The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution-2001-0013 ~/ ~6 0(j RiCEP I LiN NO. , , , ! " ,', , 4 '~(_i 1.\l){)i.........tf:~.;:;II':j::j'.1 Pl-;:: \)01.-- '(,1f-, L.!HL, f:';~ '\J",.l.~i\j jitli ,,~-Fr hi. \,\ II' 1>1 .l.! I H J ,. I ill;"',II. ".',. I !" 1" r . ",..'1 ",. f, 1...1 iLUhHVU CITY OF WHEAT RIDGE, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO 13-2001 Series of 2001 TITLE A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE URBAN RENEWAL PLAN WHEREAS, in 1981, the City Council approved an urban renewal plan, known as the Wheat Ridge Town Center Project Urban Renewal Plan (hereafter Urban 1,1 Renewal Plan), which has been modified from time to time, for the elimination of \ /\[/ blight and redevelopment of certain portions of the City, and WHEREAS, such Urban Renewal Plan inc1uded the area depicted on the map designated as Exhibit 1 hereto, and WHEREAS, a portion of the redevelopment area covered by the Urban Renewal Plan (hereafter referred to as the Northern PortIOn) has not been developed or redeveloped since its inc\usion in the redevelopment area in 1981, and WHEREAS, although the Urban Renewal Plan proVided for the utilization of property tax incremental revenue sources within the redevelopment area, no such revenues have been realized from the Northern Portion since 1981, and WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority has recommended to City Council that the Urban Renewal Plan be modified to exc1ude the nonproductive Northern Portion of the redevelopment area, and WHEREAS, the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority has adopted Resolution No 01, Series of 2000, with such recommendation, and WHEREAS, because of such nonproductivity of the Northern Portion with relationship to property tax incremental revenues, the City Council concurs with the Wheat Ridge Urban Renewal Authority that it is in the best interests of the community to modify the Urban Renewal Plan by deleting the Northern Portion from the redevelopment area within the Plan, and WHEREAS, compliance with the Urban Renewal Law of Colorado (~3l-25-lOl et seq C R.S ) has been effected in the following respects, including but not lImited to City Council's resolution that this proposed modification is substantiaL referral of the modification to the City Planning Commission and its written recommendation that the modification IS in conformity with the City's Comprehensive Plan, referral to the Jefferson County Board of CommiSSIOners with information affirming there will be no impact upon the County, publication of notice of the public hearing on this proposed RECEf'TIOfl ijO. i, '! modification, holdmg of the pubhc hearing on April 23, 2001 with all parties afforded a full opportunity to be heard, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Wheat Ridge City Council as follows Section 1. The modlficatlon to the Urban Renewal Plan by the deletion of the land area as depicted on Exhibit 2 hereto and as described on ExhibIt 3 hereto is hereby approved. Section 2. All other provisions of the Urban Renewal Plan, as modified and/or amended from time to time, shall be and remain in effect. 0- v Section 3. Because all other provisions of the Urban Renewal Plan remain in effect. the Council makes the following findings consistent with the Urban Renewal Law based upon the existing provisions of the Urban Renewal Plan. a. No individuals or famIlies will be displaced and their relocation will not be necessitated b. A feasible relocation plan exists for relocation of businesses which may be displaced by an urban renewal project within the modified urban renewal area c The City Council has caused its staff to take reasonable efforts to provide written notice of the public hearing to property owners, residents and business owners in the modified urban renewal area at their last known addresses at least 30 days prior to this public hearing of April 23, 200 I d Section 31-25-107 (4) (d) C R.S of the Urban Renewal Law does not apply in that not more than 120 days have passed since the first public hearing on this modification, because this is the first public hearing e Sectlon 31-25-107 (4) (e) C R.S of the Urban Renewal Law does not apply in that City Council did not fail to previously approve this modification to the Urban Renewal Plan deleting the subject land area. f The modified Urban Renewal Plan conforms to the City's Comprehensive Plan. g The provisions of the Urban Renewal Plan provide maximum opportunity for redevelopment of the urban renewal area by private enterpnse h Sections 31-25-107 (5) and (6) C R.S of the Urban Renewal Law are inapplicable in relationship to this modification of the Urban Renewal Plan. 2 DONE AND RESOLVED this ATTEST RUmG~i NO. J" I, ::J. ....vl. '1 i9 l2~d I .2001 day of ) 3 ~,EiJ~lJUi.: h,_i. i ~ 'l':'" i '11- ( , i i ~ i .-J I '" )" . 'h....... j I . , - ",","" , "I'- '" . :---1 ~~',~" ,~:-':'~'\~"'~~:~~""~t;:'~'1 ! I "" ," ,..- ......~" ','~ ~''''''s,'\0,1~' "'-\' : I ~~,~\\",\~,<~>,\\~\:~\\~t~ i ~~,\",\'\......\,... t~' """"',"',''''',~, ~-~'''<~~~'''F''~:-'':'::::::'''~ ,~::~'"', ------'1) S''' ~,',:~,' r:-;., :',',"',~ '~~>':,,~"~ , ,'. ',,',' ,t, "''\.1" ,-, "'.... ", ,"" t I " i ~ I [) I ~ 'I < ' >- , i I 1 \ : I I I I, : ! : \ I I J l Ii \ 111 II11 F-: "~" "" ~"' · i~J II _ mR YP\t=B~H I l , 2LJI . , ~ {+-UIII ---. ....~::;-'.....'J::: I I ~ a I' ' ~ ~ I I :-i I I i \ \ i \ I I -J ! I II : I I! 1 ( , I II I I I I L- i ,~ WJai1-1"\\~ IIfIT II ') ( I I cjRhJ~~1 Area to be Removed From Urban Renewal Area \~f~~~ Existing Urban Renewal Area 'II ;~ r:.dll I I ~ , I I ~ I eXHIBIT ~ , I I I RECEPTIJr:: i.~O. '.1 I... L~ i : ! I) I I. ~' , 'JI iLl i \ i I I I I lLJ II I II I i , II ~I I ;==:::J E-1 i I I I ] \ '~E,o.Ql:El.--'NE I 11 I I jH . IlITll' j ! I I TTin -\ ~ ill ~I;F ~ r---II ~ t=J I I ~! FH=~~ w ~9;H All!: II ~ III I ' ) , ~ I o ' c < < < I I i i I I - ! I I , i I II. i I I, I i iL I , i r- I I J I ~ ( W J..5TH AVE II!I liIIT 1 [ I I ~r.~i,;1 Area to be Removed From Urban Renewal Area RECEPnQ~ He. II. ,:: ,..' ,.," " EXHIBIT 3 LEGAL DESCRlPTI0N A parcel of land located m the southeast quarter of SectIon 23, Township 3 South, Range 69 West of the 6th Pnnclpal MendIan, County ofJetIerson, State of Colorado, more particularly described as follows Lot 1, Lot 2, Lot 3 and Lot 4 of the Time Square SubdivIsIOn, l; Together with. The entIre Width of the nght-of-way ofW 44th Avenue adjacent to the northerly lot line of Lot 4 ofthc TUl1C Square Subdl\lslon, Together WIth. The entlfe WIdth of the nght-of-way of Wadsworth Boulevard lymg adjacent to the westerly property lines of Lots 1,2 and 3 of the Time Square SubdivIsIOn, Together With. The West Y2 of the NE Y. of the NW 14 of the SE Y4 of SectIon 23, Together With. The North 134 feet of the South 272.5 feet of the East 8 45 feet of the E \/2 of the NW Y. of the SE I/., of SectIon 23, Together WIth. Commencmg at the NW Comer of the NW \.~, SW Y4 , SE Y~ of SectIOn 23, thence along the North lme of smd NW Y4, SW Y4, SE Y4 N 89Q 56'00" E a dIstance of 45 00 feet to a pomt on the Easterly nght-of-way lme of Wadsworth Boulevard, saId pomt bemg the pomt ofbeglnnmg; thence contmumg along Said North Ime N 89056'00" E a distance of 15000 feet; thence S 00004'45" W a distance of 132 50 feet; thence S 89054'10" W, 150 00 feet to a pomt on the Easterly nght-of-way Ime of Wadsworth Boulevard, thence along Said Easterly nght-of-way lme to the pomt ofbeglnnmg; together WIth the entIre Width of the nght-of-way of Wadsworth Boulevard adjacent to the westerly property lme of Said parcel.