Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
WSP-16-07
.. City ofWheat Nge w COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Case file for Case No.0/ S Q. Ill· 0 + /West End 38 Lauren Mikulak, Planning Manager DVW January 2,2018 Processing of Cases WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02, WCP-16-04, MS-16-08 The following four cases were processed concurrently for the West End 38 mixed use redevelopment project at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street. Document Case #Approval Date Reception # Site Plan WSP-16-07 6/29/17 .NA Conditional Use Permit CUP-16-02 6/28/17 NA Concept Plan WCP-16-04 6/29/17 2017068513 Plat MS-16-08 6/29/17 2017068509 SIA . NA 6/29/17 2017068510 This project also included TIF financing with a Redevelopment Agreement executed by the Urban Renewal Authority (URA) and the developer and a Cooperation Agreement executed by the City and URA. All files for these four related cases may be found in the case file for Case No. WSP-16-07. Approvals/ Final Docs C ity of 7500 West 29th Avenue391 Wheatilidge Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Ph 303.235.2846 Fax 303.235.2857 Approval of Site Plan The West End 38 Site Plan provides for mixed use redevelopment on property located at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street (Case No. WSP-16-07 / West End 38). The Site Plan is hereby approved for the following reasons: 1. The site plan complies with zoning regulations in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 2. The streetscape designs are in substantial compliance with the applicable standards of the Streetscape Design Manual. 3. The site plan is in conformance with the approved West End 38 Concept Plan, recorded under reception number 20/9-0Ip,FS / 3 with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder. and with the following conditions: 1. Fees-in-liue of parkland dedication in the amount of $ 2,021.62 per residential unit shall be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 2. The developer shall be responsible for required utility upgrades. This includes upgrades to the sanitary sewer system, including payment of required fees and the installation of approximately 630 linear feet of 8" pipe in W. 44th Avenue per District standards 44 \VL,u 4 k/-Nilkenne?Mthnstone, KICP Date Community Developent Director A A k. - , City of 7500 West 29th Avenue 79 Wheat Kidge Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Ph 303.235.2846 Fax 303.235.2857 Approval of Conditional Use Permit WHEREAS, an application for a Conditional Use Permit was submitted for property located at 7391 W. 38th Avenue to allow for reconstruction of Vectra Bank with drive-up lanes in the Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) zone district, referenced as Case No. CUP-16-02; and WHEREAS, City staff found basis for approval of the Conditional Use Permit, relying on criteria listed in Section 26-1118 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws and on information submitted in the case file; and WHEREAS, the application has been through the standard agency referral and all utilities can serve the property and proposed use; NOW THEREFORE, be it hereby resolved that a Conditional Use Permit to allow reconstruction of Vectra Bank with drive-up lanes on property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) pursuant to Case No. CUP-16-02, is granted based on the following findings of fact: 1. The proposed use is consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. 2. The proposed use is compatible with the adjacent land uses in terms of scale, site design, and operating characteristics. 3. The operations of the drive-up lanes are appropriately designed to mitigate potential impacts. 4. The design and capacity of adjacent roadways and access easements can handle the anticipated traffic. 5. The site design, architecture, and landscaping of the site mitigate potential impacts/ 6. The CUP review criteria support approval ofthis request. 7. All agencies can serve the proposed use. With the following conditions: 1. The CUP shall be issued to run with the development as it is proposed per Case No. WSP-16-07. Any expansion, redevelopment, or redesign of the drive-up lanes would require a new CUP application. 2. The business shall operate in compliance the MU-C zoning regulations; no outside storage is permitted. A 10--2-L Ft-67Kenneth Johnstone, CP P Community DeveloI ent Director 6 -le-17 Date L k City of 7500 West 29th Avenue -«' Wheat Itdge Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Ph 303.235.2846 Fax 303.235.2857 Approval of Concept Plan The West End 38 Concept Plan provides for mixed use redevelopment on property located at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street (Case No. WCP-16-04 / West End 38). The Concept Plan is hereby approved for the following reasons: 1. The Concept Plan complies with the applicable zoning regulations in Chapter 26 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 2. All review comments have been addressed. and with the following conditions: 1. Site plan application(s) shall be submitted for review and approval prior to future development. A '' A f/A-lt.->:LUN-ft --U YL - \1\A -1fenneth Johnstone, ICP Community Develo ient Director 6-1»/7 Date L A . City of30 Wheat Nge - PUBLIC WORKS STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 2gth Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 To: Dennis Sobieski, Project Engineer, Kimley-Horn From: William C. LaRow III, Stormwater Quality Program Manager Date: June 28,2017 Subject: Proposed retail stores at W. 38th Ave and Upham St. Wheat Ridge CO 80033. I have reviewed the third submittal of the Stormwater Management Plan and engineering drawings dated June 22,2017 and all comments have been addressed to the Stormwater Quality's satisfaction. Best Regards, 9 A \1 liu M$4*all William C. LaRow, P.G., C.H.M.M. Stormwater Quality Program Manager City of Wheat Ridge PW Eng Dept 7500 West 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 ec: City of Wheat Ridge Stormwater electronic file www.ci.wheatridge.co.us U:\Land Use Cases\Land Use Cases\WSP - Site Plan\WSP-16-07 - West End 38\Approvals and Finals\SWMP Approval letter062817.docx West End 38 SIA - Phase I Public Improvements 06/22/2017 Item No.Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Item Cost 6" Curb & 12" Gutter LF 386 $14.00 $5,404.00 6" Curb & 24" Gutter LF 113 $20.00 $2,260.00 Temporary Asphalt Curb LF 330 $17.50 $5,775.00 Drive Aisle - Asphalt Pavement SY 1,140 $45.50 $51,870.00 38th Avenue - Asphalt Pavement SY 140 $112.00 $15,680.00 Ramps EA 4 $1,800.00 $7,200.00 6' Sidewalk SF 487 $8.00 $3,896.00 4' Concrete Pan LF 40 $32.00 $1,280.00 Temporary Curb Cut w/Rip Rap EA 2 $500.00 $1,000.00 CDOT Type R (5') Inlet EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 CDOT Type 13 Inlet EA 1 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 4' Manhole EA 3 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 12" Storm LF 740 $25.00 $18,500.00 18" Storm LF 74 $30.00 $2,220.00 Extended Detention Basin LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Traffic Control for W. 38th Ave. work (required for ROW Const. Permit) LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 Electrical Pull-box EA 3 $901.00 $2,703.00 Pedestrian Light Concrete Base EA 2 $574.00 $1,148.00 Pedestrian Light Standard EA 2 $1,848.00 $3,696.00 Pedestrian Light Luminaire EA 2 $3,746.00 $7,492.00 Sub Total $162,524.00 25% Contingency $40,631.00 Grand Total $203,155.00 The following items have been EXCLUDED: any demolition not specifically identified, municipal permit feees, tap fees, contractor's overhead, profit, design costs, traffic control, utility potholing, dewatering, off-site work except that adjacent to the site, landscape and landscape features including retaining walls, trails and sidewalks outside of the right-of- way, irrigation, site lighting, dry utilities, amenities such as benches, trash cans, etc., special concrete paving ortrash enclosures, development of the open space, veneer and other aesthetic improvements and maintenance.CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING APPROVED FOR:CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE O DRAINAGE O SIDEWALK PUBLIC WORKSO CURB & GUTTER O STREET 0MISCELLANEOUS O PLAT COMMENT Itemized Engineer's Cost Estimate DATE 06/26/2017 £1-24 4<---06/26/2017 CIVIL ENGINEER DATE SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS RECEIVED 06/26/2017 3rd Submittal West End 38 SIA - Phase 11 Public Improvements 06/22/2017 Item No.Item Description Units Quantity Unit Price Item Cost 38th Ave - 6" Curb & 24" Gutter LF 127 $20.00 $2,540.00 Upham St- 6" Curb & 24" Gutter LF 580 $20.00 $11,600.00 Drive Aisle - 6" Curb & 12" Gutter LF 330 $14.00 $4,620.00 Vance St - 6" Curb & 12" Gutter LF 43 $14.00 $602.00 38th Ave - 6' Sidewalk SF 841 $8.00 $6,728.00 Upham - 6' Sidewalk SF 2,946 $8.00 $23,568.00 Vance St - 5' Sidewalk SF 771 $8.00 $6,168.00 Accessible Ramps EA 6 31,800.00 $10,800.00 38th Ave - Asphalt Pavement SY 63 $112.00 $7,056.00 Upham St - Asphalt Pavement SY 362 $112.00 $40,544.00 Vance St - Asphalt Pavement SY 72 $112.00 $8,064.00 38th Ave - 4' Concrete Pan LF 64 $32.00 $2,048.00 Upham St-4' Concrete Pan LF 156 $32.00 $4,992.00 Striping EA 3 $2,500.00 $7,500.00 LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Fire Hydrants CDOT Type 13 Inlet EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 CDOT Type R (5') Inlet EA 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 4' Manhole EA 4 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 12" Storm LF 156 $25.00 $3,900.00 18" Storm LF 480 $30.00 $14,400.00 Underground Detetion Vault LS 1 $166,175.00 $166,175.00 Proprietary WQ Device LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Traffic Control for Upham St. work (required for ROW Const. Permit) LS 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 Streetlight Base EA 4 34,229.00 $16,916.00 Streetlight Luminaire EA 4 $2,096.00 $8,384.00 Electrical Pull-box EA 13 $901.00 $11,713.00 Pedestrian Light Concrete Base EA 9 $574.00 $5,166.00 Pedestrian Light Standard EA 9 $1,848.00 $16,632.00 Pedestrian Light Luminaire EA 9 $3,746.00 $33,714.00 Sub Total $469,330.00 25% Contingency $117,332.50 Grand Total $586,662.50 Note: This estimate assumes all Phase I improvements are already in place and are not included herein. The following items have been EXCLUDED: any demolition not specifically identified, municipal permit feees, tap fees, contractor's overhead, profit, design costs, utility potholing, dewatering, off-site work except that adjacent to the site, landscape and landscape features including retaining walls, trails and sidewalks outside of the right-of-way, irrigation, site lighting, dry utilities, amenities such as benches, trash cans, etc., special concrete paving or trash enclosures, development of the open space, veneer and other aesthetic improvements and maintenance. WEST END 38 CONSTRUCTION PLANS A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, T3S, R69W OF THE 6TH P.M. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, STATE OF COLORADO LEGALERIEI]QN' PROVIDED BY: FIEUTY NAnONAL TTLE INSURANCE CNPANY COMWI™ENT NO. 508-.0563184-017-017, .. AN EFFICTWE DA. OF SEPB€ER 16, 2016 AT 7:00 ./. PARCEL ONE: n€ SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF 11€ SOU™WEST QUARTER OF RE SOUTHEAST OUARTER OF SECmON 23, TOUNSHIP 3..., RANGE 69 ST OF ™E 6. P.... EXCEPT ™E WEST 100 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 85 FEET OF ™E EAST 175 FEET OF THE Soll,HnEST OUARTER OF ™E SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUT·NEST QUARTER OF ™E ...EAST QUANTER OF SAID SE)ON 23, AND FURTHER EXCEPT#·IG ™ATPORTION AS DEED TO ME aTi OF WHEAT RIDGE IN DIED RECORDED OCTOBER 8. le90 AT RECEPTION NO. 90086571, COUNTr OF .e·FERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. Cl.0 C.1 C2.0 C2.n i c.Li _ Ill- ft C I --// AL' * ..... STE DEMOU"ON * SITE LAYOUT • GRADING • -42 63.2 GRADING • /4.0 / I PARCEL TWO: n€ NOR™ 85 FEET OF ™E EAST 175 FEET OF ™E SOUTHWEST ONE-GUARTER OF ™E C42/05.ALL UnLITY * I -22*t c.i WATER NOTES . SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF 11·IE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE .+Al 0 C4.3 ..rm ZQUARTER (SW K SE K SW % SE *) OF S[CloN 23, TonivliP 3 Solm!. RANGE 69 nEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNrr OF ,EFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.CZ.0 PARCEL THREE: O.2 SANITARY CE + Eg 7 LOT 1, E.1 ALLEN 9.leDIVISION, RECORDED JANUARY 4, 2010 AT RECEPTON NO, 2/0000090 COUN. OF ,EFTERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. W. 38™ AVE PLAN AND * li CS.3 SAN TARY DETAILS A §19 Mi ,UnIESOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECnON 23, W,15HIP J 50UTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF ™E {TH PFNCIPAL MERIDIAN, COON™ OF ,£FFERSON, STA. OF COLORADO. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCR,BED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 526.40 FEET EASIRLY OF ™E SOU™WEST CORNER Of SAIO SOUTHEAST ONEQUARR: THENCE NOR™ERLY, PARAUEL WITH DE .ST UNE OF SAID SOUDEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 421.15 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO ™E IGHT OF 89 DEGREES ./INUTES 00 SE.I{/S AND ALONG A UNE PARAUn im ™E SOU™ LE OF SAID SOU™EAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.65 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO IHE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 MINU5 37 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 421.15 FEET TO A PONT 30.00 FEET NOR™ERLY OF THE SAID SOUTH UNE OF ™E SOUTHEAST ONE-011.t THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE ./T OF 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE OF 30.00 FEET NORIERLY OF K PARALLEL TO THE SAID SOUR LINE OF ™E SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET TO THE PONT OF BEGINNING. SAVE .0 EXCEPT .AT PO.ON OF THE ABOVE-DESCReED LAND CO'YED TO T,E AMERICAN OIL COMPANY ON THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 1972. TO NT: A PART OF 71€ SOUD€AST M OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUnt RANGE 69 *EST OF ™E 6™ PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 3000 FEET NORTHERLY APO 526.40 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOU™EAST *; THENCE NORTHERLY. PARALLEL I. THE VEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST X, A DISTANCE OF 100.0 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO ™E RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 5EC0NDS ANO ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOU™EAST /4 . A DISTANCE OF 131.79 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TD ™E RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 INUTS 37 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOU™ UNE OF THE SOU™EAST /: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO .E IGHT OF 89 DEGREES 46 MINUES 23 SECONDS ANDALONG A LINE OF 30.00 FEET NORTHU,LY OF AND PARALLa TO THE SOUTH LINE OF T}E 5OUTHEAST *, A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET TO THE PARCEL OF LAND, COUNI·f OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORAD. SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORION OF ™E ABOVE-DESCRIBED LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL FOUR (B) AS FOLLOWE: A/EF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECnON 23. TO»WSHIP 3 SOU™. RANGE 69 nEST OF THE 6™ PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF ,EFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO, BaNG MORE PARnCULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLO BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 4&00 FEET EASTERLY OF THEE 3€I F. *tra#YET#Empilia<Brum, UNE OF SA' SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 481.40 FEET TO TME MOST SOUTHEAST CORNER OF Sll BLOCK 1: THENCE NORTHENLY ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID BLOCK 1. PARAUEL ITH THE *ST UNE OF SAID SOU™EAST ONE-GUARIER, A DISTANCE OF 306.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNIN{ T,ENCE CON·nNUING NORTHERLY, ALONG SAID EASRLY LINE AND PARALLEL 'TH SAID *SI UNE, A DISTANCE OF 11/00 FEET TO AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK U ™ENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE IGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG AN Eillity LIF€ oF SAID BLOCK 1 AND PARAUEL WI™ TIE SOU™ UNE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-GUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 131.65 FEET To AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1; mENCE ON AN ANGLE TO T,€ RIGHT OF gO DEGREES 13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET: ™ENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND PARALLEL 'TH THE SOUTH LINE OF *D SOU™EAST ONE-OUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 131,70 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEG-ING. PARCEL A. THEE EST 100 FEET OF ™E SWi/4 SE'/4 SWI//4 SEt/4 OF SECTION 23, TO¥#ISHIP 3 SOUTH,RANGE 09 WEST OF THE 'TH P..., EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30.00 FEET ™EREOF FOR NORIH 38™ AVEIHI COUNTY OF .EFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. i BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FRI" In< FAST STAIC GPS 085ERVAmONS ANO ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO COORDINA. SNETE' OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83. 2011 ALONG .1 SOU™ERLY UNE OF THE Soll™EAST QUA,IER OF SECTION 24 TO¥NS,*P 3 SOU™. RANGE 69 IST. STH PRINCIPAL MENDIAN, VIHICH BEARS SOUTH 89·3820 V,EST, BETVEEN IHE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREIN. UBLUMARKL CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE .HA. 1 RECOVERED A 05 ALU/NUM ROD IN THE LAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE Cl™ HAU. 15 WORE OR LESS SOU™ OF W 297,1 AVE AND 53(y MORE OR LESS EAST OF WADSERTH RI. ELEVAION - 5471.62 {NAVD 88) -h ]_If OWNER Wazee Partners. LLC 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver. Colorado 80202 303.746.3175 Conlact· Tylef Do/ns Email: tdowns@wazeepartners.com Me MEC Inc. 2828 N. Speer Boulevard, Suite 210 Denver. CO 80211 303.907.4285 Contact: Bryan Moen Email: bmoen@mecengr.com ¥. 3'TH Lt -r li U l 1 L„ _ -PROkECT -1 LOCA™N1*142 1-L- 1 W. 32ND AVE·IIi-In- ¥IONLILMAEL 1.=2000 CIVIL ENGINEER Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4852 South l.lister Street Suite 1500 Denver, Colorado 80237 303.228.2300 Contact: Dennis Sobiesk Email: dennis.sobleski@kimley-hom.corn SURVEY Utec 300 East Mineral Avenue. Suite 1 Littleton, Colorado 80122 303.327.7517 Contact: Dale Rush Emil dfush@aztecconsultant.comm I F) r lili ARCH#TECT SAR 1550 Wynkoop St. Denver. CO 80202 303.436.9551 Contact. Patick *Nef Email: Plohlef@SARarch.comn LANDSCAPEARCHIECT Stone Landscape Architecture Contact: Terry Stone 303.919.9343 Email: terry@stone-la.com co.2 38™ A SECIONS I ./- 21% CO.3 -AM S AND LE * 0h<-Z * U.-S .S . 27.S OR.AND LE • C7.2 S AND LE C7.3 S -- ·.E lifCnoDRAINAGE I : TON VA DETAIL * bt 05 k S ANDARD DETAILS .--2 STA//ARD DETAILS * DESIGNED BY: KIP DRA¥84 S¥ 81(M cio.3 STANDARD DETAILS CHECKED BY: DUS Cl(k*STANDARD DETAILS • DATE: 03/28/2017 CiO.5 S ANDARD DETAILS • C10.6 S ANC)ARD DETAILS I.IN, 11 ER CONTROL Cll.2 N ON CONTROL PLAN I * 011.3 m )1 CORI * 01 .4 IN ON CONTROL 1 * 01.5 IN CON IV •C,1.6 .RE Cl .7 ON £.. .2% e m 1..8 DETILS • Cll.9 ON NOS • •crn· ov T RIDGE Em=e ....T RIDGE SINITATION DISTRICT #ZER • DENVER WATER 5 258% **°M b E CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE E ° RIBLIC WORKS. ENGINEERING O APPROVED FOR: :=EE?Em ../.Col.NT -'r-.1..1*. SUBJECTTO.......Cl.. CITY OF WHEATRK]GEE PRIECT NO. PUBLIC WORKS 096331009 DllE 06/28/2017 DRAVANG NAME RECENED 08/28,2017 CO€R SHEET 011. Submithi Cl.0 Cll iwiMME:S°229121WEW=rt:9„rAE°2%221°95=2·3,.W;°U°21./fi¢2'1 20 PM iT v-Tr 1,¥ r, %,-I,Ir,n. n,lfir.1--n«Ii- A,MI,ian,·,I MI,I An.prA,Ir,IY,-,7-4rl, R„I M,11,1 Nr ·.4„I -Mmir¥mrn,in-I,r- -. Aw,r,Am·1 0,r V Pill WEST END 38 WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING APPROVED FOR: 0 DRAINAGE O SIDEWALK ' O CURB & GUTTER O STREET O MISCELLANEOUS O PLAT - COMMENT fL+.t' O,€494114&0€78 ga-- >LI'rA..40.0,.+ 0.=st A CIVIL ENGINEER . ' DATE SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTIONS PREPARED: DECEMBER 9, 2016 REVISED: JUNE 21, 2017 FILE COPY Prepared By: Kimley»>Horn CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PUBLIC WORKS DATE 66 / 21 U>ll RECEIVED 0 6 27/26> / 7 444- 51,£3614*Tr+L(FREVIous,LY APPb 60 O451Ir) R S138.00 D SO.00 2017068510 07/03/2017 02:09:32 PM 26 Page(s) JEFFERSON COUNTY, Colorado SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT AO 04. THIS AGREEMENT made this 4 7 of &56,44-:10,7 by and between the CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, a home rule municipal corporation (the "City"), OLIVE STREET DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC, a Colorado limited liability company ("the Developer"),together referred to as the "Parties." RECITALS: A. The Developer is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Wheat Ridge, which is more particularly described in Exhibit A and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. The project entails mixed use redevelopment of the Property and is commonly known as West End 38 (the :'Project"). C. On May 4, 2017, the City of Wheat Ridge Planning Commission approved the Final Plat for the Property titled West End 38 Filing No. 1. A copy of the Final Plat is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. D. The approvals cited above are contingent upon the express condition that all duties created by this Agreement be faithfully performed by the Developer. AGREEMENT NOW, therefore, for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the sufficiency of which are mutually acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms, conditions, and fees to be paid by the Developer upon subdivision of the Property. All conditions contained herein are in addition 'to any and all requirements of the City of Wheat Ridge Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance, the City of Wheat Ridge Charter, any and all state statutes, and any other sections of the City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code and are not intended to supersede any requirements contained therein. 2. Related Citv Aareements and Approvals. The Property is subject to that certain Concept Plan for the Project titled West End 38 Concept Plan and will be subject to future review and approval of site plan(s), civil construction documents, right-of-way permit application(s), and building permit application(s). Through such approvals, the City will review and approve the final design any development and Public Improvements related thereto. This Agreement is based on information that was available at the time of approval of the Final Plat and shall not constitute approval of the Public Improvement designs.Recording Requested by:F NTG-NCS Cotorado 9051-414 u OK. The Developer shall obtain all required right-of-way and building permits, and comply with all applicable conditions including, but not limited to, contractor licensing, insurance and bonding. As a part of the right-of-way permit, the Parties have agreed to waive the requirement for resurfacing based on street cuts. The Developer agrees to limit the number of street cuts to the greatest extent possible. The City will be responsible for resurfacing of W. 38h Avenue and Upham Street from flow line to flow line after the Project is complete. 3. Prior Development Agreement Rescinded. The Parties hereby agree that the Development Agreement dated July 20, 1979 and filed for record with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder on August 16, 1979 at Reception No. 79074204, concerning the same real property which is the subjection of this Agreement, shall be and hereby is rescinded in its entirety, and shall be deemed null, void, and of no further force or effect. 4. Fees. The Developer hereby agrees to pay City Development Review fees to the City for engineering, hydrological, surveying, legal, and other services rendered in connection with the review of the subdivision of the Property. 5. Parkland dedication fee-in lieu. Fees in lieu of park land dedication shall be calculated pursuant to the formula in Section 26-413 and shall be paid at the time of building permit issuance. 6. Title Policy. Prior to recording of the Final Plat, title commitment for all those portions of the Property, as well as any other interests in real property (easements, etc.) to be reserved for public purposes or dedicated to the City shall be provided to the City. The title commitment shall show that all such property is or shall be, subsequent to the execution and recording of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances (other than real estate taxes which are not yet due and payable) which would make the dedication or reservation unacceptable as the City determines in its reasonable discretion. The City, in its sole discretion, may accept any dedication regardless of encumbrances. The title policy evidenced by the title commitment shall be provided within thirty (30) days after the recording of this Agreement, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the property so dedicated or reserved. 7. Breach bv the Developer: the Citv's Remedies. In the event of a breach of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by the Developer, the City Council shall be notified immediately and the City may take such action as permitted and/or authorized by law, this Agreement, or the ordinances and Charter of the City as the City deems necessary to protect the public health, safety and welfare; to protect lot buyers and builders; and to protect the citizens of the City from hardship and undue risk. These remedies include, but are not limited to: (a) The refusal to issue any building permit or certificate of occupancy; 30 2 (b) The revocation of any building permit previously issued under which construction directly related to such building permit has not commenced, except a building permit previously issued to a third party, (c) A demand that the security given for the completion of the Public Improvements be paid or honored, or (d) Any other remedy available at law or in equity. Unless necessary to protect the immediate health, safety and welfare of the City or to protect the City's interest with regard to security given for the completion of the Public Improvements, the City shall provide the Developer thirty (30) days written notice of its intent to take any action under this paragraph during which thirty day period the Developer may cure the breach described in the notice. 8. Installation of Public Improvements. All storm sewer lines, drainage structures, paved streets, curb, gutter, sidewalk, utility undergrounding, amenity zone, street and pedestrian lighting, shared access drives, and necessary appurtenances as shown on the subdivision plat and the associated construction documents (the "Public Improvements" or "Improvements') as approved by the City's Director of Public Works or designee ("Director"), shall be installed and completed at the expense of the Developer within the timeframes set forth in Section 11 of this Agreement. Installation will be in two phases (each, a "Phase") as set forth in Exhibit C. The Public Improvements shall be substantially complete according to this phasing plan, with only such exceptions as approved in advance by the Director in the exercise of his or her sole discretion. The itemized costs of the Public Improvements required by this Agreement and shown on the construction documents approved by the City's Director of Public Works are set forth on Exhibit D and E. All Public Improvements covered by this Agreement shall be made in accordance with the construction documents drawn according to regulations and construction standards for such improvement and approved by the Director. It is understood by the Parties that the description of the Public Improvements may be general in nature, and that reasonable modifications of the scope, nature, costs, and similar aspects of the Public Improvements may be necessary to secure final approval of the Public Improvements. The quantities and locations for the Public Improvements are based on information that was available at the time of approval of the Final Plat. Additional Public Improvements may be required, and Developer shall be responsible for submitting construction documents for review of all Public Improvements and/or revisions to the Final Plat approved by the City. 9. Warranty of Public Improvements. The Developer shall warrant any and all Public Improvements which are conveyed to the City pursuant to this Agreement for a period of two (2) years from the date the Director certifies that the same conforms to the specifications approved by the City. Specifically, but not by way of limitation, the Developer shall warrant the following: (a) That the title conveyed shall be marketable and its transfer rightful; 3 (b) Any and all Public Improvements conveyed shall be free from any security interest or other lien or encumbrance; (c) Any and all Public Improvements so conveyed shall be free of defects in materials or workmanship for a period of two (2) years as stated above; and (d) To the degree the Developer is required to install and maintain landscaping on public or private property, it is the obligation of Developer and its successors and assigns, to maintain the required landscaping in perpetuity. The City will finally accept for maintenance all Public Improvements, exclusive of landscaping materials, after the two-year warranty period has expired provided all warranty work has been completed. The City shall accept for snow removal purposes only, all dedicated public streets after the City issues the first certificate of occupancy. 10.Observation, Inspection and Testing. The City shall have the right to require reasonable engineering observations and testing at the Developer's expense. Observation and testing, acquiescence in, or approval by any engineering inspector of the construction of physical facilities at any particular time shall not constitute the approval by the City of any portion of the construction of such Public Improvements. Such approval shall be made by the City, only after completion of construction and in the manner hereinafter set forth. The Director is designated by the City to exercise authority on its behalf under this Agreement and to see that this Agreement is performed according to its terms. Work under this Agreement may, without cost or claim against the City, be suspended by the Director for substantial cause. The Director shall, within a reasonable time after presentation, make decisions in writing on all claims of Developer and on all other matters relating to the execution and progress of the work or the interpretation of this Agreement, the master plan and specifications. All such decisions of the Director shall be final. The Director shall make all determinations of amounts and quantities of work performed hereunder. To assist him in this work Developer shall make available for inspection any records kept by Developer. The Director shall make all determinations of amounts and quantities of work performed hereunder. To assist him in this work Developer shall make available for inspection any records kept by Developer. The Director and his authorized representatives shall have free access to the work at all times, and Developer shall furnish them with facilities for ascertaining -C 4 whether the work being performed, or the work which has been completed, is in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement. The Director will make periodic observations of construction (sometimes commonly referred to as "supervision"). The purpose of these observations and construction checking is to determine the progress of the work and to see if the work is being performed in accordance with the plans and specifications. He will in no way be responsible for how the work is performed, safety in, on, or about the job site, methods of performance, or timeliness in the performance of the work. Inspectors may be appointed to inspect materials used and work done. Inspections may extend to all or any part of the work and to the preparation or manufacture of the materials to be used. The inspectors will not be authorized to alter the provisions of this Agreement or any specifications or to act as foreman for Developer. The Inspector will have authority to reject defective materials and to suspend any work that is being done improperly, subject to the final decision of the Director. 11.Completion of Public Improvements. The obligations of the Developer provided for in Section 8 and Exhibit C of this Agreement, including the inspections hereof, shall be performed on or before June 1, 2018 for the Phase I Public Improvements and on or before June 1, 2020 for the Phase Il Public Improvements, and proper application for acceptance of the respective Public Improvements shall be made on or before such dates. Upon completion of construction by the Developer of such Improvements, the Director shall inspect the Improvements and certify with specificity its conformity or lack thereof to the City's specifications. The Developer shall make all corrections necessary to bring the Improvements into conformity with the City's specifications. Once approved by the Director, the City shall accept said Improvements upon conveyance; provided, however, the City shall not be obligated to accept the Public Improvements until the actual costs described in this Agreement are paid in full by the Developer. 12.Deferred Installation of Landscaping and Financial Guarantee. If a Certificate of Occupancy is requested prior to completion of landscaping and irrigation, an irrevocable letter of credit or escrow account shall be accepted for the completion of necessary landscaping and irrigation. Said financial guarantee shall be in the amount of one hundred and twenty five percent (125%) of the cost of installation. Letters of credit or escrows shall not be released until all planting and finish materials shown on the approved landscape plan are installed and accepted and the irrigation is installed and functional. The amount of the escrow or letter of credit shall be based on the itemized cost estimates in Exhibits D and E. Should the required landscaping not be properly installed upon the expiration of the letter of credit or escrow account, the City reserves the right to use such funds to have the required landscaping placed upon the subject premises. Any costs incurred by the City in excess of the funds provided by the letter of credit or escrow shall be recovered by the City through normal lien proceedings. 9 5 13.Protection. Developer, at its expense, shall continuously maintain adequate protection of all Improvements from damage prior to acceptance by the Cityand shall protect the City's property from injury and loss arising in connection with this p Agreement. Developer shall make good any such damage, injury or loss except such as may be caused directly by authorized agents or employees of the City. Developer shall adequately protect adjacent property and shall provide and maintain all passageways, guard fences, lights and other facilities for protection required by public authority or local conditions. Developer shall be responsible for damage to any public and private property on and adjacent to the site of Developer's Improvements caused by negligent or willful acts of Developer, its agents or subcontractors. Developer shall take all reasonable effort necessary to prevent damage to pipes, conduits, and other underground structures and to overhead wires, and to water quality. Developer shall protect carefully from disturbance or damage all land monuments and property marks until an authorized agent of the City has witnessed or otherwise referenced their location, and shall not remove them until directed. When any direct or indirect damage or injury is done to public or private property by or on account of any act, omission, neglect or misconduct in the construction of Improvements, or in consequence of the non-execution thereof on his part, such damaged property shall be restored by Developer at its own expense to a condition similar or equal to that existing before such damage or injury. Developer shall at all times, whether or not so specifically directed by the Director, take necessary precautions to insure the protection of the public. Developer shall furnish, erect and maintain, at its own expense, all necessary barricades, suitable and sufficient red lights, construction signs, provide a sufficient number of watchmen, and take all necessary precautions for the protection of the work and safety of the public through or around the Director's construction operations as Developer and the Director shall deem reasonably necessary. 14.Related Costs - Public Improvements. The Developer shall provide all necessary engineering designs, surveys, field surveys, testing and incidental services related to the construction of the Public Improvements at its sole cost and expense, including final drainage study letter certified accurate by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. 15.Improvements to be the Property of the Citv. All Public Improvements for roads, concrete curb and gutters, public storm sewers and public drainage improvements accepted by the City shall be dedicated to the City and warranted for a period of twenty-four (24) months following acceptance by the City, as provided above. 16.Performance Guarantee for Public Improvements. In order to secure the construction and installation of the Public Improvements the Developer shall furnish the City, at the Developefs expense, with the Performance Guarantee described herein. 6 The Performance Guarantee provided by the Developer shall be in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit for each Phase. The City shall be designated as beneficiary, and the amount of each letter of credit shall be for one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated costs of the Public Improvements to be constructed and installed as set forth in Exhibits D and E. The purpose of the letter of credit is to secure the performance and completion of the Public Improvements as required by Section 26- 418 Security for Required Improvements, of the Wheat Ridge Subdivision Regulations. The Developer agrees that approval of this Agreement by the City is contingent upon the Developer's provision of irrevocable letters of credit. The Phase 1 letter of credit shall be provided to the City within ninety (90) days of the execution of this Agreement in the amount and form provided herein. The Phase 2 letter of credit shall be provided prior to issuance of any building permit for the Developer's Property (Lot 1). Failure of the Developer to provide an irrevocable letter of credit to the City in the manner provided herein shall negate the City's approval of this Agreement. Letters of credit shall be substantially in the form and content set forth in Exhibit F and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The Developer shall not start any construction of any public or private improvement on the Property including, but not limited to, staking, earthwork, overlot grading or the erection of any structure, temporary or otherwise, until the City has received and approved the irrevocable letter of credit. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer may obtain the appropriate permits and commence demolition and/or remediation of the Property prior to the City's receipt and approval of the irrevocable letter of credit. The estimated costs of the Public Improvements shall be a figure mutually agreed upon by the Developer and the Director, as set forth in Exhibits D and E. If, however, they are unable to agree, the Director's estimate shall govern after giving consideration to information provided by the Developer including, but not limited to, construction contracts and engineering estimates. The purpose of the cost estimate is solely to determine the amount of security. No representations are made as to the accuracy of these estimates, and the Developer agrees to pay the actual costs of all such Public Improvements. The estimated costs of the Public Improvements may increase in the future. Accordingly, the City reserves the right to review and adjust the cost estimate on an annual basis. If the City adjusts the cost estimate for the Public Improvements, the City shall give written notice to the Developer. The Developer shall, within thirty (30) days after receipt of said written notice, provide the City with a new or amended letter of credit in the amount of the adjusted cost estimates. If the Developer refuses or fails to so provide the City with a new or amended letter of credit, the City may exercise the remedies provided for in this Agreement; provided, however, that prior to increasing the amount of additional security required, the City shall give credit to the Developer for all required Public Improvements which have actually been completed so that the amount of security required at all time shall relate to the cost of required Public Improvements not yet constructed. 7 In the event the Public Improvements are not constructed or completed within the period of time specified by Section 11 of this Agreement or a written extension of time mutually agreed upon by the Parties to this Agreement, the City may draw on the letter of credit to complete the Public Improvements called for in this Agreement. In the event the letter of credit is to expire within fourteen (14) calendar days and the Developer has not yet provided a satisfactory replacement, the City may draw on the letter of credit and either hold such funds as security for performance of this Agreement or spend such funds to finish Public Improvements or correct problems with the Public Improvements as the City deems appropriate. Upon completion of performance of such improvements, conditions and requirements within the required time, the Developer shall issue an irrevocable letter of credit to the City in the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of the total cost of construction and installation of the Public Improvements (including the cost of landscaping), to be held by the City during the warranty period. If the Public Improvements are not completed within the required time, the monies may be used to complete the improvements. 17.Indemnification. The Developer shall indemnify and hold harmless the City and its officers, employees, agents or servants from any and all suits, actions, and claims of every nature and description caused by, arising from or on account of this Agreement any act or omission of the Developer, or of any other person or entity for whose act or omission the Developer is liable, with respect to the Public Improvements; and the Developer shall pay any and all judgments rendered against the City as a result of any suit, action, or claim, together with all reasonable expenses and attorney's fees and costs incurred by the City in defending any such suit, action or claim. The Developer shall pay all property taxes due on any portion of the Property dedicated to the City and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City for any property tax liability in connection therewith. 18.Waiver of Defects. In executing this Agreement, the Developer waives all objections it may have concerning defects, if any, in the formalities whereby it is executed, or concerning the power of the City to impose conditions on the Developer as set forth herein, and concerning the procedure, substance, and form of the ordinances or resolutions adopting this Agreement. 19.Third Partv Beneficiaries. There are and shall be no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement. 20.Modifications. This instrument embodies the whole agreement of the Parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein; and this Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the Parties. There shall be no modification of this Agreement except in writing, executed with the same 09 8 formalities as this instrument. Subject to the conditions precedent herein, this Agreement may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction. 21.Release of Liabilitv. It is expressly understood that the City cannot be legally bound by the representations of any of its agents or their designees except in accordance with the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Ordinances and the laws of the State of Colorado. 22.Captions. The captions to this Agreement are inserted only for the purpose of convenient reference and in no way define, limit, or prescribe the scope or intent of this Agreement or any part thereof. 23.Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns as the case may be. 24.No Waiver. No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or constitute a waiver of any other provisions herein, nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided, nor shall the waiver of any default hereunder be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default hereunder. 25.Invalid Provision. If any provision of this Agreement shall be determined to be void by any court of competent jurisdiction, then such determination shall not affect any other provision hereof, all of the other provisions shall remain in full force and effect. It is the intention of the Parties that if any provision of this Agreement is capable of two constructions, one of which would render the provision void, and the other which would render the provision valid, then the provision shall have the meaning which renders it valid. 26.Govemina Law. The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern the validity, performance and enforcement of this Agreement. Should either party institute legal suit or action for enforcement of any obligation contained herein, venue of such suit or action shall be in Jefferson County, Colorado. 27.Attorneys Fees. Should this Agreement become the subject of litigation to resolve a claim of default of performance or payment by the Developer and a court of competent jurisdiction finds in favor of the City, the Developer shall pay the City's attorney's fees and court costs. 28.Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be hand delivered or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses of the Parties herein set forth. All notices so given shall be considered effective seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States mail with the proper address as set forth below. Either party by notice so given may change the address to which future notices shall be sent. ,-0 9 Notice to Developer:Olive Street Development Co., LLC 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Notice to City:Director of Public Works 7500 West 2gth Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 City Attorney 7500 West 2gth Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 29.Force Maieure. Whenever the Developer is required to complete the construction, repair, or replacement of Public Improvements by an agreed deadline, the Developer shall be entitled to an extension of time equal to a delay in completing the foregoing due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Developer including, but not restricted to, acts of God, weather, fires and strikes. 30.Assignment or Assianments. There shall be no transfer or assignment of any of the rights or obligations of the Developer under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City. 31.Recording of Agreement. This Agreement shall be recorded in the real estate records of Jefferson County and shall be a covenant running with the Property in order to put prospective purchases or other interested parties on notice as to the terms and provisions hereof. 32.Title and Authority. The Developer expressly warrants and represents to the City that it is the record owner of the property constituting the Property and further represents and warrants, together with the undersigned individual(s) that the undersigned individual(s) has or have full power and authority to enter into this Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The Developer and the undersigned individual(s) understand that the City is relying on such representations and warranties in entering into this Agreement. WHEREFORE, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank] 1 10 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Developer Property LOT 1, LOT 2, AND TRACT A, WEST END 38 FILING NO. 1, COUNTY OF - JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 13 EXHIBIT B Final Plat (see attached) /4 14 WEST END FILING NO.38 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIrrH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. 3.8758 ACRES - 2 LOTS AND 1 TRACT LINE TYPE LEGEND QUARTER SECTION BREAKDOWN SHEET 2 OF 4 FINAL PLAT ---7/.aA---- ---- -I)/91 ---lf_._- a.,1 -aim/-=V=wr · IC-1 51 -*=**40/& --'-.lig. 1/r EAS' " -=--I=-4 ' Ze>2/ - - lisTEN Lon-- r....2. 1 ....0.-.......' • 1 INN 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23. T.SS., 11.69¥., SIXTH P.M. B1 T.aS., R.6911.. SIXTH P.M. A NE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23. :@ I ................ ........................ 1 1 6--*. ....1 =.em. .....3.- ae...............i........1.:Li/..............:./. -5I>*7.-1./1 1 1 1 rl-Irm....BAD U!.11 1 1 lam '«-1,«my Ul / 11, Ialll/ 0"010 , ICT- U '-ID/ j illy'l ,.................... 0# 51. 11 g E- / 3.&.6.<.'..../-/..E...o......."Im."................"........».U......"./. cal*m / licg* mm,•1/ -¥, In[ , I I® 6, O-1 /clla / Ig=. %I EAFEP- =t=E =4£5215£15 1 I .........I IJIZE NO MJIGUIDI *91* U014 'mol-IM Sliermll 9 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.3S., R.69¥., SIXTH P.M. afir- N¥ 1/4 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 NE 1/4 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SW 1/4 SW 1/4 -Nuc -4, 1 1. :$:6 41 M .1/4 ...9 6 '.2 1.4.20&= ==..22'L -1-- ..RE-:0.,1....• lit 'm.=...- 91¥.-, 1.rm ;=; -ENE U. LCIC....m-... LCIOnc,-mon•/0/"· • --3- ----- 47 RE" r. === u»,ga=.1....... I '000'4.1-Zeigg €ar'-S.E..... (BASS OF BEA-05)A4*Igc ..A:144:65 6 -- 1001, =11. 9.2 Wpl 'IC ..... ll WEST END 38 FILING NO. A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SI]mt PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.8756 ACRES - 2 LOTS AND 1 TRACT FINAL CONDITIONS SHEET 4 OF 4 SYMBOLLEGEND FINAL PLAT feuho SEC» cove 1.Za:&':= <r2 --11/m.,S£14.0 78T£2- W.-r=... 1 201. 1 - *...../.1. a.... 81.1 . 2 - G7% .. 1 h; 0 1 --I+*./.---I/• OMED¢ ... ¥ .1 ..... B........A C.N *r ACCEPTED) 1. ...#6....96/./. OCAX=7 0,St-]ES u LIG.0, 00©*-TC,1 = =I I F€= ...; 010 # DE!S LINE TYPE LEGEND li -mb-Z#t - --- =«E\ 6---<»'CUU .211---4.A. r-- -----nt--RhM=,=Mr.... 11.Mi 4 11 N.0,38¥E UIL' 1_ 1 1-1 ..-1.U .1 I.,Tr --- 7NI//0/01=1//_ --- - - -=-0,=rns.2,rr - -h. 1 65 Iir-/ /1 -c.oo.•· 0 -I- ,-a• - 9 - t tno# 11 -.-'I 1 80{H,-IT€.3. i IC£,TED 91 DIS UT ' 5 4/ y,/ : #le-7 a// t 1 t »f 1 \ / D Mil w-ii# i#41 / 1 \-18,29 jEW¥ 131./ .....,Ir 60. EPri IGO·ocroot 1,104· -¥-1 1 Z it S S 1 b Goo i• 1 I. ....E 1,1, '£/.10 1.'™ L. S.,21'03, ... a.1./. B '-US UNG-...0 1Dll'21-,158- Mn-·44-1 1130· 211'5. SoW 2126' 57/'40Ur•. 2105' 2204' N.33™ 1,55 &1 - 103...SM .0, ...=.71,538*L i..c„· (35 Al.» .07 'N' 57-.'•,-W. 1.537 U,UnED / / l-un. 1,1. -7 1 -3.24[290.51· / --01 , ¥· 80!B AMM -- .-1{"Ria.£ ¥001,1 "auc L•} _ - - -- -- -* --- 5*. U,or »€ #.. EC 2, s-=2•'W 2•U- . 00..%#24 412= :%='415' 1 ' ST,-0 -Or, / Ior.cor LS #32,2 1--L_JE. <-=02.=-1 - DED<ATEDROW 1. 30TH Al-UE \ 1 (VAR,Aa E •UTH pu.IC Re. SED¥24-• 22120'i ..4 0. 0.0=10, Al "S/-4 ./ P. .L,!2 ·.--./.'DEVELOPER WAZZE PARTNERS. LLC R.M. kk :10 i'70 (aro€:4 7-03- aol7 -02:09.' 12 Pm Cniti-l 6.u n•,- C 143'WEST END FILING NO. c ---38 80 1 C.AUD1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF STION 23,TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SMH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.8756 ACRES - 2 LOTS AND 1 TRACT SHEET 1 OF 4 FINAL PIATOll/* CIRT":WAN Ell/Wrij'limi"Nioli:Q/11 01AE STREET DEVELOPMENT CO.. LLC, A COLORADO Uk«TED UABILITY COMPANY BEING THE THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY UNE. NOR™ 89·38'48 EAST 25.00 FEET OVRER OF REAL PROPERTY CONTAINING 3.8756 ACRM DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS TO TIE EAS1ERLY UNE OF SAID SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST r-'n fili 1 - DESCRI'TION SHEET NO. COVER SHEET 1 QUARTER SECTION BREAKDOWN 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 PROPOSED CONDITIONS 4 '-1 ,-1-1 PARCa ONE: THE SOUIHIEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUAR*R OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER oF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 21 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 VEST OF THE €TH P.M. EXCEPT THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 85 FEET OF lHE EAST 175 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF M SOUTHEAST QUANTER OF THE SOUTHIEST QUARTER OF T}E:SoIllHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, AND FURTHER EXCEP™G THAT PORTION AS DEED 10 ME CITY OF WHEAT ROGE IN DEED RECORDED OCTOEO; 4 1990 AT RECEPTION NO.90086571, COUNTY OF .EmRSON. STATE OF COLORAbo. PARCEL IMk 'r,E NORTH 85 FEET OF IME EAST 175 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE.SOUTHWEST ONE dUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER (SW * SE % SW % SE 10 OFF SECIION 23. TOMISHIP'3 SOUTH, RANGE 09 *EST OF THE BTH P.M., COUNTY OF ,£FFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL THREE: E.!:JE'*15!13925,5,2DEDJ2NUARY 4. 2010 AT RECEPTION NO. 2010000094 11.1.LI115 1$ '' 24 RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL D[*3 _b[2'DAY OF May 2017 BY THE WHEAT INDGE PLANN WISSION. r PARCEL FOUR (Ak A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 230 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF ™EOTH MaNCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF .EFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO.WORE PARTICULARLY DESCReED AS FOLLOWS BEG#*ANG AT A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 528.40 FEET EASTERLY QI THE SOUTHVEST CORNER OF St SOUTIEAST ONE-QUARTER; ™DICE NORTHERLY. PARALLEL WTH THE VEST UNE oF SAID $0Un€AST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 421.18 FEET,·THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO 'IME RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 00 SECONDSANC) ALONG A UNE PARALLEL VWTH THE SOUTH U)IE OF SAID SOU™EAST ONE-CUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.65 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO !THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES. 13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 421.15 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OFF 1}E SAID SOUTH LIC OF ™E SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER; TIENCE ON AN ANGLE· TO NE RSGHT OF 89 DEGREES 40 MNUTES 23 SECONDS AFO ALONG A LIE Of 30.00 FEET NORTIERLY OF NO PARALLEL TO THE SUD SOUTH UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET· TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOE-OESCRIBED LAND CONVEYED TO THE AMERICAN OIL COMPANY ON THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH, 1972, TO MT: A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST * OF SECTION 23. TO*NS,«P 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCPAL HEMDIAN. MORE PARLCULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET NORRERLY AND 526.40 FEET EAslERLY oF THE SOUTHEST CORNER Of SAID SOUTHEAST 14 THENCE NORTIERLY,:PARALLEL MTH DE WEST UNE OF SAID SOUIHEAST M, A DISTANCE OF 100.0 FEET; 11{ENCE ON AN ANGLE TO INE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES ;45 MNUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A UNE PARALLEL VATH THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUT}*AST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 131.79 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES:13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF iHE SOUTH UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST %; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES,46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND ALONG A 1}NE OF 3000 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARAUEL TO THE SOUTH LNE OF THE SOUTHEAST 11. A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET TO DE PARCEL OF LAND. COUNTY OF .EFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LAND DEECRIBED AS PARCEL FOUR (B) AS FOLLOWS: PARCEI FOUR (8): A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN lHE SOUTHEAST ONE,QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TO-SHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6™ PNNCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNT, OF JEFFERSON, STATE OFy COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS' FOLLOWS: BEGI-NG ATA POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 45.00 FEET EASTERLY OF TIE SOUTHVEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUAR1ER. WHICH POINT IS THE SOUnfnEST CORNER OF BLOCK 1. PAM AND 91(:P SUBDIVISION FIRST A-DMENT; THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID BLOC* 1,30.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PAFULLEL *,TH THE SOUTH UNE OF SUD SOUTHEASTONE-QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 481.40 FEET TO THE NIOST SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID BLOCK 1. PARALLEL MTH THE WEST UNE OF SND SOU1HEAST ONE-QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 308.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINTOF BEGINNNG RENCE CONTINUING NORIHERLY, ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE AND PARALLEL MTH SAID VEST LEE. A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET TO AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1:TIENCE ON AN ANGLE TO TME RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 145 MNUTES 00 SECOMS AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1 AND PARALLEL %41™ONE-QUAREIC A DISTANCE oF 131.05 FEET To AN EAmle,- 282 BLOUCXMST TIENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT afl 90 DEGREES'13 MNUTES 37 SECONDS. A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET; THDICE ON AN ANGLE TO ™E RIGHT OF, 00 DEGREES 48 NUTES 23 SECONDS NO PARALLEL WTH 11'E SOUTH UNE OF SA[) SOUTHEAST 0,E-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.70 FEET, MORE OR LESS. TO THE RUE POINT OF BEGINNING PARCEL FIVE. THE WEST 100 FEETOF:lHE SWI/4 SE,/4 SWI/4 SE174 OF SECRON 23, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6™ P.U, D t THE SOUTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR NORTH 38114 AVENUE COUNTY OF .EFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of THE SOU™EAST QUARTER OF SEClloN 23; T}ENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE. SOUTH 0013'Oy EAST. 330.62 FEET TO THE SOUT,ERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SEC11014 23: THDICE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY UNC SOUTH 89·38'24» MEST. 229.20 FEET TO THE EASTERLY UNE OF THE WESTERLY 100 FEET OF SND SOUTHWEST QUARTER Of THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 233; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY UNE. NOR™ 0012'077- MEST 30.00 FEET TO A UNE PARAUEL VATH AND DISTANT NORTIERLY 30.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RtGHT ANGLES, FROW THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTEROF SECT10,1 23; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE. SOUTH 89•38'24' VESL 100.00 FEET TO THE PODIT OFF BEMOING. 2¤IPT TIEREFROW THE PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO ™E 1_lilli Ih*filll-11 CITY OF *WEAT RIDGE RECORDED OCTOBER 8. 1990 AT RECEPTION NO. 90086571 IN THE OFFICE OF SAID CLERK AND RECORDER. 4•™Al- ACCIMm O IATE) I I IIEAL MOPIET¥ HAVE LAID OUT. SUBDIVIDED AND PLAnED SAID LAND AS PER THE ORAWING HEREON CONTAINED INTO LOTS AND ONE TRACT UNDER THE NAME AND STYLE OF WEST END 38 FUNG NO. 1, A SUBDIVISION OF A PART OF THE aTY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COLORADO At«) BY THESE PRESEP,TS 00 DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF VAIEAT RK)GEE AND THE PUBLIC THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL. PROPERTY SHOVW AS RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND DO *URTHER DEDICATE TO·THE CITY OF -EAT RIDGE AND THOSE MUNIaPALLY FRANCHISED UnUTIES AND SERVICES THOSE PORTIONS OF REAL PROPERTY SHO-1 AS EASEMENTS FOR.THE CONSTRUCTION. NSTALLATIOFA OPERATION, MAINTENANCE. REPAIR. AND REPLACEMENT FOR ALL SERVICES. THIS INCLUDES BUT IS NOT UMITED TO mEPHONE AND ELECTInC UES. GAS UNES. WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LIES HYDRANTS. STORMWATER SYSTEMS AND PIPES. DElENTION PONDS. STREET UGHTS AND ALL APPURTENANCES TMEREm OUVE STREET DEVELOPWENT CO.. LLC. A COLORADO UMITED UASIUTY COMPANYBY: Gqlb- NAAE OIRISTOPHER DOWNS AS: MANAGER OF OU,E STREET DEVELOPMENT CO.. LLC NOTARY PUBLIC: STATE OF £•lmed._ ) ) SS THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS Aa<NowlEDGED BEFORE ME ™1922 DAY OF ...!1.2 2017, BY CHmSTOPHER DO-S , MANAGER OF OU'VE STREET DEVELOPMENT CO„ LLC VATNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSON EXPIRES: .. 1Ull [92) U S,ITE6 IL I W. 38114 WE lili 413 IA +11 11 rm;m;-77-W-7 27 111 -31 @3 NORTH U MAYOR // / W. 321® AVE. 26 94 VICe#TY MAP SCALE: 1'= 2000' 1. THE STORMWATER QUAUTY DETENPON AREA HEREIN 9,07,4 AS 'STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT" SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWIER AND SUBEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER. THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, ™E COST OF -CH SAID OWNERS. HEIRS. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDDIG OR STRUCTURE ILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HWRALUC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA MLL BE MADE VATHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. 2. ™E OVMER. INS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS GRANTS LIMITED RIGHTS AM) PRMLEGES TO ACCESS AND TO FREE MOVEMENT THROUGH THOSE AREAS INDICATED AS 'PUBLIC & EMERGENCY ACCESS.' AS IUUSTRATED UPON THIS PLAT. SUCH GRANT EASEMENT SHALL BELMITED TO ME OUNERS. TENANTS. CUSTOMERS. AND GUESTS OF THE OWIVERS. AND SHALL FUR™ERUORE GRANT ACCESS TO AND FREE MO'£ME}IT THROUGH SAID'EASEMENm TO THOSE ENTERING SAID EASBENTS FROM Sa«LARLY RECORDED EASED,ENTS FROM ADJACENT PROPERTES AND/OR FROW ABUTTNG PUBLIC STREETS 3. THE FOLLOMNG EASEMENTS DEPICTED ON SHEET 3 OF 4, HEREOF, AND DESCRIBED IN FIDELITY NATIONAL nTLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMWI™ENT NO. 508-F0583184-017-017 (EFFECTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 17. 2016), ARIE HEREBY REMOVED, TERMINATED, AND EXINGUISHED OR MODIFIED IN PART. AS fOLLOWS: A. THE S-FOOT AND 10-FOOT PERIMETER BOUNDARY UnUTY EASEMENTS ESTABLISIED FOR LOT 1. ES. ALLEN SUBDIVISION. RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 2010000090, AND DESCRIBED IN GENERAL NOTE 4 SHEET 2 OF 4. OF THAT SUBDIVISION. ARE HEREBYREMOMED. TERMINATED, AND EXTINGUISHED IN THEIR ENTIRElY. 8. THE 20-FOOT AND 16-FOOT CROSS ACCESS INGREES AND EGRESS EASEMENTS SET FORTHIN GENERAL NOTE 9 ON THE PLAT OF THE E.S. ALLEN SUBDIMSION, RECORDED ATRECEPTION NO. 2010000090, ARE HEREBY REMOED. TERMINATED, AND EX™GUISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AUTOMATIC TERMINATION LANGUAGE CONTAMED IN GENERAL NOTE 9 OF THAT SUBDIVISION, WHICH PROVIDES IN PART THAT SAID EASEMENTS ARE TO TERMINATE AND FOREVER BE EXTINGUISHED UPON THE OCCURRENCE OF TIE GRANTEE'SHEIRS'. SUCCESSORS' AND ASSGNS' SALE OF LOT 1. ES. ALLEN SUBDIWSION. TO A THIRD PARTY. LOT 1 WAS SOLD TO THE OMER/SUBDI,IDER HEREUNDER ON JANUARY 16* 2015. TIE aTY Of -EAT RIDGE. COLORADO HEREBY ACCEPTS THE DEDICATION AND CONVEYANCE TO THE CITY OF THOSE LOTS, TRACTS. EASEMENTS. AND OTHER INTERESTS IN REAL. PROPERTY DENOTED ON THIS PLAT AS BEING DEDICATED. TO THE CITY FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. APPROVED TMS 2*DAY OF .#0L- ,2017 BY THE CITY OF VMEAT RIDGE mm,m=.CERI=AII 1. ROBERT D. SNODGRASS. A PROFESSIONAL LANA SURVEYOR UCENSED TO PRACnCE LAND SURVEYING IN THE STATE OF COLCRADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE SURVEY OF IEST END 38 FlLIG NO. 1 WAS MADE BY ME OR DIRECTLY UNDER WY SUPERVISION ON OR ABOUT THE 5111 DAY OF OCTOBER. 2018, AND THAT THE SURVEY IS BASED UPON MY KNOWEDGE. 1,FORMATION AND Ba.EF. IT HAS BEEN PREPARED {N ACCORDANCE MTH APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED ED)INN AS AMENDED AND APPUCABLE COLORADO STANDARDS OF PRACTICE, THE SURVEY IS NOT A GUARANTY OR WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. AND THE (CCOMPAN¥ING MAP ACCURATELY AND PROPERLY SHOWS SAID PLAT AND THE SURVEY TIERSOF. ROBERT D. SNODGRASS. P.LS. 36:0 7 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SIAEYOR , FOR AND ON BEHALF OF AZTEC CONSULTANTS, INC. NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORAD) LAW YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTiON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY MTHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST'INSCOVER SUCH DEFECT. N NO EVENT WAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN ™IS SURVEY BE COMMENCED WORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERnFICATION SHO- HEREON V I NOTARY AOBLIC F) THE ABNE DESCRIBED LAND BE]NG MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED· AS FOLLOWS: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH*EST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23 TOWNSHP 3 SOUIH. RANGE 69 VEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MER,DIAN, N THE CITY OF *MEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF'COLORADO, BEING WORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS'FOLLOVG: AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAIO SECTION 21 -ENCE THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER BEARS NOR™ 89'38'W EAST, MTH ALL BEARINGS HEREIN BE]NG REFERENCED TO SAID SOUTHERLY LINE; THENCE NOR™ 87'01'53' EAST. 659.18 FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE BARGAIN At® SALE DIED RECORDED FEBRUARY 13, 2013 AT RECEPTION NO. 2013018038. IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY AND IME POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BARGAIN AND SALE DEED. NORTH 0012'07- NEST, 100.00 FEET TO THEE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER THEREOF; THENCE ALONG nE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID BARGAIN At«) SALE DEED. SOUTH 89'38'24 WEST, 131.91 FEET TO ™E EASTERLY LINE OF MEAT RIDGE MARKETPLACE SUBDIVISION, FIRST FILING RECORDED DECEMBER 4 1995 AT RECEPTION NO. FO1562O7, IN SAID OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID WHEAT FIDGE WAFIETPLACE SUBDIVISION, FIRST FUNG NORTH 0010'13- MEST. 206.12 FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF SAID WHEATRIDGE MARKETPLACE SUBDIVISION, FIRST FUR«1 NORTH 89'38'20- EAST, 131.81 FEET TO THE WtSTERLY UNE OF LOT 1, ES. ALLEN ?WCk:RARY 4, 2010 AT RECEMION NO. 2010000090, IN SAD OFFICE OF THENCE ALONG SAID VESTERLY LJNE OF SAID LOT 1, NOR™ 0012'18' *EST, 114.33 FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY UNE OF SAID LOT 1, NORTH 89*44 EAST. 30408 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; 1HENCE ALONG lHE EAS1ERLY LNE OF SAID LOT 1, SOUTH 0013'or EAST, 119.91 FEET TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SOUTH*EST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH¥,EST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; C THE EASEMENTS RESERVED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 280 2012 ATRECEPTION NO.2012139837 (THE'20-FOOT AND 16-FOOT CROSS ACCESS INGRESS AND EORESS EASEMENTS) ARE HEREBY REMOVED, TERMINATED. AND ExnNGUISHED INACCORDANCE WITH ¥HE AUTOMATIC TERUNATION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN THERESERVATION OF EASEMENTS. %HICH TERMINATION WAS EFFECTIVE UPON THE GRANTEES HE]RS', SUCCESSORS' AND ASSIGNS' SALE OFF LOT 1, ES. ALLEN SUBDIVISION, TO A THIRD PARTY,. THE O.NER/SUBDIVIDER HEREUNDER, ON JANUARY 16,2015. 0. UPON RECORDAHON oF THS PLAT, ME EASEMENTS FOR RIGHTS OF WAY GRANTED TO THE CITY OF %,DIEAT RIDGE IN A DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 8. 1990 AT RECEPTION NO. 90088585 ORANnNG (1) A 27.27-FOOT ¥,DE SIDEWALK, UTILITY AND St(NAGE EASEMENT INUPHAM STREET. AND (11) A 7.5-FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK. UnUTY AND SIGNAGE EAEMDIT IN 38TH AVENUE IS MODIFIED, IN PART. BY A REDUCTION oF THE UPHAM STREET IEASEMENT GRANT TO THE NEW UPHAM STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY BOUNDARY ESTABUSHED BY THIS PLAT. SHALL BE EXDNGUISHED BY MERGER OF TITLE UPON RECORDATION OF LES PLAT E. THE EASEMENTS FOR UllUTr PURPOSES GRANTED TO THE PUBLIC SERMCE COMPANY OF COLORADO IN EASEMENT INSTRUMENTS DATED DECEMBER 18. 1985. RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO. 85122823 AND DATED DECEMBER 18. 1985 AND RECORDED AT RECEPTIONNO. 122823, ARE HEREBY REMOVED, TERMNATED, AND DmNGUISHED. SUBDIVSION DATA TABLE TOTAL AREA 18756 ACRES 10&819 SC FT DATE LAST Ralge) 0811=InE AREA OF LOTS (2)2017-04-20 MS-16·0810904 ACRES 134.818 Z FT. 2017-04-28 WCP-16·04 AREA OF TRACTS (1) .0.2266 ACRES 0.870 SQ FT.WSP-15472017-06-06AREA OF STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY a.5586 ACRE3 24.333 SO. FT.CUP-16·02 2017-06-15NOTE RIGHT-oF-WAY EXCEPTION PARCEl NOT NCLUDED I THE ABOVE TOTALS. 2017-06-19 ACCEPTED FOR RECORDRIG IN THE OFFICE OF T}E COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER OF .EFFERSON COUNTY AT,MOD< COLORADO. 7115 34 DAY OF· Ur u Df , 2017 UUil- JEFFI my CAR AND RECORDER14*0 6.£4L- BY: DEPUTY CLERK 00'mt.,=T D EVELOPER 2-10-11 WAZEE PARTNERS, LLC-¢1013)71>11,1 1E01 BROADWAY, SUITE 1175 SCAU WK DENVER. CO 80202 SHEET 1 OFIA:TI Pro, Ne. 41-= -U......T G. AAZTECRm'. r & 11 04 RE ** 20170 /.9.•rat i WEST END FILING NO38 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,- TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.8756 ACRES - 2 LOTS AND 1 TRACT LINE TYPE LEGEND QUARTER SECTION BREAKDOWN SHEET 2 OF 4 FINAL PLAT - -75Erii¥12 - CENJER 1/4 CORNER SECTION 21 , as Rs#* 6771 P.AL.1 \_,OUND NO. 6 REBAR *lm, 3-1/4- \ ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED *CITY OFWHEAT RIDGE LS 132,2 1988* co- PT. NO. 14709 a?OUND coaRD*VA lzE· N-70&46&52 E-114¢,I5.Ja 1 4,4 771UDE-19·46*£ 85400' N LONG#TUDE-105D¢'5115235 W NORIHERLY UNE SE 1/4 SEC 23 *489·41'34'E 2627.84' 1 EAST 1/4 CORNER SECTION 21 / \ 734 R691. 61}1 P.M. /FOUND Na 6 REBAR WTH 3-1/4' J ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212 1984' COMR PI Na 14809 a?OUND COORDfNATES·*=70448261 1E=121,08118 LA17?UDE-39'46'1187230N 1 LONG,TUDE=1050499.50362- W PROPOSED RIGHI-01 -WAY - - -nlaNG-mb,m=or=Vor - . PROPOSED LOTUNE -DisTiNG VT-ONE -PDOSmUsEMENT- - - EXISING EASEMENT SUE DIVISION BOUNDARY NW 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.3S,, R.69W., SIXTH P.M. 1.NE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.3S., R.69W., SIXTH P.M. 6 % 4------ag-- 3§l NW 1/4 SW 1/414SE 1/4 131&37 T In '4 S: 1. ALL UNEAL UNITS DEPICTED ON THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT ARE U.S. SURVEY FEET 2. THE GEODETIC POINT COORDINATE DATA SHOWN HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIED FRO,1 THE NAD 83 HARN STATE PLANE COLORADO CENTRAL FlPS 0502 COORDINATE SYSTEM, AND HAS A HORIZONTALACCURACY CLASSIFICATION OF 0.07 U.S. SURVEY FEET AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL AS DEFINED . IN THE OEOSPATIAL POSITIONING ACCURACY STANDARDS OF THE FEDERAL GEODETIC CONTROL SUBCOMMITTEE (FGDC-SID-007.2-1998). ' 1 BEARIGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARaNGS DERIVED FROM RTK FAST STATIC OPS OBSERVABONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO CCORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83, 20111 ALONG ™E SOUTHERLY LINE OF ™E SOU™EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUR. RANGE 69 nEST. 6™ PRINCIPAL MER[DIAN, WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89'38'24' lEST, BETVEEN THE MONUMENTS SHO-1 HER£11. N8939'59¥ 263074 657.69' 1 13 NE 1/4 it 1 I.S¥ 1/4 SE 1/4 % S ima E 4. ANY PERSON ¥810 KNOWNGLY REMOVES. b.1-TERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SURVEY MONU#£4KS) OR LAND BOUNDARY MONUMENKS). OR ACCESSORY COUM]TS A CLASS TWO (2) MISDEMEANOR PURSUANT TO 18-4-508 CRS. 5. AU GENERAL NOTES. DEDICATIONS AND PLAT RESTRICTIONS. AS SHOM, ON THE PLAT OF WEST END 38 FILING NO. 1 FINAL PLAT - SHALL. APPLY UNLESS SPECIFICAUY AMENDED AND SUPERSEDED HEJEF. . 6. 11«S SURVEY DOES NOT CONSnTUTE A TITLE SEARCH BY AZTEC CONSULTANTS. DIC. TO DETERMINE TITLE OR tASEMENTS OF RECORD. RESEARCH FOR THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE NTH CRS 38-51-106 AND THE RULES OF PROCEDURE.AND BOARD POUCY STATEMENTS OF TNE STATE BOARD OF UCENSURE FOR ARCHITECTS. PROFESSIONAL D{GINEERS AND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS. SPECIFICALLY 1HOSE BOARD RULES AND·POLICY STATEMENTS RELAnNG TO THEE DEPICTION OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY ON SUBDIVISION PLATE 11TLE CO-™ENT NUMBER 508-F0563184-017-017, DATED SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 AT 7: 00 AM. PREPARED BY FI)ElITY NATIONAL mLE NSURANCE COWPANY. WAS RELIED UPON FOR ALL INFORMATON REGARDNG EASEMENTS OF RECORD. InGHTS OF WAY, HTLE OF RECORD AND CIVIL COURT ACTIONS OF RECORD. 7. ALL DIMENSONS SHOWN HEREON ARE AS .EASURED U,LESS OTHERMSE NOTED. & BASED ON A GRAPHICAL REPRESENTATION OF FEDERAL BIERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (ARM) MAP NO. 08059C02146 DATED FEBRUARY 4 20144. IHE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES MTHIN OTHER AREAS ZONS X BE»10 DEFINED AS 'AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD MAIN-. 0. TRACT A IS NO»-BUILDABLE AND FULLY ENCUMBERED BY AN EASEMENT HEREBY ESTABUSHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROWDING PUBLIC AND EMERGENCY ACCESS, UnLITIES. AND ON-SITE STREETSCAPE A,ENInES 1 %1 N8939'lrE 1316.10' % gsa 05' r IM SW 1/4 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 65/05* NW 1/4 SE 1/4 9 NE 1/4 SW 1/4 Rim SE 1/4SE 1/4 * ST 1/4SE 1/4 1 i SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.3S., R.69W., SIXTH P.M. T 1 3- 2,4/L- 4, =.2-4 SE CORNER SECTION 23. 734 R0911, 67H P.u. \ FOUND Na 6 REBAR SOUTH 1/4 CORNER SECT}ON 21 SW 1/4 WITH 3-1/4- ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED73% R69% 6111 PN I SE 1/4 SE 1/4 try OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 13212 198•r FOUND Na 6 REBAR WTH 3-1/4 -1 | SW 1/4 it SE 1/4 00*R PT. NO. 15809 \1ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED 'CITY OFF \@706,% COaeVA,m· 1 -EAT RIDGE LS 133212 1984" COW? PT \-' SE 1/4 Sir 1/4 A-70%840.FOR NO m eNF OF Na 15709 j SE 1/4 E-121.076.85 AZED CONSUAN IE Q?OUND 0011'7*a1 lEs LA177UDE-39·46'09.76276' N N-70%82148 K.*.-/0./. 1 LONGITUDE-105'04'19.48794* W E-11444125LAT?7UDE-39 46'09.72050= N ----QUARTER =CT'll=AlrHO= LONGm/DE-,05N'5120,769= W GROUND COORD/NATES: E-»LE 1/256 CORNER SECT}ON 23, T34 N=705,829 669 R69% GTH P.M. E-119.430.848 FOUND NO. 6 REBAR 11>4 3-1/4- LAnTUDE-39'46'09.73730= N At.UMNUM CAP STAMPED LONGITUDE-105'0440.56257- W 18¢EAT RIDGE STREET WON 8334 LS;3212 1994' 589'38'24-1¥ 2633.65 SOUTHERLY UNE SE 1/4 SEC 23 (BASIS OF BEARINGS)A*ZIggem:= AzTE Prij. Nt= 4111WS DATE OFDEVELOPERPEgARAThyti 2016-M WAZEE PARTNERS, LLC 1301 BROADWAY, SUITE 1175 SCALE: . T.,O DENVER. CO 80202 SHEE·T . 2 OF.4 1 i 1 Rk·* nor,063.fa, L WEST END FILING38 NO A PARCEL OF LANI) LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.8756 ACRES - 2 LOTS AND 1 TRACT SHEET 3 OF 4 FINAL PLAT SYMBOL LEGEND S 1/2 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.:S., R.691., SIXTH P.M. LOT 6. BLOCK 1 MHEAT R/DGE UARKE;RAG SueD# VISION,1 SW 1/4 - ,R==07 SW 1/4 2tle,G UU-C SE 1/4 = *=Wix#4&=R/'=A i TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING ./ A 2ND EXCEPTION PARCEL 11 LOT 2 E.S. AUEN SUBDMGON REG„#,90 1 M. 00 4-E 304.08' LM:21 == EAS_ PARCEL 3 -NON'm= 6(PER TITLE COMMI™END Acm==lia 291!1307 LOT 1 ES. AUEN SUBDIVISION REC Na 2010000090le==?= ..- --- 14 Imm [GE]11 E £ .0000080_.1 7 f Z101Uef[ 5 QBr EAST U 6="1 NORNE OF THE SW 7/4 E '/4 57¥ 1/4 SE 1/4VSED 23 laul=A= 66 -0, le 2. 1 O lilliffTN, ..111IIlli V///////// (131.65') N89'38'20-E 131.770 (131.70') N89'38'20"E 131.81' 2 4 *M 2g h 15 ultrA Ellil E Ill E10000090 r UlllY EASE]fr E 11& 2010000090 PARCEL t,E %/Ff 11,ED) Bf M PUrn FOUND SECTION CORNER FFOUND NO. 5 REBAR WITH 1-1/4' ORANGE FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/1-1/4 RED PLASnC PLASTIC CAP STAMPED *AZTEC LS 36580' - 1 CAP STAMPED COLO ENG AND SURV LS 26958' FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/1-1/4 GREEN PLASne30 CAP ILLEGIBLE | , 40 (NOT ACCEPTED)FOUND NO. 5 REBAR WITHOUT A CAP | , FOUND 3/4' BRASS TAG AND NAIL O%" ILLEGIB.E (NOT ACCtPlED) p UKE:)00 DISTANCES PER LEGAL. DEECRIPTON15SEE SHEET 4 FOR EASEWENT AND LOT DETAILSl l N89*48'E REP*=M \i \ // -p\M N \l 6l LOT 7. BLOCK 1 4/mEAT RIDGE WARKEn'LACI SUBD#'SION. FIRST FlUNG , REC Na FU,58207 / ZONING .&-C 1 L" unm ER=T = m PARCEI UE IEREBY. FOIDIED BY DIS PLAT PARCEL4 (PER nTLE COMM!™END 1. 1 r E ji bl Ibl b > %1ST EXCEPTION PARCEL 1 PARCEL 5 (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) L 0 1/4 SE 1/4 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 NO EXCIPIOI M 1011-OF-mY ;/ 852,NEFIRENCED N 1,£611 0[302'noleS' C,9 1,11£ Coll/nUIT m.or 2ND EXCEPTION PARCEL 1 1 PARCEL2 (PER TITLE COMMITMENT) 3 a f]10,ED BY 1113 RAT &1 : m=imm)Bll Em•Am-m,lal- "-FLA!Sk I F ROAY [,5aENT BK 306 PG ISO (NOT "mal# I bl; PARCEL 1 (PER TITLE COMMI™ENT)277 -t•JOIT ' 1%1-ir-IAYNO Ille{T . lul LINE TYPE LEGEND --fWoN-1---- PROPOSED RIGHT-01-WAY - - - -affiNGRTrofaKY- - - PROPOSED LOT UNE ------4EXISTING LOT UNE -PROPOK-OSEERT- - EXISTING EASEMEN I SUBDIVISON BOUNUAHY 8 / S8938'247 131.91' (131.79') INo D[Em¢ FCm FRY 1--10- LIEMIBITI;1, NORE,8 . |il UMmY,477ED a W &51 OF CImAH - -1 29'38'24-WCO//1 C ma 02*NIMR ' 2/.MO EXCEP770/V PA1ST EXCEPRov e.,Rax 4 REC. NO. 9008f-- ' SE CORNER SECTTON 23.1¢ EE SGI•2 -45 Fo/JENT PA1¤1 U E 11.I.ili=-t.4%7364 77ED mIT+WAY RUIDED gy 16 73% R69*, 6™ P.U.FR&.Pos»ERIC:=I701*1) ARJ-C FOUND NO. 6 REBAR- poNT OF 1400,5039 WITH 3-1/4' ALUWINUU CAP=r=El ''3EGINNING 19.0 STAMPED 'CITY OF WHEATRIDGE 08'lb'ARCEL 4 (A)(131.82*) ,lIC-ITIS &10' IOUH _/ a UE OSI CE UCIATEDN89'38'WE 131.97 LS :3212 1984--2 ,- a,-, L--__----------4- >4611.AS891247 100 1 1.6 A.-4,»= 1 W. 00121 8¥jIVU 4117 1---- t $891240¥//W. 38TH AVENUE1,0 EKIFICM KE =6-/-IT 31.75'*JETE],CD N LIWL CEECy/106 (VARIABLE WIDTH 'UBLIC ROW) '/ /. N·(VARIABLE MDTH PUBUC ROW)1_EFEE,EN€9 - no, lsT EmepnoN P57*t' ..E'*.In30.00' I S89*38'24W 229.200 ,-E /256 CORNER SECT?ON 23, 73% R6911. 673 P.U.AIDal BINF OFSOU™ UNE Of THE SE 1/4 OF SEC 23 S8938'24-W 2533.65'AZIEC CON*TANIS MC. UND Na 6 REBAR VATH 3-1/4* ALUWINUM CAP STAMPEDi (BASIS OF BEARINGS)15 83'Reft 10@IT-OF-IY 'WHEAT RIDGE STREET MON 8354 LS;3212 1994' AIr, .rr - - I.Ii - 'a, 1 -Z SK r,v FOOM) NO. f REPAR Hf)7¢ 3-1/4-SOUTH !/4 CORNER SECTION 21 13* R##1, 671¢ P.U. AUJACHUW CAP STAUPED 'CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE N 13212 1984= 07 INS PUT NAZTEC /=-il CONSULTANTS. INC, ./1/-01/--1 U,*1.'01'.1. 00123 ne- 013)713.4- DEVELOPER WAZEE PARTNERS, LLC 1301 BROADWAY, SUITE 1175 imTmcill"MI'l. P.=- SCAU&T-* -4-1L...;4 WV WWLWL ur. Po, N.. 401-35 SHEET 3 OF 4 ' R of. 44 #501 7 0,2 rm WEST END FILING NO.38 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.8756 ACRES - 2 LOTS AND 1 TRACT SYMBOL LEGENDFINAL CONDITIONS SHEET 4 OF 4 FINAL PLAT , 'FOUND SECTION CC«NER lEi 1/FOUND NO. 5 REBAR NTH 1-1/4- ORANGEPLAS11C CAP STAMPED AZTEC 1.3 36580' S 1/2 SM 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23,0-=grit,-i T.SS.. 169¥. SmTH P.M.PER E Ill FOIME, LOT 6. BLOCK 1 IlfEAT·Riz)2- ' 2 A,Am¥r;FLICE ----------0 REC NO. F[)156207 .ZO,evs "u-c 1 1 9 1 2ND EXCEPnON PARCEL 4 C - 1/88811(fT 11?9·38'20*E 131.81' -1 1.....1 N9000'00*V 115.75.1 --18-0 1 / M - ---1 -16 SBOWME 22.51 ™A.47 Doo·00'18. R-20.00 | at-54459'5174 | - CHL-28.29' LOT 2 Ea ALLEN SUBDIVISION REC &#*#-4 7 1 :P M 1 N89*442 304,08' ,a l 29158 i-Mi 205·34' k- Itiu_ NK*Ow --1 ST//ITER O//1!Cl EASE*)/I 10.00.- 515=f QUIMID m PE al¥ TE --- 1 -=Iii-- ---NWWOOT ' 49.76 NOO·00*00)E 20.73'7 ] 11901*00'E 205.34' 1 _N89'38'487 25.000 1 LOT 1 124,886 SE 2.8670 AQ ; RIGHT-OF-WAY HEREBY 1 DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT i FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/1-1/4' RED PLASnC 20 CAP STAMPED *CO.0 ENG AND SURV LS 26958» FOUND NO. 5 REBAR W/1-1/4' GREEN PLASTIC3 * CAP ILLEGIBLE FOUND NO. 5 REBLR VITHOUT A CAP 40 (NOT ACCEPTED) FOURID 3/4 BRASS TAG AND NAIL ILLEGIBLE (NOT AOJEPTED) OCOC«) DISTANCES PER LEGAL DESCRIPTON SEE SHEET 4 FOR EASEMENT AND LOT DETAILS LINE TYPE LEGEND - - - 12¥Rti-iJAE- - - PROPCSED RIGHT-OF.WAY ---- -ER!,TfiG-NibIiTZof=14¥- --- PROPCSED LOT UNE --------- EXISTIMG LOT UNE - - -PROPLI-1-ur - - EXISTIMG EASEMENT SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 5* doM-Mi . -C . 01// :11*:RG g4 b1 12 §ik z s MARKEIPLACE , =221 l ' RE= Na /05,207 / 2ZON= Ill-C 1 i1 1 1 / ./ 1 1 / t// . .1 / / W. 88TH AVENUE (VARIABLE ¥MDTH· PUBUC ROW)_ 1 lim W 002}EY IUB-0 BY . 0'·1 == 24.04 1. 6=16-46'17 | R=57.50'416·48'18' L-16.83' n R=57.50' CH=N81'36'51'E 1 rl-16.83 CHL-16.77' \I CH=S81'36'51"W 4,m ,%46 N8959'597 88.43' £*_ 1 N90'00'OVE 119.69 ,1 -4tPlalt a El[RmICY ACCIES NE, Umm EMaE]lt =9.1RRJC & EiR,I](f ACCZES GUMED ef * Pul. u,un, WooT ]Ug, gWMED BY THS MAI TRACT A \1 N90·00'00 112.54 9.870 SF \S89'38'247 131.91'0.2266 AC263' -6.70' d k LOT 2 W El 2 9,730 SF ,,=TY F6 0.2234 AC B-Gme'T -8NEE PUT g.UNFLA 77ED N ZONED I"-C 11254'35.46' v 1 N89 38'247 290.51' m 1 S8918'249/ 100.00' 1 '21 zzry' /399- SOUTH UNE OF IHE SEE 1/4 OF SEC. 23 $89*24*W 2633.65' (BASIS OF BEAmNGS) i :i31" - 150 4 r 4 43 -1¥45 & b 589·46'57'W 32 b 41 . 142.51'11 1==1PARCEL 0=2=- \ m«r DEDICATED ROW 24,333 SF 0.5586 AC S89*24W 229.20' 1 1 1 UNE TABLE UNE BEARING LENGTH Ll 563·21'03*6.43'1 1 1 CURVE TABLE CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CHORD Cl 15*31'21' 50.000 13.55' N71'06'441 13.50' 02 26'38'57'SO.01 23.26' S76'40'32'W. 23.05 ,1 0 10904'29* 12.00'22.84' N54·22'337,19.55' (4 10:34'45' 76.00' 14.03' N7612'3674 14.01, (5 3·30'35- 25.00'1.53'579'44'41'W. 1.53'z 011 UNFIA nED SE CORNER SECION 24m. 869W, 6™ P.M. t FOUND NO. 6 REBAR JINH J-4/4" ALUM)/0' CAP- S,)44#¥D -ary OF 11,£41)ZDGE LS 13212 1984 -I*-I- - W. 38TH AVENUE (VARIABLE WIDTH PUBUC ROW) ,fwiz=i: E-W-E 1/256 CORNER SECTION 231 13& R69*, 6™ P.W. -FOUND NO. 6 REBAR NTH 3-1/4* AUJM}NUU CAP STAMPED 'WHEAT RIDGE STREET MON 8334 LS13212 1994' p,#24 ...6.11DEVELOPERAAZTEC-013)70-1-WAZEE PARTNERS. LLC CONSULTANTS,INC.-0. 715-07 1301 BROADWAY, SUITE 1175 ScalE Tua DENVER. COLORADO 80202 UT= 1,4 &·41110·36 SHEET 4 OF 4 [ 1 1 ..,1 Aaed &017069< 13 7-01-AO/7 £0:24:32 fm 06411 f 3 'id-·-t/kin WEST END 38 EmigGIIEAM: Wazee Partners, UC Contact Tyler Doens 1801 Broadway, Suite 1176 Denver, CO 80202 -- 720.420.1568 2.inglne[ Kimle*Hom and · Associates, Inc. Coritact Dennis Sobieski 4582 South Ulster. Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 303.228.2300 BASIS OF BEARING: 8[*ba=1 Shea,s Adkins Rooltmore Contact Patlick Bohler 1550 Wyncoop Street Suite 100 Denver, CO 80202 303.436.9561 Lindi'/glj)/ubas Store Landscape Architecta Contact Terry Stone 2100 Brentv.=d Street Lakewood. CO 80214 303.919.9343 BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM RTK FAST STATIC GPS OBSERVAnONS AND AREBASED UPON THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83,2011). ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF THE SOU™EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6™ PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICHBEARS SOUTH 89*38'20» WEST, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREIN. BENCH MARK: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 RECOVERED A 0.9 ALUMINUM ROD IN THE LAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY HALL 150. MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29™ AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS EAST OF WADSWORTH BLVD. ELEV = 5471.82 (NAVD 88) CONCEPT PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIANCITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO OWNER'S CERTIFICATE The below signed owner(4 or legany designated agentie) th-of, do hereby agree thatthe propedylegally described hereon wm be developed In accordance **hthe restrictions and condmons contalned: in this plan, and as mayethan,lae be required by law. 1 (we) fuflher reoognize that the approval ofthls Concept Plan does not cre- avested:property Vt Vemed propertyrights mayonly arin and ®crue purwant to the provisiond :of Section 26·121 ofth,Wheut Ridge Code of SHEET INDEX: 1 1 1 ., 9.2 r F ICITY CERAFICATION ,401-10,114&0ayollJ412L_--A£MZ by the Ctty of Wheat Ridge.11 1.--* SHEET 1 OF 2 COVER SHEET SHEET 2 OF 2 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT PLAN VICINITY MAP L- PRojECTS,TE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1,2 and Tract A West End 38 Fling No. 1. In the CIty of Wheat Rldge, County of Jefremon, State of Colorado. DESCRIPTIVE INFORMAMON: Gharagl=[2=k=nal Ollve Shit Development Co. UC, Christopher Downs. Manager State of Colorado ) Ca, + 0-w€r- 1 SS Coumy of * ) Thepregoina in:trumentwas ackno - - -01.dayof .lne__, AD. 2011. b WiDIessmyhand and omctals•al-" ' .;w,inlmA:£, 4 COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE State of Colorado ) )88 County of JefferBon ) 1 hereby certtly thatthls plan was filed In the office of the County Clerk and Recorder of Jeffersort Colmty at Golden, Colorado, at o'clock -.M. on the 122 day of f fiLY ,20'1 - 49.-18 -- STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WrTH ZONING: SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMk,ORE HAS PREPARED ™IS CONCEPT SUBMITTALFOR WEST END 38. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE. THE PROPOSED CONCEPT DESIGN IS IN gOMPLIANCE Wmi THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMU-C ZONING AND THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS. SITE STATISTICS: 6% i4. '.91 -ExaSTNG ZONING MU-C PROPOSED LAND USE MIXED USE COMMERCIAL- NUMBER OF DWEING UPITTS '165 +/- PRIA,Rf ErFEET W. 38™ AVE SE]E STREET UPHAM ST. The West End 38 projectwillbea 3.3- * "City's Main Street vision for38m Avenue. Thi p,ojectwil featue 165 apartment unlts, 0,]proidmatel, 8,600 square feet of retat] space. struch.Ired parking, and a mbcof outdoor public plazas and gathertig spaces. The project will Includeanemphasisongreer building features, residential amenities. end high quaity urban design. Per Section 25-1111.Cof the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code, tlis concept plan is required In order to allow 8 Nive•up component which is being proposed for a freestandre bank use. EhmIng,Elan This project will be developed as a single phase, but construction of the two proposed buildings *10 be phased. The smallerfreestanang bank blildbg will need to becompleted prlorto construction of thelargerresidentlal bullding. This will allow the following series orevents: Vectra Bank wRI remain as a tenant Inthe exising bulding on site dwing consDuction: upon compleoon of the smaller freestanding bank structure, they will move Into the new bulding; after moving, the existire bulding can be demollshed. and finally. the proposed mult€tory mixed use bulding and structured garage can ther be constructed. OWNEWSCER-,CATE The below signed owne,(81 or legaly deslgnabd agent(8) thereof, dohe,Bby agree thatthe property legaBydescrted hereon ¥111 be developed h accordance with the restrlcOons and condmons contained In this plain, and as may oulerwlse be required bylaw. 1 (we) further recognize that the approval of thls Concept Plan does not create a vested property right. Vestad property rights mayonlyerize and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Sed on 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge Code of AA! 1(40144 ZB, WA - Vectra Bik Colorado, Bruce Ale=nder, Preelded & CEO State of Colorado ) ) SS Laws. Minimum open spaces requirements are proposed to be met forthe development site as a -le, ratherthan calculated ona 1014-lotbasls. Openspaceand landscape plans will beprovided as partof theaite planset Book-, Page___, Reception Noak/allo%1. JEFFERSON COVITY CLERK AND RECORDER52 G+1 -054By: n.240•44.- & '112fi!: 1 to tile thntted amount of space for above ground storage and/ortreatment an underground detanvon vault w101 sand mer LOT 01 2.842 ACRES/123,782 SQ FT Is proposed forthe site and would be located beneath the structured garage atthe NE comer of the residentallot LOT#2 0.223 ACRES/8,730 SQ FT Zonina Comollance The properly ts zoned Mbmd Use·Commercial and vll be developed In compliance *10111,0 applicable standardB of TRACTA 0-227 ACRES/9,870 SQ FT Chapter26 of thet- ' -' ' .Build·torequirements (Section 28-1165.E) will be met for thi site as a whole, rdiher thbii calculate•lon a lot·brlot basis. RESDENTAL 173.000 SQ FT +/- RETAL 8,000 SQ FT +A STRUCTURED PARKNG 80,000 SQ FT +A Drainage facilities wil be provlded forthe development site asawhole, rather than calculated ona lot-brlotbasts. Due 13mforegoici tnstrument was acknowledge6 before me thtsMEday-401£ - AD. 2012. be-id 4/«1*=_. Witness myhand and official mal. My commission expires: JEWNIFERL TRUJILLO Noto,r/*Uo, Stole .1 ™gred'NotarY 19: 200846]0964 «v Comm!lon Expire$ 191·30 201' .. i BUILDING HEIGHT{MA)0 6 STORIES (901 4 STORIES 6 RES[£NTIAL ./. US SPACES PERU-T .5/RETAL/RESTAURANT 4-4 SPACES PER 1,000 SF * 9%»ACES PER 1,000 8$BANK, i WCP-16-04. MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 CASE HISTORY: 2m' ISSUED: 04/20/2017SA+R WAZEE , COVER SHEET Kimley *Horn PARTNERS SHEET 01 OF 02SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN e 1 A gr-·#00170 49573 WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIANCITY OF WHEAt RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO Ii#Mul""Mew 1 2 1mi™,r--r -- - - -4Wd,Wlan.1.Movedr -i......1,11· BROGE ABOVE@ LEVEL 2, 14'-5• CLEARANCE BENEATH (MII. REQ PER RESIDENTaLLOADNG . liM TER STRUCTURED r, fil; i:iii ·,;, 11 _ PROPOSEDFULLMOEMAyet•.ACCESS TO STRUCTU PAR+1 1/k 11 r= lili_ i -Lf [9-E71- 1 1 11 - 1 .,--- +MAIN ENTRY *-nAL - PASSENGER LOADNG i - EXTENTOF BRIDGE : ABOVE AT LEVELS. 24 1 -1 • · ·· .9- ·:Prl f! lizy: T-4- i 1 E :1 1.1hlili,111 -- ...-4-J 1... 1 5 1.-1 L I ?n Nt--1 fel:fa +STORYSTRUCTURE F ' U1 - 1 C 1 1Illit.1 .53NBANKS;TE 'I . --L - - NOT IN SCOPE 7 let* 1 2 ..: 1 i --=-itii · : t VEHICULAR 4OULATION BUILDNG FOOTPRna ,/7Z;TOX 1 ' ACCESS EASENT f. - LEGEND 157 ill'11 [ U F CURMMPEOSTING FULL =ir#NLY PROPOSED 3/4 #OV™&14 MO,-(ENT CONCEPT PLAN 1* = 30'-0" SITH AVE (PRNIARM R.O.W. 30'-O- {VARIES) Kimley»Horn SA+It WAZEE SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE PARTNERS ISSUED: 04/20/2017 AR¢HITECTURAL CONCEPT PLAN SHEET 02 OF 02 WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN 4/20/2017 520:26 PC:\Users\mbennett\Documents\1671 3801 & Upham - Cental 2017_mbehnettrvt -1.1...AIA "An'#"'A<010 r....--4 A.m r PROJECT TEAM: WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE ON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM RIA FAST )NS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO -1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83,2011), ALONG THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, IGE 69 WEST. 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICH VEST, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOWN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 RECOVERED A 0.5» ALUMINUM ROD IN THE LAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE REDE Wazee Partners, LLC Contact: Tyler Downs 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 720.420.1568 SZ!1!Linainac Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Contact: Dennis Sobieski 4582 South Uister, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 303.228.2300 BASIS OF BEARING: BEARINGS SHOWN HERE STATIC GPS OBSERVATIC COORDINATEE SYSTEM 01 SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RAP BEARS SOUTH 89°38'20" L HEREIN. BENCH MARK: 8[gh!12&1 Shears Adkins Rockmore Contact: Patrick Bohler 1550 Wynkoop Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80202 303.436.9551 El=igaL[0910.*Of Able Consulting Group, LLC Contact: Marcus Vahling 11990 Grant Street, Suite 310 Northglenn, CO 80233 303.325.3271 Landscape Architect Stone Landscape Architects Contact Teny Stone 2100 Brentwood Street Lakewood, CO 80214 303.919.9343 SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ·,6,•.44:··> 92*le•*'·64- 74'G€*»;Ar;BXW SHEET INDEX:4·Alk:*·Zes.*177-".1,420%6 .$€11 Ee g <, SHEET 1 OF 19 COVER SHEET729 .944,4 SHEET 2 OF 19 UnLITY PLAN (OVERALL)I. 'SHEET 3 OF 19 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN (WE 38) SHEET 4 OF 19 OVERALL GARAGE PLANS LVL Bl - 02 (WE 38) SHEET 5 OF 19 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (WE 38) SHEET 6 OF 19 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (WE 38) SHEET 7 OF 19 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (WE 38) SHEET 8 OF 19 SITE PLAN MECTRA BANK) SHEET 9 OF 19 FLOOR PLANS (VECTRA BANK):-a1;&*E# i iiiii ta*isegu BANK) SHEET 15 OF 19 LANDSCAPE NOTES (OVERALL) N . . .,-.·>SHEET 16 OF 19 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (WE 38) SHEET 17 OF 19 LIGHTING INFORMATION (WE 38)VICINITY MAP /Th -PROJECT SITE SHEET 18 OF 19 SITE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (VECTRA BANK) SHEET 19 OF 19 LIGHTING INFORMATION MECTRA BANK) OWNER'S CERTIFICATE The below signed owner(s), or legally designated agent(s) thereof, do hereby agree that the property legally described hereon will be developed In accordance with the restrictions and conditions contained in this plan, and as may otherwise be required by law. 1 (we) further recognize that the approval of this Concept Plan does not create a vested property right Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provi,ions of Section 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge Code of -7/ , 9 liM4 Gl tu 1•2/ Olive Str*et Development Co. LLC, Christopher Downa, Manager State of Colorado ) 9- X )SS County of.14.-an ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this2hday of)/uu . A D. 2011 bv &1 Wah & 'DWulf Witness my hand and omcIal seal. My commission expires: CITY CERTIFICATION Approvedth\•426•01 4#,tte_ - ·2)/7 by the City of Wheat Ridge/ COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDERS CERTIFICATE st2·Colorado )SS County of JBson ) ATTEST City Wterki I \€9toR•98/ 19'4 CITY HALL 150' MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29™ AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS EAST OF WADSWOR™ BLVD. ELEV = 5471.62 (NAVD 88) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING: SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE HAS PREPARED ™IS SITE SUBMITTAL FOR /LEDGE. THE PROPOSED SITEWEST END 38. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOW DESIGN IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQU ZONING AND THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS SITE STATISTICS: EXISTING ZONING ADDRESS PROPOSED LAND USEE NUMBER OF DWELLNG UNrrS PRIAARY STREET PROVIDED BULDJO (MIN 50% WITHIN 29) SECONDARY STREET PROVIDED BUILD·TO (MINI 30% WITHIN Xy) LOT 1 NET AREA , LOT 2 NETAREA TRACT A NET AREA TOTAL SIZE OF SiT# iNTS OF THE MU-C MUC 7333 W. 38TH AVENUE: 7391 W. 38™ AVENUE MECTRA) MULTI FAMLY RESIDENTIAL RETAIL. BANK 165 W. 38™ AVE 52% WITHIN O-20 UPHAM ST. 83% WITHIN 0-20 2.842 ACRES / 123,782 SQ FT .223 ACRES / 9.730 SQ FT 227 ACRES / 9 870 SQ FT 3.317 ACRES LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lots 1,2 and Tract A West End 38 Filing No. 1, in the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, per plat recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of said County. Lots 1, 2 and Tract A, West End 38 Filing No. 1, In the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ANGLES NOT INDICATED OTHERWISE ARE EITHER 90 DEGREES OR A SUPPLEMENT OF THE ANGLE DESCRIBED. 2. PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRIVES SHALL BE POSTED WITH 'FIRE LANE- SIGNS AS REQUIRED BY THE WEST METRO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT. 3. PARKING SPACES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED WITH UPRIGHT SIGNS. 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT REQUIREMENTS. 5. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRR]GATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE IRRIGATED BY A SEPARATE ZONE FROM SOO/GRASS; ™IS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS PLANTED IN SOD/GRASS AREAS. 6. BICYCLE PARKING RACKS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS, 7. PRIVATE ROADWAYS ARE NON-DEDICATED STREETS AND WILL NOT BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. 8. THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMONLY ACCESSED EASEMENT IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. 9. THIS SITE PLAN IS SUBJECT TO A LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THIS DOCUMENT. C )0 A,/QA -Ndtary Public JENNIFER L. TRUJILLO Notary Public State of Color.=do Notary iD: 2,094039954 My Commi„iwi ix res Nov. 30, 2017 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE The below signed owner(s), or legally designated agent(s) thereof, do hereby agree that the property legally described hereon will be developed In accordance with the restrictions and conditions contained in this plan, and as may otherwise be required by law. 1 (we) further recognize that the approval of this Concept Plan does not create a vested property right Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Sectjon 26-121 of the Wheat Ridge Code of Laws. 28, Nl,mk Colorado, Bruce Alexander, Presidd & CEO State of Colorado ) -Den@l ) SS The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2.day 0¤*ic , A.D. 2011. bvitw, /,Vic,vlk, I hereby certify thh®ls plan was filehe office ofthe County Clerk and'Recorder gWifferson County at Golden, Colorado, at \_,/6'clock__.M. on the day of A.D.,in Bool JEFI 3> , Page _/ , Rec@>t No. ERSO UNTY CLERK AND ORDER Deputy LOT 1 STATISTICS: NOTE: REFER TO SHEET 8 FOR LOT 2 STATISTICS RESIDENTIAL 176,554 SQ FT Witness my hand and official seal Mv commission exnires 1 JE:.NISER L. TRUJILLO 1 •'.•,ry Public -ado 039964 M. 30,2017N Public RETAL 8,614 90 FT STRUCTURED GARAGE PARKING 79,523 SQ FT 3**404,26*9#469:*Drit#,Ili BUILDING HEIGHT (6 STORIESar MAX)4 STORIES (54·-49 BUILDING COVERAGE 41,505 GSF 20%21»:t-;7·..,%11>)51, NNIFER L. TRUJILLO Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID: 20094039964 mmision Expires Nov. 30.2017 RESIDENTIAL 1-2.5 SPACES PEER UNIT STANDARD 166(*1 413 (MA)9 COMPACT (MAX 20%)44(MAX) ACCESSIBLE (1 PER EVERY REQ·0 25 OFF-STREET)7 (MN) RETAIL: 3-7 SPACES PER 1,000 SQ FT STANDARD 26 4/1 81 (MAX)ACCESS 2{MIN) ON-STREET: STANDARD ACCESSIBLE (1 PEER EVERY REOD 25 OFF-STREED 223 SPACES 203 N GARAGE. 10 N SURFACE LOT 3 N GARAGE ON GARAGE, 1 N SURFACE LOT 33 SPACES 18 N GARAGE, 13 N SURFACE LOT 1 N GARAGE. 1 N SURFACE LOT 2 SPACES 9 ON-STREET 1 ON-STREET RESDENTIL 1 SPACE PER 10 UNITS 17 18 N RACKS, 100 IN BKE STORAGE RETAIL: 1 SPACE PER 20 PARKING (MN 4) 4 6 IN RACKS ISSUED: 04/27/2017Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE COVER SHEET PARTNERS SHEET 01 OF 19SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN ..· <· 4.0/y.··er·% '0·'-'%.10 14.- 1... I Z . ... 4. "_1 ' h . ..21, 9?r,N'C- I'l, m - 1 ·13 I h i 4/17/2017 10:22:24 AMG:\Projects\1671 - 38th and Upham\02-Team\07<Zivit\2017.04.17 Civil litleblock for 2nd Site P,ir.knni.r,1\ vAO,£991 AAOTQ 1+n Plrir, A.•i,-1 x22 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO EX. SIORM MET GRATE=(543&5) - INV OUT 24' REP (N)=(5430.2) INV IN 24- REP (S)=(5430 4) NV iN 18* RCP (NE)=(5430.4) EX. FIBER TO rBE RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)unSTING RETAIL r PROPERTY UNEEX ABU?STRIP MAU FPRE (nE) i __ 329.1' S8938'44'W Ex. SANITARY j' 2 SEWER (Trp) 1 ROPERTY UNEf Ex a.5 3 RN=65435 97 :1 PROPOSED DETENnON VAULT12¤2542z,2-RIU=(5436.0)EX. SANITARY WANHOLE REQ. VOLUME: 22,635 CF \J INv iN 8 PVC (SW)=(5427.6)i I\ EX. STORM *NLET 1 -RN=(5435.6) NV OUT 18' RCP=(5431.0) i STORM SEWER TO BE ROUTED / -TO UNDERGROUND DETENTION USTORMWATER DETENnOI I VAULT: RE: MEP PLANS EASEMENT P1 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTl PROP. JUNCTION BOX-- PROP. WATER QUAUTY DEVICE TREA™ENT: 3.33 CFS -1 BYPASS: 24.55 CFS 1 INV: 24.631 ]02/JJ 1 1 10.0' DRAINAGOEASEMENT I 1. PROPOSED TRANSFORMER TIE INTO EX. STORM MANHOLE RIM=(5428.4) INV OUT 30' RCP 00=(5420.5) \ INV IN 24 PVC (0=(5420.6) INV(S)=5420.70 1 \- Er ARE HD?*vr TO REMA!N PROP. STORM MANHOLE RIM-29.86 -INV(N)-22.53 INV(W)=22.73 PROPOSED 10' SANITARY 6(. SANITAY SE¥£R (TYP) 11:1 200.0' GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOUnON OF EXISnNG STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING UTILInES SERVING THE STRUCTURE. UnUTES ARE TO BE REMOVED TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUnONED THAT THE LOCAnON AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISnNG UTIUMES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UnUTY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE. MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE REUED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UnUTY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UnUTES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF ™E CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTIUMES WHICH CONFUCT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 3. WATER UNES ARE ASSUMED TO HAVE 4.5' OF COVER AT CROSSINGS. 4. All- EXISANG DRY UTILITES HAVE BEEN ASSUMED TO BE 3' DEEP AT CROSSING LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGNEER OF ANY CONFUCTS. 5. CONTRACTOR TO FlELD VERIFY DEPTH AND LOCAnON OF ALL Ex]STING UnUTIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTJON AND SHALL NOIFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS. 6. EX]SANG PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS. 1-- L --/ 1 Ek \11 / sra™ (nP)7 I. 1 1 EX- ARE HYDRANT ern ' TO REWAIN i PROP. STORM_ / ;MANHOLE (TYP) PROP. 5' CDOTJEX. 24- sm,U mp)-A k TYPE-R Nlr- --- $ f \ 2/r. O EX- SANITARY WANHOLE EX ;0478?L SANITARY EX. FIBER TO PROPOSED RIM=(5431.6)7. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECnONWAIN (TYP) (rm)-BE RELOCATED UNDERGROUND INV OUT 12' VCP (N)=(5422.7) (BY OTHERS) EX CATV TO BE AT STRUCTURE IS WATERnGHT POWER r INV IN 12- VCP (S)=(54215)r RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)iNV IN E PVC (E)=(5424,8)8. ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND EX. GAS m INV »4 C VCP (W)=(5423.3)SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING dc COVERS. UDS SHALL BE LABELED STORM BE REMOVED 1%'!SEWER . 01. 1 -. \ -44-PROP. 3. DOMESTIC 9. CONSmUCnON SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL- APPUCABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BEJWATER30,Kk SERviCE FROM 2 METER CONSTRUCTED TO SAME.r EX. TELEPHONE -ENTRY ROOM 2 \PROP. 6' FIRE SERVICE 10. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A 9.4 00114 UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT-- -- -- A-' TED A FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT.RS) POOL AREA DESGNED BY EX. WATER TO 11. CONTRACTOR TO FLUSH AND VACUUM ENTIRE ON-SITE STORMWATER SYSTEM UPON74 MOSCAPE; RE:BE REMOVEol L-PROPOSED ROW I COMPLETION OF PROPOSED WORK. MEP/LANDSCAPE PLANS 190 NX- 1 12. ALL PVC TO BE SDR-35. J A I u 't RI/4/f l (BY OTHE E B1Ex. OUTLET STRUCTURE \1 PROP. t STORM-/RIW=(5436.7) /(·rrp)A/F 6*/7 24 - RO° A)=6511,29 PROPERTY UNE -EX. STORM INLET GRATE O FL=(5440.8)U INV OUT TE RCP (E)=(54346) PROP. Cl OT 5 INV *4 18' RCP (W)=(5436.0) /TYPE-R NLET j 1 IllV__ _J' L C lilli. K. POWER TO / E RELOCATED_- (BY OTHERS) EX. POWER TO BE RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)PEDESTAL rk 1 RELOCATED COMCAST 1 EX. FIBER TO PROP. 8 NYLOPLAST „'PROP. COOT 5'BE RELOCATED -,INLINE DRAIN WITHn- TYPE-R INUET (BY OTHERS)STANDARD GRATE CT7 dr-r,1.- 'U .1 .H PROP. STORM N'1111 1 , /-MANHOLE (TYP)IRELOCATED XCEL=-t'111 13. THE STORMWATER QUAUTY DETENnON AREA HEREIN SHOWN AS PROPOSED DETENnONL a RBER VAULT· SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAIN™NED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUEN T of'nc (TYp)OWNERS, HORS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER. THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HORS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO 1 1 BUILDING OR S™UCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERAnONS AFFECTNG THE HYDRAUUC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE WORKS. DETENTION AREA MLL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBUC 1 0-EX GAS (npj A_ Er NATERMAIN (rrP) ,-PROP. GAS EX. STORIA RPE a INV 18 PVC=(5435 1) 4,/ PROPOSED FIREJ PROP· STORM (TYP)HYDRANT -9-- BRADLEY GAS EX. WATER TOSTATION AND BE REMOVEDCONMNIENCE STORE 1 4 • EX. FIBER TO BE RELOCATED-m (BY OTHERS) PROP. 6= j ROOF DRAIN EX. POWER TO - BE RELOCATED /'- (BY O™ERS) I tAIN PROP ROOF OF PROP. 5000 GAL. GREASE INTERCEPTOR RE:MEP PLANS PROP. GAS AN' UcT·= 1 58)2ANITARY IMAINy·LI,Mill 0 PROP. CDOT TYPE 13 INLET J . • -4 EX. POWER, TELEPHONE -.-· 1 AND FIBER TO BE - , L RELOCATED (BY OTHERS)D--1 7 !6 • XCEL TRANSFORMER 1 'r TO BE RELOCATED COMCAST PEDESTAL TO BE RELOCATEDBAJ I EX. STORM INUE - - - TO BE REPLACE GRATE O FL=(5437. ROF. 4. 1L PROP. FIRE /HYDRANT a --c-+ t. EX. SANITARY MANHOLE RIW=(54415) INV OUT 12- VCP (E)=(5433.2) n ,WV IN 12* EP (*)=(54113) /INV Fi P VCP (S)=(5431 1 EX. 12' STURN (TYP) : Kimley»>Horn PROP. PROPOSED ROW ARE T PROP. POWER AND , ... THE BASIS OF BEARINGS BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM RTK FAST STAnC GPS OBSERVATIONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83, 2011), ALONG ™E SOUTHERLY UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89'38'24 WEST, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOVIN HERON. BENCHMARK: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE FHAC 1 RECOVERED A 0.5 ALUMINUM ROD IN THE LAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY HALL 150' MORE OR LESS SOUni OF W 29™ AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS EAST OF WADSWORTH BLVD. ELEVATION = 5471.62 (NAVD 88) f 3) EK '04 'ER EX. WATER F WAIN (TYP) PROP. 2' DOMESTC WATER SERVICE FROM 1.5» METER 81'. EX SmEET UGHTf m REWAIN / EX ARE HYDRANTf TO REMAIN t I.t_-,00067**R it a oalISAAC - fi GAS (TYP)W 38TH AVENUE EX. GAS (TYP) 7 TRANSFORMER '.2 - EX FIBER OPTZ (TYP)WATER UNE EX 5/5911/ AIANHXE PROP· RIM=(54429) 1-- -SANITARY PROP. f DOMESTICE INV OUT 48' RCP (E>=(5434.9)EX 48 STORW (nP) EX. 48 STORM (TyP) n %,IAIN (TYI INV IN 48*' RCP (W)=(5435.1)EX. SANITARY WANHOLE -- Rli=(5440.0 36 ---Il-=-1--*=-6 #,V OUT 12 %7 (0€5430.5) -I i1, EX. 12- Sl©Fal (rm)INV IN 11 VCP (W)=(5430.6) EX. 12 SANITARY INV W ?- VCP (S)=(5431 5)6€ SE;9/ MANHCZE EX. STORM tNLET RIU=(5439.0 1 09.412 'PZ-/5¢JZ,uj"rSEVER (TYP)INV OUT € RCP (0=(5433.5){NV OUT 18 RCP 04)=(5434.0) WV N 48 PVC (W)=(5433.6)INV N 12' PVC (S)=(5434.5) §A+R WAZEE PARTNERSSHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE \ NORTH / ....i EX. SANITARY WANHOLE \ mu=(5437, 4)U INV OUT 12' VCP (N)=(5429.1) INV IN 12 EP (W)=(54292) INV IN 8- LP (E)=(54293) 1 GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 30 9 ISSUED: 4/27/2017 UTILITY PLAN SHEET 2 OF 19 WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/19/2017 2:39:15 PM K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\CADD\Construction\Site Plant\096331009UT.dwg 1-1 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THESOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SECURE PARKING GATE BELOW @ LVL 81 PRIVATE BICYCLE STORAGE. QTY 100 29358'424 SECURE PARKING GATE AT LEVEL 1 10'-5 +L- L./.1 PARK'I PROPOSED ULL MOVEMENT ACCESS -O STRUCTURED PARKING BRIDGE ABOVE @ LEVEL 2. 14'-5- CLEARANCE BENEATH THE BRIDGE (MIN. REQ. PER FD ACCESS) ./-- 1./.Al' CUU. 1 YAKIJ ---1 LAI n 'Nl 1 %. INT.*I A 11 1. 2- lib 1 T- LCA» --1111:L 3.18 WA EREN , 1--- 1*!LINE OF g TRANSFORMER RESIDENTIAL TRASHENCLOSURE.CMU C I 17. 7 Lff <- liSTRUCTURAL WALL WTTH lilli 111111 ;lili lili WATEN..' I BRICKVENEER AND 'Arrd C - PRECAST CAP WITH OP'A{ - STEELACCESS DOORS BICYCLE STORAGE, QTYG -7%;»FF-- f l_-1-.3 'ta F:lul amila Id=ll jr-+'_ 1 All, 3,1.1.1 « BICYCLE STORAGE. QTY 4 RAISED PLANTER STOOP r- SPA 1 6 2 1 1 RP.4 F-1 0.1..EZI=Ir P°OL 1- 1-4 6 .RV/M &6#rp , 6 - ....- - RESIDENTIAL STOOPS AND ASSOCIATED STAIRS. TYPICAL 30' WATER tNGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PER REC. NO. F0134564 CONCRETE PLANTER BOXES. TYPICAL BICYCLE STORAGE, QTY 8 TYPICAL PARKING SPACE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 131.81' /UE FF r EXTENT OF BRIDGE ABOVE AT LEVELS 2-4 TRANSFORMER INTERIOR TRASH TERMINATION ROOM LEGEND RAISED PLANTER -«LOBBY CANOP¥ ABOVE #2: ' , 1.- 1 ' _ _1.- 12 1 ACCESS EASEMENT 'A' :PROP05E1 RIGHT IN · RIGHT OUT 4OVEMENT RETAIL DEDICATED PARKING 131.91' 30·€ INGRESS/EGRESS AND UTILITYEASEMENT PER REC. - NO. F0156207 *0' , - NOT IN SCOPE ---1 -1 . i BUILDING' -RETAIL CANOPY CURB RAMP3 1 "371 -ABOVECCI71 ABOVE 11-15 ,1 1 Wi 4.7, *r-4| GREASE 4 - ...0* i i uL 1 INTERCEPTOR :--me la SPOT ELEVATION %., 1 iPLEASE REFERENCE - RET12 1 1 OUTDOOR ·A- I :' ,1 COMPACT PARKING SPACE JECTRA BANK SITE 111111 1 1-1 DINING FENCE. 1 27 1 IF '21 1, 3--&1. IC 6 =7 ! //1 -*t-11jl' 11<ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE M nfll'01 1 0 11 -11 VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACEvw /=23 VA -LINE OF BUILDING EXISTING FULL 'PROPOSED PROPOSED)M | | ABOVE III1 BICYCLE STORAGE, INVERTED 'U MOVEMENT RIGHT OUT ONLY MOVEMENT 3•TH AVE (PRIMAR'n R.O.W. 30'-0" (VARIES} »RIGHT ONLY- SIGN RETAILCANOPY ABOVE - 6' PEDESTRIAN ZONE - LINE OF BUILDING ABOVE BICYCLE STORAGE. QTY 6 (RETAIL)VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SITE PLAN 1" =30-0 ISSUED: 04/27/2017Kimley>»Horn S At 11 Y>?fFf f SHEET 03 OF 19 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/17/2017 10:22:24 AMG:\Projects\1671 - 38th and Upham\02_Team\07-Civil\2017.04.1 7 Civil Titleblock for 2nd Site Prrilk,nittrll\ YAO91/AA/TA G„ Pinn ,-fui,·. .Ill.lill 1.1 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIANCITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PEDESTRIAN ACCESS DOORWAY r- MOTORIZED OVERHEAD / COILING GRILLE 11 42 RES]DENT]AL .4 PARKING STALLS 19 RETAIL PARKING DRMEENTRY STALLS L 34- ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL 11.lill'll 86 PARKING STALLS ,//////////1////7 . 89W 0 11 IllillI 01 1 1 111 1 1 I l l 1 1 40" 4- --I 99-4 r= 3 -- 2-=In_£-a===ZI--ir/// //// - ACCESSIBLE VAN STALL WITH T-O" HEAD CLEARANCE PERMITTED 7.596 UNEXCAVATED milii i GARAGE ENTRY MTH OVERHEAD COIUNG SECURITY GATE ON ACCESS CONTROL - CO to 7.5% 80 TYP. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL . 1 1 1 1 11 1,2 -------- . BRIDGE ABOVE @ LVL 21-111--3--t 14-5- CLEARANCE INTERNAL-1 1 ACCESS TO RESIDENTIAL- | | I BUILDING LEVEL Bl PARKING 1 LEVEL 1 PARKING 1 .20-0 NN 1 = 20'-0" 3.3% . LEGEND ACCESS EASEMENT 84 PARKING STALLS RETAIL DEDICATED PARKING 1 11 1 1 Q® CURB RAMP - ACCESSIBLE VAN STALL VH 7'/r HEAD CLEARANCE PERMITTED LVL 2 BRIDGE ACCESS TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDING .M 10-8» Lit ,-1 SPOT ELEVATION COMPACT PARKING SPACE INTERNAL ACCESS TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE lili BICYCLE STORAGE. INVERTED 'U' VEHICULAR CIRCULATION LEVEL 2 PARKING1 1" =20-0orn SA+R WAZEEPARTNERS SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE ISSUED: 04/27/2017 OVERALL GARAGE PLANS SHEET 04 OF 19 WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/17/2017 10:22:24 AMG:\Projects\1671 -38th and Upham\02_Team\07-Civil\2017.04.17 Civil Titleblock for 2nd Site Inrl,In-,H,1\./0,9/1/noll ./. PIr, /'A- CO Aalul!>1 MATERIAL SCHEDULE BRICK MASONRYVENEER {1) BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2) FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (1) PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) WINDOWFRAME /MULLIONS PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET COPING PRECAST CONCRETE SILL / TRANSITION STEEL GUARDRAIL COMMENTS RED RED VTH CORBELLED PROJECTIONS OFF-WHITE DARK BRONZE ZINC GREY DARK BRONZE MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH STAINED GREY POWDER COATED DARK BRONZE WEST END 38 PREFINISHED METAL COPING SITE PLAN - A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN - CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO REQUIRED PROPOSED HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY JOINTS PREFINISHED METAL SIDING= SOUTH RETAIL (NON-RESIDENTIAL) FACADE 60% MPI /317 SQ FT MIN 79%/417 SQ FT STEEL RAILING EAST RETAIL (NON-RESIDENTIAL) FACADE 30% MIN / 197 SQ FT MIN 64%/421 SQFT CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STAIR- PREFINISHED METAL SIOING (2) STEEL CANOPY MESH SCREEN T.O. PARAPET (UPPER} 411 ,*4/b--41:25 .157-107 1 1 B I,QI 11-U 1 1111144011.11,1 22 LEVEL 4 d , 137-4 7-- 4 O 2.2'4 - _LEV -, 3L ; U. .- :'. 2 Ul' 49 - - =1 r.-LEVEL 2 E . 1 18'.0• L. ' SECTION [ THROUGH BRIDGE W 11 ,bl- _LEVELI , 0-,91 PARAPET AT STAIR CORE BEYOND. METAL SIDING FINISH ROOF TOP CONDENSER UNITS - PRECAST CONCRETE MATERIAL TRANSITION ELEVATOR OVERRUN / TRASH ROOM PARAPET BEYOND k CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE ; PLANTER (RAW FINISH) -- 17- 1 /PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (1) U // / HOLLOW METAL EGRESS DOOR - VINYL WINDOWS. TYP - 11|CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE - - - - - - -TORGUEANDGRObviPLANTER (RAW FINISH)WOOD SIDING 3 OVERALL NORTH SE CORNER ELEVATION 1/16" = T -0 1000· '- BASEPOE.£ epUSG 5.439'-6·,98·-6- ' 9 _LEVEL 81 /7 . FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING - BRICK MASONRY VENEER (1) -ROOF TOP CONDENSER UNITS PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) PREFINISHED METAL COPING FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING - \ FIBER CEMENT LAP St[iNG STEEL GUARDRAIL 215'-3 POWDER COAT FINISH STEEL GUARDRAIL PRECAST CONCRETE PARAPET CAP STAIR CORE ROOF ACCESS ELEVATOR OVERRUN - 109-8 OUTI· - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) - MASONRY VENEER (1) - VERTICAL BLADE SIGNAGE FOR APARTMENT BUILDING BEYOND \\ \ \\ \\ \6.A-,4 PROMINE 1 FACADE / / /'n GLASS TRANSOM " 7- STEELGUARDRA\L --/1 T.O. PARAPET (UPPER) AR 152'-10 1 1 --6-Gul ' _• 9 %2¢03*a J 4'9-31 121 1/ HZ_ -*OR Wal JiN LEVEL 4 /A 11_WL -- -m FFI N-'4_[[1 _*_[Rl [R i**114 [[L {Bj{_68 _8_81112-_ L[I_. m El - pim { I f - 1 __LEVEL 3 /Ii 1-8-311- -m m @W-91_8 ___c m Ag 44 +· :L 1 921 ---- _EVELZ 116'-Cr L 1,1.- STEEL COLUMN AND CANOPY - -1 SEATING-/1./ STRUCTURE w/OUTDOOR LEVEL 1 /17,41,119 Lf- -F-- - 100'0- c 'l_ a RETAIL SIGNAGE - USG 5,4394. 98'-43. c.1 BASEP E PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) \ _ - _ LEVEL Bi in«O--- BREK_MAONRYENE@A (37 STEEL GUARDRAIL 894·1APARTMENT SIGNAGE - / MAIN RESIDENTIAL. - -ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2)CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE -RETAIL STOREFRONT ENTRANCEPLANTER (RAW FINISH. TYP) ---j'BRICKMASONRYVENEER (2)BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2) -STOREFRONT ENTRANCE ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT -RETAIL STOREFRONT ENTRANCE - -BUILDING EXIT IN STOREFRONT SYSTEM r 11&' , m, 06 ntt 1 ill 2 OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16'.1-0 ROOFTOP CONDENSER UNITS - VINYL WINDOW TYPICAL. BRICK MASONRY VENEER (1) - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) -- PREFINISHED METAL COPING - STEELGUARDRAIL ,-r PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (1) TONGUE AND GROOVE WOOD SIDING STEEL TIE ROD DETAIL. 95·0' PREFINISHED METAL COPING FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING -2-5 u RIDGE 1 STEEL GUARDRAIL, \ _1 TYP. 71--7n71 ROOF TOP CONDENSER UNfTS · STAIR CORE BEYOND - ELEVATOR CORE BEYOND r- PREANISHED METAL SIDING {2), STAIR CORE L ROOF TOP CONDENSER UNITS FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING T.O. PARAPET (UPPER) m 157-1/ 1HORIZONTAL JOINTS. TYPICAL - 3-22 1! iIi I _ ©_ -Epul# 4-i©© VINYL SLIDER PATIO DOOR AT JULIET - BALCONY _111 19__• w :1.6 9 &_w & 8' 66 WI 'i & WI- LU-,61 -W-/ @-3,STEELBEAM 1 Jlv_m.1 2_-2i ,. E-i-lit-il i 11,--F i 1 i lms' . -:"'prl1 - 1 4. BREEZWAY 1r EM]EFflE] it-1.49 1 . 1£-- 1 1 / ___ T __ __¢'-26,3-=PEr-4J1*FUUMB T.O. PLATE £ , 145-4 1 ' 9 Ch LEVEL 4 an 5 137.4" L. % - - L=t; G q3 LEVEL 2 k .116'-0· I. I F PRECAST CONCRETE - MATERIAL TRANSITION J LEVEL 1 /8 . BASEPE_£ EP USG 5,439%4» 98'-6- c' 9 LEVEL 81 *A , 89'-4- ' STEEL CANOPY STEEL TIE ROD DETAIL PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2)STEELCOLUMN CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE /OVERHEAD DOOR - PLANTER {RAW FINISH) OVERALL EAST ELEVATION 1/le= 1·0 TRANSFORMER - CONCRETE STOOP. ASSOCIATED - BRICK MASONRY STAIR AND GUARDRAIL VENEER (2) - BRICK MASONRY VENEER (1 ) TRANSFORMER - - CONCRETE PLANTER BOX - BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2) AT FACE OF STOOP ABOVE PLANTER BOX MASONRY VENEER (2) PARKING ENTRANCE SIGNAGE CRASH BAR AT T-0- HIGH ISSUED: 04/27/2017Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERS SHEET 05 OF 19SHEARSAOKINS ROCKMORE WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/17/2017 10:22:24 AMG:\Projects\1671 - 38th and Upham\02_Team\07-Civil\2017.04.17 Civil Tilleblock for 2nd Site Pr·,r. Fi„,itt,1\vnll91lrIAOTA C;tr, Pl,·1,·. /.A„-I MATERIAL SCHEDULE BRICK MASONRY VENEER (1) BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2) FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (1) PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) WINDOW FRAME / MULLIONS PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET COPING PRECAST CONCRETE SILL / TRANSITION STEEL GUARDRAIL COMMENTS RED RED \MTH CORBELLED PROJECTIONS OFF-WHITE DARK BRONZE ZINC GREY DARK BRONZE MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH STAINED GREY POWDER COATED DARK BRONZE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 63'.4- L 10'-8" C PRECAST CAP 1- c PRECAST CAP- R BRICK VENEEROPAQUE STEEL DOORS LEVELt /A LEVEL 1 /1 100'211 6 TRASH ENCLOSURE -NORTH TRASH ENCLOSURE - WEST 1,8 -1-0 5 1,8=1-0 14'-8-10'-8- ,L- 4" PRECAST CAP 4 - 4" PRECAST CAP c BRICK VENEER f BRICKVENEER 4 --1 4 /&2_ likE _ _ UNE'Ll __ __3*7 . 14 LEVEL 1 L -*2-7 100'¥-7 4 TRASH ENCLOSURE-SOUTH 3 TRASH ENCLOSURE - EAST1/8" = 1'-0"1/8" =1'-0 8'-0" ROOFTOP CONDENSER UNITS 1 ROOFTOP CONDENSER UNITS APARTMENT SIGNAGE PREFINISHED METAL COPING A\PREFINISHED METAL COPING -FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PREFINISHED METAL COPING - - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (11 F- ROOF TOP CONDENSER UNITS FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING BEYOND HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL JOINTS ROOF ACCESS LADDER- ROOF TOP CONDENSER UNITS - - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) ELEVATOR CORE OVERRUN - / 4 ELEVATOR OVERRUN - STEEL GUARDRAIL - 1290-8 TONGUE AND GROOVE WOOD SIDING STEEL TIE ROD DETAIL --1 \ PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) -- STEEL CANopY / F OUTDOOR AMENITY DECK \17-3 j , -- STEEL GUARDRAIL F PRECAST CONCRETE / PARAPET CAP /lA 1_1 1 --Ll._L_L--1-1_L_m_ _ - VINYL PATIO DOOR - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) - PREFINISHED METAL COPING - BRICK MASONRYVENEER (1) \PROMINENT WEST FACADE 4£- - - 1.0-2-ELfUPPER) an157.10• 7 EgiE T.O. PLATE 11 , 146.4 1 9 LEVELA /l p 137-4· CY 9, 0 LEVEL 3 /7 , T1252 1 ¥ 3 0 LEVEL 2 A , 116*a O - CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE / PLANTER, (RAW FINISH) EN--11-i-1.222-Mi-L--- 1. L.- LEVEL 1 L - 1 \ \ L RETAIL BLADE SIGNAGE USG 5,439'-6•,984 I\ \ INSTALLED BENEATH£-RETAIL BLADE SIGNAGE INSTALLED \--A --4--4 - STEELCANOPY- - tiVEL 81 \\\ \\L TRASH ENCLOSURE. CMU W/ BRICK MASONRY VENEER 1 \\L VtNYL WINDOW L- RESIDENTIAL STOOP BETWEEN \\I L RETAIL STOREFRONT ENTRANCE 1\\\-STEEL GUARDRAIL BENEATH STEEL CANOPY 89•4·/ PLANTERWALLS PREFINISHED METAL SIDING I HOLLOW METAL- EGRESS DOOR - OVERALL WEST ELEVATION 1/16' =1'.0 - PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL PANEL VCH ARCHITECTURAL FINISH 4-*4· WELDED WIRE MESH SCREEN OPEN TO COURTYARD BEYOND PRECAST PLANK BRIDGE W/ STRUCTURAL STEEL FRAMING AND STEEL GUARDRAILVW POWDER COAT FINISH - CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE PLANTER (RAW FINISH. TYP) - BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2), FULL HEIGHT WHERE BRICK DOES NOT MEET PLANTER WALL TONGUE AND GROOVE WOOD SIDING CONCRETE COUNTERTOP (RAW FINISH} GLASS AND ANODIZED ALUMINUM OVERHEAD SECTIONAL DOOR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT CONCRETE COLUMNS WRAPPED IN STEEL COLUMN SURROUND STEEL CANOPY ELEVATOR CORE OVERRUN ROOFTOP ACCESS LADDER ROOFTOP CONDENSER UNITS - PREFINISHED METAL COPING (2) PREFINISHED METAL COPING - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2)238-1 1 85'-6 /\r FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING GARAGE WALL BEYOND PREFINISHED METAL COPING FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 11111111111111'Fl"71, 1 -1 T OARAPET (UEPER) *A157-10 C' T.O. PLATE L . 146'< -" L_U 9!42-; 1 1 I LEVEL 4 *A- 137712.- VINYL WINDOW, TYP M:lilli #Hlltl ,/ L.U L-1.-1 -- - - 126'4 V'. 9 3 MASONRYVENEER (2)Pi_lflf- -ifi 168-1 L- rn w.U &VINYL- WINDOWS, TYP PRECAST CONCRETE MATERIAL TRANSITION . _ ..21----- 1 ,- 4 +i -1-41-4-1 - I -L€EL 2 E .116'4' r MW 1 0 EU 1 131-2 0-1 1 922, Et El-1 --- [TI\26 8%) 1-1 1 1 1, BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2) LEVEL 1 I- 000 BASEPOME_..,0 M./ mful,mEN · 11 L HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL- JOINTS4'xl· WELDED WIRE MESH SCREEN L.-2 PREFINISHED METAL- SIDING (2) OPEN TO GARAGE PARKING GARAGE STAIR CORE 1 OVERALL NORTH GARAGE ELEVATION 1,16"=1-0 PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL PANEL VITH ARCHITECTURAL FINISH ISSUED: 04/27/2017Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERS SHEET 06 OF 19 SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/17/2017 10:22:24 AMG:\Projects\1671 - 38th and Upham\02_Team\07-Civil\2017 04.17 Civil Titleblock for 2nd Site PAri,Arnittrd\ vAO/<1 11 AACTR titn Plmn & n L 1.-1 EL 01 131 0 [Il El L] WEST END 38 PREFINISHED METAL COPING SITE PLAN FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING -A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE LEVEL 4 L SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN13.CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO POWDER COATED DARK BRONZE ALUMINUM SURROUND - DARK BRONZE VINYL WINDOW. TYP - PAINTED DARK BRONZE BREAK METAL HEADER - PRECAST CONCRETE MATERIAL TRANSITION -I.+ BRICK MASONRY - - VENEER (2) -----.... LEVEL) MATERMI SCHEDULE BRICK MASONRY VENEER (1) BRICK MASONRY VENEER (2) LEVEL2- - - FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (1) PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) WINDOW FRAME / MULLIONS PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET COPING LEVELl .,PRECAST CONCRETE SILL / TRANSmON STEEL GUARDRAILBASEPE LEVEL 81 L COMMENTS RED RED WITH CORBELLED PROJECTIONS OFF-WHITE DARK BRONZE ZINC GREY DARK BRONZE MATCH ADJACENT WALL FINISH STAINED GREY POWDER COATED DARK BRONZE LEVEL 3 /, 1267--' LEVEL 2 /1 Ill ;] tr. - OPEN TO GARAGE FOR GE VENTILATION . . 0 11 BUILDING BEYOND CMU WALL BEYOND - PRECAST CONCRETE SPANDREL PANEL WITHARCHITECTURAL FINISH < 4·%4· WELDED WIRE MESH SCREEN FOR GARAGE BASEP04!LI VENTILATION AND SECURITY - LEVEL 81 /1 ENLARGED NORTH ELEVATION 2 ENLARGED GARAGE ELEVATION18 = 1-0 1/8-=1'-0" ROOFTOP CONDENSER UNITS STEEL FRAME CANOPY W/METAL SLATS @ PATION DOORS PREFINISHED METAL COANG PREFINISHED METAL SIDING. ZINC GREY (21 944 T.0. PARAPET (UgggEL-£152-17 JL T.0._PARAPET B 150·-4· k. PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) ZINC GREY j PREFINISHED METAL COPING - BRICK MASONRYVENEER (11 - DARK BRONZE VINYL TRANSOM WINDOW T.O. PARAPET CUPPER) F 152'-10- 1 - T.O. PARAPET /, STAIR CORE. PREFINISHED METAL SIDING (2) PREFINISHED METAL COPING - FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING *. _T.g: PARAPET (QPP[g.£_£157-10 1 T.O. PARAPET £ 150+ 7 - VERTICAL POWDER T.O. PLATE-_ZINC GREY T.O.PLATE *A COAT FINISH SIGNAGE r!:Ii-T.O. PLATE /7 POWDER COATED-- »uMETAL PANEL 1464=FOR APARTMENT - -- 1404'DARK BRONZE STEEL 14*F--' GUARDRAIL. TYPSTEEL GUARDRAIL -POWDER COATED DARKPOWDER COAT FINISH - 9 STEEL BALCONY EDGE, . BRONZE ALUMINUMPOWDER COAT FINSH -SURROUNDPRECAST CONCRETE -1. --11" APARAPET CAP -DARK BRONZE VINYL- POWDER COATED -WINDOW. TYPBREAK METAL TRANSITION -C}ARK BRONZE STEEL LEVEL-4 LEVEL*- - - LEMELL-GBRICK MASONRY VENEER J -C- --137'-4 WINDOW SURROUNDS -1374· 1 137-4* (1) POWDER COATED POWDER COATEDDARK BRONZE DARK BRONZE STEEL 1 11- Il./STEEL GUARDRAIL GUARDRAILS @JULIET JUUET BALCONY -BALCONY '.NUI-,1 J .*4 Al I PRECAST CONCRETE SILL. STAINED GREY -ilmilli lili DARK BRONZE VINYL WINDOW TYP CONCRETE COLUMNS WRAPPED IN STEELCOLUMN SURROUND 1 -234 E LEVEL 3 /11 POWDER COATEDTiay-J DARK BRONZE STEEL GUARDRAIL, TYP DARK BRONZE VINYL WINDOW TYP 1261 1 126·-8· 1 STEEL BALCONY EDGE.POWDER COAT FINSH -233 07 , STEEL BEAM HEADERSTEEL WRAPPED - CONCRETE COLUMNS. TYP. - PC)V,DER COATED STEELCANOPYVW WOOD SLATS RETAIL STOREFRONT ENTRANCE DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM - STOREFRONT - POWDER COATED 4- DARK BRONZE STEEL // GUARDRAIL OUTDOORSEK™G - -ia.LEVEL 2 /-, LEVEL 1 *I, BASEPIX@-£ 98'-6- ' STEEL TIE ROD DETAIL- STEELCOLUMN DARK BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT POWDER COATED STEEL CANOPY W/WOOD SLATS RETAIL BLADE SIGNAGE INSTALLED BENEATH STEEL CANOPY STEEL TIE ROD DETAIL- STEEL GUARDRAIL POWDER COAT FINISH- liIjililli 116'-0" -1 T- LEVEL 1 £, *i --XEVEL-2 BASEPE FLUSH DARK BRONZE METAL PANEL INFILL ABOVE WINDOW BRICK MASONRY VENEER(2) CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE PLANTER WITH RAW CONCRETE AND SMOOTH FORM FISNISH LEVE62 116'-0 Z' - HORIZONTAL & VERTICAL JOINTS - BRICK MASONRY VENEER (1) LEVEL 1 *A '064 BASEPIANL£98-6" '/ LEVEL 81 'A LEVELRL-£-89-4. c. ENLARGED SOUTH ELEVATION 3 ENLARGED EAST ELEVATION 1 1 ENLARGED EAST ELEVATION 21/8 = 1-0 18 =1-0 1 '8'' = 1'-0 ISSUED: 04/27/2017Kimley>,>Horn S A+ i Y>hi'N SHEET 07 OF 19 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEARSADKINS ROCK.MORE WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/17/2017 10:22:24 AMG:\Projects\1671 - 38th and Upham\02_Team\07-Civil\2017.04.1 7 Civil Tilleblock for 2nd Site P„,i'rv.'ll\, ..'911/AOT, 'i,n Ple, r. ,4-* lilliml WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LANDSCAPE - AREA - SINGLE UNIT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE RE: ELEVATIONS - PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE r- LANDSCAPE / AREA STATEMENT OF COMPUANCE WITH ZONING: / / LEGEND CSHOA HAS PREPARED THIS SITE SUBMITTAL FOR ™E VECTRA BANK PORTION OF WEST END 38. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, THE PROPOSED SITE DESIGN IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MU.C ZONING AND 1 T" TANTHE APPUCABLE PROVISIONS ' - CONCRETE PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA RE LANSCAPE PLAN SITE STATISTICS NOTE DRIVE THROUGH USE APPROVED PER RELATED CASE NOS. WCP-16·04 AND CUP-16-02 i 1 -I 0 WALL LUMINAIRE CONCRETE PAVING RE CML V i =CONCRETE UNIT PAVERS RE· LANDSCAPE PLAN - r--- OUTUNE EXISTING ZONING MUC ' STACKED I / CFCANOPY '' 1 1 .-DECORATIVE PAVINGVEHICLE PROPOSED LAND USE MIXED USE COMMERCIAL (TYP.) NUMBER OF BUILDINGS ONE (1) 2nd FLOOR V NEW ITOTAL SITE AREA OVECTRA PARCEL) NACREWSQ FTJ GROSS '[ACREWSQ FT1 NET -- PLANTER & 7 SEAT WALL J LOT 2 223 ACRES/9730 SQ FT RE: LANDSCAPING TYP. {FIBUILDING FLOOR ARE#*M '/4" BOLLARDS TYP. n 1/ FLOOR 2454 SF 2362 SF 4816 SF gTOTAL 2 5 1.IMC ..4,/ #iDESIGN ELEMENTS JREQUIRED PROPOSED M,2/1/11/7///4# 52!, :'Lj.,t .9//1//5 BUILDING HEIGHT(MAX)6 STORIES (901 2 STORIES (35') 8· - PROPOSED LAND USE 3416 GSF UJ BANK 2-5 SPACES / 1000 SO FT 10 (MIN). 25 (MAX)11 SPACES rn \/r 1 J2 STORY BRANCH BANK WITH DRIVE-THRU 1 . ATM - - Th.. 21 r V L J » LANDSCAPE PLANTERS ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES I-7 - 11(MIN)1 SPACE 1.5 18.00 noo I 10.35 3.00 =1 ON STREET SPACES 0 2 OUTLINE OF 1 - .L JYt 0/- (N)POLE MOUNTED CANOPY -BICYCLE PARKING 4 SPACES (MIN)4 SPACES ' LIGHT FIXTURE 1 RE: ELECTRICAL - E CONCRETE - - / PAV'ING2'M U 1- 2 WAY DRIVE AISLE SIGN - »EXIT ONLY 1111 1 CONCRETE UNIT PA'.'ERS /'lilli 1 + ; 11 0114 - E --4%:t . 24 LANDSCAPE (./L LANDSCAPE IREA PLANTERS 1 SITE PI-AN1" = 10'-0" RE: LANDSCAPE PLAN THIS SET FOR FURTHER DETAILAND INFORMATION. ISSUED: 04/27/2017 CSHBA Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE (VECTRA BANK) SITE PLANARTNFR< VECTRARAN.,i· ri •' c'. i ·* iq' tri ,· E- I.SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE SHEET 8 OF 191-./COLORADO WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 11 1 171 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIANCITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 0) 11"Ill lA, 11 (1) 2 345 6 (7) (8) 1-1 -41/4- tff .WES -,8 1 1 it- T 1 1 \U==== 111_,_ __---TTIti - --MAIN ENTRY -3 r -1- - 1 C D QE - CANOPY OVER ENTRANCE BOILER - - - -120SF-195f fri iii n . ·1 «K) 11111111 1 1 1 1 -; ' 4.21-2 -4- 1- -B 11 M.Bil» PNEUMATIC TUBE FORT 1 £5 1 LMS.) 57 SF Tmt 1 CQ i INC 1- -0 254 OFF;CE 05 1===J iUin .. 5F 1 BRANCH 1MANAGER IN< 1) r f--0- - - - -CANOPY OVER/ DRIVE-THRU/ 1 V 1MSF U 1 600 7 /IR 12-101/4 F- I 02 SF 7-11 11 y - I 1 -FC-L=J /11111/n |.I 20-11/7 242) CEOP"ITOR l.2-I 203 SF 4 |, 7 - 13/4-hr 17-31/7 15 -21/7 11(B)- ir 7@ir T -«22 (11 / .-1 M | CONFE#ENCE I 7-119/le -9" st-If--..-52 4,· 1 I I( 20 'r-lt,r-69/16· I|6'.511•1 It 4Sfi1 I UNSF "-2 x60 1 .OSF 1 1 MANAGE ail. N 6'-51/4 54 SF ELECTRICAL / --EHQNE 77 SF I / 1 L( J) 91/·-113/4-9-81/4 10'-4- /2 2 4 3Z- 3 irl 10-8'10-. L 27-31jr 7-73W WQMi< :73/4" /1 75·. r 75'-r (6) (7) 4)(5) (6) (7) 1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 9SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 1/8" = 1'-0" 1/8"= 1'-0" ISSUED: 04/27/2017 (VECTRA BANK) 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR PLANSCSHOA Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAfEE VECTRARANK® SHEARSAD/.1NSROCK.MORE 1.../COLORADO SHEET 9 OF 19 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 306SF ,0 ATM 720 11 \ LELI 5OSF 4 444 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MATERIAL SCHEDULE SIGN BY OTHERS n 42 SQFT +/- ' 113 .··1 NAME T.O. FEANRE WALL -- - -- -iil -135'-Cy BRICKVENEER 1 HARD COAT STUCCO [8 METAL PANELT.o. HIGH PARAPET I . . -- ---- -- - -_ _T.LglPA WINDOW MUI-LIONS METAL COPING CD b S-1 ST- M-1 M-2 M-3 COMMENTS DARKGREY LIGHT GREY COLOR CONSISTENT WITH WEST END 38 RED BRICK BLACK DARK GREY e (N) WALL - MOUNTED FIXTURE SECOND FLORL1fi-3' -0" \ GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY REQUIRED PROPOSED NORTH - FACADE A 30% MIN 24% WEST - FACADE B 30% MIN 27% SOUTH - FACADE C 40% MIN 42% EAST - FACADE D 30% MIN 44% SECONDARY MATERIAL - 08%METAL PANEL - FACADE C | 30% MAX | frsAS7+-- - 4" STEEL BOLLARDS, CONC. FILLED (TYP) 1 .FINISH F.LOOR 4% 100'.7 9 il 11 NORTH ELEVATION - FACADE A b 1 3/16"=1'4" 0 r- r k SIGN BY n QTRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATIONOWNER \ 42 SQFT +/ \%J 3/16" = 1'-0 0 7 r=i /1 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION 7 3/16" = 1%0" 9WEST ELEVATION - FACADE B 3/16" = 1'-0" ISSUED: 04/27/2017CSHBA Kirnley>)>Horn SA+ Fl wAZEE - (VECTRA BANK) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS P, A R [f,F- P E VECTBANEpeople who listen · design thal soeaks SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE SHEET 10 OF 19 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN b WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO [ NO.NAME rf A-1METALPANELCOLORCONSISTENT-MTHESTEND38RED-BRICK[*27*im-68*MULUONSIBLACK M-3 METAL COPING REQUIRED 1 PROPOSED SOUTH - FACADE C 40% MIN 42% EAST - FACADE D 30% MIN 44% SECONDARY MATERIAL METAL PANEL- FACADE C 30% MAX 08% -1 At-M. 1 SOUTH ELEVATION - FACADE C 3/16" = 1'-0" SIGN BY OWNER 42 SQFT +A T.O. FEATURE WALL 1_ M.3 _T.O. HIGH PARAPET h M·3 M T.O. LOW PARAPET h S.1 SECOND_FLOOR FINISH FLARLh- 9EAST ELEVATION FACADE D ISSUED: 04/27/2017 Kimley»Horn SA+R WAZEE (VECTRA BANK) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS F,ApTINFRq SHEARSADKPISROCKMORE vECTRARANIC1./COLORADO SHEET 11 OF 19 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1 el t • SOUTHEAST CORNER PERSPECTIVE + I+Ek NORTHWEST CORNER PERSPECTIVE ISSUED: 04/27/2017CSHBA Kinlley»>Horn SA+R wAZEE - (VECTRA BANK) COLOR PERSPECTIVES 9/\ C . 1- R Q SHEET 12 OF 19VECTBAMESHEARS"FINSROCKMORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO : t*-1 f .....1 /- 4. C .lili f /TURF C HEL SEM - -- -- AME ALN SHRUB BED. TYP-J PEN LIT TURF1 1 /WAAI/X•<mi, \L-(QUEHER'| QUEHER CALBRA DECIDUOUS TREEL--LARC COL SYR RET HEMSTE Il MIS SIN RIOS RAD 1 PEN LITGEE) lizily CAL ERA 'RUBFUL RM ' ACE TAT ROS RAD ERED PEN LIT CALBRA CONCRETE FAVEMENT TYR ROS RAD PEN LIT CALBRA ROS RAD j / --160U GRA,(EEED PEN HAM CAL ORA SOD PRU CER HEM STE CELOCC MIS S N PEN LIT HEM STE CELOCC AMEALN73*17 €L ,rhn. lili C ARC COL IRI SIB ACE PLA TYR - IR SIB 3 IRETE PEN LIT CELOCC ROS RAD PLANTER EDGE, TYR 5' SCREENING CONCRETE SEAT POOL PEN HAM311 1 - ---LL - MATCHLINE 7 -- 1 --------------- j I 9.-::r:*PEEFf::ur=·i:Flu 1-=i:riulri:rE --BIKE RACK, TYR - HF[ 'FAA - \ / /\2-i/-1--+El-ex -UZZL -GEED -EED- -CEED <EED -GED NOTE, •• DENOTES UNDERPLANTING WITHVINCAMINOR /GINBIL -US-Foa Ir I11 1 1- 1 1 ---(iii)J U .Al -0 1 RAISED PLANTER. Er-f-<E//U. M TYR F' 16--M-ifnES) J Iayt--'LEME.) r PED LIGHT TY,41 2 1 littivtnES) :5'Jrki--l..=151) STAIR W/STADIUM . _FEIED I 1!1 SEATING KE RAC <, TYP.-1 \.=u-121 1 COR SER @2E2»--0*21' £128,----ttEZED TRANSFORMER(EEE> f 3@r-•:ZEM ,- E*-*-1 i 0001*,Hilmitt£·;4'>;/ 1 1 A u,t----"';il¥$ 1 j'I , fl WE--1.-2/TH)f 1 11 7 1 -,1*4 j -(Ega 1 <EED . 1 WALL, TYP. <ZEEDTYR 1 (BEE>--1 CONCRETE 'l .1 PARTRI L UNIT PAVERS. TYP.7 ···'-6=!PWEID1_ CONCRETE I (EE- L I.OAVEMENT 1 #Ill ./9 1 N-7'l.21=EL)0 --32.-Abian /'I Z.\ 4 (EED1 1 ,d /I 6=:= - GILBIL )11 14 4 21 ,L J-r--C DIA GRA J ECH PUR5 SCREENING ' 34«t £5.1 f /4 1 g I FENCE BIKE r-**Gh D <t (EFED- < ATH NIP --1 UZED»]/ C HYDINC h--1--' ECH PUR" ,=-CEED ROS RAD PYR CAL ) 1-1 1 A -- -0 i1 R 1 GEE>- iE h<l COR SER E RACK, TYR EL 1 PEN LIT DIA FIR PYRCAL DlA F R PEN LIT COR SER BOU GRA RE EMES>n --7 1 HELSEN imLEDCONCRETE UNIT CONRETE CURB PAVERS, TYR PLANTER EDGE, TYP CONCRETE /CONCRETE SEAT RAVEMENT, TYP. /f-WALL, TYP. STRET LIGHT, TIP.2.-,-J 4 BIKE RACK, Te, ( GIL BL 1 - AME ALN 1 1 2942/4A.A .L.... I.1 i -290=---1111"11 -----. A . 4,12'e=S,- -I IRI SIB'Mje_------ -- --UEE&---77 0 - GEED-«/ -EED \--(EED /..UKE \1---€MZ' \\lEZEEF - \ -- 19 STREET LIGHT, TYR BOU GRA IRI S B-GLE TRI \L-<EEE) 1-LBOUGRA PED. LIGHT,TylpJ _»DL--EEEDWEST 38TH AVENUE ...==+===-- - - I r ISSUED: 4/27/2017 - STONE , 20' 40' M LANDSCAPE PLANKimley»>Horn SA+R \NAZFF CSHBA rECTRARANK® I .ARCHITECTv SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"SHEET 13 OF 19 [ANDSCAPE ..ARS ADKINS ROCK.OWE JUCOLORADO WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/27/2017 3:54:33 PM /Users/tstonelli/Desktop/Stone LA/SLA Projects/]60538thand Upham/CAD/01 - Landscape Plan -1MP Gln /1,-.rn ... WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PLANT SCHEDULE TREES SYMBOL ABBRV. QIX BOTANICAL ACE PLA 8 Acer platanokles 'Columnare' ACE TAT 3 Acer tataricum Hot Wings 1 t CELOCC 5 Celus occidentalis CER CAN 1 Cercls canadensis 1 3 GINall 5 Ginkgo biloba 'Princeton Sentry' GLE TRI 6 Gledits,a triacanthos 'Imperial' PYRCAL 10 Pyrus calleryana 'Chantideef PYR RED 2 Pwus calleryana ·Redspire' dhow,n COMMON Columnar Norway Maple Hot Wings Maple Western Hackberry Eastern Redbud Princeton Sentry Ginkgo Imperial Honey Locus[ Chantideer Pear Redspire Pear SIZE 2 Cal MB 8' Multi-stem (Clump) 2" Cal B&8 8' Multi-stem (Clump) 2" Cal MB 2.5"Cal B&B 2" Cal 8&8 2» Cal 8&8 SHRUBS & ORN. GRASSES ARI AMI 0 BU) ® Col e Col HY[ @ MAI ® PIN 0 RO: 0 BOl O CAL 0 HEL MIS O PEP O PEr PERENNIALS & VINES W*4 ASI AB - CA' +9169+99 02,4. Ecm '717'71717171717. HEI *0 HO 000000¤000 IRI..4#/P#4& RIM - PAF &......9/1 //v7/v7vv VIN OTHER ]COL 40 Arctostaphylos coloradoensis E ALN 6 Amelanchier alnifolia 'Regent' C GRE 20 Buxus Green Velvet' RALE 13 Comus alba 'Regnzam' RSER 43 Comus sercica 'Kelseyi ) INC 11 Hydrangea arborescens 'Abetwo' -1 REP 25 Mahon,a repens MUG 3 Pills mugo'White Bud' BRAD 43 iRosa 'RADIon J GRA 114 Boutelotia gracilis 'Blonde Ambition' BRA 68 Calamagrostis brachylricha .SEM 37 Helictotnchon sempervirens SIN 16 Miscanthus sinensis 'Morning Lighr 1 LIT 80 Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Uttle Bunny /HAM 82 Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Hameln' JAP 134sf Astilbe x japonica 'Deutchland' 1 Nlp 197sf Athynum niponicum var. 'Pictum ARAD 0 Campsis radicans 'Flava FIR 222sf Dianthus x 'First Love' GRA 1823< Dianthus gratianopolitanus 'Firewilch 1 PUR 351sf Echinacea purpurea ASTE 735sf Hemerocallis x 'Stellade Oro S GOL 82sf Hosta 'Golden Tiara' 513 516sf Iris siberica 'Butter and Sugar· 3 FUL 168sf Rudbeckia fulgida t TRI 18 Parthenocissus tricuspidata MIN 110sf Vinca minor 'Bowles' Panchito Manzanita Regent Serviceberry Green Velvet Boxwood Red Gnome Dogwood Kelsey Dogwood Incrediball Hydrangea Creeping Oregon Grapeholy White Bud Mugo Pine Pink Knock Out Rose Blonde Ambiaon Grama Korean Feather Reed Grass Blue Avena Grass Morning Light Maiden Grass Little Bunny Fountain Grass Hameln Fountain Grass White Astilbe Japanese Painted Fern Yellow Trumpet Vine Dianthus 'First Love' Dianlhus 'Firewitch Purple Conenower Stella D'Oro Daylily Golden Tiara Hosla Butter & Sugar Sit)erian Iris Black Eyed Susan Boston Ivy Vinca Minor #5 pot #5 pot #5 pot #5 pot #5 pot #5 pot #lpot #5 pot #5 pot #1 pot #1 pot #1 Pot #1 pot #1 Pot #1 Pot #1 pot @ 18· o.c. #1 pot @12' o. c. #5 pot @ 48» o.c. #1 pot @ 12-0.c #1 Pot @12-0.ca #1 pot @18-0.c #1 pot @ 12" o.c. #1 pot @ 18· o.c. #1 pot @18« o.c. #1 pot @18· o.c. #5 pot @ 48" o.c. #1 pot @ 24» o.c SITE DATA TABLE Open Space (OS)/Landscaping Usable Sod Nonliving" Living On-site trees On-site shrubs *** Street trees in ROW * Requirement calculations are based on within ROW - Calculations include publicly accessed *** Calculations include shrubs only, and, Note: Per the West End 38 Concept Plan met for the development site as a whole, Required*Proposed 10% Min. / 14,449 SF 27.3% / 39,490 SF 75% of OS / 10,837SF 25,130 SF 6% Max. / 8,669 SF 4,221 SF 0%0f OS/OSF 21,787 SF 35% of OS/ 5,057 SF 18,553 SF 15 (1 per 1000 SF) 53 145 (10 per 1000 SF)202 23 (1 per 30 LF) 20 improvements within property boundaries, and not spaces only not grasses & perennials , minimum open spaces requirements are being rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis. SOD Kentucky Eluegrass: 4.Variety Blend PRU CER 8 Punus x cerasifera 'Crimson Polite Cnmson Polite Plum 2" Cal B&B RM Rock Mulch (3« min. depth over fabric) Re. notes QUEHER 5 Quercus Heritage Heritage Oak 2» Cal B&8 1 1 SYR RET 4 Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac 2" Cal B&B (tree fo)FIN HOSCOL ASTJAP NOTE: ·· DENOTES UNDERPLANTING WITH VINCA MINOR J ( ATHNIP ( IRI SIB-·- ( OMAR - F 1I ./1/In /1 lilli TYP. W' 1 F C ROS RAD -I -- . >--</E l -GFERD 1 0 ...... .'.-1 - °5,2--·El,ZE') ' TRANSFORMER *b SOD,IYP -CEED [ PIN MUG' Kimley>,>Horn SA+R WAZEE CSH€&4 -ECTRARANT SHEARSAD.UNSROCK'ORE .IJCOLO1ADO MATCHLINE ./L--1 1 ISSUED: 4/27/2017 STONE 00 20' 40' 60' CD LANDSCAPE PLANIANDCAPE ARCHITECTS SCALE: 1" = 20'-0"SHEET 14 OF 19 WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/27/2017 8:53:58 AM /Users/tstonelli/Dropbox/38th & Upham/Source/Brad/2017.03.09_Complete Upload/CAD/01 Ir,n....An P...'.in CiER 1 CEE>-4 | BIKE RACK, TYR WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO NorE 00 NOT PtANT ANY PLANT WI™ HOOTBAU NOT 1,1 CO-O•NCE.™COLO*IR. ACT REQU,&2•.errS MOt.0 WLR-CH GfUZXZ $ BELOW EDGECWALKEDOINGORCURS -1-RETE C,a EDGU OR SEWALM - SE®,CM 1 1-P//2008.-%. AFTERFUNT-GA)©1.UOiNG SETD-m ATORAnEORO-CONT- 001 GAOAN IN NL-ER¥ SET TOP Of APUrS ROOT-UTOF.SHORACEOFMULCH FM'L'fSPEC€01*40(ArrDEPTII - SCO COaNNER AOOTiLS * EkC-CLP«GROOTS El i I ZI 11- N-111 -I....PIWI™SPEC/DICIUU MIX SEE SPE-ICATIO FOACO-OSiTION --IMMCC.-. .A©OTBA.* -ED SOL aul OU '17· SHRUB PLANTING •,oT To sc.Le NOTE: HERRINGBONE PATTERN. COLOR(S) TO MATCH/COMPLEMENT ARCHITECTURE /'h CONCRETE UNIT PAVER CHARACTER (NO) LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. All work shall conform to local, city and county codes. Contractor shall verify location of all underground utilities, lines, and structures prior to excavation or trenching. Damage to these utilities shall be repaired by the contractor at no cost to the owner or landscape architect. 2. Plant substitutions will not be permitted without approval by landscape architect. 3. Topsoil in landscape areas: All landscape areas, except streetscape planters, to receive 12" depth of "Amended Topsou available from Al Organics (see below). Prior to setting topsoil, scarify all landscape areas to 24- below finish grade elevation. 4. All streetscape planters shall be backfilled with "Planters Mix" available from Al Organics, Eaton, CO, (800) 776-1644, or approved equal. 5. After planting, all plants should rest with their root collars slightly higher than finish grade (1.5" higher for shrubs, 3" higher for trees).See planting details. 6. All beds to be mulched with either (a) shredded 'Washington Cedaf gorilla hair mulch, or (b) 1"-2" dia. decorative rock over weed fabric - depending on location, and both to a min. depth of 3". Plants should be thoroughly watered immediately after planting. Allow water to soak down and fill remainder of hole with loose soil without further packing. A mound of soil shall be formed around the edge of each tree pit to form a shallow saucer. Plants shall be installed immediately upon delivery to the site. If this is not possible, plants shall be heeled in and watered to prevent dehydration. Upon completion all plant material shall receive appropriate watering via an efficient automatic irrigation system designed by professional irngation designer. Street trees located in ROW planters surrounded by hardscape will be provided with additional features for improved root growth and soil drainage. Features will include increased soil volume beyond the planter dimensions using structural soil and/or gravel drainage sumps within the planter footprint. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPT, OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION OET-L.A01 SHRUB CmE SHRUB PLANTING L 7. 8. 9. 10 ff£4--27\=uq=/ 71[ WORAX- .AU.4*EE,1"535/ GR,sERMANU:D=n,mE v..MOUZ%167-JM#M# VARIS (4' MIN.) ,1'-3" ,017,51Ean-@7 4 1- - I.U.015 G.. WIt ¥0™ i. 0 *t i. ww,TE pvc p,PE ON .Acw -AE - SPECIFIED™SE STRAP COUAR DO NOT ./.T l-Velome.341 Zi,¥,-Un•60-046. Ee,PWA-V,1™ TOPS EV01 ORr,5 1, »,TO =ED =OE OUTS,De PLAI,rl/ ™EE STAI,ESLOCATED,OUWATE..EMON TREESGAEATERn-1/CAL USEGIA'SAS,IEREVERGREEN'm?El ,Wup ENT,RE SURFACE OF rRU- r Tomw,c,El wrri, REO,ED / ¥1¥W-G -EM SPECAED FEFER TO ErCATIONS SECI- I TOP WITDIC*ICTTAPE POTENTIAL DUPLEX RECEPTACLE 6" CONC. CURB % \ yi, 1% SLOPE A y==%\ CIP CONC. WALL - 3" MULCH - PLANTER SOIL MIX - FINISH GRADE : 1 1 Gu.DE + i..GATED AREAS . CONC OR UNIT PAVER- -CONC OR UNIT PAVER ,%1*-- PLAN. TRIEE 2. ABO, E SURRO»£,10 GRACE LE.'El ON LICS'*SED SURFACE SURFACE ./.CIFEDBACK'U MIXTURE ADMENOMENTS.S ....IN TO; 1.WALL & FOOTING TBD - - ALL TW 4-/ FROU.U. REWOVE NRE.KETS ,PER STRUCTURAL El,EVATO, VEWi· C ENGINEER.- 5 *Bal«; ICKFI'l .Phl, CO-.TED - n182//1//OTTE,FORMOOT...&CHECKBIREDMOINT O Ah toi DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCAl F ..Me«OCET< 441 11 1-11 lil l i--11 lEI ' 9-1-*Sit,%7134'49%9 I l illi El i El i li -11 lEi I -ORNUAR -NATNE SOIL -I//6%=5 08!!aETE -L--26*.1. IHOLE * BOLT ColE rr. - ¤ I 'mOUND ./."(1[;1 .afFACE FLN«36 ....{SE) .810.ACE GUSSEET MOUIT SG r,1-12.i I ILLTI 11-1!i-1.-ilut I SECTIONVEVS UPCHARGE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION DE™lL-801 TREE Col DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING L 1 -111- 0111 STREETSCAPE PLANTER AT GRADESCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2.. SURYACE OR •...rr CATE 8+14 ENG SMC =At=%=2*:4::jml%.....'. SPECA™JNSNeESIUCTTOC},ANGEWmKXITNOnCE *88UAVA,FACU[=10 11£,UPROF,Am,laREmERVED TAG,wEAT+EfmET--=. ISSUED: 4/27/2017 STONE 01 20' 40' 69 LANDSCAPE NOTESKimley»>Horn SA+R W?6* P CSI-1€hA VmMme LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS SCALE. 1" = 20'-0"SHEET 15 OF 19SHEARS ADKINS ROCKNIORE r·*Ople who *' deD,0·1JCOLORADO WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 4/27/20178:53:58 AM /Users/Istonelli/Dropbox/38th & Upham/Source/Brad/2017.03.09_Complete Upload/CAD/01 -1 ,·In./.nnn /1.r. Auill WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO ZONE LOT LINE· I [, 1 1 112 LUAIINAIRE SCHEDULE 1 1 111 'A 1 \ IL KEY DESCRIPTION MFR, & CAT.NO,LAMP VOLTS MOUNTING NOTE MAX INFORMATION WATT 2 OE ··••1-11» UPPER PARKING AREA CALCULATION ZONE. - 1, CALCULATION™16' AREA IS THE GROUND LEVEL 0.7 *0.0 b.0 *0.0 b.0 '0.0 *0.0 b.0 '0.0 *0.0 *0.0 *0.0 b.c o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 *0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 b.0 b.0 *0.0 *3 .3 *011 *91.5 *5 to,1 *U » 'D.4 to.4 » » *4 ;0.4 *0.5 *0.5 *0.4 *0.4 01 *q.8 9.5 9.3 4.1 9.6 ·17 4.7 4.4 9.6 *6 4.7 4.4 ·6 4.6 4.5 4.4 9.7 ·1.7 9.6 ·1.4 ·tis ·6 4.9 ·11· 9.5 '1.8 3.0 3.4 2.5 '2.5 '2.5 *2.2 *2.3 *2.5 '2.4 '2.5 *2.3 '2.2 *2.4 *2.5 '2.5 *2.4 *2.1 *1.9 '1.8 *1.8 '1. C)E I0.8 *2.1 16 10 *3.4 *3.3 *3.4 '14 *3.3 *3.4 *3.4 '3.5 '3.3 14 13 *3.5 *13 *3.3 *3.5 *3.1 *2.7 *2.3 *2.0 *1.4| ·3 b.4 *3.1 7.7 *5.2 .r?·11b.1 = ·s.9'5.6'I00 +3.9 *5-6 il [1 0.1 ).1 9.6 ).1 *5.7 *4.7 4.7 '5.5 *5.5 *5.6 9.2 .4.7 4.9 *5.7 *5.4 *5.7 *4.7 4.7 *5.0 I *4.7 9.4 *U-'41 f 6.3*5.4 ·0.1 2 8 5.5 5.0 48 4.8 5.8 i,F 4.8 3.3 6.0 4 5.9 4.4 5.9 4.4 A INGRADE ROUND LED GLOW UGHT RECESSED LED STEPmALL LIGHT WALL MOUNTED LED SCONCE D WAI MOUNTED LED AREA LIGHT E RECESSED CEILING MOUNTED LED DOVINLIGHT 6' WET F POLE MOUNTED LED AREA LIGHT G WALL- MOUNTED LED CYLINDER DOWNLIGHT M RECESSED LED LEAR LIGHT 0.6 40 '0.0 40 ) 12 M *4.b2.5.1.0 10.0 +.0'5.3 *5.Q_*4.6 ' .0 *0.0 *0.0 : 114 0 '0.0 p 9..5.0.0 .0 I 81*.5 b.5 *0.2 , SLV WETSY SERIES LIGMAN FW)03 SLV KY!(LOP WALL GARDCO 101L LIGHTOLIER LYTEPROFILE DOWNLIGHT GARDCO SLENDERFORM CONTECH CYLB LUMENWERX VIA WET LED LED 120 INGRUDE 5 2800K UED 120 RECESSED WALL 15 300OK be % LED 120 SURFACEWALL 6 30OOK e.o· LED UNIV SURFACE WALL 28 300OK 17. LED UNI RECESSED I 300OK 174/G LED UNIV POLE MOUNT 127 400OK le. LED 120 SURFACE WALL 20 300OK 14·-0 AFG LED UN'RECESSEDCLG 25 350OK 17/ AFG GARAGE ENTRY.-9.3 12 *3.4 '3.4 12 *3.3 '3.3 '3.4 12'3.3 *3.2 *2.3 *2.4 *2.42.4 *2.2 22 *2.4 *2.4 *2.4 *2.3 *2.14/G:9%. *1.0 *33 '4.424.3 .1.F *1.0 1.0 ?. *1' *1,4 '1.0 '1.6 '1.0 '1.5 '1.4 :21.0 '2.1 2.7 9.5 *O.7 b.4 *0.9 '2.3 *5.8 *2.2 *0.9 *0,6 *0.9 *1.2 '1.6 '1.6 '56,d *L *g4.**11 +04 · 1 7•03.1 '5.1 *1.7 '0.6 *0.3 '0.8 *2.gl.0.3.0'1.3 ..r '1.1 '4.7 3 0 b.5 '0.2 *2 '0.5 1.6 '0.6 '0.6 '11 -5.7 4 *b.3 *0.2 *Le·22 '*k2 *0.2 ' '3.4 9.3 '3.3 *3.4 '50 %0 2.1 4:r-4:1| 4,=ra o *2.4 14 14 *2.4 *2.0 *1.8 IU NI 9 k:2 ' **p *0.21, - 11.0 2 .0,2NA •18 •1.6 7, ;1,3 '1£ b - :-R 6.0 h *0.0 9(11.1,1. O ·61 00-1 UE=cl -10 0 .5 0.0 0.0-1 -r f T'r ,* n 'n 1 |,0 0 *0.1 +U %.2 0.3 0.3 9.1-9.220.2 0.0 60.2 0.7 0.8 *0.1 70.6 *2.2 *2.3 *0.1•CH.3 *5.1 *0.1 lif2 *2.3 . *0.0 '0.1 '0.7 *0.8 *0.0 *01 '0.33 '0.4 *0.0 0.1 *0.7 *0.8 *0.1 0.6 *2.3 *2.3 *0.11.2 '5.0 0.0 *0.5 *2.1 *2.1 6.0.0.1 *0.6 *0.7 -*1 *0.97 *0,8 '0.6 *2.0 &.8 *2.0 1.2 2.1 2.8 29,2.6 6 l Eng 1 J DECORATIVE POLE MOUNTED LED BEGA UED lili POLE MOUNT 57 AREA LIGHT 77022 3®GK 18'-0- MOU' TING REVIATIONS AFF· OVE FINISHED FLOOR AFG. MOVE FINISHED GRADE BFC · BELOW FMHED CEILING RFD.RECESSED FIXTURE DEP™ GENERAL NOTES 1 MANTAIN FRE RAING OF ALL PENETEUTED UL ASSEMSUES. PROVIJE EZ BARRER FUTURE HOUSING AS REQURED. b.8 b.5 b.303 94 k 8-4*3 '0.11*t° 1.4 .O.8 '0.41'0.2 *0:ti*°'|' 1 [ 31.3..1 '0.1 '0.0 2.1 *0.9 *0.4.b.2 'g.? [4f :.8 '0.1 *0.0 'C1.4 b.7-%3'-O.2 4.5 --.91*-= 'g ,1 21 71 1 0.7 *0.5 b.3 -0.2 **11 ''b.29.1 b.1 'CLO-urr-7- I i 1 212 .0.00.5 *0.4 0.2 0.7807 *0.5 *0.3·0-2 *R __] L I ,/76. -2-.14.4-.'1 I P UB,»ar'.lf---1.4 *0.7 *0.3 1.2 *1.06 i ·51 0.1ZONELOTLI.11 Bh L_ L '-1 rATYPN|1 122 *00,[:90.2.0 ¥.20.2 1.3 *0.7 1)|ih 4 I-e-r M B 1 -r * / TY[B TYP.-B TYP.aL, 0.6 *0'0-2ki -MUNU*.. G.tl-1.---6@- *o-i- ._, -\I-1 1 /. f f -O.2 -0.6 -0.1 -0.8 -0.0 -O.4 0.1 26.2 *0.t'C-..5 .0.7'.0.1 9.65*44-*244:2 *4.2 4.2 *4.2 *3.P0.7 '0.1 11 *0.1 15 *i.*Il;1 -02 *0.1 03 *0.2 *11*1.7 '0.2 *0.1 *0.0 *0.1 *0.6 2.61.15 *2.6 *0.6 *0.1 '0.0 *0.1 *0.7 9.([31 9.3 9.1 *0.7 *0.7 *7 *0.8 '3.92. '4.3t.#t.=·.e1f'9·9 1.8 *0.5 *0.2 AG 4 0.6 *0.2 '0.3 9.3 *4.4 9.0 *1.2 *0.3 *0.1 '0.2 .0.7 '2.0 .6.1 *2.0 *0.7 0.2 .0.1 *0.2 '0.7 5.3 *5.9 '1.8 b.6 *0.2 *0.1 *0.1 3 0.0 *0.1 1.:40.3 .0.2 IC-'0.1 NOTES 0 -03 -0.0 1 2.3 1·4 0.3 2.5.3 1 23 1 12.2 .5 '0.7 *p.3 1.13G HNIO . Statistics Description Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/MIn Avg/Max Site +1.4 fc 8.0 fc 0.0 fc N/A NIA 0.2:1 Upper ParkIng Area +3.0 fc 7.0 fc 0.3 fc 23.3:1 10.0:1 0.4:1 GENERAL NOTES 1. ANY PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURES INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE ORIENTED IN SUCH A MANNER OR LIMITED IN LUMEN OUTPUT TO PREVENT GLARE PROBLEMS AND SHALL NOT EXCEED NATIONAL I.E.S. LIGHTING STANDARDS FOR DISABILITY GLARE. O DETAIL NOTES LG -0.8 -2.1 -4.3 11 -0.8 -0.3 -0.5 1.4 17 -3.5 1.3 -0.4 -0.1 1 -1.6 0.7 0.2 0.2 0.5 1 PROPOSED FIXTURES ARE PART OF CITY STREET LIGHTING PACKAGE AND ARE :I CALCULAMON.SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. EMITTED LIGHT NOT INCLUDED IN PHOTOMETRIC ||5 *0.3 b.3 *0.6 '2. ; 61 09]4.7 .11,.O.3 '0.1 0.1 -0.2 -0.6 -2.6 6.1 -2.52.7 9 0.2H- H 22 4.3 '0.9 '0.2'0.1 '0.1 0.2 *0.6 *2.6 2.1 ' H - '0.0 8 *0.2 *0.6 '2.411 2.3 D.4 '0.8 '0.2 « - *40 .0.1 *01 .5 02.1 1 t < " ti L - f L lv' 1 - - *0.2 *0.7 2.4 4.3 4.8 4.8 9.4 9.1 9.1 2.5 4.8 2.7 4.1 *:f 1 *0.2 '0.2 ** 2. ' 1 l -7-I L 0 0 l ri-, J Oil - -- 10 -0.0 -0.1 4191111 ZONE LOT LINE j PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SCALE V = 30.-0. ISSUED: 4/27/2017 Kimley>)>Horn SA+ R YX?FJ!3 /v'V PHOTOMETRIC PLAN WE 38 CONSULTING INC SHEET 16 OF 19SMEARS A[KINSROCK.MORE 303/1271 ..C ET WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN J Il Cr C:\Users\ionk\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_9780\PH-PHOTOMETRIC.dwg jonk 04.27.17 7:38 am 12/7/2016 6:43:08 PM J:\2016\2016-069-00\Cad\Elec\PH-PHOTOMETRIC.dwg *e> - 60 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1 0. - FIXTURE TYPE A -FIXTURE TYPE B -FIXTURE TYPE C -FIXTURE TYPE D --FIXTURE TYPE E -h FIXTURE TYPE F MANUFACTURER' MOUNTAIN STATES LIGHTING PART #30RTS 7.2/3-6' SGL HER MAST-ABC-HH-AB-PICK COLOR - .e- N.T S.N.T.S.(£1/C.,j N.T.S.N.T.S.cu/N.T S.(v/N.T.S -.Mountoin States 28889 Series Cutoff LED Fixture -fu¥wi M•<f'P•jAh&R-'T t DIST TYPEVerify LED Court ond Distrioution Type per Job (ON 3'OD X 3·HI) TENON) DESCRIPTION OF ITEN 30' Round Tapered Steet Pole, FIXTURE TYPE G OPTIONAL; GFI DUPLEX RECEPTACLE W/ TATMACML-400G ·[N USE· WEATHERPR[I]F COVER POLE SPECIFICATIONS: P[1£ 37 MELITAIN STATES LIGHTING Ou,sae D"et" - 4.5' Haterkll - AN,-Iwn Pole /th Aerhor fant= cover /* 1/ckness 22· MINIMIt.M EP• - flinv• 20 1,• 80 1041 zon•Pe,t *12102•-,4 54220>-TEN,yx/--CrIC,1-VI-GAL-Bk <131*5'ClM,4.,4#b MaiVWArim, r™ISH BLACK PLINTED N.T S. Pa.£1 Or -SI,VT, ROL»l» SmAI'3¢T STEEL [P• *DRM 11.5 EPA 4 9'1 -11. 13 . E;£39%hr=:4....1. a- PAINT FINIS/, Egpurety:== i-HAN]H]LE 2 1/2· X 6· 1 2 FN[HOR fLALE_n[IALL 30':1 I f 23=27-al:1£E..ELAILIIAIL Il '60'MET,2- *33-= '7 \ ..............8 .......·1• Ir.... -1 ./ 110'...../-./. Woul,™11 •,A're, LK),mxo r "*10'OLE ,· . 6 04 - 4. r=%&=30 F.. -40-50. AL; 2#* -*- LED /-0-1 ** St,4; A *r- Pote/PulilED111.1 1.6 -Il ......ll, Wt. - 0 IN 1D 1 ITS 2/25/15 PMP 3001$-7.2/3881-wR/7 „rs 841,14 Ff 1/SPA-C/89-li-20t• : e -Tf . mT,e - mi®23@fy)33 Mkkn# St,te/Mo-,tal .0.- FIXTURE TYPE H N.TS. FIXTURE TYPE J N T.S CITY PEDESTRIAN POLE NTS - CITY STREET LIGHTING POLE NTS ISSUED: 4/27/2017 Kimley>*Horn SA+R YKE,/VV LIGHTING INFORMATION WE 38 CONSULTING INC 4NOPECOSS™EET UIT CE.lac....O K,SHEET 17 OF 19Sl'EARS A.Kill ROCKMORE -]25-1 -% WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN C \Users\jonk\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_9780\PH-SITE CUTSHEETS.dwg jonk 04.27.17 7:38 am 12/7/2016 6:43:08 PM J:\2016\2016069-00\Cad\Elec\PH-SITE CUTSHEETS.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO - %. En I LD- C[X]El K COIOJT SUED '80%€ M CONOET BASE 91All . GRC TYPE ....TH J - 18'-0' AFG 1£4=3/'»IS OF ALL BASES /1.Li GE A' POLE BAl CEVAnals H-HOLE CO. POLE BASE CO\ER -E-- PVC Dimi I 7-- GROI//BASE-NON glaNK / 4 4119 NE=-7./Pa.E---·fiTT: f 0.0' 0,4 1.42 r. 6 1.7 j .0/0.5 0/ 0 :,2' t/6 5.5 1.4 16 b.3 0.0 b.2 2.0 12.3 &.3 1.3 0.6 b.4 0 0 0 1.0 b.5 &.9 /I-AAAd-tir n'Ir\/ 0..1.0 2.3 2.4 1.4 0.9 0.5 O. -' _IL_ _ _ -:g:J Y 0.)3.2 6.2 4.0 1.8 7.5 0 0 0 0EEE .5 1.8 2.0 1.6 11.6 13.3 1:.8 OC Or Or O+0+ 73 3.9 71.2 / .\ / 1 /7?:31 I / 36 1. 6 b /3 /1=:2=. 4 4/1 12 / /1==4 / n 11,< 3'izy. 4 g Jl 1111111 4- 1 + /ukuja•0.0 1 2 11 11 'L.u 1:,:I L F U 11 1= -jb. 0 -121 r -nimr,·r· 0.4 )74G#LILLILLI,-F 3 111 D t 21 5 AS '/OU.ED./ PVC SCH 400€U'T HAHOLE .g U 71 - ALREff," 0 r-7 Ir 4 k= dII b.2 1.0 \4·6 11.8 4.4 5.8 4 -=-3-\ 11 7 1 \.1 c jul-a .7 3.5 O.) h 3 -1.0 1.9 -*3 0 1.4 _ 0 0.0 il T 0. o b. d - 1/ ... DIA...... BOLTCRCLE DINETEN OF THE POLE AS TIE - / --/ 011'll' OF M POLE "51 Trri).0.b.7 0.6 i 1' 0.4 0.1 1.3 ty. 8 0.5 0.3 | 0.J{ 0.2 0.1 1111< 1 11 <t b.4 '(( b. 4 b.3 1*2121: Ux 1/ /O 4/ .,0 in 0J J 0.)0.3 1 /Th TYPE "J" POLE BASE DETAIL 4:f:># SCALE: N.T.S.0.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 m hn h n LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE MANUFACTURER DESIGNATION DESCRIPTON LAMPS VOLTAGE OTY. TYPE DESIGN BASISTOTAL VA CATALOGNAME SERIES MOUNTING OTHERS TYPE HEIGHT REMARKS f27 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" - 10'-0" O WALL PAO(LED 120 12 BEGWS 33530 WALL VERIFY EXACT HEIGHT MI ARCHITECTURAL E Ce(OPY FIXTURE LED 120 31 8EUS 55927 CEI.NG 1 / J STE LeITD•G SNGLE HEm LED '20 I BEGA-US 77022 POLE 18-0' J, SITE UGHnNG SINGLE MID LED 120 57 BEGA·US 86851 WALL 4.-0. VERIFYEDITHEIGHT#TH ARCHITECTURAL Calculation Summary Label Units Avg Max Min Avg/Min Max/MinCalcType OVERALL GRID Illuminance Fc 1.71 13.3 0.0 N.A.N.A. CANOPY Illuminance FC 8.40 13.3 4.4 1.91 3.02 PARKING AREA Illuminance Fc 1.91 11.3 0.2 9.55 56.50 R ITE LIGHTD•G SNGLE HEAD LED 120 57 BE//US 77022 POLE M STANCHION MOUNTED ON WALL ISSUED: 4/27/2017 CSI-184 Kimler»Horn S A-1- R YY?91#E DET=,EP Flw=RREE (VECTRA BANK) PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ople who ! sten des,qi· 14:31 :72.k.SHEARS ADKINSROCKMORE .L/COLORADO SHEET 18 OF 19 WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TYPE 'D'TYPE 'E'TYPE 'J' & 'J2'TYPE 'Jl' BEGA IP 65 e VAH= BEGA Product data aheet Wall luminalre 33830 Product data sheet Recessed celhg lum&,ali |P 85 *56927 Wall luminalies with aiymmet,Ical light distribulonLED PoW top lumin/res with asymmetrical light dIst,lbutlon .......Un.....101 ,O-on¢-t,8-./V,NI-1 Ah,r,-,rmdeold,ca.-/4 ./.*--a./*SA Th-d LEI>1*¥1-*#* dec*-*aa,#bwp- =-nc¢01 I ./ wre 're Ur-e r-, / .·1„n./en Ne- 195rna'ON rre,·311.,T•L===L LEDPO- 14** * 220 240¥ t 620 00- O%1cont-b git-'.v-jet, EE- C€ C*rT•yrr. AO»ct · I.'-/.rl/*. Em=t=k. :=t,%:n=Ir=.110 ==1===rjou --d//- 2232/6,/. ES:=2==' 84=.100/In 55====.2.0." 5.U= r- D.. *N-.-//0,0,/Ill,k,-,TI Type: Drn,niruln.·25· 11,3,)./ -.-.m /*1 -*...m-SEGA P,oduct:®,cu,noId a*un =a -0./. - s-a. *-...(,th,- ..... -q po-a Prolect: slpmle. #-11 8,-r--0-1 -,rwun -c-d ',Ibltage: Color: ***mc*-=00102.=Options: Modited:/300.0 /:-/0/IM* En....¥,-de-g-, 4-•:k........ *- c,*1 -n ,8-0 I - 14 =- *0,114-*-3-*00-4 mx.e, c·•-6. t-rg •r-jed,lco.t,0-4 .- *c*m alle,om o• go'. ....60./ LED.In-. 575./TD'./ -30'C-r. * 12:W -,1,' 277¥ ti,chne LED,h- 010· --*9 /0 ,M411.--I .mCloly ./ -7 Cm..%1// 2(X]CK .C#lk *•All... N- LED-*---10 - d,-,c r-, of LED *frokoo LED L -le-,r na /- • Ula v9,»ge./.c:=«/IMOA.6 F./.1,00.,1,-,1·elk,1 d- 0-» r- 10 ,-,.b»uL com. F- . I. al. -Il P••=Pe•c• C- ./ *-wn 3.,f*- A.I ../1-·d-,1 81* col,n et 0LIQ: b',»m,ln - man S- 1@.4 's-4. •10 44a„opr...c.-gr..nt-C-mccbs,-©PI,don --0- w*wbega·..Com Hou-, 0. pece *-1 --,r./*....d Type: BEGA Proauct an.y.:-10 - ./. 3 2.40.,pe ./. b. Cl•C-.-1-*.*--ls.#Co¤-Project: ccll- A300.0 r*VA *.kltage: Color. options: · ·· · Mo<Nned: b neged th# co-nr uire 0 104'd 'C/0 "ter•U·ch-or./.01· 7.encl-cr-,1-a€01d P--04. ..... -bc...... --bl, I 120V. 208V NOV. Of 277/ .=* coal * rl*--11 8 ral *k-- 4,1-,/# =* B - -BLA V#z,21 S- Slv% Tes-,6 Idd.ce-*Ic-00 -e,e, amt» colon pkl./ 4- .- =-tenc'= Pa -281, n·- - A/ 182 I *,un *-/ Ur*-1, cd 11» 41)•-*-cle--: 810• No '..... 81(A· 50 Url=- ¢10. 50 b·r,I- CleA 50,*.. 11,8. ./.I-./.c-./t..148. A000-t..25/ L..45/ LEI}031./. 3000/ ===R,>00 2[no,1 L.....'In/ne -053. 14,f- k,n-,lk*,Cv ..,1 .... 33=K4 L03'll' 400OK />80EE2,101, 0135. U....k.r.... */*I.460.f. U.1.1...... Arrit- tnp-st-L.15. -/ .*IL..0 - , 500,000 L/0850 rltl,rtt,nalue L• 25 C . 80.DOD//9085 0 -> 500.00011' L70850 rr=. -nt- 1,1,p-an t.- 46 I -. Imol ...O -. 185m,--70830 Co./. r,-8n 3000 KAk.0,-t,b-*XX}Kenre,*-1 300)K--2-rare- 4000K-110*r'Ine., IU BEE?,7 *./.1...-* t57#60-,, p,g-, Ct•'4 U *, 0,**g 10*e -« VO-, ,•d EUL./T ...........1/In le BEG•¥.et} rP•nwbegic"¥1 59===L- 10- PO-.**1*1-10/ 1.. .v.**DI 0 67*. E: u 12/1 W'.'...Ur.... ".*.I .927- u EE -0-em*rm LI,1-of- L= 253W *I'./"//I.....15/ 30.5/ -/ 50.000/LeDB10 6... - 01 leo./. L70850 L..Mt ,•.,irl- 1¥-*6-25 12 -/ 50,000•:.80/10 DO*43/830 -/126.00011 L 708.0 .=.1imm..25. SU./W Cclou -,=*11 3000 K Aaomhbl,v.11,4000)Kon-,-1D.OE 6.-26.. 3090. Col:*10*Cr W- 188' . I'll- -.*.runb.56.1 ./W •thle lk.nb- I W ©SA c-dto US. * 0,*.an,-lar... Ill' R,r -1 ..t. Actric•c-,Pel .....31* ER,et- P I,0-1 Ar- 1'*65 le Como i A .R noe ..4/ LE .....„,le'. Beal. u, 1000 8EGAW*,CIn,r. CA 930,3 (006)684.0/. FAX (005)508 0474 ©caprill.8106 L,3.10 LJ»,0,02'10 iv Ll? l--I.C o 1 180/ =-17 MM·•3000 13 04. ./ - 810.-u, 1000 BEGA my. Carl'/crIL CA 93013 (805)664 063/ FAX {805) 506-9474 0,ri.SEG•.... upe-d.·'6 *4·w beg,ul com GENERAL NOTE: 1. ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES TO BE FULL-CUTOFF ISSUED: 4/27/2017 CSI-184 Kimley»>Horn S A+ R 16741#E IrTMEIMP JCAA (VECTRA BANK) PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING CUT-SHEETS4100 Wadswora Bk. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE p 303.985.3260 SHEET 19 OF 19.r[,1,1 'ho listen de·"ir' 6.-0 .Te ike 1,/COLORADO WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, CUP-16-02 - WEST END 38 SITE PLAN Scan Notes: Scan provided cross references memos to all four case files: O WSP-16-07 ¤ CUP-16-02 O WCP-16-04 O MS-16-08 Scan all files to WSP file, including divider sheets (eg "pre-app PC hearing") Upload West End 38 large format files to Laserfiche (they are currently located in Planning + Comdev + Plans & Plats) O West End 38 Concept Plan O West End 38 Filing No 1 0 West End 38 Site Plan WE- 38 0 X.Q«) 424,7 to U J-- kN--' LITY C 02,--6.,3 i:W· 1,!3 0-0.00 .C 1 00 Devgz- ZZ-Z-UTI I A. TIF Docs l t€*Fl 1 ly. 4 City ofY. wheatilt}ge -- OFFICE OF THE CrrY MANAGER Memorandum TO: THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Ken Johnstone, Community Development Director Gerald Dahl. City Attorney July 26.2016 (for Study Session of August 1,2016) West End Project: 38'h and Upham As you will recall, the developer of the West End project to be located at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street is proposing a redevelopment of approximately 3.67 acres of property at that location. with street-fronting ground-floor retail shops and restaurants and two levels of residences above for a total of three stories. The final architectural design has not been finalized and may be amended as the project proceeds through the development process. On the projects western edge. a new freestanding bank building and behind these two buildings will be a parking structure and a four-story residential building. This property is within the West End 38th Urban Renewal plan area approved by City Council on December 14,2015. On October 20,2015 the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority ("Renewal Wheat Ridge") entered into a Redevelopment Agreement with the West End developer for the sharing of property and sales tax increments from the project. in a total maximum amount of $4,800.000. As Council is aware. in November. 2016. Ballot Question 300 was approved by the Wheat Ridge voters. amending the Wheat Ridge City Charter to require a hearing before City Council for any sales and/or property tax increment financing arrangement and. if that arrangement exceeded $2.5 million, a City wide election to approve the same. The October 20. 2015 Redevelopment Agreement was approved prior to the approval of Ballot Question 300 and is therefore exempt from it. The Redevelopment Agreeinent provides for two sources of financing to the project: property tax increments and sales tax increments. Based upon the pro forma submitted by the developer. the property tax increment will be approximately $and the sales tax increment will not exceed $ 1.900.000. This is because of the limited amount ofretail activity which will take place on the site. The property tax increment, pursuant to state law, is paid directly to the Urban Renewal Authority. Under the October 20, 2015 Redevelopment Agreement. the Urban Renewal Authority then reimburses those property tax increments to the developer. However. the sales tax increment is collected by the City and then remitted to Renewal Wheat Ridge which in turn remits it to the developer under the Redevelopment Agreement. The mechanism by which the City agrees to pay the sales tax increment to Renewal Wheat Ridge is the "Cooperation Agreement" entered into between Renewal Wheat Ridge and the City Council on December 14,2015. Accordingly. while the October 2(). 2015 Redevelopment Agreement is not a subject to Ballot Question 300 (now. Charter Section 12.1 0). the Cooperation Agreement is, since it was approved subsequent to the November 20]5 election. Charter Section 12.10 now restricts TIF payments by requiring a Council public hearing and action on the same. and if the T]F payment is over 2.5 million. a City-wide election. Here. while the properly tax payment being made by the County to the l_li-han Renewal Authority is not governed by Charter Section 12.10. the sales tax increment payment is. Because the sales tax increment payment pursuant to the December 14.2015 Cooperation Agreement is less than S 1.9 million. the West End developer. in order to obtain financing. has asked for confirmation of the sales tax increment amount and the application oiCharter Section 12.10 to those payments. The Cooperation Agreement does not break out the relative property tax and sales tax increment payment amounts. and the developer has proposed an amendment to the Cooperation Agreement which details tliat the maximum amount of any sales tax increment payment to the developer would not exceed St,9 inillion. While Charter Section 12.10 will. of course. require a Council public hearing to approve this amendment. because the amendment specifies that the sales tax payment is substantially less than $2.5 million. a further City-wide election will not be required, The West End developer has drafted a proposed amendment to the West End 38"' Cooperation Agreement detailing these facts and specifically limiting any sales tax increment payments to not exceed S 1.9 million. Staff u ill have copies of this proposed amendment available for Council's review at the August 1 " study session. and it-direction is given to proceed. will bring those buck to Council for formal action at a regular Ineeting Because the Cooperation Agreement is a binding agreement between the City and Renewal Wheat Ridge. the Board of Renewal Wheat Ridge will be requested to review the amendment to the Cooperation Agreement and ratify the document also. No date has been set for this ratification. The Economic·s of Land Use d R 4(9-4 Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. 730 17th Street, Suite 630 Denver, CO 80202-3511 303623 3557 tel 303 623 9049 fax Denver Los Angeles Oakland Sacramento www.epsys.com - LAA L .1 C/b[AKk MEMORANDUM To:Steve Art, City of Wheat Ridge, Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority From:Andrew Knudtsen & Michelle Chung, Economic & Planning Systems Subject: City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis, EPS #153069 Date:October 2, 2015 This memorandum summarizes the feasibility analysis of Wazee Partners' WestEnd 38 proposed development in the city of Wheat Ridge. Economic & Planning Systems (EPS) has constructed a pro forma to assess the financial performance of the project with and without the inclusion of Tax Increment Financing (TIF). The following brief memo summarizes the findings based on this analysis. Background The development site is located in the City of Wheat Ridge, CO on the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street (see Figure 1 below). The site is approximately 3.67 acres. Existing structures include two single-family residential structures, an industrial building, and a free-standing bank. The proposed project, WestEnd 38, consists of street oriented-retail, multifamily residential rental units, as well as structured and surface parking. It will be among the first integrated mixed use projects in the city. The developer, Wazee Partners, owns three multifamily residential projects in Wheat Ridge. Wazee Partners has requested tax increment financing (TIF) from the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority in order to help finance the residual portion of the development costs not covered by the proposed debt and equity structure. 1 1 ,Th Le ,VV Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 2 Figure 1 Site Context A L-4 -_.1 , .mral. m= % m.mor 44·· "...4 1 f:4F "44 L -71 11 TIF is a "value capture" financing tool used by city agencies such as urban renewal authorities. TIF works by directing the incremental growth in property and sales tax revenues generated by a project back to the project to help finance public improvements. In a TIF structure, the tax base is "frozen" at the start of development and any property and sales tax growth that is created above this base can be used as gap financing by augmenting the funds available for debt service. In order to evaluate the necessity of TIF for WestEnd38, EPS has conducted a baseline feasibility pro forma model for the development. The model accounts for the full range of development costs and revenue projections and documents measures of performance. The model reflects current market conditions and accepted levels of financial return based on the level of risk and potential amount of public assistance. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using the feasibility model to document project performance with and without the public financing. 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 3 Development Program Along 38th Avenue, the project will feature ground floor retail with two levels of residences above for a total of three stories. The current bank will be reconfigured to front 38th Avenue. Behind both buildings will be a parking courtyard and a four story residential building. The project will consist of approximately 150 residences and approximately 13,800 square feet of neighborhood retail space. A parking garage will provide an estimated 138 parking spaces and there will be another 88 uncovered surface parking spaces (Figure 2). Figure 2 Site Plan and Renderings as of September 25, 2015 rfi I ··1 h t. 32·L 33-1 -1 - 4.1 SECOND LEVEL 7 i errt' ' /:tr- ,....£< -211 »•r....'*'I All. 113.-«f29,041 -9/,tz-- i FIRST LEVEL **·,4. „' 41 tise,y ,• 46 KEPHART Real estate trends in the Denver metropolitan area suggest walkable street-oriented commercial and multifamily residential uses are in demand. The location of the site positions the development to benefit from the growing commercial activity of the 38th Avenue corridor. Furthermore, the location can potentially benefit from the residential market attention of Denver's Highlands neighborhood immediately east. The developer expects full occupancy of both residential and commercial units within 18 months assuming 7.5 percent vacancy at stabilization for the residential and 10.0 percent vacancy at stabilization for the commercial units. EPS generally agrees with these assumptions based on observations of recent market conditions in similar emerging areas in the Denver Metro (e.g. certain neighborhoods of Denver, Arvada, Thornton, Northglenn, and Westminster); however, the lease-up schedule within the first year has been modified to reflect the project's relatively early entry into the Wheat Ridge market. 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 4 Feasibility Model EPS conducted a "but-for" analysis, which evaluates the development's financial feasibility with and without TIF. Standard metrics of real estate performance, including net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and return on cost (ROC), were utilized to provide objective standards for reviewing feasibility. Based on the development program as of September 2015, total project costs are estimated at $36.3 million. As shown in Table 1, hard costs are approximately $27 million (75 percent), soft costs are $6.5 million (18 percent), and other costs, which include land purchase, are $2.8 million (7 percent). Table 1 Project Costs Description Amount Hard Costs Demolition/Abatement $290,869 Utility Relocation/Burying $350,000 Site Work & Water Quality $1,698,169 Residential Structures $20,665,500 Retail Structures $1,649,238 Residential Parking $1,619,902 Retail Parking $761,009 Hard Costs Subtotal $27,034,687 Soft Costs Building Permits/Use Tax/Impact Fees Purchase Legal/Settlement Costs Studies, Due Diligence and Reports FF&E, Taxes, Insurance & Project Marketing Professional Fees (Architect, Engineering, Legal, Brokerage) Construction Financing Costs (Fees, Interest, and Legal) Soft Costs Subtotal $1,700,000 $140,108 $132,500 $622,500 $1,962,916 $1,946,474 $6,504,498 Other Costs Land Purchase $1,540,000 Lease Up, Contingencies, Required Reserves $1,215,375 Other Costs Subtotal $2,755,375 Total Project Costs $36,294,560 Source: Economic & Planning Systerrs H\153069 - Wheat Ridge TIF Analysis\Models\[153069-West End 38 Pro Forma 09-16-15.xlsm]T-Sources and Uses 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 5 Standard measures of performance were used to evaluate the feasibility of the project as proposed. • Net present value (NPV) compares the initial investment amount to the present value of the future cash receipts resulting from net proceeds, discounted by a 7.0 percent rate of return. The NPV depends largely on the scale of the project and the term of project. • Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the rate of return provided by the project for invested funds. • Return on Cost (ROC), sometimes referred to as cash-on-cash return, is the ratio of annual cash flow prior to taxes, at stabilization, to the total amount invested. Developments with ROCs greater than 10 percent are typically considered profitable in conventional markets. For the purposes of this project, stabilization is reached in Year 2. While investors each have their own preferences, ROC is a more reliable measure of performance because it does not preemptively predict a point of sale. 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 6 Measures of Return Without TIF As shown below in Table 2, EPS has provided measures of return for the project without the TIF. The sources of funds include construction loan of $25.4 million for a term of 18 months at an interest rate of 5.5 percent with a maximum loan to cost of 70 percent and cash equity of $10.9 million. Table 2 Financing Assumptions Description Amount Total Development Cost $36,294,560 Construction Loan Assumptions Construction Term 18 months Rate 5.50% Maximum Loan to Cost 70% Maximum Loan Amount $25,406,192 Permanent Loan Assumptions Average Annual NOI Yrs. 1-25 $2,556,589 Annual Debt Service $1,731,043 Debt Service Coverage (DSCR)1.41 Amortization 360 months Term 180 months Maximum Loan to Cost 70% Base Interest Rate 5.50% Construction/Permanent Loan (Mortgage Amount)$25,406,192 Equity $10,888,368 Total Sources $36,294,560 Properly Sale Year 18 NOI $3,073,458 Cap Rate 7.50% Sales Price $40,979,441 Brokerage Fees and Costs (2% of Sales Price)$819,589 Mortgage Payoff at Year 18 $15,181,834 Net Proceeds $24,978,018 Source: Economic & Planning Systems H:\153069 - Wheat Ridge TIF Analysis\Models\[153069-West End 38 Pro Forma 10-02-15.xlsm]T-Financing Assumptions At full lease-up, residential units are estimated to create an average of $2.78 million in revenue per year. Rent is estimated at an average of $1.65 per square foot per month (approximately $1,540 per unit per month), as shown below in Table 3. EPS believes the projected rents are reasonable for new wood-frame product in the Wheat Ridge market. Given the lack of 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx -941114- Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 7 development and the dearth of comparable properties, benchmarking rents off of similar projects is not an option. The proximity to employment, specifically downtown Denver, and proximity to services and entertainment, specifically 38th Avenue locally and the Highlands area to the east, are factors that will drive occupancy and stronger rents over time. For underwriting purposes, EPS believes that the projected rents strike a balance between the historically underperforming submarket and the strong trends in rental housing seen throughout the metropolitan area. Accordingly, the rents at $1.65 should be reasonable. The gross residential revenue is estimated to be $2.7M, as shown below in Table 3. Various factors have been applied to the gross estimate to generate the cash flows between Year 1 and the date of sale in Year 18. Factoring in the 18-month construction term and market absorption, Year 1 assumes 40 percent of units leased (60 units) and stabilized occupancy (less 7.0 percent vacancy) years 2 to year 18. Table 3 Revenue from Residential Units ,.A ¥ 1/K -0/410 0" 457Wb . r/'. Blok? livj:*'A Description #Units Size (Sq. Ft.)RenVSq. Ft.RenVUnit Annual Income per month per rnonth 12 months 1 BRM BA 75 850 $1.68 $1,428 $1,285,200 2BR/2BA 75 1,025 $1.61 $1,650 $1,485,225 Total or Average 150 938 $1.65 $1,539 $2,770,425 1/64 (A10 [1] Amounts show n above are for Year 1 at build-out. Proj. CF assumes 2% rent increase per year f rom year 1 to year 17 Source: Econornic & Aanning SysterrE LIAR -H:\153069 - Wheat Ridge TIF Analysis\Models\[153069-West End 38 Pro Forma 09-16-15.xism]T-Res. Prog. At stabilized occupancy, commercial units are estimated to create an average of $224,820 in revenue per year. Triple-net rent is estimated at an average of $18.10 per square foot per year (see Table 4). Retail revenue is accounted for in cash flows between Year 1 and the date of sale in Year 16. Factoring in the 18-month construction term and market absorption, Year 1 assumes 50 percent of units leased (6,900 square feet) and stabilized occupancy (less 10 percent vacancy) years 2 to year 18. Table 4 Revenue from Commercial Units Description Size (Sq. Ft.)NNN RenVSq. Ft.Occupancy Annual Income per year per year Retail Tenant #1 3,800 $21.00 90.0%$71,820 Tenant #2 5,000 $18.00 90.0%$81,000 Tenant #3 5,000 $16:90 90.0%$72,000 Total 13,800 $18.10 90.0%$224,820 [1] Amounts shown aboE are for Year 1 at build-out. Proj. CF assumes 1 % rent increase per year from year 1 to year 17 Source: Economic & Planning Systems H\153069 - Wheat Ridge TIF Analysis\Models\[153069-West End 38 Pro Form 09-16 15.xism]T-Con,n. Prog As shown below in Table 5, the project performs (without TIF proceeds) with an NPV is $3.7 million, an IRR of 9.3 percent, and a ROC of 6.3 percent. Based on industry standards, these metrics indicate a thin margin of return. Most investors and lenders would view this project as infeasible without some form of public financing overlay, such as TIF. 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 8 Table 5 Project Cash Flows Summary Without TIF Total Total Residential Income $53,334,529 Total Commercial Income $4,297,378 Total Project Revenue $57,631,907 Total Operating Expenses $11,613,308 NOI Before Debt Service & Owner Expense $46,018,599 DEBT SERVICE Construction Expenses Hard Costs $27,034,687 Soft Costs $6,504,498 Other Costs $2,755,375 Total Construction Expenses $36,294,560 Less: Construction Loan (18 months) $(25,406,192) Equity $10,888,368 Net Proceeds $3,971,461 Debt Service Coverage 1.48 Cash Flows $29,769,476 Present Value Net Present Value (NPV) $3,713,304 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)9.3% .lv Return on Cost (ROC) at Year 2 6.3% J M u Source: Economic & Planning Systems H:\153069 - Wheat Ridge TIF Analysis\M odels\[153069-West End 38 Pro Forma 10-02-15.xlsm]T-Proj. CFs NO TIF CONDENSED 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 9 Measures of Return With TIF EPS constructed the feasibility model to evaluate the project with and without TIF. The property tax increment is derived from per unit values reflective of the market today. As such, the residential units are estimated at $170,000 per unit in Year 1 increasing 1.0 percent per year, at an assessed value of 7.96 percent. Retail square footage is estimated at $200 per square foot in Year 1 increasing 1.0 percent per year, applied against an assessed value of 29 percent (per state propert:y assessment regulations). The local mill levy is set at 79.0781 and applied to the valuation of real estate. The resulting total property tax increment is approximately $3.40 million over 19 years. The sales tax increment calculation uses an estimated taxable retail sales factor of $300 per square foot at a sales tax rate of 3 percent. The resulting total sales tax increment is approximately $1.58 million over 19 years. The total increment generated by Year 19 is $4.98 million (Appendix B). Note that the EPS analysis calculates a total amount that is approximately $197,700 greater than the amount estimated by the developer by Year 19. This 4.1 percent difference is attributed to modifications to the taxing assumptions and are documented in Appendix B. EPS used different assumptions about lease-up and the timing of property tax and sales tax flows that yield a small difference in the timing of flows and the total amount likely to be available over the forecasted period. Specific differences include the following: • Property tax revenues are based on completion of improvements, regardless of occupancy and corresponding cash flows. Local county assessors will include newly constructed improvements on the tax rolls the year after completion (with revenues from property owners beginning the following year). While lease up and occupancy may take longer, it does not affect the obligation to pay property taxes. As such, EPS projects tax revenues to start two years following completion of construction. • Sales tax revenues at the city level reflect sales estimated for the anticipated retail tenant occupancy and will start immediately upon the tenant activating their space. As a result, Year 1 sales tax revenues account for 5,000 square feet of leased tenant space (50 percent of total sale tax-producing retail square footage), which produces $45,000 in tax increment in Year 1. The developer's requested TIF amount of $4.79 million can be covered within 19 years. • The difference is a moot issue, as the URA will limit the total amount of proceeds to the developer. The only question is that of timing. A stronger project that delivers higher cashflows and/or higher values will generate the requested funds sooner. 1 Mill levy includes mills for School (school general, school bond), County (county general, developmental disabilities, R&B services, social services, capital expenditures, and library), City of Wheat Ridge, Urban Drainage Flood District, Urban Drainage District S Platte, and Wheat Ridge Sewer District. 153069-Memo 10.Q2.15.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 10 Table 6 below shows the measures of return with TIF. The NPV is $6.3 million, the IRR is 11.0 percent, and the ROC is 7.0 percent. The full pro forma is provided in Appendix C. These measures are improved, and the project will perform with a stronger set of cashflows and coverage ratios. However, they do not elevate the measures to a level that compares to historic thresholds for viability. Based on work throughout the country, EPS knows that developers have been willing to move forward with projects with lower ROC than historic levels, in part because the cost of funds is lower (attributed to the Fed's commitment to maintaining a very low Federal Funds Rate) and investors' opportunity costs and relative attraction to real estate investment. Accordingly, the resulting project performance is acceptable. Table 6 Project Cash Flows Summary With TIF Description Tota I Total Residential Income $53,334,529 Total Commercial Income $4,297,378 Total Project Revenue $57,631,907 Total Tax Increment $4,976,859 Total Operating Expenses $11,613,308 NOI Before Debt Service & Owner Expense $50,995,457 DEBT SERVICE Construction Expenses Hard Costs $27,034,687 Soft Costs $6,504,498 Other Costs $2,755,375 Total Construction Expenses $36,294,560 Less: Construction Loan (18 months) $25,406,192 Equity $10,888,368 Net Proceeds $ 8,948,319 - Debt Service Coverage 1.64 Cash Flows $34,701,335 Present Value Net Present Value (NPV) $6,331,648 11 Internal Rate of Return (IRR)11.0% » tin. 3CJ Return on Cost (ROC) at Year 2 7.0% 11/1 Source: Economic & Planning Systerns H\153069 - Wheat RidgeTIF Analysis\Models\[153069-West End 38 Pro Forma 10-02-15.xlsm]T-Proj. CFs WITHTIF CONDENSED 153069-Memo 10.0215.docx Memorandum 153069-City of Wheat Ridge TIF Economic Analysis October 2, 2015 Page 11 Findings Based on the "but-for" analysis described, WestEnd 38 is infeasible without the injection of TIF funds. From a financial feasibility perspective, the pro forma under performs without the TIF and would not happen, but for the inclusion of TIF dollars. The resulting project enables the developer to fund elements, such as structured parking, that would likely be eliminated without the TIF. Thus, the overall yield from the site would fall, and the resulting project would have a lessor impact on the overall market on 38th Avenue. Other considerations include the following: • The proposed development improves the utilization over the current set of land uses. • The units that will be contributed to the city's multifamily rental housing inventory is estimated to command rates similar to those other thriving areas of Denver metro, and will elevate the current submarket as it competes on a regional basis. • The project will enhance the 38th Avenue corridor with additional street-oriented retail. • Finally, the Wheat Ridge URA can also expect returns from the development to meet the financial expectations shown in the pro forma. For these reasons, EPS finds that the URA can generate an improved land use and higher_*!&!51 from the site by approving the developer's TIF request. 1,41 Appendix Appendix A - Projected Cash Flows without TIF Appendix B - TIF Assumptions Appendix C - Projected Cash Flows with TIF 153069-Memo 10.02.15.docx 4 t IC i *-- 5)U r 1r WestEnd 38 214099 11 a . KEPHART Lauren Mikulak From:Lauren Mikulak Sent:Wednesday, September 30, 2015 1:26 PM To:Kenneth Johnstone CC:Steve Art Subject:West End Redevelopment Agreement Ken, We had a good meeting this morning to discuss West End 38. Just so you know they are anticipating two phases of reimbursement. Steve and I touched base before the meeting, so I think we're in a good place but just wanted to give you an update. Sally is trying to get a draft back out tomorrow or Monday so let me know if you want to discuss this before we get the next draft. • From our Chapter 26 perspective, the project will not be phased-based on what we know, 1 still think it's appropriate to process a single site plan and plat with no concept plan. • From a construction perspective, as you know, it will be phased with completion and CO for the bank building occurring first. • From a reimbursement perspective, it will also be phased. They have requested that the TIF start flowing after completion of the bank. They will have spent a substantial amount of their $4.8 in Phase 1, but their reimbursement will be limited by the increment created by property tax for the bank (aka incredibly minimal). Everyone was fine with this-as Corey said, it's the best worst case scenario...if the project dies after Phase I we get a majority of the improvements installed, but we're only reimbursing what little increment the site is producing. • Wazee is going to draft an exhibit that shows the public improvements that they envision constructing to "serve Phase I" (the bank). For the purposes of the conditions precedent to payment of the Phase I reimbursement it will read something like, "All public improvements to serve Phase I have been completed, as generally shown in Exhibit X and consistent with the City-approved site plan and SIA." • The SIA will then specifically identify what needs to be completed on the property for each CO (namely for the bank) similar to how we phased improvements at Kipling Ridge. Fortunately the bank is at the edge of the property, so it may be easier to delineate appropriate improvements. This morning we did not discuss the details of which improvements go with Phase I. I'm thinking we're in wait-and-see mode until Wazee drafts the exhibit of what they think should go with Phase I. Let me know if you feel otherwise. Thanks, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2845 Fax: 303-234-2845 www.ci.wheatridae.co.us .. , City of3 Vt/licat_ 1.1 icl<ye-,0•0- COMMUNIn' DEVill['MiNIC' CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail contains business-confidential information. It is intended only forthe use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, electronic storage or use of this communication is prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, attachingthe original message, and delete the original message from yourcomputer, and any network to which your computer is connected. Thank you. 1 REDES El.()1'JIENT *(;REE,IENI 1111% 1{1·[)FVE.1 ()PMENT .·\C ;RFITMEN-1 (111! "Agreement- ) dateil it* ,1 (kic,ber ggl 201 5. is niatle b> and belween \\ 111·Al RIDGF. I ;1414,·\NI RI·NI \\·AL Al I 11()1<ITY di,/a/ Rl·XI·WAI \\ HEA I RI[)(11. Lin lirlian renenal authority and a hod> corporate and politic ot the »tate 01 Colorado (tlic "Authorit>3 and \Vest I nd 38. LLC a ('c,h,rado hillited liabilit> coinpany (tlic -'1)e,el,per") 1 he Aitthorit> and De\cloper are sonietime# coNectnel> alled the .·-Parties. and indi, idually. :1*14,rt, REC 11-Al .0 All capitali,ed terms u.ed. bul not defined. 111 tlie.C I<Critill.. lia, C tile Ille:tiling. abilibed to them in this Agreement I he Recital. fire inc,ilic,i.ited to this Agreement a. tholigh fully fet furth iii ilic hod>· 01 this Agreement U 111·*REAS. the (71> 411' U hcal Ridge. Colorado (tile q it>") 1% a holic tulc illunicipalit> ani| 7,litical rubilivisian (,1- the State· 01 ( 'Moradu organized and e,Ning under a borne title ih:Illet pursuant 14, Allicle X.\ 01 the Constilittic,11 m the Stale lil'(9)1(,1-Laill). ;111(1 U 1 11<REAS. the ( 'il> C'(,inicil (,1 tlic Cit>0 (the "C in C (,titicil'h established the Allthority 4,11 c )ctober 18. 198 1 : and U 111·'REAS. an lilhan rellewal plan knou n a. the \\ e.1 1·11(1 38 Urhan I<ene„ al Plan (the U 1-Inin Renenal Plan- or the -I'lan") Ini# been prepared and u ill he con>.idered fur arm+ouil 11> the Cit> Council t,fthe Cit> pill-slla!11 to the requirement4 of Title .11. Article 25, Part I , Ccili,rado Res ihed St:ttlite. (the l.irhan 1<ene; .il 1.,t,C): and U lIEREAN. De,Cil,per has acquired title to. or has a letter of intent 14, purchase. till 1,1 the real propert> described 111 12,hibit A- 1 .ittached hereto, con»ting of Lipproumately 3.67 acre.. \4 h i ch i> lueated at t Iii* 1 2(11111\i e.t corner of \\ ext .18"' Aumue and Upham Street m Ilic City (the "Propert,- ). which Is u illilli an wihan renewal area and which IN in tile U est End 38 Ill- Area: und U HEREAS. De,eli,per has submitted a proposal ti, the City and the Autlic,rity to rede, elop tile lic,pelly as fullher set forth in 1.rhihit B .titached here·to (the "1'i-„ject-): and U 11 EREAS. the Authority has detcnnined thut the rede; elopment (11 the· Pil,Ject in order to remediate hlight is consistent with and in furlherance of the purposes of the Authority and the Urban Renewal Plan: and U HEREAS. in oriler 10 1.ici|it:ite the acquihilion. C<,11>,trilition and in>t,illatit,n 4,1 the Project. the Authority and Developer degre· to linance cellain Eligible Illiplmements related to the Pri,ject up 10 3 m:iximuin aggregate amount of Four Alillion 1-ight Hundred thousand Dollars 64,800.000) (as further defined helou. the -Reinil,tirxement Am<,lint- ) as et furth in this Agreement: and U 1 11·.REA>i. pursuant to the Act lind the Urhan Reticual I'lim. the Authont> ma> tinance undertaking> purhitant to the Plan h) an> method auth<,rited undet the• Act or :in> 4,ther applic.thle law. ilic|Ulling wit|lout limitation. Agrance of notch. bond. and other oblig.ilic,110 in an uniount hufficic!11 lo fill,ince al| 01 p.111 01' t|le Plan: lic,!-i-ou ing of fumb; und creation 4,1 mdel,tednes< ad, uncement 4,1 reimbut >ement agreements, agreement u ith public 4,1 1,11\ ate entities: and loans. adwinces and grants froni an> other autilable M,uices: and the Man authori/es the Authority In pay tile principal and interest on an> such indel,tedness from pri,perty and sales ta, increment.. or any t,ther funch. re, elilies. ashet. t,r ili,liertle> legally in ailahle to the Autill,rity: and U HERF. \%. the Urban Rene„ al Platt ec,ntemplates tilat u primar> method ot financing prl,lect# uit|lin tlic urhan renenal at-ea uill be through the use 01 property tax inclement rezenues and sale> tar increment re, ellue< and WHEREAS, the l rban Renes, iii Plan alli,us the use of tar Ii,cremelit 1111.incing related ti, tile propert> ta.\ :ind #ales ta, lor tile Pn,perty: and U HEREAS. De,cloper will minall> fund the design. acquismt,Ii. ci,listruction and 11101.illation 01 the 1·ligiblc liiipi-in enictil iii accoidance u i th thif Agreement: and 00 11EREAS. hublect 14, the terms and prousions of thts Agreement. Develt,per u ill he reimbur>ed for Eligible Costs incurred on the Eligible 1111prou·ments in ail amount equal to the Reimbursement Amount from the precced. of the Pledged To, Inerement Re, ellite. uener:lied b> tile Proicet ( 11 le -Pleclgeci lte, Clities'3, und U 1 1 1·* R LAS. the Authority u il l execute and liel i u'r u premissory note ( the "Note" ) 14, the De, eli,per to endence its obligation lo pa> the Reimbiti'cinent Amount. sublect to the terms und prtn ision:. 01 thts Agreement. \ihich Note miall lic :t pecial atid Ii,ilitcil i,liligittic,11 4,1 the Authority pin'able solel> lit,in the Pledged Revenues: and U HEREAS. the Parties hase agreed lo enter into this Agreement fur tile tedc\C|lipiliC'!11 01 thi Ii-opert>' m accordittice ,#ith the l :rhan Rene„ al I'l.in und the Act. NOW 1 1 IEREFORE. 111 conNI(leration of the mutual ci,\ ctiants und prumihe. 01 the Parties contained in this Agreement. und other aluable Consideration. t|ic receipt and adequacy of u hich are acknou ledged. the Parties agree to the terms and conditions in this Agreement. A(;It LEAIENT 1. 1)1·11\11 IONS. hi this Agreement. unle» a diftetent Illealling Cledil> Appears trom the conte\1. capit.111/ed terltr, Illeall: "Act" mean> ilic Colorailo 1 rhan Renewal I.au. Part 1 01 Article 25 4,1 htle 31 01 the ('idontdo |4'\ ihed Stlitch. il, amon|cd -Agreement" mean. thi. Rede, elopment Agreement. a. 11 ma> be amended or uppleillented m Miting, Reterence* 10 Xectit)114 Or 1 \111111 are 10 1111. Agreement unle» c,thens 1.e qualified. Al| eillihits attached to and retlicticed in this Agreement arc hereh> met,rpt,rated mto thi. Agrecmetit. -Authoi-ity" mean. \\ lical Itidic lithan Iteneual Authorit> ill, u I{clic\\ .il \\ heat Rilluc. all urban leneu al :lut|lt,rit> and a hod> Ctill,orate and politic (,1 the State (,1 Li,Icirado which has been dul> created. cirgilm/ed. e.tablished and authorited by the City 14, trallhdet husille» and exerci>e 11, power> 0% an urban reneual authority. 311 under :ind pur,<liant to the Act. and its hUCCC»Of> Alid 21$>41%114. "It<,ni'%-means. L-ollectnely. bolidh. Celliticateh Bf pallicipation. other obbgation. m hecuritle: 1%*lled by the Authorit> 10 1-cfinimce ir repa> the N„te in accurdance ,# 11|1 the term. and prin ifitins ot' this Agreement. including an> bond*. certiticate, 01 participatic,n. other ohligatitins or >,ecurities i:Nlled b> the Authorit> to refund an> such Bor« ''( it," Ilic,in. Ille ('ll> (,1 \\ heal Riclge, (7,11,1-ado. a home rule municipality and polilical ,ubili, 1.101 1,1. the State of C 'olorailo (,rgani/ed und eristing under 3 11(illie Iltle Challer put-All:1111 to Artie|c \ \ of the ( DIU,ttiltlion of tile :itate (,1 Colorado -Cit> Requiremen,C nicans, collectii cly. the Wheat Ridge 7<niing and De\ek,pment Code. Architectural and >hte Design Manual. Subdi, isic,11 lilli,rtnement Agreement. Streetscape Dehigil ManuaL Internatiumil (Building) (i,des. Site Drinnage Requitementh. and right-('|hun design slilliclards. except 214 111.1>' be amended by nilitual writlen agreement vt tile City and De, eloper tilt-oligh |and li,c. builihily .ind riglit-(11-wa>' pertilil ,1111,10\411* i,r ot|le,-11 Ge. C 0111!lielice C (,11*11*liction or '1 '(1111!llencement of ('Oill,tl'lli'lion" Ineum· the commencement b> De, eloper of actual physical -rk on the Prolect. iticluding withellt litllitation decc,listruction. delll(,lition and or site grading ,ii ilic Property a+ required fur the Prclicit. C omplete" or "Complete C <,11Ntruction" or N ompletion" or "Completion 01 CtonHri|aion" Ine,111% Coliwilictic,11 acceptance m accordance with the C it> Requirements, tile Subdniston Imprmement Agreement. applicable laws. c,rdinances. and regulalions 4,1 the Cil> and any olliel gmernmental entlt> or pitillic tilihly uith jurisdiction. Alilliect lt, an> applicable Conditumb of 111Llitllenance and warranty. mcillt|ing H ttliout linlitation. Ille i.sualice (,1 a pernianent celliticate (,1 uccup:inc> ur completion by the City. u 1111 or u itholit cimdition.. st, thal the porlion (,f the Project described in sNell certificate mil> oren fur permanem occupanc> :mil utili/.atioil ti,r it nitended purro>o. 3 -DefauIC or "1·jeni of Default" inean an> of the e·#ents de#cl-Il,ed in Section 16; prosicled. 11(nu'\ Cl. Iliat buch cients u ill not gi, c n.e to any remedy until ellect lia. been gn en 14, all grace peric,(14. cure peritic|. and period# (,1'enti,iced dela> pi-t,% Ided li,1 in tlit Agreement. "De,eloper- mean> \\ cv End 38.1 1 ('. a Colorado limited hithilit> compan>. and any Nucce»ors and a»lynx apprincd in accordiince u ith this Agreement. -De, cloper Ad„inces" means. collectisely. amount. ad, anced or incurred h> Developer to pay any Fligible (»ts "Effectist Date- Ille;lih tile date it this Agreement. -Eligible C asts" means. ct,11ectnel>·. Ilic reawnable und cuhtomin->' expenditurch for the acquiqtion. deign. ec,tist, uction and 111.1,11|ation 1,1 the |:ligible hm,Im ement:. ille|uding u ith<,lit limitation reasonable ami clistomary ,clft ci,M. und expenses. as *el forth in Exhibit C attitilied herell). a. 11 1118> be :illielided liereunder. 1· ligible Cobts :119, include. all leasonable Und eust„mary costs and ewen.cs related to the engmeering and dexign uork fur the Eligible Illipe,% ements The 111:1#lilium amount 01' Eligible Cohts to be paid or reimbur.ed pursuant to this Agreement diall he h,ur Alillion Fight Hundred 1 housand Dollars (44.xil<).00(1) as set lorth in this .·\141-eemenl "1·.ligible |Illi,tosenlent*"Ille,1114 the Imprmements set Iturth on Exhibit C attached | letric 1. ah amel Illed i n aCC< 11'llit tiCC ii it h thi . A gircment 1·hectitisc Director" ine:ins the Execulne I)irector ofthe ·\ulliorit> -hhibit," 1 he fullowing Exhibiti attached k, this Agreement are hereby incorporated into und made a part (11 this Agreement: Exhibit A-1. 1 egal Description ul Ilic I'loperty Exhibit A-2: I Cy:11 1)eNC!-lption (,I the West Fnd 38 TIF Area Exhibit B:Description 01 the Pro»·t Exhibit C: Eligible lii,provemetils LAhibit D:Form 01 Pri,ject Completion Certificate Exhibit E Fc,rm of N,le Exhil,it F:Form ofbubdi \ Nion Impn ,\ einent Agreement -Note" me·uns the promissory note e,ccuted and delivered by the Authority to Develt,per that ci idence. the obligation to pay the Reimburhement Amount iii accurilance with the tenns and prin isions ofthis Agreement. in substantially the furm of trhibit E attached to thi, Agreement. The Ni,le hall he a special and hmited obligatic,n of the Authority payable solel> frt,in the Pledued Itc\Clilles. Ii,le'lebt shaH 1101 accrue on the Nme. 4 1':trt," 01 Parlii·%" Ille.111> one or both oft|ic p,11'lle> 10 11114 Agreement. I'ledged Properh l a, Inclement Ite,enul·'' un.·an> the annual Ild i illore!11 propert> 1414 re, enue lecci, cd h> the Authorit> it l)111 tile Jeltur>on Count> 1 reabure! 111 eive» M tile alliount produced b> the le\ > 01 [lic,se la,ing bodies that len properl> ture. against the Propen> 1 a. Hahe Ailli,unt Ill the \Ve.1 End 38 1 IF Area in accoidance· i< 1111 the Act and the regulation: ofthe Propert> Tak Ulminhtrator ofthe State of ('i,|„rado, but th,t Ilic|ltillng, (21) an> Illill> imposed h> the \\ heal Ridge Fire District: and (1,) ain 4,114cts collecled by the ,|eller,it,11 Counly Treasurer- 1(,1 rellit-11 4,1' 4,\ erp.I>'ment. t,r an> reserve fund returned 1,> Ille· Alltlitirit> fur Nuell purpt,se. In .icct,iclatice U Ith Sections 31 -25-1()7(4)(:0(Ill) and (l,) 1,1 the Act I'ledged hale* lin Increment Re#enue<" Incans. lor each >cal thut thi. Agreement re!11,11110 In CHect. thal purtion 01 the Silles 1.1\ le, Cnile Ircened by Ille ('11>. and remitted tu tile Authoril> m accordance u ith the Act and Ilk· Plan. equal lo the product 4,1 tile· Sale. 1 A rate 4,1 tlit ee percent ( 3.t )( )<' c, ) 11 Ille> t|le allic,lilit c 't t|le la\Ilb|C 11 ,!liN.!Clic,!13 blihiccl lo t|le Sale* I .1 \ Ill the \\ e.t I nil 38 1 11' Ate.i. le» Ilie >kiles 1 41\ Ila·e Allil,lint I'leclged Re, enitef'' Ille.inh the Pledged 1 01 Ilicrellient Itereillic. 111 Ilic total aggregilte pttlicipal aniount 01 44.81)().C)(H) -I'ledged I a \ Increment Re, enuef" means. collecti, ch. the Pledged Propert> 1,1\ hicreincni Rc, et,Lic. and the Pledued Sale. Ta, hierement Itc, unites. irc}ject'' me:111. tile rede\elopment (,t thi· Propen>. as linlher Ket forth in Exhibit B attached hereto "Projeet Account" niea,14 tile account 4,1 ilic Special Lund cleated in Section 5.2 into u |lich the Aill|lt,nt> sliall deposit the I'ledged 1 21\ Incremi·iii Re\ctiuch. -Project C ompletion ( crtificale" Ineitib the ccrtilicate in sitlbtanlialk the furin m L.\|liblt 1.) ittl,tchi'(1 herch, la,!ting to the satislaction 01 the Conditionf pl'ccedi'!11 Ket huth 111 Sectic,11 1. I relating Ic) the p:!>'llient (,I the Reillillul'>Cilient Ainount -1'ropet-h" means the real propert> descnbed in L.xliibit A-1 itti:tched hereto. ulitch cc,lisists 01 :ti,lit„,imately 3.67 acres. The Property i. included in the West End 38 1-IF Area. Propi·rt, 1 8% Base Amount" me:ins the amount certified hy the Jefferson Count> A.se»or as the s aluatit,n ti,r assessment 4,1 all ta\able property uithin the West End 38 TIF Area in aect,rciatice with Section .31 -25-107(9)(a)(1) ofthe Act [lic lic,pert> [a, Base Amount and inerement , alue shall he calculated und adjusted from tillie to time b> the Jefferst,11 ('(,Unt> ANseSS(,r i ii accurciance w 1111 Section 3 1 -25-1 ()7(9) 4,1 the Act und the rule. and regulatic,114 4,1 the Pn,pert>' 1 A Administi'ator ofthe State i,f Colorado. -Reill,Inincment Amount" me:Ins .1 11161\111lum £1111(,Unt Cqual to 34.800,()00, uhich is tile !11:!,inium a]11(,lint that u 111 1,c paid to the De, eloper ti, reimhure the De# eloper for 1- ligible C 't,£10 m ace<,rdance H ith the terms and prn, itm,ns liere·of, No ill[CreNt .hall accruc .,n the Reillibul *emenl Amount 5 -Salt.g I in' meano the munic*al >ali·>. ta, 01 [lic ( ily im sale# 01 good> Litki .Ct-1 ICe. that are xubject to nuttilcipal Ail|Ch ta,es purillant to the Wheat Ridge Cit> Code. In the e·\ ent thal the Sales I .11 1% 11™equentl> increased abine 1 ()0°o. tile amount of Saleh Tar Nubject 11) 11114 A greement Aliall not he increased aht,\ e 3.00% unless (,1 heni Re aulhorved by the City Cou Iicil. :Sale„ 1 :i, 11:ice ·*niouril-' 1112£111% tlic total collection 01 Sales Taxes lezied .11 the rate 4,1 three percen! 4.3 009„) within tlic \Vest End h 1 It: Area fur the applicable luehe-month periml in accordance u illi Section 31-25-107(l)Ha)(1) 01 the Act I he Sale [a\ Ba.e Amoutiti 91 0(). -Special Fund" Ilicans the special fund ofulle Authont> defined in Sectit,11 1()7(9)(a)(11) 4,1 the Act -Subdi,ifian Imprcnement Agreement- 11]citli# Ih,11 Mul,di f ifion Imi,Ic,\ement Agreemenl fur the Pruk·Ct to be Sillitilitted 11> De\Cli,per tu the Cit> in sub41.ililiall> tile 11,1-m Net Ii,1111 hereto a. 10,11ibil 1- attitched hereto. "Czrban Rene,#:11 1'1:rn' (,r "Plan° me.in. thi' \\ est L.lid 38 l 4-han Rene\1 .il Plan .ipprowd h, tlic (il> C '(,uncil. a. amended trum time tu time. '10 ext End .38 1 IF Area" Ille.lib tile approumately 4.5.15 act-c. within which the Property iN h,cated and that N legall> described 4,11 thibit A-2. The West End 38 TIF Area th the same a. the urban rene„ al area described in the 1 'rbati Rene\# al Plan u ithin which the tar i iici-cment prin ision + of Section 31 -25- 107(91 4,1.the Act :ipply, 1-1\ANCING AND CONSTRUCTION 01· PROJEC'I. 2.1 C onstruction ot Proiect. AN .Ct 11,1111 iii hection 4, it I)e,cloper proceeds u 1111 the I'nuect. then De, eliper shall he ie:poii.ihle fur acquiring. constructing and mstalling the Prc,ject. including witliout hmitanon. all Eligible Improu·ments. and hall be responsible for conmliance in M] rexpects u ith the C it> Requil'elliclit. 2.2 I iti:,ticing the Eltuible imptmements. De\Cloper hhall be rehronsil,IC lor mitially |inal,Cilly the CostS illid CApell.ch ni connecti<,11 v ith the ocqui:itioll. con>ttllition 4111,1 allst.11|811(111 01 tile liligible |lill,rl,#ements. illelulling u Illitilll |Illillittitill all design cnits. enginecring cu.14 and 01|let 9,11 Cost>. itlciltred Iii L'Oilliectic,11 thcle\\ till 3. COM)1 1 10NS PRECEDENT -[O PALMEN'I OF RLIMBL.I<SEMEN ] A.MOUN1. 3.1 (P,tiditic,ns Precedent. Unless walied iii uriting h> the Fiecuttie Director. the Ii,1141,4 ing condition + precedent shall he sati,tied prior 10 1)culoper receiz ing an> re imbur.ein int fur Fligible C <,Ats pur#want to the lenn> and pi-ovisions 01 lib Agreement (il)lhe De,el<,per liall haze acquired all tlic Prupert>: Ch) The Subdiusion Imprmement Agreement hull has e been apprmed h> the C it> imil lecorded In the real estate recurdh: (C)Slill>tantiall> all of the Eligible hurrinemelil. thut are public imprin ement> thut the I)c, eloper is required to install hi ci,nziection with die lic,icct pursuant to Ilie· Subdi, ision 1111]1(nement Agrecmem and [he .ite plan shrill be ('c,nipleled: 81) An apartment conipler on the Propert> uith .il le.1.1 11() apartment unib 11:1. Ileen C (,illpli·ted. Ce) At least 8.000 square teet 4,1 retail space Nhall hare been Conipleted 4,11 the lioperl> I (1) Deu»per fliall har c withillitted tile Project ('t,lilpletion C 'ertificate to tile Autholity. and the Authont> sliall 1101 hai e ill%ruled the certitication in accordance Hith Section 5 I bet'et,1: 111'i,\ ided. 1,4,\cuu, thal m the LU'nt Iliat l,Illy a poillin 4,1 the Reimbursement Ami,unt 1> (11*plited, thiN Cl,Ililition precedent 114111 bc deemed NatiSIin| u ith re:peet Ic, the lilli|],plited ponion lit the Re: 111|1Urfellicili ·\Inolint I (g) Nt, hunts 01 I)efault 17> 1)c\eli,per shall hine occurred and be continuing under this Agreement. 4. DEVELOPER. 4.1 Acquisition. C onstruction and hivitllation of Proiect. 1 his Agreement 4uill not obligate the De, eli,per to proceed with the in®ct. If De, c|(,per prucced< with the Pi'i, ieet. 1)c\Cloper hliall bc lespi )11%]Ille Ibr Ille lin.incinK. design. acquibition, conht!*liction und 111*tallation o| the |'1-<,.lecl. subject to the provision. in this Agreement legarding retinhursement of Eligible Costs in accordance herewith. The design and construction of' the Pro.icel shall compl> in all 111.iterial respect< u ith all .11,1,licable code. and regulation4 4,1 entitie. Im, inc wrisdiction, including the· Cit> Requirements. Nots ithbuinding ally lirm isions lo the contran contained herein. tile [)e elopei .hal] be entitled [c, reinilill! >Clilelit tor Higible Costs incurred m cmmection with an I ligible 11111,rovement 0111> it' such Eligible Iniprovement coniplie uith Cit> Reqltireniclith. The De, ch,per u Il| lihe I'C.ix.Ilithie CI'li,114 lt, l|iligelill>' pll!-Alle (i ) prospectife Ccillitile!-Cl.11 lea.c tenant. 111cluding Vectra Bank: (ii ) rebponsne gencral contractor Construction bilk und (iii) all City of \\ heat Ridge des elopment reueu approuls. including site plan rerie'u and building pennits, lealling to the acqui.ition. c<,Iixtructic,n. inirrusement und leabe-up ot the P r <,i ec t If De#eli,per proceeds with the Pic,ject, Developer u ill pay or eau.e to he paid ill required fee> and CUsth. inclitiling those unposed h) the Cit>. in connection Nith the design, 0,11>tiuction. applicable warralit>· requirement>. and libe i)| tile Pl(lirel. The Pailies agree thal it the De, Chiper |las 1101 Ct,innieneed c 7,11Ntructioll of the Pritiect b> hinwary 1. 2(119. thal thi> hliall not constilitte ali ihent of Defau|t hereunder. but thal the Autlic,rit> shal l ha\ e tlic right to tenninate thts Agreement as Set tonh in Section 1 X. 7 4.2 Lligible Imptinements. The li.1 4,1 1-ligible litipri,ement. .et furth in lixhibit C att.tched hereto nia> he aniended al the u ritten request ot' De, cloper u illi the written consent ot the |· #ecittl\ e |)11ccti,r. unle» uch ct,11,4ent I. not required put.liant 14, the tenils 4,1 Exhibit l . 43 Access to Properti. Der eloper Hill permit representatives of Ilic City and the Authorit> acce.0 to the Propert> and the Proiect at reaxonable tunes dunng regular hu>inc» hour. and \# 1111 print notice as nece»ary for the' puilit).e ot carrving out 4,1 determining comi,lianci· with tliN Agreement the l rhan Reneual Plan. the Cit> Requirements or an> Cit code or (,rdinance. including uilliout It 1111 tation. nui,ection 4,1 an> fitirk being conductcd. 44 Alattlten:Ince of Prolect. De, ch,per .hall be ic.i,c,114,ble fur the :11:tititenance c,1 Iho.C pl,1-tion•; 01 thi Pruiect 11> set ful-th in the Sill,dnision Imprinement Agreement 4.5 Appeal 01 Propell\' lales. 1)ciclopti .1 1,ill proudc uitten notice to tlic \litholit>' 01,111> tcquewed redliction |1> 1)C\ Cloper 111,111> portion 1,1 the Plopert> 1 ical propell> 1:1\ A-eell salltiltion (,1 abatement ofan> portion 01 the Propert>''s real prupert>; ta\e+ 4 (,Ni,tilication of Sale of Propertv De\eloper Eill pro, ide uritten notice to the \lit|lont> <11 the hille ot- all <,1 uny portion of the Property h> Deu'loper during the term ot thi> \glectllent. 5. IliE Al i llc)1<!TY. 5.1 Pawnent m Reimbursement Ainount. I pl,11 Comp|!illice w·11|1 the conditic,ns preceilent het furth in Section 3.1 relating to the paymem of the Reimbursement Allic,unt, or tile 1-xecuti#e Director'$ sialver lit' any such Conditions preCL·dent, the Allthorin auree. that it shall . I. re!1111,urse De\ cloper fur Eligible Costs incurred in c<1111,ection with the acquisition, censtruction and inalation 01 I ligible hiipt-o,ement x m the Prowel ni an anic,unt equal to the Re 11111)ul'sement \111ount. but bolely 114,111 lili Pledged Re enue. received h> tlie Allt|lority. The \lithorit> efill liine thirty 00) days after the I)C,cli,Fc! 11,1. Nlibmitted the Project Complitic,n c eililicatc Ic, conlirm u hethei or not such Cet'tilicate complic with the ternr, and pi'll\14,114 01 this Agrecmem and ulicilter Ilic· conditions plecedent #Ct liurth in Sce'lion 3.1 hine been satiAlied i,r wai \Cd |1> the 1·Xecuti,C [)]Irclor. 11' tile Allth<,lity iloe. nul prinide „ritten appro,al 01 disapproull nithill lich thirt> (30) din perioll. the ('erlilicate .hall lie deemed apprmed h> tile \Litfuirity. 11 Ilie· Allthurity 11(ltifies the De\C|(,pet 111 n Illing u lihill such thirt> (3(3) day period thut thi· Authority disputes thal the condition precedent set furth in Xection .3.1 lia\e been fatisfied 01 -ved. or Ilial there 1% ilm xufficien| documentation relating to all or an> portion of tlic 1:ligible ( 41.1, Ilial hine been iticurred h> the De,eloper, and sets toi-th a detailed explanation u·hy the conilmon> precedent 110\ e not been sitti.licd. 6,81% ell or .lifticient|) docuillented. such portic,11 4,1 the Reimbursement Amount that is in dispute shall tic,t become due and pa>ahle Until De# eloper und Authorit> lia\e reohed tile dispute The Parlies agree tt, ct,operate in good faith to res<,11 e uny di>pute ic lating to the Mati.faction 01 the conditions precedent sel furth iii Section 3 1 \4 ithin thirt> 00) da> 4 after either Part> 's „tillen reque therefor. 5.2 Spec'iii] Fund: Proieet Account i he Alltlicilit> agree> 14, equil,hh the Special 1·Lind in accurdance with the prt,\ isions of the Act imil to c.tal,1141 tlic Pro.leet Account as a Neral'ille trl:%1 acculmt ifil|lin tile %]lecial [:und. The A litlic,ril> ligi'ec. 10 depOSil thi' Pledged 1-ar 8 ingement Re\Cnite, lilli, the lit).lect :\ccount ut the Special | l!11(| lipon recelpt 1,1 1|le Hanle. All I'ledged I a. Iticiement Itcs ellueN 017 delic,slt m the inucet ACCOU,11 4,1 the Nrecial I und are hereh> pledged to the lia>'ment 4,1- the Note fur as li,ng as the \*,le rema,11+ out>tanding. In the c, ent Ihilt 134,[icK are i.sited b> tlic Alit|ltint> to irepa> the Note in n lic,le t,r in part. all Pledged I in Increment Re; cilite> tin deposit in tile Project Account M the Special Fund .tic liereh> pledged 14, the 11.1>inent 01 the Bonds li,1 a. It,ng :14 the Ht,ill|% relli:1111 (,ut.litlic|Illg, In Ille C, ent ili.Ii the Holilk .Ind the Note .tre (,Utft,111(ling at the %allie linic. the priont> 1,1 the |ic!1011|le Bond> and the Nute on hitch Pledged Tar |licrellient Re, Cill,Ch %11:ill hc detennined at the time (,1 1%>llittice Bl the 11()11(10 -th the prnit „ ritten Clinsent 4,1 De; Cloper 5.3 No 1-lection Required. The Partic. acklic,\\ ledge that accurding to the decision i,f Ilic Colt,rado ( 'ourt „1 Appeals in ()ls, in #.('ity i,1'(it,Iden, 53 P..lil 747 (2,)<)2), an urb:111 lenCH :Il autlic,nt> 1# not a h,cal gtnenitilent illit| 1|lerefule IS not 4,11,»-1 to tile prinis!„11> 01 Artic|C .\. Rect 14,11 20 01 the C '0101-.tdo ('(711Ntillition. According|>. the ·\L!111(,1-il> Illa>· elliet iliti, 1111 Agreement with [)culoper. Creellte ailil (lelier tile Note and agree Ii, re}1111 the PICilged Re, CrlliC. to [)i'\ Chylel 10 1-Cltllblir.C [)C\L|(Ter hu i |Igilile (ost, ill accordancc \\1111 the ploe tric,114 M Ilus Auteellicill 1111(,ut Ck'Cturill :lullit,1'1/atioll. atill huch obligill](,114 are lit,t hlibleCI to alitilial :Ippnjp!1.Ition 54 Nt) hni,mniient. The Alltlwity s, ill 11(,1 intel into an> agreement (,r transactic,11 Illat illip.111-5 tile rights of the Parties. including uitholit |liliitation. the right ti, rei'ei, e and appl> the Pledged Ref enue m accordance with the lenliN .ind pros 1.14,n. 4,1 this Agreement f, PAYMENT OIl Rlil\!Bl;RS[-MI.\:1 (ir 1.1.1(.,11$11 C Obls:\Ol E 11<c)\1 Al 1 1 IORITY. 1 ipon conipliance With the conditions precedent Ket 12,1111 in Section 3,1. De,Clopel iliall he remil,ili-+ed 1,> the Autlic,rit> li,r Ellgillic ('t,st. 111<lirt-ed in Cl,linection U 11|1 Ilie Prniect. but Nelel> Irc,m Pledged Res emies. in all allic,unt not ti, e,Ce·ed the Reimbur.ement Amolt!11. I he c,bligation to pa> the Rcilliburhement Allic,unt :hall bc e, 1(|Cnied h> tile \<,ic to be C,Cculcil 11> the Alithorit> und dehvered to De\Cli,per, (a)1 lion the c..cclition .lili| dellic!*y fil 1111% Agi+Ccillent. tile Authomt> %11,111 execlite· illk| di·Iner Ilic Noti· Il, De\Clopet in bulht:Iliti.Illy Ilie li,rin .el I< *rth in lixhibit 1·2 1111:!Ched hereto. ille 111:Irillium :1111(,unt of l|le Nt,te .liall I,C I (,lir Million Light Hundid 1-lit,us:mil [)„llar: (04.Nlic).c)(H)) l.'pon et,ilipliatice with the ec,ililillim. precedent set forth in Xectinn 3,1. Ilic Rei,iiliu,*0ement Aini,unt Aliall liect,ine due :ind pa>al,le in accordance nith the ter|11.. pr<n |014,114 .Ind limitations 4,1 1111$ Agreemetit I he Nt,te +11Ill mature on Nin ember I. (19 The \„te shall he a special and hmited <,bligation M tile Auth„Fit> pa>·al,le solel> from tlic Pledged Re, elilleb. Thi P|Cliged Rei enue· are liereh> pledged to the pa>'ment of the \me. The obligation to reinibitre De; cloper for I·ligible C tists. which phligation i. e,idenced h> the Ni,le. i. and shall bc a special and hmited obligatic,11 01 the Alitholit> SCCUIL'll b# an irre, (,cable pledge of. und pa>able Foleh troill. the I'ledged I<ci emic. 1 )c, eloper 1110> not look to an> general 01 other tund of [lic Authonty tor the 1,6,>melit m the Note cicept the Pledged Reseliue.. 1 he Nute liall not Constitute· an indehtedne». linancial obligation <,1 habilit> 01 the C 'it> or the btate or an> count>. tnlillicipalit> or public hod> thereof. and neillier the ('it>. tile 41,Ite nor an> political hlibili\ !Sion t|lei'el,1 >hall he Imble tlie·reun. Ill,1 111 811> ee Lilt >11:ill the Nole l) be pa>able out of an> ftindh or propellic* 01|ler |han tile Pledged Re, enue#.1 urther. the \„tc Nhall ill,1 Con>titille a cle|,1. lilliebtednes.. linancial <,1,ligatitin or habilit> 01 th, C'it> u 11|1111 the Illi,ining of.lin con<litltlional. >t,ttotory lir Chol-ter delit |Illittation ot plinivi,11. (c) St, Intle a. the Nute i 4,111.1.ilicling. no latel than \Inember 1 01 each yeal (lieginning on the fit-ht Nmeniher I after the condilion•; pi-ece'lle!11 het furth m Hection 3.1 ha, c been met), the Authont> slial| remit 11, |)cz e|(,per .11| Pledged Re, Cille. 4,11 depobit with tile Authurity in the Protect Account of the Kpecm] Lit,id An> such Pledged Res enues remitted h> the Authorit> ti, Des cloper shall he applied on C.IL'h Noreinher I to the pa>illent 2,1 t|le Re,inhursement .\Inuunt repre.ented h> the Nt,te De\eloper shall 11„Ic on the 1 able 01 4 )ittstanding Reimbunement Amount attached h, the Nt,te tile :1111(,unt pald oil tlie Noic „11 each Nmemher 1 The Autlionly Nhal| remit the Pledged Reveliue> 10 De,ilt,per h> ire tran>ful unk» „ther\, 1>C d i recl ed 111 U 1 i t i ng 11> Devel oper, cd) 1 |le Ailthot-ity sluill Intic the option ti, 1,iepay ilie Noic iii zilit,Ic or iii p:irt on an> date upon p.1> Illent (,t the anh,lilli tileti·1,1 (,utstanding. \1 11|li,lit pl-Cra>ment premium Unless wai, cd iii zinting h> De, e|*,per. tlic Authorit> 011,111 proudc I)ci eloper u Ith at least ten ( 10) bu>inc» days' 11„lice prior ti, ati>' prep.1>11ient ditte Ce) I he Nute sliall be inadc pit>able to [)e; elopci. 1)cs clopei ma> m,1 *ell oi 11 .infer the Note in part. and Ilia> lic,t hell t,1 tranhfer the Ni,le in u lic,le ptior ti, Cumpletion 01 C 9,11>truclic)11 41 1|IC |'1'c,ICCI ,< 1111•n:t [lic priol' uritten con#ent 4,1 Ilie Alithoril>. A tier C <Impletion 01 the Projecl. the Note 1113> be 4(,lil 1,1' 1 1'.,11>101-red m whole ti 1 .Iny elitil> 11 1.11 has been .ING'gned all the De,eltilier'3 1-ights under this Agicement 11, el,Ilipliance „ith the tenns and Ill'li, ision. 01 hection 21 hercul. or u ith the prit,r written com.ent 4,1 the Alilliont> (1) 1·4,1' M, lonu as the Null' i. out.1:inding. the Authorit> shall not twile an> Bonds thal ure pa> able in u lit,le or in part from the I'ledged Re, enue u illit,ut the prior u ritten conNent 4,1 De, e|(,1,er. Ill tile cumt thal tile ,Allt|11,rit> (|etenill Ile. tt, isslle |4(,11(1% ti, prepay the Nt,te in part. and not in ulit,le. the Autherity shall mil nisue >uch Bond# wi|11(,lit till· pric,1 ,#inten cot™ent i 11- Developer. (g) Ncitifith.landing an> other pri)\ ision contamed herem. any nubtanding balance Jue on the Note w. 1,1 the maturity date 01 Noveniber I. 2040 101 u litch the Alithority doe> not 11:n e sut'ticient a,allithle Pledged Re·u·nueh 141 pay u Ill he tiill> discharged and Itistied 41> of thal clate 11(,t\< 1111.littilling Such nonpayment. Any such nonpa>-ment shall not constilitte an hent of Default hereunder or under the Notc and the tuent>-Ii , c (25)->ear peric,d 01 limitation .i·t furth in Section 31-25-14)7(OHa) 4,1 the Act 41£111 lit,t he extended pursu:111110 Section 31-25- 107(41(1) c,t the Act to make any payment lin the Nute aller NI,\ember 1.2040. 11 the Ni,te has Ileen dINCharged purbllimt to 11110 rat-:tgraph, then the Alithority's til,ligation k, relililiurhe Devel<,per for Eligible Costs diall bc deemed Killiblicd hereunder and De\clopei- shaill hai e no further nglil> to reimbur>ement under thts Agicement 7, BOOKS AND ACCOUNTS. INSPE.( 1 ION 01 REC'ORDS [lic Authorit> uill keep pri,per and current itemi,ed rect,rds. book. and accc,unts in which complete and accurate entrie. u ill he made el the ieee·ipt and use <,fall :,Innunt, 01 re·4·nue rece·i, ed from :iny and all M,urce* and such ollie! cit|Cll|:ttlon. tcquit-cd h> this Agreement and an> applicable lau 4,r regulaticin. lll De#el(,per Nliall keep accurate ho<,60 .ind ICCUI-d> 1,1- al| Cuht. Ilicill'i-ed in connecticin u ttll the· de>Ign. 111.111.lgenlent. :lequt 4111(,11. C(,11.trlictic,11 and u .irrant> (ilh .11'1'lic,il,IC) l,t the 1 ligible |1111,ri„cments. imil thi· receirt <,1 pa>111£111 4,1 reimbul*Nellielli t,f Fill:11,10 (i,KIN. During trgul:11 bU.Ille·As holli'N .inll lipi,1 1 te.i,omible ad, ance notice. tile .'llit|11,1-it> 01 11 . l|C<lgilee Ib herch> .Ilit|li,1-1/ed 1(, le \ IC·u. at the Alltli<,1-11> *> cuit ailli CUleliNC. De,clopet 2 1,0, iks :ind rect,i-i14 relating ti, the | h,giblc |tiprocellient, alic| the receipt 01' 11.1>nient 1,1 iciti,Ilin'.einent of [-ligible C WAS. \11 h™,ks. record. and report> (e,cert thi,Ne alli„ied 4,1- required 1,> applicable lin 1„ he kept confidential) m the pt,%.e.sion 01 the Authorit> relating to tlic collection and dishur>.cment 01 the Pledged Re,elilleh :ind thi' pa>ment 01 the I ligible ('O%14 hlial| al all le.IN,nal,le time. |le 1,1,cll to illipection Ii> bl]Ch .Ice(,11111.int, 01 01|ici' Ilgent< 11% the 1-Chpl'Cllic |'.11-110 111,1> tr(vil lillic to 111/C de>•1211,AC 8 INSL:RAN( 1 On Ill prioT hi lili' c (,111111<'IMCC111211| 4 4 ( 4,11#t!11CtiOII I ),\ Cll#FC[ U I|| pro, hle tile ( it> .int| the .\lithont> uith L'ent|iC,itch c '1 111>liI.Iticc ·4 Iv. 114; 11111 1)C\e|t ,;1.9 14 carr>mg. or cailsing prime contractor. to carr>. the 101141,4 ing inhurance: Gencral Liabilit>. Hith a general al:uretrate of I wi, Million Dillars (42,01)0.1)00): fire di,inage of Oile Hundred 1-housand Dullars (il c){).c)()0): niedical e,i,ense· t,1- Fi, c -1lic,urand I)<,Ilars (S5.00(}): pl'('lilicts Clmpleted t,lierations aggregate 01- 1 ru, Million Dollar. C %2.l)(H).000£ pel St,11:11 :Ind ilil, ellising injur> 01 ()ne Million Dollar>(% 1.(,c)().000) \\ith each occurrence up to Une Nlillion Dollarf (Al.()11{).C)(1(1). 1,1111 iliductible of I \,cni>-Ii\c Hundred Doll,114 1%2.51)(4 per claim. I fcc» liabilit> Nliall Ile cilicicd 111 2111 ailloilill cqu,il to i en flillion Ihill,114 61().4)(H).C)(1111 pet occorrence [en \|ilhon Dollur. 61().()()().000) aggregate. l) INDLOXIN'11( A liu\1-\cept .14 llc!-clluitter pro\Iticd. 110111 C „111!licilecillent m Con#truction of Ille Project through Completion of C 'unstruction 4,1 the Pro.lect. and 14,1 an> action arising during thal time rericili, De, Clorct- agreeS k, inile!1111|f>. l|efend and lic,Id hannic» tile C '11> :mi| the Alithorit> 11% c,flicers. agent Imil emplinee>. from and againft all lial,ilit>. clittills. deinatick and C.lielisch. itic|litlilly lines mipi,>ed b> an> applic:,ble .tate <,r 12ile! iiI regulillor> agench Court cost> and attorne> Ii'Ch. 011 account 1,1 lin> in.lur>. In». 4,1 damage to tile crtent ari>ing out 4,1 im> 01 the work to he perfulilled h> Deve|(,pii'. any .11'Contraclot (,1 [)c \ elopet. or un> ofticer. enip| 4 3>'ec. agelit. *ucce»or or a»lyn 1:1 1)e, clopet under lili>, Agrecment. but <,ul> 1„ the e.\tent huell illilli·>. Ilish. 4,1 dailiage is coused b> the negligent act 4,1 01111.sion. crror. professional error. mi,take. accident. or other fault 4,1 De\Clopel. an> subcontractor ot [)c; cloper. or an) officer. emplo>ee. agent. succe»or 01 :14*16:11 01 De cloper. but excluding an> 111.Ill'-les. Ins.es or damages uhich are due lt, the gniss negligence. breach 4,1 contract 4,1 uillful IlliCi,Ildllet 4,1 the ( It> 4,1 the ..\Lillifilit>. a. the C:the ma> be. Nt,tifilhxt,illi|lilli the foregoing (,1- 8111 p[-0\ Gion to the contion contailled herein. iii Ilic e\ elit that al I (,r :1 purtion 01 the Pi'(Ilect i. tilillilced K I th .1 11 l: D- illfili'el| SCL 11,111 221) „r 22 1 (d )(4 ) It,an. and 4, |ung ah an> huch Il,an remallib l,ll|:t:tilding. LIllA oblig,111„111,1 the De,eli,per to prmide indemnificatiun undel this Agreement shall be limited t" (i) ainounts numciated b> State las#. ifan>. (ii) cou·rage afforded under an> habilit> Hisuratice carried h> the De,elopet, and (iii) ai ailable -surplu# cash" of the Dcs eloper a. defined in the Regulator> Agreement executed iii connection u i,h an> uch loan.Unt,1 fund. from a permitted *ource lor pa>ment 01 indemnilicatic,11 u,+14 tile awilable fur pa>ment. the De, el<,per shall 114,1 (a) pay funds w an> 11 indemmtee under thib Agreement. or (b) pay tile (leductihle on an ilidemnitication poliey fur an> indeinnitce under this Agreement 10 REPRLSENTAI R)NS AND WARRANTIES. 1(). 1 Representations and \Varrantie. b; the Authoritv. The Authority represent: kind uarr,11114 as li,Ilows: C .1 )I he Allihorin: is a 1,(,ily ecillic,rate and pi,|Itic (,f the State of Colt,rado. dill> 4,1-gant/cil under the Act. and has the powei lo entel intl, and 11:10 taken all actic,ns tu ditte lequited to aut|1(,ri/e !111< Agreement 311*114, carr> tbut 114 i,hligatic,th I he Alithoril> knt,„4 4,1 110 1111&41114,11. proce,·limg, Ilillialtne. relerendum. lin Chlig.ltion (,1 threat of ally (,1 tile s.tme contesting the pl,##Cl-0 4,1 1|le Ailt|1„111> (,1- its ullicial. „1111 re<pect h, [Ilix Agreeme,11 111:11 ha: 11(,1 been dihcl„.ell in „liting to I ):\ Cloper (C)The eu'cution and delncry el this Agreement and the (|l,Cuments required anc| the coii#iimmation 01' the tran>actions et,111(11111|aled hy this Agrcement u 111 m,t (1) contlicl with or contravene· any lau. order, rule 4,1 regulation applicable to the Authority or to its governine documents. (ii) result in the breach of an> of the terms or provisions 01 constitute a default under an> agrecinent or other initrument to which tile Authont> is a part> or h> which it ma> lie h<,ltill| or :1112cted. or (iii) pernul any part> to termillate :111> .lich agieement or instruments or to accelerate tlic 111.iturit> 01 any indebledne» or other obligation 01 the Authorit> (d) The Pledged Reiciiue. ate 11(,1 hilbject to any other or prior pledge o! encumbrance. and tile Authority will not pledge or eneumber the Pledged Ref enlies so long its tile Note 1% (Illtstanding n illic,ul l|ic plic,1- u lillen c(,Ilhent l,1 De, eloper. (e)I his Agreement cniwitille. a $ :illd and hinding 4,111!gation of tile Aullic,1-ity. elll<,lecalile accoilling to it. terms. except lo the etcm hmited by bankrupley, illht,helic> and t,ther 1.1\0 + t,f gelleral apli|Iciltioll .illecting Crcilitt,rs' right. and by equilable 1,111cipli·*. whether 0,11lered at law er in cquily. 1 ().2 Rei,re>.entations and Warranties hi Dc# elopet. Des eloper represents and \Jarrant. as fullows (a)De; eloper is a Colorado linitled liability compan> and in good standing and authorwed 10 do business in the State nt Coloraclo and has the pow*er and the authorit> to enter into and perform in a timel> manner its obligations under this Agreement. (b) 1 he e,ecution and deli,ery 01 this Agreement has been duly and wilid!>' authorized b> all necessar> action on it* part to make this Agreement ulid and binding upon De# eloper. 12 (C)The c.,ccution und deli\er>' 411- thi, Agicement Hill not (i) conflict Nith or Ccultrinene any law. order. rule or regulatien applicable to De, cloper c,r ti, De,cloper'+ ginerning dt.,Cumenth. (11) 1-C>,1111 111 the breach 01 .iny (,1- Ihe le!111+ 01- prt.n is],1114 01- Colistillite a defaull uncler any agreement or i,ther instl-illilent 10 \i hich De,Cll,per Is a part> or hy „Ilic'11 it may he hc,und or allected. or (iii) permit any partv 1,) tenninate ally Nitch agreement or iii>Illinienth or to .tcceleral, the maturit> 01 .111>' ilicklitedne» or (,ther <41|igation (,I De, eli,per. (il) De,eloper kili,\0% 1,1 liu Ittlgation. 1,1-oceeding. initiati,e. relerendum. or 111\ estiMation or threal or :in> i,1 the *:tine ct,jitesting the pou en 01 DC, Cloper (11' ilin' 4,1 11. pl-Ilicipills or (,flicial>, 1, ith le>.rect to thIN .Agreement tlial has 8,1 heell lit+C|i·,ell ill \< riling to the Authority. (CJ De, cloper |lit. prepared (,1 caused to be prep.t!-el| 11 |ill.111Ctily alld de\ elopment plan toi the Proicit und Developer reasonably exilect. thal tile Pledged Revenue. tc, he generated trom the PI'll.lect s Ill be sullicient k, pa> the Rcm,bursement Amount repre>.ented b> the Notc pril,r lu tile Illatunly date 411 the Note. (f) 1 111: Agreement con:titittes a valid and hmdmg pbligation ot- De\eli,pel. enforee:ible according to its tenns. except to tlic c·,tent hnuted b> liankrupte>. instil Clic> and other I.lus of gelleral applicaticiti allecting Cleclitors' rights and by equitill,le pt-iticiplcs. u hetlier ct,1,dered ut I:iu i,i iii equity. 11. TERM. 1-he terni oftliN Agreement is tile relit,d Commelicing on the Ft fectlic Date Litill lenniti:itilig 4,11 Ilie date that the Note and an> Bonils issited by tile Authorit> are no longer nuivt.ill,ling: pro, ided. that tile Ii,Ill)u'ing provihion. Sh.ill continue he>'und the lerm (11- this Agicellient: C.·\) all> Ity|114 kind rellieilicf t|llit a Party has fur all [Nent 01- Det.illit herelitilier: (B) any right Iliat a Party has ti, infrect bol,k. and rect,rch as Set 1211111 herein fur :1 perioll (,1 foul- (4) rear 12,110„ing tennination 4,1 this Agreement: and (C) the mdemnification prinisionh Net torth 111 Section 0. 12. CONFLICTS 01 1N1-EREST, None of the follouing will have kin> PLIM,nal micrest. direct or inclirect. in this Agreement: a nicinher (,1 the governing bud> 4,1- 1|le Allilicint> 01 the City. an employee ofthe Aillhority or of the City u ho erercises responsibility concernmg the 1 11.11:iii Reneual Plan. or an indiddual or linn retained h> the City or tile Alitlii,rity who has pel'14,1-med Con>ulting ser\ice> 1,1 the Aullit,ii,v 4,1- the ( ity in connection with the l.11-1,4,11 Renen il 1'].in 4,1 this Agreement. None 01 the· al,ine persons or entities u ill participate in :in> decivon relating to the Agreement Ilial affects his or her personal interests or the intere>ts of an> c<,1-IN,ration. parmership ur association in u hich he ur she is directly or indi!-ectly interested. 13. AN1-1-DISCRIMINATION. De,ell,per. toi itself and its slicces.*,1 + and :Mign.. agrees tbal in tile constructic,11 01' the Eligible 1111prerements and in the ube and occup:Ine> 01 1|le PR,perty and Ilie Eligilile Inipn)i ements. Devel€,ret \\ ill not (liscriminate agaill:t ally ellipli,>re or applicant for emplc,>ment hecau 011-ace. color, creed. religion. ex. sexual orientation. (11>0111|ilv. Iliantal >tallts. :Ilicestrv. (,1 Ilational i iI'lum. I 3 14. NOTICLh An> notice required 01 permitted h> this Agrcement uill he 111 Ul'Iting alld ifill he deemed w ha, c heell .ufficientl> gne'll Ii,r all purpt,ses il- dell, ered m lier.<In. h> prepilid inernight exple» 111:111 01 Inermy|11 courier i-\-ice. by certified mail 01- 1 Lig,Atered mitil. pi,vage pl-epall| return I CLCIpt leque.ted. Illicit-e»ed to the P.irt> 10 H |lom hlic|111,)11£'C IN lo he gl\Cil (illid Nuch Part>''s .Illdition:11 perv,114 10 Cop> ) ilt tile addless(ch) .et li,rth an tile :ignature page bel(,u 01 111 >lic|1 (,thel (ir :itillitic,nal addresse. a. ma> be furnihhed m writilly to Ille other Parties. 1 he Parties Ina> al>o agree oil .1 different Ilicall+ 01 1,Ic,fiding H ritten notice herelinder. ilicluding w itliout hmnation. nonce \ 1.t electroriic mail. Notice shall be deemed rei*ei, eil (i) it deliuird m person. lipon actual receipt (01- refuhal to Liccept dehier>). (Ii) 11 b> 1,repaid i,ietiiight c,1,ic.4 mail or orennight culliler henice, on thc lird blthtle» dJ> 101|Ailly heillIng oft|lc notiCC. und (iii) it b> certilicd illili| or reglhtclcd Illail. pi)%1:lge prepitil| Icilt,-11 receipt requested, (,11 the Cill'lle! t,1 the date 4,1 tile receipt 4,1 the 1|111(i bilvne» do> follouttle .clic|!Ily ottlic 11*,rice 15. DELAYS: 1·(11<(1 MAJEL RE. Sullic.1 lo the fullouing prinibion.. flme 14 (,f 1|le c..ence An> delan in or Ihilute of perfurmance h> an> Part> m it. obligations under 1111+ Agreement shall be e,cil.ed 11 such dela>-0 4,r t.jilure are a result 01 acts <,1 God. tire. Ilot,d.. c,ci»ive rain. callhquake. grikes. labor dispute,4. reglliation. initiatise, rejurendum. legislation. h tigation. or order 4,1 £'11 11 01 lililitary authontief. 4,1 4,ther causes. fitmlar or dissi111ilar. u hich are bewnd the contrul 1,1 vich 1,4111> . 1 6.LVEN 1 S 01 1)Iii·Al'L I . Ille Ic,Iltnung e,etit% shall CnliN|lilite ail l \Clit *,1 Del.lilli williet this Agi-cement: (41)An> reprexentation or N an-ant> initile by ail> Part> in thi Agreement prou·> to hae C been untrlic or ilicomplete in an> nuiterial respect u ben made and zilitch untruth or incomplelion u oilld ha, e a matet'tai ad, er.e effect upon the other Parl> Ch) No long as the Nete re!1111111. ,utslanding, the Alithority luil. ti, remit the Pledged Res emle> im depe:it s ith the Alltht,rit> to De, el<,pci- on 4,1- priot- 10 Nm ember I 01 Ciach Velll (c) 1.,cept a> i,ther„ Ac prmidcd iii thi> Agrecment. an> Parly fai|4 111 the pei Ii,nnance of any (,ther cm enant iii 1111# Agreement and gtch delault continue. fur thirt) ( 30) ila>* iliter uritten notice pecit>ing such default and requiring the same to be remedied i. gi, en b> a tic,n-delaulting I'lirt> to thedefaulting Part> Ith,uch default is not of a t>'pc u hich can he cured u ithin such thirty (3()) cia> perlod and the defaulting Party gizes u ritten notice w the nan-detilillting Party c,r Partie , tillin such thirty (3(1)-ilay perlud that it t. acti,ely und diligently purbiling such cure. the l|el:Illl| lily 14„1> shall have a reasonable period <,f lime gi,en the nature of the default full,nung the end 01.uch 11111-t> (3(4-(18> perit,d [t, cure such l|elkill||. r!'41% illcil 111:11 ilich de|killitilly Part> 14 at all timeN U ithin hile'll additic,nal time peril)(1 activel> and diligenth purcuing Such cure in good taith. 17, REMEDIES Upon the occurrence and Cont Illuation of Lin hent 01 Default. the non- defaulling Pall> 4 icinedies fill be 1111iited to [lic right to enforce the dethulting P.111> 1 I 4 0|,ligatic,n> h> Lili action ti,1 111.Ilinction. >pecific peril,rmunce. 01 (,ther appl'(,pl-1.11< equitable remed> l,1 fur Ill.111(lamu+. 01- hy an ilition tu colleet and enfurce ra> ment (,1 sums ouilly hereunder. and no otlier reincil> . lind no i>,trly U'i ll be entitled to or Chilin d.tillage> for 1111 h ent of Default b> the delaullitig Parly. ilicluding u illiout |tillitation. 1(,Nt profils. economIC ilitinagch, ir actual. direct. illcidental. Coll#equential. pul)1110'e (,1 evelliplar> dilinage'b. in Ilic· C\ent (11 Jin |Itigation or titlier proccelling to enforce any of tile terms. cou'nant# or wnditions of thiN Agreement. the pre, ailing part>' in bllell litigation pr other pr<,Crellmg All:1111-ece·i\C. uS part l'f ith .Kidgmcill 1,1' 11\\ ard. its reasonable attorne>V fees mid cost>.. I X. 1 1:14.M INA 1 ION. I his Agreement ma> be [ei minated hy the |)e, elt,pel ilt any time prwr 1(, the ('4,111111(licellicill (,f C litistruction of Ilic |i Illect, Ill the esent 111:11 De#el, }per hit. 1101 C,unmenced Construclion of the Prujecl (111 or priI,r 10 .1:immr> 1. 21)14. then the Autlioril> 41:111 Ime the oplion to terininale this Agreement. In the e, elll thal the Cit> Coillicil 01 the ('it> has nut appimed the i rhan I<cneual Plan on or prinr ti, December 31. 2015. Illcil Ille De,cloper and the Authority Alall each Ilin e tile oplit,11 to tcnilinate 11 11>· A greemelit. In 01-del' ti, telillin:lie thih Agreement. a Party shall prtn ille Written 11(,tice (, f such ternlinallon to tlic otlier Part>. Slicll te!-1111]1ition shall be cilect!\ c thirt> (30) dll>> after tile dati 1)14llch 11('tice. \\ ithout an)· further action by the Pailies. unless prior k, vach lime. the Parties arc aMe to Ilegoll,lic ill ytioll |ililh lo reach mi ligreellient t(, a\(,id huch lel-illillatitin, l pen such ternimation. this Aurcement 011:111 lic null ritid s (,iil and 01- tio ellect. and no action. C|:11111 01 demand 111,1> be bit.cil t,n an> term (,1- lil-m'Non 01 this Agreement. c\cert 2,4 ('thL'I i I.C C.111CS.|> sel forth herein. In adilitit,n the Panics agree to execlite a inutual relca.c tu- allier inArllillent> reast,liably required Il, Clifelliate And give lititice 4,1'Slich lenilillittion. Ic) PAYMENT c )1 FEES AND EXPENSES Each Part> agrce> lo mi> fur its oun fees. Ce,M. and expell<es incuned by such Parly in et,mlection with the execulion and deli, ery ol tht> AgreellicIll und 1*chited .tgrcenlcill. 41!Ill (|l,Cl!!lient>. 1 NONLIABILI-IN- 01· 01-1·ICIALS, AGENTS. MEMBERS. AND EMPLOYEES. |Ircept for u i||lit| 4,1 u':Inton actions. 11(, trustee. lic,ard niember. Conimishiliner, ufficial. eniplo>re. con>ullani. manager. 111einber. shareholder. attorne>' or agent of any Pany. nor an> lender to any Pany 01- 1,1 the Project. H ill Ile pe!-sunally liable under the Agreement ut m the event ofany dclhult or 1(,r any allic,unt Ihat ma>· become due k, an>· Party. 3l.ASSIGNMENT. Ercept as hereinafter provided. this Agreement shall 1101 be assittned in u'llole or ill pal-1 11> cither Party Witholit tile pnor .ritten con.ent of the other Paily: pro\idcd. 114,„ ever. the fullindng ax>ignments and 11-:insfers will nut require any sue|1 Collhent: (:l) subject to \\ 1-illen notice to the Authority from De\Cloper el}litaining the liallie und illil|ress (,f the lender or other part>. Dc,cloper ina>' pkilge. collaterally assign or otheruise encumber aN or uny part of its 1-ights undei thi>. Agicellient, incluiling uitholit |ililitation ith 1-ight to lecei fe :Iny payllient 01- reilli|,u!*ement. 10 :111> lender (,1- other party thilt pim liles acquihition. Construction, sorking capital. teli:int illiprtnement l,r (,ther financing ti, 1)eveli}per in connection with de,eltil,iiiclit of' the in,perty and or construct,(,11 1,1 the L ligilile Imprcis'ement€. und (b) t)11 1,1- alter ('(,lip|Ction 4,1 Construction of the Pr«·Ct :111(1 >liblect to u'riltell 11(,lice ti, tile Authont> trum De\Clopel. De\Cloper Ilia> 41%41gn all tit ith rightf under tht. Agreement to an> entit> that purcha.cs al| (,1 the Propen>. plmided thal un> buch ellill> h.14 thi· tinancial capabilit> and c,pelietice to niatiage tile Proicil und the De,cloper ha. prouded the ,\Lithority nit|i <,111:1,1,·tor> c, idelice (4 %,Ich tinalicial c.111.1111| 11> 811<1 c \I,erience. Nc,lii 1111>121111111 Ig all)'thing to Ilic contritr>' 111 iliA Section 21. the .Alith(,rit> recogill/e. 1|lai Develliller min 14,1'111. logether s, 1111 11. 111\Cslol'N. NCI);11-llte. +Pecia| purplihe entities 11, cle, Chip. ini 11 alld t,! Brentle :1|1 4,1 a portlun (,1 the in,Pert> or 01 tile I·.ligible Impri,\ ellients 11, be Ct,1stiucted thereun and thilt (,ne „r 11-lt,re asslullilicill. 4,1' all 4,10 an> part 4,1 Dculoper's right under this Agreement min be lequired in connection uith huch acti,itie. and such transfur(>) Kill not require an> con.clit h> the PartiC< 1,COOPERA ] ION Rl:GARDING l)1.1·L.NS[·.. In tile c,ent 01 an> litigation or uther legal chillienge ins oh ing thi: Agreement. Ilie , aliclity „1 the l'rhan Rencu iii Plan. c,r any i,ther inatertul pail or pro\'»ion 01 thts Agiceinclit Ot Ilic ability of an> Part> to enter inti, lili>, .·\glecillent. t|le Parties Ul|| C{,licrate ;lilli 114011\ dell'Ill| Ill!0111%1 huch ,iction or Challcill:c. to the Client pct-initted b> 1,!u 23. SEC I ION CAP I IONS. The captit,nA 4,1 the Sections are sel furth iml> 101 tile comenience and refurence of the Panies and al C not intended in an> u a> to detilic. limit. or describe the >ciTe or ilite!11 01*this Agicentent. 24 AD[)1 1 IONAL D<)l l.' MEN-1 S OR AC I ION. I hi· Parlic# agree Ii, ciecitte· any additional ll„Clilliciltf or 1.ike an> addltional action. incll!(ling ulthout limitillion e.1,)111,el documents requested 01- reqillied In ||!Irc| pallies. Inclulling U illiout hilillatic,11. letiliel*4. lenalits 01 potential purchit,er>.. tliat Is nece»al> to carry out this Agreement or is reasonahl> requeled h> an> Purt> ti, ct,illirm 1,1 elarilj tile intent 01' the prin isions 4,1 11110 Agrcement and to e tlecluate the agi*eemenb und Ilie intent. Notuith>t.iliding the foregoing. houe, er. no l'.111> shall he obligated ti) cieculc 011> additional docitinerit or take ain additional action unless hueh document or action A rei,Nonably acceptable to >Lach Party. (11) 11 all or an> porlion of this Agreement. 01 other agicements apprined in connection u ith thi Agreement are as.elled or detennined to he inwilid. illegal t,r are (,thern ie precluded. the Parties, ulthin the scope (,1 their pou ers and dilties. will cooperate m the .ioint defun>e· 4,1 such docitinents and. ifiuell defenbc IS Ull.LICCCS!,lul. the Pitilies will use reahonable. diligent gooll faith ell't,11% to amend. refi,rm or replace such precluded items k, a#sure. 1(, the c\tent legall> penutivible. that each Part, sub.taiitiall> recei\e. the henelit. tliat it iwil|d hai e recel, ed under this Agicement (C)I lie 1·recuti\e [)Iicclor sh.ill liase the .ill|lil,1-li\ 111 iICI 011 behalf (,1 the \Nthorit> under this Agicetiictit 25. AMENDMEN1 1111> Agreement ma> be ainended on|> 1,0 un mstrument iii u riting signed and delifered In the Parties. WAIVER OF BREACIL A uai\er h> ati> Part> to thi Agreement ni the breach of ali> term or pros ision of t|lif Agreelnent must he in #4 nt'ng and u ill not operille or he Con,11'lled u. a Ualier O| an> 0,11)+Cquent hreach 113 an>· Pull> . l6 27.GOVERNING L.A\\ l ili 1.1,<-N c,t the St.Itc 01 C c,|NI,1,1,1 64,\ Cl-11 this .Agreement. 28.BIN!)ING Iii 1·11'1 Illih Agrectnent £,ill inure to the hencill 01.ind lie bililling lipoli the Partic> :md their respectic legal reprehentatives. silcce·>sil->. hell-14, and assigib, prtnided thut nothilly in this par:!graph pernlith tile assignment (71 this Agreement e,cert as Ket lorth ill Section 21 24. EXEC-l i Ic)N IN Ct)LIN IliNPAR I X. I his Agreement nia> he executed in +9\ eral counterparts. eitch of uhic|1 \\ ill he deenied .in orit,!111.11 and .,11 4,1 zihich u ill ctilitillite but one and the billile inwl'Litnent. 3(1.1-1\11 I-ED 1 111141)-PAR] Y BL\1:1·1(7:\RIES. i:,cept 11> licicinafter pro\ided. Ilit Agreement is not intended and *ill not be deemed u, confur an> right> 4,11 Lin> per,4,11 or Cnlit> nol named :14 a Part>' ti, 11114 \greement: prin ided, lic,„ czer. thal the City shall he deemed to lie a third-part> beneficiary under this Agreement to the C\IC]11 111:11 1)evelt,pel i Ir Authority have agired te Undertake Lertain actic)!D for tile benefit (,1 tile ('lly, 6 1 3.0 PRESLJMPI ION. llie Pattie> and their attorneys have Imd a full opportullity to revie„ und 1,:1!licipate in the dratting 01 the linal fonn of this AgreemenE Accordingly, this Agreement u ill be ct,nstrued williout regard to :111> pre>itiziption (,r „ther rule of 0,11%1ructic,11 aguilist the P:11'tV cituxing the Agreement to be drafted, 32. SEVERABIL.ITY. It Lin> prinision 44' thi. Agreement a> applied to aii>' Party 4,1 14, an>' Circuillstallce 1% adjudged h> a Culli-110 |le will or unelltilreeithle. the Haille will ill 11(, way all'eet 2111> l,tlier prouslon (11' thiN Agreement. the application „i any such prin ihion Ill any other circumst,Ince. 01 the J :111lity. or enforce,ihility 1,1 tlie Agreement ;1% a \# ht,le. 33. \11 NOR (.*11 .,LIEN. I his Agicenicni lia. been iipproved iii sub>,1.intiall> [he forin 4,111,ilitted to the gl,Verning hi,ille. 111' the P.Imes. The oftlcer. CACCLIting Illib Aglecmellt are ituthori/ed to make and nia>' have made. minor changes to this Agreement und :ittached e,hihils :10 the>/ |10\ c CC,11#i del'Cl| 11/Cc»al-> . St, lotic Il. bllch Cllailgeh li ele o Ilihi>·tent N ith the intelli und ulll|e!-4!anding of tile Partle> at the tlille (,1 .Ippluuil h> the ginerning hediex. tlic exceution ofthe Agreellient \\ ill con>tillite t|le mvrout| 01 hitch cluingo b> the ropective Parties. 34.DAYS. If the day fur any pei-Ilinnance or c, ent prin ided fur herein is a Satiliday, a Suriday. a day on which nalic,nal banks arc not open 12,1- the regular trill,Nactions of husille+4. (,r a 1 egal linlida> purs lit 1 111 1< ) Sectil) 11 24 - 11- 101(1).(.R.S..site|1 (| Ely will bee,tended l!1111| thelle\t day 011 H Illch blich hailk. and state cillice. are .,pen |ill- the trillivaction (,1 1,UNilleSS. 35.GOOD F,41'111 OF PARTIES. In the performance (,f t|11. Agreement or in o,tisidering 011> ]Cliliested approval. coll.e!11. liccept,ince. 01 c\Icll>ton 01 tillie. tlic Pintic> agree flint each H ill act ill got,d litith and u ill not act unreast,nably. arbitr:irily. CL,priciously. (,1' unreahonilbly witlilic,Id, cenditii),1. c,r ,!clay an> appriwal. accept:ince. or e,ten>.ion of time relillited 01 requested pursuant to this Agreement. 36 PART IliS N 01 PAI<-1 \ERS. Notuithstatiding any I:wiguage in this Agreement or any t,ther agreement. representalion. i,1- wairanty to the conli'ary, Ille Panics will m,[ be deemed lo be pall llcrb 4,1 -loilil \ Clit literb. und no P.li-tv 1% IC.pollsible 14,1- all> debt or |tabilit> 01 any other Part>·. I 7 37. NO WAIVER OF IMMUNITY. Nothing contained in this Agreement constitutes a wai, er of smereign immullity or gmenlinental immunity b> the Authority under applicable state lau'. [The remainder M' this page is intentic,iiall> left I,lank.] l 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by the Parties as of (JA ' 2015. WIfEAT RIDGE URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY All EST: A A -(3/3*H Patrick Goff, Executive Di Notice Address: Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority 7500 West 2gth Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Attention: Patrick Goff. Executive Director R.mail: pgoff@ci.wheatridge.co.us WES1 ENI) 38, LLC, a Colorado limited liability conipany Namt'. , 1/.r 4 , Dot••- S Title:,/MA.1.90-4- Notice Address: West End 38, LLC 2300 15th Street, Suite 235 Denver. Colorado 80202 Attention: Tyler Downs Email: tdowns@wazeepartners.com 1.0 19 EXI]IBil A- 1 LEGAL DESCRIP-1 ION Or THE PROPERTY 1 11*,ve parcels (111.ilic|. Mitinite. |> ing anc| lieing in the County 01'Jeffe,34,11. City 01 \\ heat Ridge. State of Colot-aill). Ilicludilig Ililprmed |and. building Und unilliprosed adincent land. 111(111· pallicularl> known and dese,ihed as t/,lk,ws. to wit' P.ircel I : 1.(,1 1 . E.S. Allen Subdividon. Contailling a 1.!Illi ilir:, 4,1 .1(1.-Wl .5 square tuet: Parcel 2: Ta, ID Parcel #31)-234-()0-()88. enntaining a land area of 12.325 sqllare Ibet. and a gatilge litcilit> tillproveme111: P.Ii-ce! 3: 1 a\ II) Parcel #39-234-(X)-C)<4, ci,iiwining a land area of 53.84() quair feet. and u residential/oftice bllikling: imd Parcel 4: Ta# 11) Parcel #39-234-00-086, containing a land area 4,1 57.150 square Il·el, and an <,tlice'hank huildine. EXHIBI-1 A-2 LEG.At_ DESCRIP I ION' 01- 1 HE WEST END 38 111· AREA HLUSTRATION FOR ZONE LOT rrl'UATED IN TH]121 1/4 KerIYO, Z, a NE U, SBCTION 24. TU. RWW. OF THE S™,-M. CrrY OF WHEAT RJIXE. COUNTY OF JEPPERION. rrAIS OF CaOIADO A89'30'48»E 354.09' t.t 416- I *489'38'12'E 131.83'1=1-6 b,< -.-- ZONE LOT - POINT OF BEGINNING SM'34'48-W A 197.537 SQ. n.. CP 4.535 ACPES * g#- 1 F- Z VICINITY MAP r- 1 1I 989'38'24'W_ 354.42' =.. . 44,1 A. V .MAVE :tru GRAPHIC SCALE Ti TIling/als..-C m UU :uxvrr ,-r ) 1 1-h- 100 n -S UNE™Al- DIES NOT 1-EINT A 1,01[U-,TE» m,f¥. IT I IMID®ED C»LY TO DEPICT TIE ATTAGED 028£-11011. INONIED MY: FAL£*»4 n,InE¥,4 IC, -40 NOR 251,4 AVE. LAIZIQI CO EAB (303»(12-1180 t 1 1 A-1 1.1·.GAL DEN('RIPTION FOR U ENT END 18 TIF AREA d P,Alt( l l c )1 1 A\I) 1 ( }CA I LL) IN 11!F %( )lillIEAN 1 1.4 (,1 >,1-( -l loN 23. 1 ( }WN>Ai ll .4 %0U1 11. RAN(iii 64 \\ EST OF 1-111: (nii PRINCIP.11, MERIDIAN. AND THE NORTHEAS1 1,4 01 XI:( 11()N 2(1.1(1\\'NSHIP .1 S<)l 'TIE RANGE 69 \VES i c )1- 11{E 6-in PRINCIPAI 11[·.Rl DI ·\N C I li (11 \\ 11EAI !21[)( iE. Col NTY ()1- JEI: 11:RM)\. SI·\IEOF COLC )1<Al)( ). HEING M<)R!· PARTICULAR[ i DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: a )\1\1ENCING Al 1111: SOUTH 1 4 CORNER OF SECTK)N 23 1-1()11 \\ I lliNCE 11 IF 4()lyl HFAS-I C 'ORNER OF SAID SECTION 23 HEARS N 89°38'24-- E A DIST ANC'E C)F 2633.65 FEEl \\'1111 ALL BFAIINGK HEREIN RFI Al l\'I: THERET(): 1-1 1 ENCE N 75°4(,'4(r EA DISI Ah( 'E OF 542.64 1-Elil 1()Till POINT OF BEGINNING: [l[ENCE N on l{)'12" \\'. Al ()r(i -11!E \\'[%113\E 01 .·\ PARCEL OI- L.AND Ah DI SCRIBI:D IN DI:[·1) RI C (11<1)11) IN .lifil·liR>40\ COUNTY RECORDFRS 01· Il('1< liNDER RFCFPTIc)N Nl.+1113 i·R 1·(1()50(,1 1 A DI>,1 ANCE OF 200.55 FE E-1 . THENCE N 89'38'12" E A! ONG 1111: NOR 1!1 1.IN [- C)I SAH) l'AR< 111_ A DIS1 ANC'E C )1 1 11.83 FI ET TO1111· >,()llil\VE.Sl CORNER 01· 1.(H L [ S ALLEN %1 131)1\01%10) AS RECORDED IN .11 1 Fl RSON COUNTY RE:('c)It[)1:Rh OFFIE L·. liNDI·R RECIPT ION Nl MBER 2()1(j(}(_1()(190. I l lENCE N 00< 12'07" W, Al ONG I l lE \VEST LINE 01 %.-111) UY[ 1 A DIS I ANCE Oi l 19.99 1-EET: 1 HENCE N 89-38'48" li. Al ONG THE N< )Ri l l [ INI· 01· SAI[ ) LCH I A [)141 A\( 1 ( )1 354.09 FEET TO TI IF FAST R Ic il l I OF WAY 1.INF 01· UPH ·\\1 STRI: FT ·\S PER EASEMENT DOCUMEN I RECORDIii) IN ,Ilil-Flil<NON C ()UNT¥ RF.( c )1(1)1·11% (411('E liNI)1·11 RFC[-Pl ION NUMBFR 44113597: 11!ENCE S (1(1 13'(33" 1·.. Al.()NG SAII) L:\%1 1(1(ill I ()F WAY I Ill: Al)INT.ANCt (>[- 483.01 1 EET -1() l illi M)lj i ll R](,111 OF WAY LINE OF \VI·%1 38111 ,AVENt + Ah il· R HASI{MEN'I DOCUMENTS RECORDED IN.IEFF!·RhON CALININ RI·COR[)[·*RN OF FIC'El,'\DER 1<1·Cl·Pl IC)N MINIHI·.14% (ji}(MN¢,570, 90086575. l)()(18(1572 .AN[) 90086573: 11 IENCE S S<)«38'24" W. ALONG SAID fiC)LITII RIGI 11- 01 U .AY LINE A DIS I AN( Ii ( )F 354.42 FEET. THENCE N 00 11'13" \V. A DIST ANCE <)1· 162 65 FF.ET 10 HIE SC)lri ll LINE OF A PARCH OF LAND AS DESCRIBI.D IN DE.liI) RECORDED IN .lEn·ERSON ('01 INTY RECORDERS (-)[ FICE UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER Ff)05061 l A: [HENCES>49'134'48" \V. ALONG SAID Sc )1 '1111 INE A DIS-IANCE (11 131.79 FEETTA lilli POINT OF BE(;INNING. C ON 1-:\ I NI NCi: 1 (37.537 Sol 'ARE 1-F l· I ()R 4 535 ACR[-% 01 1 .\NI). 11()1{1· OR [ ESS. EXHIBVI B DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT 1-he Preiect cons!ts oft|le relles elt,pment (,1 appit,>.illizilely 3.67 acres of the I'loperty. uhich is located at ilie nnrtlinest collier of \Vest 38'11 A, enue and l i,ham Street in the City <,f \\ heatridge. The Proiect is expected to be con>.tructed in tu» phases. The Pri,Ject 15 /uned 6,1 -\liwil l'se-C'(,11111iercial (Ml -C) and shall incel all the ethacks and design standards as per the City of \\heat Ridge zoning ec,de. It is expected thal ali,ng 3>(th Avenue. tile Project uill fuature st!-ect-|*,liting grollild tli,or remil sliops und restaurants with No levels of reAdenco :111<ne fi,1- u totil of three sic,ries, Further west oil Ilic Property uill he a free standing hank huililing. Behind these tuo bulldings uill he a parking court> ard ,\ illi :Ii,i,17),imatel>* 88 parking .paces and u li,l]1- st<,ry residential buililing. The residential buililing will mchide a parking Structure u 1111 appi(\imately 138 parking graces. The I'ruject will consist of appnnimately 150 residences and apprciriniatel> 1.3.800 Mqual-c luet Mhrtil space. H-l t\1111311 C ELIGIBLE IMPROVEMENTS The Eligible huprovements arc .et forth in the table below. The costs fur the liligible Impri,rements as set li,rth in the table belou are estimates. The ecist amount in each line ilcm iii tlie lable heli,w may lie increa<ed or decreased as directed hy Developer, Accordingly. Cost savings in t,ne line item ma> he applied to inclease tile amount of reimbursable costs in „ther line items. I lu\, czer. tllitu 1111latililing :111> lither pit,\ iwc,11 01- 1111+ Agreement Eligible Co#ts tu be paid Br reimhursed from the Pledged Revenues shall not erceed Four Million Eight I |undred Tlic,usand Dull:irs ($4.800.(HM)) as Net furth in this Agreement. and shall be paid I Ir re,111bursed scilely from Pledged Re, Cllues ill accordance with Ilic Agreement. it IRIBLE MIPRO\EMENTS Demolition and Environment:11 Abatement Utilities (Water. Sewer. Electric. Gas, Storm \\ ater und Relocations'Bitrying IC) 1 ,AL El-1(jIBLE COSTS $ 39().869 1.131.680 Streets. Sidewalks. Plaza. ilaiziscape.1 308.409 Landscaping and Facades Parking Gui,ige 2.378.167 Soft Costs (Architecture. Engineering. Permitting. I itiancing. Legal and Fees) 837.343 Tl, t.t 1 95.946.476 C.- 1 L \HUMT[) 1 ()RM 01· PROJEC'l COMPLI-1 ION CER rli l('ATE Wheal Ridge l-Irhan Rene„al Alithority 75(10 \Vest 29' Avenue Wheat 1<idge. Coll)!aill, Al)(}33 Attention: Erecutive Director 1 |ie illitierIgned representatne ot \Vev lind 18. El C (the -Des di,per-') hereby makes the 10114,\4 mu vertilications m accord.Ilice #uth the trrins :tile| prt,6 isions lif xection .3.1 (a) of the Recle, clerment Agreement dated as 1,16 _ .2(115 (the "Recle,clopmen, Agreement") hetneen the \Vhe:it Ridge Urban Renewal Authc,rity and De, ell,per. Ail Caritalited ter!11$ liNed hercill 4111,1 1101 (Itlienflbe tictilled shall |Une the illeilli]Ily>, Sct lort|1 111 tile Ride\clopilient Agreciii ent. The 14)]linfing conditionh have been sitistied 4,1- waiced in writing by the F \ectiti,e D 1 1 ( c I C) i' 1 . The Property has been acquired 11>' the De\eloper. 2. Subst .intially all c )1 the Eligible hnprovement. thal are pul,lic improvements 111.11 Devell,per i> requil'Cil ti, inst:1|| plirsuant to the Subdivisidn Implinement Agreement and the site plan hin c been ('ompleted. 3. An apartment compleA (,11 the Propert> Hith at le:1%1 1 10 apartment units has Ileen Completed. 4. At least 8.(HH) square feet of retail space has been Cenipleted on the Propert). 5. Nt, 1.renb 01 Default b> De, cloper 118\ c occurred und .tre contilliting under tile Rede\elopillent Agi-eenient. 1-Ile 1(,tal all-Il,Litit <,1 Eligible Cobts lot U Inell icillibur.eitient is requested Is $ bi'|lich amount s|lili| not exceed 54,800.000), Attached ki this Ce,-tilicate 1% documentation related m the Eligible Costs incurred by the De, cloper in connection u ith the fill:Incing. acquisiticill. Clilibll-lictic,11 aill| installation 01' the 1:ligible Iniprovements li,r \i Ilich such icillibul-hcluent i. requested. The tbregoing certification shall cunstitute thi· Project (- 01„pictic)11 Celliticatc undet the Rede, elopmelit Agreeiiwilt. West End 3 x. 1.1 C. a Gdorado limited hability c<,nipany [)ate:Bi: Name: Title: 1)- 1 \\'ithin thirt> 00) days 01 receipt 4,1 this Cellilicate by the Alttlic,lit>. the Al,lhorit> hhall coni],]cle the applicable prin ision lielos and remit to Des eloper: The Authorit> hereby verifies 111:11: (a) thi. Prgiect Completic,n Certificate coniplies uith the termb and Collditic,ns <,1- tlic· Recle, eli,pment Agi cement ;ind 111:11 the C„liditil,11. precedent set forth m Seclion 3.1 4,ftile Rede, ch,pment Agrecment hine been satislied (,r naRed in writing b> the Execliti\C Ditrill,r. lind {b) tile documentation sulitilitted with 11114 Cerlific:tie is sullicient 14, u,-il'> ilial tile· Reunbursement Amount requested plll suant 10 1111* Certificate ha been :lili,Cated to the rellilbul-#ement (,f Eligible· c.'ubts inciti-red m connection \\ ith 1 ligible hupic,\ements in accordance with the [tedevelopment Agreenient, 1*lie Authorit> herchy notifies De,Cluper t|lai (a) tile Alithorit> disputes that tile Cliliditions precellent set furth in Section 3.1 01 the Reile, elapinent Agreement bin c been Satistied (,1- \\ :lived. und (11 (b) 111£11 ilie doclitiletilittion slibinitted uith this Certificate is not >11!licient ti, \'inf> thai the k,tal Reimbul'semint Allic,unt requebted purbllant In lili> Cellilicati 1% 12)1' the reimbunement of Eligible Cast mcunrd Iii Cunnection with Higible 11111'rm ements. Set furth belin, ic a detailed explitnation of the reasons n hy the Autlitu'It) di>,plites that these c<,nditions preardell| Iline been fillistied 4,1 wai\Cd or that Slle|1 iii>Cll]11©11!110111, ill%111|ICICilt: \\IlizAT RIDGE l'RBAN RENI-\\ Al Al'111ORll Y Date: By: Name: Title: L)-2 I \1111311 L. I c )1{ Al c )1· X C )1 E 1'11()111»011; NOTE 11\\1\ll'11 4\1( H NI. l h 34.800.{)(H) .3)15 FOR rAill Rl (11\'FI). \\111 \1 RII)GE URBAN RI:N[-\VAL Alll·101111\ D B A 1<1-NE\\ ·\1 \\ 111 ·\ 1 1<11)(il:. a public hod> curpurate und lic,litic Jul> c,rgani/ed and e\,Ming a. an urban teneual authorit> undi·1 1|le I im + 01* the State 01 C olorado (lierematter refened to a# -Atillic,rit>"). promise> to paY to the order of West End .18. 1.[.('. a Colorado hillited liabilit> compally. imil Ith .LICCL»Ors (lierel 11.ilict relericd 10 .14 '1)c\ cli,lier"). al the 11*fice l,1 De; Cli,per. (,r MIC|1 plitee ah i)c; eloper may th,111 time Ii, time ile>ignale in iriling. the mainnum >um 01 1(>l R Al!1 LIC)\ 11(illl Ill.!NI)Ittl) 111(,LISAND [)01 LARS (l S 04.X{H).000) or .lich lesset :11114,unt due In,m Ille Authorit> 141 Deu:loper put >,uant to tile terms 01 the Rede, elormen, Agreement dated M even date lierewith (the -Reile, clopment Agreement") h> and heMeen the Authorit> and Developer. in lawful mone> ofthe 1 'nited States of America All capitalized ternh liNed and not i,theri, 1.e defined herein shall have the rexpectn e meanings aserihed 111 the Relles elopment Agreement. 1-lii s Note bliall n idence thi (,bligation of ilic Ruthe )1 it> to pa> thi· Reitill,ill-Ne]Ill'Ill Amount to De\elt,per in accor<latice uith Ilie term and i,1-i ,\ i *ions of ilic 14£·ile,elt Ilititeni Agl-cement. but solel> Irt,Iii the Pledged Ri'\ el,tles. No iliterew 011:111 accrite on thih Note. I hi4 Note shall mature on Nin ember I. 21)40. Netwill).tanding an> prousion to the control-> contained herein 01 in the Recle\elopmetil Agreement. no amounts shall he due and p.i> able under this NBte unle'%% (,1 until the Condition. precedent set lorth m Xectic,11 3.1 of tile Reile, clopinent Agiceincni hitic been sati.fied or unned In the I·,Leculn c Directoi-. All p.,>111ent> hereunder sh:ill lic made to Developil 111 accul'llance with the Rcilci clopment Agreement. This Note shall be payable. mature and he enforceal,le pursuant to the terms and pro, ision. 01 the Relic\Clopment Agreement. liptin receipt ef an> 1,41>'ments made h> the Authorit> on this Note. De; elt,per hall record the pil>ment. 04, recened on the Table of Outstanding Reinibursement Amount attached Ii, this Nute und h> this reterence made a part herent. I his Note *liall lic a .1,ecial and hillited obligation l,t Ilic· Alttlic:I'll> i,ii>able solel> Irt,in the Pledged Res enuch. I hc Pledged Re, ellue. are herch> pleilged to the pa>iment of this N,Ble I lic <,bligation k, trimburbe De\eli,per Ii,r [·ligible C '(,Mts. which i,1,ligation i> evidenced 1,> this Nete. is and 11:111 be a hpecial and linmed c,bligatic,n (,t the Aut|ic,rit> .ecured hy an irrewcable pledge 01. and payable sc,lel> Irc,m the Pledged Reumues. Des clopul ma> not look to an> general or other fund of the Authorit> Ii,r the payment on this Note e\cert the Pledged Rei enue.. Thi> Note %11:ill not constitute an indebtedness. financial obligation or liahilit> of the C 'it> or the State or ali> counl>. mullicipalit> (,r pitlilic hod> there'„t. and liellher the Cit>. the 41.Ite nor .in> political hul,(li \ Ision theret,1 :liall lie liable theret,n. not ill :,11> cumt shall Ihis Nute 1 -1 be pa>able out til any funds 4,1- 1,1-(,ilel-ties (,ther than the Pledged Rei ellues. 1-unher. this Note shall nut Constitute a debt. indebtedne». finalicial i,bligation or liabilll> i,fthe City uithin the meaning t, t an> ccuistitutional. stallitory {,r Challer lIeht limitation or provisitin. This Note is gi,\ crned by and interpreted in acci,ril:Ince uith the hiws al the State 01 (.4,11,1,Kc). Pursuant to Section 11-57-21(h,fthe Ct,loracit, 14·u:ed St:mites. as amended. this Note t entered into puisuant to certitin prcn isic,11, I,1till· Supplemental Public Securities Act. being Title 11. Anicle 57. 81 the (91|l,railt, Res ised Statutes. as amended. Such recital sh:111 he Conchisive evilience oftile uilidity and the regill:Ilit>' 4,1 theissuatice i,1 this Note aliet deliu·r> fur value. 11- an> rim ision in this Nme i. held invalid. illegal i,r unenforecable in an> jurisdiction. the utliclity. legalit> *,1- elili,rceabilit> „f Lin> defecti,C pro,isions sliall not impair the wilidity. legably or ellic,iceribility ofany other pro, Rion of this Note. All notices under this Ni,le must be ent W the addresses given in. and m accordance u illi ille prin INIt,11% of. tile Recles eltil,inent Agreement. 1 111·. PROUMIONS 01· 1 111% NOTE MA¥ BE AXIENDE[) OR REUSED ONIA 14\IN INSTRn]ENT IN \,1411*ING %1(;NED B¥ 1 *IE Alr'I HORITY AND DEVELOPER. IN \VITNESS U 111·REOF. an authori/ed rept'esentalisC t,1 the Wheat Ridge l'rhan Retie„ al Authuril> d 1,/3 ReneWal \\'licat Ridge has executed tills Promiss<,ry Nute as ef the· da> and year first abo, c \\ ritten. WHEAT RIDGIF l'RBAN RE:NF\VAL AUTHARITY [SE,·\11 ATTEST:Kristi Davis. Chairperson P.ittick Goff. Execittive Director E-2 1 ·\Blt 01 OUTS-1 ANDING REI\1Blil<SEMEN I AMOUNT Fntal Reimbursement Amount Due Under this Nole: Date of Proiect Cnmpletic,11 Certificate: On each November I. the owner of this Note shall make the appropriate nt,tatic,n on the table below relating to the pa>ment (,faniounts due on this Note. Ill'gl 11/1 lily Date Outstanding Balance Amount Paid on Note Remaininu Balance E-3 EX 1 1 IBil F FORM OF SUBI)1\ ISION I\IPI<OVEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this of , by and between the CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO, a home rule municipal corporation (the "City"), and ,(the "Developer"), together referred to as the "Parties". RECITALS: The Developer is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Wheat Ridge, which is more particularly described in Exhibit A and made a part hereof (the 'Property").commonly known as On , the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, after holding all required public hearings. approved the final plal for the Properly titled A copy of the Final Plat is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. The approvals cited above are contingent upon the express condition that all duties created by this Agreement be faithfully performed by the Developer. AGREEMENT NOW, therefore. for and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the sufficiency of which are mutually acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth the terms, conditions, and fees to be paid by the Developer upon subdivision of the Property All conditions contained herein are in addition to any and all requirements of the City of Wheat Ridge Subdivision Ordinance and Zoning Ordinance, the City of Wheat Ridge Charter, any and all state statutes, and any other sections of the City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code and are not intended to supersede any requirements contained therein 2. Other Requirements. See Exhibit attached hereto. 3. Fees. The Developer hereby agrees to pay City Development Review fees to the City for engineering, hydrological, surveying, legal, and other services rendered in connection with the review of the subdivision of the Property 4. Parkland dedication fee-in lieu. Fees in lieu of land dedication. when required, shall be calculated pursuant to the formula in Section 26-413 and shall be paid at the time of plat recordation. F-1 5. Title Policy Prior to recording of the final plat (or, if no plat is associated with the development, prior to and as a condition of final approval of the development by the City), title commitment for all those portions of the Property, as well as any other interests in real property (easements. etc ) to be reserved for public purposes or dedicated to the City shall be provided to the City The title commitment shall show that all such property is or shall be, subsequent to the execution and recording of this Agreement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances (other than real estate taxes which are not yet due and payable) which would make the dedication or reservation unacceptable as the City determines in its reasonable discretion The City. in its sole discretion, may accept any dedication regardless of encumbrances. The title policy evidenced by the title commitment shall be provided within thirty (30) days after the recording of this Agreement, in an amount equal to the fair market value of the property so dedicated or reserved 6. Breach bv the Developer; the City's Remedies In the event of a breach of any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement by the Developer, the City Council shall be notified immediately and the City may take such action as permitted and/or authorized by law, this Agreement. or the ordinances and Charter of the City as the City deems necessary to protect the public health. safety and welfare: to protect lot buyers and builders; and to protect the citizens of the City from hardship and undue nsk These remedies include, but are not limited to (a) The refusal to issue any building permit or certificate of occupancy: (b) The revocation of any building permit previously issued under which construction directly related to such building permit has not commenced, except a building previously issued to a third party, (c) A demand that the security given for the completion of the Public Improvements be paid or honored, 01 (d) Any other remedy available at law or in eqijity Unless necessary to protect the immediate health, safely and welfare of the City or to protect the City'sinterest with regard to security given for the completion of the Public Improvements, the City shall provide the Developer thirty (30) days written notice of its intent to take any action under this paragraph during which thirty day period the Developer may cure the breach described in the notice. 7. Public Improvements and Warranty All storm sewer lines, drainage structures. paved streets, curb, gutter and sidewalk, including the undergrounding of all overhead utilities. and necessary appurtenances as shown on the subdivision plat and the associated construction documents (the "Public Improvements" or ' Improvements") as approved by the Director of Public Works or designee of the City, shall be installed and completed at the expense of the Developer within the timeframes set forth in Section 10 of this Agreement. The itemized costs of the Public Improvements required by this Agreement and shown on the construction documents approved by the Director of Public Works of the City are set forth on Exhibit C All Public Improvements covered 1.- by this Agreement shall be made in accordance with the construction documents drawn according to regulations and construction standards for such improvement and approved by the Director of Public Works of the City It is understood by the Parties that the description of the Public Iniprovements may be general in nature, and that reasonable modifications of the scope, nature, costs, and similar aspects of the Public Improvements may be necessary to secure final approval of the Public Improvements The quantities and locations for the Public Improvements are based on information that was available at the time of approval of the Final Plat Additional Public Improvements may be required, and Developer shall be responsible for submitting revisions to the Final Plat approved by the City. The Public Improvements shall be substantially complete, with only such exceptions as shall be approved in advance by the Director of Public Works in the exercise of his or her sole discretion. prior to the issuance of the first Building Permit. The Developer shall also warrant ally and all Public Improvements which are conveyed to the City pursuant to this Agreement for a period of two (2) years from the date the City's Director of Public Works certifies that the same conforms to the specifications approved by the City. Specifically, but not by way of limitation, the Developer shall warrant the following: (a) That the title conveyed shall be marketable and its transfer rightful. (b) Any and all facilities conveyed shall be free from any security interest or other lien or encumbrance: and (c) Any and all facilities so conveyed shall be free of defects in materials or workmanship for a period of two (2) years as stated above. (d) To the degree the Developer is required to install and maintain landscaping on public or private properly, it is the obligation of Developer and its successors and assigns, to maintain the required landscaping in perpetuity The City will finally accept for maintenance all Public Improvements, exclusive of landscaping materials, after the warranty period has expired provided all warranty work has been completed. The City shall accept for snow removal purposes only, all dedicated public streets after the City issues the first certificate of occupancy. 8 Installation of Traffic Signal A traffic signal may be required to serve this development Determination of the need for the signal shall be made by the City's Public Works Director, hereinafter Director'*, prior to building permit issuance and based upon a traffic study for this development approved by the City The Developer shall provide collateral for the estimated cost of installation of the traffic signal prior to building permit issuance, if the Director has determined that a signal is needed. Prior to building permit issuance, the Developer shall provide traffic signal plans for approval by the Developer and the Colorado Depanment of Transporlation 1·-3 The Developer shall notify the City in writing, a minimum of one hundred sixty (160) days prior to the desired time of installation/modification of the traffic signal in order to allow the City to coordinate the timing of the traffic signal improvements If the Director approves installation of the signal based on meeting traffic warrants, the City shall then notify the Developer in writing of the exact amount required for the traffic signal improvements. The Developer shall then make payment to the City in cash for the required amount within sixty (60) days of receipt of such letter. The City will not commence traffic signal improvements until the Developer has patel to the City the total amount determined by the Director to be the total cost of improvements 9, Observation. Inspection and Testing The City shall have the right to require reasonable engineering observations and testing at the Developer's expense. Observation and testing, acquiescence in, or approval by any engineering inspector of the construction of physical facilities at any particular time shall not constitute the approval by the City of any portion of the construction of such Public Iniprovements Such approval shall be made by the City, only after completion of construction and in the manner hereinafter set forth The Drector is designated by the City to exercise authority on its behalf under this Agreement and to see that this Agreement is performed according to its terms. Work under this Agreement may, without cost or claim against the City, be suspended by the Director for substantial cause. The Director shall, within a reasonable time after presentation, make decisions in writing on all claims of Developer and on all other matters relating to the execution and progress of the work or the interpretation of this Agreement. the master plan and specifications All such decisions of the Director shall be final The Director shall make all determinations of amounts and quantities of work performed hereunder. To assist him in this work Developer shall make available for inspection any records kept by Developer The Director shall make all determinations of amounts and quantities of work performed hereunder To assist him in this work Developer shall make available for inspection any records kept by Developer. The Director and his authorized representatives shall have free access to the work at all times, and Developer shall furnish them with facilities for ascertaining whether the work being performed, or the work which has been completed, is in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement The Director will make periodic observations of construction (sometimes commonly referred to as "supervision' ) The purpose of these observations and construction checking is to determine the progress of the work and to see if the work is being performed in accordance with the plans and specifications He will in no way be 1 -4 responsible for how the work is performed, safety in, on, or about the job site, methods of performance. or timeliness in the performance of the work. Inspectors may be appointed to inspect materials used and work done. Inspections may extend to all or any part of the work and to the preparation or manufacture of the materials to be used. The inspectors will not be authorized to alter the provisions of this Agreement or any specifications or to act as foreman for Developer The Inspector will have authority to reject defective materials and to suspend any work that is being done improperly, subject to the final decision of the Director. 10.Completion of Public Improvements. The obligations of the Developer provided for in paragraph 6 of this Agreement, including the inspections hereof, shall be performed on or before ,and proper application for acceptance of the Public Improvements shall be made on or before such date. Upon completion of construction by the Developer of such Improvements, the City's Director of Public Works or designee, shall inspect the Improvements and certify with specificity its conformity or lack thereof to the City's specifications The Developer shall make all corrections necessary to bring the Improvements into conformity with the City's specifications. Once approved by the City's Director of Public Works. the City shall accept said Improvements upon conveyance: provided, however, the City shall not be obligated to accept the Public Improvements until the actual costs described in this Agreement are paid in full by the Developer. 11 Protection Developer. at its expense, shall continuously maintain adequate protection of all Improvements from damage prior to acceptance by the City and shall protect the City's property from injury and loss arising in connection with this Agreement Developer shall make good any such damage, injury or loss except such as may be caused directly by authorized agents or employees of the City. Developer shall adequately protect adjacent property and shall provide and maintain all passageways, guard fences. lights and other facilities for protection required by public authority or local conditions. Developer shall be responsible for damage to any public and private property on and adjacent to the site of Developer's Improvements caused by negligent or willful acts of Developer, its agents or subcontractors Developer shall take all reasonable effort necessary to prevent damage to pipes, conduits, and other underground structures and to overhead wires. and to water quality. Developer shall protect carefully from disturbance or damage all land monuments and property marks until an authorized agent of the City has witnessed or otherwise referenced their location. and shall not remove them until directed When any direct or indirect damage or injury is dorie to public or private property by or on account of any act, omission, neglect or misconduct in the construction of Improvements, or in consequence of the non-execution thereof on his part, such damaged properly shall be restored by Developer at its own expense to a condition similar or equal to thal existing before such damage or inJury. F-5 Developer shall at all times. whether or not so specifically directed by the Director, take necessary precautions to insure the protection of the public. Developer shall furnish, erect and maintain, at its own expense, all necessary barricades, suitable and sufficient red lights, construction signs, provide a sufficient number of watchmen, and take all necessary precautions for the protection of the work and safety of the public through or around his construction operations as Developer and the Director shall deem reasonably necessary 12.Related Costs - Public Improvements The Developer shall provide all necessary engineering designs, surveys, field surveys, testing and incidental services related to the construction of the Public Improvements at its sole cost and expense, including final drainage study letter certified accurate by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. 13 Improvements to be the Properly of the City All Public Improvements for roads, concrete curb and gutters, public storm sewers and public drainage improvements accepted by the City shall be dedicated to the City and warranted for a period of twenty-four (24) months following acceptance by the City, as provided above 14 Performance Guarantee In order to secure the construction and installation of the Public Improvements the Developer shall, prior to recording the Final Plat, if applicable, in the real estate records of Jefferson County, which recording shall occur no later than ninety (90) days after tile execution of this Agreement, furnish the City, at the Developer's expense, with the Performance Guarantee described herein The Performance Guarantee provided by the Developer shall be an Irrevocable letter of credit in which the City is designated as beneficiary, for one hundred twenty-five percent (125%) of the estimated costs of the Public Improvements to be constructed and installed as set forth in Exhibit C, if applicable to secure the performance and completion of the Public Improvements as required by Section 26-418 Security for Required Improvements, of the Wheat Ridge Subdivision Regulations. The Developer agrees that approval of this Agreement by the City is contingent upon the Developer's provision of an irrevocable letter of credit to the City within ninety (90) days of the execution of this Agreement in the amount and form provided herein. Failure of the Developer to provide an irrevocable letter of credit to the City in the manner provided herein shall negate the City's approval of this Agreement Letters of credit shall be substantially in the form and content set forth in Exhibit D, if applicable, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney The Developer shall not start any construction of any public or private improvement on the Property including, but not Innited to, staking. earthwork, overlot grading or the erection of any structure, temporary or otherwise, until the City has received and approved the irrevocable letter of credit. The estimated costs of the Public Improvements shall be a figure mutually agreed upon by the Developer and the City's Director of Public Works, as set forth in Exhibit C if applicable. If, however, they are unable to agree, the Director of Public Works estimate shall govern after giving consideration to information provided by the Developer including, but not limited to, construction contracts and engineering estimates The purpose of the cost estimate is solely to determine the amount of security. No representations are made as to the accuracy of these estimates, and the Developer agrees to pay the actual costs of all such Public Improvements. The estimated costs of the Public Improvements may increase in the future Accordingly the City reserves the right to review and adjust the cost estimate on an annual basis If the City adjusts the cost estimate for the Public Improvements, the City shall give written notice to the Developer The Developer shall, within thirty (30) days after receipt of said written notice, provide the City with a new or amended letter of credit in the amount of the adjusted cost estimates. If the Developer refuses or fails to so provide the City with a new or amended letter of credit, the City may exercise the remedies provided for in this Agreement, provided. however, that prior to increasing the amount of additional security required. the City shall give credit to the Developer for all required Public Improvements which have actually been completed so that the amount of security required at all time shall relate to the cost of required Public Improvements not yet constructed. In the event the Public Improvements are not constructed or completed within the period of time specified by paragraph 9 of this Agreement or a written extension of time mutually agreed upon by the parties to this Agreement, the City may draw on the letter of credit to complete the Public Improvements called for in this Agreement In the event the letter of credit is to expire within fourleen (14) calendar days and the Developer has not yet provided a satisfactory replacement, the City may draw on the letter of credit and either hold such funds as security for performance of this Agreement or spend such funds to finish Public Improvements or correct problems with the Public Improvements as the City deems appropriate. Upon completion of performance of such improvements, conditions and requirements within the required time, the Developer shall issue an irrevocable letter of credit to the City In the amount of twenty-five percent (25%) of the total cost of construction and installation of the Public Improvements, to be held by the City during the warranty period If the Public Improvements are not completed within the required time, the monies may be used to complete the improvements. 15.Indemnification. The Developer shall indemnity and hold harmless the City and its officers. employees, agents or servants from any and all suits, actions. and claims of every nature and description caused by, arising from or on account of this Agreement any act or omission of the Developer, or of any other person or entity for whose act or omission the Developer is liable, with respect to the Public Improvements: and the Developer shall pay any and all judgments rendered against the City as a result of any suit, action, or claim, together with all reasonable expenses and attorney's fees and costs incurred by the City in defending any such suit, action or claim The Developer shall pay all property taxes on the Property dedicated to the City and shall indemnify and hold harmless the City for any property tax liability. 1;.7 16 Waiver of Defects In executing this Agreement, the Developer waives all objections it may have concerning defects, if any, in the forrnalities whereby it is executed, or concerning the power of the City to impose conditions on the Developer as set forth herein. and concerning the procedure, substance, and form of the ordinances or resolutions adopting this Agreement 17.Third Partv Beneficiaries There are and shall be no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement 18.Modifications. This instrument embodies the whole agreement of the Parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein: and this Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties. There shall be no modification of this Agreement except in writing, executed with the same formalities as this instrument Subject to the conditions precedent herein. this Agreement may be enforced in any couM of competent jurisdiction. 19.Release of Liability. It is expressly understood that the City cannot be legally bound by the representations of any of its agents or their designees except in accordance with the City of Wheat Ridge Code of Ordinances and the laws of the State of Colorado 20 Captions The captions to this Agreement are inserted only for the purpose of convenient reference and in no way define, limit, or prescribe the scope or intent of this Agreement or any part thereof 21 Binding Effect This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns as the case may be. 22.No Waiver, No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed or constitute a waiver of any other provisions herein, nor shall such waiver constitute a continuing waiver unless otherwise expressly provided, nor shall the waiver of any default hereunder be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default hereunder 23.Invalid Provision. If any provision of this Agreement shall be determined to be void by any courl of competent junsdiction, then such deternlination shall not affect any other provision hereof, all of the other provisions shall remain in full force and effect It is the intention of the Parties that if any provision of this Agreement is capable of two constructions. one of which would render the provision void, and the other which would render the provision valid, then the provision shall have the meaning which renders it valid. 24 Governing Law. The laws of the State of Colorado shall govern the validity, performance and enforcement of this Agreement Should either party institute 1·-8 legal suit or action for enforcement of any obligation contained herein, venue of such suit or action shall be in Jefferson County, Colorado. 25.Attorneys Fees. Should this Agreement become the subject of litigation to resolve a claim of default of performance or payment by the Developer and a coud of competent jurisdiction finds in favor of the City, the Developer shall pay the City's attorney's fees and court costs 26.Notice. All notices required under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be hand delivered or sent by registered or certified mail. return receipt requested, postage prepaid, to the addresses of the parties herein set forth. All notices so given shall be considered effective seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States mail with the proper address as set foMh below. Either party by notice so given may change the address to which future notices shall be sent. Notice to Developer: Notice to City Director of Public Works 7500 West 2gth Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 27.Force Maieure. Whenever the Developer is required to complete the construction, repair, or replacement of Public Improvements by an agreed deadline, the Developer shall be entitled to an extension of time equal to a delay in completing the foregoing due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Developer including, but not restricted to, acts of God, weather, fires and strikes. 28.Assianment or Assignments. There shall be no transfer or assignment of any of the rights or obligations of the Developer under this Agreement without the prior written approval of the City, 29.Recording of Agreement This Agreement shall be recorded in the real estate records of Jefferson County and shall be a covenant running with the Property in order to put prospective purchases or other interested parties on notice as to the terms and provisions hereof 30 Title and Authority. The Developer, , expressly warrants and represents to the City that it is the record owner of the property constituting the Property and further represents and warrants, together with the undersigned individual(s) that the undersigned individual(s) has or have full power and authority to enter into this Subdivision Improvement Agreement. The Developer and the undersigned individual(s) understand that the City is relying on such representations and warranties in entering into this Agreement. WHEREFORE, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first above written. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO By: Joyce Jay, Mayor ATTEST Janelle Shaver, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Gerald Dahl, City Attorney DEVELOPER By: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 . by ,as of Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public (SEAL) F. If) PC Hearing City of- Wheat Ridge POSTING CERTIFICATION CASE NO.MS-16-08 PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE:May 4,2017 I, 63 /45 226Lc)141- (name)residingat 1 40-0 (ku,(24 Laci, GlegY.Zuez.P l/<' lt.r-CO (add'ress)7,51 1 1 1 as the applicant for Case No.MS-16-08 hereby certify that I have posted the Notice of Public Hearing at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street (location) on this 208 day of April and do hereby certify that said sign has been posted and remained in place for fifteen (15) days prior to and including the scheduled day o f public hearing of this case. The sign was posted in the position shown on t the map below.Signature. 0 / /1'1·-1 U-1.)601'1 NOTE: This form must be submitted at the public hearing on this case and will be placed in the applicant's case file at the Community Development Department. MAP & lrA 11 11 NErv 1 1 t.. ··i' L A 20.4k - City ofW heatiqdge PUBLIC POSTING REQUIREMENTS One sign must be posted per street frontage. In addition, the following requirements must be met: • The sign must be located within the property boundaries. • The sign must be securely mounted on a flat surface. • The sign must be elevated a minimum of thirty (30) inches from ground. • The sign must be visible from the street without obstruction. • The sign must be legible and posted for fifteen (15) continuous days prior to and including the day of the hearing [sign must be in place until 5pm on May 4, 2017]. It is the applicant's responsibility to certify that these requirements have been met and to submit a completed Posting Certification Form to the Community Development Department. I 1 6 4 4 .. PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING COMMISSION May 4, 2017 Case No. MS-16-08: An application filed by Wazee Partners, LLC, for approval of a minor subdivision to replat the property from 5 parcels to 2 lots for property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) located at the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street. (Please print) Name Address In Favor/Opposed 62 rt 1 F< )r1.2 41 1* tzy k \0-445/ ¥r City of rl'W heat Ridge - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'h Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 LETTER NOTICE (As required pursuant to Code Section 26-109.D) April 19,2017 Dear Property Owner / Current Resident: This is to inform you of Case No. MS-16-08, an application filed by Wazee Partners, LLC, for approval of a minor subdivision to replat a property from 5 parcels to 2 lots for a property zoned Mixed Use Commercial (MU-C) and located at the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street. This request is scheduled for public hearing in the Council Chambers of the Municipal Complex at 7500 West 29th Avenue. The schedule is as follows: Planning Commission May 4,2017 @ 7:00 p.m., As an area resident or interested party, you have the right to attend this Public Hearing and/or submit written comments. If you have any questions or desire to review any plans, please contact the Planning Division at 303-235-2846. Thank you, City of Wheat Ridge Planning Division Individuals with disabilities are encouraged to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Ifyou need inclusion assistance, please call Sara Spaulding, Public Information Officer, at 303-235-2877 at least one week in advance of the meeting. www.ci.wheatridge.co.us L A Vicinitv Map Site U I il U- %Cr 11 3i 1?4 MS1608.doc 38 LTD 05387 NEWCOMBE ST ARVADA CO 80002 3885 UPHAM PROPERTIES LLC 03895 UPHAM ST STE-60 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 7403 WEST 38TH AVENUE LLC BRADLEY PETROLEUM INC 07268 S TUCSON WAY ENGLEWOOD CO 80112 EDWIN S ALLEN TRUST 14145 BRAUN RD GOLDEN CO 80401 FOX RUN LIVING LLC 06000 E EVANS AVE DENVER CO 80222 HORSESHOE BEACH DEVELOPMENT LLC 05500 W 44TH AVE DENVER CO 80212 JEFFERSON COUNTY SCHOOL DIST Rl 01829 DENVER WEST DR GOLDEN CO 80401 MC PREMIER INVESTMENTS LLC 07482 DEPEW ST ARVADA CO 80003 MOLASS CORP BEATON DANIEL R 03760 VANCE ST 100 WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 MOORE FAMILYTRUST 07521 TERRY CT ARVADA CO 80007 MUCILLI ANGELA MUCILLI PASQUALE 02940 WEBSTER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 N+B LLC PO BOX 6116 EAGLE CO 81631 OLIVE STREET DEVELOPMENT CO LLC 01801 BROADWAY 1175 DENVER CO 80202 RENWICK AVA NAGY LASZLO 03834 UNION CT WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 RHOADES TIMOTHY A RHOADES BROOKLYN 03745 TELLER ST WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 SEVENTY300 LLC 06565 S DAYTON ST 3000 GREENWOOD VILLAGE CO 80111 WADSWORTH BUILDING CORPORATION ACCOUNTING DEPT 01650 S COLORADO BLVD DENVER CO 80222 WHEAT RIDGE 08 A WHEAT RIDGE 08 A LLC 12411 VENTURA BLVD STUDIO CITY CA 91604 WHEAT RIDGE 08 A LLC 12411 VENTURA BLVD STUDIO CITY CA 91604 WHEAT RIDGE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 00433 S ALLISON PKWY LAKEWOOD CO 80026 WHEAT RIDGE PARTNERS LLC 01900 GRANT ST #1150 DENVER CO 80203 WHEATRIDGE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH 07530 W 38TH AVE WHEAT RIDGE CO 80033 Cily of7WheatRidge PLANNING COMMISSION Minutes of Meeting May 4, 2017 1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chair OHM at 7:02 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of the Municipal Building, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 2. ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS Commission Members Present:Dirk Boden Alan Bucknam Emery Dorsey Donna Kimsey Janet Leo Scott Ohin Amanda Weaver Vivian Vos Commission Members Absent: Staff Members Present:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer Tammy Odean, Recording Secretary 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. APPROVE ORDER OF THE AGENDA It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner KIMSEY to approve the order of the agenda. Motion carried 8-0. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - March 16, 2017 It was moved by Commissioner DORSEY and seconded by Commissioner VOS to approve the minutes of March 16, 2017, as written. Motion carried 6-0-2 with Commissioners BUCKNAM and WEAVER abstaining. 6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is the time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) Planning Commission Minutes -1- May 4, 2017 No one wished to speak at this time. 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No. MS-16-08: an application filed by Wazee Partners for approval of a minor subdivision to replat the property from 5 parcels to 2 lots for property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) located at the northwest comer of 38th Avenue and Upham Street. Ms. Mikulak gave a short presentation regarding the Minor Subdivision and the application. She entered into the record the contents of the case file, packet materials, the zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations and the contents of the digital presentation. She stated that the public notice and posting requirements have been met, therefore the Planning Commission has jurisdiction to hear this case. Commissioner BUCKNAM asked about the history behind the 1990 dedication right-of-way dedication labeled as an excepted parcel on sheet 4. Mr. Brossman explained that ADA ramps needed to be constructed and that was the reason for the 1990 dedication. He also added that the right-of-way (ROW) on Upham was previously dedicated as a series of ROW and roadway easements, which is similar to a grant of use to construct the road but not an actual conveyance of land. With the dedication on the proposed plat, the property owner will convey the land and ensure they are not paying taxes on that piece of land. Commissioner VOS asked what is meant by the requirement for streetscape improvements and if those designs will be determined now or later in the process. She also asked if those designs are available for public viewing. Ms. Mikulak explained that streetscape improvements typically includes sidewalk, amenity zone, street furnishings, and lights. The design of the streetscape has not yet been approved and will be a part of the civil construction plans. Those plans will be reviewed by the Community Development and Public Works Departments and can be viewed by the public but are not online. Commissioner VOS asked why on-street parking is needed. Ms. Mikulak explained on-street parking is encouraged in the zoning code and viewed as a benefit to this kind of site in a mixed use, walkable area. The market will demand more parking than can be accommodated on site and the ROW dedication width will allow for on-street parking. Commissioner VOS asked for clarification regarding the southbound lanes on Upham at 38th Ave. Planning Commission Minutes -2- May 4, 2017 Ms. Mikulak explained that two southbound lanes would be provided immediately at the intersection: one for turning left and the other as a bypass lane for turning right. It will be striped so drivers know it is not a parking lane. Tyler Downs, Wazee Partners 1255 S. Filmore, Denver Mr. Downs did not have a presentation but offered to answer any questions. Commissioner BODEN asked where the parking garage is going to sit in relation to the storm water detention. Mr. Down stated the garage will be above the storm water detention which is a subterranean vault. Commissioner BUCKNAM wanted to know ifthe hammerhead easement is an access for the parking structure or other purpose. Mr. Downs explained the hammerhead easement is for emergency access and will be adjacent to one of the two entrances forthe parldng garage. Commissioner DORSEY asked if Vectra Bank is going to be relocated and have a drive-thru. Mr. Downs confirmed Vectra Bank is still a part of the project and it will have a drive-thru. Commissioner VOS asked ifthe parking garage will be for public use or just for residential tenants. Mr. Downs explained the parking garage will be for both public and residential parking. A gate within the garage will separate the different parking areas. Britta Fisher, Localworks Ms. Fisher explained she, as well as other Localworks employees, are currently officed in the Vectra Bank building and are strongly in favor ofthis project even though they will be displaced by the new development. She testified that the developers have met with the community and local businesses and have a great revitalization strategy that supports retail in the area. She is very supportive of this project, and retailers in the area are excited to have new residents, which translates to new customers. It was moved by Commissioner BUCKNAM and seconded by Commissioner WEAVER to APPROVE Case No. MS-16-08, a request for approval of a two- lot minor subdivision plat on property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial CMU-C) and located at the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street, for the following reasons: Planning Commission Minutes -3- May 4, 2017 1. All requirements of the subdivision regulations (Article IV) of the zoning and development code have been met. 2. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. With the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall continue to coordinate utility service with the appropriate agencies and any updated information regarding utility easements shall be reflected on the plat prior to recordation. 2. The developer shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with required security prior to recordation of the subdivision plat. Motion passed 8-0. 8. OTHER ITEMS Wheat Ridge · Ward Station - Area Visioning Update Ms. Mikulak gave a brief presentation which summarized the contents of the memo provided in the meeting packet. She explained the history planning in the Northwest Subarea and explained the most recent vision document which was created to help articulate the City's vision for the area and to implement projects resulting from the 2E ballot issue passed in 2016. The City is focused on making sure that 2E investments are spent wisely and leveraged fully. She gave an updated on the G line opening. The Wheat Ridge - Ward Station is the beginning of the G Line and the station is already built. Once the A line technology is fixed, the G line can begin testing and should be opening in 2017. The 2006 subarea plan outlined a vision for mixed use, transit oriented development (TOD) but a little vague. In 2013 the plan was updated to incorporate the finalized station design and to incorporate several planning accomplishments. The goal ofthe 2013 update was not to change the vision for the area, but to refine the City's vision for TOD with an emphasis on employment in the station area. In 2015, the City collaborated with the Urban Land Institute (ULI) to study the area surrounding the rail station. ULI recommended that the City be open-minded in terms of creative and innovative employment based land uses. They recommended building a street grid for good urban design and walkability and encouraged some multifamily development to make the area feel like a neighborhood. The City contracted with WSP/PB in 2016 to refine the vision for the station area. The elements included in the vision are a coworking/maker space, a recreation and regional park, an active public space and linear park, a pedestrian bridge and a "Base Camp" brand that focuses on the outdoor recreation industry. Planning Commission Minutes -4- May 4, 2017 Next steps for implementing the vision and moving forward with public investments include meeting with property owners and developers to identify opportunities for public- private partnership. The Parks Commission is also scheduled to receive an update on the vision document and Investing 4 the Future funds. City Council endorsed the vision in April. Commissioner DORSEY asked if there are development plans for the Jolly Rancher property. Ms. Mikulak stated the current owner is marketing the property for sale and does not intend to develop it themselves. The zoning that is in place will allow for a wide variety of uses, but there are no specific plans yet. She explained the vision plan calls for some flex/coworking space. Commissioner BODEN expressed supported and liked the idea ofthe two ponds being utilized with the recreational activities and wanted to know how the water levels would be sustained. Ms. Mikulak did not know what the water source was and explained that there are many unanswered questions because the lakes are not city owned. Commissioner BODEN also asked about the linear park going south from the station and if it was an existing road or will bisect through buildings. Ms. Mikulak explained that there are a few possible options for the alignment of the linear park including doing improvements to Van Gordon and/or Tabor. As shown in the vision plat it would be a new road and primarily would run adjacent to the Lakemont property line, but should not bisect any buildings. Commissioner BODEN asked if there have been any conversations with property owners to the south of the station. Ms. Mikulak stated there have not been conversations as of yet, but in a couple of weeks they City will hold small group property owner meetings to engage the community. Commissioner BUCKNAM was impressed with the vision for the station area and thought this will be a great gateway for outdoor enthusiasts. His main concern is related to cyclists and a need to ensure connectivity that allows riders to get to the station on their bikes. Ms. Mikulak said this is being actively looked at because the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is close to being adopted. The City is working with Arvada and focusing on infrastructure. Planning Commission Minutes -5- May 4, 2017 Commissioner VOS asked if Arvada has any monetary participation in the Ward Road Station area. Ms. Mikulak explained that a meeting had taken place with Jefferson County, A]vada, and Wheat Ridge to discuss collaboration. There was discussion of a signal at Ward Road and Ridge Road, but financial commitments have not yet been discussed yet. Commissioner LEO asked if there is any connection across the rail other than Tabor Street to the east and Ward Road to the west. Ms. Mikulak confirmed those are the closest access points. Commissioner WEAVER expressed her support for the vision but observed that there are barriers when cycling to the station from the south. She echoed Commissioner BUCKNAM'S comments and encouraged the City to focus on connectivity to improve access to the station area. Commissioner OHM expressed support and stated he was in favor of the pedestrian bridge. He also expressed support for the utilizing the lakes and for the Regional Park concept on the south side of the area. He suggested that sidewalks or paths be planned all the way around the lakes. He also would like to see some ofthe colors reminiscent ofthe Jolly Rancher factory be incorporated into the area. Commissioner OHM asked if the City is thinking about a form-based code for the site. Ms. Mikulak explained that our mixed-use code is similar to a form-based code. The City will be considering if an overlay district is appropriate for the area. Commissioner OHM also said he would like to see food-related uses in this area and maybe some pop-up retail. He expressed excitement for the G Line to get moving and hopes it will revitalize this area of Wheat Ridge. 9. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Commissioner WEAVER and seconded by Commissioner DORSEY to adjourn the meeting at 8:19 p.m. Motion passed 8-0. 11 1 Tammy Odemt Recording Secretary Planning Commission Minutes -6- May 4,2017 City of:gy'- Wheat Ridge CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT TO:Planning Commission CASE MANAGER:Lauren Mikulak DATE OF MEETING: CASE NO. & NAME: ACTION REQUESTED: May 4, 2017 MS-16-08 / West End 38 Request for approval of a two-lot minor subdivision on property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) LOCATION OF REQUEST: Northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street APPLICANT(S):Wazee Partners PROPERTY OWNER(S)Olive Street Development Co LLC and Wadsworth Building Corporation APPROXIMATE AREA:168,825 Square Feet (3.8757 Acres) PRESENT ZONING:Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) PRESENT LAND USE:Bank, vacant structure/land ENTER INTO RECORD: (X) CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS (X) SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS (X) ZONING ORDINANCE (X)DIGITAL PRESENTATION LOCATION MAP MU-C l tz:rf i' MU-14 1 38THAVE 7- Planning Commission 1 Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 L A pANCE Sl All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. L REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval of a minor subdivision that would create two (2) lots and one (1) tract and includes right-of-way dedication on the perimeter of the site. The property is zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) and is located at the northwest corner of W. 3 8th Avenue and Upham Street. The site includes five (5) parcels, only one of which has been previously platted. The purpose of the request is to prepare the site for mixed use redevelopment, including a new building for Vectra Bank and a multistory apartment building with ground floor retail and structured parking. Because of the number ofparcels involved, the plat is being processed as a minor subdivision. Planning Commission will be the final authority for approval of the subdivision. Please note that the property is subject to several related and active applications that are not under consideration by the Planning Commission. These include the following: • Concept Plan - A concept plan for the property has been reviewed by staff. While the site is less than 10 acre in size, this document is required to allow a drive through component for Vectra Bank. • Site Plan - A site plan is currently under review by staff to confirm the proposed development complies with the City's zoning and design standards. • Conditional Use Permit - A conditional use permit is required for the bank's drive through component and has been reviewed by staff. • Redevelopment Agreement - The Urban Renewal Authority and City Council approved a redevelopment agreement in late 2015. While these applications are related to the subdivision, they are not part of the platting request and should not influence the Planning Commission's recommendation on the subdivision. The purpose of the subdivision application is establish property boundaries, access, rights-of-way, easements, and utility service in order to create developable parcels. II. EXISTING CONDITIONS The subject property is located at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street and includes 7323 W. 38th Avenue, 7391 W. 38th Avenue, 3845 Upham Street, and an unaddressed vacant parcel (Exhibit:vifYiftial). The property is zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C), and was part of the City's 2011 legislative rezoning ofthe Wadsworth corridor to MU-C. This zone district encourages medium to high density mixed use development and allows for residential, civic, and a wide range of commercial and retail uses. Properties to the west and north are also zoned MU-C. Properties to the south and east are zoned Mixed-Use Neighborhood (MU-N) and were part of the 2012 city-initiated rezoning of the 38th Avenue corridor *xhibit-2/26*ilik). The surrounding properties include a variety of land uses. Across Upham Street to the east is Stevens Elementary School, a Jefferson County Public School. To the west is Wheat Ridge Marketplace, including the Safeway grocery store and several retail stores and quick serve restaurants. To the north on Upham Street is a multi-story office building and the West Metro Fire Station. To the south, across 38th Avenue is the Chalet restaurant, a day care, several neighborhood-oriented commercial uses. Planning Commission 2 Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 The subject property is 168,825 square feet or 3.8757 acres in size, and it is comprised of five parcels with two owners. The corner property previously included a 1920s single-family home, which had been vacated and was demolished after it became occupied by vagrants. A barn-like structure for auto service is on the north end o f the site and was originally constructed in 1960. The two-story Vectra Bank building was constructed in 1985 and includes the bank and office space. The bank is surrounded by a parking lot, but the remainder of the site is undeveloped land £Exhibit?3#Sitk i?/0/bk). If the subdivision is approved, the applicant intends to scrape and redevelop the site in its entirety. The applicant is serving as the master developer and will be responsible for public improvements including streetscape improvements along the perimeter. III.PROPOSED SUBDIVISION PLAT The proposed subdivision plat is comprised of four sheets 68**42222*3%0*821&22. The cover sheet includes the standards notes and declarations. Sheet 2 is an exhibit which clarifies the legal description. Sheet 3 depicts the existing conditions, and Sheet 4 shows the proposed conditions. The features of the plat are described below. Lot Configuration The subdivision boundary is abnormal in shape, but the proposed lot configuration will result in a more logical layout than exists today and one that will make sense for future development. All existing parcel lines are proposed to be vacated (shown on Sheet 3), and a total of two (2) development lots are proposed to be created (shown on Sheet 4). The MU-C zone district does not include minimum lot size and lot width requirements, but the proposed lots appear to be shaped and sized appropriately to accommodate future development. Lot 1 will accommodate multifamily residential development with ground floor retail, and Lot 2 will accommodate a freestanding building for Vectra Bank. Right-of-Way and Public Improvements When new properties are created through the City's subdivision process, staff reviews adjacent street improvements to confirm that they meet current roadway standards and to confirm that they can accommodate traffic generated by proposed development. A traffic impact study was provided for the entire site, and it projects traffic volumes and turning movements based on the proposed land uses (residential, retail, restaurant, and bank). Based on the traffic study, the development is not expected to have an adverse impact on the local street network, but some roadway improvements will be required. On W. 38th Avenue, improvements will include on-street parking, curb, gutter, and a detached sidewalk of varying widths. There is no change to the lane configuration on 38th Avenue as a result of this project. The curb will be rebuilt but travel lanes will remain in the same location. Sufficient right-of-way (ROW) is being dedicated on the plat to accommodate these streetscape improvements on 38th Avenue. Previously, the 38th Avenue ROW was dedicated by an old Journal of the Commissioners ofJefferson County,which is atypical. The ROW dedication on the plat extends to the centerline o f the street in order to clean up the title of the property and the street. Planning Commission 3 Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 Upham Street will be improved with on-street parking, curb, gutter, and a 6-foot sidewalk. At the intersection with 38th Avenue, the road will be striped to accommodate two southbound turning lanes- a right-turn bypass lane and left-turn lane. The ROW dedication accommodates these new improvements and again extends to the centerline of the street to clean up the title of the property. Because traffic generated on the site is proposed to be distributed to both Upham and Vance (through an access easement) a traffic signal is not currently warranted on Upham Street. The developer will be responsible for installing streetscape improvements, and these obligations will be memorialized in a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) between the City and developer. Staff is recommending a standards condition relative to the requirement for an SIA. Access Tract A is created on Sheet 4 and serves several purposes, including public and emergency access. Tract A will serve as a two-way drive connecting from 38th Avenue to an existing 30-foot ingress/egress easement to the west. The adjacent easement in the Safeway shopping center provides access to the signalized intersection at Vance Street. An emergency access easement is also provided at the northwest corner of Lot 1, consistent with West Metro Fire District requirements. It should be noted that the plat only identifies the location for access easements, but does not identify all proposed access points. Site plan applications will show all access points in relation to proposed buildings. Currently a parking garage is proposed to be located at the north end of Lot 1 and access into the garage would be provided from both the west and east sides of the site. Drainage A drainage report has been reviewed for the entire site. The site slopes to the north where a drainage facility is proposed to be designed as an underground detention system. This kind of design is considerably more expensive, but it allows for more efficient use of land and is becoming more common on the City's primary commercial corridors. The limits of the drainage facility will be contained within the drainage easement shown on north end of Lot 1. Utilities Wheat Ridge is not a full-service city, so the applicant is actively working with utility providers to identify where wet and dry utility service will be located. Utilities will extend into the site directly from the street and through Tract A which is also encumbered with a utility easement. Given that utility coordination is often ongoing through a development process, staffhas recommended a standard condition that any additional utility information that is available prior to recordation of the plat be updated accordingly. IV.AGENCY REFERRALS All affected service agencies were contacted for comment on the subdivision plat regarding the ability to serve the property. The developer will be responsible for any needed upgrades to accommodate the proposed development, and the applicant is in direct contact with the appropriate utility agencies. Specific referral responses follow. Wheat Ridge Public Works: The plat and supporting technical documents have been reviewed and approved. Planning Commission 4 Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 Renewal Wheat Ridge: No conflict with urban renewal plans. West Metro Fire District: Can serve. Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: Coordination is ongoing. Upgrades will likely be required to accommodate new development on this site and elsewhere in this sanitation basin. The scope of those upgrades is being coordinated with the district. Xcel Energy: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing. Century Link: Can serve. Utility coordination is ongoing. Wheat Ridge Water District: No comments provided. Utility coordination is ongoing. Comeast Cable: No comments provided. Utility coordination is ongoing. V. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Staff concludes that the proposed minor subdivision plat is compliant with the MU-C zone district regulations and results in a logical lot layout for the proposed future development. Staff further concludes that the subdivision plat complies with the standards in Article IV (subdivision regulations) of the zoning and development code and that all utility agencies can serve the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. For these reasons, Staff recommends approval of the plat with the conditions listed below. V. SUGGESTED MOTIONS Option A: "I move to APPROVE of Case No. MS-16-08, a request for approval of a two-lot minor subdivision plat on property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) and located at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street, for the following reasons: 1. All requirements of the subdivision regulations (Article IV) of the zoning and development code have been met. 2. All agencies can provide services to the property with improvements installed at the developer's expense. With the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall continue to coordinate utility service with the appropriate agencies and any updated information regarding utility easements shall be reflected on the plat prior to recordation. 2. The developer shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with required security prior to recordation of the subdivision plat. Planning Commission 5 Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 Option B: "I move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. MS-16-08, a request for approval of a two-lot minor subdivision plat on property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) and located at the northwest corner ofW. 38th Avenue and Upham Street, for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3, " Planning Commission 6 Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 EXHIBIT 1: AERIAL The subject property is located at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street and is highlighted in blue below. 6 r 37TH PL ..A.. 37TH eL Z .-1...1-1 Z N Planning Commission Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 EXHIBIT 2: ZONING MAP 5 37TH P L-- r F t 1 Suf . K N Planning Commission Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 DO EXHIBIT 3: SITE PHOTOS View of the site from Upham looking west. View o f the site from 38th Avenue looking north Planning Commission Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 1 EXHIBIT 4: PROPOSED PLAT [see attached] Planning Commission 10 Case No. MS-16-08 / West End 38 01/02/2018 I LSM I MS-16-08 / West End 38 r *i 5ATEY2rv 3GTH AVE Request for approval of minor subdivision for property zoned Mixed Use-Commercial CMU-C) at the northwest corner of 38th Ave and Upham St Planning Commission | May 4,2017 6 **Pili 38' 1 AVE ' 1 .,1. 11 1,3.-1 6.-kJA 5- 53-23: t€%;46 t Vt J.: Zoning Map Looking northwest from 38th Avenue 1 01/02/2018 Subdivision 101 Reconfiguration of lots, tracts, or parcels for sale or development Does: · Removes, creates, or defines property lines · Allows city to evaluate ROW · Allows city to evaluate civil docs (traffic, drainage) Does not: · No change to the zoning • No change to permitted uses • Does not look at site design or building placement Looking north along Upham Street „ WEST END 38 FILING NO. 1 .=rt- 4 PAR[IL OF .MO .,40,-71.·.st·.1''-:itN .r.L:-Zk.'-" -a. = -- .p-n,- T-£ST-E4·#Rl*2.:2&2.··- " - 23 17•rr or -T *11. Cr• I -mi/-41 rm of =AT'Mf;&& :66%'5*...0-0..4, ...Ii•, i.,me A:-QUARTER SECnON BRE&,DOWN ....'.a..Ft.NAL PlAT Um-:.U=-el.==-- 21#415190M,0= 221£:asa:Er...--= 2/2//Nikioor¢wik 27.-3&F39.--9EUE€ft *32222 E%11,£0221 6532*P'EigEM -- -- .... 14· E-1---.31=3 -1.--- 1 -2* 1 .===: Si€Ei*.31*314;WEIF'# lilli ....1 -11149 y .022.- - - ' 10.......-Iti- 5111...2 Fr#23£.g ----. 1.-(-../& .FFiegaEiEXE=: - idm,ket....f .0 d .,A i E#././.-I........=7/I 19· .. - E 11 1 1 1 ,·9:"tnu - 29ty" - 1=: AAU*QUE *i• -2. .7// I...% --1 - Sheet One Sheet Two -dk. . I -i 01/02/2018 WEST END 38 FILING NO. 1 I P.CEL IF UN, = ../ SO,-MI .. O../ SOU™,T ....m OF THI SDI=.Alm O.CTION .S . p-0 - - ™ ter..EHL illf'11;10,9 „Fl,1 -M E- 23 Y M -,4. m.,/1 /01'•in or v,asal. ./1* Or loumen. .... PLA' EXISTING CONDITIONS m EXEr[NG CINDI'rIONS . •'MU•.r. - 7•PE •·-.-.,-7- / 4 -W.... 1 ·i.:r.· /3 11 -Err . 0, i F-*NAL PLAT _1 li:I ; , \ .....t. 7/1---'MI ...0,1 111 rmital i uln,tul.i9 .Zt K =7 -9/14-·- I & re- -/11 -h -- 4/ 4111 --·' · --1. E.»''' -4,-- 1_4 23,4 7"2 -2, 1 ECE:Eae-- T-*r-7 ---......4:U=..... IP.-EWEED.- \90#15- Sheet Three Sheet Three .NAL /1-Ar L <il Lka- i dr -----, pr FEE.7 = ty 1 1 1 WEST END 38 FILING NO. 1 -1 62 L.1 tor.sm, 1 4,ot-™. Iw,GE ... . ™E ...-t,ral •in*.. CT= Of ,11,47 -,GA CO.I,n Or .,r™,0/. ,TATE 0. CO!,UD(1 49 3,7 ./. - 2 U™ ./1. 1 rEAC .-PROPO·SED .NDIT/ONS 1 2 Ln - 1 - m.-%¥- ij1 -1.-I---r *__-Ckl--- £a 921 Ild'. L. N» / 25.. i 1/;Ir -- 4 '-7 *1 i - AVA' · ••En- ' eE 2-2» 238 . -1.- .AZTECR?« "' iff-..94- -4-- .... ... =/ «re*·3; 3· . . :... il 1 ......1 ;i 1-1 .. 1.t!. J al-- ...1 1 -4 1 .- -, L- J ... ' Sheet Four Sheet Four 2 01/02/2018 i' W.N *11 4 1 1 111 AL I_1111 L :li t*1 =7 .q dil Ary. ==/] .-I- ---I --I...............- Sheet Four Sheet Four 4'\ »3#i rSE,- 2. .-%2 ; 33 TE. 22£ i 4-:j .r ·:5 -i - AAE . '' kil* = 1 22.22 , 7 I r.... -•. I , /1 . 1 ff«-- r li 141 I_- i- 1 25,6- i -3 I ./ Sheet Four Sheet Four A 01/02/2018 Referral Staff Recommendation Public Works Plat has been approved Urban Renewal No conflict with urban renewal plan West Metro Fire Can serve WR Sanitation Ongoing coordini WR Water No comments Xcel Energy Can serve Century Link Can serve itiOn Staff concludes: ..%1 - All agencies can serve the property - All requirements of Article IV (subdivision regulations) have been met Staff recommends APPROVAL with conditions: - SIA required before recordation - Continue coordination with utilities Q Misc Lauren Mikulak From:Chris Downs <chris@cdownslaw.com> Sent:Tuesday, May 3,2016 11:06 AM To:Lauren Mikulak; Kenneth Johnstone CC:tdowns@wazeepartners.com Subject:RE: WestEnd 38th--Access This is very helpful. Thanks a bunch. From: Lauren Mikulak [mailto:Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.usl Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 10:32 AM To: Chris Downs; Kenneth Johnstone Cc: tdowns@wazeepartners.com Subject: RE: WestEnd 38th--Access Chris, We've looked at the WR Marketplace plat, and it is our opinion that the plat note confirms that the ingress-egress easement along the east boundary of the subdivision is intended to benefit the Vectra Bank property. It appears that this access point can be modified with the approval of the City and property owner, and approval of any modification cannot be unreasonably withheld. The City can approve a change upon receipt of additional information regarding the new location. Details related to easement improvement, construction periods, etc should be mutually agreed upon with the adjacent property owner. Right-of-way permits are not required for work on private property and flat work is not subject to building permit review. The Public Works Department may be able to provide standard specifications for asphalt, curbs, etc if needed. While the subject easement is for general public use, the dedicatory language on the plat does not elevate the easement to the point of being public right-of-way. The City has an interest in preserving public use, but is not responsible for maintenance. Regarding the Park and Shop subdivision, the case file is on microfilm, and I have attached the relevant documents (excluding a lengthy drainage report and public noticing). If you want to review those additional documents you'll can schedule a time to use the film reader in our office. It appears that the subdivision application did not originally extend all the way to 38th Avenue, but the boundary was modified prior to City Council approval in 1979. I cannot find any files on the 1 St amendment of the Park and Shop plat. Our land use database identifies the City as the applicant, and the plat does not appear in the meeting minutes for the PC/CC dates listed in the signature blocks. The only change appears to be the easement that is currently located on the west side of Chase Bank, so it may have been an administrative amendment, but I can't find any documentation to confirm this. Let me know if you have any additional questions. Thanks, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2845 Cil# 4 ,:c, W heal 1 2 ic ic ye-*-Cit, v ul I N 1 1, 1 11 VE IA)1'MEN b 1 From: Chris Downs [mailto:chris@cdownslaw.com] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2016 4:41 PM To: Lauren Mikulak; Kenneth Johnstone Cc: tdowns@wazeepartners.com Subject: RE: WestEnd 38th--Access Lauren, Thanks for the lead to the Wheat Ridge Marketplace files. Can you also provide a lead to the Park and Shop initial subdivision and the later First Amendment to that subdivision? Thanks. Chris From: Lauren Mikulak [mailto:Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Friday, April 29, 2016 8:55 AM To: Chris Downs; Kenneth Johnstone Cc: tdowns@wazeepartners.com Subject: RE: WestEnd 38th--Access Chris, We'll look at this and get back with you next week. In the meantime, I did flip through the case file, and unfortunately there are virtually no notes on the easement. The plat was processed at the same time as the site plan, and the two case files are online. Use the attached directions to navigate to cases WSP-94-1 and WS-95-1. Thank you, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2845 . 0 . (iti „1( 110/ heat Iliclae -ClMMUNIn DIVE»p•,INI From: Chris Downs [mailto:chris@cdownslaw.coml Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2016 2:39 PM To: Kenneth Johnstone; Lauren Mikulak Cc: tdowns@wazeepartners.com Subject: WestEnd 38th--Access Ken and Lauren, Please see the attached memo requesting your take on our proposed use of the ingress and egress easements within the WR Market Place to provide a secondary access point to our proposed structured parking improvement for the WestEnd 38h project. The point of access to the easements is shown. Separately, 1 would like to review the WR Market Place file documentation with respect to the December 1995 City approval of the First Filing subdivision Plat. It may help me to better understand the scope of the adjacent property owner rights to access the 30' easements. Should I make a formal request (FOIA or otherwise)? 2 WAZEE PARTNERS, LLC 2300 15th Street, Suite 325 Denver, CO 80202 (720) 420-1565 L MEMORANDUM TO:Ken Johnstone; Lauren Mikulak FROM:Chris Downs; Tyler Downs DATE:April 28, 2016 RE:Adjacent Property Use of Ingress-Egress Easement - Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision Ken and Lauren: Olive Street Development Co., LLC, an affiliate of Wazee Partners, LLC (hereinafter "Olive Development"),owns land adjacent to the Wheat Ridge Market Place. Separately, we are finalizing our purchase contract with Vectra Bank for the bank land adjoining our parcel. Olive Development, as an adjacent land owner, how desires to confirm its access rights over the 30' ingress-egress easement dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge and to the public pursuant to the Dedication Certificate on the face of the subdivision plat for the Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision, First Filing, made December 7, 1995. We have attached a depiction ofthe 30' ingress-egress easement and the proposed point of access. The Dedication Certificate specifically provides that the easement dedication is to ". . . the City of Wheat Ridge and the public, streets, roads and avenues and drives as shown on the accompanying plat for the public use forever." Separately, Note 4 to the Plat states: "Those areas indicated as "Ingress-Egress Easement" shall also allow for general public access and adjacent property access through the Subdivision within said designated easements, at mutually agreed upon access points." As the owner ofthis ingress- egress easement, we would like the City to "mutually agree" with Olive Development that our proposed access point, for pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress, is an acceptable one. g:\2093 - 38th & upham purchase\001 -west end 38\plat\johnstone mikulek memo re ingn Please note that the 30' ingress-egress easement has both (i) a 30' ingress-egress easement bordering the adjacent parcel, and (ii) a diagonal easement depiction which overlaps. I suspect the diagonal easement was put in place to aid in delivery truck access. We propose using either, or both. It is our intent to provide a structural garage access point at this location. Separately, we would like to have these public rights of way re-surfaced so as to better accommodate vehicle traffic to and from our proposed parking structure. Please advise us regarding the City requirements for easement improvement, construction period access to the easement area, and any other City review and approval requirements. 2 Lauren Mikulak From: Sent: To: CC: Subject: Attachments: Chris Downs <chris@cdownslaw.com> Thursday, April 28, 2016 2:39 PM Kenneth Johnstone; Lauren Mikulak tdowns@wazeepartners.com WestEnd 38th--Access CCF04282016_00003.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Ken and Lauren, Please see the attached memo requesting your take on our proposed use of the ingress and egress easements within the WR Market Place to provide a secondary access point to our proposed structured parking improvement for the WestEnd 38th project. The point of access to the easements is shown. Separately, 1 would like to review the WR Market Place file documentation with respect to the December 1995 City approval of the First Filing subdivision Plat. It may help me to better understand the scope of the adjacent property owner rights to access the 30' easements. Should I make a formal request (FOIA or otherwise)? Chris A (,U/Fl +-AM--3 Chris Downs Downs Law Firm LLC 230015th Street, Suite 325 Denver, CO 80202 chris@cdownslaw.com (720) 420-1565 Fax: (877) 444-1877 4 429 mit, 44714 04/UA-01* uk/66(/9 »194 */ k,2/GO lj w ..R 1/2.69*- 9 04 A-(£,1, + FAher-W AA£14' £42 £439 - fvist FC, e.r\At -> f«) Ala«El"Q/013>3.Qu *492 dRA© e»· · + f FIBA/,· r,t €431,0 "UB(i/k 1 i-PI,156/7 34-5-95-/b.'ab R.Il f,61-lf 1 ).##AK .thh, '6 FAU,1#122/ 5- WEEAT ED@[E MA®KE[PLACE 88©0¥080©NI' FO®ST [ .ght.of-A Resubdivision of PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDMENT and heeption City of a. Subdivision of a part of the Southeast One-quarter of of gaid =09 ls.Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M. City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado SE Cor !21/4 JSec. 23, 13S, R69W -t.4 br ZONE R-3 SHEET 1 OF 2 Fd- 3-1/4 CO.W. (S84104805) • 4 their ZONE R-C Monument #13212 ea,ement all al,o rolr accele NOT SUBDIVIDED ents. It 11 SOO-1 1'371 721.65' 606.65 ---' - 115 00' -E- 7 : 2--gA.=s1i. u,2.....,v.F"'E. 90.- 7-7--1 L WATO1*i =3= 6 f. R -130-0 1. ...."19/lrf/:Be,i// -, 1\ 3, 3 r 0= m , 5 0 1 i \..0./=IT.£S. 7¤9Me? 4 -l.=0=- 4 *Na.»0 288= • O ..1 S DED<* /1'31-L fNOO•21'377, 212.30' !trw, -1 , I /%2171£ 1/04 07/70*Mit--7--#=21/7.1 71 Nont/71 17020 LOT 5 4 (5.847 ack) ' 25- B L 0 C K -,=L-=,A. 1 63£ '2'S8< (1.4 1,9 10.00'..1 ---- \(1.117-aa)- MOO-21-27-W, / ,1,4..3.-10.-r LOT 6 1184'*i WHEAT.RIDGE , .WARKEgA«#k>-7-t\-725*SUBD-IVISIONkl co.524 1 :32-: 1 1:P ela SIGN,# A 1 A I, UJ1 ---0-4 -MHerGOR kirtnrE- -j'1' 03*0 ·.A 4,-90. 22 e-- FILING--c. .\,6\ FIRST - -- 8 IOLA -· 1,0=1 ZONE C-1 /1.-Gg<-NEr. 13&315 Soo·- 13 _£ 30' INGREES-e;REm 12-50'04zg:€-ur-**_ 90•21'37=E 424.24' 'i '1 17 =1-1:,1-2:-mLM-1 <,= -,-SI1300-11'37'E. 245.83 *100•21'37t. 141-99' .. i 0-, ij387.82' S .11 ---- 00 - 9. 1 51 8 (0.574 ac.&) 1, 11 1100'21'3711. 45Uy its'151 ,--4[IMA,O 1211 · [,1 .,30' FOmERLY BLOCK 1 P,•c Aan, 9HOP St]BDIVISION \5 1, C , !C DEICATED LOT 3 EIRsT 91/ 'c 1 1 Ed =69 (1.019 ac.*) =- -NI'/ 10-10'121 387.82'00·10'127. 303.44 · SOO·10'lf'£ 186.55' /" 40,<}Noo·10'12·w, 13147/ L. 1 1' DalED- THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE (0.472' a.=1100'11'41'E, 1027.83' NOO'10'12W, 1027.80'PmeJRTD I NOO-10'12W, 2615.05' (Not to Scale)d. ial,· b - -West Une SE1/4 WADSWORTH BOULEVARD (SH 121)Sec.23. 13S, RGBW SW Cor. SET/4 Sec.2312'0*' scm,=02' S CEer=teZE -GRAPHIC SCALE Fd· 3-1/3 C.O.W. 1= = 60 Monument I, Eugene A. Burdick. a Registered professidnal bgineer andProfeosional Land Surveyor registered in the State of Colorado. dohereby certify that the 21:vey of the bowidlary bil HECIAT . RIDGH Z--/4-'-1-1 EURIST PLACE SUBDIVISION. Fllksr 2101.ING. was =ade under * direct resp=/ibility, gupervisian, and checking. and in -cocrdance with AREA = 13.537 ac- =h all applicable Colorado Statutee, current reviged edition, as; amended.CLERI AND 91;CORDER' S CZ217¤,ramE S @E i P. e 'A 9 1 £9 'E,,f.6N St JU2.S 21'37*E ZE|2 SE2-47 1;91 j 11 GE at e·--' 142-85' 45' N RE£0&£llit i5Lrilf&*SKEEd For and.on b-hal€ 02 · -1 BURDICK ENGINEERING CONSOLZANTS State of Color/de ) ) SS County of Jefferson ) I hereby certify that thia .plat wae fo' clock _L.I. on this 99 day of116*' recorded in Plan File #/2 iled· in ay 1=,1 e 14. 84=lick.iWEi -.....ug. I ado lag. No. 9910 y By ,&,0-,-0 8•AP i -. Deputy ·+4:·E-lk,4204: ... f 500"10'14-W. 326 17'- 16· : 1 4• 233.61'•hpic· 0· Tr,i- P-i n' ,f H p' (21 0 14 'C Z...0 0 b .84 4• 8 - 3/·- r. 1 6 17. ,- I 56. . '.C-- SCI 56-•1-aw . I ·p -r . .1 b i , ··U MARKET PLA-F SURD!VISA 1 ->C •k f ·VE C TRA RANK 1 PA PK ING APE Ab "1 / .M -I 1.A , - :, · p ·1 0...C 4 'S '2 35'007 7·3 *1 S1,/ 4 - oWN Kk614 485.O06?1 v ·25 0 '... t 'F' 16 /' / SOO'11'401, 306.14'7. 7341MS. . A G ,»3 ..a WHEAT RIDC F MAR FF' P 4% A- v 1/1.2.4 D.4 FIEss-ARES€ 1 j'-45¥1 *0 3.31 3-2-- 3 V. \4.21%3(N. 4 . 0 · 28 00'· I NOO'DO'80-E. 233-51 C- % 7. '/'30E -5 Manag:ng Pa"--7 50 x ? *---- -Crq©JO.:ACKNOWLEDGEMEWT ' 55 57 441 4 0BLOCK ;%-4®3% , R .4 4.AS.9 /697' -43i:v r .- .9 3,-0 8 .830'5C %36 9 Dregolng 1-'5' I 1,7 I N \4.,(1 718 oc.3-)...<......1.da., 'f 5'531 LOT 7 '56/' ' \« 572 15'00-wit;.0 38.60 1- 9 - r I !/1-tner.:,-P6,14. 6 36 1 -(0989 cc t)9-'2 wi•n-ss my hand .nd $...it 20.• ie *gvJT:.,7 -37- - € •CXS«.c•,-SS iA.'v' i. ./LAT #3Jr. 1, 11 -*5*.307 r.47 -or,r,195:on -*71·-5 85. \ /98 he , / 1 LOT 6 Q 4 X C 0 64 9837' 3 bl. 63 R• C V C % 490'OC'ot 650\ 7 =E, 215 76'2 1.10 p 34 2. 132 47'2 •2 Ce p 36 5 LOT 1 'M-00,00.06N 1AV H.1.Af 1S3M 1 56' -- APPROVED - -I ,NOO-00'001 13047' Publ : r Se :7: 0-- 7 omp . * li . U 2 Wes • C ommun i - 2 t 9 0.574-34. f) 2T- 3- 1 LOT 2 0 02 v of Wh•.* P:dg-0 F 4 2% ;*C . S. · - -- 49€ AU SAOP V NO·' SUB[YVISPON \-1. AMENDVENT 47.-2 0 3 E WPle ,-I AS; V· % ·3« 092 304 7 7 0 - CAT.D -2 --£ 7 R DG·PLAI 721.69' P/L 15.1 4 + :r ; 11*.'r BR. J17 8$· H Reo.+FD/5-7 BURDICK ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED £--A=='%-WITIEAT ®UDGE IAWAIRKIEr[PLA©E 8(DI@DO¥080©[Mg ED®87 [FOLONI@ Lak,Amed CO :0227-2401 92272 A Resubdivision of PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDMENT and a Subdivision of a part of the Southeast One-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M. City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado 5809 r SHEET 2 OF 2 SE Cor SE1/4 - Sec. 23. T3S. R69W (24104805) Fd. 3-1/4* C.O.W. ZONE R-3 Monument #13212 ZONE R-C NOT SUBDIVIDED S0011'37"E, 721.65' C b 01 co r Z g Z .99.491 ZONE PCD _ .18'£1 1 7A.ft.8£ 0SOO'11'37'E . 408.07 1 223.58' L 19 South line SE 1/4 -Sec.23, Ta R69W LOT 6 C (1.717 ca.*)NOO'21'37'W. 212.30' 0 SOO'10'12"E, 297.65'9.0 288.05' '\ r 8.50'DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE THIS PLAT) NOO'21 37,4 233.51 ----czz===- 0.060 ac.* LOT 5 i_589·38'23"W, 251.10'(5.847 ac.*)BLOCK .5- . NOO'21'37™; 10.00' <rtifi 1 UNCR>LOT 7 .j $ < WHEAT RIDGE MARKETPLACE 9 SUBDIVISIC (0.989 ac.*)2„ b 19 00100 ,18 p. '9 LOT 4 -•X (1.776-2*)1 FIRST FILING NOO'21'37'W,RECG N 6.20.» O 8 &!F S00·21'37E. 1650 SOO'21'37-E, ZONE C-1 ,LQI.1 b K/-6.20' -ls#f NOO'21'377,130.38'S00·21'37'E 132.47'S89'38'23"W, 17.50' 12.50'-SOO'21'3718.50' 4 LOI_1 21 589'38'23"W, S00-21'371 245.83'4 N00,1'37 141.98'357.81 ;(0.5N-36.*)189.80' LOT 2- 43(0.958 ac.*) u LOT 3 FORMERLY BLOCK 1 P AND SHOP SUBDIVISION DE[ ICATED TO THE A CITY OF WHEAT (1.0190G.*)FIRE , AMENDMENT F /, RIDGE (0.125 oc.*) r // (BY ™IS PLAO SOO•10'121 387.81 NOO'10'12W. 303.46' SOO'10'12'E. 186.55'NOO'10'127, 132.47'75 NW Cor. SE1/4Sec. 23, TJS. 869W ' 1010.32'NOO'11'41% 1027.83' > JS86022644)20' DEDICATED TO T)€ CITY OFF WHEAT RIDGE (0.472 ce.30 (ey this PIct) / Fd. 3-1/4 C.O.W. Monument #13212 NOO'10'12, 1627.80' . « 9 5709 d 4709 4%NOO-10'12W. 2645.05' (Not to Scate) - West Rne SE1/4 WADSWOR™ BOULEVARD (SH 121)1%4041=/F,1Sec.23, TJS, R69W s,1 90.,'"'r GRAPHIC SCALE (S84104804)Fd. 3-1/3' C.O.W. f= 61 Monument ·slf WHIEAT [RO[@@E1MIAFKE11'PLACME SUIBIOn¥[180©INI A Resubdivlon of PARK AND SHOP *OR SUBOMSION FIRST AMENOMENT anda Subdivision of a part of th• Southeast One-quarter of Section 23. Townihip 3 South. Range 69 Weet of the 6th P.M.C;ty of Wheat Ride• County of Jeffer•on, State of Colorodo NOT SUBDiVIDED SOO'10'14'* 721.69' PA. .:052 a Ir-,3/-.sr .4 4. - 7- t./. 1 1. . 4-„.4 t ;/ li -WA / // I .. 1-.: E'FEEFEE&:2399%013 --.1- I. .../...... .1 ....... .... . ...... / N..' . I. 1-/t- a t./ 0-t.-' C- ...« '1 -/tl- .D -.I ' S-1/ ... .. -t . th- 4h .1..' -*---It.,1 ........ .... '...:,C....1- -re I.t.-1/: Ii...-.. •I'le. ./.• /1./. •- I./th .ta. at ./1. .1 w. 1 i. ·0 ·-· I.-5.¢.I:..1.1.ia •- v•.th:i-•: -J ..4./.• .-e. ......1 , I. 'll -h' Ill'..„„...t... ...... ./th 'I. -/. tt- 11 ./.4 ..'-' 0-·-.•I • =/4.-4 'St*»/ p .I I&1 -I'-' I .n :I »El I /1.4 Sa...... -,-t..t 9 · .t . .... lucE S-1'11/t- r••S Pt-1// I I ..• I. . ..... ... .....,1 . .... m -I- : , .-1 R Sil 4 m -b 0 0-11.«306.14 t ................ *1* I -sce , ... . 1-4 r. L.f \ i= .r f:*1 --ig: r-ell I I Ni,'· t-- i r„-,-•sh.,=7 4 ..ip € .....4--t-'I.* .. . '-.0'1. IW-p. ../IL.A.'/...12 4 ·1,6..A,t itifj..S 2 0 1 0.4.91 E. 5..........0211 BLOCK LOT 4 i8FEED- .... .: ...2 21-J k ,liu. .1.1 -al. .Ue. . 2.-/I' - 2 1.1 ....r., ----'. \ .9 1.* €44$416,-140&5 , g ' / fB P * £ -ritif:> .te....D,1-9 *f hte -,kS .Al .1 .AWAL " ted .fv.4 3,.2- Ii.4 ,nit•-*- 1 .:4• •• + 1 7.:Ir &211 r 146.*... ' I-RL=¤.D-- PLA- -- .--0FO¥Uall PAIUAND-OP-DRUD-ION DED--C -2 --€4,4 4 ti,;1A;*----.-1... -m.... % i 4/114,1 »11/....., =Il-' 1 .....2-„t- I . ... . ........ LOT 6 HLE LS]m W-f N00*11'411 1027.Or S . 1, 1. t. 1-•-af, t* - nt, it -.4- 7*.,te*- . -t.-WAOSIORTH BOULEVA (SH 121) .11/ ht. -. * - t. *a, a 1 .-. A .........1.4.............1 4- d 1,1.< 515 .., 1 ht,... )-./--* e-'./Cm. ,4.-1 5,1**I ==22*ZZ 12.=6=437*:.t:- -* -rtif, --t tk I. -* :%1-1 *8 - .he-c.-a - I - t.il __ .. .im- CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 22, 1994 3 Katie Press, representing Safeway Stores, was sworn in by the Mayor and answered questions. John Minshall, 3550 Miller Court, was sworn in by the Mayor; he owns an apartment building close to the proposed atore and questioned delivery hours. Motion by Mr. Siler to approve the front yard setback variance request to allow the McDonald's building a 33.5 foot setback where 50 feet is required by Code.The criteria used to justify such a variance generally support this request; seconded by Mr. Solano; carried 8-0. Motion by Mr. Siler for approval of the site redevelopment plan as submitted because it complies with all zoning requirements and it is substantially in conformance with the Wheat Ridge Comprehensive Plan and Urban Renewal Plan for this area.The following stipulations apply to this approval: 1.Staff is authorized to work with the owner and developers to resolve the design issues raised by staff in Section III of the staff report in order to achieve design unification throughout this development. 2.Staff is authorized to allow, minor changes and variations from the site plan at time of building permit approval, provided that no such changes or variations reduce a_ development standard below the minimum requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 3.Staff is authorized to work with the owners and affected agencies to finalize the replat of the Park N Shop Subdivision and cause such plat to be recorded.This assumes that deeds for dedications of ROW for West 38th Avenue and Wadsworth Blvd., will be submitted to Council for acceptance prior to recording of said plat; seconded by Mr. Eafanti;.carried 8-0. Item 3.A. Council Bill 66 - An Ordinance providing for the approval of rezoning from Agricultural-One (A-1) and Residential-Two (R-2) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and for approval of an outline development plan on land located at 11200 West 44th Avenue, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado.(Case No. WZ-94-5) Council Bill 66 was introduced by Mr. Hall on second reading; title read by the Clerk; Ordinance No. 976 assigned. Mr. Gidley presented the staff report. He also submitted copies of a letter received this afternoon from Patricia Dwyer, who had asked that this be read into the record.Motion by Mr. Edwards to have this letter read in full into the record; seconded by Mrs. Worth; carried 7-1 with Mr. Solano voting no. / CITY-COUNCIL MINUTES: AUGUST 22, 1994 · 2 Rav Bontin presented a petition to restrict- the alley behind theApplewood Village Shopping Center, lying between 32nd and 38thAvenue and east of Youngfield, to one way traffic going north,and only for trucks and vehicles making deliveries to stores thathave access to the alley.That the alley be closed to thrutraffic and appropriate signs posted. --It is further petitionedthat 35th Avenue be closed where it intersects the alley to theShopping Center, and that Wright Street between 38th and 35thAvenue be restricted to all truck traffic over 7,000 pounds. LOCAL--LIQUOR LICENSING AUTHORITY MATTERS Item 1.Transfer of Owner&;hip for Chili' s Hamburger Grill &Bar, 3240 Youngfield Street, Wheat Ridge. Motion by Mrs. Behm to approve the Transfer of Ownership fromBrinker International, Inc., dba Chili's Hamburger Grill & Bar,3240 Youngfield Street,„Wheat Ridge, to Brinker RestaurantCorporation; seconded by Mr.-Eafanti; carried 8-0. - PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND' READING Item 2.An.Application to consider a request by Lee Ambrose forapproval of a.site plan with variances forredevelopment of a 13-acre Commercial-One zonedproperty located within the Wheat Ridge Town Center -Urban Renewal District.The property is located at thenortheast corner of Wadsworth Blvd. and West 38th Avenue. 02&4*143 .-=NSF--9*133 Case-No. WSP-94-1 whS introduced by Mr. Siler; title read by theClerk. Glen Gidley was sworn in.by the Mayor and presented the staffreport. Ann Pitinga, Director of- _EDARC, was sworn in by the Mayor andanswered Councils' questions. Dennis Wvatt, 1865 South Pearl, Denver, Project Architect,,wassworn ih by the Mayor; explained about all the work that had goneinto designing this project and all the work yet ahead; hopesthat Safeway will be open in the Fall of 1995. Suttie Jones, representing McDonalds Corporation, was sworn in bythe Mayor; they hope to brake ground in January 95; they have notyet made up their minds regarding the playground. 4 1 L 2. 5l 6. T R€VISIONS: NO: DATE; CES EXH[B 1 fi IT F AFFA*IMATE BUIDDE LOCATINS -i li \ i LOT 3 69,373 SF 1 AT / 6 1 E -r LOT 5 63.376 SF - PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT J L FR,OSa) ACCESS EASeeIT LOT 1 68,980 SF 241.13 SF LOT 6 71,490 SF 1 .__in LOT 2 34.043 SF 8-RGER KAK; toiBaiLED , L 29 Raw. [ENCATION ---- -- -- ---I-I'--- i--- Z. TENTATIVE PLAT PREPAMED WInnfl EBEFIT 0, l,FOATED SlmEY REPLAT 8ASED U'01 BOUORY OF EXISTLNG ·P,a< & 9{P SUBDIVE,IC»11 PROPOSED trNAL LOTS ARE PREIMMARY PeONG FINAL SUNEY OCCUENTS. PARCEL AREAS DOWN ARE PREIJMINARY FRCPOSED ACCESS EA9·ENTS ALIGN WITH PAIN,13 LOT WOUT 90'AN 01 [¥FICIAL CEVELOPFENT FUNt ALL EXISTE•,3 NO FROPOSED Ull[17 EASEMENTS WU EE VACATED ANA CEDICATED BY SEPARATEE 00(U€NTS lrON CE•fUETION CF FINDi. SITEWOrd< De€ER»O. NO) attll}ING FEIWTS WILL BE ISSUED l}frIL FEC]ATION OF SLBOWISION REAAT NO EA»ENT RECOFOATIC,1 : 11'#Nllf'Alrl¥# - 08=11[*100¥0200% ikIMPLAY - VOWN %@MTMA FLAEA m. 38704 AMO WAMmwi/70 1. - 50'-0. DATS OR/8*2 at-£¥ED: scan JOB NO¢DU SIEIT NCI T™TATIVE FEEPLAT 6 1 I'•/ APPROVAL CERTIFICAlES 1,15 ,FF,Cg. te•U,lerr B.,0 1, --1, F k err, 1, *Wi Wm WEAT;UDGE FUNI,0 CD,USSOL *ifiCAE ITIES - 0*r cr _ , E_ MEATRIJOE OTY CIUU• AFf°02) 114 - RY FF_ MINCRD ATTESr, CLSK & 11*OF[*Ft tles - o,Y CF - 8- am< & FEKO<82, MEATROJE WAING CB/RIMENr• AM,IC,TED hus - 01'f IE__. 8_. ofer{R F FLA»•a ID MT= 00PRS.IMIIWrf LADSCAPE PLAN NOTES: ' - ! o..8=Al:. ¤ii¥mLO,MImmDlf FLAN 1 7.1/1,1 &.,116 2 0/8/% galm»1 1 0 M.N, 15 ma,IWL UUE™,1- /10,a,-AS : FIEL#414,7 CEVELOP,ell[ [rAI ,/09/,L 1 FNIL U-WE IUN TO ®E ImIWIED 11- 10 mEANICE 'ER NOG©,FE M,WID/*5 W A iMme *9£.E 1 -rn„,=.EUC**1.08/8L_1 1.0000,6 M.NmID NEAS TO le *#TED m NI '' SNIP,JAY -Impo,E 21)00 FMMT£ WMATOL SYSTEDLL FWL M.*trle ,%,lm•LS tne26 & 8,1ms, To E DETE-E) ATTD€ CF FWL WIOSCAPE M.li 05,113 IE,Al. W ...1 3 112,4 ETAL ¥..0 e 1 5. AUL LM:*WE MN, To *Er Cl; CllY Crn*#Ram• ' ; ELOCIanTER YEED 1.56 0m..4 Ome 30]0 0 · b.m,VIDS SNG 11 • 120 R.AnNO IMST,O 9-R K»13 2310 17 t 'TO™- I.FA .1.0. VICINITY MAP sou•r-=co· 1Ufeliti/.*-IP#:1&:&OQ» sy. 1,62/55&-a'VIOMUL lor,L l/%/SC,FE WEA - C.*Zl W .U EXISTING MATI-FAMILY -----"'nr I =* · -y '1· •lt··1, 4,- .1,·.k=.2 ·lt .I,· .* r-r...=u..J>\ i i-f \UE i . =IN; RAIMUS EXISTING VECTRA BAN<EXISTING FACI.EY OIL- 2 4 n ,.-R 1 45#>A--3\ SIOWLIZED c575 .-----/...CSCKDw-wJ, 144, -1- .kill1111111111!111 N /-=M ---- i...·.2 1=30f- Fl·14, 811 j 1 1 167'F \, VKIED . ./ .00®USTER t 0 J liE V yp24 1IU. -f-A/,Ah/,/ / '/X/. '/X/. /A/A //4/\ SA: __Lly-L_- 1-1-4 1 ' f r-1,111111illillilll n <: Z.1. STJ PNKN) toT 11•(t DETAL -W' lul. ./. N.. m--0,-9-*Ue: IR1 CITY PARK DGSTDO IETAL -135 . illill 1413 ,/v//A/\1'9/-k 1 bl 1/Tril--£1 Lf//HE --1- /0/ Ii-0/0 /0 /0 / /1 lu *G .r' =1 /A// 4 Z·.1 EXE™31 .RGER KIE 7 t.· -1 III 0*fi ; -le'FilliLE )· i · MID 6 f -|li||i||i-< I./..-- 22€56=t ---,r-,E..,, ,r,l./u..9.46....'... „.., R]Gift TUNS ely wm,3,waer' -0- . &-Er=-- 0 -- --- -- -- --- MA!02WIDIFFirM mi¥1#1 -- -1-Ii# 4E j9111 ...J 1123.... - ,if_ 1 EE&23*---**i€-AE'Ciager 5% 505£·Ef 5225-..==E'- 22:JECE£·22.3:EspSe BEES.,:-,.,<0..li:F mu 2 4 IMED<NE¥IWL©]IPMEMN'F' PLAIN] 1 -2TOWN CIN'rill 02&.AZA L f= W EM A¥2 ANg WAE-WORTH 01-¥13. II a £---GI WH=ATIOE= COLOR&¤0 ""9%#mannJ t.,20SWE Im-1%50€ \42 =v=198 737 · 7 [73 -r--1- PA<. 117 43 m teL. *-PrWS 6*7 9-8-95 /00 R.M.tou•4-iwpa-' 1//1 PA..im 4/0 *0=[1 IMAT [RODGIE IMIA®KIEFFLA©[E SE@[309080©[M, FO[EST' FOLONIG EURDICK EMGOEERNG CC»GJLTANTS »10P0RATED CM [*-4 I ./. D...'/0 2,00 1 -*-0, *th L,--d. CO 00227-,4/1 92272 Norms: 1) Field survey control based upon City of Wheat Ridge right-of- way Map & Reverence Monuments filed for record as Reception No. 88110485 and Breakdown of Section 23, T)S, R69W, City of Wheat Ridge.West line of Southeast One-quarter of gaid Section bears MOO°10'12•W as per field control records. 2) Coordinates of listed street monuments: lia/ tingm:ft--101129 Mt#82 55*9ii 40447.9710 S84104805 5709 15382.7661 37814.3406 S86022644 4709 18027.0022 37806.4942 3) All parking spaces and all driveways are hereby designated by blanket ea/ement for use by all owners and tenants. and their gueats. and shall be conaidered ao a cro/0-parking easement and cro/8-acce«/ easement. 4) Thole areal indicated as •Ingrese-Egress Easement' shall also allow for general public accessand adjacent property access through the Subdivision within said demignated easements, at mutually agreed upon access points. -1 42--- 4 30. A Resubdivision of PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDMENT and a Subdivision of a part of the Southeast One-quarter of 5809 Section 23, Township 3 South, Ronge 69 West of the 6th P.M. City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado SE Cor SE1/4 J Sec. 23, T33, R6PW ZONE R-3 SHEET 1 OF 2 (584104805) Fd. 3-1/4' C.O.W. ZONE R-C Monument #13212 NOT SUBDIVIDED B i SOO'11'37 E, 721.65' 6 606.65' ------ ----11400' ---- - 375.52' 1 SOO·11'37"E , 498.07''ABLTm073=4. 223.66' \ 10 QINGREES-EGRESS & UTILITY EASEMENT ]A ,#M m t.R r :MiP' 0 DEDICATION CERTIFICATE WHEAT RIDGE MAEKEr PLACE, a Colorado General Partnership, being the owner of the real property of 13.537 acres described am follown Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7 and 8, Block 1. PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION, FIRST AME,mMENT and a part of the Southeast One-quarter of Section 23, Townehip 3 South, Range 69 Weit of the Gth Principal Meridian,City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson. State of Colorado. being more particularly deecribed H follows Commencing at the iouthwest corner of the Southeast One-quarter ofsaid Section 23; thence N56•00'30•E, a distance of 54.17 feet to the southwest corner of Block 1. •aid PARK AID SHOP SUBDIVISION, FIRST Al{EXDMENT, which point ia the True Point Of Bogioning; thenceNOO°10'12•W, parallel with and 45.00 feet east of the wut line of gaid Southea,t One-quarter and along the west line of said Block 1,a distance of 1027.80 feet to the northwe,t corner of said Block 1; thence N89•38'23•: along the north line of said Block 1 andparallel with the •outh line of said southeast One-quarter. adistance of 612.80 feet to the northeast corner of said Block 1; thence 500'11'37"E along the east line of iaid Block 1, a distanceof 606.65 feet to an easterly corner of said Block 1, thence continuing SOO' 11'37•2 departing Iaid easterly corner, a distanceof 115.00 feet; thence 889°38'23"W parallel with the south line ofsaid Southeast One-quarter. a distance of 131.65 feet to a point onthe east line of said Block 1; thence 800'10'12•E parallel with the west line of maid Southeast One-quarter and along the east line ofsaid Block 1, a distance of 297.65 feet to a point on the northline of the parcel of land conveyed to the City of Wheat Ridge byhception No. 90086576, which point is also on the north right-of- way lini of West 38th Avenue; thence S89°38'23"W along the northline of said parcel of land and along gaid north right-of-way line,a distance of 251.10 feet, thence NOO°21'37"W along the north line 1 .W 1 ..1 - ' h of said parcel of land and along north right-of-way line. a1=11'37.4. 403.21 /1, i \ r11.95 83.02' . S17'46'371 r--Ch= 501·51'47V I distance of 6.20 feet, thence 089°38'23•W along the north line of/ P ..Idm.7./., 4-57- p&'===,=6 30 \,4 11 6 4/ -,if,T:Ki:i':fp91 '1 50- . Set 05 Bar & Cap #9010 6 | nid parcel of land and along said north right-of-way linedistnace of 23.00 feet; thence 800'21'37•E along the north line ofI eaid parcel of land and along said north right-of-way line, adistance of 6.20 feet; thence S89°38'23•W along the north line of--n 0'14t ,4 30 1 6 /-10.00' / . South line SE 1/4 said parcel of land and along nid north right-of-way line, a--I-n\ I Easement limits 9 10' SIGNAGE AN . . ty, /-Sec.233, T35, R69*di,tance of 17.50 feet; thenco S00°21'37E along the north line ofsaid parcel of land and along said north right-of-way line, al.== SE#ER '11%fl--.-11130-\ SOO'10'12»¥, 297.65'\2-f" S DEDICATED TO THE di/tance of 8.50 feet to a point on the mouth line cf said Block 1;ZUR> -Easement vacated by this plat 211.10r,rirsrerrU- w-189.80 feet, more or le•i, to the True Point of Beginning.0 1 38 1 2=21'371 ,%11 288.86' \ 39L..-< (BY THS PLAT)One-quarter and along the south line of said Block 1, a distance of (RIc. F0136130)CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE thence S89°38'23•W parallel with the south line of said Southeast = Conterline I NOO'21'377.212-30' Lii i, , O See·38'23'W, b soo·21'371 10010'2- _ NOO·21·311, 233.51 __45·1'23,and have laid out, subdivided and platted said land as per the ac. •Acres F --41,1'37Vr·-'1 ®774¢k. e -0.060 ock MARKT PLACE SUBDIVISION. FIRST FILING, a subdivision of a part ofdrawing hereon contained under the name and style of WHEAT RIDGE ------------------- . -'41Lfa?,3 -SS@38'23»w,dedicate to the City of Wheat Ridge and the public. street/, roads,ho'[ Noo·1%371 170.20 LOT 5 the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and by these presents do Rec.0 -Recording Reception Number oq t; ·g 251.10'and avenues and drives as shown on the accompanying plat for the(5847-63.*)BLOCK :C 1-& A Util. *Utility LOT 4E Mt-un P (1.7760(,d:) N00·21'37y./ 50'19E Ch- 1,402 W public ume forever. 141 OWNER: Es=t. -Easement p 04153 10.00'-0 < 19 <9 40 FHEAT RIDGE . MARK:ETPLACTES»t>- -S LOT 7 NHEAT RIDGE MARKET PLACE, 1 6'0-(0.989 ac.*)A Colorado Gineral Partnership S36·53'18V. M ---, -r 01:,P- 91= f.,tgitE*ik*>€_ i 10' SIGNAGE A to 00 By:DAVIral Partner6272.5¢8, . 1 ---41#)472·13237 =Ar./. rr...'-Il<54 19 0 g , 00 By: 9 4*Nt©03te*52 u)k®>rw C>. J>Avrs·m...&/-*#.. General Partner >h 07 r---,-,s,·371 :89·38'23'W, SOO-21-371 145.83 E g .33·.=-/1.18! 1 Nal·38'237L-1 N:,V 6 ---Z"L____----12112#2124- i .5 __ ;,21'37"E.4 ' FIRST FILING ----- o11 15 612 '37W, ;---*idler ri ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ZONE C-1 132.4, ----11*28--mrf'· 130.18' 4 900.21:S89'38'23"W.State of Cwado ) 270 06 Aid 4 17.50'1 1 05 10% \ -1667-EDREES County 02 GPIMA ) o'_SOO'21'37»E,: I =0 18 SM--4# b- -/ 1 EjSEMENT 15•r-8.50'day of AYUM'M/ ,1995, by Ronald T. D.vis, Goneral PartnerThe fires(6g_1%,t .0 acknowledged beforo me on this 740" SOO·21'371 424.24' of DAVIS =TERPRISES, General Partner of WIEAT RIDGE MARKET' PLACE,| "66'21'371 245.83'39 MOO·21'37'W. 141.09' --411#00,33----8 (0'Md.t)189.80' -__S89'38'23"W ,a Colorado General Parin•rahip.01. 1 38732' b A r-------711 37*$970 1 1..,30'Witness =y hand and official *eat-71,400·21'374. 458.83 | - £ 8' PSC EShIT.(O.958 ac.t)1 G i.zt2-BF--9,Y-lti--». 2*65. pg. 509) FORMERLY BLOCK 1 P N D SHOP SUBDMSION \ 0 No-tary Publici | DE[ICATED TO THE :2 1* 9.: LOT 3 FIRS1 AMENDMENT '1- ' . M=Th04.-1 ' /0 %E°&.=C.*), My Co=inion expires:ID ·04 ·9 F 2 (1.019 ac.*)-4- / (BY THIS PLAQ , . 4,li 82 1 ./\1 2 2£ ¥4R69* ' SOO'10'121 387.82'MOO·10'12* 303.460 h/ 4 3/7 SOO-10'12 186.55'10'12X 132.477 „. 1 2 - h.\60' 0162214 THE CITY oF WHEAT RIDGE (0.472 21 2 11009 1411 1027.83'N IES' : 30 Aikilic 0Grvic€l, company Cidy of Whekt Ridge,1531 14 (S&6022644)142.85' 1015' b 6 /- 1 7 Fd. 3-1/4' C.O.W.88.31· 1 '03*plorado _ ,Directprtl-9iMonument #13212 NOO'10'12"W. 1027.80'PERMANENT RTD I -44: EASENENT(RE. #91002001) I 34 5709 s. let CAnicatiog@ City of'¥hlat Ridgi,4709 Noo·10'12y. 2645.05' (Not to Scale) , 1.-24' b ChairmanW Parks an Recreation Commission--West line SE1/4 WADSWORTH BOULEVARD (SH 121)aty of I,Seat Ridge/, Sec.23, TE, R69W SW Cor. 921/4 Planning and Devilq»intSec.23, TaS, R69W-Director(SB4104804) SURVEYOR' S CERTIFICATE GRAPHIC SCALE Fd. 3-1/3 C.O.W. 10.00' *72·13'23 1 LOT 6 Ch- NOCy 631(1.717-2=E) tiSUBDIVISIONA 6- 9 213./5 12.50'/ i 130. LOT 2 L AlhZ 4%10 s/ 1- = 60 .Or, Um//1 .1./El/12,9 I:...'ll.:.LUI, WUU..AUI. I, Eugene A. Burdick, a Registered Profes,ional Engineer and Professional Land Surveyor registered in the State of colorado, do Thi* ii to certify that the within plat has been approved by the hereby corti fy that the survey of the boundary o f 111[EAT RIDGE Z-.-/--Planning cammission of the , MARKET PLACE SUBDIVISION. FIRST FILING, was made under my directreeponsibility, supervilion, and checking, and in accordance with AREA = 13.537 ac. i all applicable Colorado Statutes, current revised edition, as amended.CLERK AND RECORDER' S CERTIFICATE City ZE Wheat Ridge. Colorado BoU=; Any per'crl who knowingly removal. otters or defeces any Public Land Survey Monument, or lind boundary monument. or occessory, cornmits a clces 2 Misdemeanor pursucnt to Stote Stotute 18-4-508 C.R.S. Notice- According to Colorado Low you .mwal commence any 10gal action based upon any defect in th18 8urvey within three yeon after you first discover such defect In no.ent, rn. ory octlen based upoi any defect in this survey be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon 100-YEAR FLOCD PLAIN:Subject property ie not located within a designated flood hazard area.The foregoing =tatement i, based upon information current on 2-4-88 and i, subject to revision due to changing conditions after said date. For and an behalf of BURDICK =SIN=RING rdick. PE-PLS No. 9010Col#rado Reg Staze of Colorado ) County of Jefferson ) I hereby certify that this lat was filed in ny offige LA,/k--o, clock -2.·=. on this *INF day o. Dect/h/r *:443!D·,- and i, duly recorded in Plan Filepaid ,«1 U A.LD '0'12· , ···492" MAYOR' S CERTIFICATE This i• to certify that the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado by motiond on the 794 day of Z1»a€.-t_ . 3 the within plat and accept the dedications 8--2,2.,1.., Mayor order of ir.-aBA Council di199¤ J!1Wd approvi MS EAL Jmbl T: City 51 BRA17 Reo.+Fog-6:07 BURDICK ENGINEEANG CONSULTANTS INCORPORATED WHEAT ®me[E [MIA[RK[Elf[PILACE ©U©©09080©NI, 90®87 [POLO[NIG L,k-mod CO 00227-2401 CMI E*,Irk,g & L=·d Sur·•l 2109 s. Wad,-A ld ·God,n L-I No,A 92272 A Resubdivision of PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDMENT and a Subdivision of a part of the Southeast One-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M. City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado r SBC)9 SHEET 2 OF 2 ZONE R-3 SE Cor SE1/4 _Sec. 23, T3S. R69W (S841 04805) Fd 3-1/4' CO.W. 2Monument #13212 ZONE R-C NOT SUBDIVIDED SOO'11'37'E, 721.65' U SOO'11'37-E . 488.07'223.58' NOO·21'37-W, 212.30' ZONE PCD ,08'3 19 '3.<Z,8£.69N 57-1 stl· f let.0.ZLN 2 -0 E South line SE 1/4 -Sec.23, TJS, R69W LOT 6 (1.717 cd=) SOO'10'12"E, 297.65'9.0 288.65' 8.50'DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - (BY THIS PLAT] R NOO'21'37,6 233.51 .---3=- 0.060 ce.* LOT 5 £_S89'38'23'W, (5.847-ac.*) BLOCK *-,*.CAA 1 .2 251.10'12% - · 140021'374/*,1.%™ \di 8%! 10.00' 4 \E -LOT 7 NA 11< a WHEAT RIDGE MARKETPLACE *p SUBDIVISIC (0.989 ac.*) · '9 001 - ut FIRST FILING :eSCLOT 4 0.776 oc.*)NOO'21'3771:R c & 0 6.20\ 10,21'371 185.83' -33SOO'21'37"E, * ZONE C-1 LQI.i 6.20' 1366 NOC)'21'37W, 130.38· ,SOO·21'37$ 132.47'S89'38'23"W, 17.50'12.50•-SOO'21'37'E.Z 8 8.50'LOT 1 0 -S89*38'23W,SOO-21'371 245.83 NOO*21'37W. 141499' 6 3 (0.574 oc.*)189.80'3878¥LOT 2- 2 :g Co N.¥ (0.958 0.4 2 LOT 3 FORMERLY BLOCK 1 PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION J M M DE[ ICATED TO THE w CITY OF WHEAT(1.019 ac.*)FIRST b AMENDMENT & /7 RIDGE (0.125 oc.*) 54 1 · / (BY THIS PLAT) 0 9- -NW Cor SE1/4 SOO·10'12-4 387.82'NOO·10'12W, 303.46' SOO·10'122 188.55 ,NOO'10'12'W, 132.47' 17.3 Sec. 23, T3S, R69W ' '1010.32 NOO•11'41"E, 1027.83'(S86022644) g 20' DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF- WHEAT RIDGE (0.472 cat) (By tht: Plot)PFd. 3-1/4- C.O.W. / k(onument #13212 NOO'10'12»W, 1027.80'.k 9 6 4709 AU \NOC)'10'12W. 2645.05' (Not to Scale) 9 '64 3709 -West line SE 1/4 WADSWORTH BOULEVARD (SH 121)Sec.23, TJS, R69W SW Cor. SE 1/4 / Sec.23, TJS, R69*-/ GRAPHIC SCALE (S84104804) Fd. 3-1/3' C.O.W.f = 60'Monument --'39' Wlitlt Ridge /-COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City ofWheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 July 11, 2017 OFFICIAL ADDRESS CHANGE NOTIFICATION is hereby given that the following address has been assigned to the property/properties as indicated below: CURRENT ADDRESS: 7323.7348 West 38th Avenue & Vacant Lot NEW ADDRESS:7333 West 38th Avenue SUBDIVISION: LOT(s): 0001 C Vacant Lot)KEY: 090.220 SECTION: 23 PARCEL NO: 39-234-00-089.39-234-00-088 and 39-234-04-030 NOTES: This is a courtesv notificatio#/l n AUTHORIZED BY: loi/DATE·. 0 19- DISTRIBUTION: 1. Property Owner 2. Jefferson County Assessor, ATIN: Data Control, Lacey Baker email to lbaker®jeflke.us 3. Jefferson County Elections, ATIN: H. Roth, 3500 Illinois St., Laramie Building, Suite 1100, Golden, CO 80401 4. Email to Jeffco IT (Mapping) Services at smitchelca:ieffco.us and edelvnko(@ieffco.us 5. Jeffco Public Schools, ATIN: Communication Services, 1829 Denver West Dr., Bldg. 27, Golden, CO 80401 6. U.S. Post Office, 4210 Wadsworth Blvd., Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 7. Email to erlindati.martineziesps.gov and krissy..1.summerfieldca,usps.gov and arlene.a.vickrey®usps.gov 8. Xcel Energy, sandra.cardenas@xcelenergv.com 9, Century Link, Capacity Provisioning Specialist, 5325 Zuni St., Room 728, Denver, CO 80221 10. Comcast, Attn: Scott Moore, 6850 S. Tucson Way, Englewood, CO 80112 11. Wheat Ridge Water District 12. Wheat Ridge Sanitation District 13. West Metro Fire District 14. Wheat Ridge Planning Division 15. Wheat Ridge Building Division 16. Wheat Ridge Police Department 17. GIS Specialist 18. Log File NOTE: Please notify all other parties concerned. ADDRESS MAP UPDATED BY:DATE: www.ci.wheatridge.co.us 6 J t , ¥rE 1 1 1/l. " . 17-· · r•rr:- r./ no address PIN: 39-234-04-030 z f 0--0 .... .... 7 . I .... -* 1 St ... 3845 Upharr 7391 W. 38th AL,e 7012 C 1.1 JLJ W. 38th Ave f 4 k 1. * .r / , 38THAVE-.Aj• i0-U .W¥-,4. . -'-.--1.- - -' 22:r. 41= NUi ..1 * .404 1 _1-4 1 1,271i* 4 " 9 b. 1., h 11 0 4 01,1,:1 - 1 1 . 9.I ,, 0 2 iE I 't' J . I . 4.4.. -F ' m. 7333 W. 38th Ave"*•4.- (Lot 1, West End 38 Filing No. 1) ' 1, 5 7391 W. 38th Ave amiAVE -I -I /1. Lauren Mikulak From:Lauren Mikulak Sent:Thursday, May 25, 2017 1:13 PM To:'Tyler Downs' Subject:RE: WE38 / VB - Preferred Transformer Location Exhibit Just on the site plan if it's not already shown. From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.com] Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 9:47 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: WE38 / VB - Preferred Transformer Location Exhibit Thanks Lauren. I think the Vectra transformer will be pretty small. Ours, I've been told, is going to be 104" x 100" - which is enormous. I'm very glad you're ok with us putting it in the far northeast ROW along Upham as that would be a pretty big eyesore if it were by the focal points of the building. Do you want us to note the locations on the site plan or plat? From: Lauren Mikulak [mailto:Imikulak@ci.wheatridae.co.usl Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 5:34 PM To: Tyler Downs Subject: RE: WE38 / VB - Preferred Transformer Location Exhibit Tyler, It's no issue to have the transformers in the ROW as you've proposed. We already have a franchise agreement with Xcel, so we wouldn't require any separate documentation. I do appreciate you going to some length to consider the least obtrusive options. I'm hoping they are dwarfed by the size of the building, and I'm guessing the eye will focus on architecture and landscaping instead of the transformers. Thanks, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2845 C - W lieat Iii< lcie-'0-- COMMI IN I I Y 111 VI I (11'M I N 7" 2, From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.coml Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 12:02 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: WE38 / VB - Preferred Transformer Location Exhibit 1 Lauren, We've been having a difficult time locating the Xcel transformers to serve both the apartment/mixed use property and the new Vectra Bank property. The best places for us to locate these transformers are depicted on the attached exhibit. The issue is that both locations are inside the City ROW. As you know, it's always a challenge to meet build to requirements and also satisfy Xcel's clear radius and height requirements at the same time. This proposed solution works best for us, but I realize it may not work for the City. The other solutions we looked at involved transformers that were half in/half out of the ROW creating a weird easement/row straddle. The other solutions put the transformers right at the front door, or immediately adjacent to site triangles or high visibility areas. Our solution prioritized aesthetics and architectural conformance at the expense of likely heartburn from the City. 1 understand this proposal may not sit well and we are obviously open to other options. When you've had a chance to review, let's discuss. Thanks, Tyler From: Palmer, Kelsey [mailto:kelsey.palmer@kimley-horn.coml Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2017 11:47 AM To: Downs, Tyler Cc: Sobieski, Dennis Subject: WE38 / VB - Preferred Transformer Location Exhibit Hi Tyler, Per our phone conversation with Jim, here is the updated transformer exhibit showing the preferred locations for Vectra Bank and the West End 38 site. Please let me know if you have any comments! Thanks! Kelsey Palmer I PE (AZ, CO) Kimley-Horn I 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 Direct: 303 228 2332 1 Main: 303 228 2300 1 www.kimlev-horn.com/land-development Celebrating ten years as one of FORTUNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For **Please note I will be out of the office from May 31St through June 19th with no access to phone or email** 2 Lauren Mikulak From:Lauren Mikulak Sent:Friday, September 1, 2017 7:21 AM To:Chris Downs; Tyler Downs Subject:RE: Wheat Ridge Water Easement We discussed this issue the other, and it may be helpful to understand the specifics of the requested easement from the water district. They can overlay an easement, but they can't overlay an exclusive easement which would undercut the public access and utility easement that is already there. We aren't aware of any tools to help them otherthan explaining those options-use what's there or create an easement that doesn't interfere with existing easements. Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Planning Manager Office Phone: 303-235-2845 . i C ity (,1, W lieal- 12 ic lae--COMMUNIn- Divill)1'%,IN'*- b From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 4:13 PM To: 'Chris Downs' <chris@cdownslaw.com>; Tyler Downs <tdowns@wazeepartners.com> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge Water Easement We have had experience with water districts wanting exclusive easements, so that part isn't too unusual, but it is frustrating that they aren't acknowledging the existing utility easement for their use. Let me bounce this off our team. Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Planning Manager Office Phone: 303-235-2845 .£ 11# 4,1:0 w lic>at 12*_lge --00-=l.OMMUNIn- Diril.(,t,MINI From: Chris Downs [mailto:chris@cdownslaw.coml Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:26 AM To: Tyler Downs <tdowns@wazeepartners.com>; Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge Water Easement Lauren, We had a similar discussion earlier with you and I believe Steve Art and Ken, regarding the Vance roadway and how the adjacent storm detention area along Vance might be awkward when we finally got our plans together. 1 think there was some consideration given by the City to assist regarding the Vance area right of way dedication and the 30' public right of way and utility dedication. 1 Basically, are there simple condemnation powers at your disposal that can get the Water District over the hump. Has this happened before? Chris From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.coml Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 10:55 AM To: Imikulak@ci.wheatridqe.co.us Cc: Chris Downs Subject: Wheat Ridge Water Easement Lauren, Attached to this email you will find a colored map of our ALTA survey for the West End 38 project. The colors represent the various easements at the property. We have a minor problem that we were hoping you might be able to offer some guidance regarding. We have a new fire hydrant going in on the west boundary to our property, in the southwest corner of the site, just across the access drive from behind the Bradley Service Station. The most logical place for us to complete the fire loop connection is into the water line in the Marketplace subdivision, which is located in the middle of what I'm going to refer to as "Vance Street", even though it is not a City owned ROW. We know that the Marketplace actually owns the property underneath "Vance" but has dedicated a public access and utility easement to the City of Wheat Ridge. There is another, separate water easement that partially overlaps the public access and utility easement. We have colored in that easement with pink highlighter. I have put a red rectangle around the area that Wheat Ridge Water says they need a water easement to connect our fire hydrant to the water line inside the marketplace subdivision. As you can see, there is a small (maybe 5-7 foot) gap between the existing Water Easement and our property. Even though there is still a general access and utility easement covering the gap between the Water Easement and our property, WR Water District is refusing to accept this and says they need a special water easement for the gap area. Does the City have any tools, or do you have any thoughts that might help solve forthis gap in the water easement? Thanks, Tyler Tyler Downs Wazee Partners, LLC 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Office: 720-420-1568 Email: tdowns@wazeepartners.com 2 Sanitation District Friday, April 28, 2017 11:31 AM Master study for subbasin When developers come, insert their flows to undersand impact to subbasin Cost recovery Board willpay 50% of 25k Developers pay 25% each Corners has 4 options 3 reasonable options • 300' on Wads • 38th to upham • 38th no harlan WE • Upham • 38 3x2 = 6 options WE38 - apts always have to go down upham becaes too far north 80% capactiy = red Peak factor wet condition (worst case during rain event) factor of 4 Corners down 38th until Wads is complete During Wads - fill gap and upsize north of 44th Participation fees and tap fees from Corners will cover cost of Wads portion WE38 - fixes 44th $750,000 - with traffic control etc. upsize the lines... Board would upsize the million Divided total by units = participation fee About $150 per foot Board will pay to pull the plug in 38th Corners is already paying participation fees West End 38 Page 1 Flow Study Boundary Site A. "00 ne Lf-1_ . 1 - 1 4- A. 4,74 ™ME! ACRE L_NE 4 "0 0 ..0 I u 'BE-,r A. fli] 11.71 - 41. REA :"Imt!g - OIl] I n04 E 11 111:,4, 1 - -41 1 1.-/ I.1 7- M B 3700 1- - i- - Im ZLWU U - -I..'-i lilli - 1-Y- @MMERZE 9 2-lk=- -.. A. - 1 L .R I R .. 1.--- .. E - . '- 1--fle Fl -2--4 = -Ii' E m 1 M '#FREE.U »Ilk£-:L- ••-1=£- 4-_7227- -I /0 1 ./ 1 11£1I. :2 670 1- = • 11 180 - /-k- 1 1 1 .-=_24 - 6 = t-- ,U- t .,-, 01 11! ililli T -+r Lauren Mikulak From:Patrick Roberts <PRoberts@martinmartin.com> Sent:Monday, August 28, 2017 12:21 PM To:Lauren Mikulak; Tyler Downs CC:Bill Willis; Travis Stevens; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Mike Bakarich; Tim Flynn; Russ Higgins; Steve Art; Chris Downs Subject:RE: WRSD - West End 38 Improvements - 44th Avenue - City of Wheat Ridge Overlay meeting Thank you Lauren. Tyler, We will coordinate the City's requirements and revise the EOPC for the project. We will be installing to the west of Upham, so a full lane mill and overlay will be required. Patrick Roberts, PE, CCM Senior Project Engineer, Certified Construction Manager PE (CO) From: Lauren Mikulak [mailto:Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 12:18 PM To: Tyler Downs <tdowns@wazeepartners.com>; Patrick Roberts <PRoberts@martinmartin.com> Cc: Bill Willis <BWILLIS@martinmartin.com>; Travis Stevens <TStevens@martinmartin.com>; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Mike Bakarich <mbakarich@morainco.com>; Tim Flynn <tflynn@ccefirm.com>; Russ Higgins <rhiggins@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Steve Art <sart@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Chris Downs <chris@cdownslaw.com> Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38 Improvements - 44th Avenue - City of Wheat Ridge Overlay meeting Good morning, We actually met internally to discuss this topic today. The City will be modifying the limits of the overlay for 44th Avenue to begin at Upham instead of Vance. The section of 44th between Vance and Upham will be delayed until Upham is overlaid in 2019. To that end, the deadline to complete the sanitation work will be September 2019. In terms of restoration work, you will need to coordinate with Russ on specifications. Because we recently overlaid Wadsworth to Vance, the restoration will need to be the full width of the lane(s) that are impacted by the trench. Between Vance and Upham, the restoration scope can be for the trench only and can be more temporary in nature because it will be overlaid in 2019. We have not reviewed the cost estimate, but these different levels of restoration should be taken into account. I've attached a graphic that helps to illustrates these three segments. Please let me know if there are any further questions or if you feel that meeting is still necessary. Thanks, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Planning Manager Office Phone: 303-235-2845 1 . C 11,· & 4 ..10$,V/heal lgpge-·/1OMMUNIIN |)[VIL<)1'MINI From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.coml Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 8:47 AM To: Patrick Roberts <PRoberts@martinmartin.com> Cc: Bill Willis <BWILLIS@martinmartin.com>; Travis Stevens <TStevens@martinmartin.com>; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Mike Bakarich <mbakarich@morainco.com>; Tim Flynn <tflvnn@cccfirm.com>; Russ Higgins <rhiggins@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Steve Art <san@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Chris Downs <chris@cdownslaw.com> Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38 Improvements - 44th Avenue - City of Wheat Ridge Overlay meeting Patrick, Thanks for your email and my apologies we haven't been able to connect via phone yet. We think it makes sense to have a meeting. In addition to Russ, I've also copied Steve Art and Lauren Mikulak from the City. If possible, 1 think having a meeting at the City of Wheat Ridge makes the most sense. 1'11 let the City suggest a few dates/times that might work for a meeting. Thanks, Tyler From: Patrick Roberts [mailto:PRoberts@martinmartin.coml Sent: Monday, August 28, 2017 8:09 AM To: tdowns@wazeepartners.com Cc: Bill Willis; Travis Stevens; info@wheatridqesanitation.com; Mike Bakarich; Tim Flynn; rhiggins@ci.wheatridge.co.us Subject: WRSD - West End 38 Improvements - 44th Avenue - City of Wheat Ridge Overlay meeting Tyler, I left you a phone message last Thursday to discuss the information received from the City of Wheat Ridge Overlay meeting and the contractor's overlay schedule in the area of the required upsizing within 44th Avenue. The City's pavement contractor plans to begin the portion of 44th Avenue overlay at the beginning of October, which a preliminary timeframe of approximately one week for completion. The District has recently sent in the public advertisement for the upsizing (attached) and plans to open the bid on September 8th, 2017 (if enough bidding interest is received from utility contractors). On August 21 St, the City of Wheat Ridge provided their review for the project. The CDOT utility permit for entry into Wadsworth is in the process of being submitted. Through previous coordination, you had indicated that Wazee was planning to provide the sanitary sewer upsizing funds to begin work in early 2018. With this expected date, the overlay would be completed and the City would have a 2-year moratorium on this portion of the road. When it is available, 1 would recommend we try to set a meeting with the City of Wheat Ridge representatives, City's contractor (if applicable), District representatives, and Wazee representatives, to discuss the aspects of the project and possible additional requirements/possible overlay schedule shift/ from the City if work needs to occur in 2018 due to funding timing. I have cc'd Russ Higgins on this email (project engineer for the City in charge of the overlay project), so he is aware of the sanitary sewer project as he will be involved with this project as well. 2 Thank you, Patrick Roberts, PE, CCM Senior Project Engineer, Certified Construction Manager PE (CO) Martin/Martin, Inc. 12499 W. Colfax Ave., Lakewood, CO 80215 P) 303-431-6100 Ext. 353 www.martinmartin.com This e-mail and any file (s) transmitted with it contain privileged and confidential information and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, disclosure or copying of this e-mail disclosure or copying of this e-mail or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. Thank you. 3 Lauren Mikulak From:Travis Stevens <TStevens@martinmartin.com> Sent:Thursday, June 29,2017 8:27 AM To:Tyler Downs CC:Lauren Mikulak; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Tim Flynn; Patrick Roberts; chris@cdownslaw.com; Bill Willis; Mike Bakarich Subject:RE: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter Tyler, Please send the check for $12,500 (design + survey) to the District Office. 7100 W. 44th Ave., #104 Wheat Ridge, CO 80034 303-424-7252 Thanks, Travis Stevens Engineer-in-Training I From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.com] Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2017 8:23 AM To: Travis Stevens <TStevens@martinmartin.com> Cc: Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Tim Flynn <tflynn@cccfirm.com>; Patrick Roberts <PRoberts@martinmartin.com>; chris@cdownslaw.com; Bill Willis <BWILLIS@martinmartin.com> Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter Thanks Travis. Are we to send a check for $10,000 to the District or $12,500 ($10k design + survey)? Please just let us know. Thanks. From: Travis Stevens [mailto:TStevens@martinmartin.coml Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 7:56 AM To: Tyler Downs Cc: Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co. us; info@wheatridaesanitation.com; Tim Flynn; Patrick Roberts; chris@cdownslaw.com; Bill Willis Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter Tyler, Please see that attached design fee document for System Development Improvements necessary to serve the West End 38 project. Let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Travis Stevens Engineer-in-Training I From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 9:19 AM 1 To: Travis Stevens <TStevens@martinmartin.com> Cc: Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Tim Flynn <tflvnn@cccfirm.com>; Patrick Roberts <PRoberts@martinmartin.com>; chris@cdownslaw.com; Bill Willis <BWILLIS@martinmartin.com> Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter Importance: High Travis and Bill, This "Will Serve" letter is adequate, thanks. We would like to proceed with the design and pricing of the System Development Improvements necessary to serve the West End 38 project. We understand these improvements consist of about 630 lineal feet of new storm pipe along 44th Avenue between Upham and Wadsworth. We assume Martin and Martin will be designing the improvements, but please advise what the District will require from us to design and price these improvements. Thanks, Tyler From: Travis Stevens [mailto:TStevens@martinmartin.coml Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 3:46 PM To: Tyler Downs Cc: Imikulak@ci.wheatridqe.co.us; info@wheatridqesanitation.com; Tim Flynn; Patrick Roberts; chris@cdownslaw.com; Bill Willis Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter Tyler, Please see our attached will serve letter for the development. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Travis Stevens Engineer-in-Training I From: Bill Willis Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 8:45 PM To: Tyler Downs <tdowns@wazeepartners.com>; Travis Stevens <TStevens@martinmartin.com>; chris@cdownslaw.com Cc: Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Tim Flynn <tflvnn@cccfirm.com>; Patrick Roberts <PRoberts@martinmartin.com> Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter Tyler, No problem. The Bank must have been the requested will serve from City. We were unaware that you needed this for the entire system for the bank. We are completing and then sending to Tim Flynn for review of wording as we discussed. Thanks From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:22 AM To: Travis Stevens <TStevens@martinmartin.com>; chris@cdownslaw.com Cc: Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Tim Flynn <tflvnn@cccfirm.com>; Bill Willis <BWILLIS@martinmartin.com>; Patrick Roberts <PRoberts@martinmartin.com> Subject: RE: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter 2 Travis, This letter states "Wheat Ridge Sanitation District can provide service to the proposed bank." While the new bank certainly needs service, this letter does not address providing service to the bulk of the West End 38 project - which consists of 165 apartments and 7,700 square feet of retail space. Our lenders require that we receive a very clear "Will Serve" letter specific to the West End 38 project. Is this something you can assist with? Thanks, Tyler From: Travis Stevens [mailto:TStevens@martinmartin.coml Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2017 11:10 AM To: tdowns@wazeepartners.com; chris@cdownslaw.com Cc: Imikulak@ci.wheatridqe.co.us; info@wheatridgesanitation.com; Tim Flynn; Bill Willis; Patrick Roberts Subject: WRSD - West End 38th Will Serve Letter Tyler, The attached proof of submission was sent on May 5th, 2017, for the West End 38th project. The proof of submission states that the District can provide service to the property. It also states that connection to District mainlines is subject to a developer's agreement to participate in system improvements to service the property. Does the City of Wheat Ridge need a formal "Will Serve" letter to proceed with review of a site plan? If so, we can provide the letter at your request. Thanks, Travis Stevens Engineer-in-Training I Martin/Martin, Inc. 12499 W. Colfax Ave., Lakewood, CO 80215 P) 303-431-6100 Ext 282 D) 720-544-5382 www.martinmartin.com This e-mail and any file (s) transmitted with it contain privileged and confidential information and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, disclosure or copying of this e-mail disclosure or copying of this e-mail or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sending individual or entity by e-mail and permanently delete the original e-mail and attachment(s) from your computer system. Thank you. 3 Wheat Ridge Sanitation District 7100 West 44m Avenue, Suite 104 P.O. Box 288 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-0288 Phone: 303-424-7252 Fax: 303-424-2280 June 14, 2017 Tyler Downs Wazee Partners 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Email: tdowns@wazeepartners.com Re:WRSD - Will Serve Letter- West End 38th Martin/Martin, Inc Project No.: 17456.C.01 Dear Mr. Downs, The above referenced property ("Property") is located within the Wheat Ridge Sanitation District and based upon the site plan received on December 15, 2016, sanitary service is available subject to compliance with all applicable District rules and regulations, the payment of all applicable fees and satisfaction of all conditions set forth in this letter. No specific facility locations can be determined until sanitary sewer plans have been submitted to and approved by the District and other appropriate agencies. The District's ability to provide sanitary sewer service is based in part upon compliance with the sanitary sewer flow study performed and completed by Martin & Martin June of 2017 and is expressly conditioned on the owner/developer executing an agreement with the District for participation in the cost of District's system improvements needed to serve the Property. Other conditions include, but are not limited to the conveying of all appropriate easements and the installation and acceptance of all sewer mains and appurtenances needed to serve the Property. All sewer mains and appurtenances must meet the District's specifications. All applicable District and Metro Wastewater Reclamation District sewer tap fees must be paid prior to service. All easements for sewer service must be conveyed to the District by Easement Agreement with the District. Costs The amount of the sanitary sewer tap fees will be based on the water meter tap size for the proposed multi-family and commercial developments. Once documentation is provided citing the water meter size with appropriate certification for this sizing, a tap fee document can be provided. All costs involved are to be deposited in advance - reviews, construction observation, and inspections - are the responsibility of the Owner/Developer at the then current rate fee structure. Please be aware that proper tap and development fees are required to be paid prior to connection to the District main. A minimum 72-hour notice prior to construction is required following District receipt of all fees. These fee amounts can be paid directly to the District Office prior to connection, payable to Wheat Ridge Sanitation District, which also collects Metro Wastewater's "connection fees". The District's authority to issue sewer tap permits can be restricted or terminated by Metro Wastewater at any time. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me at 303-431-6100. Sincerely, 03- 0 0- Bill Willis District Engineer MARTIN/MARTIN, Inc. Lauren Mikulak From:Patrick Goff Sent:Saturday, January 14, 2017 11:24 AM To:Lauren Mikulak; Kenneth Johnstone; Scott Brink CC:Mark Westberg; Steve Art Subject:RE: Sewer Lines Thank you Lauren. I will share with the Mayor. Patrick Goff City Manager Cell Phone: 303-995-6465 A . . £ il, /,15 Vir irat R ic lueMANA(.1 R'S 0111<-C LN From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2017 3:45 PM To: Kenneth Johnstone <kjohnstone@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Patrick Goff <pgoff@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Scott Brink <sbrink@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Mark Westberg <mwestberg@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Steve Art <sart@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: Sewer Lines This morning, Mark and I met with Wheat Ridge Sanitation to discuss the Wadsworth Widening project, and we took some time afterwards to ask about their requirements for the West End 38 development. Below is what we learned today. I just sent the same information to Chris and Tyler Downs. You're welcome to forward this to the Mayor Jay or I'm happy to discuss. Prior to rezoning the area to Mixed Use zone districts, the City outreached to the utility agencies to understand their capacity relative to the densities that would be allowed by the new zoning. Evidently at that time, WR San augmented their fee structure in anticipation of needing to do an upgrade. Regarding the existing infrastructure, the sanitation line is along Wadsworth is not continuous. The attached map shows a large area along and south of 38th that feeds into Upham and then to 44th (including blue boundary which indicates the area for the West End 38 flow study). The area north of 38th Ave (both along and west of Wads) also feeds towards 44h Avenue but in a separate system. Both basin areas are combined into a mainline in Wadsworth that runs from 44th to 48th Avenue. With the Wadsworth Widening, this mainline from 44th to 48th is proposed to be enlarged from an 8" pipe to a 12" pipe, and the district is actively saving money for that project. Their previous studies (at the time of rezoning) have not indicated a need for overwhelming upgrades of the entire system. Additionally, given the depths and flows, it would not necessarily improve the situation to connect the line in Wadsworth at 38th Avenue. Regarding the recent comments from WR San on the West End 38 development, it is evidently common practice for the District to request a flow study for a project of this size. It sounds like a meeting with WR San staff would be more appropriate at a later date to specifically discuss the results of the flow study. That study will help to identify if or where specific improvements are needed. For example, if the issue is that inflow and infiltration (1 & 1) is taking up too much capacity that could otherwise be used by development, then it may be possible to line the pipe. If the issue is that a shallow slope in a certain segment is creating a bottleneck, then perhaps only a certain segment would need to be 1 upsized to compensate for the slope issues. 1 didn't get the sense that they thought all of Upham would need to be upsized, but for obvious reasons they didn't say that today since they haven't seen the flow study. Long story short, once the San District has the flow study, they can help to identify and solve specific issues (if any). If improvements are needed, they indicated that they routinely establish a cost-sharing agreement. They did not share the details of these arrangements, but essentially if West End needed to make an improvement, and to the extent that future development in the basin would benefit from those improvements, then future development would contribute funds. Let me know if there are any follow-up questions. Thanks, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2845 C iii' „1:,r- w heal- 12*_lge - COMMUN Il) DEVI 1-01'Ul NI From: Kenneth Johnstone Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 4:00 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Fwd: Sewer Lines Could you provide an update please? Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Joyce Jay <iiav@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Date: January 11, 2017 at 2:37:43 PM MST To: Kenneth Johnstone <kiohnstone@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Patrick Goff <pgoff@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: Sewer Lines I was chatting with Tyler Downs re the hoped apartment complex at 38th & Upham and he mentioned a lack of sewer capacity for that location that could stop the project. That sounds serious. Is the lacking on 38th and what will happen when Wheat Ridge Corners gets rolling? Joyce Jay Mayor City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-235-2800 Fax: 303-234-2824 www.ci. wheatridge.co.us 2 Lauren Mikulak From:Tim Dronkers Sent:Thursday, December 29, 2016 1:54 PM To:Lauren Mikulak Subject:RE: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District Hi Lauren, Here are a few things that jumped out at me: • 2015 Revenue and Expenditure actuals were way off the mark compared to budget (see pg 24 of the audited FS): o Missed on revenue by -17% Cunfavorable); Missed on expenditures by -35% (favorable) o You might first ask where they think they will land budget vs actual 2016. • Overall it appears that the entity is shrinking and providing less service compared to prior years • Net reserve for emergencies is only $3k. I have no idea what the industry average is but this seems like a tiny number-might be underfunded. • Cash flow from operations is negative which might indicate that they cannot sustain further capital outlays without growth in non-capital financing activities. I hope this helps. Happy to take a deeper dive with more guidance. Thanks, Tim Tim Dronkers Accounting Manager Office Phone: 303-235-2817 4 K. ity 1,130 W l ieat 1 125-lge -·-•' Atwis,4114114 SIR%'1( 1 0 From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 11:20 AM To: Tim Dronkers <tdronkers@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District Tim, Would you have time to look at the emails below and the attachments? We're trying to understand WR Sanitation's capital investment planning relative to new development and the Wadsworth Widening. We'll be meeting with them in the coming weeks, but can you offer any observations or takeaways on the attached budget or audit? Thanks, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner 1 Office Phone: 303-235-2845 Clk „f27 W heat Ilidge / Li}&,MlINI IN 13! U 101'MI N I From: Kenneth Johnstone Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 8:19 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Mark Westberg <mwestberg@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Steve Art <sart@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District Lauren, I think the meeting with Bill is the logical next step. I am also still curious who is on their board - does Tyler have that information or does anyone else know how to track that down. I did not see it on their web site. I would recommend we ask Tim D. to review their audit and 2016 budget so that we can better understand what, if any, capacity they have to absorb capital investments. Thanks. Ken Johnstone, AICP Community Development Director Office Phone: 303-235-2844 25/ VV heal I <Elge 't t,64•,1 •·.Il• th'•11•*4,1·41 From: Lauren Mikulak Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 7:46 AM To: Mark Westberg <mwestberg@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Kenneth Johnstone <kiohnstone@ci.wheatridge.co.us>; Steve Art <sart@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: FW: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District Below is additional (interesting) information on WR San. Mark, please let me know if you have scheduled the meeting or if they should call (see Tyler's last question). Thanks, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2845 . 0 . City OtC W heat 12*jge -6* (COMMUNHY DIVI IC)t'MIN I 2 From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.coml Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 3:35 PM To: Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Cc: Chris Downs <chris@cdownslaw.com> Subject: RE: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District Lauren, Here are the relevant attachments we have been able to find. Thanks, Tyler From: Tyler Downs [mailto:tdowns@wazeepartners.coml Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2016 3:25 PM To: Imikulak@ci.wheatridae.co.us Cc: Chris Downs (chris@cdownslaw.com) Subject: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District Lauren, Following up on your voicemail to Chris from last week, here is what we have learned about the Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: Formed 1948 so no Service Plan. Boundaries almost the same as Wheat Ridge Water District though they are managed by different people and have different office addresses. At the end of 2015 the SD had $900k in cash and equivalents, which isn't a lot but the budget also shows $3.5 million in Reserves of which they expected to spend $600k in 2016. They basically broke even in 2015 in part due to a shortfall in projected tap revenues. There are no current capital activities (as of 12/31/15) and the District has no debt. Whether they issued general or revenue obligations in the past is difficult to say. As they only own and operate lines, it is entirely possible that some developer built lines in 1948 and, because there was no city to take them over at the time, he formed the District to take over maintenance and, ever since, developers have built and conveyed any new connections. Forming a sanitation district back then required only a petition to the District Court and an initial election. Wastewater is treated and accepted by Metro Wastewater (as it does for most of the Denver metro area). In 2015 the District collected about $200K in "Developer reimbursements and contributions," so the practice of making developers foot some or all of some site specific expenses appears to be a common practice. There is no agreement form for construction cost reimbursement; rather, their 2015 audit shows a line item for "Sewer Line contributions" from which we can infer that you build it and give it to them after they inspect and accept. There is no legal requirement that a special district anticipate or prepare for additional development except in the context of the operation of a treatment plant and we don't have that problem here. Last, we recently paid $128k in 2015 Sanitary Tap Fees for our 50 unit project at Town Center North. Of that $128k, about $57k was kept by WR Sanitation District, the rest ($72k) was paid to Metro Wastewater. For 38th and Upham, it's reasonable to assume we will pay around $385k in Sanitary Tap Fees, and we would expect WR Sanitation to keep about $171kofthosefees. 3 Some good news is that the district is represented by Jim Collins' firm so at least we have reasonable counsel involved. We can call them, if you wish, to explore what the common practices of the District are. Or we can wait until we have a meeting with Bill Willis from Martin and Martin hopefully next week. Thanks, Tyler Tyler Downs Wazee Partners, LLC 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Office: 720-420-1568 Email: tdowns@wazeepartners.com 4 1,1 ft J r - Vance to Upham - will be overlaid in fall 2019 - will - need to be temporarily is restored after sanitation 4 work - sanitation work in this segment must be ; complete by Sept 2019 * Wadsworth to Vance - r €overlaid in 2016 - will 4 need to be fully restored - after sanitation work im to - will be City of Wheat Ridge Geographic z Information Services Uphe east overlaid in ' fall 2017 .-- r• r{ r F t Iti f 11 r rF A e ,r 4@ rr.. r 1 tf a r . ry 3/.Z, f 0 l .r k 6 F ORIH BLVD mLAIM2.PKKEQE 0 220 State Plane Coordinate Projecbon Colorado Central Zone DMum·NAD83 i This ts a pictonal representation of geographic and demogiaph,c inform/on. Ret=nce upon the accuracy, relability and authomy of th' in'rmation / solely requeston responsibilty. The Ciw of Mbut Ridge, in Jelferion Couny. Co»rado - a polmcal subdllsion of the State of Colorado. hai compited for its uii cert,Wn compe,ized Wormation. Thl RIrmation Is avalable to asslst / identihing gene// 8reas of concern onty. The computelized inbrmation provlded should only be reled upon ¥Ath cor,oboration of the methods, assumptions, and results by a quallmd adependent source. The user of this information Bhal indemnify and hold kee the CIty of Wheat RIdge ffem any Ind al liabilitles, damages, lawiuls, Ind causes of action th# result as s con,equence of his reliance on infermation provided herein. 10- ' City ofWheat Rjdge City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 303.234.5900 Data Source: City of VMeat Ridge Review Comments/ Subsequent Submittals 12(fofal Community DevelopmentCity of- Wheat Nge 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Ph: 303.235.2846 Fax: 303.235.2857 Community Development Referral Form Date Mailed: December 14, 2016 Response Due: January 4, 2017 The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of four related applications for a proposed 3.7-acre mixed use redevelopment at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street. The applications include a subdivision plat, concept plan, site plan, and conditional use permit. No response from you will constitute having no comments, objections, or concerns regarding this proposal. Case No.: MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 Request: The site is currently zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C) and is approximately 3.7 acres in size. The site is comprised of several parcels, including 7391 and 7323 W. 38th Avenue and 3845 Upham Street (see vicinity map on reverse). The property has frontage along two public streets: W. 38th Avenue to the south and Upham Street to the east. It is also served by an access easement shared by the shopping center to the west. The applicant is proposing to scrape the site for a mixed use redevelopment to include two new buildings: a 4-story structure with 155 apartment units and 7,700 square feet of ground floor retail and a freestanding single-story 4,700-square foot building for Vectra Bank (which is currently located on the site). The redevelopment will also include structured parking, outdoor plazas, and new streetscape along both street frontages. Enclosed for your review are the following documents: • A subdivision which proposes to replat the property and dedicate right-of-way on both street frontages. • A concept plan which is intended to provide a general framework for land use concepts and circulation and is required in order to allow a bank drive through on the site. • A site plan set which includes building elevations, landscape and streetscape plans, utility plans, grading plans, and photometric drawings. • A conditional use permit request which is required for the proposed bank drive through. • Various civil documents, including: traffic impact study, geotechnical report, and preliminary drainage report. Please respond to this request in writing regarding your ability to serve the property. Please specify any new infrastructure needed or improvements to existing infrastructure that will be required. Include any easements that will be essential to serve the property as a result of this development. Please detail the requirements for development in respect to your rules and regulations. If you need further clarification, contact the case manager: Case Manager: Lauren Mikulak Phone: 303.235.2845 Email: Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us Fax: 303.235.2845 DISTRIBUTION: Wheat Ridge Water District Wheat Ridge Sanitation District West Metro Fire District Xcel Energy Century Link Comcast Cable Jefferson County School District Wheat Ridge Public Works Department Wheat Ridge Economic Development Division Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority Wheat Ridge Parks and Recreation Department Wheat Ridge Forestry Division Wheat Ridge Building Division Wheat Ridge Police Department Vicinity Map The subject property is located at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street (outlined in red in the map below). Interior lot lines will be removed and/or modified by the enclosed subdivision application. A 1 tgal t L INVHdn 44 A-.1 . 9 1 f 1 r.:- , t M .f *WADSWORTI f ,64,City of4 Wheat Nge *Aug / COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 2901 Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 January 6,2017 Mr. Dennis Sobieski Kimley-Horn 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 RE: West End 38 - 1 St review Dear Mr. Sobieski: This letter is regarding the four land use applications you submitted for the West End 38 development at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have reviewed the first submittal of the concept plan, subdivision plat, site plan, and conditional use permit; and I have the following comments. Please also refer to the enclosed redlined copy of the submittal sheets. SUBDIVISION PLAT General 1. Format plat with the following margins: 2- on left, 1" on top, and 14" on right and bottom. 2. Refer to Public Works comments and revise Sheets 3 and 4 to show existing. 3. Lot 3 should be shown as Tract A because it is not a developable area. Add a private streetscape easement to the portion of this tract that is not already encumbered by the access easement. Add a note to Sheet 2 (with the general notes) identifies the purpose of the tract: "Tract A is established for the purpose ofproviding public and emergency access, utilities, and on-site streetscape amenities." 4. For any easement being vacated, written authorization from the beneficiary will need to be provided. For any easement vacated by separate document, identify as such and provide reception number (i f available). Sheet 1: 5. Add a data table summarizing the area of each lot/tract and the total area of the subdivision. Sheet 3: 1. It does not appear that all exceptions from the title work are shown graphically, including items 18,19,22, and 25. www.ci.wheatridge.co.us CONCEPT PLAN General 1. Remove sheets 3 and 4 from the concept plan set and modify sheets 1 and 2 as follows. Sheet 1: 2. Replace all signature blocks on the cover sheet using the City provided "Concept Plan Signature Blocks" which is available on the City website and provides the required language: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/984/Concept-Plan-Review 3. Remove all general notes from the cover sheet-these are not relevant to a recorded Concept Plan. 4. Update the sheet index to reflect removal of sheets 3 and 4. 5. The concept plan will be approved after the subdivision plat is finalized, so the legal description should be a simple Lot/Block description instead of metes and bounds. 6. Add the following case numbers: WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 7. Modify the site data table as shown in the attached redlines. Because the Concept Plan is a recorded document, ranges are recommended to allow some flexibility for potential future modifications. 8. Add the following descriptive information. I have provided some text below based on the information that was provided with the application, but you may need to modify/complete these paragraphs. Character of Development The West End 38 project will be a 3.3-acre mixed use development that fully embraces the City's Main Street vision for 38th Avenue. The project will feature 155 apartment units, approximately 12,000 square feet ofretail space, structured parking, and a mix of outdoor public plazas and gathering spaces. The project will include an emphasis on green building features, residential amenities, and high quality urban design. Per Section 26-1111.C of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code, this concept plan is required in order to allow a drive-up component which is being proposed for a freestanding bank use. Phasing Plan This project will be developed as a single phase, but construction of the two proposed buildings will be phased. The smaller freestanding building will need to be completed prior to construction of the larger building. This will allow the following series o f events: Vectra Bank will remain as a tenant in the existing building on site during construction; upon completion of the smaller freestanding structure, they will move into the new building; after moving, the existing building can be demolished, and finally, the proposed multi-story mixed use building can then be constructed. Open Space Concepts Minimum open spaces requirements are proposed to be met for the development site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis. Open space and landscape plans will be provided as part of the site plan set. Drainage Concepts Drainage facilities will be provided for the development site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis. Due to the limited amount of space for above ground 10 storage and/or treatment, an underground detention vault with sand filter is proposed for the site and would be located [wherel. Zoning Compliance The property is zoned Mixed Use-Commercial and will be developed in compliance with the applicable standards of Chapter 26 0 f the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code subject to review through the site planning process. Build-to requirements (Section 26-1105.E) will be met for the site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis. Sheet 2: 9. This graphic is too detailed for a Concept Plan, the purpose of which is to establish overall development concepts. This document is not intended to duplicate the detailed site design information that is provided as part o f the site plan set. Please modify the graphic to show only the following features: • Building envelope/footprint only (remove all floorplan details) • Parking (remove counts/dimensions) • Curb/gutter • Access easement to the west • Access point arrows • General vehicular circulation • General pedestrian circulation • Street names and right-of-way widths Refer to the enclosed sketch plan which removes all floorplan details, trees, dimensions, parking counts, and paving details and shows the appropriate level of detail. 10. Add a legend. SITE PLAN Sheet 1 - Cover: 1. Correct the Owners and City certification blocks using the City provided "Cover Items" which is available on the City website and provides the required language: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/983/Site-Plan-Review 2. Remove the Clerk and Recorder certification-this document is not recorded. 3. The site plan will be approved after the subdivision plat is finalized, so the legal description should be a simple Lot/Block description instead of metes and bounds. 4. In the vicinity map, correct the spelling of"BLVD." 5. Add case history with the following case numbers: WSP-16-07, WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, and CUP-16-02 6. In the general notes, make the following modifications: • Note 2 - This should refer to West Metro Fire Protection District instead of Wheat Ridge Fire Department. • Note 5 - Remove this note. We will include provisions in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement that will allow plantings to be escrowed if COs are requested prior to June 1 (April 1 St may still be too early). 7. Break up the site statistics table so a first table addresses the whole site, and a second table addresses only Lot 1, as follows. Also refer to the comments and questions below which are referenced in bold italic text. LU Site Statistics: Existing zoning Address (Al Proposed land use Number of dwelling units Primary street [remove reference to note 14] Provided build-to (min 50% within 20') Secondary street [remove reference to note 14] Provided build-to (min 30% within 20') Lot 1 Net Area Lot 2 Net Area Tract A Net Area Total Size of Site Multifamily residential, retail, bank % /Bl % Lot 1 Statistics: Note: Refer to Sheet # for Lot 2 Statistics Icl Floor area by use ID,I Residential Retail Parking (Identify this as "garage only" or "surface and garage") Design Elements (show proposed only here, not required) Building height (6 stories/90' max) /El Building coverage Vehicle Parking #9 Required Proposed Residential: 1 - 2.5 spaces per unit #it# (sum of next 3) Standard 155 (min), 388 (max)207 in garage Compact max 20%6 in garage Accessible fG1 6 #it in garage #it in surface lot Retail: 3-7 spaces per 1,000 sq ft ##it (sum of next 3) Standard 25 (min), 58 (max)19 in garage 23 in surface lot Accessible #/1 2 ## in surface lot On-street: it# Standard ## Accessible ## Bicycle Parking Ill Required Proposed Residential: 1 space per 10 units 16 ##+ in bike storage it# in racks Retail: 1 space per 20 parking (min 4) 4 ## in racks Setbacks All Required Proposed Side 0' min 7'-7" Rear 5' min 5' A. Per the City's addressing policy, each of the two buildings will have its own address. All apartments will be assigned a unit number and the retail space will be assigned a suite number. Suite and unit numbers will be approved and assigned through the building permit process (see attached policy for guidance in assigning numbers). 1 assume that the bank will want to retain its same address (7391 W. 38th Avenue for Lot 2). The existing address at 38th and Upham is 7323 W. 38th Avenue, but this can be changed. If you prefer to change the number for Lot 1 it needs to be an odd number in the 732-, 733-, 734- range; and it cannot end in 1. B. Build-to requirements are being met for the site as a whole and should be moved to the "Site Statistics" table. For the 38th frontage, sum the retail and bank facades. For Upham, confirm that the calculation includes only the ground floor (less the garage opening and area under the bridge)--I calculate *82%. C. Replace the note regarding the Vectra Bank sheets and refer to the sheet that shows the data table for Lot 2 (this table needs to be created and I would recommend it be on sheet 8 with the Vectra site plan). D. In the "floor area by use" does the "parking" include the parking garage only or surface parking also? Add parenthesis to the table to clarify. E. How was a building height of 62' calculated? The City's definition of building height is "the vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the finished grade of the building to the highest point o f the roof surface if a flat roof [...]." With grade changes, we average the midpoints of each side, and through this method I'm calculating the building height at *54' (to the parapet). Ifthis is correct, please update the table. F. The parking counts are a bit confusing, in part because the compact and ADA parking is aggregated and itemized. Please make the changes shown in the Lot 1 table above. Also, please note that the compact and ADA requirement ratios are incorrect. In particular, the required ADA parking for the residential will need to be at least six spaces. I assume the surface parking spaces (standard and accessible) are designated for retail use. If this is incorrect, please explain. G. At least one accessible parking space must be designated in the surface parking lot for apartments (eg for prospective resident). H. It appears the closest accessible parking space for the retail building is over 250' away in the surface parking lot. The retail uses require at least two accessible spaces. On-street parking may need to be reconfigure to accommodate an accessible space in closer proximity to the building. I. It is unclear how bike parking has been provided and accounted for in the table. The table indicates that 16 spaces are provided for the residential use and 2 for the retail. Does this include the bike storage (which appears to far exceed16 spaces)? Sheet 11 (landscape plan) appears to show 3 bike racks adjacent to the retail. What is the design of these racks? If these are the standard inverted-u design that would provide 6 spaces. Please clarify what is proposed and adjust the numbers in the table accordingly. J. Setbacks can be added to the Lot 2 table. Sheet 2 - Utility Plan: 8. Are the relocated pedestals and transformers proposed to be above ground or below? If above ground, please confirm that all alternative (non street facing) locations have been explored as viable options. Sheet 3 - Erosion Control and Grading Plan: No comments from Zoning Division. Sheet 4 - Architectural Site Plan: 9. Provide a legend. 10. The north arrow has been cropped, please correct. 11. Provide all property line dimensions. These dimensions should match with the next submittal of the plat. 12. Show the adjoining lot line and access to the west which will be used by the property. See redline. 13. Along the west fagade, the fill pattern appears to indicate planters along the building, but the elevation sheets identi fy these as stoops. Please reconcile and clarify if these are patio areas or planters. See redline. 14. The trash enclosure appears to be in a relatively conspicuous location. Is there any opportunity to move it to a less visible location in this area? 15. Is the bulbed drive aisle intended as a drop off zone? See redline. Add a label to designate the intended use. 16. Refer to the attached addressing policy for guidance in labeling the apartment units (unit numbering guidelines are located in Section B.1 on page 3). As mentioned above, unit numbers will be approved and assigned through the building permit process. Sheet 5 - Garage: 17. It appears there are 85 spaces on Level 2. Please update the parking count on this sheet (the total on the cover sheet is still correct at 207). 18. Label the garage entry at the southwest corner of Level 1. 19. Modify the label to at the elevator on Level 1 to read "internal access to residential building." 20. Label the gate on level B 1 that separates the residential parking from the first 19 stalls. 21. If the first 19 spaces on Level 2 are fulfilling some of the retail parking requirement, please relabel as "visitor/retail." 22. The north arrows have been cropped, please correct. 23. Add a legend for, at a minimum, the "SC"designation and the elevation point symbol. Sheet 6 - Building Elevations: General Comments 24. Please provide a sample board for all materials on the apartments and garage. 25. The architectural detail of the elevations is difficult to read at the 1/16" scale. Please provide a few enlarged detail views-see redline for select views. 26. Please provide the north elevation retail building. 27. There are several 3-story expanses of vertical siding. What horizontal treatment is being proposed to break up the expanse? 28. What cornice treatment is being proposed at the top of the building? 29. What treatments are being proposed to break up the portions ofbrick? Will there be any reveals, sills, and/or belt courses? 30. What is the proposed finish for the cast in place concrete planters and stoops? 31. Is there a base material for the building, or is the brick proposed to extend all the way to the ground? The planters obstruct the view of the base in some areas, and in areas without planters it appears to be brick from the ground up. Please clarify. 32. The only ground floor doors that appear to be rendered as doors are the front entry to the apartment lobby. Please show all proposed doors on each elevation (see below for specific requests related to each faga(le). 33. What is the grey rectangle that appears in the rooftop of the east and west facades? See redline. If this is a rooftop equipment shelter, please label as such, identify materials, and show in all appropriate facades. 34. What is the transition between the brick and siding (between the 3rd and 4tl, floors)? 35. The trash enclosure detail is insufficient and does not seem consistent with the site plan which calls for opaque steel access doors. Provide all four elevations with specific height/width dimensions. South Elevation 36. It appears there should be three entries/doors on the south elevation (into retail 1, retail 2, and a hallway). Their locations and materials are not clearly visible on the elevation rendering. Show/label them or confirm they are seamlessly integrated into the glass storefront system as currently rendered. 37. What architectural elements will emphasize/identify the retail entries along W. 38th Avenue? 38. What are the two green panels on the west side of this elevation? See redline. They do not appear to correspond to anything on the site plan. 39. Confirm that the five ground floor apartment patio doors are the glass panels with muntins that are shown. See redline. East Elevation 40. Is the entry to the parking garage open (without a door)? 41. There appears to be some inconsistency between the site plan and the elevations relative to the widths and treatment of the five stoops on this elevation. Please clarify. 42. Based on the site plan, it appears there should be pedestrian doors visible on the east fa™le, but it does not appear these have been rendered as such. What is the material for each of these doors? 43. What is the proposed material of the transition that appears between the brick and siding at the northeast corner of the building? See redline. 44. What is the grey rectangle at the far north side of the elevation? See redline. West Elevation 45. It does not appear that the four pedestrian doors on the ground level of the west faGade are shown. 46. Is there any vertical barrier for these four patios? The site plan shows a double line in this location but the elevation appears to indicate they are open. See redline. 47. The site plan appears to indicate that a planter or stoop extends to the northern edge of the residential units, but the elevation shows otherwise. Please reconcile. See redline. North Elevation 48. Section 26-1107 requires that a parking garage be "compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of form, massing, scale, materials, and fagade articulation." The garage design is currently inadequate in terms of its compatibility. 49. It appears that the concrete barrier for Levels 1 and 2 are 36" but building codes will require a rail or barrier of at least 42" in height. Sheet 8 - Vectra Bank Site Plan: 50. Provide a legend and north arrow. 51. Provide a complete site data table for Lot 2 which mirrors the Lot 1 table provided on the cover sheet: Area by floor Proposed Level 1 SF Leve12 SF Total SF Design Elements Proposed Building height (4 stories/62' max)FT Building coverage SF / % Vehicle Parking Required Proposed Bank: 2-5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft ###(sum of next 2) Standard ##(min), ## (max) ## Accessible 1 it# On-street - ## Bicycle Parking Required Proposed Non-residential: min 4 4 ## in racks 52. The right-out curb cut is a single-lane exit and it's width need to be reduced substantially 53. The accessible parking space does not meet minimum width requirements (16') for a van accessible space and aisle. 54. The site plan and landscape plan should be consistent in terms of what areas of the site are paved versus planted. Please reconcile. 55. Provide additional detail on the proposed materials for specialty paving. 56. Show bicycle rack locations. 57. Provide the first level floorplan to help explain how the elevations relate to the interior. Sheet 9 and 10 - Vectra Exterior Elevations: General Comments 58. Please provide a sample board for all materials. 59. It does not appear that any of the facades meet the ground floor transparency requirements. Refer to Section 26-1106.D and modify designs accordingly. 60. The large expanses of brick on all facades do not meet requirements for articulation or vertical material variation. Refer to Section 26-1106 and modify accordingly. Show any reveals and/or belt courses. 61. Add shadows to convey changes in plane depth. 62. Confirm the height of rooftop equipment and if/how it will be screened. 63. Reduce the height of the trash enclosure to 6 feet or provide written justification as to why it needs to be taller. 64. Wall signs are permitted only on facades which are adjacent to a public street or major interior drive. Wall signs will be permitted to face south, east, and north. Remove the sign that faces west. A freestanding sign is permitted (max height 7 feet) and could provide a west-facing presence. East Elevation 65. Identify the material in the top right corner. See redline. South Elevation 66. The southern fa*ade is insufficient as a street facing fa™ie. As mentioned above, this fai:ade needs to meet the minimum transparency requirements through additional windows (functional or spandrel) or through a customer entrance. 00 67. This fa™le does not meet building design standards of Section 26-1106, including requirements related or articulation and color/texture changes (B.1) and requirements for vertical material variation (C.4). 68. Remove the security/utility/service door from this faGade. West Elevation 69. The lights under the canopy need to be recessed above the bottom of the canopy/fascia. Sheet 11 - Landscape Plan: 70. For the next submittal, please complete the landscape plan by showing the locations of all proposed shrubs, grasses, and perennials. Label the species of all plant material including trees. 71. Provide additional detail on the proposed materials for all specialty paving. This may be provided with a material board or spec sheets and images. 72. Provide details on the two honey locust trees that are proposed to be kept. Has an arborist been consulted to determine the age and health of the trees and the potential of surviving construction? 73. Provide additional details with elevation/detail views of the tree planters proposed as part of the streetscape. Sheet 12 - Landscape Notes: 74. For the next submittal, complete the schedule of plants with abbreviations and quantities. 75. If rock or mulch is proposed anywhere, please provide details in the plant schedule. River rock of a minimum size of 1 to 2 inches is preferred, at least 3 inches in depth over weed barrier. 76. In the site data table, change "hardscape" to "nonliving" and calculate the areas of patios/walks/courtyards (there is no required min or max). Add a row for "living" and calculate the square footage of all on-site planting areas (required minimum is 35% of the 10% = 5,067 sf). 77. Modify the required "usable" percentage to read "75%" instead of"7.5%" 78. Modify the tree counts to be whole numbers (remove decimal places). 79. Add a note to the site date table indicating "Per the West End 38 Concept Plan, minimum open spaces requirements are being met for the development site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis." Sheet 13 - Photometric Plan: 80. Combine the photometric plans (sheet 13 and 15) into a single plan. 81. For visual consistency all exterior lights on Lots 1 and 2 need to be utilizing the same kind ofbulbs. Currently Lot 1 indicates LED and Lot 2 indicates metal halide. 82. Modify the detail notes to read "Proposed fixtures are part ofthe City street lighting package..." These do not currently exist and will need to be installed by the development. 83. Add the mounting type and height to the luminaire schedule. 84. Add fixture H to the luminaire schedule. 85. It appears fixtures are missing from the front stoops on the east elevation. See redline. 86. Freestanding and/or walllights need to be added to the entry drive and courtyard which are primary circulation routes for vehicles and pedestrians. A reading of 0 foot-candles 0 in this area is unacceptable. In-ground lighting is insufficient and private wall-mounted patio lights may be turned off. See redline. 87. The southern elevation (sheet 6) shows 8 wall mounted lights, but this photometric plan shows 5 lights (fixture C) in this area. Please reconcile. See redline. 88. It appears a ground mounted light (A) is located in a planter bed at the base of the steps at Upham Street. See redline. 89. Add a light at the doors that allow a resident to enter the apartments from the parking garage. See redline. Sheet 14 - Lighting Details: 90. Remove "Existing" from the City street details. Sheet 15 - Vectra Photometric Plan: 91. Combine the photometric plans (sheet 13 and 15) into a single plan. 92. There is a foot-candie reading of 0 at the main entrance. This is unacceptable. 93. The foot-candle reading under the canopy (21.7 and 22.2) is in stark contrast to the readings of less than 1 in the approach lane. This difference needs to be reduced. 94. The lights under the canopy need to be recessed above the bottom of the canopy/fascia. 95. There appear to be symbols for two wall-mounted lights on the north elevation, but only one "Jl" label. Please clarify. 96. Confirm that fixture J is the same fixture on Lots 1 and 2. The detail image (on sheet 16) appears to be the same, but the specifications listed in each luminaire schedule are different. 97. Modify the lamps used in fixture J to be consistent with Lot 1 (needs to be LED bulbs with similar foot-candle readings on both lots). Sheet 16 - Vectra Photometric Cut Sheets: No comments CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT No comments The application was also sent on referral to other city departments and outside agencies. Attached are the comments that have been received to date. H/heat Ridge Public Works: See attached comments and redlines from Dave Brossman dated January 4, 2017. Comments regarding the traffic report will be forthcoming. Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority / Economic Development: No concerns, proposed development complies with urban renewal plan. Wheat Ridge Police Department: No concerns. Wheat Ridge Parks Department:Fees in-lieu of parkland dedication will be required for the new residential construction. Wheat Ridge Forestry Division:Comments on the landscape plan will be provided once a labelled and completed landscape plan is submitted. H/heat Ridge Building Division: No comments received. West Metro Fire District: No comments received. Jefferson Counv School District: See attached comments from Matt Hanks dated December 23,2016. H/heat Ridge Sanitation District: See attached comments and schematic from Bill Willis dated December 16,2017. Xcel Energy: See attached comments from Donna George dated January 3, 2017 and the subsequent follow-up emails from January 5,2017. Centug Link: See attached comments from Dustin Pulciani dated January 4,2017. H/heat Ridge Water District: No comments received. Comcast Cable: No comments received. This concludes the summary of comments. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me directly. For the next review, please submit the following: • a response to this letter, • one (1) full size hard copy of the plat, site plan, and concept plan, • digital .pdf files of all resubmittal documents, and • an AutoCAD file of the resubmitted plat. Sincerely, 1.aw»O Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner CC:case file 4 . e City of30VVheatR€}ge - PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner FROM:Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE:January 4,2017 SUBJECT:MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 I have completed my review for the request to allow for a mixed use redevelopment at the property located at 7391 & 7323 W. 38th Avenue, and 3845 Upham Street received on December 14,2016, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Final Plat Sheet 1 (Cover Sheet): 1. Need to provide the City-standard Owner's Certification block. 2. Unless specifically desired, the metes and bounds descriptions for the individual parcels can be removed and replaced with just the JeffCo Book & Page or Reception Number where the deed is recorded. Please note however that per Sec. 26-410 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws a metes and bounds for the overall platted boundary shall be required. The overall description shall include a tie to the section (P.O.C. and T.P.O.B.). 3. Need to include ALL owners (e.g., Vectra Bank) in the City- standard Owner's Certification block. 4. General Note #2 needs to be revised to state the accuracy is at the 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL (rather than at 90%). 5. All acreage must be shown to four (4) decimal places per City Code. 6. Include a Sheet Index (refer to the redlined plat for an example). Also, provide the sheet title on each sheet in the lower right corner (near or in title block) for convenience when readers are flipping through set. 7. The vicinity map needs to be modified to correctly show the Range Line division (Sheridan Blvd. is the Range Line between R69W and R98W) 8. The City of Wheat Ridge does not require title company certification; this can be removed. 9. In the Easement Notes: a. In Note #1: i. Add the Sheet number for the reference to "General Note 8" (i.e., SHEET 2 OF $). ii. Please replace the word "VACATED" with, "...REMOVED, West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx LJ Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 2 TERMINATED, AND EXTINGUISHED..." b. Note #4 is in need ofrevision. The Note speaks of"EASEMENTS FOR RIGHTS OF WAY" for the document recorded at Reception# 90086585. The Permanent Easement at Reception# 90086585 specifically states the purpose of the easement is for the installation and maintenance of a sidewalk, utilities, and signage. There is no mention of Right-of-Way in this document. Since Right-of-Way tends to imply conveyance of title, please revise the verbiage in Note #4 removing references to "Rights of Way" and also clarifying the document at Reception# 90086585 is in fact being an easement. c. The proposed underground detention facility shall be fully enveloped by a Stormwater Detention Easement. Please include the following Easement Note #6 with language pertaining to this easement: "6. THE STORMWATER QUALITY DETENTION AREA HEREIN SHOWN AS"STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT" SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS." d. In Note #5, please replace the words "ABANDONED AND TERMINATED" with, "...REMOVED, TERMINATED, AND EXTINGUISHED." 10.Please include a Case History box with the cases: MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP- 16-07, and CUP-16-02. 11.Please remove the two County approval blocks (Commissioner's & Public Health) as they are not needed for a plat within Wheat Ridge. 12.Include a sheet title corresponding the (yet to be created) Sheet Index. Sheet 2 (Quarter Section Breakdown): 1. Per the Municipal Code of Laws: a. All acreage must be shown to four (4) decimal places. b. The City's published coordinate values must be shown for all City monuments used/shown. c. The platted boundary shall be consistent with the Current City Datum, being a modified ground-based form of the NAD93/92 State Plane system (refer to the City's Geodetic Checklist). d. The Basis of Bearings shall be on the Current City Datum. West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 3 2. Some of the linetypes on the graphical portion do not correspond to the Legend (e.g., the aliquot linetype). 3. Monumentation information would be more clear if reorganized (see redlines). Moving the information for the S !4 Corner, Section 23 (City Mon. # 15709) into the wide open area outside of the platted boundary would also help readability. 4. In General Note #1 it is stated that the coordinate system used is NAD 83 / 2011. Please note that the plat shall be on the Current City Datum, and using the current Basis of Bearings (the S. line of the SE 14, S 23) will need to be rotated 4". 5. Please remove General Note #4. The U.S. Survey Foot is defined in General Note #1 found on Sheet 1. 6. Include a sheet title corresponding to the (yet to be created) Sheet Index. PW recommends adding the sheet title to the lower right corner. 7. Try 25' sub-units for the scale bar. Sheet 3 (Boundary Establishment): 1. Please rename this sheet to "EXISTING CONDITIONS". 2. Need to include all zoning, both on-site and for adjoining parcels. 3. The monument stamping information for the S 14 Corner Section 23 and for the SE Corner Section 23 do not match the info shown on Sheet #2. 4. Include the following items on this Sheet: a. All existing parcel lines to be removed must be clearly identified as being "PARCEL LINE HEREBY REMOVED BY THIS PLAT." b. All existing parcel lines to be retained must be clearly identified as being "PARCEL LINE TO REMAIN." c. All existing easements proposed for removal shall be clearly identified as "...EASEMENT HEREBY REMOVED, EXTINGUISHED, AND TERMINATED BY THIS PLAT." d. All existing easements to be retained must be clearly identified as being "EASEMENT TO REMAIN." 5. General comment: PW suggests removing all section information from this sheet that is shown on the Quarter Section Breakdown sheet - no need to repeat here. 6. The scale bar units are a bit strange (7.5'?) - use a more conventional approach. (Refer to the redlined plat for an example). 8. Include a sheet title corresponding the (yet to be created) Sheet Index. PW recommends adding the sheet title to the lower right corner. Sheet 4 Lot and Easement Detail: 1. Please rename this sheet to "PROPOSED CONDITIONS". PW recommends adding the sheet title to the lower right corner. 2. The following comments pertain to the 24' wide Emergency Access Easement on the west side of Lot 1 : a. PW suggests running the proposed Easement to the property line rather than leaving tiny, non-parallel gaps as it will make it far easier for future readers to understand (please refer to the redlined plat as necessary). b. PW also suggests making both the east and west sides of the proposed Easement parallel for simplicity. c. Add the text. "HEREBY GRANTED BY THIS PLAT" to all callouts for West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 4 the Easement. d. Need to add the chord bearing and chord distance for all curves in the Easement. 3. The following comments pertain to the 24' wide Public & Emergency Access and Utility Easement on the southwest portion of Lot 1 : a. Need to add the chord bearing and chord distance for all curves in the Easement. b. Add the text, "HEREBY GRANTED BY THIS PLAT" to all callouts for the Easement. c. Need to include an enlarged detail showing the relationship between the Easement & the boundary lines of Lot 2. d. All acreage shall be shown to four (4) decimal places. e. In the southwest portion of Lot 1 (where the 24' wide Public & Emergency Access and Utility Easement meets the platted boundary) the text size is too small, there is overlapping linework, and it appears there are masked text problerns. 4. Please be sure to identify any easements being granted by this plat as "xxx EASEMENT HEREBY GRANTED BY THIS PLAT." 5. At the southwest corner of Lot 1 (in ROW dedication area) the property pin text is too small and obscured by other, larger text. 6. Need to include a Stormwater Detention Easement that fully encompasses the proposed underground detention facility. Easement must be tied to the platted boundary & field locatable. 7. Identify the required Detention Easement as, "STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT HEREBY GRANTED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BY THIS PLAT. REFER TO EASEMENT NOTE #6 SHEET 1." 8. Provide a min. 10' wide Drainage Easement for the outfall pipe from the detention facility to the ROW. 9. The callout "SEE DTAIL "A" THIS PAGE" needs to be enlarged; it currently is lost among the rest of the text. 10. The following comments pertain to Detail "A": a. Show the Right-of-Way as "HEREBY DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT" in all instances. b. The Detail does not appear to correctly depict the ROW being dedicated; please refer to the redline comments on the plat. 11. Please be advised that the ROW dedication shall be sufficient along W. 38th Ave. to accommodate a functional 6' wide detached sidewalk (the 6' walk must be completely within the ROW). Please coordinate the dedication with the site designers. 12. There is an area on the easterly side of Lot 1 where there are two property pins very close together. This area may require an enlarged detail for clarity. 13. Include a sheet title corresponding the (yet to be created) Sheet Index. PW recommends adding the sheet title to the lower right corner. 14. Please note that the minimum allowable text height = 0.10". West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 5 Site Plan Sheet 1 (Cover Sheet): 1. The Legal Description for the Concept Plan must exactly match that of the Final Plat. Please note the following comment from the Final Plat Redlines: "Unless specifically desired, the metes and bounds descriptions for the individual parcels can be removed and replaced with just the JeffCo Book & Page or Reception Number where the deed is recorded. Please note however that per Sec. 26-410 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws a metes and bounds for the overall platted boundary shall be required. The overall description shall include a tie to the section (P.O.C. and T.P.O.B.)." 2. Per Sec. 26-410-C of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws the Basis of Bearings shall be on the Current City Datum,being a modified, ground-based form of the NAD83/92 (NAD83 HARN) State Plane System. The South line of the SE 91 Section 23 bears S 89°38'24" W (Current City Datum). 3. There is an extra "1" in the Benchmark info (PHAC 1). 4. General Note #6 states that an "ACCESS EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES IS HEREBY GRANTED ON AND ACROSS...." PW suggests that the Final Plat is better than the Site Plan for granting easements. Note #6 should be removed from the Site Plan (or at least modified to reference the plat) and a Note placed on the Final Plat. 5. A"STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT" must be shown over the underground detention vault area. This easement will be created by the plat to the benefit of the City. Please include the following pertinent General Note #12 on the Site Plan: "12. THE STORMWATER QUALITY DETENTION AREA HEREIN SHOWN AS 'STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT" SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. Sheet 2 (Utility Plan): 1. Please be advised that a 10' wide Drainage Easement centered on the proposed outlet pipe from the detention pond to the property line shall be required. No permanent structures shall be allowed within drainage easements, and the proposed bike storage facility will be very close to the north side of this easement. 2. The information for the storm manhole within Upham Street used to connect the outfall from the stormwater detention vault differs from what the City records show: West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 6 a. City records show the INV OUT (N) at the MH to be 30" CMP. b. City records show the INV IN (E) to be 24". 3. Only the outline o f the buildings needs to be shown on this Utility Plan - no interior elements should be visible (it just clutters up the Plan). 4. Per Sec. 26-410-C of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws the Basis of Bearings shall be on the Current City Datum, being a modified, ground-based form of the NAD83/92 (NAD83 HARN) State Plane System. The South line of the SE 14 Section 23 bears S 89°38'24" W (Current City Datum). Sheet 3 (Erosion Control and Grading Sheet): 1. Unless otherwise directed by the City Planning staff, PW recommends removing the EC & Grading Plan from the Concept Plan set Sheet 4 (Architectural Site Plan): 1. Please note that the sidewalk (both attached and detached) along Upham Street shall be a minimum of 6.0' in width. The sidewalk that is shown on this sheet appears to be only 5'. 2. Need 6.0' min. functional sidewalk width along W. 38th Ave. to lie within the dedicated ROW. Please adjust ROW dedication on Final Plat as needed to accommodate this. 3. Need the ROW dedication widened at and near the intersection to allow for the City sidewalk to lie within the ROW.(for future maintenance purposes). There are some planters on both the Upham Street and the W. 38th Avenue frontages that narrow the sidewalk width to less than the required 6', so the ROW dedication willlikely need to be increased at the intersection to accommodate this. Concept Plan Sheet 1 (Cover Sheet): 1. The Legal Description for the Concept Plan must exactly match that o f the Final Plat. Please note the following comment from the Final Plat Redlines: "Unless specifically desired, the metes and bounds descriptions for the individual parcels can be removed and replaced with just the JeffCo Book & Page or Reception Number where the deed is recorded. Please note however that per Sec. 26-410 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws a metes and bounds for the overall platted boundary shall be required. The overall description shall include a tie to the section (P.O.C. and T.P.O.B.)." 2. Per Sec. 26-410-C of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws the Basis of Bearings shall be on the Current City Datum,being a modified, ground-based form of the NAD83/92 (NAD83 HARN) State Plane System. The South line of the SE 14 Section 23 bears S 89°38'24" W (Current City Datum) 3. There is an extra "1" in the Benchmark info (PHAC 1). Sheet 3 (Erosion Control and Grading Sheet): 1. Unless otherwise directed by the City Planning staff, PW recommends removing the EC & Grading Plan from the Concept Plan set. West End 38 Plat-CP-SDI' Review-1.docx Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 7 CIVIL ENGINEERNING Preliminary Drainage Report 1. In order for the City to approve a detention design that utilizes a sand filter in an underground setting (with no infiltration), field test performance data must be provided in the Report demonstrating the proposed WQ system meets the median TSS effluent concentration of 30mg/L per UDFCD criteria. If this cannot be accomplished then PW recommends utilizing a WQ device that has been independently (field) tested and is known to meet that criteria, such as a Contech Vortechs® chamber system or CDS® hydrodynamic separator. If a Contech or other proprietary WQ device meeting the UDFCD criteria is used upstream of the detention vault, the volume o f the system can be reduced to only the 100-year (no WQCV will be required). It also appears that the sand filter system as proposed could prove to be very difficult to maintain. The Vortechs® system has a known and trusted maintenance procedure. There may be are other WQ products from Rinker (e.g., Stormceptor) and possibly Oldcastle that will perform satisfactorily. Be sure and check with the fire district to verify loading requirements for all underground detention facilities. 2. The water quality component will need to be on the east side of the detention facility due to the fact that no matter what the design is or what proprietary product is chosen, the system will need to be serviced by a Vactor/jet rodder to adequately clean the WQ component. Given the size ofthejet rodding equipment required for maintenance, you're not going to want to construct the parking garage to accommodate the 14' height of such a vehicle. PW also suggests placing the maintenance manholes/access points as close to the opening of the garage as possible so that maybe the Vactor won't need to go fully into the garage to perform the needed maintenance. Moving the WQ system to the east also means the incoming flow will need to be routed to the east side as well. 3. If a proprietary WQ device is placed upstream of the proposed detention vault, only the 100-year volume is needed (no WQCV will be required). 4. Due to long-term maintenance concerns for the parking structure (driving surface), PW recommends the floor o f the parking structure be poured separately from the top o f the detention facility (don't construct them as monolithic). The detention facility should be constructed as a stand-alone vault system. Traffic Impact Study 1. Mark Westberg, P.E. is addressing the traffic comments and will be returning comments at a later date under separate cover. West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 8 OTHER PROJECT REOUIREMENTS: 1. CDPS Permit & Stormwater Management Plan: This site in general is greater than one acre in size and the area of disturbance will meet or exceed one (1) acre, so a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) associated with the required State CDPS Permit shall be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge for review and approval. The SWMP must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any Demolition, Grading, ROW Construction, or Building Permits. The CDPS Permit is generally obtained from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment by the contractor at time of Building Permit Application. A copy of the CDPS must accompany the final submittal of the SWMP. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for further information). It is highly recommended that the SWMP be submitted as soon as possible to avoid delays in the issuance of required Permits. 2. Drainage Certification/ As-Built Plans/ SMA and O&M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: Upon completion ofthe drainage improvements, the Engineer-of-Record shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter (DCL) stating that the overall site grading was completed per the approved Grading and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed per the approved construction plans and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The DCL shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As-Built Plans on the Current City Datum for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. b. As-Built Plans: The following items shall be included in the As-Built Plan prior to City acceptance: i. Storm Sewer (this info referenced in DCL) 1. Detention/WQ pond volume (sufficient spot elevations for engineer to calculate the volume). 2. Detention/WQ pond Outlet Structure elevations. 3. Manholes, rim and invert elevations. 4. Drop Inlets, grate and invert elevations. ii. Lighting (within Public ROW only) 1. Streetlight locations. 2. Pedestrian light locations. 3. Pull Box locations. 4. Electric meter location(s). Three (3) copies of the "As-Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx Public Works Engineering January 4, 2017 Page 9 i. One (1) hardcopy is to be signed & sealed on 24" X 36" bond paper, and ii. Two (2) electronic files are to be delivered on DVD/CD-ROM as follows: One (1) file in AutoCAD 2015 DWG or older format, and one ( 1) file in PDF format (o f the signed & sealed sheets). c. Stormwater Maintenance Agreement and O&M Plan: All post- construction Best Management Practices (BMP's) for water quality must be maintained and inspected by the property owner(s) per Section 20-34 of the City o f Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws. For stormwater quality facilities including, but not limited to, above-ground or underground detention facilities, porous landscape detention areas, porous pavement, centrifuge type devices such as a Rinker Stormeepter®, hydrodynamic separation systems such as a Contech Vortechs®, or for any other approved post-construction BMP, a Stormwater Maintenance Agreement accompanied by an Operations and Maintenance (O & M) Schedule/Log shall be required prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. The O&M Schedule/Log must be kept current and will be inspected on a regular basis by City staff to ensure compliance with City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Code requirements. Please contact Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager at 303.235.2871 for additional information. 3. PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING: A minimum of ten (10) days prior to commencement of any construction activities, the General Contractor shall schedule a Pre-Construction Meeting. Contact Russ Higgins, Field Services Supervisor at 303.235.2861. Be advised that no Right-of-Way Construction or Building Permits will be issued until this meeting has been held. 4. Information pertaining to the Public Works development requirements, Site Drainage Requirements, the City's Street Construction Standards & Details in AutoCAD® DWG format, ROW maps, and City-based coordinate and land surveying information (i.e., Current City Datum), is all available on the Public Works, Development Review page of the City of Wheat Ridge website at: www.ci.wheatridge.co.us West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP Review-1.docx Ihi. Legal De·nrl,rn mu exkll¥ inat£h lli(af¢hc F,n PI Plehe r,te lhe roilowingcnlul,en[ from/e l'mal PI•t Rdi,ne Unle. ipecifically drt,red. the * it,ele-.1 bll,Id. descr,r¢,on, 101 the * lw.I *el can be re,nove,1 ™1 reples,1 11, luil the ..0 * k & 1•ge or Receplwn Nagnbet where * eed b re,Dolded Pica,e nole hourve. tha peF Sec 26-1 lo orthe Whe/ !g Mun.I. 1 Co'* of 1-,Wh . D¢1,1ndb*1Mt£aUx .i 'all ./ $1 The ....11 de,er,pllon §11,11 Inch,dr I . 10. bert- (PIC and TrOH ' WEST END 38 SITE PLAN ElliELIiall Re Paae. LLC 0Lm R.*a.61,0/-/15/W//A'*a '.:1= 1175 1550 Wy,mop SDeet Su 100 2100 Brel.t-od Set Contact Palkeoblm Coflact T..Slon. De-fiC/80202 Denver. CO 80202 L.4, CO 80214 770420166B 303436.9551 303.919.9343 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO OWNERS SIGNATURES 2..... K,r,440,n and A-clate, In= Cortmct......... Den,er CO 0C237 3032*t2300 BASIS OF BEARING OBSERVAIIONSANDAREBANE 20,4.0!AD*3 2Dllk.ONG. TOWNSH.'SOU™.RAN./69 WEST.BETWEEN™EMONUME BENCH MARK: CrT-YOFWHEATRIDGE,PHAC, RECOVEREDAOS·ALUMINUMI LESSSOUTHOF.29™AVEAI ELEV=5471.62*-88) ......... ANe C-*Gi, LLC Coritact 1.larcLe V8Mllna 11990...Shet...0 6--733 4 EGRIDBEARING. DEED ESOU·THERLYUNEOFTHE <I, S™ PR... MER 4TSSHOV/'HEREPI. )4'/el...... e ./. Pe. Sec 264'0€of thecatRId. Muni'Ii-u . / ws Ehe I Ii of Be-10% ,h,11 b¢ pn Ihe ./mali F { in· Dan,m, emg a mndined. gr™nd·based for,n okhe NA[)8192(NADHARNJSulcm=S¥,lern I WHI R·94/(-m·nlrin·EU-'I 3 CO VICINITY I E FROMR™FASTITATK:/PS Il SOUrHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23 EMAN, WHICH BEAI SOUrH 09'38'20- · I -.PHI 1 ) /4//line be. OD IN THE LAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CrrY HALL. 150 MORE OR 4D 530 MORE OR LESS EASr OF WADSWOR™ BLVD. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING: 1 iii > e e SHEET INDEX: ./.A.SHT 'OF' covERSHEEr 1 SHEET 2OF,4 UllrrrPLANSHEET 'OF' EROSIONCONTROLANOGRAOrIGPLAN SHEEr 43,10 ARCI,rECTURALS,TEPLAN SHr 'OF' OVERALLGARAGEPLANSL81-02 SHEET 6 OF 16 .7ERICRELEVATIONS 5 SHEET 7 OF,6 5<TERIOR EL// ONS SHEET 'OF" (VECTRABANK).rEPLAN SHEET .OF' 0€CTRABAN'EXTER,CREEVATIONS SHEET 10 OF 16 OVECTRABANK) strEmOR.e,fATIONS SHEEr 12 OF' LANDSCAPE NOTES NDOS SHEET 13 OF 16 PHOTOMETRIC FUN SHET 14 OF / UGHTING .... SH 15 OF,6 0,ECTRABNIPWOTOMErRICPLAN SHEET 16 OF 16 (VECTRA BNK) PHOTOMETRIC LIGH™K; CUT.HEETS MAPCE PRo,EcTG,TE 1 (we)' the undersigned. shall comply with all regulations contained in the Wheat Ridge Zoning Code of the City and County of Wheat Ridge. The following signatures constitute all owners of land and structures included in this plan· West End 38.LLC BY Tyler Downs, Owner Date State of Colorado City and County of Wheat Ridge SHEARSADIONSROCKMMOREHASPREPAREDTHISSITESUBMITTALFORWESTEN. 38. TO™E BEST OF ouR KNOVA-EDGE THE PROPOSED SUE DESIGN IS INCOMPUANCE WITH THE REOU,REMENTS OF THE lue ZON»,6 AND THE AppucABLE PRovisioNs 1.EGAL DESCRIPTION: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day 01 SITE STATISTICS: NOTE PLEASEREFERENCEPAGES'.10 ANDI. SUSTINGZONG PROPOSED'ANDUSE NUMBER OFDWELL#40.!CS PRIMARYSTREET (SEENC,rE. SIDESTREET{SEENO.14) TOTALAREA LOT " lOT,2 LaT,3 ADORAREAB'r USE RESENT,AL RETAIL PARK.. DESIGN .... BULDINe HaGHT (MAX) BULOINGCOVERAGE PARK»10 RESIT... 1 SPACE'UN'll), 15/UNI (MAX) RETAIL 3 SPACES / 1,000 SQ FT / 7..000 so FT MAX) ACCESSIBLEPARKING SPACES 294 MIN COMPACTSPACES 10%MAXALLOWED TOTAL BICYULE {RES,DENTIAL, 1 SPACE i .VINTS BICYCLE (RETAIL} 1 SPACE / 20 PARKG SPACES PROPOSED USES AND COMPLIANCE NOTE PLSEREFERENCEPAGES 8-10 AN.15*IGFOR' SETBACK' SIDESETBACK(MIN) REAR SETBACK{MIN} BURD-TO TOTAL BUIL.TO PRIMARY 5TREET (MIN I N™IN .*AX) (REFER TOSHEET 40»; 16) 14 FOR .CTRA BANK GITEINFORMATION MU-C MIXED USE COMMERCIAL 155 W. 38™ AVE UPHAMST. [ACRES,G FT] GROSS (*cmerse FT] NET 2.873 ACRES/125.166 SQ FT 2.873 ACRE/125,166 m FT 0.223 ACRES/9.732 SQ FT 0.223 ACRESI,732 SQ FT 0.227 ACRES/9.874 SQ FT 0.227 ACRES/9.874 SQ FT 172.856 SQ FT 8.251 SQ FT 51,316 SQ FT RE'RED PROPOSED 6 STORIES 107 4 STORIES (531 41,505 GSF REQUIRE -0ID60 155(MIN) 388(MAX'217 SPACES 25{M. 58.AX,44 SPACES 5 SPACES (MIN'.SPACES 28SPACES(MAX)8 SPACES 28'SPACES .SPACES 16 SPCEl 2 SPACES 2 SPACES VITH ZONING: DTRAeANKmTEINFORMAnON PW ugges[, Ihe Fin,1 P. REQU-D PROVIED ............ for gr# caw.neal, 7-7 Note #6 -#re™ved 5 and pled,m Ihe PI,t REQUEREC)PRO/'ED 601WmIN 52,6 V.HIN ..2(7 .a PARCEL ONE A.D. 2016 by ™E SOUTHWEST QUARTER fF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF ™E SOUTHWEST OUARTER OF ™E SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC·,101,123, TOWNS,«P'SOUTH RANGE.WESTOF™E«™P.M.,EXCEFT™EVWEI'.FEETTHERECIANDEXCEPTTHENOR™85..OFTHEEAST 175 FEEr OF THE Soun·MEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE Solr™WE....TEROF™. sou™EAST QUARTER OFS,No WRness by hand and offical seal SECTe,23 ANC,FURT....GTHATPOR™>N IS DEED......0. WHEATRIDGE' DEEDRECORDEDOCTOBE. 8 199DAT My Commission ExpiresRECEP™»I NO. 90086571, COUN™ OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. PARCELTWO ™E * 5 FEEr OF THEEAST 175 FEET OF™E sounM,E5r©NBOUARTER OF ™E soun,EA 0,16-guARTER oF™E SOU™WEST ONE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAm ONE QUARIER (al,1 » SE I Sr y. SE,%) OF SECTION 23 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUr. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6™ P.M.. COW™OFJEFFERSON STATEOFCOLORADO. PARCEL™REE LOT 1, E..... SUBDIVISICN RECORDED JANUARY 4 20/ AT RECEMION NO 2010000090, COUNPY O. JEFFERSON STATE OF COLORADO. PARCELFOUR{A) A PART OF THE SOU™EASrONEOUARTER OF SECTION 23, TCAVNS,IP 3 SOUTH, RANGE€9 WEST OF™E €™ PRDICIPAL MER=. COUNrroF JEFFERSON.STATEOFCOLORADO MOREPARTICULARLlc]ESCRIBED•,SFLOWS 0EGINNINGATAPOIT30.00.EENORTHERLYAN[)526.40 FEET EASTERL¥OF THE SOLmMEST CORNER OF SAIDS©UTHEAST 0,150UARIER, ™ENCE NOR™ERLY, PARALUEL WrTH THE WEST UNE OF SAI} SOUTH EAST ONE·QUAR TER A DISTANCE OF,21.15 FEET. ™ENCE ON AN ANGLE TO™E RIGIC OF 89 DEGREES,15 MINUTES 00 SECONDS SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE D AiaNG A UNE PARA,LEL wrrH THE sov™ LI,Eof= SAID souTHEAST ONEQUARTER I CISTANCEOF iii. FEET; ™ENCE ON AN AN(*E To ™E RIGHr OF 90 DEGREES 13 MNUTES 37 SECCNDS A DISTANCE OF,21.16 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FaEr NOR™ERLY OF ™E SAID SOUTH LNE 0™E sou™EAST ONBouARTER, 1-He,c,zoN AN ANGLE To THE RIG-oF. c,EGREEs . * ES 23 SEcoloS .10.ONG A UNE OF 30.00 FEET NOR™ERLY OF AND PARALLEL TOTHE SAID SOUTH UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET TOTHE POINr 1, Rob D. Snodgrass, a registered land surveyor in the state of Colorado, do hereby certify that theOF BEGINNNG.survey for the West End 38 Site Plan was made under my supervision and the accompanying plan SAVE AND EX/0T ™AT PORTION OF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LAND CONVEYED TO ™EAMERICAN OL COMPANY ON ™E 21ST DAY CF MARCH.accurately and propew shows said survey. A PART OF ™E solm+EAST >% OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 souTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6™ PR K PAL MER,01*,1. ¥08. PART,CULARLY DESCEDFOLLOWS BEGINING AT . PO»IT 30 00 FEET NOR™EF'Y AND 526.40 FEET EASTE.¥ OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAD SOUTHEUT K ™ENCENORTHERcf, PARALiE WITH THE ViEST L»tE OF SA SOUTHEAST . A DISTANCE OF 100.0 FEEL Rob D. Snodgrass. PLS #36580 THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT O F 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A LME PARALLEL WrrH™E SWTH LNE OF SAO SOW™EAST /4, A DISTANCE OF 131.79 FEET THENCEON AN ANGLETOTHE RIGHT 0/ 90 DEGREES 13 ./ ES 37 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 10. Flm·T TO A Fo ll 30.00 FEET NORIMERLY OF™E SOUTH UNE OF THE SOV™EAST I THENCEON AN ANGLE TO™E RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS ANO . A LINE OF 30. FEET NOR™ERLY OF AND PARAUEL TO THE SOUTH UNEOF THE SOUTHEAST . A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET To™E PARCEL OF LAND, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON 5LATE OF COLORADO.APPROVALS SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF ™E ABOVE-DESCIBED LAND DESCRIED .SPARCEL FOUR I) AS FOLLOWS PARCELFOUR. Ip,i.RCE-OFLANDLOCATED,1™Esov™EASTONE-ouARTEROFSECTION. TowlisHIP'SouTHRANGE...0,=THE™PRINCIPAL Approved by IAERID-1. COUNr, OF JEFFERSON, STATE OFCOLORADO. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWSBEGIN-103 AT A Po,rt 30.00 FEEr NORTHERLY AND 45.00 FEET EAST-aU¥ OF THE SC*rr,M,EST CORNER or SAID SOUTHEAST ONSCUARTet.For the Zoning Administrator Date WHICH POINT ls™E sou™WEST CORNER OF BLOCK l. PARK Kop au80!VISION AR5T AMEND/ENT. THENCE EAST ALONS ™E sov™ unE of= SAID BLOCK l. 30.00 FEEr NOR™ OF AND PARALLEL WITH ™E Sounl LINE OF SND SOUTHEAST ONE-QUART- A DISTANCE OF •181.40 FEET To THE MOST SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAK} BLOCK L ™ENCE NORTHERLYALONG THEEAST UNE OF SAID .OCKi. PARALLEL VmH THE Approved by WEEr, LINE OF SA SOUrHEAST ONSQUARTER. A DISTANCEOF 306.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNNIG, THENCE CONTINUNG NORTHERLY. ALONG S.,0 EASTERL¥ LINE AND PARALLEL .....D WEST '» E, A DISTANCE OF 1..00 FEET To AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID Forthe Manager of Community Date 8LOCK 1, THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO ™E RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 11!hUTES CD 8ECONDS AI ALONO AN EASTERLY UNE OF SAID BLOCK 1 /1, PARALLa ¥mH™Esou™ JIEOFSAR> SOUTHEAST= A DISTANCEOF 131.65 FEET TO AN EASTERLYCORNER OP SAID BLOCK 1.Planning and Development THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO™E RIG. OF 90/EGREES 13 yINVrES 37 SECONDS. A 015.NCE OF 115.00 FEEL THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO ™E RIGHr OF 90 DEGREES 46 INUTES 23 SECONDS AND PAR/la .nl THE SOUTH UNE OF SAID SOUTHEA ONE·QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 13.OFEEL, MOREORLESS TOTHETRUEPON. OFBEGINI«NG. PARCELFT.'E THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE SWV, SE,M SWIM SE™ OF SECTION 23. Tov18 42 3 SOUTH. RANGE . WEST OF THE GTH P.M., EXCg'T THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATIONSOUTH 30.00FEETTHU,60F FOR NORTH .TH IVENUE COU,er OF JEFVERSON* STATIOFCOLORADO. GENERAL NOTES: State of Colorado 1. ANGLES NOT INDIATED OTHERWISE ARE EITHER 90 DEGREES OR A SUPPLEMENT OF THE ANGLE City and County of Wheat Ridge DESCRIBED. 2. PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRIVES SHALL BE POSTED WITH ¥-IRE LANE· SINS AS REQUIRED BY THE WHEAT RIDGE FIRE DEPARTMENT.I hereby certify that this instrument was filed for record in my office3. PARKING SPACES FOR PERSONS WTTH DISABILmES SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED WITH UPRIGHT SIGNS. 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTrTUTE OR IMPLY COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH at-o'clock m 20-. DISABILITIES ACT REQUIREMENTS. 5. THE SITE SHALL BE LANDSCAPED DUING THE GROWING SEASON OF APRIL 1ST TO OCTOBER 1ST.Reception # AN AGGES&,EABEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES IS HEREBY GRANTED ON AND ACROSS ALL AREAS FOR POLICE, FIRE. MEDICAL AND OTHER EMERGENCY VEHICLES FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. 7. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED VITH AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC r.lirk Inrl Rvirr•r, PY.Officio Clerk of City and County of Wheat RidgeIRRIGATION SYSTEM. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL bt= m/lua l tu t r I be:/4 ins I inm .ATER DE n NTION EASEMEN'r mu,1 he thown „wi ihSOO/GRASS: THIS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS PLANTED IN SOO/GRASq,migni dienam,aul, anc 1hl, ca»c,mnnvill k <r„led b, ihc rbi i„ iht 8. BICYCLE PARKING RACKS WTHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM 74.·*flhce,h 11™cmclud,acfoll,mirrnnell, N,Ic-thcSllelln .Deputy 9. PRIVATE ROADWAYS ARE NON-DEDICATED STREETS AND WILL Ne- -..L F SS TOTAL .OILD·TO SECONDARY STFRI/MIN 96 30....899, -THIN ¥,,THINMIUMAX)c.-20 .43 Kimley»Horn SA+R WAZEEPARTNERS SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE CtTY AND COUNTY OF WHEAT RIDGE. 10.THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMONLY ACCESSED EASEMENT IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. 11.THIS SITE PLAN IS SUBJECT TO A LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THIS DOCUMENT. ... STOR'. • Il l 01 A[ 1. 1 / Il' -110>. AR] 4k ! {1 R.N S] 1( iWN AS ST( ,]t//r'11...1·\1[IN ...0NI- SUALL BE CONSTRI A ' 1., ANT] MA INT $,9 1,3 11' ( 3 ··1 P AND SUBIT.QUENT OUNERS. 1 n-IRS. S CCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN T. EVENT IN VI 'rliCONSTRVEIP ··· 'M I /,191 ·· th,CF ]'. ./ PERFORMED BY .,4,11 J OUNER. 11{. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE Sl,All. H,4 THU RIGH] T, il [! .. .11.1 , INDrl 10{,RM NaliSSARr /'t,Rk. 111, COSTOF Ull,Cll S.[D OWNkil HEIRS il •-Cli';OR% ,I) W,Il, >, 'kOR}}.STr,P•. 9) Btll.DINGUR STR"CIVRE WILI, BECONS™1€TF.D . rim n•-11-Nrl€»• 'dt· Val ¥, c 11% ·...%,I ./ TERAT1€.S AF[*€·11NO THE HY[,Ril 'LlC (·11.Alt.{-!IRISTICS (* T] {F UN!·NroN .ARL A ./1 BI- 1,1.,[* UT. 14), -T THE, APPROVAL OF T {F. INRECTOR OF P-B[ IC WORKS Fee. CITY OF ¥HEAT RIDGE PUBLICWORKS DATE 12/14/2016 RECEIVED 12/14/2016 1 Submittal ISSUED: 12/09/2016 COVER SHEET SHEET 01 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 2.05:21 PCAUse/yemhollocuments\1671 3801 & Upham -Central 2017/emhof.,vtx)9'Mite Plan d.vg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 1,.cheadvi,edlIi IO+vuu [*airge lia,en,1,nlcd- . „0„0.,d *./.*m the .ent,{in ...... reted le„ st'.re, le /10/ed wilhin d.-ols. n,] the....tke $1-ge ./.*. very.lmet.. i,flh I.L· i.f Ihi ./.Trnt A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 0¥ **v the ./Lill 10 be'-Ch/ | £*5%.... 51; MALL EX fER F Opnt m.; 1 /81 SNaTE, 1 T UPROPERTY ./ EX SANITARY MNKXLE r .'tr,p*(50)EX SAN ARy./ROLE W¥ 010 r P (NE)-13427.4)F R-•454.5.9,1 *. r M= (SW)-(5*216} U /70210 NETr RI'l-(5*35.8,}.v a, tr.- i \ In: ,r . 329.1 389'38'I.L.. lpoPERTY LINE ... PROP=f= pRm JUNMON /.1- ll--1-t-lt J 111 PROPOD DENION VAULT 1-PROPOSED 10 S*MTARY f EX IMRTAR' . . PROPOSED f st•ER r,2mAN...ER 1 Ot Sl[.' Will a•!E-(54315; -Il¥ OUT W RCP (N)-(5*3&2) INV N 24 "P {S)-{93&4) ./.'a ll {1€)•(.30.4) / ---112286-NQIQ CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOUTON OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING UntlnES SER,ING THE STRUCURE. UTUnES ARE TO BE REMOVED TO ™E RIGHT-OF-WAI 2. ™E CON'ACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED ™AT THE LOCAION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISnNG Ul,UnES AS SHIN ON THESE PLAN5 IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UT,UTY COMPANIES, AND VAIERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE wir,7.•r FIS.D. IHE NFORIAION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. ™E 04 r«ord, s- Ihe CON™ACIOR IAST CALL TI'E APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS INVa.*Elti,bel"BEFORE ANY ED(CAVAnON TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF U.U.E. IT SHALL- BEE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CON™ACTOR TO RELOCAI ALL EX,SlING Ul,UnES ¥041CH CONFUCT NITH ™E PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS 3. WATER UNES ARE ASSUWED TO HAVE 4.5' OF COVER AT CROSSINGS. 4. ALL E.ST,NG DRY Um.InES HA,€ 0EEN ASS'WED .. 5 DEEP AT CROSSING LOCAIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOnFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS 5. CONTRACTOR TO Fla-D VERIFY DEP™ AN' LOCATION OF ALL EX,511NG UnLITES PRIOR TO CONS.UCTION AND SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS. EX .....ANHOLE .,u. xwt* TO . ...D R•(5*315)WNN (rm) 01') i r TO UNDERGROUND DETENTION 11 1NV OUT Ir K» FM5422.711 VAULT; RE: I. NS H I 0. F ely ' " VO' f»(9215)al % . · :1. / *Al IN r PVC (E»(54.*}STOF•(n€\PROPOD -,0,0/ I g- VCP t»....3) 2---t F - , 1 UNDERGROUND / -- POWER PROP. y DC)MESnCLN89.„ Er--% O - .7= L==15... ...j 131./7"-wATER SERVICE FROW 2 .TER / MANHOLE ('1¥M 'ENTRY ROOMI -PROP. 6. FnE SERVICE FROW INERT IN TOINERT OUT. ; 10. ALL STORW STRUCTURES SHALL HA. A 9.100™ UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INAERT, -S.97 e L 15 ROPOSED ROW EX. W ... (r,P) 1 .TYPE-R INUET r .......TOR TO FLUSH AND VACUUM ENTIRE 0.-SITE STOR'WATER SYSTEM UPON - COMPLE'ON OF PROPOSED ./. 11 1 SO//04/12. AU PVC TO BE SOR-33, POOL IREA DESIGNED I 400.4 LANDSCAPE; RE: · MEP/LANDSCAPE PLANS J r1 2 I r, Ir. 1 11 | LA.I .fl ,Z NULE.1 1 .31,ly theoullme.lhe huildmgs need,EX ©UnET S'/KI'l r *. .he 41*-,MIS /11 P. · npal.(543&7>r-- f- m ....lemem; 5hould be vi&,bl.NV OUT W "P 91»(54312)PROPERTY 7 iu.*.suplhe PI-, L -410- 3 L,-tru A L,1,i,p RELOC•1-DI ./G. (I.) PRCF. C OT .' l_43 |p.1-1--21.12arT--ii--at ==¥-Z+-3 1-7. .' 7 -4... 1 \ =»i lit]¤Ik .»*.9 1- flip) |Re....mn-* Slice'll LAJ PROP. STORM lili 1, 1 / PROP. GASil ,©LE (r,P) -Ratel&:f 1 1. S'C- E .I n.A•6' . P*5*3il)PRCPOSe F./1 LPROP. STORM (1NP)---I-'F la tr·m 'HYDRANT S89'38117.-1. - -JHEB*§IS oF BEARINGSr,PE 13 »R.ET <.ARINGS SHO- HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM In< FAST Xf - / STATIC GPS ./RVATIONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO I -/.EY GAS .1--E-,1 . l (1 LPROP. 2. 00.€Sne WATER COORDINATE SYSTEW OF 1983 CENTRAL ZIE (NAD 83, 20„), ALONG ™E j ST'nON AND SERMCE FROM 1.: hETER \..SOURERLY UF€ C]F IHE SOU™EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOINSHIP 3,- 18.9 ' IQVTH. RANGE 09 VEST. 6™ PRINCPAL WERDIAN. MICH BEARS SOU™/' NDi 2·07-W IU PROP. 4 89·320.-SIL_MTME....NUk€ITS SH WN HERE»1-THYDRANT 1 . *Ca mANSFORW. ·4 U ·W* 4 BENCHMARK: C,Tr OF WHEAT RIDGE IPHACI 111TO . RELOCATED 7 -8-cilL -FTE-I--7.1-1-frSiJIF 4 LJ 11 1 RECOVERED A ly ALUMINU. ROD IN Tl€ .- OF THE mIEAT RIDGE CITY PROPOSED ROW-EX SlREET U'HY EAST OF WAD.OR™ ... HALL 130' MORE OR LESS SOU™ OF W 29™ A. AND 53(y MORE OR LESS RED'EP PLANS Ik r. s- Ex. STORM INLET1cAM-. - -Ji Wi i OL FIRE HaANT ELEVATION - &471.62 (NA. 88) -111 -ly EX S•JaIN?Y W.M.H. RN-(5•415)0. &4S me,.v oui ir,i,p fr>-f93*W 38TH AIENUE Z. AS 78'7 11,17ER ..F.a22x W¥ 21 - O .-{&423}PROP. : /NORTH'- '- -p m.·m-ug,1 4 ..ZA, *WU.f L. . 4·jA.-(54*29} 6. DOSTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT To REMOK ALL SiT ANC} DEBRIS. 7. ALL STORM PIPE ENNRNG SRUCIRES SHALL BE GROUal TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCm,RE I WATERTIGHT. I. ALL STORM SEWER .ANHOLES IN PA'.ED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH 'TH PAVEMENT, ./ SHALL HA. TRAFFIC BEARING RING a CO,ERS. UDS SHALL BE LABELED STORM SEWE'. I. CONSTRUCTION SHAU. COMPLY n,TH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONS™ICTED TO SAME. 4 4 STORM. (r.)JI 1 L f 1 Im r 1* n ROP- 0ER AND_17-' a !7 S..'.)- F ./CUT....%-{543¢.9)EX. - S'[8 mE7»NV N € RCP 94-(143&1} ' TE' ir SHIM (TIP L,:t te. SAm,Fr I.R (11P) •. 1 001.elll .Ifs. Ek SA•ARY ¥i•NHOLE F-(5«0.1) 21¥ OUT tr P (E)••(543&8) */ # t, fl)·454*16).v », r v., rs)-m·„i.u EX SIOIL--A Ny 01:r •r RCP (0-(54310 *WIN 48* Pt {•1)-{5035) tX ,8- 570,4 0"1 ' EX SlURN .$ ......5437+1)1»¥ CUT. R. 01)•(54340)*¥. 17· P.fs.k•fs¢3*U EX- ..ARY 'A-OUE F-•(5437.•) L »4¥ OUT 17 0 {N>(542/1) NV . tr V. 0,)-929.2} WY. I '0 (E)=(542Rn GRAPHIC SCALE / FEET 01530 60 ISSUED: 12/09/2016 Kimley>*Horn SA+R WAZEE UTILITY PLAN 9'|EMRADINsROI*• 0,SHEET 2 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 424 01 PM K \DEN_CM \096331 009_WestEnd38\CADD\Construclion\Site Plan\0963 009UT.Ng WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO r J r.F .r 1 SCL MTC) 02!1 (AA 92¥j PROPOSED CONTOURS L.UTS OF CONSTRUCTION N89'38'44'E304.1 PFOPERTY UNE E,OSTING CONTOURS :74':-e»ICE/ VEHICLE mACKING CONTROL. INLET PROIECnON L.MTS OF CONSTRUCTION riEHEE SEINENT CONrrROL LOG NO·12·07-* 114.y F W. 27 N89·3820E 131.81 \ FPROP- UNE 1 cr T FENCE C0NSTRUC1I0N FENCE FFE-5435,339=C-1 ,51*UnD STAING AREA CONCRE·/ WASHOUT ./EA / 01 P iEl Ef' t- SS 'b : 52 - · 1.2=ma - t.t'1 f'h,1 204-t STREET SWEEPING • ™E CON'RACTOR ./. USE ROCK SOCK' ....T CONTROL LOGS, ....CE OR DAMOY RE'Ya-ER EAGS FOR PERIMETU, /,0 INTERN,£ CONTROLS 'ASED ONSTE CONDITIONS. T,eS CONTROL SHALL . PLACED AT nE DO-S™EAM END OF STREET5 USED FOR "FRIAL STORATE OR HANDLING. AND AT ALL DRIVEWAY CUTS FOR SITE ACCESS. 9£/EAL-/21£2 In 1 1 ™E CONTRACTOR SHAL MAINTAIN ADJACENT STREET5/DRI.€S TO BE FREE OFjpy 1 ;L- - - 4*1 LMTS OF CONSTRUCTION ADJACENT PROPERTY 0-ERS· AT A WINIUl. SmEET S'EEPING SHALL TAKE SECM=ENT AND DEBRIS. SET SwEEPING SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON AN INTERAITINT BBS AS NEEDED TO CONTROL- ./•ENT OR AS REK»RED BY ™E PLACE ON A DAILY BASIS .... COMPLE'ON OF ™AT .... CONSTRUCTIC»4 --r-- I rl I 1· i --·'F-r J ...*El + ' i ACTIMTIES4.AL_LA.,1-4--1-J 2 REFER TO THE /11/Tr PLAN FOR LOCATION OF Au E)OST»NG UnUTIES 39.89 -·--r-•r- T -lrl-·-r-'T-1,--r--r--1 --7--).·Itku=A 3. STAm/ZED STAGING AREA AND CONCRETE WA5HOUT AREA SHAU BE RELOCATED F-1.7 DETERMINED B¥ THE PROPERTY OWNER wITH Au REOU.ED BIAPS TO A DES]NATED OFF-SITE LOCAnON -CH WILL BE 39.26 FL L 1 FL >-4 ABOVE . 1/ r.'.00 E r-%1.1 ,„F.,1\ . 1- a.,4 .:=1 fi r.31.- 5 1 ' 7.-- - 1. p 7 ? t'II[[I \ 41C 1 - _-_I__ 44 UV 1 39·87-Il THE BASIS OF BEARINGS BEARINGS SHO- HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM R. rASTSTAT,C GPS OeSERVAT,ONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO COORDINATE S¥5.1 OF '983 CEN™AL ZO. (NAD 83, 2019, ALONG ™E SOUTIENLY I€ OF THE SOUTHEAST QU/TER OF SECTION 23. TO-191/ 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 nEST. 6TH PRICPAL 1.1..#. -*CH BEARS SOU™ 89·38720- IST, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOE HEREIN. ' J 0 . arr OF HEAT RIDGE FHACI 1 Ut 0 - 1 11 1 1 BENCHMARK:'K r S80120/-1 131.9 14012'07-w 80.0 4-1 LIMITS OF CONSTRucnON --- -i -- - RECOIRED A O.: ...L».{ ROD IN THE LAN OF IHE -EAT RIDGE ./ HAU, 130' MORE OR LESS SOU™ OF W 29™ AVE mD 530* MORE OR LESS EAST OF WAD).... .. E.EVATION - 5471.62 (NA. 88)1 r-1 - 111 LU.- 7 40.37 Fl 7 -14£.--- 4D.56TL W 293.7La«YS OF CONSTRUCmON) IWEZ...7 1 1:1112„ e*cr-,te ,-ed b¥ the C.11-* •t•IL PW· re,r,nend. reme.m# tbe EC a ...M-In....M-/I W 381}1 AVENUE GRAPHIC SCALE IN FET 0 15 30 60 2 4 -MM- Kimley>*Horn SA+R WAZE E §4-/5//B.....C-1 ISSUED: 12/09/2016 EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET 3 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 151 57 PM K:\DEN_C,vil\09633!009_WestEnd38\CAD [\Cons Iluction\Slte Plon\096331009EC_GD dwg 11 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THESOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SECURE PAM1O40 CTE 818.OW'Ut. 5ECURE PAAKI.21 (iGATE AT t.. 1 - BRIDGE ASOVE I LEVEL 2 le·CLEARANCE...™ , nE-GEO-.REa PER - FDICESm \ 1 1, ,r ·•,• 1, 113 1'TRANSFORMER *f./7/: STF,UCTURALWALLWm BRICK VENEERAND PRECIST CAP -TH STEa ACCESS WWATER DORESSEGRESS e,SEMENT PERREC.NO.0134564 TYPICAL PAR'®0 SPACE 7,9£LACC PAR.0 SPACE 3(7-C• GRESSEGRESS AN[}UnUTY EASEMENr PEREC. NO.F01.207 mACE.i h M r- -e - the ild-lk {bh---1 -__jde,/hed) ./. t p.m Slieel ./11 he . r,I/,Iurn of *.pe-, lo he on' 3' _' *70 - ·rnAN*ORMER _-- ....... TRASH TERMI/%/N ROCal hee.16(r...A.t.-1,-.lk.*Mh L.* l'I'=I -Ile--eed.dc- ././ Me.c adN.t ROW ded,-00 - p i- M.- ne,ded _,-- = c.,©Pr N ===2 RETAILCAN,¥ABOVE · Tr.¢ed N ROW ded-- -1.- 4 irldne-. ,!kne€1= to 11•- for * Ily'lde*4.1,ewi:h/*R(}W'fr· c,d 6 (r mm f-t,-1 i- * */ 'Rth/vc .he,4*.- .:bc.,cd ROW Please .d..., ROW ie-,0.......,-cdcd. cenwnod- thil SITE PLAN Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE ISSUED: 12/09/2016 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN PARTNERS SHFARS ADKINS ROCKMORE SHEET 04 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12®2016 2 05 22 PC \Users'ien,holocument1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_jimhol.,vt*)9 TB-Site Pkin dwg WEST END FILING NO =rsiv#L381 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, Need'ir•-,he ..... ....0,TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, 1 ./.-b.lk CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.862 ACRES - 3 LOTSr-ii-*.U-1 --SHEET 1 OF 4 /"...L......<L RECOIENDED FOR APPROV. THS_._DAY OF 20- .- 1 A.-,pe, r FINAL PLAT BY THE,HEAT 'DGE Pt,NNNG CO-ISSON KNOW Ad··U.BY TIESE PREJTS: ™AT I. '€ t.'IRSIONED. BEING TD€ O-ER -1€' -HOLDER OF UEED··CLIBUST OF ™OSI LANCE DESCR€ED 80-OW. HAvE LAJO 041-81*MDED fAND PLAT,ED THE MN LOTS, IGHT-CF-WAY. AND EASEMENTS. 4&-51/,1 HEREON e® 38 FUdg NO. 1, Ah[1 -2.. THESE PRESENTS. OFOUR O¥N FREE ILL AND VOLUNTAR'ININCUT COCRagfl.-1,/EAT OR BU9/ESS COWFUSON. GRANT AND CON€Y TO ™E CITY OF -EArRIDGE.STATE oF COLORe. ALL EASEMENTS.EXCEPT 1HOSE OF PRIR RECORD. AS 9¢0*1.HEIEMI-IW GRANT AND CONMY TO RE CITY OF m€AT RIDGE AN EAMENT OvER N¥1//b ALL PRIVAT *COESS DRIES AND RK»,TS-OF--WAYFOR THE PURPOSE OF PASSAGE·OFf SERVICE *CLES AND PASSAGE-< ALL VE]*CLES AND PEDESTRIANS OUR' tRGENCY SITUAICN. IT IS EXPRESSLY UND/0/7900.AT THE ACCEPTANCE 981'E DEDICATION OF ™IS EASEMENT E NOT TO BE CONSRUE[hS-ANACCEEJANCEBY THE CITY OF SAID PRIVAI ACCESS CRIVES .40 IGHTS-OF-WAY '0*74lt_InER lilli..4."©ING WAINTENANCE PURPOSES 34 27 /1 -1- L,NOER 7/ NAAE AND SYLE M.·4'41 I i,k„ pecifi.I, de.red, le mete../u1. d...rn'.In, fr' the ......ct' can ber€.™»ed ./ iepl-ed with iii ...... 1..... or Recer'-NInber wher€ the deed / r€orded Pie, noe h,-v....... 26410 I '- RI,lee M,•.•:•f•[ Co6: ur L,-. IMn -1 bo=h . t,=: -enil ol=ed bc--v,- be te=cd The ,r•-0- +I-h*11,11-Icitle'llhe&¢.rn,n,POC andTPOR' UaLI/+//IMN PRov,DED el: FnoELITY ./0.- TITLE .SUOANCE CO-INY co-™ENT No.508-F0563'84-017-017. W™ AN EFFECni DAT OF SEPTEMBER 18, 20,6 AT 7:00 AN. PARCEL ONE:™E S(*ImIWEST QUARTER or THE SOUTHEAST QUARER OF DE SOUDIAEST QUARmR € 91£ SOUTHEAST OU/TER OF SEC·nON 21 10-SHIP 3 SOUTH, RANG[ 69 WEST OF THE 611 P.W.. EXCEPT THE VEST 100 FEET ™EMEOF AND EXCEPT TIE NOR™ 85 FUT OF THE EAST '75 FEET C ™E SOUTHIVEST QU/TI OF ™E SOW™EAST OUARTER OF THE SOUTH*EST QUARTKi or THE SOUTHE*ST QUARP OF SAIO SECHON 23, AND FURT,ER EXCE/nNG ™Ar PORT,0,1 AS DEED TOTHE ITY « WHEAT RIDGE I DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 8,1990 AT RECEPION NO. 90080371, CO,4TY or.EFFERSON, STATE Of COLORADO n\FEET OF ™E EAST 175 FEET OF ™E SOUTH*EST CNE-IJW OF ™E SOUHA T ONE-OUAR·,O, 6,- Ts€ SounliEST ONE QUMER OF THE SOUTICAST ONE OUARIR (SW * SE M SW W SE *) OF SECION 21 70-191IP 3 SOUR. RANGE 60 »EST OF THE STH P.M., COL/,TY OF .EMERSON. STAIDE COLORADO PARCEL ™REI:LOT 1. E.& AUEN SUADMSON. RECORDED JANUARY 4. 20,0 AT ON NO 2010000090 COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COL?ADD U.::jib..3,%.f..#.5<5#':5/.-J' DESCRIBED AS FOU¢*1 8£0*1-0 AT A PON' 30.00) rEET NOTHERLY AND 526.40 FEETCAS,ERLY OF n€ SOUTH*EST CORNER OF SAl SOUBLEAST INEOUARF: ™ENCE NORTHERLY. PARALL£1. 'TH ™E VIST UNE 'F .... EAST ONE...... A DISTANCE OF 421.15 FEET, PENCE M AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF m DEOREES 43 -3155 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A UNC PARALLE1 ¥,H 11€ SOUTH 1.1 Of SAID SOUTHEAST ONE=all,TER A DISTANCE OF 131.85 FEET; ™ENCE CN AN ANOLE TO THE RIG»T OF 90 DEGREES , 3 MNITES 37 SECCIOS A DISTANCE OF421,13 FEET I A POINT 30.00 FErf'ORTHERLY OF DE SAID SOUTH #. 71€ SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARR: n€NCE ON AN ANGLE.TO TI€ mGHT ¢F 89 DEGREES ..NUTES 23 SECONDS A I AL€»10 A UNE OF 30. FEET NORneleY OF AND PAAUEL To ™E SAID SOUTH UNE OF IHESOUTHEAST ONE-OUARU A DISTANCE / 101.82 F€ET TO IHE POINT OF DEGINNING lA. AND EXCEPT ™AT PORION OF 11€.....DESCRIBED LAMO COAEYED TO THE AMERICAN I COMPANY IN ™[ 21ST DAY OF- .-CH, ,991 10 - A PART OF THE SCUTIEAST * OF- 5Ecl •9P 3 Sal™, R-{Z 69 ST OF THE 6™ PRINC,PAL WERIDIAIL 1,O9E PARnelL.AS FOLLOWS· aEG»INING AT A ..T 30+00 FEET NOR 326.40 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOU™\MEST Com€R OF SAID Soll™ST M. THENC ,PARAUA ./. TME IEST ... I. SAID SOUTI€AST M. A DISTANCE OF ,00.0 FEET, THEMCE ON AN ANCUL TO ™E RIGHT (* 89 DEGREES 48 - 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A UP• C PARALIA N. ™E SOU™ ./. OF ./. SOUTHEASY 1/4 . A DISTANCE OF 131 79 FET: ™ENCE ON AN ANGLE 10 n€ ./T OF 90 DECREES 13 ./.S 37 SECONDS. A -TANCE OF ,-00 FET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET */ERLY Or THE SOUTH UKE Of ™E SOUT,EAST M, ™ENCE ON ANANGLE TO ™E IGHT 0, 89 0EGREES 46 1,1,AJES 23 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE OF Ja00 FEE NORTHERLY OF AND PAR,£1£1- TO ,™E SOU™ LNE OF T,* SOUTHEAST k A DISTANCE OF · 31.82 EET TO TI€ PNtCEL OF LAND, COI», rY OF .EFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO lA../ EXCEPT ™AT PORT,04 OF I€ ./.-DESCRIBED LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL FOUR O) \\693[ St L \\»41 SAl 24 I /'A69 CHAIRPERSON .,. 8 FoR FUNG AN[) CONVEYANCE Of THE PAR5 SY THE couNTY OF meN'& calma_.I·--'lr¥20_ gEL 9 11 •· 3240 AVE. ii 1,-1-Rld,e lm--=m=Am AS •U™ORIZED ASENT OF I 00 HEREB¥ URIFY THAT I HAVE EXAMINED TIE nTLE / LASHO- UPON 11€ WITHIN FLAT AS PUeLIC LANDS, PUER/C // -1#MA##*AS.: 5 ISSUED BY FIDELITY NATIOR< TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. ¥4 .... cr VATNESS MY HAND AN[> pF€ill SEAL.MYC/6 11 Ihe,i-,4.-2-·mil# fi/In NOTARY PUBLIC 41,/4../.'•|/ · RIMovil/TERMINATEDINDIXTIN....D · | THE FOLLO-G EASEMEN·TS DEPICTED ON 9€ET 3 OF 4. 1€FEOF. AND DESCR€ED IN FIDELITY NATIONAL InE .,SURANCE CO,PANY eX...TWENT NO. 508-'0583184-0,7-0'7 (ETTECTIVE...-..... 17, 20161 ARE A.EB¥ VACATn), TER-ATED OR WOWED . PART. AS 1. DE 3-FOOT| AND 1<MFOOT PE.dIETER BOUNDARY UTUTY E.1.ENTS ESTABUiED FOR LOT l. EE AUE'SueDIMSION, IKIDED AT RECEPT,ON NO. 2010000090. AND DESCRIED INGOERAL NOTE 4 ARE HERE,r VAGED{} I DE]R ENTIRETY. 4411 tt»E AS - Y DES,RISE' E 'Srne.' Need I :naude All I #n le g . Ve-IR-k) m G,e Clty-.U ,--I 'hv™/1 1./.-bial /-0 _ VIC*ZY.AIF SCALE:/- 2000' OUE S™Et·r DE'EloPINT CO.. LLC, A COLORADO LI're 'Al'lry col'PANY .P NAME: AS¢ NOTARY PLIO STATE OF ) COUNTY OF THE FOREGOING DED,CAION AND FOREGOING COENANT AND PLAT REETRICTON ON CON,EYANCE. SALE OR mANSFU? *ERE Aailon/DOED BEFORE ME MIS -OAY OF 2018. aY .AS , OF OUM S™IT DIEIOP•IENT CO.. LiC. 'TNESS /Y HAND AND OFFICAL SEAL •Y CO-159[»1 EXPMES: NOTARY Pul*IC liTFFT.TiFTI NOR TH YS *fl' AND) TME 508*.-017-017 ni/n O¥ECTM DATE CF CHAmwr·80*RD OF COUNTr 'Cl//SS,0,€RS 12mmAn REEle-PX- THE £FFENSON COL»ITY PUm.IC HEALIM THIS I OA¥ OF PUBUC IEALTH RE,!EwED ./ THE ./'IERSON Cql»,PrA-ANNINO COI'llS/Of'·m#b- DAY OF D.... 5=1*EantigALM APPROYED T•IS - DAY Of 20- BY THE -EAT RIDGE a-Y COUNCIL An.¥ 'Tr CLERK MAYOR COMMUNI™ DELOMENT /'RECTC)4 DIRECTOR OF Pt;BLIC WORKS mmm,Lmnima 1. ROGERT D. SNC©GRAS& A PROFESSONAL LAND SURVEYOR LICEN5EED TO PRACTICE tAN' SU..... n€ STATE IF ./.RADO, DO HEREBY .... ™AT ./EY 0..ST EMD 1 FUIG Na 1 WAS WACE BY WE OR IRECer INDER MY SUPERISIM ON M ABOUT ™E 5™ DAY OF OCTOBER. 206. AND ™AT I€ SUREY IS BASED UPON MY KNOIUDGE.NFORMAmON AND BELIEF, IT HAS BEEN F-PARED IN ACCORDANCE .TH APf'JCABLE STANDARDS ..CE, 11{ .... I NOT A GUAR,NTY oR WARRANTY, In€R ¤'0-AN-G WAP ACCURATELY - PROPERLY SIOnS -nu,is a S.dowaa. l t.My -d S.un . cm,g, To e.h,c -nb-y. -Ik,te •1-6 I. -ul, I. ipeelf,e ,p-e ./¥e 'le, I -Ri,1.1, efW'v· -hi,hi·- bern,•le,d.,11•¢ 1*'e-™ry-o AS FOLLOWS. 8,209#:&*4=25&95:JF-#-9 COLORADO.BEING MORE PARICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOe: BEGINNING AT A POINT SO.00 FEET NORIERLY AND 45.00 FEET EASTERLY / THE SCUTHII CORNER OF SAID SOU™EAST ONEQUARTER, IMICH POINT IS THE ""MIST CORNER OF BLOCK 1PARK AND SHOP Sue#MSION FIST AMENDIENT: THENCE EAST ALONG 9€ SOUTH UNE OF SAID BLOCK 1, 30.00 rEET NOR™ OF AND PARALLEL /™ + SOUM L»€ OF SND S™EAST ONE--OWARTER. A [*fnANCE OF 48140 FEET TD THE OST SOUTHEAST COm€R OF SAID BLOCK 1 E:323'EatEE-*fi43€22 EvA A DISTANCE OF 11/00 FUT TO AN EASTENLY CORNE OF ..... t ™ENCE ON Ah ANGLE O ™E RIGHT . 89 DEGREES 45 WINUS 00 SECO,OS AND ALONG AN EASTULY LNE OF SAO ./. 1 AND PAR...™ n. SOUTH LI€ OF SAID SOUTHEAST 0,€-QUARR, A O;STANCE OF 131..FEET TO AN EASTERLY COmER Of SAK) ILICK 1: MENCE ON AN ANGIE TC n€ 9!Gla / 90 DENEES N -RITES 37 SECO•©S. A DISTANCE Of 115.00 FtC, Tr€NCE ON AN ANGLE TO DE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 46 'NUTES 23 SECOOS AND PARALLEL /™ DE SOU™ LINE OF SAID SOUT€AST ONE-OUARTER. A =1'CE OF 131.70 81. WORE OR LESS. TO THE Tal PaNT oF ...... PARCEL FM:*22'. 'iT ZE:.7:.ETS=1':Ne,Am:F»t.aP-JMA A.I.E. COUN. OF ....SON. STATE OF COLORAD[1 1. PER COLORADO REISED STA,UTES SEC. 38-51-106 (0. All UNEAL UNITS DEPICTED ONTI«S SU!DMSION PLAT AE U.S. SURIEY FEET. ONE Wtil ECUALS 39.37 DIMDED 8¥ 12 u.& SURVEY FEET ACCORDING TO THE NATIONAL INSnTult OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY. 2. THE GE©DET,C POI,41 COOR©NATE DATA 9,0- HEREIN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM THE NAD 83 HARN STATE Pl.n€ COLORADO CENTRAL FN'S 0S02 ...... SYSTEM. AND HAS A HORIZONTAL ACCURACY CLASSFICATION OF 0.07 U" SUREY FUT AT THE00CON/,D€NCE LE€L AS DO-»¢ED IN DE GEOSPATIAL PO97104 NO ACaleACY11 THE FEDERAL GECOETIC CONTROL. SLeCCWWITTEE (FODC-ST}--007.2-,990) I-/0%11/EN' .UIELIMPU [*4 R[PTRI 411+ET.' COVER SHE/1 QUARTER SH-T]ON BR}-AKDOWN 2 EXISTING C ONDTTIONS 3 PROPOS KI) ( ONDI-rIONS 4 6 11/ sl oRMWATER QnLIn n.11 N·11{ *4 . ' A In Jtl.IN S,to,VN AS *ST.'I m i.ER DI.TENTION p.,SEMET SHALL BE CONS™1 4 -11 1 1 "D MA!:I '11" BY 1}UE OWNER AND N[ 1!SEQt 'Pirr , }WNER& HEIRS, SUCCES' *•; AND , *- :·· 11 U 1 U NT 111,T SCCH CONrTRI ·elloN AND 2. ./ 2(-FOOT ./0 16-Flor CROSS ACCESS NORESS IND EGRESS EASEDENTS SET FOR™ IN COER,1 NOm O ON ™E PLAT OF DE ES ALLEN DMSION. RECORDED AT RECEPnON NO. 2010000090. ARE HEREBY VACA'I) I ACCCADANCE VA™ T'€ AUTO),AIC79'MINAION LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN GENERAL Nolt 9. -CH PROvIDES »4 PART MAT SAJD EASEMENTS INE TO TUMNAil Awl FOREVER I EXTINGLISHED IroN DE OCCURRENCE Of THE GRANTErS HORS, SUCCESSORS' AND ASSION' SALE OF LOT 1. ES ALLEN .801/90»4. TO A THIRD PARTY. LOT 1 WAS SOLD TO THE O-€R/SleD/VIDER IEREINDER ON JANUARY I. 201/ 3. ™E EASEMENTS REll„ED IN /ECIA WARRANTY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 2420|2 AT RECEPTION NO.2012,39837 (THE 20-.001 AND) 18-FOOT CROSS ACCESS INOR/S5 ANDEGRESS EASEMENTS) il VACAFD AND YIN-ATED N ACCORDANCE N. DE AUTOW./TEN-AnON LANGUAGE CONTAINED IN 1,€ RESERVAION 0, 1 104'CH 'ENUNA'ON WAS EFFECTM UPON THE GRANTErS HIPS.. SUCCESSORS' I SALE OF Loll. ES ALLEN ......... -0 A ./. lilli ..E O.IR/SU./.0 €R ON JANUARY 18 201/7- 4 THE FASEMENTS FOR RIGHTS OF WAY GRANTED TO IHE .TY OF -EAT RIDGE IN A OEED RECORDED OCTOBER & 1/90 AT RECEPTION NO 900/8585 (mANT»,0 (1) A 27.27-FOOT EASEMENT ANI RIGHT-Cr-WAY i UPHAN SmEET. /10 (1) A 75-FOOT EEMENT AND IGHTOF WAY / 38. A...IS ./.ED.. PART. BY A REDUCTION OF THE UPHAM STREET EASEMENT GRANT TO ™E fEW UPHAM STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY EK»IDARY ESTABLISHED BY 9*S PLAT. &MF&:,67;411$76% %5:6/jifV--.,=-4Nk W,%m AND RECORDED AT RECEPnoN m 122823. l \ chaluimu SNCE=4 ROF-tON,1 LSEMENTS, ER·REU. E=Dpt .EDIALF 1::jtb.INC. 116*CE: ACCORDING TO COLOR# LAW YOU UUST CO,#ENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THS 9JRVEY VA™IN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISC[MR SUCH DEFECL N NO EMNT MAY ANY ACTON BASED I,ON ANY DEPECT IN THIS SURVEY SE COMMENCED MORE ™AN 124 YEARS FRON ™E DATE OF THE CERIFICAION SHO- HEREON. CUIE Al -COR-R CIRTFAll ACCEPTED .09 ./COR'ING IN T. OFFICE OF THE CaINTY CUERK ./ RECOROED' OF .EFFERSON COUNI AT COLD.. COLORADO, NS -DAY OF .20_ CITY OF -EAT RIDGEE JEFFERSON COUNTY CLERK AND RECIZER PUBLIC WORKS DATE 12/14/2016 BY: DEPITY ...RECOVED 12/1/2010 1*t Submle.I!11' 4, Ii' fille,"„ bve ' .4 ..COVI·R %111 f· T|1Ic .1 the lou*rne. t1.·lih mu,ple hee( el'DATE OFDEVELOPER--+PAArr-N 0-10-/..XI'lEN./.7....PER}i ... 1• 1/ i 'll" •, .. lili i 11·Y .....TRIDGE SH.All.1//7 p,e.,c ierlac:,•ilh, - RliM{)VI D M. 'Al/AATEC-,-1801 eROADWAY. SU TE 1175 .CA | I n, lu 'l .: . l rn 1 K i . e .-I NIE,UG!/ TOEKIERSUCU A. . B.11 141 4!I . · 1. •}r-i W€.I.l e{)STOF WHIC,1 SAID MR'IN ATED. IND I XTINGI 1SHED W( P-16·IM ,-*I ,A„UNER. 10.IRS, StrrES}R& ANDAW.1•.,. t•.1,}} • 11,1'i, 4, BlllI>INGORS™1·t-nlO 1,1 WSP·16·07 CONSULTATS INC ...,..,_„-DEN'ER, CO 8202J -*./WAZEE PARTNERS. LLC BECONSTR,1[-rED.T,DETENTIO'· UU , -1, ,(11,GLS OR I TERA...£.....('17-16·02Ple-*kdc•.tI n 1/ .....R \( TERIS nes , / / 0 1 * 11 ·m, r . / 11 J BE 1./. ./ 1 11 [1 /1,ri /,4...he.-e }!14'. u '4 I. ..1 f T{/ f g / Il k /!44..1..... .....S.*Er 1 0, 4 WEST END FILING38 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23 TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.862 ACRES - 3 LOTS QUARTER SECTION BREAKDOWN SHEET 2 OF 4 FINAL PLAT Pc, Se€ 26·410£ of the Wh,0 Rld,le M.-2-1 G*k of .ws the B- 'g, ./I be oe :hc ' ,-i C. Aw-, .. . mud,fld. ... ·*.,d fwrn of the NA[»3•2 (NAD HARN' k- M- S¥*m CEN;ER 1/4 CCRUER SECF 21 US. *6911 E™ P. FOUND No. 6 REaAR .11+ 3-i/.- Alt,1.- IP WAWPED t. OF IHEA R,D[r 1¥5- 7/12=3:2590-liu,5. OR16857 i./In,IDE-;05/4/J./.0 NORWERLy L E 1 94 SEC 23N89'41'34/ 26:KE -r-- N ..·i ....-d-e -c. I be w-n funt, r™la-,- 141109 708•82.1 EASY ,/4 CORNER SECTION 21 01 869% 6™ P •, FOUKO NO 6 REBAR .74 /-1,/C AL-UN- CAP .A-ED :I OF *HEAT .DGE .84 LAnn«.39·43W N LIN/UCE-.0./.'.9.50«0- I imBAL.NOIm ................/......./........ UPON THE COLORADO COORDINAIE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (HN2_03._2011), ALONG hRLY ME / TD€ SOUT}€AST QUARU OF SECT- 23. TO-SHIP 3 SOUTH, RANCE 89 *EST./ 1/...5715MW&529<9././4/-a_-AN- 21 NoncE: ACCORD-G TO COLORADO LAW ¥00 Il)/ COI//DICE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY 1 DEFECT IN THIS g.?WY IT- il-REE rEARS AFTER Yx]U FRIT DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. I NO EVENT WAY ANT ACTON EBASED UPON ANY DEFECT 04 THIS 5*lnli BE C/11/BCED UORE liWi TEN| YEARS '1,0/ ™E 'Alt OF 11€ CER™ICAHON SMOVIA HEREON. 3) ANY ./SON .40 KNOVINGLY R.OVES, ALTERS OR DEFACES ANY PUBLIC LAND SIR'€Y WON..4T(S)OR .0 UOUNDY MONUIENT(Sk OR ACCESSORY Co-15 A CLASS ./ (2) WSDE'EANOR PURSUANT TO 18-4-508 CRI 3387 4 ...,mo.eGe...e· thetISS-•c,+001,»dermed=,ienenl !511li11,,ITItIm,37*c Note • 1 fu-d un Sheri 1 N¥ 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.3S., R.691'f., SIXTH P.M. NE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.3S., R.69WL, SIXTH P.M. IB 51 .-I GENIALII-,REDICAIONS AND PLAT RESTRICION£ AS SHOWN ON IE PLAT OF IST END 38( FLING NO. iv.LAT - SIIALL APPLY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED AND SUPERSEDED HEREBY 'Al-)./.-Ic: -46.21,94.-3ty#12---/:67. 36-51-106 AND THE RUES OF PROCEDURE AND BOARD POLICY STATEMENTS OF M STRE BOARD OF UCENSURE FOR 'ROMTECTS. PROFES51©NAL ENGINEERS AND PROFESIONAL LAND SUR/ErORS.SPECIFICALLY ™OSE BOARD RULES AND POLICY STABIENTS RELATING TO ME DEPIC110,1 OF EASEMENA * mGMTS OF WAY ON SUBDIVISI<N PLATS, nTLE CO-™ENT NUMSER 50-F0SS3184-0,7-017. DA,DSEP'BeER le, 2010 AT 7:00 A. PREPARED 8Y FIDELITY NAT,ONAL E MRANCE CC-AMY. WAS REUED UPON ./ ALL .....TON REGARDING EASE'ENTS OF REC.., RIGHTS OF WAY. ITLE OF RECORD A,/ ark COURT ACTIONS / RECORD. 7) ALL DIVENSONS -0- HEREON ARE AS MEASURED UNLE55 0™ERISE NOB. 8) BASED ON A GRAPHICAL REPRES[NTATION OF FEDERAL DIEROENCY MANAGE,€NT AGENCY (FIMA) FLOOD INS,mANCE RATE MAP (FRM) MAP 1,0 08059C0214£. DATED FIERUARY 4 201 4 THE SUBICT PROPERTY UES I™IN 0™ER AREAS ZONE K BEING OEFINED AS AREAS 0EltlifilED TO GE OUTENDE ™E All r ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD PLAIN 1 ATTTVDE 1 t»,OrTUDE Uf.tr %21 N¥ 14 SW 1/4. 7,SE 1/4 4 1 / %1 11-1 iAl .897V#¥ AL·64,-- --- - ,-a.a -- \\41The C ily·, pubil.hed cr•,dk.- I•k,5 m-: bo -& the mrn,ne, 1 5709 N = 705.348 E = 118441.25' 1 *-rn,... -l SW 1/4 dul - h \ SW 1/4\ SE 1/4 1--r kle•412•L.,1 6 L.Am/t/*<09 720.- N /£0Van.¥-030•31207.- 1 1 ) SOU™ I/4 CORNER lele• 21 I&6*W. 6™ P M *321 Sotmll'..NFRS,( 23 T....'//1.4 FOUNDMO •RFA,RV.mi "/ A. r' CAP N.'IMPED m-OF nlinT R)(*1*' co¥/RPT No 170• €}Rt'IND{*]RDINTES N89·35ll 2630.66' --- 65.66' NE 1/4 SW 1/4 SE 1/4 ssa U ____ 1 4NWI I : WEI SE 1 4 a . SE 14 11 *t AN 1 1123 32,1 f , K . . S89•4 *52. SW 1/4 SE 1•SE 1/4 SE 1,4S194 $ -1„ / 1/4 3 '% 1 r al r 89· 18 1. W i , --a-,A· A,Iber' I (0¢-,1 N-r •1 1.0¥e S·3870. 263US 12: 1(i]&1 1%1 --liB-----1--- 1/% */ fer//*wral /* 01 .&/3 SE 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 23, T.3S., R.691., SIXTH P.M. 0-k *ho•vn fu, - mc,-ne™ 1 1%0 -'144 7039&6139 I"-705•40.-12;NZA. = 121076. £00¥04¥01*AW:Y 81 969,4 6™ P* ........Al 4090% FOUND /0 6 RESAR .. j-1/4- ALUI-U CAP 5™•PED .TY . =.GE 1,8/ Cone P, Naslare' *1™ 3-1/C ALU-af CAP STAWPED *CITY OF ./AT RIDGE CO- PT NO.158. €\ 329.20 65a.16.25 SF CORNER SFCTH. . 73& *· 1·TH P M FnLNDNE)RFBARWInt ..- ALUM C...TAMPID CITY'./.'ATRI'l 0- PT NO I ™» OROLDro,D™ATFS LATITUDE 'o.rim. 1,RIER SH-1 ION HRFAKDOWN , ....H I Amt ...1 -I GROUND COCRONIA?ES. 6- H-705,829669 E-,19....48 CE••39'4609 73730* N LON¢,TUDE-,0.........7- W 1//79. »LE :/255 CORNER SEc nON 21 US R69¥. GTH P.M. rOUND NO 6 REBAR 1,4 3-,/4; ALUMINUM CAP .VPED •EAT RIDGE S,REET ./. 83.4 ./.2 .94- (SOU»'E.Y L#€ SE 1/4 SEC 24 <BASIS OF BEARINGS) AAZTEC .,-0.,1,13-1- Ill-'d-- -Ill CONSULTANTS INC til',»2:I-=- DEVELOPER .=m.20... DEVELOPER DEV STREET ADDRESS scum r.,0SOME,ERE, COLCRADC 003) 608-5868 S.1, r 20• 4 WEST END FILING38 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, BOUNDARY ESTADLISIIMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.862 ACRES - 3 LOTS .ENERAL COMMENIS I ./.FS'REMOVINIALI ......}-0.MATION'/OMT,!13.§11ET.HATISHOWNONTH} EXISTING CONDITIONS /SHEET 3 OF 4 OVARTIERSHTION.REAKDOWNSHEFT ....mR'.Alll-E I 1 FINAL PLAT 5 1/2 9 1/1 SE 1/4 SEC. 20 T.E. R.MT., Sri™ P.N. .ra- ' ·El-9 13-7 1mEAT RGE AARNE?PLCE ==. 1/4 •e Na,rt=70 LOr 2 1 1 1 /1 ,($31,65/ ' 489-38'20'E 131.77' ' -------T - -1489·38'44'E 304.07- -I- - TE 1 Im=."*200 zoi,<·„ E 1/4 t.005) 1 44 4l PARCEL 3 {PER 'TLE COMI,ENT):2-n- Lori C.& ,•u. suscn•/IN AC ..0/2,000.F Irry 5. i--b for L__22:- |Ihe,cll - r-'----am=./ / - '44*E (131 70) ' N89·3OWE 131.81 19/ +1--- - .--.- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2* . 1)1[ SW V•; SE 1/4 91 /4 2 /4 U 24 /...:41=11 7= _3 ' A \ \ r--<- \ 4- TRI.€ POI,T OF BES,INING \ 21,10 EXCE.nON PARCa. 4 ZG'GIl 3.*0,CLOOS-- 1 SYMBOL LEGEND rou•) SECTION CORNER POUNO NO. S ./.AR I™ 1-1/4- ORANGE PLASTIC CAP STAMPED AZE LS 36580- F,1,0 No. 5 RESAR ,//1-1/4 RED P-ASTIC CAP STAMPED'COLO ENG AND SURV LS 269. .r Z .OCK I ¥*EAT R«XI "Am'JILACE == ,EC al re.5,#I 70NNI 1 4./ 4/ 6,7- 1 IS 1 1§ 1 /R: 1 /# 4 1 ./*%-4 PARCEL 4 (P=H Il]LE /01•1•ENT) S89·38'20"W 13193' (3t. 79') : b S bl a Z b1 3 *@$ 7..PnOA' PA,!Pen ' PARCEL 5 (PEl In.£ CCM¥,™ENT) 9 1/4 SE 1/4 Slr 1/4 SE 1/4 01 r ce-- .ap Frap™,i. 84%'ca f $ PARCEL 2 (PEN Ill-E COMW.ENT} 1 11 .=1 11: fi' 1' ..1--1 1 1 . PARCal l 1l1(PER ./. COv. INENT)rn¥a„ea .0,1.--4=AE-4/vi N8938'20E | 31.75'N 1 12 1% r 1 '....... I =d.BAR W/1-1/4- G,EDJ PLASBC FOUND NO, 5 RE'AR .THOUT A CAP40 (NOT ACCEPTE]) FOUND 3/4- *ASS TAG AND NA 5.IU.EGEBLE (NOT ACICEMED} Ar=,70 0/,ANCES PER LEGAL DESCRITON SEE 9€Er • FOR EASEMENT AA,0 LIT ...S ...... %F(mONLINF How I IN Flu)PERTYLIN' LOT I.INF E..EMENT i k gli m"rap"#Rea ·A ' 1 REC. NO. 9000/571 1\11N «4'==3-7- u fSF tCE'nON PARCE' 4 57&.· 70 *pt<g '3 =. rEfur 4,<MA nED -M-- Sool.SO•t SE CCRP". 5,/nON 21 / 19.61 /*237 ' ..3 ,H.I. onsheelzI- 1 NOO-13'04-W67 •0· m sle-,p atocr i. p.- (13186 .r....r 1 ,-1 6..... -- ---19.61' & SHOP St,80'4SON flAST WEM),IENT j 49'38'20'/0.98' 1W. 1 589·38'20)V 100.00'1#L':= .E.P. mt... NY 31.75W. 38TH AVENUE " 589·Mf20-41 J W. 38TH AVENUE po,N-T .,57 /CE.10, "Ad'Ch I .0{AE..:™*ED I I.B...'/Am./ ¥,D. PU.C ROW)I. I (VARIA'/ ·ME'ril .._i. ROW) t ..INNG -NOO-12'07-V ./1 emee Belle'4,- - PARCEL 4 (A)30.00· 1 1 *FV"€ SE 4/.9.4 23 =a,20...uy S89'38'20'W 229.20 E-•-E 1/256 CORNER SE¢1104 21 TA RGII. 6™ P.M. (BASS OF 8EAR•IGS)rOU,C /0 5 .EAR .™ 3-,B AWN,NU CAP STA.Prl '·-EAr RIDGE SmEET MON 8,34 "132,2 18 1£1...'/1.119. rmilimi.211-ik=L :* 7 ... 1/4 CORNER .... 21 \ ./ .9/6™ PM L FOUND No. 6 'fe,2 ..3-1/4 A-Rdnes I€Ar #aDGE es ,3212 igel·,-Ip. I. *. 2 • All :,1,im: pan.e, 1,nes . *re,r.ved rm...... «le,ined al .t.1 -PAR(l [ i.!NI· HI-RI-BY REMOWD BY ™]S PLAT - b All em" /m! Ime, to /"mcd m' he cle=ly klentlfied as bem; -PAR{1 [ 1-INE TO REMAiN c All ....0 ea,¢me,m „po.al ./ ie,no¥/ I./be cle.ly •1-fied I. ./.EMENT 1{EREBY REMOVED. EXT/GUISHED. AND TERM//TED BY TH[S FLAT d '11....ememon..............le.1. 1,1.1,6li, he,n. AAZTECR37CON'ULTAN'S INC .........„...... rgt./. I#,F / "INI ING COND! 1 U)"....!r*¥4 K DEVELOPER ,=.-2---/ DEVELOPER OEV 51REET ADDRESS =r.r sow[¥0+ENE. COLORADO (303' 5..6860 5/1 E T 3.. . WEST END FILING38 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. 3.862 ACRES - 3 LOTS NORTHLOTLOT AND EASEMENT DETAIL SHEET 4 OF 4 PROPOSED CONDITIONS FINAL PLAT INced . -2. . St*.le, Dae-- F-=.e, I. I. -F•R•,c. Ih¢ ....0 1/trIc,n-1*.-. f.ality E.scmenl rr-,4 be -d . the pl-/ -y I ./ kcatable 1 ,1 LIRIGHT-oy--fardo BO 1C £072 Al FIST RK'W W A?9%3 m OCCATED E¥ T*·PEAT nEr,LEN suloneoN -S 1/2 SIN/f SE 1/4 SEC. 23. -./38'20*t ' 40 . # 71. R»l.. SIXTH IN Men./ I dat-les 1 =4 1 1 0.-..,eo-1 "•• 'Ple.'el'...£ g.....La-Po.ed......4- 1 411:DICAT,DI,inlispiAT I'l" U .il .I H 1 EC: ao 450 1 -1- 01 thr ill.,1 Lor 6. /ear i . 1 11N89'30'447\ 30407 AA , == - EXC-o. ..Ren Mes,e rot,e det-1 10 REC NO /0086•'71 math the graphle' AF.F.11 A.i/,4 M 7. =.e./ n=,1,8 the plt.€ J GIne,g,cy Access tawment. che ,•-m ./.*......... h =.-Ile! ./i,¢ -U m,ke .. ,-= for f--c re=len.i.... J /,ahnor 131,1%.58£8*'1792 : Ar- - / i 9---Ig:/# ;:i f \ .-20+14- A.-*-1 1,1 '1':EE.h / Ill...../ KTORMWATE DETENTION EASEMENT HFREBY GRANTED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BY THIS PLAT REFER TO EASEMENT NOTE K SHFET 1 01 LOT 1 i em. 1(y-de -fallp" 1 -4:11:=g E sF 0262 AC N89*38'4CE/25.07 N==1- 1 DETAIL ·,1 · SCALE '- / SYMBOL LEGEND _*-/OUND SECnON CORNER „ f'OJND NO. 3 REBAR VA™ 1-1/4 ORANGE OLAS,IC CAP STAWED ..C LS 36580 OUND NO 3 REBAR ./1-1/4 ID PLASTIC 7.CAP STAMPED COLO ENG AND SURV LS 269. FOUND NO 5 REBAR Wn-1/4 GREEN PLASnC3.CAP ILLE'BLE FOUND NO. 5 RE8AR THOUT A CAP (NOT ACCEMED) FOUND 3BRASS TAG AND NAIL5.ILLEGIaLE (NOT ACCEPTED) - 9 88"1 1 Ple.hebe........ROW PW „44:rity n. h,Mh <*ME) C 3/% led:.....Ille'lm:'.....mor/20 DISTANCES PER LEGAL DESCRIPTON,1,1¢5 of the ILsemenl p-•lk! - % f,, i,npl/7 i *---,23 All,crect.4 :.......1 -dph,rn /1 10,¢cr,,d- i fl==t=-1nuri=IiI ,*Ce'·tvr i•.dr dcu'ld i•wv•Bi (the 6' -I dht-C · . 1 mulfully.-al..% L»€ TLE UNE BEARI«; LENGTH U S6312'.03-w .67-SEE SHEEr • FOR .EN. AND loT DEr·*ILS - 31. 1 83 -•20.00- N0010-13-W 208.15 40.31 LOr 7,8LOCK 1 -EAT RIDGE MARKETPLACE suscfls;CW. ARST .WG EC na r9*207 4/ 0 4/ rai-1 dist=e · typ I \ NIDO'006 119.65 1 im.fll'-11,!,FliY,ritiNEr,11, 1 Id..... r. 1 ix Am. T.I. RADUS UNG- 50.00'Ill 50.00'22.77 12.00' 22.84' 76 00'1,03'P,ovl,Ir mete' * b...., for.11 Irk,1-n. *illhilk i L bt 0/•VE O.,TA C, 15'3'.2, . 25·05'13b C3 10904'2grgb · .10-34'45 CS 3·30'35 25.00* 1.MSOO'13 CHCRD N71·05'44-E. 1130' S76-23*•0W. 22. /54·32'3/W. 19.55 N7672'361 N.Or S.·44'41/ '.53' /9000'00 E 112.83 .1-1. ---Pic-ecul-geth' Ill· ·38'20-W 131.93 '\_N0012'07-W .h /:M g?:·red®eal.ged£t,1-* U 4 -441&%,.i.**".-N89'38'207_ :99=& 8.di-veenen·.¢ment'k'I¢, 1 8 .,1„1, M.!\ 31.75'. T."ue. cle'll/p•LOT 2 C , @11. : E li1,nr*.,.,0 *lemiher/-2 D ZZ» 5 --/£ % 100-571 \C A-* 41 & 8 / 0 EXCEPTION 7 j -AAFED PARCEL .-S0073'04'E .CORNER .Cl)ON 21U *7,#I'M, r---- 3&46* %/'/:US R6™ 6. PU. Fol»D I. 6.... 1 I.·38'20/ 1•569 /NOO·13=-T --I ,;m,JI=ZY&-7 REVIe'l8 2.SURB <.•€N r LS 13212 $- 12 1 '4TH ROW -.i-,-mileorl 29'3420"N IOOM W. 38TH AVENUE ___399- /It ]-D WS AT -·38'20#W. 38TH AVENUE 31.73'.....LE .... lilli ROW) (.Al/BIL lili ajel{1 4/VO N00-12'01-W UU Can/'ANG . F ND I ED'4F I SOUTH UNE CF THE SE 1/4 or SEC / 589·38'20/ 2633 58'$89-38'20 I 229.20 W-E 1/256 CORNER SECICM..ar'135. ASK, 45™ RM (BASIS OF BEAR»4GS)3-1/C ..INUM CAP STA,IPED 3./.1¥/. 19.61 l.{E 11¢- be i- to ldennry -y niemral. he=N '-ed by 11„• M.t .itux E-ASEMENT HEREBY ORANTED BY ™MIAT 311 1 1.-.e,0c... ¢kim,1111®E• · 1,11 Ple..cl .dri,ede,t,h,ROW ded,c,1....11 he ium,al ./. W 3-Av loax==,d-/ f-1-16 w.de-.Id,Irwilk{.6' v,-1 fun, 11·.rhb. the ROV ) Ple- a-hn- ¢hil ..1 »,e.. ..grn »,FAT RIDGE STREET MON 0334 LS, 32,2 1994 AAZTEC *del,„4- =1-•1-*-1 1--Cl,1- -11 CONSUI.ANTS INC =41=02=-- 1·......t........ DEVELOPER ,=?&m.-*. DEVELOPER DEV S,REET ADDRESS sce r." 50•E•€Ri COLORADO (303) 68.-6868 S.EET .... 4 9 .City of47VVheatit*lge -- PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, AICP, Senior Planner FROM:Mark Westberg, PE, CFM, Project Supervisor DATE:February 3,2017 SUBJECT:West End 38 Traffic Impact Study - December 2016 - 1 St Review I have completed my review of the Traffic Impact Study dated December 2016 for the proposed West End development at the northwest corner o f 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have the following comments regarding this submittal: 1. Page 3, Figure 2, Site Plan a. The access from Upham Street is not obvious. Please make this access more noticeable. b. Add traffic flow arrows to the driveways to make the traffic pattern more obvious. c. The one-way exit from the bank is too wide. This driveway should be narrowed to no more than 16 feet. 2. Page 8, Proposed Land Uses - The last paragraph on Page 8 does not seem necessary. 3. Page 9 & 10 - Existing Land Uses a. Since D&A Auto Services was closed at the time of the existing traffic counts, then it should not be included as one of the existing land uses in the last paragraph on Page 9. b. The Automobile Care Center row should be deleted from Table 4 and the Vehicle Trips adjusted accordingly. 4. Page 17- Recommended Improvements a. The City would like to explore the impacts to the site plan of having a two-lane approach for 3 8thAvenue/Upham Street. b. Possibly the parking lane that is just to the north of the intersection could be extended south to 38th Avenue with a no parking sign beyond this point located to allow two on-street parking spaces to the north and the right turn lane to the south. L A Wheat Ridge Sanitation District 7100 West 44th Avenue, Suite 104 P.O. Box 288 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-0288 Phone: 303-424-7252 Fax: 303-424-2280 December 16, 2016 Lauren Mikulak Community Development 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Email: Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us Re:WRSD- Sanitary Sewer Availability - 7323 W. 38th Avenue Martin/Martin, Inc Project No.: 17456.C.01 Dear Ms. Mikulak, On behalf of the Wheat Ridge Sanitation District (WRSD), Martin/Martin Inc., acting as District Engineer, offers the following referral response for the property at 7323 W. 38th Ave. The referral response is based on a site plan received by email on December 14, 2016. The proposed development includes three buildings: an apartment building, a bank and a retail store. The Wheat Ridge Sanitation District has no objections with the proposed development conditional on the items identified herein are fully addressed. The following are general requirements for sanitary sewer service. Please note that this property is within in the Wadsworth Boulevard Corridor and is subject to participation fees. The subject lot at the address referenced above is entirely within the boundary and service area of the Wheat Ridge Sanitation District. Treatment of sewage generated within the Wheat Ridge Sanitation District is provided by the Metro Wastewater Reclamation District (Metro). Existing Sanitarv Sewer Mainline Locations Wheat Ridge Sanitation District has the following sanitary sewer mains adjacent to the proposed property: • 8-inch mainline running south to north within Upham Street, east of the referenced property. • 8-inch mainline running west to east within W. 38th Avenue, south of the referenced property. The developer is responsible for determining depths of the existing sanitary sewer main to verify if gravity flow is feasible or if a private individual sewage ejector (lift station) is required. The issuance of a sewer tap permit by the District does not in any way guarantee that the property can be served by gravity flow. Certified documentation indicating the amount of flow that the development will contribute to the sanitary system is required to initially evaluate if the existing sanitary sewer services are sized adequately. A sanitary sewer flow study is required to show that the anticipated peak flows can be accommodated by the existing downstream facilities. Flow Study Requirements Coordination is ongoing with the developer regarding requirements for the wastewater flow allocation study. Utility Plan Review Each building requires a separate sanitarysewer service line and connection to the District main. If the service line is 6-inches in diameter or greater, then the connection to the District mainline must occur with a minimum 4' diameter manhole (Please indicate on plans). Concerning the connection of the service line to the WRSD's sanitary main line, it is required that the following details are included in the plan set to ensure construction is completed to District standards: Wheat Ridge Sanitation District 7100 West 44th Avenue, Suite 104 P.O. Box 288 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80034-0288 Phone: 303-424-7252 Fax: 303-424-2280 • Manhole Eccentric Cone • 24" Diameter Ring and Cover - Cover with "Sanitary" • Cast in Place Manhole Base Detail • Typical Base Channelization Details • Manhole Invert Tie-in Detail • MH-Pipe Water Stop Gasket • Polypropylene Reinforced Plastic Manhole Step • Trench Detail • PVC Saddle Connection Detail These details are attached for your convenience and may not reflect all the details required for the project. Please provide a certified PE detail for the proposed 3,000 gallon grease interceptor. Plumbing plans for units flowing into the grease inceptor are also required to ensure that the interceptor is sized adequately. Attached are the District's regulations concerning grease interceptor sizing. Costs All costs involved - reviews, design, contract development, construction, observation and inspections - are the responsibility of the Owner/Developer. Please be aware that proper tap and development fees are required to be paid prior to connection to the District main. These fee amounts can be paid directly to the District Office prior to connection, payable to Wheat Ridge Sanitation District, which also collects Metro Wastewater' s "connection fees". Tap fees will be based on water meter size. A tap fee letter can be provided upon coordination by the Owner/Developer in regards to water meter size. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Ms. Sue Matthews during regular office hours, 8:30 am to 12:30 pm, or Bill Willis, MARTIN/MARTIN Consulting Engineers, 303-431-6100. Sincerely, LD Jul= Bill Willis District Engineer MARTIN/MARTIN, Inc. Ce: Sue Matthews - Wheat Ridge Sanitation District 96 Xcel EnergySM PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY Right of Way & Permits 1123 West 3rd Avenue Denver, Colorado 80223 Telephone: 303.571.3306 Facsimile: 303. 571.3284 donna.1.george@xcelenergy.com January 3, 2017 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Attn:Lauren Mikulak Re:West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02 Public Service Company of Colorado's (PSCo) Right of Way & Permits Referral Desk has reviewed the plans for West End 38. As always, thank you for the opportunity to take part in the review process. To ensure that adequate utility easements are available within this development, PSCo requests that the following language or plat note be placed on the preliminary and final plats for the subdivision particularly along lot lines where there are not already dry utility easements: Minimum ten-foot (10') wide dry utility easements are hereby dedicated on private propertv abuttinq all public streets, and around the perimeter of each commercial/ industrial lot in the subdivision or platted area including tracts, parcels and/or open space areas.These easements are dedicated to the City of Wheat Ridge for the benefit of the applicable utility providers for the installation, maintenance, and replacement of electric, gas, television, cable, and telecommunications facilities (Dry Utilities). Utility easements shall also be granted within any access easements and private streets in the subdivision. Permanent structures, improvements, objects, buildings, wells, and other objects that may interfere with the utility facilities or use thereof (Interfering Objects) shall not be permitted within said utility easements and the utility providers, as grantees, may remove any Interfering Objects at no cost to such grantees, including, without limitation, vegetation. Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) and its successors reserve the right to require additional easements and to require the property owner to grant PSCo an easement on its standard form. Public Service Company also requests that all utility easements be depicted graphically on the preliminary and final plats. While these easements may accommodate certain utilities to be installed in the subdivision, some additional easements may be required as planning and building progresses. In addition, 31-23-214 (3), C.R.S., requires the subdivider, at the time of subdivision platting, to provide for major utility facilities such as electric substation sites, gas or electric transmission line easements and gas regulator/meter station sites as deemed necessary by PSCo. While this provision will not be required on every plat, when necessary, PSCo will work with the subdivider to identify appropriate locations. This statute also requires the subdivider to submit a letter of agreement to the municipal/county commission that adequate provision of electrical and/or gas service has been provided to the subdivisions. The property owner/developer/contractor must contact the Builder's Call Line at 1 -800-628-2121 o[ https://xcelenergy.force.com/FastApp (register so you can track your application) and complete the application process for any new gas or electric service including transformers located ON the property, or modification to existing facilities including relocation and/or removal. It is then the responsibility of the developer to contact the Designer assigned to the project for approval of design details. Additional easements may need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities. As a safety precaution, PSCo would like to remind the developer to call the Utility Notification Center at 1-800-922-1987 for utility locates prior to construction. If you have any questions about this referral response, please contact me at (303) 571-3306. Donna George Contract Right-of-Way Referral Processor Public Service Company of Colorado Lauren Mikulak From:George, Donna L <Donna.L.George@xcelenergy.com> Sent:Thursday, January 5, 2017 7:53 AM To:Lauren Mikulak Subject:RE: West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02 Hi Lauren, I spoke with our Arvada office, and given there won't be a 10-foot utility easement along Upham Street, we are wondering where our transformers and (probably at least 1) switch cabinet will be located? Per PUC standards we are required to place them on the property being served within easements. It was suggested that the Design Manager, Craig Peters (303-425-3890), be contacted to determine where these units can be placed in order to serve the property, and the clearance requirements that need to be considered. Thanks! Donna George Xcel Energy Contract Right-of-Way Referral Processor I Right of Way and Permits P: 303-571-3306 donna.1.george@xcelenergy.com From: Lauren Mikulak [mailto:Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 2:39 PM To: George, Donna L Subject: RE: West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02 XCEL ENERGY SECURITY NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Exercise caution before clicking on any links or attachments and consider whether you know the sender. For more information please visit the Phishing page on XpressNET. Donna, Thanks for providing your referral response. I know this is the standard PSCO request, but as you saw in the site plan, the buildings are within 10 feet of the property line, so the perimeter easement requests cannot all be accommodated. Further I wanted to confirm that you saw the proposed undergrounding of the electrical lines along Upham Street. As currently proposed this would be within the right-of-way. Thanks and happy new year! Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2845 '... t,4 O' ..10 W lieat 1 iC icre - C.*)MMUNII¥ [)1 611.01'MIN 1 b 1 From: George, Donna L [mailto:Donna.L.George@xcelenergy.coml Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 7:45 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02 2 Lauren Mikulak From:George, Donna L <Donna.L.George@xcelenergy.com> Sent:Thursday, January 5, 2017 9:31 AM To:Lauren Mikulak Subject:RE: West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02. Hi Lauren, I also missed something on the review that I wanted to point out - Easement Note #5 should be removed, as any PSCo easements must be vacated by separate quitclaim document which would be processed by our Arvada office. Thanks, Donna From: George, Donna L Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2017 7:53 AM To: 'Lauren Mikulak' Subject: RE: West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02 Hi Lauren, I spoke with our Arvada office, and given there won't be a 10-foot utility easement along Upham Street, we are wondering where our transformers and (probably at least 1) switch cabinet will be located? Per PUC standards we are required to place them on the property being served within easements. It was suggested that the Design Manager, Craig Peters (303-425-3890), be contacted to determine where these units can be placed in order to serve the property, and the clearance requirements that need to be considered. Thanks! Donna George Xcel Energy Contract Right-of-Way Referral Processor I Right of Way and Permits P: 303-571-3306 donna.1.george@xcelenergy.com From: Lauren Mikulak [mailto:Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2017 2:39 PM To: George, Donna L Subject: RE: West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02 XCEL ENERGY SECURITY NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Exercise caution before clicking on any links or attachments and consider whether you know the sender. For more information please visit the Phishing page on XpressNET. Donna, Thanks for providing your referral response. I know this is the standard PSCO request, but as you saw in the site plan, the buildings are within 10 feet of the property line, so the perimeter easement requests cannot all be 1 accommodated. Further I wanted to confirm that you saw the proposed undergrounding of the electrical lines along Upham Street. As currently proposed this would be within the right-of-way. Thanks and happy new year! Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner Office Phone: 303-235-2845 Cil,· t,1317 W heat 12*JEN-O)A,4MUNIM DIVil<11'MINI 4- From: George, Donna L [mailto:Donna. L.George@xcelenergy.coml Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2017 7:45 AM To: Lauren Mikulak <Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us> Subject: West End 38, Case #s MS-16-08 / WCP-16-04 / WSP-16-07 / CUP-16-02 2 Lauren Mikulak From:Pulciani, Dustin <Dustin.Pulciani@centurylink.com> Sent Wednesday, January 4, 2017 7:04 PM To:Lauren Mikulak Subject:RE: Referral :: West End 38 Importance:High Lauren, This email serves as the formal response for CenturyLink to the proposed site plan and replat. CenturyLink does not approve of either the site plan or the replat at this time. The Easement Notes section of the proposed Replat indicates that several of the platted PUEs will be vacated. CTL has existing facilities within these PUEs and those facilities have been identified on the Utility Plan and other documents submitted by the Applicant. If the Applicant desires to vacate these PUEs, then the Owner needs to set a meeting with our engineering department in order to discuss the relocation of our facilities to a suitable location. The applicant may contact me directly in order to set up that meeting. Additionally, Note 4 of the Replat indicates that the Upham St. ROW shall be reduced. CTL has existing facilities within the Upham St. ROW as well as the 38th Ave. ROW. These facilities will need to be secured by a new easement agreement or the Applicant needs to work with CTL in order to identify a suitable area for relocation of these facilities. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or if you require any additional info. Thanks Dustin Pulciani, ROW Agent Century Link 700 W. Mineral Ave., Littleton, CO 80120 Cell: 720-520-3133 Dustin.Pulciani@centurylink.com -4/4-E,14 CenturyLink Strorger Connected™ From: Lauren Mikulak [mailto:Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2016 9:21 AM To: Pulciani, Dustin Subject: Referral :: West End 38 Dustin, The Wheat Ridge Community Development Department has received a request for approval of four land use applications for mixed use development at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street (Case No. Case Nos. MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02). Please download the application documents from the City's FTP site using the following credentials. The file is located in the "Community Development" folder, and the file name is "West End 38" 1 r W-est Metro Fire Protection District 433 S. Allison Parkway Lakewood, CO 80226 Bus: (303) 989-4307 Fax: (303) 989-6725 www. westmetrolire.org January 9, 2017 Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 Office Phone: 303-23522845 Fax: 303-234-2845 Imikulak@ci.wheatridge.co.us Re: MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 - West End 38 (Upham and 38h Avenue)) Dear Ms. Mikulak, This property is within the West Metro Fire Protection District (WMFPD). Fire service will be provided as long as provisions of the International Fire Code, 2012 edition, including amendments, are met in development. The water plan, fire hydrant locations, and fire apparatus access are acceptable. The building's fire department connection must be placed within 50-100' of a fire hydrant. · Permits are required from the fire district for core and shell, all work on automatic fire protection systems, all work on automatic fire detection systems, solar photovoltaic systems, radioamplification, underground fire line, and for the storage of hazardous materials. WMFPD reserves the right to provide additional comments/requirements at the time when plans are submitted and reviewed per applicable codes and amendments. If you have any questions contact me at 303-989-4307 extension 513 ore-mail: bkral@westmetrofire.org. Sincerely,<SE-«Le- Bruce Kral Fire Marshal «Whatever It Takes:..To Serve \ M•En STWp 1. f H-be4 K e 1\\\\ \\ I \\696, \\ 1 4 11\\.C\\ \ \ Mu ORm,;·9'0·k,De.rrlk·L\ \ L.1-LUI 1\ \ f w. 3 %* AvENUE «i, 1il«\... -2 *.-- = 6447.City of41 he at Ridge- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT jl City ofWheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 2gth Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 January 6, 2017 Mr. Dennis Sobieski Kimley-Horn 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 RE: West End 38 - 1St review Dear Mr. Sobieski: This letter is regarding the four land use applications you submitted for the West End 38 development at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have reviewed the first submittal of the concept plan, subdivision plat, site plan, and conditional use permit; and I have the following comments. Please also refer to the enclosed redlined copy of the submittal sheets. SUBDIVISION PLAT Comments addressed on Plat submitted made 2/20/17 General 1. Format plat with the following margins: 2" on left, 1" on top, and 14" on right and bottom. 2. Refer to Public Works comments and revise Sheets 3 and 4 to show existing. 3. Lot 3 should be shown as Tract A because it is not a developable area. Add a private streetscape easement to the portion of this tract that is not already encumbered by the access easement. Add a note to Sheet 2 (with the general notes) identifies the purpose of the tract: "Tract A is established for the purpose of providing public and emergency access, utilities, and on-site streetscape amenities." 4. For any easement being vacated, written authorization from the beneficiary will need to be provided. For any easement vacated by separate document, identify as such and provide reception number (i f available). Sheet 1: 5. Add a data table summarizing the area of each lot/tract and the total area of the subdivision. Sheet 3: 1. It does not appear that all exceptions from the title work are shown graphically, including items 18,19,22, and 25. www.ci.wheatridge.co.us CONCEPT PLAN Concept submitted on 2/20/17. General 1. Remove sheets 3 and 4 from the concept plan set and modify sheets 1 and 2 as follows. Sheets 3 and 4 have been removed from the Revised Concept Plan dated 2/17/2017. Sheet 1: 2. Replace all signature blocks on the cover sheet using the City provided "Concept Plan Signature Blocks" which is available on the City website and provides the required language: http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/984/Concept-Plan-Review. The signature blocks have been replaced with the City provided "Concept Plan Signature Blocks". 3. Remove all general notes from the cover sheet-these are not relevant to a recorded Concept Plan. General Notes have been removed from the cover sheet. 4. Update the sheet index to reflect removal of sheets 3 and 4. Sheets 3 and 4 have been omitted from the sheet index. 5. The concept plan will be approved after the subdivision plat is finalized, so the legal description should be a simple Lot/Block description instead of metes and bounds. The legal description has been replaced with a Lot/Block description. 6. Add the following case numbers: WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02. The noted case numbers have been added to the bottom right corner of both sheets of the Concept Plan. 7. Modify the site data table as shown in the attached redlines. Because the Concept Plan is a recorded document, ranges are recommended to allow some flexibility for potential future modifications. The Site Statistics table has been modified per the City's redline comments. Ranges have been included where appropriate. 8. Add the following descriptive information. I have provided some text below based on the information that was provided with the application, but you may need to modify/complete these paragraphs. The descriptive information has been included with only minor modification to address project specific items. Character of Development The West End 38 project will be a 3.3-acre mixed use development that fully embraces the City's Main Street vision for 38th Avenue. The project will feature 155 apartment units, approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space, structured parking, and a mix of outdoor public plazas and gathering spaces. The project will include an emphasis on green building features, residential amenities, and high quality urban design. Per Section 26-1111.C of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code, this concept plan is required in order to allow a drive-up component which is being proposed for a freestanding bank use. Phasing Plan This project will be developed as a single phase, but construction of the two proposed buildings will be phased. The smaller freestanding building will need to be completed prior to construction of the larger building. This will allow the following series of events: Vectra Bank will remain as a tenant in the existing building on site during construction; upon completion of the smaller freestanding structure, they will move into the new .. W building; after moving, the existing building can be demolished, and finally, the proposed multi-story mixed use building can then be constructed. Open Space Concepts Minimum open spaces requirements are proposed to be met for the development site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis. Open space and landscape plans will be provided as part of the site plan set. Drainage Concepts Drainage facilities will be provided for the development site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis. Due to the limited amount of space for above ground storage and/or treatment, an underground detention vault with sand filter is proposed for the site and would be located [wherel. Zoning Compliance The property is zoned Mixed Use-Commercial and will be developed in compliance with the applicable standards of Chapter 26 0 f the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code subject to review through the site planning process. Build-to requirements (Section 26-1105.E) will be met for the site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis. Sheet 2: 9. This graphic is too detailed for a Concept Plan, the purpose of which is to establish overall development concepts. This document is not intended to duplicate the detailed site design information that is provided as part of the site plan set. Please modify the graphic to show only the following features: • Building envelope/footprint only (remove all floorplan details) • Parking (remove counts/dimensions) • Curb/gutter • Access easement to the west • Access point arrows • General vehicular circulation • General pedestrian circulation • Street names and right-of-way widths Refer to the enclosed sketch plan which removes all floorplan details, trees, dimensions, parking counts, and paving details and shows the appropriate level of detail. The Concept Plan graphic has been modified. The detail level has been reduced and only the items noted in the bullet points above have been included in the revised plan. 10. Add a legend. A legend has been added. SITE PLAN Site Plan comments addressed on 3/14/17. Sheet 1 - Cover: 1. Correct the Owners and City certification blocks using the City provided "Cover Items" which is available on the City website and provides the required language: t.,0 http://www.ci.wheatridge.co.us/983/Site-Plan-Review Sheet 1, Cover Sheet has been revised to include the City provided Owners and City Certification Blocks. 2. Remove the Clerk and Recorder certification-this document is not recorded. Clerk and Recorder Certification has been removed from Sheet 1, Cover Sheet. 3. The site plan will be approved after the subdivision plat is finalized, so the legal description should be a simple Lot/Block description instead of metes and bounds. The legal description has been revised and now includes a simple Lot/Block description. 4. In the vicinity map, correct the spelling of"BLVD." The spelling o f BLVD. has been corrected. 5. Add case history with the following case numbers: WSP-16-07, WCP-16-04, MS-16-08, and CUP-16-02. The case history numbers have been added. 6. In the general notes, make the following modifications: v/0 Note 2 - This should refer to West Metro Fire Protection District instead of Wheat Ridge Fire Department. Note 2 has been revised to reference West Metro Fire Protection District in lieu of Wheat Ridge Fire Department. 4 • Note 5 - Remove this note. We will include provisions iii the Subdivision Improvement Agreement that will allow plantings to be escrowed if COs are requested prior to June 1 (April 1 St may still be too early). Note 5 has been removed. 7. Break up the site statistics table so a first table addresses the whole site, and a second table addresses only Lot 1, as follows. Also refer to the comments and questions below which are referenced in bold italic text.The Site Statistics Table has been modified on Sheet 1, Cover Sheet, as indicated below. Site Statistics: Existing zoning Address IAJ Proposed land use Number of dwelling units Primary street [remove reference to note 141 Provided build-to (min 50% within 20') Secondary street [remove reference to note 141 Provided build-to (min 30% within 20') Lot 1 Net Area Lot 2 Net Area Tract A Net Area Total Size of Site Multifamily residential, retail, bank % IBJ % Lot 1 Statistics: Note: Refer to Sheet # for Lot 2 Statistics gl Floor area by use ID.1 21 Residential Retail Parking (Identify this as "garage only" or "surface and garage") Design Elements (show proposed only here, not required) Building height (6 stories/90' max) 89 Building coverage Vehicle Parking tEl Required Proposed Residential: 1 - 2.5 spaces per unit ###(sum of next 3) Standard 155 (min), 388 (max)207 in garage Compact max 20%6 in garage Accessible ((31 6 it# in garage ## in surface lot Retail: 3-7 spaces per 1,000 sq ft ###(sum of next 3) Standard 25 (min), 58 (max)19 in garage 23 in surface lot Accessible #4 2 ## in surface lot On-street: ## Standard ## Accessible ## Bicycle Parking f/1 Required Proposed Residential: 1 space per 10 units 16 ##+ in bike storage ## in racks Retail: 1 space per 20 parking (min 4) 4 ## in racks Setbacks pl Required Proposed Side 0' min 7'-7" Rear 5' min 5' A. Per the City's addressing policy, each of the two buildings will have its own address. All apartments will be assigned a unit number and the retail space will be assigned a suite number. Suite and unit numbers will be approved and assigned through the building permit process (see attached policy for guidance in assigning numbers). I assume that the bank will want to retain its same address (7391 W. 38th Avenue for Lot 2). The existing address at 38111 and Upham is 7323 W. 38tli Avenue, but this can be changed. If you prefer to change the number for Lot 1 it needs to be an odd number in the 732-, 733-, 734- range; and it cannot end in 1. Vectra Bank will maintain the same address of 7391 W. 38m Avenue. Sheet 1 indicates 7323 W. 38th Avenue for the apartment development however it / is the developer's desire to change the address from 7323 to 7333. We request that the City clarify the process for the proposed address change. B. Build-to requirements are being met for the site as a whole and should be moved to the "Site Statistics" table. For the 38th frontage, sum the retail and bank facades. For Upham, confirm that the calculation includes only the ground floor (less the garage opening and area under the bridge)-I calculate *82%. Build-to v/requirements have been moved to the "Site Statistics" table. The 38th Avenue frontage includes the sum o f the bank and the retail facades and exceeds the mininium required 50%. The Upham Street frontage exceeds the minimum 30%. C. Replace the note regarding the Vectra Bank sheets and refer to the sheet that shows the data table for Lot 2 (this table needs to be created and I would V recommend it be on sheet 8 with the Vectra site plan). Table added on Sheet 8 for Vectra Bank information. D. In the "floor area by use" does the "parking" include the parking garage only or surface parking also? Add parenthesis to the table to clarify. This area is the parking garage only. The table now reads "structured garage parking". E. How was a building height of 62' calculated? The City's definition of building height is "the vertical distance measured from the average elevation of the finished grade of the building to the highest point of the roof surface i f a flat roo f I...1." With grade changes, we average the midpoints of each side, and through this method I'm calculating the building height at *54' (to the parapet). If this is correct, please update the table. Average midpoints of each side = 98'-6". making 4 the building height 54'-4". The Lot 1 Statistics table has been updated. F. The parking counts are a bit confusing, in part because the compact and ADA parking is aggregated and itemized. Please make the changes shown in the Lot 1 table above. Also, please note that the compact and ADA requirement ratios are tul incorrect. In particular, the required ADA parking for the residential will need to be at least six spaces. I assume the surface parking spaces (standard and accessible) are designated for retail use. If this is incorrect, please explain. Refer to the updated Lot 1 Statistics table. The parking has been updated to include type ,0/ of parking (garage or surface) and stall type (standard, compact, or accessible). G. At least one accessible parking space must be designated in the surface parking lot for apartments (eg for prospective resident). Two accessible van stalls are provided at the surface parking. One stall is dedicated for the retail function and 1stall is dedicated for the residential (prospective resident) function. Refer to Sheet 4 3, Architectural Site Plan, for clarity. H. It appears the closest accessible parking space for the retail building is over 250' away in the surface parking lot, The retail uses require at least two accessible spaces. On-street parking may need to be reconfigure to accommodate anaccessible space in closer proximity to the building. Three accessible stalls are --- provided for the retail use; one at the garage, one at the west surface parking, and 81,one on-street located on Upham Street near the intersection of 38th and Upham 6-and within 250' of the accessible retail entrances. Refer to Sheet 3, Architectural ,l••47 Site Plan, for clarity. I. It is unclear how bike parking has been provided and accounted for in the table. The table indicates that 16 spaces are provided for the residential use and 2 for the retail. Does this include the bike storage (which appears to far exceedl 6 spaces)? Sheet 11 (landscape plan) appears to show 3 bike racks adjacent to the retail. What is the design of these racks? If these are the standard inverted-u design that would provide 6 spaces. Please clarify what is proposed and adjust the numbers in the table accordingly. Lot 1 Statistics table has been updated to reflect thecorrect parking count. Minimum counts for retail and residential functions have J been exceeded. Refer to Sheet 3, Architectural Site Plan and Sheets 13-14, Landscape Plan, for clarityJ. Setbacks can be added to the Lot 2 table. Information table added to Sheet 8. v' Sheet 2 - Utility Plan: 8. Are the relocated pedestals and transformers proposed to be above ground or below? If above ground, please confirm that all alternative (non street facing) locations have been explored as viable options. The proposed locations of the transformers have been V' reviewed with the dry utility consultant and Xce] Energy. Alternative non street facing locations were explored but determined to not be viable. Sheet 3 - Erosion Control and Grading Plan: No comments from Zoning Division. This sheet removed from submittal set per plan / comment recommendations. Sheet 4 - Architectural Site Plan:9. Provide a legend. A legend has been provided. Refer to Sheets 3-4. 4 10. The north arrow has been cropped, please correct. The north arrow has been corrected. 4 Refer to Sheets 3-4. 11. Provide all property line dimensions. These dimensions should match with the next submittal of the plat. Refer to Sheet 3, Architectural Site Plan. Property line diinensions have been added. Note that the property line dimensions differ slightly from the recently 6 provided Plat submittal. The Plat will be adjusted to match the dimensions noted on Sheet 3. 12. Show the adjoining lot line and access to the west which will be used by the property.See redline. Refer to Sheet 3, Architectural Site Plan. The requested lot lines have been V" illustrated. 13. Along the west fagade, the fill pattern appears to indicate planters along the building, but the elevation sheets identify these as stoops. Please reconcile and clarify i f these are 4 patio areas or planters. See redline. Refer to Sheets 3 and 5. The Architectural Site Plan and East Elevation have been updated to clarify the locations of stoops and planter boxes. 14. The trash enclosure appears to be in a relatively conspicuous location. Is there any opportunity to move it to a less visible location in this area? The trash enclosure has been intentionally placed at the far northwest corner of the site and positioned away from primary and secondary streets. It is also located in close proximity to the residential trashchute and termination room. The current location provides the least amount of public < view while still providing the appropriate level of access for residents and property management. 15. Is the bulbed drive aisle intended as a drop off zone? See redline. Add a label todesignate the intended use. Refer to Sheet 3, Architectural Site Plan. The bulbed drive is v./ intended to be a drop-off/passenger loading area. It has been labeled as such. 16. Refer to the attached addressing policy for guidance in labeling the apartment units (unit numbering guidelines are located iii Section B.1 on page 3). As mentioned above, unit numbers will be approved and assigned through the building permit process. Residential/ dwelling units have not yet been numbered. We expect to have a draft copy of the proposed unit numbering submitted to the City in the month of April, 2017 for the City's review. Sheet 5 - Garage:Co v,4-17. It appears there are 85 spaces on Level 2. Please update the parking count on this sheet ...Klk(the total on the cover sheet is still correct at 207).Sheet 4, Overall Garage Plans, have bee11 modified to indicated the correct parking stall count. These have been coordinated with the Site Statistics table on Sheet 1. 18. Label the garage entry at the southwest corner of Level 1.The southwest garage entry has 1/ been labeled on Sheet 4. The garage entry includes an overhead coiling grate for access control. 19. Modify the label to at the elevator on Level 1 to read"internal access to residentialbuilding." The Level 1 and 2 Garage Plans has been revised to include "internal access to 004' residential building". 20. Label the gate on level B 1 that separates the residential parking from the first 19 stalls. ,/ The Level B 1 access control gate has been labeled. 21. If the first 19 spaces on Level 2 are fulfilling some of the retail parking requirement, please relabel as "visitor/retail." It is currently intended that these 19 stalls serve retail 4 only. Sheet 4 has been corrected to indicate this. 22. The north arrows have been cropped, please correct. The north arrow has been corrected. 4 Refer to Sheets 3-4. 23. Add a legend for, at a minimum, the "SC" designation and the elevation point symbol. A legend has been added to Sheet 4. The small car "SC" designation has been changed to V' compact "C" so that the terminology is consistent with City of Wheat Ridge Section 26- 501 Off-street parking and loading. 7 Sheet 6 - Building Elevations: General Comments 24. Please provide a sample board for all materials on the apartments and garage. AA#mpl board has been provided. Please note that the samples provided are subject to change' due to potential construction pricing implications and mockup review. Exterior finish information can be updated following final finish selection. 25. The architectural detail of the elevations is difficult to read at the 1 /16" scale. Please provide a few enlarged detail views-see redline for select views. Enlarged elevations have been provided on Sheet 7. Note that portions of the building architecture, Vspecifically at the southeast corner of the building, have been revhed. These new elevations have be;h Included tdF reviewEince the City has not yet seen these elevations, we have included the enlarged elevations that we feel express the general intent of the architecture in these areas. 26. Please provide the north elevation retail building. Refer to Elevation 3 on Sheet 5. An 4 elevation of the north side of the retail building has been provided. 27. There are several 3-story expanses ofv,Mical siding. What horizontal treatment is beiproposed to break up the expanse? Refer to Sheets 5-7. VertiBF{ind.:bori,zgn,pl ckifbl 1,ACO joints have been included and are illustrated on the elevations. 28. What cornice treatment is being proposed at the top of the building? Prefinished metal v" coping shall be installed at all parapet conditions. The coping shall be finished to match the adjacent vertical wall finish. Refer to the exterior elevations on Sheets 5-7. 29. What treatments are being proposed to break up the portions of brick? Will there be any reveals, sills, and/or belt courses? Where brick is provided at the first floor, the brick AB71134shall be 08:rbeled (o create a textured pattern. Precast concrete.Aills shall be provided at 4 9' fL"I'¥ typical ulndow openings. A steel window and Juliet balcony surrognd shall be provided for the southeast corner architectural mass at Levels 2-3. Refer to exterior elevations on v 1&2 Sheets 5-7 and the exterior finish sample board for images of similar conditions. 30. What is the proposed finish for the cast in place concrete planters and stoops? The cast- in-place concrete planter boxes shall be angposed non,rete.with.a smootli form finisli.*Ac ? al••01.-U No cladding is intended.460 k'ske>tullt 0-l 31. Is there a base material for the building, or is the brick proposed to extend all the way to &r the ground? The planters obstruct the view of the base in some areas, and in areas without planters it appears to be brick from the ground up. Please clarify. Where brick exists at the first floor, it will extend below grade to the brick ledge within the foundation „ 4- wall. Where glazing exists, metal flashing shall be provided beneath the bottom track of the glazing and terminated behind the sidewalk / grade below. Concrete foundation walls 1 are not intended to be exposed. 32. The only ground floor doors that appear to be rendered as doors are the front entry to th apartment lobby. Please show all proposed doors on each elevation (see below for specific requests related to each fagade). Refer to the updated exterior elevations on Sheets 5-7 for current ground floor doors. 33. What is the grey rectangle that appears in the rooftop of the east and west facades? See redline. If this is a rooftop equipment shelter, please label as such, identify materials, and show in all appropriate facades. Refer to the updated exterior elevations on Shegs 5-7. The residential mechanical design includes rooftop condensers located gLcurbs.' Screen walls are not currently intended and the top of the condensers will be approximately' 1.5? · *bove the parapet line. Condensers are typically situated in the middle of the roof above 8 --hi"* 1the central corridor so in general, the mechanical equipment should etelatively screened t,p * / from view. The exact size and location of the rooftop mechanical equipment has not been ID,04•-/ confirmed since the mechanical design is not yet complete.34. What is the transition between the brick and siding (between the 3rd and 4th floors)?The L# transition between brick and siding will be a precast concrete cap approximately 4" in 4 height with al" overhang over the face of the brick. 35. The trash enclosure detail is insufficient and does not seem consistent with the site plan which calls for opaque steel access doors. Provide all four elevations with specific V" height/width dimensions. Refer to Sheet 6 for trash enclosure elevations. All four elevations have been provided. South Elevation 36. It appears there should be three entries/doors on the south elevation (into retail 1, retail 2, and a hallway). Their locations and materials are not clearly visible on the elevation rendering. Show/label them or confirm they are seamlessly integrated into the glass storefront system as currently rendered. Refer to the updated exterior elevation on Sheet 5. Storefront doors for retail spaces and the main residential building entrance have been identified. 37. What architectural elements will emphasize/identify the retail entries along W. 38th Avenue? Retail entrances shall be of matching anodized aluminum storefront systems. A steel canopy shall extend beneath the Level 2-4 residential building. gnageshall be u/suspended from beneath the steel canopy. The signage can be illuminated. In addition, out3337-seating areas are prqposea at ITTE'west and east sides of the retail area drawing visual interest from the street and directing pedestrian traffic to the retail entrances. 38. What are the two green panels on the west side of this elevation? See redline. They do not appear to correspond to anything on the site plan. Refer to the updated elevation on 4 Sheet 5. These have been removed. 39. Confirm that the five ground floor apartment patio doors are the glass panels with muntins that are shown. See redline. Refer to the updated elevation on Sheet 5. All patio 4 doors exist on the face of the return walls. The glazing illustrated at the residential stoops is vinyl windows. East Elevation 40. Is the entry to the parking garage open (without a door)? Yes, it is open to the street until ,( you reach the secure parking gate illustrated on the site plan. 41. There appears to be some inconsistency between the site plan and the elevations relative to the widths and treatment of the five stoops on this elevation. Please clarify. Refer to V'' the updated elevation on Sheet 5. The stoop locations and configurations have been adjusted for the current unit plan layout and grading information. 42. Based on the site plan, it appears there should be pedestrian doors visible on the east fagade, but it does not appear these have been rendered as such. What is the material for V"each of these doors? Refer to the updated elevation on Sheet 5. Patio / stoop doors typically exist on the return walls. The elevation has been coordinated with the site plan on Sheet 3. 43. What is the proposed material of the transition that appears between the brick and siding at the northeast corner of the building? See redline. The transition between brick and siding will be a precast concrete cap approximately 4" in height with a 1" overhang over the face of the brick. 9 44. What is the grey rectangle at the far north side of the elevation? See redline. Refer to the v" updated elevation on Sheet 5. This has beeii removed. West Elevation 45. It does not appear that the four pedestrian doors on the ground level of the west fa™le 4are shown. Refer to the updated elevation on Sheet 6. Patio / stoop doors typically exist on the return walls. The elevation has been coordinated with the site plan on Sheet 3. 46. Is there any vertical barrier for these four patios? The site plan shows a double line in this location but the elevation appears to indicate they are open. See redline. There is no V' vertical barrier. The stoop is open to the sidewalk beyond. 47. The site plan appears to indicate that a planter or stoop extends to the northern edge of the residential units, but the elevation shows otherwise. Please reconcile. See redline. Refer to the updated elevatio11 on Sheet 6. Tlie stoop and concrete planter box locations V'have been adjusted and coordinated. These elements have been coordinated with the site plan on Sheet 3. North Elevation 48. Section 26-1107 requires that a parking garage be "compatible with adjacent buildings in terms of form, massing, scale, materials, and fagade articulation." The garage design is currently inadequate in terms o f its compatibility. Refer to Sheets 6 and 7 for updated elevations.ikefinished„7etal siding phall be applied to the garage concrete spandrel panels. The area between the spandrel panels will either be open or a 4" steel mesh shall A / 7 be installed for security purposes. It is necessary that the area between spandrel panels Cy x- remain open so that the garage can bematurally ventilated. Co¢¤4 49. It appears that the concrete barrier for Levels-lann are 36" but building codes will require a rail or barrier of at least 42" in height. Refer to elevations on Sheets 6 and 7. / The concrete and metal siding height has been adjusted to 42" to provide the necessary vehicle barrier and fall protection. Sheet 8 - Vectra Bank Site Plan: 50. Provide a legend and north arrow. North arrow has been added to Sheet No. 8. The legend of materials is represented on the Landscape Plan, Sheet No. 13. 51. Provide a complete site data table for Lot 2 which mirrors the Lot 1 table provided on the cover sheet: This has been added per City of WR request. Area by floor Proposed Level 1 SF Level 2 SF Total SF Design Elements Proposed Building height (4 stories/62' max)FT Building coverage SF / % Vehicle Parking Required Proposed Bank: 2-5 spaces per 1,000 sq ft ###(sum of next 2) Standard #it (min), ## (max) ## Accessible 1 ## On-street - ## Bicycle Parking Required Proposed Non-residential: min 4 4 #it in racks 10 52. The right-out curb cut is a single-lane exit and it's width need to be reduced substantially. / This has been addressed with adjustments to the overall site plan, best reflected on the civil plan. ' 53. The accessible parking space does not meet minimum width requirements (16') foravan 4 accessible space and aisle. This has been adjusted per City of WR request. 54. The site plan and landscape plan should be consistent in terms of what areas of the site are paved versus planted. Please reconcile. The plan has been modified per City of WR aiu-64• request.55. Provide additional detail on the proposed materials for specialty paving. Specialty paving 4 is shown on the Landscape Plan, Sheet No. 13. 56. Show bicycle rack locations. The bicycle racks are shown on the Landscape Plan, Sheet ,/c,k£L#. No. 13. 57. Provide the first level floorplan to help explain how the elevations relate to the interior. V"This has been completed per City of WR request. Sheet 9 and 10 - Vectra Exterior Elevations: General Comments 58. Please provide a sample board for all materials. This has been provided per City of WR V request. 59. It does not appear that any of the facades meet the ground floor transparency requirements. Refer to Section 26-1106.D and modify designs accordingly. CSHQA and v,VB met with staff on January 30,2017, with revised elevations and obtained approval of a modified percentage of ground floor transparency. 60. The large expanses of brick on all facades do not meet requirements for articulation or vertical material variation. Refer to Section 26-1106 and modify accordingly. Show any reveals and/or belt courses. CSHQA and VB met with staff on January 30,2017 with revised elevations and obtained approval. Revised elevations are presented herein. 61. Add shadows to convey changes in plane depth. Sheet No. 12 has been added per City of 4 WR request. 62. Confirm the height of rooftop equipment and if/how it will be screened. CSHQA and VB met with staff on January 30,2017 with revised document including the intended VRF rooftop mounted systems. The building parapet will scree11 the equipment for 90-feet along the 38m Avenue street frontage. This was discussed and accepted by staff. Revised TED. elevations are presented herein. 63. Reduce the height of the trash enclosure to 6 feet or provide written justification as to v//why it needs to be taller. This has been completed by City of WR request. 64. Wall signs are permitted only on facades which are adjacent to a public street or major interior drive. Wall signs will be permitted to face south, east, and north. Remove the sign that faces west. A freestanding sign is permitted (max height 7 feet) and could provide a west-facing presence. The west facing sign has been removed per City o f WR request. East Elevation 65. Identify the material in the top right corner. See redline. This has been completed per City o f WR request. South Elevation 4 11 66. The southern faGade is insufficient as a street facing fagade. As mentioned above, this fagade needs to meet the minimum transparency requirements through additional windows (functional or spandrel) or through a customer entrance. See response, Item No. 59. 67. This fagade does not meet building design standards of Section 26-1106, includingrequirements related or articulation and color/texture changes (Ill) and requirements for \/' vertical material variation (C.4). See response, [tem No. 60. 68. Remove the security/utility/service door from this fa¢ade. Due to available utility services, removal of this door is not possible. The door design has been upgraded from 4 Hollow Metal-Painted to Aluminum/Glass storefront which was accepted by staff on the January 30th design meeting. West Elevation 69. The lights under the canopy need to be recessed above the bottom of the canopy/fascia. The lighting fixture is recessed per the electrical submittal, Sheet No. 17 Sheet 11 - Landscape Plan:70. For the next submittal, please complete the landscape plan by showing the locations ofall 4 proposed shrubs, grasses, and perennials. Label the species of all plant material including trees. Updated landscape plan includes locations ofall trees, shrubs, grasses and perennials, and all are labeled. 71. Provide additional detail on the proposed materials for all specialty paving. This may be provided with a material board or spec sheets and images. An image with notes has been provided to illustrate the character for concrete unit pavers. 72. Provide details on the two honey locust trees that are proposed to be kept. Has an arborist been consulted to determine the age and health of the trees and the potential of surviving construction'? The arborist report was provided to Lauren on 3/8/17 via entail. Stone Landscape Architects and Steve Day (arborist) will continue to work with the City on an ongoing basis to resolve concerns regarding the 2 existing honeylocusts intended to be preserved. 73. Provide additional details with elevation/detail views of the tree planters proposed as part of the streetscape. A cross section detail has been provided of the tree planters showing the curb and seatwall edges. 1 Sheet 12 - Landscape Notes: 74. For the next submittal, complete the schedule of plants with abbreviations and quantities. The updated sheets include a complete plant schedule with abbreviations and quantities. 75. If rock or mulch is proposed anywhere, please provide details in the plant schedule. River rock of a minimum size of 1 to 2 inches is preferred, at least 3 inches in depth over weed barrier. A note regarding rock mulch was added to the landscape notes, and is listed 4iii the plant schedule. On the plan rock mulch is shown in parking overhang locations, and may also be used in planting beds in certain locations. 76. In the site data table, change "hardscape" to "nonliving" and calculate the areas of patios/walks/courtyards (there is no required min or max). Add a row for "living" and v'00'calculate the square footage of all on-site planting areas (required minimum is 35% of the 10% = 5,067 sf). The site data table has been updated per the request. 77. Modify the required "usable" percentage to read "75%" instead of"7.5%" The site data v'' table has been updated per the request. 12 78. Modify the tree counts to be whole numbers (remove decimal places). The site data table has been updated per the request. 79. Add a note to the site date table indicating "Per the West End 38 Concept Plan, minimum open spaces requirements are being met for the development site as a whole, rather than calculated on a lot-by-lot basis." The site data table has been updated per the request. Sheet 13 - Photometric Plan: 80. Combine the photometric plans (sheet 13 and 15) into a single plan. 4 Separate plans have been approved. 81. For visual consistency all exterior lights on Lots 1 and 2 need to be utilizing the same kind o f bulbs. Currently Lot 1 indicates LED and Lot 2 indicates metal halide. -mz:*>Led lamps will be provided. 82. Modify the detail notes to read "Proposed fixtures are part of the City street lighting package..." These do not currently exist and will need to be installed by the V'00' development. Note has been modified. 83. Add the mounting type and height to the luminaire schedule. ---/ Luminaire schedule has been modified to include mounting type and mounting height. 84. Add fixture H to the luminaire schedule. Fixture type H has been added to the luminaire schedule. 85. It appears fixtures are missing from the front stoops on the east elevation. See redline. 4 Fixtures have been added/relocated to match backgrounds with a fixture at each stoop. 86. Freestanding and/or waillights need to be added to the entry drive and courtyard which are primary circulation routes for vehicles and pedestrians. A reading of 0 foot-candles V, in this area is unacceptable. In-ground lighting is insufficient and private wall-mounted patio lights may be turned off. See redline. Lighting has been added to entry drive and entrance corridor. 87. The southern elevation (sheet 6) shows 8 wall mounted lights, but this photometric plan v/'shows 5 lights (fixture C) in this area. Please reconcile. See redline. Lighting has been modified with a type C light at each entry (5 total). 88. It appears a ground mounted light (A) is located in a planter bed at the base of the steps at Upham Street. See redline. Type A fixture has been deleted from planter bed. 89. Add a light at the doors that allow a resident to enter the apartments from the parking garage. See redline.4 Light fixture has been added to the plans. Sheet 14 - Lighting Details: 90. Remove "Existing" from the City street details. The word existing remoted for city street details. Sheet 15 - Vectra Photometric Plan: 91. Combine the photometric plans (sheet 13 and 15) into a single plan. Two lighting plans t/' were permitted by City of WR. Sheet No. 18 has been updated.92. There is a foot-candle reading of 0 at the main entrance. This is unacceptable. The lighting plan was amended per City o f WR request. . 93. The foot-candle reading under the canopy (21.7 and 22.2) is in stark contrast to thereadings of less than 1 in the approach lane. This difference needs to be reduced. p/' Adjustments to the lighting content has been made per City of WR request. 94. The lights under the canopy need to be recessed above the bottom of the canopy/fascia. V'' Adjustments to the lighting type and position have been made per City of WR request. 95. There appear to be symbols for two wall-mounted lights on the north elevation, but only v' one "Jl" label. Please clarify. The lighting plan was amended per City of WR request. 96. Confirm that fixture J is the same fixture on Lots 1 and 2. The detail image (on sheet 161dSZZPhappears to be the same, bpt the sp£gififations_listed.in-each.lumiI ' e schedule are / different. The lighting plan was amended per City of WR reques 97. Modify the lamps used in fixture Jtobe consistent with Lot 1 (nc sto be LED bulbs U/.1/ with similar foot-candie readings on both lots). The lighting plan was amended per City 0.40o f WR request. Sheet 16- Vectra Photometric Cut Sheets: 2 0: No comments allul) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT No comments The application was also sent on referral to other city departments and outside agencies. Attached are the comments that have been received to date. Wheat Ridge Public Works: See attached comments and redlines from Dave Brossman dated January 4,2017. Comments regarding the traffic report will be forthcoming. Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority / Economic Development: No concerns, proposed development complies with urban renewal plan. Wheat Ridge Police Department: No concerns. Wheat Ridge Parks Department: Fees in-lieu of parkland dedication will be required for the new residential construction. Wheat Ridge Forestry Division:Comments on the landscape plan will be provided once a labelled and completed landscape plan is submitted. Wheat Ridge Building Division: No comments received. West Metro Fire District: No comments received. Jefferson County School District: See attached comments from Matt Hanks dated December 23,2016. 14 Wheat Ridge Sanitation District: See attached comments and schematic from Bill Willis dated December 16, 2017. Xcel Energy: See attached comments from Donna George dated January 3, 2017 and the subsequent follow-up emails from January 5, 2017. Century Link: See attached comments from Dustin Pulciani dated January 4, 2017. H/heat Ridge Water District: No comments received. Comcast Cable: No cononnents received. This concludes the summary of comments. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me directly. For the next review, please submit the following: • a response to this letter, • one (1) full size hard copy of the plat, site plan, and concept plan, Concept & Plat submitted on 2/20/2017 • digital .pdf files of all resubmittal documents, and • an AutoCAD file of the resubmitted plat. Submitted on 2/20/2017 Sincerely, ile,J Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner CC-case jize t . CRY of W heat 11*}ge- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 March 17,2017 Mr. Dennis Sobieski 0-2»/20 0-j Kimley-Horn 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 RE: West End 38 - 2nd review - Concept Plan and Plat Dear Mr. Sobieski: This letter is regarding the concept plan and plat which you re-submitted for the West End 38 development at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have reviewed the documents and I have the following comments. Please also refer to the enclosed redlined copy of the submittal sheets. SUBDIVISION PLAT General 1. It does not appear that any of my previous comments on the subdivision were incorporated into the second submittal. Please ensure that all relevant comments are distributed and addressed appropriately. 2. For any easement being vacated, written authorization from the beneficiary will need to be provided. For any easement vacated by separate document, identify as such and provide the reception number on the plat. For any easement vacated by separate document after the plat, identify as such and provide the separate document to us as evidence o f the vacation. 3. Provide an updated exhibit showing the existing and proposed right-of-way relative to the proposed right-of-way improvements so we can confirm that the dedication is of sufficient width. All Sheets 4. Format plat with the following margins: 2" on left, 1" on top, and %" on right and bottom. The substandard right margin would result in the plat being rejected by the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder. 5. Update the developer information in the bottom right corner to match on all sheets. Currently Sheet 1 identifies Wazee Partners, and Sheets 2-4 contain placeholder text. 6. Add or update the "Date of Preparation" on subsequent submittals so it is clear which version we are reviewing. www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Sheet 1: 7. In the Owner's Certificate, type in the name of the owner(s) instead of providing a blank. 8. In the legal description for Parcel Four (A), in the 4th line, add a hyphen to "one- quarter'-see redline. 9. In the legal description for Parcel Four (B), in the 5th line, add a hyphen to "one- quarter"-see redline. 10. In the Owner/Subdivider signature block, make the following modifications: a. Type in the name and title of the person who will be signing the plat (in place of the "name" and "as" blank lines). b. Modify the notary language to the City's standard: "...the foregoing instrument was acknowledged..."-see redline. c. Update the year to 2017. 11.It is my understanding that there are multiple owners involved (eg Olive Street Development and Wadsworth Development Corporation dba Vectra Bank). If this is correct, there needs to be two signature/notary lines for owners. 12. Add a data table summarizing the area (in square feet and acres) of each lot, the tract, the ROW dedication, and the total area of the subdivision. 13. Consolidate all general notes to one sheet, either here or on Sheet 2. 14. Wherever the general notes end up, on Sheet 1 or Sheet 2, add a note regarding the purpose of Tract A: "Tract A is established for the purpose of providing public and emergency access, utilities, and on-site streetscape amenities." 15. In Easement Notes 1 and 2, add "of that subdivision" to clarify the note and sheets refer to the E.S. Allen Subdivision and not this plat-see redline. 16. The introduction to Easement Notes indicates the following 6 will be either vacated, terminated or modified, but note 6 creates a new easement. For clarity, modify/reorganize/renumber this section as follows (see redline): Easement Notes 1. Put current Easement Note 6 here which creates the stormwater easement 2. Add this note here: The owner, his successors and assigns grants limited rights and privileges to access and to free movement through those areas indicated as 'public & emergency access,' as illustrated upon this plat. Such grant of easement shall be limited to the owners, tenants, customers, and guests of the owners, and shall furthermore grant access to and free movement through said easements to those entering said easements from similarly recorded easements from adjacent properties and/or from abutting public streets. 3. Put the existing intro text here (The following easements depicted on...) a. Put current Easement Note 1 here b. Put current Easement Note 2 here c. Put current Easement Note 3 here d. Put current Easement Note 4 here e. Put current Easement Note 5 here 17. Increase the font size of the case history case numbers-they are illegible when the document reduced to 11xl 7. 18. In the City Certification, modify the language to read "..,by the City of Wheat Ridge'L see redline. This plat will not go to City Council for review. Sheet 2: 19. Add legend. to Sheet 3: 20. It does not appear that all exceptions from the title work are shown graphically. At a minimum it appears that exception 22 (an access easement across Parcel 4 and 5) needs to be shown and vacated. It is unclear if items 18, 19, and 25 affect the property. Alternatively, provide an updated title commitment that shows these exceptions as removed. 21. Label the hatched 'reservation of non-exclusive access easement' as terminated. 22. Label the 10-foot utility easements on Parcel 3 as terminated. 23. Add the width to the 16-foot cross access/ingress-egress easement that is being terminated-see redline. 24. One of the easements parallel with Upham is drawn with the proposed easement line type but should be shown as existing-see redline. 25. The line between Parcels 4 and 5 appears solid, but should be either the section line or existing lot line type. 26. In the line type legend, add the subdivision boundary. 27. On the parcels to the west identify the zoning as MU-C-see redline. Sheet 4: 28. Add the line type legend to this sheet. 29. Add the detention easement, which is referenced on the cover sheet. 30. Why does the emergency access easement terminate in the parking lot instead of extending to the 24' public and emergency access easement? See redline. 31. Show the adjacent off-site access easement to the west, which will serve the property. 32. The detail is labeled as A, but the reference says B-see redline. CONCEPT PLAN Sheet 1: 1. Increase the font size of the project team-it is illegible when the document reduced to 11 x17. 2. In the site statistics, add "+/-" after each ofthe three floor area totals. 3. In the vicinity map, correct the spelling of"BLVD." 4. In the legal description, remove the last phrase that reads, "per plat recorded...said county" 5. Increase the font size of the legal description-it is illegible when the document reduced to 11 x 17. 6. Increase the font size of the descriptive information-it is illegible when the document reduced to 1 lx17. 7. It appears the signature blocks that were added are simply a screenshot of the City's handout. At a minimum, remove the City seal, handout title, and revision date. 8. It is my understanding that there are multiple owners involved (eg Olive Street Development and Wadsworth Development Corporation dba Vectra Bank). If this is correct, there needs to be two signature/notary lines for owners. 9. Where the signature block says "Insert name of owner..." you need to type in the name, affiliation, and title of the person who will sign. 10. Put the case history within the neatline. W Sheet 2: No comments The resubmittal was also sent on referral to the Public Works Department. See the attached comments and redlines from Dave Brossman dated March 16,2017. Comments regarding the traffic study will be sent under separate cover. Comments regarding the March 15 site plan submittal will be sent next week. This concludes the summary of comments. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me directly. For the next review, please submit the following: • a response to this letter, • one (1) full size hard copy of the plat and concept plan, • digital .pdf files of all resubmittal documents, and • an AutoCAD file of the resubmitted plat. Sincerely, 1-awu»0 Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner CC:casefile 4:. - I City of9-W heatRidge -- PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner FROM:Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE:March 16, 2017 SUBJECT:MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 I have completed my second review for the request to allow for a mixed use redevelopment at the property located at 7391 & 7323 W. 38th Avenue, and 3845 Upham Street received on February 27,2017, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Final Plat Sheet 1 (Cover Sheet): 1. Unless specifically desired, the metes and bounds descriptions for the individual parcels can be removed and replaced with just the JeffCo Book & Page or Reception Number where the deed is recorded. Please note however that per Sec. 26-410 ofthe Wheat Ridge Municipal Code of Laws a metes and bounds for the overall platted boundary shall be required. The overall description shall include a tie to the section (P.O.C. and T.P.O.B.). Previously requested 2. Two typos in the last paragraph of the Owner's Certificate - see redlines. 3. For the EASEMENT NOTES, in an effort to standardize the language used in the removal of the various easements and to clarify the Right-of-Way easements that will be "absorbed" in to the dedication, please note the following: a. Towards the end of the first (intro) sentence, replace the words "VACATED, TERMINATED" with "REMOVED, TERMINATED, AND EXTINGUISHED, " b. No. 1 - should read in part "GENERAL NOTE 8, SHEET 2 OF 4, ARE" . . . - see redlines. e. No. 2 - remove the word "VACATED" and replace with the words "REMOVED, TERMINATED, AND EXTINGUISHED". d. No. 3 - remove the word "VACATED AND TERMINATED" and replace with the words "REMOVED, TERMINATED, AND EXTINGUISHED". e. No. 4 - For the easements that end up lying within the area of ROW dedication, please include the following language in Note #4: "UPON RECORDATION OF THIS PLAT, THE EASEMENTS FOR RIGHTS OF WAY GRANTED TO THE CITY...SHALL BE West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP-TIS Review-2.docx Public Works Engineering March 16,2017 Page 2 EXTINGUISHED BY MERGER OF TITLE UPON RECORDATION OF THIS PLAT." a. (You may want to make a separate Note for the easement in which the area is to be modified). b. No. 6 - should spell "STORMWATER" as one word (two locations in this note). 4. In the CITY CERTIFICATION block - the approval body should be the "City of Wheat Ridge" and not "the Wheat Ridge City Council". 5. In the SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE, PW offers for your consideration for inclusion the phrase "IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE COLORADO STATUTES, CURRENT REVISED EDITION AS AMENDED" with applicable standards ofpractice. 6. Also we note that the Surveyor's seal and signature will be required when ready for Mylar®. Sheet 2 (Quarter Section Breakdown): 1. Per the Municipal Code of Laws: a. The City's published coordinate values must be shown for all City monuments used/shown. b. The platted boundary shall be consistent with the Current City Datum, being a modified ground-based form of the NAD93/92 State Plane system (refer to the City' s Geodetic Checklist). c. The Basis o f Bearings shall be on the Current City Datum. 2. Some of the linetypes on the graphical portion do not correspond to the Legend (e.g., the aliquot linetype). 3. There appear to be a few random lines that have shown up in this submittal - see redlines. 4. Add Note #8 to the General Notes: "TRACT A IS NON-BUILDABLE AND FULLY ENCUMBERED BY AN EASEMENT HEREBY ESTABLISHED FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING PUBLIC AND EMERGENCY ACCESS, UTILITIES, AND ON-SITE STREETSCAPE AMENITIES." 5. PW recommends moving "EXCEPTION PARCEL" callout as shown (it obscures linework beneath) - eliminate area callout here as that info is shown elsewhere. 6. Try 25' sub-units for the scale bar. Previously requested Sheet 3 (Boundary Establishment): 1. Adjust linetypes throughout this sheet to proper type - see redlines. 2. In Parcel 2 the "2 ND EXCEPTION PARCEL 1" text gets a little lost by being separated by the dimension line. Adjust note and/or dimension to join up appropriate notes. 3. Right-of-way note for Parcel 2, east side, has unclear leader - please clarify. 4. Extend easement removal hatching in Parcel 3 to property line - see redlines. 5. In Parcel 1, east side, linework and note leaders somewhat vague - see redlines. 6. At southwest corner ofplan there are two dimensions referencing corners offthe page. It is not clear of what benefit these are - see redlines. 7. Regarding the existing W. 38th Avenue ROW: The fact that this area does not appear as an exception in the title work is insufficient for the plat document. The official City ROW mapping shows 30' of ROW per the Jefferson County West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP-TIS Review-1 Public Works Engineering March 16, 2017 Page 3 Commissioner's Journal B-258. PW suggests Mr. Snodgrass or his designee should investigate this further so the ROW to be dedicated by this plat is properly shown (or the County will reject the plat upon closer inspection). Sheet 4 Lot and Easement Detail: a. The following comment pertains to the 24' wide Emergency Access Easement on the west side of Lot 1 - please add 'tic' marks to points of tangency/curvature where needed. 2. The following comments pertain to the 24' wide Public & Emergency Access and Utility Easement on the southwest portion of Lot 1 : a. Need to add the curve data and line distance for the southern boundary of the easement west of Lot 2. b. PW strongly suggests "cleaning up" the Tract A boundary and easement at the northeast corner of Lot 2. This will simplify geometry (with no change to Lot 2) and eliminate need for Detail A on this sheet - see redlines. Acreages of Lot 1 and Tract A will change modestly. 3. The overall distance of Lot 2 should be corrected - see redlines. 4. Eliminate the "EXCEPTION PARCEL" from this sheet, as it is being vacated as noted on Sheet 3. Verify parcel area is accounted for in the ROW area as necessary. 5. Adjust adjacent parcel callout (Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Marketplace Sub) to open area to eliminate overlap with section tie. 6. PW suggests removing the 24' easement lines and simply adding a Note stating that Tract A is fully encumbered by an Easement as shown on this sheet. Doing this will greatly simplify things plus Detail A can be deleted. 7. If the 24' wide Public & Emergency Access and Utility Easement is to be retained, PW strongly suggests "cleaning up" the corner by Lot 2. The geometry can be simplified and eliminate need for Detail A on this sheet. Please consider the following: a. Start inside radius of 24' easement at corner of Lot 2. A radius of 11.47' will maintain tangency to E-W easement line. b. Offset 11.47' radius of easement by 24' to give outside radius of Tract A as 35.47' (this will retain 24' width of easement throughout curve and maintain tangency to E-W Tract A line). c. Adjust all affected lengths as necessary (red rectangles). Adjust curve data and Lot 1 and Tract A areas as necessary. 8. Remove the "Exception" area and lines from within the ROW. This was dedicated to the City in 1990 and the parcel lines are being removed on Sheet 3, so this should no longer appear on this Proposed Conditions sheet. Be sure and remove any and all references to it as well. 9. Need to show the underground Detention Easement as "STORMWATER DETENTION EASEMENT HEREBY GRANTED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE BY THIS PLAT". 10. Provide a Drain age Easement for the pond outfall to Upham Street. 11. Show minimum 10' wide Drainage Easements for all storm sewer and appurtenances leading to the underground detention facility. West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP-TIS Review-2.docx Public Works Engineering March 16, 2017 Page 4 Concept Plan 1. There is an extra "1" in the PHAC-1 callout for the benchmark on Sheet 1. 2. All other comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Site Plan 1. There is an extra "1" in the PHAC-1 callout for the benchmark on Sheet 1. 2. Please include the following Note #13 on Sheet 2: "3. THE STORMWATER QUALITY DETENTION AREA HEREIN SHOWN AS "PROPOSED DETENTION VAULT" SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTAINED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS." CIVIL ENGINEERING Final Drainage Report/ Plan 1. No Final Drainage Report was provided. Traffic Impact Study 1. Mark Westberg, P.E. is reviewing the Traffic Impact Study, and may have additional comments related to circulation and traffic. Please note that Mark's comments will be forthcoming at a later date and under separate cover. West End 38 Plat-CP-SDP-TIS Review-2.docx City of30- Wheatilige - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 2gth Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 April 3,2017 Mr. Dennis Sobieski Kimley-Horn 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 RE: West End 38 - 2nd review - Site Plan Dear Mr. Sobieski: This letter is regarding the site plan, which you re-submitted for the West End 38 development at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have reviewed the documents and have the following comments. Please also refer to the enclosed redlined copy of the submittal sheets. Sheet 1 - Cover Sheet: 1. Increase the font size of the project team and legal description-they are illegible when the document reduced to 11x17. 2. In the legal description, remove the last phrase that reads, "per plat recorded...said county" 3. It appears the signature blocks that were added are a screenshot of the City' s handout. At a minimum, remove the City seal, handout title, and revision date. 4. It is my understanding that there are multiple owners involved (eg Olive Street Development and Wadsworth Development Corporation dba Vectra Bank). If this is correct, there needs to be two signature/notary lines for owners. 5. Where the signature block says, "Insert name of owner..." please type in the name, affiliation, and title o f the person who will sign. 6. Note 5 indicates that an easement is being granted by the site plan, which is not possible. It is my understanding that an easement is being granted by plat. Please remove or modify this note. 7. In Note 8, modify: "...City and·-(Jewaty of Wheat Ridge." 8. In the site statistics: a. Change the address to 7333 W. 38th Avenue - I will process this request prior to the final approval of the site plan. b. Add the Vectra address: 7391 W. 38th Avenue 9. In the Lot 1 Statistics: a. Update to the note above the table to refer to Sheet 8. b. The on-street parking seems too low-does this include all on-street parking adjacent to Lot 1 on 38th Avenue and on Upham Street? c. Remove setbacks from this table www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Sheet 2 - Utility Plan: No comments Sheet 3 - Site Plan: 10. Please reconcile the property line dimensions along Upham with the subdivision plat. They do not appear to match the most recent version of the plat. Sheet 4 - Garage Plans: No comments Sheet 5 and 6 - Exterior Elevations: 11. In the material schedule, "textured red" seems to indicate that the brick itself is textured, when we want instead to memorialize that the installation will appear corbelled. Change this note to "red with corbelled projections" or something similar to indicate the proposed design. 12. In the east elevation, the planters along the sidewalk rise to a height of approximately 5'6" which is too tall. Modify the design so the planters are kept at a consistent height above the sidewalk or are stepped so they are within a reasonable (pedestrian-oriented) maximum height above the sidewalk. Please provide some justification for the heights proposed in a revised design. See redlines. Sheet 7 - Enlarged Elevations: 13. Add a scale; it appears to be 1' = 1/8" Sheet 8 - Vectra Site Plan: 14. Update the site data table as shown in the redlines. 15. Remove the total square footage box which is already provided in the site data table. 16. Add a radius on the east side of the curb cut-see redlines. 17. Modify the curb cut to restrict left-out movements·-see redlines. 18. Add a legend for, at a minimum, the fill patterns shown in the plan. Sheet 9 - Floor Plans: No comments Sheet 10 and 11- Vectra Elevations: 19. Show the height to the roof deck. 20. It is unclear how the transparency calculations are being made. By my calculations (refer to redlines) the proposed transparency is as follows. Please confirm this is correct or explain your calculations. a. North - 24% b. West - 27% c. South - 42% d. East - 44% Sheet 13 and 14 - Landscape Plan: 21. The plant schedule lists are 0 Jun CHI and 8 PRU CER, but 8 JUN CHI are labeled on the far western property line. 22. The plant schedule lists 6 AME GRA, but there are fewer in the plan. 23. In the site data table, remove the row for street trees. 24. Refer to previously emailed comments regarding street trees (March 20 email): a. For ROW trees, large maturing tree species (such as the honey locusts) require 1000 eu ft soil volume for root zone. This is calculated as length x width x 24" depth. b. For ROW trees, medium maturing tree species require 800 eu ft soil volume for root zone. c. For ROW trees, small maturing tree species require 600 cu ft soil volume for root zone. d. Consider increasing tree root soil volume under hardscape using Silva Cells or similar product for all ROW trees i f soil volumes in planter are substandard e. English oak (Que Rob) have a spread of 35+ft, choose columnar form. f. Hot wings maple (Ace Tat) is low branching and has a 25+ft spread choose upright species. 25. Please confirm the plan for the existing honey locust trees. The last correspondence included comments from the City's Forestry Division, which I emailed to the group on March 20: a. Our Forestry staff has offered the comments below on the honey locust trees and on the ROW trees in general. Obviously we don't arbitrarily encourage removal of mature trees, but we are concerned that the tree preservation zone may be substandard and the longevity o f the trees will be compromised. If the trees will be kept, additional accommodations will be necessary. It's my understanding that our forestry staff spoke with your arborist, but I'm also happy to coordinate a phone call or meeting on site if that would be helpful. Regarding the honey locust trees: b. The tree preservation zone is compromised and below the industry standard. c. Current arboricultural standards recommend 12"distance from tree trunk for every 1" diameter of the tree for the root protection zone. d. Recommend the two planter islands be connected. e. Recommend relocating the bike rake adjacent to the eastern tree to allow for more undisturbed root zone. f. Consider creating a diagonal line for the western tree island on the northwest corner to allow for more undisturbed root zone. g. Stressed trees should not be pruned unless a safety concern exists. h. No additional plantings can occur within the root zone. i. Trees must be fenced and cared for during and after construction in accordance with tree protection criteria. Sheet 15 - Landscape Notes: 26. Remove note 10. Maintenance responsibilities will be outlined in the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. Sheet 16 - Photometric Plan: 27. In the luminaire schedule, fixtures F and J exceed the maximum 18-foot height. 28. The statistics table refers to two zone calculation areas, but it is unclear to what areas these refer. Sheet 17 - Lighting Information: No comments W Sheet 18 - Vectra Bank Photometric Plan: 29. As previously noted, all exterior lights on Lots 1 and 2 need to be utilizing the same kind ofbulbs for visual consistency. Currently Lot 1 indicates LED and Lot 2 indicates metal halide. 30. Add a pedestrian light on the east side of the building where readings are 0 to correspond to the ped light that was added on the east side of the adjacent drive. Addressing: Lot/Building Address: The request to change the address for Lot 1 to 7333 will be processed at the conclusion of the land use applications and prior to the submittal for building permits so that all future documentation can reflect the new address. Suite/Unit Address: Suite addresses are fine as proposed. Unit addresses need to be modified slightly for more logical wayfinding. It is fine to keep all odd numbers consistently on one side o f the corridor and evens on the opposite side o f the corridor. On the upper floors, the unit numbers on the eastern hallway are not sequential, and this is too confusing. Refer to redlines and assign numbers so that users of the directional signs would only need to know the middle number. Public Works comments regarding the traffic study are enclosed. PW comments on the site plan were included with comments from Dave Brossman on the plat and concept plan (dated March 16, 2017). This included only two comments: Site Plan 1. There is an extra "1" in the PHAC-1 callout for the benchmark on Sheet 1. 2. Please include the following Note #13 on Sheet 2: "3. THE STORMWATER QUALITY DETENTION AREA HEREIN SHOWN AS "PROPOSED DETENTION VAULT" SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MAINTANED BY THE OWNER AND SUBSEQUENT OWNERS, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. IN THE EVENT THAT SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IS NOT PERFORMED BY SAID OWNER, THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO ENTER SUCH AREA AND PERFORM NECESSARY WORK, THE COST OF WHICH SAID OWNER, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS AGREES TO PAY. NO BUILDING OR STRUCTURE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THE DETENTION AREA AND NO CHANGES OR ALTERATIONS AFFECTING THE HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE DETENTION AREA WILL BE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS." This concludes the summary of comments. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me directly. For the next review, please submit the following: • a response to this letter, • one (1) full size hard copy of the site plan, and • digital .pdf files of all resubmittal documents including colored elevations. 41 Sincerely, 'n. Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner CC:Patrick Bohler 5 - , City of47 W heat Ridge- PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, AICP, Senior Planner FROM:Mark Westberg, PE, CFM, Project Supervisor DATE:March 22,2017 SUBJECT:West End 38 Traffic Impact Study - February 2017 - 2nd Review I have completed my review of the revised Traffic Impact Study dated February 2017 for the proposed West End development at the northwest corner o f 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have the following comments regarding this submittal: 1. Page 3, Figure 2, Site Plan a. This figure shows the access across from Upham Street being a one-way in only. The remaining figures and calculations show this access functioning as a 31 movement. Please clarify if left outs will be restricted in some way. b. The one-way exit from the bank should be constructed so that it discourages left 6 1 outs. Kimley»>Horn April 7, 2017 Lauren Mikulak City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W. 2gth Avenue, 2nd Floor Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE:096331009 West End 38 Dear Ms. Mikulak: Thankyou for the comments on March 21, 2017 for the above-mentioned project. In an effort to address your comments concisely and simplify your review of the concept plans, we have summarized your comments and our responses below. COMMENT RESPONSE LETTER: 3 RD SUBMITTAL SUBDIVISION PLAT General 1. It does not appear that any of my previous comments on the subdivision were incorporated into the second submittal. Please ensure that all relevant comments are distributed and addressed appropriately. • Response: Noted 2. For any easement being vacated, written authorization from the beneficiary will need to be provided. For any easement vacated by separate document, identify as such and provide the reception number on the plat. For any easement vacated by separate document after the plat, identify as such and provide the separate document to us as evidence of the vacation. • Response: Noted 3. Provide an updated exhibit showing the existing and proposed right-of-way relative to the proposed right-of-way improvements so we can confirm that the dedication is of sufficient width. • Response: Noted All Sheets 4. Format plat with the following margins: 2" on left, 1" on top, and W on right and bottom. The substandard right margin would result in the plat being rejected by the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder. • Response: Minimum margins have been met. 5. Update the developer information in the bottom right corner to match on all sheets. Currently Sheet 1 identifies Wazee Partners, and Sheets 2-4 contain placeholder text. • Response: Developer information has been updated on all sheets. 6. Add or update the 'Date of Preparation" on subsequent submittals so it is clear which version we are reviewing. kimley-horn.com 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 Kimley»>Horn Page 2 • Response: Revision block has been added to sheet 1. Sheet 1: 7. In the Owner's Certificate, type in the name of the owner(s) instead of providing a blank. • Response: At this point in time the exact person who will be signing on behalf of the owner entity is not known. 8. In the legal description for Parcel Four (A), in the 4111 line, add a hyphen to "one-quarter"-see redline: • Response: Addressed 9. In the legal description for Parcel Four (B), in the 5th line, add a hyphen to "one-quarter"-see redline. • Response: Addressed 10. In the Owner/Subdivider signature block, make the following modifications: A. Type in the name and title of the person who will be signing the plat (in place of the "name" and "as" blank lines). • Response: At this point in time the exact person who will be signing on behalf of the owner entity is not known. B. Modify the notary language to the City's standard: ' acknowledged. ."-see redline. • Response: Addressed the foregoing instrument was C. Update the year to 2017 • Response: Year has been updated. 11. It is my understanding that there are multiple owners involved (eg Olive Street Development and Wadsworth Development Corporation dba Vectra Bank). If this is correct, there needs to be two signature/notary lines for owners. • Response: An additional owner signature block has been added. 12. Add a data table summarizing the area (in square feet and acres) of each lot, the tract, the ROW dedication, and the total area of the subdivision. • Response: Data table has been added to Sheet 1. 13. Consolidate all general notes to one sheet, either here or on Slieet 2. • Response: All general notes are now shown on Sheet 1. 14, Wherever the general notes end up, on Sheet 1 or Sheet 2, add a note regarding the purpose of Tract A: "Tract A is established for the purpose of providing public and emergency access, utilities, and on-site streetscape amenities." • Response: Said note has been added to the General Notes. 15. In Easement Notes 1 and 2, add "of that subdivision" to clarify the note and sheets refer to the E.S. Allen Subdivision and not this plat-see redline. m Response: Addressed kimley-horn.com 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 Kimley»>Horn Page 3 16. The introduction to Easement Notes indicates the following 6 will be either vacated, terminated or modified, but note 6 creates a new easement. For clarity, modify/reorganize/renumber this section as follows (see redline): Easement Notes 1. Put current Easement Note 6 here which creates the stormwater easement 2. Add this note here: The owner, his successors and assigns grants limited rights and privileges to access and to free movement through those areas indicated as 'public & emergency access,' as illustrated upon this plat. Such grant of easement shall be limited to the owners, tenants, customers, and guests of the owners, and shall furthermore grant access to and free movement through said easements to those entering said easements from similarly recorded easements froin adjacent properties and/or from abutting public streets. 3. Put tlie existing intro text here (The following easements depicted oii...) a. Put current Easement Note 1 here b. Put current Easement Note 2 here c. Put current Easement Note 3 here d. Put current Easement Note 4 here e. Put current Easement Note 5 here • Response: Easement notes have been revised as requested. 17. Increase the font size of the case history case numbers-they are illegible when the document reduced to 11 x17. • Response: Addressed 18. In the City Certification, modify the language to read " . by the City of Wheat Ridge"-see redline. This plat will not go to City Council for review. • Response: Addressed Sheet 2: 19. Add legend. • Response: Legend has been added. Sheet 3: 20. It does not appear that all exceptions from the title work are shown graphically. At a minimum it appears that exception 22 (an access easement across Parcel 4 and 5) needs to be shown and vacated. It is unclear if items 18,19, and 25 affect the property. Alternatively, provide an updated title commitment that shows these exceptions as removed. • Response: Exception 22 - The document referenced does not depict a plottable location of the property or easement in question and can not be plotted. Exceptions 18, 19 and 25 do affect the subject property. An updated title commitment will be requested and provided. 21. Label the hatched "reservation of non-exclusive access easement" as terminated. • Response: Label has been revised as requested. 22. Label the 10-foot utility easements on Parcel 3 as terminated. • Response: Label has been revised as requested. kimley-horn.com 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 Kimley»>Horn Page 4 23. Add the width to the 16-foot cross access/ingress-egress easement that is being terminated-see redline. • Response: Addressed 24. One of the easements parallel with Upham is drawn with the proposed easement line type but should be shown as existing-see redline. • Response: Addressed 25. The line between Parcels 4 and 5 appears solid, but should be either the section line or existing lot line type. • Response: Addressed 26. In the line type legend, add the subdivision boundary. • Response: Addressed 27. On the parcels to the west identify the zoning as MU-C-see redline. • Response: Addressed Sheet 4: 28. Add the line type legend to this sheet. • Response: Addressed 29. Add the detention easement, which is referenced on the cover sheet. • Response: The detention easement has been added. 30. Why does the emergency access easement terminate in the parking lot instead of extending to the 24' public and emergency access easement? See redline. • Response: Noted, developer does not wish to extend this easement. 31. Show the adjacent off-site access easement to the west, which will serve the property • Response: Off-site easement has been depicted on Sheet 4. 32. The detail is labeled as A, but the reference says B-see redline. • Response: Detail reference label has been corrected. CONCEPT PLAN Sheetl: 1. Increase the font size of the project team-it is illegible when the document reduced to 11 x 17. • Response: The font size has increased. Refer to sheet 01. 2. In the site statistics, add "+/-" after each of the three floor area totals. • Response: "+P has been added to the Floor Area By Use line items. Refer to sheet 01. 3. In the vicinity map, correct the spelling of "BLVD." • Response: The spelling of "BLVD" has been corrected. Refer to sheet 01 4. In the legal description, remove the last phrase that reads, "per plat recorded...said county" kimley-horn.com 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 Kimley»>Horn Page 5 • Response: The last phrase has been deleted. Refer to sheet 01. 5. Increase the font size of the legal description-it is illegible when the document reduced to 11 x17. • Response: The font size has increased. Refer to sheet 01. 6. Increase the font size of the descriptive information-it is illegible when the document reduced to 11 x17. • Response: The font size has increased. Refer to sheet 01. 7. It appears the signature blocks that were added are simply a screenshot of the City's handout. At a minimum, remove the City seal, handout title, and revision date. • Response: The signature blocks were downloaded asa PDFfrom the City'swebsiteforthe 1st review. The City seal, handout title, and revision date have been removed. Refer to sheet 01. 8. It is my understanding that there are multiple owners involved (eg Olive Street Development and Wadsworth Development Corporation dba Vectra Bank). If this is correct, there needs to be two signature/notary lines for owners. • Response: Two signature blocks were added. Refer to sheet 01. 9. Where the signature block says "Insert name of owner. " you need to type in the name, affiliation, and title of the person who will sign. • Response: Owner names, titles, and affiliations are entered. Refer to sheet 01. 10. Put the case history within the neatline. • Response: Case history has been removed from the titleblock and placed in the neatline. Refer to sheet 01. Sheet 2: No Comments With Kimley-Horn, you should expect more and will experience better. Please contact me at (303) 228-2335 or dennis.sobieski@kimlev-horn.com should you have any questions. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. A- Dennis Sobieski, P. E. LEED AP Project Manager kimiey-horn.com 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500, Denver, CO 80237 303 228 2300 b,A, City of47 Wheat 12*lge - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 April 17,2017 Mr. Dennis Sobieski Kimley-Horn 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 RE: West End 38 - 3rd review - Concept Plan and Plat Dear Mr. Sobieski: This letter is regarding the concept plan and plat, which you re-submitted for the West End 38 development at the northwest corner of W. 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have reviewed the documents and I have the following comments. Please also refer to the enclosed redlined copy of the submittal sheets. SUBDIVISION PLAT 1. Because the plat includes right-of-way dedication but is not being reviewed by City Council please modify the City Certification by adding the following text above it. If there is not sufficient room on the cover sheet, the General Notes may be moved to Sheet 2. ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATED INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO hereby accepts the dedication and conveyance to the City of those lots, tracts, easements, and other interests in real property denoted on this plat as being dedicated to the City for public purposes. CITY CERTIFICATION Approved this day of by the City of Wheat Ridge. ATTEST City Clerk Mayor Community Development Director Director of Public Works www.ci.wheatridge.co. us 2. The resubmittal was also sent on referral to the Public Works Department. See the attached comments and redlines from Dave Brossman dated April 18,2017. 3. The subdivision application has been scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on Thursday, May 4 at 7pm. Please note the following deadlines associated with this hearing date: • Thursday, April 20 -Applicant responsibility -Retrieve two public notice signs from our offices and post them on the property (one on each frontage) • Thursday, April 27 -Applicant responsibility -Deadline for resubmittal of revised plat addressing Public Works comments • Thursday, May 4 - 4. Subsequent to review by the Planning Commission and prior to recordation of the plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement will need to be executed between the Developer and the City. This is not a critical path item relative to the PC hearing, but I will provide the SIA for review within the month. CONCEPT PLAN 5. The signature blocks for the owners continues to be an issue. You may need to retype this text as was done for the subdivision plat and in the enclosed example. The name of the signator cannot overlap the signature line on which the owner must sign. Further, it was noted in the subdivision comments that you are unsure who specifically will be signing on behalf of each owner. This concludes the summary of comments. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me directly. Hard copies will not be required with the next submittal; for the next review please submit the following via email: • a response to this letter, • digital .pdf files of all resubmittal documents, and • an AutoCAD file of the resubmitted plat. Sincerely, 1.-alk)-© Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner CC:case file tu - City ol3 Wheat 12*Jge- PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner FROM:Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE:April 18,2017 SUBJECT:MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 I have completed my third review for the request to allow for a mixed use redevelopment at the property located at 7391 & 7323 W. 38th Avenue, and 3845 Upham Street received on April 10,2017, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Final Plat Sheets 1 (Cover Sheet): 1. The Surveyor's seal and signature will be required when ready for Mylar®. 2. In the Subdivision Data Table, add a "Square Footage" column. Also, re-verify areas as configurations have changed. 3. All other comments have been adequately addressed for Sheet 1. Sheets 2: 1. Add "POINT OF COMMENCEMENT" to South h Corner callout. 2. All other comments have been adequately addressed. Sheets 3: 1. All previous comments have been adequately addressed. Sheet 4 Lot and Easement Detail: 1. Add "POINT OF BEGINNING" to the appropriate property corner. 2. Pertaining to the 24' wide Public & Emergency Access and Utility Easement on the southwest portion of Lot 1, Tract A is fully encumbered by the PUBLIC & EMERGENCY ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT by General Note #9 on Sheet 1, so this easement boundary line, the 24' wide callout, curves C6 and C7 in the Curve Table, and associated Detail "A" are no longer needed. 3. Pertaining to the Stormwater Detention Easement on the northerly portion of Lot 1, the width of the east end of the easement is 10' while the west end is 40.54', so by just eliminating the width callout in the easement note it helps clean this up. 4. Verify all areas are correct and in agreement with the Data Table on Sheet 1 as configurations have changed. West End 38 - Plat Only_Review-3.ltr.docx A Public Works Engineering April 18, 2017 Page 2 5. Verify Sidewalk easement dimensions meet min. text height. 6. All other comments have been adequately addressed. Concept Plan 1. All ofprevious PW comments have been satisfactorily addressed. Site Plan 1. No Site Plan was received with this submittal. West End 38 - Plat Only_Review-3.ltr.docx 6 1 City of1 Wheat 11®}ge UN\PA Air tgy' --00'--COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 April 17,2017 Mr. Dennis Sobieski Kimley-Horn 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 RE: West End 38 - 3rd review - Concept Plan and Plat Dear Mr. Sobieski: This letter is regarding the concept plan and plat, which you re-submitted for the West End 38 development at the northwest corner of W. 3 8th Avenue and Upham Street. I have reviewed the documents and I have the following comments. Please also refer to the enclosed redlined copy ofthe submittal sheets. SUBDIVISION PLAT 1. Because the plat includes right-of-way dedication but is not being reviewed by City Council please modify the City Certification by adding the following text above it. If there is not sufficient room on the cover sheet, the General Notes may be moved to Sheet 2. Acknowledged; the Plat to be submitted at a later date with all comments addressed. ACCEPTANCE OF DEDICATED INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO hereby accepts the dedication and conveyance to the City of those lots, tracts, easements, and other interests in real property denoted on this plat as being dedicated to the City for public purposes. CITY CERTIFICATION Approved this day of by the City of Wheat Ridge. ATTEST City Clerk Mayor Community Development Director www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Director of Public Works 2. The resubmittal was also sent on referral to the Public Works Department. See the attached comments and redlines from Dave Brossman dated April 18,2017. Acknowledged: the Plat to be submitted at a later date with all comments addressed. 3. The subdivision application has been scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Commission on Thursday, May 4 at 7pm. Please note the following deadlines associated with this hearing date: • Thursday, April 20 -Applicant responsibility -Retrieve two public notice signs from our offices and post them on the property (one on each frontage) • Thursday, April 27 -Applicant responsibility -Deadline for resubmittal of revised plat addressing Public Works comments • Thursday, May 4 - The Plat to be submitted at a later date, in conjunction with the above schedule. 4. Subsequent to review by the Planning Commission and prior to recordation of the plat, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement will need to be executed between the Developer and the City. This is not a critical path item relative to the PC hearing, but I will provide the SIA for review within the month. Acknowledged CONCEPT PLAN 5. The signature blocks for the owners continues to be an issue. You may need to retype this text as was done for the subdivision plat and in the enclosed example. The name of the signator cannot overlap the signature line on which the owner must sign. Further, it was noted in the subdivision comments that you are unsure who specifically will be signing on behalf of each owner. The name of the signator is now below the signature line. We have received confirmation from the owner that the signator names are accurate. Refer to sheet 01. This concludes the summary of comments. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact me directly. Hard copies will not be required with the next submittal; for the next review please submit the following via email: • a response to this letter, • digital .pdf files of all resubmittal documents, and • an AutoCAD file of the resubmitted plat. Sincerely, Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner tu ,&44'City 01 Ci,+Pt.c W heat Ilidge - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 April 25,2017 Mr. Dennis Sobieski Kimley-Horn 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 RE: West End 38 - Civil Review Dear Mr. Sobieski: This letter is a response to your submittal of civil construction plans, drainage report, and SWMP for West End 38. We have reviewed the submittal received April 10,2017 and have the following comments. Review comments from Public Works are enclosed as well and are summarized at the end ofthis letter. General Comments: 1. Update the plans to reflect the recent decision to remove the honey locust trees. 2. Provide irrigation plans. 3. Provide the details for all furnishings in the ROW, including pedestrian lights, street lights, trash cans, benches, etc. The Public Works Department completed a thorough review of the plan set. See attached comments and redlines from Dave Brossman dated April 25,2017 as well as the comments from Bill LaRow dated April 25,2017. This concludes the summary of comments. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please feel free to contact any of us directly. Please copy me on any resubmittal of the civil documents. Sincerely, C (7) 9*1 Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner CC:West End 38 case file www.ci.wheatridge.co.us . City ofg,v *'heat 12*lge*4- PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner FROM:Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE:April 25,2017 SUBJECT:MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 I have completed my review of the 3rd submittal for the request to allow for a mixed use redevelopment at the property located at 7391 & 7323 W. 38th Avenue, and 3845 Upham Street, also being the 1 St submittal of the civil const. plans, SWMP, and FDR, received on April 10,2017. The 3rd review plat comments were previously returned on April 1801. I have the following comments pertaining to the civil documents: CIVIL ENGINEERING Final Drainage Report Final Drainage Report (Narrative) 1. On page 9 under the Detention Criteria section: a. Please remove the words "for disturbed areas" from the first sentence, as these requirements apply to the entire site (not just the disturbed areas). 2. While it is acknowledged that the system as designed will function and provide adequate water treatment, PW remains concerned about the long-term maintenance of the system. As such, PW highly recommends the First Defense unit be moved from the currently proposed location to the location of the upstream manhole Al -3. (Plus if the device is used upstream of the vault, only the 100-year volume is required (NO WQCV will be required). 3. Going right along with comment #2 above, the vault volume could be reduced by 0.10 acre-feet (the WQCV) if the First Defense WQ device was located upstream rather than downstream. The City' s criteria allow for the elimination of the WQCV requirement if a proprietary WQ device is utilized upstream of a detention facility. 4. Please provide an explanation as to how the roo f drains will direct runoff into the storm system/vault. Final Drainage Report (Appendix) 1. On the Time of Concentration - Proposed Basins worksheet, rather than using the (conservative) Tc of 5 minutes, please fill in all o f the lengths, slopes, and coefficients so the actual time of concentration is known. 2. Same comment for the proposed 5-year and 100-year CIA Runoff Calculation West End 38 CivilConst]Nans FDR Review-3.ltr.docx LA Public Works Engineering April 25,2017 Page 2 worksheets. 3. On the Inlet in a Sump or Sag Location (UDFCD) worksheet for Inlet A5-1, Inlet A5-1 is shown as a CDOT Type 13 on the Construction Plans rather than the Type R used on this worksheet. 4. On the 5-Year event Profile Report furthepiperun A3-1 to Al-5, the Civil Construction Plans show a grade of 1.14% for this pipe run and there would certainly be flow; please modify. Same comments for the 100-year for this same pipe run. 5. It appears there are duplicate pages for the FIRM, Soil Survey and Map information. 6. Pages 14-20 are duplicated further to the back ofthe Report (pages 82-88). 7. The following comments pertain to page 91 of 91 (Detention Vault Detail): a. Note #1 directs the reader to the structural plans for vault design. However, some level of detail regarding the design of the vault must be included in this Report. For example, detailed info regarding the proposed "Sand Filter" system must be discussed in the Narrative portion and sufficient details included in this Appendix so the reader understands the intent of the WQ design and functionality of the system. An indoor sand filter is an unusual design, and we need more info regarding this. b. On the plan view: i. The 48" x 60" access panel must be by the inflow (where the most sedimentation will occur). In addition, a second access will be needed over by the "weir" that flows into the 1' trickle channel as that area will also tend to collect sediment. ii. Provide a detail showing the design of the "weir" and include the elevation at the location of the "weir" above the trickle channel. iii. The Drainage Plan shows the storm sewer inflow in a different location than this sheet does. c. On the profile view: i. All of the inverts do not seem to correlate to one another. For example, the INFLOW PIPE invert points to the inside top of the vault but the invert appears to be 4.75' lower. And the apparent vault bottom invert is only 1' below the inflow pipe invert, etc. ii. The Report states that the vault invert EL = 5424.28. The "Garage" elevation of 5426.58 appears to be the invert IN. Please modi fy this or clarify what the "Garage" invert elevation of 5426.58 represents (i.e., invert IN). iii. Please provide both inside and outside dimensions for vault. iv. The barrier "walls" separating the forebay from the main portion of the vault and where the main portion flows into the micro-pool need to be shown on the profile view (with dimensions so the reader understands what is proposed). d. Need to show on both plan and profile views the location where the restrictor plate is to be employed (i.e., at the outfall). Final Drainage Plan (Sheet C10.0) 1. As stated above, it is acknowledged that the system as designed will function and provide adequate water treatment, PW remains concerned about the long-term maintenance of the system. As such, PW highly recommends the First Defense unit be moved from the West End 38 CivilConstPlans FDR Review-3.ltr.docx Public Works Engineering April 25,2017 Page 3 currently proposed location to the location of the upstream manhole A 1 -3. (Plus if the device is used upstream of the vault, only the 100-year volume is required (NO WQCV will be required and the size of the vault will be reduced). 2. Show (approximately) how the roof drains will enter the storm system. Civil Construction Plans Sheet Cl.0 (Cover Sheet): 1. The benchmark provided is a perfectly legitimate BM for use with GPS. However, since it is more than 34 of a mile away for any on-site personnel not using GPS, i.e., for folks using a level or laser on-site, PW suggests you consider providing a closer BM such as establishing an elevation on one or more property pins for use by on-site personnel. Sheet Cl.1 (General Notes): 1. City of Wheat Ridge General Notes #21 and #22 seem to have extraneous spaces that make the sentences rather broken up. Please remove these extra spaces. Sheet C2.0 (Site Demolition Plan): 1. Identify the City's warning siren at the NW corner of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street. It's not a small item to remove and relocate and should be called out. 2. Please modify the text in Note #13 to include street cuts as indicated on the redlined sheet. 3. Demolition must include the existing ADA ramps on the NE corner of W. 38th Avenue & Upham St. (which are going to be re-constructed with this project). 4. Please add the following two Notes to this sheet: "15. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK). 16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PROPER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303.235.2861) PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY." Sheet C2.1 (Site Layout Plan): 1. There is some landscaping text by the proposed Vectra Bank that is obscuring one or more street cuts. Please relocate this text to the southeast to show the linework currently hidden underneath. 2. Identify the City-standard RX164 LED Streetlight to be constructed on the plan view. 3. Crosswalk and stop bar striping must be 3M tape, 24" in width, 6' in length, and spaced 24" between stripes. West End 38 CivilConstPlans FDR Review-3.ltr.docx Public Works Engineering April 25, 2017 Page 4 4. Stop bar needs to be 24" wide 3M tape, 20' in length, and be located 4' from crosswalk. 5. A new ADA ramp will need to be constructed at the NE corner of W. 38th & Upham as the existing directional ones are being demolished with this project. 6. Please add the following two Notes to this sheet: "9. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK). 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PROPER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303.235.2861) PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY." 7. In the Legend, specify the streetlight City-standard (RX164 LED), and refer the reader to the sheet where the detail can be found. 8. Comments from Kelly Rosson, ADA Coordinator: a. Ensure the parking garage has sufficient Accessible parking to cover the amount of housing. b. By the west side parking lot, make sure there is minimum 4' passing between sign. One sign should state Van accessible parking. c. On the north side of the proposed bank, the van access landing should be on the right. Consider moving this to the other island. Dimension can be 8' parking, 8' van accessible landing. d. On the east side of the main W. 38th Avenue entrance, need to remove the patterned concrete at the top of the ADA ramp landing. e. On the Upham Street side: i. The provided sign needs to be a "Van Accessible" sign. ii. The accessible symbol must be in the parking area rather than in the landing zone. Sheet C3.1 (Grading Plan): 1. No comments this sheet. Sheet C3.2 (Grading Plan): 1. No comments this sheet. Sheet C4.2 (Overall Utility Plan): 1. Please add the following two Notes on this sheet: "9. NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR: IF MORE THAN THREE (3) STREET CUTS OCCUR WITHIN 250 LINEAR FEET, ADDITIONAL MILLING/OVERLAY REQUIREMENTS WILL APPLY. REFER TO THE TERMS OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (THAT MUST BE OBTAINED West End 38 CivilConstPlans FDR Review-3.ltr.doex Public Works Engineering April 25,2017 Page 5 FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, 303.235.2861, PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK). 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE PROPER ROW CONSTRUCTION PERMITS FROM THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS (303.235.2861) PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY." Sheet (6.1 (W. 38th Ave - Plan & Profile): 1. It's fine to include the "EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE". However, they also need to show the CURRENT GRADE AT EXISTING FLOWLINE. If the proposed flowline is changing more than 0.10' from existing flowline (at the same alignment), then cross-sections on 25' stations extending from the existing crown to 10' behind the proposed curbing shall be required. Sheet C6.2 (Upham St. - Plan & Profile): 1. It's fine to include the "EXISTING GRADE AT CENTERLINE". However, they also need to show the CURRENT GRADE AT EXISTING EOA. Ifthe proposed flowline is changing more than 0.10' from existing edge of asphalt (at the same alignment, not at the bump-outs), then cross-sections on 25' stations extending from the existing crown to 10' behind the proposed curbing shall be required. Sheet C7.1 (Storm Sewer Plan & Profile): 1. While it is acknowledged that the system as designed will provide adequate water treatment, PW is concerned about the long-term maintenance of the system. As such, PW highly recommends the First Defense unit be moved from the currently proposed location to the location of the upstream manhole Al -3. This manhole also lies outside the parking garage structure with great access for a vac-truck, PLUS, it's upstream and will collect the majority of the sediments & pollutants (which will minimize the maintenance ofthe vault where the access will be far more difficult). 2. PW also acknowledges that a structural engineer will be providing plans for the vault. However, specific design details necessary to ensure proper functionality of the vault must be included in these construction plans prior to approval. Typical info will be sufficient elevations, dimensions, weir(s), orifice plate design & location, etc. A detail sheet needs to be included with the plans and a reference to that detail sheet added to Sheet 7.1. Sheet C7.2 (Stonn Sewer Plan & Profile): 1. On the plan view, some of this text should be moved to the left of the storm sewer so the view is not so cluttered that all the text runs together. Sheet C7.3 (Storm Sewer Plan & Profile): 1. No comments this sheet. Sheet C8.1 (Standard Details): 1. No comments this sheet. West End 38 CivilronstPlans FDR Review-3.ltr.docx Public Works Engineering April 25,2017 Page 6 Sheet C8.2 (Standard Details): 1. Please remove the old City-detail for CDOT Type lA ADA ramps.. Due to ever- changing ADA requirements the City no longer uses its own details but instead relies upon the current CDOT M-608-1 standards. Include the latest M-Standard sheets for ADA ramps ( 2. Need to include the following City-Standard Details: a. S-E01 HMA, HOT MIX ASPHALT b. STREETLIGHT e. STREETLIGHT POLE BASE d. PEDESTRIAN LIGHT e. PEDESTRIAN BASE f. F PULL BOX DETAIL Sheets C8.3 & C8.4 (Standard Details): 1. No comments these sheets. Sheet C8.5 (Standard Details): 1. Please remove all of the CDOT ADA Ramp sheets and swap them out with the latest version of the CDOT M-608-1-curb-ramps sheets (dated 02/23/2017). Sheet C8.6 (Standard Details): 1. The crosswalk striping needs to be modified to 24" wide 3M tape 6 feet in length, spaced 24" apart. Sheets C9.1 - C9.4 (Erosion Control Sheets): 1. Please be advised that all Erosion and Sediment Control sheets and information will be reviewed by Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager (303.235.2871) and addressed through his review of the Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). 2. Please add the following Note to Sheets C9.1 - C9.4: "3. REFER TO THE APPROVED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN (SWMP) FOR ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS." Landscape Plan: 1. This sheet needs to be moved from its current location in the middle of the erosion control sheets to either the back of the plan set by the Drainage Plan, or up front right behind the Notes Sheet. Sheets C9.4 - C9.7 (Erosion Control Details): 1. Please be advised that all Erosion and Sediment Control sheets and information will be reviewed by Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager (303.235.2871) and addressed through his review of the Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP). Sheet C 10.0 (Drainage Plan): 1. PW acknowledges that the system as designed will function and provide adequate water treatment, PW remains concerned about the long-term maintenance of the system. As such, PW highly recommends the First Defense unit be moved from the currently proposed location to the location of the upstream manhole Al -3. (Plus if the device is West End 38 CivileonstPlans FDR Review-3.ltr.doex Public Works Engineering April 25,2017 Page 7 used upstream of the vault, only the 100-year volume is required (NO WQCV will be required and the size of the vault will be reduced).. Stormwater Management Plan 1. Bill LaRow, Stormwater Program Manager is reviewing the Stormwater Management Plan. Please note that Bill's comments will be forthcoming under separate cover. OTHER REQUIREMENTS: 1. Subdivision Improvement Agreement: Prior to the issuance of any Building or Right-of-Way Construction Permits or the commencement of any construction activities, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) shall be executed by the project owner/developer. The project owner/developer will need to contact the Dept. of Community Development at 303.235.2846 to obtain a copy of the SIA. Please note that an approved engineer' s itemized cost estimate for the public improvements will be included in the SIA (refer to Other Requirement #6 below). SIAs are recorded at the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office along with the Final Plat. 2. Engineer's Itemized Cost Estimate: Prior to recording of the Final Plat an Engineer's Itemized Cost Estimate (EICE) for the public improvements shall be submitted for review and approval. The amount of the approved EICE will be referenced in the SIA and used for the Performance Guarantee (see #3 below). Please include a EICE for review with the next submittal, and any written price quotes that have been obtained should be included. 3. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee: Prior to the issuance of any Building or Right-of-Way Construction Permits, or commencement o f any construction activities, an itemized engineer' s cost estimate shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (ILOC) in the amount of reflecting the total amount of the approved cost estimate plus 25% (125% ofthe total estimate) shall be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval at the time of SIA submittal. The ILOC shall remain in force for the entire duration ofthe project, and the City reserves the right to request the ILOC be renewed if deemed necessary. A photocopy ofboth the itemized cost estimate and ILOC will be attached to the SIA and recorded at the county. 4. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing: a. ROW Permits. Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way (ROW), the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and West End 38 Civil('onstPlans FDR Review-3.ltr.docx Public Works Engineering April 25,2017 Page 8 respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications b. Licensing. All work within the public Right-of-Way shall only be performed by a municipally-licensed contractor. 5. Pre-Construction Meeting: Prior to commencement of any construction activities the contractor shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with the city of Wheat Ridge public works at 303.235.2861. The contractor shall be responsible for contacting all applicable utility districts for this meeting. 6. Drainage Certification/ As-Built Plans/ SMA and O&M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate o f Occupancy for the subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: Upon completion ofthe drainage improvements, the Engineer-o f-Record shall provide to the City of Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter (DCL) stating that the overall site grading was completed per the approved Grading and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed per the approved construction plans and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The DCL shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As-Built Plans on the Current City Datum for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. b. As-Built Plans: The following items shall be included in the As-Built Plan prior to City acceptance: i. Storm Sewer (this info referenced in DCL) 1. Detention/WQ pond volume (sufficient spot elevations for engineer to calculate the volume). 2. Detention/WQ pond Outlet Structure elevations. 3. Manhole, rim and invert elevations. 4. Drop Inlet, gate and invert elevations. ii. Lighting (within Public ROW only) 1. Streetlight locations. 2. Pedestrian light locations. 3. Pull Box locations. 4. Electric meter location(s). Three (3) copies of the "As-Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: West End 38 CivilConstplans FDR Review-3.ltr.doex Public Works Engineering April 25, 2017 Page 9 i. One (1) hardcopy is to be signed & sealed on 24" X 36" bond paper, and ii. Two (2) electronic files are to be delivered on DVD/CD-ROM as follows: 1. One (1) file in AutoCAD 2015 DWG or older format, AND 2. One (1) file in PDF format (of the signed & sealed sheets). 7. Information pertaining to the Public Works development requirements, Site Drainage Requirements, the City's Street Construction Standards & Details in AutoCAD® DWG format, ROW maps, and City-based coordinate and land surveying information (i.e., Current City Datum), is all available on the Public Works, Development Review page of the City o f Wheat Ridge website at: www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Please include one PDF and one AutoCAD (2015 or older) DWG file of the Final Plat and one PDF of all the revised Civil Documents with the next submittal. West End 38_Civi]ConstPlans_FDR_Review-3.ltr.docx ¥ City ofYp'- W heat RE]ge -- PUBLIC WORKS STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29th Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: 303.235.2857 To: Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer From: William C. LaRow III, Stormwater Quality Program Manager Date: April 25,2017 Subject: Proposed retail stores at W. 38th Ave and Upham St. Wheat Ridge CO 80033. I have reviewed the first submittal of the Stormwater Management Plan and engineering drawings dated March 28th 2017 and I have the following comments: General Comments: 1. Reminder: Prior to receiving a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) the proposed post BMPs (Extended Detention Pond) require to have both a signed Stormwater Maintenance Agreement (SMA) and an Operations and Maintenance (0&M) Plan. 2. Remove the Soils report, summary and referencing the report is sufficient. 3. Remove the Flood Plain Map (FIRM) 4. Prior to approving this SWMP the City will need a copy of the CDPHE Construction Discharge permit. 5. All proposed best management practices (BMPs) stated within the narrative need to have UDFCD construction detail with the SOP narrative reference where stated in the text. 6. Many of the proposed BMPs called out in the narrative will be overlooked by the contractor, it is important that the contractor knows up front his responsibilities. I suggest for the purpose of clarity and emphasis to creating individual sections, simple cut and paste of what you have already, To add to what you may already have I have added a few suggested text (italics and underlined) based on the City's expectations : a) Stockpile Management Stockpile Manasrement will be used when soils or other erodible materials are stored at the construction site. Construction sequencine will be utilized to prevent stockpiles from bein£ stored near natural or manmade stormwater convevances. (MM-2 Stockpile Management) b) Temporary Stabilization (EC-01 Surface Roughening, EC-02 Temporary Seeding, EC-06 Rolled Erosion Control Products, EC-08 Temporary Outlet Protection, EC-12 Check Dam) c) Vehicle Tracking Controls - (SM-03 Construction Fence, SM-04 Vehicle Tracking Control, SM- 06 Stabilized Staging Area, SM-07 Street Sweeping) www.ci.wheatridge.co.us U:\Land Use Cases\Land Use Cases\WSP - Site Plan\WSP-16-07 - West End 38\Review 4 - Civils\SWMP first submittalComments042417.docx L " d) Management of Contaminated Soil (Is there any contaminated soil onsite?, If not state this with a reference of how this was determined. e) Loading and Unloading Maioritv of deliverables will be delivered to the SSA. Handlinp Areas that generate waste or residual pollutants require either pollutants fully cleaned up immediately or covered. Spill kits are to be located in proximity of areas of loading and unloading operations. (SM-05 Stabilized Staaing Area, MM-3 Good Housekeepinj: Practices). f) Outdoor Storage The Contractor will update the locations of where all chemicals are stored on the appropriate civil drawings. All chemicals will be protected from the elements. (S-01 Covering Outdoor Storalze and Handlinj:, S-02 Spill Prevention Containment and Control). Give details ofhow the chemicals will be protected from the elements. State that a Spill kit(s) will be in proximity to all areas storing chemicals. g) Vehicle and Equipment maintenance and fueling All vehicles and equipment will be inspected during the SWMP inspections: anv leaking vehicles will be documented with an explanation of cleanup action and what measures were taken to prevent future discharRes from leakinfr vehicles and equipment. (S-05 Good Housekeeping, S-07 Vehicle Maintenance, Fueling, and Storaize) h) Significant dust or particulate controls Fugitive Dust and Wind Erosion Controls will be used to mitivrate erosion caused b¥ wind. Inactive areas will be surfaced roughened to reduce wind erosion. Duringi dry and wind¥ conditions waterinH trucks will be used to water exposed, un-vesretated areas with potable water to control fupitive dust and wind erosion. An effort shall be made to use onlv the amount of potable water required for these operations so as not to create muddv conditions, runoff, and/or noticeable erosion. (EC-14 Wind Erosion-Dust Control) i) On-site Waste Management (industrial and non-industrial) Contractor will provide approved waste management containers, establish proper building material staging areas, designate paint and concrete washout areas. (MM-03 Good Housekeeping) j) Concrete Truck/Equipment Concrete washout areas (CWA) shall be placed at least 100 feet from drainaHe convevances. If a dug concrete washout is utilized (mobile tYpe "eco pan" units mav be an allowed use if prior approval b¥ the Cit¥ of Wheat Ridge Entineeringi Division is obtained), a compacted earthen berm in accordance with the BMP specification/detail shall enclose the Concrete Washout Area. All cleaning operations involving concrete waste includin£ but not limited to Concrete truck/equipment washing, includinp chutes, fixtures and equipment will be done in an approved CWA. (MM-1 Concrete Washout Area, MM-3 Good Housekeepin*) k) Materials Handling (S-01 Covering Outdoor Storage and Handling Areas, S-02 Spill Prevention Containment and Control, S-05 Good Housekeeping) 1) Dewatering Operations (SM-09 Dewatering Operations) m) Snow and Ice Removal (S-10 Snow and Ice Management) Narrative Comments 1. Under Proposed Sequence for Major Activities -Give details of the how the demolition is being phased and how this effects the areas of disturbance. Based on this phasing there needs to be a plan sheet for the demolition phase. Refer plan sheet comment #1. 2. Under Dewatering section why is groundwater not a concern, you don't expect to excavate down below 8 feet? 3. Site access what is being proposed for controlling site access? 4. Need to state to the contractor to notify the City prior to work beginning. 5. Under the potential pollution section, need to be specific on what BMPs are being proposed and reference the appropriate UDFCDs detail and SOP narrative, refer to general comment #5. If proposed BMPS are later in the SWMP state where. 6. Where is the landscape irrigation return flows? Irrigation return flows are usually associated with an irrigation ditch. 7. Under uncontaminated groundwater section what is COPS permit? I am assuming CDPHE 8. Under Administrative Controls add under sediment sources include "perimeter" with offsite work. 9. Go into more detail what you mean by perched water or surface springs. If this is referring to water filling in trenches and/or excavations the City considers this as dewatering operations therefore UDFCDs dewatering details and SOP is required. Clarify what this statement is applicable too. 10. Under vehicle tracking - revise clean up to be done immediately, refer to general comment # 6 11. Under Structural Practices - The city has adopted UDFCDs detail and SOPs, refer to general comment #5 12. Under Non-structural - If silt fence or rocks socks are ripped they need to be replaced and not repaired. 13. Under Material Handling and Spill Prevention - Add that all chemicals will be stored in the Stabilized Staging Area and will have a spill kit in proximity. A sump is not acceptable, a Concrete Washout Area is to be installed and maintained per UDFCDs MM-1 Concrete Washout Area. Refer to general comment #5. 14. Under Final Stabilization reference the approved Landscape plan for all impervious areas permanent stabilization. Drawing Comments: 1. The demolition phase(s) need to be separate sheets one for the initial demolition and one for the demolition of the bank when the new bank is ready. 2. The initial sheet should reflect the clearing and grading operations and needs to show the following at a minimum and be based on the demolition phasing: a. Existing and proposed contours based on the demolition phasing b. Areas o f disturbance based on the demolition phasing c. Areas of cut and fill d. Proposed basins e. Limits of construction based on the demolition phasing f. Proposed BMPs silt fence etc. g. Site access h. Stabilized staging area i. Proposed stock piles j. Portlets k. Chemical storage 3. Interim sheet should reflect the infrastructure specific to utility installation and needs to show the following at a minimum and based on the demolition phasing: a. Proposed stormwater utility b. Disturbed areas, including utility connections c. LOC, including utility connections d. CWA e. SSA f. Portalets g. Chemical storage 4. Final sheet should reflect paved conditions with vertical construction still in progress; therefore the building foot prints would still be exposed and erosion and sediment controls are still required accordingly. Show all applicable BMPs i.e. CWA, SSA, LOC, etc. 5. All areas that will be conveying concentrated flows per design (curb and gutters, swales ete.) and from unforeseen interim site conditions require adequate erosion controls to prevent sediment transport and surface erosion. 6. For the interim phase plan sheet you show limits of construction outside the silt fence along the perimeter, what is being used for perimeter sediments controls? If grade differential this needs to be stated with explanation with elevation differences and slopes. Wheat sediment controls are going to be used for when work along perimeters is being done ? 7. What BMPs are being proposed for the work along the east side of Upham St. ? 8. No need to include the Landscape Plan sheet, this can be referenced in the final stabilization section, refer to narrative comment # 14. Best Regards, William C. LaRow, P.G., C.H.M.M. Stormwater Quality Program Manager City of Wheat Ridge PW Eng Dept 7500 West 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 ec: City of Wheat Ridge Stormwater electronic file Citv Of 9-€»« 43 Wheat Rilge - PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner FROM:Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE:April 27,2017 SUBJECT:MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 I have completed my fourth review for the request to allow for a mixed use redevelopment at the property located at 7391 & 7323 W. 38th Avenue, and 3845 Upham Street received on April 26,2017, and I have the following comments that will need to be corrected prior to Mylar®: PLANNING & ZONING Final Plat Sheets 1 (Cover Sheet): 1. There are two distance typos in the Legal Description that do not correspond to the graphical portion. 2. The Surveyor's seal and signature will be required when ready for Mylar®. Sheets 2: 1. All previous comments have been adequately addressed. Sheets 3: 1. All previous comments have been adequately addressed. Sheet 4 Lot and Easement Detail: 1. The ROW area depicted on this Sheet currently excludes the 6'Exception Parcel' that was ROW previously dedicated under Reception 90086571. This is fine, but then the Exception Parcel must be shown (in a shaded linetype, since this will be an island of ROW in the middle of dedicated ROW). Or, you can leave the Exception Parcel off and just adjust the square foot area o f the ROW (PW would prefer this option as it' s more clear). West End 38 - Plat Only_Review-4.ltr.docx 6 A City of37 WheatRidge- PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, AICP, Senior Planner FROM:Mark Westberg, PE, CFM, Project Supervisor DATE:March 22, 2017 SUBJECT:West End 38 Traffic Impact Study - February 2017 - 2nd Review I have completed my review of the revised Traffic Impact Study dated February 2017 for the proposed West End development at the northwest corner o f 38th Avenue and Upham Street. I have the following comments regarding this submittal: 1. Page 3, Figure 2, Site Plan a. This figure shows the access across from Upham Street being a one-way in only. The remaining figures and calculations show this access functioning as a 34 movement. Please clarify if left outs will be restricted in some way. The intent is for full movement access at the Upham Street garage entrance. b. The one-way exit from the bank should be constructed so that it discourages left outs. Exit drive curb has been updated to discourage left turns. A "Right Only" sign has also been added to the drive exit on the east side of the bank to discourage left turns at this location as well. 6 J City of3 W heat Ridge -- PUBLIC WORKS *elfus ) Memorandum »f TO:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner FROM:Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE:June 6,2017 SUBJECT:MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 I have completed my fourth review for the request to allow for a mixed use redevelopment at the property located at 7391 & 7323 W. 38th Avenue, and 3845 Upham Street received on February 27, 2017, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING Final Plat Please note the following comments previously returned on April 27.207 will need to be corrected prior to Mylar®: Sheet 1 (Cover Sheet): 1. There are two distance typos in the Legal Description that do not correspond to the graphical portion. 2. The Surveyor's seal and signature will be required when ready for Mylar®. Sheet 2 (Ouarter Section Breakdown): 1. All previous comments have been adequately addressed. Sheet 3 (Boundary Establishment): 1. All previous comments have been adequately addressed. Sheet 4 Lot and Easement Detail: 1. The ROW area depicted on this Sheet currently excludes the "Exception Parcel" that was ROW previously dedicated under Reception 90086571. This is fine, but then the Exception Parcel must be shown (in a shaded linetype, since this will be an island of ROW in the middle of dedicated ROW). Or, you can leave the Exception Parcel off and just adjust the square foot area of the ROW (PW would prefer this option as it's more clear). West End 38 Plat-CDs-SWMP Review-4.docx L J Public Works Engineering June 6,2017 Page 2 CIVIL ENGINEERING Final Drainage Report/ Plan 1. All previous comments have been adequately addressed; the Final Drainage Report is approvable. 2. Please provide a hardcopy containing a P.E. seal and signature and a PDF file of the sealed/signed document for approval. Civil Construction Plans (Redlined Sheets ONLY - all other sheets are approvable) Sheet C2.1: 1. These comments are from Kelly Rosson, ADAC (the City's ADA Coordinator): a. The van accessible parking on the north side of the proposed new Vectra Bank building needs to be mirrored and moved to the west side rather than being on the east as it is currently designed. The current design does not leave room for wheelchair access to the ramp. (Refer to redlined Sheet C2.1). b. This got missed on the previous review, but the van accessible area along Upham Street requires an 8' landing (it's currently shown as only 5.0'). And, the brick pavers should be removed in a 4' x 4' area and replaced with standard concrete at the top of the ADA ramp in this location Sheet C7.5: 1. Please double-check the cross-slope grade on Section 11+75. At Station 11+50 it's at 1.4% and then at 12+00 it is at 3.7% (sure seems like it ought to be more around 2.5%). 2. Public Works suggests relocating this sheet right after the W. 38th Avenue Plan & Profile (Sheet C6.1) since they are all related. Stormwater Management Plan 1. The Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) will be reviewed by Bill LaRow, Stormwater Coordinator 303.235.2871. Any comments from Bill will be returned under separate cover. OTHER REOUIREMENTS: 1. Subdivision Improvement Agreement: Prior to the issuance of any Building or Right-of-Way Construction Permits or the commencement of any construction activities, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) shall be executed by the project owner/developer. The project owner/developer will need to contact the Dept. of Community Development at 303.235.2846 to obtain a copy of the SIA. Please note that an approved engineer's West End 38 Plat-CDs-SWMP Review-4.docx Public Works Engineering June 6,2017 Page 3 itemized cost estimate for the public improvements will be included in the SIA (refer to Other Requirement #6 below). SIAs are recorded at the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office along with the Final Plat. 2. Engineer's Itemized Cost Estimate: Prior to recording of the Final Plat an Engineer's Itemized Cost Estimate (EICE) for the public improvements shall be submitted for review and approval. The amount of the approved EICE will be referenced in the SIA and used for the Performance Guarantee (see #3 below). 3. Public Improvements Cost Estimate & Guarantee: Prior to the issuance of any Building or Right-of-Way Construction Permits, or commencement of any construction activities, an itemized engineer's cost estimate shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon acceptance of this estimate, an Irrevocable Letter of Credit (ILOC) in the amount of reflecting the total amount of the approved cost estimate plus 25% (125% of the total estimate) shall be submitted by the owner/developer for review and approval at the time of SIA submittal. The ILOC shall remain in force for the entire duration of the project, and the City reserves the right to request the ILOC be renewed if deemed necessary. A photocopy of both the itemized cost estimate and ILOC will be attached to the SIA and recorded at the county. 4. Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s)/Licensing: a. ROW Permits. Prior to any construction within the public right-of-way (ROW), the necessary Right-of-Way Construction Permit(s) and respective licensing will need to be submitted for processing by the City. Right-of-Way Construction Permits are issued by the City only after approval of all required technical documents, including but not limited to, the Final Drainage Report & Plan, Final Plat, Final Development Plan, Traffic Impact Study, Storm Sewer Plans, Street Construction Plans, Grading & Erosion Control Plan, Traffic Control Plan, and easement or ROW dedications b. Licensing. All work within the public Right-of-Way shall only be performed by a municipally-licensed contractor. 5. Pre-Construction Meeting: Prior to commencement of any construction activities the contractor shall schedule a pre-construction meeting with the city of Wheat Ridge public works at 303.235.2861. The contractor shall be responsible for contacting all applicable utility districts for this meeting. 6. Drainage Certification/ As-Built Plans/ SMA and O&M Plan: Please note the following items required prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the subdivision: a. Drainage Certification: Upon completion of the drainage improvements, the Engineer-of-Record shall provide to the City o f Wheat Ridge a written, signed and sealed Drainage Certification Letter (DCL) stating that the West End 38 Plat-CDs-SWMP Review-4.docx Public Works Engineering June 6, 2017 Page 4 overall site grading was completed per the approved Grading and Drainage Plans, all drainage facilities were constructed per the approved construction plans and shall function as defined in the approved Final Drainage Report/Plan, and that the site has been accurately surveyed to confirm that the grading and construction of all drainage facilities was completed in accordance with these documents. The DCL shall be submitted to the City for review and approval, and shall be accompanied with As-Built Plans on the Current City Datum for all constructed drainage facilities prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. b. As-Built Plans: The following items shall be included in the As-Built Plan prior to City acceptance: i. Storm Sewer (this info referenced in DCL) 1. Detention/WQ pond volume (sufficient spot elevations for engineer to calculate the volume). 2. Detention/WQ pond Outlet Structure elevations. 3. Manholes, rim and invert elevations. 4. Drop Inlets, grate and invert elevations. ii. Lighting (within Public ROW only) 1. Streetlight locations. 2. Pedestrian light locations. 3. Pull Box locations. 4. Electric meter location(s). Three (3) copies of the "As-Built" Plans are to be submitted as follows: i. One (1) hardcopy is to be signed & sealed on 24" X 36" bond paper, and ii. Two (2) electronic files are to be delivered on DVD/CD-ROM as follows: 1. One (1) file in AutoCAD 2013 DWG or older format, AND 2. One (1) file in PDF format (ofthe signed & sealed sheets). 7. Information pertaining to the Public Works development requirements, Site Drainage Requirements, the City's Street Construction Standards & Details in AutoCAD® DWG format, ROW maps, and City-based coordinate and land surveying information (i.e., Current City Datum), is all available on the Public Works, Development Review page of the City of Wheat Ridge website at: www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Please include one PDF and one AutoCAD (2015 or older) DWG file of the Final Plat and one PDF of all the revised Civil Documents with the next submittal. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303.235.2864. West End 38_Plat-CDs-SWMP Review-4.docx Public Works Engineering June 6,2017 Page 5 Sincerely, 0-OAL--- David F. Brossman, P.L.S. City Surveyor / Development Review Engineer CC:Steve Nguyen, Engineering Manager Mark Van Nattan, Engineering Technician File West End 38 Plat-CDs-SWMP Review-4.docx City of74W heatI2*}ge -- PUBLIC WORKS Memorandum TO:Lauren Mikulak, Senior Planner FROM:Dave Brossman, Development Review Engineer DATE:June 6,2017 SUBJECT:MS-16-08, WCP-16-04, WSP-16-07, and CUP-16-02 / West End 38 I have completed my fourth review for the request to allow for a mixed use redevelopment at the property located at 7391 & 7323 W. 38th Avenue, and 3845 Upham Street received on February 27,2017, and I have the following comments: PLANNING & ZONING 1. The SDP and plat have been previously approved by PW. CIVIL ENGINEERING Final Drainage Report/ Plan 1. All previous comments have been adequately addressed; the Final Drainage Report is approvable. 2. Please provide a hardcopy containing a P.E. seal and signature and a PDF file of the sealed/signed document for approval. Response: Final Drainage Report/Plan will be included with next submittal. Civil Construction Plans (Redlined Sheets ONLY - all other sheets are approvable) Sheet C2.1: 1. These comments are from Kelly Rosson, ADAC (the City's ADA Coordinator): a. The van accessible parking on the north side ofthe proposed new Vectra Bank building needs to be mirrored and moved to the west side rather than being on the east as it is currently designed. The current design does not leave room for wheelchair access to the ramp. (Refer to redlined Sheet C2.1). West End 38 Plat-(Ds-SWMP Review-4.docx 6 & Public Works Engineering June 6, 2017 Page 2 Response: Van accessible parking on the north side of the proposed new Feetra Bank has been moved to the west side so that the accessible ramp is adjacent to the loading area. See sheets £2.1 for updated layout. b. This got missed on the previous review, but the van accessible area along Upham Street requires an 8' landing (it's currently shown as only 5.0'). And, the brick pavers should be removed in a 4' x 4' area and replaced with standard concrete at the top o f the ADA ramp in this location Response: Acknowledged. All pavers have been removed from the landings at the top of ADA ramps. See (2.1 for updated paver layout. Sheet C7.5: 1. Please double-check the cross-slope grade on Section 11+75. At Station 11+50 it's at 1.4% and then at 12+00 it is at 3.7% (sure seems like it ought to be more around 2.5%). Response: Acknowledged. Label has been updated to reflect true cross-slope (2.9%). See sheet C6.2 for update 2. Public Works suggests relocating this sheet right after the W. 38th Avenue Plan & Profile (Sheet C6.1) since they are all related. Response: Acknowledged. Sheets have been rearranged so that the Cross Section sheets for W. 3* and Upham come directly after their respective Plan & Profile sheets. See sheets C6.1 - C6.4 for updates. Stormwater Management Plan 1. The Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) will be reviewed by Bill LaRow, Stormwater Coordinator 303.235.2871. Any comments from Bill will be returned under separate cover. OTHER REOUIREMENTS: 1. Subdivision Improvement Agreement: Prior to the issuance of any Building or Right-o f-Way Construction Permits or the commencement of any construction activities, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) shall be executed by the project owner/developer. The project owner/developer will need to contact the Dept. of Community Development at 303.235.2846 to obtain a copy of the SIA. Please note that an approved engineer's itemized cost estimate for the public improvements will be included in the SIA (refer to Other Requirement #6 below). SIAs are recorded at the Jefferson County Clerk & Recorder's Office along with the Final Plat. West End 38 Plat-CDs-SWMP Review-4.docx .. City of Wheat Mge -- PUBLIC WORKS STORMWATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM City ofWheat Ridge Municipal Building 303.235.2857 7500 W. 29th Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2861 F: To: Dennis Sobieski, Project Engineer, Kimley-Horn From: William C. LaRow III, Stormwater Quality Program Manager Date: June 15,2017 Subject: Proposed retail stores at W. 38th Ave and Upham St. Wheat Ridge CO 80033. I have reviewed the second submittal o f the Stormwater Management Plan and engineering drawings dated May 12th 2017 and I have the following comments: General Comments: 1. Prior to approving this SWMP the City will need a copy of the CDPHE Construction Discharge permit. Response: Acknowledged. CDPHE Construction Discharge permit to be submitted by contractor. Narrative Comments 1. Under Proposed Project Description - There is no reference to vertical construction (bank) Response: Vertical construction ofall three proposed buildings added to the list of construction activities covered under the Stormwater Management Plan (see 'Propose Project Description' - Page 6) 2. Sequence of Construction - • Add a general statement of the overall sequence of construction i.e. Construction on Lot 1 will be first phase and will entail demolition, infrastructure and vertical construction when all work for lot 1 is completed then work on lot 2 will then proceed and involve demolition of existing bank, infrastructure, and vertical construction, reference the SIA phasing exhibit. Response: General statement added to the beginning of 'Proposed Sequence for Major Activities' and reference is made to the SIA Phasing Exhibit (see page 7). • Revise the dates Response: Dates revised to June 22, 2017. Drawing Comments: 1. Need to show the cut and fill areas Response: Cut and fill areas for final grading are shown on sheet C 1 1.5 2. Need to show the limits o f disturbance Response: Limits of Disturbance are shown on each of the Erosion Control Plans (sheets C 11.1 - Cl 1.5) and are specific to the construction being done in that phase. www.ci.wheatridge.co.us K:\DEN Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\_Project Files\Submittals\City of Wheat Ridge\2017-06-22 CD Submittal #3\SWMP Comment Response Letter.docx 6 J 3. Need to have a retention pond design for the discharge to the field east of lot 1, this includes calculations showing that the pond dimensions will be adequate for the upstream drainage area (2 year event). Response: Retention pond has been added (see sheets Cl 1.2 -Cl 1.4) to contain 2-year event. See detail for pond on sheet C 11.2. Calculations have been added to the Narrative in Appendix E. Best Regards, William C. LaRow, P.G., C.H.M.M. Stormwater Quality Program Manager City of Wheat Ridge PW Eng Dept 7500 West 29th Ave Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 cc: City ofWheat Ridge Stonnwater electronic file City OfIV Wheat INge West End 38 Pre-construction Meeting Agenda July 14, 2017 A. Introductions B. Document status - City a. Subdivision plat b. Subdivision improvement agreement c. Concept plan d. Site plan e. SWMP f. Drainage Plan g. Civil Construction Plans h. Vectra Building Permit C. Schedule/Phasing - West End 38 Team D. Next steps a. Letter of credit b. ROW permit requirements - license, bond, materials testing... c. Building permit requirements - license, construction trailer, staging... E. Other a. Prior to Vectra CO - drainage, as-built, 0&M b. Prior to Lot 1 building permit - Phase Il LOC c. Sanitation update d. Coordination with City overlays (Upham and 38th) L A West End 38 - Pre-closing checklist Outstanding Items ¤ Developer - Remove Vectra signature block from plat ¤ Developer - Revise utility easement to "vacated by separate document" ¤ Developer - Send final plat (pdf and dwg) to City O Developer - Send revised SIA exhibits (cost estimate and phasing exhibit) ¤ Developer - Confirm Vectra ownership entity on concept plan and site plan matches ownership name on deed for Lot 1 (currently shown as ZB, N.A. dba Vectra Bank Colorado) O Developer - Provide closing instructions for review (since closing will include recordation of City documents) - City will need to receive original copies back of SIA, Plat and Concept Plan - order of recordation should generally be as follows: 1. Deed (and any associated docs) conveying Vectra parcel to Olive Street 2. Plat 3. SIA 4. Deed (and any associated docs) conveying Lot 1 from Olive Street to Vectra 5. Concept Plan ¤ City - Review cost estimates - to be approved by Dave Brossman ¤ City - Review phasing exhibit (graphic) - to be approved by Dave Brossman ¤ City - Print approval sheets for concept plan, site plan and conditional use permit (8.5 x 11, not recorded) ¤ Developer - Print plat on mylar (check margins: 2" on left, 1" on top, and >2" on right/bottom) ¤ Developer - Print concept plan on mylar (check margins) O Developer - Print site plan on bond paper ¤ Developer- Print SIA (one-sided on 8.5 x 11) O Developer - Get signatures from 01ive Street and Vectra (see next page) O Developer - Provide all signed documents to the City O Developer - Retrieve signed documents for closing (plat, SIA, concept plan) Required Signatures, by person - use thin-tip black Sharpie (no ballpoint) Olive Street Development Co - SIGN BEFORE SUBMITTING TO CITY ¤ Subdivision mylar - Owner's certificate NOTARIZED ¤ Concept plan mylar - Owner's certificate NOTARIZED O Subdivision Improvement Agreement - Signature sheet on page 12 NOTARIZED O Site Plan - Owner's certificate NOTARIZED Vectra - SIGN BEFORE SUBMITTING TO CITY ¤ Concept plan mylar - Owner's certificate NOTARIZED O Site Plan - Owner's certificate NOTARIZED Ken Johnstone ¤ Subdivision mylar - City certification ¤ Concept plan mylar - City certification 0 Concept plan approval sheet 0 Site plan approval sheet O Conditional use permit approval sheet Scott Brink O Subdivision mylar - City certification Scott Ohm ¤ Subdivision mylar- Planning Commission certification Jerry Dahl ¤ Subdivision Improvement Agreement - City signature sheet on page 11 Mayor Jay ¤ Subdivision mylar - City certification ¤ Concept plan mylar - City certification ¤ Subdivision Improvement Agreement - City signature sheet on page 11 Janelle Shaver- SIGNS LAST O Subdivision mylar - City certification O Concept plan mylar- City certification ¤ Subdivision Improvement Agreement - City signature sheet on page 11 *** Route this checklist with documents Return to Community Development *** . City ofipr Wheat Ridge- COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 2gth Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 July 31,2017 Tyler Downs Wazee Partners, LLC 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Dear Mr. Downs, Please accept this letter as zoning verification for the property located at 7333 W. 38th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 (also known as Lot 1, West End Filing No. 1). The subject property is zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C). This zone district allows for mixed use development, including multifamily and retail uses. The zoning does not regulate the ratio of residential to retail uses, nor are there limitations on the number of residential units per acre. The proposed development for Lot 1 is permitted in the MU-C zone district, including a four-story building, 165 apartments, and nearly 9,000 square feet of retail space. Please feel free to be in touch with any additional questions. Sincerely, r-3 T. Lauren E. Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner www.ci.wheatridge.co.us & 1 *-. C-ity ofPU Wheat 12*ge --·-0000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 2gth Ave.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 January 27,2017 Re: Amendment and Termination in Part of 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement To Whom It May Concern: Please allow this letter to serve as zoning verification relative to the proposed amendment and termination of an access easement located within Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision and within the unplatted Vectra Bank parcel at 7391 W. 38 Avenue. I have reviewed the document titled "Amendment and Termination in Part of 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement" as well as the associated exhibits. Both properties impacted by the subject easement are currently zoned Mixed Use-Commercial (MU-C). Upon review of the zoning and of the existing and proposed conditions, I have concluded that the proposed modification and termination of the easement will not impact the zoning compliance of Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision. If you have any further questions, I can be reached at 303-235-2845. Sincerely, t 0 9-1-1 ./ Lauren Mikulak, AICP Senior Planner www.ci.wheatridge.co.us LA November 18,2016 ACF Property Management, Inc. 1512 Lai'imer St, Suite 1012 Denver, CO 80202 Attention: Mellisa McBride Regional Property Manager Re:Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel - Wheat Ridge, CO - Reconfiguration of 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement Located Upon the Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel Dear Ms. MeBride: We have been advised that ACF Property Management, Inc., is the proper contact for Wheat Ridge 08 A, LLC, the Owner of Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place, Subdivision, First Filing. The Vectra Bank Colorado owner of tile existing banking facility adjacent to the Market Place Subdivision iii Wheat Ridge, was recently consolidated into, and is now known as, "ZB National Association, d/b/a Vectra Bank Colorado." At this time the Vectra Bank Colorado would like the owner of Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place, to consent to the Vectra Bank Colorado termination ofthe 15- foot wide nortll/south ingress and egress easement located upon the Vectra Bank Colorado site. The 1 5-foot access runs froin the Market Place Lot 6, southward around the existing bank facility, to a connection with 38111 Avenue. This consent arises because theingress/egress easement covered a parcel of land that previously was conveyed to a prior Market Place owner and included within Lot 6. It, 1986 the Vectra Bank Colorado's predecessor owner of the Vectra Bank Colorado parcel (Wadsworth Building Corporation), recorded Hit ingress and egress easement burdening the then configured bank parcel containing approximately 72,353 sq, ft. Enclosed at Exhibit A is a copy of the recorded 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement (Jeffeison County Reception No. 86065671). The ingress/egress easement is depicted on the recorded easement with a diagonal line matrix, Subsequently, in 1995, the northernmost 15,203 square feet of the Vectra Bank Colorado parcel, adjacent to the shopping center, was conveyed to the tlien owner oftlie shopping center. Following this parcel division, the 15-lbot of the northernmost stub end of the 1986 PROPERTY & FACILITIFS MANAGFMENT 1650 S, COLORADO BOULEVARD DENVER COLORADO 80222 PI-IONE /20947 7212 FAX 720947 7560 www.vect,dbarik.coin -1,/COLORADO LENDEA MEMBER FDIC ACFProperty Management, Inc November 18,2016 Page 2 Ingress/Egress Easement became a burden upon the Market Place Land, where the 15,203 square foot parcel footprint was located. Because of this same division and conveyance, this 15,203 square foot parcel is now also viewed as a beneficiary ofthe 15-foot access. This is why we are asking for your consent to the easement reconfiguration. At this time, the Vectra Bank Colorado is planning to relocate the existing banking facility to a new, smaller, banking facility to be constructed on the South end o f the Vectra Bank Colorado parcel, with frontage along 38'11 Avenue. The north/south alignment of the 1 5-foot wide portion of the easement connecting fi-om Lot 6 and running southward to the 24-foot east/west alignment, has no function. Please note, this north end 1 5-foot easement alignment was never used by either the Market Place or the Vectra Bank Colorado, as there has always been a 3 to 4 foot sloped grade separation at the easement entry to the Vectra Bank Colorado property that has been landscaped with trees and shrubs fur some 30 years. More to the point, removal of this 15- foot north/south easement is necessary iii order to permit relocation of the bank facility. Attached at Exhibit B is an instrument pursuant to which Vectra Bank Colorado will amend the ingress/egress easement of 1986 to abandon and release the 1 5-foot north/south easement alignment. Please note the 24-tool east/west easement alignment remains in place. At this time, Vectra Bank Colorado requests Wheat Ridge 08 A, LLC consent to this amendment. Please also note, we have added a consent provision for your mortgage lender iii the event the Market Place has a mortgage lien encumbrance. Your assistance is genuinely appreciated. Please contact me or the Bank's corporate counsel, Brent Waite (801.844.7678) to address any questions. Very truly yours, ZB National Association, d/b/a Vectra Bank Colorado Eileen Breslin Facilities Department Manager ec: James Yankovich, Vectra Bank Colorado, Facilities Department PROPERTY & FACH ITIES MANAGEMENT 1650 S. COLORADO BOULEVARD DENVER COLORADO 80222 PHONE 720 947 7212 FAX 720 947 7560 rECTRARANKwww.vectrabank.com LENDER MEMBER FDIC EXHIBIT C L 3830 WADSWORTH BOULEVARD WHEATRIDGE 08 A AND WHEATRIDGE 08 A LLC LOT 6 BLOCK 1 WHEAT RIDGE MARKETPLACE, FIRST FIUNG REC. NO. F015620730' WATER. -1 LOT 1, E.S. ALLEN SUBDIVISION REC. NO. 2010000090 INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PER REC. NO. F0134584 -7 ,5 I 90Z 15' INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PER REC. NO. 86065671 0 psce UnUTY - EASEMENT REC.j NO. 114210 SOO°12'07"E 5.59' N89638'24"13 75 759 1 N89°38'48"E131.84'//7 L - logooi __ __ 15' INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PER REC. NO. 86065671 7391 WEST 38TH AVENUE NADSWORTH BUIIDING CORPORATION REC. NO. F0050611 57,203 SQ. FT. OR 1.313 ACRES 24' INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PER REC. NO. 86065671 f 99 089°38'24"W -nx y 0 0 15' INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT PER REC. NO. 86065671 7403 WEST 38TH AVENUE 94 7403 WEST 38TH AVENUE LLC 210 REC. NO. F0050611 al O0 - 02 1 131.9' 1- Ilj WK-LC-OW.I. SURVEYING INC 1 Sayw38'241'W WEST 38TH AVENUE 99.72'PUBLIC ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY VARIES SAJOBS\2016\160425\DWG\160425-Exhibit-\/1.dwg AMENDMENT AND TERMINATION IN PART OF 1986 INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT Recitais Whereas, ZB National Association, a National Banking Association, d/b/a Vectra Bank Colorado, whose address is Facilities Department, 1650 S. Colorado Boulevard, Suite 100, Denver, Colorado 80222 (hereinafter "Vectra Bank Colorado"), is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Wheat Ridge, Jefferson County, Colorado, more particularly described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein, said parcel of land being hereinatter referred to as the "Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel." Whereas, Wadsworth Building Corporation, a predecessor owner of the Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel, plus an additional 15,203 square foot parcel adjacent to the Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel, recorded an ingress/egress easement on June 17,1986 with the Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder (Reception No. 86065671), said easement being hereinafter referred to as the "1986 inguess/Egress Easement." The parcel containing the l 5,203 square feet is now located wholly within Lot 6. Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision, First Filing, Jefferson County, Colorado. Whereas. the 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement depicted, with a diagonal line matrix, a certain 15-foot north/south alignment of the easement and a 24-foot east/west aligninent of the easenient, all as set forth and described on Exhibit B, which is a copy of the recorded 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement, which Exhibit B is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Whereas, Vectra Bank Colorado now desires to amend the 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement in part to terminate and release the 1 5-foot north/south alignment of the access, easement, which deleted access is depicted on Exhibit C, which Exhibit is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, undersigned Vectra Bank Colorado, as owner of the Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel, does now hereby amend the 1986 Ingress/Egress r.asement to terminate, abandon and release the 1 5-foot north/south easement alignment depicted on Exhibit C, and does hereby further covenant and confirm, \vith respect to Exhibit C, the following: (a) The termination, abandonment und release of any beneficial interest of Vecti-a Bank Colorado in the 15-foot north/south easement alignment, to the extent the easement burdened any part of Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision, First Filing; (b) The termination, abandonment and release of the 15-foot north/south easement alignment as a burden upon the Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel, from the north property line o f the Vectra Bank Colorado Parcel all the way to the existing access point on 38th Avenue, which terminated access easement alignment is depicted on Exhibit C; and (c) The existing 24-foot east/west easement aligmnent established iii the 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement remains unmodified and unamended. Except as so partially amended herein, the 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement shall remain in full force and effect. ZB National Association, d/Wa Vectra Bank Colorado ABy: 45' l.CU'FL->01 4 2-84aw,v r- 4 1Name: CE-1 / €_-€-+1 J ibr ea /4 Fl STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SSCITY OF CNIVEA- ) Title: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, a notary public, this 18 day ofN 6, on/>C,1/ ,201£ by (6 GED,1 8#651 4 ,as v-A.,11.1 116 M.64- of 1/¢94+ SAW, 4400+06 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: No-Cjk-- (it'- SEAL: MICHAEL JOSEPH CAMPBELL Notary Public State of Colorado Notary It): 20064004362 My Commission Expires Feb. 1,2018 2 Consent ofWheat Ridge 08 A, LLC The undersigned Wheat Ridge 08 A LLC, a limited liability company, as Owner of Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision, First Filing, Jefferson County, Colorado, and as a beneficiary of the 1986 Ingress/Egress Easement, does hereby consent to the foregoing Amendment and Termination in Part of Ingress/Egress Easement. Wheat Ridge 08 A LLC, a limited liability company By: Name: Title: Date: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS CITY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, a notary public, this day of , 20_, by ,as of WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: Notary Public SEAL: 3 Mortgage Lender Consent: The undersigned mortgage lender holding an encumbrance upon Lot 6, Block 1, Wheat Ridge Market Place Subdivision, First Filing, Jefferson County, Colorado, does hereby consent to the foregoing Reconfiguration of Ingress/Egress Easement. By: Name: Title: Date: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS CITY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, a notary public, this day of , 20-,by ,as of WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: Notary Public SEAL: 4 Exhibit A Legal Description Parcel One: PARCEL A: A part of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6tlt Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 30.00 feet Northerly and 526.40 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Southeast one-quarter; Thence Northerly, parallel with the West line of said Southeast one-quarter a distance of 421.15 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds and along a line parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter a distance of 131.65 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds a distance of 421.15 feet to a point 30.00 feet Northerly of the said South line of the Southeast one-quarter; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 46 minutes 23 seconds and along a line of 30.00 feet Northerly of and parallel to the said South line of the Southeast one-quarter a distance of 131.82 feet to the Point of Beginning. SAVE AND EXCEPT that portion of the above-described land conveyed to the American Oil Company on the 21.day ofMarch, 1972, to wit: A part of the Southeast 1 /4 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6tll Principal Meridian, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 30.00 feet Northerly and 526.40 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Southeast 1 /4; Thence Northerly, parallel with the West line of said Southeast M, a distance of 100.0 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds and along a line parallel with the South line of said Southeast 1 /4, a distance of 131.79 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 13 ninutes 37 seconds, a distance of 100.00 feet to a point 30.00 feet Northerly ofthe South line ofthe Southeast 1/4; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 46 minutes 23 seconds and along a line of 30.00 feet Northerly of and parallel to the South line of the Southeast 1/4, a distance of 131.82 feet to the parcel of land, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. SAVE AND EXCEPT that portion of the above-described land described as Parcel B as follows: PARCEL B: A parcel of land located in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: - 5 Beginning at a point 30.00 feet Northerly and 45.00 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Southeast one-quarter, which point is the Southwest corner of Block 1, Park and Shop Subdivision First Amendment; thence East along the South line of said Block 1, 30.00 feet North of and parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 481.40 feet to the most Southeast corner of said Block 1; thence Northerly along the East line of said Block 1, parallel with the West line of said Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 306.15 feet to the true Point of Beginning; thence continuing Northerly, along said Easterly line and parallel with said West line, a distance of 115.00 feet to an Easterly corner of said Block 1; thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds and along an Easterly line of said Block 1 and parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 131.65 feet to an Easterly corner of said Block 1; thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 46 minutes 23 seconds and parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 131.70 feet, more or less, to the true Point of Beginning. Parcel Two: The West 100 feet ofthe SWIM SE1/4 SWIM SE1/4 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P M., except the South 30.00 feet thereof for North 385 Avenue, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado 6 PA<, 117 pp m Rer. * Ph/56*7 48-95 /8, S R M 6UA'{W' 1461 P•64.6 441 0- W[EDGE [MIA[RK[EF[PLA©[8 8[[2[30¥080©[M, PO[EET 1®[LD[*leHEA[r IR 46-= 02272 1...01 U 'laid -rf*y eoctrel ba'ed upon CLey of Wh.at 'idg' ri.t-oe- -y •Imp R,v,r,n< Mon=*ati filad for record A R,cption Mo. S81104IS and Br-kagwn of Section 23. 1'38, R6-. City of bat Ridg/W-t lina of Seuth-t Ca-*art,r 02 -id S*ction bear *0010·12•W *, p- fi,ld control r,cord. 2> Coordinate, 02 11... It/**t -n-... ..."'., 962 twii D.'..'.Ii 804104865 .709 15312+7661 37014.340 S:60]2644 4709 10027+0022 .806,49" U All parking,pace. - all dzl-way, ar hreby d*ignted by ZONE R-3 blanket ea,ement for .1,0 by all ew=*rs and tecanti. Ind th,ir *-e,/ Ind,h11 b* eenlid,rd - a cro,/·p-king *-nt 4) 11.0// -/al indic.. /. •......./.- ......• ,hall ./0 allow 20: 9•11*cal public 'cel- acd adjace:/ property ice,- =hreugh t., Subdivilen withir -14 4*,ignat,d -0-,t,i at -tually agr-4 upon acc*„ point -4 22 -1 - 37852· I30' 1./.ES-EC./S I ..iT¥ EAS' 4,0.!P --------------1-- Set K Bar /Cap 09010 (-08, Po .0I PS¢ EASaE»T --n VII 6 -n' -Eas-nt limit a: al21,#.Mf i 4ZZF*t -Zaement vacated by 1 6 € • C-,te'lin.4 "00/1'379£ 21.-30· • Aor.. --"--GM;€-18£2-1 : .2- -# -WSPE-/5,6; Rae . -Recording Rceptton -- M 73 6 LOT 4Util, .Ut.'ty (1.776 ac.*) ;%% : .m WHEAT RID6: 16! -·.... B E Z 4,1 6 .33."n-/ thil plat #ft *fr , 297.65 Eaae-ent A Resubdivision of PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDMENT and a Subdivision of a part of the Southeast One-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M. City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado SE Cor .1/4 J S,c. 235·O* SHEET 1 OF 2 Fd. 3-/4' Cal.ZONE R-C Monument #13212 NOT SUBDIVIDED SOO·1'371 721.65 606.65' ---11.-' --- SOON1'37'E . 4@&07'WA.115" ' /,41 r--O,- Sol·81'•rv / ..67. 813 Ls. C AN-1 ' 1 SOO'10'12NW»* ///1 .-38 e7Wn--/ 4 /4 R Soo·11·37·1 (-1'.0,3.,„) 'C.. *1..'ll=la'*7-0....Ll=,i1'23·.. - 1\ vr, _ir ..Emzur. 233 .1 LOT 5 c.w-e) BLOCK *.g __--*t ' :23/-. *49--€,0 I C- MOO0'10%&24..' (1.1:E 4 MWRK«LACZf(f:p*SUBD 9N 0.4LOT 7 17.·m, 1,4 ..\:4 TEMPE 9 3\FIRST ZONE C 900'21'371 24 83'141.90' r-L------1v 307,21 5 LOT 6 IVIS1 L =TIaN CERTIFICATE ... ... == pw. I colorado .=Iral ........p, b./.thi obmer of the r-1 property c! 11.537 ac:,0 dcrib,d ai Zell-Ii Lots 1, 2. 3 4. 5 6, 7 and 8, Block 1. PAZZ Al® BEDP SUBDIVISIC!1. ./-lar u.... and a pr. of tb• South•••t Ose quart*r of 5-tion 23. /0-7-hip 3 South. Ung, 69 ¥*st of tb, 6th Principal -ridin.City le Wheat Ridg/, county of ./.-loc. Sta-of Colo/do, £1:agmor, parti)larly dcribed •• fill- N-,ocill I. ch' ./.'-It ./.ner o. thi South.... Cal-qut'r of •*id Section 23, th®nce NSS•00'30•I. I di,tanc, of 54.- 2•eE to the ,cuth-*t corn*: of Block 1. iald PAR* 11,0 anD' SUI}IVISION. .,sr Al,mD{m,r, ..ch point 1, thi * Plimt= 0, Bgimnii ..n-NOC'1012™. par/111 •fihh and 45.00 feet ea# of the -- lin, of 2 i d.can¢* e. 1027.80 E-t te th, Dorth-,t eornar of paid Block li-id louthea,t On/-quarter -d along thi w••t 112/ of -id Block 1 th*D- }709'38'23: along th, north lin' 02 *d Block 1 andpar.11*1 ith thi iouth line 0£ said Southalt 00,·qu•:t•E. Idi,tan,2/ 02 612.80 fe*t te t- nerth®8•t corn.r ef iald Block L 1 •10=g tb - lic• of ,aid Block 1, I di,tanclof 606-65 fet to mn eat•ril corner of ..id Block 1· Ehmel continuing 9011· 37•2 de,rting said aucrly cor-,-r. a ditanceof 115.00 Ea*ti th,nc' S38•23•/ parall/1 wlth thi lcuth lin' of •aid Southea,t ole-quarter. I di,tan- of 131.65 fl. to I pcint on Z h' -K lin' of laid Block 1: thence SOO•10'12: parallel with the w.,t line of aaid Scutheut ke-art- and along thi -,t lin 0,..id Block 1. a diltance of 297.65 feet te / point cm thi northM ./.®ption No. 9008.76. wbich pel.t i• •1/0 on thi north right-of·lineae the parce lof land convey,d to the City of Wheat Ria,* by way lin, /£ W£ .th AvIng- thenc, 009'38•2: along the northlilief ./id parcel of 1/d Ind /1=g ••id north light-of--y lilli a diltan./ of 251.. felt, th/ne' /00.21'37-/ along th' north liliof -id prcel IC 1nd =d 'long north :10ht-of·way 11-. Idi,t-c' 02 6.20 feet, t-ne' 88""•• along ..north lia• of lad p-:Ill of laad Ind /10/g ••id nolth right-0.-way lillia &diatem of 23.00 feet, thce SOO.21'37•8 along the aorth lia• 02 -id parc*1 of lnd and along -id north light-of-way lin/, I dilt/oc' 0, 6.20 f./.i th-,c' 989-30'23-W /1/,g thi lorth lin' ef Soul - SEI/4 -'d parcel of 1nd,nd along •aid noxth right-of-way 1-. a-...23, T.S. #59/d-,tancl of 17.50 f,et; thcl SOC•21•)7• along the north lina of„id parcel of lan' and along ••id corth righbof-way lin'. a DEDICATED TO TIE di,tanc, of 0.50 feet te I polt 00 the louth 11- of -1/ Block li CITY OF WHEAT ./.th.c. S.•38·"·-• par/11/1 with th' louth line 0, *•ld South/•It-). ./ PLAn 00,- and Long the =I. 1- 0, -id /1/ck 1. a diltal) 0210.SO fet, ,ore or le/. to the Trn Point of Beg#ing. •nd h.v. 1.id eut, .ubdivided and pl.... .ala 1.2 a, p., thi :- 0.000 0... ....PUCE SUBOIVISION ..... FILING. a 'tuklivillon of / part ofdrmwing bereon co=tained =d,u th, la- and styl of - RrDC. --S89·38'23W,dedlcat' to tha City of Wheat Ridg' and th, public. /tre-I. road/.the City of Wh,at Ridg/. Colorado. and by th,B, pre•ent' do 251.10'and av,nue and drlve- 0ho-. on the =wanying plat for th' public lie forvK. A Colorado ....ral Partnr,hip By: navIS f=RIS:S. G--ral Partner6 By #*M/hi.-er1 Prtner ,-3.:21'37E.ACKNOWL=....r- r @ S89·38'23W,stat 02 CaloraK ' /11-17.50'county _7 11 . E.SEINT 8.50'day of ,1995, by Ronald T. D.vil. .=/ral Partall -500·21'371 -a, *eknowleagd bfor, - on th" 146 6 1 0.*Fi.)-_S89'38'231. •Color/& 0-/ral Part'Ir•hip. of DAB. ...Nar.n*ral partner of IERAT .IDGE MARr,r PLACL 189.80 1 (0.058 -) I a 1.3,=in-ELe , 0 p.,=Xr./7-¥. 41.64wn·r-Wit-- - hd and oincial FORCRLY BLOCK 1 ID SHOP SUBDIVISION 6 1 ..ATED TO THE -20'.2 FIRE MENDMENT j .9 oF ... (1.019 oc.*) ,w »™S5-EGAESS 4 ,) R .. i m---+4-3 --57 RET53., .Cg-inien *pir-; ; - ciey.' #.t *i./.900*10'lrE. 387.82'MOO'10'12/. 303.46 1 S00·1012-1 18650' /' 4 0.12,1 132477 ... i Z .**uehk-k_NW Cor. SEI/4 M:.#64€' -zo· 66'746 ™E arf OF mEAT mOGE ('472 2110 NOO·11'410.,027.83' , I /3. 130'FF. 3-1/. C.O.W. ,1 U 91 .'of C,1°Tad .ir*' I •crurnent #13212 NOO'10'12-W, 1027.80 - 4709 n ./'10'12./, 2845 05 (Not to Sccle) R,Creation C=-.Ilion - 3749*WADSWORTH BOULEVARD (SH 121).1»naing, 9• Cer SE./4 J Clty . -'744»7--2 S-23, TA ROOW-/Dir*/tor i(S84104804) SVEY'.'8 ...FICI.GRAPC SCLE ...3-1/3- C I.W. FILl ..'Sti 7 5709 lctl Bat Rl I No,ary Public A 1/11 :tor a blic Work t Zidg®. ./. A. p•.1. /. kno-gly .... altre I. d.ells ely ..1/ LInd Survay 1,10-rn*nt. or lend bo-dory monum-t. 01 clee...,y. cor..1. 0 /13,8 2 M.demec,lor pur,tiont to Stat, Statuu 1 5-4-508 C.R. Eid?53'EREDGEE€ e,el, mny any octie,1 hos,d ur.0, I. defect in thi' D,·ey be commenc,d ,nor' thol t.l y,or, frorn th ... 0- c,Ftiftcation shown h*r,on. Budick. .I.gilt,rld Prefl//10//1 ./.ine'l Ind prof'-lenal *d Surveor regl,t--1 i. th, Stat* of Colorado doher,by c,rtify 'hat th' Iurvey of thi boundary 0£ ./IT RID/l .... UC! ......1./. FIRST FILING. wal ./de und.I my 'll.t r-ibility, 'up,i,lan, nd ch-king. and in aceor*nce #th•11 applicabl, Colerado St*tut-. ccrrent r,¥i,*d .ition, aI -ended. bj,et propr™ 1, net locatd within a 4,ignated .Ded hgard area.ne foregoing,tat-eat 15 ba*d to chan/ng lenditiona ..r ,aid dt,/ Por and -hal£ 02 NUnDICI INGIXI//ING CONSULTA»rl -PORI'll *EUg.h A. B.6-dick=. 21-LSCol,i'rado Rg. No. 9010 1 - 80'W,»4.1„nt AREA - 13.537 oc. 1 CLI*K AND ......•8 C......... Stace - Colordo 1 I ....by certify thal ./1/ pllt Ic.o¢k ..L... I. thil _"_ dayand 1, d41y r•corded in .lan 'llepaid t,G "59,2-dueAL.1"-'W ..... CO-ISSION C**n'ICA= · Thi, is to eertidy tht the Bthia plat ha, -= M¥end by thePlanaLag Comaillion O! thi City $ Wh-' 11./. Colorado.C¥1+-- 9-- %/' 0 CIRT'InCATZ this i, to certi fy hat ch* City of Wheat Uage, Colorade by metiond on th- 7/. day IE OZ---- i th' wital Ira and ...... th. dedication' A-4/Ed'/ luyer of 'I.I,L Couuoil di C.ty *fARMSf,wrritqlld V 8%./.17 ReL.* F D/S-627 CONSULTAN™IMCORPORATEDWHI®Alf INDDGE [MIA®KET'[PILACIE SU[8©0¥080©[NI, ED[RecT FOLD[Nle ...........92272 A Resubdivision of PARK AND SHOP SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDMENT and o Subdivision of a part of the Southeast One-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M. City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado '5309 SHEET 2 OF 2 ZONE R-3 s. n ™._ J 084104805) Z=57= 2 ZONE R-C NOT SUBDIVIDED SOO·11'37-E. 721.65' S00-1 07% .4/807 m Z -·--mt,N,2,146, 1211 NOO·213'n¥. 2,230'(1.717 00./) adsrs SOO·10'121 297.65 9.0 28aer #.'37'0¥. 23151 0 ir k 8.so'ir: m[]GE - 0.060 oca 12.Ll f---S89'38'23W. 4 (5847 ac.*)BLOCK 1 251.10'- 51kw 4 Ch .6.t='/m.2 &1<2 h 5 WHEAT RIDGE MARKETPLACE 4SUBDIVIS, W NA 5... ¢P) 01LOT 4a 11 (1.7760=*)FIRST FILING , -01» NOD·21'1.--d i & 9 ZONE C-1 8£L 10"1 0 - ' -m;21'37% 90021.3.1 N*. G590°--:ii,3Ur 13147 _989·38'23-W.17.50' -71'372 90011'371 245-83 .1,0011037. 141.99'-S89·38'23W. 189.80' £11 t(0.958 oc.*) LQ,_3 FORMERLY BLOCK 1 P AND SHOP SUBDIVISION :JI-;0.019 ...)Allm , AliBIDMENr Rop (0.125 -i) \(/ THIS PLAT) •,/ Cer..1/4 8 .07'.'.L 3.7.2 1,00112'll. 30148'1 800//12'L 11,8.550 1-10124 132.47 S.23.138.8- R 20' DEDICATED TO TIE CITY OF WHEAT RCE (0.4,2 -I) (B, l. Fkro 101UU NOC„'41/ 1¤27.Sy re=*.. 1 Monument #13212 NOO'10'12'W, 1027.80'0 9 37094709 /00·10'12-14 264&05' 01,/to Scal,) --r#'66 WADSWORTH BOULEVARD (SH 121)11,8..7,--F£ *51=2-j//'/ GUPHIC SCALE id. 3--M,7 1' - 60 to-rr,ent Exhibit B to Amendment of Ingress/ Egress Easement Mit¥# C. . .. » 451*F· 76> 59:b-'08(.4.8&# 4, *afg..Offifffet :emraiT/-.-.,i-*..... - . - .='..I.A--M:.4 ::1.93&4-·,143:7. NA X.6-G-17.52 .:=4-:·.-46#,R-7 2.2.44.-·.«I..... -96--24·. fi€-j tt ;F.;8)*1 3%19'12-3--·#99-0,4 .244 :3 ---ef le J.·. .2431'y %>..... 9-·- 49···*REr .f . m642·16 ·2* 2.3932-- 1.3%*-bit-%.j:ffti@ 4¥ T 141. .. + .11 .7.- - € 471·· 14-,i *669©1 piANES>:··.7.'-r = 9 -ddti,42 .'·p62.1. 1 A»€144'Al?F€iff.32 +4.2.I .: c -1/ 4.,1.1 ., #33»3*- - - . -- ' '.65 - f--- * -2- PARKING.3 - '-t 'i... 1.-1 -'4462·lf£7.thti:-i254XA-fy.-1.-4. i -- - - CD,- 01 FI 43Ii,--;4.ti--2;22.449«It{:41617.- - SS/EGRESS-,1-2-.- r'-3..f 1 - I j.- ' -r--4 - I I. --...-c INGREESS>EGRE@St--- 4 ·----1 \PROPERTY'61 -1 -4..r--4 fil-re EASEMENT . -: t 34* I r ' 21STOW B 2/SCALE: 1% 20-/7 - ---I--.I:-<.--I.-Il. *72.353 SQ FT-'s.-·t'.- . . -· 1S/TE AREA:APPROX/MATELY 1 2/3 ACRES- ' -- 4 !_11__L; -100 WEST 38TH AVENUE RWJ#ifd®131 116 4INTE'BANK it:1 616/86WHE1-' Submittal 1 C 1 l. of 1 Te It P '1 1 re W.9/216 ..:37 CDBS . _· r Z.11 . - .Ti .ly L.11: 7 -'·.1. it#U• 1-_ r. It tt: 12'J.. j :.. PAS (3· 325ed I + - Cli.y of :beat Ridge :2/12/2216 12:86 CDBA Zlit.';f -2-91:CAli·:. :E.6 CD·1213799 Hi.eul' F, 2 ZONIAG APP.ICATION FEES 1,7105 PAYFENT RECEIVED A LIT CHECK: 1579 1. 1 2 i k.-e TOTAL 1,130. 00 + \Nsf\NC Clcy of ,>eat Al--.2 12/iE,2. ,6 Ili .4 :DE A LONI],6 APPLICATi.4 : CLAC: 37 26 A en· r. -M:,UU • 1 07,32 ZO,:It.3 P.PPLICATI[,1 FEbi 223.00 P.YTENT RECTIVED .,1 9-11CrEC,': 1515 2.3.23 IOTA 2.1 C. ---- 019 NOTE: t..and use applications must be submitted BY APPOINTMENT with a CRY 0[planner. Incomplete applications will not9 Wheat be accepted-refer to Slibmittal checkliSlS. LAND USE CASE PROCESSING APPLICATION Community Development Department 7500 West 2,th Avenue • Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 • Phone (303) 235-2846 (Please print or type all information) Applicant Wazee Partners, LLC Phone 720-420-1568 Email tdowns@wazeepartners.com Address, City, State, Zip 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Owner Olive Street Development Co. LLC Phone 720-420-1568 Email tdowns@wazeepartners.com Address, City, State, Zip 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Contact Tyler Downs Phone 720-420-1568 Email tdowns@wazeepartners.com Address. City, State, Zip 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 (-1-he person listed as contact will be contacted to aIiswer queslions 1-egarding this application, provide additional infunnation when necessary, post public hearing signs. will receive a copy of the staff report prior to Public Hearing. and shall be responsible for forwarding all verbal and written communication to applicant and owner.) 7323 Location of request (address): NW Corner of 38th Ave & Upham Street (7391 &9333· W. 38th Ave, & 3845 Upham St.) Type of action requested (check one or more of the actions listed below which pertain to your request): O Change of Zone or Zone Conditions 3 Planned Development (ODP, SDP) O Planned Building Group O Temporary Use. Building, Sign O Variance/Waiver (from Section 26- El Special Use Permit 3 Conditional Use Permit Fl Site Plan El Concept Plan ) 0 Right of Way Vacation m Subdivision - specify type: O Administrative (up to 3 lots) 0 Minor (4 or 5 lots) O Major (6 or more lots) O Other: Detailed description of request: Concept plan, site plan and plat review for the West End 38 mixed use project. I certify fhat fhe information and exhibits herewith submitted are true and correct to dle best of my knowledge and that in .filing this application. 1 am acting with the knowledge and consent of those persons listed above, without whose consent t.he requested action cannot lawfully be accomplished, Applicants other than owners must submit power-of-attorney .from the owner which approved of this action on his behalf. Notarized Signature of Applicant /0-, 35*<2:==L_-_-c>State of ColoradoCounlyof f)ENUE f } ss The foregoing instrument (L.and Use Processing Application) was acknowledged by me this _Lt.r]35, or.Res °* ''A jr 9 1 - 98 1(. by 7*Y LE R 14, i.3(4 LOns £PATRICIA R NELSON NOTARY PUBUC ....SLATE OF COLORADOid-til.cliu Aff)10C.' 7-n My commission expires 10/3/ /202(1 Notary 22 19874150852-- - f My corn·misNon·Expires 10/31/2020Notary Public To be filled out by staff: Date received / 2- 12-/6 Comp Plan Design. Related Case No. <U (3016, f le Assessor's Parcel No. 6. G. ,90 Size (acres or sqft) -13, 6 7 AC re 56 965.00 100.00 10 5 0 /4 -07 C t- P6 g -461 Fee $44 65.00 Case No.MS-16-6% locul.%64Receipt No. CBAO-709. C nA /770%Quarter Section Map .5 £ 23 Pre-App Mlg. Date 2-25-/69 Case Manager M ·- kA \ Ak Current Zoning tv\(A - C Current Use Proposed Zoning Proposed Use Rev· 1/22/2016 39-5134-60-08%,3 9-234-00- 099, .39 -1-34-ec>-o'¥4, -39 - 0 34- 64-030 1777 5 Bellaire St, Ste 100 Denver, CO 80222 O: (303} 962-9164 December 5, 2016 VV VU\ v 60«divt + City of Wheat Ridge Community Development 7500 West 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 01.Af Re:Submittal for Conditional Use Application Vectra Bank Colorado - New Branch Near NEC 38th Avenue and Wadsworth Wheat Ridge, Colorado CSHQA Project No 16205.000 Dear Staff: On behalf of Vectra Bank, Colorado, CSHQA has prepared submittal and supporting documents for the replacement of their current branch bank facility. This application also supports (in tandem) the larger development known as West End 38. As required by application, we have prepared a response to the CUP criteria as required by application. Sec. 28-1118.a: The compatibility of the proposed use with the comprehensive plan. Response: The proposed use is a relocation of an existing CUP that has been in operation since 1985. Sec. 28-1118.b: The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and proposed adjacent uses, in terms of scale, site design, and operating characteristics (including traffic generation, lighting, noise, and hours of operation). Response: The proposed use is a relocation of an existing CUP that is being relocated and incorporated into a larger mixed use development. The scale and site design are fully integrated into the new development. Impacts such as traffic, lighting, hours of operation will not change from existing. The relocation of the existing CUP operation moves the source closer to the more urban streetscape. The impact of noise will be lessened with the opportunity to blend its errant noise with that of the ambient noise generated from traffic activity along West 38th Avenue. Sec. 28-1118.c: The ability to mitigate adverse and undesirable impacts to the surrounding area. including but not limited to, visual impacts, air emissions, noise, vibrations, glare, heat, odors, water pollution, and other nuisance effects. Response: The proposed use is a relocation of an existing CUP that is being relocated and incorporated into a larger mixed use development. The scale of nuisance effects is relatively small with this user. The new location of the drive-thru will be set back from the main street right-of-way and its design is a blended component of the overall building. Any errant headlight glare will be perpendicular vs. parallel people who listen - design that speaks ww w.c shq a.c om EEO/AA/MNets/Disabled City of Wheat Ridge Page 2 December 5, 2016 to the West 38th Avenue traffic flow. Immediate environmental impacts for the remaining items such as heat, noise and water pollution are traditionally very low with this type of use. Sec. 28-1118.d: Amount of traffic generated and capacity and design of roadways to handle anticipated traffic. Response: The proposed use is a relocation of an existing CUP that has been in operation since 1985. As part of the adjacent West End 38 Development, a traffic study was prepared. The results (documenting the contribution of the Vectra Bank Drive-Thru) has a 'Net-Zero' effect on the overall development. Sec. 28-1118.e: The incorporation and integration of architectural and landscape features to mitigate impacts from the proposed use. Response: As noted previously, the scale and site design are fully integrated into the new development. The design of the drive-thru is a compliment/continuation of the primary building development. This holds true to the site landscaping as well. We trust this summation meets the criteria necessary for approval. Since the current drive-thru activity is "in-essence" a lateral shift from independent to integrated (becoming a vital component of the West End 38 Development) the impacts traditionally generated by a CUP application have been addressed as 'use continuing' vs. new. We look forward to seeing this project move vertical. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, CSHQA, Inc 1/38151 James G. Murray, AIA, LEED GA Principal-Regional Manager JGM/fjm 1 West End 38 Project Proposal / Written Request Overview Wazee Partners, LLC is seeking City of Wheat Ridge approval of the Plat, Concept Plan and Site Plan for the WestEnd38 project. The proposed WestEnd38 project will be the first truly integrated mixed use project in the City of Wheat Ridge. Situated on approximately 3.7 acres at the northwest corner of 38th and Upham, the project fully embraces the City's Main Street Vision for 38th Avenue. WestEnd38 will feature 155 apartment units, approximately 12,000 square feet of retail space and a mix of outdoor public plazas and gathering spaces. The four story building will consist of 3 stories of multifamily apartments atop street oriented retail space along 38th Avenue. A new Vectra Bank building will occupy a free standing, two story building along 38th Avenue. In-line retail tenants are expected to include a mix of local restaurants and retailers. The proposed project will also include the first structured parking facility in the City of Wheat Ridge, serving both apartment residents and retail customers. This exciting mixed use project is expected to be a catalyst for further re-development along the 38th avenue corridor and will serve as the anchor project for Main Street in Wheat Ridge. The project Sponsors are Chris Downs and Tyler Downs. Wazee Partners, LLC (Chris Downs and Tyler Downs) will be the project Developer. Existing Conditions The 3.7 acre site consists of a two party land assemblage. Approximately 2.4 acres are owned by the project Sponsors. On this land sits a vacant auto repair facility which will be demolished concurrent with project construction. The remaining 1.3 acres is owned by Vectra Bank. On this property sits an approximately 18,000 square foot office building which will also be demolished concurrent with project construction. Vectra Bank will construct, own and occupy a new free standing building along 38th Avenue. Proiect Desien and Amenities The WestEnd38 project will be a 4 story, wood frame building attached to 2.5 story concrete parking structure. The 155 apartments will consist of a mix of studio, one and two bedroom units. There will be a total of 273 on-site parking stalls provided between the surface parking and structured parking areas. Last, there will be 8 on-street parking spaces. Design and Exterior Elevation: • 4 story, mid-rise construction • Elevator served / interior corridors • Materials: Brick exterior and a mix of cementitious siding with steel accents • Vinyl Windows (Dark Colored) • Flat Roof • Aluminum storefront in common areas and in ground floor retail Unit amenities will include the following: • Individually controlled heat/air conditioning • Washer Dryer in Unit • Full size appliances (refrigerator, microwave, dishwasher, disposal, electric cooktop and range) • Balconies or Juliet Doors • Garaged Parking Spaces Project amenities will include the following: • Secure Entry • Outdoor Pool • Outdoor Spa • Cabana Room • Clubhouse • Internet Cafe • Exercise Room (exercise machines and free weights) • Yoga Studio • BBQ/Outdoor Kitchen • Community Room (kitchen, lounge, TV/Game room) Green/Sustainabilitv Features The project will comply with a HUD accepted standard for Green Buildings. The project will also enroll in the Xcel Energy "Energy Design Assistance Program" for energy efficiency and demand reduction. Green/sustainability features will include: • Green Development Plan • Universal Design • High Density/Compact Development • Low Impact Development (ie - not in a Greenfield) • Access to Public Transportation • Water Conserving Fixtures • Native & Adaptive Landscaping • Water Efficient Irrigation • Energy Star Building Performance Standard • Energy Star Appliances • Energy Efficient Lighting: Interior & Exterior • Electricity and Gas Submeters • Low/No VOC Paint, Primers, Adhesives and Sealants • Recycling Service • Radon/Vapor Mitigation System Conformance with Citv Redevelopment Plans The Urban Renewal Authority for the City of Wheat Ridge (dba: Renewal Wheat Ridge) recently adopted an Urban Renewal Plan specific to the proposed WestEnd38 Project. In December of 2015, the City of Wheat Ridge adopted the Plan. The goals of the Plan and the project's conformance with those plan goals are outlined below: 1. Eliminate and prevent blight by facilitating redevelopment. a. The project will eliminate findings Of blight on the property and be a catalyst for blight removal along the main street corridor. 2. Implement elements of the Comprehensive Plan. a. The Project will be the City's first new market rate apartment community in 20+ years and will be truly mixed use project in Wheat Ridge. 3. Support and advance actions identified in existing plans related to development of vacant and under-utilized parcels that are consistent with the vision of this Plan. a. The Project will utilize three Of the most strategic and underutilized parcels on the entire Main Street Corridor. 4. Provide public infrastructure and make more efficient use of existing land. a. The Project will provide exponentially more efficient use Of existing land and will provide new curb, gutter and sidewalk infrastructure and encourage pedestrian linkages. 5. Promote sustainability - development, fiscal, resource, etc. a. The Project will utilize Tax Increment Financing and will comply with HUD compliant green development standards. 6. Advance uses that can leverage public investment in planned improvements including multiple modes of transportation (vehicular and non-vehicular). a. The 38th Avenue Main Street Corridor is currently undergoing a dramatic transformation and significant public investment into reconfiguring the corridor is currently underway. This project will leverage this investment in infrastructure along with the Urban Renewal Authority's $4.8 million Tax Increment Financing awarded to the Project. 7. Enhance the public realm including streetscape amenities, trail connections and other pedestrian-friendly improvements in a manner consistent with the existing community character. a. The Project's strategic location on the 38th Avenue Main Street Corridor will serve as a Catalyst for the City's "Main Street" Vision. 8. Encourage economic sustainability throughout the community and growth in appropriate locations. a. High density location - one of the few properly zoned, high density parcels available in the entire City Of Wheat Ridge. 9. Provide a range of financing mechanisms for improvements. a. The Project has been awarded a $4.8 million Tax Increment Financing package. 10. Provide additional opportunities for residential development to support commercial uses in the Area. a. The Project will contain over 12,000 square feet Of new retail space and will target local retailers. 11. Support existing industry by encouraging a stronger jobs-housing balance. a. This Project will be the first new market rate apartment project in the City Of Wheat Ridge in over 20 years. The building will also house some of the first new retail space along the Main Street Corridor. 12. Encourage growth and stability in local businesses. a. The Project will target local retailers to fill the new retail space. 13. Facilitate public-private partnerships. a. The Project's award Of a $4.8 million Tax Increment Financing package represents a substantial local public investment in the project. The WestEnd38 project is intended to be the first new construction project to advance the "Main Street" vision of the City of Wheat Ridge. The goal of the proposed project is to help define the city's main street by providing a "sense of place". Therefore, the project will embrace the latest mixed use and urban design principles outlined in the City's 38th Avenue Corridor Plan in support of this vision. Adopted in October of 2011, the City's 38th Avenue Corridor Plan defines West 38th Avenue between Sheridan and Wadsworth as the City's main street and identifies the corridor as a priority redevelopment area. The City's stated vision is for 38th Avenue "to be a safe, vibrant and diverse corridor in Wheat Ridge with a strong identity and robust commercial and residential markets." The plan further states that the goal "in the year 2030, is for people of all ages and abilities to live, work, learn, shop and play along 38th Avenue". The Corridor Plan also identifies the vision for "Main Street" as "a historic gathering place that integrates small shops, restaurants and services on the ground floor with residences and office space on the upper floors. This half mile stretch of 38th Avenue will be easily walkable and attract a synergy of people and activities day and night." The guiding principles of this project are as follows: • Embrace the main street design principles outlined in the corridor plan • Be a catalyst for the mixed use redevelopment of 38th Avenue • Attract a diverse mix of local, community based retailers and residents • Support healthy living by creating a safe, pedestrian friendly environment • Create an attractive, comfortable, inviting atmosphere - a true gathering place • Increase the retail and housing options for Wheat Ridge residents • Contributed to economic and real estate vitality Additionally, the project's location is overlapped by two Sub Districts - the Wadsworth Town Center District and the Main Street District, as outlined in the 38th Avenue Corridor Plan. The West End 38 Urban Renewal Plan, adopted in December of 2015, also provides guidance regarding the City's goals for a mix of retail and residential uses. The proposed project advances the goals and is in line with the guidelines outlined in both plans. The Urban Renewal Goals this project will advance are: • Be proactive, rather than reactive in advancing meritorious projects that are good for the community (Authority goal) • Create quality sustainable places • Raise standards of development • Promote economic development while preserving the community's heritage • Create jobs • Facilitate the delivery of new uses • Stabilize existing uses The Community Objectives which will be addressed through the completion of this project include: • Eliminate and prevent the spread of blight • Implement elements of the Comprehensive and Urban Renewal Plans • Ensure orderly growth throughout the community through infill rather than fringe development • Stimulate development of under-utilized properties in the Urban Renewal Area • Enhance Wheat Ridge's identity through attraction of catalyzing retail uses • Expand the City's commercial activities through redevelopment of existing space and the addition of new space • Improve relationships between uses in the Urban Renewal Area and surrounding areas with the introduction of transitional uses • Promote economic incentives in order to attract (re) investment through the use of TIF and a possible ESTIP agreement • Raise the quality of building standards in the Urban Renewal Area • Encourage higher design standards • Building improvements • Completion of incomplete streets and sidewalks • Increased road and intersection capacity • Stronger connections • Assemblage of parcels • Improvements to parking surfaces, curbs and gutters, and signs • Undergrounding of overhead utilities • Completion of curbs, gutters and sidewalks, and drainage improvements • Delivery of commercial buildings compliant with building codes (sprinklers) • Demolition of substandard structures • Remediation of environmental contamination • Site preparation Transit Oriented Development The proposed Project is located immediately proximate to two critical High Frequency RTD Bus Routes: both 38th Avenue and Wadsworth. The 38th Avenue RTD Bus stop is located immediately in front of the property on 38th Avenue and the 38th Avenue stop is located a mere 485 feet from the western boundary of the property. Additionally, the property is 2.0 miles from the Arvada Station Light Rail stop and 2.3 Miles from the Lakewood Wadsworth Station Light Rail stop. Commercial Component The WestEnd38 Project will have approximately 12,300 square feet of "Main Street" retail space (7,707 in the first floor of the main apartment building and 4,667 in the new Vectra Bank building). One of the Project's design goals is to provide successful main street retail. To accomplish this, buildings must be placed along Main Street, with parking provided on the interior of the site. Along 38th Avenue there will be a pedestrian friendly "Amenity Zone", which will include an expanded sidewalk with benches and places to gather. Attracting boutique restaurants to this retail space is a priority. Providing an outdoor amenity zone for use as a restaurant patio space and gathering spaces is critical. Targeted retailers for this Project include: • Full service restaurant • Ice Cream Shop • Coffee Shop • Neighborhood Branch Bank 7 W lical 1-lid,He- COM.MUN11'Y |)1·VEL.OP,MINr - Rev. 5/2014 Submittal Checklist: Conditional Use Permit Project Name:West End 38 Project Location NWC of 38th Avenue and Upham Street Application Contents: A conditional use permit (CUP) is associated with conditional uses in mixed use zone districts.The following items represent a complete CUP application: 41. Completed, notarized land use application form42. Application fee 43. Signed submittal checklist (this document) ..324. Proof of ownership-e.g. deed4 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s)46. Written request and description of the proposal 4 Include a response to the CUP review criteria-these are found in Section 26-1118of the municipal code Additional information which may be required: Depending on the size, scope, and complexity of the request additional documents may berequired. The submission of these documents will be discussed during the pre-application meeting. This includes, but is not limited to, the following documents (one paper copy plusAdobe .pdf file is required). * 1. Site plan application-required if new development is proposed with the CUP* 2. Proposed building elevations * 3. Trip generation letter or traffic study * 4. Drainage report (*) Included with Site Plan Review Application for the West End 38 Development As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included withthis submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded,the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event anyrevisions need to be made after the second (21 full review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. Signature: 3*_, '-2,/eCZ-,-_;:a:.Date: 64 6/(6 Name (please print). 6Ur DOW.l- S Phone: 7020 - 900 - %42 Community Development Department · (303) 235-2846 · www. ci.wheatridge.co.us Rev. 5/2014CRy of« U/lieat Ridge- COMMUNI-1¥ DEVELOPMENT L Submittal Checklist: Conditional Use Permit Project Name: New Vectra Back - Wheat Ridge Branch Project Location: Near NWC of Upham and 38th Ave. (currently at 7391 West 38th Ave.) Application Contents: A conditional use permit (CUP) is associated with conditional uses in mixed use zone districts. The following items represent a complete CUP application: X 1. Completed, notarized land use application form X 2. Application fee X 3. Signed submittal checklist (this document) X 4. Proof of ownership-e.g. deed X 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s)X 6. Written request and description of the proposal X Include a response to the CUP review criteria-these are found in Section 26-1118 of the municipal code Additional information which may be required: Depending on the size, scope, and complexity of the request additional documents may be required. The submission of these documents will be discussed during the pre-application meeting. This includes, but is not limited to, the following documents (one paper copy plus Adobe .pdf file is required)I * 1. Site plan application-required if new development is proposed with the CUP * 2. Proposed building elevations * 3. Trip generation letter or traffic study -=.I1./.-I.-.'#I...m=/lul :/:r-¥-I.I---I 721<t;...m_ -*--4. Drainage report MICHAEL JOSEPH CAMPBELL Notal-y Public State of Colorado(*) Included w/ Site Plan Notary ID: 20064004362Review Application for My Commission Expires Feb. 1,2018West End 38 Development ..1 U-11 (4& 01 l-1- /1 /LF X --(Rl V234 p 1 X / 4 As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event any revisions need to be m, - -id (29 full review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. Signature- < Date: 12.07.2016 Name (please print):James G. Murray Phone:303.962.9164 (ext. 1) Community Development Department · (303) 235-2846 - www.ci.wheatridge.co.us ' A Rev. 5/2014'- , Citv of*7 wi,datilidge-/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Submittal Checklist: Concept Plan Project Name: West End 38 Project Location: NWC of 38th Avenue and Upham Street Application Contents: A concept plan is utilized in mixed use zone districts for phased development or for properties that are 10 acres and larger. A concept plan outlines overall development concepts and provides a general graphic layout of proposed buildings pads and circulation concepts. The following items represent a complete concept plan application. 4 1. Completed, notarized land use application 4 2. Application fee 4 3. Signed submittal checklist (this document) 4 4. Proof of ownership-e.g. deed / 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s) 4 6. Written request and description of the proposal 4 7. Concept plan .£ Two (2) full size paper copies (24" x 36") -2 One (1) reduced size paper copy (11" x 17") 48. Civil documents, if required 4 9. Electronic (Adobe .pdf) files of all submittal documents-these may be provided via email, CD, DVD, or USB flash drive Form and content of Concept Plan: Project information 4 1. Title of document-centered at top of page 42. Vicinity map 43. Scale and north arrow-scale not to exceed 1"=100' 4 4. Date of plan preparation and name/address of who prepared the plan 45. Legal description 4 6. Appropriate signature blocks-see cover sheet handout n/a 7. Case history with applicable land use case numbers Graphical information 4 8. Adjoining property lot lines, buildings access, and parking 4 9. Location of existing improvements/encumbrances that will remain on site: 4 a. Buildings 4 b. Parking and loading areas 4 c. Easements, utilities, or other encumbrances that may impact development ' 4 d. Drainage ways, pond areas, ditches, irrigation canals, lakes and streams-if applicable 4 e. Streets and rights-of-way both adjacent and within the site-include names, widths, location of centerlines 4 f. Curbs, gutters, sidewalks, and bike paths Community Development Department · (303) 235-2846 · www.ci.wheatridge.co.us 1 410. Sketch plan of proposed development concepts: 4 a. Proposed building footprints and land uses 4 b. Proposed circulation concepts, including proposed streets, sidewalks, drive aisles, bike lanes, access points, and parking areas Vf c. Proposed development parcels 4 d. Proposed open space concepts-include proposed location if aggregating for more than one development site f e. Approximate boundaries of each phase n/a 11. Location of 100-year floodplain, if applicable Descriptive information 12. Statement of compliance with zoning 9 13. Description of overall development intent/character n/a a. For concept plan amendments, describe the reason for amendment n/a 14. Explanation of phasing, if applicable, including how/when build-to and open space requirements will be met 4 15. Site data in table form, including proposed land use concepts by block, lot, or pad and approximate tabulations of lot areas, density, gross square feet of buildings, building height, number of units, open space, and proposed parking counts/ratios Additional information which may be required: Depending on the size, scope, and complexity of the request additional documents may be required. The submission of these documents will be discussed during the pre-application meeting. This includes, but is not limited to, the following documents (one paper copy plus Adobe .pdf file is required): 4 1. Trip generation letter or traffic study 2. Drainage report 43. Soils report 44. Erosion control plan As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included with this submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded, the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event any revisions need to be made after the second (29) full review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittal fee. Signature: „,33*4gCSZ___z> Name (please print): 7Ru-- 2>0,,4 Dats.· 61- I A/ / G Phone: 390 -¥01 0 -(56% Rev. 5/2014 6 4I ' r Citv OtYL.- W 1-16 at Ridge -COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Submittal Checklist: Site Plan Project Name: West End 38 Project Location: NWC of 38th Avenue and Upham Street Application Contents: The site plan is used to confirm that new development, redevelopment, or significant fagade improvements meet all applicable zoning or design standards. The following items represent a complete site plan application. 4 1. Completed, notarized land use application form -4 2. Application fee 4 3. Signed submittal checklist (this document) 4 4. Proof of ownership-e.g. deed 9 5. Written authorization from property owner(s) if an agent acts on behalf of the owner(s) 4 6. Written request and description of the proposal 4 7. Plan set-including site plan, landscape plan, building elevations, streetscape plan, photometric 4 Two (2) full size paper copies (24" x 36") 4 One (1) reduced size paper copy (11" x 17") 48. One (1) color reduction of building elevations 4 9. Civil documents, if required 4 10. Electronic (Adobe .pdf) files of all submittal documents-these may be provided via email, CD, DVD, or USB flash drive Form and content of Plan Set: Note: Depending on the size of the site, it may be necessary to provide one overall site plan and additional pages to show the location of all buildings, fences, signs, parking, etc. Site Plan Project information 4 1. Title of document-centered at top of page 4 2. Vicinity map 43. Scale and north arrow-scale not to exceed 1"=100' 4 4. Date of plan preparation and name/address of who prepared the plan 45. Legal description 4 6. Appropriate signature blocks-see cover sheet handout --- 7. Signed surveyor's certification n/a 8. Case history with applicable land use case numbers 4 9. Statement of proposed uses and compliance with zoning 4 10. Site data in tabular form (numeric and percentage), including the following: 4 a. Total area of property, gross and net 4 b. Building coverage 4 c. Amount of open space required and provided-include breakdown of usable open space, hardscaped open space, and landscaped open space 9 d. Number of parking spaces required and provided 4 e. Gross floor area by use 4 f. Number of residential units and density 411. Justification of provided parking ratio, especially where shared parking is proposed Community Development Department (303) 235-2846 · www.ci.wheatridge.co.us Sample Site Data Table [more or less information may be required depending on the development proposal] Existing zoning Proposed land use Total area [acres/sq ft] gross [acres/sq ft] net Lot #[acres/sq ft] Lot #[acres/sq ft] Floor area by use [Use]sq ft [Use]sq ft Required Proposed Building coverage %max / sq ft max % /sq ft Open space/landscaping %min / sq ft min % /sq ft Useable %min / sq ft min % /sq ft Sod %max / sq ft max % /sq ft Hardscape %max / sq ft max %/sqft Parking Standard # # Accessible # # Bicycle # # Graphical information n/a 12. Legend 4 13. Property lines and dimensions (see Sheets 2 and 3 for PL dimensions) 4 14. Adjoining property lines, buildings, access, and parking 4 15. Location of improvements that are proposed and those that are existing and will remain: 4 a. Buildings-identify floor area, setback dimensions, proposed land use ¢ b. Parking and loading areas-identify handicap parking V c. Open space/landscaping-identify size (sq ft) and type (eg living, sod, hardscape) 9 d. Fences, walls, or hedges-identify height and material 4 e. Exterior lighting n/a f. Signs-identify type and height 4 g. Trash containers or storage area-identify height and material of screen walls 4 h. Areas for outside storage/display-identify height and material of screen walls 4 16. Easements, utilities, or other encumbrances that may impact development 4 17. Drainage ways, pond areas, ditches, irrigation canals, lakes and streams-if applicable 4 18. Streets and rights-of-way both adjacent and within the site-include names, widths, location of centerlines n/a 19.100-year floodplain-if applicable Landscape Plan 4 1. Title of document (centered at top of page) 4 2. Scale and north arrow (scale not to exceed 1"=100') _23. Legend 4 4. Property lines and dimensions (see Sheets 2 and 3 for property line dimensions) 40 5. Proposed buildings and parking areas 4 6. Proposed open space/landscape areas-identify dimensions/square footage 4 7. Proposed materials for all landscape and hardscape areas-identify type of ground cover, pavers, and plant material N 98. Schedule of proposed plantings, including: vt a. Amount of open space required and provided-include breakdown of usable open space, hardscaped open space, landscaped open space, required and provided shrubs, required and provided trees, required and provided street trees 4 b. Species name-common and botanical 4 c. Quantity of each species d. Size of plants/trees-gallon size of container, caliper or height of trees 4 e. Type of ground cover 4 f. Quantity of ground cover-identify total size in square feet and as a percentage of total open space 4 g. Supplementary notes-regarding irrigation, size of plant container, balled and burlapped, depth of non-living material/rock/bark, etc Sample Landscape/Plant Schedule [more or less information may be required depending on the development proposal] Required Proposed Open space/landscaping % min / sq ft min % /sq ft Useable %min / sq ft min % /sq ft Sod %max / sq ft max % /sq ft Hardscape %max / sq ft max % /sq ft On-site trees # # On-site shrubs # # Street trees # # Trees Qty Botanical Name Common Name Shrubs Qty Botanical Name Common Name Street Trees Qty Botanical Name Common Name Building Elevations 4 1. Title of document (centered at top of page) 4 2. Detailed elevations for each fagade 4 3. Detailed elevations for accessory structures 4. Detailed elevations for trash enclosures/screen walls 9 5. Material and color information 4 6. Structure dimensions-overall building height, overall building width, floor-to-floor heights 9/ 7. Summary table of materials and transparency by fagade-where material or transparency standards apply, include a table identifying required and proposed materials Sample Building Materials Summary [more or less information may be required depending on the development proposal] Required Proposed Ground floor transparency Fagade A %min / sq ft min % /sq ft Fagade B %min / sq ft min % /sq ft Secondary material (EIFS/CMU/metal panels/siding...) Fagade A %max / sq ft max % /sq ft Fagade B %max / sq ft max % /sq ft CO Streetscape Plan It may be possible to combine this sheet with the Landscape Plan as long as public street trees are disaggregated in the plant schedule. Refer to the Wheat Ridge Streetscape Design Manual for streetscape design requirements. 4 1. Title of document (centered at top of page) 4 2. Scale and north arrow (scale not to exceed 1"= 100') 4 3. Location of all existing and proposed streetscape elements/furnishings, including: 4 a. Sidewalk and amenity zones-location, dimensions, materials 9 b. Street trees-identify spacing dimensions c. Street lights 4 d. Pedestrian lights 9 e. Street furniture-benches, trash cans, etc n/a f. Bus stops n/a g. Signs 4 h. Irrigation system 4 i. Utilities and utility boxes 9 i. Curbs and ADA ramps 44. Schedule of proposed plantings, including: 4 a. Species name-common and botanical 4 b. Quantity of each species c. Size of plants/trees-gallon size of container, caliper or height of trees -£.d. Type of ground cover ,/e. Quantity of ground cover-identify total size in square feet and as a percentage of total open space 9 f. Supplementary notes-regarding irrigation, size of plant container, balled and burlapped, depth of non-living material/rock/bark, etc 47. Schedule of proposed streetscape furnishings, including: 4 a. Manufacturer 4 b. Product number 4 c. Color id. Quantity Photometric Plan 1. Title of document (centered at top of page) 42. Scale and north arrow (scale not to exceed 1"= 100') 43. Site plan showing the location of all exterior lights and a numerical grid of lighting levels in foot candles or as isoilluminance curves 4 4. A fixture schedule that includes all luminaries shown on the plan and specs for each fixture: 4 a. Manufacturer and model 4 a. Fixture type and wattage ¢ b. Mounting height of all fixtures 45. Cut sheets showing the design and finishes of all fixtures, including designation of cutoff fixtures Additional information which may be required: Depending on the size, scope, and complexity of the request additional documents may berequired. The submission of these documents will be discussed during the pre-applicationmeeting. This includes, but is not limited to, the following documents (one paper copy plusAdobe .pdf file is required): 2 Drainage reportTrip generation letter or traffic study 3. Soils report 44. Erosion control plan As applicant for this project, I hereby ensure that all of the above requirements have been included withthis submittal. I fully understand that if any one of the items listed on this checklist has been excluded,the documents will NOT be distributed for City review. In addition, I understand that in the event anyrevisions need to be made after the second 629 full review, I will be subject to the applicable resubmittalfee. Signature JA, 7 -*.Date:ld.I 6 (IG Name (please print):-73-ir- 1»w.,1 S Phone.' 99 0 - 90-0 - LS.8 l cr, OUU Execution Version 8 30 16 PURCHASEAND SALE AGREEMENT Vectra Bank Parcel 7391 West 38t11 Avenue Wheat Ridge, Colorado Seller ZB, NationalAssociation, d/b/a Vectra Bank Purchaser West End 38 LLC a Colorado linitted liability company ca-MOL Table of Contents ARTICLE I PURCHASE AND SALE OF THE PROPERTY, .......9 ARTICLE II INVESTIGATION OF THE PROPERTY ..............,11.'.....................,0.-"...........'.....3 ARTICLE In TITLE ARTICLE IV PURCHASER UNDERTAKINGS..........................'....14'.....................1....................8 ARTICLE V SELLER UNDERTAKINGS ,10 ARTICLE VI PURCHASER MORTGAGE LOAN FINANCING. 11 ARTICLE VII RECONVEYANCE OF NEW BANK PARCEL FROM PURCHASER TO ARTICLE VIn SELLER' S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES ..........,11.'..............'...12 ARTICLE 1X PURCHASER'S REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES....,„.,.......,.,,..,14 ARTICLE X SELLER'S OBLIGATION TO CLOSE ...................................................................15 ARTICLE XI PURCHASER' S OBLIGATION TO CLOSE ,,.16 ARTICLE XII CLOSING,....,17 ARTICLE XIII PRORATIONS AND CLOSING ADJUSTMENTS ..........,1.........................'..1.1 0 0 19 ARTICLE XIV REMEDIES .....................................21 ARTICLE XV GENERAL PROVISIONS „„„.....22 PURCHASEAND SALEAGREEMENT THIS PURCHASEAND SALEAGREEMENT (this"Agreement'D is made as ofthe dayofAugust, 2016 0=einafterthe"EffectiveDateD,by andbetweenZB,NationalAssociation, d/Wa Veetra Bank, whose address is VectraBank-FacilitlesDevelopment, 1650 S. ColoradoBlvd., Suite 100, Denver, CO 80222¢'Seller") and WestEnd 38 LLC, aColoradolimited liability company, whose address is 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175, Denver, Colorado 80202 ('Turchaser'D, RECITALS A. Seller is the fee simple owlier of two pal'cels of real property and bank buildirigimprovementslocatedthereon, whose address is7391 West388Avenue, comprising approximately57,150 square feet,more particularly described inthe Jul)30,2015 FidelityNationallitle CompanyCommitment Sohedule Alegal description, acopy of which legal description is attached hereto and incorporated herein, saidland andimprovements hereinafter being refened to as the"Property," B. Purchaser, through an affiliate, owns.approximately 98,000 square feet ofreal property adjacentto the Property. Purchaserintendsto combinetheProperty withPurchaser'sPropertyto develop and construct amixed use retail andmulti-family residential development (hereinafter, the'Trojecf D. C. Withinsaid.Project, andbycombininglandownedbyboth Seller andPurchaser, Purchaserintends to create a separate, newly subdivided parcel of land along 389! Avenue in a configuration agreed upon by Seller, upon which Seller can constuct anew stand-alone Vectra Bank retail fgcility (the"New BankParcel" and"New BankFacility"), D, Prior to Closing, Purchaser will prepare, submit, and process to approval and permit, a subdivisionplat and civilengineeringplans for subdivision infrastructure forthe New BankParcel building pad, E, Pilorto Closing,Seller willprepam, submit andprocesstoapprovaltheNewBank:Facility site developmentplan. F. Because Seller desires tomaintainbanldng opemtions, includingfhe safedepositfacilities, at the culrentVance Street location until completion of the New Bank Facility, at the closing and sale of the Property, Seller and Purchaser wi]1 enter into a short termlease forthe existingbank facility for the duration ofthe New Bank Facility constuctfon period, until the New Bank Facility is ready for occupancy. G. As used inthisAgreement, theterm 'Property" inoludes all ofthe following: (1) The real property described on Exhibit A attached hereto, together with all of Seller'srights, benefits, privileges, reversions, remainders, easements, rights-of-way, appurtenances, leases, subleases, appurtenances, licenses, tenements and hereditaments appertaining to or othdrwise benefiting or used inconnectionwithsaidrealproperty, together with all ofSeller's right, title andinterest.ifany, inandto any ships of land, streets, rights ofway, and alleys abutting or adjoining suchreal property (the"Land'D; G:\2008. Wazee Partners\18 · Vectra Bank.Parcel\PSA\Vectra Purchase Sato Agreemcitt Exccution Ver'sion 8 30 16.doc i »4*ex&-14- (2) The existing building& and other improvements, shuctures, parking facilities and fixtures placed, constmoted, installed or located on the Land, and all plants, trees, and other apputtenances located upon, over or under the Land (collectively, the"Improvements;" the Land and Improvements are sometimes hereinafter collectively refetred to as the "Real Property'D, but specifically excluding any fixtures or improvements used inremil banking operations; (3) All equipment and other tangible personal property owned by Seller and located, placed orinstalled on or abouttheReal Property and all tangible personal property, ifany, owned by Seller andused aspait of or in connection with the operation oftheReal Properly, butspecifically excluding any equipment andothertangiblepersonalpropertyused inretail bankingoperations (the"PersonalProperty" or"Tangible Personal Property'D; (4) All right, title and interest of Seller as landlord, under all leases, tenancies or occupancy arrangements, affecting anyportion oftheReal Property (the"TenantLeases'Q and alileases for parking spaces androofantennas, and any other commercial leases (the "Commercial Leases'D; (5) All iight title and interest of Seller, if any, in and to all governmental permits, licenses, ceitificates and authotizations, including, without limitation, water and waste water taps, storm drainage release iights, certificates of occupancy, relating to the constiuction, use or operation of the Real Property orthe Personal Property, to the extent that they are assignable (the'Termits'); (6) All right, title and interest of Seller, if any, in and to the following surveys and reports, to the extent assignable andin Seller'spossession or control: existing surveys ofthereal property, soil engineering reports, andanyPhaseI andPhaseI[EnvironmentaiRepoltsthatrelatelotheRealftopeity; and (7) Any and all otherrights, privileges, and appurtenances ownedby Seller and in any way related to, or used in connection with the operation of the Real Propere or Personal Property to the extent that they are assignable, (the "Intangible Property"). H. Sellernow desires to sell andPurchasernow desires topurchase all ofSeller'sright,title and intemst in and to the Properly, upon the terms and covenants and subjectto the conditions set forth below; AGREEMENT NOWTHEREFORE, inconsiderationoffhemutual covenants and agreements conthinedherein, and other good and valuable consideration, thereceipt and sufficiency ofwhich areherebyacknowledged, it ,is hereby agreed as follows: ARTICLE I PURCHASE AND SALE OF THE PROPERTY +X0 ' N<WN©=a¢Ir*****1442+Xx<+MkgO*X*'0 2 2015004687 1/16/201511:25 AM PGS 1 $11.00 DF $91.50 Electronically Recorded Jefferson County, CO Faye Griffin, Clerk and Recorder TD1000 Y TRUSTEE'S DEED THIS DEED is dated ,and is made between GRACE S. ALLEN , the "Grantor," as Trustee of the EDWIN S. ALLEN Trust dated OCTOBER 15. 1980, and OLIVE STREET DEVELOPMENT CO, LLC, A Colorado limited liability company (whether one, or more than one), the "Grantee," whose legal address is 2300 15'h Street, Suite 325. Denver. Colorado 80202 ofthe County ofDenver, State of Colorado. WITNESS, that the Grantor, as Trustee and pursuant to the powers conferred upon the Trustee by the Colorado Probate Code, does hereby sell, convey, assign, trans fer and set over unto the Grantee (in joint tenancy with. right of survivorship)* for and in consideration of the sum of NINE HUNDRED FIFIEEN THOUSAND AND NO/100ths DOLLARS, ($915.000.00), (as the person entitled to distribution ofthe property pursuant to the terms ofthe Trust)* the real property situate in the _ County of JEFFERSON and State of Colorado, described as follows: Parcel One: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter ofthe Southwest Quarter ofthe Southeast Quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South. Range 69 West of the 6h PM., except the West 100 feet thereof and except the North 85 feet ofltle East 175 feet ofthe Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 23, and further excepting that portion as deed to the City of Wheat Ridge in deed recorded October 8, 1990 at Reception No. 90086571, County ofJefferson, State ofColorado. Parcel Two: The North 85 feet ofthe East 175 feet of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southeast one- quarter ofthe Southwest One Quarter ofthe Southeast One Quarter (SW W SE '4 SW 74 SE bl ) of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M., County of Jefferson. State of Colorado. Parcel Three: Lot 1, E.S. Allen Subdivision, recorded January 4, 2010 at Recention No. 2010000090. County of Jefferson, State ofColorado, also known by street address as: 7323 West 38th Avenue, 3845 Upham Street, Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033-4842 with atl the appurtenances hereunto belonging. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this deed the date set forth above. GRANTOR )44-bu-2. 42.Lo GRACE S. ALLEN Trustee ofthe EDWIN S. ALLEN Trust, dated OCTOBER 15. 1980 STATE OF COLORADO SS. County of JEFFERSON &The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Januarv. 2011 by GRACE S. ALLEN as Trustee of the EDWIN S. ALLEN Trust dated October 15. 1980. C 1/3Wimess my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Public+0*i:4%(D Name and Address of Person Creating Newly 9Ef[# Lng#736#ifiptioA J'-35-106.5, C.R.S.) %*·.4/800,/ 0 f•Strike if applicable. '3*% 009*f.ON""8": I949/or! ExoW' No. 1215. Rev. 1-06. TRU5rEE'S DEED (Page 1 of 1) December 2, 2016 Community Development Staff 7500 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Re:Submittal for Conditional Use Application Vectra Bank Colorado - New Branch Near NEC 38th Avenue and Wadsworth Wheat Ridge, Colorado To Whom it May Concern: Please accept this acknowledgement that Vectra Bank has engaged and authorizes our retained A/E firm CSHQA, Inc. to submit application for the relocation/replacement of our branch facility operatingat 7391 West 38th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, CO. It remains our intent to replace this facility as part of the larger proposed development West End 38. Thank you in advance. Sincerely, Vectra Bank Cado t Jim Yankovicl Vice President / Regional Facilities IManager 11 Facilities Management PROPERTY & FACILI 1 ICS MANAGEMENT 1650 S, COLORADO BOIJLEVARD DENVER COLORADO 80222 PHONE 720947 7212 FAX 720947 7560 www.vertiabank.com 1./COLORADO UENDEN MEMBER FDIC October 13, 2016 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development Department Attn: Lauren Mikulak 7500 W. 29th Avenue Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 RE: West End 38 - Land Use Application Dear Ms. Mikulak, Vectra Bank owns the property at 7391 W. 38th Avenue in Wheat Ridge, CO. I, Eileen Breslin, Vice President - Property and Purchasing of Vectra Bank, hereby authorize Wazee Partners, LLC to act as the owner's agent in matters pertaining to the preparation and submittal of land use application associated with the West End 38 development. Simcerely, 6.66U Eileen S Breslin Vice President, Property and Purchasing eileen.breslin@vectrabank.com 720-947-7211 PROPERTY & FACILITIES MANAGEMENT 1650 S COLORADO BOULEVARD DENVER COLORADO 80222 PHONE 720947 7212 FAX 720947 7560 www.vectrabank com -1/COLORADO CUMAMEMBER FDIC * FIDELITY Denver, CO 80237 4643 S. Ulster St. #500 ' NATIONALTITLE COMPANY Phone: (720) 200-1200 Fax: (303) 889-1959 DATE: September 27,2016 FILE NITMBER: 508-F0563184-017-017 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 7391 West 38th Avenue, 3845 Upham Street, 7323 West 38th Avenue ancd a parcel of vacant land. Wheat Ridge. CO 80033 Blrl'ER/BORROWER: Informational Commitment OWNERCS): Olive Street Development Co, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and Wadsworth Building Corporation, a Colorado corporation (no listing is currently found with the Colorado SOS) 3'OUR REFERENCE NUMBER: ASSESSOR PARCEL NIMBER: 025826/39-234-00-0861 109822/39-234-00-088. 459635/39-234-00-088 and 459635/39-234-04-030 PLEASE TAKE NOTE OF THE FOLLOW ING REVISED TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN None. WIRED FUNDS ARE REQUIRED ON ALL CASH PURCHASE TRANSACTIONS. FOR WIRING INSTRUCTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ESCROW OFFICE AS NOTED ON THE TRANSMITTAL PAGE OF THIS COMMITMENT. TO: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company ATTN:Title Only 4643 S. Ulster St. #500 PHONE:(720) 200-1200 Denver, CO 80237 FAX:(303) 889-1959 E-MAIL: TO:Moye White LLP 1400 16th Street Denver, CO 80202 TO:Downs Law Firm LLC 230015th Street Suite 425 Denver, CO 80202 TO:Wazee Partners 2300 15th St. Suite 325 Denver, CO 80202 ATTN:Keely Downs PHONE:(303) 292-7915 FAX:(303) 292-4510 E-MAIL:Keely.Downs@moyewhite.com ATTN:Chris Downs PHONE:(303) 832-4400 FAX:(877) 444-1877 E-MAIL:chris@cdownslaw.com ATTN:Tyler Downs PHONE:(720) 428-1568 FAX:(000) 000-0000 E-MAIL:tdowns@wazeepartners.com TO:Fidelity National Title Insurance Company ATTN:Noreen Behringer - TITLE OFFICER 4643 S. Ulster PHONE:(303) 889-8094 Ste 500 FAX:(000) 000-0000 Denver, CO 80237 E-MAIL:nbehringer@fnf.com TO:Commercial Escrow FNTIC ATTN:Title Only 4643 S. Ulster St. #500 PHONE:(720) 200-1200 Denver, CO 80237 FAX:(303) 889-1959 E-MAIL: END OF TRANSMITTAL Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA . members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION Title Association..t) Fidelity National Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Commitment No:508-F0563184-017-017 1. Effective Date:September 16, 2016 at 7:00 A.M. 2. Policy or policies to be issued: Proposed Insured Policy Amount (a) ALTA Owners Policy 6-17-06 $0.00 Informational Commitment (b) None $0.00 $ 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest in the land is at 111£ Effective Date vested in: Olive Street Development Co., LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and Wadsworth Building Corporation, a Colorado corporation (no listing is currently found with the Colorado SOS) 5. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows: See Attached Legal Description (for informational purposes only) 7391 West 38th Avenue, 3845 Upham Street, 7323 West 38th Avenue and a parcel of vacant land, Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 PREMIUMS: Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA AMERICAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land 5;522 Title Association. 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 informational Binder 550.00 Attached Legal Description Parcel One: The Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter ofthe Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 23. Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th P.M., except the West 100 feet thereof and except the North 85 feet of the East 175 feet of the Southwest Quarter ofthe Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter ofthe Southeast Quarter of said Section 23, and further excepting that portion as deed to the City of Wheat Ridge in deed recorded October 8,1990 at Reception No. 90086571, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Parcel Two: The North 85 feet of the East 175 feet of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southeast one-quarter ofthe Southwest One Quarter of the Southeast One Quarter (SW 14 SE 14 SW 14 SE 94) of Section 23, Township 3 South. Range 69 West of the 68 P.M., County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Parcel Three: Lot 1, E.S. Allen Subdivision. recorded January 4, 2010 at Reception No. 2010000090, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. Parcel Four (A): A part of the Southeast one-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 30.00 feet Northerly and 526.40 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Southeast onequarter; Thence Northerly, parallel with the West line of said Southeast one-quarter a distance of 421.15 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds and along a line parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter a distance of 131.65 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 13 ininutes 37 seconds a distance of 421.15 feet to a point 30.00 feet Northerly ofthe said South line of the Southeast one-quarter; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 46 minutes 23 seconds and along a line of 30.00 feet Northerly of and parallel to the said South line of the Southeast one-quarter a distance of 131.82 feet to the Point of Beginning. SAVE AND EXCEPT that portion of the above-described land conveyed to the American Oil Company on the 21 st day of March, 1972, to wit: A part of the Southeast 14 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 30.00 feet Northerly and 526.40 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Southeast '/4; Thence Northerly, parallel with the West line of said Southeast 14, a distance of 100.0 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds and along a line parallel with the South line of said Southeast 1 /4, a distance of 131.79 feet; Thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds. a distance of 100.00 feet to a point 30.00 feet Northerly of the South line of the Southeast 'A; Thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 46 minutes 23 seconds and along a line of 30.00 feet Northerly of Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA == LAND TITLEmembers in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land AOrtATION Title Association. 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 and parallel to the South line of the Southeast 1/4, a distance of 131.82 feet to the parcel of land, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. SAVE AND EXCEPT that portion of the above-described land described as Parcel Four (B) as follows: Parcel Four (B): A parcel of land located in the Southeast one-quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Jefferson. State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point 30.00 feet Northerly and 45.00 feet Easterly of the Southwest corner of said Southeast onequarter, which point is the Southwest corner of Block 1, Park and Shop Subdivision First Amendment; thence East along the South line of said Block 1,30.00 feet North of and parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 481.40 feet to the most Southeast corner of said Block 1; thence Northerly along the East line of said Block l,parallel with the West line ofsaid Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 306.15 feet to the true Point of Beginning; thence continuing Northerly, along said Easterly line and parallel with said West line, a distance of 115.00 feet to an Easterly corner of said Block 1; thence on an angle to the right of 89 degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds and along an Easterly line of said Block 1 and parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 131.65 feet to an Easterly corner of said Block 1; thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 13 minutes 37 seconds, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence on an angle to the right of 90 degrees 46 minutes 23 seconds and parallel with the South line of said Southeast one-quarter, a distance of 131.70 feet, more or less, to the true Point of Beginning. Parcel Five: The West 100 feet of the SWIM SE1/4 SWIM SE 1 /4 of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West ofthe 6th P.M., except the South 30.00 feet thereof for North 38th Avenue, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA AMERICAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land 35,NE Title Association. d 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 SCHEDULE B - Section 1 Requirements The following requirements must be met: This commitment if for informational purposes. END OF REQUIREMENTS Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA gAERICAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land LAND T]TLE A.OCIATION Title Association. 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 SCHEDULE B - Section 2 Exceptions Any policy we issue will have the following exceptions unless they are taken care of to our satisfaction: 1. Any facts, rights, interests or claims that are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land. 2. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the Public Records. 3. Any encroachments, encumbrances, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey ofthe Land and not shown by Public Records. 4. Any lien or right to a lien, for services. labor or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the Public Records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, i f any, created, first appearing in the Public Records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed Insured acquires of record for the value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Water rights, claims oftitle to water. whether or not these matters are shown by the Public Records. 7. All taxes and assessments, now or heretofore assessed, due or payable. 8. Any existing leases or tenancies, and any and all parties claiming by, through or under said lessees. NOTE: The following matters affects Parcels One, Two and Three: 9. Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Development Agreement as set forth below: Recording Date: Recording No.: August 16,1979 Reception No. 79074204 10.Resolution and Any tax, lien, fee, or assessment by reason of inclusion of the Land in the Wadsworth Town Center Urban Renewal Plan. as evidenced by instrument(s) recorded November 20,1991 at Reception No. 91108123. 11. Any tax, lien. fee, or assessment by reason of inclusion of the Land in the Wheat Ridge Water District, as evidenced by instrument(s) recorded January 16,2001 at Reception No. F 1 170792. 12. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted iii a document: Granted to:City of Wheat Ridge EN 1Purpose:Permanent Easement Recording Date:October 8,1990 Recording No:Reception No. 90086585 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land 32]TIN Title Association. 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 13. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to:Public Service Company of Colorado Purpose:public wtilities Recording Date:December 18,1985 Recording No:Reception No. 85122823 eli 5 14. Notes, easements, restrictions and conditions as set forth on plat recorded January 4,2010 at Reception No. 2010000090.V A ubted e. N. 1 + 6 15. Reservations as contained in Deed recorded December 28,2012 at Reception No. 2012139837. E.N. 3 16. The following matters as disclosed by survey prepared by Falcon Surveying, Inc.,Job No. 140813, dated September 17,2014: (a) Public utilities shown thereon and not lying within a found, recorded easement(s). (b) Any used of others in and to those certain gravel and concrete drives shown thereon and traversing the land and appearing to adjoin to neighboring properties to the east and north as shown creating possible joint access rights. 17. Deed of Trust from Olive Street Development Co., LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. to the Public Trustee of Jefferson County, for the benefit of FirstBank, Its Successors and/or Assigns, securing an original principal indebtedness of $484,000.00, and any other amounts and/or obligations dated February 16,2016, recorded February 24,2016 at Reception No. 2016017212. NOTE: The following matters affects Parcels Four and Five: 18. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Public Service Company of Colorado Purpose: utility and incidental purposes Recording Date: September 15,1966 Recording No: Book 1897. Page 55 19. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Public Service Company of Colorado Purpose: utility and incidental purposes Recording Date: December 4.1974 Recording No: Book 2685, Page 660 20.Terms, conditions, provisions, agreements and obligations contained in the Development Agreement as set forth below: Recording Date: August 16,1979 Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA IMIRIAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited- Reprinted under license from the American Land LAND TITLE AS'OCIATION Title Association. 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 Recording No.: Reception No. 74204 21.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Public Service Company of Colorado Purpose: utility and incidental purposes Recording Date: December 18,1985 Recording No: Reception No. 122823 Et115 22.Ingress and Egress Easements as evidenced by Map or Site Plan recorded June 17,1986 at Reception No. 86065671.not r¥*f fd - NLU*»60' 23.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted iii a document: Granted to: City of Wheat Ridge Purpose: permanent easement Recording Date: October 8,1990 Recording No: Reception No. 90086600 24.Any tax, lien, fee, or assessment by reason of inclusion of the Land in the Urban Renewal Area and any covenants, conditions and restrictions therein shown, as evidenced by instrument(s) recorded November 20,1991 at Reception No. 91108123. 25.Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to: Public Service Company of Colorado Purpose: utility and incidental purposes Recording Date: September 12,1995 Recording No: Reception No. 114210 26.Any tax, lien, fee, or assessment by reason of inclusion of the Land in the Wheat Ridge Water District. as evidenced by instrument(s) recorded January 16,2001 at Reception No. F 1 170792. 27.Please be advised that our search did not disclose any open Deeds of Trust of record. If you should have knowledge of any outstanding obligation, please contact the Title Department immediately for further review. END OF EXCEPTIONS Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA AMIRICAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land XENT Title Association.29•e 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 Fidelity National Title® Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued by Fidelity National Title Insurance Company Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, a California corporation ("Company"), for a valuable consideration, commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the Proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee ofthe estate or interest in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges and compliance with the Requirements; all subject to the provisions of Schedule A and B and to the Conditions ofthis Commitment. The Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the Proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A by the Company. Allliability and obligation under this Commitment shall cease and terminate 6 months after the Effective Date or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue the policy or policies is not fault ofthe Company. The Company will provide a sample of the policy form upon request. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company has caused its corporate name and seal to be affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A. By :SEAL #atest Countersigned by:W 1+1 1.-, Randy Qurk. Resident34- E- li),3 D A-- Authorized Signature Michael Grh·elle, Secretmy Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Z,gZ Title Association. 6 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 CONDITIONS 1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or other security instrument. 2. If the proposed Insured has or acquired actual knowledge of any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced by failure to so disclose such knowledge. Ifthe proposed insured shall disclose such knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter, the Company at its option may amend Schedule B ofthis Commitment accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions. 3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named proposed insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policies or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and Conditions and the Exclusions from Coverage of the form of policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as expressly modified herein. 4. This Commitment is a contract to issue one or more title insurance policies and is not an abstract of title or a report of the condition of title. Any action or actions or rights of action that the proposed Insured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the status of the mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment must be based on and are subject to the provisions of this Commitment. 5. The policy to be issued contains an arbitration clause. All arbitrable matters when the Amount of Insurance is $2,000,000 or less shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. You may review a copy ofthe arbitration rules at http://www.alta.org. Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA AMERICAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land 1-3,INZ Title Association. 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT • Pursuant to Section 38-35-125 of Colorado Revised Statutes and Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 3-5-1 (Section 7), if the parties to the subject transaction request us to provide escrow-settlement and disbursement services to facilitate the closing of the transaction, then all funds submitted for disbursement must be available for immediate withdrawal. • Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 3-5-1, Paragraph G of Section 7, requires that "Every title insurance company shall be responsible to the proposed insured(s) subject to the terms and conditions of the title insurance commitment, other than the effective date of the title insurance commitment, for all matters which appear of record prior to the time of recording whenever the title insurance company, or its agent, conducts the closing and settlement service that is in conjunction with its issuance of an owners policy oftitle insurance and is responsible for the recording and filing of legal documents resulting from the transaction which was closed". Provided that Fidelity National Title Insurance Company conducts the closing ofthe insured transaction and is responsible for recording the legal documents from the transaction, exception No. 5 in Schedule B-2 will not appear in the Owner's Title Policy and Lender's Title Policy when issued. • Colorado Division of Insurance Regulation 3-5- 1, Paragraph L of Section 7, requires that prospective insured(s) of a single family residence be notified in writing that the standard exception from coverage for unfiled Mechanics or Materialmans Liens may or may not be deleted upon the satisfaction of the requirement(s) pertinent to the transaction. These requirements will be addressed upon receipt of a written request to provide said coverage, or i f the Purchase and Sale Agreement/Contract is provided to the Company then the necessary requirements will be reflected on the commitment. • If the sales price of the subject property exceeds $100,000.00 the seller shall be required to comply with the Disclosure of Withholding Provisions of C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (Nonresident Withholding). • Section 39-14-102 of Colorado Revised Statutes requires that a Real Property Transfer Declaration accompany any conveyance document presented for recordation in the State of Colorado. Said Declaration shall be completed and signed by either the grantor or grantee. • Recording statutes contained in Section 30-10-406(3)(a) of the Colorado Revised Statutes require that all documents received for recording or filing in the clerk and recorder's office shall contain a top margin of at least one inch and a left, right, and bottom margin of at least one-half of an inch. The clerk and recorder may refuse to record or file a document that does not conform to requirements of this paragraph. • Section 38-35-109 (2) ofthe Colorado Revised Statutes, 1973, requires that a notation ofthe purchasers legal address, (not necessarily the same as the property address) be included on the face of the deed to be recorded. • Regulations of County Clerk and Recorder's offices require that all documents submitted for recording must contain a return address on the front page of every document being recorded. • Pursuant to Section 10-1 1-122 of the Colorado Revised Statutes, 1987 the Company is required to disclose the following information: o The subject property may be located in a special taxing district. o A Certificate of Taxes Due listing each taxing jurisdiction shall be obtained from the County Treasurer or the County Treasurer's authorized agent. o Information regarding special districts and the boundaries of such districts may be obtained from the Board of County Commissioners, the County Clerk and Recorder or the County Assessor. • Pursuant to Section 10-11-123 ofthe Colorado Revised Statutes, when it is determined that a mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate, the Company is required to disclose the following information: that there is recorded evidence that a mineral estate has been severed, leased, or otherwise conveyed froin the surface estate and that there is a substantial likelihood that a third party holds some or all interest in oil, gas, other minerals, or geothermal energy in the property; and that such mineral estate may include the right to enter and use the property without the surface owner's permission. Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA AMERICAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land ..5/CIATION LAND TITLE Title Association. 09/27/2016 1:12 PM Commitment No: 508-F0563184-017-017 Note: Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Commitment, if the policy to be issued is other than an ALTA Owner's Policy (6/17/06), the policy may not contain an arbitration clause, or the terms of the arbitration clause may be different from those set forth in this Commitment. If the policy does contain an arbitration clause, and the Amount of Insurance is less than the amount if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties. Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA AMERICAN members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Ni-32;,ILE Title Association, FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL PRIVACY NOTICE At Fidelity National Financial, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiary companies (collectively, "FNF", "our" or "we"), we value the privacy of our customers. This Privacy Notice explains how we collect, use, and protect your information and explains the choices you have regarding that information. A summary of our privacy practices is below. We also encourage you to read the complete Privacy Notice following the summary. Types of Information Collected. You may provide us with certain personal information, like your contact information, social security number (SSN), driver's license, other government ID numbers, and/or financial information.We may also receive information from your Internet browser, computer and/or mobile device. Use of Your Information. We may use your information to provide products and services to you (or someone on your behalf), to improve our products and services, and to communicate with you about our products and services. We do not give or sell your personal information to parties outside of FNF for their use to market their products or services to you. Choices With Your Information. Your decision to submit personal information is entirely up to you. You can opt-out of certain disclosures or use of your information or choose to not provide any personal information to us. Information From Children. We do not knowingly collect information from children under the age of 13, and our websites are not intended to attract children. Access and Correction. If you desire to see the information collected about you and/or correct any inaccuracies, please contact us in the manner specified in this Privacy Notice. The California Online Privacy Protection Act. Certain FNF websites collect information on behalf of mortgage loan servicers. The mortgage loan servicer is responsible for taking action or making changes to any consumer information submitted through those websites. Your Consent To This Privacy Notice. By submitting information to us and using our websites, you are accepting and agreeing to the terms of this Privacy Notice. FNF Privacy Notice Effective: April 1.2016 How Information is Collected. We may collect personal information directly from you from applications, forms, or communications we receive from you, or from other sources on your behalf, in connection with our provision of products or services to you. We may also collect browsing information from your Internet browser, computer, mobile device or similar equipment. This browsing information is generic and reveals nothing personal about the user. Security Of Your Information. We utilize a combination of security technologies, procedures and safeguards to help protect your information from unauthorized access, use and/or disclosure. We communicate to our employees about the need to protect personal information. When We Share Information. We may disclose your information to third parties providing you products and services on our behalf, law enforcement agencies or governmental authorities, as required by law, and to parties with whom you authorize us to share your information. Privacy Outside the Website. We are not responsible for the privacy practices of third parties, even if our website links to those parties' websites. Do Not Track Disclosures. We do not recognize "do not track" requests from Internet browsers and similar devices. International Use. By providing us with your information, you consent to the transfer, processing and storage of such information outside your country of residence, as well as the fact that we will handle such information consistent with this Privacy Notice. Contact FNE If you have questions or wish to contact us regarding this Privacy Notice, please use the contact information provided at the end of this Privacy Notice. FIDELITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL, INC. PRIVACY NOTICE FNF respects and is committed to protecting your privacy. We pledge to take reasonable steps to protect your Personal Information (as defined herein) and to ensure your information is used in compliance with this Privacy Notice. This Privacy Notice is only in effect for information collected and/or owned by or on behalf of FNF, including collection through any FNF website or online services offered by FNF (collectively, the "Website"), as well as any information collected offline (e.g., paper documents). The provision of this Privacy Notice to you does not create any express or implied relationship, nor create any express or implied duty or other obligation, between FNF and you. Types of Information Collected We may collect two types of information: Personal Information and Browsing Information. Personal Information. The types of personal information FNF collects may include, but are not limited to: • contact information (e.g., name, address, phone number, email address); • social security number (SSN), driver's license, and other government ID numbers; and • financial account or loan information. Browsing Information. The types of browsing information FNF collects may include, but are not limited to: Internet Protocol (or IP) address or device ID/UDID, protocol and sequence information; browser language; • browser type; · domain name system requests; browsing history; • number of clicks; • hypertext transfer protocol headers; and • application client and server banners. How Information is Collected In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources: • applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative, whether electronic or paper, · communications to us from you or others; • information about your transactions with, or services performed by, us, our affiliates or others; and • information from consumer or other reporting agencies and public records that we either obtain directly from those entities, or from our affiliates or others. We may collect Browsing Information from you as follows: Browser Log Files. Our servers automatically log, collect and record certain Browsing Information about each visitor to the Website. The Browsing Information includes only generic information and reveals nothing personal about the user. • Cookies. From time to time, FNF may send a "cookie" to your computer when you visit the Website. A cookie is a small piece of data that is sent to your Internet browser from a web server and stored on your computer's hard drive. When you visit the Website again, the cookie allows the FNF Privacy Notice Effective: April 1.2016 Website to recognize your computer, with the goal of providing an optimized user experience. Cookies may store user preferences and other information. You can choose not to accept cookies by changing the settings of your Internet browser. If you choose not to accept cookies, then some functions ofthe Website may not work as intended. Use of Collected Information Information collected by FNF is used for three main purposes: To provide products and services to you. or to one or more third party service providers who are performing services on your behalf or in connection with a transaction involving you; • To improve our products and services; and • To communicate with you and to inform you about FNF's products and services. When We Share Information We may share your Personal Information (excluding information we receive from consumer or other credit reporting agencies) and Browsing Information with certain individuals and companies, as permitted by law, without first obtaining your authorization. Such disclosures may include, without limitation, the following: · to agents, representatives, or others to provide you with services or products you have requested, and to enable us to detect or prevent criminal activity, fraud, or material misrepresentation or nondisclosure; • to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform other functions on our behalf; • to law enforcement or other governmental authority in connection with an investigation, or civil or criminal subpoenas or court orders; and/or · to other parties authorized to receive the information in connection with services provided to you or a transaction involving you. We may disclose Personal Information and/or Browsing Information when required by law or in the good-faith belief that such disclosure is necessary to: • comply with a legal process or applicable laws; • enforce this Privacy Notice; • investigate or respond to claims that any information provided by you violates the rights of a third party; or • protect the rights, property or personal safety of FNF, its users or the public. We make efforts to ensure third party contractors and service providers who provide services or perform functions on our behalf protect your information. We limit use of your information to the purposes for which the information was provided. We do not give or sell your information to third parties for their own direct marketing use. We reserve the right to transfer your Personal Information, Browsing Information, as well as any other information, in connection with the sale or other disposition of all or part of the FNF business and/or assets, or in the event of our bankruptcy, reorganization, insolvency. receivership or an assignment for the benefit of creditors. You expressly agree and consent to the use and/or transfer of this information in connection with any of the above-described proceedings. We cannot and will not be e responsible for any breach of security by any third party or for any actions of any third party that receives any of the in formation that is disclosed to us. Choices With Your Information Whether you submit your information to FNF is entirely up to you. If you decide not to submit your information, FNF may not be able to provide certain products or services to you. You may choose to prevent FNF from using your information under certain circumstances ("opt out"). You may opt out of receiving communications from us about our products and/or services. Securitv And Retention Of Information FNF is committed to protecting the information you share with us and utilizes a combination of security technologies, procedures and safeguards to help protect it from unauthorized access, use and/or disclosure. FNF trains its employees on privacy practices and on INF's privacy and information security policies. FNF works hard to retain information related to you only as long as reasonably necessary for business and/or legal purposes. Information From Children The Website is meant for adults. The Website is not intended or designed to attract children under the age of thirteen (13). We do not collect Personal Information from any person that we know to be under the age of thirteen (13) without permission from a parent or guardian. Privacv Outside the Website The Website may contain links to other websites, including links to websites of third party service providers. FNF is not and cannot be responsible for the privacy practices or the content of any ofthose other websites. International Users Because FNF's headquarters is located in the United States, we may transfer your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to the United States. By using our website and providing us with your Personal Information and/or Browsing Information, you understand and consent to the transfer, processing and storage of such information outside your country of residence, as well as the fact that we will handle such information consistent with this Privacy Notice. Do Not Track Disclosures Currently, our policy is that we do not recognize "do not track" requests from Internet browsers and similar devices. The California Online Privacy Protection Act For some websites which FNF or one of its companies owns. such as the Customer CareNet ("CCN"), FNF is acting as a third party service provider to a mortgage loan servicer. In those instances, we may collect certain information on behalf of that mortgage loan servicer, including: • first and last name; FNF Privacy Notice Effective: April 1.2016 • property address. • user name and password: • loan number; social security number - masked upon entry; • email address; security questions and answers; and • IP address. The information you submit is then transferred to your mortgage loan servicer by way of CCN. The mortgage loan servicer is responsible for taking action or making changes to any consumer information submitted through this website. For example, if you believe that your payment or user information is incorrect, you must contact your mortgage loan servicer. CCN does not share consumer information with third parties, other than those with which the mortgage loan servicer has contracted to interface with the CCN application. All sections of this Privacy Notice apply to your interaction with CCN, except for the sections titled Choices with Your Information, and Access and Correction. If you have questions regarding the choices you have with regard to your personal information or how to access or correct your personal information, contact your mortgage loan servicer. Access and Correction To access your Personal Information in the possession of FNF and correct any inaccuracies, please contact us by email at privacy@fnf.com or by mail at: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer Your Consent To This Privacy Notice By submitting Personal Information and/or Browsing Information to FNF, you consent to the collection and use of information by FNF in compliance with this Privacy Notice. We reserve the right to make changes to this Privacy Notice. If we change this Privacy Notice, we will post the revised version on the Website. Contact FNF Please send questions and/or comments related to this Privacy Notice by email at privacy@fnf.com or by mail at: Fidelity National Financial, Inc. 601 Riverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 32204 Attn: Chief Privacy Officer Copyright © 2016. Fidelity National Financial, Inc. All Rights Reserved. EFFECTIVE AS OF APRIL 1,2016 L w tor + Jouft, C- 75 r 16 9 . wet Sf t r I 30+ ¥ f 441 T j WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY SOUTH RETAIL (NON-RESIDENTIAL) FACADE EAST RETAIL (NON.RESIDENTIAL) FACADE 33'-4'9'-8' REQUIRED 60% MIN / 317 SQ FT MIN 30% MIN / 197 SQ FT MIN PROPOSED 79%/417 SQFT 64% / 421 SO FT 172'-8 MATERIAL SCHEDULE MASONRY VENEER (1) MASONRY VENEER (21 FIBER CEMENT SIDING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING WINDOW MULLIONS COMMENTS RED TEXTURED RED LIGHT GREY DARK GREY DARK BRONZE 108'-0' PREFINISHED METAL SIDING FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING FIBER CEMENT HOR]ZONTAL SIDING MASONRY VENEER (1) - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING MASONRY VENEER (1) PREF NISHED METAL GUARDRAIL PREFINISHEDMTALGUARDTL n f_.r-- _ 1* 1 /1 PARAPET / 9 -T 150'-0" i LEVEL 4 4/ 138·-8- ' LEVEL 3 /R =L 127'-4·' 1 LEVEL 2 /1 116'-0 i-902 L LEVEL h. MASONRY VENEER 0 - \\ PRECAST CONCRETE PLANTER - MASONRY VENEER (2) OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16"=1'.0" 89'-8'23-9 272'-8' PREFINISHED METAL- SIDING - PREFINISHED METAL GUARORAIL (BRIDGE) PREFINISHED METAL- SIDING FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING PREFINISHED METAL GUARDRAIL - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING t MASONRY VENEER (1) m 1 1 FIBER CEME r- 1 11 111 J 111,li NT HORIZONTAL SIDING ROOF /1 150-0 ) _ _ LEVEL 4 G 138'-8 _ _ LEVEL 3 ©127·-4· LEVEL 2 /1 116-0- 0 LEVEL 1 C 100•-0· ' LEVEL Bl /189'4· 1 MASONRY VENEER (2) CAS r iN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP -CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE PLANTER L-ENTRY INTO GARAGE MASONRY VENEER (2) _-OVERALL-EAST-ELEVATION 1/16" =110"1-5-f ISSUED: 12/09/2016Kimley»>Horn SA+ R WAZE E |Al -2-1 1 1 , 1 U.2/EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERS SHEET 06 OF 16SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 2:05:26 PC:\Users\]emhof\Documents\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_Jemhof.rvt!09TB-Site Plan.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MASONRY ENCLOSURE --fir , MATERIAL SCHEDULE MASONRY VENEER (1) MASONRY VENEER (2) FIBER CEMENT SIDING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING WINDOW MULLIONS COMMENTS RED TEXTURED RED LIGHT GREY DARK GREY DARK BRONZE arl 1METAL PANEL GATE U..a i 17 VARIES TYPICAL TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/4 '=1 3-0- 1041-7 131'-5"23'-9'89-8 EXTENTS OF GARAGE BRIDGE BEYOND PORTION OF BUILDING BEYOND FIBER CEM ENT HORIZONTAL SIDING --PREFABRICATED METAL- GUARDRAIL -MASONRY VENEER (1) - PREFABRICATED METAL SIDING - PREFABRICATED METAL SIDING BUILDING BEYOND - TE10 1 1. 0 Fri 661 £E F it 'Pll 3322-4 ROOF /3150*.0· 1 LEVEL# p 138'-8 0 LEVEL 3 E 127'4 0 1 LEVEL 2 8t 116·-0- L. LEVEL 1 /7 1 DO·-0 1 LEVEL 81 *rh894• 1 CONCRETE BARRIER (3'-0· MIN HT.)MASONRY VENEER (2) SCREEN WALL CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP PREFABRICATED METAL MESH SCREEN -MASONRY VENEER (2) OVERALL WEST ELEVATION 1/16" =1+41 233'-3 EXTENTS OF GARAGE BUILDING BEYOND | FIBERCEMENTHORZOTIDING--4- - _ T----_----- jr-jifidill'-r MASONRY VENEER {2) -n rr-1-1 n 111 11111111111 11 11 1 111'1111 . 111111111111 1 11 HI 16·2 Wildil 111 ' i ' PARAPET ./el ROOF-11 150'-0. ' .Ill,1, J _I® 6_LEVELI /, . - _ -LEyELL-Ar12Tarr=1 rrir- rn i 'll l' ''"_1Ill!Illl lit .......- 1 lili 11 LEyELZ 116'-0 LEVEL 1 /Fi 100'2-7- LEVEL 81 I1 liu· ) L- PREFABRICATED METAL MESH SCREEN -CONCRETE BARRIER (3'.0" MIN HT.) OVERALL NORTH GARAGE ELEVATION 1/16" =1'-0 ISSUED: 12/09/2016Kimley»>Horn SA+ R WAZE E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERS SHEET 07 OF 16SHEARSADKINS ROCK MORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 2:05:28 PC:\Users\jemhof\Documents\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_jemhof.rvt)09TB-Site Plon.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MATERIAL SCHEDULE NO. 1 NAME COMMENTSTO. FEATURE-WALL h SIGN BY OTHERS n42 SOFT +/- \,ST-1 HARD COAT STUCCO LIGHT GREY -1T.O. HIGH /8BAPET 4 1 WINDOW MULLIONS I BLACK TO. LOW P&RAPET ,M-312*TO-7-METAL COPING DARK GREY -162/COLO Il HO (N) WALL - MOUNTED REQUIRED [ PROPOSED FIXTURE SECOND FLOOR h T.O. CANOPY SECONDARY MATERIAL ' METAL PANEL-FACADEC 30% MAX '08%B.O. @8NOPY *A 4" STEEL BOLLARDS, CONC. FILLED (TYP) FINISH FLOOR *A 1 NORTH ELEVAT ON - FACADE A 99J - 6" </ 3/16" 1' 0 SIGN BY OWNER n SIGN BY 42 SQFT +/- \ OWNER T.O. Hlqll PRBAPEL_1 42 SOFT +/- *11 11 Iqu 4 I347-JECTEA @AIA C010 A.0 FINISHFLOOR 4 QTRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION / 3/16· =1'-0 SECOND FLOOR p 113·-0" 4 M 0 l 113'.0· 1-I.OCANQEL+- B.O. Ceoen_01- FINISH FLOOR / 1 ifiF7-E _FINISH FLOOR h 9WEST ELEVATION FACADE B \12Ii-PLAN /1 TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION ISSUED: 12/09/2016 (VECTRA BANK) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS peone wh- 12'ten · desgn 'hal gr·nik:·SHEARS AD'INS ROCKMORE SHEET 9 OF 16 f L WEST END 38 SITE PLAN WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO NAME COMMENTS T.O. FEATURIVWL HARD COAT STUCCO LIGHT GREY M-2 WINDOW MULLIONS BLACKT.O. HIGH PARAPET h METAL COPING --bARK GREY 1 REQUIRED PROPOSED Lt!RTH - FACADE A 30% MIN 12% ] -SOUTH-FACADEA40%-MIN18% ' EAST - FACADE A 1 30% MIN 15% O. CANOPY SECONDARY MATERIAL 113'-0 METAL PANEL - FACADE C 1 30% MAX I 08%SECOND FLOOR h M-1 B.O. CANCEL11 /2 0M.3 /1 FINISH FLOOR h 1 SOUTH ELEVATION - FACADE C W SITE P 99'- 6- 3/16" 01'-0 SIGN BY OWNER 2 SQFT +A T.O. FE,qkli*al-1 lili- T.0. HIGH PABAPET h131'.. 7 /1 T.Q.1QY' PARAPET *1 S-1 S-1 M-M-2 M·3 M.3 M.1 f13' - 0 4-134 -SECOND FLOOR VESTINLE HEIGH] A h M·2i L FINISH FL.02_41 9EAST ELEVAT ON FACADE D 1_*1EE FLAL £-3/16" = 1-0 ISSUED: 12/09/2016 peop e who listen - des cr 'hat speaks Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE VECTRABANE (VECTRA BANK) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERSSHEARSAOKINSROCKMORE SHEET 10 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN £82/EQLIEAM; .Q./. Wazee Partners. LLC Contact: Tyler Downs 1801 Broadway. Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 720.4201568 Al.glmmi Shears Adkins Rockmore Contact: Patrick Bohler 1550 Wyncoop Street. Suite 100 Denver, CO 80202 303.436.9551 .Lan¤i=unalltiant Stone Landscape Arch,tects Contact: Terry Stone 2100 Brentwood Street Lakewood, CO 80214 303.919.9343 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO W.41:Ave ®OWNERS SIGNATURES Civil Enaineer Kfmley-Horn and Associates. Inc. Contact: Deng Sobieski 4582 South Ulster, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 303.228.2300 BASIS OF BEARING ELEV = 5471.62 (NAVD 88) /lectrical Flainel' Able Consulting Group. LLC Contact: Marcus Vahling 11990 Grant Street Suite 310 N orthglenn, CO 80233 303.325.3271 BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEAR]NGS DERIVED FROM RD< FAST STATIC GPS OBSERVATIONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO COORDiNATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83, 2011), ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23.TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST. ITH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89'3820 WEST. BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREIN. BENCH MARK: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 1 RECOVERED A 0.5· ALUMINUMRODINTHELAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY HALL„ 150· MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29TH AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS EAST OF WADSWORTH BLVD. f i fES ' ie SHEET INDEX: 0 e CD W 41 M Ai SHEET 1 OF 15 COVER SHEET I SHEET 2 OF 16 UTILITY PLAN SHEET 3 OF 16 EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET 4 OF 16 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SHEET 5 OF 16 OVERALL GARAGE PLANS LVL Bl - 02 SHEET 6 OF 16 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET 7 OF 16 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONSR ./ 38#t'e SHEET 8 OF 16 (VECTRABANK) SITE PLANf\E 2 f sHEN ilcfk 1166 3tNE @EK TERR ELEVA S g 0 1 SHEET 11 OF 16 LANDSCAPEPLAN3 WHEATRIDGE 0 I SHEET 12 OF 16 LANDSCAPE NOTES 3 - CONDOS SHEET 14 OF 16 LIGHTING DETAILS SHEET 13 OF 16 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 4 SHEET 15 OF 16 (VECTRA BANK) PHOTOMETRIC PLANSHEET 16 OF 16 (VECTRA BANK) PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING CUT·SHEETS 1 (we), the undersigned, shall comply with all regulations contained in the Wheat Ridge Zoning Code of the City and County of Wheat Ridge. The following signatures constitute all owners of land and structures included in this plan: West End 38,LLC By· Tyler Downs, Owner Date State of Colorado VICINITY MAP - PROJECT SnTE City and County of Wheat RidgeSTATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING: SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMMORE HAS PREPARED THIS SITE SUBM[TTAL FOR WEST END 38. TOTHE N BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, THE PROPOSED SITE DESIGN IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of REQUIREMENTS OF THE MU-C ZONING AND THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS.LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SITE STATISTICS: NOTE: PLEASE REFERENCE PAGES 8 - 10, i EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED LAND USE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PRIMARY STREET (SEE NOTE 14) SIDE STREET (SEE NOTE 14) TOTALAREA LOT #1 LOT #2 LOT#3 FLOOR AREA BY USE RESIDENTIAL RETAIL PARKING DESIGN ELEMENTS BU[LDING HEIGHT (MAX) BUILDING COVERAGE PARKING RESIDENTIAL: 1 SPACE / UNIT (MIN). 2.5 T L RETAIL: 3 SPACES 1 1,000 SQ FT (MIN), 7/1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 2 COMPACTSPACES 10 10 MP TOTAL- BICYCLE (RESIDENTIAL): 1 SPACE 0 10 UNI BICYCLE (RETAIL): 1 SPACE / 20 PARKING PROPOSED USES AND COB NOTE. PLEASE REFERENCE PAGES 8 - 10, P SETBACKS SIDE SETBACK (MIN) REAR SETBACK (MIN) BUILD-TO TOTAL- BIlli).TO PRIMARY STREET (MIN % MIN/MAX) {REFER TOSHEET 4 OF 16) TOTAL BUILD-TO SECONDARY STREET (M WITHIN MIN/MAX) Kimley>)>Horn 4ND 15 - 16 FOR VECTRA BANK SITE INFORMATION. INIT (MAX) .000 SOFT (MAX) & MIN 0< ALLOWED TS SPACES APLIANCE W 4ND 15 -16 FOR VECT , WITHIN IN % SA+R WAZEEPARTNERS SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE MU-CD MIXED USE COMMERCIAL 155 W. 38TH AVE UPHAM ST. [ACRES/SQ FT] GROSS [ACRES/SCO FT] NET 2.873 ACRES/125,166 SQ FT 2.873 ACRES/125,166 SQ FT 0.223 ACRES/9,732 SQ FT 0.223 ACRES/9,732 SQ FT 0.227 ACRES/9,874 SQ FT 0.227 ACRES/9,874 SQ FT 172,856 SQ FT 8,251 SQ FT 51,316 SQ FT REQUIRED PROPOSED 6 STORIES (90')4 STORIES (63') 41,505 GSF REQUIRED PROVIDED 155 (MIN), 388 (MAX)217 SPACES 25 (MIN). 58 (MAX)44 SPACES 5 SPACES (MIN)6 SPACES 26 SPACES (MAX)6 SPACES 261 SPACES 16 SPACES 16 SPACES 2 SPACES 2 SPACES ITH ZONING: RA BANK SITE INFORMATION. REQUIRED PROVIDED 0' 7'-7" 5' 5' REQUIRED PROVIDED 50% WITHIN 52% WITHIN 0'-20'0'-20' 30% WITHIN 89% WEHIN 0'-20'0'-20' PARCEL ONE: THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6™ P.M. EXCEPT THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 85 FEET OF THE EAST 175 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23. AND FURTHER EXCEPTING THAT PORTION AS DEED TO THE CrrY OF WHEAT RIDGE IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 8,1990 AT RECEPTION NO. 90086571. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL TWO. THE NORTH 85 FEET OF THE EAST 175 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER (SW Y. SE V. SW y. SE y.) OF SECTION 23, TOVVISHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 VYEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. PARCELTHREE LOT 1. E.S. ALLEN SUBDIVISION. RECORDED JANUARY 4, 2010 AT RECEPTION NO. 2010000090, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL FOUR (A): A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS· BEGINNING ATA POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 526.40 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER: THENCE NORTHERLY. PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OFSAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 421.15 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.65 FEET. THENCEONAN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 421.15 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE OF 30.00FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LAND CONVEYED TO THE AMERICAN OIL COMPANY ON THE 21 ST DAY OF MARCH. 1972. TO WIT: A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST y OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 526.40 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST 7.: THENCE NORTHERLY. PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST >.. A DISTANCE OF 100.0 FEET, THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 131.79 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS. A DISTANCE OF100.00 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST'A: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE OF 30,00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARAUEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST y.. A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET TO THE PARCEL OF LAND, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE-DESCR]BED LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL FOUR (B) AS FOLLOWS PARCEL FOUR (E): A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 45.00 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER, WHICH POINT IS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 1, PARK AND S HO P S U B DIV 1SION FIRST AMENDMENT THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1. 30.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF 481.40 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1:THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID BLOCK 1, PARALLEL WITH THEWEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF 306.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY. ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND PARALLEL WITH SAID V¥EST LINE, A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET TO AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1 THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1 AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF 131.65 FEET TO AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 MINCTES 37 SECONDS. A DISTANCE OF 115.DO FEET. THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND PARALLEL W[TH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 131.70 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL FIVE THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE SWIM SE1/4 SWIM SE1/4 OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OFTHE GTH P.M., EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR NORTH 38TH AVENUE. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ANGLES NOT INDICATED OTHERWISE ARE EITHER 90 DEGREES OR A SUPPLEMENT OF THE ANGLE DESCRIBED. 2. PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRIVES SHALL BE POSTED WITH "FIRE LANE' SIGNS AS REQUIRED BY THE WHEAT RIDGE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 3. PARKING SPACES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED WITH UPRIGHT SIGNS. 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT REQUIREMENTS. 5. THE SITE SHALL BE LANDSCAPED DURING THE GROWING SEASON OF APRIL 1 ST TO OCTOBER 1ST. 6. AN ACCESS EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES IS HEREBY GRANTED ON AND ACROSS ALL AREAS FOR POLICE, FIRE, MEDICAL AND OTHER EMERGENCY VEHICLES FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. 7. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE IRRIGATED BY A SEPARATE ZONE FROM SOD/GRASS: THIS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS PLANTED IN SOD/GRASS AREAS. 8. BICYCLE PARKING RACKS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS, 9. PRIVATE ROADWAYS ARE NON-DEDICATED STREETS AND WILL NOT 8E MAINTAINED BY THE CITY AND COUNTY OF WHEAT RIDGE. 10.THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMONLY ACCESSED EASEMENT IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS 11.THIS SITE PLAN IS SUBJECT TO A LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THIS DOCUMENT. A.D. 2016 by Wjtness by hand and offical seal My Commission Expires: Not@r¥ Public Address SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE 1, Rob D. Snodgrass, a registered land surveyor in the state of Colorado, do hereby certify that the survey for the West End 38 Site Plan was made under my supervision and the accompanying plan accurately and properly shows said survey. Rob D. Snodgrass, PLS #36580 APPROVALS Approved by For the Zoning Administrator Date Approved by For the Manager of Community Date Planning and Development CLERK AND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATION State of Colorado City and County of Wheat Ridge I hereby certify that this instrument was filed for record in my office at o'clock m,20 Reception # Clerk and Recorder, Ex-Officio Clerk of City and County of Wheat Ridge By: Deputy Fee: ISSUED: 12/09/2016 COVER SHEET SHEET 01 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 1 SS12/8/2016 2:05:21 PC:\Users\jemhoADocuments\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_jemhof.rvt)09TE-Site Plan.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1 11 111. i1%\PROPOSED FIRE] u i -\ 1 DOSING RETAIL- RU=(5428. 491 I|HYE)RANT3 ' \EX STORM AfANHOUE STRIP MALL EX. FIBER PROP. JUNCTION BOX-11"I °NF CUT 36- RCP <E)=34225>)r opnc (TYP)NV N 36- PVC (10=(5420.6)t.... 1 1 329.1'Er Sl/0/*7, -,/4 10 '/ 11 SB9'36'44"W EX. STORM INLET ··SEWER (UP)14 . . r . . -EX. FIRE HYDRANT TO REA¢All·,1 -OF?ATE=(5435.5)PROPERTY LINE - INV OUT 24- RCP (N)= (54 JO.2) INV W 24" RCP (S)=(5430.4)EX. SANITARY MANHOLE Ex ces (npj ILPROPERTY LINEINV IN 11 ROP (NE)=(5430.41 RIM=(5436.0) EX SANITARY MANHOLE DETENTION VAULT PROPOSED INV OUT 8 PVC (NE)=(5427.4) . .. 3 E RIM=(54359) \_PROPOSED 10INV IN 8' PVC (SW)=<5427.6) 5<-'' Et: 3700.1/NET ble ..1,1 10*4-RIM=(5435.6) .1 1 - EX SANCTARY. INV OUT 18' REP-(5431.0) . -'%O 1 .1 1 1 1 . IZ ,F SEWER (TYP)- Tm K ' STORM SEWER TO BE ROUTED 1, 11 EX. 8' I Ra«937.621 EX. SANITARY VANHOLE (009 r TO UNDERGROUND DETENTION b 11 INV OUT 12- VCP (N)=(5422.7)LA £*30-«11(-JA.* -1 09- » {.3 /IN¥ IN 12" VCP (S)=(54235) VAULT; RE: MEP PLANS F 11 -- -- INY IN E PVC (E)-(5424.8)STOW (7>191 1 '265-,-1--U.4- , - PROPOSED V WV N 6 LP (W)=(542.3.3)\ ·=1.0.:mf-.1 UNDERGROUND / 11m-,/F POWER PROP. 3" DOMESDC89·38'20"E -M-29*. El BRE HYDRANT --7 99*. STORN.131.8'7*XER O 4| ' or '/ SERVICE FROM 2" METER *< TO REMATN /MANHOLE (TYP)4EITRY ROOM -1 i :10 .991 PROP. 5 CooTj --tA '4 - * TYPE-R INLET A =L 1PROP. 6 ARE SERVICEEX. 24 STORM *P) J 'D . herl · 0 ROPOSED ROW 11\- t-- 1 5013'04=E POOL AREA DESIGNED BY .1 LANDSCAPE: RE h r- 400.4 I I MEP/LANDSCAPE PLANS -„ Err !L El: AIR-b2 i i OPFC rTe11 4 f n n n || %11 Lrl_L' 1! LAJ-7/1 1,EX. oun-Er smuc,Ver , STORM-j n (TYP)/t/VOU/-24'Ep<N)ikfiflf I- *RipER.-i-I-=V-I-1-r--Ti]PROP. 8" NYLOPLAST 1- k || ph PAU -1-1) 1 0--L-4--Ji-Ji.. /£-1 A-*,,A J lilli-RELOCATE . ,EX. GAS [TYP) f Nv m; ta- RCP (W)=(5436.0) F944.-AN-J COMCAST PEDESTAL 1 TYPE-R INLET INLINE DRAIN WITH¢11 lf;':' ·1 1 EC I#$17£)911 0 1 9-1 STANDARD GRATE 11 --FU i I /-,iu,v me1 1 31LEI_ -1 11-[iRELa=k |I - r<W'31f-PROP. GASPROP. STORM ... TMANHOLE (TYP) EX. STORM PIPE _j 2·· ...25' ; / L -INV ta- PVC=(5435.1)PROPOSED AREJ ROOF DRAIN 7 MAIN (TYP)PROP. 6"_/PROP. 6-1 itullHYDRANT58938'20"W PROP. STORM (TYP)ROOF DRAIN 2 EK WATER 131.9'7 PROP. CDOTi < - i - _ 32.6&_ LJO j :TYPE 13 INLET 9 1 <41... 1 1 SNADZEY 645 6 1 LPRop. 2" DOMESTIC WATERSTA NON AND ' T i · 2 1 I SERVICE FROM 1.5" METER69/Vt,7•E?Va- Sm,if- . - EK .4 1 / 80.0' r€ -. N072'07"W PROP. FIA JI.,d«HYDRANT f,y • XCEL TRANSFORMER •t.4',2-11 11 O PROP. CA TO BEE RELOCATED . .1. U 9f \ \ PROP. 3000 CAL -7 COMCAST PEDESTAL -I l -EX. STREET LIGHTGREASEINTERCEPTOR•-TO BE RELOCATED +IL --1' . PROPOSED ROW n 1 L ..1 FIRE h- i RE: MEP PLANS TO REMAINEX. STORM INLET.S: L - 4/6 - '19·38'ZOL_TO BE REPLACED EX. ARE HYDRANT e L PROF. 4" F-le - 293.7'GRATE O FL=(5437.3) TO REMAW' J EX. SANITARY WANHOLE _1 . _ SANITARY ,- RIM=(54415)-/f- Ex. GAS (TYP) -- .4 EX DOMESnC-- - PROP. POWER AND-1 -- \ |5/ INV OUT 17 VOP (E)=(54312) -,1 . [4 - W 3877/ A ENUE 3 25 rn')3 TRANSFORMER -EX. nBER OPI,C (TYP), :·-._ ctZ ·- WATER UNE'05,5455**# i ii Er. .5?Z731, 464/1,HUE - ·- |_| | PROP. 4'RIM-(5442.9) | SANITARY __PROP. 1" DOMESTIC . _I I..+ ' VINv a/r 48"Rao CE)=(3434,9) ·„ -----··· EI 48' 5/mv (77;9-=j„„,-- '- ' EX. 48' sTORA, (Typ) --" WAN 1 -INV 04 48- REP 05=(54-35.0 EX. SANiTARY NANHOLE my=(544(11)Filillim.mimm"Imiltrlill'Ill NV OUT 12' VCP (E)=(5430.6)I...,%/1* g23%%MANHOLE EX. 12- STORM (TYP)··7- EX- 12* SIORM (Typ) _ _ - -_.. ....._- --NV IN !2- VCP (¥945430.6) '.. -LINV OUT 12 VCP 04)=(5429.1}9,·.. INV IN 12 VIP (W)=(5429.2)·-_EX. 12" SAN/LARy mu=(5439.1) 1 GRAZE * FL-(5437.1) _ ·>-···-------' - INV IN 8" VCP (E)=(5429.3)INV IN r VCP (S)=(5431.5) EX- STORM MANHOLE\EX. STORM WLET I 'f if.-1 -de,;c SECR (TYP)tNV OUT 48' IMP (E)=(5433.5)iNV OUT 1r RCP 00=(5434.0)0 INV IN « PVC (W)=(5433.6}Mv #,1 12 PVC (S)=(5434.5)3EkKimley»>Horn 0 SA+R WAZEEDAR-NERSSPEARIACKINGROCKMORE i i- 111 1 PROPOSED_L=11 1 \NSFORMER 1111E11 J f E- PROP. / lili CTrl lu 0 1 1 111 .. -lili 9 (Tlp, f GENERAL NOTES 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DEMOLITION OF EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDING REMOVAL OF ANY EXISTING UTiUnES SERVING THE STRUCTURE. UTILITIES ARE TO BE REMOVED TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING Un LITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTIUTY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXIS n NG U TI U 11 E S WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 3. WATER LINES ARE ASSUMED TO HAVE 4.5' OFF COVER AT CROSSNGS. 4, ALL EXISTING DRY UTILITIES HAVE BEEN ASSUMED TO BE 3' DEEP AT CROSSING LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS. 5. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY DEPTH AND LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILInES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCPON AND SHALL- NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY CONFLICTS. 6. EXISTING PIPES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS. 7. ALL STORM PIPE ENTERING STRUCTURES SHALL BE GROUTED TO ASSURE CONNECTION AT STRUCTURE IS WATERTIGHT. 8. ALL STORM SEWER MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, AND SHALL HAVE TRAFFIC BEARING RING & COVERS. UDS SHALL BE LABELED =STORM SEWER 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 10. ALL STORM STRUCTURES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH UNIFORM POURED MORTAR INVERT FROM INVERT IN TO INVERT OUT. 11. CONTRACTOR TO FLUSH AND VACUUM ENTIRE ON-SITE STORMWATER SYSTEM UPONI COMPLETION OF PROPOSED WORK. 12. ALL PVC TO BE SDR-35. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM RD< FAST STATC GPS OBSERVATIONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83. 2011), ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89·38'20" WEST, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREIN. BENCHMARK: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 1 RECOVERED A 0.5= ALUMINUM ROD IN THE LAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY HALL. 150' MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29TH AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS EAST OF WAOSWORTH BLVD. ELEVATION = 5471.62 (NAVD 88) £ NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 30 60 ISSUED: 12/09/2016 UTILITY PLAN SHEET 2 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 4:24:01 PM K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WesfEnd38\CADD\Construction\Site Plan\096331009UT.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO It,3 4 LEGEND FuMITS oF CONSTRUCTION - 16 I 1 c cr 0 CF .®. N89'38'44"E *ss: 304.1'7 cF or cr -PFOPE-RTY LINE 0- lilli 1 JL '' PROPOSED CONTOURSXX EXISTING CONTOURS _ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/ CONSTRUCnON VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROL .. 1 Op)032@ INLET PROTECTIONLIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONn I | FFE=5441.00 |11 D i-37 3 nJ n LAJ \ 1 FFE=5430.331 (SCA =--m=SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG . N89 38'20=E 1 131·t - -36.11 i/ D \ 0<1 N t GATE -p NO·12'07"W 114.3'7 -/, 41 -PROPERTY UNE 43 r 2 1 1 8--I. FE-5438.33|k 4-- 1 LifTE; Ne- --m N 1-le - SILI FENCE CONSTRUCTION FENCE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA STABILIZED STAGING AREA -FE==5438,3 SF- 0-- Sol STREET SWEEPING Urj: 1 , 1 *THE CONTRACTOR MAY USE ROCK SOCKS, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS, SILT FENCE OR DANDY RECYCLER BAGS FOR PERIMETER AND INTERNAL CONTROLS BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS THIS CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DOWNSTREAM END OF- STREETS USED FOR MATERIAL STORATE OR HANDUNG, AND AT ALL DRIVEWAY CUTS FOR SITE[ ACCESS. / 10-1 1 5441.00 lcd €013'04 r -ill... h 10 j:hi -irr-V'-T -V-T-VMT -1.-7-7-1 r - -T -- '7: lilli 1 11 1 |FFE-5441.00| 15441-00] 1 1 1 11 1 1*26 1 -| < ,PROPOSED R1 11 1 1 39.89 FL 7HP |FFE L-4 r 41.00 39.36FL -1 39.87ll U 38.37 - 4 1 400. It _ , FFE=5438,33 421 n n 4 & fl 1 IT«- r - ..0 |1 & UMITS OF CONSTRUCnON GENERAL NOTES 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ADJACENT STREETS/DRIVES TO BE FREE OF SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS. STEET SWEEPING SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON AN INTERMITTENT BASIS AS NEEDED TO CONTROL SEDIMENT OR AS REQUIRED BY THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. AT A MINIMUM, STREET SWEEPING SHALL TAKE PLACE ON A DAILY BASIS UPON COMPLETION OF THAT DAY'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. REFER TO THE UTIUTY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTIUTIES STABILIZED STAGING AREA AND CONCRETE WA5HOUT AREA SHALL BE RELOCATED WITH ALL REQUIRED SMPS TO A DESIGNATED OFF-5ITE LOCATION WHICH V¢ILL BE DETERMINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. „.I„-,7 1-·FL lilli.i 2 3 y 1: 0.1 --1 ir·,'M-- L 4 38.f # 3'1 9 3 - - 431, (CA 'b - - 1 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS -1 .1 BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM R Il< FAST STATIC GPS OBSERVATIONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO39- - COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83, 2011), ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 339.44 LF-1 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6-TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89-38'20" WEST. BETWEEN THE MON UMENT5 SHOWN HEREI N. 1; 1 fr- 1 32 4 11, 11-BENCHMARK:PROPERTY UNE ·· · 1 CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 1589'38'20-W RECOVERED A 0.5» ALUMINUM ROD IN THE LAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY 1 131 9'.4 HALL, 150' MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29™ AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESSN012'07W -III \fl__ .i _ 11 EAST OF WADSWORTH BLVD. 39.19 M |P Fill,- 1 ELEVATION = 5471.62 (NAVD 88)|| | ' | FFE-5439.0039.75 Fl FFE=5438.381 _ »r 1IU/-39-52 FL 5440.50 1 40.37 FL-- " 1-1 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION-7 f 2911.-9=9 - f * 11[=4 \»41 \I PROPOSED ROW-/i19 r c.,L-7 + Ip)--11 -11- \UZZ31/1/8 E @i)LN89'38'20-E 1 293.7 ., CI-J IIll V 11 £ ./r ' 1 NORTH / LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION-' r- W JETH A VENUE - GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 60, 0 1 Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE lf'EARS.D.N. ROCK'ORE PARTNERS ISSUED: 12/09/2016 EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET 3 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 3:51:57 PM K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\CADD\Construction\Site Plan\096331009EC_GD.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SECURE PARKING GATE BELOW @ LVL Bl LVL.. PARKN I IKE :TORA r 10'-1 '--- 1 1777+*04#NA, ti .-A SECURE PARK]NG GATE AT LEVEL 1 -A ' t LVL 1 P-Nri BRIDGE ABOVE @ LEVEL 2. 14'-5 CLEARANCE BENEATH THE BRIDGE (MIN. REQ. PER FDACCESS) - 7/// .///////// 11 IZIZE» TRANSFORMER RESIDENTIAL TRASH ENCLOSURE. CMU STRUCTURAL WALL WITH BRICKVENEERAND PRECAST CAP WITH OPAQUE STEEL ACCESS DOORS ACCri-DJ I F.I 1 F-Rt INC, 42-5 E li 1 ../-1 4= -·t 1 9 -1I lilli - .2 -76£ ==462 t 13018 2%_14/.lt--ft«11 - , POOL - 171+ 3 N'34,1 [L.'iNJu -;f ATE COURTYARD '1 :I 1 E.:g .«.1 6, C \ 30· WATER i,. 1- ·-'-••. 18·:0'-295#''C,$ --147 1 1-'1*1 [ @ W,T. bl 1-' r L -_INGRESS/EGRESS -3 T ° I·-1 1.1 N -„-1EASEMENT .NI APERREC. NO. F0134554 ''l-30 1 I TreF-h ,./.'.2 2 -A 1 A.ga·6 BRIDGEABOVE@ LEVELS, 2-4 TYPICAL PARK]NG SPACE - TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE .1-1 + .1.« =137777 LOXAGE PARKING SPACE I ll..L hr IA LNMA */U'. TA ...CEPmeN 3111- - 2-4-1 A- Ce: ArhESB L. L- u Uf I TRANSFORMER 1,34 \ AF--11 x. INTERIOR TRASH4% ki- ·6.i··/1 ··*- TERMINATION ROOM 1. 30'01 1 Lries, CAIIOF, ap,JvE ----1 // 30'-0· INGRESS/EGRESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER REC. NO. F0156207 El E&-3 AETNL1 VECTRA BANK Sn-E. 4 PLEASE REFERENCE PAGES 8,9&1R. It-3 .-,9, f RETAIL CANOPY ABOVE 1 W IETAA 2 171/ 38TH AVE (PRIMARY) R.O.W. 30'-0" (VARIES) RETAIL CANOPY ABOVE SITE PLAN r = 30--00' ISSUED: 12/09/2016Kimley»>Horn SA+ R WAZE E ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN PARTNERS SHEET 04 OF 16SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 2:05·22 PCAUsers\jemhof\Documents\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_lemhof.rvt]09TE-Site plan.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE S]XTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 11111!11111illillilll lillim EleSTCW.CE LAVAi#Mti i mit,t 43 RESIDENTIAL PARKING STALLS 19 VISITOR PARKING STALLS DRIVE ENTRY 0 88 PARKING STALLS O - A- 4 E=-P.T.R ! 400'-04P MATEAe,TH, ..7 l i l i I 0 2 18.4 6.5% 00 -9 £ dA. 1466 4 1 ·Ur-re - --- TYP. ACCESSIBLE' '=--- PARKING STALL6.5% 1 I ' ' 1 ' H I I\ I 1-------1 BRIDGE ABOVE @ LVL 2149 CLEARANCE -Illill - ACCESS TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGI LVL Bl PARKING LVL 1 PARKING 1 =20-01. r 1 '=20'-0 m . Il i lli l llI l lil l Int--1-11----illIlll P *1 1 JI u 1 111 1 1 11.-t--4.......lu 1 1 11 u L 3.3% 86 PARKING STALLS *110-8" 6.5% 4 16®.- 5..'ll ...i 1 LVL 2 BRIDGE ACCESS TO RESIDENTIAL BUILDING LIlli ' 1:-1:L. 11 I / Il, 1 I LVL 2 PARKING 1 = 20'-0Kimley»>Horn SA+ R WAZEliPARTNERS SHEARS ADKINSROCK.MORE ISSUED: 12/09/2016 OVERALL GARAGE PLANS SHEET 05 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 2:05:24 PCAUsers\jemhof\Documents\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_jemhof.rvt)09TB-Site Plan.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY SOUTH RETAIL (NON-RESIDENTIAL) FACADE EAST RETAIL (NON.RESIDENTIAL) FACADE 33'-4'9'-8" PREFINISHED METAL SIDING REQUIRED 60%MIN/317 SQFTMIN 30% MIN / 197 SQ FT MIN PROPOSED 79% 1 417 SQ FT 649. / 421 SO FT 172'-8' MATERtAL SCHEDULE MASONRY VENEER (1) MASONRY VENEER {2) FIBER CEMENT SIDING PREFINISHED METAL. SIDING WINDOW MULLIONS COMMENTS RED TEXTURED RED LIGHT GREY DARK GREY DARK BRONZE 108'-0 FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIr)ING - PREFINISHED METAL SIDING FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING 2 / - MASONRY VENEER (1) MASONRY VENEER (1) - F PREFINISHED METAL GUARDRAILPREFINISHED METAL GUARDRAIL n \ 1 PARAPET- 1 /ai¥-, 9FT iTI-111 1, 1 Mt-lit / rTErgffq'IM -_ ROOF 150-0 LEVELI I 138*.8" 4/ 1UU .LEVEL 3 I 1274 iT I LEVEL/ ,1 1165·-0 b MASONRY VENEER (2) - - PRECAST CONCRETE PLANTER - MASONRY VENEER (2) OVERALL SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" =14-0 89'-8'23'-9"272'-8 PREFINISHED METAL SIDING PREFIN[SHED METAL GUARDRAIL (BRIDGE) PREFINISHED METAL- SIDING -FIBER CEMENT HOR]ZONTAL SIDING PREFINISHED METAL GUARDRAL - PREFINISHED METAL. SIDING MASONRY VENEER (1) n FIBER CEME Etc m m ® cm Elm11 e. fl t 1 NT HORIZONTAL SIDING _ _ ROOF 150 0. _ LEVEL 4 138'-8" LEVEL 3 8 127-4- 1 LEVEL 2 *Fl 116'.0/ L. LEVELl 100·-0- LEVEL Bl 89·4 f - MASONRY VENEER (2) CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOP -CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE PLANTER ENTRY INTO GARAGE - MASONRY VENEER (2) OVERALL EAST ELEVATION 1/16'- =14 ISSUED: 12/09/2016Kimley»>Horn SA+ R WAZE E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERS SHEET 06 OF 16SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 2:05:26 PC:\Users\jemhof\Documents\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017-jemhof.rvt]09TB-Site Plan.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO MASONRY ENCLOSURE Iped#i-'i-=1=t METAL PANEL GATE - - 5-- MATERIAL- SCHEDULE MASONRY VENEER (1) MASONRY VENEER (2) FIBER CEMENT SIDING PREFINISHED METAL SIDING WINDOW MULLIONS RED TEXTURED RED LIGHT GREY DARK GREY DARK BRONZE COMMENTS Ir i = ...3 12£ VARIES TYPICAL TRASH ENCLOSURE 1/4 '=1'-0 104'-7 131'-5 23J-9 89 -8" EXTEND OF GARAGE BRIDGE BEYOND PORTION OF BUILDING BEYOND FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING -PREFABRICATED METAL GUARDRAIL -MASONRY VENEER (1) - PREFABRICATED METAL SIDING - PREFABRICATED METAL SIDING BUILDING BEYOND - _IMZLER'iii 1.11 PARAPET £3 15*'-6" ' ROOF E150-0- 1 LEVELI 138-8 LEVEL 3 __ 127·-4* LEVEL 2 £ 116·-0- 1 LEVEL 1 L i 100·-Or ./ LEVEL Bl 89'·4· CONCRETE BARRIER (3·-0· MIN HT.) MASONRY VENEER (2)\L CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE STOOF SCREEN WALL PREFABRICATED METAL MESH SCREEN -MASONRY VENEER (2) OVERALL WEST ELEVATION 1/16 =1'4 233'-3' EXTENTS OF GARAGE BUILDING BEYOND '!In'71""TE.-1 1 XM*1 - FIBER CEMENT HORIZONTAL SIDING - -CONCRETE BARRIER (3·-0 MIN HT.) - --41- 0__ELL - --_------- 7 --------OPEN TO GARAGE MARVER(2 E[I E 11" E -1-1 -111 51 lilli lili .111111 1111 t 11111111111lili : - PARAPET <4 150'-0- 1fj- u -2 -_ 1 - z LEVE!.4 LEVEL 3 /1-, LEVEL 2 *I)--. . . . - 71ee-, 1,1.111 1 11 11 -1111 4 CO LEVEL 1 L 100'2 LEVEL 81 E 1 894 0 - PREFABRICATED METAL MESH SCREEN L CONCRETE BARRIER (3.0 MIN HT.) OVERALL NORTH GARAGE ELEVATION 1,16 =1'-0 ISSUED: 12/09/2016Kimley»>Horn SA+ R WAZE E EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERS SHEET 07 OF 16SHEARS ADKINSROCK MORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 2:05:28 PC:\Users\jemhof\Documents\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_Jemhof.rvt)09TS-Site Plan.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SINGLE UNIT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE - RE: ELEVATIONS PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE - A2-1 V 9 A 1\2- 4 - WALL LUMINAIRE 4" BOLLARDS, TYP. 7 / T 1 . NEW 2 STORY BRANCH BANK WITH DRIVE-THRU 1'- I 18'.07 ,22'-0' | 1 L. r-- (N)POLE MOUNTED9 1 01 60 11-RE: ELECTRICAL/ LIGHT FIXTURE + 10-4. .il 10' - 6- 17 --0OUTLINE OFCANOPY T A A3-1 1 SITE PLAN 1 1"=10-0" THIS SITE PLAN IS PRESENTED IN SUPPORT OF VECTRA BANKS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION. FULL WEST END 38 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION IS PRESENTED UNDER SEPARATE SUBMITTAL. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE MEASURED FROM EXTERIOR FACE OF STRUCTURE LEVEL 1 2349 SF LEVEL 2: 2318 SF ISSUED: 12/09/2016 (VECTRA BANK) SITE PLANCSHGA Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE PARTNERS ECTRARANK®SHEET 8 OF 16peop e who bsten - des gn thal speaks SHEARSAD/INSROCKMORE .1-/COLORADO WEST END 38 SITE PLAN WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO -MATERIAL SCHEDULE T.0.-fEAIURE WALL 11 NO. NAME COMMENTS SIGN BY OTHERS 3 3-1 BRICKVENER«22222222it****222222LIEJUIJILIEIJ 42 SQFT +A f©1 ST-1 HARD COAT STUCCO LIGHT GREY T.O. HIGH PABAEET [*ELE*®PARELCOLORCONSISTENTWITHWESTEND38REDBRICK T.O. LOY, PARAaI_*1 M-3 METAL COPING DARK GREY129· - 0· 4 1LUCOLO WAX,O M-2 (N) WALL MOUNTED REQUIRED i PROPOSED FIXTURE SECQNUE]:928 arh EAST - FACADE AT.O. CANOPY h SECONDARY MATERIAL- _,*(JANEL_41 0 S-1 S.1 4" STEEL BOLLARDS, CONC. FILLED (TYP) _EINISH FLOQI 1 NORTH ELEVAT ON - FACADE A \YY-SLIEPLAN 3/16" 1' 0 faut oft I.O. FEATUREY¢ALL 4 SIGN BY OWNER SIGN BY 42 SQFT - OWNER Ma _12=BIGH PARAPET 42 SQFT +A T.O. LO\1 4882EL-t\- 0 OLOIADO FINISH.FLOQRZ, M \UITE PLAN 3 S-1 QTRASH ENCLOSURE FRONT ELEVATION U 3/16" = 1'-0 SECOND FLOOR h M.1 T OgANQEY E 8.0. CANOPY-_6 £-t PE _Eth!!aH FLOQR th 9WEST ELEVATION FACADE B A TRASH ENCLOSURE SIDE ELEVATION ISSUED: 12/09/2016 m,»--Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE (VECTRA BANK) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PARTNERS.ECTRARANKSHEARS ADKINS ROCK.MORE 1JCOLOIAD6 SHEET 9 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO NAME COMMENTS S-1 ---iRER-VENEER -DARKGREY -T.O. FEATURE WALL h HARD COAT STUCCO LIGHT GREY M-3 Mi__£ METAL PANEL COLOR CONSISTENT WITH WEST END 38 RED BRICK M2 WINDOW MULLIONS BLACK T.CUi!21-FARAPET S.1 ST- S-1 REQUIRED PROPOSED NORTH - FACADE A O. CANOPY SECONDARY MATERIAL- 113·-0 METAL PANEL - FACADE C 1 30% MAX I 08% SECOND FLOOR /1 113' 0 8.0. CANOPY 109' 6 £€3 0M·3 5-1 FINISH FLOOR |h 1 SOUTH ELEVATION - FACADE C 3 i["prvt W SITE PLAN 99 6 3/16" =1'-0 SIGN BY OWNER 2 SQFT +A TO. FEAIPIWIU_41 135'-Or 4/ T.Qdi12-FARAPET h J,fM T.O. LOW PARAPEI *21 S-1 M·3 L _SECOND FLOOR _ _ 113'3 VESTIBULE HEIGHT 111'-4 gr M-2 M-2 tl _EININH FLOQB_41 9EAST ELEVATION FACADE D £-3/16= 1-0 ISSUED: 12/09/2016 Ki ey»>Horn SA+R WAZEE VECTRARANK®(VECTRA BANK) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS peop e who 'isten - des ge that sceaks PARTNERSSHEARS AOKINS ROCK.MORE 1-./COLORADO SHEET 10 OF 16 fs WEST END 38 SITE PLAN WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1..010 '-11.-\ 1 - - -2-2-- 4 -111.---1- -11 Uj---1----1-31 1:21.1 rv-1 FYI MATCHLINE r /1 11= 1 -£ 2 1- - ilte '4 POO! 1 If 11I 11 IULCd lRAISED PLANTER TYP jj FL F oil 4 3% 1 'kni= =1 0 L-m„1111,1111'T-T .- - 1 4 12 --5 5 i,--.=rl_._Ir...2.6--3 pi@GU.=re. # =:RAISED PLANIER. L TYR 1 _1 1 CONCRETE CURB |' /»LANTER EDGE TYP CONCRETE SEAT WALL. TYP. 1 42<12 U 11 111 5 11 LU E STAIR W/SIADIUM= | TRANSFORMER |*I'I| I , 4SEATIN(i\.4*J •IM:?1 IU4 . 1 1 E SPECIAL PAYING, TYP. -----3--- Vir .li[\ 14 1.-6 -Ii .0. -Ii M.I.=- - 4.- 2 114.2 27=Uft>-7- CONCRETE 1\ .5' SCREENING 1 PAVEMENT. TYP. I ,-BIKE RACK, TYR : /FENCE -I I. 1 ... 1% r 12 -1'·SCREENING F FENCE ' L L_ F-i"I E-AX 1 #41-- BIKE RACK, TYP L - J EXISTING HONEYLOCUST 3 -< p POTENTIAL ECIALPAVING. TYP.CONCFETE CURBREES TO BE PRESERVEDA 11. 1 i i-O. ·.1 1 1 _CONCRETE PLANTER EDGE. TYP. -U / L 7- 11 ' CONCRETE SEAT WALL. TYP.1/033AlSTREET LIGHT, TYP> 1 4 1 BIKE RACK. TYP...1 -1 1 NEL LSTREET LIGHT, TYR PED. LIGHT, TYP 1 e 1 WEST 38TH AVENUE 1.- ...........-............... ISSUED: 12/09/2016 FAMapt 0 20' 40' 60' LANDSCAPE PLANKimley»>Horn SA+R WUEE XHI i/mmEEr ARCHITECTS SHEARIA'KINSROCKMORE PAR-NERS 303·99·9343 SCALE: 1" = 20'-0'SHEET 11 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN N f 3,\ 11 11 12/8/2016 4:00:17 PM /Use,5/hlonelll/Desktop/Stone LA/SLA Projects/160538th and Upham/CAD/Sheets/SD-Site Plan.A+/Al 1 .-In'Ir™nr, 011- .,in-1 / PAVEMINT TYP WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN SITE DATATABLE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO /i Sk NOIE DONOTN-TANIPUTM™ROO.ULNOT N CONFOANCE .™ COLORADO 'UnSERY ACT REQUIR™ENTS *IMULC,1... 1-0.OW &·......w,NG CRSE.VALK <PRLNEAUD-EORDEADWOODAFTEHPLANn•13**cH,0 -SETD.0-ICON™NER OR GR.!IN IN NURSERY SET me ©F AINPERS *ALLYOFINISHOR•,DEOFMULCH e.CRCUNGROOTS 1,* 5EESFECIFCATIC»IS EOR CO-OSITION UND,Sn.RBED.. POTENTIAL PLANT PALETTE SYMBOL ABBRV, OTY BOTANICAL Acer tataricum 'GarAnn' Cercis canadensis Celtis occidentalis Juniperus chmnensis 'Hetzi, Columnaris Betula nigra 'Cully Quercus muehlenbergii Quercus robur Syringa reticulata TREES COMMON Hot Wings Maple Eastern Redbud nrestern Hackberry Green Column Juniper Hentage River Birch Chinkapin Oak Engiish Oak Japanese Tree Lilac SIZE 7 Cal 8&8 (tree form) Bi Multi-stem (Clump) 2 Cal 6&8 #15 pot 10-12' Multi-stem (Clump) 2 Cal B&8 2 Cal B&B r Cal B&83 {tree form) Open Space/Landscaping Useable Sod Hardscape On-site trees On-site shrubs Street trees Required* 10% Min. / 14,477 SF 7.5% Min. / 10,858 SF 6% Max. / 8,686 SF % Max. / SF 15 (1 per 1000 SF) 145 (10 per 1000 SF) 23 (1 per 30 LF) Proposed* 20.8% / 30,155 SF 13.8% / 20,048 SF 2.2% / 3,154 SF 11.7% / 16,894 SF 37.000000 -10,107 SF 19.000000 BAiL Cll • 12· SHRUB PLANTING %/ ./ GOLE /05*h CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE L-A01 SHRUB DEPT. OF PUBLIC WORKS SHRUB PLANTINGENGINEER[NG DIVISION -Lr SHRUBS & ORN. GRASSES Amelanchier alnifolia 'Regent Comus alba ·Regnzam Hydrangea art)orescens 'Annabelle· Hydrangea arborescens 'Abetwo M iscanthus si n ens s 'Morning Light· Pennisetum alopecuroides 'Ljttle Bunny' Pinus mugo 'White Bud' Rosa'RADcon Taxus x media Tauntcnii' DETAIL CoDE Thula occidentalis 'Degroors Spire PERENNIALS & VINES . . . . . . Astilte x japonica 'Deutchland' Campsis radicans 'Flava Hosta 'Golden Tara' Iris sibenca 'Butter and Sugar Vinca minor 'Bowles' OTHER SOD Low.Water Demand Blend: Regent Servicebefry #5 Pot Red Gnome Dogwood #5 pot Annabelle Hydrangea #5 pot Incrediball Hydrangea #5 pot Morning Light Maiden Grass #1 Pot Little Bunny Fountain Grass #1 Pot White Bud Mugo Pine #6 pot Pink Knock Out Rose #5 pot Taunton Yew #5 pot Degrocrs Spire Arbom,tae #15 pot White Astilbe #1 pot Yellow Trumpet Vine #5 pot Golden Tiara Hosta #1 pot Butter & Sugar Siberian Iris #1 pot Vincia Minor Flat * Calculations are based on improvements within site boundaries: they do not include improvements within ROW - Shrub quantity to be determined for the next submittal NOTES 1. Soil Amendments: Prior to planting, all planting areas shall incorporate soil amendments at a rate of 3 cubic yards per 1000 SF to a minimum depth of 6". A lesser amount shall be provided if a soil test shows that 2 cubic yards per 1000 SF is not necessary for water retention and deep rooting of plant materials. 2. Irrigation: The plan shall include (1) A rain sensor with automatic shut-off of the system during periods of high moisture; (2) A drip, sub-surface, bubbler or low volume irrigation system for all planting strips less than 8' wide and all planting beds involving trees, shrubs perennials and groundcover; and (33) an irrigation clock which allows programming to meet the differential needs of the specified planting plan. 3. Landscape Maintenance. All plants shall be maintained continually in a healthy condition in accordance with generally accepted professional horticultural standards and practices. Plants that die or are unhealthy shall be replaced. Regular pruning and trimming shall apply to maintain health and an attractive appearance and to permit the plants to achieve their intended height. Landscape areas shall remain free of weeds, litter, junk, rubbish and other nuisances and obstructions, The vegetation shall be covered with wood mulch or decorative rock to provide a clean, uniform appearance. -N?,220&32*#%26'.50&*MA'Aits 14 GUAGE GAL' .* WT 1/2-0 X 10 WHME PVC APEON EACM RE 20% Hard Fescue. 2090 Chewing Fescue. 20yo Creeping Red Fescue, 15% Newport Kentucky Bluegrass, 15% Penguin Perennial Bluegrass, 10% Bluestar Kentucky Bluegrass -SPECIED™EESTFW'COL [X}NOT TWT -SPECIf/%57S. 2.Ht AUGkASAPPROVED KEEPPLUMBHTOPSEVEN DRIvE,2-iN-OUasTUEDSUSOMCErsOE .ANnNOPITTRIE..........SIDE:ATE,eN.....0/ TREESGREATER™3-CAL USEGU¥SASPERERGREEN,REES W,GWHE' SPEC...FER .0 SPECTFICATNS SECURE I TOPWi™ QUCT TAPE ...IP:qi/Elrv.5.:....AP.&2. Cl 'OIL SETTRUI.UMB E *c•£/ BACXFILL **ENTS AS SPECED . TOP 12- tu'l=·1=11* 0- 1=I I E . -,•1161_ ;'./. Al IMNE ./.RE F.OM U/.1.1- 1/1,0/E WIRE ./SKETS 7-T-77«ZIi.,w, .IZEIG @ACKFU -P™. CO-*ClED·-UNOG,URBED™TOOTTOM'CAHOCTU.LMAl _ _ Bu ULA •2•. | 1 L 17!Elll-1.1- i 41 1 1 I DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING ZA·:· t..lf 3' 6 'NOTreg=Al - .;-' l . & CM ®ed CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE L-801 TREE DEPT OF PUBLIC WORKS DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING ENGINEERING DIVISION . OETAI CODE L flui. 1 lIli t 1 -11 W , 1--10 . 1.- .4 fi 3 M / TRANSFORMER-1 -, 1-4- - 1 1IF JI 1 h - ./1 --pgal Up=3@Wrill-/ i| i n. ·/1 i. ki ;1 -FI | | 21\ \1* 1 7- IC- ,MAT¢HLIAE | | | i fr- 20 Kimley»>Horn SA+R SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE WAZEE DARTNERS CSH€AA NET=im= 1COLORADO STONE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 303.919·9343 01 20'40'60' C SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" ISSUED: 12/09/2016 LANDSCAPE NOTES SHEET 12 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN I 2/8/2016 4:00:17 PM /Users/tstonelli/Desktop/Stone LA/SLA Projects/1605 38th and Upham/CAD/Sheets/SD-Site Planentini I./Ill/r.// Pirn, I... WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO /-ZONE LOT LINE Lumina-Schedul 1 11 1 1 1 1/ Symbol Lab,1 MnufBcturer Cataloglumber D,SC,iptlon Lamp MEGAMAN LEOR.ectorseries LR1305-60.'I/53T00K GX53 Numblr Lum•ns Per Lmp•Lrnp 1 305,03 W..9/ UPPER PARKING AREA CALCULATION ZONE. - 0.0 '0.00.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 *0.0 '0.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 '0.0 *0.0 9.0 0.0 '0.0 9.0 *0.0 0.0 '0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0» 0·0 *0.6 '.7 ).8 0.9 i 0.1.0 +0.9 '0 'of '1.0 '1.0 '1.0 0.90.8 '0.9 '11 'lf .0.9 .0.8 *0.7 '0.6 | 0.5 0.3i.1 11.3 1.5 1.81 1.91.8 77 '118 -1.9 1.9 .1.91.BIN.7 '1.8 9. *1.b *1.8 *1.6 *1.3 '1.1 1.0.9 O.z SEOE GE URA-40551-W40 Rad/3.-Ile. loclon'Ight 3*3 LED 4000K 78.95008 15.9 0.0 0.0 .0.0 0.0 00 1.4 '17 '2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 -2.5 2.52.4 '2.5 '2.4 '2.5 '2.5 '2.5 *2.4 '2,4 '2.4 '22 '1.8 '1.5 92 '0.9 0-1 E 490.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.3 -3.3 3.3 3.3 -3.5 3.5 32 '3.3 '3.2 '3.5 *3,5 '3.3 9.3 13 '3.2 12 3.0 *4.1 .; 52 k 4.4 *5.1 r F&,0.49 ¢I CALCULATION THIS N.9 ' ki 35.8 p #03/075-AREAISTHE . / *0.1 +2 9 -4 0 -6 8 N 1 v '4.4 '51 -5.3 -5.3 i.9-43 •.8 .5.2:15.4 5.1 4,4 4.4 -5.0 2.9GROUND LEVEEGARAGEf,TRY, --·..3JEG.9 9.2 '12 *13 '32 *3.4 ts *3.2 9.3 '3.2 *3.4 *3.4 '3.2 '3.2 '3.2 '3.1 *3.0 0.8 - *6.1 **11 '2.3 13 *24 3,4 '24 '24 '2,4 *4 14 *2.4'2.4 '2.4 9.3 '2.3 '24 '2.1 'FRrEO Eu, .1 1'0.·7 .3.-1 .4.3...,5 4,0 1.1.1 *i.g 'i.h .4 4, 9 * 44 4 I 4 a!6,1.f J .1 le i1. l. 4. '2.1 9,6 9.1| 3.3 21 1.4 *3.8..1.,1 *3.8 9.4 *1.6 *3.311._14 '2.0 4*-4.0 N.4 SN}2 0.9 '.0 1.0 3-0 LIGMAN B .0 1.0 0.0 6 ..0.no 00 to C SLV F *5.8 '5.0 5. 2.6 4.3 4.9 5.0 4.1 2.5 1.8 42·2 .IEL.4.941·231485 KYKLOPWALL LIED 3 R 1 W 1301m 3000K CRI. 1 130 PHILIPS GARDCO 101 L•10L·530-1,4¥,.Gl-4 PHIUPS 100 LINE LED SCONCE (1)LEDGINE 3.1 LIGHTARMYS 1 2746.533 28 OF 16 LE- #LUXEON T) AT 28y¥ , PHILIPS UGHT'Lili PeRD10NZ10UVB·PGR[)835¥8·LITEPROFILE 5 LE' DOWNLIGHT CLEAR LED 10a0-1/ 00-CRI ]500/10.2h=.40* 1 PGRDCL FINISH '-7211 -Aw-4-4 1 PHILIPS GARDCO SFA.5-130LA. W PHILIPS SFA WrrH TYPE 5 OPTICS. N.LEDGINE 2.2 LIGHT ARRAY OF 80 1 131.29 127 LEDs (LUXEON R) OR]VEN AT .4 /B[1 .50.6 0.3 · 4 J 9 ·0 7 El'-.4 -0.0 0.1 0.0 il.Ali -0.0 0 00 · 34*-< '2.8 '1.5 '0.7 '0.5 '0.9 *2.0 *5.1 '1.8 '0.70.3'0.3'0.5 *1.0 '1.44.7 '0,8 '0. *0.9 +0.9 •0 .0,8 .0,9 10.9 .0.9 *0,.k, 1.0.0 .0. .0.9 0.8.0,7 J ----r------' i CONSERVATION 3.02.74.4 *1.5 '0.60,5 =' TECHNOLOGY L·1.2 '·1.8 2.0 k19 .- 1: v,u.rm···· AJ ;mi.m-£.m-J x - -CH LI-HliNG3 I- ... - -eli, : %1.1 35.71.9 '0.60.3.-474- I .lL.i' + 1 .._.03„4 1. 41-i' 6 1.0410.1-*6,9.0.30.2 25 0//D-BEGACon••rledby 0.9 2.8I.22.8 *1.0'0.6 '0.8 R4NC630K12O-C4322W-CLR ZONE LO- LINE J f e 0.1 .2-3-0*30.4 ' li '0.1 »20.8 *0.8 0.8 *0.7 I 1 150,60.1 0.62.22.0 9.5 5.9 '0.5 'Oj '0.7 04 u€}6 4.6 2.31.00,5 19,1 ·U;-- - -- *0t [I.6 2.1 '1.5 CUoiN·!a ey,f ...0.0 0.1 07 0.8 0.8 06 0,3, -01) r-14 '0.5 0.50,9.i 0.0 *--0.80.8 0.80.60,4-302.-Uk;U----- t.T *2.3 2.1 3.5 '0.8 '0.4 0.1.96].6.6.4.5 *2.2 '1'ii 'O.1 ®5 *£1 *1.9 1.4 '0.4 34 0.0,>.10·70·70.7 20 0.3 "11,1,1,2.0 '0.1 0.5 -0,3 0.3 U *0.2 *0.1 '0..9 .107J f / 6.1 '0.Br-14§ .0.8 .0.2 '0.1 '0.1 *0.1 '0.2 *1.2.3 '0.4 0.6 *1.9 *5.7 *1.9 '0.6'0.2 '0.10.30.9 '2.7 '5.0 '1.5 0.8 *2.£1'4.1.1.9 '0.8 '0-30.1 '0-4 '1.0 *2.63.81.5 4 -1 ' r 1 I , -L.*ug.,4..l.-1 &.3 0.10.1 2.00. 0.50.10.00. 0.6 r 7-i----1 1 1 r, 4:ui Jr=re . . &A F FA·eee·"45 ,» 1 1 ;1% :IL .2--T- 1 1 i r i - ,-- 174·Lt'- 1 6 i' 291 64 -4 :1...:: 9 i ,3 - al,4. PO 2.0 18 1.4 11.0 0.8 8/ 3-tp-,3.9 0.1 '0.0 1-0.1 0.0 '0.10.0 J. ir, . 0.10.0 'CUITOMERIESCRIPnON)38...CH LED OPEN DOWNLIGHT. CLEAR SPECURANISH. CA5TFINNEDMETAL HEAT SINK/HOUSING. FORMED METAL LOWER HOUSING, 1 WHrrE CIRCUIT BOARD WITH 1 LED, SPIN SPECULAR METAL-REFLECTOR-OPENBOTTON 7000132, -022 INE WHITE MULT-CHIP LIGHT 1 3746.805 44.4 Elll,Trn NG DIODE (LED). VERnCAL SASE-UP POSITION. LED 504W 1 43643.57 197.0.9, 1 0 8Aic 1 6W W A .*A 140.0 'O.00.00.0 -O.00.0 'O.00.00.0 10 .O.0 'O.0 1,UN 4 ©;fizfE. 1 k *0.10.20, 2.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.40.7 1.1 0.1 .1.0 LUMCat v 20.02.zo,51 H.R. O.4 -41 :6 F ZONE LOT LINE 1 Statistics Dscrlption Symb/Avii .u lin Ma,UMIn lilli A¥/Iax SITE +1.2 fc 7.9 I .A .A D.2:1 UPPERPAJUUNG +2.9.6.2 fc 20/7·1 9.7:1 0.5:1 GENERAL NOTES ANY PROPOSED LIG/1 1 i IXT URES INS IALLED ON PRIVAI E PROPERTY. ADJACENT TO THE PLBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL BE ORIENTED IN SUCH A MANNER OR LIMITED IN LUMEN OUTPUT TO PREVENT GLARE PROBLEMS AND SHALL NOT EXCEED NATIONAL I. E.S. LIGH-ING STANDARDS FOR DISABILITY GLARE. otto 1 0.2 20' .i · O DETAIL NOTES 6' , 'u w 00.'.4 AAN G DG 11- 0.0 0.- 40.0 Oct 0.0 09> °0 f.° 01'90 .··· 1 , LE j 6.1 G f,,111.1 I-'.:-0.6 7 4.H.4 ?.51,1.i 0 .a 0.8 0.2 Hil 2 EXISTING FIXTURES ARE PART OF CITY S-FREET LIGHTING PACKAGE AND ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE ONLY. EMITTED _]GHT NOT INCLUDED IN PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATION. To.2 6.1 24.11 0.90.2 1- ·010 0.1 0.2 0.6 2.6 6.1 2.32418'0.2 11*4 I P..... t" *110 0.0 .0.1I'l»'2.2 6.8H5.1 .1 FA·1 5 5. 5.1'H5.51,6,2 '40 'ii-'5.739 '. <t» 7-1 'd_ ' '0.0 '0.0 '0.1 03 '0.7 'ZA *4.5 '4,8 *4.8 4,4 -4.1 -4.1 *4.5 '4.8 '4.7 '4.2 '2.3 '09 '0.111 1 11U9 1 L..44 1 1 1 ZONE LOT LINE j D8 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SCALE 1 = 304 Kimley>»Horn SA+R WAZEE CONSULTING INC /9*V SHEARIA'KINSROCKMORE PARTNERS 282NSPERVD,SUE10 CE=0. BCal' 3012512'tN<1€r ISSUED: 12/09/2016 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHEET 13 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN C:\Users\Marcus\appdata\local\temp\AcPublish_20036\PH-PHOTOMETRIC.dwg Marcus 12,08.16 3:30 pm 12/7/2016 5:43:08 PM J:\2016\2016-069-00\Cad\Elec\PH-PHOTOMETRIC.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1$%91"- - (3?1 1 2 1 - FIXTURE TYPE A - FIXTURE TYPES (,3·) FIXTURE TYPE C -n FIXTURE TYPE D -FIXTURE TYPE E FIXTURE TYPE FLE) (2) (5)N. T.S.N.T. S.N.T.S.NTS NTS MANUFACTURER: MOUNTAIN STATES LIGHTING PART #30RTS 7.2/3-6' SGL HOR MAST-ABC-HH-AB-PICK COLOR - .NG--1. --Mountain States C 8889 Series Cutoff LED Fixture Verify LED Court Ind Distribution Type per Job CON 3'liD X 3'H[ H ]INI]N: - I{I.TAIN SIATES C81389 (RXI30) VERIFY lED CO#I & DISI TYPE LED Fix!02[ SEE SEFERATE DETA:LED CWSH[ET. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM· 30' Rouna Topered Stee' Polo, - OPTIONA_: GFI DUP.EX RECEPTACLE W/ TAYMAC ML4006 UN USE' WEATHER.PROOF COVER, POLE SPECIFICATIONS: Pa-E. 30 -SH•FT, ROLND STRAIGH' VEIL EPA NIN11·Ul 115 EPA y W) 1,PH 1.3 6f *MA#VIA#kpr, 3//S-72/1-6' SCI HIP ./M-•BC-1//4.-PICK C.... -n FIXTURE TYPE G (7)N.T. S. f FOLE BY MOUNTA:N STATES LIGHTING CU,cle DI*reter - 45' Hateral - Al.,4,un Pole .Ith Archor Bok cover Voll Thckness 22· MINIMUM[PA - M um 2< In GO MPH zone P·.ri •12SPA-•.34220)-TEN/3·xy-OpT/1-VBC-lil-BK INCLUDED IS A VANDA PROOF HIGH DENS]TV ELAST[NAER-71 CUBIC P[DIDS PER SQUARE FOOT, CON[ BIS[ COVER, f[NISH BLACK PAINTCD PAINT FINISHi POWDEF PA™T OvER ON-V#11-11,6 De POWDER OVE2 ZINC RICH RED PPINEP IGALIMIZED ANCHOR BER-TD F HANDHOLE 2 1/2' X 6· 12'prHITF Fl ATI DETAIL 30'IS- 1 .. . .•. I 1% ,*,it,r,• 8MJ.bUE.fLAIL..11811 03·32>- N.T. S. Z-: "Vils .4 .,IN .ree'Ir,li* -·t' V El. W % i 1 *All, STAn WGIC,DIC PNe »3-*- r.. =i·un·,01. Cow/.10 -37 1!0.... 5,/729 Lroll,ING PIK»,30.-O,3.4,00 -HANI»40/ 4' * 6 I. 3,1-605-se@ 1 0-Whettri/ge P®*es:re LED Fuct.,r,/Pot, i-GE-1 a-C.li ...i.i .1 *unto. Slt„ 30· ...·Il Pot./2.8/0 1 1.11[4 ...1.1..1...1 C[]VER Palh[D 10 I'll[, ./0.11 M ..1.. 1.11[.6 F w:,t,•,tNTS6/11#9../.A-'8389-04.-261.M 2/25/15 I.30#15-7.2/3DRk-WR 1 1 3(fIFTAB ·r, r . ...1 -: M,unt.. 5.t.5 Mounta: Stotef FIXTURE TYPE H -FIXTURE TYPE J -EXISTING CITY PEDESTRIAN POLE -1 EXISTING CITY STREET LIGHTING POLEN.T.S. LP N.T.S. (19 N.T.S. (11 N.T.S. Kimley>)>Horn SA+R WAZEE CONSULTING INC /9'V SHEARIA'KINSROCK'/RE PARTNERS N 5PER Sup. su TE:,0 ¢Eva =.. /1 i 3£33M.·'Lr, C,El ISSUED: 12/09/2016 LIGHTING DETAILS SHEET 14 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN C:\Users\Marcus\appdata\localitempAcPublish. 20036\PH-SITE CUTSHEETS.dwg Marcus 12,08.16 3:29 pm 12/7/2016 5:43:08 PM J \201 6\2016-069-00\Cad\Elec\PH-SITE CUTSHEETS.dwg WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO O.0 6.3 2.8 7.2 0.0 0.0-L-, 23. 1=nmr - 014 RECUO BY LO CODE' n€ COUIT STUeBED '80VE THE C(»KNE' BASE SHALL ...C ....CUT I. J - 14'€ AFG -Ar A ....91!NG> - THE EXACT LOCAn,(S OF ALL BASES SHALL / DE-mRM•ED FROU / TWE AR(1411ECTUZAL AND Crilll DRAINCS. f,Cu,Dole 11€ EP 7 H PCLE BASE ELE.*I CCNNECT STEW GROUND --)- CC»[CRICR TO 1114'ING ;LUG 1119OE . FUE HANDiolE 10 HANDHCLE CO'iER% PER C 250-50 PO. BA5E CO',ER - r:•' -/DBELL CROUTED BASE--NON SMRINKVEBA '1 'GRaIND CON... 7ARITECt- .BAR IN PCLE 8E -ANa 80tls 5LN'FUED./POLE/ .444% A I' *011»1- . PER N.CC 9 -1- 5..... FOR 110 H IND LOADS AND FOR THE LOCAL SOL CC,40[nals -PVC # 40 CONDUIT WANDHOLE COVER CONCRETE POLE BASE--300D P. I. 44 IR'CAL REBARS & 02 ./R nES I / .MORE IN DIAMEmR .AN ™E SOLT IRCLE .1//TER CE /4E POLE AS THE ,!]NIMUM DIAMErER OF THE POLE BASE /11 TYPE "J" POLE BASE DETAIL Wily SCAIE: N.T.S. 4.4 1.5 0.5 0.4 0.8 2.4 3.3 3.2 2.1 b.€ 0 5.1 1.7 g.5 0.3 0.9 3.9 b.3 23. 0 99 .7 4.5 1.5 0.5 0.2 0.6 2.7 14 6 1249 --„9 1.4 4-1.0 b.40.2 b.0 3.00. O.5 U 0.5 5.J/10.0 b.0 3.0 1.4 't2.6 E 3.1 -¥-.0 4 0.0 0 •• 0 0 3.0 1.6 6.6 6.5 7 5.4 1.8 b.6 b.0.0 1 3.4 1.8 b.5 082===; b.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. e==3.0 3.2 1.4 0.5 fo.2 b.1 0.0 b.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.4 6.5 7.7 b.0 0.1 0.4 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.0 b.1 5.2 0.0 b.o b.i b.7 b.0 0.1 0.8 2.7 b.1 0.9 13.2 11. b. 1 1 -0 15.3 r*1£ 0.2 1.1 439 0.0 0.0 0.0.8 0.8 0.6 0.1 /71 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLANLUMINAIRE SCHEDULE tot* sc.ALE: r = to'·-o" MANUFACTLRER LAMPS MOUNTING DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION | VOLTAGE Onr -TYPE TOTAL J DESIGN BASIS ¥A REMARIQS OTHERSCATALOG TYPE HEIGHTNAMESERIES E CANIP. F."RE LE.120 3·BEG4US 66978 CEING lAi J SITE UGH-iNG SIGLE HEAD ,150/1/120 1/BEGUIS 88161 Pol 14··0· Calculation Summary vERIFY EXACT .!G T WITH Label CalcType Unizs Ava Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min ARCTE:TURN.OVERALL GRID Illuminance Fc 2.54 22.2 C.0 N.A.N.A. CANOPY Illuminance Fc 12.92 22.2 6.5 1.99 3.42 PARKING AREA Illuminance Fc 2.57 14.6 0.0 N.A.N.A. I SITE LIG#/G S.GLE .EAD 1 150/ *120 150 SEGWIS 66897 WALL 14'-0' ISSUED: 12/09/2016SI-184 Kimley»>Horn SA+R YYAFEE ---Um-' JCAA (VECTRA BANK) PHOTOMETRIC PLANECTRARANIC 1/ awadsw* 6Wheat Ridge. CO 80033people who listen · design that speaks SHEARSADYINSROCKMORE -L./COLORADO p 303.985.3260 SHEET 15 OF 16 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN rd_- f-1 LJ |30 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO TYPE 'E'TYPE 'J'APE 'Jl' GENERAL NOTE: 1. ALL UGHn NG FIXTURES TO BE FULL-CUTOFF ISSUED: 12/09/2016CSHGAKimley»>Horn SA+R YYMuj METE62 ted,JCAA (VECTRA BANK) PHOTOMETRIC LIGHTING CUT-SHEETS4100 Wadsworth Elvd. people who listen · design that speaks SHEARSADKINSROCKMORE p 303.985.3260 SHEET 16 OF 16COLORADO · Whea: Ridge. CO 80033 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN ERNEQI-IEZE gill.I Wazee Partners. LLC Contact: Tyler Downs 1801 Broadway. Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 720.420.1568 8Gbil=,1 Shears Adkins Rockmore Contac:t: Patrick Bohler 1550 Wyncoop Street. Suite 100 Denver, CO 80202 303.436.9551 La[11122aunkihii Stone Land scape Architects Contact: Ter) Stone 2100 Brentwood Street Lakewood, CO 80214 303.919 9343 WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO W 44th Ave [E OWNERS SIGNATURES £„Lingin= Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Contact Dennis Sobkski 4582 South Uister. Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80237 303.228.2300 BASIS OF BEARING: BEARINGS SHOWN HEREIN ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM RTK FAST STATIC GPS OBSERVATIONS AND ARE BASED UPON THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83,2011), ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST. GTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89°38·20 WEST, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREIN BENCH MARK: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 1 RECOVERED A 0.5· ALUMINUMROD INTHELAWN OF THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY HALL. 150' MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29TH AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS EAST OF WADSWORTH BLVD. ELEV = 5471.62 (NAVD 88) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH ZONING: 5 I f. 3. ge I (we), the undersigned, shall comply with all regulations contained in the Wheat Ridge Zoning> 69 9 Wdls:AA land and structures included in this plan: Code of the City and County of Wheat Ridge. The following signatures constitute all owners of b * w I. 3 WHEATRIDGEJ - CONDOS #i VICINITY MAP i j 0 PROJECT SITE SHEETINDEX: SHEET 1 OF 4 COVER SHEET SHEET 2 OF 4 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT PLAN SHEET 3 OF 4 EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET 4 OF 4 LANDSCAPE PLAN West End 38,LLC By· Tyler Downs, Owner State of Colorado City and County of Wheat Ridge Date F SS SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMMORE HAS PREPARED THIS CONCEPT SUBMITTAL FOR WEST END 38. TO THE BEST OF OUR KNOWLEDGE, THE PROPOSED CONCEPT DESIGN JS EN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MU.C ZONING AND THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS. N LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of SITE STATISTICS: EXISTING ZONING PROPOSED LAND USE NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS PRIMARY STREET (SEE NOTE 14) SIDE STREET (SEE NOTE 14) TOTAL AREA LOT#1 LOT#2 LOT#3 FLOOR AREA BY USE RESIDENTIAL RETAIL PARKING DESIGN ELEMENTS BUILDING HEIGHT {MAX) BUILDING COVERAGE PARKING RESIDENTIAL: 1 SPACE / UNIT (MIN), 2 5/UNIT (MAX) RETAIL: 3 SPACES / 1.000 SQ FT (MIN),7/ 1 000 SQ FT (MAX) ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES 2% MIN COMPACT SPACES 10 % MAX ALLOWED TOTAL BICYCLE (RESIDENTAL): 1 SPACE / 10 UNITS BICYCLE (RETAIL): 1 SPACE / 20 PARKING SPACES PROPOSED USES AND COMPLIANCE SETBACKS SIDESETBACK(MIN) REAR SETBACK (MIN) BUILD.TO TOTAL BUILD-TO PRIMARY STREET (MIN % WITHIN MIN/MAX) (REFER TOSHEET 2 OF 4) TOTAL BUILD-TO SECONDARY STREET (MIN % WITHIN MIN/MAX) Kimley»Horn S j MU-C MIXED USE COMMERCIAL 155 W. 38TH AVE UPHAM ST. [ACRES/SQ Fll GROSS [ACRES/SQ FT] NET 2.873 ACRES/125,166 SQ FT 2.873 ACRES/125,166 SQ FT 0.223 ACRES/9,732 SQ FT 0.223 ACRES/9,732 SQ FT 0.227 ACRES/9,874 SQ FT 0.227 ACRES/9,874 SQ FT 172,856 SQ FT 8,251 SQ FT 51,316 SQ FT REQUIRED PROPOSED 6 STORIES (90')4 STORIES (63') 41,505 GSF REQUIRED PROVIDED 155 [MIN). 388 (MAX)217 SPACES 25 (MIN),58 (MAX)44 SPACES 5 SPACES (MIN)6 SPACES 26 SPACES IMAX)6 SPACES 261 SPACES 16 SPACES 16 SPACES 2 SPACES 2 SPACES ITH ZONING: REQUIRED PROVIDED 01 7-7' 5' 5' REQUIRED PROVIDED 50% WITHIN 52% WITHIN 0-20 0'-20 30% WITHIN 89% WITHIN 0·-20 0·-20 44- R WAZE E PARTNERS PARCEL ONE THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. EXCEPT THE WEST 100 FEET THEREOF AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 85 FEET OF THE EAST 175 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23, AND FURTHER EXCEPTING THAT PORTION AS DEED TO THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE IN DEED RECORDED OCTOBER 8.1990 AT RECEPTION NO. 90086571, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PARCEL TWO: THE NORTH 85 FEET OF THE EAST 175 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER (SW y. SE y. SW % SE F.) OF SECTION 23, TOWNSH]P 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE ETH P.M. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLOPIDO. PARCELTHREE: LOT 1. E.S. ALLEN SUBDIVISION, RECORDED JANUARY 4,2010 AT RECEPTION NO. 2010000090, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL FOUR (A) A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING ATA POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 52640 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAD SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER: THENCE NORTHERLY. PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 421 15 FEET. THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131.65 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS A DISTANCE OF 421,15 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER: THENCE ON AN .ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE OF 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 131 82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE.DESCRIBED LAND CONVEYED TO THE AMERICAN OIL COMPANY ON THE 21 ST DAY OF MARCH. 1972, TO WIT: A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST '4 OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE GTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET NOR™ERLY AND 526.40 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST%: THENCE NORTHERLY, PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST Y.. A DISTANCE OF 100 0 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4, A DISTANCE OF 131.79 FEET; THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS. A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST%: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE FRIGHT OF 89 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND ALONG A LINE OF 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 7.. A DISTANCE OF 131.82 FEET TO THE PARCEL OF LAND. COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO. SAVE AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION OF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED LAND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL FOUR (8) AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL FOUR (B) A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE STH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. BEING MORE PART]CULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT 30.00 FEET NORTHERLY AND 45.00 FEET EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER WHICH POINT IS THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 1. PARKAND SHOP SUBDIVISION FIRST AMENDMENT: THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1,30.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL MTH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 481.40 FEET TO THE MOST SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1. PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF 306.15 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUING NORTHERLY. ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND PARALLEL WITH SAID WEST LINE. A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET TO AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RTGHT OF 89 DEGREES 45 MINUTES 00 SECONDS AND ALONG AN EASTERLY LINE OF SAID BLOCK 1 AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER, A DISTANCE OF 131.65 FEET TO AN EASTERLY CORNER OF SAID BLOCK 1: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 37 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF 115.00 FEET: THENCE ON AN ANGLE TO THE RIGHT OF 90 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 23 SECONDS AND PARALLEL WITH THEE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF 131.70 FEET, MORE OR LESS. TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNiNG. PARCEL FIVE· THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE SWIM SE1/4 SW1/4 SE1/4 OF SECTION 23. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST OF THE STH P M.. EXCEPT THE SOUTH 30.00 FEET THEREOF FOR NORTH 38TH AVENUE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON. STATE OF COLORADO. GENERAL NOTES: 1. ANGLES NOT INDICATED OTHERWISE ARE EITHER 90 DEGREES OR A SUPPLEMENT OF THE ANGLE DESCRIBED. 2. PRIVATE ROADWAYS AND DRIVES SHALL BE POSTED WITH "FIRE LANE- SIGNS AS REQUIRED BY THE WHEAT RIDGE FIRE DEPARTMENT. 3. PARKING SPACES FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINEATED WITH UPRIGHT SIGNS. 4. APPROVAL OF THIS PLAN DOES NOT CONSTITUTE OR IMPLY COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT REQUIREMENTS 5. THE SITE SHALL BE LANDSCAPED DURING THE GROWING SEASON OF APRIL 1 ST TO OCTOBER 1 ST. 6. AN ACCESS EASEMENT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES IS HEREBY GRANTED ON AND ACROSS ALL AREAS FOR POLICE, FIRE, MEDICAL AND OTHER EMERGENCY VEHICLES FOR THE PROVISION OF EMERGENCY SERVICES. 7, ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM. TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE IRRIGATED BY A SEPARATE ZONE FROM SOC)/GRASS; THIS INCLUDES TREES AND SHRUBS PLANTED IN SOD/GRASS AREAS. 8. BICYCLE PARKING RACKS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. 9. PRIVATE ROADWAYS ARE NON-DEDICATED STREETS AND WILL NOT BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY AND COUNTY OF WHEAT RIDGE. 10.THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMONLY ACCESSED EASEMENT IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THIS DEVELOPMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS. 11.THIS CONCEPT PLAN IS SUBJECT TO A LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THIS DOCUMENT, 1 1 A.D. 2016 by Witness by hand and offical seal My Commission Expires: Nitarv Pi,blir Address SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE 1, Rob D. Snodgrass, a registered land surveyor in the state of Colorado, do hereby certify that the survey for the West End 38 Concept Plan was made under my supervision and the accompanying plan accurately and properly shows said survey. Rob D. Snodgrass, PLS #36580 APPROVALS Approved by For the Zoning Administrator Date Approved by For the Manager of Community Date Planning and Development CLERKAND RECORDER'S CERTIFICATION State of ColoradoCity and County of Wheat Ridge I hereby certify that this instrument was filed for record in my office at o'clock m, 20 Reception # Clerk and Recorder, Ex-Officio Clerk of City and County of Wheat Ridge By: Deputy Fee: ISSUED: 12/09/2016 COVER SHEET SHEET 01 OF 04 WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN SS Ist SHEARSADKINS ROCKMORE, 12/8/2016 213:18 PC:\Users\jemhoADocuments\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_jemhof.rveD T-»iu,inr•r' Pul\ Inl . 1/ T l rn,i! On.+r,rn, I.irl- rrw{ Titlnklnr!,r\ vn//111//OT' rn-,n, r..I+ rli.in WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO SECURE PARKING GATE BELOW @ LVL 81 r.t)111* 10'-1'L-\ SECURE PARKING GATE AT LEVEL 1 -1V1 Al PARKING ACCESS T J LEVEL BlPARKING BRIDGE ABOVE @ LEVELZ, -L---114'-5' CLEARANCE BENEATH 3 i n THE BRIDGE (M]N. REO PER FD ACCESS) 1 V 1----1- .-IO'-0 TRANSFORMER RESIDENTIAL TRASH ENCLOSURE, CMU STRUCTURAL WALL WITH 1 -- 19 BRICK VENEER AND PRECAST CAP W]TH ----«--- ---- «rl_111111 I/ )1 IJAmOPAQUE STEEL ACCESS DOORS i-ENT'. C 4rY' iwl w te.D•,G : 11/1,Mi.-, .-I=m SPAI POOL Zt 1.1 ,1111 *=PRIVATE COURTYARDEL 4.},l•OE 71•, A E 25 BKI, 30· WATER -1- < INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT J- -4PER REC. NO F0134564 BRIDGE ABOVE @ LEVELS. 2-4- 1 20 TYPICAL PARKING SPACE TYPICAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE L_ j UNT' Frc 12.t .A -' E-P¢·EAV IT,A In I LNrT I FOLES'0%\ ri Flt--1- lt[[]]P LAI Jr LOICE t,77'ECEFmC j -7- 1 -9 TRANSFORMER 4=» ..9-11 1 Ch --A L) , <,--· ,n < - INTERIOR TRASH TERMINATIN ROOM 0'-0' a[TAIL' -9717'--m_-r ,_/9, I ./.-4/ .E liE - I -731-7--Er r 30'.O INGRESS/EGRESS 1 1 1 AND UTILITY - EASEMENT PER REC. INO. F0156207 RETAIL CANOPY ABOVE 'lk 2 VECTRA BANK SITE ' ' A 4 \= 11 1 11 lid k ' 38TH AVE (PRIMARY) R.O.W. 30·-0" (VARIES) RETAIL CANOPY ABOVE · CONCEPT PLAN 1 =30-0 ISSUED: 12/09/2016Kimley>,>Horn SA+ R WAZE E ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT PLAN PARTNERS SHEET 02 OF 04SHEARSADKINS ROCKMORE 1. WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN 12/8/2016 2:13:20 PC:\Users\jemhoADocuments\1671 38th & Upham - Central 2017_jemhof.rveD nrrlii,inna rlwin 9nl In 1 1 rhdi Arirl,rlrr ii„,r· nn.-4 Till.nlhln.+A ·.nO,<111nnOTA rn,w n,·,t rl,Min WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LY[NG IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO LEGE.N 33 + 1 I PROPOSED CONTOURS 1 a /LIMITS oF CONSTRUCTION er ' . l39. LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONn |FFE=5441.00| J I N8938'44"E 4 304.1'7 Sr PROPRTY LINE lillilili - r- 1 k g Y 1 4 -- -LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE/ EXISTING CONTOURS CONSTRUCTION 1 VEHICLE TRACKING CONTROLe 1 40 1 1 .O M INLET PROTECTION a€ \ 0 , ,-® N89-38'20*E131.81 36.11 7/ 1. Ip C36.76 ' F CW 3 NO'12'07"W 114.3'n -;-2- PROPERTY UNE - \ I LAI r - SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG SILT FENCE - CONSTRUCTION FENCE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA STABILIZED STAGING AREA , STREET SWEEPING 1 GATE- 9.89 / FLL -f FFE== |FF C L -1 4-_u__ J 7 1 i 1 35 31-4 --U 1% ir FFE==5430.33| 1 3-- FFE=543 4>7 3' I LJ- 441.00| 1 upr 1 1 '·_ 1 FFE=5441.CI rl r 41 39.36 -11. 1 FFE=5438.33 FFE=5438.33 BRIDGE-/_4 1 PROPOSED ROW SF- €»CF - Ss 1 1 I . 1 *THE CONTRACTOR MAY USE ROCK SOCKS, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS. SILT FENCE OR CANDY RECYCLER BAGS FOR PERIMETER AND INTERNAL CONTROLS BASED ON SITE CONDITIONS. THIS CONTROL SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DO¥STREAM END OF STREETS USED FOR MATERIAL STORATE OR HANDLING, AND AT ALL DRIVEWAY CUTS 5441.00 FOR SITE ACCESS.411h 1- |45\.3 ' I Gl/MAL NU libelf 1 11; 1 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ADJACENT STREETS/DRIVES TO BE FREE OF k SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS. STEET SWEEPING SHALL BE CONDUCTED ON AN INTERMITTENT BASIS AS NEEDED TO CONTROL SEDIMENT OR AS REQUIRED Err THE1 LUMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ADJACENT PROPERTY OmIERS. AT A MINIMUM, STREET SWEEPING SHALL TAKE PLACE ON A DAILY BASIS UPON COMPLETION OF THAT DAY'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. E-T-v-T-V--pr-1/-t--'7-1 .STABILIZED STAGING AREA AND CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA SHALL BE RELOCATED )0 WITH ALL REQUIRED BMPS TO A DESIGNATED OFF-SITE LOCATION WHICH WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE PROPERTY OWNER. I :39.26 11_fi@j ° 2 li 1 \ r 38.33 -39 -6 //0 -=-=+- FL 39.44 LFn r,39.87 -- 38.37 - In |FFE= 1 11 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARINGS DERIVED FROM RTK FAST STATIC GPS OBSERVATION 8 AND ARE BAZED UPON THE COLORADO COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83, 2011), ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89'38'20" WE8T, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS SHOWN HEREIN. AMUVI 3919 SF30 j 2 11 BENCHMARK: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 1 .-- LIP -\ ,4] p.2 S89'38'20-W_/ 21| _6..cac=r=] E L39.01 9'(IA i RECOVERED A 0.5" ALUMINUM ROD IN THE LAWN OF DIE WHEAT RIDGE CITYOr 1 9.131.91 7 \ ,1 Ar di N012'07W , - 40-jh-13*dit 1 FL -L-/2 HALL, 150' MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29TH AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS EAST OF WADSWORTH BLVD. £1. g 41 5439.001 1 1 ELEVATION = 5471.62 (NAVE) 88) 39.75 FL - - .... FFE=5440.50 @40.37 FL n - 1 I 'Lilli-3 1-1 UMITS OF CONSTRUCTION-=. -$- ___H41*3 -40.55 FL k|| \' 1/ A1,-39.52 F.FFE==5438.38| r LA SS -71 3339-twi LIL_\ -- ==623<51- --2 -)---12_ ala. - ---do:j 4 L988'20"Ei N.. / @g f NORTH, 4 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION-1 W 38TH AVENUE 'GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET= IllitIlLIN -:II1 60 ,/- 1 --r I t Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE DARTNERSSHEARIA'KIN'ROCKMORE ISSUED: 12/09/2016 EROSION CONTROL AND GRADING PLAN SHEET 3 OF 4 WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN 12/8/2016 3:51:57 PM K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\CADD\Construction\Site Plan\096331009EC_GD.dwg WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO 1 1 "11: 11 t '11 :11:j r laci l 11 1 1 11 lili 1 1 11 r//5/////U/////////,r ··421.-0 6i_IL i ' ./Ulap. . ¥1 6 1 1://1//m 24 1 1 1 -- d u RAISED F'LANTER ,i SIKERACK.Tr.- n' tAAISEED PLANIER :rLJ 1 Sf¤RMER " L.4- r i lins d pi .3..V1 4-r---r-J 1 1 El'E 2 1 ' L--1=-3 3 .3 _RAISED 91-_l_Ak-k..1*'L.,_ A.I --AA_-N CONCEPT PLAN LEGEND _ _ TYP X /t-7.FT-v-T-lr T-v-T-irt--r·-1 2-\ N1 1 ke,1 : t-4682297 /WLTYP. - - STUW.biL=.1.-le=%)'ll 1 'SHRUBS & oRN GNE EE (Se Prv ny.i.:r•n-1 SPECIALBWING. TYP. 1 / // Al- -1 Ci M PE+NN-S.VINES CONCRETE i TP-EMENT. T·,p. 1 PELEpENCE 40 - 41 -SEREENING FENCE:-uwz.i.3 i i il M-BIKE "" IP 0 £ -4 - \ 7-LIE O 0 L__ . ._ FXISmNGHONFY[DCUST POTENTIAL SPECIALVING ™P' CONCRETE RAVFMENT TYP <TREESTOBEPRE CON'FLE CURE FPLANTEREDGE 1 CONCRETESEAT L 1 -,I--lpil 'ALL .IJ' U ,-tWL - - -1*.*affl**611- 4--29'-*sW-#Q-2·f*·{t7*, - STREETLIGHT.TY. I | PED LIG TYEU'VEST 38THAVENUE1 -- L_ 1 . =SERVED 'P ETLIGHTTYKIKE *CITY.. 1 kil- d# 1-29-- --I-il--imm -1-- -I--Immill- Imill-fill errlimil---E ISSUED: 12/09/2016 STONEKimley>»Horn SA+R WAZEzE CSH€* 1/m?EB2 LANDSCAPE 01 30)' 60' 90' LANDSCAPE PLANARCHITECTS PARINERS COLORADO 303.919.9,43 SCALE 1"=30'-0"SHEET 4 OF 4SHEARIADKINS ROCKMORE WEST END 38 CONCEPT PLAN 12/8/2016 4:00:17 PM /Users/tsionelll/Desktop/Stone LA/SLA Projects/160538th and Upham/CAD/Sheets/SD-Site PlanO,+/nl I r.1re,--n PIIr, /'irl Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development Northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 Terracon Project No. 25165377 Prepared for: Wazee Partners, LLC Denver, Colorado Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Wheat Ridge, Colorado [st IREA&55 D terracon.com lierracon Environmental I Facilities I Geotechnical I Materials 1 October 5, 2016 1Ierracon Wazee Partners, LLC 1801 Broadway, Suite 1175 Denver, CO 80202 Attn: Mr. Tyler Downs E: twdowns@wazeepartners.com C: (720) 420-1568 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development Northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Mr. Downs: Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has completed the geotechnical engineering exploration for the above referenced project. This study was performed in general accordance with our proposal number P25165377 dated August 16, 2016. This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical recommendations concerning earthwork and the design and construction of foundations, floor slabs and pavement thickness recommendations for the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. i 0 33822 U' 1 -O t .:cr 'Q: 10/5/16 4 €tk6=AL a.sp- Scott B. Myers, P.E. Geotechnical Department Manager FIA . lfLA. John N. Haas, P.E. Senior Staff Engineer 3.- su.itj Enclosures CC:Addressee (PDF) 1 - File Ten-acon Consultants, Inc. 10625 W. I-70 Frontage Rd N, Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 P [303] 423-3300 F [303] 423-3353 www.terracon.com Environmental I Facilities I Geolechnical I Materials Geotechnical Engineering ReportProposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1 2.1 Project Description 1 2.2 Site Location and Description 2 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3 3.2 7%Profile 33 3.3 Groundwater 4 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 6 4.1 Geotechnical Considerations 6 4.1.1 Existing Fill Materiak 6 4.1.2 Low Strength Soils ..7 4.1.3 Shallow Groundwater. .. 7 4.1.4 Expansive Soils and Bedrock Materials .. 7 4.1.5 Existing Structures 8 4.1.6 Foundation Interaction 8 4.2 Earthwork . 8 4.2.1 Site Preparation 8 4.2.2 Material Types g 4.2.3 Compaction Requirements 10 4.2.4 Excavation and Trench Construction .11 4.2.5 Grading and Drainage...11 4.2.6 Earthwork Construction Considerations 12 4.2.7 Soluble Sulfate Test Resultq 13 4.3 Foundation Recommendations 14 4.3.1 Spread Footing Design Recommendations .14 4.3.2 Spread Footing Construction Considerations 16 4.3.3 Post-Tensioned Slab Design Recommendations .17 4.3.4 Post-Tensioned Slab Construction Considerations .19 4.3.5 Drilled Pier Design Recommendations 19 4.3.6 Drilled Pier Construction Considerations . 21 4.4 Seismic Considerations 9? 4.5 Swimming Pool Design and Construdion Recommendations...............................22 4.6 Interior Floors / Garage Floor.. 23 4.6.1 Interior Floors / Garage Floor Design Recommendations........................23 4.6.2 Interior Floors / Garage Floor Construction Considerations.....................25 47 Exterior Flatwork 25 4.7.1 Exterior Flatwork Design Recommendations 95 4.7.2 Exterior Flatwork Construction Considerations 26 4.8 Lateral Earth Pressures .26 4.9 Pavement Design and Construction 98 4.9.1 Design Traffic 98 4.9.2 Subgrade Soils 28 4.9.3 Recommended Minimum Pavement Sections and Materials...................29 4.9.4 Construction Considerations 29 4.9.5 Pavement Performance 30 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS 31 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDIX A - FIELD EXPLORATION Exhibit A-1 Field Exploration Description Exhibit A-2 Site Location Exhibit A-3 Aerial Image Exploration Plan Exhibit A-4 Boring Location Plan Exhibits A-5 to A-37 Boring Logs APPENDIX B - LABORATORY TESTING Exhibit B-1 Laboratory Testing Description Exhibits B-2 to B-38 Swell-Consolidation Test Results Exhibits B-39 to B-41 Grain Size Distribution Exhibits B-42 to B-50 Summary of Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX C - SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Exhibit C-1 General Notes Exhibit C-2 Unified Soil Classification Exhibit C-3 Description of Rock Properties Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A geotechnical engineering exploration has been prepared for the proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development to be located northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Based on the information obtained from our subsurface exploration and the laboratory testing completed, the site appears suitable for the proposed construction; however, the following geotechnical conditions will need to be considered: • Up to about 8 feet of fill was encountered on the subject site. We do not possess any information regarding whether the fill was placed under the observation of a geotechnical engineer. In our opinion, the existing fill should not be used to support foundations or slab-on-grade construction without complete removal and modification and within pavement areas without partial removal and modification. We anticipate that the existing fill can be reused for support of shallow foundations, slabs-on-grade and pavements, provided any deleterious fill materials are removed and some movement can be tolerated. • Based on the geotechnical engineering analyses, subsurface exploration and laboratory test results, the proposed buildings may be constructed on spread footing or post- tensioned slab-on-grade foundations bottomed on new engineered fill, provided the owner is willing to risk some potential movement. Alternatively, if the owner is not willing to accept the risk of movement associated with a post-tensioned slab foundation systems or if building loads are high (as anticipated for the proposed garage) the proposed buildings may be constructed on drilled pier foundation systems. • For buildings constructed on drilled pier or spread footing foundations, slabs-on-grade may be utilized for the interior floor systems when constructed on native soils or new engineered fill. If very little movement can be tolerated, a structural floor, supported independent of the subgrade materials, is recommended. • Based on the 2015 International Building Code (IBC), the IBC seismic site classification for this site is D. • Low strength soils are locally present on the site. Consequently, low strength soils will be encountered below slabs-on-grade and/or at foundation bearing depth and these conditions will likely require some corrective work. Corrective work could involve removal and re-compaction/replacement, in-place soil densification or deepening footing excavations to suitable bearing materials. • The amount of movement associated with foundations, floor slabs, slabs-on-grade, etc. will be related to the wetting of the underlying soils and bedrock. Therefore, it is imperative the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed to reduce potential movement. Moisture conditioning and/or replacement of the on-site fill materials and/or native soils and bedrock should follow the recommendations outlined in the "Earthwork" section of this report. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable i Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon This summary should be used in conjunction with the entire report for design purposes. It should be recognized that details were not included or fully developed in this section, and the report must be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. The section titled GENERAL COMMENTS should be read for an understanding of the report limitations. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable ii GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED 38TH & UPHAM MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT NORTHWEST OF WEST 38TH AVENUE AND UPHAM STREET WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Terracon Project No. 25165377 October 5, 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION A geotechnical engineering report has been prepared for the proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development to be located northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. As part of our subsurface exploration, thirty-three (33) borings (designated as Boring Nos. 1 to 32 and Pl) were drilled at the site to varying depths of about 5 to 35 feet below existing site grades. Boring Logs along with a Boring Location Plan are included in Appendix A of this report. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: • Subsurface soil and bedrock conditions • Groundwater levels • Earthwork • Grading and drainage • Lateral earth pressures 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 Project Description • Foundation design and construction • Seismic site classification • Floor slab design and construction • Pavement design and construction Item Description Site layout See Appendix A, Boring Location Plan Proposed construction We have been provided with a conceptual layout of the proposed development. The existing buildings will be demolished and removed, and a multi-story apartment building parking garage and stand-alone retail building will be constructed.The apartment building will be about 34,000 square feet in plan area, while the parking garage will be about 32,700 square feet in plan area. The standalone retail building will be about 11,800 square feet in plan area. We do not anticipate that below grade levels Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 1 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Item Description will be constructed for the proposed buildings and garage. A pool is also anticipated to be constructed as part of the development. We assume the proposed apartment buildings will be of wood frame construction with slab-on-grade floors while the parking Building construction garage will most likely be of cast-in-place concrete construction. We anticipate the proposed retail building will be of structural steel construction with slab-on-grade floors. Anticipated foundation systems Spread footings Below grade areas None anticipated Columns: 800 to 1,200 kips (assumed) Maximum loads Walls: 2 to 6 kIf (assumed) Slabs: 200 psf (assumed) Excavation depth Cut and fill, 3 feet (+A) max Free-standing retaining walls Up to 6 feet in height (anticipated) Grading Cut and fill, 3 feet (+A) max We anticipate asphalt or portland cement concrete paved parking Infrastructure areas and drives, along with the installation of utilities within about 5 to 8 feet of finished site grades. 2.2 Site Location and Description Item Location Description The proposed development will be northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street in Denver, Colorado. The general location of the proposed project is 39.7702° N 105.0787° W. Existing improvements The site contains two existing buildings. The existing buildings consist of a one-story maintenance building and a two-story commercial building. The foundation systems of the existing buildings are unknown, but based on experience in the area we anticipate the structures are constructed on spread footings. Current ground cover Existing topography Ground cover in the area of the proposed project consists of concrete and asphalt pavements, grass, landscaped areas and aggregate surfaced areas. The site appears to be relatively flat with an elevation difference of less than about 3 feet. Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 2 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 Geology Surficial geologic conditions at the site, as mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) CTrimble and Machette, 1979), consist of windblown sand and silts of Holocene and Pleistocene Ages. These materials, as mapped in this area, are generally on the order of 15 to 25 feet in thickness. Bedrock underlying the surface units consists of the Denver and Arapahoe Formations of Paleocene and Upper Cretaceous Age. These formations within this area have been reported to include claystone, sandstone, and siltstone. The thickness of these units has been reported to be on the order of 900 feet. Mapping completed by the Colorado Geological Survey (2Hart, 1972) indicates the site is located in an area of "Windblown Sand and Silt". These materials are identified as being predominantly low swelling, but may be moderate swelling. Some deposits have the potential to settle or collapse after wetting under applied loads. The geologic conditions presented in this section were obtained by locating the subject site on available large-scale geologic maps. Due to the scales involved, precise location of the site can be difficult to determine. In addition, the large-scale geologic maps describe only general trends. Local variations are possible and site specific geology may differ from those described above. A site-specific detailed geologic description is beyond the scope of this project. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, geologic hazards at the site are anticipated to be low. Seismic activity in the area is anticipated to be low, and the property should be relatively stable from a structural standpoint. With proper site grading around proposed structures, erosional problems at the site should be reduced. 3.2 Typical Profile Based on the results of the borings for this exploration, subsurface conditions on the site can be generalized as follows: Trimble, Don E. and Machette, Michael N., 1979,Geologic Map of the Greater Denver Area, Front Range, Urban Corridor, Colorado,United States Geological Survey, Map 1-856-H. 2Hart, Stephen S., 1972,Potentially Smiling Soil and Rock in the Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado,Colorado Geological Survey, Sheet 2 of 4. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 3 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 lierracon Material Description Asphalt Approximate Depth to Bottom of Stratum below Existing Site Grade About 4 to 6 inches, Encountered in Boring Nos. 14,15,18,19,20,22,23 and Pl. Consistency/ Relative Density/ Hardness N/A Fill (and possible fill) materials consisting of sand with varying amounts of clay, silt, organics and gravel About 2 to 8 feet, Encountered in Boring Nos. 3,4,9,11,14,15,18,19, 20,21,22,23,24,26,27, 28,29,30,31,32 and Pl Variable Native soils consisting of sand with varying amounts of organics,About 5 to 29 feet, clay and gravel and lean clay with Maximum depth explored in varying amounts of sand and Boring No. Pl gravel* Sand: very loose to medium dense Clay: medium stiff to stiff About 35 feet, Bedrock consisting of claystone Maximum depth explored in remaining borings * - A petroleum type odor was noted in some of the exploratory borings Weathered to very hard Stratification boundaries on the boring logs represent the approximate location of changes in soil and material types; in-situ, the transition between materials may be gradual. Further details of the borings can be found on the Boring Logs in Appendix A. Laboratory testing indicates the sand fill materials and native sand and clay soils have nil to low swell potential, while the claystone bedrock in the area has low to high expansive potential. Results of water soluble sulfate testing performed on samples obtained during our field exploration indicated a "not applicable" severity with an exposure class of SO based on the American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines. A summary of laboratory test results is included in Appendix B. 3.3 Groundwater The borings were observed for groundwater while drilling. The groundwater levels are noted on the Boring Logs, and are summarized below. Responsive • Resourceful . Reliable 4 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Boring No. Depth to groundwater while drilling Depth to groundwater at least one day after drilling and date measured 1 11 feet 2 8 feet 3 None encountered -* 4 None encountered 5 8 feet - 6 8 feet -* 7 None encountered - 8 None encountered - 9 None encountered - 10 15-1 /2 feet - 11 10-1/2 feet 12 None encountered - 13 None encountered -* 14 17 feet 15 19 feet 16 None encountered - 17 None encountered -* 18 15-1/2 feet - 19 None encountered 20 None encountered - 21 None encountered -* 22 14 feet 23 None encountered - 24 None encountered - 25 None encountered - 26 None encountered - 27 None encountered - 28 None encountered 29 12-1/2 feet - 30 None encountered - 31 10 feet - 32 9 feet - Pl 11 feet - * Boring was backfilled after obtaining initial groundwater measurement. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 5 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 • Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon These observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of the preliminary field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times or at other locations. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. Based upon review of USGS maps (3Hillier, et al, 1983), regional groundwater beneath the project area is located in unconsolidated alluvial deposits, generally between 10 to 20 feet from the present ground surface. Zones of perched and/or trapped groundwater may also occur at times in the subsurface soils overlying bedrock, on top of the bedrock surface or within permeable fractures in the bedrock materials. The location and amount of perched water is dependent upon several factors, including hydrologic conditions, type of site development, irrigation demands on or adjacent to the site, fluctuations in water features, seasonal and weather conditions. Groundwater level fluctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff, and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 4.1 Geotechnical Considerations Based on subsurface conditions encountered in the borings, the site appears suitable for the proposed construction from a geotechnical point of view provided certain precautions and design and construction recommendations outlined in this report are followed. We have identified geotechnical conditions that could impact design and construction of the proposed buildings and other site improvements. 4.1.1 Existing Fill Materials Up to about 8 feet of fill materials was encountered in portions of the site. It should be noted that fill depths presented in the boring logs are approximate and the depth and composition of fill should be expected to vary. We do not possess any information regarding whether the fill was placed under the observation of a geotechnical engineer. Based upon the results of our field exploration and laboratory testing, it is our opinion the existing fill should not be used to support foundations, interior slabs, exterior slabs-on-grade or pavement construction without complete removal and modification. 3Hillier, Donald E.; Schneider, Paul A., Jr, and Hutchinson, E. Carter, 1983,Depth to Water Table (1976-1977) in the Greater Denver Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado,United States Geological Survey, Map 1-856-K Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 6 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 lierracon If the owner is willing to accept a higher risk of movement for pavements and exterior slabs, consideration could be given to overexcavating the existing fill materials below these elements to a depth of about 2 feet, then processing, moisture conditioning and compacting the materials back to subgrade elevation. It should be noted that there exists the potential for construction debris and/or domestic trash to be encountered within the fill on some portions of the site. Since construction debris was not encountered within the borings, the potential for encountering construction debris and/or domestic trash is considered to be low. This should be verified by additional geotechnical exploration or evaluation at the site. If additional exploration is not performed, the owner should make allowances for such conditions to exist in the preparation of the project budget and/or construction plans. The existing fill can be reused as engineered fill below foundations, slabs-on-grade and pavements, provided any deleterious materials are removed and some movement can be tolerated. Some removal and replacement may be required if unsuitable or soft materials are exposed. 4.1.2 Low Strength Soils Test boring data indicate that low strength soils will be locally present. Consequently, low strength soils will most likely be encountered below on grade slabs and/or at foundation bearing depth and these conditions will likely require some corrective work. Corrective work could involve removal and re-compaction/replacement, in-place soil densification or deepening footing excavations to suitable bearing materials. In any event, Terracon should be contacted to observe foundation excavations to evaluate bearing conditions and to provide guidance concerning corrective work (if needed). 4.1.3 Shallow Groundwater Groundwater was encountered during drilling of this exploration at depths ranging from 8 to 19 feet below existing ground surface. Because below grade levels are not planned for the structures, we do not anticipate groundwater will adversely impact the proposed construction of the buildings; however, installation of deep utilities may be influenced by the presence of the shallow groundwater. In addition, although not likely, it is possible excavation of the existing fill materials may encounter perched groundwater conditions. We anticipate isolated pockets of perched groundwater could be controlled by shallow trenches drained to sump pits where the water can be removed by pumping. Excavations below the encountered groundwater levels will likely require more aggressive dewatering measures. 4.1.4 Expansive Soils and Bedrock Materials Laboratory testing indicates the sand fill materials and native sand and clay soils have nil to low swell potential, while the claystone bedrock in the area has low to high expansive potential. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 7 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016. Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon This report provides recommendations to help mitigate the effects of soil shrinkage and expansion. However, even if these procedures are followed, some movement and cracking in the building, pavements, and flatwork should be anticipated. The severity of cracking and other damage such as uneven floor slabs will probably increase if any modification of the site results in excessive wetting or drying of the expansive clays and bedrock. Eliminating the risk of movement and distress is generally not be feasible, but it may be possible to further reduce the risk of movement if significantly more expensive measures are used during construction. It is imperative the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed to reduce movement. 4.1.5 Existing Structures We understand the existing buildings and pavements will be demolished and removed. All existing foundations, utilities and all fill that should be removed during demolitions operations. Drilled piers, if encountered, should be truncated a minimum 3 feet below new foundations, slab or pavement construction elevations. All materials derived from the demolition of the existing foundations, exterior flatwork and pavements should be removed from the site and should not be allowed for use in any on-site fills, unless the materials are properly processed and meet the criteria presented in the "Import Material Specifications" section of this report. 4.1.6 Foundation Interaction We anticipate the parking garage will likely be constructed on a drilled pier foundation system while the proposed apartments may be constructed on shallow foundations. Differential movement between the parking garage and adjacent apartments constructed on shallow foundations will likely occur; therefore, if possible, we recommend the adjacent apartments be structurally independent of the parking garage. We estimate the differential movement between the garage and adjacent apartments constructed on shallow foundations could be on the order of about 1 inch, depending upon the foundation systems selected for the proposed apartments. 4.2 Earthwork The following presents recommendations for site preparation, excavation, subgrade preparation and placement of engineered fills on the project. All earthwork on the project should be observed and evaluated by Terracon. 4.2.1 Site Preparation Stripped materials consisting of asphalt, demolition debris, vegetation, unsuitable fills and organic materials should be wasted from the site or used to revegetate landscaped areas or exposed slopes after completion of grading operations. Where possible, the site should be initially graded to create a relatively level surface to receive fill and to provide for a relatively uniform thickness of fill beneath the proposed structures. All exposed areas that will receive fill, once properly cleared, should be scarified to a minimum depth Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 8 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon of 12 inches, properly moisture conditioned and compacted. It is imperative the moisture content of prepared materials be protected from moisture loss. Although evidence of underground facilities such as grease pits, septic tanks, cesspools, existing foundations and basements was not observed during the site reconnaissance, such features could be encountered during construction. If unexpected fills or underground facilities are encountered, such features should be removed and the excavation thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or construction. It is anticipated that excavations for the proposed construction can be accomplished with conventional earthmoving equipment. Depending upon depth of excavation and seasonal conditions, groundwater may be encountered in excavations on the site. Groundwater seeping into excavations at this site could most likely be controlled by shallow trenches leading to a sump pit where the water could be removed by pumping. Soft unstable subgrade soils will most likely be encountered as excavation bottoms approach the groundwater elevation. Where unstable conditions are encountered or develop during construction, workability may be improved by overexcavation of wet zones and mixing these soils with crushed gravel or recycled concrete and recompaction. The stability of subgrade soils may be affected by precipitation, repetitive construction traffic or other factors. If unstable conditions are encountered or develop during construction, workability may be improved by overexcavation of wet zones and mixing these soils with crushed gravel. Use of geotextiles could also be considered as a stabilization technique. Lightweight excavation equipment may be required to reduce subgrade pumping. 4.2.2 Material Types Engineered fill should meet the following material property requirements: Fill Type 1 USCS Classification Acceptable location for placement On-site clay soils are considered suitable for reuse asOn-site clay soils CL compacted fill below foundations, slab and pavement areas. On-site sand soils are considered suitable for reuse as On-site sand soils SC, SP-SM, SM compacted fill below foundations, slab and pavement areas. Processed demolition debris (asphalt and concrete) Properly processed asphalt is considered suitable for reuse as compacted fill below foundation, slab and pavement areas, provided the materials are processed and blended with on-site soils. Imported soils Varies Imported soils meeting the gradation outlined herein can be considered acceptable for use as engineered fill beneath slabs and pavements. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 9 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Fill Type 1 uses Classification Acceptable location for placement 1. Controlled, compacted fill should consist of approved materials that are free of organic matter and debris. Frozen material should not be used, and fill should not be placed on a frozen subgrade. A sample of each material type should be submitted to the geotechnical engineer for evaluation. 2. Care should be taken during the fill placement process to avoid zones of dis-similar fill. Improvements constructed over varying fill types are at a higher risk of differential movement compared to improvements over a uniform fill zone. 3. Demolition debris (asphalt and concrete) should be processed to maximum individual particle size of 3 inches and blended with on-site soils prior to reuse at a ratio of 50 percent asphalt or concrete debris to 50 percent soil. Imported soils should meet the following material property requirements: Gradation Percent finer by weight (ASTM C136) 3" 100 1" 90-100 %" 50-100 No. 4 Sieve 50-100 No. 200 Sieve 10-35 • Liquid Limit............................................................30 (max) • Plasticity Index........................................................10(max) • Maximum Expansive Potential (%).............................0.5* *Measured on a sample compacted to approximately 95 percent of the ASTM D698 maximum dry density at optimum water content. The sample is confined under a 200 psf surcharge and submerged. 4.2.3 Compaction Requirements Engineered fill should be placed and compacted in horizontal lifts, using equipment and procedures that will produce recommended moisture contents and densities throughout the lift. Item Fill lift thickness Description 8-inches or less in loose thickness when heavy, self-propelled compaction equipment is used 4 to 6-inches in loose thickness when hand-guided equipment (i.e. jumping jack, plate compactor) is used Compaction requirements 1,4 98% (below foundations) and 95% of the materials standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D698) Moisture content cohesive soils (clay) Moisture content cohesionless soils 0 to +3% of the optimum moisture content -3 to +3% of the optimum moisture content Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 10 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 lierracon Item Description (sand) 1. We recommend that engineered fill be tested for water content and compaction during placement. Should the results of the in-place density tests indicate the specified water or compaction limits have not been met, the area represented by the test should be reworked and retested as required until the specified water and compaction requirements are achieved. 2. Water levels should be maintained low enough to allow for satisfactory compaction to be achieved without the compacted fill material pumping when proofrolled. 3. Moisture conditioned clay soils should not be allowed to dry out. A loss of moisture within these materials could result in an increase in the materials' expansive potential. Subsequent wetting of these materials could result in undesirable movement. 4. Due to the potential varied nature of soils blended with properly processed demolition debris, additional testing methods may be required at the time of placement in order to determine acceptable compaction effort. 4.2.4 Excavation and Trench Construction Excavations into the subsurface soils will encounter a variety of conditions. Excavations into the sand fill materials and native sand soils will be subject to sloughing and caving, while excavations into the native clay soils can be expected to stand on relatively steep temporary slopes during construction. The individual contractor(s) is responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. All excavations should be sloped or shored in the interest of safety following local and federal regulations, including current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) excavation and trench safety standards. Soils penetrated by the proposed excavations may vary significantly across the site. The soil classifications are based solely on the materials encountered in the exploratory borings. The contractor should verify that similar conditions exist throughout the proposed area of excavation. If different subsurface conditions are encountered at the time of construction, the actual conditions should be evaluated to determine any excavation modifications necessary to maintain safe conditions. As a safety measure, it is recommended that all vehicles and soil piles be kept to a minimum lateral distance from the crest of the slope equal to no less than the slope height. The exposed slope face should be protected against the elements. 4.2.5 Grading and Drainage All grades must be adjusted to provide positive drainage away from the buildings during construction and maintained throughout the life of the proposed project. Infiltration of water into utility or foundation excavations must be prevented during construction. Landscaped irrigation adjacent to the foundation systems should be minimized or eliminated. Water permitted to pond near or adjacent to the perimeter of the structures (either during or post-construction) can result in significantly higher soil movements than those discussed in this report. As a result, any Responsive . Resourceful , Reliable 11 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 lierracon estimations of potential movement described in this report cannot be relied upon if positive drainage is not obtained and maintained, and water is allowed to infiltrate the fill and/or subgrade. Exposed ground should be sloped at a minimum of 5 percent grade for at least 10 feet beyond the perimeter of the buildings. Where possible, asphalt pavement or concrete flatwork should be sloped at a minimum of 2 percent beyond the building perimeters. Where Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or other requirements or existing site features limit the gradient, slopes on the order of % to 1 percent minimum are considered acceptable. Backfill against footings, exterior walls and in utility and sprinkler line trenches should be well compacted and free of all construction debris to reduce the possibility of water infiltration. After building construction and prior to project completion, we recommend that verification of final grading be performed to document that positive drainage, as described above, has been achieved. Flatwork will be subject to post construction movement. Maximum grades practical should be used for paving and flatwork to prevent areas where water can pond. In addition, allowances in final grades should take into consideration post-construction movement of flatwork, particularly if such movement would be critical. Where paving or flatwork abuts the structures, care should be taken that joints are properly sealed and maintained to prevent the infiltration of surface water. Where landscape or xeriscape areas are within 10 feet of the foundation systems, the areas shall have positive drainage away from the foundation that is not hindered by landscape edging, grade variations or vegetation. In addition, consideration should be given to snow removal practices that will minimize the stockpiling of snow in planter and landscaped areas adjacent to structural improvements. Planters located adjacent to the structure should preferably be self-contained. Sprinkler mains and spray heads should be located a minimum of 10 feet away from the building line. Where drip irrigation is located near the existing building, we recommend that drip irrigation systems be located at least 5 feet from the outside edge of the foundations. Roof drains should discharge on pavements or be extended away from the structure a minimum of 10 feet through the use of splash blocks or downspout extensions. 4.2.6 Earthwork Construction Considerations Upon completion of grading operations, care should be taken to maintain the moisture content of the subgrade prior to construction of foundations, floor slabs, pavements, etc. Construction traffic over prepared subgrade should be minimized and avoided to the extent practical. Construction traffic over processed clay subgrade will eventually reduce the moisture content and increase the density of the subgrade. Subsequent wetting of these materials will result in undesirable movement. The site should also be graded to prevent ponding of surface water on the prepared subgrades or in excavations. If the subgrade should become frozen, desiccated, saturated, or disturbed, the Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 12 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon affected material should be removed or these materials should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted prior to foundation or floor slab construction. Unstable subgrade conditions could be present below existing pavements/hardscape or develop during general construction operations, particularly if the soils are wetted and/or subjected to repetitive construction traffic. Should unstable subgrade conditions develop, stabilization measures will need to be employed. Options for subgrade stabilization can include removal of unsuitable material and replacement with approved fill material. An alternative can include the use of Mirafi HP370 geotextile (or approved equivalent) overlain by Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class 5 or 6 aggregate base course. The depth of aggregate base course will depend on the severity of unstable soils. Trees or other vegetation whose root systems have the ability to remove excessive moisture from the subgrade and foundation soils should not be planted next to the structures. Trees and shrubbery should be kept away from the exterior edges of foundations, a distance at least equal to their expected mature height. The geotechnical engineer should be retained during the construction phase of the project to observe earthwork and to perform necessary tests and observations during overexcavation operations, excavations, subgrade preparation; proof-rolling; placement and compaction of controlled compacted fills; backfilling of excavations into the completed subgrade, and just prior to construction of building floor slabs. 4.2.7 Soluble Sulfate Test Results The following table lists the results of laboratory soluble sulfate testing performed on samples obtained during our field exploration. These values may be used to estimate potential corrosive characteristics of the on-site soils with respect to contact with the various underground materials that will be used for project construction. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 13 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Boring No.Sample Depth (feet)Soluble Sulfatel (mg/l) 1 2 1 9 0-5 2 15 2 1 16 9 1 20 2 <1 30 2 <1 Pl 2 4 1. Results of soluble sulfate testing indicate that samples of the on-site soils have an exposure class of SO when classified in accordance with Table 4.2.1 of the ACI Design Manual. The results of the testing indicate ASTM Type I Portland Cement is suitable for project concrete in contact with on-site soils. However, if there is no (or minimal) cost differential, use of ASTM Type 11 Portland Cement is recommended for additional sulfate resistance of construction concrete. Concrete should be designed in accordance with the provisions of the ACI Design Manual, Section 318, Chapter 4. 4.3 Foundation Recommendations Based upon the results of the field exploration and laboratory testing program, the following foundation systems were evaluated for use in supporting the proposed buildings and parking garage: • Spread footings or post-tensioned slabs-on-grade on a zone of engineered fill. • Straight-shaft, cast-in-place piers/shafts constructed in bedrock. In our opinion, spread footings or post-tensioned slabs-on-grade may be constructed on a zone of new engineered fill materials provided the owner is willing to accept the risk of movement. If the owner is not willing to accept the risk of movement associated with spread footing or post- tensioned slabs-on-grade foundations or if building loads of the structures are high (as anticipated for the proposed garage), the proposed structures may be constructed on a drilled pier foundation systems bottomed in the underlying bedrock. 4.3.1 Spread Footing Design Recommendations The proposed buildings may be constructed on spread footing foundations bottomed on a minimum 3-foot zone of new engineered fill, provided the owner is willing to accept the associated risk of movement and all existing fill materials below each building footprint are removed and modified or replaced with imported fill materials. Native soils at the base of all excavations should be surface compacted with heavy, vibratory compaction equipment. Fill materials beneath foundations should be placed and compacted as outlined in the "Earthwork" section of this report; Terracon should be contacted to observe on a full-time basis. Design recommendations for a spread footing foundation system are presented in the following paragraphs. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 14 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Description Value Overexcavation/modification depth Minimum of 3 feet and all existing fill must be removed to native soils. Native soils at the base of all excavations must be surface compacted with heavy, vibratory compaction equipment. Supporting stratum New engineered fill Maximum net allowable bearing pressurel 2,000 psf Minimum dead load pressure N/A Void Thickness, if needed N/A Coefficient of friction (sliding)0.35 Minimum footing dimensions Isolated footings: 24 inches Continuous footings: 16 inches Minimum embedment below finished grade for frost 3 feetprotection 2 Approximate total movement from foundation loads3 About 1 inch3 Estimated differential movement from foundation loads 3,4 About 1/6 to % inch4 1. The recommended net allowable bearing pressure is the pressure in excess of the minimum surrounding overburden pressure at the footing base elevation. This pressure assumes that any existing fill or lower strength soils, if encountered, will be excavated and replaced with engineered fill. 2. For conventional perimeter footings, footings beneath unheated areas, and footings that will be exposed to freezing conditions during construction. Interior footings may bottom at a minimum depth of 12 inches below finished grade in heated areas. 3. Foundation settlement will depend upon the variations within the subsurface soil profile, the structural loading conditions, the embedment depth of the footings, the thickness of engineered fill, and the quality of the earthwork operations and footing construction. 4. Differential settlement is considered over a distance of about 40 feet. Differential movement between the apartment building and parking garage is estimated to be on the order of about 1 inch. Footings should be proportioned on the basis of equal total dead load pressure to reduce differential movement between adjacent footings. Additional foundation movements than those presented in the previous table could occur if water from any source infiltrates the foundation soils; therefore, proper drainage should be provided in the final design and during construction and throughout the life of the structure. Failure to maintain the proper drainage as recommended in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report will nullify the movement estimates provided above. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 15 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon 4.3.2 Spread Footing Construction Considerations Spread footing construction should only be considered if some foundation movement can be tolerated. Spread footing foundations should be constructed on a minimum 3-foot zone of new engineered fill consisting of modified on-site soils or imported materials. In addition to the zone of new engineered fill, all existing fill below each building footprint must be overexcavated to native soils, processed, moisture conditioned and recompacted and/or replaced with non-expansive imported fill materials. The native soils present at the base of all excavations should be compacted with heavy, vibratory compaction equipment prior to placement of new engineered fill. Unstable subgrade conditions may be encountered at the base of the footing excavations. Unstable surfaces will need to be stabilized prior to backfilling excavations and/or constructing spread footings. The use of angular rock, recycled concrete and/or gravel pushed into the yielding subgrade is considered suitable means of stabilizing the subgrade. The use of bi-axial geogrid materials in conjunction with gravel could also be considered and could be more cost effective. As an alternative, consideration could also be given to chemically treating the subgrade. Unstable subgrade conditions should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to assess the subgrade and provide suitable alternatives for stabilization. Stabilized areas should be proofrolled prior to continuing construction to assess the stability of the subgrade. The zone of new engineered fill and overexcavation of existing fill below footings should extend laterally beyond all edges of the footings at least 8 inches per foot of overexcavation depth below footing base elevation. The overexcavation should then be backfilled up to the footing base elevation with approved fill placed in lifts of 8 inches or less in loose thickness (6 inches or less if using hand-guided compaction equipment) and compacted to at least 98 percent of the material's standard effort maximum dry density (ASTM D698). The overexcavation and backfill procedure is described in the following figures. Elli=111= EllE'! Design Design 1 2/30 .i,-' W fi-mu- 2/3D T. TFooting Level j ' Footing Level 0- COMPACTED LEAN STRUCTURAL D CONCRETE FILL 11 Recommended Recommended Excavation Level 45 ·--4. - Excavation Level *EL*i i - i-11 -LEA=#ladri b Lean Concrete Backfill Overexcavation / Backfill NOTE: Excavations in sketches shown vertical for convenience. Excavations should be sloped as necessary for safety. The base of all foundation excavations should be free of water and loose soil prior to concrete placement. Concrete should be placed soon after excavating to reduce bearing soil disturbance. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 16 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Should the soils at bearing level become excessively dry, disturbed or saturated, or frozen, the affected soil should be removed prior to placing concrete. Footings, foundations and masonry walls should be detailed and reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movement. The use of joints at openings or other discontinuities in masonry walls is recommended. 4.3.3 Post-Tensioned Slab Design Recommendations Based on the soil conditions encountered, use of post-tensioned slabs is feasible for support of structures provided the slabs are constructed on native soils or new engineered fill, some potential for movement can be tolerated and: • Slabs are constructed on a minimum 3-foot zone of new engineered fill. • All existing fill below each building footprint is removed to native soils and replaced with properly moisture conditioned and compacted fill. • The post-tensioned slab foundations are properly designed and constructed. • Approved materials supporting the foundation are properly placed and compacted. • Proper surface drainage is maintained throughout the life of the structures. • Managed landscaping measures are used. In our opinion, provided the slabs are constructed on a zone of new engineered fill as discussed above, total foundation movements on the order of about 1 inch or less should be expected. As previously stated, all existing fill below each building footprint must be removed to native soils and replaced with properly moisture conditioned and compacted fill. Proper drainage should be provided on the design and during construction to reduce potential movement. Provided foundations are properly designed, foundation movements could result in periodic, and possibly seasonal, cosmetic distress to drywall, window frames, door frames and other features. We would anticipate that the frequency of distress and amount of movement would generally diminish with time provided proper drainage is established and/or maintained. If the amount of movement and potential distress discussed cannot be tolerated, the use of drilled pier foundations and structural floor systems should be considered. It should be noted that the presences of 1 to 2-foot steps within long spans of post-tensioned slabs could create a situation where the slabs at different elevations perform independently of one another unless the steps are properly reinforced and designed to tie the slabs together to act as one rigid structure. We strongly recommend that joints be designed within the full height of the structure of the building over each step in order to help the structure be capable of withstanding movements on the order of 1 inch or more. Responsive . Resourceful i Reliable 17 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Based on the subsurface conditions and the recommended modification of the on-site materials, post-tensioned slabs should be designed using criteria outlined by the Post-Tensioning Institute4 based on the following: Post-tensioned Slab Design Parameter Edge moisture variation distance, em Center Lift Condition (feet)Edge Lift Condition Center Lift Condition Differential soil movement, ym (inches) Edge Lift Condition PTI, Third Edition 9 5 1.8 1.2 Description Value Overexcavation/modification depth Maximum allowable bearing pressure (psf) on polyethylene sheeting Slab-subgrade friction coefficient, p on cohesionless soils Minimum of 3 feet and all existing fill must be removed to native soils. Native soils at the base of all excavations must be surface compacted with heavy, vibratory compaction equipment. 2,000 0.75 1.00 on cohesive soils 2.00 Post-tensioned slabs, thickened or turndown edges and/or interior beams should be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of the PTI and the American Concrete Institute (ACI). It should be noted that ym is the estimated vertical movement at the edges of a uniformly loaded slab. These are theoretical values that are used in the design of post-tensioned slabs-on-grade and do not represent the movements that would be expected from the actual loading conditions. As previously discussed, the use of post-tensioned slabs assumes that some potential movement and cosmetic distress is considered acceptable. If portions of the building's floor slab will be unheated, such as patios and entryways, consideration should be given to structurally separating these areas of the slab from the remaining interior portion of the slab. Exterior slab areas may be cantilevered portions of the slab that are subject to uplift from frost heave and swelling of the expansive soils, sometimes beyond those used for design, due to over watering of adjacent landscaped areas. Such movement in the exterior slabs can result in change in slab grade to the point where negative grade results and 4 post-Tensioning Institute,Design (and Construction) of Post-Tensioned Slabs-on-Ground,(2004, Third Edition). Responsive. Resourceful i Reliable 18 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon water ponds adjacent to the interior areas of the slab. Repairs of such conditions are difficult and costly, particularly if the floor slabs are post-tensioned slabs. Exterior slabs in unheated areas are subject to frost heave beneath the slab. Therefore, in design of the exterior slabs, potential movement from frost heave should be considered in the design. As the slabs are subject to frost development beneath the slab, the perimeter beams around exterior post-tensioned slabs need not be 36 inches in depth as frost protection is not possible. Masonry walls should be detailed and reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movement. The use of joints at openings or other discontinuities in masonry walls is recommended. 4.3.4 Post-Tensioned Slab Construction Considerations The above outlined movement estimates should also be considered as the potential amount of tilting of the structure that could be caused by non-uniform, significant wetting of the subsurface materials below the post-tensioned slab. Failure to maintain soil water content below the slab and to maintain proper drainage around the structure will nullify the movement estimates provided above. 4.3.5 Drilled Pier Design Recommendations Design recommendations for a drilled pier foundation system are presented in the following paragraphs: Description Value Minimum pier length 1 30 feet Minimum bedrock embedment 2 10 feet Maximum end-bearing pressure 20,000 psf Skin friction 3 1,500 psf Uplift force (tension due to soil uplift, kips)N/A Minimum pier diameter 18 inches or Length/Diameter < 30 Void Thickness NA 1. The required minimum length is from the finished floor elevation for the structure of the building. 2. Drilled shafts should be embedded into firm or harder bedrock materials. 3. Skin friction value is for firm or harder bedrock. Skin friction would not be applied to fill, overburden soils or weathered bedrock materials. 4. Movement on the order of less than M inch should be anticipated for the drilled piers, provided the piers and properly designed and constructed. Skin friction capacity provided may be used for compression and tension loading. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 19 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Description Value 5. The portion of the drilled piers that can resist the uplift force shown above must be (a) embedded in firm or harder bedrock and (b) be at least 15 feet below the top of the drilled pier. 6. Provided the minimum bedrock embedment is achieved, a minimum dead load is not necessary. 7. In accordance with IBC Section 1806.1, if design of the pier foundations is completed using allowable stress design (ASD) methods, the vertical bearing resistance may be increased by 1 /3 where used with the alternative basic load combinations that include wind or seismic loads that are described in IBC Section 1605.3.2. This 1/3 increase does not apply if design is completed using load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods. Increases also do not apply to the resistance of uplift loads, nor to the soil properties provided in this report for modeling the pier response to lateral loads, nor the resulting lateral pier deflection vs. applied load graph. 8. Shear rings at least 3 inches high by 3 inches deep should be installed at 16 inches on center within the bottom 10 feet of the shaft. Piers should be considered to work in group action if the horizontal spacing is less than three pier diameters. A minimum practical horizontal clear spacing between piers of at least three diameters should be maintained, and adjacent piers should bottom at the same elevation. The capacity of individual piers must be reduced when considering the effects of group action. Capacity reduction is a function of pier spacing and the number of piers within a group. The following table presents capacity reductions for closely spaced piers. Description Value Drilled pier spacing >3 diameters >2 to 3 diameters 1 to 2 diameters (center to center) Pier capacity reduction None 30 percent 50 percent 1. End bearing values do not need to be reduced for closely spaced piers, if bottom of piers are at the same elevation. To satisfy forces in the horizontal direction using the computer program LPile©, piers may be designed for the following lateral load criteria: Soil Layer Undrained Angle of Coeff. of Unit Weight Shear Internal Subgrade Strain, 850 (pcf)Strength Friction,Reaction, k (%) (psf)*(degrees)(pci) Sand soil 115 N/A 30 60 N/A 500-static Clay soils 110 150 0 0.007 200-cyclic 1,500-static Claystone 120 1,000 0 0.005600-cyclic * The claystone bedrock may be in modeled as a hard clay. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 20 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Lateral analysis should account for the center to center spacing and P-Y multiplier values per the following table: Pier center to center spacing P-multiplier, PM P-multiplier, PM P-multiplier, PM (in direction of loading)Row 1 Row 2 Row 3 and higher 3 x diameter 0.8 0.4 0.3 5 x diameter 1.0 0.85 0.7 The structural engineer should determine the reinforcement necessary for the piers. At a minimum, all piers should be reinforced full depth for the applied axial, lateral and uplift stresses imposed. We recommend a minimum reinforcement of at least 1 percent of the cross-sectional area of the pier. 4.3.6 Drilled Pier Construction Considerations Drilling to design depth should be possible with conventional single-flight power augers; however, very hard and potentially cemented bedrock layers could require the use of heavy-duty equipment. Due to the presence of groundwater, and potentially caving soils, temporary steel easing of the pier shafts and/or drilling slurry will likely be needed during pier installation and construction to reduce groundwater inflow and borehole collapse, and to properly drill and clean the piers prior to concrete placement. Groundwater should be removed from each pier hole prior to concrete placement. Pier concrete should be placed immediately after completion of drilling and cleaning. If pier concrete cannot be placed in dry conditions, a tremie should be used for concrete placement. Due to potential sloughing and raveling, foundation concrete quantities may exceed calculated geometric volumes. Pier-bearing surfaces must be cleaned prior to concrete placement. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe the bearing surface and shaft configuration. Pier easing should be anticipated due to the Presence of groundwater. Casing should be withdrawn in a slow continuous manner maintaining a sufficient head of concrete to prevent infiltration of water or caving soils or the creation of voids in pier concrete. Pier concrete should have a relatively high fluidity when placed in eased pier holes or through a tremie. Pier concrete with slump in the range of 5 to 7 inches is recommended for non-eased piers and a slump of 7 to 9 inches is recommended for eased piers. We recommend shear rings be installed at 16 inches on-center within the bottom 10 feet of the shaft. Shaft bearing surfaces must be cleaned prior to concrete placement. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe the bearing surfabe, shaft configuration and shear ring installation. Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 21 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Free-fall concrete placement in piers will only be acceptable if provisions are taken to avoid striking the concrete on the sides of the hole or reinforcing steel. The use of a bottom-dump hopper, or an elephant's trunk disdharging nearthe bottom of the hole where concrete segregation will be minimized, is recommended. The top of the piers should be cylindrical in shape. Forms may be necessary at the top of the piers in order to minimize the disturbance of the soils and to maintain a cylindrical shape. 4.4 Seismic Considerations Based on our subsurface exploration and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that the soils have a low risk of liquefaction. The following table presents the seismic site classification based on the 2015 International Building Code: Code Used Site Classification 2015 International Building Code (IBC) 1 D 1. In general accordance with the 2015 International Building Code 2. The 2015 International Building Code (IBC) requires a site soil profile determination extending a depth of 100 feet for seismic site classification. The current scope requested does not include the required 100 foot soil profile determination. The deepest borings of this exploration extended to a maximum depth of about 35 feet and this seismic site class definition considers that similar soil conditions exist below the maximum depth of the subsurface exploration. 4.5 Swimming Pool Design and Construction Recommendations An outdoor pool will be constructed for the proposed development. All existing fill below the proposed pool, if encountered, should be overexcavated, moisture conditioned, recompacted and/or replaced with on-site or imported soils. Consideration should be given to the use of a reinforced gunnite concrete for pool construction. This material can normally withstand relatively large soil movement without cracking. However, care should be taken during construction to waterproof the pool so that leakage will not occur. A drainage system should be provided beneath the pool. The drain should consist of a minimum 6-inch layer of clean gravel (minimum %-inch size) beneath the pool. The gravel layer beneath the pool should be sloped so that it will drain into tiles or perforated drainpipe. The layout of the perforated pipe should include at least one pipe running down the center of the pool lengthwise. Cross-connecting pipes, spanning with the pool, should be placed at 6-foot centers. The cross- connecting pipes should be joined to the center pipe with solid "tees" or "cross" connections. The center pipes should be sloped to a positive gravity outlet or sloped to a sump located in the equipment room, permitting pump discharge. The bottom of the excavation beneath the gravel layer and the pipe should be lined with an impervious membrane (polyethylene film or equal) to reduce potential moisture fluctuations in the Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 22 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016. Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon subgrade soils. Pressure relief valves should be provided in the base of the pool to prevent excessive uplift pressures from developing in the event of drain system failure. The soils that will support deck slabs around the pool could move with increasing moisture content. To reduce possible damage that could be caused by soil movement, we recommend: • Deck slabs be supported on fill with no, very low, expansion potential. The onsite clay soils will likely be suitable for this purpose. • Strict moisture-density control during placement of subgrade fill. • Placement of effective control joints on relatively close centers and isolation joints between slabs and other structural elements. • Provision for adequate drainage in areas adjoining slabs. • Use of designs which allow vertical movement between the deck slabs and adjoining structural elements. Fill, backfill and surface drainage in the pool area should be placed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the "Earthwork" section of this report. Grading should be provided for diversion of deck surface runoff away from the pool area. In no case should water be allowed to pond around the slab perimeter. 4.6 Interior Floors / Garage Floor Where buildings are constructed on spread footings or drilled piers (as anticipated for the proposed garage), slab-on-grade floors may be utilized for the interior floor systems, provided slabs-on-grade are constructed on native soils or new engineered fill, provided some slab movement can be tolerated. All existing fill must be removed and replaced with properly moisture conditioned and compacted fill below slabs-on-grade. If very little movement can be tolerated, structural floors, supported independent of the subgrade materials, are recommended. A minimum 12-inch crawlspace or void space should be used for structural floor construction. Conventional slab-on-grade construction on expansive soils, whether in their natural state or moisture-conditioned and recompacted to a certain depth will move. The severity and magnitude of movement will depend on the depth of treatment, the resulting expansion potential of these materials, and the circumstances causing future wetting. 4.6.1 Interior Floors / Garage Floor Design Recommendations For structural design of concrete slabs-on-grade, a modulus of subgrade reaction of about 100 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for point or limited area loads for slabs-on-grade supported on native soils or new engineered fill at this site. If the risk of some movement and distress is acceptable, additional floor slab design and construction recommendations are as follows: Responsive . Resourceful , Reliable 23 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon • Positive separations and/or isolation joints should be provided between slabs and all foundations, columns or utility lines to allow independent movement. • Control joints should be provided in slabs to control the location and extent of cracking. • Interior trench backfill placed beneath slabs should be compacted in accordance with recommended specifications outlined below. • For finished areas, the use of a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete slabs on grade that will be covered with wood, tile, carpet or other moisture sensitive or impervious coverings, or when the slab will support equipment sensitive to moisture. When conditions warrant the use of a vapor retarder, the slab designer and slab contractor should refer to ACI 302 for procedures and cautions regarding the use and placement of a vapor retarder. • Slabs-on-grade should not be constructed on frozen subgrade. • Other design and construction considerations, as outlined in Section 302.1 R of the AC/ Design Manual, are recommended. The required total thickness for the parking structure concrete pavement is dependent primarily upon the subgrade soil and upon traffic conditions. Based on the soil conditions encountered at the site, an effective modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 pci was used for pavement design. The design incorporated typical car and light truck traffic loading along with a maximum of 5 delivery trucks per day. The following minimum pavement thickness is recommended: Traffic Area Parking Garage Slab-on-grade Total Pavement Thickness, Portland Cement Concrete (inches) 6 Concrete for the slabs-on-grade for the parking level should be obtained from an approved mix design with the following minimum properties: • Modulus of Rupture @ 28 days 600 psi minimum • Strength Requirementi .......ASTM C94 Concrete for the garage slab/pavements should be obtained from an approved mix design. Concrete should be deposited by truck mixers or agitators and placed a maximum of 90 minutes from the time the water is added to the mix. Other specifications outlined by CDOT or the City of Wheat Ridge should be followed. Longitudinal and transverse joints should be provided as needed in concrete pavements for expansion/contraction and isolation. The location and extent of joints should be based upon the Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 24 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon final pavement geometry. All joints should be sealed to prevent entry of foreign material and doweled where necessary for load transfer. 4.6.2 Interior Floors / Garage Floor Construction Considerations The existing fill should be removed to native soils and replaced with properly moisture conditioned and compacted engineered fill to the specifications presented in the "Earthwork" section of this report. Additional floor slab movement could occur should the floor slab supporting soils be allowed to dry out and subsequently become rewetted, possibly resulting in potential excessive movement causing uneven floor slabs and severe cracking. Future wetting could occur due to over watering of landscaping, poor drainage, improperly functioning drain systems, and/or broken utility lines. Therefore, it is imperative that the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed. 4.7 Exterior Flatwork Exterior slabs-on-grade and exterior architectural features may be constructed on native soils or new engineered fill. Exterior slabs-on-grade constructed on existing fill may experience some movement due to the volume change of the material. We recommend all existing fill, where encountered, below exterior slabs-on-grade be overexcavated, properly moisture conditioned and compacted to grade. However if the owner is willing to accept a higher risk of movement (relative to removal of all existing fill) for exterior slabs, consideration could be given to mitigating a portion of the upper existing fill materials. Mitigation measures would consist of partial overexcavation of the existing fill materials to a depth of about 2 feet, moisture conditioning and recompaction or replacement with non-expansive imported soils. 4.7.1 Exterior Flatwork Design Recommendations For structural design of exterior concrete slabs-on-grade, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 pci may be used for point or limited area loads for exterior slabs-on-grade at this site. Additional slab design and construction recommendations are as follows: • Minimizing moisture increases in the backfill. • Controlling moisture-density during placement of backfill. • Positive separations and/or isolation joints should be provided between exterior slabs and the building to allow independent movement. • Control joints should be provided in slabs to control the location and extent of cracking. Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 25 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development n Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5,2016. Terracon Project No. 25165377 lierracon • Exterior slabs should not be constructed on frozen subgrade • Other design and construction considerations; as outlined in Section 302.1 R of the AC/ Design Manual, are recommended. 4.7.2 Exterior Flatwork Construction Considerations Movements of exterior slab-on-grades using the above technique will likely be reduced and tend to be more uniform. Additional movement could occur should the subsurface soils become wetted to significant depths, which could result in potential excessive movement causing uneven exterior slabs and severe cracking. This could be due to over watering of landscaping, poor drainage, and/or broken utility lines. Therefore, it is imperative that the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed. 4.8 Lateral Earth Pressures We anticipate site walls up to 6 feet in height may be necessary for development of the subject site. Reinforced concrete walls with unbalanced backfill levels on opposite sides should be designed for earth pressures at least equal to those indicated in the following table. Earth pressures will be influenced by structural design of the walls, conditions of wall restraint, methods of construction and/or compaction and the strength of the materials being restrained. Two wall restraint conditions are shown. Active earth pressure is commonly used for design of free-standing cantilever retaining walls and assumes wall movement. The "at-rest" condition assumes no wall movement. The recommended design lateral earth pressures do not include a factor of safety and do not provide for possible hydrostatic pressure on the walls. For active pressure movementS = Surcharge -0 4-(0.002 H to 0.004 H) S 1 1 1 For at-rest pressure No Movement Assumed Horizontal Finished Grade H Horizontal Finished Grade |5 [)2 ) 4 pi-)| -- Retaining Wall EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 26 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Earth Pressure Conditions Active (Ka) At-Rest (Ko) Coefficient For Equivalent Fluid Surcharge Earth Pressure, Backfill Typel Density (pcf)Pressure, pi (psf)P2 (psf) Granular - 0.33 35 (0.33)S (35)H Lean Clay - 0.47 50 (0.47)S (50)H Granular - 0.50 60 (0.50)S (60)H Lean Clay - 0.64 80 (0.64)S (80)H Granular- 3.0 400 --- Passive (Kp) Lean Clay - 2.1 275 --- 1. Granular materials are considered to be sands or gravels with a maximum of 20 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Applicable conditions to the above include: • For active earth pressure, wall must rotate about base, with top lateral movements of about 0.002 H to 0.004 H, where H is wall height • For passive earth pressure to develop, wall must move horizontally to mobilize resistance. • Uniform surcharge, where S is surcharge pressure • In-situ soil backfill weight a maximum of 120 pcf • Horizontal backfill, compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density • Loading from heavy compaction equipment not included • No hydrostatic pressures acting on wall • No dynamic loading • No safety factor included in soil parameters To control hydrostatic pressure behind earth-retaining walls we recommend that a drain be installed below the foundation of the wall with a collection pipe leading to a reliable discharge. If this is not possible, then combined hydrostatic and lateral earth pressures should be calculated for lean clay backfill using an equivalent fluid weighing 90 and 100 pcf for active and at-rest conditions, respectively. For granular backfill, an equivalent fluid weighing 85 and 90 pcf should be used for active and at-rest, respectively. These pressures do not include the influence of surcharge, equipment or floor loading, which should be added. Heavy equipment should not operate within a distance closer than the exposed height of retaining walls to prevent lateral pressures more than those provided. The preceding data are applicable only to cast-in-place concrete or modular block walls up to 6 feet in height. If taller single walls, tiered walls, or Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls will be included in the proposed development, additional site-specific studies and laboratory testing will be required. In addition, the wall designer should perform standard wall design practices including analysis for overturning, sliding, bearing capacity and global stability, and results of these analyses should be provided for our review. Additional sampling, laboratory Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 27 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon testing and document review associated with retaining walls is beyond the original scope of work but can be performed as a separate scope, for a separate fee. 4.9 Pavement Design and Construction Design of privately maintained pavements for the project has been based on the procedures outlined by the Asphalt Institute (Al) and the American Concrete Institute (ACI). Many of the recommendations included in this section are applicable to the design and maintenance of site sidewalks and other flatwork. Pavements and flatwork constructed on existing fill have a low to moderate risk of movement. The risk of movement can be reduced to a lower level if the subgrade materials are modified by overexcavating the materials to a depth of 2 feet and properly moisture conditioning and compacting suitable on-site soils to grade. 4.9.1 Design Traffic We assumed the following design parameters for Asphalt Institute flexible pavement thickness design: • Automobile Parking Areas • Parking stalls and parking lots for cars and pick-up trucks • Main Traffic Corridors • Parking lots • Subgrade Soil Characteristics • USCS Classification - SC, SC-SM (Poor to Medium Subgrade) We assumed the following design parameters for ACI rigid pavement thickness design based upon the average daily truck traffic (ADTT): • Automobile Parking Areas • ACI Category A-1: Automobile parking • Main Traffic Corridors • ACI Category B: Commercial entrance and service lanes • Subgrade Soil Characteristics • USCS Classification - SC, SC-SM • Concrete modulus of rupture value of 600 psi We should be contacted to confirm and/or modify the recommendations contained herein if actual traffic volumes differ from the assumed values shown above. 4.9.2 Subgrade Soils Based on a subgrade soil Unified Soil Classification of SC, SC-SM, Al classifies the subgrade soil as poor to medium. Native sand soils and sand fill will be encountered at pavement construction Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 28 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon elevation. Due to the presence of existing fill, we recommend overexcavating to a depth of at least 2 feet, moisture conditioning and recompacting the material to grade. 4.9.3 Recommended Minimum Pavement Sections and Materials Recommended alternatives for flexible and rigid pavements are summarized for each traffic area as follows: Preliminary Pavement Thickness (Inches) Traffic Area Asphalt Aggregate Portland Concrete Base Cement Total Surface Course Concrete Automobile Parking (Al Class I and ACI Category A) A 5-1/2 5-1/2 B 4 6 10 5 5 A 6-1/2 '6-1/2 Main Traffic Corridors (Al Class 111 and ACI Category B) B 5 8 13 6 6 1. The minimum pavement section thickness per ACI Each alternative should be investigated with respect to current material availability and economic conditions. A minimum 6-inch thickness of rigid reinforced concrete pavement is recommended at the location of dumpsters where trash trucks park and load, and in areas of tight turning radius. For analysis of pavement costs, the following specifications should be considered for each pavement component: Pavement Component Colorado Department of Transportation Criteria Asphalt Concrete Surface Aggregate Base Course Portland Cement Concrete Grading S or SX Class 5 or 6 Class P 4.9.4 Construction Considerations Site grading is generally accomplished early in the construction phase. However, as construction proceeds, the subgrade may be disturbed due to utility excavations, construction traffic, desiccation, or rainfall. As a result, the pavement subgrade may not be suitable for pavement construction and corrective action will be required. The subgrade should be carefully evaluated at the time of pavement construction for signs of disturbance or excessive rutting. If disturbance has occurred, pavement subgrade areas should be reworked, moisture conditioned, and properly compacted to the recommendations in this report immediately prior to paving. Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 29 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon We recommend the pavement areas be rough graded and then thoroughly proof rolled with a loaded tandem axle dump truck prior to final grading and paving. Particular attention should be paid to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed earlier and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Areas where unsuitable conditions are located should be repaired by removing and replacing the materials with properly compacted fills. All pavement areas should be moisture conditioned and properly compacted to the recommendations in this report immediately prior to paving. The placement of a partial pavement thickness for use during construction is not recommended without a detailed pavement analysis incorporating construction traffic. In addition, if the actual traffic varies from the assumptions outlined above, we should be contacted to confirm and/or modify the pavement thickness recommendations outlined above. 4.9.5 Pavement Performance Future performance of pavements constructed at this site will be dependent upon several factors, including: • Maintaining stable moisture content of the subgrade soils both before and after pavement construction. • Providing for a planned program of preventative maintenance. The performance of all pavements can be enhanced by minimizing excess moisture, which can reach the subgrade soils. The following recommendations should be considered at minimum: • Site grading at a minimum 2 percent grade onto or away from the pavements. • Water should not be allowed to pond behind curbs. • Compaction of any utility trenches for landscaped areas to the same criteria as the pavement subgrade. • Sealing all landscaped areas in or adjacent to pavements or provide drains to reduce the risk of moisture migration to subgrade soils. . Placing compacted backfill against the exterior side of curb and gutter. • Placing curb, gutter and/or sidewalk directly on subgrade soils without the use of base course materials. Preventative maintenance should be planned and provided for an ongoing pavement management program in order to enhance future pavement performance.Preventative maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration. Preventative maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g. crack sealing and patching) and global maintenance (e.g. surface sealing). Preventative maintenance is usually the first priority when implementing a planned pavement maintenance program. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 30 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016. Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS Terracon should be retained to review the final design plans and specifications so comments can be made regarding interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical recommendations in the design and specifications. Terracon also should be retained to provide observation and testing services during grading, excavation, foundation construction and other earth-related construction phases of the project. The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings performed at the indicated locations and from other information discussed in this report. This report does not reflect variations that may occur between borings, across the site, or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. If variations appear, we should be immediately notified so that further evaluation and supplemental recommendations can be provided. The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. Terracon's scope of services has been provided under the belief that the residential portion of this project will consist of apartments. As such, Terracon would like to inform the Client that if the apartment portion of this development is converted at any time to another purpose such as condominiums, the Client understands the services Terracon is providing is not applicable for a condominium project and that a separate consultant will need to be retained for such services. Terracon will have no liability for any such unintended use of our services. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. In the event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the project as outlined in this report are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 31 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Field Exploration Description The locations of borings are presented in Exhibits A-3 and A-4. The borings were located in the field by measuring with a measuring wheel from property lines and/or existing site features. The latitude and longitude coordinates of the boring locations were obtained by locating the borings on Google Earth and recording the values. The accuracy of the latitude and longitude values is typically about +/-25 feet when obtaining the values using this method. Elevations of the borings were obtained using a level and by assigning the rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site a temporary benchmark elevation of 100.0 feet. The accuracy of the boring locations and elevations should only be assumed to the level implied by the methods used. The borings were drilled with a CME-75 truck-mounted rotary drill rig with solid-stem augers. During the drilling operations, lithologic logs of the borings were recorded by the field engineer. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained at selected intervals utilizing a 3-inch outside diameter ring barrel sampler (RS). Penetration resistance values were recorded in a manner similar to the standard penetration test (SPT). This test consists of driving the sampler into the ground with a 140-pound hammer free-falling through a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the ring-barrel sampler 12 inches or the interval indicated, is recorded and can be correlated to the standard penetration resistance value (N-value). The blow count values are indicated on the boring logs at the respective sample depths, ring barrel sample blow counts are not considered N-values. An automatic hammer was used to advance the samplers in some of the borings performed on this site. A greater efficiency is typically achieved with the automatic hammer compared to the conventional safety hammer operated with a cathead and rope. Published correlations between the SPT values and soil properties are based on the lower efficiency cathead and rope method. This higher efficiency affects the standard penetration resistance blow count value by increasing the penetration per hammer blow over what would be obtained using the cathead and rope method. The effect of the automatic hammer's efficiency has been considered in the interpretation and analysis of the subsurface information for this report. The standard penetration test provides a reasonable indication of the in-place density of sandy type materials, but only provides an indication of the relative stiffness of cohesive materials since the blow count in these soils may be affected by the soils moisture content. In addition, considerable care should be exercised in interpreting the N-values in gravelly soils, particularly where the size of the gravel particle exceeds the inside diameter of the sampler. Groundwater measurements were obtained in the borings at the time of drilling. Due to safety concerns, borings were backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with asphalt, where applicable, after completion of drilling for this exploration. Some settlement of the backfill and patch may occur and should be repaired as soon as possible. Exhibit A-1 536 r 42*0 ... i ked ' r i t .iu 'Ry'.·py€'·2,?fif-1:,·19¢44-i-4,--i:Ut.wl-4 -.»'j>f· 0 *·s, 1 ---1 . · y...0/2 I • - '< - -- if S·Ii I 1.-:Shopping V /1 1twa-1 _ 077 .4 -J.-.=-4 1 €1 ! 1 4 .1 - -lf-1..i.- .1, fli Fri iN i _.lai..3*-La:k# 2 . I: F}....01-1'- ..( .==1_.../PO, - 7 '1'lit. 111 1 & -- . -- . A-41· -1. L...1*..i- 1. T 1 1 . ; 14 9-4% F.€9*-in*-N > 41&.e2--grid- RhoditEl q----4 . -.i .ft:t- ---4 ·Ph - I-akesiI*>·EAErS-entor1·- #.ru#· 1._-- .4.4-._2€.}-,9'7.. -3..TLTL.L. 1 93, p+11;, 2.3 ,,..:r -' t It,;1-·. 1 £-41 - Shoiping Center-7..3 1- T. 3 -F '-T-- T..4.11 .1 7-r j.·-F -1 -'--7- --i · Mk)0 9tliin}vie.* 1 2 ...9, . 1 6 1 -3244". TJwn I/21 . - -· 7._i 1.'1 14!1.- - i.-1-4:t- 1 1.-11. li.. 1, ts: 64.13441 LE+ :" -4,·Ii 1 1A I. 1 3 4 i. 47 'Of-.:.::E- 4 -,#1 1 1. - -- . 1 1-· DEr....1 4 1 - . ·· 1 ,1 1 I 1- - 14 1--,36 .... '32.-1.31. --2· ..-Whi Er-*#5,644 1 1 At 44/EY:|t1.hz,73 80}r,re j .3·1 ;4 7-*7 0. / 2 pl 1 1 ./--7299 ,C)< / ti (t. 1 -· '- 1 · I· ·, ' i . ..' i,; D 6--14*-4-144-Fi 1 ,{i- 1- i -Nk<J ..kk i .1 . 1.04 1-1 .1 -,4 1411 * 1 7 --tr 1,1 1 -14.6, 11/1 -1,) I ./- i i <f<+54(tu-.Lil_£213-LI·-11:-- -*.1. , -1 4.e=E&6,-*--Ittw.%,-f1 1£ 1 1 1 1 8 'll 111 + ..> .1 21 - I .[.': ·· . ' 14:··1··.r,4 - . _ 1-,· · 1I ii < •.Fifl.1--1 -'i t7* ·22.: .4'IRS*rvgy /-..1» '- V a'71£7·= --i ' L ' A 4, 124--Lah-4-1142.4....4...1.2-2 0,-4%40 -P It ; i'F e.i Ig ./.." , uffer»:1.Im,]berk E.·N . ,' · TUdi-FU A li MelIng,]21n · ,· waeG k.f---tli#44. P I f- 1 * -35 1 ..% 11...34..<11-:. 14.- -.44:L-i .3 ' 1:· - · '4·k·.9--1 1 ·2 3 . 1 ..t 1 ..1 i . 63«'·. -1... I Bki 1'- ii /,i: i i j il i C j 5 1 t .11 *02 l,• t t *AT-*ID *Ejq tj ,/SLIEH kff!. Elf {3(jff-,4 ..,j' r 341 / 7 Carie M/Dr e. i1 1 t . PNK J f W 1 bw-ater{.111©4 > 1 i; i 1 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QUADRANGLES INCLUDE: ARVADA, CO (1/1/1994) and FORT LOGAN, CO (1/1/1994). Project Manager:Project No. SBM 25165377 Drawn by:Scale: JNH 1"=2,000 Checked by:File Name: SBM A2 and A3 Approved by:Date: SBM 10/04/2016 lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-1729 153/9 ;PBrk ExhibitSITE LOCATION PROPOSED 38 TH &UPHAM MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT A-2 NORTHWEST OF W 38TH AVE, AND UPHAM ST. WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO -I m 121 62€ 4 77% k 111 1 Pr i i.2 ' A. i 4 L 11 . LEGEND Approximate Boring Location DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES 1 Temporary Benchmark: Rim of Bell System manhole cover in NW area of site. Assigned elevation = 100.0 feet.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS iager Project No. SBM 25165377 Scale: JNH AS SHOWN i: File Name: SBM A2 and A3 4: Date:SBM 10/04/2016 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-1729 AERIAL IMAGE EXPLORATION PLAN PROPOSED 38 TH & UPHAM MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT NORTHWESTOF W 38™AVE. AND UPHAM ST. WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 275 fl, Pcrkin 1-1 Resicenliol Resi 140.1 T 16*itness/Amenity ,4 117 91Retol Vectra Bank Pe:r Pa Guid ines -*14 id· 1 I .'· 41>,·1111£ -47' 4' 2 R U LEGEND Approximate Boring Location DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES 1 Temporary Benchmark: Rim of Bell System manhole cover in NW area of site. Assigned elevation = 100.0 feet.AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS nager:Project No. SBM 25165377 BORING LOCATION PLAN Scale: JNH AS SHOWN Ilerracon PROPOSED 38TH &UPHAM MIXED USE 0 SBM A4 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 File Name:DEVELOPMENT ¥ Date:NORTHWEST OF W 38™ AVE. AND UPHAM ST.Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-1729SBM10/04/2016 WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO BORING LOG NO. 1 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77054° Longitude: -105.07905° Approximate Surface Elev: 97.8 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 GRAPH NE E E ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, loose 4-3 -0.2 @ 12 100 , 500 psf, 4-5 18 1125- 90+/- 10.0 19.0 -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, strong petrol odor, brown to dark brown, stiff 88+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), with interbedded sand layers, light brown, medium stiff 5-5 0.0 @ 26 9710- ,500 psf, 3-3 22 10915- 79+/- CLAYSTONE,light brown to gray, firm to very hard 20- 16-19 +3.7 @ 24 103 , 500 psfi 50/7" 29 9625 50/11"30- 63+/-50/3"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 11 feet while drilling Boring Started: 8/31/2016lirraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 8/31/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-5 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 2 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77055° Longitude: -105.07878° Approximate Surface Elev: 97.4 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) ri-,9 ME *W R8 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI €190 - 35.0 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, brown, very loose - 3-3 12 103 3-2 19 1045- 88.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, strong petrol odor, greenish-brown to dark brown, stiff 10- 7-6 22 106 83.5+/- CLAYEY SAND (SC), with interbedded sand layers, fine to medium grained, brown, loose 15- 5-7 24 102 78,5+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, weathered to hard 8-14 23 103 20- 25- 15-22 +2.8 @ 23 105 , 500 psf / 50/7"30- 62.5+/-50/6"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion,abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/1/2016 Boring Completed: 9/1/2016 8 feet while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-6 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 3 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC ATTERBERGLOCATION See Exhibit A-2 -'%2 :2 2 2 LIMITSi 52 r 52 2 EN 44Latitude: 39.77055° Longitude: -105.07848°I < U.1 .r- -1 -1 tz DI-6& 2 90 2 25 & 9 LL-PL-PI51.U iI Approximate Surface Elev: 97.2 (Ft.) +/-8 4: B 66! 05 LL CO 8 OW*8 aDEPTHELEVATION (Ft.) 2 POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SO trace gravel and organics, fine grained, light brown, loose < 9-9 6 108 34.0 93+/- 9.0 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, very loose 5- 3-3 11 106 88+A LEAN CLAY (CL), with sand, trace gravel, light brown, stiff 10- 6-12 +0.8 @ 20 109 , 500 psf, 111111 -414.0 83+/- CLAYSTONE ,grayish-brown to light brown, weathered to ha d 15-7-12 19 105 13-28 21 10720- 10-24 25- 50/6" 30- Z35.0 62+/-50/7" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification iines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an elevation of 100.0 feet. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/1/2016 Boring Completed: 9/1/2016 None encountered while drilling 1brracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-7 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIG NAL REPORT. GED SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 4 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77053° Longitude: -105.07822° Approxmate Surface Elev: 97.2 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, light brown, medium denseK -< mm 3 1% ATTERBERG u.1 - 0 LIMITS5 6 0m me 1- -1 3 D 3% 2 LL-PL-PI& -0, U) 8 9m 15-9 9 111 540 93+/- /140 -35.0 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, very loose to loose 5-3-5 15 108 2-3 10- 83+/- CLAYSTONE, light brown to gray, weathered to medium hard 15- 9-20 +0.3 @ 23 93 , 500 psf, 14-26 20- 50/12" 20 10825- 30·-50/9"+0.5 @ 18 104 , 500 psf, 62+/-50/7"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for descMption of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additiona[ data (jf any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/1/2016 Boring Completed: 9/1/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Ddller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-8 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 5 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77041° Longitude: -105.07908° Approximate Surface Elev: 98.9 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) 44 //80 'rl Hill GRAPH mo ME R8 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, brown, loose - 3-4 18 102 27-17-10 5-5 5- 91+/- -=- 414.0 -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, strong petrol odor, gray to black, stiff 10-5-7 18 112 85+/- CLAYEY SAND (SCh with interbedded sand layers, fine to coarse grained, brown, medium dense 15-8-13 14 124 81+/- CLAYSTONE, light brown to gray, firm to medium hard 14-19 21 10720- 16-21 25- 18-2730- 64+A 50/8"35- Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-sltu, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttlngs upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an elevation of 100.0 feet WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 8 feet while drilling Boring Started: 8/31/20161IerraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 8/31/2016 Dfiller: Terracon Exhibit:A-9 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 6 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77042° Longitude: -105.07887° , Approximate Surface Elev: 97.8 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) F Z ME 4ER8 AnERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI / 8.0 14.0 618.0 -35.0 CLAYEY SAND (SCh trace gravel and organics, fine grained, light brown, loose - 4-5 15 107 4-55- 90+6 -= SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, strong petrol odor, grayish-brown to gray, stiff - 10- 4-6 23 103 84+/- LEAN CLAY (CL), with sand and interbedded sand layers, light brown, stiff 15- 4-6 25 106 80+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, firm to medium hard 16-22 25 104 20- 16-23 25- 50/8" 16 11530- 63+/-50/9" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any)elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 8/31/2016 Boring Completed: 8/31/20168 feet while drilling 1 Ferracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-10 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GED SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 7 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77042° Longitude: -105.07863° Approximate Surface Elev: 97.6 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) 44 '11+117 HdVMD E E ME 4W *8 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, light brown, very loose to loose 2-3 14 104 3-4 20 1045- 90.5+A _£14.0 -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, light brown, stiff 6-9 18 110 49-18-3110- 83.5+A CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to light brown, weathered to medium hard 15-10-18 +0.8 @ 17 109 , 500 psf, 16-29 23 10320- 50/11" 23 10425- 50/8" 30- 62.5+6 50/7"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations, WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None encountered while drilling Boring Started: 8/31/20161IerraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 8/31/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-11 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GED SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 8 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77041° Longitude: -105.07843° Approximate Surface Elev: 97,8 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) d 9 m2 M 2 4W RE ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-Pl 11+111 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics! fine grained, light brown, very loose to loose - 6-4 4 101 2-3 19 1025- 89+/- F140 -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, light brown, stiff 6-10 21 10610- 84+/- CLAYSTONE, light brown to grayish-brown, weathered to hard 15- 10-13 26 97 12-18 20- 15-29 19 107 25- 50/7"30- 63+/-50/6"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/1/2016 Boring Completed: 9/1/2016 None encountered while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-12 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 9 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77041° Longitude: -105.07823° Approximate Surface Elev: 97.7 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 POSSIBLE FILL - Sit-TY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), with gravel, fine grained, brown 95.5+A SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), with gravel, fine grained, light brown, ver·y loose to loose 3 8.0 -35 0 GRAPH ATTERBERG 2 s LIMms>0 >Illl- 1-€ Kr E a 2% 5 9%3 WE E WE %3% LL-PL-PI8 0%3% 3 4-4 9 103 23-18-5 3-3 5- 89.5+6 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, light brown, stiff 10-6-9 +0.1 @ 22 104 , 500 psf, 84.5+A CLAYSTONE grayish-brown to light brown, weathered to medium hard 15-10-12 22 105 15-24 18 110 20- 25-50/12"+4.3 @ 24 103 , 500 psf, 50/8" 30- 62.5+/-50/7"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/6/2016 Boring Completed: 9/6/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-13 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GOT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 10 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77028° Longitude: -105.07904° Approximate Surface Elev: 103.8 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 12.0 HdVHD Mi 98 ATTERBERG Ul - V LIMITSE WU 32 1-0£ r 28ul 3 JQ &@E 2% %2 LL-PL-PIU. 05 R CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, very loose to loose 3-7 16 104 28-16-12 3-35- 7-10 10- 92+/- 4544416.0 29.0 -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, slightly calcareous, strong petrol odor, brown to black, medium stiff 4-5 24 10415-.2- 88+/- FINE TO COARSE SAND (SP-SM), with silt and gravel, brown, medium dense 17-18 20- 17-20 25- 75+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, medium hard to hard 50/12" 16 10830- 69+/-50/6"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic ' Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an procedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/15/2016 Boring Completed: 9/15/2016 15% feet whi/e dn'Hing lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-14 BORING LOG NO. 11 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC 0S1 LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77028° Longitude: -105.07879° Approximate Surface Elev: 100.3 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, light brown to brown, medium dense an 97.5+/- ATTERBERG-0 LI|2 , €· LIMITS99 0 -mE y Ir = =Ul- 1- -:% 3 JEm O W J Elll I 2 LL-PL-pl CO 8 U kCE ac 11-10 6 111 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, loose 5-9-4 13 107 93.5+/- '}11111 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, calcareous, varies to clayey sand, layers of sand and gravel around 19 feet, - brown, medium stiff to very stiff - tllL 95 - 35.0 10-_-2 I 4-5 22 109 4-4 15- 81+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, weathered to 20- medium hard 17-14 -0.2 @ 12 127 , 500 psft 20-30 25- 50/9" 30- 65.5+/-50/8"35- Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an elevation of 100.0 feet. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/19/2016 Boring Completed: 9/19/2016 107 feet while dri#irig lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-15 PERCENT FINES TI"S BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 12 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77031° Longitude: -105.07845° Approximate Surface Elev: 99.7 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) GO EE WE ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI ·8.0 14.0 -35.0 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, light brown, loose - 8-7 5 97 4-5 14 102 5- 91.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, brown, medium stiff - 10- 3-6 22 104 85.5+/- CLAYSTONE, light brown to gray, weathered to medium hard 15- 8-12 +0.9 @ 23 104 , 500 psf, 14-24 21 10220- 15-30 21 104 25- 50/7"30- 64.5+6 50/9"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BelSee Appendx B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Star·ted: 9/2/2016 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-16 PERCEN I 1-INES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 13 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77028° Longitude: -105.0782° Approximate Surface Elev: 97.7 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) -1 4W 98 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI 290 i till. CLAYEY SAND (SC trace gravel and organics, fine grained, brown to light brown, loose - 7-6 5 100 4-6 12 1085- 88.5+/- ti 1,1, SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, calcareous, brown, medium stiff 10-4-5 21 103 83.5+/- CLAYSTONE ,grayish-brown to light brown, weathered to hard 15-7-10 21 20-14-18 +2.5 @ 19 109 , 500 psf, 50/11" 25- 50/9"30- Z35.0 62.5+/-50/6" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled withl auger cuttings upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an elevation of 100.0 feet. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/1/2016 Boring Completed: 9/1/2016 None encountered while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-17 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 14 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77021° Longitude: -105.07923° Approximate Surface Elev: 104.3 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) -1.-4,ASPHALT, {about 5 inches)»04* FILL - SILTY SAND (SM), trace gravel, fine to coarse grained, brown, loose 101.5+A ///160'Will 10>ff 1 95 22.0 -35.0 ATTERBERG 0 U.1 c LIMITS95 & 5* 7 y55 589% E 1.- a J 2 LL-PL-Pl i or CO o ow0 5-5 5 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, loose - 5-3-4 12 107 3-510- 5-6 19 114 33-16-17 15- 88.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, seems of sand,--SZ.slight petrol odor around 19 feet, brown, very stiff 85+/- FINE SAND (SP-SM), with silt, trace gravel, brown,20- medium dense 15-24 82.5+/- CLAYSTONE ,grayish-brown, firm to hard 25- a 20-21 +1.8 @ 23 104 , 500 psf, 50/6"30- 69.51/-50/7"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any)elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/15/2016 Boring Completed: 9/15/201617 feetwhile drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W 1 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-18 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 15 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC ATTERBERGLOCATION See Exhibit A-2 - d - G LIMITS U >0 »E wK FL 52 2 *3 4%Latitude: 39.77012' Longitude: -105.0789'E ME 44 1- d 3 wz 1*Sm mE *g LL-PL-PIIll 1-1-1-1 .rApproximate Surface Elev: 106.0 (Ft.) +A 0 %0 2 WE 0 8 ON >O coDEPTHELEVATION (Ft.)'11*SPHALT, (about 4 inches)K]5_5» FILL - CLAYEY SAND (Sm, with interbedded clay layers, : fine grained, dark brown to light brown, loose -:3.0 103+6 6-9 16 115 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, light brown, loose - 5- 5-9 9 112 6-8 12 11110- 94+/- 18.0 __24.0 -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, calcareous, strong petrol odor, brown to grayish-brown, stiff 6-9 25 9915- 88+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), calcareous, brown, stiff g 20- 5-6 -0.2 @ 30 93 , 500 psf, 82+/- CLAYSTONE,grayish-brown, firm 9-22 35 94 25- 30- 13-21 +2.1 @ 23 101 , 500 psf, 71+/-20-2635-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any)elevation of 100.0 feet- Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 19 feet while drilling Boring Started: 9/2/2016lierraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-19 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GOT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 16 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77017° Longitude: -105.07864° Approximate Surface Elev: 101.7 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) >0 > 94 '11 m% 5& 2 2%$ 24 5 98 3 LL ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-Pl CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, brown, loose - 6-9 7 96 5-6-6 -1.1 @ 8 99 , 500 psf, 93.5+A LEAN CLAY (CL), with sand, trace grave[, grayish-brown, stiff 10- 4-6 25 99 lillill ////2512.0 89.5+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, firm to medium hard 15- 11-19 +0.1 @ 19 95 , 500 psf, 13-2820- 50/11" 22 105 25- 13-2130- E 35.0 66.5+/-50/8"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4.inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/2/2016 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-20 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 17 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77019° Longitude: -105.07849° Approximate Surface Elev: 100.7 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) .CO 9 4 4W 98 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, loose 4-5 9 108 4-75- 93.5+/- LEAN CLAY (CL), with sand, trace gravel, calcareous, light brown, stiff - 6-7 26 9910- 11'Ill4»% 4.0 86.5+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, firm to medium hard 15-16-24 +1.1 @ 22 102 , 500 psf, 17-23 20- 50/10" 25- 15-3030- - ' 50/11"Z35.0 65.5+6 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion, See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an elevation of 100.0 feet. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None encountered while drilling Boring Star·ted: 9/19/20161IerraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 9/19/2016 Diller: Terracon Exhibit:A-21 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 18 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77008° Longitude: -105.0792° Approximate Surface Elev: 105.9 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) 1-«ASPHALT, (about 5 inches)R&56 , I FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained,104+A-ldark grayish-brown CLAYEY SAND (SCh trace gravel, fine grained, light brown. loose 8- t.¥ , CD Ul%8 & %2 9 859C y U.11- 1-2% E ZE M *222WE n <00 .. 113,8 3 0 5-6 11 ATTERBERG C LIMITS t= 2. 9 LL-PL-PI O111R 109 4-65- 99+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CLL brown, stiff 12.0 20.0 22.0 -35.0 10- 5-6 0.0@ 13 120 1 500 psf, 94+A SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, calcareous, strong petrol odor around 14 feet, gray to black, stiff - 5-7 19 110 15-.2 . 7-886+A 20-FINE SAND (SP-SM). with silt. brown 84+/- CLAYSTONE ,grayish-brown, firm to medium hard 1 11-19 24 10325- 12-2430- 71+/-50/7"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for descr'iption of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/15/2016 Boring Completed: 9/15/2016 15>.feet while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-22 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 19 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC 9.5 414.C 351 LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 .(10 Latitude: 39.77027° Longitude: -105.07859°5 Lut- =% Approximate Surface Elev: 105.9 (Ft.) +/-0 3% DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) |a-hASPHALT, (about 6 inches)/10,4.4 2 0 FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine grained, brown 104+/- CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, calcareous, fine grained, light brown to brown, loose ATTERBERG2 E· LIMITSE F= =a 1- a 3 t! JQ g LL-PL pl- KLL (0 8 9 3-5 12 111 5-6 11 1095- 96.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), calcareous, brown, stiff 10- 4-6 0.0 @ 19 107 , 500 psf, 92+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown, weathered to hard 10-13 21 10415- 14-26 20- 50/10" 20 10625- 50/6" 30- 0 71+6 50/7" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an procedures and additional data Of any)elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None encountered while drilling Boring Started: 9/2/2016lirraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 Diller: Terracon Exhibit:A-23 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GED SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 20 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC ki:i. R*$ LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.77008° Longitude: -105.0784° Approximate Surface Elev: 101.3 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.)' -ll*SPHALT, (about 4 inches)/\101» ; POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SO, with interbedded clay layers, fine grained, light brown, loose :3.0 98.5+A C 9me n 5 64&% 3 Ed d twEm =3 RE-1 98 21 0 5-7 8 AUERBERG c LIMITS t= 2. & 62 LL-PL-PI O LUB 105 CLAYEY SAND (SCh fine grained, light brown, ver·y loose 2-2 9 108 5- 93.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CLL, trace gravel, light brown, medium stiff - 10- 4-4 25 102 88.5+/- CLAYSTONE, light brown to grayish-brown, firm to medium hard 15- 9-21 +0·9 @ 24 95 , 500 psf, 50/9" 20 108 20- 14-26 25- 30-50/9"+3.8 @ 21 108 , 500 psf, 66.5+A 14-27 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/6/2016 Boring Completed: 9/6/2016 None encountered while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W 1 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-24 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 13.C -35.C BORING LOG NO. 21 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 .CO dz >0 Latitude: 39.77005° Longitude: -105.07815°b LU H- E 2% Approximate Surface Elev: 99.7 (Ft.) +A 0DEPTHELEVATION (Ft.) $ POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine to medium $ grained, light brown, loose §3.0 96.5+/- ATTERBERG 2 LIM]TS08 2 -g E &!-hi- Z - LU J ME JQ-1 9@ M &2 %8 LL-PL-PI-1 1&!u cO B R1 7-10 6 105 12.0 CLAYEY SAND (SCL, trace gravel, fine to medium grained, light brown, loose 5- 5-4 6-6 18 111 26-14-1210- 87.5+A CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, weathered to hard 9-17 23 9815- 15-2520- 50/11" 14 11225- 15-23 30- .35.0 64.5+/-50/6"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in tile northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols andl Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Star·ted: 9/2/2016 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 None encountered while drilling lirracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-25 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 22 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC ljJ 'i *4012.C 21.C -35.1 LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.76991° Longitude: -105.07921° Approximate Surface Elev: 106.1 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) 4££+SPHALT, (about 5 inches)hon--58, : POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine grained, brown to light brown, loose :3.0 103+A ATTERBERG-19 LU 2 g LIMITSNO 9 1-55 1 RE € mr 923 W DLEO cowfc 0-2% &9 LL-PL-pl . 8 awLL98 85 3-5 7 111 CLAYEY SAND (SU, fine grained, light brown, loose 101+A 5 -8-9 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), brown, stiff 6-6 16 117 10- 94+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), strong petrol odor around 14 feet, seams of sand around 19 feet, gray, stiff V 7-1115- 5-8 26 10020- 85+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, firm to medium hard 21-23 22 10725- 16-20 28 30- 0 71+A 50/8" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with asphall upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/15/2016 Boring Completed: 9/15/2016 14 feet while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-26 PERCENT FINES 11"9 BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 23 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado ED LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 J* U.19 2 EP b 16 -g Latitude: 39.76988' Longitude: -105.0788°r -'< -I2 m MAW M9% E Approximate Surface Elev: 106.0 (Ft.) +A a %@ E WE AnERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 Un ASPHALT, (about 6 inches)/10*.4 , I POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine grained,104+A-7brown CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine grained, light brown, loose 5.0 44 -35.0 U v. 4-5 12 106 101+/- CLAYEY SAND (SO, with gravel, fine to coarse grained, brown to dark brown, loose 5- 6-9 9-6 10- 93+/- CLAYSTONE, light brown to grayish-brown, firm to ver·y hard - 15-13-27 +3.1 @ 23 104 , 500 psf, 17-25 18 111 20- 18-3025- 50/12" 30·- 71+/-50/5'35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: , See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laborator'y System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None encountered while drilling Boring Started: 9/15/20161IerraconDrill Rig]: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 9/15/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-27 PERCENT FINES Tim BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 24 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.76992° Longitude: -105.07861° Approximate Surface Elev: 104.8 (Ft,) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) FILL - SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine to medium grained, brown2.0 103+A / SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained, light brown, loose ATTERBERG-0 1.11 2 42 LIMITS91 2 L ERLul- 1-i Ek- 2-1- -1*% 4 9066! af * 2§ LL-pi-pl 0 8°34 6-7 9 112 22-16-6 6-75- 1/8.0 97+/- -35 0 CLAYEY SAND (SC), with gravel and interbedded clay layers, fine to coarse grained, brown, loose - 10-5-7 17 114 91+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to light brown, firm to medium hard 15- 17-27 +1.3@ 19 108 , 500 psf, 14-2820- 14-19 23 103 25- 50/11" 30- 70+/-50/7"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/6/2016 Boring Completed: 9/6/2016 None encountered while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-28 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 U.,UW BORING LOG NO. 25 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.76998° Longitude: -105.07828° Approximate Surface Elev: 101.0 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 8.0 2512.0 HdVMD leif) M2 4W 98 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and interbedded sand lenses, fine grained, light brown, medium dense 9-10 4 101 10-16 5- 93+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), light brown, medium stiff 4-5 22 10610- 89+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, weathered to medium hard - 9-15 21 9615- 15-27 23 10320- 12-25 25- 30-15-26 +2.2 @ 20 103 , 500 psf, E35.0 66+/-50/11" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell See AppendTx B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None encountered while drilling BoMng Started: 9/2/20161IerraconDAN Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-29 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID !F SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 26 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.76984° Longitude: -105.07846° Approximate Surface Elev: 104.5 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 5 FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, < dark brown, medium dense >4.0 100.5+A ATTERBERG -0 LU95 0 -2 € LIMITS LU 1- 1-NE £ Er r ga3 lDF m & @E * 3% 829 LL-PL-PILU 3% 3 CO 8 0% 14-24 4 'i tj/7 CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine grained, light brown, medium dense 5-10-10 97.5+/- -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL). calcareous. brown. medium stiff 4-5 20 109 10- 90.5+/- CLAYSTONE,grayish-brown to gray, weathered to medium hard 15-12-15 25 100 20- 15-19 +5.3 @ 24 102 , 500 psf, 19-3125- 18-2830- 69.5+/-50/7" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevatjon of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BoMng Started: 9/19/2016 Boring Completed: 9/19/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-30 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL- REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 27 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC ATTERBERGLOCATION See Exhibit A-2 J U.12 95 9:co -2 , 9 LIMITS Latitude: 39.76989° Longitude: -105.07817°E LU 1- 1-U.1 5 £Er Es2 9% 6 5# M 3% ke LL-PL-PI3 #FF ]% WE Q Approximate Surface Elev: 101.3 (Ft.) +A 0 <U) 5 0 0 0%*8 a O DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and organics, fine grained, brown, loose - 3.0 98.5+/-6-9 -1.7 @ 4 102 , 500 psffCLAYEY SAND (SCL, trace gravel, fine grained, light brown, loose 6-7 5 1135- //8.0 -350 93.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, calcareous, light brown, stiff - 10-6-8 20 110 89.5+6 CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, weathered to hard 10-16 21 10415 16-32 20- 25-15-29 +3.3 @ 19 110 , 500 psf, 15-3030- 66.5+/-50/6"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/2/2016 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-31 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 28 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC kIWU LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.76974° Longitude: -105.07847' Approximate Surface Elev: 104,2 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) $ POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SCL trace gravel and < organics, fine grained, brown to light brown, medium dense 13.0 101+/- ATTERBERG 0 Ill c V LIMITS*6 & 52 E ME GA 1- J J LUZ DI-9% 2 *9 2 2 LL-PL-PlEd EW %I 66! oc588 2 u. 0 8 0% >O 0 9-10 8 101 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, light brown, loose 5-9-9 5 100 97+/- 12.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), with gravel, grayish-brown, stiff 10- 7-9 -0.1 @ 18 110 , 500 psfi 92+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, weathered to hard 1 12-16 24 96 15- ' 20·- 16-21 +2.0 @ 22 99 , 500 psf, 1 15-21 25- - 50/9" 20 101 30- E35.0 69+/-35-50/5" Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/2/2016 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 None encountered while drilling lirracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-32 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 'VvVVV< PERCENI HNES BORING LOG NO. 29 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.76976° Longitude: -105.07815° Approximate Surface Elev: 101.7 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 U)ga E de 4W RE ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI 1¥S 00004 < POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SCL, trace gravel, fine grained, dark brown, loose - - < - - 5- - - 98.0 93.5+/- 8-6 6 99 5-9 8 SANDY LEAN CLAY (Cla, trace gravel, calcareous, light brown, stiff -4-7 22 10310- 89+/--2 CLAYSTONE ,grayish-brown to gray, weathered to firm - 15-9-12 +0.6 @ 22 104 , 500 psf, 13-17 22 105 20- 14-22 22 104 25- 17-26 30- -35.0 66.5+/-21-28 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an elevation of 100.0 feet. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Bor·ing Started: 9/2/2016 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 121/. feet while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-33 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. 30 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC g LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 JER LU 2 0 Latitude: 39.76967° Longitude: -105.07823°E E @% 9% Approximate Surface Elev: 102.5 (Ft.) +A EECD DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel and M 94.5« organics, fine grained, brown to light brown, loose - IX 4-4 5-6-6 LEAN CLAY (CL), with sand, calcareous, light brown, stiff 2.0 -10- 9-6 90.5+A ATTERBERG LIMITS6 ,-9 z m@ %3 J NUJ J'I t 62 Q LL-PL-PI CD 9 103 -0.8 @ 8 109, 500 psf, 22 104 CLAYSTONE, light brown to gray, weathered to medium hard - 15-_ X 8-16 22 106 20-11-22 25- 12-26 +3.1 @ 23 101 , 500 psf, 15-33 21 11230- E 35.0 67.5+/-35-X 50/7" Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data Of any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None encountered while drilling Boring Started: 9/2/2016lirraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-34 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM OR G NA REPORT. GEO SMART OG NO WE L 25165377.GP TERRACON20 5.GDT 0/5/16 BORING LOG NO. 31 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exh bit A-2 Latitude: 39.76956° Longitude: -105.07832° Approximate Surface Elev: 103.7 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 gE 34 4W 98 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI : POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SCL fine grained, light WVVI 2529< _ brown 101.5+/-X3Ae>V< 2.0 1lIll1 CLAYEY SAND (SC), fine grained, light brown, loose 7-7 5 106 5-8 7 1125- 96.5+/- LEAN CLAY (CL), with sand, calcareous, light brown, stiff 2 6-6 21 10710 5-515- 17.0 86.5+/- CLAYSTONE ,light brown to gray) weathered to hard 20-13-19 +0.5 @ 24 105 , 500 psf, 6-10 25 9925- 16-2130- -35.0 68.5+/-50/6" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch solid stem auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with auger cuttings upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field procedures See Appendix B for description of laboratory procedures and additional data (if any). See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. Notes: Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the Bell System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site an elevation of 100.0 feet. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 10 feet while drilling Boring Started: 9/2/2016lierraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Boring Completed: 9/2/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-35 T}"S BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 PERCENT FINES //10 gn'll. BORING LOG NO. 32 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.76955° Longitude: -105.07811° Approximate Surface Elev: 102.4 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 POSSIBLE FILL - SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained, brown 100.5+A SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained, light brown, loose 0 ATTERBERG.U) LU Gr LIMITS98 & Er a ., Z-- 6 E & 9% 1 1- --1 3 Pi JQX6 J 2 LL-PL-PWWE &u. 0 8 0398 3 5-7 20-16-4 6-7 8 1065 95.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), trace gravel, calcareous, light brown, stiff V 5-6 19 109 10- 15- 6-9 -0.2 @ 24 106 , 500 psf, 18.0 84.5+/- CLAYSTONE, grayish-brown to gray, firm to hard 15-17 23 10320- ' 21-20 25- 30-14-23 +4.6 @ 23 104 , 500 psf, =35.0 67.5+/-50/6"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and BoMng backfilled with auger cuttings uponn completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/2/2016 Boring Completed: 9/2/20169 feet while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-36 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 BORING LOG NO. Pl Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC 8 LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 ATTERBERG MZ &1 2 E ti LIMITS9 - >0 >E2Q Latitude: 39.77007° Longitude: -105.07942°1- J 3 0 52I 2 LL-PL-pl1 Approximate Surface Elev: 105.5 (Ft.) +/- 0 8 a 26 DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) 3,ASPHALT, (about 4 inches)/532 FILL - SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), fine grained, dark brown to brown, loose - ) 102.5+A X 4-6 9 110 22-16-6 SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), fine grained, light brown, loose - br:.5.0 100,5+/- 5 X 3-7 14 104 Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch solid stem auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning to rim of the BellSee Appendix B for description of laboratory System manhole cover in the northwest area of the site anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Stalled: 9/15/2016 Boring Completed: 9/15/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165377 Exhibit:A-37 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/5/16 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon Laboratory Testing Description Samples retrieved during the field exploration were returned to the laboratory for observation by the project geotechnical engineer, and were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System and the Description of Rock Properties presented in Appendix C. At this time, an applicable laboratory-testing program was formulated to determine engineering properties of the subsurface materials. Following the completion of the laboratory testing, the field descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary, and the Boring Logs were prepared. The Boring Logs are included in Appendix A. Laboratory test results are included in Appendix B. These results were used for the geotechnical engineering analyses and the development of foundation, earthwork and pavement recommendations. All laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with the applicable local or other accepted standards. Selected soil and bedrock samples were tested for the following engineering properties: • Water content •Atterberg limits • Dry density •Swell/consolidation • Grain size distribution •Water soluble sulfate content Exhibit B-1 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST -s 1 M 64110 10 8 6 4 2 OC - -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, paf WC, % / 1 2-3 ft CLAYEY SAND (SC)100 12 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Opham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-2 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI STRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTM 64340 10 8 6 4 2 0/4- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, paf WC, % / 1 9-10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 97 26 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-3 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTM [,4340 10 8 6 4 2 M< OC -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % / 1 19-20 ft CLAYSTONE 103 24 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-4 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AX'Al STRAIN % SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST Me I IVI 1.e,u 10 8 6 4 2 0- 0.-----N. -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, paf WC, % / 2 24 - 25 ft CLAYSTONE 105 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-5 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 A)(lai STRAIN 0/A SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTM 54340 10 8 6 4 2 OCI--/6- -2 -4 -6 -8 10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification '&,pef WC, % O 3 9-10 ft LEAN CLAY (CL)109 20 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-6 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI STRAIN O/. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST M& 1 1.1 L".J.U 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1;, pef WC, % 0 4 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 93 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-7 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST .S I M 54340 10 8 6 4 2 -2 \ -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, paf WC, % O 4 29 - 30 ft CLAYSTONE 104 18 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-8 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AX'Al STRAIN O/n SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM [„.-u 10 8 6 4 2 OC ----0- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 3, pef WC, % / 7 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 109 17 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-9 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. Te_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI STRAIN O/. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST Md I IVI W'+JI+V 10 8 6 4 2 oc - -2 1 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, pcf WC, % .9 9-10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)104 22 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-10 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST Ad I IVI WIJIV 10 8 6 4 L 2 N i -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, pef WC, % / 9 24 - 25 ft CLAYSTONE 103 24 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-11 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AY'Al RTRAIN O/. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST M U 1 1.1 L."Np,u 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, paf WC, % / 11 19-20 ft CLAYSTONE 127 12 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-12 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAL STRAIN % SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ..1 1 M 64340 10 8 6 4 2 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, paf WC, % / 12 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 104 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-13 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI RTRAIN O/. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST -al M [,4340 10 8 6 4 2 0- . -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % O 13 19-20ft CLAYSTONE 109 19 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-14 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAtN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTM C.-0 10 8 6 4 2 0/A#- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, paf WC, % O 14 24 - 25 ft CLAYSTONE 104 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lirracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-15 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI QTRAIAI 0& SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTM (4346 10 8 6 4 2 -2 \ -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % 0 15 19-20 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL) 93 30 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-16 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN % SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST MU I IVI L.aNP·+U 10 8 6 4 2 \ -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, pef WC, % O 15 29 - 30 ft CLAYSTONE 101 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-17 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN % SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOT[.1 54340 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, paf WC, % / 16 4-5 ft CLAYEY SAND (SC) 99 8 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-18 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAL STRAIN 0/. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST Ad 1 1.1 W.-6 10 8 6 4 2 094* -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 16, pef WC, % / 16 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 95 19 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-19 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI QTWAIN O/- SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST MO I IVI L.,-+J•,6 10 8 6 4 2 OC-- -2 . -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, paf WC, % / 17 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 102 22 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-20 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI STRAIN O/n SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM 04140 10 8 6 4 2 oc- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 11, pef WC, % O 18 9-10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)120 13 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-21 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN % SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST p.3 1 M [,4340 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % / 19 9-10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)107 19 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-22 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI STRAIN ok SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTM 54340 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, pcf WC, % O 20 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 95 24 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-23 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 01 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ,O 1 M 54340 10 8 6 4 2 \ \ -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification '&,pef WC, % O 20 29 - 30 ft CLAYSTONE 108 21 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-24 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI mTRAIN 01 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST PU} 1 IVI L,AU 10 8 6 4 2 1-& \. -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, pef WC, % 0 23 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 104 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge: CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-25 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI ATRAIN 01 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST .al M r,4340 10 8 6 4 2 OC -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, pcf WC, % O 24 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 108 19 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partner·s, LLC EXHIBIT: B-26 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 01 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ,to i iwiw.,40 10 8 6 4 2 0.-----i. -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, paf WC, % O 25 29 - 30 ft CLAYSTONE 103 20 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-27 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI ATRAIN ok SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTIVI [,4340 10 8 6 4 2 1 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % / 26 19-20 ft CLAYSTONE 102 24 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-28 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377,GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI ATRAIN O/6 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST MO 1 1/ WI/4/ 10 8 6 4 2 OC_________ -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % / 27 2-3 ft POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC)102 4 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-29 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST -j 1 M [,4J40 10 8 6 4 2 OC-- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % / 27 24 - 25 ft CLAYSTONE 110 19 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-30 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST AOTM C4J40 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 X. -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 04, paf WC, % O 28 9 - 10 ft ·SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)110 18 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-31 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377,GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI QTRAIN 0/A SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST Ad I IVI Wit-»*U 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification lk, pef WC, % O 28 19-20 ft CLAYSTONE 99 22 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-32 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AYIAI ATRAIN O/. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST Mal M 54340 10 8 6 4 2 OC -0-- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, paf WC, % / 29 14-15 ft CLAYSTONE 104 22 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-33 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC CONSOL STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAL STRAIN °4 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST p.3 1 M [,4340 10 8 6 4 2 oc - -2 --a -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1, pef WC, % O 30 4-5 ft POSSIBLE FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC)109 8 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-34 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AY[Al QTRAIN 0/. SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST -J I M [,4340 10 8 6 4 2 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification la, pef WC, % O 30 24 - 25 ft CLAYSTONE 101 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-35 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN VA SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST .J I M [,4340 10 8 6 4 2 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, pef WC, % O 31 19-20 ft CLAYSTONE 105 24 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-36 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST -0 1 M D4110 10 8 6 4 2 01:_ 1 -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 11, pef WC, % O 32 14-15 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)106 24 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-37 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 01 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST Mul 1.1 L...,+U 10 8 6 4 2 \ \ -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 1;, pef WC, % 0 32 29 - 30 ft CLAYSTONE 104 23 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf. PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado lierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-38 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 01 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTM D422 / ASTM C136 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 100 140 200 .I I\1\M 60 i \ \\/ i >- 55 \\\Eu.1 50 Z 4 \,IL A 45 Z LU · *40 f 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse medium fine Boring ID Depth USCS Classification AASHTO Classification LL PL PI Cc CU 0 5 2-3 CLAYEY SAND (SC)A-4 (2) 27 17 10 m 7 9-10 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL)A-7-6 (18) 49 18 31 A 9 0-5 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND with GRAVEL A-2-4 (0) 23 18 5 (SC-SM) * 10 2-3 CLAYEY SAND (SC)A-6 (1) 28 16 12 Boring ID Depth Dioo [)60 [)30 [)10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 5 2-3 4.75 0.11 0.0 52.9 47.1 m 7 9-10 9.5 1.8 32.4 65.8 . 9 0-5 37.5 0.274 25.7 42.6 31.7 * 10 2-3 4.75 0.135 0.0 60.8 39.2 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave, and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-39 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GRAIN SIZE: USCS & AASHTO COMBINED 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 4 2 1 1/2 3 5063153/4 40 60 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 65 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 100 10 1 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTM D422 / ASTM C136 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 4 6.10.16 30638 14 50 100204060 140 100 i 1 11 95 90 200 85 80 75 70 65 JO 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 100 10 1 960 ill 55 50 IL 1- 45 Z LU O In tir 1 Of -ru LLI : i \\\ M \ \E 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse medium fine Boring ID Depth USCS Classification AASHTO Classification LL PL PI Cc CU 0 14 14 - 15 CLAYEY SAND (SC)A-2-6 (1) 33 16 17 Z 21 9-10 CLAYEY SAND (SC)A-6 (2) 26 14 12 A 24 0 - 5 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM)A-2-4 (0) 22 16 6 * 32 2 - 3 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM)A-2-4 (0) 20 16 4 Boring ID Depth D100 060 030 D10 %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay 14 14-15 12.5 0.263 2.8 63.0 34.3 21 9-10 9.5 0.131 1.3 50.4 48.2 A 24 0 - 5 25 0.233 0.075 5.1 65.0 29.9 * 32 2-3 19 0.285 0.108 2.6 75.9 21.5 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-40 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL R EPORT. GRAIN SIZE: USCS & AASHTO COMBINED 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTM D422 / ASTM C136 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 6 100 I 4 3 2 1.5 1 314 1/2 2/3 3 4 6 810 1416 20 30I o I t.1 40 50 60 100 140 200 95 : : i 90 : : \E: 4 85 80 : it75 70 65 SE E 60 R 55 CE 50 LL 1- 45 40 Mi 35 \ 30 * : .. 25 20 15 10 5 0 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse medium fine Boring ID Depth USCS Classification AASHTO Classification LL PL Pl Cc CU / Pl 2 - 3 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM)A-2-4 (0) 22 16 6 Boring ID Depth D100 060 830 Dlo %Gravel %Sand %Silt %Clay A 2-3 2 0.197 0.084 0.0 73.6 26.4 PROJECT: Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave. and Upham St. Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165377 CLIENT: Wazee Partners, LLC EXHIBIT: B-41 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL R EPORT. GRAIN SIZE: USCS & AASHTO COMBINED 25165377.GPJ TERRACON2012.GDT 10/4/16 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth USCS No.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pa Initial Swell/Consolidation Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)(ksf) Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight 1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200 Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 1 2 SC 100 12 0.5 -0.2 1 3,4 1 4 SC 112 18 4 1 9 CL 97 26 0.5 0.0 3,4 1 14 CL 109 22 4 1 19 103 24 0.5 +3.7 3,4 1 24 96 29 4 2 2 SC 103 12 4 2 4 SC 104 19 4 2 9 CL 106 22 4 2 14 SC 102 24 4 2 19 103 23 4 2 24 105 23 0.5 +2.8 3,4 3 2 SC 108 6 4 3 4 SC 106 11 4 3 9 CL 109 20 0.5 +0.8 3,4 3 14 105 19 4 3 19 107 21 4 4 2 SC 111 9 4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks:Exhibit B-421 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth USCS NO.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200(ksf) Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 4 4 SC 108 15 4 4 14 93 23 0.5 +0.3 3,4 4 24 108 20 4 4 29 104 18 0.5 +0.5 3,4 5 2 SC 102 18 100 100 100 96 47 27 10 4 5 9 CL 112 18 4 5 14 SC 124 14 4 5 19 107 21 4 6 2 SC 107 15 4 6 9 CL 103 23 4 6 14 CL 106 25 4 6 19 104 25 4 6 29 115 16 4 7 2 SC 104 14 4 7 4 SC 104 20 4 7 9 CL 110 18 100 98 96 89 66 49 31 4 7 14 109 17 0.5 +0.8 3,4 7 19 103 23 4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks: Exhibit B-431 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only lierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth uses No.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)(ksf) Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight 1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200 Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 7 24 104 23 4 8 2 SC 101 4 4 8 4 SC 102 19 4 8 9 CL 106 21 4 8 14 97 26 4 8 24 107 19 4 9 0-5 SC-SM 100 74 72 67 32 23 5 2 9 2 SC-SM 103 9 4 9 9 CL 104 22 0.5 +0.1 3,4 9 14 105 22 4 9 19 110 18 4 9 24 103 24 0.5 +4.3 3,4 10 2 SC 104 16 100 100 100 96 39 28 12 4 10 14 CL 104 24 4 10 29 108 16 4 11 2 SC 111 6 4 11 4 SC 107 13 4 11 9 CL 109 22 4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks:Exhibit B-441 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth uses NO.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200(ksf) Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 11 19 127 12 0.5 -0.2 3,4 12 2 SC 97 5 4 12 4 SC 102 14 4 12 9 CL 104 22 4 12 14 104 23 0.5 +0.9 3,4 12 19 102 21 4 12 24 104 21 4 13 2 SC 100 5 4 13 4 SC 108 12 4 13 9 CL 103 21 4 13 14 21 4 13 19 109 19 0.5 +2.5 3,4 14 2 SM 5 4 14 4 SC 107 12 4 14 14 SC 114 19 100 97 93 70 34 33 17 4 14 24 104 23 0.5 +1.8 3,4 15 2 SC 115 16 1 4 15 4 SC 112 9 4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks: Exhibit B-451 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth USCS NO.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)(%) (kst) Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight 1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200 Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 15 9 SC 111 12 4 15 14 CL 99 25 4 15 19 CL 93 30 0.5 -0.2 3,4 15 24 94 35 4 15 29 101 23 0.5 +2.1 3,4 16 2 SC 96 7 4 16 4 SC 99 8 0.5 -1.1 3,4 16 9 CL 99 25 1 4 16 14 95 19 0.5 +0.1 3,4 16 24 105 22 4 17 2 SC 108 9 4 17 9 CL 99 26 4 17 14 102 22 0.5 +1.1 3,4 18 2 SC 109 11 4 18 9 CL 120 13 0.5 0.0 3,4 18 14 CL 110 19 4 18 24 103 24 4 19 2 SC 111 12 4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks:Exhibit B-461 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM 0698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth USCS No.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight Water Content Surcharge Swell (%) 1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200(%) (ksf) Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 19 4 SC 109 11 4 19 9 CL 107 19 0.5 0.0 3,4 19 14 104 21 4 19 24 106 20 4 20 2 SC 105 8 <1 4 20 4 SC 108 9 4 20 9 CL 102 25 4 20 14 95 24 0.5 +0.9 3,4 20 19 108 20 4 20 29 108 21 0.5 +3.8 3,4 21 2 SC 105 6 4 21 9 SC 111 18 100 99 98 90 48 26 12 4 21 14 98 23 4 21 24 112 14 4 22 2 SC 111 7 4 22 9 CL 117 16 4 22 19 CL 100 26 4 22 24 107 22 4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks: Exhibit B-471 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557UV\SHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth uses No.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)(ksf) Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight 1-1/2"#4 #10 #40 #200 Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 22 29 28 4 23 2 SC 106 12 4 23 14 104 23 0.5 +3.1 3,4 23 19 111 18 4 24 2 SC-SM 112 9 100 95 93 77 30 22 6 4 24 9 SC 114 17 4 24 14 108 19 0.5 +1.3 3,4 24 24 103 23 4 25 2 SC 101 4 4 25 9 CL 106 22 4 25 14 96 21 4 25 19 103 23 4 25 29 103 20 0.5 +2.2 3,4 26 2 SC 4 4 26 9 CL 109 20 4 26 14 100 25 4 26 19 102 24 0.5 +5.3 3,4 27 2 SC 102 4 0.5 -1.7 3,4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks:Exhibit B-481 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth USCS NO.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200(ksf) Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 27 4 SC 113 5 4 27 9 CL 110 20 4 27 14 104 21 4 27 24 110 19 0.5 +3.3 3,4 28 2 SC 101 8 4 28 4 SC 100 5 4 28 9 CL 110 18 0.5 -0.1 3,4 28 14 96 24 4 28 19 99 22 0.5 +2.0 3,4 28 29 101 20 4 29 2 SC 99 6 4 29 4 SC 8 4 29 9 CL 103 22 4 29 14 104 22 0.5 +0.6 3,4 29 19 105 22 4 29 24 104 22 4 30 2 SC 103 9 <1 4 30 4 SC 109 8 0.5 -0.8 3,4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks: Exhibit B-491 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165377 Boring Depth uses No.(ft.)Class. Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Swell/Consolidation Water Content Surcharge Swell (%)(ksf) Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight 1-1/2" #4 #10 #40 #200 Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks 30 9 CL 104 22 4 30 14 106 22 4 30 24 101 23 0.5 +3.1 3,4 30 29 112 21 4 31 2 SC 106 5 4 31 4 SC 112 7 4 31 9 CL 107 21 4 31 19 105 24 0.5 +0.5 3,4 31 24 99 25 4 32 2 SC-SM 100 97 97 71 22 20 4 32 4 SC-SM 106 8 4 32 9 CL 109 19 4 32 14 CL 106 24 0.5 -0.2 3,4 32 19 103 23 4 32 29 104 23 0.5 +4.6 3,4 Pl 2 SC-SM 110 9 100 100 100 88 26 22 6 4 4 Pl 4 SC-SM 104 14 4 Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic Remarks: Exhibit B-501 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed 38th & Upham Mixed Use Development. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 5, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165377 1Ierracon APPENDIX C SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS GENERAL NOTES DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1 13 1 Water Initially (HP)Hand Penetrometer Encountered Auger Shelby Tube Split Spoon 0/H Rock Macro Modified 1 Core Core California : Ring Sampler Grab No Modified Sample Recovery Dames & Moore Ring Sampler T Water Level After a Specified Period of Time ¥ Water Level After LU a Specified Period of Time> 9 Water levels indicated on the soil boring c logs are the levels measured in the Ill borehole at the times indicated. Q Groundwater level variations will occur * over time. In low permeability soils,accurate determination of groundwater levels is not possible with short term water level observations. (T) Torvane (b/f)Standard Penetration Test (blows per foot) N N value (PID)Photo-Ionization Detector (OVA) Organic Vapor Analyzer DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constituents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. LOCAnON AND ELEVATION NOTES Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracy of such devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +/- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area. RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GIUINED SOILS (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve.) Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance Includes qravels, sands and silts. CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS BEDROCK (50% or more passing the No. 200 sieve.) Consistency determined by laboratory shear strength testing, field visual-manual procedures or standard penetration resistance Descriptive Term (Density) Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Ring Descriptive Unconfined Sampler Term Compressive Blows/Ft. (Consistency)Strength, Qu, psf Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Ring Ring Sampler Sampler Blows/Ft.Blows/Ft. Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Descriptive Term (Consistency) Very Loose 0-3 0-6 Very Soft less than 500 0-1 <3 <30 <20 Weathered Loose 4-9 7-18 Soft 500 to 1,000 2-4 3-4 30-49 20 - 29 Firm Medium Dense 10-29 19-58 Medium-Stiff 1,000 to 2.000 5-7 5-9 50 - 89 30 - 49 Medium Hard Dense 30 50 59-98 Stiff 2,000 to 4,000 8-14 10-18 90-119 50 - 79 Hard Very Dense >50 Z 99 Very Stiff 4,000 to 8,000 15-30 19-42 >119 >79 Very Hard Hard >8.000 >30 >42 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Descriptive Term(s) of other constituents Percent of Drv Weight Maior Component of Sample Particle Size Trace <15 Boulders Over 12 in. (300 mm) With 15-29 Cobbles 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm) Modifier >30 Gravel 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) Sand #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm Silt or Clay Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm) RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Descriptive Term(s)Percent of of other constituents Drv Weight Trace <5 With 5-12 Modifier >12 Term Plasticitv Index Non-plastic 0 Low 1-10 Medium 11 - 30 High >30 lierracon Exhibit C-1 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Soil Classification Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Group Symbol Group Namea Coarse Grained Soils: More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Fine-Grained Soils: 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve Highly organic soils: Gravels:Clean Gravels: More than 50% of Less than 5% fines c coarse fraction retained Gravels with Fines: on No. 4 sieve More than 12% finesc Sands:Clean Sands: 50% or more of coarse Less than 5% fines 0 fraction passes No. 4 Sands with Fines: sieve More than 12% fineso Inorganic: Silts and Clays: Liquid limit less than 50 Organic: Inorganic: Silts and Clays: Liquid limit 50 or more Organic: Cu 2 4 and 1 £ Cc c 3E Cu <4 and/or 1 >Cc>3E Fines classify as ML or MH Fines classify as CL or CH Cu 2 6 and 1 5 Ccg 3E Cu <6 and/or 1 >Cc>36 Fines classify as ML or MH Fines classify as CL or CH PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" line J PI < 4 or plots below "A" line J Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75Liquid limit - not dried PI plots on or above "A" line PI plots below "A" line Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75Liquid limit - not dried , and organic odorPrimarily organic matter, dark in color GW Well-graded gravel F GP Poorly graded gravel F GM Silty gravel FG,H GC Clayey gravel F,GH SW Well-graded sand SP Poorly graded sand SM Silty sand G,H,[ SC Clayey sand GH.1 CL Lean clay KLM ML Sjlt K,L,M Organic clay K.L.M,N 0L Organic silt 1<,L,MO CH Fat clay KL,M MH Elastic Silt KI,M Organic clay KLMP 0H Organic silt K,L,MQ PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve 6 If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add "with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. ' Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded grave[ with clay, GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. 0 Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay (D)2E Cu = D6O/[ho CC= D x D 10 60 F If soil contains 2 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. H If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. If soil contains 2 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. < If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel," whichever is predominant. L If soil contains 2 30% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name. M If soil contains 230% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name. N Pl 2 4 and plots on or above "A" line. 0 PI < 4 or plots below "A" line. Pl plots on or above "A" line. ¤ Pl plots below "A" line. 60 1 1 For classification of fine-grained soils and fine-grained fraction 50 -of coarse-grained soils _ Equation of "A" - lineHorizontal at PI=4 to LL=25.5. 40 - then Pl=0.73 (LL-20)Equation of "U" - line Vertical at LL=16 to PI=7, / / 30 - then PI-0.9 (LL-8) >/0 . <f60 /f// / '' P / 20 ' 1 6 6, / / MH or OH / I /10 4f /CL - ML /MI- or OL 0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 LIQUID LIMIT (LL) 1Ierracon Exhibit C-2 DESCRIPTION OF ROCK PROPERTIES WEATHERING Fresh Rock fresh, crystals bright, few joints may show slight staining. Rock rings under hammer if crystalline. Very slight Rock generally fresh, joints stained, some joints may show thin clay coatings, crystals in broken face show bright. Rock rings under hammer if crystalline. Slight Rock generally fresh, joints stained, and discoloration extends into rock up to 1 in. Joints may contain clay. In granitoid rocks some occasional feldspar crystals are dull and discolored. Crystalline rocks ring under hammer. Moderate Significant portions of rock show discoloration and weathering effects. In granitoid rocks, most feldspars are dull and discolored; some show clayey. Rock has dull sound under hammer and shows significant loss of strength as compared with fresh rock. Moderately severe All rock except quartz discolored or stained. In granitoid rocks, all feldspars dull and discolored and majority show kaolinization. Rock shows severe loss of strength and can be excavated with geologist's pick. Severe All rock except quartz discolored or stained. Rock "fabric" clear and evident, but reduced in strength to strong soil. In granitoid rocks, all feldspars kaolinized to some extent. Some fragments of strong rock usually left. Very severe All rock except quartz discolored or stained. Rock "fabric" discernible, but mass effectively reduced to "soil" with only fragments of strong rock remaining. Complete Rock reduced to "soil". Rock "fabric" not discernible or discernible only in small, scattered locations. Quartz may be present as dikes or stringers. HARDNESS (for engineering description of rock - not to be confused with Moh's scale for minerals) Very hard Cannot be scratched with knife or sharp pick. Breaking of hand specimens requires several hard blows of geologist's pick. Hard Can be scratched with knife or pick only with difficulty. Hard blow of hammer required to detach hand specimen. Moderately hard Can be scratched with knife or pick. Gouges or grooves to M in. deep can be excavated by hard blow of point of a geologist's pick. Hand specimens can be detached by moderate blow. Medium Can be grooved or gouged 1 /16 in. deep by firm pressure on knife or pick point. Can be excavated in small chips to pieces about 1 -in. maximum size by hard blows of the point of a geologist's pick. Soft Can be gouged or grooved readily with knife or pick point. Can be excavated in chips to pieces several inches in size by moderate blows of a pick point. Small thin pieces can be broken by finger pressure. Very soft Can be carved with knife. Can be excavated readily with point of pick. Pieces 1 -in. or more in thickness can be broken with finger pressure. Can be scratched readily by fingernail. Joint, Bedding, and Foliation Spacing in Rock a Spacing Joints Bedding/Foliation Less than 2 in.Very close Very thin 2 in. - 1 ft.Close Thin 1 ft. - 3 ft.Moderately close Medium 3 ft.-10 ft.Wide Thick More than 10 ft.Very wide Very thick a. Spacing refers to the distance normal to the planes, of the described feature, which are parallel to each other or nearly so. Rock Quality Designator (RQD) a RQD, as a percentage Diagnostic description Exceeding 90 Excellent 90 - 75 Good 75 - 50 Fair 50 - 25 Poor Less than 25 Very poor a. RQD (given as a percentage) = length of core in pieces 4 in. and longer/length of run. Joint Openness Descriptors Openness Descriptor No Visible Separation Tight Less than 1/32 in.Slightly Open 1/32 to 1 /8 in.Moderately Open 1/8 to 3/8 in.Open 3/8 in. to 0.1 ft.Moderately Wide Greater than 0.1 ft.Wide References: American Society of Civil Engineers. Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice - No. 56. Subsurface Investigation for Desian and Construction of Foundations of Buildinas. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1976. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Enaineerina Geoloav Field Manual. 1Ierracon Exhibit C-3 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank Northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 Terracon Project No. 25165385 Prepared for: Vectra Bank of Colorado Denver, Colorado Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Wheat Ridge, Colorado tyl- 8©19,55© terracon.com illierracon Environmental I Facilities I Geotechnical I Materials 1 October 25, 2016 1Ierracon Vectra Bank of Colorado 2000 South Colorado Boulevard, Ste 2-1200 Denver, Colorado 80222 Attn: Mr. James Yankovich E: James.Yankovich@vectrabank.com P: (720) 947-7576 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank Northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165385 Mr. Yankovich: Terracon Consultants, Inc. (Terracon) has completed the geotechnical engineering exploration for the above referenced project. This study was performed in general accordance with our proposal number P25165385 dated August 19, 2016. This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical recommendations concerning earthwork and the design and construction of foundations, floorslabs and pavementthickness recommendations for the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. Ed> .: " 33822 U) : 13 -0 t :Ck: H0 : 10/25/16 7 44U» Scott B. Myers, P,E. Geotechnical Department Manager SWA ((31 - -- jiru' · p lt:;7 {1 B C 7-' (ri1 John N. Haas, P.E. Senior Staff Engineer Enclosures CC:Addressee (PDF) 1 - File Terracon Consultants, Inc. 10625 W. 1-70 Frontage Rd N, Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033 P [303]423-3300 F [303]423-3353 www.temacon.corn Environmental I Facilities I Geotechnical •Materials Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY i 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 1 2.1 Project Description 1 2.2 Site Location and Description 9 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 7 3.1 Geology ..39 3.2 Typical Profile 3.3 Groundwater 4 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 9 4.1 Geotechnical Considerations 5 4.1.1 Existing Fill Materialq 5 4.1.2 Low Strength Soils 6 4.1.3 Shallow Groundwater 6 4.1.4 Expansive Soils and Bedrock Materiak 6 4.2 Earthwork ..J 4.2.1 Site Preparation 7 4.2.2 Material Typeq ...8 4.2.3 Compaction Requirements 9 4.2.4 Excavation and Trench Construction 9 4.2.5 Grading and Drainage .10 4.2.6 Earthwork Construction Considerations 11 4.2.7 Soluble Sulfate Test Resultg 11 4.3 Foundation Recommendations 12 4.3.1 Spread Footing Design Recommendations 12 4.3.2 Spread Footing Construction Considerations 13 4.3.3 Drilled Pier Design Recommendations .15 4.3.4 Drilled Pier Construction Considerations ,16 4.4 Seismic Considerations .17 4.5 Interior Floor 18 4.5.1 Interior Floor Design Recommendations .18 4.5.2 Interior Floor Construction Considerations .19 4.6 Exterior Flatwork 19 4.6.1 Exterior Flatwork Design Recommendations 19 4.6.2 Exterior Flatwork Construction Considerations 20 43 Lateral Earth Pressures 20 4.8 Pavement Design and Construction .22 4.8.1 Design Traffic 99 4.8.2 Subgrade Snilq 4.8.3 Recommended Minimum Pavement Sections and Materials...................23 4.8.4 Construction Considerations .23 4.8.5 Pavement Performance 94 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS 95 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) APPENDIX A - FIELD EXPLORATION Exhibit A-1 Field Exploration Description Exhibit A-2 Site Location Exhibit A-3 Aerial Image Exploration Plan Exhibit A-4 Boring Location Plan Exhibits A-5 to A-11 Boring Logs APPENDIX B - LABORATORY TESTING Exhibit B-1 Laboratory Testing Description Exhibits B-2 to B-5 Swell-Consolidation Test Results Exhibit B-6 Grain Size Distribution Exhibits B-7 to B-8 Summary of Laboratory Test Results APPENDIX C - SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS Exhibit C-1 General Notes Exhibit C-2 Unified Soil Classification Exhibit C-3 Description of Rock Properties Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A geotechnical engineering exploration has been prepared for the proposed Vectra Bank to be located northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Based on the information obtained from our subsurface exploration and the laboratory testing completed, the site appears suitable for the proposed construction; however, the following geotechnical conditions will need to be considered: • Up to about 3 feet of fill was encountered on the subject site. We do not possess any information regarding whether the fill was placed under the observation of a geotechnical engineer. In our opinion, the existing fill should not be used to support foundations or slab-on-grade construction without complete removal and modification and within pavement areas without partial removal and modification. We anticipate that the existing fill can be reused for support of shallow foundations, slabs-on-grade and pavements, provided any deleterious fill materials are removed and some movement can be tolerated. • Based on the geotechnical engineering analyses, subsurface exploration and laboratory test results, the proposed building may be constructed on a spread footing foundation bottomed on native soils or new engineered fill, provided the owner is willing to risk some potential movement. Alternatively, if the owner is not willing to accept the risk of movement associated with a spread footing foundation system, the proposed building may be constructed on drilled pier foundation system. • Slabs-on-grade may be utilized for the interior floor system when constructed on native soils or new engineered fill, provided the owner is willing to accept the risk of movement. If very little movement can be tolerated, a structural floor, supported independent of the subgrade materials, is recommended. • Based on the 2015 International Building Code (IBC), the IBC seismic site classification for this site is D. • Low strength soils are locally present on the site. Consequently, low strength soils will be encountered below slabs-on-grade and/or at foundation bearing depth and these conditions will likely require some corrective work. Corrective work could involve removal and re-compaction/replacement, in-place soil densification or deepening footing excavations to suitable bearing materials. . The amount of movement associated with foundations, floor slabs, slabs-on-grade, etc. will be related to the wetting of the underlying soils and bedrock. Therefore, it is imperative the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed to reduce potential movement. Moisture conditioning and/or replacement of the on-site fill materials and/or native soils and bedrock should follow the recommendations outlined in the "Earthwork" section of this report. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable i Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon This summary should be used in conjunction with the entire report for design purposes. It should be recognized that details were not included or fully developed in this section, and the report must be read in its entirety for a comprehensive understanding of the items contained herein. The section titled GENERAL COMMENTS should be read for an understanding of the report limitations. Responsive. Resourceful . Reliable ii GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT PROPOSED VECTRA BANK NORTHWEST OF WEST 38TH AVENUE AND UPHAM STREET WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Terracon Project No. 25165385 October 25, 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION A geotechnical engineering report has been prepared for the proposed Vectra Bank to be located northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. As part of our subsurface exploration, seven (7) borings (designated as Boring Nos. VB-1 to VB- 3 and VP-1 to VP-4) were drilled at the site to varying depths of about 5 to 35 feet below existing site grades. Boring Logs along with a Boring Location Plan are included in Appendix A of this report. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: • Subsurface soil and bedrock conditions • Groundwater levels • Earthwork • Grading and drainage • Lateral earth pressures 2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION 2.1 Project Description • Foundation design and construction • Seismic site classification • Floor slab design and construction • Pavement design and construction Item Description Site layout See Appendix A, Boring Location Plan We understand the proposed construction will consist of the construction of a single-story Veda Bank. A drive-thru will beProposed construction constructed on the west side of the proposed bank. We do not anticipate the proposed bank will include basement construction. We assume the proposed building will consist of structural steelBuilding construction and cast-in-place concrete construction. Anticipated foundation systems Spread footings Below grade areas None anticipated Maximum loads Columns: 75 to 150 kips (assumed) Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 1 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Item Description Grading Excavation depth Free-standing retaining walls Walls: 2 to 4 kIf (assumed) Slabs: 150 to 250 psf (assumed) Cut and fill, 3 feet (+A) max About 3 feet (assumed) None indicated Infrastructure Asphalt or portland cement concrete paved parking areas and drives, along with the installation of utilities within about 5 to 8 feet of finished site grades will also be constructed as part of the development of the subject site. 2.2 Site Location and Description Item Location Description The proposed Vectra Bank will be located northwest of West 38th Avenue and Upham Street in Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The general location of the proposed project is 39.7696° N 105.0789° W. Existing improvements Current ground cover Existing topography The subject site consists of a parking area, access drive and landscaped area. Ground cover in the area of the proposed project consists of existing asphalt pavements, barren ground and landscaping. The site is generally flat with an elevation difference of about 3 feet or less. 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 Geology Surficial geologic conditions at the site, as mapped by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) (1Trimble and Machette, 1979), consist of windblown sand and silts of Holocene and Pleistocene Ages. These materials, as mapped in this area, are generally on the order of 15 to 25 feet in thickness. Bedrock underlying the surface units consists of the Denver and Arapahoe Formations of Paleocene and Upper Cretaceous Age. These formations within this area have been reported to include claystone, sandstone, and siltstone. The thickness of these units has been reported to be on the order of 900 feet. Trimble, Don E. and Machette, Michael N., 1979, Geo/ogic Map of the Greater DenverArea, Front Range, Urban Corridor, Colorado,United States Geological Survey, Map 1-856-H. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 2 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon Mapping completed by the Colorado Geological Survey (2Hart, 1972) indicates the site is located in an area of"Windblown Sand and SIR". These materials are identified as being predominantly lowswelling, but may be moderate swelling. Some deposits have the potential to settle or collapse after wetting under applied loads. The geologic conditions presented in this section were obtained by locating the subject site on available large-scale geologic maps. Due to the scales involved, precise location of the site can be difficult to determine. In addition, the large-scale geologic maps describe only general trends. Local variations are possible and site specific geology may differ from those described above. A site-specific detailed geologic description is beyond the scope of this project. Due to the relatively flat nature of the site, geologic hazards at the site are anticipated to be low. Seismic activity in the area is anticipated to be low, and the property should be relatively stable from a structural standpoint. With proper site grading around proposed structure, erosional problems at the site should be reduced. 3.2 Typical Profile Based on the results of the borings for this exploration, subsurface conditions on the site can be generalized as follows: Material Description Asphalt Approximate Depth to Bottom of Stratum below Existing Site Grade About 4 to 5 inches, Encountered in Boring Nos. VB-2, VB-3, VP-3 and VP-4. Consistency/ Relative Density/ Hardness N/A Fill materials consisting of sand with varying amounts of silt, clay and gravel Native soils consisting of sand with varying amounts of silt, day and gravel, and lean clay with varying amounts of sand About 1 to 3 feet About 5 to 34 feet, Maximum depth explored in Boring Nos. VP-1 to VP-4 Variable Sand: loose to dense Clay: medium stiff to very stiff About 35 feet, Bedrock consisting of claystone Maximum depth explored in remaining borings * - A petroleum type odor was noted in some of the exploratory borings Firm to medium hard 2Hart, Stephen S., 1972,Potentially Swelling Soil and Rock in the Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado, Colorado Geological Survey, Sheet 2 of 4. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 3 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Stratification boundaries on the boring logs represent the approximate location of changes in soil and material types; in-situ, the transition between materials may be gradual. Further details of the borings can be found on the Boring Logs in Appendix A. Laboratory testing indicates the sand fill materials and native sand and clay soils have nil to low swell potential. It has been our experience that the claystone bedrock in the area has low to high swell potential. Results of water soluble sulfate testing performed on samples obtained during our field exploration indicated a "not applicable" severity with an exposure class of SO based on the American Concrete Institute (ACI) guidelines. A summary of laboratory test results is included in Appendix B. 3.3 Groundwater The borings were observed for groundwater while drilling. The groundwater levels are noted on the Boring Logs, and are summarized below. Boring No.Depth to groundwater while drilling Depth to groundwater at least one day after drilling and date measured VB-1 Aboutl Ofeet - VB-2 About 11 feet - VB-3 About 12 feet - VP-1 None encountered -* VP-2 None encountered - VP-3 None encountered - VP-4 None encountered - * Boring was backfilled after obtaining initial groundwater measurement. These observations represent groundwater conditions at the time of the preliminary field exploration, and may not be indicative of other times or at other locations. Groundwater levels can be expected to fluctuate with varying seasonal and weather conditions. Based upon review of USGS maps (3Hillier, et al, 1983), regional groundwater beneath the project area is located in unconsolidated alluvial deposits, generally between 10 to 20 feet from the present ground surface. 3Hillier, Donald E.; Schneider, Paul A., Jr.; and Hutchinson, E. Carter, 1983,Depth to Water Table (1976-1977) in the Greater Denver Area, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado,United States Geological Survey, Map 1-856-K. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 4 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 • Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Zones of perched and/or trapped groundwater may also occur at times in the subsurface soils overlying bedrock, on top of the bedrock surface or within permeable fractures in the bedrock materials. The location and amount of perched water is dependent upon several factors, including hydrologic conditions, type of site development, irrigation demands on or adjacent to the site, fluctuations in water features, seasonal and weather conditions. Groundwater level fluctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff, and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater levels during con,struction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. 4.0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION 4.1 Geotechnical Considerations Based on subsurface conditions encountered in the borings, the site appears suitable for the proposed construction from a geotechnical point of view provided certain precautions and design and construction recommendations outlined in this report are followed. We have identified geotechnical conditions that could impact design and construction of the proposed building and other site improvements. 4.1.1 Existing Fill Materials Up to about 3 feet of fill materials was encountered in portions of the site. It should be noted that fill depths presented in the boring logs are approximate and the depth and composition of fill should be expected to vary. We do not possess any information regarding whether the fill was placed under the observation of a geotechnical engineer. Based upon the results of our field exploration and laboratory testing, it is our opinion the existing fill should not be used to support foundations, interior slabs, exterior slabs-on-grade or pavement construction without complete removal and modification. If the owner is willing to accept a higher risk of movement for pavements and exterior slabs, consideration could be given to overexcavating a portion of the existing fill materials below these elements, then processing, moisture conditioning and compacting the materials back to subgrade elevation. It should be noted that there exists the potential for construction debris and/or domestic trash to be encountered within the fill on some portions of the site. Since construction debris was not encountered within the borings, the potential for encountering construction debris and/ordomestic trash is considered to be low. This should be verified by additional geotechnical exploration or evaluation at the site. If additional exploration is not performed, the owner should make Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 5 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lirracon allowances for such conditions to exist in the preparation of the projed budget and/or construction plans. The existing fill can be reused as engineered fill below foundations, slabs-on-grade and pavements, provided any deleterious materials are removed and some movement can be tolerated. Some removal and replacement may be required if unsuitable or soft materials are exposed. 4.1.2 Low Strength Soils Test boring data indicate that low strength soils will be locally present. Conseqdently, low strength soils will most likely be encountered below on grade slabs and/or at foundation bearing depth and these conditions will likely require some corrective work. Corrective work could involve removal and re-compaction/replacement, in-place soil densification or deepening footing excavations to suitable bearing materials. In any event, Terracon should be contacted to observe foundation excavations to evaluate bearing conditions and to provide guidance concerning corrective work (if needed). 4.1.3 Shallow Groundwater Groundwater was encountered during drilling of this exploration at depths ranging from 10 to 12 feet below existing ground surface. Because below grade levels are not planned for the structure, we do not anticipate groundwater will adversely impact the proposed construction of the building; however, installation of deep utilities or an underground detention vault may be influenced by the presence of the shallow groundwater. In addition, although not likely, it is possible excavation of the existing fill materials may encounter perched groundwater conditions. We anticipate isolated pockets of perched groundwater could be controlled by shallow trenches drained to sump pits where the water can be removed by pumping. Excavations below the encountered groundwater levels will likely require more aggressive dewatering measures. 4.1.4 Expansive Soils and Bedrock Materials Laboratory testing indicates the sand fill materials and native sand and clay soils have nil to low swell potential. It has been our experience that the claystone bedrock in the area has low to high swell potential. This report provides recommendations to help mitigate the effects of soil shrinkage and expansion. However, even if these procedures are followed, some movement and cracking in the building, pavements, and flatwork should be anticipated. The severity of cracking and other damage such as uneven floor slabs will probably increase if any modification of the site results in excessive wetting or drying of the expansive clays and bedrock. Eliminating the risk of movement and distress is generally not be feasible, but it may be possible to further reduce the risk of movement if significantly more expensive measures are used during construction. It is imperative Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 6 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 i Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed to reduce movement. 4.2 Earthwork The following presents recommendations for site preparation, excavation, subgrade preparation and placement of engineered fills on the project. All earthwork on the project should be observed and evaluated by Terracon. 4.2.1 Site Preparation Stripped materials consisting of asphalt, demolition debris, vegetation, unsuitable fills and organic materials should be wasted from the site or used to revegetate landscaped areas or exposed slopes after completion of grading operations. Where possible, the site should be initially graded to create a relatively level surface to receive fill and to provide for a relatively uniform thickness of fill beneath the proposed structure. All exposed areas that will receive fill, once properly cleared, should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, properly moisture conditioned and compacted. It is imperative the moisture content of prepared materials be protected from moisture loss. Although evidence of underground facilities such as grease pits, septic tanks, cesspools, existing foundations and basements was not observed during the site reconnaissance, such features could be encountered during construction. If unexpected fills or underground facilities are encountered, such features should be removed and the excavation thoroughly cleaned prior to backfill placement and/or construction. It is anticipated that excavations for the proposed construction can be accomplished with conventional earthmoving equipment. Depending upon depth of excavation and seasonal conditions, groundwater may be encountered in excavations on the site. Perched groundwater seeping into excavations at this site could most likely be controlled by shallow trenches leading to a sump pit where the water could be removed by pumping. Excavations below the encountered groundwater levels will likely require more aggressive dewatering measures. Soft unstable subgrade soils will most likely be encountered as excavation bottoms approach the groundwaterelevation. Where unstable conditions are encountered ordevelop during construction, workability may be improved by overexcavation of wet zones and mixing these soils with crushed gravel or recycled concrete and recompaction. The stability of subgrade soils may be affected by precipitation, repetitive construction traffic or other factors. If unstable conditions are encountered or develop during construction, workability may be improved by overexcavation of wet zones and mixing these soils with crushed gravel. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 7 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Use of geotextiles could also be considered as a stabilization technique. Lightweight excavation equipment may be required to reduce subgrade pumping. 4.2.2 Material Types Engineered fill should meet the following material property requirements: Fill Type 1 USCS Classification Acceptable location for placement On-site clay soils are considered suitable for reuse asOn-site clay soils CL compacted fill below foundations, slab and pavement areas. SC, SM, SC-SM, SP-On-site sand soils are considered suitable for reuse asOn-site sand soils SM compacted fill below foundations, slab and pavement areas. Processed demolition debris (asphalt and concrete) Properly processed asphalt is considered suitable for reuse as compacted fill below foundation, slab and pavement areas, provided the materials are processed and blended with on-site soils. Imported soils Varies Imported soils meeting the gradation outlined herein can be considered acceptable for use as engineered fill beneath foundations, slabs and pavements. 1. Controlled, compacted fill should consist of approved materials that are free of organic matter and debris. Frozen material should not be used, and fill should not be placed on a frozen subgrade. A sample of each material type should be submitted to the geotechnical engineer for evaluation. 2. Care should be taken during the fill placement process to avoid zones of dis-similar fill. Improvements constructed over varying fill types are at a higher risk of differential movement compared to improvements over a uniform fill zone. 3. Demolition debris (asphalt and concrete) should be processed to maximum individual particle size of 3 inches and blended with on-site soils prior to reuse at a ratio of 50 percent asphalt or concrete debris to 50 percent soil. Imported soils should meet the following material property requirements: Gradation Percent finer by weight (ASTM C136) 3" 100 1" 90-100 %" 50-100 No. 4 Sieve 50-100 No. 200 Sieve 10-35 • Liquid Limit 30 (max) • Plasticity Indew 10 (max) • Maximum Expansive Potential (%).............................0.5* *Measured on a sample compacted to approximately 95 percent of the ASTM D698 maximum dry density at optimum water content. The sample is confined under a 200 psf surcharge and submerged. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 8 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon 4.2.3 Compaction Requirements Engineered fill should be placed and compacted in horizontal lifts, using equipment and procedures that will produce recommended moisture contents and densities throughout the lift. Item Fill lift thickness Description 8-inches or less in loose thickness when heavy, self-propelled compaction equipment is used 4 to 6-inches in loose thickness when hand-guided equipment (i.e. jumping jack, plate compactor) is used Compaction requirements 1,4 98% (below foundations) and 95% of the materials standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D698) Moisture content cohesive soils (clay) Moisture content cohesionless soils (sand) 0 to +3% of the optimum moisture content -3 to +3% of the optimum moisture content 1. We recommend that engineered fill be tested for water content and compaction during placement. Should the results of the in-place density tests indicate the specified water or compaction limits have not been met, the area represented by the test should be reworked and retested as required until the specified water and compaction requirements are achieved. 2. Water levels should be maintained low enough to allow for satisfactory compaction to be achieved without the compacted fill material pumping when proofrolled. 3. Moisture conditioned clay soils should not be allowed to dry out. A loss of moisture within these materials could result in an increase in the materials' expansive potential. Subsequent wetting of these materials could result in undesirable movement. 4. Due to the potential varied nature of soils blended with properly processed demolition debris, additional testing methods may be required at the time of placement in order to determine acceptable compaction effort. 4.2.4 Excavation and Trench Construction Excavations into the subsurface soils will encounter a variety of conditions. Excavations into the sand fill materials and native sand soils will be subject to sloughing and caving, while excavations into the native clay soils can be expected to stand on relatively steep temporary slopes during construction. The individual contractor(s) is responsible for designing and constructing stable, temporary excavations as required to maintain stability of both the excavation sides and bottom. All excavations should be sloped or shored in the interest of safety following local and federal regulations, including current Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) excavation and trench safety standards. Soils penetrated by the proposed excavations may vary significantly across the site. The soil classifications are based solely on the materials encountered in the exploratory borings. The contractor should verify that similar conditions exist throughout the proposed area of excavation. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 9 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon If different subsurface conditions are encountered atthe time of construction, the actual conditions should be evaluated to determine any excavation modifications necessary to maintain safe conditions. As a safety measure, it is recommended that all vehicles and soil piles be kept to a minimum lateral distance from the crest of the slope equal to no less than the slope height. The exposed slope face should be protected against the elements. 4.2.5 Grading and Drainage All grades must be adjusted to provide positive drainage away from the building during construction and maintained throughout the life of the proposed project. Infiltration of water into utility or foundation excavations must be prevented during construction. Landscaped irrigation adjacent to the foundation system should be minimized or eliminated. Water permitted to pond near or adjacent to the perimeter of the structure (either during or post-construction) can result in significantly higher soil movements than those discussed in this report. As a result, any estimations of potential movement described in this report cannot be relied upon if positive drainage is not obtained and maintained, and water is allowed to infiltrate the fill and/or subgrade. Exposed ground should be sloped at a minimum of 5 percent grade for at least 10 feet beyond the perimeter of the building. Where possible, asphalt pavement or concrete flatwork should be sloped at a minimum of 2 percent beyond the building perimeter. Where Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or other requirements or existing site features limit the gradient, slopes on the order of M to 1 percent minimum are considered acceptable. Backfill against footings, exterior walls and in utility and sprinkler line trenches should be well compacted and free of all construction debris to reduce the possibility of water infiltration. After building construction and prior to projed completion, we recommend that verification of final grading be performed to document that positive drainage, as described above, has been achieved. Flatwork will be subject to post construction movement. Maximum grades practical should be used for paving and flatwork to prevent areas where water can pond. In addition, allowances in final grades should take into consideration post-construction movement of flatwork, particularly if such movement would be critical. Where paving or flatwork abuts the structure, care should be taken that joints are properly sealed and maintained to prevent the infiltration of surface water. Where landscape or xeriscape areas are within 10 feet of the foundation system, the areas shall have positive drainage away from the foundation that is not hindered by landscape edging, grade variations or vegetation. In addition, consideration should be given to snow removal practices that will minimize the stockpiling of snow in planter and landscaped areas adjacent to structural improvements. Planters located adjacent to the structure should preferably be self-contained. Sprinkler mains and spray heads should be located a minimum of 10 feet away from the building line. Where drip irrigation is located near the existing building, we recommend that drip irrigation systems be Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 10 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vedra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon located at least 5 feet from the outside edge of the foundations. Roof drains should discharge on pavements or be extended away from the structure a minimum of 10 feet through the use of splash blocks or downspout extensions. 4.2.6 Earthwork Construction Considerations Upon completion of grading operations, care should be taken to maintain the moisture content of the subgrade priorto construction of foundations, floor slabs, pavements, etc. Construction traffic over prepared subgrade should be minimized and avoided to the extent practical. Construction traffic over processed clay subgrade will eventually reduce the moisture content and increase the density of the subgrade. Subsequent wetting of these materials will result in undesirable movement. The site should also be graded to prevent ponding of surface water on the prepared subgrades or in excavations. If the subgrade should become frozen, desiccated, saturated, or disturbed, the affected material should be removed or these materials should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted prior to foundation or floor slab construction. Unstable subgrade conditions could be present below existing pavements/hardscape or develop during general construction operations, particularly if the soils are wetted and/or subjected to repetitive construction traffic. Should unstable subgrade conditions develop, stabilization measures will need to be employed. Options for subgrade stabilization can include removal of unsuitable material and replacement with approved fill material. An alternative can include the use of Mirafi HP370 geotextile (or approved equivalent) overlain by Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Class 5 or 6 aggregate base course. The depth of aggregate base course will depend on the severity of unstable soils. Trees or other vegetation whose root systems have the ability to remove excessive moisture from the subgrade and foundation soils should not be planted next to the structure. Trees and shrubbery should be kept away from the exterior edges of foundations, a distance at least equal to their expected mature height. The geotechnical engineer should be retained during the construction phase of the project to observe earthwork and to perform necessary tests and observations during overexcavation operations, excavations, subgrade preparation; proof-rolling; placement and compaction of controlled compacted fills; backfilling of excavations into the completed subgrade, and just prior to construction of building floor slabs. 4.2.7 Soluble Sulfate Test Results The following table lists the results of laboratory soluble sulfate testing performed on samples obtained during our field exploration. These values may be used to estimate potential corrosive characteristics of the on-site soils with respect to contact with the various underground materials that will be used for project construction. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 11 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Boring No.Sample Depth (feet)Soluble Sulfatel (mg/l) VP-1 0-5 1 VP-4 0-5 1 1. Results of soluble sulfate testing indicate that samples of the on-site soils have an exposure class of SO when classified in accordance with Table 4.2.1 of the ACI Design Manual. The results of the testing indicate ASTM Type I Portland Cement is suitable for project concrete in contact with on-site soils. However, if there is no (or minimal) cost differential, use of ASTM Type 11 Portland Cement is recommended for additional sulfate resistance of construction concrete. Concrete should be designed in accordance with the provisions of the ACI Design Manual, Section 318, Chapter 4. 4.3 Foundation Recommendations Based upon the results of the field exploration and laboratory testing program, the following foundation systems were evaluated for use in supporting the proposed building: • Spread footings on native soils or a zone of engineered fill. • Straight-shaft, cast-in-place piers/shafts constructed in bedrock. In our opinion, spread footings may be constructed on native soils or a zone of new engineered fill materials provided the owner is willing to accept the risk of movement. If the owner is not willing to accept the risk of movement associated with a spread footing foundation, the proposed structure may be constructed on a drilled pier foundation system bottomed in the underlying bedrock. 4.3.1 Spread Footing Design Recommendations The proposed building may be constructed on spread footing foundations bottomed on native soils, provided the owner is willing to accept the associated risk of movement and all existing fill materials (if encountered) below the building footprint are removed and modified or replaced with imported fill materials. Native soils at the base of all excavations should be surface compacted with heavy, vibratory compaction equipment prior to footing construction. Fill materials beneath foundations should be placed and compacted as outlined in the "Earthwork" section of this report; Terracon should be contaded to observe on a full-time basis. Design recommendations for a spread footing foundation system are presented in the following paragraphs. Description Value Overexcavation/modification depth All existing fill must be removed to native soils. Native soils at the base of all excavations must be surface compacted with heavy,vibratory compaction equipment. Responsive. Resourceful . Reliable 12 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Description Value Supporting stratum Maximum net allowable bearing pressurel Minimum dead load pressure Void Thickness, if needed Coefficient of friction (sliding) Native soils or new engineered fill 2,000 psf N/A N/A 0.35 Minimum footing dimensions Isolated footings: 24 inches Continuous footings: 16 inches Minimum embedment below finished grade for frost 3 feetprotection2 Approximate total movement from foundation loads 3 About 1 inch Estimated differential movement from foundation loads 3,4 About M to 31 inch 1. The recommended net allowable bearing pressure is the pressure in excess of the minimum surrounding overburden pressure at the footing base elevation. This pressure assumes that any existing fill or lower strength soils, if encountered, will be excavated and replaced with engineered fill. 2. For conventional perimeter footings, footings beneath unheated areas, and footings that will be exposed to freezing conditions during construction. Interior footings may bottom at a minimum depth of 12 inches below finished grade in heated areas. 3. Foundation settlement will depend upon the variations within the subsurface soil profile, the structural loading conditions, the embedment depth of the footings, the thickness of engineered fill, and the quality of the earthwork operations and footing construction. 4. Differential settlement is considered over a distance of about 40 feet. Footings should be proportioned on the basis of equal total dead load pressure to reduce differential movement between adjacent footings. Additional foundation movements than those presented in the previous table could occur if water from any source infiltrates the foundation soils; therefore, proper drainage should be provided in the final design and during construction and throughout the life of the structure. Failure to maintain the proper drainage as recommended in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report will nullify the movement estimates provided above. 4.3.2 Spread Footing Construction Considerations Spread footing construction should only be considered if some foundation movement can be tolerated. Spread footing foundations should be constructed on native soils or new engineered fill consisting of modified on-site soils or imported materials. All existing fill (if encountered) below the building footprint must be overexcavated to native soils, processed, moisture conditioned and recompacted and/or replaced with non- expansive imported fill materials. The native soils present at the base of all excavations should Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 13 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon be compacted with heavy, vibratory compaction equipment prior to placement of new engineered fill. Unstable subgrade conditions may be encountered at the base of the footing excavations. Unstable surfaces will need to be stabilized prior to backfilling excavations and/or constructing spread footings. The use of angular rock, recycled concrete and/orgravel pushed into the yielding subgrade is considered suitable means of stabilizing the subgrade. The use of bi-axial geogrid materials in conjunction with gravel could also be considered and could be more cost effective. As an alternative, consideration could also be given to chemically treating the subgrade. Unstable subgrade conditions should be observed by the geotechnical engineer to assess the subgrade and provide suitable alternatives for stabilization. Stabilized areas should be proofrolled prior to continuing construction to assess the stability of the subgrade. The zone of new engineered fill and overexcavation of existing fill below footings should extend laterally beyond all edges of the footings at least 8 inches per foot of overexcavation depth below footing base elevation. The overexcavation should then be backfilled up to the footing base elevation with approved fill placed in lifts of 8 inches or less in loose thickness (6 inches or less if using hand-guided compaction equipment) and compacted to at least 98 percent of the material's standard effort maximum dry density (ASTM D698). The overexcavation and backfill procedure is described in the following figures. 'IFtme11 -%11-11- Design / /. 'TDesign, 2/30 F------- ¥V 6--2/30 1 Footing Level J Footing Level *_ 1 - 1 4 Recommended Excavation Level LEAN CONCRETE Recommended Excavation Level -/1 11: i !- , 22 1.r COMPACTED STRUCTURAL D .1=1 FILL 1.-11L -t.[4146211 4-' '- Lean Concrete Backfill Overexcavation / Backfill NOTE: Excavations in sketches shown vertical for convenience. Excavations should be sloped as necessary for safety The base of all foundation excavations should be free of water and loose soil prior to concrete placement. Concrete should be placed soon after excavating to reduce bearing soil disturbance. Should the soils at bearing level become excessively dry, disturbed or saturated, or frozen, the affected soil should be removed prior to placing concrete. Footings, foundations and masonry walls should be detailed and reinforced as necessary to reduce the potential for distress caused by differential foundation movement. The use of joints at openings or other discontinuities in masonry walls is recommended. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 14 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon 4.3.3 Drilled Pier Design Recommendations Design recommendations for a drilled pier foundation system are presented in the following paragraphs: Description Value Minimum pier length 1 30 feet Minimum bedrock embedment 2 10 feet Maximum end-bearing pressure Skin friction 3 Uplift force (tension due to soil uplift, kips) Minimum pier diameter Void Thickness 20,000 psf 1,500 psf N/A 18 inches or Length/Diameter < 30 N/A 1. The required minimum length is from the finished floor elevation for the structure of the building. 2. Drilled shafts should be embedded into firm or harder bedrock materials. 3. Skin friction value is for firm or harder bedrock. Skin friction would not be applied to fill, overburden soils or weathered bedrock materials. 4. Movement on the order of less than M inch should be anticipated for the drilled piers, provided the piers and properly designed and constructed. Skin friction capacity provided may be used for compression and tension loading. 5. The portion of the drilled piers that can resist the uplift force shown above must be (a) embedded in firm or harder bedrock and (b) be at least 15 feet below the top of the drilled pier. 6. Provided the minimum bedrock embedment is achieved, a minimum dead load is not necessary. 7. In accordance with IBC Section 1806.1, if design of the pier foundations is completed using allowable stress design (ASD) methods, the vertical bearing resistance may be increased by 1 /3 where used with the alternative basic load combinations that include wind or seismic loads that are described in IBC Section 1605.3.2. This 1/3 increase does not apply if design is completed using load and resistance factor design (LRFD) methods. Increases also do not apply to the resistance of uplift loads, nor to the soil properties provided in this report for modeling the pier response to lateral loads, nor the resulting lateral pier deflection vs. applied load graph. 8. Shear rings at least 3 inches high by 3 inches deep should be installed at 16 inches on center within the bottom 10 feet of the shaft. Piers should be considered to work in group action if the horizontal spacing is less than three pier diameters. A minimum practical horizontal clear spacing between piers of at least three diameters should be maintained, and adjacent piers should bottom at the same elevation. The capacity of individual piers must be reduced when considering the effects of group action. Capacity reduction is a function of pier spacing and the number of piers within a group. The following table presents capacity reductions for closely spaced piers. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 15 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon Description Value 1 Drilled pier spacing >3 diameters >2 to 3 diameters 1 to 2 diameters (center to center) Pier capacity reduction None 30 percent 50 percent 1. End bearing values do not need to be reduced for closely spaced piers, if bottom of piers are at the same elevation. To satisfy forces in the horizontal direction using the computer program LPile©, piers may be designed for the following lateral load criteria: Soil Layer Undrained Angle of Coeff. of Unit Weight Shear Internal Subgrade Strain, 250 (pcf)Strength Friction,Reaction, k (%) (psf)*(degrees)(pci) Sand soil 115 N/A 30 60 N/A 500-static Clay soils 110 150 0 0.007 200-cyclic 1,500-static Claystone 120 1,000 0 0.005 600-cyclic * The claystone bedrock may be in modeled as a hard clay. Lateral analysis should account for the center to center spacing and P-Y multiplier values per the following table: Pier center to center spacing P-multiplier, PM P-multiplier, PM P-multiplier, Pn. (in direction of loading)Row 1 Row 2 Row 3 and higher 3 x diameter 0.8 0.4 0.3 5 x diameter 1.0 0.85 0.7 The structural engineer should determine the reinforcement necessary for the piers. At a minimum, all piers should be reinforced full depth for the applied axial, lateral and uplift stresses imposed. We recommend a minimum reinforcement of at least 1 percent of the cross-sectional area of the pier. 4.3.4 Drilled Pier Construction Considerations Drilling to design depth should be possible with conventional single-flight power augers; however, very hard and potentially cemented bedrock layers could require the use of heavy-duty equipment. Due to the presence of groundwater, and potentially caving soils, temporary steel easing of the pier shafts and/or drilling slurry will likely be needed during pier installation and construction to reduce groundwater inflow and borehole collapse, and to properly drill and clean the piers prior to concrete placement. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 16 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Groundwater should be removed from each pier hole prior to concrete placement. Pier concrete should be placed immediately after completion of drilling and cleaning. If pier concrete cannot be placed in dry conditions, a tremie should be used for concrete placement. Due to potential sloughing and raveling, foundation concrete quantities may exceed calculated geometric volumes. Pier-bearing surfaces must be cleaned prior to concrete placement. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe the bearing surface and shaft configuration. Pier easing should be anticipated due to the presence of groundwater. Casing should be withdrawn in a slow continuous manner maintaining a-sufficient head of concrete to prevent infiltration of water or caving soils or the creation of voids in pier concrete. Pier concrete should have a relatively high fluidity when placed in cased pier holes or through a tremie. Pier concrete with slump in the range of 5 to 7 inches is recommended for non-eased piers and a slump of 7 to 9 inches is recommended for cased piers. We recommend shear rings be installed at 16 inches on-center within the bottom 10 feet of the shaft. Shaft bearing surfaces must be cleaned prior to concrete placement. A representative of the geotechnical engineer should observe the bearing surface, shaft configuration and shear ring installation. Free-fall concrete placement in piers will only be acceptable if provisions are taken to avoid striking the concrete on the sides of the hole or reinforcing steel. The use of a bottom-dump hopper, oran elephant's trunk discharging nearthe bottom of the hole where concrete segregation will be minimized, is recommended. The top of the piers should be cylindrical in shape. Forms may be necessary at the top of the piers in order to minimize the disturbance of the soils and to maintain a cylindrical shape. 4.4 Seismic Considerations Based on our subsurface exploration and laboratory testing, it is our opinion that the soils have a low risk of liquefaction. The following table presents the seismic site classification based on the 2015 International Building Code: Code Used Site Classification 2015 International Building Code (IBC) 1 D 1. In general accordance with the 2015 International Building Code 2. The 2015 International Building Code (IBC) requires a site soil profile determination extending a depth of 100 feet for seismic site classification. The current scope requested does not include the required 100 foot soil profile determination. The deepest borings of this exploration extended to a maximum depth of about 35 feet and this seismic site class definition considers that similar soil conditions exist below the maximum depth of the subsurface exploration. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 17 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon 4.5 Interior Floor Slab-on-grade floors may be utilized for the interior floor system, provided slabs-on-grade are constructed on native soils or new engineered fill, provided some slab movement can be tolerated. All existing fill must be removed and replaced with properly moisture conditioned and compacted fill below slabs-on-grade. If very little movement can be tolerated, structural floors, supported independent of the subgrade materials, are recommended. A minimum 12-inch crawlspace or void space should be used for structural floor construction. Conventional slab-on-grade construction on expansive soils, whether in their natural state or moisture-conditioned and recompacted to a certain depth will move. The severity and magnitude of movement will depend on the depth of treatment, the resulting expansion potential of these materials, and the circumstances causing future wetting. 4.5.1 Interior Floor Design Recommendations For structural design of concrete slabs-on-grade, a modulus of subgrade reaction of about 100 pounds per cubic inch (pci) may be used for point or limited area loads for slabs-on-grade supported on native soils or new engineered fill at this site. If the risk of some movement and distress is acceptable, additional floor slab design and construction recommendations are as follows: • Positive separations and/or isolation joints should be provided between slabs and all foundations, columns or utility lines to allow independent movement. • Control joints should be provided in slabs to control the location and extent of cracking. • Interior trench backfill placed beneath slabs should be compacted in accordance with recommended specifications outlined below. • For finished areas, the use of a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete slabs on grade that will be covered with wood, tile, carpet or other moisture sensitive or impervious coverings, or when the slab will support equipment sensitive to moisture. When conditions warrant the use of a vapor retarder, the slab designer and slab contractor should refer to ACI 302 for procedures and cautions regarding the use and placement of a vapor retarder. • Slabs-on-grade should not be constructed on frozen subgrade. • Other design and construction considerations, as outlined in Section 302.1 R of the AC/ Design Manual, are recommended. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 18 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon 4.5.2 Interior Floor Construction Considerations The existing fill should be removed to native soils and replaced with properly moisture conditioned and compacted engineered fill to the specifications presented in the "Earthwork" section of this report. Additional floor slab movement could occur should the floor slab supporting soils be allowed to dry out and subsequently become rewetted, possibly resulting in potential excessive movement causing uneven floor slabs and severe cracking. Future wetting could occur due to over watering of landscaping, poor drainage, improperly functioning drain systems, and/or broken utility lines. Therefore, it is imperative that the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed. 4.6 Exterior Flatwork Exterior slabs-on-grade and exterior architectural features may be constructed on native soils or new engineered fill. Exterior slabs-on-grade constructed on existing fill may experience some movement due to the volume change of the material. We recommend all existing fill, where encountered, below exteriorslabs-on-grade be overexcavated, properly moisture conditioned and compacted to grade. However if the owner is willing to accept a higher risk of movement (relative to removal of all existing fill) for exterior slabs, consideration could be given to mitigating a portion of the upper existing fill materials. Mitigation measures would consist of partial overexcavation of the existing fill materials to a depth of about 1 foot, moisture conditioning and recompaction or replacement with non-expansive imported soils. 4.6.1 Exterior Flatwork Design Recommendations For structural design of exterior concrete slabs-on-grade, a modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 pci may be used for point or limited area loads for exterior slabs-on-grade at this site. Additional slab design and construction recommendations are as follows: • Minimizing moisture increases in the backfill. • Controlling moisture-density during placement of bacl<fill. • Positive separations and/or isolation joints should be provided between exterior slabs and the building to allow independent movement. • Control joints should be provided in slabs to control the location and extent of cracking. • Exterior slabs should not be constructed on frozen subgrade Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 19 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank • Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 • Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon • Other design and construction considerations, as outlined in Section 302.1 R of the AC/ Design Manual, are recommended. 4.6.2 Exterior Flatwork Construction Considerations Movements of exterior slab-on-grades using the above technique will likely be reduced and tend to be more uniform. Additional movement could occurshould the subsurface soils become wetted to significant depths, which could result in potential excessive movement causing uneven exterior slabs and severe cracking. This could be due to over watering of landscaping, poor drainage, and/or broken utility lines. Therefore, it is imperative that the recommendations outlined in the "Grading and Drainage" section of this report be followed. 4.7 Lateral Earth Pressures We do not anticipate site walls will be constructed as part of the development of the subject site. However, we have provided the following criteria if site walls less than 4 feet in height will be considered. Reinforced concrete walls with unbalanced backfill levels on opposite sides should be designed for earth pressures at least equal to those indicated in the following table. Earth pressures will be influenced by structural design of the walls, conditions of wall restraint, methods of construction and/or compaction and the strength of the materials being restrained. Two wall restraint conditions are shown. Active earth pressure is commonly used for design of free-standing cantilever retaining walls and assumes wall movement. The "at-rest" condition assumes no wall movement. The recommended design lateral earth pressures do not include a factor of safety and do not provide for possible hydrostatic pressure on the walls. For active pressure movementS = Surcharge -0 +10.002 H to 0.004 H) For at-rest pressure No Movement Assumed Horizontal Finished Grade H Horizontal Finished Grade )( pi-+I \- - Retaining Wall Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 20 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS Earth Pressure Conditions Active (Ka) At-Rest (Ko) Coefficient For Equivalent Fluid Surcharge Earth Pressure, Backfill Typel Density (pcf)Pressure, pi (psf)P2 (psf) Granular - 0.33 35 (0.33)S (35)H Lean Clay - 0.47 50 (0.47)S (50)H Granular - 0.50 60 (0.50)S (60)H Lean Clay - 0.64 80 (0.64)S (80)H Granular- 3.0 400 --- Passive (Kp) Lean Clay - 2.1 275 --- 1. Granular materials are considered to be sands or gravels with a maximum of 20 percent passing the No. 200 sieve. Applicable conditions to the above include: • For active earth pressure, wall must rotate about base, with top lateral movements of about 0.002 H to 0.004 H, where H is wall height • For passive earth pressure to develop, wall must move horizontally to mobilize resistance. • Uniform surcharge, where S is surcharge pressure • In-situ soil backfill weight a maximum of 120 pcf • Horizontal backfill, compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density • Loading from heavy compaction equipment not included • No hydrostatic pressures acting on wall • No dynamic loading • No safety factor included in soil parameters To control hydrostatic pressure behind earth-retaining walls we recommend that a drain be installpd below the foundation of the wall with a collection pipe leading to a reliable discharge. If this is not possible, then combined hydrostatic and lateral earth pressures should be calculated for lean clay backfill using an equivalent fluid weighing 90 and 100 pef for active and at-rest conditions, respectively. For granular backfill, an equivalent fluid weighing 85 and 90 pcf should be used for active and at-rest, respectively. These pressures do not include the influence of surcharge, equipment or floor loading, which should be added. Heavy equipment should not operate within a distance closer than the exposed height of retaining walls to prevent lateral pressures more than those provided. The preceding data are applicable only to cast-in-place concrete or modular block walls up to 4 feet in height. If taller single walls, tiered walls, or Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) walls will be included in the proposed development, additional site-specific studies and laboratory testing will be required. In addition, the wall designer should perform standard wall design practices including analysis for overturning, sliding, bearing capacity and global stability, Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 21 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon and results of these analyses should be provided for our review. Additional sampling, laboratory testing and document review associated with retaining walls is beyond the original scope of work but can be performed as a separate scope, for a separate fee. 4.8 Pavement Design and Construction Design of privately maintained pavements for the project has been based on the procedures outlined by the Asphalt Institute (Al) and the American Concrete Institute (ACI). Many of the recommendations included in this section are applicable to the design and maintenance of site sidewalks and other flatwork. Pavements and flatwork constructed on existing fill have a low to moderate risk of movement. The risk of movement can be reduced to a lower level if the subgrade materials are modified by overexcavating the materials to a depth of 1 foot and properly moisture conditioning and compacting suitable on-site soils to grade. 4.8.1 Design Traffic We assumed the following design parameters for Asphalt Institute flexible pavement thickness design: • Automobile Parking Areas • Parking stalls and parking lots for cars and pick-up trucks • Main Traffic Corridors • Parking lots • Subgrade Soil Characteristics • USCS Classification - SC (Poor to Medium Subgrade) We assumed the following design parameters for ACI rigid pavement thickness design based upon the average daily truck traffic (ADTT): • Automobile Parking Areas · ACI Category A-1: Automobile parking • Main Traffic Corridors • ACI Category B: Commercial entrance and service lanes • Subgrade Soil Characteristics • USCS Classification - SC • Concrete modulus of rupture value of 600 psi We should be contacted to confirm and/or modify the recommendations contained herein if actual traffic volumes differ from the assumed values shown above. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 22 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 • Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon 4.8.2 Subgrade Soils Based on a subgrade soil Unified Soil Classification of SC, Al classifies the subgrade soil as poor to medium. Sand fill materials will be encountered at pavement construction elevation. Due to the presence of existing fill, we recommend overexcavating to a depth of at least 1 foot, moisture conditioning and recompacting the material to grade. 4.8.3 Recommended Minimum Pavement Sections and Materials Recommended alternatives for flexible and rigid pavements are summarized for each traffic area as follows: Preliminary Pavement Thickness (Inches) Traffic Area Asphalt Aggregate Portland Concrete Base Cement Total Surface Course Concrete Automobile Parking (Al Class I and ACI Category A) A 5-1/2 5-1/2 B 4 6 10 5 5 A 6-1/2 6-1/2 Main Traffic Corridors B 5 8 (Al Class 111 and ACI Category B) 1. The minimum pavement section thickness per ACI 13 6 6 Each alternative should be investigated with respect to current material availability and economic conditions. A minimum 6-inch thickness of rigid reinforced concrete pavement is recommended at the location of dumpsters where trash trucks park and load, and in areas of tight turning radius. For analysis of pavement costs, the following specifications should be considered for each pavement component: Pavement Component Colorado Department of Transportation Criteria Asphalt Concrete Surface Aggregate Base Course Portland Cement Concrete Grading S or SX Class 5 or 6 . Class P 4.8.4 Construction Considerations Site grading is generally accomplished early in the construction phase. However, as construction proceeds, the subgrade may be disturbed due to utility excavations, construction traffic, desiccation, or rainfall. As a result, the pavement subgrade may not be suitable for pavement construction and corrective action will be required. The subgrade should be carefully evaluated Responsive . Resourceful • Reliable 23 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon at the time of pavement construction for signs of disturbance or excessive rutting. If disturbance has occurred, pavement subgrade areas should be reworked, moisture conditioned, and properly compacted to the recommendations in this report immediately prior to paving. We recommend the pavement areas be rough graded and then thoroughly proof rolled with a loaded tandem axle dump truck prior to final grading and paving. Particular attention should be paid to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed earlier and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Areas where unsuitable conditions are located should be repaired by removing and replacing the materials with properly compacted fills. All pavement areas should be moisture conditioned and properly compacted to the recommendations in this report immediately prior to paving. The placement of a partial pavement thickness for use during construction is not recommended without a detailed pavement analysis incorporating construction traffic. In addition, if the actual traffic varies from the assumptions outlined above, we should be contacted to confirm and/or modify the pavement thickness recommendations outlined above. 4.8.5 Pavement Performance Future performance of pavements constructed at this site will be dependent upon several factors, including: • Maintaining stable moisture content of the subgrade soils both before and after pavement construction. • Providing for a planned program of preventative maintenance. The performance of all pavements can be enhanced by minimizing excess moisture, which can reach the subgrade soils. The following recommendations should be considered at minimum: • Site grading at a minimum 2 percent grade onto or away from the pavements. • Water should not be allowed to pond behind curbs. • Compaction of any utility trenches for landscaped areas to the same criteria as the pavement subgrade. • Sealing all landscaped areas in or adjacent to pavements or provide drains to reduce the risk of moisture migration to subgrade soils. • Placing compacted backfill against the exterior side of curb and gutter. • Placing curb, gutter and/or sidewalk directly on subgrade soils without the use of base course materials. Preventative maintenance should be planned and provided for an ongoing pavement management program in order to enhance future pavement performance. Preventative maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 24 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon Preventative maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g. crack sealing and patching) and global maintenance (e.g. surface sealing). Preventative maintenance is usually the first priority when implementing a planned pavement maintenance program. 5.0 GENERAL COMMENTS Terracon should be retained to review the final design plans and specifications so comments can be made regarding interpretation and implementation of our geotechnical recommendations in the design and specifications. Terracon also should be retained to provide observation and testing services during grading, excavation, foundation construction and other earth-related construction phases of the project. The analysis and recommendations presented in this report are based upon the data obtained from the borings performed at the indicated locations and from other information discussed in this report. This report does not reflect variations that may occur between borings, across the site, or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. If variations appear, we should be immediately notified so that further evaluation and supplemental recommendations can be provided. The scope of services for this project does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site safety, excavation support, and dewatering requirements are the responsibility of others. In the event that changes in the nature, design, or location of the project as outlined in this report are planned, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless Terracon reviews the changes and either verifies or modifies the conclusions of this report in writing. Responsive . Resourceful . Reliable 25 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 i Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon APPENDIX A FIELD EXPLORATION Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank . Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 1Ierracon Field Exploration Description The locations of borings are presented in Exhibits A-3 and A-4. The borings were located in the field by measuring with a measuring wheel from property lines and/or existing site features. The latitude and longitude coordinates of the boring locations were obtained by locating the borings on Google Earth and recording the values. The accuracy of the latitude and longitude values is typically about +/-25 feet when obtaining the values using this method. Elevations of the borings were obtained using a level and by assigning the southern rim of sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank a temporary benchmark elevation of 100.0 feet. The accuracy of the boring locations and elevations should only be assumed to the level implied by the methods used. The borings were drilled with a CME-75 truck-mounted rotary drill rig with solid-stem augers. During the drilling operations, lithologic logs of the borings were recorded by the field engineer. Relatively undisturbed samples were obtained at selected intervals utilizing a 3-inch outside diameter ring barrel sampler (RS). Penetration resistance values were recorded in a manner similar to the standard penetration test (SPT). This test consists of driving the sampler into the ground with a 140-pound hammer free-falling through a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the ring-barrel sampler 12 inches or the interval indicated, is recorded and can be correlated to the standard penetration resistance value (N-value). The blow count values are indicated on the boring logs at the respective sample depths, ring barrel sample blow counts are not considered N-values. An automatic hammer was used to advance the samplers in some of the borings performed on this site. A greater efficiency is typically achieved with the automatic hammer compared to the conventional safety hammer operated with a cathead and rope. Published correlations between the SPT values and soil properties are based on the lower efficiency cathead and rope method. This higher efficiency affects the standard penetration resistance blow count value by increasing the penetration per hammer blow over what would be obtained using the cathead and rope method. The effect of the automatic hammefs efficiency has been considered in the interpretation and analysis of the subsurface information for this report. The standard penetration test provides a reasonable indication of the in-place density of sandy type materials, but only provides an indication of the relative stiffness of cohesive materials since the blow count in these soils may be affected by the soils moisture content. In addition, considerable care should be exercised in interpreting the N-values in gravelly soils, particularly where the size of the gravel particle exceeds the inside diameter of the sampler. Groundwater measurements were obtained in the borings at the time of drilling. Due to safety concerns, borings were backfilled with auger cuttings and patched with asphalt, where applicable, after completion of drilling for this exploration. Some settlement of the backfill and patch may occur and should be repaired as soon as possible. Exhibit A-1 3 1 4 IMI-·U ./ -i- -r .. 2.fE41.1 -- :T ! m * h -1-4-9.---- 01 7---r. 4'Shopp n £4 Afff £72 iIlif *_111[I-9.-FE . ! f § 0' i.. El ..V *----·-- 2.- '7--m 54(02«46I 1-- }Efir 1.ike 0 b 1 ..0 Khodt L.- Mart/TE,Ini i.f _cr-i. *.-1......._. 61-· Lakesi»jj-enT.0-------t..tl-t :,4--i---r»·4LF·1 1 .0, OIl10 31-7id,1'2 «[ 27»-24.. t.1 --i--24 1 ·0<:noZL61ruert..j|-'77F1-5 +-trt:·14,7.- *<-«--- .=<irT..'-u .-- -- 1.:r.1 646---11'=7- Pi k f.- , i,j · .c unta iniv lew 1 -,-Re···4-;3;-2----ls€21 \' i,v - . 1 · 2-1-Ue •<? 3 t ' *it=+r--2.-Pe-12"==2=1. 4 it 4 al|11,4 S. i.j..1 CL -2 7 1, 1 fi 1 1- 1.-rl -7--rtbT-'L-:--1 4 ' - - .I . 1-9.-- A 1. , .f. f. 2 :3..A..226-_' PLIWL.'-i? I,£[Rep t ttlj 0¥1 - .1 7.61.1 -- .i. i k K41.4 :. L i & . i .--,: r»-T kj -0'3if-t321-- 1 .-irf] #4UR1 Ct -A· £ r ' .1 - L 9 ·-1. to= 1 .b, ,..Lt'E.67,#A 2/7/XSEL/-1_4 0 4.1.4-.4. + #.4 rf. i ff-r--ts-17-*c 1,·1 11,·1 --,C' 1.-Nk-/ ,-·-h-1.1..%.1 1- --;' , 1 i .42.-44.-1 2-11 1 -t; 9 -, M ip ; 10/ N -- -1 ----: "1 i =b| . 'f341.b , -,1)< - # *k1..,1 ) 14; 1 i Ni / 1 1 4445 Edgeita_f'Iff 4'1 U :FllrieL/ Sell, L_ I Medtil ¢entel Tolwn, t HlHOSC park I#k: 11 N- 34/ P. m.Ing fefvy. 1 46 3 1 - III P St_ji- ·r - 35 1 0.i It 1 j . 'ParkCart G Mor* 6 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP IMAGE COURTESY OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY QUADRANGLES INCLUDE: ARVADA, CO (1/1/1994) and FORT LOGAN, CO (1/1/1994). ager:Project No. SBM 25165385 Scale SBM 1"=2,000' JN H File Na to A-4 y: Date: SAM 10/12/16 ExhibitSITE LOCATIONlierracon PROPOSED VECTRA BANK 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 NORTHWEST OF WEST 38TH AND UPHAM STREET Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-1729 WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO A-2 TBM VP-4 VP-2 l VB-3 VE3-1 VP-3 VP-1 3 A W 38Ave 50 feet D bin4 s..%12111:Ong/lawa#KERon LEGEND Approximate Boring Location manhole cover southwest of existing bank.DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY AND IS -H Temporary Benchmark: south rim of sewer AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDEDAssigned elevation = 100.0 feet.NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS ager:Project No. SBM 25165385 Scale: SBM AS SHOWN : File Name: JNH A-2 to A-4 y: Date: SBM 10/12/16 AERIAL IMAGE EXPLORATION PLAN Exhibit1IerraconPROPOSED VECTRA BANK 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 NORTHWEST OF WEST 38™ AND UPHAM STREET A-3 Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-1729 WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO i t Vectra Bank Ur. i r LEGEND DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, AND IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES Approximate Boring Location _a Temporary Benchmark: south rim of sewer manhole cover southwest of existing bank. Assigned elevation = 100.0 feet. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY MICROSOFT BING MAPS iager:Project No. SBM 25165385 Scale: SBM AS SHOWN : like Name: JNH A-2 to A-4 ly: Date: SBM 10/12/16 EXPLORATION PLANlierracon PROPOSED VECTRA BANK 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 NORTHWEST OF WEST 38TH AND UPHAM STREET Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-1729 WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO Exhibit A-4 BORING LOG NO. VB-1 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 -dz 82 >0 >E Lu H F meLatitude: 39.7696° Longitude: -105.0787° 6 5% &Approximate Surface Elev: 98.6 (Ft.) +A o Re 5 11- 9.0 hk 14.0 18.0 -35.0 GRAPH ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI UDEPTHELEVATION (Ft.1 1 0 FILL -SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine 97.5+1--\grained, brown /-- SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained, - yellow-brown, loose to medium dense _12-15 7 114 77 7 1195- 89.5+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), calcareous, brown, very stiff 10 V 8-14 -0.1 @ 24 99, 500 psf, 84.5+/- SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium grained, brown to dark brown, medium dense slight petroleum odor at 14 feet 15- 9-11 17 117 80.5+/- CLAYSTONE ,grayish-brown to dark gray, firm to medium ha d - 20-14-17 23 101 9 18-26 24 97 25- 14-28 30- 63.5+/-50/10"35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual,Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning the south rim ofSee Appendix B for deschption of laboratory the sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS 10 feet while drilling Bonng Started: 9/26/20161IerraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165385 Boring Completed: 9/26/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-5 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/25/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. VB-2 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.7696° Longitude: -105.0789° Approximate Surface Elev: 99.3 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 U)dz m 2 M2 R8 ATTERBERG Ill - V LIMITS2 08 U ma =i 2 -6 ta LU 111 < 1- g LL-PL-PI0- 9 32 00 8 R3U. -«ASPHALT, (about 5 inches)"916- 20 FILL - SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine 97.5+/-p--Wrained, dark gray to brown E-9-11 -1.0@ 11 110SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained, - , 500 psf, , light brown, medium dense 11-11 5 070 92.5+/- -35.0 SANDY LEAN CLAY (CU, calcareous, light brown, stiff to very stiff, slight petroleum odorat 14 feet - 7-9 24 9810- 10-14 18 11015- 79.5+/- CLAYSTONE, light gray-brown, firm to medium hard 20- 14-23 +1.6 @ 25 100 , 500 psf, 50/8"25- 17-27 27 97 30- 64.5+6 50/7" 35-Boring Terminated at 35 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning the south rim ofSee Appendix B for description of laboratory the sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank anprocedures and additional data Of any)elevation of 100.0 feel Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BoMng Started: 9/26/2016 Boring Completed: 9/26/2016 11 feet while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165385 Exhibit:A-6 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG NO WELL 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/25/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. VB-3 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.7696' Longitude: -105.0789° Approximate Surface Elev: 99.9 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) 0-L+SPHALT, (about 5 inches)r99.-51,6 FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, dark gray to brown, loose 30 97+/- ATTERBERG, CO LU 52 2 LIMITS7 mit ER 1- -1 3 WE JQEd 3% %2 LL-PL-PIE-U-1 2 -9 0 Rm 6-5 CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained, brown, loose 5- 3-6 10 109 110.0 90+A 4-710--SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL). calcareous. brown. st fflilli 20.0 15- 5-7 -0.3 @ 21 106 , 500 psf, 80+/- FINE TO MEDIUM SAND (SP-SM), with silt, interbedded with layers of lean clay, brown, medium dense to dense 20-7-8 27 98 50/10"25- 15-24 15 30- 34.0 66+/- -35 0 CLAYSTONE, light grayish-brown, medium hard Boring Terminated at 35 Feet 65+A 35- 50/7" Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be, gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning the south rim ofSee Appendix B for description of laboratory the sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/26/2016 Boring Completed: 9/26/2016 12 feet while dn#ing 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165385 Exhibit:A-7 PERCENT FINES THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015,GDT 10/25/16 BORING LOG NO. VP-1 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado ATTERBERG-10 Ill c LIMITS#5 e $ M> 9%08 -Ill 1- 1- d 3 9 9@ % *G &8 LL-PL-PI= W= D= NE %66! a:0 8 0% LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.7695° Longitude: -105.0786° Approximate Surface Elev: 98.1 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) FILL - SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained, brown 96+/-:2.0 '7.0 ;10.C SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained,10-11 7 111 23-19-4 yellow-brown to light brown, medium dense - 10-9 9 110 5- 91+/- SANDY LEAN CLAY (CL), calcareous, light brown, medium stiff 88+/-4-5 2310Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning the south rim ofSee Appendix B for description of laboratory the sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank anprocedures and additional data (if any)elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with soil cuttings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/26/2016 Boring Completed: 9/26/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rjg: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165385 Exhibit:A-8 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/25/16 BORING LOG NO. VP-2 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.7698° Longitude: -105.0786° Approximate Surface Elev: 97.6 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) FILL - SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, finegrained, brown2.0 95.5+/- gE 2% W £5 3 0 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SIVIL trace gravel, fine grained,5-7 8 110 23-18-5 light brown, loose '115.0 92 5+/- 5 6-7 Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method:See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning the south rim ofSee Appendix B for description of laboratory the sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with soil cultings upon completion.abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/26/2016 Boring Completed: 9/26/2016 None encountered while drilling 1Ierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165385 Exhibit:A-9 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/25/16 PERCENT FINES BORING LOG NO. VP-3 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado o LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 0 2 Latitude: 39.7695° Longitude: -105.079° I Approximate Surface Elev: 100.0 (Ft.) +/- DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.1 alASPHALT, (about 4 inches)/1€-5» FILL - CLAYEY SAND (SC), trace gravel, fine grained,98+/-nbrown E-. brown. medium denseCLAYEY SAND (SO, trace gravel, fine grained, light 9•1•2 2.0 7.0 ATTERBERGLOO Ill -2 0 LIMITSEd 0 K - 6 ER329% m PE J 0% ge E 2% %E LL-PL-PI<00 5 Wor RE a 0 R 9-10 8 109 25-15-10 10-12 7 118 5 93+/- SILTY SAND (SM), fine to medium grained, brown, loose 10.0 90+/-6-710Boring Terminated at 10 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning the south rim ofSee Appendix B for description of laboratory the sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. Abandonment Method:See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and patched with abbreviations. asphalt upon completion. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Boring Started: 9/26/2016 Boring Completed: 9/26/2016 None encountered while drilling lierracon Drill Rig: CME-75 Driller: Terracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165385 Exhibit:A-10 THIS BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/25/16 BORING LOG NO. VP-4 Page 1 of 1 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado SITE:Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado LOCATION See Exhibit A-2 Latitude: 39.7698° Longitude: -105.079° Approximate Surface Elev: 98.7 (Ft.) +A DEPTH ELEVATION (Ft.) ea *W R 8 ATTERBERG LIMITS LL-PL-PI 15.0 ASPHALT, (about 5 inches)detFILL - SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine 0rained, brown -5-6 8 22-16-6SILTY CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM), trace gravel, fine grained, light brown, loose _ 93.5+2- 5Boring Terminated at 5 Feet Stratification lines are approximate. In-situ, the transition may be gradual.Hammer Type: Automatic Advancement Method: 4-inch diameter continuous flight auger Abandonment Method: Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and patched with asphalt upon completion. See Exhibit A-1 for description of field Notes: procedures Elevation obtained using a level and assigning the south rim ofSee Appendix B for description of laboratory the sewer manhole cover southwest of the existing bank anprocedures and additional data (if any).elevation of 100.0 feet. See Appendix C for explanation of symbols and abbreviations. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS None encountered while drilling Boring Started: 9/26/20161IerraconDrill Rig: CME-75 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO Project No.: 25165385 Boring Completed: 9/26/2016 Driller: Terracon Exhibit:A-11 TI"9 BORING LOG IS NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GEO SMART LOG-NO WELL 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/25/16 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 . Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon APPENDIX B LABORATORY TESTING Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016. Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon Laboratory Testing Description Samples retrieved during the field exploration were returned to the laboratory for observation by the projed geotechnical engineer, and were classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System and the Description of Rock Properties presented in Appendix C. At this time, an applicable laboratory-testing program was formulated to determine engineering properties of the subsurface materials. Following the completion of the laboratory testing, the field descriptions were confirmed or modified as necessary, and the Boring Logs were prepared. The Boring Logs are included in Appendix A. Laboratory test results are included in Appendix B. These results were used for the geotechnical engineering analyses and the development of foundation, earthwork and pavement recommendations. All laboratory tests were performed in general accordance with the applicable local or other accepted standards. Selected soil and bedrock samples were tested for the following engineering properties: • Water content •Atterberg limits • Dry density •Swell/consolidation • Grain size distribution •Water soluble sulfate content Exhibit B-1 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM D4546 10 8 6 4 2 00- -2 \ -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % I VB-1 9-10 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY 99 24 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank PROJECT NUMBER: 25165385SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave and lerracon CLIENT: Vectra Bank of ColoradoUpham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO EXHIBIT: B-2 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165385.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 10/25/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM 04546 10 8 6 4 2 OC _ . -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification 0&, pef WC, % I VB-2 2-3 ft CLAYEY SAND 110 11 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank PROJECT NUMBER: 25165385SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave and lerracon CLIENT: Vectra Bank of ColoradoUpham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO EXHIBIT: B-3 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165385.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 10/25/16 AXIAI RTRAIN O/6 SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM D4546 10 8 6 4 2 OC- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, pef WC, % I VB-2 19-20 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY 100 25 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank PROJECT NUMBER: 25165385SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave and lerracon CLIENT: Vectra Bank of ColoradoUpham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO EXHIBIT: B-4 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOL_STRAIN-USCS 25165385.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 10/25/16 AYIAI CTRAIN Ok SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST ASTM D4546 10 8 4 2 094- -2 -4 -6 -8 -10 100 1,000 10,000 PRESSURE, psf Specimen Identification Classification ld, pef WC, % I VB-3 14-15 ft SANDY LEAN CLAY 106 21 NOTES: Water added at 500 psf PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank PROJECT NUMBER: 25165385SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave and lerracon CLIENT: Vectra Bank of ColoradoUpham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO EXHIBIT: B-5 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. TC_CONSOLSTRAIN-USCS 25165385.GPJ TERRACON_DATATEMPLATE.GDT 10/25/16 AXIAI RTRAIN 04 GRAIN SIZE DISTRIBUTION ASTM D422 / ASTM C136 U.S. SIEVE OPENING IN INCHES I U.S. SIEVE NUMBERS I HYDROMETER 4 2 1 1/2 3 66322 10.1648 14 20 100 95 90 30 40 50 60 100 140 200 % CD 85 80 75 70 65 An 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 100 10 1 I I .4 \14 >55 I I ./. 0/ W 50 LL 1- 45 Z LLI 40 LU a. *%\ i 0.1 0.01 0.001 GRAIN SIZE IN MILLIMETERS GRAVEL SAND COBBLES SILT OR CLAY coarse fine coarse medium fine Boring ID Depth USCS Classification AASHTO Classification WC (°/o) LL PL PI Cc CU I VP-1 0-5 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM)A-4 (0) 23 19 4 VP-2 0-5 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND with GRAVEL A-2-4 (0) 23 18 5 (SC-AM) A VP-3 0-5 CLAYEY SAND (SC)A-4 (0) 25 15 10 * VP-4 0 - 5 SILTY, CLAYEY SAND (SC-SM)A-2-4 (0) 22 16 6 Boring ID Depth 0100 060 D30 Dio *Gravel %Sand %Silt %Fines %Clay VP-1 0 - 5 19 0.22 13.4 50.7 35.8 VP-2 0 - 5 19 0.375 17.8 50.8 31.4 A VP-3 0-5 12.5 0.167 3.0 60.1 36.9 * VP-4 0-5 9.5 0.197 1.4 65.7 32.9 PROJECT: Proposed Vectra Bank SITE: Northwest of W 38th Ave and Upham St Wheat Ridge, Colorado 1Ierracon 10625 W I 70 Frontage Rd N Ste 3 Wheat Ridge, CO PROJECT NUMBER: 25165385 CLIENT: Vectra Bank of Colorado EXHIBIT: B-6 LABORATORY TESTS ARE NOT VALID IF SEPARATED FROM ORIGINAL REPORT. GRAIN SIZE: USCS & AASHTO COMBINED 25165385.GPJ TERRACON2015.GDT 10/25/16 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed Vectra Bank - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165385 Boring No.Depth (ft.)USCS Class. Swell/Consolidation Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight Initial Dry Initial Water Density (pcf)Content (%)Surcharge Swell (%)3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200 (ksf) Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks VB-1 2 SC-SM 114 7 4 VB-1 4 SC-SM 119 7 4 VB-1 9 CL 99 24 0.5 -0.1 3,4 VB-1 14 SM 117 17 4 VB-1 19 101 23 4 VB-1 24 97 24 4 VB-2 2 SC-SM 110 11 0.5 -1.0 3,4 Ve-2 9 CL 98 24 4 VB-2 14 CL 110 18 4 VB-2 19 CL 100 25 0.5 +1.6 3,4 VB-2 29 97 27 4 VB-3 4 SC 109 10 4 VB-3 14 CL 106 21 0.5 -0.3 4 VB-3 19 CL 98 27 3,4 VB-3 29 SP-SM 15 4 VP-1 0-5 SC-SM 100 87 82 74 36 23 4 1 VP-1 2 SC-SM 111 7 4 VP-1 4 SC-SM 110 9 4 VP-1 9 CL 23 4 VP-2 0-5 SC-SM 100 82 74 62 31 23 5 VP-2 2 SC-SM 110 8 4 VP-3 0-5 SC Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP =non-plastic 100 97 95 86 37 25 10 Remarks: Exhibit B-71 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only lierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D1557/AASHTO T180 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS Proposed Vectra Bank - Wheat Ridge, Colorado Terracon Project No. 25165385 Boring No.Depth (ft.)USCS Class. Swell/Consolidation Initial Dry Initial Water Density (pcf)Content (%)Surcharge Swell (%)(ksf) Particle Size Distribution, Percent Passing by Weight 3/4" #4 #10 #40 #200 Atterberg Limits LL PI Water Soluble Sulfates (mg/1) Remarks VP-3 2 SC 109 8 4 VP-3 4 SC 118 7 4 VP-4 0-5 SC-SM VP-4 2 SC-SM Notes: Initial Dry Density and Initial Water Content are in-situ values unless otherwise noted. * = Partially disturbed sample - = Compression/settlement NV = no value NP = non-plastic 100 99 97 83 33 22 6 1 8 4 Remarks: 1 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D698 maximum density near optimum moisture content)Exhibit B-8 2 Remolded Compacted density (about 95% of ASTM D1557 maximum density near optimum moisture content) 3 Water added to sample 4 Dry density and/or moisture content determined from one ring of a multi-ring sample 5 Minus #200 Only 1Ierracon 6 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM D698/AASHTO T99 7 Moisture-Density Relationship Test Method ASTM 01557/AASHTO T180 Geotechnical Engineering Report Proposed Vectra Bank. Wheat Ridge, Colorado October 25, 2016 i Terracon Project No. 25165385 lierracon APPENDIX C SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS GENERAL NOTES DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS ID I _SZ_ Water Initially (HP)Hand Penetrometer Encountered Auger Shelby Tube Split Spoon 0 I H ' Rock Macro Modified 1 Core Core California : Ring Sampler 1-1 U Grab No Modified Sample Recovery Dames & Moore Ring Sampler Water Level After a Specified Period of Time 7 Water Level After LU a Specified Period of Time> Water levels indicated on the soil boring ct logs are the levels measured in the W borehole at the times indicated. Groundwater level variations will occur 2 over time. In low permeability soils, accurate determination of groundwater levels is not possible with short term water level observations. (T) Torvane (b/f)Standard Penetration Test (blows per foot) N N value (PID)Photo-Ionization Detector (OVA) Organic Vapor Analyzer DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION Soil classification is based on the Unified Soil Classification System. Coarse Grained Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; their principal descriptors are: boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are principally described as clays if they are plastic, and silts if they are slightly plastic or non-plastic. Major constituents may be added as modifiers and minor constRuents may be added according to the relative proportions based on grain size. In addition to gradation, coarse-grained soils are defined on the basis of their in-place relative density and fine-grained soils on the basis of their consistency. LOCATON AND ELEVATION NOTES Unless otherwise noted, Latitude and Longitude are approximately determined using a hand-held GPS device. The accuracy of such devices is variable. Surface elevation data annotated with +A indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted to confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area. RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSE-GRAINED SOILS (More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve.) Density determined by Standard Penetration Resistance Includes qravels. sands and silts. CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS BEDROCK (50% or more passing the No. 200 sieve.) Consistency determined by laborator'y shear strength testing, field visual-manual procedures or standard penetration resistance Descriptive Terrn (Density) Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Ring Descriptive Unconfined Sampler Term Compressive Blows/Ft. (Consistency)Strength, Qu, psf Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Ring Ring Sampler Sampler Blows/Ft.Blows/Ft. Standard Penetration or N-Value Blows/Ft. Descriptive Terrn (Consistency) Very Loose 0-3 0-6 Very Soft less than 500 0-1 <3 <30 <20 Weathered Loose 4-9 7-18 Soft 500 to 1,000 2-4 3-4 30 - 49 20 - 29 Firm Medium Dense 10-29 19-58 Medium-Stiff 1,000 to 2.000 5-7 5-9 50-89 30 - 49 Medium Hard Dense 30 - 50 59 - 98 Stiff 2,000 to 4,000 8-14 10 - 18 90-119 50-79 Hard Very Dense >50 Z 99 Very Stiff 4,000 to 8.000 15-30 19-42 >119 >79 Very Hard Hard >8.000 >30 >42 RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF SAND AND GRAVEL GRAIN SIZE TERMINOLOGY Descriptive Termis) of other constituents Percent of Drv Weight Maior Component of Sample Particle Size Trace <15 Boulders Over 12 in. (300 mm) With 15-29 Cobbles 12 in. to 3 in. (300mm to 75mm) Modifier >30 Gravel 3 in. to #4 sieve (75mm to 4.75 mm) Sand #4 to #200 sieve (4.75mm to 0.075mm Silt or Clay Passing #200 sieve (0.075mm) RELATIVE PROPORTIONS OF FINES PLASTICITY DESCRIPTION Descriptive Term(s)Percent of of other constituents Dry Weight Trace <5 With 5-12 Modifier >12 Term Plasticitv Index Non-plastic 0 Low 1-10 Medium 11 - 30 High >30 1brracon Exhibit C-1 UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Soil Classification Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Group Group Name BSymbol Coarse Grained Soils: More than 50% retained on No. 200 sieve Fine-Grained Soils: 50% or more passes the No. 200 sieve Highly organic soils: Gravels:Clean Gravels: More than 50% of Less than 5% fines c coarse fraction retained Gravels with Fines: on No. 4 sieve More than 12% fines C Sands:Clean Sands: 50% or more of coarse Less than 5% fines D fraction passes No. 4 Sands with Fines: sieve More than 12% fines D Inorganic: Silts and Clays: Liquid limit less than 50 Organic: Inorganic: Silts and Clays: Liquid limit 50 or more Organic: Cu 2 4 and 1 s Cc5 3E Cu <4 and/or 1 >Cc>3E Fines classify as ML or MH Fines classify as CL or CH Cu 26 and 1 g Cc 5 3E Cu <6 and/or 1 >Cc>3E Fines classify as ML or MH Fines classify as CL or CH PI > 7 and plots on or above "A" line'J PI < 4 or plots below "A" line Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75Liquid limit - not dried PI plots on or above "PC line PI plots below "A" line Liquid limit - oven dried < 0.75Liquid limit - not dried , and organic odorPrimarily organic matter, dark in color GW Well-graded gravel F GP Poorly graded gravel F GM Silty gravel F,G,H GC Clayey gravel F,GH SW Well-graded sand SP Poorly graded sand ' SM Silty sand G,H,1 SC Clayey sand GH, CL Lean clay 1<,[,M ML Silt KLM Organic clay K.L.M,N 0L Organic silt KLM,O CH Fat clay KL,191 MH Elastic Silt K,L,M Organic clay K,L,MP 0H Organic silt K.L.M.Q PT Peat A Based on the material passing the 3-inch (75-mm) sieve B If field sample contained cobbles or boulders, or both, add i'with cobbles or boulders, or both" to group name. c Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW-GM well-graded gravel with silt, GW-GC well-graded gravel with clay, GP-GM poorly graded gravel with silt, GP-GC poorly graded gravel with clay. Sands with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: SW-SM well-graded sand with silt, SW-SC well-graded sand with clay, SP-SM poorly graded sand with silt, SP-SC poorly graded sand with clay (D)2ECll = [)60/[ho CC= D x D 10 60 F If soil contains 2 15% sand, add "with sand" to group name. G If fines classify as CL-ML, use dual symbol GC-GM, or SC-SM. H If fines are organic, add "with organic fines" to group name. ' If soil contains 2 15% gravel, add "with gravel" to group name. J If Atterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL-ML, silty clay. '< If soil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 200, add "with sand" or "with gravel," whichever is predominant. L If soil contains 330% plus No. 200 predominantly sand, add "sandy" to group name. M If soil contains 230% plus No. 200, predominantly gravel, add "gravelly" to group name. N Pl 24 and plots on or above "A" line. 0 Pl < 4 or plots below "A" line. Pl plots on or above "A" line. 0 Pl plots below "A" line. 60 1 I i 1For classification offine-grained A soils and fine-grained fraction , 50 - of coarse-grained soils 0/ 6, '' ,04/ Equation of "A" - line 4/ Horizontal at PI=4 to LL=25.5. 40 - then Pl=0.73 (LL-20) Equation of "U" - line Vertical at LL=16 to , 30 - then PI-0.9 (LL-8) /5 . 20 ' 1 6d./ 1 ' 1 MH or OH 10 / ML or OL 0 10 16 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 LIQUID LIMIT (LL) 1Ierracon Exhibit C-2 DESCRIPTION OF ROCK PROPERTIES WEATHERING Fresh Rock fresh, crystals bright, few joints may show slight staining. Rock rings under hammer if crystalline. Very slight Rock generally fresh, joints stained, some joints may show thin clay coatings, crystals in broken face show bright. Rock rings under hammer if crystalline. Slight Rock generally fresh, joints stained, and discoloration extends into rock up to 1 in. Joints may contain clay. In granitoid rocks some occasional feldspar crystals are dull and discolored. Crystalline rocks ring under hammer. Moderate Significant portions of rock show discoloration and weathering effects. In granitoid rocks, most feldspars are dull and discolored; some show clayey. Rock has dull sound under hammer and shows significant loss of strength as compared with fresh rock. Moderately severe All rock except quartz discolored or stained. In granitoid rocks, all feldspars dull and discolored and majority show kaolinization. Rock shows severe loss of strength and can be excavated with geologist's pick. Severe All rock except quartz discolored or stained. Rock "fabric" clear and evident, but reduced in strength to strong soil. In granitoid rocks, all feldspars kaolinized to some extent. Some fragments of strong rock usually left. Very severe All rock except quartz discolored or stained. Rock "fabric" discernible, but mass effectively reduced to "soil" with only fragments of strong rock remaining. Complete Rock reduced to "soil". Rock "fabric" not discernible or discernible only in small, scattered locations. Quartz may be present as dikes or stringers. HARDNESS (for engineering description of rock - not to be confused with Moh's scale for minerals) Very hard Cannot be scratched with knife or sharp pick. Breaking of hand specimens requires several hard blows of geologist's pick. Hard Can be scratched with knife or pick only with difficulty. Hard blow of hammer required to detach hand specimen. Moderately hard Can be scratched with knife or pick. Gouges or grooves to M in. deep can be excavated by hard blow of point of a geologist's pick. Hand specimens can be detached by moderate blow. Medium Can be grooved or gouged 1/16 in. deep by firm pressure on knife or pick point. Can be excavated in small chips to pieces about 1 -in. maximum size by hard blows of the point of a geologist's pick. Soft Can be gouged or grooved readily with knife or pick point. Can be excavated in chips to pieces several inches in size by moderate blows of a pick point. Small thin pieces can be broken by finger pressure. Very soft Can be carved with knife. Can be excavated readily with point of pick. Pieces 1 -in. or more in thickness can be broken with finger pressure. Can be scratched readily by fingernail. Joint, Bedding, and Foliation Spacing in Rock a Spacing Joints Bedding/Foliation Less than 2 in.Very close Very thin 2 in. - 1 ft.Close Thin 1 ft. - 3 ft.Moderately close Medium 3 ft.-10 ft.Wide Thick More than 10 ft.Very wide Very thick a. Spacing refers to the distance normal to the planes, of the described feature, which are parallel to each other or nearly so. Rock Quality Designator (RQD) a RQD, as a percentage Diagnostic description Exceeding 90 Excellent 90 - 75 Good 75 - 50 Fair 50 - 25 Poor Less than 25 Very poor a. RQD (given as a percentage) = length of core in pieces 4 in. and longer/length of run. Joint Openness Descriptors Openness Descriptor No Visible Separation Tight Less than 1/32 in.Slightly Open 1/32 to 1/8 in.Moderately Open 1/8 to 3/8 in.Open 3/8 in. to 0.1 ft.Moderately Wide Greater than 0.1 ft.Wide References: American Society of Civil Engineers. Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice - No. 56. Subsurface Investigation for Desian and Construction of Foundations of Buildings. New York: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1976. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, Enaineerina Geoloqv Field Manual. 1Ierracon Exhibit C-3 WEST END 38 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY Prepared for: Wazee Partners, LLC 2300 15th Street, Suite 325 Denver, CO 80202 Prepared by: Felsburg Holt & Ullevig -tv........ 4/Pri» 6300 South Syracuse Way, Suite 600 WRIte.,1622\Centennial, CO 80111 hdAA€*C. LfrAY,1* (303) 721-1440 CT.t- 4924i--) B Project Manager: Devin C. Joslin, PE, PTOE .4:10%11:.0Principal: Christopher J. Fasching, PE, PTOE Nk88/N December 2016 FHU Reference No. 116255-01 l 't City of4 Wheat Ridge -' PUBLIC WORKS Traffic Study Checklist Project N*ne:451- E.2 3%Project Location: 3%1* et· UphaMA st. Date: 12 < 0% I lo Engineer:'De/1-¥1 C. LIe'S ltv\ G Introduction £ Land Use, Site and Study Area Boundaries Id Size of parcel U General terrain features -pleil& flat4 Location w/in City 63' Region of City 0 Adjacent roadways w/ characteristics Li Vicinity map w/ transportation system 0 Existing and Proposed Site Uses 4 Existing zoning categories Efirrip Distribution [28/6 distribution in N, S, E, & W [2'Map of street distribution [2Trip Assignment N % distribution at each access & intersection Diagram of each access & intersection GfExisting and Projected Traffi c Volumes EI Diagrams showing in/out & turning for each access, intersection, & street m Proposed zoning categories - 40 oha,\,e,Specific proposed uses [3' Existing and Proposed Uses in Vicinity of Site w/ map 0 Existing zoning and uses m Vacant land w/ future use - rede@lop une.t Existing and Proposed Roadways and Intersections w/ map 0 Volumes of streets & intersections 4- Geometrics & traffic signal control m Future improvements w/ schedule, agency, & funding Trip Generation and Design Hour Volumes 0 Summary table 63'Each type of land use w/ size 190' Average trip rates w/ ADT & am & pm peak of site or streets 63 Total trips with site and streets 4 am peak hour site traffic 12prn peak hour site traffic 0 am peak hour total traffic for current & 20-yr 4 pm peak hour total traffic for current & 20 yr El Other peak hour total traffic for current& 20yr- 40 other b-•e fer'd Azal·{Eed0' Existing total daily traffic for streets 4 Projected total daily traffic for streets for current 0 Projected total daily traffic for streets for 20-yr 0 Traffic count data and analysis worksheets Volume projections for background traffic growth Iii'''Existing daily volumes traffic based on counts not estimates ' Ur.21=22.1 1,737,'<2J l_._.____JU---ij I A West End 38 Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae I. INTRODUCTION 1 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 A. Zoning and Surrounding Land Uses 4 B. Existing Street Network 4 C. Traffic Volumes 5 D. Crash Data Review 5 E. Traffic Operations 6 111. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT 8 A. Trip Generation Estimates 8 B. Site Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment 10 IV.2040 BACKGROUND (WITHOUT SITE) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS---------------------------13 A. 2040 Background Traffic Volumes 13 B. 2040 Background Traffic Operations 13 V. 2040 TOTAL (WITH SITE) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 15 A. 2040 Total Traffic Volumes 15 B. 2040 Total Traffic Operations 15 VI.RECOMMENDEDIMPROVEMENTS 17 VII.SUMMARY 18 LIST OF APPENDICES APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA APPENDIX B EXISTING TRAFFIC LOS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX C 2040 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC LOS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D 2040 TOTAL TRAFFIC LOS WORKSHEETS HOLT &/v FELSBURG ULLEVIG West End 38 Tra#ic Impact Study LIST OF FIGURES Paae Figure 1.Vicinity Map 2 Figure 2.Site Plan 3 Figure 3.Existing Traffic Conditions 7 Figure 4.Trip Distribution 11 Figure 5.Site-Generated Traffic 12 Figure 6.2040 Background Traffic Conditions 14 Figure 7.2040 Total Traffic Conditions 16 LIST OF TABLES Paae Table 1.Crash Data Summary 6 Table 2.Trip Generation Rates 9 Table 3.Trip Generation Estimates-Proposed Redevelopment 9 Table 4.Net Increase in Trip Generation 10 FELSBURGHOLT & ULLEVIG West End 38 Traffic Impact Study 1. INTRODUCTION The West End 38 project is proposing to redevelop a 2.83-acre site that is located to the north of 38th Avenue between Vance Street and Upham Street in the east-central region of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. Figure 1 depicts the redevelopment site's location. The land uses that are currently operating on the site include Vectra Bank (3,500 square feet [SF]), Wheat Ridge Localworks (1,375 SF), a Farmers Insurance agency (1,250 SF), and All Schools Apparel (6,125 SF). All Schools Apparel is a school uniform supply store with minimal staff and limited hours of operation. These four land uses are contained within a two-story, 12,250 SF building. A 3,100 SF building that was formerly occupied by D&A Auto Services, Inc. is located near the northeast corner of the site. Figure 2 illustrates the proposed redevelopment plan. The site is currently zoned Mixed UseCommercial (MU-C) and is planned to be redeveloped with 155 market-rate apartmdnt dwelling units and a 7,707 SF retail building. In addition, the existing Vectra Bank is planned to be relocated into a new, two-story 4,667 SF building on a separate pad site. Parking is planned to be provided in a new, 236-space parking garage, along with a total of 38 surface parking spaces. On-street parking is also planned to be provided along the site's frontage to Upham Street and 38th Avenue. The proposed land uses and parking garage are anticipated to be fully built-out by the fourth quarter of 2018. Access to the redeveloped site is proposed via Vance Street, Upham Street, and 38th Avenue. The two existing site accesses to Vance Street are planned to remain. The east access to the parking garage is planned to be located onto Upham Street approximately 375-feet north of 38th Avenue. An access is proposed to 38th Avenue aligning opposite the south leg of Upham Street. This access is planned to serve left and right turn movements entering the site from 38th Avenue. A new right-out only access is proposed onto 38th Avenue 100-feet west of the inbound only access. For purposes of the analyses performed, the two proposed site access driveways to 38th Avenue were consolidated into one intersection aligning opposite the south leg of Upham Street. The study area for this report includes the following intersections in the vicinity of the site: 1. 38th Avenue/Vance Street 2. 38th Avenue/Upham Street (south leg) 3. 38th Avenue/Upham Street (north leg) 4. 38th Avenue/Teller Street 5. 38th Avenue/High Court This traffic impact study estimates the traffic impacts associated with the West End 38 redevelopment project and identifies any resultant street or traffic control improvements. The long term (2040) future planning horizon has been evaluated, consistent with the Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) regional travel demand model and the City of Wheat Ridge requirements for evaluation of 20-year traffic projections. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEV10 Page 1 m 3 m ·C 0 k CO 44th Ave. k 44th Ave. PROJECT SITE 38th Ave. 6 38th Ave. 32nd Ave. 00,0.-'--··-*--32nd Ave. m //A FELSBURG HOLT &ULLEVIG Figure I Vicinity Map kloc'-0"LP - 11 0 1 h I i I I W i.1.-ii i 7-1 I 111 IHAbM MUUM--1 TRASH COMPACTOPh I 11 ¥ 15'x 40' -mr ri2 i ?Ifti,=__ rOUTDOOR AMENITY 1& POOL 1 UNIT28 13 C UNIT lA L=£3 . 1 3 F•r 2( 1 L d. I UNF IB, 4 9 rl CHEMICAL STORAGE - WM LicABANA POOLSTORAGE -,r 1 2& /1 n n LSURFACE PARKING:- 1 26 SPACES :UNI11Afi | k,Un-n.»-1 . | UNIT 04 UNT 04 41 1 it 7-" 6 - 1+ 2,4 ELEC I UNIfLY illf- -12 8 *44 jp| LL=112 31 lipl P 1 47. L i UNIT 20 UN't IA UNIT lA I uNIT lA UNI} lA UNk lA · r=. UNIT LAJ YBEF LOUNGE t/12 l.|NIT 1.405 SF afl EEC f O 0 . 0 , OFFICE : f32£ ENTRHCTlON 3:FiCE I46SF FITNESS YOGA .01.1 =11, 806 SF UNTPICKUP 1 9->i ce=v-·-,94==«4 .En-ry-9-1 7.--: .91--------- J 11 11111111 I 40 N BANK PARKING: | 1 -12 SPACES J 0 0 VTRABAI · [azz] RETAIL <Tmh 1.FY 1 -19 1 11 11 b.*=3 ) . ,r-1 -- /--IN 9 4iti / Il ©T U 1 4 1 *lunt¢ 38TH AVE Sil / FELSBURG4 HOLT & - igure 2 :e Plan (D \ 1 , i . : a-= 1 11'-m- UNT lA 11 F - DN 1 1 11-7 Al 1· M' UNIT 2F .. West End 38 Traffic Impact Study 11. EXISTING CONDITIONS A. Zoning and Surrounding Land Uses The City of Wheat Ridge Official Zoning Map indicates that the redevelopment site is currently zoned Mixed Use Commercial (MU-C). Many of the parcels directly fronting 38th Avenue between Wadsworth Boulevard and Sheridan Boulevard are currently zoned Mixed Use Neighborhood (MU-N). The land uses that are currently operating on the site include Vectra Bank (3,500 SF), Wheat Ridge Localworks (1,375 SF), a Farmers Insurance agency (1,250 SF), and All Schools Apparel (6,125 SF). All Schools Apparel is a school uniform supply store with , minimal staff and limited hours of operation. These four land uses are contained within a two- story, 12,250 SF building. A 3,100 SF building that was formerly occupied by D&A Auto Services, Inc. is located near the northeast corner of the site. Other existing land uses immediately adjacent to the redevelopment site include: Wheat Ridge Marketplace (with a Safeway anchor and other restaurant, retail and bank uses), a gas station/convenience store, the Wheat Ridge Medical & Office Complex, and Stevens Elementary School that is located to the east of the site across Upham Street. B. Existing Street Network 38th Avenue, Vance Street, and Upham Street demarcate the site's southern, western, and eastern boundaries, respectively. Other streets within the study area include Teller Street and High Court. The following describes the roadways in the immediate area. • 38th Avenue is an east-west Principal Arterial which extends from near 1-70 to Park Avenue (in Denver). Between Vance Street and Upham Street (south leg), 38th Avenue facilitates a five-lane cross-section that includes two through lanes in each direction and a center, two-way left turn lane (TWLTL). To the east of Upham Street's north leg, 38th Avenue narrows to a three-lane cross-section comprised of one through lane in each direction, a center TWLTL, bike lanes in both directions, and an on-street parking lane on the south side. The posted speed limit on 38th Avenue in the vicinity of the site is 35 miles per hour (mph). • Vance Street is a two-lane, north-south local street with connectivity between 38th Avenue and 36th Avenue in the vicinity of the site. To the north of 38th Avenue, Vance Street serves as an access drive through the Wheat Ridge Marketplace. The intersection with 38th Avenue is signalized, and the traffic signal operates with two phases (no protected left turn phasing). The southbound approach is striped with a shared left turn/through lane and a separate right turn lane. The speed limit on Vance Street is 25 mph. • Upham Street is a two-lane, north-south local street. The intersection of Upham Street with 38th Avenue is an offset intersection in which the southern leg is located 200-feet to the west of the northern leg. In the vicinity of the site, Upham Street has connectivity between 36th Avenue and 44th Avenue. The speed limit is 25 mph. • Teller Street is a two-lane, north-south local street with continuity between Colfax Avenue and 38th Avenue. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. • High Court extends for one block between 38h Avenue and 3gth Avenue and provides access to Stevens Elementary School. High Court also extends to the south from FELSBURG H O LT & ULLEVIG Page 4 West End 38 Trajfic Impact Study 38h Avenue as a two-lane local street that terminates at 35th Avenue. The intersection with 38th Avenue is signalized, and the traffic signal operates with two phases (no protected left turn phasing). The southbound approach to the intersection has a separate left turn lane and a shared through/right turn lane. The speed limit on High Court is 25 mph. C. Traffic Volumes Peak hour intersection turning movements were recorded at five intersections, including: 1. 38th Avenue/Vance Street 2. 38th Avenue/Upham Street (south leg) 3. 38th Avenue/Upham Street (north leg) 4. 38th Avenue/Teller Street 5. 38th Avenue/High Court The traffic counts were collected in 15-minute intervals between the hours of 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM. The traffic counts for the morning peak period were recorded on a day when Stevens Elementary School was in session. The evening peak period counts were conducted in both June and November 2016. The PM peak hour traffic volumes, however, are assumed to be relatively unaffected by the proximity of the site to Stevens Elementary School since the commuter peak period occurs after the afternoon school dismissal period. The eastbound and westbound peak hour through traffic volumes on 38th Avenue range between 475 and 700 vehicles per hour (vph). The PM peak hour traffic along 38th Avenue is greater than the AM peak hour. The eastbound and southbound left turn movements at the 38th Avenue/Vance Street intersection are the next highest movements within the study area and both exceed 100 vph during the PM peak hour. Daily traffic volumes were recorded in November 2016 on 38h Avenue east of Vance Street. The data indicate that the segment of 38th Avenue along the site's southern boundary currently carries approximately 14,700 vehicles per day (vpd). Figure 3 depicts the existing traffic volumes, intersection geometrics, and traffic control. Appendix A contains the traffic count data sheets. D. Crash Data Review Crash data for the five-year period from 2011 through 2015 was reviewed for the Vance Street, Upham Street, Teller Street, and High Court intersections with 38th Avenue. Table 1 summarizes the total number of crashes that occurred during each year. The highest number of crashes occurred at the 38th Avenue/Vance Street intersection. A total of 35 crashes, four of which resulted in an injury, occurred at this intersection. Broadside crashes were the most prevalent crash type, with a total of 15. In 11 of the 15 broadside crashes, a vehicle traveling through the intersection in the westbound direction was involved. Seven of the broadside crashes occurred between the hours of 7:00 to 9:00 AM and 4:00 to 6:00 PM. Rear end crashes were the next most prevalent type, with a total of seven (three in the westbound direction and two in the eastbound and southbound directions). The 38th Avenue/Upham Street intersection experienced the next highest number of crashes, with a total of 13 crashes, one of which resulted in an injury. No crash patterns were evident. A total of 10 crashes were recorded at the Teller Street and High Court intersections with 38th Avenue. No crash patterns were evident at either intersection. FELSBURG H 0 LT & ULLEVIG Page 5 West End 38 Traffic Impact Study Table 1.Crash Data Summary Intersection Number of Crashes 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total Avg./Yr. 38h Ave/ Vance St 38h Ave/ Upham St 38h Ave/ Teller St38h Ave/ High Ct 6 8 7 5 9 35 7 2 3 3 5 0 13 2.6 0 1 1 1 1 4 0.8 0 1 1 1 3 6 1.2 E. Traffic Operations Figure 3 also depicts intersection Level of Service (LOS) results. LOS is a qualitative measure of traffic operational conditions, based on roadway capacity and motorist delay. The Highway Capacity Manual, 2010 (HCM 2010),by the Transportation Research Board, defines six levels of service, ranging from A to F, with LOS A representing the best possible operating conditions and LOS F representing over-capacity, or congested conditions. For unsignalized intersections, LOS is calculated for movements that must yield right-of-way to other traffic movements. For signalized traffic control, LOS represents an average of the delays for all movements at the intersection. The City of Wheat Ridge LOS standards indicate that LOS C is the design objective for all movements and that under no circumstances will less than LOS D be accepted for site and non-site traffic including existing traffic at build-out of the study area. Existing traffic signal timings for the intersections of Vance Street and High Court with 38th Avenue were obtained from City of Wheat Ridge staff and were used in the analysis of existing conditions. Of note, the lane utilization factor for the eastbound through movements on 38th Avenue at Vance Street was adjusted to account for the unbalanced usage that results from termination of the second eastbound through lane at Upham Street. At the intersection of 38th Avenue with the south leg of Upham Street, it was assumed that the eastbound through lane that terminates at the intersection functions as an exclusive eastbound right turn lane, rather than a shared through/right turn lane. As indicated on Figure 3, the signalized Vance Street and High Court intersections with 38th Avenue currently operate at LOS A during the AM and PM peak hours. All individual turning movements at the unsignalized intersections along 38th Avenue currently operate at LOS D or better, except for the northbound approach at Teller Street, which currently operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour. This condition is typical, however, for unsignalized intersection operations along busy roadways. The relatively heavy through volumes along 38th Avenue within the study area impede left- and right-turn movements from the minor street approaches during the peak hours. The condition is tolerable in this case because the Volume-to-Capacity (V/C) Ratio for the northbound approach at the 38th Avenue/Teller Street intersection is below 1.0. In addition, the reported peak hour 95th percentile queue lengths for the northbound approach are shown to be less than 75 feet. This means that queuing on the northbound approach likely does not regularly impede or block movements from other accesses along Teller Street that are located to the south of 38th Avenue. Appendix B contains the LOS analysis worksheets for the existing traffic conditions. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 6 M Co c\1 2RMER 1 149(87) j t. agol' 1 «53(38) 11 cv co I -501(574)--566(694)N EN , -545(631) 4. I 23J 1 Eli-5(8)r 9(18)4--a/a 1-1---11(2) a/azgdGEI'Ti7 525(77*= V 501(665)- INGN -9 4.-52(26) JT 1 1 r a/a-j @472(571) - 1 282 -7 10(11)-3} ea16(22) -1 I *Ry?r u 2(1)-1 I 35'67nn 0°m 2 E t LEGEND XXX0000 - AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes XXXX = Daily Traffic Volumes X/X =AM/PM Peak Hour Signalized 38th Ave. Intersection Level of Service 38th Ave. X/X =AM/PM Peak Hour Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service = Stop Sign = Traffic Signal Er Vol I -568(615) 488(682)- 25(46)1 NE C) CO W N 1 -liv-r/-7 4(23)J LL' E-3(9) 4/9(695)- 12(22)-1 Ear GES LO O .r- Figure 3 Existing Traffic Conditions / FELSBURG - 4 HOLT &ULLEVIG CD SITE 01'0 0 0 14,700 El#JA Vance St.19 luewdn West End 38 Traffic Impact Study 111. PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT A. Trip Generation Estimates Proposed Land Uses The approximate 2.83-acre site is planned to be redeveloped with 155 market-rate apartments and a 7,707 SF retail building. In addition, the existing Vectra Bank is planned to be relocated into a new, two-story 4,667 SF building on a separate pad site. Parking is planned to be provided in a new, 236-space parking garage, along with a total of 38 surface parking spaces. On-street parking is also planned to be provided along the site's frontage to Upham Street and 38th Avenue. The proposed land uses and parking garage are anticipated to be fully built-out by the fourth quarter of 2018. The Trip Generation Manual, gth Edition (2012), by the Institute of Transportation Engineers UTE), contains trip generation data applicable to the specific land use types that are proposed to be developed. Trip generation data corresponding to the following ITE Land Uses were used to calculate the trip generation estimates for the proposed redevelopment: • Land Use: 220 Apartments • Land Use: 826 Specialty Retail Center • Land Use: 912 Drive-In Bank Table 2 summarizes the vehicle-trip generation rates that were used to develop the vehicle-trip estimates corresponding to the average weekday daily and AM and PM peak hours. Following guidance contained in the Trip Generation Handbook, 3d Edition by ITE, regression equations were used to calculate the trip generation estimates for the land uses and time periods that are noted below: • Land Use: 220 Apartments - Average weekday daily, AM and PM peak hours • Land Use: 826: Specialty Retail Center - PM peak hour For all other land uses and time periods, weighted average rates were used. A trip generation rate for the AM peak hour of adjacent street traffic is not available for Land Use: 826 Specialty Retail Center. An estimate was developed for this time period by factoring the AM peak hour of adjacent street traffic rate for Land Use: 820 Shopping Center by the ratio of the rate for the PM peak hour of adjacent street traffic for these two respective land uses. Table 2 summarizes the vehicle-trip generation rates used to develop the vehicle-trip estimates for the average weekday daily and AM and PM peak hours. .FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 8 West End 38 Trajfic Impact Study Table 2.Trip Generation Rates Trip Generation Rates<1) ITE Land Use Land Use Ind. Variable AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily In Out Total In Out Total Apartments 220 DUs(2)6.86 0.10 0.41 0.51 0.43 0.23 0.66 Specialty Retail Center 826 KSF(31 44.32 0.98 0.60 1.58 2.28 2.90 5.18 Drive-In Bank 912 KSF 148.15 6.89 5.19 12.08 12.15 12.15 24.30 Notes: (1) Source:Trip Generation Manual, gth Edition (2012) by ITE (2) DUs = dwelling units (3) KSF = 1,000 Square Feet Gross Floor/Leasable Area Table 3 summarizes the number of average weekday daily and AM and PM peak hour vehicle- trips the West End 38 redevelopment project is expected to generate. The site is expected to generate approximately 2,100 vehicle-trips on an average weekday, with about 150 trips during the AM peak hour and about 255 trips during the PM peak hour. Table 3.Trip Generation Estimates-Proposed Redevelopment Land Use Quantity Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Trips In Out Total In Out Total Apartments 155 DUs 1,063 16 64 80 67 36 103 Specialty Retail Center 7.707 KSF 342 8 5 13 18 22 40 Drive-In Bank 4.667 KSF 691 32 24 56 57 57 114 Total Trips 2,096 56 93 149 142 115 257 Existing Land Uses The West End 38 project is redeveloping a site that is currently occupied with existing land uses. For this reason, the vehicle-trips generated by the existing land uses must also be considered when assessing the overall net increase in vehicle-trips that can be expected as a result of the redevelopment. The trip generation of the existing land uses was estimated as shown in Table 4. The Wheat Ridge Localworks, Farmers Insurance agency, and All School Apparel uses were assumed to operate similar to Land Use: 710 General Office Building. Land Use: 912 Drive-In Bank was used to estimate the trip generation of the existing bank, and Land Use: 942 Automobile Care Center was used to estimate the trip generation of the auto repair shop. PEI.SBURG H O LT & ULLEVIG Page 9 West End 38 Traffic Impact Study Table 4.Net Increase in Trip Generation Land Use Quantity Daily AM Peak Hour Trips PM Peak Hour Trips Trips In Out Total In Out Total General Office Building 8.750 KSF 97 12 2 14 2 11 13 Drive-In Bank 3.500 KSF 519 24 18 42 43 43 86 Automobile Care Center 3.100 KSF 96 5 2 7 5 5 10 Existing Land Use Vehicle-Trips 712 41 22 63 50 59 109 Proposed Land Use Vehicle Trips 2,096 56 93 149 142 115 257 Net Increase 1,384 15 71 86 92 56 148 As shown in Table 4, the proposed redevelopment is expected to result in a net increase of approximately 1,385 vehicle-trips on an average weekday, with about 85 additional vehicle-trips during the AM peak hour and about 150 additional vehicle-trips during the PM peak hour. The overall net increase in vehicle-trips was used to calculate the difference between long term background and total traffic volumes. B. Site Trip Distribution and Traffic Assignment The site trip distribution is based primarily on the existing peak hour travel patterns in the vicinity of the site and reflects the redevelopment site's proximity to other primary regional travel routes, such as Wadsworth Boulevard and Sheridan Boulevard. City of Wheat Ridge staff reviewed and commented on the trip distribution assumptions prior to submittal of this report. Figure 4 illustrates the site trip distribution percentages, which are described below: • 40 percent to/from the west via 38th Avenue; • 35 percent to/from the east via 38th Avenue; • 15 percent to/from the north via Upham Street; • 5 percent to/from the north via Vance Street; and • 5 percent to/from the south via Teller Street. The site-generated traffic volumes found in Table 3 were assigned to the street network and the proposed site accesses using the above distributions. Figure 5 depicts the site-generated traffic volumes. The majority of left turns exiting the site to travel to the east on 38th Avenue were assigned to the Vance Street intersection because it is signalized. Other turning movements entering and exiting the site are expected to be relatively balanced among the proposed site accesses. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 10 4 Wadsworth Blvd. Vance St. * Upham St. Upham St. Teller St. Un High Ct.High Ct. 01 5 CD bf uoilnquls!0 d!4 ITE 15% linquisla d!11 LEGEND 49 LE< )00(0009 - AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 2 .==J XXXX = Daily Traffic Volumes 5 t_ 17(33) - 18(16) TE -Uptlm-bl © Upi lai 110 l.76 Jelle.L CE I LOLD |„ col t-5(9)2291-22(32) 13(35) -3 8(1 5)-1 T9(22) - |36(61)- 1 W ?5| t__7(26) 5(19) -t T 31(42)- 38th Ave.01 600 0 38th Ave. 900 OP Tre 26 -20(50) 10(5)-3 E 20(11)-3 lcD 33(40) -Ill5(6) -7 CO N 00 1 /05 FELSBURG1101_T &ULLEVIG Figure 5 Site Generated Traffic 38thand UphamSite 16-173 12/7/16 29 West End 38 Traffic Impact Study IV. 2040 BACKGROUND (WITHOUT SITE) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. 2040 Background Traffic Volumes Background traffic is the component of traffic volume on the local street network that is unrelated to the proposed development. For this report, long term background traffic forecasts for the year 2040 have been developed, Consistent with the 38th Avenue Corridor Study Road Diet Traffic Analysis by Muller Engineering Company, a 15 percent growth rate was applied throughout the study area to calculate the projected 2040 background traffic volumes. Figure 6 depicts the 2040 background traffic volumes, intersection geometrics, and traffic control. B. 2040 Background Traffic Operations The same traffic analysis procedures used to analyze the existing traffic conditions were applied to the 2040 background traffic volumes. Figure 6 depicts the intersection LOS results for the 2040 background traffic conditions. The signalized intersections of Vance Street and High Court with 38th Avenue are expected to continue to operate at LOS A based on the 2040 background traffic projections. All movements through the unsignalized intersections are also projected to operate acceptably, with three exceptions: (1) As was the case with existing traffic volumes, the northbound approach at the 38th Avenue/Teller Street intersection is projected to operate at a deficient LOS. Based on the 2040 background traffic projections, the operation of the northbound approach is expected to degrade from LOS E (based on existing traffic conditions) to LOS F during the PM peak hour. (2) The northbound approach at the 38th Avenue/Upham Street (north leg) intersection is projected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. This low-volume approach is an access to business along the south side of 38th Avenue. (3) The southbound approach at the 38th Avenue/Upham Street (north leg) intersection is projected to operate at LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours. Appendix C contains the LOS analysis worksheets for the 2040 background traffic conditions. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 13 gale¤A/A E-@2 1 t_50(90) 1 w 0 1 +-650(660)11 F(10) 9*1312 OLD O -4 1 6050= 50(105) 525(715) 20(25) - .EGEND DO((XXX) = XXXX = X/X = X/X = 0 = 550(770)- 30(55) 4 19 -700(745) t.r 1 0(25) 58502Ei--E<- 9 :8 2 a/b V 05'GB' 1 L60(45) CO 0 00 1 -670(720), | a/a 60(35) JT+1 1 F a/a j T® 545(800) - [776[6 5(5) -1 1 Di'NE NIT AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Daily Traffic Volumes AM/PM Peak Hour Signalized Intersection Level of Service 38th Ave.0 1 SITE 60 0 0 00 VA SE LO in ././.In Upham St..10 46!H Upham St.lS Jelial .JO 48/H 38th Ave. AM/PM Peak Hour Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service Stop Sign Traffic Signal 16,9 121 0 C Co 2 1 t_15(10) - 710(705) 1 CiTE ES 00 00 00 2 i OEL 0 10 CO -650(680) (- . <_XI 1r-€(1 m I Ir- a/a 545(7Qn\ 1 5(10) -1 V 15(25) 7 595(835622 EZE= OLD N "- a/a - Figure 6 2040 Background Traffic Conditions FELSBURG4 HO]-T & ,0 ULLEVIG West End 38 Traffic Impact Study V. 2040 TOTAL (WITH SITE) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS A. 2040 Total Traffic Volumes The estimated net increase in site-generated traffic volumes (from Table 4) was added to the 2040 background traffic volumes (from Figure 6) to determine the projected 2040 total traffic volume projections. The turning movements assigned through the site access driveways correspond to the site-generated traffic volumes from Figure 5; however, the total volume entering or exiting the site was increased corresponding to the estimated overall net increase in trip generation that is expected as a result of the proposed redevelopment. This was done to account for the removal of existing site uses to avoid double-counting vehicle-trips associated with the redeveloped site uses (for example from the relocated bank land use). Figure 7 depicts the 2040 total traffic volume projections. B. 2040 Total Traffic Operations The same traffic analysis procedures used to analyze the existing and 2040 background traffic volumes were applied to the 2040 total traffic volumes. For the total traffic analysis, however, the proposed site accesses onto 38th Avenue and Upham Street were also analyzed. Specifically, these include the access that is planned to align opposite the south leg of Upham Street and the proposed parking garage access onto Upham Street north of 38th Avenue. Figure 7 depicts the 2040 total traffic LOS results, and Appendix D contains the LOS analysis worksheets. The signalized intersections of Vance Street and High Court with 38th Avenue are expected to continue to operate at LOS B or better based on the 2040 total traffic projections. All movements through the unsignalized intersections are projected to operate acceptably, with the exception of the same three movements noted in the 2040 background traffic operations section plus two additional movements. With the addition of the net increase in site-generated traffic volumes, the northbound approach at the 38th Avenue/Upham Street (south leg) intersection is projected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. In addition, the northbound approach at the 38th Avenue/Upham Street (north leg) intersection is projected to operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour. As mentioned, the southbound approach at the 38th Avenue/Upham Street (north leg) intersection is expected to operate at LOS E during the AM and PM peak hours based on the 2040 background traffic projections. A single-lane southbound approach is expected to continue to operate at LOS E during the AM peak hour based on the 2040 total traffic projections, but the approach level of service is shown to degrade to LOS F during the PM peak hour. However, the V/C Ratio would remain below 1.0 with a manageable queue length of only 75 feet. An option to widen the southbound approach of Upham Street to 38th Avenue to include a shared left turn/through lane and a separate right turn lane was also analyzed. With a two-lane approach, the southbound right turn movement is projected to operate at LOS C or better during the peak hours. The southbound through/left turn movement, however, is projected to operate at LOS F during both peak hours, but the V/C Ratio is shown to remain below 1.0 with a queue length of less than 50 feet (about 25 feet shorter than that associated with a single-lane approach). As part of the redevelopment plan, the curb returns along Upham Street approaching 38th Avenue are planned to be narrowed to provide for on-street parking along the site's frontage and a shorter pedestrian crossing distance (given a narrower Upham Street) which would otherwise preclude widening the southbound approach. Results of both scenarios are shown here to allow the City to weigh pros and cons of each. €..FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 15 - A/B 62 One-Lane SB Approach (existing geometry)1.1 - N .'RER I «50(95) S I 915(35)11 *6* 170(65) 73 1.0 0 0) 1 4-665(675)1 12.·2 9 1 -700(735)'.Lanb LO Ne 1 -670(740) 4. 1 1J 1 Llr-5(10)JAF-10(25)JJLF--15(5) 4-a/a 50(135)_! I llc --'10(15)_tr 7 [+ __* 575(820) - 1 26[R X19a/a-/ T®70(50)»T +1 1 F a/a -2 T ®545(740)-,000 -r 625(860)- 1 62 -h V 1 --i..-....-20(25) n I azz.-15(15)-1 I En I tO OLD 1 k0 1.0 0 2269 C,C\' r 0 -9-h=R m | 3 a/a - ---mal-- 4-;k OLEGEND .g C 1 05 90)a/a479. --xxx(xxx) = AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes R XXXX = Daily Traffic Volumes X/X =AM/PM Peak Hour Signalized 38th Ave.Intersection Level of Service SITE 010 0 0 17,675 121 CD 0 C 6 0E k 79 Ulewdn lS Jellel Two-Lane SB Approach 38th Ave. X/X =AM/PM Peak Hour Unsignalized Intersection Level of Service O = Stop Sign = Traffic Signal - 715(735) 62 te 00 Er- 09 LID N .--*ES 3 '7 [° 32%1(710) 2/1Ur) CD c- a/a 10(5 570mnm -Ontln 15(25) 7 575(790)-re35(60)-1 7/ 097 1 a/a -€ E 9 23.U,4 -7.86ULD U SEO LO 00N "-9- CO Figure 7 2040 Total Traffic Conditions ULLEVIG West End 38 Trajfic Impact Study VI.RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS The following improvements are recommended as a result of the proposed West End 38 redevelopment project. 38th Avenue/Vance Street (Int. #1): No improvements are recommended at this signalized intersection. The intersection is projected to operate at LOS B or better through the year 2040 with the anticipated net increase in traffic resulting from the proposed redevelopment. In lieu of the number of broadside crashes experienced at the intersection, the City may want to evaluate changing the clearance interval or increasing the visibility of the traffic signal heads, such as through the application of retroreflective tape to outline the traffic signal head backplates. Even though none of the reported crashes involved an eastbound left turning vehicle, the potential need for an eastbound left turn phase could also be evaluated based on the number of left turning vehicles and the opposing westbound through traffic volume. 38th Avenue/Upham Street (south leg) (Int. #2): Based on the 2040 total traffic projections, the northbound approach is projected to operate at LOS E during the PM peak hour. This condition is typical along busy roadways with STOP-controlled minor street approaches. In this case, the V/C Ratio is shown to remain well below 1.0, and the projected 95th percentile queue length is calculated to be approximately 25 feet. These measures indicate that the approach is not over capacity and vehicle queues are minimal. In addition, motorists have the option to use the Vance Street traffic signal to complete northbound left turns which experience the most delay. 38th Avenue/Upham Street (north leg) (Int. #3): By the year 2040, the southbound approach at this intersection is projected to operate at a deficient level of service during both the AM and PM peak hours regardless of whether the proposed redevelopment occurs. The southbound approach was analyzed considering both single-lane and two- lane configurations. The two-lane approach improves operations for the southbound right turn movement and slightly decreases queue lengths, but it would preclude the developer's plan to provide on-street parking along the west side of Upham Street and increase the pedestrian crossing distance. The City should weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each approach configuration. 38th Avenue/Teller Street (Int. #4): The northbound approach currently operates at LOS E during the PM peak hour and is projected to degrade to LOS F by 2040 regardless of the proposed redevelopment project. The site would increase volumes on the northbound approach by approximately four percent during the AM peak hour and six percent during the PM peak hour. The V/C Ratio is shown to remain below 1.0 and the projected 95th percentile queue length is expected to be about 150 feet in length, which would impact two driveways south of 38th Avenue. Motorists northbound on Teller Street approaching this intersection have the option to use the traffic signal at High Court to complete movements. 38th Avenue/High Court (Int. #5): The 38th Avenue/High Court signalized intersection is projected to operate at LOS A through the year 2040. No changes are recommended to this signalized intersection. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 17 H/est End 38 Traffic Impact Study 38th Avenue/Upham Street Parking Garage Access (Int. #6): Movements at this intersection are projected to operate at LOS A during the peak hours. Auxiliary lanes are not recommended based on the projected turning movement volumes. VII.SUMMARY A. Project Description The West End 38 project is proposing to redevelop a 2.83-acre site that is located to the north of 38th Avenue between Vance Street and Upham Street in the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado. The land uses that are currently operating on the site include Vectra Bank (3,500 SF), Wheat Ridge Localworks (1,375 SF), a Farmers Insurance agency (1,250 SF), and All Schools Apparel (6,125 SF). All Schools Apparel is a school uniform supply store with minimal staff and limited hours of operation. These four land uses are contained within a two-story, 12,250 SF building. A 3,100 SF building that was formerly occupied by D&A Auto Services, Inc. is located near the northeast corner of the site. The site is planned to be redeveloped with 155 market-rate apartment dwelling units and a 7,707 SF retail building. In addition, the existing Vectra Bank is planned to be relocated into a new, two-story 4,667 SF building on a separate pad site. Parking is planned to be provided in a new, 236-space parking garage, along with a total of 38 surface parking spaces. On-street parking is planned to be provided along the site's frontage to Upham Street and 38th Avenue. The proposed land uses and parking garage are anticipated to be fully built-out by the fourth quarter of 2018. B. Trip Generation The West End 38 redevelopment project is anticipated to generate a total of approximately 150 total vehicle-trips during the AM peak hour and approximately 255 total vehicle-trips during the PM peak hour. The estimated weekday daily average trip generation potential is approximately 2,100 vehicle-trips per day. Considering the existing land uses on site, the redevelopment is expected to result in a net increase of approximately 1,385 vehicle-trips on an average weekday, with about 85 additional vehicle-trips during the AM peak hour and about 150 additional vehicle-trips during the PM peak hour. C. Traffic Operations The signalized intersections of Vance Street and High Court with 38th Avenue are projected to operate acceptably, at LOS B or better, through the year 2040. There are movements on the minor-street approaches at the unsignalized intersections of Upham Street (south and north legs) and Teller Street that are projected to operate at LOS E or LOS F. This condition is expected to occur at Upham Street (north leg) and Teller Street intersections with 38th Avenue based on the background traffic conditions, regardless of whether or not the proposed redevelopment project occurs. At the 38th Avenue/Upham Street (south leg) intersection, the northbound approach is shown to degrade from LOS D to LOS E with the addition of the site-generated traffic volumes. However, the V/C Ratios are shown to remain below 1.0 and the projected 95th percentile queue lengths are manageable at less than 50 feet. Motorists have the option to use the Vance Street traffic signal to complete northbound left turns. FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Page 18 West End 38 Traffic Impact Study APPENDIX A TRAFFIC COUNT DATA €..FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Appendix A Al@'590/ARRIP£ (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 1 VANCE ST & 38TH AVE AM Date and Start Time: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 Peak Hour:07:45 AM - 08:45 AM Peak 15-Minutes:07:45 AM - 08:00 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (178)106 0.85 100 (182) VANCE ST I-1 5-| C.1 38THAVE -lij N N NO I 1 -6 L------- (1,037)JILb (1,038) - 1 .3 L 49 N N558 *==A- 555 49 J N - 501 Ul W.k,bE -0.87 W 0.97 E 0.90 472 ..4 s r 5 -4 541 w O538 .4 S (1,042)16 7 CO (1,047) 1- 716-6 0-:PO -·ru N dTH AVE VANCE ST '1 1 (33) 23 0.89 23 (41) Note Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 38TH AVE 38TH AVE VANCE ST VANCE ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 13 91 0 0 0 115 8 0 1 1 3 0 5 0 4 241 1,116 0000 7:15 AM 0 13 124 1 0 0 108 12 0 2 0 1 0 16 0 9 286 1,174 0002 7:30 AM 0 7 131 2 0 1 105 8 0211 0 13 0 3 274 1,202 2010 8:00 AM 0 13 101 4 0 3 128 14 0 2 0 3 0 21 0 10 299 1,183 1 0 4 0 8:15 AM 1 16 134 6 0 1 122 8 0322 0 13 1 5 314 100 2. 8:30 AM ·» 0 12 117 4 0 0 111 13 0 5 0 2 0 16 0 14 294 16 1121 8:45 AM 0 11 107 4 0 1 117 8 0 3 0 3 0 11 1 10 276 2011 Count Total 1 93 925 23 0 7 946 85 0 22 4 15 0 107 3 68 2,299 7189 Peak Hour 1 49 472 16 0 5 501 49 0 14 2 7 0 62 2 42 1,222 316 A-1 (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 1 VANCE ST & W. 38TH AVE PM Date and Start Time: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 Peak Hour:04:30 PM - 05:30 PM Peak 15-Minutes:05:15 PM - 05:30 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (394)213 0.79 192 (325) 1 1 VANCE ST -1-3 3-41 00 luW 38THAVE 1 00 01 CP 0 L--' 6 1- (1,360)3/Lb (1,336) N0 0 L 87 676 *-I- 669 - 0.91 103 J w 017 E I- 574 0.94 - W.Rat)E 571 ..0 s r8 -4 696696 .4 S (1,252)14 1 tr (1,284) 1 10 21=|*-1 4=4| VANCE ST '1 1 (61) 35 0.75 21 (48) Note Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts W. 38TH AVE W. 38TH AVE VANCE ST VANCE ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Totai Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 15 105 3 0 3 133 16 0 3 1 0 0 23 0 17 319 1,507 0 2 0 3 4:15 PM 0 19 136 4 0 2 148 22 0 4 0 5 0 26 3 28 397 1,583 0001 4:30 PM ¥ 0 27 145 1 0 0 158 24 0 4 0 1 0 21 2 21 404 1,599 0001 4:45 PM 0 25 145 6 0 6 140 17 0 1 1 1 0 27 0 18 387 1,555 002 f; P 5:00 PM 0 20 128 7 0 1 139 28 0 3 1 0 0 37 1 30 395 1,523 1 0 1 1 ///pl///B///// / / / 1* ///////B*R $ 5:30 PM 0 17 112 4 0 1 162 21 0 4 1 1 0 19 1 17 360 0100 5:45 PM 0 9 130 2 0 2 145 12 0 8 0 0 0 31 1 15 355 0310 Count Total 0 163 1,054 35 0 16 1,162 158 0 33 4 11 0 219 10 165 3,030 1749 Peak Hour 0 103 571 22 0 8 574 87 0 14 2 5 0 120 5 88 1,599 1135 A-2 ---fervices Ila..,.. (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 2 UPHAM ST (SOUTH LEG) & 38TH AVE AM Date and Start Time: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 Peak Hour:07:45 AM - 08:45 AM Peak 15-Minutes:07:45 AM - 08:00 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0 0.00 0 UPHAM ST (SOUTH LEG)Il tl |*-4 2=*| Eastbound St 1 0 0 0 0 1-1 1J 1 6 L--- (1,064)JILb (1,068) t - 10 -3 Lo ¤N 574 -- *•-575 OJ w W E -566 o W·**E I0.91 0.81 535 -4 525 - S r9 .4 546 ° (1,054)10 -1 ¢0 (1,071)i- 71S 91/r --7 -3 n 0 00 0 [UFFEE 43 021 UPHAM ST (SOUTH LEG) (37) 19 0.73 29 (51) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts Eastbound St,38TH AVE UPHAM ST (SOUTH LEG)UPHAM ST (SOUTH LEG) Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Stan Time U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right Totai Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 0 108 1 0 0 121 1 0 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 237 1,112 0 0 0 0 7:15 AM 0 0 148 3 0 1 129 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 283 1,138 0 0 1 1 7:30 AM 0 0 137 2 0 3 120 0 0 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 270 1,137 000 1 8:00 AM 0 0 121 1 0 2 134 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 263 1,061 001 0 8:15 AM 0 0 137 5 0 1 129 0 0 4 0 6 0 0 0 0 282 0 0 1 8:30 AM $\ 0 ., 0 130 2 0 2 130 0 0 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 272 0 0 1 2 8:45 AM 0 0 117 3 0 5 113 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 244 1023 Count Total 0 0 1,035 19 0 18 1,049 1 0 15 0 36 0 0 0 0 2,173 1 0 6 11 Peak Hour 0 0 525 10 0 9 566 0 0 8 0 21 0 0 0 0 1,139 003 A-3 glf@*.*2'ili es IES......,,1 (303) 216-2439 www.alitafficdata.net Location: 1 UPHAM ST (SOUTH LEG) & 38TH AVE PM Date and Start Time: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 Peak Hour:04:30 PM - 05:30 PM Peak 15-Minutes:05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk 0 0.00 0 0 DRIVEWAYIt tl |*=3 6-*| 38TH AVE lij 0000 L_ 1 L-9 L--- (1,366)JlLb (1.378) 1 - -t0 0 Lo N 709 4-A= 712O -' w otS E 0- 694 o w.k (*tf o0.89 0.92 774.,s r 18 -4 786 -785 =* S (1,412)111 90 (1,407) - 97 tr -1 02: N I 38THAVE 'It (59) 29 0.75 27 (42) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 38TH AVE 38TH AVE UPHAM ST (SOUTH LEG)DRIVEWAY Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Time U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 0 172 4 0 6 159 0 0003 0 0 0 0 344 1,386 0 1 1 3 4:15 PM 0 0 146 3 0 4 163 0 0202 0000 320 1,4440103 4:30 PM 0 0 177 2 0 6 163 0 0401 0000 353 1,5240013 4:45 PM 0 0 184 3 0 6 169 0 0205 00003691,5050033UE 00 Prt -7-0 17'111 11 Ill I '-14 11 7-1---am'E'll 5:15 PM 0 0 195 3 0 3 190 0 0405 0000 400 0010 5:30 PM 0 0 161 4 0 5 159 0 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 0 334 0005 5:45 PM 0 0 133 4 0 0 170 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 310 0001 Count Total 0 0 1,386 26 0 33 1,345 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 0 2,832 02619 Peak Hour 0 0 774 11 0 18 694 0 0 15 0 12 0 0 0 0 1,524 0057 A-4 A.*14@,C ervices Ix*.=,. (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 3 UPHAM ST (NORTH LEG) & 38TH AVE AM Date and Start Time: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 Peak Hour:07:45 AM - 08:45 AM Peak 15-Minutes:07:45 AM - 08:00 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (108)54 0.68 105 (158) UPHAM ST (NORTH LEG)Il tl |*-3 2-4| N 1\J 38TH AVE --1 000.0 11 11-5 l,-- (1,060)3/Lb (1,080)00 L 53 0576 4-4-= 609 W52 J N -545 0.95 W 0.91 E 0.86 0 W.R*14 M 501 -0 s r 11 -,I 528555 ==0 0 . (1,066)2-1 CO (1,027) -. S 41/r --7 18 O w O - 1227 i i|*-6 12=4| UPHAM ST (NORTH LEGI It (17) 13 0.63 4 (8) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 38TH AVE 38TH AVE UPHAM ST (NORTH LEG)UPHAM ST (NORTH LEG) Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Time U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 5 98 0 0 1 107 0 0000 0407 222 1,109 0001 7:15 AM 0 7 136 0 0 1 117 4 0011 0306 276 1,199 0000 7:30 AM 0 11 136 0 0 2 103 7 0101 04010 275 1,221 0001 , 1.4 .12* Iu-4311 -Il ,2-1-IL'-' 4 //////// /////5#Tr,2-2 -·UT-J -7,-.-1-Ii-= 8:00 AM 0 10 116 0 0 4 138 21 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 11 312 1.153 0 11 11 0 8:15 AM 0 14 128 1 0 2 129 13 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 4 298 0111 8:30 AM *0 15 129 1 0 2 114 8 0101 0 2 0 3 276 0223 8:45 AM 0 9 109 0 0 0 120 9 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 13 267 0131 Count Total 0 84 980 2 0 15 992 73 0 4 1 3 0 44 0 64 2,262 0 18 19 7 Peak Hour 0 52 501 2 0 11 545 53 0 301 0 26 0 28 1,222 0 17 16 4 A-5 (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 2 DRIVEWAY & W. 38TH AVE PM Date and Start Time: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 Peak Hour:04:30 PM - 05:30 PM Peak 15-Minutes:05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (96) 53 0.75 64 (108) UPHAM STIt tl *-3 7-4| 1 W-1W 38TH AVE |.0.0 1 1 10 (1,346)JILb (1,343) No b L 38 i 0 CD672 /-4- 671N26 J -631 o W*(*bE r.0.93 W 0.97 E 0.89 665 -4 S r 2 -0 681692 ---, 47/r (1,286)6 --(1,301)17 S ------ ° 0 fF-Im-:4 --7 -1 1|*-1 5-4| DRIVEWAY 11 1 (8) 3 0.50 4 (8) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts W. 38TH AVE W. 38TH AVE DRIVEWAY UPHAM ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 3 129 0 0 1 148 7 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 7 302 1.332 0311 4:15 PM 0 8 144 0 0 2 168 4 0001 0 3 0 7 337 1,397 0 3 1 4 4:30 PM 0 7 164 0 0 0 168 9 0101 0 1 0 10 361 1,420 0 2 2 3 ;{2_-1,,--J ., 301.W i.-:·4 -·- 11-I ---160- 3 1 L- 3 24_ _ #MI# 1 ....1 ...1.4 - lili 1-%1:44. 5:15 PM 0 8 164 0 0 2 158 11 0001 0 6 0 10 360 0001 5:30 PM 0 5 146 0 0 0 184 9 0001 0 2 0 7 354 0001 5:45 PM 0 6 167 1 0 1 146 2 0001 0 5 0 6 335 0010 Count Total 0 48 1,251 2 0 6 1,277 60 0305 0 30 0 66 2,748 08812 Peak Hour 0 26 665 1 0 2 631 38 0 202 0 14 0 39 1,420 0256 A-6 rvices kE.=- (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 1 TELLER ST & 38TH AVE AM Date and Start Time: Thursday, November 10, 2016 Peak Hour:07:45 AM - 08:45 AM Peak 15-Minutes:08:30 AM - 08:45 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles ' Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk It 1 4 -1 38TH AVE ---1 1 1 (1,127)J/Lb (1.088) t- -10 -3 Lo N 643 4-A- 628o J W 07 E •-6140.99 0.93 o W**tf 0 488 .4 s r 14 -4 511513 ..0 (1,007)25 -1 co (1,005) - =S 41 tr --7 -1-10-Ill 0-[I TELLERST 11 1 (65) 39 0.69 52 (102) Note Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 38TH AVE 38TH AVE TELLER ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Nonhbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Tjme U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Totai Hour West East South North 7:00 AM 0 0 111 3 0 0 109 0 0 12 0 4 7:15 AM 0 0 124 6 0 1 88 0 0 5 0 2 7.30 AM 0 0 126 4 0 6 139 0 0 12 0 10 7:45 AM ¥ 0 0 124 6 0 4 157 0 0 9 0 5 8:00 AM 0 0 120 5 0 5 164 0 0 506 8:15 AM 0 0 118 4 0 1 138 0 0 6 0 8 a il. 'Jiti kbi· .: 4 *:out,K 8:45 AM 0 0 116 4 0 2 115 0 0401 Count Total 0 0 965 42 0 23 1,065 0 0 62 0 40 Peak Hour 0 0 488 25 0 14 614 0 0 29 0 23 239 1,067 0 0 0 226 1333 000 297 1,182 000 305 1,193 0 0 0 305 1130 0 0 0 275 000 242 000 2,197 0 0 1 1,193 0 0 1 A-7 ices ki.. (303) 216-2439 www.alitafficdata.net Location: 1 TELLER ST & 38TH AVE PM Date and Start Time: Thursday, November 10, 2016 Peak Hour:04:45 PM - 05:45 PM Peak 15-Minutes:05:00 PM - 05: 15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk 1 1 1--1 1 138TH AVE 2 It (1,364)J/Lb (1,294) N0 -S Lo 10 0699 4-4- 6650 J N -642 0.93 W 0.93 E 0.88 0 W.*(*e - 682 -0 s r 23 -* 728728 ..0 S46-1 90 (1,347)(1,359)41/r --7 -70 5 0&r=Ir --1 1|*-4 1-4| TELLERST 'It (118) 69 0.83 103 (176) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 38TH AVE 38TH AVE TELLER ST Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Total Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 0 125 9 0 2 160 0 0 10 0 4 4:15 PM 0 0 155 9 0 3 159 0 0 18 0 10 4:30 PM 0 0 158 7 0 0 162 0 0 8 0 5 4:45 PM 0 0 179 12 5:15 PM 0 0 182 16 5:30 PM 1 0 0 144. 9 310 354 340 0 5 151 0 0 18 0 13 378 1 rb©44***:w 2 r w 0 5 142 0 0 15 0 9 369 10 3 169 0 0 9 0 12 £ dw 346 A Peak Hour 0 0 682 46 0 23 642 0 0 57 0 46 1,496 1,382 0 0 0 1,475 0 0 2 1,490 0 0 2 ;496 00 0 - 003 0 0 003 0 1 12 0 1 5 5:45 PM 0 0 153 15 0 4 139 0 0909 329 Count Total 0 0 1,273 86 0 32 1.262 0 0 102 0 74 2.829 A-8 (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 2 HIGH CT & 38TH AVE AM Date and Start Time: Thursday, November 10, 2016 Peak Hour:07:45 AM - 08:45 AM Peak 15-Minutes:08:00 AM - 08: 15 AM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (89) 78 0.48 28 08) HIGHCTIt tl |-9 2-| re 38THAVE Illj (C, --CO C>L- -;'11 - (1,083)J 1 L b (1,022)0 0 /-11 1 -N el Ul632 *- *-58217 J N *=568 0.95 W 0.91 E CO.90 - W.*(Ae .1 479 -4 s r 3 -0 517 6, 0508 .4 12 7 CO (1,003)1 S (999)41/r --7 /---1 0 4 0 i 1-1 0-10 - 1 ©HAVE | I HIGH CT 'l i (27) 16 0.70 25 (51) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 38TH AVE 38TH AVE HIGH CT HIGH CT Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Star't Time U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Tum Left Thru Right Totai Hour West East South North 0=j 7.00 AM 0 1 112 0 0 0 105 2 0 4 0 2 0 0 0 2 228 1,012 0 1 2 2 7:15 AM 0 4 119 3 0 0 87 2 0 1 0 4 0 0 0 2 222 1,110 000 1 7+30 AM 0 3 130 2 0 3 125 3 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 275 1,163 000 0 7:45 AM 0 4 120 1 0 1 140 2 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 11 287 1,193 0 2 0 2 8:001 8:15 AM 0 3 121 3 0 0 127 2 0 2 0 2 0 7 0 8 275 2 1 0 1,8:30 AM 0 2 123 5 0 0 158 3 0 5 0 1 0 3 0 5 305 4*% 0 0 0 2 8:45 AM 0 4 113 0 0 2 110 1 0 5 0 3 0 3 1 1 243 0001 Count Total 0 29 953 17 0 8 995 19 0 32 0 19 0 31 2 56 2,161 8 6 2 14 Peak Hour 0 17 479 12 0 3 568 11 0 15 0 10 0 28 1 49 1,193 8 5 0 10 A-9 (303) 216-2439 www.alltrafficdata.net Location: 2 HIGH CT & 38TH AVE PM Date and Start Time: Thursday, November 10, 2016 Peak Hour:04:30 PM - 05:30 PM Peak 15-Minutes:05:00 PM - 05:15 PM Peak Hour - All Vehicles Peak Hour - Pedestrians/Bicycles on Crosswalk (50) 28 0.70 24 (64) HIGH CTIt tl |0-3 1-*| N38THAVE---C)O L- )'4 ''1- (1,294)JILb (1,249) N0 .5 07 1 661 *-A- 63115 J N -615 0.96 W 0.92 E 0.88 ,¤ W.k*f N695 -0 s rg .4 712732 -4 3 22 7 CO (1,283) 1 - S(1,334)4,ir --1 - 7 . -7 ON w z: EFFIE I iA-0 3 -4| HIGH CT 'l t (62) 32 0.92 38 (70) Note: Total study counts contained in parentheses. Traffic Counts 38TH AVE 38TH AVE HIGH CT HIGH CT Interval Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Rolling Pedestrain Crossings Start Time U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right U-Turn Left Thru Right Tomi Hour West East South North 4:00 PM 0 3 122 5 0 2 158 1 0300 0001 295 1,320 0121 4:15 PM 0 2 157 4 0 1 152 3 0602 0 5 0 3 335 1,412 0 0 0 2 4:30 PM 0 2 155 6 0 1 149 3 0820 0 4 1 5 336 1,429 3 0 2 1 4:45 PM 0 3 182 6 0 0 149 2 0203 0007 354 11423 0100 1.Fmpul,1.1.M,877"14€'™ErrrE.-.4 5:15 PM 0 5 176 7 0 *h.,<5 138 1 0 7 0 5,4 26 0 56 352 1 1 4*.1 2 5:30 PM 0 6 139 5 0 2 157 5 0 8 1 1 0 3 0 3 330 2000 /41 5:45 PM 0 13 139 7 0 4 128 5 0 8 1 2 0 1 0 6 314 1230 Count Total 0 39 1,252 43 0 18 1,210 21 0 50 4 16 0 15 1 34 2,703 11 5 8 6 Peak Hour 0 15 695 22 0 9 615 7 0 25 2 11 0 6 1 21 1,429 8233 A-10 All Traffic Data Services, Inc www.alltrafficdata.net Page 1 Site Code: 4 Station ID: 4 38TH AVE E/0 VANCE ST Start 09-Nov-16 Time Wed EB WB Total 12:00 AM 28 30 58 01:00 13 16 29 02:00 11 14 25 03:00 12 14 26 04:00 31 35 66 05:00 75 102 177 06:00 268 265 533 07:00 487 492 979 08:00 440 466 906 09:00 420 388 808 10:00 438 500 938 11:00 529 ,<i 549 1078 12:00 PM 482 523 1005 01:00 478 543 1021 02:00 524 553 1077 03:00 478 587 1065 04:00 570 544 1114 05:00 540 581 2. 1121 06:00 447 469 916 07:00 274 272 546 08:00 213 277 490 09:00 130 173 303 10:00 115 158 273 11:00 61 66 127 Total 7064 7617 14681 Percent 48.1%51.9% AM Peak - 11:00 11:00 - - - - 11:00 VoL - 529 549 - - - - 1078 PM Peak - 16:00 15:00 - - - - 17:00 VoL - 570 587 - - - 1121 Grand Total 7064 7617 14681 Percent 48.1%51.9% ADT ADT 14,681 AADT 14,681 A-11 West End 38 Traffic Impact Study APPENDIX B EXISTING TRAFFIC LOS WORKSHEETS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Appendix B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Vance St & 38th Ave Existing Traffic AM Peak Hour Movement? EBL¥ EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR¥ NBL- NBT NBR ¥SBL I" SBT¥ SBR Lane Configurations 1 +t•vi ti• 4, 4 f Traffic Volume (veh/h) 49 472 16 5 501 49 14 2 7 62 2 42 Future Volume (veh/h) 49 472 16 5 501 49 14 2 7 62 2 42 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1809 1900 1900 1817 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1864 1810 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 51 487 16 5 516 51 14 2 7 64 2 43 Adj No. oflanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 Cap, veh/h 710 2325 76 762 2537 250 116 24 36 218 6 153 Arrive On Green 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 840 2908 95 909 3174 313 581 241 360 1466 57 1515 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 51 203 300 5 280 287 23 0 0 66 0 43 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 840 1212 1792 909 1726 1761 1182 0 0 1523 0 1515 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.6 4.0 4.0 0.1 3.9 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_ch s 5.5 4.0 4.0 4.2 3.9 3.9 3.5 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 2.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.18 0.61 0.30 0.97 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 710 969 1432 762 1380 1407 177 0 0 224 0 153 V/C Ratio(X)0.07 0.21 0.21 0.01 0.20 0.20 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 710 969 1432 762 1380 1407 396 0 0 433 0 379 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.1 2.4 2.4 2.9 2.4 2.4 41.0 0.0 0.0 42.0 0.0 41.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.0 0,3 0,3 0,1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOf(*95%),veh/In 0.7 2.6 3.7 0.1 3.4 3.5 1.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 0.0 2.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.3 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.7 2.7 41.1 0.0 0.0 42.3 0.0 42.0 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAD D D Approach Vol, veh/h 554 572 23 109 Approach Delay, siveh 2.9 2.7 41.1 42.2 Approach LOS A A D D 1 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 84.9 15.1 84.9 15.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 25.0 65.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_(+11), s 7.5 5.5 6.2 5.5 Green Ext Time (p_ch s 4.8 0.3 4.8 0.3 Intersection Summary ,/./- IMI'llill"/Pr.-a; '1 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.9 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 B-1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Vance St & 38th Ave Existing Traffic PM Peak Hour Mov4*enf-'--'-'"'IN EBL'M-"EBI --EBR re'JWBL"WBT - WBR-NBIJ'"NBY- NBf"BBL/*BT-" Lane Configurations 1 +T,9 +T• 44 4 f Traffic Volume (veh/h)103 571 22 8 574 87 14 2 5 120 5 88 Future Volume (veh/h)103 571 22 8 574 87 14 2 5 120 5 88 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1864 1900 1900 1868 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vet#h 106 589 23 8 592 90 14 2 5 124 5 91 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Cap, veh/h 618 2278 89 653 2364 359 101 20 19 249 7 211 Arrive On Green 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, vehlh 770 2976 116 822 3089 468 304 146 141 1324 53 1566 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 106 247 365 8 339 343 21 0 0 129 0 91 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 770 1249 1843 822 1774 1783 590 0 0 1378 0 1566 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.6 5.8 5.8 0.3 5.6 5.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_-4 s 10.2 5.8 5.8 6.1 5.6 5.6 9.3 0.0 0.0 9.1 0.0 5.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.26 0.67 0.24 0.96 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 618 956 1411 653 1358 1364 139 0 0 256 0 211 V/C Ratio(X)0.17 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.25 0.25 0.15 0.00 0.00 0,50 0.00 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 618 956 1411 653 1358 1364 303 0 0 422 0 391 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1,00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.9 3.4 3.4 4.3 3.4 3.4 38.3 0.0 0.0 41.4 0.0 39.8 Incr Delay 02), siveh 0.6 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.5 Initial Q Delay@As/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/In 1.9 3.9 5.6 0.1 5.1 5.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 0.0 4.2 LnGrp Delay(d),siveh 5.5 4.1 3.9 4.4 3.8 3.8 38.5 0.0 0.0 42.0 0.0 40.3 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAD D D Approach Vol, veh/h 718 690 21 220 Approach Delay s/veh 4.2 3.9 38.5 41.3 Approach LOS A A D DTimer Fllvf YIF' ....7--F2 1.,3 10' 4,'f 5'' 6 r.M'7 --.8 1 . . Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 81.5 18.5 81.5 18.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 25.0 65.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 12.2 11.1 8.1 11.3 Green Ext Time (p_ch s 6.6 0.6 6.6 0.6 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 9.4 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 B-2 Ewo-Wg*Stop-Control Rkport General Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes DCJ Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12/8/2016 2016 AM Peak Hour-Existing East-West West End 38 Site Information Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 38th Ave/Upham St (south) City of Wheat Ridge 38th Avenue Upham Street (south) 0.88 0.25 1 4 1.1. + b L i '11 1 -4.*Yt Pr J:4 lit k CU 71+Ytrf Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00110120 000 000 Configuration T R L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)525 10 9 566 8 21 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 11 0 5 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade 06) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 10 33 Capacity, c (veh/h)908 398 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.08 95% Queue Length, Qs5 (veh)0.0 0.3 Control Delay (s/veh)9.0 14.9 Level of Service, LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 14.9 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/20110·39:48 AM 38th-Upham(south)_Ex_AM.xtw Ak'*2*34:. 1-I(IS 2010 TWi-'A/-·. C.0.04_---+.-I °eport 1. General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (south) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Upham Street (south) Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 J At k L T¥;417 14£442 1. u Jlt 1 1 .W"/6 -0!Ful 11+Vt P r Major Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00110120 000 000 Configuration T R L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)774 11 18 694 15 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No NO No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 19 29 Capacity, c (veh/h)745 222 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.13 95% Queue Length, (15 (veh)0.1 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)10.0 23.6 Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 23.6 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/2016 10·40:13 AM 38th-Upham(south)_Ex_PM.xtw B-4 *a General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (north) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Upham Street (north) Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.91 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 J At + L Ik 5 -*lf,2 r'-ri -C yt 7 i l'Y t 2 r Malo, Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01100110 010 010 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h) 52 501 2 11 545 53 3 0 1 26 0 28 Percent Heavy Vehicles (96) 2 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (96) O 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 57 12 4 60 Capacity, c (veh/h)930 1027 145 207 v/c Ratio 0.06 0.01 0.03 0.29 95% Queue Length, Qg (veh)0.2 0.0 0.1 1.2 Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 8.5 30.5 29.4 Level of Service, LOS A A D D Approach Delay (s/veh)0.9 0.2 30.5 29.4 Approach LOS D D Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010" TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_Ex_AM.xtw Generated: 12/8/20110· 8:53 AM ·; t 1[e]. General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (north) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Upham Street (north) Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.97 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J4JA+1·L 7 i +Vt _P r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01100110 010 010 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h) 26 665 1 2 631 38 2 0 2 14 0 39 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 4 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 27 2 4 54 Capacity, c (veh/h)894 917 164 256 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.00 0.02 0.21 95% Queue Length, (15 (veh)0.1 0.0 0.1 0.8 Control Delay (s/veh)9.2 8.9 27.5 22.8 Level of Service, LOS A A D C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 0.0 27.5 22.8 Approach LOS D C Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_Ex_PM.xtw Generated: 12/8/20110·39:20 AM-6 ..151 Re General Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes DCJ Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12/8/2016 2016 AM Peak Hour-Existing East-West West End 38 Site Information Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 38th Ave/Teller St City of Wheat Ridge 38th Avenue Teller Street 0.97 0.25 1 4 1 1 + b L 4.61. Oil'Ytt·r Major Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00100110 000 000 Configuration TR L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)488 25 14 614 29 23 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 4 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (96) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 14 54 Capacity, c (veh/h)1049 290 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.19 95% Queue Length, Q„ (veh)0.0 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh)85 20.2 Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 20.2 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/201*137:55 AM38th-Teller_Ex_AM.xtw Stop-Coritrol Repori General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Teller St Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2016 North/South Street Teller Street Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Existing Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 1 -1.+1 L J 1;1 + FUUT rl 1 Tr 0 ltv t ,=bf Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00100110 000 000 Configuration TR L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)682 46 23 642 57 46 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (86) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No NO Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 24 108 Capacity, c (veh/h)857 197 v/c Ratio 0.03 0.55 95% Queue Length, (295 (veh)0.1 2.9 Control Delay (s/veh)9.3 43.4 Level of Service, LOS A E Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 43.4 Approach LOS E Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/201#0·38:26 AM38th-Teller_Ex_PM.xtw -8 118''·91%,RIP'l 97'33)EEP'Ew-87 31. 7ca82 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: High Ct & 38th Ave Existing Traffic AM Peak Hour Movement-""I""W""'"" EBLT EBT EBR 'IniA/BLWBT¥WBR11"FENBC' NBT:'NBR 'FSBL' SBT' SBR Lane Configurations ,T. ,h + 9 h Traffic Volume (veh/h) 17 479 12 3 568 11 15 0 10 28 1 49 Future Volume (veh/h) 17 479 12 3 568 11 15 0 10 28 1 49 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1843 1900 1900 1843 1900 1900 1900 1900 1827 1700 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 19 526 13 3 624 12 16 0 11 31 1 54 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 Cap, veh/h 674 1495 37 747 1505 29 77 13 23 168 2 85 Arrive On Green 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.06 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Sat Flow, veh/h 804 1790 44 880 1802 35 329 225 381 1371 26 1422 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 19 0 539 3 0 636 27 0 0 31 0 55 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 804 0 1835 880 0 1837 934 0 0 1371 0 1449 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.6 0.0 6.9 0.1 0.0 8.7 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_ch s 9.3 0.0 6.9 6.9 0.0 8,7 4.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 3.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.02 1.00 0.02 0.59 0.41 1.00 0.98 Lane Grp Cap(c), vet/h 674 0 1532 747 0 1534 113 0 0 168 0 87 V/C Ratio(X)0.03 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.41 0,24 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 674 0 1532 747 0 1534 369 0 0 408 0 340 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.3 0.0 1.9 2.7 0.0 2.1 45.2 0.0 0.0 45.0 0.0 45.9 Ina Delay 02), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.8 Initial Q Delay(c13),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 8.1 1.3 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 2.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.3 0.0 2.6 2.7 0.0 2.9 45.6 0.0 0.0 45.2 0.0 48.8 LnGrp LOS A A A A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 558 639 27 86 Approach Delay, s/veh 2.6 2.9 45.6 47.5 Approach LOS A A D D 9 Timer·1111 1#1 1 3 3I 4 1/ 5Hll7 -IB Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 88.5 11.5 88.5 11.5 Change Period (Y+Rch s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 4 Max Green Setting (Gmax),s 66.0 23.5 66.0 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il), s 10.7 6.0 11.3 5.7 ' ' Green Ext Time (p_c), s 5.8 0.3 5.8 0.3 frit@ %68n Summmy -Appi8/911#Mi HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.6 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 B-9 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: High Ct & 38th Ave Existing Traffic PM Peak Hour IEBmeRF- -777'EBLEBT "EBR " WBL WBT'WBRNBE'1BT le, NBR SBC""SBT-'"SBM Lane Configurations ,A 1 k + r k Traffic Volume (veh/h) 15 695 22 9 615 7 25 2 11 6 1 21 Future Volume (veh/h) 15 695 22 9 615 7 25 2 11 6 1 21 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1864 1900 1900 1881 1900 1900 1851 1900 1900 1813 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 16 755 24 10 668 8 27 2 12 7 1 23 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 658 1517 48 587 1566 19 94 9 18 159 3 76 Arrive On Green 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Sal Flow, veh/h 775 1797 57 704 1855 22 672 168 348 1422 65 1486 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 16 0 779 10 0 676 41 0 0 7 0 24 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 775 0 1854 704 0 1877 1188 0 0 1422 0 1551 Q Serve(g_sh s 0.5 0.0 11.3 0.4 0.0 8.8 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 9.3 0.0 11.3 11.7 0.0 8.8 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.01 0.66 0.29 1.00 0.96 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 658 0 1565 587 0 1585 120 0 0 159 0 79 V/C Ratio(X)0.02 0.00 0.50 0.02 0.00 0.43 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 658 0 1565 587 0 1585 386 0 0 421 0 364 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.0 0.0 2.1 3.7 0.0 1.9 47.1 0.0 0.0 45.2 0.0 45.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOf(*95%),veh/In 0.2 0.0 10.2 0.2 0.0 8.2 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 1.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.1 0.0 3.2 3.7 0.0 2,7 47.7 0.0 0.0 45.3 0.0 46.6 LnGrp LOS A A A A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 795 686 41 31 Approach Delay, siveh 3.2 2.8 47.7 46.3 Approach LOS A A D DTimerli#./" -/...... li-/';.1. /- -.F//1 .% 5'a' "F'7'..1- 1# -. //.Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 89.4 10.6 89.4 10.6 Change Period (Y+Re), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 66.0 23.5 66.0 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 13.7 5.7 13.3 3.5 Green Ext Time (p_ch s 8.4 0.2 8.4 0.2 ihiersectEn Surnmary-r.,-F. .:11:,e.:."ll HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 5.1 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 B-10 West End 38 Traffic Impact Study APPENDIX C 2040 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC LOS WORKSHEETS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Appendix C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Vance St & 38th Ave 2040 Background Traffic AM Peak Hour Movement" - - ·'p- - ,;r EBC'EBT EBR "'WBL "WBT"WBR'"'NBL""NBT 37 NBR 39 SBL 71'F SBT'F SBR Lane Configurations 1 +T•9 +T' 4 4 f Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 525 20 5 650 50 20 5 10 65 5 45 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 525 20 5 650 50 20 5 10 65 5 45 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1809 1900 1900 1816 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1865 1810 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 553 21 5 684 53 21 5 11 68 5 47 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 Cap, vehlh 606 2308 88 711 2590 201 106 31 34 209 13 154 Arrive On Green 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.10 0,10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Sat Flow, veh/h 717 2891 110 851 3244 251 486 302 334 1371 128 1515 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 232 342 5 363 374 37 0 0 73 0 47 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 717 1212 1789 851 1725 1770 1122 0 0 1498 0 1515 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.0 4.8 4.8 0.1 5.4 5.4 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.4 4.8 4.8 4.9 5.4 5.4 4.8 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 2.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.14 0.57 0.30 0.93 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(Ch veh/11 606 968 1428 711 1377 1413 170 0 0 222 0 154 V/C Ratio(X)0.09 0.24 0.24 0.01 0.26 0.26 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 606 968 1428 711 1377 1413 390 0 0 430 0 379 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.5 2.5 2.5 3.1 2.6 2.6 41.8 0.0 0.0 42.3 0.0 41.7 Ina Delay 02), siveh 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay@3),siveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/In 0.8 3.1 4.4 0.1 4.9 5.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 2.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.8 3.1 2.9 3.1 3.0 3.0 42.0 0.0 0.0 42.6 0.0 42.1 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAD D D Approach Vol, veh/h 627 742 37 120 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.1 3.0 42.0 42.4 Approach LOS A A D D Timer :jr m. 4!M F 4,9F 5| 1*8 .1 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 84.8 15.2 84.8 15.2 Change Period (Y+Re), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 25.0 65.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il),s 9.4 6.3 7.4 6.8 Green Ext Time *-4 s 6.4 0.4 6.4 0.4 INWmE SuAR» " : : 1T%%964! 'BAN'?.1,-•rp'*!!FANgkli• Il *m v i €92 '.>M.WA'ye,•"•'»%!.M'4• UAS4 ·i.-i,rm'Fm*,--39-,mE-•m·*Immi'l HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.1 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 (3-1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Vance St & 38th Ave 2040 Background Traffic PM Peak Hour Movementl"I.'...5*BLf"*BT '*FEBR WBL WBY WBR¥ NBMIF NBT NBR ¥SBL *f SBf SBR Lane Configurations 1 +T•9 th + 4 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h)105 715 25 10 660 90 20 5 10 120 5 90 Future Volume (veh/h)105 715 25 10 660 90 20 5 10 120 5 90 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1864 1900 1900 1867 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 111 753 26 11 695 95 21 5 11 126 5 95 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Cap, veh/h 546 2247 78 542 2355 322 91 27 26 247 7 233 Arrive On Green 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 696 2991 103 704 3135 428 230 184 175 1187 47 1567 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 111 314 465 11 393 397 37 0 0 131 0 95 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 696 1249 1845 704 1774 1790 590 0 0 1234 0 1567 Q Serve(g_sh s 6.1 8.4 8.4 0.5 7.1 7.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 13.2 8.4 8.4 8.9 7.1 7.1 11.3 0.0 0.0 10.7 0.0 5.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.24 0.57 0.30 0,96 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 546 938 1386 542 1333 1344 144 0 0 254 0 233 V/C Ratio(X)0.20 0.34 0.34 0.02 0.29 0.30 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 0.41 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 546 938 1386 542 1333 1344 291 0 0 398 0 392 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 6.1 4.1 4.1 5.6 4.0 4.0 38.6 0.0 0.0 40.8 0.0 38.6 Incr Delay 02), s/veh 0.8 1.0 0.7 0.1 0.6 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOK*95%),veh/In 2.3 5.5 7.8 0.2 6.5 6.5 1,8 0.0 0.0 6.3 0.0 4.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 6.9 5.1 4.8 5 7 4.5 4.5 39.0 0.0 0.0 41.4 0.0 39.0 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAD D D Approach Vol, veh/h 890 801 37 226 Approach Delay, s/veh 5.2 4.6 39.0 40.4 Approach LOS A A D D Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 80.1 19.9 80.1 19.9 Change Period (Y+Rch s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 25.0 65.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il), s 15.2 12.7 10.9 13.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 8.9 0.6 8.9 0.6 Intersection Summa. HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 9.6 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 C-2 "1% ¥ -'I'/Arn-A< li:LI#INWn 99-Way Sl .M.ir,<.Yt,Imli i :< 4%:j.t General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (south) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham Street (south) Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Background Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 1.4 + b L +4:3:15.92j I , r 4.-. 0-i-1 / 41 I 'CE-rk L-*- e -_ -17.6/ L 41' 7 i + 7 t Pur Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00110120 000 000 Configuration T R L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)585 15 10 700 10 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 11 0 5 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 11 37 Capacity, c (veh/h)888 369 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.10 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh)00 0.3 Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 15.8 Level of Service, LOS A C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 15.8 Approach LOS C Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010" TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/201*(1:00 AM 38th-Upham(south)_2040Bg_AM.xtw L,-v 9WU ;fl ·;.·/· .: ·' ;'m · 93 General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (south) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham Street (south) Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Background Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 J .1.+ b L Y 7 11'Vt P r Maior Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00110120 000 000 Configuration T R L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)825 15 25 750 20 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No NO No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 26 37 Capacity, c (veh/h)707 192 v/c Ratio 0.04 0,19 95% Queue Length, Cbs (veh)0.1 0.7 Control Delay (s/veh)10.3 28.2 Level of Service, LOS B D Approach Delay (s/veh)0.3 28.2 Approach LOS D Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/201510;31:36 AM 38th-Upham(south)_2040Bg_PM.xtw 6-4 General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (north) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham Street (north) Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Background Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 l A+ + L t-.D - PF. -E t 41% 4 49-- 1 1.21' 7 ttkt-r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01100110 010 010 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h) 60 545 5 15 670 60 5 0 5 30 0 35 Percent Heavy Vehicles (96) 2 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (86) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 63 16 10 69 Capacity, c (veh/h)845 1005 150 166 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.02 0.07 0.42 95% Queue Length, Qgs (veh)0.2 0.0 0.2 1.8 Control Delay (s/veh)9.6 8.6 30.7 41.3 Level of Service, LOS A A D E Approach Delay (s/veh)0.9 0.2 30.7 41.3 Approach LOS D E Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_2040Bg_AM.xtw Generated: 12/8/20119:44 AM Fllf, 1 14>IHCM D Two-waj) Slop-Cdbtrof'ReISMFt General Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes DCJ Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12/8/2016 2040 PM Peak Hour-Background East-West West End 38 Site Information Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 38th Ave/Upham St (north) City of Wheat Ridge 38th Avenue Upham Street (north) 0.95 0.25 1 4 1 -1.*1 L 2 - 4-2 J 4 1 1* Ft- DU J 11 1 14:: C: U 71+Yttr Major Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01100110 010 010 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h) 35 800 5 5 720 45 5 0 5 20 0 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 4 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 37 5 10 68 Capacity, c (veh/h)810 799 102 160 v/c Ratio 0.05 0.01 0.10 0.43 95% Queue Length, Qgs (veh)0.1 0.0 0.3 1.9 Control Delay (s/veh)9.7 9.5 44.3 43.2 Level of Service, LOS A A E E Approach Delay (s/veh)0.4 0.1 44.3 43.2 Approach LOS E E Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_2040Bg_PM.xtw Generated: 12/8/2011-0:21 AM t.-10. 1 -' .. 004,010.000'09-OILI. General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Teller St Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Teller Street Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Background Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 1 1 +E + L 11'+Vt!·r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00100110 000 000 Configuration TR L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)550 30 20 710 35 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles (96) 0 0 4 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (96) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 21 69 Capacity, c (veh/h)978 230 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.30 95% Queue Length, Cbs (veh)0.1 1.2 Control Delay (s/veh)8.8 27.3 Level of Service, LOS A D Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 27.3 Approach LOS D Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/201'z28:02 AM38th-Teller_204089_AM.xtw HCS 2010 Two-Way Stob--»Control 1 -:1·i,gr:..,., $'.itit ' General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Teller St Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Teller Street Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Background Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes 1 4 J At b L C 1 1+Vt P f Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00100110 000 000 Configuration TR L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)770 55 30 705 65 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (96) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 32 126 Capacity, c (veh/h)784 158 v/c Ratio 0.1 5.2 0.04 0.80 95% Queue Length, Qg (veh) Control Delay (s/veh)9.8 83.8 Level of Service, LOS A F Approach Delay (s/veh)0.4 83.8 Approach LOS F Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/20119:00 AM38th-Teller_2040Bg_PM.xtw HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: High Ct & 38th Ave 2040 Background Traffic AM Peak Hour 10189**t' --' -'ip-- -EBL-'EBT -EBR-WBC--WBT -WBR-NBL-NBT --UNBR ' SBL-SBT-SBR Lane Configurations 'it* ,h + 9 t• Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 545 15 5 650 15 20 5 15 35 5 60 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 545 15 5 650 15 20 5 15 35 5 60 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1842 1900 1900 1842 1900 1900 1900 1900 1827 1710 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 574 16 5 684 16 21 5 16 37 5 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 Cap, veh/h 612 1466 41 691 1473 34 75 25 29 177 8 100 Arrive On Green 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 758 1784 50 839 1793 42 289 346 391 1359 108 1362 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 21 0 590 5 0 700 42 0 0 37 0 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 758 0 1833 839 0 1835 1026 0 0 1359 0 1470 Q Serve(g_s),s 0.8 0.0 8.5 0.2 0.0 11.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.8 0.0 8.5 8.6 0.0 11.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 4.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.02 0.50 0.38 1.00 0.93 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 612 0 1507 691 0 1508 129 0 0 177 0 108 V/C Ratio(X)0.03 0.00 0.39 0.01 0.00 0.46 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.63 Avail Cap(c_ah veh/h 612 0 1507 691 0 1508 371 0 0 397 0 345 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.3 0.0 2.3 3.5 0.0 2.6 44.5 0.0 0.0 44.1 0.0 45.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.3 Initial Q Delay(dEs/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 7.9 0.1 0.0 9.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 3.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.4 0.0 3.1 3.5 0.0 3.6 45.0 0.0 0.0 44.3 0.0 47.3 LnGrp LOS A A A A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 611 705 42 105 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.2 3.6 45.0 46.2 Approach LOS A A D D Timet@- 2 11.1 3 W41/ 5 "M;7 ' 8' Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.2 12.8 87.2 12.8 Change Period (Y+Rch s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 66.0 23.5 66.0 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il), s 13.0 7.0 13.8 6.5 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 6.8 0.4 6.8 0.4 Intersection Summarf HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay HCM 2010 LOS 7 7 A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 C-9 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: High Ct & 38th Ave 2040 Background Traffic PM Peak Hour Movement EBL' EBT EBR **BL '=WBT'WBR' NBL NBT 'NBR' SBL ¥ SBT¥ SBR Lane Configurations 1 k ,h + 1 k Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 780 25 15 680 10 30 5 15 10 5 25 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 780 25 15 680 10 30 5 15 10 5 25 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1864 1900 1900 1881 1900 1900 1850 1900 1900 1824 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 821 26 16 716 11 32 5 16 11 5 26 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 609 1496 47 529 1539 24 96 16 23 172 16 83 Arrive On Green 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Sat Flow, veh/h 739 1797 57 661 1848 28 617 255 377 1413 256 1332 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 21 0 847 16 0 727 53 0 0 11 0 31 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 739 0 1854 661 0 1876 1248 0 0 1413 0 1588 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.0 14.1 0.8 0.0 10.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.4 0.0 14.1 14.8 0.0 10.6 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.02 0.60 0.30 1.00 0.84 Lane Grp Cap(ch veh/h 609 0 1544 529 0 1562 136 0 0 172 0 99 V/C Ratio(X)0.03 0.00 0.55 0.03 0.00 0.47 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a),veh/h 609 0 1544 529 0 1562 387 0 0 416 0 373 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 3.8 0.0 2.6 4.9 0.0 2.3 46.2 0.0 0.0 44.2 0.0 44.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 %ile BackOf(*95%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 12.2 0.3 0.0 9.6 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 3.9 0.0 4.0 5.0 0.0 3.3 46.9 0.0 0.0 44.3 0.0 45.5 LnGrp LOS A A A A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 868 743 53 42 Approach Delay, s/veh 4.0 3.3 46.9 45.2 Approach LOS A A D D Timer fll#w- '|1IW2 3 4 MI 511 67 */8 1 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 88.3 11.7 88.3 11.7 Change Period (Y+Rch s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax): s 66.0 23.5 66.0 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il), s 16.8 6.5 16.1 3.9 1 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 9.8 0.2 9.8 0.3 V, r /7"....' 2.c.Lm .v. 41. 1 .,M HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.0 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 C-10 General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Avenue/Site Driveway Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Site Driveway Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Background Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 441+ b L ==rf'Pllf:9*WRK=*lit 1/Awl)%,2,r//Alie 11+Yttr Major Street· East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Numberof Lanes 01200020 000 000 Configuration L T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h)5 595 700 10 5 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (96) O Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 5 10 Capacity, c (veh/h)850 432 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.02 95% Queue Length, (295 (veh)0-0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)9.3 13.5 Level of Service, LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 13.5 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Driveway_2040Bg_AM.xtw Generated: 12/8/206-032:27 AM iER:N General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Avenue/Site Driveway Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Site Driveway Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Background Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes 1 4 l A + b L f 711'Yttr Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01200020 000 000 Configuration L T T TR LR Volume, V (veh/h) 10 835 745 20 5 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles (56) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Left Only 1 Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 11 21 Capacity, c (veh/h)809 474 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.04 95% Queue Length, Q95 (veh)0.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)9.5 12.9 Level of Service, LOS A B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 12.9 Approach LOS B Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™TV'JSC Version 6.90 38th-Driveway_2040Bg_PM.xtw Generated: 12/8/2(6 0·33:01 AM-2 West End 38 Trajfic Impact Study APPENDIX D 2040 TOTAL TRAFFIC LOS WORKSHEETS FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG Appendix D 4 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Vance St & 38th Ave 2040 Total Traffic AM Peak Hour Movement' EBL¥ EBT - EBR WBL ¥WBT"WBR' NBLVPNBT 'NBR V SBLI SBT' SBR Lane Configurations 1 +T•9 +A + 4 1 Traffic Volume (veh/h) 50 545 20 5 665 50 20 5 10 95 5 55 Future Volume (veh/h) 50 545 20 5 665 50 20 5 10 95 5 55 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qbh veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1809 1900 1900 1816 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1864 1810 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 53 574 21 5 700 53 21 5 11 100 5 58 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 5 5 0 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 5 Cap, veh/h 576 2243 82 672 2517 190 93 28 27 223 8 191 Arrive On Green 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 707 2896 106 835 3250 246 292 222 218 1220 61 1520 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 53 240 355 5 371 382 37 0 0 105 0 58 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 707 1212 1790 835 1725 1771 732 0 0 1281 0 1520 Q Serve(g_s), s 2.3 5.6 5.6 0.2 6.2 6,2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 Cycle Q Clearic), s 8.5 5.6 5.6 5.7 6.2 6,2 8.7 0.0 0.0 8.2 0.0 3.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.14 0.57 0.30 0.95 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 576 939 1386 672 1336 1372 148 0 0 231 0 191 V/C Ratio(X)0.09 0.26 0.26 0.01 0.28 0.28 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 576 939 1386 672 1336 1372 332 0 0 405 0 380 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.5 3.2 3.2 4.0 3.2 3.2 40.3 0.0 0.0 41.8 0.0 39.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.3 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay@3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/In 0.9 3.5 5.1 0.1 5.5 5.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 2.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.8 3.8 3.6 4.0 3.8 3.7 40.6 0.0 0.0 42.3 0.0 40.1 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAD D D Approach Vol, veh/h 648 758 37 163 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.8 3.8 40.6 41.5 Approach LOS A A D D Timer 12 734 51 6 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 82.5 17.5 82.5 17.5 Change Period CY+Rch s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 / Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 25.0 65.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il), s 10.5 10.2 8.2 10.7 Green Ext Time (p_ch s 6.6 0.5 6.6 0.5 9# ::f./.:i ._ HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 8.5 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 D-1 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 1: Vance St & 38th Ave 2040 Total Traffic PM Peak Hour Moveinent'-fl.., EBL' EBT EBR -WBL -WBT-WBR-'-hIBL-'NBT ""NBR 'F SBL' SBY' SBR Lane Configurations 1 +$*9 +t, 44 41 Traffic Volume (veh/h)135 740 25 10 675 95 20 10 10 140 5 105 Future Volume (veh/h)135 740 25 10 675 95 20 10 10 140 5 105 Number 5 2 12 1 6 16 3 8 18 7 4 14 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1864 1900 1900 1867 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 779 26 11 711 100 21 11 11 147 5 111 Adj No. of Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 Cap, veh/h 505 2147 72 496 2239 315 80 42 24 261 6 287 Arrive On Green 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 Sat Flow, veh/h 683 2995 100 687 3123 439 145 230 129 1039 35 1570 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 325 480 11 404 407 43 0 0 152 0 111 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 683 1249 1846 687 1774 1788 503 0 0 1074 0 1570 Q Serve(g_sh s 9.6 9.9 10.0 0.6 8.3 8.4 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 18.0 9.9 10.0 10.6 8.3 8.4 15.0 0.0 0.0 14.7 0.0 6.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.25 0.49 0.26 0.97 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c),veh/h 505 895 1323 496 1272 1282 146 0 0 267 0 287 V/C Ratio(X)0.28 0.36 0.36 0.02 0.32 0.32 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.39 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 505 895 1323 496 1272 1282 245 0 0 362 0 393 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 8.5 5.4 5.4 7.4 5.2 5.2 35.0 0.0 0.0 39.4 0.0 35.9 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.3 Initial Q Delay@3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0,0 0,0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/In 3.6 6.7 9.1 0.2 7.7 7.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.0 4.9 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 9.9 6.6 6.2 7.5 5.8 5.8 35.4 0.0 0.0 40.1 0.0 36.2 LnGrp LOS AAAAAAD D D Approach Vol, veh/h 947 822 43 263 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.9 5.9 35.4 38.4 Approach LOS A A D D Timer "-MW:· I" ""'i' VIP"9*2 W/3'74 r 51"F 6 01/7 21/'8 IIF-,F 'I/" ''.291 Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 76.7 23.3 76.7 23.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 65.0 25.0 65.0 25.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il), s 20.0 16.7 12.6 17.0 Green Ext Time (p_ch s 9.6 0.6 9.8 0.6 . ,, .,./ V// id./I' '|| '|!Es:*Il'I 'n,Ii,ilil /4!fll#0'1!!I:/:1/.VIc»%//-..1-=.Infersection Summary ' -1 ..1 HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.1 HCM 2010 LOS B #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 D-2 310 TMb-Way Stop-Control Rep dIFF =11.., . . 22btii:.Jmt ·al·&44 ·. :da:04 .40.· :rd·£28421 General Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes DCJ Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12/8/2016 2040 AM Peak Hour-Total East-West West End 38 Site Information Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 38th Ave/Upham St (south) City of Wheat Ridge 38th Avenue Upham Street (south) 0.95 0.25 1 4 T.11*1 L Fgi<*9)3jefity«-4 ¢f?.34*-ypi- 3 i *frt 1, r Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Not-thbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01110120 000 001 Configuration LTR L T TR LR R Volume, V (veh/h) 10 625 15 10 700 15 10 25 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 11 0 5 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized NO No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 11 11 37 11 Capacity, c (veh/h)846 855 305 619 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.01 0.12 0.02 95% Queue Length, Qgs (veh)0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)9.3 9.3 18.4 10.9 Level of Service, LOS A A C B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.1 0,1 18.4 10.9 Approach LOS C B Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(south)_2040Total_AM.xtw Generated: 12/8/201(45:58 AM I .··I::/I/"';:·.#/i"/:' ri CS ·.'4 · 1' 11?' :7?f.1 General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (south) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham Street (south) Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Total Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J +11+ b L _ 56924-1.U.*%.9464>4.14%14©74'' 1- 4 »• " . 9:ig· tA02 &*00«4*TMet 30'-1. y*¢.,2.- 1'6$.,2 , 9 MES*"5480'ztfg?NIC? pY £·if.. 7 1 +Y TPr Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01110120 000 001 Configuration L T R L T TR LR R Volume, V (veh/h) 15 860 15 25 735 35 20 15 25 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 0 0 0 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (96) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 16 26 37 26 Capacity, c (veh/h)805 684 137 585 v/c Ratio 0.02 0.04 0.27 0.04 95% Queue Length, Qg (veh)0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)9.6 10.5 40.8 11.4 Level of Service, LOS A B E B Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 0.3 40.8 11.4 Approach LOS E B Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(south)_2040Total_PM.xtw Generated: 12/8/2016 10·46:32 AMD-4 5 .... General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (north) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham Street (north) Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Total Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes 3 4 1.4 + k L t*1.4* Wl J 4 16 J· L U Ii+Yttr Major Street: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01100110 010 010 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h) 70 575 5 15 670 70 5 0 5 30 0 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 2 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No NO No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 74 16 10 85 Capacity, c (veh/h)838 979 130 173 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.02 0.08 0A9 95% Queue Length, Cbs (veh)0.3 0.0 0.2 2.4 Control Delay (s/veh)9.7 8.7 35.0 44.3 Level of Service, LOS A A E E Approach Delay (s/veh)1.1 0.2 35.0 44.3 Approach LOS E E Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TV'/SC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_2040Total_AM-no imp.xtw Generated: 12/8/2011-44:23 AM 0-I, ·-Lub ,6."dIA ·921, 117 General Information Ii;HCS 2010 Two-Way St :i j Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes DCJ Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12/8/2016 2040 PM Peak Hour-Total East-West West End 38 Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 38th Ave/Upham St (north) City of Wheat Ridge 38th Avenue Upham Street (north) 0.95 0.25 J 4 11+ b L -,R,=MEL 71+Vttr Maior Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 01100110 010 010 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LTR Volume, V (veh/h) 50 820 5 5 740 65 5 0 5 25 0 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 4 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized NO No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veil/h) 53 5 10 84 Capacity, c (veh/h)781 785 85 141 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.01 0.12 0.60 95% Queue Length, Cbs (veh)0.2 0.0 0.4 3.1 Control Delay (s/veh)9.9 9.6 53.0 62.6 Level of Service, LOS A A F F Approach Delay (s/veh)0.6 0.1 53.0 62.6 Approach LOS F F Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010- TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_2040Total_PM-noimp.xtw Generated: 12/8/201j15:25 AM L -1.- 41 13 4 - --- 6 42; frg I #J General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Upham St (north) Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham Street (north) Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Total Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 lA + b L 7 i tvt P f Maior Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Numberof Lanes 01100110 010 011 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LT R Volume, V (veh/h) 70 575 5 15 670 70 5 0 5 30 0 50 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 2 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (56) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 74 16 10 32 53 Capacity, c (veh/h)838 979 130 88 419 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.02 0.08 0.36 0.13 95% Queue Length, (295 (veh)0.3 0.0 0.2 1.4 0.4 Control Delay (s/veh)9.7 8.7 35.0 67.7 14.8 Level of Service, LOS A A E F B Approach Delay (s/veh)1.1 0.2 35.0 34.7 Approach LOS E D Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_2040Total_AM.xtw Generated: 12/8/201.1-43:49 AM -3 -1 --43 -,5 - d00.. .... ...1 - 1 -4 General Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes DCJ Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12/8/2016 2040 PM Peak Hour-Total East-West West End 38 Site Information Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 38th Ave/Upham St (north) City of Wheat Ridge 38th Avenue Upham Street (north) 0.95 0.25 J 4 J .4 + b L E,J-]9ip;iiF 3TFY!+-4,$*:--r-9--3*=i "Ic* ,m. 1 t R-.dum2112,/265 71+Yttr Major Street East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Numberof Lanes 01100110 010 011 Configuration L TR L TR LTR LT R Volume, V (veh/h) 50 820 5 5 740 65 5 0 5 25 0 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles (56) 4 0 0 0 0 000 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (86) 0 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 53 5 10 26 58 Capacity, c (veh/h)781 785 85 59 382 v/c Ratio 0,07 0.01 0.12 0.44 0.15 95% Queue Length, (295 (veh)0.2 0.0 OA 1.7 0.5 Control Delay (s/veh)9.9 9.6 53.0 108.6 16.1 Level of Service, LOS A A F F C Approach Delay (s/veh)0.6 0.1 53.0 44.7 Approach LOS F E Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010" TWSC Version 6.90 38th-Upham(north)_2040Total_PM.xtw Generated: 12/8/2014:59 AM * m 280 Two-Way Stc@444(k44 General Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Year Time Analyzed Intersection Orientation Project Description Lanes DCJ Felsburg Holt & Ullevig 12/8/2016 2040 AM Peak Hour-Total East-West West End 38 Site Information Intersection Jurisdiction East/West Street North/South Street Peak Hour Factor Analysis Time Period (hrs) 38th Ave/Teller St City of Wheat Ridge 38th Avenue Teller Street 0.95 0.25 J 4 1 -4 + b L / 1 5-YE-j,971-2 496 - I .il-, -12'lkif r =tit - 1 1 17 TPr Major Street· East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Nonhbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of Lanes 00100110 000 000 Configuration TR L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)575 35 20 715 40 30 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 4 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (96) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No NO No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 21 74 Capacity, c (veh/h)952 213 v/c Ratio 0.1 1.5 0.02 0.35 95% Queue Length, Qg5 (vel· Control Delay (s/veh)8.9 30.7 Level of Service, LOS A D Approach Delay (s/veh)0.2 30.7 Approach LOS D Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/201112:18 AM38th-Teller_2040Total_AM.xtw General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection 38th Ave/Teller St Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street 38th Avenue Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Teller Street Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Total Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation East-West Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes J 4 11+ b L 20 K ' ··fi-: f.,rIJ; ti:Ir:1--...11:Al AE-i '4 1* CD 7 1 +Vt P r Major Street· East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority lU 1 2 3 4U 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Numberof Lanes 00100110 000 000 Configuration TR L T LR Volume, V (veh/h)790 60 30 735 70 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 0 0 0 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 32 132 Capacity, c (veh/h)767 144 v/c Ratio 0.04 0.92 95% Queue Length, Qgs (veh)0.1 6.3 Control Delay (s/veh)9.9 115.2 Level of Service, LOS A F Approach Delay (s/veh)0.4 115.2 Approach LOS F Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved.HCS 2010" TWSC Version 6.90 Generated: 12/8/2016 JO·43:06 AM 38th-Teller_2040Total_PM.xtw D- -10 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: High Ct & 38th Ave 2040 Total Traffic AM Peak Hour Movemenf EBL EBT EBR 1'*BL-la WBT¥WBR, NBLF" NBT NBR ¥ SBE¥ SBT"' SBR Lane Configurations 1% T. ,h + 9 k Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 570 15 5 655 15 20 5 15 35 5 60 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 570 15 5 655 15 20 5 15 35 5 60 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1842 1900 1900 1842 1900 1900 1900 1900 1827 1710 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 600 16 5 689 16 21 5 16 37 5 63 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 3 3 0 3 3 0 0 0 4 0 0 Cap, veh/h 608 1468 39 672 1474 34 75 25 29 177 8 100 Arrive On Green 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.82 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.07 Sat Flow, veh/h 754 1786 48 819 1793 42 289 346 391 1359 108 1362 Grp Volume(v),veh/h 21 0 616 5 0 705 42 0 0 37 0 68 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 754 0 1834 819 0 1835 1026 0 0 1359 0 1470 Q Serve@_sh s 0.8 0.0 9.0 0.2 0.0 11.1 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.9 0.0 9.0 9.2 0.0 11.1 5.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 0.0 4.5 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.02 0.50 0.38 1.00 0.93 Lane Grp Cap(ch veh/h 608 0 1507 672 0 1508 129 0 0 177 0 108 V/C Ratio(X)0.03 0.00 0.41 0.01 0.00 0.47 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.63 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 608 0 1507 672 0 1508 371 0 0 397 0 345 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.3 0.0 2.4 3.6 0.0 2.6 44.5 0.0 0.0 44.1 0.0 45.0 Incr Delay 02), siveh 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 2.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(95%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 8.4 0.1 0.0 9.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 3.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.4 0.0 3.2 3.6 0.0 3.6 45.0 0.0 0.0 44.3 0.0 47.3 LnGrp LOS A A A A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 637 710 42 105 Approach Delay, s/veh 3.3 3.6 45.0 46.2 Approach LOS A A D D Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.2 12.8 87.2 12.8 Change Period CY+Rch s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 66.0 23.5 66.0 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+Il), s 13.1 7.0 13.9 6.5 Green Ext Time (p_ch s 7.1 0,4 7,1 0.4 Intersection Summary - ill,I,IllII,- HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.6 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 D-11 HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary 5: High Ct & 38th Ave 2040 Total Traffic PM Peak Hour Irtdvement EBL--EBT " EBR -Wfit--WBT-"WBR -NA[-REST --.NBR -" SBC' SBT -- SBR Lane Configurations 1 k 1 k 4. 9 h Traffic Volume (veh/h) 20 800 25 15 710 10 30 5 15 10 5 25 Future Volume (veh/h) 20 800 25 15 710 10 30 5 15 10 5 25 Number 1 6 16 5 2 12 7 4 14 3 8 18 Initial Q (Qb),veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT)1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1900 1864 1900 1900 1881 1900 1900 1850 1900 1900 1824 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 21 842 26 16 747 11 32 5 16 11 5 26 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cap, veh/h 588 1498 46 516 1540 23 96 16 23 172 16 83 Arrive On Green 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 Sat Flow, veh/h 718 1799 56 648 1849 27 617 255 377 1413 256 1332 Grp VolumeM, veh/h 21 0 868 16 0 758 53 0 0 11 0 31 Grp Sal Flow(s),veh/h/In 718 0 1854 648 0 1877 1248 0 0 1413 0 1588 Q Serve(g_s), s 0.8 0.0 14.7 0.8 0.0 11.3 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_ch s 12.2 0.0 14.7 15.5 0.0 11.3 4.5 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 0.03 1.00 0.01 0.60 0.30 1.00 0.84 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 588 0 1544 516 0 1563 136 0 0 172 0 99 V/C Ratio(X)0.04 0.00 0.56 0.03 0.00 0.49 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.31 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 588 0 1544 516 0 1563 387 0 0 416 0 373 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 4.1 0.0 2.6 5.1 0.0 2.3 46.2 0.0 0.0 44.2 0.0 44.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOE(95%),veh/In 0.3 0.0 12.5 0.3 0.0 10.2 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 4.2 0.0 4.1 5.2 0.0 3.4 46.9 0.0 0.0 44.3 0.0 45.5 LnGrp LOS A A A A D D D Approach Vol, veh/h 889 774 53 42 Approach Delay, siveh 4.1 3.5 46.9 45.2 Approach LOS A A D D Emer2 "/3 HW 4 VI/ 5 V. :lmS"7 1 8 """'= Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 88.3 11.7 88.3 11.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.5 5.0 5.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 66.0 23.5 66.0 23.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 17.5 6.5 16.7 3.9 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 10.5 0.2 10.5 0.3Miersectionsdrnrnary>ei-,7HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.1 HCM 2010 LOS A #116349-01 West End 38 Synchro 9 Report Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Page 1 D-12 7,·j 4613 -'retr _ HCS 2010 Two-Way Ski)-Control Repol General Information Site Information Analyst DCJ Intersection Upham St/Parking Garage Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street Parking Garage Access Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham St Time Analyzed AM Peak Hour-Total Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes 14 1.1.4 k LIt J,1 1 + 6 L 41 11 + Y T F C Major Street North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority 10 11 12 7891U12 3 4U 4 5 6 Numberof Lanes 000 00000100010 Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (veh/h) 10 20 10 130 60 5 Percent Heavy Vehicles (%) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No No No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 32 Capacity, c (veh/h)897 v/c Ratio 0.04 95% Queue Length, Qgs (veh)0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)9.2 Level of Service, LOS A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.2 Approach LOS A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. 11 1525 0.01 0.0 7.4 A 0.6 HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Upham-Driveway_2040Total_AM.xtw Generated: 12/8/26-47:21 AM +ICS 2010 Two-Way Stop-Control Report General Information Site Information Analyst DO Intersection Upham St/Parking Garage Agency/Co.Felsburg Holt & Ullevig Jurisdiction City of Wheat Ridge Date Performed 12/8/2016 East/West Street Parking Garage Access Analysis Year 2040 North/South Street Upham St Time Analyzed PM Peak Hour-Total Peak Hour Factor 0.95 Intersection Orientation North-South Analysis Time Period (hrs)0.25 Project Description West End 38 Lanes 1 4 1 1+ b L U 1 *202.-f,9.ANg.J.. < liFREE-/.a<*32- : -=- 13-i -1.-I k--2-Vi- ---1 4-,-4--2-42504'4----* ZI 8 -- 5 -Il L.--- =W/52 0,·ti J 3-1 1 - -. 319rry 41 .1 1 +Y T PC. Major Street: North-South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement ULTRULTRULTRULTR Priority 10 11 12 7891U12 3 4U 4 5 6 Number of Lanes 000 00000100010 Configuration LR LT TR Volume, V (vel/h) 5 10 35 80 65 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles (96) 3 3 3 Proportion Time Blocked Percent Grade (%) 0 Right Turn Channelized No NO No No Median Type/Storage Undivided Critical and Follow-up Headways Base Critical Headway (sec) Critical Headway (sec) Base Follow-Up Headway (sec) Follow-Up Headway (sec) Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Flow Rate, v (veh/h) 16 Capacity, c (veh/h)890 v/c Ratio 0.02 95% Queue Length, Q (veh)0.1 Control Delay (s/veh)9.1 Level of Service, LOS A Approach Delay (s/veh)9.1 Approach LOS A Copyright © 2016 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved. 37 1511 0.02 0.1 7.4 A 2.4 HCS 2010™ TWSC Version 6.90 Upham-Driveway._2040Total_PM.xtw Generated: 12/8/2C*-rr8:01 AM WEST END 38 WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT PREPARED: DECEMBER 9, 2016 REVISED: Prepared By: Kimley»>Horn St [fil-1.3,\(1.16.ILE) TABLE OF CONTENTS PREPARER'S CERTIFICATION INTRODUCTION SITE LOCATION SITE DESCRIPTION HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAJOR BASIN DESCRIPTION SUB-BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM REGULATIONS DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA RUNOFF (HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA) DETENTION CRITERIA HYDRAULIC CRITERIA CONCLUSION COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS FLOOD HAZARD REFERENCES APPENDIX A - HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS APPENDIX B - DETENTION VAULT PLAN AND CALCULATIONS APPENDIX C - DRAINAGE PLAN APPENDIX D - FLOODPLAIN AND NRCS DATA APPENDIX E - EXISTING STUDIES WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT October 25, 2016 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 6 8 10 11 11 11 11 4 PREPARER'S CERTIFICATION This Drainage Report (the Report) has been prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, in substantial accordance with the requirements of the City of Wheat Ridge (CoWR) Site Drainage Requirements Manual. Dennis M. Sobieski, P.E. Registered Professional Engineer State of Colorado No. 42233 3 WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE | PRELIMNARY DRAINAGE REPORT December 9, 2016 INTRODUCTION The intent of this Preliminary Drainage Report (the Report) is to provide drainage guidance for the development of the proposed new development West End 38. This report will identify approximate sub basins that will determine the runoff for the new developed site. An underground detention vault with sand filter is proposed for the site due to the limited amount of space for above ground storage and/or treatment. This Report has been prepared to support the current development applications with the intent to outline proposed measurements to meet City requirements relative to stormwater treatment and attenuation for the new development of the Site (as defined below). SITE LOCATION The Project is located on a parcel of land lying in the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. The project is located within the City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado. More specifically, the Project is generally bounded by the following: • North - Existing Parking Lot • East - Upham Street • South - West 38th Avenue • West - Vance Street Further identification of the adjacent land uses may be referenced within the maps included within the Appendices of this Report. SITE DESCRIPTION The West End 38 Development, located at the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street, consists of an approximately 3.3-acre parcel. There are currently two existing commercial buildings on site. Both existing buildings will be razed for the new development. This report will outline the drainage requirements for the proposed new development. Existing topography consists of a 1 -story and 2-story commercial building with paved parking lots, and an undeveloped area with vegetation and a paved drive. A Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey for the Project area was used to determine the soil characteristics of the Site. Soils were determined to consist of Nunn-Urban Land Complex (0-2 Percent Slopes). The corresponding predominant Hydrologic Soil Group for onsite soils may be classified as NRCS Type C. The NRCS study is included in Appendix D. The Site has an average gradient of approximately 2.90-percent from southeast to northwest. There are no known major drainage ways or drainage facilities located within the Site. There is no known history of flooding associated with the Site. The drainage designs presentdd herein will focus on providing overall guidance of storm sewer and detention facilities for the Site. A drainage map is provided in Appendix C. WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT October 25, 2016 . HISTORIC DRAINAGE SYSTEM --.----„..-I MAJOR BASIN DESCRIPTION The western portion of the existing stormwater runofffrom the Site is conveyed from the existing commercial parking lot west to Vance Street where it enters the existing storm system. The east portion is conveyed onto Upham Street. The south portion is conveyed to 38th Avenue. The remaining stormwater flows north where it is collected on site. SUB-BASIN AND SITE DRAINAGE Most the existing drainage was conveyed off-site with no water quality treatment or stormwater attenuation. The areas previously flowed to 38th Avenue, Vance Street and Upham Street while a portion was retained on site. The majority of these flows will now be directed to the proposed underground detention pond with sand filter before entering the existing storm water system within Upham Street while a small portion will still be conveyed offsite without treatment. The existing cumulative release rates leaving the Site are summarized below: Basin El (to Vance Street): 0 5-year Storm Event = 1.86 cfs 0 100-year Storm Event = 4.19 cfs Basin E2 (retained on site at the north end of the property): 0 5-year Storm Event = 1.69 efs 0 100-year Storm Event = 6.40 cfs Basin E3 (to W 38th Avenue): 0 5-year Storm Event = 0.68 efs 0 100-year Storm Event=1.62 cfs Basin E4 (to Upham Street): 0 5-year Storm Event = 2.48 cfs 0 100-year Storm Event = 9.73 cfs Detailed runoff calculations are provided in Appendix A and an existing drainage map outlining sub-basins is provided in Appendix C. PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM REGULATIONS The current "City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainage Requirements" (the "Criteria") and the "Urban Drainage and Flood Control District Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual" Volumes 1,2, and 3 (the "Manual"), with latest revisions, were referenced and utilized in the design and analysis of the drainage for the Project. DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA Proposed storm drainage facilities will be designed to comply with the Criteria and the Manual. Site drainage is not significantly impacted by such constraints as utilities or existing development. Further detail WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I PRELIMNARY DRAINAGE REPORT December 9,2016 regarding proposed drainage patterns may be referenced in the Drainage Facility Design section within this Report. RUNOFF (HYDROLOGIC CRITERIA) Hydrologic design criteria utilized to analyze runoff conditions consists of the Rational Method. The Manual allows the Rational Method for sub-basins less than 160 acres in size. An overview of the Rational Method is outlined below with a brief synopsis of the relevant criteria which was utilized in design calculations. Rational Method Discharge Equation Q = CIA Q = Maximum Rate of Runoff in Cubic Feet per Second (CFS) C = Runoff Coefficient (Calculated on an individual basin weighted basis utilizing Runoff Coefficients in accordance with Table RO-5 of the Criteria) 1 = Rainfall Intensity in Inches per Hour (In/Hr) (Calculated based on individual basin drainage conveyance methods, Time of Concentration and Rainfall Intensity Values in accordance with Figure 5.1 of the Criteria) A = Basin Area in Acres (Ac) (Determined based upon proposed site grading and drainage characteristics) Runoff conditions and the analysis utilized in the preparation of this Report consist of design intervals as identified the Criteria include: o Minor Storm: 5-year Storm Event • 5-year allowable release rate: 0.17 cfs o Major Storm: 100-year Storm Event • 100-year allowable release rate: 1.00 cfs MAJOR BASIN DESCRIPTION The 3.3-acre area proposed to be developed has been divided into sub basins Rl-R2, Al-A4 and 031- OS3 as described below. This report, as required by the City, will define the boundary and scope of each sub-basin. Any existing on-site storm sewer will be removed and accommodated with the proposed development. SUB BASIN DESCRIPTION Developed runoff conditions for the Project were calculated utilizing the previously referenced Hydrologic Criteria. The sub-basins are defined as follows: SUB-BASIN Rl Sub-Basin Rl consists of the apartment and mixed use building roof areas. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected within proposed roof drains which are routed to the underground detention vault and then ouffalls to the proposed storm sewer system within Upham Street. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT 6 October 25, 2016 Area Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (Acres) (%)(Q5)(Qioo) 2.00 AC 90%6.64 CFS 14.47 CFS SUB-BASIN R2 Sub-Basin R2 consists of the proposed bank roof area. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected within proposed roof drains which are routed to the underground detention vault and then outfalls to the proposed storm sewer system within Upham Street. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (%) (Q5)(Qloo) 90%0.19 CFS 0.41 CFS SUB-BASIN Al Sub-Basin Al consists of the east parking lot adjacent Vance Street. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected by a catch basin (design point 1) which is routed to the underground detention vault and then outfalls to the proposed storm sewer system within Upham Street. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (%) (Q5)(Qioo) 95%1.23 CFS 2.59 CFS SUB-BASIN A2 Sub-Basin A2 consists of the proposed drive along the southern side of the proposed apartment building and the proposed bank drive through. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected by a catch basin (design point 2) which is routed to the underground detention vault and then outfalls to the proposed storm sewer system within Upham Street. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Area Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (Acres) (%)(Q5)(Qloo) 0.43 AC 93%1.61 CFS 3.44 CFS SUB-BASIN A3 Sub-Basin A3 consists of a portion of the south entrance from 38th Avenue. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected by a catch basin (design point 3) which is routed to the underground detention vault and then outfalls to the proposed storm sewer system within Upham Street. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Area Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (Acres) (%)(Q5)(Qioo) 0.14 AC 95%0.55 CFS 1.17 CFS SUB-BASIN A4 Sub-Basin A4 consists of a portion of the walkway in between the proposed apartment building and proposed mixed use building. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected by an area drain (design point 4) 7 WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I PRELIMNARY DRAINAGE REPORT December 9, 2016 which is routed to the underground detention vault and then outfalls to the proposed storm sewer system within Upham Street. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Area Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (Acres) (%)(Q5)(Qloo) 0.03 AC 100%0.13 CFS 0.27 CFS SUB-BASIN OSl Sub-Basin 0S1 consists of the south and west edges of the property adjacent to Upham Street and 38th Avenue. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected in the existing storm sewer system located within the adjacent flow lines. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Area Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (Acres) (%)(Q5)(Qloo) 0.20 AC 86%0.68 CFS 1.52 CFS SUB-BASIN OS2 Sub-Basin OS2 consists of the north and east edges of the parking garage. Runoff from this sub-basin will discharge to the north and the east. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Area Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (Acres)Cio)(Q5)(Qloo) 0.09 AC 2%0.02 CFS 0.40 CFS SUB-BASIN OS3 Sub-Basin OS3 consists of the landscape island within the west parking lot adjacent to Vance Street. Runoff from this sub-basin will be collected in the existing storm sewer system that exists within Vance Street. Corresponding sub-basin characteristics are anticipated as follows: Area Imperviousness 5-Year Runoff 100-Year Runoff (Acres) (%)(Q5)(Qloo) 0.05 AC 15%0.04 CFS 0.27 CFS Detailed runoff calculations are in Appendix A. A drainage map outlining the sub-basins is provided in Appendix C. OFFSITE RUN-ON No areas are anticipated to run-on to this site. DETENTION CRITERIA Because the proposed area of development is greater than one (1) acre, the site is considered to be a Major New Development with full attenuation and water quality detention being required fordisturbed areas. Since water quality and stormwater detention is required onsite, design computations for onsite detention storage and release rates are required. As previously mentioned, the majority of the existing drainage is conveyed off-site with little to no water quality treatment or stormwater attenuation. The proposed new development is designed such that the majority of stormwater passes through the proposed underground WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT October 25, 2016 detention facility with sand filter before entering the existing storm sewer within Upham Street while a small portion runs off site without any treatment. The Criteria outlines the City's design requirements for designing and calculating the required water quality and detention for the Project. The Site will utilize the standard Underground Detention facility design with full flood attenuation and Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) equal to the 1 00-year event plus 50% WQCV. The storm sewer system and underground detention vault will be designed to account for the flows of the full tributary area. See Drainage Plan in Appendix C. The maximum allowable releases for the onsite detention facility is 0.56 cfs for the 5-year storm event and 3.33 cfs for the 100-year storm event, respectively. The following design volumes are based on an underground detention facility: • WQCV = 0.10 acre-feet • 5-year plus 100% WQCV = 0.22 acre-feet • 100-year plus 50% WQCV = 0.57 acre-feet The underground detention facility has been designed with a sand filter, 1' minimum freeboard and a gravity discharge pipe which will tie into an existing manhole within Upham Street. The outlet structure for the facility has been designed to meet the Criteria and Manual for Underground Detention Facility. Specific design details for the facility are outlined below. The water quality and underground stormwater detention vault has a 100-year volume of approximately 0.52 acre-feet of capacity, which meets the required volume. The 7.67 foot deep vault has a water surface elevation of 5428.33 and a bottom elevation of 5421.93. The outfall structure will be a gravity discharge pipe with an orifice plate designed to release the WQCV within 40 hours. Vault calculations and details are provided in Appendix B. The following sections detail the design criteria used to calculate the above design. WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME Applicable water quality design criteria utilized within the analysis of the proposed water quality facility consists of the following criteria as referenced within Volume 3, Section 4.4.2 of the Manual. Vwocv = (WQCV / 12) * A WQCV=a*(0.91 7 - 1.19 F+ 0.78 i) VWQCV =Required Storage Volume (acre-feet) A=Basin Area in Acres (Ac) (Determined based upon proposed project characteristics) WQCV =Water Quality Capture Volume (watershed inches) a=Coefficient corresponding to WQCV drain time i = Percent Imperviousness of Basin (Calculated on an individual basin weighted basis utilizing Runoff Coefficients in accordance with Table RO-3 of the Criteria) DETENTION STORAGE VOLUME Storage volume and release rates utilized in the preparation of this Report are outlined within the Criteria. The Criteria allows Underground Detention facility as a detention method that will be used for onsite stormwater detention facilities. WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I PRELIMNARY DRAINAGE REPORT December 9,2016 The design storm event frequencies required as identified the Criteria include: o Minor Storm: 5-year Storm Event o Major Storm: 100-year Storm Event Equations SO-1 through SO-4 in Volume 2 of the Manual outline the required flood control detention requirements for the minor and major storm events. 5-vear Storm Event K5 = (0.77i - 2.65) / 1,000 V5 = 1<5 * A 100-vear Storm (For NRCS Soil Types B,C, and Dj Kioo = (1.781 - 0.00212 - 3.56) / 900 Vloo = Kioo * A Vi = required volume where subscript i=50rl 00-year storm, as appropriate (acre-feet) Ki = Empirical volume coefficient where subscript i=50rl 00-year storm, as appropriate i = Fully Developed Percent Imperviousness of Basin (Calculated on an individual basin weighted basis utilizing Runoff Coefficients in accordance with Table 6-6 of the Criteria) A = Tributary Basin Area in Acres (Ac) The above reference empirical formulas are shown for reference. The Full Spectrum Worksheet in the UD- Detention Spreadsheet performs these calculations for the 1 00-year event. Detention calculations are located in Appendix A. RELEASE RATES Allowable Unit Release Rates are identified in Table SO-1 of the Manual (Volume 2) and include the following for NRCS Soil Group C and D. Storm Event 5-year 100-year Allowable Redeveloped Total Allowable Runoff from Total Site Release Rate Acres Release Offsite Basins Release (cfs/acre)(Acre)(cfs)(cfs)(cfs) 0.17 3.3 0.56 0.74 1.30 1.00 3.3 3.33 2.19 5.52 Detailed detention calculations are in Appendix B. HYDRAULIC CRITERIA Hydraulic design criteria utilized in the analysis of proposed drainage systems consists of provisions as outlined within the Criteria and the Manual as follows: GUTTER CAPACITY AND INLET HYDRAULICS The development design will include a private internal storm sewer network including inlets to capture runoff and direct to the proposed water quality and detention pond. Applicable design methods are utilized to size proposed storm sewer inlets, which include the use of UD-Inlet, (latest version) spreadsheets and nomographs. WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT October 25, 2016 The gutter capacity and inlet hydraulic analysis consists of design intervals as outlined by the following design storm events: o Minor Storm: 5-year Storm Event o Major Storm: 100-year Storm Event CONCLUSION This Final Drainage Report will guide the drainage design of the development of this site. The existing development has no provisions for flood attenuation or water quality; therefore, as the site is developed, this drainage concept will help improve drainage patterns and improve water quality. The table below summarizes the improvements that this project will provide. Storm Event 5-Year 100-Year Existing Proposed Percent Runoff Release Reduction (cfs)(cfs) (%) 6.71 1.30 81 % 21.94 5.52 75 % COMPLIANCE WITH STANDARDS Proposed drainage designs associated with the Project have been designed in accordance with applicable City of Wheat Ridge and Urban Drainage and Flood Control District requirements and guidelines. The Project is not anticipated to adversely affect the existing storm sewer facilities to which they discharge. Water quality and stormwater detention for the Site will be provided within the onsite underground detention facility located in the northeast portion of the site. The design of the system will release flows at the Maximum Unit Flow Release Rates allowed. FLOOD HAZARD By scaled map location and graphical review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panel 08059C0214F, dated February 5, 2014, the Site lies within an area classified as Zone X. Areas classified as Zone X are considered areas of minimal flood hazard, usually depicted by Flood Insurance Rate Maps as areas outside of the 500-year flood plain. A copy of the FIRM is enclosed for reference in Appendix D. REFERENCES City of Wheat Ridge Site Drainaqe Requirements - Prepared by the City of Wheat Ridge; Dated October 2014. Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual - Volumes 1-3 - Prepared by the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District; Current Revision November 2010. 11 WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I PRELIMNARY DRAINAGE REPORT December 9,2016 APPENDIX A - HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT 12 October 25, 2016 W 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Wheat Ridge, CO Checked by: DS Rainfall Intensity IDF - Intensity, Duration, Frequency Data Time Intensity Frequency Tabulation TIME 2 YR 5 YR 10 YR 100 YR 5 3.22 4.55 5.26 8.72 10 2.57 3.63 4.19 6.95 11 2.47 3.49 4.04 6.69 12 2.38 3.36 3.89 6.45 13 2.30 3.25 3.76 6.23 14 2.23 3.14 3.63 3.02 15 2.16 3.04 3.52 5.83 16 2.09 2.95 3.41 5.66 17 2.03 2.86 3.31 5.49 18 1.97 2.78 3.22 5.34 19 1.92 2.71 3.13 5.19 20 1.87 2.64 3.05 5.06 21 1.82 2.57 2.97 4.93 22 1.78 2.51 2.90 4.81 23 1.73 2.45 2.83 4.69 24 1.69 2.39 2.76 4.58 25 1.66 2.34 2.70 4.48 26 1.62 2.28 2.64 4.38 27 1.58 2.24 2.59 4.29 28 1.55 2.19 2.53 4.20 29 1.52 2.14 2.48 4.11 30 1.49 2.10 2.43 4.03 31 1.46 2.06 2.39 3.95 32 1.43 2.02 2.34 3.88 33 1.41 1.99 2.30 3.81 34 1.38 1.95 2.26 3.74 35 1.36 1.92 2.22 3.68 36 1.34 1.88 2.18 3.61 37 1.31 1.85 2.14 3.55 38 1.29 1.82 2.11 3.49 39 1.27 1.79 2.07 3.44 40 1.25 1.76 2.04 3.38 41 1.23 1.74 2.01 3.33 42 1.21 1.71 1.98 3.28 43 1.19 1.69 0.95 3.23 44 1.18 1.66 1.92 3.19 45 1.16 1.64 1.89 3.14 46 1.14 1.61 1.87 3.10 47 1.13 1.59 1.84 3.05 48 1.11 1.57 1.82 3.01 49 1.10 1.55 1.79 2.97 50 1.08 1.53 1.77 2.93 51 1.07 1.51 1.75 2.89 52 1.06 1.49 1.72 2.86 53 1.04 1.47 1.70 2.82 54 1.03 1.45 1.68 2.79 55 1.02 1.44 1.66 2.75 56 1.01 1.42 1.64 2.72 57 0.99 1.40 1.62 2.69 58 0.98 1.39 1.60 2.66 59 0.97 1.37 1.58 2.63 60 0.96 1.35 1.57 2.60 Note: Intensity values utilized as published within the City and County of Denver Storm Drainage Design & Technical Criteria Manual, Chapter 5, Table 5.3. K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Filter Sizing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Whest Ridge, CO Checked by: DS Composite Proposed Basin Calculations Basin Rl Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 0 0%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 87,073 100%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 0 0%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 87,073 100%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Basin RZ Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 0 0%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 2,494 100%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 0 0%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 2,494 100% .90%-0.73 0.75 0.83 Basin Al Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 668 5%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 13,152 95%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 13,820 100% .91%-- - 99 9.89_ 0:94 - j Basin A2 Area (sf)Basin % I (2 C5 (100 Landscaped Area 1,288 .7%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 17,249 93%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 18,537 100%93% - -0 83- - --3.85 - 0.93 Basin A3 Area (sf)Basin % I (2 (5 (100 Landscaped Area 328 5%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 5,934 95%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 6,262 100%95%0.85 0.86 0.94 Basin A4 Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 0 0%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 1,417 100%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 1,417 100%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 Basin 0S1 Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 1,255 15%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 7,257 85%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 8,513 100%86%0.77 0.79 0.89 Basin OS2 Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 3,981 100%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 0 0%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 3,981 100%2%.0.05 0.16 0.50 Basin OS3 Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 2,062 86%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 326 14%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 2,387 100%15%0.16 0.26 0.56 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Filter Sizing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Wheat Ridge, CO Checked by: DS Time of Concentration - Proposed Basins SUB-BASIN DATA DESIGN DRAIN AREA AREA |WEIGHTED NRCS 4 POINT BASIN SF AC %Soil Type Basin Rl 87,073 2.00 90%C 0.75 INITIAL/OVERLANDTIME TRAVEL TIME T(c) CHECK TW T(t)(URBANIZED BASINS) Length Slope Ti Length Slope Conveyance Velocity T-r Tc Length Check FT % IMIN FT % Coefficient fps MIN MIN FT MIN 0 1.0%0.0 0 0,5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 FINAL TC (MIN) 5.0 Basin R2 2,494 0.06 90%C 0.75 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin Al 13,820 0.32 95%C 0.86 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin A2 18,537 0.43 93%C 0.85 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin A3 6,262 0.14 95%C 0.86 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin A4 1,417 0.03 100%C 0.90 0 1.0%0.0 0 0,5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin 0S1 8,513 0.20 86%C 0.79 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin OS2 3,981 0.09 2%C 0.16 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin 053 2,387 0.05 15%C 0.26 0 10%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Total:144,484 3.3 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\-Project Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Filter Sizing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Checked by: DSWheat Ridge, CO Proposed CIA Runoff Calculations 2-Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure)1 BASIN INFORMATON DIRECT RUNOFF DESIGN DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c)Cx A I Q POINT BASIN ac.COEFF min in/hr cfs REMARKS Basin Rl 2.00 0.73 5.0 1.46 3.22 4.70 Basin R2 0.06 0.73 5.0 0.04 3.22 0.13 Basin Al 0.32 0.85 5.0 0.27 3.22 0.87 Basin A2 0.43 0.83 5.0 0.35 3.22 1.14 Basin A3 0.14 0.85 5.0 0.12 3.22 0.39 Basin A4 0.03 0.89 5.0 0.03 3.22 0.09 Basin 0S1 0.20 0.77 5.0 0.15 3.22 0.48 Basin OS2 0.09 0.05 5.0 0.00 3.22 0,01 Basin 053 0.05 0.16 5.0 0.01 3.22 0.03 7.85 K:\DEN__Civil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Filter Sizing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Checked by: DSWheat Ridge, CO Proposed CIA Runoff Calculations 5-Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations [Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATON DIRECTRUNOFF DESIGN DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c)Cx A I Q POINT BASIN ac,COEFF min in/hr cfs REMARKS Basin Rl 2.00 0.73 5.0 1.46 4.55 6.64 Basin R2 0.06 0.73 5.0 0.04 4.55 0.19 Basin Al 0.32 0.85 5.0 0.27 455 1.23 Basin A2 0.43 0.83 5.0 0.35 4.55 1.61 Basin A3 0.14 0.85 5.0 0.12 4.55 0.55 Basin A4 0.03 0.89 5.0 0.03 4.55 0.13 Basin 0S1 0.20 0.77 5.0 0.15 4.55 0.68 Basin OS2 0.09 0.05 5.0 0.00 4.55 0.02 Basin OS3 0.05 0.16 5.0 0.01 4.55 0.04 11.09 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\_Project Files\Eng\Drainage\PreliminarY Drainage\Calculations\Filter Sizing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Checked by: DSWheat Ridge, CO Proposed CIA Runoff Calculations 100-Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATON DIRECTRUNOFF DESIGN DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c)Cx A I Q POINT BASIN ac.COEFF min in/hr efs REMARKS Basin Rl 2.00 0.83 5.0 1.66 8.72 14.47 Basin R2 0.06 0.83 5.0 0.05 8.72 0.41 Basin Al 0.32 0.94 5.0 0.30 8.72 2.59 Basin A2 0.43 093 5.0 0.39 8.72 3.44 Basin A3 0.14 0.94 5.0 0.13 8.72 1.17 Basin A4 0.03 0.96 5.0 0.03 8.72 0.27 Basin 0S1 0.20 0.89 5.0 0.17 8.72 1,52 Basin OS2 0.09 0.50 5.0 0.05 8.72 0.40 Basin OS3 0.05 0.56 5.0 0.03 8.72 0.27 24.55 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Filter Sizing CIA.xls T 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Wheat Ridge, CO Checked by: DS Proposed Basin Direct Runoff Summary Table DESIGN DRAIN AREA 02 05 0100 POINT BASIN (AC)(CFS)(CFS)(CFS) Basin Rl 2.00 4.70 6.64 14.47 Basin R2 0.06 0.13 0.19 0.41 Basin Al 0.32 0.87 1.23 2.59 Basin A2 0.43 1.14 1.61.3.44 Basin A3 0.14 0.39 0.55 1.17 Basin A4 0.03 0.09 0.13 0.27 Basin 0S1 0.20 0.48 0.68 1.52 Basin OS2 0.09 0.01 0.02 0.40 Basin OS3 0.05 0.03 0.04 0.27 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Filter Sizing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by; KP Wheat Ridge, CO Checked by: DS Rainfall Intensity IDF -Intensity, Duration, Frequency Data Time Intensity Frequency Tabulation TIME 2 YR 5 YR 10 YR 100 YR 5 3.22 4.55 5.26 8.72 10 2.57 3.63 4.19 6.95 11 2.47 3.49 4.04 6.69 12 2.38 3.36 3.89 6.45 13 2.30 3.25 3.76 6.23 14 2.23 3.14 3.63 3.02 15 2.16 3.04 3.52 5.83 16 2.09 2.95 3.41 5.66 17 2.03 2.86 3.31 5.49 18 1.97 2.78 3.22 5.34 19 1.92 2.71 3.13 5.19 20 1.87 2.64 3.05 5.06 21 1.82 2.57 2.97 4.93 22 1.78 2.51 2.90 4.81 23 1.73 2.45 2.83 4.69 24 1.69 2.39 2.76 4.58 25 1.66 2.34 2.70 4.48 26 1.62 2.28 2.64 4.38 27 1.58 2.24 2.59 4.29 28 1.55 2.19 2.53 4.20 29 1.52 2.14 2.48 4.11 30 1.49 2.10 2.43 4.03 31 1.46 2.06 2.39 3.95 32 1.43 2.02 2.34 3.88 33 1.41 1.99 2.30 3.81 34 1.38 1.95 2.26 3.74 35 1.36 1.92 2.22 3.68 36 1.34 1.88 2.18 3.61 37 1.31 1.85 2.14 3.55 38 1.29 1.82 2.11 3.49 39 1.27 1.79 2.07 3.44 40 1.25 1.76 2.04 3.38 41 1.23 1.74 2.01 3.33 42 1.21 1.71 1.98 3.28 43 1.19 1.69 0.95 3.23 44 1.18 1.66 1.92 3.19 45 1.16 1.64 1.89 3.14 46 1.14 1.61 1.87 3.10 47 1.13 1.59 1.84 3.05 48 1.11 1.57 1.82 3.01 49 1.10 1.55 1.79 2.97 50 1.08 1.53 1.77 2.93 51 1.07 1.51 1.75 2.89 52 1.06 1.49 1.72 2.86 53 1.04 1.47 1.70 2.82 54 1.03 1.45 1.68 2.79 55 1.02 1.44 1.66 2.75 56 1.01 1.42 1.64 2.72 57 0.99 1.40 1.62 2.69 58 0.98 1.39 1.60 2.66 59 0.97 1.37 1.58 2.63 60 0.96 1.35 1.57 2.60 Note: Intensity values utilized as published within the City and County of Denver Storm Drainage Design & Technical Criteria Manual, Chapter 5, Table 5.3. K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38'LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Existing CIA.xls 09331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Checked by: DSWheat Ridge, CO Composite Existing Basin Calculations Basin El Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 3,899 16%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 19,783 84%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 23,682 100%84%0.75 0.78 0.88 Basin E2 Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 31,345 63%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 11,413 23%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 7,086 14%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 49,844 100%36%0.33 0.40 0.64 Basin E3 Area (sf)Basin % I C2 C5 C100 Landscaped Area 2,310 24%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 0 0%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 7,232 76%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 9,542 100%76%0.69 0.72 0.85 Basin E4 Area (sf)Basin % i (2 (5 (100 Landscaped Area 51,090 68%2%0.05 0.16 0.50 Roofs 4,116 5%90%0.73 0.75 0.83 Drive & Walks 20,482 27%100%0.89 0.90 0.96 75,688 100%33%0.31 0.39 0.64 K:\DEN-Civil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Existing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Checked by: DSWheat Ridge, CO Time of Concentration - Existing Basins SUB-BASIN DATA DESIGN DRAIN AREA AREA |WEIGHTED NRCS C5 POINT BASIN SF AC %Soil Type Basin El 23,682 0.54 84%C 0.78 INITIAL/OVERLANDTIME TRAVELTIME T(c) CHECK T(i) T(t) (URBANIZED BASINS) Length Slope L Length Slope Conveyance Velocity Tr Tc Length Check FT % MIN FT % Coefficient fps MIIN MIN FT MIN 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 FINAL TC (MIN) 5.0 Basin E2 49,844 1.14 36%C 0.40 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin E3 9,542 0.22 76%C 0.72 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Basin E4 75,688 1.74 33%C 0.39 0 1.0%0.0 0 0.5% 20 1.4 0.0 5.0 0 5.0 Total:158,756 3.6 K:\DEN__CIvil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Existing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Checked by: DSWheat Ridge, CO Existing CIA Runoff Calculations 2-Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations [Rational Method Procedure)| BASIN INFORMATON DIRECT RUNOFF DESIGN DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c)Cx A I Q POINT BASIN ac.COEFF min in/hr cfs REMARKS Basin El 0.54 0.75 5.0 0.41 3.22 1.32 Basin E2 1.14 0.33 5.0 0.37 3.22 1.20 Basin E3 0.22 0.69 5.0 0.15 3.22 0.48 Basin E4 1.74 0.31 5.0 0.55 3.22 1.76 4.76 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Existing CIA.xl. 096331009 Calculated by: KPWest End 38 Wheat Ridge, CO Checked by: DS Existing CIA Runoff Calculations 5-Year Design Storm Runo# Calculations [Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATON DIRECT RUNOFF DESIGN DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c)Cx A I Q POINT BASIN ac.COEFF min in/hr cfs REMARKS Basin El 0.54 0.75 5.0 0.41 4.55 1.86 Basin E2 1.14 0.33 5.0 0.37 4.55 1,69 Basin E3 0.22 0.69 5.0 0.15 4.55 0.68 Basin E4 1.74 0.31 5.0 0.55 4.55 2.48 6.72 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\_Project Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Existing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Checked by: DS IWheat Ridge, CO Existing CIA Runoff Calculations 100-Year Design Storm Runoff Calculations (Rational Method Procedure) BASIN INFORMATON DIRECT RUNOFF DESIGN DRAIN AREA RUNOFF T(c)Cx A I Q POINT BASIN ac.COEFF min in/hr cfs REMARKS Basin El 0.54 0.88 5.0 0.48 8.72 4.19 Basin E2 1.14 0.64 5.0 0.73 8.72 6.40 Basin E3 0.22 0.85 5.0 0.19 8.72 1.62 Basin E4 1.74 0.64 5.0 1.12 8.72 9.73 21.94 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\Project Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Existing CIA.xls 096331009 West End 38 Calculated by: KP Wheat Ridge, CO Checked by: DS Existing Basin Direct Runoff Summary Table DESIGN DRAIN AREA 02 04 0,00 POINT BASIN (AC)(CFS)(CFS)(CFS) Basin El 0.54 1.32 1.86 4.19 Basin E2 1.14 1.20 1.69 6.40 Basin E3 0.22 0.48 0.68 1.62 Basin E4 1.74 1.76 2.48 9.73 K:\DEN_Civil\096331009. WestEnd38LProject Files\Eng\Drainage\Preliminary Drainage\Calculations\Existing CIA. xds . A35NA/,i/,,A/A/4,,,,,S . 13 WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I PRELIMNARY DRAINAGE REPORT December 9,2016 Kimley»>Horn 4582 S. Ulster Street - Suite 1500 Denver, Colorado 80237 Project:West End 38 KBPPrepared By: Project Number:096331009 Checked By:DMS Date:9-Dec-16 Regional Detention Storage Volume (V=KA Method) Contributing Basin Characteristics Area Impervious (AC) (%) Site Area =3.33 90.0% Water Quality Capture Volume UDFCD V3 Equation 3-1 WQ Watershed Inches = a'(0.9113-1.1914.078i) 812 = 0.8 (12-Hr Drain Time) a24-0.9 (24-Hr Drain Time) a40= 1.0 (40-Hr Drain Time) UDFCD VB Equation 3-3 WQCV= (WQCV/12)*(Area) WQCV Impervious (Site) =90.0% a=09 WQ Watershed Inches (Site) =0.361 WQCV Area (Site) =3.33 Wa Capture Volume (Site) =0.100 AC-FT WQ Design Volume (Site)=0.100 AC-FT 4,368 Cu Ft Site WQVolume 0.10 AC-FT 4,368 Cu Ft 5-Year Detention UDFCD V2 Eq. SO-1 Vi = KiA UDFCD VZ Eq. SO-3 Ks, (0.771-2.65)/(1000) ks =0.067 5-Yr Detention Volume =0.222 AC-FT 5-Yr Detention Volume 5-Yr Detention Volume =9667.9 Cu Ft 0.22 AC-FT 9,668 Cu Ft 100-Year Detention I UDFCD V2 Eq. SO-1 Vi= KA UDFCD V2 Eq. SO-2 KMOO= (1.78I-.002I 2-3.56)/(900) kloo=0.156 100-Yr Detention Volume =0.520 AC-FT 100-Yr Detention Volume 100-Yr Detention Volume =22635.0 Cu Ft 0.52 AC-FT 22,635 Cu Ft WQ Capture Volume = 5-Yr Volume plus WQCV = 100-Yr Volume plus 1/2 WQCV = 0.10 AC-FT 0.32 AC-FT 0.57 AC-FT Storage - 12/8/2016 WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO CONFIGURE PUMPS TO BE RAISED AND LOWERED THROUGH THE SERVICE MANHOLE. 25.5 53.7 :\c== 9%300 SERVICE MANHOLE %/ | 51LWATER nGHT NEOPRENEGASKET ANDSTAINESS_ = 1- i j'E AERGENCY OVERFLOW STEEL BOLTS FP NP OUTLETC=====--- / RE: MEP PLANS 3'0 SERVICE MANHOLE W/ WATER " TIGHT NEOPRENE GASKET AND J 11STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS -======41 11 =====41 = 414=0 LONG SWEEP |CLEAD, ouT (TYP) -----1 1 C SLOTTED PVC PIPE TYP. 1= =k 57.2'- LORIRCE PLATE \ GRAVITY OUTFALL L[NV=5421.66 i , RE: MEP PLANS Jl - 11 4')(4" WYE (TYP)-, || ===41 C=====--------P-111' DRAIN SLOT TO r PREVENT ODOR &11/ BACTERIA ISSUES ENERGY REDUCING := CONCRETE CURB.SEE PLAN BELOW. ---,0. ----------- 90' BEND J Crm) 7 2.79 INFLOW PIPE_.1 | RE: MEP PLANS W 3301 3'0 SERVICE MANHOLE W/ WATER TIGHT NEOPRENEGASKET AND STAINLESS STEEL BOLTS 4*5'2 t--1 INF-LOW P\PE ./t 27 -„_-Z 22 RE: MEP PLANS WQCV WSE = 5427.61 WXV VOL REQUIRED - 4.358 OF WQCV VOL_ PROVIDED = 4,376 CF 3'0 SERVICE MANHOLE r-w/ WATER TIGHT- NEOPRENE GAS<ET AND STA!NLESS STEEL BOLTS r--1 1.5=MIN. CLASS C -3.0' -=EFILTER MATERIAL 6.·0'\ 1 | 5.68-L 11 3.15'===2=C=--*#<=--1-L 1 1 3'0 SERVICE MANHOLE 5-YR WSE = 5425.08 W/ WATER TIGHT NEOPRENE 5-YR VOL REQUIRED = 9,668 CF GASKET AND STAINLESSn 5-YR VOL PROVIDED = 9,676 0 STEEL BOLTS 5-YR RELEASE = 0.56 CFS 100-YR WSE = 5428.33 100-YR VOL REQUIRED = 22,635 CF r 100-YR VOL PROVIDED = 24,897 CF 1 100-YR RELEASE = 3.33 CFS 1 1-j _* .1.LFREEBOARD._._._.__1 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW J *2 7.67'\ NORTH 4- SLOTTED PVC PIPE (SEE SLOT REQUIREMENTS ON THIS SHEET) 8= MIN. GRAVEL MEETING L_21 CDOT SPECIFICAn ON 703 (GRADE # 3, 4 OR 67) GRAMTY OUTFALL /INV=5421.66-7 RE: MEP PLANS GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 0 2.5 5 1p ISSUED: 12/09/2016 Kimley»>Horn SA+R PARTNERS WAZEE DETENTION VAULT DETAIL 5,1EARSADYINSROCKMORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 12/8/2016 1:58:49 PM K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\CADD\Construction\Site Plan\096331009STORM_VAULT.dwg APPENDIX C - DRAINAGE PLAN WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT October 25, 2016 , WEST END 38 SITE PLAN A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY UNE B el :Tr---------2---------------------7-----PROPOSED DRAINAGE LEGEND 8882*7 ED4£ , 18TRP MALL 1 # = BASIN DESIGNATION AC = AREA IN ACRES Acll/1 = % IMPERVIOUSNESS/2\ 1| li\ # = DESIGN POINT ... 11 1 1 r-PROPERTY LINE /51 4 1 UPROPERTY UNE 1 1 1 1- /21>> 1»'17- 1 -CEh // / (0.54| 84% ) 111/t t 'ROPERT UNE J 2 \ 36% / t ,:f 1 1 ,/ 4 '11 ' -1 t : # ---= PROPOSED BASIN BOUNDARY --I PROPOSED FLOW ARROW -* EXISTING FLOW ARROW / - - THE BASIS OF BEARINGS BEARING8 SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID BEARING8 DERIVED FRON RTK FAeT STAnC GPS OBSERVATIONS AND ARE 8A8ED UPON THE COLORADO A COORDINATE SYBTEM OF 1983 CENTRAL ZONE (NAD 83, 2011), ALONG THE SOUTHERLY UNE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 3M SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST, 6™ PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, WHICH BEARS SOUTH.89 38'20 WEST, BETWEEN THE MONUMENTS 8HOWN HEREIN. al:·j U BENCHMARK:' CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE #PHAC1 1R::.5- .12%r : 1 : -4,"'Unimmwi.,mme'&RECOVERED A 0.5" ALUMINUM ROD IN THE LAWN OFF THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY HALL, 150' MORE OR LESS SOUTH OF W 29TH AVE AND 530' MORE OR LESS 1 \ 1 EAST OF WADSWORTH BLVD. 7 1 Q ELEVATION - 5471.62 (NAVO 88)11- J Li_„- i isr:72 SUMMARY RUNOFF TABLE DESIGN DRA! N AREA G (15 (1100: 9 POINT BASIN (AC (CFS)(CFS)ICFS) Basin El 0.54 1.32 1.86 4.19 1 I f I mi (1.74 | 33% ) U Basin E2 1.14 1.20 1.69 6.40 Basin EB 022 0.48 0.68 1.62 Basin E4 1.74 1.76 2.48 9734 f. . 1 ZROPERTY UNE24**»%44« 4-- 1 |i .. |||1 k k-L L __- p -=E=== PROPERTY UNEn @7,4027 GAB - A 1 pl i PROPERTY UNE 2 1/, /2 C.lutFi- If [CID M pt + 4 111 1 ' L._..27*- 00 0 0.22 76% \1 ------------------------- 1.-r a L PROPERTY LINE t W 38TH AVENUE \NORTH , \ 1 - i -2-2-Z-Z-I-Z-Z-Z-Zmz-L-3- - ri 1 4 lEA'- i lt_L nlj" € ··=ri·- .' ' 1 I GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 6,0 " il ISSUED: 12/09/2016 Kimley»>Horn SA+R WAZEE EXISTING DRAINAGE MAP PARTNERSSHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE WEST END 38 SITE PLAN 6 12/7/2016 8:19:26 AM K:\DEN_Civil\096331009_WestEnd38\CADD\Exhibits\Drainage„n.-A \/nir·,\ 9nl A 11 Al\r,AllinninPAINAPS #A e /mYI *1in AEENriimiGm!@!171=m,NmaDATA 15 WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I PRELIMNARY DRAINAGE REPORT December 9, 2016 11... 1,1/.1.... 11.01.1,1 a' 1-w.w-w.w-u.... W 43RD PL t3 D LU W 43RD AVE @AVE j THREE ACRE LN W 42ND AVE ST CT ZEPHYR fROW MAP SCALE 1"500' PANEL 0214F FIRM 0 'Btn IN=11 Il di )TH AVE 0 o II[ IW <C> 39TH AVE kia BAR ¥Hdn FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP JEFFERSON COUNTY, COLORADO AND INCORPORATED AREAS W 39TH AVE 11112 PANEL 214 OF 675 (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CONTAINS: COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIXCITY OF WHEAT RIDGE -EDGEWATER, CITY OF 080089 0214 F 085079 080087 0214 F LAKESIDE, TOWN OF 080311 0214 F %LAKEWOOD, CITY OF 085075 0214 F WHEAT RIDGE, CITY OF 085079 0214 F t3 W 37TH AVE I I D I 36TH AVE 62.4 lill'11111 YUKON VANCE 033H Notice to User: The Map Number shown below should be used when placing map orders: the Community Number shown above should be used on insurance applications for the subject community. MAP NUMBER 08059C0214F MAP REVISED FEEi57 FEBRUARY 5, 2014 Federal Emergency Management Agency 1 W 35TH PL W ATU C\ This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map. It was extracted using F-MIT On-Une. This map does not reflect changes or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at wm/.msc.fema.gov .-4 Soil Map-Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties 493140 493160 493180 493200 493220 493240 493260 493280 493300 493320 493340 493360 i 9 r:€ 0 4 3% R Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. 493140 493160 493180 493200 493220 493240 493260 493280 493300 493320 493340 493360 105° 4' 48 .I it oSOI 4402270 OZEZOI,17 OIZZOM7 06IZ0M, OLIZOM, 39° 46' 14" N - .39° 46' 14" N 39° 46' 9" N 39° 46'9" N N A Map Scale: 1:1,100 if printed on A landscape ( 11" x 8.5") sheet. Meters 0 15 30 60 90 ,Rxt 0 50 100 200 300 Map projecUon: Web Meretor Comer goordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources 10/24/2016Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map-Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines 11 Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features W Biowout ® Borrow Pit ¤ Clay Spot Closed Depression * Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill A Lava Flow 46 Marsh or swamp ® Mine or Quarry @ Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water V Rock Outcrop Saline Spot . Sandy Spot * Severely Eroded Spot * Sinkhole 2 Slide or Slip # Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Q Very Stony Spot * Wet Spot 8 Other Special Line Features Water Features - Streams and Canals Transportation H-+ Rails /0,0 Interstate Highways /V US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map:Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: http:#websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area:Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 22,2015 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) formapscales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 10,2014-Aug 21, 2014 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/24/2016 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 T- Soil Map-Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties Map Unit Legend Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties (CO641) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 105 Nunn-Urban land complex, 0 to 3.8 100.0% 2 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 3.8 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/24/2016 Wal Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 t Map Unit Description: Nunn-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes---Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties 105-Nunn-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol:jpkj Elevation:5,200 to 6,500 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches Frost-free period: 126 to 142 days Farm/and c/assification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Nunn and similar soils: 65 percent Urban /and. 20 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Nunn Setting Landform:Alluvial fans, mesas, terraces Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape: L\near Parent material: Clayey,calcareous alluvium Typical profile Hl - 0 to 6 inches: clay loam H2 - 6 to 30 inches. clay, clay loam H2 - 6 to 30 inches: day loam, loam H3 - 30 to 60 inches: H3 - 30 to 60 inches: Properties and qualities S/ope: 0 to 2 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Natural drainage class:Well drained Runoff class:High Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Calcium carbonate, maximum in profile: 15 percent Available water storage in profile: Very high (about 19.3 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): k Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: Clayey Foothill (R049BY208CO) Other vegetative classification:CLAYEY FOOTHILL (048AY208CO) 0DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/25/2016 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 2 A. Map Unit Description: Nunn-Urban land complex, 0 to 2 percent slopes---Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties Hydric soil rating: No Description of Urban Land Typical profile Hl - 0 to 6 inches:variable Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated):None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): Ss Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Golden Area, Colorado, Parts of Denver, Douglas, Jefferson, and Park Counties Survey Area Data: Version 10, Sep 22, 2015 0DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/25/2016 •i Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 2 I Vicinity Map r West End 38 . L r 11$ 4 0 L . 1 4 Project Area - y i €/IN -· 1 Lt AP.l9!liXISTING Sl•-MES WEST END 38 - WHEAT RIDGE I FINAL DRAINAGE REPORT 16 October 25, 2016 Pre-app h.. 4 City of3- - Wheat RidgeCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PRE-APPLICATION MEETING SUMMARY Meeting Date:August 25,2016 Applicant:Tyler Downs, Wazee Partners Chris Downs, Wazee Partners Dennis Sobieski, Kimley Horn Andy Rockmore, Shears Adkins Rockmore Aleks Kaplan, Shears Adkins Rockmore Jim Y., Vectra Bank Attending Staff:Lauren Mikulak. Senior Planner Lisa Ritchie, Planner H Zack Wallace, Planning Technician Steve Art, Economic Development Director/Urban Renewal Manager Mark Westberg, Projects Supervisor Specific Site Location:Northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street 7323 W. 38th Ave., 7391 W. 38th Ave., 3845 Upham St. Existing Zoning:Mixed-Use Commercial (MU-C) Existing Comp. Plan:Main Street Corridor Community Commercial Center Neighborhood Buffer Area Existing Site Conditions: The property is located at the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street. This property was part ofthe city-initiated rezoning ofthe Wadsworth Boulevard corridor in 2011 to Mixed-Use Commercial (MU-C). The adjacent properties to the north and west are also zoned MU-C. Properties to the east and south are zoned Mixed-Use Neighborhood (MU-N), part of the city-initiated rezoning ofthe 38th Avenue corridor in 2012 to MU-N. The surrounding land uses are a mix ofcommercial and retail services, and across Upham Street is Stevens Elementary School, part of the Jefferson County School District. Adjacent to the property to the west is Wheat Ridge Marketplace, home to a Safeway grocery store, in addition to several retail stores and fast food restaurants. There are also some residential uses scattered throughout the surrounding area. Large areas of residential development can be found north and south of the 38th Avenue corridor. The site currently appears to consist of four parcels according to the Jefferson County Assessor, only one of which is currently platted. The northern-most lot currently belongs to the E.S. Allen Subdivision. 1 1 Figure 1: Site Location Figure 2: Zoning Map / City el 1 City 01W heat Ridge W heatRidge Geographic Giographic Information Systems I Information Systems AN Subject properly Subject Property ..t Parcel Line; n¥Dimplayed Zone Districts Residential-Two (R-2) Re:Idential-Three (R-3) 6 'F EZE I Commercial-One (C-1) Restjcted Commercial (RC) Neighborhood-1 Commercial (NC) Neighborhood (MU-N) MIxed UN Commefelet (MU·C) I 38TH'AVE 38TH AVE 1 1 t lk. r T 1 -'f t I N N 4- 36TH PC 36TH PL 36TH AVE t 36TH AVE1.252€XSEEE 4 19 *VHd 10 HOIHTEULER,ST ft'·F N Jefferson County Assessor Records indicate the following: Parcel Address Owner Land Area Number Structure Type Year Built Subdivision 3845 Upham St. 7391 W. 38th Ave. 7323 W. 38tll Ave. Vacant Olive Street 39-234-00-088 Development Co LLC Wadsworth 39-234-00-086 Building Corporation Olive Street 39-234-00-089 Development Co LLC Olive Street 39-234-04-030 Development Co LLC 12,325 square feet 57,150 square feet 53,840 square feet 36,503 square feet Office 1960Warehouse 2-story office 1985 Vacant - Structure demolished in 2015 per City Demolition Permit Vacant Unplatted Unplatted Unplatted E.S. Allen Subdivision Applicant/Owner Preliminary Proposal: The applicant is proposing to redevelop the site into a 4-story mixed-use project featuring 160 apartments and approximately 13,800 square feet of retail space. The applicants propose to implement outdoor public plans and gathering spaces. The development will also include the construction of a new freestanding Vectra Bank Building oriented towards 38th Avenue between the proposed retail and existing Bradley gas station. This two- story building will include drive-thru ATM lanes. Will a neighborhood meeting need to be held prior to application submittal? No, a neighborhood meeting will not be required. Planning comments: The following items were discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Zoning & Use The current zoning is Mixed Use - Commercial, which is generally located along major commercial corridor and at community and employment activity centers. This zone district encourages medium to high density mixed use development. In addition to residential and civic uses, it allows for a wide range of commercial and retail uses. The applicant's proposal of a mix of retail space and apartments appears to be in line with the goals and objectives of the Mixed Use - Commercial zone district. As such, this proposal will require no change in zoning. Bank Drive-Thru The bank is proposed to include a drive-thru component. All drive-thru uses in mixed use zone districts are considered conditional uses, meaning they require additional review of the proposed use and site design to ensure that there will be minimal impact. In the MU-C zone district, a drive-through use is exempt from separation requirements if it is part of a mixed use development with an approved concept plan. In this case a concept plan will be used to provide preliminary approval of land use 3 drainage. and circulation concepts. At the time that the bank site plan is reviewed, a response to the conditional use permit (CUP) criteria should be submitted as well. Subdivision A subdivision process will be required in order to consolidate the existing parcels. Due to the current configuration of the site, Staff has requested that the plat document be submitted with at least two sheets, one listing all of the vacations, and another listing the new access points, easements, parcel lines, etc. Any easement vacation that occurs by separate document should be referenced on the plat. Development Standards High quality architecture is a vital component to creating a unique sense of place. Creative design that pays careful attention to the building's contribution to the public realm, through massing, form, materials, and its relationship to the street. is encouraged. Article IX of the Municipal Code (Mixed Use Zone Districts) provides standards for achieving quality architecture and site design. This includes, but is not limited to: human scale architecture, changes to faQade color/texture, plane depth variation, and an emphasis on the primary entrance. These standards also require ground floor transparency - at least 60% transparent for retail uses along the primary frontage, and 30% for retail facades facing streets or public spaces. Parking Requirements Automobile parking shall be provided at the following rates: Use Group A Minimum Required Parking Maximum Allowed Parking Residential 1 space per unit 2.5 spaces per unit Retail 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet 7 spaces per 1,000 square feet Restaurant 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet 12 spaces per 1,000 square feet Office 2 spaces per 1,000 square feet 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet A For other uses, please refer to Section 26-] 109 of the Wheat Ridge Municipal Code. Parking shall meet the requirements in Section 26-1107 which include but are not limited to: placing parking behind or to the side of buildings, buffering and screening surface parking that directly abuts a street or public space, and the surfacing, landscaping, lighting and space/aisle dimensions required by Section 26-501.E.5. through Section 26-501.E.7. and 26-501.E. 11. Handicapped parking should be provided at a minimum rate of 1 per every 25 required off-street parking spaces. it was noted that a shared parking agreement may be pursued with Steven's Elementary School, whose parking lot is adjacent to the subject property. The City has a shared parking agreement form which is required to be recorded with Jefferson County in order to establish shared parking between two properties. The agreement form will be sent as an attachment with these notes. Bicycle Parking Mixed Use zone districts also require bicycle parking. For non-residential development, or portion thereof, bicycle parking should be provided at a minimum rate of 1 per every 20 required automobile parking spaces, but no less than 4 spaces. For residential development, or portion thereof, bicycle parking should be provided at a minimum rate of 1 bicycle parking space for every 10 units, but no less than 3 spaces. 4 Bicycle parking shall be provided on site, no more than 50-feet from the primary building entrance. Landscaping and Open Space Mixed use developments in the MU-C zone district require a minimum of 10% open space coverage. Open spaces include planted areas as well as hardscaped areas, such as plazas. Green roofs may also count towards open space requirements. At least 75% of the required open space must be usable- refer to Section 26-1110.E for the features of usable open space. Utility Providers The City of Wheat Ridge is not a full-service city. The utility and service providers for this property include: • West Metro Fire Protection District, phone: 303-989-4307 • Wheat Ridge Water District, phone: 303-424-2844 • Wheat Ridge Sanitation District, phone: 303-424-7252 Ailland use applications will be sent out on referral to these agencies for comment; however, staff encourages potential applicants to contact service districts ahead oftime. This may help to understand any design or infrastructure requirements and potential costs associated with the proposed project. Parkland Dedication Parkland dedication is required by the Municipal Code based on the presumption that new residents create additional demands for and burdens on park, trail, open space, and recreation facilities. Where dedication is not possible or feasible, fees-in-lieu of dedication are acceptable. The proposal does not include any dedication of parkland, and as such, a parkland dedication fee of $2.021.62 is required for each new dwelling unit created. Because this fee is being assessed for the apartment building, this fee is collected when the building permit is issued. Building Division comments: New construction will require building permits, and the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy upon completion of the project, and only after passing all ofthe required inspections. The City has adopted and currently enforces the 2012 Edition of the International Codes and the 2014 Edition of the National Electric Code. The City uses the ANSI 1 17.1-2009 Standard in determining requirements related to accessibility. Public Works comments: The following items were discussed based on the applicant's proposal: Drainage Site drainage requirements are based on the area of disturbance created by the new development. Any drainage ponds on the site will be required to be located in their own tract. More information on drainage requirements can be found in the attached notes and on the CitY's Civil Engineering Resources webpage. A final drainage report is required, signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Colorado. On-Street Parking The City of Wheat Ridge may be striping parallel parking spaces along 38th Avenue between Upham Street and High Court if an overlay project is completed in 2017. Additional parallel parking along 38th Avenue adjacent to the subject property is supported. but will require a bulb out at the northwest corner of 38th Avenue and Upham Street. The applicant inquired about back-in parking along Upham Street. The City is supportive ofthis proposal, but parallel parking may be better utilized. On-street parking would require some right-of- way dedication. In the section below, no specific right-of-way dedication widths have been provided due to the flexibility ofthe project, such as back-in parking vs. parallel parking. Please contact Dave Brossman at 303-235-2864 to resolve the dedications required as you formalize your site plan. Right-of-way Dedication Right-of-way dedications will be required along 38th Avenue and Upham Street in order to provide adequate room for roadway improvements meeting current city standards. Please also see the attachment for additional information provided by the Public Works Department. Review Process This request will require a Concept Plan, Conditional Use Permit, Subdivision, and Site Plan. Concept Plan Concept Plan reviews occur for phased projects to ensure that despite being developed in a phased manner the entirety of the site has been contemplated and planned for. in this case the concept plan will allow preliminary approval of land use and circulation concepts. It will also allow the drive-through (bank) use. The first step in the concept plan process is a pre- application meeting. Once the pre-application meeting is held a formal application may be submitted. Applications must be submitted by appointment with a planner. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. Upon submittal of a complete application, you will be assigned a case manager, who will be your point of contact at the City through the duration of your concept plan process. The case manager will review the application, send it out on referral to outside service agencies (Xcel Energy. water district, fire district, etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Economic Development, etc.) for review. The referral period is 15 days, during which time the referral agencies and departments may submit comments on the application. These comments, as well as those from the case manager, will be forwarded to the applicant. Modifications to the subdivision plat may be required as a result ofthese comments. The applicant must address comments and resubmit relevant documents. Once all comments and requirements have been met, the case manager will refer the concept plan to the Community Development Director. The concept plan review is administrative, which means no public hearings are required and the Community Development Director will give final approval. Once the Concept Plan is approved any proposed development will require an approved Site Plan and building permit. Conditional Use Permit A conditional use permit is required for the drive-thru ATM use on the future Vectra Bank Site. A formal application may be submitted at any point after the pre-application meeting. The 6 CUP application will be assigned a case number and case manager. The case manager will be the applicant's point of contact at the City for the duration of the case processing. The case manager will review the case, and sent it out on referral to City and outside agencies for review. The referral period is 15 days, during which time all departments and agencies may submit comments on the application. These comments, as well as those from the case manager, may require modifications to the application. The case manager will prepare a staff report for review by the Community Development Director, who will approve, approve with conditions, or deny the Conditional Use Permit. The Director will evaluate the application based on the following criteria, which have been established by the Municipal Code: 1. The compatibility of the proposed use with the Comprehensive Plan; 2. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing and proposed adjacent uses, in terms of scale, site design, and operating characteristics (including traffic generation, lighting, noise, and hours of operation); 3. The ability to mitigate adverse and undesirable impacts to the surrounding area, including but not limited to visual impacts, air emissions, noise, vibrations, glare, heat, odors, water pollution, and other nuisance effects; 4. Amount of traffic generated and capacity and design of roadways to handle anticipated traffic; 5. The incorporation and integration of architectural and landscape features to mitigate impacts from the proposed use. A decision of denial by the Community Development Director can be appealed by the applicant to the Board of Adjustment. Public hearings before the Board of Adjustment are subject to an additional processing and public notification fee. Please note: A Certificate of Occupancy for development of the conditional use must be issued within three years of the date of approval ofthe CUP, or the CUP will expire. The approval of a Conditional Use Permit is only one step in the process; additional requirements may need to be addressed from other agencies and departments. This includes the Building Division's permitting and inspection requirements. Subdivision The first step in the subdivision process is a pre-application meeting. After the pre-application meeting is complete, a formal application may be submitted. Applications must be submitted by appointment with a planner. Incomplete applications will not be accepted. A subdivision consisting of 5 or more lots or parcels is considered a major subdivision. A major subdivision requires two public hearings, one in front of Planning Commission, and one in front of City Council. Upon submittal of a complete application, the case manager will review the application, send it out on referral to outside service agencies (Xcel Energy, water district, fire district, etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Economic Development, etc.) for review. The referral period is 15 days, during which time the referral agencies and departments may submit comments on the application. These comments, as well as those from the case manager, will be 7 forwarded to the applicant. Modifications to the subdivision plat may be required as a result of these comments. The applicant must address comments and resubmit relevant documents. This process may need to occur several times. Once all comments have been addressed to the case manager's satisfaction, a public hearing before Planning Commission will be scheduled. Planning Commission will make a recommendation of approval, approval with conditions, or denial. This recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for final action. Each public hearing requires a mandated posting period, during which time the property will be posted with a sign, notice will be posted in the Wheat Ridge Transcript, and letters will be sent out to all property owners within 300 feet of the property. Once approved, a blackline mylar copy of the plat must be submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge in order to be recorded with Jefferson County Clerk and Recorder. The plat must be approved and recorded prior to the issuance of any building permits. Site Plan Review The first step in the Site Plan Review process is the pre-application meeting. Because the August 25 pre-app meeting reviewed very conceptual plans, it may be necessary or desirable to schedule a pre-application meeting in the future to discuss the details of the site plan submittals. including open space and architectural concepts. After the pre-application meeting, a formal application may be submitted. Application must be submitted by appointment with a planner, and will not be accepted if they are incomplete. Upon submittal, a case manager will be assigned to handle the application, and will be the applicant's point of contact at the City for the duration ofthe site plan review process. The case manager will review the application, and once all submittal requirements are met, the application will be sent out on referral to outside service agencies (Xcel Energy, water district, fire district, etc.) and other City agencies (Public Works, Economic Development, etc.) for review. The referral period is 15 days, during which time the referral agencies and departments may submit comments on the application. These comments, as well as those from the case manager, will be forwarded to the applicant. Modifications to the site plan may be requires as a result of these comments. When all comments are addressed to the satisfaction of the case manager, the application will be forwarded to the Community Development director for final decision. The Site Plan review process is administrative, which means there are no public hearings before City Council or Planning Division. Please note: Approval of the Site Plan application does not mean that a building permit has been issued. Once site plan approval is attained, the applicant may submit a building permit application with the Building Division. Attachments: Public Works Comments, Concept Plan checklist, Conditional Use Permit checklist, Subdivision checklist, Site Plan checklist. Note: Please be aware that the above comments are for general information purposes only. Staff cannot predict the outcome of any land use development application. A favorable response from staff does not obligate any decision-making body (Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Planning Commission and/or City Council) to a desired outcome. Staff will provide the best advice available given existing regulations, current policy, political climate and information submitted. Phone Numbers Meredith Reckert - Senior Planner Lauren Mikulak - Senior Planner Lisa Ritchie - Planner H Zack Wallace - Planning Technician Michael Arellano - Chief Building Official Dave Brossman - Development Review Engineer Mark Westberg - Projects Supervisor 303-235-2848 303-235-2845 303-235-2852 303-235-2849 303-235-2853 303-235-2864 303-235-2863 9 Minimum City Street Standards Upham at 38th Avenue With on-street parking 54' ROW N 2· 5 6' 2.5' 6'11' Side-Parking Lane walk 11'6' 2.5' 6' Lane Parking Side- walk 2' 1' 26' Fire Clear Zone ) Cross-Section L2P: 2-Lane Local Street with Parking / Shared Lane Without on-street parking Where no on-street parking exists (between bays or at 38th), a buffer/amenity zone can be hardscaped with tree grates or be landscaped. On the east side of Upham, a bulb out is needed to define the start and end of on-street parking areas. 51' ROW 6' 6' 2.5' 11' 11' 2.5' 6'6' Bulb out 1 3{ li ji IC 34 )4 ) Side-Buffer/Lane Lane Side- walk Amenities walk 1 26' Fire Clear Zone 1 Cross-Section L2: 2-Lane Local City of Refer to Streetscape Design Manual for standards related toPH WheatRidge streetscape (eg materials, tree, light spacing, etc) 14 1 *4 = 1 M- 921*fr'. .*i ___ __4. -.14-1. I . approved along Upham, T_ Back-out parking could not be however, staff would support IVparallel parking instead. In 21 1 13 , 7,8/87/ 0 .8 INaddition, because the asphalt MI# 1 01 9 1, 1,14,10'ill". 0 .'PW agrees that ,. Y.access from this parking lot to the 1easement would behlhelpful '11 PW agrees this is a Icritical access point.g- 1- 1 3 . / 464. appears to bewide enough, parallel parking could be added to the east side of the street as well. Curb/gutter and a 6' < attached sidewalk (minimum)would need to be added to the west side of the street--this with the parking would require a 9'ROW dedication. See attached section for Upham. 11 i 11 1It L /111 !11!*Wi :*• T ......„ -. Bulb outs would need to be added to formalize the start of the parallel parking on both sides of the street. -I '. 3 4 E. r ill pl - i -:I.'w'/p.. i, •=T·rr·rmt[/1,4.*.*.8.4- _1 . - Could parallel parking be f : ---i- - 1,<414...1... added on the north side of this drive for Vectra? 1" = 100' '.4-11# irrill'll,"IMI"" 1 1 --C If this is reconfigured to allow additional stacking, it may be possible to simply stripe those additional lanes without a need to extend the length of the median. The median currently only serves to prevent left-in movements into the Chase Bank property. The width of the inbound lane may be oversized to accomodate fuel trucks so consider that turning movement also if/when proposing any modification here. SA+R SHEARB ADKINS ROCKMDRE If a right-out here is needed, itcould be permitted if it is designed appropriately (narrow) Parallel parking on 38th is acceptable in these locations. The parking and streetscape would be dedicated as public right-of-way. It would not have an impact on street width designation. 38th & Upham SITE PLAN 5Wheat Ridge, Colorado Garage Entrance 2 * A p 6 , 11 W 38th Ave. Garage Enti 4 W 38th Ave.NAL 7- \s Ck. ...................alConnection to AdditionalParking (School Lot)1 Project Data £[22£21 Parking Retail:5,100 SF Garage:284 Bank:5,000 SF Surface: 36 Library:13,000 SF Bank Pad: 6 Residential: 141,700 SF Required:268 Garage:98,200 SF Total:320 Spaces Total:263,000 SF SA+R 38th & Upham 3PROPOSALWheat Ridge, Colorado SHEARS ADKINS ROCKMORE Y %3> Parkina Garage Area:98,200 SF Parking:74 (Ivl 3) 110 (Ivl 2) 100 (lvl 1)Public/Private 284 (total) Amenity Space Residential Area:141,700 SF (3 levels) Units:150 Avg. Unit Size: 800 SF Req'd Parking: 200 sp (1.3/unit)11 4 Sidewalk Easement (Match Longmont Apt's) LEVEL 3/4 \24'98 Bank Pad Parkina VA Area:2,300 SF Parking: 6 sp Bank Area:2,500 SF (per Ivl) 5,000 SF (total) Req'd Parking: 17 sp 7 Librarv Area:9,000 SF (Ivl 2) 4,000 SF (Ivl 1) 13,000 SF (Total) Req'd Parking: 30 sp LEVEL 2 Surface Parking Area:10,500 SF Parking:36 sp 47 AA -- < Private Courtyard & Amenity Space Residential Lobby Pedestrian Walkway (Arcade) Retail Area:5,100 SF Req'd Parking: 21 sp (4/1000 sf) LEVEL 1 SA+R Sli EARS ADKINSROCKMORE 38th & Upham Wheat Ridge, Colorado CONCEPT BREAKDOWN 4 .