HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Packet 03/08/2010
6:30 p.m. Pre-Meeting CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO 7500 WEST 29TH AVENUE, MUNICIPAL BUILDING March 8, 2010 7:00 p.m. Individuals with disabilities are encouraged
to participate in all public meetings sponsored by the City of Wheat Ridge. Call Heather Geyer, Public Information Officer, at 303-235-2826 at least one week in advance of a meeting
if you are interested in participating and need inclusion assistance. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL OF MEMBERS APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF February 22. 2010 PROCLAMATIONS AND
CEREMONIES Randy Ketelson -Citizen Award Proclamation -National Multiple Sclerosis Awareness Week March 8-12, 2010 Proclamation -Livestrong Day at W~eat Ridge Cyclery March 27, 2010
CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK a. Citizens, who wish, may speak on any matter not on the Agenda for a maximum of 3 Minutes and sign the Public Comment Roster. b. Citizens who wish to speak
on Agenda Items, please sign the GENERAL AGENDA ROSTER or appropriate PUBLIC HEARING ROSTER before the item is called to be heard. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: March 8, 2010 Page -2-PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 1. Council Bill 02-2010 amending a Planned Industrial Development Outline Development Plan
to allow an additional use on property located at approxim t"'ly 5250 Oak Street. (Case No. WZ-09-09/Skyline Estates Filing 3/Arvada Fire Protection District) 2. Council Bill 03-2010
-An Ordinance extending the Moratorium enacted by Seeton 2 of Ordinance 1453, Series 2009, on the submission, acceptance, processing, ar ::! approval of any application for a City of
Wheat Ridge Permit or License relate'i 10 the operation of a business or cooperative that sells or cultivates Medical Marijuana pursuant to the Authority granted by Article XVIII , Section
14, of the Colorado Constitution. DECISIONS. RESOLUTIONS. AND MOTIONS 3. Resolution 14-2010 -authorizing the renaming of the Wheat Ridge Senior/Community Center to the Wheat Ridge Active
Adult Center. 4. Ratification of Mayoral appointment to Wheat Ridge Foundation. 5. Motion to approve a $40,000 contribution to the Wheat Ridge Business DistriL' f0r the purpose of funding
the Revitalization Incentive Grant Program. 6. Motion to cancel the Wheat Ridge City Council Meeting of March 22, 2010. CITY MANAGER'S MATTERS CITY ATTORNEY'S MATTERS ELECTED OFFICIALS'
MATTERS ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO February 22,2010 Mayor DiTullio called the Regular City Council Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Council Members present: Karen Adams, Karen Berry, Joseph
DeMott, Joyce Jay, Tracy Langworthy, Davis Reinhart, Wanda Sang, and Mike Stites. Also present: City Clerk, Michael Snow; City Manager, Randy Young; Deputy City Manager, Patrick Goff;
City Attorney, Gerald Dahl; City Treasurer, Larry Schulz; Police Director of Community Development, Kenneth Johnstone; Director of Public Works, Tim Paranto; Assistant to the City Manager,
Heather Geyer; staff; and interested citizens. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF February 8,2010 Motion by Mr. Stites to approve the Minutes of February 8, 2010; seconded by Mrs. Langworthy; carried
8-0. CITIZENS' RIGHT TO SPEAK Kyle Walpole announced he has requested the Jefferson County District Attorney's office conduct an investigation into what he believes is gross misconduct
by the Wheat Ridge Police Department. Gene Shirley asserts that this Council is not acting responsibly with taxpayers' money and is concerned for the City's budget. He doesn't approve
of Council Members going to Washington, DC every year and aske,d Council Members directly if they are going to the National League of Cities Conference this year. He requested Council
remove the budget item for these expenses completely. Jan Hopkins, of Colorado Stepping out For Kids, spoke of the organization's services to provide clothing supplies for needy children
in the Wheat Ridge Area. They will prov;de 50 children in Wheat Ridge with vital clothing supplies this year. She thanked the Council for the generous support provided to the organization
this year as they continue to provide these services in the City. 1. CONSENT AGENDA A. Motion to approve Award of ITB-10-06 2010, Crack Seal Project, to Coatings, Inc., Arvada, Colorado,
in the amount of $81 ,051 with a 10% contingency of $8,105 for a total contract award of $89,156. B. Motion approving Murray Dahl Kuechenmeister & Renaud LLP January 31,2010 Invoices
for Attorney Services in the amount of $16,401 .17. C. Motion to approve payment to Denver Regional Council of Governments in the amount of $18,720 from Acct. No. 01-122-700-704 for
2010 Contract Elevator/Escalator Inspections.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: February 22, 2010 Page -2-D. Resolution 11-2010 -amending the Fiscal Year 2010 General Fund Budget to reflect the approval of a supplemental budget appropriation
for additional Contract Building Inspections related to damage from the July 20, 2009 storm to Code Consultants International in the amount of $20,000. Consent Agenda was introduced
and read by Mrs. Langworthy. Motion by Mrs. Langworthy for approval of the Consent Agenda; seconded by Mr. Stites; carried 8-0. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ORDINANCES ON SECOND READING 2. Resolution
13-2010 -considering a Special Use Permit to allow a Day Care for up to 60 children as an ancillary use to a church in a Residential-One (R-1) Zone District. (SUP-09-03 -Wellspring Bible
Church) Mayor DiTullio opened the public hearing . Resolution 13-2010 was introduced by Mr. Reinhart. Ken Johnstone presented the staff report (PowerPoint amended to this packet). Steve
Gay, pastor of the Wellspring Bible Church, spoke to the church's desire to provide cost-effective care at a discount cost. The previous childcare program provided care to homeless families,
which, admittedly, was detrimental to the community. This kind of impact will be minimal with this new program. He believes bringing these services to the neighborhood will positively
affect home values by providing a service that is badly needed today and more-so as more new families move to the area. Mr. Gay shared their plan to mitigate all the potential impacts
to the neighborhood, including traffic patterns, parking, noise, and vandalism. Kelly Hagen is director of the Child Care services program being proposed. She believes many child-care
facilities have shut down, further inconveniencing families needing these services. Many families will not be able to obtain community funded childcare services due to public funding
cut-backs. By offering lower child/teacher ratios than is the standard in the industry many new families moving to Wheat Ridge will benefit from quality child care through this program.
Jane Jones owns property adjacent to the church property and opposes this proposal because of the potential traffic and noise impacts. Michael Cory also lives near the church and opposes
this proposed use because the level of traffic it will create is not conducive to a quality environment in the neighborhood. Erica Harvey opposes the childcare facility because of the
potential parking , traffic, noise and crime impacts. Kevin Bryan lives next door to the church. He has concerns in that the group that occupied the building previously caused some roof
damages that were never fixed . When the previous
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: February 22, 2010 Page -3-day-care was there, the kids would climb over the fence from the church property into his, where he has a dog. He is concerned that there
may be liability issues to him. He also has concerns for the traffic levels -on Sunday speeding cars visiting the church are already a problem. Nat Hagerman believes there may have been
dumping of toxic chemicals by previous users of adjacent properties. He believes that, for the sake of public safety, the property should be inspected before being used for children
. Mayor DiTullio closed the public hearing. Motion by Mr. Reinhart to approve case number SUP-09-03, a special use permit application requesting approval of a daycare center, approving
that daycare center for up to 30 children, thereby satisfying three of the seven objections specified in the Staff report; seconded by Ms. Berry; failed 3-5 with Council Members Berry,
Adams and Reinhart voting Yes. Motion by Mrs. Sang to adopt Resolution 13-2010, Case No. SUP-09-03, denying a Special Use Permit application, for the following reasons: 1. The applicant
is requesting a child care facility that is not associated or ancillary to the church use. 2. Stand alone daycare centers in any residential zone district are prohibited by City Code.
3. The special use may create adverse impacts greater than allowed under existing zoning for the property. 4. There could be a significant impact to adjacent property owners. 5. The
request may negatively impact the character and residential nature of the neighborhood . 6. The request compromises the safety and convenience of the people in the area already using
the adjacent streets due'to an increase of vehicle trips per day on local streets. 7. The request will increase the intensity of the use on the property as the church currently is unused
during the day. 8. There were objections regarding the request during the 10-day posting period ; Seconded by Mr. Stites; carried 5-3 with Council Members Berry, Adams and Reinhart voting
No. ORDINANCES ON FIRST READING 3. Council Bill 03-2010 -An Ordinance extending the Moratorium enacted by Section 2 of Ordinance 1453, Series 2009, on the submission, acceptance, processing,
and approval of any application for a City of Wheat Ridge Permit or License related to the operation of a business or cooperative that sells or cultivates Medical Marijuana pursuant
to the Authority granted by Article XVIII , Section 14, of the Colorado Constitution. Council Bill 03-2010 was introduced on first reading by Mrs. Jay. Motion by Mrs. Jay to approve
Council Bill 03-2010 on first reading , order it published, public hearing set for Monday, March 8, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, and that it take effect upon adoption;
seconded by Mrs. Sang; carried 7-1 with Mr. DeMott voting No.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: February 22, 2010 Page -4-DECISIONS, RESOLUTIONS, AND MOTIONS 4. Resolution 12-2010 -concerning expenditure of the City's 2007, 2008, 2009, and 2010 Jurisdictional
Allocation of Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG), and acceptance of and authorization to expend 2008 Jefferson County CDBG Economic Development Funds. Resolution
12-2010 was introduced by Mr. Stites. Motion by Mr. Stites to approve Resolution 12-2010; seconded by Mrs. Sang; Bob Timm of the Senior Resource Center spoke to the services afforded
to Wheat Ridge residents through supportive donations such as what is provided by the City. He emphasized the impact of transportation needs for older residents and the importance to
continue providing these services so residents may reach their shopping and medical transportation needs. Motion carried 8-0. 5. Motion to approve appointments to various Boards and
Commissions. DISTRICT I Motion by Ms. Berry to appoint: Joelle Hedden to the Animal Welfare & Control Commission, term ending 3/2/13. Betty Jo Page to the Board of Adjustment, term ending
3/2/13. Jesse Hill to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending 3/2/13. Joseph Jesik to the Parks & Recreation Commission, term ending 3/2/13. Alan Bucknam to the Planning Commission,
term ending 3/2/13. Robert Alldredge to the Liquor Licensing Authority, term ending 3/2/13. Seconded by Mr. Reinhart; carried 8-0. DISTRICT II Motion by Mrs. Jay to appoint: Ryan Fisher
to the Board of Adjustment, term ending 3/2/13. Phillip Plummer to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending 3/2/13. Dean Gokey to the Planning Commission, term ending 3/2/13. Frank
Sanzalone to the Liquor Licensing Authority, term ending 3/2/13.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: February 22, 2010 Page -5-Chad Harrto the Cultural Commission, term ending 3/2/12 Milly Nadler to the Cultural Commission, term ending 3/2/11 . Seconded by Mrs.
Sang; carried 8-0. DISTRICT I I I Motion by Mrs. Adams to appoint: Ralph Santangelo to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending 3/2/13. Richard Matthews to the Planning Commission,
term ending 3/2/13. George Pond to the Planning Commission, term ending 3/2/12. John Miks to the Liquor Licensing Authority, term ending 3/2/13. Loretta DiTirro to the Cultural Commission
, term ending 3/2/11. Seconded by Mr. Stites; carried 8-0. DISTRICT IV Motion by Mrs. Langworthy to appoint: Robert Hance to the Animal Welfare 8. Control Commission , term ending 3/2/13.
Anthony Davia to the Liquor Authority, term ending 3/2/13. Larry Brewer to the Building Code Advisory Board, term ending 3/2/11 . Seconded by Mr. DeMott; carried 8-0. 6. Ratification
of the Mayoral Appointments to the Wheat Ridge Foundation. Motion by Mr. DeMott to ratify the Mayoral re-appointments of Curtis Gilmore, Tom Ripp and David Petersen to the Wheat Ridge
Foundation; terms to expire March 2, 2013; seconded by Mr. Reinhart; carried 8-0. 7. Ratification of the Mayoral Appointments to the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority. Motion by Mr. DeMott
to ratify the Mayoral re-appointment of Janice Thompson to the Wheat Ridge Housing Authority representing District IV; term to expire March 2, 2015; seconded by Mr. Reinhart; carried
8-0.
CITY COUNCIL MINUTES: February 22, 2010 Page -6-ELECTED OFFICIALS' MATTERS Mrs. Jay announced she is paying her own way to attend the National League of Cities conference for the City
of Wheat Ridge. Motion by Mr. Reinhart to postpone the March 15, 2010 Study Session to March 29, 2010; seconded by Mrs. Adams; carried 5-3 with Council Members DeMott, Stites and Sang
voting No. Mr. Stites will not be attending the NLC conference. Ms. Berry will be attending the NLC conference this year to converse with legislators and lobby for funding of local Wheat
Ridge projects. Wheat Ridge received no funding in the ARRA stimulus plan and is not eligible unless the City lobbies congress directly for this support. Meeting adjourned at 8:42p.m.
Michael Snow, City Clerk APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ON MARCH 8, 2010 BY A VOTE OF to Davis Reinhart, Mayor pro tem The preceding Minutes were prepared according to §47 of Robert's Rules
of Order, i.e. they contain a record of what was done at the meeting, not what was said by the members. Recordings and DVD's of tile meetings are available for listening or viewing in
the City Clerk's Office, as well as copies of Ordinances and Resolutions.
, . , .' r City of , Wheat RLdge ITEM NO: _1_1 DATE: March 8, 2010 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 02-2010 -AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 5250 OAK STREET (CASE NO. WZ-09-09/ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT) ~ PUBLIC HEARING D BIDS/MOTIONS
D RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: ISSUE: D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING (02/08/2010) ~ ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (03/08/2010) ~ YES D NO The applicant is requesting approval of an amendment
to a Planned Industrial Development (pro) Outline Development Plan (ODP) for property located at approximately 5250 Oak Street to allow an additional use of the property. The proposed
additional use is a public fire station. This case is being processed with a "non-specific" ODP which establishes permitted land uses and development standards. A future "specific" ODP
will be required with additional public hearings in front of Planning Commission and City Council. The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request at a public hearing held
on January 21, 2010. PRIOR ACTION: The property in question was part of a 17.67 acre tract which was rezoned from Agriculture-One (A-I) to Planned Residential Development (PRD) and Planned
Industrial Development (pro) in 2003 as Skyline Estates, Filing 3. A subsequent subdivision plat for the entire development and WZ-09-09/A FPD
Council Action Form March 8, 20 I 0 Page 2 a Final Development Plan (FOP) for the residential portion was approved in 2004. The portion zoned PID (subject parcel) is currently vacant,
while the residential portion of the development is built-out. Planning Commission reviewed the application to amend the Industrial-zoned ODP at a public hearing held on January 21 ,
2010 and gave a recommendation of approval for the following reasons: I. The proposed use will have less of an impact than existing uses allowed on the property. 2. The proposed use
will provide a buffer and land use transition from the industrial uses on the south side of Ridge Road to the residential neighborhood to the north. 3. The evaluation criteria supports
approval of the request. With the following conditions: I. A preliminary drainage report will be submitted at the time of specific ODP 2. A traffic analysis will be submitted at the
time of specific ODP FINANCIAL IMP ACT: One-time fees for the zone change were submitted with the application. A future application for a specific ODP will require a new application
and processing fees. BACKGROUND: The property in question is zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) having been rezoned from A-I , Agriculture-One, in 2003. Of the total 17.67 acres
of Skyline Estates Filing 3, the northern 14.49 acres were rezoned to Planned Residential Development (PRO), with the southern 2.79 acres zoned PID (subject property). An ODP plan was
approved which set allowable uses and general development parameters for the two different zonings within the development. The property was subsequently subdivided into 38 parcels with
the northern 37 being developed into a single family residential neighborhood. All public improvements associated with the development, including the installation of curb, gutter and
sidewalk and detention/drainage facilities, were constructed with the residential portion. While permitted uses and design parameters were established for the PID zoned lot, no development
of the property occurred and it remains vacant. The list of permitted uses on the ODP document closely mirrors the City's Commercial-One zone district. Some of the potentially incompatible
uses (auto repair, auto sales, RV sales, etc.) were eliminated from the list. Industrial uses allowed included greenhouses, office/warehouse, screened outside storage and minor assembly
and manufacturing. The development standards included 20% landscaped coverage, 40% maximum building coverage and a 35' height limitation. The remainder of the standards for lighting,
parking and signage refer
Council Action Form March 8, 2010 Page 3 back to the zoning and development code. Access is restricted to Oak Street. None of these standards are being modified by this application.
It is the intent of this application to amend only the existing permitted uses to allow a public fire station. The Arvada Fire Protection District has the property under contract for
purchase pending approval of this application. A conceptual site plan is provided in the plan set. All approved development standards appear to be met by this conceptual plan, including
setbacks, landscaped coverage, building coverage and height. The application has been through a standard City and outside agency referral process. No issues of concern have been raised.
The Planning Commission staff report and minutes have been attached for additional background on this application. At the Planning Commission public hearing there was discussion about
the project allowing access to Ridge Road, rather than Oak as designed and represented on Exhibit 5 of the Planning Commission report. Staff supports the access to Oak as it is undesirable
from a traffic management perspective to have access directly onto a collector street such as Ridge Road. Also, the cost for construction of a culvert crossing the Columbine Basin drainage
channel to access Ridge would be considerable. The fire district is satisfied with the access onto Oak Street. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff has concluded that the proposed modification to
the original uses specified on the Skyline Estates Filing 3 ODP must be processed as a zone change. Staff has further concluded that the criteria used to evaluate a zone change request
support approval of this application. I Staff is giving a recommendation of approval for the following reasons: • There have been changes to the area due to the construction of the three
filings of the Skyline Estates residential community. • The application is consistent with several of the identified goals in the Comprehensive Plan. • The use will have less of an impact
than than what could be built on the property under the existing zoning conditions. • All infrastructure is already in place. • There will be a positive impact on the health, safety
and welfare of residences and businesses in the area due to better emergency response times and proximity ofthe new station. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve Council Bill No. 02-2010,
Case No. WZ-09-09, a request for approval of an amendment to a Planned Industrial Development Outline Development Plan to allow the additional use of a public fire station on property
located at approximately 5250 Oak Street, on second reading, and that it take effect 15 days after publication for the following reasons: I. The proposed use will have less of an impact
than existing uses allowed on the property. 2. The proposed use will provide a buffer and land use transition from the industrial uses on the south side of Ridge Road to the residential
neighborhood to the north.
Council Action Form March 8, 2010 Page 4 3. The evaluation criteria supports approval of the request. With the following conditions: \. A preliminary drainage report will be submitted
at the time of specific ODP. 2. A traffic analysis will be submitted at the time of specific ODP." Or, "I move to deny Council Bill No. 02-2010, a request for approval of an amendment
to a Planned Industrial Development Outline Development for the following reason(s) " REPORT PREPARED & REVIEWED BY: Meredith Reckert, Senior Planner Kenneth Johnstone, Community Development
Director ATTACHMENTS: \. Council Bill No. 02-20 I 0 2. Planning Commission minutes 3. Planning Commission staff report, including the following Exhibits: \. Applicant's letter of request
2. Aerial photo 3. Skyline Estates Filing NO. 3 plat 4. Skyline Estates Filing Np. 3 Outline Development Plan (3 pages) 5. Proposed Outline Development Plan for new fire station 6. Comp
Plan Transportation Structure Plan 7. Comp Plan Structure Plan 8. Applicant's explanation of site selection for new station 9. Neighborhood Meeting Recap 10. Neighborhood Meeting sign-up
sheet
TITLE: INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER LANGWORTHY Council Bill No. 02 Ordinance No. --::.."..."...,..,. _ _ Series of 2010 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING A PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT OUTLINE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL USE ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT APPROXIMATELY 5250 OAK STREET (CASE NO. WZ-09-09/SKYLINE ESTATES FILING 3/ARVADA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT) BE IT ORDAINED
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO THAT: Section 1. Upon application by Arvada Fire Protection District, approval of an amendment to a Planned Industrial Development
Outline Development Plan to allow the additional use of a fire station on property located at approximately 5250 Oak Street and pursuant to the findings made based on testimony and evidence
presented at a public hearing before the Wheat Ridge City Council, an amendment to a Planned Industrial Development Outline Development Plan is approved for the following described land:
Lot 1, Block 4, Skyline Estates 3, City of Wheat Ridge, County of Jefferson, State of of Colorado. Section 2. Vested Property Rights. Approval of this amendment to a Planned Industrial
Development Outline Development Plan does not create a vested property right. Vested property rights may only arise and accrue pursuant to the provisions of Section 26-121 of the Code
of Laws of the City of Wheat Ridge. Section 3. Safety Clause. The City of Wheat Ridge hereby finds, determines, and dec/ares that this ordinance is promulgated under the general police
power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this ordinance is necessary for the preservation of health and safety
and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the ordinance bears a rational relation to the proper legislative object sought to
be attained. Section 4. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, or part of this Zoning Code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall for any reason be
adjusted by a court of competent jurisdiction invalid, such judgment shall not affect application to other persons or circumstances. Section 5. Supersession Clause. If any provision,
requirements or standard established by this Ordinance is found to conflict with similar provisions, requirements or standards found elsewhere in the Code of Laws of the City of Wheat
Ridge, which are in ATTACHMENT 1
existence as of the date of adoption of this Ordinance, the provisions, requirements and standards here shall supersede and prevail. Section 6. This Ordinance shall take effect 15 days
after final publication. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of -.JL to ~ on this 8th day of February, 2010, published by title in a newspaper and in full on the
City of Wheat Ridge website and consideration on final passa~e set for March 8, 2010, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29t Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado. READ,
ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this 8th day of March, 2010. SIGNED by the Mayor on this ___ day of ________ , 2010. Jerry DiTullio, Mayor
ATTEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk Approved as to form by City Attorney Gerald Dahl, City Attorney 1 st publication: February 11, 2010 2nd publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective
Date: 2
6. PUBLIC FORUM (This is thc time for any person to speak on any subject not appearing on the agenda.) There was no one present to address the Commission. 7. PUBLIC HEARING A. Case No.
WZ-09·09 -An application filed by Arvada Fire Protection District for approval of an Outline Development Plan amendment to allow a fire station on property zoned Planned Industrial Development
(PID) and located at 5250 Oak Street. The case was presented by Meredith Reckert. She entered all pertinent documents into the record and advised the Commission there was jurisdiction
to hear the case. She reviewed the staff report and digital presentation. Staff concluded that the proposed modification to the original uses specified on the Skyline Estates Filing
3 ODP must be processed as a zone change and that criteria used to evaluate a change of zoning conditions supports approval of the modification for th.is lot only. A recommendation of
approval was given with conditions as outlined in the staff report. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if staff believed parking to be adequate. Ms. Reckert replied that this is a different
situation than most parking requircmcnts and would be examined more closely at the time of specilic design. Commissioner HOLLENDER asked what would happen to the existing detention ponds.
Ms. Reckert statcd that these ponds are regional and serve the developments. A drainage plan will have to be approved. In response to questions from Commissioner TIMMS, Ms. Reckert explained
that a photometric plan will be required at time of development. In regard to landscaping, she explained that irrigation would be required and native seed wnuld be allowed. Commissioner
DWYER expressed concern that there will be no access onto Ridge Road. Ms. Reckert stated that Ridge Road is a collector street, and it is policy not to have direct access onto collectors.
A traffic analysis has been done. John Greer, Chief Arvada Fire Protection District Chief Greer stated that the proposed station would replace Station #2 and would be one mile closer
to the busiest census area of Kipling and I·70 while allowing protection to the area provided by the present Station #2. This amounts to about 90 seconds less in response time. He stated
that sirens and flashing lights are not activated until after trucks have left the station. Lights would bc angled to prevent spillage into residential structures. There will be no hazardous
materials stored on the site. Diesel fuel will be stored in an approved above·ground tank which will be enelosed in a bricked·in area. The station will have sleeping space Planning Commission
Minutes ATTACHMENT 2
January 21, 2010
for 6 individuals and parking space for 13 vehicles. Extra vehicle storage will not be allowed. Commissioner MA n 'HEWS asked about access across light rail. Cruef Greer explained that
they will use Miller Street. Tn response to a question from Commissioner HOLLENDER, Chief Greer stated that he is satisfied with the Oak Street access. The station is a drive-through
design so trucks don't have to back up. In response to a question from Commissioner TIMMS, Chief Greer stated that Station #2 currently gets about two calls per day. The amount of calls
will be increased at the proposed station. He stated that it also looks hopeful that funding will be available and the station could be constructed in about a year. At the request of
Commissioner TIMMS, Brad Bonnet, the architect, presented architectural renderings of the station. lIe commented that the station would provide a buffer from the Coors industrial park.
[n response to a question from Commissioner BRJNK.JV1AN, Chief Greer explained that the fire department contracts with Pridemark for ambulance services and those vehicles will not be
stationed and dispatched at the firehouse. Commissioner BRINKMAN asked if there would be a future need for additional sleeping space at the station. Chief Greer explained that any future
additional firefighters will be housed at Station #1. Joseph E. DeMott Wheat Ridge City Council-District IV Mr. DeMott stated that he lives in Skyline Estates near the proposed station.
He stated that he is in favor of the station and, in talking with his neighbors, he has heard no negative comments. Chair DWYER asked if there were others who wished to address the Commission.
Hearing no response, he closed the public hearing. Commissioner MATTHEWS commented that access onto Ridge Road is not for the Commission 's consideration at this time. Commissioner TIMMS
stated that he would vote in favor of the application. He commented that a fire station is a much better use at this location than some of the industrial uses allowed by the present
zoning. Commissioner HOLLENDER stated that he strongly supports the fire station at this location, but suggested that the access question be reconsidered. Conunissioner MA TTllEWS commended
the Arvada Fire Department on the pleasing design of the proposed station. Planning Commission Minutes 3 January 21 , 2010
It was moved by Commissioner TIMMS and seconded by Commissioner MATTHEWS to recommend approval of Case No. WZ-09-09, a request for approval of an amendment to the Skyline Estates Filing
#3 Outline Development Plan for Lot 1 of Block 4 to allow the additional use of a fire station on property located at approximately 5250 Oak Street for the following reasons: I. The
proposed use is less impactive than existing uscs allowed on the property. 2. The proposed use will provide a buffer and land use transition from the industrial uses on the south side
of Ridge Road to the residential neighborhood to the north. 3. The evaluation criteria support approval of the request. With the following conditions: 1. A preliminary drainage report
be submitted at the time of specific ODP. 2. A lI'affie analysis be submitted at the time of specific ODP. The motion passed 5-0. 8. OTHER ITEMS A. Resolution Designating a Public I>lace
for Posting of Meeting Notices It was moved by Commissioner MATTHEWS and seconded by Commissioner HOLLENllER to approve Resolution No. 0]-2010, a resolution establishing a dcsignated
public place for the posting of meeting notices as required by the Colorado Open Meetings Law. Commissioner BRiNKMAN offered a friendly amendment to include the City's website as an
additional location for the posting of meeting notices. The amendment was accepted by Commissioners MATTHEWS and HOLLENDER. The amended motion passed unanimously. B. Mixed Usc Forum
-Northwest Subarea Plan Update Meredith Reckert stated that a forum was held last week with about 35 people from the Wadsworth corridor area to discuss new regulations concerning a mixed
use zone district. She invited Commissioners to attend another forum to be held regarding the TOD area around 50th and Ward. There will be a future forum concerning the Kipling north
of 44th area. Planning Commission Minutes 4 January 21, 2010
\ . , ~" _ " City of • ~Wheat&"'dge ~OMMUNI1Y DEVElOPMENT CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COMMlJNITY DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT TO: Planning Commission DATE OF MEETING: CASE NO. & NAME: ACTION REQUESTED:
LOCATION OF REQUEST: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: PRESENT ZONING: CURRENT USE: ENTER INTO RECORD: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE SITE Planning Commission CASE MANAGER: M. Reckert
January 21 , 2010 WZ-09-09/Skyline Estates #3/AFPD Approval of an amendment to a Planned Industrial Development (PID) Outline Development Plan (ODP) approx. 5250 Oak Street Arvada Fire
Protection District Peregrin Group Venture, LLC PID, Planned Industrial Development Vacant CASE FILE & PACKET MATERIALS DIGITAL PRESENTATION WZ-09-09/Skyline Estates/Arvada Fire Protection
District ATTACHMENT 3
All notification and posting requirements have been met; therefore, there is jurisdiction to hear this case. 1. REQUEST This application is for approval of an amendment to an existing
Planned industrial Development Outline Development Plan for propeliy located at 5250 Oak Street. The purpose of the amendment is to allow an additional use on the property. The applicant
has chosen the " nonspecific" ODP process which will require a future specific ODP amendment approved through public hearings with an administrative FOP approval. (Exhibit I, Applicant
letter) II. EXISTING CONDITIONSIPROPERTY HISTORY A rezoning of the property from A-I , Agricultural-One to PRD, Planned Residential Development and PID, Planned Industrial Development
as Case No. WZ-02-I3 was approved by City Council on September 8, 2003. The property was then subdivided and had a Final Development Plan approved for the residential portion only. The
property originally contained 17.67 acres (769,655.51 sq. ft.) and extended from Ridge Road (southern boundary) to W. 54th Avenue (northern boundary). Skyline Estates Filing 3 was located
south of Skyline Estates Filing I and east of Filing 2 which had previous approvals by the City of Arvada. (Exhibit 2, vicinity map with subdivision filings) The three filings have primarily
single family residential development similar in scale and style. The ODP, FOP and subdivision for Skyline Estates Filing 3 created 38 lots; 37 of which were to be used for single family
residential and one approved for industrial use (subject property). The residential component encompassed 14.49 acres with the industrial component being 2.79 acres. The industrial portion
is comprised of the subject parcel (Lot I of Block 4) and Tract H which serves as a detention pond for the three subdivision filings. The plat accommodated street dedication for all
streets in the development including Oak, Nelson and 53rd Avenue. Drainage and open space tracts dispersed through the development were also reserved. All improvements were constructed
with the residential portion of the development, including drainage improvements on Lot I of Block 4 which contains a large detention easement along the west and a conveyance channel
for the Columbine Basin adjacent to Ridge Road. (Exhibit 3, page 2 of plat document) The Outline Development Plan established minimum parameters for the residential construction including
minimum lot size and setbacks. The residential FOP established building elevations. All of the residential lots have been developed. The ODP document also established uses for the industrial
portion, as well as development parameters. The list of permitted uses on the OOP document closely mirrors the City'S CommercialOne zone district. Some of the potentially incompatible
uses (auto repair, auto sales, RV sales, etc) were eliminated from the list. Industrial uses allowed included greenhouses, office/warehouse, screened outside storage and minor assembly
and manufacturing. (Exhibit 4, existing ODP document) The development standards included 20% landscaped coverage, 40% maximum building coverage and a 35' height limitation. The remainder
of the standards for lighting, parking and signage refer back to Planning Commission 2 WZ-09-09!Skyline Eslales! Arvada Fire Protection District
the zoning and development code. Access is restricted to Oak Street. None of these standards are being modified. It is the intent of this application to modify the existing uses detailed
on page 2 to allow a public fire station. The Arvada Fire Protection District has the property under contract for purchase pending approval of this application. A conceptual site plan
is provided on Page 4. All approved development standards appear to be met including setbacks, landscaped coverage, building coverage and height by this conceptual plan. (Exhibit 5,
proposed ODP document) III. OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN! ZONE CHANGE CRITERIA The Outline Development Plan (OOP), which accompanies a rezoning ordinance, sets the allowable uses and development
standards for the property. In this instance, all parameters of the site regarding design are consistent with the original OOP. No physical changes are being proposed to the development
standards for the site; only the one additional use is being added. All references to the residential portion of the development have been removed. Because inclusion of additional uses
to an existing ODP is processed as a rezoning, Staff has provided an analysis of the zone change criteria. The Planning Commission shall base its recommendation in consideration of the
extent to which the following criteria have been met: 1. The existing zone classification currently recorded on the official zoning maps of the City of Wheat Ridge is in error; There
is not a mistake on the official city maps. The property is zoned Planned Industrial Development. 2. A change in character in the area has occurred due to installation of public facilities,
other zone changes, new growth trends, deterioration, or development transitions, There have been changes to the area due t6 the construction of the three filings of the Skyline Estates
residential community. When the filing in Wheat Ridge was in process, the City of Arvada had zoned the southern portion of Skyline #2 directly to the west as Industrial. When the zone
change for filing No.3 (subject property) was submitted to the City of Wheat Ridge, it was logical to extend the Arvada zoning with industrial uses adjacent to Ridge Road. Subsequent
to the City's approval, the Arvada property was rezoned to PUD-R (9.2 units!acre). The Arvada property has now been partially developed with multi-family residential development. Ridge
Road is classified a collector street. The most recent traffic count (2008) indicates 3732 vehicle trips per day on this section. This is also a corridor for the Fastracks Goldline commuter
rail line planned for construction in 2016. The rail corridor will provide commuter rail service to downtown Denver from stations in Arvada and Wheat Ridge. (Exhibit 6, Transportation
Structure Plan) City staff has been working with RTD on design of the station site at Ward and 50th. At the time of specific OOP, a preliminary traffic impact analysis will be required
to analysis the relationship between the fire station and traffic on Ridge to determine what type of traffic signal would be needed. Other changes in the area include the continued development
of the Arvada Ridge Development which will have a light rail stop at the northern end. Planning Commission 3 WZ-09-09!Skyline Estates! Arvada Fire Protection District
Sial/concludes that this criterion has been met. The Planning Commission shall also find that the evidence supports the finding of at least four of the following: a. The change of zone
is in conformance, or will bring the property into conformance, with the City of Wheat Ridge comprehensive plan goals, objectives and policies, and other related policies or plans for
the area; The property is designated as an Employment area on the Comprehensive Plan Structure Plan transitioning to Established Neighborhoods to the north. Employment areas are described
as existing light manufacturing, storage, warehouse, and other industrial-related uses where adequate screening is provided for adjacent residential neighborhoods. While the proposed
fire station use does not fit a typical industrial project, it will provide jobs for area residents. (Exhibit 7, Comp Plan Structure Plan) Other goals being met include the transportation
strategy to coordinate transit service with new redevelopment sites and the community service strategy to coordinate with non-city service providers to encourage residential design for
their facilities and to provide buffering for adjacent residential neighborhoods. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. b. The proposed change of zone is compatible with
the surrounding area and there will be minimal adverse impacts considering the benefits to be derived; The property is zoned industrially and allows a list of permitted uses which include
office/warehouse, screened outside storage, light manufacturing and assembly. While there is heavy industrial development located directly to the south apross Ridge Road, there is adjacent
residential development on three sides. One could argue that although a fire station may have impacts such as noise and large vehicles entering and exiting the site, the use is less
impactive than what could be built on the property under the existing zoning conditions. While it may be undesirable to have residential development directly on Ridge Road, the fire
station use could serve as a transition and butTer from the heavy industrial uses to the south. Care must be taken at the time of specific ODP to ensure adequate buffering on the north,
east and west. Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. c. There will be social, recreational, physical and/or economic benefits to the community derived by the change ofzone;
There have already been physical benefits associated with the development due to the construction of public improvements along all four street frontages adjacent to the site. Other than
one-time fees for construction of the building, economic benefits to the city will be minimal Staff concludes that this criterion has been met. Planning Commission WZ-09-09/Skyline Estates/Arvada
Fire Protection District 4
d. Adequate infrastructure/facilities are available to serve the type of uses allowed by the change ofzone, or that the applicant will upgrade and provide such where they do not exist
or are under capacity; All infrastructure is already in place. The applicant will be responsible for any other utility upgrades for the site upon development. Staff concludes Ihalthis
crilerion has been mel. e. The change of zone will not adversely affect public health, safety or welfare by creating excessive traffic congestion, creating drainage problems, or seriously
reducing light and air to adjacent properties; Conceptual design drawings of the structure indicate that it will have a residential appearance with varied rooflines and brick facades.
All drainage improvements on the property have already been constructed so this should not be a concern. Traffic to the site is limited to Oak Street. A traffic analysis at the time
of specific ODP will be required as to whether an emergency signal or light is needed at the intersection of Oak and Ridge Road. There will be a positive impact on the health, safety
and welfare of residences and businesses in the area due to better emergency response times and proximity of the new station. Captain Jon Greer of the Arvada Fire Protection District
has provided information as to how this site was selected for the new fire station (Exhibit 8, Greer letter) Staff concludes thallhis crilerion has been met. 3. The application is in
substantial compliance with the applicable standards set forth in the Architectural and Site Design Manual. The applicant has submitted an application for conceptual ODP. Compliance
with the Archileclural and Sile Design Manual will be evaluated upon submittal of a specific ODP, Staff concludes thai Ihis crilerion is nol applicable. IV. NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING The
required pre-application meeting for neighborhood input was held on August 19, 2009. Attached are minutes from that meeting and a sign-up sheet (Exhibits 9 and 10, Neighborhood meeting
recap and Sign up sheet) V. AGENCY REFERRALS A referral was sent out based regarding the request with responses below. Arvada Fire Protection District: Currently serving the property
from stations located at 12195 W. 52nd Avenue and 7900 W. 57th Avenue. Valley Water District: Can serve the property subject to improvements. Additional looped water main lines, fire
hydrants and fire sprinkler lines may be needed to be installed at the owners' expense. Planning Commission WZ-09-09/Skyline Estatesl Arvada Fire Protection District 5
Qwest Communications: Can serve. Xcel Energy: Can serve Wheat Ridge Public Works: Will require a traffic analysis and preliminary drainage report at the time of specific ODP. VI. STAFF
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has concluded that the proposed modi fication to the original uses speci fied on the Skyline Estates Filing 3 ODP must be processed as a zone change
and that criteria used to evaluate a change of zoning conditions supports approval of the modification for this lot only. Staff recommends approval of Case No. WZ-09-09 with the conditions
listed below. VII. SUGGESTED MOTIONS: Option A: "1 move to recommend APPROVAL of Case No. WZ-09-09, a request for approval of a an amendment to the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Outline
Development Plan for Lot 1 of Block 4 to allow the additional use of a fire station on property located at approximately 5250 Oak Street for the following reasons: I. The proposed use
is less impactive than existing uses allowed on the property. 2. The proposed use will provide a a buffer and land use transition from the industrial uses on the south side of Ridge
Road to the residential neighborhood to the north. 3. The evaluation criteria support approval of the request. With the following conditions: I. A preliminary drainage report be submitted
at the time of specific ODP. 2. A traffic analysis be submitted at the time of specific ODP." Option B: "1 move to recommend DENIAL of Case No. WZ-09-09, a request for approval ofa an
amendment to the Skyline Estates Filing #3 Outline Development Plan tor Lot I of Block 4 to allow the additional use of a fire station on property located at approximately 5250 Oak Street
for the following reasons: I. 2. 3." Planning Commission WZ-09-09/Skyline Estates/Arvada Fire Protection District 6
ALLRED&ASSOCIA TES Arch itecture Planning Interior Design October 27, 2009 Proposed Arvada Fire Protection District Fire Station #2 Arvada Fire Protection Districtis proposing a rezoning
on the property located at the north east corner of Ridge Road and Oak Street in order to allow for the construction of a municipal Fire Station to serve the surrounding area. Site work
will include new concrete drives for employee parking and for the emergency vehicle aprons and public parking will be located at the main entrance of the facility. Brick screening to
match the building brick will be provided at the trash and fueling station for the emergency vehicles, at a patio area for the fire fighters, at the building condensing unit, at the
building transformer, along with a monument sign for building identification. Landscaping will be provided to buffer the employee parking area and will include native seeding for water
conservation. The architecture will be sensitive to the surrounding neighborhood to include sloping sloping asphalt shingle roofs with overhangs to reduce sun in the summer months and
allow sunlight to enter the building in the winter months. Exterior materials will include brick, stucco, and energy efficient windows. EXHIBIT 1
Z~(-:.. r-'" r. EXHIBIT 2
50 o 50 100 NO 10' UTlUlY £ASEWDlT AlkITTt4G (sa MOTE II) LOT , /, /10' uruTY EASEMENT (SEE NOTE 8) LOT EASEMENT DETAIL SCAI.L: 1-"'SO-------~/, , , /I I /, I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \
\ , , , I "" DETAIL A NO """ "" /... _-------_.... .... , //\ \ \ \ \ I I I I I I I I I I I SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO.3 FINAL PLAT A PART OF THE WEST ~ OF THE SOUTHWEST ~ OF THE NORTHEAST
~, SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF COLORADO '!RAcr " " I I /I , /, /" -----I "" .......................
, , , , \ \ \ I I I I I I I I \ ""NO .W./OR EBC .A.P ~o. 2.Y ~81 o.st -\t rt«> 13 REBAR \<~:i> .". ~~~ " I ~ BENT PIPE \ I \ I I I I I I I I POINT or BEG'" G POI1ft' or COMKDICDIDIT
sw CClftH£:R, HE 1/", 3ECllON'8" TJS. Regw. rtJUNJ S" BRASS eN> STAIroIf'£D: -CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE LS 1321 2", (CITY CE ~T RI)Q( OATUW): " .. ~(t? [-27.202.00 El.. .. ~~07 (HC\iQ2V) \
\ \ \ , , " '" DETAIL B NO """ ,/~ /, /I /I ------• o • • , UL F'OlJfC) REBAR ill: eN> 'l.S 12438"" rOUND ROAR. AS NOTED fClACl ROAR ,. eN' "'l.S llk1(ll" S(T Jt:f' PM: .lH S' 8AASS
CJI>. STNIIf'El): L.AHDIUM CITY CE -":AT III)G£ c:a..DRAOCT Itt aT\" OF WHEAT IllIDGE RANGE IKQI: UT\JTY EASDIDfT, SfZ[ AS HOTED (SEt HOTE . ) ® BlCQ( NUN8ER I AF I MELO ! 11 031 She
Westmins EXHIBIT]
PfBN1mn PSEs-L~ ClJS'rolU.RY ~ S'TNJI:TllIe SU04 AS DETA04ED cwtAQ[$ NCI SltIRAGE S€DS ",., aJSTOWNtY N«1IUIC'< ..... PI! em.,..",,) V!WG CASE HISTORY: WZ-02-1J lOHI2 .... -'. SKYLINE
ESTATES FILING NOo 3 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN """" , "'" 1-' ~ ~ ...... """"'" ........ """"cn>O£ .'"_"". .. F!HCtG~&IQHT DlBTAIO!. """'NOlI AOCEtIIKJIIfY !II..&DINOC w.--. IE"'" _LOT81l1!
......... LOTWIl'n4 == AN ornOAL DE\'ELOPMENT PLAN IN THE OTY Of WHEAT RIDGE A PART Of THE NE 1/4 Of SECllON 16. TOWNSHIP ;5 SOUTH. RANGE 69 WEST Of THE 6th PRINOPAL MERIDIAN. OlY OF
WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF ..EFFERSON. STATE Of COLORADO ~ .~ -10'lIo ew..I»GNCI~ _... ..... -"""""" _... ~."!~ . ...,.-~ ,.~ 10 I"UT ~" Of« SmRV 1tUII.DHi, PI..U8 AN ADDmOJrW.. ...... ~
~ PPl.-mR'l"" ·P_1Q ... _..,_<f7'. _T,_II!III'oOtCl'."" '''' .. ,=,0:::::-,-.;;;::-.... ~ON lHll'Mu. ~•" -AMAHD'" A8 APf"ROVED "" "!HE FIW. 'awrnl""" .,.........-, .... .-... "...."
---REf'elt 10 AJmCU!! VI 01' THE AEI'EI'I:1O AJmCl.E VI 01' 1HE. 'MEAT ROOIE COOl! Of' lAWS 'MEA TNDQII!. COOl!: 01' lAWS ..... ,-_.::::.::--.::::.::-u,n,", wtEAT~ COOl! 01' LAM ....
, NOl.MI'P.l1OH ~M.L 0lWVI1liEQUllEll!M1'8 CAH .. ~IQ. I'T. ""' NO LMrfA1J.1fII HIO'IgI) ALL ..... I'T . ... T~ crn..~..,C AH_ 11.0 I'T. ,.,TIIElIIH:* ' IE '""""" ....... " 1H[ ; NOTES
RESlllENDAL STANPARDS' 1. ID«S .. 1HE SK'I\.ItE 3 CXMIt.ICTY SMM.L .-: CXlNSISlOfT V1M 1l£ Q.£V,.,lOtS ItQ..UOEII OH Tt« fINAl. ~ PlAN. O\OALL F""O"D[ NIfO NtCHtD:l\.II£ ..wL co.rONol
10 1HE P\.A.NS INIl..IJD(O IN K nw.. tJE"cI£lOPMENT PlM. 2. 1II£!IIIIOfflAl S1NJClUfIES ON LOTS AO.IoIoCDIT TO CPDI SPN:% 1RA.CTS 9tAU.. MU.U. ON 1M[ SI)f AOJACDIT 10 Tt« lRACT, THE
SAt« ~ IttCIJIIUI rut sntI..ICMI£S ON ~ LOTS. 3.. IIESIlOmAl SlIII..IC'n.RS ON CORND't LOts SIW1. HA.\iIE AI..L'Ita lH[ SIDE 01" M HOIC A FtIUR fOOT fI£lUItH OF 0lc:c:aA lI'WE .~ 'WIlAlWOIT
OF 0lHDt IIIIICk OR SlO€, TWO ..oows. ..,.. 8CWtD DtHAHCDIEHTS. VI>IU. noH I( SIDING IliA lEJ(I""-. NfD All Wia.[ SIC( YNIDS !HALL HA'¥[ PfII'IN:Y rota: 10 I6P 5aIE£M NtD M£N( UP 1HE
SID[ PI.NIE OF M HC*E. CMJtAll. fN;NJ€. NC) NDtltC1\JR£ StW..l OCIWOIW TO THE Pl..AHS ..a...I.aD 1ft lHE f14 .... DEWlJAIOfT P\.Nl. 4. 1HE ntan S£lIIIoQ( StWL. VI«'( A ........... OF
2.5 FEET SO lKA.T NO IiIOAE nwt ON£-""" or NfY SltEET FRONTAGE SHAlL KAI,I[ HOroIES WIlli 9EteAO<S OF 20 FUT. 22..1 fUT. NIl) ~ FttT. ItO THREE AO.IN%KT S1IIIl.IC1\IIES SHALL *\1£ 1HE
SMI( f1IIONT ~ 5. NO TWO ....... SlNJClUIIES $HAU. 1£ ~ .lH 1HE SANE El,£II"'lWlH OH ,to."IA(!fJ(T LDl$ OR LOTS ACIIOSS 1H( $1l(ttT. THEJIf SHALL I'IOT I[ T'M) QNtN1t. DCMIUHT IIIOJEI.S
0CJHSlIIIUC1!D c»I AD.W:I)(f LOTS • e.. Nl'CMlEC1URAl F'tATURES SUCH AS CXRIC[S, EA.'¥[ .... ltXIURSE5, SAT VM:IOII'S, sus. CNO£S,. I'CIRC:HD. D[OCS, flATIO$, NIl I!lAI..COtI[S WAY £XTDIS
OR PftO.EtT 11m) A AEQUAlI) ~ A IUJCMJU OF THIITT """'" 7. 1H( rRST FUXIR OF 1H[ fWlMT Q.£VAlIOH OF 1H[ HOlII[ SHALL HA'<£ A ........w OF 50X INOt OR STONE ~ A fQlM>-nlOT ~ ON Elno SIlE
or THE HOWE OF DO:)ORA.1M: '«AfoISCOlIC. INDUSTRIAL STANDARDS' 1. IIIJFftJtt.a or JrCIUS1NAL Mf.AS: 'IIWENE'oUI A A PAftKIHC LOT IS I"LACED ~ 1HE. Pl&JC ItMIHT-ClF-WAY N6) 1HE S'11tUt'lI.R(S).
~ ~ OF TH[ PAAICIHC /IIf£A ~AlL I[ ESTAIUSHED IET1IIEOI lH£ L'IQtfT-OF-WAY NflJ lH£ P.AMI«I J#I/V.. 1ttS ~ SCREEN 9WJ. 8[ eot.I'05£D Of LM PlNflIMOS. lOllS,. fDICES. WAll.S, ~ A ~,.,1IOtI
TtOIlOF. 1HE ~ OF TH[ St:fIIIEEJItC ~ • SU8.l:CT TO 'M SIGHT OISTAMCt TftINof4iU ~ AS OUlUNEO ON ll1£ ","ALDI:~TPLNl 2. 0UTD00ft ST~ FOIl: M ftOOSlMAI.. LOT: OUlDClOft STORAGE AS30CIA
ltD .1M It£ !'MUlRy U!E OF THE IIIUSlNH. LOT IS AI..L.OIIIIED AS Nf ACC:l'SJatY US![ IHDI DCPUCI1l.. Y 1DOIlW1ED OH AN APPRO'tUI ,...... OF¥D..OPtIIOIT P\.Nl H .... 1UIALS 10 I( STORED
WUST BE SCIIIEENlD In' A SlX--f'OOT, w:w-.......... FEJtCf:, 'MU.. CIIt ~ 'atOt f'\.UT c:tJttCXAI.3 -..ctt fAClJ1'D 1R(JII ~T f'ftOf"EJnD ......, IIUIlUC S19IttTS. 1M[ HDCIHT or Nf'(
SlCftAQ[ IrtIA 1'EMALS SHAll. NOT IJOCUD H. HOQHT OF lHE fDtCL 3, AftCMlECllIRAl F'MSHES $HALL IHClJ.U [)(T[JIICM WAlDUlS Of BRICI(, STOHL 'MXID. NfI)""'" IIADIMCI P'N!NI£. lJI£AlWDfT
tKAU. IHCUJOE D.lWENTS lI1AT I"ftOW)[ ~ tIMofIH SCHE. at£AlE ltIOI.N: AICI R£l.ET. ,.., 1MCCIJIPCIItAl( ARQIl[C'MlAt. fOES'lItA1tOH AI«> Nt1'IOA.A'OON. IroIETAL N.DIMClIS ARE ~. 4. EG'Y
IICIOSlAIAL USE stW.L I[ Of'£RAltD 1M ns EH1IIt[TY 'tfII"MI'I ,., CONP\LlU Y 0ICl.0S£.D IIJlDIrtO 'MlH THE Dal"TIOJrf OF CJU1000ft SlORME Nt£AS IOENlIlED ON 1M N'f'MMD flH ..... 0£I.(l0f'NDfT
f"l.AH. ~. ~ DE"tUIJf'MDfT $HALL tCET THE ill:[a.JI!DE'fTS OF 5ECl1OH 2&-5OS, IC)lIS11IAl PDIP'(IIIMNU STNIWIOS OF THl weAT IIIIOG( COO[ ..-LAws. TOTAL SIT[ N1£.k ...-....... ..n STATISTICAL
INfORMATION 189.6'6.S1 SQ n alO.820.1e SO n 1J8,734.75 SO n foIIM8ER (E D'tIIflLIHO lHTS: 17." ACA£$ 14.49 ACRES 3.18 M:fI£S 37 LOTS 2.0IID4J /~ 2.56 rAJ/III; 3..2 ACRES 4.79 AI(:ft[S
~" ...,... ;).2.~ 0'IIIEl.l.WC I.ItITS PER Jaf£ (CROSS. 17.87 ~): O~ lHJS PElt ACRE (HET, 14.49 At'AES): OPOI SPAa: REQUII[I) (~ or PRO ~): OPEN sPAa: PROWlQ): AII£RNI£ lOT SlZE: AIOHT-Of
-WA V-0E0ICA.1K:Itf: 1~7,730.1Sl SO n :t08,1.86 SO n 11.a71 .Sl2 SO n 141.154.J8 SO n TRACT IttEOB"ADQ~ lRACT ,., HOA DIWHACE, OP(H SPAC[, IMIC.t.ltOH .n ""'" 118,eaSl . .l2 SO Fl mM:T
B HOA ""'" .,..". a07 ACRES 3.03t.78 SO n ....... 'HOA ""'" .,.ACE 0.21 ACRES Sl.2M.81 SO n lRACT 0 ItOA OP£H SPAa:. IfWGAltOH ~ .. ""'" 2.400.00 SO n '!RACT E I-+OA ""'" .,..". ~20
ACRES 8.549.15 SO n lRACT r HOA ""'" .,..". ~22 ACRES Sl.M7.o.l SO n 1RA.CT G HOA OP£N SPACE, IARlCAllON ~" ...,... UMI.l. SO n ~T H HO.o\ DfWHAC[,()PEH SPAa: ~,. ""'" 34,00J.35 SO n
LOT IHfORWATIQH .... -BlOCK 1 LOTS 1-12 SlNGL[ f ........ 'I' R£SUHn,tll BlOCK 2 lOTS 1-13 SlHOU: ,. ....... T R£SIOCNll""-III..OaC ;) LOTS 1-12 SIHCt.E r ......... 'I' R[SIlOrnAl ...,-..
BLOCK ~ lOT 1 COtAIEJtOAL/IHOVSlRIN.. ,I LEGEND: ----, .. , -0-... • 1 CD " ----&4+9-----OHE OHE 77777777777777 -SKYLINE ESTATES 2.19 M:R£S 117.243.22 SO n 2_.9 ACRE5 108,41 • . 21 SO
n 1.43 A.atES 101,05&.10 SO n 2.01 ACRtS 87.731.34 SO n F'fKlPOSEO BOUNOARY LlHE PfUF'Q5£D R.o.W. PItOPOSEO LOT I.K _nOOU<t: PR<IPOSElI ""_ _ .... "" PRCPOSEO UTUTY EStIT. PROPOSED IRRICAlIOH
ESWl. PROP05IEO lNIOSCAI'( ESWT. PROPOSED WA.IOR COHT~ --.."""""" PROPOS£D IRRICATlOH 0ft.V( PROPOSED WAT£IIt LK PROPOSED SNIT ARY S£lIiIER PItOPOSW SfCR,I S£lII(R PROPOSED LOT ~ PR<IPOSElIIk.OO<
..... """"""" S1AEO LJGHT £XISlIIeC R.a.w. ElIIS1JIr«: [01< 0CISlJ0fC FLOW LM DCIS1'ftC IroIA.IOft COHltlUR =-: ..... -.,..,... ""'" [)CISUtC 0'00IHE.AD D..EC1RIC (XI:5lJMC m([s EXHIBIT
4
I ~ CO CO ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.!! E~ o~c~r ~-COi> :~_ ;::~~ ~ CO ~ ;.:; ~ ~,j ;;; .~ ..,~ ~ 9. ~ Q C? fIO O c> 88 88 7 ~ ;! ~ ;.;.;..;.:.:.: -Nt",> ~O ~S VICINITY MAP !CH.£: ,-. 12111t
lEGAl ()f$C8lPDOH' AU. '!KAT ,.1Ifr or lH[ IIIDT 1/1 (6 lHI: SCIUlHIESl 1/4 Of lHE """':!k.4 (6 !ECTIOM ,'-~ ;) 3CII.I1H. IWIGI[ • 'IIEST or 1Mt .1H PM«PAL CJtY or wt£AT I'W)C£. ccum'
or .DnJt!OM.. SfA~ or CCl.DRAOO,. L...a NCIm+ or .lH..I.: .C..C.I.,I !ITY ~ KHO'IJII'II AS AIOQ( ROAO, IirD£ PNmCIA..AN,.Y ~ AS ~ AT M SOIJ1tfWEST c:oN«lt or 1H( MOImt(A$T 1/4 Of SAl)
5EC1lOH ' .. ltiDfCt NOItnt ocnS 11" 'tIUT. QIiI AHO AUlftG lH[ MST LJM[ OF SAl) MOItMAST 1/4. A DlSTANI% OF 71.25 f'fET 10 A PaNT ON n€ fIICIRlt4EJa.'I' .R.lC-»fT or w.y UHt Of RI)Q[
JIO,frO, 5AIO POIKT .auo IDHQ 1H£ 1JIlI( POIfT Of
THEHCf: I'GtlH 00'13' W IIEST (101 NI) ~ THE WDT lH Of SMl MOR'MAST 1/4, ... DlSTAHa: OF 1246.20 nET 10 1H[ MOImftIEST <XRD or SAID SCU'nftIDT 1/4 or M MQRlH[A$T 1/4; ~ POt1H et'35'
34-£AST. ON NID ALOMO 1HE NCJnH lK or SAl) SOIJlH'4IDT 1/4 or lH[ NOR1t£AST 1/4. A DlSTN«:!: OF N6.OI I'[£T TO THE NClRMA$T c:oRte Of !1M) EST 1/2 or THE 30UlHWEST 1/4 01 THE NOffTH[A$T
1/4: lHEMC[ SOUTH 00'12' W EAST, ~ N4D ALONG 1\iE EAST LINE or SAl) VEST 1/'l or lHE SOUlHlflESl 1/4 Of THE NCIR1HEAST 1/4, It. Dl5TNItE or lc.a.47 f'£ET TO A POffT ON THE ~y RI(;1tT
or WAT l.IE or SMl RI)GE fl(W); lHENOE SCIJ'tW 74"l1"XI" .aT, ON AI«) .fIUlIIG SAl) lIGHT or .... .,. lM. A tlm'AHCE: OF .. to F'tET tr.IOIt[ OR lESS 10 lME P<WfT 01 ~ COI'fT"'*fC 78i.e~
!QUARt: FtET ('7.17 ACI'IES) WOA£ 011: LDS. SKYLINE ESTATES FILlNG NO.3 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN OfFICIAL DEIIElOPMENT PLAN IN lHE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF lHE NE 1/4 OF SECTION
16. TO~SHIP 3 SOUlH. RANGE 69 \\£ST OF lHE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF .EFfERSON. STAlE OF COLORADO COVER OF lH[ If'II)MllUAl HCItoIEO'MO.. WASTER DECI.NtA'lION
r:s • 10 PLA. nED PfQI(JnU SKAU. """""" .-.. ~ fOR ~ OF 'THE :IS' I:IIItHMAGE (AIPoC)4T WfH lHE MlPERlY OW£R. PMASI'tO. Ct4ARACTlR. ~, ~ MMfTDW'fC[ OF lH[~ T.-su; '"""I """"''''''I '"'"'"
e'K a..-.q 'CD --"WlD'etK'f "'-"CT A .......... " ....... """ ORAIt,AGE/...... .... ..... 1tD """""'" 1RACT • ...... , ... SOD ~ .eA ..,. ...." C ....... n" "'" .........-. HOA ..,.
"'-"", .....,.,,, "'" ~ ...... ..... 1RACT , ,n""nI" SOD ~ ...... .... 1RACT , """""' ... SDO '-"""""'" ...... HOA """' . """"'" ..., '-"">SCN'ItO ...... .... ""'" . ....... ," "1M -I
_Al ....--". ....,....,.,.,,, orn>nIOIt """ ... """""'" SDO """"""'" _ . .,-.... ..-"'-~ ....... "" SDO """"'""'"' N<V""" .... " ......... """"""" HAm< "' ...... ........,., -... ....
" .... ,," ..... SHEET INDEX; '~" ~ f ~ CASE HISTORY; CO\ER SHEET ~M .....N !fD f!lI! KIRKHAM .IIEIOOI'IDII'S. ~ • WZ-<>2-13 2 NOlES MICHAEL 11031 SHEJOOAH 8LW. 0' S iii ~!il ......
-0. lIES1IoIHS1ER. eot.a!AOO 80020 PLANNING COMMIS~IQN ?f~TlFICATIQN ; R£OOWWEHOED Fat /II'f'«OVH.. lH!SJ1!!..oAY Of _ _ _ 2012 9Y lHE ~T ""'" FUNOHC """""""" In~!b~ CITY CERTlFICA ~~:
_~,,,.. mkc ri I , . .;. ~::)(~!:!. J PlAN ':ON8VLTlNO BNGDlBBU PHONE: {J0.'5)-46&-1831 ~~~~~~ __________________________________________________________________________________________'
._'_W_=:==~;:~~=-~"~=--~~~::m_~-_-*_" _______F _~_._(___~_ -__~_ -_'_~_ ________________________________________________________ ~SH~E=E=T_ _ l~0f=_~3:J SKYLINE ESTATES FlllNn NO~ onp
'!:8J --N SKYLINE ESTATES FILlNG NO.3 OUTLINE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AN ornOAl DEVElOPMENT PLAN IN THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE A PART OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 16. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 69 Yt£ST
OF THE 6th PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE. COUNTY OF JEFfERSON. STATE OF COLORADO i-' ll 'C3J LJ ,I L-__ .J 1 5 ._------------------e i I '" I a> .... efA u ........ \ \ \ \
" \, ", . \ \ \ \ ' \ '. e,o n, l _oJ.J._ PIlOJBCT BITE 120 COftNER, H£1/4. SEC1IOtt 1&, 'D'-Re:8W rOUND ,. BRASS eN> STHWW: ·OTY ~ -.HEAT RIOCE LS 13212" SKYLINE ESTATES FILING NO.
3 ODP
Future Improvements -.. -Road Capacity and Safety Improvement "Complete Street" Main Street Corridor On-Street Bicycle Corridor Enhancement • Transit ...;E;;n.;;h.;. ;a;;n.;;c;.e;.;m;.;;e:;n.;.t;....
"" Future Commuter Rail Stations Existing Features Parks and ••• Existing Open Space Multi-use Trail • Public Existing Fa Ci lities Trail Connection • Existing Bicycle Underpass • Existing
Park-n-Ride Other Improvements * Vehicular Capacity Improvement • Future Interchange ~ Future Roadway Grade Separation -• Proposed Roadway --'-'~ Proposed Multi-use Trail Tra il Access
Improvement Future Trail Underpass ==-Future Commuter Rail Line City of .7 Wheat l~dge EXHIBIT 6
Envision WHEAT RIDGE Public '--'~ -" .., -----Mixed-Use Commercial Employment '\---, .-,.J d .... _~ _ -, .-.-... " :-. . -• "0 3. CORRIDORS, GATEWAYS ... __ Main Street .a. Corridor
w/rh Neighborhood POrf..16 ... Neighborhood Commercial Corridor with Neighborhood PtNtM. ,~ .. . , ,, ;.:.t;'!'# ...... -' ~ ~ . --... ~ U.;.. .,;JJ. ... _ -Primary Gateway 4. ACTIVITY
CENTERS 1') " ..... ~: .. _ ..... .... _ L I -' ''' , i---Ci lyof 7 WheatRLdge EXHIBIT 7
January 12, 2010 Meredith Reckert, AICP Senior Planner i •• .otectio 7903 Allison Way Arvada, CO 80005 Telephone (303) 424-3012 Fax (303) 432-7995 City of Wheat Ridge Community Development
Dear Meredith; District The reason for this letter is to explain the rationale behind purchasing property located at Ridge Road and Oak Street. As you know the Arvada Fire Protection
District protects all property within the City of Wheat Ridge north of Clear Creek. We have done this primarily with two of our fire stations. One located at 57th and Zephyr and the
other one at approximately 52nd and Ward. So to answer the question of why here. • Our current station two is on the very western boundary of our district. It was built in 1963 to cover
the west end df the district. It is located about a Yo mile east of 52nd and Ward and the west side of Ward Rd is in the Fairmount Fire Protection District. This is simply too close
to our border to provide the best overall coverage for our fire district. Moving the station further further within our boundaries will give better all around response from this station.
• The 1-70 and Kipling corridor is our busiest census area. This census area includes a vicinity of about a half mile around this intersection. • It is also our census area that we have
the most extended response times. This is due to the fact that our closest stations as of now are listed above. • This location puts us 1 mile closer to the 1-70 and Kipling corridor
and also will meet the increased demands of the development around the stop to be located at about Ridge and Kipling. • This location also increases our ability to back up other stations
when needed. Attached are two maps, one showing the current location of station two and its coverage based upon a 1 Y, mile radius and the second map is showing the coverage with new
station two. As you can see, the coverage for the area of 1-70 and Kipling is greatly enhanced. EXHIBIT 8
The need for the station is also based upon the fact that existing station two was built in 1963, as I stated above, when we were a much smaller department with less demands on a fire
station. The overhead doors are very narrow and short and the fire trucks of today are much larger than their older counterparts. The existing property does not allow for any expansion
of the current station, and the location would not provide us with the coverage that is best overall for the district, especially the areas of Wheat Ridge that station two protects.
If you have any further questions please let me know. Thanks for your consideration.
ov Cl .I.V. OV > 0 jl u-u jJ '-': tJ) 0 .o.v. u. i .... ; I c 0 ""0 ::J ro ~ UVlri l 'a ~ C .'.".; 0-ro cv D C) cv ...J
.111).4 Miles lUI Legend D 1.Snilerespooseradus 2 New Station 2 Proposed Station Two Fire District Coverage Proposed Sbtion 2l~ ~RdN~st Enhanced Coverage Area w* s
, , , ~~ ~ City of ~rct: Wheat&"-dge ~OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Wheat Ridge Municipal Building 7500 W. 29'" Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033-8001 P: 303.235.2846 F: 303.235.2857 NEIGHBORHOOD
MEETING NOTES Date: City Staff Present: Location of meeting: Property address: Property owners: Property Owncr(s) present? Applicants: Existing Zoning: Existing Use/site conditions:
August 19,2009 Adam Tietz, Planner Arvada Fire Protection District, Training Facility 6651 Indiana St. Arvada, CO 80007 Northeast corner of Ridge Road and Oak Street Wheat Ridge, CO
80033 Ridge Venture, LLC No Mike Piper Arvada Fire Protection District 6503 Simms St Arvada, CO 80004 Brad Bonnet Allred & Associates 580 Burbank St. Suite 125 Broomfield, CO 80020 PID
(Planned Industrial Development) The property is an irregular shaped lot a long that is approximately is 2.0 I acres in size. It is relatively flat but slopes from northwest to southeast.
It is bounded by Ridge Road to the south, Oak Street to the west, and West 53,d Avenue to the north. The surrounding area is very unique in that it is surrounded by fairly new single
and multi-family on the north, west and east sides and the Coors Brewing Company glass plant is located directly to the south of the proposed site across Ridge Rd. The plant is zoned
industrially and also has a rail spur going onto the property. In addition, a large amount of vacant land is located around the site as most of the remaining area is undeveloped. The
site does have drainage easements on the south, west, and east sides which may provide some constraints to developing the site. The drainage easements were constructed to be able accommodate
the storm water run-offofthe Skyline Estates Subdivision to the north. The easements were also designed be able to accommodate the development of this site. EXHIBIT 9
Applicant's Proposal: The Arvada Fire Protection District is replacing and relocating their Station No.2 as it is small, out of date and does not have an ideal location for the area
it serves. Station No.2 generally responds to calls north of Clear Creek to about W. 58tl1 Ave. The applicants are proposing to construct a new fire station on a vacant piece of land
at Ridge Road and Oak St. By constructing the fire station at this location they should be able to reduce their response times. The station that is proposed will be designed to blend
in with the residential character of the area. It will have multiple sloping roof lines and varying fayade planes, color and materials. The landscaping will be used to help buffer the
larger scale fire station from the surrounding neighborhood. Landscape buffers will also be used to screen employee parking from the neighborhood. The fire station is proposed to be
accessed off of Oak Street. The following issues were discussed regarding the zone change request and proposed development: • Other than the applicants and staff, 9 members of the public
were in attendance at this neighborhood meeting. The people that were present represented all areas of the surrounding neighborhood. • Staff discussed the site, its current and proposed
zoning, future land use and the process that will be required to rezone the property. • The applicant Mike Piper of the Arvada Fire Protection District gave a presentation on the Arvada
Fire Protection District and why there is a need for a fire station at the proposed location. Mr. Piper informed the members of the public that the district is not an entity of any City,
neither Arvada nor Wheat Ridge, but it is a special district that gets its own funding from tax dollars that do not come from either city. The district includes 8 fire stations, 2 of
which have been constructed fairly recently and are of the same style of the proposed station as it blends into existing neighborhoods better. The proposed station will replace the existing
Station #2 at 12195 West 52"d Avel1ue which is inadequate in size for both personnel and trucks and is further from its service area then what would be ideal. The service area of Station
#2 includes most of northern Wheat Ridge from the Clear Creek Greenbelt north to the City limits. Mr. Piper indicated that the area that Station #2 services is the busiest in the entire
district with the area around Interstate 70 and Kipling Street contributing to that. The response times in the area are higher then what they should be and the new location would help
to reduce the response times. • Mr. Bonnet of Allred and Associates Architecture discussed the design of the proposed fire station. He mentioned that the design has been used on two
previous fires stations for the Arvada Fire District and has been successful in what the design was intended to do. One of the main goals of this station design is successfully integrate
into the existing neighborhoods and have as little impact on them as possible. The peaked roofs and varying rooflines mimic the roofs of those found in the surrounding neighborhoods.
The low eave lines bring the station more to the same level as the homes in the surrounding areas as well. Other design elements such as landscaping and screen walls are used to buffer
parking areas and other areas of the exterior that the fire fighters may use from the neighborhood. • The members ofthe public were informed of their chances to make comments in the
process and at the public hearings that will be required before Planning Commission and City Council. The following questions and concerns were voiced by of the members of the public
present at the meeting.
• Why is the access to the fire station coming off of Oak St where there is an apartment building instead of Ridge Rd or Nelson St.? The zoning that is in place was wrillen specifically
for this property. In the zoning document called the "outline development plan" or "aD?", there is a condition that the only access to the site can come from Oak St. In addition to this
note, gaining access to Ridge Rd. would require a large box culvert to be constructed as there is a 35 foot wide drainage easement that runs along Ridge Rd. The construction of a box
culvert this large would dramatically increase the cost of the project and could make it infeasible. Access cannot be provided to Nelson St. as it would cross a storm water detention
pond. This pond is required to hold water run-off ji-om storms that comes from the surrounding neighborhood. It cannot be reduced in size and a driveway across it would reduce the amount
of water that the pond could hold. • Where will the garage doors that the fire trucks enter and exit be located? The doors will be located on the east and west sides of the building.
They will face Oak St. and Nelson St. • Will the trucks use their lights and sirens at night as they drive through neighborhood? The fire district tries to be good neighbors and has
changed the way they operate in the surrounding neighborhoods of their existing stations in order to beller accommodate the neighborhood. At this location the sirens will not be turned
on until the sirens are necessary, they will not be turned on as they are leaving the station but once they are further down the road. However, the lights will be turned on as the trucks
leave the station and should not impact the surrounding neighborhood. There have been no complaints of this in the other neighborhoods where stations exist. • How will the lights at
night be mitigated? Thejire district is openfor suggestions as to both the lightsji-om the trucks and the exterior lights on the building should be dealt with. Asfor the exterior lights,
landscaping and trees are being installed to help shield the lightsfrom the surrounding neighborhood. The lights on the fire trucks will likely have little impact on the neighborhood.
The apartment building directly to the west of the station does not have I many windows on the side thatfaces the fire station. However, additional landscaping and trees can be added
in order to help diminish the affect of them. • Where will the parking for the firemen be located? The parkingfor the firemen will be located on the north side of the fire station. Landscaping
is being proposed to shield the parking area from the neighborhood. In addition 3 parking spaces are being provided for the public. These spaces will be located on the west side of the
fire station. • Will the fire trucks drive through the neighborhood when responding to calls? No, not unless the emergency is in the neighborhood. The preferred routes when responding
to emergency calls are roads that have higher speed limits and not through residential areas. When responding on calls to the north the trucks will exit the station, go to Ridge Rd.
head east to Miller St. and head north. • Did you consider other locations for the fire station? Other locations were looked at for the station. This location provided for the best response
times in the service area that was within the budget of the fire district. • When will the fire station be constructed? At this time, there is no date in mind to begin construction of
the fire station. There is currently not enough money in the budget to begin construction. For the time being, the district is only acquiring the property and taking all the necessary
steps that will be required to construct the fire station when that time comes. When there is money to build the station it will be constructed. • Will the station be manned with staff
or volunteers?
For the most part, the Arvada Fire District is a volunteer fire department. The firemen who will man this station will be volunteer fire fighters. They will be stationed at the facility
for their shift and will not be arriving at the station from other locations when an emergency call comes in. The station is manned 24 hours a day with 3-4 volunteers. • How many trucks
will be located at the station? There will be one fire engine, one raft for water rescues, and one other vehicle at the station. At the time there is no ambulance at this or any other
station and there are no plans to add any. • How many will this fire station respond to on a daily basis? This station currently averages 2 calls per day.
(j) (J1 ~ W N ...... ~ ~ '4~r ~ ,,"". z g-s~·: (>-III ~ 3 " CD ~ g, f ~ ~ » t z » s:: ~ "r'-Oms:: »zCz »s:: z -fm CD :E~ _. 'g.» ~ [,\ L "1J . -f C"t: ~ r ~O 0'> U) '"" c.J » m .. OCC
W w ~ 0. » Z-f 0 ., t: '" :::rt/l ~ 0. (J) o~ 0 --c '-., »m 0-~ ~ CD m ~O ""C o~ Ul "1J 3: c. ~CD e ~ Ul ~ C>-:::0 . C ~ 1Il-f 3:N ~ ~ C\ Z ::J r-CDO ~ -f 0.-CDO )'> & ;;tIz =<.0 ~ _m
:::l ..,.. Co CC f G'>m m< ~ ~ ;;tim c r ·0 "-~ "0 <:.. , 3: ~ -"' " ~ m ~ Z -f ~ ~ ~ "-~ '\ ~ & () C) \) () ~ ("-EXHIBIT 10
-" N
.. ~ , .( . .' City of ? WheatRL-dge ITEM NO: 2, DATE: March 8, 20 I 0 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: COUNCIL BILL NO. 03-2010 -AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ENACTED
BY SECTION 2 OF ORDINANCE 1453, SERIES 2009 ON THE SUBMISSION, ACCEPTANCE, PROCESSING, AND APPROVAL OF ANY APPLICATION FOR A CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PERMIT OR LICENSE RELATED TO THE OPERATION
OF A BUSINESS OR COOPERATIVE THAT SELLS OR CULTIVATES MEDICAL MARIJUANA PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY GRANTED BY ARTICLE XVIII, SECTION 14 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION o PUBLIC HEARING o
BIDS/MOTIONS o RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: ISSUE: o GlRDINANCES FOR I ST READING (02/22120 10) [g1 ORDINANCES FOR 2ND READING (03/08/2010) o YES [g1 NO On September 14,2009, Council
adopted Ordinance 1453, Series 2009, which enacted a ninety (90) day moratorium on the issuance or consideration of any City license or permit concerning medical marijuana dispensaries.
On November 23 , 2009, Council adopted Ordinance 1457 which extended the moratorium for an additional additional 90 days. The moratorium is set to expire on March 13,2010. One purpose
for extending the moratorium was to allow the state's position concerning regulations of medical marijuana dispensaries to develop since such regulations could limit the City's ability
to regulate those operations.
Council Action Form March 8, 2010 Page 2 The state has not yet adopted any regulation concerning medical marijuana dispensaries though at least one bill is pending before the Colorado
General Assembly. The current legislative session is scheduled to end on May 12, 2010. The attached Ordinance will extend the moratorium until July 13,2010. This will provide sufficient
time for the state to finalize its regulatory position and allow Council to consider adopting appropriate regulations for implementation in the City that are consistent with state law.
PRIOR ACTION: Council adopted Ordinance 1453, Series 2009, on September 14,2009 as an emergency ordinance. Ordinance 1453 enacted a 90 day moratorium on the issuance or consideration
of any City license or permit concerning medical marijuana dispensaries. Council adopted Ordinance 1457, Series 2009, on second reading on November 23, 2009. Ordinance 1457 extended
the moratorium in Ordinance 1453 for an additional 90 days. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City will not receive permit or license fees for any new applications concerning medical marijuana dispensaries
during the moratorium period. BACKGROUND: In November 2000, the people of the State of Colorado adopted Amendment 20 which amended the Colorado Constitution by adding Article XVIII Section
14 thereto. Under Amendment 20 certain persons are protected from criminal prosecution under state law for the acquisition, possession, production, use or transpor\ation of marijuana
for medical purposes. Amendment 20 does not protect those persons from criminal prosecution under federal law. In the spring of 2009, United States Attorney General Eric Holder issued
a statement that his office would not seek to prosecute individuals who were acquiring marijuana for medical purposes to the extent that such activity was allowed under state law. As
a result of that announcement and limited rule making by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment in July of2009, communities along the Front Range have seen a noticeable
increase in establishments operating as "medical marijuana dispensaries." Because Amendment 20 does not discuss "medical marijuana dispensaries" and the state has not adopted any regulation
or statute concerning those operations, there is confusion statewide as to state and municipal authority to regulate them. Further, there are currently two lawsuits pending in Colorado
district courts concerning the ability of Colorado municipalities to regulate or prohibit the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries. Through Ordinance 1453, Council directed staff
to begin investigating and drafting regulations for its consideration concerning medical marijuana dispensaries. Staff has drafted regulations for consideration by Council. However,
there continues to be significant discussion statewide concerning medical marij uana dispensaries, their legality and the extent to which the state and municipalities should regulate
those operations. In January 2010, multiple bills for consideration by the Colorado General Assembly concerning medical marijuana dispensaries were proposed. In addition, the Colorado
Department of Public Health and Environment proposed amending its
Council Action Form March 8, 2010 Page 3 rules concerning the medical marijuana licensing program. Although the state has not yet adopted any new regulation or law, there is at least
one bill pending in the Colorado General Assembly concerning the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries. Because state regulation or law may preempt or otherwise limit the City's
ability to regulate those operations, Council should consider extending the moratorium until after the end of the current legislative session. The General Assembly is scheduled to adjourn
on May 12, 2010. The attached Ordinance proposes extending the moratorium until July 13 , 2010. This will provide Council with sutlicient time to consider appropriate regulation that
is consistent with state law. RECOMMENDATIONS: City staff recommends adoption of this Ordinance. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to adopt Council Bill No. 03-2010, on second reading and
that it will take effect upon adoption." Or, "I move to table indefinitely Council Bill No. 03-20 I 0 extending the moratorium for medical marijuana dispensaries for the following reason(s)
" REPORT PREPARED BY: Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney A TT ACHMENTS: 1. Council Bill No. 03-2010
TITLE: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO INTRODUCED BY COUNCIL MEMBER JAY Council Bill No. 03 Ordinance No. =-:-c-:---Series 2010 AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE MORATORIUM ENACTED BY SECTION
2 OF ORDINANCE 1453, SERIES 2009 ON THE SUBMISSION, ACCEPTANCE, PROCESSING, AND APPROVAL OF ANY APPLICATION FOR A CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PERMIT OR LICENSE RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF A
BUSINESS OR COOPERATIVE THAT SELLS OR CULTIVATES MEDICAL MARIJUANA PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY GRANTED BY ARTICLE XVIII, SECTION 14 OF THE COLORADO CONSTITUTION WHEREAS, on September 14,
2009 City Council for the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado ("City Council") adopted Ordinance 1453, Series 2009, which Ordinance enacted a ninety (90) day moratorium on the submission,
acceptance, processing, and approval of all applications for City permits and licenses relating to the operation of businesses or cooperatives that sell or cultivate marijuana in accordance
with Article XVIII, Section 14 of the Colorado Constitution ("Medical Marijuana Dispensaries"); and WHEREAS, on November 23, 2009 City Council adopted Ordinance 1457, Series 2009, which
extended that moratorium until March 13, 2010; and WHEREAS, one purpose for extending the moratorium was to allow state officials time to address and possibly regulate or limit the operation
of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries on a state-wide basis; and WHEREAS, City Council has been made aware that although state officials have not yet adopted any additional regulations concerning
Medical Marijuana Dispensaries they are expected to do so before the General Assembly adjourns on May 12, 2010; and WHEREAS, extending the moratorium enacted by Ordinance 1453 until
July 13, 2010 will provide City staff and City Council with additional time to investigate, develop, and if appropriate, adopt and implement regulations with respect to Medical Marijuana
Dispensaries consistent with state law; and WHEREAS, proprietors of Medical Marijuana Dispensaries will not be unduly prejudiced by the imposition of such moratorium. NOW THEREFORE,
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE COLORADO:
Section 1. Findings and Intent. The above and foregoing recitals are incorporated herein by reference and adopted as findings and determinations of the City Council of the City of Wheat
Ridge. Section 2. Extension of Moratorium on Applications For Permits and Licenses Related to Businesses That Cultivate and/or Sell Medical Marijuana. Upon the adoption of this Ordinance,
the moratorium imposed in Section 2 of Ordinance 1453, Series 2009 shall be extended until July 13, 2010. The City staff is directed to continue refusing to accept for filing, and not
to process or review, any new applications for Medical Marijuana Dispensaries during the moratorium period. Section 3. Authority. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares
that it has the power to adopt this Ordinance pursuant to: (i) the Local Government Land Use Control Enabling Act, Article 20 of Title 29, C.RS.; (ii) Part 3 of Article 23 of Title 31
, C.RS. (concerning municipal zoning powers); (iii) Section 31-15-103, C.RS. (concerning municipal police powers); (iv) Section 31-15-401, C.RS. (concerning municipal police powers);
(v) Section 31-15-501, C.RS. (concerning municipal power to regulate businesses); (vi) the authority granted to home rule municipalities by Article XX of the Colorado Constitution; and
(vii) the powers contained in the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado Home Rule Charter (the "Charter"). Section 4. Safety Clause. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that
this Ordinance is promulgated under the general police power of the City of Wheat Ridge, that it is promulgated for the health, safety, and welfare of the public and that this Ordinance
is necessary for the preservation of health and safety and for the protection of public convenience and welfare. The City Council further determines that the Ordinance bears a rational
/relation to the proper legislative object sought to be attained. Section 5. Severability: Conflicting Ordinances Repealed. If any section, subsection or clause of this ordinance shall
be deemed to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, the validity of the remaining sections, subsections and clauses shall not be affected thereby. All other ordinances, parts of ordinances
or codes adopted thereby in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance or the code or ordinance adopted hereby are hereby repealed. Section 6. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall
take effect upon adoption, as permitted by Section 5.11 of the Charter.
Section 7. INTRODUCED, READ, AND ADOPTED on first reading by a vote of 7 to 1 on this 22nd day of February, 2010, ordered published in full in a newspaper of general circulation in the
City of Wheat Ridge and Public Hearing and consideration on final passage set for March 8, 2010, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the Council Chambers, 7500 West 29th Avenue, Wheat Ridge, Colorado.
READ, ADOPTED AND ORDERED PUBLISHED on second and final reading by a vote of to , this day of , 2010. SIGNED by the Mayor on this _ __ day of _________ , 2010. ATTEST: Michael Snow,
City Clerk First
Publication: Feburary 25,2010 Second Publication: Wheat Ridge Transcript Effective Date: Jerry DiTullio, Mayor Approved As To Form Gerald E. Dahl, City Attorney
, , < ~'r City of J?WheatRL-dge ITEMNO:~ DATE: March 8, 2010 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. 14-2010 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE RENAMING OF THE WHEAT RIDGE SENIOR/COMMUNITY
CENTER TO THE WHEAT RIDGE ACTIVE ADULT CENTER D PUBLIC HEARING D BIDS/MOTIONS ~ RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: f1I~irector of P ISSUE: D ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING D ORDINANCES FOR 2ND
READING D YES ~ NO The Senior Advisory Committee and City staff have been exploring possible new names to more accurately reflect the programming offered and the seniors that participate
at the Center. An extensive process, which included a focus group with younger seniors and current users, meetings with the Senior/Community Center Advisory Committee and numerous brainstorming
meetings with the staff, has resulted in the request to rename the Center. The new name that is being recommended by the committee and staff is Wheat Ridge Active Adult Center. The Center
is also in the process of replacing the outdoor sign using proceeds from fundraising projects and currently held in the Wheat Ridge Foundation. PRIOR ACTION: Per the Policy and Procedure
for Naming Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Facilities (2009), this request was first presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission at the February 17,20 I 0 meeting. City
Council approved the above referenced policy at the February 23, 2009 City Council meeting. V:IFormslCAFtemplate
Council Action Form March 8, 20 I 0 Page 2 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The financial impact will be minimal. The Senior Center Advisory Committee has voted to fund a new exterior sign at the Center
with funds raised by the seniors and held in the Wheat Ridge Foundation. The new name will be incorporated into the sign. The remainder of the costs will be minimal and by transition.
As new publications are due or supplies are needed, the name change will be incorporated into the documents, such as letterhead and business cards. BACKGROUND: There is a national debate
and trend emerging in regard to changing the name of "senior centers" to something that would be more appealing to baby boomers. Senior centers across the nation are changing their programs
to include more well ness and educational topics to appeal to the younger senior. Also, the public tends to pigeon hole senior centers as a place where only frail and very old people
go or where seniors reside. Even people in their 80's refuse to participate because senior senior centers are for "old people." Several Denver area centers have already changed their
name. For example, Westminster changed their center's name to MAC for Mature Adult Center; Aurora changed their name to Aurora Center for Active Adults; and Arvada changed their name
to the Apex Community Recreation Center. Lakewood has always used the name Clements Community Center. When the word "senior" was added to the Community Center name in 2000, it helped
define the activities at the center but there was also an increase in incidences of the public confusing the Senior/Community Center and programs with the Seniors' Resource Center, a
non-profit community organization located at 32nd and Chase that is not affiliated with the City. Both facilities ,h ave the words "senior" and "center" in their name. Not only does
the public confuse the two facilities, but there have been incidences when City of Wheat Ridge personnel did not know the difference. The media also mixes the two up and often publishes
the wrong information. RECOMMENDATIONS: By unanimous vote at their February 17,2010 meeting, the Park and Recreation Commission recommended to City Council that the name change be approved.
Staff supports the name change. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "[ move to approve Resolution No. 14-2010 authorizing the renaming of the Wheat Ridge Senior/Community Center to the Wheat Ridge Active
Adult Center" Or, "I move to table indefinitely the renaming of the Wheat Ridge Senior/Community Center for the following reason(s) "
Council Action Form March 8, 2010 Page 3 REPORT PREPARED BY: Joyce Manwaring, Parks and Recreation Director A TT ACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 14-20 I 0 2. Park and Recreation Commission
Minutes 3. Policy and Procedure for Naming Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Facilities
TITLE: CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. 14 Series of 201 0 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE RENAMING OF THE WHEAT RIDGE SENIOR/COMMUNITY CENTER TO THE WHEAT RIDGE ACTIVE ADULT
CENTER WHEREAS, the City of Wheat Ridge owns and operates the Wheat Ridge Senior/Community Center and; WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Senior/Community Center offers recreational programs to
adults of all ages and; WHEREAS, the Senior Advisory Committee recommends renaming the Center to more accurately reflect the programs offered and the participants that attend the Center
and; WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission recommends this name change per the Policy and Procedure for Naming Parks and Recreation Department Parks and Facilities, adopted by
Resolution February 23, 2009; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, as follows: The City of Wheat Ridge her,eby renames the Wheat Ridge
Senior/Community Center to the Wheat Ridge Active Adult Center. This resolution to be in full force force and effect from and after its passage and approval. DONE AND RESOLVED THIS 8th
day of March, 2010. Jerry DiTullio, Mayor ATIEST: Michael Snow, City Clerk ATTACHMENT 1
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE PARKS a RECREATION COMMISSION February 17, %010, Wednesday 7:00 p.m. Wheat Ridge Recreation Center Conference Room 400; Kipling Street COllllllissioners Present:
Commissioners Absent: Staff Present: MINUTES Patricia Dwyer, Helen Huitt, Liz Vecder, Susie Seeds, Guy Nalunjach, Trish Ennis, Charles Spielman and George Pond None Joyce Manwaring,
Parks and Recreation Director Rick Murray, Parks, ForestJy and Open Space Manager Margaret Paget, Forestry and Open Space Supervisor ITEM 1 DETERMINATION OF OUORUM Pond declared a quorum
present, and the meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. ITEM 2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES Commissioner Dwyer made a motion to approve the minutes of Janu3lY 20, 20 I 0, with a correction
that all mentions of Tabor Lake be changed to West Lake. Seeds seconded the motion. The minutes were approved as corrected. ITEM 3 -INTRODUCTION OF GUESTS Julie Brisson, Recreation and
Facilities Manager for the City of Wheat Ridge; Davc Ferlic, chair of the Senior J\dvisolY Committee lor lor the Wheat Ridge Scnior/Community Center; and Jan Lindgren, Vice Chair orthe
Senior AdvisOlY Committee were also present. ITEM 4 NEW BUSINESS Name Change Request for Senior/Conullunity Center -Manwaring provided background on the request for a name change. Julie
Brisson summarized reasons for req uesting the change, including trends and perceptions. Dave Ferlic and Jan Lindgren discussed other considerations for changing the name, including
informal surveys, program offerings, and connlsion with the non-City affiliated Seniors' Resource Center and senior living facilities. There was discussion. Veeder moved to recommend
a name change for the Senior/Community Center to Wheat Ridge Active Adult Center. Seeds seconded. The motion ca n'jed. ATT ACHMENT 2
Foresl1y Program Report -Marga ret Paget reviewed the Open Space Section 2009 Annual Report as submitted with thc pac ket. Highlights included an overview of the licensed tree ca rc
companies, the forestlY services maintenance bid, status of Bl ack Walnut di sease and th e Spruce beetlc spraying. management of 77 1raffi c calming islands, right o[ way property,
and Happiness Gardens, assessment of the Christmas tree recycl ing prog ram, labor services from Mile High Youth Corps, funding assistance from Urban Drainage, ongo ing assessment of
tree damage due to the storm, stati stics of tree losses versus tree plantings, fundI ng for replacement trees through a grant from Jefferson County Commissioners, staffing levels, and
outreach programs. The Commiss ioners tll<lIlked the Parks Division fo r the ir hard work and visible results throughout the Ci ty. Initiation of Park Naming Process -Manwaring reviewed
the park naming process and introduced di scussion regarding guidelines for initiating the naming process for the 38t" and Kipling Park. There was discuss ion regarding defmition of
the parameters, submission period, managi ng submiss ions, theme intent, advertisement and announcement, public input, review and selection, recommendation of a name to City Counc il
, announcement and documentation of selected name, sign co nstruction, and timeline. Manwaring will draft the specific process for 38th and Kipling Park based on di scussion and will
email it to the Commiss ioners for comment and discuss ion at the March meeting. ITEM 5 -OLD BUSINESS Joint Meetin g with City of Arvada Parks Advisory Committee -Pond reported on the
meetin g with i\PAC which was a lso attended by Manwaring, Naluniach, Veeder and Enni s. There was discliss ion rega rding how to stru cture on-go ing communication with APAC, des ignation
of a liaiso n, the high school student representative, committee respons ibiliti es, tools and resources. P\lI1d will do an initial follow up with the APAC representatj ve. ITEM 7 -PROJECT
UPDATES Manwaring Manwaring reported that: • constmction at 38th and Kipling Park remains on hold due to weather. She noted that negotiations with the restaurant owner are continuing
and making progress. • discussion of a process for analyzing options for an off leash dog park from existing City property is in the earl y stages. Manwaring will provide more information
at the Ma rch meeting. • the Depm1ment identified a new open space acquisition opportunity for a property near the existing Parks Shops that could allow for expansion of the operati
ons fac ility and of Anderson Park. The Perko property is located at 9 160 W. 44th Avenue. There was discussion. Veeder made a motion to move fOlw ard with the Perko acqui sition. Huitt
seconded. The motion carri ed. Manwaring noted that the acquis ition will be presented to City Counc il in a study session on March I. • des ign issues on the Watchable Wildlife boa
rdwalk at Bass Lake have been reso lved Parks & Recreation Commission Minutes February 17. 20tO Page 2 of3
and work is continuing. • res torati on of the Baugh House is on-go ing. ITEM 7 -DEVELOPMENT REVIEWS Case No. MS-I 0-0 I fWA-1 0-02fGatenbein There was di scuss ion o rthe two-lot minor
subdi vision, and no impact was identifi ed . Fees will be charged in lieu o f land dedicati on. Case No. SUP-I 0-0 I There was di scllss ion of the request for a Special Use permit
by the Howard Johnson hotel loca ted at 12 100 West 44th A venue to allow for parking of up to fOllr semi -trucks and trailers on the east and south side of the hotel. Due to the proximity
of the hotel property to the Wheat Ridge Greenbe lt, the Commission recommends that the truc ks not be allowed to idle eng ines or compressors for any length of time. It was a lso noted
tha t the no ise and possible pollution from th e engines could impact wildli fe at Tabor Lake, pa rt ic ularly during nesting season. Manwarin g will communica te the recommendation
to the Community Development Department. ITEM 6 -FUTURE ACENDA ITEMS Manwaring will prese nt a Mas ter Plan Updates Review at the March meeting . ITEM 9 -COMMISSIONER CONCERNS Pond a
nnounced that he has submitted an applicati on for appo il1lmentto a d ifferent Commission that will allow him to serve within the Di strict in which he now resides. He noted that his
vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Commiss ion will allow someone res id ing in the District he is vacating t~ represent that District and serve on the Comm ission. ITEM IO -ADJOURNMENT
With no furthcr business, Pond adjoul11cd the meeting at 9:00 p.m. Parks & Recreation Commiss ion Minutes February 17. 2010 Pagc30f3
POLICY AND PROCEDURE fOR NAMIN(; PAHI<S ,\ND RECREATION DEI'ART~II': NT PARKS AN)) FACILlTH<:S :\dopled by Res<)llIllonL~ -2n091~ ~ _' 2011'» Gcncl1!l 1',lrk :l lld facilities 11 ~!lll(':-;
arc otkn as elldllnn~ as the pn)Ih.~rty it self; thl.'l"l,forc, tile scleCII P!l of .1 proper name IS. ~tn d should ht."!, a scri lJu:-, r1H1tkl . S!.:k...::titl[)s ;:;h(lu lcl ath,.:IllI,t
til indu ce:1 dy namic CUllll1111111t y impact, ()dd crt,.;dihility to th(" park or ra cil lty. create a c(l lh.'~i\· l~ th eme. express ~ pprCl' i a li (l n . crCJ lc lasting puhlic
relations. p roll1~){c l'dm;alioll. lilt thL' Illind and bond our heritage and n?1 y h,.:ing to the l<tlll!. n) A ny park. parbvny, n.:crcatiolJ h uilding. swimming ponl, b ~lll field,
or any o ther 1;lcility Ilwnagcd and l'()ll lro lkd hy til l; Parks ~l1d RL'I..Tl'.ltl(l11 Dc parllllL'1J1 o/" the City or \\' IH.'ilt Ridge, 11I .. 'r L'Jll:dh:J eallt:d pllrk atld
'{lr fac ility, shall he tlamed o r n': II:llllcc! only h.\' the Park:, dlld Relll':tlh.l ll ll C(lIllJll I:-i:, ioll I IIl 'lllinnall \L' n He or 2' 1 tll ~ IlI) llt\' l) r all /ll
Clllhcrs II! :-;; l l ti l..: l llllllll :-is il)ll pn.: c.: L'lit 11) Tllc 11 ,II1lc :-.11<.11111\(,;11 h CI.. 111l iC lhe..: Id!i ciailJdll lC UpOIl ilppl o\ .d 0 1 ;123 nliljPli\
\ o rlbe ( " 1\ C Olll l l..·i1. c) Ir llll" rCUHll1lll:IH.kd IWIl!!,: is 110\ appl{lv cLi by ('\1\ ('tHlllI.. . : il.lhl: ltell l :-:hal! h\..· rclcrn. .'. d hal k 10 the P:.JI J...s
:llId l\ecJl..'a li oll (·1l 111Jl1I S~ i(l!l . 2) Na.!!linl!. Proposals: a) Prllposal:-; to Jlallll.: <my p~u'k ~l1ld · or facility may be 1l1J ll1lkd hy any Parks and J<clT\..'ati(l!1
COll1llli ssio ll mCmhtT ill ilnv rcgulm llH.:cting Dr thc com miss i oJl. Also, 1'lIl )' citi/.CIl of \V 11(:11 I Ri dge or 111 1..' Di rc..:c in[" of Parks and Recreation lll ily ~uh
lllit proposals in writi ng (11" by personal appeara nce ::It 11 11 )' regular nH:~c.:!t ill g or the co mrni ssion. b) Any such proposals must iJlclude reasons for the proposcJ name
:.tno as much much I" idence as possible in the form o f kners, pet itions, andlor personal appearance at a Parks and Recreation Commission meeting, of neighhorhood or cO lllmunity suppo
rt of Ihe proposed nalll e, c) Any such lcl!ers or pt.:tit iuns IIlLl.st CLTlify that each s ig ner is tU' has been a rcsic.knl of Ihe City of Wheat Ridge, sho\\' each s igner's address
and tck"lwnc number. c.I) Tit\,; Pal ks and Recreation COIllJni ssioll, through (he Park.s and Rcc..: rcat iOIl Department, m ~l y hut is no! required to sol ici l names from the gem.:ntl
public for park lwml!1g. ATT ACHMENT 3
Policy and Procedure f(Jr Naming Page 2 Pa. ks and Ree. cati (Jn Department Parks and Fac i I i t.es i) Park nalllcs may be solicited within p.lr;undc rs establi shed hy the P"rks and
Rl-creation Commiss ion for a specili c s. tc. II ) TII11e limits i(lr name cons ideratiolls will be e~ t :Jhli s il cd h\ th l: Parks and Re('rcation ( '()Jllilli ss ion on an ind ividual
park has IS. J) Nanlln~ G.nddincs. u) All PI\)posed 1I <.tllll.!S shall meet on ~ o r m ll l~ of the full l1wlng gUHkIIIlCS. Ilowcvcr. till' Parks and RCL:reatiol1 Cummi:o:s ioll Illay
\\'ai ,'1..' allY or ~III or these gliiti elllll'S upon a Illoti un appru vl:d by iI maj ority of LUll1l11i ~s ii.l[l 1lIt.:.'lllhers present. b) ,\ park <lnd/or facility may he named
fo t ' i) 1\.11 l'\' I...:!ll: pro vid ... ·d su ch 1...·\ CIH direc tl y afkl lcd , a ffcl.: ts 1I1 would h I.: Il h ; alllll g ful \() the citi z l'l1s of \Vheat I{idgc [I) {\ _ t!C
Cl'. ISl'c! P(T~ll l.!: pn)\ Ided [ li e' pe lSf1n li as hc' e ll k n owll II I be 1)1' g{)\)t! ch:ll:tc tc r. kll (lW I1 10 hil\L' 1l ~ \ ·LT b ~e ll CIJIl \" ickd o f a IdLlll \ .•
lIld hao;; Cillllll h U1L'd to thL' h e.! IILTIll "; 1I1 n \ \Vheat Rid ge.! III Sl llll l' gr ed lci Ih <1 11 rl\ c lilgc Illdllll e l 1)1" \ \ 111) was o f 111 :--. 1\ 11 I l: Slg
Jllli (" lJICL' ttl thL' ( ' Il y. ( ·\l lllll ). St all: (11 N.t[ II )11 . Ii i) ,:\. li vinf! jH.T. SOIL pro\ ilkd he -s il L: has met nil se lc ....· IIOIl guidd inL's kll' ,I d L'(,l'a~cd
111.:1 " 1.111 and who in nd <..litl o ll ha .... b eell L'xc eptiPIl ;IIi ). I llJt s l ;J lldlll ~ III hb 111.:1' u )[Itnhuli llll tll the betterment of \\'h ....:;\1 Ridge. III addltl
o ll , a wntle ll appro val s lgn ..:.. d h ) thL' s a id persoll .. agrcclll!:;. ! (l th e nnm!llg. mus t b e Suhl1l1tkd with till' pru posal. i\') A donor or group of do nors or land
, co ns.d erable p ... .l pcrt y. or money. proy.dcd such do nation wns l ~lI ge alld s ignifi cant Of rcpl"~s cllt cd cOll s id efilhk sacrifice by the dono r or donors. v) A 1~ l rtct:
name, slieh as the neighborhood where located 01 a geographical or manmade iCature; provided this name .ends to id enti fy the tocation or character ort he park andlor ra cility. 4)
Unacceptah le Nam es: Generall y, no park andlor rae ility may be named fo r any or the following unless wa.vcd by a majmity of the Parks and Recreat ion Commission members: a) Any person,
li ving or deceased , who has had no eonnee.ion with Wheat Ridge, excepting perso ns or histori eal s igni fi cance to the C ity, C"Ullty, S ta te or Nation.
Policy alld PrOccu ure lar Naming Page 3 Parks and ReCl""tillll J)cpal1mcnt Parks and Facilltlcs b) All )' (hlllch 0 1 leii gioliS llrg<lllizatillll. puhtlcal org.ani/,ltilln. scn ICC
club, fraternity orga lll zatil)1l or any olht.'r lllg<ln iLCd gHlllp unless they fully meet tilt.: gUlllelll1cS listed ahove. ~) l:.xi .< lJng Ilames: :l) This pt11icy Iws [l() CrfCl
I on (;X i '-;tlll,t!. nrtiL'I:t1 <lIld 'llr :lcL~ pl l'd IWl l i t'S \If [larks and til" t1h:iiilies. b) Tht: /(Jllu\\'lng such nanh;'S :tflo! hL'l i..'hy {iL-signah::ci as olTlcliI1
n ;lllH.!S UpOJl passage (II this pulicy: i) .'\ nciL'1 S.Q.!.L ('~HllJ1lllll i t V 13 u ddi ng A n'::llue and Pldd Street named act i olll)fCII\' ('Olllh.::d . " building III Wile"t
Rid g~ at \\'est -I~th in hOllor of \\' heat Riuge's lirsl f\1nyor by 11) :l1llkl~"O Il Park 1 p;lrk fi t \\\,:sl 44th :\\'ellUl' ;llId held Street. o ri ginn lly lI i! tll L'd \\'h~~lt
RIdge [\"'''' was rcn;!IIh..:d 111 Il{IlHll (d Ih\.., fi l S\ I\ l a~PI llf \Vhl!at Rldg(' h~ :!t.:t[PI1 \11 l'it~ ('\IU l ll: tl III) \pd-I?'-II,::hel P~II.L ;t palk ~It \\'C~l -J 511l
.\\~Illll.' <IIHI \':lnn~ S! n.T! llaillt.:d Ill! hislurll: 1<llldU\\IlLT" nl lh~' P!lIPL'll ~ J\" UllVd's C'wsslIlg L:.lrk i.l park ~Il \\'esl 451h A\'LnUl' ;ll1d !:\'erUt Stn:d 1l;lIllCd
je)!' a hi s!\.l rlC ;-; il l.' lIsl:d t ll cross {'k;lr ('Icek, \ ) ili~IJ Q~d~ Gn.:t.:nbd!..l::ill.k 1':11 j., ~I I t:i l '> along {' k:l!' ('1\'1.:" (lwned and k:tsed, ":XCL'pt1Jlg
those :II'CilS \\ ilh other IH111ll'S -Johns~\Il, .~\ !ld t::rS(lJl .lIld PIll ~Pt.'Ct. \'i) CI eeksidc Park a rurk located :11 4<)th and r-.laJ'sh,tl l SIn.:c1 !lctmed lor its geographic
loca ti oll ;lx.lj;lI..:cnt to Clear Creek inc lll(ilng r-. lall\varing Field namcd through IhL (. 'olnraLio R1Kkics rield-of-Dreams Program and named after Rockies ~a t rhc r Kirt l\ianw;1ling
who personally contrihuted fllnJ ing, \ii) Foundns' Park -~I pa rk al 37th ,1-\vcnUL: and Jay Slrecl, a fonllt:r ca rn<Jlioll grc~Jlhousc site rHlJlletilur alt orlhc launders orthe \Vheat
Ridge ('ommullIty. vii i) "Hank"_S tites Park _. ;) park at West 29th and Newland Street naJned in ho nor of Mayor Frank (Hank) Stites who was also a lo ng tillle member or the Wbeat
Ridge Recreati on Di strict Board. ix) Happi ness Gardcn~ a cOJl1Jnun ity gardell at 4226 Ammons Street naill ed to recugni zc th~ happiness that garden ing would bri ng to the students
or \Vi lmore Davis elcnH.:nlary school who \\'lTt: being t:lh.:ouraged to partici pate, xl Hayward Park -" pa rk at \Vest "9th Avenue and Wadsworth Boukvara named in hOIH)r of til l,:
pre\'iolls uwner hy Parks and Recrcat iull Commission action, xi) iJisJorieal Park a park at ~6th Avenue and Rubb Street named by genera t usage (JJ1c1udJJ1g Sud House, ('",diban Cabin.
the lirst Wh~at Ridge Post OO, ce and iVluseum).
Po licy and Proced ure ror Naming Page 4 Parks and Recreation lJepartment Parks and Fac ilities Xli) Iloraee E. I{alllbli Palk a park at 41rd Awnuc and Fenton Stred named by the board
o f the Wheat Ridge Recreat ion Distli c t in ho nor of a board membel. sccrdary of said board !'()I" many yea rs. who in this cJ:p;,tt.:ity did much ror parks and recre<llioll ill the
area. xiii) Johmon Park a park at Clear C red and WaJs\\"('lth Bouk'·arJ. T he e,,,ted), ponioll \vas named hy {ilL' dOllor in hOllor Ill' his dt:t:eascd wdc. Elizabeth JO!U1SU Il ,
as a cond ition or the gi ll In the \Vh cat Ridge I. i(llls Club (wllo subsequent ly don"led the park tn the Wheat Ridge Reeloati " n District). The westerly purtion W<lS named Samuel
Johnson Park ill h OI1( 1I ,.1' th ~ UOlllll . Judgt.: Sallluel Johnso ll. Subsequent addi lions to this park betw(!cn Wads\vol1h Boulevard and West ~~th A venuc by tlie City "r IV h,'a
t R id gc. also bear the name Johnso l1 Parle XIV) Panorama park -a park at 35 th Avenue and D cp(!w Street named by contCSI when under thcjuri sdictlOll urlhe \Vhc~t Rldgc R t.:c lcatio
l1 District. x\') l)~lrallloll lll Park --:1 p:ll k at \Vcst ~ 7 t h A\'CIlU l' ;lJld Klplillg SlICe! nallh.:'d Ill! til L' suhd i\' i,..; inn ill which it \\':lS l\l~':lt(:d WI1I..'11
under th e' jurisdl ct h)ll or th l.' 1' 1'(1:-> P( 'I..: 1 1 ~l'l' I I..·~I1[OIl I )1 , tllL'1. ,\\,1) ProSPL'I..'t 1';,11 1.. a park at \\'c:->t -I ·HIt :\\"l~ll ll C and IZobb S tI
LL! 11,111 H,X I ",111k ullLkr thL iu ri s~ lJ cli(l11 of thl..' l' rl l"qll'L't RenC,lli oll Di st ri ct in ih)llO l IIf earh prospectors wilo call1 l: up (' lear Creck, '\\ '11) Richards-Ilan
Es tate H p:lrk and hI storic mansion 10cntcd at \\'e~t 2R IIl ,"-\ \'l' Il Ul' :tlld l3elllnJl Sired and named for the orig. inal OWIl t:J build", .. ! and th l.! O\nlCr in longest
res id clll.:t.:, XVIII ) ~Yht.:aLRidgc i\ l ullICljllil PQQ! -the: ll ~l rne gi \'cJ1 It l the olltdoor pllol located III A nderson Pnrk at 4411/anti Fi eld \\-hell it was cOllstrudcu
and op'..:llt::d to till: public in 1980. xix) Wlreat Ridge Rccreati on Ccnter -Represcnts thc geographical loca tion "r the Center. Named by City Coun cil action. xx) Wheat Ridge Senior/Culllmunitv
Center a bui lding at 6363 W. 35th Avcnue used by the seni ors of Wheat Ridge and as a cOlllmunity center fo r recr eationa l programming tor the citi zens of Wheat Ridge. Named by City
Coullcil action_ T he renaming o f parks and fac il ities is s trong ly di sco uraged. It is rccolllm e" ded that e ffort s to change a name be s ubj cct to the mos t criti cal exam
ination so as not to diminish th e ori gina l j us tifi cat ion for the n"mc or di scn unt the vaJue of the plior co ntributors. }\ renaming or cha nge in name wil l be cons idered for
the follow ing c ircums ta nces: a) Only thnse parks and facilities named lo r a location or subdi vis ion sha ll bc co nsidered for renaming.
Policy ,md Procedure for Nam ing Page 5 Parks ~ nd R l·~ H.;nti \l !l Departm ent Park :s il llri facilit ies b) Parks Clnd raci llti e~ I""ned aft cr indi\'idu :lis slwll never be chan
ged unl ess ii IS found that th" ind ll idual 's personal charCl cter is or was such tilat the co ntinued usc of the name tin a park or I"cdity would not he In the hcsi interest of tile
cO lllllluni ty, This policy and procedurc , 11:111 occome eftceti \'c ,uld binding upon tile Parks and Recreation Department and tile P:lrks "nd Recrea tion COlllmiss ion as ~ o ()
n as it I"" heen I(lrmally :ldopted by d 2/1 Illajnrity ill" 1he !11cmh«..: rs of tile Park::; and 1{ ~L' rl..:a t\(lll CnmllllSSH1) I prest' llt. and a 2/3 llIaj ori t:-.' ()r Ci ty
('l Hllh:it. This pOIH':y and pmu::d lln,; s h ~dl L'u lltinul' in e ffect regardl ess lIf Ill~JI\I h'T change .... , (I I' IhL' Cl l lll lll isSllHl , but Ill;) ), be <l 1ll t'!llkd.
dU[le awa y w ith, OJ rc-wri tt (; 11 al '-III): 1111\ (' b)! <l rn a10n!), assent ing Vole Of"thL' ( ( \ )I1Hlli s ,,> ju ll 11 1C lIlh t:: IS pre .... C1l1 and a majo rit)' ore 'i
1)' Cnull c.i l. The above Policy and Prncc:dure /"Jr Ni.Il11ing Parl\.s and Re~l eat lO ll D t.:partllh': lll !'alks dlld Faci li ties W(\ ~ adopted hy <I lIlajority of the 1ll ~lllb
e rs of the P"rks and Rc.c.reJtion Comm iss ioll prc;-;c.nl:!l the rq,-~lli a r mC'd lll £.!, hL'11! JCl llunry 2 1, 20W). ,2 ,11-I{ '''I' II l1 ugll e" , ('11 :111' l' ark:-; ;:111
(\ R.L'I . ."rt..";!tl llll ( ·Ol1l lll IS:-\ l ll ll ATTEST: ~u~-Michael SilO\\" City Clerk
·, ~ -City of , WheatRt..dge [TEM NO: -.1:r\ DATE: March 8, 20[0 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE THE RA TIFIeA TION OF THE MAYORAL APPOINTMENT TO THE WHEAT RIDGE
FOUNDATION o PUBLIC HEARING ~ B[DS/MOTIONS o RESOLUTIONS QUAS[-JUDICIAL: City Clerk ISSUE: o ORDfNANCES FOR ISTREADfNG o ORDINANCES FOR 2 ND READfNG DYES ~ NO City Mana* The Wheat Ridge
Foundation nominates candidates to the Mayor for appointments or reappointment to the Foundation and the Mayoral appointments are then ratified by the City Council. Mayor DiTullio has
asked that Floyd Sasa be appointed to the Wheat Ridge Foundation, term to expire March 2, 2012. PRIOR ACTION: None FINANCIAL IMPACT: None BACKGROUND: None RECOMMENDATIONS: Mayor DiTullio
recommends that Floyd Sasa be appointed to the Wheat Ridge Foundation. V:\FormsICAFtemplate
Council Action Form March 8, 20 \ 0 Page 2 RECOMMENDED MOTION: "[ move to ratify the Mayoral appointment of Floyd Sasa to the Wheat Ridge Foundation, term to expire March 2, 2012." Or
" \ move to table indefinitely the appointment of Floyd Sasa to the Wheat Ridge Foundation for the following reason(s) " REPORT PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY: Janice Smothers, Admin. Assistant
to the Mayor and City Council Michael Snow, City Clerk ATTACHMENTS: I. Wheat Ridge Foundation letter
February 16, 2010 Mayor Jerry DiTullio City of Wheat Ridge 7900 W. 29th Ave. Wheat Ridge, CO 80033 Dear Mayor DiTullio, We respectfully submit the name of Floyd Sasa for your appointment
to a vacant seat, whose term expires on March 3, 2012, on the Wheat Ridge Foundation Board of Directors. These appointments will also need to be ratified by the members of the City Council.
We are currently holding the one remaining vacant seat open pending response of potential candidates. Please advise me when this appointment has been processed. Thank you for your consideration
Sincerely Yours, Wheat Ridge Foundation Curtis J. Gilmore, President 303-422-6477 ATT ACHMENT 1
•• < • r City of p WheatRL..dge ITEMNO: ~, DATE: March 8, 20 I 0 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO APPROVE A $40,000 CONTRIBUTION TO THE WHEAT RIDGE BUSINESS DISTRICT
FOR THE PURPOSE OF FUNDING THE REVITALIZATION INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM o PUBLIC HEARING [gJ BIDS/MOTIONS o RESOLUTIONS QUASI-JUDICIAL: ISSUE: o ORDINANCES FOR 1ST READING o ORDINANCES
FOR 2ND READING DYES [gJ NO The Wheat Ridge Business District (WRBD) is requesting continued support from the City in 20 I O. The General Fund budget approved during the 20 I 0 budget
process allocated $40,000 from the Economic Development budget to WRBD for the purpose of funding the Revitalization Incentive Grant Program. PRIOR ACTION: The General Fund budget approved
during the 2009 budget process allocated $40,000 from the Economic Development budget to the Wheat Ridge Business District. The WRBD committed II grants totaling over $52,000 for signs,
awning, fayade and architectural improvements for local businesses in 2009. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The $$40,000 was approved during the 20 I 0 budget process. BACKGROUND: The 38th Avenue
Business District Board of Directors was appointed at the August 12, 2002 City Council meeting. At that same meeting, the allocation of$93,500 from the Capital Investment Program (CIP)
unallocated fund balance to the 38th Avenue Business District was approved. Funding for fiscal years 2003 to 2008 in the amount of $40,000 each year was allocated from the V :IFormslCA
Ftemplate
Council Action Fonn March 8, 20 I 0 Page 2 budget to the 38th Avenue Business District. In 2005 the 38th Avenue Business District changed its name to the Wheat Ridge Business District.
The General Fund budget approved during the 2010 budget process allocates $40,000 from the Economic Development budget to the Wheat Ridge Business District. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends
approval of the $40,000 contribution to the Wheat Ridge Business District for the purpose of funding the Revitalization Incentive Grant Program. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "[ move to approve
a $40,000 contribution to the Wheat Ridge Business District for the purpose offunding the Revitalization
Incentive Grant Program." Or, "I move to deny a $40,000 contribution to the Wheat Ridge Business District for the following reason(s) " REPORT PREPARED AND REVIEWED BY; Patrick Goff,
Deputy City Manager Randy Young, City Manager ATTACHMENTS: I. Letter from John Marriott, Board President, Wheat Ridge Business District
FebrualY 26, 2010 Patrick Goff City of Wheat Ridge 7500 W 2911. Ave Wheat Ridge CO 80033 Dear Patrick, ({!::;t Ridge BUSINESS DISTRICT I am writing today to give you an update on the
Wheat Ridge Business District , and to request our 2010 fundin g of $40,000.00. In 2009 the WRBD committed 11 total grants totaling over $52,000 fo r sign, awning, fayade, and architectural
improvements. • All About Cabinets 3502 Wadsworth Blvd. $1,444·00 Sign • CalvaIY Temple Christian Church 7390 West 3811. Ave. $1,002.00 Sign • Computer Cli nic 7640 West 44th Ave. $825.00
Sign FaGade, Sign, Awning, • DDK Propelt ies, LLC 3291 Youngfield $14,000.00 Archi tecture • Destiny Hair Design 6729 West 3811. Ave. $1 ,821.74 Sign • Habitat I-lome 10625 West 1-70
Frontagc Improvement Center Road,!Sllite 1 $2,737-42 Sign • OHM Acupuncture 7615 West 381h Ave. # B107 $2,357·97 Sign • Ornamental Bcads 5712 West 38th Ave. $2,747·50 Sign • Rejuvenate
Fitness 3258 Youngfield $3,000.00 Sign • Sandalwood Partnership 3835 Harlan Street $10,069.50 10,069.50 Fa,ade, Sign , Architecture • Tuthill Investments 6790 West 3811. Ave. $ 12,000.00
Fa,ade, Sign, Awning For 2010 the WRBD will continue to promote our revitalization incentive program, thm matching grant assistance for signs, facades, awnings, and architectural designs.
We appreciate your past and continued support of the Wheat Ridge Business District. Sincerely, J ohn Marriott Board President, Wheat Ridge Business District A TT ACHMENT 1 PO Box 1268
Wheat Ridge CO 80034
, . .'. City of p WheatRl.-dge ITEMNO:~ DATE: March 8, 20 I 0 REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION TITLE: MOTION TO CANCEL THE WHEAT RIDGE CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 22, 2010 o PUBLIC
HEARING [gJ BIDS/MOTIONS o RESOLUTIONS o ORDINANCES FOR I ST READING o ORDINANCES FOR 2 ND READING QUASI-JUDICIAL: 0 YES [gJ NO ~ ~ ~ 'fu-, \JQ.\' ,,\,\ City Clerk \ \ ) ISSUE: I There
are no items requiring the action of the Wheat Ridge City Council at the regularly scheduled meeting of March 22, 20 I O. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to cancel
the City Council meeting scheduled for March 22, 20 I O. Or, "I move to conduct the City Council of March 22, 2010 for the following reason(s) " REPORT PREPARED BY; Randy Young, City
Manager V:IFormsICA Ftemplate