HomeMy WebLinkAbout10/20/1975
f-lINUTES
Octooer dJ,
LJn
I flC: thnE hUlldl'ed drlD decond regular
City Council was called to order by
at 4_:0::> I ield Street.
meeting or the Wheat Ridge
Mayor Roesener at 7 4U p.m
An Lxecutive Session had been held prior to the regular meeting.
Councilmen present were Mary 00 Lavarra, Joseph Donaldson, Robert
Howard, Calvin Hulsey, Larry Mer~l and Louise Turner.
Also attending were City Administrator John Jerman, City Attorney
Maurice Fox, City Clerk Elise Brougham, staff and interested citizens.
Motion by Councilman Merkl
any tJlinutes this evening."
and passed 5-1. Councilman
"I move that no action be taken on
Motion was seconded by Councilman Dona Ids or
Turner voted "nay."
City Treasurer James Malone gave his Budget and Appropriations Report
for the month of September ,975. He stated the projection on the
anticipated revenue is short $58,000 and the fund balance should
be short $31,810 totalling $90,000~PP~~X~tated he wanted Council
to be aware that the anticipated revenue from Revenue Sharing will
be short by $13,564 but encumbrances have been made against the
total projected revenue in this fund so the difference will have to
be made up. Mr. Jerman explained one reason why this is off is that
the income from interest was made prior to purchase of the police
building wnich depleted the fund.
Resolu tion ,,0. 417 authorizing transfer of invested funds in a Cof D
to the general fund was introduced by Councilman Donaldson and was read.
Motion by Councilman Donaldson "I move for the adoption of Resolutiofl
-;0. 417." Motion was seconded by CO'_Jncilman Hulsey and passed 6-0.
Public Comment was made by
Mike \'illano, attorney of 4315 Wadsworth who stated he had a
liquor application filed but it had been too late to place it on
tonight's agenda for a Preliminary Hearing and asked Council if they
would consider it tonight so that a hearh~~ ~ate could be set and
a boundary. The application is for Wheat ~~aza Partnership - Gordon
E. Phiefer, Eugene C. Smaldone and James H. Erfurdt dba Super 30wl
at 7700 W. 38 Avenue for a Class ~ liquor license.
Motion by Councilman Hulsey "I move that a Public Hearing be set
for November 24th, ~975 of the Wheat Ridge Plaza Partnership
(for a Class 3 liquor license located at 7700 W. 38 Avenue) and
that a boundary be set at 1 mile radius." Motion was seconded by
Councilman Donaldson and passed 6-0.
Case WZ-75-13 a rezoning request by Glen M. Walsh at 7005 West 44 Avenue
from Residential-Two to Restricted-Commercial-One was scheduled
Dennis Zwaqerman, Director of Community Development stated the
Land Use Plan is low density residential and the Planning Departmenr
and Planning Commission recommended denial. He did state that
the attorney for the applicant wanted to have a continuance of the
case
Carol VanPelt, attorney for the applicant stated at the Planning
Commission she had requested notification of the hearing date and
had been told she would receive it, but did not. The applicant
received their notification on Saturday. She stated she wanted a delay
so that she could properly prepare the case and have certain people
testify who she could not get on such short notice.
Councilman Merkl asked if
tJlr Zwagerman slated "yes."
also. City Attornev (OX
if requested and at that
why the change is valid.
the property waH properly posted and
Councilman Hulsev stated it was published
suggested that the continuance be given
time of hearing the applicant must show
MINUTES - 10/20/75 - Continued
-2-
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move we continue the hearing (ON Case
WZ-75--11mtil November 17, 1975." Motion was seconded by Carncilman
Turner and TIED 3-3. Councilmen Hulsey, Donaldson and Howard voted
"nay." Mayor Roesener voted "aye" and MOTION PASSED 4-3.
Several citizens had been in the audience tn hear the rezoning case
with petitions, and they were told their petitions would be valid
and to come back on November 17, 1975. Mr. Zwagerman stated the
property would be reposted but not republished.
Case WS-75-05 Applewood ~nolls 12th filing subdivision by Ralph Jacobson
at West 32 Avenue and Quail Street under present zoning of Residential-
One was scheduled.
Mr. Zwaqerman stated the preliminary plat shows 6 lots with the
south lot 748'. He stated there was a review from forrest Smith
of the Public Works Dept. stating need for the following requirements
1. Development Agreement for curb, gutter and sidewalk.
2 Certification that all drainage will follow the natural drainage
flow
3. Information from the engineer concerning detention ponds of
Lots 1-5. They need to be reviewed by the EngineeringDspt. and the
City Engineer.
4 Show the cuI-de-sac as two different tracts. Tracts A
and 3, so they can be vacated at the time the street is extended
toward W. 38 Ave., if it comes into being.
5. Show drainage easements across Lot 6 for the two drainage
pipes coming into the property and also a drainage easement for the
large drainage channel across Lot 6.
6. It was brought to our attention the City of Lakewood is
proposing a 36" R.C.P. pipe to be ifEtalled at the southeast corner of
the property. This pipe is a drainage pipe and we should have more
information concerning the additional runoff coming from this proposed
pipe.
He stated the Planning Commission waived the curb and gutter
requirement and approved the plat.
Councilman Cavarra stated it appeared there were numerous questions
pending and questioned if there would be parkland dedication.
Mr. Zwaqerman stated he felt it was most appropriate to request money
in lieu of parkland.
Councilman Cavarra asked if the Lena Gulch Report had been reviewed
and the luright McLaughlin Engineers had been consulted, and that
there is the possibility of easements for a walkway along the Gulch
Mr. Zwagerman stated they had not been consulted.
Councilman Cavarra stated there was discussion of a walk easement
to the school from the west along W. 33rd at one time and was this
considered. Mr. Zwaqerman stated "no." Councilman Turner stated
she knew there was a letter from the R-1 School district recommending
a walkway along W. 33 Ave. but was not in the packet. Councilman Hulsev
stated at the time the letter was written the park plan had not
been adopted and all the facts were not known. Mr. Zwagerman
obtained copies of the letter and stated the projected enrollment
and there was a walkway recommendation along W. 33 Ave. The
letter was dated 6/3/73. Councilman Turner stated that there
should be current communications.
Councilman Hulsev objected to no curb and gutter in the area and
stated the area already has it established. Mr. Zwaqerman stated
there is a possibility that Quail will flever be extended and will
endwith a cuI de sac with a maximum of 6 homes. He stated there is
no home for 748' of open field and the curb would 'stick up" above
the ground. He stated the topographic character of the subdivision
does not lend itself to curb.
In answer to
ROWand that
road and cuI
like to see
a question he stated there is less than 50' existing
the fire department has not recommended extending the
de sac any further. Councilman Merkl st.ated he would
dedication on the street extended
MINUTE5 - 10/20/75 - Continued
-3-
Councilmdll TUTller ::itcHed there is :-iteejJ slope right above
the flood plain which flow6 onto ttJis property and the property
in qU86tion both contribute to the runoff into Lena Gulch. Consequently,
the less imperviou6 material such as paving and curb and gutter !he
better it is. She stated the plan leaves the massive drainage
area from Lakewood wide open and she recommended that there be
park dedication instead of requesting from the developer.
She stated that in the future when there is land in question
with close proximity to Lena Gulch that information from Wright
McLaughlin be obtained and that she had called the engineering
firm herself and that they requested a retention pond on the
north lot for runoff from 6 building sites and rhe street.
. north
Counc~lman Cavarra asked how dose the 'west corner of the
property was to Lena Gulch. Mr. Zwaqerman stated 100' to 250'
Councilman Turner stated 12'. Later in the discussion Emmett Lane
engineer for the applicant stated it was 60'. Mr. Jacobson said 200~
Ralph Jacobson owner of the property stated he had owned it 3 years.
He stated since there are 95' or more fiontages he felt curb and
gutter was not necessary. He stated the sites are larger to
allow horses. He mentioned that Lakewood had increased the runoff
but did not recognize liability. He stated the agreement that homeowners
would sign would be if curb and gutter was required later the
cost would be paid out of a 10 year plan.
Councilman Merkl stated he felt the catch basin at the end of the
cuI de sac could get filled with dirt with no curb and gutter.
Councilman Turner stated if the lots had been left as acreages no curb
is required, and an open f~d absorbs more moisture than a tight lawn.
Emmett Lane, Engineer for the applicant stated curb and gutter was
discussed at the catch basin and they proposed curb and gutter on
the north end of the cuI de sac for that purpose and to block the
street also. He stated if it was all curb and gutter the erosion
problem would far outbalance the other problems. There would be an
asphalt gutter on the west side. Councilman Turner asked if the
asphalt curb would be on lots 2-5 and he said "no" because the
water does not flow westerly. He stated there would be 3000 sw. ~
of water increase. He stated the proportion of excess runoff is minor
compared to total runoff that will occur and there will be detention
ponds of the lots if practical. Councilman Turner stated due to the
large runoff now, there should be absolutely no runoff from Mr
Jacobson's property that is increased
In answer to a question, City Attornev Fox stated the curb and up
gutter agreement could be placed on the plat which would be picked~in
the title He stated the development agreement could be used also.
Mayor Roesener read one letter of opposition from lrrestine Williams
at 11100 W. 38 Avenue which stated no development should occur until
after the flood plain has been corrected.
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move that Case W5-75-05 be approved
and acceptance of the Preliminary Plat for the following reasons
1. It was recommended by the Planning Department.
2. It was recommended by the Planning Commission.
3. It is an improvement over existing conditions.
4. The subdivision meets all ordinance requirements except
for curb and gutter which I would like to see adevelopment agreement worked
out on this matter.
5. And that this approval be gi~nproviding that the six
points raised in the memo from Mr. Forrest Smith dated 10/20/75
are resolved." Motion was seconded by Councilman Hulsey and passed 5-1.
Councilman Turner voted "nay." The Memo is attached to the Minutes.
MINUTES - 10/20/75 - Continued
-4-
A Master Plan for the Extraction of Sand and Gravel was scheduled for
action by Council.
rran_k Call_aha,~ of 7020 W. 38 Avenue stated he did not oppose the
concepr of a master plan but was concerned about the procedure
and how the land could be reclaimed He stated it was expensive
to reclaim the land and questioned where the ground water would flow
north of W. 44 Avenue. He stated ~ime is very expensive to the
gravel i-dustry and developers and they want to know how to proceed.
CouncillTl f'ieT.g all these questions would be studied to see if
it. i, 1e sible [;0 extract the gravel. Councilman Hulsey stated this
is 8 guideline which was required of HB 1529. Councilman Turner
stated that there should be a time limit put in for when the
applicants come to Council for approval.
Dennis Zwaqerman stated the developer has a time limitation
with bonding required for backfilling, and if it isn't done the bond
can be used for this purpose. Councilman Cavarra stated that solid
waste and sanitary landfill is a possibility for land reclamation.
She stateo she was hesitant to adopt the plan since it has the wording
that a developer can say it is unfeasible to mine and then not have
to extract the gravel.
Councilmsn Merkl and riulsey felt the burden was on the developer
to reclaim the land.
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move for the adoption of the
Plan for Extraction of Sand and Gravel Resources dated u e
and prepared by the Department of Community Developme'11."
was seconded by Councilman Hulsey.
Elster
175
otior
Motion to Amend by Councilman Turner "I move thRt 0'1 page 12.
with the sentence beginning 'This procedure shall be followed' be
changed to 'This procedure shall be followed, if the steps numbeuD
1,2, and 3. which follow, apply. ," Motion was seconded by Councilman
Merkl and passed 5-0.
Question was called on Amended Motion and passed 6-0.
!iotion by Councilman Merkl "I would like to move that the meeting
not continue past 11 30 p.m. this evening, and we handle on the
Agenda the ordinances and resolutions, Items 4.8.2, and 3 and
4.C.1 with these last items first. Resolution 3.B first and 3.A
next and the others as they appear on the Agenda." Motion was
seconded by Councilman Cavarra and passed 5-1. Councilman Turner
voted "nay."
Plans from Binder Construction Co. for reconstruction of the bridge
at W. 35 Avenue and Jay were considered. Clyde Hobbs, Director of
Public Works stated he had a letter from the State Dept. of Highways,
Department of Bridges stating their opinion of Mr. Binder's design
and which objected to some of the design. The letter is attached
to the [vlinutes.
Councilman Cavarra asked if Mr. Binder's design was close to what
'had been there before, and if it was within the contract to force him
to replace above of what was there originally. Mr. Hob~~ stated
Mr. Binder's design was comparable to what was there.
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move we direct Mr. Hobbs and Mr. Fox
to meet with Mr. Binder (of Binder Construction) to negotiRte on
the recommendations of the Colorado State Department of Highways pursuant
to the let1er from them." Motion was eEconded by Councilman Donaldson
and passed 6-0.
MINUTES - 10/20/75 - Continued
-5-
Mr. Jerman announced that the Sign Code Revision Committee had been
formed. Councilman Merkl stated he knew billboards had been left
out of the 2 year time extension given to other non-conforming
signs and stated he wanted them included.
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move that the Community Develo~ Dept. brirg i'llo
our next regular meeting an oridnance amendment to allow all legal non-
conforming signs in the City to have a 2 year extension." i"lotion
was seconded by Councilman Hulsey and passed 5-1. Councilman
Cavarra voted "nay."
Report from the City Attorney regarding i"lr. Jim Britton's claim against
the City at 3612 Garland Street pertaining to damage of his property
due to the stree~ grade was scheduled. In conclusion it stated
that the City has suffered no liability in the matter and therefore
does not need to compensate Mr. Britton. The opinion is att2ched
to the Minutes. Mr. Fox stated the grade of the street is within
1/10 of a foot as specified on the plans. The city inspection
is for the safeguard of the community as a whole and the roadway is
designed to be safe. He stated Mr. Archer, the contractor put in a
retaining wall with Mr. Britton's knowledge and the city doesn't
establish grades and the developer put in the road. He stated Mr.
Bri tton does have a means of getting into his property and was not
prohibited from reaching his property.
IVlotion by Councilman Cavarra "I move that the city negotiate wi th
Mr. Britton on the grounds of moral responsibility for a settlement
not to exceed $1,000 contingent upon determination of a proper
account number." Motion was seconded by Councilman Turner.
Discussion followed. Mr. Britton sta~ed the retaining wall is
on the city ROWand not on his property and he did not negotiate
with Mr. Archer on it. He stated Mr. Archer stated the city requested
that the original plans be changed on the grade. Holland St. is
higher that Garrison St. The former Director of Public Works, bIen
Taylor told him the street was not properly designed and that his
ground should have been considered.
Question was called on the MOTION by Councilman Cavarra and WAS DEFEATED
4.'J i~ouncilm8n Hulsey, Merkl, Donaldson and Howard voted "nay."
iot~_[J.T}_ by Councilman Merkl "I move that the list of election judges
be approved as received from Jefferson County." Motion was seconded
by Councilman Donaldson and passed 6-0. The list is attached to the
fVlinutes.
Resolution ~o. 418 stating objections to the proposed increase in
the mill levy by the R-1 School District Wffi introduced by Councilman
Merkl and was read.
Motion by Councilman Turner "I move for the adoption of Resolution
~o. 418." Motion was seconded by Councilman Donaldson and passed 6-0.
Motion by COUBilman Merkl
hear a report from the City
Howard and passed 6-0.
"I move we deviate from the Agenda to
Attorney." Motion was seconded by Councilman
City Attornev Fox stated he had 2 resolutions for condemnation of
land-'by eminent domain for park purposes. He stated these properties
have prospective purchasers. He also stated he had met with the
Open Space Committee representative, Ray Printz pertaining to the
recent approval of Council to purchase the Bossick pro~ty with
Lakewood and the County and that there had been erroneous informati~n
pertaining to the acquisition of water rights which are in actuality
on a lease hold basis. There is discussion for an intergovernmental
agreement for maintenance of the property also.
Resolution No. 419 was irtroduced by Cou,cilman Merkl authorizing
condemnation of land at W. 27 Ave. and Benton owned by the Hart Estate
and was read.
MINUTES - 10/20/75 - Continued
-6-
Counc~l~an Merkl stated he would like to see withdrawal of the Resolution
pertalnlng to the.Bossick property. He stated he felt the Hart
Estate was very lmportant and the "City should go all out, and do
whatever we have to do to obtain that one portion of property."
He stated regarding the property at W. 29 and Wadsworth "I don t
know about i-hat because some of the talk on that was Lakewood and
the County also participating in that at one time because of its
~lose~es~ to Lakewood! I'd heard some, talk that Lakewood was interested
ln thlS. He stated ln one presentatlon this was mentioned.
He stated, "~ don't really like the idea of condemning property for
parks, buT, ln the area of the Hart Estate, I think it's quite
necessary. On the area of 29th and Wadsworth, I'm not all that sure
it is."
Mr. Jerman stated regarding the Hayward property (W 29th and Wadsworth)
that tm Beth Eden Church is pressing very hard to acquire it and
"they call almost daily and their offer is a good $30,000 more than
the City's offer plus a 9% interest on the 5 year contract." He
stated if the City is interested the only way to acquire the land
is by condemnation.
Councilman Hulsev asked if the land was zoned for Beth Edens use.
City Attornev Fox stated residential property can be used for church
purposes. Councilman Hulsev stated church property pays no tax.
Mavor Roesener stated he dislikes condemnation also but "there are
times when it's needed." He statD regarding the 29th Ave. and
Wadsworth property there is no park in the area other than a small ball diamond
at 29th and Newland, and also there is no park property at the Hart
Estate location.
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move for the adoption of Resolution
No. 419." Motion was seconded by Councilman Donaldson and passed
5-1. Councilman Turner voted "nay", Councilman Cavarra voted "aye",
Councilman Donaldson voted "aye", Councilman Howard voted "aye",
Councilman Hulsey voted "aye", and Councilman Merkl voted "aye".
Resolution No. 420 authorizing condemnation of land at W. 26 Avenue
and Wadsworth Blvd. was introduced by Councilman Merkl and was read.
This land is owned by Frank Hayward.
Motion by Councilman Hulsey "I move to amend the description of
the property t read 'Between W. 26 Avenue and W. 29 Ave. and Wadsworth.'"
Motion was seconded by Councilman Merkl and passed 5-1. Councilman
Cavarra voted "nay."
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move for adoption of Resolution r~o. 420."
Motion was seconded by Councilman Donaldson
Councilman Howard asked if there were enough funds to acquire these
2 parcels of ground in the Open Space Fund. City Attornev Fox
stated Mr. Horton had informed him that there is enough money.
He stated action will not be taken until a second resolution from
the Commissioners is passed.
Councilman Turner stated she was opposed to the Resolution because
she felt it was improper to condemn land for park purposes.
Question was called on the adoption of Resolution No. 420 and TIED 3-3.
Councilman Donaldson voted "aye",
Councilman Hulsey voted "aye", Councilman Howard voted "nay",
Councilman Merkl voted "aye", Councilman Turner voted "nay",
and Councilman Cavarra voted "nay." Mayor Roesener voted "aye"
and MOTION PASSED 4-3.
City Attornev Fox stated Resolution No. 400 authorizing the purchase
of Lots 16 and 19 in Fruitdale Valley Subdivision for $15,750 and
the appraisal is $19,500. Mr. Jerman stated the owner had incurred
expenses several months ago making the cost higher.
sta~.ed he ichough t, the price had been set "in black
Councilman Hulsev - '
f'l.!.n~ TES - 10/20/75 - COilt1nued
-7-
and White" and wondered what happened.
Mr. Jer_m.5.l!l. sf-ated Mr. Callahan had put in some improveme!"ts. He
stated there is an appraisal from the Open Space Committee and
ir came in at $~9,500.
Councilmar Merkl stated Mr. Callahan accepted the previous price
through a 0-erbal contract. Ci tv At tornev Fox s ta ted verbal contrac+s
are not binding. Mr. Jerman read the Minutes of 5/27/75 authorizing
the original price providing it was acceptable to the Open Space
Committee and if it was not that Lot 19 be given priority.
Councilman Huls~JL stated Mr. Callahan wrote a lelter to Ihe City
setting the original price. Mavor Roesener felt @4,OOO ir crease
was excessive. Councilman Merkl suggested just buying one of the lots,
Lot 19 for $8,500.
Q~~ni~Zwaqerman stated the difference in the price has to do with
escrow monies that are in for curb, gutter and sidewalk. Mavor Roesener
stated escrow is refunded when improvements are put in.
City Attornev rCo,>:. is to look into the matter to see if the owner,
Mr. Frank Callahan is committed to the previous price and what
exactly h, transpired since the Resolution.
Councilman Turner stated due to recent zoning amendments a double
could be built on one of the lots where it previously could not be.
Meeting was adjourned at 11 35 p.m.
APPROVED
I J, .~~ /7 ",- '"'If~/3
r
Page 7 Minutes Oct. 20
Sri j - Cities and Towns
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
CHAS E, SHUMATE
G
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
-- -...
'\
Bridge File 12-00-00
COLORADO STATE PATROL
COL. C WAYNE KEITH
CHIEF
rATE OF COLORADO
01\ ISION OF HIGHWAYS
E. N HAASE
CHIEF ENGINEER
t
I
['
4201 EAST ARKANSAS AvENUE DENVER COLORADO 80222 (303) 7579011
October 20, 1975
Mr Clyde E Hobbs
Director of Public Works
City of Wheat Ridge
11220 W 45th Avenue
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
Dear Mr Hobbs
We have reviewed the attached details
a concrete box culvert at W 34th Ave
the proposed details
for the proposed replacement of a portion of
and Jay St Following are some comments on
Compared to our Standard Concrete Sox Culvert details the thickness
of the slab and the size of reinforcing appears to be inadequate for
a 12 foot clear span box However, our standard boxes are designed
for HS 20-44 loading There is no indication if this box was
designed in accordance with any AASHTO Standard Highway Loading
2 Without adequate foundation information it is impossible to
determine the adequacy of the footing size
3 The inlet of the box particularly, and the outlet depending on the
existing ground line, should have wingwalls Wingwalls at the inlet
are necessary from a hydraulics consideration and also to prevent
erosion Wingwalls at the outlet may also be necessary to prevent
erosion
4 It does not appear prudent to attach a new concrete box onto the
short section of the existing box without knowledge of the construction
and condition of the existing box
5 The proposed handrail definitely does not comply with AASHTO
Specifications We would suggest that a more substantial rail
be used
In closing we would reco~mend that the box be designed by a competent Professional
Engineer for a Standard AASHTO Loading that is mutually acceptable to all parties
concerned
Very truly yours,
PC jc
ut-t::lrhmon+
E N HAASE
Chief ,En. gineelf/
\ 'Jc' /! L . '-1J.U,.j{."j
) ~ --,' l-.... \
By Paul Chuvarsky, P E
C~~&& n'A ~__ r__
CITY
Page 8 Minutes IO/20
JF 'VHEAT RiDGE .... IV-MOR.
JDUWi
To
Planning Department
From Forrest Smi th
Subject
Jacobson Subdivision
Date
October 20, 1975
Approved
Date
I have reviewed the drainage study for Applewood Knolls, 12th Filing
and found \-le need the follocving requirements
1 Development Agreement for curb, gutter and sidewalk
2 Certification that all d-cainage \-lil1 fo1lar'1 the natural
drainage flow
3 Information from the engineer concerning detention ponds
on Lots 1 - 5 They need to be reviewed by the Engineering
Department and the City Engineer
4
Show the cul-de-sac as two different tracts
so they can be vacated at the time the street
toward W 38th Avenue, if it comes into be~ng
Tracts A & B,
is extended
5 Show drainage easements across Lot 6 for the two drainage
pipes coming into the property and also a drainage easement
for the large drainage channel across Lot 6
6 It was brought to our attention the City of Lakewood is
proposing a 36" R C P pipe to be installed at the S/E
corner of the property This pipe is a drainage pipe
and we should have more information concerning the additional
runoff coming from this proposed pipe
~,~vu~/ ht'AJ/
For'rest E Smith .
FES/es
/""
;;2c
REVISED 10-!5-75
Page 9 Cr ~inutes
CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE - MUNICIPAL ElECTIO~
NOVEMBER 4, 1975
WARD I PRECINCT I
COUNTY PRECINCTS 301-309-411-417
301
JUDGES
DOROTHY JOHNSON Supply Jurlge
3001 CHASE STREET
DENVER, COlO 80214
233-1310
411
417 MAXINE PARKER
5665 W 27TH AVENUE
DENVER, COlO 80214
237-0908
309
\"ARD I
JUDITH COMPOSTO
5600 W 38TH AVENUE
DENVER, COlO 80212
423-1539
417
ALTERNATES
SAllY MC GlOTHlEN
2835 OTIS COURT
DENVER, COlO 80214
237-3057
Doris Thompson
2845 Fenton St.
Denver, Colorado 80214
2373409
PRECINCT II - COUNTY PRECINCTS 303-307-311-321
303 ELAINE BACA
7320 W 33RD AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COlO 80033
233-1596
303
321
BERYL FRAZIER Supply Judge
7425 W 34TH AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COlO 80033
237-2432
321
Gail Ca:c'8Y
3190 l:Jadswort-,
Denver, Colorado B0215
D7-0n9
HELEN PIXLEY
7111 W 29TH AVENUE
DENVER, COlO 80215
233-3785
311
REVA ENSOR
6001 W 32ND AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COlO 80033
233-1760
WARD II PRECINCT III - COUNTY PRECINCTS 218-238-302-318-323
323
218
218
M CAROLYN RI TZ Supply Judqe
5115 SWADLEY STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COlO 80033
422-4670
302
BARBARA DAUBENSPECK
8630 W. 46TH AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COlC 80033
421-7967
302
HELEN TEIlBORG
4576 ESTES STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COlO 80033
424-2745
318
-1-
ETHELYN CROHE
10351 H 44TH AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
424-0031
CLARA JEAN PACE
10855 W 47TH AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COlO 80033
424-7947
IRENE GIMENO
5075 GARRISON
WHEAT RIDGE, COlO 80033
424-6470
,-
"
/'
JUDGES
ALTERNATES
WARD II PRECINCT IV - COUNTY PRECINCTS 305-306-310
306 MARY DIMITROFF Supply JudD8
7465 W 48TH AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COLa 80033
424-9673
310
305
ANN BERTOLETTE
4475 HARLAN COURT
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
422-5704
306 Hazel McLain
4465 Teller St.
Wheat Ridge, Colo.B0033
424-2965
306 ANNA MAE PALMER
4670 WEBS fER STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
422-1967
KATHLEEN BOHER
4690 BALSAM STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
424-8747
WARD II PRECINCT V - COUNTY PRECINCTS. 304-312-324
324 VIRGINIA PROSE
4135 INGALLS STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
424-4788
312
312 Barbara Jubrias Supply Judge
4040 Lamar
Wheat Ridge, Colo. 80033
424-1750
304 Pearl Winblad
5B65 W. 38th Ave.
Den Lr, Colo. 80212
424-7549
CATHERINE MC DERMOTT
3925 MARSHALL STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
424-6891
304
NANCY E ROBERTS
3940 CHASE STREET
DENVER, COLO 80212
424-7293
WARD III PRECINCT VI - COUNTY PRECINCTS 313-315-317-322-325-326
325
325
313
Frances J. Austin
4210 Garland St.
Wheat Ridge, Colo. 80033
424-5953
325
BEVERLY HOWER
43 SKYLINE DRIVE
DENVER, COLO 80215
232-0366
FLO HI LMOT Supply Judge
25 PARAMOUNT PARKWAY
DENVER, COLa 80215
237-7308
326
FRANCES J AUSTIN
4210 GARLAND STREET
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
424-6963
ESTHER BURKHOLDER
9005 W 32ND AVENUE
WHEAT RIDGE, COLO 80033
237-6660
322 William Hamilton
3231 tJalsam
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
233-6853
-2-
Page 10 Minutes 10/20/75
AGENDA 'TEM- ,Ie /
-
;1'
OCT '0 'f91S
STUDY SESSION ITEM
,J.'
...
~
~t '1i.'
'fj
./1::
".~'
\<,
,/;.
-
:'^
~
t
.;
;':
r~~
<
M E M 0 RAN DUM
'\I!:t
.}'
~~;,
.~.
DATE
October 15, 1975
,f"
:~:
~~i
'~'
TO
John Jerman
--
f
~,
*
FROM
SUBJECT
Maurice Fox, City Attorney
JIM BRITTON PROPERTY
3630 Garland Street, Wheat Ridge
Please be advised that our office has conferred with
c
~f'
~
Mr Forrest Smith and Mr Jay Smith, both of the Public
:
~
Works Department for the City of Wheat Ridge and
Larry Thomas, former Chief Engineer of the City of Wheat
Ridge, now presently the Adams County Public Works Dept
regarding Mr Britton's property and his claims regarding
change of the street grades for the street abutting the
,.ji
~
f
,~
~
"
l$
';
".
;f.
~
rear of his property
I have reviewed the City's file re-
--
<Jr'
f
.~
:.;;..
1:
~
~,
~'
,'?'-
i"
i
,~
~
J
f;
'g
l'l
'J),
~
,;
~
garding this matter and have personally viewed the pro-
perty and photographs of the alleged damage
It is my
conclusion that, after talking to these individuals and
investigating this matter, that the City has incurred no
liability whatsoever to Mr Britton for the damage to his
property
The curb, gutter, and street grade on the west
side of the street upon which Mr Britton's property abutts
were built according to plan
Forrest Smith of the Public
Works Department of the City of Wheat Ridge recently sur-
--1
veyed the street grades and elevations adjacent to
Mr Britton's property
The finished curb, gutter, and
{..~
rr
"
i;'
r
.
i
~
-2-
street grades at Mr Britton's property are within
l/lOth of a foot from the elevations and grades delineated
in the plans
Based on Mr Smith's survey and state-
ments furnished to our office, it is my conclusion that
the City has incurred no liability whatsoever for the
problems encountered by Mr Britton
Any liability arlslng from the fact that the northeast
corner of Mr Britton's property is approximately two (2)
feet above street grade would attach to the contractors
involved in putting in the street, and not to the City
Based upon these facts, any recourse that Mr Britton
might have should be effected through the judicial system
and against the contractor
The City has suffered no liability in this matter, and
therefore need not compensate Mr Birtton for his loss