDARDS FOR OF -STREET VEHICULAR PARKING, BICYCLE PARCMG, AND LOADING, PARCINL FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS BHOIILD BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR BIDE OF WILDINGS AND STRUCTURED PARKING IB ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL FREE-sTANpIbCi COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAT PROVIDE sUFRACE FARKING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PROPOSED USE. BICYCLE PARKING ANP VELI WLAR LOADING FOR PASSENGERS AND, As APEREFFIRIATE, MERCHANDISE, 54ALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PRIMARY ENtRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY sTR1CTdRES SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, sHIPPINa AND OTHER BIHILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCE5501i STRUCTURES, ACCESSORY STRIQUF£S SHALL BE ALLOWED. PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCE55ORY 5TRUCTURE5 54HALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY PERCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE FRIMART STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT LOT. ACCE050RY BUILDINGS BHALL BE C011PRIBED OF FORMS, MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARR_E41DECTURAL QUALITIES W THE PRIMARY B ILDING. PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMI BELONG COVERAGE real THINK TAW STUDIO, INC. 1919 sOuTH LAKE ROAP ED BOX TBI 1 IV BUILD TO 0-20PROM FROPEFZ-Y LINE MAXIMUM BWLDIMG HEIGHT 20' MIN 115' MAX l5 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 ADS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC THINK TAW STUDIO, INC. 1919 sOuTH LAKE ROAP ED BOX TBI 1 IV FRFDERICK CO BM30 OONTAW: MARK JOLSrAD weep : PATRICK ERFABo D 303-618-6663 ARCHnECt NOARB IMINIHIAM SETBACK FROM FROPERY 10' FROH EAST FROFERY LINE MAXIMI BUILDING HEIGHT CIVIL 35' MAX (3 STORIES) WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION PPL LANE W 49TH STREET F w w H ¢ w O Tn ~ Z O ¢ O c� Z Q WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA Q ¢ ¢ Q PROJECT TEAM OWNER ARCHITECT: ADS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC THINK TAW STUDIO, INC. 1919 sOuTH LAKE ROAP ED BOX TBI LANdEWPODY CO 20221 FRFDERICK CO BM30 OONTAW: MARK JOLSrAD weep : PATRICK ERFABo D 303-618-6663 ARCHnECt NOARB SUIZVE303-960-9925 OR RISING 51FREY CIVIL 3312 AI AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE cONSJLTANTs HOPE BOULDER COLORADO BO 420 E AVENUE t ROBERT J. RIIBINO PLS METTO E c0 E0501 (303) 464-9515 (303) 4 CONCEPT: CONCEPT: JOEL SERMONS, HE 303-651-6626 VICINITY MAP: SHEET INDEX: CDP1 CO VER SHEET OOP 2 LAND USE MAP 0 60' 120' 2p0 GRAPHSCALF. 1" 200'-0 OWNER'S AERnRCATE Tie fedm serab Feel or 4paIN deMboatal a(sof thereof, m ferabv Bondi that Ere pdapdrs lop 14 overreach M1areon will be de.Aloped as a Handal De eopreart In anconal Mh To NSKI resblyrow and Carol lacentered In the plan soon as may otherwise be Abroad by w. I Fee fiat ruugrme that the approved of a boonllg K Harvey De Hopmann, and Hebei of No Amine development pan, does IDN orate a :2stcn' prcpefly ANY Ves1Al prcpeM r.11ts MCA any ansa aM scone Rnsr6M B tine mobb s N Seem 20-121 M Ad Motif Potly Cook of News. Show LLC name after owner (Mark Tested State AT Ooloredc ) Be `(AMIDE, of JeHeuson ) Tie fwaong Irelvrene xas achnoNelAl befare ore the dayot_AD.20 by Whose my hard and cffbel Beal, My armn4ser expires Foran Pndk SURVEYOR'S (ROTRAER on heeby oeNry that lie sMrvz/ O, the RA rday al TINTS Lake Hughes, LLC was made bs ma or bMer my arWt auperyonn and M Ve hest of my kno sedge, hfwmaaon and bell in aoroel Bob all anybode Colorado snobies, amend dense] Aldan as aheGka TV accompan;nnU wan ewvates represents sad ,MEw 19urveyma Dean sflrewre COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERnRCATE ) BB county of Jeaermn ) I Mantas at-M1ty that He pan was batl In To office of the CESTA OIAk and Harpoon of Okfferaon Ooms at Goal CAbado, at oCkck—M on tlo �yof D,In Book MAI Repoidur No. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By Dons PLANNING COMMISSION CERRRCATION NRecom2Med for apprarel The day of Ey tine WFmt Rory PlamFg Overall (Ro pown M CEFTFCATION Append No day of By tine Mead Rlgp City Course. ATTEST Any Core Mayor CaMMI Doebpmen Di 00 THINKTANK ■■ A t u a I o annissw. WWAa..1¢A nuns. CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE U115 LANE HOLDMGS, LLC. MIXED -CBE DEVELORIEM 15 TO REHABILITATE THIS FORMER GRAVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SIIFRO.NJDING A PRIVATE LAKE AND LMEAR FARC WHICH WILL BE A VITAL AND UNIQUE AMEN1x FOR THE RESIDENTS ADD FATRCT15 OF THIS OEVEACHe MEDT AND THE GREATER COMMUNITY THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURIW ON THE LANE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRIMARY GATEWAY" ASPECT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT FROEOSES TRANSIT SUPPORTI As USES AND DENSITIES AS PART OF THE NORTHWEST S'UBaffa PLAN. A RESIDENTIAL COMMONx Is PROPOSED FOR THE OFFER PLANNMG AREA (FAV WITH RETAIL AMPERES. THE ARCAIrtEcnRE WILL FRQNT AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN COR21DOR5 AND WILL AL50 TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE 51TE TOPOGRAPHY TO FROVIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE ACRER FENINSULA SITE IN PLANNING AREA (PA2) I5 FRq'05E) TO CONTAIN RETAIL, THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IB TO TAKE ADVANTAGE CF THE WATER -FRONT LOCATION ANO SITE VISIBILITY FROM 1-10 TO SHOWCASE WATER SPORTS THIS ACTIVITY NODE WOULD ALSO SERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY. THE KEY PROXIMITY AND VISIBILLY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARD ROAD, AND WARD STREET STATION CORRIDORS WILL DEER A UNDER LEAEL OF VITALLY AND COMMUNlY SYNEREir THAT WILL BE FURTHER E1TUANC7) BY THE OAERALL COMPLEMENTARY aRGulrEcruRAL, LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY PH RELOEMENr OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WZ-19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPIU4L IN NATURE, 57ECIFlC PH RELOPMENT ELEMEN75 SUCH AS 517E LAYOUT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRE08ED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAT MU57 BE SUBMITTED AND APR20VED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDCB FRIOR TO THE BUIEF17"AL OF A RIGHT -CF -WAY OR BUILDINL FEW17 APPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKIW.a SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 OF THE WHEAT RIOBB CORE OF LAWS. ALL LAIRP&DEME , SAALL HE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 36-503 GP THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL FENDING SHALL BE IN COFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL BICNAE SHALL SE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RODE CODE OR LAWS. BILLBOARDS ARE EROHI IT ED. ARCHTECLARAL, SITE, ANP STREETBEENEE DESIGN SHALL BE IN COiFORMANCE WITH THE ARGHNECNRAL AND SITE DESMON MANUAL (ASPM) AND STREFTECAPE PE51GN MARTIAL. OJE OOR STORAGE: BOATS AND INVENTORY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS COMPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION NB &Z3.. STANDARDS FOR OF -STREET VEHICULAR DARKENS, BICYCLE PARKINS, AND LOADIFA'a, PARCING FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS Bell BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR BIDE OF BJILDI415, AND STRUCTURED PARKING 15 ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL FREE-StANpIbCi COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAT PROVIDE SURFACE FARK1fNG AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE 5PECIFIC PROPOSED USE. BICYCLE PARKIW.F ANP VEHICILAR LOADING FOR PASSENGERS AND, As APER GERIATE, MERCHANDISE, 54ALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRUCTURES SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPINS AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS 5HALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY 5MRUP"I'l 5. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOLED. PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY 57RUCTURE5 5HALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY PERCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE FRIMART STRUCTURE OR STRIMCICRE5 ON THE SUBJECT LOT. ACCE050RY PAILDING5 BHALL BE COMPRISED OF FORMS MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL QUALRIEB OF THE FRIMART BIILDIRS, PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BWLOMG DOVEEACE Td/: HINIHWI OPEN SPACE 15v. BUILD TO 0-20FROM FREFERTI LME MAXIMUM BWLDMG HEIGHT 20' MIN 115' MAX (5 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 HINIMIUI PEEN SPACE 15% MINIMUM SETBACK FROM FROPERY 10' FROM EASE FROEERY LINE MAXIMUM BWLDMG HEIGHT 35' MAX (3 STORIES) JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS & 14 n & L'/ NIGHOLA3 GARI EXCEPT THAT FORTXGN OCNVEYEO TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A GEED RECORDED FEBFUVl vet W IN DOCK 1999 AT PAGE 350. A POK110N OF THE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTOR 24 TOWNSHIP 3 BOUNI RANGE fiB WEST OF THE 5e PM COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. 517ATE OF WL014D0 CONTAINING 22M ACRES MORE OR .ESB ( 1101541 BE H- f WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION PPL LONE W 49TH STREET F w w H ¢ w O Tn ~ Z O ¢ O c� Z Q WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA Q ¢ ¢ Q PROJECT TEAM OWNER ARCHITECT: JM5 LAKE HOLDINGS, LLP THINK TAW STUDIO, NO. leis SOUTH LAKE ROAD ED BOX TBI LAKEWOOD CO 50221 FREDERICK CO BM30 CONI MARK JOLSrAD CONTACT: PATRICK BERREND 303-618-6663 ARCHITECT NCARB 303-960-9925 SURVEYOR SURVEY CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AI AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RI CONSJLTANTs BOULDER COLORADO FO AHN 420 21st AVENUE iedwo CONTACT ROBERT J. RIIBINO PLS fJr, CO E0501 (303) 464-9515 Cosph IACI: JOEL SERMONS, PE, CON 303-651-6626 VICINITY MAP: SHEET INDEX: CDP1 CO VER SHEET ODP 2 LAND USES MAP 0 60' 120' 2p0 GRAPFI1�200'-0 The heave sloni carvre s) or 4paIN desYpatel asof thereat da ferany agree that ire picpaM Map 14 doxnbel M1eraon will be de.Aopeci as a Planned Deveoposent mdatce wan me uvea, espoeeon and mrsol In aontarneci In the plan aM as may othawlse be Iepural by law. I Wren further ruugnze trat the approval of a boonllg K Mems Deielopmery and Hotel of No K Aline development plan, does nor omdd5 a :vested prcpeffy ANY Vestnd PDAUMA hunts Toy UNy ANA Are Beef J Meant B tie PAYRo s of 5x1bn 20-121 M lira Meal Potly Cala Of teas. (Mark Job,ad -U J State of Oobredo ) ) Be CWln,y be Jefferson ) The lwaprg Irisiruren[ xas an noNadged beere ne the obs of _ AD. 20 by — Wiliness my hard and cffeal deal My once 'cn expire', NMan PLUG DARVEyOR'B CERTIRCATE on heeey DEBTS that lie snrvz/ Of fie We many al JMS Lake Hoeral LLC was made bN ma or user my deet aupersonn and M Ve hest of My knoeAage, hfwmaaon and bear in aoroNance Berle all ReAmbe Colorado snob A,, amort passe] patch as a> lay IRA accerneernng wan awveRy rapre dif sad ,n VN Aumewrw Beau BRrewre COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE ) so county of Jefferson ) I lamely aTM1ty trat An plan was lied In 4e often of the Camry Clerk and Feoor@r of Jeffereon County at Gocyre CAbado, at oAcO—M on tie �dayof D,In Book MAI Respina, No — JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By Dons PLANNING COMMISSION CER RICATION fRefommeMed for apparel The day of Rline WRtCode PIBmFg Overall Chanhassen OLD CEFTFCATION Appov d To day of by tie Vaheat Rlgp (AE Counsel ATTEST As Clerk Mayor CUMMI Derebpmert IMI 00 THINKTANK ■■S t u a I o anoedue u2v:EeNry sav= U show n 2ofThe BUILDING PAD SEE NOTE 2 JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS & 14 n & u NICHOLAS GABBER$ E=EPT THAT POP IN CO KEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHNAY$ STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY A ENS IN BOOK RBB AT PAGE 9B6 A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION N,, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUSK RANGE SB WEST OF THE Sth PM COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE DB. / INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT CONTAINING PIIS AGREE MORE OR LESS (91M124838 SF Is SEE NOTE 4 JRP�G� 01'eG Q c� OVA, PLANNING AREA 1 4.86 ACRES P` Y SEE (NOTE 4 1-70 BUILDING PAD I O SEE NOTE L PEN SPACE PLANNING AREA 2 17.87 ACRES WARD POND OPGN .P NORTH SEE NOTE 4 and is The PARKING U � 0 BUILDING PAD m EL SEE NOTE 2 Th T— cn PARKING LAND SUMMARY PLANNING AREA 4G6 ACRES PLANNING AREA 2 I1.91ACRES TOTAL 51TE 22.13 ACRES PERMITTED USES ALLOWED USES PA -1 PA -2 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDING: P A55157EP LIVING FACILITY P DWELLIFS, MULTIPLE P DUELTING, M bE / UI P RESIDENTIAL GROUP HOME P Puguc,CIAD AND INSTIMUTOJAL INCLUDING: COMHUNIT BUILDINGS INDULGING LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P PARKS, OPEN &PACE AND PLADAS P PUBLIC USES AND BWLDINGS P RECREATION FACILITIES, INDOOR P URBAN GARDENS P UTILITIES. MINOR P COMMERCIAL SER/ICES AND NAIL ANIMAL DAYCARE P P BANKS AND FlNMICIAL INSTNTGNS - NO DRIVE THRU P P BARS, rAVERJs, MID NIGHT CLUBS P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P EATING ESTABLISIMENT P P FAST FOOD EATII E TsG3W1SHMEM P P MICROBREII£RY, MICRODI5TILLERY WITH TAP ROOM P P MICRO PRUIRRY, MIORODISTLLERY WITHWT TAP ROOM P P BOAT RECREATIONAL VEHICLE AND TRAILER 5ALE&, RENTALS, 1 SERVICE P PERSOJAL SERVICES P P PHOTOCOPYING AND PRIMING P P PRO)DUCE 5TA+1D& P P RECREATION FACILITIES, COPRIERCIAI P P REPAIR RENTAL AND SERVICING OF BOATS - OUTDOOR STORAGE P RETAIL SALES UP TO OPPOO GSL FOR ONE TENANT 5PACE P P URBAN GARDENS P P VETERINARY CLINGS AND HOSPITALS - NO OUTDOOR PINS P P HOBPRALIT AND ENTEMAINMEM AM STUDIOS G40 G LERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS, AND EXTENDED STAY LOWING P P 57UDICO, INCLUDINL ART, MUSIC, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RADIO P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P P ANCILLARY USE5 PA4'MG FACILITIES P P TEMPORARY USES SPECIAL EVENTS INCLUDING FESTIVALS AND FARMERS MARKET P LEGEND: P PER11itED USE Where's Tract A? NP NOT PIBO117FD URI Would be helpful to / C SPECIAL USE show this. C SPECIALCONPITILGE n SHEET NOTES: SEE NOTE ` I) FASTERS ACCESS TO THE S'IBJECT PROP RSEs ADJACEM PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACsF 8O THE RACT'A ADHERES TO EsraausHED accEss ROurEs REFER r0 TION C EASEMENT" 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDBOAPMG, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT SDP 5UBMITTAL SITE DA 9J EMERGENCY BERVIGE, INGRESS/EGRESS CNIY, Ry 4) VEHICLE ACCE55 BOUN PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT O 6m' Il0' SKETCH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE I" - 60'-O" ME THINKTANK .■ a t a a I a ercEWI uRr:EeNpn MMaz CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE U115 LANE HOLDMG5, LLC. MIXED -OBE DEVELORIENT 15 TO REHABILITATE THIS FORMER GRAVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES BOFRIXNJDINS A PRIVATE LAKE AND LMEAR HARD WHICH WILL SE A VITAL Area UNIQUE AMFEI FOR THE RESIDENTS AND FATRCTOB OF THE OEVELOEiMENT AND THE GREATER COMMUNITY THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURINa ON THE LANE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRIMARY GATEWAY" ASPECT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT F%%POSES TRANSIT SnPPORTI As USES AND DENSRIES AS PART OF THE NORTHWEST SUBAREA PLAN. A RESIDENTIAL COMMONltt IS PROPOSED FOR THE OFFER PLANNMG AREA (FAV WITH RETAIL 41MMKITIEs. THE ARCRIDEcnRF WILL FRHC%7 AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL FEDE571PREN COEIRDOR5 AND WILL AL50 TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE 51TE TOPOGRAPHY TO FROV IDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE LOVER PENINSULA SITE IN PLANNING AREA (PA2) IS FRq'OEED TO CONTAIN RETAIL, THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IB TO TAKE ADVAMASE OF THE WATER -FROM LOCATION ANO SITE V15101LI11 FROM 1-10 TO SHOWCASE WATER SPORTS THIS ACTIVITY NOPE WOULD ALSO SERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY. THE KEY PROXIMITY AND VISIBILITY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-T0, WARD ROAD, AND WARD STREET STATION CORRIDORS WILL CLEAR A UNIQUE LEAEL OF VITALITY AND FAM-11-hoY SYIJEgiY THAT WILL BE DWELLER ENHANCED BY THE OAERALL COMPLEMENTARY aRGulrEcruRAL, LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WZ-19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPIWAL IN NATERE, 57ECIFlC PH RELOPMENT ELEMEN75 SUCH AS 517E LAYOUT AND BWLDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRE55ED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN MU57 BE SUBMI77ED AND APR20VED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDCB PRIOR TO THE BU51TTAL OF A RIGHT -CF -WAY OR BUILDINL FEW17 APPLICA71014 AND ANY SUBSEQUENT 0I7E DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKING, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 OF THE WHEAT ROBE CODE OF LAWS. ALL LAIRC&PAPII , SAALL REIN CONFOpMMICE WITH SECTION 36-503 OF THE WHEAT ROSS CODE OF LAWS. ALL EMERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION :6-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL FENOINS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT ROCHE CODE OF LAWS. ALL BICAYE 51HAL1- BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OR LAWS. BILLBOARDS ARE PROHIET ED. ARCHTECLARAL, SITE, ANP STREESCAPE DESIGN SHALL BE IN COMEDRHANCE WITH THE ARCHRECN¢AL AND SITE OESIW MANUAL (ASPM) AND STREFTSCAPE DESIGN MALIAL. OUTDOOR STORAGE: BOATS AND INVENTORY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS COMPLYING WI7H WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECRON NB &Z3.. STANDARDS FOR OF-57REET VEHICULAR PARCINS,, BICYCLE FSSWUN , AND LOADIF4, PARCINL FOR MULTIUSE BUILDIN'i5 BHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR BIDE OF BJILDIN65, AND 57RUCTURED PARKINS 15 ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL FREE-StANpIbCi COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS GS MAT PROVIDE SU RACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE 5PECIFIC PROPOSED USE. 5DDALE HAWING, ANP VEHICTLAR LOADING FOR PASSENGERS AND, AS APPROPRIATE, MERCHANDISE, 54ALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY 7O THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRUCTURES SERVICE LOAPII AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPIN'.a AND Of SIMILAR FUNCTIONS 5HALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOLED. PROVIDED THAT 707AL FLOOR AREA OF ACCE550RY 57RUCTURE5 SHALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY PERCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE FERMI STRUCTURE OR STRUCNRE5 ON THE SUBJECT LOT. ACCE55abi PAULDING5 BHALL BE CO`MPRIBED OF ictal MATERIALS AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WI7H THE ARCHITECTURAL QUALRIEB OF THE FRIMART DRILDIWi, PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BUILOMG COVEEACE 10no HINIHWI OF£N SPACE 15v. BUILD TO 0-20FROM FROFERTI LME MAXIMUM BWLDMG HEIGHT ]0' MIN 115' MAX (5 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 IMINIMAI OPEN SPACE 15% MINIMUM SETBACK FROM FROFERY 1 10' FROM EAST PROPERTY LINE MAXIMUM BWLDML HEIG47 1 35' MAX (3 STORIES) JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO PROJECT TEAM OWNER ARCHITECT: JM5 LAKE HOLDINGS, LLP THINK TAW STUDIO, NO. 1919 SOUTH LAKE ROAD ED BOX TBI LAKEWOOD CO W221 FREDERICK CO BM30 CONI MARK JOLSCED CONTACT: PATRICK BEFFEND 303-618-6663 ARPLIECI NCARB 303-960-9925 SURVEYOR SURVEYKIDCIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AI AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RI CONSULTANTS BOELOER COLORADO 5O AHN 21st AVENGE UBINO CONTROL ROBERT J. RIIBINO PLS LO LONDECT: CO (303) 464-9515 CONIACI: JOEL SERMONS, F'.E, SBAM 303-651-6626 VICINITY MAP: SHEET INDEX: CDP1 CO VER SHEET OOP 2 LAND USES MAP 0 60' 120' 2p0 GRAPH200'-0 Tre syce, slrmm dcori, or ppa1N desberhared aso fsd thereof, da ferebr' agree that ire orders Nap 14 cr nhpl M1araon will be raelopes as a Panned @reblVrtart In mdatce wain the NAHE reabu-eon and MANIR s aonterned In the plan anal as may othawlse be Rour n by aw. I Wren fudhar rtcost fret the approval of a boonllg K Plamosi Daelopmerb ab Hoehn of [Hs «Aloe daelopment pan, does nor orryd15 a :voyeal property ANY Vestpl prcpeM Melts May UNy arise and aceta J Meant B tie pAybef of 5x1bn 2F-121 M ft Meal Potly Code of taws. (Mark hooted - o ) State of Oobredo ) ) Be (ODE, of Jefferson ) Tae fwaprg Instrument xas adnoNalUed hefwe ne the day of _ Ao. 20 by War ess mr, hard and oXbel deal, My avmn4s'1s expire', NMaIy Pndk SNRVEyOR'B (ARFURCATE on heeey Bell that lie snrvz/ Of He We III al JMS Lake HOlifgd, LLC was made ED ma or under my dreart aupersoon and toIRA hest of My knoMage, nfiara oo and POOR, in aoroName Birth all apfAcah§ Colorado stooled, amerR Armed patch as a> ky,le accerneernng wan awveRy repreof sad ,ham Aumewrw Beau Berewre COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS GERRRCATE ) so County of Jefferson ) I hereby cosWt that An pan was fl§d In [ire Dffce of the Carry Clerk and RnDrder of .Efereon Oomry at Gocan, CAbado, at oAcO—M on tae �yof ¢,m Book Ai RaepiM NO. JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER Ry Denis PLANNING COMMISSION CER RICATION fReformeMed for appro✓al the day of R line Wbml Rory Parana Commasm. (Ro ppe=n OLD CEFTFCATION Appprtd do day of by lie Wheat Rlgp Cit Carol ATTEST Are Clerk Mayor AUMM ry D AKbpmEpT DTA10. 00 THINKTANK ■■A t u a i o ercEXeNue uMn MMN Mbr1M JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Ali TRACTS 91Q tI& 1Z NICHOLAS GARDENS. LAND SUMMARY EXCEPT THAT PORTION CIXNEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED PLANNING AREA 416 ACRES THINK TANK FEBRUMY 2t 1B9S IN BOOK RBB AT PPC£ 986 PLANNING AREA ] IT.9T ACRES A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTION N, .■ a t u d I a TOWNSHIP S SOUTK RANGE 89 WEST OF THE Brh PM. TOTAL 51TE R'13 ACRE5 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO c� I-E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT DDNTaw9c as3s AGREE MORE OR tE89 (aao24BBa GF .�-1 AGENCY NAME: ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT .rcEtleaNn uRm MMM PlOm n AGENCY CONTACT: STEVEN PARKER -FIRE MARSHAL SEE NOTE PHONE/EMAIL: 303-403-0411/STEVEN. PARKEP@APVADAFIRE COM 4 petrlck berrentl-BrcNMc(rrab DATE: 4-6-20 petnc a hinMBnkifli 1 (phone) 303-9914948 $ This referral was reviewed for compliance with the 2012 International Fire Code (IFC 4lpbik(903-960 B5 as adopted by the City of Wheat Ridge. The Arvada Fire Protection District (AFPD) SE OTE 1 SE has the following comments regarding this plan. Written indication of compliance and/or modifications to the plans are required to be provided on the next submittal. I \� SEE NOTE 4 SEE OTE 4-7Up� These in due to lack information FDl01VT,TGE Q comments are general nature of and engineered KODiAD NOLO L� T Ar drawings. "MIMI 1LI COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED NOW AS PART OF THE CURRENT REVIEW z PROCESS: _ W YQJJ -Unless otherwise specified, all comments apply to both the construction documents pA D O : and the development plans. Q BUILDING PAD BUILDING PAD `�� lJ Q 0 PLANNING OPEN SPACE: Utilitiplan shall beshown todetermine appropnatelocations and quantityoffire SEE NOTE 2 SEE NOTE 2 5 Q hydrants � m 0 N AREA 1 = a U EC MO� gyp. ,AAA 111 -Depending on the number of residential units and commercial square footage two 4.86 ACRES III 11111111x1 separate emergency vehicle access points will be required. This will be reviewed Z cc'A L�OD� ��NpN 1x1 information is O .0�� x1 G� when sufficient provided. � 1 �JN p0�� xxxxll ..A approach and de \`A S! -Fire apparatus access shall be 26 feet wide and meet the departure FRY !L Z V L1 o ....00� OPS requirements Z U x -Dead-end fire apparatus access reads exceeding 150 feet shall have an approved 1A1x11fu — POOOppP0p00 n00 ; D.......... x AAA1 turd-around provided. U -Sprinklers will be required to be installed in multi-family structures. The commercial 1 OU.V&.p�..��111 UA1r1A11 lots may require sprinklers, which will be reviewed when sufficient information is PYA .O.O. 1xA11x provided. ..0..•� xx11 the AFPD Towelr �d and provided for review using the Pecifl lcaattiions analysis ® �9j V� PARKING} -The pnvate roads through the site shall be dedicated on the final plat as "Fire Lane x A T� and Emergency Access Easement ' or other similar language as required by the City YA- � _ nmm�nnnnnmm�nn 1 1 x of Arvada. W 1H ff x Q 0 -Approved fire apparatus access roads shall be provided during construction. Unless BE otherwise approved, the fire apparatus access roads shall consist of the first lift of �)u y pL be to �f z G) �� L� asphalt or concrete shall provided prior vertical construction. Z y, Q Q OT P�D n -Fire hydrants shall be installed and made operational to the minimum provide Y BUILDING PAD m required fire flow pnorto commencing vertical construction. W ��Y�G � SEE NOTE PLANNING U ORA,Tc w -Building construction plans can be submitted to the AFPD pnorto the completion of �% Z AREA2the development review process .Note, that if building construction plans are co submitted concurrently, the AFPD will not release approved plans or a perm it until 2 O the development review process is complete, fire apparatus access road(s) are c 17.87 ACRES PARKING J provided as approved and fire hydrants are installed and operational as required. -�� -The building permit will not be released to anyone otherthan the general contractor . vVARD POND -Complete specifications and building construction plans shall be submitted directly to the AFPD for review and approval at the same time plans are submitted to the Arvada Building Inspection Division and pnorto construction occurring. All _- construction plan applications to the AFPD shall be done through Mobile Eyes The fn developer is encouraged to contact the AFPD Fire Marshal's Office to verify plan submittal requirements and the AFPD permit fees prior to plans submittal. -For additional information regarding development requirements, visit the AFPD website at www arvadafire. com _- COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED AT THE NEXT PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT: -All comments need to be address pnorto re-submi ial. - COMMENTS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT : n SEE NOTE 3 1 Approved fire apparatus access road shall be provided during construction Unless otherwise approved, the fire apparatus access road shall consist of the first lift of asphalt or concrete shall be provided pnorto vertical construction. S� I D Cl 2. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made operational to provide the minimum GOP RE-�ITa 10 MAR-20 MP 14-11fi-19 SUMDASY required fire flow pnorto commencing vertical construction ISSUED TOR DATE 1 PCD PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT a. PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN O 60 120' SKETCH PLAN GR4PHIC SCALE I" - 60'-0" O D r 2 JOB NUMBER B-BOm TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY For JMS Lake Wheat Ridge, Colorado February 2020 Prepared for: Think Tank Studio PO Box 781 Frederick, Colorado 80350 Prepared by: SM ROCHA, LLC TRAFFIC AND TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS P�\CKc'-.a 23410 ' 02/27/2020 8703 Yates Drive, Suite 210 Westminster, Colorado 80031 (303) 458-9798 Project Engineer: Stephen Simon, EIT Engineer in Responsible Charge: Fred Lantz, PE 20-011145 JMS Lake - Traffic Impact Study February 2020 Table of Contents Page I. Introduction....................................................................................................................................1 ProjectOverview...........................................................................................................................1 StudyArea Boundaries.................................................................................................................1 SiteDescription.............................................................................................................................1 Existing and Committed Surface Transportation Network.............................................................4 II. Existing Traffic Conditions...........................................................................................................5 Existing Traffic Analysis Results...................................................................................................7 III. Future Traffic Conditions Without Proposed Development......................................................8 Background Traffic Analysis Results - Year 2022......................................................................11 Background Traffic Analysis Results - Year 2040......................................................................12 IV. Proposed Project Traffic...........................................................................................................13 TripGeneration...........................................................................................................................13 Adjustments to Trip Generation Rates........................................................................................14 TripDistribution...........................................................................................................................14 TripAssignment..........................................................................................................................14 V. Future Traffic Conditions With Proposed Developments........................................................16 VI. Project Impacts..........................................................................................................................19 Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service...................................................................................19 Total Traffic Analysis Results Upon Development Build-Out......................................................20 VII. Conclusion................................................................................................................................22 SM ROCHA, LLC- Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page i JMS Lake - Traffic Impact Study February 2020 List of Figures Page Figure1 - Location..............................................................................................................................2 - Existing Traffic.................................................7 Figure2 - Site Plan.............................................................................................................................3 Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary Figure 3 - Existing Traffic Volumes.....................................................................................................6 Table 3 - Figure 4 - Background Traffic Volumes - Year 2022..........................................................................9 Figure 5 - Background Traffic Volumes - Year 2040........................................................................10 Figure 6 - Distribution and Site Generated Assignment....................................................................15 Trip Generation Summary .................................................................................................14 Figure 7 - Total Traffic Volumes - Year 2022...................................................................................17 Table 6 - Figure 8 - Total Traffic Volumes - Year 2040...................................................................................18 List of Tables Page Table 1 - Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary - Existing Traffic.................................................7 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS Table 2 - Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary - Background Traffic - Year 2022 ....................11 Table 3 - Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary - Background Traffic - Year 2040 ....................12 Table 4 - Trip Generation Rates.......................................................................................................13 Table 5 - Trip Generation Summary .................................................................................................14 Table 6 - Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary - Total Traffic - Year 2022 ...............................19 Table 7 - Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary - Total Traffic - Year 2040 ...............................20 Appendices APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX B LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS APPENDIX C CAPACITY WORKSHEETS SM ROCHA, LLC- Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page ii JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 I. Introduction Project Overview This traffic impact study addresses the capacity, geometric, and control requirements associated with the development entitled JMS Lake. This proposed mixed-use development is anticipated to consist of multi -family residential housing, retail businesses, a sit-down restaurant, and marine dealership sales accompanying a wakeboard park. The development is located to the southeast corner of the intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Study Area Boundaries The study area to be examined in this analysis encompasses the W 1-70 Frontage Road intersections with Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, Tabor Street, and proposed site accesses. Figure 1 illustrates location of the site and study intersections. Site Description Specific land uses and densities are currently undefined. However, for purposes of this analysis the proposed development is assumed to entail the new construction of approximately 100 mid -rise residential dwelling units, up to 30,000 square feet of retail shopping uses, an approximate 5,000 square foot sit-down restaurant, and up to 25,000 square feet of aquatics related dealership and servicing sales. Densities are generally determined based upon the available buildable area multiplied by a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.2, which is considered typical for commercial oriented businesses. Land for the development is currently vacant and surrounded by a mix of commercial, light industrial, medical, and open space land uses. Proposed access to the development is provided at the following locations: one full -movement access onto W 1-70 Frontage Road between Ward Road and Van Gordon Street (referred to as Access A), and one full -movement access onto W 1-70 Frontage Road east of Van Gordon Street (referred to as Access B). For purposes of this study, it is anticipated that development construction would be completed by end of Year 2022. A conceptual site plan, as prepared by Think Tank Studio, is shown on Figure 2. This plan is provided for illustrative purposes. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 1 EINO WIOH�]Moo 1-3 N Z O M y Q N N 7 J ON d L- d LL Ri y � Ll L JMS Lake - Traffic Impact Study February 2020 Existing and Committed Surface Transportation Network Within the study area, W 1-70 Frontage Road is the primary roadway that will accommodate traffic to and from the proposed development. The secondary roadways include Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, and Tabor Street. A brief description of each roadway is provided below: W 1-70 Frontage Road is an east -west collector roadway having two through lanes (one lane in each direction) with a combination of shared and exclusive turn lanes at the intersections within the study area. W 1-70 Frontage Road provides a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. Ward Road is a north -south state roadway having four through lanes (two lanes in each direction) with exclusive turn lanes at the intersection within the study area. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) categorizes the adjacent segment of Ward Road (State Highway 72) as a Non -Rural Principal Highway (NR -A) and provides a posted speed limit of 40 MPH. Van Gordon Street is a north -south local roadway having two through lanes (one lane in each direction) with shared turn lanes at the intersection within the study area. Van Gordon Street provides a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. Tabor Street is a north -south collector roadway having two through lanes (one lane in each direction) with exclusive turn lanes at the intersection within the study area. Tabor Street provides a posted speed limit of 25 MPH. The study intersection of Ward Road and W 1-70 Frontage Road is signalized. All other study intersections operate under a stop -controlled condition. A stop -controlled intersection is defined as a roadway intersection where vehicle rights-of-way are controlled by one or more "STOP" signs. No regional or specific improvements for the above described roadways are known to be planned or committed at this time. The study area roadways appear to be built to their ultimate cross-sections. SM ROCHA, LLC- Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 4 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 II. Existing Traffic Conditions Morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) peak hour traffic counts were collected at the intersections of W I- 70 Frontage Road with Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, and Tabor Street. Average daily (24-hour) traffic volumes were collected on W 1-70 Frontage Road and on Ward Road. These counts are shown on Figure 3. Traffic count data is included for reference in Appendix A. Existing signal timing parameters for W 1-70 Frontage Road and Ward Road were assumed based on the existing signal head configuration and allowable movements. Assumed timings were used throughout this study to the best extent possible in order to remain consistent with typical CDOT signal coordination plans. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 5 v 5 C MSM � A t5e/122 � F22/13 �k4 111 4 x41/109 'SNP 12/6e� 11 T f 6/22 31/116 �`Om rn�m m m (4 526) (3]541) O m (O M t21 /26 11 1, F106/211 �^ 23/26 136/129 \�— JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa SM ROCHA, LLC Traffic and Transportation Consultants s ti U NO MO �m t67/7a 11 4 F16a/171 15/29 107 / 1961 o Not to Scale Figure 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic February 2020 Page 6 LEGEND • Study Intersection Volumes O Study Intersection Lane Geometry - Development Site JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa SM ROCHA, LLC Traffic and Transportation Consultants s ti U NO MO �m t67/7a 11 4 F16a/171 15/29 107 / 1961 o Not to Scale Figure 3 EXISTING TRAFFIC Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic February 2020 Page 6 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 The Signalized and Unsignalized Intersection Analysis techniques, as published in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) by the Transportation Research Board and as incorporated into the SYNCHRO computer program, were used to analyze the study intersections for existing traffic conditions. These nationally accepted techniques allow for the determination of intersection level of service (LOS) based on the congestion and delay of each traffic movement. Level of service is a method of measurement used by transportation professionals to quantify a driver's perception of travel conditions that include travel time, number of stops, and total amount of stopped delay experienced on a roadway network. The HCM categorizes level of service into a range from "A" which indicates little, if any, vehicle delay, to "F" which indicates a level of operation considered unacceptable to most drivers. These levels of service grades with brief descriptions of the operating condition, for unsignalized and signalized intersections, are included for reference in Appendix B and have been used throughout this study. The level of service analyses results for existing conditions are summarized in Table 1. Intersection capacity worksheets developed for this study are provided in Appendix C. Table 1— Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Existing Traffic INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GROUPS AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR W 1-70 Frontage Road /Ward Road (Signalized) B (12.6) B (17.2) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B B Southbound Right A A Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Service (Control Delay in sec/veh) Stop -Controlled Intersection: Level of Service Existing Traffic Analysis Results Under existing conditions, operational analysis shows that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 7 JMS Lake - Traffic Impact Study February 2020 III. Future Traffic Conditions Without Proposed Development Background traffic is the traffic projected to be on area roadways without consideration of the proposed development. Background traffic includes traffic generated by development of vacant parcels in the area. To account for projected increases in background traffic for Years 2022 and 2040, a compounded annual growth rate was determined using traffic data provided by CDOT's Online Transportation Information System (OTIS), which anticipates a 20 -year growth rate less than one percent. Therefore, in order to provide for a conservative analysis, a growth rate of approximately o percent was applied to existing traffic volumes. This annual growth rate is also consistent with regi al growth projections and the level of in -fill development expected within the area. Pursuant to the non -committed area roadway improvements discussed in S ction I, Year 2022 and Year 2040 background traffic conditions assume no roadway improvements t accommodate regional transportation demands. Year 2040 assumes existing signal timing parame rs for W I-70 Frontage Road and Ward Road with optimized intersection splits in effort to bett r long-term intersection performance. This assumption provides for a conservative analysis. Projected background traffic volumes and intersection geometry for Years022 and 2040 are shown on Figure 4 and Figure 5, respectively. 2% growth rate ilistic here? Why deviation from -CDOT SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 8 N 5 C N O MND t60/127 � 0 v,F23/14 x..14 I 1► 43/113 'SNP 13/71 41 T f 6/23 rr� vr 32/121 M`O� oar �m 0 m (4,705) (39,045) O o ry r� 122/26 t 1 LI, F110 /219 �^ 024/27-24' 140/134 JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa SM ROCHA, LLC Traffic and Transportation Consultants U MN MT 0 o 170/81 tl 4 F164/T7e 16/30 111 / 2041 o Not to Scale Figure 4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC -YEAR 2022 Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic February 2020 Page 9 LEGEND • Study Intersection Volumes O Study Intersection Lane Geometry - Development Site JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa SM ROCHA, LLC Traffic and Transportation Consultants U MN MT 0 o 170/81 tl 4 F164/T7e 16/30 111 / 2041 o Not to Scale Figure 4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC -YEAR 2022 Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic February 2020 Page 9 O M\ 132 / 38 �1 4 F159/317 �^ 5/39 / 194 LEGEND mN Study Intersection Volumes o�rn Nmm 187/183 Lane Geometry - F33/20 �k4 4 1 4 x82/184 'SNP 08/102 41 T f 9/33 'rmNo 47/174 VAN ATO n� M O M\ 132 / 38 �1 4 F159/317 �^ 5/39 / 194 JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa SM ROCHA, LLC Traffic and Transportation Consultants (6,790) I I I (56 310) I I I I I I I I I � U N O V� 1 m 1101 / t 4 F23712 181 /2941 o Not to Scale Figure 5 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC -YEAR 2040 Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic February 2020 Page 10 LEGEND • Study Intersection Volumes O Study Intersection Lane Geometry - Development Site JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa SM ROCHA, LLC Traffic and Transportation Consultants (6,790) I I I (56 310) I I I I I I I I I � U N O V� 1 m 1101 / t 4 F23712 181 /2941 o Not to Scale Figure 5 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC -YEAR 2040 Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic February 2020 Page 10 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 As with existing traffic conditions, the operations of study intersections were analyzed under background conditions, without the proposed development, using the SYNCHRO computer program. Background traffic level of service analysis results for Year 2022 are listed in Table 2. Year 2040 operational results are summarized in Table 3. Definitions of levels of service are given in Appendix B. Intersection capacity worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Table 2 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Background Traffic — Year 2022 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GROUPS AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR W 1-70 Frontage Road /Ward Road (Signalized) B (13.5) B (18.5) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B B Southbound Right A A Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Service (Control Delay in sec/veh) Stop -Controlled Intersection: Level of Service Background Traffic Analysis Results — Year 2022 Year 2022 background traffic analysis indicates that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. Unsignalized intersections within the study area operate at or better than LOS B during both AM and PM peak traffic periods. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 11 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 Table 3 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Background Traffic — Year 2040 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GROUPS AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR W 1-70 Frontage Road /Ward Road (Signalized) F (91.8) E (72.2) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B C Southbound Right B B Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Service (Control Delay in sec/veh) Stop -Controlled Intersection: Level of Service Background Traffic Analysis Results — Year 2040 By Year 2040 and without the proposed development, the study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road experiences LOS F operations during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS E operations during the PM peak traffic hour. The LOS F operation anticipated during the AM peak traffic period is attributed to the high southbound through volumes, whereas the LOS E operation anticipated during the PM peak traffic period is attributed to the eastbound and westbound left turning movements. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS C or better during the PM peak traffic hour. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 12 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 IV. Proposed Project Traffic Trip Generation Standard traffic generation characteristics compiled by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in their report entitled Trip Generation, 10th Edition, were applied to the proposed land use in order to estimate average daily traffic (ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour vehicle trips. A vehicle trip is defined as a one-way vehicle movement from a point of origin to a point of destination. The ITE land use codes 221 (Multi -Family Housing (Mid -Rise)), 820 (Shopping Center), 842 (Recreational Vehicle Sales), and 932 (High Turnover (Sit -Down) Restaurant) were used for estimating trip generation because of their best fit to the proposed land use descriptions. As actual land uses, densities or site plans within the JMS Lake development area become more defined over time, it is expected that traffic generation characteristics considered within this study will need to be updated by more specific traffic analyses or studies to help assess if transportation improvements are needed to mitigate potential traffic impacts. Trip generation rates used in this study are presented in Table 4. Table 4 — Trip Generation Rates Key: DU —Dwelling Units. KSF —Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area. Note: All data and calculations above are subject to being rounded to nearest value. Table 5 illustrates projected average daily traffic (ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour traffic volumes likely generated by the proposed development upon build -out. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 13 TRI P GEN ERATI ON RATES 24 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ITE HOUR ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL CODE LAND USE UNIT 221 Mubi-Family Housing (Mid -Rise) DU 5.44 0.09 0.27 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 820 Shopping Center KSF 37.75 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 842 Recreational Vehicle Sales KSF 5.00 0.39 0.07 0.46 0.24 0.53 0.77 932 Sit -Down Restaurant KSF 112.18 5.47 4.47 9.94 6.06 3.71 9.77 Key: DU —Dwelling Units. KSF —Thousand Square Feet Gross Floor Area. Note: All data and calculations above are subject to being rounded to nearest value. Table 5 illustrates projected average daily traffic (ADT), AM Peak Hour, and PM Peak Hour traffic volumes likely generated by the proposed development upon build -out. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 13 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 Table 5 — Trip Generation Summary ITE CODE LAND USE SIZE TOTAL TRIPS GENERATED 24 AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR HOUR ENTER EXIT TOTAL ENTER EXIT TOTAL 221 820 842 932 Mubi-Family Housing (Mid -Rise) Shopping Center Recreational Vehicle Sales Sit -Down Restaurant 100 DU 30.0 KSF 25.0 KSF 5.0 KSF 544 1,133 125 561 9 17 10 27 27 36 11 28 2 12 22 50 27 55 6 30 17 59 13 19 44 114 19 49 Total. 1 2,362 1 64 61 125 1 118 108 226 Note: All data and calculations above are subject to being rounded to nearest value. Upon build -out, Table 5 illustrates that the proposed development has the potential to generate approximately 2,362 daily trips with 125 of those occurring during the morning peak hour and 226 during the afternoon peak hour. Adjustments to Trip Generation Rates It is probable that the proximity of regional transportation hubs, including a Park -and -Ride bus stop and a light-rail station, could provide a reduction in vehicle trip generation for the proposed development. An exact vehicle trip reduction cannot be determined at this time, but could be as little as 10 percent. Moreover, a development of this type is not likely to attract pass -by trips from the adjacent roadway system. As such, no trip reduction was taken in this study. Trip Distribution The overall directional distribution of site -generated traffic was determined based on the location of development site within the City, proposed and existing area land uses, allowed turning movements, and available roadway network. Overall trip distribution patterns for the development are shown on Figure 6. Trip Assignment Traffic assignment is how generated and distributed vehicle trips are expected to be loaded onto the available roadway network. Applying trip distribution patterns to site -generated traffic provides the overall site -generated trip assignments shown on Figure 6. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 14 LEGEND • Study Intersection Volumes - Development Site JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa SM ROCHA, LLC Traffic and Transo 0 v L22/37 4� x21/38 v N N O F9/16 x13/24 9/17 41 35/65 N� M� 0 F22 / 40 21 / 39� O O ill these be strictly trips to/from boat op? These appear higher than estimated ps in Table 5. Is more traffic anticipated in indicated by ITE manual? If not, trips this entrance should more closely align th the trips in Table 5 for the boat shop. ;cess trips should be distributed to the ler entrance. LJ s N Not to Scale 'W Were the distribution 'centages determined? Seems a SB Ward should be reared and NB Ward should decreased due to I-70 access of SB Ward. — 9 Figure 6 SITE DEVELOPMENT DISTRIBUTION (%) : Overall SITE -GENERATED AM / PM Peak Hour February 2020 Page 15 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 V. Future Traffic Conditions With Proposed Developments Site -generated traffic was added to background traffic projections for Years 2022 and 2040 to develop total traffic projections. For analysis purposes, it was assumed that development construction would be completed by end of Year 2022. Pursuant to area roadway improvement discussions provided in Section III, Year 2022 and Year 2040 total traffic conditions assume no roadway improvements to accommodate regional transportation demands. Roadway improvements associated with site development are expected to be limited to site access and frontage as required by the governing agency. Projected Year 2022 total traffic volumes and intersection geometry are shown in Figure 7. Figure 8 shows projected total traffic volumes and intersection geometry for Year 2040. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 16 N S o M`"rn 182/164 Flo F23/14 4 4 x64 /151 'SNP 13/71 41 T f 6/23 32/121 M`O� ODM �(OT N O O OO O (5,535) j-126 / 262 i x13/24 1 ¢I 173 / 177-♦ 41 (• I UI 35/65 MN (39,870) mllyl 0 yl o I ¢I N� L122 / 26 024/27-24' ,1 4 F132/259 �^ 24/27 161/173 JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa U �rn F187/235 L70/81 x7/12 7 tl 4 F174/196 16;7/196 41 f, 25/47-24' 9/17-j,`27 k0/2201 m� Not to Scale Figure 7 TOTAL TRAFFIC - YEAR 2022 Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic SM ROCHA, LLC February 2020 Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 17 LEGEND • Study Intersection Volumes O Study Intersection Lane Geometry - Development Site JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa U �rn F187/235 L70/81 x7/12 7 tl 4 F174/196 16;7/196 41 f, 25/47-24' 9/17-j,`27 k0/2201 m� Not to Scale Figure 7 TOTAL TRAFFIC - YEAR 2022 Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic SM ROCHA, LLC February 2020 Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 17 JMS LAKE Traffic IMDa 0 0M C Nmm 1109/220 IZ F33/20 1 4 83/202 08/102� 41 T f 9/33 'rmv 47/174 v�v STN n� F179/372 r 13/24 246 / 247 41 35/65 N� M� TIS MN c "-32138 � I6 F181 /357 F265 / 329 x7/12 236 / 273 41 f 9/17 `2 rnm N (O M O� Nm 1101/117 tl 4 F247/275 32/61 0/3101 o Not to Scale Figure 8 TOTAL TRAFFIC - YEAR 2040 Volumes & Intersection Geometry AM / PM Peak Hour (ADT) : Average Daily Traffic SM ROCHA, LLC February 2020 Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 18 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 VI. Project Impacts The analyses and procedures described in this study were performed in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) and are based upon the worst-case conditions that occur during a typical weekday upon build -out of site development and analyzed land uses. Therefore, study intersections are likely to operate with traffic conditions better than those described within this study, which represent the peak hours of weekday operations only. Peak Hour Intersection Levels of Service As with background traffic, the operations of the study intersections were analyzed under projected total traffic conditions using the SYNCHRO computer program. Total traffic level of service analysis results for Years 2022 and 2040 are summarized in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively. Definitions of levels of service are given in Appendix B. Intersection capacity worksheets are provided in Appendix C. Table 6 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Total Traffic — Year 2022 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE GROUPS W 1-70 Frontage Road /Ward Road (Signalized) B (15.9) C (22.4) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left B C Southbound Right A B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Access A (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road /Access B (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B B Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Service (Control Delay in sec/veh) Stop -Controlled Intersection: Level of Service SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 19 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 Table 7 — Intersection Capacity Analysis Summary — Total Traffic — Year 2040 INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LANE GROUPS W 1-70 Frontage Road /Ward Road (Signalized) F (95.9) E (79.2) W 1-70 Frontage Road / Van Gordon Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left and Through A A Southbound Left and Right B C W 1-70 Frontage Road / Tabor Street (Stop -Controlled) Eastbound Left A A Southbound Left C D Southbound Right B B W 1-70 Frontage Road / Access A (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B C W 1-70 Frontage Road /Access B (Stop -Controlled) Westbound Left and Through A A Northbound Left and Right B B Key: Signalized Intersection: Level of Service (Control Delay in sec/veh) Stop -Controlled Intersection: Level of Service Total Traffic Analysis Results Upon Development Build -Out Table 7 illustrates how, by Year 2040 and upon development build -out, the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road shows an overall LOS F operation during the morning peak traffic hour and LOS E operation during the afternoon peak traffic hour. The LOS F operation anticipated during the AM peak traffic period is attributed to the high southbound through volumes, whereas the LOS E operation anticipated during the PM peak traffic period is attributed to the eastbound, westbound, and southbound left turning movements. Compared to the background traffic analysis, the traffic generated by the proposed development is not expected to significantly change the operations of the study intersection. The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS B or better for the morning peak traffic hour and LOS C or better for the afternoon peak traffic hour. The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS C or better for the morning peak traffic hour and LOS D or better for the afternoon peak traffic hour. The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Access A is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS B or better for the morning peak traffic hour and LOS C or better for the afternoon peak traffic hour. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 20 JMS Lake - Traffic Impact Study February 2020 The stop -controlled intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Access B is projected to have turning movement operations at LOS B or better for both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. These intersection operations are similar to background conditions. SM ROCHA, LLC- Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 21 JMS Lake — Traffic Impact Study February 2020 LVA I900M, =0I This traffic impact study addressed the capacity, geometric, and control requirements associated with the development entitled JMS Lake. This proposed mixed-use development is anticipated to consist of multi -family residential housing, retail businesses, a sit-down restaurant, and marine dealership sales accompanying a wakeboard park. The development is located to the southeast of the intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The study area examined in this analysis encompassed the W 1-70 Frontage Road intersections with Ward Road, Van Gordon Street, Tabor Street, and proposed site accesses. Analysis was conducted for critical AM Peak Hour and PM Peak Hour traffic operations for existing traffic conditions, Year 2022 and Year 2040 background traffic conditions, and Year 2022 and Year 2040 total traffic conditions. Under existing conditions, operational analysis shows that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. The unsignalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street has turn movement operations at or better than LOS B during both the morning and afternoon peak traffic hours. Year 2022 background traffic analysis indicates that the signalized intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road has overall operations at LOS B during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. Unsignalized intersections within the study area operate at or better than LOS B during both AM and PM peak traffic periods. By Year 2040 and without the proposed development, the study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Ward Road experiences LOS F operations during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS E operations during the PM peak traffic hour. The LOS F operation anticipated during the AM peak traffic period is attributed to the high southbound through volumes, whereas the LOS E operation anticipated during the PM peak traffic period is attributed to the eastbound and westbound left turning movements. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Van Gordon Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during both the AM and PM peak traffic hours. The study intersection of W 1-70 Frontage Road with Tabor Street experiences turning movement operations of LOS B or better during the AM peak traffic hour and LOS C or better during the PM peak traffic hour. Analysis of future traffic conditions indicates that the addition of site -generated traffic is expected to contribute no significant negative impact to traffic operations for the existing and surrounding roadway system upon consideration of the roadway and intersection control improvements assumed within this analysis. With all conservative assumptions defined in this analysis, the study intersections are projected to operate at future levels of service comparable to Year 2040 background traffic conditions. Proposed site accesses have long-term operations at LOS C or better during peak traffic periods and upon build -out. SM ROCHA, LLC— Traffic and Transportation Consultants Page 22 APPENDIX A Traffic Count Data Location: 1 WARD RD & 170 FRONTAGE RD AM L A 1 Traffic Data Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 rvices Inc, Peak Hour: 07:30 AM - 08:30 AM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (3,614) 1,876 0.91 989 (1,951) WARD RD 00 170 FRONTAGE RD 4 Cn � o (275)� to� � 0 � J L 58 (209) � 168 12 � N � 22 121 0.63 6 W 0.93 E 0.80 49 ~ S r 40 159 31 C7 1 (100) � (300) n n r C) ccoo co 0') 170 FRONTAGE RD WARD RD 1 t (3,525) 1,816 0.94 1,086 (2,128) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! 1 �0 1 � 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD WARD RD WARD RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 1 0 0 0 10 1 11 0 9 245 18 0 10 460 5 770 3,040 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 2 0 3 0 5 3 10 0 13 198 17 0 11 449 5 716 3,109 0 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 5 0 6 0 12 3 9 0 20 250 12 0 19 440 3 779 3,132 0 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 1 0 6 0 9 8 10 0 32 241 17 0 23 415 13 775 3,060 0 0 1 0 8:00 AM 0 6 10 1 12 5 20 0 1 215 0 22 17 839 3,011 0 0 0 1 8:15 AM 0 2 0 9 0 7 6 19 0 26 213 14 0 20 409 739 0 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 5 0 10 0 10 7 7 0 25 220 19 0 15 375 14 707 0 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 10 4 16 0 9 1 14 0 17 239 22 0 25 362 7 726 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 30 10 60 1 74 34 100 0 163 1,821 144 0 145 3,391 78 6,051 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour 0 12 6 31 1 40 22 58 0 99 919 68 0 84 11745 47 3,132 0 0 1 1 MON Location: 1 WARD RD & 170 FRONTAGE RD PM L A 1 Traffic Data W-MIKI-01011 Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (2,588) 1,300 0.91 1,802 (3,563) WARD RD WARD RD 170 FRONTAGE RD N W O O7 W � W o (156)� to� � J (495) � o 95 68 � N L 122 � � 13 244 0.8622 W 0.93 E 0.86 ~ r 109 206 S ==� 153 116 �n C7 0 (329) ntr (315) C) � C-0 6, N a') 170 FRONTAGE RD 00 WARD RD 1 t Rolling (2,807) 1,429 0.95 1,729 (3,429) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts Left 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD WARD RD WARD RD Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 13 1 14 0 38 3 33 0 12 426 25 0 17 303 8 893 3,434 0 0 1 0 4:15 PM 0 6 7 28 0 30 4 31 0 13 395 19 0 12 269 10 824 3,479 PF 0 0 0 4:30 PM 0 13 2 28 0 25 3 37 0 16 415 17 0 15 313 9 893 3,472 1 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 24 3 34 0 20 2 19 0 8 396 16 0 13 280 9 824 3,452 0 1 0 0 5:00 PM 0 25 10 26 0 am 4 35 0 12 406 MM 0 23 342 j 938 3,407 0 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 14 3 28 0 26 0 29 0 12 360 13 0 24 304 4 817 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 11 2 16 0 31 1 41 0 8 411 15 0 20 315 2 873 2 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 8 1 12 0 26 0 23 0 8 392 18 0 23 265 3 779 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 114 29 186 0 230 17 248 0 89 3,201 139 0 147 2,391 50 6,841 3 1 1 0 Peak Hour 0 68 22 116 0 109 13 122 0 49 1,612 68 0 63 11204 33 3,479 1 1 0 0 MON Data Location: 2 VAN GORDON ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD AM L A 1 Traffic Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 rvices Inc, Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (39) 21 0.82 44 (68) VAN GORDON ST 170 FRONTAGE RD --4 o � o (203)J l tU (219) � o � L21 � 113 23 N 40=106 127 0.79 135 W 0.81 E 0 0.81 158 � ~ S r � 149 o � o (281) n 4 t r �(268) 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T �0� N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! S 1 Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD VAN GORDON ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 7 19 0 0 0 19 1 0 1 0 3 50 233 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 1 31 0 0 0 18 2 0 1 0 1 54 277 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 3 25 0 0 0 22 4 0 4 0 3 61 289 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 2 35 0 0 0 22 4 0 3 0 2 68 290 0 0 1 8:00 AM 44 19 0 0 36 3 � 0 4 94 306 0 0 8:15 AM 0 2 30 0 0 0 24 4 0 4 0 2 66 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 6 27 0 0 0 20 4 0 2 0 3 62 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 9 34 0 0 0 26 10 0 4 0 1 84 0 0 0 Count Total 0 36 245 0 0 0 187 32 0 23 0 16 539 0 0 1 Peak Hour 0 23 135 0 0 0 106 21 0 14 0 7 306 0 0 0 MON Data Location: 2 VAN GORDON ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD PM L A 1 Traffic Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 rvices Inc, Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (116) 64 0.55 51 (101) VAN GORDON ST �o o� N W 170 FRONTAGE RD o 0 00 0 I L1 �Lt° (460) 0 � ,J L 25 N �237 26 � N *= 211 o 211 236 � E o 0.89 W 0.76 E 0.83 o 0 W� 155 129 S r ° 167 0 0 313 ° ��► ° 307 n rS 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD VAN GORDON ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 7 34 0 0 0 63 0 0 5 0 8 117 423 0 0 1 4:15 PM 0 6 33 0 0 0 53 3 0 3 0 5 103 455 IF 0 0 4:30 PM 0 6 32 0 0 0 55 6 0 9 0 6 114 440 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 6 26 0 0 0 38 10 0 7 0 2 89 445 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 8 38 0 0 0 65 6 FM 0 19 0 13 149 445 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 8 27 0 0 0 34 5 0 6 0 8 88 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 7 35 0 0 0 59 5 0 2 0 11 119 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 14 26 0 0 0 33 4 0 5 0 7 89 0 0 0 Count Total 0 62 251 0 0 0 400 39 0 56 0 60 868 0 0 1 Peak Hour 0 26 129 0 0 0 211 25 0 38 0 26 455 0 0 0 MON Data Location: 3 TABOR ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD AM L A 1 Traffic W-MIKI-01011 Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 Peak Hour: 08:00 AM - 09:00 AM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 08:00 AM - 08:15 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (155) 76 0.73 82 (145) TABOR ST 170 FRONTAGE RD o o a') o (307)l to� � 0 � J L 67 (395) � 168 15 N 40=158 225 0.87 107 W 0.85 E 0 0.87 122 � ~ S r � 173 � (206) � � (304) n41 r 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! S 1 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD TABOR ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 3 10 0 0 0 21 12 0 11 0 5 62 333 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 4 19 0 0 0 25 7 0 12 0 4 71 395 0 0 0 7:30 AM 0 1 20 0 0 0 33 16 0 12 0 5 87 421 0 0 0 7:45 AM 0 3 24 0 0 0 39 17 0 23 0 7 113 419 0 0 0 8:00 AM 0 4 31 0 0 0 51 14 0 21 0 423 0 0 8:15 AM 0 2 25 0 0 0 39 18 0 12 0 1 97 0 0 0 8:30 AM 0 5 20 0 0 0 28 18 0 11 0 3 85 0 0 0 8:45 AM 0 4 31 0 0 0 40 17 0 22 0 3 117 0 0 0 Count Total 0 26 180 0 0 0 276 119 0 124 0 31 756 0 0 0 Peak Hour 0 15 107 0 0 0 158 67 0 66 0 10 423 0 0 0 MON Data Location: 3 TABOR ST & 170 FRONTAGE RD PM L A 1 Traffic W-MIKI-01011 Date: Thursday, February 20, 2020 Peak Hour: 04:15 PM - 05:15 PM (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Peak 15 -Minutes: 05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (205) 120 0.65 107 (194) 1 1 TABOR ST 170 FRONTAGE RD W iv o 00 00 0 (386)J l 0 � t (477) L 78 � 203 29 � N *=171 249 0.71196 W 0.81 E 0.83 ~ r 0 225 � S 284 � � (383) n (485) r 170 FRONTAGE RD 1 T N t 0 0 CD W -X (3W o 0 0 ! S 1 Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 170 FRONTAGE RD 170 FRONTAGE RD TABOR ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrian Crossings Start Time U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 9 41 0 0 0 46 18 0 10 0 3 127 537 0 0 0 4:15 PM 0 8 34 0 0 0 40 17 0 17 0 7 123 594 IF 0 1 4:30 PM 0 3 52 0 0 0 51 26 0 21 0 4 157 579 0 0 0 4:45 PM 0 9 40 0 0 0 41 17 0 17 0 6 130 561 0 0 0 5:00 PM 0 70 0 0 0 39 18 0 33 0 15 J;gmL 528 0 0 0 5:15 PM 0 6 28 0 0 0 36 16 0 19 0 3 108 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 5 33 0 0 0 52 17 0 23 0 9 139 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 3 33 0 0 0 30 13 0 14 0 4 97 0 0 0 Count Total 0 52 331 0 0 0 335 142 0 154 0 51 1,065 0 0 1 Peak Hour 0 29 196 0 0 0 171 78 0 88 0 32 594 0 0 1 cl N K OCo V V LOON M NCO M LO LO LO MO N M) M NM 00- MO 0000 VCO V-qT V= CO M LD V O) O V M VV O Cl) ON= O V O (O V O N N W I N 00 COQ M0LOM0 01� V O LO LL 0 '(f)NM NCO NLO NN NNNNN M MN M 0M MM Oma U Z 0 O Of LL O O uj 0 Of 0 N d V M M L 0 N O W co O w R � m v ry w w m R (D LOLO a M H Q 000 MIS W CO O0 W MMM V LO LO V M OM M CON V V 00 LO W LO L 0 0 0 M N,3- LO=00 O) 0 o 0� 00)0M 000N= 0 GLOM 0 LO=OHO FNM M VM LO V M S 0)� V =0 p] D) 00 � Ln m0 � Ln Cn M0 -qT V L0,3- NCO 00,3- M 0I 0M = MLO M rM M LO 000)00 N=O) fO I 0( NM LO LO LO O V 000 O MO CO LO N V N0 0 M M 0 MLO f- 0N000 V V�,=0� V LO 000)0 �� W M Z � Q O N 9 � LL � O N � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F C 1- Y- F C � Q00000000000a00000000000.-- O o m o m o.-- �� O o 0 NM V Ln (O I� COO) O NM V Ln (O I� COO) O� 0000000000-0000000000— 0 (D a 0 Q a(D aQ U) a �a (7 iO iOp Np Of ILO V 00 MM—O)=10 CO COM O COLO ='qT LO M00 LO MN00 0 LO (O LO Or V 00(O MNN 0 0LO0 V O V O (O ip 0 �p ALO V N �NNM M MMM V -N� Ln W co V N Ln 0_ O O Q 76 O km2: O H O ui 0 Ofw O z O Of LL O N 0) V M M L 0 O O W co O w R � m v ry w w M O >L LO V Q H p Q M V V V CO LO M O OIC CO 000 M0 V 0 MMS =MM= W V V M 000-qT V MCO LO V V o I 0000) 0(00 V V o I N N N N LO N 0 CO N LO co N LO N N LO COT V MLD 00N OM N CO V N Ln 0)0)N NCO MO) Cl)IS 00 (O Cl) (D 00 LO 01n 000lnM ln o 0L ONN CO O CO LO o 0 N LOO LO LO 0] N 0 m N 111 p Q O N 9 � LL � O N � 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0� 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 F C� YM —O YM —0 C Q00000000000 a0 o00000O� - O C . O C pQ �0 a_ E00NMVLDOrWmo=00NMVLnOrW0== 00000000-0000000 _ a0 � U) aQ a �a (7 APPENDIX B Level of Service Definitions The following information can be found in the Highway Capacity Manual, Transportation Research Board, 2010: Chapter 18 — Signalized Intersections and Chapter 19 — Two -Way Stop Controlled Intersections. Automobile Level of Service (LOS) for Signalized Intersections Levels of service are defined to represent reasonable ranges in control delay. LOS A Describes operations with a control delay of 10s/veh or less and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable or the cycle length is very short. If it is due to favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. LOS B Describes operations with control delay between 10 and 20 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is low and either progression is highly favorable or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A. LOS C Describes operations with control delay between 20 and 35 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when progression is favorable or the cycle length is moderate. Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS D Describes operations with control delay between 35 and 55 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective or the cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. LOS E Describes operations with control delay between 55 and 80 s/veh and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. LOS F Describes operations with control delay exceeding 80 s/veh or a volume -to -capacity ratio greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is very high, progression is very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the queue. Level of Service (LOS) for Unsignalized TWSC Intersections Level of Service Average Control Delay (s/veh) A 0-10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F > 50 APPENDIX C Capacity Worksheets Timings Existing Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT R�SArS9TSAIT Lane Configurations rj rj T, rj tt IN WI tt if Traffic Volume NPb) 12 6 31 41 22 68 99 919 so 84 1746 47 Future Volume(vph) 12 6 31 41 22 68 99 919 so 84 1746 47 Sort How One) 1770 1g32 0 1770 1660 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 1 R ToPeimltled 0701 0ABC 0059 0271 Sort How pen) 1one 1632 0 1360 1660 0 110 3619 1683 606 3619 1 R Sort FlowGYTOy 34 63 76 76 Lane Group FlOw(vph) 13 41 0 46 AV 0 led 999 74 91 1SA7 61 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA pm o NA Perm pmupt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 'EO 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split ff) 240 240 240 240 120 640 640 120 640 640 Total Split CA) 240°% 240°% 240°% 240°% 120% 640°% 640°% 120°% 640°% 640°% Yellow Time ff) 30 30 30 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 At Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Total Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Green is) 8% 8% AA 8% 803 741 741 ]]3 69 69 Actuated g/CPop 009 009 009 009 "0 0 7 074 0]] 070 070 v/cPop Oil 024 038 Das 051 038 006 019 0]] 006 Control Delay 425 202 611 229 206 71 16 3A 144 10 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 425 202 611 229 206 71 16 3A 144 10 LOS D C D C C A A A B A Approach Delay 255 Bey 8A 136 Approach LOB C C A B Queue Length 6(th Q1) MMT�E 2A 14 12 128 0 9 380 0 Queue Length 96th Q1) 26 36 61 59 67 196 16 21 624 A Harder Llnk Dist NO 1 61A no 613 Tum Bay Length G) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 248 }ii 258 see 221 2621 1192 ads 2470 1127 Rebated Cap add 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap add 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 006 012 OP 024 049 038 006 019 0]] 006 Hersechon bum in Cycle LengLh.100 Actuated Cycle LengLh.100 Off ad 0(0°Da, Relemned to phase 2: Be TL and 6: Be TL, Bhtl N Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings ECist ng Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour Maximum we Date :0 ]] Wersecton Signal Delay 12b etllon LOS. B Wersetllon Capacity Ullleallon 760% ISD La1111N Sound Analysis Period pin) 15 Splits and Phases:1 Wad Food &W NO Frontage Food -♦ Yel 2 -401 a, fli;k6 7 February 2020 SynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour Intersection _IW Major1 IF Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 138 Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 127 Stage 1 - - - 127 - Movement - WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations *' T+ - Y - Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 135 106 21 14 7 Future Vol, veh/h 23 135 106 21 14 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None - - 657 None - None Storage Length - Stage 1 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvnnt Flow 25 147 115 23 15 8 Major/Minor Major1 IF Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 138 0 0 324 127 Stage 1 - - - 127 - Stage 2 - - - 197 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1446 - - 670 923 Stage 1 - - - 899 - Stage 2 - - - 836 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1446 - - 657 923 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 657 - Stage 1 - - - 882 - Stage 2 - - - 836 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 10.1 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1446 - - - 727 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - - - 0.031 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 10.1 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 Future Vol, veh/h 15 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 16 107 158 67 66 10 107 158 67 66 10 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 641 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 116 172 73 72 11 Major/Minor Major1 - - 633 831 Conflicting Flow All 245 0 0 357 209 Stage 1 - - - 209 - Stage 2 - - - 148 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1321 - - 641 831 Stage 1 - - - 826 - Stage 2 - - - 880 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1321 - - 633 831 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 633 - Stage 1 - - - 816 - - Stage 2 - - - 880 - 1:1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 11.1 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1321 - - - 633 831 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.012 - - - 0.113 0.013 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 - - - 11.4 9.4 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.4 0 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings EList ng Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour Lane Configurations ) February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC WBi WBR NBL NBT Lane Configurations ) WI T, WI tt IN WI tt if TaXlc Volume NPb) 63 09 13 122 49 1612 so so 1204 "63 Future Volume(vph) 63 22 116 109 13 122 49 1612 so so 1204 "63 Sort FlowmW) 1770 1609 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 1Eye ToPeimltled 0516 0507 0164 0076 Sort How pen) 961 1609 0 306 3619 1683 142 3619 1Eye Sort FlowGYTOy 126 91 64 64 Lane Group FlOw(bph) 74 is 147 0 63 1762 74 63 1one 36 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA prompt NA Perm erupt NA Perm Protected Phases 4 S 6 2 1 6 0 Permitted Phases 4 S 2 2 6 6 Oeletor Phase 4 4 S S 6 2 2 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split Q) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split Q) 300 300 300 300 100 Soo Soo 100 Soo Soo Total Split CA) 250°% 250°% 250°% 250°% SeCO 667% 667% SeCO 667% 667% Yellow Tim Q) 30 30 30 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 At Fed Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust Q) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time Q) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 notal Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Greens) 182 182 to 2 182 8]b at S G S S7 820 820 expands g/CRa110 016 016 016 016 073 Obi Oso 073 Obi Obi v/cRa110 Obi 042 "a 046 Old 073 007 Oso 054 003 Control Delay 675 143 a2 226 69 160 29 Too 119 07 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 675 143 a2 226 69 160 29 Too 119 07 LOS E B F C A B A B B A Approach Delay 286 610 162 116 Approach LOB C 0 B B Queue Length 6(th Q1) 63 16 S9 ad 9 447 2 11 265 0 Queue Length 96th Q1) 99 72 161 96 2a 611 21 28 364 6 Harder Wk Dist NO 182 618 no 613 Tum Bay Length G) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 200 Got 196 407 296 2412 1099 UP 2416 1101 Reheated Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Reduotn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Started Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Ratio OW 0A 060 Oso Old 073 007 Oso 054 ON Cone 120 expands Cy„ce LengLh.120 Oflsal0 (0A, Relemnedto phase 2:NBTLand 6:SBTL Brad N Green Natural Cycle: So Control Type: expands Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings ECist ng Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour Maximum vk Date "a WerSatllon Signal Delay: P2 dtllon LO S.B Wersetllon Capacity Ullleallon N 0% ISD La1111N Pound Analysis Period pin) 15 Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Food &W NO Founded Food Y01 0 -401 102 1 06 So 1 7 February 2020 Syncho Paper SM FO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 Future Vol, veh/h 26 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 28 129 211 25 38 26 129 211 25 38 26 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - - 5.42 - 0 2.218 - 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 575 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 140 229 27 41 28 Major/Minor Major1 - 638 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 256 0 0 439 243 Stage 1 - - - 243 - Stage 2 - - - 196 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1309 - - 575 796 Stage 1 - - - 797 - Stage 2 - - - 837 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1309 - - 562 796 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 562 - Stage 1 - - - 779 - i Stage 2 - - - 837 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 11.3 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1309 - - - 638 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.022 - - - 0.109 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.3 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Existing Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 29 Future Vol, veh/h 29 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 32 196 171 78 88 32 196 171 78 88 32 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None Critical HdwyStg 1 None - None - - - - 5.42 160 0 0 0 3.318 0 1292 - 0 0 Stage 1 0 - 809 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 213 186 85 96 35 Major/Minor Major1 ! Minor2 810 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 271 0 0 506 229 Stage 1 - - - 229 - Stage 2 - - - 277 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1292 - - 526 810 Stage 1 - - - 809 - Stage 2 - - - 770 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1292 - - 513 810 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 513 - Stage 1 - - - 789 - - Stage 2 - - - 770 - q:'1111:�9:3 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 12.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1292 - - - 513 810 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - - 0.186 0.043 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - - 13.6 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.7 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL� L Lane Configurations rj rj T, rj }} IN Traffic Volume NPb) 13 6 Be 43 2a 60 103 966 71 8 Future Volume(vph) 13 6 Be 43 2a 60 103 966 71 AV 1816 49 Sort How One) 1770 1630 0 1770 1662 0 1770 36.+9 1683 171 ToPeimltled 0699 0730 0967 0257 Sort How pen) 1302 1630 0 1360 1662 0 106 3619 1683 47� Sort FlowQSOy 36 66 76 76 Lane Group Flow(bph) 14 42 0 47 90 0 112 toe) ]] 96� Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA true NA Perm true NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 69 69 60 'E9 69 69 60 69 69 69 Minimum Split ff) 249 249 240 249 109 269 25.0 109 250 250 Total Split ff) 249 249 240 249 129 649 640 129 649 649 Total Split CA) 240% 240% 240% 240% 129% 640% 640% 120% 640% 640% Yellow Time ff) 39 39 a0 39 39 49 40 39 49 49 At Per Time is) 29 29 20 29 29 29 20 29 29 29 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total WSTIme ff) 69 69 60 69 69 69 60 69 69 69 Leatl/L>,9 Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Greens) A9 A9 A9 A9 802 7a 739 ]]2 696 696 Actuated g/CPop 099 099 099 099 "0 074 074 0]] 070 070 v/cPop Ott 024 039 Das 053 040 096 021 "a 096 Control Delay 425 199 61 4 229 229 ]3 1 A a6 169 11 Queue Delay 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total Delay 425 199 61 4 229 229 ]3 1 A a6 169 11 TO D B D C C A A A B A Approach Delay 256 Be A4 149 Approach LOB C C A B Queue Largo 6(th Q1) A 4 29 16 1A 136 0 9 416 0 Queue Largo 96th Q1) 27 36 64 61 72 208 16 22 R27 9 Harder unk Dist NO 182 61A no 613 Tum Bay Length QL) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 247 "638 258 363 220 2616 1189 464 2462 1124 Rebated Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 096 Ott Old 024 051 040 096 020 0%0 096 Horsemen bum in Cycle LengLh.100 All Actuated Cycle Largo 100 Off ad 0 (0°D6, Relemnedto phase 2:BeTLand 6:BeTL, Man N Green Nalual Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Pa11P "a Intersection Cignal Delay : to bedlonLO BB Intersection Capacity Unheated 7A o% ICO Laval N Menace Amlyss Period pin) 15 A ago pementle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Road &W 170 Frontage Road 901 4I♦03 -401 los 1 06 R7 February 2020 BynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations a' T+ - V - Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 140 110 22 15 7 Future Vol, veh/h 24 140 110 22 15 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None - - 894 None - None Storage Length - Platoon blocked, % - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 152 120 24 16 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 144 0 0 336 132 Stage 1 - - - 132 - Stage 2 - - - 204 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1438 - - 659 917 Stage 1 - - - 894 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1438 - - 646 917 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 646 - Stage 1 - - - 876 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 10.2 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1438 - - - 713 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.034 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - - 10.2 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 Future Vol, veh/h 16 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 17 111 164 70 69 10 111 164 70 69 10 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 630 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 121 178 76 75 11 Major/Minor Major1 824 0.013 - Conflicting Flow All 254 0 0 371 216 Stage 1 - - - 216 - Stage 2 - - - 155 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1311 - - 630 824 Stage 1 - - - 820 - Stage 2 - - - 873 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1311 - - 622 824 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 622 - Stage 1 - - - 809 - i Stage 2 - - - 873 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1:1111:1 1 0 11.3 B 1311 - - - 622 824 0.013 - - - 0.121 0.013 7.8 - - - 11.6 9.4 A B A 0 0.4 0 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL L Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPb) 22a 121 113 14 127 61 1677 71 65 1252 Mi Future Volume(vph) 71 2a 121 113 14 127 61 1677 71 65 1252 34 Sort How Ont) 1770 1628 0 1770 1611 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 ToPeimltled 0506 0495 0149 0963 Sort How pen) 943 1628 0 922 1611 0 27S 36.+9 1683 117 36.+9 Sort FlowQSOy 122 S7 64 64 Lane Group Flow (bph) 77 167 0 123 163 0 66 1 Sao 77 72 1361 7 Tum Type Perm NA Perm NA pm NA Perm truth NA Perm Protected Phases 4 S 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 S 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 S S 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 69 69 60 69 69 69 60 69 69 69 Minimum Split ff) 249 249 240 249 109 269 25.0 109 259 259 Total Split ff) 309 309 300 309 109 Soo Soo 109 Soo Soo Total Split CA) 250% 250% 250% 250% So% 65.7°% 65.7°% So% 65.7°% 65.7°% Yellow Tim ff) 39 39 30 39 39 49 40 39 49 49 At Fed Time is) 29 29 20 29 29 29 20 29 29 29 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total WS Time ff) 69 69 60 69 69 69 60 69 69 69 Leatl/L>,9 Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT BItl Green (s) 189 189 to 9 189 879 at 2 G 2 872 813 813 expands g/CRaLIo 016 016 016 016 072 053 Oso 073 053 053 v/cRaLlo 052 044 096 047 020 076 097 Das 057 093 Control Delay 675 169 915 243 63 175 31 163 125 0% Queue Delay 09 09 00 09 09 09 00 09 09 09 Total Delay 675 169 915 243 63 175 31 163 125 0% TO E B F C A B A B B A Approach Delay 295 643 165 125 Approach LOB C D B B Queue Largo 6(th Q1) 93 w7r� 9 499 3 12 291 0 Queue Largo 96th Q1) 102 32 M65 106 24 652 22 43 391 6 Harder Link Dist QI) 613 no 613 Tum Bay Length M) 90 116 46 160 120 Base CapacityNPh) r �111�61 404 276 2394 1091 163 post 1093 r U"` Beheaded Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Started Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk RaLld 0 B 036 054 033 020 076 097 Das 057 093 Hersechon armory Cycle Length. 120 expands Cycle Largo 120 Offset 0 (ODS), Relemnedtd phase 2:NBTLand 6:SBTL, Man N Green Nalual Cycle: 30 Control Type: expands Coordinated February 2020 Bynum Perot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Pa11P "5 Intersection Cignal Delay : to bedlonLO BB Intersection Capacity Ullleallon So 0% ICO Laval N SerecaE Amlyss Period pin) 15 A ago pementle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Road &W 170 Fronded Road Y01 0 -401 102 1 06 So 1 7 February 2020 BynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 Future Vol, veh/h 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 134 219 26 40 27 134 219 26 40 27 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 146 238 28 43 29 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 266 0 0 456 252 Stage 1 - - - 252 - Stage 2 - - - 204 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1298 - - 562 787 Stage 1 - - - 790 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1298 - - 549 787 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 549 - Stage 1 - - - 771 - Stage 2 - - - 830 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 11.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1298 - - - 625 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - - - 0.117 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.5 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 30 Future Vol, veh/h 30 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 33 204 178 81 92 33 204 178 81 92 33 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 513 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 222 193 88 100 36 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 802 Conflicting Flow All 281 0 0 525 237 Stage 1 - - - 237 - Stage 2 - - - 288 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1282 - - 513 802 Stage 1 - - - 802 - Stage 2 - - - 761 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1282 - - 500 802 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 500 - Stage 1 - - - 781 - i Stage 2 - - - 761 - 1:1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 12.9 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1282 - - - 500 802 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.025 - - - 0.2 0.045 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 - - - 14 9.7 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.7 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2040 BL WBi WBR NdL� Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPb) to 9 47 62 "63 AV 149 1 a7 102 126 261A Future Volume oph) 1A 9 47 62 "63 AV 149 1 a7 102 126 261A 71 Sort How Ont) 1770 1630 0 1770 1660 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 To Peimltled 0540 0717 0061 0121 Sort How pen) 1006 1630 0 1"636 1660 0 114 3619 1683 225 3619 Sort FlowQSOy 61 96 76 76 Lane Group Flow oph) 20 61 0 67 131 0 162 1499 111 1W 246 M Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA true NA Perm true NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Donator Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Belli ff) 240 240 240 240 100 620 620 140 650 650 Total Split CA) 240% 240% 240% 240% 100% 620% 620% 140% 650% 650% Yellow Time ff) 30 30 a0 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 At Fed Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Leadl Dead Led Lad Dead Led Led Dead Led Optimize? Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Green (s) 103 103 103 103 770 661 65.1 723 627 627 Actuated g/CRaLIo 010 010 010 010 077 055 065 072 053 053 v/cRaLlo 019 029 049 051 050 055 011 046 128 098 Control Delay 436 179 633 213 21 133 a 7 90 1626 23 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 436 179 633 213 21 133 a 7 90 1626 23 TO D B D C C B A A F A Approach Delay 242 Be 142 1424 Approach LOB C C B F Queue Largo 6(th Q1) 12 6 41 OTT 44 267 7 16 -1228 0 Queue Largo 96th Q1) 34 42 at 76 M50 446 33 ad M386 1A Harder unk Dist QI) 182 61A no 613 Tum Bay Length M) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 191 361 253 392 270 2304 1067 at 2218 1020 Beheaded Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Redutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Feel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced we Rano 010 017 026 Das 095 095 0� Hersechon armory Cycle Length. 100 Actuated Cycle Largo 100 Offset SO @694), Referenatl to phase 2NBTLand 6:SBTL, Man N amen Nalual Cycle: 160 Control Type: Actuated Coordinated i February 2020 Bynum Perot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Maximum vk CUP 12A Intersection Cignal Delay: 91% �'edlon LO C.F Intersection Capacity Unheated 1041°% ICD Laval N Menace Amlyss Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue lstheornally lmmne. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes. A agopemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Road &W 170 Frontage Road �Ot 1" 105 1W6 So7 February 2020 CynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations a �. HCM Lane LOS ►� - B Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 203 159 32 21 11 Future Vol, veh/h 35 203 159 32 21 11 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None None - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 38 221 173 35 23 12 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 208 0 0 488 191 Stage 1 - - - 191 - Stage 2 - - - 297 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1363 - - 539 851 Stage 1 - - - 841 - Stage 2 - - - 754 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1363 - - 522 851 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 522 - Stage 1 - - - 814 - i Stage 2 - - - 754 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 11.3 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1363 - - - 602 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - - - 0.058 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.7 0 - - 11.3 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.2 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 Future Vol, veh/h 23 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 25 161 237 101 99 15 161 237 101 99 15 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 504 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 175 258 110 108 16 Major/Minor Major1 IF Major2 Minor2 0.022 Conflicting Flow All 368 0 0 538 313 Stage 1 - - - 313 - Stage 2 - - - 225 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1191 - - 504 727 Stage 1 - - - 741 - Stage 2 - - - 812 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1191 - - 493 727 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 493 - Stage 1 - - - 725 - - Stage 2 - - - 812 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) EB WB S� 1 0 13.7 B 493 727 0.218 0.022 14.3 10.1 B B 0.8 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2040 BL WBi WBR Be Tran Configurations s rr r s wr r Trani Volume Npb) 174 164 4 2 20 74 Fors 102 95 1806 FNure 102 "63 P4 164 20 TToooo ifi3 74 102 96 1506 50 How One) Bartle Row WW) 1� 0 P10 1611 0 aFordse) 3639 1683 3639 ye 1663 fted 0402 0394 05a OA99 05a OA99 SortTo How Bartle Flow 749 0 P34 1611 0 99 3639 1663 99 3639 1663 Bartle Flow GYTO y 82 64 Flown Group Flow (bpb) NA 0 17Sen 21 PN 0 80 2628 111 103 1963 54 64 TLaneom Toch Type Pillerm Perm NA Perm NA pom A Perm eruptNA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 11 6 PermittedPhases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Phase 4 4 8 8 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Pr Bw11M Phase Minimum mal (s) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 S Minimum Balli ff) 24A 240 290 240 100 260 0 100 Total Belli 290 290 290 290 100 810 810 G 100 G0 810 G0 810 TotalCA Bp111 Pa 24a0 24x0 24a0 24a0 83°h 61b°0 614°0 8a0 614°0 61b°0 lo Yellow Tim ff) 20 20 30 20 20 90 20 NFFred el 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Adjust Wi ➢meTime 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) ) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Dead Lag las Dead Lag Lag DeadOpllmha'I dLed Yes Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Recall RamrMmla None None None None None &Max G7Max50 None GMaz CA4az LXtl Green is) 240 240 290 240 510 520 eACTx Atlualto Rano 020 020 020 020 045 062 002 060 042 045 044 064 0770 64 044 WSRolo 074 048 122 Edol 1 19 011 006 006 Control Belay 761 as 7 1864 s0 361 at7 300 1134 94 509 609 Z00 10 Delay 09 09 o0 09 09 00 00 09 02 00 Total Total Belay 761 33.] 1864 361 at 1134 94 609 2a 10 Los F C r 2 c F A B C A Approach Delay 474 Too 1070 240 LOS Approach LOS o F F c Queue largo 65th Q1) s2 Too -169 � 16 � 21 667 o Queue Fargo 95th Q1) M]8 156 HIID 191 191 W2 Al 421 Mno 36 M21 12 Distgh Ql) ITom 182 618 J 880 0 613 61a B y Le Tum Bay Langlh Ql) 90 116 46 160 120 Base _ 149 391 ID6 W9� 136 ley 2211 10f0 1W 2270 1035 tedCapacity Fee Reheated Capr&tlupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BpIIIbse Cap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 StoraReduce Cap eel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Fato Reduced vk Rano 074 048 122 048 059 119 011 076 0%6 006 Horsemen armory Cycle Length. 120 expands Cycle Fargo 120 Offset 0 (0°h), Relemnedto phase 2:NBTLand 6:BBTL Bah N Green Nalual Cycle: 140 Control Type: expands Coordinated February 2020 Bynum Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Background Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 20a0 Maximum vk CUP :122 Intersection Cignal Delay 722 �'edlon LOC. E Intersection Capacity Ullleallon 1112°% ICO Laval N CerecaH Amlyss Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically lmmna. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes. A agopemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases : 1 Wad HoaO &W 170 Fronded HoaO Y01 1021 102 1 06 So7 February 2020 CynMm Paper SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 Future Vol, veh/h 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 194 317 38 57 39 194 317 38 57 39 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 211 345 41 62 42 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 386 0 0 661 366 Stage 1 - - - 366 - Stage 2 - - - 295 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1172 - - 427 679 Stage 1 - - - 702 - Stage 2 - - - 755 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1172 - - 409 679 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 409 - Stage 1 - - - 673 - i Stage 2 - - - 755 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 14.4 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1172 - - - 488 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.036 - - - 0.214 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.2 0 - - 14.4 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.8 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Background Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Major1 700 0.041 - Conflicting Flow All 406 0 0 759 Int Delay, s/veh 4.2 - - - 343 - Stage 2 - - Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j + T+ - - ►j r Traffic Vol, veh/h 44 294 257 117 132 48 Future Vol, veh/h 44 294 257 117 132 48 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - - None - None Storage Length 75 - - 160 0 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlow 48 320 279 127 143 52 Major/Minor Major1 700 0.041 - Conflicting Flow All 406 0 0 759 343 Stage 1 - - - 343 - Stage 2 - - - 416 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1153 - - 374 700 Stage 1 - - - 719 - Stage 2 - - - 666 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1153 - - 358 700 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 358 - Stage 1 - - - 689 - - Stage 2 - - - 666 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) February 2020 :1_1111:1 Ti 0 18.7 C 1153 - - - 358 700 0.041 - - - 0.401 0.075 8.3 - - - 21.6 10.6 A C B 0.1 1.9 0.2 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL Net Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPb) 13 6 Be 64 2a 82 103 966 93 109 1816 Future Volume(Loop13 6 Be 64 2a 82 103 966 93 109 1816 49 Bart Flow W) W 1770 1630 0 1770 1646 0 1770 36.+) 1683 1770 36.+9 ToPeimltled 0616 0730 0060 0242 Bart How pen) 1146 1630 0 1360 1646 0 112 3619 1683 461 3619 Bart FlowQaOg 36 E9 76 76 Lane Group Flow (Loop 14 42 0 70 114 0 112 1Oak 101 118 1973 7 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA pmv NA Perm pm�A NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permltled Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split ff) 240 240 240 240 120 640 640 120 640 640 Total Split CA) 240°% 240°% 240°% 240°% 120% 640°% 640°% 120°% 640°% 640°% Yellow Time ff) 30 30 a0 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 Al Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Toddled Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Othruze'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Green (s) 105 105 10 6 105 761 665 65.6 739 659 659 Adhered g/Cand Oto Oto Oto Oto 076 055 066 074 055 055 v/cans Ott 021 049 096 053 044 009 028 0%6 006 Control Delay 406 182 E.0 190 224 93 29 46 191 12 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 406 182 E.0 190 224 93 29 46 191 12 TO D B D B C A A A B A Approach Delay 2a 319 99 179 Approach LOB C C A B Queue Length 60th Q1) A 4 43 16 16 147 6 13 446 0 Queue Length 96th Q1) 26 34 84 63 72 Zt0 26 30 we 9 Internal unk Dist NO 182 286 no 613 Tum Bay Length QL) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 217 "638 258 384 21A 2361 1077 4"63 Fee) 1064 BhrvaLlon Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Feedutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Model Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 006 Ott 027 030 051 044 009 0 2 0%6 006 Horsemen bum in Cycle LengLh.100 Adhered Cycle LengLh.100 Off ad 0(0°D6, Relemned to phase 2: Be TL and 6: Be TL Bah N Green Nalual Cycle: 90 Control Type: Adhered Coordinated i February 2020 BynMm Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Date "5 Intersection Cignal Delay : 159 edlonLOS .B Intersection Capacity Ullleallon794% ICO Laval N Menace Amlys6 Period pin) 15 A 96Npemenble volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Food &W 170 donate Food 901 4I♦03 -401 los 1 06 R7 February 2020 BynMm Fepoh SM FO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations a �. HCM Lane LOS ►� - B Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 161 132 22 15 7 Future Vol, veh/h 24 161 132 22 15 7 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized _ - None None - None Storage Length - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 26 175 143 24 16 8 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 167 0 0 382 155 Stage 1 - - - 155 - Stage 2 - - - 227 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1411 - - 620 891 Stage 1 - - - 873 - Stage 2 - - - 811 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1411 - - 608 891 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 608 - Stage 1 - - - 856 - Stage 2 - - - 811 - 1:1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1 0 10.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1411 - - - 676 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.018 - - - 0.035 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.6 0 - - 10.5 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 Future Vol, veh/h 25 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 27 120 174 70 69 20 120 174 70 69 20 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 597 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 130 189 76 75 22 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 812 Conflicting Flow All 265 0 0 411 227 Stage 1 - - - 227 - Stage 2 - - - 184 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1299 - - 597 812 Stage 1 - - - 811 - Stage 2 - - - 848 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1299 - - 584 812 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 584 - Stage 1 - - - 794 - - Stage 2 - - - 848 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.4 0 11.5 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1299 - - - 584 812 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.021 - - - 0.128 0.027 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 - - - 12.1 9.6 HCM Lane LOS A - - - B A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.5 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 173 Future Vo,veh/h 173 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 35 13 126 34 12 35 13 126 34 12 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1342 - 0.075 - - 0.011 - 0 0 226 0 207 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 165 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 188 38 14 137 37 13 Major/Minor Major1 - 1342 - 0.075 - - 0.011 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 226 0 372 207 Stage 1 - - - - 207 - Stage 2 - - - - 165 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1342 - 629 833 Stage 1 - - - - 828 - Stage 2 - - - - 864 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1342 - 622 833 - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 622 - Stage 1 - - - - 828 - i Stage 2 - - - - 854 - i HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 0.7 10.8 B 666 - - 1342 - 0.075 - - 0.011 - 10.8 - - 7.7 0 B A A 0.2 0 - February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBTIW WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations TI) Traffic Vol, veh/h 167 Future Vo,veh/h 167 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 7 187 9 6 9 7 187 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # Major1 - 1381 - Minor1 0 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 192 0 406 0 0 - 0 - 187 - 0 0 - - 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 182 10 8 203 10 7 Major/Minor Major1 - 1381 - Minor1 0.024 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 192 0 406 187 Stage 1 - - - - 187 - Stage 2 - - - - 219 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1381 - 601 855 Stage 1 - - - - 845 - Stage 2 - - - - 817 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1381 - 597 855 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 597 - Stage 1 - - - - 845 - i Stage 2 - - - - 811 - Approach UB WB N HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 10.4 - HCM LOS B 8mi a FMW 18FMe 8Pin, 1011.11ii :1.1Mq:I.WITl:1Wllll:11 Capacity (veh/h) 679 - - 1381 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.024 - - 0.006 - HCM Control Delay (s) 10.4 - 7.6 0 - HCM Lane LOS B - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 _ - 0 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2022 WBi WBR NBL Net 4RR- L Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F Traffic Volume NPb) 2a 121 161 14 164 61 1677 112 iW rude Volume (vph) 71 2a 121 161 14 164 61 1677 112 107 1252 34 Bart Flowwon 1770 1628 0 1770 1606 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1610 To Peimltled 0444 0530 0147 0062 Bart How pen) 827 1628 0 987 1606 0 274 36.+9 1683 97ENNEEN Bart FlowQSOg 122 87 64 64 Lane Group Flow (bph) 77 161 0 164 193 0 66 1 Sao 122 116 Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA pmupl NA Perm pm�pl NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 6 2 1 6 Permltled Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 OeletlOr Phase 4 4 8 8 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split ff) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Split ff) 300 300 300 300 100 800 800 100 800 800 Total Split CA) 250°% 250°% 250°% 250°% So% 60.7°% 60.7°% So% 60.7°% 60.7°% Yellow Tim ff) 30 30 30 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 Al Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust ff) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Toddled Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Opllmha'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Ertl Green (s) 223 223 223 223 G % 764 764 842 785 785 expands g/CRod 019 019 019 019 Obi 053 053 070 055 055 v/cRod 050 0 B 090 052 022 0%2 012 076 059 004 Cower Delay 649 146 917 2A 73 215 60 603 140 0% Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 649 146 91 7 29 73 215 60 603 140 0% TO 0 B F C A C A 0 B A Approach Delay 27% 675 201 164 Approach LOB C E C B Queue length 60th Mn 63 22 122 70 11 660 17 40 o2a 0 Queue length 96th Mn 104 82 1039 196 24 662 41 M62 391 6 Harder The Dist QI) 182 286 no 613 Tum Bay Faro Mn 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 172 436 206 403 253 2124 1018 166 W5 1067 Bhrvallon Cap anupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Feedutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Manage Cap anupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano 096 036 0%0 098 022 0%2 012 076 059 004 CycleFargo 120 expands Cycle Leng1h.120 Offsa1.0(0°Da, Relemnecto phase 2: NBTL and 6: Bert Man N Green ENNE Nalual Cycle: 80 Comml Type: expands Coordinated February 2020 BynMm Perot SM RO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Maximum vk Date 090 Intersection Cignal Delay 224 edlonLOS .0 Intersection Capacity UllleallonSOS% ICO Laval N CerecaE Analysis Period pin) 15 A 96Npemenble volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Food &W 170 Fronded Food Y01 0 -401 102 1 06 So 1 7 February 2020 CynMm Fepoh SM SO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 27 Future Vol, veh/h 27 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 173 259 26 40 27 173 259 26 40 27 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 29 188 282 28 43 29 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 310 0 0 542 296 Stage 1 - - - 296 - Stage 2 - - - 246 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1250 - - 501 743 Stage 1 - - - 755 - Stage 2 - - - 795 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1250 - - 488 743 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 488 - Stage 1 - - - 735 - Stage 2 - - - 795 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 12.3 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1250 - - - 566 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.023 - - - 0.129 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - - 12.3 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.4 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 47 Future Vol, veh/h 47 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 51 220 196 81 92 51 220 196 81 92 51 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - - None - None - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - 465 0 0 - - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 239 213 88 100 55 Major/Minor Major1� Minor2 0.041 - Conflicting Flow All 301 0 0 598 257 Stage 1 - - - 257 - Stage 2 - - - 341 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1260 - - 465 782 Stage 1 - - - 786 - Stage 2 - - - 720 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1260 - - 446 782 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 446 - Stage 1 - - - 755 - - Stage 2 - - - 720 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) :1_1111:1 1.4 0 13.5 B 1260 - - - 446 782 0.041 - - - 0.224 0.071 8 - - - 15.4 10 A C B 0.1 0.8 0.2 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 177 Future Vo,veh/h 177 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 65 24 262 59 22 65 24 262 59 22 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1301 - Minor1 - 0 0 263 0 228 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 337 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 192 71 26 285 64 24 Major/Minor Major1 - 1301 - Minor1 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 263 0 565 228 Stage 1 - - - - 228 - Stage 2 - - - - 337 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1301 - 486 811 Stage 1 - - - - 810 - Stage 2 - - - - 723 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1301 - 474 811 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 474 - Stage 1 - - - - 810 - Stage 2 - - - - 706 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.7 13.1 B 534 - - 1301 - 0.165 - - 0.02 - 13.1 - - 7.8 0 B A A 0.6 0.1 - February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2022 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 196 Future Vo,veh/h 196 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 17 12 235 16 11 17 12 235 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # WB Nth Minor1 0.4 11.2 0 0 231 0 222 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 281 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 213 18 13 255 17 12 Major/Minor Major1 WB Nth Minor1 0.4 11.2 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 231 0 503 222 Stage 1 - - - - 222 - Stage 2 - - - - 281 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1337 - 528 818 Stage 1 - - - - 815 - Stage 2 - - - - 767 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1337 - 522 818 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 522 - Stage 1 - - - - 815 - i Stage 2 - - - - 759 - i HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB Nth 0 0.4 11.2 B NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT 612 - - 1337 - 0.048 - - 0.01 - 11.2 - - 7.7 0 B A A 0.2 0 - February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings BL WBi WBR Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Lane Configurations AM Peak Hour -Year 2040 A --* e Id- ek— 4d- ellt r \sw 1 ✓ February 2020 BynMm Perot SM SO CHA LLC BL WBi WBR NBL Net Lane Configurations F A F A F }} IN F }} Traffic Volume NPb) To 9 47 As "63 109 149 1 a7 124 14A 261A Future Vollume(vph) 1A 9 47 As "63 109 149 1 a7 124 14A 261A 71 Bart Flowm&) 1770 1630 0 1770 1649 0 1770 36.+9 1683 1770 36.+9 To Samoan 0482 0717 0A63 0113 Bart How pen) SeA 1630 0 1"636 1649 0 117 3619 1683 210 3619 Bart FlowQaOg 61 116 76 76 Lane Group Flow (bph) 20 61 0 90 164 0 162 1499 136 161 246 M Tom Type Perm NA Perm NA pmv NA Perm pmV NA Perm Protected Phases 4 A 6 2 1 6 Permltled Phases 4 A 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 A A 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum lmal is) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Minimum Split Q) 240 240 240 240 100 260 25.0 100 250 250 Total Belli Q) 240 240 240 240 100 620 620 140 650 650 Total Split CA) 240% 240% 240% 240% 100% 620% 620% 140% 650% 650% Yellow Time Q) 30 30 a 0 30 30 40 40 30 40 40 Al Per Time is) 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Fast Fine Adjust Q) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total WS Time Q) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Toddled Dead Led Led Dead Led Led Dead Led Onnize'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yes Yet Recall Mode None None None None None &Max CMax None CMax CMax ACT Prot Greens) 120 120 120 120 742 so 1 63.1 717 61 A 61 A Adhered g/CRod Ott Ott Ott Ott 074 053 053 072 052 052 v/cRod 019 025 056 052 064 067 Ota 056 130 ON Control Delay 415 163 641 185 Be 14% 47 142 1613 23 Queue Delay 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Total Delay 415 163 641 185 Be 14% 47 142 1613 23 TO D B D B C B A B F A Approach Delay 226 316 JIML 167 1496 Approach LOB C C B F Queue Length 60th Q1) MMTTMMMT 66 m7f� 46 27 13 20 -1252 0 Queue Length 96th Q1) "63 41 101 77 M 7 461 43 70 M386 1A Harder Link Dist NO 182 26 no 613 Tum Bay Length G) 90 116 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity NPh) 170 361 mmill 407 7 256 221 1026 one 2186 1007 BhrvaLlon Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bedrock Cap Feedutln 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 A Model Cap adudn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vk Rano Ott OP 036 038 064 067 Ota 053 130 IrILUNUUMH an Cycle Length. 100 Adhered Cycle LengLh.100 Offse1.0 (0°D6, Relemnedto phase 2:BeTLand 6:BeTL Man N Green Nalual Cycle: 160 Control Type: Adhered Coordinated i February 2020 BynMm Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour -Year 20a0 Maximum vk Date 1 so Intersection Cignal Delay: 959 �'edlon LO C.F Intersection Capacity Ullleallon 1N9% ICD Laval N Menace Amlys6 Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue lstheoranally lmmne. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes. A 96Npemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases: 1 Wad Food &W 170 donate Food �Ot 1" 105 1W6 So7 February 2020 CynMm Fepoh SM FO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 35 Future Vol, veh/h 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 38 224 181 32 21 11 224 181 32 21 11 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 0 2.218 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 507 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 243 197 35 23 12 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 HCM Lane V/C Ratio Conflicting Flow All 232 0 0 534 215 Stage 1 - - - 215 - Stage 2 - - - 319 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1336 - - 507 825 Stage 1 - - - 821 - Stage 2 - - - 737 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1336 - - 490 825 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 490 - Stage 1 - - - 794 - i Stage 2 - - - 737 - i HCM Control Delay, s 1.1 0 11.7 HCM LOS B Capacity (veh/h) 1336 - - - 569 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.028 - - - 0.061 HCM Control Delay (s) 7.8 0 - - 11.7 HCM Lane LOS A A - - B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.2 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 3 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 32 Future Vol, veh/h 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 35 170 247 101 99 25 170 247 101 99 25 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 478 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 185 268 110 108 27 Major/Minor M or2 Minor2 0.038 Conflicting Flow All 378 0 0 578 323 Stage 1 - - - 323 - Stage 2 - - - 255 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1180 - - 478 718 Stage 1 - - - 734 - Stage 2 - - - 788 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1180 - - 464 718 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 464 - Stage 1 - - - 712 - - Stage 2 - - - 788 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1180 - 0.029 - 8.1 - A 14.1 B 464 718 0.232 0.038 15.1 10.2 C B 0.9 0.1 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 246 Future Vo,veh/h 246 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 35 13 179 34 12 35 13 179 34 12 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1256 - 0.089 - - 0.011 - 0 0 305 0 286 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 223 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 267 38 14 195 37 13 Major/Minor Major1 - 1256 - 0.089 - - 0.011 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 305 0 509 286 Stage 1 - - - - 286 - Stage 2 - - - - 223 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1256 - 524 753 Stage 1 - - - - 763 - Stage 2 - - - - 814 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1256 - 518 753 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 518 - Stage 1 - - - - 763 - Stage 2 - - - - 804 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.5 12 B 564 - - 1256 - 0.089 - - 0.011 - 12 - - 7.9 0 B A A 0.3 0 - February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road AM Peak Hour - Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBTIW WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations TI) Traffic Vol, veh/h 236 Future Vo,veh/h 236 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 9 7 265 9 6 9 7 265 9 6 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1297 - Minor1 - 0.006 - 0 0 267 0 262 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 304 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 257 10 8 288 10 7 Major/Minor Major1 - 1297 - Minor1 - 0.006 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 267 0 566 262 Stage 1 - - - - 262 - Stage 2 - - - - 304 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1297 - 486 777 Stage 1 - - - - 782 - Stage 2 - - - - 748 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1297 - 483 777 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 483 - Stage 1 - - - - 782 - Stage 2 - - - - 743 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.2 11.5 B 569 - - 1297 - 0.029 - - 0.006 - 11.5 - - 7.8 0 B A A 0.1 0 - February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road Be Peak Hour -Year 2040 BL WBi WBR NBL Net Lane COn1(quallOns WI ww r WI ww iaXlc Volume NPb) 174 202 2 20 220 Fors 143 136 0 FNure Volume 102 "63 P4 202 20 220 74 2418 143 136 TTwowo 50 How Bartle Row WW) 0 16V8 0 70 3639 1683 o5o9 3639 ye 16s3 fted OF 0590 0394 o94 05a OA99 05a OA99 SortTo How Bartle Flow 690 0 734 1671 0 99 3639 1663 99 3639 1663 Bartle Flow FTO 82 64 Flow( Lane Group Flow (bpb) NA 0 261 61 0 80 2628 140 1963 54 64 Toch Type Pillerm Perm NA Perm en NA NA en Perm pm� NA Perm ProtectedPhases 4 8 2 1 1 6 d Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 DstectPhase 4 4 8 8 6 2 2 1 6 6 Switch Pr Bw11M Phase Minimum (s) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Split Minimum Balli ff) 240 240 290 240 100 260 0 100 50 Total Belli 290 290 290 290 810 G 81 0 100 G0 810 G0 810 CA TOhI Bp111 Pa 242°0 24x0 24a0 242°0 eCO 83°h 61b°0 614°0 83°0 614°0 61b°0 Yellow Tim ff) 30 30 30 30 30 90 30 NFPer el 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 Wi➢ Adjust OL OL 00 OL OL OL OL OL OL Q1Time ) Toddles Time ff) 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 Dead LedYes e9 Lag Lag dLed Dead ecallM Opllmha'I Yet Yes Yes Yes Yesead Yes Yes Yes Recall Mode None None None GMax750 G750Max G770Max CMax LXtl Greenis)240 240 240 290 240 240 510 520 S20 770 eACTx Ra110 020 020 020 020 045 060 002 060 042 soN Odo 064 064 044 VicadOtlg/C 004 Eds7 141 027 059 119 016 10 107 006 006 Control Belay Cower 1160 a0 300 2940 400 300 1134 00 1200 Z00 10 QueueDelay09 09 00 00 09 00 00 09 00 00 Total Belay �60 33.] 2940 427 31] 1134 6A 1207 2a 10 Los r C r B c F A r C A Approach 612 1650 m64 29c Approach TO E F F C Queue engdh 60th _ 56 100 �6 135 16 -1291 26 0 G) N Q1) Queue ehe 1003 156 #96 2t6 W2 Mno 64 n4 1014 760 12 Harder Dist Qd) 182 286 � 880 61a 613 B yFa go Tum Bay Fargo Qd) 90 1 116 46 160 120 Base Capacity 110 391 W0 136 ley 2211 1013 1W 2270 1035 an Bedroc0n Capr&tlupn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Manage Cap nadir 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduce son Reduced vk Ra110 094 048 1 5 069 059 119 016 1A8 0%6 006 Horsemen bum in Cycle Fargo 120 expands Cycle enigh 120 Off ad 0 (0°0), Relemnedto phase 2:BeTLand 6:BeTL Bah N Green Nadual Cycle: 150 Conder Type: expands Coordinated February 2020 Bynche Perot SM SO CHA LLC Timings Total Traffic Volumes 1'. Ward Road & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 20a0 Maximum vk Date :151 Intersection Cignal Delay 792 �'edlon LOC. E Intersection Capacity Ullleallon 1155% ICO Laval N CerecaH Analysis Period pin) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue lstheoie111ally lmmna. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes. A 96Npemenllle volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown 6 maximum anertwo codes Splits and Phases : 1 Wad Food &W 170 Fronded Food Y01 1021 102 1 06 So7 February 2020 CynMm Fepoh SM FO CHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 2: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Van Gordon Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 39 Future Vol, veh/h 39 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized _ - 233 357 38 57 39 233 357 38 57 39 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 42 253 388 41 62 42 Major/Minor Major1W Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 429 0 0 746 409 Stage 1 - - - 409 - Stage 2 - - - 337 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1130 - - 381 642 Stage 1 - - - 671 - Stage 2 - - - 723 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1130 - - 365 642 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 365 - Stage 1 - - - 642 - Stage 2 - - - 723 - :1_1111:1 HCM Control Delay, s 1.2 0 15.6 HCM LOS C Capacity (veh/h) 1130 - - - 443 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - - - 0.236 HCM Control Delay (s) 8.3 0 - - 15.6 HCM Lane LOS A A - - C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - - - 0.9 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 3: W 1-70 Frontage Road & Tabor Street PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations ►j Traffic Vol, veh/h 61 Future Vol, veh/h 61 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized - Storage Length 75 Veh in Median Storage, # - Grade, % - Peak Hour Factor 92 Heavy Vehicles,% 2 Mvmt Flow 66 310 275 117 132 66 310 275 117 132 66 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None - - - 5.42 - 160 0 0 0 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 0 - - 339 0 0 - 0 - 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 337 299 127 143 72 Major/Minor - - 319 Minor2 0.059 - Conflicting Flow All 426 0 0 832 363 Stage 1 - - - 363 - Stage 2 - - - 469 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1133 - - 339 682 Stage 1 - - - 704 - Stage 2 - - - 630 - Platoon blocked, % - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1133 - - 319 682 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 319 - Stage 1 - - - 663 - - Stage 2 - - - 630 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) :1_1111:1 1.4 0 20.4 C 1133 - - - 319 682 0.059 - - - 0.45 0.105 8.4 - - - 25.2 10.9 A D B 0.2 2.2 0.4 February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 4: Access A & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 247 Future Vo,veh/h 247 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 65 24 372 59 22 65 24 372 59 22 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # - 1220 - Minor1 - 0.021 - 0 0 339 0 304 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 456 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 268 71 26 404 64 24 Major/Minor Major1 - 1220 - Minor1 - 0.021 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 339 0 760 304 Stage 1 - - - - 304 - Stage 2 - - - - 456 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 374 736 Stage 1 - - - - 748 - Stage 2 - - - - 638 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1220 - 364 736 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 364 - Stage 1 - - - - 748 - Stage 2 - - - - 621 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.5 15.8 C 422 - - 1220 - 0.209 - - 0.021 - 15.8 - - 8 0 C A A 0.8 0.1 - February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC HCM 6th TWSC Total Traffic Volumes 5: Access B & W 1-70 Frontage Road PM Peak Hour -Year 2040 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations '* Traffic Vol, veh/h 273 Future Vo,veh/h 273 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 Sign Control Free RT Channelized Storage Length Veh in Median Storage, Grade, % Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % Mvmt Flow 17 12 329 16 11 17 12 329 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 Free Free Free Stop Stop None - None - None # ' Minor1 - 0.01 - 0 0 315 0 306 Stage 1 - 0 0 - 0 - - - 384 0 0 - 4.12 92 92 92 92 92 92 2 2 2 2 2 2 297 18 13 358 17 12 Major/Minor Major1 ' Minor1 - 0.01 - Conflicting Flow All 0 0 315 0 690 306 Stage 1 - - - - 306 - Stage 2 - - - - 384 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical HdwyStg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1245 - 411 734 Stage 1 - - - - 747 - Stage 2 - - - - 688 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1245 - 406 734 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - - 406 - Stage 1 - - - - 747 - - Stage 2 - - - - 679 - HCM Control Delay, s HCM LOS Capacity (veh/h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Control Delay (s) HCM Lane LOS HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) B WB NB 0 0.3 12.7 B 496 - - 1245 - 0.059 - - 0.01 - 12.7 - - 7.9 0 B A A 0.2 0 - February 2020 Synchro Report SM ROCHA LLC CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE U115 LANE HOLDMGS, LLC. MIXED -CBE DEVELORIEM 15 TO REHABILITATE THIS FORMER GRAVEL MINE SITE INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SIIFRO.NJDING A PRIVATE LAKE AND LMEAR FARC WHICH WILL BE A VITAL AND UNIQUE AMEN1x FOR THE RESIDENTS ADD FATRCT15 OF THIS OEVEACHe MEDT AND THE GREATER COMMUNITY THE HIGHLY VISIBLE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES OCCURIW ON THE LANE WILL SERVE TO ENHANCE THE "PRIMARY GATEWAY" ASPECT OF THIS DEVELOPMENT. THE PROJECT FROEOSES TRANSIT SUPPORTI As USES AND DENSITIES AS PART OF THE NORTHWEST S'UBaffa PLAN. A RESIDENTIAL COMMONx Is PROPOSED FOR THE OFFER PLANNMG AREA (FAV WITH RETAIL AMPERES. THE ARCAIrtEcnRE WILL FRQNT AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN COR21DOR5 AND WILL AL50 TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE 51TE TOPOGRAPHY TO FROVIDE VIEWS TO THE LAKEFRONT. THE ACRER FENINSULA SITE IN PLANNING AREA (PA2) I5 FRq'05E) TO CONTAIN RETAIL, THE DESIGN INTENT FOR THIS AREA IB TO TAKE ADVANTAGE CF THE WATER -FRONT LOCATION ANO SITE VISIBILITY FROM 1-10 TO SHOWCASE WATER SPORTS THIS ACTIVITY NODE WOULD ALSO SERVE TO CREATE A GATEWAY INTO THE CITY. THE KEY PROXIMITY AND VISIBILLY OF THIS DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARD ROAD, AND WARD STREET STATION CORRIDORS WILL DEER A UNDER LEAEL OF VITALLY AND COMMUNlY SYNEREir THAT WILL BE FURTHER E1TUANC7) BY THE OAERALL COMPLEMENTARY aRGulrEcruRAL, LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY PH RELOEMENr OF BOTH PLANNING AREAS. CASE HISTORY WZ-19-03 STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS CONCEPIU4L IN NATURE, 57ECIFlC PH RELOPMENT ELEMEN75 SUCH AS 517E LAYOUT AND BUILDING ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRE08ED ON THIS DOCUMENT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAT MU57 BE SUBMITTED AND APR20VED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDCB FRIOR TO THE BUIEF17"AL OF A RIGHT -CF -WAY OR BUILDINL FEW17 APPLICATION AND ANY SUBSEQUENT SITE DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ALL PARKIW.a SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-1109 OF THE WHEAT RIOBB CORE OF LAWS. ALL LAIRP&DEME , SAALL HE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 36-503 GP THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL FENDING SHALL BE IN COFORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL BICNAE SHALL SE IN CONFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RODE CODE OR LAWS. BILLBOARDS ARE EROHI IT ED. ARCHTECLARAL, SITE, ANP STREETBEENEE DESIGN SHALL BE IN COiFORMANCE WITH THE ARGHNECNRAL AND SITE DESMON MANUAL (ASPM) AND STREFTECAPE PE51GN MARTIAL. OJE OOR STORAGE: BOATS AND INVENTORY ARE TO BE DISPLAYED IN OUTDOOR AREAS COMPLYING WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION NB &Z3.. STANDARDS FOR OF -STREET VEHICULAR DARKENS, BICYCLE PARKINS, AND LOADIFA'a, PARCING FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS Bell BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR BIDE OF BJILDI415, AND STRUCTURED PARKING 15 ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL FREE-StANpIbCi COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAT PROVIDE SURFACE FARK1fNG AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE 5PECIFIC PROPOSED USE. BICYCLE PARKIW.F ANP VEHICILAR LOADING FOR PASSENGERS AND, As APER GERIATE, MERCHANDISE, 54ALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRUCTURES SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPINS AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS 5HALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY 5MRUP"I'l 5. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL BE ALLOLED. PROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY 57RUCTURE5 5HALL NOT EXCEED TWENTY PERCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE FRIMART STRUCTURE OR STRIMCICRE5 ON THE SUBJECT LOT. ACCE050RY PAILDING5 BHALL BE COMPRISED OF FORMS MATERIALS, AND COLORS THAT ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL QUALRIEB OF THE FRIMART BIILDIRS, PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BWLOMG DOVEEACE Td/: HINIHWI OPEN SPACE 15v. BUILD TO 0-20FROM FREFERTI LME MAXIMUM BWLDMG HEIGHT 20' MIN 115' MAX (5 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 HINIMIUI PEEN SPACE 15% MINIMUM SETBACK FROM FROPERY 10' FROM EASE FROEERY LINE MAXIMUM BWLDMG HEIGHT 35' MAX (3 STORIES) JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS & 14 n & L'/ NIGHOLA3 GARI EXCEPT THAT FORTXGN OCNVEYEO TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN A GEED RECORDED FEBFUVl vet W IN DOCK 1999 AT PAGE 350. A POK110N OF THE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTOR 24 TOWNSHIP 3 BOUNI RANGE fiB WEST OF THE 5e PM COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. 517ATE OF WL014D0 CONTAINING 22M ACRES MORE OR .ESB ( 1101541 BE H- f WHEAT RIDGE - WARD STATION PPL LONE W 49TH STREET F w w H ¢ w O Tn ~ Z O ¢ O c� Z Q WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROA Q ¢ ¢ Q PROJECT TEAM OWNER ARCHITECT: JM5 LAKE HOLDINGS, LLP THINK TAW STUDIO, NO. leis SOUTH LAKE ROAD ED BOX TBI LAKEWOOD CO 50221 FREDERICK CO BM30 CONI MARK JOLSrAD CONTACT: PATRICK BERREND 303-618-6663 ARCHITECT NCARB 303-960-9925 SURVEYOR SURVEY CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AI AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RI CONSJLTANTs BOULDER COLORADO FO AHN 420 21st AVENUE iedwo CONTACT ROBERT J. RIIBINO PLS fJr, CO E0501 (303) 464-9515 Cosph IACI: JOEL SERMONS, PE, CON 303-651-6626 VICINITY MAP: SHEET INDEX: CDP1 CO VER SHEET ODP 2 LAND USES MAP 0 60' 120' 2p0 GRAPFI1�200'-0 The heave sloni carvre s) or 4paIN desYpatel asof thereat da ferany agree that ire picpaM Map 14 doxnbel M1eraon will be de.Aopeci as a Planned Deveoposent mdatce wan me uvea, espoeeon and mrsol In aontarneci In the plan aM as may othawlse be Iepural by law. I Wren further ruugnze trat the approval of a boonllg K Mems Deielopmery and Hotel of No K Aline development plan, does nor omdd5 a :vested prcpeffy ANY Vestnd PDAUMA hunts Toy UNy ANA Are Beef J Meant B tie PAYRo s of 5x1bn 20-121 M lira Meal Potly Cala Of teas. (Mark Job,ad -U J State of Oobredo ) ) Be CWln,y be Jefferson ) The lwaprg Irisiruren[ xas an noNadged beere ne the obs of _ AD. 20 by — Wiliness my hard and cffeal deal My once 'cn expire', NMan PLUG DARVEyOR'B CERTIRCATE on heeey DEBTS that lie snrvz/ Of fie We many al JMS Lake Hoeral LLC was made bN ma or user my deet aupersonn and M Ve hest of My knoeAage, hfwmaaon and bear in aoroNance Berle all ReAmbe Colorado snob A,, amort passe] patch as a> lay IRA accerneernng wan awveRy rapre dif sad ,n VN Aumewrw Beau BRrewre COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE ) so county of Jefferson ) I lamely aTM1ty trat An plan was lied In 4e often of the Camry Clerk and Feoor@r of Jeffereon County at Gocyre CAbado, at oAcO—M on tie �dayof D,In Book MAI Respina, No — JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER By Dons PLANNING COMMISSION CER RICATION fRefommeMed for apparel The day of Rline WRtCode PIBmFg Overall Chanhassen OLD CEFTFCATION Appov d To day of by tie Vaheat Rlgp (AE Counsel ATTEST As Clerk Mayor CUMMI Derebpmert IMI 00 THINKTANK ■■S t u a I o anoedue u2v:EeNry sav= JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS & 14 n & u NICHOI AS GARI E=EPT T T PORTION CO KEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HIGWAYSU STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY A ENS IN BWK RBB AT PAGE 9B6 A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST V4 OF SECTION N,, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUSTSth RANGE SB WEST OF HE PM COUNTYCOUNTY. / UY OF JEFFERSON STATETOF COWORNDO I E INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT CONTAINING UM ACRES MORE OR LESS (91M124838 SF I/ SEE NOTE 4 LL 0 < BUILDING PAD Q o SEE NOTE 2 N PLANNING AREA 1 C5 �< �AONEMO� 4.86 ACRES ' ?EN o SEE NOTE 3 OQ�� YAG Q c� OVA, kR� SEE (NOTE 4 1-70 BUILDING PAD I O SEE NOTE G PEN SPACE PLANNING AREA 2 17.87 ACRES WARD POND SITE 8 V►A NDARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT c pc)E NORTH SEE NOTE 4 ro PARKING U � 0 (-T) \L BUILDING PAD m EL SEE NOTE 2 w co PARKING O 6m' Il0' SKETCH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE I" - 60'-O" LAND SUMMARY PLANNING AREA 4G6 ACRES PLANNING AREA 2 Il.9l ACRES TOTAL 51TE 22.13 ACRE5 PERMITTED USES ALLOWED USES PA -I PA -2 RESIDENTIAL INCLUDING: P A55157EP LIVING FACILITY P DWELLIFS, MULTIPLE P DWELLING LIVE / WOMAN P RESIDENTIAL GROUP HOME P PuguC, CINC AND INSTIMUTOJAL INCLUDING: COn IT 5WILDIbGS IN0.UDIbG LIBRARIES, MUSEUMS P PARKS, 0R SPACE AND PLAZAS P PUBLIC FREE MID BWLDINGS P RECREATION FACILITIES, INDOOR P URBAN GARDENS P UTILITIES. MINOR P COMMERCIAL SERVICES AND RETAIL ANIMAL DAYCARE P P RANKS AND PIN6NCIAL INS MI - NO DRI VE THRJ P P BARS, TAVERNS, AND NIGHT CLUBS P P BED AND BREAKFAST P P DAY CARE CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P EATING ESTA IMINVENT P P FAST FOOD EATING ESTABLISHMEM P P MICROBREWERY, MICRODI5TILLERY WITH TAP ROOM P P MICRO PRULDRY, MIORODISTILLERY WITHOUT TAP ROOM P P BOAT RECREATIONAL VEHIOLE AND 1 ILER 5ALE5, RENTALS, 4 SERVICE P PERSONAL SERVICES P P PHOTOCOP) I AND PRINTING P P PRDDUCE STANDS P P RECREATION FACILITIES, COPRIERCIAL P P REPAIR RENTAL AND SERVICING OF BOATS - OUTDOOR STORAGE P RETAIL SALES UP TO 2OPOO GSL ADR ONE TENANT 5PACE P P URBAN GARDENS P P VETERMARY CLINIG9 AND HOSPITALS - NO OUTDOOR PINS P P HOBPITALRY AND ENTERTAINMENT AM STUDIOS GND GALLERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS, AND EXTENDED STAY LODGING P P STUDIOS INCLUDING ART, MJ51S,, DANCE, TELEVISION AND RADIO P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P P ANCILLARY L19E5 PAWING FACILITIES P P 7EhPCR4RY USES SPECIAL EVENTS INCLUDING FE57IYAL6 AND FARMERS MARKET P LEGEND: P PEWITTED USE NP NOT PERMITTED URF / EU SPECIAL U5E C CONDITIONAL SHEET NOTES: I) EA57E9N ACCESS TO THE S'IBJECT PROPERrc TRAVEFGG8 ADJACENT PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT'AADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES REFER TO'DECLARATION OF EASEMENT 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LANDSOAPMG, PARKING TO BE DETERMINED AT SDP SUBMITTAL 9) EMERGENCY SERVICE, INGRESS / EGRESS ONLY, 4)VEHICLE ACCE58 ME THINKTANK .■ a e a a I a ao EWcWn uRr:EeNpn MMaz 2019107984 111121201910:00 AM PGS 4 $28.00 DF $0.00 Electronically Recorded Jefferson County, CO George P Stern, Clerk and Recorder TD1000 N DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT This DECLARATION OF ACCESS EASEMENT ("Declaration") is made as of November 8, 2019 by JMS LAKE HOLDINGS LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("Owner"), as follows: RECITALS A. Owner is the fee owner of certain real property consisting of approximately 23.6 acres, located in Jefferson County, Colorado and more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Property"), B. West Interstate 70 Frontage Road North (the "Frontage Road") is a public street located adjacent to the north end of the Property, C. Lakemont Center Stage 2 subdivision borders the Property to the east and north, D. The Plat of Lakemont Center Stage 2 (the "Lakemont Plat") was recorded in the records of Jefferson County on September 7, 1989 at Reception No. 89077467, E. The Lakemont Plat establishes guaranteed access within its ingress -egress easements for those entering from recorded easements from adjacent properties and/or from abutting public streets (the "Guaranteed Access"), F. Tract A, Lakemont Center Stage 2 ("Tract A") is a 6,165 square foot, triangular parcel of land located between the northeast corner of the Property and the Frontage Road and is identified on the Lakemont Plat as part of an ingress -egress easement, and G. Owner desires that the Property be developed with access to the Frontage Road through Tract A pursuant to the ingress and egress rights granted under the Lakemont Plat. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the Property, agreements, easements and covenants contained herein, Owner hereby establishes and declares that the Property shall be owned, held, and conveyed, subject to the agreements, easements and covenants set forth in this Declaration. Upon recordation of this Declaration, any conveyance, transfer, sale, hypothecation, assignment, lease or sublease made by Declarant, or successors or assigns, shall be and is deemed to incorporate by reference the provisions of this Declaration, as the same may from time to time be amended. AGREEMENTS 1. Access Easement. Owner hereby establishes and grants a nonexclusive easement upon, over and across all portions of the Property for the purpose of vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress and right of access to and from Tract A (the "Easement"). 100753133.DOCX / 2 ) 2. Guaranteed Access. Upon recordation, this Declaration constitutes a recorded easement from an adjacent property owner and users of the Easement shall therefore be entitled to the Guaranteed Access established by the Lakemont Plat through Tract A. 2. Successors and Assigns. This Declaration and the easement created hereby shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon Owner, its heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns, and upon any person or entity acquiring the Property, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or otherwise. The easement contained in this Declaration shall be deemed to run with the land and shall bind each and every person and entity having any fee, leasehold or other interest in any part of the Property at any time and from time to time. 3. Modification and Termination. This Declaration and the easement created hereby may be modified in any respect whatsoever or terminated, in whole or in part, only with the consent of Owner at the time of such modification or termination, and then only by written instrument duly executed and acknowledged by Owner and recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County. 4. Recording. This Declaration shall be recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Jefferson County, Colorado. 5. Captions. The captions, section numbers, and index appearing in this Declaration are inserted only as a matter of convenience and in no way define, limit, construe, or describe the scope or intent of such sections or articles nor in any way affect this Declaration. 6. Applicable Law. This Declaration shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado. 7. Severability. If any term or provision of this Declaration or the application of it to any person or circumstance shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Declaration or the application of such term or provision to persons or circumstances, other than those as to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and each term and provision of this Declaration shall be valid and shall be enforced to the extent permitted by law. 8. No Rights in Public. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as creating any rights in the general public or as dedicating for public use any portion of the Property. 9. Non -Merger. Unless as otherwise amended by the Owner, this Agreement shall not be subject to the doctrine of merger. 100753133.DOCX / 2 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF. Owner has this day set its hand and sea]. TMS LAKE, HOLDINGS LLC, a Colorado limited liability company By: Nan Title STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledaed before me this day of 2019 by as of TMS Lake Holdings LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. Witness my hand and official sea]. YADIRA N. QARDUNO NOTARY PUSUC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20164016313 My COMMISSION EMAES APRIL 28,2M Notary Public My �ornmission Expires: A "i i� ll :007,53,t33,F)04C"\ -' � EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, STATE OF COLORADO, IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 21, 1968, IN BOOK 1999, AT PACE 368, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF LOT 12, FROM WHICH POINT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST BEARS NORTH 63'35'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1470.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 64'20'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 468.4 FEET; THENCE NORTH 79'14' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 497.1 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'45'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 314.5 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45*07'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 70.6 FEET: THENCE NORTH 00'00'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 122.1 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14*02'30'* WEST, A DISTANCE OF 103.1 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, SAME BEING THE EASTERLY PRESENT RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE (NOVEMBER, 1964) OF WARD ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE SAID EASTERLY PRESENT RIGHT-OF-WAY UNE, SOUTH 00-00'15' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 873.8 FEET TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 9, THE SAME BEING THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A DEDICATED ROAD; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF THE DEDICATED ROAD, NORTH 64'20'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1442.6 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS; THENCE ALONG THE SAID EAST LINE OF LOT 12, NORTH 00*16' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 88.6 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION DESCRIBED IN RULE AND ORDER RECORDED JANUARY 20, 1972, IN BOOK 2336, AT PAGE 579, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9 WHICH IS 161,7 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, THENCE SOUTH 9*55'45" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 203.0 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 0*00'15" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9, A DISTANCE OF 110.0 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4'00'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1142,9 FEET; THENCE NORTH 14'02'30" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 103.1 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9; THENCE NORTH 0'00'15" WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 9, A DISTANCE OF 352.5 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 27, 1988, AT RECEPTION NUMBER 88105019, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS - A PORTION OF TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT 9; THENCE SOUTH 0'18'19' EAST (ASSUMED BEARING), ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 9, A DISTANCE OF 43.98 FEET 70 THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M,; THENCE SOUTH 0*15'12" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST LINE, 55.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 12*14'03" EAST, 45.81 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY, ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 27.00 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 73-15'10"; THENCE NORTH 85*29'12" EAST 221.14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89'07'50' EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12, A DISTANCE OF 366.43 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 974-00 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14*20'54"; THENCE SOUTH 76'31'16" EAST, 16.17 FEET: THENCE EASTERLY, ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTH, HAVING A RADIUS OF 367.03 FEET, AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 49*12*05", TO THE NORTH LINE OF TRACTS 9, 10, 11 AND 12; THENCE SOUTH 89'07'50 WEST, 1178.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 100753133.DOCX / 2 1 THINK TANK s t U d l o architecture urban design interiors 24 -June -19 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Lauren Mikulak— Planning Manager Reference: 1MS Lake Holdings, LLC— Request for Rezone Application w/ ODP Dear Ms. Mikulak: e letter of request will be included staff reports to Planning immission and City Council and ould be updated for that purpose. Please see the attached Land Use Case Processing Application and supporting ODP materials for your review and consideration of the 1MS Lake Holdin s LLC re uest for re -zoning of the subject parcel located at the NE corner of Ward Road and Interstate Most recently this ens). was a fishing pond Scope: The owner (applicant) proposes to a -zone the 22.73 acre subject parcel from its current Agricultural Two (Ag -Two) designation to the Mixed Use Comme 'al Transit Oriented Development (MU -C TOD) to provide the flexibility for the future redevelopment of this former gravel mine site. The proposed project scope will entail a mix of commercial, retail and residential uses surrounding a private lake and linear park. We are proposing two planning areas for consideration: A mo -family residential community is proposed for the upper Planning Area 1 and will consist o id -rise, medium densit partments with complementary retail amenities atop structured parking integrated and concealed within the existing site to The purpose of this application Is to change the street and local pedestrian corridors and will also further take adv the zoning which will allow for a wider range and pedestrian access to the linear park and the lakefr The lowe house a retail marine dealership &service facility, a wakeboard c of uses. Ultimately, your goal is to develop ater-front character a these two specific uses. Reframe this mischaracterization - zoned ag, used for paragraph to that effect. fishing and as open space. Review Criteria: We believe this request for re -zone meets the intent d requirements of §26-303.D of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code for the following reasons: 1. We believethe rehabilitation of th' ormerindustrial site othe benefitof life, safety and welfareof thesubject property and community at -large. The proposed development will allow the applicant the ability to incorporate community enhancing businesses and amenities which will ameliorate the previous derelict use of the property. Further, the integration of this property with the surrounding TOD development is an inherent benefit not only to the applicant, but also to the future residents, business operators and the surrounding community as a whole. P.O. Box 781, Frederick, Colorado 80530-0781 © 303.997.4948 the request is to rezone to PMUD not MU -C TOD 2. The proposed concept for Planning Area 1 and Planning ould only be accomplished with the inherent flexibility afforded by a mixed-use zone district Tarh-a7folt�. 3. Present locations of municipal infrastructure including site accesses, fire -protection and site utilities will be suitable for the applicant to connect. The applicant will provide for the Be more specific. Review comp required to facilitate connection to municipal services. plan, subarea plan, and vision 4. Review Criteria Conditions: plan. Tell the story. a. We believe the proposed request for re -zone is in complete alignment with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan as well as with the overall nature and character of the RTD - Transit Oriented This statement is Development currently in progress one block to the north of this site. too generic otApplicable c. e believe that the adjacent RTD — Transit Oriented Development is so broad in its positive effects on this area of Wheat Ridge, that it is indeed in the interest of the community to encourage redevelopment of this site at this time. d. Not Applicable ODP Checklist Criteria: RTD owns the Wheat Ridge - Ward Station Private entities such as yourselves are bringing transit oriented development We believe the proposed request for change of zone district is fundamentally necessary for the applicant to rehabilitate this property in virtually any manner due to the limitations of the current Ag -Two zoning district. Since the conclusion of gravel mining operations on this site, it has been largely left derelict and is a blight on one of the main gateways into Wheat Ridge. The proposed rehabilitation will focus on the positive aspects o this site such as the lake and the topography and use them to best advantage to create a vibrant community that would co plement and enhance the current development occurring in the immediate vicinity of this site. We believe the scale andnsity of proposed development would also be commensurate to that which is being developed in the immediate vicinity. .1;nmp (rnanv?) In \A/R will not is as blighted but as ag/open space/ c is currently being studied in conjunction with CDOT and the City of service City and tthe needs of the development and restrictions on the adjacent arteriaN. voc oc ccc t utt carelearmz... owns none of the'ng Area 1 will be from the 1-70 Frontage Road — North, approximately mid -block, a minimum of 350 feet East utilities --only storm o The proposed access to Planning Area 2 will be the historic access pointjust past the apex of the curve on sewer tag Road — North. There is presently a curb -cut at this location and there is an access and drainage easement op atthislocation tofacilitate access tothe peninsula site potential for access off Ward Municipal utilities e all presently contained within the 1-70 Frontage Road — North, and the connections will be proposed at or near t e site access points identified for Planning Area 1 & Planning Area 2. Preliminary inquiry with Arvada Fire Protection has indicated feasibility for the proposed uses and access points, but the engineering of fire protection water service needs to each site has yet to be determined. To conclude, we again believe this application for re -zoning of the subject parcel is in keeping of the intent and statutory guidelines outlined in the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code and further believe this proposal to be complementary and synergistic with the development activities underway in the immediate vicinity. We look forward to receiving your input and feedback on this proposal. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or should you require further information. Regards: Patrick Berrend —Architect, NCARB Enclosures: ODP Application Materials CHARACTEoF EVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JMs LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC. MIXED THE DE VELLAiENT Is TO REHABILITATE THIS FORMER GR4 FEL MINE 517E INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SURROJNDIW A PRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL MID UNIQUE AMENITY FOR THE RESIDENTS AND PATRONS OF THIS DEVELCFEBNT AND THE GREATER COMPUNITY Abe less on end F MULTIFAMILY I AND WILL CpIST OF Is PROPOSED FOR THE UPPER BANNING AREA I AND WILL CONSIST OF MID -RISE APARTMENTS ATGP PARK ANO LAKEFRCA T THE LOWER PENINSULA SITE N PLANNING AREA 2 IS PROPOSED TO HOUSE A NAIL MARINE DEALERSHIP FACILITY, A WAKEBOARD CABLE PARI AND A FEATURE RESTAURANT THE DESIGN IMENT FOR THIS AREA 15 TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE INHERENT WATER FRONT CHARACTER AND DEVELOP THE ARCHITEcnRE. THE LANDSCAPE AND THE 51TE AMENInEs INTO A DESTNATIO, THE KEY PROXIMRY AND VISIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARD ROAD, AND WARD SPREB7 STATION CORRIDORS WILL OTHER A UNIQUE LEVEL OF VITALITY AND COMMUNITY 5YNE GY THAT WILL BE FURTHER ENHANCED BY THE OVERALL COMPLEMENTARY ARC411H IURAL, LANDSCAPE AND GOI9MINITT DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH BANNNG AREAS CASE HISTORY WZ-1&03 19 THIS UTLINE DEVELOFMETNT PLA Ilt�l IFIL DE 1EM5 SUCH AS 61 LAYO ONG ARCHRECnff HAVE NOT BEEN ON } NT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC DEVELOP'IENT LAV MUST ND AFFROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE HE 5UEMITTAL 1 - -WAY OR BWLONG PE ATION AND ANr sI10BEWENr sltE DE OUTDOOR STORAGE: - BOATS TO BE DISPLAYED MID INVENTOR! STORED, IN PART, IN OUTDOOR AREA COMP—Mi WITH WHEAT ROUE CODE SECTION 26-628. STANDARDS FOR OF-511REET VEHICULAR PARKMfi, BICYCLE PARKING, AND LOADING: PARKIW FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS 54OULO BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF BUILDINGS, FUND STRJCNTsED PARKING IS ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL. FREE-STANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PROPOSED USE. BICYCLE PARKING ANO VEHICULAR LOADNG FOR PASSENGERS AND, AS APPROPRIATE, MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE FRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRICTURES SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPNG AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE PROM THE FRIMAR! ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AGAIIIIISIR11VII, ACCEBBORI B7RU 7CaRE8 SHALL BE ALLOWED, PROVIDED THAT 7OL1L FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY E£ROENT OF THE FOOTPRINT 01 He IRE BRIM41iff STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES ON materials, and colors that are ble with the architectural qualities of PROJECT TEAM OWNER : STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC THIPoK TAW BnDIO, INIC. DE VELOP E NT ELBMENTB SUCH AS BITE LAYOUT AND BWLDNG ARCHITECTURE PO BOX TBI HAVE NOT BEEN ADDRESSED ON THIS OOCIPPNT. AS A RESULT, A SPECIFIC FDERICK. CO 80530 RE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND AFFRJVED BY THE CITY OF ler DSl ng MU WHEAT FACGE PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR BUILDING 3 standards PERMIT APPLICATION AND ANY 51185EL:IENT 517E OEVELOr-HENT. are more ofiALL PARKING SHALL BE IN IXTePOP1ANCE WI7H SECTION 26-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. CIVIL ENGINEER: ALL LAND`LAPMG SHALL BE IN CdJFOR-IANCE WITH SECTION 36-501 OF THE ROCKY RIDGE CONBULTNNT5 WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. 420 21st AVENUE ALL ENTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BEM CONNORMANCE WITH 5EOTION 26-503 LgNGMONT, CO 89501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS CONTACT: JOEL BEAMONB, PE. FENCING SHALL BE IN CONFORMMICE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT 303-651-6626 ROBE CODE OF LAWS. N1 ALL SIGNAGE SHALL HE IN COnFO AND WITH A TIC VII OF THE WHEAT RIDGECODEGFLAWS BILLBOARDS ARE PRO MI BITED. -A ARCHITEONR4L, SITE, AND 5TREET5CAPE DESIGN SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE ARCHItECNRAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL (ASOM) AND S7ffETSCAPE ANIMAL DE IGN OUTDOOR STORAGE: - BOATS TO BE DISPLAYED MID INVENTOR! STORED, IN PART, IN OUTDOOR AREA COMP—Mi WITH WHEAT ROUE CODE SECTION 26-628. STANDARDS FOR OF-511REET VEHICULAR PARKMfi, BICYCLE PARKING, AND LOADING: PARKIW FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS 54OULO BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF BUILDINGS, FUND STRJCNTsED PARKING IS ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL. FREE-STANDING COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PROPOSED USE. BICYCLE PARKING ANO VEHICULAR LOADNG FOR PASSENGERS AND, AS APPROPRIATE, MERCHANDISE, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE FRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRICTURES SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPNG AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE PROM THE FRIMAR! ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AGAIIIIISIR11VII, ACCEBBORI B7RU 7CaRE8 SHALL BE ALLOWED, PROVIDED THAT 7OL1L FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY E£ROENT OF THE FOOTPRINT 01 He IRE BRIM41iff STRUCTURE OR STRUCTURES ON materials, and colors that are ble with the architectural qualities of PROJECT TEAM OWNER : ARCHITECT: JMB LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC THIPoK TAW BnDIO, INIC. ISE SOUTH LARGE ROAD PO BOX TBI LAKEWOOD CO 50231 FDERICK. CO 80530 RE CONI H ARD JOLSTAD CONTACT: PATRICK BERREND 303-61B-6663 ARCHITECT NCARB U 303-560-9325 SURVEYOR RLBINO SURVEYING CIVIL ENGINEER: 3312 AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE CONBULTNNT5 BOULDER COLORADO W301 420 21st AVENUE CONTACT: ROBERT J. FBI PLS LgNGMONT, CO 89501 (393)464-3515 CONTACT: JOEL BEAMONB, PE. L- 303-651-6626 JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TguCTS 9, tW M 6 t2 NICHOLAS GnrmENS, E)CEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF 1101- AY$ STATE OF COLORADO IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRILl K 18691N BOOK IM AT PAGE 964 A PORTON OF THE NORTHEAST VO OF SECTION Zl TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH. RANGE W WEST BE THE BN P.M. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 ACRES MORE OR LESS ( 99024638 SF 4-1 Map does not need to be this large, shrink to accommodate other items as requested in comment letter WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD Q 0 1-70 ALL VICINITY MAP:°moo SHEET INDEX: CDP1 1 CO VER SHEET OOP 21 LAND USE MAP Tire bebry Named ofsaya a or baby, designated ag IIIs), Thereof do tereby agree Fat My pmperty legally Wei brawn wit be bera'cryb as a Planned Dodrelopmerld In aammnaa arab He uses, resonators and osmoons wntare] IF Ins plan, add as may omewley be negdne! W w I v+@) famar reogl5e Met line eppmrel o1 a r®drg P Planned Daebpment, and apposad W this outlre be a'cgna'11 plan, tices not create N rested idea ty hard Foonad pv„eM dgMs may only apse and aboard Fureient to the prniems of Sai 26-121 of toe Wheat Rkke Code of taws, Near: nam of oat W or aseemN aro WII sun) State of alaram I I e5 Ces rrty of anason 1 Tire ibegoing Imu mart was aclwaoi before rte lab �y of ,AD 2o_ry Witness my MW aM olfical sear My wammssm sapme Nmaw B,bre SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE tic Total mrtll�Met Ad aray of He bwrtEry of (JMS Take Holtlings) ass rtaa dry, ma or under my direst supwisRon ars to To best of mN Maddape, Indarmatlm and Wslaf In abided offir all 'dla Cobsm starew s, rrwt reNsad iii as seemed the accomoadeng dart accuretdy maysiams sad surae, (Sresurs MAD 5greture State of Cbbodo I 1 ss aunty of Jefferson I 1 rcrsbv Jai that Ins pen ads Had in due otfioe of me county Cook and Record of Je feren, county at Go en Cdaadq ai Mlwk—M on the say of —%D, IN Book_ Page_ , Re.2pocn No JEFFERSON CONNI CLERK AND RECORDER BY Di PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION TRewrtnendea for approval InTN day of X the VRwet Head Planning Commssbo. CRY CERTIFICATION Apiaretl His Jay of Ed me Wrest Podgy Cry Cmnd ATTEST city Mark Mayor Commmity Dsra'c(malrt Diector ■■ THINKTANK ■■ arcrmscwrs uman cesign manes petrlck barren - arClSec( arab p(Phaolb303-99 Wtlloret (pbanel 903-997-9915 (metals) 303-960-9925 AN 143naXEW GF PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ®DP 1 Jos NUMBER I� W Z U —j W m Z L- it N1 W l -A z — W W Q —j U1 0 � H i� cit _ W W W 4V V 0 fY Nq Z F- A 0 Q W KI L- W W W AN 143naXEW GF PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ®DP 1 Jos NUMBER w 0 w Q U LL] O U O Ward Rd JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, CO Show linear TRACTS S Un6> NICHOUS GAFOENS pardandped E%GEPFTHAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE OEPL OF Gonnectlons HIGHVIAY$ STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED PERRI K 18891N GOOK IM AT PAGE 984 VEHICLE A PORTION OF THE NiNVO OF SECTION SIX TOWNSHIP 9 SOUTH. JEFFERSON. ST VIEBT OF THE Dth PM ACCESS,, / CNSHIP OF UTH.R RANGE T COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 ACRES MORE OR LESS 199029838 SF 4-1 I -E INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT ANG PAD NAL BUILDING AREA T.B.D. SEE NOTE 2 Open space and slope protection area? 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH PLANNING KGS ICLE BUILDING PAD AREA 1 e C ACCESS FINAL BUILDING AREA T.B.D. 4.86 ACRESl.o• SEE E 2 o a...n n...- Trerr eGbbi a ar a°tleb �.m'•SO � ' '•P•o forams`Ia duPldecing. p P trail along water, l if tentative �0 PLANNING AREA 2 17.87 ACRES WARD POND Sift#�OUNOARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AREA 2 PLAWJIFA'a AREA 485 ACRE5 Increase percentage PLANNING AREA 1 TOTAL 517E MINIMUM LANDSCAPE COVERAGE 15%51NSLE USE DEVELOFt1ENT MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 10Y MINIMUM LANDSCAPE COVERAGE 10% MIXED 0.5E DEVELOP' NT 10' may prevent accessory Str MINIMUM PERIMETER 5E75ACK MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN SLOGS. 30' MAXIMJM BUILDING HEIGHT 20' MIN. 90' 92.1X. f6 BTORIE51 MINIMUM PERIMETER SE7540K 10' MINIMUM 5EPAR4TION BETWEEN BLDGB 30' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 20MIN. 115' MAX (5 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 PLAWJIFA'a AREA 485 ACRE5 MAXIMJM EUILDIFG COVERAGE 25% TOTAL 517E MINIMUM LANDSCAPE COVERAGE 15%51NSLE USE DEVELOFt1ENT 10' may prevent accessory Str MINIMUM PERIMETER 5E75ACK MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN SLOGS. 30' MAXIMJM BUILDING HEIGHT 20' MIN. 90' 92.1X. f6 BTORIE51 NOTE 1 onow as venlonOr dreulat on path PARKING Q ID BUILDING PAD m SEE NOTE 2 w Must be resolved LAND SUMMARY PLAWJIFA'a AREA 485 ACRE5 PLAWJIFA'a AREA : Il9l ACRE5 TOTAL 517E n,13 ADRE5 LEGEND: P FERIITED ILSE NP NOT F1 WIITTED USE 511 SFECIAL USE C CONDITIONAL phot Frogs Wing SHEETNOTES, IIIrgs U EASTERN AGGEGS TO THE 5'I5JECT FRGPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACROSS THE TRACT 'A' ADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROUTES ffSCLUTI TJ W EASEMENT RIGHTS AND FINAL DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION 19 PETIDING, 0 60' 120' 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, 51DE.al LANDBCAPING, PARKINS TO BE SKETCH PLAN DETERMINED AT SOP S' MITTAL Jctu 1CtUFes GRAPHIC SCALE: I" = 60'-0" RedUCe THINKTANK ■■2 t . a I o arcnnecwre uman ceSgn me"i Petrick beneM - sI ii psirlckml 303-9kaWtlloret (Phi903-997-9925 (rtCy1e)303-880-8825 w PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ®®P 2 Jos NUMBER City of �Wheat.p COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29' Ave. July 25, 2019 Patrick Berrend Think Tank Studio PO Box 781 Frederick, CO 80530 Mr. Berrend: Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 This letter is in regards to your application for approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A- 2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan. I have reviewed your first submittal and have the following comments. Please also refer to the redlined copies of the draft documents, Public Works comments, and materials provided by the utility districts. General Comments 1. Comment Responses: Please use the provided Word file of this letter to respond to the subsequent comments and provide it as part of the second submittal. 2. Project Name: Staff recommends against using an LLC as the title of the planned development in the event the property changes ownership. Use something like "Ward Road Pond" instead. Change the title on both pages and also change "Commercial" to "Mixed Use." 3. Formatting: Make sure the margins on all sheets meet Jefferson County standards for plats (1" top, '/z" sides and bottom). If approved, you will print the ODP on full size (24" x 36") mylars and the City will deliver them to the County. 4. Water Rights: It is your responsibility to contact the ditch companies for both ditches on the property and resolve any water rights issues, easements, maintenance agreements, and construction requirements prior to hearings. The ditch companies may have specific requirements or requests such as piping the ditch versus leaving it as an open channel. Occasionally ditches can be vacated if water rights are purchased or the company is dissolved. Provide written acknowledgment of the plans from the ditch companies. The pond will also be affected by development on this site and the effects of development on its banks need to be considered. Does the property owner have the rights to modify, drain, or fill the pond as needed? Have you contacted the Mile High Flood District? While the specifics of these plans will be at time of Specific Development Plan (SDP) review, it is crucial to understand the limitations imposed by the ditches prior to undergoing a detailed planning/engineering process. 5. Traffic: The traffic study needs to take into account the highest trip generating land use allowed under the ODP, as well as the most likely land use (multifamily residential and/or a corporate office building). The report needs to consider the following: trip generation, distribution of those trips including realistic travel direction, and impact on intersections especially the Frontage Road at Ward Road. Distribution analysis may include several different access point scenarios; refer to access comments below (Sheet 2). CDOT requires a full traffic study to grant access permits, including potential modifications to existing access points. Consider public access to Ward Road www.ci.wheatridge. co.us in the study, based on what CDOT engineers decide is appropriate. This report should be provided prior to or at the second submittal of the ODP. Comments on the report will be provided then. 6. Framing ofApplication: The purpose of an ODP is to outline a land use and circulation framework. The submittal does not reflect much of the guidance that has been given to date. Refer to attached examples for formatting notes, development standards, use tables, and the sketch plan. Some of the comments provided below are high-level rather than focused on specific details of the ODP document. Once the plan and concept is refined and resubmitted based on the comments below, staff may have more specific comments on development standards, uses, and site planning. A zone change from A-2 to PMUD and from a former fishing pond to a high density residential development is a significant request, and the onus will be on the applicant team to tell the story of this project in the public hearing setting. The letter of request does not match the ODP the letter is very specific to the apartment and boat dealer uses, but the ODP is too generic. The letter does not sufficiently respond to the zone change criteria or reflect research of the City's Comprehensive Plan, Northwest Subarea Plan, and Vision Document. A planned development is a negotiated zoning and the ODP and letter should tell the story of how the project fulfills the City's goals. There will be members of the community who disagree with development of ag- zoned open space no matter how close to the station; do not take this for granted. Reference the RTD G Line commuter rail station (Wheat Ridge - Ward Station) by name in the letter. Refer to attached redlines of your application letter. ODP Document Sheet 1 7. Add the following case numbers to Case History: WZ-19-03. The text in this section can be removed since it is also in Standard ODP Notes. 8. Wheat Ridge is two words. Please check the entire document and make these corrections where necessary. 9. Add the owner's name and relation to the LLC to the Owner's Certificate. 10. Remove the parentheses from the Surveyor's Certificate and change the project name to match the document title. 11. The Vicinity Map can be significantly reduced in size and needs to be zoomed out to show the vicinity and serve that purpose. Some text on the next page can be moved to the front page (specific suggestions are below). If part of the rationale for the zone change is the adjacency to the Wheat Ridge - Ward Station, change the extent of the map to show the station area to the north. 12. Add "of' to Character of Development. 13. The Character of Development statement is too specific, especially in the 2°d and 3`d paragraphs, which mention specific uses that would be approved under future SDPs. Removing specific references to multi -family and the boat dealership would be helpful, but still mention the items such as addressing the street, taking advantage of local topography, pedestrian access, and recreational use of the pond. This is your opportunity to tell the story of why the site is a good redevelopment opportunity, not to focus on specific end users. Also note that the site is considered a "Primary Gateway" into the City of Wheat Ridge. The project proposes transit - supportive uses and densities and supports the City's recreational vision, but this does not translate in what is written. 14. In Standard ODP Notes: a. Only the first note is a "Standard ODP Note." The rest should be consolidated with the PA notes on page 2 so that all of the development standards are consolidated into one place. Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP b. Consider using the parking standards from the Mixed Use section of the code, Section 26- 1109. This code section provides more flexibility for determining parking requirements, incentivizes shared parking, and still adheres to standard parking dimensions from Section 26-501. c. Add "design" between Streetscape and Manual. d. Signage: i. You can choose to prohibit billboards if you wish, just say "Billboards are prohibited" after the "All signage..." sentence above. Refer to redlines. ii. Remove this section, including the address signs bullet point. e. Outdoor Storage: i. Staff is not supportive of other outdoor storage besides boats/boat inventory to be displayed. Remove the second bullet point. ii. Staff may request additional screening requirements and landscape buffers as part of the SDP review for the boat dealership. Standards for Accessory Structures: i. Remove "and outdoor storage, display and sales." ii. Where would accessory structures be appropriate? Would this be specific to PA2 or would they be allowed on PAl also? 30% is rather large but could allow for out - sheds, storage garages, or community buildings. iii. Add the sentence: "Accessory buildings shall be composed of forms, materials, and colors that are compatible with the architectural qualities of the primary building." Sheet 2 15. Two points of access should be shown for Planning Area 1 (PAl). It will likely be a requirement of the fire department. It also will help distribute trips amongst two entrances since relying on a single point of access can be problematic. Don't preclude access onto Ward Road, even if it is required to be a right -in, right -out entrance. This should be shown as a "potential" access point. 16. Show vehicular circulation on the plan. It is important to understand where potential entrances will be and how internal streets and alleys will connect. We understand this is all preliminary and subject to change, but the plan as shown is too vague. The drive aisle on the peninsula should be shown as part of this circulation network. a. Where is parking proposed for PAl? Character of Development describes structured parking as an option. b. Have fire truck turnarounds and access routes been considered? 17. Show pedestrian circulation on the plan. It is helpful to show the future linear park to the northeast and how this site could interface with it. This should include the location of the pedestrian amenities along the shoreline and/or ditch. It should connect to the required pedestrian improvements on Ward Road and to the Frontage Road. 18. Show proposed open space areas on the plan. Appropriate locations are along the water between PAl and the pond. Will there be a publicly accessible trail adjacent to the lake to complement the City's vision of a linear park and recreational amenities? Be clear about those commitments in the visual and in writing. We request that publicly -accessible recreation amenities are provided. 19. Although drainage can be into the pond, water quality areas and swales will likely be required as part of the site planning process. Consider the locations of these facilities on the ODP. 20. Label the northern ditch and label both ditches by their names. Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP 21. Among the primary purposes of an ODP is to explain a circulation framework. To that end, the location of the access point at the northeast discussed in Note 1 needs to be resolved prior to hearings for the ODP since it relies on a separate private property owner. Keep us updated on the status of the resolution of the easement rights. The proposed configuration requires access through an adjacent property under separate ownership, and should not be approved until an agreement has been reached or an additional access easement has been recorded at the County. No hearings will be scheduled without this resolved. Otherwise, the entrance needs to be entirely on the subject property which we realize causes site grading and developability issues. 22. Previously we had discussed borrowing some permitted uses from the mixed-use chart (Sec 26- 1111), but this table is far too detailed and makes no differentiation between the PAs in terms of allowed uses. I also previously mentioned not having any conditional uses, so it's unclear why that was included, and some permitted uses don't fit for this site. Reconsider the formatting of this table, the inclusion of some uses, and further differentiate between PA1 and PA2 to provide a clear vision for each area with the allowed uses. It makes sense to only show the uses that are permitted, and delete any prohibited uses because by default they wouldn't be allowed if they're not included. It's likely the list will get a lot shorter for each. Some thoughts: a. Residential uses are not appropriate for PA2. b. All conditional uses (such as bail bonds) should be removed. c. Some uses are inappropriate for either PA such as motor vehicle sales, duplexes/townhomes (not viable because of topography), places of worship, and schools. d. Boat sales should not be included in PAL e. It's possible PA1 could only include: multifamily residential, office (medical or corporate), and supportive commercial services to multifamily or office (retail, restaurants, personal services, etc.). f The allowed uses in PA2 need to provide enough resiliency in the event the boat dealership does not move forward. They should include boat sales/repair, recreational uses, restaurant/breweries, retail, offices, other personal services, but not residential, institutional uses, or industrial. g. The graphic and use chart do not take into consideration the possibility of filling in some of the pond (northeast corner) as was previously discussed. This should be considered now. h. Please note the use chart may take a couple iterations to get right. The point of the use chart is to help tell the story to elected officials and provide guidance for future staff and users of the site. 23. Consolidate development standards charts in the bottom left corner and combine these standards with the Standard ODP Notes on the first page (all but the first note are development standards). Together they could become a Development Standards section. Comments on each chart are below (#24 and #25). 24. Planning Area 1 Chart: a. Remove lot size and dimension lines. b. There is no density cap in this area, unless you want to self -impose a density limitation. Given that one of the options is multifamily, it may not be worth choosing a limitation again this is part of the story telling. Remove this and "gross density." This information can be provided at SDP. c. Explain the proposed 10' perimeter setbacks. Have you considered a build -to zone and percentage requirement along the Frontage Road? This would ensure the future building appropriately addresses the street. A standard build -to is 0'-20' from the property line, Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP with at least 40% of that area occupied by building; the percentage could be modified as you see fit since the topography and shape of the lot could make that challenging. The ODP sets all development standards for future site plans so it's important to set realistic standards that allow the type of development you seek. d. We don't care about separation between buildings in this instance unless that's a standard you want to self -impose or to meet a specific fire code requirement. e. For landscape coverage, the MU code requires 75% of the required open space to be usable. Please include this standard as a subset of the 10% required landscaping. 10% seems low for a site of this size and shape given the topography and existing conditions. 25. Planning Area 2 Chart: a. Remove lot size and dimension lines. b. Since no residential uses will be allowed, remove net and gross density. c. Setbacks may not be relevant in this PA since the only place for a building is on the large part of the peninsula Only a setback from the east property line should be established. d. Same comment as above on building separation. This provision could limit accessory structures such as sheds if a user wanted them next to the primary building. e. Reduce the maximum building height. A 6 -story building is not appropriate on the small peninsula area. 3 stories or 35' is more appropriate. f Does the maximum building coverage take into account the entire 17.97 acres of PA2 or just the peninsula? If it's the entire area, 25% would allow a much larger building. We don't need to have a maximum building coverage; it is worth clarifying how much of the site must remain as water if you propose to fill in part of the pond. 26. The building pads should be shown as rectangles. Understanding that the locations are conceptual, think practically about the constructability of the building locations for multifamily and retail. The exact locations and shapes do not need to be determined, but the bubbles shown are too conceptual and graphically not appropriate for an ODP document. Refer to attached example for graphic style. For future consideration 27. Subdivision Plat: A subdivision will be required if you desire to reconfigure the existing lots, or create new lots. Let me know when you are ready to submit an application. Due to the number of existing lots, a Planning Commission hearing will be required. If the number of lots created is equal to or greater than 6, a City Council hearing will also be required. Based on the ODP, it makes sense to have PAl and PA2 be on separate lots and eventually with separate ownership. Confirm this is the case. It is also acceptable to process the subdivision plat at the time of the first Specific Development Plan. 28. Parkland Dedication Fee: All new residential development is subject to parkland dedication based on the number of new units created. Fees are $2,021.62 per new unit. These fees will be assessed prior to recordation of the Specific Development Plan. The application was also sent on referral to other City departments and outside agencies. Attached are the comments that were received. Wheat Ridge Public Works: See attached letter and redlines from Jordan Jefferies, dated July 12, 2019. See comments regarding surveying work; please follow the attached surveying instructions to ensure the surveyor is on the City Datum. More specific comments will be provided on the traffic study and future SDP/plat submittals; a full traffic impact study will be required in the future. Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP Wheat Ridge Building Division: No comments at this time. Wheat Ridge Economic Development: No comments at this time. Wheat Ridge Police Department: No objections. Valley Water District: See attached letter from Kathleen M. Kadnuck, dated July 3, 2019. Please coordinate with the district directly regarding water service. Fruitdale Sanitation District: No comments at this time. Continue working with the district on service plans. Arvada Fire Protection District: See attached comments from Steven Parker. More detailed comments will be provide in the future when specific site plans are received for review. Colorado Department of Transportation: No response. Please contact CDOT directly regarding access onto Ward Road, access permits, potential roadway improvements, and their requirements for traffic studies. Working with CDOT as soon as possible is crucial to the success of the project. Xcel Energy: See attached letter from Donna George, dated July 5, 2019; comment are generic at this time because there is no specific proposal. Neel recommends reaching out to their department that helps developers and builders do long term site planning. Refer to the attached email from Tony Pietras for more information. Comcast: No response. Century Link: No objections. City of Arvada: No response. This concludes the summary of comments. Please re -submit the ODP and plat as one PDF file. For questions or clarification on any comments, feel free to directly contact me or Dave Brossman. Sincerely, Scott Cutler Planner II cc: WZ-19-03 case file Mark Jolstad Case No. WZ19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP ♦SAI City Of ridge WheatR PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO: Scott Cutler, Planner FROM: Jordan Jefferies, PE DATE: July 12, 2019 SUBJECT: WZ-19-03 / Ward Road Pond ODP I have completed Public Works' review of the first submittal, received on July 2, 2019, of the Ward Road Pond ODP located at the southeast comer of the westbound I-70 frontage road and Ward road and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Outline Development Plan: CDPI —Cover Sheet 1. The word "plan" is misspelled in the Case History section. Please revise. ODP2 — Sketch Plan 1. Information Only -Please note that the fire district will likely require two points of ingress/egress to planning area 1 (and possibly to planning area 2) to meet their requirements. CIVIL ENGINEERING Preliminary Drainage Report: No Action required. 1. Information Only - Note that assumptions in regard to runoff coefficient and other parameters will be verified in the Final Drainage Report when more information is provided. 2. Information Only - Note that the City requires the use of the UD -Detention spreadsheet rather than the FAA spreadsheet for detention calculations. Please utilize UD - Detention for calculations in the Final Drainage Report. **NOTE**: Please be sure all survey work and platting is performed on the City Datum. It is critical to ensure that the surveyor is aware of the datum requirements prior to initiating survey data collection. A Datum Conversion information sheet is provided with these comments to instruct the surveyor on how to ensure the data is collected in accordance with City requirements. Ward Road Pond ODP _Rwi—1 letter down Public Works Engineering July 12, 2019 Page 2 FUTURE REQUIREMENTS (Specific Development Phase): 1. CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater than one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, ROW Construction, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. 2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement: Prior to the issuance of any Building, Sitework, or Right -of -Way Construction Permits or the commencement of any construction activities, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) shall be executed by the project owner/developer. The project owner/developer will need to contact the Dept. of Community Development at 303.235.2846 to obtain a copy of the SIA template. Please note that an approved engineer's itemized cost estimate for the public improvements will be included in the SIA (refer to Other Requirement #3 below). SIAs are recorded at the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office with the Final Plat. 3. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee: Upon acceptance of the Itemized Engineer's Cost Estimate, an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (ILOC) in the amount of reflecting the total amount of the approved cost estimate plus 25% (125% of the total estimate) shall be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval at the time of SIA submittal. The total amount required for the Irrevocable Letter of Credit will be determined upon approval of the cost estimate. The ILOC shall remain in force for the entire duration of the project, and the City reserves the right to request the ILOC be renewed if deemed necessary. A photocopy of both the itemized cost estimate and ILOC will be attached to the SIA and recorded at the county. 4. Private improvements Cost Estimate & Use Tax: A cost estimate for private infrastructure improvements will be required prior to issuance of a Sitework Permit. The private improvements cost estimate shall include a breakdown of costs for all non-public "horizontal" infrastructure installed on site, including but not limited to: paving, curb & gutter, sidewalks, sanitary sewer, water mains, hydrants, lighting, private storm sewer improvements, and landscaping. Costs associated with "vertical" construction and public infrastructure should not be included. The private improvements cost estimate will be used to determine the City use tax due for this project. City use taxis due upon application for a Sitework Permit. Ward Road Pond ODP Review -1 letter.doc Public Works Engineering July 12, 2019 Page 3 2 -Year Warranty Period and Guarantee for Public Improvements Upon completion of all public improvements and Final Acceptance has been granted by the City Inspector, the original Irrevocable Letter of Credit shall be surrendered. At that time a 2 -year warranty period for the completed and approved public improvements shall commence. If at any time during said 2 -year Warranty Period the City Inspector deems that the constructed public improvements are in such condition as to require repairs or replacement, the Developer shall complete such work upon request. Upon commencement of the 2 -year Warranty Period, a 2nd Letter of Credit in the amount of 25% of the original itemized engineer's cost estimate shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge and be dated as to expire on the 2 -year anniversary of the Warranty Period commencement date. The City shall retain said Letter of Credit for the entire 2 -year Warranty Period. Upon completion of the 2 -year Warranty Period, the 2nd Letter of Credit shall be surrendered by the City of Wheat Ridge. 6. Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing: a. ROW Permits. Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way (ROW), the necessary Right -of -Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right -of -Way Construction Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan (if applicable), Construction Control Plan and easement or ROW dedications b. Licensing. All work within the public Right -of -Way shall only be performed by a municipally -licensed contractor. 7. Sitework Permit: Prior to construction of any private infrastructure on the site, a Sitework Permit will need to be obtained from the City Building Department. Payment of the City use tax is required at the time of application for the Sitework Permit. Sitework Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study (if applicable), Construction Plans, and Construction Control Plan. 8. Construction Control Plan: A Construction Control Plan (CCP) shall be required prior to issuance of Sitework and ROW Permits. The Construction Control Plan is a modified set of construction plans used in the field to facilitate recordation of key as -built elevations and dimensions. The CCP shall be developed by the design engineer and architect and shall be submitted to the City for review and final approval. Instructions for development of the CCP are included with this letter. 9. Pre -Construction Meeting: Ward Road Pond ODP Review -1 letter.doc Public Works Engineering July 12, 2019 Page 4 Prior to commencement of any construction activities the contractor shall schedule a pre -construction meeting with the city of Wheat Ridge public works at 303.23 5.286 1. The contractor shall be responsible for contacting all applicable utility districts for this meeting. 10. Drainage Certification/ As -Built Plans/ SMA and O & M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancv for the subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer -of -Record shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter (DCL) stating that the overall site grading was completed per the approved Grading and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed per the approved construction plans and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The DCL shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As -Built Plans on the Current City Datum for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. b. As -Built Plans: The following items shall be included in the As -Built Plan prior to City acceptance: i. Storm Sewer (this info referenced in DCL) 1. Detention/WQ pond volume (sufficient spot elevations for engineer to calculate the volume). 2. Detention/WQ pond Outlet Structure elevations. 3. Manholes, rim and invert elevations. 4. Drop Inlets, grate and invert elevations Liehtine (within Public ROW only) 1. Streetlight locations. 2. Pedestrian light locations 3. Pull Box locations. 4. Electric meter location(s) Three (3) copies of the "As -Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: i. One (1) hardcopy is to be signed & sealed on 24" X 36" bond paper, and ii. Two (2) electronic files are to be delivered on DVD/CD-ROM as follows: 1. One (1) file in AutoCAD 2015 DWG or older format, AND 2. One (1) file in PDF format (of the signed & sealed sheets). 11. Information pertaining to the Public Works development requirements, Site Drainage Requirements, the City's Street Construction Standards & Details in AutoCAD@ DWG format, ROW maps, and City -based coordinate and land surveying information (i.e., Current City Datum), is all available on the Public Works, Development Review page of the City of Wheat Ridge website at: www.ci.wheatridee.co.us Ward Road Pond ODP Review -1 letter.doc ♦ AI City Of 9rWheatPqdge PUBLIC WORKS May 19, 2017 Citv of Wheat Ridae Datum Conversion Information & Procedure BACKGROUND Most land surveyors using modem GPS (Global Positioning System) field equipment set up their data collectors to use North American Datum 1983(2011) (NAD83(2011)). It has been reported that field surveyors are having difficulty converting between NAD83(2011) and City of Wheat Ridge datum. The national datum is being updated to a new system scheduled to be completed in 2022. The City of Wheat Ridge may have to revise its datum upon completion of the new system in 2022, but if necessary, such a revision will not be made until the revised national system is in common use. For this reason, we have created this narrative describing the process currently required to set up a data collector for use within the City of Wheat Ridge, and instructions on how to convert other datum coordinates to the City of Wheat Ridge datum, referred to hereafter as the "Current City Datum". The Current City Datum is related to Colorado State Plane Central Zone 0502 NAD83 using the following elements: An Average Latitude of 39046'35.634" and an Average Longitude of 105006'17.736" has been established at the Center of Project. Computation Notes: Center of Project has been determined to be at the approximate location of the Center West 16th comer of Section 22, T3S, R69W, at the intersection of Hoyt Court and 43rd Avenue extended. The Combined Factor of 0.999747803 was determined by multiplying the Scale Factor by the Elevation Factor. The Current City Datum coordinates were determined by multiplying the Colorado State Plane Central Zone 0502 NAD83 Coordinates by the inverse (1.00025226062) of the Combined Factor and then truncating 1,000,000 from the Northing Coordinate and 3,000,000 from the Fasting Coordinate. U.S Army Corp of Engineer Geodetic conversion program Corpscon V6.0 was used for the Average Latitude and Average Longitude to calculate a Scale Factor of 1.000005363 at the Center of Project. Project Average Elevation has been determined to be 5440.00 U.S. survey feet by averaging the elevations of all observed monuments. The Elevation Factor of 0.99974244138 was determined by dividing the Accepted Earth Radius (20,906,000 feet) by the sum of the Accepted Earth Radius and the Average Elevation. City of Wheat Ridge Datum Conversion Infinmation down Public Works Engineering May 19, 2017 Page 2 DATA COLLECTOR SETUP Coordinate System: US State Plane 1983; Colorado Central Zone 0502; NAD83; GEOID12* Coordinates: Ground (keyed in scale factor) Ground Scale Factor: 1.00025226062 False Northing Offset: -1,000,000 survey feet False Fasting Offset: -3,000,000 survey feet Project Location: Lat=39°46'35.634"N; Lon— 105°06'17.736"W; Height=5440.00sft This setup should give satisfactory results Citywide. PROCEDURE Upon setup of the data collector using the above parameters, tie into at least two Wheat Ridge control points. Control point coordinates can be found at: htty://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/DocumentView.asp?DID-68 A map of the control points can be found at: httn://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/DocumentView.asp?DID-69 Survey monument sheets and some restrictions and requirements are set out at: httn://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/85/Survev-Monument-Sheets The overall Monumentation / Benchmark site can be found at: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/81/Monumentation-Benchmarks The surveyor should then determine if results are satisfactory for the job City of Wheat Ridge Datum Conversion Infamoation.doex THINK TANK s t U d l o architecture urban design interiors 24 -June -19 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Lauren Mikulak— Planning Manager Reference: 1MS Lake Holdings, LLC— Request for Rezone Application w/ ODP Dear Ms. Mikulak: e letter of request will be included staff reports to Planning immission and City Council and ould be updated for that purpose. Please see the attached Land Use Case Processing Application and supporting ODP materials for your review and consideration of the 1MS Lake Holdin s LLC re uest for re -zoning of the subject parcel located at the NE corner of Ward Road and Interstate Most recently this ens). was a fishing pond Scope: The owner (applicant) proposes to a -zone the 22.73 acre subject parcel from its current Agricultural Two (Ag -Two) designation to the Mixed Use Comme 'al Transit Oriented Development (MU -C TOD) to provide the flexibility for the future redevelopment of this former gravel mine site. The proposed project scope will entail a mix of commercial, retail and residential uses surrounding a private lake and linear park. We are proposing two planning areas for consideration: A mo -family residential community is proposed for the upper Planning Area 1 and will consist o id -rise, medium densit partments with complementary retail amenities atop structured parking integrated and concealed within the existing site to The purpose of this application Is to change the street and local pedestrian corridors and will also further take adv the zoning which will allow for a wider range and pedestrian access to the linear park and the lakefr The lowe house a retail marine dealership &service facility, a wakeboard c of uses. Ultimately, your goal is to develop ater-front character a these two specific uses. Reframe this mischaracterization - zoned ag, used for paragraph to that effect. fishing and as open space. Review Criteria: We believe this request for re -zone meets the intent d requirements of §26-303.D of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code for the following reasons: 1. We believethe rehabilitation of th' ormerindustrial site othe benefitof life, safety and welfareof thesubject property and community at -large. The proposed development will allow the applicant the ability to incorporate community enhancing businesses and amenities which will ameliorate the previous derelict use of the property. Further, the integration of this property with the surrounding TOD development is an inherent benefit not only to the applicant, but also to the future residents, business operators and the surrounding community as a whole. P.O. Box 781, Frederick, Colorado 80530-0781 © 303.997.4948 the request is to rezone to PMUD not MU -C TOD 2. The proposed concept for Planning Area 1 and Planning ould only be accomplished with the inherent flexibility afforded by a mixed-use zone district Tarh-a7folt�. 3. Present locations of municipal infrastructure including site accesses, fire -protection and site utilities will be suitable for the applicant to connect. The applicant will provide for the Be more specific. Review comp required to facilitate connection to municipal services. plan, subarea plan, and vision 4. Review Criteria Conditions: plan. Tell the story. a. We believe the proposed request for re -zone is in complete alignment with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan as well as with the overall nature and character of the RTD - Transit Oriented This statement is Development currently in progress one block to the north of this site. too generic otApplicable c. e believe that the adjacent RTD — Transit Oriented Development is so broad in its positive effects on this area of Wheat Ridge, that it is indeed in the interest of the community to encourage redevelopment of this site at this time. d. Not Applicable ODP Checklist Criteria: RTD owns the Wheat Ridge - Ward Station Private entities such as yourselves are bringing transit oriented development We believe the proposed request for change of zone district is fundamentally necessary for the applicant to rehabilitate this property in virtually any manner due to the limitations of the current Ag -Two zoning district. Since the conclusion of gravel mining operations on this site, it has been largely left derelict and is a blight on one of the main gateways into Wheat Ridge. The proposed rehabilitation will focus on the positive aspects o this site such as the lake and the topography and use them to best advantage to create a vibrant community that would co plement and enhance the current development occurring in the immediate vicinity of this site. We believe the scale andnsity of proposed development would also be commensurate to that which is being developed in the immediate vicinity. .1;nmp (rnanv?) In \A/R will not is as blighted but as ag/open space/ c is currently being studied in conjunction with CDOT and the City of service City and tthe needs of the development and restrictions on the adjacent arteriaN. voc oc ccc t utt carelearmz... owns none of the'ng Area 1 will be from the 1-70 Frontage Road — North, approximately mid -block, a minimum of 350 feet East utilities --only storm o The proposed access to Planning Area 2 will be the historic access pointjust past the apex of the curve on sewer tag Road — North. There is presently a curb -cut at this location and there is an access and drainage easement op atthislocation tofacilitate access tothe peninsula site potential for access off Ward Municipal utilities e all presently contained within the 1-70 Frontage Road — North, and the connections will be proposed at or near t e site access points identified for Planning Area 1 & Planning Area 2. Preliminary inquiry with Arvada Fire Protection has indicated feasibility for the proposed uses and access points, but the engineering of fire protection water service needs to each site has yet to be determined. To conclude, we again believe this application for re -zoning of the subject parcel is in keeping of the intent and statutory guidelines outlined in the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code and further believe this proposal to be complementary and synergistic with the development activities underway in the immediate vicinity. We look forward to receiving your input and feedback on this proposal. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or should you require further information. Regards: Patrick Berrend —Architect, NCARB Enclosures: ODP Application Materials 07/03/19 WED 12:09 FAX 303 424 0828 VALLEY WATER DIS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT '121O'► WEST52ND AV EN U F. WI-IEAT RIDGE, ('0LORZA1)0 80033 'fFa.N M IONL 303-424-9661 July 1, Z019 FAx 103-424-0828 Scutt (::a.ltl�a' City of, Wheat Rid, C. 7500 W, 29"i Avenue Wheat'. Ridge:,, CU 8003 3) Deal -S, colt! In reference to Case No. NVQ -I()-03, Wau.Cl Road 11UnCl OF)13, Ilru Vtllley Wtltcr District hats reviewed the inquiry and the folkmvillg, itemsapply• I . Valley Water District can proviCIC wtater seivice t0 the P1.0p0sed project sul.1ject to Valley Water' District males 'Mld rc ulaltiun:; and Denver WVlter l.)epautnlerlt LTC1atin rules. ? Additional WOM' maairl lines, 'tire hydrants <ar lire spi,ill1:1er linus may b. n�:vda.d to ttteel Valley Water I;)islrict, Denver WaILCl' Depaulment and Arvada Fir o Prot cello 1) District N(luirements which would he at. iaa•v.11er's expense. 3. Ifaddition-al wall -r Illaill lines, fire hydrants or lira sprinkler lines are needed, t.hr, owner woaald need to pruvide any necessary Casrnlenls. jVI CgnSti-acti01l must be. in Compliance. With '[he lea'uls of llu; easement. 4. I'he owner Will be re�pousil,)le lurthe Inst ofi,10naCstic. tt�115, irii�latiun laps and Owe line taps iileluclin�; service ].fines and naete.r installation. j\II lap instaill,ui0l)", WIII he. subject to the-, male~ an(i re`,t.tlaatiOnS Of tile. Valley Walter L)istri(a'. and the Denv(�r GVnlui Department. i. The uwnc:r c�tthc property twill need to c(rnta.ct. Vt1ilev WaLel- Dintricl. at ;;I;►;-X12<I- 9661 prior t0 devulupnlcnt of tale pro.ICcl to dISC,aISS spccilic water system clrsio.aa needs. If YOU halve ally llll'tI1L'1' l'IUNSt1u11S„ please. l`ec.l tree. to CUrltucl Ile tat .,01-,:124-')061 ,�irlc, sly, r^ K-, 11(:Cn M..I(aadnuek I)islrict 01'tice Manager m Xcel EnergySV PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY July 5, 2019 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Scott Cutler Re: Ward Road Pond ODP Rezone, Case # WZ-19-03 Right of Way & Permits 1123 West 3" Avenue Denver, Colorado 80223 Telephone: 303.571.3306 Facsimile: 3 03. 571.32 84 donna.l.george@xcelenergy.com Public Service Company of Colorado's (PSCo) Right of Way & Permits Referral Desk has reviewed the request for the Ward Road Pond ODP Rezone. Please be advised that Public Service Company has existing natural gas and electric distribution facilities within the areas indicated in this proposed rezone. Public Service Company has no objection to this proposed rezone, contingent upon Public Service Company of Colorado's ability to maintain all existing rights and this amendment should not hinder our ability for future expansion, including all present and any future accommodations for natural gas transmission and electric transmission related facilities. As the project progresses, the property owner/developer/contractor must complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities via xcelenergV.com/InstallAndConnect. The Builder's Call Line is 1- 800-628-2121. It is then the responsibility of the developer to contact the Designer assigned to the project for approval of design details. Additional easements may need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities. Donna George Right of Way and Permits Public Service Company of Colorado / Xcel Energy Office: 303-571-3306 — Email: donna.l.george@xcelenergy.com From: 8DRC0 To: Scott Cutler Subject: RE: WZ-19-03 Referral - Wheat Ridge Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 11:40:08 AM Attachments: imaaeWlma Good morning, Thank you for the opportunity to look through your conceptual plans for Ward rd. pond. These plans aren't far enough along to give much productive feedback. However, Xcel Energy has a new department that helps builders and developers do long term planning. We can help you plan items out in the conceptual phase. Some things that we do that you may find helpful, but aren't limited to are: • Capacity checks and engineering reviews. Does your area have the capacity for your project or are there reinforcements that will be needed? • Identify possible conflicts with gas and electric in your area. • Find possible locations fortransformers and meters. • Help getyou in touch with rebates and offers. • Help with planning and scheduling your project. • Do you have standards and process questions? We can help guide you there as well. You can always reach out to us with any questions @ BDRCO@xcelenergy.com. We also have a great website that was created for groups just like you. It is there to help plan your project and will answer most questions that may arise. Check out our xcelenergy.com/InstallAndConnect site and see how Xcel Energy can help keep your project on track! Tony Pietras Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature Builder Developer Representative 1123 WEST 3RD AVENUE Denver CO. 80223 P: 303-571-3844 C: 303-981-6184 E: BDRCO@XCELENERGY.com E: Tony.Pietrasaxcelenergy.com xcelenergy.com/InstallAndConnect Visit our website for more information about installing and connecting service with Xcel From: Scott Cutler[maiho:scutler@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 10:18 AM To: BDRCO Subject: WZ-19-03 Referral - Wheat Ridge CAUTION EXTERNAL SENDER: Stop and consider before you click links or open attachments. Report suspicious email using the 'Report Phishing/Spam' button in Outlook. Builder Developer Representative Group, The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a zone change with an Outline Development Plan at the southeast comer of W. I-70 Frontage Road N and Ward Road (Case No. WZ- 19-03). Please download the application documents using the following Dropbox link. Link: hUs //www dronbox_com/sh/3je7ir9m7avdgjb/AABxdvJeNZ.VNc7.X_Obg2dYUta9d1=0 Comments are due by July 19,2019; no response from you will constitute having no objections or concems. Feel free to be in touch with any additional questions. Thank you, Scott Please note you will needAdohe software to view the application suhmittals. The latest version ofAdohe Reader can he downloadedhere: http://getadohe.eomlreaderl Scott Cutler Planner II 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone 303-235-2849 Fax 303-234-2849 wvwxi.wheatridgexo.us 0 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. U JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ARVADA FIRE AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO COMMENTSITIS t8,,.,z NICHOLAS GANDENG EMEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT OF HIGHVIAY$ STATE OF COLOPAOO. IN A DEED RECORDED PERRI K 19891N GOOK 1M AT PAGE 984 VEHICLE A PORTON OF THE NORTHEAST VO OF SECTION M TOWNSHIP 9 BOIRH, RANGEJEFFERSON. ST TEST OF THE 6tM1 PM ACCESS,, / COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE T COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 ACRES MORE OR LESS 19SUARVI8 SF 4-1 I -E INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH PLANNING KGS ICLE BUILDING PAD AREA 1 e C ACCESS FINAL BUILDING AREA T.B.D. 4.86 ACREo S .o• SEE NOTE 2 •"�� NG PAD •"•�••� ...................... NAL BUILDING AREA T.B.D. OPRY ................... SEE NOTE 2 .... pEP gOv PARKING ------ BU __ _ PK PLANNING AREA 2 BUILDING PAD 17.87 ACRES SEE NOTE 2 WARD POND Sift#JOUNOARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 10% MNIMUM LANDSOAPE OOVERACE 10% MIXED 0.5E DEVELOR'IENT COVERY£ AND OPEN SPACE MNIMUM LOT SIZE NO MIN LOT SIZE MNIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS NO MIN LOT SIZE NET DENSITY MIN 9 DU / ACRE GRO55 DENSITY N / A MINIMUM PERIMETER EE75ACK 10' MINIMUM 5EPARATION BETWEEN SLOGS 30' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 20MIN. 115' MAX (5 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 MAXIMJM BUILDINGS COVERAGE 25% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE COVERPGE 15%51NSLE USE DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM LOT SIZE NO MIN LOT 512E MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS NO MIN LOT SIZE NET DEN517Y N / A GRi DEN5I71 N / A MINIMUM PERIMETER 5E75ACK 10' MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN BLDGB 30' MAXIMJM BUILDINGS HEIGHT 20' MIN. 90' MAX. (6 STORIES) 0 60' 1Y0' SKETCH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: V = 60'-O" NOTE 1 W L_ co LAND SUMMARY PLAWJIFA'a AREA 486 ACRE5 PLAWJIFA'a AREA :1 1191 ACRES TOTAL 517E I n,13 ADRE5 LEGEND: P FGHWITTED USE THINKTANK NP NOT F1 W ITTED USE ■■ s t u d 511 SFECIAL USE C CONDITIONAL :Y CONTACT: STEVEN PARKER - FIRE MARSHAL :/EMAIL: 303403-0411/STEVEN PARKEP@ARVADAFIRE. COM 7-18-19 is referral was reviewed for compliance with the 2012 International Fire Code (IFC adopted by the City of Vvheat Ridge. The Fire Distinct has the following comments larding this plan. Wratten indication of compliance and/or modifications to the plans ) required to be provided on the next submittal. e plans provided do not contain sufficient detail to provide site specific comments. No engineered drawings are provided, comments specific to this site can be Unless otherwise specified, all comments apply to both the construction �cuments and the development plans. Utility plans shall be shown to determine appropriate locations and quantity of fire Depending on the number of residential units, two separate emergency vehicle cess points will be required. Fire apparatus access shall be 26 feet wide. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads exceeding 150 feet shall have an approved maround provided. Sprinklers will be required to be installed in multi -family residential structures. The mmeraal boat sales/repair may require sprinklers, and the proposed restaurant ay need sprinklers as well. Fire hydrants shall be installed within 150feet of FDCs. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided with an approved all-weather rface (concrete or asphalt), and shall be capable of supporting an imposed load of x,000 pounds. A turning analysis shall be completed and provided for review using the eafio Eons for AFPD Tower 56. Approved fire apparatus access road shall be provided during construction less otherwise approved, the fire apparatus access road shall consist ofthe first of asphalt or concrete shall be provided prior to vertical construction. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made operational to provide the minimum Hired fire flow pnorto commencing vertical construction. The private roads through the site shall be dedicated on the final plat as "Fire paratus Access Road" or other similar language as required by the City of Vvheat During construction and upon completion there shall be building signage sided, a minimum of 4 inches high with a 0 5 inch stroke and visible from the of or road forting that building. Building construction plans can be submitted to AFPD pnorto the completion of development review process. Note, that if building construction plans are milted concurrently, AFPD will not release approved plans ora permit until the elopment review process is complete, fire apparatus access road is provided as roved and fire hydrants are installed and operational as required. Complete specifications and building construction plans shall be submitted DIV to the Fire Distinct (AFPD) for review and approval at the same time plans submitted to the Vvheat Ridge building department and pnorto construction Lying. The developer is encouraged to contact the AFPD Fire Marshal's Office to fy plan submittal requirements and Fire District permit fees pnorto plans EHEET NOT75: U EASTEWI ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT FRGPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACRO55 THE TRACT 'A' ADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS Iii ff^.AWTLTJ W EASEMENT RIGHTS AND FINAL DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION 19 PETIDING 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, 5IDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO B£ DETERMINED AT SOP SUBMITTAL. amhae 'e 'ma' ceslgn me"i petrlck beneM - srWticc( rrsrb psVlckmlMlktankaW tllaret (anan3) 903-99Ti91G (rtgple)303-980-9925 PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 Jos NUMBER Ll W Z U � _j W m Z F- n < W l —1 Z W O 0 � H V n lll W W 4Y V U WF_ Q Z ®Q 0 _j p W K W W (Y H PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 Jos NUMBER From: 8DRC0 To: Scott Cutler Subject: RE: WZ-19-03 Referral - Wheat Ridge Date: Wednesday, July 3, 2019 11:40:08 AM Attachments: imaaeWlma Good morning, Thank you for the opportunity to look through your conceptual plans for Ward rd. pond. These plans aren't far enough along to give much productive feedback. However, Xcel Energy has a new department that helps builders and developers do long term planning. We can help you plan items out in the conceptual phase. Some things that we do that you may find helpful, but aren't limited to are: • Capacity checks and engineering reviews. Does your area have the capacity for your project or are there reinforcements that will be needed? • Identify possible conflicts with gas and electric in your area. • Find possible locations fortransformers and meters. • Help getyou in touch with rebates and offers. • Help with planning and scheduling your project. • Do you have standards and process questions? We can help guide you there as well. You can always reach out to us with any questions @ BDRCO@xcelenergy.com. We also have a great website that was created for groups just like you. It is there to help plan your project and will answer most questions that may arise. Check out our xcelenergy.com/InstallAndConnect site and see how Xcel Energy can help keep your project on track! Tony Pietras Xcel Energy I Responsible By Nature Builder Developer Representative 1123 WEST 3RD AVENUE Denver CO. 80223 P: 303-571-3844 C: 303-981-6184 E: BDRCO@XCELENERGY.com E: Tony.Pietrasaxcelenergy.com xcelenergy.com/InstallAndConnect Visit our website for more information about installing and connecting service with Xcel From: Scott Cutler[maiho:scutler@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2019 10:18 AM To: BDRCO Subject: WZ-19-03 Referral - Wheat Ridge CAUTION EXTERNAL SENDER: Stop and consider before you click links or open attachments. Report suspicious email using the 'Report Phishing/Spam' button in Outlook. Builder Developer Representative Group, The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a zone change with an Outline Development Plan at the southeast comer of W. I-70 Frontage Road N and Ward Road (Case No. WZ- 19-03). Please download the application documents using the following Dropbox link. Link: hUs //www dronbox_com/sh/3je7ir9m7avdgjb/AABxdvJeNZ.VNc7.X_Obg2dYUta9d1=0 Comments are due by July 19,2019; no response from you will constitute having no objections or concems. Feel free to be in touch with any additional questions. Thank you, Scott Please note you will needAdohe software to view the application suhmittals. The latest version ofAdohe Reader can he downloadedhere: http://getadohe.eomlreaderl Scott Cutler Planner II 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone 303-235-2849 Fax 303-234-2849 wvwxi.wheatridgexo.us 0 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business -confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attaching the original message, and delete the original message from your computer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. Xcel EnergySV PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY July 5, 2019 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Scott Cutler Re: Ward Road Pond ODP Rezone, Case # WZ-19-03 Right of Way & Permits 1123 West 3" Avenue Denver, Colorado 80223 Telephone: 303.571.3306 Facsimile: 3 03. 571.32 84 donna.l.george@xcelenergy.com Public Service Company of Colorado's (PSCo) Right of Way & Permits Referral Desk has reviewed the request for the Ward Road Pond ODP Rezone. Please be advised that Public Service Company has existing natural gas and electric distribution facilities within the areas indicated in this proposed rezone. Public Service Company has no objection to this proposed rezone, contingent upon Public Service Company of Colorado's ability to maintain all existing rights and this amendment should not hinder our ability for future expansion, including all present and any future accommodations for natural gas transmission and electric transmission related facilities. As the project progresses, the property owner/developer/contractor must complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities via xcelenergV.com/InstallAndConnect. The Builder's Call Line is 1- 800-628-2121. It is then the responsibility of the developer to contact the Designer assigned to the project for approval of design details. Additional easements may need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities. Donna George Right of Way and Permits Public Service Company of Colorado / Xcel Energy Office: 303-571-3306 — Email: donna.l.george@xcelenergy.com 07/03/19 WED 12:09 FAX 303 424 0828 VALLEY WATER DIS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT '121O'► WEST52ND AV EN U F. WI-IEAT RIDGE, ('0LORZA1)0 80033 'fFa.N M IONL 303-424-9661 July 1, Z019 FAx 103-424-0828 Scutt (::a.ltl�a' City of, Wheat Rid, C. 7500 W, 29"i Avenue Wheat'. Ridge:,, CU 8003 3) Deal -S, colt! In reference to Case No. NVQ -I()-03, Wau.Cl Road 11UnCl OF)13, Ilru Vtllley Wtltcr District hats reviewed the inquiry and the folkmvillg, itemsapply• I . Valley Water District can proviCIC wtater seivice t0 the P1.0p0sed project sul.1ject to Valley Water' District males 'Mld rc ulaltiun:; and Denver WVlter l.)epautnlerlt LTC1atin rules. ? Additional WOM' maairl lines, 'tire hydrants <ar lire spi,ill1:1er linus may b. n�:vda.d to ttteel Valley Water I;)islrict, Denver WaILCl' Depaulment and Arvada Fir o Prot cello 1) District N(luirements which would he at. iaa•v.11er's expense. 3. Ifaddition-al wall -r Illaill lines, fire hydrants or lira sprinkler lines are needed, t.hr, owner woaald need to pruvide any necessary Casrnlenls. jVI CgnSti-acti01l must be. in Compliance. With '[he lea'uls of llu; easement. 4. I'he owner Will be re�pousil,)le lurthe Inst ofi,10naCstic. tt�115, irii�latiun laps and Owe line taps iileluclin�; service ].fines and naete.r installation. j\II lap instaill,ui0l)", WIII he. subject to the-, male~ an(i re`,t.tlaatiOnS Of tile. Valley Walter L)istri(a'. and the Denv(�r GVnlui Department. i. The uwnc:r c�tthc property twill need to c(rnta.ct. Vt1ilev WaLel- Dintricl. at ;;I;►;-X12<I- 9661 prior t0 devulupnlcnt of tale pro.ICcl to dISC,aISS spccilic water system clrsio.aa needs. If YOU halve ally llll'tI1L'1' l'IUNSt1u11S„ please. l`ec.l tree. to CUrltucl Ile tat .,01-,:124-')061 ,�irlc, sly, r^ K-, 11(:Cn M..I(aadnuek I)islrict 01'tice Manager m U JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ARVADA FIRE AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO COMMENTSITIS t8,,.,z NICHOLAS GANDENG EMEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT OF HIGHVIAY$ STATE OF COLOPAOO. IN A DEED RECORDED PERRI K 19891N GOOK 1M AT PAGE 984 VEHICLE A PORTON OF THE NORTHEAST VO OF SECTION M TOWNSHIP 9 BOIRH, RANGEJEFFERSON. ST TEST OF THE 6tM1 PM ACCESS,, / COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE T COLORADO CONTAINING 2273 ACRES MORE OR LESS 19SUARVI8 SF 4-1 I -E INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH PLANNING KGS ICLE BUILDING PAD AREA 1 e C ACCESS FINAL BUILDING AREA T.B.D. 4.86 ACREo S .o• SEE NOTE 2 •"�� NG PAD •"•�••� ...................... NAL BUILDING AREA T.B.D. OPRY ................... SEE NOTE 2 .... pEP gOv PARKING ------ BU __ _ PK PLANNING AREA 2 BUILDING PAD 17.87 ACRES SEE NOTE 2 WARD POND Sift#JOUNOARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 10% MNIMUM LANDSOAPE OOVERACE 10% MIXED 0.5E DEVELOR'IENT COVERY£ AND OPEN SPACE MNIMUM LOT SIZE NO MIN LOT SIZE MNIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS NO MIN LOT SIZE NET DENSITY MIN 9 DU / ACRE GRO55 DENSITY N / A MINIMUM PERIMETER EE75ACK 10' MINIMUM 5EPARATION BETWEEN SLOGS 30' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 20MIN. 115' MAX (5 STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 MAXIMJM BUILDINGS COVERAGE 25% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE COVERPGE 15%51NSLE USE DEVELOPMENT MINIMUM LOT SIZE NO MIN LOT 512E MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS NO MIN LOT SIZE NET DEN517Y N / A GRi DEN5I71 N / A MINIMUM PERIMETER 5E75ACK 10' MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN BLDGB 30' MAXIMJM BUILDINGS HEIGHT 20' MIN. 90' MAX. (6 STORIES) 0 60' 1Y0' SKETCH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: V = 60'-O" NOTE 1 W L_ co LAND SUMMARY PLAWJIFA'a AREA 486 ACRE5 PLAWJIFA'a AREA :1 1191 ACRES TOTAL 517E I n,13 ADRE5 LEGEND: P FGHWITTED USE THINKTANK NP NOT F1 W ITTED USE ■■ s t u d 511 SFECIAL USE C CONDITIONAL :Y CONTACT: STEVEN PARKER - FIRE MARSHAL :/EMAIL: 303403-0411/STEVEN PARKEP@ARVADAFIRE. COM 7-18-19 is referral was reviewed for compliance with the 2012 International Fire Code (IFC adopted by the City of Vvheat Ridge. The Fire Distinct has the following comments larding this plan. Wratten indication of compliance and/or modifications to the plans ) required to be provided on the next submittal. e plans provided do not contain sufficient detail to provide site specific comments. No engineered drawings are provided, comments specific to this site can be Unless otherwise specified, all comments apply to both the construction �cuments and the development plans. Utility plans shall be shown to determine appropriate locations and quantity of fire Depending on the number of residential units, two separate emergency vehicle cess points will be required. Fire apparatus access shall be 26 feet wide. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads exceeding 150 feet shall have an approved maround provided. Sprinklers will be required to be installed in multi -family residential structures. The mmeraal boat sales/repair may require sprinklers, and the proposed restaurant ay need sprinklers as well. Fire hydrants shall be installed within 150feet of FDCs. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided with an approved all-weather rface (concrete or asphalt), and shall be capable of supporting an imposed load of x,000 pounds. A turning analysis shall be completed and provided for review using the eafio Eons for AFPD Tower 56. Approved fire apparatus access road shall be provided during construction less otherwise approved, the fire apparatus access road shall consist ofthe first of asphalt or concrete shall be provided prior to vertical construction. Fire hydrants shall be installed and made operational to provide the minimum Hired fire flow pnorto commencing vertical construction. The private roads through the site shall be dedicated on the final plat as "Fire paratus Access Road" or other similar language as required by the City of Vvheat During construction and upon completion there shall be building signage sided, a minimum of 4 inches high with a 0 5 inch stroke and visible from the of or road forting that building. Building construction plans can be submitted to AFPD pnorto the completion of development review process. Note, that if building construction plans are milted concurrently, AFPD will not release approved plans ora permit until the elopment review process is complete, fire apparatus access road is provided as roved and fire hydrants are installed and operational as required. Complete specifications and building construction plans shall be submitted DIV to the Fire Distinct (AFPD) for review and approval at the same time plans submitted to the Vvheat Ridge building department and pnorto construction Lying. The developer is encouraged to contact the AFPD Fire Marshal's Office to fy plan submittal requirements and Fire District permit fees pnorto plans EHEET NOT75: U EASTEWI ACCESS TO THE SUBJECT FRGPERTY TRAVERSES ADJACENT PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACRO55 THE TRACT 'A' ADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS Iii ff^.AWTLTJ W EASEMENT RIGHTS AND FINAL DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION 19 PETIDING 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, 5IDEWALKS, LANDSCAPING, PARKING TO B£ DETERMINED AT SOP SUBMITTAL. amhae 'e 'ma' ceslgn me"i petrlck beneM - srWticc( rrsrb psVlckmlMlktankaW tllaret (anan3) 903-99Ti91G (rtgple)303-980-9925 PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 Jos NUMBER Ll W Z U � _j W m Z F- n < W l —1 Z W O 0 � H V n lll W W 4Y V U WF_ Q Z ®Q 0 _j p W K W W (Y H PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 Jos NUMBER STATE OF COLORADO Traffic &safery ®®OLORADO Region 1 Department of Transportation 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, Colorado 802M PmieP Name. Ward Road Pond ODP OT has no Ime with the go ne change from Agricultural Two (A 2) to Planned Mixed Use Oemlopm ent IPM001 2 No vehicular ams wall be allowed f mm Hwy 72 (Ward Roadi. IT em are arrows on OOP 2 showing location of vehicle access to the site from HO frontage Road N orth, which is COOT rig d of - way .Any n ew access, modification of an access or change In use requires a Rate Highway Access Perm it ITearrows on the plan multi say" Pro posed Vehide Access with a note that ams will be provided by Rate Highway Ams Perm it There was no taffa report or numbers provided with your referral for us to access if any auxiliary lanes or improvements o the frontage road would be required. 5 Any sed m norucaod utility, survey,or landscaping work within COOT rig d of way will require a Sped at Use Permit bythe Department These permit applications can be found at the following link 6 Any n this property Mm at will be lntercate 70 mud be on pmise In nature and only aAremnsegoods or serves that are available on that property and mud mm ply with any other applicable rules governing outdoor advertising In Colorado, 2 PAR Nor 3. once theprolert lspar brand m 1 7 and the vO frontg e Road, werequest to review the drainage report when available. Highway MIIe Marker. Print Date 112/5/2019 1072 OT has no Ime with the go ne change from Agricultural Two (A 2) to Planned Mixed Use Oemlopm ent IPM001 2 No vehicular ams wall be allowed f mm Hwy 72 (Ward Roadi. IT em are arrows on OOP 2 showing location of vehicle access to the site from HO frontage Road N orth, which is COOT rig d of - way .Any n ew access, modification of an access or change In use requires a Rate Highway Access Perm it ITearrows on the plan multi say" Pro posed Vehide Access with a note that ams will be provided by Rate Highway Ams Perm it There was no taffa report or numbers provided with your referral for us to access if any auxiliary lanes or improvements o the frontage road would be required. 5 Any sed m norucaod utility, survey,or landscaping work within COOT rig d of way will require a Sped at Use Permit bythe Department These permit applications can be found at the following link 6 Any n this property Mm at will be lntercate 70 mud be on pmise In nature and only aAremnsegoods or serves that are available on that property and mud mm ply with any other applicable rules governing outdoor advertising In Colorado, 2 PAR Nor 3. once theprolert lspar brand m 1 7 and the vO frontg e Road, werequest to review the drainage report when available. U EIMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TR4CT5 9, U T 612 NICHOIAS GARDENS EMEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT OF HIGHVIAY$ STATE OF COLORADO, IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRU B K 19891N BOOK 1M AT PAGE 964 VEHICLE A PORTAST ON OF THE NORTHEVO OF SECTION SIX TOWNSHIPCOUNT 9 BOIRH, RANGE ST VIEBT OF THE BN PM ACCESS, _/ LING 22OF JEFFERSON. STATEOFCOLORADO ` CONTNNING 22]3 ACRES MORE OR LE55199024638 SF 4-1 I -E - INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTH PLANNING ICLE BUILDING PAD AREA 1 e C ACCESS FINAL BUILDING AREA T.B.D. 4.86 ACRES •o• ��SV\� SEE NOTE 2 •"�� NG PAD •"•�•� go• \••\\O.O\•�••\\ NAL BUILDING AREA T.B,D. OPRV .... ................... SEE NOTE 2 REP gOv A ••mn P ANN�Nn on000nn•••.•• q �R PARKING ------ BU P PLANNING AREA 2 BUILDING PAD 17.87 ACRES SEE NOTE 2 WARD POND Sift#JOUNOARY PCD - PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AREA 1 MAXIMUM BUILDING COVER E 10% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE OOVERACE 10% MIXED 0.5E DEVELOR'IENT COVERAGE AND OPEN SPACE MINIMUM LOT SIZE NO MIN LOT SIZE MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS NO MIN LOT SIZE NET DENSITY MIN 9 DU / ACRE GR055 DENSITY N / A MINIMUM PERIMETER 5E7540K 10' MINIMUM SEPARATION BETWEEN BLDGB 30' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 20MIN. 118' MAX (B STORIES) PLANNING AREA 2 MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE 25% MINIMUM LANDSCAPE COVERAGE GO SINGLE USE DEVELOFMENT MINIMUM LOT SIZE NO MIN LOT 512E MINIMUM LOT DIMENSIONS NO MIN LOT 512E NET DEN517Y N / A GROW DEN5I71 N / A MINIMUM PERIMETER 5E75ACK 10' MINIMUM 5EPARA7I0N BETWEEN BLDGB 30' MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT 20' MIN. 90' MAX. (6 STORIES) 0 60' 120' SKETCH PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE: V = 60'-O' NOTE 1 W T— in ID LAND SUMMARY PLAWJIFA'a AREA 486 ACRES PLAWJIFA'a AREA :1 1191 ACRE5 TOTAL 517E I n,13 ADRE5 LEGEND: P FGWITTIED USE NP NOT PEWIITTED USE 511 SPECIAL USE C CONDITIONAL PERMITTED USES ALLOWED LESS PA -1 PA -2 5E$IDENTAL INCWDING: P P ASSISTED LIVING FAnutT P P DWELLING, SINGLE PETACHED NP NP DWELLING, SINGLE ATTACHED P P DWELLING, PUP -Ex P P DWELLING, MULT9-E P P DWELLING, LI VE/WORK P P FOSTER CARE HOME NP NP 5E$IDENTIAL GROUP HOME P P PJO-P, CIVIC AND IN5TITUTOJAL INCLUDING COMMUNITY 5WLDIWSINCLUDNG LISR,FRIES,MUSEUMS P P HOSPITAL NP NP PAR'S, OPEN SPACE AND RAZAS P P PLACE OF WORSHIP P P PJBLIC USES AND 2JILDINGS P P FEECREATON FACILITES, INDOOR P P SCHOOLS,COLLEGES, TRADE SCHOOLS, UNIVER5ITIE5 P P UFGAN GARDEN5 P P UTILITIES, MAJOR NP NP UTILITIES, MINOR P P TRANSIT STATIONS, WBLIC OR PRIVATE NP NP COMMERCIAL SERNCES AND RETAIL ADULT ENTIPWAINMENT NP NP ANIMAL PAT CAPE P P GAIL PONDS c c GANK5 AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - NO DRIVE THRI P P GANK5 AND FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS - WITH PRI FIE THRI NP NP GARS, TAVERJS, AND NIGHT CLU55 P P GED AND BREAKFAST P P CAR WASHES NP NP DAT CAW CENTER CHILD AND ADULT P P DRIVE -JP OR DRIVE-THROUGH USES NP NP EATING ESTABLISHMENT P P FAST FOOD EATING ESTABLI54MENT P P MICRJBREWERY, MOPODISTILLERT WITH TAP ROOM P P MICRJBREWERY, MOPODISTILLERT WITHOUT TAP RWM P P MOTOR FUELING STATIONS NP NP MOTOR VEHICLE SALES OUTDOOR DISPLAY P P MOTOR VEHICLE SALES INDOOR DISPLAT P P GOAT VEHICLE AND T ILER SALES, REMALS, a 5EWOE P P OUTDOOR STORAGE NP NP PAWN GROKERS NP NP FERSOHAL BEW PES P P PHOTOCOPTNO AND FRINTNG P P FRODUCE STANDS P P RFCREATON FACILITIES, COMMERCIAL P P RFPAIR, RENTAL ANO 5ERVICING W BOATS - OUTDOOR STOR H P P RETAIL SALES UP TO 2DOOO TSF FOR ONE TENANT SPACE P P RETAIL SALES UP TO 60000 GSL FOR ONE TENANT SPACE NP NP RETAIL SALES OVER 60000 GSE FOR ONE TENANT SPACE NP NP URBAN GARDEN5 P P VETERNART CLINICS AND 1405PRALs - NO OUTDOOR PNS P P HOSPITALITY AND ENTERTAINMENT ARI STUDIOS AND GALLERIES P P HOTELS, MOTELS, AND EXTENDED STAT LWGING P P STUDIOS, INCLUDING ART, MUSK, PANICS, TELEVISION MIO RADIO P P THEATERS P P OFFICE AND INDUSTRIAL MEDICAL AND DENTAL OFFICES P P OFFICES P P OFFICE - WARENbuSE, NO OUTDOOR STORAGE NP NP OUTDOOR STORAGE NP NP RFSTROTED LIGHT NDUSTRIAL NP NP WHOLESALE NP NP MICILLART USES PARKING FACILITIES P P TEMPORARY USES SPECIAL EVENTS, INCLUDING FESTIVALS ANO FAWNERS MARKET P P SHEET NOTE5: U EASTERN AGGE55 TO THE 515JECT FRGPERTY L¢AVERSES ADJACENT PROPERTY. THIS DRIVEWAY ACRO55 THE TRACT 'A' ADHERES TO ESTABLISHED ACCESS ROME ff^.AWTOJ W 54SEMENT RIGHTS AND FINAL DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION 19 PENDING, 2) PROPOSED DRIVE AISLES, SIDEWALKS, LA4D13CAPING, PARKING TO BE DETER-IINED AT SOP SUBMITTAL. NN THINKTANK ■■2 1 . a I a amh a 'a 'ma' ceslgn me"i Patrick bareM - arCltlec( barb Patrlcko hktark hxlloret (pnane) 903-99Ti91B (m Ie) 303-960-9925 w PMUD - ODP SKETCH PLAN ODP 2 Jos NUMBER CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT THE INTENT OF THE JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC. MIXED-LLSE DE VELLAiENT IS TO REHABILITATE THIS FORMER GRAVEL MINE 517E INTO A VIBRANT MIX OF COMMERCIAL, RETAIL AND RESIDENTIAL USES SURROUNDING A PRIVATE LAKE AND LINEAR PARK WHICH WILL BE A VITAL MIO UNIQUE AMENITY FOR THE RESIDENTS AND PADSOINS OF THIS DEVELOPMENT AND THE GREATER COMMUNITY A MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMIW TP IS PROPOSED FOR THE UPPER BANNING AREA I AND WILL CONSIST OF MID -RISE APARTMEN75 ATGE 51RUDDRED HASSLING WITH COMPLEMENTARY RETAIL AMENITIES. THE ARCHITECTURE WILL FRONT AND ADDRESS THE STREET AND LOCAL PEDESTRIAN CORRIDORS AND WILL ALSO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE SITE TOPO'RAPHY TO PROVIDE VIEWS AND PEDESTRIAN ACCE55 TO THE LINEAR PARK ARE LAKEFRPIr. THE LOWER PENINSULA SITE N PLANNING AREA 1 IS PROPOSED TO HOUSE A NAIL MARINE DEALERSHIP FACILITY A WAKEBOARD CABLE PARI AND A FEATURE RESTAURANT THE DESIGN INTENT FOR ITS AREA 15 TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE INHERENT WATER FRONT CHARACTER AND DEVELOP THE ARCHITECTURE, THE LANDSCAPE AND THE 51TE AMENDIE5 INTO A DESiNATION. THE KEY FERC Y AND VISEUr OF THE DEVELOPMENT TO THE 1-10, WARD ROAD, AND WARD Sohill STATION CORRIDORS WILL OTHER A UNIQUE LEVEL OF VITALITY AND COMMWItt 5YNE BY THAT WILL BE FURTHER ENHANCED BY THE OVERALL COMPLEMENTARY ARCHITECTURAL, LANDSCAPE AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OF BOTH BANNNG AREAS CASE HISTORY THIS OUTLINE DEVELOflME1NT PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE, SPECIFIC OE VELOPMEM ELEMEMS SUCH AS SITE LAYOUT AND BWLOMG ARCHRECTUIF HAVE NOT BEEN ADDffSSED ON TATS DOCUMENT. AS A RESCUE, A SPECIFIC DE VELORMENT LAV MUST BE SUBMITTED AND AFFROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PRIOR TO THE 5UEPHTTAL OF A RIGHT-CF-WAT OR BWLOMG PERMIT APPLICATION AND ANY SIIBSEWENT SITE oEVELOFMENT STANDARD ODP NOTES THIS OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 15 CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. SPECIFIC DE VELORIENT ELBMENTB SUCH AS SITE LAYOUT AND BWLDMG ARCHITECTURE HAVE NOT BEEN ADD ES RE) CN THIS OOGUall. AS A RESWATT, A SPECIFlC DE VELOPPIENT PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDCi PRIOR TO THE SUBMITTAL OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY OR BWLDML PERMIT APPLICATION AND MIT SIIBSE LENT SITE OEVELP iMEN? ALL PARKING SHALL BE IN CONTECR ll WI7W SECTION :6-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL LAND`LAPMG SHALL BE IN CdJFOq-IANCE WITH SECTION 36-501 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, ALL E#ERM W LIGHTING SHALL BE M COMPORMANCE WITH SECTION 26-503 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS, ALL FENCING SHALL BE IN CPIWROMANCE WITH SECTION 26-603 OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CODE OF LAWS. ALL SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN COnFORMANCE WITH ARTICLE VII OF THE WHEAT RIOC£ CODE OF LAWS. ARCHITECNR4L, SITE, AND 57REET5CAPE DESIGN SHALL BE IN CONHORMANCE WITH THE ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE DESIGN MANUAL (ASOM) AND STffETSCAPE MANUAL 51GNAi - NO BILLBOARDS WILL BEIWANAI EO. - PROMINENT ADRff% SIGNS WILL BE NOTICED ALONG THE PRONTY£ ROAD OUTDOOR STORAC£: - BOATS TO BE DISPLAYED MID INVENTOR! STORED, IN PART, IN OUTDOOR AREA COMPLYll WITH WHEAT RIDGE CODE SECTION 26-628. - OTHER THAN THE BOAT BALES LOT, ALL OTHER OUTDOOR STORAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH WHEATRIO PE CODE SECTION 26-631. STANDARDS FOR OFT-5TREET VEHICULAR PARKUNAl BICYCLE PARKING, AND LOADING: PARKIW FOR MULTIUSE BUILDINGS SHOULD BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OR SIDE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURED PARKING IS ENCOURAGED, WHERE PRACTICAL. FREE-STANDING COMMERCIAL BULDINUE5 MAY PROVIDE SURFACE PARKING AT A RATE TO BE DETERMINED BASED ON THE SPECIFIC PROPOSED USE. BICYCLE PARKING ANO VEHICULAR LOADING FOR PASSENLER , AND, AS APPROP2IATE, MERCHAJDISE, SHALL BE PROVIDED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE PRIMARY ENTRANCE FOR ALL PRIMARY STRICTURES SERVICE LOADING AREAS FOR MAINTENANCE, SHIPPNG AND OTHER SIMILAR FUNCTIONS SHALL BE SEPARATE FROM THE FRMAR! ENTRANCE. STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND OUTDOOR STORMY£, DISPLAY AMC SALES: ACCEBBORM 57RIDTIRE5 SHALL BE ALLOWED, FROVIDED THAT TOTAL FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED THIRTY PERCENT OF THE FOOTPRINT OCCUPIED BY THE PRIMARY STRICTURE OR STRUCTURES ON THE SUBJECT LOT, PROJECT TEAM OULIER: ARCHITECT: JMB LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC TRINK TAW STUDIO, INC. ISE SOUTH LACE ROAD PO BOX IBI LAKEWOWD CO 00221 EDERICK. CO 80530 ff CPLT CT: HARD JOL5TAD CONTACT: PATRICK BERREND 303-61B-6663 ARCHITECT RICHER U 303-560--9325 SURVEYOR: RLBINO SURVEYINS CIVIL EMBINEEP 3312 AIRPORT ROAD ROCKY RIDGE CONSULTNNT5 BOULDER COLORADO W301 420 21st AVENUE CONTACT: ROBERT J. Tof PLS LcPsar T, CO 89501 (393)464-3515 CONTACT: JOEL BEAMONB, PE. �® 303-651-6626 JMS LAKE HOLDINGS, LLC PLANNED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT AN OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO TRACTS 9, YJ, M 6 tz NICHOLAS GArmEN6 E)CEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE DEPT. OF HIGHVIAY$ STATE OF COLORADO. IN A DEED RECORDED FEBRI-i K 18691N BOOK IM AT PAGE 964 A PORTON OF THE NORTHEAST 1/0 OF SECTION M TOWNSHIP 9 Seal RANGE W WEST BE THE BN P.M. CODMY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLOMDO CONTNNING 2273 ACRES MORE OR LESS ( 99029630 SF 4-1 WEST 1-70 FRONTAGE ROAD 0 1-70 VICINITY MAP:°moo SHEET INDEX: CDP1 1 CO VER SHEET OOP 21 LAND USE MAP The abyss sari deferent) a beat designated W ils), Perot do hereby, Agee Nat Ne pmpary legally destran 'bed baron will be rera'cryb as a Planned Donscpment In acWd3n® wily Me used real and coadir s contare] IF Ins plan, add as may Vital be requase W w I Idea ful reo-gl5e tat eppmrel o1 a remdrg P Plematl Daebpinni and apprwd V this outlre be a'cgna'11 pun, tices not create s rested Tease ty ni Vastetl pcFera rlgMs may only apse and accrue Tursient to tine prwil V Sector 26-121 of ton WHOU Pool Coae of Maws, Mean area of owta(a) a ball wro WII sun) SAP of Dtaradc I I as County of Jefferson 1 Tre real 1luwmat was aconaRedged board mat fab �y of AD 20_by Witness by MW Was olfical a1. My ¢mmbsm anprat Hdibry Pul 3URVEVORS CERTIFICATE Flood/ wrMy Nat to anal V Ne exami V (JMS Take Holdings) was vend by Ire or under my asset suµrvi5on ars to to best V ms: Imowletl¢, Ilrfortratlm arm Male' In accredited defy all 'Imes Cothays staWsby arras renised edlrun as rtar1hq the accom areng NOT accural reprisal sad sti (Srval MAD SRgrature SAM of Contain I 1 as Catty of Jefferson I 1 rcrsay Jai ibel Ins pen was filed in the data of Ne CouMy Clerk and Pamrci N Jefferson County at Go en Cdaadq al beat on Me alay an —J,D, IN Book_ Page_ , Radepdpn No JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER PLANNING COMMISSION CERTIFICATION IRewrtnended for eFpwal InTs day AT X to Widest Ridge Planning Commission. CUY CERTIFICATION Apiaretl this Jay of Vibe Wh5a1 Rdge Cry Cmnd ATTEST City Mark Mayor Control Dabonsof Director ■■ THINKTANK ■■ arcrmscros uman cesign meow patrlck barand - andial, rrarb patrlcke)30t-997LIlM (pnane) 903-997-9915 (rtCyle)(1D3-880-8825 PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ®DP 1 Jos NUMBER I� w Z U —j w m Z �® < w l -A z - w 0 w —j U1 0 � H i� /S In lll w w V U fY < ® 0 X4 Q w KI w w /S) PMUD - ODP COVER SHEET ®DP 1 Jos NUMBER BARGAIN AND SALE DEED County :'gate AlRe ll. Time .mplifile wvnv.simpli(le.mm THIS DEED made this day of February, 2016, between the City of Arvada, home rule municipal corporation of the State of Colorado, whose address is 8101 Ralst< Road, Arvada Colorado 80001 (grantor), and Grandwood Investments, LLC, (grantee), whose legal address is 1999 S. Lake Road, Lakewood, Colorado 80227 WITNESSETH, That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100----------DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is herby acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sol and conveyed, and by these presents does grant, bargain, sell, covey and confirm, unto the grantee, its successors and assigns forever, all the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, described as follows: See Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein Also known by street and number as: vacant land commonly referred to as the Ward Road Pond. TOGETHER, with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging , or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the grantors, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with hereditaments and appurtenances. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor executed this deed on the date set forth above. THE CIT)"O�F ARVADA, BY ITS MAYOR, MARC WILLIAMS Grantor 1600b31dSz9 7 p, 2-4 P° STATE OF COLORADO ss COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 7 �- The foregoing BARGAIN AND SALE DEED was acknowledged before me day of February by Marc Williams, as Mayor of the City of Arvada. JUDY L LYDICK NOTARY Pl18LIC WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF COLORADO I Notary ID 19924001773 MY COmmimon Expires 10/22/2017 (SEAL) My commission expires: /c - as - aci 7 PA EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tracts 9, 10, 11 and 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, EXCEPT that portion conveyed to The Department of Highways, State of Colorado, in Deed recorded February 21, 1968, in Book 1999, at Page 368, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of Lot 12, from which point the Northeast corner of Section 20, Township 3 South, Range 69 West bears North 63035'15" East, a distance of 1470.4 feet; thence South 64020'30" West, a distance of 46U feet; thence North 79°14' West, a distance of 497.1 feet; thence South 89°45'30" West, a distance of 314.5 feet; thence North 45°07'30" West, a distance of 70.6 feet; thence North 00°00'15" West, a distance of 122.1 feet; thence North 14°02'30" West, a distance of 103.1 feet to the West line of Lot 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, same being the Easterly present right-of-way line (November, 1964 of Ward Road; thence along the said Easterly present right-of-way line, South 00000'15" East, a distance of 873.8 feet to the South line of said Lot 9, the same being the North right-of-way line of a dedicated road; thence along the North right-of-way line of the dedicated Road, North 64°20'30" East, a distance of 1442.6 feet to the East line of Lot 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS; thence along the said East line of Lot 12, North 000161 West, a distance of 88.6 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning; AND EXCEPT that portion described in Rule and Order recorded January 20, 1972, in Book 2336, at Page 579, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of Tract 9 which is 161.7 feet South of the Northwest corner of Tract 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, thence South 9°55'45" East, a distance of 203.0 feet; thence South 0°00'15" East, parallel with the Wesi line of Tract 9, a distance of 110.0 feet; thence South 4°00'30" West, a distance 4 142.9 feet; thence North 14°02'30" West, a distance of 103.1 feet to the West lin of Tract 9; thence North 0°00'15" West, along the West line of Tract 9, a distanc of 352.5 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, in Deed recorded October 27, 1988, at Reception Number 88105019, described as follows: A portion of Tracts 9, 10, 11 and 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract 9; thence South 0'18'19" East (assumed bearing), along the West line of said Tract 9, a distance of 43.98 feet tc the South line of Section 17, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M.; thence South 0°15'12" East, along said West line, 55.52 feet; thence North 12014'03" East, 45.81 feet; thence Northeasterly, along a curve concave to the Southeast, having a radius of 27.00 feet, and a central angle of 73°15'10"; ther North 85°29'12" East 221.14 feet; thence North 89°07'50" East, parallel with t North line of said Tracts 9, 10, 11 and 12, a distance of 366.43 feet; thence Easterly, along a curve concave to the South, having a radius of 974.00 feet, a central angle of 14°20'54"; thence South 76°31'16" East, 16.17 feet; thence Easterly, along a curve concave to the North, having a radius of 367.03 feet, a central angle of 49'12'05", to the North line of Tracts 9, 10, 11 and 12; thence South 89°07'50 West, 1178.81 feet to the point of beginning, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. THINK TANK s t U d l o architecture urban design interiors 24 -June -19 The City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department 7500 West 29" Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn: Lauren Mikulak— Planning Manager Reference: 1MS Lake Holdings, LLC— Request for Rezone Application w/ ODP Dear Ms. Mikulak: Please see the attached Land Use Case Processing Application and supporting ODP materials for your review and consideration of the 1MS Lake Holdings, LLC request for re -zoning of the subject parcel located at the NE corner of Ward Road and Interstate 70 (Tracts 9-12 Nicholas Gardens). Scope: The owner (applicant) proposes to re -zone the 22.73 acre subject parcel from its current Agricultural Two (Ag -Two) designation to the Mixed Use Commercial Transit Oriented Development (MU -C TOD) to provide the flexibility for the future redevelopment of this former gravel mine site. The proposed project scope will entail a mix of commercial, retail and residential uses surrounding a private lake and linear park. We are proposing two planning areas for consideration: A multi -family residential community is proposed for the upper Planning Area 1 and will consist of mid -rise, medium density apartments with complementary retail amenities atop structured parking integrated and concealed within the existing site topography. The architecture will front and address the street and local pedestrian corridors and will also further take advantage of the existing topography to provide views and pedestrian access to the linear park and the lakefront. The lower, peninsula site in Planning Area 2 is proposed to house a retail marine dealership & service facility, a wakeboard cable park and a feature restaurant. The design intent for this areas is to take advantage of the inherent water -front character and develop the architecture, the landscape and the site amenities into a feature destination. Review Criteria: We believe this request for re -zone meets the intent and requirements of §26-303.D of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code for the following reasons: 1. We believe the rehabilitation of this former industrial site is to the benefit of life, safety and welfare of the subject property and community at -large. The proposed development will allow the applicant the ability to incorporate community enhancing businesses and amenities which will ameliorate the previous derelict use of the property. Further, the integration of this property with the surrounding TOD development is an inherent benefit not only to the applicant, but also to the future residents, business operators and the surrounding community as a whole. P.O. Box 781, Frederick, Colorado 80530-0781 © 303.997.4948 2. The proposed concept for Planning Area 1 and Planning Area could only be accomplished with the inherent flexibility afforded by a mixed-use zone district such as MU -C TOD. 3. Present locations of municipal infrastructure including site accesses, fire -protection and site utilities will be suitable for the applicant to connect. The applicant will provide for the infrastructure on private property as required to facilitate connection to municipal services. 4. Review Criteria Conditions: a. We believe the proposed request for re -zone is in complete alignment with the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan as well as with the overall nature and character of the RTD - Transit Oriented Development currently in progress one block to the north of this site. b. Not Applicable C. We believe that the adjacent RTD — Transit Oriented Development is so broad in its positive effects on this area of Wheat Ridge, that it is indeed in the interest of the community to encourage redevelopment of this site at this time. d. Not Applicable ODP Checklist Criteria: We believe the proposed request for change of zone district is fundamentally necessary for the applicant to rehabilitate this property in virtually any manner due to the limitations of the current Ag -Two zoning district. Since the conclusion of gravel mining operations on this site, it has been largely left derelict and is a blight on one of the main gateways into Wheat Ridge. The proposed rehabilitation will focus on the positive aspects of this site such as the lake and the topography and use them to best advantage to create a vibrant community that would complement and enhance the current development occurring in the immediate vicinity of this site. We believe the scale and density of proposed development would also be commensurate to that which is being developed in the immediate vicinity. Site access is currently being studied in conjunction with CDOT and the City of Wheat Ridge Engineering Department to best meet the needs of the development and restrictions on the adjacent arterials. We believe that the best access to the upper Planning Area 1 will be from the 1-70 Frontage Road — North, approximately mid -block, a minimum of 350 feet East of Ward Road. The proposed access to Planning Area 2 will be the historic access pointjust past the apex of the curve on 1-70 Frontage Road — North. There is presently a curb -cut at this location and there is an access and drainage easement on the property at this location to facilitate access to the peninsula site. Municipal utilities are all presently contained within the 1-70 Frontage Road — North, and the connections will be proposed at or near the site access points identified for Planning Area 1 & Planning Area 2. Preliminary inquiry with Arvada Fire Protection has indicated feasibility for the proposed uses and access points, but the engineering of fire protection water service needs to each site has yet to be determined. To conclude, we again believe this application for re -zoning of the subject parcel is in keeping of the intent and statutory guidelines outlined in the City of Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code and further believe this proposal to be complementary and synergistic with the development activities underway in the immediate vicinity. We look forward to receiving your input and feedback on this proposal. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or should you require further information. Regards: Patrick Berrend —Architect, NCARB Enclosures: ODP Application Materials L A N D S E R V I C E S OIL AND GAs TITLE P.O. Box 336337 Phone (970) 351-0733 Greeley, CO 80633-0606 Fax (970) 351-0867 LIST OF MINERAL OWNERS AND MINERAL LESSEES for NOTIFICATION (JMS Lake Holdings, LLC Property) Subject Property: Township 3 South Range 69 West, 6th P.M., Jefferson County, CO Those tracts of land being more particularly described on Exhibit A, being a part of the NE% of Section 20 and SE% of Section 17 Zeren Land Services, an oil and gas title research company, states that to the best of its knowledge the following is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of the mineral owners and mineral leasehold owners entitled to notice under the Surface Development Notification Act, Colorado Revised Statutes §24-65.5-101, et seq. in the Subject Property based upon the records of the Jefferson County Assessor and Clerk Recorder as of July 3, 2019 at 7:45 a.m.: Mineral Owners: Mineral Leasehold Owners: None (entitled to notice) None (entitled to notice) Dated this 22"d day of July, 2019. ZEREN LAND SERVICES f� L By?)Cynthia A. E. Zeren, C'Pt Certified Professional Landman #4044 Page 1 of 4 At the request of Think Tank Stuido ("Client"), Zeren Land Services, an independent land consulting firm, has prepared the foregoing list of mineral estate owners entitled to notice under the Surface Development Notification Act, Colorado Revised Statutes §24-65.5-101, et seq. Zeren Land Services, searched (i) the records of the Jefferson County Assessor relating to the Subject Property for persons identified therein as mineral estate owners, and (ii) the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder relating to the Subject Property for recorded requests for notification in the form specified in the Surface Development Notification Act. The results of these searches are set forth above in this List of Mineral Owners Entitled to Notice. At the date of the search, the records of the Assessor and the Clerk and Recorder were posted through July 3, 2019 at 7:45 A.M. Zeren Land Services, agreed to prepare this listing for the Client only if the Client agreed that the liability of Zeren Land Services, would be strictly limited to the amount paid by the Client for such services. Zeren Land Services, makes no warranty, express, implied or statutory, in connection with the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of such listing of mineral estate owners. In the event the listing proves to be inaccurate, incomplete, insufficient or otherwise defective in any way whatsoever or for any reason whatsoever, the liability of Zeren Land Services, shall never exceed the actual amount paid by Client to Zeren Land Services, for the listing. In order to induce Zeren Land Services, to provide such services, Client further agreed to indemnify and hold Zeren Land Services, its managers, members and employees, harmless from and against all claims by all persons (including, but not limited to Client) of whatever kind or character arising out of the preparation and use of each such listing of mineral estate owners, to the extent that such claims exceed the actual amount paid to Client by Zeren Land Services, for such listing. Client specifically intends that both the foregoing limitation on liability and foregoing indemnification shall be binding and effective without regard to the cause of the claim, inaccuracy or defect, including, but not limited to, breach of representation, warranty or duty, any theory of tort or of breach of contract, or the fault or negligence of any party (including Zeren Land Services) of any kind or character (regardless of whether the fault or negligence is sole, joint, concurrent, simple or gross). Client's use of this listing evidences Client's acceptance of, and agreement with, this limitation on liability and the indemnification. Date: July 22, 2019 ZEREN L:',ND SERVICES By: Cynthia +4. E. Zeren, as Presici 'nt !r Page 2 of 4 a radius of 27.00 feet, and a central angle of 73°15'10"; thence North 85°29'12" East 221.14 feet; thence North 89°07'50" East, parallel with the North line of said Tracts 9,10, 11 and 12, a distance of 366.43 feet; thence Easterly, along a curve concave to the South, having a radius of 974.00 feet, and a central angle of 14°20'54"; thence South 76°31'16" East, 16.17 feet; thence Easterly, along a curve concave to the North, having a radius of 367.03 feet, and a central angle of 49°12'05", to the North line of Tracts 9, 10, 11 and 12; thence South 89°07'50" West, 1178.81 feet to the Point of Beginning. Page 4 of 4 EXHIBIT A Township 3 South. Range 69 West of the 6th P.M. Those tracts of land being a part of the NE'/< of Section 20 and the SEY of Section 17, being more particularly described as follows: Tracts 9, 10, 11 and 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, according to that certain plat or map recorded April 251h, 1907 in Book 2 at Page 6013; EXCEPT that portion conveyed to The Department of Highways, State of Colorado, in Deed recorded February 21, 1968, in Book 1999 at Page 368, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of Lot 12, from which point the Northeast corner of said Section 20, bears North 63°35'15" East, a distance of 1470.4 feet; thence South 64°20'30" West, a distance of 468.4 feet; thence North 79'14' West, a distance of 497.1 feet; thence South 89°45'30" West, a distance of 314.5 feet; thence North 45"07'30" West, a distance of 70.6 feet; thence North 00`00'15" West, a distance of 122.1 feet; thence North 14°02'30" West, a distance of 103.1 feet to the West line of Lot 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, same being the Easterly present right-of-way line (November, 1964) of Ward Road; thence along the said Easterly present right-of-way line, South 00°00'15" East, a distance of 873.8 feet to the South line of said Lot 9, the same being the North right-of-way line of a dedicated road; thence along the North right-of-way line of the dedicated Road, North 64020'30" East, a distance of 1442.6 feet to the East line of Lot 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS; thence along the said East line of Lot 12, North 00°16' West, a distance of 88.6 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning; AND EXCEPT that portion described in Rule and Order recorded January 20, 1972, in Book 2336 at Page 579, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the West line of Tract 9 which is 161.7 feet South of the Northwest corner of Tract 9, NICHOLAS GARDENS, thence South 9°55'45" East, a distance of 203.0 feet; thence South 0°55'15" East, parallel with the West line of Tract 9, a distance of 110.0 feet; thence South 4°00'30" West, a distance of 142.9 feet; thence North 14"02'30" West, a distance of 103.1 feet to the West line of Tract 9; thence North 0°00'15" West, along the West line of Tract 9, a distance of 352.5 feet, more or less, to the Point of Beginning, EXCEPT that portion conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge, in Deed recorded October 27, 1988, under Reception Number 88105019, described as follows: A portion of Tracts 9, 10,11 and 12, NICHOLAS GARDENS, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Tract 9; thence South 0'18'19" East (assumed bearing), along the West line of said Tract 9, a distance of 43.98 feet to the South line of Section 17, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M.; thence South 0°15'12" East, along said West line, 55.52 feet; thence North 12014'03" East, 45.81 feet; thence Northeasterly, along a curve concave to the Southeast, having Page 3 of 4 City O .. COMMUNiTy DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29`x' Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 NOTICE TO MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS APPLICANTS: You must submit this completed form to the Community Development Department no later than ten (10) days before the public hearing on your application. Failure to complete and submit this Certification of Notice shall constitute sufficient grounds to reschedule your public hearing. I, , as of/with (Print name) (Position/Job Title) (Entity applying for permit/approval) (hereinafter, referred to as the "Applicant"), do hereby certify that notice of the application for , set for public hearing on (Describe type of application) 20_, has been sent to all mineral estate owners at least thirty (30) days before the public hearing, as required by § 24-65.5-103(1), C.R.S., or, in the alternative, that the records of the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder do not identify any mineral estate owners of any portion of the property subject to the above referenced application. -OR- Check here if there are no mineral estate owners of any portion of the subject property. I hereby further certify that I am authorized by the Applicant to make representations contained herein and act as the Applicant's agent for purposes of this Certificate of Notice and bind the Applicant to these representations by my signature below. Dated this -Zf day of ��� , 201 Rev 5/2014 u, City of Wheat�dge COMMUNITYDM 0PTT Submittal Checklist: Outline Development Plan (ODP) Project Name: Project Location: Application Contents: The outline development plan (ODP) establishes the planned development zoning and summarizes overall development concepts, permitted uses, and development parameters. It also provides a general graphic layout of proposed building pads and proposed circulation concepts. The following items represent a complete ODP application. 1. Completed, notarized land use application form 2. Application fee 3. Signed submittal checklist (this document) 4. Proof of ownership—e.g. deed 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent ads on behalf of the owner(s) — 6. Mineral rights certification form _7. Approved legal description on the Current City Datum with proper section and PHAC ties per City Geodetic Requirements, in Microsoft Word format _8. ODP document—see form and content requirements below _ Two (2) full size paper copies (24" x 36") _ One (1) reduced size paper copy (11" x 17") AutoCAD .dwg file format—confirm acceptable version with city staff 9. Civil documents, if required _10. Written request and description of the proposal _ Include a response to the zone change review criteria—these are found in Section 26-303.D of the municipal code Include a justification of why the zone change is appropriate addressing these issues: • The need for the zone change. • Present and future effect on the existing zone districts, development and physical character of the area. • Access to the area, traffic patterns and impact of the requested zone on these factors. • Availability of utilities. • Present and future effect on public facilities and services, such as fire, police, water, sanitation, roadways, parks, schools, etc. • A discussion of the relationship between the proposal and adopted land and/or policies of the city. _11. Electronic (Adobe .pdf) files of all submittal documents—these may be provided via email, CD, DVD, or USB flash drive Community Development Department (303) 2352846 www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Form and content of Outline Development Plan: Note: ODP amendments may not require all items listed herein. Required content will be determined at the pre -application meeting. Project information _1. Title of document – centered at top of page in the following format: [Name] Planned [Commercial/Residential/Industrial...] Development An Outline Development Plan in the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado A Part of the _ 1/4 Section, Township 3 South ... 2. Vicinity map 3. Scale and north arrow—scale not to exceed 1"=100' 4. Date of plan preparation and name/address of who prepared the plan 5. Legal description 6. Appropriate signature blocks – see cover sheet handout 7. Signed surveyor's certification 8. Case history with applicable land use case numbers _9. Ownership/unified control statement, if applicable _10. Name/Address/Phone number(s) of architect, engineer, or surveyor associated with the project 11. Character of development – summarize in paragraph form the character of the project 12. Description of amendment, if applicable 13. Standard ODP note: This outline development plan is conceptual in nature. Specific development elements such as site layout and building architecture have not been addressed on this document. As a result, a specific development plan must be submitted and approved by the City of Wheat Ridge prior to the submittal of a right-of-way or building permit application and any subsequent site development. _14. Standard notes unless modified by the planned development: All parking shall be in conformance with Section 26-501 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. All landscaping shall be in conformance with Section 26-502 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. All exterior lighting shall be in conformance with Section 26-503 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. All fencing shall be in conformance with Section 26-603 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws All signage shall be in conformance with Article VII of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. Architectural, site, and streetscape design shall be in conformance with the Architectural and Site Design Manual (ASDM) and Streetscape Design Manual. Development standards Note: ODP documents should not list exact square footage, setbacks, and other dimensions/quantities even if they are known for a particular development. The ODP shall identify the development parameters in terms of maximum and minimum standards. The SDP is the document that will identify exact dimensions, quantities, etc. The following information may be provided in text and/or table format. 1. List of permitted land uses 2. Standards for signage, lighting, fencing, screening and landscaping 3. Standards for off-street vehicular parking, bicycle parking, and loading _4. Standards for accessory structures and outdoor storage, display, and sales _5. Standards for architecture and site design, if varying from the Architectural and Site Design Manual or other applicable design standards. The following standards shall be provided in table format. 6. Maximum building coverage 7. Minimum landscape coverage and open space 8. Minimum lot sizes, dimensions, net density, and gross density 9. Minimum perimeter setback or build -to lines _10. Minimum separation between buildings _11. Maximum building height Sketch plan The site plan drawing shall be to -scale, but may be in sketch format. The plan shall include the following: 1. Scale and north arrow (scale not to exceed 1" = 100') _2. Property boundary — must correspond to legal description _3. Proposed/internal lot lines — if they differ from the existing legal description or will be modified by a subsequent subdivision plat _4. Proposed circulation concepts — include rights-of-way, access points, drive aisles and sidewalks _5. General areas to be used for landscaping, parking, and building pads _6. General areas to be used for drainage, parks, and other areas to be reserved or dedicated to public use _7. Location and type of significant land features within or adjacent to the property, such as irrigation ditches, streams, lakes, and topography _8. Zoning for adjacent properties _9. Adjoining property lot lines, building access, and parking — show sufficient information so that that development compatibility can be determined Additional information which may be required: Depending on the size, scope, and complexity of the request additional documents may be required. The submission of these documents will be discussed during the pre -application meeting. This includes, but is not limited to, the following documents (one paper copy plus Adobe .pdf file is required): 1. Trip generation letter or traffic study 2. Drainage report and plan 3. Soils report 4. Erosion control plan 1. Drainage study and plan 2. Traffic impact report 3. Grading plan 4. Geological stability report _5. Floodplain impact report _6. General environmental impact report As applicant for this project, 1 hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. 1 fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, 1 understand that in the event any revisions need to be made after the second (2"d) full review, 1 will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. Signature: Date: Name (please print): Phone: 3 6 s 0 o. jo II �. 4' .411114 4. e H w � �t 6 s 0 o. jo II �. 4' .411114 �"� Community Development �Whea� City of 7500 West 29th Avenue COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT tdge Wheat Ridge' Colorado 80033 Ph: 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Community Development Referral Form Date Mailed: July 2, 2019 Response Due: July 19, 2019 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of a zone change with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) on the vacant land at the southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road. No response from you will constitute having no objections or concerns regarding this proposal. Case #: WZ-19-03 /Ward Road Pond ODP Request: The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Agricultural -Two (A-2) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD). The ODP sets the development standards and zoning for this project. Any specific applications for site development will be referred to you in the future under separate Specific Development Plan (SDP) applications, and any lot line changes would be referred to you as a subdivision application. The proposed ODP divides the site into two planning areas. Planning Area 1 (PA1) would be located at the northwest of the site and would allow a variety of uses including multifamily residential, office, retail, recreational uses, and institutional uses. The applicant's narrative describes their intent to develop a multifamily residential component with retail amenities, which would be pursued under a future SDP application if the ODP is approved. Planning Area 2 includes the pond and the peninsula at the east of the site and would allow the same uses as PA1; the applicant intends to develop a retail boat dealership and service center and a recreational wakeboard cable park utilizing the existing pond under a future SDP. The ODP establishes the allowed uses for the site, which includes these uses in their respective planning areas. It also shows two conceptual access points onto the Frontage Road and conceptual building locations. The site is located at the southeast corner of W. 1-70 Frontage Road North and Ward Road and is currently vacant. The property is zoned Agricultural -Two (A-2) and includes a large pond that takes up most of the site. The site consists of four large parcels which may be consolidated or reconfigured as part of future development. The site is approximately 22.7 acres, the majority of which is the pond. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager: Case Manager: Scott Cutler Phone: 303.235.2849 Email: scutler@ci.wheatridge.co.us Fax: 303.235.2849 DISTRIBUTION: Valley Water District Fruitcale Sanitation District Arvada Fire District Xcel Energy Comcast Century Link Wheat Ridge Public Works Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Economic Development Wheat Ridge Police Department Colorado Department of Transportation City of Arvada Vicinity Map A NOTE: Land use applications must be submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a CIN,, of planner. Incomplete applications will not V-"t- D -j�ra be accepted—refer to submittal checklists. LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 291h Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant JMS Lake Holdinqs, LLC Phone 303.318.6663 Address, City, State, Zip 1999 South Lake Road -`Lakewood, CO 80227 Owner_JMS Lake Holdings, LLC Phone 303.318.6663 Address, City, State, Zip 1999 South Lake Road - Lakewood, CO 80227 Contact Think Tank Studio, Inc. Address, City, State, Zip PO Box 781 - Frede Phone 303.960.9925 k. CO 80530-0781 Email drjolypcomcast.net Email drjoly@comcast.net Email patrick@thinktankstudio.net (The person listed as contact will be contacted to answer questions regarding this application, provide additional information when necessary, post public hearing signs, will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing, and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written commnumication to applicant and owner.) Location of request (address): Tracts 9, 10, 11 & 12, Nicholas Gardens (NE corner 1-70 & Ward Road Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): 71 Change of Zone or Zone Conditions O Special Use Permit O Planned Development (ODP, SDP) O Conditional Use Permit D Planned Building Group O Site Plan 71 Temporary Use, Building, Sign O Concept Plan D Variance/Waiver (from Section 26- ) O Right of Way Vacation Detailed description of request: Re -zone request for the subject property frc development of the site into two proposed 1 upper site proposes mixed-use multifamily I parking. Planning Area 2 on the peninsula wakeboard cable park and feature restaural I certilw that the information and exhibits herewith submitted are trice and carr fling this application, I am acting with the knowledge and consent of,those pei the requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished. Applicants otlier tl n c frons the owner which approved of this action on e alf. Notarized Signature of Applicant State of Colorado ,���/ } ss County of The foregoi by _XV ^ Notary To be filled out by staff: Date received Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. Assessor's Parcel No. °l - aol -01-(�02 Size (acresorsgft) '?_ler Ae{eS was acknowledged by me this ZJ day of -5 r, , 20� GRANT H OUMBAY My commission expires Notary Public / �i /20 I State of Colorado Notary ID 0154039009 Fee$ Receipt No. C !).2 1155- Pre-App 1 5SPre-App Mtg. Date 7 -11_` 1$' Current Zoning 'j q - ;Z Proposed Zoning - f -C Tp[] Case No. W 1- 19-6 Quarter Section Map , E 2 Case Manager Current Use r1Con� Lnna Lam Proposed Use 19