HomeMy WebLinkAbout02/23/1976
f'HI\IUTLS
February 23, 1975
The three hundredth and seventeenth regular meeting of the Wheat
Ridge City Council was called to order by Mayor Frank Stites
The film "Downtowns for People" was shown which demonstrated
proper planning for downtown areas
Councilmen present were Mary Jo Cavarra, Joseph Donaldson,
Robert Howard, Calvin Hulsey" Larry Merkl and Louise Turner.
Also present were City Administrator John Jerman, City Attorney
Maurice Fox, City T easurer James Malone, City Clerk Elise BF~gham
staff and the room filled to capacity with interested citizens.
City Treasurer James Malone gave the Budget and Appropriations
Report for the month of January 1975. He stated the revenue is
$38,500 ahead of last year and that 7.12% of the anticipated
revenue has been received and 5.51% of the anticipated expenditures
have been spent.
Mr. Malone also presented the Semi-Annual Police Pension Fund Report
and stated there was a fund balance of $322,837.71 He stated all
of the funds are invested except $1179.88 in a checking account.
He stated he had received the actuarial report on the fund and
that it would be available for perusal
There being no corrections or additions to the Minutes of 2/9/75,
the werE declared approved by the Mayor
Public Comment was made by
Donna Repond of 10900 West 41 Place who stated there was a soil
erosion problem in her yard which is caused by the Hildenbrand
duplex development which tore out an irrigation ditch in back of
her property causing the water to run down her back fence which
is eroding her fence and wil cause it to fall over. She stated
she did not feel she was responsible for the deterioriating situation
and that the City has done nothing to help her yet, and yet repair
bf an irrigation ditch 2 or 3 houses down from her. Councilman Cavarra
requested that this matter be researched by Mr. Jerman and be placed
on the 3/8/75 Agenda.
Jeanne Merkl,of 3891 Estes stated she had requested Coun il to hold
Public Hearings regarding the placement of curb and gutter and was
req~esting that Council do this again She stated she felt streets
people were especially interested in were W. 32 Avenue, W. 38 Avenue
and W. 44 Avenue. She stated she had received an Administrative
Bulletin and felt it was a good idea to pass it along to the neighbors.
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I
project be taken off the table."
Turner and passed 5-0
move that the West 32 Avenue pathway
Motion was seconded by Councilman
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I
immediately after Public Hearings
~otion was seconded by Councilman
move that this item be placed
(I.E Item 19 32 Avenue pathway) "
Turner and passed 5-0
Item 1. a request by Robert Murray for a remodeling permit at
Clancy's located at 10117 West 37 Place which has a Class G liquor
license was 6cheduled Mr Murray was present.
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I move thai approval bE giVEn for
remodeling ai Clancy's at 10117 West 37 Place." Motion was seconded
by Councilman Merkl and passed 5-0.
MINUTES - 2/23/76 - Continued
-2-
Item. 2 an application for a Public Hearing for a new Class D
retail package liquor license for Old Prospector's Ltd at 5012
Kipling St. was scheduled. Court Reporter Ruth Carsh was
present to take down the proceedings. The City'S invest.igation had
been distributed showing 62 in favor, 13 opposed and 25 no opinion
M. Dwiqht Griqqs of 5771 Wadsworth Bypass, attorney represented
the applicant and was one of the corporate officers. He presented petitions &
numbered Exhibits into the record, and called on the following
to testify Mr. A.J. Cain who was president and sole stock holder,
Mr. Buell Dunn who had applied for a Class D liquor license which
had been approved by the City of Wheat Ridge dba Bunny's Bottle
Liquor Store at 9900 West 48 Avenue. An agreement was presented
signed by Mr Dunn stating that he was formally withdrawing his
application for the liquor store which had never been in business
to date, Murphv Thomas of 5185 Simms Place who was a nearby resident
of the proposed store and spoke in favor Mr Griqgs requestee
that the neighborhood to be considered be extended North of 1-70
East of Tabor and South of 52 Avenue
Motion by Councilman Howard "I move that we strike 110 signatures
from the petitions presented due to the lack of correct addresses "
Motion was seconded by Councilman Merkl and TIED 3-3. Councilmen
Hulsey, Cavarra and Donaldson voted "nay." Mayor Stites voted "nay"
and the MOTION WAS DEFEATED 4-3.
No one appeared in opposition.
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I move that Council approve the new
Class D retail package liqJor license for Old Prospector's Ltd.
at 5012 Kipling Street, contingent upon withdrawal and surrender
to the City the liquor license approval for Bunny's Bottle Liquor
Store at 9900 West 48 Avenue." Motion was seconded by Councilman
Hulsey and passed 5-0.
Item 3 Case WZ-75-01 an application by Lutheran Medical Center
requesting approval of preliminary and final development plans and rezoning
for a Planned Commercial Development at Dudley and W 35 Avenue was
scheduled for Public Hearings. The Planning Department and Planning
Commission had recommended approval. Mr. Zwaqerman, Director of
Community Development stated he had in his possession a petition
opposing the development and various letters from persons withdrawing
their signatures on the petition. The plan is for 3 office buildings
for the medical profession.
The following people were present on behalf of the application
Karl Streufert of 8098 W. 38 Avenue, president of Lutheran Hospital
Center, Dr. Frank Traylor of 4045 Field Drive, Chief of Surgery,
Dr Vernon Ritzman of 14990 Foothill Road, Herman Feucht, Treasurer
of the hospital, Carlyle Guy, architect of the plan, and Phillip
Scott, Traffic Engineer Councilman Merkl mentioned at the
previous meeting he had requested that a better internal traffic
pattern be designed and alternate exit routes be looked into
Councilman Turner recommend a south exit only at West 35 Avenue
and Wadsworth which the hospital had rejected. Councilman Cavarra
asked to go on record if it was critical to the hospital to bring
in more doctors, which this complex would dq at this time. Mr.
Streufert stated it was not critical to the hospital but was critical
to the communuty Mr. Streufert stated in answer to another
question that there were no deFinite plans for the undeveloped land
of the hospital. Mr. GL testified the new line the sanitation
district was planning to inst8ll which would accomodate this
complex, would be put in regardless whether this project was built.
Persons appearing in favor of the rezoning were Millie Malcolm
of 3300 Moore Street, a member of the hospital ~uxillary staff,
Homer Roesener of 2955 Quay,concerned citizen, Patrick W. Carsen
of 3840 Nelson who spoke for the Wheat Ridge Lutheran Churcli Council
MINUTES - 2/23/75 - Continued
-3-
who had voted to wit~ldraw tieir name from the opposing petition
and that the church's stand is neutral on the issue.
Speaking in opposition were Ed Fogel of 3295 Dudley who stated
there is a requirement for hospitals to have a 5 year or 3 year plan
and gave alternate exit routes and presented slides of the property
in question, Mr. Lee Gerbig of 3375 Dudley who stated he spoke for
several and they were not necessarily opposed to the development
but had concerns with the traffic study and patterns devised,
Mr. Helmut Mueller, Rt. 5, Box 27, Lookout Mountain who is a
professional architect and planner who gave suggestions on the
traffic design and recommended depressed parking to shield the
cars from site and questioned why 35 Ave. should end at the parking lot;
Mr George Christensen who stated he lived across from the development
who si~d that the State ground law that must be complied with and
suggested building the buildings on the higher land and have the
parking lot on the lower land, reduce the number of units, develop
circular arterial onto 38th and clarify the ditch widening and
roadway and screen ~rking with shrubs etc., and Mr. George Jenson
Of 8180 West 39 Avenue who wanted to ask a question but was told
he could not.
In rebuttal, Mr. Levine representing Lutheran Hospital stated the
opposing petitions did not designate the property owner in the preamble
and desired the record to reflect the removal of the Wheat Ridge
Lutheran Church signature and that the nearest property owner was
200' away who had signed it.
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move for the approval of the preliminary
development plan for the Planned Commercial Development case WZ-75-01
of Lutheran Medical Center at the Northeast corner of the intersection
of Dudley and West 35 Avenue for the ITlilowing reasons
1. It complies to the Land Use Plan.
2. It is is compliance with the requirements of
Ordinance No. 98.
3. It was recommended by the Planning Department.
I further move that the development be completed within 10 years,
and that the development meet all requirements imposed by the
Community Development Department and that a traffic pattern
alternative be developed before the final plan is approved and that
the traffic plan be approved by the Community Development Department
and the other staff members of this city, and that the West 35
Avenue dedication be included in this plan." Motion was seconded
by Councilman Donaldson. City Attorney Fox ruled if the Motion
passed the zoning would be changed, but the concept of development
plan is not yet decided. Question was called on the Motion and
passed 5-1. Councilman Cavarra voted "nay."
It was agreed to extend the meeting past 11 00 p.m.
Item 4. Case MS-75-01 by Fred A. Reithmann requesting approval of
a minor subdivision at 3825/27 Sheridan Blvd. was scheduled for
Public Hearing. There are two existing residential homes on the
grounds and the purpose of the request is to allow sale of one
of them. The applicant was present
Andrew V Thomas of 10240 W Warreri Lrive, real estate agent spoke
in favor of the rezoning
No one appeared in opposition
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move for approval of the Preliminary
Plan for Minor Subdivision at 2B25-27 Sheridan Blvd, with an approximate
area of 15,744 sq f~ , Case MS-75-01, and that the park fee be waived."
Motion was seconded by Councilman Hulsev and passed 5-0
MINUTES - 2/23/75 - Continued
-4-
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move for approval and adoption
of the final minor subdivision plan for 3B25-27 Sheridan Blvd,
Case MS-75-01." Motion was seconded by Councilman Turner and
passed 5-0
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I move that Council approve the
renewal of the 3.2 package beer license for the Dillon Co. dba King
Soopers at 3400 Youngfield Street." Motion was seconded by Councilman
Turner and passed 5-0
Item 5 Case MS-73-13 application by Martha Moder for approval of
Moder Subdivision at 31 Ave and 32 Avenue and Reed Street was
scheduled for Public HearingOf Jhere is one existing single family
residence and access bymeansA2~' ditch easement is necessary for
the other lot The grade of "the bridge was questioned by several
Councilmen
Darrell Skelton, attorney at 4380 Harlan for the applicant was present
and stated he was under the impression everything was in order for action
by the Council tonight
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I move this hearing be continued until
the applicant can submit a design for the bridge or access to the
property and or Public Works Dept. has approved this plan." Motion
was seconded by Councilman Donaldson and passed 4-2. Councilmen
Howard and Turner voted "nay."
Item 7 Application for a Community Development Block Grant
for various city improvements as designed by the Department of
Community Development was scheduled. A slide presentation was
given on the concept of the grant The proposed application is attached to the
Minutes.
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I move we authorize the City Administrator
to coordinate the pre-application for the community development block
grant." Motion was seconded by Councilman Hulsey
Motion by Councilman Howard "I move we delete Item 3 B." Motion
was seconded by Councilman Cavarra and was DEFEATED 4-2. Councilmen
Donaldson, Hulsey, Merkl and Turner voted 'Inay "
Motion by Councilman Turner "I move in Item 3 B. the wording
'cabin in Johnson Park or other' be deleted, to read 'Restoration
of historic places within the City, and construction IT historical
monuments or plaques '" Motion was seconded by Councilman Cavarra
and TIED 3-3. Councilmen Howard, Merkl and Donaldson voted "nay.'1
Mayor Stites voted 'Iaye" and the MOTION PASSED 4-3
Motion by Councilman Cavarra "I move that Item 5.C be deleted."
Motion was seconded by Councilman Turner and TIED 3-3. Councilmen
Hulsey, Merkl and Donaldson voted "nay." Mayor Stites voted "aye'
and Motion PASSED 4-3
Question was called on Amended Motion and passed 5-0.
Item 19. the pathway of W. 32 Avenue discussion was taken up next.
Motion by Councilman Turner "I move we allow dscussion from the floor."
Motion was seconded by Councilman Cavarra and passed 5-0
Citizen comment was made bV
Mary Jane Weber of 12025 W. 32 Avenue recommended incorporating existing
sidewalk into the proposed one and that the proposed walkway would
go through her yard and other people's yards, Dougal Graham of 3330
Chase who was interested in bikeways, Mr Thomas 51aterlee of 6859
W. 32 Avenue who was concerned about the width of the pavement along
W. 32 Avenue especially in his neighborhood where many large trees were,
Ben Chastain of 3f50 Marshall who stated his area meeting agreed
on 44' flow lineoasphalt, and 5" verticle curb, Donald Lancaster of
4076 Everett who spoke in favor of having the walkway, Jerry Fountain
of 3230 Flower who recommended that the engineer be allowed to determine
the specifics on the bikeway. Councilman Turner did speak in favor
of an asphalt bikeway
MINUTES - 2/23/75 - Continued
-5-
f'!loLiorl LJy Councilman Merkl "I move that a concrete bikeway/walkway
be in5talled along W. 32 Avenue at the oU~er limits of the 60' ROW
at an elevation equal ro the crown of the roadway or an elevation
determined by our engineering department. I further move that
no curb or gutter be insta~led and that all grading and landscaping
be completed. I further move that each item in the letters from
the State Department of Highways dated 2/23/75 and 2/9/75 be explored
by our staff" Motion was seconded by Councilman Donaldson.
Motion to Amend by Councilman Turner "I move rhere be engineerir!g
authorized to make recommendations allowing fleXibility regarding
elevations and materials to be used." Motion was seconded by
Councilman Cavarra and was DEFEATED 4-2 Councilmen Merkl, Donaldson,
Howard and Hulsey voted "nay "
Question was called on Lhe Mot.ion and passed 5-0
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move the City designate Mr Jerman
as the representative to deal with the State Highway Department and
that he be the only representative on behalf of the cil;y to deal with
this agency." Motion was seconded by Councilman Donaldson and
passed 5-1. Councilman Turner vof;ed "nay."
A Motion to adjourn was defeated
Motion by Councilman Cavarra. "I move that Items 13, 15, 17, 18 be placed
on the consent agenda and that we consider Mr. Fox's ordinance ~egarding
Valley Water District) and then adjourn." Motion was seconded by
Councilman Merkl and passed 5-0.
Item 8. Consent Resolution No. 435 was introduced by Councilman Merkl
and was read. Said Resolution authorized the following actions
9. Resolution opposing House Bill 54 regarding RTD as per
Study Session. Consent Action Approve Resolution and direct
City Clerk to send to City's legislative representatives, RTD and CML.
10. Resolution urging reapportioning of the Highway Users
Tax as per study session Consent Action Approve Resolution and
direct City Clerk to send to City's legislative representatives,
legislative Transportation Committee and CML.
13. Authorize purchase of 2 trucks for Public Works Dept and
related equipment. Consent Action Receive report, authorize purchase
through State Bid to be charged to Account 520.20 (in the amount of
$28,157 40)
15 Increase in Denver Water Rates and Special Improvement Fee
for P~spect Park Consent Action Receive report and authorize
payment of fee in the amount of $5,900 for Prospect Park Water connection,
charge to Ca~tal Improvement Fund, Account 548.
17. Request for payment of psychological examinations and reports
on 20 police officer I candidates required by Civil Service Commission
in examination process. Consent Action Aut.horize payment of $1,000
to Reid, Merrill, Brunson & Assoc., and charge to Account 417.32.
18 Award bid for Public Officials Liability Insurance for
policy period 3/1/75 to 3/1/77 face value $1,000,000. Consent Action
Receive report and recommendation of Galbraith & Green, Inc., City's
insurance representatives and award bid as follows Account 410.36-$100,
Account 415.35 - $200, 412.35 - $154, 418.35 - $300, 421.35 - $400,
422.35 - $500, 440 35 - $1400 452.35 - $500 for a total amount
of $3554.
Motion by Councilman Merkl "I move for the adoption of Resolution
No. 435." Motion was seconded by Councilman Howard and passed 5-0.
Ordinance No. 205 granting ROW to the Valley Water District was introduced
by Councilman Donaldson and the title was read.
Motion by Councilman Donaldson "I move for the adoption of Ordinance
No 205 on first. reading and order it published" Motion was seconded
by Councilman Howard and passed 5-0.
Motion by Councilman Merkl
"I move the lowest and best bid be awarded
MINUTES - 2/23/76 - Continued
-5-
to Booth - Rouse Equipment Co at 5700 Eudora 5treet, Commerce Lity
Co for one snow plow with under trUck hitch installed and 1 (additional)
under truck hitch installed at; a cost not to exceed $4,459 00
for a total of $4,459.00 to be charged to Account. 520.20."
Motion was seconed by Councilman Hulsey and passed 4-2. Councilman
Turner and Howard "nay" It was noted by Mr. Jerman that monies
for this purchase will have to be transferred at a later time
Meeting was adjourned at 2 10 a.m
(
I j
l" .
t.lise Brougham,
{ '1/
Ci ty Clerk {
,
-I
,-.
APPROVED
;/ I
7T.~ I
, \:_-17- ..
I
,
STATE DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
HHS 0006(6)
32nd Avenue
Ped. Bicycle Path
JACK KINSTLINGER
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
E. N. HAASE
CHIEF ENGINEER
STATE OF COLORADO
ff2-~..~~.'" -~
.."....'C'......,"'.=:;,.'..'t"',. 1
.' .. .. '........._J
t'
F~\. ~,=,;
~lt~~i:%~_~
DISTRICT 6
R. J BRASHER
DISTRICT ENGINEER
2000 SOUTH HOLLY
DENVER COLORADO 80222
(303) 7579252
February 23, 1976
DOH Ref. 06-00
Mr. John A. Jerman
City Administrator
City of ~~eat Ridge
POBox 610
Wheat Ridge, Colorado 80033
Attn
Clyde Hobbs
Gentlemen
It has been brought to our attention through numerous conversations with the
Federal Highway Administration, and by the various articles in the local newspapers
during the past week, that there seems to be some questions that were not answered
or not answered clearly enough in our letter of February 9, 1976.
I will therefore attempt to clarify our position and your responsibilities
in qualifying for Federal-Aid funding, in this letter.
I will further explain the requirements outlined in the first letter with
the same numbered paragraphs.
1. The city wide pedestrian-bike plan is required so that this proposed
segment is assured of being a link to an over-all plan rather than a
segmented path without any future connection to other cities bike plans
or even the City of Wheat Ridge's future bike trails
2. A future plan for the alignment and development of 32nd Avenue is all
that is required, at this time. We do not require construction of this
plan immediately. The intent of this requirement is to insure the
Colorado Department of Highways and the FHWA that the thousands of
dollars of Federal-Aid spent now are not declared unusable and tern out
in a few years, because the City was not planning ahead We are not
recommending it be planned or built to 4 lanes. This would be a City
determination based on traffic usage. We do note that it is classified
as a collector under the Joint Regional planning Program and a 44'
roadway section based on your City's standards would be minimum.
~. ~ 3. In order to determine a future plan for reconstruction of 32nd Avenue
(if desired), or a pedestrian-bike path now, it must be determined what
the right-of-way limits are in which improvements can be made or how
much additional right-of-way is required to accomplish the proposed work
Mr. John A. JerllU.
February 23, 1976
HHS 0006(6)
Page 2
4. During the field inspection, it was obvious that many power poles
must be relocated in order to build the bike path. Who is respon-
sible for the relocation expense could be important to the project.
5. As you know, this is a High Hazard Safety Project and the intent of the
project is to protect the pedestrian and bikes from automobile traffic.
The only way to do this when the path is. adjacent to the roadway is
with a physical barrier. There are, of course, a few places where this
would be impractical or impossible and therefore would not be required.
We do not want to further encourage pedestrian and bike traffic to
use the path and not be able to offer a safer, protected facility.
6. A 5' sidewalk is fine for pedestrian traffic, but where bike traffic is
encouraged to use the same facility, they are not compatible in less
than an 8' width This project was submitted and approved as a pedestrian-
bike path project.
7 Again there can be minor exceptions to the full 8' pathway requirement.
We are somewhat flexible in problem areas and feel a reasonable solution
may be worked out when a proposed plan is presented In order to meet
our program schedule, we suggest a draft proposed plan for the pedes-
trian-bike path be presented to our personnel on March 1, 1976. I
8. It is our impression that where existing right-of-way is to be used or
additional right-of-way is required, landscaping, including large trees,
bushes, and shrubs would have to be removed to make the accommodation.
Also, some concrete walls, fencing and irrigation ditches will have to
be replaced or adjusted We are almost sure that impacts from this sort
of involvement will require a look at other alternatives and possibly a
full Environmental Impact Statement With this program, it is not the
intent, nor do we have the time or funds to pursue such a course.
We understand from an unconfirmed source that Lena Gulch is being studied
and an expansion of the entire system is proposed. If this is the case, we would
not be able to participate in the lengthening of the box at 32nd Avenue until a
construction time schedule and the proposed replacement box size is determined.
We would like to express to the City of Wheat Ridge officials, personnel
and interested parties that in the future all inquiries concerning this project
be directed to the Colorado Department of Highways District VI office. Although
there are 'Federal funds involved;it is the CooH's responsibility to administer
this money and the resultant projects in the best interests of all concerned. In
order to do this efficiently, we must have the full cooperation of those involved.
We therefore, request that the City delegate those persons responsible to this
project so that we may better coordinate the work required into one concentrated
effort and proceed ,4ith construction of this project.
,. ~ If you have any questions, comments or if we can be of service in any way,
please contact Harry Sabin at 757-9210.
Mr. John A. Jerman
February 23, 1976
HHS 0006(6)
Page 3
Very truly yours,
RI CHARD J BRASHER
District Engineer
\\. ~~
BY~~
Harry Sabin
Urban Systems Engineer
cc Vernon-Kasenga
B Tucker
~ Brasher-Clevenger
File: Sabin
H I G H V._
32:ld
V SPed.
, .
~-i.'Vel' t~
STA
DEPARTMENT
OF
S~r.i<:l:: ? tL
JACK KINSTLlNGER
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWA (5
E. N. HAASE
CHIEF ENGINEER
...
\ \
~ "
i . f..j
1
DISTRICT 6
R. J BRASHER
DISTRICT CJGI JEER
aTA,TIt 01" COL:::I'l"OO
2000 SOUTH HOLLY
OENVER: COLORADO 50222
i.~O:rJ 7~7 92~2
FebruarJ 9, 1976
DOH Ref. 06-00
Hr. John A .Tct""'.ililI!
City AdDinistrator
City of t{n2o.t Kid}::
POBox 610
\{heat Ridge, Color~do &~033
Attn
Llycle Hobbs
Gentlemen
Your request for :u:1di~!~ assistance on a pedestrian-bike path'..IilY proposed for
West 32nd Av~r'.Ue ( oll"nd Stcest to Youngrield), has been C!n?roved for Fetlc!:J.i.-Aid
under Sc:::ti.::ll1 :::J'l of the ir.h~.;::y Safe:::' Act of 1973, the hi.gh hazard loca::.icn
cateror] $lSJ,OJJ h::s been allotted to this project It is baoed on a 90%
Federal, 1~70 City split
A field inspecti::m 'Yns held to review the project possibilities The Color3.co
DepartI:lent of HighwdYS, City of Hhcdt RidGe and Fed"ral Hit,h..;:lYs A[..r;llnistration
were represented.
Sa~e of the require~ents for this type project were discussed and are listed
be 1 0"";.
1. A Citywide co~cehensive pedestrian - bike plq, has to be established.
This plan oust be developed in cooperation with the surroundi~3 Cities.
2. A plan for future alignment and develo?~ent of 32r.d Avenue has to be
pre::ented by the C...ty This sho'_lld conform to the JRFP pl:m A 52'
roadway F L to F L would be reco~~ended by the CDH, but 44' would
probably be accept"blc, if this is the City's current standard.
3. An accurate location and description of existing right of way along
32nd Avenue BUst U~ presented
4. It must be detemined who is responsible for relocating power poles and
lines (if required).
5. A physical barrier oust be constructed between the automobile travel w~y
and the pedest.::ian-bike path"av 'fills coul.d be curb, guardrail, etc.
6. Installation of <i. curb, gutter and 5' sidewalk is not acceptable.
,r
'x Je)hn A Jen,l"
JJ P,S 0006(6)
Febru~ry 9, 1976
Page 2
7. A full 8' of ped~strian-bike pathway is required
7' in proolem areas m3y be acceptable.
Short stretches of
8 It must be determined that acquiring additional right of "hly or even
using e""isti~g R (I .] would not create iul?2.CtS that "light cause re-
classification of this project and require an enviroITQenta1 ~~act
statement.
Unless all of the above requireI:1Cnts can be met in short order and providing
othcr cc~~lications do not arise, I feel th2 project ~3y be in jeopardy. With
"11v $150,000 2-''3i1001e, it ;11so seems l:nlikely U1at t'1C total project coulet be
com?l~tcd,especially with the box extension required at Lena Gulch.
If this is the cas<~, it would be my reco=endation to concentrate on the
b0': <::t Leona Gulch This is. itself is a hazard to pedestrian-bi.ke and autom.)bi1e
traffic, as YOU "'211 kno.... Lccc,bening the box at both ends "~'ould eliminate a
hign i ::.z.a::d fa:: t,l," tr;1"vclinf public and .,'ould also be a start in the right
dir,?ction for the proposed pedestrian-bike pathway.
>7c ,,'ocrld 2.??r2ciate ans..;ers and COr,L""ents to the above re"uir('~pnts a~ soon
, p^>ssit' e If YOU hav" any q:Jcstions or cor;Gents concerning this mtter,
1)~C~G cn-~tact thi3 office.
Very truly yours,
RICFAnJ) J BRI.Sm:R
District EnJineer
BY-\-' \-- --~ ~I -~~n'\.:;._>-- ..... \
I
f{~irry S3~i.n \
UrD~n ~ s~em$ Sngineer
cc Vernon-Kasenga
B Tucker
Brasher-Clevenger
File Sabin
CITY '"OF WHEAT RIDGE - MEMORANDUM
To
JOHN JEPMAN, CIn ADmNISTRATOR
From
DENN IS 1\' ;::WAGERH\:-I
DIRECTOR Of CO~~l1Jr.ITY DEVE[lP~\DT
Subject CO~lt-IUNIn DEVELOr~lENT BLOCK GRANTDate
FEBRUARY 19, 1976
7
Appro"ved Date
APPROVED 2/23/76 as amended by City Council
Attached is the staff review and proposal relative to the discretiona~y,
funds of the Communi tv Development Block Grant rhis packet should be
distributed to the City Council relative to the public hearing to be held
on February 23, 1976
I have briefly attempted to explain what the program is and how it works
in the attachment In addition, the department has made suggestions as
to what eligible projects the city should apply for These are preliminary
in nature and are dependent upon Planning Commission and City Council re-
view as well as comments made by the general public at the public hearings
If you have anv questions, please feel free to contact me at any time
DWZ/cg
NOTE
The general concepts of this Grant proposal were discussed by
the City Council Community Development Committee on Friday,
February 13, 1976
.
"k""_Olb<"'-;..."~
. -~.
5 Removal of barriers to elderly and/or handicapped to include
A Better access
B Ramped curb cuts and building entrances
~. RedesigR Gf publie 8HilJings (st3ir., rp~rrooms, ete j
O~Le+-e!J
6 Relocation costs (rent loss etc ) for those structures removed from
flood plain per item 4
7 Matching monies to obtain other funds to include
A Flood improvement of Lena Gulch or other drainage areas
B Other capital improvements (walkways, etc )
The pre-application if approved by the Planning Commission and the Cit, Council
will describe briefly what the city proposed to do aad the approximate cost thereof
It will include all proiectc approved by the Council with approximate cost figures
to be dctermined bv city staff members In addition, the application will ac-
knowledge public comments and desires as noted during the public hearings If
the pre-application is approved by HUD, the Department of Community Development
will complete a full application to completelY document any and all approved pro-
jects as required bv fILm This final document will come back to the Planning
Commission :ll1d Ciry Council for prior approval and signatures before sending to
the federal offices
.
CITY -iF WHEAT RIDGE - MEMORAr-<rDUM
To
John Jerman, City Administrator
From
George Rhodes, Purchasing Agent
February 20, 1976 ~
.
Subject
Insurance Proposal
Date
Approved
Date
Contacts were made with Gallaher Insurance Company, Trust-Hall and Galbraith &
Green s~nce, our present Public Offioia1 Liability Insurance Policy was can-
celed
Galbraith & Green was the only company to submit proposals on a new Public
Official Liability Policy They were able to obtain proposals from two firms
interested in this type of insurance
The proposals and costs of each policy are attached Galbraith and Green
recommends the policy be written with Midland Insuarnce Company
Annual Premi um
Option
$3,554
9,694
(Three year annual installments)
(Three year prepaid premium)
I recommend the premium be paid on a yearly basis and charged to the following
departmental insurance accounts
410 36 100
415 36 200 /<!'
412 36 154
418 36 300 .~
421 36 400
422 36 500 )-
'I
440 36 1400 l v I
462 36 500
Total
3554
cc Richard Andrews, Director or Administrative Services
'---
To
John Jer~an, City Administrator
From
,C;eorge. Rhodes,-Purchasing Agent ..
< cFeb"ory ':', ~:;6 ~
\ b \..
,.
Subject
SEE BEWW
Date
Approved
Date
~;~
.-'
SUBJECT
. .-r
STATE BID ON HODEL 1800 INTERNATIONAL 'fRUCK - PRICE Q.iloTi;' >- UNDER TllIL
GATE SPREADER - HUNCIE HOT SHIFT PTO AND ACCESSORIES
A review of the State Bid was made with Nr John Moore, Fleet Executive of International
Truck, concerning our need for tt.;o (2) trucks .>lith sanding equipment installed
Budgeted for this equipment is $34,000 which would include the two trucks and two sanders
installed
The following equipment will be furnished and installed on the trucks with pric2s taken
from the open end bid for the State of Colorado I will also .list items that are
standard equipment that will be furnished and installed in order that you may review
the manner in which the trucks will be equipped
IiGENDA
ITEM...__.L3
$8480
-
27,500 GV1V Truck ,,-i th 84" cab to axle
Wheel base 151 inches
Front axle capac2ty Y,JOO 1bs ~RC
Springs 9,000 front-24,OJO rear M2C
Brakes H D 19) sq inches front-441 sq inches rear
Reinforced fra~e-fu1l depth frame throughout
Engine 446 C I D
Tires & Wheels - lu hole budd disc wnee1s in lieu of cast
Transmission MT 650 ~utomatic
Spare Tire 1000 x 20 12 ply
Five M & Stires
Tinted Windshield
so gallon right side step tank with Ln tau~ pump
Engine hour ;;,cter
80 amp alternator
Power steering
Five cubic yard bed with SLX yard end
16" x 6" ..-est coast rear view I<!irror, both sides
Dual windshield wipers wi th :.;in6.sh~f91.j washer
Dual sun visors
H D fresh air heater ith dual defrosters
Corner clearance lights on cab
Class "AU type I turn signals with I C C hazard switch, double face front,
combination turn stop and tail lights rear, in steel housing welded into
the rear cor~ers of dump bed
Rear mild flaps compatible with dual wheels
Permanent ?-nti-freeze protection to minus 30 degrees
Sea t bel ts
Cigarette lighter
Warning bell on rear hub
Lighting system on truck and dump LOX to conform wi th Colorado Highlvay Department:.
regula tions
00
FEB 23 1976
~ ,
[II
.200.00
250 00
2828 70
175 00
200 00
20 00
246 00
45 on
115 00
299 50
2157 OC
~
Color - School Bus Yellow
Total net cost of truck and body including all above required equipment
Each 15,016 20
15,016 20
30,032 40
Less Tra.de In l,875 00
Total 28,157 40
The fo11c,ving iteJr.s [vere priced thru International Trucks and Booth-Rouse Equipment
Company that worles in conjunction with Internat.iona1 on snow removal equipment
2 each - Burch "Burco" Hydraulic Tailgate Spreader with feed roll Nadel UG67H,
with hydraulic spreader motor for feed roll, cab controlled manual flow control
valve, oil tank, hose & fittings
Each 1,150 00
Including installation
2,300 00
2 each - Muncie Hot Shift PTO and Transmission mounted hydraulics - including hydraulic
valve section for lifting and angling plow, raising dump bed and operating sander
Each -
1,471 00
2,942 00
Total package including installation of all equipment on trucks
2 each - Model 1800 International Trucks - 15,016 20 ea
2 each - Hydraulic Taj 19ate Spreader 1,150 00 ea
2 each - Muncie Hot Shift PTO including
Hydraulics 1,471 00 ea
30,032 40
2,300 00
2,942 00
35,274 40
(1,875 00)
33,399 40
Less Trade In - 1970 Model 1600 International Truck
This is within our budgeted funds of $34,000 for this equipment
Prices were obtained as per your request on a snow plow and accessories We believe
one snow plow to be sufficient for the new trucks Hor-lever, we believe the other new
truck should have a hitch installed in order that the plow could be used on either truck
available at the time
Total cost for this equipment would be as follows
1 - Burch Snmv Plow, Model PRF-10-2 Power Reverse Moldboard, with under truck hitch,
hydraulic controls and snow plow lights
1 - Burch Snow Plow - including all above attachments and
instal1a tion
3,669 00
1 - Under truck hitch for other truck for use with above snow plow
Price including installation 800 00
4,469 00
LJ
~ :J :0: ~
0 0 ....., <:) t'l
,.,. l\J
O:l ,.,. 8
tJ' ,.,. Q ...
Q 0 0 ~
to ::s ~
C'l en ., '. :>:l
::r )( ~'. =<:
Il> () LQ ~
.., C1l ::r
"l (1) ,.,. '-1 ~
Q Q, Q
Q. :::> e 0
:;.:
~ to ~ ..
0 ~ '-' C1l
l\J <: ~
~ O:l Q, ,.,.
0 , ::r
0 '-' ll> .,
0 \.ri ,.,. (1)
c: 'I tl fl
::s r;, M- 0
,.,. "" :J ::r '"
Q <: '"
C1l '"
"' {])
., S' :J
, Q..
\.ri r; ~ ,.,.
l\J 0 (1) -
Q '-' l, i'5
0 ,.,.
l\J ., ~ 't
<::> Q;
Q.. ::s ''l
0 Q, fl
b ::::-
O:l '"
Q (1) tn
l\J CIl {])
,-, ,.,.
'" 0
. to .."
:: ....
Cl, ,.,.
::r
f{ {])
,.,.
~ III "
" 0
.., ~ '-1
..,
Q, :J
m ,.,.
Q, en
.,
~ ,.,. ,.,. :J
<: '"
0 0 ,.,.
.., .....
Il> '-1 Q
:J ::s
,.,. '-1 '"
,.,. "' :J '-'
0 .., n-
,.,. :J (i) ~
Il> '" .,
N ,.,. :J c
..... pj fl
0 0 ct. >;-
.... :J ..... tn
'" 0
'-' :J --
\lJ III
>-3 '-. [Jl
>;
c - 't
-
~ fl III en
'" >;- ., .,
O:l '1 <:
" tn
'-' en ,.,.
u, ,.,. III
'I I~ ,.,.
.., en
""
Q r to
::> ......
~ Q..
"-
III
::! en
\;:: LQ
c
.....
:g
Il>
Q,
III
III tn
,.,.
en
ll> ><
I "0
8 '-'
III
.....
CIl ... :::>
,.,.
III en
,.,. Q,
...
:J
'<. OJ
f!)
8
..
- --~.,.-........._,.
?"-' '-1 r; to
) "0 ::! Cl '-1
~ g; ,.,. ~ ':::J
f1) '1l
., ~ (fl
to :J
., III <: c:
..... ,.,. '" :.>;:
~~ ..... i!=
0 ....
:J ;lJ
~g III '"
'-'
~~ ::,;
III
<: .,
~a. <:
(1)
~ tn
,.,.
fl\ .f!)
. .,
r;
Q
~
III
.::'
'C
't '-1 l\J
~ (1) :::>
,., ,.,. >-3
f!) .,
~ tn ., c
n- :J r)
~ III III >;-
n- n- tn
{]) .....
:; Q
to :J
..... CJ
Cl, N
III
CIl
-
,
I
.. ~
1
-.
.
I
I
a
-'< a
tl
::J "0 a
~ '" a
.., co
..,
I-< ..c: rtl
Qj tl .u
"0 .u t1
~ ..... t:::
:3 :::: .....
..
~ ,
-
..... ..c:
~ tl
.u
'" .....
I :x:: a
a a
.., -'<
~ I l' c;
Q:; ::J "0 '0
0 "" I-< Qj '0
....,c.. N .., ,
0.. .., "">
.., I-< rtl
S QJ '" .u
0 '" "0 tr.
t::: ~ ~. t:::
tJ) ::; .....
:J1 '"
t::: '"
OJ a
0. a
E: co
0 IS
'-'
. "0
.u l1!
t::: I-<
'" 0
E: .u ..,
c... CJ 8
..... (J
::l I-<
tJ..w ,
~tI) ::>-
>. .u
0:, CJ '".l .....
~ U) '< '-'
" 0
:<; >. 0 '0 Qj
;:;;, :<: :0:: ::l l
I kl I-<
V,) <;; ~ Qj
Cl..
l::l :.~: .w a ~
..... 0 0 '-' I
(' " 8 I
'" '-'l"-i '"
~
''"i
:l:
III
!i)
::J
I.,
~
"0 ~
III
<:! ~
!i) .... iii
<1l 0
"8 u
I, '11
::J
0. ~
Qj '11
.Q
.u
t:::
Qj
E:
0. :J1
..... t:::
::J <1l
tJ. ~ i
Qj
0
.., '-'
<1l
~ .u
~ t::: a
Qj '0 a
Qj E: (:J
I-< 0. .., <!\
..... .., '0
~ ::l 'il ..,.
0 tJ. .u
t:; kl tr. ..,.
fIl t:; "'"
QJ .....
<1l L)
I-< ::J ..c:
.u 0 tl
:<< Q:; .u
QJ I ..... ~
..c: ::::
CJ .u 0
..c: 0 -'<
.u 0 tl .....
q " '11
.u I-< ~
l1! E-< 0
..c: ~
.u I-<
Qj '11
"0 '0
t::: .t::: t::: ....
Qj rj.lJ ;:;;, .a
~ ...
I
C ~
U ..,
Qj 'lJ
I-< I.,
Qj "3 ....
~ :l: ~
III
II! III '0
.., ..,
.Q rC:l '"
'tl 'lJ a
.., co
'N ..... ::
'tl '" 0
~ '0
<1l ... f"J
!i) I-<
'" Qj 0
I-< CQ ....,
'" 0
'lJ '-' a
U) t:; '"
~(l rtl ,
t::: ::;, a
::J ... .w '"
4-, !i) " .,.,
fIl QJ '-'
.., -'< 3:
OJ v oS Qj
t:; ::J t) a
0 I-< I-< a
..... .u Cl Qj
.u ~ <!\
..... ~ ..c: Ie .u
"0 Qj ... 0 ..,. s::
'C t:; '-' ::s
<tl .u ..,. 0
Qj "3 , "'" u
4-; ..c: ..c: .u U
..... .u ... CJ "l:
Qj 0
III I-<
~ .u .u
~ ~ V,)
<:> 'lJ 'lJ
~ <1l III III
.... I-< Qj bI
i3j 0 tl ....
'1J '1l
~ ::l l< . 'U
kl kl III
<: s:: a 0 t:
<: 0 .u
8 ..... a .Q
.u ...... .u
kl Q '" 0 0
R: "'" t:; u
.
.
u
::l ...,
I; ..., ~ Cl
'" Cl
" li]
-i 8C\v '"
S! t::: ..... C\ 'l-
~ Q,..... ..... t::: C\
:J 'C :J ..... ,
<: .u :J 'U .u '"
......... ... t:::
I ..... V 'C :J
-<:: t::: :>, 0 .-
" V) ..... :::: =<:
.
-i li]
"l ... Cl
'0 QJ t::: Cl
;.,'C 0
'U ..... Cl
'< (!) C\ .u Cl
" '"' t::: 'U '"
::l Q,..... ..... ,
~V)'C ..... '"
::> :J 'U
QJ..., .u
I .u V li]
ill t::: t:::
,,'='..... .....
:>, 1
t::: ~
'U
1? c
8 "
.
.u ~
t:::
Ql ~
S
Cl.
.....
:J
0- j'
t<l
:... Ql 'U t .
~ li] ...
~ :J 0
:... 0 'g~
~ Cl;
:::> ~ I t<l ~
V) C': -<::
.lJ Cl
~ ~ 0 Cl
..... 81 0 ~ ~
C< 0:::
I
tll \..
t:::
..... \
'tl
:J
...,
tl
t:::
..... <4J
2 III
.u
... 1Il
0.. 0
.... tl
.... ~
.....
-<:: ~
li] li]~
.... tlltJ
0 i:;"..,
-<:: ..........
.u:J
QJ ~'U
..... :J...
tl C'C
E S::o-.
:J -<::
t::: :::., tll
I:: 1::...,
Q rJ ..........
~ ~ 'tlf'J
.u :J
8 .....~
<1J vI::
-<:: C:"..-.j
.... .u .....'\:l
I:: I :J
'0 (!) U;;...,
t::: EO; ...v
'U c.. QJC:
..... '0.....
:J 20
li] 0-
... t<l ...c-.
QJ Q,Q,
'C QJ li]
'U li] .u
Ql :J (!)"-< ...
... Q .u.....
Q, Cl; ~.t::: 0
li] I ~1I1 2'''''1
-<::
QJ .... ......... ..... f'J
.... Q ..... Q .J .u
'13 Q f'J.c: c: 0
C\ l'Q .... :J .jJ
QJ Q
..., ........ '" III
..... <lJ v
'U '. '\:It::: 1:J I<
.... 0 c: ::! c: ~
.jJ :J E '1l
...
QJ 'tl I I
'C QJ
t::: 'tl "''''
:J I<
~ '1l I<
~ ~
.... III
l!l \0
QJ .Q ...,
-<:: '"
.... 'tl c,
Cl;)
... ''"i ,.
Q tll ll:l Q .
t::: .u '\:l
QJ ..... f'J
li] .u tr) ...
f'J c: Q) Q
li :J q .....
0 'tl Q
.... E U Cl
t:: '"
c..'C '1l
c: :::., c::
Q) '1l .jJ .u '"
.c: tr) ..... ll)
.... li] QJ U
v ~
'\:l ..... .c3 QJ
c: ..... v c::
CJ :J .... Cl
~ 'U <:l CJ
... -<:: e '" .jJ
Q '\:l .u e 'l- t::
v :>, 0 '" :J
Q) -<:: .jJ '-' 0
... '1l lJ', !J
""1 -<:: I.>
~ ..., .jJ .u '"
'U QJ
QJ QJ 0
...
::. .u .jJ
=-= ~ V) 'tl
0 'tl
~ '1l llJ 0
..... C\
... Ql I.<
~ Q !J ".:
'0 X -<::
=-= :J <lJ
~ k1 t.l
~ t: 0 Ql
0 C:> oIJ ,J::)
~ 'Pi Cl
.u '" .u 0
:2 l.() C> .jJ
Q; t::
rff"