Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/11/1973 MINUTES October 11, 1973 The two hundred and sixteenth regular meeting of the Wheat Ridge City Council was called to order at 7 35 p.m at 7390 West 38 Avenue by Mayor Albert E Anderson. Aldermen attending were Howard, Calvin Hulsey and later Dr Paul Abramson, Joseph Donaldson, Robert Ray Pepe Alderman Mary Jo Cavarra arrived Others attending were Mayor Anderson, City Clerk Louise F Turner, City Attorney Maurice Fox, staff personnel and interested citizens A portion of the Minutes of October 4, 1973 was read. Motion by Alderman Pepe "I move that the Clerk dispense with reading the remainder of the Minutes and that they be approved as written." Motion was seconded by Alderman Abramson and passed 5-0. Motion by Alderman Pepe "I move the reading of the Minutes of September 27, 1973 be dispensed with and that they be approved as written." Motion was seconded by Alderman Abramson and passed 5-0. MS-73-11 Minor Subdivision Case was heard. Glen Taylor, Acting Director of Public Works stated 1. Applicant was William Johnson, Donald Fields and Larry Jackson 2. 3. 4. 5. on April 16, 6. 41 Avenue in 7. Location was 41 Avenue and Nelson Street to Oak Street. Zoning was Residential-Three-A. Subdivision was called Wonder Vista. Preliminary Plat was approved by the Planning Commission 1973 becaust it met the criteria of the Ordinances. Final Plat was adjusted to show a 10 foot dedication along order to conform to the subdivision regulations The Board of Adjustment approved setback variances made necessary by the dedication. 8. The Greenbelt lies to the north of the subdivision and a verbal agreement had been drawn up to allow an easement through this property for access to the greenbelt. 9. $9,076.00 is in escrow for improvements adjacent to the property. 10. The final plat was approved unanimously by the Planning Commission on September 10, 1973 because it met all specifications for a minor subdivision and a variance had been granted by the Board of Adjustment on the street required by the subdivision regulations. In answer to questions, Mr. Tavlor said the second Planning Commission Hearing was required because the 10 foot dedication didn't show on the map, that three building permits had been issued prior to the passing of Ordinance No. 130, area had not been previously subdivided, that the area would drain to Clear Creek and that the easement agreement was not written Conrad Gardner, attorney representing the applicants stated 1. The whole procedure had been a "contractors' nightmare" beginning with a request in February. 2. Applicant had relied upon the staff and had done everything as directed 3. At time of final approval he was told a 50 foot street was required, this necessitated the entire redrafting and action by the Board of Adjustment. 4 Funds had been in escrow since February and the time had lapsed for escrow and no paving could be done at this time and final approval has not yet been granted. MINUTES - October 11, 1973 - Continued -2- 5. That the easement for access might be in exchange for the $75.00 per unit park requirement. 6. That sewer and water had been provided. Mayor Anderson said it had been a long time and he didn't know if the City had been completely at fault but that it would be proper to approve the plan as presented. No one appeared in opposition. City Attornev Fox said this case was handled under the same dedication language as one which sanitation districts had objected to a week before and if a problem arose a relinquishment could be one way to handle it. Motion by Alderman Abramson "I move that WS-73-11 a Minor Subdivision on 41 Avenue between Nelson and Oak be approved because the Planning Commission recommended approval and there was no opposition to the change." Motion was seconded by Alderman Pepe and passed 5-0. Mr. Gardner requested an extension on the escrow until July 1, 1974 City Attornev Fox said this should be clearly stated in the record that an extension was granted. Motion by Alderman Abramson "I move that in Case WS-73-11 the Council grant an extension of one year in the escrow account established for paving of 41 Avenue as required for subdivisions " City Attornev Fox asked for a stipulation that the extension of one year would also apply to the right of the City to proceed against the escrow fund M~ Gardner stated this was agreeable. Motion was seconded by Alderman Donaldson and passed 5-0 WZ-73-14 Rezoning Case was heard. Glen Taylor stated 1 Applicant - Applewood Village Shopping Center had requested a change from Restricted-Commercial-one to Restricted-Commercial 2 Location of the shopping center is 3400 Youngfield and request was for the area north of the Wool co Store 3. Area was approximately 1.213 acres and use would be for a garden center 4. Originally Restricted-Commercial had been requested for the entire Restricted-Commercial-one area along 38 Avenue. 5. There had been objections from adjacent and nearby property owners 6. Request had been amended at the Council Hearing on July 26, 1973 and sent back to the Planning Commission. 7 Present request was approved by the Planning Commission because the request complied with the Land Use Plan and because it was in conjunction with an agreement with the property owners which was binding and which specified use of the land and landscaping and screening A copy of the agreement is attached to the Minutes and is filed in the general file under "Applewood Village Shopping Center Agreement." In answer to a question, Mr Taylor stated this was a minor addition and the land didn't need to be subdivided. Conrad Gardner, attorney for 1. Mr. Becker was 2. That initially whole area to be uniform. 3. Neighbors had objected 4. Present request is for Restricted-Commercial on just the portion needed next to Woolco 5 That the agreement was legally binding and should be entered into the City's records 6 That the City was intended to be a party to the agreement "as a third party beneficiary." the applicant stated present. the request was for Commercial-One for the MII\IUTES - October 11, 1973 - Continued -3- City Attorney Fox stated that Mr Gardner's statement as to the agreement should be a part of the record. No one appeared in opposition. Motion by Alderman Hulsey "I move that Case WZ-73-14 be tabled for one week with a decision to be rendered at 7 30 p.m on October 18,1973." Motion was seconded by Alderman Donaldson and passed 5-0 WZ-73-21 Rezoning Case was heard. Mr. Tavlor stated 1 Applicants Gary Steffen and Hugh Bauer had requested a change from Residential-Three to Restricted-Commercial on 7.7 acres at 6275 West 38 Avenue 2. The case was not heard by the Council on July 13, 1973 and was rescheduled (because Mr. Bauer was not present.) 3. That property was rezoned by Jefferson County to Restricted- Commercial in September 1967, but the change was not entered on the map which was subsequently adopted by the City Showing Residential-Three for this piece. 4. 5. 6 7. 8. Land Use Plan shows commercial use Area is proper for light commercial use It is not in the Flood Plain. No additional ROW is needed. Planning Commission had recommended approval a It conformed with the Land Use Plan. b It did not constitute spot zoning c. It was not in the Flood Plain. No one appeared in opposition at the Planning because 9. Commission Hearing. Mayor Anderson asked if rezoning of the property would render a piece of property immediately to the north non-conforming. Robert Barr, representing the applicants, both of whom were present stated 1 There were two structures on the property to the north 2 Applicants didn't hold title to the land 3 It had been divided prior to the time they purchased it and prior to incorporation. 4. That the zoning approved in 1967 had not been put on the map which Wheat Ridge adopted. 5 A change from high density to commercial would reduce the governmental services needed, there would be no children in school. 6. 38 Avenue was a commercial street. 7. This was not extending strip zoning but filling a space within it 8. The existing rental units would be gradually rather than immediately connected. 9. Applicants bought the property as a piece that had already been separated from property to the north 10 It presently contains 6 units. 11. Some business uses had been put in following the rezoning and those still continue. 12 There are two buildings - a major and a minor one. No one appeared in favor or in opposition. Motion by Alderman Donaldson "I move that WZ-73-21 be tabled for one week for a decision to be made at that time." Motion was seconded by Alderman Abramson and passed 5-0. Resolution No. 248 pertaining to budget change was introduced by Alderman Abramson and read. Motion by Alderman Pepe "I move that Resolution 1\10. 248 introduced by Alderman Abramson be adopted" Motion was seconded by Alderman Hulsey and passed 5-0 MINUTES - October 11, 1973 - Continued -4- Motion by Alderman Donaldson "I move that the Planning Technician II be authorized full-time effective October 15, 1973 and adopt a budget change as necessary." Motion was seconded by Alderman Abramson and passed 5-0. Ordinance No 139 pertaining to the repeal of Ordinance No. 130 was introduced by Alderman Pepe and read. Alderman Pepe stated that he thought Ordinance No 130 should be repealed and that he hoped within a month and one half that the City would have a Planning Director. Alderman Howard stated it should not be repealed in its entirety. He said one person shouldn't have to put in curb and gutter when no one else had it, but the City needed to have controls on unsubdivided land. Otherwise a person could request a permit on 5 to 10 acres and the City would have to grant it. Alderman Cavarra stated that the public health, safety and welfare should be considered and that the restrictions should be kept for Residential- Three land, that failure to do so would encourage large numbers of units under one roof and that firefighting, drainage, ingress and egress and park dedications had to be considered. She said that on 3 acres, 63 units could all be under one roof and that the park dedication at $75.00 per unit would be considerable. In answer to Alderman Abramson, she said that only Residential-Three had that kind of impact. Mavor Anderson said if you subdivided, you could set the size of the lot. He added City business would be on the Agenda next week and the matter could be tabled to consider an Ordinance to amend Motion by Alderman Pepe "I move that Ordinance No. 139 be tabled for two weeks" Motion was seconded by Alderman Donaldson and passed 6-0. Mavor Anderson stated Alderman Cavarra's Ordinance to amend Ordinance No. 130 would be on the October 18, 1973 Agenda Ordinance No 140 setting the salary of the City Clerk at $275.00 per month and the City Treasurer's at $589.00 per month for 1974 was intro- duced by Alderman Howard and read. Motion by Alderman Pepe "I move that Ordinance No. 140 introduced by Alderman Howard be passed on first reading and be published and posted." Alderman Cavarra stated she would vote against the Ordinance because of the timing Alderman Hulsev agreed and added that he was not particularly opposed to a part-time Clerk, but the timing was bad. Alderman Abramson said such action might have been appropriate a month ago, but not now. In answer to a question from Alderman Pepe, City Attorney Fox said the Clerk's salary could be raised or dropped in the middle of the year and added affirmative action had to be taken before "the limit of the other Ordinance." In answer to a question from Alderman Hulsev as to whether another Ordinance could be introduced, Mayor Anderson said "not tonight." Question was called and Motion was defeated 4-2. Aldermen Abramson, Cavarra, Donaldson and Hulsey voted "nay." MINUTES - October 11, 1973 - Continued -5- Ordinance No. 137 pertaining to a City Administrator was brought up for second consideration and the title read. Motion by Alderman Pepe "I move that the title having been read, the Clerk dispense with reading the remainder of the Ordinance." Motion was seconded by Alderman Cavarra and passed 6-0. Alderman Abramson stated he was concerned that "We are attempting to delegate authority that is not ours to give" and that delegating Council authority and not being able to delegate mayorial authority could result in centralization of authority Motion by Alderman Howard "I move that Ordinance No. 137 be passed on second reading and be published and posted." Motion was seconded by Alderman Hulsey and passed 6-0. A relinquishment agreement read and discussed at the October 4, 1973 meeting came up for action. The agreement pertains to the Valley Water District, water and sewer lines in Fruitdale Valley Subdivision. Motion by Alderman Pepe "I viously read, be approved." and passed 6-0. move this relinquishment agreement, pre- Motion was seconded by Alderman Abramson City Attorney Fox stated the agreement was to be signed by the Mayor. A copy of the agreement is attached to the Minutes, and filed in the General File under "relinquishment agreement - Fruitdale Sanitation District" with cross reference under "Sanitation District - Fruitdale." Meeting was adjourned at 10 45 p.m. , Louise F. Turner City Clerk APPROVED L MINUTES - October 11, 1973 - Continued Page E, RELINQUISHMENT This Relinquishment executed by the City of Wheat Ridge, a municipal corporation, this (( )~ day of October, 1973, WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the owners of certain real property, subdivided and platted as Resubdivision of a Portion of Fruitdale Valley Subdivision, according to the recorded plat thereof in Plat Book 40 at Page 6 of the Jefferson County Records, dedicated in said plat to the use of the City of Wheat Ridge certain streets, roads, avenues, drives and easements, as shown on said plat, and providing . that all telephone and electric lines, works, poles, underground cables, gas pipelines, water pipelines, sanitary sewer lines, street lights, culverts, hydrants, drainag~ ditches and drains and all appurtenances thereto so con- structed or installed in the dedicated easements and rights of way when accepted by the City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, shall become the sole property of the said City of Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Resubdivision of a Portion of Fruitdale Valley Subdivision is served by Valley Water District, a quasi-municipal corporation, and Fruitdale Sanitation District, a quasi-municipal corporation, and WHEREAS, said Valley Water District and Fruitdale Sanitation District have installed or caused to be installed within the streets, roads, avenues and drives, easements and rights-of-way, shown and described on the plat of Resubdivision of a Portion of Fruitdale Valley Subdivision, water pipelines and sanitary sewer lines, respectively, and appurtenances thereto, and WHEREAS, the said water pipelines and appurtenances are the property of Valley Water District, and the sanitary sewer lines and mains are the property of Fruitdale Sanitation District, and WHEREAS, Wheat Ridge desires to relinquish and release any right, title and interest of the City of Wheat Ridge in and to said property of Valley Water District and property of Fruitdale Sanitation District : / , ~ '- flT:- - UctcJ-l~r 11,1(73 - i"l1riLrlUrd -7- AGREEMENT --------- -j THIS AGREEMENT, made and executed this ), " day /' of (//<(f" ~~ LEROY PIERCE, MEREDYTH PIERCE, DOROTHY A. POWELL, CHARLES , 1973, by and between A w KUETHER, A. POWELL, J. 1. CONNER, MARY E. CONNER, RALPH FERNALD, GEORGIA A. MITCHELL, W. MITCHELL, JR., ROSE M. RIGG, WILLIAM N. RIGG, JEAN BLANCHETT, CATHERINE C. BlANCHETT, ROGER E. MEYER, DOROTHY E. MEYER, JANET M. BUTTS, JOHN T. BUTTS, JR., THOMAS D. GARIN, JO ANN R. GARIN, JOHN L. ELIOTT, LAVON ELIOTT, GEANNE BREMMER, ROBERT H. BREMMER, LOIS E. PUMPHREY, LELAND L. PUMPHREY, HELEN C. SCIOLE, NORMA EKBERG, LEONARD EKBERG, WENDALL KREBS, MRS. ELI GONZALES, ELI M. GONZALES, JOSEPHINE SANTANGELO, RALPH SANTANGELO, hereinafter referred to as 1I0pponents and/or Protestors", and CONRAD BECKER, hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant". WIT N E SSE T H ---------- WHEREAS, there is now pending before the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge that certain application filed by the Applicant Conrad Becker for re-zoning and re- classification of that certain tract of real property more specifically described by Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, entitled Case No WZ 73-14, and WHEREAS, by virtue of the amended application for re-zoning and re-classifying by the Applicant, the Applicant is desirous of re-zoning and re-classifying a portion of that certain tract of real property generally known as / //7?- /)f "LlT~ - Uc '11 COl' 1]. ] '-T, - i"!Jr,t i IHJI,rl n _r _ Applewood Village Shopping Center, more specifically described by Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, being the legal description of such portion of the real property to be re-zoned from a Restricted Commercial-l classification to Restricted Commercial classification, to permit the installation and erection of a "garden shop" immediately adjacent to and immediately north of the existing structure and building now occupied by the Woolco Department Stores within such shopping center, and WHEREAS, the Opponents and Protestors hereinabove referred to have opposed and do oppose such amended re- zoning and re-classification application in that they are the owners of certain tracts of real property, located within the City of Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado, presently zoned as R-LA, being single family dwellings and located immediately adjacent to and immediately north of the real property which is the subject of such amended re-zoning application, and WHEREAS, all the parties hereto, being desirous of arriving at an amicable settlement of all matters in controversy between them with respect to such amended re- zoning application so as to permit said Applicant to erect and contruct such a "garden shop" and yet so as to preserve and protect the property values of the Opponents and Protestors and to buffer, screen or otherwise shield the real property owned by the Opponents and Protestors from the business operations and view of such garden shop, 2. /C/'/'7~ J/ ! I rh - fct j"r 11,1'7 - C~ rrti nUf?l _'1_ NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed and contracted between the parties hereto, in con- sideration for their mutual promises, actions and performances hereunder as follows. 1 That the Applicant shall further amend his application for re-zoning of Case No WZ 73-14 so as to remove from such application all of the real property located to the west of the western-most perimeter of the existing Woolco Department Store and extending in a westerly direction parallel to West 38th Avenue to Youngs field Street and in a northerly direction to West 38th Avenue, so as to leave remaining for consideration under such amended applica- tion for re-zoning that real property located from the western-most perimeter of the existing Woolco Department Store and extending in an easterly direction to the eastern-most perimeter of such real property and in a northerly direction from the northern perimeter of the existing Woolco Department Store in a northerly direction to West 38th Avenue. 2 That such amended application shall further recite that the re-zoning requested by the Applicant shall be for Restricted Commercial from the existing Restricted Commercial-I, as those classifications and re-zoning definitions are more specifically defined and enumerated by the Ordinances of the City of Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado 3 That the Applicant shall further purchase and install, at his own expense, immediately upon the execution 3 ('0: J~'9 ~v, f,) 1,/;/7'_ (.'C 11111 1 - ['rtrr "Or 11, 1 c-, ni I LJPd of this Agreement, trees of his own choosing, to be 'fNtS'> norther~perimeter of the property planted along the entire described in Exhibit A, being located along West 38th Avenue, of sufficient number, depth, kind and foliage so as to create an attractive barrier and buffer zone between the business operations of such "garden shop" and the single family dwellings (R-LA) of the Opponents located immediately to the north of West 38th Avenue along the northern-most perimeter of the property described in Exhibit A 4 That the Applicant shall erect upon such re- zoned parcel of land, a "garden shop" which shall be located immediately adjacent to the northern-most perimeter of the building now occupied by the Woolco Department Store and shall not extend in a northerly direction toward West 38th Avenue more than 75 feet from such boundary, nor more than 96 feet parallel to the northern-most perimeter of the said Woolco Department Store so as to create a "garden shop" with dimensions of not more than 75 feet by 96 feet immediately adjacent to the northern-most perimeter of the existing Woolco Department Store 5. That upon the erection of such "garden shop" at the location hereinabove described and within the dimensions hereinabove specified, the Applicant shall erect, at his own expense, along the northern-most perimeter of such "garden shop", an attractive, solid, wood fence of not less than six feet in height so as to further create a buffer and barrier between the operation 4 11::'/11/7.", I\.- [, T r [I T J - I C i-,! p r 1 1 ! I ""3 _ r (""1 n t. -i n Ll ('I -1Ii- and view of said "garden shop" and the single family dwellings presently owned by the Protestors and Opponents immediately to the north of West 38th Avenue. 6. For and in consideration for the promises, per- formances and actions of the Applicant, as hereinabove specified, the Opponents, by and through their counsel of record, Louis B. Bruno, shall appear at the City Council public hearing with respect to such amended application and shall formally present to the members of such City Council, this Agreement and shall make the same a part of the record of the hearing with respect thereto and shall withdraw any opposition by the signators to this Agreement to such amended application 7. It is expressly understood and agreed, by and between the parties, that this Contract and Agreement shall be binding upon all of the parties hereto and shall inure to the benefit of any of their heirs, successors, executors, administrators, transferees or assigns. ~~ /!b~ ~ ~-<-d Louis B Bruno Attorney for Opponents and Protestors ~ "----{ -'(t-~}":::; (J, I l~c..-h 'rl \ If\ ,y(~. :( Lr Conrad Becker, Applicant C" I~ " ( ~~"'''-'-:/\ E / J c~ ............., Conrad E Gardner Attorney for Applicant 5 7~ --:> "/ !! I ._ - !kG n b r! T' I!, I C) 3 - i Il n I, i n U 8 rl -11- ~~0J RO E H. RIGG -l{} ,(J,v" .::" ? -I' I I (',/J,... ;/ . < -<---<<W < / WILLIAM N. RIGG . ~ra t11/ / I 1 '/ / ;<:.-- /-< "-'1 / 'If:..;;; L,/ Ie if- 1 JEAN BLANCHETT ,/J ~~- ~ / f~(tf? / / l~~ , CATHERINE C. ~LANCHETT (~'4;~,~ q~ ~~_\-< ROGERJ~ MEYER k/ . J f? /1}-7 ,~, ! ~Ju:~l<..J/' (0. J, (A'.( 1.( J 'DOROTHY ~. MEYER ' (/ JANET M. BUTTS JOHN T. BUTTS, JR. CiA':::~ Jj JJ~~ THOMAS D. GARIN / (2 !r'~ / W?~ JOHN L. ELIOTT /;:~ ~LT6 C LAYON ELIOTT / 3y!JLj lllatL1/1t L{,4cdL I~'~ ~ ,,e / 0,";3 0 / -- ~[ ,/ c:J8 (JuJR(~/+T 0T UU4EltrRI DCTE GJ",'l " - I , iV'" ----?' '7 --7 ji' , I " f >', ~) _ L. t/'. IL.l _ /1 / 7-'? _ {. , " ;;" ,/ l - .....-: / , ( . --1._--.,.- r, .--_/-~,~..~- J I' ." _' ... '-'1M tJA#~ ?-~(>t7 ~ <B '6'13 CtJA-Jtt ll-. LrLP'-'cvf ~-CLL> , C~1-_ f d {}.5-J: J I (,I , ~ ! IA /1 lie-0\. /1- vJ/,,: /Lt- - I U /;'~ fj)!(JLC ;/()~ C&L4Jtcl6 ~!{'.33 , v, J ?- '> f / '11 57~~"2- . '2fIl~~1}~ )~~ j:Js'-.:17 Lv. ..set' -ti Duc~ . LJ)1/akd~." m&Y,k I /::;Si_--'- ,{ 7. i' i T ,! 1"1 - l! c n I r J 1, 1!7") - ! nr Ii: j I ill P rl -1 c,_ ~L~-<--,.v4A2- /7 'L--Y7ZC-i./ ./.::'OEANNE BREMMER 7&2 ' -- Y'i ':;-;;, , ,6/ /- . ~_ ,'~L,--/ LOIS E. PUMP~~ / ,Ju~ (? ~y~ HELEN C. SCIOLE S C/O L., NORMA EKBERG LEONARD EKBERG WENDALL KREBS " G'o/ " }\/\"j/1.' ex,\ j , MRS. ELI GONZALES t~ I / ""')3 /_..) /;) /lJ ~ /~R to D 7 YJ- ,:J,f - /S 1 g] C ') /t /.r 0____ -~ChU Cd:" U / / J P7 -- 7'} }. ) :{ b c 7 U. ~);Y '- LJe d/ )/tt; iZ (~L (7 (~~~) I /,2./ r/ 7 ),/ / ,? rr-~;{ p:...iu . /I~/;L;;;Z/~,c/ (?~ -- '/~ / /,;7/ '77 //---:.-:::; ff -/ J~2( :-<>. 1/:I,;:7:/,.; !V~5 L-, (j~ 31 It) M~__41 dA , I h~ qA' e~?Cl033 8 ] !:I i [' ] - let IJ IJ pr 1], 1 j 7 -z, - I lilt. i n U 10 ri -17,- /~~~~ /' J / 1l ~C;:[ C( ~Jt&~L) 1\ () //1\ \ /) '\: ",-, ( I X- '::7 ~ L:-]./!/Z ~_t,-, 't..- .ir (-...r-, /", t'(I 7 '>- (t/'~' .. .t v ? ~ / '- -- /0 - '- v L, A ; J' ~ -/ \.:.: c '(j , CL/~ Q --;K{j( ~~ A/t~ ,~ ~ a:'L.!f:~ r -". ' . fi ~-1c?/c2. a 772~~0 -~v -- ~~~' ~~~~~ ~". / ! -//~0 //_>>~V~'L ~ 1:</./L--J'/ \l'C~ ;/ ~ /\<:' ~ . T, -/- ~ .~~.~ ->-- / ) / I / ( /1 :..-- ;/.- /"'/_;:-t> j (/ / // /"') ~l /3 3?rocj -?/~/--f!/' :J ;; 6 9' ~-v /~j;-/"--4/f Qp- 1 (/1 ;:) Y ~ ~ l/,.r./~<--</ Cu'7--~ .~ V .-, T1! CI .j /7~ ~) rJ_~ ~ ). / /ul__j ? CI:'~ CZ/- 313 ~ LJ ~{L~ 0-t 3 '13;:L-1 L,d(c/J~ 3f7C7:2 c:0-"-I'-/r/ iLl 38 {)c2 ?O~r!' & .JP-2/ ~~C?j I 1/-?~ ~ X','l..~/. -- I - ;/ ~ j~ 'f/--z:' vc'~ - - '3'1> ~\ lJ ~ ~"t -1/ I A __ I/o( .,.Li /--- -- Y'f"':...;...,I./ " r/ I :: (<j1 ~ ~/ "-~ 1.1 r I " // / 7 ~ ~ /~f , I i' iT - I C l:oi If'r 11, 1'~7'" - Lnnt i rllJ8rl _]1+- EXHIBIT A A portion of NE~ NW~ Sec. 29, T 3 S, R 69 W, 6th PM., County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows Commencing at the SW corner of NE~ NW~ said See 29, thence N 89027 6' 'E along the S line of said NE~ NW~, a distance of 60 0 feet to a point on the Ely line of Young- field Street; thence N 0051 8' W along the Ely line of Young- field Street, a distance of 425 0 ~eet to a point, which point is the true point of beginning; thence N 89027 6' E parallel with the S line of NE~ NW~ of said See 29, 825 0 feet more or less to a point on the W line of Ridgeview Acres, Third Filing; thence N 0044 I' W along the W line of said Ridgeview Acres, Third Filing, a distance of 245 00 feet more or less to a point on the Sly line of West 38thlAvenue; thence S 76034' W along the Sly line of said West 38th Avenue a distance of 846 0 feet more or less to a point on the Ely line of Youngfield Street extended; thence S 0051 8' E along the Ely line of said Young- field Street and the Ely line of Youngfield Street extended a distance of 50.0 feet more or less 'to the true point of beginning, except any portions thereof lying within said West 38th Avenue and said Youngfield Street. --,......~.,......~. -~-.,..~..--.~._-_.. ---'" ---'''-''' ._.,.~.....----... , L-~ / // / 1 ~ ./ ...' ~ TI"1 T - i [' 1.1 JPr II F!73 - I [![Ii ill! 8rl -F"- o .. I- t! '.. IU ~ - l!J a : ~ ~ ~~] ~ Ii Z ~ .J ........- D. ~~ ~ ~ ~ < If) ~ a 3 I- ~ ~ 0 \l)uJ~~ ~~02~ ~:sUo F CIl:' % I \.10<( ... ... (41 U Z tIJ l.L 9 o ~ l\J fi .)) ~ 8 :3 rt1 r- ~ . tit ~ g ~ :: ~ ~ g} 1:. 0 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ tJ n.. ! C! j:S~ ~ Ul ._ <( 1.L ~ 3 Z z 0313 ill n- Ul uJ \f't U- ;: ~~ Qt Z 0 -r \1 ~:€ ~ W a ~ z {l~ f! ~ W <( - \J ~-... a ~CsC :111)..9 lIS l!J \f) t--(J"' t ~ v ~ ~ W IJ. ~ ~ u. .J _ u1 0 Q! 0 t t- ~ ~~ ~ 8 & I - Z - ~ b ~ - ~et: 1:; 0 Cill. 0. ~ Z. "'-J '0 <{ " rn W ~ u t. 0 ul - j - :r uJ t!! - ~ rIl ~ ~ "- ::c . ~ f'I 3