HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution-1970-0058
RESOLUTI ON NO.
?
"5 c-~
WHEREAS, a certain piece of real property located at
the intersection of 29th Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard, in
Jefferson County, City of Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado, commonly
referred to as the Olinger Estate was zoned R-2, and
WHEREAS, the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners
rezoned the above described property on or about the 5th day of
August, 1969, to restricted commercial (RC-l), and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Court action in the District Court,
in and for the County of Jefferson, State of Colorado, Civil Action
No. 33746, the District Court found that the County Commissioners
had abused their discretion in rezoning the above described piece of
1 and, and
WHEREAS, the Court ordered the City of Wheat Ridge to take
the appropriate action necessary to rezone the subject property to
residential uses, to wit: R-2
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Wheat Ridge,
State of Colorado, does hereby, pursuant to Court Order, rezone that
certain piece of real property located at the intersection of 29th
Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard, in Jefferson County, City of Wheat
Ridge, State of Colorado, commonly referred to as the Olinger Estate,
and more specifically referred to as follows: The West Half of Lot 3,
Block 1, Barth's Subdivision, County of Jefferson, State of Colorado,
to residential 2 (R-2).
.-.-
DONE AND RESOLVED, this (Ft'-day of April, A.D. 1970, by
a vote of
Co
to
c
jjl~cf [ r;~DLJIh
ALBERT E. ANDERSON, MAYOR.
ATTEST:
,,---,' -----' ~
;/' I~Y, '""' - _.../ /' ') ~ ,
_ I.. ~ _ .J.--(... / . /_ L _ --7 .. t: "---___
Louise F. Turner,~City Clerk.
;f")FS?'T')-r (.))
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON
AND STATE OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 33746
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
GEORGE H. FENTRESS, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COI-1MISSIONERS
OF THE COUNTY OF JEFFERSON, STATE
OF COLORADO, et al.,
OF LAW,
AND ORDERS
Defendants
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
THIS MATTER having come on for trial this 31st day of
March, 1970, the plaintiffs being represented by George C. Aucoin,
attorney at law, the defendant Board of County Commissioners and
Robert Jackson being represented by Leonard L. Liss, County Attorney,
and the defendant City of Wheat Ridge being represented by Maurice
Fox and Henry Nieto, attorneys at law, and the court, after consider-
ing the evidence and hearing statements of counsel, doth order, adjudge
and decree as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
The court finds that this action in declaratory judgment
involves the rezoning of certain real property located at the inter-
section of West 29th Avenue and Wadsworth Boulevard in Jefferson
County, City of Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado, which has been
formerly called and referred to as the Olinger Estate.
The court finds that upon application for rezoning the
Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners did in fact have
jurisdiction to rezone the subject property because it was located
/c~s p- ~ c Ci)
ln the unincorporated area of Jefferson County.
The court further finds that during the pendency of this
particular zoning application, the citizens of the City of Wheat
Ridge voted to become an incorporated city; and further, the court
finds that the Board of County Commissioners continued to accept
jurisdiction and process the applications and in fact on or about
August 5, 1969, did rezone said subject property from Residential
2 (R-2) zone district to Restricted Commercial (RC-l) district.
The court finds further that said rezoning became effective
on or about August 5, 1969, which was approximately seven days prior
to the swearing in of the mayor and other officials of the City of
Wheat Ridge, State of Colorado.
Further, the court finds that the subject property was
zoned Residential 2 (R-2) for low density residential uses sometirre
on or about 1946 pursuant to the original zoning plan for Jefferson
County.
The court finds that in 1960 or 1961 the Jefferson County
Commissioners, pursuant to a comprehensive study, adopted a Master
Plan for the orderly development of the county and community and that
this Master Plan specified that there would be Residential 2 (R-2)
zoning for this immediate area surrounding the subject property
Further, Jefferson County continued to study and update
its Master Plan, and this updated study for the Master Plan further
called for Residential 2 (R-2) zoning for this area.
The court finds that subsequent to this rezoning change a
building permit was issued to the landowners which was promptly acted
upon by the landoNners in question.
The landowners were not made a
party to this suit, and the court has no jurisdiction over these
owners.
The court further finds that plaintiffs are neighbors and
abutting property owners and are citizens of the City of Wheat Ridge,
-2-
"" /)
/2~'''' ~-? l <-I
County of Jefferson, and have a vested right to enJoy the heretofore
announced residential zoning which was adopted in their respective
neighborhood, as specified by the Master Plan
Further, the court finds that the only question before it
is whether or not there was a constitutional exercise of the zoning
powers by the Boal
of County Commissioners, and in order for this
rezoning change to be constitutional and legal it must bear some
reasonable relationship to the plan for the orderly development of
the community, or in this case the comprehensive plan.
The court in determining this question refers to a resolu-
tion passed by the Jefferson County Board of County Commissioners on
or about August 5, 1969, whereby the County Commissioners in Case
No. B69-56 rezoned the subject property as previously stated.
The court notes that the resolution states there has been
a large increase in traffic along Wadsworth Boulevard; that there
has been only a few residential building permits issued along Wads-
worth Boulevard; and that commercial zoning amounts to the best
economic use of the subject property,
For these reasons the County
Commissioners changed the zoning from residential to commercial.
The court finds these reasons were not in conformity with
the evidence presented to the County Commissioners, and their action
was therefore arbitrary and capricious and not in the best interests
of the community.
The court further finds that the Board of County Commissioners
did not follow the recommendations of the County Planning Commission
and the advice of the County Planning Director, Mr. Gary Latham to
keep this area residential, which evidence was presented to them at
the rezoning hearing.
Further, the court finds that said rezoning wJuld depreciate
and devalue the plaintiffs' properties because said rezoning would
change the character of the neighborhood from residential to
-3-
ve-i <, c:rr S~y cs- j
commercial, which is not in conformity with the comprehensive plan
,
for the development of the community.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND JUDGMENT
The court concludes as a matter of law that the rezonlng
was an unconstitutional exercise of the zoning powers by the Board
of County Commissioners of Jefferson County, because such rezoning
would constitute "spot zoning" which has no relationship to the
Master Plan and therefore would not be in the best interests of the
general public health, safety, and welfare.
Additionally, the court finds and concludes that the City
of Wheat Ridge adopted the Zoning Regulations, the zoning maps and
existing zoning of Jefferson County without its own study or plan for
the orderly development of the City of Wheat Ridge.
Therefore, the
City accepted the bad zoning along with the good and should be re-
quired to reinstate the original zoning of R-2.
THE COURT ORDERS that the City of Wheat Ridge take appro-
priate action with all convenient speed to rezone the subject prop-
erty for residential uses, R-2, subject to the property rights vested
in the landowner by the issuance of the building permit heretofore
mentioned.
The Board of County Commissioners and Robert Jackson, Chief
Building Inspector are dismissed from this action because the subject
property lS now under the zoning jurisdiction of the City of Wheat Ridge.
Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.
DONE in open court this 8th day of April, nunc pro tunc
April 1, 1970.
BY THE COURT:
~'I '1 / ! --
/-0 - ,/ Iv _ -'<J r
L/_'(l--:'lJ_Cc'l ,./. ~ ~. - I
Ronald J. Hardesty
Judge
-4-