Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-14-22 City Council MeetingAGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO February 14, 2022 7:00 p.m. This meeting will be conducted as a VIRTUAL MEETING ONLY . No members of the Council or City staff will be physically present at the Municipal building for this meeting. The public may participate in these ways: 1. Provide comment in advance at www.wheatridgespeaks.org (comment by noon on February 14, 2022). 2. Virtually attend and participate in the meeting through a device or phone: • Click here to join or provide public comment. • Or call +1-669-900-6833 with Access Code: 862 4362 2407 Passcode: 194303 3. View the meeting live or later at www.wheatridgespeaks.org, Channel 8, or YouTube Live at https://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/view Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Those requiring assistance, ASL or translation service for languages other than English are asked to contact the Public Information Officer at 303- 235-2877 or wrpio@ci.wheatridge.co.us with as much notice as possible. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES • September 20, 2021 Study Session Notes • December 13, 2021 City Council Meeting Minutes • January 10, 2022 City Council Meeting Minutes • January 24, 2022 City Council Meeting Minutes • January 24, 2022 Special Study Session Notes APPROVAL OF AGENDA PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES Black History Month PUBLICS’ RIGHT TO SPEAK a. Public may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of 3 minutes under Publics’ Right to Speak. Please speak up to be heard when directed by the Mayor. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: February 14, 2022 Page -2- b. Members of the Public who wish to speak on a Public Hearing item or Decision, Resolution, or Motion may speak when directed by the Mayor at the conclusion of the staff report for that specific agenda item. c. Members of the Public may comment on any agenda item in writing by noon on the day of the meeting at www.WheatRidgeSpeaks.org. Comments made on Wheat Ridge Speaks are considered part of the public record. 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. A resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2022 budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the re-appropriation and re-encumbrance of 2021 fiscal year encumbered funds in the amount of $4,475,027.97 b. Motion to approve installation of a traffic calming device on 46th avenue between Lamar Street and Jay Street in accordance with the neighborhood traffic management program PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 2. Council Bill No. 01-2022 – An ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) (Case No. WZ-21-12) ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS 3. Motion to accept grants from the State of Colorado Highway Safety Office in the amount of $44,359 to provide education, outreach and enforcement for traffic and pedestrian safety 4. Motion to amend and extend the contract for professional services to AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Greenwood Village, CO, for Fiscal Year 2022, in an amount not to exceed $1,778,778 and approve payments for ongoing program management services for the Investing 4 the Future Program CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS ADJOURNMENT Adjourn to Special Study Session PROCLAMATION BLACK HISTORY MONTH FEBRUARY 2022 WHEREAS, February’s Black History Month is an annual celebration of achievements by Black Americans, recognition of their central role in U.S. history, and a time to reflect on the continued struggle for racial justice and equality; and WHEREAS, experts say understanding Black history and learning more about systemic racism is essential for our country to grow as a nation; and WHEREAS, Carter G. Woodson, known as the “Father of Black History,” developed Black History Month. Woodson, whose parents were enslaved, was an author, historian and the second Black American to earn a Ph.D. at Harvard University; and WHEREAS, Woodson chose February to coincide with the birthdays of Frederick Douglass, a famed abolitionist who escaped from slavery, and President Abraham Lincoln, who formally abolished slavery; and WHEREAS, with the resolution passed in 2020, Wheat Ridge City Council confirmed that “racism and hate have no place in our City and there is much work to be done to stop pervasive, long-standing, and devastating racial injustices in our community”; and WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Race and Equity Task Force which consists of diverse and multiple perspectives began working in 2021 to review City policies, services, ordinances and community systems and identify policies and practices that contribute to discrimination; and WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge recognizes the importance of Black History Month and our ongoing commitment to continuous improvement and self-reflection in order to become a more inclusive and responsive community. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Wheat Ridge Mayor and City Council formally designate the month of February 2022, as BLACK HISTORY MONTH IN WITNESS WHEREOF, on this 14th day of February 2022. __________________________ Bud Starker, Mayor Steve Kirkpatrick, City Clerk Page 1 STUDY SESSION NOTES CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Hybrid - Virtual Meeting September 20, 2021 Mayor Bud Starker called the Study Session to order at 6:31 p.m. This meeting was conducted both as a virtual meeting and hybrid, where some members of the Council or City staff were physically present at the Municipal building, and some members of the public attended in person as well. All eight members of Council were present in Council Chambers for this session. Mayor Starker welcomed the Council, other elected officials, staff and interested citizens. The Mayor also explained the virtual/hybrid meeting format, how citizens will have the opportunity to be heard, and the procedures and policies to be followed. Council members present Amanda Weaver, Judy Hutchinson, Zach Urban, Janeece Hoppe, Korey Stites, Valerie Nosler Beck, and Rachel Hultin. In the Mayor’s absence, the Mayor Pro Tem, Janeece Hoppe presided. Also, present: City Manager, Patrick Goff; City Clerk, Steve Kirkpatrick; City Treasurer, Chris Miller; Administrative Services Director, Allison Scheck; Chief of Police, Chris Murtha; Director of Parks and Recreation, Karen O’Donnell; Assistant to the City Manager, Marianne Schilling; Director of Community Development, Ken Johnstone; Director of Public Works, Greg Knutson; approximately 6 interested citizens and guests. Citizen’s Right to Speak John Wood, representing the Wheat Ridge Historical Society came to support budget increases for the Society. The proposed budget enables the Society to staff the museum, archive historical documents and serve those interested in exploring and researching our City history. He thanked the City staff and the Mayor and Council for their ongoing support of the Society, in the budget and in many other ways. Note about Wheat Ridge Speaks: Citizens may visit the Wheat Ridge Speaks website and enter written comments of up to 1,000 words on any Council agenda item. The deadline for citizens to submit comments is 12:00 Noon Mountain Time on the day of a Council session so that Council members, other elected officials and City Staff have time to review the comments before the meeting on Monday evening. The City Clerk’s Office transcribes those Wheat Ridge Speaks comments into these minutes, placing each comment along with the record for that agenda item. No comments on tonight’s agenda appears in WR Speaks this week. Page 2 1. 2022 Proposed Budget Presentation Discussion began at 6:39 pm, approximately 0: minutes into the recording of the session. Issue Tonight’s only agenda item is the proposed 2022 City Budget presentation to City Council for review and discussion. This memorandum includes an outline of the public engagement steps that have occurred to date and the future actions required by City Charter to adopt the budget. In addition, the 2022 Budget Message is included which summarizes the various components of the proposed budget. Staff Reports City Manager Patrick Goff and Administrative Services Director, Allison Scheck, delivered to Council a detailed presentation about this item, and the financial impacts for bringing it to Council. Those include Prior and future actions to include the dates: • October 11, 2021 – as required by Section 10.7 of the Wheat Ridge City Charter a public hearing will be conducted to provide an additional opportunity for residents to comment on the proposed budget prior to its adoption. Notification of the public hearing will be made on the City Website, City Facebook page, and in the Jeffco Transcript. • October 11. 2021 – as required by Section 10.9 of the Wheat Ridge City Charter, the budget shall be adopted by resolution on or before the final day (December 15, 2021) established by state statute for the certification of the next year’s tax levy to the county The proposed 2021 budget includes the following: • A General Fund budget in the amount of $44,169,781 • An unrestricted fund balance of $11,042,057 or 25% of expenditures • A General Fund transfer of $6,995,445 to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) • A General Fund transfer of $500,000 to the Equipment Replacement Fund • Proposed CIP Fund in the amount of $21,763,305 • Proposed Renewal Wheat Ridge Bonds Project Fund in the amount of $5,900,000 • Proposed 2E Fund in the total amount of $3,884,083 • Special Revenue Funds in the amount of $6,405,134 • Proposed budget (all funds) in the amount of $82,122,303 Page 3 Councilmembers had questions and comments about the budget request, which they discussed with key staff leadership in depth: Mayor Pro Tem Hoppe proposed a consensus to add $3,500 to the proposed budget for outreach 2022. Consensus attained. The Mayor Pro Tem proposed a consensus for staff to review and bring to Council the budget for the City of Wheat Ridge in 2022 and prepare for the mandated public hearing on the budget prescribed in Charter and Code, scheduled for October 11, 2021. Consensus attained. 2. Staff Report(s) Discussion began at pm, approximately 3:00 hours into the recording of the session 3. Elected Officials’ Report(s) Discussion of this item began at approximately PM. Councilmember Hoppe asked about Clear Creek Closing public art plans. Staff provided a detailed answer. Councilmember Urban reported on his research into restricted covenants in Wheat Ridge and asked that the City Attorney do further research into what Council can do in terms of these codicils in property deeds. Councilmember Hutchinson thanked the staff for all of their hard work on the budget. Councilmember Stites Councilmember Hultin The District II meeting will be held October 2nd at 10 AM. Councilmember Weaver asked about voter registration and where voters can track their registration, change their address or party affiliation, and track their ballots. Councilmember Nosler Beck thanked her neighbors who once again held a neighborhood gathering that she greatly appreciated and much enjoyed. Councilmember Hoppe ADJOURNMENT The Study Session adjourned at 9:34 pm. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 14, 2022. Page 4 Steve Kirkpatrick, City Clerk Janeece Hoppe, Mayor Pro Tem City Council Meeting Minutes CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING December 13, 2021 Note: This meeting was conducted both as a virtual meeting and hybrid, where some members of the Council or City staff were physically present at the Municipal building, and some members of the public attended in person as well. All eight members of Council were present in Council Chambers for this session. Before calling the meeting to order, Mayor Starker stated the rules and procedures necessitated by this meeting format. Mayor Starker called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Judy Hutchinson Scott Ohm Rachel Hultin Janeece Hoppe Amanda Weaver Korey Stites Leah Dozeman Valerie Nosler Beck Also, present: City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; City Manager, Patrick Goff; Director of Administration, Allison Scheck; Director of Parks & Recreation, Karen O’Donnell; Community Development Director, Ken Johnstone; Lauren Mikulak, Planning Supervisor; Deputy City Clerk, Robin Eaton, other staff, guests and interested Members of the Public. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Without objection or correction, the City Council Minutes of October 25, 2021 (revised) were approved as published. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Without objection or correction, the agenda stood as announced. Mayor Starker at 7:02 pm, announced that all members of the city council are now present. PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES Mayor Starker read and presented the Proclamation and Ceremonies Wheat Ridge 101 Graduation The Proclamation recognizes the residents of Wheat Ridge who have recently completed Wheat Ridge 101, a course offered by the City staff about the structure, workings and roles and responsibilities of City staff and our 11 elected officials. City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 2 Longs Peak Metropolitan District Reimbursement to the City and Clear Creek Crossing Development Update Ceremony for Longs Peak Metropolitan District and Evergreen Development Company Executive Vice-President from Longs Peak Tyler Carlson who presented Mayor Starker with a partial re-imbursement check in the amount of $9.8 million. 2021 Patrol Officer Recruits Introduction Mayor Starker and Chief Murtha welcomed and introduced the class 2021 who were sworn in as certified police officers. PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO SPEAK No one came forward to speak this evening. Note about Wheat Ridge Speaks: Members of the Public may visit the Wheat Ridge Speaks website and enter written comments of up to 1,000 words on any Council agenda item. The deadline for members of the public to submit comments is 12:00 Noon Mountain Time on the day of a Council session so that Council members, other elected officials and City Staff have time to review the comments before the meeting on Monday evening. The City Clerk’s Office transcribes those Wheat Ridge Speaks comments into these minutes, placing each comment along with the record for that agenda item, including items that address a public hearing (verbatim, if the comments do not contain lascivious language or unlawful hate speech). No one entered comments in WR Speaks for this Council session. No comments appeared in WR Speaks for this Council Meeting. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Discussion began at approximately 7:22 PM CM Ohm introduced the consent agenda. a. Motion to approve monthly payments to Kaiser Permanente for January through December 2022 membership billing not to exceed a total of $2,800,000 Issue The City offers employees two medical plans through Kaiser Permanente: A High Deductible plan and Deductible HMO Plan. Both plans are also offered as COBRA protection for former employees who choose to enroll. January through December billing, inclusive of the City’s and employee’s portion, is estimated at $2,800,000. Staff requests approval of the estimated annual 2022 expenditure so that monthly invoices can be paid in a timely manner. City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 3 b. Motion to adopt the 2022 City Council meeting calendar Issue The calendar of City Council meetings is adopted by a motion of the City Council annually. Adopting the meeting calendar for the year is more efficient and enables the Mayor, Council and staff to schedule other events and travel in advance. The Council will be able to amend the schedule by motion throughout the year, if necessary. The following City Council meetings that conflict with observed City holidays or other known events during the year are recommended for cancellation. President Biden signed a bill in June 2021 recognizing Juneteenth (June 19th) as a federal holiday. Numerous Denver metro area cities have chosen to recognize Juneteenth as an official holiday starting in 2022 including Golden and Lakewood. Staff recommends that City Council add Juneteenth as an official holiday starting in 2022. • Study Session, January 17, 2022, Martin Luther King Jr. Day • Study Session, February 21, 2022, Presidents’ Day • Study Session, June 20, 2022, Juneteenth • Study Session, July 4, 2022, Independence Day • Study Session, September 5, 2022, Labor Day • Regular City Council Meeting, December 26, 2022, Christmas Day c. Motion to cancel the December 20, 2021 study session of the Wheat Ridge City Council Issue The Study Session of December 20, 2021 currently does not have any scheduled agenda items. In order to provide time for City Council and Staff to spend the Christmas holiday with family and friends, it is recommended that City Council cancel this meeting. d. Resolution No. 57-2021 - a resolution approving an intergovernmental agreement with Jefferson County Public Health for hosting youth community events Issue Staff members within the Parks & Recreation Department are currently serving as part of the Jefferson County Communities That Care Coalition. Through this coalition, funding opportunities were presented, which require an intergovernmental agreement (IGA). To maximize available resources for teen programming in the City of Wheat Ridge, staff is requesting the approval of this resolution. The IGA specifically outlines the relationship between The City of Wheat Ridge and Jefferson County Public Health (JCPH) in offering at least three, but no more than six free teen events in venues provided by the City of Wheat Ridge throughout the year. City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 4 The tasks outlined include, but are not limited to promotion, hosting of activities, compensation, equipment, food, etc. Additionally, the IGA details the recruitment and compensation of three youth interns who will be tasked with promoting the events and hosting activities at each event. Specifically, JCPH will compensate the City $1,000 for each event hosted in compliance with this agreement. Motion by CM Ohm to approve Consent Agenda Items a.), b.), c.) and d.), Seconded by CM Stites; motion carried 8-0 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 2. Council Bill No. 21-2021 - An Ordinance rezoning property at 4051 Clear Creek Drive from Planned Commercial to Planned Mixed Use, with and outline development plan, to allow an expanded list of permitted uses, including residential (WZ-21-04 – Clear Creek Crossing) Discussion began at approximately 7:23 pm CM Stites introduced Council Bill 21-2021 Issue The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) with an Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at approximately 4051 Clear Creek Drive. The request will add an additional planning area (Planning Area 9) to Clear Creek Crossing Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. The Mayor reviewed the procedures. No citizens appeared in chambers to address this issue. There were none who wanted to speak through the Zoom format. Deputy City Clerk Eaton assigned Ordinance No. 1727 Staff Presentation Mr. Dahl reviewed the previous discussions and study session outputs on this item. He also questioned CM Ohm about his previous planning commission votes on this issue. Motion by CM Hultin to approve CM Ohm’s participation in this item Council Bill 21- 2021 based on his answers to Mr. Dahl’s question. Second by CM Hoppe, Motion carried 6-1 with CM Dozeman voting no and CM Ohm abstaining. Scott Cutler, Senior Planner entered items into the record and stated that the city council has jurisdiction to hear the item. He presented that the property is located beyond the current northern terminus of Clear Creek Drive, on the west side of the Clear Creek Drive right-of-way and north of W. 40th Avenue. The existing street currently ends as a cul-de-sac with a trail extending to Clear Creek. To the west of the property is unincorporated Jefferson County, to the north and east is the Clear Creek City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 5 Crossing development (currently under construction), and to the south is a Coors Brewing Company water storage facility. Coors currently owns the subject property, and there is a minor lot line adjustment underway to allow the transfer of ownership to Evergreen and creating the approximately 13-acre site. There is an 80-foot-wide Denver Water easement that covers Clear Creek Drive to the northeast and parallel to the northeast property line. The proposed PMUD zoning is required in order to accommodate the proposed residential use and to remove the FAR restrictions on this property. It’s also necessary to ensure compatible site and building design. The proposed zoning incorporates many standards and principles of the Clear Creek Crossing ODP, and Design Pattern Book approved in 2018. However, the rezoning for the subject property is considered a stand- alone application with its own customized standards with the creation of Planning Area 9. Tyler Carlson from Evergreen Partners also spoke on the item, where the previous property owners did not want to participate or sell the property as an ODP. Early the year they were able to purchase and submit a request to rezone it into the proper designation. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions and comments CM Nosler Beck asked for clarification on the retention ponds. Tyler responded that the ponds are owned by Coors Brewery, have fairly good security around them and that the ground survey has provided information that they are safe to build around. CM Weaver asked about the trail head and art projects, if it changes anything about the art or relocation of the trailhead. Scott Cutler and Ken Johnstone stated that nothing much has changed except it got moved a little to the north. CM Hultin asked about the total acreage. Mr. Cutler and Tyler responded that its 13 acres to be developed with around 108 acres in total where there will need to be further construction for Clear Creek Drive. CM Dozeman asked about the timeline to build-out. Tyler responded to get permits in place and start construction in March of next year to start leasing in the fall. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by CM Stites to approve Council Bill 21-2021 – An Ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at approximately 4051 Clear Creek Drive from Planned Commercial Development (PCD) to Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD) on second reading, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication, for the following reasons: City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 6 1. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the rezoning after conducting a proper public hearing. 2. The proposed rezoning has been reviewed by the Community Development Department which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The proposed rezoning has been found to comply with the criteria for review in Section 26-303.D of the Code of Laws. Seconded by CM Hoppe; motion carries 8-0 3. Council Bill No. 22-2021 - An Ordinance approving the disposition of park land at Stites Park and in connection therewith authorizing an exchange of land to correct the property boundary CM Hutchinson introduced Council Bill 22-2021 Issue Stites Park is located at the northwest corner of W. 29th Avenue and Newland Street. At the north side of the park, the playground and basketball court were constructed by the City over a 15-foot sliver of private property. At the west side of the park, the fence, constructed in partnership by the City and adjacent property owner, is located several feet off the property line and into the City-owned park. Approval of this ordinance will facilitate a land exchange between the City and the adjacent property owner to correct these discrepancies. Because this exchange involves park land, unanimous approval by the entire Council is required for the ordinance. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. The Mayor reviewed the procedures. No citizens appeared in chambers to address this issue. There were none who wanted to speak through the Zoom format. Deputy City Clerk Eaton assigned Ordinance No. 1728 Staff Presentation Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager presented that the property at 6675 W. 29th Avenue is an oversized lot in the Residential-Two (R-2) zone district. In 2017, the private property was purchased by a partnership. The property previously contained a single- family home which was removed from the site through a demolition permit issued in November 2017. The owner at the time explored the possibility of a subdivision. They also worked with the City’s Parks and Recreation Department to replace the chain link fence separating the park and private property. The chain link fence was located several feet into the park because of the location of several mature trees. In an effort to retain the trees, the upgraded fence was installed in the same location in 2018. The ownership that completed this work subsequently dissolved, and no formal subdivision application was submitted. City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 7 The current owner of the property was in communication with the Community Development staff in early 2020 to discuss the possibility of development under the existing residential zoning and to discuss the possibility of a land exchange in association with a subdivision plat. The land exchange corrects two issues: • At the north side of the park, the playground and basketball court were constructed over a 15-foot sliver of private property. This portion is 3,671 square feet in size and through the land exchange would be deeded to the City. • At the west side of the park, the fence is located several feet off the property line and into the park. This portion varies in width and is 1,485 square feet in size and through the land exchange would be deeded from the City to the adjacent owner. While the exchange results in a net increase for the park, the disposition of the western sliver is still considered to be disposal of parkland and therefore is required to be reviewed pursuant to Section 16.5 of the Wheat Ridge Charter. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions and comments CM Hoppe asked whether any compensation to the current property owner would be paid. Ms. Mikulak replied no but the owner has expressed no objections. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by CM Hutchinson to approve Council Bill 22-2021 – An Ordinance approving the disposition of park land at Stites Park and in connection therewith authorizing an exchange of land to correct the property boundary on second reading, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by CM Hoppe; motion carries 8-0 4. Council Bill No. 23-2021 - An Ordinance approving the transfer of 4100 Gray Street through General Warranty Deed to the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, in order to place a reverter on the property and return ownership to the City of Wheat Ridge through a Commissioner’s Deed. Discussion began at approximately 7:58 pm CM Hultin introduced Council Bill 23-2021 Issue Following Council approval, the City of Wheat Ridge recently purchased a home at 4100 Gray Street for $525,000, with the intent to expand the adjacent Randall Park. Staff worked with Jefferson County Open Space to seek a Land Conservation Partnership Grant in the amount of $150,000 to assist in the purchase. As a City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 8 requirement for Open Space funding, the property must be made subject to a reverter clause. The formal process requires the City of Wheat Ridge to transfer the property to Jefferson County through a General Warranty Deed. Once received, Jefferson County will return ownership to the City of Wheat Ridge through a Commissioner’s Deed, imposing the reverter clause requiring that the property be used for public open space, park or recreational purposes in perpetuity. Pursuant to the Wheat Ridge City Charter Section 16.5, the unanimous approval of the entire City Council, by ordinance, is necessary to sell or dispose of designated park land. While the transfer to Jefferson County is not a final disposal, the Charter requirement must be followed. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. The Mayor reviewed the procedures. No citizens appeared in chambers to address this issue. There were none who wanted to speak through the Zoom format. Deputy City Clerk Eaton assigned Ordinance No. 1729 Staff Presentation Karen A. O’Donnell, Director of Parks & Recreation presented briefly that it is just a formal to accept that There is intent of construction of a community garden would address equity issues as the City currently houses only one community garden several miles away. It would also help to bolster the current initiative for the increase in sustainable agriculture and food security for the Wheat Ridge community. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions and comments There were none. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by CM Hultin to approve Council Bill 23-2021 – An Ordinance approving the transfer of 4100 Gray Street through General Warranty Deed to the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, in order to place a reverter on the property and return ownership to the City of Wheat Ridge through a Commissioner’s Deed, on second reading, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by CM Stites. Discussion by CM Hultin and CM Hutchinson, thanked staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission for their work on this item. Motion carried 8-0, unanimous approval as required by the City Charter and Code. City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 9 ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING 5. Council Bill No. 24-2021 - An Ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 12100 W. 44th Avenue from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use- Commercial (MU-C) CM Nosler Beck introduced Council Bill 24-2021. ISSUE The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) for property located at 12100 W. 44th Avenue. The zone change is compatible with the area and will allow a wider range of potential land uses in the future, including residential workforce housing. Motion by CM Nosler Beck to approve Council Bill No. 24-2021 - an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 12100 W. 44th Avenue from Commercial- One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C), on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, January 10, 2022 at 7:00 p.m. as a virtual meeting and in City Council Chambers if allowed to meet in person on that date per COVID-19 restrictions, and that it take effect 15 days after final publication, seconded by CM Dozeman; motion carried 8-0. DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS 6. Resolution No. 58-2021, A Resolution approving the amended and restated intergovernmental agreement concerning animal sheltering, dog licensing and funding of the Foothills Animal Shelter. CM Dozeman introduced Resolution No. 58-2021. Issue The Foothills Animal Shelter Board of Directors has recognized a need to update the Intergovernmental Agreement between Jefferson County and the cities therein to revise the funding model and assessment calculation, update compliance requirements, remove outdated language, and update the timing of budget recommendations. Staff Presentation Mr. Goff gave brief explanatory comments. Public Comment No one came forward to speak on this item. Council Questions None expressed. Motion by CM Dozeman to approve Resolution No.58-2021, a resolution approving the amended and restated intergovernmental agreement concerning animal sheltering, dog City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 10 licensing and funding of the Foothills Animal Shelter, seconded by CM Stites; motion carried 8-0. 7. Resolution No. 59-2021, A resolution approving an agreement with the Mile High Flood District and the City of Lakewood regarding funding of Major Drainageway Planning and Flood Hazard Area Delineation for Lena Gulch and Tributary H CM Weaver introduced Resolution No. 59-2021. Issue The floodplain maps and master plan for Lena Gulch need to be updated to incorporate new regulatory flows that are currently being finalized by the Mile High Flood District (MHFD). An Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with MHFD and the City of Lakewood needs to be executed to allow MHFD to complete the updates. Staff Presentation Mark Westberg was available for comment. Public Comment No one came forward to speak on this item. Council Questions None were expressed. Motion by CM Weaver to approve Resolution No. 59-2021, a resolution approving an agreement with the Mile High Flood District and the City of Lakewood regarding funding of Major Drainageway Planning and Flood Hazard Area Delineation for Lena Gulch and Tributary H, seconded by CM Stites. CM Weaver thanked those who worked to recognize Lena Gulch as a major floodplain and valuable open space. Motion carried 8-0. CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS Mr. Goff wanted to thank Council for recognizing the new Wheat Ridge Police Officers and the 2021 Class of Wheat Ridge 101. He thanked Marianne Schilling for her excellent work on WR 101. He also expressed his hopes for a great Holiday season. CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS Nothing tonight. ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS CM Hutchinson congratulated Wheat Ridge 101 graduates and welcomed our new WR Police Officers. She acknowledged her sadness over such a devastating week of City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 11 natural disasters in six states along the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers. Our thoughts and prayers go out to those people affected by these natural disasters. CM Nosler Beck wanted to apologize for her late arrival, explaining that she had an obligation with one of her two young daughters. She also wished everyone a healthy, happy and safe Holiday season. CM Ohm thanked the staff members who met with him and CM Hultin this week to discuss the Wadsworth project. He reminded us that there is still an open seat on the Planning Commission to represent District II. He wished everyone a safe and healthy Holiday season. CM Dozeman wished everyone a happy Holiday season, Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah. She profusely thanked the staff for their excellent service to our community. CM Weaver how early it is getting dark and 38th is very dangerous, be aware of pedestrians and bicyclists. Take precautions like dressing in light clothing and taking extra care. CM Stites gave kudos to staff and to not only our new PO Recruits but all of our Police Department for creating and maintaining a great culture. Thanks everyone in WR 101 for their interest and effort. Everyone have Merry Christmas, and remember during your Holiday shopping, if you can find it in Wheat Ridge, buy it in Wheat Ridge and support our local merchants. CM Hoppe wishes everyone a safe, warm Holiday season for your family. She expressed her excitement for 6 new recruits now serving our residents on the streets and also thanked the WR 101 class for their interest, commitments and efforts. CM Hultin repeated her peers sentiments about our new Police Officers and WR 101 grads. She is ever grateful that we live in a community of hearts, shining bright, of our diversity, how fortunate we all are to live in a City like Wheat Ridge. CM Ohm and I understand that we will need to be even more proactive working on the Wadsworth project as it rolls out. Foresight and planning by staff have been outstanding; they have a plan for all contingencies and exigencies. Know that CM Ohm and I will be here working for all of our residents during the several years that this project will require. Forget ordering online; walk down the street and patronize our local businesses. Our trees all need a serious watering given the current and recent drought conditions. Mayor Starker congratulated the WR 101 graduates and hopes to see their continued involvement and service to our City. He thanked Tyler Carlson and the folks at Evergreen Development for their continued involvement in Clear Creek and for bringing the City a check for almost $10 million. He is buoyed by new group of police recruits, who are a great group of new servants to our residents. He also thanked the people who attended Coffee with the Mayor to discuss local issues including homelessness and other issues we face. School is out, please be careful as the kids will be out on our streets and in our parks. When and if we ever get some snow, be ready to grab a shovel and help our neighbors who need assistance clearing the driveways, walkways and sidewalks. We will see everyone in the New Year. City Council Minutes December 13, 2021 page 12 ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 8:18 pm. _____________________________ Robin Eaton, Deputy City Clerk APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 14, 2022. ______________________________ Rachel Hultin, Mayor Pro Tem The preceding Minutes were prepared according to §47 of Robert’s Rules of Order, i.e., they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD’s of the meetings are available for listening or viewing by contacting the City Clerk’s Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions City Council Meeting Minutes CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING January 10, 2022 Note: This meeting was conducted both as a virtual meeting and hybrid, where some members of the Council or City staff were physically present at the Municipal building, and some members of the public attended in person as well. All eight members of Council were present in Council Chambers for this session. Before calling the meeting to order, Mayor Starker stated the rules and procedures necessitated by this meeting format. Mayor Starker called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Judy Hutchinson Scott Ohm Rachel Hultin Janeece Hoppe Amanda Weaver Korey Stites Leah Dozeman CM Nosler Beck excused herself. Also, present: City Clerk, Steve Kirkpatrick; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; City Manager, Patrick Goff; City Treasurer, Chris Miller; Administrative Services Director, Allison Scheck; Police Chief, Chris Murtha; Police Division Chief Jim Lorentz; Director of Parks and Recreation, Karen O’Donnell; Assistant to the City Manager, Marianne Schilling; Lauren Mikulak, other staff, guests and interested citizens. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Nothing for tonight’s meeting. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CM Hultin asked that item 1a be separated from the other items in the Consent Agenda for a separate deliberation. Otherwise, without objection or correction, the agenda stood as announced. PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES This item began at 7:03 PM. National Radon Action Month (NRAM) Mayor Starker supports the NRAM program, along with other cities, counties, and states across the United States. Testing for radon is easy, inexpensive and would have a major impact in preventing radon cancers and deaths. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 2 Colorado Parks & Recreation Association Awards presentations. Karen O’Donnell announced the awards presented recently to Beth June of Wheat Ridge’s Parks and Recreation staff and to Local Works for their work. National Law Enforcement Appreciation Day – The Mayor read the proclamation in support and appreciation of our Wheat Ridge Police Department, both sworn offices and civilian staff. The Mayor presented the Proclamation to Cpl. Molly Stark of the WRPD. He recounted the sacrifices and losses police officers in the Metro area during the past year. PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO SPEAK Danny Terlip came to raise awareness of waste management in the City. The quality of services currently offered does not meet the needs of the residents. Wheat Ridge residents must contract for their own waste services with several different vendors. This not only creates more traffic and pollution, along with safety issues, but also creates a widely varying service cost and quality. April Novak, 2995 Ingalls St. Also came to address the question of refuse removal. She cited examples of inadequate services, public health issues and the dangers of having so many waste trucks in the City. We need citywide refuse removal, yard waste removal and recycling by all trash haulers. The current situation is unsafe, too expensive and needs attention from Council. Note about Wheat Ridge Speaks: Members of the Public may visit the Wheat Ridge Speaks website and enter written comments of up to 1,000 words on any Council agenda item. The deadline for citizens to submit comments is 12:00 Noon Mountain Time on the day of a Council session so that Council members, other elected officials and City Staff have time to review the comments before the meeting on Monday evening. The City Clerk’s Office transcribes those Wheat Ridge Speaks comments into these minutes, placing each comment along with the record for that agenda item, including items that address a public hearing (verbatim, if the comments do not contain lascivious language or unlawful hate speech). The following comment related to agenda item 6 was posted: I live on the corner of 52nd and Tabor (5210 Tabor) and was not provided a notice of this meeting and I only have 15 minutes to give feedback. We are directly impacted by the work and changes and I was under the impression that all homes were notified that were adjacent to the work. Was the other home in Rainbow Ridge notified? January 10, 2022, 11:46 AM Patty Davies 5210 Tabor Street, Arvada, 80002 City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 3 1. CONSENT AGENDA Discussion began at approximately 7:15 PM CM Hoppe introduced the consent agenda. a. Resolution No. 01-2022 – a resolution designating the municipal building main entrance display cabinet as the official public notice posting location and the Jeffco Transcript as the official newspaper of general circulation for the city publications in 2022. Issue State statutes require that each municipality annually establish the location for posting public notices, as well as the newspaper in which the notices will be published. Local government entities are also allowed to publish notices on-line for public meetings. These include meetings at which the adoption of any proposed policy, position, resolution, rule, regulation, or formal action occurs or at which a majority or quorum of body is in attendance CM Dozeman asked whether the Gazette might be used as the publication for public notices. A detailed discussion ensued, which considered a number of options Mr. Dahl explained to Council its options for designating the official public notice newspaper. He advised that we not take action tonight without further research into both the Statute and publication options. CM Hutchinson commented that we have too many residents who do not have computers or smart devices. Many of our residents need and want to read information in the newspaper. CM Hoppe suggested that we delay any action. Mr. Goff urged Council to pass the current resolution and then reconsider it later. On Motion by CM Hoppe, seconded by CM Stites, item 1 a) passed 7-0. b. Motion to approve quarterly payments to the Jefferson County Communications Authority for E-911 call-taking and police radio dispatch services not to exceed $645,743 for 2022 Issue The Police Department is requesting authorization of payment to the Jefferson County Communications Authority (Jeffcom) in the amount of $645,743, to be paid in quarterly amounts. This amount is the City’s 2022 share of costs for the regional call-taking and dispatch center for police and fire agencies in Jefferson County. c. Motion to approve payment to Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) for 2022 property/casualty premium in the amount of $345,569.17 City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 4 Issue The Colorado Intergovernmental Risk Sharing Agency (CIRSA) provides property/casualty coverage for the City of Wheat Ridge. The annual payment due for 2022 is $345,569.17 d. Motion to approve payment to Pinnacol Assurance for the 2022 workers compensation premium in the amount of $282,202 Issue As approved in the 2022 budget, Pinnacol Assurance provides workers compensation insurance for the City of Wheat Ridge. The annual estimated premium due for 2022 is $282,202. e. Motion to appoint Wanda Sang and Sunny Garcia to the Election Commission Issue The two positions on the Election Commission are due for appointment. Wanda Sang and Sunny Garcia currently serve on the Election Commission and both have reapplied. Both individuals meet the qualifications to serve, and both have extensive knowledge and experience with elections. f. Motion to appoint Kathy Plummer and Lindsay Burney to the Cultural Commission to fill vacancies, terms ending March 2, 2023 Issue Due to the resignations of Shawna Black and Lisa Streisfeld, the District III and IV seats on the Cultural Commission are vacant. The terms of these positions expire on March 2, 2023 Motion by CM Hoppe to approve Consent Agenda Items b.), c.), d.), e.), and f.) Seconded by CM Stites , motion carried 7-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING Discussion began at approximately 7:39 PM 2. Council Bill No. 24-2021 - An Ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 12100 W. 44th avenue from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use- Commercial (MU-C) (Case No. WZ-21-10) CM Dozeman introduced Council Bill 24-2021. Issue The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) for property located at 12100 W. 44th Avenue. The zone City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 5 change is compatible with the area and will allow a wider range of potential land uses in the future, including residential workforce housing. Mayor Starker opened the public hearing. The Mayor reviewed the procedures. No citizens appeared in chambers to address this issue. There were none who wanted to speak through the Zoom format. City Clerk Steve Kirkpatrick assigned Ordinance No. 1730 Staff Presentation Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner spoke to the council on the issue, where the property is located on the southeast corner of Van Gordon Street and W. 44th Avenue. W. 44th Avenue is one of Wheat Ridge’s main east-west arterials, with the 44th Avenue Subarea Plan process slated to move forward in 2022. The I-70 interstate is nearby to the north. There is currently one access point into the site off W. 44th Avenue and two access points off Van Gordon Street. The property is currently zoned Commercial-One (C-1). According to the Jefferson County Assessor, the property consists of 4 lots totaling 125,264 square feet (2.876 acres) in size, and it contains the Howard Johnson hotel built in 1985 which is currently operating. There is a restaurant component located on the first floor of the hotel that is currently vacant. The properties along this portion of W. 44th Avenue are in commercial, mixed-use, residential, and agricultural zone districts, and primarily contain commercial uses including a truck stop across the street to the north. Tabor Lake borders the site to the south. The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned to MU-C, a zone district intended for major commercial corridors and at community and employment activity centers. It encourages medium- to high-density mixed-use development. In addition to residential and civic uses, it allows for a range of commercial and retail uses. The applicant has proposed to rezone the property to convert the existing 108-room hotel and restaurant into approximately 100 residential apartments. The project aims to generate workforce housing to serve the Wheat Ridge area. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions and comments CM Hutchinson asked Ms. Stephens to comment on the economics of the proposed housing, how it will be priced and income levels likely to qualify. Stewart Sloat,2211 N. Broom St. Colorado Springs, one of the applicants for the zoning change responded in detail to CM Hutchinson’s question. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 6 Mark Nemger, Plan Mark Design LLC, Project Architect for the applicant responded to several of Council’s detailed questions concerning rights of way, tree preservation and similar matters. CM Weaver ask if there is a way to ensure that the residents who will live in the residences are or are not able to pay the prevailing market rates for the same residences. The applicant gave a detailed answer. The Mayor asked whether the commercial tenant spaces have been leased. The applicant gave a detailed answer. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by CM Dozeman to approve Council Bill No. 24-2021 - an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 12100 W. 44th Avenue from Commercial-One (C-1) to Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) on second reading, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication, for the following reasons: 1. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the rezoning after conducting a proper public hearing. 2. The proposed rezoning has been reviewed by the Community Development Department, which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The proposed rezoning has been found to comply with the criteria for review in Section 26-603 of the Code of Laws. Seconded by CM Hoppe, motion carried 7-0 CM Hultin commented on how badly needed this kind of residential property is in Wheat Ridge. CM Dozeman also endorsed the plans for this project. CM Hoppe commented that this project addresses needs of those who fall into the gap between affordable and market rate housing. 3. Resolution No.02-2022 – A Resolution approving a major subdivision at 4000- 4066 Upham Street in the Residential-Three (R-3) zone district (Case No. WS- 21-06 / Ridgetop Village Plat) CM Hultin introduced Resolution No. 02-2022 at 7:50 pm. Issue The applicant is requesting approval of a major subdivision on property located at 4000- 4066 Upham Street. The purpose of the request is to subdivide the property into 22 lots, plus four tracts. The plat is required to allow each dwelling in the development to be owned separately, to establish common area tracts, and to establish the necessary utility and access easements. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 7 Mayor Starker opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. Staff Presentation Scott Cutler, Senior Planner reprised the item that was held during a Planning Commission meeting, at which the Commission approved a Planned Building Group (PBG) site plan for the property at the hearing on December 16, 2021. The approved PBG includes specific site details including site design, landscaping, architecture, parking, and lighting. City Code requires the Planning Commission to review the PBG at one public hearing, and their decision is final. City Council is required by code to review any major subdivision application but does not review the site plan application or other site details such as construction documents. He detailed how the site is located on the east side of Upham Street, midway between W. 38th Avenue and W. 44th Avenue and is 82,849 square feet (1.9 acres) in size. It contains four (4) lots with one single-family home each. The existing homes were built in the 1920s-1950s and are in average/fair condition per the Jefferson County Assessor. The lots are double depth (a full city block deep) and approximately ½ acre each, which is oversized for the area. New development on the site is required to comply with the R-3 development standards including setbacks/build-to, building height, architecture/materials, open space, parking, and lighting. The applicant is proposing to develop the site under the existing standards in R-3 and all proposed building forms, setbacks, and heights are permitted by the R-3 zoning. The permitted density calculation in the R-3 zone district is one (1) dwelling unit for every 3,630 square feet of land area, which equals 12 units per acre. Given a net lot size (gross acreage minus required right-of-way dedication) of 80,029 square feet (1.8372 acres), the property is eligible for 22 residential dwelling units. Public Comment Rolly Sorrentino, 4175 Teller St. came to ask Council to reconsider this proposed resolution given the recent conflagration that destroyed the town of Superior and much of Louisville. Are these residences protected by sprinkler systems? Is there adequate parking for the proposed number of residences? How will large trucks make deliveries? What about emergency vehicles and fire trucks? This project has too little green space at a time when we need more. This development needs to be reconsidered before it is approved, especially because of parking along Upham St. Council Questions and comments CM Hoppe asked about the details of the school district’s approval. Specifically, she asked whether the drainage issues were adequately addressed. Staff gave a detailed reply. Matt Hill, 5000 Quitman St., Denver, an applicant, addressed the question. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 8 CM Ohm asked if there is any filtration or mitigation of runoff from the nearby area. Again, Mr. Hill gave a detailed answer. CM Stites asked about garages. The applicant responded that there are 2 garage parking spaces for every unit. CM Hultin asked about the reasons why this project has come to Council for approval. Mr. Cutler gave a detailed answer. CM Hultin commented about the availability of both garage parking and driveway parking. She also asked about whether the plan meets the requirement for green space and trees. Again, Mr. Cutler gave a detailed answer. CM Hoppe asked about the units facing Upham and the adequacy of setbacks. Mr. Cutler answered in detail. CM Hoppe then asked Mr. Dahl whether this subdivision plat meets all the legal requirements. Mr. Dahl replied in the affirmative in detail. CM Weaver asked whether West Metro Fire had seen and approved this subdivision plan. Mr. Cutler replied in the affirmative. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing. Motion by CM Hultin to approve Resolution No. 02-2022 – A Resolution approving a major subdivision at 4000-4066 Upham Street in the Residential-Three (R-3) zone district for the following reasons: 1. City Council has conducted a proper public hearing that meets all public notice requirements as required by Section 26-109 and 26-407 of the Code of Laws. 2. The requested subdivision has been reviewed by the Planning Commission, which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The subdivision plat has been found in compliance with Article IV of Chapter 26 of the Code of Laws. 4. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the developer’s expense. and with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall pay the required fees-in-lieu of parkland dedication at time of building permit. 2. The developer shall enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and a Lot Sale Restriction Covenant Agreement with the City at the time of recordation of the subdivision plat. Seconded by CM Dozeman, motion carried 7-0. CM Hoppe commented that we are taking an action that meets community needs. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 9 CM Ohm echoed those comments. ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING 4. Council Bill No. 01-2022 – An Ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) (Case No. WZ-21-12) CM Weaver introduced Council Bill 01-2022 at 8:20 pm. Issue The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) for property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue. The zone change retains the single-family character of the neighborhood and could allow the oversized subject property to accommodate two single-family homes in the future. Motion by CM Weaver to approve Council Bill 01-2022- an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) on first reading, order it published, public hearing set for Monday, February 14, 2022 at 7 p.m. as a virtual meeting and in City Council Chambers if allowed to meet in person on that date per COVID-19 restrictions, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication; seconded by CM Hoppe; carried 7-0. DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS Discussion began at approximately 8:22 PM 5. Resolution No. 03-2022 - A Resolution recognizing historical assets on the Lutheran Legacy Campus and supporting a good faith effort to preserve, rehabilitate and/or reuse the Blue House, Tucker Tent, and the Chapel of the Good Samaritan CM Stites introduced the Resolution. Issue On October 25, 2021 City Council adopted the Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan. During the public hearing, a City Council consensus motion was made to move forward a resolution recognizing the public’s interest in retaining the Blue House, Chapel and tuberculosis tent. Staff Presentation Mr. Johnstone spoke on how the public feedback received during the Lutheran Legacy Campus Master Plan was wide-ranging and sometimes divergent, but the community found common ground with a shared interest in some of the older structures on the site. Many individuals expressed a strong desire to retain the three structures which have historical value: The Blue House, the Chapel of the Good Samaritan, and the Tucker Tent. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 10 The Blue House is a two-story farmhouse with a basement which dates to 1902 and is the oldest permanent structure on the property. It is located adjacent to 38th Avenue and in its early years served as the administrative offices and hospital ward for the tuberculosis sanitarium that surrounded the house. In 1921, it was repurposed as an office and lab as well as a dormitory for nurses. In the early 1980s it functioned as a thrift store, and from 1985 until 1997, the Lutheran Auxiliary operated a tearoom with lunch service. The Tucker Tent sits just south of the Blue House and is a relic of the tuberculosis sanitarium. It features wood and canvas walls with a shingled roof. From 1905 to 1921, the Lutheran Sanitarium relied on Tucker Tents to house and treat tuberculosis patients; the sanitarium started with 15 tents and grew to 29. The tents were decommissioned in 1921 when they were replaced with a more permanent facility. The three structures are all privately owned, and none are listed on the register of historic places. The intent of this resolution is to recognize the public interest in these structures and to urge future buyers of the property to make a good faith effort to explore preservation, rehabilitation, and/or reuse of the structures. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions CM Hultin asked if this resolution passes how will it impact the discussions with the City Planners and the Planning Commission. Mr. Johnstone gave a detailed reply. CM Dozeman asked whether the historic structures addressed in this measure might be moved/relocated? She wants staff to look at the feasibility of moving the structures and still preserving them. CM Hoppe asked whether the City owns any of these properties; Mr. Goff replied no. CM Hoppe also thanked the staff for all of their hard work on this measure. Motion by CM Stites to approve Resolution No. 03-2022, a resolution recognizing historical assets on the Lutheran Legacy Campus and supporting a good faith effort to preserve, rehabilitate and/or reuse the Blue House, Tucker Tent, and the Chapel of the Good Samaritan, seconded by CM Dozeman, motion carried 7-0. 6. Resolution No. 04-2022 - A Resolution establishing the street width for 52nd Avenue from Ward Road to Tabor Street, for Tabor Street from 52nd Avenue to Ridge Road, and for Ridge Road from Tabor Street to the city boundary east of Simms Place CM Dozeman introduced the Resolution at 8:40 pm. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 11 Issue The street widths for 52nd Avenue, Tabor Street and Ridge Road were designated by Council on February 25, 2019, but construction didn’t start within one year, so the street width designations must be reapproved by Council in accordance with Section 5.20 of the City Charter. Staff Presentation Mark Westberg, Project Supervisor described how council must designate the new width of the street in accordance with Section 5.20 of the City Charter. After the street width was designated, the preparation of the construction plans continued until Fall 2020, when the decision was made to annex the portions of the 52nd Avenue ROW that were within Jefferson County. After the annexation process was completed, the construction plans were finalized and advertised for bids in March 2020, just as COVID was starting to impact the area. Largely due to COVID impacts, the bids were cancelled in late April 2020 and work on the Ward TOD projects was suspended. Subsequently, the remaining funding for the Ward TOD projects was transferred to Clear Creek Crossing to help complete the I-70 ramp project. In early 2021, the City of Arvada expressed a desire to restart the Streets projects due to the large amount of development that was occurring in both cities in the nearby area. Using funding from Arvada’s reimbursement for the design and ROW work completed prior suspending the projects, updating the construction plans for the Streets projects was started in June 2021. The construction plans needed to be updated due all the work that was completed by adjacent private development. Public Comment Dennis Hatfield came to address this proposal about 52nd Ave., where he lives. No one has given us definitive information on where this change will impact his property. He is concerned about fencing in place that may have to be removed. How much of our property will the City take? We have sprinkler systems, fruit trees and other improvements on this land. He recounted promises made by Council in the past, which have not been fulfilled. Please, let us know how much of our property you plan to take and whether we will be compensated for it. We feel we are in the dark. He urged Council to shelve this proposal tonight until the residents understand the full impacts. Kimberley Reed, 5170 Tabor St. The resident came to protest the broken promises, water damage and lack addressing of residents’ concerns. Her well has begun to drop, and she is afraid that her well water will dry up like her neighbors. Please, answer our questions. Tess Tari, 5110 Swadley St., called to ask how the City can do all of the improvements, including sidewalks, gutters and storm drains, without taking private property in the process. She is very frustrated with this project and the lack of response to residents. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 12 Council Questions CM Hoppe asked whether the residents could protest after this evening. Mr. Dahl opined as to what procedures Charter requires for a protest. She then asked what has changed since Council considered this issue and passed a resolution two years ago. Mr. Westberg gave a detailed answer. He also replied that the City is building all improvements on City property. The Mayor asked Mr. Westberg to respond to Ms. Tari’s comments on building on private vs. public right of way. CM Dozeman asked whether the City would defray the cost of moving any fences along the edge of rights of way. Mr. Westberg replied that the City will defray those costs. Mr. Westberg offered to hold a meeting with the residents in the area to respond to their questions and concerns. CM Hutchinson commented that many of our residents live in properties that pre-date Wheat Ridge as an incorporated City. We need to address the issues people living in those older homes face today based on how the City is proceeding on all projects like this one. Mr. Goff asked Mr. Westberg to reply to CM Hutchinson’s concerns. CM Weaver expressed her empathy for impacts on private property, the reality is that we cannot go back and undo what has been done. Motion by CM Dozeman to approve Resolution No. 04-2022, a resolution establishing street widths for 52nd Avenue from Ward Road to Tabor Street, for Tabor Street from 52nd Avenue to Ridge Road, and for Ridge Road from Tabor Street to the City boundary east of Simms Street., seconded by CM Hoppe, motion carried 6-1, with CM Hutchinson voting nay. 7. Resolution No. 05-2022 - A Resolution approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of Wheat Ridge and the Jefferson Center for Mental Health for mental health co-responder services CM Hutchinson introduced the Resolution at 9:10 pm. Issue The Wheat Ridge Police Department and the Jefferson Center for Mental Health (JCMH) have developed a Mental Health Co-Responder Program to provide the community with a mental health case manager clinician to consult with the City’s police department, to act and follow up on referrals from the police, and ride with patrol officers on duty to provide services to persons in the community that are experiencing mental health crisis or substance use problems. The program is described in a Memorandum of Understanding. This Resolution approves that memorandum. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 13 Staff Presentation Chris Murtha, WR Police Chief, spoke briefly where the Wheat Ridge Police Department began developing a Case Manager Co-Responder Program which became operational September of 2019. This was a shared program with the Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office, Golden Police Department, and Wheat Ridge Police Department in partnership with Jefferson Center for Mental Health through a DOLA grant. That grant ended in July 2021, and the City chose to continue to pay a portion of the cost to continue the program through December of 2021. Mental health emergencies and assistance are high priorities for the City of Wheat Ridge. Recognizing the importance and value of the program, the City has developed a Memorandum of Understanding to continue the program with a full-time mental health clinician from JCMH with the City. A written agreement for services provided between the City and JCMH has been developed and includes: a. a statement of the specific services to be provided. b. specific language dealing with financial agreements between the parties. c. specification of the records to be maintained concerning the performance of services by the provider agency. d. language dealing with the duration, modification, and termination of the contract. e. specific language dealing with legal contingencies. f. stipulation that the provider agency maintains control over its personnel. g. specific arrangements for the use of equipment and facilities; and h. a procedure for review and revision, if needed, of the agreement. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions CM Hutchinson asked for follow-up on how well this service is working. Chief Murtha gave a detailed reply. Chief Lorenz has the data and will provide it to Council soon. CM Hoppe commented that this program has been successful enough to encourage expansion the program, and we should move forward tonight. Motion by CM Hutchinson to approve Resolution No. 05-2022, a resolution approving a memorandum of understanding between the City of Wheat Ridge and the Jefferson Center for Mental Health for Co-Responder services, seconded by CM Stites, motion carried 7-0. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 14 8. Motion to award a contract and approve subsequent payments of $90,400 to Berry Dunn for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) consultant services CM Ohm introduced the Motion at 9:19 pm. Issue At City Council’s direction, staff has completed a competitive bidding process to select a consultant to analyze business practices and assist with the procurement of a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system. The procurement process is complete, and Berry Dunn is the recommended consultant based on expertise, experience, and cost. Staff Presentation Whitney Mugford-Smith, Procurement Manager provided data on this issue, that was presented by Ms. Scheck, who explained that the ERP analysis was approved in the 2020 budget but placed on hold due to the pandemic City Council approved a budget supplemental request for $100,000 on June 14, 2021 to fund the ERP analysis. Berry Dunn’s proposal includes a not-to-exceed fee of $90,400 which includes the base proposal fee of $84,900 plus travel incidental costs. Funding will be encumbered on a purchase order using 2021 funds. An Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system is an integrated suite of business applications including financial software, sales and use tax remittance system, procurement program and personnel management programs that are used to power an organization. In Wheat Ridge, the building permitting, and court management programs are part of the ERP. The City currently uses the American Data Group (ADG) solution which is a legacy system that has served the City well for a number of years. ADG’s clients are typically very small organizations, and the product is not considered a mainstream offering in the ERP field. While functional, the system is not considered user friendly by customers nor staff and it is likely that Wheat Ridge has outgrown this solution Berry Dunn possesses extensive experience with this kind of project, listing a number of municipalities, similar in size and scope to Wheat Ridge, as clients for similar projects. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions None, since Council was already well acquainted with this matter. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 15 Motion by CM Ohm to award a contract and approve subsequent payments to Berry Dunn in the amount of $90,400 for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) consulting services, seconded by CM , motion carried 8-0. Mayor Starker closed the public hearing CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS Mr. Goff announced that Legal Pete’s and a new Tavern have signed leases at Golds Marketplace. There will also be a new restaurant coming to the City soon and the identity of that business has to remain confidential at present. He also alerted Council to the beginning of the bidding process to assess the adequacy of City Hall for our staff and the public. In the meantime, an office space has come available, and the City is looking into the possibility of leasing that space. He will come to Council soon with more details and a proposed lease. CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS Nothing tonight. ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS CM Dozeman announced that the Wheat Ridge Grange is having their Annual Red and Green Chili dinner on Thursday, January 27th. Sign-up ends on January 17. CM Ohm thanked Vinola’s Bakery and Restaurant, for their excellent food and service for so many years. He commented on traffic flow during the Wadsworth expansion project and citizens comments he has heard. His experience has not been bad so far. He also noticed that speed alert machines are appearing in his neighborhood. CM Hutchinson commented on people who come to Council to make comments and who leave comments on WR Speaks. She believes she sees less attachment and participation by the public recently. CM Stites welcomed Illegal Pete’s to District III (Gold’s Marketplace). He also thanked those who helped their neighbors, especially the elderly, during the two recent snowstorms. He asked that businesses emphasize snow removal from the pavement in front of their businesses to help pedestrians and those with disabilities. If you can find it in Wheat Ridge, buy it in Wheat Ridge. CM Weaver thanked the City for such great snow removal. It’s Stock Show time, so please attend and support the Show as well as our agricultural industry. It’s a lot of fun! CM Hoppe asked if we are going to discuss going virtual for a while. CM Hultin asked that we consider going virtual for the one meeting remaining in January and for the month of February, returning to live sessions on March 7, 2022. A discussion followed CM Hultin’s proposal. City Council Minutes January 10, 2022 page 16 Council reached a consensus to meet virtually until March 7th. CM Hultin also recalled the comments about refuse removal tonight and will add that to a future Study Session agenda. CM Stites asked that regulations about how long trash may be left at the curb be included. CM Hultin reported that a relative is suffering from Stage 4 cancer caused by Radon. She encourages everyone to take advantage of radon testing, especially because radon is so prevalent in the Front Range including our City. The tests cost $17 and $27 for short-term and long-term tests, respectively. There is a new Indian cuisine restaurant, Barbari, that CM Hultin highly recommends. CM Nosler Beck asked that the Mayor read a eulogy for Coach Merl Shirley who was a coach and teacher at Wheat Ridge High School for more than 40 years. He touched the lives of the young adults he coached. He was an exemplary citizen and mentor to our young adults. He will be missed by so many, including the coaches who learned their sports and coaching under his tutelage. He included all of his players in his teams, Please, thank the coaches who you encounter today. Mayor Starker thanked those who attended the Coffee with the Mayor last Saturday. We would rather meet in person, but safety first. The Mayor proposed that CM Weaver be appointed to the Wheat Ridge Business District Board, along with the Mayor and CM Stites. Council approved by unanimous consensus. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:41 pm. _____________________________ Steve Kirkpatrick, City Clerk APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 14, 2022 ______________________________ Rachel Hultin, Mayor Pro Tem The preceding Minutes were prepared according to §47 of Robert’s Rules of Order, i.e., they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD’s of the meetings are available for listening or viewing by contacting the City Clerk’s Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions. City Council Meeting Minutes CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING January 24, 2022 Note: This meeting was held virtually, using Zoom video-teleconferencing technology. As duly announced and publicly noticed, Council previously approved this format in order to continue with normal business. Before calling the meeting to order, Mayor Starker stated the rules and procedures necessitated by this meeting format. Mayor Starker called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Judy Hutchinson Scott Ohm Rachel Hultin Janeece Hoppe Amanda Weaver Korey Stites Leah Dozeman Val Nosler Beck Also, present: City Clerk, Steve Kirkpatrick; City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; City Manager, Patrick Goff; City Treasurer, Chris Miller; Administrative Services Director, Allison Scheck; Police Chief, Chris Murtha; Police Division Chief Jim Lorentz; Director of Parks and Recreation, Karen O’Donnell; Assistant to the City Manager, Marianne Schilling; Lauren Mikulak, other staff, guests and interested citizens. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Without objection or correction, the City Council Minutes of November 8, 2021, November 22, 2021 and Study Session Notes of October 18, 2021 and November 14, 2021 were approved as published. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Without objection or correction, the agenda stood as announced. PROCLAMATIONS AND CEREMONIES This item began at 7:03 PM. Heart Healthy Month Mayor Starker welcomed Chelsea Kuznik, Lutheran Medical Center, who accepted the proclamation and discussed key steps and habits toward more heart health. The Mayor read the Proclamation and he also encouraged residents to adopt lifestyles and habits that promote heart health. He thanked Ms. Kuznik for her attendance and her work to promote public health generally and cardiac health in specific. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 2 City Clerk Note: To help the reader follow the Wheat Ridge Speaks and the Public’s Right to Speak comments herein below, note that a document in the Meeting Packet included some examples of housing projects, submitted by the Jeffco Public Housing Authority. Upon reading the packet, and social media, some residents inferred that Council was or would in the future consider these projects for approval. None of these projects exists, and there is no plan to develop them; there never was. They projects were fictitious examples only. Note about Wheat Ridge Speaks: Members of the Public may visit the Wheat Ridge Speaks website and enter written comments of up to 1,000 words on any Council agenda item. The deadline for citizens to submit comments is 12:00 Noon Mountain Time on the day of a Council session so that Council members, other elected officials and City Staff have time to review the comments before the meeting on Monday evening. The City Clerk’s Office transcribes those Wheat Ridge Speaks comments into these minutes, placing each comment along with the record for that agenda item, including items that address a public hearing (verbatim, if the comments do not contain lascivious language or unlawful hate speech). The following comments appeared in Wheat Ridge Speaks for this meeting. I am opposed. We bought our home in Wheat Ridge instead of Denver in part because it is still primarily single-family homes and community. Developers have not yet destroyed that by putting in an ugly 300-unit high-density housing into communities that cannot support them. This community cannot support the traffic and daily commutes, there are not enough schools, and there should be green space per family and adequate parking otherwise that traffic gets pushed into the lower density areas that were designed thoughtfully. Single family zoning is how the surrounding community is zoned. Don’t try and turn this suburban community into a city. January 24, 2022, 12:54 PM Sarah Healey 3375 Wright St Wheat Ridge, 80033 I am a Wheat Ridge citizen. I totally support the opportunity to have a lot more affordable housing in Wheat Ridge. There are so many people who work hard and support our community, but adequate housing is out of reach for many of them. I would like to see the people who live in this housing be workers in Wheat Ridge so that we will build our community and the residents will really care about the city in which they live. The western suburbs have a great dearth of affordable housing, especially for young working families. If we don't want to continue the trend of homeless people, we need to address their needs for housing that they can afford. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 3 January 23, 2022, 10:40 PM Deb Bollig 4786 Flower St Wheat Ridge, 80033 As a homeowner in Skyline Estates, I am very concerned about the density 300 units would strain the traffic. We simply do NOT have adequate street parking for such a project. I’m appalled with how much the City of Wheat Ridge is trying to obfuscate what this really is - government HUD housing dumped right in the middle of a subdivision of homes worth over $800,000. The misleading name of the meeting and the time of the “virtual” event makes it clear that the City is trying to disenfranchise the community and homeowners. No doubt this will lower the value of the nearby homes. I also have serious concerns about the Jefferson Residential Housing developers. They put up 400 units-not yet occupied in Golden with little to no parking available. The JRH is not a long-established developer and had bad ratings under their past business affiliation. January 22, 2022, 11:46 AM Sandy Nuyt 10523 54th Place Arvada, 80002 Hello, we live in a fairly new development to the west of one of the proposed low- income housing sites (site 2). We would like to state our concerns with the proposed project as there is already a low-income housing site near our location that brings a ton of crime to our neighborhood and the surrounding neighborhoods, which unfortunately we have experienced first-hand numerous times. Not to mention that with all of the new housing projects currently under way, there is not enough road infrastructure for all of the added traffic that the current and proposed new housing projects will add to the one lane roads surrounding this area. The low-income housing sites will reduce the property value of the neighborhoods surrounding and would include ours. This is a huge concern for us we paid a high market value price for our house and chose the location due to the surrounding amenities and neighborhoods that would keep our property value high. We think it is very important to have our opinions heard as we know that most of the families, we have talked to in our community strongly oppose this proposal. Please reconsider the location you are choosing to place this low-income housing project. Thank you. January 24, 2022, 12:29 PM Shilah Anderson 5212 Quail St Wheat Ridge, 80033 We are in sore need of affordable housing. I'm for it. HOWEVER, Jeffco, Arvada, and Wheat Ridge have done POOR job planning around the new transit hubs. Dense housing with no improvement to infrastructure shows a genuine lack of critical thinking. Ridge Road is a 2- land road with increasing traffic. The county and municipalities City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 4 should have included, at minimum, a third lane for left and right-hand turns. Better yet, it should have been widened to 4 lanes. Simply, the governments have shown little regard for the communities and residents and have displayed interest only in raising tax revenue. This area has quickly become just another unsightly piece of urban sprawl. January 24, 2022, 12:19 PM RANDY WEINERT 1088 W/54th Pl. Arvada, 80002 Hello, I live in a neighborhood west of this location and we are against this proposition. Ridge road cannot handle traffic to safely accommodate another 300 houses in addition to the houses already being built in the area. There is already a ton of crime and suspicious activity that happens in the area, which we have dealt with first had numerous of times, and I feel bringing more of this population would just add to the problem. Having low- income housing I also think would decrease the value of our home, which we paid top dollar for when we moved in. We chose this location for the amenities surrounding the area and the safety and don’t feel like this is going to be a good decision for the neighborhoods that surround this location. Thank you. January 24, 2022, 12:18 PM Shilah Anderson 5212 Quail St Wheat Ridge, 80033 We’ve lived in Skyline since the beginning, 2002, & were told there would be no building where there is building going on due 2 medical waste & the cost ink incurred from its removal but bottom line when it comes 2 $ u make your own rules & the fact that u were so deceptive in this project speaks volumes. We & the majority of r neighbors will do everything we can 2 oppose & stop what our trying 2 do. Honestly is there not a cap on the influx of people in such an already densely populated area?!?! We can’t accommodate what there is & u just keep adding & adding STOP!!!! January 24, 2022, 12:16 PM Ellisa Rupoli 11271w54th Ave. Arvada, 80002 I have been a resident of Wheat ridge for over 50 years and I’m proud of that. When I bought my home on Nelson Street in skyline, I thought it was going to be a safe home and community to raise my kids in and live there until I grew old. With this plan of affordable housing, I am afraid that will not be the case. We all know what will come of this community if this plan goes into effect. Please city council members think about if your house was this close to a plan like this. This is going to decrease the value of homes, and when the time comes for us to move out because we have had it with high crime and good knows what else this will bring, we will be selling our homes for pennies on the dollar because who else would want to move in next to a mess. Please City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 5 end this discussion once and for all so we here in skyline can stop worrying about it and enjoy what a beautiful community we have built in the last 17 years. Please be happy with what this area has become and find an area where it wouldn’t affect people this close to their homes. January 24, 2022, 12:02 PM Julie 5370 Nelson St Arvada, 80002 As a homeowner in the neighborhood of the site on 54th Avenue and Miler, I am very concerned about the impact that this housing plan will have on my neighborhood and my property value. The project being proposed backs up directly to the back fences of 10-12 current homes, including mine. The proposed lot is not large enough to adequately support the number of proposed units. The increase in traffic, as well as limited parking areas, will negatively impact the entire neighborhood. With the number of new homes, apartments, and townhouses that are currently being built in this area, has anyone created an impact report for the area schools if this new housing is built as well? The number of children that would most likely come into this area would overload Vanderhoof Elementary, the area home school, with the recent closing of Allendale Elementary. Overcrowded schools are unable to provide the education all of our students deserve. This proposed housing would negatively impact the students in the existing neighborhood as well as the students who would be moving into the new housing area. I have seen some of the comments supporting this proposal, and I agree that affordable housing is a concern, but building on this site will do more harm than good. January 24, 2022, 11:58 AM Kristine Sawyer 5386 Nelson St Arvada, 80002 This is in response to item #2 Affordable Housing - We have lived in Wheat Ridge for over 17 years. The amount of housing off of Ridge and Kipling that has been developed with apartment complexes has already created traffic problems in the area due to additional increase in residents. The lot East of Kipling between 44th & 48th is a complete eyesore with many homeless already living there. Why not use that lot instead for section 8 housing? It has ease of access, it is walking distance to transportation, jobs, and it is not located near high priced homes. Also, it is very disappointing that no notice was provided to the local residents regarding the development. Why the lack of transparency? Finally, when we purchased our homes, we had to sign a notice that we knew of the occupants of Ridge Home, being sexual deviants as determined by the state of Colorado. Does developing a Section 8 residential housing right next to this facility make any sense? Please take all of these suggestions and questions into consideration. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 6 January 24, 2022, 11:57 AM Chris Bradley 5323 Nelson St. Arvada, 80002 Against! With no one improving the infostructure to accommodate this huge flux of people and traffic, will cause many issues, not to mention safety for all the current residents and surrounding areas. It's a quiet and tranquil neighborhood, lots of walkers, dogs, children etc. Not conducive to adding these Huge numbers of folks and unbelievable amount of traffic etc. The decrease in our home values. This will be a huge impact! January 24, 2022, 11:48 AM Natalie Woodward 5369 Owens Street Arvada, 80002 Against! With no one improving the infostructure to accommodate this huge flux of people and traffic, will cause many issues, not to mention safety for all the current residents and surrounding areas. It's a quiet and tranquil neighborhood, lots of walkers, dogs, children etc. Not conducive to adding these Huge numbers of folks and unbelievable amount of traffic etc. The decrease in our home values. This will be a huge impact! January 24, 2022, 11:48 AM Natalie Woodward 5369 Owens Street Arvada, 80002 Good morning. I wish to publicly say that this subdivision is already taking on 250-500 new row housing and family condos and some private housing in this small area of land. There is no way another 300 units can be added and expected to thrive in this Arvada Community. There are no schools being built, Grocery Stores, Gas Stations, Restaurants etc. for all these people to attend regarding daily life. This subdivision already has a facility housing sex offender, a government run section 8 low-income housing that brings in these issues of drug use, gangs and other problems This is a low-income Government housing that has already taken up more police attention than Arvada has and building another 300 units will father stretch our Police Dept. and add more crime to our Residential neighborhood. This is a residential neighborhood and not a low-income neighborhood. This housing will only hurt the residential families that live here and are being drawn into the new builds that are under construction. We need to make the Government housing that is already here cleaner and better for the people that live there! Not add more housing! I do not feel comfortable to have my children and other children waiting for the school buses and doing daily activities around the individuals that this Low-Income Housing will bring. I know this because of the City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 7 experiences I have every day with the other low-income housing that are in Arvada/Wheat Ridge area. Thank you for letting us be heard. January 24, 2022, 11:36 AM Kellydeen McKinney 11251 W. 54th Ave. Arvada, 80002 I am a 3rd generation Coloradan. I am very much for affordable housing. However, I agree with comments that this development would be introducing too much density for the neighborhood to support and needs to be more thought out on a community level. Often new development does not adequately provide enough parking for its new residents. New development will often inaccurately predict that new residents will utilize public transportation more than they do. To provide enough space for families they either do not give enough green space per family in front of the building or behind and I believe in neighborhoods with a yard per family because I have seen what it provides for my own child’s development. I believe in quality over quantity. I love that Wheat Ridge still has organic growth with independent businesses and not planned housing communities envisioned by developers. Tennyson, where I grew up, has become a wind tunnel with little shade and no parking, and smells like dog piss because there is not enough green space or yards per family. It has a lot more traffic and I now, when I visit my dad in that neighborhood, I avoid streets where these mixed-use buildings are, and I see how it pushes through-traffic into the surrounding neighborhood making the side streets more dangerous because that is not what they were designed for either. I have seen several of these types of mixed-use developments. Mixed use developments and apartments and buildings over 2 floor heights belong downtown where density already exists and there is no commute for residents, not in Wheat Ridge. I do not believe there is enough land for the max units they have mentioned and for this still to be a quality community with 1 family houses and yards and zoned properly. I think 1- family housing with yards and setbacks and space for the cars and people and pets that will actually be in a community is the type of affordable housing and community that we should strive for. Again, quality over quantity. I agree with the sentiment to look at the traffic this would introduce, that the zoning should be single family residences if it is to change and that the schools needed are there and have funding and capacity to accommodate new residents. January 24, 2022, 11:27 AM Sarah Healey 3375 Wright St Wheat Ridge , 80033 Our comment is in regard to Item No.2 - We are STRONGLY against this proposal as our home literally backs to this parcel. We have been here for 17 years and would prefer looking at the current eyesore than have our property values tank. We have worked extremely hard to be able to afford this place that we call home and to feel safe City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 8 in and around our neighborhood. We all know that crime will follow, and the police do not have time or resources to control this anymore. While there may be a social need for low-income housing within the City of Wheat Ridge there has to be a more suitable location for this to happen and not next to $800,000+ homes. The infrastructure simply cannot handle this influx based on all of the current building, traffic and crime that has been on the rise in recent years. Please do not ruin our neighborhood further. January 24, 2022, 11:25 AM Miles and Wendi Griffith 5312 Nelson Street Arvada, 80002 I support the initiative - anything we can do to provide affordable housing to those who qualify is positive. The rents on the Front Range are out of control. The City and community should be prepared to provide services to help those living there be stable and successful. The fears of increased crime and traffic, etc., are legitimate but the need to do something to address our homeless problem is paramount. New affordable housing will help. Thank you. January 24, 2022, 11:25 AM Rose Malone 3220 Arbutus St Golden, 80401 I am in favor of affordable housing being built in Wheat Ridge. I understand there are concerns, but I hope the city and the community of Wheat Ridge supports this possibility. I do not see how there can be any improvement in our homeless situation, unless more units of housing are built. This is true for all the Front Range, sadly. Stabilized / housed living and an opportunity for children’s improved educational opportunities would help poor people move out of poverty - I am all for it. I am not an immediate neighbor, but we owned in WR for many years and continue to do so. It is a wonderful city and our home values have increased to an absurd degree over time. I don’t know how anyone affords housing these days. January 24, 2022, 11:18 AM Rosemary Motisi 3220 Arbutus Street Golden, CO, 80401 Hello, I am letting you know that I OPPOSE this project at this specific location of 54th and Miller Street. I understand the need for affordable housing, but this #2 location is not best suited for this high-density affordable housing (SECTION 8) project . There are other locations throughout Wheat Ridge and other cities within Jefferson County that are not surrounded by well-established higher end homes and Apartments that can be City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 9 a much better choice for this kind of project. This area has already been inundated with several other projects buying up very vacant pieces of land to build large apartment complexes and single-family homes. The traffic that has come with all of this building is already out of control and another 300-unit complex will significantly add to this current problem not to mention the crime and other issues that we all know follow. Everyone can deny or say that it doesn’t bring these issues along with it but if you look at all the stats from other Section 8 locations you will see that this is the case. We purchased in this area for a reason. We have worked extremely hard to be able to afford a home here with hopes of increased value to give us a better life. This will only drop all property values throughout the area which I don’t think is the goal of any of the community members living in the area and would also not be beneficial for the City. So, as you can see there are several different impacts to all residents within this community of the proposed project. I am not surprised that we had to hear about this High Density 300- unit affordable housing (SECTION 8) project through social media instead of through community outreach from our local government representatives. SHAME SHAME SHAME on you City of Wheat Ridge and Jefferson County. So much for being transparent with the residents of your community… sneaking through a project like this under the radar. January 24, 2022, 10:56 AM Lance Carpenter 5318 NELSON ST Arvada, 80004 My comment is in regard to Site #2 proposed by Foothills Regional Housing. I am vehemently against this proposed development. Our property backs to a parcel that would need to be rezoned to accomplish this project. When we built our home in 2004, we proactively contacted Wheat Ridge to find out what would be allowed on the property directly behind our home. At that time, I was told that it was currently zoned Agricultural and the only types of businesses that would be allowed would be something like a greenhouse. This put our minds at ease, and we went ahead with the build. Now, 17 years later, we are finding out that there are plans in motion to rezone this property and turn it into high-density low income (Section 8) housing and to make matters worse, potentially a Jefferson County Human Services office. This is extremely detrimental to not only our property values, but our way of life. The additional traffic, parking issues, noise and potential crime, are a sure recipe for economic obsolescence of not only the adjacent properties, but of the entire neighborhood, especially those located on the south side of Skyline Estates. We have all worked hard to be able to live in this wonderful neighborhood and it is not right to have our property values decrease due to something that is out of our control, while the rest of the metro area is gaining equity in their homes. I realize that there is a need for low-income (Section 8) housing in the City of Wheat Ridge, but it does NOT need to be placed right next to a subdivision similar to Skyline with $800,000 homes. A project of this magnitude is absolutely absurd in this location. A SMALL development with limited units City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 10 located where the old building is along 54th would make more sense due to the current zoning of that parcel, but this planned development is massive. It seems that this project is being hidden and is being quietly pushed through in hopes that the residents of Skyline won’t find out anything about it until it is too late. As elected representatives of our City Council, I would like you to look at yourselves in the mirror and honestly ask yourselves if you would be okay with this development if it were literally in your backyard. If not, I respectfully ask you to disallow this development at this location, and to find a place that would be more suitable. January 24, 2022, 10:51 AM Cathy Carpenter 5318 Nelson Street Arvada, 80002 Dear Wheat Ridge city council, we are very concerned about the idea of putting 300 low-income housing units in the lot at 54th & Miller Streets. Hopefully this is not a done deal that someone has tried to sneak through. We only heard about it over the weekend. 300 units is way too much to put in this small area. All of the neighbors that we have spoken to on Nelson St. are very, very concerned that this will drive down our property values. Subsidized housing should not be built so close to $800,000.00 + homes. The homes of the neighbors on the East side of Nelson St. will back up to all of these new units. This is surely not something that anyone would have to look at in their back yard. Please know that Skyline estates residents would like a meeting (not virtual) to discuss what is being considered. Thank you, Dale & Rhein Squillace 03- 422-5597 Home 303-881- 0128 Cell January 24, 2022, 10:18 AM Dale R & RhueAnn Squillace 5311 Nelson St. Arvada, Co. 80002 Arvada, 80002 My family of 8 live within walking distance of this development proposal and we strongly oppose this measure. I too am concerned with the crime this development may bring as affordable housing locations in the area and specifically near I-70 and Kipling already have a high crime rate. The density is also an issue. More housing for sale in the open market vs. rentals is fine if the projects are valued and sold at market rates. Additional housing options made available in the free market for the area to flourish naturally would be ok however, we do not support an affordable housing option here next door to our community. January 24, 2022, 10:07 AM Paul Pelican 10954 W 54TH LN City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 11 Arvada, 80002 Please see the attached 2-page document regarding issues with site #2 of the proposed LIH project at 54th and Miller. January 24, 2022, 9:15 AM Attachments [See Attachment #1 below] Joy Wollesen 5282 Quail Street Wheat Ridge, 80033 I and my family live in the quail ridge estates 5336 Johnson. which is less than 1 mile from this site. Ridge road cannot support the amount of traffic that is here now. There is no way that it will support the traffic that another 300 homes would bring. It’s irresponsible to build another 300 homes here before the projects that are already going on have been completed. We have to see the impact that has on traffic before we try and cram another 300 homes in here. This will drastically reduce the value of my home. Please, let’s not try and Cram another housing project in this area until the info structure is in place to support it. The amount of new homes that are already being built in this area is TOO MUCH! We cannot propose building another 300 homes in this area. Haskins station is not finished yet and when it is, it will bring with it an enormous traffic issue on Ridge Road. It doesn’t seem that anyone is thinking before these housing projects are being approved. There’s land so “let’s build” no thought of how this will impact the area . How it will forever change the Arvada, Wheat Ridge residents that have called this area home for generations! NO! NO! NO! Please do not do this! January 23, 2022, 11:13 PM Jonathan D. Brandow 5266 Pierson Street Wheat Ridge, 80033 Affordable housing is good for the community. It provides an opportunity for parents to rear their children in a stable environment. January 23, 2022, 9:57 PM Linda Foreman 30 Morningside Dr. Wheat Ridge, 80215 We do not need another apartment complex in this area! And we definitely do not need a low-income housing complex! The low-income housing will decrease our property values, increase the crime rate, and increase traffic in the area. There are other areas in City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 12 Jefferson County that would be more suitable for this and the FRH needs to keep looking at other options and not at the location proposed at 54th and Miller. January 23, 2022, 8:39 PM Michelle Stieben 5285 Pierson Court Wheat Ridge, 80033 I am very concerned about this project and others. Recent events of the Marshall Fire must have us considering the future with regards to water usage, water drainage and density of urban areas in a dry and drought prone climate. I am requesting that a full study of the water requirements be completed before we approve this project. Without data to show that this project will not, when in connection with other new build projects, does not overwhelm our water supply in the next 10 years. This study should review the water supply with our current level of drought in the state. Please take great care that we not set up our community with a future tragedy such as the Marshal Fire for projects such as these. Thank you, Toby Stilling January 23, 2022, 7:50 PM Toby Stilling 10813 W 85th Ave Arvada, 80005-4792 As a third generation Colorado native, I am heartsick that so many of our citizens are not able to buy a home in the Denver metro area. My own children are forced to pay excessive rent because even a starter home is out of reach. I believe that it is a moral obligation for our elected officials to support affordable housing initiatives and vote accordingly. I also believe that there should be restrictions concerning individuals and corporations buying multiple houses and keeping them out of the marketplace. A good example of mixed-use housing exists on the grounds where I attended high school in the 1960's at 52nd and Federal where homes, apartments and habitat for humanity housing share the complex. January 23, 2022, 7:05 PM Janet Swank 5091 Garrison St. Wheat Ridge I would like to express my support for the affordable housing bonds. January 23, 2022, 6:42 PM Eric Wilson 3743 Jay St. Wheat Ridge, 80033 Please do not ruin my neighborhood. I have no problem with affordable housing, but this type and density is too much for that location to absorb. This feels like a punitive measure for complaining about the disgraceful abandoned buildings that have been left City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 13 there. You are tanking my home value and being sneaky about doing so. I do not appreciate Wheat Ridge making this an Arvada issue. January 23, 2022, 5:24 PM Aaron Nuyt 10523 W 54th Place Arvada, 80002 Hello, we live in a fairly new development to the west of one of the proposed low- income housing sites (site 2). We would like to state our concerns with the proposed project as there is already a low-income housing site near our location that brings a ton of crime to our neighborhood and the surrounding neighborhoods. Not to mention that with all of the new housing projects currently under way, there is not enough road infrastructure for all of the added traffic that the current and proposed new housing projects will add to the one lane roads surrounding this area. The low-income housing sites will reduce the property value of our homes. Name and house number withheld at commenter’s request NNNN PARFET ST, ARVADA, 80002-4947 PUBLIC’S RIGHT TO SPEAK Margie Robinson, 4 Hillside Drive. Called to comment on the Study Session agenda. She supports partnering of the Foothills Housing Authority to expand affordable housing options. We need to increase the number of affordable houses. Joy Wallesen, 5282 Quail St. She called express her opposition to the affordable housing at 44th Ave and Miller St. She enumerated several reasons for her opposition, which she also wrote about in a post on Wheat Ridge Speaks tonight. We need to better understand what is proposed here and 300 units is too many for the size of the lot and for the proposed location. Jeff Moore, 5275 Pierson Ct. Called to oppose locating 300 units of what is likely to be Section 8 housing. The proposed project does not have enough infrastructure to support that kind of development. He believes that this affordable housing will not help our essential workers, like supermarket workers and first responders. If the project goes forward, our real estate values will plummet, and he will sell his home and leave Wheat Ridge. Ali Vance, 10542 W. 54th Place, Arvada, called to oppose the development at 54th and Miller. It is small plot of land surrounded by single family homes and the proposed development has too many units in higher profile buildings that we do not want. We are concerned about traffic increases, drag racing on nearby streets and public safety is at risk. Council, if this were going into your neighborhood, next to your home, would you want this development in your neighborhood. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 14 5344 Oak Ct., Arvada. Called to speak about his opposition to the planned development. He has a major concern about communication among the Cities of Wheat Ridge and Arvada and the State. We hear a lot of talk by Wheat Ridge wanting to develop our City but at the same time I see that 654 feet of sidewalk is not assured in this plan. I oppose Section 8 housing because of the crime problems that Section 8 housing always bring. This does not fit the neighborhood surrounding the proposed development. The City of Arvada has allowed developers to bring this kind of housing to the area, but I hope Wheat Ridge will not buy that same argument. DeWayne Crowder, 5360 Nelson St., which would be contiguous to my property. I agree with the previous speakers who oppose this proposed development for the reasons they stated. Tom and Kim Vanderveen, 5377 Profit, Arvada. Tom was an Arvada police officer for 35 years and he has seen the crime and density issues that these developments bring. Numerous crime statistics prove that when you build this kind of housing the neighborhood declines in every way. Brannie Brown, 11437 W. 55th Lane, Arvada, nearby the proposed development. She also opposes the planned/proposed development. Sara Sweedock, 5222 Quail St. A lot of homeless people come to our neighborhood come into my knighthood at night and do mischief and crimes. We do not need this development where is it proposed. Armando Blanco, 5396 Nelson St. Also lives adjacent to the proposed development and also adamantly opposes it. He cited similar arguments about concerns about traffic, density, public safety and crime. Where else in Wheat Ridge can we put this, because the proposed site is not the right one. Ken and Kally Haag, 5315 Newcombe St., Arvada. Called to briefly echo the other residents comments in opposition to this proposed project. The project has no proposed sidewalks so people would have to walk in front of this development in danger of traffic. Erica Nollen, 5353 Parfet St. called to strongly oppose this development as inap- propriate for the same reasons and concerns others have expressed this evening. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Discussion began at approximately 7:40 PM. CM Stites introduced the consent agenda. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 15 a. Motion to approve the purchase and payment of 2022 vehicle replacements and additions and the installation of lighting and auxiliary equipment in a total amount not to exceed $862,008 Issue Twelve existing vehicles in the City’s fleet are programmed for replacement in 2022 in accordance with the City’s Vehicle Replacement Policy. Four additional vehicles are proposed for purchase as new additions to the City’s fleet for Police Department patrol operations and Parks and Recreation Department forestry and open space operations. The cost of the vehicles is $695,308 plus $166,700 for auxiliary equipment, decals, marking and other miscellaneous equipment for a total cost of $862,008. Motion by CM Stites to approve Consent Agenda Item a.), Seconded by CM Hoppe, motion carried 8-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING There were no readings tonight ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING There were no readings tonight DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS AND MOTIONS 2. Motion to approve an amendment to a contract with Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., Denver, CO, and subsequent payments, in an amount not to exceed $592,858.94 for professional services to complete the construction plans and specifications for Wheat Ridge Ward Road Station pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements Discussion began at 7:44 pm. CM Nosler Beck introduced the Motion. Issue Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) was contracted to perform design services for the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements at the Wheat Ridge · Ward Station area in 2019. That contract was suspended in 2020 to divert funding from this project to the Clear Creek Crossing hook ramp project. Renewal Wheat Ridge issued bonds in 2021, of which a portion those bonds have been allocated to complete the design, construction plans and specifications for the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements. An amendment to task order #5 of the contract with SEH needs to be approved to restart the design of the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements and prepare construction plans and specifications. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 16 Staff Presentation Mr. Westberg spoke on how the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvement projects at the Wheat Ridge · Ward Station area were put on hold in 2020 to allow the remaining funding to be transferred to the Clear Creek Crossing project to complete the hook ramps on I-70. As the conceptual plans were being developed in early 2020, potential cost overruns were identified. So, in the spring of 2020, a value engineering (VE) process was done on these projects to keep the projects within budget. In addition to making some of the design of the various elements more efficient and therefore less costly, what were deemed as non-critical enhancements were also identified and removed. Since the funding for the projects will now be from a Renewal Wheat Ridge Bond instead of the 2017 2E bonds, staff has requested that the consultant restore some of the enhancements, but not the less than efficient design elements, that were removed during VE. Public Comment Sara Sweedock, 5222 Quail St. - called again to ask why we are constructing this bridge near the Ward Road Station when it connects to nothing on the south side of the bridge. Why are there no sidewalks planned? Can we get some commercial development like convenience stores or other small businesses rather than more residences? (Mr. Westberg replied to her comments.) Council Questions CM Weaver asked about how the value engineering method to use runoff water might help us as the climate gets drier and drier. Mr. Westberg gave a detailed reply. CM Ohm asked about whether the contractors engaged now will be engaged throughout the project. Again, Mr. Westberg gave a detailed reply. CM Hultin asked about provisions and options for better bike and pedestrian traffic. Mr. Westberg provided an explanation of the study of those needs to date and the work remaining to be done. CM HCM Hultin opined that some of the Federal funding passed last year would support funding this purpose for cyclists and pedestrians. CM Nosler Beck asked that staff consider carefully the comments from people nearby this project and Ward Road Station earlier this evening. Mr. Johnstone provided background information and plans going forward. Motion by CM Nosler Beck to approve an amendment to a contract with Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., Denver, CO, and subsequent payments, in an amount not to exceed $592,858.94 for professional services to complete the construction plans and City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 17 specifications for the Wheat Ridge Ward Station pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements, seconded by CM Stites, motion carried 8-0. CM Hoppe thanked Renewal Wheat Ridge for their support for this project, including funding, and Mr. Westberg for his hard work. 3. Motion to approve an amendment to a contract with HDR, Inc., Denver, CO, and subsequent payments, in an amount not to exceed $116,710.31 for professional services for property acquisition services for Wheat Ridge Ward Road Station pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements. CM Dozeman introduced the Motion. Issue HDR was contracted to perform property acquisition services for the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements at the Wheat Ridge · Ward Station area in 2019. That contract was suspended in 2020 to divert funding from this project to the Clear Creek Crossing hook ramp project. Renewal Wheat Ridge issued bonds in 2021, of which a portion those bonds have been allocated to resume property acquisition services for the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements. An amendment to task order #2 of the contract with HDR needs to be approved to restart the property acquisition services for the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements. Staff Presentation Mark Westberg, Project Supervisor once again described how the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements projects at the Wheat Ridge · Ward Station area were put on hold in 2020 to allow the remaining design, ROW and construction funds to be transferred to the Clear Creek Crossing project. The property acquisition for the pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements projects had just started before the task order for the projects was suspended. Public Comment No one came forward to speak. Council Questions Council had no questions or concerns, as they were familiar with this project. Motion by CM Dozeman to approve an amendment to the contract with HDR, Inc, Denver, CO, and subsequent payments, in an amount not to exceed $116,710.31 for professional services to complete the property acquisition services for the Wheat Ridge Ward Station pedestrian bridge, plazas, and trail improvements, seconded by CM Nosler Beck, motion carried 8-0. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 18 CITY MANAGER’S MATTERS Mr. Goff deferred to the end of the Special Study Session. CITY ATTORNEY’S MATTERS Nothing tonight. ELECTED OFFICIALS’ MATTERS CM Hoppe has been elected to the Board of Porchlight Family Justice Center. She remarked that the Center and 75 other partner agencies offer many amazing services to the survivors of conflict and violence. For example, they work with on call volunteer doctors and nurses, who will come to the Center for treatment of sexual assault survivors rather than have traumatized survivors go to an emergency room. CM Hultin announced that on Saturday, February 5th she and CM Ohm will host the District II meeting. She will recognize those who have been good neighbors. The meeting will be held virtually; details to follow soon. CM Hultin also commented on the impact of CoVid in our City. Even larger stores are understaffed and cutting back hours at their locations. Please, support small businesses during this time when they need our purchases of their goods and services. CM Stites announced the District III meeting, tentatively planned for February 12 and more details to follow. He echoed CM Hultin’s comments on patronizing restaurants and bars in Wheat Ridge. Please, support the local businesses in Wheat Ridge! CM Nosler Beck proposed a Study Session in which we address some of the connectivity issues near Ward St. Station. CM Hultin agreed and will add it to the queue for Study Sessions. CM Nosler Beck was recently appointed to the Jefferson County Accessibility and Inclusiveness Task Force and encourages others to get involved. She thanked those who responded to the needs of those recently impacted by the Marshall Fire disaster in Boulder County. She grew up in Louisville and is very appreciative that so many have risen to the occasion to help their neighbors in need. She also thanked the teachers at Wilmore Davis for helping families and students through the CoVid surge and to help students continue to learn during difficult times. Mayor Starker reported on a meeting today with Congressional Rep. Perlmutter, Senator Michael Bennett, other elected officials and CDOC leaders at the Kipling and I-70 interchange project. The Mayor enumerated a number of other bridge and overpass repair or reconstruction project coming to WR soon. He thanked our partners at the Federal, State and local levels for their hope. ADJOURNMENT TO SPECIAL STUDY SESSION The meeting adjourned at 8:28 pm. City Council Minutes January 24, 2022 page 19 _____________________________ Steve Kirkpatrick, City Clerk APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 14, 2022 ______________________________ Rachel Hultin, Mayor Pro Tem The preceding Minutes were prepared according to §47 of Robert’s Rules of Order, i.e., they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD’s of the meetings are available for listening or viewing by contacting the City Clerk’s Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION NOTES CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO City Council Chambers 7500 W. 29th Avenue January 24, 2022 Upon adjournment of the Regular City Council Meeting, the Mayor called this Special Study Session to order after a brief recess at 8:40 p.m. This meeting was conducted as a VIRTUAL MEETING. No members of the Council were physically present at the Municipal building for this meeting; the public did not attend in person. Mayor Starker welcomed the Council, other elected officials, staff and interested citizens. The Mayor also explained the virtual meeting format, how citizens will have the opportunity to be heard, and the procedures and policies to be followed. Council members present: Amanda Weaver, Judy Hutchinson, Scott Ohm, Janeece Hoppe, Rachel Hultin, Korey Stites, Valerie Nosler Beck, and Leah Dozeman. Also present: City Attorney Gerald Dahl; City Clerk, Steve Kirkpatrick; City Treasurer Chris Miller, City Manager Patrick Goff; Director of Administration, Allison Scheck; Director of Planning, Lauren Mikulak; Stephanie Stevens, Senior City Planner; City Attorney, Jerry Dahl; Director of Finance, Mark Colvin, Lori Rosendahl, Jefferson Housing Authority, guests and interested citizens. Public Comment on Agenda Items – Dennis Peter, Skyline Estates. Called to ask if Council is discussing a specific project. The Mayor answered that Council is not considering a particular project at this time. Note about Wheat Ridge Speaks: The public may visit the Wheat Ridge Speaks website and enter written comments of up to 1,000 words on any Council agenda item. The deadline for citizens to submit comments is 12:00 Noon Mountain Time on the day of a Council session so that Council members, other elected officials and City Staff have time to review the comments before the meeting on Monday evening. The City Clerk’s Office transcribes those Wheat Ridge Speaks comments into these minutes, placing each comment along with the record for that agenda item, including items that include a public hearing (verbatim, if the comments do not contain lascivious language or unlawful hate speech). There were no public comments entered into Wheat Ridge Speaks related to this session. 1. Delegation of Private Activity Bond Cap to Foothills Regional Housing Issue The City of Wheat Ridge has received an allocation of $1,789,050 for the purpose of issuing Private Activity Bonds (PABs) in 2022 under the state ceiling imposed by the Tax Reform Act of 1987. Staff recommends assigning 100 percent of the City’s allocation to Jefferson County Housing Authority d/b/a Foothills Regional Housing (FRH) which has agreed to issue PABs for the produce new affordable housing units on two sites within the City of Wheat Ridge. Due to ongoing negotiations regarding land acquisition, FRH is unable to publicly provide greater specificity on site location. However, project summaries for both sites can be found in the attached PAB request letter from FRH. City Manager Patrick Goff Director explained that Private Activity Bonds (PABs) are tax exempt bonds designed to offer low-cost financing to private sector borrowers for projects that create jobs and expand the tax bases of local communities. PABs may be used to finance a broad array of community development projects including housing, manufacturing, higher education, infrastructure, and environmental projects. The bonding authority which allows the issuance of PABs is Volume Cap, created under the federal Tax Reform Act of 1986. The federal government allocates a maximum amount of Volume Cap use to each state annually. Per Colorado statute, the Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) administers the state’s allocation of Volume Cap. Under the statute, 50 percent of Colorado’s allocation is given to five statewide authorities, with DOLA deciding the proportional allocation of each Councilmembers had questions and comments: CM Hutchinson asked Ms. Case when we need to have these funds approved. Ms. Case replied: September 2022. CM Hutchinson opined that the communication about this matter has confused our residents. She is concerned that there are no disclosures about where projects will be funded or where they will be located. People are freaking out because they feel unfairly treated. Please, be transparent and disclose what you plan to do with these funds. CM Hoppe asked staff to explain what happens if WR does not accept this money. Mr. Goff explained the monies will go back to the State. CM Hoppe asked Mr. Goff to explain the process the Housing Authority would have to undertake in order to get a project through Planning staff and Planning Commission, which would take years and require many public meetings and hearings. CM Nosler Beck asked whether the two sites listed were intended as examples of the kinds of projects that would be possible as opposed to proposed projects. Ms. Case provided a detailed response. She recalled an earlier Study Session on affordable housing and gave examples of people who would benefit from affordable housing. She asked that people consider real people who might live in this housing, like those who take care of our elderly and our first responders. Ms. Rosendahl commented that there is no public housing in Jefferson County, there never has been any; there is no Section 8 housing in Jefferson County, and none is planned or even proposed. CM Dozeman commented on how the memo distributed for this evening’s meeting would arouse opposition among residents. It was confusing and easily misinterpreted. She understands that affordable housing is important in WR, and that there are some community discussions we need to have. CM Hutchinson asked what the City’s target for a total population in Wheat Ridge. She believes that there are too many more residents coming based on staff’s plans for growth. Mr. Goff replied to CM Hutchinson’s comments, saying that staff has no such target population number and that he resented the implication of inappropriate behavior on the part of our staff. CM Hultin proposed a consensus to move forward with specific code changes and make the grace period to come into compliance within 3-6 months of the date when the ordinance takes effect, with a variance process. CM Ohm asked the Housing Authority whether the Housing Authority funds mixed use housing and commercial developments. Ms. Rosendahl answered in great detail with examples. CM Hultin commented that she supports this Activity Bond measure. The best way to address issues like affordable housing, homelessness and other needs is to cooperate on a regional level with other municipalities. The packet for this meeting was confusing, even for her, so she understands why people were concerned, even outraged. CM Nosler Beck asked that someone explain what the first step in the process would be when the public would have a chance to comment and participate if there are any proposed projects with these Regional Housing Authority funds. Mr. Goff provided a detailed answer. Ms. Rosendahl added that the funds under consideration here would never be enough funding from this source alone to fund a project. That level of funding would have to come from several municipalities/jurisdictions. CM Hoppe thanked the RHA for their work and will support approving the allocation proposed. CM Hultin commented on the City’s efforts to keep our residents informed about City business on many levels through many media. She encouraged residents to avail themselves of these communication channels. She proposed a consensus to allocate the funds as proposed. Consensus achieved. Staff Report(s) Mr. Goff asked about dates in April for a joint, one-hour meeting with Jefferson County School Board members and staff. He announced that the 2021 budget looks very strong, with double digit increases on several revenue lines. Expenditures are on par with 2020. He will come to Council soon with a Study Session on how we can use the available funds for strategic priorities. Elected Officials’ Report(s) Nothing further, as this session immediately followed a Regular Council Meeting. ADJOURNMENT The Special Study Session adjourned at 9:22 pm. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON February 14, 2022. _________________________________ Steve Kirkpatrick, City Clerk _________________________________ Rachel Hultin, Mayor Pro Tem ITEM NO: 1a DATE: February 14, 2022 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 07-2022 – A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022 BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE RE-APPROPRIATION AND RE-ENCUMBRANCE OF 2021 FISCAL YEAR ENCUMBERED FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,475,027.97 PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Administrative Services Director City Manager ISSUE: There are 44 open purchase orders from the 2021 budget that will be carried over to the 2022 budget. Each purchase order is associated with a specific project that was not fully completed in the 2021 fiscal year. The funds which were encumbered for these purchase orders were transferred to the unreserved fund balance of the relevant fund when the purchase orders were closed. To continue or close out these projects in 2022, a supplemental budget appropriation in the amount of $4,475,027.97 is necessary to allow transfer of these funds into specific budget line items in the 2022 Budget. PRIOR ACTION: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: A supplemental budget appropriation is requested in the amount of $4,475,027.97. When the purchase orders were closed on December 31, 2021, the funds encumbered for those purchase orders were transferred to the unreserved fund balance in each of the funds listed below. Therefore, Council Action Form – Budget Carryovers February 14, 2022 Page 2 there are adequate funds in the various unreserved fund balances to meet this request and there will not be a net negative effect to the unreserved fund balances. A detailed list of open purchase orders for 2021 is attached. The funds will be distributed as follows: General Fund $ 865,977.32 Capital Improvement Program Fund (CIP) $ 701,523.44 2E Bond Fund $ 93,375.54 Open Space Fund $ 2,279,268.84 Conservation Trust Fund $ 534,882.83 Total: $ 4,475,027.97 BACKGROUND: Per the direction of City Council in 2005, the City utilizes generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) which requires all encumbrances expire at year-end. A particular challenge experienced in 2021, and the reason for many of the carryover requests as specified on the open purchase order report, is delayed services and product deliveries due to supply chain issues. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the supplemental budget appropriations. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Resolution No. 07-2022, a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the re-appropriation and re-encumbrance of the 2021 fiscal year encumbered funds in the amount of $4,475,027.97.” Or, “I move to postpone indefinitely Resolution No.07-2022, a resolution amending the Fiscal Year 2022 Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation for the re-appropriation and re-encumbrance of the 2021 fiscal year encumbered funds in the amount of $4,475,027.97 for the following reason(s) _______________________________.” REPORT PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY: Whitney Mugford-Smith, Procurement Manager Allison Scheck, Administrative Services Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 07-2022 2. Open Purchase Order Report for 2021 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 07 Series of 2022 TITLE: A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2022 BUDGET TO REFLECT THE APPROVAL OF A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET APPROPRIATION FOR THE RE-APPROPRIATION AND RE-ENCUMBRANCE OF 2021 FISCAL YEAR ENCUMBERED FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,475,027.97 WHEREAS, the City’s independent auditor has recommended that the City utilize generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for its budgeting basis which requires all encumbrances to expire at year end; and WHEREAS, 44 purchase orders remained open on December 31, 2021; and WHEREAS, to continue these projects in 2022 a supplemental budget appropriation is necessary to transfer the funds from unreserved fund balances to specific 2022 budget line items. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows: The City of Wheat Ridge fiscal year 2022 Budget be amended accordingly, specifically transferring a total of $4,475,027.97 from the following unreserved fund balances to specific 2022 Budget line items as detailed in the attached spreadsheets: General Fund $ 865,977.32 Capital Improvement Program Fund (CIP) $ 701,523.44 2E Bond Fund $ 93,375.54 Open Space Fund $ 2,279,268.84 Conservation Trust Fund $ 534,882.83 Total: $ 4,475,027.97 DONE AND RESOLVED this 14th day of February 2022. Bud Starker, Mayor ATTEST: Steve Kirkpatrick, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 1 Fund / Vendor Description Original $Open Amount Reason for Carryover 01 - General Fund 24-7 Networks Inc 6 Cisco Routers $46,477.68 $34,472.10 Routers were not delivered in 2021 due to supply chain issues Salt Lake Wholesale Police Ammunition 9mm 124 grain American Eagle 25 cases $15,544.90 $4,876.00 Ammunition not delivered in 2021 as planned due to supply chain issues Salt Lake Wholesale Range Supplies $7,210.00 $7,210.00 Ammunition not delivered in 2021 as planned due to supply chain issues Atlantic Signal Police Tactical Comms Equipment for SWAT $16,755.00 $16,755.00 Atlantic Signal has been unable to source the headsets due to supply chain issues Mountaintop Mechanical Emergency heater repair for Public Works facility $2,675.62 $2,675.62 Work cannot be completed until early 2022 Altitude Signal (2) SpeedAlert Radar Message Sign; base unit with mounting bracket $11,110.00 $11,110.00 Delivery is estimated late January 2022 Various Vendors Facility Signage Replacement for the Recreation Center, as part of the Facility Redesign Project $6,500.00 $6,500.00 ADA requirement significantly added to overall cost and extended the length of the project BerryDunn ERP Consultant Services $90,400.00 $90,400.00 Council funded the project in 2021 to begin in early 2022 Various Vendors AV upgrades to Council Chambers $20,000.00 $20,000.00 AV upgrades to Council Chambers (carry forward of these funds does not affect the fund balance as these funds are restricted) GOVOS INC. / MuniRevs / Lodging Revs Short-term rental program management system $16,950.00 $1,986.25 Fund remainder of first year contract to manage short-term rental licensing and tax compliance MIG Inc. 44th Avenue Subarea Plan $175,000.00 $170,958.75 This project was originally awarded in December 2019. The project kicked off on March 13, 2020 and was immediately suspended due to the COVID- 19 pandemic. The project was re-budgeted by Council on June 14, 2021 as part of the 2021 budget supplemental KORF Continental Fleet Replacement - 2021 Ford F-250 $47,940.00 $47,940.00 Replacement truck for Unit 311 2021 Ford F-250 w/plow delayed due to supply chain issues McCandless International Fleet Replacement - 2021 International Cab & Chassis $88,595.00 $88,595.00 Replacement for Unit 249 2021 International single axle dump truck with equipment. Delayed due to supply chain issues Auto Truck Group Fleet Replacement - Up-Fit for New International Cab $98,238.00 $98,238.00 Upfit for 249-21 Various Equipment, lighting, hydraulics & options The Armored Group LLC Fleet Replacement - Armored Tactical Raid Van $83,250.00 $83,250.00 PD New Unit 2021 Ford T350 Chassis & Armor Package. Delayed due to supply chain issues L.L. Johnson Distribution (2) Toro Model 72918 Z-Master Mowers $23,304.00 $23,304.00 Original delivery set for Dec 2021, due to supply change issues, delivery has been delayed to February. L.L. Johnson Distribution Mower Accessories $9,026.05 $9,026.05 Delivery in February 2022 due to supply chain issues Various Vendors - (Davey and Root)2021 Forestry Service $55,000.00 $10,000.00 Davey and Root are in the process of completing the final work planned for 2021 Various Vendors 2021 Hazardous Tree Grant $22,500.00 $22,500.00 Due to timeframe of grant being awarded to applicants, the submissions for reimbursements have been delayed due to tree company schedules Various Vendors 38th Avenue Pop-up Patio Sets $60,000.00 $31,057.55 Planning to order materials for 2nd patio in 2022. Various Vendors (concrete and installation contractors)Purchase and Installation of Outdoor Fitness Court $72,037.00 $72,037.00 Council appropriated funding for the Naitonal Campain Fitness Court last fall. This remaining amount funds the concrete and installation scheduled for spring 2022 United Facility Solutions Group 2021 Bus Shelter Cleaning $70,000.00 $9,886.00 Awaiting year end invoices from the vendor Various Vendors Lockers for persons experiencing homelessness $3,200.00 $3,200.00 These funds are earmarked for the purchase of outdoor storage lockers for individuals experiencing homelessness to be located at Anderson Park/outside of the PFOS building. Our Homeless Navigator and PFOS Manager are currently researching potential locker options 01 - General Fund Total $865,977.32 ATTACHMENT 2 AECOM Technical Service Restart and complete the streets and intersection at Ridge and Ward Roads $10,590.00 $6,777.37 Gold Line Station Street/ Intersections Projects SEH Re-engaging professional services $188,324.32 $96,221.07 Gold Line Station Street/ Intersections Projects AECOM Technical Service 2021 Task C Professional Services - Wadsworth Improvement $756,982.00 $521,818.27 Construction - ongoing Wadsworth Improvement Project Dunakilly Management 2022 Capital Improvement Projects $6,600.00 $2,793.75 Project was put on hold until Facilities Manager position was filled Seven Point Construction City Hall 2nd Floor Kitchenette Reno $20,955.00 $20,955.00 Project was put on hold until Facilities Manager position was filled Officescapes City Hall 2nd Floor Comm Dev Reconfigure $9,359.40 $9,359.40 Project was put on hold until Facilities Manager position was filled Various Vendors Workstation reconfiguration and kitchenette update at City Hall.$39,476.73 $9,043.33 Project was put on hold until Facilities Manager position was filled Flatirons ROW Mapping - Project 1 $24,960.00 $9,187.50 Project is ongoing, awaiting final deliverable Flatirons ROW Mapping - Project 2 $3,500.00 $12,658.75 Project is ongoing, awaiting final deliverable Flatirons ROW Mapping- Project 3 $31,380.00 $12,709.00 Project is ongoing, awaiting final deliverable $701,523.44 31 - 2E Fund AECOM Technical Services Task B - CCC - Working through end of year and will not provide invoice until Jan 2022 $2,696,248.00 $93,375.54 Working through end of 2021, will not provide invoice until early 2022 $93,375.54 32 - Open Space Fund Various Vendors Nature Play Area $35,175.00 $35,175.00 Due to timing, this will need to be carried into 2022 Various Vendors Nature Play Area $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Due to timing, this will need to be carried into 2022 Various Vendors Open Space Management Plan $100,000.00 $100,000.00 Project has not been awarded yet Design Concepts Inc.Prospect Park Phase 2 construction support $59,180.00 $29,473.70 Project is ongoing Design Concepts Inc.Shelter Replacement Design $6,406.00 $5,317.00 Project is ongoing Farrington Construction Prospect Park Phase 2 Construction $2,493,469.00 $2,091,729.64 Project is ongoing The Architerra Group The Green at 38th is a multi-year project (likely going into 2023). Design services will continue to be needed in 2022, as we work toward a final design. $64,895.00 $12,573.50 Multi-year project $2,279,268.84 Colorado Mechanical Systems Pool Heaters and installation $43,413.00 $43,413.00 Vendor had supply chain issues Farrington Construction Prospect Park Phase 2 Construction $291,470.00 $291,470.00 Project is ongoing Farrington Construction Prospect Park Phase 2 Construction - Contingency $199,999.83 $199,999.83 Project is ongoing $534,882.83 $4,475,027.97 54 - Conservation Trust Fund Total 2021 Open Purchase Orders Total 30 - Capital Project Fund 30 - Capital Project Fund Total 31 - Ballot Issue 2E Fund Total 32 - Open Space Fund Total 54 - Conservation Trust Fund ITEM NO: 1b DATE: February 14, 2022 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC CALMING DEVICE ON 46TH AVENUE BETWEEN LAMAR STREET AND JAY STREET IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Community Development Director City Manager ISSUE: Residents on 46th Avenue petitioned the City to address traffic issues for the street segment from Lamar Street to Jay Street. In accordance with the City’s Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP), the City met with the residents at a neighborhood meeting and subsequently discussed and devised a plan to mitigate traffic issues. The residents then secured a petition with the necessary number of property owner signatures, supporting the installation of a speed hump in accordance with the NTMP policy and are hereby seeking approval for implementation. PRIOR ACTION: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for this program has been approved in the 2022 Capital Improvement Program Budget. The proposed street modifications can be installed at an estimated cost of $7,000. BACKGROUND: On April 28, 2014, City Council approved the NTMP to systematically address traffic issues on residential streets. The goal of the program is to foster safety and livability in neighborhoods by Council Action Form – 46th Avenue NTMP Plan Approval February 14, 2022 Page 2 reducing the negative impact of vehicular traffic and speeding on residential streets. The policy intent is to clearly identify a problem, if one exists, and ensure full support from the affected residents in devising a plan through consensus to a solution(s). The NTMP provides a means and process for residents to request consideration for the installation of traffic calming measures on local streets. Traffic calming measures may include speed humps, curb extensions, signs, speed trailers and enforcement, and other traffic control measures as requested and as applicable. On September 3, 2020, 46th Avenue residents filed a request for NTMP consideration to discuss traffic issues on 46th Avenue from Lamar Street to Jay Street. A meeting was conducted with the residents to examine the extent of the problems and to explore available solutions. A traffic study was conducted to analyze traffic speed, volume and vehicle classification. In addition, the engineering evaluation also looked at sight distance, drainage and roadway geometry, and staff determined that the street segment is suitable for a traffic calming treatment. Subsequent to the evaluation and findings, the residents elected to move forward with a permanent traffic calming solution, specifically speed hump installation. Staff identified one location for treatment for the requested segment between Lamar Street and Jay Street with the intent to curb excessive speeding. This segment of 46th Avenue is not part of an emergency route and is therefore eligible for traffic calming features in the roadway. In accordance with the NTMP, speed humps can be ordered for installation by the City Council if at least 80% of residents in a designated street segment sign the petition, including the residents who reside immediately adjacent to the speed humps. Based on the results of the petition received by the City, a sufficient number of signatures have been attained for one speed hump as referenced above. RECOMMENDATIONS: Residents on 46th Avenue, in the petition segment between Lamar Street and Jay Street, have satisfied the process outlined in the NTMP policy and through the staff evaluation process. As a result, staff recommends moving forward with installation of a speed hump on 46th Avenue as specifically requested by the residents. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve installation of a traffic calming device on 46th Avenue between Lamar Street and Jay Street in accordance with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program.” Or, “I move to deny approval of the installation of a traffic calming device on 46th Avenue between Lamar Street and Jay Street in accordance with the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP) for the following reason(s) ________________________________” Council Action Form – 46th Avenue NTMP Plan Approval February 14, 2022 Page 3 REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Ken Johnstone, Community Development Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Speed Hump Location Map 321'295' 206' 157' ATTACHMENT 1 ITEM NO: 2 DATE: February 14, 2022 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 01-2022 – AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9605 W. 38TH AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL-ONE (R-1) TO RESIDENTIAL-ONE B (R-1B) (CASE NO. WZ-21-12) PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (1/10/2022) BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (02/14/2022) RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _____________________________ Community Development Director City Manager ISSUE: The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) for property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue. The zone change retains the single-family character of the neighborhood and could allow the oversized subject property to accommodate two single-family homes in the future. PRIOR ACTION: Planning Commission reviewed this request at a public hearing held on December 16, 2021 and recommended approval. The Planning Division staff report and meeting minutes from the Planning Commission meeting are attached. City Council approved this ordinance on first reading on January 10, 2022. A motion was made by Councilmember Weaver and seconded by Councilmember Hoppe and was approved by a vote of 7-0. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed ordinance is not expected to have a direct financial impact on the City. Fees in the amount of $885.00 were collected for the review and processing of Case No. WZ-21-12. If the Council Action Form – Proposed Rezoning at 9605 W. 38th Avenue February 14, 2022 Page 2 rezoning is approved, the City may benefit from various fees collected depending on the future permitted use, such as building permit fees and use tax. BACKGROUND: The property is located at the northeast corner of W. 38th Avenue and Independence Court and is an oversized corner lot. An Improvement Survey Plat submitted by the applicant shows the property is almost twice the minimum size for R-1, measuring 21,065 square feet (0.48 acres) in size. The lot width parallel to W. 38th Avenue is 140 feet and the lot width parallel to Independence Court is 150 feet. The site is currently vacant land; the site previously contained a single-family house that was demolished in 2020. According to the Jefferson County Assessor, the home had originally been constructed in 1898, was 1,020 square feet in size, and was listed in fair condition. The site has roughly 15 feet of fall from the south end of the property to the north end. Current and Proposed Zoning The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B). Both zone districts are intended to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable low-density residential neighborhoods. Both zone districts allow only single-family home development—duplexes and multifamily are not permitted. The subject property is too small in either zone district to allow any of the nonresidential uses contemplated by the zoning (churches, schools, government buildings, and group homes). The applicant is requesting the zone change to R-1B so they can subdivide the oversized parcel and build two single-family homes. Surrounding zoning is predominantly R-1 and R-2 with a pocket of R-2A to the southwest, and surrounding land uses are mostly single-family homes and duplexes. While R-1B is not located in the area, the single-family zone district is consistent with the surrounding area and would not result in significant change to the area. The applicant desires to rezone in order to provide the opportunity to build two homes that are proportional to the lots and more affordable. An analysis of the zone change criteria is provided in the attached Planning Division staff report. RECOMMENDATIONS: The application in this case is for the rezoning of property. This action is quasi-judicial, and as a result, the applicant is entitled to a public hearing on the application. As Council is aware, rezoning in Wheat Ridge is accomplished by ordinance (Charter Sec. 5.10; Code Section 26-112). Ordinances require two readings, and by Charter, the public hearing takes place on second reading. Per City Code, the City Council shall use the criteria in Section 26-112 of the code to evaluate the applicant’s request for a zone change. A detailed Planning Division staff report is enclosed with this criteria analysis, as well as additional information on the existing conditions and zone districts. Staff is ultimately recommending approval of this request. Council Action Form – Proposed Rezoning at 9605 W. 38th Avenue February 14, 2022 Page 3 RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to approve Council Bill No. 01-2022, an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) on second reading, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication, for the following reasons: 1. The Planning Commission has recommended approval of the rezoning after conducting a proper public hearing. 2. The proposed rezoning has been reviewed by the Community Development Department, which has forwarded its recommendation of approval. 3. The proposed rezoning has been found to comply with the criteria for review in Section 26-112 of the Code of Laws.” Or, “I move to deny approval of Council Bill No. 01-2022, an ordinance approving the rezoning of property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) on second reading, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication, for the following reasons:___________________________ and direct the City Attorney to prepare a Resolution of Denial, to be scheduled for Council consideration at the next available regular business meeting.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development Director Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill No. 01-2022 2. Planning Commission Staff Report 3. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 4. Public Comments ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER WEAVER COUNCIL BILL NO. 01 ORDINANCE NO. 1731 Series of 2022 TITLE: AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE REZONING OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9605 W. 38TH AVENUE FROM RESIDENTIAL- ONE (R-1) TO RESIDENTIAL-ONE B (R-1B) (CASE NO. WZ-21-12) WHEREAS, Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws establishes procedures for the City’s review and approval of requests for land use cases; and WHEREAS, Jacob Hill has submitted a land use application for approval of a zone change to the Residential-One B (R-1B) zone district for property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge has adopted a comprehensive plan— Envision Wheat Ridge—which calls for “Neighborhood” uses in this area and to encourage reinvestment in property, maintain consistent character and create opportunities for home ownership; and WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 16, 2021 and voted to recommend approval of rezoning the property to Residential-One B (R-1B). NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO: Section 1. Upon application by Jacob Hill for approval of a zone change ordinance from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) for property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue, and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, a zone change is approved for the following described land: PARCEL A: THAT PART OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH , RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF INDEPENDENCE PLACE, WHICH IS 55 FEET SOUTH OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 7, NORTHERN SLOPE SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, WHICH IS THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE EAST 35.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 150 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE; THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 20.75 FEET; THENCE ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT WITH A15 FOOT RADIUS, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF INDEPENDENCE PLACE, WHICH POINT IS 134.2 FEET SOUTH OF THE POINT OF BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 134.2 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL B: THAT PART OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH , RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST 16TH CORNER ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 22, WHERE THE CENTERLINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE AND THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22 INTERSECT; THENCE NORTH 30 FEET AND WEST 15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ON THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE; THENCE CONTINUING WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 38TH AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 90 FEET; THENCE NORTH, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22, A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF WEST 38TTH AVENUE, A DISTANCE OF 90 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO A POINT 15 FEET WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 22; THENCE ALONG SAID LINE. A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL C: THAT PART OF THE EAST ONE-HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICH IS 15 FEET IN ITS EAST-WEST MEASUREMENT AND LIES IMMEDIATELY EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL B. Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this zone change does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and declares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 4. Severability; Conflicting Ordinance Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of the ordinance shall be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days after final publication, as provided by Section 5.11 of the Charter. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 7 to 0 on this 10th day of January, 2022, ordered it published with Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for Monday, February 14, 2022 at 7:00 o’clock p.m., as a virtual meeting and in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado if allowed to meet in person on that date per COVID-19 restrictions, and that it takes effect 15 days after final publication. READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of _____ to _____, this _____ day of ___________, 2022. SIGNED by the Mayor on this _______ day of _______________, 2022. ______________________________________ Bud Starker, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________________ Stephen Kirkpatrick, City Clerk Approved as to Form _______________________________________ Gerald Dahl, City Attorney 1st publication: January 13, 2022 2nd publication: Jeffco Transcript: Effective Date: Planning Commission 1 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT REVIEW DATES: December 16, 2021 (Planning Commission) / February 14, 2022 (City Council) CASE MANAGER: Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner CASE NO. & NAME: WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of a zone change from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) LOCATION OF REQUEST: 9605 W. 38th Ave. APPLICANT / OWNER: Jacob Hill APPROXIMATE AREA: 21,065 square feet (0.48 acres) PRESENT ZONING: Residential-One COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Neighborhood ENTER INTO RECORD: (X)CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X)COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (X)ZONING ORDINANCE (X)DIGITAL PRESENTATION Location Map Site ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Commission 2 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone JURISDICTION: All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. I. REQUEST The owner of 9605 W. 38th Avenue has submitted an application requesting approval of a zone change from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) on their property. The zone change is the first step of the process for the property to potentially be utilized for two single- family homes. If the zone change is approved, the applicant plans to submit a subdivision to split the property from one lot to two. The goal of the zone change and subsequent subdivision is to create two buildable parcels for single-family homes (Exhibit 1, Applicant Letter). II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The property is located at the northeast corner of W. 38th Avenue and Independence Court and is an oversized corner lot. An Improvement Survey Plat submitted by the applicant shows the property is almost twice the minimum size for R-1, measuring 21,065 square feet (0.48 acres) in size. The lot width parallel to W. 38th Avenue is 140 feet and the lot width parallel to Independence Court is 150 feet. The site is currently vacant land; the site used to contain a single-family house that was demolished in 2020. According to the Jefferson County Assessor, the home had originally been constructed in 1898, was 1,020 square feet in size, and was listed in fair condition. The site has roughly 15 feet of fall from the south end of the property to the north end. The property is currently zoned Residential-One (R-1). The surrounding properties are also zoned R-1 and Residential-Two (R-2). There is a pocket of Residential-Two A (R-2A) zoning to the southwest. Most of the surrounding uses are single-family and duplex residential uses. The W. 38th Avenue and Kipling Street major commercial intersection is about two blocks to the west. III. PROPOSED ZONING The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B). Both zone districts are intended to provide high quality, safe, quiet and stable low-density residential neighborhoods. Both zone districts allow only single-family home development—duplexes and multifamily are not permitted. The subject property is too small in either zone district to allow any of the nonresidential uses contemplated by the zoning (churches, schools, government buildings, and group homes). The applicant is requesting the zone change to R-1B so they can subdivide the oversized parcel and build two single-family homes. Surrounding zoning is predominantly R-1 and R-2 with a pocket of R- 2A to the southwest, and surrounding land uses are mostly single-family homes and duplexes. While R-1B is not located in the area, the single-family zone district is consistent with the surrounding area and would not result in significant change to the area. The applicant desires to rezone in order to provide the opportunity to build two homes that are proportional to the lots and more affordable. The following table compares the existing and proposed zoning for the property, with standards for new development or major additions. Planning Commission 3 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone Development Standard CURRENT ZONING Residential-One (R-1) PROPOSED ZONING Residential-One B (R-1B) Uses Allows for single family homes. Also allows for churches, schools, and government buildings. Allows for single-family homes. Also allows for churches, schools, and government buildings. Architectural Standards None None Max. Building Height 35’ 35’ Min. Lot area 12,500 sq. ft. 7,500 sq. ft. Min. Lot width 100’ 60’ Max. Lot coverage 25% 40% Setbacks Front / street facing Rear setback Side setbacks 30’ 15’ 15’ 25’ 10’ 5’ min. on one side, 15’ total When reviewing the site, staff determined that R-1B is the most suitable zoning for the applicant’s proposal after considering several alternatives: • The property is 3,935 square feet shy of being able to create a 2-lot subdivision under R-1 which requires 12,500 square feet per lot. Variances for new subdivisions are not typically supported for lot width or lot area. • The other predominant zoning in the area is R-2, but this was eliminated for two reasons. While the property has the lot area to create two single-family lots in R-2, the corner lot condition requires 80 feet of width along both streets and thus would require a lot width variance to create two-single family homes. Further, R-2 allows for the potential of a duplex on a street which is otherwise predominantly single-family homes, so R-2 was not recommended. R-1B was determined to be the most appropriate option because it retains the single-family character of the area and no variances would be necessary to accommodate future development. In a subdivided condition, it would result in two lots which are compatible in size with surrounding conditions. With over 20,000 square feet to work with, the subject property could accommodate two single-family lots that far exceed the minimum lot area requirement of R-1B. If subdivided, the new lot sizes would fall between R-1 and R-2: the lots would be about 15% smaller than that required of R-1 (12,500 sf minimum) and consistent with the size of a single-family home in R-2 (9,000 sf minimum). IV. ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria outlined in Section 26-112.E. The Planning Commission and City Council shall base its decision in consideration of the extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The change of zone promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. The zone change will not result in adverse effects on the surrounding area. The rezoning would allow for one additional single-family dwelling unit compared with what is allowed under R-1, and Planning Commission 4 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone this would be consistent with adjacent land uses. R-2 zoning and duplexes reside in close proximity, which allows for higher densities. The oversized corner lot, if subdivided, would result in lots that are comparable in size to the surrounding R-2 lots. Staff expects no significant adverse effects on the surrounding area. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 2. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the types of uses allowed by the change of zone, or the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist or are under capacity. All responding agencies have indicated they can serve the property. In the event that the current utility capacity is not adequate, the property owner/developer will be responsible for utility upgrades. A building permit will be required for any construction on the property, and fire and building codes are required to be met. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. 3. The Planning Commission shall also find that at least one (1) of the following conditions exists: a. The change of zone is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for the area. Envision Wheat Ridge, the City’s comprehensive plan, identifies this area as a Neighborhood (Exhibit 4, Comprehensive Plan). This designation identifies areas where residents of all ages can live safely and comfortably. Defining characteristics of an established neighborhood in the comprehensive plan are: consistent character, mature landscaping, high rates of reinvestment and home ownership, consistent maintenance, and high desirability. City goals that are met with the rezoning proposal include encouraging reinvestment in a property, maintaining consistent character, and creating opportunities for home ownership. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. b. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is in error. Staff has not found any evidence of an error with the current R-1 zoning designation as it appears on the City zoning maps. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. c. A change of character in the area has occurred or is occurring to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changing character of the area. Staff finds no evidence of significant changes in the area. The zone change request from R-1 to R-1B neither responds to nor results in notable change of character. Planning Commission 5 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. d. The proposed rezoning is necessary in order to provide for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan. The proposed rezoning does not relate to an unanticipated community need. Staff concludes that this criterion is not applicable. Staff concludes that the criteria used to evaluate zone change support this request. V. PUBLIC NOTICING Prior to submittal of an application for a zone change, the applicant is required to hold a neighborhood input meeting in accordance with the requirements of Section 26-109. A meeting for neighborhood input was held on August 19, 2021. This meeting was advertised and conducted as a virtual meeting on Zoom. Nine members of the public attended the virtual meeting in addition to the applicant and staff (see Exhibit 4, Neighborhood Meeting Notes). As of the date of distribution of this staff report, November 5, 2021, the City has not received additional comments or inquiries from surrounding property owners. VI. AGENCY REFERRAL All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the zone change request and regarding the ability to serve the property. Specific referral responses follow: Wheat Ridge Engineering Division: No comments. If future development occurs, comments will be provided at time of plat for this site. West Metro Fire Protection District: No objections. Xcel Energy: No comments received. Century Link: No comments received. Comcast Cable: No comments received. What Ridge Water District: No comments received. Westridge Sanitation District: No objections. VII. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff concludes that the proposed zone change promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the community and will not result in a significant adverse effect on the surrounding area. Staff further Planning Commission 6 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone concludes that utility infrastructure adequately serves the property, and the applicant will be responsible for upgrades, if needed in the future. Finally, staff concludes that the zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Because the zone change evaluation criteria support the zone change request, staff recommends approval of Case No. WZ-21-12. VIII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS Option A: “I move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-21-12, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) for property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. The proposed zone change will promote the public health, safety, or welfare of the community and does not result in an adverse effect on the surrounding area. 2. Utility infrastructure adequately services the property. 3. The proposed zone change is consistent with the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan and consistent with the character of W. 38th Avenue. 4. The zone change will provide additional opportunity for reinvestment in the area. 5. The criteria used to evaluate a zone change supports the request.” Option B: “I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-21-12, a request for approval of a zone change from Residential-One (R-1) to Residential-One B (R-1B) for property located at 9605 W. 38th Avenue, for the following reasons: 1. 2. …” Planning Commission 7 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL Planning Commission 8 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP Planning Commission 9 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone Written request and description of the proposal • The need for the zone change. We would like to change the zoning for 9605 W 38th Ave from R-1 to R-1B. With R-1B, we will have the opportunity to split the lot into two separate, equally sized lots just under 12,000 sqft each. This will allow us to build one single-family home of appropriate and proportional size to the lot. • Present and future effect on the existing zone districts, development and physical character of the area. If granted the opportunity to re-zone and subdivide the lot, the separation would be from east to west. This allows the access to each lot to come off of Independence Ct., which would be safer as W 38th is a highly trafficked road. Our proposal to re-zone and subdivide the lot creates an opportunity to build two appropriately sized homes, fenced with yards and beautiful landscaping. We believe it will compliment the physical character of the area. • Access to the area, traffic patterns and impact of the requested zone on these factors. • Availability of utilities. With re-zoning lot 9605 W 38th and possibly subdividing the lot into two, each access point to each lot would then come off of Independence Ct. Right now, the lot has access off of Independence Ct., as well as W 38th. We would close the access off of W 38th and repair the sidewalk, thus reducing disruptions to traffic on W 38th. All utilities enter the lot at the South East corner making them easily accessible for the current lot and could also be ran for a potential second lot easily. • Present and future effect on public facilities and services, such as fire, police, water, sanitation, roadways, parks, schools, etc. We believe re-zoning 9605 W 38th and potentially subdividing the lot into two equal lots of 10,532 sqft will not affect public facilities and services. The newly subdivided lot sizes will be either as large or smaller than some of the surrounding lots – some of which currently have multiple units on them. By keeping 9605 W 38th as two single-family homes, and not multiple duplexes, we believe it won’t overcrowd the lots or the surrounding area. Therefore, not drastically affecting the water, sanitation, roadways, parks or schools. • A discussion of the relationship between the proposal and adopted land and/or policies of the city The proposed re-zoning will provide the opportunity to build a smaller home, proportional to the lot that is more affordable. This will allow the potential for two single-family homes, while respecting all neighbors and setbacks, as well as maintaining a landscape with plenty of room for yards and driveways. EXHIBIT 3: APPLICANT LETTER Planning Commission 10 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone EXHIBIT 4: NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING Planning Commission 11 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone Planning Commission 12 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone The following in an excerpt from the Structure Map within the Comprehensive Plan. EXHIBIT 5: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Subject Property Planning Commission 13 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone EXHIBIT 6: SITE PHOTOS View of the subject property looking north from W. 38th Avenue. Note, the house has been demolished. (Source: Google Maps November 2021) View of the subject property looking northwest from the intersection of W. 38th Avenue and Independence Court. Note, the house has been demolished. (Source: Google Maps November 2021) Planning Commission 14 Case No. WZ-21-12 / 9605 W. 38th Ave. Rezone View of the subject property looking south from Independence Court. Note, the house has been demolished. (Source: Google Maps November 2021) .. � � .( ... .,. City of ?WheatRi._,dge PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting December 16, 2021 1.CALL THE MEETING TO ORDERThe meeting was called to order by Chair LARSON at 7:02 p.m. This meeting was heldin person and virtually, using Zoom video-teleconferencing technology. As dulyannounced and publicly noticed, the City previously approved this meeting format inorder to continue with normal business amid the COVID-19 pandemic and the relatedpublic emergency orders promulgated by the State of Colorado and the Wheat Ridge CityCouncil. Before calling the meeting to order, the Chair stated the rules and proceduresnecessitated by this virtual meeting format.2.ROLL CALL OF MEMBERSCommission Members Present:Commission Members Absent: Staff Members Present: 3.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Melissa Antol Kristine Disney Will Kerns Daniel Larson Janet Leo Jahi Simbai Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager Stephanie Stevens, Senior Planner Scott Cutler, Senior Planner Rocky Macsalka, Civil Engineer II Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary 4.APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner DISNEY and seconded by Commissioner LEO toapprove the order of the agenda. Motion carried 5-0. 5.APPROVAL OF MINUTES -November 18, 2021Planning Commission Minutes December 16, 2021 - 1 - ATTACHMENT 3 From:Zoning Division To:Stephanie Stevens Subject:Fw: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Date:Friday, November 12, 2021 11:46:12 AM Attachments:image001.png From: Allison Lewis Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 11:26 AM To: Zoning Division Subject: FW: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Please see the service request below. Thank you, Allison Lewis Pronouns: she/her Administrative Specialist Office Phone: 303.235.2815 From: no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us <no-reply@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 11:21 AM To: Allison Lewis <ALewis@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Service Request Service Request To submit a WRPD complaint or commendation, please visit our Community Input Form: Community Input Form Requests for service will be responded to within 48 hours of receipt of the request during normal business hours, M-F, 8am-5pm. Service requests submitted ATTACHMENT 4 outside of normal business hours will be responded to within 48 hours of the first business day. First Name:Pearllynne Last Name:Minkler Requestor Address Line 1:4000 Independence Ct Requestor Address Line 2:Field not completed. City:Wheat Riddge State:CO Zip Code:80033 Phone:30380170-2 Alt Phone:Field not completed. Email:Pearie1@msn.com Location of Request 9605 w 38th ave Subject Rezoning objection About Service Request:We do mot want the zoning changed to this property listed above due to traffic problems when the school gets out. We are trapped Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. From:Zoning Division To:Stephanie Stevens Subject:Fw: Case No WZ-21-12 Date:Monday, November 15, 2021 10:01:08 AM Hi Stephanie, From the hotline... Tammy From: Larry Mathews <Larry_Mathews@msn.com> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 9:04 AM To: Zoning Division Cc: Larry Mathews Subject: Case No WZ-21-12 I, Carol Anne Mathews owner of property located at 3851 Hoyt Street, Wheat Ridge , Colorado 80033, Hereby protest against the proposed property change from R-1 to R-1B zoning of the property at 9605 West 38th Ave, Wheat Ridge Colorado 80033. I contend that the increased density of this rezoning is not compatible or appropriate for this neighborhood. Carol Anne Mathews November 11, 2021 303-420-8753 Larry_Mathews@msn.com From:b smith To:Stephanie Stevens Subject:WZ-21-12/ 9605 W. 38thAve. Rezone - Comment Date:Thursday, December 16, 2021 9:12:38 AM Ms. Stevens, I attempted to make a comment via Wheat Ridge Speaks, but the comments closed yesterday at 12:00pm. Consider this a public comment to be recorded for the project and public hearing. This project is not supported. by this resident. Despite what the planning staff may say orrecommend, rezoning this lot will provide no benefit to the immediate neighborhood, nor the community at large. The sole beneficiaries would be the applicants planning to develop theproperty. As noted in the staff report the site is located on 38th Avenue, which is a busy street. What the report fails to mention is Independence also has intermittent high traffic volume from themiddle school. The street in general has minimal street parking and the subject property in particular has no available street parking along its frontages. Rezoning to allow an additionalresidence will exacerbate a situation of limited parking if only the minimum off street parking requirements are met. This will create an inconvenience and possible nuisance for residentswho already live here. Access to the site, parking, and traffic are the primary concerns in rezoning this property. The physical constraints are just not conducive to allowing two houses without inconvenience toneighbors. Further statements regarding nearby R2 zoning in the staff report are irrelevant distractions to the fact that the planning staff are recommending a zone change from R1, which mostsurrounding properties are the same, and should remain so. There are plenty of existing properties to redevelop for increased density. It is a mistake to reduce the existing R1 zonesfor the sole benefit of a developer. Whether their stated intention is personal, or commercial. Information available about the applicants indicates the latter and that should be considered byall who have a voice in this proposed change. I for one am fed up with Wheat Ridge accommodating every request from outside developers and investors when it results in adverse change or inconvenience to long term and currentresidents. If the City's goals are to improve housing, efforts should be focused on the improvement of existing denser multifamily areas for long term investment and stability of thecity and move away from such a large percentage of temporary, short term, and transient population. ITEM NO: 3 DATE: February 14, 2022 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO ACCEPT GRANTS FROM THE STATE OF COLORADO HIGHWAY SAFETY OFFICE IN THE AMOUNT OF $44,359 TO PROVIDE EDUCATION, OUTREACH AND ENFORCEMENT FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _______________________________ ______________________________ Chief of Police City Manager ISSUE: The Colorado Highway Safety Office (HSO) has awarded two grants to the Wheat Ridge Police Department (WRPD) for law enforcement purposes. The first grant is in the amount of $19,359 and is for the purposes of traffic safety. The second grant is in the amount of $25,000 and is for the purposes of pedestrian safety. The HSO requires City Council to officially accept these grants. PRIOR ACTION: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: These grant funds have already been appropriated in the 2022 budget. BACKGROUND: The Colorado Department of Transportation 2021 Problem Identification Report indicates that pedestrian fatalities rose 24% from 2015 to 2019. It is noteworthy that overall fatalities rose 9% during that same period. From 2015 to 2018, there were 182 traffic fatalities in Jefferson County and approximately 21% involved pedestrian fatalities. The City of Wheat Ridge had one fatal auto vs. pedestrian crash between 2015 and 2019 and had four in 2020. Auto vs. pedestrian crashes accounted for 57% of the fatal crashes in Wheat Ridge in 2020. This coincided with a dramatic increase in accidents requiring an after-hours response due to the severity of accidents occurring in the city. Wheat Ridge has experienced a significant increase in persons experiencing homelessness, and many of the auto vs. pedestrian crashes involve persons experiencing homelessness. For the Pedestrian Safety Grant, the WRPD will focus on reducing pedestrian-related traffic injuries and fatalities through a combination of education, outreach and enforcement. Enforcement will be conducted primarily on bicycles. WRPD will conduct high visibility enforcement in high accident areas in an effort to address these issues. Areas of focus will include (but not be limited to) speeding, distracted driving, and aggressive driving. We will also coordinate with our PIO and use sign boards in order to educate the public on traffic safety. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that Council accept the HSO funds to provide education, outreach, and enforcement for traffic and pedestrian safety. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to accept grants from the State of Colorado Highway Safety Office in the amount of $44,359 to provide education, outreach, and enforcement for traffic and pedestrian safety.” Or, “I move to not accept grants from the State of Colorado Highway Safety Office in the amount of $44,359 to provide education, outreach, and enforcement for traffic and pedestrian safety for the following reason(s) _________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Chris Krieger, Crash and Traffic Team Sergeant Jim Lorentz, Division Chief Chris Murtha, Police Chief Patrick Goff, City Manager ITEM NO: 4 DATE: February 14, 2022 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO AMEND AND EXTEND THE CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO, FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022, IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,778,778 AND APPROVE PAYMENTS FOR ONGOING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR THE INVESTING 4 THE FUTURE PROGRAM PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING BIDS/MOTIONS ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: YES NO _____________________________ Director Public Works City Manager ISSUE: On January 27, 2017, the firm AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) was selected by the City’s established procurement process to provide multi-year professional engineering and land use planning services for the 2E Bond Fund, “Investing 4 the Future”, projects and to serve as an extension of staff as needed for review and assistance in the delivery of private related development, in the Clear Creek Crossing and Wheat Ridge · Ward Station areas and more particularly now for the Wadsworth Blvd Improvement project. The scope and related fees for AECOM services in 2022 have been negotiated and City Council action is requested for the approval of the AECOM contract amendment and extension. PRIOR ACTION: The initial AECOM contract was approved by Council on November 27, 2017, for the period of December 1, 2017 – December 31, 2018. On January 28, 2019, an amendment to AECOM’s contract was approved by City Council, for professional services for the period of January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. On February 24, 2020, Council awarded contract extension to AECOM for the period of January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, to continue ongoing program Council Action Form – AECOM Contract Extension February 14, 2022 Page 2 management services for the Investing 4 the Future program. At the December 7, 2020, Council Study Session, Staff and AECOM representatives presented scope of work and estimated construction management costs for the Wadsworth Blvd Widening Project, which began construction in November 2021. On February 8, 2021, Council awarded contract extension to AECOM for the period of January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021, to continue ongoing program management services for the Investing 4 the Future program. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding in the amount of $1,778,778 for this contract amendment and extension is budgeted in the 2022 2E Bond Fund and the Capital Improvement Program Fund budgets. Task orders will be issued for each of the tasks. Services will be billed on an hourly basis, and only for the services completed. BACKGROUND: The City of Wheat Ridge required professional services assistance for moving forward with the following Investing 4 the Future projects: Construction of relocated west bound on/off ramps on Interstate 70 for the Clear Creek Crossing mixed use development, widening of Wadsworth Boulevard to 6-lanes and transforming it into an attractive multi-modal corridor, and improvements to public infrastructure and amenities in support of economic development at the Wheat Ridge · Ward Station area. More information on all the Investing 4 the Future projects can be found at the following link: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/investing4thefuture Because of the complexity and magnitude of this activity, the services of an outside consulting firm were needed to provide an extension of staff. It was expected that professional services would be needed over at least 4 years, depending on the timing of development and activity in the respective project areas. The consultant retained by the City serves as an extension of staff to ensure that public and private improvement plans are submitted and eventually constructed per requirements. This required the consultant to engage a multi-disciplinary team that would be available as needed (up to full-time) and potentially on short notice. Project descriptions and the expected services needed are as follows: Clear Creek Crossing: All infrastructure design and construction work on Clear Creek Crossing and the I-70 Interchange is substantially complete with the exception of contract closeout activities. Services Required: 1. Assist with preparation of project punch list of uncompleted work, non-conformance reports and deficiency notices. 2. Participate in project close-out activities, final walk-through and tracking of punch list items. 3. Review final documentation to be provided by Mortensen Construction, including as- constructed plans, final quantities, certificates of compliance, material and other quality control/quality assurance documentation. 4. Prepare final documentation as required in CDOT’s construction manual. Sign-off as Engineer in Responsible Charge and request letter of acceptance from CDOT. Council Action Form – AECOM Contract Extension February 14, 2022 Page 3 Wadsworth Boulevard Widening: In 2014, the City received a TIP grant from DRCOG for federal transportation funds, available for fiscal years 2016 through 2021, to help fund a widening and improvement project on Wadsworth Boulevard from 35th Avenue to the eastbound I-70 ramps. With an earlier grant, a PEL study was completed and approved by Council in 2016. That study identified traffic congestion and safety issues, developed multi-modal solutions, and identified related environmental issues and mitigation measures that needed further assessment. The PEL study identified the improvements needed to widen Wadsworth Boulevard to six travel lanes (including improvements at the major intersections at 38th and 44th Avenues), provide additional turn lanes at key congested intersections, and to install medians to better manage access. Bicycle and pedestrian facilities were also included to provide service for additional modes of transportation. Construction officially commenced in November 2021 for the estimated 2-year long project, beginning with site clearing and grubbing, placement of asphalt shift lanes, removal of concrete medians in Wadsworth Blvd. and initial re-locations of water and sanitary sewer services. Services Required: 1. Management and review of the project construction in accordance with the requirements of the City and applicable State and Federal agencies, including utility identification and coordination, construction plans and specifications, right-of-way plans, easements, permits, and other legal documents. 2. Construction project management and inspection in accordance with requirements of the City and applicable State and Federal agencies. 3. Assistance in coordinating public and private improvements that may occur simultaneously in the corridor. 4. Coordination of public information and assistance to the City with updates as often as needed for the traveling public, adjacent landowners, businesses, nearby residents, and other stakeholders. 5. Coordination with other agencies and stakeholders, including RTD, CDOT, and public and private utilities. Wheat Ridge · Ward Station Area: The City will address traffic growth and facilitate redevelopment and economic development opportunities in the area surrounding the G Line commuter rail station at 52nd Avenue and Ward Road. Improvements scheduled for completion in 2022 are the reconstruction of the Ward Road/Ridge Road and Ward Road/52nd Avenue intersections. Services Required: 1. Construction management and review of the project in accordance with the requirements of the City and applicable State and Federal agencies, including utility identification and coordination, construction plans and specifications, right-of-way plans, easements, permits, and other legal documents. Council Action Form – AECOM Contract Extension February 14, 2022 Page 4 2. Construction project management and inspection in accordance with requirements of the City and applicable State and Federal agencies. 3. Assistance in coordinating public and private improvements that may occur on the project. 4. Coordination of public information and assistance to the City with updates as often as needed for the traveling public, adjacent landowners, businesses, nearby residents, and other stakeholders. 5. Coordination with other agencies and stakeholders, public and private utilities. RECOMMENDATIONS: To date, AECOM has performed very well on all the tasks assigned to them. Staff has been very pleased with their performance, professionalism, timeliness, and cost effectiveness. Appropriate fees for the work have been negotiated in accordance with the specific tasks and services needed. Staff will authorize work to AECOM as specific task orders. Staff recommends amending and extending the AECOM 2E Professional Services Contract term and fees in the amount of $1,778,778 for the expected work to be completed in 2022. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move to amend and extend the contract for professional services to AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Greenwood Village, CO, for fiscal year 2022, in an amount not to exceed $1,778,778 and approve payments for ongoing program management services for the Investing 4 the Future program.” Or: “I move to deny the amendment and extension of the contract for professional services to AECOM Technical Services, Inc., Greenwood Village, CO, for fiscal year 2022, in an amount not to exceed $1,778,778 and approve payments for ongoing program management services for the Investing 4 the Future program for the following reason(s) _________________________________.” REPORT PREPARED/REVIEWED BY: Greg Knudson, Director of Public Works Whitney Mugford-Smith, Procurement Manager Patrick Goff, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: 1. AECOM 2022 Scope of Services 2. Workhour/Cost Summary – January 30, 2022 City of Wheat Ridge Investing 4 the Future Program Management Services AECOM Contract Continuation 2022 Scope of Services Final – January 19, 2022 1 A.PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND CONTINUING SERVICES AECOM will provide ongoing program management services for the City’s Investing 4 the Future Program. The Scope of Services covers the extended phase of the Program from January 1 through December 31, 2022 for a duration of 12 months. The Program Management activities will be led by AECOM’s Project Manager, Chad Phillips, and will be supported by the project controls and administrative support team. The Scope includes the following program management activities: Activity A.1 Project Initiation (N/A) These activities were substantially completed under the initial phase of the contract and are not included in the Scope of Services Activity A.2 Project Management This activity includes ongoing project management activities necessary to administer and manage the program including the following: a)Project Coordination: Routine management and coordination activities b)Schedule and Document Control (Not included in the Scope of Services) c)Cost and Risk Management (Not included in the Scope of Services)) d)Invoicing/Monthly Reporting: Routine monitoring and maintenance of project budgets and administration of each of the City projects (not including Anderson Park). Preparation of monthly invoices including monthly progress report including project status narrative, cost, schedule and budget update. Any “Non-2E” Bond Program costs shall be tracked separately, if applicable Activity A.3 Meetings/Communications Monthly 2E City staff meetings and/or other project management meetings are not anticipated and are not included in the Scope of Services Activity A.4 Rapid Response (Unforeseen Services) Not included in the Scope of Services B.CLEAR CREEK CROSSING All infrastructure design and construction work on Clear Creek Crossing and the I-70 Interchange is substantially complete with the exception of contract closeout activities. The Scope of Services includes the following activities: ATTACHMENT 1 City of Wheat Ridge Investing 4 the Future Program Management Services AECOM Contract Continuation 2022 Scope of Services Final – January 19, 0222 2 Activity B.3 Construction Management Support a)Contract Closeout Assist with preparation of punch list of uncompleted work, non-conformance reports, and deficiency notices. Participate in project close-out activities, final walk-through and tracking of punch-list items Review final documentation to be provided by Mortenson Construction including as- constructed plans, final quantities, certificates of compliance, materials and other QC/QA documentation Prepare final documentation as required in CDOT’s construction manual. Sign-off as Engineer in Responsible Charge and request letter of acceptance from CDOT. C.WADSWORTH IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Activity C.1 Design Review Support Not included in the Scope of Services Activity C.2 Funding Support Not included in the Scope of Services Activity C.3 Construction Management The AECOM Team will provide construction management and materials QA services for the Wadsworth Improvements Project and provide full construction contract administration, project management, inspection, CDOT documentation and public communications in accordance with the CDOT Local Agency policies. The AECOM Team includes the following subconsultants: AECOM will lead the project team and will provide overall construction management of the Project Benesch will provide CM support and construction oversight services Geocal will provide materials testing and QC services Merge Resource Group will be responsible for public communications services Terracon All work will be in accordance with City and CDOT requirements as designated on the plans for the project. Chad Phillips (AECOM) will serve as the Engineer in Responsible Charge. The anticipated time period required for the work described in this scope is from January through December 2022. Work may be required night or day, on weekends, holidays, or on a split shift basis. Work week may be in excess of or less than the standard 40-hour week. Authorization by the City must be received prior to proceeding with overtime, nighttime or weekend work. Initial project planning meetings and site inspection may also be required prior to the construction contractor’s NTP. The Scope of Services includes 12 months duration for the staffing listed below. Reductions in staffing may occur during no work periods during the winter months. The actual duration of the project will be dictated by the construction contractor and is City of Wheat Ridge Investing 4 the Future Program Management Services AECOM Contract Continuation 2022 Scope of Services Final – January 19, 0222 3 anticipated to go into 2023. Requirements for CM staffing beyond December 2022 will be negotiated with the City as part of a future Scope of Services. Services for the Construction Project Manager are estimated at 40 hours/week. Services for the inspectors are estimated at 45 hours/week. Hours required and approved beyond these estimates, or contractor’s failure to complete work within the contract time allowed could be cause to exceed these estimates and show the need for supplemental budget. The AECOM Team shall furnish personnel, vehicles, cell phones, computer, printer and standard office software, and miscellaneous equipment required to perform the work. A Field Office will need to be provided for the shared use of the entire CM Team. That cost is not included in this scope. General Work Description: The AECOM Team will provide support to the City through assignment of personnel for construction management, inspection, and IAT testing and shall be responsible for the following activities: Provide construction contract administration activities – management, inspection, documentation Project Documentation - Maintain a daily diary for each day work is performed on the project. The contents of the diary shall be brief and accurate statements of progress and conditions encountered during the prosecution of the work. Prepare and compile interim and final inspection reports as required in the CDOT construction manual. Review, give comments, and acknowledge completeness of required submittal resulting from but not limited to: o Method of Handling Traffic o Progress Schedule o Shop Drawings Preparation of the following documentation, reports and billing on a routine basis: o Periodic reports and billings o Preparation of monthly progress Invoices for monthly and final billings for AECOM/Benesch fees and construction contractor payments o Project files, project diaries and time counts o Conduct and document weekly progress meeting with City, Contractor, subcontractors, utilities and other interested parties o Monitoring of project contractor for fulfillment of contract plans and specifications o Securing all project documentation from the contractor Anticipating project problems and direct solutions to the City Project Representative. Prepare and track responses to contractors' and suppliers' request for information, submittals, change notices, claims, and correspondence. Prepare cost estimates and change orders as necessary. Review of drawings and data submitted by the construction contractor and suppliers for general conformance with the intent of the specifications. Inform and obtain concurrence as needed from the City Project Representative and keep relative documentation for project records. Review and approval of Methods of Handling Traffic (MHT). City of Wheat Ridge Investing 4 the Future Program Management Services AECOM Contract Continuation 2022 Scope of Services Final – January 19, 0222 4 Monitoring compliance with and taking appropriate action to preserve safety on the project for all workers and traveling public in accordance with Method of Handling Traffic (MHT). Conduct required stormwater management inspections and monitor contractor’s compliance. Assist with preparation of punch list of uncompleted work, non-conformance reports, and deficiency notices. Prepare all Final documentation as required in CDOT’s construction manual and CDOT Local Agency requirements. Construction Management Oversight: This work will be for oversight of the team and providing the Engineer in Responsible Charge for the project. Pre-Construction Preparation: Preconstruction setup, submittal review, and other activities will need to the completed prior to the Contractor beginning work. The staffing for the project includes the following: a)Construction Project Manager: Chad Phillips will serve as Construction Project Manager and Engineer in Responsible Charge b)Assistant Project Engineer: This person will assist the Project Manager on duties of administration of the project both office and field tasks as assigned. This person will be capable of serving as the Project Engineer in accordance with CDOT requirements. c)Inspection Staff: Two (2) inspectors are anticipated to be in the field full time for the efforts on the project. One senior level and one junior level inspector are being proposed for the scope of work. These people will inspect and record field activities, quantities, and other duties as assigned by the Project Engineer and Assistant Project Engineer. In addition, one junior inspector will be assigned to the project during the summer months to assist with routine inspection duties during the peak construction deason d)Testing: One (1) FTE is anticipated for materials testing duties in 2022. e)Public Communications Manager: Kate Binning will serve in this role. Level of effort is anticipated to average less than one-half FTE over the project duration D.ANDERSON PARK The Anderson Park Project is complete and is not included in the Scope of Services. E.WHEAT RIDGE WARD STATION AREA Activity E.1 Project Management Not included in the Scope of Services Activity E.2 Station Area Analysis Not included in the Scope of Services City of Wheat Ridge Investing 4 the Future Program Management Services AECOM Contract Continuation 2022 Scope of Services Final – January 19, 0222 5 Activity E.3 Design Review Support Ward Station – Plaza, Pedestrian Bridge, Trail The Scope of Work includes supporting the City staff with design reviews of PSE submittal packages at the 60%, 90% and 100% submittal stages for the Ward Station Plaza, Pedestrian Bridge and Trail. It is our understanding that the submittal packages will be prepared by SEH consulting engineers. Review of the 30% design submittal was completed in January of 2020. Design reviews are not intended to be a detail check for quality control but a review of the submittal documents for conformance with Wheat Ridge city standards, ADA and other applicable design standards and codes. Reviews will include general site-civil engineering, drainage, structural, landscaping, irrigation, lighting and mechanic/electrical/ plumbing (MEP) design elements. We anticipate that the design submittals will include plans, specifications, cost estimates, reports and other deliverables. Review comments will be compiled in spreadsheet format along with “redline” plan revisions where applicable. Activity E.4 Development Review Support Not included in the Scope of Services Activity E.5 Funding Support Not included in the Scope of Services Activity E.6 Construction Management Ward Road/Ridge Road and Ward Road/52nd Ave. Intersections The AECOM Team will provide construction management and materials QA services for the Ward Road/Ridge Road and Ward Road/52nd Ave. Intersection Project and provide full construction contract administration, project management, inspection, CDOT documentation and public communications in accordance with the CDOT Local Agency policies. It is our understanding that these two intersection projects will be packaged with the Tabor, 52nd and Ridge Road Street reconstruction project. Construction management of the street reconstruction project will be managed by the City and is not included in the Scope of Services. The Ward Road intersection projects will require coordination with CDOT and CDOT QC/QA documentation. The staffing for the project includes the following: a)Construction Project Engineer: Assume 25% level of effort for a duration of 10 weeks b)Assistant Project Engineer: Assume one FTE for duration of 10 weeks Wheat Ridge Investing 4 the Future Program Management/Construction Management Workhour/Cost Estimate 2022 FINAL 1/19/22 Workhour/Cost Summary Task No. Total Hours Total Cost A 424 49,038$Labor 5,639$Fee (11.5%) 250$ODC's/Subcontractor 54,927$ B 160 24,262$Labor 2,790$Fee (11.5%) 250$ODC's/Subcontractor 27,302$Total Cost C 13198 1,312,569$Labor 94,125$Fee (11.5%) 90,659$ODC's/Subcontractor 1,573,684$Total Cost D 0 -$ Labor -$ Total Cost E 806 107,053$Labor 12,311$Fee (11.5%) 3,500$ODC's/Subcontractor 122,864$Total Cost 14588 1,778,778$PROJECT TOTALS Subtotal - Program Management Continuing Requirements Subtotal - Clear Creek Crossing Subtotal - Ward Road Station Subtotal - Wadsworth Widening Subtotal - Anderson Park Page 1 of 1 ATTACHMENT 2